The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042401 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Iii AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APRIL 24, 2001 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following case will be discussed: 1) S-P Murdy v. Pedersen et al. 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Margaret Bird Pastor Koger of Hope Lutheran Councilman Pratt Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-06 Resolution: No. 2001-25 R:~,genda\042401 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Relay For Life Presentation and Proclamation 2001 National Crime Victims' Rights Week Proclamation Help Make Great Strides to Cure Cystic Fibrosis Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 23, 2001. Resolution Approving List of Demapd~ RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\042401 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Request for Le,qislative Nominations for Grant Funding for the Children's Museum and the Community Theater RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 5 Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services with Van Dorpe Chou and Associates 6 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve an expenditure in an amount not to exceed $35,000 for Plan Check Services with Van Dorpe Chou Associates. Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for the Pavement Management System - Citywide - FY2000-2001 - Proiect No. PW00-30 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Pavement Management System - Citywide - FY2000-2001 - Project No. PW00-30. R:~Agenda\042401 3 7 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2000-2001 - Proiect No. PW01-01 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Citywide asphalt concrete repairs for FY2000-2001 - Project No. PW01-01. 8 Reimbursement ARreement between Rancho California Water District and the City of Temecula for Mar,qarita Road Wideninq from Plo Pico Road to Dartolo - Proiect No. PW99-01 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Reimbursement Agreement between Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and the City of Temecula for the Margarita Road Widening from Plo Pico Road to Dartolo - Project No. PW99-01. 9 10 Award of Construction Contract for the Pavement Manaqement System - Proiect No. PW99-17 - Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Award a contract for the Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-17 - Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - to R.J. Noble Company for $603,425.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract; 9.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $60,342.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Meanderinq Sidewalk along North General Kearny Road for Christ the Vine Lutheran Church Project (LD00-210GR) - (located south of North General Kearny Road approximately 325 feet east of the Marqarita Road and North General Kearny centerline intersection RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept a meandering sidewalk easement along North General Kearny Road for public use only. 11 Consideration of sponsorship request for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Consider the sponsorship request of $30,000 for the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. R:~Agenda\042401 4 12 1-15/Rancho California Road nterchan.qe Improvements (Project No. PW95-12) Southern California Gas Company (SCG} Work Authorization Agreement to Relocate an ex sting 6" H .qh Pressure Gas Main RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Authorize payment to the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for construction fees in the amount of $27,409.40. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY R:~Agenda\042401 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-07 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Fourth of July Fireworks Presentation RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Award a contract to Pyro Spectaculars for the preparation and display of the 2001 and 2002 Fourth of July Extravaganza Fireworks Show presentations for an amount not to exceed $25,000 annually. R:~Agenda\042401 6 2 TCSD Proposed Rates and Char,qes for FY 2001-2002 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A, REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 8, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\042401 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2001-02 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Sione, Roberts A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item no~t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Convene a Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency AGENCY BUSINESS Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority; Approval of Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA R:V~genda\042401 8 1.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, RDA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA 1.3 That the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Temecula Public Financing Authority. Recess City Council Meeting 2 Old Town Community Theater Schematic Desiqn and Master Site Plan RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Old Town Community Theater Schematic Design and Master Site Plan; 2.2 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; 2.3 Provide direction to proceed with design development and construction drawings. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 8, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\042401 9 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: No. TPFA 2001-01 Resolution: No. TPFA 2001-01 CALL TO ORDER: President JeffComerchero ROLL CALL DIRECTORS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record AUTHORITY BUSINESS Administrative Matters and Initial Actions relating to Formation of Community Facilities District RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Appoint, by minute order, a Chairperson from among its Board of Directors; 1.2 Adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS R:~Agenda\042401 10 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ADOPTING LOCAL GOALS AND POLICIES FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF PETITIONS TO FORM A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT R:~genda\042401 11 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS 13 Discussion of 1999 Draft Traffic Study (Requested by Councilman Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Provide direction to staff concerning the Draft 1999 Traffic Study. 14 Proposed Eastern Urban Limit Line RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a map titled Proposed Eastern Urban Limit Line. 15 Roripau,qh Ranch Specific Plan Processin,q Schedule, RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Provide direction to staff. 16 Selection of City Council representative to serve on Desiqn Team for the Wolf Creek Fire, Station RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Select one member to serve on the Design Team for the Wolf Creek Fire Station. 17 Authorization to file letter of protest with the California Public Utilities Commission regarding the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project (Application Number :A.01-03-036) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Authorize the City Attorney to file a letter of protest with the California Public Utilities Commission regarding the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project as proposed by the San Diego Gas and Electric Company. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 8, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\042401 12 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS r~ ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 23, 200t The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:30 P.M. and convened in a regular meeting at 7:01 P.M., on Tuesday, January 23, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Aaron Breid. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Rabbi David Barnett of Congregation B'Nai Chaim of Murrieta. ALLEGIANCE The Flag Ceremony and salute to the Flag was led by Troop 148. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Ron Packard Presentation Having served this City and this Congressional District for the past 18 years, Mayor Comerchero, on a personal note, relayed his pleasure of having had the opportunity to work with Congressman Packard. At this time, Mayor Comerchero presented Congressman Packard with a Certificate of Appreciation and commented on Mr. Packard's last action to ensure the addition of specific language in a Bill pertaining to funding for Murrieta Creek, saving the City approximately $20 million. With appreciation, Congressman Packard accepted the Certificate and introduced his wife, Jean, and thanked her for her support and assistance over the years. Mr. Packard relayed his delight in having had the opportunity to serve with the City Council in the betterment of this community, noting that the City has grown into a beautiful, prosperous, and wonderful place to live. Expressing his regret in seeing Congressman Packard retire, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts thanked Mr. Packard for always having been there for the City. R:\Minutes\012301 1 Press Enterprise Presentation to the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival (Inland Empire's Readers' Choice Award of Favorite Festival) Ms. Maria D'Avanzo, Advertising & Community Relations Manager of Southwest Riverside County for the Press-Enterprise, informed the public that the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival has been awarded the Readers' Choice Award for the Favorite Temecula Community Event. Thanking the sponsors and volunteers, Ms. Carol Popejoy-Hime, General Manager for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, expressed appreciation and noted that this event would not be possible without the efforts of the sponsors and volunteers. Proclamation to Van Avery Prep School for the receipt of the Bravo Award Ms. Tina Naber and Angel Pena, co-principals at Van Avery and Kids World Preschool and Elementary school, graciously accepted the proclamation and extended their appreciation for the recognition. Presentation of 10-year service pins to Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts, Plannin.q Commission Chairman Ron Guerriero, and Former Community Services Commissioner Jeff Nimeshein Mayor Comerchero presented each individual with a 10-year service pin. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised that in January 1990 the Traffic Director Program was formed and that, at that time, the City had half the population; had two overcrossings; had one lane traveling each way with stop signs; and noted that the traffic was worse at that time; and that the City incorporated in an effort to take control of the situation and has since accomplished many benefits with regard to traffic. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Inviting the public to attend, Mr. David Rosenthal commented on the upcoming Business-to-Business Expo on Friday, January 26, 2001, at the Pechanga facility, noting the Expo is being hosted by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Thanking and relaying appreciation to the three individuals who received their 10-year service pins, Councilman Stone commended them for their years of public service, noting that the City would not be the wonderful place that it is without their service. B. Councilman Naggar reported on the Multi-Species Habitat Component of the Riverside County Integrated Project, advising that a meeting has been scheduled for next week with representatives from the cities of Lake Elsinore and Murrieta in an effort to address their concerns with regard to this component and noting that he would report on the outcome of this meeting. As members of the Electrical Needs Subcommittee, Councilman Naggar advised that Mayor Comerchero and he had met with members from the Chamber of Commerce, representatives from Southern California, and staff and noted that a number of measures will be implemented, including the scheduling of a Community Workshop. C. Councilman Pratt relayed his appreciation to Congressman Packard for his last action with regard to the funding for Murrieta Creek. R:\Minutes\012301 2 Reading his letter into the record (copies provided to the City Council), Councilman Pratt clarified his stance with regard to growth, noting that he would not be desirous of stopping growth but that he would be desirous of responsible growth. Mr. Pratt requested that the City Council agendize for its February 13, 2001, meeting discussion of a Special Election, limiting annual residential building permits to 450 residential units and that this remain in effect for a minimum period of two years until acceptable traffic circulation/mitigation of convenient effective local/urban public transportation system, financed with the Development Agreement of a public/private partnership and adequate school funding to meet the increased school demands are in place as determined by the citizens. City Attorney Thorson advised that, as per the Brown Act, the City Council may make a motion to agendize the matter for the next City Council meeting but that any discussions regarding the matter must be brief. MOTION: Councilman Pratt moved to agendize his request to the February 13, 2001, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar. (This motion ultimately failed; see below.) Councilman Naggar advised that reviewing the viability and feasibility of limiting the number of building permits is currently an element of the City's Growth Management Plan. With regard to Councilman Pratt's comments, Councilman Stone stated that although Mr. Pratt may not be calling it growth control, in his opinion, that is what Councilman Pratt is trying to accomplish; noted that the citizens will have the ability to vote in November for three City Councilmembers; and relayed his opposition to such a motion because of the amenities quality projects such as this one bring to the City such as new roads, parks, library, Police Station, and infrastructure. At this time, voice vote on the previously made motion reflected denial of the motion with Councilmembers Pratt and Naggar supporting the motion and Councilmembers Roberts and Stone and Mayor Comerchero voting in opposition of the motion. Councilman Naggar requested that the matter we agendized to a future General Plan Subcommittee meeting. D. Having spent last week in Washington, D.C., at the U.S. Conference of Mayors, Mayor Comerchero advised that the adoption of a rail policy for America was set as a chief legislative priority for the year 2001, noting that a $10 billion measure will be introduced at the Senate level. Advising that the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) is working on establishing a freeway- flyer system from the City of Temecula, Mr. Comerchero commented on resource problems to accomplish this task, noting that other local organizations are being contacted as well as grant funding is being explored in order to review transportation options. For the benefit of the public, Mayor Comerchero advised ihat the Electrical Needs Subcommittee has compiled a list of key legislators, along with fax numbers, to contact with regard to the Energy Crisis. R:\Minutes\012301 3 CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution Approvin,q List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 Purchase of Compaq Proliant Server RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the purchase of a dual Compaq Proliant Server and Disk Storage Array System from Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., of Riverside, California, for the total amount of $57,618.72. 4 Maintenance Facility Modification Project - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Reject all bids received August 29, 2000, for the Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16; 4.2 Approve the revised Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16. 5 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\Minutes\012301 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM EFFECTIVE OCTOBER '1, 2000, TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE ELEMENTS OF TITLE 49, PART 26, OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR) ENTITLED PARTICIPATION BY DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND DESIGNATING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER AS THE DBE LIAISON OFFICER AND AUTHORIZING THE DBE LIAISON OFFICER TO CONDUCT A REVIEW OF THE ANNUAL OVERALL GOAL PERCENTAGE AND ADJUST SUCH PERCENTAGE EACH FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR AS NECESSARY ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTING AND MONITORING OF THE DBE PROGRAM Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula Rod Run 2001 Event in Old Town (Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road and Second Street and other related streets) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 2001 EVENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT (Councilman Stone abstained with regard to this item.) Amendment to Annual Aqreements - CIP Proiects approved for FY 2000-2001 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 of the annual agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc., to provide as needed geotechnical and materials testing services by extending the agreement through June 30, 2001, and increase the amount of the agreement by $25,000; 7.2 Approve Amendment No.1 of the annual agreement with Converse Consultants to provide as needed geotechnical and materials testing by extending the agreement through June 30, 2001, and increase the amount of the agreement by $25,000; 7.3 Approve Amendment No.1 of the annual agreement with Kevin Cozad & Associates to provide as needed survey services by extending the agreement through June 30, 2001, and increase the amount of the agreement by $25,000; R:\Minutes\012301 5 7.4 Approve Amendment No.1 of the annual agreement with O'Malley Engineering Corporation to provide as needed survey services by extending the agreement through June 30, 2001, and increase the amount of the agreement by $25,000; 7.5 Approve Amendment No.1 of the annual agreement with Robert Shea Purdue Real Estate Appraisal to provide as needed appraisal services extending the agreement through June 30, 2001, and increase the amount of the agreement by $25,000; 7.6 Authorize the Mayor to execute these amendments. 8 Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 9 Resolution of Support (Requested by Mayor Comerchero) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA URGING STATE SUPPORT TO PRESERVE AND EXTEND ZERO-EMISSION VEHICLE (ZEV) PROGRAMS 10 Letter of Support for Riverside County Transit A,qency (RTA) Grant Application (Requested by Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign a Letter of Support for the Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) to include in an upcoming application to receive grant funds for transit planning. (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 7.) 11 The 2000 General Plan Implementation Report RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-'10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2000 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION REPORT R:\Minutes\012301 6 (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 7-8.) 12 Community Service Fundin,q Pro,qram - Veterans of Forei,qn Wars RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve a reallocation of Community Services Funding to the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) in the amount of $5,000. (Pulled for separate discussion; see page 8.) MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I - 9 (Item Nos. 10, 11, and 12 were pulled for separate discussion.) The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who abstained with regard to Item No. 6 (Temecula Rod Run 2001 Event). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION 10 Letter of Support for Riverside County Transit A.qency (RTA) Grant Application (Requested by Councilman Pratt) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign a Letter of Support for the Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) to include in an upcoming application to receive grant funds for transit planning. Assistant City Manager O'Grady reviewed the staff report (of record). MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 11 The 2000 General Plan Implementation Report RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2000 GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION REPORT Advising that the General Plan Implementation Report is a statutory requirement, Deputy City Manager Thornhill provided a brief overview of the staff report (as per agenda material). MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to approve staff recommendation and adopt Resolution No. 01-10. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\012301 7 12 Community Service Fundin,q Program -Veterans of Foreiqn Wars RECOMMENDATION: 12.2 Approve a reallocation of Community Services Funding to the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFVV) in the amount of $5,000. Briefly reviewing the request, Mayor Comerchero reiterated his request, made at the January 9, 2001, City Council meeting, to reprogram the previously approved $5,000 grant to VFVV for improvements to the current site because the organization will be vacating the site and, therefore, suggested that the $5,000 grant be reallocated toward relocation expenses. Mr. Tom Stultz, 32076 Corte Soledad, apprised the City Council of discussions that he will be having with the Temecula Town Association in an effort to preserve a meeting site, in the City of Temecula, for the Veterans. For Councilman Naggar, Mr. Stultz advised that the organizations rent was raised from $150 a month to $990 plus water. Mr. Armando Lopez, representing VFVV, expressed his appreciation and thanked the City Council for its support, not only for the monetary support, but as well for the inclusion in City activities. Mr. Tony Luna, 29000 Pujol Street, thanked the City Council for its support. Appreciating the attendance of the Veterans and their families, Councilman Stone thanked the Veterans for their years of service and requested that a $10,000 ($5,000 from Community Service Funding and an additional $5,000 from next years Community Service Funding) be allocated to the VFW. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to allocate a total of $10,000 ($5,000 from Community Service Funding and an additional $5,000 from next years Community Service Funding) to the VFVV. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar. (This motion was ultimately superseded by an amended motion.) Concurring with Councilman Stone's suggestion, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts recommended the formation of a subcommittee to review the matter and offered to serve on the subcommittee. AMENDED MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to allocate $10,000 and to form a subcommittee, comprised of Mayor Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, which would make a recommendation to the City Council with regard to the use General Fund Reserves, as necessary, in order to accommodate the Veterans' needs. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Councilman Naggar suggested that the subcommittee explore the use of CDBG monies. Councilman Pratt recommended the continued involvement of Mr. Stultz. At 7:54 P.M., Mayor Comerchero convened as the Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency and after a brief recess, reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:11 P.M. R:\Minutes\012301 8 PUBLIC HEARING 13 Wolf Creek Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 12 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0482) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. 13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-t2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0484 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PARCELS TOTALING 657 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETVVEEN LOMA LINDA AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD (FORMERLY FAIRVlEW AVENUE), AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, -005, -033 AND 950- 180-001, -005, -006 AND -010, BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT 13.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. t2, THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98- 0481) 13.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 0t-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ZONING STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 12, THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 98-0481) R:\Minutes\012301 9 13.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-t4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0052 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29305, THE SUBDIVISION OF 557 ACRES INTO 47 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PALA ROAD, BETWEEN LOMALINDA AND DEER HOLLOW ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 950-110-002, -005, - 033 AND 950-180-00t, -005, -006 AND -010 13.6 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND S-P MURDY, LLC" (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0029) Deputy City Manager Thornhiil reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material); commented on City Council's direction that staff work with the applicant in an effort to formulate a condition relating to Level of Service (LOS) D on Pala Road and the interchange and the intersection between Pala Road and the freeway which reads as follows: Prior to the approval of Tentative Tract Maps for Planning Area Nos. 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, inclusive, and while recognizing State Route 79 South (SR79S) and Interstate 15 are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the State of California as acknowledged in the General Plan, the City may consider the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City. The City may then authorize the Director of Public Works of the City to make a reasonable determination based upon traffic studies then conducted or authorized by the City that the Level of Service for traffic at the intersection of: o Interstate 15 Freeway Southbound ramps (north/south) and Highway 79 South (eastJwest) has fallen below Level of Service D; o Interstate 15 Freeway Northbound ramps (north/south) and Highway 79 South (eastJwest) has fallen below Level of Service D; o Bedford Court and SR79S has fallen below Level of Service D; o La Paz and SR79S has fallen below Level of Service D. Such traffic studies shall be based on traffic generated only by (1) land uses of projects that are currently existing as approved by the City or the County of Riverside as of the date of the approval of this project and (2) traffic circulation patterns existing as of the date of the approval of this project. The traffic studies shall use (1) documentation of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the project using the traffic analysis study area applicable to the project; and (2) evaluate traffic conditions as applicable to the project using the current (now existing) Temecula General Plan Traffic Model. R:\Minutes\012301 10 This action shall be taken after the City makes a finding that such condition exists that is detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Temecula or its residents. City Attorney Thorson as well noted that the City Council must reconcile the differences between the Planning Commission and staff's suggested modifications to six of the recommended conditions of approval. With regard to the proposed condition pertaining to LOS D, City Attorney Thorson, for Councilman Naggar, advised that the proposed condition would not empower the City anymore than it currently is empowered; that the proposed condition would require that prior to the developer obtaining the right to continue to build out, a traffic study would be required; that, at this point, the City would evaluate the impact of the traffic upon the existing established patterns; that if it were determined that the level of service has reached a level below LOS D and findings have been made that it would be adverse to the health, safety, and general welfare, further issuance of building permits could be prehibited until corrected for this project along the corridor. For Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the proposed condition differs from the condition proposed by the Planning Commission in that it requires a finding to be made prior to the approval of the Tentative Tract Maps and that the requirement of Bedford Court and La Paz have been included. In response to Mayor Pre Tem Roberts, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that the proposed LOS condition has been structured so that it would be based on existing land use patterns in the General Plan and, therefore, the developer would not be subject to County- induced changes. Based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Councilman Pratt relayed his opposition as it relates to traffic circulation and noted that the LOS D condition would be a mute point since, in his opinion, it could not be executed. Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that staff is confident that the proposed condition has been structured in a manner to make it effective; that if there were any uncertainty with respect to the Southwest Area, it would be within the County; that most changes that have occurred in terms of land use, since the adoption of the City's General Plan, have been in the County and not the City; that the County's continual approval of major land use changes have caused changes in the cumulative traffic analysis; and that individuals are simply driving more than they ever have. Councilman Pratt relayed his opposition to Deputy City Manager Thornhill's comments. Continuing with an overview of the project, Deputy City Manager Thornhill addressed the modifications recommended by the Planning Commission, noting the following: Augment the Mitigation Monitoring Program with the General Plan EIR mitigations o That Condition No. 6 of the Specific Plan requires the applicant to comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the adopted City of Temecula General Plan; staff is of the opinion that there is sufficient language in the condition of approval to assure compliance with these mitigation measures R:\Minutes\012301 11 Specify only one option for narrower streets o That it is important to have flexibility with respect to the street sections and that Condition No. 15 of the Specific Plan addresses narrower streets Require that the City hire an architect consultant to review the Planned Development Overlay o That the language in Condition No. 16 of the Specific Plan was changed to read as follows: When courtyard homes are implemented, a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission as opposed to a Planned Development Overlay; that because design guidelines in the Specific Plan are sufficient and because the Planning Commission and staff review the PDO, staff has concerns with hiring an outside architect · Delete the split garage option o That staff would request flexibility with regard to this item Require garages in lieu of carports in the multi-family senior housing projects o That staff would request flexibility with regard to this item; that the project is a 10- year build out project and that it would be difficult to determine, at this point in time, what the market may dictate in the future Require Product Review approval from the Planning Commission o That the Development Code requires that product review is discussed at the Director's hearing and that deviating from that process would require a change to the Development Code. Commenting on the Development Agreement (DA), Mr. Thornhill referenced Section 4.6 (Off- site Improvement Funding) of the Agreement, noting that an exhibit would be attached to the DA to clarify all improvements referenced in Section 4.6. Advising that he has received a letter of concern from Pechanga with regard to the monitoring of cultural resources, Mr. Thornhill advised that it would be staff's opinion as well as the developer's that a cultural resource observer be on site at the time the property is graded and that a condition be imposed or that the existing condition be enhanced. Having as well reviewed the letter from Pechanga, City Attorney Thorson referenced the EIR, page 35, Section 3.8 (Cultural Resources) and noted that no additional language would be necessary, advising that those issues of concern would be addressed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Further addressing the project, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted the following: · That the Fire Station will be comprised of 1.5 acres; land to be immediately dedicated to the City by way of Grant Deed · That the developer will provide a $700,000 interest-free loan for the construction of the Fire Station · That, as per the DA, the developer, if the permanent facility were not completed on time, would pay for the fire vehicle, operation, and maintenance if an interim facility · That it would be staff's goal to have the Fire Station completed prior to the construction of the 250th dwelling unit · That the option for narrower streets has been reentered into the DA · That the developer will be providing $200 per unit fee for public art/open space/and habitat, noting that the City has not previously imposed such a condition on a developer R:\Minutes\012301 12 That based on the developer's participation in the Assessment District and the off-site improvements, the project will not be subject to any additional Transportation Uniform Mitigation FEE (TUMF)because the developer will be constructing facilities which would have been included in the TUMF. Community Services Director Parker confirmed that the Quimby value for this project would be $3.6 million; advised that the parks, with the exception of the Sports Park, will be developed through the park development impact fee credits and that the Sports Park will be developed by the City, an expenditure which has already been budgeted in the CIP. Councilman Naggar, in his opinion, stated that the prepared EIR was based on outdated material such as the City's General Plan EIR as it relates to the service of electricity, noting that changes have occurred with regard to this issue. Mr. Naggar requested the imposition of an additional condition as follows: that no building permits be issued within a specified time (2 to 6 months) of a Stage 3 Alert being called, stating that he would not be able to approve 2,000 dwelling units without being certain that electricity could be provided to those units. In response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that staff had consulted Southern California Edison and that their reply was that power could be supplied to those units and that no concerns were expressed; that the EIR for this project was not based on the City's General Plan EIR; and that the project EIR was based on current information. Viewing the electricity situation as a State problem, Councilman Stone stated that the pressure should be on the State to enact new legislation to remedy the situation, not on the industrial users of the State of California, commenting on the potential economic downfall of such action. Mr. Naggar as well advised that residents have expressed concern to him with regard to school funding and questioned where the children from this project will be attending school. Although the developer will be paying a Development Impact Fee for the construction of schools, Mr. Naggar noted that the fee would be supplemented by the State and expressed concern if State funding were not available which would result in children attending schools out of their neighborhoods which, in turn, would create additional traffic. At this time, Mayor Comerchero invited public input. Deferring his comments until after public input, Mr. William Griffith, applicant, representing Spring Pacific Properties, advised that he was present. Commenting on the amenities Wolf Creek would be providing to the City such as a sports park, schools, and needed housing to accommodate the growing population, Ms. Margaret Whiston, 43166 Camino Casillas, addressed the lack of available senior housing throughout the City and spoke in support of the project. Mr. Joseph Terrazas, 31160 Lahontan, representing the Wolf Valley Homeowners Association, relayed concerns with regard to density, traffic, and noise and requested that the sound wall be constructed to Via Eduardo from Rainbow Canyon and that six lanes be constructed to Via Eduardo. Although voicing no opposition to development, economic development, or projects like Wolf Creek, Mr. Robert Wheeler, 29090 Camino Alba, noted that such development depends on when and where it is located. Concurring with Councilman Naggar's concerns relative to electricity, water, and traffic, Mr. Wheeler stated that the electrical impact is cumulative. R:\Minutes\012301 13 For Councilman Stone, City Attorney Thorson advised that because the developer will be paying a mitigation fee for schools, the City has no legal mechanism to limit the number of dwelling units tied to the function of an elementary/middle school within the particular Specific Plan; that a Statewide mitigation fee was imposed several years ago for school facilities and, thereby, the State eliminated the cities authority to impose mitigation requirements for schools; therefore, it would not be a criteria to approve or disapprove this Plan based on those issues. Addressing the project as it relates to school facilities, Mr. Jeff Okun, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District, Assistant Superintendent of Business Support Services of the District, noted the following: · That the site for the middle school has been graded with State funds and will continue to be graded; that the grading contract has not been cancelled; that the School Board cancelled the construction' contracts because the District has not received State funding; · That State funding for the construction of the elementary/middle schools has not been guaranteed; that State allocation has been received for design and site studies; · That the District has a Purchase Agreement; that the property is in escrow; that there are three agreements on this particular piece of property - a Mitigation Agreement and two Purchase Agreements (one for an elementary school and one for a middle school); · That State funds are allocated quarterly. Mr. Okun briefly reviewed pending District projects, as per State ratings, noting that the funding for a high school is the District's highest priority; · That the District has an agreement with the developer to pay $3.03 (Level 2 of State funding) per square foot which would equate to $12 million, based on approximately 2,000 dwelling units, for this particular project prior to the sports complex; · That the total cost, including acquisition of land, for the elementary school would be approximately $9 million (land only approximately $2.1 million); that the total cost, including acquisition of land, for the middle school would be approximately $20 million (land only approximately $2.9 million); · That the proposed project at approximately 2,000 dwelling units will generate approximately 1,500 students; that the project will not fully fill a middle school or a high school but would almost fill an elementary school; · That the Trustees have entered into a Mitigation Agreement which reflects that this project has mitigated its impacts. Mr. Okun briefly reviewed alterative funding options available to the School District to ensure the construction of schools, noting that if schools were not constructed, other schools sites would be provided to the children of this project. Addressing comments with regard to the project, Mr. Griffith advised that the middle school has been graded and that escrow has been set up under the representation that the site was approved and funding has as well been approved; that under the terms of the Purchase Agreement (land acquisition only), the middle school site may close escrow without paying for the site and payment would be dependent upon receipt of State funding for the site; that the elementary school has a different timeline; that elementary school would be necessary to service the needs of this project; and that the elementary school would be considered by way of Community Facilities District (CFD) funding. Mr. Okun noted that the CFD funding will assist in the funding of the construction of both schools but that it would not cover the entire cost. Although voicing no opposition to growth, Mr. Mark Broderick, 45501 Clubhouse, requested more reasonable growth, noting that he would oppose the project as presented. Mr. Broderick R:\Minutes\012301 14 stated that the proposed amenities would not outweigh the significant impacts (air quality and traffic) to the community. With regard to traffic, he suggested that another traffic study be completed. If the project were approved, Mr. Broderick recommended the following: · That the lot size for Planning Area No. 6 (proposed 5,000 square foot lots) be increased to 7,200 square foot lots in an effort to preserve and protect the property values of the existing homes; · That approving the highest allowable density zoned for the area in Planning Area No. 18 (Senior Housing) would be setting an undesirable precedent. In response to Councilman Naggar who was of the opinion that the cumulative traffic impact has not been properly addressed, Mr. Broderick noted his support of the imposition of a condition that if LOS were to drop below D at the key intersection, no additional building permits would be issued. Mr. Broderick as well noted that if lot coverage were addressed in a Design Review Committee, he would be satisfied. Having lived in the City of Temecula for the past 12 years, Ms. JoAnn Galuska, 31320 Via Eduardo, noted that she would not concur with Mayor Pro Tern Roberts' comments that traffic has gotten better over the years. Ms. Galuska relayed her opposition to the approval of this project and encouraged the City Councilmembers to equally weigh both sides of the issues. For Ms. Galuska, Councilman Stone advised that the project, as proposed, would actually be less dense than allowable; that the property of discussion is heavily indebted to provide public infrastructure not only for the proponent of this project but as well if the City were unsuccessful, in the County areas, in inhibiting some of the growth, stating that the only way for individuals to travel through this City will be by way of public improvements and noting that without development the City will not obtain parks, streets, and .regional infrastructure. Mr. Stone noted that the debt on the property would not permit half the density as proposed plus get all the public improvements. Submitting a letter of concern to the City Clerk, Ms. Pamelo Miod, 31995 Via Saltio, voiced her opposition to this project because of key issues of concern, noting primarily the following: Cumulative traffic impacts · Suggested to prepare an update to the traffic study which does not consider new cumulative impacts and recirculate for public review and comment Air Quality · Questioned how a sports park and bus turnout could be deemed as amenities which are considered as overall benefits to the community and outweigh the harm of air quality impacts. Prior to approving this project, Ms. Miod requested that it be proven to the citizens of Temecula that the City, as a result of this project, will not experience traffic gridlock on SR 79 South. Since funding for the school has not yet been identified, she requested that this project not be approved until those details have been resolved. Ms. Miod concurred with concerns expressed relative to the electricity and power crisis and as well commented on her desire to preserve the land between Redhawk and the proposed project, noting that this land would be key to implementing the Trails Master Plan. Advising that the City is attempting to prevent LOS F - a level which would create gridlock, Mayor Comerchero noted that LOS D is an acceptable level. R:\Minutes\012301 15 In response to Councilman Naggar's recommended condition to prohibit the issuance of building permits if the level of service were to drop below D, Ms. Miod questioned on who would be making such a determination and noted that some individuals would view LOS D as unacceptable. Applicant Rebuttal In response to the public comments, Mr. Griffith relayed efforts that have been undertaken to communicate with many individuals as it relates to this project and noted the following: · That the traffic study prepared for Wolf Creek has been thoroughly reviewed by staff and has been augmented on several occasions · That the Circulation Plan reflects several points of access to be considered for this area · That no overriding consideration is being requested for traffic,' commenting the two rigorous LOS conditions potentially being imposed · That two overriding considerations are being requested - one is a consideration that the City considers in every instance in approving projects and the other is loss of agriculture land; that both overriding considerations are covered in City's General Plan and the project EIR · That Planning Area No. 6 (5,000 square foot lots) is separated by a 124' drainage parkway and the right-of-way for Pala Road which requires 250' of separation from those home which have a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet · That the General Plan specifically provides senior housing at a permitted density of 22 units per acre; that no exception is being requested; but that he would recommend 25 units per acre, advising that at that level the City would reach the State mandate · That the school elements of the project have been adequately addressed; that the high school has been relocated, originally located on the property to the Redhawk side; that the middle school was negotiated with the School District but would not be required for a significant period of time (dependent on occupancy); that at build out, half a middle school would be required; that the elementary school will proceed on its own timeline (dependent on occupancy); that the property for the elementary school has been agreed upon and escrow has been set up · That as landowner a contribution of $1.2 million has been made to AD 159 with an additional $10.5 million to be made · That viewing growth in the sense maturation, the area of discussion needs to mature (schools, fire station, parks, shopping, etc.) in an effort to address existing deficiencies; that not approving this project based on uncontrollable issues (water, electricity, etc.) would as well put the addressed deficiencies at risk In closing, Mr. Griffith thanked staff, the citizens, the members of the Planning Commission, and the members of the City Council for their time and interest in this project, advising that the time and interest has helped define a better project. In response to Councilman Naggar, Mr. Griffith stated that the appropriate time to verify the level of service on Pala Road and Highway 79 would be at the Tentative Tract Map phase and not at the issuance of building permits, noting that the Tentative Tract Map phase is subject to a public hearing and a finding process under the EIR; that if the homes were built and it were determined that the level of service were below D, individuals may have already bought homes. R:\Minutes\012301 16 Mr. Griffith noted his concurrence with the revised condition pertaining to LOS D as suggested by Deputy City Manager Thornhill. Clarifying the Planning Commission condition with regard to LOS D and the condition being proposed by staff with regard to LOS D, City Attorney Thorson advised that staff's proposed condition limits the scope of the traffic study to the traffic circulation patterns and the land use projects and approvals that are currently existing; that the traffic study would be limited to what the EIR reviewed as it pertains to this project; that if traffic were to fall below LOS D, it would be determined that there is a health, safety, and general welfare impact on the resident and the Tentative Tract Map for this specific area would not be permitted to progress; that the condition does not address the approval of maps or building permits for any areas other than the Wolf Creek Specific Plan; and that with the approval of this condition, the City will have the protection that Wolf Creek will develop and will have impacts that have already been identified. Councilman Naggar reiterated that, in his opinion, the cumulative traffic impacts for this corridor have not been properly addressed or studied. Commenting on the draft form traffic study completed by Wilbur Smith, which Councilman Naggar continues to reference, Mr. Griffith advised that this study was never circulated or criticized; that the Wolf Creek traffic study has been developed per the approved Temecula traffic model which is consistent with the Circulation Plan as identified within the General Plan; and that the study has been reviewed by Public Works Director Hughes, City's traffic staff, and has been updated on numerous occasions. Mr. Griffith reiterated his acceptance of the LOS condition as proposed with the qualification that the same modification be applied to the LOS on Pala Road prior to the Tentative Tract Map approval. For Councilman Pratt, Mr. Griffith advised that, if approved, the first homes would be available within 18 to 24 months; that at the time the Tentative Tract Map were approved, the traffic conditions of the.project would have to be reaffirmed; that the City's General Plan reflects a goal to attain a LOS D and does not indicate denial of a project with a LOS of D. In an effort to address Mr. Pratt's concern, Mr. Griffith advised that he as well as another developer would be willing to participate in a public education process with regard to public transportation. At this time, Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing. Reiterating his concerns, Councilman Naggar stated that the Wolf Creek EIR relies upon the City's General Plan EIR which was completed in 1993; that the information is outdated and unreliable; and that the cumulative impacts have not been properly addressed, expressing concern with the impacts on the intersections in the area of discussion. Viewing it as inappropriate and unfair, Mayor Comerchero stated that the City should not request this developer nor any other developer to resolve all traffic impacts within the area of discussion and that the City should assure that the developer be responsible for those impacts created by this project. Councilman Naggar noted that the completed EIR for AD 159 is as well outdated; that the AD will not cover all ultimate funding for the corridor improvements; and that the City Council has not received the materials necessary to proceed with due diligence. Mr. Naggar reiterated his concern with regional traffic impacts. .MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adjourn to 11:00 P.M. as a time certain. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Mayor Comerchero announced that the meeting would not proceed after 11:00 P.M. R:\Minutes\012301 17 Commenting on the benefits this development will be contributing to this community, Councilman Stone advised that the City's EIR, when completed, was based on population densities far greater than what currently exists, noting that the City's originally approved densities have been reduced by 8%; that this development will be paying the price to mitigate the impacts it would impose upon the City; that the developer should not be held responsible to mitigate more than his fair share; that it has been confirmed by Public Works Director Hughes that if Pechanga were to create three times more traffic than projected, there would still be 25% excess capacity along Pala Road; that the City Council should depend on staff expertise; and that the proposed project is a quality project which adheres to the City's Growth Management Plan and will provide public amenities the City would otherwise not be able to provide. Concurring with Councilman Stone's comments, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts commented on the benefits of the proposed infrastructure improvements. For Councilman Pratt, City Attorney Thorson clarified that if the level of service at the corner of Pala Road and Highway 79 South were to drop to LOS F at the time this development were ready to sell homes, the City would have to determine the calculation of LOS F and if calculated on currently existing approved projects by City/County and the traffic circulation patterns existing as today, the developer would not be able to proceed with the Tentative Tract Maps. If LOS F were created as a result of County projects and other analysis does not reflect it as F, the developer may proceed. Mr. Pratt reiterated his desire for public transportation. For Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorson advised that if the LOS F were based on existing land uses of projects currently existing and approved, the developer would not be permitted to pull building permits. Considering product review would not only pertain to this project but for the City overall, Mayor Comerchero suggested that product review be agendized to a future City Council meeting and that if changes were made, those changes would be applied to the Wolf Creek project. At this time, a straw vote with regard to the condition for LOS D reflected unanimous approval. Straw votes with regard to modifications recommended by the Planning Commission - reference pages 'Il and 12 Augment the Mitigation Monitoring Program with the General Plan EIR mitigations · Straw vote reflected unanimous approval with staffs recommendation Specify only one option for narrower streets · Straw vote reflected approval with staff's recommendation Require that the City hire an architect consultant to review the Planned Development Overlay · Straw vote reflected approval with staff's recommendation Delete the split garage option · Straw vote reflected unanimous approval with staffs recommendation R:\Minutes\012301 18 Require .qara~es in lieu of carports in the multi-family senior housing proiects · Straw vote reflected unanimous approval with the Planning Commission Require Product Review approval from the Plannin,q Commission · Straw vote reflected unanimous approval with staff's recommendation With regard to Condition No. 74 (Infrastructure Phase B), Mr. Griffith requested that A. Circulation, Section iii, be amended as follows: Prior to the 1557th building permit, deleting the words to the opening of the City Sports Park. City Council and staff voiced no opposition to this request. With regard to Condition No. 75, Mr. Griffith requested that consideration of LOS D be reviewed at the Tentative Tract Map Stage at the Planning Commission, amending the last paragraph to read as follows: Regardless ifa financing mechanism were established, no Tentative Tract Maps will be approved that will result... City Council and staff voiced no opposition to this request. With regard to the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) condition, Mr. Griffith requested that because MWD is not an approval agency, verbiage be amended to reflect coordination with the District versus approval from the District. City Council and staff voiced no opposition. City Attorney Thorson requested that each recommendation be separately considered. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.1 and to adopt Resolution No. 01-11. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. Mr. Griffith confirmed, for Councilman Naggar, that the proposed schoo! sites will not be developed as homes sites unless the School District were to choose to not acquire the property, reiterating the previously noted agreements with the School District. Councilman Naggar requested that a condition be imposed prohibiting the issuance of building permits within six months of a Stage 3 Alert being called. Because the electricity issue is not within the City's control and because such a condition has not been imposed on other projects, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts relayed his opposition to such a condition. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.2 and to adopt Resolution No. 01-12. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.3 and to adopt Resolution No. 01-13. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. City Attorney Thorson introduced Ordinance No.01-01 and read it by title only. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.4 and to introduce Ordinance No. 01-01. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. R:~linutes\012301 19 MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.5 and to adopt Resolution No. 01-14. The motion was seconded by Mayor Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. City Attorney Thorson introduced Ordinance No. 01-02 and read it by title only. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve recommendation 13.6 and to introduce Ordinance No. 01-02. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt who voted in opposition. COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 Selection of City Council Committee Assignments RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees and to the Pechanga Tribal Council: · Community Services Commission · Old Town Local Review Board · Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee · Planning Commission · Public/Traffic Safety Commission · Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison 14.2 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following external committees: · City of Murrieta Liaison (2 Members) · County General Plan Update Committee- RCIP · French Valley Airport Committee (2 Members) · League of California Congress - Voting Delegates (Member and Alternate) · Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Committee · Murrieta Creek Advisory Board (Member and Alternate) · National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2001 Voting Delegate (Member and Alternate) · Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency · Riverside County Transportation Commission (Member and Alternate) · Riverside Transit Agency Representative (Member and Alternate) · Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors · Temecula/Murrieta Transportation/Traffic Committee (2 Members) · Trails Master Plan Development Committee · WRCOG Representative · Senior Center Expansion Design Committee (Member and Alternate) 14.3 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Advisory Committees: · City's General Plan Update Committee · Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee R:\Minutes\012301 20 · Economic DevelopmentJOId Town Steering Committee · Finance Committee · Joint City Council/Temecula Valley Unified School District Committee · Library Task Force · Old Town Temecula Community Theater Ad Hoc Committee/Theater Advisory Committee · PublicWorks/Facilities Committee 14.4 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Council Subcommittees: · Children's Museum Ad Hoc Subcommittee · Development Overlay Subcommittee · Electrical NeedsAd Hoc Subcommittee · Hotel Conference Center Ad Hoc Council Subcommittee · Lennar Project Subcommittee · Roripaugh Ranch Annexation Ad Hoc Subcommittee · SAF-T-NET Subcommittee (one Councilmember and one Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner) · Sports ParkAd Hoc Subcommittee · Via Cordoba Subcommittee · Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee · Water Park Subcommittee · Wolf Creek Development Agreement Council Ad Hoc Committee MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue this item to the February 13, 2001, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 15 State Ballot Initiative (Requested by Councilman Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Provide direction to the City Attorney and staff regarding drafting of a State Ballot Initiative which would provide funding for public transportation projects. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue this item to the February 27, 2001, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 16 City Council Meetin,q Adiournment Time (Requested by Councilman Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Provide direction to staff whether to amend Ordinance No. 2.04.020 regarding the time of adjournment for City Council meetings. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue this item to the February 13, 2001, City Cduncil meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\012301 21 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No comments. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 11:03 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 13, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:~linutes\012301 22 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $962,249.68. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- ] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of April, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/05/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/12/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/24/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/12/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/24/91 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 192 193 ~94 210 261 28O 30O 320 33O 34O 380 471 GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING COMMUNI~( SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12ADMIN EXPENSE FUND RDA-REDEVELOPMENT INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES RDA - DEBT SERVICE CFD 98-1 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND $ 320,942.04 67,591.41 130,616.09 45.76 27,881.15 1,132.94 105,111.21 8,037.00 14,698.87 4,295.69 19,006.78 12,622.51 1,250.00 2,750.00 $ 175,508.53 340,558.32 220,497.94 225,684.89 $ 962,249.6~8 $ 736,564.79 001 165 190 192 193 194 280 300 32O 330 34O GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-REDEVELOPMENT INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER 165,256.24 3,829.50 37,615.67 59.34 2,905.46 361 1 ,~63.93 764.58 6,629.80 1,866.31 4,432.37 225,684.89 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 04/05/01 08:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE 471 CFD 98-1ADM]N EXPENSE FUND TOTAL AHOUNT 30,281.72 15,098.05 16,652.58 111.59 81,251.55 8,000.00 7,571.25 4,561.78 252.38 7,127.63 1,250.00 2,750.00 1~5,508.53 VOUCHRE2 04/05/01 08:52 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCNER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 68385 04/05/01 004148 A T & T LONG DISTANCE CHRGS:POLICE DPT 001-170-999-5208 60.20 60.20 68386 04/o5/01 000434 ACCELA.COM SGL DATA BASE LICENSE FEE 320-199-999-5250 3,232.50 3,232.50 68387 04/05/01 004487 AD-A-SIGN FAC IMPR PRGM:M&H ART & CUSTOM 165-199-813-5804 1,562.80 1,562.80 68388 04/05/01 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC OLO TWN BILLBOARD AB:RANCHO CA 280-199-999-5362 1,751.00 1,751.00 68389 04/05/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE CFD 98-1 CONSULTING SERVICES 471-199-999-5248 5,500.00 68389 04/05/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE CEO 88-12 CONSULTING SERVICES 261-199-999-5248 6,000.00 68389 04/05/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE CREDIT:3RD & 4TH GTR BILLING 471-199-999-5248 2,750.00- 68389 04/05/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE CREDIT:3RD & 4TH QTR BILLING 261-199-999-5248 3,000.00- 5,750.00 68390 04/05/01 AMERICAN ASSN OF CODE MEMBERSHIP:MARIANNE L. SALAZAR 001-161-999-5226 45.00 45.00 68391 04/05/01 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:D.UBNOSKE 001-161-999-5226 246.00 246.00 68392 04/05/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 03/17 BRUNER 001-162-999-5118 177.24 68392 04/05/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 03/17 SIMPKINS 001-161-999-5118 465.08 642.32 68393 04/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WTR SVCS:MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5250 179.24 68393 04/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WTR SVES: CRC 190-182-999-5250 59.88 68393 04/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLEO WTR SVCS: CiTY HALL 340-199-701-5250 467.37 706.49 68394 04/05/01 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT INC REPAIR & MAINT OF TCSD TRACTOR 190-180-999-5214 175.91 175.91 68395 04/05/01 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 105.00 68395 04/05/0t 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCHANDISE 001-1665 105.00 68395 04/05/01 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE RESALE MERCNANDiSE 001-1~5 118.00 328.00 68396 04/05/01 ASEBEDO, DEBB! REFUND: SECURITY DEPPSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 68397 04/05/01 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER INSTALL CLOCK/REDUCE LGHT:OLD 001-164-603-5212 1,400.00 68397 04/05/01 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER INSTALL 41LGHT CTRL SENSORS 340-199-701-5212 1,230.00 2,630.00 68398 04/05/01 BARRELS UNLIMITED, INC. 10 USED OAK BARRELS:OLD TWN 001-164-603-5218 732.34 732.34 68399 04/05/01 004176 BROADWING LONG DISTANCE & INTERNET SVCS 320-199-999-5208 1,195.00 1,195.00 68400 04/05/01 000924 C A P P O, INC. MEMBERSHIP:MARY VOLLMUTH 001-140-999-5226 90.00 90.00 68401 04/05/01 000901 C P R S DISTRICT XI CPR AWRD CEREMONY:STAFF/RECIPI 190-180-999-5260 210.00 210.00 68402 04/05/01 CAL PLANNING & DEVELOPM ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTION:CP&DR 001-161-999-5228 239.00 239.00 68403 04/05/01 000832 CALIF PUBLIC PARKING AS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:JIM DOMENOE 001-170-999-5226 100.00 100.00 68404 04/05/01 COOKE, TELEClA REFUND: TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 30.00 30.00 68405 04/05/01 CRUZ-HAZEL~ GRISELA REFUND: BABY BOPPERS MOM & ME 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/05/01 08:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGI~FER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68406 04/05/01 001393 DATA TICKET INC 68407 04/05/01 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE C 68407 04/05/01 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE C 68408 04/05/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN 68409 04/05/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 68409 04/05/01 001380 E B I EMPLOYMENT BERVIC 68409 04/05/01 001580 E S I EHPLOYMENT SERVIC 68410 04/05/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68410 04/05/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68411 04/05/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 68411 04/05/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 68412 04/05/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 68412 04/05/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 68412 04/05/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 68413 04/05/01 003270 FAUST PRINTING INC 68413 04/05/01 003270 FAUST PRINTING INC 68/,14 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68614 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST DANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68614 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68414 04/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 68415 04/05/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS 68415 04/05/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS 68415 04/05/01 004455 GATEWAY COMPUTERS 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 1NC 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER FEB PARKING CITATION PROCESSIN 001-170-999-5250 JAN PRGS:PALA BRDG LDS P~97-15 210-165-631-5804 RETENTiON:JAN LDB PALA P~97-15 210-2035 EOC GENERATOR CARB DIESEL #2 340-199-701-5215 TEMP HELP W/E 03/09 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 03/09 HANSEN TEMP HELP W/E 03/09 HANSEN 001-120-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 190-180-999-5118 CRC LIGHT FIXTURE LENSES SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 REFSHMNTS:COUNCIL MEETING 3/27 001-100-999-5250 REFRSHMNT:STATE TOURISM OFFICI 001-111-999-5270 FAC IMPR PROM:HEALTH INS AGENC BANNER:WELCOME TO OLD TO~N SALES TAX 280-199-813-5804 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 TEMECULA PRESENTATION FOLOER SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5270 XX-7824 COMERCHERO:LEAGUE:WSHG XX-9798 STONE:LEAGUE CF WSHGTN XX-9277 R.ROBERTS:LEAGUE:WSHGT XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:CSMFO CF/RTL XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGS XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTGB XX-1405 UBNOSKE:APA/BW AIR COM XX-1405 UBNOSKE:APA/BW AIR COM XX-1405 UBNOSKE:APA/SW AIR COM XX-1405 UBNOSKE:APA/SW AiR COM XX-0515 THORNHILL:LEAGUE-COMM XX-0515 THORNHILL:LEAGUE-DU XX-0432 ELMO:BW AIR PZ-ER:HTL XX-0432 ELMO:SW AIR PZ-ER:HTL XXo0432 ELMO:SW AIR PZ-ER:HTL 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-140-999-5258 001-150-999-5261 001-150-999-5260 001-161-999-5228 001-161-999-5260 001-161-999-5258 001-161-999-5272 001-161-999-5272 001-161-999-5258 001-162-999-5261 001-162-999-5260 001-162-999-5258 xx-1143 PARKER:CPRS CF/HTL-CAR 190-1990 2 COMPUTERS:POLICE:V935 COMP. FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 001-170-999-5604 001-170-999-5604 HARDWARE SUPPLIES-SPEC EVENTS HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TRAFFIC DIV HAROWARE SUPPLIES-PW MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES-CRC 190-183-999-5370 001-164-602-5242 001-164-601-5218 340-199-701-5212 190-180-999-5242 190-182-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 476.75 69,653.10 6,965.31- 957.57 325.44 1,352.61 193.23 121.50 9.11 187.46 403.13 1,606.50 105.63 7.92 3,735.00 280.13 1,016.94 1,134.32 2,545.45 767.81 2.50 115.50 69.00 51.86 105.50 384.50 1,400.00 365.67 558.00 50.44 552.26 1,053.41 2,614.00 176.00 191.42 39.19 141.47 127.97 108.71 42.99 114.77 CHECK AMOUNT 476.75 62,687.79 957.57 1,871.28 130.61 590.59 1,720.05 4,015.13 10,17'3.16 2,981.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 04/05/01 08:52 VCXJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS BARDWARE INC 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE IHC 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE IHC 68416 04/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 68416 04/05/01 0001~ HANKS HARDWARE INC 68417 04/05/01 004471 HWY 52 68418 04/05/01 003319 INLAND ENTERTAINMEHT RO 68419 04/05/01 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO 68419 04/05/01 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO 68420 04/05/01 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 68421 04/05/01 004413 KLA~L~TH 8AY 68421 04/05/01 004413 KLAMATH SAY 68422 04/05/01 000209 L & M FERTILIZER IBC 68423 04/05/01 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA 68424 04/05/01 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01. 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68425 04/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 68426 04/05/01 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL 68427 04/05/01 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 68428 04/05/01 003964 OFFICE DEPOT SUSINESS S 68429 04/05/01 002105 OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE 68429 04/05/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 68429 04/05/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 68430 04/05/01 002668 C~4EGA LAKE SERVICES ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT HARDWARE SUPPLIES-RECREATION 190-187-999-5301 HARDWARE SUPPLIES-BUILD&SAFETY 001-162-999-5242 HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL HARDWARE SUPPLIES - PARKS NAROWARE SUPPLIES - SR CTR HARDWARE SUPPLIES - ~CC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MUSEUM HARDWARE SUPPLIES - MUSEUM 340-199-701-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-185-999-5212 190-185-999-5301 BLUE GRASS PERFORMERS 3/24-25 280-199-999-5362 AD:OLD TWB BLUEGRASS FESTIVAL 280-199-999-5362 BROADCASTING:BLUE GRASS FESTIV 280-199-999-5362 BROADCASTING:BLUE GRASS FESTIV 280-199-999-5362 TEMP HELP W/E 03/18 HALL 001-140-999-5118 MAGNET CITY BUSINESS CARDS SALES TAX 001-170-999-5292 001-170-999-5292 MNTC SUPPLIES:TCSD ~ORK CREW 190-180-999-5212 03/20-28/01 CONSULTING SVCS 001-161-999-5248 CONSULTING SVCS:WESTERN DAYS 280-199-999-5250 QTY 1000 ENVELOPES - FINANCE SALES TAX GTY 2000 ENVELOPES-CH OFFICE SALES TAX QTY 2000 ENVELOPES - HR DEPT SALES TAX QTY 7000 ENVELOPES - FINANCE SALES TAX QTY 1000 ENVELOPES - B&S DEPT 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-110-999-5222 001-150-999-5222 001-150-999-5222 001-140-999'5222 001-140-999-5222 001-162-999-5222 ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES 380-199-999-5248 VARIOIJS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR 001-150-999-5254 OFFICE SUPPLIES - PO MAIN STN 001-170-999-5220 CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT CITY VEBICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 APR DUCK POND WATER MAINT SVCS 190-180-999-5250 210.38 12.89 32.64 980.50 66.96 11.14 43.96 17.63 1,000.00 213.75 200,00 800.00 106.40 255.52 18.26 23.00 1,027.80 2,000.00 89.44 6.71 168.79 12.66 168.79 12.66 344.58 25.84 96.15 1,250.00 135.00 7'7.53 59.95 140.95 66.45 800.00 CHECK AMOUNT 1,951.20 1,000.00 213.75 1,000.00 106.40 273.78 23.00 1,027.80 2,000.00 925.62 1,250,00 135.00 77.53 267.35 800.00 68431 04/05/01 004475 P A S SYSTEMS INTERNATI PASSIVE ALCOHOL SENSOR:PAS III 001-170-502-5610 1,230.00 68431 04/05/01 004475 P A S SYSTEMS INTERNATI FREIGHT 001-170-502-5610 9.58 1,239.58 VOUCHRE2 04/05/01 08:52 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT 68432 04/05/01 004319 PACIFIC ROOFING & DESIG PRGS PHT#2:DESILT POND:PWO0-01 210-190-171-5804 13,317.96 68~32 04/05/01 004319 PACIFIC ROOFING & DESIG PRGS PMT#2:DESILT POND:PWO0-01 210-190-171-5804 3,550.00 68432 04/05/01 004319 PACIFIC ROOFING & DESI6 RET N/H PMT#2:DESZLT POND:O001 210-2035 1,686.80- 68~33 04/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION GIFTS 190-183-999-5370 820.00 68/,33 04/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370 60.21 68433 04/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE CREDIT:SALES TAX CHRG OM SETUP 190-183-999-5370 3.96- 68434 04/05/01 000359 PARKER, HERMAN 68435 04/05/01 PARTOMO, FELIX REIMB:CPRS CONF:3/13-17/01 190-180-999-5258 60.72 REFUND:WEED ABATEMEHT:~/DO00002 001-1215 270.30 68436 04/05/01 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA TCC RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5301 70.42 68436 04/05/01 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA EMP RECOGNITION SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 40.82 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 42.46 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 5.99 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-18~-999-5371 13.02 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-18/*-999-5301 8.61 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 16.13 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 1.61 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 21.48 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 15.00 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT 190-18~-999-5320 11.60 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 6.34 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 42.89 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5220 5.36 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5261 18.46 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 18.24 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMRURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 24.00 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5260 7.23 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 16,94 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-184-999-5301 1.66 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5230 11.75 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMRURSEMENT 001-164-601-5260 30.00 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5220 11.80 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 31.68 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 50.00 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-9<29-5350 25.00 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 42.19 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 9.99 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSE[iENT 001-140-999-5260 57.10 68437 04/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 22.43 68439 04/05/01 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 34.85 68439 04/05/01 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 50.85 68439 04/05/01 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-150-999-5230 13.75 68440 04/05/01 001364 R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC 30.48 REPAIR/MAINT-WINCHESTER CRK PK 190-180-999-5212 68441 04/05/01 002612 RADIO SHACK IRC MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 58.37 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 15,181.16 876.25 60.72 270.30 111.24 568.96 99.45 30.48 58.37 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/05/01 08:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME OESCRIPTIOM NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 68442 04/05/01 004468 RANCH MUFFLER RE-ROUTE EXHAUST PIPE/PW TRUCK 001-16~-601-5214 115.00 68442 04/05/01 004468 RANCH MUFFLER SALES TAX 001-164-601-5214 4.13 119.13 68443 04/05/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST MAR 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING MTR 001-16~-601-5250 342.06 68443 04/05/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST MAR 02-79-10100-1NW SPRTS PRK 190-180-999-5240 65.25 407.31 68444 04/05/01 000266 RIGHTWAY PORTABLE TOILETS/OEMO ON PUJOL 165-199-999-5250 145.75 68444 04/05/01 000266 RIGHTWAY APR EQUIP RENTAL - RIVERTON PK 190-180-999-5238 62.88 208.63 68445 04/05/01 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD CONT PLAN CK FEES FOR PALA RD IMPRV 210-165-603-5802 123.30 123.30 68446 04/05/01 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC MISC SUPPLIES PW STENCIL TRUCK 001-16~.-601-5218 1,026.56 1,026.56 68447 04/05/01 003027 RODFTEK RES IMPRV PRGM:P.DEROEUX 165-199-813-5804 3,523.50 68447 04/05/01 003027 RODFTEK CREDIT:CLIENT'S PORTION OF PMT 165-199-813-5804 350.00- 3,1~.50 68448 04/05/01 003001 ROSS FENCE COHPANY RES IMPRV PRGM: A. DANKINS 165-199-813-5804 1,392.00 68448 04/05/01 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES IMPRV PROM: S. SPERA 165-199-813-5804 3,859.00 5,251.00 68449 04/05/01 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS 190-183-999-5320 67.86 67.86 68/*50 04/05/01 S.A.F.E. S.A.F.E. 8ENEFIT:O4/18/O1:R.R. 001-100-999-5260 75.00 75.00 68451 04/05/01 SANCHEZ, VIOLA REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 65.00 65.00 68/*52 04/05/01 SANTA, RUTH REFUND:DANCE-BALLROOM 190-183-4982 43.00 43.00 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-10-747-1393 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 25.58 68/*53 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319 277.86 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2-22-496-3439 WINCHESTER RO 190-180-999-5319 3,090.07 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-22-231-4502 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 353.28 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 4,152.10 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 711.59 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5240 25.92 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EOISON HAR 2-19-999-9442 VARIOUS MTRS 190-180-999-5319 1,927.04 68453 04/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO RD 190-180-999-5319 184.08 10,747.52 68454 04/05/01 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHL ADULT SOFTBALL BO0~S WNTR/FALL 190-187-999-5301 8~0.00 840.00 68455 04/05/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CRC PEST CONTROL SERVICES 190-182-999-5250 90.00 90.00 68456 04/05/01 004207 STEINY & COMPANY INC REL RETENTION:TRF SGNL UPGRADE 210-2035 2,179.30 2,179.30 68457 04/05/01 003960 TEMECULA SECURITY FENCI RES IMPRV PRGM: J. BENZING 165-199-813-5804 4,965.00 4,965.00 68458 04/05/01 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY NAMETAGE FOR H. MILLER - TCSD 190-185-999-5222 6.99 6.99 68459 04/05/01 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT LOCKSMITH SVCS:TEMEKU HILLS PK 190-180-999-5212 54.01 68459 04/05/01 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT LOCKSMITH SVCS:TEMEKU HILLS PK 190-180-999-5212 45.99 6~59 04/05/01 004274 TEHECULA VALLEY SECURIT LOCKSMITH SVCS:PALOHA D.S.PARK 190-180-999-5212 50.00 150.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 04/05/01 08:52 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68460 04/05/01 001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES 68461 04/05/01 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE dUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68462 04/05/01 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 68463 04/05/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 68463 04/05/01 003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL 68464 04/05/01 004486 UNION 76 68465 04/05/01 004440 UNIVERSITY PROOUCTS INC 68466 04/05/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 68467 04/05/01 003191 WEDEKING, BRUCE 68460 04/05/01 003835 WEST COAST SUPPLY COMPA 68468 04/05/01 003835 WEST COAST SUPPLY CGMPA 68468 04/05/01 003835 WEST COAST SUPPLY COMPA 68469 04/05/01 000570 WIMBERLY, VALERIE 68470 04/05/01 WOLNICK, GLORIA 68471 04/05/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 68471 04/05/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 68471 04/05/01 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 68472 04/05/01 003607 XPECT FIRST AID 68472 04/05/01 003607 XPECT FIRST AID ITEM AOCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER FEB CONSULT SVCS:MURRIETA CRK 210-165-707-5801 REPAIR PW MAINT EQUIPMENT 001-164-601-5218 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 ARBITRAGE REBATE RPR'~-88-12/92 261-199-999-5248 ARBITRAGE REBATE RPRT-88-12/98 261-199-999-5248 CITY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 MUSEUM SUPPLIES 190-185-999-5250 I~AR XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 REIMB:CPRS C0NF:3/13-17/01 190-180-999-5258 GAS SENSOR BATTERIES-PW MAINT FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-16~-601-5218 REIMB:REFRESHMNTS:CE~ MEETING 001-161-999-5260 REINB:LA TRAVEL SHON:3/2-3/01 001-111-999-5270 FEB LEASE DC220 COPIER 330-2800 FEB MNTC/SUPPLIES DC220 COPIER 330-1~-999-5217 FEB INTEREST DC220 COPIER 330-199-999-5391 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FOR TCC FIRST AID SUPPLIES F~R MPSC 190-184-999-5301 190-181-~-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 1,080.00 160.00 220.00 230.40 384.00 268.80 230.40 384.00 230.40 115.20 268.80 440.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 21.75 673.95 75.91 188.06 270.00 15.00 20.25 66.90 165.42 128.10 76.98 47.30 101.98 101.98 CHECK AMOUNT 1,080.00 160.00 2,772.00 5,000.00 21.75 673.95 75.91 188.06 305.25 66.90 165.42 252.38 203.96 TOTAL CHECKS 175,508.53 VCXJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 18 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LON/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 213,611.47 17,893.36 52,344.29 45.76 2,941.56 1,132.94 11,0T?.37 6,624.37 410.36 14,445,00 12,370.13 ?,661.71 TOTAL 340,558.32 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCBER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERB 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERB 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERB 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERB 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PERS 21623 04/12/01 000246 PBRS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 217O9 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 217O9 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PEES 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS 21709 04/12/01 000245 PERS CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION iEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET iEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEESv RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEESv RETIRE 000246 PERB RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERB RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEESv RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA :HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA tEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHZELD HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET NEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PA(CARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PA(CARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PA(CARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PC HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2130 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001'2090 190-2090 193-2090 194-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 ITEM AMOUNT 27,156.33 651.49 4,544.83 11.61 415.42 68.20 282.59 127.80 26.51 1 · 003.44 206.19 589.34 182.91 96.59 1 19,07 .05 1.82 .36 .92 .46 3.72 1.39 2.65 3,042.39 254.63 1,141.99 84.87 97.00 244.07 1,594.12 468.53 890.72 4,922.45 1,438.39 59.18 29.55 ?68.96 2,120.00 4,149.17 944.84 244.62 144.45 738.00 4,056.44 1,028.80 100.76 2,037.16 166.98 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 35,4~5.56 30,768.07 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 774738 04/12/01 000283 7747~8 04/12/01 000285 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 7747~8 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 7~4738 04/12/01 000283 7747~8 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774?38 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000283 774738 04/12/01 000285 774738 04/12/01 000283 ITEM AMOUNT INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 29,220.64 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000285 FEDERAL 165-2070 477.97 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,939.67 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 FEDERAL 192-2070 15.84 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 354.90 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 72.88 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 191.41 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 74.25 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 FEDERAL 320~2070 1,090.70 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 550-2070 232.54 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 569.39 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 6,441.49 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 150.22 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,371.;'7 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.62 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 105.78 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 15.56 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 70.41 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 29.24 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 314.08 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 65.71 INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 340-2070 159.21 INSTATAX (IRS) OVERPAYMENT OF 2000 4TH QTR 001-2070 6.55- 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SD! 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774~91 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EO0) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 774791 04/12/01 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 001-2070 165-2070 190~2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330~2070 340-2070 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 000 00/00/00 000245 PENS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000 00/00/00 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000 00/00/00 000245 PENS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000 00/00/00 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000 00/00/00 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000 00/00/00 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 000 00/00/00 000245 PENS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 SLSHIELD 67.30 2.60 110.36 2.53 .39 8.08 5.85 4.44 7,849.53 139.56 1,081.58 4.68 80.34 20.06 61.35 15.34 231.89 54.88 129.48 158.61 123.68 119.01 41.22 8.13 55.47 54.51 CHECK AMOUNT 45,959.93 9,870.24 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 000 00/00/00 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS HEALTH INSUR. PRE 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68476 04/12/01 003552 A F L A C 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 684~7 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 684?7 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VZSION PLANS 68477 04/12/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 68478 04/12/01 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL 68479 04/12/01 002662 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTR 68479 04/12/01 002662 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTR 68479 04/12/01 002662 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTR 68480 04/12/01 00287? ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 68480 04/12/01 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 68481 04/12/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 68481 04/12/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE 68482 04/12/01 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ITEM DESCRIPTION 000245 CIGNA 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISER 000245 PACCARE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS REV 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 CANCER 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 EXP PROT 003552 HOSP IC 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 003552 STD 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS DUCK POND PRE-BAIT PI3GRAM DUCK POND:DUCK & GEESE REMOVAL DUCK POND:DUCK & GEESE REMOVAL TRANSPORTATION:LIBRARy EXCURSI TRANSPORTATION:LIBRARY EXCURSI CITY LIMITS 8LODO DRAWS-PD/CHP CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP SUBSCRIPTION:ZONING NEWS ACCOUNT NUMSER 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 001-2330 190-2330 320-2330 001-2330 001-2330 190-2330 193-2330 194-2330 340-2330 001-2310 165-2310 190-2310 193-2310 194-2310 280-2310 330-2310 340-2310 190-186-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-170-999-5328 001-170-999-5328 001-161-999-5228 ITEM AMOUNT 35.78 143.43 31.24 .36 23.43 119.46 5.42 2.32 93.56 1,015.63- 357.70 14.34 14.34 4.78 14.34 156.20 55.80 27.90 17.50 494.40 91.20 9.60 3.20 20.80 729.49 17.60 89.04 5.58 1.67 5.86 5.58 42.23 18.86 225.00 325.00 200,00 320.00 97.10 63.00 378.00 60.00 CHECK AMOUNT .00 1,282.10 897.05 18.86 750.00 417.10 441.00 60.00 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPR1DE UNIFORM SERV RAR RAT/TO~EL RENTAL:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 134.25 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV MAR MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5250 57.75 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMRER DATE NUMBER NAME 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68485 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE URIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 6~83 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRZDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 6848~ 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68/*83 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68485 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68483 04/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV 68484 04/12/01 ANDERSON, KATHY 68485 04/12/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68486 04/12/01 001561 ARCH 68487 04/12/01 003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 68488 04/12/01 000122 68489 04/12/01 68490 04/12/01 68490 04/12/01 68491 04/12/01 68491 04/12/01 68492 04/12/01 B S N SPORTS 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA 004206 BANUELOS, TERESA 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV 003126 BOOHGAARDEN, DENNIS 68493 04/12/01 004059 68493 04/12/01 004059 68493 04/12/01 004059 68493 04/12/01 004059 68494 04/12/01 68495 04/12/01 68496 04/12/01 DOWLEY, DAVID BOWLEY, DAVID BO~LEY, DAVID BOWLEY, DAVID 003582 BROWN JR., WILLIAM E. BUSINESS FURN. SOLUTION 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMRER NAR MAT/TO~EL RENTAL:SH CTR HAR NAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CRC MAR NAT/TO~EL RENTAL:TCC NAR NAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MUSEUM NAR UNIFORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS MAR UNIFORMS FOR TCSD MNTC CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TENP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES CREDIT: TEMP ENERGY CHARGES 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 190-105-999-5250 REFUND: ARTS/CRAFTS-DRAWING 190-183-4982 TEMP HELP W/E 03/24 SIMPKINS 001-161-999-5118 NAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS HAH PAGING/RENTAL SVCS MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS NAR PAGING/RERTAL SVCS MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVC$ MAR PAGING/RENTAL SVCS MAR:MICROFILM OFFSITE STORAGE 001-110-999-5238 001-150-999-5250 330-1990 190-180-999-5238 001'164-601-5238 001-170-999-5238 001-120-999-527T RECREATION SUPPLIES:TEEN ROOM TCC FREEZER REPAIR SVCS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-182-999-5301 190-184-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 REPAIR PW MNTC TRAILER/VACTRON 001-164-601-5214 REGRADE CORNER OF YNEZ/VALLEJO 001-164-601-5402 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MILEAGE REIMB-PW SIGNAL TECH REFUND: SPORTS-EB MENS LEAGUE 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5530 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 001-164-602-5262 190-183-4994 280-199-999-5234 OLD TWN RESTRCX~M RENTAL ITEM AMOUNT 79.20 120.30 61.20 54.55 186.50 103.25 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 15.00- 36.00 468.00 40.65 40.65 40.65 484.50 81.30 153.90 125.50 199.39 156.88 170.00 170.00 1,625.00 2,790.00 444.00 129.60 230.40 43.20 28.80 38.64 40.00 826.00 CHECK AMOUNT 677.00 36.00 468.00 841.65 125.50 199.39 156.88 340.00 4,415.00 444.00 432.00 38.64 40.00 826.00 VOUEHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMGER 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68497 68499 68500 68501 68501 68502 68502 68503 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMGER AMOUNT 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 003553 c GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C 6NA 003553 LTD 001-2380 1,623.26 003553 LTD 165-2380 39.10 003553 LTD 190-2380 299.92 003553 LTD 192-2380 .71 003553 LTD 193-2380 26.38 003553 LTD 194-2380 6.08 003553 LTD 280-2380 17.29 003553 LTD 300-2380 7.99 003553 LTD 320-2380 66.99 003553 LTD 330-2380 13.45 003553 LTD 340-2380 37.67 003553 STD 001-2500 2,265.79 003553 STD 165-2500 54.57 003553 STD 190-2500 418.65 003553 STD 192-2500 .99 003553 STD 193-2500 36.81 003553 STD 194-2500 8.49 003553 STD 200-2500 24.15 003553 STD 300-2500 11.15 003553 STD 320-2500 93.49 003553 STD 330-2500 18.78 003553 STD 340-2500 52.59 003138 CAL MAT PW PATCH TRUCK MATER]ALS 001-16~-601-5218 003138 CAL MAT PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS 001-164-601-5218 002566 CALIF STATE OF BOARD OF 002566 CALIF STATE OF SOARD OF 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 002520 CALIF T'S BY TRANSCEND 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY VAIL RANCH ANNE)L~TION FEES VAIL RANCH ANNEXATION FEES 001-110-999-5307 001-161-999-5250 T-SHIRTS/HATS:MAKE A DIF EVENT 194-180-999-5250 SALES TAX 194-180-999-5250 RECREATION SUPPLIES: TCC 190-184-999-5301 205.72 1,684.96 2,000.00 1,200.00 766.80 57.51 25.70 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE [NS 001-2360 645.13 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE [NS 165-2360 13.01 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 190-2360 133.26 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 192-2360 .33 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 193-2360 12.68 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 194-2360 2.59 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE 1NS 280-2360 6.49 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 300-2360 3.24 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 320-2360 26.00 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 330-2360 9.~5 68504 04/12/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 340-2360 18.52 04/12/01 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 685O5 352.00 CHECK AMOUNT 5,124.30 205.72 1,684.96 3,200.00 824.31 25.70 871.00 352.00 68506 04/12/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFSHMNTS:TRNG 1ST RESPONDER 001-150-999-5261 118.10 68506 04/12/01 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFSHMNTS:TRNG IST RESPONDER 001-150-999-5261 118.10 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 68506 04/12/01 002534 68506 04/12/01 002534 68506 04/12/01 002534 68507 04/12/01 004203 68508 04/12/01 004203 68509 04/12/01 001197 VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER CATERERS CAFE CATERERS CAFE CATERERS CAFE REFSHMENTS:TRNG 1ST RESPOMDER REFSHMNTS:TRNG 1ST RESPONDER REFSHMNTS:OM BUSINESS MTG CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO 004203 AR CHILD CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIO CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE 68510 04/12/01 CLARK, JOHN 001-150-999-5261 001-150-999-5261 001-110-999-5260 190-2140 RE-ISSUE CK:PAYROLL DEDUCTION 190-2140 CNOCO CARD:SD/OC CONCIERGE MTG 001-111-999-5270 REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCCER 190-183-4982 68511 04/12/01 COLLINS, DARROLYN REFUND: SPORTS-CS MENS LEAGUE 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68512 04/12/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 68513 04/12/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET IL4DIO FOR TCSD TRUCK #01-068 68513 04/12/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET ANTENNA 68513 04/12/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET OUTSIDE SPEAKER 68513 04/12/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET LABOR 68513 04/12/01 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET SALES TAX 68514 04/12/01 CRANDELL, MARIE 68515 04/12/01 001320 CROUE-PELLETIER, JULIE 68516 04/12/01 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC REFUND: GYMNASTICS-RHYTH KIDZ REIMB:CPRS CONF:3/14-3/18/01 PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS CONSULTANT SVC:NNTC FAC PHASE3 REPAIR HOT WATER LINE:STN 8~ RES IMPRV PRGM:SPERA,SHAWN 68517 04/12/01 003681 DAVIDSOM & ALLEN, ARCHI 68518 04/12/01 004450 DENNIS A HIBBERT PLUMBI 68519 04/12/01 002954 DIAMOND GARAGE 68520 04/12/01 004470 DOWN THE ROAD BLUEGRASS OLD TWN ENTERTAINMENT:3/24/01 68520 04/12/01 004470 DOWN THE ROAD BLUEGRASS OLD TWN ENTERTAINMENT:3/25/01 68521 04/12/01 004192 DOUNS COHMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 DCR~NS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLFS 68521 04/12/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 OCR~NS COHMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES ~521 04/12/01 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 68521 04/12/01 004192 DONRS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-183-4994 001-2120 190-2120 193-2120 194-2120 330-2120 340-2120 340-199-701-5610 340-199-701-5610 340-199o701-5610 340-199-701-5610 340-199-701-5610 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5258 001-164-601-5218 210-190-158-5802 001-171-999-5212 165-199-813-5804 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5362 190-180-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 280-199-999-5262 001-161-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 001-111-999-5262 001-165-999-5263 001-164-601-5263 001-164-604-5263 ITEM AMOUNT 118.10 118.10 54.14 6.97 12.50 85.00 25.00 40.00 118.50 5.60 .60 .20 5.50 .60 915.00 60.55 65.00 180.00 78.04 36.00 242.22 6.00 44.39 950.00 1,025.00 500.00 500.00 205.84 126.94 34.93 83.14 24.08 21.99 82.49 368.27 41.34 CHECK AMOUNT 526.54 6.97 12.50 85.00 25.00 40.00 131.00 1,298.59 36.00 242.22 6.00 44.39 950.00 1,025.00 1,000.00 989.02 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUHBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 68522 04/12/01 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 68523 04/12/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68523 04/12/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP 68523 04/12/01 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP TEMP HELP W/E 03/23 RUSH TEMP HELP W/E 03/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 03/23 EBON TEMP HELP W/E 03/23 THURSTON TEMP HELP N/E 03/23 BRCR~N TEMP HELP N/E 03/23 VOSHALL TEMP HELP N/E 03/23 OBMANN TEMP HELP N/E 03/23 LEER CRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SALES TAX CITY HALL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5118 340-199-701-5118 340-199-702-5118 190-186-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 1,663.50 853.80 28~.60 1,465.60 4,299.7~ 2,075.20 1,520.80 2,286.40 342.30 25.67 77.40 14,449.65 445.37 68524 04/12/01 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 68524 04/12/01 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 6B525 04/12/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN 68525 04/12/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN CREDIT:INVOICE EXCEEDS P.O. MAR 2001 PLAN CHECK SVCS REFSHMNTS:LIBRARY EXCURSION SALES TAX 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 190-185-999-5250 190-185-999-5250 20,531.48- 36,225.00 17~.25 12.99 15,693.52 186.24 68526 04/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAR LDSC IMPRV:RCSDP-CREEK 190-180-999-5212 225.00 225.00 68527 04/12/01 002037 EXPANETS 68528 04/12/01 000478 FAST SIGHS QTRLY TELEPHONE MNTC AGREEMENT 320-199-999-5215 LABELS FOR MUSEUM EXHIBITS 190-185-999-5250 2,256.00 37.52 2,256.00 37.52 6B529 04/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68529 04/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS IHt 68529 04/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68529 04/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68529 04/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 68530 04/12/01 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 00017'/ 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 000177 68531 04/12/01 00017'/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFF]CE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENN]ES OFF]CE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT EXPRESS MAIL SERVICEG EXPRESS MAIL SERVICEG EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-111-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-165-999-5230 001-1990 DAY TIMER SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5220 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CM DEPT 001-110-999-5220 MISC OFF]CE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5220 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLRK 001-120-999-5220 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:COPY CTR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:COPY CTR MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:BE DEPT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PLANNING MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:B&S DEPT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FIRE DEPT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FIRE DEPT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA/LO~-M MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:RDA/LOt4-M 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 190-185o999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 165-199-999-5220 280-199-999-5220 26.06 13.58 12.92 22.00 15.81 47.52 103.30 33.05 447.54 22.32 202.75 132.78 57.74 259.11 140.06 81.94 25.22 400.56 2.83 75.18 443.96 73.22 7~.21 90.37 47.52 2,574.7'/ VODCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGIbrER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUHBER DATE 68532 04/12/01 68533 04/12/01 68534 04/12/01 68535 04/12/01 68536 04/12/01 68537 04/12/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME GOEHRS, STAR 004159 GOOOENOUGH, DONNA 004133 H D L SOFTWARE LLC 000]78 HAFELI, THOMAS HAMBY, CHRISTINE 000186 HANKS HARDWARE ING ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCCER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BUSINESS LICENSE SOFTWARE MNTC REIMS:NOVELL ADMIN MANUALS REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCCER HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FIRE OEPT ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5228 190-183-4982 001-171-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 25.00 84.00 4,400.00 170.11 25.00 152.98 CHECK AMOUNT 25.00 84.00 4,400.00 170.11 25.00 152.98 68538 04/12/01 002372 HARMON, JUDY 68539 04/12/01 003895 HAROLD, MARK S. 68540 04/12/01 HARRIS, PEGGIE 68541 04/12/01 HAYNES, AMELIA 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 GIGHMARK lNG 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 H]GHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC · 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK ]NC 68542 04/12/01 002107 NIGHMARK INC " 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK lNG 68542 04/12/01 002107 H]GHMARK ]NC 68542 04/12/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 68542 04/12/01 002107 NIGHMARK INC 68543 04/12/01 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 68543 04/12/01 001013 NINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 68544 04/12/01 HOLLANDER, DEBORAH 68545 04/12/01 000193 I C M A 68546 04/12/01 68546 04/12/01 68546 04/12/01 68546 04/12/01 68546 04/12/01 · 68546 04/12/01 68546 04/12/01 68547 04/12/01 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REIMB:CBO CERTIFICATION REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCCER REFUND: SI(YNAWKS-SOCCER 002107 VL ADVAN 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VL REVER 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 00E107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE SALES TAX CONSULTING SERVICES SALES TAX RECOVERY FEES REFUND: SKYHAWK$-SOCCER WORKBOOK:WORKING TOGETHER TRNG 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMp 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-183-999-5330 001-162-999-5261 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-140-999-5248 001-140-999-5248 190-183-4982 001-110-999-5228 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 190'186-999-5250 438.64 180.00 25.OO 25.00 227.50 207.00 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 215.30- 194.80 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 900.00 4,491.52 50.00 49.80 2,830.74 445.85 474.06 40.01 16.50 166.79 50.00 380.55 438.64 180.00 25.00 25.00 455.00 5,391.52 50.00 49.80 4,023.95 380.55 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK HUMBER DATE 68548 04/12/01 68549 04/12/01 68550 04/12/01 68551 04/12/01 68552 04/12/01 68553 04/12/01 68554 04/12/01 68554 04/12/01 68555 04/12/01 68555 04/12/01 68556 04/12/01 6855? 04/12/01 68557 04/12/01 68557 04/12/01 68558 04/12/01 68559 04/12/01 68560 04/12/01 68561 04/12/01 68562 04/12/01 68562 04/12/01 68563 04/12/01 68564 04/12/01 68565 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68566 04/12/01 68567 04/12/01 CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG OF FSD VOTING MBSHP:M. NORRIS 004488 002140 0040~9 JENKENS & GILDHRIBT JURKOSKY, MIKE 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC 000206 KINKOS INC 000206 KINKOS INC KROPPo PATRICIA 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 001534 003286 004087 004087 004493 J S A PUBLISHING CONSUL CITY STREET MAP AD FOR MUSEUM JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS EMAIL MONTHLY SUPPORT & MAINT FEB 2001 LEGAL SVCS: HR REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCCER BIOLOGICAL SVD:PALA RD PN97-15 REPAIR BLOWER PANELS:TCC REPLACE HOT IGNITOR:SA CTR OLD TWN WESTERN DAYS FLYERS STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS HP PRINTER SUPPLIES HP PRINTER SUPPLIES HP PRINTER SUPPLIES LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV A[RFARE:SIERRA CF:WESTON:4/30 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAR SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT LIPOT~ TERESA LONG, TIM LOWE~S LOWE'S M & N MONTGOMERY INC REFUND: SKYHAWKS-SOCLER REFUND:GRADING DPST LD99-222GR MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:FIRE HARDWARE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL REIM8: FACADE IMPROVEMENT PGRM 004428 MAIN STREET HOME IMPROV RES IMPRV:GARAGE DOOR GARCIA 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS CITY SIGNAGE FOR PW 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX INC 004141 MAINTEX IHt CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: MUSEUM CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES: CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: MAINT. FAC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: TCC OUSTOUIAL SUPPLIES: VAR. PARKS CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES: SR CENTER 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV:PAINTING FOR MESSER ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5226 190-185-999-5254 320-199-999-5211 001-130-999-5247 190-183-4982 210-165-631-5801 190-184-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 280-199-999-5362 330-199-999-5220 190-183-4982 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 001-140-999-5261 001-101-999-5285 190-183-4982 001-2670 001-171-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 001-164-601-5244 190-185-99~-5212 340-199-701-5212 340-199-702-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 165-199-813-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 60.00 195.00 300.00 48.00 25.00 592.50 60.00 300.00 438.60 50.26 25,00 241.63 190.00 451.50 174.00 1,144.57 25.00 995.00 11.05 144.05 10~082.50 920.00 508.48 125.69 170.97 125.69 125.69 160.82 148.33 125.69 1,900.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 60.00 195.00 300.00 48.00 25.00 592.50 360.00 488.86 25.00 883.13 174.00 1,144~57 25,00 995.00 155.10 10,082.50 920.00 508.48 982.88 1,900.00 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 68568 04/12/01 68569 04/12/01 68570 04/12/01 68571 04/12/01 68572 04/12/01 68573 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68574 04/12/01 68575 04/12/01 68575 04/12/01 68576 04/12/01 6857? 04/12/01 68578 04/12/01 68579 04/12/01 68580 04/12/01 68580 04/12/01 68581 04/12/01 68582 04/12/01 68583 04/12/01 68583 04/12/01 68584 04/12/01 68584 04/12/01 68584 04/12/01 68584 04/12/01 68585 04/12/01 68586 04/12/01 68586 04/12/01 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS 002011 MARTIN, KATHARINA E. MASCARIBA-VO, JUDITH 002693 MATROS, ANDREA 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY MCCRANNw C 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 NET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 004128 MORAMARCOw ANTHONY J. MORAMARCOo TONY 000437 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUB 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT 004401 NU VISION PRODUCTIONS 004401 NU VISION PRODUCTIONS 004401 NU VISION PRODUCTIONS 004401 NU VISION PRODUCTIONS 002100 OBJECT RADIANCE INC 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION UMPIRE SERVICES: SOFTBALL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:TINY TOTS PGRM 0002-103 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARRINGS TRAFFIC SIGNS & STUDYS REFUND:TINY TOTS PGRM 0003.102 003076 DENTALML 0030?6 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML 003076 DENTALML BUSINESS CARDS FOR POLICE SALES TAX STREET REPAIRS:GRADE OIAZ RO TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:BB MENS LEAGUE 4418-101 SPECIAL AUDIT-SLTPP FUNDS VALVE CARTRIDGE: VAR PARKS FREIGHT AUTO PARTS & MISC SUPPLIES BOW TO KILL A TREE BULLETINS HR RECRUITMENT ADS:Ab #182130 DISPLAY ADS: PW CONST. UPDATES EVERY 15 MINUTE PRGM VIOEO ADDTL CAMERA ~ORK:EVERY 15 ADDTL VHS COPIES:EVERY 15 HIM SALES TAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: MAIN STN M1SC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PD MAIN ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-187-999-5250 190-183-999-5330 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 001-164-602-5242 190-183-4982 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 193-2340 194-2340 280-2340 330-2340 340-2340 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-164-601-5402 190-18~-999-5330 190-183-4994 210-165-681-5801 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5215 001-164-604-5228 001-150-999-5254 001-165-999-5256 001-170-999-5371 001-170-999-5371 001-170-999-5371 001-170-999-5371 190-183-999-5330 001-170-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 2,156.00 489.60 65. O0 249.60 193.50 30.00 3,950.43 200.93 687.56 61.12 5.44 100.45 18.15 130.60 573.75 43.03 1,260. O0 552.00 40.00 3,500.00 432.00 10.00 5.13 100.00 60.00 533.80 913.75 300.00 215.00 22.50 691.20 17.20 26.74 PAGE 10 CHECK AMOUNT 2,156.00 489.60 65.00 249.60 193.50 30.00 5,154.68 616.78 1,260.00 552.00 40.00 3,500.00 442.00 5.13 100.00 593.80 1,451.25 691.20 43.94 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEH AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT VEHICLE:99-049 001-162-999-5214 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE SALES TAX 001-162-999-5214 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEH REPAIR/MAINT:PN01-067 001-164-601-5214 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIR: 95-026 190-180-999-5214 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT. VEHICLE:V-8051 001-162-999-5214 68587 04/12/01 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT. VEHICLE:V-1658 001-110-999-5214 17.95 1.24 66.45 29.15 20.00 65.05 199.84 68588 04/12/01 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY MEDICAL SUPPLIES: MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5311 90.93 90.93 68589 04/12/01 PACIFIC BELL REFUND: CELL SITE PA95-0033 001-2650 68590 04/12/01 002297 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS RELOCATION:TRADE POST dAN/FEB 210-190-165-5804 68591 04/12/01 PAGEL, TERESA REFUND:SKYHA~K SOCCER 4062-102 190-183-4982 1,500.00 2,515.00 25.00 1,500.00 2,515.00 25.00 68592 04/12/01 PARRICK, LORA REFUND:BALLROOM DANCE 2036-103 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 68593 04/12/01 PAVA, KENDRA REFUND:SELF DEFENSE 2040-105 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM CASH RECEIPT FORMS FOR BUS LIC 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS 001-140-9~9-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT EORM SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM BUSINESS LICENSE CERTIFICATES 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 68594 04/12/01 004463 PERFECT FORM SALES TAX 001-140-~-5222 68595 04/12/01 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 845.03 15.88 65.49 1,081.74 15.88 83.83 498.22 3.97 38.61 154.60 2,648.65 154.60 68596 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH TCSD SPRING EGG HUNT EVENT 190-183-999-5370 225.00 225.00 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5261 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 280-199-999-5260 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5220 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-111-999-5270 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5260 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5243 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5229 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5230 6~597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5371 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5265 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5212 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-2175 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-2175 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEI2NT 001-101-999-5280 20.00 20.00 12.74 37.50 9.34 32.90 32.64 4.26 20.26 14.00 15.54 12.25 3.00 30.76 31.11 37.56 43.87 50.00 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VEHDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68597 04/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 68598 04/12/01 68599 04/12/01 68600 04/12/01 000254 68600 04/12/01 000254 68600 04/12/01 000254 68601 04/12/01 68602 04/12/01 68603 04/12/01 68605 04/12/01 68604 04/12/01 68604 04/12/01 68605 04/12/01 68605 04/12/01 68606 04/12/01 68606 04/12/01 68606 04/12/01 PICARD, CATHERINE PLANT EQUIPMENT PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS EHTERPRISE COMPAH ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT REFUND:DPJ~WING CLASS 0204-104 REFUHD:BB MENS LEAGUE 4418-101 MAR VARIOUS LEaL NOTICES MAR VARIOUS PUBLIC NOTICES MAR VARIOUS PUBLIC NOTICES PROFANCIK, EDWARD 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE 000635 R & d PARTY PALACE 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 002612 RADIO SHACK INC 002612 RADIO SHACK INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL: CRC REFUND:SKYHAWK SOCCER 4062.104 RENTAL OF EQUIP:BLUEGRASS FEST EQUIP RENTAL:WELCOMING LUNCH DESIGN:NORTHWEST SPORTS COHPLX DESIGN:NORTHWEST SPORTS COHPLX MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS:LOW/FLOW P~99-15 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS:RANCHO CAL/YNEZ 000947 RANCHO 8ELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRIHTS:RCSP PWOO'~3CSW 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 P, ANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO ~07 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO 68607 04/12/01 000262 68607 04/12/01 000262 CALIF WATER DIST APR 01-08-00035-0 30765 HWY 79 CALIF WATER DIST APR 01-06-26305-0 28379 FRONT CALIF WATER DIST APR 01-06-30205-0 41952 6TH ST CALIF WATER DIST CALIF WATER DIST CALIF WATER DIST CALIF WATER DIST CALIF WATER DIST CALIF WATER DIST APR 01-06-30206-0 41952 6TH ST APR 01-06-55015-0 28667 FRONT APR 01-06-60005-0 41991 MAIN APR 01-06-81000-1 28699 FRONT APR 01-06-84~0-5 28747 PUJOL APR 01-02-98000-0 FIRE STN 8/* CALIF WATER DIST APR 01-02-98010-0 FIRE STN 84 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST VARIOUS WATER METERS A~COUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5320 001-2175 001-111-999-5270 001-111-999-5260 340-199-701-5250 340-199-701-5250 001-111-999-5270 001-2175 001-2175 001-2175 001-2175 001-2175 001-2175 190-183-4982 190-183-4994 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 190-182-999-5238 190 - 183 - 4982 280-199-999-5362 001-111-999-5270 210-190-17'3-5802 210-190-173-5802 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 210-165-707-5804 210-165-611-5802 210-190-178-5804 001-165-~99-5250 001-164-603-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-164-603-5240 001-164-603-5240 210-165-828-5804 280-199-807-5801 001-171-999-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 26.76 28.02 39.52 12.00 6.22 15.00 41.87 20.00 20.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 20,00 36.00 40.00 210.23 18.50 75.75 195.68 25.00 866.00 589.00 1,857.00 924.48 24.68 21.98 19.30 34.54 9.65 75.25 44.61 76.50 34.85 29.63 10.27 40.51 42.73 9.62 85.14 2,627.85 89.6~ CHECK AMOUNT 7~7.12 36.00 40.00 304.48 195.68 25.00 1,455.00 2,781.48 46.66 63.49 VOUCHRE2 04/12/01 12:49 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 13 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AJ4OUNT CHECK AMOUNT 68607 04/12/01 000262 PJ~NCHO CALIF WATER DIST 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO CAL1F WATER DIST 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCRO CALIF WATER DIST 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 68607 04/12/01 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 1~4NCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 68608 04/12/01 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VARIOUS WATER RETERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER NETERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & FUEL 190-182-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 193-180-9~9-5240 340-1¢9-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 001-162-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-110-~9-5214 001-110-~-5263 001-163-~-5214 001-164-601-5214 190-180-999-3214 190-180-999-5263 480.01 114.35 1,254.03 314.86 56.11 28.00 19.25 21.00 108.27 14.00 21.00 42.00 60.48 5,385.96 314.00 68609 04/12/01 REDFIELD, SEAM REFUND:BB MENS LEAGUE 4418-101 190-183-4994 40,00 40.00 68610 04/12/01 003742 REHA8 FINANCIAL CORPORA 68610 04/12/01 003742 REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORA 68610 04/12/01 003742 RENAB FINANCIAL CORPORA SERVICING AGENCY FOR CITIES SERVICING AGENCY FOR CITIES SERVICING AGENCY FOR CITIES 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 150.00 150.00 600.00 900.00 68611 04/12/01 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE 68612 04/12/01 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 68612 04/12/01 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR 68613 04/12/01 ROSENBAUM, RICHARD WEEDABATE VARIOUS LOTS FEB PARKING CITATION ASSESMENT FEB PARKING CITATION ASSESMENT REFUND:SKYHAWK SOCCER 4062-103 001-164-601-5402 001-2260 001-2265 190-183-4982 2,475.00 1,690.00 440.00 25.00 2,475.00 2,130.00 25.00 68614 04/12/01 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS REIMB:CPRS CONF:3/14-3/18/01 190-180-999-5258 152.85 152.85 68615 04/12/01 0002?7 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC MISC SUPPLIES:TINY TOT PGRM 190-183-999-5320 250.27 250.27 68616 04/12/01 003277 S T A ENGINEERING INC DESIGN:SIGNING/STRIPE PWO0-31 210-165-720-5802 68617 04/12/01 002285 SCANTRON CORPORATION PURCHASE SCANTRON FORMS FOR 001-163-999-5222 68617 04/12/01 002285 SCANTRON CORPORATION FREIGHT 001-163-999-5222 68617 04/12/01 002285 SCANTRON CORPORATION SALES TAX 001~163-999-5222 1,540.00 628.35 13.94 47,12 1,540.00 689.41 68618 04/12/01 000793 SCANTRON FPC CORPORATZO SCANTRON MAINT AGMNT/SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5215 899.00 899.00 68619 04/12/01 SICRCH, MARIA REFUND:SKYHAWK SOCCER 4062-104 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00' 68620 04/12/01 000751 SKILLPATH INC CONFLICT MGMT SKILLS:5/24 KC 001-171-999-5261 68620 04/12/01 000751 SKILLPATH [NC CONFLICT MGMT SKILLS:6/18 WIMS 001-161-999-5261 68621 04/12/01 0006~5 SMART & FINAL INC MISC SUPPLIES:EVERY 15 NIH PGR 001-170-999-5371 68621 04/12/01 000645 SMART & FINAL Igc MISC SUPPLIES: VOLUNTEER RECOG 190-183-999-5370 68622 04/12/01 003002 SMODTHILL SPORTS DISTRI MISC EQUIPMENT: SKATF PARK 190-183-999-5305 68622 04/12/01 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI FREIGHT 190-183-999-5305 99.00 ~.00 504.11 86.85 1,700.38 27.77 198.00 590.96 1,728.15 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 14 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMSER NAHE ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION HUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68623 04/12/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 68624 04/12/01 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR APR 2-10-331-1353 FIRE STN 84 001-171-999-5240 APR 2-10-331-2153 TCC 190-184-999-5240 APR 2-19-538-2262 FRONT/MONROE 190-180-999-5240 APR 2-20-798-3248 KIDS MUSEUM 190-180-999-5240 APR 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PED 001-16~-603-5319 MAR 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST PED 001-164-603-5319 APR 2-02-351-5281 CRC 190-182-999-5240 APR 2-02-502-807? MAINT. FAC. 340-199-702-5240 PEST CONTROLS SERVICES: TCC 190-184-999-5250 PEST CONTROL SERVICEf:STN 8~ 001-171-999-5212 PEST CONTROL SERVS: MAINT. FAC 340-199-702-5250 PEST CONTROL: POLICE CABOOSE 001-170-999-5250 PEST CONTROL:WEDOING CHAPEL 190-185-999-5250 PEST CONTROL:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5250 666.21 581.43 7~.67 203.95 351.24 331.06 3,621.11 809.29 36.00 80.00 40.00 29.00 32.00 42.00 6,637.96 259.00 68625 04/12/01 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 68625 04/12/01 000465 $TRAOLEY~ MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 432.00 288.00 720.00 68626 04/12/01 SYKES, LINDA REFUND:SKYHAWK SOCCER 4062-102 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE. 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE 68627 04/12/01 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR: P~ & ENG MISC SUPPLIES:PUB UORKS/ENG MISC SUPPLIES:PUB WORKS/ENG MISC SUPPLIES:PUB ~ORKS/ENG MISC SUPPLIES:RECREATION MISC SUPPLIES FOR:P W & ENG MISC SUPPLIES FOR:P ~ & ENG MISC SUPPLIES FOR:P ~ & ENG MISC SUPPLIES:FAMILY FUN NIGHT 190-183-999-5371 001-163-999-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 190-183-999-5320 001-163-999-5220 001-165-~-5220 001-164.-604-5220 190-183-999-5371 23.61 16.96 5.65 28.28 103.52 33.93 11.31 56.54 70.91 350.71 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 585.00 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 96.75 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 22.50 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 22.50 68628 04/12/01 001547 TEAHSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 51.75 68629 04/12/01 003130 TECATE GRILL RESTAURANT 68629 04/12/01 003130 TECATE GRILL RESTAURANT 68630 04/12/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 0006/,2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 0006/+2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY. FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 0006~2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 68630 04/12/01 0006~2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE FOOD FOR EMP LUNCHEON: 4/5/01 SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 1,154.30 86.57 4,7~3.18 225.00 934. O0 1.25 9.75 ~.00 3.75 466.66 11.25 787.50 1,240.87 6,4~9.84 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 15 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 68631 68632 68632 68633 68634 68635 68636 68636 68637 68637 68637 68637 68638 68638 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & 0042?4 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT 003140 TEMEEULA VALLEY TAEK~/ON 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 003862 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 000668 TIMMY D PROOUCTIONS 000~8 TIMMY D PROOUCTIONS 000~ TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS 000668 TIMMY D PROOUCTIONS 000320 TOMNE CENTER STATIONERS 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NL~4BER AMOUNT AMOUNT SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 243.33 POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR&~AINT 001-170-999-5214 POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT 001-170-999-5214 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 LOCKSMITH SERVICES:BUTTERFIELD 190-180-999-5212 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183~999-5330 ELEVATOR REPAIR:CITY HALL/MUSE 340-199-701-5250 ELEVATOR REPAIR:CITY HALL/MUSE 190-185-999-5250 MUSCIAN:CONCIERGE MEETING 001-111-999-5270 PA SYSTEM:SPRING EGG HUNT/PALO 190-183-999-5370 PA SYSTEM: SPRING EGG BUNT 190-183-999-5370 P A SYSTEM:SPRING EGG HUNT/TEM 190-183-999-5370 MISE OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5242 001-164-604-5220 93.79 341.50 1.87 100.00 135.00 135.00 ;5.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 537.77 69.17 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 001-2360 148.88 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 30.76 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AO&D 192-2360 .08 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 193-2360 2.93 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 194-2360 .59 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.49 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 300-2360 .74 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&O 330-2360 2.25 68639 04/12/01 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AO&D 340-2360 4.27 68640 68640 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 000978 TRAUFLR INTERVENTION PRG 0009?8 TP~UMA INTERVENTION PRG 2ND QTR EMERG.RESPONSE VOL. PR 001-171-999-5274 3RD QTR EMER.RESPONSE VOL. PGM 001-171-999-5274 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 SEMINAR REGISTRATION: HOGAN 001-161-999-5261 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 U C L A EXTENSION 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMp) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF CC~4P 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COI4p) 001065 DEF COMp 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 68642 68643 68643 68663 68643 68643 68643 68643 1,620.00 1,620.00 176.00 153.60 192.00 176.00 410.00 10,746.82 101.16 2,094.22 7.50 168.70 44.50 117.36 243.33 435.29 1.87 68.76 100.00 270.00 3;5.00 606.94 201.00 3,240.00 697.60 410.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 68643 04/12/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COHP) 001065 DEF COMP 68643 04/12/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEE COMP) 001065 DEE COHP 68643 04/12/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEE COHP) 001065 DEE COHP 68644 04/12/01 ,000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000589 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C H WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 68644 04/12/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE HETER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERV[CE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 O S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 68645 04/12/01 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE HETER DEPOSIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 300-2080 320-2080 540-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 001-100-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-111-999-5230 190-185-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT ~.55 1,416.68 169.46 610.94 81.64 999.75 21.05 23.24 67.26 48.72 37.02 9.26 120.99 160.30 183.58 494.82 56.38 789.06 89.86 854.46 577.67 6.35 6.46 212.05 708.22 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 127.05 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 8.75 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 22.60 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .10 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 2.20 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .50 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 2.50 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 5.00 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 5.00 68646 04/12/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 68647 04/12/01 004440 UNIVERSITY PRODUCTS INC MUSEUM SUPPLIES 686/*8 04/12/01 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE PLAN CHECK SVCS: DEC O0 6~8 04/12/01 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE PLAN CHECK SVCS: JAN 2001 190-185-999-5250 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-5248 68649 04/12/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAR XXX-1289 PRATT 320-199-999-5208 68649 04/12/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAR XXX-2629 HAGGAR 320-199-999-5208 68649 04/12/01 004261 VERIZOR CALIFORNIA MAR XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALER 520-199-999-5208 ~49 04/12/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAR XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 68649 04/12/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA MAR XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 40.35 3,282.52 3,046.72 66.03 47.48 28.37 38.46 130.41 PAGE 16 CHECK AMOUNT 14,954.95 1,889.62 4,269.46 174.30 40.35 6,329.24 310.75 ~50 04/12/01 00427'9 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. APR ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE 320-199-999-5208 341.38 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 17 04/12/01 12:49 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 68650 68651 68652 68653 68654 68655 68655 68655 68655 68655 68655 68655 68655 68655 CHECK DATE 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/1Z/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 04/12/01 VENDOR NUMBER 004279 004480 VENDOR NAME VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. WALDEN DANL WEDDLE~ DONALD WINCHESTER PROPERTIES NO00S, DEENA 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ 000345 XEROX CORPORATION B[LLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL! 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ITEM DESCRIPTION APR ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE SOUND SYSTEM: BLUEGRASS FEST REFUND:BB MENS LEAGUE 4418-101 REFUND: LDSP BOND PA96-0018 REFUND:SKYHAWX SOCCER 4062-104 LEASE FOR COPIERS:460 & 240 INTEREST FOR COP[ERS:MAINT FAC LEASE OF COP[ER: DC420 MAINT POOLED MAINT.FOR CITY COP[ERS LEASE OF COPIER: 420 AT TCC LEASE FOR COP[ER: 420 STN 8/, SALES TAX LEASE OF COPIER: 5800 COPY CTR MA[NT & SUPPLIES FOR 5800 ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5208 280-199-999-5362 190-183-4994 001-2650 190-183-4982 330-2800 330-199~999-5391 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 190-184-999-5239 001-171-999-5239 001-171-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999~5391 ITEM AMOUNT 341.38 2,000.00 40.00 1,928.00 50.00 1,632.76 1,095.48 223.62 5,440.92 224.62 208.02 15.60 1,776.50 604.97 CHECK AMOUNT 682.76 2,000.00 40.00 1,928.00 50.00 11,222.49 TOTAL CHECKS 340,558.32 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/12/01 16:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADM[N EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 77,048.85 34,600.00 61,619.22 24,228.00 12,782.29 37.00 503.25 3,885.33 5,794.00 TOTAL 220,497.94 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECUi& PAGE 1 04/12/01 16:26 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR HUMBER DATE NUMBER 68658 04/24/01 68659 04/24/01 68659 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68660 04/24/01 68661 04/24/01 68661 04/24/01 68662 04/24/01 68665 04/24/01 68664 04/24/01 VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS 002174 GROUP 1 PROUUCTIONS 004115 K T U & ASSOCIATES 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS 68665 04/24/01 000230 68665 04/24/01 000230 68666 04/24/01 68666 04/24/01 68667 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 68668 04/24/01 MUNIFINANCIAL MUNIFINANCIAL 00100? N P G CORPORATION 001007 N P G CORPORATION 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHAROS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH 68669 04/24/01 004142 68669 04/24/01 004142 68669 04/24/01 004142 68669 04/24/01 004142 68669 04/24/01 004142 VISIONS WEST VISIONS WEST VISIONS WEST VISIONS WEST VISIONS WEST COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT 190-180-999-5286 INSTALL RIBBON GUTTER:PARKS REPAIR SHOULDER @ NADA LANE 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5402 MAR LDSCP SVCS:HEIGHORHOOD PRK MAR LDSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARK MAR LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS MAR LDSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPES MAR LDSCP SVCS:NORTH SLOPES MAR LDSCP SVCS:CRC MAR LDSCP SVCS:SR DTR MAR LDSCP SVCS:MNTC FAC MAR LDSCP SVCS: TCC MAR LDSCP SVCS:STN B4 MAR LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN PRKLOT MAR DSCP SVCS:STREETSCAPE MAR LDSCP SVCS:MUSEUN 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-185-999-5415 MAR LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORHO00 PK 190-180-999-5415 MAR LDSCP SVCS:MUSEUM 190-180-999-5415 MAR LDSCP SVCS:NAOA LANE FLD D 190-180-999-5415 STATE OF THE CITY:2000 VIDEO 001-110-999-5248 STATE OF THE CITY:2000 VIDEO 001-110-999-5250 FEB SVCS:TEM MULTI-USE TRAILS 210-190-176-5802 MAR SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 PAINT & SUPPLIES:STENCIL TRUCK 001-164-601-5218 ASSESSMENT SRVS:APR-JUN 2001 190-180-999-5370 REIMBURSABLES FOR ASSESSMENT 190-180-999-5370 RE-STRIPE CITY HALL PRK LOT 340-199-701-5212 RE-STRIPE W.PRK LOT CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 DESIGN:CHAPARRAL POOL-JAN/FEB 210-190-170-5802 MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES MAR 2001 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 190-180-999-5246 300-199-999-5246 280-199-999-5246 261-199-999-5246 210-165-631-5801 ASBESTOS REMOVAL:PUJOL BT ASBESTOS REMOVAL:6TH ST ASBESTOS REMOVAL:6TH ST ASBESTOS REMOVAL: PUJOL ST ASBESTOS REMOVAL: PUJOL ST 165-199-823-5700 165-199-823-5700 165-199-823-5700 165-199-823-5700 165-199-823-5700 ITEM AMOUNT 10,002.00 5,820.00 14,615.00 11,635.00 25,325.00 1,9~5.00 13,3~5.00 8,878.00 1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 1,000.00 155.00 165.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 7,505.00 11,170.04 6,534.93 5,000.00 108.22 3,717.00 1,536.00 5,242.29 37,591.88 126.00 3,885.33 503.25 37.00 35.00 7,800.00 4,600.00 7,600.00 7,700.00 6,900.00 CHECK AMOUNT 10,002.00 20,435.00 66,969.00 5,500.00 7,505.00 11,170.04 6,534.93 5,108.22 5,253.00 5,242.29 42,178.46 34,600.00 TOTAL CHECKS 220,497.94 ITEM 4 APPROVAL['"~/, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCe' CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Herman Parker, Director of Community Services April 24, 2001 Request for Legislative Nominations for Grant Funding for the Children's Museum and the CommunityTheater PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 and a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 DISCUSSION: The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (2000 Park Bond Act) was passed by the state constituents in March 2000. The Act provides for several competitive and non-competitive grant funding sources under several different categories. One competitive category of funding is for the Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers (Urban Centers). Unlike the other funding opportunities under the 2000 Park Bond Act, this particular grant requires the nomination of the project by a state legislator: All legislative nominations must be R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\urban centers grant.doc submitted to the Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) by July 1, 2001. Nominated applicants must submit a complete application to the OGALS by November 1, 2001. OGALS will evaluate projects and prior to April 1, 2002, will submit to the Legislature a prioritized listing and comparative evaluation of all projects nominated. Funds will then be dispersed after they are appropriated in the state budget and the appropriate contracts ha~e been executed. At total of $7,675,000 is available for the Urban Centers grants. These funds may be used for the development or rehabilitation of real property only. They may not be used for land acquisition. The competitive criteria for this funding includes: The project will interpret one or more important Calibrnia historical, cultural, economic, or resource themes or an important historical, cultural, economic, technological, or resource them in a major region or California. Higher priority shall be assigned to projects whose themes are not interpreted in any existing museum or have demonstrable deficiencies in their presentation in an e~isting museum. · The project is proposed to be operated on lands that are already in public ownership or on lands that will be acquired and used for the project in conjunction with adjoining public lands. Projects that are closely related geographical to the resources, activity, structure, place, or collection of objects to be interpreted, and are close to population centers and access routes. · Projects that are in, or close to, population centers or are adjacent to, or readily served by a state highway or other mode of public transportation. · Projects for which there are commitments, or the sedous likelihood of commitments, of funds or the donation of land or other propertysuitable for the project. The two projects staff is recommending for consideration are the Children's Museum and the Community Theater. The City has successfully acquired sites for both of these projects and has begun the design phase for their construction. The City has committed substantial funding for both projects and the projects are supported by the community. Kid's Voice, currently in the process of obtaining their non-profit status, has committed to raising funds for the Children's Museum. The Theater Foundation has committed to raising at least $1,000,000 for the community theater and has already raised $500,000 toward that endeavor. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of this item, staff will prepare letters to our state legislators requesting that they nominate the Children's Museum in the amount of $300,000 and the Community Theater in the amount of $300,000 for consideration of Urban Centers grant funding. R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS\urban centers grant,doc RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecuia does find, determine and a. The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (2000 Park Bond Act) provides funding for Urban Recreational and Cultural grants. Successful projects must be submitted to the California State Office of Grants Services through the nomination of the City's state legislator by July 1, 2001. b. The City of Temecula has completed a feasibility study, which has concluded that the residents of the City would greatly benefit from a cultural center known as a Children's Museum that would focus on youth education and recreation in a hands-on environment that encourages imagination, e~loration and discovery. c. The facility will be designed to meet the science and technology interests of the children in the community. It will be inviting for children and encourage family interaction in a f~n and safe environment. d. There is not a similar type of facility or cultural center, either publicly or privately owned and operated, within the City. e. The City of Temecula has previous acquired and now owns, free and clear, a 7,500 square foot building in the City's Old Town area that will be renovated to house the Children's Museum. f. The building for the proposed Children's Museum is within less than one mile from the Rancho California Road on and off ramps of Interstate 15, and as such, is readily served by a state highway. g. The City of Temecula has a current population of 57,000 persons. On July 1,2001, the City will complete the annexation of a populated area that will increase the City's population by an additional 5,000 persons. The City of Temecula is the fastest growing City in Riverside County, and at build out it is estimated that the City's population will be between 95,000 and 100,000 persons. h. The City of Temecula has approved this project in its five year Capital Improvement Program and allocated $1,500,000 of City funds to the propertyacquisition, design, construction and exhibit fabrication and installation for this project. i. Kid's Voice, a volunteer organization within the City, is in the process of obtaining their non-profit status. Kid's Voice will play an instrumental role in the design and operations of the facility. j. Kid's Voice has committed to organize and lead a fund raising drive for the Children's Museum, which will include private donations and corporate sponsorships. The City of Temecula is in the 36th Senatorial District and in the 66th Assembly District. Section 2. That the City of Temecula authorizes staff to request a legislative nomination for grant funding for the Children's Museum under the Urban Recreational and Cultural grant program as part of the 2000 Park Bond Act. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. Temecula this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of day of ,2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CiTY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of ,2001 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE NOMINATION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT BY OUR STATE LEGISLATOR FOR AN URBAN RECREATION AND CULTURAL CENTERS GRANT THROUGH THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: · Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and a. The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (2000 Park Bond Act) provides funding for Urban Recreational and Cultural grants. Successful projects m.ust be submitted to the California State Office of Grants Services through the nomination of the City's state legislator by July 1, 2001. b. The City of Temecula has completed a Cultural Arts Master Plan, which has concluded that the residents of the City would greatly benefit from a community theater. c. There are approximately 24 amateur performance groups in the City. None of these groups have a permanent theater or venue for rehearsals and performances. d. The City has designed an 18,000 square foot theater with a 316 seating capacity that will be available to all performing groups in the community. e. There is not a similar type of facility or cultural center, either publicly or privately owned and operated, within the City. f. The City of Temecula has previous acquired and now owns, free and clear, an historical building known as the Mercantile Building in the City's Old Town area that will be renovated to house the communitytheater. g. The building for the proposed community theater is within less than one mile from the Rancho California Road on and off ramps of Interstate 15, and as such, is readily served by state highway. h. The City of Temecula has a currant population of 57,000 persons. On July 1, 2001, the City will complete the annexation of a populated area that will increase the City's population by an additional 5,000 person. The City of Temecula is the fastest growing City in Riverside County, and at build out it is estimated that the City's population will be between 95,000 and 100,000 persons. R:\RUSEP\RESOS\urban centers * playhouse.d~ i. The City of Temecula has approved this project in its five year Capital Improvement Program and allocated $1,114,270 of City funds to the property acquisition, design and construction of this project. An additional $385,730 has been identiied as unspecified funds needed to complete this project. j. The Theater Foundation, a non-profit organization, has committed to raising an additional $1,000,000 for the completion of the communitytheater. To date, the Theater Foundation has raised $500,000 for the project The City of Temecula is in the 36th Senatorial District and in the 66t~ Assembly District. Section 2. That the City of Temecula authorizes staff to request a legislative nomination for grant funding for the community theater under the Urban Recreational and Cultural grant program as pad ofthe 2000 Park Bond Act. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. Temecula this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of __dayof ,2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor City Clerk [SEAL] Susan W. Jones, CMC STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,2001 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:\RUSEP\RESOS\urban centers - playhouse.doc ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC'~ CITYMANAGER ~,/~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Offici~al///~ April 24, 2001 Approval of Funds for Plan Review Services with Van Dorpe Chou and Associates RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve: An expenditure in an amount not to exceed thirty five thousand ($35,000) dollars for Plan Check Services with Van Dorpe Chou and Associates. DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department has experienced a large volume of plan review activity over the past several months. To be responsive to this increased plan review workload, the services of VanDorpe Chou and Associates has been utilized, with whom Building and Safety currently maintains a Professional Service Agreement. In July, 2000, the City Council approved an expenditure of $75,000 for Plan Check Services with Van Dorpe Chou and Associates. Over the past several months plan review activity has increased. As a result, the need to utilize the plan check services of Van Dorpe Chou and Associates will exceed staffs previous estimates. This additional expenditure approval will provide adequate funding for the balance of the fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-162-999-52478, "Consulting Services". The cost is supported by plan review fee revenue collected. R: IBROCKMEI\AGENDA\VANDORPE 35K. DOC ] 4/12/01 ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~AL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOROF FINAN(7~ ~ II CITY MANAGER ~ /~.~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Pavement Management System - Citywide, FY2000-2001, Project No. PW00-30 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Pavement Management System - Citywide, FY2000-2001, Project No. PW00-30. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the Annual Pavement Management System Program. The Program includes the rehabilitation of pavement by reconstructing roads within the City with the associated pavement striping and legends. This pavement management system for FY2000-2001 is included in the Capital Improvement Program budget. The roads included in this project are as follows: Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, Winchester Road, Overland Drive, Nicholas Road, Enterprise Circle West and South, Mira Loma Drive, Main Street, County Center Drive, and La Paz Street. The specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contact document is available for review in the City EngineeCs office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for this project is $2,000,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pavement Management System Program is a Capital Improvement Project funded through Measure A Funds and Capital Project Reserves. 1 r:\agdrpt~2001~0424\pw00-30.bid ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC_~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council /~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2000-2001, Project No. PW01-01 PREPARED BY: Brad A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent Amer Attar, Senior Engineer Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2000-2001, Project No. PW01-01. BACKGROUND: This Asphalt Repair Project for FY2000-2001 is part of the Annual Street Maintenance Program. The Program involves fixing podions of streets that require minor repairs and the associated pavement striping and legends. The roads included in this project are as follows: Rancho California Road, Winchester Road, Margarita Road, Jefferson Avenue, and Diaz Road. The specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract document is available for review in the City Engineer's office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for this project is $100,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department, Maintenance Division, Routine Street Maintenance Account No. 001-164-601-5402 for Project No. PW01-01. ATTACHMENTS: None 1 r:~agdrp¢,2001 \0424\pw01-01 .bid ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ I /~,~ William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 Reimbursement Agreement between R.C.W.D. and the City of Temecula for Margarita Road Widening from Plo Pico Road to Dartolo Project No. PW99-01 PREPARED BY: ,,~.Amer Attar, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects ~ ~ff Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Reimbursement Agreement between Rancho California Water District and the City of Temecula for the Margarita Road Widening from Pio Pico Road to Dartolo, Project No. PW99-O1. BACKGROUND: On March 6, 2001 the City Council awarded the Margarita Road Widening from Plo Pico Road to Dadolo, Project PW99-15 to R.J. Noble Company. The reimbursement agreement states that R.C.W.D. will reimburse the City for the following water relocation and installation bid items: Bid Item 24 Bid Item 129 Bid Item 130 Adjust Existing Valve Cover to Grade Water Facility Reconfiguration Relocate Existing Water Meters $ 3,600.00 $60,000.00 $18,200.00 Total: $81,800.00 FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with the Reimbursement Agreement will be paid for by R.C.W.D. at no fiscal impact to the City. ATTACHMENTS: Reimbursement Agreement with R.C.W.D. 1 R:~AGDRP'r~2001\0424\PW99-01 RCWD AGREEMENT.DOC REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA MARGARITA ROAD WIDENING FROM PIO PICO ROAD TO DARTOLO PROJECT NO. PW99-01 AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of April 24, 2001, between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Rancho California Water District, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to Division 20 of the California Water Code, hereinafter referred to as "RCWD". In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Section I. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish reimbursement to CITY by RCWD for the cost of the relocation and installation of certain water improvements made necessary by the construction of Margarita Road Widening from Pio Pico Road to Dartolo, Project No. PW99-01, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT". Section II. RCWD shall reimburse CITY for one hundred percent (100%) of the costs (hereinafter referred to as "REIMBURSEMENT"), for the relocation and installation of certain water improvements within the PROJECT area that are affected by the PROJECT. The costs for the REIMBURSEMENT to CITY by RCWD shall include the following items as shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet: A. Water Item Extended Bid Amounts Bid Item 24 Bid Item 129 Bid Item 130 Adjust Existing Valve Cover to Grade Water Facility Reconfiguration Relocate Existing Water Meters $ 3,600.00 $60,000.00 $18,200.00 $81,800.00Total Section III. Costs are based on construction bids received for the PROJECT shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet as bid items //24 (adjust existing valve cover to grade), //129 (water facility reconfiguration),//130 (relocate existing water meter). CITY has evaluated and analyzed all bids received and selected the lowest responsible bidder for the PROJECT as R.J. Noble Company (herinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"). RCWD has reviewed the bids and approved CITY's selection of CITY's CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT. RCWD shall maintain as a contingency an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total estimated costs of constructing the water facilities to account for unforeseen changes to the work. The CITY shall obtain approval from RCWD prior to the approval of any change orders associated with the relocation and installation of these facilities, and authorizing the contractor to proceed unless failure to act immediately may affect public safety. The cost of any delay in the work due to the delayed action of RCWD in approving change orders associated with the water facility construction shall be borne by RCWD. RCWD shall respond to water facility change orders within three business days. CITY shall make payment to CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to RCWD for payment on the following basis: A. The CITY shall invoice RCWD on a monthly basis for all RCWD facilit!es completed by r :~cip\project s\pw9 9\pw9 9 -01 ~RCWD reimburseagrmt 1 the CONTRACTOR. RCWD shall remit payment to the City within twenty-five days of receipt of invoice. Section IV. It is acknowledged that RCWD has reviewed and approved all CITY plans and specifications for the relocation and installation of the water facility improvements and has approved the bid amount as reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed herein shall be performed by CITY for the PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer, Capital Projects, as the contact for CITY in regards to this agreement. RCWD agrees to designate Mr. Steve Brannon, Development Engineering Manager, as a point of contact for RCWD to facilitate the reimbursements identified herein. Section V. INSPECTION RCWD shall provide and pay for inspection of all new and relocated facilities specifically, Bid Items #24, adjust existing valve to grade, #129, water facility reconfiguration, #130, relocate existing water meter. Section VI. NOTICES All notices under this Agreement shall be sent as follows: RCWD: Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Steve Brannon, Development Engineering Manager CITY: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attn: Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer, Capital Projects Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party. All notices given at the most recent address specified shall be deemed to have been properly given. r:\cip\projects[pw99\pw99-01 ~RCWD reimburseagrmt 2 This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above. District: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT By: City: CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk r :\cip\project s~pw99\pw99-01 \RCWD reimburseagrmt 3 Margariat Road Widening Phase I, Project PW99-01 Bid Open~ng: 2/28/2001 1 · ~. R,J. Noble Company Item Description Estimate Unit Unit Extended No, Quantity Price Amount I ~ obilizatio n/De mo blization 1 L.S. $25~000.00 $25,000,00 ::~29:1 WetetFacilityRec~nfigu~,atior~ : !! ii:11 E~S~i ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANO~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUL.~ AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council · '~,~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 24, 2001 SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for the Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-17, Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation PREPARED BY:~..................~kmer Attar, Senior Engineer ----'r~Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-17, Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation to R.J. Noble Companyfor $603,425.00, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $60,342.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2000, the City Council approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project will rehabilitate the pavement on Jefferson Avenue from the northerly city limits to 300 feet north of Overland Drive. The work to be performed will include cold planning existing pavement, removing & replacing pavement and base material, resurfacing with a layer of asphalt concrete, crack sealing, treating of all oil stains and replacing of all traffic loops, striping and street legends. The project specifications requires that the contractor perform his work in stages to minimize traffic impact. Also, the contractor will allow at least one access to all properties, except for some shod durations. Five (5) bids were received and publicly opened on April 11, 2001 and results were as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. R.J. Noble Company .................................................................................... $603,425.00 All American Asphalt .................................................................................... $618,296.25 McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc .......................................................... $644,725.75 Frank & Son Paving ....................................................................................... $693,948.75 Vance Corporation ......................................................................................... $727,222.00 The Engineer's estimate for this project is $750,000. Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found R.J. Noble Company of Orange, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. R.J. Noble Company is the construction contractor for the Margarita Road Widening from Plo Pico Road to Dartolo Road. Staff has contacted references and determined that R.J. Noble Company has satisfactorily performed similar type of work in the past. 1 r:\agdrpt\O 1\0424\pw99-17 awd/ The specifications allow forty five (45) working days for completion of this project, A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Jefferson Avenue Pavement Management Improvement Project is budgeted in the FY2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program budget and is funded by Capital Project Reserves and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds. Adequate funds are available in Account 210-165-656-5804. The total construction cost is $663,767.50, which includes the contract amount of $603,425.00 plus 10% contingency of $60,342.50. ATrACHMENT: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 r:~egdrpt\01\0424\pw99-17awd/ oo CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW99-17 PA VEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - JEFFERSON A VENUE PA VEMENT REHA BILITA TION THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 24th day of April, 2001, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and R.J. Noble Company, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: ,8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW99-17, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JEFFERSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Constructioq, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW99-17, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - JEFFERSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW99-17, PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JEFFERSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe podions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed CONTRACT CA-1 r:\ciplprojecLs\pw99-17tContract and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO, PW99-17 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JEFFERSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: SIX HUNDRED THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TVVENTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($603,425.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various podions of the work, prepared in such form and suppoded by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. CONTRACT CA-2 r.\cip\projects\pw99-17~Contract UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any pad of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% ofamountin excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1%of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACT CA-3 r:\ciplprojects\pw99-17\Contract 10. 11. 12. 13. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONTRACT CA4 r:\cip~projects\pw99-17~Contract 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except cedain items, if any, to be set fodh in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such pad thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects\pw99-17\Contract 22. 23. Fudhermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: William (3. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects~pw99-17\Contract iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR R.J. Noble Company 15505 E. Lincoln Ave. Orange, CA 92865 (714) 637-1550 By: Michael J. Carver, President DATED: CITY OFTEMECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 r:\cip\projects\pw99-17\Contract ITEM 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ,~J,~lWilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 Meandering Sidewalk along North General Kearny Road for "Christ The Vine Lutheran Church" project (LD00-210GR). Property is located south of North General Kearny Road approximately 325 feet east of the Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road centerline intersection. PREPARED BY: ~L{ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Mayra De La Torre, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept a meandering sidewalk easement along North General Kearny Road for public use only. BACKGROUND: Planning Application No. PA99-0124 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) included a request for a conditional use permit to design, construct, and operate a 15,288 square foot church, five classrooms and a garage on 3.07 acres within Planning Area 2 of the Campos Verdes Specific Plan. This development plan includes a meandering sidewalk through private property along North General Kearny Road. Per this project's Conditions of Approval #15, "All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works for dedication to the Citywhere sidewalks meander through private property." Said meandering sidewalk easement is for rights to access for public use. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Two Signed and Notarized Easement Deeds for Meandering Sidewalk Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Sketch I r:~agdrpt~2001\0424\Sdwlk Esmt LD00-210GR EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'T CODE 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula - City Clerk PO Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92589-9033 M~dL TAX STATEMENTS TO PO Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 EASEMENT DEED - MEANDERING SIDEWALK FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of wh, ich is hereby acknowledged, · CHRIST THE VINE LUTHERAN CHURCH A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT RELIGIOUS CORPORATION~ GRANTS to the City OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for meandering sidewalk, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as: See Attached Exhibit "A" and "B" For Complete Description thisIN WITNESS~...THEREOF, dayofthese presents Oaved,~-~//~-executed ,20 ~'9 t/this instrument ~.~ ~/~~5-,.Print Name~' and[ Tit leis/_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA }SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On.~,~).~ [ I 4 ~9/r'~) /, before me the undersigned, a N~t~t~/P~blic in and for thc St~tte of California, personally appeared personally knoWn'to me (or~oahe on'il~e'basis Of satisfactory evidence~)x to be the personJp'J whose name~ is/g,r,~subscribe~l/[~ instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she~/t~xecuted the same in his/hg, r/tlxok authorized capacity i~, and that by his/her/their signature(~ on the instrument the person(:~r the entity upon behalf of which the person~acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The City Council, Cityt~ Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOV'F CODE 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Temecula - City Clerk PO Box 9033, 43200 Business park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PO Box 9033, 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 EASEMENT DEED - MEANDERING SIDEWALK FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CHRIST THE VINE LU'rtlERAN CHURCH (WELS)~ A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT RELIGIOUS CORPORATION~ GRANTS to the City OF TEMECULA, a political subdivision, an easement for meandering sidewalk, including the construction and maintenance over, upon, across, and within real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as: See Attached Exhibit "A" and "B" For Complete Description IN WITNESS THEREOF, these presents have executed this instrument ..... ~.' . this ~' day of //f,'~,,~//-~ ,20 c'9 t/ r.~/''''' Pnnt Name and Title STA~ OF C~IFOR~A } SS. COU~ OF ~~} On ~' ~ [-- o/ , before me the undersigned, a Not~ Public in and for the State of California, person~ly appe~ed ~ (or proved to me on the basis of satishctoW evidence) to be the person ~ whose name~ is/~subscribed to the within ins~ment and acknowledged to me that he/~ exerted the same in his~zr/t~z~r authorized capaciW(~), and that by his~er~ir signature~) on the inst~ment the person(~ or the entiW upon behalf of which the person(~ acted, executed the inst~ment. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Signature ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE ~a~ rub~= -- ~ _ Comm. Nov 1] 3 The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA ATI'EST: BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney RBF CONSULTING 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400 Temecula, CA 92591 EXHIBIT "A" SIDEWALK EASEMENT February 20, 2001 JN 401381-M1 Page 1 of 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Parcel "D" of Lot Adjustment No. PA 98-0054 recorded April 9, 1998 as Instrument No. 137810 of Official Records in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel "D" being a point on a curve in the most northerly line of said Parcel "D"(said northerly line being also the southerly line of North General Kearny Road - 88.00 feet wide), said curve being concave northerly and having a radius of 1244.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 12036'22'' West; thence along said northerly line and curve westerly 87.78 feet through a central angle of 04°02'34" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly and having a radius of 156.00 feet, a radial tine of said curve from said point bears North 26°33'21'' West; thence along said curve westerly 81.21 feet through a central angle of 29°49'39" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave southerly and having a radius of 94.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 03°16'18'' West; thence along said curve westerly 24.91 f6et through central angle of 15010'55'' to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northerly and having a radius of 156.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 11054'37'' West; thence along said curve westerly 81.21 feet through central angle of 29o49'39'' to the non- tangent intersection with said first mentioned curve concave northerly and having a radius of 1244.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said intersection bears North 00°04'31'' West; Exhibit "A" Sidewalk Easement February 20, 2001 JN 401381-M1 Page 2 of 2 thence along said curve and northerly line easterly 184.29 feet through a central angle of 08°29'17'' to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.028 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. R~. )Mathe, P.L.S. 6185 My license expires 3/31/02. ~Exp.. '3i3'1 ,~02/ J/ H:\pdata\401381\OFFICE\WPWlI~81tg1001.wpd 60 0 60 120 180 GRAPHIC SCALE I _~--C/L NORTH GEN._.E_RAL KE/kRN¥ DATA TABLE 1 04°02'54" 1244.00' 87.78' 2 29°49'59" 156.00' 81.21' 3 15°10'55" 94.00' 24.91' 4 08°29'17" 1244.00' 184.29' SHEET EXHIBIT SIDEWALK EASEMENT O0 NSLILTIN 8 1 DF 1 SHEET 27555 YNEZ ROAD. SUrFE 400 TEMECULA, CAUFORN1A 92591-4679 909.676.8042 · FAX 909.676.7240., vcew~BF.com SCALE FIELD BOOK JOB ND, FEBRUARY 20, 2001 1"=60' 401581-M1 ITEM 11 APPROVAL ~'~1~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER ...Y~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Apdl 24, 2001 Consideration of Sponsorship Request for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) Consider the sponsorship request of $30,000 for the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has previously sponsored the Temecula Valley Intemational Film Festival in the amount of $30,000. The Film Festival has again requested that the City provide a sponsorship in this amount. This year the event will include a Music Festival in addition to the Film Festival, and will be held September 13 - 16, 2001. At the time that the City Council approved the City's FY2000/01 budget, funds were allocated for this sponsorship. Most of the sponsorship agreements were brought to the City Council last July, shortly after adoption of the budget. This sponsorship agreement was not brought at that time because it was determined that it would be more appropriate to bdng the sponsorship agreement and supporting documents closer in time to the planned events. Since this event will be held in September it is now appropriate to bdng this forward for Council consideration. Staff, as well as the Economic Development Subcommittee recommends approval of this sponsorship. Following is further information concerning the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. The 2001 Festival marks the 7th annual Film Festival presentation and the inaugural edition of the music competition component of the Festival. For the first time in the Festival's history and for four days in September, Temecula will host the marriage of two influential art forms - Film & Music, The best up and coming creative talents in film and music from all over the world will compete for recognition and pdzes. The event will take place at the Movie Experience 10-plex at Tower Plaza in Temecula. The Festival's subsequent events will be held at locations in the City of Temecula as well as Wine Country and Pechanga Entertainment Center. The event attracted approximately 4,000 in attendance in 2000 with the attendance expected to increase to 5,000 this year. The 2001 Temecula Valley Intemational Film & Music Festival will include the following venues: R:\Wolnickg~Agendarepo~ts~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc The Film Program Since its inception in 1995, the festival has screened over 400 films from 20+ countries. They are independent full-length features, shorts, documentaries, animation, music videos and student films. The 2001 line up of films will feature over 50 film programs from around the world. There will be two sidebars, which include a showcase of Australian Films and Amedcan Film Institute's Best of AFl Shorts Series. The Music Competition The Musicfest participants consist of emerging, up and coming unsigned performing artists and bands. Music genres include contemporary, traditional, rock, pop, folk and wodd music. The main goal for this competition is to provide a forum by which new, unsigned musical talents are showcased before an international audience of recording industry professionals. Workshops/Dialogue Series In addition to the usual slate of Casting, Film Finance and Film Distribution Workshops, the Festival will program the "Coffee with... Breakfast with...An Afternoon with... Dialogue Sedes" with film and music industry personalities and festival attendees. This additional programming will be targeted at film students and novice filmmakers. Special Events The 4-day event's social calendar is designed to encourage more community involvement and extended 4-day visits by festival attendees. The events include: Opening Night Premiere & Reception Friday Filmmaker's Bash Saturday Moming Wine Tasting & Old Town Tour Sunday Morning Hot Air Balloon Ride Black Tie Awards Gala Closing Night Premiere/Awards Ceremony & Wrap Party Ongoing Activities Throughout The Festival There will be film screenings in six theaters from 11:00 a.m. - 11:00 p.m. Music performances by bands and individual performers from 4:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. Film and Music industry related exhibits, gallery of fine, unique arts and crafts at the Festival Marketplace from 11:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Awards Two Lifetime Achievement awards will be given for both Film and Music. Jury and Audience awards for Film and Music Competition will also be given. In addition, College Scholarship awards for two high school seniors will be awarded. The Film Festival will be organized and presented by Cinema Entertainment Alliance in cooperation with Temecula Valley Film Council. Jo Moulton and Eve Craig, Founder and Co- founder of the Temecula Valley Film Council and Film Festival will serve as this year's Festival Director and Festival Advisor. Mr. Steve Montal, American Film Institute's Director of Education & Program Development, will help with film acquisition and programming as the Festival's Film Program Director. Mr. Kevin Haasarud of HBO's US Comedy of Arts in Aspen will serve as celebrity relations and programming consultant. See Attachment E for management team listing. The 2000 Festival publicity consisting of newspaper, magazine, radio and trade publications coverage combined with their respective circulation numbers, received approximately 7.5 million impressions. The Festival was also included in several intemational listings of upcoming film festivals, and covered by the Hollywood Reporter and Vadety publications and websites. R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Filrn FestivaJ 2001 Staff Report.doc Festival filmmakers provided additional advertising on their own. Indiespace.com provided web hosting services for the Film Festival plus generated web marketing, links to film industry vendors and an On-line Film Market. VVebtrends reported over 50,000 hits from September 1 - 30, 2000, and 15,000 hits for October and November. Publicity for the 2001 event will include a direct mail campaign to film industry professionals, a public relations campaign to major industry trade publications, intemet, pdme national and local television news/entertainment programs. The local newspapers will be the Festival's pdmary advertising vehicles consisting of a media mix of broadcast, pdnt and outdoor advertising. Information speaking engagements with local service organizations, Community Theater, school and civic groups will also be scheduled. The Film Festival provides many economic benefits to the community. The Festival's effectiveness is measured by the filmmakers and musicians who attend the event. Through the exposure of a Film & Music Festival, Temecula is considered as a viable filming destination for the filmmaker's films, commercials, and television projects as well as forum for recording industry talents. The Film Council and Festival provides local jobs when filming projects come to the area. In addition, them is an increase in revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, and shopping centers while the Film Festival takes place as well as dudng filming projects ' throughout the year. The Film Council has generated many activities over the past year, which is outlined in Attachment F for your review. There will be no commissions, consultant fees and/or salades paid to any party from the City of Temecula's sponsorship. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been included in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5266) for the recommended sponsorship amount. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Advertising Agreement Attachment B - Sponsorship Package Attachment C- Business/Media Plan and Budget Attachment D - Recap of 2000 Temecula Valley Film Festival Attachment E - Festival Management & Operations Team R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports\Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc ATTACHMENT A - ADVERTISING AGREEMENT R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL This Agreement, made this 24~ day of April, 2001, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as ("TVIFF"). A. TVIFC will operate the "7th Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival" on September 13-16, 2001. The Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival is a special event located at the Movie Experience 10-plex at Tower Plaza in Temecula. Locations of the Festival's subsequent events will be held in the City of Temecula as well as Wine Country and at the Pechanga Entertainment Center. Attendance at last year's event was approximately 4,000 people. The anticipated attendance for the 2001 Festival is estimated at 5,000. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Major Sponsor of the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. In exchange for the payment of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00), the City of Temecula shall'be designated as a "Major Sponsor' of the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. In exchange for being a Major Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment B. B. Within 60 days after conclusion of the Film & Music Festival, TVIFC shall prepare and submit to the City Manager a written report evaluating the Film & Music Festival event, its attendance, media coverage, description of the materials in which the City was listed as a Major Sponsor and a financial statement of the revenue and expenses of the Film & Music Festival. C. TVIFC agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by mason of TVIFC's acts or omissions or those of TVIFC's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law. D. TVIFC shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TVIFC and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival '01 .doc '1 Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage provided on ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, Worker's Compensation Insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (D) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultants profession. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Worker's Compensation/Employer's Liability: Worker's Compensation as required by the State; and Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. Professional Liability Coverage: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. Liquor Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. R:\Wolnickg~Agendarepolts~ilm Festivat 'O'/.doc The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mall, postage prepaid, remm receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or TVIFC shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival '01.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by Chairperson and attest to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Temecula Valley Film Council, has hereunto subscribed this Contract day, month, and year hereinabove written. DATED: TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jo Moulton Founder and Advisory Board Temecula Valley International Film Festival Jeff Comerchero, Mayor City of Temecula ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival '01 .doc ATTACHMENT B - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc City of Temecula as Major Sponsor ($30,000) Sponsorship Benefits Include: · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all festival collateral materials. · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all applicable Broadcast and Print Media advertising, signege and press releases. · Acknowledgment of City of Temecula's sponsorship prior to and after every film screening, live music performances and filmmaking workshops. · Full page, black & white Inside Cover Page, City of Temecula ad in the program. · 10 complimentary tickets to the Opening Night Premiere and Reception. · 10 complimentary tickets to the Black Tie Awards Gala and Closing Night Wrap. · 10 complimentary tickets to all Festival workshops/panel discussions/seminars. · 10 complimentary tickets to all Nightly Networking Opportunity Parties. · 10 complimentary tickets to any pre-festival fundraising events. · 100 regular live music performance tickets for giveaway to city employees · 100 regular screening tickets for giveaway to city employees · Festival Souvenirs (festival shirts, mugs & hats) · Access to the VIP Hospitality Suite. · Acknowledgment of City of Temecula representativss st the Opening Night Premiere & Post Premiere Reception, Black Tie Awards Gala, Closing Night Wrap Party. · Opportunity to incorporate Festival Logo in any City of Temecula Marketing efforts, insertion of City logo in the festival websita and in the program sponsors' logo page. · Opportunity for City of Temecula to enhance community relations by involving City officials and employees in different aspects of the festival (fi.om festival presenters to hosts/hostsssss in all prime festival special events). As Host City, the City will always be acknowledged as a cooperative entity in the event tiffing regardless of who the eventual Presenting or Tire sponsor will be. TVlFF will secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of Califomia, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of the event a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City of Temecula is named insured or as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with the 2001 Temecula Valley Int'l Film & Music Festival. Coverage will provide the following minimum limits: General Liability - $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Liquor Liability- $1,000,000 combine single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE ,, 27740 JEFFERSON AVE~ ,, SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 * 909.506.4193 fax ATTACHMENT C - BUSINESS/MEDIA PLAN AND BUDGET R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc March 13, 2001 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE 27740 JEFFERSON AVE · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 RECEIVED 909 699 6267 * 909 506 4193 faxwww tviff com Mr. James O' Grady Asst. City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 IlAR 1 5 2001 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Dear Jim, Thank you for your letter dated February 26, 2001. The 6~ Annual Temecula Valley Intemational Film Festival (TVIFF) was a smashing success last September - with filled theaters, enthusiastic audiences, superb media coverage and great support from within Temecula and beyond. In fast, it is with great pride for me to inform you that TVIFF was recently named by the prestigious Ultimate Film Festival Survival Guide as one of the top nine "Best Kept Secret Film Festivals" in the United States. We joined the ranks of a few elite groups as Rhode Island, Ann Arbor, San Diego, Sedona, Atlanta and Portland International Film Festivals. This honor is significant as the author, Chris Gore, based his rankings on interviews he did with thousands of festival attendees of over 600 film festivals that currently exist all over the world. This explains the barrage of inquiries and request for entry forms to our festival months ahead of schedule. TVIFF 2001 is set for Sept. 13-16. New to the festival this year will be the music competition. Already the idea of Music of all genres in competition within a film festival is generating a lot of interest. Apparently there is no known film festival in the world that combines film and music in a competitive scenario. We are proud to set the stage. Another reason we look forward to this year is our collaboration with Amedcan Film Institute. Steve Montal, AFI's Director of Education & Program Development will help with film acquisition and programming as TVIFF's Film Program Director. Kevin Haasarud of HBO's US Comedy of Arts in Aspen has also agreed to sign on again as celebrity relations and programming consultant, thus enhancing the festival's ability to attract quality, critically acclaimed films and celebrities. Special tdbutes will now be given to several accomplished and celebrated arrays of actors/astresses, musicians/composers, directors/walters and film/music producers. Two Lifetime Achievement awards will be given for beth Film and Music. As in the past, we request the same sponsorship contribution of $30,000 from the City. We will raise the balance of funds required to produce the event. We would like to receive the sponsorship check to be released May 1, 2001. Because of the added Music competition component, sponsorship benefits will now include additional tickets to all music-related special events. Contract details remain the same. A complete festival information packet is enclosed. Should you have any questions pdor to the subcommittee meeting on Apdl 9, 2001, please call me at (909) 699-8681. Again, thank you for your continued interest in the festival. Sin(~lv~ ~,~ , Jo I~.dlton Founder/Director Our Vision With the belief that moving images and music are our culture's most influential art forms, the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival vision is clear. Our Mission To create an awareness of the diversity of film and music by presenting creative cinematic efforts and musical talents of people from various cultures and backgrounds within Temecula and beyond; To provide a stimulating, supportive environment and unique experience for independent filmmakers and musicians from around the world; To showcase the finest in film and music, while offering cultural, entertaining and educational opportunities for film and music lovers; And To provide grants to enhance existing high school film and music programs and scholarships to deserving film and music students. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699~6267 * 909.506.4193 fax Design By: The Ar[ 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Schedule of Events Opening Night Premiere & Post Premiere Festivities Thursday, Sept. 13, Movie Experience at Tower Plaza. Cocktails/Reception at 5:30pm/Screening at 6:30pm General Screenings/MusicFest Showcase Friday, Sept. 14- Sunday, Sept. 16, The Movie Experience at Tower Plaza, from 1 l:00am to 1 l:00pm. Fihn Screenings & music competition begins. Black Tie Awards Gala Saturday, Sept. 15, 5:300pm, Cocktails, 6:30pm, Dinner/Special Awards presentation (Awards of Excellence in various categories for film & music) Festival Workshop Series Saturday, Sept. 15-Sunday, Sept. 16, 10:00am-l: 00pm, The Movie Experience, Tower Plaza. lndustW experts' lead dialogues; workshops and panel discussions on various Film/Music industry related topics. Festival Marketplace Friday Sept. 14-Sunday, Sept. 16, 10AM -8PM, Tower Plaza Festive bazaar atmosphere. Art Gallew, Artisan arts & Crafts, Sponsor Row, Film/Music industry related booth displays. Festival Hot Air Balloon Experience Sunday, Sept. 16, 6AM. Am early morning jaunt over the lush vineyards of Temecula Valley for festival participants. Closing Night Premiere / Awards Ceremony & Wrap Party Premiere 5pm. Sunday, Sept. 16, The Movie Experience at Tower Plaza. Wrap/Awards Party, 7pm, Announcement of Film & Music Competition and Scholarship Award winners. Film Entries Accepted now. Visit www.tviff, com and download for entry form or e-mail, jmmoulton@earthlink.net or call (909) 699-6267 or fax (909) 506-4193. For music competition details, and consideration, contact the same phone, fax, e-mail and website information given above. Note: Events, times and dates may be subject, to change. 2001 Temecdla Valley International Film & Music Festival Schedule of Events & Ticket Information Opening Night Premiere & Post Premiere Festivities Thursday, Sept. 13, Movie Experience at Tower Plaza. Cockta~sa~eception at 5:30pm/Screnning at 6:30pm, $15 per person General Screenings/MusicFest Showcase Friday, Sept. 14- Sunday, Sept. 16, The Movie Experience at Tower Plaza, fi.om 11:00am to 11:00pm. Film Screenings & MusieFest Showcase begins. $4/screenings, $6/musicfest Black Tie Awards Gala Saturday, Sept. 15, 5:300pm, Cocktails, 6:30pm, Dinner/Special Awards. (Tributes & Awards in various categories for film & music), $75 Festival Workshop Series Saturday, Sept. 15-Sunday, Sept. 16, 10:00am-l: 00pm, The Movie Experience, Tower Plaz~ lndastl¥ experts' lead dialogues; workshops end_panel discussions on various Film/Music industries related topics. $5 per person Festival Marketplace Friday Sept. 14-Sunday, Sept. 16, 10AM -8PM, Tower Plaza Festive bazaar atmosphere. Art Gallery, Artisan arts & Crafts, Sponsor Row, Film/Music industry related booth displays. Free to public Friday Late Night Bash Friday, Sept. 14, 9PM. Filmmakers/Musicians Mingle and Party with the locals. Festival Hot Air Balloon Experience Sunday, Sept. 16, 6AM. Earlymorningjaunt over lush vineyards of Temecula for fcstivalguests. Closing Night Premiere/Awards Ceremony & Wrap Party Premiere 5pm. Sunday, Sept. 16, The Movie Experience at Tower Plaza. Wrap-Film/Music/ScholarshipAwards Party, 7PM. $15 per person Special Ticket Packages: One Day Film/Music Pass, $20 - Workshop Series Pass, $15 - Festival Pass, $150 How to Purchase Tickets General Admission tickets and special festival ticket packages may be purchased through the TVIFF at the Hospitality Suite or at the Festival HQ starting September 1, 2001. To purchase ticket by phone or mail, please make checks or money order payable to 'rV]FF and mail to: TVIFF, 27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecuia, Ca 92590. For credit card users, we are set up to accept only Visa or Mastercard. All pass and ticket orders by phone will be held at WILL CALL at the Festival Box. Office. Pick Up at WILL CALL starts September 10, 2000. All ticket sales are final. No refunds or exchanges. For info, call TVIFF at (909) 699-6267 or www.tviff.com or va*Jte us do TVIFF, 27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecula, Ca 92590. Note: Events, times and dates may be subject to change. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. ° SUITE ~00 ,, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax TVlFF FESTIVAL FACTS WHAT? The 2001 Temecula Valley thtemational Film & Music Festival marks the 7~ annual film festival presentation and the inaugural edition of the music competition component of the festival. For the first time in the festival's history and for four days in September, Temecula will witness and host the marriage of two influential arts forms - Film & Music. The best up and coming creative talents in film and music from all over the world will compete for recognition, honor and prizes. Indeed, the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival is a celebration of unparalleled movie and music magic that has truly come into its own. The prestigious Ultimate Film Festival Survival Guide recently ranked our festival as one of the top "Best Kept Film Festivals" from a field of 600, worldwide. Temecula joined the ranks of Rhode Island, San Diego, Ann Arbor, Sedona, Atlanta, Ohio, Taos and Portland. WHEN? As autumn a~ves in Temecula, so does the festival. The 2001 event is set for Sept. 13-16. WHERE? The Movie Experience 10-plex at the Tower Plaza. HIGHLIGHTS Each year, at the Black Tie Gala, a Lifetime Achievement Award is given for the honoree's significant body of work, achievements and contributions to Film. For 2001, the festival will honor not one but two artists- one for Film and one for Music. Past recipients include: Howard Koch, award winner producer of $ Academy Awards, The Manchutfan Candidate, Maverick, The Odd Couple. Plaza Suite, The Untouchables, etc. Robert Wise, Diredor of Sound of Music, West Side Story, Sand Pebbles, Andromeda Slrain Carl Reiner, Wdter, Comedian, Director- The Jerk, That Old Feeling, Oh Ged, Dick Van Dyke Karl Malden, Award wining actor- Streets of San Frendsco, Patton, Birdman of Alcatraz, Gypsy, On The Waterfront, SYeatcar Named Desire, How the West Was Won, SKAG, Fatal Vision, etc.. Shirley Jones, award winning ada*ess-Oklahoma, Partridge Family, Elmer Ganfly, Music Man. Michael York, B~ish stage and film actor- Austin Powers, Three Musketeers, Murder on the Odent Express, The Omega Code, Romeo and Juliet, Cabaret, Zeppelin, Logan's Run, etc. Opening Night and Closing Night Premieres and Post Premiere Festivities Daily screenings of no less than 80 futi-length features, short films, music videos, documentaries, animation and student films from all over the world. Awards given to winners judged by jury and audience. Performances of all genres of music (jazz, blues, country, rock, pep, reggie, world music, etc.) by bands and individual vocal performers at the Music Compe~on. Awards given to winners judged by jury and audience. Workshops, panel discussions on film and music-industry related topics. Q&A sessions with producers, directors, writers, musicians & actors Festival Marketplace - Artisans' bazaar and Film / Music business showcase CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 * TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax WHO PARTICIPATES AND WHO ATTENDS? Countries who have participated in the past include Brazil, Portugal, England, Germany, Ireland, Philippines, Spain, Australia, israel, China, Japan, Poland, Holland, Italy, The Netherlands, Canada, Greece, Turkey, Mexico and Swilzerland. Schools who have participated in the past include: USC School of Cinema & Television, UCLA Schools of Theater and Film, NYU Tisch School of the Arts, American Film Institute, Columbia University, Columbia College, California Institute of the Arts, Northwest Film School, University of Texas at Austin, Florida State University, San Diego State University, San Francisco State University, UC-Santa Barbara, UC-Santa Cruz, Boston University, Los Angeles College, Chaparral High School, Penn State University, Regent University, Loyola Marymount University, Syracuse University, Art Center College of Design-Pasadena, Wesleyan University, Emerson College, Los Angeles City College, Stanford University, Cai State-Long Beech, Chapman University, Grauer School, Creative and Performing Arts Academy of San Diego, Children's School of La Jolla, Academy of Our Lady of Peace High School, San Diego, Andrew A. Robinson Elementary School, Jecksonville, FLA, Cleveland High School, Espanola High School, NM Production companies and film distributors who have participated in the past include Miramax Films, Lion's Gate, MGM / UA, Sony Pictures Classic, Tddent Releasing, FX Shorts, Cineguanon Pictures, Buena Vista, Panorama Entertainment, Seventh Art Releasieg,Star Cinema Films, Blue Rider Pictures, Maslak- Frladenn Films, Bigel / Mailer Films, Hypodon Studio, PFG Entertainment, Palomar Pictures, CBS News, Beyond Films. OTHER IMPORTANT FESTIVAL FACTS The Festival is a great addition to the roster of Temecula annual events. It is an event with cultural, educational, social and positive economic impect on the community. In the same token that it has had the benefit of local business and community support, the Festival has reciprocated by using and hiring the services of local professionals and businesses. The Festival has awarded scholarships to students from Chaparral High School, Linfield High School and Uurdeta Valley High School. The first five years, the Festival's attendees have come mainly from outside Temecula and were almost 80% composed of filmmakers. For the year 2000, the Festival saw a marked increase not only in visitors but also in local residents' attendance. In a study done by Webtrends for Indiespace.com of Santa Monica, the Festival website, w,w.t~com, averaged over 150,000 hits from Sept. 1-30, 2000 (approximately just under 5,000 hits a day). For the months of October and November, 2000, two months after the event, the site still averaged 18,000 and 15,000 hits or 587 and 516 hits a day, respectively. The festivaJ has received the last six years over 3000 submissions, selected and screened over 460 full length features, shot[s, documentaries, and student films from 20+ countries, including wodd and U.S. premieres. TVlFF FESTIVAL FACTS WHAT? The 2001 Temeoula Valley International Film & Music Festival marks the ~ annual film festival presentation and the inaugural edition o! the music competition component of the festival, For the flint time in the festival's history and for four days in September, Temecula will witness and host the marriage of two influential arts forms - Film & Music. The best up and coming creative talents in film and music from all over the world will compete for recognition, honor and prizes. Indeed, the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival is a celebration of unparalleled movie and music magic that has truly come into its own. The prestigious Ultimate Film Festival Survival Guide recently ranked our festival as one of the top "Best Kept Film Festivals" from a field of 600, worldwide. Temecula joined the ranks of Rhode Island, San Diego, Ann Arbor, Sedona, Atlanta, Ohio, Taos and Portland. WHEN? Asautumna~sinTem~ula, sod~sthe~stival. The2001e~ntisset~rSept. l~16. WHERE? '- TheMo~eEx~en~ l~plexatthe ~werPlaza. HIGHLIGHTS Each year, at the Black Tie Gala, a Lifetime Achievement Award is given for the honoree's significant body of work, achievements and contributions to Film. For 2001, the festival will honor not one but two artists- one for Film and one for Music. Past recipients include: Howard Koch, award v~nner producer of 8 Academy Awards, The Manchurian Candidate, Maverick, The Odd Couple. Plaza Suite, The Untouchables, etc. Robert Wise, Director of Sound of Music, West Side sio,% Sand Pebbles, Andromeda Strain Call Reiner, Writer, Comedian, Director- The Jerk, That Old Feeling, Oh God, Dick Van Dyke Karl Malden, Award wfning actor- Streets of San Francisco, Patton, Birdman of Aicatraz, Gypsy, On The Watedront, Streetcar Named Desire, How file West Was Won, SKAG, Fatal Vision, etc.. Shirley Jones, award ~nning adrass-Oklahoma, Pedddge Family, Elmer Ganby, Music Man. Michael York, Bdgsh stage and film actor- Ausb'n Powers, Three Musketeers, Murder on the Orient Express, The Omega Code, Romeo and Juliet, Cabaret, Zeppelin, Legan's Run, etc. Opening Night and Closing Night Premieres and Post Premiere Festivities Daily screenings of no less than 80 full-length features, short films, music videos, documentaries, animation and student films from all over the wodd. Awards given to winners judged by jury and audience. Performances of all genres of music (jazz, blues, country, rock, pep, raggae, world music, etc.) by hands and individual vocal performers at the Music Competition. Awards given to winners judged by jury and audience. Workshops, panel discussions on film and music-industry related topics. Q&A sessions with producers, directors, writers, musicians & actors Festival Marketplace - Artisans' bazaar and Film / Music business showcase CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 * 909.506.4193 fax But don't just take our word for Jr, here's what they say about our festJval... "Another orbit for Hollywood... Hollywood has landed its s~tarohip in Temecula, in the heartland of Southern California Wine Country..." The Morning Report, Los Angeles Times "After having been to numerous film festivals including Cannes and Sundance..I can honestly say yours was one of my happiest experiences. Your festival really provides an invaluable personable forum for independent filmmakers to screen films outside the context of Hollywood." Kevin Haasarud, Program Director, HBO's US Comedy of Arts Festival, Aspen "A lot of small films get lost in big festivals. The few that get through get all the attention. I look at this festival as a second chance- - a re-birth." Charles Leventhal, Hollywood Director, "Mr. Write" "Just wanted to thank you for all you and your staff did to make the TVIFF happen. We met great people, made good contacts, saw a few really good films, got groat positive feedback on our film, enjoyed the gala and the workshops, and loved the location. We left quite happy." James McCabe, Director, "Who You Know; Baltimore, MD "I want to say thank you for your hospitality. We had a groat stay. We enjoyed the festival immensely. We were also very pleased with the reception our film received by the audiences and other filmmakers...we were thdlled to be invited to participate in the festival. I really appreciate the opportunity to screen my film three times, have time to network with other filmmakers, and to participate on all the other activities. I wish you the best for next yea¢." Phil Seneker, Prod/Director of"rats!" Seatle, WA "We are still coming down from a great tdp to LA and Temecula. Everyone we met at the festival were so pleasant-it makes my heart warm to remember all ~he organizers, volunteers and filmmaking teams we met...Thanks for the support you gave our film. The extra screenings-made the trip really groat for us especially to be one of the favorites." Jennifer Treur, Director/Writer, "Not Not Now", Sydney, Australia "Il was a great experience screening my film in Temecula... I got some nice feedback and support from those who attended. The theaters were among the best I've screened at and I enjoyed exploring Temecula. I hope to get the chance to screen some of my future projects there." Jim FleJgner, Director, "From the Top of the Key; Los Angeles, CA "We had a groat time for the few days that we could be in Temecula. You organized a groat festival. You showed many films from first and second timers, which wouldn't get shown anywhere else. You gave everyone three screenings, which other festivals often don't do. And thero were always a number of films showing. The balloon dde and the car rally were wonderful additions. Good luck on future festivals!" Greg & Renee Tennan~ Producer/Director: "The Distraction", San Francisco, CA "Thank you for making the TVIFF an enjoyable experience. I had a lot of fun while thero, and I appreciate all the efforts of you and your staff of volunteers. Thanks!" John Tranchina, Director, "Just Outside the Door", Dallas, Texas CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE, ,, SUITE ]00 * TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259o 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax Think Are you a :l°eal. band or individual performer Io~~kln~ to make'a splash on the seene? Showcase yom' talent, join and eompetc~ with h ' " 9 t e worlds best atthe 200i Tern YalleY International Musie. Festival En[~rY Deadline: & details, %11 (9'09) 699-626i~ 'mmouiton®earthllnk.net or visit, CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE I00 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259o : Please' c6~le~ th~ ::fo~::~elow. as neede:al' Send complete~Brm alonff with your tape/CD, phota and bio, and Fil ti3 m &MRsic:~es al 27740 J e er'S~n Ave. : TemeCUi~ CA 925~0 ~ :.~:: ............ . :: :: :::~:::~ ::: .:: : :~: :?' For consideration, a!l:r~:i~C~ ~!ements must accompany you~ ~p~lication. ~:~:: If you would like:~ofi~mat~ff~:thM'~O~'~t~ h~ b~n ~eived please ~::::~:~: ~nciuae a ~e~-aaaf~:~a:¥~peU postcard w~t~ your ~u~m~on. ~nt~ mater¢~ ~in ~ ~e~ an~ may ~ ~ f0~ f~ promotion~. Name o~ Band/Arti~:~ Address: No. of Band================= == == = === .M~ : Short Name Th : tt d: ii?:?::: [] payable to TVIFF) ~:.:::::::~ ~.J p ~:: .: [] Publicity Materials i Photos ::: ::: For more info, call: 909.699.6267 · fgx 909.506.4193 e-mail: jmmoulton@earthlink.net ° www. tviff.com This significant world class mu~i~ :co~P~Ri~r~¢~n{ 9f the aO0 ~ Te~ Va~t~ lnt'l Fil~ Mmic F~tiyal i, d~i~ to showc~e the music vision and a~istic wiza~ o~ mlent~d individual~ ~fid ~6~ ~ acr~ ~ a~d amend the w~ld. Emerging, up and c~i~'~hsigned p~f~ifig a~iSts arid: bands. ~T GES~S ~OF MBSIC ARE CONSIDERED? uSic From Rock and Roii t0 C~[i~ ~an Folk, ~:~:~::: ~:~i:~an, Jazz, ~tin ~ythms, Count~, Big Bafid~: Blues~'~:7~]~S, R & B, M:~:~ :Caj~:::Pop to~B~adway Tunes rank~ of res For conside~:i~h~ contestants will c6~F :i fi to compete.as finalist~ i~;~h~:~ will C~e from the ntertainment industry. ette or videotape. If selected, all ;. Winners of the Battle o1: the Bands will go on September 13-16, 2001. :::: F~r ~side r~! applica~ ~ ~ submitted wiih ~ th~ re~r~d ~ements by --5 i~ 2~: ~ !i::: . 1. A ~pe or CE A photo of'a~i~ ~ ~:~: ~l~hrly labeled on the ha& (Photm submitt~ : ~he ~e of music perfo~ed 4. Press kits and any media info~ation ~11 not ::, available for $25, made payable to: 'Temecula Valley lnt'l Film Fes~val ~FD" I f selected, be sent via mail, fax, ~i~i ~:6~::{$1ephone no later than July 30, 2001. Fill ou~:i of t~i:s fo~ arid Sefid ~}~ ail ~fi~ ?e~uired elements listed above, to: do 277~0 Jefferson Ave., Suite 100 * Temecula, CA 92590 ::: For more:info~ation, call ~:::~ (909) 699-6267: ~} ~:~iil :~~°filton&eanhlink-net · :::::.:. or visit our site at ~.wiff.com CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUI~ ~00 · TEMECU~, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax This significant world class mu~i~ eo~petiti6~ ~6nt of the 2001 Temecula Va!Icy Int'l Film& Music FesdW, i is designed to showcase the music vision and artistic wizardry of talent&d individual~::~d ~fi~ ~ across America and around the world. WHO ~RE ~ pARTI~IPANTg~ Emerging, up and cSn{iri~ ~hsigned p~riormin~ ~r~:i~s arid bands. WHAT GENRES OF MUSIC ARE CONSIDERED?::.: CONTEMPORARY, T~DI~i~L, ROCK, POP, EOLK AND WORLD MU~i:~ From Rock and Roll:to c~i~i~; A&~i~:an Folk, ~:~l: ~14:;i~:an, Jazz, ~htin Rhythms Country, Big Bandl Blues ::f~i:glfi~F~S, R & B, Mai:ia~hll Caju~ ::F'op to B~:~adway Tunes Judging will be b~ fidjddi~a~fi~ ~fid will c~e from the ran~s of respect~:ku~ic ~f~i~fi&i~ 0f:th~ :academe ~:~:~t ~e entertainment industry. 4Ow E!:eOk EsT, rrs SErECTED? For consideration; anyod~i:i~te~:~ is requir~a ~ ~:~nd::~ CD:i: fi:~:aib~gg~ette or videotape. If selected, all contestants:will c6~pe~:i~ a~:~fi~na3y: Ba~l~ ~f ~ B~fidS. Winners of the Battle of the Bands will go on to compete as finalist~ i~ ~h~ 260 ~ :T~m~Edi~::9~ii~: ifi~ernati6fiil Eil~ ~M~Sic Festival, September 13- 16, 2001. 1. A ~pe or CD ¢i{h h~: 1~ ~an 2. A'photo of arti~:~ g~ ~i~krly labeled on the ba& (~otos submittea ~11 not be returnS,j: 3. ~i~ ~Ba,d Bi~t ~nd'the Wpe of music perfo~ed 4. Press kits and any media information available 5. ~'~hi~r~ ~:or ~ O~aer for $25 made payable to: 'Temecula Valley Int'l Film FesUval ~FF)" If selected a nbfia~ ~f ~kcepf~ ~ill be sep~ via mail, fax,:::~:2~ail ~f b:~:::f~lephone no later than July 30, 2001. Fill out a~:~!~0n on th~ back of this fotm a~d send ~:~fi ~ii ~ f~uired elements listed above, to: TVIFFjTA~m~ M0ulton c/o 277~0 Jefferson Ave., Suite 100. Temecula, CA 92590 .: ::::: (909) 699-6267:::~:f::~::~ail~ j~oa!ton&eanhlink.net ..?~. or visit our site at ~w. wiff.com CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JE[FERgO~ AVE. · [HITE 100 · TEM[CH~ CAUFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 ~ax ..' .~ ': Friday September q:~ ~ Sundas'[ September 16, 2001 : :'.:: :~:::: ::::~ T°~.f Plazal N.W/~:~r~ier of Yn:ez & Rancho California Rd. : ::':i i: : T~:m~cula. California. For non~pi:0fit~, give us a call for spectal rates. :.: 10'xl0' exhibit space, a table with linen and two chairs: ::: ii. If electric outlet is required, there is an additional charge of $20.00 Artisans, Handcrafters, Specialty Items & Anyone who has a umque product, service, talent: Idea or concept to Pitch, Sell or Promote Tar ' endar Fill out information on the back of this form and Send or fax itto: :::: Temecula Valley International Film& MuSic Festival i:~:::27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecula~ Ca 92590 Fax No. (909) 506-4193 Or call (909) 699-6267 or e-mail: jmmoulton@earthlink.n6t Or visit our site at www!tviff.com CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE ~00 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax Vendor Application and Agreement Address: :~i~i~i~:. Phone: Fax: ~¥~:: e-mail: WEB URL, if any agrees to rent exhibit space at the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. Vendor agrees to rent. space(s) for the sum of $ Exhibit space is 10~ x 10' and includes linen and two chairs. Electricity, if needed, can be provided, for an additional fee of $20.00 The Festival Marketplace is open from 12:00 noon to 7pm, Sept 14 ~ Sept 15 and 12:00 noon to 4pm, Sept 16, 2001 Payment in full must be received at time of reservation. Please make check payable to: Temecula Valley International Film Festival (TVIFE~iiiiii~: Signature: Date: Print Name: CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 2774O JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE 27740 JEFFERSON AVE · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 9096996267 · 9095064193 fa× www tviff corn 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Scholarship Award Program To: High School Counselor The Temecula Valley International Film Festival and Cinema Entertainment Alliance request your assistance in facilitating the Cinema Entertainment Alliance Scholarship Award by first notifying your students about the scholarship opportunity and then by submitting/mailing the applications to the TVIFF at 27740 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100, Temecula, Ca 92590 by August 24, 2001. Cinema Entertainment Alliance's strong commitment to providing an environment for creativity to flourish through education and hands-on training is the basis for establishing the Cinema Entertainment Alliance Scholarship Awards. Requirements: Temecula Valley area (Public or private) high school graduating senior Students desiring to pursue some form of higher education Students intending to work in the industries of music, theater, film, video or multimedia Minimum GPA of 3.0 Completed application form One completed essay Application must include: Completed application form (typed or neatly written) High School Transcript Essa)441 - Signed by Teacher/Counselor, indicating authenticity We will be awarding 2 one-time scholarships of $1,000.00 each recipient (for a total of $2,000). The scholarship committee will make a final decision by September 1, 2001. Recipients will be notified by telephone, fax, e-mail or regular mail no later than September 3, 2001. Presentation of scholarship awards will be at the festival's Closing Night Wrap Party & Awards Ceremony, September 16, 2001. We greatly appreciate your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, Jo Moulton Festival Founder & Director The 2001 Temecula Valley Int'l Film & Music Festival Sponsorship Package ElementS The festival sponsorship package is tailored to meet the individual sponsor needs. The following ara a vadety of programs included in the sponsor benefits package based on sponsor level of participation: Advertising: Advertisement in the 2001 Official Program. Sponsor racognition in the TVIFF event advertising in print/broadcast media, whenever applicable. (Time and space allotment will dictate sponsor recognition availabitity) Publicity: Extensive distribution of press ralease announcement of sponsorship. On site interviews of sponsors in printJbroadcast media may be arranged, whenever possible. Corporate Logo: Placement in corporate sponsor page of event official Program. Placement in event program with the sponsored film screening(s) or event. Placement/mention on print/broadcast media advertisemen{s, whenever applicable. Placement on the TVIFF web site. Corporate Banner: Placement of sponsor banner at any or all festival theater and special event venues for the full run of the festival, whenever possible. (Subject to venue approval) Corporate Signage: For sponsors of specific film screening (s) or special festival events, a sponsor sign display board will be craated to announce sponsorship of the screening (s) or event. Corporate Literature: Sponsor literafura, brochures or promotional items may be displayed, distributed at various festival venues throughout the full run of the festival. Information and corporate tables will be set up in Ihe lobbies of the festival theater venues, the festival box office, media center and the Hospitality Suite. Web Site: WWW.TVIFF.COM is the official year-round site of the TVIFF. Sponsorship is acknowledged with sponsor logos and brief sponsor bio. Hyperlinks to sponsor websites can be established. Specific Corporate Identification: Depending on sponsor level of participation, a sponsor name may be attached to a specific portion of the film festival, as the "Official" supplier of product or service. Hospitality Suite: Sponsors will have access to the Hospitality Suite. This suite is raserved for special festival guests, filmmakers and sponsors. Ticketing and Special Passes: All sponsors will receive complimentary tickets and passes to all performances, workshops and special festival parties. Ticket and Pass allotment will depend on level of sponsorship. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. ° SUITE 100 ° TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax MARKETING PLAN The 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival's marketing strategy will consist of the following: INTERNET MARKETING Indiespace.com will once again provide Web Hosting services for TVIFF plus generate web marketing, links to film industry vendors and an On-line Film Market for all participants that includes streaming trailers. Owner Jeannie Novak has represented the Santa Monica film Festival and Newport Beach Film Festival. This new partnership will provide a new and exciting approach to expanding the festival's audience. Webtrends reports 2000 TVIFF to average over 50,000 hits from Sept. 1-30, 2000, just about 5,000 hits a day. Two months after the 2000 TVIFF, the site still managed to pull respectable numbers (15,000 hits for October and November). DIRECT MAIL Informative and timely brochures, updates, reminders and bulletins will be sent via direct mail campaign to filmmakers, film distributors, production companies, talent agents, publicists, schools, musicians, recording studios, music -related trade magazines and websites. PUBLICITY & MEDIA RELATIONS Extensive public relations campaign before, dudng and after the festival. Although area newspapers and publications, radio and cable are our pdme target outlets for event coverage, major industry trade publications (Rolling Stone, Spin, Hollywood Reporter, Daily Variety, Screen International), tour and travel publications will be aggressively pursued for calendar listings, story editorials as well. Prime national and local television news/entertainment programs such as Entertainment Tonight, Access Hollywood, VH-1, etc. will be tapped for strategic story placements. Festival fac~ sheets will be distributed to travel publications, local event calendar guides, chambers of commeme, area schools, area organizations. Information speaking engagements with local service organizations, theater, school and civic groups will be scheduled. ADVERTISING Although local newspapers will be the festival's primary advertising vehicles, a media mix of broadcast, pdnt and outdoor advertising will be scheduled two months before the festival. Cross promotions with festival sponsors and advertisers will be aggressively encouraged. Display billboards in malls, on screen advertising in theaters, posters, free standing inserts or brochures and ticket giveaways are just a few of the high impact promotional ideas planned to advertise the festival. TRADE SHOWS As in past years, TVIFF will continue to participate in industry trade shows such as the Amedcan Film Market in Santa Monica, Locations Expo and ShowBiz Expo in Los Angeles. TVIFF will also collaborate with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce and City of Temecula's Marketing and Toudsm trade show activities by providing them with TVIFF promotional materials for mass distribution. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE ,, 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. ,, SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 * 909.506.4193 fax 2001 Temecula-Valley International Film & Music Festival Advisory Board (in Alphabetical Order) Maggi Allen, President, Temecula Valley Film Council Eve Craig, President, Temecula Valley Historical Society Terry Gilmore, VP, Paradise Chevrolet, Cadillac, Oldsmobile Kevin Haasarud, Program Director, HBO/US Comedy Arts Fest in Aspen Mike Kerrigan, Syndicated Columnist, Calpix International Herbert Margolis, President, Cinema Entertainment Alliance Steve Montal, AFl, Director of Education & Program Development Jo Moulton, Founder, Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival Dan Stephenson, Chairman/CEO, Rancon Corporation Pamayla Ziolkowski, VP, MarPam Productions PAST LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD HONOREES Howard W. Koch, Producer (1995) Robert Wise, Director (1996) Carl Reiner, Writer/Director/Comedian (1997) Karl Malden, Actor (1998) Shirley Jones, Actress (1999) Michael York, Actor (2000) YR 2001 Nominated Recipients* Robert Stack, Actor James Garner, Actor Sally Field, Actress John Frankenheimer, Director Kenny Rogers, Singer Smokey Robinson, Singer/Lyricist Butt Bacharach, Composer Dolly Patton, Singer/Actress Special Tribute to the Golden Girls (Betty White, Bea Arthur, Rue Mclanahan) *All the above will be contacted to confirm acceptance of award and availability. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 1oo * TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699,6267 * 909.506.4193 fax 2001 Confirmed Sponsors, to date Sanbom Theaters, Inc. Pechanga Entertainment Center Paraside Chevrolet-Cadillac-Oldsmobile Rancon Real Estate Subaru of North America Federal Express Indie Grip & lighting Sammy's Woodfired Pizza Potamus Press KATY Radio Timmy D. Productions Indiespace.com PTIversen.com The Art Department Eve Craig Cooperating Entities Temecula Valley Film Council Inland Empire Film Commission CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Budget Expenses Festival Markefin $30,000 Printing $6,000 (collaterals - posters, programs, invitations, flyers, general info brochures Graphics Design $4,000 (design of all festival collaterals) Publicity / Advertising $20,000 (Trade shows, print and broadcast media buys) Festival Operations Transportation $3,000 Hospitality Suite $2,000 Accommedaiions $3,000 Trap hies/Plaques/Certificates $1,000 Film/Music Compe~on Cash Pdze $6,000 Scholarships $2,000 Secudty (3 days) $2,500 Equipment/Stage Rental $10,000 Theater Rental $6,000 Insurance $4,000 Postage/Freight $2,000 Telephone $3,000 Memhandise $3,000 Memhant Display Rentals $2,000 Party Rentals $2,000 Website Maintenance $1,000 Miscellaneous (Con~ngency) $2,000 $54,500 Special Events Opening Night, Closing Night $3,000 Black Tie Awards Gala $12,000 $15,000 Festival Management & Production Coordination Fees for PmduclJon and Programming, Technical, Editorial and Talent Rela'dons, Marketing and PR/Media Relations (LA & Temecala) Sponsor Bevelopment commissions, Film & Music Adjudicated Jury and consultant fees TOTAL FESTIVAL BUDGET $148,000 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax 2001 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Budget Projected Income Sponsorships $80,000 Ticket//Event Sales $96,600 General Admission Screening Tickets @ $4. 5 screenings in 4 theaters for 3 days @ $4/person wi average viewer attendance of 60/screening, $14,400 General Admission Band/Music Performances @ $6. 6 acts in 2 theaters for 3 days @ $6 per person w/average audience of 200, $43,200. Opening Night Premiere & Concert @ $15 $15 x 200 paid tjx, $3,000 Black Tie Awards Gala @ $75 $75 x 200 paid ~ckets, $15,000 Closing Night Premiere & Wrap Party @ $15 $15 x 200 paid tickets, $3,000 One Day FilmlMusicPass @ $20, good for ail day screenings & music pen~ormances $20 x 300 paid tickets, $6,000 Festival Pass @ $150.00, good for all screenings, music performances, workshops and parties. $150 x $0 paid tickets, $9,000 Festival Workshop & Panel Discussion, @ $5 $5x300 paid attendees, $1,500 Workshop Pass @ 15, good for all workshops and panel discussions $15 x 100 paid attendees, $1,500 Merchandise $4,500 Shirts @ $10 x 300, $3000 / Mugs @ $5 x200, $1,000 / Programs @ $1 x 500, $500 Entry Fees 200 x $25+$5,000/200x $10 (students) = $2,000 $7,000 Exhibit / On Site Promotions Fees, 30x$200=$6,000 $6,000 Total Projected Income: $194,100 Lees Event Expenses $148,000 Projected Net Proceeds: $46,100 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE ~oo ° TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY To quote former California Govemor Pete Wilson, "As an art form and as a commercial interest, movies have thrived in California. Providing entertainment to millions of viewers, employment to thousands of people, and attracting large amounts of revenue for our fine state, the movie business is an integral part of the California economy, and the greater American experience...a film festival is an appropriate celebration of the industry. ' As 2001 Temecula Valley International Film and Music festival expands beyond its Temecula borders, our audience has become more diverse. Not only have we reached the film industry (and the music industry this year), we have touched almost every part of the world. Proof is the recent recognition of our event as one of the top 'Best Kept Secret Film Festivals' from a field of 600, worldwide. The appearance of a city or region on the big screen and television screens is a highly coveted form of free advertising. Filmed entertainment and live music performances combined with celebrity studded gala events are natural magnets for such 'free advertising' vehicles. Without a doubt, there is no more cost-effective a showcase for the promotion of an area's attractions than a world class event such as The Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival A celebration of the imagination through film and music CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. * SUITE 100 * TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 9259O 909,699.6267 * 909.506.4193 fax ATTACHMENT D - RECAP OF 2000 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report.doc The Press Enterprise Publication dates: September 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 2000 6th Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival ~ talents all over the worldm ,,: ~ ,,~ ~'~ iAl:~entation ot Cinema Ente~inm~'~tAJliance ~ cz~oerz~ wr~h ~e Ci~ of Temecula. ' ~,, ' , ~e Te~ ~ ~ ~ ~ the ~eater Foun~hon. sponsorship ~ ~'~*~"*~ I*~1 pa~icipation by: CH~OL~.~DI~C.OLD~O8~ I~'~'1 And ~an~ to our o~er sponsom: ~e Promenade, ~ 101.3fm, T94.5 ~K-~, Neighbors. tnlandEmpire Magazine , Communi~ Pubii~tions Group , The Rancho News , EnteAainment Roundup . The Press-Enterprise , Froggy 92.9, ~lla's Italian Gdll, Prestos, S~dium P~a. InteHors ~or T~ay. ~e Californian. Fallbrook National Bank, Uni~ ~ ~ California, Isle of Man Tourism. FedEx, Firerose Communi~fions, Temeku Hills Golf & Coum~ Club Indi~pam.~ Indie Gdp & Lighting Big ~reen Ci~ ~mmy Productions Po~mus Pre~ Bob Baker Subaru. ~sbad C~ Gear A~en Real~ Inc. ~e Mer~ants of Tower Pt~ Emba~ Suites, ~e Movie Experience. Tem~u~ Cr~ I~. He~ E C~aig, Jon L~kin B~d, PT lversen.com. Millennium ~mousine. Inc.. Baskets & Ba~l~ns Apr-12-01 08:39A Ti,,u,,y O. Productions 909 6931682 P.02 TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL 2000 Strategic Marketin~ Summa~ Overall the 2000 £cstival succeeded in getting extcusive local, ~regional, national and inte/-national ~xpost.re. International exposure for the festival and the City of Temecula is real/zed through internet exposure as well as marketing from each of the individual film festival panic/pants. (See attached). International exposure is proven through participation from companies such as Virgin Atlantic Airways and isle of Man Tourism Board. Regional and national exposure is also realized through internet exposure and individual film entries marketing efforts. C ompames sttch as Miramax, Indiespace.com and Del Mar Thoroughbred Club partnered with the festival in promotion activities. The marketing strategy ofthe 2000 Festival emphasized highly on local media coverage. Due to past attendance fignres, organizers deliberately focused marketing efforts towards promoting community awareness and educating locals on what a film festival has to offer. High local visibility resulted in victorious local atteudance numbers. Locals not only attended the festival bnt also learned what a film tbstival otters. The overall consensus from locals was very positive. TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAl, 2000 Media Impressions Summaq, Based on press clippings from various newspapers and publications such as The Press Enterprise, North County Times, Union Tribune, Los Angeles "l'imes, Daily Breeze, Daily Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Long Beach Press Telegram, The ' Californian, San Diego Union Tribune, San }3ernardino Sun, Country Review, Neighbors Newspaper, Vineyard Press, Entertainment Round-up, Temeeula Valley Chamber of Commerce Newsletter, Temeeula Valley Business Journal and Rancho News, combined estimated impress/on is 7,500,000. In addition, TVIFF general information brochures and spec/al event invitations were mailed and distributed to schools, production companies, tv and film distributors and Temecula/Murrieta residents. Broadcasl coverage included mentions, promotional ads and ticket giveaways in KATY, KTMK, and KFRG. Several local businesses d/splayed posters and distributed brochures. Apr-12-01 08:39A Ti~y D. Production~ gO9 6931682 P.04 Print Media Impressionn Country Review Daily Breeze IO, O00 Daily Variety Entertainment Round-up ltollywood Reporter LA Times 1, I { 1,000 30,O00 3O,OOO Long Beach Press Telegram Neighbors Newspaper 15,000 North County Times 100,075 Pechanga Entertainment Center - Employee Newsletter Rancho News San Bernardino Sun 80,000 San Diego Union Tribune 378,766 Tcrnecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Newsletter 2,000 The Calilbmian The Press Enterprise ~Ihe Vineyard Press Union Tribune Valley Business Journal Radio KATY # o f spots KTMK available KFRG # of'spots 10,000 1,500 Not 10,700 Apr'-12-01 08:39A T'~,,,..y O. Pr'oduct~ions 909 6931682 P.06 Web-sites www.iviff, com ~---v~Ew._~_~- ien_~, fict jo n. _COrn ',"/~ ~,'. i n__&.'.c~!~, cc corn .Links Www. FihnFes[ vaIs.com v,~. Hollow _o3~1..col~! w ww.i www.lndicWire, cgra The Californian q · ~0.'2, oo0 Temecula preview night a success Steve Phelps, TVIFF workshop coordinator, and Pamela Miod and Molly Mathes, volunteers. Terry and Cindy Gilmore of Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac Oldsmobile, sponsors. Jim Meyer of the Temecula Arts Council, with Bev Hoff- man. festival volunteer, an.d, Joan Tussing, chamber b~ard Ellen Watkins with Kathy F(Moas of The member. Califemian, a festival sponsor. q - · 'ZOOO The Temecula Valley International Film Festival, which begins Thursday and runs through Sunday, re- cently held a Preview Night to introduce many film- makers, producers and actors, in- cluding those from short films and movies that will be screened ing festival. Some came from as far away as New York to get a peek at what's in store. The TVIFF Preview Night, held at the Tower Plaza Movie Experience Theater in Temecula, featured delicious hors d'oeu- wes from Presto's Gourmet Grill SYLVIA and wines from Wilson Creek ROCHIN Winery. SELBY Masters of ceremonies Bever- ly Stephenson and Timrny d. in- troduced the preview film, "Shergar," which won both the critics' and audience awards at last year's festival. "Shergar" stars Ian Holm, Mickey Rourke and Dav/d Warner in a true story of a legendary champi- on racehorse that was kidnapped and held for ran- The film, produced by Blue Rider Pictures, was filmed on the Isle of Man, which has a very active film program. The movie appropriately began with the sound of trumpeter Larry Grosman. The Isle of Man Film Council came on board as sponsors this year and donated a pr/ze for a fabu- lous vacation, including airfare and hotel accommo- dations on the British island. Drawing tickets can be purchased during the festival. Major sponsors this year are the city of Temecula, Pechanga Entertainment Center, Paradise Chevro- let Cadillac Oldsmobile and Rancon Real Estate. Call the festival office at 699-6267 or visit www. tiff.com. For Social Scene coverage, call Sylvia Rochin Selby at (7~0) 740- ',~,54, or fax information to (760) 745-3769. pLoducers~of 'Ll~at sum~me_ r in LA.' with Mike Kerri- gan, festival program (flrector. April Bouchard, from TVIFF presenting sponsor Pechaoga Entertainment Center, with Tom and Mona Strong of Potamus Press, Lee Tussing, and more volunteers. From left, Walter and Pat Josten of Blue Rider Pic- tures, with some cast members from 'Shergar,' The Californian RON LYNN / FOR TIlE CALIFORNI.\N Filmmaker Julia Stemock, who produced 'Foreign Correspondents' discusses her film at the Temecu- la Valley International Film Festival on Sunday. Visiting filmmakers prize atmosphere in Temecula LISA WEISS Temecula is hip. At least that's what filmmakers in town for the Temecula Vallev International Film Festival thought of a city some of them did- n't knuw existed until th~v arrived here with their films this weekend. ' They praised the city's relaxed atmos- phere and friendly peepl~, as welI as how ef- ficiently the festival was run. "I didn't know where Temecula was. but I've now gone to the Wine Counto,, to ~ome antique shops and to some good restau- rants,'' said producer Steve Stapinski, who came from Boston with his short film, "Sporting Dog," about a gambling attorney who makes a wager with serious conse-- quences to get out of debt. He said if he had another film bv this time next year, he would definitely co'ne to the festival again. Y. II the films and workshops were in {me '1 didn't know where Temecula was, but I've now gone to the Wine Country, to some antique shops and to some good restaurants.' -- STEVE STAPINSKI Producer fihnmakers could relax and chat between screenings. "At some festivals, the films are shown in a gymnasium or a town hall and thev just hm;e a folding table set up for the fi]n~mak- ers," said Los Angeles-based film producer Julia Stemock. who brought her feature film Rancho News q 'zooo Film festival dtaws ' a cro va ..... Photo by Heather Carawan / Community Publications Group Writer and director Javier Grillo-Marxuach attends the opening night ceremonies with his fiancee Darra. His short film "Cops on the Edge" was featured at the festival. · ....... : ....... ' · - -~ By Tony Ault Cornmunitv Publications Group TEMECULA -- Record- breaking attendance, rave com- ments from film producers, actors and even praise from the mayor may have quenched the fires of doubt that the annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival didn't bring enough acclaim to the city. At least that is what Temecula Mayor Jeff Stone is going to report to his colleagues on the city council who ques- tioned the festival's v/~lue in attracting film production com- panies and tourists to the-com- munity. Stone, who attended the four-.day festival's opening cere- momes last Thursday, the sold- out Black Tie Lifetime Achievement Award banquet for actor Michael York on · Saturday night and viewed a half-dozen films, praised the 'efforts of the festival promoters. He said the film festival has gone '"over the hump," by · becoming a world-class event. What surprised the festival promoters -- including its founder Jo Moulton and Mike Kerrigan -- was the attendance at the opening night cere- See FESTIVAL, A-8 Photo by Heather Carawan / Community Publications Group Jay C. Resar, associate producer and actor for "That Summer in LA," attended opening night, which attracted about 375 people. FESTIVAL monies. Numerous'fil~ pr~)~lu~em, ~t~;s'and directors from as far away hs France were in attendance. ' · ... "I never expected we would see this many filmmakers here tonight," said Thursc~ay just before th~ first screemngs at the Movie Experience in the Tower Plaza. Kerrigan said several producers, despite a foul-up in airline reservations and accommo- dations, flew in from France and London to be in attendance. "It's amazing. But, here they are," he said. · Ticket sales figures released Monday showed festival organizers that attendance was up more than 300 percent from last Year. Early figures indicated that about 3,00(J tick- ets were sold Friday through Sunday for the more than 80 films premiering at the festival, festival officials reported. Last year the total was only 825. The 3,000 tickets sold do not include the 328 people on hand at the Temeku Country Club Black Tie dinner where Michael York was presented his Lifetime Achievement Award· The opening night ceremonies drew approx- imately 375, while closing ceremonies brought about 275 to the theater comp!ex Sunday. Stone, who before this year s festival joined his fellow councilmen in criticizing the event for poor attendance and the lack of interest by filmmakers looking for new location sites. This year the city provided $30,000 to the festival to help defray their expenses in' hopes it would bring more business to the community. The :ouncil told promoters that unless they could ;how the benefit the event brings to the area, 'hey may withhold their support in 2001. "I thir~k the festival has gone over the hump Film festival names 'best'award winners The following is a list of the Temecula Valley International Film Festival's best feature, for- eign, student and docu- mentary films as selected by judges and those attending the premieres Sept. 14-18 at the Movie Experience in the Temecula Tower Plaza: "Sporting Dog," second place ~Best Student Film: "Clara" · Best Documentarv: "My American Grandmother" Jury Award Winners: Audience Choice Award Winnem: Best Feature Film: "Seven Girffriends," first place "Rave," second place Best Foreien Film: "My Mother Frank," first place "The Wedding Cow," sec- ond place Best Short Film: "The Ladies Room L.A.,' first place Best Feature Film: "Bread and Roses" "'Best Foreign Film: "Best" Best Short Film: "Odessa" Best Student Film: "Thursday Afternoon" Best Documental_: "Up Syndrome" Outstandin~ Community Service Award "Every 15 Minutes" this year," Stone told reporters. "I've been impressed with the turnout and I'm looking forward to next year. They made a believer out of me." Adding to Stone's observations Was an announcement immediately after' the festival that Cinema Entertainment Alliance and Film Artists Network (FAN), an international .coop- erative of Independent Filmmakers were to host a Mini Film Market Monday (Sept. 18) through Thursday (Sept. 21) at the Movie Experience. Filmmakers' had an opportunity to show their 35mm features to potential film buyers and distributors, like HBO and Showtime. ~GHLAf~I~' to hype cause as much as movies. See Page 3. Southwest Riverside Cc I~I~EI~IWT filmmakers Iommm for risks, see Page e. The sJxlh annual Temecuia galley International Rim Festival plays through Sunda: Festival is a veritable British Invasion The Californian [] Organizer finds English influence a pleasant surprise BARBARA MC LEAN FOR THE CALIFORNIAN Accidents aren't supposed to be something to get excited about, but Jo Moulton was pleasantly surprised when she took a look at finished plans for the sixth annual Temecula Valley International Film Festi- v'al. Moulton, the event organiz- er, said she is excited about this year's "accidental" British theme. "Several of our films are British and our Lifetime Achievement Award goes to MichaelYork, plus we have sew emi films by British directors and some that feature British actors," Moulton said. "In fact, Virgin Atlantic Airways was so interested that they joined as last-m/nute sponsors." Mouhon, who is the founder of the festival and has been in- volved in each one, has im- proved it to where major stu- dios have noticed. "Last year, we had 15 fi/ms from MGM when they were celebrating their 75th anmver- sary," she said. "This year, we have three films from Miramar, so we are definitely attracting the atten- tion of some of the larger movie companies." The obvious question that arises from such attention is "What is the impact for South- west County?" Moukon believes the acci- dental British Invasion in cine- · FESTIVAL Continued fi*om 3 Organizers notice a distinct British feel in the films, invited guests ma has increased tourism. She recently received a phone call from the Tourism Board from the Isle of Man. "They were so excited that we showed a movie here that was filmed on the Isle of Man," she said with a giggle. Kelly Daniels of Timmy D Productions has helped Moul- ton this event. Daniels shares the excitement for the week- end. "There is definitely an in- ternational approach, because the people that are making the films are also marketing the films, so in a roundabout way, they are also marketing the Temecula Valley," Daniels said. Film crews have also been known to come to town. Daniels, who worked for 10 years with the Temecula VaUey Chamber of Commerce, credits the festival for that. "The film companies eat l~ere. ~r °~ur..~e~n~,.~he · ' said. "They stay in our hotels, cept B: use our copy shops and shop in an Ind our stores. It's great for busi. the ir ness." movie. The festival will utilize The Son Movie Experience theaters at tries r, Tower Plaza on Ynez Road in val, art Tem.ecula. An advantage of that Philipl setnng will be stadium-style Canad~ seating. ' Swit~e: "This is definitely a plus," In a Moulton said. "To have our noted films shown in a nice theater have s will certainly be enjoyed by the cludin~ public and screeners alike." and Te The festival will feature 17 versit3 world premieres -- which in- School eludes seven features, two doc- FiLm S~ umentaries and eight "shorts" of Texa -- and 12 U.S. premieres. The Although Moulton has pre- shops t viewed many more films than niques. what will run at the festival, role of she has picked a personal fa- Aisc vorite, will ge~ · The movie is based on a wid. Worksk ow who wants to attend college a.m. to with her son. Sunda.~ "I just loved 'My Mother shop is Frank.' It is a drama-comedy so The typical of today's society," she schedu~ said. sion is Major stars are included in Wrap a the films. Pierce Brosnan of the Awards James Bond film series stars in day. Ad "Grey Fox." $10. The movie is based on the As fl true story of Archie Grey Owl. missim Moulton thinks what kept the films m film out of mainstream release be purc .wa_s_..t...h_.a.t p~e o p. l_e. _w. oul~n_ ~.t..: ~ :. Call AC JAMES CURRAN STAFF WRIT~P, Hard to believe the hands that hold swords and break boards can also be the ones to offer help. But when Adrian Paul -- the actor who stars in the "Highlander" television show and movie series -- comes to Southwest County for the Temecula Valley International Film Festival, he will be offer- ing advice on the entertain. ment business and seeking in- put for a charitable organiza- tion he created. Paul, who reprised his role as Duncan MacLeod in the currently released movie "Highlander: Endgame," will appear at t~vo events for the festival. Paul will hobnob with people who attend the Satur- day evening gala. He will fol- low chat at 10 a.m. Sunday at Scarcella's Italian Grill in Temecula with an informal discussion about film and on Protect, Educate and Aid Chil- dren Everywhere. PEACE schedules celebri- ties to appear at schools around Southern California. Once at the schools, these "guest stars" participate in things from stay-in-class dis- cussions to interactive story- telling. Unlike other celebrities who simply lend a name to a project, Paul said he created PEACE from scratch. "I've been in charities be- fore," Paul said. "The success of the ('Highlander') series -- with what kids saw in me as a role model -- I would like to see if I could get others to teach kids the way they teach me. A lot of celebrities never The Californian the high road Adrian Paul comes to festival to talk films, charity q ~%, 2.0GO HIGHLANDER Continued from Paul thinks that 'Endgame' could be his swan song as an 'immortal' 'One word -- determination .... There's a lot of good actors who didn't make it because the didn't have the determination.' -- ADRIAN PAUL On how to make it in the entertainment industry had really gone to events where kids would learn a life lesson." Paul is an exponent of hung kar kung fu and was an accom- plished dancer before he started acting. He played MacLeod for six years on the TV show, in which a ~l~t society of people called "immortals" walked the earth with only one way to die -- decapitation at the hands of an- other. MacLeod and other im- mortals would live for centuries, elirrfnadng each other for sport while gaining sU'ength. The movie earned mom than $6 migion in its flint week in the- aters and is still in the Top 10 box office releases. In "Endgame," Paul's Duncan is teamed with his brother -- played by Christopher Lambert -- to take on an immortal with far superior strength. But al- though "Highlander" has a vio- lent prermse, Paul said b_is char- acter had grown sick of swords toward the end of theTV show. "It's interesdning," Paul said. "In a sense, he became much more laid back. It was like he was saying 'I want to live in a peaceful existence. I don't want to do this: He does thJn~ out of necessity and to me, that's who heroes are." Paul said he thinks that as the character grew, as did he. "I think always when you play a character, it becomes a part of you -- especially in a se- ties," Paul said. "Everything I do is a bit of yin and yang. Over time, you realize you don't have to be that aggressive. It leaves you lopsided as a human." Still, "Endgame" holds a bit of truth in the rifle. "I think this will possibly be my last 'Highlander' project," Paul said. "I do not want to be pi. geonholed as Duncan MacLeod." Paul said he is currently working on a number of other projects -- as a writer and divec. tor as well as an actor. He is par- ticularly fascinated with a con- cept based on the life of Giovan- ni Giacomo Casanova. "He's a 17th century James Bond, if you will," Paul said. "It's a script we're shopping around, finding out if they'd be interest- ed in it as a movie, a mini-se- ties." '~ Originally, Paul was sched- uled to'appear in Temecula for an informal talk about what it takes to make it in Hollywood. Although his itinerary has changed, he said his counsel would be simple. "One word -- determina. rion," Paul said. "You beat your head on the wall enough times and either your head splits or the wall splits. There's a lot of good actors who didn't make it because they didn't have the termination. You have to have · talenr~ but you have to keep do- ing it." If the tip is worth something to local people, Paul is also hop- ing it ~arrants a donation. "We basically mn it on a shoestring," he said. "There are a lot of donations from fans .... but the kids get so excited. (rye heard) a teacher say '~est results went up after you guys came in: That made me very happy. "It's a slow process, but I'm very passionate about it:' Local Businesses, Or,qanizations and Resident Professionals that TVlFF hired, bought goods/services from or donated money to, YR 2000: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. g. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. Scarcella's Italian Grill Califomia T's The Califomia.n Temeku Grill Mexicana Restaurant American Fence Co. Potamus Press Stacy Sievek -Indie Grip & Lighting Starway Productions Timmy d. Productions, Inc. The Movie Experience Sign For Success Motel 6 Millenium Limousines, Inc. Temecula Trophy A Grape Escape Balloon Adventure-Rusty Manning Strachota Insurance Katie Crisp of Chaparral HS Laurin Kendrick of Murrieta Valley High School Office Depot Staples Kinko's Local US Post Office Local Federal Express Stater Bros. Von's Aiberston's Rite-Aid Lowe's The Theater Foundation Kelly Daniels Ellen Watkins Michael Filanc Jo Mou]ton Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Teresa Kolbes Circuit City Interiors for Today Baskets & Balloons Too Arden Realty/Tower Plaza Joann Fabdcs FireRose Communications Rower CorraJ CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. ° SUITE ~00 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909,699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE 27740 JEFFERSON AVE · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 9096996267 · 9095064193 fax www. tviff corn YR 2000 Temecula Valley International Film Festival Income Report CASH SPONSORS 1. City of Temecula $30,000 2. Pechanga Entertainment Center $20,000 3. Paradise Chevmlnt Cadillac Oldsmobile $10,000 4. Rancon Real Estate $ 5,000 5. Bob Baker Subam-Carlsbed $ 5,000 6. Fallbrook National Bank $1,000 7. Union Bank of California $1,000 8. Eve Craig $1,000 SUB TOTAL: CASH $73,000 TRADE/IN-KIND SPONSORS VALUE 1. The Press Enterprise $I 0,000 2. Potamus Press $ 7,500 3. Arden Rea~, Inc. $ 5,000 4. Sanbom Theaters, Inc. $ 5,000 5. The Californian $ 5,000 6. Entmtainment Roundup $ 5,000 7. KATY. 101.3 FM $ 5,000 8. K-FROG 92.9 $ 5,000 9. Indiespane.com $ 5,000 10. Barder& Barder Advmtising $ 5,000 11. Community PublicalJons Group $ 2,500 12. Neighbors $ 2,500 13. Inland Empire Magazine $ 2,500 14. FedEx $ 2,500 15. C~ystal Geyser $ 2,500 16. Timmy d. Productions $ 2,500 17. Isle of Man Tourism Board $ 2,500 18. Prasto's Gourmet Express $ 2,500 19. Indie Grip & Ughting $ 2,500 20. The Promenade Mall $ 2,500 21. PT Iversen.com $ 2,500 22. Big Screen City $ 2,500 23. T 94.5 KTMK-FM $ 2,500 1. Scarcella's Italian Grill $1,500 25. Temeku Hills Golf & Counf~y Club $1,500 26. Embassy Suites $1,500 27. Temecula Creek Inn $1,000 28. Stadium Pizza $1,000 SUB TOTAL IN-KIND/TRADE: $96,500 Page 2, YR 2000 Temecula Valley International Film Festival Income Report TICKET SALES/CALL FOR ENTRY FEES Box Office Cash & Check Transactions Credit Card Transactions Call for Entry Fees $9,052.51 $1,394.76 $1,510.00 SUBCASH TOTAL: $11,957.27 TOTAL CASH INCOME FOR YR 2000: $84,957.27 TOTAL TRADE / IN-KIND INCOME FOR YR 2000: $96,500.00 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE 27740 JEFFERSON AVE · SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.6996267 · 9095064~93 fax www tviff corn 2000 Temecula Valley International Film Festival Expense Report Staff/Consultants/Commissions Jo Moulton Mike Kenigan Kevin Haaesrud Nova Pictures/Pster Bamstt Ellen Watkins Teresa Kolbas Kefly Daniels Exec. In-Charge of Production Film Program DirectorfCo-Writer Celebrity Relations/Consultant Programming Consultant Sponsor Development-commies/on Sponsor Development-commiesion Sponsor Development-commission SUB TOTAL: Marketing/Advertising/Promotional Expenses Calpix Int'l/Mike Ken'igan Timmy D. ProdsJKelly Daniels North County Times/Californian Sign for Success Barder & Barder Advertising California T's Timmy D. Productions Bernard Yin Uike Stephens $10, 000.00 $ 3, 000.00 $ 2, 500.00 $ 2, O50.00 $ 2, 250.00 $1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Film Projection/Expenses The Movie Expedenco Stacy Sievek MPG-Multi. Media P~s. Group Planet Post $23~750.00 PR/Media Relations Se~fcos-LA $ 3, 00O.00 PR/Media/Ad Sondess-Temecula $ 2, 750.00 P~nt Advertising $1,515.52 Banners and Street Signage $ 821.89 Markedng Collaterals-Posters/Flyers, etc. $ 4, 820.16 Fes~dval T-Shirts $1,497.00 Magician/Face PaJntJngtClowns $ 500.00 Hospitality Suite Promo (Band) $ 200.00 Hoepitali~ Suite Promo (Bend) $ 250.00 Prinfin,cl Expenses Potatoes Press SUB TOTAL: $15,354.57 Theater Rental Print/Traffic/Projection Se~icos VideslData Projection Rental Sony Betaesm SP Rental Special Events Expenses Cate~ng Expenses Starway Productions American Fence Co. Sunny Thomas $ 6, 000.00 $1,200.00 $1,500.00 $ 700.00 SUB TOTAL: ~ 8~400.00 Pfin'dng So, ices $ 3, 000.00 SUB TOTAL: $ 3,000.00 Temeku Grill Mexicana Soarcella's Italian Gdll Sound System Rental Fencing Expenses Uquor/Beverage Expenses $ 9,336.00 $ 119.90 $1, 20920 $ 5O0.00 $ 311.00 $ 879.29 SUB TOTAL: $12,355.39 Pa.qe 2, YR 2000 Temecula Valley International Film Festival Expense Report Special Guests/Filmmaker Expenses Hotel Room Accomrceda'dons $ 933.23 Miflenium Umousines Inc. UmolShuPJe service $1,149.50 Sovereign Exec. Se~ices Security $ 700.00 Temecula Trophy Michael York's Trophy $ 531.81 A Grape Escape Balloon Advent. Hot AJr Balloon Ride for filmmakers $ 500.50 SUB TOTAL: $ 3,814.54 Office/Misc. Expenses Office Supplies/Copying/Hospitality Suite/Operational Expenses Telephone Postage/Freight Sb'achota Insurance PSTSPS. Inc Richard Spencer Scholarship Dona'den Bank Charges Insurance Coverage Accounting Sen, ices Legal Services Katie Crisp-Chaparral HS Laudn Kendfick - Muninta Valley HS Theater Foundation SUB TOTAL: $2,504.4~ $1,340.62 $ 815.00 $1,811.75 $1,000.00 $1,050.00 $1,000.00 $1,000,00 $1,000.00 $ 99.34 11,571.19 TOTAL EXPENSES FOR YR 2000 $78,245.69 TOTAL CASH INCOME for YR 2000 $84,957.27 NET PROFIT (LOSS} $6,711.58 Submitted b~ /_.~ Moulton TVIFF Founder/Director Independently Audited for Cinema Entertainment Alliance by: Terri' Sl~afor, Enr~led Agent #55664 PSTSPS, Inc., a Professional Business Management Corp. P.O. Box 641097, Los Angelen, CA 90064 Account Type: Account Title: ACCOUNT BALANCE DDA Account Number: 07238-06649 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE DBA TEMECULA VALLEY INTL FILM FEST DBA SAN DIEGO WORLD FILM FESTIVAL Date Open: 3/99 Activity:10/24/00 Statement:10/18/00 [nfo Restrict: N FIT withhold: ACCOUlVT BALANCE: /h6%~7~I.~5~y Average Balance: 20,297.66 Available Balance: c-~67~g~1~'~'~ Minimum Balance: .00 Start Balance: 6,711.58 Interest Hold: .00 .00 Debit: .00 .00 Ver Credit: .00 .00 Unver Credit: .00 .00 NSF Days: 0 Maint Fee: .00 .00 No. of WD: 0 Ex WD Fee: .00 .00 BAL DUE BANK: .00 .00 Flags: Yr to date: Prior year: Unpd Interest: Terminal. Id: W0072638 User Id: ~ Thursday, Nov. 2,2000 11:22:44 NOTE: THE NOVEMBER BANK STATEMENT SHOUED INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Beginning Balance, 10/18/00 Wtihdrawals: Check No. Check No. Check No. $9,072.38 310 Theater Foundation (Donation) $1,000.00 329 Airborne Express (for Miramax Flints) $52.50 330 Donald Moulton (Phone reimbursements) $1,308.30 Ending Balance, 11/18/00 $6,711.S8' * R/, 711 .SB - Amount ihat will be reflected as ending balance for ~e November bank ATTACHMENT E - FESTIVAL MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS TEAM R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Film Festival 2001 Staff Report,doc Management & Operations Team The Temecula Valley International Film Festival core management & event operations team are composed of independent film industry professionals and local community film festival advocates: · Jo Moulton & Eve Craig, Founder & Co-Founder of the Temecula Valley Film Council and Temecula Valley Int'l Festival. Both will serve as this year's Festival Director and Festival Advisor, respectively. · Steve Montal, FestivaIProgram Director · Kevin Haasarud, Talent Relations & Film Programmer · Maggi Allen, Event Operations Director · Kelly Daniels, Marketing & Sponsor Development · Timmy D. Daniels, Music Competition Coordinator · Ellen Watkins, Marketplace / Presenters Coordinator · Stacy Sievek, Technical Director (Print/Traffic & Projection) · Pat Martinez, Black Tie Awards Gala Chairperson · Sunny Thomas & Joanne Flowers, Opening Night Chair & Co-Chair · Steve Phelps - Festival Workshop Series Chairperson · Patty Slaton & Pat Martinez- Closing Night Chair & Co-Chair · Sylvia Bula - Volunteers Coordinator · Shari Kuwahara - Sponsor Dev. Associate & Hospitality Chairperson · Darrell Connerton - Theater Operations/Presenters Coordinator · Mollie Mathes, Karen Connerton & Mary Williams, Guest Relations · Mark Jones and the Chaparral HS Video Class, Videographers · Lincoln King Cliby, Audience Choice Ballot Coordinator Together, the above group make a formidable team of talented and committed group of individuals with combined experiences in motion picture, television, public relations, event management and non-profit fundraising activities. CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALLIANCE · 27740 JEFFERSON AVE. · SUITE ioo · TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 909.699.6267 · 909.506.4193 fax ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~ II C,TY,,ANAOE /~,~'Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements (Project No. PW95-12) Southern California Gas Company (SCG) Work Authorization Agreement to Relocate an existing 6" High Pressure Gas Main PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize payment to the Southern California Gas Company (SCG) for construction fees in the amount of $27,409.40. BACKGROUND: On November 12, 1996, the City Council approved the Work Authorization Agreement with SCG and authorized payment to SCG in the amount of $23,234.00. The City received a revised invoice from SCG on March 22, 2001, which represents a fair representation of what additional costs the City is responsible to pay. The Work Authorization Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the relocation of the gas main. The requirements of the Work Authorization Agreement state that the City is responsible to pay for 50% of the actual cost of the relocation and any deviations from the proposed description of work made by SCG to meet practical requirements when required. Approximately 1989 feet of an existing 6" high-pressure gas main south of the Rancho California Road will be abandoned. The gas main is located about 400 feet south of the Rancho California Bridge within an existing gas easement in the State right of way, and also within an existing gas easement on the Union 76 gas station and Dennys properties. SCG constructed 1548 feet of new gas main from intersection of Old Town Front Street to the Caltrans traffic signal located on the east side of I-15 on Rancho California Road. About 1000 feet of new gas main was constructed within the new bridge section over 1-15 and 548 feet in the widened section on the south side of Rancho California Road. SCG decided to relocate 548 of new gas main along the widened portion of Rancho California Road between Old Town Front Street and the Caltrans traffic signal located on the west side of 1-15 on Rancho California Road and they were allowed to make that decision per the terms and conditions of the Work Authorization Agreement. 1 r:~agdrpt~2001~0424\pw95-12,SCG The total cost of the SCG gas main relocation with credits for depreciation on replaced gas properties was $169,847.56. One half of the costs the Citywould have been responsible for was $84,923.78, however, SCG provided a credit of $34,280.38 for SCG's convenience (Realigning the gas main within the widened section on the south side of Rancho California Road between Old Town Front Street and the Caltrans traffic signal located on the west side of I-15) and eliminated a previously included cost of $7,181.19 for AFUDC (Allowance Funds Use During Construction) costs. In the original agreement, the City's share of $23,234.00 represented the cost of what the City would have been responsible for, if the gas main was realigned to avoid the new northbound loop ramp and exit ramp. SCG decided to use the City's share of $23,234.00 to construct a new gas main through the widened section on the south side of Rancho California Road and the new bridge section over I-15. The benefit of this decision is to prevent future closures of freeway exit ramps to repair gas line breaks. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements Project was funded with Measure "A' and Capital Project Reserves. Adequate funds are available in account number 210-165-601-5804 for the required payment to SCG. ATTACHMENTS: SCG Work Authorization Agreement approved by City Council on November 12, 1996 2 r:~agdrpt~2001~0424~pw95-12.SCG DATE: TO: Mi~I~ING OF: AGENDA 1TEM No.: SUBJECT: MINUTE ACTION OF THE REDEV~JOPMENT AGENCY OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA November 14, 1996 'Don Spagnolo - Principal Engineer November 12, 1996 Item 4 1-15 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS, GAS COMPANY WORK AUTHORIZATION AGI~k'~'~H~]T WITH SOUTm~ CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR ~ RF~IOCATION OF A 6" HIGH PRF~qSURE GAS MAIN - PROJECT NO. PW95-12 The motion was made by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation with the amendment that a 10% contingency will be included. 4.1 4.2 Approve ~he Inl~agency Agreement and authorize the Chairperson to execute the documents. Authorize payment to the Southern California Gas Company for construction fees in the amount of $23,234.00 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 AGENCY MFMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAINED: I AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MF_RdBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: B'mtsall, Ford, Umdemans None None Stone Roberts, SOUTHERN CAL1]tORNIA GAS COMPANY - COLLECTIBLE WORK AUTHORIZATION To: Southern California Gas Company Serial No. P P.O. Box 3003 Rediands, CA 92373 File No.:GWO 72732 The Southern California Gas Company (hereafter "Company"), is authorized to alter its facilities, and City of Temectda, (hereafter "Purchaser") agrees to reimburse the Company for fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the work in connection with the relocation of 6" HP Gas main to clear bridge improvement work at Rancho California and the 1-15 freeway interchange. In Rancho California Road, install 1000' of 6" HP Steel Main & 300' of 12" Casing Estimated Cost $46,468.00 50°,{, of Es'dmatod Cost $23,23~-00 IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the above description is general in nature, that this authorization covers all work necessitated by the proposed project, and that deviation from the proposed description may be made by the Company to meet the practical requirements of installation such as safety, avoidance of structures, government authority, and Environmental Impact Reports when required. Requests for changes in the above described work for the convenience of the Purchaser may be rejected by the Company. If such changes are accepted, the Pumhaser agrees to reimburse the Company for the actual cost of such work unless otherwise agreed to in writing. THE ABOVE ESTIMATE IS FURNISHED ONLY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE PARTIES IIER~,TO. IT IS INTENDED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S GENERAL PAST EXPERIENCE OF THE COST OF SIMILAR WORK LrtqDER FAVORABLE CONDITIONS. BECAUSE OF UNFORESEEN CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER FACTORS, THE ACTUAL COST MAY BE CONSIDERABLY HIGHER OR LOWER THAN THE ESTI1VIATE. THEREFORE, TH~ ESTIMATE IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED A WARRANTY BY THE COMPANY OF THE ACTUAL COST. The actual cost, any agreed unit cost, or any firm estimate shall include overhead costs contained in the Company's appropriate billing formula. Payment is due and payable upon presentation of a bill to City of Teruecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590. In the case of defanlt or delay in payment, City of Temecula, shall pay to the Company all costs and expenses incurred in the collection of any sum due, including attorney's fees and court costs. A deposit of $23,234.00 will be made by the Purchaser as payment toward all costs for which the City of Temecula is responsible, to be incurred by the Company for work performed pursuant to this agreement. Purchaser agrees to pay, upon presentation, each billing issued for work completed and to make additional advance deposits whenever the Company determines the cost of the work completed has substantially equaled twice the amount of the deposit. If actual costs for which the City of Temecula is responsible exceed the deposit(s), the Pumhaser shall pay the Company the difference; if the total cost for which the City of' Temecula is responsible is less that the deposit(s), then the Company shall refund the difference. Company shall perform, or cause to be performed, all of the work described in this Agreement and shall assume all responsibility for said work being installed in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations and standards of the Company. The Purchaser shall indemnify and defend the Company against and save and hold it harmless from, any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, and costs of every kind and nature for injury to or death of any and all persons, including, without limitation, employees or representatives of the Company or of the Pumhaser, or any other person or persons, and for damage, destruction, or loss, consequential or otherwise, to or of any and all property, real or personal, including without limitation, property of the CompanY or of the Purchaser, or of any other person or persons, resulting from or in any manner arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work under this contract. Excluded from this paragraph are only those injuries to or deaths of persens and damage, destruction, or loss to or of property to the extent that such injury, death, or damages arises from the negligence or willful misconduct of the · Company or its employees or representatives. The Company shall indemnify and defend the Purchaser against and save and hold it harmless from, any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, and costs of every kind and nature for injury to or death of any and all persons, including, without limitation, employees or representatives of the Company or of the Purchaser, or any other person or persons, and for damage, destruction, or loss, consequential or otherwise, to or of any and all property, real or personal, including without limitation, property of the Company or of the Purchaser, or of any other person or persons, to the extent that any such injury, death, loss, or damage results from or in any manner arises out of or in connection with Company's negligence in the performance of the work under this contract.. ~n~,e undersigned hereby represent th. at ~e)' ~e authorized to execute this agreement on behalf of a-ny corporation, partnership, or other association hereinabove named. Agreed to and accepted this 12th dayofNavernbo, r ,19 ,90 . Southern California Gas Company Ci~I11~'~'~-' ~) ~ By:~ By: /~ ~dernans ATTEST: ~. Greek, CMC,, City Clerk TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 A P PRO ~'/~/, ~'-" CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOI~~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services -d~"~/. April 24, 2001 4TM of July Fireworks Presentation PREPARED BY: Julie Crowe-Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors award a contract to Pyro Spectaculars for the preparation and display for the 2001 and 2002 4th of July Extravaganza fireworks show presentations for an amount not to exceed $25,000 annually. DISCUSSION: A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was released by the City of Temecula to solicit qualified vendors to provide professional services for the preparation and display of the 4~ of July Extravaganza fireworks show presentations for 2001 and 2002 with a third year option to renew. Robert Caran Productions and Pyro Spectaculars responded to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and were interviewed by a panel comprised of representatives from the Community Services Department, the City Manager's Department, the Finance Department and the Fire Department. Based upon the vendors' overall interview presentation, reference list and past experience, the panel agreed unanimously that Pyro Spectaculars was the most qualified vendor to provide such specialized services for the City of Temecula. Services provided will include a licensed pyrotechnic operator, full electronic firing custom designed and choreographed twenty-three minute "Sky Concert", insurance coverage, sales tax and delivery, as well as a simulcast of the choreographed music via Temecula's local KATY 103.5 FM radio station. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to produce one (1) 4'h of July Extravaganza fireworks show annually will not exceed $25,000. Unencumbered funds exist in account #190-183-999-5370. R:\CROWEJ\AGENDAS\4th of July.01.doc PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC. Display Agreement (Special) 1) THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this__ day of 2001, by and between PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC., a California corporation hereinafter referred to as "PYRO" and City of Temecula, hereinafter referred to as "PURCHASER". 2) PYRO agrees to furnish PURCHASER, in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, one fireworks display as per Program C, submitted, accepted and made part hereof, including the services of a licensed pyrotechnic operator to take charge of and, along with sufficient helpers, safely discharge the display. The said display is scheduled to be performed on July 4, 2001 at Rancho California Sports Park, on the Hilltop next to the Fire Station #84 - Pauba St. 3) PURCHASER, at its own expense, agrees to provide to PYRO: A) A suitable DISPLAY SITE in which to stage the fireworks display, including a firing and fallout zone reasonably acceptable to PYRO in which the fireworks and fireworks debris may be exhibited, rise and fall safely. PYRO affirms that it has physically inspected the site and validate that it was acceptable as configured on the date of inspection. B) Adequate policing, guard protection, roping, fencing and/or other crowd control measures to prevent the access of the public or its property or any other people or property not authorized by PYRO into the DISPLAY SITE. C) The services and cost of standby firemen and/or any applicable permit fees as required' by state and local statutes, ordinances or regulations. D) Access by PYRO, at all times, to the DISPLAY SITE to set up the display. If PURCHASER fails to fully comply with requirements A, B, C and/or D set forth above, PYRO shall have no obligation to perform and PURCHASER agrees to pay to PYRO the entire contract price plus any additional expenses incurred because of said failure. If, in its sole discretion, PURCHASER designates an area for members of the public to view the Display ("Spectator Area") and/or an area for vehicular parking ("Parking Area"), the PURCHASER shall: E) Ensure that the Spectator Area does not infringe on the Display Area; F) Have sole responsibility for ensuring that the terrain of the Spectator Area and any structures thereon, including, but not limited to grandstands and bleachers are safe for use by spectators; G) Have sole responsibility for ensuring that the Parking Area is safe for use; H) Have sole responsibility to police, monitor and appropriately control spectator access to the Spectator Area and the Parking Area and police, monitor and appropriately control the behavior of persons in these areas. It is expressly agreed that PYRO, (including its operators and helpers) shall not inspect, police, monitor or otherwise supervise any area of the site other than the Display Area, except to ensure: I) That any Spectator or Parking Areas are outside the Display Area; and PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC, Display Agreement (Special) Page 2 J) After completion of the Display, that the Display Area is cleared of any live fireworks debris originating from the program. 4) PURCHASER shall pay to PYRO the sum of TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND Dollars ($ 25,000.00). A deposit of $12,500.00 must be paid by May 4, 2001. Full final payment is due the first regular business day after the date set for the display. A finance charge at a periodic rate of 1.5% per month, 18% annual percentage rate, or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less, will be charged on the unpaid balance after 10 days from the date of the display. PURCHASER, by signing this Agreement, authorizes PYRO to receive and verify financial information concerning PURCHASER from any person or entity. 5) PURCHASER agrees to assume the risk of weather, or other causes beyond PYRO's control, which may prevent the display from being safely discharged on the scheduled date, which may cause the cancellation of any event for which PURCHASER has purchased the display, or which may affect or damage such portion of the exhibits as must be placed and exposed a necessary time before the display. It shall be within PYRO's sole discretion to determine whether or not the display may be safely discharged on the scheduled date and at the scheduled time. If, for any reason beyond PYRO's control, including, without limitation, inclement weather, PYRO is unable to safely discharge the display on the scheduled date or should any event for which PURCHASER has purchased the display be canceled, the parties shall attempt to negotiate a new display date, which shall be within 60 days of the original display date. PURCHASER further agrees to pay PYRO for any additional expenses made necessary by this postponement. If they are unable to agree on a new display date, PYRO shall be entitled to liquidated damages from PURCHASER as if PURCHASER had canceled the display on the date set for the display, as provided in the following paragraph. 6) PURCHASER shall have the option to unilaterally cancel this display prior to the date of the display. If PURCHASER exercises this option, PURCHASER agrees to pay to PYRO, as liquidated damages, the following percentages of the agreed contract price. 1) 25% if cancellation three (3) or more days prior to the scheduled day of the display, 2) 50% if cancellation occurs within two (2) days of the actual date set for the display, 3) 75% if cancellation occurs on the date set for the display but prior to the time physical set-up of the display actually begins, 4) prior to the time physical set-up of the display 100% thereafter. If cancellation occurs prior to the date set for the display and prior to the time set-up has occurred, PURCHASER agrees to pay PYRO in addition to the above percentages, the value associated with any specific custom work performed by PYRO or its agents including but not limited to music/narration tape production and/or sponsors Iogos. 7) In the event PURCHASER cancels the display, it will be impractical or extremely difficult to fix the actual amount of PYRO's damages. The foregoing represents a reasonable estimate of the damages PYRO will suffer if PURCHASER cancels the display. PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC, Display Agreement (Special) Page 3 8) PYRO reserves the ownership rights and trade names that are used in or are a product of the pyrotechnic display to be performed herein. Any reproduction by sound, video or other duplication or recording process without the express written permission of PYRO is prohibited. 9) PYRO agrees to furnish insurance coverage in connection with the Display only, for the following risks and amounts: bodily injury and property damage, including products liability FIVE MILLION DOLLARS ($5,000,000) combined single limits. Such insurance shall be in accordance with Exhibit "A," and shall include PURCHASER as an additional insured regarding claims made against PURCHASER for bodily injury or property damage arising from the operations of PYRO in performing the Display provided for in this Agreement. Such insurance afforded by PYRO shall not include claims made against PURCHASER for bodily injury or property damage arising from A) Failure of PURCHASER, including through or by its employees, agents and/or independent contractors, to perform its obligations under this Agreement, including, without limitation, those contained in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement; B) Failure of the PURCHASER to provide discretionary Spectator and Parking Areas referred to in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement. PURCHASER shall indemnify and hold PYRO harmless from all claims and suits made against PYRO for bodily injury or property damage arising from A) and B) of this Paragraph. 10) If any legal action is brought to enforce or interpret the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which they may be entitled. 11) In the event PYRO breaches this agreement, or is otherwise negligent in performing the fireworks display provided for herein, PURCHASER shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to recover monetary damages from PYRO beyond the amount PURCHASER agreed to pay PYRO under this Agreement. PURCHASER shall not, under any circumstances, be entitled to recover any consequential damages from PYRO including, without limitation, for loss of income, business or profits. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a modification or limitation on the insurance coverage afforded in Paragraph 9 above, or upon PYRO's indemnification if PURCHASER for third party claims in the event PYRO fails to provide such insurance coverage. 12) It is agreed, nothing in this AgCeement or in PYRO's performance of the display provided for herein, shall be construed as forming a partnership or joint venture between PURCHASER and PYRO. The parties hereto shall be severally responsible for their own separate debts and obligations and neither party shall be held responsible for any agreements or obligations not expressly provided for herein. 13) This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. It is further agreed that the couds of the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate any disputes arising out of this contract or performance of the display provided for herein. It is further agreed that the Central PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC, Display Agreement (Special) Page 4 Judicial District of San Bernardino County, California, shall be proper venue for any such action. 14) Any Notice to the parties permitted or required under this Agreement may be given by mailing such Notice in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, first class, addressed as follows: PYRO - Pyro Spectaculars, Inc., P. O. Box 2329, Rialto, California 92377. PURCHASER - City of Temecula - 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92589- 9033, July 4, 2001 15) All terms of this Agreement are in writing and may only be modified by written agreement of both parties hereto. Both parties acknowledge they have received a copy of said written Agreement and agree to be bound by said terms of written Agreement only. 16) If there is more than one PURCHASER, they shall be jointly and severally responsible to perform PURCHASER's obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement shall become effective after it is executed and accepted by PURCHASER and after it is executed by PYRO at PYRO's offices in Rialto, California. This Agreement may be executed in several counter parts, including faxed copies, each one of which shall be deemed an original against the party executing same. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and upon their heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns. PURCHASER recognizes that because of the nature of fireworks, an industry accepted level of 3% of the product used in any display may not function as designed and this level of nonperformance is acceptable as full performance. Price firm through May 4, 2001. Price includes full electronic firing. PURCHASER to provide firing site, communications, and security. PURCHASER responsible for payment of fire department permit and standby fees, if applicable. In Witness Whereof the parties hereto, by and through their duly authorized agents, have set their hands and seals this __ day of ., 2001. PYRO SPECTACULARS, INC.: JAMES R. SOUZA, President PURCHASER: ., Title EXHIBIT "A" INSURANCE PROVISIONS Consultant shall maintain in full force, during the term of the service contract, limits of insurance, no less than: General Liability: $5,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability: Worker's Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. It is the Consultant's responsibility to notify the City if there are any changes in insurance provisions that would impact the above requirements. Insurance carrier(s) shall be approved to do business in the State of California and shall have a Best rating of no less than A:VII. Consultant shall furnish verification of the insurances required by this Exhibit A prior to performance of the work specified in the contract. ITEM 2 APPROVALS,/, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~E.._~j~,~_ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services April 24, 2001 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY 2001-2002 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst That the Board of Directors: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETrING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. The four current service levels of the TCSD include: 1. Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting. 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. The TCSD Rates and Charges for Service Levels B, C, D and R have not increased from last year. The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution accepting the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the aforementioned services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 2001-2002 and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues for June 12, 2001. Staff will then proceed with noticing each affected property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the June 12th public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 2000-2001 Rates and Charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection; and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The proposed TCSD levy budget for FY 2001-2002 is $4,447,937. A'I-rACHMENTS: Resolution of Intention for FY 2001-2002 TCSD Rates and Charges. Preliminary Levy Report for FY 2001-2002. RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989, votem approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ('q'CSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the TCSD in the same manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. The TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, servicing and administration of street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and street and road improvements for the 2001-2002 fiscal year. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, this Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the 12th day of June, 2001, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590, as the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time. Section 5. The District Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the Report and of the time and place of the hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 61765.2. Section 6. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 24th day of April, 2001. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2001 - was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 24th day of May, 2001, by the following vote of the Board of Directors AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: EXHIBIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1,2000, Muni Financial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002. Pursuant to the Community Services District ~_aw, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of four (4) service levels. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapinq and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Recyclinq, Refuse Collection, and Street Sweepinq. Operations and administration of the recycling and refuse program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. Service Level R - Street and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of unpaved streets and roads. The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 to be as follows: SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET Service Level B $ 420,228 Service Level C $ 984,496 Service Level D $ 3,030,326 Service Level R $ 12,687 $/SFR $ 25.68 Variable $172.56 Variable TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 2001-2002 $ 4.447.937 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 2001-2002 are as shown on the Levy Roll on file with the City Clerk/District Secretary. TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~CE. CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~ April 24, 2001 Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. A trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450 responses returned. The consultant is currently researching use of existing easements and connections within the City. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM Design Group on July 11, 2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. The construction documents have been submitted to DSA. Staff is finalizing their comments on the plans and specs and the Board of Directors have given authorization to release for public bid. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed in the City. Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors meeting. The first sub- committee was held on November 7, 2000. With the adoption of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan at the January 23, 2001 City Council meeting, it has been determined the 40 acre sports park will be located in the Wolf Creek development. The architect is currently reviewing the sports league questionnaires submitted by the Focal sports leagues and reviewing the plans and specifications for the proposed site. A community workshop was held on Saturday, April 7, 2001, and the architect is preparing a draft master plan based on the information received from the workshop and staff. R:~ZIGLERG~XDEPTRPT~0301 .doc April 19, 200l The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA is currently working on construction documents for submittal for first plan check. On June 15, 2000, staff released an RFQ requesting a Statement of Qualifications to prepare a feasibility study for the development of a Water Park. A contract was awarded to the Natelson Company at the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting, for the preparation of the Water Park Feasibility Study. A community workshop was held and the consultant completed the intercept surveys. The consultant has compiled the information received from the community workshop and intercept surveys and a committee meeting was held on March 7, 2001 to review the draft feasibility study. The consultant has modified the draft feasibility study based on comments from the sub- committee. A sub-committee meeting will be scheduled in the next 45 days to review the revised draft. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication, construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Exhibits and Environments. The Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2000. A committee meeting was held on Monday, March 19, 2001. The committee discussed naming the facility, space planning, and exhibit design and museum concepts. A community workshop is scheduled for Monday, April 23, 2001. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division recently held their annual Spring Egg Hunt event on April 14, 2001. The event included a hunt for Easter Eggs, party jumps, DJ's, and prize drawings, and held at Temeku Hills Park, Rancho California Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park and Rotary Park. The Recreation Division is currently in the planning stages for several citywide special events including the July 1, 2001 Vail Ranch Annexation Celebration, 4th of July Parade and Fireworks Program, and the Summer Concert Series. The Recreation Division continues to program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities. Staff is currently finalizing the 2001 Summer/Fall edition of the Recreation brochure, which will be mailed out to the local residents the first week of June. R:~ZIGLE RGLY. DEPTRPT~0301 .doc April 19, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APP ROVA~'-~/,. ~'"" City Attorney Director of Finance,' ~. City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/Redevelopment Agency City Manager/Executive Director Shawn D. Nelson April 24. 2001 Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority; Approval of Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2. That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA That the City and the Redevelopment Agency execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Temecula Public Financing Authority. BACKGROUND: Ashby Development Company, Inc., Calloway 220, LLC (collectively, the "Developers"), have requested that a community facilities district be formed to assist in the financing of public improvements in the Roripaugh Ranch area by means of the formation of a community facilities district under the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. The Developers have agreed to pay all City out of pocket expenses in connection with the proposed financing. City Staff, with the advice of the City's consultants, have recommended that various actions be taken in order to allow formal consideration of the Developers' request. R:~Caravelli Denlse',AGENDAS~Agendas Butterlield Stage~StaffRptClty.doc CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Formation of Joint Exercise of Powem Authority Page 2 The City Attorney has recommended that the City and the Redevelopment Agency form a joint exercise of powers authority in order to conduct the proceedings related to the proposed financing. Under California law, a joint exercise of powers authority is a separate legal entity from the public agencies that create it, and its debts and liabilities are not those of the public agencies that create it. it is proposed that the City and the Redevelopment Agency form the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), which would then consider the formation of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds necessary to finance the public improvements. Because the Authority will be a separate legal entity from the City and the Redevelopment Agency, no funds or assets of the City or the Redevelopment Agency will be liable for the payment of debt service on any bonds issued by the Authority. The bonds will be secured solely by the proceeds of special taxes levied on land included within the boundaries of the community facilities district. The City Council members will act as the Board of Directors of the Authority, so that they can control all aspects of any Authority bond issue. It is expected that the Authority will form a community facilities district in connection with the proposed financing. The proposed financing structure will ensure that only properties included within the proposed community facilities district will be taxed to pay for the bonds, and the bonds will be payable solely from the proceeds of those special taxes. The bonds will not be general obligations of the City or the Redevelopment Agency, but only limited obligations of the Authority, payable from special taxes levied on land included within the boundaries of the community facilities district. The Authority may establish other community facilities districts in the future in connection with the financing of public improvements in the City other than in the Roripaugh Ranch area and could also be used in connection with other City and Agency financings. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to begin the process to consider the formation of the community facilities district and the issuance of the bonds, the following actions must occur: The City and the Redevelopment Agency each must consider the adoption of a resolution authorizing them to enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement to create the Temecula Public Financing Authority. The City resolution also approves a deposit/reimbursement agreement with the Developers and makes a finding that the formation of the Authority, and the contemplated formation of a community facilities district and issuance of special tax bonds by the Authority are not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act. Following the adoption of their respective resolutions, the appropriate officers of the City and the Redevelopment Agency must execute the joint exercise of powers agreement. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority Page 3 The Temecula Public Financing Authority will then, by minute order, appoint a Chairperson, and consider adoption of a resolution with respect to meetings and other administrative matters. The Authority will also consider adoption of a resolution adopting local goals and policies for its Mello-Roos districts. Under applicable State law, a new community facilities district cannot be formed unless the entity which forms it has first adopted local goals and policies which satisfy certain requirements of law. The suggested local goals and policies only pertain to the specific financing contemplated by the Authority, and would not apply to any community facilities district that may be created in the future by the City. The Temecula Public Financing Authority will then consider adoption of a resolution of intention acknowledging receipt of a petition to form a community facilities district, and authorizing and directing the engagement of consulting firms and other actions related to the proposed community facilities district. FISCAL IMPACT: The Developers have agreed to pay all out of pocket expenses incurred relative to the proposed financing. Costs of issuance of the proposed bond issue will be paid from the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the joint exercise of powers authority. All annual costs of administering the bond issued will be paid by special taxes levied on the properties in the community facilities district. Neither the City nor the Redevelopment Agency will have any responsibility for the payment of debt service on any bonds issued by the Temecula Public Financing Authority. Attachments: Resolutions (2) Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, MAKING CEQA DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") desire to assist in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements in the City; and WHEREAS, in connection with such assistance, the City and the Agency propose to form a joint exercise of powers authorities pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, to exercise the powers of the City and the Agency, and to enable the use of financing techniques that may reduce local borrowing costs, and to otherwise promote the greater use of existing and new financial instruments and mechanisms, all in accordance with the financing and refinancing of public improvements by and through community facilities districts to be formed by such joint powers authority; and WHEREAS, a form of joint exercise of powers agreement (the "Joint Powers Agreement") between the City and the Agency creating the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), has been filed with the City Clerk, and the City Council, with the aid of City staff, have reviewed the Joint Powers Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to approve the Joint Powers Agreement, and to authorize its execution and delivery; and WHEREAS, Ashby Development Company, Inc. and Calloway 220, LLC (collectively, the "Developers") have requested that the Authority form a community facilities district and have advanced funds to pay costs of the City and the Authority related thereto; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement with the Authority and the Developers (the "Deposit Agreement"), regarding the disposition of funds advanced by the Developers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Formation of Joint Powers Authority. The City Council hereby authorizes the officers and staff members of the City to assist in the organization of a joint exercise of powers authority between the City and the Agency to be known as the "Temecula Public Financing Authority." The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor to execute and deliver and the City Clerk to attest the Joint Powers Agreement forming said joint exercise of powers authority, in the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by. the execution and delivery by the City of the Joint Powers Agreement. Section 2. Deposit A,qreement. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Deposit Agreement, in the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the Deposit Agreement. Section 3. No CEQA Proiect. The City Council hereby determines that the formation of the Authority, and the contemplated formation of a community facilities district and issuance of community facilities district special tax bonds involving the Authority, in accordance with Section 15061(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines are not a "Project," as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, and are therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(d) and 15062, the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a Notice of Exemption to be prepared, executed and filed in regard to the foregoing determination. Section 4. Official Actions. The Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the formation of said joint exercise of powers authority and the implementation of the Deposit Agreement, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of April, 2001, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Cler~Authority Secretary RESOLUTION NO. RDA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") and the City of Temecula (the "City") desire to assist in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements in the City; and WHEREAS, in connection with such assistance, the Agency and the City propose to form a joint exercise of powers authority pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, to exercise the powers of the Agency and the City, and to enable the use of financing techniques that may reduce local borrowing costs, and to otherwise promote the greater use of existing and new financial instruments and mechanisms, all in connection with the financing and refinancing of public improvements by and through community facilities districts to be formed by such joint powers authority; and WHEREAS, a form of joint exercise of powers agreement between the Agency and the City creating the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Joint Powers Agreement"), has been filed with the Secretary of the Agency, and the members of the Governing Board of the Agency, with the aid of Agency staff, have reviewed the Joint Powers Agreement and now desire to approve it and authorize its execution and delivery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Formation of Joint Powers Authority. The Governing Board of the Agency hereby authorizes the officers and staff members of the Agency to assist in the organization of a joint exercise of powers authority between the Agency and the City, to be known as the "Temecula Public Financing Authority." The Governing Board of the Agency hereby approves and authorizes the Chairperson to execute and deliver and the Secretary to attest the Joint Powers Agreement forming said joint exercise of powers authority, in the form on file with the Secretary together with any changes therein deemed advisable by counsel to the Agency, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Agency of the Joint Powers Agreement. Section 2. Official Actions. The Chairperson, Executive Director, Secretary and all other officers of the Agency, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the formation of said joint exercise of powers authority, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of April, 2001. AFl'EST: Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of April, 2001, by the following roll call vote: AYES: AGENCYMEMBERS: NAYS: AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: AGENCYMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT This Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated April 10, 2001, is by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation and public body, corporate and politic duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "City"), and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "Agency"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, agencies formed under Adicles 1-4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") are permitted to provide financing for any of their members or other local public agencies in the State of California in connection with the acquisition, construction and improvement of public capital improvements, working capital requirements or insurance programs of such members or other local agencies; and WHEREAS, the City and the Agency wish to form an agency under the Act for the purpose of providing an entity which can assist in providing financing and refinancing for public capital improvements in the City and for other purposes which are authorized under the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and of the mutual premises herein contained, the City and the Agency do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.0t. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in this Article shall, for the purpose hereof, have the meanings herein specified. "Act" means Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Agency" means the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula. "Agreement" means this Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, as originally entered into or as amended from time to time. "Associate Member" means a Public Agency which is a party to an Associate Membership Agreement entered into by the Authority and such Public Agency pursuant to Article VII hereof. "Associate Membership Agreement" means an agreement between the Authority and an Associate Member as described in Article VII hereof. "Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority established pursuant to Section 2.02 of this Agreement. R:\Caravelli Denise~AGENDAS~Agendas Buttedield Stage~JPAAgreement.doc "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Authority referred to in Section 2.03. "Bond Law" means the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, being Article 4 of the Act (commencing with Section 6584), as now in effect or hereafter amended, Article 2 of the Act as now in effect or hereafter amended, or any other law available for use by the Authority in the authorization and issuance of bonds to provide for the financing of Obligations, Working Capital Requirements, Public improvements and/or liability or insurance needs of any Public Agency. "Bond Purchase Agreement" means an agreement between the Authority and the City, the Agency or any Public Agency, pursuant to which the Authority agrees to purchase Obligations from the City, the Agency or such Public Agency, as the case may be. "Bonds" means bonds, notes or other obligations of the Authority issued pursuant to the Bond Law or pursuant to any other provision of law which may be used by the Authority for the authorization and issuance of bonds, notes or other obligations. "City" means the City of Temecula, California. "Directors" means the representatives of the City appointed to the Board pursuant to Section 2.03. "Fiscal Year~' means the period from July 1 in any calendar year to and including June 30 in the succeeding calendar year. "Members" means the City and the Agency. "Obligations" has the meaning given to the term "Bonds" in Section 6585(c) of the Bond Law. "Public Agency" means any public agency authorized by the Act to enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement with the City and the Agency. ' "Public Improvements" has the meaning given such term in Section 6585(g) of the Bond Law. "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Authority appointed pursuant to Section 3.01. "Treasurer" means the Treasurer of the Authority appointed pursuant to Section 3.02. "Working Capital Requirements" means the requirements of any Public Agency for funds to be used by, or on behalf of, such Public Agency for any purpose for which such Public Agency may borrow money pursuant to Section 53852 of the Government Code of the State of California. -2- ARTICLE II GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 2.0'1. Purpose. This Agreement is made pursuant to the Act providing for the joint exercise of powers common to the City and the Agency, and for other purposes as permitted under the Act, the Bond Law and as agreed by one or more of the parties hereto. A primary purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the financing and refinancing of Public Improvements or Obligations through the formation by the Authority of one or more community facilities districts, the acquisition by the Authority of such Public Improvements, and/or the purchase by the Authority of Obligations of the City, the Agency or any Public Agency pursuant to Bond Purchase Agreements and/or the lending of funds by the Authority to the City, the Agency or any Public Agency. Another primary purpose of the Authority is to assist the City in connection with City lease and installment sale financings and refinancings. Section 2.02. Creation of Authority. Pursuant to the Act, there is hereby created a public entity to be known as the "Temecula Public Financing Authority". The Authority shall be a public entity separate and apart from the City, the Agency, any Associate Member and any other Public Agency, and shall administer this Agreement. Section 2.03. Board of Directors. The Authority shall be administered by a Board of Directors consisting of five (5) Directors, unless and until such number is changed by amendment of this Agreement. The Directors of the Authority shall be comprised of the members of the City Council of the City. The Board shall be called the "Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority". All voting power of the Authority shall reside in the Board. Section 2.04. Meetin,qs of the Board. (a) Regular Meetings. The Board shall provide for its regular meetings; provided, however, that at least one regular meeting shall be held each year. The date, hour and place of the holding of regular meetings shall be fixed by resolution of the Board and a copy of such resolution shall be filed with the City and the Agency. (b) Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board may be called in accordance with the provisions of Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California. (c) Call, Notice and Conduct of Meetings. All meetings of the Board, including without limitation, regular, adjourned regular and special meetings, shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act of the Government Code of the State of California. Section 2.05. Actions Taken. The Secretary shall cause to be kept records, consistent with City policy, of all actions taken by the Board at all meetings of the Board and shall, as soon as possible after each meeting, make such records available for inspection by each Director and the Members. Section 2.06. Voting. Each Director shall have one vote. -3- Section 2.07. Quorum; Required Votes; Approvals. Directors holding a majority of the votes shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that less than a quorum may adjourn from time to time. The affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be required to take any action by the Board. Section 2.08. Bylaws. The Board may adopt, from time to time, such bylaws, rules and regulations for the conduct of its meetings as the Board may deem necessary or advisable for the purposes hereof. ARTICLE III OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Section 3.01. Chairperson, Executive Director and Secretary. The City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby designated as the Executive Director and Secretary, respectively, of the Authority. The Board shall select a Chairperson from among its members who shall serve as Chairperson until such person is no longer a.City Councilmember or a new Chairperson is appointed by the Board. The officers shall perform the duties normal to said offices. The Chairperson or the Executive Director (or any other person authorized by resolution of the Board) shall sign contracts on behalf of the Authority, and the Chairperson shall perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board. The Executive Director shall administer the day- to-day affairs of the Authority and shall execute the policies and directives of the Board. The Secretary shall countersign all contracts signed by the Chairperson or the Executive Director on behalf of the Authority (unless otherwise specified by resolution of the Board), perform such other duties as may be imposed by the Board and cause a notice of this Agreement to be filed with the Secretary of State pursuant to the Act. Section 3.02. Treasurer and Auditor. Pursuant to Section 6505.6 of the Act, the City Treasurer is hereby designated as the Treasurer of the Authority and the City Finance Director is hereby designated as the Auditor of the Authority. The Treasurer shall be the depositary, shall have custody of all of the accounts, funds and money of the Authority from whatever source, shall have the duties and obligations set forth in Sections 6505 and 6505.5 of the Act and shall assure that there shall be strict accountability of all funds and reporting of all receipts and disbursements of the Authority. As provided in Section 6505 and Section 6505.6 of the Act, the Auditor shall make arrangements with a certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants for the annual audit of accounts and records of the Authority, which audit may be combined with any audit of the accounts and records of the City, the Agency and/or any Public Agency. The Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to prepare or cause to be prepared such audits and reports as required pursuant to Section 6505 of the Act and by order of the Board. Section 3.03. Officers in Charge of Records, Funds and Accounts. Pursuant to Section 6505.1 of the Act, the Treasurer shall have charge of, handle and have access to all accounts, funds and money of the Authority and all records of the Authority relating thereto; and the Secretary shall have charge of, handle and have access to all other records of the Authority. Section 3.04. Bondin.q Persons Havin.q Access to Authority Records. From time to time, the Board may designate persons, in addition to the Executive Director, the Secretary, the Treasurer and the Auditor, having charge of, handling or having access to any records, funds or accounts or any Public Improvement of the Authority, and the respective amounts of the official bonds of the Executive Director, the Secretary, the Treasurer and the Auditor and such other persons pursuant to Section 6505.1 of the Act. Section 3.06. Le.qal Advisor. The City Attorney shall act as the legal advisor of the Authority, and shall perform such duties as may be prescribed by the Board. Section 3.06. Other Employees. The Board shall have the power by resolution to appoint and employ such other consultants and independent contractors as may be necessary for the purposes of this Agreement. All of the privileges and immunities from liability, exemption from laws, ordinances and rules, all pension, relief, disability, workers' compensation and other benefits which apply to the activities of officers, agents, or employees of a public agency when performing their respective functions shall apply to the officers, agents or employees of the Authority to the same degree and extent while engaged in the performance of any of the functions and other duties of such officers, agents or employees under this Agreement. None of the officers, agents, or employees directly employed by the Board shall be deemed, by reason of their employment by the Board to be employed by the City or the Agency or, by reason of their employment by the Board, to be subject to any of the requirements of the City or the Agency. Section 3.07. Assistant Officers. The Board may by resolution appoint such assistants to act in the place of the Secretary or other officers of the Authority (other than any Director), and may by resolution provide for the appointment of additional officers of the Authority who may or may not be Directors, as the Board shall from time to time deem appropriate. ARTICLE IV POWERS Section 4.01. General Powers. The Authority shall exercise the powers granted to it under the Act, including but not limited to the powers set forth in the Bond Law and the powers of each of the Members as may be necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 4.04. As provided in the Act, the Authority shall be a public entity separate from the City, the Agency, any Associate Member and any other Public Agency. Section 4.02. Power to Issue Bonds. The Authority shall have all of the powers provided in the Act and in the Bond Law, including the power to issue Bonds thereunder. Section 4.03. Specific Powers. The Authority is hereby authorized, in its own name, to do all acts necessary for the exercise of the foregoing powers, including but not limited to, any or all of the following: -5- (a) to make and enter into contracts; (b) to employ agents or employees; (c) to acquire, construct, manage, maintain or operate any Public Improvement, including the common power of the City, the Agency and any Associate Member to acquire any Public Improvement by the power of eminent domain or any other lawful means; (d) to sue and be sued in its own name; (e) to issue Bonds and otherwise to incur debts, liabilities or obligations; provided, however, that no such Bond, debt, liability or obligation shall constitute a debt, liability or obligation of the City, the Agency, any Associate Member or any other Public Agency; (f) to apply for, accept, receive and disburse grants, loans and other assistance from any agency of the United States of America or of the State of California; (g) to invest any money in the treasury pursuant to Section 6505.5 of the Act which is not required for the immediate necessities of the Authority, as the Authority determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the Government Code of the State of California; (h) to apply for letters of credit or other form of financial guarantees in order to secure the repayment of Bonds and enter into agreements in connection therewith; (i) to carry out and enforce all the provisions of this Agreement; (j) to make and enter into Bond Purchase Agreements and any other agreements, assignments and documents of any nature whatsoever as may be necessary or convenient in the exercise of its powers hereunder or under the Act; (k) to purchase Obligations of or to make loans to the City, the Agency, any Associate Member or any other Public Agency for the purposes hereof, or to refinance indebtedness incurred by the City, the Agency, any Associate Member or any other Public Agency in connection with any of the purposes hereof; (I) to establish community facilities districts under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended; and (m) to exercise any and all other powers as may be provided in the Act or in the Bond Law. Section 4.04. Restrictions on Exercise of Powers. The powers of the Authority shall be exercised in the manner provided in the Act and in the Bond Law, and, except for those powers set forth in the Bond Law, shall be subject (in accordance with Section 6509 of the Act) to the restrictions upon the manner of exercising such powers that are imposed upon the Agency in the exercise of similar powers. -6- Section 4.05. Obli.qations of Authority. The debts, liabilities and obligations of the Authority shall not be the debts, liabilities and obligations of the City, the Agency, any Associate Member or any other Public Agency. Section 4.06. Non-Liability for Obli,qations of Authority. No Member, Associate Member, Director, officer, agent or employee of the Authority shall be individually or personally liable for the payment of the principal of or premium or interest on any obligations of the Authority or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of any obligations of the Authority; but nothing herein contained shall relieve any such Member, Associate Member, Director, officer, agent or employee from the performance of any official duty provided by law or by the instruments authorizing the issuance of any obligations of the Authority. ARTICLE V CONTRIBUTIONS; ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS; FUNDS Section 5.0t. Contributions. The Members may in the appropriate circumstance when required hereunder: (a) make contributions from their treasuries for the purposes set forth herein, (b) make payments of public funds to defray the cost of such purposes, (c) make advances of public funds for such purposes, such advances to be repaid as provided herein, or (d) use its personnel, equipment or property in lieu of other contributions or advances. The provisions of Government Code Section 6513 are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. Section 5.02. Accounts and Reports. To the extent not covered by the duties assigned to a trustee chosen by the Authority, the Treasurer shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice or by any provision of any trust agreement entered into with respect to the proceeds of any Bonds issued by the Authority. The books and records of the Authority in the hands of a trustee or the Treasurer shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by representatives of the Members. Within 180 days after the close of each Fiscal Year an annual report of all financial activities for such Fiscal Year shall be presented to the Members, to the extent such activities are not covered by the report of such trustee. The trustee appointed under any indenture or trust agreement shall establish suitable funds, furnish financial reports and provide suitable accounting procedures to carry out the provisions of said trust agreement. Said trustee may be given such duties in said indenture or trust agreement as may be desirable to carry out this Agreement. Section 5.03. Funds. Subject to the applicable provisions of any instrument or agreement which the Authority may enter into, which may provide for a trustee to receive, have custody of and disburse Authority funds, the Treasurer of the Authority shall receive, have custody of and disburse Authority funds as nearly as possible in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, and shall make the disbursements required by this Agreement or to carry out any of the provisions or purposes of this Agreement. Section 5.04. Annual Budget and Administrative Expenses. The Board may adopt a budget for administrative expenses, which shall include all expenses not included in any financing issue of the Authority, on or about July 1st of each year. The estimated annual administrative expenses of the Authority shall be allocated in such budget by the Authority to the Members in such proportion as the Board shall determine. -7- ARTICLE VI TERM Section 6.01. Term. This Agreement shall become effective, and the Authority shall come into existence, on the date of execution and delivery hereof, and this Agreement and the Authority shall thereafter continue in full force and effect for at least forty (40) years (unless earlier terminated by the Members and any then Associate Members), but in any event so long as either (a) any Bonds remaining outstanding or any material contracts to which the Authority is a party remain in effect, or (b) the Authority shall own any interest in any Public Improvements or land. Section 6.02. Disposition of Assets. Upon termination of this Agreement, all property of the Authority, both real and personal, shall be conveyed to the City; provided that any surplus money on hand shall be returned to the Members and any Associate Members in proportion to the contributions, if any, that they have made (or, if none of them have made any contributions, to the City. ARTICLE VII ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENTS Section 7.01. Power to Enter Into Associate Membership Agreements. In addition to those powers specified in this Agreement, the Authority shall have the power to enter into Associate Membership Agreements with any city, county or city and county located in California upon the approval thereof by the Board. Section 7.02. Contents of Associate Membership Agreements. Each Associate Membership Agreement shall: (a) State that the prospective Associate Member is an associate member of the Authority; (b) Specify that the purpose of the Associate Membership Agreement is to facilitate the financing or refinancing of public improvements located within the jurisdiction of the applicable Associate Member; (c) Restrict the powers of the prospective Associate Member with respect to the Authority to those enumerated in this Article VII; (d) Specify that the prospective Associate Member shall not have the power vote on any action to be taken by the Authority and no officer, councilmember, boardmember or employee of the Associate Member shall become an officer of the Authority or a Director; and (e) Specify the fees, if any, to be charged the prospective Associate Member for its participation in financings of the Authority. -8- Section 7.03. Approval of Associate Membership Agreements. In determining whether to approve an Associate Membership Agreement with a prospective Associate Member, the Directors may take into account any criteria deemed appropriate to the Directors, including but not limited to the financial viability of the project within the jurisdiction of the Associate Member proposed to be served by the public improvements to be financed. ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 8.0'1. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sufficient if delivered to the notice address of each party hereto for legal notices or as otherwise provided by a party hereto in writing to each of the other parties hereto. Section 8.02. Section Headings. All section headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing the language in the section referred to or to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. Section 8.03. Consent. Whenever in this Agreement any consent or approval is required, the same shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 8.04. Law Governin.q. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, and is to be so construed. Section 8.05. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time, or from time to time, except as limited by contract with the owners of Bonds issued by the Authority or by applicable regulations or laws of any jurisdiction having authority, by one or more supplemental agreements executed by both of the parties to this Agreement either as required in order to carry out any of the provisions of this Agreement or for any other purpose, including without limitation addition of new parties (including any legal entities or taxing areas heretofore or hereafter created) in pursuance of the purposes of this Agreement. Section 8.06. Enforcement by Authority. The Authority is hereby authorized to take any or all legal or equitable actions, including but not limited to injunction and specific performance, necessary or permitted by law to enforce this Agreement. Section 8.07. Severabilit¥. Should any part, term or provision of this Agreement be decided by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby. Section 8.08. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the City or the Agency, respectively. Neither the City nor the Agency may assign any right or obligation hereunder without the written consent of the other. -9- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized and their official seals to be hereto affixed, on the day and year set opposite the name of each of the parties. CITY OF TEMECULA Date: April 24, 2001 By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Date: April 24, 2001 By: Chairperson ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -10- ITEM 2 CITY A'I-rORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA REDVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Agency Board/Executive Director John Meyer, Redevelopment Director.~/-~[ April 24, 2001 Old Town Community Theater Schematic Design and Master Site Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency Board: l. Approve the Old Town Community Theater Schematic Design and Master Site Plan. 2. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Provide direction to proceed with design development and construction drawings. BACKGROUND: On June 13, 2000, the Redevelopment Agency entered into a professional service agreement with, Fisher Merfiman Sehgal Yanez, Inc. (the architects) for design services of the Old Town Community Theater. The architects have worked diligently with the Agency's Ad Hoc Theater Committee comprised of Mayor Comerchero and Council Member Pratt, as well as, the Theater Advisory Committee, which is made up of representatives from the Old Town Local Review Board, Mount San Jacinto Community College, The Theater Foundation and City Staff. ANALYSIS: The architects have conducted in-depth stakeholder interviews and community workshops to determine the needs of the potential users of the theater. Upon conclusion of the interviews, the architects presented the programming results to the Ad Hoc Theater committee. W~th direction from that committee, the architects completed the schematic design and master site planning for the Theater. The Master Plan provides for approximately 18,000 square feet of theater and auxiliary space. The facility offers a 316-seat theater, a full 80' x 35' stage, with a 40' wide proscenium (stage opening), a 20-musician orchestra pit, private and group dressing rooms, a scene shop and dance studio. Restroom facilities and a concession stand ara located in an adjacent courtyard. The Mercantile building is being retrofitted and is proposed to include the box office and gallery/performance space. A solid overhang/canopy is proposed along the west side of the Mercantile building and around the R:\Oldtown\Temecula Playhouse~heatermasterplan final.cc.dec courtyard to provide covered access between the Mercantile Building and the Theater. The final determination of the Mercantile and the location of the restrooms will be resolved during the design development stage of the project. The architects have done an excellent job on the schematic building designs. The facility's massing has been broken up into smaller components. This has created proportions with a human scale that allows the large facility to blend into its Old Town setting. The architectural style of the facility can be described as Old West, relying on bam and silo-style elements, with wood siding and a metal roof to meet the design requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. The schematic design and master site plan have been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Theater Advisory Committee, the Old Town Local Review Board and the Community Services Commission. The Community Theater, as proposed, is a very comprehensive facility that will meet the various needs of local live performance groups. The Ad Hoc Committee acknowledged the breadth of the proposed facility when determining the direction of the schematic diagrams. The theater, as proposed, will exceed the $2.5 million dollar budget included in the current CIP budget. Staff and the Ad Hoc Committee asked the architect to analyze what elements of the theater would need to be scaled back to remain within the $2.5 million dollar budget. The architect believes to remain within the current budget they would have to eliminate the orchestra pit, dance studio, scene shop and reduce the size of the dressing rooms. During the Theater Advisory Committee's review of the master plan, two additional features have been proposed. First is the addition of two classrooms over the dressing rooms. Mount San Jacinto Community College has demonstrated a strong interest in using the facility for its drama and performing arts curriculum. The 1,200 sq. f. of classrooms would facilitate not only the community college, but also allow several existing and future Community Service Department programs. The second item to be added was the inclusion of the four private balconies. Although the balconies add only 16-24 additional seats, they are seen as an opportunity to provide an added sense of intimacy. They can also be a significant source of both capital and on-going revenue through sponsorships. The Ad Hoc committee supports the inclusion of both these items. It is recommended they be included in the construction drawings, but considered an additive bid item. The Theater Foundation has raised approximately $500,000 to date. The Foundation has already contributed $37,500 for half of the cost of the architectural services and has retained the services of a grant writer to pursue the centdbution of grant dollars to the theater. The Community Theater has also been included on the list of projects forwarded to our representatives for consideration of federal funding. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Planning Department conducted an environmental review of the project as Environmental Assessment No. 79. A copy of the Initial Environmental Study is contained in Attachment A. To mitigate potential impacts, Staff has identified a number of mitigation measures that if implemented, are expected to mitigate the impacts of this project to a level of insignificance. A copy of the draft Mitigation Monitoring Program is contained in Attachment A. The Proposed Notice of the City's Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was distributed for public review and comment from March 7, 2001 to March 27, 2001. Comments ware received from the Army Corp of Engineers and the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service. Both Agencies provided boilerplate comments which will be addressed through design and development phase of the project. As a result, staff recommends that the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and implemented as part of this approval. R:\Oldtown\Ternecula Playhouse~theatermasterplan final.cc.doc FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost to complete the design and construct the "base" option of the project is $4.75 million dollars. The base option includes administrative and contingency costs, f'Lxtures, flooring and equipment costs and the design of the balconies and classrooms. The addition of the balconies and classroom space will raise the budget another $750,000, for a total of $5.5 million. This project is included in the Capital Improvement Program in fund 210-190-167-5800. The project is cunrently funded with approximately $1.15 million from RDA funds and $1 million in contributions from the Theater Foundation. Therefore, an additional contribution of $2.6 to $3.35 million will need to be identified during the upcoming ClP process. ATTACHMENTS: A. Environmental Study Mitigation Monitoring Program B. Schematic Architectural Drawings R:~:)ldtown\Temecula Playhouse~heatermasteq~an final.cc.doc ATTACHMENT A 1. Environmental Study 2. Mitigation Monitoring Program City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration PROJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Old Town Community Theater (Environmental Assessment No. 79) Temecula Redevelopment Agency North of Main Street, West of Old Town Front Street in the Old Town area, in the City of Temecula The conceptual design and eventual construction ofa 19,600 sq. fi. performing arts theatre consisting of a 300+ seat dance hall, classrooms, workshop, storage classrooms and restrooms on a parcel containing .97 acres. An existing building of 2,173 sq. fi. historic structure is will be incorporated as part of the proposed performing arts theatre complex The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for this project on March 27, 2001. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached to this Notice and will be included as part of the Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is March 7, 2001 to March 27, 2001. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 43200 Business Park Drive. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through: _ The Local Newspaper. ~X Posting the Site. __ Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact David Hogan, Senior Planner at (909) 694-6400. Prepared by:(Signamre)'~L"~e'-~ ~~ ~>~VID I~c~:~ (Name and Title) ' R:\EA\EA79\NOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.doc 1 City of Temecula Planning Department Agency Distribution List PROJECT: Old Town Community Theater (Environmental Assessment No. 79) DISTRIBUTION DATE: March 7, 2001 CASE PLANNER: Patty Anders CITY OF TEMECULA: Building & Safety ................................ ( ) Fire Department .................................. ( ) Police Department ................................ ( ) Parks & Recreation (TCSD) .................... ( ) Planning, Advance ............................... ( ) Public Works ...................................... ( ) STATE: Caltrans ............................................ ( ) Fish & Game ..................................... (X) Mines & Geology ................................ ( ) Regional Water Quality Control Bd .......... (X) State Clearinghouse .............................. ( ) State Clearinghouse (10 Copies) ............... ( ) Water Resources .................................. ( ) ........... () FEDERAL: Army Corps of Engineers ...................... (X) Fish and Wildlife Service ...................... (X) Federal Emergency Management Agency... (X) ............ () REGIONAL: Air Quality Management District .............. ( ) Western Riverside COG ........................ ( ) R:\EA\EA79\NOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.doc 2 CITY OF MURRIETA: Planning ............................................ RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Airport Land Use Commission ................ ) Engineer ........................................... ) Flood Control ..................................... (X) Health Department ............................... (X) Parks and Recreation ............................ ( ) Planning Department ............................ ( ) Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) .... ( ) Riverside Transit Agency ....................... ( ) .......... () UTILITY: Eastern Municipal Water District ............. (X) Inland Valley Cablevision ...................... (X) Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve ...... (X) Southern California Gas ........................ (X) Southern California Edison ..................... (X) Temecula Valley School District .............. ( ) Metropolitan Water District .................... ( ) OTHER: Pechanga Indian Reservation ...................( ) Eastern Information Center ..................... ( ) Local Agency Formation Corem .............. ( ) RCTC ............................................. ( ) Homeowners' Association ...................... ( ) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Old Town Community Theater (Environmental Assessment No. 79) Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number David Hogan, Senior Planner 909) 694-6400 Project Location North of Main Street, West of Old Town Front Street in the Old Town area Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency General Plan Designation Community Commercial Zoning Specific Plan No. 5 (Old Town) - Tourist Retail Core Planning Area Description of Project The conceptual design and eventual construction of a 19,600 sq. ft. performing arts theatre consisting of a 300+ seat dance hall, classrooms, workshop, storage classrooms and restrooms on a parcel containing .97 acres. An existing building of 2,173 sq. ft. historic structure is will be incorporated as part of the proposed performing arts theatre complex. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The property is within the heart of Old Town Temecula which is made up of a variety of antique and retail business, restaurants and some office professional uses. A portion of the property is adjacent to the Murrieta Creek. Other public agencies whose approval County Department of Environmental Health, County is required Flood Control and Water Conservation District Regional Water Quality Control Board, Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts, Southern California Gas Company, Southern California Edison Company, General Telephone Company, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project could be located within a floodway and/or floodplain for Murrieta Creek and will require FEMA review and approval. R:\EA',EA79\EA.doc 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving. at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agricultural Resources Population and Housing X Noise Air Quality Population and Housing X Biological Resources, Water Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation X Geologic Problems X Transportation/Traffic Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems X Hydrology and Water Quality X Land Use Planning None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared × find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. i find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning Printed name R:~F_.A~EA79\EA.doc 2 March 1, 2001 Date City of Temecula 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supp~ang inf~,,,,=,:o,~ Sources Impact Incorporated Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual X character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or X nighttime views in the area? Comments: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The project will not affect a scenic vista. The project is not located in an area where there is a scenic vista. A portion of the site is adjacent to the Murrieta Creek and will be designed in accordance with the Old Town Specific Plan design guidelines. The proposed project will be conditioned to submit a detailed site plan, grading plan, floor plans, elevations, color and material boards and landscape plans to ensure architectural compatibility with the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore, with mitigation measures, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact. There is an existing historic building on site. Minor, if any, modification will be done to the existing historic building. The performing arts theatre has been designed to incorporate this structure, with its historic significance, into the overall design of the project. As a consequence, no significant impact to scenic resources will result from the proposed project, but will preserve the historic building on site. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The majority of the subject site is vacant. The proposed conceptual project has been designed to comply with the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan design standards and will enhance the visual character and quality of the surrounding area. The project will be conditioned to submit a detailed site plan, grading plan, elevations, color and material board and landscape plans prior to final design approval and issuance of a building permit to ensure visual quality and compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan. The conceptual design also appears to require City Council approval to allow an increase to the maximum height requirement of the Old Town Specific Plan. Pursuant to Chapter III, section 8. (b.) Height Limitations, the City Council may approve an increase to a building height. The increased height is requested to accommodate the "fly tower" portion of the theatre which is needed to accommodate the props and performances. The fly tower, as proposed in the conceptual design, has been integrated so that the increase in height is appropriately integrated into the overall conceptual design. Therefore, with mitigation measures, the project will not have a significant adverse impact. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The project will produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new light sources. All R:\EA~A79\EA.doc 3 light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with City Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With this mitigation measure in place, less than significant impacts are anticipated. 2. Agricultural Resources. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model ('1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant WithLess Than Significant Impact Mitigation Significant No Impact issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, X or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with the existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: 28.-c. No Impact. The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the historic past has not been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. Therefore, there is no significant impact related to this issue. 3. AiR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant WithLess Than Significant Impact Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of X the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? R:\EA~EA79~EA.doc 4 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant WithLess Than Significant Impact Mitigation Significant No Iml3act Issues and Supporting Information Sources' Incorporated Impact C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net X increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a X sub~tnntial number of people? Comments: Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will comply with State and National ambient air quality standards and will comply with the air quality management policies in the current Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and emissions thresholds established in South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook (April 1993). The City of Temecula's General Plan EIR has addressed development of Old Town and proposed adequate mitigation for any impacts. Therefore, no significant impacts related to conflicts with air quality plans will result from the proposed project 3.b-c. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will be consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook (April 1993) and does not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Moreover, the proposed project does not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The City of Temecula General Plan EIR that addresses the impacts to air quality and pollutants and has provided mitigation measures for any potential impacts. Therefore, because this project is consistent with the General Plan, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact. The proposed project will not expose sensitive receptom to pollutants. There are no significant pollutants in proximity to the project nor is it anticipated that the project will generate pollutants due to the proposed use. The project shall comply with the environmental and development standards as detailed in the Old Town Specific Plan for civic development. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 5 3.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project may create objectionable odors during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be or short duration and are not considered significant over the long term. The project shall comply with the mitigation measures while construction; therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant impact Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources incorporated impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either X directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any X riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional ~lans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally X ~rotected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. interfere substantially with the movement of X any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances X protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural X Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: 4.a-e Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The General Plan indicated that a portion of the project site may be proposed for an area containing a Riparian Forest which is considered a sensitive habitat site. A detailed site plan, grading plan, elevations and landscape plan will be submitted and reviewed by all appropriate City and outside environmental agencies prior to project approval and issuance of any permits. No development or disturbance will be permitted to any portion of Murrieta Creek. With R:\EA\EA79'~.A.doc appropriate mitigation measures, and conditions of approval, the proposed project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact, Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is located within the fee area for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan. However, being a governmental agency, the City is exempt from payment of the SKR fee. The City does, however, coordinate and contribute with the County of Riverside with the ongoing mitigation of the SKR by the collection of fees that are sent to the County. Therefore, the project with have a less than significant impact is anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potectially Significant WithLess Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact incorporated Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57 b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the X significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57 c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 5.a-d. Less Than Significant Impact. The General Plan EIR diagram of Areas of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources (Figure 5-6) and Paleontological area (Figure 5-7) does identify the property as a sensitive archaeological and paleontological site, although the text of the General Plan EIR recognizes that the survey leading the identification of sensitive sites may not accurately portray all cultural resources in the study area. Therefore, the project will be required to have a cultural resource specialist on site during grading. With mitigation measures is place, less than significant impact is anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Impact Mitigation Significant NO Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated impact a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo X Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the.area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? R:\EA\EA79'~-A.doc 7 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? Less Than Poten'~ial~¥ Signific~! With Less Than Significant impactMitigation Significant No impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated Impact Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including X liquefaction? iv) Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss X of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is X unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in X Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or properly? e. Have soil incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Comments: 6.a-d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is located in Southern California, an area that is seismically active. There may be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground shaking, ground failure, soil erosion, liquefaction, subsidence or unstable or expansive soil conditions. According to Figure 7-2 of the General Plan, the subject site is located in the Subsidence/Liquefaction Harzards Area. The General Plan indicates that this area is in Groundshaking Zone II. The proposed project will be required to submit detailed, site plan, grading plan, elevations, etc., prior to the approval and issuance of any permits. In addition, a soils/geologic report wilt be required to determine if expansive soils or fault hazards exists and provide appropriate mitigation measures. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction, consistent with the California Building Code standards. Further, the proposed project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and require that all recommendations contained in this report are complied with during construction. The soil reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. Moreover, erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the proposed project at the site. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of proper compaction of the soils and landscaping. With appropriate mitigation measures, and conditions of approval, the proposed project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 8 No Impact. Septic sewage disposal systems are not proposed for this project. The ultimate development of the site will be required to hook up to the existing public sewer system; therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~.~.ct Mitigation Impact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or X the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or X the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, X substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a X list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land X use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private X airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically X interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant X risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 9 Comments: 7.a.,b. No Impact. The proposed project does not propose to utilize and store hazardous materials. The project will be required to submit a detailed site plan, grading, floor plan, elevations, etc. Prior to the project being approved and any permits issued, the project will be reviewed by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the Fire Department. Any recommendations or requirements will be incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project. Therefore, with appropriate review and approval of the project, not significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within ¼ of an existing or proposed school. The nearest school site is over two miles away. No impact is anticipated. No Impact. The proposed project site is not nor is it located near a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.e.,[. No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airstrip. The nearest airport is French Valley, whose runway is approximately 5 miles to the east. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal. No Impact. The project will take access from maintained public streets and will therefore not impede emergency response or evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact. The project will not result in an ~ncrease to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush, grass, or trees. The project is on a partially developed lot with an existing historic structure with surrounding retail and commercial uses. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No impacts are anticipated. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~act Irlcorporated Impact a. Violate any water quality standards or waste X discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or X interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? R:\EA\EA79\EA.dOc 10 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Signi fic~t Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern X of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern X of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water, which would X exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard X area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place structures within a 100-year flood hazard X area which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk X of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By. complying with the NPDES requirements, any. potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. With mitigation, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 8.b.f. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or R:\EA\EA79\EA. doc 11 8.c.d. 8.g-h. excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters or aquifer volume. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation and/or flooding on- or off-site. Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff that is created. The proposed project would have no impact on the existing storm drain facilities. Any drainage into Murrieta Creek will have to be approved by the Riverside County Flood Control District. With conditions of approval placed on the project, a less than significant impact is associated with this project. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is not anticipated to create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A detailed site plan and grading plan will be submitted and reviewed to ensure that the capacity and storm water drainage systems will not be adversely effected. The proposed project will be conditioned to accommodate the drainage created as a result of the development of the subject site and not impact surrounding properties. With conditions of approval placed on the project, a less than significant impact is associated with this project. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project may expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is located within the limits of the 100-year (Zone AE) floodplain/floodway as delineated on Panel No. 060742 000lB (dated November 26, 1996) of the FEMA FiRMaps, and as a result, is subject to severe flood hazard from Murrieta Creek. The project is also located partially within the dam inundation area identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Potential flood impacts will be mitigated by requiring the followiNG hydrology study; a grading plan that plots floodway and floodplain with elevations called out; require the finished floor to be at least 1' above the FEMA Base Flood Elevation; require the project to obtain a Foodplain Development Permit or if it is determined that the property is located within the FEMA floodway, require a FEMA letter of map revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of a grading permit and condition the project to pay area drainage plan fees to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. With mitigation measures and conditions of approval, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. No Impact. The proposed project site will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. There is no dam or levee near the surrounding subject site that would result in such damage. The project site is not subject to inundation by sieche, tsunami, or mudflow as these events are not known to happen in this region. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 12 9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact a. Physically divide an established X community? b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, X policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: No Impact. The proposed project is the conceptual design and construction of a 19,600 sq. ft. performing arts theatre consisting of a 300+ seat dance hall, classrooms, workshop, storage classrooms and restrooms on a parcel containing .97 acres. The existing building of 2,173 sq. ft. will be incorporated as part of the proposed performing arts theatre. There is no established residential community on the site nor in the vicinity. Therefore, no impacts as a result of this project are anticipated. No Impact, The proposed project will probably be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan, Development Code and City's General Plan Land Use Designation of CC (Community Commercial) and the zoning designation of TRC (Tourist Retail Core) which allows for the development of a performing art theatre. Typical uses include retail, commercial and limited professional offices uses. The proposed project will be conditioned to submit a detailed site plan, grading plan, floor plans, elevations, color and material boards and landscape plans. The proposed conceptual design is consistent with the design intent of the Old Town Specific Plan. All impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. The adopted land uses did not have an adverse environmental impact. As a result, the project is not anticipated to conflict with existing land uses. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project is located within the fee area for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan. All development within this fee area is required to pay a mitigation fee. This project will be required to pay a mitigation fee for the SKR. With this measure in place, the project is anticipated to have less than significant impacts. R:\EA\EA79\EA,doc 13 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Sigr~ ficant With Significant NO impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~t Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known X mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- X important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 10.a.b. No Impact. The proposed project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources or in the loss of an available, locally important mineral resource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified the City of Temecula a classification of MRZ-3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits, which have the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, it has been determined that this area contains no deposits of significant economic value based upon available data in a report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165, prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: Less Than PotentiallySignificant With Less Than SignificantMitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~r,pact Incorporated Impact a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of X excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e. For a project located within an airport land use X plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? R:\EA~EA79\EA.doc 14 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~mp~o~ Inco,porated imp,ct f. For a project within the vicinity of a private X airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 11 .a., d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project may expose people to severe noise levels during the developmentJconstruction phase (short term). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and not long- term. Construction hours are regulated by the City Development Code, to which the applicant shall comply. Therefore noise as a result of construction will not be considered significant. With appropriate mitigation measures, and conditions of approval, the proposed project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 11 .b,c. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed performing arts theatre will not have activities that would expose persons to or generate excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels due to the required construction techniques that the project will be conditioned to have. It is anticipated that the theatre will attract small musical groups and local plays and the noise will be mitigated by the required method of construction. The proposed theatre will be conditioned to have a Sound Transmission Control (STC) rating of 55-60 decibels to comply with the noise standards of the General Plan and ensure that there will not be an increase in the ambient noise level in the project vicinity. The exterior wall and roof ceiling assembly will be conditioned to have an STC rating of 55-60 decibels to mitigate any potential impact to noise. Therefore, with standard construction requirements as mitigation measures, and conditions of approval, the proposed project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 11 .e.f. No Impact. The proposed project is not within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, therefore, future performers, employees and guests of the theatre will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport. Consequently no impact is anticipated as a result of this project. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 15 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No )mpac[ Issues and Supporting information Sources impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, X either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing X housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of CC (Community Commercial) and Zoning Designation of TRC (Tourist Retail Core). The proposed performing arts theatre is not likely to cause people to relocate to, or within the Temecula area, but is anticipated to serve the local cultural and musical needs of the existing and surrounding communities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12.b.c. No Impact. The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing as the site is vacant property zoned TRC (Tourist Retail Core) which does not permit residential development. The project will neither displace housing or people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse X physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire protection? X R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 16 13. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Mitigation Impact C. Police protection? Incorporated X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public facilities? X Comments: 13.a.,b.,c.,e. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some services. However, the City has an ongoing comprehensive parks and recreation program that mitigates any incremental affect this project may create. 13.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 13.f. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered public facilities. When a formal application is submitted, the project will be routed to all applicable outside agencies for their review and conditioning. It is anticipated that the outside agencies will have no objections, and will provide "Will Serve" letters indicating services will be provided to this project. Therefore, with standard routing and review of the project to outside agencies, a less than significant impact is anticipated. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant WithLess Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,.p.ct Incorporated Impact a. Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 17 Comments: 14.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The project may have a slight impact on the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks in that people attending the theatre may in Town may be more inclined to use the existing recreational facilities once they are in Old Town. The proposed performing arts theatre would also meet local demand for this type of facility. As a result, no significant impacts are expected to occur. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~mpac~ incorporated impact a. Cause an increase in traffic, which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a X level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, X including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or X programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? Comments: 15.a,b. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will be conditioned to provide a traffic analysis prior to project approval to ensure Level of Services are maintained at a General Plan acceptable level of service for traffic circulation within the City of Temecula. In addition, the proposed project will be conditioned to provide a statement of operations and a parking analysis so that an adequate analysis can be conducted and any identified impacts mitigated. With mitigation measures in place as necessary, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 15.c.d. No Impact. The proposed development of this property will not result in a change in air traffic patterns by increasing the traffic levels in the vicinity. The site is not within the French Valley Airport's flight overlay district. The conceptual design of the project will not pose a R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 18 threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the people utilizing the roads in the vicinity of the project because there are no sharp curves or dangerous intersections proposed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The preposed project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The preposed project will be required to submit a detail site plan, grading plan, floor plan and landscape plan. The project will be reviewed and conditioned to ensure compliance with current City standards and adequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.f. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated.. The preposed development complies with the Old Town Specific Plan parking requirements for uses within the Tourist Retail Core. However, the standard is no on-site parking requirement in the Tourist Retail Core. The conceptual site design is providing approximately twenty four (24) parking spaces on site and anticipates utilizing the two adjacent parking lots of an office building and the future City's children museum, These parking spaces will be available as the uses are primarily off-peak hours; therefore, it is anticipated that these spaces will be available for the proposed theatre. In addition, there is street parking throughout Old Town and existing parking lots that will be utilized. Therefore, with the mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.g. No Impact. As conceptually designed, the preposed project does not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. There are existing bus routes servicing the Old Town area that patrons can utilize to access the theatre. Therefore, no impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~mpac~ Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements X of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new X water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion X of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envirenmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to X serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? R:\EA\EA79~.A.doc 19 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~.~p~ct Mitigation Impact Incorporated e. Result in a determination by the wastewater X treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 16.a.,b., e. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The proposed conceptual project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.c. No Impact. The proposed project will not require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and will not cause significant environmental effects. The existing facilities have capacity to handle the proposed project, as the result will only be an incremental effect upon existing systems. All appropriate environmental agencies and any necessary clearances will be required prior to the approval or issuance of any permits. Consequently, construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities are not anticipated. 16.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Moreover, it is anticipated that the outside agencies will have no objections, and will provide "Will Serve" letters indicating services will be provided to this project. Since the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 20 16.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waster created by this future development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Less Than T Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife X population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively X considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? c. Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: 17.a. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. A portion of the site is adjacent to Murrieta Creek. The actual limits of the property line relative to the creek are undetermined at this time. Therefore, the proposed project will be required to submit a hydrology study and detailed plans (grading, site plan, elevations, floor plans, landscaping and a color and material board). The project will be conditioned so that no development or damage of any kind will occur to Murrieta Creek. As part of the review process (prior to approval and permit issuances), all appropriate environmental agencies and all necessary clearances will be required to ensure no adverse effects on the environment will occur. With mitigation measures in place, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment on site or in the vicinity of the project or will not substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife with all the necessary environmental clearances required. Therefore, with mitigation measures, a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 21 17.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited or cumulatively considerable. The potential cumulative impacts for the proposed project with regards to drainage, traffic, air quality, noise, traffic, aesthetics and service systems will be conditioned and mitigated to comply with the General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Development Code and Uniform Building Code requirements. In all aspects, the proposed development will be required to be consistent with the aforementioned documents and requirements, and as such, impacts generated by the future proposed development will be no greater than what was anticipated at build-out as analyzed in the General Plan. 17.c. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project was analyzed with regards to noise, hazards and geologic events. In all aspects, the proposed project will be designed and conditioned to reduce impacts with specific mitigation measures. With these measures in place, less than significant impacts are anticipated. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to incorporate all mitigation measures imposed on this project. The Mitigation monitoring Program accompanies this document. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they ara available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 18.a. The City's General Plan and Final Environment Impact Report were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study. The General Plan EIR was also referenced in the adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan. 18.b. 18.c. There were no earlier impacts which affected this project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared for this project and is attached to this document. 2. 3. 4. 5. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Old Town Temecula Specific Plan South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The City of Temecula Development Code. R:\EA\EA79\EA.doc 22 Proposed Mitigation Monitoring Program Planning Application No. EA-079 (Conceptual Community Theatre in Old Town) AESTHETICS, LAND USE, AND PLANNING General Impact: Degrade the existing visual impact or quality of the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Ensure architectural compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan. Submit a detailed, dimensioned site plans, grading plans, elevations, floor plans, color and material board, landscape plans and signage for the proposed theatre to the Planning Department for review, analysis and approval. Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Receive detailed plan approval prior to the submittal of an application or plans for a grading or building permit. Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Degrade the existing visual impact or quality of the site and the surrounding area by exceeding the Old Town Specific Plan height limitations. Ensure the fly tower which exceeds the height requirement is appropriately integrated into the overall site design and is compatible with the architectural guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan. Submit a detailed site plan, grading plan, elevations, floor plan, color and material board for the proposed theatre to the Planning Department for review. Once the application is complete, this item will be scheduled for the Planning Commission and City Council's approval to increase the height to the fly tower. Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare which would affect Palomar Observatory and day or night time views. Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance Ne. 655. Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building & Safety Department. R:\EA\EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program,doc 1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES General Impact: Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulation or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service or federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) Mitigation Measure: Receive written clearance from all applicable outside environmental agencies (California Department of Fish and Game, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Water Quality Control Board, etc.). Specific Process: Route project information to all applicable outside environmental agencies. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works and Planning Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands (as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) Receive wdtten clearance from all applicable outside environmental agencies (California Department of Fish and Game, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Water Quality Control Board, etc.). Route project information to all applicable outside environmental agencies Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works and Planning Department. CULTURAL RESOURCES General Impact: Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological or archaeological resources. Mitigation Measure: Require a professional cultural resources specialist is present on site during grading. Specific Process: Condition the project for on site monitoring during grading. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department R:\EA\EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS General Impact: Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. Expose people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake hazards. Mitigation Measure: Condition the proposed project to utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the California Building Code. Specific Process: Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Department for approval. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department General Impact: General Impact: Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake hazards. Mitigation Measure: Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards. Specific Process: A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Department. General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. Planting of slopes consistent with Development Code. Submit erosion control plans to the Department of Public Works for approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works. R:\EA\EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 3 General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development Cede. Submit landscape plans that include planting of any slopes to the Planning Department for approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Planning Department. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY General Impact: Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity). Mitigation Measure: An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Specific Process: Filing of a Notice of Intent from NPDES or the project is shown to be exempt and submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).. General Impact: The project will result in changes to.absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff. Mitigation Measure: Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading plans. Specific Process: Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for approval. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works R:\EA~EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 4 General Impact: Alter the existing drainage pattern of the site that would result in the erosion or siltation on- or off-site, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flood on- or off-site or place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area that would impede or redirect flood flows. Mitigation Measure: Determine if the project is within the floodplain or floodway and obtain either a floodplain development permit, or If the property is located within the floodway, obtain a FEMA letter of map revision (LOMR). Ensure the proposed project does not adversely impact surrounding properties and receive approval from Riverside County Flood Control District prior to draining into Murrieta Creek. Specific Process: Submit a grading plan and hydrological study and a grading plan that calls out elevations of the floodway and floodplain which has been approved by FEMA, Riverside County Flood Control and Public Works. Elevate the finished floor 1' above the FEMA Base Flood Elevation. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works and Riverside County Flood Control District. General Impact: Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding. Mitigation Measure: Make a fair share contribution toward regional flood control facilities. Specific Process: Payment of area drainage plan fees to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of grading permits. Responsible Monitoring Party: Department of Public Works R:\EA~EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 5 NOISE General Impact: Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of the General Plan standards or a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Or, a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Mitigation Measure: Construction only during approved days and hours of operation. Specific Process: Ensure construction only during approved days and hours of operation through periodic monitoring and contractor's commitment to comply with City standards. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of building permits. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department General Impact: Exposure of people to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels or a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Mitigation Measure: The building shall have a Sound Transmission Control (STC) rating of 55-60 decibels to comply with the General Plan noise standards. Specific Process: Submit construction plans that have the exterior wall and roof ceiling assembly that complies with the STC rating of 55-60 decibels. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of building permits. Responsible Monitoring Party: Building Department TRAFFIC General Impact: Cause an increase in traffic to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. Mitigation Measure: Ensure levels of service are maintained at General Plan acceptable levels. Specific Process: Prepare and submit a traffic and parking analysis. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department R:\EA'~EA79\Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 6 Genera~ Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Result in inadequate parking capacity. Ensure adequate parking is provided on-site and nearby within reasonable walking distances. Submit a parking analysis that includes a statement of operations with days and hours of operation, Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Planning Department General Impact: Result in inadequate parking capacity. Mitigation Measure: Ensure adequate parking is provided on-site and nearby within reasonable walking distances. Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Submit a joint use parking agreement with the two adjacent existing parking lots to help mitigate off-site parking impacts, Prior to the submittal of an application for a grading or building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department R:\EA\EA79\Draff Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 7 ATTACHMENT B Schematic Architectural Drawings 1. Site Plan 2. Elevations 3. Sections 4. Perspectives ~-~ RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY A']-FORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Redevelopment Director April 24, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of April 24, 2001 for the Redevelopment Department. First Time Homebuyers Proflram Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000. Residential Improvement Proflrams The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $181,576 has been funded. Affordable HousinR Two projects have been submitted for preliminary review. One project is from the Agency's development partner, the other from a property owner who is also interested in developing affordable housing. Staff is analyzing these proposals. Senior HousinR Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior housing. A senior housing demand study is being conducted. Old Town Community Theater The architect, Fisher Merriman Sehgal and Yanez Inc., has conducted stakeholder and community interviews and has completed the schematic phase of the project. The Community Theater Advisory Committee reviewed preliminary floor plans and elevations on January 22, 2000. The Old Town Local Review Board and Community Services Commission recommended approval of the master plan for the Theater at their February 12, 2000 meetings. The City Council reviewed the conceptual plan at its April 24 meeting. R:~SYERSK~VJONTH LLY~report.apr01 .doc Old Town Trading Post Agency staff is handling the acquisition and relocation of tenants of the Trading Post property. Escrow closed on August 25, 2000. Facade Irnprovement/Non-Conformin.q Sign Pro.qram The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · Rooster Creek Crossing Signs Rhythem & Brews Signs · The Health Insurance Agency Signs · The Old Tin Box Signs The following facade improvements are underway: · M & M Art and Frame Signs · Waves of Beauty Signs · Y's & O's Signs Old Town Promotions/Marketing Western Days was held on April 7 and 8 and featured 3 bands, trail horee packing demonstrations, roping, western skits and gunfighter competitions, gold panning, woodcarving exhibits, pony rides and a Civil War re-enactment. The Agency is also sponsoring several other events over the next few months. The events include Dixieland Jazz Festival scheduled for May 12 and 13 featuring 3-4 bands daily on two stages; and the Street Painting Festival scheduled for June 2 & 3 featuring numerous artists displaying their chalk art on the streets of Old Town. R:~SYERSK~IONTHLLY~'eport.aprO 1 .doc TEMECULA FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVA~,~. ~--~- City Attorney ~7.¢_x~ Director of Fina~~ TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT Temecula Public Financing Authority Executive Director, Shawn D. Nelson April 24, 2001 Administrative Matters and Initial Actions Relating to Formation of Community Facilities District RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Authority, by minute order, appoint a Chairperson from among its Board of Directors. 2. That the Authority adopt the resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ADOPTING LOCAL GOALS AND POLICIES FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF PETITIONS TO FORM A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO BACKGROUND: Ashby Development Company, Inc. and Calloway 220, LLC (collectively, the "Developers") have requested that a community facilities district be formed to assist in the financing of public improvements in the Roripaugh Ranch area. The City and the Redevelopment Agency created the Authority, by execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement, to provide an independent governmental entity that could consider the proposed financing and act as the issuer of any bonds. The Authority, being newly created, must first appoint a Chairperson from among its members. The Authority must then adopt a resolution as to certain administrative matters, such as meetings and rules for proceedings of the Authority. The resolution provides for compensation to Boardmembers in the amount of $100.00 for each meeting of the authority that they attend, with a maximum of $200.00 per month for each Boardmember. The Authority will then consider the adoption of two resolutions related to the formation of a community facilities district. The CFD will only include land owned or controlled by landowners who desire to participate in the financing program. The Developers have requested that the CFD issue bonds to finance the public improvements so that development of the land can proceed. The Developers have agreed to pay all City and Authority costs related to the proposed CFD formation and bond issue, and have submitted petitions and a deposit/reimbursement agreement with respect thereto. The bonds would be payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the CFD and collected by the Authority. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to continue the process, begun by the City and the Redevelopment Agency by creating the Authority, to consider the formation of the community facilities district and the issuance of the bonds, the following actions must occur: The Authority, by minute order, should select a Chairperson from among its members. The Authority will consider the adoption of a resolution regarding its meetings, a seal, and establishing rules for its proceedings. The Authority will then consider adoption of a resolution approving local goals and policies for its Mello-Roos districts, which must be adopted under State law prior to the formation of a community facilities district. The Authority will then consider adoption of a resolution accepting the Developers' deposits, approving a deposit/reimbursement agreement with the City and the Developers and engaging professionals to assist the City and the Authority in forming the CFD and issuing bonds of the Authority for the CFD. FISCAL IMPACT: The Developers have agreed to pay all out of pocket expenses incurred relative to the proposed financing. Costs of issuance of the proposed bond issue will be paid from the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the Authority. All annual costs of administering the bond issued will be paid by special taxes levied on the properties in the community facilities district. The bonds will not be obligations of the City or the Redevelopment Agency, but will be limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the community facilities district. The procedural resolution of the Authority provides for compensation to Authority Boardmembers in the amount of $100.00 per Authority meeting that they attend, with a maximum of $200.00 in any month. Said amounts are expected to be paid initially from administrative levies on land in the community facilities district, and otherwise from monies derived by the Authority from its activities. Attachments: Resolutions (3) Local Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ADOPTING LOCAL GOALS AND POLICIES FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS WHEREAS, Section 53312.7(a) of the California Government Code requires that the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") consider and adopt local goals and policies for community facilities districts ("CFDs") prior to the initiation of proceedings by the Authority to establish a CFD under the provisions of Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors intends to consider the establishment of a CFD related to the financing of public improvements in the Roripaugh Ranch area, and desires at this time to adopt local goals and policies for CFDs so that it may commence proceedings for establishing a community facilities district to finance public improvements in such area; and WHEREAS, Authority staff has caused to be prepared a draft of goals and policies for CFDs of the Authority (the "Goals and Policies"), the form of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of Directors has duly considered said Goals and Policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority that the Goals and Policies, in the form on file with the Secretary, are hereby adopted as the local goals and policies of the Authority for CFDs, and are intended to meet the requirements of Section 53312.7(a) of the Act. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Ternecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 24th day of April, 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperso~ ATTEST: R:/ResosTP FA2001/Resos01-02 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 01-02 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 24th day of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 5 BOARDMEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero NOES: 0 BOARDMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARDMEMBERS: None Susan ~. Jones, CML; Auth~tary/City Clerk R:/ResosTPFA2001/Resos01-02 2 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 0t- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") have adopted resolutions authorizing the formation of a joint powers authority under Articles 1-4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to be known as the "Temecula Public Financing Authority" (the "Authority"), and the execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the City and the Agency have executed said agreement and the Authority, being duly formed, now desires to take certain actions relative to its administration as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. Meetings. A. Regular meetings of the Authority shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the months at 7:00 p.m., and may be combined with meetings of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula. The Authority shall be required to hold at least one meeting annually on the second Tuesday of July on each year, or the date of the first City Council meeting in the month of July each year, whichever occurs latter. B. Noticing of regular, special or adjourned meetings of the Authority, posting of agendas, public comments to the Authority Board, closed sessions, and other procedural matters affecting meetings of the Authority shall be governed by the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Brown Act"). Section 2. Meetinq Place. All meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at the regular meeting place of the City Council of the City, unless the Board of Directors shall adjourn to or fix another place of meeting in a notice to be given thereof, or unless prevented by flood, fire or other disaster. Said regular meeting place is hereby fixed and established at the City Council Chambers, Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Section 3. Rules of Proceedin,qs. A. Public Meetings. All meetings of the Authority shall be open to the public, unless a closed session is held as permitted by provisions of the Brown Act. B. Meeting Procedures. Unless otherwise specified by this Resolution, all proceedings of the meetings of the Authority shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act and the ordinances, resolutions or written policies governing the conduct of meetings of the City Council of the City of Temecula. C. Quorum. Three (3) of the members of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Section 4. Contracts; A,qreements. All contracts or agreements on behalf of the Authority shall be signed by the Chairperson or the Executive Director, and countersigned by the Secretary, after having been authorized to do so by action of the Board of Directors, unless otherwise specifically provided by resolution of the Board of Directors. Any contract or agreement involving less than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) may be executed by any of such officers without the need for any approval by the Board of Directors. Section 5. Seal. The Authority shall have an Official Seal consisting of two (2) concentric circles with the words "Temecula Public Financing Authority" within the outer circle and the date of formation of the Authority within the inner circle. The Secretary shall obtain the Seal at the Authority's expense and shall have custody of the Seal. Section 6. Secretary of State. Bond Counsel to the Authority is hereby directed to file a notice of the formation of the Authority with the Secretary of State of the State of California, as required by Sections 6503.5 and 53051 of the California Government Code. Section 7. Office and Mailinq Address. The office of the Authority and its official mailing address are hereby fixed and established at Temecula Public Financing Authority c/o City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589, Attention: Executive Director. Section 8. Conflict of Interest Code. The Conflict of Interest Code of the City is hereby adopted as the Conflict of Interest Code for the Authority. Section 9. Compensation to Boardmembers. Compensation for members of the Board of Directors is hereby established at one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each meeting attended by a member of the Board of Directors. The maximum compensation per month for each member shall be two hundred dollars ($200.00). Compensation shall be paid as of the date of the first meeting of the Authority. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 24th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Acting Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 01- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 24th day of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Authority Secmta~/City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF PETITIONS TO FORM A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO WHEREAS, Ashby Development Company, Inc. and Calloway 220, LLC (collectively, the "Developers") have submitted to the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") Petitions (Including Waivers) (the "Petitions") requesting that the Board of Directors conduct proceedings under Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Act") to create a community facilities district to be designated "Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 01-1 (Butterfield Stage Road)" (the "CFD"); and WHEREAS, the Developers have also submitted checks in the amounts referred to in the Petitions (the "Deposit") and a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the "Agreement"), among the Developers, the City of Temecula and the Authority, and this Board of Directors now desires to accept the Petitions, authorize the execution and delivery by the Authority of the Agreement, employ certain consultants necessary for the formation of the CFD and the sale of bonds of the Authority for the CFD, and authorize and direct Authority staff to take actions necessary to present to this Board of Directors for approval the documents necessary to form the CFD and issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. Receipt by the Authority of the Petitions and the Deposit are hereby acknowledged. The Director of Finance of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and directed to accept the Deposit, and to use the Deposit in the manner contemplated by the Agreement. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the Authority, and to take all actions necessary, in his discretion, to implement the Agreement. Section 2. City staff, acting for and on behalf of the Authority, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to present to the Board of Directors for its review and approval all proceedings necessary to create the CFD and issue bonds of the Authority therefore. The passage of this Resolution shall in no way obligate this Board of Directors to form the CFD or issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD. Section 3. The firm of Stone & Youngberg LLC is hereby designated as underwriter to the Authority for any bonds to be issued for the CFD. Section 4. The firm of David Taussig and Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as Special Tax Consultant to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Fieldman Rolapp & Associates is hereby designated as financial advisor to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Quint & Thimmig LLP, is hereby designated as Bond Counsel to the Authority for the CFD, and the firm of McFarlin & Anderson is hereby designated as Disclosure Counsel to the Authority for the CFD. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute agreements with said firms for their services in connection with the CFD, in form and substance acceptable to the Executive Director. The fees and expenses of such consultants shall be payable solely from the Deposit and/or the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the Authority for the CFD. Section $. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to engage an appraiser to appraise the property subject to the special taxes to be levied within the CFD, and a market absorption consultant to analyze the proposed development in the CFD, on such terms as are acceptable to the Executive Director. The fees and expenses of such consultants shall be payable solely from the Deposit and /or the proceeds of bonds, if any, issued by the Authority for the CFD. Section 6. The Executive Director, Treasurer, Secretary, legal counsel to the Authority and all other officers and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 24th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 01- was duly adopted at a the 24t~regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on day of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 01-1 (Butterfield Stage Road) THIS DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is by and among the City of Temecula (the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for itself and on behalf of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 01-1 (Butterfield Stage Road) (the "CFD"), Ashby Development Company, Inc. ("Ashby") and Calloway 220, LLC ("Calloway" and, together with Ashby, the "Developers). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Developers have requested that the Authority consider the issuance of bonds for the CFD (the "Bonds") under Sections 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the Developers are willing to deposit funds with the Authority to ensure payment of the costs of the Authority and the City in forming the Authority and otherwise in connection with the issuance of bonds for the CFD and the proposed expenditure of the proceeds thereof, provided that such funds so advanced are reimbursed to the Developers from the proceeds of any bonds issued by the Authority for the CFD to the extent provided herein; and WHEREAS, the Authority and the Developers now desire to specify the terms of said deposit and reimbursement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. The Deposit: Additional Advances. Ashby has provided to the City $113,500 and Calloway had provided to the City $18,500 (collectively, the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay the costs in conducting proceedings for the issuance of bonds for the CFD (as more fully described in Section 2(a) below, the "Initial Costs"), said amounts having been heretofore delivered by the Developers to the Finance Director of the City by means of checks made payable to the "City of Temecula." The City, by its execution hereof, acknowledges receipt by the City of the Deposit. The checks representing the Deposit have been cashed by the City, and the Deposit may be commingled with other funds of the City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the City shall at all times maintain records as to the expenditure of the Deposit. The Developers hereby agree to advance any additional amounts necessary to pay any Initial Costs incurred by the City or the Authority, in excess of the amount of the Deposit, promptly upon written demand therefore by the Finance Director of the City; provided that (a) Ashby shall contribute 86% of any such additional amounts requested and Calioway shall contribute 14% of any such additional amounts so requested; and (b) the amount of the Deposit, plus any such additional amounts (the "Additional Deposits" and, collectively with the Deposit, the "Deposits"), shall not exceed $200,000 without the prior written consent of the Developers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Manager may direct City and Authority staff and consultants to cease all work related to the issuance of the Bonds and/or the formation of the Authority and the CFD until any additional amounts so demanded has been received by the City. Section 2. Use of Funds. The Deposits shall be administered as follows: (a) The Finance Director of the City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to pay the Initial Costs, including but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of any consultants to the City or the Authority employed in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the proposed expenditure of the proceeds thereof (such as engineering, legal counsel, including the City Attorney, Bond Counsel and financing and special tax consultants); (ii) the costs of appraisals, market absorption and feasibility studies and other reports necessary or deemed advisable by City staff or consultants in connection with the Bonds; (iii) costs of publication of notices, preparation and mailing of ballots and other costs related to any election with respect to the CFD, the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to be levied therein and any bonded indebtedness thereof; (iv) a reasonable charge for City staff time, as determined by the City Manager in his sole discretion, in analyzing the CFD, the Bonds and the expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto; and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City or the Authority with respect to the CFD or the Bonds after the date of execution of this Agreement. The Developers hereby acknowledge that, at a minimum, the following amounts will or may be charged against the Deposits, whether or not the CFD is formed and the Bonds are issued: (i) up to $30,000.00 to David Taussig and Associates, Inc., special tax consultant, (ii) up to $30,000.00 to an appraiser, (iii) up to $12,000.00 to Richards, Watson & Gershon, City Attorney and general counsel to the Authority, (iv) up to $15,000.00 for a market absorption analysis related to the CFD, (v) up to $20,000.00 to Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates for financial advisory services, and (vi) up to $25,000.00 to the City for City Staff time in analyzing the CFD, the Bonds and the expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto, including all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City. (b) If the Bonds are issued under the Act by the Authority secured by special taxes levied upon the land within the CFD, the Authority shall provide for reimbursement to the Developers, without interest, of all amounts charged against the Deposits, said reimbursement to be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act. On or within ten (10) business days after the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the Finance Director of the City shall return the then unexpended Deposits to the Developers, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above, but have not yet been so paid. (¢) If the Bonds are not issued, the Finance Director of the City shall, within ten (10) business days after adoption of the resolution stating the intent of the Authority to terminate proceedings under the Act with respect to the issuance of the Bonds, return the then unexpended Deposits to the Developers, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above but have not yet been so paid. (d) The Deposits shall be charged, and reimbursements and/or returns of unexpended funds shall be allocated, 86% to Ashby and 14% to Calloway. Section 3. Reimbursement of Other Developer Costs. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit reimbursement of other costs and expenses of the Developers or any successor in interest thereto with respect to the land in the CFD incurred in connection with the CFD from the proceeds of the Bonds, including, but not limited to fees and expenses of legal counsel to the Developers and/or their successors in interest and special consultant expenses. Any such reimbursement shall be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act and otherwise provided for, at the reasonable discretion of the Authority, in the proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds. Section 4. A,qreement Not Debt or Liability of City or Authority. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that this Agreement is not a debt or liability of the City or the Authority, as provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act. Neither the City nor the Authority shall in any event be liable hereunder other than to return the unexpended and uncommitted portions of the Deposits as provided in Section 2 above and provide an accounting under Section 7 below. Neither the City nor the Authority shall be obligated to advance any of their own funds with respect to the CFD or for any of the other purposes listed in Section 2(a) hereof. No member of the City Council, the Board of Directors of the Authority or officer, employee or agent of the City or the Authority shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder. Section $. No Obligation to Issue Bonds. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the City or the Authority to issue any bonds, or to expend any of their own funds in connection with the CFD. Section 6. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 7. Accounting. The City Finance Director shall provide the Developers with a written accounting of moneys expended under this Agreement, within ten (10) business days of receipt by the Finance Director of the City of a written request therefore submitted by an authorized officer of a Developer. No more than one accounting will be provided in any calendar month and the cost of providing the accounting shall be charged to the Deposits. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Section 9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. -3- IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature line below. Executed on: April __, 2001 DEVELOPERS: ASHBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. By: Its: Executed on: April __, 2001 CALLOWAY 220, LLC By: Its: Executed on: April __, 2001 CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA By: City Manager Executed on: April __, 2001 AUTHORITY: TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, for itself and on behalf of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District 01-1 (Butterfield Stage Road) By: Executive Director TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LOCAL GOALS AND POLICIES FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS (adopted April 24, 2001) I. INTRODUCTION. Section 53312.7(a) of the California Government Code requires that the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") consider and adopt local goals and policies concerning the use of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act"), prior to the initiation of proceedings to establish a new community facilities district ("CFD") under the Act. The following goals and policies are intended to meet the minimum requirements of the Act, and may be amended or supplemented by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority at any time. II. GOALS. The Authority will consider the use of the Act for financing public facilities and services, and refinancing existing liens levied or bonds issued to finance public facilities, only in connection with the prospective development of land in the City of Temecula (the "City"), or as otherwise referenced in an owner participation or development agreement to which the City or the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula is a party. Any request for a CFD which is not integral to the development of land will require amendment of these goals and policies, and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. All Authority and noncontingent consultant costs incurred in the evaluation and establishment of new CFDs will be paid by the proponents of the CFD. The Authority shall use all reasonable efforts not incur any expense for processing a CFD which are not eligible to be reimbursed from CFD bond proceeds. Expenses incurred by the Authority that are not chargeable to the CFD shall be borne by the proponent of the CFD. Ill. ELIGIBLE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES. The improvements eligible to be financed by a CFD must be owned by a public agency or public utility, and must have a useful life of at least five (5) years, except that up to five percent of the proceeds of an issue may be used for facilities owned and operated by a privately owned public utility. The improvements must be consistent with any relevant specific plan approvals. A CFD shall not vest any rights to future land use on any properties, including those which are responsible for paying special taxes. The list of public facilities eligible to be financed by a CFD include, but are not limited to, the following: · Freeway Off ramps · Street Improvements · Street lighting · Traffic signals and safety lighting · Landscaping in public right-of-ways · Governmental facilities · Sanitary sewer facilities · Storm drain facilities · Flood control facilities · Potable and reclaimed water facilities · Convention Center · Utility relocations · Elementary and secondary school sites and facilities Libraries Public utilities Police and fire protection facilities Public parking structures Cultural facilities Child care facilities Parks and recreational facilities The funding of public facilities to be owned and operated by public agencies other than the Authority or the City shall be considered on a case-by-case basis. If the proposed facilities are appropriate for financing by a CFD and are consistent with approved land use plans for the property, the Authority may consider entering into a joint community facilities agreement in order to finance these facilities. A joint agreement with the public agency that will own and operate any such facility must be entered into prior to the adoption of the resolution of formation relating to the formation of any CFD, except as otherwise permitted under the Act. The Authority will consider on a case-by-case basis CFDs established for the provisions of services eligible to be funded under the Act. Eligible services are as specified in the Act. IV. PRIORITIES FOR CFD FINANCING. Priority for CFD financing shall be given to public facilities which are necessary for development. V. CREDIT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CFD BOND ISSUES. All CFD bond issues should have at least a three to one property value to public lien ratio after calculating the value of the financed public improvements to be installed and any private improvements for which financing is reasonably assured, unless the Board of Directors of the Authority finds and determines that the proposed bonds do not present any unusual credit risk or, by a four-fifths vote, that the proposed bond issue should proceed for specified public policy reasons. Property value may be based on either an appraisal or on assessed values as indicated on the county assessor's tax roll. Any appraiser shall be selected by the Authority (or the City on behalf of the Authority), and the appraisal shall be based on standards determined applicable by Authority staff and consultants. The appraisal must be dated within six months of the date the bonds are issued. The public lien amount shall include the bond issue currently being sold plus any public indebtedness secured by a fixed lien on real property currently existing against the properties to be taxed. A reserve fund equal to the lesser of (i) ten percent of the original proceeds of the bond issue, (ii) the maximum annual debt service on the bonds, or (iii) one hundred twenty-five percent of the average annual debt service on the bonds is considered as appropriate for any bond issue where less than seventy-five percent of the buildable acreage has been developed. A smaller reserve fund may be appropriate for bond issues in CFDs where over seventy-five percent of the buildable acreage has been developed. The reserve fund may be maintained by or on behalf of a public financing authority, if such an authority purchases the CFD bonds, and need not be held under the fiscal agent agreement pursuant to which the CFD bonds are issued. Less than a three to one property value to public lien ratio, excessive tax delinquencies, or projects of poor economic viability may cause the Authority to disallow the sale of bonds or require credit enhancement prior to bond sale. -2- If the Authority requires letters of credit or other security in connection with the issuance of bonds for a CFD, the credit enhancement shall be issued by an institution, in a form and upon terms and conditions satisfactory to the Authority. Any security required to be provided may be discharged by the Authority upon the opinion of a qualified appraiser, retained by the Authority, that a value-to-lien ratio of three to one has been attained. As an alternative to providing other security, a portion of the bond proceeds may be placed in escrow with a corporate agent in an amount sufficient to assure a value-to-lien ratio of at least three to one on the outstanding proceeds, or other appropriate release requirements. VI. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS. PROPERTY A. Disclosure Requirements for Developers. Developers who are selling lots or parcels that are within a CFD shall provide disclosure notice to prospective purchasers that comply with all of the requirements of Section 53341.5 of the Government Code. The disclosure notice must be provided to prospective purchasers of property at or prior to the time the contract or deposit receipt for the purchase of property is executed. Developers shall keep an executed copy of each disclosure document as evidence that disclosure has been provided to all purchasers of property within a CFD. B. Disclosure Requirements for the Resale of Lots. The Treasurer of the Authority shall provide a notice of special taxes to sellers of property (other than developers) which will enable them to comply with their notice requirements under Section 1102.6 of the Civil Code. This notice shall be provided by the Treasurer of the Authority within five working days of receiving a written request for the notice, unless otherwise permitted under the Act. A reasonable fee may be charged for providing the notice, not to exceed any maximum fee specified in the Act. VII. EQUITY OF SPECIAL TAX FORMULAS AND MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAXES. Special tax formulas for CFDs shall provide for minimum special tax levels which satisfy the following expenses of a CFD: (a) 110 pement gross debt service coverage for all CFD bonded indebtedness, (b) the projected administrative expenses of the CFD, and (c) amounts equal to the differences between expected earnings on any escrow fund and the interest payments due on bonds of the CFD. Additionally, the special tax formula may provide for the following: (a) any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve fund established in association with the indebtedness of the CFD, (b) the accumulation of funds reasonably required for future debt service, (c) amounts equal to projected delinquencies of special tax payments, (d) the costs of remarketing, credit enhancement and liquidity facility fees, (e) the cost of acquisition, construction, furnishing or equipping of facilities, (f) lease payments for existing or future facilities, (g) costs associated with the release of funds from an escrow account, and (h) any other costs or payments permitted by the Act and applicable law. The special tax formula shall be reasonable and equitable in allocating public facilities' costs to parcels within the CFD, unless otherwise agreed to by at least a majority of the property owners to be subject to the special tax. Exemptions from the special tax may be given to parcels which are publicly owned, are held by a property owners' association, are used for a public purpose such as open space or wetlands, are affected by public utility easements making impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easements, or have insufficient value to support bonded indebtedness. -3- The total projected property tax levels for any CFD shall not exceed any maximum specified in the Act. The annual increase, if any, in the maximum special tax for any parcel shall not exceed any maximum specified in the Act. The increase in the special tax levied on any parcel as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel shall not exceed any maximum specified in the Act. The Authority (or the City on behalf of the Authority) shall retain a special tax consultant to prepare a report which: (a) recommends a special tax for the proposed CFD, and (b) evaluates the special tax proposed to determine its ability to adequately fund identified public facilities, Authority administrative costs, services (if applicable) and other related expenditures. Such analysis shall also address the resulting aggregate tax burden of all proposed special taxes plus existing special taxes, ad valorem taxes and assessments on the properties within the CFD. VIII. APPRAISALS. The definitions, standards and assumptions to be used for appraisals shall be determined by Authority staff on a case-by-case basis, with input from Authority consultants and CFD proponents, and by reference to relevant materials and information promulgated by the State of California. In any event, the value-to-lien ratio shall be determined based upon an appraisal by an independent MAI appraiser of the proposed CFD. The appraisal shall be coordinated by and under the direction of the Authority (or the City on behalf of the Authority). All costs associated with the preparation of the appraisal report shall be paid by the proponents of the CFD through an advance deposit mechanism. The Authority shall have discretion to retain a consultant to prepare a report to verify market absorption assumptions and projected sales prices of the properties which may be subject to the maximum special tax in the CFD. IX. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BONDS. All terms and conditions of any CFD bonded indebtedness shall be established by the Authority, after consultation with the Authority's consultants, City staff and the proponents of the CFD. The Authority will control, manage and invest, or cause to be controlled, managed and invested, all CFD bond proceeds. Each bond issue shall be structured so as to minimize any impact on the bonding capacity or any credit rating of the Authority or the City. All statements and material related to the sale of bonds shall emphasize and state that neither the faith, nor general credit of the Authority or the City is pledged to security or repayment of the bonds. The sole source of pledged revenues to repay CFD bonds shall be the special taxes, bond proceeds and reserve funds held under the bond document, and the proceeds of foreclosure proceedings and additional security instruments provided at the time of bond issuance, unless otherwise specifically agreed to in writing by the Authority. X. CFD INITIAL COSTS. All Authority and consultant costs incurred in the evaluation of CFD applications and the establishment of CFDs will be paid by the proponents of the CFD by advance deposit increments. The Authority shall use reasonable efforts not to incur any non- reimbursable expenses for processing and administering CFDs. In general, expenses not chargeable to the CFD shall be directly borne by the proponents of the CFD. Xl. USE OF CONSULTANTS. The Authority (or the City on behalf of the Authority) shall select all consultants necessary for the formation of the CFD and the issuance of bonds, including the underwriter(s), bond counsel, financial advisors, appraiser, market absorption study consultant and the special tax consultant. Prior consent of any proponent of a CFD shall not be required in the determination by the Authority of the consulting and financing team. Xll. EXCEPTIONS TO THESE POLICIES. The Authority may find that a waiver of any of the above stated policies is reasonable given identified Authority benefits to be derived from such waiver. Such waivers only will be granted by action of the Board of Directors of the Authority. -5- ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY A'I-rORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~:=: CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager¢~~'~ April 24, 2001 Discussion of 1999 Draft Traffic Study PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Draft 1999 Traffic Study. That the City Council provide direction to staff concerning the BACKGROUND: In February 2001, Council member Mike Naggar requested that staff agendize the 1999 Traffic Study. As a result, staff has prepared this Agenda Report to bring the traffic study forward to the Council for consideration. The purposes of this traffic study were to evaluate the function of the proposed Circulation Plan and provide the information needed to prepare the environmental document for the City's adoption of a revised Circulation Element. The City entered into a contract with Wilbur Smith and Associates in March of 1998. The Council appointed an advisory committee composed of a Council member, a Planning and Traffic Safety Commissioners, and Staff from both the City's of Murrieta and Temecula. After many months of work on the process, a draft Circulation Plan was informally reviewed by the Planning and Traffic Safety Commissions at a joint workshop. At the time the contract was originally award to Wilbur Smith Associates, the county had not yet announced the Riverside County Integrated Plan process. Throughout this process, the Committee and staff worked with the consultant to prepare an updated Circulation Element that would minimize future traffic and congestion problems. Once the alternate circulation plans were developed, a detailed traffic study was prepared to document the impacts of the existing Land Use Plan on the proposed road circulation network. However, as the traffic study proceeded, the problems with ever intensifying land use changes in the County's unincorporated areas became obvious. It was felt that the County needed to finalize their Integrated Plan (RCIP) to provide a more consistent basis for the traffic modeling effort. When the Growth Management Action Plan was adopted by the Council in March of 2000, the Council concurred that the Circulation Element should be updated as part of the Comprehensive General Plan Update. Funding was included in the 2000/2001 operating budget to undertake a comprehensive General Plan Update, including an amendment to the Circulation Element. The City has signed a contract with Cotton Bridges Associates to provide planning services to the City to update the General Plan. This contract includes funding for a traffic study to reflect the revised City Land Use Plan as well as the projected land uses in the unincorporated areas through the RClP. R:\GENPLAN\98 Circ Element UPdate\1999 Draft Circulation Plan.doc 1 If the Council directs staff to bring the Interim Circulation Element Update forward for the Council's consideration, staff will need time to finalize the Draft Circulation Element report and recommendations, review the proposed traffic study, and finalize the necessary environmental document. All of these items will require a formal recommendation from the Planning Commission prior to the City Council's consideration. An updated Circulation Element is expected to be revised again by the Comprehensive General Plan Update process that has just started. The reactivation of the Interim Circulation Element Update would need several months to bring to the Planning Commission and would cause some delays to the ongoing Comprehensive Plan Update process. Given the Council's current direction, staff recommends that the current Comprehensive General Plan Update process proceed, including the proposed Circulation Element amendment, to address circulation issues in conjunction with this effort. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R:~GENPLAN\98 Circ Element UPdate\1999 Draft Circulation Plan.doc 2 ITEM 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager April 24, 2001 Proposed Eastern Urban Limit Line PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a map titled "Proposed Eastern Urban Limit Line" BACKGROUND: On March 27, 2001 the City Council directed staff to prepare a map depicting an urban limit line on the easterly side of the City of Temecula. This map has been created in response to comments made by Supervisor Buster during the March 20, 2001 Board of Supervisors public hearing for the Morgan Hill Specific Plan No. 313. Supervisor Buster was supportive of the creation of an urban limit line and pledged to take the matter up with the Board of Supervisors for consideration after the City Council adopted an urban limit line map. An urban limit line is an officially adopted and mapped line that separates an urban area from its surrounding open lands including farms, watersheds, and other open space land uses for a set period of time. An urban limit line is a pro-active growth management tool that seeks to control, direct or phase growth in order to promote more compact, contiguous urban development. The impact of establishing an urban limit line include using public facilities more efficiently thereby saving taxpayers money, affirming the City of Temecula's identity by assuring that it does not merge with nearby County development; protecting the Temecula wineries, watershed, and wildlife habitat. An urban limit line has the added benefit of offering more certainty about which lands can and cannot be developed; and encouraging long-term strategic thinking about Temeoula's future. FISCAL IMPACT: Potentially millions of dollars due to savings on unnecessary infrastructure and public services costs. ATTACHMENTS: A map entitled "Proposed Eastern Urban Limit Line" Large Scale County Map ATTN:P:\PLANNING\WIMBERVG\SP 313 urban limit line staffrpt cc,doc 1 ITEM 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN.C~,IE CiTY MANAGER ~/]..// TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manage~'~- April 24, 2001 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Processing Schedule RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Provide direction to staff BACKGROUND: This item was placed on the agenda by the Council action at the April 10t" meeting. At the meeting, the applicant, Richard Ashby, requested that the process be expedited for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. The City Council directed the Roripaugh Ranch Subcommittee consisting of Mayor Comerchero and Mayor Pro-Tem Ron Roberts to meet and discuss the request. However, the meeting could not be scheduled in time to meet the staff report deadline. Consequently, an oral report will be provided to the Council on this matter. FISCALIMPACT: None. R:\THORNHG~.oripaugh Rch Schedule.doc ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~x~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager Howard Windsor, Acting Fire Chief April 24, 2001 Selection of City Council Representative to Serve on Design Team for the Wolf Creek Fire Station RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council select one member to serve on the design team for the Wolf Creek Fire Station. BACKGROUND: During a recent City Council meeting, Councilmember Jeff Stone expressed an interest in having a City Council representative serve on the design team for the Wolf Creek Fire Station. In the past, whenever the City has designed and built public facilities, we have assembled a design team that consists of representatives from various City departments. This team selects the architects and ensures that the facility will best meet the communities needs. In regards to this fire station, the floor plan has already been identified with the County's standard heavy urban fire station layout identified to best meet the fire departments needs. The County also has an architectural firm on contract that has designed and built several of these stations throughout the County. This will not only save the City money, but will also make committee's task much simpler because the committee will only need to focus on ensuring that the station design fits with the surrounding community. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. R.'IYA TESGIWOLF CREEK FIRE STATION COUNCIL SUB COMMITTEE. DOC 1 4/18/01 ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager~,,,~ April 24, 2001 Authorization to file letter of protest with the California Public Utilities Commission regarding the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project (Application Number: A. 01-03-036) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the City Attorney to file a letter of protest with the California Public Utilities Commission regarding the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project as proposed by the San Diego Gas and Electric Company. BACKGROUND: The San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) has filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the proposed Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project. According to the Commission's rules, any party wishing to file a protest or response to this application must do so by May 2, 2001. This project would construct a 500 Kilovolt (500 KV) Transmission Line from the Romoland area on Menifee Road to the Rainbow area in northern San Diego County. The project would also provide a new substation in the Rainbow area and upgrade power substation facilities owned by Southern California Edison at the Romoland location as well as related system upgrades. The proposed route would traverse the wine country east of Temecula and also cross through portions of Terneeula in the Wolf Creek area. SDG&E has indicated an "environmentally preferred" alignment that would avoid the Wolf Creek area, but would traverse the easterly and southerly portions of the Pechanga Indian Reservation. Because of the sovereign status of the Pechanga Tribe, the preferred alignment would require the permission of the Pechangas. If this project were ultimately approved by the PUC, other portions of the alignment could be acquired by SDG&E through eminent domain if property negotiations were not successful. Attached is a copy of the "Notice of Application" for this project which provides further information, as well as a map showing the proposed project alignment. In addition, SDG&E has prepared a "Proponent's Environmental Assessment" consisting of four volumes. Copies R:IOGRADYJISDGE TRANSMISSION LINE - COUNCIL REPORT DA TED APRIL 24, 2001.DOC 1 4/I 7/01 of these documents are available at City Hall, as well as other locations in Temecula and along the proposed alignment. DISCUSSION: This is a significant project, both for SDG&E and for the region. The project application states that the Project will "allow maximum utilization of and access to existing and planned generating resources in California, thus enhancing statewide reliability and a competitive regional market". While the need for remedies to our current electrical crisis is clear, the role of this project in addressing these needs is not so clear. The project was originally proposed as a method to bring additional power to the San Diego region, due to a lack of generating capacity in that area. Additional generating capacity is now being proposed for the San Diego region (including northern Mexico) and the project is now being described as a means to distribute electricity generated in the San Diego region to Riverside County and other areas served by the power grid in the event that these proposed generating facilities are constructed. The project will also have substantial impacts. These impacts include: Visual impacts - The transmission lines in the Temecula area will be typically supported by a single tubular pole. These poles will be spaced 1000 to 2000 feet apart and will be typically 160 feet in height. Although this design is a "cleaner" design than the alternative metal lattice structure, the lines and poles are a significant landscape feature and diminish the natural beauty of the hillsides and valleys of our area. Economic impacts - The wine and grape industry in the Temeeula region has been calculated to have an economic value of over $100 million per year. These lines will significantly diminish the visual appeal of the wine region of Temecula, causing an undetermined reduction in tourism, property values and related adverse economic impact to the wineries and vineyards of the area. The proposed line will also require a 170-fbot typical right-of-way width. This eliminates a great deal of land from development or agricultural production, having an undetermined adverse economic impact on the region. There may also be a significant adverse impact on the hot air balloon industry which conducts many events in this area, as well as the annual Balloon and Wine Festival. This festival has been held for 18 years in this area and attracts up to 50,000 people. Impact on Public Facilities - The proposed alignment would traverse land recently approved for residential development. The transmission lines may adversely impact a proposed 40-acre sports park and school facilities planned for this area. The right-of-way required and related loss of developable land may adversely affect the overall development of this area. Certain public improvements, most notably the improvement of Pala Road, rely on the economic viability of this land to support a proposed community facilities district. The viability of this district relies on the current design of this project and significant changes may jeopardize the planned public improvements. For example, the construction of Pala Road is expected to be a 917 million project. Noise impacts - The transmission lines are a known source of noise and radio interference. These impacts will affect the residents and businesses in the area, both from a quality of life and economic perspective. Health impacts - Possible health impacts are a significant community concern. RECOMMENDATION: It is possible that some or all of these issues may be addressed in further phases of this project as hearings are held and additional studies are conducted and R:IOGRADYJISDGE TRANSMISSION LINE- COUNCIL REPORT DA TED APRIL 24, 2001.DOC 2 4/19/01 mitigation measures developed. However, voicing the community's concerns is necessary at this time in order to protect our rights to fully participate at later stages of this project's consideration by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Attorney to file a protest to this application with the CPUC at this time. The Electrical Needs Subcommittee (Mayor Comerchero and Councilmember Naggar) concur with this recommendation, FISCAL IMPACT: Costs of filing the protest are not significant. Future legal costs associated with participating in the hearings for this project are unknown at this time. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of an Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity 2. Project Map R.'IOGRADYJISDGE TRANSMISSION LINE - COUNCI£ REPORT DA TED APRI£ 24, 2001.DOC 3 4/19/01 NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY Project Name: Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project Application Number: A. 01-03-036 Proposed Project: On March 23, 2001, San Diego Gas and Electric Company ("SDG&E") applied to the California Public Utilities CornnUssinn ("CPUC") for a Certificate of Public Conven/ence and Necessity for the Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project. Purpose of Project: SDG&E is proposing the Valley Rainbow Intemonnect Project ("Project") to maintain reliable power delivery, to meet continuing growth in customer load and to provide an important link in the infrastructure expansion needed to support increased in~¢n-egionaL clectx/c power transfers. If approved, the Project also will allow maximum utilization of and access to existing and planned generating resources in California, thus enhancing statewide reliability and a competitive regional market. The Project }rill provide a significant increase in transfer capability between San Diego County and Riverside County, ~mprovzng power import capability to both areas and strengthen/rig the transmission reliability to SDG&E's existing service area in San Diego County and Orange County, and to Edison's customers in Riverside County. Project Description: If approved, the Project will provide an interconnection between SDG&E's existing 230-kilovolt ("kV") transmission system at the proposed Rainbow Substation on Rainbow Heights Road near the unincorporated community of Rainbow in San Diego County and Southern California Edison's ("SCE") existing 500 kV transm/ssinn system at the Valley Substation on Menifee Road in the unincorporated community of Romoland in Riverside County. The Project area is in northern San Diego County and western Riverside County. The slx major elements of the Project are described as follows: · 500 kV Transmission Line - A new single-circuit 500 kV transmission line, rated at approXUnately 1,000 megawatts ("MW"), would interconnect the new SDG&E Rainbow Substation with SCE's existing Valley Substation. · New Rainbow Substation - A new SDG&E 500/230/69 kV substation wonid be located in northern San Diego County to intemonnect the new 500 kV transmission line initially with SDG&E's existing 230 kV transmission systems and ultimately with SDG&E's 69 kV transmission systems. · Valley Substation Modifications - SCE's existing Valley Substation would be modified to accommodate the new 500 kV txansmission line from the Rainbow Substation. All proposed modifications would occur on existing utility-owned land within the existing facility boundaries. · Talega - Escondido 230 kV Line Upgrade - The existing Talega - Escondido 230 kV line was originally licensed and constructed using double-circuit structures with only one circuit installed. Necessary transmission upgrades to support the Project import capability would include installing the second 230 kV circuit on the existing txansmission s~-ucmres and modify/ng the existing substations at Talega and Escundido. · Rebuild of 69 kV Transmission Line - A 7.7 mile section of the existing 69 kV transmission circuit, currently installed on one side of the existing double-circuit Talega - Escondido 230 kV transmission line stzucmres and intemonnectmg SDG&E's existing Pala and Lilac substations, would be rebuilt on new 69 kV wood and steel pole smactares adjacent to the existing 230 kV line within the existing Talega - Escondido right of way. The rebuild of the 7.7 mile section of the 69 kV transmission circuit would make room for the new 230 kV circuit referenced above. · System Voltage Support - A 230 kV Static Synchronous Compensator ("STATCOM") would be added at the existing Mission Substation. Shunt capacitors would be added at Miguel and Sycamore Canyon substations (230 kV). The STATCOM would provide dynamic voltage support and the shunt capacitors would provide continuous voltage support. Both continuous and dynamic voltage support would be required to allow the increased power import levels provided by the Project. The STATCOM and shunt capacitors would be installed at existing substations owned by SDG&E. Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF): San Diego Gas and Electric Company will employ measures to reduce public exposure to EMF in accordance with CPUC Decision 93-11-013 and SDG&E's "EMF Design Guidelines for Transmission, Distribution, and Substation Facilities". SDG&E has filed copies of its Preliminary Magnetic Field Management Plan for this project as part of its Application. In addition, interested parties may contact SDG&E's Proiect Information Line at: 1-800456-6138 to receive a copy of the Preliminary Magnetic Field Management Plan and the EMF Design Guidelines. Application for CPUC Authorization: Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 1001 and CPUC General Order ("GO") 131 -D, no electhc utility shall begin construction of electric transmission line facilities designed for operation at 200 kilovolts or more without .the EPUC having first found that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require such construction. Public Review Process: Pursuant to the CPUC's Rules of Practice and Procedure and GO 131-D, you may file a protest or response to this Application within 30 days after the notice of the filing of the Application was mailed or published. This means that the protest or response must be formally filed with the ComnUssion's Docket Office (address shown below) no later than May 2, 2001 at the following address: Public Utilities Commission Docket Office Room 2001 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Copies must also be sent to: Steve Nelson or Patricia Fleming Sempra Energy 101 Ash Street San Diego, CA 92101 and Protests and/or requests for heating should include the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) Director, Energy Division Public Utilities cormmssion Energy Division 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 For assistance in filing a protest or response, please contact the CPUC Public Advisor in Los Angeles at 320 West 4ch Street, Suite 500, Los Angeles, CA 90013 or e-mail public.advisor.la~cpuc.ca.gov. If the CPUC, as a result of its preliminary investigation after such requests, determines that public hearings should be held, notice shall be sent to each person who is entitled to notice or who has requested a hearing. Additional Project Information: To obtain further information of the project, including information on where and when you can review a copy of SDG&E's Application No. 01-03-036 and the Proponent's Environmental Assessment, please call SDG&E's project information line at: 1-800-456- 6138 Your name, mailing address and daytime telephone number; A reference to the CPUC Application Number and Project name; A clear description of the reason for the protest or request for heating; and Whether you believe that evidentiary hearings are necessary to resolve factual disputes. 2.2 Project Specifications SDG&E Valley Rainbow Interconnect Proponent's Environmental Assessment Figure 2.3 . Proposed Route SCE's Valley H ¢~n~et Sun J"~. Winch.,.'stcr I [ I ~ Rainbow Subs at on i J : ' j Single Pole Mitigation Proposed Route ~ ~ ~ Redhawk-Central Route Segments 2-11 Boi-24-039 148698-01 (03/16/01)bp DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL CitY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN(~E CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, Acting City Fire Chief April 24, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of March, 2001. During the month of March, the committee developing and implementing the fire department laptop program decided to discontinue the use of the Max Responder Program. This decision was based on the software vendor's (Public Safety Corporation, PSC) inability to correct problems within their software. Fire and city staff are working with the city attorney to have all monies paid for the Max Responder software refunded due to their lack of performance. Pdor to terminating our agreement with PSC, the committee began researching other vendors to meet our software needs. The committee made contact with Plant Equipment, a local vender in Temecula. Plant Equipment has starting to market a software program that incorporates all of the fire department requirements into their software. In the limited time we have been testing their program applications in the field, the software has performed successful. Fire and city staff are currently working on a RFP to submit to plant equipment. We anticipate having the RFP process completed by the middle or end of May. The committee strongly believes we will accomplish the goals and objectives of the city council, as expected when monies were initially allocated. Continual updates will be provided to the city council as the laptop program evolves. Response Statistics for MARCH, 2001 Structure Fire 8 4 9 0 21 89 Fire 3 1 1 2 7 24 Vehicle Fire 4 5 1 2 12 30 ..Fire - Other 8 4 0 3 15 42 Medical Aid 69 61 62 97 289 785 Trat~c Collisions 18 24 4 11 57 198 Fire Menace Standby 0 3 1 5 9 34 Public Service 2 4 3 4 13 64 Hazmat N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ringing Alarm 38 46 11 15 110 338 Responses Outside of the N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTAL 150 152 92 139 533 1604' tjustment due to the Traffic Collision line ~tem, which was not previously included in the statistics breakdown. Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 173 478 Traffic Collisions Public Service Assists 39 123 4 13 2 3 6 34 27 80 0 2 0 4 2 5 0 1 253 743 Fire Menace Structure Fires Ringing Alarm Vegetation Fire Vehicle Fire .Refuse Fire Hazmat 4.4 rain Time 10 rain Medic Squad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact 90 Average Wait Time for AMR 3.6 rain N/A N/A 277 N/A Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AMR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 79 220 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 29 95 *ALS - Advanced Life Support Medic Squad Comments: · Medic Squad 84 had 1 response time of 10 minutes for the month, this response time occurred while responding to station 12's area on Pala Rd. from station 73's area. · Medic Squad 84 was out of service for mechanical repairs a total of 5 days this month, during which time Medic Squad 84R was in service. Personnel Fire Prevention 1 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 4 - Fire Safety Specialist 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire Marshal 2 - Fire System Inspectors 1 - Office Technician HI Fire Plan Check Statistics Fire Plan Check Building TI Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. 27 68 16 45 39 101 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check 17 31 2 4 Fire Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check Fire Hood Duct Plan Check Fire Spray Booth Plan Check Fire Special Suppression Plan Check Fire Alarm Plan Check Planning Case Plan Review 10 30 6 21 2 6 1 1 0 0 12 29 17 55 Fire Code Permits 0 0 TOTAL 149 391 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Inspection Statistics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell Fire-Underground Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative - Meetings etc... 14 60 14 40 7 12 3 14 9 29 1 1 6 12 9 31 4 9 0 3 1 8 11 35 0 2 11 31 0 11 6 7 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 8 3 5 0 3 102 324 Fire Misc. Inspections Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcemem TOTAL APPROVAL }7~1.~, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CiTY MANAGER ~ "' TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~ V April 24, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during March of 2001. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to thirty-seven "priority one" calls for service during the month of March, with an average response time of approximately 6.2 minutes. A total of 1,233 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month (up over 20% from last month). During the month of March, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center storefront served a total of 199 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed forty-four prints taken, twenty- four people filed police reports, sixteen people had citations signed off and six oversize vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene completed an after hours, outside lighting survey of businesses to determine compliance with the Governor's Executive Order. He also assisted in the planning for the up-coming annual "Western Days" event, which will be held during the month of April. Officer Fanene conducted twenty-four residential security visits and sixteen business visits during the month. He conducted thirty-one visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "SAFES." The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes that are continuing with the program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in three felony and two misdemeanor warrant arrests. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team also assisted with the "Every 15 Minutes" program conducted this month. The team continued their "Crime Free Parks" program and as a result they made three misdemeanor arrests for various violations. They also conducted a "Bar Action Response" program which led to one arrest and two citations. The T.A.G. program for the month was held with six volunteers assisting. No reportable violations were observed, however three pedestrian checks and two vehicle checks were made during the program. The team also worked the continuing "Homeless Assistance" program, which resulted in contacting eight subjects who were offered and refused assistance. Three homeless subjects were arrested during the month for misdemeanor offenses. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served 118 customers, seventeen fingerprints were taken, eleven reports were written and two citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of March there were 435 citations issued for hazardous violations, seventy-six citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 181 parking citations were issued. There were thirteen injury traffic collisions, thirty-two non-injury collisions were reported and twenty-eight drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of four subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 110 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The traffic team also assisted with the "Every 15 Minutes" program at Chaparral High School. During the month of March, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 152 calls for service. The predominant number of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on seven misdemeanors and three felony cases for various offenses. Four citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe provided training to mall employees on "Working with the Police." The mall officers are also working with mall merchants on an inkless check system. The officers will be conducting training in April for mall employees on the "lnkless Check" program. The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as "Stranger Danger, Loss Prevention," and other topics. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. One arrest was made at Temecula Valley High School. Deputy Kubel planned and facilitated the "Every 15 Minutes" program, which was held at Chaparral High School on February 28th and March 1se. This program was very dramatic and was an unqualified success. It received widespread praise from Chaparral High School staff, students, the local media and the parents involved. The other resource officers assisted Deputy Kubel during this program. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. Officer Sherry Adams provided training this month to Probation officers and Department of Education employees assigned to the program (Safe Schools) regarding "At Risk" juveniles. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Adams facilitated the sixty-first youth court session and conducted the sixty-second orientation meeting during the month. Officer Adams continued to work with "At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. One arrest was made during the month for a juvenile who was charged with burglary. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 During the month of March, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of twenty-nine cases. These cases resulted in twenty-eight misdemeanor and twenty-two felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued sixteen citations for various violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. The team also recovered three pounds of marijuana, thirty-one grams of methamphetamine and three weapons. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 573 hours of service in March. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance (Every 15 Minutes) and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 370 hours during the month (215 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The posse contributed 180 hours during the month. APPROV~/ff CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF F~C~ C~ ~AGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Apdl 24, 2001 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of Mamh 2001. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of March, the City received I lead and 3 inquiries from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership. Trade show leads included 171 inquiries from the - Nepcon Trade Show, 30 of which were out of state and 10 out of the country and 194 inquiries from the Comdex Trade Show in Canada. In the month of March, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 2leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of Temecula. The Alliance received 1 lead and 11 inquiries. Attached is a copy of their activity report. Film Leads & Hi~lhlil:lhts In the month of March, the Film Council received 22 phone calls regarding the Film Festival, 36 calls regarding Talent Showcase and 27 calls regarding locations information requests. Filming in Temecula The Temecula Valley Museum and Tony Tobin have been in contact with Huell Howser's California Gold producers and they have shown interest in the Giant Oak and the ranch owned by Earle Stanley Gardner. There is a possible visit next month. USC film students are looking for a small town business area for a current film production and will make a trip to Temecula when the weather is better. The taping of the Temecula Students of the Month is continuing. The students from Chaparral High School are practicing editing for next time. The next filming will be on April 23rd with the hopes of getting on TV in May. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities. CITYMGR\WOLNICKGXApril'01 DEPT.REPT.DOC 1 Media/Outreach Materials Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled "State of the City Address." The article previded highlights of the many accomplishments of the City departments including pregrems, and p~ojects that were comp;eted as well as projects undenvay. Meetings Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Business Relations Committee Meeting on March 1~. Company contacts included Waterstone, Opto 22, and ADEX Medical. and follow-up action reports were given. Committee members were assigned company visits for the following month. Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Luncheon Program Committee Meeting on March 8th. Topics and dates for future Luncheon Programs were discussed. Some of the topics included tourism, Riverside County integrated Project, and the April program, which will highlight Recruitment & Labor Law. There was also discussion on the EDC hosting a debate forum for the election in November. On March 14th, staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance meeting. Discussion items included the Labor Market RFP/Grant, budget, Alliance website, and the scope of work program for the Silicon Valley consultant. On March 15th, staff attended a planning meeting for the upcoming Career & Manufacturing Expo. The Expo will be held at Chaparral High School on 21st. Discussion items included media and flyer distribution, exhibitors, layout, program, and sponsorships. During the month of March, staff attended numerous meetings concerning the LennarlHarveston project as well as contacts with businesses regarding pending planned developments. On March 15th, Economic Development Subcommittee Members Comerchero and Roberts, and Jim O'Grady met with the Rob Moran, County of Riverside, and Stevie Hirdler, Alliance Marketing Coordinator, to discuss the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance funding request for FY2001-02. Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting on March 22"~. Discussion items included Murdeta Chamber proposal to request County redistricting, and updates on the Career & Manufacturers' Expo, Newsletter and Golf Tournament. The Wolf Creek Project Referendum and the RClP's Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan affecting Murrieta were also discussed. Staff attended a meeting at the San Diego State University on March 29t~ regarding Califomia high-speed rail. TOURISM Medial Outreach Materials Staff provided information and photos to Association News publication. Temecula wes featured in their March issue. This publication is sent to meeting planners. (See attached.) Staff provided a staff writer of the Korean Central Daily News with slides, press kit and information on the Western Days event in Old Town. CITYMGR\WOLNICKGLApriI'01DEPT.REPT.DOC 2 Staff met with Jessica Rapaido-Ybarra, writer for The San Diegan publication, on March 6th and provided her with current information on Temecula for her to reference in the Temecula chapter. The new edition will be published in June. On March 7th, staff met with Carol Walker of Sign on San Diego, to review and enhance the City's section on their site. Site Visits and FAM Tours On March 29t", the State of Califomia Tourism Officials made a site visit to Temecula. Mr. Terry Selk, Director of Travel Trade Development for the State of California Tourism Division, brought three of his tourism representatives, Leeanne Dyer representing Australia, Stefanie Eggers representing Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and Ko Ueno representing Japan. Destination Temecula provided them a tour of the aroa. Mayor Comerchero, vadous representatives of the Temecula tourism organizations and staff were able to visit with them dudng a lunch at Wilson Creek Winery. Staff worked closely with Sue McClure of San Diego This Week, Thornton Winery, the Chamber, various tourism groups and Old Town restaurants on setting up a FAM Tour for 65 concierges from the San Diego and Orange County Concierge Associations (high-end hotel properties). This was the first time both associations were brought together to learn about another tourism destination other than their own to market. The event was held on April 2nd' Travel Trade Shows City and Chamber staff attended the Los Angeles Times Travel Show March 2 - 4 at the Long Beach Convention Center. Temecula was included in the San Diego trade show exhibit. The travel show was open to travel industry professionals in the morning for a few hours each day and they opened up to consumers. The show was very well attended and Temecula received a lot of groat exposure lining up with San Diego. Many leads were generated and will be followed up with. Meetinfls Staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee Meeting on March 1~t. Staff gave an update on the City marketing activities. On March 1~, staff met with Sue McClure, San Diego This Week, Monica Brett-Serte, Concierge at the Marriott Newport Beach and Karen Brimhall with Thornton to discuss the idea of Temecula hosting a "Getting-To-Know-You Day" with the San Diego and Orange County Concierges in Temecula on April 2"d. The groups would hold their Board Meeting that evening at Thornton. The Economic Development Subcommittee members Comerchero and Roberts and staff met with the Temecula Town Association several times in March to discuss TTA issues. Staff attended the Film Festival's Preview at the Promenade Mall on March 20th. On March 12th, staff met with Gloria and Lee Easterwood regarding the development of a 'q'our of Temecula Map Guide." Staff provided the Easterwoods with information on Temecula as well as local contacts to receive additional information for their map project. On March 13th, staff met with the Chamber and restaurants that were participating in the San Diego and Orange County Concierges in Temecula event on Apdl 2"a. CITYMGR\WOLNICKG~,priI'01DEPT.REPT.DOC 3 On March 27th, staff attended the Chamber FAM Tour Planning Meeting for an upcoming FAM tour in the spdng targeting travel writers. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Newsletter Association News Article CITYMGR\WOLNICKGL~kpriI'01 DEPT.REPT.DOC 4 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 April 13, 2001 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. This is the month of March at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of March, 20 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights: Tourism & Visitors Council: Committee members are planning for the upcoming spring FAM Tour. A tentative itinerary, transportation, hotel accommodations and a listing of travel writers and columnists are being formulated. The "Tourism Big Business" presentation is available to service clubs in the area. The purpose o£the presentation is to educate the community on the importance and impact tourism has on the community. The City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce are seeking volunteers to host the Chamber's Tourism Booth. Education Committee: The committee is diligently working on the Youth Job Fair scheduled for May 19, 2001 at The Promenade in Temecula, in The Plaza near Edwards Cinema. Employers with job openings are invited to accept job applications and interview on the spot. The job fair is co-sponsored with The Promenade in Temecula, EDD, and Workforce Development Center's Hire-A-Youth Program. Workshops will be held prior to the job fair and will cover job applications, resumes, job dialogue, dress attire, and job resources. The workshops will be held at Chaparral, Temecula Valley and Rancho Vista High Schools. ROP will assist in the training of the students, and career representatives from the school districts will be involved to disseminate mlbrmation and flyers. Ways & Means Committee: The State of the City Address was held on Thursday, March 29, 2001 at the Edwards Cinema at the Promenade Mai1 and was well received by the 350 guests in attendance. Mayor Comerchero delivered a presentation recapping the accomplishments of the City of Temecula through the past year. Thank you to the City of Temecula and the entire staff for working with the Chamber to host this fabulous event. The 2001 Golf Tournament is scheduled for May 4th at Temecula Creek Inn. This year the tournament has expanded to 216 golfers. The committee is currently working on a new upcoming event named "Talk of the Town" Economic Reality for the Temecula Valley. John E. Husing, Ph.D will be the guest speaker, the event is scheduled for June 14, 2001. Local Business Promotions Committee: The committee is recruiting participants for the Shop Temecula First campaign for June. Currently 60 businesses have committed to both the June and the November campaign. The committee voted to replace the Success Seminar Series with a "Lunch & Learn" event to be held twice a year. The purpose of the luncheon will be to offer information to Chamber members that wilt benefit their business. Business of the month for April is Bragg Crane and Business Women's Network. The Mystery Shopper for April is Captain's Cabin and the Chamber Spotlight business is JDL Financial Services, Inc. and JDL Real Estate, Inc. Government Action Committee: The Government Action Committee and Board members are in the process of organizing a Pro-Business Campaign task-force. The committee and Board of Directors approved a letter to be sent to City Hall encouraging support of the process of reapportionment of supervisorial districts. Chamber representatives will be attending the 2001 Volunteer Leaders Conference in Sacramento, hosted by the Western Association of Chamber Executives and the California Chamber of Commerce. Good-Morning Sacramento is scheduled for July 24, 200l. Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 10 Ribbon Cuttings in the month of March. A very successful Mixer was held at Rancho Physical Therapy's new location on Hwy. 79 on March 21, 2001 with over 250 guests in attendance. On April 6, 2001 the newly implemented Round-Table Meetings proved to be very successful. Members discussed business insurance solutions. This new event's objective is to educate members with solutions to common problems faced in the day-to-day operation of their business. Members of the specific topic were invited to attend and provided informative information. March 28, 2001, 80 business owners attended the Ambassador Networking Breakfast. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) · 1,500 Temecula Brochures, 1,200 Winery Brochures, and 40 Visitor Guides to L.A. Times Travel Show tour operators, press and consumers attendees. · 250 Temecula Brochures to the Sheriff's Department for distribution to new recruitment officers. · 225 City Maps and 225 Visitor Guides to the City of Temecula for distribution to walk-in traffic. · 200 Winery Brochures, 150 Temecula Brochures and 150 Pechanga Entertainment Brochures for distribution at TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center. · 200 Temecula Brochures to Paseo del Sol for distribution to clients. · 200 Temecula Brochures, 200 Winery Brochures and 100 Visitor Guides to the Embassy Suites Hotel tbr distribution to guests. · 150 Visitor Guides, t00 Temecula Brochures and 100 Winery Brochures to Vail Lake RV Resorts tbr distribution to guests. · 125 Visitor Guides to the Lawrence Welk Resort tbr distribution to guests. 2 · 100 Temecula Brochures, 100 Winery Brochures and 90 Visitor Guides to Century 2l-Newsom for distribution to clients. · 100 Winery Brochures to Creekside Texaco for distribution to tourists. · 50 Temecula Brochures to ComSoft Corporation for distribution at an upcoming regional meeting. · 50 Temecula Brochures to Temeku Hills Sales Office for distribution to clients. · 50 Winery Brochures to Outdoor Resorts for distribution to guests. · 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Southern California Department of Agriculture for distribution at a study tour in Temecula. · 40 Temecula Brochures to All Aboard America for distribution to a group touring Temecula. · 35 Winery Brochures for distribution to Dr. St. John for distribution to tour guests. · 30 Visitor Guides and 30 Pechanga Entertainment Brochures to the Best Western Guest House for distribution to guests. · 25 Winery Brochures to Kathleen Callan for distribution at a family reunion. · 20 Visitor Guides to A-I Solutions for distribution to visitors. · 20 City Maps, 20 Temecula Brochures, 20 Visitor Guides and 20 Winery Brochures to the U.S. Border Patrol for disu-ibution to new agents relocating to the area. · 15 Visitor Guides and 15 Winery Brochures to Custom Leisure Services for distribution to visitors attending a tour of Temecula. · 10 Temecula Brochures, 10 Visitor Guides and 10 Winery Brochures to Riverside Elks Camper Club for distribution to club members visiting Temecula. · 10 Winery Brochures and 10 Temecula Brochures to Levison Search Association for distribution to clients. Marketing Highlights: The City of Temecula, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce and the Tourism & Visitors Council representatives conducted two exciting marketing opportunities on March 26, 2001 and April 2, 2001. Tourism officials from the State of California; Terry Selk, Director of Travet Trade Development and representatives from Japan, Germany and Australia requested a tour of Temecula. The day consisted of a tour of the Temecula Museum, Old Town Temecula, lunch at Wilson Creek Winery, Stuart Cellars, Churon Winery, Temecula Creek Inn and concluded with a tour of the Pechanga Entertainment Center. 65 Concierges and 4 Board Members from the San Diego and Orange County areas requested Temecula as a destination to host their general meeting. On Monday, April 2, 2001 the Concierges enjoyed a Welcome Reception, a taste of Old Town Restaurants, Tour of Old Town Temecula, Museum Tour, Wine Tour, Evening Reception and dinner at Thornton Winery. Activity Report: · Total Tourism calls were 1,921 in March. · Total Phone calls were 3,706 in March. · Total Walk-ins were up 4.34 percent in March. · Total Mailings were 345 in March. · E-mail requests were up 32.77 percent in March. Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Membership and Marketing Committee, Local Business Promotions, Government Actions. If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to call me. Thank you. Mayor JeffComerchero Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Stone Councilman Sam Pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shaw~n Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary T~omhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordina~r TVCC Board of Di~t:tors TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MARCH, 2001 PHONE CALLS TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL PHONE CALLS * CHAMBER REFERRALS WALK-INS TOURISM CALENDAR OF EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS CHAMBER MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL WALK-INS MAILINGS TOURISM RELOCATION DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL MAILINGS E-MAIL TOURISM RELOCATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL Chamber Vis. Center This Month This Month 369 237 223 1,092 1,921 250 88 1,266 181 3,706 N/A 364 181 97 1141 291 117 935 184' 3,310 168 104 73 345 47 47 141 235 N/A 44 8 53 204 5 0 1 56 371 THIS MONTH 3,706 3,681 345 235 Total Year-To-Date 1,024 579 914 3,341 5,858 632 226 4,076 545 11,337 N/A 1,208 489 321 3,575 70O 255 2,664 550 9,762 411 377 28O 1,068 143 135 317 595 N/A YEAR-TO-DATE 11,337 9,762 1,068 595 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber Percentage March, 2000 March, 2001 Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 466 369 -20.82 Calendar of Events 213 237 11.27 Special Events 342 223 -34.80 General information 1,573 1,092 -30.58 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,594 1,921 -25.94 RELOCATION 211 250 18.48 DEMOGRAPHICS 118 88 -25.42 CHAMBER 2,332 1,266 -45.71 MISCELLANEOUS 223 181 -18.83 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 5,478 3,706 -32.35 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 280 364 30.00 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 196 181 -7.65 SPECIAL EVENTS 94 97 3.19 GENERAL INFORMATION 1031 1141 10.67 RELOCATION 188 291 54.79 DEMOGRAPHICS 143 117 -18.18 CHAMBER 1040 935 -10.10 MISCELLANEOUS 163 184 12.88 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 393' 371 -5.60 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,528 3,681 4.34 MAILINGS TOURISM 154 168 9.09 RELOCATION 139 104 -25.18 DEMOGRAPHICS 132 73 -44.70 TOTAL MAILINGS 425 345 -18.82 E-MAIL TOURISM 51 47 -7.84 RELOCATION 41 47 14.63 MISCELLANEOUS 85 141 65.88 TOTAL E-MAIL 177 235 32.77 * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls April 12,2001 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RE: Activity Summary - March 2001 Activities of the EDC for tbe month of March were as follows: Business Development Staff received the following eight business development leads for the month of March: · An in-person visit with Ansar Firdosi who is searching for a sight to start up a plastic manufacturing/extrusion business. Mr. Firdosi currently lives in the Bay area and will be moving to Southwest Riverside County within the next year. Staff provided Mr. Firdosi with various demographic and resource information for Southwest Riverside and provided contact information on local plastic/extrusion businesses. · A phone inquiry and later an in-person visit with Dick Ritz of Bio Stimulants, Inc. m Temecula. Mr. Ritz is seeking contact information on the Lake Elsinore Watershed Project. Staff provided Mr. Ritz with information on the project and information on Eastern Mumcipal Water District and Metropolitan Water District. · Staff assisted McCall's CountIy Canning with ~affing contacts that included information for Diversified The Staffing SolutiotL, Manpower Temporary Services, and the Employment Development Department. McCall's manufactures fragrant candle products and is relocating to Murrieta from Missouri. · An in-person visit with Mike Coats of Americor in Hemet. Staff provided Mr. Coats with demographic and contact information on Diamond Valley Lake, and a list of local cxmunercial brokers. · A phone inquiry from MaryAnn Cunni~gham, who is looking to start a new business. Staff provided Ms. Cnnningham with a Business Resource Guide. · A phone inquiry from Tom Courbat of ExecufiveLinkage.com, an Interact-based executive search enterprise. Mr. Courbat was seeking a possible link to the EDC website as a resource for worlcforce development. · An in-person visit with Chris Brinkley who was referred by Bob Larson, Guidant retired. Mr. Brinldey has relocated to Mumeta and was seeking possible business opportunities with local companies. Mr. Brinkley provided staff with a resume and indicated his interest to volunteer for EDC activities. Staff emailed Mr. Bdnkley's resume to board and EDC members for employment counections. · An in-person visit with Jake Jacobson of Valley Metal Treating, Inc. Mr. Jacobson was seeking contacts of industrial businesses. Staff provided Mr. Jacobson with contact information to the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Temeoala to obtain business license lists. · An in-persoa visit with Ann Burgher with AFLAC Insuumee. Ms. Burgher recently moved fi~om Georgia and was seeking to meet community leaders in the region. Staff invited Ms. Burgher to attend the EDC Business Relations Committee meeting. Ms. Burgner attended and has indicated she wishes to join the EDC. Marketing, Outreach Staff attended the following meetings/events: Jim O'Grady City of Temecula Activity Summary - March 2001 Page 2 of 2 March 2, 2001 - Murrieta Temeeula Group - Staff attended the regularly scheduled monthly meeting at Bailey's Winery in Temeeula. Presenters were Riverside County Supervisor Bob Buster and a representative of the Riverside County Transportation Commission. March 9, 2001 - Temecula CONNECT Links Lunch - Staff attended the monthly lunch at UCR Extension in Temeeula. "IT Education in the Inland Empire -- Tapping into the Region's Hidden Teeh Workforee" was presented by keynote speaker Eric Blum, director of Information Technology and Engineerin4g, UCR Extension. · March 21, 2001 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council Meeting - Staff attended the general Board of Directors meeting of the Manufacturers' Council at Guidant Corp. Staff serves as an honorary board member. · March 27, 2001 - Murrieta Creek Workshop - Staff attended the Murrieta Creek workshop at Mumeta Council Chambers. Presentations were provided to attendees regarding the various alternatives to the Murrieta Creeks alignment. · March 29, 2001 - Temecula State of the City - Staff attended the Temeeula State of the City event at the Edwards Cinema Theaters in Temeeula. Business Relations · March 1, 2001 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee Meeting. (See meeting minutes for details.) Administration/Organization · March 8, 2001 - EDC Program Committee Meeting - Committee members discussed possible topics and guest speakers for future EDC luncheons. · March 13, 2001 - SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo Meeting - Staff attended a plannin4 meeting with the Career Expo Committee to discuss details of the upcoming Southwest Riverside County Career & Manufacturers' Expo scheduled for April 21, 2001 at Chaparral High School in Temeeula. · March 14, 2001 - SWRC Economic Alliance Meeting - Staff attended the monthly meeting to discuss marketing and business attraction strategies with Alliance partners. · March 22, 2001 - EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in the Workforce Development Center in Temeeula. (See meeting minutes for details.) · March 27, 2001 - Worldorce Devdopment Center Ali-Staff Meeting was held at the Temeeula Center. Topics included mutual issues and interests relative to each agency in the Center. · March 27, 2001 - Workforce Development Center Safety Team Meeting - Staff is a team member for the Temeeula WDC Safety Team. Policies and protocol for rolling blackouts in the workplace were discussed. · Administration - During the month of March, stuff managed the daily operations of the EDC office, coordinated details for the quarterly luncheon to be held on April 26, coordinated details for the upcoming Career & Manufacturers' Expo scheduled for April 21, mailed out 300 golf tournament announcements and sponsorship letters, and attended a five-week evening course in Grantsmanship at UC Riverside Extension in Riverside. Class began on February 28 and finished on March 28. This concludes the activity summary for March 2001. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Sincerely, Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Riverside County ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, March 1, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA AGENDA Time Guide* Subiect 9:00 a.m. 9:01 a.m. 9:03 a.m. 9:30 a.m. 9:35 a.m. 9:40 a.m. 10:00 a.m. *Actual times may va~ Welcome Follow-up Action Reports · Waterfall Oasis Company Contact Reports · Waterstone - L. Moss & & M. O'Connor · Opto 22 - J. O'CJrady · Hessco Theraquip, Inc. - G. Youmans · CKS Multi-Media - G. Youmans · Beaver Medical Group - G. Youmans · Adex Medical - G. Youmans · Others Goal Progress Report New Committee Assignments · Strategic Visits EDC News and Information · EDC Board Update · City, County, and Chamber News · SWRC Manufacturers' Council Update · Economic Alliance Update · Economic Alliance Visitation List Adjournment Next Business Relations Committee Meeting: Thursday. April 5, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Location: Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room, 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING Thursday, March 22, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforee Development Center 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA BOARD MEMBERS Marlene Best, City of Lake Elsinore Ron Bradley, Temecula CONNECT Dennis Frank, UCR Extension Ted Hating, Eastern Municipal Water District Ron Holliday, City of Murdeta Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank Jim King, The Gas Company Rob Moran, Riverside County EDA Phil Oberhansley, Cannon Parks & Oberhansley Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Bonnie Renz-Hanna, Diversified The Staffing Solution Gary Youmans, Community National Bank EDC STAFF Diane Sessions MEMBERS AND GUESTS Stevie Hirdler, SWRC Economic Alliance CALL TO ORDER · President Gary Youmans called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. MINUTES · Motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded by David Rosenthal and carded unanimously to approve the minutes of the February 22, 2001 Board of Directors Meeting as amended by striking "UCR" and replacing with "Beckman Institute" in the first sentence of page 4 under Open Discussion - SWRC Manufacturers' Council. FINANCIAL REPORT · The Board reviewed the February 28, 2001 Financial Report that showed total monthly income of $t,057, total expenses of $6,692, and total cash-in-bank of $77,410. Diane Sessions reported unfavorable variances year-to-date in Total Revenues of $8,435 and favorable variances year-to-date in Total Expenses of $21,168. Motion was made by Keith Johnson, seconded by Bonnie Hanna and carded unanimously to approve the February 28, 2001 Financial Report as presented. · Approve FY 2001-02 Operating Budget: The Board reviewed the dratt 2001-2002 Operating Budget that showed total projected revenue and expenses of $104,000. Ms. Sessions reported there were various line items reduced or removed from the previous year's budget due to non-applicability. Discussion was held relative to how the County contribution would reflect in the budget. Rob Moran reported the County would reimburse the EDC for rent of the current fiscal year and requested an invoice be sent to him. Mr. Moran reported the County would continue to support the EDC with an in-kind contribution of office space at the Temecula Workforce Development Center. He further stated the County would not require the EDC to pay monthly rent for the coming fiscal year, which would eliminate the reimbursement process. The Board agreed Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting -March 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 2 of 4 the FY 2001-02 budget should reflect the reimbursement from the County as "Previous Year's Reimbursement" and also should note the County's current in-kind contribution, although there would be no material rent income or expenses. Motion was made by Ron Bradley, seconded by Dennis Frank and carded unanimously to approve the FY2001-02 Operating Budget as amended by noting the County's current in- kind contribution of rent valued at $11,200. NEW BUSINESSS · Ratify Resolution #2001-01 - Opposition to the Wolf Creek Specific Plan Referendum: The Board reviewed Resolution #2001-01 that was adopted on February 22, 2001. Board members commended Gary Youmans for his leadership in supporting the organization's mission statement. Motion was made by Ted Haring, seconded by Jim King and carried to ratify Resolution #2001-01-Opposition to the Wolf Creek Specific Plan Referendum as presented. Jim O'Grady and Rob Moran abstained. · Ratify Resolution #2001-02 - Not Support the Proposed Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan Affecting the City of Murdeta: The Board reviewed Resolution #2001-02 that was adopted on January 25, 2001. The Board suggested the resolution be sent to local, state and federal legislatures. Motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded by Ron Bradley and carried to ratify Resolution #2001 - Not Support the Proposed RCIP's Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Affecting the City of Murrieta as presented. Jim O'Grady and Rob Moran abstained. · Marlene Best reported the City of Lake Elsinore was united with the City of Murfieta to oppose the proposed RCIP Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. She further reported the County had proposed that approximately 10,300 acres of commercial/industrial/residential-zoned land in Lake Elsinore along 1-15 and Hwy. 74 corridors be set aside for habitat preservation. She asked the Board to oppose the proposed habitat conservation sites in Lake Elsinore identified under the RCIP. Motion was made by Run Bradley, seconded by Dennis Frank and carded to adopt a resolution in support of the City of Lake Elsinore to limit the areas designated for habitat conservation within the City's influence and to forward said resolution to local, state and federal legislature. Jim O'Grady and Rob Moran abstained. · Appoint Nominating Committee: Gary Youmans asked for five volunteers to serve on the 2001 Nominating Committee for the director elections. Bonnie Hanna, Jim O'G-rady, Ted Haring, David Rosenthal and Marlene Best volunteered to serve on the committee. Ga~ Youmans appointed said committee members. CONTINUING BUSINESS · Munieta Chamber Proposal to Request County Redistricting: Ron Holliday reported the Chamber would continue theft discussion on county redistricting through a joint committee formed with the Temecula Chamber. He would provide further details at a future EDC board meeting. · Manufacturers' Career Fair Update: Diane Sessions reported plans were moving forward and 21 companies to date would participate. Large employers included Chemicon, Guidant, Laser Power Corporation, Milgard Windows, Professional Hospital Supply, Scotts, Southwest Traders, U.S. Border Patrol, and others. · Newsletter Update: Diane Sessions reported the newsletter was mailed on March 20, and the next quarterly newsletter would be printed and mailed in late June. She suggested a feature article could include a retrospective to highlight the EDC's 10-year anniversary. Ms. Sessions asked that articles be submitted in early May. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - March 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 3 of 4 Golf Tournament Update - Ga~ Youmans reported all major sponsors were secured for the golf tournament and the flyer and sponsor letters were mailed. Ga~ Youmans reported he received a letter of resignation from Bob Lopez that indicated he could no longer serve on the EDC Board due to the current state of Southern California Edison. Mr. Youmans called Bob Lopez to discuss the positive support to the EDC by Edison in past years and asked Mr. Lopez to withdraw his resignation. Mr. Lopez withdrew his resignation and would continue his term as a director. OPEN DISCUSSION * EDC Administrative Update: The Board reviewed the February 2001 EDC Monthly Activity Report submitted by Diane Sessions. Gary Youmans thanked Jim O'Grady and others for support letters sent on his behalf as nominee for SBA's National Financial Services Advocate of the Year. Mr. Youmans reported he was honored with the award and would travel to Washington DC in May. Jim King provided a media kit of The Gas Company, which would serve to ease negative public relations due to the power shortage crisis. · City, County and Chamber Updates: City of Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported the City attorney concluded the petition against the Wolf Creek project was insufficient, and consequently not submitted to the County Registrar. The City attorney determined that adopted City resolutions and the Wolf Creek Specific Plan was not made available during the petition drive, which invalidated the petition. Mr. O'Grady stated that requests to arbitrate the petition's validity was deemed not lawful. The Board discussed a possible referendum by special interest groups to halt construction of the Temecula Ridge apartments. Other matters reported by Mr. O'Grady were the Belaggio project would proceed with no appeals; construction of Scotts was moving forward with an anticipated opening date in July 2001; the City building department would be scheduling tours of the construction site; the State of the City would be held on March 29 at Edwards Cinema Theaters in Temecula; community newsletters were mailed; and Southwest Traders would expand to 75,000 square feet through fast tracking. Jim O'Grady thanked the EDC for submitting the resolution and support letter to endorse SANDAG as the lead agency for the State Interregional Partnership Grant. Grant funds would be used to analyze the impacts of job and housing imbalances and develop mitigation policies. City of Lake EIsinore - Marlene Best reported the Padres exhibition game would be held at Storm Stadium next week; bids for the McVicker fire station were out and the project was moving forward; the Chamber EDC luncheon was scheduled for April 12 at Diamond Stadium and would include a presentation by the Small Business Development Corp.; water and lake issues would be discussed at the next city council meeting; Davcon completed tenant improvements on two new industrial buildings and occupants would move in soon; the south side of Hwy. 74 would see commercial/industrial development; the season opener for the lake was scheduled for April 7; the City would be an exhibitor at the Fred Hall Boat Show in Del Mar; and Totally Themed in Lake Elsinore would hold a special reception and tour of their company on April 5 & 6. C/ty of Murrieta - Ron Holliday reported an informal workshop would be held on March 27 for the Murrieta Creek project and groundbreaking for the new police station was scheduled for April 3. County of Riverside EDA - No report available. SWRC Economic Alliance - Stevie Hirdler reported the Alliance entered its third year; the marketing CD-ROM was moving forward; and a company that manufacturers golf shafts would consider relocation to Southwest Riverside. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - Bonnie Hanna reported the official groundbreaking for the new site was on April 26; sponsorships for the crystal wall were still available; and the Chamber's golf tournament was on May 4 at Temecula Creek Inn and would include 27 holes. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting - March 22, 2001 Minutes - Page 4 of 4 * SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosenthal reported the Council's luncheon went well and the next would be held in May. The topic would include industry clustering and brief state-of-the-region updates. Mr. Rosenthal reported he would like to hold a meeting on power shortage issues. He further stated the Council's website was revamped, and new brochures and business cards were completed. · EDC Business Relations Committee Update - Ga~y Youmans reported that visits to local businesses were on track. ADJOURNMENT · The Board adjourned the meeting at 10:05 a.m. Respectively submitted by: Diane Sessions Phil Oberhansley Recording Secretary Board Secretary 3/14/01 SWRC Economic Alliance Meeting Present Jim O'Grady Gloria Wolmek Al Volbrect Marlene Best Diane Sessions Sarah Mandy Rob Moran Teresa Gallavan Stevie Hirdler Forbes -Labor StudyfNOFA - Jim shared that the RFP for the Labor Study was submitted to WRCOG/SANDAG on 3/9/01and we should be notified in June as to whether the Alliance has been awarded a grant for this project. Jim also stated that each partner might be contacted by WRCOG for letters of support. Budget - The budget for contract year 00-01 was reviewed and discussed. The revised copy will be provided to each partner, It was agreed that the data for '~New Proposed Marketing Expenses" should be reformatted. The $6,000 allotted for "direct mail" will be taken out and placed in "consultant services", with an additional $1,000 from "unallocated funds" to total $15,000, which is the total consultant fee for Phase I and Phase II. With the above-mentioned changes, the budget was approved unanimously. CD-ROM - Script and copy was provided to each partner for review for the CD-ROM. Comments were to add a brief "generic" conunent under utilities. A power point presentation or draft CD will need to be viewed before print of copies. Suggestions for testimonials include Jim Lewis with AIMS, Susan Norton with Guidant or Bob Dowden with Guidant discussing how the assets of SWRC enable him to recruit employees. Al suggested that an interview with a business owner who went through the fast track process and the experience they had in getting their business relocated. It was mentioned that still pictures at the Padres game at the Storm in Lake Elsinore would be great to see on the CD. It was discussed that stock pictures are available through photographer Chip Morton, John Edwards or Dave Curtis. The timeline for the CD will be amended and provided to each partner. Web-site - The idea of updating the Alliance web-site was discussed and agreed upon. Before proceeding, however, I will provide a list of applications at our next meeting in April. Web-sites that were referred to as model sites were the city web-sites for Vallejo, Rancho Cueamonga and San Mateo. The partners also agreed that providing a link to available sites in SWRC through Loop Net is important. This can be done through the EDC web-site. It was also agreed that using the GIS system would be a benefit to users. This will enable the user to obtain demographic reports, parcel information, detailed site reports etc. I will be contacting Pablo for more information on GIS applications features and costs. Ron Nater/Sili¢on Valley - The scope of work for retaining Ron Nator was provided to each parmer, reviewed and approved with minor changes. A new copy is attached to these minutes. It was agreed to proceed, however, a timeline must be provided from Mr. Nater. It was also agreed that we inquire as to whether certain phases can be done simultaneously. The partners also agreed that they would like to see Mr. Nater go through the permit process as well as talk to people who have gone through it for feedback. In the formal agreement between thc County of Riverside and Mr. Nater, we will indicate that thc total fee for both phases is $15,000 and attach the timeline. I mentioned during our meeting that Mr. Nater is out of town until March 26. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT March 2001 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Sheri Davis, Pat Martinez, Judi Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 115 phone calls; 22- Film Festival, 27- locations information requests, 36- Talent Showcase, 30- council business. · The TVFC web site. www.temeculafilmorg has received 808 "hits" since it opened on September 4, 2000. Photo and link updates are a continuous process. · The "Great Temecula Shoot Out" began on February 17 and due to weather conditions has been extended to continue throughout the year. Participants are calling when their cameras are ready for developing. Over 120 disposable cameras have been assigned to local groups and individuals to take pictures of the special places they know of in the Temecula Valley.378 photographs have been developed so far. TVFC will be placing the first postcard order in April. Local response has been very favorable. New photos will be chosen for Temecula Postcards and later a 16 month calendar of "Temecula Through Our Eyes" as we see what develops · To date, 27 locations inquiries have been received directly related to our attendance at Locations Expo 2001. Many photographs have been sent and with better weather, we expect to meet with locations scouts very soon. · Temecula Talent Showcase 2001 is scheduled for May 19th at the CRC. Over 70 acts have been scheduled for auditions which will be held on April 7t~ & 8th. · Volunteer and production meetings for the Temecula Valley Film and Music "Festival 2001" are continuing on a monthly basis at this time. A special Sponsors Pre-Festival party was held on March 20th at the Promenade Mall. Food and entertainment were provided. Sponsorship packages were available for all those attending. Filming in Temecula The taping of the Temecula Students of the Month is continuing.. The students from Chaparral High School are practicing editing for next time. The next filming will be on April 23rd with the hopes of getting on TV in May. · The Temecula Valley Museum and Tony Tobin have been in contact with Hueli Howser's California Gold producers and they have shown interest in the Giant Oak and the ranch once owned by Erie Stanley Gardner. There is a possible visit in the near future. · USC film students are looking a small town business area for a current film production and will make a trip to Temecula when the weather is better. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE SUCCESSES ~rhe I£EP reports monthly on significant real estate b-ansaCtions that occurred with or without the assistance of ~££P, in order to provide leads to our membem,) Home Depot, which currently has a distribution center in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, is expanding its operations with the construction of a 150,000 square foot transportation facility on a 30-acre site in the city of Rialto. The company anticipates hiring 500 new employees. The financial investment is estimated at $12,000,000. The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) conducted the site search for this project and coordinated meetings between the client and partnering cities. IEEP has also worked with this.company in the past on Inland Empire expansion projects. Ponica Industrial Co., Ltd., serving the audio and video recording industries as well as CD replication, has expanded within Corona moving its headquarters to 125 S.'Klug Circle in Corona:The purchase of this 54,511 square foot building has resulted in a $3,379,682 deal. The company estimates they will be adding 15 new positions to accommodate their expansion. Ray Schumaker of Lee & Associates, Ontario, represented the buyer and Timothy Hawke of Grubb & Ellis Company represented the seller, Marshall J. Stewart, in this transaction. Eagle One, a leader in the development and manufacturing of automotive care products, leased 40,157 square feet of space at 14575 Yorba Avenue in Chino. This five-year lease is valued at $965,000'. Cameron Driscoll and Scott Evans of Cushman &'Wakefield Inc. represented the lessee. Source: CoStar DisCopyLabs Inc. (DCL), a manufacturer, warehouser, and distributor fo~ software and hardware companies, is relocating their City of Industry facility to 2950 East Jurupa Avenue in Ontario. The company has signed a five-year lease valued at $965,000. The number of new jobs to the region is not available at this time. Source: CoStar Construction is underway on HomeCenter Ontario, a 130,000 square-foot retail center located at Milliken Avenue and the 1-10 Freeway. Tenants signed to date include Levitz Furniture, Krause's Sofas, Thomasville, Arizona Leather, Mattress Discounters, Denny's Restaurant and others. The center is scheduled to open in Fall 2001. The project is being marketed by lan Brown, Walter Pagel, and Vanessa Brown of Grubb & Ellis Company. CALENDAR ITEMS To register online for SBDC events: w~mw. iesbdc.org April: A "Business Planning Workshop" is being offered during the following dates, times and locations: IApri~ 25 April 26 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. San Bernardino April 26 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Murrieta Riverside 6p.m. to8p.m. This workshop is free of charge. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. April 18: Attend the "Marketing Your Small Business'; workshop in San Bernardino from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and learn how to increase sales, profitability, and efficiently manage your marketing dollar. Cost is $20. For more information contact Melanie Cote.at (909) 781-2345. April 24: "Doing Business with the Government" is a workshop designed to pro~/ide you with a simple overview of how to sell your products and services to the Federal, State and Local government. This workshop is being held at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Cost is $20. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. April 25: "Trains, Planes & Automobiles" will be the topic of discussion for the April Membership Luncheon that will be held from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Mission Inn, San Diego Room, Riverside. Cost is $25. For more information contact Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090. April 28: An expert from Birdwell & Associates is conducting a seminar entitled "Quick Success With QuickBooks Accounting Software" (Intermediate/Advanced-Part II) from 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $25. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. May: A "Business Planning Workshop" is being offered during the following dates, times and locations: May 2 May 8 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. Riverside May 9, 23 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. San Bernardino 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Ontario May 10, 24 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. Murrieta This workshop is free of charge. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. May 3, 10, 17: A three-week, comprehensive seminar entitled "Develop Your Plan For Success" is being held from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside.' Cost is $40. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. May 1,8, 15: "Selling 1,2,3" is a series of workshops designed to enhance skills necessary in improving relationships with clients. This workshop will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. in Ontario. Cost is $40. For more information call (909) 466-6244. May 9: A seminar entitled "How to Buy Accounting Software" is being offered from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $25. For more information contact Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345. 119LAIgD EMPIRE ECOIgOMIC 119VESTIVIENT COLLABORATIVE For the third year, the Inland Empire Economic Investment Collaborative (IEEIC) is requesting proposals from area schools seeking funding for programs linking education to business. Last year $129,000 in funds from Improving' America's Schools Act provided enrichment programs in eight schools throughout Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Area schools will utilize funding from both the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools and the Riverside County Office of Education to enhance business relationships with schools, provide professional development for teachers, and increase parental participation in a child's learning. Proposals may be submitted to Janice Moore, Program Manager, at (909) 781-6623. FOUR H ANNUAL GOLF CLASSIC Time Is Getting Short ~ We Need Your Support IEEP invites you to the Foundation's "Fourth Annual Golf Classic" on Monday, May 7th at Moreno Valley Ranch Golf Club Schedule of Events 10:30 a.m. ~ Registration & Lunch 11:30 a.m. ~ Putting Contest 12:15 p.m. ~ Cart Staging C~OLF CLASSIC 12:30 p.m. - Shotgun Start 5:30 p.m. - Dinner (Steak Buffet) 6:00 p.m.-Awards & Raffle Awards: Trophies will be awarded to the 1st place team. Gift Certificates will be awarded to the 2nd and 3rd place teams with the Mayor's Cup Challenge being awarded to the city team with the lowest score whereby they will get to keep the trophy for display until our next tournament in 2002! Hole-In-One Prizes: 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, complete set of Alien DS-9 golf clubs plus two-year Smartcare Maintenance Program, three year supply of. new Spalding Strata Golf Balls, 4 day/3 night golf vacation for two at the El Dorado Resort Hotel in Reno, Nevada. Raffle Prizes: Air travel on Southwest Airlines, golf clubs, golf bags, rounds of golf, theme park tickets, and much more. To join the fun, please contact Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090. CHECK US OUT I I I IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT &lARCH Business Development - noted three leads, 545 inquiries, one Site Selector Outreach, and two site tours. The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) - registered 196 total days of film activity and 177 requests for locations, with 15 permits issued in San Bernardino County, sever~ issued in Riverside County, and 11 issued for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $7,033,500. Small Business Development Center (SBDC) - reported the creation of 49 jobs and the retention of one job for an economic impact of $1,353;194. The SBDC counseled 276 clients for 952 client hours, and conducted 18 training events for 351 training hours and 951 attendees. International Trade recorded one export action for $600,000. WELCOME 19EW MEMBERS · Cucamonga County Water District is an independent special district that supplies high quality, reliable drinking water to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and portions of Upland, Ontario, Fontana and unincorporated San Bernardino County. Robert DeLoach, General Manager/CEO, can be reached at (909) 987-2591. SMALL BUSIIgESS DEVELOPMENT CEIgTER G and Opening The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is hosting a grand opening celebration for its newest office, Inland Empire West SBDC, located at 4141 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 231, Ontario. This office will serve the communities of Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Fontana, Chino, Chino Hills, and Montclair. Additionally, the SBDC has recently opened two outreach offices. The city of Barstow and the SBDC have partnered to provide services to Barstow and the surrounding communities opening an office at Barstow City Hall that will be open from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. every Thursday. The Corona office is located at the Corona Economic Development Department and is open every Wednesday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. E-Tech News [IEHTC] IE-TechNews is now reaching several hundred people on a biweekly basis. The IE High Technology program has also gained the services of two interns from the University of California, Riverside, A. Gary Andegson School of Management to assist in the coordination of this project. MISSION TO JAPAN... Anothe Wild California IIVIAX Film Adventure Sarah Miggins, V.P. of Economic Development, participated in a weeklong business development mission and ~ttended two Wild California IMAX screenings in Tokyo and Osaka. The delegation included representatives from the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC), San Luis Obispo EVC, University of Southern California USC), California Technology, Trade and Commerce Agency, and NorCal Idea. The group met with several companies and governmental agencies throughout the week to discuss future business opportunities.. The trip was very exciting and encouraging despite the economic challenges in Japan. SBA AWARDS The annual SBAAwards program, hosted by IEEP and SBDC, is scheduled for Thursday, May 17th from 11:'30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Ontario Convention Center. The theme of the program is "Small-Business America's Favorite Pastime" and will feature a very creative and entertaining program. For more information contact Marsha Robers at (909) 781-2345 ext 14. Please send materials for consideration to Diane Evans. Submissions can be sent by e-mail to devans@ieep.com, or by fax to (909) 890-1088. All materials should be received by the last Friday of each month. INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP 301 East Vanderbilt Way, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 890-1090 Fax (909) 890-1088 tooms@ Jeep.com - www.ieep.com Gloria Wo[nick City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MARCH 200:1 ' a'ti0n $0C.1 ....... AMERICA'S MOST-READ MAGAZINE FOR STATE AND REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Susan Schwartz has been named executive director of the Exposition Service Contr~lli~ tors gssoci~tY~ now baseq~,~t~ Las Vegas*a~l~i; Publisher's Letter Re-recruiting your staff members. Rapid Response Form Subscriptions and info the easy way. Destination: Inland to the Mountains Stops near California's Route 66 beckon state and regional groups. Convention Planner These cities welcome associations. -~-~,~ Making the Rounds An update on the local societies. Resource Directory Suppliers and services that are eager ~ ~ to do business with associations. ~--~,~ Calendar of Events Upcomingindustry gatherings. 25 Words That Work Te'ing your or anization'.to , g? lnternet Q&A AssociationCentral.com helps associations spread the word. :*::*: AU T O:*::*::*::*::*:.a.-"n~.,~ 3- D I G I T 925 GLORIA PZOLt4ICK TEMECULA C/T¥' HALL by Barbara Beckley WIith Nevada always in the spotlight because of the glittering lights of Las Vegas, Reno and Laughlin, and Utah stepping onto the international stage because of the upcoming 2002 Olympic Winter Games, these two states have never been hotter as destinations for meetings. What delegate wouldn't be eager and curious to experience the multimillion-dollar comforts and state-of-the-art facilities being created in both states to entertain and accommodate visitors? Natural beauty from pristine Lake Tahoe to surreal Bryce Canyon add to the attraction for record-setting gatherings. Accommodations throughout both states--from retreat-style hideaways to large and advanced convention centers---en- sure a warm welcome for state and regional association gatherings of any size and any budget. Easy access b~ air and land make getting there that much easier PRSRT STD LAS VEGAS: KING OF THE HILL 0.$. POS'flOE As the new millennium revs up, Las Vegas con- S~? F'3 T,e*o., ~ZI tinues to exceed expectations. As the nation's top P"*r~°~g'~z~ I meeting and convention destination (more than 3.7 million attendees gather in Las Vegas each year), the city offers 125,093 hotel guest rooms and 6 mil- (continued on page 30) Salt Lake City's skyline is reflected in Abravanal Hall, which is located adjacent to the Salt Palace Convention Center. DESTINATION: iNLAND TO THE MOUNTAINS carved stones and Victorian mansions add to the charm of this palm-lined city. The renovated and expanded Riverside Convention Center is part of a quaint downtown filled with restaurants and art galleries. The convention center of- fers 50,000 square feet of flexible meet- lng space for groups of up to 2,500 peo- ple. A new outdoor plaza connects the convention center to the Spanish archi- tecture of downtown Riverside. Next door, the 296-room Holiday Inn/River- side offers nine meeting rooms for groups of up to 290 people. A block from the convention center, the historic 237-room Mission Inn is one of California's oldest hotels and includes two chapels. The larger of the two, the Chapel of St. Francis of Assisi, is a popu- lar place for weddings. Bette Davis, Richard Nixon and IIumphrey Bogart tied the knot there. The inn's 14,000 square feet of indoor meeting space in 11 meeting rooms and 5,000 square feet of outdoor courtyard function space can ac- commodate up to 300 people. The hotel's 2,300-square-foot ballroom can accom- modate up to 250 people. Riverside has a total of 2,000 guest rooms. The 286-room Holiday Inn Se- lect includes meeting space for up to 180 people, and the 163-room Riverside Courtyard by Marriott offers confer- ence facilities for up to 100 people. The 163-room Days Inn/Riverside offers fa- cilities for groups of up to 150 people. ONTARIO: IRON STRONG In the early 1900s, Ontario resident Earl II. Richardson invented the iron, earning the city the nickname "iron capital of the world." Founded as a model colony by two Canadian broth- ers in 1882, Ontario has several other claims to fame, including Ontario Mills, the largest shopping center in Califor- nia. If need be, a U.S. space shuttle can land at Ontario Airport. For meeting planners, the airport provides a more practical advantage: It is only two min- utes from the Ontario Convention Cen- ter and its 70,000 square feet of column- free space, 20,000-square-foot ballroom and 20,000 square feet of flexible meet- ing space. The convention center is within walking distance of more than 2,000 guest rooms. An additional 700 rooms are with/n two miles. Hotels with meet- Lng facilities near the convention center include the 308-room Hilton/Ontario Airport, with 14,000 square feet of meeting space; the 340-room Double- Rising above the Inland Empire cities of Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario, the San Bernarclino Mountains provide a scenic backdrop--and an icleal spot for pre- or post-meeting day trips. tree/Ontario, with 24,000 square feet of space for groups of up to 2,000; the 299- room Ontario Airport Marriott, with meeting space for groups of up to 725; and the 150-room Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites, with meeting space for up 110. InnSuites, with 150 guest rooms, has three large meeting rooms and six boardroom suites. Country Side Suites Ontario and Country Inn by Ayers each offer meeting space for up to 300 peo- ple. Country Suites by Carlson, Resi- dence Inn by Marriott and Good Nite Inn all have meeting space for small groups. Nearby, the 184-room Radis- son/Diamond Bar-Ontario offers meet- lng space for up to 200 people, and the 174-room Holiday Inn/Monrovia has meeting space for up to 400 people. POMONA: MEET ME AT THE FAIR Pomona is 15 minutes from the On- tario airport and about 35 minutes from downtown Los Angeles. The 487-acre Fairplex in Pomona is the. home of the Los Angeles County Fair and the host of more than 300 other events every year. Combined, those events draw more than 3 million people a year to Pomona. The Fairplex's exhibit halls provide from 33,000 to 105,000 square feet of col- tram-free space and can be used in vari- ous combinations; parking is available for 45,000 vehicles. At the Fairplex en- trance, meeting planners will find the 247-suite Sheraton Suites Fairplex, which offers 11,000 square feet of meet- lng space in seven meeting rooms. Life in Pomona, just 15 minutes from the Ontario Airport, is also doral- nated by two academic institutions, Pomona College and California State Polytechnic University. The 84-room Kellogg West Convention Center & Ho- tel on the Cai Poly/Pomona campus provides meeting facilities for up to 500 people, including 16 conference rooms and a team-building ropes course. The nearby 289-room Shilo Hilltop Suites & Conference Complex offers 11 meeting rooms and a convention center that can accommodate up to 500. Meanwhile, the Shilo Inn/Diamond Bar-Pomona offers 162 guest rooms and meeting space for up to 125 people. An academic atmosphere is also ap- parent in Claremont, a New England- style town in the San Gabriel Moun- tains just north of Pomona. The city is anchored by the Claremont Colleges, founded more than 100 years ago and known for their strong programs in the arts and sciences. Set against the moun- tains, the historic Padua Hills Theatre can accommodate up to 250 meeting at- tendees. Hotels with meeting space in- clude the 270-room Claremont Inn Hotel & Conference Center, with meeting space for up to 400. The 124-room Ra- mada Inn, the 62-room Howard Johnson and the 50-room Claremont Travelodge provide rooms for small meetings. TEMECULA: NEW OLD WEST CHARM The scenic Temecula Valley, twenty miles inland from the Pacific and halfway between Los Angeles and San Diego, is home to 15 wineries. The city of Temecula has in recent years re- stored its Old Town to look as it did in ASSOCIATION NEwS/MARCH 2001 DESTINATION: iNLAND TO THE MOUNTAINS the days of the Wild West. Rustic streets and wooden boardwalks are lined with more than 640 antique shops and art galleries. The vineyards and wineries offer a wide variety of tours and group activities. The Thornton Winery features champagne, jazz con- certs, an outdoor patio area that seats 350 people and indoor meeting facili- ties for groups of up to 80 people. Temecula hotels with meeting facili- ties include the 80-room Temecula Creek Inn, a sprawling resort that over- looks the valley and offers 27 holes of golf. Tlae inn's 2,788-square-foot confer- ence center can accommodate up to 284 people. The inn is undergoing renova- tions that will add 50 guest rooms and a separate 4,000-square-foot banquet and meeting building. The 176-suite Embassy Suites/Temec- ula features more than 3,200 square feet of meeting space for groups of up to 200 people. The 90-room Days Inn and the 70-room Ramada inn each provide 500 square feet of meeting space. SAID c? Circle 280 on Rapid Response Form Meeting planners can also choose the 133-room Pala Mesa Resort in near- by Fallbrook, with championship golf as well as 6,000 square feet of meeting space for groups of up to 200 people, or the Temecula Meeting Center, with space for groups of up to 90 people. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS: DESERT CULTURE While the entire area is often called Palm Springs, it is in fact made up of eight distinct cities that line a 25-mile stretch of the old Route 66. All the towns share warm desert weather, mountain views and fine hotels and spas. The desert scenery of the Coachella Valley also includes a more modem-day element: golf courses. The area is just 100 miles east of Los Ange- les and can be reached by air at Palm Spring~ Regional Airport. Palm Springs sits at the base of Mount San Jacinto. The village will be forever linked to the glamour days of Hollywood, but it is not stuck in the past. While maintaining a cozy resort feeling, it is drawing in an increasing number of high-profile chefs and other top names in luxury hospitality. Meet- ing attendees may enjoy a ride on the Palm Springs Aerial Tramway, which reaches to the top of Mount San Jacinto and features new cable cars that re- volve as they ascend. You might say Palm Springs was made for meetings. Most of the resorts have made a point of providing top- notch meeting facilities. The Palm Springs Convention Center has 77,000 square feet of meeting space, 66,000 square feet of exhibit space and a 435- seat auditorium. Within easy walking distance of fashionable Palm Canyon Drive, the center is connected to the 410-room Wyndham/Palm Springs by an air-conditioned walkway. The Wyn- dham offers an additional 25,000 square feet of indoor meeting space, a 60,000-square-foot courtyard surround- ing the pool and sun deck, a 160-seat amphitheater and a view of the San Jac- into Mountains. Hotels within walking distance of the convention center inclUde the 260- room Palm Springs Hilton Resort, with 10 meeting rooms for groups of up to 768 people. The 165-room Palm Springs Marquis Conference Center and Resort has 17 meeting rooms, 30,000 square feet of exhibit space and two acres of outdoor event space. The 192-room Hy- att Regency Suites offers nine meeting ASSOCIATION NEWS/MARCH 2001 DESTINATION: INLAND TO ThE MOUNTAINS nia Poppy Reserve, Z000 acres dedicat- ed to protecting California's state flower. The Antelope Valley cities of Lancaster and Palmdale are an hour's drive from greater Los Angeles and of- fer meeting space for up to 800 people. The 233-room Essex House Hotel & Racquet Club in Lancaster is the Ante- lope Valley's largest hotel, with meet- ing facilities for up to 750 people. The hotel's Essex Convention Center offers 14,000 square feet of meeting space for groups of up to 800 people. Additional Lancaster hotels with meeting facilities include the 150-room Best Western An- telope Valley Inn & Conference Center, with meeting space for up to 400 peo- ple. The 144-room Desert Inn Hotel has meeting space for groups of up to 150. In Palmdale, the 153-room Holiday Inn/Palmdale offers meeting space for groups of up to 130, and the 135-room Ramada Irm/Palmdale has meeting space for up to 300. Southeast of Lan- caster in the Santa Clarita Valley, the Hyatt Valencia offers 244 guest rooms, 11 suites and 15,600 square feet of meeting space for groups of up to 625. In the Mojave high desert, pic- turesque Ridgecrest has its roots in Ternecula's balloon and wine festival brings the area's twin passions together each year. gold mining. Outdoor enthusiasts can take in Mount whitney, the highest point in the lower 48, and enjoy the lowest point in North America, a two- hour drive away in Death Valley Na- tional Park. For association gatherings, Ridgecrest has 55,000 square feet of pa_ .e_dena,s Newest .- ? ,With our re~qtly.~bmpleted n~ultianillion dollar:_- ~ renovatibh; the Sheratofi ?asadeha Hotel awaits your .arrival:for a;b£and n~:'ex-pede-n~d '.' ' ' :' ~ted'i~.the hear~bf~downtowq'Pasa~-e.n.a;.th[- .'~':~i~t~n Para'dena Hotel_e~tends ~ll'thr, :engUre:dn.~njUyable and memorable visit.- ..: ~ Your experience with-us~w be an except~ona one. · 317 beautifully ; appointed guestrooms · Club Level with Club Lounge · 2~ Hour Business Center · Lobby Concierge · The all-new Restaurant Soleil for an exceptional dining expedence · The newly re~iesigned Charlies Bar for relaxing · Lighted tennis courts · Exercise Facilities · Close to 12~000 square feet of meeting and banquet fad[itles · Only a short [2) block walk to trend-setting "Old Pasadena" for limitless dining, shopping and entertainment options Circle 283 on Rapid Response From meeting space for groups of up to 7,000 people. The Kerr-McGee Civic Center offers 17,000 square feet of meeting space and theater seating for up to 2,000 people. The Desert Empire Fair- ground has 34,000 square feet of meet- ing space for up to 4,500 people. Hotels with meeting facilities include the 163- room Carriage Inn, which can accom- modate groups of up to 200 people, and the 169-room Heritage Inn, with meet- ing space for up to 60 people. In Death Valley National Park, the 290-room Furnace Creek Inn & Ranch Resort was built in the 1920s and offers meeting space for groups of up to 175 people. The resort also boasts the world's lowest 18-hole golf course-- 214 feet below sea level. GETTINO YOUR KICKS While flying in is an option for trav- eling to many of these cities, the drive is often half the fun--with diverse scenery and many places to stop along the way. Once at their destinations, meeting at- tendees will enjoy ever-changing land- scapes and unique cultures. Going in- land to the mountains and deserts is a trip into America's history. · FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Big Bear Lake Resort Association Circle 217 on Rapid Response Form Claremont Chamber of Commerce Circle 218 on Rapid Response Form Lake Arrowhead Communities C of C Circle 219 on Rapid Response Form Lancaster Chamber of Commerce Circle 220 on Rapid Response Form Ontario Convention & Visitors Bureau Circle 221 on Rapid Response Form Palm Springs Desert Resorts CVB Circle 222 on Rapid Response Form Palmdale Chamber of Commerce Circle 223 on Rapid Response Form Pomona Economic Development Corp. Circle 224 on Rapid Response Form Ridgecrest Area CVB Circle 225 on Rapid Response Form Riverside Visitors & Convention Bureau Circle 226 on Rapid Response Form San Bernardino CVB Circle 227 on Rapid Response Form Temeenla Valley Chamber of Commerce Circle 228 on Rapid Response Form PHOTO CREDITS: Page 6 & 8: William G. Nar tshom/Photographic Compositions Pa~e/.~: Pala Mesa Resort Paste %2: Ann Shepphird; Inset: Association News Photos Pa~e ~L4: City of Temecula ASSOCIATION NEws/MARCH 2001 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 24, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of March, 2001. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report March / April 2001 Prepared By: Brian Guillot Reviewed By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: April 24, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Old Town Front Street, and Santiago Road will be signalized. The bridge construction is complete with only deck grinding, tubular handrail and joint seal items remaining. Final asphalt paving is complete on Front Street, Santiago Road and First Street. The traffic signal at the intersection of First Street / Santiago Road and Front Street is operational with the installation of the Old Town Series streetlights underway. Contractor is scheduled to complete channel grading and miscellaneous itams by the end of the April. Construction of the EMWD lift station continues. The bridge dedication ceremony is schedule for May 1, 2001. 2. Old Town Parking Lot This project will rehabilitate the Stampede parking lot. It includes resurfacing, landscaping, and Old Town Series lights. TruGreen began construction on the parking lot on October 2, 2000. Construction is complete with punch list items remaining. The parking lot dedication ceremony is schedule for May 1, 2001. 3. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restore the wetlands in the construction zone. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Median & Parkway work is complete. Restoration work commenced on 3/19/01. 4. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Mitigation The wetlands creation site located approximately 1 V2 mile east of the bridge project has been planted. The 120-day plant establishment period is complete. The five-year maintenance program continues. 5. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. The sound wall is complete. Landscaping and other miscellaneous repairs should be completed by the end of April. 6. Sports Park Pond Desiltation The project included the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of silt from the existing pond located along Rancho Vista Road. The project is complete. Notice of Completion was scheduled to go to Council on 04/10/01. R:\Mon~hlyActivityReport\CIP\2001 \March.doc 7. Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting Under this proj eot, new lights will be installed in all fields. The project is essentially complete. Adjustment of thc direction and retrofitting the fixtures remain. Field repairs are underway. Rain has delayed completion. 8. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road - Low-flow Cr°ssing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Via Montezuma. At the February 13,2001 meeting, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Terra-Cai Construction for the amount of $404,587.70 The City's Planning Department completed the CEQA process. Tom Dodson & Associates, an environmental consultant, has submitted the necessary applications for the permitting process. All permits were issued and construction has commenced. The project area was manually cleared prior to March 15, thc beginning of thc nesting season. The project was awarded to Terra-Cai Construction of Baldwin Park, California. All of thc agency approvals have been acquired. The contractor started work on 4/2/01 and will start the pavement rehabilitation of Via Montezuma the week of April 16. The entire project is scheduled to be completed by June 2001. 9. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase IH This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Construction modifications include a single story office space addition. Thc contract was awarded to T&M construction with a bid amount of $600,000.00. Construction has begun with the demolition of existing structures. 10. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road fi.om Plo Pico to Dartolo Road and re-landscape the medians from Dc Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavement rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to Plo Pico). City Council awarded the project on 3/6/01 to R.J. Noble with a bid amount of $1,266,140.80. The Notice to Proceed was issued for April 19, 2001. 11. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. The project was advertised for bids and bids were opened on March 6, 2001. City Council awarded the project on March 27, 2001, to KEC Engineering. The pre-construction meeting was held April 10, 2001, with thc Notice To Proceed issued on April 16, 2001. Construction has begun with the demolition of existing facilities. 12. Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program A grant award in the amount of $140,870.00 was obtained to replace incandescent traffic signal lamps with Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamps. Under this program, all traffic signal lamps in the City of Temecula will be replaced with the energy efficient, long lasting LED lamps. The City will recover its matching costs in energy savings in two to three years. Bids were opened on March 6, 2001. The contract was awarded to Republic Electric at the March 27,2001, City Council meeting in the amount of $368, 714. A pre-consU'uction meeting was held on April 18, 200 l. Consmction is scheduled to begin the week of 04/23/01. 2 R: \MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2001 \March .doc PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita Road and Stoncwood Drive. City Council awarded thc construction contract to DBX, Inc. on April 10,2001, in the amount of$132,000. Construction is anticipated to begin thc first of May. 2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Areas to be rehabilitated were identified, and plans and specifications are complete. Bids were opened on April 10,2001, with ILl Noble the apparent low bidder. The project is expected to be awarded at the April 24 City Council meeting. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by thc designer, City staff has elected to complete the design in-house. Anticipated design completion is scheduled for June 2001. 2. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed about a month because hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval. Staffwill be using an appraiser to assist in thc preparation &the real estate appraisal report. The project is funded for design only at this time. 3. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center and The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. 4. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. Design is in process and appraisals are due at the end of the April. 5. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. Work is being 3 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2001 \March.doc coordinated with design of the library project. All utility issues are being addressed. 90% design plans were submitted to the City for review. Staff will begin contacting property owners to discuss driveway revisions and new easements. Potholing of utilities has been performed along Pauba to determine elevations of existing lines. 6. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The project is currently undergoing final plan check review. The project is scheduled to bid in late April. 7. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide additional traffic lanes. Design of the project began in September 2000. Design will take six months. The bridge widening will include four additional lanes. Provisions for a trail route across the bridge are also being considered. The 30% plan submittal was received and staff is reviewing the project design. 8. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design committee decided upon the layout of the 25-yard x 25-meter pool at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. The City and TVUSD reviewed the first design submittal from RJM Design Group, consultants, and the corrected plans were received on March 21,2001. Staff is completing the final review during the month of April. The project requires Division of State Architect (DSA) review and approval. The project is scheduled to begin this July pending DSA approval. 9. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one mile of sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Preliminary design is complete. Plans have been submitted to utilities for their review. 1st plan check and constructability review underway. 10. Pavement Management System- Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of various streets in the City for FY 2000-01. A list of streets has been selected and staff is currently preparing the contract specifications. Additionally, the consultant will update the Pavement Management System Program (PMS) for the City. The scope of services includes the evaluation of certain roads that need rehabilitation. A geoteehnical consultant has been selected and staff is now negotiating the professional services agreement. 11. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left mm from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. The field survey is complete. The in-house design, including the preparation of the base maps is underway. Coordination with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State Route at this location. Project will be processed as a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. 12. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I- 15 northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. A consultant has completed a final striping plan. The City applied for an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans to do the striping. Caltrans is reviewing. 4 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\ClP\2001 \March.doc 13. Overland Drive Extension/Murrieta Creek Bridge This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. Thc project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Mun-icta Creek to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), the designer, is working on the final version of the alignment study & report. It is to be submitted to the City at the end of April. 14. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle md Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. Preliminary utility research and data gathering is underway. O'Malley Engineering Corporation is providing the design survey which is scheduled to be completed by the end of thc month. Once data is received from consultant, staff will begin design with completion scheduled for the end of May. 15. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets during 2001. A list of streets has been selected and staff is currently preparing the contract documents. 16. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdcz. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 17. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk and landscaping along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 18. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. Thc design is progressing on schedule. The architect started on the final drawings after the committee completed its design and development meetings. The State Librarian is holding Public Hearings that include all agencies to develop thc guidelines for thc approved Bond measure. Letters were sent to all the utilities requesting service information. Utility services construction is being coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II project. 19. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs in the La Serena area and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Plans and specifications are 95% complete. 20. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at Wolff Valley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 5 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\200 l \March.doc 21. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construct!on of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 22. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits ofthis project in light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. 23. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed some minor striping and signal adjustments that improved traffic movement through the intersection. 6 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2001 \March.doc ILl LLI I'-'- LL o MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: April 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - March, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of March, 200t: I. SIGNS A, Total signs replaced 66 B. Total signs installed 51 C. Total signs repaired 1 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 5 II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons 3,856 55 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 156 RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement -0- VII. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 120 New and repainted legends B. 1~047 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 25 t~477 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 39 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 56 service order requests for the month of February, 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 85 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 2001 was $ 33,227.00 compared to $ 49,t50.00 for the month of February, 2001. Account No. 5402 $ 24,327.00 Account No. 5401 $ 7,850.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ 1,050.00 Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (tiP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) JerryAlegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March, 2001 DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST DATE OF WORK SIZE ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE. L L CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Date: MARCH, 2001 CITYWIDE RAIN CLEAN-UP REMOVE DEBRIS FROM STREETS, SWEEP STREETS, REPAIR RlP-RAP AND 15' OF SIDEWALK # 5402 TOTAL COST $10,942.00 GRADED DIRT ROADS IN SERVICE LEVEL Date: 03/05/01 SERVICE LEVEL "R" "R" AREAS GRADING OF DIRT ROADS # 999-5402 TOTAL COST $1,050.00 CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 03/13/01 VIA MONTEZUMA LOW FLOW MECHANICAL WEEK ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS AND TRASH CROSSING # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 5,000.00 Date: 03/21/01 NADA LANE WEED SPRAYING, WEED ABATEMENT AND DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM CHANNEL # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 2,850.00 CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING viARGARITA AT RANCHO VISTA REMOVE AND REPLACE 4 UNDER-THE- Date: 03/19/01 SIDEWALK DRAINS # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 9,640.00 Date:03/01/01 PASEO DE LAS OLAS REMOVED AND REPLACED 373 S.F. OF THREE LOCATIONS SIDEWALK; INCLUDES ROOT PRUNING # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 3,745.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5401 $ 7350.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 24,327.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT ~99-5402 $ 1,050.00 oo~ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 03/01/01 LIEFER ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/02/01 03/01/01 31385 CORTE TUNAS TREE REMOVAL 03/01/01 03/02/01 45673 CLUBHOUSE DEAD TREE 03/02/01 03/03/01 RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA DEBRIS PICK-UP 03/03/01 03/05/01 27025 WINCHESTER CR~EI( OIL SPILL 03/05/01 03/05/01 JOSEPH ROAD AT RITA WAY DEBRIS PICK-UP 0-3/05/01 03/05/01 31190 INDIAN SUMMER ROAD GRADE ROAD 03/05/01 03/05/01 30445 LA PRESA LOOP GRADE ROAD 03/05/01 03/05/01 29813 W1NDWOOD CIRCLE TREE REMOVAL 03/05/01 03/06/01 YNEZ AT VALLE JO PLUGGED C.M.P. 03/06/01 03/06/01 10851 DE PORTOLA ROAD ~OTHOLES 03/06/01 03/07/01 N. GENERAL KEARNY AT MARGARITA ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 03/07/01 03/08/01 INDIAN SUMMER ROAD GRADE ROAD 03/09/01 03/12/01 41501 REISI.ING COURT STORM DRAIN CONCERN 03/12/01 03/12/01 30310 VERONDA PLACE TREE TRIMM]lqG 03/12/01 03/12/01 40334 CALLE KATERINE P.C.C. PATCHING 03/12/01 03/12/01 39310 GREENWOOD LANE ROAD GRADING 03/12/01 03/12/01 43771 JOHN WARNER ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/12/01 03/13/01 PAUBA ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 03/13/01 03/13/01 39120 PALA VISTA ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/13/01 03/14/01 NICHOLAS AT N. GENERAL KEARNY PLYWOOD ON SIDEWALK 03/14/01 03/14/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT CALLE BAHIA VISTA TRENCH FAILURE 03/14/01 03/15/01 MARGARITA ROAD AT DARTOLA TEMP R-1 's 03/15/01 03/14/01 29700 MIRA LOMA POTHOLES 03/14/01 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED RECEIVED 03/14/01 41588 BIG SAGE cOURT TREE REMOVAL 03/14/01 03/15/01 MARGARITA ROAD AT DARTOLA TEMP R-1 03/15/01 03/19/01 42060 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA TREE REMOVAL 03/19/01 03/19/01 LA SERENA AT WALCOTT LANE DEBRIS REMOVAL 03/19/01 03/21/01 30798 CANTERF1ELD DRIVE BROKEN DRA]]'q 03/21/01 03/21/01 41588 BIG SAGE COURT TREE REMOVAL 03/21/01 03/22/01 CALLE PII~A COLADA AT N. GENERAL KEARNY OIL SPILL 03/23/01 03/23/01 SANTIAGO ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/23/01 03/23/01 UklqCNO CALll~ORNIA ROAD & 1-15 NAILS 0323/01 03/26/01 OVERLAND EAST OF JEFFERSON SAND SPILL 03/26/01 03/27/01 OVERLAND AT I-I 5 GRAFFITI 03/27/01 03/27/01 LONG RIDGE DRIVE AT ROCK BLUFF SIGN 03/27/01 03/28/01 TUOLUMNE AT DEER MEADOWS COUCH 03/28/01 03/28/01 45456 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE CATCH BASIN REPAIR 03/28/01 03/29/01 22086 WINCHESTER CREEK CATCH BASIN QUESTIONS 03/29/01 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 39 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 03/01/01 CITYWIDE "RAINTM REPA]RPOTHOLES 52 TEMP A.C. 03/02/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" REPAIR POTHOLES 40 TEMP A.C. 03/05/01 VukRGARITA AT DE PORTOLA OVERLAY POTHOLES 875 6 03/06/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" REPAIR pOTHOLES 46 TEMP A.C. 03/06/01 JEI~'t.'EI~SON AT DEL RIO ~EPAIR POTHOLES 9 TEMP A.C. 03/08/01 41750 RIDER WAY REPAIR POTHOLES 16 TEMP A.C. 03/08/01 CITYWIDE REPA1R POTHOLES 91 2 03/09/01 CITYWIDE REPAIR POTHOLES 70 2 03/12/01 JEIq~'ERSON AT CHERRY REMOVE & REPLACE 106 3 03/13/01 28165 JEFFERSON ~,EMOVE & REPLACE 174 6.5 03/14/01 28165 JEI~I~'ERSON REMOVE & REPLACE 200 6.5 03/15/01 qICHOLAS AND WALCOTT REMOVE & REPLACE 66 2 03/19/01 28165 JEFFERSON REMOVE & REPLACE 203 6.5 03/20/01 MIRA LOMA DRIVE OVERLAYS 327 3 03/21/01 NOCHOLAS ROAD EAST OF JOSEPH ROAD OVERLAYS 850 4 03/22/01 MIRA LOMA DRIVE OVERLAYS 385 3.5 03/26/01 DE PORTOLA - PIO PICO TO JEDEDIAH SMITH OVERLAYS & BERM 42 3.5 03/28/01 30000 YNEZ ROAD DOWN SPOUT 280 6.5 03/28/01 SANTIAGO AND C STREET REPAIR POTHOLE 24 ~. TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3~856 TOTAL TONS 55 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 __~ ~ ~ BATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03/01/01 MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD (4 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 30 S.F. OF 03/01/01 CALLE ARAGON AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAI~ FI'I I 03/07/01 VIA MEJIA AT McCABE REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAIqq ri 03/0701 McCABE AT CAMINO ALAGON REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFIq 11 03/07/01 McCABE AT MEADOWS ?,EMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFiq t'l 03/07/01 PlO PICO AT CALLE REDONDELA REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAI~'t"[I 1 03/08/01 31067 csAMINo VERDE REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAIq~'Irl 03/08/01 VIA PUERTA AT CAMINO VERDE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF 03/08/01 40486 WINCHESTER REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAIqq I 1 03/08/01 40480 WINCHESTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/14/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT CALLE TAJO REMOVED 199 S.F. OF GRAFFH'I 03/16/01 fftARGARITA PARK REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAIqqTI 03/16/01 BUTTERF1ELD STAGE ROAD N/O RANCHO CALIFORNIA REMOVED 112 S.F. OF GRAt"? [1 03/16/01 TEMECUI~.. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/16/01 31000 CORTE PRIEGO REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAI~'Iq:I l 03/19/01 AVENIDA DE LA REINA REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFIqTI 03/19/01 MARGARITA AT YUKON REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFIq'I I 03/19/01 LA SERENA AT CALLE PlflA COt. ADA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFfiti 03/19/01 LA SERENA AT CAMINO CORTO REMOVED 22 S.F. OF GRP&'Iq 1'1 03/19/01 LA SERENA WEST OF CAM1NO CORTO REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/1901 LA SERENA AT MARGARITA REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/26/01 O~ BRIDGE AT 1-15 REMOVED 917 S.F. OF GRP&'Frl 1 TOTAL S.F. GRAFFI'FI REMOVED 1~477 TOTAL LOCATIONS 25 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03/05/01 SANTIAGO ROAD AT MARGARITA ROAD INSTALLED TYPE 1 ARROW 03/08/01 41750 RIDER WAY INSTALLED 70 L.F. RED CURB 03/09/01 RIDER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST REPAINTED 24 L.F. RED CURB 190 L.F. DOUBLE YELLOW, 150 L.F. LANE 03/13/01 RANCHO VISTA (TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL) INSTALLED LINE, 2 ARROWS 240 L.F. LANE LINE, 4 ARROWS, 90 03/15/01 RANCHO VISTA (TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL) INSTALLED DOUBLE YELLOW 03/16/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA INSTALLED 53 L.F. RED CURB 03/19/01 RANCHO VISTA ROAD EAST OF MARGARITA REPAINTED 113 LEGENDS 03/20/01 HEITZ LANE AT VINTAGE CIRCLE NST,~I.I.ED 230 L.F. OF DOUBLE YELLOW TOTAL NEW & REPAINTEO LEGENDS 120 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 1~047 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03~6/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 03/07/01 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 50 CATCH BASINS 03/12~) 1 AREA 84 CLEANED & CHECKED 30 2ATCH BASINS 03/16/01 AREA g4 CLEANED & CHECKED 17 CATCH BASINS 03/19/01 AREA g4 CLEANED & CHECKED 40 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 156 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03/05/01 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS AT HEITZ TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 03~)7/01 CALLE BARCALDO AT CORTE ALMONTE TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 03/12/01 RANCHO VISTA AT MARGARITA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL ILO.W. TREES TRIMMED $ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MARCH, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03/01/01 YNEZ AT MOTOR CAR PARKWAY REPLACED ~.-11 & TYPE K 03/01/01 :~AUBA WEST OF MARGARITA REPLACED CARSONITE 03/01/01 DIAZ ROAD REPI~CED BUS STOP SIGN 03/06/01 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF MARGARITA REPLACED 5 R261-81 7 R-26 03/06/01 MEADOWS AT PAUBA REPLACED R-I FADED 03/07/01 AREA #2 (SEE DAILY FOR LOCATIONS) REPLACED 28 R-1 03/08/01 PlO PICO AT MARGARITA REPLACED R-2 "45" T.C. 03/08/01 kRGO AT RANCHO VISTA REPLACED R-1 T.C. 03/08/01 PAUBA AT VIA CERA REPLACED R-1 T.C. 03/08/01 ~.VENIDA ALVARADO AT DIAZ ROAD REPLACED R-1 T.C. 03/08/01 SANTA CECILIA AT COSMIC REPLACED 5 R- 1-2 FADED 02/12/01 KLARER AT CALLE KATERINE REPLACED R-I FADED 03/12/01 CALLE MEDUSA AT ENFIELD REPLACED R-1 FADED 03/14/01 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT SPY GLASS INSTALLED 2 W54A 03/14/01 ~A PAZ AT YNEZ REPLACED R2 35 03/15/01 LA PAZ AT YNEZ REPLACED R2 45 03/15/01 CORONADO NORTH OF YNEZ REPLACED R2 45 03/15~)1 TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL REPLACED ~.-18 03/15/01 WINCHESTER AT FARMER BOYS REPLACED R-7 TYPE K 03/16/01 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS 03/19/01 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT LEENA REPLACED R-1 T.C. 03/20/01 HE1TZ Ia~qE AT VINTAGE CIRCLE INSTALLED 16 R.P.M. 03/23/01 RIESLING COURT INSTALLED I W-53 03/26/01 WINCHESTER - DIAZ TO JEFH~RSON INSTALLED 12 R-26 03/27/01 WINCHESTER- DIAZ TO 3EI'~'I~RSON INSTALLED 10 R-26 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 03/28/01 MARGARITA NORTH OF STONEWOOD INSTALLED CIP SIGN 03/28/01 JEH~ERSON AT OVERLAND AND CHERRY INSTALLED 2 CIP SIGNS 03/29/01 RANCHO VISTA AND MEADOWS PARKWAY REPLACE 1 R-lA "DAMAGED" 03/29/01 PAUBA WEST OF CORTE VALLASA INSTALLED TYPE N- Y1ELD 1 03/29/01 PAUBA WEST OF CORTE VALLASA INSTALLED 2 CARSONITES 03/29/01 ,~RONT AT 79 SO. INSTALL 1 CARSONITE 03/29/01 FRONT AT 79 SO. INSTALL 3 TYPE Qs M/SSING 03/29/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE REPAIR 1 CITY LllvtIT SIGN TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 66 TOTAL SIGNS INST~I J~F~D SI TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED I