HomeMy WebLinkAbout042396 CC Agenda in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to
a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting
128 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
APRIL 23, 1996 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue
all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All
meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Next in Order:
Ordinancep No. 9E-M
Resolution: No. q -47
CALL TO ORDER:Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding
invocation:Reverend Steven Leinhos, New Community Lutheran Church
Flag Salute:Councilmember Birdsall
ROLL CALL:Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PROCLAMATIONS
PRESENTATIONS/Certificates of Appreciation
Arts Council of the Temecula Valley
Rancho Temecula Area Woman's Club
Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club
Proclamation - National Nurses' Month
Presentation by Citizens for a Safer Temecula (Placed on the
agenda at the request of Councilman Stone)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or are listed on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item n= listed
on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled
out and filed with the City Clerk.
R:\Ager,da\042390
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPOM
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 0) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of
the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
1Standard Ordinance Adogtion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2AQ12roval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996.
3Resolution A1212rovina List of Dem@
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
R:@e@\042396 2
4City Attorney Services
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1Retain Peter Thorson as City Attorney for the City of Temecula;
4.2Terminate the Agreement for City Attorney Services with Burke, Williams & Sorensen
Attorneys dated September 26, 1996;
4.3Enter into an Agreement for City Attorney Services With Richards, Watson and
Gershon Attorneys at Law.
5Purchase of Radio System Eguogment
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1Approve the purchase of City Radio Equipment from Comtronix of Hemet for a total
cost of $17,265.37.
6Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
7Accept the Offers of Dedication for Public Street and Utility Purposes along the Walcott
Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY
PURPOSES
8Sewer Aareement with Mervyn's for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester oad at
Interstate Route 1 5. Bridae Wedenona and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No.
PW94-21
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1Approve the Agreement and Grant of Easement, and authorize the Mayor to execute
both documents.
R:\Agerida\042396 3
9Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and S12ec*f6catoons for the Interim
Traffic S*gnal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive -
Prowect No. PW96-03
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1Approve the construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW96-03, Traffic
signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive.
10Proaram Supplement No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aod Prooects
for SR 15 and Overland Drove overcrossing Proiect (PW 95-1 1)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(001), SR
15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING
1 1Proaram Supg)lement No. 002 to the Local Aaency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects
for SR 1 5 and Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project (PW 95-12)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(002),
SR 1 5/RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
R:@endo\042396 4
1 2Proaram Supplement No. 008 to the Local Agency/State Aareement for Federal-Awd Proiects
for the Barrier Rail at Front Street and empire Creek (PW95-1 7)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-5459(007), BARRIER
RAIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK
1 3Award of Contract for the Rancho Calefornia/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5. Proiect
No. PW95-25
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1Award a contract for the construction of the Rancho California/Santa Cecilia
Sidewalk Project No. 5, project No. PW95-25 to Gosney Development, for
$27,430.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
13.2Authorize the City manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $2,743.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
14Aareement Regarding Prol2osed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of
Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Pala Road Bridoe over Temecula Creek
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1Approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification
No. 5-004-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of
Temecula, and direct the Director of Public works to sign said Agreement.
15Construction Cooperative Aareement, State of California, County of Riverside, Cot@
Temecula - 1-1 5/SR 79(51
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1Approve the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the State of California,
County of Riverside and City of Temecula, Route 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange South
Junction, Agreement No. 8-932, 08303-350510.
R:@enda\042396 5
1 6Authorize Cost Participation with Temecula Valley Unified School District for the Installation
of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Winchester and Roripauah Roma
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1Authorize participation in the cost of a Traffic Signal Installation with Temecula
Valley Unified School district to be constructed as a portion of the Winchester road
Widening Project in the amount of two-thirds of the estimated cost to design and
construct the signal.
1 7Release Gradina Security for Exi2ort of Soils
(Located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road at Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1Authorize release of the Grading Security for Export of soils materials from the
Southeast corner of Margarita Road at Winchester Road to several sites along the
northerly side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Nicolas Road;
17.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
1 8Approval of Aareement Reaardina Transfer of Drainage Facilities to Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District (Located at Ynez Road northerly of Motor Car
Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1Approve the agreement between Advanced Cardiovascular Systems ("ACS"), the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ('DISTRICT"), and
the City of Temecula ('CITY') for transfer of Drainage Facilities to the DISTRICT;
18.2Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
18.3Direct the City Clerk to attest thereto and to transmit the document to the DISTRICT
for final processing through the Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
1 9Parcel Map No. 27987-1 (Located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway
and Country Glen Way - Vail Ranch Commercial Ctr.)
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1Approve Parcel Map No. 27987-1 subject to the conditions of approval, and the
Developer providing proof of payment of property taxes and any special assessments
prior to release of the map for recordation.
R:@endakO42396 a
20Accel2tance of Drainage Easement in Portion of Tract 22916-3 and Ouitcla*m to Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
(Located Northwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND
AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (PORTION OF LOTS 62
AND 63 IN TRACT NO. 22916-3)
21Amendment to Staff Report: Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Soanal at
the Intersection of Maraarota road and State Route 79 (South), Promect No. PW95-15
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1Appropriate $45,000 in Signal Mitigation Funds from the Development Impact Fund
to the Capital Improvement Project Fund.
22Sul2l2ort of AB 3382
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING
AB 3382 WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND
ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING,
OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEE@
OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
R:\AgerideNO42396 7
COMMtjNfTY@SERVICES@@DISTRICT@MEETING@@.,@@@'..",@,
Next in Order:
Ord*nancee No. CSD 96-M
Resolutoonw No. CSD 9E-M
CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to
Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the re@
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996.
2Release of Bond for Tract 25004-1. Barclay Estates
(Located at Seraphina Road at Jons Place)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the
construction of the TCSD slopes and landscaped area within Tract No. 25004-1,
Barclay Estates.
R:\Agend*%042396 8
3Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc.
(Located on Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials bond for the construction of Nicolas
Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc.
4Award of Contract for Construction of Sports Park Creek Restoration (Project No. PW95-
10CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1Approve the plans and specifications for he construction of the Sports Park Creek
Restoration Project PW95-10 CSD.
4.2Award a construction contract in the amount of $195,059.00 to R.K. Allen
Landscape Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract.
4.3Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency of $19,505.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:@@\042396
TEMECULA@REDEVELOPMENT@AGENCY@MEETING::,@..,.".
Next in Order
Ordinance: No. RDA 96-01
Resolution No. RDA 96-11
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item =
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2Great Temecula Tractor Race
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Consider a request for sponsorship of the 1996 Great Temecula Tractor Race.
R:@@\042396 10
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
RECESS TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD-
TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT Fl ANCING AUTHORITY
R:\Agertda\042396 1 1
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE:COMMUNITY@ FACILITIES@ DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY.,@"...,.,
Next Ordere
Resolution No.0 No. FA 96-02
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item n= listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request
To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address,
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996.
RECESS TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD
TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
R:Vkgonda\042396 1 2
... .... ..
.... ..... ..
...... ..... .
..@OtO::TOWN@@WESTSIDE@@IMPROVEMENT@@@AUTHORITY@...."..'.'.
...
................ ...
... ................
.. ......... ..... .....
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item = listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request
To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address,
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn the meeting.
R: a%042390 13
RECONVENE TO A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
Mayor Karel L*ndemans Presiding
23Funancinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Syl2ass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
23.2That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF
ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
23.3That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING
THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
RECESSTO EXECUTE THE JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE FINANCING AUTHORITY
Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall Presidinci
24Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Conidor - Old
TowntWestside Improvement Authority
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/VVESTSIDE IMPRO\IEMENT AUTHORITY
R:@nda\042396 14
25Financinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING
MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND
ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS
25.2That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT
OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
25.3That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF
OLD TOWNIWEST COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE
DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
OF THE DISTRICT
25.4That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE
NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD
TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
OF THE DISTRICT
R:@rida\042396 Is
25.5That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL
ELECTION
RECESS TO OPEN BALLOTS
25.6That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS
OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX
LIEN
25.7Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL
TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN
AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
ADJOURN THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETINGS
Next regular meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:@anda\042396 is
COUNCIL BUSINESS
26Starlight Ridge - Traffic Stu@d
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1Support the findings of Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study.
27Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Proiect, Proiect No, PW94-10
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1Conduct a hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public
comments and close the hearing;
27.2Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain
proceeding so as to acquire the Property.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
(SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT
CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT)
(Note:This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council.)
27.3Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously;
27.4Approve a warrant in the amount of $10,460.00, payable to the Clerk of the Superior
Court for the deposit required to be made with Court.
27.5Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
28Memorandum of Understanding Conceminci Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Proiect Services,
Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1Approve the Memorandum of Understanding concerning Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin
Project Services, Inc. For authorizing the payment of development fees at a specified
level and directing the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
R;@anda\042396 17
29City Commissioner Term Limits and Monthly Compensation
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
TERM LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
29.2Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California.
R:@erideNO42390
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLMATION
the month of May is designated annually as National Nurses'
Month, and
WHEREAS, The nursing profession represents one of America's -reat
ID
national resources; and
WHEREAS, each year nurses contribute to the betterment of their
communities through their competence, efficiency, and dedication to healing; and
WHEREAS, nurses are a valued and vital part of this community,
contributing greatly to the health and well-being of our citizens as they give
Generously of their time, energy and compassion;
NO W , 'ILREFORE, I, Karel F. Lindemans, on behalf of the City
Council of the Cityof Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be
UNATIONAL NURSES MONTH"
in the City of Temecula, and encourage the citizens to recognize the nurses of the
Temecula Valley and especially of the Ramona Visiting Nurses Association and
Hospice when the nation is observing National Nurses Month.
IN S @EREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 22nd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans,
Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
CitTof Temecula
Certificate of Appreciation
Presented in appreciation and gratitude on be]Lalf of the
ci@ens of the City of Tem@
To:
olde
For their generous participation in funding and purchasing a piano ]Leyboar4l ins@ent
to be used and enjoyed b-y the citizens and organizations who use the Com-muni@
Recreation Center facilities.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this
23rd day of April, 1996
@l F. Lindemans,
Ma-yor
June S. Gree]L, CMC
CiiT Cler]L
CitTof Temecula
Certificate of Appreciation
Presentea in appreciation ana gratitu(le on behalf of the
cii6e,ns of the CiiT of Temecula
To:
@4a
For their generous participation in funding ana purchasing a piano ]Leyboara instrument
to be used ana enjoyed by the citizens ana organizations who use the Community
Recreation Center facilities
In Witness @ereof, I have hereunto
affixea my h&ua ana official seal this
23ra day of Apra, 1996
@l F. Lindemans,
@or
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
CifTof Temecula
Certificate of Appreciafion
Presentea in appreciation ana gratitude on belkalf of the
ci@e,ns of the City of Temecx&
To:
&, .0
For their generous p@cipafion in funding ana purchasing a piano keyboard instrument
to be usea ana enjoyed b. the citizens ana organizations who use the CommunitT
Recreation Center facilities.
In Witnesii Whereof, I have hereunto
d&ea my hana &na official seal this
23rd day of Apra, 1996
@l F. Lindem&us,
Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
. ITEI\4 1
ITEI\4 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD APRIL 9, 1996
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:45 PM. It was moved
by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, real property located at
28535 Pujol Street (APN 922-054-004) and 28545 Pujol Street (APN 922-054-005), Temecula.
The negotiating parties are: Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Elizabeth Otto. Under
negotiation will be the price and terms of payment for the real property.
2. Conference with Legal Counsel concerning existing litigation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a). The title of the litigation is: Strachota Insurance Company v. City of
Temecul . et, al.
3. The Council will consider the appointment/employment of a person for the position of City
Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall and Councilmember Stone
absent. Mayor Lindemans recessed the closed session 6:37 PM.
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Karel
F.Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Jeremy Swizek, World Harvest Outreach.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Cub Scout Pack 302.
Minutes\040996 -1- 04/16/96
Cety Counc*l M4nutes At)ril 9. 1996
ri C)SFD SESSION REPORT
City Manager Bradley reported that the City Council reaffirmed the appointment of Peter
Thorson as City Attorney and directed staff to prepare a new agreement with the law firm of
Richards, Watson and Gershon, to be placed on the City Council Agenda of April 23, 1996.
City Attorney Thorson reported that the City Council authorized the defense and indemnification
of City employees named in the law suit filed by Strachota Insurance Company. He reported
the City employees will be represented by Richard J. Schneider of the law firm Daley & Heft
and he would represent the City.
PRESENTATIONSI
PROCLAMATIONS
Don Jenkins, Cub Master of Cub Scout Pack 302, spoke regarding the meaning of the 'Arrow
of Light' award, explaining it is Cub Scoutings highest award.
Mayor Lindemans presented the following cub scouts with a certificate of achievement for
attaining the 'Arrow of Light' award: Ryan Loucks, Kyle Odell, Jesse Minor, Trevor Moran,
Edward Benson, Ryan Hall, Joshua Smith and Doug Bennett.
Mayor Lindemans awarded the students chosen to represent the City as Sister City Exchange
Students a Special Achievement Award. They are as follows:
Students traveling to Nakayama, Japan Students Traveling to Voorburg, Holland
Kelly Hagberg Tyler Glen Lilah Mavis
Peter Femia Ellen Warkenfine Brooke Bensen
Stephanie Slane Katie Lieberg Crystal Joe
Eric Ruggles Bekki Hoffman
Mayor Lindemans proclaimed Saturday, April 20, 1996 to be 'Health Fair Expo '96. Anne Cuss,
representing Inland Valley Regional Medical Center, thanked the Mayor for the proclamation and
described the many screenings and demonstrations that will be held in conjunction with this
event.
Alicia Ramirez, representing the Center for Employment Training - Federally Funded Job
Training, gave a presentation to the City Council and public regarding the services that the
Center provides and invited the City Council and public to visit the Center.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Joseph R. Terrazas, 31160 Lahonton Street, requested an explanation of the bond financing
discussed at the previous meeting. City Manager Bradley stated that the initial set of hearings
that set both Community Facilities Districts in place were held but details regarding this issue
will be heard at a future meeting.
Minutes\040996 -2- 04/15/96
C*tv Council Mbnutes At)ril 9. 1996
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Ford stated he attended a joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee Meeting
where recommendations were made regarding freeways and overcrossings, he said he will hold
his report until after the April 18, 1996 meeting when construction plans will be discussed.
Councilmember Roberts requested staff place a discussion of AB 3382 on the next agenda.
He also requested staff and the Council look into participation in the Riverside County Child and
Youth Summit to take place in May.
Mayor Lindemans expressed concern about the negative press coverage regarding the Border
Patrol check point in Temecula.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Roberts stated he would abstain on Item 2, since he did not attend that
meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve consent
Calendar Items 1-12 with Councilmember Roberts abstaining on Item No. 2.
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
1 . standard Ordinance Adogtion Procedmm
1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2.Approval of Minutes
2.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996.
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Minutes\040996 -3- 04/15/96
City Council Minutes ADfil 9. 1996
3.Resolution A12proving List of Dem@
3.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4.City Treasu='s Regort
4.1Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 29, 1996.
5.Release of Bonds for Maroarita Road Widening Improvemenla
(Located on Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way)
5.1Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds
posted in accordance with the Agreement between the City and the Margarita
Village Retirement Community, Inc., for the widening of Margarita Road between
Rancho California Road and La Serena Way;
5.2Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Contractor and Surety.
6.Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of Plans and Specifications for the FY95-
96 Concrete Repaors (Project No. PW96-06)
6.1Approve the construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW96-06, FY95-96
Concrete Repairs.
7.Award a Contract to Remove and Replace A.C. on Winchester Road, Public Works
Maintenance - Project No. PW95-96-21
7.1Award a contract to Nelson Paving and Sealing (NPG, Corp.), to remove and
replace A.C. for east and west bound traffic on Winchester Road between bridge
deck and Enterprise Circle South.
8.Contract Change Order No. 2 for Citywide A.C. Street Rel2air, Proiect No. PW95-M
8.1Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project
No. PW95-20, for additional A.C. overlays in the amount of $1,193.50.
Minutes%040996 -4- 04/15196
City Council Minutes At)ril S. 1996
9.Destruction of Records Request
9.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
10.Support of SB 1 590
10.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
SUPPORTING INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION OF A VALIDATING ACT IN
RESPONSE TO SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
VS. GUARDINO
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
11.Second Reading of Ordinance No. 96-06
11.1Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0019, ZONING AMENDMENT,
AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO DELETE THE
RETIREMENT ORIENTED HOUSING RESTRICTION, AMEND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREAS NO. 38 AND 40 AND DELETE
REFERENCES TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA
ROAD, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY
Minutes\040996 04/15/96
City Councol Minutes ADril 9. 1996
12.Second Readona of Ordinance No. 96-07
12.1Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION 10.24.080 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO EXCESSIVE ACCELERATION
RECESS
Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 7:35 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:17 PM
following the previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting, Redevelopment
Agency Meeting, Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meeting
and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
13.Planning Apgl*cation No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zonang Amendment) -
Chardonnay Hills
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Lindemans opened the public hearing at 8:20 PM.
Joseph D. Taylor, 41005 Montelena Circle, stated he is in favor of increasing the home
sizes however he is concerned about community improvements promised by the
developer. He expressed concern regarding landscaping and recreational facilities.
Brad Bassi, 32233 Chemin Laurent, spoke in favor of staff recommendation, but
expressed concern over the following areas: phasing, greenbelts, Butterfield Stage Road
and Mission Meadows Road connection and the second recreational facility. He stated
he is most concerned about the green belt area, since it is currently full of weeds and
silt and could cause future problems.
Mayor Lindemans closed the public hearing at 8:30 PM.
Councilmember Ford suggested staff facilitate a meeting with the homeowners and
developers to address these issues.
Minutes\040996 -6- 04/15/96
C@ty Councol Minutes April 9. 1996
It was moved by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to continue
the public hearing for one month with direction to staff to facilitate a meeting with the
applicants, staff and the homeowners to establish a time line for the various
improvements to include the scheduling of phases, greenbeits, Butterfield Stage Road
and Mission Meadows Road completions and completion of the second Recreation
Facility.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
14.Annexat*on Guidelines for the City of Temecula
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to continue
the public hearing to the meeting of May 14, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
Minutes\040996 -7- 04/15/96
Coty Council Monutes At)fil 9. 1996
ADJOUR MENT
it was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn at 8:37
PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmembers Birdsall and Stone absent.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\040996 -8- 04/15/96
ITEN4 3
RESOLUNON NO. 96-
ARESOLUTION OF THE CrrY COUNCIOL OF THE CrrY
OF A ALLOWING CERTAIN CLADIS AND
D S AS SET FORTH IN EXHIOBrr A
THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following cwms and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City @ager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $736,700.58.
Section 2. The City Clerk shau ce@ the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPRED, this 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos\103
STATE OF CALEFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SBDE) SS
CrrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at a regulir meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following rofl call vote:
AM: COUNCEL ERS:
NOES: COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSENT: COUNC ERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Resos\103 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
04/04/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 248,821.97
04/11/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 54,613.36
04/23/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 298,384.61
04/04/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 134,880.64
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/23/96 COUNCIL MEETING: $736,700.58
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKSI
001 GENERAL $ 115,900.10
100 GAS TAX 34,139.03
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 4,a45.53
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 79,775.74
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 5,066.29
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 587.25
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,895.03
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 391.79
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 92,792.17
280 RDA-CIP 241,819.74
300 INSURANCE 2,909.66
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 7,069.65
330 SUPPORTSERVICES 5,049.25
340 FACILITIES 6,133.71
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 $ 601,819.94
r'AYROLL:
001 GENERAL $83,098.60
100 GAS TAX 15,987.12
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 458.21
190 TCSD 23,378.42
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 625.33
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 697.14
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,369.68
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 394.91
280 RDA-CIP 2,440.31
300 INSURANCE 586.47
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,835.57
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 804.35
340 FACILITIES 2,204.53 134,880.64
TOTAL BY FUND: $736,700.58
PREPARED BY RETA JEAN WESTON
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
04/04/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: $ 248,821.97
04/11/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: 54,613.36
04/23/96 TOTALCHECKRUN: 298,384.61
04/04/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 134,880.64
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/23/96 COUNCIL MEETING: $736,700.58
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $ 115,900.10
100 GAS TAX 34,139.03
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 4,845.53
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 79,775.74
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 5,066.29
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 587.25
193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C 2,895.03
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 391.79
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 92,792.17
280 RDA-CIP 241,819.74
300 INSURANCE 2,909@66
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 7,069.65
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,049.25
340 FACILITIES 6,133.71
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 $ 601,819.94
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL $83,098.60
100 GAS TAX 15,987.12
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 458.21
190 TCSD 23,378.42
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 625.33
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 697.14
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,369.68
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 394.91
280 RDA-CIP 2,440.31
300 INSURANCE 586.47
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,835.57
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 804.35
340 FACILITIES 2,204.53 134,880.64
TAL BY FUND: $736,700.58
PREPAREDp4ETA
1, @/,M I HEREBY CERTIFYTHATTHE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
GENIE R@ERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT,
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13
04104/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 73,825.95
100 GAS TAX FUND 15,988.64
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 354.04
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 26,504.34
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 4,178.77
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 8 578.79
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,724.58
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 371.21
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 2,445.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 9,614.62
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP 101,764.50
300 INSURANCE FUND 992.65
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,208.24
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,240.01
340 FACILITIES 5,030.63
TOTAL 248,821.97
4OUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
Pl@4/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
YOUCkERi
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28444 03/29/96 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST WATER METER I PRKVIEW STATION 210-190-626-5804 7,095.00 7,095.00
28445 03/29/96 002269 MAX GILLIS BAND MUSIC-SPRING SWING DANCE 190-180-999-5301 800.00 800.00
28446 03/29/96 002276 AD ART ELECTRONIC SIGN DOW/ PAYMENT ON AUTO MALL SIGN 280-1530 100,000.00 100,000.00
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 12,982.87
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,741.92
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX @IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 29.55
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,909.45
655601 G4/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX [IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 93.57
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 84.43
655601 04iO4/96 000283 FIRSTAX ( IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 417.63
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX @IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 78.22
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 161.22
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 128.52
655601 04iD4/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 379.82
655501 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 122.53
6945601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 163.89
111 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,109.38
1 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 592.21
bo@601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 14.62
655501 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 830.63
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 21.68
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 23.48
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 86.28
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 14.75
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 76.29
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.44
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 78.46
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 26.62
655601 04/04/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 72.86 25,263.32
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 51.78
677537 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 9.57
677517 04/D4/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 64.01
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 5.00
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 8.50
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 4.90
677597 04104/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 3,461.30
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 100-2070 683.27
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 8.91
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 654.87
677591 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 17.57
@77;97 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 10.68
7 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDO) 000444 STATE 193-2070 98.78
-j7 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 17.07
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 31.29
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 38.17
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 92.35
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 25.10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALLPERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
677597 04/04/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 20.34 5,303.46
26449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-110-999-5230 411.57
28449 04/04/96 000680 A N S - T U S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-162-999-5230 84.98
28449 04/04/96 000680 A 0 S - T W S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-120-999-5230 677.50
28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 190-180-999-5230 166.65
28449 04/04/96 000680 A 9 S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-140-999-5230 644.07
28449 04/04/96 000680 A W S - T N S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-150-999-5230 50.01
28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 9 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 100-164-604-5230 775.06
28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 0 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-161-501-5230 115.28
28449 04/04/96 000680 A M S - T 9 S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-161-502-5230 115.27 3,041.39
28450 04/04/96 002158 A S A P SERVICES INC. STREET STRIPING PROGRAM 100-164-502-5410 928.60 928.60
28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AYP 001-2310 515.98
28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-2310 80.51
28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 4.18
28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 72.40
28451 04/04/95 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.14
28451 04iO4/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 2.44
28451 04/04/96 000116 A Y P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70
28451 04/04/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA PWT FOR APRIL 96 001-1180 9.75 707.10
28452 04iO4/96 001912 ALLMON, VYLANI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 312.00 312.00
28453 04/04/96 001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION MARCH COPIER SERVICE AGREEMENT 330-199-999-5217 217.18 217.18
26454 04/04/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 3/16 BARNETT 190-180-999-5118 288.96 288.95
2845; 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY HALL .340-199-999-5240 286.37
2845'j 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-5240 7.72
28455 04/04/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER - MAINT, YARD 100-164-601-5240 25.28 319.37
28456 04/04/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER HVAC/ELECT SRVCS/CRC 190-182-999-5250 906.99 906.99
26457 04/04/96 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY COMM PACKAGE:PUJOL ST 300-1655 575.00 575.00
28458 04/04/96 BENSEN, BROOKE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28459 04/04/96 000791 C P S R P C ANNUAL MEMB:S.NELSON 190-180-999-5226 130.00 130.00
4'6460 04/04/96 002274 C S U S FOUNDATION OTS SUMMIT '96:LEGGETT/4/22-25 001-170-999-5261 175.00 175.00
28461 04/04/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROVE/HINTERGARDT PARK 190-180-999-5415 957.30 957.30
28462 04/04i96 000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M CONFILCT RESO/' jOl-161-501-5261 79.00 79
26463 04/04/96 CASTRO, JUAN REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00
28464 04/04/96 002275 CATHEDRAL HILL HOTEL HOTEL:OTS SUMMT:LEGGET:4/22-25 001-170-999-5261 364.00 364.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
0"'14/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
vouchER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28465 04/04/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS:SPEED LIMIT 50 A 55 100-164-601-5244 395.17
28465 04/04/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS:35 ZONE AHEAD 100-164-601-5244 80.81 475.98
28466 04/04/95 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL LEASE PUT FOR TELE SYSTM 320-199-999-5391 34.04
28466 04/04i36 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL LEASE PUT FOR TELE SYSTM 320-2800 1,393.53 1,427.57
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 AAS 001-2330 39.75
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 AIS 190-2330 39.75
26487 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 001-2330 18.75
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 100-2330 47.75
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 800 AIS 190-2330 114.25
26467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 167.91
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330 58.19
28467 04iO4/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 165-2330 6.47
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE I ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 89.64
28467 04/04/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 6.47 588.93
28468 04/04/96 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING FOR CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 135.00 135.00
99 04/04/96 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50
264'@0 04/04/96 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS SUPPLY 100-164-601-5218 5.28 5.28
28471 04/04/96 000155 DAVLIN BROADCAST OF COUNCIL MEETINGS 001-100-999-5250 800.00 800.00
28472 04/04/96 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL NOS VETERINARY SERVICES K-9 UNIT 001-17D-999-5327 39.00 39.00
264173 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AWIN 001-2340 15.00
28473 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADY 001-1180 8.39
28413 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39
2847-@ 04/D4/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-REV 001-1180 8.39-
2647@ 04/04/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 31.78
28474 04/04/96 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 COLEMAN 001-150-999-5118 72.24 72.24
2647; 04/04/96 002272 DOLLAR RENT A CAR COMM SRVC CF/4/10-12/JN,HM,RS 190-180-999-5258 271.32 271.32
28476 04/D4/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO POLICE BADGE FOR NEW MAYOR 001-100-999-5220 61.20
26476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN A CO WALLET FOR MAYORS POLICE BADGE 001-100-999-5220 31.00
28476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENWANN-ROVIN & CO FREIGHT 001-100-999-5220 5.52
26476 04/04/96 000517 ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO TAX 001-100-999-5220 6.90 104.62
26477 04/04/96 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE REPAIR MAINLINE SANTIAGO/YNEZ 193-180-999-5212 177.67 177.67
@@478 04/04/96 000478 FAST SIGNS NELENE FOX, SIGNS 190-180-999-5244 90.00
8 04/04/96 000478 FAST SIGNS TAX 190-180-999-5244 6.98 96.98
26479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 165-199-999-5250 9.50
28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 9.50
28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 9.50
28473 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 33.19
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28479 04/04/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-501-5230 23.25 84.94
28480 04/04/96 FEMIA, PETER SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28481 04/04/96 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 001-150-999-5248 170.00 170.00
28482 04/04/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-6664-0391-0214/J.K. 100-164-604-5260 106.69 106.69
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 521.94
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 100-2360 101.97
26483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 2.13
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 114.76
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 4.25
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 8.50
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2350 12.75
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 2.12
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 7.22
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 4.24
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 8.50
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 8.50
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 19.12
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS, CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 892.41
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 100-2380 171.39
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 5.28
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 185.99
28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 5.85
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 p@.89
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 1,0.31
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 4.76
28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 280-2380 14.27
28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 7.08
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 18.52
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 6.89
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 22.83
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 927.83
28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 100-2500 181.07
26463 04/04/95 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 165-2500 5.59
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 195.53
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 6.19
21483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 7.29
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 21.49
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 5.04
28481 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 280-2500 15.10
28463 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 7.49
28483 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 320-2500 19.59
28483 04/@04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 330-2500 7.29
284a3 04/04/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STO 340-2500 24.16 3,602.ij
28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR CALENDARS 001-161-501-5220 43.02
28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR CALENDARS 001-161-502-5220 20.44
28485 04/04/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, REFILLS FOR 96 CALENDARS 001-161-502-5220 53.23 116.69
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
tl""4/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28486 04/D4/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-3526/FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 80.15
28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-693-0956/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 26.96
28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4356/KENT HINTERGARDT 320-199-999-5208 28.66
28486 04/04/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-694-8927/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 25.80
28486 04i'04@196 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-699-2475/PUBLIC WORKS 100-164-601-5208 38.24
26486 0 4 / 04 / 9 6 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-699-7945/CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 51.59 2 5 1 . 40
284817 04/04/96 001355 G T ECALIFORNIA, INC. MONTHLY ACCESS CHARGES 320-199-999-5208 305.00 305.00
26486 04/04/96 GLEN, TYLER SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 449.48
28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 45.87
28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 62.71
28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 41.51
28489 04/04/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 7.43 607.00
' @4iD4/i6 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI SUB:GAAFR NEWSLETTER/G.ROBERTS 001-140-999-5228 50.00 50.00
264SL
@l 041'04/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 190-180-999-5250 41.67
il 04/041,'96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 100-164-601-5250 41.66
@6491 04/04/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, REPLACE EXTERIOR SIREN I YARD 001-162-999-5250 41.67
28431 04/04/98 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM SERVICES FOR CABOOSE 340-199-999-5250 75.00 200.00
2&4i2 04/04/96 NAGBERG, KELLY SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
2649-.@ 04/04/96 HOFFMAN, BEKKI SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28494 04/04/96 002273 HOTEL PACIFIC COMM SRVCS CF/EDWARDS/4/10-12 190-180-999-5258 327.80 327.80
2849' 04/04/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,718.24
28'495 04/04/96 000194 1 0 W A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 100-2080 224.83
261"+35 04/04/96 000194 1 C N A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 530.42
2-049;@ 041104/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 28.04 2,501.53
284@6 04/04/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 145.66
28496 04/04/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 100-2140 145.65 291.31
26497, 04/04/96 JOE, CRYSAL SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28496 04/04/96 JONES, MARY REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00
26439 04/04/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES P/C SRVCS/WESTERN BY-PASS 210-165-612-5802 587.50 567.50
04/04/96 002277 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL WOODY'S WISE WASTE BROCHURE 194-180-999-5254 66.95 66.95
..ul @4/04/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 113.15
285@l 04/04/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/17 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 219.65 332.80
28502 04/04/q6 002023 KING, WENDE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 672.00 672.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28503 04/04/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 22.03 22.03
28504 04/04i96 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC. POOL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 14.67 14.67
28505 04/04/96 000209 L I M FERTILIZER, INC. PARTS, EQUIP AND REPAIRS 190-180-999-5242 191.31
26505 04/04/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES-TCSD 190-180-999-5242 76.45
28505 04/04/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 7.00 274.76
28@06 04/04/96 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES COMM SRVCS CF/EDWARDS/4/10-12 190-180-999-5258 235.00 235.00
28507 04/04/96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TCSD VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR 190-180-999-5214 68.95
28507 04/04i96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER REPAIR/MAINT. VEHICLE; C.M. 001-110-999-5214 264.88 333.83
28508 04/04/96 LIEBERG, KATIE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28509 04/04/96 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL APR-INTERIM FIRE STATION RENT 001-171-999-5470 600.00 600.00
28510 04/04/96 MARQUETTE, SHIRLEY REFUND-VIPER VOLLEYBALL 190-183-4982 75.00 75.00
26511 04/04/96 MAVIS, LILA SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365
28512 04/04/96 MCFALL, NANCY REFUND-WOMEN'S SELF DEFENSE 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00
28513 04/04/96 MILLER, TERI REFUND-YOGA FOR THE 90'S 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00
28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS POOL HEATER REPAIR - CRC 190-180-999-5212 468.21
28514 04/D4i96 002211 MISSION POOLS UNITHERM GOVENOR DISC 190-180-999-5212 355.35
28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS UNITHERM GOVENOR GASKET 190-180-999-5212 9.66
28514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS LABOR 190-180-999-5212 60.00
26514 04/04/96 002211 MISSION POOLS TAX 190-IaO-999-5212 64.58 957.80
28515 O@1/04/,96 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING IWERG DIRT RD GRADING SANTIAGO 195-180-999-5402 2,445.00 2,445.00
28516 04/04/96 MORGAN, JANA REFUND-YOGA FOR THE 90'S 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00
26@41'@ @,t/04/96 001986 MUSI-CAL AUDIO ENVIRONM PORTABLE EQUALIZER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5610 900.67 900.67
28510' 04/04/96 001713 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. DEC ENG SERVS-LST STR BRIDGE 280-199-807-5802 642.72 642.72
26519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-04/05 001-120-999-5254 42.60
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PA95-02/03 001-120-999-5254 42.60
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/ PA95-0112 001-161-501-5256 27.69
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/PA95-0114 001-161-501-5256 27.69
28@iig 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING- PH-230 001-120-999-5256 27.69
28515 04/'04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0009 001-161-501-5256 32.55
28513 04/04i9b 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-OLD TOWN AMEND 001-120-999-5256 31.69
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/PA95-0133/0134 001-161-501-5256 34.08
26519 04/D4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR-PROP ORDINANCE 001-120-999-5256 18.91
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-PRO ORDINANCE A 001-120-999-5256 12.10
28519 04/041@96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-PW95-15 001-120-999-5256 59.04
28519 041'04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 95-14 001-120-999-5256 23.43
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
aill%4/96 10:31 YOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 95-15 001-120-999-5255 17.38
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE ADOPT BEVEL COD 001-120-999-5256 12.10
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADPT 96-01 001-120-999-5256 18.15
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADOPT 96-02 001-120-999-5256 21.21
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0124 001-161-501-5256 28.20
28519 04iG4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR/PA95-0113 001-120-999-5256 34.34
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA96-0027 001-161-501-5256 72.08
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE PA95-0113 001-120-999-5256 11.72
28519 04/04/96 002139 NDRTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-RES. 95-02/03 001-120-999-5254 51.63
28519 04iO4/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE-DIF STUDY NKSHP 001-120-999-5256 6.82
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA95-0125 001-161-502-5256 28.20
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE-SPEED ON RANCHO 001-120-999-5256 10.22
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE-ORDINANCE ADPT 96-03 001-120-999-5256 19.08
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PROP ORDINANCE-SPEED PALA RD 001-120-999-5256 9.88
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES AMENDED PUBLIC DIF WKSHP 3/20 001-120-999-5256 6.82
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-OLD TOWN PRJT 001-120-999-5256 106.32
28519 D4/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING-RDA BONDS HOUSE 001-120-999-5256 26.67
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0019 001-120-999-5256 35.70
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /ORDINANCE 95-13 001-120-999-5256 21.04
19 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0024 001-120-999-5256 40.21
9 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEAR/DUCK POND USTR PLN 001-120-999-5256 34.08
@dbl9 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TINES PUBLIC HEAR /PA96-0027 001-120-999-5256 32.55
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES /PA96-0013 001-161-501-5256 30.42
285)5 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-25 001-120-999-5256 59.73
2E519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIRES NOTICE ORDINANCE-SPEED PALA RD 001-120-999-5256 16.02
26519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES ORDINANCE ADPT-SPEED RANCHO CA 001-120-999-5256 16.02
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSD 001-120-999-5256 7.81-
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSO 001-120-999-5256 196.70
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-IOCSO 001-120-999-5256 56.83-
28519 04/04/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE /PW95-25 001-120-999-5256 59.73 1,338.45
28521 04/04/96 OBLE, BARBARA REFUND-SILK RIBBON EMBROIDERY 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00
26'02@ 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE PI MAINT TRUCK TIRES 190-003 100-164-601-5214 418.54
28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE TIRES-STENCIL TRUCK 194-022 100-164-601-5214 847.48
26122 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS-MAINT DIVISION 100-164-601-5214 50.80
28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIRS-LAND DEVEL 001-163-999-5214 62.94
28522 04/04/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE I SERVICE ALIGNMENT MAINT DIV TRUCK 100-164-601-5214 49.95 1,429.71
26523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - GUARD RESCUE 190-183-999-5310 375.00
2652', 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - JUNIOR GUARD 190-183-999-5310 125.00
28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS T-SHIRT - JUNIOR GUARD 190-183-999-5310 31.25
28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 15.56
28523 04/04/96 001880 PELI GUARD PRODUCTS TAX 190-183-999-5310 42.38 589.19
t 04/04/96 000248 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 202.30
,44 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 65.20
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 190-2130 3.34
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 280-2130 1.00
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 13,720.94
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000245 PERS RET 100-2390 2,662.07
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 82.54
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 2,774.08
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 95.64
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 111.05
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 326.05
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 75.17
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 226.21
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 106.83
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 282.54
26524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 119.24
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 349.87
26524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 52.48
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 11.15
28524 04/04/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 .23
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 11.63
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .47
28524 04/04/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .93
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.39
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .23
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .78
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93
28524 04/04/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000245 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.09 21,287.77
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 654.64
28526 041'04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 57.49
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 57.49
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 406.00
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 451.66
28525 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA 100-2090 122.47
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.27
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 4,228.62
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 100-2090 924.03
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 RELTHNET 190-2090 1,557.27
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 193-2090 295.00
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.40
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 296.00
26526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHMET 340-2090 381.12
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 1,061.76
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 950.53
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 349.60
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS IHEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 65.24
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 1,419.96
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 963.46
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 305.70
2a526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICH 192-2090 313.54
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 194-2090 101.90
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 2,515.28
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 38.40
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 1,008.65
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
0"44/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
'VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (WEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 101.18
28526 04iO4/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 1,258.70
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 100-2090 78.75
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 112.42
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 44.21
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 44.21
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 001-2090 181.78
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHKET 100-2090 8.37
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHHET 190-2090 41.13
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (WEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.00
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 3.68
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 .04
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 18.75
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 104.32
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 34.77
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS INEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 155.67
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 31.93
2E526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 111.93
28526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 2.39
6 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 1,008.65-
.E 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 17.05
ed526 04/04/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE ADMIN ADJUSTMENT FOR APRIL 96 001-150-999-5250 2.54 20,102.65
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:LUCKYS-TCSD CLASS SUPPLI 190-183-999-5320 39.46
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH COMM SKILL CF:R.PREISEND:3/18 001-161-501-5261 41.30
2852'1 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:AMERICAN BATTERY 001-162-999-5214 42.64
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:BATTERY FOR VIDEO CAMERA 100-164-604-5220 43.09
28527 04iO4/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:PMS PRJT-NIGHT WRX 100-164-601-5250 16.08
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:FILM I PHOTO ALBUM 210-190-626-5802 13.95
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:MAINT CREW-PMS PRJT 100-164-601-5260 15.00
26527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB MJM LUNCH UTG 001-110-999-5260 28.73
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:REFRESHMNT SW ALLIANCE 001-110-999-5260 9.00
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:CODE ENFOREMENT SHIRTS 001-162-999-5243 32.32
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:REFRERMNT LIBRARY WTG 001-110-999-5260 8.10
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:M.S.A. UTG REFRESHMNTS 100-164-601-5260 15.00
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:SOUTH 79 CONST MTG 001-110-999-5260 26.00
265217 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:CMBTA OTR UTG :Z.SMITH 001-140-999-5258 18.00
2E5217 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIWB:REFRESHMNT SPRING DANCE 190-180-999-5301 36.33
26521 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:MILEAGE CUBTA MTG:Z.SMTH 001-140-999-5258 46.50
28527 04/04/96 000249 PETTY CASH REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR SPRG DANCE 190-180-999-5301 11.45 442.95
2E528 04/04/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-502-5224 13.93
28528 04/04/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-502-5224 13.93 27.86
;AS29 04/04/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPUENT SCISSOR LIFT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 147.53 147.53
jO 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 001-2340 1,651.24
2853@ 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPW 100-2340 459.32
28530 04/04/95 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 165-2340 14.59
28530 04/'04/i6 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 190-2340 263.00
28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 280-2340 14.58
YOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 300-2340 14.58
28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 330-2340 22.11
28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 340-2340 72.92
28530 04/04/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA PMT FOR APRIL 96 001-1180 146.78 2,659.12
28531 04/04/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3 001-161-501-5261 123.75
28531 04/04/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3 001-161-502-5261 123.75
28531 04/D4/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA USER CF:RUIZ:5/1-3 001-161-501-5261 247.50 495.00
28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-RANCHO CAL RD SDWLK 210-155-661-5804 54.40
28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-RANCHO CA CREEK PRJ 210-190-138-5802 244.80
28532 04./04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C TAX 210-190-138-5802 18.97
28532 04/04/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS MISC SUPPLIES-CIP 001-165-999-5222 12.93 331.10
28533 04/04/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS 190-180-999-5212 60.86 60.86
28534 04/04/96 001680 RAY GRAGE AND ASSOCIATE MAR PLAN CHECK SERVS 001-162-999-5248 758.47 758.47
28535 04/04/96 002270 ROADRUNNERS MOBILE MUSI DEPOSIT:96 HOLIDAY RECOG DINNE 001-150-999-5265 200.00 200.00
28536 04/04/95 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST I FEB 96 WALCOTT CORRIDOR SERVS 210-165-637-5802 200.00 200@.
28537 04/04/96 RUGGLES, ERIC SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28538 04/04/96 000397 SAN DIEGO ZOO ADMISSION FOR DAY CAMP KIDS 190-183-999-5350 359.55 359.55
28539 04/04/96 002271 SCHOOL/LAW ENFORCEMENT SCHOL/LAW ENF CF:NAVARRO:4/23 001-170-999-5261 195.00
28539 04/04/96 002271 SCHOOL/LAW ENFORCEMENT SCHOL/LAW ENFOR CF:TAYLOR:4/23 001-170-999-5261 195.00 390.00
2E540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3/96 001-161-501-5261 112.50
28540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:BEAL:5/1-3/96 001-161-502-5261 112.50
28540 04/04/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA USER CF:RUIZ:5/1-3/96 001-161-501-5261 225.00 450.00
28541 04/04/96 SLANE, STEPHANIE SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28542 04/04/96 000645 SMART I FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TEEN EXTRAVAGANZA 190-183-999-5320 194.75 194.75
28543 04/04/96 SMITH, WENDY REFUND-TINY TOTS 190-183-4980 37.00 37.00
2E544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH STREE 190-181-999-5240 745.24
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ST LIGHT METERS 191-180-999-5319 3,505.74
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ST LIGHT METERS 191-180-999-5240 427.81
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5042 CITY HALL METERS 340-199-999-5240 2,654.03
2E544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5059 TCSO METERS 190-180-999-5240 2,332.19
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5067 IRRG METERS 193-180-999-5240 1,195.85
28544 04/O4i96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6289 STORAGE 340-199-999-5240 103.84
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-502-8077 43200 BUS PRK 340-199-999-5240 298.52
28544 04/04/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-5489 CITY YARD 100-164-601-5240 97.16 11,360.98
28545 04/04/96 001156 SOUTHERN CALIF PUBLIC P AQUATIC TRAINING:J.DENT:4/20 190-183-999-5310 15.00
28545 04/04/96 001156 SOUTHERN CALIF PUBLIC P AQUATIC TRAINING:M.WIKERT:4/20 190-183-999-5310 15.00 30.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11
04@114/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28546 04/04/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909 202-4759 TE 001-162-999-5208 61.71 61.71
28547 04/04/96 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES-RECREATION CLASS 190-180-999-5301 30.51 30.51
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 401.45
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 100-2125 63.82
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 92.50
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 18.50
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 11.10
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.53
28548 04/04/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 18.50 510.50
28549 04/04/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC PCKUP AIRPT:R.ROBERTS:LEGUE CF 001-100-999-5258 67.50
28549 04/04/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC DRPOF AIRPT:R.ROBERTS:LEGUE GF 001-100-999-5258 77.50 145.00
28550 04/04/96 001254 TEMECULA STAMP I GRAPHI BUTTONS:SPRING SWING DANCE COM 190-180-999-5301 80.00
28550 04/04/96 001254 TEMECULA STAMP I GRAPHI TAX 190-180-999-5301 6.20 86.20
28551 04/04/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TROPHIES-SEARCH FOR THE STARS 190-183-999-5320 53.88 53.88
04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 3,287.01
2do52 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 644.16
28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 68.75
28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 37.50
28552 04/D4i96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 111.33
28552 04/04/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 62.50 4,211.25
2855.'; 04/04/96 000316 THORNHILL, GARY RE-ISSUE CK23819:REIMB A]CP CF 001-161-501-5251 17.50
2855@ 04/D4i96 000316 THORNHILL, GARY RE-ISSUE CK23819:REIMB AICP CF 001-161-502-5261 17.50 35.00
28554 04/04/96 000668 TIMMY 0. PRODUCTIONS TALENT SHOW:MASTER OF CEREMONY 190-183-999-5320 50.00 50.00
2E;55 04/G4/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 203.30
2855-. 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20
2E555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.41
28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00
28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69
28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 203.30-
28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 154.20
2855@, 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32-41
2655;, 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS, 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00
28555 04/04/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69 406.60
26556 04/04/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA I ASSOCIATES MAR SPACE PLAN SERVS-CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 725.00
'@aA56 04/04/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA I ASSOCIATES 1ST FLOOR ENTRY/BALCONY DESIGN 210-199-650-5804 675-00 1,400.00
@ -j7 04/04/96 001065 U S C U /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 001-2080 2,650.78
26557 04/04/96 001065 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 100-2080 174.34
28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (DEF, C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 756.70
28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00
28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO IDEF, C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 19.70
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12
04/04/96 10:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 300-2080 5.00
28557 04/04196 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 312.50
28557 04/04/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COUP 340-2080 87.50 4,011.52
28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 485.40
28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C V /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 89.70
28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 600.02
28556 04/04/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 46.88
28556 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 79.64
28558 04/04/96 000389 U S C 9 /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 45.90 1,347.54
26559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UV 001-2120 67.27
28559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 100-2120 10.93
28559 04/04/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 190-2120 15.00
28559 04/04/95 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 280-2120 .30 93.50
2E5&0 04/04/@6 001209 VAULT INC., THE 2/15-3/15 RECORDS STORAGE 330-199-999-5277 387.62 387.62
28561 04/04/96 WARKENTINE, ELLEN SISTER CITIES STUDENT TRIP 001-100-999-5280 365.00 365.00
28562 04/04/96 001318 WOLFF, MIKE ROOM:PMS PRJT NIGHT INSPECTION 100-164-601-5250 89.44 89,
28563 04/04/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN MEDICAL SUPPLIES NOT INVOICED 340-199-999-5250 13.22
28563 04/04/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 63.68 76.90
TOTAL CHECKS 248,821.97
VouruRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
O" S 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 14,673.18
100 GAS TAX FUND 3,951.39
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 22.64
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 12,532.92
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 71.94
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 8.46
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 170.45
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 20.58
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 1,349.26
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 15,018.79
300 INSURANCE FUND 712.43
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,861.41
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,606.83
340 FACILITIES 613.08
TOTAL 54,613.36
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAr@g: 1
04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28567 04/11/96 001523 A M BEST COMPANY, INC. 96 P/C KEY RATING GUIDE 300-199-999-5228 112.31 112.31
28568 04/11/96 001912 ALLMON, VYLANI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 432.00 432.00
28569 04/11/96 002173 AMERICAN LIGHTING BALLFIELD LIGHT REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 400.00 400.00
28570 04/11/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 233.82
28570 04/11/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 288.79 522.61
28571 04/11/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 2/24 DULL 001-110-999-5118 78.43 78.43
28572 04/11/96 000427 ARTESIA IMPLEMENT, INC. REPAIR AND SERVICE OF TRACTOR 190-180-999-5214 732.70 732.70
28573 04/11/96 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMP REISSUE CK#22414:REFUND G.BOND 001-2670 1,500.00 1,500.00
28574 04/11/96 BAGINGITO, TINA REFUND:BASKETBALL FUNDAMENTALS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00
28575 04/11/96 BALUYUT, ROBERTO REFUND:INSTANT PIANO 190-183-4982 30.00 30.00
28576 04/11/96 000623 BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI BALLOONS FOR EASTER EVENTS 190-180-999-5301 160.00
28576 04/11/96 000623 BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI TAX 190-180-999-5301 12.40 172.40
28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I BUSINESS LIC APPLICATION FORMS 001-140-999-5222 299.00
28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 14.75
28577 04/11/96 001178 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I TAX 001-140-999-5222 23.17 336.92
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INSURANCE 96 CHEVY P/U #9521 300-199-999-5200 371.00
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 001-2370 2,989.99
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 100-2370 1,099.16
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 165-2370 22.64
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 190-2370 1,379.86
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 191-2370 71.94
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 192-2370 8.46
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 193-2370 135.25
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 194-2370 20.58
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 280-2370 74.76
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 300-2370 8.12
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 320-2370 21.50
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 330-2370 9.29
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 340-2370 278.65
28578 04/11/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MARCH 196 WORKERS COMP 001-1182 40.25 6,531.45
28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA IRRIGATION REPAIRS/LOMA LINDA 190-180-999-5415 345.60
28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN 190-180-999-5415 140.00
28579 04/11/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LABOR 190-180-999-5415 64.00 549.60
28580 04111/96 CHOI, SANGWON REFUND:DISNEY ANIMATION 190-183-4982 50.00 50.00
28581 04/11/96 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 526.82 526.82
28582 04/11/96 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. FEB 96 PRKING CITATIONS PROCES 001-140-999-5250 39.00
VOUCRP,E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
01 S 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28582 04/11/96 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. FEB 96 PRKING CITATIONS PROCES 001-170-999-5250 39.00 78.00
28583 04/11/96 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS VETERINARY SERVICES K-9 UNIT 001-170-999-5327 79.32 79.32
28584 04/11/96 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 3/31 COLEMAN 001-110-999-5118 72.24 72.24
28585 04/11/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RE-CYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 26.94 26.94
28586 04/11/96 002283 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL VOORBURG TULIP DED. RECPT 4/28 001-100-999-5280 830.78 830.78
28587 04/11/96 002148 EXPRESS TEL LONG DISTANCE PHONE SERVICES 320-199-999-5208 1,114.77 1,114.77
28588 04/11/96 002175 FIELD, SCOTT F. MAR LEGAL SERVS-HILL VS CITY 300-199-999-5207 221.00 221.00
28589 04/11/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 69.95
28589 04/11/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MISC. MAINT SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 135.45 205.40
28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-695-3539/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 34.64
28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-0128/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,069.32
28590 04/11/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-2309/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 28.56 1,132.52
- 04/11/96 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. 3/28-4/27 MONTHY ACCESS CHRGE 320-199-999-5208 350.00 350.00
2t,y2 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-5234 440.00
28592 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 190-180-999-5234 352.00
28592 04/11/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD APRIL RENT FOR CITY YARD 001-162-999-5234 88.00 880.00
28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00
28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00
28593 04/11/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 300.00 500.00
28594 04/11/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM FEB PROF SRVCS-PARKVIEW SITE 210-190-626-5804 587.50
28594 04/11/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM CREDIT:INCORRECTLY BILLED 210-190-626-5804 329.00- 258.50
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 16.64
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 40.22
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 12.70
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 231.68
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 174.92
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 31.88
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 444.01
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 28.47
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 84.57
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 94.35
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5220 16.50
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 24.16-
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 30.18-
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 28.21-
28595 04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 16.05-
04/11/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 62.24- 1,015.10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PASF 3
04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28596 04/11/96 002284 GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLANNING GUIDE 001-150-999-5228 22.16 22.16
28597 04/11/96 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH DEVELOPMENT CODE COVERS & TAGS 001-161-501-5222 2,221.81 2,221.81
28598 04/11/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS SEC GUARD SRVCS/3/18-24 210-190-137-5801 526.40 526.40
28599 04/11/96 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 180.00 180.00
28600 04/11/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212 86.18 86.18
28601 04/11/96 001158 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL:A/P WKSHP/ALVARZ/4/17-18 001-140-999-5261 119.40 119.40
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 69.19
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 73.90
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 155.88
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 586.92
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES CREDIT:INCORRECT PART 001-170-999-5214 97.91-
28602 04/11/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 12.09 800.07
28603 04/11/96 000806 HOWARD, BOBBY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 400.00 400.00
28604 04/11/96 000388 I C B 0, INC. BLDG & SAFETY WEEK SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 31.25 -
28605 04/11/96 001377 INLAND EMPIRE MANAGER'S MEMBERSHIP:R. BRADLEY 001-110-999-5226 20.00 2u.uO
28606 04/11/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 99.01
28606 04/11/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 192.19 291.20
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 2.97
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 11.86
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 6.90
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKOIS OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 28.28
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 14.65
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 23.77
28607 04/11/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 37.17 125.60
28608 04/11/96 000488 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM DAYCAMP FIELD TRIP 4/16/96 190-183-999-5350 599.00 599.00
28609 04/11/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 470.80 470.80
28610 04/11/96 001982 L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I EMERGENCY REMOVAL OF 3 TREES 100-164-601-5402 600.00 600.00
28611 04/11/96 002282 LIEBER, CARON TCSD INSTRUCTORS EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 192.00 192.00
28612 04/11/96 000414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM PURCHASE & DEVELOP/TCSD 190-180-999-5250 40.92 40.92
28613 04/11/96 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING COUNCIL MEETING REFRESHMENTS 001-100-999-5260 80.00 80.00
28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 100-164-601-5261 30.00
28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 001-163-999-5261 30.00
28614 04/11/96 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND MAINT-CONST SAFETY CF:5/15-16 100-164-601-5261 30.00
VOUCRRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
oz 5 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28615 04/11/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 3/24 SNYDER 190-180-999-5118 574.00 574.00
28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TEM POLICE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS 001-170-999-5222 535.34
28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-170-999-5222 41.49
28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TEM POLICE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS 001-170-999-5222 76.50
28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-170-999-5222 5.93
28616 04/11/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-RICH SOLTYSIAK 001-161-502-5220 110.44 769.70
28617 04/11/96 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI HOOKS-PLAY EQUIP REPLACE PARTS 190-180-999-5212 25.80
28617 04/11196 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212 4.51
28617 04/11/96 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI TAX 190-180-999-5212 2.00 32.31
28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR APR LEASE PMT-INTRM FIRE STATN 001-171-999-5470 905.00
28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR TAX 001-171-999-5470 70.14
28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR APR LEASE PMT-INTRM FIRE STATN 001-171-999-5470 685.00
28618 04/11/96 001892 MOBILE MODULAR TAX 001-171-999-5470 53.09 1,713.23
28619 04/11/96 NAY, LLOYD REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
28620 04/11/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE/PA96-0001 001-161-501-5256 30.42
28620 04/11/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE/PA96-0018 001-161-501-5256 30.42 60.84
04/11/96 000235 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, IN MAR CREEK RESTORATION BLUEPRNT 210-190-138-5802 516.00 516.00
28622 04/11/96 OLIVIER, SHANLI C. REFUND-RETURN GEN PLANIZON MAP 001-199-4060 50.00 50.00
28623 04/11/96 000667 P A P A CONTINUING ED/STATE PEST LICNS 190-180-999-5261 45.00 45.00
28624 04/11/96 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 408.00 408.00
28625 04/11/96 001707 PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, K-9 FOOD AND SUPPLIES 001-170-999-5327 76.26 76.26
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 56.61
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-PLAN 001-161-501-5224 17.24
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-PLAN 001-161-502-5224 17.24
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 29.50
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 52.07
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 50.56
28626 04/11/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING-TCSD 190-180-999-5301 15.49 238.71
28627 04/11/96 000740 PICCA DELI FLUOR DANIEL MTG-LUNCH 4/12/96 001-110-999-5260 130.92 130.92
28628 04/11/96 002019 PRECISION INTERCONNECT INSTALL CABLE/5 DAT-2 CAT-1 VC 320-199-999-5215 245.00 245.00
28629 04/11/96 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. PUBLICATION:COMPLETE WORD BOOK 001-161-501-5228 18.99
28629 04/11/96 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. PUBLICATION:COMPLETE WORD BOOK 001-161-502-5228 18.98 37.97
28630 04/11/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PARKS 190-180-999-5238 90.54 90.54
1 04/11/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-180-999-5212 121.26 121.26
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGF 5
04/11/96 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28632 04/11/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT-CIP PRJT PW95-06 210-165-655-5802 24.18
28632 04/11/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT-CIP PRJT PW95-13 210-165-659-5802 24.18 48.36
28633 04/11/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212 63.44
28633 04/11/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY PARKS 190-180-999-5212 46.55 109.99
28634 04/11/96 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET MAR 96 PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 35.00 35.00
28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-RIVERTON 190-180-999-5238 62.89
28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-RANCHO CAL 190-180-999-5238 188.66
28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-NICOLAS RD 190-180-999-5238 172.50
28635 04/11/96 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORTABLE TOILET-DUCK POND 190-180-999-5238 50.39 474.44
28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RVSD CO. 001-2260 5.00
28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RVSD CO. 001-170-4055 45.00
28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RSVD CO. 001-2260 5.00
28636 04/11/96 RIVERSIDE CO. CITATION PAID CITY OF TEM S/B RSVD CO. 001-170-4055 45.00 100.00
28637 04/11/96 000405 SMITH, PHILLIP I.C.B.C. CERTIFICATION REIMB. 001-162-999-5261 45.00 45.00
28638 04/11/96 SNODDY, LISA R. REFUND-HOME OCCUPATION FEE 001-199-4056 20.00 20.00
28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5836 VIA DEL CORONADO 193-180-999-5240 17.60
28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6073 VIA RIO TMCULA 193-180-999-5240 17.60
28639 04/11/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6420 VIA CORDOBA IRRG 190-180-999-5240 60.40 95.60
28640 04/11/96 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE-B&S VEHICLE-337870 001-162-999-5214 22.49 22.49
28641 04/11/96 001497 T R W,INC.-INFORMATION CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS 280-199-999-5250 50.00 50.00
28642 04/11/96 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION CLASSES SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 35.54 35.54
28643 04/11/96 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES 001-2170 93.20 93.20
28644 04/11/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC SHUTTLE:LEAGUE CF:3/9-11:FORD 001-100-999-5258 67.50 67.50
28645 04/11/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 8 PLAQUES-SPRG SWING DANCE COM 190-180-999-5301 212.97
28645 04/11/96 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TAX 190-180-999-5301 16.51 229.48
28646 04/11/96 THEODORE, MICHELENE REFUND-AQUATIC PROGRAMS 190-183-4975 75.00 75.00
28647 04/11/96 002286 THERMAL INDUSTRIES INC HEALTH ZONE LOAN-THERMAL INDUS 280-1520 9,263.50 9,263.50
28648 04/11/96 000668 TIMMY D. PRODUCTIONS SOUND SYSTEM - EASTER EGG HUNT 190-182-999-5239 100.00 100.00
28649 04/11/96 002111 TOGO'S CATERING SERVS-TEAM BUILD-B&S 001-162-999-5261 75.55 75.55
28650 04/11/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PW ADMIN 100-164-604-5220 151.73
28650 04/11/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CIP 001-165-999-5220 45.28 197.01
28651 04/11/96 001890 VORTEX DOORS REMOTE UNLOCKING GATE-CRC 190-182-999-5212 998.00 9@
VOUrHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
0 6 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CREDIT:RETURNED SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 45.20-
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 54.82
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CREDIT:RETURNED SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 454.27-
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY HALL BLDG MAINT. SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 49.46
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 732.51
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY HALL BLDG MAINT. SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 180.55
28652 04/11/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUILDING MAINT. SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 53.82 571.69
28653 04/11/96 001867 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, I REMOVAL OF ONE TREE & STUMP 100-164-601-5402 150.00 150.00
28654 04/11/96 002130 WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-CITYWIDE PCC REPAIRS 280-2035 3,895.10 3,895.10
28655 04/11/96 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CA CODE PUBLICATIONS/CITY HALL 001-120-999-5228 125.00 125.00
28656 04/11/96 002253 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY, T INSTALL FENCE @ NAKAYAMA PRK 190-180-999-5212 2,250.00 2,250.00
28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH FAST TRACK FLYER-DESIGN & LYUT 280-199-999-5270 129.30
28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH L.A. BUSINESS JRNL AD LAYOUT 280-199-999-5270 536.38
28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH SAN DIEGAN AD-DESIGN & LAYOUT 280-199-999-5270 638.75
28657 04/11/96 002092 WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH BALLOON & WINE AD-DESIGN/LAYUT 280-199-999-5270 431.00 1,735.43
- 04/11/96 001318 WOLFF, MIKE ROOM:P.M.S. PUBLIC WORKS PRJT 100-164-601-5250 136.08 136.08
20068 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAR MAINT CONTRACT COPIER 5012 330-199-999-5217 53.75
28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE CHRGE-PUBLIC WRKS 330-199-999-5217 301.14
28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 12/28 - 3/27 METER USAGE-5100A 330-199-999-5239 1,242.65
28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TONER CARTRIDGE-CRC COPIER 190-182-999-5220 112.00
28668 04/11/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 190-182-999-5220 8.68 1,718.22
28669 04/11/96 YONTZ, HEIDI REFUND-PARKING CITATION #11100 001-2260 5.00
28669 04/11/96 YONTZ, HEIDI REFUND-PARKING CITATION #11100 001-170-4055 45.00 50.00
28670 04/11/96 001918 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. REPLACE CROSS BARS/STENCIL TRK 100-164-601-5218 890.80
28670 04/11/96 001918 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 69.04 959.84
TOTAL CHECKS 54,613.36
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
04/11/96 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 27,400.97
100 GAS TAX FUND 14,199.00
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 4,468.85
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 40,738.48
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 815.58
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 81,828.29
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 125,036.45
300 INSURANCE FUND 1,204.58
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,202.41
340 FACILITIES 490.00
TOTAL 298,384.61
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
0 6 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMDUNT AMOUNT
28673 04/23/96 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. 2000 LBS -TEMP ASPHALT REPAIRS 100-164-601-5218 1,556.80
28673 04/23/96 000104 ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 120.65 1,677.45
28674 04/23/96 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT DESIGN OF SIXTH STREET PARKING 280-199-804-5802 8,047.50 8,047.50
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV/SENIOR CENTER 190-180-999-5415 1,815.30
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROV/C.R.C. 190-180-999-5415 1,954.70
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/PARKS 190-180-999-5415 13,547.61
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/SEN CENTER 190-181-999-5415 242.52
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/CRC 190-182-999-5415 1,670.81
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 815.58
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/NICDLAS PRK 190-180-999-5415 1,015.00
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/DUCK POND 190-180-999-5415 1,445.00
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/PALA PARK 190-180-999-5415 2,336.00
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA MARCH LDSC MAINT/CITY HALL 340-199-999-5415 490.00
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LAND. MAINT/BUTTERFIELD STAGE 190-180-999-5415 977.60
28675 04/23/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC IMPROVEMENTS/VETERANS PRK 190-180-999-5415 1,059.56 27,369.68
28676 04/23/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. 12/02/94 INMAN, JENNIFER 300-199-999-5205 1,204.58 1,204.58
28677 04/23/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PHASE 1 ENVIRO/WINCHESTER PRK 210-190-149-5802 1,800.00 1,800.00
04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY C.R.C. EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM 190-182-999-5212 900.00
e.@-(8 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY LABOR 190-182-999-5212 350.00
28678 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 60.00
28678 04/23/96 002193 GRAHAM COMPANY TAX 190-182-999-5212 69.75 1,379.75
28679 04/23/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, PGRSS PMT #3 FIRE STATION #84 210-190-626-5804 61,427.69
28679 04/23/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RETENTION:PMT #3 FIRE STATION 210-2035 6,142.76- 55,284.93
28680 04/23/96 000520 H D L COREN & CONE, INC 95/96 PROPERTY TAX SRVCS 001-140-999-5248 2,400.00 2,400.00
28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 1,000.00
28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 1,000.00
28681 04/23/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 269.86 2,269.86
28682 04/23/96 001979 INLAND PAINTING CRC POOL IMPROVEMENTS/REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 3,700.00 3,700.00
28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES P/C SERVCS/WESTERN BY-PASS 210-165-612-5802 1,037.50
28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES PLAN CHECK SRVCS LAND DEV 001-163-999-5249 1,387.50
28683 04/23/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES WORKERS COMP:INVOICE #96.06 001-1182 12.13- 2,412.87
28684 04/23/96 000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, FEB PROF SRVCS/WINCH BRIDGE 280-199-602-5804 1,325.50 1,325.50
28685 04/23/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION MAR PRGSS PMT-SAM HICK PRK 280-199-805-5804 60,489.79
28685 04/23/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-MAR PMT SAM HICK PRK 280-2035 6,048.97- 54,440.82
28686 04/23/96 002052 MAPLES & ASSOCIATES ASPHALT WORK-COMMERCE CNTR DR. 100-164-601-5402 12,521.55 12,521.55
- 11 04/23/96 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS 190-183-999-5380 1,247.40 1,247.40
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
04/11/96 17:13 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
28688 04/23/96 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES APRIL-JUNE 96 CSD ADMIN SERVS 190-180-999-5370 4,583.37 4,583.37
28689 04/23/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB PROF RDA CONSULTING SERVS 280-199-999-5248 4,468.86
28689 04/23/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB PROF RDA CONSULTING SERVS 165-199-999-5248 4,468.85 8,937.71
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT 2-RAIL RECYCLED FENCE/DUCK PND 210-190-143-5804 8,725.08
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT 16' DOUBLE GATE/DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 300.00
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT ONE 4'GATE & TEN 6X6 POST/POND 210-190-143-5804 501.60
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT LABOR TO INSTALL FENCE/DUCK PN 210-190-143-5804 9,993.62
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT TAX 210-190-143-5804 738.32
28690 04/23/96 001327 RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT CREDIT MEMO-MINUS ONE 4' GATE 210-190-143-5804 107.76- 20,150.86
28691 04/23/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S DEC 95 LAW ENFORC BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 9,825.60
28691 04/23/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS JAN 96 BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 13,800.00 23,625.60
28692 04/23/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAR 96 PRGSS PMT-WINCH & 1-15 280-199-602-5804 63,059.75
28692 04/23/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-MAR PGSS WINCH & 115 280-2035 6,305.98- 56,753.77
28693 04/23/96 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & ENG SERVS-CREEK PATHWAY PRJT 210-190-138-5802 2,500.00 2,500.00
28694 04/23/96 002021 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI MAR RESTROOM MAINT SERVS PRKS 190-180-999-5250 1,494.00 1,494.00
28695 04/23/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES MAR DESIGN SERVS-NEW CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 1,055.00 1,(
28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 DEVELOPER 330-199-999-5220 558.00
28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 TONER 330-199-999-5220 196.00
28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER SUPPLIES-5100 TONER 330-199-999-5220 1,290.00
28696 04/23/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 330-199-999-5220 158.41 2,202.41
TOTAL CHECKS 298,384.61
0
ITEIN4 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRE TOR OF FIN4NCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:April 23,1996
SUBJECT:City Attorney Services
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:That City Council approve the following:
1. Retain Peter Thorson as City Attorney for City of Temecula;
2.Terminate the Agreement for City Attorney Services with Burke, Williams, & Sorensen
Attorneys dated September 26, 1996; and
3.Enter into an Agreement for City Attorney Services with Rlchards, Watson and Gershon
Attorneys at Law per the attached Agreement.
BACKGROUND: The City has retained Burke, Williams and Sorensen (BWS) for City Attorney
services since 1989, with Peter Thorson serving as Temecula City Attorney since May 10,
1994. On March 27, 1996, Mr. Thorson resigned as Partner and Head of the Public Law
Division at Burke, Williams and Sorenson to accept a position at Richards, Watson & Gershon
Attorneys at Law.
As a firm, Richards, Watson & Gershon currently serve as City Attorney for twenty-three cities
in Southern California, and as special counsel to forty cities and eighteen redevelopment
districts throughout California. By contracting with Richards, Watson, & Gershon, the City will
not only benefit from Mr. Thorson's experience with Temecula and his local government
expertise, but would also continue to be afforded the services of a large, full-service law firm.
The areas of specialization for this firm include litigation, insurance, real estate, environmental,
business, public finance, and redevelopment law.
Based on the outstanding service provided to the City by Mr. Thorson, staff recommends that
Mr. Thorson be retained as Temecula City Attorney through an agreement with Richards,
Watson and Gershon. The terms of this agreement are identical to the current contract with
Burke, Williams and Sorensen (see Attachment).
R:\KUHNSAIA7rYAGMTAGN
FISCAL IMPACT:
services at the base/retainer rates and hours negotiated in the September 1995 Agreement with
BWS. All other attorney services will be provided at the then current hourly rate of the
attorney performing the services. These rates are subject to the approval of the City Manager.
Attachment
The City would continue to receive City Attorney/Assistant City Attorney
R \KUHNSA\ATrYAGMT.AGN
AGREEMENT FOR CITY ATTORNEY SERVICE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
TENECULA, a General Law City (hereinafter "City") and the law firm of Richards, Watson &
Gershon Attorneys at Law, a professional corporation (hereinafter "RWG"), shall be dated as of
April 24, 1996. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein the
parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the
following facts:
A. City has heretofore engaged the services of RWG to act as the City Attorney for
City and to perform all legal services which are needed by the City; and
B. It is the desire of the parties hereto to formalize, by means of this Agreement, their
relationship pertaining to the performance of such legal services; and
C. RWG has agreed to provide such legal services, in the time, manner, and for the
compensation, as hereinafter set forth; and
D. That City Council of City has heretofore determined that the public interest,
convenience and necessity require the execution of this Agreement.
SECTION 2. LEGAL SERVICES. RWG shall perform the legal services necessary to
serve the City which shall include, but are not limited, to the following:
A. The designated City Attorney shall attend all meetings of the City Council unless
excused by the City Manager and the designated Assistant City Attorney shall attend all Planning
Conunission Meetin s unless excused by the City Manager- and
9
B. Provide legal counsel at such other meetings of boards, commissions and
committees of the City as directed by the City Council or City Manager; and
C. Provide legal advice and opinions on all matters affecting the City when requested
by the City Council, City Manager, Department Head, or a designated City representative, and
represent the City in administrative proceedings and litigation involving the City which may an'se
from those matters upon which such advice has been given; and
D. Prepare and approve as to legal form all resolutions, ordinances, contracts,
agreements and other legal documents and represent the City in adnu'nistrative proceedings and
litigation involving the City which may arise from those matters upon which such advice has been
given; and
E. Undertake civil and criminal prosecution of violations of City ordinances when
requested to do so by the City Council or City Manager; and
F. Represent the City in administrative proceedings and civil or criminal litigation to
which the City is a party; and
G. Provide legal advice and opinions on all financial matters affecting the City when
requested by the City Council, City Manager, or a Department Director, and represent the City as
bond counsel in the issuance of bonds or other financial transactions involving the City.
RWG shall not be required to perform the services described above where to do so would
be a conflict of interest pursuant to the State Bar Act. When requested by the City Manager or
his designated representative, and in all litigation matters, RWG shall provide City with an
estimate of the costs of litigation or other services to be provided. The City Council shall retain
the right to direct that attorneys other than RWG perform legal work for the City.
SECTION 3. DESIGNATION OF CITY ATTORNEY. PETER M. THORSON of
Richards, Watson & Gershon Attorneys at Law shall be appointed City Attorney of City. The
Assistant City Attorney shall be appointed within five (5) working days of execution of this
Agreement. Such appointees shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council of City and may be
changed by Council action without amending this Agreement. Such appointees shall have the
authority vested in city attorneys by the applicable laws of the State of California. The designated
City Attorney shall be responsible for performing or causing to be performed the work described
in Section 2 of this Agreement.
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION. RWG shall be compensated by City for the
performance of such services as follows-.
A. Basic Retainer. RWG shall be compensated for the performance of basic retainer
services pursuant to this Agreement in the amount of Four Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars
($4,500) per calendar month commencing as of the effective date of this Agreement. Basic
retainer services for the purposes of this AYreement shall be deemed to be the first fifty (50) hours
of City Attorney or Assistant City Attorney legal services rendered each month.
2
B. Additional Services. RWG shall be compensated for additional retainer services in
accordance with the following:
I .Performing of Services by Designated City Attorney and Assistant City
Attorney.
For all time spent by the designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney in
excess of fifty (50) hours per calendar month, RWG shall be compensated on an hourly basis of
one hundred fifteen dollars ($115) and one hundred twenty-five dollars ($125) per hour,
respectively, for all time so spent. The hourly rates of the designated City Attorney and Assistant
City Attorney, exclusive of the basic retainer services may be increased or decreased as of each
July I st occurring during the term of this Agreement, commencing on July 1, 1997, by an amount
approved by the City Council as an amendment to this Agreement.
2.Legal Services Provided by Attorneys Other Than Designated City
Attorney or Assistant City Attorney.
RWG shall be compensated for the performance of legal services by attorneys
other than the designated City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney at the then current hourly
rate of the attorney performing such service, except for bond and financial work, upon approval
of City Manager. On or before March I st of each year occurring during the term of this
Ac,reement, RWG shall submit to the City Manager for review and approval a Est of the hourly
rates of all attorneys available to perform services for the City and the hourly rates therefor which
'II be effective commencing on each said July I st through and including June 'Oth of the
wi 1
following calendar year. The City Attorney shall use his/her best efforts to keep the City Mana-er
and/or appropriate City staff advised as to the attorneys performing work on matters for the City.
The City Attorney shall endeavor to lin-tit legal expenses by utilizing associates or paralegals
where appropriate.
Legal Services for Bond and Financial Matters.
RWG shall be compensated for bond matters in such amounts as are reasonable
and customary for bond counsel in the public sector. Furthermore, RWG shall not proceed with
such work until the City Council approves, in its sole discretion, the compensation and authorizes
the work to proceed.
4. RWG shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable and necessary
expenses incurred by it in the performance of legal services hereto, provided that the same are
first approved by the City Manager. Reimbursable expenses to which RWG shall be entitled shall
include, but not be limited to, duplication costs; word processing costs-, mileage to meetings in
Riverside County in amounts as authorized for other City officers or employees- telephone and
telecommunications costs; extraordinary mail costs; messenger service; and other costs
R:@KT-THNSA\AT7YAGMT.DOC 3
customarily made as a part of the performance of legal services by RWG'M such amounts as
approved by the City Manager. AU reimbursable expenses will be billed to the Citv at their actual
costs without any mark-up for RWG overhead. The designated City Attorney and Assistant City
Attorney shall be entitled to reimbursement for the cost of attending professional conferences and
seminars as approved by the City Manager. Any out of town travel must be approved in advance.
Unless otherwise agreed to in advance, time spent away from home or office which is not in
transit or spent performing legal services should not be compensated. Air travel, unless otherwise
agreed in advance, shall be reimbursed at the coach rate. Extraordinary expenses including
without limitation expenses resulting from the retention of experts, shall be incurred only after
consultation with the City.
5. Advancement of Costs.
RWG will advance individual cost items not exceeding $500 incurred on behalf of
the City. Individual cost items in excess of $500 shall be paid directly by the City or shall be
advanced to RWG pursuant to a separate letter agreement which the City Manager is authorized
to execute on behalf of the City.
6. Payment for Services.
RWG shall submit monthly statements to the City accounting for all services
'ded and costs incurred pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Said statements shall clearly
prove
set forth by date the type of work performed, the time spent on a task, in tenth of an hour
increments, the attorney performing the task, and the attomey's hourly rate. Payment to RWG
shall be made by City within thirty (30) days of receipt of the statement, except for those specific
items on the billing which are contested or questioned and returned by City, with written
explanation, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the statement. RWG shall provide to City a
written response to any statement contested or questioned and fiirther, upon request of City,
'de City with any and all documents related to the service or costs. No charge shall be made
provi
for time expended in providing this information to the City.
SECTION 5. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall commence on May 1, 1996, and
shall continue thereafter unless terminated by either party hereto pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement. City may terminate this Agreement at any time, however City will endeavor to give
RWG thirty (3 0) days written notice prior to termination. RWG may terminate on the giving of
thirty (3 0) days written notice to the City of such termination. RWG will comply with all
obligations required of it pursuant to the State Bar Act in connection with such terrra'nation and
the transition to replacement counsel. RWG shall be compensated for its services rendered
through and including the effective date of such termination.
R:@KUHNSA@T7YAGMT.DOC 4
SECTION 6. NOTICES. Notices required pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by
personal service upon the party to be notified, or by delivery of same to the custody of the United
States Postal Service, or its lawfw successor, postage prepared and addressed as follows-
CITY:City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
RWG:Richards, Watson & Gershon
Thirty-eighth Floor
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1469
Attn: Managing Partner
Service of a notice by personal service shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of such
personal service. Notices given by deposit with the United States Postal Service shall be deemed
to have been given two (2) consecutive business days following the deposit of the same in the
custody of said Postal Service. Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the
other, designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified.
SECTION 7. INDEMNIEFICATION. RWG does hereby agree to defend, indemnify,
protect and hold City, and its elected and appointed officers and officials, employees and other
agents free and harrniess from any claim, demand or judgment which may arise based upon
personal injury or damage to property to a third party arising out of the performance of services
bv RWG hereto.
SECTION 8. INSURANCE. Not in derogation of the provisions of Section 7 hereof,
RWG does hereby agree to take out and maintain in full force and effect under the terms of this
Agreement the following insurance coverage:
A. Such insurance coverage as is required pursuant to the Workers' Compensation
Laws of the State of California; and
B.A liability policy with coverage of not less than $ 1, 000, 000 and
c Professional Liability (errors and omissions) in an amount of not less than
$1,000,000.
P, \KUHNSAA7rYAGMT DOC 5
SECTION 9. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A.Status reports respecting litigation matters shall be provided in accordance with
the City'slitigation guidelines. The reports should include all relevant information and note any
changes inpersonnel working on the case.
B. RWG shall not assign this Agreement, or any of the rights, duties, or obligations
hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that RWG is uru'quely qualified to
perform the services provided for in this Agreement.
C. RWG is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, servants, or agents shall have
control over the conduct of RWG or any of RWG's officers, employees, or agents. RWG shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in
any manner employees of the City. City acknowledges and agrees that the City Attorney,
Assistant City Attorney, and attorneys representing the City will need to represent to others their
capacity and relationship to the City.
D. In the perfon-nance of this Agreement, RWG shall not engage in discrimination in
employment of persons because of the age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry, or relicion
of such persons.
E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed, or represented
by the City or RWG to any third person to create the relationship of principal or agent, of a
partnership, of a joint venture, or of any other association of any kind or nature between the City
and RWG.
F. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of parties concerning the subject
matter hereof, and, all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged
herein. This Agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting
to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto.
G. Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, It is
deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be
interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it
to be prepared.
H. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute,
a waiver of any other provision, whether or not sinu'lar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a
continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless
executed in writing by the party making the waiver.
R'\KUHNSA\A'17YAGMT-DOC 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their representatives as follows:
CITY OF TEMECULA, a General Law City
By
KAREL LINDE@S
MAYOR
ATTEST:
@ S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON,
A Professional Corporation
By
GREGORY W. STEPANICICH
Chairman of the Board
R'kKt,@SA\ATTYAGM'r.DOC 7
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON HOURLY RATES FOR TEMECULA
Watson 190 Bagneris 175
Gershon 190 Susskind 175
Argue 190 Ceccon 175
Lamken 190 Weaver 175
Simon 190 Kaufinann 175
Adler 190 Gans 175
Pieper 190 Ennis 175
Rennett 190 Harris, R. 175
Dorsey 190 Estrada 175
Strauss 190 Wiener 175
Drewry 190 Dilkes 175
Abbott 190 Orr 175
Neufeld 190 Hakman 175
Stepanicich 190 Shintani 175
Browne 190 Rudell 165
Stern 190 Colantuono 165
Jenkins 190 Kim 165
Kramer 190 Weiner 165
Harris, J. 190 Asamura 165
Barrow 185 Sume 165
Lynch 185
Rabin 185
Kunert 185 4th Year Associate 155
Jimbo 185 3rd Year Associate 145
2nd Year Associate 135
1 st Year Associate 125
NOTE - Associate year changes on January
I st of each year corresponding to Bar
admissions.
ITEIN4 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORI
I OR Of
CITY MANAC
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Purchase of Radio System Equipment
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of City Radio Equipment
from Comtronix of Hemet for a total cost of $1 7,265.37.
BACKGROUND: In 1992, the City purchased a 800 megahertz radio system for
approximately $50,000. This radio system was designed by Riverside County Fire and
provided the City with a needed communication link for not only daily operations, but also
emergency communications. At that time, the City was informed that we would not bb able
to license our own communications frequency through the FCC because all local
government frequencies were being utilized.
Therefore, the City was required to "rent" airtime with a commercial provider. This
arrangement has served our needs adequately; however, we recently began to experience
some problems with users having delays in gaining access to the system. These delays
prompted a series of meetings between staff, Riverside County Fire, and the vendor who
has served us since 1992. As a result of these meetings, we discovered that some of these
problems are present because we rent airspace on a commercial system and the new
owners of this system are slowly shutting down access to customers of this system unless
these customers purchase new radio equipment that the owners of the system provide. To
date, we have not been notified that we would be "shut out", but we understand that this
notice could be coming in the near future.
In order to not only protect our investment in the City's radio equipment, but improve the
level of service that employees receive from this equipment, staff entered into a contract
with a reputable radio system engineer, Jerry Campbell of Diversified Communications, who
is an expert in public safety communication systems.
Mr. Campbell provided us with a comprehensive report, at a cost of $5,400, that identified
a frequency that the City could license for our exclusive use. By having its own frequency,
the City would be able to control its own system and avoid having to purchase new
equipment to remain with a commercial vendor. In addition to owning its own system, the
R:\LANIER DA,REPORT%STAFF30.MIS
City would save money by being able to avoid the monthly rental air time charge currently
at approximately $1 1,000 annually.
Mr. Campbell has submitted an application to the FCC to license one primary and one
backup frequency (to be activated when future system growth warrants it) for Temecula.
We were very fortunate to locate this frequency because public safety frequencies, in
Southern California, are extremely difficult to obtain. The frequency that we will have local
control of is also shared by the cities of Anaheim and West Covina. However, because
Temecula is geographically separated from these areas by mountains, this will not cause any
operational problems.
In order for us to utilize this frequency, we will need to purchase radio repeater equipment.
The engineering report identified the KRTM Radio Station repeater site, located in the hills
just Southwest of the City limits, as the location that would provide the best radio coverage
in Temecula. This equipment will be set up at that location and will be operational once we
receive FCC licensing approval, estimated to be within 90 days. Staff has been in contact
with KRTM and have received approval to locate our equipment at this location. However,
before this equipment is placed at the KRTM site, we will need to enter into a ground lease
agreement with KRTM, which is being worked on. This lease can not be finalized at this
time because KRTM is in escrow, scheduled to close in 30 days, for this property.
However, staff is confident that this lease will end up being at a nominal cost to the City.
Finally, if this ground lease negotiation does become difficult, the engineering report did
identify several other locations in the City where a repeater site could be located.
Every successful communication system has back-ups built in. Therefore, the upcoming
fiscal year budget will include funds to place a back-up repeater at the Parkview Fire
Station. This location was also identified as providing excellent radio coverage throughout
the City.
The total cost of this purchase , including delivery and installation is $1 7,265.37. The
vendor, Comtronix of Hemet, has been the City's supplier/vendor, following a competitive
selection process, of radio equipment since 1 992. In addition, this vendor is Riverside
County Fire's supplier, awarded following a competitive selection process, and they
guaranteed the City the same pricing structure as they provide the County. Comtronix has
also agreed not to charge the City a fee for reprogramming all existing equipment once we
move to our own frequency. Finally, Comtronix has spent a significant amount of time, at
no cost to us, to arrive at this plan. Staff recommends awarding of this bid to Comtronix.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase were included in the Mid-Year Budget and are
available in account number 320-1950.
Attachments:Comtronix Quote
Letter of Support, Riverside County Fire
R\LANIEELDA\KEPOR'nSTAFF30.MIS
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
LAND MOBILE RADIO SALES & SERVICE Rlz@r7-ilIED
3501 Tanya Ave. Suite H APR 3 1996
Hemet, Ca. 92545
909-925-7539 909-925-8306 FAX
April 1, 1996
City of Temecula
Attn: Mr. Grant Yates
431 74 Business Park Circle
Temecula, Ca. 92590-6606
Dear Grant
After working with your engineer Jerry Campbell on site evaluation and testing, I am pleased
to quote the following for a new 800 Mhz repeater system. Comtronix of Hemet has been
selected by the County of Riverside Fire Department to supply Kenwood Radio equipment
and the City of Temecula is being offered the same pricing as Riverside County Fire.
Kenwood TKR-900, 800 Mhz, 40 watt repeater. Unit is housed in a 32" locking cabinet,
with power supply, community tone panel, power failure alarm, battery backup input and
duplexer.
12,218.98
Battery backup system with gel batteries, charger and auto power changeover.
746.00
Celwave PD-1 109, 7.5 db gain antenna and 50' low loss cable assy with all necessary
cables, connectors and mounting hardware.
2,278.98
Total Merchandise 1,5243.96
Sales Tax @ 7.75% 1,181.41
Installation Labor 840.00
Total Installed price 17,265.37
This quote is good until May 1, 1 996
Delivery is approx 4 weeks ARO
Terms:Net 30 from Invoice date
Warranty: 2 years Parts and Labor
Sincerely,
C/@ /@
Fred L. Parker
temecl O.wps
Riverside County Fire Department APR 4 l@096
in cooperation with the California Department
Of Forestry and Fire Protection @UMAN HESUUH(,ES
MEMORANDUM
To:Grant Yates Date: 4-1-96
City Of Temecula
From:J.M. HARRIS, Chief
Riverside County Fire Department
Subject:New City Radio System
We have reviewed the attached proposal and costs concerning the radio system for the City. We
concur with both the engineering and purchases proposed.
You asked if we were comfortable with Comtronix as the vendor and equipment needed, we are
on both accounts.
As a side note, Comtronix has an open PO with this Department for service in the mobile radio
field. We do buy Kenwood products from this dealer and are satisfied with the discounts offered
and level of repair. Comtronix is a dealer and repair facility for several public safety agencies,
State, County, and local government.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
I can be reached at 909 940-6940.
Mike Burton
'Communications Manager
ITEA4 6
APPRO
CITY ATTOF
FINANCE DI!
CITY MANAGER)-,,"
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:City Clerk
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION:Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under
the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of
microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details
Accounts Payable 91-92 GTE through Z and Accounts Payable 92-93 A to Par (Retention Code
40106). These records have been microfilmed in duplicate with a copy distributed to the City
Clerk's Records Vault, and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records
Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibits "A'
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
JSG
TO:City Clerk
F'ROM:Paula Sargent
Office Technician
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of. Accounts Payable 91-92 GTE to Z (Retention Code 40106), and
Accotmts Payable 92-93 A to Par (Retention Code 40106) . @ records have been micro
in duplicate with a copy distributed to @ City Clerk's @rds Vault, the Fmance Department and
a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The micro of these records complies with the
requirements of Govermnent Code Section 34090.5.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, 1 hereby give my consent to
@ destruction of records under dx dir@on of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's
adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
..... .....
.. .. .. .....
APPROVED.,
.. ...... ........
...........
artment
....... ......
. ............
........ ... .. I..,
. ...................... ...
..... .. ...
............
.. ..... ...
......... ..
............
..... ... ........ ... . ...
...........
. ..... ....
@Tbort
...............
. ... .. ..............
.... ..
.. ..............
.....
.. .. ... .. ...
Date,
R:\forms\dcxuuct.rqs
RRDESTY ... RRO61 City of TemecuLs Doc. *of................................................................................................. 140 P W 1
04/11/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code............................................................................................... 40106 14:24:49
Destruction Date. 04/23/1996
Item Ret. File Refereme Storaoe NW!a
DateRef. Brief Description Code Security Close Stor&W Location Location Reforeme
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/11/1991 91-92 Accounts PayabLe 91-92 40106 0092 Film 3B2lNlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/01/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0092 Film 3a2lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/02/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0093 Film 3a2lNlADW3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/03/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0094 Film 382lNlAODO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/04/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 009S Film 382INlAO003
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/05/1992 92-93 Accounts PayabLe 92-93 40106 0096 Film 382INIAO003
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
6 Records Processed
EIN4 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORI
FINANCE DIR
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Accept the Offers of Dedication for Public Street and Utility Purposes
along the Walcott Corridor
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF
DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES
BACKGROUND:
The Walcott Corridor project is designed to improve several roads in a relatively undeveloped
portion of the City. Prior to incorporation by the City, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors approved several Parcel Maps adjacent to the Walcott Corridor Project. The
property owners provided offers of dedication for public street and utility purposes but were
not accepted. In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66477.2 the offers of
dedication remain open until the legislative body, by resolution at any time and without further
action by the subdivider, rescinds its action and accepts the right-of-way. Upon completion
of the improvements these roads will be accepted into the maintained road system.
The City Attorney's office has review these offers of dedications as to form.
The following offers of dedication (see Exhibit 'B' for locations) for public streets and utility
purposes are recommended for acceptance:
NICOLAS ROAD:
1 Lots "D', "E' and "F" per PM 37/37-38.
1 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas
CALLE GIRASOL:
1The street shown as the westerly 33 feet of Parcel 4 per PM 1 /44-46 as offered
for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No.
119016 of Official Records.
2)Lot "A' per PM 87/60.
3)The street shown as the southerly and southwesterly 33 feet of Parcel 23 per
PM 1/44-46as offered for dedication bydocument recorded December 5, 1968
as Instrument No. 1 1 901 6 of Official Records; except portion included in PM
87/60.
4)Lot 'Du and the southwesterly 30 feet of Lot "En per PM 73/85-86.
5)Lot "B" per PM 23/27 as offered for dedication by document recorded
December 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except
portion included in PM 73/85-86 and PM 73/41-42.
6)Lot "A" per PM 73/41-42.
7)The street shown as the northeasterly 33 feet of Parcels 2 and 3 per PM 1 7/21
as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as
Instrument No. 1 1 901 6 of Official Records.
CALLE CHAPOS:
1 )The westerly 48 feet of Lot "E" per PM 67/45.
2)Lot "A" per PM 26/97-98.
WALCOTTLANE:
1 )Lots "B" and "C" per PM 75/22-23.
2)Lots "A" and "B' per PM 27/16-17.
3)Lots "A' and "B" per PM 31/43.
4)Lots "A", "B", "C" and "D" per PM 58/49.
5)The street shown as the northerly 33 feet of Parcel 14 per PM 1/44-46 as
offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument
No. 119016 of Official Records.
6) Lot "A" per PM 36/43.
2 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibit "An, inclusive.
3 r:\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.eas
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPNNG THE 0
OF DEDICATION FOR PUBIJC STREET AND UTLLITY
PURPOSES
THE CrrY COUNC]IL OF THE CrrY OF ULA DOES RESOLVE, DEI AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
, 'Ihe County of Riverside was offered dedication as shown on attached hereto
Exhibit "A" for public street and utility purposes but the offers of dedication were not accepted
at the time of map recordation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accept the offers of dedication for public street and utility purposes for those
streets or portions of streets offered to and not accepted by the County of Riverside as described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOffM, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23th day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
AT=T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF PJVERSIDE ss
CrrY OF TEMIP-CULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califon-tia, do hereby ce@ that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23th day of April, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCI]LUMMEBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNC]ILMEMEBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIILMEMEBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEM13ERS:
EXHI]BIT "Am TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
Pursuant to Section 66477.2 of the Subdivision Map Act the
City of Temecula does hereby accepting the offers of dedication
for public street purposes of those portions of the streets listed
below as said offer was expressed on said maps or as
referenced thereon by separate document.
A)Lots "B" and "C" per PM 75/22-23.
B)Lots 'A" and 'B" per PM 27/16-17.
C)Lots 'A" and "B" per PM 31/43.
D)I-ots "A", 'IB", C" and "D" per PM 58/49.
E)The street shown as the westerly 33 feet of Parcel 4 per PM 1/44-46 as offered
for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No.
119016 of Official Records.
F)The westerly 48 feet of Lot "E" per PM 67/45.
G)Lot "A" per PM 26/97-98.
H)Lot "A" per PM 87/60.
1)The street shown as the southerly and southwesterly 33 feet of Parcel 23 per PM
1/44-46 as offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as
Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except portion included in PM 87/60.
J)The street shown as the northerly 33 feet of Parcel 14 per PM 1/44-46 as offered
for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument No.
119016 of Official Records.
K)Lot "A" per PM 36/43.
L)Lot "D" and the southwesterly 30 feet of Lot "E' per PM 73/85-86.
M)Lots "D", "E" and "F" per PM 37/37-38.
N)Lot "B" per PM 23/27 as offered for dedication by document recorded December
5, 1968 as Instrument No. 119016 of Official Records; except portion included
in PM 73/85-86 and PM 73/41-42.
0)Lot "A' per PM 73/41-42.
P)The street shown as the northeasterly 33 feet of Parcels 2 and 3 per PM 17/21 as
offered for dedication by document recorded December 5, 1968 as Instrument
No. 119016 of Official Records.
PROJECT NO. PM 94-10
"ICOL,
CITY OF TEMECULA
WALCOTT CORRIDOR
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS
E4
INDEX MAP
SCALE I' 300 10. Z,3?09
L I"e
LEGEND
Proposed dedication '-'14C,
Existing dedication
EXHIBIrl" "B"
.ITEIA 8
I
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Sewer Agreement with Mervyn's for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for
Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound
Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1.Approve the Agreement and Grant of Easement, and authorize the Mayor to execute
both documents.
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the project, the City received a sewer agreement for the sewer line
relocation for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp
Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 from Mervyn's a California Corporation.
This sewer agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the relocation of the
sewer which is included in the project. Approximately 170 linear feet of the existing 15' V.C.P.
sewer main and 850 linear feet of existing 8" V.C.P. which are located within existing
easements, will be abandoned. The contractor will construct approximately 850 linear feet of
new line in the new location which is about 100 feet east of the new loop on-ramp in an
easement on a portion of the Mervyn's and Palm Plaza parking area.
The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed on Mervyn's property and
the City's responsibilities during construction. The City's contractor will construct the new line
within the easement acquired by the City. The City will also convey the new sewer line
facilities to Eastern Municipal Water District through a Grant Easement (see Exhibit 'B"). The
District will inspect the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future
maintenance.
The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
-I- r\agdrpt\96\0423\pw94-2l.agr/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact is required for this project.
ATTACHMENTSO
Sewer Agreement and Grant of Easement.
-2- r:\agdrpt\96\0423@2l.agr/ajp
Recording Requested By and
when Recorded Return to:
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn:Steven Beswick
This Document Must Be Signed in
the Presence of Notary & Notarized.
NO Recording Fee Required Pursuant
to Government Code Section 27383
AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT (this
"Agreement") is made this 8th day of April, 1996, by
and between MERVYNIS, a California corporation
(hereinafter "Grantor") and THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a
general law city (hereinafter "Grantee")
RECITALS
A. Grantee, in order to improve the sewage
transmission and treatment system serving Grantor's
property hereinafter described and other properties,
wishes to implement, construct and maintain certain
underground sewage transmission and collection
facilities. As part of this process, Grantee intends
to construct a public improvement in the form of
underground sewage transmission and collection
facilities under a portion of Grantor's real property
commonly known as 26443 Ynez Road, Temecula,
California, Assessor's Parcel Number 910-130-044
("Grantor's property") and has requested that Grantor
grant an easement for the construction, operation and
maintenance of such sewage facilities through and
under a portion of Grantor's property, pursuant to the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
B. Grantor is desirous of cooperating with the
Grantee's plans and programs to improve the said
sewage transmission system and Grantor is agreeable to
granting an easement to the Grantee, pursuant to the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Grantor hereby
grants to Grantee a non-exclusive easement thirty (30)
feet in width (the "Easement") in, upon, along, under,
over, and across that certain property situated in the
County of Riverside, State of California, and legally
described on Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement
Area") for purposes of exercising the rights granted
herein. The Easement and right of access granted
herein shall be subject to (i) the rights of Grantor,
and its successors, heirs and assigns to use the
Easement Area as permitted herein and (ii) all other
easements and encumbrances of record. Notwithstanding
anything contained herein to the contrary, it is
understood and agreed that this Grant of Easement
shall not be construed as a grant of fee title.
2. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS RIGHTS.
Grantee shall have the right to use the Easement Area
solely for the purposes of constructing,
reconstructing, removing, replacing, operating,
inspecting, maintaining, repairing, relocating and
improving underground sewage transmission and
collection facilities, which facilities may include,
without limitation, gravity pipelines, pressure
pipelines, manholes, connections and appurtenant
equipment for the collection and transmission of
sewage under the Easement Area; provided, however,
that all such facilities and other improvements shall
be located below the surface of the Easement Area.
All surface access, construction and/or
demolition activities by Grantee in connection with
the Easement and/or Easement Area, including the right
to deposit tools, implements and other materials on
the Easement Area shall be governed by the provisions
of this Agreement and the provisions of that certain
Stipulation entitled "Stipulation re: Nature and
Extent to Proposed Project" ("Stipulation"), as filed
with the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Riverside, Case Number 267963, entitled City
of Temecula, a general law city, Plaintiff, vs.
-2-
cKc\mervyns\ea"ment
Mervvnls, a California corporation; et al.,
Defendants, dated of even date herewith, provided,
however, that Grantee's right to (i) use any part or
portion of the Easement Area surface (other than
general maintenance and repairs of the Easement sewer
facilities) and/or (ii) to perform or otherwise engage
in any construction and/or demolition activities in
connection with the Easement shall, subject to the
provisions of subparagraph 10(n) hereof, expire and be
of no further force or effect from and after March 31,
1997. Grantee's rights pursuant to this Grant of
Easement are subject to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement and Grantee's full performance
hereunder.
3.CONSTRUCTION.
(a) Compliance With Agreement.
Grantee agrees that all of its construction and
demolition activities conducted by it and/or its
contractors shall be accomplished in compliance with
the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
Stipulation.
(b) Sewer Usage. Grantee agrees that
during all construction and demolition periods, no
interruption in Grantor's sewage or other utility
services shall occur.
(c) Applicable Law. Grantee agrees to
comply with all applicable laws in connection with the
construction, demolition and maintenance of the
Easement and improvements therein, including but not
limited to all Federal, State and local laws.
(d) Timing. Grantee agrees that at
such time as it shall commence any demolition and/or
construction activities on or under the Easement Area,
it will perform and complete (i) all such activities
and work and (ii) the full repair and restoration of
the Easement Area and any other affected parts or
portions of Grantor's property to their before
construction condition and to the reasonable
satisfaction of Grantor, on or before the earlier of
(i) March 31, 1997 and (ii) a date which shall be
twenty-one (21) calendar days following the Grantee's
commencement of any such construction and/or
demolition work or activities, all in a lien-free,
good and workmanlike manner, and in accordance with
all applicable laws. The foregoing restoration shall
include,, but not be limited to, (i) the removal of all
-3-
CkC@ mervyns\easoment
of Grantee's property, debris, waste and fencing which
otherwise shall not remain below the surface of the
Easement Area as permitted herein, (ii) grade the
surface to the original grade and remove, stock pile
and replace the surface of the Easement Area to its
original condition, compaction and covering and (iii)
restore or replace any and all damaged property
including, but not limited to, landscaping, utility
lines, water lines, structures, improvements,
roadways, driveways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
parking areas (including restriping) and fences,
damaged, removed or relocated because of the
construction and/or demolition activities or other use
of the Easement.
(e) Interference With Operations.
Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the
contrary, the parties acknowledge that Grantee's
demolition and construction activities contemplated by
this Agreement, may interfere with the use and
enjoyment of Grantor's property for such time,
especially during the Grantor's Holiday sales season.
Accordingly, Grantee agrees to complete the
construction and demolition activities on the Easement
Area and all repair and restoration work required
herein within the aforementioned twenty-one calendar
day period, but in no event later than November 1,
1996. Further, if Grantee does not reasonably expect
to be able to finish all such work, including the
restoration and repair work required of it herein, by
November 1, 1996, Grantee agrees that it will not
start the work until January 15, 1997.
4. GRANTORIS RESERVATIONS. Grantor hereby
reserves the right: (i) to use the surface area of the'
Easement Area for any purpose, other than construction
of a building on the Easement Area, so long as such
use does not substantially interfere with Grantee's
rights as provided herein; the use of said surface
area for pedestrian traffic, for maintaining a parking
lot, driveway or sidewalk and/or for landscaping
("landscaping" as used in this Agreement shall not
include trees) shall be deemed not to substantially
interfere with Grantee's rights herein; and (ii) to
locate other utilities in the Easement Area subject to
the approval of Grantee, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
Grantor further reserves the right to
relocate the Easement and the facilities located
therein, from time to time, provided that (i) Grantor
-4-
ckc\mervyns\easoment
pays the reasonable costs thereof, including the cost
of relocating any sewer utility facilities installed
by Grantee in the Easement Area, and (ii) the new
location of the Easement is approved by Grantee, which
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
The rights granted to Grantee hereunder
shall be personal to Grantee only and shall not be
assignable or transferable; provided, however, that
following Grantee's completion of the demolition and
construction activities contemplated by this
Agreement, and all restoration work required hereunder
(which restoration shall have been approved by Grantor
in writing), Grantee shall have a one time right to
assign all of its right, title and interest in and to
this Agreement and Grant of Easement to the Eastern
Municipal Water District, a Municipal Water District
("EMWDII), provided that (i) Grantee shall not be
released of any of its liability or obligations
hereunder and (ii) such conveyance shall be in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B
and incorporated herein by this reference.
5. MAINTENANCE OF EASEMENT AREA. Any work
by Grantor, or anyone working through or under
Grantor, which materially adversely affects the
surface or subsurface of the Easement Area shall be
performed only after written notice by certified mail,
postage paid, addressed to Grantee at Grantee's
address set forth hereinbelow, setting forth the
proposed changes in reasonable detail. Such notice is
to be given to the Grantee at least fifteen (15) days
prior to commencement of such work and is subject to
approval by Grantee, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding
Grantor's rights under Paragraph 4 hereinabove, the
surface of the Easement Area with respect to the
distance from the ground surface to the top of any'
pipes, as of the date of this Agreement, shall not be
changed by any party hereto if it results in:
(a) "cutting or removing" the soil
which leaves less than forty-eight (48) inches of soil
over the top of the pipes; and
(b) "hauling" in of soil or "filling"
which will leave more than twelve (12) feet of soil
over the top of any pipe.
6. TERMINATION UPON ABANDONMENT. In the
event Grantee, its successors and/or assigns, shall
ckc mervyns\easernent
abandon or no longer use all or any part of the
easement rights herein granted for a period of two
years, at the request of Grantor, Grantee shall
release such easement rights to the part of the
Easement no longer used by Grantee.
7. RESTORATION UPON DAMAGE. If the
surface or the subsurface of the Easement Area or any
other part or portion of Grantor's property shall be
disturbed or otherwise damaged by Grantee or its
agents, contractors, employees or the like in
connection with the Easement, Grantee, at its sole
cost and expense, shall restore, or cause to be
restored, the surface or subsurface of the subject
property, as the case may be, to the condition the
same was in prior to the disturbance or damage, and
such restoration shall be performed with all due
diligence and dispatch pursuant to the terms set forth
herein.
S. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE. The
construction and demolition work and Grantee's use of
the Easement Area for that purpose or any other
purpose permitted hereunder and all related work and
activities thereto shall be at the risk of Grantee
alone. Grantee hereby expressly agrees to reimburse,
save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify Grantor, its
officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents,
attorneys and insurers, from and against any and all
claims, damages, expenses, judgments and liability,
injuries or death of persons (Grantee's employees
and/or agents included) and damage to property,
business or otherwise, including, without limitation,
attorneys' fees and expert costs, arising out of or
having to do with, directly or indirectly (i) the
Easement and the rights granted herein to Grantee, and
(ii) construction and demolition work performed by
Grantee in connection with this Agreement, the Grant
of Easement or the Easement created hereby. Grantee
agrees to cause its contractors to maintain reasonable
and customary insurance covering its obligations under
this Agreement with respect to workers compensation,
injury to person or property and loss of life and will
furnish Grantor with evidence of such coverage, naming
Grantor as an additional insured, before commencing
any use or occupancy of the Easement Area. The
indemnification given herein shall survive the
abandonment, expiration or early termination of this
Agreement.
-6-
ckc\mervyns@easoment
9. DEFAULT. In the event Grantee breaches
any provision of this Agreement, Grantor shall have
all of the remedies available to Grantor hereunder in
addition to all other rights and remedies which may be
available to Grantor in equity or at law.
10.MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) Grantee agrees to comply with all
applicable laws in its construction and demolition
activities and its subsequent use, operation and
maintenance of the Easement and in connection with any
other activities in connection with the Easement
and/or this Agreement.
(b) A waiver or breach of a covenant
or provision in this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of any other covenant or provision in this
Agreement and no waiver shall be valid unless in
writing and executed by the waiving party. An
extension of time for performance of any obligation or
act shall not be deemed an extension of time for any
performance of any other obligation or act.
(c) Subject to Grantee's limited right
to assign any of its rights under this Agreement, as
set forth in Paragraph 4 hereof, the parties agree
that this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of
their successors and assigns.
(d) Grantee accepts the Easement, the
Easement Area under this Agreement and Grant of
Easement in its "AS IS 11 condition and, by accepting
this Agreement and Grant of Easement, acknowledges
that Grantor has not made any representations or
warranty, actual or implied, as to the condition or
suitability of the Easement or the Easement Area for
any use.
(e) This instrument and the
Stipulation contain the entire agreement of the
parties.
(f) This Agreement is executed in and
to be performed in the State of California and shall
be construed in accordance with the laws thereof.
(g) Any headings at the beginning of
each section and subsection are solely for the
convenience of the parties and not a part of and shall
not be used to interpret this Agreement. This
-7-
ckc\mervyns\easoment
Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been
prepared by one of the parties, but rather as if both
parties had prepared it.
(h) Any notice, request, instruction
or other document to be given under this Agreement
shall be in writing and either sent by certified mail,
return receipt requested, in which case notice shall
be deemed delivered two (2) business days after
deposit, postage prepaid in the United States mail or
sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, in
which case notice shall be deemed delivered one (1)
business day after deposit with the courier, or
received by facsimile transmission or similar means if
a copy of the notice is also sent by United States
certified mail, in which case notice shall be deemed
delivered on transmittal by facsimile or other similar
means provided that a transmission report is generated
by reflecting the accurate transmission of the
notices. All notices to be given under this Agreement
shall be addressed as follows:
To Grantee:City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn:Steven Beswick
To Grantor:Peg A. Schoenfelder, Esq.
Director of Legal Services
Mervyn's
22301 Foothill Boulevard
Hayward, California 94541-2771
Mr. Mark Johnson
Manager, Existing Real Estate &
Property Administration
Target/Mervyn's
33 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Mr. Darrell Robertson
Manager, Mervyn's Store
26443 Ynez Road
Temecula, California 92591
These addressesmay be changed by written notice
to the other party provided that no notice of a change
of address shall be effective until actual receipt by
the parties of the notice.
-8-
ckc\mervyns\easoment
(i) If any term or provision of this
Agreement shall to any extent be held invalid or
unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall
not be affected.
(j) This Agreement may not be modified
or otherwise amended except by a written amendment
executed by all of the parties hereto.
(k) This Agreement shall be effective
upon execution by both parties hereto.
(1) This Agreement may be executed in
two or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, and when all of such counterpart
signatures are taken together, shall constitute one
instrument.
(m) In the event either party hereto
shall bring an action or proceeding against the other
to enforce the other party's performance hereunder,
the losing party shall pay to the successful party the
successful party's actual attorneys fees and costs,
including, but not limited to, expert witness fees.
(n) Notwithstanding the provisions of
this Agreement which require that certain actions be
taken within specified periods of time and/or be
completed by specific dates, except with reference to
the provisions of subparagraph 3(e) hereof ("Outside
Date"), said Outside Date shall be subject to
extensions of time as may be required where compliance
with the specific Outside Date or Outside Dates cannot
be met by Grantee as a result of an act of God or a
labor strike (which did not result from Granteets
breach under any applicable agreement); provided,
however, that such extension shall be memorialized by
an amendment hereto, duly executed by the parties
hereto and recorded in the appropriate real estate
records of Riverside County, California.
-9-
ckc\ rnervyns\ easement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been
executed as of the date first set forth hereinabove.
Grantor
MERVYNIS, a California corporation
By:
Its:
Grantee
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Its:
-10-
ckc\mervyns\easement
EXHIBIT A
(LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA)
-11-
c kc \ rnervyn s \easement
J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
February 27, 1995 W.O. #9012240-02
Revised: October 3,1995
EXHIBIT "A"
30'E.M.W.D. SEWER, INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROPERTY OF MERVYN'S
That portion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel
Maps, at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, lying within a strip of
land 30.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Northerly terminus of a course in the Westerly line of said Parcel 9
which bears N.25'1 5'31 "W., 466.46';
Thence N.64044'29"E., a distance of 10.00 feet to the centerline of that certain grant of
easement to Eastern Municipal Water District, recorded April 26, 1973 as Instrument No. 53391.
Official Records of Riverside County, California;
Thence Northwesterly along said centerline on a non-tangent curve concave Northeasterly,
having a radius of 1 1 90.00 feet, through an angle of 0401 8'58", an arc length of 89.64 feet, (the
initial radial line bears S.64044'29'W.) to the Point of Beginning of said centedine to be described;
Thence Northerly on a non-tangent curve concave to the East, having a radius of 1000.00
feet, through an angle of 17034'09", an arc length of 306.64 feet (the initial radial line bears
S.88112'55"W.);
Thence N. 1 0025'48'W., a distance of 91.33 feet;
Thence N. 1 1 000'00'E., a distance of 69.75 feet;
Thence N.10025'48'W., a distance of 346.53 feet to the centerline of said grant of easement
to Eastern Municipal Water District, also the termination of said centerline description.
The sidelines of said 30.00 foot strip of land shall be prolonged or shortened as to terminate
in the Westerly line and the Northerly line of said Parcel 9.
Corporate Headquarters - 1777 Atlanta Avenue, Suite G-5 - Riverside, CA 92507 - P.O. Box 493 - Riverside, CA 92502 - 909/686-0844 - FAX 909/686-5954
JFD:-JFD$ADM:[LEGAL]LEGALJD9;31MELINDAN C.* PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Temecula
February 27,1995
Revised: October 3,1995
Page 2
The above described parcel of land contains 0. 1 28 acres, more or less.
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Prepared under the supervision of:
Eip Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152
Date:
MWC/DJK/mh
JFD::JFDSADM:CLEGALILEGALJD9;31MELINDAN
o
u u
62 - F-
C3
a:
LLJ Z
<z
4i
z
cc
LU
Co
a.
lu
O<
tli 0
L)
>
LLI
a: cc
i a. x
uz
LL
cr <
LU
U)
z
5;
ui
cr
7
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 590-
of
On before me,
DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER E r, 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC
personally appeared
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/thei'r
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
l@l INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
F GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES@
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
2
C31 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park. CA 91309-7184
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 5907
State of
County of
before me,
On
DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER E.G . 'JANE DO@-. NOTARY PUBL'--
personally appeared
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
F-I INDIVIDUAL
F-l' CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TITLE(S)
I PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME -@F OE@RSONIS) OR ENT@(IES@,
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
Oc 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
Recording Requested By and
when Recorded Return to:
EXHIBIT B
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
P.O. Box 2300
San Jacinto, CA 92551-8300
Attn:
This Document Must Be Signed in
the Presence of Notary & Notarized.
NO Recording Fee Required Pursuant
to Government Code Section 27383
GRANT OF EASEMENT
The City of Temecula, a general law city (hereinafter
"Grantor") does hereby grant and convey to The Eastern
Municipal Water District, a municipal water district
("Grantee") and its successor in interest, a non-
exclusive easement, thirty (30) feet in width, in,
upon, along, under, over and across that certain real
property situated in the County of Riverside, State of-
California, legally described on Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
("Easement"), together with all of the sewer
facilities located within the Easement.
This Grant of Easement shall be subject to all of the
provisions, termsand conditions of that certain
document entitled"Agreement and Grant of Easement"
executed on Aprilf 1996, by and between Mervyn's, a
California corpora:Flon, as grantor therein
("Mer@ntsil) and Grantor herein, as grantee therein,
which instrument was recorded April r 1996, with the
Riverside County Recorder's office, Instrument Number
("Agreement"), and the Grantee's
execution of the Certificate of Acceptance attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
("Certificate of Acceptance"). By executing the
aforementioned Certificate of Acceptance, Grantee
hereby assumes and agrees to duly perform and be bound
-12-
ckc\ mervyns\ easement
by all of the terms, covenants, conditions and
obligations of the "Grantee" under the Agreement,
together with this Grant of Easement, all for the
benefit of Mervyn's, except for the following:
(i)Numbered Paragraph 3 of the Agreement; and
(ii)Numbered Paragraph 8 of the Agreement.
Nothing contained herein or omitted herefrom
shall be construed as a release of the City of
Temecula, whether express, implied or otherwise, of
its obligations, covenants, representations and/or
warranties under the Agreement, all of which shall
survive this Grant of Easement.
Grantee shall maintain the Easement and all
facilities and improvements therein and thereon and
all related work and activities thereto shall be at
the risk of Grantee. Grantee hereby expressly agrees
to reimburse, save, defend, hold harmless and
indemnify each of Mervyn's and Grantor, their
officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents,
attorneys and insurers, from and against any and all
claims, damages, expenses, judgments and liability,
injuries or death of persons (Grantee's employees,
and/or agents included) and damage to property,
business or otherwise, including without limitation,
attorneys' fees and expert costs, arising of or having
to do with, directly or indirectly the continued use
of the Easement and the facilities located therein by
Grantee and all of Grantee's activities relating to
the use and maintenance of the Easement and said sewer
facilities conveyed hereby.
Dated: 1996 CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Its: Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
-13-
ckc\ mervyns\euerrvent
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real
property conveyed by Grant of Easement dated
, 199_ from the City of Temecula, a general law city
E-o the Eastern Municipal Water District, a municipal
water district, to which this Certificate of
Acceptance is attached, is hereby accepted according
to the terms and conditions set forth therein by the
undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the Board of
Directors pursuant to the authority conferred by
Resolution Number 80 of the Board of Directors adopted
on January 14, 1953, and the Grantee consents to the
recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer or
agent.
Dated:EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT, a municipal water
district
By:
Its:
-14-
ckc mervyrs\ easement
EXHIBIT A
[LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT]
-15-
ckc\mervyns\oasemenl
J. F. Oavicison Associates, Inc.
ENGINE=-RING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTLRE
February 27, 1995 W.O. " "901 2240-02
Revised:October 3, 1995
EXHIBIT "A"
30'E.M.W.D. SEWER, INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROPERTY OF MERVYN'S
That portion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 23430, as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel
Maps, at Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, California, lying within a strip of
land 30.00 feet wide, the centerline being described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Northerly terminus of a course in the Westerly line of said Parcel 9
which bears N.25015'31'W., 466.46';
Thence N.64"44'29"E., a distance of 10.00 feet to the centertine of that certain grant of
easement to Eastern Municipal Water District, recorded April 26, 1973 as Instrument No. 53391,
Official Records of Riverside County, California; .
Thence Northwesterly along said centerline on a non-tangent curve concave Northeasterly,
having a radius of 1190.00 feet, through an angle of 04018'58 an arc length of 89.64 feet, (the
initial radial line bears S.64"44'29'W.) to the Point of Beginning of said centerline to be described;
Thence Northerly on a non-tangent curve concave to the East, having a radius of 1000.00
feet, through an angle of 17034'09", an arc length of 306.64 feet (the initial radial line bears
S.88'1 2'5 5 "W.);
Thence N. 1 0025'48"W., a distance of 91.33 feet;
Thence N.1 1000'00"E., a distance of 69.75 feet:
Thence N. 1 0"25'48"W., a distance of 346.53 feet to the centerline of said grant of easement
Munic'ipal Water DisLrict, aiso the termination of said centerline description.
The sidelines of said 30.00 foot strip of land shall be prolonged or shortened as to terminate
in the Westerly line and the Northerly line of said Parcel 9.
(:oroorate Heacc:uar,ers - 1777 Atlanta Avenue. Suite r,-5 - Riversicle. CA. 92507 - PO. Box 493 - R@verside. CA 92----.D2 =@X
@FD::jFDSADM:fL;:GAL]LEGALJD9;31MELINDAN
%J 'PIN7E,:) ON RECYCLE[) PAPER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
City of Temecula
February 27, 1995
Revised: October 3, 1995
Page 2
The above described parcel of land contains 0. 1 28 acres, more or less.
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Prepared under the supervision of:
Marissa Crowther, PLS No. 6152
Date:
MWC/DJK/mh
J F D::@'FDSA OM:(L@- GAL]L-@GALi 1)9; 31 ME LINDAN
cr
co
QC
rr,
LLi
cr
ui
LU >
0
a:
CL
CL
cc
U) cn
LU r z
-i 0
z
a:
LLI
LL
4,
Ct) ci
>
LLJ
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907
State of
County of
On before me,
DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER E.G. -JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC'
personally appeared
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - Fl, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form,
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATEOFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TrrLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT GENERAL NUMBER OF PAGES
TRUSTEE(S)
-7 GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NANIE OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
:c)l 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907
of
On before me,
DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., -JANE DOEL NOTARY PUBLIC'
personally appeared
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - j7 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed-
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TRFLE(S)
PARTNER(S) F7 LIMITED
7 GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
71OTHER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENT17Y(IES)
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
DI 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
EN4 9
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC 0
CITY MANAGER kV@
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: v April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and
Specifications for the Interim Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection
of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive - Project No. PW96-03
PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW96-03, Traffic
Signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive.
BACKGROUND:
County Assessment District 161 is proposing to widen Winchester Road from Murrieta Hot
Springs Road to Margarita Road. The street widening project will be detouring traffic from
Winchester Road onto Margarita Road. This project will provide a three-way traffic signal at
the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive and is expected to be constructed prior
to the road improvements on Winchester Road which are scheduled to begin in June. Due to
the urgency of this installation and the long lead time for the signal equipment, the traffic signal
poles, controller cabinet and controller are being ordered by the City so they will be available
to the contractor after the project has been bid.
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready
to be advertised for construction. The estimated construction cost for this project is $70,000.
The plans and specification are available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is funded through Signal Mitigation Funds.
-I- r. \agdrptk%\0423 @03.bid
ITEIN4 1 0
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIR
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for
Federal-Aid Projects for SR 15 and Overland Drive Overcrossing Project
(Project No. PW95-1 1)
PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Debbie Powell, CIP Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City CouncilAdopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001, TO
LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(001),
SR 15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the Overland Drive Overcrossing the City applied for State
construction funding under Senate Bill 300, State-Local Transportation Partnership Program.
The funds were granted through Program Supplemental No. 001 to the Local Agency/State
Agreement for State-Aid Project No. 008-5459. The California Department of Transportation
(CALTRANS) who administers the funds requires that the attached resolution be adopted in
order to receive funds under Cycle 6 (Fiscal Year 1995/96) in the amount of $588,441 which
will fund a portion of the total construction costs.
This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans
which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to
Caltrans approval.
r\agdrpt\96\0-423\sb3OOl.rrs/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and is being partially funded through Cycle 6 of the State-
Local Transportation Partnership Program (Senate Bill 300). SB300 funds have been allocated
in the amount of $588,441 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8.
ATTACHMENTSO
1.Resolution No. 96-
2.Supplement Agreement No. 001
-2- r:\mgdrpt\96\0-423\sb3OOl.rca/ajp
RESOLUTTON NO. %
A RESOLUTTON OF TBE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CrrY
OF ULA APPROVING FROGRAM SUPPL
NO. 001 TO TBE LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AG
NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATTON AND TIE[E Crff OF CULA FOR
STATE PROJECT NUMMER SLTPP-5459(001), SR
15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHER]EAS, before SMW-Aid will be made for Project No. PW95-11, Overland Drive
Overcrossing, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program
Supplement Agreement.
WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 001 allocates funding in the amount of $588,441
for Cycle 6, Fiscal Year 1995/96, for the construction of said project.
NOW RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement
No. 001 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APFROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
AT'MT:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\sb3OOl.res/aip
SEAL]
STATE OF CALIEFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERS]IDE Ss
CrrY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby ce@ that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIIL ERS:
NOES: COUNCIILMEEM13ERS:
ABSENT: - COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSTAIN: - COUNCIIL ERS:
4- r.\agdrpt\96\0423\ab3OOl.rcs/Rip
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 Date: March 31, 199 6
to Location: 08-RIV-15
Project Number: SB96-5459(001)
';TATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION EA Number: 08-354601
ARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the StaL'e-Local Trans-
portation Partnership Program Agreement for the State Share Funds which was
entered into between the Local Entity and the State on 07/29/193 and is
subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement
is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the a-@oremen-
tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved
bv the Local Entity on (See copy attached).
The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
SR 15 AND OVERLAND DRIVE INTERCHANGE
TYPE OF WORK: CONSTRUCT OVERCROSSING LENGTH: 0. 2 (Miles)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
@ Construction
Estimated Cost State Share Funds Matching Funds
FY96$ 588441 Local Other Other
$104)07500 FY97$ 0 9419059 $ 0 $ 0
FY98$ 0
Citv of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
Bv Chief, Office of Local Programs
Project Implementation
Date Date
Attest
Tltlc
I hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this an rance
Accoun@- Officer Date 588441.00
Chapter I Statute i Item Year Program I'll Fund Source A.NIOL-N'T
34)3 199-; 2660-@-o42 9S-96 20.2S.010.100 C 258010 042-T 588441.00
El-, Ioz:). -@rx Z) z -,
08-RIV-15DATE: 03/30/96
SB96-5459(001)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract
may have been written before ascertaining the availability of
legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both
parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would
occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was
made.
The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds
payable shall not exceed $ 588441 to be encumbered and
reimbursed as follows:
FY 95-96 $ 588441
FY 96-97 $ 0
FY 97-98 $ 0
Any increase in State Partnership funds will require a revised
program supplement. Any decrease in State Partnership funds will
require a revised finance letter.
2. The State Share Funds in this agreement are based on the
approved eligible application amount and represent
maximum State Funds available for this project. Actual
State Share Funds will be calculated after bid opening
and will be based on the lower of the approved eligible
application amount or the eligible award amount.
3. In accordance with the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program Guidelines dated June 8, 1994, project eligibility is
limited to contract items plus locally funded State or Local Entity
furnished materials and Supplemental Work. Supplemental Work
eligibility is further defined under the Project Eligibility section
of the Guildelines as limited to certain maximum costs and to
non-early reimbursement projects of $300,000 or less.
4. The Reimbursement Ratio for this Cycle 6 (95/96) Project is
5.88%.
Page 2 of
covnts.frx
08-RIV-15 DATE: 03/30/96
SB96-5459(001)
5. Within 120 days of project completion a Final Report of
@ enditures must be transmitted to the Caltrans
District Local Assistant Engineer.
6. A Final Audit must be completed and transmitted to the
Caltrans District Local Assistant Engineer by
December 30th (the State fiscal year following project
completion).
Page 3 of 3
covnts.frx
ITE?4 11
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 002 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for
Federal-Aid Projects for SR 15 and Rancho California Road Interchange
Improvement Project (Project No. PW95-12)
CQI
PREPARED BY: @D Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Debbie Powell, CIP Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO
LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(002),
SR 15/RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the Rancho California Interchange Improvement Project, the City
applied for State construction funding under Senate Bill 300, State-Local Transportation
Partnership Program. The funds were granted through Program Supplemental No. 002 to the
Local Agency/State Agreement for State-Aid Project No. 008-5459. The California Department
of Transportation (CALTRANS) who administers the funding requires that the attached
resolution be adopted in order to receive funds under Cycle 6 (Fiscal Year 1995/96) in the
amount of $381,130 which will fund a portion of the total construction costs.
This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans
which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to
Caltrans approval.
r. \Wrpt\%@0423\sb3OO2. res/aip
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and is being partially funded through Cycle 6 of the State-
Local Transportation Partnership Program (Senate Bill 300). SB300 funds have been allocated
in the amount of $381,130 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8.
ATTACHMENTS@
1.Resolution No. 96-
2.Supplement Agreement No. 002
-2- r.\agdrpt%96\0423\ab3OG2.res/ajp
RESOLUTION NO. %
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY
OF TEMIECLTLA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPL
NO. 002 TO THE LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT
NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN T.HE STATE DEPAR OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
STATE PROJECT NUM[BER SLTPP-5459(002), SR
15CHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CHANGE
0PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
, before State-Aid will be made for Project No. PW95-12, Rancho California
Road Interchange Improvement Project, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter
into a Program Supplement Agreement.
WHERF,AS, Program Supplement No. 002 allocates funding in the amount of $381,130
for Cycle 6, Fiscal Year 1995/96, for the construction of said project.
NOW'L MMRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program Supplement
No. 001 between the State Department of Transportation and the City of Temecula.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APFROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
A=T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r.\agdrpt\96NO423\sb3OO2.rce/ajp
SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERS]IDE Ss
CrrY OF TF2viECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby ce@ that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIILMEM13ERS:
NOES: COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIILMIEM13ERS:
4- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\mb3OO2.rea/ajp
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 Date: March 3 1, 1 9 9 6
t o Location: 08-RIV-15
Project Number: SB96-5459(002)
';TATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION EA Number: 08-354601
ARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5459
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the State-Local Trans-
portation Partnership Program Agreement for the State Share Funds which was
entered into between the Local Entity and the State on 07,,29/93 and is
subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement
is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the aforemen-
tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved
bv the Local Entity on (See copy attached).
The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERNIINT:
SR 1-5 AND RANCHO CKLIFOFNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE
TYPE OF WORK: MODIFY INTERCHANGE LENGTH: 0. 6 (miles)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
@ construction
Estimated Cost State Share Funds Matching Funds
FY96$ 381130 Local Other Other
$6481800 FY97$ 0 $6100670 $ 0 $ 0
FY98$ 0
City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
By Chief, Office of-Local Programs
Project Implementation
Date Date
Attest
Tide
I hereby Certify upon my personal )mcywlodge that budgeted funds are available for this on ramce
Accountinc, Officer Date 381130.00
Chapter I Statute i Item Year Program BCI Fund Source I A.VIOUN'T
31)3 1995 2660-12:,-042 9S-96 20.25.010.100 C 258010 042-T 381130.00
supp. @lrx Page 1 o i-: 3
08-RIV-15DATE: 03/30/96
SB96-5459(002)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract
may have been written before ascertaining the availability of
legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both
parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would
occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was
made.
The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds
payable shall not exceed $ 381130 to be encumbered and
reimbursed as follows:
FY 95-96 $ 381130
FY 96-97 $ 0
FY 97-98 $ 0
Any increase in State Partnership funds will require a revised
program supplement. Any decrease in State Partnership funds will
require a revised finance letter.
2. The State Share Funds in this agreement are based on the
approved eligible application amount and represent
maximum State Funds available for this project. Actual
State Share Funds will be calculated after bid opening
and will be based on the lower of the approved eligible
application amount or the eligible award amount.
3. In accordance with the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program Guidelines dated June 8, 1994, project eligibility is
limited to contract items plus locally funded State or Local Entity
furr-@-shed materials and Supplemental Work. Supplemental Work
eligibility is further defined under the Project Eligibility section
of the Guildelines as limited to certain maximum costs and to
non-early reimbursement projects of $300,000 or less.
4. The Reimbursement Ratio for this Cycle 6 (95/96) Project is
5.88%.
Page 2 of 3
covnts.frx
08-RIV-15 DATE: 03/30/96
SB96-5459(002)
5. Within 120 days of project completion a Final Report of
Expenditures must be transmitted to the Caltrans
District Local Assistant Engineer.
6. A Final Audit must be completed and transmitted to the
r-'altrans District Local Assistant Engineer by
December 30th (the State fiscal year following project
completion).
Page 3 of 3
covnts.frx
ITEIN4 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Program Supplement No. 008 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for
Federal-Aid Projects for the Barrier Rail at Front Street and Empire Creek
(PW95-17)
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO
LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-
5459(007), BARRIER RAIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE
CREEK
BACKGROUND:
The City applied for Federal Funding to construct a barrier rail on each side of Front Street at
Empire Creek. The funds have been granted and allocated through Program Supplement No.
008 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 08-5459.
This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans
which require that the local agency advertise, award, and administer the project subject to
Caltrans approval.
Funds for the construction of this project have been allocated in the amount of $9,184 and will
be administered by Caltrans, District 8.
pwO4/r:Xagdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement project and is being funded through the Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). HBRR funds have been allocated in the
amount of $9,184 and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 96-
Supplement Agreement No. 008
-2- pwO4/r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTTON OF THE Crff COUNCIIL OF THE CITY
OF ULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT
NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTAT10N AND THE CITYOF TEMECULA FOR
FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-5459(007), BARRIER
RAIIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
, before Federal-Aid will be made available for Project No. PW95-17, Barrier
Rail at Front Sreet and Empire Creek, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter
into a Program Supplement Agreement.
, Program Supplement No. 008 allocates funding in the amount of $9,184 for
the construction of said barrier rafl project.
NOW,'L @R, BE rr RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1.That the City Council approve and authorize execution of Program
Supplement Agreement No. 008 between State Department of
Transportation and the City of Temecula.
Section 2.Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement
Section 3.The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
A=T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
pwO4/r:\agdrpt\9 6\0423\pw9 5-1 7.sup
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALHURNIA
COUNTY OF ]]DE ss
CrrY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No.96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996 by the following vote:
AM: - COUNCIIL ERS:
NOES: - COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSENT- - COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSTAIN: - COUNCIL ERS:
-2- pwO4/r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-17.sup
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008
to
LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-54S9
Date:March 20, 1996
Location:08-RIV-0-TMCA
Project Number: STPLX-5459(007)
E.A. Number: 08-955833
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency
and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. approved by the Local Agency on
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON FRONT STREET AT EMPIRE CREEK, BRD. #56C-
384@
TYPE OF WORK: INSTALL BRIDGE BARRIER RAIL LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
[ I Preliminary Engineering [ I Right-of-Way
[XI Construction Engineering [XI Construction
Estimated Costj Federal Funds Matching Funds
Local OTHER OTHER
10375 33D $ 9184 $ 1191 $ 0 $ 0
BRP $ 0
City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By By
Chief, Office of Local Programs
Project Implementation
Date Date
Attest
Title
.-.---by -er:,,@y upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
Accounting Offic Date -3 . $9184.00
Chapter! Statutes Item Yea Program IBCI Fund Source AMOUNT
303 199S 2660-101-890 95-96 20.30.010.810 c 262040 892-F 9184.00
Page 1 of 2
08-RIV-0-TMCA DATE: 03/20/96
STPLX-5459(007)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1.All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be
performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required
for efficient operation of the completed improvements.
2.The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Office of Local
Programs.
3.The Local Agency will advertise, award and administer this
project in accordance with the current Local Program Procedures
or the new Local Programs Manual, when issued.
4.This agreement supplements the Local Agency-State Master
Agreement for Federal-Aid projects, with the understanding that
all provisions of the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act (ISTEA) apply.
5.in executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal-Aid Program.
6.Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili-
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in
CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 of 2
ITEIN4 13
APPROATAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREOOFT-
CITY MANAGER@)
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1995
SUBJECT:Award of Contract for the Rancho California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive
Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-25
PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scot Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1 .Award a contract for the construction of the Rancho California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive
Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-25 to Gosney Development, for $27,430.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $2,743.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On March 12, 1996 the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Rancho
California Road/Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Project No. 5, PW95-23. This project bid with
an alternative bid to construct a sidewalk on the north side of Rancho California from Lyndie
Lane to 500 feet west. Currently the developer of the property at Rancho California Road and
Lyndie Lane is building a Texaco gas station. The developer is conditioned to install sidewalk
along the entire frontage of the property. When the developer completes the required
improvements there will be no need for the City to construct the alternative bid. Therefore, it
is recommended that only the base bid be awarded.
The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $40,000.
-1- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-25.awdajp
Twelve (1 2) bids for the project were publicly opened on April 4, 1 996 and the results for the
base bid are as follows:
BASE BID ALTERNATIVE
NO. CONTRACTOR ($) 11 ($)
1 Gosney Development 27,430.00 6,000.00
2 Sean Malek 29,870.00 7,475.00
3 Gosney Construction 31,012.00 7,310.00
4 Utility Equipment 34,224.00 8,553.00
5 Hilicrest Contracting 34,955.00 6,260.00
6 E.A. Mendoza 35,415.00 6,520.00
7 lnterwest Pacific 35,400.00 9,200.00
8 Elite Bobcat 38,167.58 7,775.00
9 Comino Irvine Co. 38,520.00 8,890.00
10 J. D. C., I n c. 39,060.00 5,105.00
11 Chino Construction 40,260.00 5,760,001
12 West Coast Construction 42,220.00 6,900.00],
Gosney Development has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other
areas in Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 30 working days. Work is expected to begin mid-May and be
completed by the end of June, 1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will receive 80% in SB821 funds which are
administrated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The balance will be funded
by the City through Development Impact Fees - Public Facilities. Funds are available in Account
No. 210-165-661-5804 for the construction contract and contingency amounts of $27,430.00
and $2,743.00 for a total of $30,173.00.
ATTACHMENTS*
Contract
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-25.awdajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-25
RANCHO CALIFORNIAISANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23rd day of April, 1996, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and GOSNEY
DEVELOPMENT , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
l.a.CONTRACT DOCUME@ The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-
25, RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of
California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version
of the Standard Soecifwcations for Public Works Construction, including all supplements
as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications') as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-25, RANCHO
CALIFORNIAISANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General,
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-
25, RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in
lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed
completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless
otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools,
CONTRACT CA-1 r: \cip \ projects\pw 9 5- 25\co ntract
equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-25
RANCHO CALIFORNIA/SANTA CECILIA SIDEWALK PROJECT NO. 5
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Twenty-
seven thousand four hundred and thirty DOLLARS and No CENTS ($27,430.00), the
total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Thirty (30)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5.cHANGE6RDERs. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6.PAYMENTS,
A.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30)
days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
B.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
CONTRACT CA-2 r: \cip\p rojects\pw 95- 25 \contract
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
C.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMO@ RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
$25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3%
$75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount
in excess of $500,000
8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1 777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
CONTRACT CA-3 r: \cip\p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11.TIME OF THF F;SFN(F. Time is of the essence in this contract.
1 2.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site Of CO-,STruction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
1 3.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
1 5.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stai.-@7 - that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcortractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either !abor or materials, except certain items, if 3ny, to be set forth ;r,
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
1 6.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
1 7.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
1 8.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
CONTRACT CA-4 r: \cip \ p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
21.ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 1 01 -
336, as amended.
22.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theparties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
Gosney Development
James Gosney
17434 Holly Drive
Fontana, California 92335
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-6 r: \cip\p rojects\pw95- 25\co ntract
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw95-25\contract
ITEIA 14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake Alteration between
California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Pala
Road Bridge over Temecula Creek
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration
(Notification No. 5-044-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City
of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign said Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the proposed construction of Pala Road/Temecula Creek Bridge, the
Environmental Studies pursuant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code have been
completed. Based on that study, it has been determined that fish and wildlife may be effected
by the proposed construction. The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the study and
is proposing certain mitigating measures as conditions of the permit.
The various mitigation measures are described in the attached agreement. Riverside County
Transportation and Land Development Agency, Transportation Department has been the lead
agency during the environmental process. After reviewing the proposed 'Agreement' it was
their opinion that the extension provisions of Condition No. 4 should be 24 months in lieu of
the proposed 12 months. Current provisions anticipate the completion of the project by 1998,
with 12 month extension, the completion (termination of this agreement) is anticipated by not
later than 1999. The additional 12 month extension anticipates completion by the year 2000.
Although we do not share their concern, we did not discourage their request to the Department
of Fish and Game for such modifications. If the Department of Fish and Game agrees to such
modification, it is the request of the staff to so modify the Agreement without any further
action by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is estimated that the total cost for compliance with subject agreement would not exceed
$750,000, shared equally by the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. The City's
portion is estimated not to exceed $350,000. A portion of the necessary funding has been
included for the environmental portion of the project in the Fiscal Year 1995-96 CIP Budget and
proposed for the balance of funding in the Fiscal Year 1997-98 CIP Budget.
-I- r.\agd@\96\0423 agr/ajp
ATTACHMENTSG
1 . Letter: Riverside County to Department of Fish and Game
2.Agreement Department of Fish and Game and City of Temecula
-2- r-\agdrpt\96\0423@agr/aip
IFriday April 12, 1996 9:37wn -- Froin 1909 788 61981 -m Page 21
Apr.12.1996 10:52AM NATIONAL B/M DEMO No.0749 P. 2/2
COUNTY OF RWERS]IDE
T SPORTA77ON
L4ND AGEMENT AGENCY
David E- Barnitart
@ansportafic)n Department Direcror of 7ransporiation
April 9, 1996
Udorru,LDepw=ent offish W Gam
330 Golden Shore, Suite 50
Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn:Doe Sudduth
SUBJECT; Sbed Altem6on agreement NOtirlcxtion # 5-044-96
]PjtlaRoad Bridge (Temecula Creek) RePlAcementProject
Dear Dee,
in receipt of the above agreement
The City of Temecula and the Transportation Depmtmerit are of the agre=ent,
foir the Pala Road Bridge project In general we are satisfied with the tenm
with one exception. Condition # 4 allows for only one, one year extension to the agreement prior
to its expirafion on July 30, 1998. We are tly in the process of complying with Section 106
of the National lestoric Properties Act required due to the projects federal fun&mg. Since the
delays associated with compliancewith Section 106 can be lengthy and difficult to anticipate, we
ask that the City of Ternecula be given the possibility of two (2), one year cxt@ons on the
agreement.
Please feel free to caU me at (909)275-2016 if you have any questions or wish to discuss this
fbr all your help.
or Planner
Donovan, IZCTD
k4cphy,ic4lc. City of T@la
pawil J@ Ogam EFS
file
4080 Lemon Street, Sth Floor - Riverside, California @01 - (909) 275-6740
P-0. Box 1090 - Riversidt, California 92502-IOW I FAX (909) 275-6721
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
330 Golden Shore, Suite 50
Long Eeach, Cal-ifcrr-ia 90SC2
Notification No. 5-044-96
AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STREAM OR LAKE ALTERATION
-.'@IS LGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Devartmen--
74-s'- and Game, hereinafter call-ed the Department, and name: jose-@h K4---ak,
Director, representing: City of Temecula, address: 43174 Business Park
Temecula, CA 92590, nhone: (909) 694-6411, County of Riverside, State of
California, hereinafter called the Operator, is as follows:
WH---REAS,iDurs,aant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code, the
OiDerator, on the 7th day of February, 1996, notified the Department that thev
intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed, channel-,
or bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) of, the following water(s):
Temecula Creek of Riverside County, tributary to Santa Margarita River,
located south o@ Highway 79, at Pala Road. Section -, Townshin 8 S, Range
@" W, USGS Map Temecula and Pechanga.
WF-EREAS, the Department (represented by Dee Sudduth, who has made an
Inspection of subject area on the day of 1996) has
determined that such operations may substantially adversely affect ex4-sting
fish and wildlife resources including: those songbirds, raptors, other birds,
mammals, reptiles, amphibians, plants, and all other aquatic resources and
wildlife in the streambed/lake and associated area affected by the proposed
project in this agreement.
7w---REFOP---, the Department hereby proposes measures to vrotect -fish and
resources during the operator's work. The O-Derator herebv agrees to
accerz the -following measures/cond4-t@-ons as part of the nropcsed work.
--f the Onerator's work changes from that stated i--i the notification specified
a@o-,re, tnis agreement is no longer valid and a new notil@-cat@-cr. shall be
submitted to the Denartment of Fish and Game. Failure to comply wi---h the
-crcv--s--ons of this agreement and with other Der,@inent code sections, including
'-u:: no:: !---m'-ted to Fish and Game Code Sections S650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may
result --n prosecution.
--n --'-4-s agreement au--hor@-zes the ODeratcr to tresnass on any land or
no-- does @--. relieve the ODeral@cr of resnonsibil@--v for com-ol4-ance
ar-zl--cable --Federa'-, state, or lo--al laws or ordinances. A consummated
h --
a@reemen-- does not constitute Devar--mert of Fish and Game endorsement of @he
@--O'CCS=-Q operation, or ass-are .he Depar@men--'s concurrence with Derm'-ts
---rom other auencies,
NA
L-@@7-@-M---NT E7-@-OM7-S -7FFECT---@E ON DATE OF D7-P@,TMENT'S S--@G T@,-7 -a2@
Juiv 30, 1998, For the zropcsed project onlv. The Onerazo- may
r=-@esz an e,-:tens,-cr- of --he agreement annual',%, for a month period if
cors@ructicn time is necessary. The extens4-cn sha--!- be requested
--For @c t-e termination date of --he agreement. This agreement sha remain
-or that t-me necessary to saz--s-@-v the terms/@ond'-t'-cns of @h--s
a@--eemen@.
Pace -- of '-:
S--REAMEEZ) COli--@-'-"IONS FOR NO-LIF 7CATION @BER:
-.he -following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and
resolved by this agreement. The signing of this agreement does not 4-rnziv that
--he Or)erator is precluded 'rom doing other activities at the site. '-oweier,
activities no-. soecif4-caliv aareed to and resolved bv this agreement, sqall !De
sub@lect to seoarate notification nursuant to Fish an@ Game C;de 7----co et sea..
The Operator nronoses to a'-ter the following streambed: Tenec,,:!-a Cree@:, to
Der-@orm the -@ol'-owina work: Construction of a new 94 foot 9 --ich wide 1-ane
bridge and associated road realignment immediately upstream of the e%:isl-.-g
Pro-ocsed project ac-aid result in a total of 1.49 acres c-@-ner-nanen@
im-cacr- including 0.13 acres of southern willow scrub, 1.2E acres o:: r--r)ar,-an
woodland and 0.7- acres of sparsely vegetated channel. 3.4S acres of zemocrar,.,
impacts include 0.74 acres of southern willow scrub, '..EC acres of r@-narian
-woodland and C.!!- acres o: szarsely vegetated channel, as described -n the
submitted application.
The agreed work includes activities associated with No. 2 above. The prc@ect
area -is located in the I-cllow'-ng streambed Temecula Creek, Riverside Coun-.v,
located approximately as follows: at Pala Road just south of Highway 79. Sect4-or-
I Township 8 S, Range 2 W, USGS Map Temecula and Pechanga.
Sz)eci4@-c work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the loans and
documents submitted by the operator and shall be implemented as proposed, un-ess
directed di--F@@erent-iv by this agreement.
4. The Operator shall request an extension of this agreement -orior to its
termination. Extensions may be granted for up to 12 months from the date of
termination of .he agreement a.-id are subject to DeDartmenr-al approval. The
extension request ana fees shall be submitted to the Department's Region 5 Office
at the above address. if the Ozerator fails to request the extension prior 'to
the agreement's termination, then the Operator shall submit a new notification
with -fees and required information to !--he Denartment. The Operator may request
up to one extensions of this agreement. Any activities conducted under an
expired agreement are a violation of Fish & Game Code Section 1600 et.sec..
5. The Operator certifies by signing this agreement that the project site has
been surveyed and shall not impact any rare, threatened or endangered species; or
the Operator certifies that such a survey is not required for the proposed
project. If rare, threatened or endangered species occur within the proposed
work area, or could be impacted by the work proposed, this agreement shall not be
valid and the Operator shall not proceed with the project until the Operator
consults with the Department and obtains any required State and/or Federal
pe=its.
6.U7.a-jc'@dahle @-m@ac@s to wetlands shall be mitigated for bv the creation,
reservation and revegeta--icn of 9.41 acres of riparian wood--and a,-Id scrub. The
i.45 acres of oermanen-@ Impacts shall be mitigated for throuah a combination of
s4-@e creazi . or- and a 3:! off site reservation. The @.45 acres of
t:em-ocrar-,, -moac@s sha' 7- be 7.@-@@-cTated bv reveqe--ation on site a@- a 1:1 ratio.
s --e -creserirat 4-c7. of acres shall be 7-ccated in --he r@-nar@-an
on DroDert%7 e;h'ch sha--,.'- be n,,irchased bv the C---v
a---; Protected in znrough a conservation easement.
of Temecula s-a7--- za--c-@ase a,-id Preserve in an off
2cr ::ae creation c@- '-.49 acres cz ricar--an wcod:-ana a--ic
-@or z)ermanen: Impacts. The 7-ocat@-oi and of the
as we7-'- as --he creation =!-an shall he sub-ecz --o the review and a-o-croial of the
De-oar-,zmenz
- o r -- c -o,-, r c -,ia s e
@'z)era--cr s-a7--- --.-zlement a'-!- --rc%7@@s--cns of the Pala Road @r--dae
Prc-ec@ -,qe@'-and Plan -crer)ared I-v lgder, ar-a
@-ner@%- Ser-,r@-ces Co., :-c. dated Dece,,=er 22, 1995.
--'-e C4-t:-@- s-@a!7- '---re a e.,:per@---nced i-- -,ve----,an,-4 restoration -for
@,--eaz--cn and restc)ra----cn -L--ojec@s.
Page 3 of 5 (5-044-96)
n those zro-4ec- areas where nesting birds may occur, the Ooeratcr either
shall no-. removepotential nesz@-nct riparian vegetation from March !S t-rcuun
September 15, orshall suriey all potential nesting r@---oar4-an vegetation w@-th@-:-
the project sitefor active bird nests. If an active bird nest is located the
nest-- site shal--be flagged or staked a Minimum of 5 yards in all.d4---ect@-cns, and
--his flagged zone shall not be disturbed until the nest becomes :.nact@@@.7e, unless
otherwise directed bv the Der)artmert (re@'.: Fish and Game Codes 35c@-, 3-@cl--.-71.
7c a-,,old direct @Tnr)ac-s to southwestern pond turtle during construct'--
tc--alof two sur,,,evs for southwestern pond turtle shall be conducted
Ma-,7,7une and July nesting period to identi-lv pond turtle activity within
suitable we,-la.-id habitats and adjacent uoland areas that could he used -@3r
nesting at least 500 feet of the impac- zone. All surveys shall- -ce
conducted bv a qualified b4-cloaist. Anv pond turtles found shal7- be cartared an_;
relocated bv the qualified biologist an@ all information on the relocation ana
numbers moved shall be reported to the Department in a timely manner.
'-3. The construction area shall be conspicuously marked through fencing or
flagging and all workers shall be given training on working in and around
sensitive wetiand habitats.
'-4. -Tle removal or disturbance of soil, vegetation and vegetative debris from
the szreambed or bank shall not exceed the limits aouroved by the DeiDarzmenz, or
as described in the submitted application.
15. @.reas of disturbed soils with slopes toward a stream shall be stabilized to
reduce erosion potential. where possible, stabilization shall include the
revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area.
Plant'-,-g, seeding and mulching is conditionally acceptable. where suitable
vegetation cannot reasonably be expected to become established, ncn-erod4ble
materials may be used for such stabilization. All rip - rap identified in the
nro@ect c7-ans shall- he buri-ed with native soil to allow for a cover of native
n'-a.-zs to reestablish.
'E. Geos,,rnthetic soil stabilization fabrics shall be des4g.-Iod into the T)roject
to en-ance road bed stability within wetiand areas and to reduce or e7-imira- -ed
overexcava-lion, undercutting and similar techniques.
'jeh,-cles shall not be driven or equipment operated in water covered portions
of a stream or lake or in wetted areas, or where wetland vegetation, riparian
%reoez:az--on, or a@ati-c or=anl-sms mav be destroyed, exceot as otherwise uro-v@-ded
@cr-ne agreement: and as necessary to complete authorized work.
'-@-n@,Lh, width, and height dimensions shall not exceed those of the
andor the or,-g'---ial- r-atura!7v occurr4---la -@ooogra-c'nv, contour,
shall- be limited to the minimal amount necessary to
a----cm@-isnaareed acz@-%r'-t@-es; fil'- construction materials other @har. on-s@-te
sha- consist of c'- -an uncontaminated soil, s4l--'ree gravel, and/'or
--x--ent as descr--zea in the submitted application or as otherwise
in -.---s agreement.
4
r@mc7ied from the size sha7-l- r-c@ be
s@r@-a,r-oed,,cree.@: or on ---s bank. The sites selected on which to Dusi-
cut of the stream should be selected in compliance with -.he other
c: ::n--s agreeme7@::. Where possible, suitable @r,-,sr. @i.Les ma,,, be
actreemen-- does ,aot authorize the construction of anv temr)orarv or
per-@anen-. za,-., structure, -Flow restriction or exceidt as described 4@r-@ the
@Derat:@r's -:L-av zemocrar,,r a'am, art--@ --- c--al obstruction, or other
r-@w sna,- ze cc@szructed -from. materials, such as clean c-ravel or
sand-bacs, -4---ch w--'-' caase little or -io siltation. necessary,
ow r-iiersicns
:1prevent pcl7ut4on, minimize siltation a.-id
abe done in a manner that shal'-
wh--@'@shall @rc-,@--de -'lows to downstream reaches. Flows to downstream reac--s
S@a@e orc,,"-aec aurina a!--- times thar- 'he natura' flow would have su@r)c-
-::ed
Said -flows shall- be of sufficient aual-4-tv and cruantitv to sunnor@
a--@a@--c -i-@e bot:- above an'- below the diversion. Normal -flows sha@@@- be
-eszore--; to @@.e s--rea,-n immeciazeiv upon completion of work at that location.
Page 4 of 5
21. Precautions to minimize turbidity/siltation shall be taken into account
during project planning and implementation. This may requ@-e that the work site
!De isolated and /or the construction of silt catchment basins, so that s@-',-t, or
other deleterious materials are not allowed to pass to downstream reaches. --he
c@7-aceme,.it of any structure or materials in the stream for this -ourr)cse, ,ot
included "in the original project descri:)tl . on, shall be cocrd--.-.ated with
DeT)artment. Coordination shall i,-iclude-the negotiation of add--@--cna-- agreement
provisions.
@-2. Uoon Z)enar,:ment determination .hat ti-,rb@-d@-ty/s@-itat@-on levels resu@-t-na from.
pro3 . ect related constitute a threat to acruatic life, activities
associated with the ti-,rb@-d@-@y/s,-Itation, shall be halted until effective
Denarzment avnro,.red control devices are ias-.alled, or abatement: procedures are
'n tated.
- 2. -
--3. Spc@-7- sites shall not be located within a stream/lake, where spc47 can be
washed back into a stream/lake, or where it will cover acruatic or riparian
--egezat@-on. The Operator mav remove all human generated debris, such as lawr. and
--arm cuttings, garbace and trash.
-'4. Strictures and associated materials, including debris, not designed @o
W'-,z:hstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the hign water mark
before such -Flows occur.
.75. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any stream channel or
lake mar-gin where petroleum products or other pollutants from the ecrlipment may
enter these areas under anv flow.
2@. The Operator shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All
contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall
be the responsibility of the cderator to ensure compliance.
The ci-ean-up of all Pollution spills shall begin immediately. The O-Derator
shall no@@--@v the Department immediately o-@- any slills and shall consult with the
DeDartment regarding clean-up procedures and re @ rements.
26. debris, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, salt, cement or concrete or
wash@-ngs thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other
netr--Ieum products, or any other substances resulting from -Droject related
activities which could be hazardous to aquatic life or waters of the state shall
be =reve-l-ed from contaminating the so4-l and/or entering the waters of --he state.
@Nc-ie of these materials s-all be a'-lowed to enter into or be solaced within or
where the-@ may enter or be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the state.
when onera---@ors are completed, anv excess materials or debris shall be removed
from the work area. No r,-,bbis' s hall be denos@ted within 1-50 Feet of the high
water marl@ of anv stream or lake.
provisions of this agreement remain in force Ihroucrhout the term of the
a---eemen--. -@.v Dro-,r--sions of the agreement mav be amended or the agreement ma,.
'-e terminated at anv time nrovided such amendment and/or termination is a(zreed to
!D,.- both Larz:l . es. !,Iatualiv a=r)roved amendments become Dart of @ne
@ri@ina- aa--eemen-- and are subject to all'- nrevi-ous7-y negctiazea nro-visic-is.
the Onerazor c-- ar--,, of the individuals me-it4-cned above, c'-, a t e anc
terms or of th--s agreement, a'-! work shall terminate 4-mmed--a-@e7v
s,a7-'- not @roceed the Department has taken all@ of its legal ac-_iclis.
T'-& DeDarznen'@ reseries the right to enter the nro:ect site at an-@ time to
COMIO--ance w----h c-I -this agreement.
@nera@cr shall provide a copy of this agreement to all contractors,
subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the agreement
shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active
work and must be @resenzed --c anv DeT)a--zmen-- personnel, or persor.,nel from another
ace-c-,,@ -ncn deranz.
Page 5 of..S (5-044-96)
33. The Operator shall notify the Demartment, in writing, at least five (5) days
prior to initiation of construction (project) activities, and at least five (5)
days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification
shall be sent to the Department at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA
90802, Attn: Environmental Services.
34. The Department reserves the right to susz)end and/or revoke this agreement
the Department determines that the circumstances warrant. The circumstances that
could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the -Following:
a.--a4lure to comply with the terms/ccnditions of this
agreement.
b.The information crovided bv the Operator in supcort of the
Notif@-caticn/Agreement is determined by the Department to be
i-.icommlete, or inaccurate.
C.When new information becomes available to the Der)artment
reoresentative(s) that was not known when preua--ing the
original terms/conditions of this agreement.
d.--he project as described in the Noti'@cation/Agreement has
changed, or conditions affecting fi-sh and wildlife resources
change.
CONCURRENCE:
City of TemeculaCalifornia Department of
Fish and Game
Joseph Kicak Dee Sudduth
(signature) (date) (signature) (date)
Environmental Specialist III
(title) (title@,@
EIA 15
7
4
.It
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORN
FINANCE DIRE
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/Citv Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Construction Cooperative Agreement, State of California, County of
Riverside, City of Temecula - 1-1 5/SR 79(S)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the State of
California, County of Riverside and City of Temecula, Route 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange Junction
Agreement No. 8-932, 08303-350510.
BACKGROUND:
County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency, Transportation Department,
as part of Assessment District 1 59 included improvements to 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange. The
original proposal for this project by the Assessment District was to widen the SR 79(S) under
the 1-1 5 Bridge and continue the transition to Front Street on its current alignment. In addition,
it proposed to widen the northbound on/off ramps of 1-1 5 (east side of 1-1 5). The remaining
required improvements, the widening of the southbound on/off ramps and the signal installation
on both sides of 1-1 5 at the on/off ramps was the responsibility of the City. In Fiscal Year
1995-96 Capital Improvement Budget, City Council approved $500,000 for the City's portion
of the cost.
In reviewing the plans for the above proposed project, it became apparent that the design by
AD159 did not take into consideration the proposed connection of the Western By-Pass
Corridor to subject interchange. If the project was to be constructed as proposed by AD 1 59,
large portion of those improvements would require removal in conjunction with the Western By-
Pass Corridor construction and realignment of Front Street.
Staff has been negotiating with the County and Caltrans staff to make provisions for the
ultimate improvement of the realignment of Front Street and connection of the Western By-Pass
to 1-1 5/SR 79(S) interchange. These negotiations have been on-going for approximately nine
(9)months, resulting in the following:
1 .Caltrans approving the City's concept and authorizing the design of the project subject
to City adopting a resolution committing to ultimate improvement of the southbound
on/off ramp system. This resolution (Resolution No. 96-36) was adopted by the City
Council on March 26, 1996.
r.\agdrpt\96\0423\il5-79s.aWajp
2.Consultant to submit plans to Caltrans for the proposed revisions. These plans were
submitted for Caltrans review on April 15, 1996.
3.An agreement (verbal) between the County of Riverside and City of Temecula to jointly
fund the proposed four (4) million dollar project, with the contribution of $2.8 million
from the County and $1.2 million from the City. A formal agreement will be presented
to the City Council as soon as available. It is anticipated that such an agreement will
be completed before June 30, 1996.
It should also be recognized that the completion of this project may be prior to the beginning
of construction of the Western By-Pass Corridor. However, every effort will be made to
coordinate the construction of the two (2) projects to minimize inconvenience to the public.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Previously budgeted amount of $500,000 for the City's portion of the project must be
augmented by an additional $700,000 for the City's share of $1.2 million. Anticipated source
of funds is the Development Impact Fee Funds. This amount will be proposed by staff during
the Fiscal Year 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program budget consideration.
ATTACHMENTSE
Agreement
-2- r.\agdrpt\96\0423\il5-79s.sWajp
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
T SPORTATION AND
D AGEMENT AGENCY
Transportation Department David E. Barnhart
Director of Transportatiori
September 28, 1995
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca 92590
Attn:Mr. Joe Kicak
Re:Assessment District No. 159
SR 79 South Junction - Construction Cooperative Agreement
Dear Joe:
Attached, for your council's approval, are four (4) originals of the Caltrans Construction
C,
Cooperative A -reement for the above referenced project. The County of Riverside si uned the
attached agreement on Tuesday, September 26, 1995.
ZD
Please contact me once the City Council has sioned this agreement. The County has made
arrangements to hand deliver this document to the Caltrans District 8 office in San Bernardino for
final signatures by the State.
Please contact me at (909) 275-2091 if you have any questions, or require additional information.
Sincerely,
D. Kelley I
Project Manacer, Assessment District No. 159
DKD:dkd
xc:Dave Barnhart, RCTD
Tek Tanaka. RC7D
Joe Reyes, TPC
file
file: SR79 Coop. Acmt. Transmittal #1
4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor - Riverside, California 92501 - (909) 275-6740
P.O. Box 1090 - Riverside, Ciiiifornia 9'-1502-1090 - FAX (909) 275-6721
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOAR]? OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM:T@/Transportation SUBMMALDATE: August 29, 1995
SUBJECT:
Construction Cooperative Agreement between the County of Riverside
and State of California for the construction of Route 79 at I-15
South Junction in Assessment District No. 159.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
That the Board approve and direct the Chairperson to execute the
attached Construction Cooperative Agreement between the County of
Riverside and the State of California for the construction of Route
79 at I-15 South Junction in Assessment District No. 159.
BACKGROUND:
The County has sold bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of
1915 for improvements within Assessment District No. 159. The
County desires to construct State highway improvements consisting
of widening the north bound interchange ramps, and widening State
Route 79 South from two-lanes to an ultimate six-lane highway from
the I-15/SR79 Interchange easterly to Butterfield Stage Road.
VI The County desires to prepare the contract documents and advertise,
award and administer the construction contract for the future
phases of State Route 79 South. The State is agreeable to the
County's proposal. The attached Construction Cooperative Agreement
defines the terms and conditions under which the State Route 79
South project is to be constructed and maintained.
@vid E@arnhart
FINANCIAL DATA: Director of Transportation
0
LU CURRENT YEAR COST $ HA
:> ANNUAL COSTS HA
,o NET COUNTY COST $ HA
cr C) IN CURRENT YEAR BUDGET: YES -NO X
0.0
0- RCE OF I-UNDS: AD 159 Bond Proceeds BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES NOJC FOR FY: 95/96
< It -
MZ
a: D OMMENDATION: APPROVE
participation by the City of
will be negotiated prior to bid
Administrative Officer Signature
MINU-TES OF THE BOARD OF SUPEIZN'ISORS
On motion of Supervisor Ceniceros, seconded by Super%,isor
@@ilson and dul@r carried by unanimous vote, IT WAS ORDERED that the
abo,.-e niatter is approved as recommended.
.4 %@e s: Buster, Ceniceros and Wi'Lsc)n
,Noes: None Gerald A.
Absent:Tava@lione and Mullen
FORM ll(%@ 7M) Date: September 26, 1995
xc: TLMA, Co.Co., Auditor Deptit3,
DISTRIBLJTION:K. Donovan w/agreements, Fiscal Office
CLERK'S COPY
$iP 2 6 1995
08-Riv-15-3.2/3.7
Route 15/79 I.C. South Junction
District Agreement No. 8-932
08303 - 350510
CONSTRUCTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, entered into on is between
the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by aAd- through its Department of
Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political
subdivision of the State of
California, referred to herein as
COUNTY.
and
CITY OF TEMECULA, a body politic
and a municipal corporation of the
State of California, referred to
herein as CITY.
RECITALS
(1)STATE, COUNTY and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative
Agreement for improvements to State highways within CITY.
(2)COUNTY desires to construct State highway improvements
consisting of widening and signalizing existing ramps and
widening on Route 79 at I-15 South Junction, referred to
herein as PROJECT, and COUNTY and CITY are willing to fund
one hundred percent (100%) of all capital outlay and
staffing costs, except that costs of STATE's oversight of
construction activities will be borne by STATE.
(3)COUNTY desires to prepare the contract documents and
advertise, award, and administer the construction contract
for PROJECT in order to bring about the earliest possible
completion of PROJECT; and CITY is willing to allow COUNTY
to assume lead responsibility for constructing PROJECT.
SEP 2 6 M5
District Agreement No. 8-932
(4)STATE is agreeable to COUNTY's proposal to prepare the
contract documents and advertise, award, and administer the
construction contract for PROJECT.
(5)The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and
conditions under which PROJECT is to be constructed,
financed and maintained.
(6)Project development responsibilities for PROJECT were
covered in a prior Cooperative Agreement executed by STATE
and COUNTY on May 22, 1990, District Agreement No. 8-690,
Document No. 7179.
SECTION I
COUNTY AGREES:
(1)To advertise, award and administer the construction contract
for PROJECT in accordance with requirements of the State
Contract Act and the California Labor Code, including its
prevailing wage provisions. Workers employed in the
performance of work contracted for by COUNTY, and/or
performed under Encroachment Permit, are covered by
provisions of the Labor Code in the same manner as are
workers employed by STATE's Contractors. COUNTY shall
obtain applicable wage rates from the State Department of
Industrial Relations and shall adhere to the applicable
provision!; of the State Labor Code. Violations shall be
reported to the State Departmerit of Industrial Relations.
(2)To apply for necessary Encroachment Permits for required
work within State highway rights of way, in accordance with
STATE's standard permit procedures, as more specifically
defined in Articles (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of Section
IV, of this Agreement.
(3)To require@ that the construction contractor furnish both a
payment and performance bond in COUNTY name, with both bonds
complying with the requirements set forth in Section 3-1.02
of STATE's current Standard Specifications.
(4)To construct PROJECT in accordance with plans and
specifications of COUNTY to the satisfaction of and subject
to the approval of STATE.
2
District Agreement No. 8-932
(5)Contract Administration procedures shall conform to the
requirements set forth in STATE's Construction Manual, Local
Programs Manual and the Encroachment Permit for construction
of PROJECT.
(6)Construction within the existing or ultimate STATE right of
way shall comply with the requirements in STATE's Standard
specifications and PROJECT Special Provisions, and in
conformance with methods and practices specified in STATE's
Construction Manual.
(7)If COUNTY uses own staff to perform surveys, such surveys
shall conform to the methods, procedures, and requirements
of STATE's Surveys Manual, and STATE's Staking Information
Booklet dated April 1, 1992.
(8)Material testing and quality control shall conform to the
State Construction Manual and the State Material Testing
Manual, and be performed, at COUNTY expense, by a certified
material tester acceptable to STATE. Independent assurance
testing, specialty testing, and off-site source inspection
and testing shall be performed by STATE, at no cost to
COUNTY except as noted herein. COUNTY shall reimburse STATE
for any additional travel expens(@-r. incurred by STATE for
off-site inspection and testing performed by STATE which is
more than 300 airline miles from both Sacramento and Los
Angeles. Approval of the type of asphalt and concrete
plants shall be by STATE, at STATE expense.
(9)To furnish, at COUNTY expense and subject to approval of
STATE, a field site representative who is a licensed Civil
Engineer in the State of California, to perform the
functions of a Resident Engineer. If the PROJECT plans and
specifications were prepared by a private engineering
company, the Resident Engineer shall not be an employee of
that company. The Resident Engineer shall also be
independent of the construction contractor.
(10)Subject to Article (1) of Section III of this Agreement, to
pay one hundred percent (100%) of the actual costs of
construction required for satisfactory completion of
PROJECT, including changes pursuant to contract change
orders concurred with by the STATE representative and any
"State-furnished material".
(11)At COUNTY expense, to furnish qualified support staff,
subject to approval of STATE, to assist the Resident
Engineer in, but not limited to, construction surveys, soils
and foundation tests, measurement and computation of
quantities, testing of construction materials, checking shop
3
District Agreement No. 8-932
drawings, preparation of estimates and reports, preparation
of As-Built drawings, and other inspection and staff
services necessary to assure that the construction is being
performed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Said qualified support staff shall be independent of the
design engineering company and construction contractor,
except that the PROJECT designer may check the shop
drawings, do soils foundation tests, test construction
materials, and do construction surveys.
(12)To make progress payments to the contractor using COUNTY and
CITY funds and pay all costs for required staff services as
described in Articles (9) and (11) of this Section I. The
STATE representative shall review all contract progress pay
schedules. STATE does not assume responsibility for
accuracy of itemization on progress pay schedules.
(13)Within sixty (60) days following the completion and
acceptance of the PROJECT construction contract, to furnish
STATE a complete set of acceptable full-sized film positive
reproducible As-Built plans and all contract records,
including survey documents and microfilm copy of all
structure plans.
(14)Upon completion of work under this Agreement, COUNTY will
assume maintenance and the expense thereof for any part of
PROJECT located outside of current STATE right of way until
acceptance of any such part of PROJECT into the State
highway system by STATE, approval by the Federal Highway
Administrat-'-zn, if required, and conveyance of acceptable
title to STATE.
(15)If COUNTY terminates PROJECT prior to completion of the
construction contract for PROJECT, STATE may require COUNTY,
at COUNTY's expense, to return right of way to its original
condition or to a condition of acceptable permanent
operation. If COUNTY fails to do so, STATE reserves the
right to finish PROJECT or place PROJECT in satisfactory
permanent operation condition. STATE will bill COUNTY for
all actual expenses incurred and COUNTY agrees to pay said
expenses within thirty (30) days or STATE, acting through
the State Controller, may withhold an equal amount from
future apportionments due COUNTY from the Highway User Tax
Fund.
(16)Should any archaeological resources be encountered within
the PROJECT vicinity during construction, COUNTY shall
notify the STATE representative immediately. COUNTY shall
be responsible for the retainment of a qualified
4
District Agreement No. 8-932
archaeologist who shall evaluate the archaeological site and
make recommendations to the STATE representative regarding
the continuance of PROJECT construction.
SECTION II
STATE AGREES:
(1)To issue, at no cost to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor, upon
proper application by COUNTY and by COUNTY's contractor, the
necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within
State highway right of way, as more specifically defined in
Articles (2), (3), (4) and (5) of Section IV, of this
Agreement.
(2)To provide, at no cost to COUNTY, a qualified STATE
representative who shall have authority to accept or reject
work and materials or to order any actions needed for public
safety or the preservation of property and to assure
compliance with all provisions of the Encroachment Permit(s)
issued to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor.
(3)To provide, at COUNTY expense, any "State-furnished
material" as shown on the plans for PROJECT and as provided
in the Special Provisions for PROJECT.
(4)To operate and maintain at State expense, exclusive of
electrical energy costs, traffic control signals and safety
lighting.
SECTION III
CITY AGREES:
(1)To deposit with COUNTY, ten (10) calendar days prior to the
award of the construction contract for PROJECT, all funds
necessary to pay for the construction costs of widening the
on and off ramps on the westerly side of the south junction
of I-15 and Route 79 and to pay for the installation of all
traffic control signals and safety lighting required for
both the westerly and easterly on and off ramps at the south
junction of I-15 and Route 79.
5
District Agreement No. 8-932
(2)To pay 100% of the electrical energy costs of Traffic
control signals and safety lighting.
(3)To issue, at no cost to COUNTY and COUNTY's contractor, upon
proper application by COUNTY and by COUNTY's contractor, the
necessary Encroachment Permits for required work within CITY
right of way.
SECTION IV
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
(1)All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement
are subject to the appropriation of resources by the
Legislature and the allocation of resources by the
California Transportation commission.
(2)Construction by COUNTY of improvements referred to herein
which lie within STATE highway rights of way or affect STATE
facilities, shall not be commenced until COUNTY's original
contract plans involving such work and plan for utility
relocations have been reviewed and accepted by signature of
STATE's District Director of Transportation, or the District
Director's delegated agent, and until an Encroachment Permit
to COUNTY authorizing such work has been issued by STATE.
(3)COUNTY shall obtain aforesaid Encroachment Permit through
the office of State District Permit Engineer and COUNTY's
application shall be accompanied by five (5) sets of reduced
construction plans of aforesaid STATE approved contract
plans. Receipt by COUNTY of the approved Encroachment
Permit shall constitute COUNTY's authorization from STATE to
proceed with work to be performed by COUNTY or COUNTY's
representatives within proposed STATE rights of way or which
affects STATE facilities, pursuant to work covered by this
Agreement. COUNTY's authorization to proceed with said work
shall be contingent upon COUNTY's compliance with all
provisions set forth in this Agreement and said Encroachment
Permit.
(4)COUNTY's construction contractor shall also be required to
obtain an Encroachment Permit from STATE prior to commencing
any work within STATE rights of way or which affects STATE
facilities. The application by COUNTY's contractor for said
Encroachment Permit shall be made through the office of
6
District Agreement No. 8-932
State District Permit Engineer and shall include proof said
contractor has payment and performance surety bonds covering
construction of PROJECT.
(5)COUNTY shall provide a right of way certification prior to
the granting of said Encroachment Permit by STATE, to
certify that legal and physical control of rights of way
were acquired in accordance with applicable State and
Federal laws and regulations.
(6)COUNTY shall not advertise for bids to construct PROJECT
until after an Encroachment Permit has been issued to COUNTY
by STATE.
COUNTY shall not construct any portion of PROJECT within the
proposed STATE right of way until after an Encroachment
Permit has been issued to COUNTY by STATE.
(7)COUNTY's construction contractor shall maintain in force,
until completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction
contract, a policy of Contractual Liability Insurance,
including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability in accordance with Section 7-1.12 of State
Standard Srecifications. Such policy shall contain an
additional insured endorsement naming STATE and CITY,
officers, agents and employees as additional insureds.
Their coverage shall be evidenced by a Certificate of
Insurance in a form satisfactory to STATE and CITY which
shall be delivered to STATE and CITY before the issuance of
an Encroachment Permit to COUNTY contractor.
(8)Prior to award of the construction contract for PROJECT,
COUNTY may terminate this Agreement by written notice.
(9)In construction of said PROJECT, representatives of COUNTY,
STATE and CITY will cooperate and consult, and all work
pursuant to PROJECT shall be accomplished according to
approved plans, specifications and applicable STATE and CITY
standards. Satisfaction of these requirements shall be
verified by the STATE representative. STATE and COUNTY
representatives are authorized to enter CITY's property
during construction for the purpose of monitoring and
coordinating construction activities.
(10)Changes to PROJECT plans and specifications shall be
implemented by contract change orders reviewed and concurred
with by the STATE representative. All changes affecting
public safety or public convenience, all design and
specification changes, and all major changes as defined in
STATE's Construction Manual shall be approved by STATE in
7
District Agreement No. 8-932
advance of performing the work. Unless otherwise directed
by the STATE representative, changes authorized as provided
herein will not require an Encroachment Permit rider. All
changes shall be shown on the As-Built plans referred to in
Section I, Article (13) of this Agreement.
(11)COUNTY shall provide a claims process acceptable to STATE
and shall process any and all claims through COUNTY's claim
process. The STATE representative will be made available to
COUNTY to provide advice and technical input in any claim
process.
(12)If any existing public and/or private utility facilities
conflict with PROJECT construction or violate STATE's
encroachment policy, COUNTY shall make all necessary
arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their
protection, relocation or removal in accordance with STATE
policy and procedure for those facilities located within the
limits of work providing for the improvement of the State
highway and in accordance with CITY policy for those
facilities located outside of the limits of work for the
State highway. Total costs of such protection, relocation
or removal shall be determined in accordance with STATE
policy and procedure. COUNTY shall require any utility
owner and/or its contractors performing relocation work in
STATE's right of way to obtain a STATE Encroachment Permit
prior to the performance of said relocation work. Any
relocated or new facilities shall be correctly shown and
identified on the As-Built plans referred to in Section I,
Article (13), of this Agreement.
(13)If any unforeseen potential hazardous waste sites are
encountered during construction of PROJECT, STATE, COUNTY
and CITY shall meet and confer on a course of action. The
responsibilities and costs for any action shall be covered
by amendment to this Agreement.
(14)Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the
Vehicle Code, STATE has determined that within such areas as
are within the limits of PROJECT and are open to public
traffic, COUNTY shall comply with all of the requirements
set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the Vehicle
Code. COUNTY shall take all necessary precautions for safe
operation of COUNTY's vehicles, the construction
contractor's equipment and vehicles and/or vehicles of
personnel retained by COUNTY and for the protection of the
traveling public from injury and damage from such vehicles
or equipment.
8
District Agreement No. 8-932
(15)Upon completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction
contract by COUNTY to the satisfaction of the STATE
representative and subsequent to the execution of a
maintenance agreement, STATE will accept control and
maintain, at its own cost and expense, those portions of
PROJECT lying within STATE's right of way, except local
roads delegated to CITY for maintenance.
(16)CITY will accept control and maintain, at its own cost and
expense, the portions of PROJECT lying outside STATE's
right of way. Also, CITY will maintain, at CITY expense,
local roads within STATE'S right of way delegated to CITY
for maintenance, as well as all traffic service facilities
that may be required for the benefit or control of CITY
local road traffic.
(17)STATE will maintain the traffic control signal system and
safety lighting as installed at STATE's expense. CITY shall
provide the electrical energy at CITY's expense.
(18)STATE will operate the traffic control signals and safety
lighting as installed at STATE's expense.
(19)Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership
and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances
installed within STATE's right of way will automatically be
vested in STATE, and materials, equipment and appurtenances
installed outside of STATE's right of way will automatically
be vested in CITY. No further agreement will be necessary
to transfer ownership as hereinabove stated.
(20)Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to
create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties
not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability
of any party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of
care with respect to the maintenance of State highways
different from the standard of care imposed by law.
(21)Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason
of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY or CITY
under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY or CITY under this
Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY or CITY shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California,
all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions
of every name, kind and description brought for or on
account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section
810.8)occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be
9
District Agreement No. 8-932
done by COUNTY or CITY under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY or CITY under
this Agreement.
(22)Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee thereof is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason
of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or CITY
under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to STATE or CITY under this
Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, STATE or CITY shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless COUNTY from all claims,
suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought
for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code
Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by STATE or CITY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE
or CITY under this Agreement.
(23)Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason
of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE or COUNTY
under or in connection with any work, authority or
Jurisdiction delegated to STATE or COUNTY under this
.Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, STATE or COUNTY shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims,
suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought
for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code
Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by STATE or COUNTY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE
or COUNTY under this Agreement.
(24)No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement
shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the
parties hereto and no oral understanding or agreement not
incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties
hereto.
10
District Agreement No. 8-932
(25)Those portions of this Agreement pertaining to the
construction of PROJECT shall terminate upon completion and
acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT by
COUNTY with concurrence of STATE, or on November 8, 1999,
whichever is earlier in time; however, the ownership,
operation, maintenance, liability, and claims clauses shall
remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by
mutual agreement.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Transportation
JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation By
Cha@@ 6ard -of
Sup@lsors
By 3EP 2 6 1"5
STAN LISIEWICZ
District Director A
k of@h6 Do"
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: d o @S @ervisors
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attorney, Department of Transportation
By
CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS:
Attest:
City Clerk
District Budget Manager
FORM APPROVED
COUNTY COUNSEL
CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE:
'SEP I A95
District Accounting Administrator
ITEI\4 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIR
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:AuthorizeCostParticipationwithTemeculaValleyUnifiedSchoolDistrict
for the Installation of a Traffic Signal at the intersection of Winchester
and Roripaugh Roads.
PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE participation in the cost of a Traffic Signal Installation
with Temecula Valley Unified School District to be constructed as a portion of the Winchester
Road Widening Project in the amount of two-thirds of the estimated cost to design and
construct the signal.
BACKGROUND:
At their June 18, 1 994, public hearing City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-66 certifying
the Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 94-0002) and Resolution No. 94-67
upholding Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application
No. 93-01 57) for a Transportation Administration and Maintenance Facility for the Temecula
Valley Unified School District located north of Winchester Road and west of the northerly
extension of Roripaugh Road (APN 911-180-024).
One item of concern discussed at the hearing, was the traffic impact at the intersection of
Winchester Road and Roripaugh Road. At the time of approval the representative of Temecula
Valley Unified School District offered to cost participate in the installation of a traffic signal
at this location to mitigate any concerns regarding traffic.
The school district would like to proceed with the installation of the signal and include it's
construction in the bidding of Winchester Road widening. The have requested City of
Temecula cost participation (copy of letter attached) and are willing to fund one-third of the
cost of design and construction. The City would fund the remaining two-thirds.
-I- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\tvusdsig.nal
Staff has reviewed the traffic study for the signal and have determined signal warrants will be
met with the widening of Winchester Road.
Staff has reviewed the school district's request and recommends approval for the following
reasons:
1.The district's cost participation will reduce the City's overall cost for installation of a
signal at this intersection.
2.Overall costs will be reduced by including the signal with the road widening project.
Construction can be coordinated to install the signal now and avoid having to open cut
the roadway to install the signal at a later date.
3.Safer access will be provided to the residents of Roripaugh Hills and the maintenance
facility.
4.The signal will facilitate development of the commercial properties at this intersection
which will in turn will generate the traffic signal fees to pay for most of the signal
installation.
5.Pedestrian access will be improved to the residential areas by installation of the
signal and related crosswalks. This will also facilitate access to future commercial
developments and to recreational facilities along Santa Gertrudis Creek.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Signal mitigation fees will be used to fund the cost participation. The estimated cost at this
time is $104,000. The City's portion will be approximately $69,000. T@'-@e exact amount will
be determined after receipt of bids and completion of construction.
Attachments:
1.Letter of Request from Temecula Valley Unified School District.
2.Location Map
-2- r:%agdrpt%96\0423%tvusdsig.nal
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Barbara Tooker
P,e@ni
TEMECULA VALLEY Richard Shafer
c@
Linda Campbell
Unified School District
Patti Smith
@ r
Rosie Vanderhaak
SUPERINTENDENT
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed-D.
March 28, 1996 -D
RECE!Vrr_
Steven CressweU, Principal Engineer
Public Works Department APR I 1,Qj 9 6
City of Temecula
'Mr A
_ijU; -tl.
43174 Business Park Drive
DE P A,@
Temecula, CA 92590 1 T@ENT
Subject.joint Funifing Request
RotipaughlWtnchester Signal
Dear Steve:
This letter formally requests the City of Temecula to jointly fund a Roripaugh Road/%Vinchester Road 4-way traffic
signal with the Temecula Valley Unified School District.
Following our District's commitment to the City Council in June 1994 to participate in the 4-way traffic signal
project to enhance access to our Maintenance/Operations/Transportation Facility, we have worked to enable the
signal's installation in conjunction with the upcoming County Winchester Road widening project. Our efforts have
resulted in a completed signal design, forwarded to the City Public Works Department January 25, 1996, and now
included in the County's Winchester Road bid package.
In recognition of the safety benefits to our District's operations, and the warranted community need for the signal
even without District traffic (adjacent existing residences, future commercial development), the District proposes
to fund up to one-third of the cost of the signal's design and construction, and requests that the City fund the balance
of these costs.
The total cost of the signal's design and construction is estimated at $104,000, reflecting the cost savings expected
by coordinating the signal work with the larger road project.
As discussed with you and with Joe Kicak Dreviously, we request that the nror)osed ioint funding arrangement be
approved and formalized in time to facilitate the County's construction and payment schedule for the signal during
the Winchester Road project, which goes to bid April 15, 1996.
We look forward to the approval of this cooperative proposal, which very economically addresses a community
safety need in a well- coordinated manner.
Since
Dave Gallaher
Director of Facilities Development
r_c:Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent
John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent
Kelley Donovan, County of Riverside Transportation Dept.
31350 Rancho Vista Road / Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
PROJECT
SITE
,HI 0
VICINITY MAP
LL
I-,VA
PLE
bE L-
PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
WINCHESTER ROAD/RORIPAUGH ROAD
Location Maio
NOTE:i\/L4,PS NOT TO SCALE
ITEIN4 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Release Grading Security for Export of Soils
(Southeast corner at Winchester Road at Margarita Road)
PREPARED BY: teven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
AKC Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Grading Security for export of soils materials
from the Southeast corner of Margarita Road at Winchester Road to several sites along the
northerly side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Nicolas Road, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
The Bedford Development Company sought to grade certain of their holdings in the area
between Winchester Road and Santa Gertrudis Creek from Margarita Road and Nicolas Road.
The area was within Tentative Parcel Map No. 26759, a proposed industrial park which
abutted proposed flood control channel workto be constructed under Assessment District No.
1 61.
The source site was the area owned by Bedford Development Company lying along the
easterly side of proposed Margarita Road southerly of Winchester Road. All environmental
issues were resolved for three borrow sites. Previous exports were approved and
accomplished over two areas (Borrow Sites 2 and 3). The grading plans and grading permits
(TEM 91-026, 027) for Area 3 were approved and the Letter of Credit posted as guarantee
for Area 3 only. The approved plans included erosion control measures and clean-up.
The developer is seeking release of a Instrument of Credit issued by Butterfield Financial
Corporation as performance security for the subject borrow site, in the amount of $1 000,000.
The work was satisfactorily completed in 1 991 with some erosion control restoration in the
winter of 1991-1992. Subsequent to the completion of the subject export of materials, other
permits have been issued for export to the high school site and other locations.
agdrpt\96\0423\tp@213.exp
Staff recommends the release of this document to the surety and notification to the permittee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
agdrpt\96\0423\tpm252l3.exp
LC;T 1 17
RRC
PROJECT
I LL
OMRC3 W
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
VICINI-- M
Borrow Site for Tent. Parcel Map 26759
Location Map
ITEIN4 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Approval of Agreement regarding transfer of Drainage Facilities to
Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. (Ynez
Road northerly of Motor Car Parkway)
PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council APPROVE the attached agreement between Advanced Cardiovascular
Systems ('ACS'), the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
('DISTRICT"), and the City of Temecula ('CITY) for transfer of Drainage Facilities to the
DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the agreement, and DIRECT the City Clerk to
attest thereto and to transmit the document to the DISTRICT for final processing through the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved Plot Plan No. 1 which required the construction of certain drainage
facilities to provide flood protection for ACS' planned development. The Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) inspected the project facilities as
constructed by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems (ACS), and is willing to assume ownership
and responsibility to operate and maintain the drainage system subject to conditions set forth
in the agreement.
ACS obligations under the agreement include construction of the facilities, provision of all
necessary onsite easements, fee simple title to onsite rights-of-way, access rights, and other
commitments, and transfer of the drainage facilities to the DISTRICT,
The CITY's obligations under this agreement include granting the DISTRICT the right to
operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights-of-way, and to accept responsibility for the
operation and maintenance of all PROJECT inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights-of-
way.
The City assumes no new obligations under this agreement as street maintenance
responsibilities normally include maintenance of both inlets and connector pipes.
r:\agd rpt\9 6NO423@ rcf cd acs.tem
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Location Map
Agreement (on file)
r:\agd rpt@9 6\0423\rcf cd acs.tem
Uff7
END RCFC &
EXISnNC'r X.T Wm
WCD PROJECT
EXI NG OSL
EX@NG
@ 16-4.
EXiTnNc oaL r x 4, & oeL r x
Q@ 72@
BEGIN RCFC
WCD PROJE
NOTE: LAPS NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
PLOT PLAN NO. I
RCFC&WCD PROJECT
Location Map
AGREEMENT
211(Plot Plan No. 1)
4 The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WAT-7-R
5CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRIC--", the CITY OF
6
TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY", and ADVANCED C.@RDIOVASCJLAR
SYSTEMS, a California corporation, hereinafter called "T@77VELOPE.Rll,
9hereby agree as follows:
in RECITALS
A.DEVELOPER has received CITY approval for Plot Plan
12No. 1 in the City of Temecula, and as a condition for approval
DEVELOPER was required to construct certain flood control
15facilities in order to provide flood protection for DEVELOPER"
16planned development; and
7
B. The required facilities include approximately 200
lineal feet of rectangular channel, with an underground- reinforced
19
20concrete box, hereinafter altogether called "PROJECT", extending
ù'IL from an existing box at Interstate 1S, upstream to an existing box
22at Ynez Road, as shown in red on Exhibit "Al' attached here to and
23
made a r)art hereof; and
24
C. DEVELOPERdesires DISTRICT to assume ownership and
25
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT; and
26
27 D. DISTRICT reviewed and approved the plans and
28
sdeci . ficatio,-is prepared by DEVELOPER for PROJECT, and insnecce@-
2i
3@ the construction of PROJECT under the authority of a Right of
4@ Entry and Inspection Agreement executed on Novembe-- 27, 1990
l@
51between DISTRICT and DEVELOPER; and
611 E. DEVELOPER has deposited with DISTRICT sum of
S24,000.00, the estimated cost of providing construction
8
inspection for PROJECT; and
9
F. DEVELOPER has paid DISTRICT (Zone 7 Ma4ntenance
Fund), a one time cash sum of $83,300.00 to cover DISTRI,@-TIS
12
estimated costs for operation and maintenance of PROJECT through
i the year 1998; and
15 G. DISTRICT is now willing to assume ownership and
16responsibility for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT,
17excluding inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights of way,
18provided, (i) DEVELOPER complies with this agreement, (ii)
20PROJECT has been constructed in accordance with plans and
21specifications approved by DISTRICT, (iii) DEVELOPER obtains and
221'conveys to DISTRICT all rights of way necessary for the operation
23and maintenance of PROJECT as set forth herein; and
F. CITY is willing (i) to grant DISTRICT the right to
2 Z-)
operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights of way, and (ii)
26
27to accect responsibility for the operation and maintenance of all
2
PROJECT inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights of wa,,-,
2i
provided PROJECT is constructed in accordance with plans and
specifications aoproved by DISTRICT and CITY.
NOW, THER-7FORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as
@-ollows:
gi SECTION I
DEVELOPER shall:
1. Pay DISTRICT, upon execution of this agreement, the
12,
one time cash sum of $2,000.00, the agreed upon amount necessary
13
14to cover DIS@LRICTIS costs incurred in the preparation, processing
15and administration of this agreement.
162. Secure all necessary licenses, agreements, permits
17and rights of entry as may be needed for the operation and
ismaintenance of PROJECT, including, but not limited to, such
20licenses, agreements, permits or rights of entry as may be
21required from CITY and the California State Department of
22Transportation ("Caltrans"). DEVELOPER shall furnish DISTRICT
23
p-ior- to DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT for operation and
2 z'
maintenance with sufficient evidence of DEVELOPER having secured
25
such necessary licenses, agreements, permits and rights of enzry,
26
as determined and approved by DISTRICT.
27
28 3
3 Uoon acceptance of all "on-si-@e" szreet:
2!
O.L way by CITY as deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for the
ooe--aL--ion and maintenance of PROJECT but prior to DISTRICT
411
51! acceptance of PROJECT for operation and maintenance, conv-3,,@ or
6
cause to be conveyed to DISTRICT:
(a) Flood control easement (s) inc7-ud'L incress
and egress, in a form approved bv DISTRICT,
the rights of way as shown in conce@t cross-
hatched in red and in conceidt c--oss-hatched in
2 blue on Exhibit "El' attached hereto and made a
13
part hereof;
15 (b) Fee simple title to the rights of way as shown
16 in concept shown in blue on Exhibit "Bl';
17 (c) Easement(s), for ingress and egress purposes,
in a form approved by DISTRICT for the rights
of way as shown in concept cross-hatched in
20
21green and in concept cross-hatch ed in blue on
22Exhibit "Bl'; and
2
(d)Flood and inundation easements, including
ingress and egress, for the rights of way
2 5determined by DISTRICT to be subjec-- to
7flooding and inundation in a once in one
4
hundred year frequency flood even--, as shown
2
concept cross-hatched in purple on Exhibi@
attached hereto and made a oart hereof, and
with DEVELOPERIS commitment to ma4rta4- "-)e
hydraulic capacity of the easement- b,@ of
7
the corresponding covenants included
easement deed.
94. At the time of recordation of the convevancin- docu-
ment(s) set forth in Section I.3., furnish DISTRICT with policies
of title insurance, each in the amount of not less than twenty-
five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) for each easement parcel to oe
15 con-veyed to DISTRICT, and a policy of title insurance in the
16, amount of not less than fifty thousand ($50,000.00) for each fee
17 parcel to he conveyed to DISTRICT, guaranteeing DISTRICTIS
i
:1 interest in said property as being free and clear of all liens,
20encumbrances, assessments, easements, taxes and leases (recorded
,2iand unrecorded), and except those which, in the sole discretion off
221DISTRICT, are acceptable.
23
5. Assume sole ownership and resdonsib@-litv for the
211,
operation and maintenance of PROJECT, until such time that PROJECT;
25
ownersh 4p is accepted by DISTRICT as set forth in Section -LV.l.
26
11 herein.
271
6.Pay, i4 suit is brought upon this contrac- or an%,
2
bond guaranteeing completion of PROJECT, all costs and reasonable
3
4:expenses and fees, including reasonable a@.tornevs, fees, and
5
acknowledge that, upon entry of judgmen,@-, all such costs, exnenses
6
and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in anv judament--
17
rendered.
9 8. Furnish DISTRICT with final mylar plans for
joi@ and assign their ownership to DISTRICT.
SECTION II
ij
12 li
DISTRICT shall:
1.Upon execution of this agreement, record or cause to
14 II
15be recorded,.a copy of this agreement in the Official Records of
16the Riverside County Recorder.
17 2. Accept ownership and responsibility for the
18
operation and maintenance of PROJECT, excluding the two-existing
,0
boxes located in Caltrans and CITY rights of way, at Interstate 15
201
1 and Ynez Road respectively, and excluding all PROJECT inlets and
21
4' 2 connector pipes within CITY street rights of way, upon (i)
23
DISTRICT acceptance of the construction of PROJECT as being
,2
complete, (ii) recordation of the conveyancing documents described'
25
in Section I.3., and (iii) acceptance of all necessary street
2 5
17rights of way by CITY as deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for,
6
the operation and maintenance of PROJECT.
2
3. Keep an accurate accountingof all DISTRICT
construction inspection costs, and within (45) davs
4'
5
at-r-er DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT as being comoler-e, su!Dm-'-t a
6
cost statement: to DEVELOPER. If inspection costs ha-@,-e e.@-eede@-
the decosi@ as set forth herein, DEVELOPER shall aa-@ the
9additional amount as may be deemed necessary by DISTRT@- to co-1;,ei-
its inspection costs, upon demand by DISTRICT. If -.he deidcsj-
exceeds said inspection costs, DISTRICT shall reimburse DEVELOPER I
12
the excess amount within sixty (60) days after DISTRICT acceptance
of PROJECT as being complete.
74
4.Provide CITY with duplicate "as-built" mylar plar
15
16for all PROJECT facilities constructed within CITY rights of way,
17upon DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT as being complete,
SECTION III
201@ CITY shall:
21 1. Grant DISTRICT, by execution of this agreement, the
22right to operate and maintain PROJECT within CITY rights of way as,
23
set forth herein.
24
2.Accept ownership and responsibility for the
25 !I I
operation and maintenance of all PROJECT i-niets and connector
26
27pipes within CITY rights of way, upon DISTRICT acceptance o-@
28 7
PROJECT as being complete.
2SECTION TV
4@iIt is further mutually agreed:
51. All work involved with PROJECT was inspected 1),,-
6;
DISTRICT but shall not be deemed complete until aoz)roved and
accepted as comolete by DISTRICT.
2.DEVELOPER and DISTRICT, knowingly and
9
10,waive the provisions of Government Code Section 65913.8, relat@-na
to fees and charges. Such waiver is accomplished with the
-12understanding that DISTRICT is voluntarily undertaking the
'L4obligation to accept ownership and responsibility -'or the
operation and maintenance of PROJECT, and DEVELOPER is not
15
16required by DISTRICT to enter into this agreement.
17 3. DEVELOPER shall, until DISTRICT accepts PROJECT for-
18@
1 operation and maintenance:
19
20 (a) Provide and maintain comprehensive liability
21 insurance coverage which shall protect
22
DEVELOPER from claim from damages for personal
23
1 in3ury, including accidental and wrongful
death, as well as from claims for property
25
damage which may arise from DEVELOPERIS
26
27 construction of PROJECT or the performance of
its obl-gations hereunder, whether such
construction or performance be by DEVELOPER
any ccnt--acl@or, subcon-.rac--cr, or bv anyone
11 employed directly or indirectly bv a-.v ol@
6
Such insurance shall name DISTRICT and as
7
additional insureds with res-aec- to -h4s
agreement and the obligations of D-@V7-LOPE,@
hereunder. Such insurance shall provide @-C--
limits of not less than two million dollars
-12 ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence.
(b) Cause its insurance carrier(s) to furnish
L
151 DISTRICT and CITY, upon request, with
16 certificates of insurance showing that such
17insurance is in full force and effect and that
isDISTRICT and CITY are named as additional
20insureds with respect to this agreement and the
obligations of DEVELOPER hereunder. Further,
21
22said certificates shall provide that the
2issuing company shall aive DISTRICT and CITY
2sixty (60) days written notice in the event of
2:;any cancellation, termination, non-renewal or
26reduction in coverage c-L- the policies evidenced
27
9
2by the certificates. in the even-. of an,,,
such cancellation, te--minaticn, ncn---enewal cr
4@ireduction in coveraue, DEVELOPER shall,
forthwith, secure replacement insurance mee--i-.-,@
6;the provision of this paractrach.
Failure to maintain the insurance b@z zi--'-s
9paragraph shall be deemed a material breach of this agreement.
4.In the event that any claim or legal action is
brought against DISTRICT or CITY in connection with this agreement'
2because of the actual or alleged acts or omissions by DEVELOPER,
DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT and CITY
15harmless therefrom, without cost to DISTRICT or CITY. Upon
16@DEVELOPERIS failure to do so, DISTRICT and CITY shall be entitled
7to recover from DEVELOPER all of their cost and expenses,
isincluding, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys, fees.
205. DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT
21and CITY, their respective officers, agents, employees and
22iindependent contractors free and harmless from any claim
23whatsoever, based or asserted, pu--suant to Article I, Section 19
of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United
5States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to
impose anv other liability or damage whatsoever, for the design,
10
cons ruc@ion or Iaiiure of PROJECT or from the diversion o;' -he
2!
waters from the natural drainage patterns, save and except cIL@.
4and litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole wi_ 1 1 -FU,
5 mi. sconduc,,- of DISTRICT or CITY. DEVELOPER shall- E-LSTRICT
and CITY without cost to DISTRICT or CITY, and uaon E)E'@LOP7-.@'S
'7
failure to do so, DISTRICT and CITY shall be entitled to recover
8
9from DEVE 7 OP7R all of their cost and expenditures, includ@-nal but
-0 not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees.
6.DEVELOPER for itself, its successors and assigns
1-2
hereby releases DISTRICT and CITY, their respective
l@ agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions,
15 or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, including,
i
16 not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted,
171 pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution
1and the F4-fth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any
20other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability
or damage, whatsoever, for the design, construction or failure oz
2
22PROJECT, or the discharge of drainage within or from PROJECT.
23
Nothi-ng contained herein shall constitute a release bv IDEVE7.OPER
07DISTRICT or CITY, their officers, agents and emidlovees from any;
2
and a!'- claims, demands, actions or suits of anv kind arisi-na out
for the negligent maintenance o-@ PROJECT, after
an@,,,
27 (D
;i the acceptance of PROJECT by DISTRICT.
21
7.Any waiver bv DISTRICT or by CITY of any breach of
4any one or more of the terms of this agreement s.,-all not ]De
construed to be a waiver c@' any subsecruenl-- or other breach 0- the
6
same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the card of DIS-_@7CT!
7
or CITY to require exact, full and comz)lete compliance w@-t'@ an-,,
9terms of this agreement shall not be construed as in anv manner
changing the terms hereof, or estopp@na DISTRICT or CITY _F_-om
enforcement hereof.
2
8. If any provision in this agreement (with the
exception of Section IV.2.) is held by a court of competent
4
15jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining
16provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being
17impaired or invalidated in any way. Should it be held by a court
18
of competent jurisdiction that any portion of Section IV.3. is
19
20invalid, void or unenforceable, the provisions of Government Code
2165913.8(b) shall apply. It shall, therefore, be determined that
22this fee is extended through the year 1998.
2
9. This agreement is to be construed in accordance w4-thi@@
ID 4
tfte iaws of the SI--ate of California.
2:)
10.Any and all notices sent o- required to ]De sen- zo
26
2, the idart-;es of this agreement will be mailed by ---sr- class mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses:
2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEMEI--ULA
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43174 Business Park Drive
4 Post Office Box 1033 Temecula, CA 9z@-390
Riverside, CA 92502-1033
5
ADVANCED CARDIOVASCU,@ SYSTEMS
26531 Ynez Road
Temecula, CA 92390
12.Any action at law or in equity brought @v anv of --he@
9
parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a rictht or rigntis
11 provided for by the agreement shall be tried in a court of
1
competent jurisdiction in the County of-Riverside, State of
12 1
California, and the zarties hereto waive all provisions oL law
providing for change of venue in such proceedings to any other
15
i county.
16 13. This agreement is the result of the negotiations
17
78between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their
19respective counsel. @he fact that this agreement was prepared as
20a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or
21significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement
22@shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT Dre@ared
23@
2@this agreement in its final. form.
25!14. The rights and obligations of DEVELOPER shall inure
--o and be binding uuon all heirs, successors and assianees.
27i
@-3
11 not assign or otherwise tran
15.DEVELOPER sha szer a-.,,,
2of their rights, duties or obligations hereunder to any person or
4entity without the written consent of the other mar-@4---s hereto
5 i being first obtained. In the event of any such trans--cer or
6
assignment, DEVELOPER expressly understands and act-ees --at t:hev
7 @l
shall remain liable with respect to any and all of --.@-e
and duties contained in this agreement.
9
13 16. This agreement is intended by the part-'-es hereto as
11 a final expression of their understanding with reszect to the
12
subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement C.Ll 4:
73
It--he terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all @rior
14 11
and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written
in connection therewith. This agreement may be changed or
modified only udon the written consent of the parties hereto.
15
19
20
21
22
2
.2 5
2,3
27
22-
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of C\-
County of
On l@ before me,
3A7E
personally appeared
personally known to me - OR
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi
to be the erson@. whose name".---s re
p a
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to
the same i
she/thev executed
/herl'their authorized
capacity"@), and that b his her,itheill
signature'K on the instrument the person(,,t
or the entity upon behalf of which the
personl@ acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
LEE ANN DOLPH
z
IC3.3597 z
otary @lic - California
COUNTY SIGNATURE OF
Car- @re3 JUL 3 1. IQ
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattanment of this iorm.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
TITL@ OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
TITL-=(S)
PARTNER(S) F7 LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NU@IBER OF PAGES
i-RUST@@(SI)
GUARDIANI,'CONSE:;VATOR
OT@EP-
DATE OF DOCUMEN7
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
SIGNIER(IS', OTHER TH,4i\J NArviED ABOVE
-@1993 NATIONAL,\107AR'-' -kSSCCIATIO.14 - 8236 Remmet @.,Ye., P C 2cx 71 8-1 - Can,-ga Park, CA @l -I-)@-71 @-I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have e.-cec,,---
2il this agreement on
(to be filled in by Clerk of the Board)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5
Ev
DAVID P. ZAPPE Chairman, Board of Sur)erv4-sors
Interim General Manager-Chief Engineer
7
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN GERALD A. MALONEV-
County Counsel Clerk c@L the Board
v By
Deputy., Deputy
'2
Dated 2. (SEAL)
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF TEMECULA
15
DV
City Engineer City Manager
16 t
17 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
18 By City Attorney By City Clerk
19
20 ]Dated (SEAL)
21
ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR
SYSTEMS, a California
22@
c orpor@on
23
BY.
2
TitieZ
25
26 B y
271
Title
SC--:mc-@:slj (NOTARY)
15
VICINRTY MAP
Uff -7 4
END RCFC
EXMNNC 7 X WCO PROJECT
2=
la, x 51 Ka
C(ISTINC OSL a,
Q@ 72@
E3EGI
WCO PROJECT
C13 ui
LOCATION MAP *! 9 .>
LAIizcn=
EXHIBIT A
-1 Z-D -1 z@ -3
Ad.S. 119136-J9 RIV. CO.
L-252.79
T-127.11
i.00 ACRES
4J,478 SO. FT.
SEE DETAIL "A
POIIVT OF BEGINNING
N 47'16'51 13.50- w
DETAIL
S@: I" - 50'
0-09'17'02"
R-IOJO.00'
L-166.90'
T-4i.6i,
Ch"Na
-i -D -1 1-@
A4.8.lt9l36-J9 RIV. CO.
651' W
8.50'
PRD2ARED UNDER 7NE'
SUP OF-
w
Ms
-ok
a47F I/ i
EXHIBIT B
I Of 6
115/34
are
2 2. 2 7'
EXHIBIT B
2 of 6
CHANNEL
A4.B. ii9l36-39 RIV CO.
S 4 7'1651" E
ii.00,
N 42-4J'C:-
8.50,
6@
47"16'51" C' 0.20 ACRES
8,616 SQUVW FEE7
A4.B. 119IJ6-J9 RIV. CO.
No
EXHIBIT B
3 of 6
C3
7ri@
sip - 7,9
,JOHAI T. 951,VH417,
#7
EXHIBIT B
4 of 6
/iV4T NO. 7 0 7 8 8 '?O- 9,3
EXHIBIT B
5 of 6
r c r
,EASEM,CAlr
EXHIBIT B
6 of 6
'01'45'6
K.O. 59'
5.11'04'ZI'XI - I
/0 2'.i'
07' rr,
3 04'
Al.45-57-40-5 7'0 7'W
49'Z5VI"
'26'06
19 58'-
50'
,V 4(.
-39
5,43,za.,34
A/
35.4t3
7/. 1 Z'
W43'
6
7 -
756
IAI T R,5 7-,4 7-@ 15
EXHIBIT C
I 4n f O>
4 w
-F@ C
4?. 80'
6,05,56 - W.
55.19'
6'7 @-3 C
41.64'
S,?9,5c"15
51. 7'
5 Z,?'19'13
4'*;41
'31'20"w
ed
EXHIBIT C
2 of 2
ITEI\4 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT(D@F
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Parcel Map No. 27987-1 (located south of Highway 79 South, between
Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen Way - Vail Ranch Commercial Ctr.)
PREPARED BY: teven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE Parcel Map No. 27987-1 subject to the Conditions of
Approval, and the Developer providing proof of payment of property taxes and any special
assessments prior to release of the map for recordation.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27987 (PA95-0097)was approved by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission on March 6, 1995. A revised phasing map was subsequently approved by the
Planning Director on July 26, 1995. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions
of Approval.
Parcel Map No. 27987-1 contains 1 1 commercial parcels within 21.26 gross acres. The
parcel map is located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway and Country
Glen Way. This map is part of the Vail Ranch Commercial Center as approved by the City of
Temecula Planning Commission. The Developers are LandGrant and Old Vail Partners.
Condition No. 23 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27987 states that any delinquent property taxes
shall be paid prior to recordation of the map. As stated in the attached letter, the Developer,
LandGrant, is requesting that the City Council approve the final map at this time in order to
facilitate funding of the project. Property taxes and any special assessments will be paid after
receipt of funding but prior to release of the map for recordation.
The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map 27987-1:
Stephen's K-Rat Fee Due prior to 1 st Grading Permit
Public Facilities Fee Due prior to Building Permit
Signal Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit
Fire Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit
r:\agd rpt\9 6\0423\pm27987 1 map
The following bonds have been posted for Parcel Map No. 27987-1:
Faithful Labor & Subdivision
Performance Material Monum@n
Street and Drainage $220,500 $110,250
Water $304,500 $152,250
Sewer $111,000 $ 55,500
$636,000 $318,000
Survey Monuments $8,000
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Development Fee Checklist
2.Vicinity Map
3.Copy of Sheet 2, Parcel Map 27987-1
4.Fees and Securities Report
5. Letter from LandGrant dated April 10, 1996 regarding payment of property taxes
-2- r:\agdrpt\9 6\0423\pm27 987 1 map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Parcel Mai) 27987-1
The following fees and deposits were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee Condition of Approval
Habitat Conservation Plan Condition No. 33 (Plot Plan)
(K-Rat) Due Prior to 1 st Grading Permit
Parks and Recreation n/a
(Quimby Fees)
Traffic Signal Mitigation Condition No. 37
Due Prior to Building Permit
Public Facility Condition No. 72
Due Prior to Building Permit
Fire Protection Mitigation Condition No. 122 (Plot Plan)
Letter dated 1-5-95
Flood Control (ADP) n/a
Letter dated 1 1-1 0-94
-3- r:\agdrptk96kO423\pm27987 l.map
RC
p p(-) I C'@ I-
ùI
SITE
'7@
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
EA
V)
cn r
u t!
(L
-C
9z
LI
E/)
LM
Rs
U CO
co
z
z
r
WAY
C, MAp tio, 2005
coumm Mg 236125-27
TRACR AIAP NO. . of
I 04B 246133-3
'K
IE
ai
cc zi
it
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP 27987-1 DATE: April 23, 1996
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 220,500 $ 110,250
Water 305,500 152,250
Sewer 111,000 55,500
TOTAL s 636,0001 $ 318,000
Maintenance Retention $ 63,600
Monument Security $ 8,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES (PA95-0097)
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs $ N/A
RCFCD Drainage Fee - n/a $ N/A
Fire Mitigation Fee - deferred $ T.B.D.*
Signal Mitigation Fee - deferred $ T.B.D.*
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee $ N/A
Other Development Fees $ T.B.D*
SERVICE FEES (LD95-003MP)
Planning Fee $69.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $4.00
Plan Check Fee $1,050.00
Inspection Fee $ N/A
Monument Inspection Fee $400.00
Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review) $ N/A
Fees Paid to Date $1,523.00
Balance of Fees Due $0.00
IT.B.D. - To be determirwd
-4- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pm279871.rnap
lwednesday Apri I 10, 1996 10:02m -- from 16191 -- Page 1 1
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7021 ; 4-10-9B ;12:16PM 619-+ 909 694 6475;# 1
R l@E
APR
LANDGITANT
l@ sidtc 212
gal3o
T (619) 481@
T (619) 491-3106
sent Via Facsimile
April 10, 1996
Mr. iimk Paul
Engineering Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Re:Project-. Vail-Ranch Center
item: Final Map Approval
bear Jim,
This letter will confirm that the City of Temecula has agreed
to allow our final parcel map to proceed to City Council on April
23, 1996 for final approval on the condition that we will pay off
the past due assessments and real estate taxes prior to the
recordation of the map. ' Attached is a memo from the County of
Riverside estimating the past due assessments th2Lt will be paid
prior to the recordation of the map in may, 1996.
I understand this is not standard operating procedure for the
City. We appreciate the City working with us to expedite our
shopping center development which will benefit the Southern
Temecula residents. our construction lender did not want to fund
the loan until the.final map was ready to record. The source of
paying off the back taxes will be the construction loan.
Jim, if you have any quBBtions, please give me a call.
sincerely,
Chris Smith,
Executive Vice President
Attachment
cc:C. Samuel Marasco
Chip Swanson
/koh
RLF- VAILAC: WW. CrrY OF TEMECULA
N.@VAILAC,JFAULCSS
lwednesday Aprit 10, 1996 10:02wn -- From 16191 -- Page 21
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7021 ; 4-10-96 ;12:16PM 61 909 694 6475;# 2
FA)(
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
OFFICE
FOR IMMEDIATE DELIVERY
DATE: March 29, 1990 4:53 pm Totiki On '&:
go
(inowing Cmw
TO:Chris Smtth
Land0rant Developmiont
T&WOZ.- (610)481-3108
FROM:Suzette @rnons (909)275-1112
CEO
Per our discussion on March 28, 1996, the following Is the total special taxes due by
May 30, 19N:
Aj"ssment District 159 Vail Rench LTD(Formally Old VoU @eral
APN- 950-110-014-7
92/93 Judgermnt $167,326.50
93-96 Delinquency $483,930-09
Sheriff Advance 800.00
Post Judgernant Attorney Cost 94,40.00
Tntsi Dun bx Mmy 30, 1995
Make chick payable to: First Trust California
Send check to-. Albort A. Webb & Anoc@
P.O. Box 723
Rivwside, CA 92602
ITEIN4 20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIR
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Acceptance of Drainage Easement in portion of Tract 22916-3 and
Quitclaim to Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation
District. (Northwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield
Stage Road)
PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF
EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF
DRAINAGE FACILITIES MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AND AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT. (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63
IN TRACT NO. 22916-3)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council of the City Temecula approved Tract Map No. 2291 6-3 on September 20,
1 990. An offer for a drainage easement was not accepted at the time of the map approval.
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) has requested
that the City of Temecula now accept the offer for the drainage easement and authorize
Quitclaim of any and all rights to easement acquired by the City of Temecula to the DISTRICT.
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63
The DISTRICT will then maintain the storm drain systems which were approved and
inspected by the DISTRICT in accordance with Developer-DISTRICT-City
agreement executed November 27, 1990.
The subject locations are included with this Staff Report. The legal description is on
attachments (Exhibits 'A' and "Bm) to City Council Resolution No. 96-
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits 'A-B', inclusive.
Quitclaim Form (DISTRICT) (on file)
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TENMCULA, CALIEFORNIA, ACC G AN OFFER OF
E,KSEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF
DRAINAGE FACIL MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMEECULA,
AND ALTTHORIZING QLTITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO
THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT. (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63
IN TRACT NO. 22916-3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
@REAS, The City Council did not accept an offer of dedication of a drainage easement for
the construction and maintenance of drainage facilities on Tract Map No. 22916-3; and,
RFAS, The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has requested
that the City of Temecula accept the said offer of dedication as set forth above, and to authorize the
quitclaim of said offer to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts the offer of dedication and authorizes the quitclaim of said easement to the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, JuneS. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
96-was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meetingthereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63
EXMIT "A" TO RESOLLMON NO. 95-
Accepting Easement for construction and maintenance of drainage
facilities as shown on L4ot No. 62 and 63 of Tract NUp No 22916-3,
Filed in Book 225 of Maps, Pgs 57-64 Ind, as Recorded September
31, 1990.
r:Nagdrpt\96\0423\rcfdes9.1 63
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
'F' ZAMOIZA
"G'
IARIZir.
ZIP
-3
TRACT NO.
IA.
Ioo
"MT "M F*OST I A-S=l@TES
PA UB A 11.2 42 41@ 4 lee
55
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCNON
AND M NANCE OF DRAINAGE
FACILITIES TO BE ACCEPTED BY
7'517'E CITY OF CULA AND THEN @111111-14
QUrrCLAD,IED TO THE
VICINFY MAP RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
A@ND W.-KTER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
ITEIN4 21
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE D
CITY MAN@
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Amendment to Staff Report: Award of Contract for the Construction of
a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Margarita Road and State Route 79
(South), Project No. PW95-15
PREPARED BY:Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council appropriate $45,000 in Signal Mitigation Funds from the Development
Impact Fund to the Capital Improvement Project Fund.
BACKGROUND:
On March 12, 1996, City Council approved the award of contract for the construction of the
Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and SR 79(S). This project includes
installation of a four (4) way fully actuated traffic signal, minor roadway modifications, and
signing and striping.
The agenda report dated March 12, 1996, is being amended to appropriate the additional funds
required for this project. The appropriation of $45,000 covers the construction contract of
$141,676.50 plus ten percent (10%) contingency in the amount of $14,167.55, for a total
amount of $155,844.1 5. This represents the total cost and contingencies. Per the cooperative
agreement with Riverside County, 25% of the above costs will be reimbursed by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is funded by Signal Mitigation Funds for the Development Impact Fund, and
appropriated in Account No. 210-165-645-5804. There is currently $111,516.00 in the
account which was appropriated through Fiscal Year 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program.
Attachment:
Contract
r. \agdrpt\96\04 23\pw95-1 5. amd/AJP
ITEI\4 22
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
DI' R OF FIN4
CITYMANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Support of AB 3382
RECOMMENDATION:
1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING AB-
= WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL
SALES AT ONE LOCATION.
BACKGROUND:The California Constitution vests the exclusive right and authority to
license and regulatethe manufacture, sale, purchase, possession, and transportation of
alcoholic beverages inthe state. Existing law prohibit local ordinance restricting concurrent
sales of alcohol and fuel, if the jurisdiction allows the retailing of gas and alcohol in separate
sites. Only those that cities have valid conditional use permits (CUP) regulating concurrent
sales of alcohol and gas prior to the passage of the 1986 law are allowed to regulate those
establishments. AB 3382 would repeal the prohibition, thereby allowing cities to adopt
conditional use permits regulating the concurrent sale of motor fuel and alcohol for off-premise
consumption.
AB 3382 would allow the City of Temecula to regain local control over concurrent sales. In
the face of increasing awareness of the problems associated with drunk driving, shouldn't local
community leaders be able to decide if concurrent sales makes sense for a particular location?
The City of Temecula says "Yes," and supports AB 3382.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this action.
R:@IER-DN,REPORT,STAFF3 I.MIS
RESOLUTTON NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF CULA
SUPPORTING AIR 3382 WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF
CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION.
TIRE C= COUNCEL OF THE CRIY OF ULA DOES RESOLVE, DE I AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
AS, existing laws prohibit local ordinance restricting sales of fuel and alcohol;
and,
WHEREAS, there seems to be an inherent inconsistency codified in state law that allows
the motoring public to buy cold alcoholic beverages and then drive away; and,
WHEREAS, AR 3392 will give the City of Temecula the ability to regulate concurrent
sales.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
Section 1:The City Council does support AR 3392.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the nairnes of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:@IERDA\P,EPOR@AFF31.Mis
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of _, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
A@T:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF I]DE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO Y CERTIIFY that
Resolution No. 96- - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the -th of _, 1996, by the following vote:
AYM: COUNC ERS:
NOES: COUNC ERS:
ABSENT: COUNC ERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
R:@TEP,DA\P,EPOR'RSTAFF31,MIS
TEMECULA COMN4UNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
. ITEA4 1
7
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD APRIL 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:35 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Vice President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Ford, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1-3, with President Roberts abstaining on Item No. 1.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone
1 Minutes
1.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996.
AYES: 2 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts
Minutes.csd\040996 1
2Aareement for July 4th Fireworks Show
2.1Approve agreement with Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of
Temecula's July 4th Fireworks Show.
3Accel2tance of Grant Deed for City Park Site - Kemper Real Estate Development
Corporation (La Serena Way)
3.1Accept the Grant Deed from Kemper Real Estate Development corporation
(KRDC, Inc.) To the City of Temecula for the donation of a 2.8 acre park site
adjacent to Rancho elementary School on La Serena Way.
3.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Grant Deed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4Temecula Duck Pond Master Plan
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson introduced Development Services
Administrator Phyllis Ruse. Ms. Ruse presented the staff report, explaining the
process for developing the master plan. She introduced Vince DiDonado of the
Alhambra Group, who outlined the specific design components.
President Roberts opened the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Hearing no requests to
speak, President Roberts closed the public hearing at 7:50 PM.
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Ford to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
4.1Adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for the Temecula Duck Pond Master
Plan.
4.2Approve the Master Plan for the Temecula Duck Pond.
4.3Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal
public bid for the Temecula Duck Pond.
The motion was unanimously carried with Directors Birdsall and Stone absent.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director of Community Services Nelson reported that the annual Easter Egg Hunt was held
Minutes.csd\040996 2
at two locations on Saturday, April 6, 1996, in which 2,500 people attended. He reported
that next year, three locations will be utilized..
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Ford, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:52 PM to a
meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Birdsall and
Director Stone absent.
Ron Roberts, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, Board Secretary/
City Clerk
Minutes.csd\040996 3
ITEIN4 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE)(
DIRECTOR OF Fl
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Board of Directors
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Release of Bond for Tract 25004-1, Barclay Estates (Seraphina
Road at Jons Place)
PREPARED BY:eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction
of the TCSD slopes and landscaped area within Tract No. 25004-1, Barclay Estates.
BACKGROUND:On January 10, 1995, the Board of Directors entered into a
Parkland/Landscape Agreement with:
JLD Properties
22865 Lake Forest Drive
El Toro, CA 92630
for the construction of slope and landscape areas within Tract No. 25004-1. On May 23,
1 995, the Board of Directors accepted Tract No. 25004-1 into the City's landscape
maintenance program beginning Fiscal Year 1 995-96. On October 10, 1 995, the Board of
Directors reduced the Faithful Performance Bond to a 1 0% warranty amount. The remaining
surety bonds, issued by the Developers Insurance Company, are identified as follows:
1 . Labor and Materials Bond No. 17271 3S in the amount of $1 0,000.00.
2. Faithful Performance Bond No. 1 7271 3S in the amourit of $2,000.00.
Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be
released six months after the satisfactory completion and acceptance of the slope areas,
pending the settlement of any claims or obligations by the developer. The City Clerk has
verified that no claims have been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the
construction of the slope areas.
Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this
project. The remaining 10% warranty amount will be retained for a period of one year and
until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled.
r:\yasinobk\barclay.i&m 042396
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Copy of Labor and Materials Bond.
r:@yssinobk\barelay.l&m 042396
BOND NO. 1727 l@'S
0
SC LAPOR @.i@ 30i@
C, r- -t t 7- -,I 0 ?-N;
I _-_, -
t@-- C'- !a, Stacc o@ C
C--N7@- P'@TNERSHIP
(hcrcinar-Le.- dtsicnat--@ as "Pi-',nc,,'oal") hav ed 'IZ[o A
P=c@,-oL agT---s to irs@ @-id. cc,-zQ!eCe cti-@ Par@d L-npi-ove,-ntics, which sa-id
dait@-'/4A/t,Ak'ci /0 19 @5 , and Id-,ot @ as P,-oiel.: TP-ACT ,'@'25004
is h--:-@bv :-cfe=ed to and Trade a @ar, and
7@ @6.S, u,-ide,- 'Llit t--.=s of @d A,,-,.ezmenl,, Pr,@cipa-I is :--Culred before crit--.'=LY
the work, to file a -ood and sui@-ic' 'L
i,ijori the per-:o=anc-- c- L ient oavment )ond with Lh c C'@y c
to secure the cl;li"-Ls to which reference is 7, a in L -om.Lnenc:A-icr LIOLI
de ' Title 15 (- @ with sec"
308--,) of Pa.-L 4 al' Division of the Civil Code of the State of CalZo @'a; and
DEVELOPERS INSURANCE
we the principal a--Lid COMPANY as Silreif, arc held
@-ici bound unto the C:7
rj' Temecula, Caiifornia, a-ad a.U contractors, subcontractors,
labore,L-s. -maten'alLien, and other persons employed in the iderformanc-- of the aforesaid
-Tc--=er:z a.7.--: to "-,-I --tie 15 of the Civil Code, Lr- tht @en;, I sum o 0
m o r,. c,,, o l@ , h @ -C,, ri@: -@- S La tz s, f o r a,. a t t L", Pt s Lu L-M'sh@ or labor- 'Lhe:-con of any kind, o.-,L@or amounts
the U:aemoloym----t @ur-azct Act wl[,-i to s-Licil Woi-7- or- labo:-,. that SureL-f Fiji
s=--in an = o Li r,,L 7c,L --xct--@z the amount set for-Lh.
aai- o I:' the obLiz::_,-iori s----urt@ he:-cb@, and 'La addiu'o[i ,o the fact a=our@t su----L:icc
4
_Z,4
Ec-,zo@a'D!--
L as
ilicu=--d by 'LZ@ succ2s @ I-; caf,-)rc'LZ- sLic'-- obli(zation, 'Lo
cos:s and L-ic,Llic'ez' in anv jLd2cnenL re.,idc,-ed.
ex-or--ssl.y sLiDulat@ ar-d a-@ :hat ci@, bor:d si irs'Lirt to be::-@,: c).:
and ail com:)aiu'--s and comor-,-zions enrill@ to fL7c c; s un6t.-
(c m -@ n c:'2 zI :,t,, S ?- c,:i c n 3 0o L@ P art 4 c f I) 1,1, I s I o n -@, o -ir t i: e Cv ii C os cs z c z':,;
-v su;t brol-,zht udcri tl-'s bond.
ac-;Lon to tlac.-n or tile;r ar-
If condition o-FtLs bcad is je@Lorm--@-, 'then tl-L:Ls state
o
-27:t =C t--
7-7-1.,t surety stimulates and az-rzts 'that no t--@acL7e, of @i t, ol-
addition to the te=s of the Acrezment or to the work to be per,-o=ed ther--,-,nd--:- or the
-@--,L7icaL,cns accomr)myino,- the same sha.U 'La ar@yway a:-iec-,.its obligations on ties i)onc:. anc
does hereby waive r-otic-- of any such chan-es, extension of @e, alteration or addition to the
tt=s of A,--.-ztnr or to the worl- or to the specifications.
@S OF, tLs instruml enc has been dul-v exe--uc@ by the P '=cl:Dai and
above n=td, on DEC@ER !4rh 19 94
s (Seai)
D-7VELO@ INSU@-NCE C P.@0?7 FOR-NII C-7N7pA7
<- -2
3y: B
URENO
At::ornev-In--7act Z.@ERi)L.
-A-PPROV= AS TO FORM:
Scot-L F. Field
Ciry ArLomey
3
STATT OF Calif ornia
Ss.
COUNI@'OF San Bernardino
On Dece-n:)er IA, 199z, before me, MICKAEL J. HENSEL
PEI',SONAL'LIY APPEA@-D E. URELQO
personally known to me (or pro%,eci to me on the basis of
satist I actor-,, evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/',i@-e sub scribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
e,jl,cd to me trial, he /s,'-ie/Lliev executed the same L -i his/
I
iierl"their iuthorizcd cap-icity(ies), and that bv his/her/
%i-.'l C HA@ EL
the r s -@aLure(s) on the instrument the persoii(s), or the
en.1v@@ uc)on 'L)el-,alf of which t.lie person(s) acted, executed NOTARI D'j3L;C
u
i-EN S
+ OPA@E r-@,,TY
the instrument. My Co I-.95
WiTiNESS mv hand and official seal.
Si-na@e Tltis arct7 for qqjcial Notarial Scal
OPTIONAL
Thouch the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
1-1 CORPORATE OFFICER
and Material Bond
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
LIM,[T=-D
GENERAL One
ORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBPR OF PAGES
TRUST-@=-(SI,
GUARDIAN/CONS@RVATOR
OTHER: Dece,-iber 14. 199z,
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAMEC)P PE RSON(S) ORENTI-Y(IES) None
:)EVE 7 OP7FS 7@NSU.@NCE CO@L@A-N',-'
SIGN=-R(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOV=-
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOIVLEDGENIENT
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNI
AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
@, IRVINE, CA 92713 (714) 263-'@1300
P,O. BOX 1972@ N,@ 9@9@64
7 :o,,Cr -.even granted SnE!l t.'l an@ eve.,i@ ze,,niraTr, or, :-ie i si of r
c L;n ass :@e sea: 7E,,: C'@,vr" ir"
S:Z:
KNO@@,' A-L MEN 2Y HES=- PRESENTS. tl,.at. exceot as expressly finiled. INDEMNITY COM.;,Ati.Y C=
:c,eraiiy, but no@r-,eec)@ rna),,e. constitute and appoint
'*-SL'SANC.MONTEON,ALIC7-RODRIGIJ MIC.HELLEHA@@S7-,P-.'LJ'R @-@4 0,
MIC,'IAFL j. HENSEL, JOINTLI- OR SEVER'@LLY---
tr,@e i,@ie ano law.ul A@ornevis@-in-Pa.-@. to make ex-cu,-, @-livE-, arc a.-Kpo-jeage for and on t)erialf of eac:, Z)! saic; corporations as sureties. n3-,cz anc ccnTa--:s c:
su,etvs@-.,.- ir, an @-r,-ount not exceeciirg Two Million Five HLincrec 7not.-sanC Dollars (S2.500,OCO) in any single urcer,.aKing, givirg anc @-!c c :jii
-,,Dwe- autrorit@ t@ co and to ceriorr-i every act necessary. requisite or prooer to be done in connection tnerewitn as eacri of said corporations coulo cc. out rese-vinc: @L, aC7 C7
sa,c corporations f@ll power of substitution and revocatior'. and all of tne acts of said Attorney@s)-In-Fac,,. pursuant to tt)ese presents. are meredv ratitiec anc -Ontirme@.
7he au-,-ority and cowers conferred by his Power of Attorney co not extend to ary of tr)e following bonds. undertakings or contracts of surerys,.iio
Bank depositors boncs. mortgage Deficiency boncs. mortgage guarantee bonds, guarantees of installment paper. note guarantee bonds, bonds an financial institutions. lease
bonds. nsurance company qualifying bonds, self-insure, s bonds, fidelity bonds or bail bonds.
This Power of Attorney is granted a@ is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the tallowinc resolutions adoorec by @e respective Doa,cs ol D:@ez-,c,s c' INDEMN17Y
COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA a,)c DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, effective as of Sectemoer 24 19@IE
-E@ -ran of the @oarc. the President anc any Vice President of tne coroara:jo,,i be a-i@- na@ eac::, cl @em ,ere@v is, auz,@c-!-=- t
-Z)L@'=-C) !na: tr)e Chair C, exec@:e Powers O'
QualiNing -.@ atiornev@si named in trie Powers of Attorney to execute. on t)enalf of Ine corporation, bonds, undertakings and contracs of suretysn@D, anc tnat the Secretary or any Ass,s-
tant Secretary of the corporation be, and each of tnem hereby is. autnorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney:
R=-S@)LVED. FURTHER, trial the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile. and any such Power of
Attorney or certificate bearing such tacsir,,iile signatures shall be valid anc binding upon the corporation when so atfixec and in @e future wi@. rescec', to any bond, uncterlai(tric; or
of suretyship to wnic', it is artacr)ec.
@N WIT@@IESS WHEREOF, INDEMN17Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have @everally caused these presents to be signec oy ,esoec:-
five Presidents anc attested nv their respective Secretaries tri:s I st day of April, 1993.
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
By By
ATTEST A77ES7
Ev By
Walter Crowell Walter Crowell
Secretary Secretary
STATE OF CALIFOR@NIA)
Ss
C-, A:)r:: ' 1993, before -e -!rese 7aafua. c)erso,)ailv ac:)eared C)anie V@ncenti. Jr. and Walter Crowell. personally Known to me (or provided to me on the basis of satisfactory
E!@ cencei :@. @e tr)e rersonis@ wnose r,,ar,,iets@ is,are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledgec to me trial he/Sne/ttiey executed lrle sar.-ie in his/her/tieir autnorizea
caDac,,,v(tes@l, ano Tna@ n, n,s/her/tr)e,r signa-,urelsi on the nstrumen, the @erson@s), or the entity upon benalf of which tne person@s) ac,,ec. executed Ine instrument
rn, a7c ol,ciai seai
O;:;:ICIA@ SEAL
TIR-R_SA TAAFUA
NOTA@ P'-'BLIC - CAL!FOR,@JiA
@@RINCJPAL CR;:ICE IN +
C--u.-4TY
My co-mss,on Ez A@. 4, 1995 o
CERTIFICATE
a-Sen,or @,@,ce P@es C.,)@ of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Senior Vice Pres;cer,! of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, coes neret)y
-- -72Z'eC erra anc: nas rc@ beer, eVOKc-c@ and tur,,r,.err,@iore. lna: trie :)rovisior-.s o' !he -esolutions of 'he rescec,,:ve
ec@cS C, sa.c se! total @- :ne @c,-e, of A',,,ornev, are n force as of free date O' trtis Cer,,iticate
Decembe--
Tr@,s Ceritf,cate s executed @r, ,.,ie C;rv of @r-vi,,)e, Cal;torr)ia, @is cay of . 199
IND' -Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
By
e iqel
Se,n o, Vice President Senior Vice President
I
ITEA4 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF Fl
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: April 23, 1 996
SUBJECT: Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park Coscan Homes
California, Inc. (Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY: @eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of Nicolas Road
Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc.
BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1 994, the Board of Directors entered into a Park
Land/Landscape Agreement with:
Coscan Homes Califronia, Inc.
12865 Pt. Del Mar, #200
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the construction of Nicolas Road Park, a 3.0 acre neighborhood park located at the
northwest corner of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road. On October 10, 1995,the
Board of Directors accepted the dedication of the park and subsequently exonerated the
Faithful Performance Bond on October 1 7, 1 995. The remaining surety bonds, issued by The
Reliance Insurance Company, are identified as follows:
1 .Labor and Materials Bond No. B2482314/11107 l,in the amount of $1 22,638.75.
2.Parkland Warranty Bond No. B248231 5/111072,in the amount of $24,527.75.
Pursuantto the Park Land/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be
released six months after the completion and acceptance of the park, pending the settlement
of any claims or obligations by the developer. The City Clerk has verified that no claims have
been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the construction of Nicolas Road Park.
Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this
facility. The remaining Warranty Bond shall be retained for a period of one year and until any
claims filed during the warranty period have been settled.
r:\yasinobk\niclaprk.l&m 042396
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Labor and Materials Bond.
r:\ynsinobk\nicisprk.l&m 042396
BOND NO. B2482314/111071
Premium:Included in Per'@'ormance
Bond
CITY OF CULA
PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND MA BOND
S, the City of Temecula, State of California, and COSCAN DAVIDSON
HO,\IES(hereinafter designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement wherebv
Principala--rees to install and complete certain Parkland Improvements, which said Agreement.
RORIPAUGH - NEIGHBORHOOD
dat@August 23 19 94 , and identified as project PARK, TRACT 27827
is herebyreferred to and made a pan hereof; and
S, under the terms -of said Agreement, Principal is required before enterinc,
upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of
Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
im
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and
RELIANCE INSU-@CE
NOW, ORE, we the principal and COMPANY as Surety, are held
and f@y bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors,
laborers, materialmen, and other persons emploved in the performance of the aforesaid
122,638.75 -----
AL,r@ment and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of S/ , lawful
monev of the United States. for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts
due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will
pav the same in an amount not exceedin- the amount set forth.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attomey's fees, incurred bv City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as
I
costs and included in any judgement rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and a.U persons,. companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to -ive a ri@ht
of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in fuU force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and
it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
IN WITNF-SS OF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Suretv above named, on AUGUST 10 19 94
2
(Seal) (Seai)
SURETY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY PRINCIPAL COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES
B . @ 1/1
KATSUKO TAKATA R. Bornemann
(NAM:E) (NAM:E)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Sr. Vice President
(TITLE) (TITLE)
By:
L)
E.Dale Gleed
(NAMT-)
Director of Enqineering
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rson
C@ Attorney
3
ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY
S-i@kTE OF CALIFORNIA
Count)! of SAN FRANCISCO
On AUGUST 10, 1994
RATSLTKO TAKATA, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY
before me, T.A. FE@IANICH, NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose namejs isare
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heishe/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. T.A. FERMANICH
COMM. #1010840
Signature (Seal) rCT4.RY PUBLIC-CALIFC)RNA
C@ty & COulty ot San Franc;sro
MY Comm. F-xDires Dec. 17. 1997
State of Califorilia
Ss.
")Ulltv of e@
oil 1 7- before me,
Notary Public, persondliy appeared
pcrsoiialtv known to me (,&F pF@@4 te ;;;@ on iiie basis of to be the person(s') whose
iiaiiie(s) @are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that iie,lsiie/thev executed the
sailic in /tliclr authorized capacity(les), and that by their signatures on the instrument tile
I)crsoii(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed tile instrument.
WITN@S i-ny hand and official sea].
LYNN C NOR
Sicyiiature (Seal) Cwm t 998758
PMUC - C"O"M
Son @o @
Wm ExDon Jun. 27, 1
FD-1 (12/90)
T)@'rL@CE INS@NCE CO.NfP@N-Y
HEAD OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Sta,
-f Pennsylvania. does hereby make. constitute and appoint Ketsuka Takata, individually, of Son Francisco, California, its true and lawt,
Atiorney(s)-tn-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, and as its act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings or
suretyship and to bind the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings anc
other wrrtings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and
attested by one other of such officers. and hereby ratifies and confirms all.that its said Atiorney(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof.
This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article Vil of the By-Laws of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY which
became effective September 7, 1 978, which provisions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows:
ARTICLE Vil - EXECUTION OF BOt4DS AND UNDERTAKING
1 . The Board of Directors, the President, the Chairman of the Board, any Vice PreskWnL " Vice F'Te@errt or Assistant Vice
President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and @hority 10 (at appoint Anorney(s)-ir,-Pac,, and IC)
authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and under-takings, recognizances, contracts of fvty and Other writings
c,',)Iigatory in the nature thereof, and (b) to remove any such Artorney(s)-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power a@ L fly @n to them.
2. Anorney(s)-i@oci shall have power and a@rity, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued lo tnem. to
execute wW deirver on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contr@s of indemnity and other writings obligatory in
the nature thereof. The cocpcxate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings, recognizance&, contracts of indemnity
and other writings obligatory in the nature @eol.
3. Artorneyis)-in-Faci OwO have poweir and y to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of
indemnity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings and they shall also have power and authority to certify the financial statement of the
Company and to copies of the By-Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof.
This Power of ATTo@y is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by @ority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors
of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY at a rneeting @ an the 5th day of June, 1979, at which a quorum was present, and said Resolution
has not been amended or repealed:
'Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such
Power of Attorney or any certificates relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing
such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such Power so executed
and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, in the future with
respect to any bond or undertaking to which n is attached.'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vic* President
and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, This 13 @ of October, 1993
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY
STATE OF Washington
COUNTY OF King Ss.
On this 13 day of October, 1993 pesonally appeare rence W. Caristrom
to me known to be the Vice Preskient of the RELIANCE INS no acknowledged that he executed and attested the
foreooing instrLimenT and affixed the seal of said corpor r-ticie Vil, Section 1, 2, and 3 of the By-Laws of said
Company,and tt)e Resolution, set forth therein, are still in ft
L7
y Public in and for State of Washington
siding at Sumner
1. Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of the RELJANCE INSI hereby certify Thai the above and foregoing is a true and
correct copy of a Power of Attorney executed by s@ REL@ ANY, which is still in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hweunto set my hand and a ompany this 1 OTH day of AUGUST 19 9 4.
Assistant Secretary
ODR-1431 Ed 3/S3
0
ITEIN4 4
- i
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRI
CITY MA AG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Award of Contract for Construction of Sports Park Creek Restoration
(Project No. PW95-10CSD)
PREPARED BY:Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the Sports Park Creek
Restoration Project PW95-10CSD.
2.Award a construction contract in the amount of $195,059.00to R. K. Allen Landscape
Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract.
3.Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency of $1 9,505.90 which is equal to 1 0% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On January 24, 1 995, the Board of Directors approved the Master Plan for the Parkview Site
which included re-vegetation and stabilization of the slopes within the flood control channel
at the Rancho California Sports Park. The portion of the creek to be restored lies south of
Rancho Vista Road between the Community Recreation Center and the Skate Board Park.
The Creek Restoration Project improvements will include landscaping along the channel slopes,
slope protection, drainlines beneath the ball fields to reduce surface ponding and a
decomposed granite pathway along the north channel bank adjacent to the existing baseball
fields. A concrete walkway will be constructed adjacent to the decomposed granite pathway
as a bid alternate. Improvements to the channel will aid in silt removal from final deposition
into Lake Village.
r:\agdrpt\96\0.423\pw95-IO.awd
The engineer's base bid estimate for this project is $220,900.
Ten bids for the project were publicly opened on April 1 1, 1996 and the results shown below
include the base bid and the one alternate.
1. R. K. Allen Landscape $195,059.00
2. Oakridge Landscape $199,382.58
3. Pro-Civil Engineer Engineering $227,357.88
4. Wakeham-Baker $244,394.00
5. Mentone Turf $249,412.95
6. TNT Grading $249,555.50
7. Academy Development $288,760.50
8. Slater, Inc $289,145.00
9. Plaza Landscape, Inc $306,237.00
10. Sean Malek Engineering $320,657.50
Staff has contacted the State Contractors License Board and confirmed that the license is
current and in good standing. '.;Ve have also contacted references supplied by R.K. Landscape
Construction regarding the quality, timeliness and accuracy of previous work. We have
received favorable comments from Government agencies for work of a similar scope.
References contacted included the County of San Diego and the City of San Marcos.
A total of 1 1 1 working days have been allowed for construction which is scheduled to begin
in mid May of 1996 and be completed by early November 1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project will be funded by Development Impact Fees for Parks and a $100,000grant from
the State Department of California Water Resources, $50,000 of which has already been
received. The Development Impact Fees are budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement
Program for FY 1995-1996, Account No. 210-190-138-5804. The total project cost of
$214,564.90 includes the contract amount of $195,059.00 plus the 1 0% contingency of
$19,505.90.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Construction Contract
r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-IO.awd
ATTACHMENT1
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
-3- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\pw95-IO.awd
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD
SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23 day of April, 1996, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and R.K. Allen
Landscape Construction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1 . a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal,
Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled
PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD, SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State
of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.)
where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the
latest version of the Standard Specifications fnr Public Works Construction,
including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative
Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, 'Standard Specifications') as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical
Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD, SPORTS PARK- CREEK
RESTORATION. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the
publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction
materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the
General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
Project No. PW95-10CSD. Sports Park Creek Restoration.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be
used in lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms,
but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and
installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be
CONIRACT r: @cip\projects\pw95- 10\contmctiajp
0
used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish -all labor,
materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone
shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and
any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-10CSD
SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3.CITY APPR@. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE
HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND FIFTY-NINE DOLLARS and ZERO CENTS
($195,059.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED
ELEVEN (111) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY.
Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6. PAYMENTS,
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a
CONTRACT 2 r.\cip\projccu\pw95-10\contract/ajp
sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the
bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th)
day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if
unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after
acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an
Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment
is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that
the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial
payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part
of the work.
D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section
7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMO@ RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
$25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3%
$75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount
in excess of $500,000
8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
CO,NTRACT 3 r: \cip kprojecta\pw95- I O\contmct/nip
10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1 773.8, 1 775, 1 776, 1 777.5, 1 777.6, and 1 81 3 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1 775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for anv ivork done jnder this Ccrtract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
1 1. TIME OF TH ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
1 3.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
1 5.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
1 6.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
CONI'RACT 4 r. \cip\proj@\pw95- I O\contmct/ajp
17.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
21.ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
22.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
431 74 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on
the date first above written.
L-d A T c-: D:CONTRACTOR
R.K. Allen Landscape Construction
Robert K. Allen
3589 Valencia Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92404
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
CONTRACT r: \cip\proj=w\pw95- 10\contmct/ajp
DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT 6 r.@\projem\pw95-10\contmcttajp
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECvg -
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
Construction of the Parkview Fire Station began on January 3, 1 996. Great West
Contractors is the general contractor for the project. The foundation has been poured and
the next stage is the construction of the building.
The Rancho California Creek Restoration Project bid opening is scheduled for April 1 1 ,
1 996. Award of Contract will go to City Council on April 23, 1996 and construction will
start in May 1 996. The City of Temecula and Union for a River Greenbelt Environment
(URGE) have received a $50,000 grant toward this project from the California Department
of Water Resources and will receive a second $50,000 grant upon completion of the
construction.
The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is nearing completion of
construction. Upon completion, the project will enter a 90 day maintenance period. Staff
anticipates this park will be open to the public in July, 1996. The improvements will
include parking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skateboard facility,
restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system.
On December 19, 1 995, the City Council awarded the construction contract to Mahr
Construction for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project. The foundation has
been poured and the masonry construction has begun.
The Temecula Duck Pond Master Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on April 9,
1 996. As part of the overall Master Plan, the fencing at the park site was removed and
replaced. The park is currently closed for turf renovations.
The second submittal of construction documents, for the City Hall and Maintenance Yard
Projects, were received the week of April 1, 1 996. The construction documents are
currently in plan check and staff anticipates the project will go out to bid April 9, 1 996. It
is anticipated that these projects will move forward on a similar time table and be
completed in the fall, 1 996.
R:,AIACENDASIDE@ 9,1996
Construction documents are also being prepared for Margarita Community Park. The first
phase of the Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping,
irrigation, and pedestrian walkways. The bid will also include additive alternates for a roller
hockey rink, tennis courts, and improvements to the adjacent school district baseball fields.
Staff will bring forward a recommendation for a joint use agreement between the school
district and the City for improvements to and maintenance of the fields.
On February 27, 1 996, the Board of Directors approved the Acquisition Agreement for the
Winchester Creek park site. A project design committee will be formed with members of
the Community Services Commission, City Council, staff and the public.
On February 27, 1 996, the Board of Directors approved the Acquisition Agreement for the
Temecula Town Center and Rotary Park site. Staff is looking at various human services
programs, which will be implemented when the City takes possession of this facility in
September, 1996.
R:'A\AGENDAMDE@ Ap.1 9,1996
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
. ITEA4 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD APRIL 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
7:52 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Undemans
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTA
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR.
It was moved by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
AGENCY BUSINESS
2Purchase Agreement for 28535 and 28545 Puiol Street
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Minutes.rda\040996 -1-
It was moved by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
OAGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIEIS LOCATED
AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
2.2Authorize the expenditures of up to $196,840 from RDA Housing set-aside
funds for acquisition, relocation, and closing costs.
2.3Authorize the transfer of $170,000 from account 165-199-999-5449 to 165-
199-812-5804.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall
3Relocation A.Ssistance Services
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Ford to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
3.1Authorize the execution of a contract with Pacific Relocation Consultants in a
form acceptable to the City Attorney and Executive Director for the provision
of relocation assistance services.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall
Minutes.rda\040996 -2-
4Rancho West Apartments Project
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Ford to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
4.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A REGULATORY AGREEMENT WITH COACHELLA
VALLEY HOUSING COALITIONS AND A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH
BANK OF AMERICA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE 33334.14
4.2Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DESIGNATING THE SUM OF $150M,000 FROM THE AGENCIES
LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND AS THE MATCHING FUNDS
FOR THE HOME PROGRAM GRANT FOR THE RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS
PROJECT
4.3Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTI-
FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND THE LOAN OF THE PROCEEDS
THEREOF TO COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITIONK, AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS AND APPROVING OTHER
RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall
Minutes.rda\040996 -3-
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:02 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 P.M.,
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion
was unanimously carried with Chairperson Birdsall and Agency Member Stone absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
Minutes.rda\040996 -4-
ITEIN4 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICFR@@
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Great Temecula Tractor Race
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members consider a request for sponsorship of the 1996 Great Temecula
Tractor Race.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has received the annual sponsorship request in the amount of $10,000 from the Great
Temecula Tractor Race, which is attached for your review.
Due to the fact that this activity promotes tourism in Temecula, funding would come from the
Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. There will be no commissions paid out
to any party for the City of Temecula's sponsorship.
The Great Temecula Tractor Race encountered between 1 9,000 to 26,000 in attendance in
previous years at each event. It draws entrants, spectators, and vendors from areas throughout
California as well as fioi-n other states filling up local hotels and restaurants. The event brought
into the community a large number of merchant sales and tax dollars, in addition to the tourism
dollars earned supporting local merchants for goods and services used by the event.
Last year the City of Temecula received wide spread media exposure from this event through
newspaper, magazine, radio, and television coverage on local and national levels. Newspaper
coverage on this event exceeded 2.6 million impressions and appeared in major newspapers as
the Los Angeles Times, Orange County Register, and the San Diego Union Tribune.
Newspapers from Ventura County to the San Diego/Mexico Border, and all of the Desert
Newspapers are included in the publicity blitz.
The City of Temecula will be given a full page color ad in the Great Temecula Tractor Race
brochure, in addition to the City's logo being placed on flyers that will be distributed to
advertise this event. Various media stations in San Diego, Los Angeles and Riverside County
will receive free promotional materials.
The Tractor Race received magazine coverage equaling over 300,000 impressions and appeared
in magazines as the San Diego Home and Garden, San Diego Business Journal, Los Angeles
Reader, Country Review, and RV Magazine.
Television coverage included major network stations as KALA, NBC - San Diego, KTTV - Fox,
CBS/KNX Los Angeles, and KABC - Weekend Calendar. Radio coverage reached areas in Los
Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Francisco, and Sacramento.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient monies are budgeted in the RDA to fund this request.
ATTACHMENTS:Sponsorship Package for the City of Temecula
Temecula Town Association Proposed 1996 Budget
Marketing and Promotions -
Television Publicity
Radio Publicity
Magazine/Newspaper Publicity
ATTACHMENT
SPONSORSEU PACKAGE FOR TITE CITY OF TEMECULA
aCity representative invited to ride in the Grant Entry parade.
.Complimentary general admission tickets. Twenty (20) each day.
.Complimentary V.I.P. eight (8) tickets each day.
.Eight (8) parking passes.
.Right of first refusal for 1997 event.
0Full page color ad in the Great Temecula Tractor Race brochure.
.City Logo printed on flyers for distribution.
Various media stations in San Diego, Los Angeles and Riverside County to receive free
promotional materials.
Cost of Event Location Sponsorship Package:
$10,000
ATTACMENT
rp
2 6 lclq5
L-==
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATIOR --------------------
P.O. BOX 435
TEMECULA, CA 92593
DEPT. 3
PROPOSED 1996 BUDGET
199@
BUDGET
INCOME
ADMISSIONS 50,000
BEER/BAR 30,000
CARNIVAL 4,000
ENTRIES 5,000
EVENT PARKING 3,000
RV PARKING 1,000
PROGRAM 5,000
SOUVENIRS 2,5-@0
SPONSORS 35,000
VENDORS 15,000
CHILI COOK OFF 2,000
T
KIDS FAIRE 3,000
TOTAL INCOME $155,500
EXPENS7-:-z
ADV=-RTISING & PROMOTION $ 12,000
Aw'a=-nS 2,000
-? /Em= - 10,.000
C'H-77 COOK OFF 2,000
CCMI,!-T-cS!CNS -PFOGRAM 500
- SPIDN-CDF 500
4@000
DON@-77-ODIS - sr-@vicv- i.ooc,
12/000
"'.Z 7 N M 7 !-,I T 20 OOC)
RE@ITAL 1 5 0 0 C
I-Ns'jRA.NCE - GENE.-@A7- 2,400
F@IDS F@-IFE 2,500
PE@?,T'rC
300
1,000
3,500
5,000
",P T -V
12,000
500
S7-E 3,000
S C @TVE N I R S 1,500
E 7 T ')OC
--Fz.-c;z DT@-c=CEmL 3 000
TT-TT 7-r'r7S 1 'OOC
WR-RK PZR--7E@
- 5 0 0-
116 400
9,100
ATTACHMENT'
27540 YNEZ SUITE J-9 TEMECULA, CA 92591 (909) 676-7875 FAX (909) 676-5921
Marketing & Promotions
of the
1995 GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
kNr) PU,%IPKINJ RON
PUBLICITY:
LONG LEAD -REGIONAL TO NATIONAL
Publicity for the GrEat Temecula Tractor Race begins in.May with media kits. being
mailed to approximately 60 national and regional magazines. Outdoor and
recreational vehicle magazines are stressed since these publications reach a greater
percentage of our targeted audience. The partial list includes:
Westways, Arizona Highways, American Way - lnflight, Coast to Coast
Magazine, Los Angeles Magazine, Mature Traveler, National Motorist (Allstate
Magazine), Orange Coast Magazine, Phoenix Home & Garden, San Diego
Magazine, San Francisco Focus Southern California Guide, Where
Magazine, Sunset Magazine, RV West Magazine, California Toursim
Publication, National Motorist, Motorhome, Outdoors Magazine, and Trailer
Life.
PUBLICITY BLITZ:
Beginning in July regional newspapers and magazines are targetted with Tractor Race
Entertainment Bulletins and General Information Media Kits for upcoming
Entertainment Calendar publication. Mailings are sent to over 100 contacts at least
twice during the nextfou. months.
Newspaper calendar sections totalling over 100 are mailed in August, and
September. Newspapers from Ventura County to the San Diego/Mexico Border, and
all Desert Newspapers are included in the blitz.
TELEVISION CAMPAIGN:
Souvenir sweatshirts,, t-shirt5, mugs and hats are mailed to all television stations with
local news casts.. These stations include KABC -7 L.A., KNBC - L.A., KCBS - 2 L.A.,
KTLA -5 L.A., KCAL - 9 L.A., KTTV-FOX - 1 1 L.A. KGTV-ABC San Diego, KFMB - CBS
San Diego, KNSD - NBC San Diego, and KETV -Fox San Diego. Packets are mailed
both to weather reporters and sportscasters.
ADVERTISING CONSULTATIONS PUBLIC RELATIONS MEDIA PLANNING - WRITING
ATTAC@NT
Television Stations Coverina the 1995 Event:
a
0. C. N
NASHVILLE NETWORK
i(TU,
CBS/KNX L.A.
KTTV - FOX
NBC - San Diego
KING CABLE -
30 spots through weekend
Entertainment Calendar
October 6 a.m.
October a.m.
October a.m.
Lake Elsinore Daily Calendar Announcements
KABC - Weekend Calendar
inland Valley Cablevision Calendar
PSAs Broadcast on the Followin,-.
KFAXSan Francisco
KFBKSacramento
KAHISacramento
KK=Ventura Oxnard
KNZRBakersfield
KCINVictorville
KRKCSan Bernardino
KPRLSLO
KFIVMODESTO
K)AXStockton
KMGGSanta Rosa
KUBAYuba
KPCOQuincy
KWSDRedding
KMGXLA Metro
KKLALA Metro
KMPCLA Metro
KWRPSan Jacinto
KORGOrange County
KCKCRiverside
TICKET GIVEAWAYS WITH 30 SECOND SPOTS
KOW -San Diego
KSPASan Diego
KRTMTemecula
KATYHemet/San Jacinto
KDESPalm Springs
KMETBanning Beaumont
KGRBLos Angeles
KPSIPalm Springs
KKOSSan Diego
ATTACHMENT
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING:
The Great Temecula Tractor Race arranged media sponsorships with radio, newspapers and magazines
throughout the Southland. Marketing begins in August with the printing and distribution of over I 0,000
flyers. Print advertising in the Bargain Bulletin, Pennysaver - -3an Diego and Orange County, begins in
August, as well 3S the Riverside County/Harte Hank Pennysavers. The Californian and The Press Enterprise
advertising beginning in September and continuing until the Tractor Race. The Press Enterprise printed an
insert which was distributed to 30,000 subscribers.
Posters are distributed by Budweiser 4 weeks prior to the event and are sent to Riverside County Vendors
and restaurant bars. Plus posters and flyers are distributed throughout the Temecula Valley.
RADIO
Radio advertising begins in SEPTEMBER on local stations, KRTM and KATY FM and in Banning/Beaumont
KMET. San Diego Country Station KOW promoted the event with ticket giveaways and commercials.
Major market stations in Los Angeles, Orange County, Inland Empire and San Diego County are
approached in February for ticket and promotional giveaways. PSA'S for the Tractor Races on these
stations usually begin two weeks prior to the Event and Ticket Giveaways are conducted during the final
week. Budweiser supports the Tractor Race with advertising on KCAL/Kola radio.
ATTACHMENT
RESULTS:
PRINT IMPRESSIONS:
As a result of this campaign the 1995 Great Temecula Tractor Race received coverage in the following
magazines equaling over 300,000 impressions:
Country Party News
San Diego Reader
Family Focus
San Diego Home and Garden
inland Empire magazine
Copley Newspapers
San Diego Union Tribune
Anaheim Bulletin
Menifee Valley News
Sun Tribune
Hemet News
Times Advocate
Menifee News
Newspapers coverin- the event - total impressions exceeded 2.6 million.
Country Review
Los Angeles Reader
RV Magazine
San Diego Around
San Diego Business journal
Good Sam Magazine
Los Angeles Times
inland Dailv Bulletin
O.C. Register
Rancho News
Californian
Sun City News
Press Enterprise
Blade Citizen
Chino News
Advertising Dollars Spent/or in-kind for the Great Temecula Tractor Race: $ 53,000.
Additional advertising in the Bargain Bulletin and Pennysavers equaled a distribution of over 1.5 million
copies/readers.
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
. ITEIN4 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD APRIL 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:16 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT:3 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Undemans
ABSENT:2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
Authority Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
1 . Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Roberts
Minutes.fa
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Roberts, seconded by Board Member Ford to adjourn at
8:17 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with
Chairperson Birdsall and Board Member Stone absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
r:\minutes.fa\032696 -2-
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
. ITEI\4 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
HELD APRIL 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 8:17 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT:3 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans
ABSENT:2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
Authority Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
1 Minutes
1.1Approve the minutes of March 26, 1996.
AYES: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Roberts
Minutes.otwa\040996
ADJOURNMENT
it was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Roberts to adjourn at
8:17 PM to a meeting on April 23, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
Minutes.otwa\040996 -2-
ITEIN4 23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANQE
CITY MMAGER
T
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council adopt the resolutions described below.
1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
2.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
3.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
PROCEEDINGS
R:INORTONLLAGENDASIFINANCNG.AGN 04116196
BACKGROUND: The California Government Code requires that, prior to the formation
by a public agency of any community facilities district that will finance improvements to be
owned and operated by another public agency, the public agencies enter into a joint
community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement. The Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority"'@ -as
undertaken proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities Distric-, !,'o. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'CFD'), and it is proposed that the CFD finance
various public improvements to be owned and operated by the City, all as specified in a
proposed Joint Community Facilities Agreement for the City and the Authority.
The Director of Public Works has reviewed the proposed agreement and the list of
improvements to be owned by the City attached thereto. The form of the agreement is on
file with the City Clerk, and City Staff recommends that the City Council approve the
agreement and that it be executed and delivered by the City Manager, so that the Authority
can proceed with the formation of the CFD.
The City and the Redevelopment Agency have entered into a joint exercise of powers
agreement creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the "Improvement
Authority'), in order to accommodate a proposed financing structure for public
improvements in the Old Town area of the City and for the Western Bypass. The proposed
structure for the financing has been simplified, and the Improvement Authority is no longer
required to assist in the financing.
The Improvement Authority has not, to date, entered into any contracts or issued or
incurred any debt. City Staff now recommends that the City Council move to terminate the
Improvement Authority, subject to adoption by the Redevelopment Agency of a resolution
also terminating the Improvement Authority, in order to avoid the incurrence of any future
administrative costs in respect to the Improvement Authority. If it is ever needed in the
future, the Improvement Authority can be reestablished by execution of a new joint exercise
of powers agreement by the City and the Agency when such a need arises.
The City has conducted proceedings to form an assessment district to finance the first
phase of the Western Bypass Corridor. It is expected that those improvements will be
financed by the CFD, so that the assessment district is no longer necessary. Accordingly,
City Staff recommends that the assessment district proceedings be abandoned, contingent
upon the issuance of bonds by the Authority for the CFD in an amount sufficient to finance
the Western Bypass improvements.
Attachments:Resolutions (3)
Joint Community Facilities Agreement
R., INORTONL IAGENDASIFINANCNG. A GN 04116196
RESOLUTTON NO. 96.-
A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY COUNCIEL OF THE Crff OF
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DMWTING TIIE EXECUTTON AND
DELIVERY OF A JOINT CO FAC AG WrM
THE OILD TOWN/WESTS]IDE CO FAC DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORrff
, the Old Town[Westide Community Facilities District Financing Authority
(the 'Authority') intends to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
improvements) (the 'District") in order to finance certain public improvements in the Old
Town area of the City of Temecula (the 'City') and to finance the first phase of the Western
Bypass, and some of the public improvements to be financed will be owned and/or operated,
when completed, by the City (the Public Improvements'); and
WHEREAS, in order to enable the District to ftmce the Public Improvements,
Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority
enter into a joint community facilities agreement with respect to the Public Improvements prior
to the formation of the District; and
VMEREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement, by and between the City
and the Authority (the 'Agreement') has been filed with the City Clerk and the City Council,
with the assistance of City Staff , has reviewed the Agreement and the City Council now
desires to approve the Agreement and direct its execution and delivery.
NOW, THEREFORIE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
1. Approval of Agreement, The City Council hereby approves the Agreement, in the
form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to
execute and deliver the Agreement in such form together with any changes therein deemed
advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney and the City Director
of Public Works, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution
and delivery by the City of the Agreement. The City Council hereby declares that the
Agreement will be beneficial to the residents of the City.
2. Official Ac@ The City Manager, Finance Director, Director of Public Works,
City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all
actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the Agreement or the
formation of the District, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all
certificates, documents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or
desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution.
RESOSIOO
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATMT:
June S. Greek, City Clerk CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF I]DE) SS
CrrY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTTFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at regulu meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:COUNC]ILMENMERS:
NOES:COUNCEL ERS:
ABSENT:COUNCEL ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
@os 100
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
VMEREAS, the City of Temecula (the 'City') and the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula (the 'Agency') are parties to the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the 'Agreement') creating the Old Town/Westside
Improvement Authority (the 'Authority'); and
VMEREAS, the Authority has never entered into any contracts or issued any Bonds
(as defined in the Agreement) and the City Council now desires to terminate the Agreement
and the Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
1. Termination of Agreement and Auth@ The Agreement and the Authority are
terminated, subject to adoption by the Agency of a resolution also terminating the Agreement
and the Authority.
2. Official Actions, The Mayor, City Manager, City Clerk and all other officers of
the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or
desirable hereunder with respect to the termination of the Agreement and the Authority,
including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates or instruments
which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the
purposes of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
Rftw 101
STATE OF CALI]FORNIA)
COUNTY OF IDE) SS
CrrY OF ULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the city of Temecula, Y DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll caU vote:
AYES: COUNC]IL ERS:
NOES: COUNCIIL ERS:
ABSENT: COUNC]IL ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, cmC
Resos 101
RESOLLTTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMIECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF TEMIECULA
Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District No. 95-1
RESOLVED, by the City Council (the 'Council') of the City of Temecula (the 'City'),
County of Riverside (the 'County'), State of California, that:
1. Resolution of Intention.- This Council has undertaken special assessment
proceedings (the 'Proceedings') pursuant to its Resolution No. 95-103, 'A Resolution of
Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements' (the 'Resolution of Intention') adopted by
the Council under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 10 of the Streets and
Highways Code of California (the 'Act') on December 12, 1995, in and for the City's Western
Bypass Corridor Assessment District No. 95-1 (the 'Assessment District').
2. Boundary @ In the Proceedings, this Council has heretofore caused a Map of
Proposed Boundaries of the Assessment District to be filed of record in the office of the
Recorder of the County on December 14, 1995, at the hour of 8:00 o'clock a.m. in Book 40
of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page 83 (the 'Boundary Map').
3. Abandonment of Proceedings, This Council has now determined to abandon the
Proceedings for the Assessment District, contingent upon the issuance of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facility
District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvement) 1996 Special Tax Bonds (the 'CFD
Bonds') and hereby orders that from and after the date of issuance of the CFD Bonds the
Proceedings be finally and completely abandoned. No further action shall be taken with
respect to the Proceedings by the Council, following the issuance of the CFD Bonds including,
but not limited to, the imposition and collection of any special assessments in the Assessment
District.
4. Recording Ordered, Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and
Highways Code, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed, following the date of
issuance of CFD Bonds, to cause to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County in
which all of the Assessment District is located, a certified copy of this resolution of
abandonment. The certificate of the City Clerk attached to such copy shall include a reference
to the date of the adoption of this resolution of abandonment, the date of the Resolution of
Intention and date and recording data of the Boundary Map, all as herein provided. @e
Recorder shall index the resolution of abandonment in the book containing the index of the
Rcsos/102
Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts.
5. Effective D= This resolution of abandonment shall take effect upon the date of
its adoption by this Council.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
A@T:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resoa/ 1 02 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSI]DE) ss
CITY OF TEMIECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
FOR
RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT
Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the undersigned
City Clerk of the above City hereby certifies that the foregoing is a full and correct copy of the
Resolution of Abandonment of Special Assessment Proceedings adopted by the Council of the
City on April 23, 1996 in the Proceedings for the Assessment District for which the Boundary
Map was recorded, all as specified in the within Resolution of Abandonment of Special
Assessment Proceedings and to which reference is hereby made for all particulars.
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Resos/102 3
ITEI\4 24
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINAN"-,
CITY MANAGER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Agency Members
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass Corridor - Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority
RECOMMENDATION:That the Redevelopment Agency adopt the following resolution.
1 .Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD
TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
BACKGROUND: The City and the Redevelopment Agency have entered into a joint
exercise of powers agreement creating the Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority (the
"Improvement Authority"), in order to accommodate a proposed financing structure for
public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and for the Western Bypass Corridor.
The proposed structure for the financing has been simplified, and the Improvement
Authority is no longer required to assist in financing.
The Improvement Authority has not, to date, entered into any contracts or issued or
incurred any debt. Agency Staff now recommends that the Agency move to terminate the
Improvement Authority, subject to adoption by the City Council of a resolution also
terminating the Improvement Authority, in order to avoid the incurrence of any future
administrative costs in respect to the Improvement Authority. If it is ever needed in the
future, the Improvement Authority can be reestablished by execution of a new joint exercise
of powers agreement by the City and the Agency when such a need arises.
Attachments:Resolution
Joint Community Facilities Agreement
R:INORTONLIAGENDASIFINRDA.AGN 04116196
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula (the "Agency") are parties to the Old TownAVestside Improvement Authority
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the "Agreement") creating the Old Town/Westside
Improvement Authority (the "Authority"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority has never entered into any contracts or issued any Bonds (as
defined in the Agreement) and the Governing Board of the Agency now desires to terminate the
Agreement and the Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
1. Termination of Aizreement and Auth@ The Agreement and the Authority are
terminated, subject to adoption by the City Council of the City of a resolution also terminating the
Agreement and the Authority.
2. Official Actions, The Chairperson, Executive Director, Secretary and all other officers
of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or
desirable hereunder with respect to the termination of the Agreement and the Authority, including
but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates or instruments which they,
or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this
resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Governing Board of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of
April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC/Agency Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIEFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. RDA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Governing
Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: AGENCYMEMBERS:
NOES: AGENCYMEMBERS:
ABSENT:AGENCYMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC/Agency
Secretary
RESOS. Rda 1 1
30043-01 JHHW:Pjr:cra 03/24/96 12128
JOINT COMMUNIT-Y FACILMES AGREEMENT
OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILMES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
CO FACIUTIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(OLDTOWNAREAPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS)
This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of April 9,1996,
is by and between the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
(the "Authority") and the City of Temecula (the "Participating Agency").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority has undertaken proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside
Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old
Town Area Public Improvements) (the "CFD"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title
5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code, and to issue bonds of the
Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") under the Act in order to finance various public
improvements necessitated by the development of the Old Town Area of the City of Temecula
and otherwise to finance improvement to the Western Bypass in the City (collectively, the
"Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project includes the construction of the public improvements described
in Exhibit A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Exhibit is, by this reference, incorporated
herein; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire that the Participating Agency own and operate the
Improvements upon their completion if they comply with the standards and are completed to
the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and
WHEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint
community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the
Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which
Improvements are to be financed, in part, with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon
completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and
WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this
Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their
understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds and the Improvements, all as more
particularly set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth
below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. The Authority will reserve a portion of the
proceeds of the Bonds in an amount necessary to finance the costs incurred in connection with
the acquisition and construction of the Improvements. Said amount, together with any
investment earnings thereon, shall be held in the Improvement Fund established for the CFD (the
"Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amount shall in no
way be pledged as security for the Bonds. The amount necessary for the acquisition and
construction of the Improvements is currently estimated to be in excess of $15,000,000.
Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no
obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any
costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements.
Section 2. Construction of Improvements. The Authority shall cause the Improvements
to be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency.
All construction shall be done by independent contractors, and neither the Participating Agency
nor the Authority shall have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in
connection therewith; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the
Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities other than the Authority in
respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements.
Section 3. Inspection and Acceptance; Use of Bond Funds. The Participating Agency
shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance
with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion
of such construction to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency
shall accept dedication of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures, and
shall accept ownership, and responsibility of operation, of the Improvements. The Participating
Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the
Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the
Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any
of the Improvements.
Following the acceptance by the Participating Agency of the Improvements, the
Authority shall disburse the proceeds of the Bonds described in Section 1 above to pay or
reimburse payment of the costs thereof. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Authority
may disburse such amounts to pay costs of construction of the Improvements prior to
completion of all of the Improvements, if it determines that such disbursement is permissible
under the Act and will reduce the overall costs of construction of the Improvements.
Section 4. Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to
this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund and
identified in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in
any event be personally liable hereunder.
The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder shall be to inspect and accept
the Improvements as described in Section 3 above. The Participating Agency shall have no
responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to
their acceptance by the Participating Agency. If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform
any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the conunencement of
an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such
obligations.
Section 5. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the Bonds are not issued by
December 31, 1996. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement
shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements-by the
Participating Agency, and disbursement from the Improvement Fund of the amount described
in Section I above by the Authority to pay or reimburse a portion of the total costs of the
Improvements.
2
Section 6. No Obligation to Form CFD; Agreement of Benefit to Residents. The
provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, by their respective approvals of this Agreement, the Authority
and the Participating Agency have each declared and hereby confirm that this Agreement is
beneficial to the residents of their respective. entities in assuring the provision of financing for a
portion of the costs of the Improvements in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Section 7. Partial Invali@t . If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be
given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole
benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no
other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein.
Section 9. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year written alongside their signature below.
CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Participating
Agency")
Date of Execution: April _, 1996
By:
City Manager
Attest:
City Clerk
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY (the "Authority")
Date of Execution: April . 1996
By:
Executive Director
Attest:
Secretary
,40043-0 l:j2 128
3
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEN4ENTS
The public improvements described herein shall include the land acquisition, design and construction
of the facilities and shall include all associated and incidental facilities which may or may not be
specifically identified in the description unless specifically noted otherwise.
OLD TOWN STREET IMEPROVEMIENTS - FIRST ST. ROAD AND BRIDGE
Facilities for Street Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula:
Provide a 78 foot wide street right-of-way, 58 feet of roadway pavement in First
Street from the Western Bypass Corridor to Front Street including a bridge over
Murrietta Creek and traffic signalization at the intersection of Front Street. Provide
new intersection configuration at Front St., First St. and Santiago Rd.
Preliminary and final design of facilities shall be by the City of Temecula and the
design shall be provided to the Community Facilities District ('CFD') without
additional charge. 'Me design and construction of the utilities as may be required by
various utility companies to provide the required services to the proposed Westside
development are addressed elsewhere in this Exhibit.
City of Temecula shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for all the permits
including the City of Temecula, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California
Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Department of Fish and Wild Life, Riverside
County Flood Control and any other permits and approvals as may be required, and
the CFD shall reimburse the City for the costs of all permits and environmental
studies.
City of Temecula shall acquire afl necessary right of way and shall relocate as
required businesses, tenants and property owners. The CFD shah reimburse the City
for actual costs of the land and relocations, including the costs of third party contracts
for consultants for land acquisition and relocation.
2. OLD TOWN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING PROJECT
Facilities for Gateway Landscaping Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula:
Provide design and construction of the Old Town Gateway Landscaping improvements
as approved by the City. Design shall include trees and other landscaping along the
Westside of Front St. between Front St. and (Murrie= Creek) and Rancho California
Rd. to the Post Office. Street tree placement shall be in conformance with the Old
Town Specific Plan.
'ne City shall acquire the necessary right of way and the CFD shall reimburse the
City for the actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party contracts. -for
consultants for land acquisition and relocation.
Submit the Landscape Plan to the Planning Department for review and approval.
A-i
Construct and install the landscaping in accordance with the Landscape Plan and scope
of work as approved. 7le scope of work shall be the design and design
administration of improvements and construction and construction administration of
the approved design. The approved design shall be such that the entire cost of design,
construction, administration and all other associated project costs, as approved the
City, do not exceed $83,500. There shall be no obligation to perform any of the
scope herein which would result in charges in excess thereof, absent mutual agreement
of the parties to increase said allowance.
3. OLD TOWN DEMONSTRATION BLOCK ETSCAIPE)
Facilities for Streetscape and Landscaping Improvements, including the Front St. Repairs and
Upgrades, Front St. Reconstruction and Miscellaneous Street Improvements, as approved by the City
of Temecula:
Provide design and construction of improvements to existing Old Town public areas,
particularly the area of the intersection of Front St. and Main St. Improvements shall
include paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, lighting, street
furniture and other upgrades as approved by the City.
Scope of work shall be the design, design administration, construction and
construction administration of improvements to an area as designated by the City.
The Design scope approved for construction shall be such that the entire cost of
design, construction and administration, construction management and all other
associated project costs, as approved by the City, do not exceed $698,000. There
shall be no obligation to perform any portion of the scope herein which would result
in charges in excess thereof, absent mutual agreement of the parties to increase said
allowance.
Provide a conceptual design and submit to Planning Department for review and
approval for the following:
i.Landscaping and Lighting.
ii.Public signage, including Gateway entry sian, directional signs and street
name pole signs
iii.Street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk (boardwalk), paving,
street lighting with sound system, street furniture to include wood benches,
phone booths, trash receptacles, newspaper racks, mailboxes, bus shelters and
drinking fountains, all in general conformance with the Old Town Specific
Plan and Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Prepare the necessary plans, specifications and a detailed cost estimate for the
approved scope of work and submit for review by the City.
Construct the facilities as per approved plans and scope of work.
Design shall be provided to facilitate the final design and to eliminate potential future
drainage problems.
A-2
4. OIJ) TOWN STORM DRAIN IM[PROVEMENTS
Facilities for Storm Drain Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula and Riverside County
Flood Control District, if required:
Design and r-onstruc t a Storm Drain System in Third Street with adequate capacity to
drain a portion of residential development east of Interstate 15 (one pick-up point), a
portion of the Interstate 15 slope and tributary areas at Mercedes Street and Front
Street.
Design and construct a Storm Drain System in Sixth Street with adequate capacity to
drain a portion of residential development east of Interstate 15 (two pick-up points,
one in Fourth St. and the other in Sixth St.), a portion of the Interstate 15 slope and
tributary areas at Mercedes Street and Front Street.
Both storm drain systems will outlet into Murrietta Creek. Provide the necessary
facilities alone, the systems to accept local drainage.
Obtain all necessary permits for the installation of the improvements. Construct the
improvements in accordance with the approvals of the City of Temecula and Riverside
County Flood Control District ("RCFCD'), if required.
The City of Temecula shall obtain any right of way necessary to construct the
improvements and the CFD shall reimburse the City for actual land costs, including
the costs of third party contracts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation.
Reference attached Exhibit 1 dated March 5, 1996.
5 OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS - WESTERN BYPASS
Facilities for Street Improvements as approved by the City of Temecula:
Western Bypass Corridor - Provide an 88 foot wide street right-of-way, 33 feet of
roadway pavement on each side of a 12 foot median, from SR79/1-15 northerly to
Vincent Moraga Drive including a bridge over Murrietta Creek and traffic
signalization at the intersection of Front Street. Extend Front St. approximately 100
feet to the new intersection with the Western Bypass.
City of Temecula shall design facilities and shall be reimbursed for the cost of the
design for the portion constructed by the CFD.
City of Temecula shall acquire all necessary right of way and the CFD shall
reimburse the City for actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party
contracts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation.
A-3
Vincent MoraLya Drivt - Provide a 78 foot wide street right-of-way, 58 feet of
roadway pavement from the Western Bypass Corridor easterly past Ridge Park Drive,
joinine, existing Vincent Moraga Drive. Provide a "Tee' intersection with Ridge
Park. Also provide traffic signalization at the intersection of Vincent Moraga Drive
and Rancho California Road.
City of Temecula shall design facilities and shall be reimbursed for the cost of the
design for the portion constructed by the CFD.
City of Temecula shall acquire all necessary right of way and the CFD shall
reimburse the City for actual costs of the land, including the costs of third party
contra:Ts for consultants for land acquisition and relocation.
6 WESTERN BYPASS NORTH OF VINCENT MORAGA
Facilities for the following shall be as approved by the City of Temecula. In the event the City is
able to amend the EIR to permit the timely bidding and construction of the Western Bypass north of
Vincent Moraca, the following shall be provided:
Project shall cut and fill the roadbed for the Western Bypass between Vincent Moraga
and Rancho California Rd. using excess material from the construction of the Western
Bypass south of Vincent Moraga, First St. and the hotel/arena site. 'Me costs of this
effort shall be bome by the CFD as a part of the guaranteed construction effort. The
design of the roadbed shall be by the City and the project shall not be required to
reimburse the City for this portion of the design. The project shall reimburse the City
for costs to acquire right of way for the Northern section regardless of whether or not
the EIR is amended.
7le project shall provide drainage facilities, landscaping, erosion control and all other
requirements to provide the cut and fill for the Northern section. 'ne City of
Temecula shall reimburse the project, as costs are incurred, for the actual costs of
these requirements, including but not limited to all administration, management,
inspection, testing, overhead and reasonable fees as defined in the Construction
Agreement.
The City shall accept all responsibility for maintenance of the improvements upon
completion of the work.
In the event the City is unable to amend the EIR, the project shall either permanently
build up the residential area south of First St. and east of the Western Bypass or shall
stockpile the material on a vacant parcel north.of Vincent Moraga. The City shall
take all responsibility to maintain 'm its natural condition the stockpiled material until
used to fill the Northern half of the Western Bypass. In the event construction of the
Northern half of the Western Bypass does not commence within 5 years of the
completion of the portion south of Vincent Moraga the City shall cause the stockpiled
material to be removed in order to return the site to the original condition.
A-4
7. OTHER PROJECTS SHOULD ADDMONAL FUNDS BE AVAILABLE
Facilities for the following shall be approved by the City of Temecula or appropriate entity:
Main St. pedestrian.link from the Old Town project to the Westside Hotel/Arena site.
Dr)- utilities such as electrical (both primary service routing existing underground),
-as, telephone and cable (both new and routing underground).
A-5
7 cfa
)OROPOSED 240
STORM IDR
PROP!! 2le
STORM DRAIN
PRO
DP.AIN 3V
E:XLST. 24
PROPOSED 360
STORM D@
EXMT.
VORM DRAIN
b iLoLcc.%.i
$TUO-1
k L%l ri $Lt c, w 94 A lkta
STORM DRAIN EXHIBIT Volvo
A-6
ITEI\4 25
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANOE
CITY MANAGER
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Authority Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
hold the election called pursuant to the resolution listed as 5. below, declare the results of the
election, and have the first reading of the ordinance described below.
1 .Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS,
ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY
OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF BUSINESS
AND RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS
2.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF
ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM OLD
TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2
(WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
That the Board of Directors adopt the resolutions described below,
R.,INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN CL4116196
3.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF THE OLD TOWN/
WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD
TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE
LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT,
PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL
TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT
4.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO
INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD
TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND
SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF
THE DISTRICT
5.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION
6.Hold a special election of the landowners in the proposed Community
Facilities District No. 1.
7.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL
ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF
SPECIAL TAX LIEN
R.,INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN 04116196
8.Have the first reading of an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN
THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
BACKGROUND:
The Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers
agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the financing of
public improvements in the Old Town area of the City and the Western Bypass Corridor.
Staff recommends that the Authority adopt a resolution as to certain housekeeping matters
relative to the Authority, including the setting of a date for an annual meeting place, the
rules of proceedings for meetings, etc.
The original financing structure proposed for the Old Town area public improvements and
the Western Bypass Corridor contemplated the use of two separate community facilities
districts. The financing structure has been simplified, and the facilities to be financed by
the proposed CFD No. 2 has been included within the authorized facilities for CFD No. 1, so
that CFD No. 2 is no longer necessary. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the
proceedings for CFD No. 2 be abandoned.
On March 26, 1 996, the Authority held concurrent public hearings on the establishment of
CFD No. 1, the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 1 and the issuance of bonds for CFD No. 1,
as required by the California Government Code. The proponent of CFD No. 1, T.Z.B.G.,
Inc., has requested that the Authority now take the actions necessary to officially form CFD
No. 1, to authorize the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 1 and to authorize the incurrence of
bonded indebtedness by CFD No. 1. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt resolutions
of formation and of necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, and calling a special election of
the landowners in the area of CFD No. 1.
Ballots for the election have already been mailed to the eligible landowner voters, and have
been returned to the City Clerk. The eligible voters include all landowners within the
boundaries of the CFD No. 1, as such boundaries are indicated on a third amended boundary
map for CFD No. 1 on file with the Authority Secretary. At the request of T.Z.B.G., Inc., a
significant amount of land previously proposed to be included in CFD No. 1, as indicated on
the second amended boundary map for CFD No. 1, has been dropped from CFD No. 1, and
will not be subject to the levy of special taxes.
If the eligible landowner voters approve the ballot measure by more than two-thirds of the
votes cast, the Authority will be able to levy special taxes solely on land located in CFD No.
1 and then only if such land has been conveyed to T.Z.B.G., Inc. Or BFD/OTEP durin ' g the
one-year period following April 23, 1996. By law, the landowners are given one vote for
each acre of land or portion thereof that they own within the boundaries of CFD No. 1. The
City Clerk, as Secretary of the Authority, will be requested to canvass the election
immediately after adoption of the resolution calling the election.
R.'INORTONL IFINCFD.A GN 04116196
if two-thirds or more of the votes cast are in favor of CFD No. 1, the Authority is then
requested to adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election and providing for the
recording of a notice of special tax lien with the County Recorder. The notice provides all
future property owners with knowledge of the existence of the Authority's special taxing
powers. The Authority is then requested to have the first reading of an ordinance levying
special taxes.
The ordinance permits special taxes to be levied only on property located in CFD No. 1, and
then only after title to the property has been conveyed to T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP. It is
expected that special taxes will be levied to pay debt service on bonds proposed to be
issued for CFD No. 1. Staff expects that a resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds
and approving the related legal documents will be presented to the Authority for approval
sometime next month.
Attachments:Resolutions (6)
Ordinance
Notice of Special Tax Lien
R:INORTONLIFINCFD.AGN 04116196
RESOLUTTON NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTTON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTS]IDE CO FACIELMEES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY REGARDING MEEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR
THE AUTHORITY, D@TING THE G OF A NOTICE OF
FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND
ESTABLISBIING THE ORDER OF BUS@S AND RULES FOR ITS
PROCEEDINGS
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the 'City') and the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula (the 'Agency') have adopted resolutions authorizing the formation of a joint
powers authority under Articles 1-4 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5, Division
7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to be known as the 'Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority' (the 'Authority'), and the
execution of a joint exercise of powers agreement in connection therewith; and
AS, the City and the Agency have executed said agreement and the Authority,
being duly formed, now desires to take certain actions relative to its administration as set forth
below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
Section 1. Regular Meetings. The regular meetings of the Board of Directors of the
Authority shall hereafter be held annually on the first Tuesday of July at the hour of 7:00
o'clock p.m. If any regular meeting falls on a holiday, such regular meeting shall be held on
the next Tuesday which is a business day at the same hour.
Section 2. Sp=ial MeetinLs. The Chairperson of the Authority may, when it is
deemed expedient, and shall, upon the written request of two (2) Boardmembers of the
Authority, call a special meeting of the Authority for the purpose of transacting the business
designated in the call. At such special meeting, no business shall be considered other than as
designated in the call.
Section 3. PostinL, ALyendas/Notices. The Secretary or her authorized representative
shall post an agenda for each regular Authority meeting or a notice for each special Authority
meeting containing a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at
the meeting together with the time and location of the meeting. Agendas/notices shall be
posted in the same place or places as agendas are posted for meetings of the City Council of
the City at least 72 hours in advance of each regular meeting and at least 24 hours in advance
of each special meeting. The Secretary shall maintain a record of such posting.
Resos.FA\004
Section 4. MeetinL, Place. All meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at the
regular meeting place of the City Council of the City, unless the Board of Directors shall
adjourn to or fix another place of meeting in a notice to be given thereof, or unless prevented
by flood, fire or other disaster. Said regular meeting place is hereby fixed and established at
the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Section 5. Rules of Proceedings.
(a) Public Meetings: All legislative sessions of the Board of Directors,
whether regular or special, shall be open to the public. At every regular meeting, members of
the public shall have an opportunity to address the Authority on matters within the Authority's
subject matterjurisdiction. Public input and comment on matters on the agenda shall be heard
when the matter regularly comes up on the agenda. Public input and comment on matters not
otherwise on the agenda shall be made during the 'open time for public urgency matters.' The
Chairperson or presiding officer may limit the total amount of time allocated for public
discussion by particular issues and/or the time allocated for each individual speaker.
(b) Quorum: Three (3) of the members of the Board of Directors shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
(c) Method of Action: The Board of Directors shall act only by ordinance,
resolution or motion, which, to become effective, shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of
not less than a majority of the members of the Board of Directors present and voting.
(d) Manner of Voting. Voting on formal resolutions, matters as to any
federal, state, county or city agency, and on such other matters as may be requested by a
majority of the Boardmembers, shall be by roll call or call vote, and the ayes, noes and
members present not voting shall be entered upon the minutes of such meeting, except on the
election of officers, which may be by ballot.
(e) Adjournment: The Board of Directors may adjourn any regular,
adjourned regular, special or adjourned special meeting to a time and place specified in the
order of adjournment. Less than a quorum may so adjourn from time to time. If all members
are absent from any regular or adjourned regular meeting the Secretary may declare the
meeting adjourned to a stated time and place and shall cause a written notice of the
adjournment to be given in the same manner as provided for special meetings, unless such
notice is waived as provided for special meetings. A copy of the order or notice of
adjournment shall be conspicuously posted on or near the door of the place where the regular,
adjourned regular, special or adjourned special meeting was held within 24 hours after the time
of the adjournment. When a regular or adjourned regular meeting is adjourned as herein
provided, the resulting adjourned regular meeting is a regular meeting for all purposes. When
an order of adjournment of any meeting fails to state the hour at which the adjourned meeting
is to be held, it shall be held at the hour specified for regular meetings.
Resoo.FA\004 2
(f) Hearings - Continuance: Any hearing being held, or notice or ordered to
be held, by the Board of Directors at any meeting may by order or notice of continuance be
continued or re-continued to any subsequent meeting of the Board of Directors in the same
manner and to the same extent set forth for the adjournment of meetings; provided, that if the
hearing is continued to a time less than 24 hours after the time specified in the order of notice
of hearing, a copy of the order or notice of continuance of hearing shall be posted immediately
following the meeting at which the order of declaration of continuance was adopted or made.
Section 6. Contracts o Agreements. All contracts or agreements on behalf of the
Authority shall be signed by the Chairperson or the Executive Director, and countersigned by
the Secretary, after having been authorized to do so by action of the Board of Directors, unless
otherwise specifically provided by resolution of the Board of Directors. Any contract or
agreement involving less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) may be executed by any of such
officers without the need for any approval by the Board of Directors.
Section 7. @. The Authority shall have an Official Seal consisting of two (2)
concentric circles with the words 'Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority' within the outer circle and 'September 12, 1995', the date of formation
of the Authority, within the inner circle. The Secretary shall obtain the Seal at the Authority's
expense and shall have custody of the Seal.
Section 8. Secretary of Statc. Bond Counsel to the Authority is hereby directed to file a
notice of the formation of the Authority with the Secretary of State of the State of California,
as required by Sections 6503.5 and 53051 of the California Government Code.
Section 9. Office and Mailing AddL=. The office of the Authority and its official
mailing address are hereby fixed and established at Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority c/o City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590, Attention: Executive Director.
Resot.FA\004 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk
Authority Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT:BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
4
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY
FACH, DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHOP-,ITY OF
ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE CO TY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC P"ROVEMIENTS)
VMEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions of
intention to establish the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) ('CFD
2") and to incur bonded indebtedness of the proposed CFD 2; and
@EREAS, on September 20, 1995, a map of the boundaries of the proposed CFD 2
was recorded in Book 40 at Page I of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts
in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, and on October 23, 1995, a
first amended map of the boundaries of the proposed CFD 2 was recorded in Book 40 at Page
62 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts in the office of the County
Recorder for the County of Riverside; and
VMER]EAS, this Board of Directors now desires to abandon the proceedings to form
CFD 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1.The proceedings to form CFD 2 are hereby abandoned.
2.The Secretary is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution with
the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, including the Certificate of the
Secretary attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Resos.FA/02
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
Secretary/City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
Resos.FA/02 2
EXHIBIT A
Recording Requested by and
When Recorded Retum to:
Secretary
okj Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority
c/o City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA. 92590
CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY
OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSI]DE COMMUNITY FAC]IL
DISTRICT NNANCING AUTHORITY
The undersigned Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority hereby certifies as follows:
1. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution of abandonment of
proceedings to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) ('CFD
2"), which was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') on April 23, 1996; and
2. The original resolution of intention to establish CFD 2 was adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Authority on September 12, 1995; and
3. The map of the proposed boundaries of CFD 2 was filed with the County Recorder
of the County of Riverside on September 20, 1995, and was recorded by said County Recorder
in Book 40 at Page 1 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, and a first
amended map of the proposed boundaries of CFD 2 was filed with the County Recorder of the
County of Riverside on October 23, 1995, and was recorded by said County Recorder in Book
40 at Page 62 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts; and
4. Pursuant to Section 3117 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the County
Recorder of the County of Riverside shall index the attached Resolution of Abandonment in
the book containing the index of the maps of assessment and community facilities districts.
Resoa.FA/02 3
Dated: April 1996 By:
Secretary, Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
On before me, Notary Public, personally
appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis
of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
S my hand and official seal.
Resos.FA/02 4
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT F3NAN(
AUTUORffY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE
COFAC DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
COTY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLID TOWN AREA
PUBLIC U%lPROVEMENTS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX WRMIN THE DISTRICT, PREL@ARI]LY
ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LEMT FOR THE DISTRICT
AND SUBAUTTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LINUT TO THE
QUALMM ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a
resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside
Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community
Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to
form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), pursuant to
the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'); and
VMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December
12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution making findings as to the complexity of
the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of
Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of
Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional
territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the
District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District
and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolution, as adopted
by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Amending Resolution');
and
%MEREAS, the Resolution of Intention, the resolution adopted on October 10, 1995
described above and the Amending Resolution, incorporating maps of the proposed
boundaries of the District and stating the facilities to be financed, the cost of providing
such facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied
within the District to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with
respect to District, are on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are.,
incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set fo@ herein; and
Resos.FA/03
MMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing
as required by the Act, the Resolution of Intention and the Amending Resolution, as
applicable, relative to the proposed formation of the District; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters
pertaining to the formation of the District, the facilities to be provided therein and the levy
said special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and
VMEREAS, at said hearing evidence was presented to this Board of Directors on said
matters before it, including a report (the 'Report') as to facilities to be provided through the
District and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of
Directors at the conclusion of said hearing was fully advised with respect to the premises; and
"EREAS, this Board of Directors desires to delete certain territory from the
proposed boundaries of the District, and to approve the revised boundaries of the District as
said boundaries are indicated on the third amended map of the boundaries of the District on
file with the Secretary and approved as set forth below; and
VMEREAS, written protests with respect to the formation of the District, the
furnishing of specified types of facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the
special taxes have not been filed with the Secretary by fifty percent (50%) or more of the
registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (1/2) or
more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and
WHEREAS, the special tax proposed to be levied in the District to pay for the
proposed facilities to be provided thereby, has been revised following the public hearing to
lower the maximum special taxes that may be levied in the District and now is as set forth in
Exhibit A hereto, and said special tax has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent
(50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the
owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the
special tax; and
RMEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to form the District and call for an
election thereon as provided by the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2.The proposed special tax to be levied within the District has not been precluded by
majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act.
Resoa.FA/03 2
3. AU prior proceedings taken by this Board of Directors in connection with the
establishment of the District and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are
hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act. On September 12,
1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution adopting Local Goals and Policies for
Community Facilities Districts of the Authority, and this Board of Directors hereby finds and
determines that formation of the District and the authorization to levy special taxes and the
proposed rates and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District are in conformity
with said goals and policies.
The Joint Community Facilities Agreements between the Authority and the City of
Temecula, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Eastern
Municipal Water District and the Rancho California Water District, as authorized by Section 4
of the Resolution of Intention, and heretofore executed by the Executive Director and by the
Secretary of the Authority, are hereby ratified and confirmed. The Executive Director is
hereby authorized and directed to negotiate (if applicable), with the assistance of Authority
Counsel, Bond Counsel and the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula, and to
execute and deliver, all certificates, documents and agreements referenced in or otherwise
necessary to carry out the obligations of the Authority under said agreements.
4. The community facilities district designated 'Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area
Public Improvements)' is hereby established pursuant to the Act.
5. The boundaries of the District, as set forth in the third amended map of the District
on file with the Secretary, are hereby approved, are incorporated herein by reference and shall
be the boundaries of the District. The Secretary is hereby directed to record, or cause to be
recorded, said third amended map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County
Recorder of the County of Riverside as soon as practicable, but in any event no more than
fifteen days after the adoption of this Resolution.
6. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant to
the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A attached to the Resolution
of Intention and those facilities described in Section 3 of the Amending Resolution
(collectively, the 'Facilities'), which Exhibit and description are by this reference incorporated
herein.
7. Except where funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities,
the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to finance the
Facilities and/or the costs of the Authority, the District and the City of Temecula to administer
the District and such bonds, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by
recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property and/or interests therein in
the District, will be annually levied within the District, and collected in the same mann - er as
ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors may
Resoit.FA/03 3
direct, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The rate and method of
apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property and the interests therein
within the District, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the District to estimate
the probable maximum amount such owner will have to pay, is set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
As permitted by Section 53340 of the Act, the Board of Directors of the Authority
hereby authorizes: (a) the special tax to be collected by direct billing of the property owners
when required or otherwise determined by the Treasurer of the Authority as necessary to meet
the financial obligations of the District, (b) any property subject to delinquent special taxes to
be sold at foreclosure sale at a price determined, consistent with any requirements of the Act,
as provided in the fiscal agent agreement providing for the terms of any bonds issued for the
District, and (c) a representative of the owners of such bonds to bid at any such foreclosure
sale in the amount of the delinquent special taxes plus any penalties, interest and applicable
foreclosure costs; and to take title to the delinquent property of the highest bidder, without any
requirement for the payment of monies by such representative or the Bondowners; all as
further provided and directed in the fiscal agent agreement providing for the terms of any
bonds issued for the District the payment of which is to be made from the proceeds of such
special taxes.
8. It is hereby found and determined that the Facilities are necessary to .-. @---.t increased
demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development or rehabilitation occurring in
the District.
9. The Treasurer of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909)
694-6444, is the officer of the Authority which will be responsible for preparing annually a
current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be
responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act.
10. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the
California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax
shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the District and this lien shall continue in force
and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien
canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the Board of Directors of the
Authority ceases.
1 1. In accordance with Section 53325.7 of the Act, the annual appropriations limit, as
defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the
District is hereby preliminarily established at $27,500,000 and said appropriations limit shall
be submitted to the voters of the District as hereafter provided. The proposition establishing
said annual appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors
voting thereon and shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Resoa.FA/03 4
Section 53325.7 of the Act.
12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax
and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be
submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election, the time, place and conditions
of which shall be as specified by a separate resolution of the Board of Directors.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO , by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
A=T:
June S. Greek, CMC
Secretary, City Clerk
Resoa.FA/03
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary, City Clerk
Resot.FA/03 6
EXHI]BIT A
RATE AND MIETHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY FACIIL DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORrff
Commu nity Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area
Public Improvements) (the 'District'), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability
determined by the Responsible Party of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority (the 'Authority') through the application of the following procedures. AU
of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions
of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in
the manner provided below.
It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at
the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied win be
subject to the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is
provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect
thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times
or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District.
MAX SPECIAL TAX
ZONE A
The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 on any
Parcel, designated as Zone A on the map shown herein as Exhibit 1, shall not exceed the sum
of:
(i)The maximum building special tax rate of $17.00 per building square foot,
multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the
Parcel;
plus
(ii)The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied
times the Land Area of the Parcel.
Resoa.FA/03 7
ZONE B
The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 on any
Parcel, designated as Zone B on the map shown herein as Exhibit I, shall not exceed the sum
of-
(i)The maximum building special tax rate of $17.00 per building square foot,
multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the
Parcel;
plus
(ii)The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied
times the Land Area of the Parcel.
The special tax for Zone A and Zone B shall be levied annually. The maximum building
special tax and the maximum land special tax for Zone A and Zone B shall increase each
Fiscal Year from the maximum special tax for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 by 2%,
compounded annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than
40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential
purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government
Code.
ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGOREES; LEVY
ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES
On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the
special taxes on the County's secured tax roll, the Responsible Party shall determine for each
Parcel within the District, whether or not such parcel is Taxable Property, and whether such
Parcel is designated as Zone A or Zone B. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based
upon the records of the County Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1.
LEVY
The Responsible Party shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for
the FiscalYear commending such July 1, and levy on each Parcel which is Taxable Property,
as follows:
Step 1:Determine the Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable
Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then
Taxable Property in the District.
Step 2:Calculate the annual building tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 85 % of
Resos.FA/03 8
the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which
are then Taxable Property.
Step 3:Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is
Taxable Property by the lesser of-.
(i) the annual building tax rate;
or
(ii)the maximum building special tax rate for Zone A and Zone B,
respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1.
Step 4:Determine the Land Area for each Parcel of Taxable Property in the District
and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the
District.
Step 5:Calculate the annual land tax rate as the lessor of-
(i)(the sum of the Special Tax Liability less the total of the funds generated
for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property under Step 3 above),
divided by the total Land Area (by square footage) for all Parcels which
are then Taxable Property;
or
(ii)the maximum land special tax for Zone A and Zone B, respectfully, for
the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1.
Step 6:Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property by the annual
land tax rate determined under Step 5.
Step 7:Calculate the sum of the building tax (from Step 3) and the land tax (from Step
6)for each parcel which is Taxable Property.
PRIEPA S
Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A
particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be
issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual
special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Responsible Party in writing of such
intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the
prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. The following
must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel:
A.The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Respo sible
Party, as follows:
Resoz.FA/03 9
1.Compute the special tax for such Parcel by the total special tax for the then
current Fiscal Year.
2.The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel
by the total special tax for all properties for the then current Fiscal year within
the District, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any
outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand
dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with
prepayments of special tax for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the
total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount
shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000).
3.The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be
(a) increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on
the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Responsible Party to offset any
difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the
amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the
redemption of such bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Responsible Party
to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment;
and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment.
4.Determination of the total amount needed by the Responsible Party shall be
conclusive, absent manifest error.
B.The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any
payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not
relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become
due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded
against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until special
taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid.
DEFIMTIONS
Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the
Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority and
the City in carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not
limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of their
respective counsel, any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of special
taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and the City staff directly related
thereto, and a proportionate -mount of Authority and the City general administrative overhead
related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority or the City, respectively, from its own
funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the
Resos.FA/03 IC
Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their
respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the authority and the
City, in any way related to administration of the District.
Authority means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority.
Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance.
Building Floor Area means the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a
building, including each floor of multiple story buildings, exclusive of vent shafts and courts
(defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be
determined by the Responsible Party by reference to City or County approved building plans
or other such documentation as the Responsible Party shall determine.
City means the City of Temecula.
County means the County of Riverside.
Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the
Bonds during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized
interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent
Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments.
District means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements).
F'iscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
F-Lscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of
Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time.
FLscal Year means the period starting on July I and ending on the following June 30.
Und Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to
the nearest whole integer.
Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of
the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County.
Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of
Bonds.
Resoa.FA/03
Responsible Par-ty is any person or persons who the Authority may appoint from time to time
to compute the levy of the special taxes within the District.
Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such
Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as
determined by the Responsible party, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in
such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year
and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments
required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the
Bonds and any supplements thereto.
Taxable Proper-ty shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District that is
owned in fee by T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP, a California corporation, at any time between
the adoption of the resolution of formation for the District and the date that is one year after
the adoption of the resolution of formation, provided however, that the following property
shall be exempt from the special tax (i) any real property that is exempt from taxation by law,
(ii) any acres of land owned, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to and accepted
by a public agency, including but not limited to, the federal government, the State of
California and any local governmental agency, and (iii) land which is a public right-of-way or
which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the
purpose set forth in the easement.
Zone A is designated as those Parcels within the boundaries of the District that are not in Zone
B, as shown on the map designated Exhibit 1 herein.
Zone B is designated as those Parcels within the boundaries of the District, as shown on the
map designated Exhibit 1 herein.
Resoa.FA/03 12
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSH)E COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY DET G THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC
@ROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE
QUALIFI]ED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT
VMEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the
OldTown/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority')
adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a
Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to
the Mello-Roos Act if 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention') stating its intention to form the
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District'), pursuant to the Mello-
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'); and
RUEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution
entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the
Proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Pursuant to the Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness')
stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the District for the
purpose of financing certain costs of the facilities specified in the Resolution of Intention; and
VMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
amending the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness to
add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted
a resolution making findings as to the complexity of the proposed District, and on February
13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of
Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness to add additional territory to the
proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to
approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to
increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolution, as adopted by this
Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Amending Resolution"); and
VMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public
Resos.FA/01
hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of
the District, the financing of facilities by the District and the rate and method of
apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and
interest on the proposed indebtedness and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and
the District related to the administration of the District; and
VMEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining
to the formation of the District, the provision of said facilities (the 'Facilities') and the levy of
the special tax on property within the District were heard and a full and fair hearing was held;
and
VMEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area
Public Improvements), Authorizing The Levy Of A Special Tax Within The District,
Preliminarily Establishing An Appropriations Limit For The District And Submitting Levy Of
The Special Tax And The Establishment of The Appropriations Limit To The Qualified
Electors Of The District' (the 'Resolution of Formation'); and
VMEREAS, on March 26, 1996, this Board of Directors held a noticed public
hearing as required by the Act relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the
Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness, as amended by the Amending Resolution; and
VMEREAS, no written protests by land owners within or eligible voters of the District
with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to
Incur Indebtedness, as amended by the Amending Resolution, have been filed with the
Secretary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2.This Board of Directors deems it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness in the
maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000 within the boundaries of the District.
3. The indebtedness is to be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the
Facilities, as provided in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending Resolution,
and the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling
bonds to finance the Facilities and the costs of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the
District related to the administration of the District.
Resos.FA/01 2
4. The whole of the District shall pay for the bonded indebtedness through the levy of
the special tax. The tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the formula set forth in
Exhibit 'A' to the Resolution of Formation.
5. The maximum amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred is $27,500,000 and
the maximum term of the bonds to be issued shall in no event exceed forty (40) years.
6. The bonds shall bear interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest
rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable semiannually or in
such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or
rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by this Board of Directors or its
designee at the time or times of sale of said bonds.
7. The proposition of incurring the bonded indebtedness herein authorized shall be
submitted to the qualified electors of the District and shall be consolidated with elections on
the proposition of levying special taxes within the District and the establishment of an
appropriations limit for the District pursuant to Section 53353.5 of the Act. The time, place
and conditions of said election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this Board of
Directors.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATREST:
June S. Greek, CMC
Secretary/City Clerk
Resoo.FA/01 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED- BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
Resoa.FA/01 4
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION
AS, on this date, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority") adopted a resolution entitled 'A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements),
Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an
Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the
Establiihment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District' (the
"Resolution of Formation"), ordering the formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements) (the "District'), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the District
and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District;
WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled 'A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District
No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors
of the District" (the "Resolution to Incur Indebtedness'), determining the necessity to incur bonded
indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000 upon the security of said
special tax to be levied within the District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of said resolutions, the propositions of the levy
of said special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded
indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District as required by the Mello-
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act').
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1 . Pursuant to Sections 53326, 53351 and 53325.7 of the Act, the issues of the levy
of said special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of said
appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election called
therefor as provided below.
R:INORTOAEL4GEAVASU?ESOSISPECEF-ECRES 04112196
2. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the three propositions described in
paragraph I above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein. Said form of ballot is hereby
approved.
3. This Board of Directors hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been
registered to vote within the territory of the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the
close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Board of Directors for the
purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Board
of Directors finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners,
within the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners or their authorized
representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the
District as of the close of said public hearings.
4. This Board of Directors hereby calls a special election to consider the measures
described in paragraph 2 above, which election shall be held in the meeting room of this Board
of Directors immediately following adoption of this Resolution. The Secretary of the Authority
is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the
Secretary has on file the Resolution of Formation, a certified third amended boundary map of the
proposed boundaries of the District, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to
determine the boundaries of the District.
The voted ballots shall be returned to the Secretary prior to or immediately following the
adoption of this Resolution; and when all of the qualified voters have voted the election shall be
closed.
5. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail or
hand-delivered ballot pursuant to Section 4000 of the California Elections Code. This Board of
Directors hereby finds that paragraph (a), (b), (c) (1) and (c) (3) of said Section 4000 are
applicable to this special election.
6. This Board of Directors acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered
to each of the qualified electors of the District a ballot in the form set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto.
Each ballot indicates the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner to which it
pertains.
Each ballot was accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use
and return of the ballot. The envelope to be used to return the ballot was enclosed with the ballot,
had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the
landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of pe@ury, stating that the voter is the owner of record
or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name
appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of
signing and place of execution of the declaration described in clause (b) above, and (e) a notice
R:INORTONLL4GEArDASIRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196
that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board.
Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures are hereby waived, as provided
in Section 53327 of the Act, by reason of the waiver set forth in each of the voted ballots and as
otherwise permitted by the Act.
7.The Secretary shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the meeting room
of this Boardof Directors upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether said ballots
be personallydelivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available at said location
ballots which may be marked on the election day by said qualified electors.
8. This Board of Directors hereby further finds that the provisions of Section 53326
of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation
to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified electors of the District.
The voted ballots of the landowners within the District contain a waiver of the time limit
pertaining to the conduct of the election, and any requirement for analysis and arguments for the
ballot measure. Accordingly, this Board of Directors finds and determines that said qualified
electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and
have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Board of Directors also finds and
determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election.
9. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish in a newspaper of general circulation
circulating within the area of the District a copy of this Resolution and a copy of the Resolution
to Incur Indebtedness, as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
Secretary, City Clerk
R:INORTOAEL4GEIVDASIRESOS@SPECELECRES 04112196
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 96-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NAYS: BOARD MEMBERS;
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINIED: BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
R:VNORTONLIAGEJVDASIRESOSiSPECELECRES 04112196
EXHIBIT A
OLD TOWN/WESTS]IDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Community Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
OFFTCIAL BALLOT
SPECIAL TAX ELECTION
This ballot is for a special, landowner election. You must return this ballot, sealed in
the accompanying postage paid envelopoe to the City Clerk of the City of Temecula, acting as
the Secretary of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority.
Please return the executed ballot sealed in the accompanying envelope to the City Clerk as
soon as possible, but in any event so that it is received by the City Clerk by April 23, 1996.
You may mail the executed return envelope with the ballot sealed inside, or hand deliver it to
the City Clerk. The City Clerk's office is located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting line after the word 'YES", the word 'NO' or
after the word 'ABSTAIN". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing
marks are forbidden and make the ballot void.
If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk and obtain
another.
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the
maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to
exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of the sale of such bonds on
behalf of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District'),
the proceeds of which will be used to finance certain public improvements; shall a special tax
payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District
to pay for the public improvements, the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of
the Authority, the City of Temecula and the District in administering the District, and shall the
annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $27,500,000?
YES: NO: ABSTAIN:
By the execution in the space provided below, you also indicate your waiver of'any
time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for analysis and
arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by
Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the California Government Code.
R:INORTOArLL4GENDAStRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196
Number of Votes:
Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Numbers
of Property Owned:
Property Owners:
By:
R:INORTONLL4GENDASIRESOSISPECELECRES 04112196
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96- -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND
DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
V,iHERF,AS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") pursuant to
the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), this Board of
Directors on this date adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Calling Special Election',
calling for a special election of the qualified electors within the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area
Public Improvements) (the 'District'); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said resolution, which are by this reference
incorporated herein, said special election was held on this date, and the Secretary of the Authority
has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit 'A"; and
AS, this Board of Directors has reviewed said Canvass and hereby approves it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
I . The issues presented at said special election were the incurring of a bonded
indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, the levy of a special
tax within the District to be levied in accordance with the formula heretofore approved by this
Board of Directors by its resolution adopted this date entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of
Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area public
Improvements), Authorizing Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing
an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the
Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District', and the
approval of an annual appropriations limit of not to exceed $27,500,000 pursuant to said
resolution.
2. Pursuant to said Canvass on file with the Secretary of the Authority, the issues
presented at said special election were approved by the qualified electors of the District by more
than two-thirds of the votes cast at said special election.
R: @NORTONLL4 GEA7)ASLRESOSITAMEN. RES 04112196
3. Pursuant to said voter approval, the District is hereby declared to be fully formed
with theauthority to incur bonded indebtedness and to levy special taxes as heretofore provided
in theseproceedings and in the Act.
4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this Board of
Directors with respect to the District were valid and in conformity with the Act.
5.The Secretary of the Authority is hereby directed to execute and cause to be
recorded inthe office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a notice of special tax
lien in the form required by the Act.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
Secretary, City Clerk
R:WORTOAEL4 GENDASIRESOSITA)AJEN.RES 04112196
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. FA 96-- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NAYS: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
Authority Secretary/City Clerk
R: TNORTONL L4 GEAVA SIRESOSI TAXLJEN. RES 04112196
EXHI]BIT A
CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF SPECIAL ELECTION
Old Town/Westside Comimunity Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public improvements)
I hereby certify that on April 23, 1996, 1 canvassed the returns of the special election
held on April 23, 1996, in the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and the
total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes cast for and against
the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true
and correct:
Qualified
Landowner Votes
Votes Cast YES NO ABSTAIN
Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
Special Tax Election, April 23, 1996 189
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the
maximum aggregate principal amount of $27,500,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to
exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf
of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), the proceeds
of which will be used to finance certain public improvements; shall a special tax payable solely
from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the
public improvements, the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the
Authority, the City of Temecula and the District in administering the District, and shall the
annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $27,500,000?
R:INORTOAE L4 GEADA SIRESOSITAMEN. RES 04112196
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 23rd day of
April, 1996.
By:
Secretary,
Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority
R:tNORTOAILIAGEA7),4S[RESOSITAXUEN.RES 04112196
ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF D@TORS OF THE OID
TOWN/WESTSI]DE CO FAC=M DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORffY LEVYING SPECL4,L TAXES WMHN THE OID
TOWN/WESTSI]DE COMMUNrrY FAC DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY COMMUNffY FACHMM DISTRICT NO. I (OID
TOWN AREA PUBLIC D4PROVFAIENTS)
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a
resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside
Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community
Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982' (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to
establish the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District")
pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), to
finance certain facilities;
MMEREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution
amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December
12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution malting findings as to the complexity of
the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of
Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of
Directors adopted a resolution @er amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional
territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the
District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District
and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolutions, as adopted
by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Resolution');
AS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of
this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the financing of the facilities
(the 'Facilities') referenced in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending
Resolution;
WHEREAS, on March 26, 1996,this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing
as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the
District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the
District to finance the costs of the Facilities;
WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pe g
to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial
Ords.Fa\Ol
evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a ftffl and fair hearing
was held;
S, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions
entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area
Public Improvements ), Autho@g the Levy of a Special Tax Wi@ The District,
Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the
Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the
District" (the "Resolution of Formation') 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Determining the Necessity
to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District' and 'A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority Calling Special Election', which resolutions established the District,
autho@ the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the
District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an
appropriations limit within the District, respectively, and
WHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner
electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act.
NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE IT ORDA@, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and
levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328
and 53340, at the rate and in accordance with the formula set forth in the Resolution of
Formation which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are
hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1996-97 and in each fiscal year thereafter until
payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the 'Bonds') and all costs
of the District, including any costs of the administration thereof.
2. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to determine the
specific special tax rate and amount to levied for each fiscal year for each parcel of real
property and the interests therein the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution
of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds.
3. Properties or entities of the State or local governments shall be exempt from any
levy of the special taxes to the extent set forth in the rate and method of apportionment. of
special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. In no event shall the special taxes be
Ords.Fa\Ol 2
levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the rate and
method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation.
4. All of the collection of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, in
the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds including, but not
limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the payment of the costs of
administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax.
5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the
financial obligations of the District on the tax rolls of the County of Riverside, and the special
taxes shall become delinquent at the same time as other taxes collected on such rolls. The
special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the
same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In
addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax
payments. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to provide all
necessary information to the appropriate officials of the County, and to take all action
necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special
tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the
financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and
provision has been made for payment of all other costs of the District.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may collect one or more installments of
the special taxes by means of direct billing of the owners of real property located within the
District, and any intsallment so billed shall be delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in
any such respective billing to the property owners if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such
means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the
District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. Further, the procedure on
foreclosure of property for delinquent special taxes shall be as described in the Section 7 of the
Resolution of formation and as further specified in the fiscal agreement providing for the terms
of any bonds to be issued for the district to be repaid from the levy of such special taxes. Said
procedures may allow for the bond owners or their representatives to credit bid delinquent
amounts and penalties and interest and foreclosure costs at the foreclosure sale without posting
or paying cash on other compensation, and other wise for reduced minimum bids and other
expedited foreclosure procedures.
6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the
special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of
competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to
the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected.
7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general
circulation published and circulated in the area of the District.
Ords.Fa\Ol 3
8. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of @ passage.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPIED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/NVestside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 14th day of May, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATMT:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALEFORNIA
COUNTY OR IDE ss
CrrY OF ULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, BEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. FA 96-- was duly introduced at a regul-ir meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the
23rd day of April, 1996, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors
on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following roU call vote:
AYES: BOARD ERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD ERS:
ABST BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Autliority-
Secre@
Ords.Fa\Ol 4
30043-01 JHHW:PJT:cra 08/28/95 J1820
03/24/96
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
AFM RECORDANON RETURN TO:
Secretary
Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority
c/o City C-lerk, City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY
FACILMES DISTRICR FINANCING AUTHORM
COMMUNrrY FACILMES DISTRICR NO. 1
(OLDTOWNAREAPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS)
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of
California and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 5331 1,
et. seq., of the California Government Code (the "Act"), the undersigned Secretary of the Old
Town /Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority"), County of
Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax
is hereby imposed by the Board of Directors of the Authority, County of Riverside, State of
California. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of
paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds of which are being used to finance the
public facilities described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and
otherwise to pay the costs of such facilities directly and the costs of administering the below-
mentioned community facilities district.
The special tax is authorized to be levied within the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area
Public Improvements), which has now been officially formed and the hen of the special tax is a
continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in
force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied, and canceled
in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of
special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the California Government Code.
The rate, method of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special
tax is as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Conditions
under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied
and the hen of the special tax canceled are as set forth in said Exhibit B.
Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the County
Recorder of the County of Riverside, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a
lien upon all nonexempt real property within the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public
Improvements), in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways
Code.
The name(s) of the owner(s) and the assessor's tax parcel number(s) of the real property
included within this conununity facilities district and not exempt from the special tax are as set
forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
Reference is made to the third amended boundary map of the community facilities
district recorded at Book - of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page
_, in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which
map is now the final boundary map of the community facilities district.
For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of
owners or purchasers of real property or interests therein subject to this special tax lien,
interested persons should contact the Treasurer of the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590,
telephone number (909) 694-6444.
Dated: 1996.
By:
Secretary,
Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority
-2-
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT
OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
CO TY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
FACILITIES
1.Renovation and Expansion of Old Town First Street Bridge, including but not limited
to: a. preliminary design of First Street to its connection with the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor to include a bridge over Murrieta Creek, b. obtaining all the permits and approvals
which may be required, including City of Temecula, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, California
Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Department of Fish and Wild Life, Riverside County Flood
Control and any other permits and approvals as may be required, c. final design and
construction of facilities as said design is approved by the reviewing agencies to include First
Street from its intersection with Front Street to the proposed Western Bypass Corridor,
d. design and construction of all utilities as may be required by the various utility companies to
provide the required services to the proposed development and otherwise incident to the
foregoing construction, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances.
2. Old Town Gateway Landscaping Project, including but not limited to: a. providing
trees and other landscaping along the westside of Front Street between Front Street and
Murrieta Creek from Rancho California Road to the Post Office, and street tree replacement in
conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan, b. acquire the necessary right-of-way, c. submit a
Landscaping plan to the City Planning Department for review and approval, d. construction
and installation of the landscaping in accordance with the landscape plan as approved, and
e.all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances.
3. Old Town Demonstration Block, including repairs, reconstruction and/or upgrades
to Front Street, Front Street between First Street and Main Street and other incidental street
improvements, and also including, but not limited to: a. provision of a conceptual design and
submission to the City Planning Department for review and approval for the following:
i. landscaping and lighting; ii. public signage, including Gateway entry sign, directional signs,
and street name polesigns; and iii. street improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk
(boardwalk), paving, street lighting with sound system, street furniture to include wood
benches, trash receptacles, newspaper racks, mailboxes, bus shelters, phone booths, and
drinking fountains, all in general conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan, and the
Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, b. preparation of the necessary plans,
specifications for the above scope of work and submit for review by the City and other
interested parties as may be necessary, c. construct the facilities as per approved plans,
d. topography for all of the Old Town shall be provided to facilitate design and to eliminate
potential future drainage problems, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and
appurtenances.
4. Old Town Sewer Improvements, including but not lin-tited to: a. determine, based on
the City's Ultimate Plan, Old Town Specific Plan and Westside Specific Plan, including the
proposed Entertainment Facilities, the location of existing and need for upgrading sanitary
sewer facilities, and any new sanitary sewer facilities, b. present the report to the Eastern
Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the City for review and approval, c. design the facilities
for the sanitary sewer improvements based on the approved report, d. obtain any right-of-way
that may be necessary to construct said improvements, e. construct said improvements to the
satisfaction of EMWD, and f. all associated and incidental facilities and appurtenances.
5. Old Town Water System, including but not limited to: a. determine, based on the
City's Ultimate Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Westside Specific Plan and the proposed
Entertainment Facilities, the location of existing water systems, the needed upgrading, and
needed new water facilities, b. present the report to Rancho California Water, City and Fire
Marshall for review, c. design the facilities as needed and obtain approval by the above
agencies, d. obtain the necessary right-of-way for the proposed improvements, e. construct said
improvements to the satisfaction of Rancho California Water District, and f. all associated and
incidental facilities and appurtenances.
6. Storm Drain Improvements, including but not limited to: a. determine the adequacy
of the storm drain system as proposed in the Old Town Specific Plan (i.e., 3rd and 6th Street
storm drains, 1-15 to Murrieta Creek), b. design said improvements and obtain all necessary
permits for the installation of said improvements (permits may include but not be limited to
Riverside County Flood Control District, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, California Department
of Fish and Game, and Caltrans), c. construct the improvements in accordance with the
approvals of all the above agencies including the City, d. provide for the necessary facilities
along these systems to accept local drainage, and e. all associated and incidental facilities and
appurtenances.
7. Construction of a new roadway as a four (4) lane divided roadway from near the
Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a distance of
approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided roadway, will be
constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent Moraga Drive,
approximately 1,200 feet. Roadway grading will be completed for the future extension of the
Western bypass corridor approximately 3,400 feet from Vincent Moraga Drive to join Rancho
California Road. The work will include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) acquisition of
necessary right-of-way, (b) construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and Rancho California
Road, (c) construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, (d) construction of roadway between the
curbs, consisting of an approximately 78 foot wide roadway with an approximately 12 foot
wide raised median island, (e) installation of landscaping and irrigation, (f) installation of
water system facilities, (g) installation of sanitary sewer system, (h) installation of street
lighting system, (i) construction and/or installation of any facilities or appurtenances incident
to any of the foregoing, and (j) costs of engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public
easements, planning, insurance, legal and accounting expenses and coordination related to the
above-listed facilities.
8. The elimination of any fixed special assessment liens imposed on any property
located in the District pursuant to assessment proceedings to finance all or any portion of the
improvements described in the preceding Section 7.
OTHER
Costs of engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public easements, planning,
insurance, legal and accounting expenses and coordination related to the above-listed facilities.
Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisals, reserve fund,
capitalized interest, bond counsel, special tax consultant, financing consultant, bond and
official statement printing and all other incidental expenses.
Administrative fees of the City of Temecula, the Authority, the District and the Bond
trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and the Bonds.
-2-
EXHIBIT B
[insert Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax here]
B-1
DMBIT C
ASSESSOR!S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNERS OF LAND WITHIN
OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
Assessor's Parcel Nos. Names and Addresses of Prol2erty Owners
C-1
t
ITEN4 26
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIR
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Starlight Ridge - Traffic Safety Investigation
PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council support the findings of the attached Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study.
BACKGROUND:
The following report has been prepared at the request of the City Council to document and
quantify traffic operations within the Starlight Ridge neighborhood.
After years of working with specific individuals within this tract, we have been requested to
conduct a comprehensive traffic analysis of all streets within Starlight Ridge with focus on the
five residential collector streets listed below:
1 . Cosmic Drive
2.Santa Cecilia Drive
3.Asteroid Way
4.Southern Cross Road
5. Agena Street
The entire length of Santa Cecilia Drive has been analyzed even though a portion is within the
Lake Village neighborhood.
We specifically looked at 20 intersections internal to Starlight Ridge and 4 access points to the
surrounding arterial street systems. Our investigation covered five (5) years of history and
includes tested and approved Traffic Engineering Techniques. We have documented existing
traffic volumes and sampled vehicle speeds utilizing pneumatic traffic counters. This effort was
very important in order to quantify citizen perceptions of vehicle speeds and volumes.
We then analyzed all data collected including all accidents reported from January 1, 1991 to
December 31, 1995. Our field investigation included a complete study of each of the twenty
(20) intersections to gather information regarding horizontal and vertical alignments,
intersection sight distance restrictions, intersection safe approach speeds, roadway widths and
existing pedestrian facilities. Our office research included the review of subdivision
development plans to check roadway grades, widths and curve radii. Staff also gathered
-1- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\starlight.rpt/ajp
information from our emergency response agencies. Temecula Police and Fire representatives
have been contacted and questioned as to the impacts of potential traffic calming techniques.
The Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study, submitted under separate cover, should provide the
comprehensive analysis needed to decide what further actions would be appropriate for this
neighborhood.
The cost of implementing staffs recommendation is approximately $1,050.00 and is detailed
below.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Install five (5) 'Stop' signs at $125 each $600.00
Remove six (6) 25 MPH signs at $50 each $300.00
Sandblast existing speed limit legends at $25 each $150.00
TOTAL $1,050.00
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Account No. 100-1 64-602-5244.
ATTACHMENTS*
1 . Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study
2.Location map with project recommendations
-2- r:\agdrpt\96\0423\starfight.rpt/ajp
Remove Existina Speed Limit s'
ZD igns
Install "STOP" sign
Request BUSH Trimming
CALII'
c
@l-
Reques Request TREE Trimmina
Trimmincy
Install " STOP" s'
I "STOPF' SiLyn
quest BU
Trimming
Install "STOP" sigi
VISTA
GENERAL REQUEST TO CLEAR THE EXITING PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN USE
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
EXHIBIT t'At'
ST IRLI IIT IIZID E
,NFET'Y T DY
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC DIVISION
April 16, 1996
STARLIGHT RIDGE
TRAFFIC STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT I-HSTORY
A.Traffic Requests
B.Issues Taken to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
C.Collision lestory
D.Public Feedback
II.EXISTING CONDITIONS
A.Traffic Volumes
B.Vehicular Speed Data
C.Roadway Classifications
Ill. POTENTIAL SAFETY @ROVEMENTS
A.Stop/Yield Controls
B.Striping Collector Streets
C.One-Way Streets
D.Speed Undulations
E.Roadway Narrowing
F.Road Closures
G.Sidewalks
H.Posting Speed Limits
1. Enforcement
J.Public Awareness Program
IV.RECO@NDATIONS
A.Stop/Yield Controls
B.Striping Collector Streets
C.One-way Streets
D.Speed Undulations
E.Road Narrowing
F.Road Closures
G.Sidewalks
H.Posted Sped Limits
1. Enforcement
J.Public Awarenes Program
STARLIGHT RIDGE TRAFFIC STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLES
Table "A!' Starlight Ridge - Summary of Stafrs Efforts
Table "B" Collision Hstory-Intemal Roadways and Surrounding Intersections
Table "C" Internal Accident Specifics
Table "D" Speed and Volume Analysis
E ITS
Exhibit "N' Daily Vehicular Volumes
Exhibit "B" Data Collection Stations
Exhibit "C" Average Speed Data
Exhibit "D" Critical Speed Data
Exhibit "E" Residential Collector Street System
Exhibit "F' Typical Street Section-Collector Street
Exhibit "g' Typical Street Section-General Local Street
Exhibit "IT' Access Road, Restricted Local Street or Minor Interior Street
Exhibit "I" Caltrans Traffic Manual
Exhibit "Y' Starlight Ridge Stop Survey
Exhibit "K" Intersection Numbering for Stop/Yield Analysis
Exhibit "L" Potential Striping Configuration
Exhibit "Nf Affected Area Exhibit for Collector Striping
Exhibit "Y' Speed Undulation Analysis
Exhibit "O" General Request to Clear the Exiting Public Right of Way to Encourage
Pedestrian Use
APPENDIX
Appendix "X' Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Reports and Pertinent Portions
of the Minutes
Appendix "B" Count/Speed Profile Data Sheets
Appendix "C" Portions of the California Vehicle Code
Appendix "D" Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
Appendix "E" Citizen Letters Regarding Starlight Ridge
2 Ft7%.b-\9@V"ofcm rh
STARLIGHT RIDGE TRAFFIC
SAFETY STUDY
L PROJECT HISTORY
In order to understand the extensive effort dedicated to improving traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge
neighborhood, it is important to review previous work efforts provided by the Department of Public
Works. This includes direct communication with citizens, items taken to the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission (PTSC) and a five (5) year collision history. Public feedback is also included to
document public communications with the Department of Public Works.
A. Traffic Requests
The Traffic Division of the Department of Public Works logs and tracks citizen requests when
unable to completely address their concerns during initial communications. Table "X' is a
record of all interactions with the neighborhood of Starlight Ridge between June 1993, and
March 1996. Because staff response does not always reflect the specific item requested,
every citizen is notified of the recommended action and given the opportunity to appeal the
decision. Of the twenty-one requests received in this area nineteen have been completed.
This current effort should help to resolve those issues.
B. ]Issues taken to the Public/Trafric Safety Commission (P/TSC)
Due to requests received to close or modify certain public streets within Temecula, including
Starlight Ridge, staff pursued the development of a policy to guide public officials in
determining a community supported improvements that would be consistent throughout
Temecula and equitable for the citizens that commit to its funding. This policy, which
reflected efforts being implemented throughout the world, was first submitted to the P/TSC
on August 25, 1994. Appendix "X' contains all of the agenda reports taken to the P/TSC
regarding the approval of the policy for closure or modification of traffic flow on public
streets and other issues generated from within Starlight Ridge. Between August of 1994 and
February 22, 1996, the Commission has faced issues and concerns raised by members of
Starlight Ridge, on eight (8) separate occasions. This reflects staff s and the P/TSC efforts
to address all citizen concerns in a public forum.
C. Collision History
A main component of any historic review of traffic safety includes a complete assessment of
the area's reported collision history. For this project, staff has reviewed all collision reports
submitted to the Department of Public Works by the Temecula Police Department for any
streets within Starlight Ridge, and it's adjourning roads. This is not the first time each of
these reports have been reviewed. Every report is reviewed upon delivery to City offices, to
identify operational improvements that could possibly reduce the probability of a future
incident. Table "B" and Table "C' identifies all reported collisions within the Starlight Ridge
I R:\Iaubem\96stuhte\@e.stu th
area with the specific details of each incident. It also shows reported collisions at surrounding
intersections accessing the arterial street system, for your reference.
D. Public Feedback
During the Starlight Ridge investigation, staff received feedback in the form of written and
verbal correspondence. This feedback was immediately reviewed and incorporated into our
project development. Staff felt that it is important to include copies of the letters received
regarding this area of Temecula. Appendix "E" includes all written correspondence
regarding this area of Temecula, that were submitted for our consideration and response.
H. EXISTING CONDMONS
In order to quantify existing traffic conditions within the Starlight Ridge area, the three most
important data sets were collected. Traffic volumes, speeds and existing street system characteristics
have been studied. An outside traffic counting firm was contracted to collect volume and speed
information so that any allegations of data bias would be eliminated. We also modified this data
collection effort, during our study, to rapidly accommodate citizen feedback received.
A. Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volumes are an important indication of roadway operations. Traffic volumes
were collected in August of 1995, and are listed in Table "D" and displayed on Exhibit "X'.
The City of Temecula's General Plan identifies local streets as having a "qualitative limit of
acceptable traffic volumes in a residential environment is approximately 2,000 vehicles a day".
All of the streets in the Starlight Ridge area have existing volumes that are all below this
acceptable limit. Appendix "B" contains copies of all of the speed and volume data collection
sheets for each of the five (5) count locations. These printouts identify the 5 mph bracket that
each vehicle fits into for each 15 minute period.
B. Vehicular Speed Data
Over the past three years, staff has received several phone calls from citizens in Starlight
Ridge concerned about the speeds of vehicles as they pass their residence. Most of those
contacts were with citizens that live on either Cosmic Drive, Santa Cecilia Drive, Agena
Street or Asteroid Way. Staff has also received concerns regarding the speed of vehicles on
Milky Way Drive, said to be generated by the large apartment complex.
In order to obtain a representative sampling of existing speeds throughout this tract, speed
counters were placed at those locations shown on Exhibit "B". Average speeds are shown
for four streets based on data that was obtained in August of 1995. The location on Cosmic
Drive was re-counted in March of 1996, due to feedback received from a nearby resident.
A concern was raised that sampled speeds at a point on Cosmic Drive were not representative
of the fastest area, and that a tree-trinuning operation could have negatively impacted our
data. The new week-long data collection effort reflects similar information to the initial data
collected, reinforcing a fairly low average speed, as shown on Exhibit "C". This also shows
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 2 R--\Iaub=@@tt\@e-stu rh
TABLE "A"
STARLIGHT RIDGE - SUMMARY OF STAFF' S EFFORTS
RESPONSE ..... ......
DATE LOCATION ... REQUEST
06/16/93 Southern Cross at Agena St. All-Way Stop at intersection Installed 'Intersection Ahead' sign with advisory speed sign
06/29/93 Southern Cross west of Margarita Rd Remove 'Children at Play' sign Removed illegal sign
03/09/94 Moontide Court Radar Trailer Display Unit Radar Trailer placed 07/26/95
03/17/94 Cosmic Dr near Santa Cecilia Dr Slow vehicles Radar Trailer placed 08/09/95
05/26/94 Cosniic Dr at Santa Cecilia Dr Lower speeds & volumes Radar Trailer placed 08/09/95
10/20/94 Santa Cecilia Dr 25 MPH speed limit sign Radar Trailer placed 04/18/95
11/04/94 Milky Way Dr at Asteroid Way Speed limit signs Posted (4)-25 mph signs on Cosniic Drive, Radar Trailer 10/18/95
01/24/95 Rancho California Road & Cosmic Staff generated Evaluated for traffic signal installation
03/21/95 Asteroid Way Need stop & speed li@t signs Stops installed on Milky Way Dr at Astroid Way
03/23/95 Asteroid Way Meet with resident to discuss concerns Met with resident and Police Department representative
05/25/95 Starlight Ridge Check stop warrants at 4 intersections Installed 4 - 25 mph signs on Cosmic Dr
05/31/95 Santa Cecilia Drive Staff generated Applied and aquired a grant for sidewalk improvements
06/05/95 Santa Cecilia Dr - Mira Lonia Drive to Sidewalk and School Pedestrian signs Received grant for sidewalk installation & installed School Pedestrian
Cosniic Drive signs
08/07/95 Milky Way Dr Speed undulations Does not meet criteria approved by City Council
08/07/95 Asteroid Way at Rancho Cal Rd Traffic signal Evaluate for Traffic Signal Priority List
10/05/95 Sky Terrace Dr Slow vehicles Police Traffic Division
11/15/95 Agena Street Relocate 'Not a Through Street" sign Work order completed
11/30/95 Cosmic Drive Staff generated Radar Trailer Placed 01/10/96
01/17/96 Starlight Ridge Meet to discuss potential traffic calming Met with Mr. Bruckman and Mr. Maston
01/23/9 Starlight Ridge Meet to discuss cost of their option Met with Mr. Bruckman and Mr. Maston
Starlight Ridge Radar Trailer Requested Police Department implement Radar Trailer on Cos@c and
Santa Cecilia.
r:\Isuberm\%'4tarlite\surlight.thl rh
TABLE "B"
COLLISION HISTORY
INTERNAL ROADWAYS
.. .....
@1992 1994
@ST."ET@.
1993@.
. ...........
:@:PDO
-URY
PDO INJ PDO:." :INJ PDO INJ
AGENA STREET 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASTEROID WAY 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
COSMIC DRIVE 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
1994 Vehicle hit parked car on Moontide Court
PDO - Prop@ Damage Only
SURROUNDING INTERSECTIONS
INTERSE ION 1992 994:@:@ 19
@1993: 9
1@991
Rancho California Road at Cosmic Drive/Humber 1 1 0 4 3
Drive
Rancho California Road at Asteroid Way/Yukon 0 1 1 0 5
Road
Margarita Road at Southern Cross Road 0 0 0 0 0
Rancho Vista Road at Southern Cross Road 0 0 0 0 0
R-'\LAUBERM\96STARLrrE\COLLISON.HIS rh
"TABLE C"
STARLIGHT RIDGE
INTERNAL ACCIDENT SPECIFICS
CIDENT: E:
]@DA
1991 Agena Street 11/17/91 4:3 5 p.m. Broadside Right of way violation
Cosmic Drive 10/25/91 4:43 p.m. Head on Unsafe speed
Santa Cecilia Drive 10/28/91 10:25 a.m. Broadside Right of way violation
1992 Agena Street 04/15/92 3:3 5 p.m. Mt object Unsafe speed
1993 Asteroid Way 05/27/93 10:44 p.m. Bicyclist-fall Drug /alcohol
Cosmic Drive 12/31/93 1: 13 a.m. Mt object Improper turn
1994 j Moontide Court* 05/28/94 6:30 a.m. I-lit parked car Unsafe turn, inattention
1995 Santa Cecilia Drive 02/15/95 12:01 a.m. Head on Drug /alcohol
Southern Cross Road 03/17/95 11:46 p.m. I-Et object Unsafe speed
Incidents involved only one moving vehicle
Susceptible to correction with minor street stops
R:\m@\s@te@spe rh
TABLE "D"
SPEED AND VOLUME ANALYSIS
TE@ @TTON 24 HOI(JR AVE GE'.. THEO@TI L. S.
T FFIC...:@:.. SPEED PE CENT]ILE POS
VOLUMT SPEED
Santa Cecilia Drive, south of Agena Street
08/15/95 Northbound 635 32 mph 38 mph 35 mph Post "25 MpW' school
zone at west end.
08/15/95 Southbound 651 31 mph 36 mph 35 mph
Southern Cross Road west of Virgo Court
08/15/95 Eastbound 443 27 mph 33 mph 30 mph
08/15/95 Westbound 457 20 mph 36 mph 30 mph
Agena Street west of Cosmic Drive
04/03/96. Eastbound 201 27 mph 33 mph 25 mph Recounted, questionable data for eastbound
08/15/95 Westbound 239 26 mph 31 mph 25 mph traffic.
Astroid Way between Mlky Way Drives
08/15/95 Northbound 232 32 mph 40 mph 35 mph
08/15/95 Southbound 385 30 mph 36 mph 35 mph
R:\LAUBERM\9MARLrrE\SPEEDVOL.TBD rh
SI
@DATE..@@ DIRECTION. 24 HOUR.@@ :AVFRAGE @85TH THEORFTICAL@
TRAF.'FIC@@: SPEED@:@ PERCENTILF,.@@@ @POSTING
@VOLUME SPEED
Cosmic Drive, south of North Star Court
08/15/95 Northbound 791 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
08/15/95 Southbound 897 27 mph 32 mph 30 mph
Cosmic Drive, between North Star Court and Twilight Court
03/20/96 Northbound 177 28 mph 34 mph 30 mph Partial count (4:00 pm to midnight)
03/20/96 Southbound 252 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (3:00 pm to @dnight)
03/21/96 Northbound 498 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/21/96 Southbound 592 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/22/96 Northbound 549 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/22/96 Southbound 602 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/23/96 Northbound 656 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday
03/23/96 Southbound 616 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday
03/24/96 Northbound 472 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday
03/24/96 Southbound 588 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday
03/25/96 Northbound 415 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Construction activity on Rancho California Road
03/25/96 Southbound 578 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Construction activity on Rancho California Road
03/26/96 Northbound 414 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/26/96 Southbound 709 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (midnight t PM)
03/27/96 Northbound 281 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph o 3:00
TABLE "D" SPEED @ VOL@ ANALYSIS 2 R:\LAUBER@STARLrrE\SPEEDVOL.TBD rh
DATE @DMCTION. @@24@HOUR@ AVERAGE: :85TH THEO]KETICAL
PERCENTILE POSTING
TRAFFIC .@SPEED@@
VOLUME SPEED
03/27/96 Southbound 354 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (midnight to 3:00 pm)
03/27/96 Northbound 273 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial count (2:00 pm to midnight)
03/27/96 Southbound 389 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (2:00 pm to midnight)
03/28/96 Northbound 479 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/28/96 Southbound 671 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/29/96 Northbound 508 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/29/96 Southbound 591 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
03/30/96 Northbound 504 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Saturday
03/30/96 Southbound 238 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (tube removed)
03/31/96 Northbound 352 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Sunday
03/31/96 Southbound 569 28 mph 32 mph 30 mph
04/01/96 Northbound 467 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
04/01/96 Southbound 613 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
04/02/96 Northbound 438 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
04/02/96 Southbound 610 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph
04/03/96 Northbound 267 29 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (midnight to 2:00 pm)
04/03/96 Southbound 289 28 mph 33 mph 30 mph Partial Count (midnight to 2:00 pm)
Weekday Northbound 533 29 mph 33 mph
Av es Southbound 643
TABLE "D" SPEED @ VOL@ ANALYSIS 3 R:\LAUBER@ARLFMSPEEDVOL.TBD rh
DAILY VEHICULAR VOLUMES
Weekday Volumes
@JLA MILI< RO@
2 CAI-)I
CANI 01
F
A
CT
0
RANCH
z
z
EXHIBIT
-i
--WY
RNIA)
- I
VISTA
I
DATA COLLECTION STATIONS
EXHIBIT "B"
AVERAGE SPEED DATA
Nfiles per hour
t-A MILI@
P, o@
I
2 CAI-)I
CAN NOR
STAF
IVAN r, ALPI IA
PL RTH
RGO
F
RANCHO
<(
m ul A/Oyl
0 ficil
EXHMIT
that drivers travel at about the same speeds, on the average, with very little daily variations.
Exhibit "D" shows the critical speed for each roadway, which is typically used as a bench
mark speed for establishment of posted speed limits.
C. Roadway Classirications
After completing the field survey of each of the streets in Starlight Ridge, we found three (3)
different road types throughout the development. These roadway types included five (5)
residential collector streets at 44 feet wide, eight (8) residential local streets at 40 feet wide,
and six (6) 32 foot wide cul-de-sacs. Exhibit "E" shows the collector street system that was
established by the County of Riverside when this area was developed. Exhibits "F", "g' and
"IT' are copies of the County's typical street sections for the three (3) roadway classifications
identified above.
M. POTENTIAL SAFETY ]IMPROVEMENTS
Due to the general concern for safety within the Starlight Ridge neighborhood, staff has investigated
ten (10) potential safety improvements including traffic calming strategies. The recently approved
Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets (see Appendix "D") was used
to guide our evaluation of all traffic calming possibilities. Although posting of stop signs are not an
acceptable practice for speed control, twenty intersections were reviewed to determine potential
safety improvements that could be realized by establishing additional stop or yield controls.
A. Stop and/or Yield Controls
In order to lend some insight into the methodology used in determining the appropriate
location for intersection controls, I would like to review published information supplied by
the internationally recognized Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The following is
an excerpt from a very popular information handout regarding this issue.
WHY DON'T THEY PUT IN MORE STOP SIGNS?
A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective control devices when
usedatthenghtplacewdundertherightconditions. Itisintendedtohelp
&avers andpedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right-of-way.
One common misuse of stop signs is to arbitrarily interrupt through traffic,
either b causing it to stop, or by causing such an inconvenience as toforce
y
the traffic to use other routes. "ere stop son are installed as "nuisances
or "speed breakers ", there is a high incidence of intentional violation. In
those locations where vehicles do stop, the speed reduction is effective only
in the immediate i4cinity of the stop sign, andftequently speeds are actually
higher between intersections. For these reasons, it should not be used as a
speed control device.
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 3 R-,Uau@@@tc\@e.stu th
CRITICAL SPEED DATA
Tffiles per hour
OAD
Il@IM
ùCAPI@ICF
CANOII)A
NOR
STAF
,-@IVANI ALPI-IA
PL CL
RTI-I
A
[A
p L-
RANCHO
<(
CK [-LAz
'ONo,y,,
0
LY EXHILBIT Dv'
RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR STREET SYSTEM
ml
1REMORA ST
ùCAPRICE CT
3CANrilDA DR NOR]
S @AR
L-PHA C:)
C-
3
RCO
VERONDA T
T, 0 PL
p
m
EXIIIEBIT "Flv
RIW "W
44'
'34'
10
A.C. mwowv r
of"
sum
SECTION *B"
IV/1w
44'
34'
to 10,@
4 Poor A.Cp"vEmr#r Prop Pmr
. YLOPE cv@
SEE srD. NO. 212 rOR AC. ASE COUOP$tr
D(KE DErAlL rw AVE
AORR WIDrAf SMfTr Sf'CrfOOV Mg ALL COLLLrCrk7# SECTION
CL s r,,ef, rs - 54'lAfPNO VLr&trov rS oov 4@- iplw
CDMNM RWWA"S CVRAPASE AAV SWAWLR rV Of
t?t rERmtwv or sm rts r
Of,vf@ PAVIA'A rpvjrxwss?v of A5pmAtrcowcRrrf-. room mt!r/ol-,vriAL srpLrrrS ANO 5'ASPNAtr covcptrrtr rog ,Vrr,*/O"
calwmrpclAL ON ,vousrq,At srplrfrs.
'ILI CUP& ANO ourri-R Pu se, rrptr 'A.f' uvt ess ormtr*w,sf, spt-clr/,.,7.
EXHI]BIT "G'l
RIW R/W
60,
.40
/0' 32 f
Art#.
it d
Pwr St oor A.C
!14 Pro ovc
SECTION "B" rED 9UMNAOt
RIW
60,
40
lof - 32 1
A.C
6A.%Lr
IL
SECTION "A"
C SOF&MAW M&r WV Or S&L
m
CURV AW IVOE r"V A - 6, IlovL I-SS
SPCCINED.
PAmr w.tori s rfflrrr se-rrlov ov #i'plw
SEE STO. NO. 212 F70R AC. OIKE OErAlL
EMIIIBIT "H"
CD
406 Note: Right of way may not be required for some private streets.
,6 0 4b
RIW RIW
50'MIN
32'
Jor A.cpAvEwAfr
SLOPE
rEO SU~A"
SECTION *B"
#?/W kV/or
5 O' MIN.
Aft#.
6'@
sioLrWALK -SiDeWALor
A. c @mEv r
5tc
Ix
9.
SECTION "A"
CONOtOvCD rNlcPrOvtsS Of a45t AIVO StIRrACt rO Of Otrffflm/wf'o or Solt rrsr
0) WIAIIAOUN PA VINC, FHIC OROVFS 5 to of ,!V;A,5pifAir coivcortrru.
-10' m,,v Rlw is RrouiPFD rOv ACCF@'SS ROADS
SEE STO. NO. 212 FOR A.C DIKE DETAIL
ALL -UVO AOVD Gurrrq rr 7t rrpc A-6 Yovit-s, ormeef.-isL- sircip-&-o
A school crossing may look dangerousfor children to use, causingparents
to demand a stop sign to halt traffic. Now a vehicle which had been a
problem for 3 seconds while approaching and passing the intersection
becomes aproblemfor a much longerperiod A situation of indecision is
created as to when to cross as a pedestrian or when to start as a motorist.
Normal gaps in traffic through which crossings could be made safely no
longer exist. An intersection which previously was not busy now looks like
a major intersectioil It really isn't - itjust looks like it. It doesn't even look
safer and it usually isn't.
Most drivers are reasonable and prudent with no intention of maliciously
violating traffic regulations; however, when an unreasonable restriction is
imposes it may result Invariant wolations In such cases, the stop sign can
create afalse sense of security in a pedestrian and an attitude of contempt
in a motorist. 7hese two attitudes can and often do conj7ict with tragic
results.
Well-developeg nationally recognized guidelines help to indicate when such
controls become necessmy. 7hese guidelines take into consideration, among
other things, the probability of vehicles arriving at an intersection at the
same time, the length of time traffic must wait to enter, and the availability
of safe crossing opportunities.
The recognized guidelines used throughout the State of California are those contained in the
Cafifomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Traffic Manual. Exhibit "I" consolidates
the specific Caltrans warrants for Stops, All-Way Stops, and Yield controls. Exhibit "J"
displays the results of applying each of these warrants to each of the twenty intersections as
numbered on Exhibit "IC'.
Of the eleven locations found to meet minor street stop warrants, seven (7) locations already
have minor street stops. The intersection of Southern Cross Road and Spica Court only has
one (1) minor street stop, and staff recommends installing a stop on the other minor street
approach as war-ranted. Of the four (4) remaining intersections, three (3) are recommended
for installation on the minor street approach. These three (3) intersect collector streets with
elevated residential traffic volumes. The only location meeting warrants and not being
recommend for controls is a "I" intersection between two (2) local streets. Staff has already
made a recommendation to the P/TSC for stops on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive which
was not supported by the Commission, but is again recommended.
B. Striping Collector Streets
Currently all of the residential collector streets within Starlight Ridge have 44 foot widths
from curb to curb. Without any channelization (striping), the streets have eight (8) feet
reserved for parking on each side of each street leaving 28 feet for two (2) way traffic. This
means if cars are parked on both sides of the street and there are vehicles approaching, you
have an effective lane width of 14 feet. When no cars are parked and there is no on-co@ng
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 4 P--\ia@\9@@te\@.stu rh
CALTRANS TRAMC MANUAL
STOP Siffns
Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where wan-anted. A STOP sign may
bewarranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exist:
1 .On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the normal right of way rule is unduly
hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to correction by STOP signs.
2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway.
3At the intersection of two main highways. The highway tratic to be stopped depends on approach speeds, volumes, and
turning movements.
4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street.
ù. On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less dm 10 miles per hour.
6.At an unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
7.At other m ons where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record indicates a need for control
by the STOP sign.
Multi-way STOPS
The "Multi-way Stop" installation may be useful at some locations. It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic
onthe intmmting roads is approximately equal. A traffic control signal is more satisfactory for an intersection with a heavy volume
oftra]Yic. Any of the following conditions may warrant a Multi-way STOP sign installation:
1 .Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the Multi-way stop may be an mterun measure that can be mstalled
quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installations.
2.An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to
correction by a Multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and lcft turn collisions as well as right-angle
collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per
hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and
(b)The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units
per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per
vehicle during the maximum hours, but
(c)When the 85-perccnfile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum
vehicular volume wan-ant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
YIELD SiErns
The YIELD sign (RI-2) assigns right of way to tratic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD
sign need stop only when necessary to avoid interference with other traffic that is given the right of way. The YIELD sign may be
warranted:
1.On a minor road at the entrance to an intersection where it is necessary to assign right of way to the major road, but where
a stop is not necessary at all times, and where the safe approach speed on the minor road exceeds IO miles per hour.
2.On the entrance ramp to an expressway where an acceleration lane is not provided.
3Within an intersection with a divided highway, where a STOP sign is present at the entrance to the first road way and further
control is necessary at the entrance to the second roadway, and where the median width between the two roadways exceeds
30 feet.
4.Where there is a separate or channelized right-turn lane, without an adequate acceleration lane.
5.Al any intersection where a special problem exists and where an engineering study indicates the problem to be susceptible
to correction by use of the YIELD sign.
EXHIBIT "I"
STARLIGHT RIDGE
STOPS ALL-WAY STOPS YIELDS ACTION
INTERSECTION
RECOMMENDED
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3a 3b 3c 1 2 3 4 5
COSMIC DRIVE @ x K K x x K x Mii1pr@ Sti66t stt)o @i@
1)Nebula Lane
2) Twilight Coun K X x 'K X None
3) North Star Court K x x x x n K X X K X K X x @T T@'
4) Santa Cecilia Drive x x None
5) Borealis Drive x x K X None
6) Asteroid Way x x X j None
7) Agena Street x x K X None
SANTA CECILIA DIUVE @
8)Vcrdadero Place
9) Carino Place M' inor ]@@g
10) Escolacata Drive X None
I 1) Agena Street X K Ix @.m
AGENA STREET @ x 'K X X X K X X X K X X None
12)Candida Drive
13) Southem Cross Road x x x x X X X X X X X X None
14)Sky Tcrraix Drive
x Ix l@ x I x Ix I X IX IX IX IX IX IX IX IX inone
SOUTHERN CROSS RD @ x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X None
15)Moontidc Court
M.to
16) Spica Courtx x x x @@V X x x x x x x x x x x mor Str@t! S
17) Sky Terrace Drive x x x x x x X X X X X X K X X None
MILKY WAY DRIVE @ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X IX None
18)Borealis Drive
19) Asteroid Way (North) x x x x X X X x x x x x x x Ix Bush te
20) Asteroid Way (South) x I x I x Ix I x Ix I x ix I x I x I x I x x x x Ix Ix inone
&'Meets Warrant Meets Warrant & Already Installed n Vegetation RemovaVTrim Requested
EXHIBIT "J" R@@UB@@.MLb
IN i'ERSECTION NUMBERING
1REMORA ST
ùCAPRICE CT
3CANDIDA DR
,4EVANI
PL
T,
p
<
co cn
0
cr
N
STA
ALPH
VERON
PL
so/vo
EXHMIT "K"
FOR STOP/YIELD ANALYSIS
IRGO
T
vehicles your effective lane width is 44 feet. This is not positive guidance and helps to explain
the variations in vehicle speeds.
Due to the fact that vehicles travel faster on wider roads with large side clearances, we feel
that striping these collectors could possibly reduce vehicular speeds and should help to
separate parked cars, bicycles and vehicular traffic, which would improve safety. This
painting could certainly be viewed as a visual eye-sore for adjacent residents and a petition
requesting citizen input is advised prior to further development. Exhibit "L" identifies a
suggested striping pattern restricting two-way travel to the 20 feet in the center of each
roadway. This also provides for a 23 foot separation between the travel way and the adjacent
properties. The only two roads currently meeting the volume requirement in the Policy for
Street Modifications are Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive. Exhibit "M' identified those
lots that would be required to sign a petition identifying the need to participate in funding for
this improvement.
The costs associated with this striping configuration, if placed on Cosmic Drive and Santa
Cecilia Drive, is estimated to run approximately $1,500.
C. One-Way Streets
The installation of a one-way traffic restriction is not easily achieved. By far, the foremost
obstacle to further the consideration of the one-way street alternative is the fact that a
proximate couplet street must be present. With the reverse-direction couplet, volumes are
split between two (2) routes. Typically, this means a reduction for one street, but an increase
for the couplet. This increase is politically acceptable in most circumstances only if the street
is already commercial by nature, and in need of additional traffic exposure.
The one-way tool is impacted in many ways to the adjacent properties. Access becomes a
constant irritant. However, the traffic efficiency of the route becomes vastly improved, as
conflicting turning movements are eliminated. The one-way couplet setup can accommodate
a high traffic demand with ease. Although not common, it is an option which should be
considered if the logical couplet can be developed. The one-way couplet is a traffic calming
tool which may provide both a perceived improvement to quality of life, and an actual
improvement to traffic efficiency and safety.
The street modification policy requires that an engineering safety study determine that the
proposed traffic flow modification will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street
or on streets which may be impacted by diverted traffic. Due to the lack of any one-way
couplets for Cosmic Drive, Santa Cecilia Drive or Agena Street, this idea would only have
negative ramifications to traffic efficiency and safety. Also, the creation of any one-way street
would require a petition signed by all residents bounded by Rancho California Road,
Margarita Road, Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive.
D. Speed Undulations
In 1993 the City of Temecula approved a policy to be applied to the potential implementation
of speed undulations on public streets. Prior to the construction of speed undulations, the
Starlight Ridge Tmffic Safet-y Study 5 R-,@Wft@te@.stu rh
POTENTIAL STRIPING CONFIGURATION
cu R-IM
2Z t>@E-L.INE (ujt*ITE)
16
q :SKIP (Yf-I.LOVUS
I 0
zz/ L-Ak4E
PP-C)i>F-r-,rly L-i"E
E@IBIT "Lll-
t A -i
IA3
N
_III
-n
%-L
z
VISTA
I
AFFECTED AREA EXHIBIT
For COLLECTOR STRIPING
EXHMIT "Mot
STARLIGHT RIDGE
SPEED UNDUIATION ANALYSIS
Prior to iconstructi6 @@@bf 6@d . COSMIC., @:@S !D@ SO.UMER N. I @@:AGENA
@@@@@:@@STIREET
idati(sh ih @i bi tt@t DPJ
ROAD@@
meet fOI16 it6 i i@ i
1)A "Speed Undulation Petition" signed by
at least sixty-five (65%) of the affected
property owners shall be filed with the
City of Temecula Department of Public
Works, Traffic Engineering Division.
2)The average daily traffic shall range
@.@3 5 8 @'.533@ 340
............
between 1,200-2,500 vehicles in a twenty-
four (24) hour period.
.. .. .. .....
.. . .. .. .. .. ....
.... ..... ..
3) The speed limit shall be no greater than 25 mph
. . .. ..... .....
twenty-five (25) mph as determined by
State law.
.. .. .. .. ..
.. . .. .. .. . .. .....
. .. .. .....
4) At least sixty percent (60%) of the 67%
surveyed vehicles are exceeding the
twenty-five (25) mph speed limit.
5) The subject street: 44'@ @i @44t@ 44 44'
40'
a.Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide
unless approved by City Engineer,
b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic 2 2 2 2 2
lanes.
c. Shall not have a grade greater than 1: 5@%@ 5.1%
@io 00/0@ < 5%
..... ..
five percent (5%) in the section where "M Max
.. ..... .. .
undulations are to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (1/4) mile > 1,320' > 1,320' > 1,3201 > 1,320'
in length.
e.Shall not have severe vertical or
horizontal alignment features.
f Shall not be a truck route or transit
route.
Shall not be an important access route 'Access :::Accegs@ Access.: @.::Access
R6iit6 @Rbute
for emergency vehicles.
te.
h.Shall not be listed on the City
Circulation Plan, unless approved by
City Engineer.
6/ Meets criteria Does not meet criteria Basic speed law
No person shall dfive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and
the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a s@ which endangers the safety of persons or prope@.
EXHIBIT "N"9 R:ILALM TARLITE\UNDULATN.ANA rh
subject street section shall meet the criteria shown on Exhibit "N'. The five (5) most highly
traveled roadways within this tract has been evaluated and found to not meet the required
criteria.
E. Roadway Narrowing
In Australia, Europe, and in various American cities, there is an application of width
restrictions, particularly within intersections, with the intention of creating "slow points"
along a corridor. The intersection areas typically provide the agency with existing right-of-
way within which to construct traffic circles, landscaped circle medians, necking, and angled
or constricted vehicular paths.
Narrowing of a route outside of an intersection is also utilized, particularly in Australia, to
either horizontally deflect, or to "squeeze" traffic through short areas where there is no
shoulder comfort zone. The reasonable drivers will slow in these areas and proceed
cautiously.
As can be anticipated, there is a risk management concern for creating a public hazard which
must be countered with proper design review, the application of traffic warning devices, sight-
distance concerns, etc. The concept of roadway narrowing to slow vehicles can be proven
by driver reaction, yet it runs directly contrary to the policies of highway safety long
employed in the United States. As the road widens with the provision of a clear shoulder area
fi7ee of obstacles, the speeds increase incrementally, yet the accident rate drops dramatically.
Hghway designers in America have for decades smoothed traffic and made it more efficient
by widening lanes, providing shoulders, and removing obstacles. The application of
horizontal narrowing to calm traffic, is the opposite side of the coin. By making the roadway
appear more dangerous, traffic will slow. In America for reasons of liability exposure, the
trick is how to make it appear to the driver to be dangerous, yet not operate less safely.
The primary purpose of a roadside treatment such as a curb extension or other horizontal
narrowing is to transmit a message to approaching traffic that they are not on an arterial
street. It has long been the practice of roadway engineers to smooth the flow of traffic and
increase the safety margin by widening streets and creating an obstacle-free shoulder or buffer
area. With calnidng as an objective, the contrary measures of introducing obstacles into the
buffer areas in order to present a less forgiving environment are applied. Most typically,
roadside treatments consist of a choker treatment limiting the width of the street either at
selected @d-block locations, or most commonly at intersections. The narrowing has a
secondary impact of making a more controlled pedestrian crossing.
Statistics can show that traffic accidents are more likely to occur in areas which look open
and clear of conflict, but which have hidden obstacles. Roadways with more apparent
obstacles sometimes operate with better accident rates than roadways with subtle
shortcomings. With traffic cal@ng, an intentional and obvious constricted environment is
presented to incoming traffic in the attempt to reduce the comfort level of the driver and
increase alertness and reduce speed.
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 6 R-\Iau@@@te@@e-stu rh
There are indications that there may be an improvement in accident rate in some cases.
However, the low overall rost-effectiveness of this option, combined with possible problems
in emergency services and increased liability exposure, make it difficult for most authorities
to endorse the application of obstacles into the roadway environment as a worthwhile traffic
management device unless a very serious problem is documented.
F. Road Closures
None of the roadways within the Starlight Ridge tract meet the criteria for public street
closures as defined in the Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public
Streets.
Traffic volumes on a qualifying street segment must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day.
The highest daily volume recorded in this neighborhood was 1,688 on Cosmic Drive in
August of 1995. This value even seems suspiciously high since all other counts conducted
reflected approximately 1,200 vehicles a day on Cosmic Drive. Any street closure would also
create unreasonable traffic on streets impacted by diverted traffic. Public Safety agencies
have been contacted to discuss potential impacts of collector street closures within Starlight
Ridge. Their concerns can not be quantified without a specific project definition. Serious
issues of restricting certain areas from providing a secondary access option. The creation of
long, dead-end streets would negatively impact emergency services.
Another concern which should be anticipated with the closure option is the physical difficulty
of constructing adequate roadway geometry at the closure point. Most often, there is not
sufficient public right-of-way available to provide for a turnaround area on the terminated
street segment, requiring expensive land acquisitions.
G. Sidewalks
Our comprehensive field review of Starlight Ridge, reconfirmed the lack of sidewalks
throughout this residential tract. This information was first uncovered during the creation of
a suggested route to school map for Vail Elementary School. During the development of
school pedestrian routes by the Temecula Valley Unified School District, Police Department
and City staff-, Santa Cecilia Drive was established as the primary travel path for numerous
elementary school students.
As part of our yearly submittal for SB 821 pedestrian and bicycle facility grant funds, Santa
Cecilia was placed as number one among our 4 proposed improvements. We have been
approved for the 1995 grant cycle funding for a sidewalk along the entire length of Santa
Cecilia Drive fi7om Vail Elementary School (Nfira Loma Drive) to Cosmic Drive on the north
side. Design is complete and staff will be requesting award of a construction contract in the
near future.
Along many of the property frontages, residents have kept the I I foot parkways clear of
pedestrian obstructions. Staff recommends that the Homeowners Association support staffs
efforts to provide clear travel paths within the existing right-of-way along all internal streets
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 7 R:\Iaubcrm@wbte\@.stu rh
to encourage appropriate pedestrian behaviors. Staff will continue to support the education
of students regarding safe pedestrian activities.
H. Posting Speed Limits
A common belief is that posting a speed limit will influence drivers to drive at that speed. The
facts indicate otherwise.
Research conducted in many parts of this country over a span of several decades has shown
that drivers are influenced more by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing
traffic conditions than by the posted speed limit.
Califomia's Basic Speed Law requires that:
"No person shall drive a vehicle upon a high%W at a speed greater than is responsible or
prudent having due regardfor weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width
of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or
property. "
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is now 70 mph. All
other speed limits are called prima facie limits, which "on the face of it" are safe and prudent
under normal conditions. Certain pfim facie limits are established by law and include the 25
mph limit in business and residential districts, the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections
and blind railroad crossings and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are
going to and from school. The speeds are not always required to be posted, however, all
Cafifomia motorists are required to know the basic 15 mph, 25 mph, and the maximum speed
limit laws.
Intermediate speed limits between 25 mph and 70 mph, may be established by local authorities
on the basis of traffic engineering surveys. These surveys include an analysis of roadway
conditions, accident records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers. If speed limit signs
are posted for a lower limit than is needed to safely meet these conditions, many drivers will
simply ignore the signs. At the same time, other drivers will stay within the posted limits.
This generally increases the conflicts between faster and slower drives, reduces the gaps in
traffic though which crossings could be made safely and increase the difficulty for pedestrians
to judge the speed of approaching vehicles. Studies have shown that where uniformity of
speed is not maintained, accidents generally increase.
Starlight Ridge streets fit into three different roadway classifications as per the County of
Riverside Street Standards. Of the three different roadway sizes, two different speed limits
apply.
For those non-collector streets 40 feet wide or narrower, the 25 mph prima facie speed
applies. For those streets greater than 40 feet wide (Cosmic Drive, Santa Ceclia Drive,
Asteroid Way and portions of Mlky Way Drive and Agena Street) the basic speed law
applies. Appendix "C" contains sections of the California Vehicle Code that pertains to the
application of speed limits within the entire state. This appendix contains Section 515 which
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 8 R:\Ia@\9@@te\tm@.stu rh
defines a 'residence district', Section 22350 which defines the 'Basic Speed Law', Section
22352(b)(1) which qualifies the 25 mph speed limit in a residence district and Chapter 3,
Section 40802(b)(1) illegal evidence - speed trap restriction.
Based on these code sections, the above named streets do not meet the 25 mph prima facie
speed limit because they are greater than 40 feet wide; 44 feet to be exact.
Sections 22357 and 22358 authorize local authorities to establish prima facie speed Emits on
streets and roads under their jurisdiction, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
Speed limits should be established preferably at or near the 85 percentile speed, which is
defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. The 85 percentile
is often referred to as the critical speed. Speed limits higher than the 85 percentile are not
generally considered reasonable and safe and limits below the 85 percentile do not facilitate
the orderly movement of traffic. Speed Emits established on this basis conform to the
consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and safe, and are not
dependent on the judgement of one or a few individuals.
The basic speed law states that no person shall drive at a speed greater than is reasonable or
prudent. The majority of drivers comply with this law, and disregard regulations which they
consider unreasonable. It is only the top fiinge of drivers that are inclined to be reckless and
unreliable, or who have faultyjudgement and must be controlled by enforcement. Only when
roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily
apparent to drivers, are speed limits somewhat below the 85 percentile warranted.
Section 22358.5 of the Vehicle Code states that it is the intent of the Legislature that physical
conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition
readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special
downward speed zoning. Speed zones of less than half a mile and short transition zones
should be avoided.
Other factors that need to be considered are the most recent two-year accident record,
roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions,
profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics,
pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks, etc.
Speed Trap-Section 40802(b) provides that prima facie speed limits established under
Sections 22352(b)(1), 22354, 22357, 22358 and 22358.3, may not be enforced by radar
unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last
five years. An engineering and traffic survey is required where enforcement involves the use
of radar or other electronic speed measuring devices.
1. Enforcement
The enforcement of the rules of the road, or the threat of enforcement, has long been a most
effective tool in achieving reasonable driving practices. Although a point can be made that
law enforcement should be applied to other priorities, there are programs designed to
maximize the effectiveness of traffic law enforcement. Each community should apply these
Starlight Ridge Trafric Safety Study 9 P--@@te@.stu rh
Remove Existing Speed Limit signs
Install "STOP" sign ) t
Request BUSH Trimming
CAL
R( est TREE Trimming
Trimmin
Install "STOP" sign
Install "STOP"
Reque
Trimnu
Install "STOP" sig
VISTA
GENERAL REQUEST TO CLEAR THE EXITING PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN USE
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
EXHIBIT Ito it
techniques as effectively as possible, and address directly the minority of drivers which create
the vast majority of consternation in these sensitive neighborhood areas.
Speed limit enforcement in Starlight Ridge has been discussed numerous times with Temecula
Police Traffic Officers. All Starlight Ridge speed profiles have been forwarded to the
Temecula Police Department to be utilized in selecting specific enforcement times to
efficiently utilize their existing staff. The enforcement issue has previously been addressed
before the City Council by the Police Department.
J. Public Awareness Program
The backbone of staffs Public Awareness Program is our Radar Trailer Display Unit. This
piece of equipment is used to remind motorists of the legal speed limit and at the same time
display actual vehicle speeds. This has been an extension of law enforcement presence in
mostly residential areas. The placement of this equipment is handled by the Police
Department with input from the Department of Public Works. Staff is currently investigating
the purchase of a recording device that will greatly expand our current data collection efforts.
IV. Recommendations
The following reconunendations are for the entire Starlight Ridge neighborhood and the western end
of Santa Cecilia Drive.
A. StopNield Controls
Staff recommends the installation of the following minor street stops.
1.On Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive (2 signs with limit lines)
2.On Nebula Lane at Cosmic Drive (I sign with a limit line)
3 .On Cafino Place at Santa Cecilia Drive (I sign with limit line)
4.On Spica Court at Southern Cross Road (I sign and limit line for eastbound)
Staffdoes not recommend the creation of any all-way stops or the installation of any yield
signs. It is recommended that vegetation is trinuned at four (4) locations as shown on Exhibit
CCO5@ .
B. Striping Collector Streets
Staff does not recommend stfiping of any collector streets within Starlight Ridge. We are
open to the efforts of the community to pursue citizen approval and funding for the
improvement. The proper procedure is defined in the Policy for Closure or Modification of
Traffic Flow on Public Streets.
C. One-Way Streets
Staff does not recommend the creation of any one-way streets within Starlight Ridge. This
application does not lend itself to this area because of the lack of couplet streets.
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study I 0 F-"Uu@@@te\@.stu rh
D. Speed Undulations
Staff does not recommend the installation of any speed undulations based on applicable City
policy. None of these collector or local streets qualify.
E. Road Narrowing
Staff does not recommend narrowing any of the streets within Starlight Ridge because a
serious safety problem has not been documented.
F. Road Closures
Staff does not recommend closing any streets within this area. None of the area streets carry
enough traffic to be considered for a complete road closure per our approved policy.
G.Sidewalks
Staffsupports current efforts to construct a sidewalk on Santa Cecilia Drive from Cosmic
Driveto Mra Loma Drive. We also support efforts to clear the existing right-of-way of all
pedestrian obstruction in order to promote pedestrian travel outside of the paved roadway.
H. Posted Speed Limits
Staff recommends the removal of all 25 mph speed limit signs within this tract. Based on
roadway widths, these collector streets do not qualify as a residence district. The Police
Department has been informed of this new development.
Staff does not recommend conducting engineering and traffic studies to establish speed limits
within the tract, based on collision history and the relative short lengths of these roadways.
The basic speed law applies and is appropriate.
LEnforcement
Staffrecommends that the Police Department determine appropriate enforcement efforts
neededwithin this tract.
J.Public Awareness Program
Staffreconunends discontinuing the current Public Awareness Program which focusses on
collector streets. We will consider applying a similar effort for 25 mph roads if a speeding
concern is reported.
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study P--@@@te@.stu rh
In addition to these recommendations, staff will pursue:
I .Placing "25 mph School Zone" signs at all approaches to Vail Elementary School on
Mra Loma Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive.
2.Work with the citizens of Starlight Ridge to clear the public right-of-way of
obstructions in order to provide safe pedestrian links around Starlight Ridge.
Even though this list of improvements seem to mitigate all identified neighborhood short comings,
staff will be more than happy to work with the citizens of Starlight Ridge if they can document a 75%
approval to fully fund any appropriate traffic caln-dng strategy.+
Starlight Ridge Traffic Safety Study 12 R-\Ia@@@\@,sta rh
,KPPE DI)C
66)kl9
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:August 25, 1994
SUBJECT:Item 4
City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and comment on the draft Street Closure
or Modification Policy.
BACKGROUND:
Due to requests to have the Department of Public Works close or modify public streets, the
Traffic Division proposes to create a policy to guide public officials in order to ensure solutions
that are equatable for the entire community.
The State of California has preempted the field of traffic control (refer to Section 21 of the
California Vehicle Code), and no local authority is allowed to enact or enforce any ordinance
on the matters covered by the Vehicle Code unless expressly authorized by statute.
It is the policy of the State that all persons have an equal right to use the streets and
highways, and localities have no carte blanche and, absent express authority, may not
determine which traffic shall and which shall not use streets. Based upon this policy, in the
absence of specific State legislative authority to the contrary, a city may not restrict the right
to travel upon one of its streets to its residents or to other exempted drivers. Some examples
in the Vehicle Code of such specific authority to regulate travel upon streets are: if the City
Council determines the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic [ 21 1 01 (a)]; if needed
to implement the Circulation Element of a General Plan [ 21 1 01 (f)]; if due to criminal activity
[211-01.41; regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages [(a)]; and on streets
dividing school grounds to protect students attending such school or school grounds. When
a local agency decides to utilize the express delegation of such authority, the local agency
may only utilize 'office traffic control devices' authorized by the Vehicle Code. Additional,
local authorities may not place gates or other selective devices on any street which deny or
restrict the access of certain members of the public to the street, while permitting others
unrestricted access to the street.
PURPOSE OF POLICY
Consistent with State law and policy, it is the general policy of the City to not allow temporary
or permanent closure of any public street to vehicular traffic. Requests for closure or
modification of traffic flow on a public street will be considered, however, based on a petition
which meets all the criteria and procedures outlined in the attached policy. The City will
carefully review each street closure or traffic flow modification request to ensure that the
proposed location and attending circumstances meet all the criteria outlined in our policy and
in State law described above. The purpose of this policy is to set forth the process and
r. \ag@k%%0825/ajp
criteria by which modification of traffic flow or closure of public streets may be considered by
the City Council and to identify the conditions under which closures or modifications may be
enacted. This policy only applies to the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets
initiated by citizens. This policy will not apply to the closure or modification of traffic flow on
public streets initiated by the City to address specific traffic safety issues or to comply with
State and Federal standards and warrants. This policy also will not apply to temporary
changes in traffic that are needed to stage special events in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
1.Draft Street Closure or Modification Policy
2.Appendix 'A'
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AUGUST 25,1994
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Perry
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero
4.City of Temecula - Street Closure or Modification Policy
Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report regarding the draft Street
Closure or Modification Policy.
Commissioner Sanders inquired if the policy referred to only residential streets.
Traffic Engineer Lauber responded that residential streets are referred to as 'local
streets' in the policy criteria.
It was the Commissions recommendation to continue this item off calendar, to allow
staff to do further research, receive additional input, and to bring back to the
Commission at a later date.
Chairman Perry called for a recess at 9:50 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:55 p.m.
5.Traffic Engineer's Report
Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber repwed on the following:
Pala Road/SR 79(S) Right Turn Lane - Caltrans coordination, received one bid
which was over the engineers estimate, staff to recommend to City Council to
reject bid and to re-advertise.
Contacted Greyhound Bus Line Service - One stop in Temecula located on
Jefferson Avenue at McDonaids.
Contacted representative for RTA regarding Future Route Change Workshop on
September 1 3, 1994. A representative will attend the workshop and provide
their current schedule for the Temecula area.
Contacted three shopping centers, two centers provided exhibits showing their
on-site bus sites.
Reviewed upcoming meeting dates, Commissioners Coe, Guerriero, Johnson
and Perry will be attending the Traffic Commissioners Workshop, October 1 5,
1994 at Cal Poly, Pomona.
3 r\@ic\comxnissn\.ininutcm\0825.@sip
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:September 22, 1994
SUBJECT:Item 4
Street Closure/Modification Policy
RECOATION:
Ilat the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the attached "City of
Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets'.
BACKGROUND:
This policy was previously presented to the Commission in draft form for review and comment. A few
items were discussed and requested to be incorporated into a fmal draft to be brought back for
Commission approval. The Traffic Division recommended that specific wording changes be submitted
prior to September 13, 1994 for incorporation, providing staff with clear direction. Commissioner
Guerriero was contacted to solicit input since he was absent from the Commission meeting of August 25,
1994.
The attached document, "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public
Streets", identifies staff's effort to include all items discussed at our meeting because no written changes
were received.
FISCAL IWACT:
None
Attachments:
City of Temecula Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 22,1994
Co-Chairman Sander declared a recess at 8:25 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 p.m.
3.Speed Limit - Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Calle Medusa
Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the staff report. Based on a survey of over
300 vehicles, 54 mph was the average speed. Based on this survey Mr. Lauber
recommended that the speed limit be set at 50 mph.
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to accept staff
recommendation to set the speed limit to 50 mph, and recommend that staff look into
installing a "Pavement End" or appropriate sign close to the intersection of Calle Medusa and
Nicolas Road.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Guerriero
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry
4.Street Closure/Modification Policy
Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber presented the "City of Temecula Policy for Closure or
Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets' in its original form with changes noted
in strike-out form.
Mr. Lauber also stated he is also w@king to update the travel forecast model for the
City, and incorporate some streets in that system. If it can be funded it will be
presented as a mini work station, the closest facility is in Riverside.
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero that staff refer
the Street Closure/Modification Policy to the City Attorney for review and comment as to its
application as a general release document, and to make the document consistent by using the
word "Property Owner" in place of "residents or long term renters".
It was further directed that after review by the City Attorney the policy is to go directly to the
City Council with copies to the Commission.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Sanders, Guerriero
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry
3 r\@ic\commiaan\minutes\0922.@ajp
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission
F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:April 27, 1995
SUBJECT:Itein 5
'Stop" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way
RECOATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the installation of 'Stop' controls on Milky Way
Drive at Asteroid Way.
BACKGROUND:
Ile Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. 7le
major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge do not have any
controls.
Most of the intersections without controls are local street 'T' intersections. At these intersections,
motorists are required to yield to traffic if they are approaching on the steam of the 'T'. There -is a
provision in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) which regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW)
at all "T' intersections.
'ne intersection of Milky Way Drive and Asteroid Way currently forms a four (4) way intersection
without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven (7) conditions which
indicate the possible need for stop controls. These warrants are listed below.
0 Warrants for STOP Signs
Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only
where warranted. 'A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the
following conditions exist:
I .On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the
normal right of way rule is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to
correction by STOP signs.
2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway.
3.At the intersection of two main highways. The highway traffic to be stopped depends on
approach speeds, volumes, and turning movements.
4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street.
5.On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per
hour.
6.At an unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
7.At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident
record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign.
lnm&k95XO427/aip
Staff has reviewed all conditions and found number 5 to apply to Milky Way Drive when approaching
Asteroid Way. lberefbre staff recommends placing 'Stop' signs with @t lines on Milky Way Drive
at Asteroid Way.
FISCAL BWACT:
2 'Stop' Signs with
Limit Lines at $150 each $300
Attachment-
L,oc,ation Map
\ag@N9S\0427/ajp
CHURC14ILL
LOHG
IREMORA ST
ùCAPRICE CT
3CANDIDA DR
CA.'ONDA
PL
PO
F-)( I -ST 1 t4 C>. 516- N A L, I ZE t)0EX% STI Cr :5-rOF' SI(,"
IWTF-P- 5 I- c -Fioti L-0 C AT-(Oro!S
L-(l c A -I- I 0 tJS
PUBLICITRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 27, 1995
Commissioner Sander spoke in favor of the School District's expansion
of their existing parking facility.
Commissioner Johnson asked staff if an ordinance was in force regarding
the street sweeping schedule. Engineer Lauber responded that no
ordinance existed, however, he will investigate this with Public Works
and respond back to the Commission.
The motion was made by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by
Commissioner Perry to table action on this item for 30 days in order to
give the school district time to educate the students to park in the
expanded parking facility. The Commission will review this item and if
approved, the "no parking' time limit will be 7:00 A.M. to 1 1:00 A.M.
The motion carried as follows:
A-YES: COMMISSIONERS: 4 Johnson, Sander,
Guerriero, Perry
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 0 None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 Co e
Chairman Johnson called a 9 minute recess.
The meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission was reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
Chairman Johnson presiding.
5."Stol2" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way
Engineer Lauber reported on correspondence received from residents in
Starlight Ri dge regarding traffic problems at the intersection of Milky
Way Drive and Asteroid Way. Engineer Lauber stated that traffic warrant
No. 5 exists and staff recommends approval.
It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner
Guerriero to recommend to City Council that "Stop" controls on Milky
Way Driver and Asteroid Way be installed.
inutes.Pts\042795 4
AGENDA REPORT
'ro:Publicl'rmffic Safety Commission
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:June 22, 1995
SUBJECT:Itein 2
Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive
RECO NDATION:
'Mat the Publicfrraffic Safety Commission approve the installation of stop controls on Agena Street at
Santa Cecilia Drive.
BACKGROUND:
Ile Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. Ile
major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge do not have any
controls. More specifically, the Traffic Division was asked to evaluate the intersections of, Santa Cecilia
Drive, Agena Street, Cosmic Drive and Asteroid Way.
Three (3) of these intersections are local street 'T' intersections. At these intersections, motorists are
required to yield to traffic if they are approaching on the steam of the 'T'. There is a provision in the
California Vehicle Code (CVC) which regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW) at all 'T'
intersections. If sight distance limitations exist, the posting of stop or yield signs are advised. All three
(3) intersections have good approach visibility.
'ne intersection of Agena Street and Santa Cecilia Drive currently forms a four (4) way intersection
without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven (7) conditions which
indicate the possible need for stop controls. These warrants are listed below.
0Warrants for MP Signs
Because the STOP sign causes a substantial inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only
where warranted. A STOP sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the
following conditions exists:
I . On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where application of the
normal right of way rule, is unduly hazardous as evidenced by accidents susceptible to
coff ection by STOP signs.
2.On a county road or city street at its intersection with a state highway.
3.At the intersection of two main highways. Ile highway traffic to be stopped depends on
approach speeds, volumes, and turning movements.
4.On a street entering a legally established through highway or street.
r.\@ \sg@k95NO622/ajp
5.On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than 10 miles per
hour.
6.At an unsi@ed intersection in a signalized area.
7.At other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and accident record
indicates a need for control by the STOP sign.
Staff has reviewed all conditions and found number 5 to apply to Agena Street when approaching Santa
Cecflia Drive. 'rberefore staff recommends placing 'Stop' signs with limit lines on Agena Street at Santa
Cecilia Drive.
FISCAL @ACT:
2 - "Stop' Signs with
Limit Lines at $150 each $300
Attachment:
Location Map
%n@-@95%06ZUajp
ci
vi
2
ul
0
n
IRA w Ul
'2
UJ
%A
:z
LU
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 22, 1995
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2.Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive
Director Joe Kicak, acting in the absence of Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, reported on a
concern brought before the City Council in. support of stop-. controls on Agena- Street.
Staff recommends approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, representing Starlight Ridge Home Owners
Association spoke in support of stop controls or signals in the area. He reported on
concerns for safety in the neighborhood by distributing additional background including
speed reports.
Commissioner Guerriero recommended a speed undulation program alternative. He would
like this item on the next meeting agenda. He requested staff provide policy
documentation to the Commission.
Commissioner Perry responded that all residents would need to approve speed bumps
and recommended the representatives contact everyone in the community.
Commissioner Perry also asked if stop signs could be installed on Cosmic Drive instead of
Santa Cecilia Drive.
Director Kicak responded that this would not help and the lo cation needs to be
warranted. Staff will conduct volume an@ speed studies. Lieutenant Domenoe will
research the enforcement in the area.
Commissioner Guerriero requested that a study of alternatives be presented to the
Commission within 30 days.
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, President of Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association,
spoke with concern for safety in the area and would like to see a 4-way stop at Agena
Street and Cosmic Drive and Agena Street and Santa Cecilia Drive. The home owners will
try anything even speed bumps.
Commissioner Coe requested staff look into this further.
It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Perry to table
the Stop Controls agenda item and bring it back to the Commission when the survey is
completed.
Minutes.Pts%062295 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission
F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:August 24, 1995
CT:Item 4
Starlight Ridge Traffic Study
RECO ATION:
1.Ilat the Temecula Police Department implement a plan of consistent speed enforcement, and
the Department of Public Works regularly schedule the Radar Trafler Display unit for Asteroid
Way, Cosmic Drive, Agena Street, Santa Cecilia Drive and Southern Cross Road.
2.That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the installation of stop controls on Agena
Street at Santa Cecilia Drive.
BACKGROUND:
At the June 22, 1995 meeting of this Commission, staff brought forward a recommendation to place stop
controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive (agenda report attached). After the staff report by Joseph
Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, the item was opened for public comment. Ken
Bruclanan representing the Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association presented the Commission with
additional information which is attached. Although his memo covered a lot of issues, the four (4)
predominant traffic issues were:
I . The main roadway in Starlight Ridge are being used as a short cut.
2.Vehicle speeds are a problem.
3.The existing vehicle volumes are a problem.
4. Request to extend Moraga Road through to Mira Loma Drive'.
I would like to respond to each of these concerns separately and then present our recommendations for
the entire area.
1.In order to determine the exact number of cut-through traffic for the Starlight Ridge area,
although not impossible, it would take a major effort completely out of the scope that could be
provided by current City staff. To gage the overall roadway use compared with street capacity,
estimated trip generation was calculated. Each single family resident is forecasted to generate
approximately ten (10) trips per day.
Staff has counted only single family residence in Starlight Ridge and came up with
approximately 570 homes. Using this number, we can estimate that these homes could generate
about 5,700 trips per day without including the apartments on the far east and west ends of the
study area. If our counters only registered 50% of all internally generated trips Oocal not cut-
through) we would have registered 2,850 vehicles per day. As shown in Table "A', we counted
2,963 vehicles per day. On a real general basis, this seems to indicate no or very little short-cut
*="N95%0824/ajp
traffic not generated within Starlight Ridge. All public streets are provided for anyone to use
on whatever paths they select.
H.Speeds were collected on the five (5) local collector streets shown on Exhibit 'A' location map.
Table 'A' identifies each of the associated critical speeds (85th percentile) surveyed by direction.
For an area with a residential prima facia speed limit of 25 MPH, our survey was disheartening.
Since our data collection effort in 1994, both Police Department and Public Works have made
an effort to reduce speeds on Cosmic Drive specifically. Staff has posted the residential speed
limit of 25 MPH on Cosmic Drive and requested police enforcement. We. have recently located
the Radar Trailer Display unit on Cosmic Drive to gage its effectiveness on speed when
surveyed a week later. Police enforcement was asked to stay away from this area from July 21,
1995 so it would not influence results. Table 'B' shows the collision history for this area.
]III.Directional 24 hour volumes are also shown on Table 'A' for all roadways. All streets in this
area indicate exceptional low volumes except Cosmic Drive. Ile 1,017 car per day on Cosmic
Drive reflects about 15% below the 1,200 cars a day indicating acceptable roadway service
levels.
IV.Based on existing developments and the circulation element of the City's General Plan, the
extension of Moraga Road from Rancho California Road to Mira Loma Drive is not in our
future. The existing topograph would also be a major obstacles.
As requested by Commissioner Guerriero, the City's Speed Undulation Policy is attached. Since the
required traffic volumes are not reached for any of our subject streets, these roadways would not be
eligible for implementation of speed undulations. Other factors such as roadway widths and grades could
also disqualify these streets and have not been evaluated.
Based on the reduction in speeds on Cosmic Drive over the past year, staff recommends implementing
a program of consistent speed enforcement, a regular schedule of placing the City's Radar Trailer Display
unit on all five (5) subject streets. We also recommend posting stop controls on Agena Street at Santa
Cecilia Drive.
FISCAL @ACT:
2 - Stop Signs with Limit Lines
0$150'.00 each = $300.00
Attachments:
Table "A' - Travel Flow Data
Table 'B' - Collision History
Exhibit 'A' - Location Map
June 22, 1995 Public/Traffic Safety Agenda Report
Memo from Ken Bruckman
Speed Undulation Policy
*@k95XOB24/ajp
TAIRIX "All
TRAVEL FLOW DATA
STARLIGHT REDGE SUBDIVISION
.LOCATION@@@@ @:@EKDAY,VOL CAL COUNTS
@@@24 @Hour::Coijnts):@:@"@ .@@6/94@@ 8/95
ASTEROID WAY 358 Vehicles
Northbound 140 Vehicles 40 MPH
Southbound 218 Vehicles 36 MPH
COSMIC DRIVE 1,017 Vehicles 38 MPH
Northbound 486 Vehicles 33 MPH
Southbound 531 Vehicles 32 MPH
SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 778 Vehicles 33 MPH
Northbound 377 Vehicles 38 MPH
Southbound 401 Vehicles 36 MPH
AGENA STREET 277 Vehicles
Eastbound 138 Vehicles 43 MPH
Westbound 139 Vehicles 31 MPH
RN CROSS ROAD 533 Vehicles
Eastbound 251 Vehicles 33 MPH
Westbound 282 Vehicles 36 MPH
TOTAL 2,963 Vehicles Average 35.8 MEPH
r. \tmfric\commimn\agenda\95\tmffiow. @0824 /sip
TABLE "B"
COLI.JSION HISTORY
STARLIGHT R]IDGE SUBDWEION
1993 1994 1995*
AGENA.ST'REET 0 0 0 I 0 0 0
ASTEROID WAY 0 0 0 0 0 0
COSMIC DRIVE 0 1 1 0 0 0
SANTA CECILIA DRIVE 0 0 0 0 0 1
SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD 0 0 0 0 1 0
PDO INJURY PDO INJURY PDO INJURY
1-1-95 through 3-31-95
PDO - Property Damage Only
CHURCIIILL
@ON.Q
DR
MIL
1REMORA ST
2CAPRICE CT
3CANDIDA OR
Al AL.PHA
VIRGO
CA ONDA CT
CH 0
2
If
@)<V4 IS
LAN P RI MAVERA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:September 28, 1995
SUBJECT:Item 3
Starlight Ridge - Speed Reduction Efforts
RECO ATION:
Receive and file the project update..
BACKGROUND:
'Me subject of residential speed control has for years been a popular topic at many Public/Traffic Safety
Commission meetings. In the past staff has relied upon the substantiation of trouble locations by first
receiving community input and then collecting actual vehicle speed counts. In most areas the speed
profile revealed a moderate speed profile (slightly more than 15% of vehicles traveling over 25 MPH),
which required minimal attention.
In the Starlight Ridge neighborhood our data revealed a different picture. Due to the elevated speed
profile which grossly exceeded the speed limit, staff recommended, with Commission support, an
accelerated police enforcement effort based on actual speed plot information fbr every 15 minute period
of the day. This coupled with the implementation of the Radar Trailer Display Unit, has not satisfied
the residents and/or the Commission. The very last direction from this Commission included the re-
checking of 'Stop" sign warrants at locations that have already been found to be providing appropriate
assigrunent of right-of-way. Further action was requested.
This report contains three articles which describe procedures for elevated neighborhood speed controlling
measures called traffic calming. These articles should provide enough information to open discussion on
the possibility of using traffic calming techniques again in Temecula.
Staff has plans to present the Commissions approved 'Street Closure/Modification' policy to City Council
as the guidelines for processing those types of citizen request. 'Me proposed policy has all of the
requirements needed to handle these issues now that the City has an adopted appeal process. Once the
City Council provides staff with support of the new policy, we can begin the full scale community
involvement needed to ensure success of any cooperative effort to reduce vehicular speeding.
FISCAL IWACT:
None
Attachment:
1.I.T.E. Journal Article - Suburban Residential Traffic Calming (Sept. 1995)
2.I.T.E. Traffic Engineer Handbook - Transportation Functions of Streets
3.A.A.A. Neighborhood Traffic Management Programs
4.Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
\agm&\95\OM/aip
.Suburban Residenfial
Traffic Calming
BY C. EDWARD WALTER
calmine or slowing is frequently
r,Ced to a.-s reverse traf6c engineer-
ing. Instead of easing and speeding @c
flow, traffic calming uses geometric
chanl,es or desims that passively regulate
travel speed. Europeans take traffic
calming vern, seriously: In residential
areas they tr@, for 20 miles per hour
(mph) speeds to reduce injury severity.
In commercial areas, where there are
shared traffic zones between vehicles and
pedestrians, they strive to achieve speeds
of 10 mph to 15 mph. Traffic calming
measures are Generally retrofitted onto
existing streets. However, having once
recognized the need for traffic calming,
these ideas have led to new hierarchies of
residential street classifications and
n--- EnL
desizn principles i land and
Australia.'
In the Washinszton, D.C.-Baltimore,
Md., suburban areas, postwar residential
development frequently was modeled
along! the Columbia. Md., residential plan
of long curvina residential streets with
numerous cul-de-sacs. Theie nonlinear
street plans have led to longer trip
len@. At the same time these new resi-
dential patterns were developing, local
governments developed minimum design
standards setting width, curvature and
frec;uendv vertical izrades based on street
C. Edward
Walter is Chief of
the Traffic Engi-
neering Division
.fo r Howard
Counti-, Maryland
He is a graduate of
Cornell Universiti, and has a master's
degree from MIT He is a Meniber ofITE.
44 - ITE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995
classification. in Howard County, to reduce speed in suburban residential
Maryland, which hes between Baltimore communities. This article presents the
and Washington, a 35 mph design speed results of that efforl
was used for residential streets with a
30 ft to 36 ft roadway width. Frequently Vertical Alignment
2,4CO-ft to 3,@ft long cul-de-sw streets Modification
were approved: it is little wonder that
despite 25 mph speed limits, 85th per- Vertical changes to roadwav geome-
centile speeds of 38 mph to 40 mph are try offer guaranteed speed reduction.'
routine in such residential areas. Speed humps, developed in England and
Residential speeding is a major com- sometimes referred to as "insomniac
mu@ concern. Speeding has become a policemen," control speed by adjusting
wav of life for many-, although residents the i2eight and spacing of the hump. They
may pass their own property within the introduce a vertical acceleration factor to
speed limit, they have no hesitation 'in the vehicle. The Watt's Profile Speed
zipping past their neighbors' property as Hump, as developed in England, is a poT-
fast as possible. Police with limited tion of a 12 ft4ong cylinder rising 3 inches
resources undertake periodic enforce- (in) in height (see Figure 1). In 1990,
t
ment on request, but such enforcemen Howard County placed seven of these
efforts are sporty at best. These situations humps on Baltimore Avenue near
have given rise to the development and Laurel, Md. The 85th percentile speed
success of traffic
calming measures in
existing residential
neighborhoods.
Traffic engineers
in the metropolitan
counties surrounding
Baltimore and
Washington have
formed the Marviand
Traffic Engineers
Council to solve joint
problems. Several of
the jurisdicuons have
been working with
community groups
on traffic calming
measures. In 1992,
the council formed a
traffic calming sub-
COMMiEtee to share
information on Aays
SPEED SPEED NUMP
SUMP
RELATIVE DirrEqrNcr BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL WEED SUMPS -NO ME- SPEED HU.P$.
SIG.E.T 01 C.CLL
WAT?S TYPE HUMP CROSS SEC'Not
FLAT TOP, HUMP CROSS SECTION
Figure 1. Speed hump.
NO. -OUNTABLE-
Cu$16 a GUTTER CURS &CUTTER
00 OR
D a -Ir-C.
Figure 2. Traffic circle.
before placement was 38 mph and the speed limit 25 mph.
Immediatel%, aftervard (and continuing to the present day), 85th
percentile speeds. were 27 mph to 29 mph between humps and
15 mph at each hump. The series of humps replaced two multi-
wav stops and had the concurrence of 75 percent of residents.
-nere have been no accidents in the four vears since the humps
were placed vs. four accidents in the two vears immediately
before hump construction.
A vear later Howard Countv placed four humps on
Dogwood Drive, a narrow residential street between two art@-
aJ roadwavs. The 85th percentile speed before construction of
the humps was 40 mph: after construction. it dropped to 28 mph.
There also has been a 24 percent reduction in traffic volumes on
DoLywood Drive as vehicles diverted to other routes.
The Watt's Profile Speed Hump frequently has been limited
in its application to roadwavs with 3.000 vehicles per dav (vpd)
or fewer. although Dallas permits its use on streets handling up
Eg
'ty$'ICAL
SIGNAGE
Figure 3. Roundabout.
46 - ITE JOURNAL - SEPTEMBER 1995
to 8.000 vpd.3 A flat top speed hump7@-ft long with a center 10-ft
flat section was pioneered in the United States b%, Seminole
Count),, Florida.' where it has been used on collector roads with
more than I2.000 vpd. In Enciand. flat top humps are used on coi-
iector roads and also frequently serve as pedestrian crossings.
Two flat top humps were installed in 1993 on Shaker Drive in
Howard Countv. where the 85th percentile speed was reduced
from 43 mph to 29 mph. Remarkabiv. the speed between humps
a nd at humps are essentially the same. (Seminole Counrv found
similar operating experience.) 'rhis characteristic has led to its
adoption in Howard Counrv as the preferred hump desil-n.
The Cirv of College Park. Md.. reccntiv completed construction
of four @ pedesmw crossings as part of a road rehabilitation.
The cross section is s@ar to a flat top speed hump with a -'--in
rise. The cirv added visual impact to the crossings b%, constructing
the flat top portion with concrete and bnck.
The Institute of Transportation Engineers has published a pro-
posed recommended practice on speed humps. It was prepared bv
the T@cal Council Speed Humps Task Force. which is current'-
ly evaluating comments before a @ decision on adoption.5
Horizontal Alignme I nt Changes
Tr2ffic Circles 2nd Roundabouts
The City of Seattle, Wash., pioneered the L:.S. concept of
Ailing small mffic circles in existing intersections to slow traffic
through residential areas. From a small beginning in 1978, Seattle
has now constructed more than 800 traffic circles on residential
streets.* Their pioneering experience has been adopted elsewhere,
including suburban Maryland counties. Traffic circles have been
installed in @land as both temporary and permanent instaba-
tions. Some of @ temporary insta.Uatir-ns have been redesigned as
permanent ones and some have been removed at the request of
residents. Anne Arundel and Montgomery counties have each
instadied several circles (see Fieure 2).
The success of @c circles in reducing residential travel speeds
is related to the amount of horizontal deflection required as a vehi-
cle moves around the circle.'Both Anne Arundel and Montgomery
counties have desiened considerable deflection in their circles,
effectively prohibiting intersection traffic from traveling more than
18 mph to 20 mph. Operationally. side roads stop for traffic on the
main route. Most left-tuming cars will make a 270-degree turn
arotmd the circle. Some of the circles have been constructed with a
mountable curb and 4 ft concrete ring to accommodate trucks.
How ever. large trucks cannot operate within the turning radius of
the circles and therefore make left turns in front of the circle. This
could be considered a dangerous practice except volumes are lo%%,
and the circles are desiened with good visibility,.
Because of the problem of trucks tumine in front of the circles.
Prince Georges County has constructed several roundabouts.
Roundabouts are similar to traffic circles but have splitter islands
that effectively prevent trucks from turning in front of the circle.,
Generaliv the islands are formed with concrete or asphalt curb.
but occasionally they are painted (see Figure 3). Operationaliv.
traffic entering a roundabout vields to traffic in the circle. and
there is no major roadiminor'road consideration as at normal
intersections. Roundabouts larpe enough to accommodate trucks
mus t have a total inscribed di-ameter -of approximately 100 feet
(ft). This is frequently difficult to achieve in residential intersec-
tions without acquiring additional riizht-of-wav.
Both roundabouts and traffic circles are ver-v effective as inter-
section traffic calmino devices. Thev have been' used with consid-
crable success in Monteomer%- Co'unt%, for isolated intersection
caiming, where 85th percentile speeds have been reduced from
more than 40 mph to 20-21- mph. Alone a residential route thev
must be repeated at reeular intervals to maintain "calm- traffic
speeds throughout. Circles have also been constructed between
intersections to calm traffic.
Roadway Restrictions
Roadwav restrictions can also be effective traffic calming
devices. Ma'nv residential streets are considerably wider than
required. On such streets. cars parked opposite each other in mid-
block act as a temporary roadwav restriction. @ phenomenon
can be created bv consuucnng pedestrian peninsulas at intersec-
tions or chokers at mid-block (see Figure 4). The pavement width
between chokers can be built for one traffic lane or two. Ukewise
the resenction can'be either parallel to the travel way or twisted to
the direction of travel (see Figure 5. next page). Downtown
Market Street in York. Pa.. is an excellent example of a one-wav
street narrowed to two lanes with a twist introduced at each end of
a long block in order to reduce travel speeds.
Medians also can be used for road narrowings. Medians 20 ft to
50 ft or more in length have been constructed in Anne Arundet
Counrv in advance of intersections. Roadway widths each side of
the medians are 11 fL However, unless cars regularly park along
the street, median consuuction by itself does little to ;@uce traffic
speed. To compensate for this. Anne Arundel County is construct-
ing small bulb-outs (peninsula projections into the roadway) to
force drivers to make a lateral deflection as they approach and
enter median-calmed area. Studies indicate that islands have
reduced 85th percentile speeds bv 2 mph to 5 mph. Islands without
lateral deflection have the least speed reduction.
30 36'
-EA 0 L"TABLE CURS
MAISEO REFLECTI@E
ft@EME.T ..RKERS
VVhere are your high accident locations?
Intersection MagicO @arL-
can ta you that, plus:
Customized collision diagrams
Charts on Time of Day, DUI, Type of
collision, etc. Any user criteria!
Frequency reports, accident
lists, custom reports, etc.
GIS compafible output
A V' MS Windows- compatible ramming
For informaton, contact Pd' Programming. Inc., or ask your current consulting engineer about Intersection MagicO.
Quesfions may also be directed to H@ & CrobiN Mc These Los Ang@es area consulfing traffic engineers have teamed
up with Pd' Programming. Inc. Working togetw, we can help you wnh all your traffic engineering needs. U14) 731-9455
V4c@TiT*M on got*)
JEEFE
I.00
L
Figure 4. Parallel choker.
A variation on roadway restrictions has been constructed at
two Prince Georges County intersections. where offset small
medians force vehicles to go through a lateral deflection in one
direction of travel only. In the next block a similar median
forces siniiiar deflection for the other direction of traffic.
Both Anne Arundel and Howard counties have painted
ITE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995 - 47
'30 - 36'
WHITE
VPAVEMENT
MADKING
Iz
.01\
u
z
z
lw
Z
4
8D
Figure Twisted choker.
ICE
WARNING
SYSTEM *IC
A tool for the road rhaintenance services
The 4 EDS components:
Active pavement sensor
Roadside weather station
Data acquisition software
Pagers
0Precise determination of
the freezing temperature
0Reliable determination of the road surface
condition using a single transducer
0Continuous prediction of the time of
ice formation
0Direct road surface information and alarm
transmission through wireless pagers
@br eter
USA VIBRO-METER Corp.
489 Devon Park Drive # 310 Wayne, PA 19087
- Phone: (610) 688 3700 Fax: (610).688 3714
48 iTE JOURNAL- SEPTEMBER 1995
parkine lane lines without cenleriine stripine on residential
streets. This visual]%- narroa,s the available roadA-a%, and has
r esultcd in reductions of 3 mph to 4 mph in vehicle travel. This
narrowing can be reinforced with several pedestrian peninsulas
and speed humps. Such combinations of traffic calmine mea-
sures are used extenstvei%, in Europe to achieve desires speed
reductions.
Traffic Calming Criteria
Tentative criteria have been developed 2overninE! the instal-
iation of traffic calminp devices. Roadwavs considered tor trai-
fic calmin must be p=ariiv residential StTeeES A'ith a majontn
of residential homes and driveways frontinp on the street.
Existing 85th percentile speeds mus t be 10 mph or more above
the speed limit and there must be 1.000 vpd or more usine the
residential street. Each of the metropolitan jurisdictions stud@-
traffic calmin2 measures after neighborhood complaints. The\-
then work wi@h the community to quaneifv and define the r)rob-
lem. and specific recommendations are made to the communit\-.
Marviand has found resident acceptance is paramount. and is
best facilitated by workin2 with a traffic committee from the
community. which can then sell the project to the communit,%, at
laree. Howard Countv requires 60 percent of residents to
approve recommendations by petition before construction.
Conclusions
Traffic calming can be an effective means of reducing speeds
in established residential neighborhoods. Speeding generally
occurs alone the entire length of a streCL may extend over sev-
erai streets. and requires the regular repetition of traffic @ng
measures. The specific measures to be used for =ffic calming
are determined bv roadwav characteristics. cost restraints and
resident acceptance. Speed reductions ranong from 3 mph to
24 mph have been obtained depending on the specific traffic
cairriinp- devices utilized. ResEular repetition of calming devices
at 400 @ to 600 ft intervals is required to maintain slower speeds
along the leneeh of a street.
References
1.Green Street Joint Venture. Australian Model Code for
Residential Development. Canberra. Australia: Department of
lndustr-%,. Technology and Commerce. No%,. 1990.
2.Devon CouniN, Council. Traffic Calming Giiidelines. Great
Britain: Devon Count-,, Council. 1991. pp. 2&-31.
of Dallas. Department of Transportation. Road Hiimp
3. Cit.
Design. Dallas. Texas: Citv of Dallas. Department of
Transportation. P. 2.
4.Nicodemus. David A. -Safe and Effective Roadwav Humps. The
Seminole Countv Profile.- ITE Con?penditim'of Technical
Papers. Washineton. D.C.: Institute of Transportation Entincers.
1991.pp.102-105.
5.Institutc of Transportation Enstineers. Gititieliiie.@ for the Design
(and Application of Speed Hitnips. A Proliosed Recomniended
Practice. Washineion. D.C.: institute of Transportation
Eneincers. March 1993.
6.Todd. Kenneth. "A Histor%- of Roundabouts in the United Statcs
and France." Traiisi)(;rtatioti Qjiarteri.i- 2(4). Oct. 19F8. p. 61 1.
7-Austroads. Gitide tip Traffic Eirgiiieeritiiz Practicc. Roioijdahoitis.
S%-dne%. Australia: Austroads. 1993. pp. 19-'-7.
8-Austr'oad!,. Cifide to Tra.fric Eiigi)jccritig Practice. Roiii2dabojizs.
Svdnev. Australia: Austroads. 1993. pp.
4.Conflict between the public aeencies that manage and
maintain streets and protect neighborhoods (such as pub-
lic works. police. and fire services) and the neighbors.
3.Conflicts among the professionals who plan. design. and
manage streets. chiefiv between engineers and designers.
Transportation functions of streets
Streets perform two transportation functions: provision
of access to individual parcels of land and provision of an
infrastructure for moi,ement between various origins and
destinations.
"Access' can be interpreted to include the existence of
driveways connecting the street with private propertv and
the availability of parts of the street for parking and loading.
"Movcmen t- comprises both the capaciii- to move quanti-
ties of vehicles or people and the abilitv to do so at a reason-
abiv high speed.
Although residents frequently perceive access as a func-
tion that primarily serves those within the neighborhood and
movement as one that primarily serves those outside the
neighborhood. in actuality both functions are necessary to -
both classes of users. since travel (movement) invariably in-
volves departure and arrival (access) from an origin and to a
destination.
Design standards. Agencies in many nations and states
have developed design standards for streets. Such standards
generally emphasize safe and efficient vehicle operation but
mav be silent on the relationship of street use to abutting land
developments and its users: it general lv is assumed that other
regulations (such as zoning and building codes) will address
these concerns. Thus. although thev mav make provision for
minimizing vehicle conflicts and vehicle-pedestrian con-
flicts (e.g., offset intersections, continuous sidewalks, etc.),
the standards in current use in manv jurisdictions do not ef-
fectiveiv address the potential for conflicts between needs for
residential access and amenities and the needs for traffic
movement into and bevond a given neighborhood.
Manv neighborhoods also predate current standards. and
their streets mav have other design problems. such as inade-
quate drivewav spacing, limited setback and space for off-
street parking, a "grid" pattern of streets that facilitates the
incursion of through traffic and that mav result in vehicular
conflicts and speeds that are unsuitable for the neighborhood.
Another concern is that design standards usualiv arc ap-
plied at the level of a subdivision or local jurisdiction. at least
in the United States. There are man%- cases in which adjacent
jurisdic,lons fail to coordinate their networks. and streets
,-,range designation and -haracter as thev cross urisdictional
boundaries.
Residential traffic controls. Local residential streets
should be protected from through traffic. Residential
356 @-ra'ti-- @-r.@ineerirg.-ianC:ZOOK
streets should be linked to traffic-carr-,Itng streets in a %4-a%
that simultaneously provides good access to other parts Of
the community and minimizes the chance of the residential
streets' use bv through traffic. These goals should be a part
of the planning for new residential areas. In some communi-
ties. these objectives have been achieved in older neighbor-
hoods (in Monteomerv Countv. Marviand: Berkeiev and
Richmond in California: Seattle. Washineton: and othe-
locations) through the installation of traffic diverters and
barriers.
Residential streets should also be protected from vehic-
ular traffic moving at excessive speed (greater than 25 to
30 mpb) and from parking unrelated to residential activi-
ties. Figure 1 1-8 illustrates several types of treatments that
are designed to reduce speed and discourage through traf-
Fic at minor intersections in residential areas.
A varietv of treatments has been devised to accomplish the
above o'ojectives-ranging from speed 'hump5' and -chok-
ers' for speed control to the Dutch 'Woonerf - concept. which
Figure 114. Treatment of minor intersections in residcn-
tiaj areas to reduce speed and discourage through traff ic.
SOURCE: W-S. HomBUItGER AND J.H. KELL. Fundamentals
of Traffic Engineering. [2th edition. Universitv of Califor-
nia. Institute of Transportation Studies. Berkeley, 1988,
p. '-)O-7.
r--,
c
D
L__-I-. tLJ
41
E F
I
------
R5-1
ARTE R.AL. STPU-
-% ARTERIAL STREET
S,Q,@
R3.3
essentially convert neighborhood blocks nto pedestrian-
oriented precincts.
Speed -humps' are carefuliv designed undulations in the
pavement surface that have been shown to control speed cf-
fCCEiVCIV without the risk of interfering with the driver's
control of the vehicle. These humps are EVPiC211V installed
across the width of the roadway, with a longitudinal circular
section 3 to 4 in in height and approximately 12 ft in length.
These should be distinguished from speed bumps. which are
much shorter (6 to 12 in long) and which have been associ-
ated with maintenance. safetv' and liability concerns.
A studv of the use of speed humps;' recommended that
the pavement Undulations should be used oniv under the
following conditions:
I .'he street serves a pur.-Iv local access function.
2.There is no more than one lane per direction.
3 .The street is not a transit or truck route.
4.The street is not zoned above 25 mph.
5.The 85th percentile speed exceeds 30 mph.
6.There is evidence of a speed-related accident problem.
Undulations should be located no less than 200 ft from
an intersection or sharp horizontal curve. and each undula-
tion should be visible for at least 200 ft. Standard warning
signs (e.g.. Sign Wg in the MUTCD) should be used. The use
of pavement stripes has also been suggested.52 but these
might give the appearance of crosswalks, which could mis-
lead motorists.
'Chokers' may consist of landscaped bulbs between the
sidewalk- and the strect, widened sidewalk ar@, or points
street entrances are necked down. Raised or brick
crosswalks may also be used in combination with pavemeit
undulations. In addition to numerous applications of these
devices in European and Australian cities. speed humps
have been used extensively in Pasadena, California.
The Woonerf requires motorized traffic and bicvcle traf-
Fic to adapt to pedestrian behavior, and it has become verv
popular in European countries. Extensive installations and
utilitv reioration are required, and initial costs and mainte-
rianc.- costs mav be high. Modified forms of this type of
control have been implemented in Boulder, Colorado; San
Francisco, and other United States cities.
,Neighborhood parking permit programs. to limit long-
term parking to those living in the area. have also been imple-
merited in a number of North-American cities and upheld bv
court decisions. These usuallv involve standard time-limit
parkinc, for the general public (1, 2. or 4 hours) with exe.-np-
tion for vehicles displaying a permit available oniv to resi-
dents. The parking restrictions mav aiso exclude vehicles
with no permit at certain hours of the dav.
Other traffic controls frequently requested bv residents
i.iclude stop signs, speed limits, turn prohibitions, and one-
-aN, street designations. In general. the application of
-nese de%-icts ma%. be expeced to ha,,,t the.same effects In
Tinca and others. Siincomr77ittee.ReLn-:,?,. P--@ eme?7r L?iciiiiz;-
Rnad Rc:)ort to the Caiifornia Traffic Controi Devicts Con.
No,emoc, 1983,
Burton w Steonens.-RoadHumpsfortheControiofvchicularSciecds
a,id T.@at'fic Flo--- Put)ii@ R,)aaj. ;O.! Dece-nber 986;. 3'--90.
residential neighborhoods as the%. do -Ise%%ne,:. arc
indiscriminate use should be avoided. Stop signs are pt
tentiv requested bv citizens %vith the expectation tna,,
will control speeds or reduce traffic volumes and accic
in residential neighborhoods. Although hcrt 'De s
effect on volume and accidents in certain instances.
is little evidence ot'.-ffect on traffic speeds attributed"
stop sign placement except within about -'OO ft of the i
section controlled. Some cities use special war,-ants
reduced minimum volume requirements for resid-,
neighborhood locations.
Nlost residential streets are covered b,.., -blankc.,- s:
limits of '-5 or 30 mph. though it is not uncommon I . or
percentile speed of traffic to be considerably higher. par
lariv on collector streets. In such c:@s. signs mcr-,Iv re-
drivers of tne general limits applicable to tne residen tiai
unless an overriding problem indicates the need to estab!
new speed zone on the street. Studies CvaiUaEing tne c
of speed limit sigas on speed have been large!,,. confine
major streets and have generally shown that signs have
little impact on driver speed on major streets. Drivers
sistentiv drive at speeds which thev perceive as reason.
comfortable. convenient. and safe under existing condit:
rcwdless of posted speed limils. Consistent enforce-
is essential to obtain anv measurable effect from postir
speed limits. Alternatives to speed zoning include paver
LLndulations (described above), traffic circles (discussec
low), and podium intersections. where the entire interse-,
is raised a few inches above the normal grade level with ra
to conform to the grades of the adjacent streets.
Turn prohibitions and one-wav streets can have a ver-,
nificant effect on traffic volumes. if their use is %cc.-,tze,
the affected drivers. Enforcement is essential. particu;.
when the regulations are first enacted. These measurC5
low-cost alternatives, and thev provide minimum imped-.
to 'emergency vehicles, which can travel the 'wrong v
when necessary. Speeds tend to be higher on one-wav str!
In residential neighborhoods. this can be counteracted
iimiting the number of blocks with one-wav continuity.
wav streets tend to be inherently safer than two- . wav sTx:
but in residential neighborhoods, where irreguliir patter-,
one-wav streets are used, careful treatment is essential a
tersections. Traffic circles tend to have higher violation i
and may represent a risk for increased accidents becau:
the tendencv of some motorists to violate the one-way
tem. especially in making left turns.
Other re-,ulatorv devices. - such as traff-ic signals.
signs. truck restriction signs, and access regulation signs
-.4ot Enter,- -Not a Thru Street,- "Dead End.' -Local Ac
Oniv.- and 'Thr-u 'Vehicles Prohibited'), have also been I
in residenT:Lai settings. The latter signs are used primaril
conjunction with one-wav streets (i.e.. 'Do Not Enter')
informational signs, although the use of 'Local Access 0
signs in the reguiator%l black-on-white format could conc
abin- be ci'4'--ctive in reducing traffic volume on reside:
streets it accompanied bv enforcement.
Warning signs in residential neighborhoods have firr.
uses. and drl%,ers and pedestrians usuall%l need to be wa;
oriiv of special hazards. The attention ofthe driver is dra'A
the location of schools (especially elementary schools)
playgrounds. to pavement undulations. to the fact that tr.
7raff@c.-I--gulaticr-s
carriers or diver--,rs are located ahead. and to stop and %'cid
slizns ahead if thev ma% not be readii,.- .-isible because of
curves or shrubber%. 'SioA-- siens. -Children at Pla% - signs.
and noveiz%l siens are vas!uc and unenforceable. Th.- result
maN-. therefore. have little more than a placebo effect on resi-
dents. The no%,-.It%- of a neA- slan wears off quicki%- and then no
lonper attracts the attention of reizular passers-b%-. Nonstan-
@@ard sizns usuall@. have no legal meaning or established prece-
dent: their us,- is discouraged because of both the lack of
proven effectiveness and undesirable iiabilitv exposure. Fur-
rher, driver respect for signs and other traffic controls ma%- be
eroded through the use of nonstandard and unneeded dev ices.
Geometric design features. Geometric design features
M'a%- be used to restrict access and/or reduce speeds in resi-
den tial settings. These include median barriers and cul-dc-
sacs at intersections with major streets. and semi-diverters.
diaponal diverters. and midblock cul-de-sacs on local resi-
dentiai streets. Some of these design features are also illus-
-
,rated n Figure 11-8. These are features that phvsicaliv
and prevent vehicle movement as well as reduce
speed. Their common characteristic is that bv their phvsical
form thev force or prohibit a specific action. Geometric fea-
tures have the advantage of being largeiv self-enforcing and of
creating a visual impression that a street is not intended for
through traffic. The disadvantages relative to other devices
are their cost. the potentially negative impact on emergency
and service vehicles. and the imposition of inconvenient ac-
c-@s on some parts of a nciehborhood. Thev are also static
and must be appropriate at all hours of the dav and night.
Rumble strips, formed with patterned sections of rough
pavement or raised pavement markers, have no effect on
traffic volumes and little on speed though thev do appear to
cause an increase in driver attention. Studies conducted on
major streets show that the strips have had a noticeable ef-
fe,-t ,-i reducing accidents when placed in advance of a stop
star.. Effects in lo-er-speed residential areas have not been
determined.
Introducing curvatures on a previously straight alignmeni
has been discussed as a phvsical speed control device, but this
has produced considerable public controversy and warnings
of possible associated safetv problems. Use of various designs
in Australia is reported to have a %,er%, subtle effect on driver
behavior.
%"aile,,- zutters and roueh pavements are two existing
devices that tend to control traffic as an unintended bv-
product of their presence. In neither case can it be suggested
that streets should be desizned to include vallev gutters
and rouzh pavement in order to reduce speed: however. the
effe-.-, mav be an argument for dc]an' ling repaving of pureiv
residential streets-an argument that should be carefull@
-eiizhed ap-ainst an%- noted indications of a hazardous o r
ciettricratine structural condition.
:','ay streets and orivat=- slieeis
Bo:- :)ia% streets and private streets are common in some
areas oF,, it L:-iiied States. Traffic flow ma%- be restricted on
such streets z,,irouph the use oftemporarv oarricades. si ns.
or 2ates. Such streets can be iemporaril% closed during cer-
'La:in hours. and permanent closure ma% also be considered
358 "a.-ICt:COK
in areas A-here v@ icular access to homes and szaraecs is pro-
%-ided for b%- alternate means such as allevs. - In lv'ancou,, -c,-. -
British Columbia. a number of blocks have been closed to
vehicular traffic and converted to exclusive use b%l pedestri-
ans. c%-ciists. strollers. and-in one case-an outdoor cafc.
Residents must park their vehicles on a cross street or alie%
or-wherc 3,.,ailabic-in off-street spaces. Provision I - or
emergency, vehicle entr%- into these blocks is provided b%- use
of traversable barriers in some. . out not all. cases.
Imolementina neighborhood
Lra,'TIC controls
The wa,, in which neighborhood traffic controls are im-
plemented can be as important to their eventual success or
failure as the substance of the strategies themselves. Impic-
mentation should be considered not as a step but as a process
requiring careful planning and documentation. public notice,
evaluation. and possibiv refinement of the strategies. Such a
a
process calls for the same ttcnilon to detail and for the same
thorough consideration as the initial planning -ffor-E.
The implementation of neighborhood traffic control
schemes mav raise issues about the responsible j urisdiction's
legal authority to take such actions. For example, the mea-
sures or devices used to effectuate traffic control mav be sub-
ject to state requirements as to design and/or application.
Legal questions mav also be raised about restrictions of ac-
-cess caused bv the plan. its environmental impact, or con-
cerns for tort liability. It is bevond the scope of this chapter to
report or advise on the legal requirements of various United
States states or foreign jurisdictions. However. legal counsel
is usuallv advisable in developing and implementing neigh-
borhood traffic control strategies.
Even when there is no question of authority, compliance
with standards. or other legal requirements. neighborhood
traffic control actions are sometimes challenged bv opponents
on grounds of denial of access or discrimination against non-
residents. In general. challenges to other-wise authorized traf-
fic control schemes on the grounds that thev cause incidental
inconvenience to some parties are fikeiv to fail; a comrnunitv
mav divert traffic and partially restrict accm but still suc-
cessfullv withstand a legal challenge. Tests of sufficient police
power and reasonable exercise of such power must stfll be met,
of course.
Evaluating the impact of neighborhood
traffic controls
Evaluation of technical performance and community perc@
tions is needed to provide a reasonable basis for decisions to
keep or abandon a plan- A formal evaluation can clarifv is-
sues. brinz the more stabilized long-term performance char-
acteristics into focus. and spotlight hidden gains and losses
that mav be significant. F:valuation can point to opportuni-
ties for modifvins! a traffic control plan to make it perform
its intended function better or to lessen adverse impacts. It
can also be used to determine whether the plan should be ex-
panded both in terms of devices and geographical area.
Finall,,,. evaluation can advance the state ofknowledpe about
neighborhood traf, -ic control and identifv problems that
might be avoided in future applications.
Effectiveness of controls. An evaluation should start Highwav Research Board. Ht:7n.cL F,,g. '4ational Cjopc,.2ii,c H,eM.a,
with this question: Do the controls fulfill their intended pur- Research Project Report 95. Washington, DC. 1,1-0
poses' Some effects are easilv evaluated through a -before- HOFF. G C...4 CPmpartiort oei@.een Seiecied
Chicago Area Expresswav Surveillance Protect Report Illinois 0-@ --
after' traffic studv. Other intended purposes involving public Chicago. 1969.
sion of High-avs.
perceptions and reactions are best evaluated with public in- HO.%tgLiRGER. W. S.. @ZABETH A. DEkKill P--Tflt C. @EL.%IA.".N, DA.,.IF.L 7
put. Evaluation should go bevond the question of effective- SM[Tlq. JR.. lk.'id BE)t@- BEUKERS. Resiaeprijai Street Detic,@ and
ness in fulfilling the plan's primarv intentions. however. In Comirot. JnsEitutc of Transportation Engineers. Eigic-ooti C:ii,@s. N;
particular, anv negative impacts of the plan as implemented Prenticc Hall. 1989.
should be identified. Technical staff can then follow up on Ho.-4avRrEx WS.. AND I..Ii KELL F:intiamentais ,t TrOfftL EaRjnee,,,fc.
12th Edition. Unavc,-saiv of California. institute of Transportattun
such matters (e.g., increased emergency response time) so as Studies. Bcrkelev. 1988. .
to develop modifications to offset negative effects. Involve- ITE Technical Council Committee -IA--k. -Yici@' Sien L;saitc ind -Xr)plico-
ment of emergency and service personnel can also help to tions.- Transportation Engineering, 43(i 0). (oc-occr i -913). 3-,
mini@ze such adverse effects. JOHNSON. P-. Ar4t) B.,'AcKjp4LEY. unpublished paper udrnitte@. o Tec-inicai
iminor adjustments to a neighborhood plan are -a common .kw2rd Committce.,\,Iissouri Vtdliv Section. institute or Transportation
occurrence. Observation during the period immediately fol- Engineers. 197 1.
lowing implementation is critical in order to identify prob- 'VIAYEFL P. A.. -one-wav Street$.- Traffic Conirni Lrt7,t Roaa.,a,. @,enen:, -
lems that could casiiv be eliminated bv minor adjustments. Their Relationship to HirrtK-ai- Saieti,. Hign-a@ Lscrs Federation :or
Saicty,2nd.'Aobiiitv, Washington. DC. i9'1. C.'-iap. 10.
Additional police surveillance also helps discourage erratic
'vlichipn DeP2rtrneni of State High-avs. Tiie -@coromfc anj
or illegal driving befiavior and vandalism. tEffectrof0me-@iivSirrrisinResiaenitai,4reas Lansing. 1969
National Committee on Uniform Traffic Ljws and Ordinances. L',?tio,-
'vlaintenance and enforcement issues. -Maintenai3ce and Veiytcie Coaeand.Vfodel 7rqlfic Ordinance. Evanston. IL. :087
enforcement are important to the continued effectiveness. of .141ELSEN. E.. -Experience from 10 Yc2rs Fignt against Traffic Congestion.-
the traffic control scheme and to continued public accept- 36tti International Congress. International Union ofpublic Transport.
anc.-. While the pbvsical maintenance of the plan probabi,, Brussels. Scigium. 196-4. p. I 5.
-ill require the greater amount of attention, in a broader Roads and Transportation Association of Canada. tfanual Lt'Geomeerrc
sense, maintenance also requires attention to the need for con- Desi!rn Standardsfor Canadian Roads. Ottawa. Ontario, I 996.
tinued driver respect and public support. It may be accessary Smoo,F. R. T- -Traffic Signs.' lmproed Street C'tili:ation through Tra]Tic En-
j ineertng,. Highway Research Board Special Report 93, Washington. DC.
to remind police officials of the need for enforcement, or to )Iiv 1967.
ask them to do 'focused enforcement' in arm that appear SlEc;i-;RT. A.. 'Speed Limit Irks Germans.- Chicago Tribune. October I 1.
to have a high violation rate. 1 ?7 1. Sec. I -A. p. 3.
Si%mqus. HER@. Veighborhood Traffic Controls. paper presented at the
2 5th Annual Meeting, Western Section. Institute o(Traff-ic Engineers.
Berkeley, CA. July 19-,2.
CES FOR FURT= ING STEpi tERs. Buit@ W.. -Road Humps for the Control of Vehicular Speeds
at d Traffic Flow.' Public Aoadr. 50. (December 1986). 82-90.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofrici@, A TAt4C k WAY.@ AND OTHER& Subcommittee Report on Pavement t,@'ndula-
Poilcv on Geometric Design ofhighwavs and Streets. Washington DC. iii,ns (AoadBumps). Report to the California.TraLfFic Control Devices
1990. pp. I 63. 2 I 2. C,)mmittec, November 1983.
U.S. I Department of Transportation. Wanual opt C'ni.form Traffic Control
American Association of State Highwav and Transportation Officials. D,,Ytces. Washington. DC. 1989.
.Vanual ]or @Waintenance and Inrpectlo)7 of Bridges. Wast3i ngton. DC.
1 974. U.S. I)epanment of Traz:sportition. Federal Highway Administration. .4
APPLEYARR). DoNALD.A,4DMARK Li@ 'The Environmental Quality of Bi kewa v Criteria Digesi. Washington. DC. 19 77.
Citv Streets: The Residents'Viewpoint.-Journal oftheamerican Inrr,- U.S. Department oftransportation. Federal Highway Administration. De-
rule of?ianners. 38 (March 1972). pp. 84-101. sijnandConstructionCriteriaforSikewavConsiructzonProjeczs.,Noticc
of- Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register. 45. (I 5 1), Washington. DC.
Automobile Club ofsouthcrn C@iiornia. Realistic Speed Zoning', ;Vhy and August 4, 1980.
Ho-. Los Angeles. 1976, p. 8. L;.S. I)cpar-Emcni of Transportation. Fcdcr2i Highway Administration.
BRL:C,-J. A-. -One-Wav,'Aajor Arterial Streets.- lmprovedstreet C'tili:ollon
Hirhway Statistics Summary to 1975. pp. 85-96. Highwa%- Statistics
rnrougn Traj)ric Engineering, Highway Research Board Special Report Su 7?mary to 198i. pp. 257-'260. and High-av Statistics Summarv to
9 3. Washington. DC. ;,4av 196 i.
19,t6. pp. 176-178. Washington. DC.
California Department of.\Iotor vehicles. P@iticie Code.,Sacramcnto. 1996. [;.S. D!partment oftransportatiou. Federal Highway Administration. Plan-
California Department of Transportation. Caii.fornia Rideshartng Faciii- ninr and Design Critertoji7r Bike%-avs tri.Caiifornia. Washington. DC.
;ies. Sacramento, lanuarv 1984. 19"9.
'zabiisning, CriierzaforSpeedLtmiis in Sci2oct Zones. Engineering Expcr. U.S. Di par-tment oftranspor-tation. Transportation Svstems Center, Priority
iment Station. West Virginia Liniversit@.. 196-,. Ter niiiques for High Occ.-ipancv Vehicles -State of the .-irr Overview'.
GILLARD, Q. -Los Angeles Diamond Lancs Freewav Experiment.- Traffic Wa;htngton, DC. -Novemocr 1975.
Quarierit. ENO Foundation for Transportation. Westport. CT. April
! 918.
HABIB, F) A AND OTHERS..4naivsls o -fPedestria)7 Cross-ai;z Saiert- on One.
I",J@ tree: Report DOT-OS--00;7. L;,S. Department of
ransr)or',aijon. Washington. DC. September 1978.
7ra.4fic Reguiaticris 359
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MA NA CEMENT PROGRAMS
With increasing frequency, cities and counties are turning to neigh-
borhood traffic management as a means of responding to citizen concerns about
traffic problems in residential areas.
Often, these concerns are prompted by the presence of non-local traffic
in residential areas, a condition that almost always signals the presence of
difficulties on the arterial or collector roadway network. These problems should
be addressed, wherever possible, prior to the implementation of more restrictive
controls.
Neighborhood traffic management programs can be v controversial.
As a result, they require careful planning, comprehensive study and thorough
debate before implementation is attempted. The planning process should
include these basic steps and involve public participation throughout:
Problem Identification - An exploration of the specific nature of the
problem or problems, and the issues and individuals involved.
Alternative Plans Generation - Definition
of the full range of plausible responses
to the identified problems.
Plar, Selection - Predicting the likely
effects of each alternative and choos-
ing an option which has the most
acceptable balance of positive and
negative impacts.
lmplement2tion - Preparing the public
for what is to take place, then actually
constructing or putting into effect the
planned traffic control changes.
Evaluation - Observing and measuring how the traffic man-
agement sy stem actually operates and identifying features
requiring change or fine tuning.
modification - Adjustments to correct functional difficulties or
to improve upon the initial planning concept or a larg@r-scale re-
consideration of alternatives-a recycling of the planning proces@
where the initial scheme has proven unacceptable or ineffective.
Traffic diversion is perhaps the most divisive of all neighborhood traffic
management stategies. As -such, it requires the greatest thought and considera-
tion. As an aid to the decision-making process, the advantages and disad-
vantages of traffic diversion are listed in Appendix C.
APPENDIX C
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC DIVERSION PROGRAMS
Advantages:
I -Improvements to a small area could be an incentive for families with
children to move back into the area.
2.Diversion can help keep the occasional high-speed vehicle from
using primarily residential, local streets as thoroughfares.
3.Selective street closures and the use of cul-de-sacs can provide
additional green space, play areas, pedestrian malls, or parking
area-; for residents or businesses.
4.Closing streets or diverting vehicle traffic may foster a stronger sense
of neighborhood or community identity.
5.Diversion may foster increased neighborhood activity and, coupled
with the lack of easy vehicle access and escape, help to reduce crime.
6.Within an affected area, traffic diversion may reduce noise, air
pollution and vibration, and may make the streets safer for children
and other pedestrians.
7.Controlling traffic can act as a catalyst that spurs neighborhood
revitalization.
8.Improvements in the public streetscape could provide an impetus for
the rehabilitation of private property.
.9.Selective street closures, cul-de-sacs and directional controls at
LElocal and arterial street intersections can reduce access conflicts
thereby improving traffic flow and5afety on arterial streets.
ra
Disadvantages:
m
1.Residents on streets in the vicinity of vehicle diverters may experience
LAhigher levels of traffic volume and associated environmental and
safety impacts.
Im
2.Diversion may give children or other residents a false sense of protec-
tion from motor vehicles.
3.Some cities have found that cul-de-sacs may heighten racial
segregation; closed-off, tightly knit streets may discourage
minority families from moving in.
4.Traffic diverted from residential streets may exceed the
capacity of adjacent arterial and collector streets and
require their upgrading or improvement.
5.Diverter installation (barriers, signs, islands and
pavement markings would require additional maintenance.
6.Additional right-of-way acquisition may be necessary for
both the target and alternative streets; for instance, diagonal
diverters and cul-de-sac construction could be restrained by
insufficient existing rights-of-way.
7.Diversion may result in access problems and may incon-
venience residents and visitors on the affected streets and in
the vicinity of the diverters.
8.Access for police, fire and other emergency vehicles may be
hampered and response times may increase unless adequate
provisions are made to ensure passage for such vehicles.
9.The implemertation of traffic restrictions without providing
reasonable options for traffic circulation may generate negative
reactions from both internal and external sources.
10. Traffic may not be eliminated but onl y redistributed.
II.Not all residential streets can have heavy traffic removed
by traffic diversion. Where traffic impacts on residential
streets cannot be reduced through street or transit improve-
ments, those impacts should be offset by public trade-offs
such as street landscaping and noise buffers.
PUBLIC/TRAF'FTC COMMISSION MEMNG
SEPTEMBER 28, 1"5
Engineer Lauber responded that he will research this and provide a copy of the chapter
on School Area Safety from the Traffic Engineers Manual to the Commission.
The direction from the Commission is to file the Warrant Policy.
3.Starlight Ridcie Speed Enforcement
Traffic Engineer Lauber distributed the'speed report and showed slides depicting sight
distance at the intersection of Santa Cecilia Drive and Agena Street. Staff
recommended moving forward on the "Street Modification Policy'. Staff would like to
work with the community to create modifications.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, representing Starlight Ridge Home Owners'
Association, reiterated his concern as the problem has not been resolved and the area
is not safe until "Stop" signs are installed.
William Utermomien, 42231 Cosmic Drive, distributed photos of vehicle skid marks
resulting from excessive speed in front of his home in Starlight Ridge, he recommended
a "Stop" sign at every intersection.
Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, President of Starlight Ridge Home Owners'
Association, spoke in favor of curb modifications including islands to define the
neighborhoods. He offered his services to be part of a possible committee to help
resolve this problem.
Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern for this problem but felt the Commission
could not approve a 4-way "Stop" on Santa Cecilia Drive and Agena Street. He
mentioned that a grant had been received in conjunction with the school district to
install a side walk on Santa Cecilia Drive from Cosmic Drive to Vail Elementary.
Engineer Lauber asked the Starlight Ridge residents to work with the community to
design the new sidewalk by getting together as Temecula citizens. He also stated that
he will provide a copy of his report to the Starlight Ridge residents.
Engineer Lauber stated that after researching all other possibilities, if staff finds that
nothing else can be done the "Stop" sign will be installed.
Commissioner Perry recommended that the Commission explore the area themselves
and place installation of 'Stop' signs as an action item on the next Agenda. He stated
that "we need to take remedial action in this area".
Engineer Lauber stated that the Public Works Department is taking the "Stop Sign
Installation Policy" bef ore the City Council on October 1 7, 1 995 which requires Council
approval.
Miiaut".Pu\092895 4
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission
F'ROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:December 7, 1995
SUBJECT:Item 4
Starlight Ridge Neighborhood Safety - Progress Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Discussion only
BACKGROUND:
On October 26, 1995 the Public/Traffic Safety Comniission recommended that staff submit the proposed
'Policy for Closure or Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets" to the City Council as soon as
possible. The goal of both staff and the Comniission is to put a policy in place that would regulate the
closure and/or modifications of residential streets for traffic calming throughout the City of Temecula.
The Director of Public Works was concerned about the previous approval received from the City
Attomey's office over a year ago. Because of these concerns, staff re-submitted the proposed policy back
to the City Attomey's office to guarantee all possible issues are resolved before City Council
consideration. This item has since received a confirmation from the City Attorney and is tentatively set
for the City Council meeting of December 12, 1995.
To prepare this Commission for the onset of Neighborhood Traffic Calming requests, staff has gathered
numerous references dealing with this issue. Although each author may not represent the views and
beliefs of the Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division, staff feels that this information
will assist everyone in understanding possible options and industry terminology.
F7ISCAL BWACT:
None
Attachment:
1.The Traffic Calming Toolbox
2.Proposed Policy for Closure or
Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets
"The Traflic Calmine Toolbox Bv TRANSTECH EARGLU= INC.
THE TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
INTRODUCTION
As is the case in many cities of many sizes. the City of Alhambra is continuously addressing the
difficult problems presented by the intrusion of vehicles upon collector streets with front-facing
residences. Although this situation is common throughout the industrialized world, the special
circumstances in ANmbm make the conflict particularly troublesome. Because the Interstate 7 1 0
Freewav has not yet been completed across the city, regional and sub-regional trips which would
otherwise utilize the freeway must find their way through available public corridors. Coupled with
the si 'ficant volumes which normally utilize the street system, the additional loadiniz exacerbates
glu
an issue which is sensitive under normal circumstances.
The problems and perceived problems of this regional trip loading onto local collector streets has
recentlv resulted in a focused analysis in the neighboring communities of San Marino and South
Pasadena. As a result of these investigations, there have been proposals put forward to employ
various "traffic canning" measures along some roadwav corridors, some of which would directly
affect traffic operations within the City of Alhambra. Ths report attempts to provide the cirv with
an overview of the available "traffic ca@ng" tools in an open. factual method, so that conunuruty
leaders mav understand the available options, the proposals being offered, and the likeiv
consequences.
THE CONCERN
.The additional volumes loaded from the missing freewav segment onto the remaining streets have
created an uncomfortable situation for the adjacent neil-hborhoods. In general terms, this condition
,xill develop in an area where the demand for higher-capacitv streets is not accommodated (where
the available street hierarchy structure is incomplete, or where travel demand exceeds arterial
capacitv). This discomfort becomes a legitimate concern for neighborhood safety when some
vehicles. frustrated bv the inefficiency of travelin2 on smaller streets. exceed a reasonable speed.
The combination of hiaher vehicular volume and occasionally excessive speeds is seen as an
intrusion into residential neighborhoods which reduces the qualirv of life, increases the potential for
traffic accidents. and increases the severitv of accidents. If the community judges the street traffic
characteristics to have exceeded the "reasonable" threshold. pressure to address the situation will be
applied to the jurisdictional authority throuizh petitions. calls, letters. or at public meetin!zs. When
the general discomfort of a neighborhood are focused bv a particular incident. the concerns of the
community will manifest into an outcry for the local authorities to remedy the situation by whatever
"The Traflic Calmint, Toolbox Bv TR,4)V.TTECH EA(G /A'
roadways and neighborhoods from an overburdening @c load. Defining the proper balance will
require a case-bv-case analysis for each street under consideration. Achieving and maintaining the
proper balance Aill require the application of the right combination of potential measures.
Developing a recommended practice will be a question of balance. and will require a sensitivity to
liability exposure.
TRAFFIC CALMING
To our knowledle,- the term "Traffic Calming" was first utilized in addressing this of complaint
during a transportation conference in the city of Darwin, Australia in 1990. The new term applies
to anv and all measures intended to divert, discourage, or slow vehicular trips in a sub-area (Level
1. Local Area Traffic Management); on a particular route (Level II, Sections of Arterial Roads), or
even on a metropolitan scale (Level III, Citv-Wide Calming). The Australian traffic engineering
community has most-fully developed the practice, and much can be learned from their efforts.
Within the United States, the City of Portland, Oregon, has been the onlv municipality which has
so far adopted the theory of "Tmffic Calming" as a practice, applving selective calming measures
dailv through the Traffic Calming division of the city's Traffic Engineering Department. The Citv
of Seattle.. Washington. has been deploying @c control measures within residential commuruties
for almost two decades. but has not developed a coordinated program. Seattle has been installing
small traffic diverters in residential intersections to deflect and slow traffic since 1978. Other
communities across the nation have developed programs of their own. others are starting to
experiment with traffic calming. There is an undeniable trend to appiv calming measures across the
nation. following the examples of Europe and Australia.
In spite of the intensi@- interest. there presently is no balanced recommended practice offered in
the literature surrounding "Traffic Calmine" bevond the point developed bv the Citv of Portland.
For the most part. traffic calming techniques are merely a collection of potential measures which will
divert or discourage trips from a route or area. Even in Portland. there is onlv a rudimentary
'dt:rat'on given to the legitimacy of the perceived problem. no analvsis of the implications of
consi 1
trip diversion. benefits to trip reduction. or disbenefits to forciniz trips onto alternate and more
circuitous routes. which mav or mav not be more capable of satisfying trip demand with greater
safetv or less conflict with the adjacent community.
Now oniv in its infancy, Traffic Calming as a theorv has far to go before a recommended policy of
implementation could be endorsed by Deportation professionals. Progress toward a recommended
policv for implementation of traffic calming techniques will most likely be verv slow. as the issue
(like school zone devices) is very locally sensitive. A considerably larger data base must be
de@-eloped and analvzed re-ardiniz the devices, their implications, effectiveness, and alternatives.
It -will be up to the local Deportation engineer and the elected officials within each community to
"The Traffic Colmine Toolbox Bv 7RANM INC
@c control devices (signing, striping, pavement markings, channelization, lighting) in a
coordinated manner in order to precisely dictate the desired driving behavior to the motorist,
at all times (or at least at all decision points). If the devices are properlv deploved, there
should be no doubt in the driver's mind what his proper behavior should be.
In applving the theory as a traffic c@ng device. the course of action would be to even
overkill the sensitive roadway with speed limit signing, reflectors, street lighting, pavement
markings (centerline, edge line, pavement messages), and whatever other devices mav be
effective in both providing guidance to the driver, and in imparting to him that he is in a
sensitive envirorunent. The proliferation of devices delivers the message that their behavior
is being assertively dictated.
4.Warning i@nina
It is not wise to over-saturate any area with warning signs (black on yellow background),
especially with exaggerated or false warnings. The result will be an increased disrespect for
the legitimate warning signs, and an overall degradation of roadway safety. Studies
conducted bv the Transportation Research Board, in conjunction with the Federal HiLhway
Administration and the Institute of Transportation Engineers conclusively show that indirect
warning signing such as "Children at Play" have no positive benefit. Such signs are not
authorized for use on public streets.
There are situations where a waminc, sign or silns ma-,, be lelitimatelv emploved in an
overall effort to calm @ic. If there is a limited si(yht distance. curve, hidden intersection.
street narrowing, or other roadwav factor that should be brought to the attention of an
approachiniz motorist, particularly if the concern of the community is with safety, the use of
appropriate waminq signing should be considered.
5.Intersection Channelization (movement Restrictions)
-Intersection channelization as a tmffic caln-iing device is ememely effective in reducing the
vehicular voltune on a particular route. Either throuizh paint or throuszh raised phvsical
barriers. channelization can limit the access onto or off of a particular street. It can be
emploved in various ways to sinszle out a particular intersection movement (left-out, straight
throuizh. right-in, etc.), or a combination of movements in order to force trips desiring that
movement onto an alternative route.
This methodology has been emploved nationally for several decades in "calming" the cut-
throutzh demand on a local street adjacent to an overburdened arterial. As with other
localized phvsical diverters, channelization diverts trips but does not discourage trips from
beiniz made. The consequences of the trip diversions should be considered when employing
5
"The TraiLic Calm int, Toolbox
Rv LR,4,VSTECH EVG
RS I)VC
into the buffer areas in order to present a less forgiving environment are applied. Most
typically, roadside treatments consist of a choker treatment limiting the width of the street
either at selected mid-block locations, or most commonly at intersections. The narrowing
has a secondary impact of making a more controlled pedestrian crossing.
Statistics can show that @ic accidents are more likely to occur in areas which look open
and'clear of conflict, but which have hidden obstacles. Roadways with more apparent
obstacles sometimes operate with better accident rates than roadways with subtle
shortcomings. With @ic calming, an intentional and obvious constricted envirorunent is
presented to incoming traffic in the attempt to reduce the comfort level of the driver and
increase alertness and reduce speed.
There are indications that there may be an improvement in accident rate in some cases.
However, the low overall cost-effectiveness of @s optior4 combined with possible problems
in emergency services and increased liability exposure, make it difficult for most authorities
to endorse the application of obstacles into the roadway environment as a worthwhile @ic
management device.
7.@eed Hug=
In spite of a considerable amount of resistance from highwa@, and safety professionals, speed
humps are being applied under certain circumstances to public roadways at an accelerating
pace. In certain areas of the country, and in the face of greatly increased exposure to tort
liability Judgements. their installation is becoming fairly common. Still, in manv areas of
the United States, speed bump installation is severelv restricted. even from most "ways open
to the public" on commonly owned private property.
A sununary of speed hump programs in otherjurisdictions is shown in the followin- table:
7
"The Traffic Calmint, Loolhox Bv
TRA)V. IAIC.
Originally, they were narrow bands of raised pavement intended (but not designed) to force
traffic to proceed slowly or have their vehicles phvslcaliv punished at higher speeds.
Operationally, however, the devices most often punished the prudent majon'tv of drivers
while sometimes giving the imprudent drivers a smoother ride at a hiaher speed. Onlv
recently have speed humps been employed on public streets. and with the public liability
exposure came the need to engineer speed hiunp design for specific effect. Most people are
verv familiar with -speed humps, many haye'ekperienced them on public streets, but few are
aware of the continuous experimentation and evaluation being conducted in the design and
performance of the device.
The standard speed hwnp design applied for the last decade was documented by the Citv of
Thousand Oaks, California. Recently, the preferred designs have been referred to as the
"Watts profile" or "flat top" humps. The design preference is now shifting toward the "sine
wave" hump, or the very elongated profile hump developed for Seminole County, Florida.
Regardless of the specific design, if this tool is emploved, a thorough documentation of
design and implementation analysis seems critical to address liability exposure.
Speed humps can be an effective tool which can be used to address an abuse of an imposed
street hierarchy under certain circumstances (if the inherent speed of traffic is not above 30
mph. if there is adequate sight-distance and warning, and if there is a preferred alternative
route). There should be a policy researched and adopted before anv installations are
considered.
8.Stop Si,,-,ns
The deployment of Stop signs along a route in order to address the issue of inappropriate
traffic characteristics has been utilized for several decades. Stop slcrm'n!z is most often an
effective and inexpensive method of addressing the concern. However, the tool is so
powerful that its use for calming traffic has been resisted by. transportation professionals.
An over-proliferation of Stop signs used for @ic calmin!z has an undermining effect on all
other Stop si-ans, and on all other @ic control devices. bv creating a contempt for them in
the mind of the driving public.
There has been some research conducted on the effect of "unwarranted" stop si-ns. or
installations which do not meet the minimum traffic criteria for stop sip installation as
recommended by the State's Traffic Manual. the Manual of Uniform Tmffic Control Devices,
and other Stop sian warrant systems. In the publication "An Evaluation of Unwarranted Stop
SIL,ns" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, a conclusion was reached that "the
hierarchy of the street svstem must be identifiable and the arterial and collectors must be
sufficient to meet demand." Without an established and adequate hierarchy, misuse of
lower-level streets will develop. The study reconunends that communities develop and
9
"The 7r@ic Calmint, Toolbox Bi H ENGIIVEERS INC
11.Parking
The presence of roadside parking (on-street) along a street encroaches into the roadside
buffer areas and restricts sight@stances similarly to other obstacles. It is interesting to note
that the restriction of sight-&stance created by on-street parking is the most common factor
in residential street pedestrian / vehicle @c accidents. Forthis reason alone. a relaxation
of an existin parking restriction for traffic calming purposes has not been sen'ouslv
. 9
considered as an option.
12.One-way
The installation of a one-way traffic restriction is not easily achieved. By far the foremost
obstacle to further consideration of the one-wav street alternative is the fact that a proximate
couplet street must be present. With the reverse@ction couplet, volumes are split between
two routes. Tv picallv, this means a reduction for one street, but an increase for the couplet.
This increase is politically acceptable in most circumstances only if the street is alreadv
commercial bv nature, and in need of additional traffic exposure.
The one-way tool is iznpactive in many ways to the adjacent properties. Access becomes a
constant irritant. However. the traffic efficiencv of the route becomes vastlv improved. as
conflicting turning movements are eliminated. The one-way couplet setup can acconunodate
a hlizh traffic demand with ease. Althou!zh not conunon. it is an option which should be
'dered if the IoL,'cal couplet can be developed. The one-wav couplet is a traffic calming
consi -1
tool which may provide both a perceived improvement to quality of life, and an actual
improvement to traffic efficiency and safety.
13.Truck Restrictions
The truck mix@e of a street's averaize dailv traffic mav be an important aspect of the
neighborhood concern. Trucks are ob=ive in size. noise. exhaust. and legitimately do not
belon!z on streets lower in the hierarchy. An acencv must be careful not to exclude truck
@ic from a corridor unless a locical alternative truck route is available, however, a truck
restriction is le2al1v achievable and politically acceptable in most communities. It frequently
mav serve as a sufficiently effective @c calming device. Truck restrictions, as well as
other potential regulatory measures
14.Closure
The -'ultimate" calming technique is an option frequently requested bv at least a se,,Ment of
the affected residential community. Although this option can often be easily dismissed as
I I
"The Trad:lc C-almint, Toolbo.,r Bi- TRAN lArC.
CONCLUSION
This report is intended to provide a greater understanding of the issues involved with the evolving
application of =ffic c@g techniques. What can be concluded at @s point in time from the data
presented is that although there are several options when presented with the concern. each situation
should be treated as unique. A thorough understanding of the real problem, the options. and their
consequences should be attained before action is undertaken. The specific measures under
consi 'deration should be evaluated carefully against the roadway characteristics, driver behavior.
operational consequences, and against the proven Mffic problems to ensure that the application of
the measures will improve the situation.
The need to manage mffic c@ng devices in residential applications is not new, but it is growiniz
'dlv and will not go away. Until a more uniform policy is developed, the urban traffic engineer
rapi
must seek to find a balance in each case.
TrafEc g as a concept encompasses anv effort to reduce or c the negative impacts of motor
vehicles on residential arew and local activitv districts. It does not mean the complete c on of mm
and trucks, but rather the implementation @f controls (such as. strict speed limits), the co ction of
devices (such as @c humps), or the reo on of systems (such as diversion of throup-h-@c) with
the airn of allowing people and machines to comfortably and safely.
Under this specific de@tion, =ffic @g does not include ped@ani@tion, the creation of automobile-
free zones, the orgnni-tion of pedestrian pock=, the building of downtown malls, the mp@g of
overall circulation networks, the designation of b@vs, the control of pollution, S=ral pro to
prevent @c accidents, etc. All these positive actions have their own approaches, m@ods and standards,
and their oAm volun-Linous bibliographies. Such rcfer=ccs are not included here.
idea of traffic calmin2 can be traced back to the verv first appearance of the motor car that izcnerated
'derable anxieties about personal safet,,,. There are also notable cariv efforts ' the United States that
consi in
have attempted to deal with the automobile in a rational and constricting N%-av (Radburn. for example).
Dun'niz the period of suburbanization and automobilization after World War 11, on the other hand. there has
been finle thouiZhE given to traffic calmine 'in this countr%,, and the concept almost could 'have be=
Class'@ as "un-American." There have been a few but ver% ' lated thrusts (Berkele%., for example).
L I ISO
Attitudes appear to be chaneing, ho-.-.,cver, 'in the 1990s, and increasing interest can be discerned in
North America. Papers are be'ma presented occasionally at Deportation con&rences. which are not
al%@-a,,-s published. as for e%ample in recent vears at the annual Januarv conferences of the Transportation
Research Board in WashinLrton.
In Europe. a much more aggressive policy has been adopted in the hien%, 'Mdusffialized countries since the
1970s. Tnere have been hundre@s. @f not thousands, of examples and permanent pro- and
2o,.,er=ents have taken an actl,.,e role. That is also A-h,- European references on traffic calnu'nL7 are
numerous. @-hile the American inventon- is extreme]%- limited. Assuminiz that the time is ripe. there appears
to be a need to bnniz the available experience to the attention of those in the New World who ma%-,%ish to
'd@ im
cc)nsi -rand plemcnt traffic calm'ng procrams in the r communities.
To be bruruall%- frank about the whole bus';ness. the elements. devices. and actions used to accomplish
traf,ic cainunz- are rather obvious. This %%-hole in%-entor\- is some%%-hat limited and is described re' eatedlv in
p
man% of tL- references contained in this bibilo2rat)h\-. The real planninp- and research interest lies 'ui the
experiences with this concept under dif@'crent circumstances and in differe-it places.
Tn,- term "traffic calm'm2" is not \-et a household \vord, and. ind@ appears to be somnvhat quaint to most
people. Ye,, as a matter of fact. it is workable and full,%! descriptive of the idea. Given the sequence of
de%,.-lopment. the Enizilsh term Is a direct translation of the earlier German "VerkehrsberuhiLrung." It is still
in I I 'd
c--ri-,- cia\-sthe definition and general acc.-pt--nce of the traffic caimin2 concept as an I entifiable area of
research andpractice. A consequence of this fact is that a numbe.- of other terms are @ll 'in use. The,%, are
not e%actl%- kev words, but the-.. %\ill be found in references and as descriptors of fo@ and informal
programs in various countries.
3.Emergency vehicle access should be accommodated in keeping within the
emstine Fire Bureau response standards. If cur-rent emergency vehicle access
does not meet the @stng response standard, traffic cabning efforts should not
further degrade the response time.
4.Transit service access. safety. and scheduling should not be significantly
impacted.
S.Reasonable automobile access should be maintained. Pedes@. bicycle, and
transit access should be encouraged and @anced wherever possible and
within budget limitations. Projects should be coordinated with.the Bicycle and.
Pedestrian programs where appropriate.
6.Parking removal should be considered on a project-by-project basis. Parldng
needs of residents should be balanced with the equally important functions of
traffic, emergency vehicle access, @sit, bicycle, and pedestrian movement.
7.Application of the Traffic Calming Program shall be limited to those
Neighborhood Collector Streets that are primarily residential, and to Local
Service Streets. Where appropriate. projects on Neighborhood Collector Streets
should be coordinated with projects on Local Service Streets.
8.Traffic c g projects on Neighborhood Collector Streets shall not divert
traff:Lc off the project street through the use of traffic diversion devices. As a
result of a project on a Neighborhood Collector, the amount of traffic increase
acceptable on a parallel Local Service Street shall not e--cceed 150 vehicles per
dav.
9.Traffic mav be rerouted from one Local Service Street to another as a result of
a traffic c g project. The acceptable ;raffic increase should be def3.ned on
a project-bv-project basis. An "impact threshold curve" (see Appendix B)
establishedby the Portland Office of Transportation shall serve as a gwdeline
to determine the amount of rerouted traffic that is acceptable on Local Service
Program, certain procedures should be
followed bv the Office of Transpor-cation in processing =affic calming requests
in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the @ts
of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for
submi@ of project proposals, project evaluation and selection citizen
participation: communication of anv test results and specific fmdines to
project area residents and affect@d neighborhood organizations before
g devices; and appropriate Council
Streets.
10.To implement the Traffic C
installation of permanent traffic c
review.
4
OBJECTI@'ES
The overall objectives of the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program are
derived from existing Citv polic@. and the mis5ion of the Portland Office of
Transportation. Thev are,
I
Improve neighborhood livabiii[v bv mitigating the impact of vehicular traffic
on residential neia4borhoods.
Promote safe and pleasant conditions for moto@Ls, bicyclists, pedestrians.
and residents on neighborhood streets.
3.Encourage citizen involvement in all phases of neighborhood traffic
manaapment acti%@iies.
z;-
\,take efficient use of Citv resources bv prioriti:lng traffic management
requests.
5.Support the policies contained in the Tran-@-Dortation Element of the COMDre-
hensive Plan to "provide for the safe and e!,ficien[ movement of people and
2oods while prese@@na, e.,ihancinc. or reclaiming the nelahborhoods'li%@abil-
it@"' and to ",auide the use of the cit%- street to zontrol air pollution.
traffic. and livabilirv probiem-r,."
AM
TYPES OF PROJECTS
The N'T@IP includes tA-o t@ es of projects-
"P
1. local service street projects and 2)
collector recovery projects. In addition.
neighborhood area studies are conducted
b@- the Transportation P@ng Di%uion of
the Office of Transportation.
This brochure provides information to
residents to heid them participate in local
se;-%-ice street projects. Collector recoverv
proiects and neighborhood area smdies are
ai-@o brieq@, described here to acouain[ the
readerw@th the other tr.,iiic management
options hat are a%?ailable and exoiain the
tio@ in "-hi-h the%- aoDl\-.
Local sen@ce street pr@iezu, are intended to
respond to traffic Issued 7el,aLed Lo st)eedir,2
and excessive throuah---affic on one iocal
@;:r2et in a neighborhood. Solutions ma%-
lri@iude -e%isiLinc-z to the local street Lo siliv,-
.-'fic or
t :i -o comr)ietel%- or t)ar[iallv diverl
:ra@'ic off of the :-zireei.
-en, proic.,:-z aacire--
cj,tle-@,or reco@ traffic
-jes on c Lr
la-z-; "L'i 1 e i e, 2 ri o o r,@,,)
c,@ile.-ror Th@e at,. street- w'tlicl,
are idredominanil%- resia'@-itial. The goal 1-@
to deveioi) education. e-iorcemen[. and
eicineenno measures z,, iecrea4-zc The
,a
nej tine impacts @oc@ d A-it'ri '-;Dee"lil@
and excessive volumes on nei@,iDcr'nood
collector streets. The issues @ffel- ot)t)or,.i.,-
niiies for mitigation umaue to collector
streets and different from those applied
through local se,-%ice street projects.
ineighb orhood area studies respond to
excessive throu2h--raffic spet!dine or.
multiple streets in one or more nelz'ri'Dor-
hoods. These plan:- are recuired to resdon@-
to traffic problem-, @t are s%-mpLomai:c oi
wider problems. such as congestion or lacl--,
of capacitv on :he ane-ial s@-stem. The
problems may be similar co those addressed
bN, local se-%@@e street projects. but are more
pervasive. A-ith hion volumes of chrouc,@-
traffic on more one adiacent siree,.
Neighborhood arc studies are de%-eloded
pnr'naril%- t'nrouj@ 7 e Tr3@orution
Piannincy Di@,sion. %@-iih the invol%-e-nent of
other Cit%- burcluz. The%, rN-Dicall%- include
anai%,ri5 ol iir.,.4 use and traffic patte.@- boi'r-.
@%IL@in and outside the stud\- area. and
include invoix-e-ne.-,,, of affected net hbor-
9
hood a5s,,)ciaiioris. . business amups, and
indi\@duai-@ -.hrouLy'nout the Droc@--z. The%-
are schedu'ed b d on ax-ailabie resource
I a-ce
and given pric@[%- i'.-;ctor-@ chat inc'ude
but are not :LI
PreN-Iou;z e" !io7:;-z or requesi-z in irie area
InLe,,isii@- of @L@,e -iroble:L-.-z
Decrell ot Delwee7i :raiii:
conditioner -1,id ',-and uses
@vaii aoiiil@' "I
Artenai imiDrL,%-e@,en[ projects scheduled
,r oianne,-.
L
T'ne purpose of the petition-to-studv is
to de,.ermine the level of a ement
among resideic3 on the project street
that there is a i)robiem Lhev want to
address. Cit@ staff prepare the petiuon,
describing the problem and the. proce-
dures to be follo%%,ed if a study is
undertaken. The project requestorl's) is
responsible for circulating the petition.
with Citv 5tal'i assistance as reouired.
Sic-,naiures representing a majontv of the
households ,n@'ousmesses @Ehir, t'ne
,-e,ition-to-szud%- area are required -.o
mo@-c the project fonvard. Each
household and busines-@, is entitled ,o
oi,,e signature. Non-reside-,it pr'ope-T@
oi@'riers are nLL included in the petition-
to-5tudv proc@,-zz-:.
4.Plan DeN,elopment
The Citv ho'ta'_; a public meeting in -.he
area to infOrTi' off the pe,-lc:inz
i),-,)iec:. to d@-cc-ibe Lhc N--@'v[P proc@s;-z.
ar.c to catner additional informaiilr.
about the orooicp:- and re',.a:c@
nc'2@,borhoL,d
LIZen cl)mmitiez, Lq L
tr,ii-@ 5caLe. :I,aiiic committee work:-
k'-itv @,-Lal".'io dee.-mine its me-n'oel
sl,iio ciiier&a irc meetin@ Drocedures.
ar.@u conunu@- to work- cioseiv with
irirouahout the re-nainde7 of the
pro-@ect.
Plan :@--.,eior)ment consists of the
A-z,:@z-:.ment of problems and nee@-;-:
Id en---,icacion oi projec-. ooai.-z ir.@"
ob@.--@%,es
a Ide-:iication of evaluation cnie-,ia
- De,.-.,-jpment of alternative plans/
soi,.:,:on-r
e-@.-:,-On oi a proposed plan
The two -Zzeps are accomplished
thrc-.::--- pubiic meeeincc. neia4bor'nood@
assDc:@---On meetings. and traffic comrrut-
tee The Cit%- proposes
5oiL,!.:@--z ba:,eci on uiis citizen input and
SOLI-Z @-,i,a.ne@nng pnnc-Lt)ies. Po;-4-Z'L'ole
solu.::. --z anc rrieir imi)acts are e@-aiuated
b%- i@-. --@ffic zommitice. Citv bureaus.
and aff@-[ed a@eicies.
5.Test Retaliation
Or.@12@-ian -,-;: acree,., on o%, the
ar"-'l C@t%- -z:af@. tne
a pe,ition desc-ibinz the
Prot:,oro!e-c, and callinz tor
installation. Traff::
cor."-rcuiate the
"7
as reouireci.
For projec--z that do not include traffic
diversion. a rnajoritv of -,hose ballots
that are reumed must be in favor of
the projec,, for it to proceed to Citv
Council action.
For projec-;: that do include traffic
diversion remo%,ino or rerouting an
existing flow of traffic through con-
Str,UCtion or
I phvsical barriers such as
cul-de-sac-; or full or partial diveners).
the majont@. of elic-ible households and
businesses In the @allol area must
respond fa%-orabiv For e.@,mpie. with
s'
100 eligible @ou choid5/businesses. 51
affirmative - responses must be received
for the project to proceed.
Eac-,i household busine-@-;. and non-
resident pror)e,,7@- owner is entitled to
one ballot.
Citv Council Action
PTL)le."t iiil)n and a
-,nc
T'-Lc re:)or7
inz ;zzices [tic
Desi!,n and Construction
Final desin and construction is
administered b%- the L-ic\- and is
aencrallv @.)mr)ieed 12 months
afte,- :he ballot.
S.
Base-', in
- i@
r) o s @l i ic ;, a " c i. t,,
predare.a
i or Clt\-
outlines 'ne
ine proie,..
reasons fL,- .'.,ie
jrolec:
required -@.!,"Ot -Li i-@ not
for-,%-arde@-@ :1.1 L-Ii%' (--L)unc,;
10.Monitorino,
The Portland Office ol Trar,-;-Dor-,aLl,.,r,
and the Bureau of Park5 and Re.-rea-lor,
monitor constructed de%-icez. The
Office of Transportation is rp-sdonsicie
for the phvsical appearance of the
proje-.,- and for traffic control device-.
and the Bureau of Park5 ir reSpOnr--lDIC
for landscape maintenance.
11.Follow-Up Evaluation
\&;'ithin 3--o 5 vear@- after ol
an NT\.IP oroject. the Citv zonduc,@ a
follow-ud evaluation to deee-mine .',,he
. . i I
projects -70ais anci oojec,,i\-e,-z contin,-,e
to be mei. This e% -aluation .mav enl-,il
traffic szudies of volumes. sdeeds. and
accidents. as well as public )Dtnion
Aimchme,it 2
TR.,KFFIC NIANAGENFENT DE@ICES
This :)ro%ide-r,3 brief descriptitin oi . 3. @hoker5 or curb eXten5iOn5 ral',O%@'
@%icenin@ ti-ie s il%
5ome --ommonl@- used traffic management the s-,rec,'D%
de%-.czz-. A c.@art summarzino-Ehe effect:- or the lan@caded par@inz 3tric.
These d a Vn EC 7L-,aK@
these and Other pos5-Lble devices is also re emr)io
inc;uded. pedestrian c.,ossin2s casic7 and LD
narrow the roadwav The,.- pro%-ide -a
1. Traffic circles are rated islands visual Cue LO Motorists that the%. are
Dlac.-d in an intersection. The on a non-artenai route.
pnmarv pumose of a traffic circle is
to slow hiah-speed traffic. Traffic 4. Semi-diverters limit access to a
circles are most effective when street frorr, one direction b@- bioca-inc,
constricted in -i series on a local half the -zz-ect. The,, . m-a@- a@o be
@-er.,ic@ zirce,. @n additional bene,,,,. corlsirucle@- -Io @imit certain move-
is that the,.- reduce the number of me,,iL:- at an intersection. -@tmi-
reported ICC-Lde-iLr. kreported ciiverter:- ire aeie.,aliv eiTez:l%,e ir,
accidents Lend co be more severe reduc@na -,-oiumes. esdeclail%- if Ehe
Inan unreported acclIdenLc.) predominanc direction of i-a%,e! on
I
street is the one "-here access LI:
Cul-de-sacs are COMD'[Cte CiOSUre--z 01" reduced. -, hn, allow a hlq'.rier
[.Ile -Zzree:. eitne7 midblock or at ar. of vehicle acces-c tnar. ,,li-
inLerse.,:ion. i ic%, a.-', inteiced to de--zac-z or -@la@onai diverie7:-.
@:,mpie,el%- biL)c'@ ac.-es5 irom one
end oi local Bv doi,,@ so 5. Diaconal diverters DiaCC
-,-rosz ir, !nLersc:[ioT-..
L"3]OT @e3uc,,,C-.-Z 111, ird
)nne,.:,nz Lrie i@;z oi tre
1)[Ume result. @ c,.i@-@e-sac insi
-IC2@ ire
,real@ Drobiens
ir. -Iduc,,n2 -volume. T'-Ie,.-
IC-2s-;
aiioik,.,norc ,,ecciom,)i
@10 c)ie- can
in-7@ 2hbor-,-)od @L--n
cie--zac-;. @:a@,.,nai d@%-2-ter-z @ar,c-I
-c -icie :11,
L 11
i insallee .o 'Irk)% -L
r-.ouire,.- @o the,,- DrcLerT%- emer2elic"".,ehicle acces-c-
route @f access bloc.-,
Tr@c C@ Dev&=for CoU=to,-,Srcwr
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For the past ten years City of P@d has been actively developing and applying @r.
manag=cnt techniques to City madways in @ w enhance livability for adjacent residents.
lie enhancement of neighborhood livability has been achieved in large part by the reduction
of traffic @. During this @od the City has developed and implemented the
Neighkffiood Traffic ManaLement Progmm to @ss @c'related issues on
residential s=--t classified as Local Scr-,iice Str=ts according to the Comp=h@ve Plan.
The City is now in the process of developing the Tmffic g Program (ATCP)
to address similar @c related issue on residential smets clas@ as Neighbm-hood
Collectm.
The fundamental diffe=nce between the prog=s, both of which sAAress =sidentw
issues, is based primarily on the policy distinction be n s=e--ts classified as @ Service
S@-ts and Neighborhood CoUw= Sawts according to the Transportation element of the
Comprehensive Plan. This is an important distinction in @ many of the roadways found in
both of these classifications have @ar character and look, including volume, width, speed,
and adjacent land-use. According to policy, however, Neighborhood Collector roadways a=
to func6on as low level an@s (c@g through trips). while Local Service Sa=ts a= to
serve adjacent land-use only. Thus, these two su=t classifications requires fundamentally
diffr.rr.nt approaches to @c c@g.
This distinction plaved a significant mle in helping to iden@ primary goals for the ATCP.
Because of this policy distinction the ATCP is being developed with two
goals:
1)ne first primary goal of the ATCP is the enhancements of =sidr-ntial livability along
the roadway. This early includes livability enhancement for pedestrians,
residents, bicyclists, =sit user, school children, ex..
The @ond primary goal of the ATCP is to maintain, to the extent possible, the
anc.@ intepity of the roadway. 7be viability of the roadway to car.,-y local through
=ffic should not be so de as to create si,.@cant @ic volume shifts.
The devices idendfird in this =port w=t evaluated for the= ability to meet the two primary
goals of the ATCP. Devices we= evaluated.in terms of speed reduction, residential
enhancement, @@ enhancement, 'unp=t on @,t, impact on emergency services,
impact on adjacent access, and impact on general vehicle opm-ation including sa&ry and
delay. The =port categoh=s the devices according -to their cur=nt smms for appropriateness
for use on co@-= roadways. 'Ibr-se categories include:
Page a -3
mm
SUMMMY
C@g Devices for C4U&aor Sv'ccs
INTRODUCTION
This report has been produced as part of the development of the' Ar=Tial Traffic 9
Program, ATCP (formally the Collector Recovery Program). This comparative discussion of
@c calming devices was prepared as a way of idenff*g both approved and potential
devices for use as part of @ pmg=. The =port c=gorizes the devices according to their
current smrus for appropriateness for use on collector roadways. Ilese categories include:
Approved Devices
Devices Under Test or Demonstration
Potential Devices
Other Devices
Each device has been evaluated in the report under the following standard format.-
Objecfives
The broad-based primary and secondary objectives for each device.
AppLfc@n
The general circumstances under which use of the device can be considered both in by
itself or as pan of a street scheme or plan.
Limitations
The limitations on the use of the device, ie., where. the device is appropriate or
inappropriate.
Advantages
The main advantaecs or "s=ong points' in favor of use of the device.
Disadvantages
The main disadvantage or "-strong points" @s-, use of the device.
Unresolved Issues
Unrr solved issues with potential for developing into either advantages or
'disadvantages. Issues are unresolved due to lack of :field experience with device.
With continued testing and demonstrations these issues will @-ome msolvez
Ile report is intended to be a preliminary @line only. Tne guidelines included in this
report require additional engineering expertise and judgment in the development of c
solutions for c iden@d site problems.
Page 9-5
RNTRODUCTION
Tr&& C@ Devices for CoUartar S:rwj
CURB EXTENSIONS
objecfive
2@ance p@@ crossing point.
n C=tc visual sc=n or b@ along li= of roadway.
App@n
0 extensions are applicable on roadways with vesicular mffic perceived as being
incompatible with the adja=nt @dential land use.
0Curb extensions can be installed ci@ at intersections or mid-blocl
0 Curb extensions may be used in conj@on witli other @c calming devices.
Lim@ns
5Curb extensions are limited only to the degree that they extend into the travel way..
(Curb extensions cannot iinpede or re@ the two-way operation of the roadway)
0Cm-b extension can be used on all roadway classifications according to the
Transportation Element of the City of P@d Comprehensive Plan with the exception
of "Regional Trafficways".
Adva@ges
a Reduces pedestrian crossing distance and time.
n Provides visual enhancement of pcdc@ cmssing point.
0P.-events passing of @g vehicles.
0Requires no deviation from s=aight @ vehicle path.
0 Facilitates transit loadine and unloading.
Disadva@ges
n Some parldng removal rrqui=d.
0FiL-b installation cost
a F-ffr-ctive c@ extension design precludes bicycle accommodation
Unresolved Issues
0Cost/benefit
5Maintenance Costs
2 Bicvcle ar-co=odation.
ftge 0-7
Tr@ C@ Devices for Collacior Stregu
MEEDIANS
Objecfive
a Provide visual cue of change in madway enV'lMr=CnL
APPLFC@N
0m@ans applicable on roadways with vchiculu @ivcd as @g
incompatible with the adjacent residendd land use.
a Medians may be used in conjunction vath other @c cnlming devices.
Limitadons
nM@ans have no general limimtions.
mM@s can be used on all roadway classifications according to the T@ortation
Element of the City of Portland Comprehe='ve Plan with the exception of "Regional
Trafflcways".
Advantages
a Provides visual enhancement of roadway environment (particululy if landscaped).
0Prevents passing.
n Separates opposing vehicle travel lanes.
Disadvantages
a Major parking removal req@
0Expensive @cul@y if lands@ing included).
n F-,ohibits and/or @ts access and movemenl
Unresolved Issues
Bicv-cle issues
n Co@nefir
Pop* 2-9
Speed Sump
(typical)
28'
=1 Wine
tfpi=l
Canter of T@ Long
W260
IOCY
@pficnal
Seciion A-A
Section B-B
-U
cu r@
F
T@ C@g Devicei for CoU@r Strecs
Al
FLAT
q.
Co of
I YAMM)
c6m D
Opric
Ica, is
r r;= Lno
PAJLASCUC
w clan c
TACK Caa
T,@c C@,g De,,= fo, CoUwwr Sere=
ENTRY TREATMENT
objectfve
s Provide visual and tactile cue to drivers of entry into specific area or environment.
AppLfcadon
0Entry treatments are applicable an roadways at @tion points between two diff=nt
land use environments or two diff=nt str=t classifications.
0Entry treatments may be used in conjunction with other =affic calming devices such as
raised thresholds, curb extensions =&or pavement treatments.
Liynitations
nThe effectiveness of an entry =a=ent to influence motorist behavior is limited
unless included as part of an overall =Mc calming plan for a SU=L
Entry tma=ents are @ted for use on two lane or less residential su=ts classified as
either "local service sa=ts" or 'neighborhood collector s=cts" according to the
T=sportation Element of the City of Portland Comprehensive Plan.
Advantages
a @ovides strong indication of changing environment and/or drivine conditions..
n Enhances pedestrian crossing seen
n Aestheticallv appealing (impmves app cc of in==don).
5 Poses no access restrictions for roadway users.
Disadvantages
a Pivement trea=ent or brick work is very exp@ve.
Unresolved Issues
a Cost
a CosT/Benefit
2Device maintenance issues.
1-13
Tr4rLc g Device--for Concaor szr@
DIAN SLOW POINT
A
10 4
L> A
AM-BLOCK
20- ON A-A
v S.Ecn
LA
1N,.iERSECTION
ftgo 8-16
Traf,c C@ Devices fo,- COD Stregu
Unresolyed Issues
nAccess issues for mncrgency services and r=it vehicles.
nDevice maintenance issues.
0cost
aDevice desip
a Device gs
ftpo 2-18 IDEVIC@ LINDLA I'@ URU@WON.S JUN
7rqrtc Deywesjbr CaUecior Siregrs
COLORED & TEXTURF-D PAVF- TREATMENTS
obje,cfive
0Reduce v@cle speed.
0 Provide visual and =dle cue to drivers of entry into specific =a or environment
App&-@n
0Col@ & t=rumd pavement trca=ents am applicable on roadways with v@cular
perceived as being incompatible with the adjacent residential land use.
aMay be used in conjunction with other mffic calming devices such as raised
thresholds, curb extensions and/or pavement tma=ents.-
Lim&dons
aColored & Textured pavement ==ents are limited for use on two lane or less
=sidentw str=rs cwsified as 'local service s=cts" or "neighborhood collector
s==ts" accordingto the Transpormrion Element of the City of Portland
Comprehensive Pi=
8The e.Tccrivencss of colmrd & textured pavement tma=cnt is limited unless included
as pan of an overall @c management plan for a sa=L
aTextured pavement treatments arc limited by the degree of tma=ent mughness
(roulrhness impacts noise and bicyclc/motarcyclc safety).
Adva=ges
s Provides s=g indication of changing environment and/or driving conditions.
0If tactile enough, speed reduction possible.
0Potentially aesthetically appealing Cif brick or block is used)
0Poses no access restrictions for roadway users.
a Rcquirts no paridng removal
Disadvantages
0The more @e, the more noisy.
2Possibly c=tes hazard for bicyclists
0 If not tactile enou@ limited =Mc calming value.
DEVJ@ UIVL)ER T@ uxv&m
ftgo B-.w
Tra& C@ Devs=for CoUz=r S&ecr
POTENTIAL DEVICES
potential devices a= devices which have pomntial for use on higher volume residentw stmets
and/or the Arr@al Traffic Calrning Program, but due to design cons=aints cannot be tested or
demonstrated on the two existing test proje=. 'It is recommc@ that devices id=dfied in
this category be -tested or demons=am4 when appropriate, as par t of furu= proje=.
Oaly the s@ntine/offset device cur=ntly faus i= this camgory.
Page 1-23 Po 1 t-,Vj AL 10
Tr@ C@ng Device-r for C*Uecior Sirecs
SERPENT OFFSET
New Curb Une
..........
IL
IQ
CITY OF TEMECULA
POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODMCATION
OF TRAMC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS
Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all 'official traffic control devices"
authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods autho@ in particular
circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway design
.features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow.
A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re-
@ning ]Rreviously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meeting all
of the following criteria:
a.The street must be classified as a 'local street' based on the City's Circulation
Element of the General Plan.
b.Ile street should be primarily residential in nature.
c.Traffic volumes on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a
complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles
per day.
d.Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public
safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification.
e.An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow
modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets
which may be impacted by diverted traffic.
The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the
City.
g.AD persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or @c flow modification
acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs
directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to
facilitate the funding of the ultimate im , prove ments needed to implement the street
closure or traffic flow modifications.
h. 'Me requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law.
PETMON KMUIR
The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City:
r. *o@\ac 11/95/ajp
a.The City Traffic Engineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated
impacts of the proposed street closure or Mffic flow modifications. This review will
include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element
of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with
engineering regulations, existing @c conditions, projected traffic conditions, the
potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for
the City or conflicts with future planned improvements.
b.The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of -the 'affected area' to be
petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes
are altered by the street closure or @c flow modifications, and/or properties which
are significantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted.
c.The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be
supported by a minimum of 75 percent of the total number of properties within the
"affected area.' Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property
owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure
or modifications in @c flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the
petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer that
at least 85 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and
have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow
modification or have signed a document indicating non-support for the street closure
or traffic flow modification.
d.At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following:
0 A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's polic
y that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic
flow modifications in order to facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to
implement the street closure or traffic flow modifications.
0A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic
flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area' must be provided.
The drawing must include changes in @c patterns anticipated as result of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
0The petition language must also clearly explain the location and nature of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
0The petition language and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by
the City Traffic Engineer prior tD circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to
be clearly understood.
0A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizing such street closure
or traffic flow modifications must be provided.
A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this policy.
.2- rk@\poticywc 11/95/sip
PETMON REVIEEW PROCESS
The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a proposed street
closure or trafflc flow modifications:
a.The City Tmffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all
petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is
autho@ by State law. Any petition.not complying with these requirements will not
be accepted for consideration.
b.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public
agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable,
these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California
Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility
companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit Agency, the
local office of California Department of Transportation and any other agencies
affected by the requested closure or @c flow modification.
C.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the
street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of st=ts may be
accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which
all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home
park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow
modifications or street closure has been received and verified by the City. The
purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the
greatest community support.
CM ACITON ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FTOW MODMCATTON
RWUESTS
Once a petition contains all of the required information and all of the matters described above
under 'Petition Review Process' have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare
a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for
the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or
permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Pubhc/Traffic
Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any
environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referml responses
received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review.
'ne City of Temecula Pubhc/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend against the
street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the
proposed street closure or @c flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten
days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to
all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals
the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to the decision, the 12
owner shall file a written notice of with the Doartment of Public Works. The
will be heard in accordance with the A@ @ss listed below, If the request is
recommended for @er consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after
-3- r\ \policv\gw@11/95/min
maidng any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or
@c flow modifications.
When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below:
a.A letter explaining the street closure or @c flow.modifications and the time and
place'when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property
owners, within the affected area prior to its installation.
b.All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying
motorists of upcoming Public Hearing.
C.A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be given
at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners in the affected
area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and
by a notice published in the newspaper.
d.Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street
closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs giving
notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications win also be erected at least
two weeks prior to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic
modifications.
e.In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the
City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California
Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21 101 or
21 100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or @c flow modification.
LA letter explaining the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all
property owners, within the affected area.
Tle CityCouncil has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify,
continueor den any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any
. y
support or lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or
deny a street closure or traffic flow modifications request will be by adoption of a formal
resolution.
11/95/ajp
DEPAR OF PUBIIC WORKS
PETMON TO CIA)SE OR MODEFY THE C FLOW ON S
BE AND
BY THE INSTALLATION OF (Nature of Chani!es)
AT @tion)
DATIE:
BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CrrY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR
MODIFICATION OF C FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS.
We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of
Temecula to on as
shown on the attached drawing.
All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in
all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to facilitate the
funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or @c flow modification.
Tle specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications
states:
All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted by the
proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map.
Our designated contact per-son is: Phone:
Signature Print Name Print Address
APPENDIX "All
R@ AM REGULATIONS: SUBJF= MAT=
VEEgCl,E CODE SECMON
21 100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution regarding the
following matters:
a.Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the highways.
h.Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passenger vehicles
for hire.
C.Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers.
d.Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of
Section 21400.
e.Regulating traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such
duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise
inoperable, at the scenes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic
direction for orderly traffic flow.
No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local
authority has submitted to the commissioner or to the chief law enforcement officer exercising jurisdiction
in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for
review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until
the commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer approves the proposed program. The
commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he
reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assigned to perform
the duty described in this subdivision.
f.Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons
authorized for such duty by the local authority.
g.Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose
principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority,
excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under
Section 11505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing agency licensed under Chapter 1 1
(commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its
registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and
county pursuant to Section 121 1 1.
h.Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically
disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks.
i.Providing for the appointment of nonstudent school crossing guards for the protection of
persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning
thereafter to a place of safety.
j.Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection
by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority.
k.Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall
regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a
traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as
determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified
time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that
further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No
person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless
(1) that person has been given the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control
point and then again passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning
and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by signs
that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local
ordinance or resolution on cruising.
1.Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire
lane, as described in Section 22500. 1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this
subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and
storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650).
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIEFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
VEMCLE CODE SECTION
21 100.1 Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits
the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on
or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the
Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400.
REGULATION OF E[IGHWAYS
VEMCLE CODE SECTION
21101. 'Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and
regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters:
a.Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having
jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic.
b.Designating any highway as a through highway and requiring that all vehicles observe official
traffic control devices before entering or crossing the highway or designating any intersection
as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the
intersection.
C.Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided
by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 1031) of
Chapter 5 of Part I of Division I of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted
pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which
is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance
which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote.
r @licy\sw
11/95/ajp
d.Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting
automobile driver @g programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state.
e.Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and
other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing.
f.Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic
barriers, or other roadway design features to implement the circulation element of a general
plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division
I of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this
subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local goverrunent to provide for the
health and safety of its citizens.
LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMIPORARELY CLOSE EEIGHWAY: C AL A
VEMCLE CODE SEC77ON
21101.4 (a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for
temporarily closing to through traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions
are, after a public hearing, found to exist.
1.'Me local authority finds and determines that there is serious and continual criminal activity
in the portion of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This finding and
determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case
of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriff's
department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
2.The highway has not been designated as a through highway or arterial street.
3. Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity.
4.The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emergency vehicles, the
performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of freight by commercial
vehicles in the area of the highway proposed to be temporarily closed.
(b)A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months,
except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not
more than 18 months.
r. \policyvw 11/95/ajp
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 7. 117IE711u=
Chairman Johnson requested public comments:
Isaac Lizarraga, 26875 Ynez Road, co-owner of Rancho Ford, agreed with the parking
restriction, however, he requested a delay in implementation to allow Rancho Ford
more time to secure additional parking. He requested the restriction be delayed till
April 1, 1996.
Commissioner Guerriero responded theit- an April timeline could be extreme because of
the potential accident factors existing at this location.
Dick Kennedy, 26755 Ynez Road, representative from Norm Reeves Group, spoke in
favor of the parking restriction and recommended it become effective immediately.
It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Coe to accept staff
recommendation and restrict parking on Ynez Road between the northerly entrance to the
Temecula Town Center and Solana Way.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Sander, Johnson
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Perry
4.Starlight Ridge Neighborhood Safety - Progress Report
Traffic Engineer Lauber presented the proposed "Policy for Closure or Modification of
Traffic Flow on Public Streets" for the Commission's review. This policy is being
proposed to the City Council on December 12, 1995. The information will be
contained in the Council Agenda Report and available to the public.
PU13LIC COMMENT
Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, resident of Starlight Ridge, thanked Engineer
Lauber for the traffic calming ideas and all his work toward this effort. He expressed
concern with the integrated approach and the implementation of these calming ideas.
He also spoke in opposition to the proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Cosmic
Drive and Rancho California Road. Over 200 residents in the Starlight Ridge homes
have signed a petition opposing this traffic signal.
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena Street, applauded the efforts of Engineer Lauber, however,
he wanted to reiterate the traffic problems that still exist in Starlight Ridge. He
expressed concern that 100% of home owners signatures could not be obtained.
Engineer Lauber responded that this would be considered.
Commissioner Coe reported that he had driven the Starlight Ridge area and hopes it will
be possible to resolve the problems soon.
Traffic Engineer Lauber recommended that Agenda Item 7 - Mar-garita Road and Cara Way -
Minutes.p/t. 1 2/07/95 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Publicfrraffic Safety Commission
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:February 22, 1996
SUBJECT:Item 2
Starlight Ridge - Community Traffic Calming Request
RECO@NDATION:
For Discussion Only
BACKGROUND:
On December 14, 1995 the City Council approved the City of Temecula. Policy for Closure or
Modification of Traffic Flow on Public Streets. This policy sets up the procedure for implementing
citizen based requests for traffic calming measures on a neighborhood scale.
After approval of the policy, a representative of the Starlight Ridge Home Owners Association (HOA)
requested a meeting to discuss viable options which could be implemented on Santa Cecilia Drive and
Cosmic Drive. Previous studies have indicated unacceptable speeds and approximate volumes needed to
qualify these streets for attention. The initial meeting was held on January 17, 1996 at City Hall. Mr.
Don Matson joined Mr. Ken Bruckman to brainstorm.ideas in order to formulate a project scope. At that
meeting two (2) major issues were raised.
The first item was their feelings that it was unreasonable for the citizens to finance any alternative. The
second item was specific concerns for the size of the effected areas formulated for each of the potential
traffic calming techniques.
At the conclusion of their concerns, I informed both residents that the current policy requires funding
from the proponents of the project and can not be modified without City Council approval. Tte rest of
the meeting was discussion with regard to the scope of alternatives with the associated effected areas
being defined. Ite option chosen was to stripe both roads with two (2) eight feet wide parking lanes,
two (2) four foot bike lanes and two (2) ten foot wide through lanes. Because the City does pay for the
striping of public streets, both citizens requested that staff look into funding this alternative with City
funds.
With the proposal defined, staff was requested to produce an associated cost estimate and clearly defme
the effected area to be petitioned. Because of a pending HOA meeting set for January 23, 1996, staff
agreed to meet on that day to supply the requested information.
At the meeting on January 23, 1996, both HOA representatives were informed that. residential streets are
not normally striped and that applying City funds to this project would not be appropriate and would set
a president contrary to our approved policy. Mr. Don Matson became enraged and stormed out of the
meeting. He felt that the proposed striping idea was forced on then and he found that to be unacceptable.
r.% \ag@\%\0222\ftulight- qwaip
I agreed that their proposed project should be exactly What our citizens want and Continued discussing
options with Mr. Bruck:man. At the conclusion of that meeting staff requested a formal written proposal
to be submitted to ensure that nobody was wasting anyones time on unacceptable proposals. Mr.
Bruckman was invited to discuss his concerns regarding financing improvements with our Commission
at the January 25, 1996 meeting.
As of February 14, 1996 no letter has been received by the Department of Public Works regarding
proposed traffic calming measures in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. Staff will continue to prioritize
this neighborhood for both police speed enforcement and radar trailer display unit placement.
F71SCAL IWACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
ic Dri
STARLIGHT RIODGE
LOCATION MAP
PUBLICfrRAFFIC COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22, 1996
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Guerriero, Coe, Perry, Sander
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
2.Starlight Ridge - Community Traffic Calming Reciuest (Discussion Only)
Traffic Engineer Lauber presented a summary of events and shared a letter from the
Starlight Ridge Home Owners'Association. They do not offer to financially assist with
the implementation of traffic calming devices and indicated they were upset to be
asked.
Lieutenant Domenoe reported that officers spent 1 5 hours during the month of
February in the Starlight Ridge area and only issued 5 citations for speeding. He also
reported the Radar trailer will be located in the neighborhood from 7:00 a.m. - 7:00
p.m. on a continuous basis.
Commissioner Perry invited other Commissioners to check on this for themselves from
3:00 - 5:00 p.m. He stated that he has been there and doesn't see a problem to the
extent that has been described. He also agreed to leave the trailer there for a longer
period of time.
Commissioner Sander stated that publicity could be the answer and to publish the
speed limit as 25 MPH in residential areas.
Engineer Lauber stated he has requested public information videos to educate the
citizens of Temecula on speed limits in residential areas.
Commissioner Guerriero asked if this could be a legal problem and could the City be
challenged in court. Engineer Lauber responded that this could not be challenged.
Commissioner Johnson stated that he has also visited the neighborhood and did not
see a problem with excessive speeds.
3. Bedford Court - Reciuest for Traffic Signal
Chairman Coe opened the Public Comment at 7:30 PM.
Cynthia Arocha, 44535 Bedford Court, spoke to express support and pleasure with the
proposal being submitted for the signal at Bedford Court and HWY 79S. She thanked
the Public Works Department and the Commission.
John Moramorco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, spoke to commend the Commission for the
fine job they have been doing.
Minutes.ptc.02\22\96 2
,NPPE DI)C
66B99
CITY OF TEMECULA
SOUTHER-N CROSS ROAD / WEST OF VIRGO COURT
24 HOUR SPEED COUNT
DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES
AUGUST 1995
co
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157012
SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCEBSP
EAS Page I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- TASDMP.THP 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 08/15 2 0 0 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 36
01:00 0 0 4 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33
6@:66 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34
03:00 2 1 4 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 26 29
04:00 0 0 2 9 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 34
05:00 0 2 3 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 28 33
06:00 0 0 5 10 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 34
07:00 0 1 5 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26 33
08:00 2 4 5 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 24 32
09:00 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 32
10:00 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 33
11:00 0 0 0 0 1 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Day Totals 7 8 34 66 64 11 2 192 28
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
07:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34
08:00 1 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34
09:00 1 0 2 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 33
10:00 3 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 28
11:00 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 33
Totals 12 11 50 82 79 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 251
Si)eed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH
kverage Speed - All Vehicies 0 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 PH
95th Percentile Speed 36 KR
10 MPH Pace Speed 0-9 MPH
HaMr of Vehicles in Pace 0
Percent of Vehicles in Pace .00%
Nuaber of Vehicles > 55 )H 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED
SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO
24 RR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41-
Tine 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
12:00 PM 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
12:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
12:45 2 0 0 4 0 0 0
Hour Total 2 0 0 6 4 3 0
01:00 PE 0 0
01:15 0 0
01:30 0 0
01:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
02:00 PM 1 0
02:15 0 0
02:30 0 0
02:45 0 0
Hour Total 1 0
03:00 PM 2 0
03:15 0 0
03:30 0 0
03:45 0 1
Hour Total 2 1
04:00 pi 0 0
04:15 0 0
04:30 0 0
04:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
05:00 PM 0 0
05:15 0 1
05:30 0 1
05:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 2
06:00 pi 0 0
06:15 0 0
06:30 0 0
06.-45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
07:00 PM 0 1
07:15 0 0
07:30 0 0
07:45 0
Hour Total 0 1
1 0 2 0 0
1 1 2 0 0
2 1 2 0 0
0 2 0 0 0
4 4 6 0 0
1 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 0
1 0 1 0 0
3 1 3 1 0
2 2 2 0 0
2 3 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0 0
4 8 3 0 0
1 3 2 0 0
0 3 2 0 1
0 1 1 1 0
1 2 4 1 0
2 9 9 2 1
0 3 3 0 0
0 2 0 0 0
2 3 6 0 0
1 2 1 1 0
3 10 10 1 0
1 1 3 0 1
1 5 6 1 0
1 4 2 1 0
2 0 0 0 0
5 10 11 2 1
1 1 1 2 0
0 1 0 0 0
2 2 1 0 0
2 2 1 0 0
5 6 3 2 0
909.247.6716
EASTBOUND
46- 51- 56- 61-
50 55 60 65 70
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Site Code : 157012
Start Date: 08/15/95
File I.D. TESCEBSP
Page 1
TASDMP.TNP 50th 85th
999 Total Pct. Pct.
0 3 32 34
0 2 29 39
0 4 34 37
0 6 26 28
0 15 29
0 3 32 34
0 4 29 32
0 5 24 32
0 2 27 29
0 14 28
0 3 24 34
0 2 29 39
0 2 24 34
0 2 24 34
0 9 24
0 8 24 32
0 5 24 28
0 2 29 34
0 3 27 29
0 18 26
0 6 28 32
0 6 29 34
0 3 34 39
0 8 31 34
0 23 30
0 6 29 33
0 3 27 29
0 12 29 33
0 5 27 34
0 26 28
0 6 31 34
0 13 29 33
0 8 28 34
0 2 22 24
0 29 29
0 6 29 37
0 1 29
0 5 24 29
0 5 24 29
0 17 26
CITY OF TERECULA
SOUTHM CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NDON WED
Begin 0- 16-
Time 15 20
08:00 pi 0 0
08:15 1 1
08:30 0 2
08:45 1 1
Hour Total 2 4
09:00 PM 0 0
09:15 0 0
09:30 0 0
09:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
10:00 PI 0 0
10:15 0 0
10:30 0 0
10:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
11:00 PI 0 0
11:15 0 0
11:30 0 0
11:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
Day Totals 7 8
12:00 08/116 0 0
12:15 0 0
12:30 0 0
12:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
01:00 at 0 0
01:15 0 0
01:30 0 0
01:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
02:00 at
0 0
02:15 0 0
02:30 0 0
02:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
03:00 at 0 0
03:15 0 1
03:30 0 0
03:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 1
21- 26- 31- 36- 41-
25 30 35 40 45
1 1 4 0 0
3 2 2 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0
5 4 7 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
1 3 1 0 0
0 1 1 0 0
3 4 2 0 0
0 1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 2 1 0 0
0 0 3 0 0
0 4 5 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
34 66 64 11 2
0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 1 2 1 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 0
COUNTS IJNLIMITED
909.247.6716
EASTBOUND
46- 51- 56- 61-
50 55 60 65 70
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Site Code : 157012
Start Date: 08/15/95
File I.D. TESCEBSP
Page 2
TASDMP.TMP 50th 85th
999 Total Pct. Pct.
0 6 31 33
0 9 23 32
0 3 19 24
0 4 19 29
0 22 24
0 1 24
0 1 24
0 5 26 29
0 2 29 34
0 9 26
0 2 29 34
0 1 29
0 3 29 34
0 3 33 34
0 9 29
0 1 34
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
192 28
0 1 34
0 1 29
0 1 39
0 1 34
0 4 32
0 0
0 1 34
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2 19 29
0 1 34
0 0
0 3 29
CITY OF TNECULA
SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED
Beqin 0- 16-
Time 15 20
04:00 as 0 0
04:15 0 0
04:30 0 0
04:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
05:00 am 0 0
05:15 0 0
05:30 0 0
05:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
06:00 am 0 0
06:15 0 0
06:30 0 0
06:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
07:00 am 0 0
07:15 0 0
07:30 0 0
07:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
08:00 an 0 0
08:15 0 0
08:30 0 0
08:45 1 0
Hour Total 1 0
09:00 am 0 0
09:15 1 0
09:30 0 0
09:45 0 0
Hour Total 1
0
10:00 am 0 0
10:15 0 2
10:30 0 0
10:45 3 0
Hour Total 3 2
11:00 am 0 0
11:15 0 0
11:30 0 0
11:45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0
Totals 12 11
21- 26- 31- 36- 41-
25 30 35 40 45
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 1 0
2 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0
2 3 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
3 3 1 1 0
1 0 1 0 0
0 3 3 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 1 0
2 5 4 1 0
1 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
3 3 1 0 0
1 1 1 0 0
2 1 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 0
1 0 1 0 0
4 2 4 0 0
50 82 79 15 2
COUNTS UI(LIMITED
909.247.6716
EASTBOUND
46- 51- 56- 61-
50 55 60 65 70
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Site Code : 157012
Start Date: 08/15/95
File I.D. TESCEBSP
Page 3
TASDMP.7MP 50th 85th
999 Total Pct. Pct.
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1 24
0 1 24
0 0
0 2 22
0 0
0 1 34
0 2 29 39
0 2 22 24
0 5 24
0 2 24 39
0 0
0 5 24 28
0 2 34
0 9 24
0 2 24 34
0 7 29 33
0 1 * 24
0 3 29 39
0 13 27
0 2 24 29
0 2 17 19
0 3 29 34
0 5 24
0 12 21
0 3 29 34
0 3 24 29
0 2 32 34
0 2 24 34
0 10 27
0 251
CITY OF TEMEM COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009
SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. TESCWBSP
WESTBOM Paae 1
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 08/15 0 1 2 1 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 37
01:00 0 0 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 33
01:06 0 1 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 c 12 31 36
03:00 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33
04:00 0 0 0 3 5 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 32 38
011:00 1 0 0 2 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 32 38
C,6:00 0 0 1 8 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 37
07:00 0 0 1 3 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 34
08:00 0 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 -11 34
09:00 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 29 37
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39
Day T3tals 1 2 7 31 41 57 30 5 1 175 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44
)1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
32:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44
)4:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
)5:00 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
)6.,OO 0 0 0 4 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 34
)7:00 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 33
)8:00 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 39
)9:00 0 1 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 33
@0:00 0 0 1 3 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 36
-1:00 0 0 2 2 4 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 34
'otals 1 3 12 51 65 94 43 12 1 0 0 0 0 282
;NO Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 30 MR
Average Speed - All Vehicles 30 MPH
85th Percentile speed 36 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Nuiaber of Vehicles in Pace 159
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 56.20%
N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 WE: .00%
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009
SMTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. T P
WESTBOUND Page 1
Beqin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85tb
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 ---50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 37
12:15 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
12:30 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 29
i 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 37
Hour Total 0 1 2 1 6 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28
01:00 pill 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
01:30 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 32
01:45 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 1 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27
02:00 pi 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37
02:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
02:30 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 1 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 31
03:00 pi 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
03:15 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
03:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31
04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37
04:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 39
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
04:45 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 5 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 32
05:00 pm 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
05:15 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 39
05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 '24 44
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Hour Total 1 0 0 2 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 32
06:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37
06:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 39
06:30 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 6 23 34
06:45 0 0 1 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 37
Hour Total 0 0 1 8 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 29
07:00 pm 0 0 0 1 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 34
07:15 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 34
07:30 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29
07:45 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 1 3 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28
CITY OF TEECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009
SOUMERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUES/NOC)N WED File I.D. T P
WESTBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 PE 0 0 0 3 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 34
08:15 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
08:30 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
08:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
Hour Total 0 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 31
09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
09:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
09:45 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 33
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 31
10:00 PE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
10:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37
Day Totals 1 2 7 31 41 57 30 5 1 175 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39
01:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42
CITY OF @ECULA COUKS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157009
SOUTHERN CROSS/WEST OF VIRGO 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUES/NOON WED File I.D. TE@'BSP
WES7BOUND Page 3
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19
05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19
06:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
06:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
06:30 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
06:45 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 29
07:00 an 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34
07:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
07:30 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34
07:45 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28
08:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
08:15 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29
08:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 42
08:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31
09:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
09:15 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22 24
09:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 '29 32
09:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Hour Total 0 1 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24
10:00 as 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34
10:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
10:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
10:45 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34
Hoiz Total 0 0 1 3 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29
11:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 39
11:15 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 29
11:30 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
11:45 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 2 4 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 31
Totals 1 3 12 51 65 94 43 12 1 0 0 0 0 282
CITY OF TEMECULA
ASTEROID WAY / BETWEEN MILKEY WAY DRIVES
24 HOUR SPEED COUNT
DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES
AUGUST 1995
'-5424 Jccilyn A,er,@ l@o,eno %role,, 72---57
CITY OF TEMECULA COWS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016
ASTEROID WAY/BET HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEASNBSP
NORTHBOUND 1
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 60 65 999 Total Pct. PCt.
12:00 08/15 1 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 36 38
01:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34
02:00 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 42
03:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
04:00 0 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 34 37
05:00 1 0 2 0 2 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 32 39
06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 39
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 39
08:00 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 39
09:00 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 38
10:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 24 44
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Day Totals 2 1 7 11 14 21 24 10 2 1 92 32
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39
06:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44
07:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 39 44
08:00 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 39
09:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 38 42
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 0 0 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 34
Totals 3 4 10 16 23 25 37 19 3 0 0 0 0 140
Speed Statistics
15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 32 MPH
Average Speed - All vehicles 32 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 40 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 43 ?H
10 MPH Pace Speed 31-40 MPH
NnMr of Vehicles in Pace 62
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 44.061
Number of vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
CITY- OF TEMECULA ODUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016
ASTEROID WAY/BET MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 BR SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TEASNBSP
NORTHBOUND Page I
Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 36 39
12:30 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39
12:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Hour Total 1 0 1 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 36
01:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
01:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28
02:00 pit 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 44
02:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
02:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 44
02:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 29
03:00 pi 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29
04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 39
04:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 39
04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36 38
04:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 34
05:00 pia 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
05:15 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 34
05:30 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 '34 39
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 1 0 2 0 2 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 32
06:00 pi 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 34
06:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 32
07:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 36
CITY-OF TEMECULA COUNTS UlfLINITED Site Code : 157016
ASTEROID WAY/BET MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED file I.D. TEKSNBSP
NORTHBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 PR 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44
08:30 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 19
09:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
09:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
09:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
09:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 37 39
Hour Total 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
10:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 19 49
10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 44
Hour Total 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 24
11:00 pin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Day Totals 2 1 7 11 14 21 24 10 2 92 32
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 44
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29
01:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CITY-OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157016
ASTEROID WAY/BET HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEASNBSP
NO Page 3
Bqin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39
05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38
06:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44
Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 39
07:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
07:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 39 44
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 39
08:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44
08:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
08:30 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34
08:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
Hour Total 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29
09:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 44
09:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39
09:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 44
Hour Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 38
10:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 0 0 0
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 as 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
11:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 39
11:45 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26
Totals 3 4 10 16 23 25 37 19 3 0 0 0 0 140
CITY OF T@U COMS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011
)-STEROID WAY/BET THE HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/MOON TUE/NOON i'ED File I.D. TFJ.SSBSP
UND Page I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 2E- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 081115 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 27 33
01:00 3 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33
02:00 1 2 1 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 34
03:00 0 3 2 3 4 . I L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 33
04:00 0 0 2 3 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,0 34 38
o@,:OO 2 0 1 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 31 36
06:00 0 1 5 5 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 36
07:00 C, 3 1 5 5 2 C. 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 34
03:00 0 1 C, 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 13 29 34
09:00 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 39
10:00 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 39
11:00 0 0 0 1 1 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Lay Totals 6 11 21 43 53 27 3 2 1 167 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
01:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k
03:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38 39
08:00 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 33
09:00 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 33
10:00 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 33
11:00 2 0 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 33
Totals 8 12 30 54 76 32 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 218
Speed Statistics
15th Percentile Sp 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th Percentile): 30 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 30 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 38 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 130
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59-50%
Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
CITY-OF TERECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011
ASTEROID WAY/BET THE MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08@115/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/XOON WED File I.D. TFKSSBSP
- SOMWUND Page I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pi 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
12:15 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29
12:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
12:45 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
Hour Total 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 27
01:00 PM 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
01:15 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32 33
01:30 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 29
01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'k 34
Hour Total 3 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 29
02:00 pi 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 34
02:15 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 37
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28
Hour Total 1 2 1 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27
03:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
03:15 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34
03:30 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32
03:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
Hour Total 0 3 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
04:15 0 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 34 39
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 37 39
04:45 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 3 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 34
05:00 PI 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
05:15 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
05:30 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 '29 37
05:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 2 0 1 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 31
06:00 PM 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
06:30 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 34
06:45 0 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 28 31-,
Hour Total 0 1 5 5 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 30
07:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
07:15 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 32
07:30 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
07:45 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34
Hour Total 0 3 1 5 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 28
CITY- OF TERECULK COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011
ASTEROID WAY/BET THE HILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEKSSBSP
SOUTHBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 PR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:30 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 32
08:45 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 37
Hour Total 0 1 0 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 29
09:00 Pt 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
09:15 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
09:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
09:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
Hour Total 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29
10:00 PM 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
10:15 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 49
10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 29
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29
Day Totals 6 11 21 43 53 27 3 2 1 167 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 39
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
01:00 at 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .29 34
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29
02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 am 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24
CITY OF.TFRECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157011
ASIEROID WAY/BET THE MILKEY WAYS 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TUMBSP
UND Pace 3
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
05:00 all 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 38
08:00 at 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 32
08:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
08:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
08:45 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
Hour Total 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24
09:00 an 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
09:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
09:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -32 34
09:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29
10:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 33
10:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
10:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32
11:00 at 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
11:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
11:30 1 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 33
11:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
Hour Total 2 0 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28
Totals 8 12 30 54 76 32 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 218
CITY OF TEMECULA
COSMIC DRIVE/SOUTH OF NORTH STAR COURT
24 HOUR SPEED COUNT
DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES
AUGUST 1995
cc
cr,- vclle,
CITY OF TE14ECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006
COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIK 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TECONBSP
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Tlle 15 65 70 999. Total P
12:00 08/15 1 1 1 8 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 28 41
01:00 2 0 4 5 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 33
02:00 3 0 4 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 32
03:00 2 2 8 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 27 33
04:00 0 2 3 it 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33
05:00 1 0 8 13 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 28 33
06:00 0 0 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29 33
07:00 0 2 10 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26 31
08:00 0 2 5 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 32
09:00 0 0 5 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28 33
10:00 0 1 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 29
11:00 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Day Totals 9 11 54 126 82 16 7 'k 305 27
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:00 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
03:00 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 34
04:00 0 0 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 34
05:00 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 32
06:00 0 1 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33
07:00 0 0 2 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 28 32
08:00 0 1 4 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 33
09:00 0 2 5 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26 31
10:00 0 0 6 14 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28 34
11:00 0 3 1 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 34
Totals 9 21 81 207 128 29 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
SNed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
8@th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@r of Vehicles in Pace 335
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 68.87%
Nuiaber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
'CITY OF TZRECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006
COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEFD/NODN TUE/NOC)N WED File I.D. TECONBSP
NORTHBOUND Page 1
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 Pt 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34
12:15 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
12:30 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 42
12:45 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44
Hour Total 1 1 1 8 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 28
01:00 pin 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
01:15 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
01:30 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32
01:45 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37
Hour Total 2 0 4 5 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28
02:00 Pt 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28
02:15 1 0 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31
02:30 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34
02:45 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 29
Hour Total 3 0 4 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 27
03:00 pm 2 0 3 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 33
03:15 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 22 29
03:30 0 0 0 6 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 34
03:45 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 2 2 8 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 27
04:00 pm 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 32
04:15 0 1 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34
04:30 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32
04:45 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33
Hour Total 0 2 3 18 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28
05:00 PI 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33
05:15 0 0 3 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 34
05:30 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 -31 34
05:45 0 0 2 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33
Hour Total 1 0 8 13 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 28
06:00 pia 0 0 2 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 32 33
06:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
06:30 0 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33
06:45 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 28
Tour Total 0 0 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29
07:00 pm 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23 32
07:15 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 28
07:30 0 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31
07:45 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 32
Hour Total 0 2 10 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 26
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006
COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECONMP
NORTHBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 -40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 Po 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 34
08:15 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29
08:30 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32
08:45 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 29
Hour Total 0 2 5 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27
09:00 PM 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 34
09:15 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 7 29 33
09:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
09:45 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
Hour Total 0 0 5 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 28
10:00 PM 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 39
10:15 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27
10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
10:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 1 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 27
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
11:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29
Hour Total 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28
Day Totals 9 11 54 126 82 16 7 305 27
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
01:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
02:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:15 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24
03:00 am
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:45 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
Hour Total 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27
CITY OF TERCULK MMS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157006
COSMIC DR/S/o P-KNCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECONBSP
NORTHBOUND Page 3
B.egin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
04:15 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
04:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
04,.45 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
Hour Total 0 0 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27
05:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
05:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
05:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
05:45 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28
06:00 am 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29
06:15 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
06:30 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
06:45 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 28
Hour Total 0 1 3 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28
07:00 am 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29
07:15 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29
07:30 0 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 34
07:45 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 29
Hour Total 0 0 2 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 28
08:00 am 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34
08:15 0 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 29 33
08:30 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
08:45 0 1 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 29
Hour Total 0 1 4 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28
09:00 an 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 32
09-15 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 26 28
09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 '29 39
09:45 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 0 2 5 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 26
10:00 an 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32
10:15 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 37
10:30 0 0 2 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 28 33
10:45 0 0 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 34
Hour Total 0 0 6 14 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28
11:00 am 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29
11:15 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
11:30 0 3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 33
11:45 0 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 38
Hour Total 0 3 1 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 28
Totals 9 21 81 207 128 29 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
COU"S UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001
CITY OF TEMECULA
COSMIC DR/S/0 WCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TOE/NOON WED File I.D. TE,@BSP
;OMIMOUND I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 11- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Tive - 15 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total.,,, Pct. Pct.
12:00 08/15 2 0 11 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 32
01:00 1 1 3 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33
02:00 0 4 8 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26 29
03:00 0 1 8 24 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 39 27 29
04:00 1 1 9 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 27 34
05:00 1 1 15 20 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 54 27 34
06:00 0 1 5 16 5 6 C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 36
07:00 1 2 11 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 24 33
08:00 2 4 8 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 14 26 29
09:00 1 4 5 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 32
10:00 0 0 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33
11:00 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 37
Day Totals 10 20 87 155 59 32 3 366 27
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
01:00 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
02:00 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34
03:00 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22 34
04:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
05:00 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 33
06:00 0 0 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 32
07:00 2 0 5 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 33
08:00 0 2 11 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26 31
09:00 0 2 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 32
10:00 2 0 6 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 27 33
11:00 0 1 7 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 26 28
Totals 15 29 125 227 89 42 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 531
SReed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 27 "H
85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 21-30 MPH
N@ of Vehicles in Pace 352
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.28%
NuEber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
.001
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MR:
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001
COSMIC DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TECOSBSP
SOUTHBOUND Page I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pm 0 0 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 31
12:15 0 0 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 32
12:30 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 24
12:45 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 22 29
Hour Total 2 0 11 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 27
01:00 PE 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
01:15 0 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 39
01:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
01:45 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 29
Hour Total 1 1 3 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 28
02:00 ps 0 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32
02:15 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 27
02.-30 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 24
02:45 0 3 1 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 29
Hour Total 0 4 8 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26
03:00 pi 0 0 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 29
03:15 0 1 2 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 29
03:30 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32
03:45 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 29
Hour Total 0 1 8 24 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 27
04:00 pi 0 1 3 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26 29
04:15 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 34
04:30 0 0 4 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 28 34
04:45 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34
Hour Total 1 1 9 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 27
05:00 pm 0 1 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34
05:15 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 23 28
05:30 0 0 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 -29 34
4 17 36
05:45 1 0 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
Hour Total 1 1 15 20 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 27
6
06:00 pi 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29
06:15 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 38
06:30 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
06:45 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 34
Hour Total 0 1 5 16 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 28
07:00 pi 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34
07:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
07:30 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 37
07-.45 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 32
Hour Total 1 2 11 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 24
CITY Gf TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001
Cdsmic DR/S/0 RANCHO CKLIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEEDINOOK TUE/NOOK WED File I.D. TECOSBSP
SOUTHBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 Ps 1 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27 34
08:15 1 1 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 29
08:30 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 28
08:45 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 34
Hour Total 2 4 8 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 26
09:00 pin 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 29
09:15 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 29
09:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
09:45 1 1 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 29
Hour Total 1 4 5 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26
10:00 PM 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32
10:15 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
10:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
10:45 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 2 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28
11:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
11:15 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
11:30 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 24
11:45 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
Hour Total 1 1 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26
Day Totals 10 20 87 155 59 32 3 366 27
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
12:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27
01:00 am 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 19
01:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hoiz Total 0 2
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27
02:00 an 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
02:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
Hour Total 0 1 1 2 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27
03:00 am 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
03:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
03:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
03:45 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 24
Hour Total 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157001
CDSHIC DR/S/0 WCHO CALIFORNIA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TECOSBSP
- so Page 3
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27
05:00 am 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
05:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31
06:00 am 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 29
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
06:45 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27
07:00 am 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 37
07:15 1 0 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33
07:30 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 28
07:45 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34
Hour Total 2 0 5 11 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 27
08:00 am 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 28
08:15 0 0 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34
08:30 0 1 4 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 27 31
08:45 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 26 32
Hour Total 0 2 11 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 26
09:00 am 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
09:15 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34
09:30 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 24
09:45 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29
Hour Total 0 2 4 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 26
10:00 am 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 34
10:15 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29
10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 29
10:45 1 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 34
Hour Total 2 0 6 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 27
11:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
11:15 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
11:30 0 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 28
11:45 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29
Hour Total 0 1 7 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 26
Totals 15 29 125 227 89 42 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 531
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENA STREET / WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE
24 HOUR SPEED COUNT
DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES
AUGUST 1995
CITY-OF TEHECUU COUNTS UlfLIMITED Site Code : 15700-i
AGENA STNMT OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TUGEBSP
WTBOUND Page
Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
12:00 pm 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
01:00 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28
02:00 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 33
03:00 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 27
04:00 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 42
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 42 43
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 42 43
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 42 44
09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 42 44
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43
Day Totals 4 4 6 12 4 1 72 103 41
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42 43
10:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 42
11:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
Totals 0 4 4 7 15 5 2 101 0 0 0 0 0 138
Si>eed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 27 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 41 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 38 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 43 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 44 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 36-45 MPH
Nuber of Vehicles in Pace 103
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 74.101
Nimber of Vehicles ) 55 KH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
CUUN,6 UhLiMii@ED Site Coae : 157uO',,
AGENA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGEBSP
FASTBOUND Page
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19
01:00 Ps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 24
01:30 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 27
01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24
02:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
02:30 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
02:45 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28
03:00 pi 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 29
03:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14
03:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19
04:00 pi 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:15 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29
04:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 42 44
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 24
05:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42
06:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 42
07:00 pa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 'k 44
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 42
CITI OF TE14ECUiA COURTS UhLiHiiEi) 61te Cooe : i@', UL) /
AGE'NA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGEBSP
EASTBOUND Page
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85tb
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 pi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 42 43
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 42
09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44
09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 42 43
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43 44
10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 42
11:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42
Day Totals 4 4 6 12 4 1 72 103 41
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
12:45 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
01:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 .43 44
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43
02:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42
03:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,-III ut lLML@u@ CUUNI@ UhLiMi@@ 3iLe (-O(le : i@ivu;
AGENA ST/WEST Of COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOC)N TUE/NOON WED file I.D. TEAG@P
EASTBOUND Page 3
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42
05:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42
07:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 43
08:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42
09:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43
09:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 44
09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 42 43
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 42
10:00 an 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 44
10:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
10:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29
11:00 at 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
11:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29
Totals 0 4 4 7 15 5 2 101 0 0 0 0 0 138
AGENA ST/MT OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/M TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGWBSP
WESTBOUND Page I
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50rtb 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pa 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32
01:00 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 37
02:00 0 0 2 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24 28
03:00 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 c 10 26 34
04:00 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32
05:00 0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 29
06:00 0 0 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28 33
07:00 1 3 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 28
08:00 1 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 10 23 28
09:00 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 27
10:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
11:00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
Day Totals 2 6 8 30 36 13 4 1 100 25
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 19
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
08:00 0 0 0 4 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 36
09:00 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 34
10:00 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 32
11:00 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 24
Totals 2 7 9 46 47 19 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 139
SDee statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 20 MPH
Median Speed (50rth percentile): 26 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 26 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 21-30 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 93
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.51%
Nwaber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
Cill @i L@CULA cuuhlb UNLimiiLv @ite LOGE : iD/ju@
kGtNA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TEAGWBSP
- WESTBOUND Page I
Begin 0- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
12:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
Hour Total 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27
01:00 PE 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 37
01:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 29
01:30 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28
02:00 pt 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 39
02:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
02:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
02:45 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 28
Hour Total 0 0 2 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 24
03:00 pm 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
03:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
03:30 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
03:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 26
04:00 pm 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
04:15 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27
04:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:45 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27
05:00 pie 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
05:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
05:30 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 .27 28
05:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 34
Hour Total
0 1 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26
06:00 PI 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
06:45 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 24
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 28
07:00 pa 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
07:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 24
07:30 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 24
07:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
Hour Total 3 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21
ITY Of TEHECULA
GENA ST/WEST OF COSHIC STREET
@4 HR SpEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED
o- 11- 16-
lime
18:00 pi 1 0 0
)8:15 0 0 0
)8:30 0 1 0
)9:00 Pla 0 0 0
09:15 0 0 1
09:30 0 0 0
19-45 0 0
H, Total 0 0 1
10:00 PE 0 0 0
10:15 0 0 0
10:30 0 0 0
10,45 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0
11:00 pia 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 1
Hour Total 0 0 1
Day Totals 2 6 a
12:00 08/16 0 0 0
12:15 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0
. 5 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0
01:00 at 0 0 0
01:15 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0
01:45 0
Hour Total 0 0 0
02:00 at 0 0 0
02:15 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0
0 0 0
Hour Total
03:00 aii 0 0 0
03:15 0 0 1
03:30 0 0 0
03:45 0
Hour Total 0 1 1
36-
21- 26- 31-
5 30 35 40
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
4 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
30 36 13 4
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
909.247.6716
COURTS UNLINITED
41- 46- 51- 56-
45 50 55
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1
0 0 0 0
1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
@ " -11@ . @-;,--
Start Date: 08 ' /15!95
File I.D. TEAGWBSP
Page . - 2
61- 66- 50th 85th
65 999
0 0 3 24 29
0 0 1 24
0 0 4 24 27
0 0 10 23
0
0 0 2 19 29
0 0 1 29
0 5 22
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 2 22 24
0 2 22
0
0 0 2 24 29
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 3 24
100 25
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1 29
0 0 0
0 1
0 0 0
0 0 1 19
0 0 0
0 0 2 14
CITY Uf 'iLHL(-ULA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/115/95
AGENA ST/WEST OF COSMIC STREET File I.D. TEAGWBSP
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED 3
Bqin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
9 Total Pct. Pct.
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
our 0
05:00 aa 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
0 0
05:45 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24
06:00 aN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 am 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:00 am 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
08:30 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 37
08:45 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 27
09:00 air 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
09:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
09:30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 24
0 0 0 0
09:
- 0 0 0 0 0 7 27
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
10,00 as 0 0 0 1
10:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
10:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24
11:00 av 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 22 24
11:15 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
0 0 0 0 94
11:45 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22
Totals 2 7 9 46 47 19 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 139
CITY OF TEMECULA
SANTA CELILIA DRIVE / SOUTH OF AGENA STREET
24 HOUR SPEED COUNT
DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES
AUGUST 1995
co
2542/ Jac@yn A,e@,,c
CITY OF TEMECULA coMS LTHLINITED Site Code : 157008
SANTA CELILIk/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15)195
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/KOON WED File I.D. TESCNBSP
NO Page 1
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 30 35 40 45 - 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 08/15 1 0 2 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 38
01:00 2 0 1 7 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 28 37
02:00 0 0 0 9 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 36
03:00 0 0 5 15 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 36
04:00 0 0 6 7 9 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 32 39
05:00 0 1 5 6 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31. 37
06:00 0 0 0 6 9 2 0 1 0 c 0 G. 0 15 31 34
07:00 0 0 4 12 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 29 34
08:00 0 0 0 4 4 10 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 21 36 39
09:00 0 1 2 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 37
10:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 39
11:00 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 c c 0 5 29 34
Day Totals 3 2 25 74 82 56 9 3 2 1 1 258 31
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 49
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
04:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 33 34
05:00 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 34 39
06:00 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34
07:00 0 0 0 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 37
08:00 0 1 1 7 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 32 38
09:00 0 0 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 37
10:00 0 0 2 5 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 32 38
11:00 0 0 0 3 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 33 39
Totals 3 3 30 101 126 89 16 5 2 1 0 0 1 377
SRND Statistics '
15th Percentile S@ 26 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 32 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 32 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 38 K?ff
95th Percentile Speed 42 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 227
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.22%
NuMr of Vehicles ) 55 MPH 1
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .27%
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008
SAKA CELILIA/S/0 AGEM 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOOM TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCNBSP
NORTHBOUND Page I
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 PM 1 0 0 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32 38
12:15 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 34
12:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 1 0 2 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 32
01:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34
01:15 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
01:30 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 28 34
01:45 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 29
Hour Total 2 0 1 7 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 28
02:00 pi 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 28
02:15 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 37
02:30 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
02:45 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 33 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 9 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31
03:00 PM 0 0 3 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 33
03:15 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 34
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39
03:45 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 5 15 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28
04:00 PM 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 38
04:15 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 34 43
04:30 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
04:45 0 0 2 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 31 38
Hour Total 0 0 6 7 9 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 32
05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 33 38
05:15 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 38
05:30 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 '29 33
05:45 0 0 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29 38
Hour Total 0 1 5 6 11 10 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 39
06:15 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
06:30
0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34
06:45 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 6 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 31
07:00 PM 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 29 34
07-15 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 31 33
07:30 0 0 1 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 36
07:45 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 34
Hour Total 0 0 4 12 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 29
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008
S@A CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/195
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. T P
NO@UND 2
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 PR 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 38
08:15 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
08:30 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 34 52
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 37 38
Hour Total 0 0 0 4 4 10 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 21 36
09:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 24
09:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
09:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 39 44
09:45 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33
Hour Total 0 1 2 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32
10:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 39
10:15 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 32 34
10:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 34
11:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
11:15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
11:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
11:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29
Day Totals 3 2 25 74 82 56 9 3 2 1 1 258 31
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 49
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
01:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 am
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 as 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157008
SAITA CELILIA/S/0 A(;ENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15 ' /95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESMP
NORTHBOUND Page 3
Begin 0- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 71- 50th 85th
Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'k A
04:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
04:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 33
05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
05:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
05:45 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 34
06:00 am 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28
07:00 an 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
07:30 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
07:45 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 32
08:00 am 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 34 39
08:15 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 29
08:30 0 0 1 2 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 38
08:45 0 0 0 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 42
Hour Total 0 1 1 7 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 32
09:00 am 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28
09:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
09:30 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 '29 34
09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44
Hour Total 0 0 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29
10:00 as 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 34 38
10:15 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 37
1 1 3 0 0
10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 34 38
10:45 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 5 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 32
11:00 am 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
11:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
11:30 0 0 0 2 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 33 38
11:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 33
Totals 3 3 30 101 126 89 16 5 2 1 0 0 1 377
CITY OF TEFICULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157015
SUTA CELILIk/S/0 AGENK 909.247.6716 Start Date- 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP
- so Page I
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 pt plir 0 0 0 2 10 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 28 34
01:00 0 0 1 1 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 31 34
02:00 0 0 2 8 10 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 33
03:00 0 0 0 5 9 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 31 36
04:00 0 0 0 3 10 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 30 36
05:00 0 C, 0 2 11 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 30 34
06:00 0 0 0 5 a 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 28 34
07:00 0 0 0 3 16 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33
08:00 0 0 1 1 4 12 1 0 0 0 0 c 24 32 37
09:00 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 32 39
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 37 39
11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
Day Totals 4 32 83 89 30 9 1 1 1 ir 250 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37 39
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44 54
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 33 39
07:00 0 0 0 1 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 31 37
08:00 0 0 0 9 20 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 30 35
09:00 0 0 0 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33
11:00 0 0 2 0 9 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 31 37
Totals 0 0 6 47 131 144 56 12 2 2 1 0 0 401
SR2ed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 25 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 30 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 31 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 275
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 68.411
N@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 1
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .251
CITY OF'TfXECULk COUNTS UlfLIMITED Site Code : 157015
SAkk CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 ER SPEED/NOON TUE/NODN WED File I.D. TESCSBSP
SOUTEBOUND Page I
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50tb 85th
Tiiie 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 PM 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 29
12:15 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 37
12:30 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
12:45 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 10 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 28
01:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 44
01:15 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 44
Hour Total 0 0 1 1 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 31
02:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 27 34
02:15 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 28
02:30 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 29
02:45 0 0 0 4 3 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 34
Hour Total 0 0 2 8 10 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 27
03:00 PM 0 0 0 5 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 31 37
03:15 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
03:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 39
03:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 32
Hour Total 0 0 0 5 9 16 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 31
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 34
04:15 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
04:30 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37
04:45 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 10 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 .0 27 30
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 39
05:15 0 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 34
05:30 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 33
05:45 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 11 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 30
06:00 pii 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 29
06:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
06:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 37
06:45 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 24 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 5 8 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 28
07:00 pt 0 0 0 1 8 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33
07:15 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
07:30 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 32
07:45 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 3 16 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31 28
CITY OF TLXCULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site Code : 157015
SANTA CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 081/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOON TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP
SOUTHBOUND Page 2
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
08:00 Pt 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 37
08:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 39
08:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 34
08:45 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34
Hour Total 0 0 1 1 4 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 32
09:00 PE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:15 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
09:30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
09:45 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 32 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 32
10:00 PR 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36 38
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 34 49
10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 37
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
11:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
Day Totals 4 32 83 89 30 9 1 1 1 250 30
12:00 08/16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 37
01:00 at 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 29
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
01:15 0 0 0 0 1 * 34
01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:45 0 0 0 0 0 *
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29
02:00 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:15
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44 54
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 44
03:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
03:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
CITY Of TEMECULA COUI(TS UNLIKITED Site Code : 157015
SAKTA CELILIA/S/0 AGENA 909.247.6716 Start Date: 08/15/95
24 HR SPEED/NOOK TUE/NOON WED File I.D. TESCSBSP
UND Page 3
Begin 0- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 66- 50th 85th
Time 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 999 Total Pct. Pct.
04:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
04:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
05:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
05:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
05:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
06:00 am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
06:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 33
07:00 as 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
07:15 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 37
07:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 34
07:45 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 37
Hour Total 0 0 0 1 7 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 31
08:00 am 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 33
08:15 0 0 0 4 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34
08:30 0 0 0 4 9 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 31 34
08:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 36 38
Hour Total 0 0 0 9 20 24 10 0 0 0 0 0 '0 63 30
09:00 an 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 24 28
09:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:30 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 29
09:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
Hour Total 0 0 0 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 26
10:00 an 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
10:15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
10:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
10:45 0 0 0 0 2 27 29
Hour Total 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31
11:00 ax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
11:30 0 0 0 0 5 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 38
11:45 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 39
Hour Total 0 0 2 0 9 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 31
Totals 0 0 6 47 131 144 56 12 2 2 1 0 0 401
CWHTS UNLIKITED Site 152509
CM OF TENECCIA Start!Date': 03@20/96
COSHICIBET TWILIG7ET & Kom STAR 909.247.6716
7 DkY COM File i,.D. '; TECDSNB
NO"MU)FD
Bqin 0- 6- II- !6- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- EOtb *51t
713- 5 10 15 20 25 31 otal I
12:00 03/20
01.00
02:00
03:00 k
04:00 k
05:00 t
06:00
07:00 k i k k kl k
08:00 ki k
09:00 k t k *1 k
10:00
12:00 PR k
01:00
02:00 k i
03:00
04:00 0 0 0 5 5 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 2611 @32
05:00 0 0 2 2 9 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 30 26 ;33
06:00 0 1 3 0 4 15 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 133
07:00 0 0 0 3 3 7 a 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 @34
08:00 0 0 1 2 3 3 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 21 36
09:00 0 0 1 0 4 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 131
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 18 32 34
11:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4 32 34
13 30 50 55 19 11 177
Day Totals 1 7 11
Totals 0 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 0 0 0 0 177
statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 21 m
Hedian Speed (50th percentile): 23 PE
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 M
85th Percentile 34 KPH
95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 KPH Pace 26-35 M
Nwiber of Vehicles in Pace 105
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59.99%
N@ of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MN: .001
2 '36ed @099126606, u'OJA weo-7:9 sing,
CITY OF TEECUL& CDUNTS UNLIMITED Site 152',C,@
COSKIC,IBET TWILIGET BORTH STAR 909-247.6716 3tart D@,t,: 03/21/96
7 DiY COUNT File @
.D. TECOSNB
D
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- th 85th
Ti:ie 5 10 35 40 Total
12:00 03/21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 29
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 ;34
04:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 29@ 39
05:00 0 0 0 2 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 29
06:00 0 0 0 0 5 16 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 271 @29
07:00 0 0 0 2 6 9 a 2 1 0 0 0 0 2a 231 134
08:00 0 0 1 2 5 18 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 @4 ju:
09,.OO 0 0 0 1 2 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 311 134
10:00 0 0 1 3 6 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 21 24 .33
11:00 0 0 1 2 6 14 3 1 0 0 a 0 0 27 26! 129
12:00 pi 0 0 0 3 A a 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 30 29@
01:00 0 0 0 2 5 10 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 28 291 33
02:00 0 0 0 1 1 6 la 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 ;34
03:00 0 0 0 1 12 14 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 28 133
04,00 0 0 0 1 6 12 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 37 291 133
05:00 0 0 0 2 4 11 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 44 311 34
06:00 0 0 0 1 7 11 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 23 J33
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 134
08:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 31@ '133
09:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 16 31@ 136
10:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 311 @37
11,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 32, @33
Day Totals 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 1 493 29;
Totals 0 0 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 0 0 1 499
Spged Statistics,
15th Percentile 22 MPH
Median (50th percentile): 29 MPH
Average @ - All Vehicles 29 MPH
85tb Percentile S@ 33 )H
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
of Vehicles in Pace 344
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 69.061
N@-r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
a6ed "09il-726606, -Oli eot7:g 966L 'LL itidy Aepsjnqi
C17Y IOF TDMULA COUNTS UNLIMITED Site @ode : 152503
MMIC/BET TWILIGEIT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 Start@Date: 03@22/96
File @.D.@: T@SNB
DiY COUNT
NORTI[BOUND
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
Tille 5 10 15 35 40 45 -50 55 60 999 T
12:00 03/22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 a 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a3:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
27 28 133
06:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 24 291 116
0 0 58 281 @33
08:00 0 0 2 1 6 23 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 31 281 33
09:00 0 0 0 2 8 8 11 2 0 0 0
10:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 31@ 34
II.:OO 0 0 0 4 5 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 38 291 134
12:00 pii 0 0 3 1 8 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 38 271 33
01:00 0 0 0 1 4 a 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 32
02:00 0 0 1 0 6 13 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 33
03:00 0 0 0 2 10 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 281 ;32
04:00 0 0 1 3 7 14 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 39 29 34
05:00 0 0 1 0 6 11 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 291 @34
06:00 0 0 1 1 6 14 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 36 34
07:00 0 0 1 4 1 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 10 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 34
4 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 31! 34
09:00 0 0 0 2 1 1
10:00 0 0 1 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 132
11:00 0 0 0 11 321 33
Day Totals 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 549 281
Totals 0 0 11 26 93 184 179 4@ 7 0 0 0 0 549
15th Percentile Speed 22 MP]i
Median Speed (5M percentile): 28 WU
.kverage Speed - AU Vehicles 29 XPH
$5th Percentile 33 WR
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
-35 MPH
10 KM Pace S@ : 26
Nuiber of vehicles in Pace : 363
Percent of vehicles in Pace : 66.00%
of Vehicles > 55 PH : 0
Percent of VeEcles > 55 MR: .001
'7O9ii'i26606, LUOJJ weo-,:g 966@ j v Alp'sllq,
COUNTS UNLIMITED Site (.ode 1: l@2508
CITY OF TWCULA
Start Date I : 031/23/96
@IC/Brr TWILIGHR & NORTIF STAR 909.247.6716 Fila- I.D.@-- 7@@COSI[B
7 DAY COUNT
Bqin n- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- $Oth 85th
Tise 5 10 15 20 25 '10 35 40 45 50 55 60 @99 Total @ct.
12:00 03/23 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 @29
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 371 139
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 34 :37
05:,)O 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 ;39
06:00 0 0 0 2 1 7 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 22 31@ @37
0 0 0 3 6 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 29 @33
07:00 271 :
08:00 0 0 0 3 4 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 27 132
09:00 0 0 0 2 12 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 211 33
10:00 0 0 3 4 a 18 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 27, 32
11:00 0 0 0 4 6 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 34
12:00 pii 0 0 0 4 17 13 15 1 0 a 0 0 0 50 26@
01:00 0 0 0 4 6 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 49 23 @33
02:00 0 0 1 4 8 20 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 271 32
03:00 0 0 2 12 3 8 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 231 32
04:00 0 0 a 6 12 20 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 59 271 132
46 261 129
05:00 0 0 0 10 9 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
06:00 0 0 1 7 9 11 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 36 25 !34
07:00 0 0 1 5 4 11 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 38 28 133
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 17 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 28, 33
09:00 0 a 2 1 3 3 a 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 30, 34
10:00 0 0 0 2 4 3 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 13 33
11:00 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 10 28 @34
Day Totals k 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 t 656 27
Totals 0 0 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 0 0 0 0 656
s@ statistics.
15th Percentile 20 MPH
Median @- (50th percentile): 27 HPH
Average Speed - All VehLicles 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 MR Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@er of Vehicles in Pace 398
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.58%
Nuitber of Vebicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vebicles > 55 PH: .001
P.-- 13 @j LI -L I W I -1
@ abed
@099-726606, ujojj wEC'i:g 966L 'LL 1L-,dv Ap@11,14
cm or TEMUU COUNTS UNLIMITED Site @ode : 15@8
COS)IIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start@Date: 03'/24/96
7 DAY COUNT File @.D.@: TTCOSNB
NORT@D
6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- oth 8@tb
10 25 2@ 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 lotal pct.
12:00 03/24 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 ;29
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32
02,00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 291 39
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 !34
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0
39
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ;
06:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26; @23
07:00 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ' 4 1 !32
08.00 0 0 0 1 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 :19
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 33
10:00 0 0 0 3 7 9 a 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 36
11:00 0 1 0 0 5 12 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 @32
12:DO pm 0 0 0 A 6 6 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 @33
01:00 0 0 0 3 2 16 16 6 0 0 1) 0 0 43 30 @34
1
02:00 0 0 1 1 5 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 271 133
44 231 !33
03'.00 0 0 0 4 7 15 15 3 0 G 0 0 0 1 i
04:00 0 0 1 0 12 13 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 47 29 @33
05:00 0 0 1 4 12 12 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 26, ;32
06:00 0 0 0 5 7 11 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 271 :33
07:00 0 0 0 5 7 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 29
08:00 0 0 0 1 6 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 25 281 34
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 271 32
10:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 33
0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1 _29! 34
Day Totals 1 472 27
1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3
Totals 0 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 0 0 0 0 472
15ti Percentile Speed
mediaii speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH
Average S@ - AU Vehicles 29 )M
85th Percentile S@ 33 RPH
95tlk Percentile Speed 36 MPH
io !TH Pace Sp---A- 26-35 VU
@r of Vehicles in Pace 307
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 64.901
Mu@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00t
3 -L I W I -1 t@ i-, kD -D
9 abed 1098'7Z6606, IUOJ@
lue0@:9 966L 'LL
dv A.Ps"14-
CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTS UI(LINITFD site ode : I:)2503
MSHIC/BET TWILIG]rr NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start I)ate: 03,/25/96
7 DAY COUNT File D.I: T4cosNB
KR page 1: I
&gin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @Kothl g@th
Ti*e 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Total pct. ct.
12:00 03/25 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 2 24 129
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29. 139
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
: 139
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 129
05.00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 27 137
06:00 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 8 9 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 36 30 134
08:00 0 0 1 1 9 19 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 50 28@ 133
09:00 0 0 1 0 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 32
10:00 0 0 0 1 2 9 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 20 2$; 136
U:00 0 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 28 132
12:00 pa 0 0 0 3 13 5 10 4 a 0 0 0 0 35 2?@ 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 271 134
02:00 0 0 0 0 7 a 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 281 136
03:00 0 0 0 0 5 19 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 291 133
04:00 0 0 2 2 2 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 28! 33
05:00 0 0 0 3 8 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 26@ 31
14 28 33
06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 36
08:00 0 0 0 0 6 6 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 24 29@@ 34
09:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 241 139
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 !34
11:00 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Day Totals 4 12 8" 151 120 39 2 415 28@@
Totals 0 0 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 0 0 0 0 410
Speed Statistics,
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
?fedian Speed (50th percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPff
85th Percentile speed 33 .4PH
95th Percentile 37 MPH
10 @ Pace Speed 26-35 KPH
N@ of Vehicles in Pace : 271
Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 65.141
N@r of Vehicles > 55 RH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 I(PH: DO%
ci@-L i w r -imn s-LNnoo
/ abed -- @099726606, UJOJJ
uJeO@:V 966L 'L
It /1,P@lllq
I
CITY DF TEMULA COG)(TS C)FLIMITED site @ode! @2508
COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH S?.kR 909.247.6716 Start t.,;: 013'/26196
7 DAY ODLTNT File D.'. ICOSNB
Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- Oth! 8 th
Tige 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total ct.! Pct.
12.-OO 03/26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 291 1;34
04:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22@ 24
05:00 0 0 1 0 2 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29' 33
06:00 0 0 0 0 6 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 26. 32
07,00 0 0 2 1 3 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 281 33
08:00 0 0 0 2 5 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 34 28 33
09:00 0 0 0 4 2 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 281 133
10:00
0 0 0 1 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 @33
11:00 0 1 0 0 6 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 23 281 !34
12:00 pi 0 0 1 2 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 27! 113
01:00 0 0 1 0 5 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33
02:00 0 0 3 4 a 16 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 47 27. 134
03:00 0 0 0 4 2 19 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 23 133
04:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 23 31@ @37
8 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26
05:00 0 0 1 3 7 6
06:00 0 1 0 1 a 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 27@ ;13
07:00 0 0 0 0 4 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 129
08:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 133
09:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 31! 37
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27. 29
ll,,OO 0 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19@ 129
Day Totals 2 9 24 go 145 119 30 3 2 414 25:;
Totals 0 2 9 24 go 145 119 30 3 2 0 0 0 414
Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 21 xn
m6an @ (50th percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - ill VebLicles 28 PR
95th Percentile 33 MPH
95th Percentile @ed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 )M
@r of Vehicles in Pace 264
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 63.611
of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH., .001
a6ed 10913-726606, -OJA w-0-1:2 966t 't
CITY OF TEMECULL COUNTS U)(LIMTF.D Site 0 15@a
CMECIBET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Starl Date. 0'3/27/@6
7 DkY COU]rr File I.D.1 TE6WB
NORTHBOUND Paw_ 11
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50 95th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct@ P,Ct.
12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 k 29
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
05-00 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 34
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 33
07:00 0 0 0 3 4 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 27, 33
08:00 0 0 2 1 10 18 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 47 2? 33
0 12 27 36
09:00 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 10 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 36
11:00 0 0 1 2 3 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 27 32
12.00 pi 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 29 33
OL:DO 0 0 0 1 4 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 21 28 34
02.00 0 0 3 1 8 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 33 21, 33
03.00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 23
Totals 0 1 6 10 49 109 80 24 3 0 0 0 0 281
Speed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Redian Speed (50th percentile): 2a MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 M
95th Percentile Si>eed 33 WH
95th Percutile S@ 37 HPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vebicles in Pace 189
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.02t
Nuiiber of Vehicles > 55 NM 0
Percent of '@ehicles 55 MPH: .001
aD-L,wi7Nn s-LNnoo
6 ared -- 709SIZ6606, WOJJ weol:g 966L ILL lljdv Aepsin4-
CITY or i@u COUNTS UNLIKITED @ite C@ : 152502
@smiCliET TWILIRHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 @tar@ Date: 03/20)196
7 DAY SPRED SUR7E7i File I.D.1 TECO@-BPI
SOUT.QBOUND a - I
0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 5ct4 95th
Tite 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Totil Pct.. Pct.
12:00 03 20
01:00
02:00 k k
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00 t
07:00
03:00
09:00 t
10:00
12:00 p-k'
oi:oo !
02:00 t
03:00
04:00 0 0 0 3 14 21 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 26' 32
05:00 0 0 0 5 13 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 33
06:00 0 1 0 5 8 19 is 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 21 33
07:00 1 0 1 0 1 2 10 & 3 0 0 0 0 1 9 21 34
08:00 0 0 1 5 7 12 & 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 33
09:00 0 0 0 2 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29
10:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 2i 37
II.-OO 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 34
Day Totals 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 1 2 2 2
Totals 0 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 0 0 0 1 2 2
Statistics,
15th Percentile Speed 21 UK
Median percentile): 27 KPH
Average All Vehicles 28 KPB
85th Percentile Speed 33 PYH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@ of Vehicles in Pace 152
Percent of vehicles !it Pace 60.281
@r of Vehicles > 55 M 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
a3llWl-lNn sinnoo
2 a6ed -- 1099'7Z6606, wojj wezo:LL 966L L l@jdv /,epsinq-
CITY OF'TEK@ 5 UNLIMITED te Code : 152532
@C/@ET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 art Date: 03/21/96
7 D&Y SPEED SURV[71
i SOUTHBOUND
KN in 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 50tji 8 5 t)
61-
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@l @t Dct.
12.00 Oj]21 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
ol-oo I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2q 34
06:00 0 0 0 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 23 33
33
07:00 1 0 0 1 0 7 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 27
08:00 0 0 0 0 5 26 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 13
09:00 0 0 0 3 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 32
10:00 0 0 1 0 2 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33
11:00 0 0 1 4 4 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 32
12:00 0 0 1 1 5 13 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 34
oi:oo 0 0 1 5 2 13 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 @3 27 34
02:00 0 0 1 1 10 13 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 @9 27 3
4 28 33
03:00 0 0 0 3 4 23 23 1 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 2 4 22 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 @7 21 34
D5:DO 0 0 0 1 11 22 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 28 33
0 0 0 0 2 a 25 16 4 0
6:00 . 0 0 0 0 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 33
08:00 0 0 1 2 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 32
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 31
U:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 29
Day To s 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 5@2 2
Totals 0 0 7 28 ag 243 190 35 1 0 0 a 0 52
S@tistics.
15th Percentile S@ 22 MPH
Median S@ (50th percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
35th Percentile Speed 33 MM
95th Percentile 36 RH
-35 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26
of Vehicles in Pace 433
f Vehicles in Pace 73.02%
Percent o
X@r of Vehicles > 55 MP[[ 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
cr3-L i w i -iNn s-L"no3
@6ed -- '70913@26606, -0@4
-e2O:LL 966L L ILdv A.P@1,4i
CITY OF TEMECULA COCKS UNLIMITEU Site Code@: l@2502
@IC/BET -TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start:Date: 03/22/96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. T!rllosBpl
41- 46- 51- 56- 35th
45 50
12:00 03 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 32
Ol-.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @l 24
03,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 34
05.00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 241 29
06:00 0 0 0 0 4 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 @7 27 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 6 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 Zi 281 33
oa:oo 0 0 0 0 9 20 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 @7 2 '@. 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 a 0 0 0 0 231 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 32
11:00 0 0 0 0 5 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 291 33
12:00 pit 0 0 0 2 11 12 10 0 0 0 0 1) 1 316 27: 32
01:00 0 0 0 4 3 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33
02:00 0 0 0 3 a 19 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 33
03:00 0 0 0 4 9 27 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 32
0 0 0 4 27; 32
04-,OO 0 0 1 2 9 20 11 1 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 1 5 25 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 34
06:00 0 0 0 3 12 26 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 @6 281 33
07,00 0 0 0 3 6 15 12 2 0 0 0 0 2@ 33
08:00 0 0 1 4 3 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 27 32
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 10 a 0 0 G 0 0 27 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 10 4 0 0 G 0 0 27 31
ii-oo 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 26
Day Totals 1 2 30 112 218 176 32 1 1 6( 2 2@
Totals 0 0 2 30 112 248 176 32 1 0 0 0 1 6( 2
St tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 KPH
Median (50th percentile): 28 MPII
Average Speed - )dl Vehicles 28 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed : 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 KPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace : 424
Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 70.41%
N@ of Vehicles > 55 RPS 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
C[3-LIWI-INn SINNOO
'7 a6ed -- @099@Z6606, UIOJJ Lue2o:@L 966L LL I[jdv Aepsinu
CITY OF TD=U COOTS UNLIMITED 02
CMAIC/BET TWILIGHT NONH STAR 909.247.6716 3/@6
7 DAY SPEED SURIEY SBPI
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 25- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
5 10 15 25 3 5 60 9 " T@
12: N 03/23 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 241 32
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 34
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 34
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@@ 32
2 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 6 29 37
07:00 0 0 0 2 3 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 28 33
08,00 0 0 0 3 7 10 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 20 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 a 2q 33
10:00 0 0 0 2 3 11 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 @4 24 @3
11:00 0 0 1 1 2 18 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 11 2g 33
12:00 pd I 0 0 0 1 6 14 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 @5 28 33
01:00 I 0 0 1 4 6 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 32
02:00 0 0 0 2 6 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 32
03:00 0 0 1 2 8 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33
04:00 0 0 0 1 13 20 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 27 32
05:00 0 0 0 1 11 16 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 @3 20 @3
06:00 0 0 0 2 8 19 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 8 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 @7 21 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 6 12 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33
og:oo 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 5 a 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 36
io:oo 0 0 0 1 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 33
ii*oo 0 0 0 0 2 4 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 3 34
Day Tota Is 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 6 6 2@
Totals 0 0 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 0 0 0 0 6 6
@tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPff
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 KPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 HPII
85th Flexcentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@r of Vehicles in Pace 427
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 69.21%
ff@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: Oot
a2i-L iw i -i"n s-LNnoo
abed 99'7Z6606, WOJA
LUUZD:LL 966L ,L I L@dV Ap5;,nqi
CITY OF TENECUU COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite'C@ : t52502
COSMIC/B.LIT TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 @tar@ Date: 03/24/96
7 DAY SNED SURVEY @ile @I.D.1 : TEMSBPI
i SOBTRBIYJND
0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- a5th
Tie 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totil Pct.' Pf-t.
12:00 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 28
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 34
2 29 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
24
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
U4;VU 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 29 34
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 34
06:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 37
07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33
08:00 0 0 0 2 8 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @3 26 32
09:00 0 0 0 1 5 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @g 27 32
IO:W 0 0 0 2 4 16 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 @1 28 32
11:00 0 0 1 4 8 16 a 1 1 a 0 0 0 9 27 32
12:00 olk@ 0 0 0 1 7 20 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 23 32
01:00 0 0 0 5 9 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 @7 26 32
02:00 0 0 0 1 10 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 @0 26 32
03:00 0 0 0 0 9 24 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 32
04.00 0 0 0 3 5 20 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 @1 21 32
05:00 0 0 0 3 8 15 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 @0 27 33
06:00 0 0 0 1 6 19 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 )0 21 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 Li 23 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33
2 2
08:00 0 0 0 2 7 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 34
11:00 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: 33
Day Tota ; -Is 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 5 @8 27
Totals 0 0 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 0 0 0 0 5
15th Percentile 22 MM
@an Speed (5= percentile): 27 9H
Average All Vehicles 28 MM
85th Percentile Speed 33 HPII
95th Percentile Speed 35 KM
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@r of Vehicles in Pace 405
Percent of Vekicles in Pace 68.76t
of Vebicles ) 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 XPH: .001
@098 t, z: 6 6136 (13-LIWI-INn S-LNno:D
@9 a6ed -- lO9g'7Z6606, UIOJA ujezo:LL 966L
cirl OF:TENECOU COOHN U?(LINITED Site Code : 152502
@IC/@Er TWILIGHT NMTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start Date: , 03/25/96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY @ile@I.D RECOSBPI
SMTHBOUND
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56 50th 85th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6 Pct pct.
11:00 01/25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 !l 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !I 29
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 34
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 29
06:00 0 0 0 3 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 '6 23 29
07:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33
08:00 0 0 0 0 8 22 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 48 28 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 7 13 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 32
U:00 0 0 1 1 11 10 9 A 0 0 0 0 0 21 33
12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 4 21 11 1 0 0 0 0 28 33
01:00 0 0 0 2 10 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 25 33
02:f)O 0 0 0 3 10 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 '17 28 33
03:00 0 0 1 1 a 23 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 @4 23 33
04:00 0 0 2 1 6 26 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 @8 21 32
05:00 0 0 0 1 9 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 @9 21 33
D6:00 0 0 0 1 12 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 @l 2@ 33
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 @67 3q 36
08:00 0 0 0 1 6 8 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 37
09.00 0 0 0 1 4 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 34
io.oo 0 0 0 2 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2! 32
II-.00 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 @Q 3: 34
Day Totals 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 579 2@
Totals 0 0 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 0 0 0 0 5@8
s@ s@tistics.
15th Percentile S@ 22 MM
Kedian Speed (50th perceiitile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 KPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 KPH
95th Percentile 37 MPH
10 UH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vebicles in Pace 397
Percent of vehicles in Pace 66.841
of Vebicies > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 4F!I: .00@
(i3-L i w i -it-4n si-Nnoo
L ased -- 1099IZ6606, u'OJA
weZO:LL 966L 'LL 1,,dV Apsn4
ite Codd : 152502
CITY OF.: U CLDUHM MIMITED
@IC/@Lr TWILIGGT MC)RTB STAR 909-247.6716 Start Date: 03/26/96
7 DAY SPEED SUR;EY File'l.D@ T-ICOSBPI
16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 5 Ktb 65th
Time 5 to 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 60 999
12:00 03/26 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 34
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 33
05:00 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 21 34
06:00 0 0 0 2 2 11 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 ?2 28 34
07:00 0 0 1 2 5 9 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 @6 27 34
32
09:00 0 1 1 1 10 30 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 61 2@
09:00 0 1 0 1 8 a 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 33
LI:00 0 0 0 0 8 12 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 33
12,00 p@ 0 1 0 3 9 14 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @4 -,3 33
01.00 0 0 3 2 6 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 @9 26 32
02:00 1 0 0 4 11 20 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 51 21 33
03:00 0 0 0 0 13 30 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 @2 2J 33
04:00 0 0 1 4 1 19 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 45 21 33
05-.OO 0 0 1 2 10 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 @0 2@ 32
06.,OO 0 0 0 3 12 29 18 4 0 0 0 0 a @6 2 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 5 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 33
0 0 0 2 23 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 a 11 10 2 0 0
4 13
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 12 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
10.,OO 0 0 0 0 4 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 33
11:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 34
Day Totals 1 3 8 28 128 292 215 42 2 1
79 2@
Totals 1 3 8 28 129 282 215 42 2 0 0 0 0 719
s@tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 PR
14edian Speed (50th percentile), 28 RH
Aver@ Speed - All Vebicles 29 MM
95th Percentile Speed 33 KM
95th Percentile Speed 36 PH
-35 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26
Nw&r of VebLicles in Pace 497
Percent of VeEcles in Pace 70.02t
Nuiber of VeUcles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of VaUcles > 55 MPH: .00%
(i 3 i i w i -1 N n s j- N n o o
19 a8ed -- @09SIZ6606, @0-IJ
Ule2O:LL 966L
CITY Of TEK@ COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite c@ : I '52502
@ic/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 03/27/%
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSBPL
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- :50th 35th
ii3c 5 10 15 0 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@l :Pct" ..Pct.
12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 !2 3@ 139
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 @2 3@ 34
.0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 21 34
06:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 '1 23 33
07:00 0 1 0 4 8 13 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 27 33
08:00 0 0 0 2 9 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 48 27 32
09:00 0 0 0 0 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 23 31'
10-00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 27 33
11:00 0 0 1 1 5 15 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 44 24 33
12:00 po 0 0 1 3 4 16 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 @3 27 3
01:00 0 1 0 3 1 4 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 @6 30 33
02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 a 0 0 0 @3 21 32
03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 33
Totals 0 2 3 17 61 132 113 20 1 0 0 0 0 3@4
SRged @t@ics,
15tb Percentile Speed 22
Xedian Speed (@ percentile): 28 KPII
kverage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
35th Percentile Speed 33 XPH
95th Percentile 36 KPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vebicles in Pace 250
Percent of V@cles in Pace 70.421
N@-r of Vehicles > 55 RH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 HIIH: .00%
CE3-LlWl-lF4n S-LNNOO
@6 a6ed -- 10981?6606, IUOJJ @CZO:LL 966L 'LL I ,dV Aeps-,n,4
CITY OF TEMECULA
COSMIC DRIVE SOUTH OF NORTH STAR
SPEED SURVEY DATA
NORTHBOUND
MARCH 27 - APRIL 3, 1996
,.c: @n ,,,Grero le,,
@uutii6 ONLimilLi) Site Coce : ' -
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Star' Date: 03@'2',, 96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMNB
unp@nu IDAM. I
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 3 6- 41- 46- 5'- - 56- 6!- 50th 35th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 03/27
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 pm
01:00
02:00 0 0 3 1 a 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 38 2 33
03:00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 28 33
04:00 0 0 0 2 6 13 14 3 0 1 0 0 0 39 29 33
05:00 0 0 0 3 14 14 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 49 27 33
06:00 0 0 2 2 8 16 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 39 27 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 3 8 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 21 2'0 38
09:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 32 38
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 29 49
11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 39
Day Totals 5 11 52 96 81 21 5 2 273 28
- - - -- i-@.@.. @iz@ @oce : - D
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03,271;96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMIIB
Mf)DT@rTu 1).,. 2
Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 35th
Time 20 25 30 35 40 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 031128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
05:00 0 0 1 1 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 38
06:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 29 33
07:00 0 0 1 0 5 6 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 2-, 31 33
08:00 0 0 0 0 9 19 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 28 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 8 4 3 1 0 1) 0 0 21 15 36
10:00 0 0 0 2 4 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1-, 27 33
11:00 0 0 0 1 7 13 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 32 27 33
1-2:00 pm 0 0 0 1 4 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 2- 3'@ @3
01:00 0 0 0 0 10
1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 30 23 '@7
02:00 0 0 1 2 4 17 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 40 18 34
03:00 0 1 0 2 7 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 43 28 33
04:00 0 0 1 1 12 12 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 38 21-' 32
05:00 0 0 0 2 7 7 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 13
06:00 0 0 0 1 4 15 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 30 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 33
08:00 0 0 1 0 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 3-'
09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 24 29
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 32 34
11:00 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 32 34
Day Totais 1 5@ 16 87 160 158 48 4 479 28
-Z,- i -, -1,@ @ I @@ulti@ LNL.Iii 'ED Sit2 C@(:e : 'I-,.@Dtio
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03/i27i96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TEC'@-)SHNB
NORTHBOUND/DOWNHILL Pace
Beqin 0- 6- 11- 16- @1- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
- 50t.'@ 35th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 03/29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 29 32
06:00 0 0 0 0 3 9 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 23 29 36
07:00 0 0 1 1 2 6 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 30 34
08:00 0 0 1 1 7 25 20 3 1 0 0 0 0 58 28 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 26 28 37
10:00 0 0 0 1 0 a 6 2 0 0 0 0 1) 17 28 33
11:00 0 0 0 2 3 12 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 32 29 33
l@1:00 Po el 0 0 2 3 9 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 27 ?g 3E
ol.:Oo 0 0 2 1 5 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 27 28
02:00 0 0 2 1 8 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 28 @'2
03:00 0 0 1 1 7 18 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 46 28 33
04:00 0 0 0 2 5 10 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 32 29 33
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 10 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 33 31 14
06:00 0 0 0 4 3 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 2 11 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 36
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 2- 34
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 4 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 18 31 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 6 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 24 33
.11:00 0 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 33
Day Totals 7 24 68 184 176 43 4 2 508 28
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03 Q6
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File TECI@E14113
NORTHBOUND/DOW'NHILL p3ce
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26 - 31- 3 6- 41- 46 - 1 - 56- 6'L -
35c,
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 03/130 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 13
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 39
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 '@4
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 29 34
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2- 49
05:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
06:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 9 4 0 0 1) 0 0 31 36
07:00 0 0 1 2 5 6 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 28 33
08:00 0 0 1 0 8 18 8 2 0 0 0 0 1-7
1, 3,'
09:00 0 0 0 0 4 15 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 33 29 34
10:00 0 1 0 4 12 13 8 5 0 0 0 0 4-1, 34
11:00 0 0 1 2 9 25 10 3 0 0 0 0 ro
32
12:00 pm 0 0 0 0 8 21 9 1 0 r, 0 3@
01:00 0 0 0 1 5 6 13 1 1 (0 0 0
02:00 0 0 1 3 6 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 @12 27 3@1
03:00 0 0 1 3 4 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 fl, 25 27 31
04:00 0 1 1 1 2 13 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 2-1 3@
05:00 0 0 0 3 13 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 21
06:00 0 0 0 1 11 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 26 33
07:00 0 0 0 2 2 7 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 20 28 3,-
08:00 0 0 0 3 0 3 a 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 30 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 1) 0 0 0 11 2- 31
11:00 0 0 1 1 4 2 1 1 0 1) 0 0 10 23 39
Day Totals 2 6 28 100 192 137 35 4 504 27
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 03;12-,,96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TEC,@s,'IqIB
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- -1- 50t.@ 35@h
0-
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. P't.
12:00 03@131 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
05:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 27
06:00 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2-@, 29 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 5 12 9 3 0 0 0 0 29 28 34
10:00 0 0 0 5 9 14 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 26 29
0 0 0 2 3 9 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 29 33
12:00 pm 0 0 2 2 7 1'@ 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2@' @13
OI:CO 0 0 1 3 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 24 32
02:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 27 32
03:00 0 0 0 2 1 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 29 33
04:00 0 0 0 1 2 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 33
05:00 0 0 0 0 7 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 2- 32
06:00 0 0 0 1 8 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 31
09:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 33
IO:CO 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33
0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 3,'
Day Totals 3 22 76 134 100 16 1 352 27
SECOND LOCATION 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: )3/@@-l-,,'96
DAY SPEED SURVEY P4@!-A- I.D. "ECOSMNB
Bqin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th
TiMe 5 @0 15 20 25 30 35 40 55 60 ?99 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 041/01 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 28
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 29
05:00 0 1 0 0 2 6 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 28 33
06:00 0 0 0 1 2 8 6 1 0 0 0 0 .9 28 1@3
Oi-:00 0 0 0 1 2 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 23 ig '2
08:00 0 0 0 2 5 16 11.2 2 0 0 0 0 0 '-)5 33
09:00 0 0 2 2 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 25 76 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 4 11 9 0 0 0 0 11 24
11:00 0 0 0 2 5 5 4 1 0 0 0 c
12:00 pm 0 0 3 3 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 -'5 3
01:00 0 0 0 2 9 16 8 1 0 0 0 c@ 0 36 3-1
f,'2:00 0 1 0 0 6 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33
03:CO 0 0 0 2 4 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 21-' 28
04:00 0 0 0 1 15 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 28 34
05:00 0 0 0 0 11 23 7 5 1 0 0 0 1) 4-@ 2- 33
06:00 0 0 1 1 12 10 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 26 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 0 7 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 34
08:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 28 34
09:00 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 28
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
11:@,O 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2;' 32
Day Totals 2 3 20 88 191 131 26 5 1 467 28
SECOI(D LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Dat-2: 03,@2;7196
DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSHNB
ILL page
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pcl@.
12:00 04/02 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 3'
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 34
05:00 0 1 0 1 2 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 33
06:00 0 0 2 1 7 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 26 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 6 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 22 417 33
08:00 0 0 0 4 7 19 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 4-; 28 32
09:00 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 fD 16 33
2-
10:00 0 0 0 3 11 1-3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 36 26 32
il@:00 0 0 0 0 2 8 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 18 15 36
l@1:00 PM 0 0 2 2 11 11 2 0 0 0 0 28 ?C, 313
01:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 26 30 34
02:00 0 0 4 0 3 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 21-, 32
03:00 0 0 0 0 5 8 a 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 34
04:00 0 0 0 0 a 16 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 40 28 34
05:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33
06:00 0 0 0 0 2 13 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 30 29 36
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 28 33
08:00 0 0 0 3 3 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 27 34
09:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 29 39
,.O:oo 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 29
11:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 31 34
Day Totals 1 7 18 76 167 124 44 438 28
Site @oce
SECOND LOCATION @ 42176 COSMIC 909.247.6716 Start Date: 031,'27,'96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY File I.D. TECOSMNB
NORTHBOUND/@ILL 3
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 85th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 04/03 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 29
04:00 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 34
05:00 0 1 0 0 2 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 34
06:00 0 0 0 3 4 9 '17 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 33
07:00 0 0 1 2 3 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 2' 32
08:00 0 0 0 2 8 15 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 41- 29 33
09:00 0 2 0 6 11 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 33
10:00 0 0 0 1 4 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 28 33
11:00 0 0 1 1 5 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 33
12:00 pm 0 0 0 1 8 11 9 4 1 0 (1 0 0 34 23 34
01:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 28 33
02:00 0 0 1 1 3 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 2@- 33
Totals 0 9 41 151 594 1215 994 253 25 6 0 0 0 3288
Speed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th Dercentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 2209
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.16%
Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
CITY OF TEMECULA
COS;VIIC DRIVE / SOUTH OF NORTH ST'F,
SPEED SURVEY DATA
SOUTHBOUND
MARCH 27 - APRIL 3,1996
2ED LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909.247.6716 Star' Date: 03 @6
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY
File I.D. TECCSIISB
SOUTHBOUNDIUPHILL ge I
@iri 0- 6- 17@- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61@- 50th 85th
Tine 5 10 15 20 25 45 50 9 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 03/27
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 pm
01:00
02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 2n
03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 53 28 @3
04:00 0 0 0 2 5 27 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 29 33
05:00 0 0 1 4 9 33 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 -;1 28 33
06:00 0 1 0 3 8 21 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 58 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 4 7 11 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33
08:00 1 0 0 0 4 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 .15 27 31
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 29 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 31 33
ll:no 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 33
Da,.i '@otais 1 1 2 17 58 157 133 20 389 28
2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909-247.6716 Star* ;a-@@:' 96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY i,- -
:--- -.D. :
SOUTBOOD/UPHILL
Begi,i 0- 6- 11- 16- 2 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51-- 56- 6:-- 0 t @5t.@
Time 10 15 2@10 25 30 35 4 55 60 999 Tota.1 ?ct. DC-
03/28 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1) 3 32 j4
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1) 0 2 29 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 39
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 1) 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 (11 0 0 C) 1) 2 29 4
05:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 -
1 L 1 0 0 0 0 28 4
06:00 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 2 0 13 @17 1,3
07:00 0 0 0 8 12 12 1 10 0 0 c
08:00 0 0 0 5 11 29 15 1 0 0
4 6 3 0 0 0 0 0
:,JO 0 0 2 10 100 0
'4
12:00 r, 0 0 2 10 1-7 9 0
@1:00 0 0 0 2 1- 13
14 2 0
o2:,JO 0 0 1 1 11 22 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 44
03:00 0 0 1 0 13 24 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 @o 25 31
,)4:00 0 10 0 14 21, 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 53
,)5:00 c 0 1 3 26 19 1 0 0 0 0 1@ @3 23
06:00 0 0 0 2 10 23 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 ;:o 27 @3'
07:00 0 0 0 1 - 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 @6 28 -')3
08:00 0 0 1 0 4 10 11 4 0 0 0 10
1 34
09:00 0 0 1 2 14 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 31 23 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 l@ 28 34
0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 31 @13
Day Totals 1 7 22 131 281 189 36 4 6-1 27
211D '@OCATION IN FRONT OF 421-76) 909-247.6716 St3r: D3:e: 01 7-7 '-6
7 DkY SPEED SURVEY :,;ie -.D. TECCS2sB
Pace
@in 0- 6- 16- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
Time 10 35 4
12:00 03/4-9 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1) 0
1)3:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 7@
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 10 0
05:00 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 0 0 0 28 3-'
06:00 0 0 0 1 3 14 3 0 0 0 18 -g 3'@
07:00 0 0 1) 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1) 0 3
1)8:00 0 0 0 4 11 26 11- 3 0 0 1) 0 0 -'3
09:00 0 0 0 0 2 8 9 0 0 0 0 1? 79 @3
3 0 '4
10 10 4 0 4
12: f)O Dm 0 0 5 21 20 2 0 0 0 49
9 2
0 0
0 1 2 10 22 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 4@A
)5:00 0 0 0 1 6 24 15 6 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 0 0 3 11 25 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 66 23
07:00 0 0 0 2 13 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 35 28 '@,3
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 7
09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0
Day Totais 3 22 107 231 190 36 2 591 28
2!ID cv0@['P OF 1?1-@
DAY SPEED SURVEY
26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 01-
io '-5 55 60 999 Tozal Pct. Pct.
lz':OO C3i3O 0 1 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O',,:OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1)
011:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 1)
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01-:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
09:00 0 0 0
10:00 0 0 1)
12:00 Po 0 13 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
01: 0 0 tD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C',:)O 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)4:00 0
0 2 3 8 0 0 0 0 @6 2
iD5:00 0 0 2 10 14 12 0 1 0 0 0 c 39 2-' 3-
06:00 0 0 0 2 9 18 13 1 0 0 0 0 fi 43 2' @1'
07:00 0 0 0 1 6 14 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 2"0
0 8 :,I- 0 0 0 0 7 1 6 3 0 0 2- 7 3
09:00 0 0 0 1 5 7 6 1 0 0 0 2'9 31 38
10:00 0 0 0 1 4 1@ 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 28 32
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 31
Day Totais 10 46 90 76 13 2 1 238 28
2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 42176) 909.247.61-,16 StarL Date: 03 7@-, 96
7 DAY SPEED SURI@'EY J.D. T(C@@"@B
SOUTHBOUND/UPffILL
Beqin 0- 6- !1- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- qoth 35-@1'@
T@ime 5 10 15 20 :5 '10 @15 40 45 50 -5 60 ?99 Tot3,, p@,. PC+.
12:00 03,@31 0 11 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
01:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24 29
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 34
03:00 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:'JO 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 2- 29
05:00 0 0 1) 1 0 0 0 11 2- 19
f,'6 :,JO 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 7 19 ',4
O-/:Oo ci 0 2 0 4 4 4 0 0 15
08:C,O 0 - 6 6 0 0 0 0 22 -6
0 4 6 0 @3
2
5 1 7 32
2 7 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
3
,--:)O 0 11) 2 6 -1,3 '4
1,10 0 21 9 11 3 5'
C)2:00 0 0 0 1 3 I.,L 5 1 0 1 0 0 2-
03:00 0 0 0 0 10 21 9 10 9 0 1) 0 0 40 @17 3'-
,,:I - 41
1 11 11 1 4 1;1 14 u 11 1) J) t@ - 20 -1
05:00 0 0 0 4 3 17 11 1 0 0 0 41 27 12
06:00 0 0 0 2 5 21 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 2; @12
07:00 0 0 0 1 10 22 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 52 '118 33
08:00 0 0 0 1 5 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 24 2@ 32
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 11 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 29 29 36
10:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 16 27 33
11:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 24 32
Day Totais 26 24 1.05 249 143 18 3 1 569 27
2ND LOCKTION IN FRONT OF 42 17 6) 909.247.6716 Star+ Date: 1)3.21 96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY L7i@e '4.D. -ECJS-SB
SOUTBOUND/UPHILL D40. 6
Begin 0- 6- !1- 16- 21- 26- 3!- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- -ot., 35th
Tii3e 5 10 60 999 :'ct. Pct.
15 20 25 30 3r, 40 45 50 55
1 . 2:00 04/01 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 j3
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 @9 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1) 0 1)
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 (0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 34 44
05:00 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 f) 0 9 23 33
06:00 0 1) 0 @j 3 3 1 0 1) 0 9 -8 34
07:00 0 1) 0 2 3 5 2 0 0
08:00 0 0 PI 3 6 13 9 3 0 01 0 '4 77 @3
09:00 0 0 0 6 8 9 1 0 0 0
10: 0 0 2 70 5
4- 79
ll:,JO 0 0 1 1 4 17 1-17 2 0 0 0 0
ol@ DM f) 0 0 13 10 2 0 0
;)I : 00 11 0 1 4 20 12 3 0 0 @6
!)2:00 0 0 0 2 5 22 9 0 0 0 1 0 1) 38
03:00 0 0 1 2 7 16 13 4 0 0 0 0 (0 43 23
04 :01) 0 0 12 19 14 0 0 1) 0 116
05:00 0 0 0 1 13 18 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 41- 2-17 32
lD6:00 0 0 1 2 13 26 14 1 0 0 0 0 5-/ 27 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 6 17 12 0 0 0 0 0 116 28 1@2
08:00 0 0 0 2 9 13 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 46 28 33
09:00 0 0 0 3 5 8 0 0 0 0 '4 32
10:00 0 0 0 1 2 6 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1-2 3'
11:00 0 0 2 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 12 24 29
Day Totais 6 32 114 253 178 28 2 613 27
2ND LOCATION III FRONT OF 42'@1-6) 909.247.6716 Star, Date:
DAY SPEED SURVEY '.D.
SOUTHBOL'ND/UPHILL Page
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- ,11- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 5oti
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 rIo 55 60 999 Tot3l Pcl. Pc:.
12:00 04,@02 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 39
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 34
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04:00 0 0 0 1) 1 4 0 0 0 1) t) 0 0 5 26 23
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 2- 32
06:00 0 0 4 3 2 0 0 1 23 32
07:00 0 0 0 1 4 !6 5 3 1 0 0 pi '0 20 34
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 18 12 2 0 0 0 3-1 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2- -')2
10:00 0 0 0 5 13 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 @-@3
li@:00 0 0 0 6 14 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2@ 3-
12:00 pm 0 0 1 1 5 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 31, 2'@
01:00 0 0 0 1 4 9 13 0 0 0 ig 2@@ 33
02:,,'C 0 0 1 2 12 17 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 45
03:00 0 0 0 0 6 21 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 46 28 33
04:00 0 0 3 1 11 14 18 5 1 1 0 0 0 54 28 34
05:00 0 0 1 2 13 22 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 @5 2-1 12
06:00 0 0 0 0 3 22 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 41 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 5 22 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 44 28
08:00 0 0 0 1 8 10 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 35 29
09:00 0 0 0 3 2 11 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 23 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 1 6 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 14 29 33
11:00 0 0 Ci 0 2 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 29 33
Day Totals 5 22 104 252 180 36 7 3 610 28
2ND LOCATION IN FRONT OF 4211-,6) 909.247.6716 Star, Date: 03 2- Q6
7 DAY SPEED SUR117EY TECCS-SB
SOU'THBOUND/UPHILL page 3
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th 35tt
Time 5 10 15 30 15 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 04/03 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 31 34
01:00 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 19 29
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 34
04:00 0 1) 0 2 2 0 f) 0 0 0 0 6 2 32
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29 33
06:00 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 1) 0 13 @'3 -'6
07:00 0 0 0 2 2 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 23 .9 36
lm:,Jo (3 1) 5 9 12 6 2 0 0 0 1) 0 35 26 3
09:00 0 0 2 9 9 1 0 0 0 23 3
10:00 0 0 0 1 6 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 32
11:00 0 0 3 7 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 '3
11:00 PM 0 0 1 2 4 14 9 5 1) 0 0 0 0 35 2o 34
Ol:,@O 0 0 0 2 9 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 29 26 32
02:00 0 0 0 1 4 16 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 36 28 33
Totals 1 2 53 1-1 724 1616 1@169 208 21 5 0 0 0 391-0
Speed Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 .4PH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 2785
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.14%
Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00$
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENA STREET / WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE
24 HOUR SPEED SURVEY
EASTBOUND/REPLACEMENT COUNT
APRIL 1996
'IC' yn I/c
-@ERIFIC.kTITON SPEED SURVEY COUIIT 909.247.61-16 Start Da@: 04e 103,9,
6 PM WED/6 PM THUR Fiie I.D. : TE!CEBS2
EKSTBOCND
Begin 0- 6- @l- i6- 21- 26- 3i- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50'Ll 85th
Tize 5 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. Pct.
12:00 04@@03
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
O:,)O
12:cjO i) ri
01:00
C2:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00 0 1 2 1 3 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 111) 2;- 73
0: ','O 0 0 1 4 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 26 33
08:00 2 0 0 1 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 29 36
09:00 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 34
10:00 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 24
11:00 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0
Day Totais 2 2 2 4 11 14 13 7 55 27
"'ERIFICATION SPEED SUR'@EY COUNT
6 PM WED/6 PM THUR
Beain 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26-
Time
@:00 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 1 0 0 0 0
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:00
0 0 1) 0 2 5
@,'3 : ()O 0 1 0 4
09:00 0 0 1 1 0 1
10:i)O 0 1 0 1 3
0 1
12:00 pm 0 0 2 0 2 2
0 0 0 2
02:00 0 0 0 1 1 5
03:00 0 1 1 1 3 6
04:00 0 1 0 6 8
05:00 0 1 1 3 7 a
@otals 2 6 11 11 37 65
Soeed St3tist'cs.
15th Percentile Speed 19 14PE
Median Speed (50th percentile): 27 qPH
Average SDeed - kil 'vehicles 27 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Sp@- 26-35 MPH
Number of Vehicles in Pace 117
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 58.02%
N@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
--9@@9.2'4@ start @ate: 04;ioll;96
7.6716
'.D. TE.-.GEB32
r I C!T I
@11- 3 6- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50ti@ 35'h
55 60 999 Total pct. pc@
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 29
13 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 pi 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1) 1) 1 9
0 0 0 0 @9 0 0 2 21- 29
0 0 1) 0
1 .9 34
0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2- 33
3 2 0 0 0 0 11 8 11 37
0 1 0 0 0 20 34
0 9
4 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 33
0 0 0 0 0 0 1) - 28
5 5 0 0 0 0 0 22 28 3
3 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 26 @, 3
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 26 32
52 16 0 0 0 0 201
APR 1 0 1
25424jaclynAvenue Moreno VallU, CA -,92557
tel 909-24Z6716 @fax 909..924-8604.
,4L@
Barbara N. Sackett - Counts Unlimited
@74
pages including co r
t.098VZGGOG a3-Liwi-i"n sinnoo
L abed -- '7092'7Z6606, WOJJ weo,7:9 966L 'LL !'dV AePsJn4i
:c':'CM OF TENECUU COWS UNLIMITED
CMUIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 0/96
7 DAY CWNT
NOMU)(D
0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
Time 5 10 15 20 25 -30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999
12:00 03/20
01:00 t k t
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00 t t
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 PR
Ol:W
02:00
03:00
04:DO 0 0 0 5 5 a 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26 132
0 30 26 @33
05:00 0 0 2 2 9 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 1
06:00 0 1 3 0 4 15 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 133
07:00 0 0 0 3 3 7 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 25 28 @34
08:00 0 0 1 2 3 3 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 21 36
09:00 0 0 1 0 4 5 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 28 @33
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 la 32 34
I 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 4 32 134
Day Totals 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 177 28
Totals 0 1 7 13 30 50 55 19 2 0 0 0 0 177
Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH
Median @ (50th percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH
85th Percentile speed 34 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 ?ff Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@r of Vehicles in Pace 105
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 59.99t
X@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
12 a6ed 1099126606, UJOJJ weol:g 966L ILL I!jdv Aepsinqi
site
."CITY OF TERCULA ODUNTS UNLIRITED : 152509
COMIC/BET TWILIGECT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Start@Dat6: 03'/21/96
7 DIY COUNT File r.
NORNM'ND pa(],2
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @th 8 5,th
Ti 35 40 60 999 Total 1
12:00 03/21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 *1 ;29
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03-.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 34
04:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 291 @39
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2
05:00 0 0 0 2 4 5
5 7
06:00 0 0 0 0 5 16 2 2 0 ri 0 0 0 2 21 @29
07:00 0 0 0 2 6 9 a 2 1 0 0 0 0 29 28 @@34
08:00 0 0 1 2 5 18 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 54 30, 134
09,.OO 0 0 0 1 2 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 31 134
10,.DO 0 0 1 3 6 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 21 24 ;33
11:00 0 0 1 2 6 14 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 26 @29
12:GO Pik 0 0 0 3 4 8 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 30 29 34
oi:oo 0 0 0 2 5 10 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 28 28 133
02:00 0 0 0 1 1 6 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 134
03:00 0 0 0 1 12 14 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 21, @33
04.00 0 0 0 1 6 12 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 37 29 33
05:00 0 0 0 2 4 11 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 44 31 134
06:00 0 0 0 1 7 11 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 23 !33
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 134
08:00 0 0 0 1 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 311 133
09:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 -- -- 16
10:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 137
11,00 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 32; 3
Day Totals 3 27 79 159 195 39 4 1 1 499 29'
Totals 0 0 3 27 79 159 185 39 4 1 0 0 1 498
Spted Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 HP]i
Median (50U percentile): 29 NPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPff
95th Percentile Speed 33 KPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 KPH
10 IN Pace Speed : 26-35 MN
of Vehicles in Pace 344
Percent of vehicles in Pace 69.061
N@r of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 RPH: .001
a3-Liwi-lNn s-LNnoo
aBEd -- @099@26606, wOl@ wPO-i:g 966L 'LL It V AePsJrlql
COWS UlfLIMITED site q'@ @: 152508
CITY OF TWULA StartiDate: 0 22/96
COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH SykR 909.247.6716 '/ 0
7 DLY MM File 1. TIC SHB
MORTMUND
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
T 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T,
12:00 03/22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 124
0 0 0 t
04:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
0 5 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 15 23 @36
05.00 0 0 0
0 0 27 28 133
06:00 0 0 0 0 6 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 24 29@ 36
07:00 0 0 0 1 6 5 7 3 2 0 0 0
58 28 133
08:00 0 0 2 1 6 23 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 31 28.1 j33
09:00 0 0 0 2 a 8 11 2 0 0 0 1
j34
10:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 32
11:00 0 0 0 4 5 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 36 29@ 114
1
0 0 38 27 @33
12:00 PR 0 0 3 1 8 12 10 4 0 0 0
0 0 1 4 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 281 132
01:00 0 1
02:00 0 0 1 0 6 18 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27 :33
03:00 0 0 0 2 10 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 281 @32
04:00 0 0 1 3 7 14 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 39 291, @34
05:00 0 0 1 0 6 11 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 29@ 34
06:00 0 0 1 1 6 14 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 36 28 @34
07:00 0 0 1 4 1 4 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 291 @133
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 10 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 27 29 '34
0 0 0 2 1 4 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 311 34
09:00 1 I
10:00 0 0 1 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 28. 132
1
1 7 0 1 0 11 321 33
Day Totals 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 54 : 9 28@
Totals 0 0 11 26 93 184 179 49 7 0 0 0 0 549
15th Percentile Speed 22 MP
P.,dian Speed (5M percentile): 29 NM
.kverage Speed - )Lll Vehicles 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MM
10 MM Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
N@er of Vehicles in Pace 363
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.00%
of Vehicles > 55 KPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH.- .00%
CEa-Liwi-INn S-LNnoo
'7 a ed -- @O9@Z6606, woil we0@:'g 9&6L 'LL ILJDV ePSJ@ql
COUNTS UNLIMITED
CITY OP memu
COSMIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 3/96
7 DAY COUNT
mnp?wllmn
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
T 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T
Ill.-OO 03/23 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 37 @139
0 0 0 0
02.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 39
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 34 137
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 139
1
0 0 0 0 0 22 31 137
06:00 0 0 0 2 1 7 7 5 1
07:00 0 0 0 3 6 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 29 27@ 133
08:00 0 0 0 3 4 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 31 271 132
09:00 0 0 0 2 12 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 27; 133
0 0 45 27@ 132
10:00 0 0 3 4 a 18 10 2 0 0 a 1
11:00 0 0 0 4 6 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 31 28 134
1
12.00 pii 0 0 0 4 17 13 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 26 .32
01:00 0 0 0 4 6 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 49 28@ 33
02:00 0 0 1 4 8 20 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 50 27 132
03:00 0 0 2 12 8 a 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 23 132
0 0 59 271 1.32
04:00 0 0 0 6 12 20 19 1 0 0 0 1
05:00 0 0 0 10 a 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 26' .@29
06:00 0 0 1 7 9 11 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 36 25 1.34
07:00 0 0 1 5 4 11 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 38 281 !33
08:00 0 0 0 1 4 17 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 29; @33
09:00 0 0 2 1 3 3 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 30@ 134
10:00 0 0 0 2 4 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 241 133
11:00 0 0 0 2 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
Day Totals 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 656 27@
Totals 0 0 10 77 123 227 171 45 3 0 0 0 0 65b
SWO statist!-.
15th Percentile Sped 20 MPH
Median S@ (50th percutile): 27 HPH
Averaqe Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 HPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@er of Vehicles in Pace 398
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60-58%
Nwtber of Vehicles > 55 MR 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 )M: .001
s a ed 109@26606, @OIA WeOl:g 966L 'LL l@jdv Aepsinq,i
cm or TEMUU COUNTS UNLIMITED a
COSKICIBET TWILIGHT NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 4/96
7 DLY COOT
XORTEMD
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50th@ 85th
T 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 T Y-t . pct.
12:00 03/24 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27 129
oi:oo 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27 @32
02.00 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 29 139
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 134
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
05-.00 0 2:' 139
06:00 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 28
07:00 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24 132
0 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 129
08:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 ;
09:00 0 0 0 1 3 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 281 1!33
10:00 0 0 0 3 7 9 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 33 28 :36
11:00 0 1 0 0 5 12 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 @32
1
12:00 pH 0 0 0 4 6 6 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 33
01:00 0 0 0 3 2 16 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 43 301; 34
02:00 0 0 1 1 5 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 29 271 33
03:00 0 0 0 4 7 15 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 44 211 31
04:00 0 0 1 0 12 13 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 47 28, 133
05:00 0 0 1 4 12 12 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 26 132
06:00 0 0 0 5 7 11 11 1 a 0 0 0 0 15 27 :33
07:00 0 0 0 5 7 12 3 0 a 0 0 0 0 27 26 129
08:00 0 0 0 1 6 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 25 281 34
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 271 32
10:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 23, 33
11:00 0 0 0 2 29@ 34
Day Totals 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 472 27
Totals 0 1 3 39 90 172 135 29 3 0 0 0 0 472
Mediam Speed (50th percentile): 27 MPH
Average Speed - AU Vehicles 23
85th PerceAtile Speed 33 MPH
9@ Percentile Speed 36 10
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace 307
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 64.90%
Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
9 1099@2661)6, -14 --O@-9 966L LL l@,dv Aeps-,n,,
CM OF TEI(ECOLK COO)rrS UMLIMITED Site ode@: lnz)ud
t@ @/25/96
CCSNIC/BET TWILIGHT & NORTH STKR 909.247.6716 Star Dat6: 0
7 DAY COM File D. T@@B
NOR Pa(3e I. I
Begin O- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @Oth 85tb
Ti*e 5 io 15 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total kt, Pt.
12:00 03/25 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 !29
OI:DO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 139
02:00 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 119
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 241 129
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 a 271 137
06:DO 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 28@ 34
4 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 8 9 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 16 301
OB:OG 0 0 1 1 9 19 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 50 28:; 33
0 0 13 26, 32
09.00 0 0 1 0 4 3 5 0 0 0 0
10:00 0 0 0 1 2 9 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 20 281 36
11:00 0 0 0 0 6 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 29; 32
12:00 PR 0 0 0 3 13 5 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 27@ 134
01:00 0 0 0 0 3 14 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 271 1
!34
02:00 0 0 0 0 7 a 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 28@ 36
03;00 0 0 0 0 5 19 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 29 133
04.00 0 0 2 2 2 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 28! 133
05:00 0 0 0 3 3 13 6 0 0 0 G 0 0 30 26@ 31
06:00 0 0 0 1 2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 27 36
08:00 0 0 0 0 6 6 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 24 29, 34
09:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 24 139
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 134
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *1 1*
Day Totals 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 415 28@
Totals 0 0 4 12 87 151 120 39 2 0 0 0 0 415
Statistics. -
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 KPH
kverage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MP]]
85tb Percentile Speed 33 KPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 RH Pace Speed 26-35 KPH
Nwaber of Vehicles in Pace 271
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 65.14%
Nwiber of Vehicles > 55 NFH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 NPII: .00%
Z a6ed 1099@26606, WOJA we0@:9 966L 'LL l@idy Aepsinq-
CITY . oF Tmuu COOI(TS UNLIMITED Site ode @: 152508
COSMIC/BL7 TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 StartiDate: 031/26/96
File D. T COSNB
7 DAY ODUNT
MORTHBOUN Page
&-qin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- oth@ 81 th
Tile 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Ict.i Pct.
12:00 03/26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 29@ @34
04:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 221 124
05:00 0 0 1 0 2 a 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29' 33
06:00 0 0 0 0 6 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 26. 32
07.-DO 0 0 2 1 3 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 28; 133
08:00 0 0 0 2 5 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 34 28@ 133
09:00 0 0 0 4 2 9 a 2 0 0 0 0 0 25 281 @33
10:00 0 0 0 1 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 ;33
11:00 0 1 0 0 6 7 6 3 0 0 a 0 0 23 281 '34
12:00 pit 0 0 1 2 7 5 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 27! 33
01;00 0 0 1 0 5 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 19 291 33
02:00 0 0 3 4 8 16 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 47 27; 34
03:00 0 0 0 4 2 19 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 28' 33
04:00 0 0 0 0 5 6 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 23 31@
05:00 0 0 1 3 7 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 26;i 32
06:00 0 1 0 1 a 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 27@ 133
07:00 0 0 0 0 4 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 27 129
08:00 0 0 0 1 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 29.1 133
09:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 31. @37
10:00 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 27: 29
11:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19. 29
Day Totals 2 9 24 80 145 119 30 3 2 414 28@"
Totals 0 2 9 24 80 145 119 30 3 2 0 0 0 414
SNO Statisti@.
15th Percentile 21 MPH
Median S@ (50th percentile),. 28 MPH
Average speed - All VebLicies 28 MPH
85th Percentile Sped 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 WR
10 PH Pace @ed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace 264
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 63.61%
@r of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 )M: .00%
a3-Liwi-iNn si"noo
9 a6ed -- t?099@26606, WOJA weol:g 966L 'LL ltjdv Aepsinql
CITY OF TENECUU COUNTS U)(LIMITED Site;Codd - 1525N
Star Dat I e: 0'3/27196
@C/BM TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247,6716
7 DAY COW File @I.D.1 T'*NB
NOR D Pa(p
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- .50th 85th
Tille 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Total Pct. pct.
12:00 03/27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 *. 29
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
O(:OO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
05:00 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 11
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 la 29 33
07:00 0 0 0 3 4 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 la 2@l 33
08:00 0 0 2 1 10 18 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 47 2@ 33
09:00 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 31
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 10 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 35
11:00 0 0 1 2 3 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 27. 32
12:00 pi 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 33
01:00 0 0 0 1 4 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 21 28 34
02:00 0 0 3 1 a 15 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 38 27 33
03:00 0 0 0 1 9 20 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 49 2& 33
Totals 0 1 G 10 48 109 50 24 3 0 0 0 0 281
@d Statistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
median S@ (50U percentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All vehicles 29 Wu
95th Percentile S@ 33 MM
95th Percentile Speed 37 KPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 KPB
Naber of Vehicles in Pace 189
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 67.02t
Munber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
a3iiwi-iNn sinnoo
6 abed -- 1099'726606, WOJA WEOI:V 966L 'LL i-!J V A-PSJ-qi
Apr,
25,124jac@ Avenue Moreno Val@, CA 92557
tel 909.247-6716 &fax 909.924.8604
4
i -n
Barbara N. Sackett - Counts Unl'i ited
11-7
pages including cover
t abed 17099@Z6606, @OJI @LZO:LL 966L 'LL I sin4i
ClIfy or @mu COMS UNLIMITED @ite c@ . i.52502
@mic/@'ET TWILIGHT NorH STAR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 63/20/96
7 UY SPEED SURVEY ile I.D. TDCOWI
%UT@ aqe:
0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50@ 95th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 i5 50 55 60 999 Totli pct.! Pct.
12:00 03@20
Oi:oo
02:00 k
03:00
05:00
06:00 k t
07:00
08:00
09:00 t
10:00
ii:oo
12:00 p t
01:00
02:00 Jr
03:00
04:00 0 0 0 3 14 21 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 26, 32
05:00 0 0 0 5 13 12 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 33
06:00 0 1 0 5 a 19 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 2i 31
07,.OO 1 0 1 0 4 2 10 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 9 2@ 34
08:00 0 0 1 5 7 12 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 33
09:00 0 0 0 2 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 29
10:00 0 0 0 1 3 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 37
:oo 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 34
Day Tota ls 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 1 22 2
Totals 0 2 1 25 49 98 54 20 2 0 0 0 1 22
@LaLisLics.
I 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH
Median Speed (@ percentile): 27 KPH
Average All Vehicles 28 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace SpW 26-35 MPH
N@ of Vehicles in Pace 152
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 60.281
Number of Vehicles ) 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 M: .001
(i3-Liwji-iNn si-Nnoz)
2 aBLd -- @099'726606, IJOJJ IIU20:LL 966L 'LL IIJ V AePsJnPi
CITY OF TD(@ COU]FTS 0)(LIHITED @ite Cod@ 52502
COMC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH ST)LR 909.247.6716 tart Date: 03/21/96
1
ill I.Dl TEOOSBPL
7 DAY SPEED SURVE71
Pace@
SOUTHMD 1
Bqin 0- 6- II- 16- 21- 26- 3I- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @50th a5th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot@i Pctl pct.
2:00 Oi]21 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 32
1
Oi:oo 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19
24
05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34
06:00 0 0 0 0 5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 33
07:00 0 0 1 0 7 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 33
08:00 0 0 0 0 5 26 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 13
09:00 u 0 0 3 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 32
10.,OO 0 0 1 0 2 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 31 33
ii:oo I 0 0 1 4 4 14 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 32
12;00 p@ 0 0 1 1 5 13 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 34
oi:oo 0 0 1 5 2 13 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 21@ 34
02:00 0 0 1 1 10 13 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 32
03:00 0 0 0 3 4 23 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 33
04:00 0 0 0 2 4 22 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@ 34
u(i v 0 0 1 11 22 17 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 28 33
06:oo 0 0 0 2 8 25 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 33
08:00 0 0 1 2 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 32
09:oo 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 32
2@ 31
10:00 0 0 0 0 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
11:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 29
Ddy Tot 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 5 2 2
Totals 0 0 7 28 88 243 190 35 1 0 0 0 0 5 2
sdeed St I atistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median @?* (50th percentile),. 28 MPH
kjerage Speed - All Vehicles 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 NM
95th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 PH
Haber of Vehicles in Pace 433
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 73.02%
X@r of Vehicles ) 55 WR 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .00%
a3-Liwi-i"n s-L"noo
2 a ed -- @099126606, WOJA Wezo:LL 966L 'TL-ltj V epsinqi
CITY OF TEXECUIK COL'ffS UNLINITL7D s te code@: 152502
COSKIC/BRT TWILIGHT NORTH ST@R 909.247.6716 s.tart,Dat@: 03/22/96
@ile I.D.
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY : TECOSBPI
scc P<Iioe
0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- @hl 85th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999
111:00 03 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 !32
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 1
02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1 24
03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 32 :34
05:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 '5 24 29
06.00 0 0 0 0 4 7 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 @7 271 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 6 12 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 281 @33
08,00 0 0 0 0 9 20 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 @7 28! 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 @3 281 @34
10-.OO 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,b 281 32
11:00 0 0 0 0 5 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 29 33
12:00 pi: 0 0 0 2 11 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 27 32
oi:oo 0 0 0 4 3 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 27 33
02:00 0 0 0 3 a 18 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 271 33
03:00 0 0 0 4 9 27 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 271 32
04:00 1 0 0 1 2 9 20 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 27 32
05:00 0 0 0 1 5 25 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 34
06:00 0 0 0 3 12 26 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 28 33
07:00 0 0 0 3 6 15 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 2@ 33
08:00 0 0 1 4 3 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 & 2 7, 32
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@, 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 10 4 0 a 0 0 0 0 17 2@ 31
11:00 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .6 26 29
Day Tot@ 2 30 112 249 176 32 1 1 6( 2 21
Totais 0 0 2 30 112 248 176 32 1 0 0 0 1 6(2
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median @ (-'Oth Mcentile): 28 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles 28 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed : 36 KPII
10 El Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace : 424
cent of Vehicles in Pace 70.41t
per
Nwber of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: ODt
t,09 St, Z 05 6 0 6 (E3-Llwl-]Nn SiNnoo
-6-d -- -70913',26606, --'A --ZO-LL 966L 'LL ILDV A@p@,llq-
COUIFTS UNLIMITED ite Cod 152502
COSMIC/B I ET TWILIGHT )IORTH STAR 909.247.6716 tart . Dat@: 03/23/M
7 DAY SF , EED SURVEY ile I.D.@ TEXSBPI
Ne ; I
6- II- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- 50tl' 85th
1 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Tot 1 pct . @t,
12:00 03/23 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 2@ 32
OL.,OO 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2@ 32
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 34
03:DO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
04-00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 3 2 34
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 21 37
07:00 0 0 0 2 3 8 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 @1 2f 33
0 0
08:00 0 0 0 3 7 10 11 3 0 0 0 @4 2@ 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 20 31
4 33
10:00 0 0 0 2 3 11 6 2 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 0 0 1 1 2 15 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 33
12:00 p' 0 0 0 1 6 14 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 33
oi:oo 0 0 1 4 6 15 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 32
02:00 0 0 0 2 6 23 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 32
03:00 0 0 1 2 8 14 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2@ 33
04:00 0 0 0 1 13 20 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 2 32
05:00 0 0 0 1 11 16 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 J3 28 33
06:00 0 0 0 2 8 19 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 8 15 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 2@ 33
08'.00 0 0 0 1 6 12 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 21 33
09:00 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 36
lo.-Do 0 0 0 1 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 33
11:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 $3 34
Day Totals 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 6.6 21
Totals 0 0 3 28 113 243 184 42 3 0 0 0 0 6 .6
s@ @tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 UH
Median @d (50th percentile): 28 WE
Average Speed - All Vehicles : 29 MPH
85th Percentile Speed : 33 MPH
95th Percentile Speed : 36 UH
10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH
Nw&r of Vehicles in Pace : 427
Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 69.21@t
K@ of Vehicles > 55 )n : a
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
@o -d (X3-LIWI-INn s.LNnoo
6-id -- '10991726606, --I --ZO-LL 966L 'LL 1,,dv A.P@1,14.1
CITY Of TEMMU COUNTS UNLIMITED ite @C04 : 152502
t@ Date. 6 /24/96
@IC/BEY TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 3
7 DAY SKED SURVEY tile';I.D.1 TECOSBPL
SOUTHBOBND -tage
@50 35th
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61-
. i
Tin i 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totil Pctl Pct.
12.,OO 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24' 28
01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 34
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 34
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 :5 2@ 31
06:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 37
07:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 33
32
08:00 0 0 0 2 8 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @3 20
09:00 0 0 0 1 5 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 @8 21 32
10:00 0 0 0 2 4 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 )1 2@ 32
11:00 0 0 1 4 a 16 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 21 32
12:00 pik, 0 0 0 1 7 20 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 32
01:00 0 0 0 5 9 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 24 32
0
02:00 0 0 0 1 10 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 32
03:00 0 0 0 0 9 24 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 3
1 21 32
04.00 0 0 0 3 5 20 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 2@ 32
O@:uu u 0 0 3 8 15 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 33
06:00 0 0 0 1 6 19 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 11 23 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 33
09,00 0 0 0 2 7 13 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2@ 33
3
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 13 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 2@ 33
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 29 34
11:00 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 33
Day Totals 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 k 5@8 2
Totals 0 0 1 30 120 251 154 27 5 0 0 0 0 5
s@ s@tistics,
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median (50th percentile): 27 MPH
Average Speed - All Vehicles : 28 MM
85th Percentile Speed : 33 PR
95th Percentile Speed : 35 MPE
10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 PR
N@r of Vehicles in Pace : 405
Percent of Vehicles in Pace : 68.76t
of Vehicles > 55 MM : 0
Percent of Veb-icles > 55 KPH: .00%
9 0 A 6,SOCI (i@-Liwi-ii-4n s-LNno:D
9 a6ed -- @099'7Z5606, WOJA we?O:LL 956L 'LL l@jdv Aepsinqi
CM OF:TEKECULA COUKTS UMUNITED 152502
ODSHIC/T TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 63/25/96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSBPL
SOUTHMD
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 11- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- ;50th $5th
Time 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 Totial ;Pct@ Pct.
12:00 01/25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2, 34
05:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 29
.6 22 29
06:00 0 0 0 3 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 2@ 33
08:00 0 0 0 0 a 22 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 4.8 2@ 33
09:00 0 0 0 0 5 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 2@ 34
10:00 0 0 0 0 7 18 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 @5 2@ 32
LL:DO 0 0 1 1 13 10 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 2@. 33
12:00 p4 0 0 0 0 4 21 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 2@ 33
01:00 0 0 0 2 10 8 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 33
02:00 0 0 0 3 10 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 33
03:00 0 0 1 1 8 23 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 28 33
04:00 0 0 2 1 6 26 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 21 32
05:00 0 0 0 1 9 22 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 23 33
06:00 0 0 0 1 12 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 @1 27 33
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 7 3 36
08:00 0 0 0 1 6 8 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 6 2 37
5
09:00 0 0 0 1 4 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 34
10.00 0 0 0 2 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32
11:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 3- 34
Day Totads 4 18 125 223 164 39 5
5@8 2
Totals 0 0 4 18 125 223 164 39 5 0 0 0 0 5.8
SDeed S@tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 MPH
Median Speed (5ft percentile); 28 MPH
kvp-rage @ - All Vehicles 29
85th Percentile Speed 33 KM
95th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace 387
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 66.841
N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
t-098 t, Z6 60.5 (,3-Liwi-iF4n S-LNnoo
Z a6ed -- @092'726606, -JA WEZO:LL 966L
CrTy OF. COUFM URJMITFD @ite-Cod( : 152502
CDSHIC/AET TWILIGHT & NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 Star@ Dale: 93/26/96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY TECOSEP1
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- :50t 8,5th
Tile 5 10 15 20 25 IQ 35 40 45 50 55 60 999 To@l :Pct@ Pct.
12:00 01/26 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 134
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34
oi-oo
0 2 32 34
02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24
04:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 r4 3 33
05:00 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 2 34
06:00 0 0 0 2 2 11 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 @2 2 134
07:00 0 0 1 2 5 9 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 2 34
08:00 0 1 1 1 10 30 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 61 2 32
09:00 0 1 0 1 a 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 32
10:00 0 0 0 0 3 9 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 33
11:00 0 0 0 0 a 12 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 33
12-00 pl 0 1 0 3 9 14 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 2@ 33
Ol-.00 0 0 3 2 6 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 2( 32
02:00 1 0 0 4 11 20 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 @1 2-, 33
03:00 0 0 0 0 13 30 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 33
04:00 0 0 1 4 1 19 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 2@ 33
05:00 0 0 1 2 10 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 2 32
06:00 0 0 0 3 12 29 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 33
07:00 0 0 0 1 5 17 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33
21 33
08.00 0 0 0 1 8 11 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
09:00 0 0 0 1 7 12 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 33
0 4 a 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
10@,00 0 0 0 2" '33
11.00 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2@ 34
Day Totals 1 3 a 28 128 282 215 42 2 79 24
Totals 1 3 8 28 129 292 215 42 2 0 0 a 0 7@
s6tistics.
15th Percentile Speed 22 WH
Median Speed (50th percentile): 28 PR
Aver@ Speed - All Vebicles 29 MPH
95th Percentile Speed 33 RH
9,5th Percentile S@ 36 M
10 MPfi Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
Nwiber of Vehicles in Place 497
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.02%
N@ of Vehicles > 55 MPH 0
Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH: .001
a3-Liwi-i"n s-LNnoo
9 a6ed -- 1098'726606, woja wezo:Lt 966L 'LL It v Aepsj,,qi
@ii CITY OF TEMMU COUNTS UNLIMITED @ite Cm : 152502
CMIC/BET TWILIGHT NORTH STAR 909.247.6716 tart e: 03/27/96
7 DAY SPEED SURVEY ile,I.D TEMSBPI
SOUTHBOUNI) aael
Begin 0- 6- 11- 16- 21- 26- 31- 36- 41- 46- 51- 56- 61- ;50tl 85th
Tile 5 10 15 0 35 40 45 50 5 60 999 Totil Pct. Pct.
12.-OO O@127 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 139
01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 34 34
02.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
03:00 2 3;
04:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 34
05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 34
06:00 0 0 0 0 2 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 !1 21 33
07:00 0 1 0 4 a 13 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 21 33
08:00 0 0 0 2 9 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 @8 2.1 32
09,.OO 0 0 0 0 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 2@ 32
10:00 0 0 0 1 4 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 2" 33
11:00 0 0 1 1 5 15 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2( 33
12:00 pa 0 0 1 3 4 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 @3 2-@ 32
01:00 0 1 0 3 4 4 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 3( 33
02:00 0 0 1 1 11 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2, 32
03:00 0 0 0 2 10 20 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2@ 33
Totals 0 2 3 17 61 132 113 20 1 0 0 0 0 3@4
S@d @tistim,
15th Percentile S @ d 22 MPH
Median S@ (50th percentile): 28 RP]l
Average Speed - All Vehicles 29 KPH
85th Percentile speed 33 PH
95th Percentile 5@ 36 KPH
10 MPH Pace Speed 26-35 MPH
@r of Vehicles in Pace 250
Percent of Vehicles in Pace 70.421
Nuga of vehicles > 55 WH 0
Percent of Vehicles 55 MPH: .00%
60 -li a3llWl-lHn s-LNfio3
@6 a6ed -- lO92'7Z6606, wojj wezo:LL 966L 'L It, V Apsn'41
,KPPE DI)C
44cil
507 -32- Div. 1
Relevant Market Area
507. The 'relevant market area' is any area within a radius of 10 miles
from the site of a potential new dealership.
Added Ch. 996, Stats@ 1973. Operfitive July 1, 1974.
Remanufactured Vehicle
uct
507.5. A"remanufacturedvehicle"isaveliiclethathasbeenconstr ed
by a licensed remanufacturer and consists of any used or reconditioned
integral parts, including, but not limited to, frame, engine, transmission,
axles, brakes, or suspension. Remanufactured vehicles may be sold under a
distinctive trade name. An existing vehicle which is incidently repaired,
restored, or modified by replacing or adding parts or accessories is not a
remanufactured vehicle.
Added Ch. 1286, Stat-4. 1983. Effective.january 1, 1984.
Remanufacturer
507.8. A'remanufacturer"isanypersonwlioforcommission,money,or
other thing of value, produces a vehicle that consists of any used or
reconditioned integral parts, including, but not limited to, frame, engine,
transmission, axles, brakes, or suspension which is subject to registra tion
under this code. A remanufacturer is not a person who incidently repairs,
restores, or modifies an existing vehicle by replacing or adding parts or
accessories.
Added Ch. 1286, Stats. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984.
Renter
508. A 'renter' is a person who is engaged in the business of renting,
leasing or bailing vehicles for a term not exceeding four months and for a
fixed rate or price.
Added Ch. 1284, Stats. 1976. Effective,lanuary 1, 1977.
Repair Shop
510. A 'repair shop' is a place where vehicles subject to registration
under this code are repaired, rebuilt, reconditioned, repainted, or in any way
maintained for the public at a charge.
Representative
512.A 'representative' is any person regularly employed by a
i
manufacturer or distributor for the purpose of negotiating or promoting the . I
sale of the manufacturer's or distributor's vehicles to their franchisees or for
regularly supervising or contacting franchisees or prospective franchisees in
this state for any purpose.
Added Ch. 996, Stats. 1973. Operative July 1, 1974.
t
Residence L)istrict I
515. A'residencedistrict"isthatportionofahighwayandtheproperty
contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which "
highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property
fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or
business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively,
within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting
thereon is Occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or buliireas
structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a rm'@e if
the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures tr the
length of the highway exists.
Div. 1 -33- 527
Resident
516.'Resident' means any person who manifests an intent to live o be
r
located in this state on more than a temporary or transient basis. Presence
in the state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a
rebuttable presumption of residency.
i@ The following are evidence of residency for purposes of vehicle
registration:
(a)Address where registered to vote.
(b)Location of employment or place of business.
(c)Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education,
(d)Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school.
tion.
(e)Filing a homeowner's property tax exemp
(f)Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence.
(g)Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or
@l benefit not ordinarily extended to a nonresident.
(h)Possession of a California driver's license,
he state
I (i) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in t
' ,
d is more than temporary or transient.
i) Added Ch. 409, Stats. lc)83. Effective January 1, 1984.
Amended Ch. 13, StaL,. 1991. Effective February 13, 1991 by terms of an urgency cinuqe.
Retail Sale
520. A 'retail sale' is a sale of goods to a person for the purpose of
consumption and use, an(] not for resate to others, including, but not limited
to, an arrangement where a motor vehicle is consigned to a dealer for sile,
Added Ch. 1284, Stats. 1976. Effective January 1, 1977,
Retarder
521. A 'retarder' is a device, other than a brake, which, when activated
by the driver, applier, a retarding force to the wheels of a vehicle without the
use Of friction. A retarder may be installed in or on the engine, exhaust
system, drive train, or wheels of a motor vehicle, or an axle or wheels of a
towed vehicle. A retarder May operate by altering the valve timing of the
engine, by controlling the flow of a circulating fluid, by applying an
electromagnetic force, by controlling the release of gases from the exhaust
system, or by other means. A retarder may or may not be capable of stopping
the vehicle upon which it is installed.
'i Added Ch. 648, Stats. lg()I. Fffective January 1, 1992.
i
Ridesharing
522. 'Ridesharing' means two or more persons traveling by any i-nodp,
including, but not limited to, carpooling, vanpooling, buspooling, taxipooling,
jitney, and public transit.
Added Ch, i85, Stats. 1982. FfTective January 1, 1983. supersedes Ch. 46.
, ; i
Amended Ch. 193, Stats. 198 I. Effective January 1, 1985.
Right-of-way
525. "Right-of-way'itheprivilegeoftlieimmediateuseofthehigliway.
Road
527. (a) 'Road' means any existing vehicle route established before
January 1, 1979, with significant evidence of prior regular travel by vehicles
subject to registration Pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 4000)
of Chapter 1 of Division 3; provided, that a road' does not mean any route
traversed exclusively by bicycles as defined in Section 39001, motorcycles as
defined in Section 400, motor-driven cycles as defined in Section 405, or off-
highway motor vehicles as defined in Section 38012.
22113 @46- Div. 11
system shall not be operated at any place where traffic is controlled by a
traffic officer or official traffic control signal. The schoolbus flashing red
signal lights, ainber warning lights, and stop signal arm system shall not be
operated at any other time.
(b) The driver shall stop to load or unload pupils only at a schoolbus stop
designated forpupils by the school district superintendent or authorized by
the superintendent for school activity trips.
(c) When pupils need to cross a highway or private road upon which the
schoolbus is stopped, at a location where traffic is not controlled by a traffic
officer or official traffic control signal, the driver shall do all of the following:
(1) Check for approaching traffic in all directions and activate the
flashing red light signal system and stop signal arm, as defined in Section
25257, if equipped with a stop signal arm, only when safe to do so.
(2) Before opening the door, ensure that the flashing red signal lights and
stop signal arm are activated, and that it is safe to exit the schoolbus.
(3) Escort all pupils in prekindergarten, kindergarten, or any of grades 1,
to 8, inclusive, across the highway or private road. The driver shall use an
approved hand-held STOP sign while escorting all pupils.
(4) Require all pupils to walk in front of the bus as they cross the highway
or private road.
(5) Ensure that all pupils who need to cross the highway or private road
have crossed safely, and that all other unloaded pupils andpedestrians are
a safe distance from the bus and it is safe to move before setting the bus in
motion.
(d) A school district may designate selected schoolbus stops as
stops that may reqt4rire the activation of the @hing red light as
required in subdivision (a) even though there are no pupils crossing
the roadway. These stops shall only be so designated because they
present unique traffi-c hazards which can only be addressed by the
use of the @hing red lights. No school district shall designate a
schoolbus stop under this subdivision without the prior approval of
the department and the agency having traly-tc engineering
responsibility for the street on which the stop is located.
Amended Ch. 553, Stats. 1977. Effective January 1, 1978.
Amended Ch. 813, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982.
Amended Ch. 624, Stats. 1992. Efrective September 14, 1992 by terms ofan urgency clause.
Amended Ch. 831, Stats. 1994. Effective September 27, 1994, by terms oran urgency clause.
The 19q4 Hmendment added the italicized material, and at the point(s) indicated, deleted the
following:
1. 'the'
2. a.
Local Authorities
22113. This chapter does not prevent local authorities, by ordinance,
from prohibiting the making of any turning movement by any vehicle at any
intersection or between any designated intersections.
Div. 11 @47- 22350
C R 7. SPEED LAws
Article 1. Generally
Excessive Speed and Designated Lane Use
22348. (a) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 22351, no person
shall drive a vehicle upon a highway with a speed limit established pursuant
to Section 22349 or 22356 at a speed greater than that speed limit.
(b) Any person who drives a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater
than 100 miles per hour is guilty of an infraction punishable, as follows:
(1) Upon a first conviction of a violation of this subdivision, by a fine of
not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). The court may also suspend the
privilege of the person to operate a motor vehicle for a period not to exceed
30 days pursuant to Section 13200.5.
(2) Upon a conviction under this subdivision of an offense which occurred
within three years of a prior offense resulting in a conviction of an offense
under this subdivision, by a fine of not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500).
The person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shah be suspended by the
Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 13355.
(3) Upon a conaction under this subdivision of an offense which occurred
within five years of two or more prior offenses resulting in convictions of
offenses under this subdivision, by a fine of not to exceed five hundred dollars
($500). The person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle shall be suspended
by the Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to subdivision (b) of Seci.ion
13355.
(c) Any vehicle subject to Section 22406 shall be driven in a lane
designated pursuant to Section 21655, or if no lane has been so designated,
in the right-hand lane for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand
edge or curb. When ov4r.taking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the
same direction, the drivers shall use either the designated lane, the lane to
the @'
I @mmediate left of the right-hand lane, or the right-hand lane for tramc
as permitted under this code. If, however, specific lane or lanes have not been
designated on a divided highway having four or more clearly marked lanes
for traffic in one direction, any such vehicle may also be driven in the lane to
the immediate left of the right-hand lane, unless otherwise prohibited under
thii code. This subdivision does not apply to a driver who is preparing for a
left-or right-hand turn or who is in the process of entering into or exiting
from a highway or to a driver who is required necessarily to drive in a lane
other than the right-hand lane to continue on his or her intended route.
Added Ch. 1218, Stats. 1973. OpcrRtive January 1, 1974.
Amended Ch. 153, Stats. 1975. Effective June 28, 1975 by terms of an urgency clilu-te.
Amended Ch. 217, Stats. 1978. Effective June 8, 1978 by terms of an urgency clauqe.
Amended Ch. 980, Stats. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984.
Amended Ch. 276, Stats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985,
Amended Ch. 72, Stats. 1987. Effective June 30, 1987, by terms of an urgency c]Fiu,.ie. Super-
sedes Ch. 25.
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a
vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour.
Added Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 1735, Stats. 1963. EtY'cctive September 20, 1963.
,L-t:ended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective Mav 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency cloure.
Bask @L'-ed Law
@ 2235@7No r"sonshalldriveavehicleuponahighwnyataspeedgrefiter
than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the,
traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a
22351 -648- Div. 11
speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Amended Ch. 252, StRts. 1963. EfTective September 20, 1963.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the
limitsspecified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is
lawfulunless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b)The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie
speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is
prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent
evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation
of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then
existing.
its are as follows and shall be applicable
in this code and, if so changed, only when signs
ice thereof-
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last loo feet
of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and
unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a
distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision
does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human
flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway
crossing signal device is installed but do-es not then indicate the immediate
approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100
feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver does not have a
clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of
the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all
those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield
right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley. -r bQ
Lb) TwentX-fi ].q p
v,- ml llr,-
(1)On any hi hway @ther than a state hiL7'hway, in any business or
resinless a diiierent Speed is determined by local aut onty
undet forth in this code.
(2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to
a highway and posted with a standard 'SCHOOL@ warning sign, whil
children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours oer
during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when
passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a
fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children
and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL' warning sign.
(3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior
citizens, contiguous to a street othl Ir than a state highway and posted with a
standard 'SENIOR" warning sign, A local authority is not required to erect
any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources
covering those costs are received and the local agency in akes a determination
that the proposed Signing should be implemented. A local authority may
however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection ofthose'
signs.
Amended Ch. 1996, Stats. 1959.1959. Effectiveseptember 18, 1959. Supersedes Ch. 11.
Amended Ch. 530, Stats. I()6 I. Effective September 15,196 1.
Div. 1 1 -649- 22356
Amended Ch. 409, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20,1963. Supersedes Ch. 397.
Amended Ch. 813, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982.
Amended Ch. r>42, Stats, 1990. Effective January 1, 1991. Supersedes Ch. 441.
Decrease of State Highway Limits
22354, Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon
the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per
hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway
where the limit of 55 miles is applicable, the department may determine and
declare a prima facie speed limit of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30 or 25 miles per hour,
whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of
traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit
shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected
upon the highway.
Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Efrective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 645, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Amended Ch. 25, SL&ts. 1987. Effective @lay 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause.
Speed Limit Change: Consultation and Consideration
Requirements
22354.5. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines,
upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease
the existing speed limit on a particular portion of a state highway pursuant
to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit,
consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the
Department ofthe California Highway Patrol.
(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through
which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may
conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a
convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The
Department oftransportation shall take into consideration the results ofthe
public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the spe@
limit.
Added Ch. 219, Stats. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992.
Variable Speed Limits
22355. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon
the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the safe and orderly
movement of traffic upon any state highway which is a freeway will be
facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits, the department
may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a
freeway, or any portion thereof, which signs shall be so designed as to permit
d . isplay of different speed limits at various times of the day or night. Such
signs need not conform to the standards and specifications established by
regulations of the Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400,
but shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the
applicable speed limit. The speed limit upon the freeway at a particular time
Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective Septfmber 18,1959.
and place shall be that which is then and there displayed upon such sign.
Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1973. Effective JFnuary 1, 1974.
Increase of Freeway Limit
22356. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation, after
consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol,
determines upon the basis of in engineering and traffic survey on existing
( ) I highway segments, or upon the basis of appropriate design standards
and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed ( ) I highway
22357 -650- Div. 11
segments, that a speed greater than 55 miles per hour would facilitate the
0
rderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon
any state highway, or portion thereof, 2 that is I otherwise subject to a
maximum speed limit of 55 miles per hour, the Department of
Transportation, with the approval of the Department of the Califo mia
Highway Patrol, may declare a higher maximum speed of 60 or 65 miles per
hour for vehicles not subject to Section 22406, and shall cause
appropriate signs to be erected giving notice thereof. The Department of
Transportation shall only make a determination under this section that is
fully consistent with, and in full compliance with, federal law.
(b) No person shall drive a vehicle upon that highway at a speed greater
than 60 or 65 miles per hour, as posted.
Repealed Ch. I 1, stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Added Ch. 1735, Stgts. 1963, Effective September 20, 1963.
Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Effective November 8,1967.
Amended Ch. 632, Stats. 1969. Effective November 10, 1969. Supersedes Ch. 91 and Ch. 138.
Amendp,d Ch. 545, StaLq. 1975. Effective January 1, 1975.
Amended Ch. 579, Stats. 1984. Effective January 1, 1985.
Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause.
Amended Ch. 41, Stats. 1988. Effective March 18, 1988, by terms of an urgency clause.
Amended Ch. 1220, Statg. 1994. Effective September 30, 1994, by terms of an urgency clause.
The 1994 amendment adile(I the italicized material, and at the point(s) indicated, deleted the
following
1.'freeway"
2.'which'
3.'a freeway with full control ofaccess and without crossings at grade'
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour
would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be
reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise
subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by
ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45,
or 50 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 55 miles per hour,
whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of
tramc and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum
speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are
erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the
basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The provisions of this section does
not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when
passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior
center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
Amended Ch. 11, Statq. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 631, Stats. 1969. EfFective November 10, 1969.
Amended Ch. 25, Statg. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms ofan urgency clause.
Amended Ch. 542, StFits. 1990. Efrective January 1, 1991. Supersed es Ch. 441.
Decrease Near Childron's Playgrounds
22357.1. Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by
ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on
any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children's playground
in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are
expected to use the facilities. The 25 miles per hour speed limit shall be
effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.
Added Ch. 508, Slats, 1989. Effective January 1, 1990.
[-Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenev@r a local authority determines upon the basis of an
Div. 11 @51- 22359
engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more
highway where the limit of 55 miles per hour is applicable, the local
than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state
M'
authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed li it
of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found mo t
appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable
and safe, 'Which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when
appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
Amended Ch. 11, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency clause.
Decrease on Narrow Street
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per
hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street
having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway,
is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or
resolution determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles
per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe.
The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs
giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.
Added Ch. 1614, Stats. 1%5. Effective September 17, 1965.
kmended Ch. 1095, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973. Supersedes Ch. 372.
Decrease of Local Limits Near Schools or Senior Centers
22358.4. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per
hour established by paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is
more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or
resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles
per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by such
survey. The ordinance or resolution shall not be effective until appropriate
signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in
the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the
Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon
the highway.
Added Ch. 102, Stats. 1974. Effective Januory 1, 1975.
Amended Ch. r>42, Stats. 1990. Effective January 1, 1991. Supersedes Ch. 441.
Downward Speed Zoning@
22358.5. ItistheintentoftheLegi-.3laturethatphysicalconditionssuch
as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition
readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not
require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is
sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Added Ch. II, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1951).
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where
portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted
under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion
until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street
concerned have approved the same. Tlii@-, section shall not apply in the case
of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different
jurisdictions.
Amended Ch. 209, Stats. 1963. Effective Apt if 29, 1963.
22360 @52- Div. 11
Linking Districts on Local Highways
22360. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more
than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state
highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between districts,
either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare
a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 55 miles per hour,
but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit
shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected
upon the street or highway.
Amended Ch. II, Sta tm. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 25, Stats. 1987. Effective May 28, 1987, by terms of an urgency cl Ruse.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways
different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways
under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
Amended Ch. 209, Stats. 1.%3. Effective April 29, 1963.
Speed Limit Where Per-sons at Work
22362. It is prima facie a violation of the basic speed law for any person
to operate a vehicle in excess of the posted speed limit upon any portion of a
highway where officers or employees of the agency having jurisdiction of the
same, or any contractor of the agency or his employees, are at work on the t
roadway or within the right-of-way so close thereto as to be endangered by
passing traffic. This section applies only when appropriate signs, indicating
the limits of the restricted zone, and the speed limit applicable therein, are
placed by such agency within 400 feet of each end of such zone. The signs
shall display the figures indicating the applicable limit, which shall not be
less than 25 miles per hour, and shall indicate the purpose of the speed
restriction. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to relieve any operator of
a vehicle from complying with the basic speed law.
Amended Ch. 515, Stats. 1970. Effective November 23, 1970.
Restrictions Because of Snow or ice Conditions
22363. Notwitlistanding any speed limit that may be in effect upon the
highway, the Department of Transportation in respect to state highways, or
a local authority with respect to highways under its jurisdiction, may
determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per
hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe basei'-
on the prevailing snow or ice conditions upon such highway or any portion
thereof. Signs may be placed and removed as snow or ice conditions vary.
Amended Ch. 515, Slats. 1970. Effective November 23, 1970.
Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Lane Speed Limits
22364. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon
the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, that the safe and orderly
movement of traffic upon any state highway will be facilitated by the
establishment of different speed limits for the various lanes of traffic, the
department may place signs upon the state highway, or any portion thereof.
The signs shall designate the speed limits for each of the lanes of traffic.
Adiled Ch. 1542, Stats. 1965. Effective September 17, 1965.
Amended Ch. 545, StnLq. 1974. Effective irnuary 1, 1975.
Amended Ch. 681, Stats. 1982. Efrective January 1, 1983.
Div. 11 @53- 22402
Locally Imposed Prima Facie Speed Limit
22365. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision, of law, tny
county or city, which is contained, in whole or in par4 within the
South Coast Air Quality Management District, may, if the count.i, or
city deter7nines that it is necessary to achieve or maintain state or
federal ambient air quality standards lbr particulate matter,
determine and declare by ordinance apr-ima facie speed limit that is
lower than that which the county or city is otherwise permitted by
this code to establish, for any unpaved road within thejur-isdictiori of
the county or city and within the district That declared pr-ima fricie
speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice
ther-eof ar-e erected along the road-
(b) 7his section shall remain in effect only until Januar-y 1, 1.1)97,
and as of that date is repeated unless a later enacted statute, wh ich
is enacted before January 1, 1997, deletes or extends that date.
Added Ch. 024, Stats. 1994. Effective September 28, 1994, by terms of an urgency clnuse.
Repealed Ch. 924, St-atm. 1994. Effective September 28, 1994. Operative January 1, 1997@
NOTE:This section shall remain In effect only until January 1, 1997, nnd
as ofthat date is repealed unless a later enacted statute, which Is enacted
beforeJan . uary 1, 1997, deletes or extends that date.
Article 2. Other Speed Laws
Minimum Speed Law
22400. (a) No person shall drive upon a highway at such a slow spee,l as
to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, unles.- the
reduced speed is necessary for safe operation, because of a grade, 01- in
compliance with law.
No person shall bring a vehicle to q complete stop upon a highway so n -, to
impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the
stop is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law.
(b) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines on the basis
of an engineering and traffic survey that slow speeds on any part of a st ate
highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of
traffic, the department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit
below which no person shall drive a vehicle, except when necessary for 5,afe
operation or in compliance with law, when appropriate signs giving n('t,ice
thereof are erected along the part of the highway for which a minimum si,-ed
limit is established.
Subdivision (b) of this section shall apply only to vehicles subject to
registration.
Amended Ch. 1304, Stats. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959.
Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Amended Ch. 364, Stats. 1979. Effective January 1, 1980.
Traffic Signals
22401. Local authorities in timing traffic signals may so regulate the,
timing thereof as to permit the movement of traffic in an orderly and -qfe,
manner at speeds slightly at variance from the speed otherwise applicable
under this code.
Bridges and Structures
22402. TheDepartmentofTransl)ortationmay,inthemannerprovi,i-@
in Section 22404 determine the maximum speed, not less than five milef I)ei-
hour, which can be maintained with -safety to any bridge, elevated stz-uct @ire,
tube, or tunnel on a state highwa.@-. Said department may also inal-- a
;62403 Div. 11
determination with reference to any other highway upon receiving a request
therefor from the board of supervisors or road commissioner of the county,
the governing body of the local authority having jurisdiction over the bridge,
elevated structure, tube, or tunnel.
Amended Ch. 645, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Local Bridges and Structures
22403. Any local authority may, in the manner provided in Section
22404, determine the maximum speed, not less than five miles per hour,
which can be maintained with safety to any bridge, elevated structure, tube,
or tunnel under its jurisdiction, or may request the Department of
Transportation to make such determination.
Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Revision of Speed Limit on Bridges and Structures
22404. The Department of Transportation or l@ authority making a
determination of the maximum safe speed upon a bridge, elevated structure,
tube, or tunnel shall first make an engineering investigation and shall hold
a public hearing.
Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be posted upon the
bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel at least five days before the date
fixed for the hearing. Upon the basis of the investigation and all evidence
presented at the hearing, the department or local authority shall determine
by order in writing the maximum speed which can be maintained with safety
to the bridge, elevated structure, tube or tunnel. Thereupon, the authority
having jurisdiction over the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel shall
erect and maintain suitable signs specifying the maximum speed so
determined at a distance of not more than 500 feet from each end of the
bridge, elevated structure, tube, tunnel, or any approach thereto.
Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. Effective January 1, 1975.
Violations on Bridges and Structures
22405. (a) No person shall drive a vehicle on any bridge, elevated
structure, tube, or tunnel constituting a part of a highway, at a speed which
is greater than the maximum speed which can be maintained with safety to
such structure.
ITT- (b) Upon the trial of any person charged with a violation of this section
with respect to a sign erected under Section 22404, proof of the
determination of the maximum speed by the Department of Transportation
or local authority and the erection and maintenance of the speed signs shall
constitute prima facie evidence of the maximum speed which can be
maintained with safety to the bridge, elevated structure, tube, or tunnel.
Amended Ch. 545, Stats. 1974. E(Tective January 1, 1975.
Maximum Speed for Designated Vehicles
22406. No person shall drive any of the following vehicles on a highway
at a speed in excess of 55 miles per hour:
(a) A motortruck or truck tractor having three or more axles or any
motortruck or truck tractor drawing any other vehicle.
(b)A passenger vehicle or bus drawing any other vehicle.
(c)A schoolbus transporting any school pupil.
(d)A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers.
(e)A vehicle transporting explosives.
(f)A trailer bus, as defined in Section 636.
Amended Ch. 2134, Statg. 1959. Effective September 18, 1959,
Amended Ch. 62, Stats. 1961. Effective September 15, 1961.
Amended Ch. 376, Stats. 1963. EfTective September 20, 196.1.
Div. 11 -655- 22413
Repealed and added Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Effective November 8, 1967.
Amended Ch. 676, Stata. 1980. Effective January 1, 1981.
Amended Ch. 843, Stata. 1988. EffL-ctive January 1, 1989.
Tank Vehicle Driver Penalties
22406.5.Any person who drives a tank vehicle subject to Division 14.7
(commencingwith Section 34000) while transporting more than 500 gallons
of flammableliquid at a speed greater than the applicable speed limit or in
willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is, in
addition to any other applicable penalty, subject to a fine of not less than five
hundred dollars ($500) for a first offense and, for a second or subsequent
offense within two years of a prior offense, to a fine of not less than two
thousand dollars ($2,000) and a suspension of up to six months of a
hazardous materials or cargo tank endorsement, or both.
Added Ch. 1043, Stata. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992.
Decreasing Truck Speed Limit
22407, Whenever the Department of Transportation or local authority
determines upon the basis of engineering studies and a traffic survey that
the speed of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles
mentioned in subdivision (a) of Section 22406 which have a manufacturer's
gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or more, in descending a grade
upon any portion of a highway, the department or local authority, with
respect to highways under their respective jurisdiction, may determine and
declare a speed limit of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25 or 20 miles per hour, whichever
is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is
reasonable and safe, which declared speed limit shall be effective for such
vehicles when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the
highway.
Amended Ch. 1210, Stats, 1965. Effective September 17, 1965. Supersedes Ch. 184.
Amended Ch. 78, Stats. 1967. Efrective November 8,1967.
Amended Ch. 82, St.ats. 1973. Effective January 1, 1974.
Solid Tire .
22409. No person shall operate any vehicle equipped with any solid tire
when such vehicle has a gross weight as set forth in the following table at any
speed in excess of the speed set forth opposite such gross weight:
When gross Maximum speed
weight of vehicle in miles
and load is: per hour:
10,000 lbs. or more but less than 16,000 lbs 25
16,000 lbs. or more but less than 22,000 lbs 15
22,000 lbs. or more 12
Metal Tires
22410. Nopersonshalloperateanyvehicleequippedwithanymetaltire
in contact with the surface of the highway at a speed in excess of six miles
per hour. -
Decreasing Speed Limit on Grades
22413. Whenever a local -authority determines upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour
is more than is reasonable and safe onqny portion of a street having a grade
in excess of 10 percent, the local authority may by ordinance determine and
declare a maximum limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most
appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared maximum speed shall
be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon
40611 -1076- Div. 17 Div. 17 -1077- 40802
(b)Pursuant to subdivision (a), a notice to correct violation shall be issued
; I Misdemeanor to Willfully Fail to Correct or Deliver Proof
as provided in this section or a notice to appear shall be issued as provided
in Section 40522, unless the officer finds any of the following: 40616. Any person willfu ly violating a written promise to correct or
(1) Evidence of fraud or persistent neglect. it Willfully failing to deliver proof of correction of violation is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Proof of c'
(2) The violation presents an immediate safety hazard. orrection may consist of a certification by an
(3) The violator do-es not agree to, or cannot, promptly correct the authorized representative of one of the following agencies that the alleged
violation. ' ! violation has been corrected:
(c) If any of the conditions set forth in subdivision (b) exist, the (a) Brake, lamp, smog device, or muffler violations may be certified as
y ny
procedures specified in this section or Section 40522 are inapplicable, and corrected b a station'licensed to inspect and certify for the violation
pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 9889.15) of Chapter 20.3 of
the officer may take other appropriate enforcement action.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (a), the notice to c Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and Section 27150.2.
orrect
(b) Driver license and registration violations may be certified as corrected
violation shall be on a form approved by the Judicial Council and, in addition
to the owner's or operator's address and identifying information, Shall by the Department of Motor Vehicles or by any clerk or deputy clerk of a
contain an estimate of the reasonable time required for correction and proof court.
of correction of the particular defect, not to exceed 30 days. (c) Any violation maybe certified as corrected by a police department, the
Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. @TEltiVe July 1, 1979. California Highway Patrol, sheriff, marshal, or other law enforcement
Amendcd Ch. 7 1, Stats. 1979. Effective May 19, 1979 by terms of an urgency clause. agency regularly engaged in enforcement of the Vehicle Code.
Amended Ch. 399, Stata. 1980. Effective July 11, 1980 by terms of an urgency clause. Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979.
Amended Ch. 402, Stats. 1982. Efrective January 1, 1983. Supersedes Ch. 466.
Anmnded Ch. 361, State. 1983. Effective January 1, 1984.
Amended Ch. 915, Stats. 1984. Effective July 1, 1985.
Amended Ch. 898, Stata. 1985. Effective January 1, 1986. Signed Notice as Complaint
Amended Ch. 729, Stats. 1989. Effective January 1, 19%.
Amended Ch. 90, Slats. 1991. Effective June 30, I()91 by means ofan urgency clause. 40618. Whenever proof of correction of violation is not received by the
Amended Ch. 258, Slats. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993. 1 issuing agency in accordance with Section 40610, the issuing agency may
deliver the signed promise to the court having jurisdiction of the violation
Proof of Correction of Violation: Tr-ansaction Fee with a certification that no proof of correction has been received. If prepared
40611. Upon proof of correction of an alleged violation of Section 12500
' I on a form approved by the Judicial Council, the promise under Section
or 12951, or any violation cited pursuant to Section 40610, the clerk shall 40610, together with the certification under this section, shall constitute a
collect a ten dollar ($10) transaction fee for each case. The fee shall be complaint to which the defendant may enter a plea, and upon which a
deposited by the clerk in accordance with Section 68084 of the Goverrunent warrant may be issued if the complaint is verified.
Code, and allocated monthly as follows:
Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979.
(a)Thirty-three percent shall be transferred to the local goverrunental
entity in whose jurisdiction the citation was issued for deposit in the general C 3. IL-LEGAL EVI]DENCE
fund of the entity.
(b) Thirty-four percent shall be transferred to the State Treasury for Article 1. Prosecutions Under Code
deposit in the State Penalty Fund established by Section 1464 of the Penal
Code. Vohkie and Uniform Used by Officers
(c) Thirty-three percent shall be deposited in the county general fund. 40800. Every traffic officer on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of
enforcing the provisions of Division 10 or 11 of this code shall wear a full
(d)No fee shall be imposed pursuant to this section if the violation
notice is processed only by the issuing agency and no record of the distinctive uniform, and if the officer while so on duty uses a motor vehicle,
action is transmitted to the cour-t. it must be painted a distinctive color specified by the commissioner.
Added Ch. 90, Stats. 1991. Effective June 30,1991 by means ofan urgency clause. This section does not apply to an officer assigned exclusively to the duty
Amended Ch. 189, Stats. 199 1, Effective July 29, 1991 by means of an urgency clause.
of investigating and securing evidence in reference to any theft of a vehicle
Amended Ch. 613, Stats. 1991. EffL-ctive January 1, 1992. or failure of a person to stop in the event of an accident or violation of Section
Amended Ch. 427, Stata. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993.
Amended Ch. 704, gtats. 1994. Effective January 1, 1995. 23169 or in reference td any felony charge, or to any officer engaged in
The 1994 amendment added the italicized material. serving any warrant when'the officer is not engaged in patrolling the
highways for the purpose of enforcing the traffic laws.
Copy of Notice
Amended Ch. 202, Stats. 196 1. Effective September 15, 196 1.
40612. An exact, legible copy of the notice to correct shall be delivered to
@i Speed Trap Prvhibftion
the alleged violator at the time he or she signs such notice.
Added Ch. 1350, Slats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979. 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in
arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any
Misdemeanor to Sign with False or Fictitious Name
alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing
40614. Any person who signs a notice to correct or a certificate of evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or
correction with a false or fictitious name is guilty of a misdemeanor. prosecution under this code.
Added Ch. 1350, Stats. 1978. Operative July 1, 1979.
Spood Trap
speed trap' is either of the following:
40803 -1078- Div. 17
(a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with
boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the
speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle
to travel the known distance.
(b) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit
provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of
subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22354,
22357,22358, or 22358.3, which speed limit is notjustified by an engineering
and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged
violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other
electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects. This
subdivision does not apply to local streets and roads.
For purposes of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the
latest functional usage and federal-aid system maps as submitted to the
Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been
submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road
primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the
following three conditions:
@1) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(2) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions
shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445.
(3) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
Amended Ch. 1346, Stats. 1972. Effective March 7, 1973.
Amended Ch. 203, Stats. 1973. Effective Jul. 9, 1973, by terms of an urgency clause.
Amended Ch. 1210, Stats. 1978. Effective January 1, 1979.
Repealed Ch. 1210, Stutz. 1978. Operative January 1, 1982.
Amended Ch. 357, Stats. 198 1. Effective January 1, 1982.
Repealed Ch. 357, Stats. 1981. Operative January 1, 1987.
Amended Ch. 833, StoLq. 1986. Effective January 1, 1987.
Amended Ch. 459, Stats. 199 1. Effective January 1, 1992.
Speed Trap Evidence
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall
be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution
under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the
evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a
speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of
a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic
devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall
establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony
presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in subdivision (b) of
Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering
survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged
violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road
as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie
case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap as defined
in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
Amended Ch. 357, Stats. 1981. Effective January 1, 1982.
Amended Ch. 459, Stats. 1991. Effective January 1, 1992.
Amended Ch. 638, Stats, 1992. Effective January 1, 1993.
Testimony Based on Speed Trap I Al
40804. (a) In any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving
the speed of a vehicle, any officer or other person shall be incompetent as a
Div. 17-1079- 40808
witness if the testimony is based upon or obtained from or by the
maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) Every officer arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, a
person so charged while on duty for the exclusive or main purpose of
enforcing the provisions of Divisions 10 and 11 is incompetent as a witness if
at the time of such arrest he was not wearing a distinctive uniform, or was
using a motor vehicle not painted the distinctive color specified by the
commissioner,
This section does not apply to an officer assigned exclusively to the duty
of investigating and securing evidence in reference to any theft of a vehicle
or failure of a person to stop in the event of an accident or violation of Section
23109 or in reference to any felony charge or to any officer engaged in serving
any warrant when the officer is not engaged in patrolling the highways for
the purpose of enforcing the traffic laws.
Amended Ch. 68, Stats. 1961. Effective September 15, 1961.
Amended Ch. 94, Stats. 1978. Effective January 1, 1979.
Admission of Speed Trap Evidence
40805. Everycourtshallbewithoutjurisdictiontorenderajudgrnentof
conviction against any person for a violation of this code involving the speed
of a vehicle if the court admits any evidence or testimony secured in violation
of, or which is inadmissible under this article.
Police Repoifs
40806. In the event a defendant charged with an offense under this code
pleads guilty, the trial court shall not at any time prior to pronouncing
sentence receive or consider any report, verbal or written, of any police or
traffic officer or witness of the offense without fully informing the defendant
of all statements in the report or statement of witnesses, or without giving
the defendant an opportunity to make answer thereto or to produce
witnesses in rebuttal, and for such purpose the court shall grant a
continuance before' pronouncing sentence if requested by the defendant.
Use of Evidence Regarding Departmental Action
40807. No record of any action taken by the department against a
person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle, nor any testimony regarding
the proceedings at, or concerning, or produced at, any hearing held in
connection with such action, shall be admissible as evidence in any court in
any criminal action.
No provision of this section shall in any way limit the admissibility of such
records or testimony as is necessary to enforce the provisions of this code
relating to operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license or when
the driving privilege is suspended or revoked, the admissibility of such
records or testimony in any prosecution for failure to disclose any matter at
such a hearing when required by law to do so, or the admissibility of such
records and testimony when introduced solely for the purpose of impeaching
the credibility of a witness.
Added Ch. 804, Stats. 1977. Effective January 1, 1978.
Speed Trap Evidence
40808. Subdivision (d) of Section 28 of Article I of the California
Constitution shall not be construed as abrogating the evidentiary provisions
of this article.
Added Ch. 538, Stats. 1992. Effective January 1, 1993.
,KPPEINDI)C
44D99
CITY OF TEMECULA
POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR MODIFICATION
OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS
Traffic flow modifications covered by this policy include all "official traffic control devices"
authorized by the California Vehicle Code. Some of the methods authorized in particular
circumstances might include traffic islands, curbs, traffic barriers, or other roadway desicn
ID
features, removing or relocation traffic signals and one-way traffic flow.
CRITERIA
A petition request for the closure or modification of traffic flow on public streets, including re::
opening previously closed streets, will be considered by the City for those streets meetinc, all
of the following criteria:
a.The street must be classified as a "local street" based on the City's Circulation
Element of the General Plan.
b.The street should be primarily residential in nature.
C.Traffic vo.'itmos on the street must equal or exceed 2,000 vehicles per day for a
complete closure. Volumes for a partial closure must equal or exceed 1,000 vehicles
per day.
d.Public Safety Agencies have not provided sufficient evidence of any major public
safety concerns regarding the proposed street closure or traffic flow modification.
e.An engineering safety study has determined that the proposed closure or traffic flow
c'
modifications will not create unreasonable traffic on the subject street or on streets
which may be impacted by diverted traffic.
f.The changes in traffic flow will not result in unreasonable liability exposure for the
City.
All persons signing a petition requesting a street closure or traffic flow modification
acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in all costs
directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order to
facilitate the funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street
closure or traffic flow modifications.
h. The requested action is authorized by legislative authority in State law.
PETITION REQUIREMENTS
The following procedures must be followed for submitting a petition to the City:
r:\traffic\policy\stclogtire- I 1/95/nip
a.The City Traffic Encineer will examine the technical feasibility and anticipated
impacts of the proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications. This review will
include, but will not be limited to, items such as State law, the Circulation Element
of the City's General Plan, the type of road or street involved, compliance with
engineering regulations, existing traffic conditions, projected traffic conditions, the
potential for traffic diversion to adjacent streets, the increased liability exposure for
the City or conflicts with future planned improvements.
b.The City Traffic Engineer will determine the boundary of the "affected area" to be
petitioned. The affected area will include those properties where normal travel routes
are altered by the street closure or traffic flow modifications, and/or properties which
are si-nificantly impacted by traffic that is to be diverted.
C>
C.The petition requesting the street closure or traffic flow modifications must be
supported by a minimum of 75 percent of the total number of properties within the
fe affected area." Persons submitting petitions must attempt to contact all property
owners within the affected area to determine their views on the proposed street closure
or modifications in traffic flow. The City will not accept a petition unless the
petitioner offers confirmation in a form satisfactory to the City Traffic Encineer that
at least 85 percent of the property owners in the affected area have been contacted and
have either signed the petition in support of the street closure or traffic flow
modification or have signed a document indicating, non-support for the street closure
or traffic flow modificatic,,i.
d.At a minimum, petitions submitted to the City for review must include the following:
0A statement that all persons signing the petition acknowledge it is the City's
policy that they will need to participate in all costs directly associated with the
street closure or traffic flow modifications in order to facilitate the fundin- of the
ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow
modifications.
0A drawing showing the exact location of the proposed street closure or traffic
flow modifications and the boundary of the "affected area" must be provided.
The drawing must include changes in traffic patterns anticipated as result of the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
0The petition langua-e must also clearly explain the location and nature of the
b
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications.
0The petition languace and attached drawing must be reviewed and approved by
rD
the City Traffic Engineer prior to circulation to ensure its accuracy and ability to
be clearly understood.
*A specific reference to the Vehicle Code section authorizin- such street closure
or traffic flow modifications must be provided.
A sample petition has been provided as an attachment to this policy.
.2- r:\tmfFjc\policy\stclosure- I 1/95/ajp
PETITION REVIEW PROCESS
The following process will be used to review all petitions associated with a proposed street
closure or traffic flow modifications:
a.The City Traffic Engineer will review any petition to verify compliance with all
petition requirements set forth above, including whether the request in the petition is
authorized by State law. Any petition not complying with these requirements will not
be accepted for consideration.
b.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, the proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications will be referred to all affected public
agencies in conjunction with the environmental review process. When applicable,
these agencies will include all City Departments, the local office of the California
Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and Fire Departments, all affected local utility
companies, Temecula Valley Unified School District, Riverside Transit A-ency, the
local office of California Department of Transportation and any other a-encies
tn
affected by the requested closure or traffic flow modification.
C.If the petition contains all of the required information under this policy, where the
street closure or traffic flow modifications on a street or system of streets may be
accomplished by several different methods, a public workshop will be held to which
all petitioners, affected property owners, and long-term tenants such as mobile home
park residents will be invited to participate after the petition requesting the traffic flow
modifications or street closure has been received and verified by the City. The
purpose of the workshop will be to attempt to determine the method that has the
greatest community support.
CITY ACTION ON STREET CLOSURE OR TRAFFIC FLOW MODFFICATION
REOUESTS
Once a petition contains all of the required information and all of the matters described above
under "Petition Review Process" have been completed, the City Traffic Engineer will prepare
a report with recommendations and initiate and complete the environmental review process for
the project. Project alternatives to the extent required will be defined for a temporary or
permanent street closure or traffic flow modifications. The City of Temecula, Public/Traffic
Safety Commission will review the street closure or traffic flow modifications request, any
environmental review document prepared for the project, all public agency referral responses
received during the environmental review process, and the results of the technical staff review.
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission may support or recommend acainst the
street closure or traffic flow modifications. If the Public/Traffic Safety Commission denies the
proposed street closure or traffic flow modifications, that action will be final unless within ten
days from the date of the City Traffic Engineer's notification of the Commission's decision to
all property owners within the affected area, a property owner within the affected area appeals
the Commission's decision to the City Council. In order to appeal the decision, the property
owner shall file a written notice of appeal with the Department of Public Works. The appeal
will be heard in accordance with the Appeal Process listed below. If the request is
recommended for further consideration, after public notice is given, the City Council may, after
-3- r:\Lraffic@policy\sLclosure- I 1/95/ajp
making any necessary findings, establish a temporary or permanent period of street closure or
traffic flow modifications.
When the City Council considers a recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
or an appeal of a decision of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to a proposed
street closure or traffic flow modifications, it will follow the process outlined below:
a.A letter explaining the street closure or traffic flow modifications and the time and
place when the matter will be heard by the City Council will be sent to all property
owners, within the affected area prior to its installation.
b.All approaches to the proposed closure or modification will be posted notifying
motorists of upcoming Public Hearing.
C.A Public Hearing will be set before the City Council and public notice will be C'iven
at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing by letter to property owners in the affected
area and by posting of signs on the affected roadways as described in this Section and
by a notice published in the newspaper.
d.Public notification of the City Council action will be given in cases when a street
closure or traffic modifications is approved by the City Council, and signs C'iving
notice of the street closure or traffic flow modifications will also be erected at least
two weeks prior to the date of implementation of the street closure or traffic
modifications.
e.In the event the action involves a highway not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the
City of Temecula, the City will obtain the proper approvals from the California
Transportation Commission pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21 101 or
21 100 (d) prior to implementation of the street closure or traffic flow modification.
f.A letter explaining, the final City Council decision will be sent by the City to all
in
property owners, within the affected area.
The City Council has the sole discretion, subject to all applicable laws, to approve, modify,
continue or deny any street closure or traffic flow modifications request regardless of any
support or lack thereof via the petition process. Any action by the City Council to approve or
deny a street closure or traffic flow modifications request will be by adoption of a formal
resolution.
r:'@traffic\policy\sLclosure- I1195/ajp
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PETITION TO CLOSE OR MODIFY THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON STREET
BETWEEN AND
BY THE INSTALLATION OF (Nature of Chan2es)
AT (Location)
DATE:
BEFORE YOU SIGN THIS PETITION, UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING! IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT YOU FIRST READ THE CITY'S POLICY FOR CLOSURE OR
MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON PUBLIC STREETS.
We, the undersigned resident of the area shown on the attached map do/do not petition the City of
Temecula to on Street as
shown on the attached drawing.
All persons signing this petition acknowledge it is the City's policy that they will need to participate in
all costs directly associated with the street closure or traffic flow modification in order tc, Facilitate the
funding of the ultimate improvements needed to implement the street closure or traffic flow modification.
The specific California Vehicle Code section(s) authorizing such closure or traffic flow modifications
states:
All persons signing this petition do hereby certify that they reside within the area impacted bv the
proposed traffic flow change as shown on the attached map.
Our designated contact person is: Phone:
Signature Print Name Print Address
r:\trELffic\policy\wiosure- I 1/95/ajp
APPENDIX "A"
RULES AND REGULATIONS: SUBJECT MATTER
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21 100. Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution recardina the
following matters:
a.Regulating or prohibiting processions or assemblages on the hiahways.
0
h.Licensing and regulating the operation of vehicles for hire and drivers of passen(,er vehicles
for hire.
C.Regulating traffic by means of traffic officers.
d.Regulating traffic by means of official traffic control devices meeting the requirements of
Section 21400.
e.Regulatinc, traffic by means of any person given temporary or permanent appointment for such
0
duty by the local authority whenever official traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise
inoperable, at the s.-@nes of accidents or disasters, or at such locations as may require traffic
direction for orderly traffic flow.
No person shall, however, be appointed pursuant to this subdivision unless and until the local
authority has submitted to the commissioneror to the chief law enforcementofficer exercisingjurisdiction
in the enforcement of traffic laws within the area in which such person is to perform such duty, for
review, a proposed program of instruction for the training of a person for such duty, and unless and until
the commissioner or such other c@ief law enforcement officer approves the proposed prooram. The
commissioner or such other chief law enforcement officer shall approve such a proposed program if he
reasonably determines that the program will provide sufficient training for persons assi-ned to perform
el
the duty described in this subdivision.
f.Regulating traffic at the site of road or street construction or maintenance by persons
authorized for such duty by the local authority.
g.Licensing and regulating the operation of tow truck service or tow truck drivers whose
principal place of business or employment is within the jurisdiction of the local authority,
excepting the operation and operator of any auto dismantler's tow vehicle licensed under
Section 1 1505 or any tow truck operated by a repossessing a-ency I icensed under Chapter I I
(commencing with Section 7500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code and its
registered employees. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the authority of a city or city and
county pursuant to Section 121 1 1.
h.Operation of bicycles, and, as specified in Section 21114.5, electric carts by physically
disabled persons, or persons 50 years of age or older, on the public sidewalks.
i.Providin- for the appointment of nonstudent school crossin- guards for the protection of
persons who are crossing a street or highway in the vicinity of a school or while returning
thereafter to a place of safety.
-6- r:\Lraffic\policy\stclomure-1 1!95/ajp
j.Regulating the methods of deposit of garbage and refuse in streets and highways for collection
by the local authority or by any person authorized by the local authority.
k.Regulating cruising. The ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision shall
regulated cruising, which shall be defined as the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a
traffic control point, in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as
determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified
time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that
further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution. No
person is in violation of an ordinance or resolution adopted pursuant to this subdivision unless
(1) that person has been -iven the written notice on a previous driving trip past the control
point and then a-ain passes the control point in that same time interval and (2) the beginning
and end of the portion of the street subject to cruising controls are clearly identified by sicns
that briefly and clearly state the appropriate provisions of this subdivision and the local
ordinance or resolution on cruising.
1.Regulating or authorizing the removal by peace officers of vehicles unlawfully parked in a fire
lane, as described in Section 22500. 1, on private property. Any removal pursuant to this
subdivision shall be consistent to the extent possible with the procedures for removal and
storage set forth in Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 22650).
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES: UNIFORM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21 100. I Whenever any city or county, by ordinance or resolution, permits, restricts, or prohibits
the use of public or private highways pursuant to this article, any traffic control device erected by it on
or after January 1, 1981, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications adopted by the
Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 21400.
REGULATION OF HIGHWAYS
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21101. Local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and
regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters:
a.Closing any highway to vehicular traffic when, in the opinion of the legislative body having
jurisdiction, the highway is no longer needed for vehicular traffic.
b.Designatinc, any highway as a through highway and requirin- that all vehicles observe official
C, :D
traffic control devices before entering or crossing the hi-hway or desicnatin- any intersection
el C, t)
as a stop intersection and requiring all vehicles to stop at one or more entrances to the
intersection.
C.Prohibiting the use of particular highways by certain vehicles, except as otherwise provided
by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 103 1) of
Chapter 5 of Part I of Division I of Public Utilities Code. No ordinance which is adopted
pursuant to this subdivision after November 10, 1969, shall apply to any state highway which
is included in the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, except an ordinance
which has been approved by the California Transportation Commission by a four-fifths vote.
-7- r:\truff'iclf>olicy\stclosure- I 1/95/ujp
d.Closing particular streets during regular school hours for the purpose of conductin-
C,
automobile driver training programs in the secondary schools and colleges of this state.
e.Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and
other purposes when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing.
f.Prohibiting entry to, or exit from, or both, from any street by means of islands, curbs, traffic
barriers, or other roadwa design features to implement the circulation element of a ceneral
y
plan adopted pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 65350) of Chapter 3 of Division
I of Title 7 of the Government Code. The rules and regulations authorized by this
subdivision shall be consistent with the responsibility of local government to provide for the
health and safety of its citizens.
LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE HIGHWAY: CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
VEHICLE CODE SECTION
21101.4(a) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt rules and regulations for
Z>
temporarily closing to throu-h traffic a highway under its jurisdiction when all of the following conditions
t,
are, after a public hearing, found to exist.
ZD
1.'ne local authority finds and determines that there is serious and continual criminal activity
in the por@@on of the highway recommended for temporary closure. This findin- and
determination shall be based upon the recommendation of the police department or, in the case
of a highway in an unincorporated area, on the joint recommendation of the sheriffs
department and the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
2.The hichway has not been designated as a throu-h hichwdy or arterial street.
3.Vehicular or pedestrian traffic on the highway contributes to the criminal activity.
4.The closure will not substantially adversely affect the operation of emer-ency vehicles, the
ID
performance of municipal or public utility services, or the delivery of frei-ht by commercial
4D
vehicles in the area of the hi-hway proposed to be temporarily closed.
(b)A highway may be temporarily closed pursuant to subdivision (a) for not more than 18 months,
except that period may, pursuant to subdivision (a), be extended for one additional period of not
more than 18 months.
r:\Lmffic@policy@tclosure-1 1/95/ajp
,NPPE DI)C
66E'9
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Service Order Request
DATE: June 16, 1993 TIME: 12:00 p.m.
TO: MARTY LAUBER RECORDED BY: Dolores Villa
CALLER: George Cullen PHONE: 676-1435
42741 Agena Street
REQUESTINGCALL BACK:Circle One: No
ADDRESS OFDIFFICULTY: intersection of Agena and Southern Cross
LOCATION OFDIFFICULTY: Agena and S(,uthern Cross
3ESCRIPTION:Citizen requests a double Stop Sign - many people are speeding and not stopping!!
Warning "Stop ahead" - Very dangerous intersection A.S.A.P.
SERVICE COMPLETED BY:
COMPLETION DATE:
NOTES:
pwOl\forms\admin\service.req 041993
TELEPHONE MESSAGE
TO:Karel Lindemans
cc:Ron Bradley
Chief Lebahn
Joe Kicak
FROM:Tony Beradino
676-0717
DATE:March 20, 1995
SUBJ: Speeding on Southern Cross
There was a terrible accident Friday night. Apparently kids were drinking and hit a fire
hydrant. Both cars were totalled.
Is there anything you can do to stop the high school kids from speeding on Southern
Cross? It is a very dangerous situation. In addition to speeding, the kids make rolling
stops at the stop sign. The Satellite Ridge Homeowners Association is going to be
discussing this and may get a petition together.
His suggestion is to paint STOP in white letters on the street and to ask the Police
Department to patrol the area more often.
Sue Steffen
cc: J. Kicak
Play 25, 1995
Temecula Valley Unifi-ed School District
31350 Rancho Vista Rd.
Temecula, CA 92592
Dear Patricia B. Novotney, Ed D.
As a parent of children attending Vail Elementary School, I am
writing this letter to bring to your and the School Board's
if it has not been addressed in the past, the NEED
for sidewalks along Sana'-a Cecila, another major road leading to
and from Vail Elementary School. I am concerned for my children's
safety, as well as the other children who walk to and from school
each day. Because of my concern, I walk children each day--it is
one less vehicle traveling on Santa Cecila during the release of
children from school. A speed limit sign is not posted along
Santa Cecila, nor a sign indicating "school zone, children present."
Would it be appropriate t-.o have these posted?
Many, many cars line SarLta Cecila as well as Mira Loma each
afternoon; cars face North, South, East and West waiting to pick
children up from Vail Elementary School. At this time, children
are walking home on Santa Cecila .... on front lawns to avoid the
cars. I have seen children playing around, pushing one another,
landing in the street in front of cars. They walk in groups,
side by side walking between the parked cars--a dangerous and
serious situation for ALL concerned. Children have darted into
'the street to get to the other side of Santa Cecila where the
caren-@ waits. The NEED for sidewalks on Santa Cecila dose exist
for the children who 1--v@- -In the '!'-a Vista He@gh-s and Starl'-gh'
Ridce area.
--ece@-- newspaper a--@4,c'-2 featured in the Press Enterprise on
Wednesday, !,lay 24, 1995 s--a-Les: "The Temecula City Council has
aodroved plans to build sidewalks along a portion of Mira Loma
@r. ana Rancho Vista Rd. The sidewalks will be built along the
cor@Li-on of P@,4-ra Loma Dr. WEST of Vail Elementary School and will
cost about $34,600.11 Was 3anta Cec4-la mentioned i-n this approval
Plan?
Santa Mira Loma a:id Rancho Vista Roads are all ma,@o-
i-ou-@es to and -from Va@-1- ---J'.ementarv School, used by cars arci
children. SA-7ETY on SantEL Cecila needs -Lo be addressed to the
croder Personnel and revie!wed by them.
i, have enclosed pictures with notes on the back of each picture
i'or you to see the situation on Santa Cecila, and DO STRONGLY
z.uggest you and or the School Board members, traffic division
%-isit Santa Cecila at 3:07 PM sometime soon.
Sincerely,
C'oncerned Parent
Sandra J. Leonard
30214 Caprice Ct.
aemecula, CA
909-699-9104
cc:City of Temecula, City Council, etal
City Manager,.City of Temecula
Vail Elementary School, PTA President
Vail Elementary School, Patricia L. Yavno
Starlight Ridge Homeowners Association
Alta Vista Heights Homeowners Association
MEMORANDUM
TO:Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineering
FROM:Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:June 5, 1995
SUBJECT:Student Safety on Santa Cecilia Drive
This memo has been prepared in response to the letter received from Sandra J. Leonard dated
May 22, 1995. Her letter is attached and centers on pedestrian safety adjacent to Vail
Elementary School.
The first and most prominent concern raised was the need for sidewalks along Santa Cecilia
Drive. The Department of Public Works has just completed our application for SB821 funding
for a five (5) foot wide sidewalk along the entire length of Santa Cecilia Drive. The Traffic
Division has worked with Temecula Valley Unified School District to create the suggested
route to school for Vail Elementary and we identified the need for a safe pedestrian link
through this neighborhood. Our application is attached for your review and to provide greater
detail if needed.
The second concern was for the posting of the speed limit on Santa Cecilia Drive. The policy
of the Traffic Division has been to only post residential prima facie 25 MPH zones if the Police
Department or a traffic engineering survey identifies a particularly high number of violations.
It is also not recommended to post the installation "C" - School, Speed Limit 25 MPF4, When
Children Are Present sign, because the speed limit is always 25 MPH. The public may think
the speed limit is higher when there are no children present.
In an effort to increase pedestrian safety, staff recommends placing a W63 - advance school
symbol sign with a W65 - school plate on Santa Cecilia just west of Escolacata Drive for
westbound traffic approaching the school grounds (examples attached). A school legend
should be placed at the same location.
The final issue discussed was the approval of plans for installing sidewalks on Mira Loma Drive
and Rancho Vista Road. In the 1990-1991 SB821 funding cycle the City of Temecula
received funding for the construction of sidewalk on both Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma
Drive adjacent to Vail Elementary School. This sidewalk has been completed. In the 1 994-
1 995 cycle we also received funding for sidewalk on both streets which will fully encircle the
school grounds. City Council has approved staff to go out to bid on this project with
completion forecasted for around August 1, 1995. Based on the limited funds available
through SBS21, Santa Cecilia was not included in any previous proposals.
r: \Iauber\9 5\mem\kicak.a, 605/aip
FY 1995-96
PROD-ECT INFORMATION
(SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Only)
1.AGENCY: -City of Temcula
2. PROJECT NAME: Sidewalk Project - Santa Cecilia Drive
3. CONTACT PERSON: Mart-y Lauber, Traffic Engineer
4. PHON-T NUM13ER: (909) 694-6411
S.PROJECT BUDGET:
R-
TDA ARTICLE 3 (SB 821) $29,317
C=R LCCAL F=S $7,330
TOTAL $36,647
EXPENSES:
CONSTRUCTION $32,647
ENGINEERING/ADMIN. $3,000
CLEARING AND GRUBBING $1,000
RIC-HT-OF-WAY $
C=R (Specify) $
TOTA-L $36,647
6. ESTIMATED STARTING DATE (MONTH/YR.): 11/95
7.- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE-(MONTH/YR.) 1/96
RCTC: 4/9,=
CITY OF TEMECULA
SB 821 PROJECT APPLICATION
MAY 1995
PROJECT:Sidewalk Project - North Side of Santa Cecilia Drive from Mira Loma
Drive to Cosmic Drive
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:This project will provide pedestrians with a five-foot sidewalk and
eight pedestrian ramps behind existing curb and gutter. Santa Cecilia
Street is in a residential area near an elementary school. This route is
on the elementary school's 'Suggested Route to School' map.
Currently, neighborhood children walk in the street while traveling to
and from school. Completion of this sidewalk project will enhance
pedestrian safety by moving children out of the busy street. This
safety enhancement will also encourage parents to allow their children
to walk to school, thus decreasing automobile traffic in the area.
The design of this project meets ADA requirements and does not
.meander.' This project would be completed in a timely manner as
minimum grading is required.
PROJECT LIMITS
GO
ot4DA
FL
PO
CITY OF TEMECULA
DCL
C'T
PROPOSED SB 821
SIDEWALK PROJECT
FY 1995-96
SANTA CECILIA DRIVE
DATE:May 31, 1995
-@30 SIGNS Traffic Manual
11-1982
POLICY
ADVANCE SCHOOL SYMBOL SIGN
W63The Advance School symbol sign (W63) may be used
in advance of remote school crosswalks outside of the
school zone. On streets with prima facie 25 MPH speed
limit that are contiguous to a school building or school
grounds, it is combined with a SCHOOL plate (W65) to
form an Installation A, used to inform drivers that are
entering a school zone. See Chapter 10 "School Area
Standard 3611Pedestrian Safety" for further information and examples
of application.
W64
(s3-1) SCHOOL BUS STOP FT. SIGN
The SCHOOL BUS STOP FT Sign (W64) may
be used to give advance notice of approved school bus
stops where clear sight distance is less than 200 feet.
(See CVC 22504.)
Standard 30"
SCHOOL PLATE
The SCHOOL plate (W65) is not used alone. On streets
with prima facie 25 MPH speed limit, it is combined
W65 (S4-3) with W63 to form an Installation A. On streets with higher
speed limits, it is combined with R2 (25) and R71 or
R72 to form an Installation C, used to inform drivers they
Standard 24" x 811 are entering a school zone with a 25 MPH speed limit at
certain times. See Chapter 1 0, "School Area Pedestrian
Safety" for further information and examples of
application.
W66
(S2-1) SC-HOOL CROSSING SYMBOL SIGN
The School Crossing symbol sign (W66) is combined
with the SCHOOL XING plate (W66A) to form an instal-
lation B, which may be used at marked school crosswalks
Standard 36" on the "Suggested Route to School". It shall not be
used where the crossing is controlled by yield sign,
stop sign or traffic signal. See Chapter 1 0, "School Area
Pedestrian Safety" for further information and examples
of application.
W66A The W66 and W66A should usually be posted at the
Standard 24" x la" crosswalk, but may be posted up to 50 feet in advance.
AGENDA REPORT
(ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND NOTES)
TO:Public/Traffic Safety Commission
F'ROM:Ken Brucianan / Homeowner
42244 Cosmic Dr.
Temecula, CA 92592
(909) 699-6590
DATE:June 22, 1995
SUBJECT-.item 2
Stop Controls on Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive
ADDMONAL BACKGROLTND:
T'he purpose of this report is to provide additional information on the traffic problems that continue
to occur in the Starlight Ridge area, or more specifically, on the Mira Loma-Santa Cecilia-Cosmic
Drive 'speedway'. These neighborhood streets are beinc, used as a short-cut by two groups of
drivers:
1.) Teachers, School Administrators, and Parents of Students at Vail Elementarv School (who live
in anv area north of the school) as thev go to nd from the school.
Vail Elementarv School is a year-around school and there are no sidewalks so this trafec is mixin-
with elemenm7 school children walking in the street to and from Vail Elementarv School.
2.)Residents of the. Ar)artments, )ur)lexes, and Houses surrounding Nura Loma Dr. and Area south
of Rancho Vista Drive as thev zo to and from Rancho California Rd.
Amon2 this second group is a substantial number of young, aggressive males who have no regard for
the children in 'the area. They Eke to chase each other through these streets and often appear to
be under the influence of drucs or alcohol (see attached Pr= Enterprise article dated 6/22/94).
Amon- the known incidents that have taken place in the last 3 years are as follows:
1.)Drun c driv -r smashes into 4 cars on Santa Cefilia Dr.. 12ushing one of them into homeowner's
-zara@e. Homeowners have seen the man drive bv their house repeatedly since then, staring at
them as he -oes by. (Earlv 1995)
2.)Do!z run ove
(Summer 1994)
n Cosmic Dr. between Santa Cecilia and Rancho ifornia Dr.
3.)Assault @th a deadiv weapon at intersection of Santa Cecilia and Cosmic Drive. Two drivers get
into altercation, one driver attacks other with knife. (Summer 1994)
(cont.)
pa-c 2
z
Public@TrafFic Saferv Commission
4.)Shootin!z incident occurs durin!z Rarrv on Mira Loma Dr. bv Vail Elementarv school (see attached
article). Cars chase each other with additional shots fired at intersection of Rancho California
Rd. and Ynez. Police raid home, find drugs, guns, ammo; male juvenile arrested on outstanding
warrant. (June '7'7, 1994)
ri
D 'ver on Santa Cecilia hits bicyclist head-on as bicyclist is turniniz left onto Santa Cecilia from
AL,ena St. Bicyclist spends two weeks in hospital. (Sprinc, 1993)
6.)Drunk driver driving down Santa Cecilia misses corner at Cosmic Dr. and smashes into rrel- at
4"@8 Cosmic Dr. (Summer 1992)
7.)Manv other near-traizedies that have gone unreported.
A traffic. study was conducted approximately one year ago (see attached letter from Hasib @a
dated August 17, 1994, along with speed data for 6/22/94). The city has installed '25 NPH" speed
limit sips (in front of my house). There has also been selective monitoring (using a radar trailer)
and occasional radar enforcement (by motorcycle police officer).
However, the volume and speed of the traffic continues to be a problem for manv homeowners in
Starli2ht Ridce, particularly alone, Cosn3ic Dr. and Santa Cecilia. Once @zain, these are
neighborhood streets with lots of kids wafldng on the streets to and from the @ail Elementarv
School. These streets arc being used, in large part, by people from outside the neighborhood, as a
short-cut.
Efforts to date, while beneficw, have done little to reduce the speed, or particularly
, 7 the volume of
traf5c on these streets. Anv efforts by Traffic Safety Commission to provide a long-term solution
to this problem would be greatly appreciated.
One possible lonc,-term solution might be to extend Moraga Rd. through to @a Loma Dr. Another
ID
miahr be to install physical barriers to prevent traffic from using this Mir' Loma-Santa Cecilia-
a
Cosmic Dr. short-cut.
Attachments:Copy of Press Enterprise Article dated 6@4
Hasib Baha Letter dated 8/17/94 (inc. speed data for Cosmic Dr. on 6/22/94)
Two arrest'ed after shots
-fired at Temecula party
he Bed. other peopiecliased him,
TEMECULA on-o7
Two people were arrested after ads.
shots were And at a party and elude
one of the paz-ty-goers was then led
chased through the city.
No one was injured. Police offi got a search war-
The incident began Monday Drive
night after several people began to a
fight during the p@ on the 29000 with
block Of Mira Lo@ Driv . One
person @ uni-
police, Frank Chukes. 22. of Costa
@esa allegedly ftr@a handgun, the
hitting the departing person's car
once in a fender.
arrested on suspi-
Police did not release the name on Of assault with a deadly weap-
of the person who was shot aL As OIL
cit mecula
iness Park C)rive Ternec:ula. California 92590 (909) 694-198@ FAX 1909,
August 17, 1994
Mr. and Mrs. Bruckman
42244 Cosmic Drive
Temecula, California 92592
Dear @. and Mrs. Bruckman:
'Ibis letter is a follow up to our letter dated July 1, 1994 and a response to your letter dated June 22,
1994. In. your letter you showed concerns about speeding motorists on Cosmic Drive near Santa
Cecilia Drive, making left turns from Cosmic Drive into westbound Rancho California Road, and
establishing sidewalks on Santa Cecilia Drive.
As promised, I have installed two spee&volume counters to study the speed profile of vehicles
travelling on Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive. These counters have -recorded speeds from June
22, 1994 to June, 27, 1994. One counter was @led about 400 feet west of Cosmic Drive on Santa
Cecilia and the other counter was approximately 400 feet north of Santa Cecilia Drive on Cosmic
Drive. Speeds recorded on Cosmic Drive were significantly higher. The data from both counters is
attached for your review.
ANALYZING DATA:
Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive are residential streets.
According to California Vehicle Code (22352 b.1) residential streets have a
prima facie speed limit of 25mph.
'rbe data on Cosmic Drive shows an unusually high number of vehicles travelling in
excess of 30 miles per hour. (See attached data)
An All-Way 'Stop' sign is not warranted at this intersection based on the average
daily traffic (volume). Please see the artached Caltrans Warrants for an All-Way Stop
sign installation.
As part of our signal priority listing we will be r-Anking the intersection of Rancho
California road and Cosmic Drive.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the obtained data and field investigations, we feel that installation of '25 M?H' speed limit
signs at Cosmic Drive along with selective Police enforcement could reduce speedinc, viol ations at this
intersection. In addition, The City of Temecula is currently developing a Neighborhood Traffic
Awareness ProcIram to educate motorists as to their speed on public streets. We are in the process of
obtainin- a radar-trailer which will inform the drivers of their velocity by displaying the exact speed
when approaching the radar trailer. The posted speed limit is shown just above the vehicle speed for
r. %bwmNicacr@co"nLa. ILriajp
comparison. We will be glad to put your name on our radar-trailer study list if you would like to
volunteer to monitor speed limit compliance. We believe the installation of a radar-trailer could help
reduce the speed of the motorists on Cosmic Drive.
Thank you again and if you have any questions or comments concernin- this matter, please contact
me at 694-6411.
Sincerely,
Traffic Technician
Attachment:Existing Speed Data Sheets
All-Way Stop Control Policy
cc:Tim D. Serlet, Dire=r of Public Works/City Engineer
Sgt. Domenoe, Temecula Police Dep:irrment
Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
SITE CODE : 00000000 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE: 1
STREET FILE: cosmicsc
'@IM!TS
COUNTZ-R t : DATE:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tlt SPEED RANGES (MPH)
a= GN 0-15 16-20 21-?-5 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 56-60 61-65 7D-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 c 0 40
iR TC)TA 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:OC PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
3:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 48
3:30 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 c 0 0 0 40
3.-45 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
IF T---A 0 0 - 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0
@:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 53
4:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43
4-30 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 (0 0 0 0 46
4:45 7 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 38
3 6 2 3 0 0
5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
5:15 5 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4,0
):30 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
3:45 5 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 39
HP TOT 0 0 0 2 2 4 4 1 (0 0 0 0 0 (a)
2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ;& 0 0 0 48
4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TO=-,AL 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 (a
@:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
@:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 50
TOT@, 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
E:CO PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
i5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 53
FP TOTAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 43
-,.Oo PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 58
9:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3C 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
.5 2 0 a 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
HR TOTAL 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 40
)o pH 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43
SITE CODE 00000000 CITY OF TENECLJLA PAGE: 2
STREET cosmic Drive FILE: COSMICS:
LIMITS 5001 north of Santa CeciLia Dr
CotiNTER 9 2 DATE: 6/22/94
----------------------------------- -------------------------
7@ -------------------------------------------------
TIME TOTAL SPEED RANGES (MPH)
BEGIN COUNTED 0-15 16-20 21 @5 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 70-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10:30 2 0 0 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RR TOTAL 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0
11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0
HR TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
64 2 10 17 17 6 a 3 1
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
Prior to the construction of speed undulations, the subject street section shall meet the
following criteria:
1.A "Speed Undulation Petition' signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the
affected property owners shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public
Works, Traffic Engineering Division.
2.The average daily traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-f our
(24)hour period.
3.The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State
law.
4.At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five
(25)mph speed limit.
5.The subject street:
a.Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
b.Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
C.Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where
undulations are to be constructed.
d.Shall be at least one quarter (Y4) mile in length.
e.Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
9-Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
h.Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City
Engineer.
6.The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet, unless
approved by the City Engineer.
7.Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous
street or on a relatively short (< 800') cul-de--sac.
8.Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawing.
9.Location of undulations shall be discussed with the School District and Fire Department
and report back to Commission.
10.Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alterations
or removal of any undulation may occur at any time.
pwO@traffic@undulatn@pdund.pot
Speed Undulation Policy
Page 2
Changing the location of undulations on a street, or the removal of undulations, may be
considered when all the findings listed below are made by the Commission:
Relocation of Undulations
1 Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
2.Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3.There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the
community.
4.There is a petition signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the affected property
owners in favor of relocation.
Remova I of Undulations
1 . Undulations are ineffective in reducing speeds and volumes of vehicles.
2.Undulations were placed in a location conflicting with adopted guidelines.
3.There is evidence that the original location is no longer in the best interest of the
community.
4.There is a petition signed by at least sixty-five percent (65%) of the affected property
owners in favor of removal.
5. Undulations have been installed for at least two (2) years.
Removal of undulations which have been installed for less than two years will only be
consi 'dered if the City is compensated by those requesting removal for the full cost of the
original installation, including design, construction and inspection.
The original installation and maintenance of the undulations will be financed as all other signs,
striping and pavement features.
pwOS\traffic@undulatn@spdund.pol
STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
c/o Ralston Management
27919 Front Street, Suite 203
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 676-9299
July 20, 1995 RECF'IVF---"-."--
JUL 2 4 1,99-;
Mr. Marty Lauber
City of Temecula
Traffic Engineer
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Re: Starlight Ridge Community
Dear Mr. Lauber:
The Board of Directors of Starlight Ridge has recently learned that
sidewalks are being planned in our community (Cosmic/Santa
Cecilia).As President of Starlight Ridge, I would like the
opportunityto provide input during the planning stage as this
affects someof our homeowners and our community in general.
Please let me know if this is possible or how we can help.
Sincerely,
Wayne Hall, President
Starlight Ridge Association
WH:lr
Cc-:
Dov4
STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
c/o Ralston Management
27919 Front Street, Suite #203
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 676-9299
August 2, 1995 PA @c
AUG 0 7 1995
JOHN SCH@ JR.
30561 MILKY WAY DR.
TEMECULA, CA 92592
Dear Mr. Schaap:
Your letter of 6-29-95 has been reviewed by the Board of
Directors.
In view of the fact that the city of Temecula is working on the
issues you raise, we are forwarding a copy of your letter to
Mr. Marty Lauber
City of Temecula
Traffic Engineer
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca 92590
Sincerely Yours,
Luci Ralston, for
Board of Directors
cc:Mr. Marty Lauber with Enclosure
-C)L@
@a-s
@OZD
7M
-7C) @C--7 CA t-
.0@ N\m
CD@ 7Z
(L-, MC
C (S) I\A NA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
FROM:Ken Bruckman / President
STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
42244 Cosmic Dr.
Temecula, CA 92592
(909) 699-6590
DATE:August 24, 1995
SUBJECT-Item 4
Starlight Ridge Traffic Study
With respect to the above-mentioned Starlight Ridge Traffic Study, I am confident the homeowners
in our neighborhood would welcome and fully support any Police Department plan to enforce the
25 MPH speed limit in our neighborhood, as well as the scheduling of the Radar Display Unit
throughout the neighborhood, as recommended in Marty Lauber's report.
However, I would like to offer a rebuttal to Marty Lauber's responses to the issues I raised in my
previous memo to the commission dated 6/22/95.
1.)The main roadway in Starlight Ridge is being used as a short-cut. Marty Lauber's response that
theCosmic/Santa Cecilia roadway is not being used as a short cut is nothing short of argumentative.
Hisforecast of each single family residence making 10 trips per day is ridiculous. His final comment
"All public streets are provided for anyone to use on whatever paths they select" is again -
argumentative. I invite anyone with an interest to my home for a first-hand evaluation of the
situation.
2.) Vehicle speeds are a problem. The traffic study was done during the same time the city
contracted to trim the street trees in our neighborhood. Most of the time there were large trucks
etc. This has undoubtedly resulted in a flawed
ction in speed along Cosmic Drive (compared
to last year's study) can be attributed to the fact that the speed counters were 12 @d significantly
closer to the intersection with Santa Cecilia. In other words, drivers had already begun to decelerate
into t e turn or had not fully accelerated out of the turn. Nevertheless, t
but not nearly as much as appears to be
indicated.
With respect to collision history for the area (Table "B" in Marty Uuber's report), there have already
been two accidents in the neighborhood during the first three months of 1995, compared to only one
per year in each of the previous two years. This can be viewed either as "only" two accidents, or an
800% increase, depending on your perspective.
3.) The existing vehicle volumes are a problem. The traffic volumes may appear to be low - except
when consideration is given to the fact that most of this traffic is occurring at the same time that the
little children in our neighborhood a e walking to and from Vail Elementary School. As mentioned
previous Y, there are no sidewalks in Starlight Ridge, and these little kids are being forced to share
the streets with this traffic.
4.) Request to extend Moraga Road through to Mira Loma Dr. If this, as Marty Lauber states, "is
not in our future", I would like to request that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission develop an
alternative long-term plan to correct this design flaw. Ideally, such a plan should be coordinated
with the school district in such a way as to alleviate the parking situation around Vail Elementary
School.
In the meantime, I would like to recommend that the Traffic/Safety Commission approve the
installation of stop controls at the following locations:
1.Mira Loma Drive at Santa Cecilia (at the entrance to Vail Elementary School).
2.Santa Cecilia Drive at Agena (not on Agena at Santa Cecilia)
3.Santa Cecilia Drive at Cosmic.
Thank you for your efforts and consideration of these matters.
cc: Joe Kicak
-2
December 6, 1995 REC@EIVEE)
City of Temecula DEC I 1 1995
43174 Business Park Drive CITY OF TEMECULA
Temecula, CA 92590 ;-:NGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:Mr. Marty Lauber
Temecula Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT:COSMIC WAY & SANTA CECILIA DRIVE
STARLIGHT RIDGE RESIDENTIAL AREA
DEAR SIRS:
I live on Santa Cecillia Drive in the Starlight Ridge area.
A while back a man came to my door all upset about the
traffic flow on his street. The man was Don Maston and the
street he lives on is Cosmic Way. He was so persuasive that
I signed his petition which was to go to the City of Temecula
to "ask" what could be done about slowing traffic on his
street. I told him my street was just fine but he gave me
all this "high speed" hoop-la about his.
Afterwards I realized he hadn't given me enough information
for me to sign such a document and the information he did
give may well be erroneous.
I called the city offices to have them take my name off the
list but was told the City needed a letter from me requesting
City of Temecula to take my name, Elaine Bailey, off that
petition signed in October asking the City to do something.
THIS LETTER IS MY OFFICIAL REQUEST FOR MY SIGNATURE TO BE
DELETED FROM THAT OCTOBER PETITION.
First of all, let me tell you what I see on Santa Cecilia
Drive at the corner of Verdadero. I am a non-working mother
and home most of the day except for running kids to and from
school (Temecula Valley High School) and running various
errands at various times of the day. During school traffic
hours I specifically avoid going to town via Santa Cecilia,
Mira Loma, Rancho Vista, Ynez, etc. due to the need to keep
Vail Elementary School as free of extra traffic as possible
during those times. Instead I go up Santa Cecilia and left
on Cosmic Way to Rancho California - right past Mr. Maston's
house. These are the onlv two ways I can get to most of the
shopping centers in Temecula.
I -AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO CLOSING SANTA CECILIA AT COSMIC
WAY!!!!! I did not realize this was what Mr. Matson intended
until I read it in the newspaper. Not only would I be
blocked from my travels every day to the Lucky shopping
center (my son works there and I also soon hope to) but from
the City's viewpoint, even more important, would be the
blocking of access to Vail Elementary School. At present
there are only three ways to access Vail Elementary School:
1)One is RANCHO VISTA coming from Temecula Valley High
area (the Southwest part of the area).
2)The second is RANCHO VISTA coming from Ynez (the
eastern part of the area).
3)The third is SANTA CECILIA DRIVE from Cosmic from
Rancho California (the northeastern part of the area).
Imagine yourself looking down on a map at the location of
Vail Elementary School. You see three possible major access
routes to the school as listed above. Cut Santa Cecilia and
you have two, but on only one street, Rancho Vista.
SUPPOSE THERE IS AN EARTHQUAKE, OR FIRE, OR SOME SORT OF
DISASTER THAT CUTS RANCHO VISTA ACCESS OFF, ONE OR BOTH WAYS.
AMBULANCE, POLICE AND FIRE, NEVER MIND PARENT ACCESS TO THEIR
CHILDREN, WOULD BE GREATLY RESTRICTED TO THE EMBARRASMENT OF
PUBLIC OFFICIALS PERHAPS EVEN CAUSING NEEDLESS LOSS OF LIFE.
The fact that one man is going around stirring up so much
trouble because he bought a house on a busy street and now HE
has a one-year old child and wants to clip everybody else's
access to his street for his own benefit makes me ill. When-
my children were young, we bought houses on cul-de-sacs even
before they were born. This man wasn't smart enough to think
ahead and do that for his child and now he wants everybody
else to give of their freedom for his own indiscretion.
America seems to be drowning in the Blame Game Era; blame
everybody else for N,our own mistakes.
Now I'm not saying Mr. Matson has the perfect environment on
his street; although when I drive it past his house about 6
to 8 times a day (3 to 4 trips a day on average), it always
seems calm and quiet to me. In fact, I find drivers along
Cosmic at the top of Santa Cecilia and Cosmic are especially
cautious and curteous as I am. There is no stop sign there
and one is not needed as motorists on a daily basis have been
cautious and considerate.
You may have clocked a few high speed offenders. Teenagers
live in this neighborhood. We had problems with them the
summer of 1994 speeding down Verdadero afternoons and
especially late at night. Sometimes it felt like they would
keep coming across Santa Cecilia right up our driveway and
into our garage. We didn't go around the neighborhood and
say the City should block Verdadero at Santa Cecilia because
.there were some reckless offenders. NO, SOLVE THE PROBLEM BY
ARRESTING THE OFFENDERS AND THEN THE PROBLEM WILL GO AWAY.
YOU DON'T RESTRICT EVERYBODY'S RIGHT AND NECESSITY TO FREE
ACCESS BECAUSE OF A FEW OFFENDERS. By the way, our problem
was eventually solved. Last summer was quiet and peaceful
again; this too shall pass Mr. Matson!
I specifically told Mr. Matson at the time he came around
that I was opposed to closing any streets to which he replied
that "they probably wouldn't do that anyway; this was just to
get them to do something" such as the speed bumps we were
talking about.
The newspaper mentioned narrowing the street and putting
medians in. I would support that on Cosmic Way if it would
help keep speed down. A planted median would increase
property values rather than blocked access decreasing it.
Another thought, there is always going to be some drunk who
speeds down somebody's street sometime; there is always going
to be someone with car problems and brakes fail; there is
always going to be somebody on roller blades who has never
skated before and runs into a car at the bottom of the hill
as happened this past year on Cosmic. My point is THERE IS A
MEDIUM THAT MUST BE MAINTAINED. IF YOU DO TOO LITTLE,
SOMEONE MAY GET HURT; IF YOU DO TOO MUCH, MANY MAY BE HURT;
AND NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU GO OVERBOARD TO TRY TO CONTROL
THINGS, THE SAD FACT IS THAT ACCIDENTS WILL HAPPEN.
Should the fellow who went up Santa Cecilia Drive (my street)
late at night this past year at 70 miles (drunk) and slammed
into a neighbors mailbox and garage door cause me to lead a
neighborhood campaign to close street access to my street? I
think not. A few offenders do not control the rights of the
many law abiding citizens, unless our police department
reneges on its duty to succumb such offenders, and unless we
as a society are ready to submit to a totalitarian form of
government. I think not.
Please take my opinion and suggestions seriously. If a
decision is contemplated to close off Santa Cecilia Drive at
Cosmic Way, I do believe the City of Temecula would be mired
in the mud of a major civil war between the residents of
Starlight Ridge.
RESPECTFULLY,
ELAINE BAIICV
30095 SANTA CECILI.
TEMECULA, CA 92592
(909) 695-9387
STARLIGHT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
c/o Ralston Management
27919 Front Street, Suite 203
Temecula 'CA 92590
(909) 676-9299
February 9, 1996 RECEI'VELr-.',
FEB 2 0 1996
Mr. Marty Lauber CITY OF -rLzMECULA
Traffic Engineer @-NGINEERIN@ DEPARTVEN-
City Of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Traffic Problems in Starlight Ridge
Dear Mr. Lauber:
Per your request, I am hereby notifying you in writing that the
Starlight Ridge Homeowners I Association would like the City of
Temecula to mi-Ligate the traf f ic Eroblems in our neighborhood. We
have been requesting action from the city staff, the Trattic Satety
Commission, and the City Council f or a long time. Our past
president, Wayne Hall, began requesting action approximately three
years ago, after picking up a child that had been hit by a car on
the way to Vail Elementary School. Since then, there have been
several more accidents and near tragedies, particularly along
Cosmic and Santa Cecilia Drives. As we have pointed out on
numerous occasions, there are no sidewalks in our neighborhood.
This creates a very dangerous situation of children walking in the
neighborhood streets to and from Vail Elementary School, with cars
going up and down the hills and around curves at excessive rates of
speed.
Much of this traffic is coming from outside of our neighborhood,
caused by the poor traffic patterns in the surrounding areas. Two
examples of poor traffic design can be found in the way the main
entrance of Vail Elementary School faces a residential street
(Santa Cecilia Drive) instead of facing Rancho Vista Road and the
way Moraga Road stops at Rancho California Rd., instead of
extending into Mira Loma Dr., where there are two large apartment
complexes. Further exacerbating the situation are several large
apartment complexes along the south side of Rancho California
between Ynez @oad and Moraga Road. The children in these complexes
must be transported through our neighborhood to Vail Elementary
School, due to the lack of a connector street between Rancho
California Road and the school. Cosmic and Santa Cecilia Drives
have become, in effect, an extension of Moraga Rd.
We would like to have the City of Temecula develop a comprehensive
plan to mitigate the dangerous situation that these poor traffic
patterns cause in our neighborhood. The city currently has
received funding to build a sidewalk along Santa Cecilia Drive from
Vail Elementary School to Cosmic Drive. This is a good start, but
represents a partial solution. Per your "Traffic Engineer's
Report" to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission dated June 22,
1995, the intersection of Rancho California at Cosmic was ranked Al
on the "Traffic Sianal Priority List". This also represents a
partial solution. What is really needed is the implementation of
some of the "traffic calming" techniques recently adopted by the
City Council. More specifically we would like to see curb
modifications (i.e., traffic circles, chokers, and entry
statements) along Santa Cecilia and Cosmic Dr., along with Stop
signs (where appropriate). Ideally, such modifications should be
designed in such a way as to miminize the loss of parking in front
of the affected homes.
We would like to see these traffic calming techniques integrated
into a comprehensive solution, in conjunction with the already
funded sidewalk along Santa Cecilia and the proposed traffic signal
at Cosmic Dr. and Rancho California Rd. Perhaps most important of
all, we would like to see the city staff, the Traffic/Public Safety
Commission, and the City Council to put an end to the bureaucratic
obstacles they have created and instead work with us in developing
a permanent 2olution to our problem before another child is hurt or
killed i;,@ our neighborhood.
Sitcereay,11
Kn B President
Starlight Ridqe Homeowners' Association
cc:Ron Bradley, City Manager
Joe Kicak, Director of Public Works
Karl Lindemanns, Mayor
Jeff Stone, City Council
Pat Birdsall, City Council
Ron Roberts, City Council
Steven Ford, City Council
Ron Perry, Public/ Traffic Safety Commission
Steve Sander, it
Knox Johnson, If
Ron Guerrero,
Charles Coe,
Pat Yavno, Principal/Vail Elementary School
Forrest Thomas, Director of Transportation & Safety
Scott Harvey, Project engineer
ITEI\4 27
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE
FINANCE DIREI
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project, Project No. PW94-10
Acquisition of Real Property
PREPARED BY: J. Robert Flandrick, Burke, Williams & Sorensen
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recommends the City Council:
1 .Conduct a hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public
comments and close the hearing; and
2.Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain
proceeding so as to acquire the Property.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
(SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE
GIRASOL; WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT)
Note:This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council; and
3.Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; and
4.Approve a warrant in the amount of $10,460.00, payable to the Clerk of the Superior
Court for the deposit required to be made with Court.
5. Authorize the City Manage to execute all necessary documents.
r. \agdrpt\96\04 23\walcott. rasr/aip
BACKGROUND:
That in order to proceed with the Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project ('Project") it is
necessary for the City to acquire four (4) parcels of real property. Compliance with CEQA has
been accomplished with regard to the Project.
The rights of way required to be obtained consist of four (4) parcels of property, are described
on Exhibit 'A', attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"). The
purpose of the acquisition is for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto.
The Property is owned by Robert J. Drolet and the RJD-1 Trust, created by a document dated
April 21, 1992. The Property consists approximately 0.532 acres or 22,781 square feet. The
use of Property currently is for a site of a mobile home.
Prior to bidding the Walcott Corridor project, staff met with the owner's representative and
prepared an easement document which was reviewed by the City Attorney and acceptable to
the property owner. Subsequently, the property owner changed his mind and would not grant
the easement.
Submitted with this staff report is a copy of the offer the City made to the property owner
which offer is required to be made pursuant to applicable law. In addition, submitted herewith
are copies of the Notice of Hearing which was given to the property owner by First Class Mail,
in accordance with the applicable statutes.
It is necessary at this point for the City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider the
adoption of a resolution of necessity which would authorize the filing of condemnation
proceedings to acquire the Property. Notice of this hearing was timely given in the manner
prescribed by law.
An independent appraisal was obtained for the Property.
Enclosed are:
A.A brief summary of the appraisal reflecting the values which were utilized by the
City in making the required offer to the property owner; and
B. A map depicting the location of the Property.
After conducting the public hearing, if the City Council finds that the public necessity so
requires it, the City Council should adopt the resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings
for the purpose of acquiring the Property.
The findings which need to be made are as set forth in a draft of a Resolution of Necessity
which is transmitted herewith.
Questions relating to value are not relevant to this proceeding. However, that does not mean
that negotiations for the acquisition of the Property are at an end. If the Council adopts the
Resolution of Necessity after the hearing, the staff will contact the property owner and attempt
to reach agreement on the value to be paid for the Property. However, in order to meet time
constraints, the City Attorney should be instructed to file the necessary condemnation action.
r. \agdrpt\96\04 2 3\walcott. rear/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds are available in the Development Impact Fees for the acquisition of the four
(4)parcels required to construct the street improvements for the Walcott Corridor Project.
Attachment:
1 Resolution 96-
r\agdrpt\96\0423\walcott.rear/ajp
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTIONOF TBE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY
OFFINDINGANDDE GTHATTHE
PU BLICT, CONVENHNCE AND NECESSITY
REQUM THE ACQIMMON OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (SO T CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT
CORRIDOR STREET R"RO PROJECI)
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Temecula (hereafter "City') hereby finds,
determines and declares as follows:
a. The public interest, convenience and necessity require the acquisition by said City
of certain interests ("Interests') in and to certain real property ("Property") located in the City,
the County of Riverside, State of California for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant
thereto, located adjacent to the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol, which is a part
of the Walcott Corridor Street Corridor Improvement Project ("Project").
b. The Project is planned or located in a manner that win be most compatible with
the greatest public good and least private injury; and
C. The @g of the Interests as above described is necessary for the stated Project
and such taking is authorized by Section 19, Article I of the California Constitution. --@,@tion
37350 gi =., and Section 40401 !a =., of the California Government Code, Section 1230. 0 10
et IN, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and other applicable law; and
d. The offer to purchase required by California Government Code Section 7267.2
has been made to each owner of the Interests proposed to be acquired by the City.
Section 2: The City Council of the City hereby declares that it is its intention to
acquire said Interests in its name in accordance with the provision of the laws of the State of
California with reference to condemnation procedures, for public street purposes, and all uses
appurtenant thereto.
Section 3: That if any of the Interests have been appropriated to some public use, the
public uses to which they are to be applied by the City, as described above, are more necessary
and paramount public uses.
Section 4: Said Interests hereinabove referred to, the acquisition of which is required
by said public interest, convince and necessity for the purposes set forth in Section 1. Hereof,
is located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and are more
particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
as set forth in full. A map showing the general location of the Interests sought to be acquired
in this proceeding is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference
and made a @ hereof.
r\agdrpt\96\0,4 23\walcott. reor/ajp
Section 5: The City Attorney and the fm of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, as
counsel, under the direction of the City Attorney, are authorized and directed to prepare,
institute and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in the proper Court having
jurisdiction thereof as may be n for the acquisition of said Property described in Section
4.
Section 6: The City Clerk shall ce@ the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7: This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOF=, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of April, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby ce@ that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS:
NOES: - COUNCIL ERS:
ABSENT: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: - COUNC]ILMEMBERS:
r:NagdrptN96\0423\walcott.rear/alp
of Temecula
3174 Business Park Drive - Temecula, California 92590 @909) 694-1989 FAX (909) 6@-t-i999
April 3, 1996
Robert J. Drolet
1645 La Vista Del Oceano
Santa Barbara, California 93109
Subject:OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY
Project:Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project
Owners: Robert J. Drolet/RJD-1 Trust
Property
Location:Property located in Temecula, California at the
Southwest comer of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol
APN No.: 957-150-004
Description of Interests
To Be Acquired: Attached as Exhibits "A" and "B" incorporated herein by this reference, are
the legal descriptions of Parcels 1 through 4, inclusive, proposed for
acquisition and a map showing their location.
The City of Temecula hereby offers to purchase Parcels 1 through 4, inclusive, includina all improvements
located thereon referenced above for the appraised market value of $10,640.00.
An independent appraisal of value was made of the Interests to be acquired. The amou,-.i -e above offer
is the amount the City has determined to be the fair market value of these Interests. basis for that
determination is explained in the attached Appraisal Summary and incorporated herein by this reference. If
vou have any questions regarding this letter, the acquisition of the Appraisal Summary, please contact Don
Spa L-nolo, Principal Engineer, at (909) 694-641 1.
It is the Citv's hope that this price will be agreeable to you and that the acquisition can begin immediately.
Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Joseph Kicak
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
@P,,@T,c o, qec,C,Ecl @iDe, R- \cip\projxL&'@pw94\p-94- I O\d rolel llrisip
Robert J. Drolet
April 3, 1996
Page 2
I[We acknowledge receipt of the offer as presented including Exhibits "A" and "B".
Date
R: \cip\projecLs@pw94\pw,@ I O\drolct- ILr/njp
APPRATSAT,,';ITMMARY
Project:Acquisition of Right-of-Way - Southwest comer of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol (Walcott
Corridor Street Improvement Project) City of Temecula
Location: City of Temecula, County of Riverside
Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-150-004 (Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4)
Date of Valuation: February 9, 1996
Owner:Robert J. Drolet
Property Description: See Exhibit "A"
Zoning:Very Low Density Residential
Present Use: Site of a Mobile Home; two out Buildings
@ahest and Best Use: Very Low Density - Residential
Total Property Area: 2.94 acres; @g consists of .532 acres or 22,781 square feet
Public Use:Public Street purposes, and all uses appurtenant thereto.
Summary of Just Compensation:
The market value of the property being acquired is based upon a market value appraisal prepared in
accordance with accepted appraisal procedures. The valuation of your property has been based upon
an analysis of recent sales of similar properties in the immediate area. 'fhe appraiser has given full
and careful consideration to the highest and best use for development of the property and to all
features inherent in your property affecting its market value.
Total Value: $10,460.00
@s summary of the basis of the amount offered as just compensation is presented in compliance with
applicable laws and has been derived from a formal appraisal prepared by an independent fee appraiser.
R--'@cip\projects,p-9.4\p- -@ IO\drolet- IL,/.jp
T
LiN, Xi7LLI,4M FROS-@
@nez Road. Sui-L= 'loci
Temecula. California
FXI-'TQIT "A"
DESCRT(D77(l.@j
D
14. p
PARCEL 1 (Fee Title)
i-@a- -er-an :)arcel o@ land si-Lua-led in -=mecula, 3 L,,
the C-7y
8 c r teing
BE" as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 37
Paces 3@, -8
L c@,, 'o I 's a 10 'n-i
a OT land 40.00 fee-L in wd@Lh, the centerline of whi-_,i- Iq descrlb=-@- ;-zs
ovvs
COMMENCING a-L a Po i n-L, in the cent@.rljne of Calle r ;., s o I d'!S-Lan'L '-,her.-or
375.33from the centering of Nicolas Road as shown on
k-
Parcel, ma,,D , said point beinc the beginn-ng o- a angenz curve oncavn
southwesterly and having a radius @f 300.00 feet:
'-n-@nce alone said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet -hrough a central anc-,;n 0
-c 'he northeasterly line o@ said Par-el 4 and -he TRUE POINT OF
LI L L
Br'GINNING-.
continuing along said curve northwester-!,,v 139.8-/ @ee-- 'L,ll,rouch a
@C C
--u rve N c r 7 ' :7) 7- u@ A;-= E
@ine of saic Parcel and the POINT OF TERMINATIO@.
as 70
s n o r 3 s n- r I v one of Parcel 4 and northerly s -Lerm-,na--e in s:lzic
'ne -Ilz Par.-@-'i 4.
-,ON-,Ai-NING: -'-2 or- ';@-s-@
'!E@T TO a
X H IBT-1 B bV @l,, S r=
,nd z-,rence a c, -2a--
;Lawrence @a -:)n
E,-T@,l. 'T! 1 T 'Y.. ',@CST
@-5-5 ',In,-7 Road. Sul-@
L:-'XH T B T-7
:-@ll DISC'1'7T(-)@,l
L
PARCEL 2 (Fee Title)
7- 7 - -- I , - '. L-
- Cz s@@L;a-r-d in -he -er
Ca I 1 f or-r)@l a . be! nc t@a@ [)C)rt- on Dar-@-'l
L 7
as -7rowr on a mao tn=-!--to@ in BooK 37, -aq-es 'j7 and 38 oi-- Parce' mars
n @Lh e 0 1 iz i c) he C o u r-Ly P c-c o rde r o f s a 1 d P\ 1 v e r s 1 C o u -t- -v n c i Lj,@- e r-, n
strip c@ anc no.00 f ee-r in w-,,lth. the souineriy line of wh-,-n
@rd -?O.00 feet northerly zrom the following @@ine:
COMMENCING a -L a poirt in the cen@Lerline of C;-zlle d@s--ar@- --hereon
Souzn 24001'40" East 375.33 feet from the ceni@erline of@ Nicolas Road as shown on
said ' Darcel map, said point being the beginning of a tan-aen-@ curve concave
southwesterly and having a radius oi@ 300.00 feet,-
@L,@ence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet 'hrouqh a central angle ol@
L
27 '36" to the northeas-erlv line of said Parce', and TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
7-cr@-"@uing along said curve northwesterly ',,Irou-ch
anc e
thence '.ancent from- said curve North 77".--7'02" West 132.!'.Q -he
an--4 --,,e POINT OF TERMINATION.
shall L-)e -1--ng-Lhe@ed cr so as -3 -er,77nat@
7 s a
n @ea s v 'i n4i c,@ 7a 4 a nd @o,, i_n@- -1 So as 7C) 7@r,,-[,ina--
v line D@ P;-z r-
'-ON@ATNINC-: C-7-2@-
SUBJE,--T TO
-vi@v an,7
--XHT27- "B" D,,, -hS
L -e i@-2r,-2nce mace a Da r7 r--2r7
-awrenc@- a,--or.
B7!,Nl. l@4- ' 'AM FDOST 61\ID
27'--3:-) @'n=7 Road. Suite
l@ornia
T
iT
L
-Z'- -77,
-,AR,C7-i OF iD,@'RCcL'L @lr@P \@o.
P@,PCEL 3 (Fee Til-.1e)
'n '7 -V
'z n
-,7
8S snown on map the!-eot n B o o Dages
,- e o-c the County RecorLier of said Riverside County' nclite@- w- r
a s-@rip o@ 'anc: 5.00 feet in width, the northerly line c-ic which is parallel '-,,v 'I
.n@- 20.00 -lc=-e-- southerly from 'the 1--o'llowing cc-sci-ibE?c iine@
COMMENCING ;- -- a po@n-L in the cen-L-=rllne ol-' CAI'lle G'Irasol s t-I a n =-on
South 2,@"01'40" East 375.33 feet from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown o,i
said Parcel map, said point beina the beginning of a -Langen-L, curve concave
s-@u--.nwes@.nr7y and having a radius 300.00 @ee@
oi
'-@ence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet. through a central anqle of
-he northeasterly "line of said Parcel and TRUE POFNT OF
@@-TNNIN"
-i@@,,nc along said -Lirv@ n-r@hwes-
L) L Ler'l
y 39. @nrc)ugh
an @.7 c,!@
-_,,,,,:,nce @-;-;nQent- -:c-cm said curve Nor,-Lh 770:7)2'0-2" '4es-- 'i-32./'-c l@n- n- -L @-o --he
-ON.
,@--,n,vves-=riv iire c- said Parc--l and the POINT OF TERMINATF.
n e r-l' -- - - - r- I I -
c n d s b e 1 e n c@ -@ 7, n- q;-z @- o r s h o r as-= S,- as -errr@,jra-@
o@ -1 and nor--Lher'!V S3 ES L
c Pa - I
C: @_7
SU TO ---@ve@an-Ls. -c I @@a v -nr4 --
7
--v'-iT2-T "B" no @,v -.,7-@s mai
A,
L a!- C,-
3527 Ld
30 -
T I L- AM FROS-ir D
Yne7 Road. Suit=
L
7-X@'7@,T7 "A"
-77,@NI
P,,' , A D
P/,
IRC@@i- MAP @ic.
Fee T@. 'cl ;-a)
7.a r-@ -
c n
L C 'arce-I o@ Pa-c-I Map No.
- v@-rs-ij@-. @---Le o@ 'a iii@crnia, being -Lna@L portion o@@
7
Q@81/-.as snown on a map :nereof filed in Book 3 , Paces 37 and 38-c@ Parcel Maps
-.n the Llil@i@ice of the County Recorder of said Riversice Coun-v. iyinq northerly
L,
]-;in@- Darallel w-;It-l@. and 50.00 feet nor',-her@v @rom -,ie 'ol'@ow-no -escribe@
L Li
7
COMMENCING a@ a point in the centerline of Calle C-irasol distant thereon
South 24'0'1-'I'O" East 377.33 fee-,-- from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown on
r@l-cj-ce,@ Mac. said Do-In. being the beginning n, i@ a @Langen-. curve concave
a@c:riav,,nc a raci-lus of 300.00
7
alone said curve northwesterly 142.03 -,Fee' - @rouch a c=-n--,-a' AnQ]e C)'
3 r, i-,n@- r,T Sa',;-' TR LI POINT OF
Bl--,-@INNING-.
-C @ch a -enra-i
-n@nce -or-i-ulng alon- ----d -urve northwesterly
L
---nc=n- -rom @-,,-ve North zo -1h@-
7RMT
-,7 POINT O@ NATT3N.
-]N7A!N'-NG: s rl,, o r-;-a ol i@ss.
7_ i c v a
r) -
L.S. 3527
30 - 9
C,4ZZZ' SIA7AS01
7,4A3Z,E a@ f,04YR@5
EXHIBIT 'B' _SKETCH
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET / OF I" SHEET
NICOLAS ROAD
FEE TITLE @bcrT'BcyiL.William cfr-ost 6&@ssociatcs
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
S---'E 2Y, - TF--@CUL@
PARCEL 4 OF P.M. NO. 8847
LD 80 JOE? NC
7- A4 / 7,f
INOTICE OF
@NOTICE OF HEARING
NG REGARDING = INTENTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, A GENERAL LAW CIT-x',
TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION
OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN AND TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TO:Robert J. Drolet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 et. seq.,
that the City Council of the City of Temecula intends to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Ne-@,-ssirv for
acquisition by eminent domain of certain real property, for public street purposes and all uses appurtenant
thereto, desio-mted as Parcels I throueh 4, inclusive, as described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference ('The Property"). The acquisition of The Property is required in order
to proceed vath the Walcott Corridor Street Project ('Project"). That Exhibit "B", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference is a map depicting The Property.
The hearing will be held on April 23, 1996 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City Council can
hear said matter, at the Council Chambers, at the Community Recreation Center located at ' )0875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California 92592.
You as a person c or having an interest in and to the Property and are hereby notified that you
have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered at that hearing. The issues which will be
considered, are as follows:
I .Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
Whether or not the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible
with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3 .Whether or not the Property souzht to be acquired is necessary for the Pro ect; and
4.Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the
owner or owners of record.
If you @-i to be heard at this hearing, you NFUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST, indicating vour
intent to ap@ @ be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this notice by @g or @-e-. - --,-insz ti-lat
w@nen request to the City Clerk, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590; telephone (909)
694-6444.
You may use the -enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and desire to be heard. n@
failure tn timely file a IQ aW= and be heard may result in a waiver of ynur ri ht tn b
For further information, contact the City Clerk's Office at City Hall at (909) 694-6444.
@ity @,t@-PL
NOTICE OF HEARING, Page 2
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR
THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY.
Name Telephone
Address
Dam
Signature
R- pwQ4\p-9-1- 10\drolcLhmalp
-(n;-L -7 Roac.
Z: --7
T
4 P, T 1
L.'ha L-
7 rg
a D r-- 0 I -s 9 ;, n Book 37, z-nt
'@e@:)r-er O@ Sa, t
c) l@ land 00
i eL in wid@Ln, the cen-@erline 1 whicri 's
C)WS
COMMENCING a a Poinz n the c--nterl 1, ne of raso i i, -1 nzr=or
cc' - S@,@,vr 07-
0 3 /7 5 . 3 J' fee- --roM -he cen-@er'i4i ne i@j
sa-C pon-L being the beginning CT a -LanQe@jT: --.rve ccric@-,va-
sc,@-,@wes-@--rly and having a radius of 300.00 feet:'
-urve nor-hwes@er'y 142. 03 -hr-,u,@, a --nci@
onc ---a7 L
T --o -.he northeasterly line CT saic: Par--=-'! 4 ant -L.- =-TRUE POi@Nlr Or'
BEGINNING.-
-nuinc A. ion- carve norz@wes+,=-rly r 0 u
-Ur,,i@ \Ior-h
3@ sa7@ -,;zrcel i an- th@ POINT OF TEDMINATION.
nr sharers-'
v
@C- 37 @-arc@- and nor-,ner- i v sc
@X,H 3 TT "S"
;;wrenc@
7orn,---
7,, e
7 - - - - - - -
PAPC:-7L 2 (,zee Ti-Ile)
na L
07 Zl e r S -
,n zra- County Recorder olz said P,, -,/e un-v. n e,-,
n )v-, /v r,, -i -
L
@i :,he soulrier, 'n@- P,-; @;-z
anc I:-@e-@ nor-LI ierly -1c,- o m the following desc - 71 ;=,7 ne@
COMMENCING a@ ;z Doi-@L in the --enter,,Ine oz Sol -@s-an- -,@erecn
C)
Soul,, c s 3 e e r, c) m 'L h e n t
7@ - --, .@:) a z-s z-,-cwri
Said Darce-I maD, said point being the beginning a -angen,- ,urve -@ncave
S"Du@-hwes--=-r@y and havina a radius of 300.00 feel@.
-,,-Ienc=- along said curve northwesterly 14'.03 fee- --rouqh a central anQ'= c--
LI - @i @
C, L@ -rce,, and the TRUE POINT OF
27'07'3"' -- -he nor-,@easterlv line c-- said P;z
B-'TNNING:
erc.z cor-,,nuing @-7onc sa,,-@ r-,.,rve northwestern-,,/
A-nc@@- ci 26@12'46"-
-,hencr-- zancen-. @-aiu curve North /77"02',@ll"' 'Aes-
-@7RM7
-- e ;-z r 1 @nc POTN-@ DF NA--'N,
-er7,
o-: --anc s,-,a @e -ienc,-,.@eried or
_S:Z@7 7
s r -L@ie@ ne c@ DA-C=,l
anc
iine
71
-VH757-
z
7
T 7
7
-'4RCEL 3 (Fee 7,Z@e)
C.
@-,@,own on 7,,,z Book
-,,@e Counzv Recor--@-@r o@ said R,,ver-,--
n c-@ t'Llhe nor,.ner i @/ "I , r,.E -s
@,n,.- 2n..OC l@eel-. sou-@,@er-l\/ icrom the -@'ollowing descr4lbe@, ]In=.
COMMENCING a
L @@n7@r 17ne e s
Sou-L.- 2,"001-','O" 375.1.3 !z=-e-L, I=rcm the cz-n-Ler7lin.- o lc N-;c-u:as z-s sho@vn on
L
Sal" I)a'c=' mal), poin7, being the beginning oT a zar,,gan- r -"@e -onc@\,'e
anc: radius c@ 300.00 feet-.
-nce ong sa i d curve nor-L,@wes @Ler-'@v 1112.03 l@ee-. a -.en-L, r;.4 I an g
7 1 0
/'3c"' '-o the northeasterly line of said Parcel 4 and -L@,e TRUE POINT OF
7
P@E- L NNING,
-nc"@ c@
--a,,7cer-L I-- cm s a icurve N@orth 77"2'C2" Wes- l@?
L
s -- n-riv n@- c,- s;zi Dar-,-n-I 'I the POINT OF TERMINATION
an
-D c@ land s,@7 or s: z-s
;-z s -Le@ v iqe cl@ an,--, v
07 -';z
7 llq 11
7
::17 S
T 7 Z'
'152
6 - 30
7,1@l -RCS- il.11@
".=7
=,7,
C'@ D7
7 7-
ROAD
A
RCL-"
PARI@EL I (Fee @--;-LI e
@,@C CZ 7 7ja- -C, 1 17 71@
P\ s e 0 7ornia, Delng -Lna7- porr'or, o@ D--r-=7
39/17 7
as shown or a mac -.,el-eci@ -ic i le@, in Book n@ Ma L,
o@ saic Z@ @,17 7 1,
c I par@.1 lel with and 5u'.00 lc_=et ncr-Lher 1 @,i -:7-cm nc c, e s
-1@ne:
COMMENCING at a po@int in the conterline ci@ r@alle Gilraso-@ @@is-Lan-L thereon
South 24001'40" @- a s -LI 37:').33 feet from the centerline ol@ N'ico-ias Road as shown on
said Dar,r-,-] maD, said c)olnt beinc the beginning OT a 'L---nc:.en-L curve concpve
sol.,@L@,wes'--eriy and having a radius ol@ 300.00
thence alone said curve ncrthwes'-erlv 142.03 feet @Uh,-ouch a central anal@e O'@c
POT
-,7e nor-t@.@@s-= -ad ;z r-=' ;z r,. T R U NT OF
L-rly
BE"@INNTNG-
1-nence conl',-@nuina along said curve ncr-LhwesL@er'!y a cz-n-LI-al
aric e c@
'-@encn- -Lancen-. 'icrom sa curve Nor:.@
POIN-1@ OF -TON
TNTNG:
CONTA.L A--7es, -,for-= or less.
17 '7
I Ca MZ
f,4ZZZ- 671RA SOL
3 75. 3.3'
r,43ZZ- COlllfSES
@2zZ7'a7'.36" R-r3oO.@O." Z-=142.@'
@Z@@'42'46" AP--300.,Oe'
EXHIBIT 'E3' _SKETCH
SHEET / OF- /.- SHEET
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NICOLAS ROAD
FEE TITLE 'kobcr-t @cijZ,William 'Fr-ost 6Z@ssoc
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYC).
297SS SINGLE O.- DP"q - SUITE?50 - TE.ECLK., C.
PARCEL 4 OF P.M. NO. 8847 -&
'p@V/S@.9 Z-210--9(0 SCII@E E'-D BOOK ice NO
ITEN4 28
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF Fl
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director@
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Specific Plan No. 199,
McMillin Project Services, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding concerning Specific Plan
No. 1 99, McMillin Project Services, Inc. for authorizing the payment of development fees at
a specified level and directing the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and
the City Clerk to attest thereto.
ANALYSIS
The attached MOU authorizes McMillin Project Services, Inc. to obtain building permits and
occupancy permits for homes in their development without payment of the Public Facilities
Fees until such time as the first production home obtains its Certificate of Occupancy. This
provision is consistent with previous approvals granted to similar projects in the City such as
Costain Homes, Van Daele Development Corporation and Taylor Woodrow Homes California
LTD. The City will be negotiating a new Development Agreement between the City and
McMillin Project Services, Inc. for this project. Approval of this MOU will not mandate that
the City Council approve the draft Development Agreement. In the event that the City Council
denies the draft Development Agreement, the Memorandum of Understanding provides that
McMillin Project Services, Inc. will then pay the Public Facilities Fees as provided in the
existing Development Agreement No. 5.
The major differences between this proposed development agreement and others that have
been approved by the City are:
0The basic fee is revised from $3,000.00 per unit to $3,970.00 per unit (amount
proposed DMG Development Impact Fee Study).
0An additional ten percent ($397.00) of the basic fee is proposed to be added in
consideration of the five years of additional entitlements guaranteed under the
Development Agreement, thus bringing the total up to $4,367.00 per unit.
R:\STAFFRn\MCMa,LEN.MOU 4/15/96 mf 1
0McMillin will dedicate a fully improved 8.29 acre park to the City prior to the issuance
of building permits for the 608th unit. The City will apply a credit of 2.5 acres for the
existing Veteran's Park and a 50% credit for the golf course towards the Quimby
requirement, and a 25% fee credit towards the Parks and Recreation component of the
Public Facilities Fee for improvements to the golf course. The actual cost of improving
the 8.29 acre park will be credited towards the Parks and Recreation component of the
Public Facilities Fee.
One area of disagreement between staff and the applicant in the proposed agreement relates
to credits for public facilities. The applicant is requesting a credit of $315/unit, (see column
3 of Exhibit A ), for financial contributions made for improvements to Rancho California Road/1-
1 5 overcrossing and ramps. This issue is also discussed in Section 1 1, page 4 of the
agreement. It is staff's position that no credit should be given for these improvements;
however, the applicant is requesting Council consideration of this matter and will present an
argument at the hearing to support this position.
The actual adjusted fee after all credits have been deducted, (excluding the disputed $315.00
credit), is $3,924.50.
Because the language relating to the public facilities credit is still contained in the agreement,
staff will modify the documents to reflect Council direction on this issue after Council action.
The Planning Commission and City Council will be presented in the near future with the draft
Development Agreement. The terms of the draft Development Agreement will be subject to
extensive negotiations between the City and the developer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Interim Public Facilities Fee to be Collected at Project Buildout:
1,666 Dwelling Units X $3,924.50 = $6,538,217.00
Attachments:
1 . Exhibit (Vicinity Map) - Page 3
2.Memorandum of Understanding - Page 4
R:\STAFFRP'nM MOU 4/16/% mf
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBIT (VICINITY MAP)
R:\STAFFRn\MCMILLEN.MOU 4115/96 mf 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, MCMILLIN PROJECT SERVICES, INC.
ATTACHMENT - 1 VICINITY MAP
CilYCOUNCILDATE-APRIL23,1996
R:\STAFFRPT\MC@LEN.MOU 4/15/96 mf
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
I
R:\STAFF@\MC@LEN.MOU 4115/96 mf 4
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(Temeku Country Club)
Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into by and between the City of
Temecula ("City') and McMillin Project Services, Inc., a California Corporation ('McMillin')
to be effective on April 23, 1996, with reference to the following:
RECIIALS
A. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864, ct =. ("Development
Agreement Statutes") McMiUin's predecessor-in-interest, Margarita Village Development
Company (Bme-Rancho California and Nevada-Rancho California) and other landowners, entered
into a development agreement ("Development Agreement No. 5') with the County of Riverside
("County"), recorded November 7, 1988 as Instrument No. 325515 of the Official Records of
Riverside County, California.
B. Development Agreement No. 5 encompassed a 1,399 acre project formerly located
within the County known as Margarita Viflage-Specific Plan No. 199.
C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Development Agreement Statutes, the City
succeeded to the interest of the County under Development Agreement No. 5 upon incorporation
of the City in 1989 and the inclusion of the Margarita Village-Specific Plan No. 199 territory
within the municipal boundaries of the new City.
D. McMillin has entered into a contract to purchase title to a 472 acre portion of
Specific Plan No. 199, Village A, known as Temeku Country Club ('Temeku"). Temeku was
planned to be developed as a self-contained retirement community.
E. City and McMillin acknowledge that development of Temeku as a family oriented,
as opposed to a retirement, community will result in the generation of significant municipal
revenue and creation of diversified housing opportunities associated with a quality residential
project.
F. The City and McMillin further acknowledge that the Temeku subdivision cannot
be developed to be a viable project unless Development Agreement No. 5 is amended and restated
to provide for, among other things:
04-15-% 10026-00002
S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3
1. The on of the County Public Facilities and Services Nfitigation Fee
("County Public Facilities Fee") to be replaced with a City Public Facilities Fee;
2. Revisions to the Temeku entitlements to eliminate residential retirement
oriented housing;
3. Provide for maintaining landscaping adjacent to perimeter and collector
streets by the Temecula Community Service District;
4. Provide for satisfying City Ordinance No. 460.93 relating to park recreation
fees and dedications ("Quimby Requirement").
G. in acquiring Temeku, as the successor in interest to Margarita Village Development
Company, McMillin will become one of the developer parties to the Rancho California Road
Improvement Agreement dated November 12, 1991 and recorded as Instrument No. 429566 in
the Office of the Riverside County Recorder (the "Improvement Agreement'). The Improvement
Agreement provides, among other things, for construction by the City of certain improvements
to the I-15/Rancho California Road off-ramps and the widening of portions of Rancho California
Road. It is acknowledged @ Mc@'s obligation and share of the construction costs under the
Improvement Agreement is $524,360.
H. It is @er acknowledged between the City and McMillin that development of the
Temeku project is a complex process during which each of the parties will invest substantial time,
effort and monetary consideration. This MOU is intended to serve as a guideline for more
detailed and binding documentation necessary to ultimately implement the understandings of the
parties and to insure that the parties are aware of the significant commitments that each is
undertaking to accomplish the objectives set forth in this MOU. By these recitals, the parties
therefore wish to express their mutual understandings, responsibilities, and intentions prior to the
entering into a restatement and amendment of Development Agreement No. 5. City and McMillin
agree to cooperate and use their best efforts to quickly and completely implement the terms of this
mou.
A.GREEMENIS
1. S@fic Plan Amendment and Zone ChanLe oanninl, Area-s 38 an@. McMillin
shall apply for and City shall process an amendment to Specific Plan No. 199, Village A, to
enable McMillin to reduce and/or eliminate entirely the obligation to construct senior residential
housing. Mcshall also apply for and City shall process a Change of Zone to bring the
zoning for PlanningAreas 38 and 40 into conformance with the Medium High designation to be
consistent with otherresidential areas of Village A. City shall use its best efforts to process this
04-15-96 10026-00002 2
S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3
S Plan Amendment and Change of Zone to be co by the City P@g Commission
and the City Council on or before April 23, 1996.
2. Com@ensive Amendment to S@c Plan No. 199, VillaLe A. Soon after close
of escrow for the purchase of Temeku, Mc@ shall apply for and City agrees to process a more
comprehensive amendment to Specific Plan No. 199, Village A to provide, among other things,
for the conversion of the private roadways to be dedicated as a part of the City's public street
system. The comprehensive Speafic Plan amendment will also provide for a range of residential
product types and densities including custom home lots.
3. Quimby RcQuiremeM. It is agreed and understood that Mc shall satisfy its
obligations to dedicate park land or pay m lieu park fees under City Ordinance No. 460.93 as
follows:
(a) Mc@ @ dedicate to the City a fully unproved park to be used
for recreational purposes in accordance with the City's Quimby Requirement (see Example below)
prior to the issuance of the 608th building permit for residential dwelling units in Temeku.
(b) City shall provide a 50% credit towards the Temeku Quimby
Requirement because of the golf course;
(c) City shall provide a 2.5 acre credit for Veterans Park.
Example of CalculatinLy the Temeku Quimby Rcquiremenl:
Assuming 1,666 DU's x 2.59 persons per DU = 4,315
4,315 1,000 = 4.31
5 acres for every 1,000 people 5 x 4.31 = 21.57 acres
21.57- 50% golf course credit = 10.79 acres
10.79- 2.5 acres Veterans Park = 8.29 acres
Using this exwnple, McMillin would be obligated to dedicate an 8.29 acre
park to the City.
(d)Upon dedication of the land for a park as provided in Section 3(a)
of this MOU, Mc shall complete construction of the park improvements similar to other
public parks of the same size and classification at a cost to be agreed upon by City and Mc
prior to the issuance of the 608th building permit.
4. Restatement and Amendment of DevelQpment ALreement No-5. In accordance
with the Development Agreement Statutes, City agrees to negotiate in good faith and process
04-15-96 10026-00002 3
S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3
within six (6) months of the date of this MOU a restatement and amendment of Development
Agreement No. 5 relating to Temeku ('Amended Development Agreement").
5. Term of Amended and Restated DevelMment ALreement. The term of the
amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5 shall be ten (10) years.
6. County Public Facilities and Service E=. The Amended Development Agreement
shall eliminate the County Public Facilities Fee as it may be applied to Temeku and substitute a
City development impact fee and development agreement premium fee applicable to residential
dwelling units constructed in Temeku which shall be referred to in this MOU as the "City Public
Facilities Fee".
7. City Public Facilities Fee. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide
for the payment of a City Public Facilities Fee in the amount adopted by City for each detached
or attached residential unit constructed by McMillin or any other merchant builder of residential
units within the Temeku @. Based on the Development Impact Fee Study prepared by David
M. Gffft & Associates, Ltd., dated January 8, 1996, the City Public Facility Fee for residential
units is currently being considered in the amount of $3,970 per each detached dwelling unit. The
City Public Facilities Fee under review by the City is broken down into different components and
amounts for detached residential units as more particularly shown on Exhibit A attached to and
made a part of this MOU by this reference.
8. Adjustment of City Public Facilities Fee. The Amended Development Agreement
shall provide that the amount of the City's Public Facilities Fee for residential units within the
Temeku subdivision shall be ad . usted each year from the date of recording the Amended
Development Agreement based on the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles, Anaheim,
Riverside Region.
9. Develol2ment Agreement Fee. The Amended Development Agreement shall
provide that in consideration of City granting vested development rights, McMillin shall pay a
premium development agreement fee which shall be added to the City Public Facility Fee in an
amount of a 10% increase to each component of the City Public Facilities Fee as shown in
Column 2 of Exhibit A.
10. Payment of City Public Facilifies F=. The City Public Facilities Fee, including
the Development Agreement Fee, @ be paid at the time of issuance of building permits for each
residential dwelling unit to be constructed in Temeku subject to the provisions of Sections 1 1 and
12 of this MOU.
11.Public Benefits and Credits. In consideration of McMillin dedicating and
improving apublic park as provided in this MOU, as well as setting aside substantial private
usable openspace associated with the golf course and providing the existing Veterans Park, the
04-15-96 10026-00002 4
S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3
Park and Recreation Impact Fees component of the City Public Facilities Fee shall be adjusted m
the amount as shown in Column 4 on Exhibit A. In @er consideration of McMiUin's @cial
contribution to certain improvements to the 1-15/Rancho California Road off-ramp and the
widening of portions of Rancho California Road as provided in the Improvement Agreement, the
Street System Impact Fees Component of the City Public Facilities Fee shall be adjusted in the
amount as shown in Column 4 on Exhibit A.
12. Total Park and Recreation Impact Fees Oblipstion. Column 5 of Exhibit A sets
forth the adjusted Park and Recreation Impact Fees for detached residential units in the amount
of $1,327.40 per unit. Assuming Temeku is approved for development with 1,666 detached
residential units, McMila's total Park and Recreation Impact Fees obligation would be $1,327.40
x 1,666 DU's = $2,211,448.40.
13. Payment of the Park and R fion Tmpwt Fees for First 608 Dwelling @. In
consideration for Mc constructing and paying for the cost of constructing the park as
provided in this MOU, the Park and Recreation Impact Fees of the City Public Facilities Fee as
shown in Column 5 on Exhibit A for the first 608 building permits issued for residential dwelling
units in the Temeku subdivision shall not be imposed. The amount of the City Public Facilities
Fee for the first 608 Temeku dwelling units would therefore be $2,282. 10.
14. Remainine Park and R tion Fees Ob]iLyaWm. McMi@'s Park and Recreation
Impact Fees obligation for all dwelling units constructed after 608 units would be based on the
number of approved dwelling units remaining minus the cost of the park improvements. For
example, if McMillin spends $1,000,000.00 on park and recreation improvements, this amount
would be subtracted from Mc@'s total Park and Recreation Impact Fees obligation
($2,211,448.40 - $1,000,000.00) resulting in a remaining obligation of $1,211,448.40 which
would be spread over the balance of (1,666 - 608 DU's) 1,058 dwelling units.
15. Interim Public Facilities E=. Pending adoption of the City Public Facilities Fee
and approval of the Amended Development Agreement by City, McNfillin shall pay an Interim
Public Facilities Fee of $2,282. 10 per each Temeku residential dwelling unit.
16. Preference. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide that in the event
City approves a City Public Facility Fee or any component of the City Public Facilities Fee in an
amount which is less ffin the amount(s) provided on Exhibit A or if City approves, a City Public
Facility Fee or any component thereof for any other detached residential dwelling units in an
amount(s) which is less than applicable to the Temeku residential dwelling units, or if the City
approves a Development Agreement Fee which is less than provided in this MOU, City shall
adjust the amounts of City Public Facility or any component thereof and/or the Development
Agreement Fee applicable to the Temeku detached residential dwelling units as shown on
Exhibit A to equal the lesser fee amount(s). If any attached dwelling units are constructed in
04-15-96 10026-00002 5
S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3
Temeku, City agrees to apply the adopted components and fees for attached residential umts with
the same proportional adjustments as shown on Exhibit A.
17. Conversion of Temeku Private Roads to Public Streets. City agrees to accept as
part of the public street system the roadway design and set back widths from curbs shown on
approved plans and recorded tract maps. McMillin will dedicate necessary easements to
accommodate sidewalks.
18. F-xtension of Tract Maps. The Amended Development Agreement shall provide
for automatic extension of tentative tract maps for the term of the amended and restated
Development Agreement No. 5 pursuant to Section 66452.6 of the California Government Code.
19. Tentative Tract M=s - Perimeter WaUs. The Amended Development Agreement
shall provide that tract map conditions shall be amended to provide that the construction of
perimeter walls, landscaping and installation of irrigation systems shall be constructed in phases
as the adjacent tracts are developed within Temeku.
20. Tentative Tract No. 23371-15. The City shall approve Tentative Tract No. 23371-
15 subdividing into lots the remaining portion of the golf course not included as part of other
Temeku U= maps. Mv mapping of the golf course is for fi=cing purposes with a goal of being
accomplished by April 9, 1996 or as soon thereafter that is reasonably possible.
21. Maintenance of Exterior Landscape Areag and Collector Streets. The Amended
Development Agreement shall provide for the consideration by City of maintaining all exterior
landscape areas a4jacent to main collector withm the development (66" width). AU interior
landscape areas must be maintained by a homeowners association. The City will not maintain
block waus or entry monuments.
22. Mirpgrita Road Reimbursement. McMiUin's obligation to reimburse City for the
cost of constructing certain roadway improvements to the east side of Margarita Road from
Rancho California Road to Las Serena shall be $185.00 per residential unit applicable to the first
800 residential units constructed in the Temeku subdivision.
23. F-xtension of Tentative Tract No. 23371. It is agreed ffig pursuant to the provisions
of California Government Code Section 66452.6, applicable to the f@g of multiple final maps,
the life of Tentative Tract No. 23371 is extended until November 8, 2000.
24.Indemnity and Cost of T,itipation.
24.1 County Litigation Concerning MQU. In the event the County seeks to
challenge the right of City and McMillin to enter into this MOU, and institutes an action, suit, or
proceeding to challenge this MOU or invalidate and/or enjoin the enforcement of this MO.U, City
04-15-96 10026-00002 6
S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3
and Mc@ agree to cooperate and participate in a joint defense in any action against the parties,
@ officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all such obligations, liability, suit,
claim, loss, judgment or lien, resulting from such action(s) brought by County, (but excluding
actions to expunge any lis pendens) and to share, the costs associated with attorneys, fees, and
costs @ the may incur as the result of any such action or lawsuit to challenge City and/or
McMiUin's legal authority to enter into this MOU. If the County action is against all impacted
developments for which the City has lowered the County Public Facilities Fee, Mc 's defense
costs herein shall be its pro rata share among all impacted landowners based on a fi-action, the
numerator of which is the total units owned by McMillin which are subject to this MOU and the
denominator is the total number of units within the City in which the City has lowered the County
Public Facilities Fee. If the County action is only against McMillin with respect to this MOU,
and not against other impacted landowners for which the City has lowered the County Public
Facilities Fee, then McMillin's defense costs shall be 100% of the attorneys' fees and costs for
defense of the litigation. Damages (including the difference in the amount of the City Public
Facilities Fee and the amount of the County Public Facilities Fee paid by Mc to City
pursuant to the terms of this MOU) shall be the responsibility of Mc . To the extent
Mc@ has paid City Public Facilities Fees and/or County Public Facilities Fee to City of which
it is adjudicated are lawfully the funds of County, City shall pay such sums to County and
McMillm shall have such liability for the payment of the difference between such fees reduced by
ttit Pmount paid by the City. City and Mc@ shall mutually agree on legal counsel to be
retained to defend any such action(s) brought by the County as herein provided. City and
Mc@ each reserve the right to withdraw from the defense of the County litigation in the event
the County prevails at the @ level and there is an appeal. If either party withdraws after the
@ and there is an appeal, the remaining party @ pay all the costs and fees associated with said
appeal.
24.2 Public Facilities Fees Shortfall. In the event the County prevails in any
legal action or other proceeding to challenge, set aside, or enjoin the enforcement of this MOU
and a trial court determines that McMillin and/or the City is liable to make up any shortfall
between the amount of the City Public Facilities Fee and the County Public Facilities Fee which
would otherwise have been imposed pursuant to Development Agreement No. 5, then Mc@
shall be responsible for paying any such shortfall subject to City's payment to County of any
amounts collected and held by City under the terms of Development Agreement No. 5. Such
payment by City to County shall reduce Mc@'s liability to County for payment of such fees
by a like amount paid by City.
24.3 County Prevails in Litigation - Severability. In the event the County
prevails at the trial court level against the City or McMillin as described in Section 5.1 of this
MOU, the amount of the City Public Facilities Fee shall revert to the amount of the County Public
Facilities Fee in effect at the time of entry of the final judgment in favor of the County (or such
lesser amount as determined by the Court). In the event this MOU is held to be invalid or
unenforceable by a UW court of competent jurisdiction, McMillin shall thereafter pay the, County
04-15-96 10026-00002 7
S:\DDC\152\96010023.Ml3
Public Facilities Fee as provided in Development Agreement No. 5 (or such lesser amount as
determined by the Court). AR other provisions of this MOU or any subsequent agreements
relating to the Temeku project shall remain valid and enforceable notwithstanding said ruling of
invalidity.
24.4 Third PalU LitiL7ation ConcerninL, MOU. McMillin shall defend, at its
expense, including attorneys' fees, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and
employees from any claim, action or proceeding against City, its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of @ MOU or the approval of any permit granted
pursuant to @ MOU brought by a NW party other than the County. City shall promptly notify
McMillin of any such claims, action, or proceeding, and City shall cooperate in the defense. If
City fails to promptly no@ McMillin of any such claim, action, or proceeding or if City fails to
cooperate in the defense, McMillin shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or
hold harmless City. City may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action,
or proceeding.
24.5 Termination of MOU. If the amended and m=ted Development Agreement
No. 5 is approved by the City Council, this MOU shall terminate upon the effective date of the
ordmance approving the amended and restated Development Agreement No. 5. If the amended
and restated Development Agreement No. 5 is disapproved by the City Council or the voters of
the City, then the obligations of Mc@ under this Memorandum shall terminate and McNfiUin
thereafter shall be subject to the terms of Development Agreement No. 5.
25. Jurisdiction. This MOU is made and entered into in the State of California, and
this MOU, and any rights, remedies, or obligations provided for herein shall be construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
26.Severability. If any portion, provision or part of this MOU is held, determined,
or adjudicatedto be invalid, unenforceable, or void for any reason whatsoever, each such portion,
provision, orpart @ be severed from the remaining portions, provisions, or parts of this MOU
and @ not affect the validity or enforceability of such remaining portions, provisions, or parts.
27.Entire ALreement. This MOU contains the entire understanding and agreement
between the parties hereto with to the matters referred to herein. No other representations,
covenants, undertaidngs or other prior to contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, respecting
such matters, which are not specifically incorporated herein, shall be deemed in any way to exist
or bind any of the parties hereto. The parties hereto acknowledge that each party has not executed
this MOU in reliance on any such promises, representations, or warranty.
28. Construction. This MOU @ not be construed against the party preparing it, but
be construed as if both parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty and ambiguity
shall not be interpreted against any one party.
04-15-96 10026-00002 8
S:\DOC\152\96010023.MI3
29. Amendment of ALyreemol. This MOU shall not be modified by either party by
oral representation made before or after the execution of this MOU. AU modifications must be
in writing and signed by the parties, and each of them.
30. Time of theP-%qmce. Time is of the essence for the perfommce of each and every
covenant and the satisfaction of each and every condition contained in this MOU.
31. No Precommitment. City and Mc understand and agree that cerliin actions
of the City contemplated by this MOU will require compliance with legal procedures, regulations
and public heafings accompanied by discretionary decisions. The parties acknowledge that
nothing contained in this MOU shall be construed as a precommitment to any discretionary
decision or a requirement of the City Planning Commission or City Council to approve any
discretionary actions contemplated in implementing the intent of the parties set forth in this MOU.
32. Counterparta. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original.
IN S F, the executed this Memorandum as of the date set forth
hereinabove.
CrrY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel Lindemans, Mayor
ATTMT: McMELLIN PROJECT SERVICES, INC., a
corporation
June S. Greek, City Clerk
By:
Its:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Its:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
04-15-96 10026-00002 9
S:\DOC\152\96010023.Ml3
ITEN4 29
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR TOR 0
CITY MANA(
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:City Commissioner Term Limits and Monthly Compensation
RECOMMENDATION:Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
1)ORDINANCE NO. 96 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TERM
LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS.
2) ORDINANCE NO. 96 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS.
BACKGROUND: Currently, City Commissioners are limited, by Ordinance 2.40.030, to
serve in no more than two (2) full, consecutive terms which equate to six (6) years. This limit
will be reached by several City Commissioners in the coming year.
This six (6) year, artificially imposed limit, would result in these commissioners being required
to resign their posts. These resignations would result in the City losing a wealth of knowledge
and history regarding various City projects. This could potentially impact the quality of review
that projects currently receive at the commission level.
The role of the Community Service, Planning, and Public Safety/Traffic Commissions is critical
to the ultimate success of the projects that are built in Temecula. By having top notch
commissioners, all residents of the City benefit. In addition, if the commissioners wish to
continue their service beyond six (6) years, and the City Council is satisfied with their
performance and wish to reappoint them, it would be to the community's advantage to allow
these commissioners to continue to serve.
R:@IER.DAaEPOR=AFF29.MIS
In addition, staff has completed a survey of commissioner term lengths and found the majority
of cities in the area, including Chino, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Norco, Rancho
Cucamonga, San Marcos, Escondido, and Vista, do not have term limits.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with term limits. The total cost of
monthly compensation is $12,000. Finally, on March 12, 1996, the City Council directed staff
to compensate commissions as follows:
Planning Commission $1 00 per month
Public Safety/Traffic Commission $50 per month, and
Community Services/Parks Commission $50 per month
This compensation will begin on 07/01/96. This ordinance change is required in order to
accurately reflect the City Councils decision to compensate Commissioners.
R:\LANIER-DAB-EPORT\SrAFF29.MIS 2
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEM[ECULA
ING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE CULA MUNICIEPAL CODE
PERTAWNG TO TERM LBUTS FOR CITY CO SIONERS.
THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings, The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the
following:
A. That there is a need to amend Section 2.40.030 setting term limits for City
Commissioners.
B. Several current Commissioners will be forced to resign unless this ordinance is
amended.
C. The resignation of these Commissioners would result in the City losing a wealth of
knowledge and history regarding various City projects and could potentially impact the quality of
review that projects currently receive at the commission level.
Section 2. Section 2.040.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read:
"Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, or by ordinance or resolution of the city council,
all members of commissions of the city shall, at all times during their incumbencies, be bona fide
residents and registered voters of the city. No member of any commission shall be a city
employee, nor shall any person be a member of more than one commission at any one time".
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\LANIER-DA\REPORT,STAFF29.MIS 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of 1996.
Karel F.. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[S@]
STATE OF CAIJFORNIA)
COUNTY OF I]DE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
forgoing Ordinance No. 96- - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the - th day of _, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on
the -th of 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC ERS:
NOES: COUNC ERS:
ABSENT: COUNC ERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
R:@IEP,DA\REPOR'RSTAFF29.MIS 4
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA
ING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMIECULA MUNICI]PAL CODE
PEKI'ANNG TO MONTHLY CO SATTON FOR CITY CO SIONERS.
THE FOLLOWING COUNC]IL FOR TBE CITY OF CULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings, The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the
following:
A. That the City Council wishes to amend Section 2.40. 100 to provide monthly
compensation for City Commissioners.
B.Monthly compensation for Commissioners includes:
Planning Commission
Public Safety/Tr-affic Commission
Community Services/Parks Commission
$100 per month
$50 per month, and
$50 per month
Section 2. Section 2.040. 100 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read:
"City Commissioners shall receive monthly compensation as follows:
Planning Commission $ 1 00 per month
Public Safety/Traffic Commission $50 per month, and
Community Services/Parks Commission $50 per month."
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:@IEP,DA\P-EPORT,STAFF29.MIS
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ]]DE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 96- - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the - th day of _, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on
the -th of _, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC ERS:
NOES: COUNC ERS:
ABSENT: COUNC ERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
R:\LANIER.DA\REPOR'RSTAFF29.NUS 6
DEPART]N4ENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC'TO
IL_CITY MANAGER'@.,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for March, 1996.
r:\agdrpt\inoactTt/ajp
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
APRIL, 1996 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak@
Prepared by: Don Spagnol
Date:April 23, 199@
1. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. 1-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications:
The contractor began construction on February 12, 1996 and has completely cleared
the site. The contractor is in the process of delivering and compacting the soil for the
northbound off-ramp, replacing the existing drainage channel adjacent to Palm Plaza
with a underground storm drain and grading of the northbound shoulder. The
contractor is scheduled to begin bridge falsework construction immediately after the
placement of concrete barrier rail along the sidewalk on the south side of the bridge.
The project provides for the widening of the Winchester Road Bridge over the 1-1 5
freeway, the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and the construction of
a new northbound loop ramp.
2. Sports Park Parking and Skate Board Park:
The contractor has completed the irrigation system and is working on the final
landscape planting. The remainder of the park improvements are scheduled to be
completed by the end of April, 1996. The park will be opened for public use after the
90-day maintenance period.
3. Fire Station #84:
The contractor has placed concrete for the building foundation and has begun
construction of the masonary walls. Installation of underground conduit and piping
for the building is also underway. The contractor expects to start grading for the
Pauba Road widening during the second week of April. The project is scheduled to
be completed by the fall of 1996. This project includes, new sewers, road
improvements on Pauba Road between the new church site and Margarita Road,
construction of the new fire station and landscaping.
4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project:
Construction began on February 20, 1996 and is scheduled to be completed by
September of 1996. The contractor has placed the concrete for the restroom building
foundation and has begun construction of the masonary walls. Grading is nearly
complete and the landscaping work has started. The improvements include the
construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and restroom facility, asphalt
pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596
Monthly A ctfvity Report
April 23, 1996
Page 2
parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities.
5. Pavement Management System
The contractor has completed all the paving work except for Pala Road, which should
begin the week of April 15, 1996. The remaining work to be done includes striping,
raising manholes to the new pavement elevation, sawcutting and installing new traffic
loops. There are seven (7) roadways that have be rehabilitated, four (4) are arterial,
which includes portions of Margarita Road, Pala Road, Rancho California Road and
Ynez Road, and three (3) are secondary streets at various locations throughout the
City. The project should be completed by May 1, 1996.
6. Walcott Corridor:
The City is in the process of acquiring right-of-way at the intersection of Nicolas Road
and Calle Girasol and accepting the offers of dedication throughout the project for
public street and utility purposes. An appraisal has been completed and an offer for
the land has been given to the property owner. A resolution for the acquisition of the
property and the offers of dedication will be on the City Council agenda for the April
23, 1996 meeting. The project will provide for the realignment of an underground
waterline and a paved road surface on Nicolas Road, Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos,
Walcott Lane and La Serena Way.
7. Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkwu
A complete 4-way traffic signal will be installed as part of the project as well as the
removal of the median island on the south leg of the intersection to provide for a dual
north bound left turn pocket. The agreement between the County of Riverside and
the City for the costs of the design and construction has been executed by the
County. Construction will begin following the installation of the underground storm
drain in the intersection proposed by the County Assessment District (AD 159) Project
which is scheduled for June.
8. Interim Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Pala Road
A contract was awarded to Peek Traffic Inc. on March 12, 1996. This project will
install a 3-way interim traffic signal at Route 79S and Pala Road. The ultimate
improvements will be constructed when the new Pala Road Bridge is constructed and
the highway is widened. A pre-construction meeting is scheduled for April 1 1, 1 996.
The notice to proceed will be issued following the pre-construction meeting.
pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596
Monthly Acdvity Report
April 23, 1996
Page 3
9. Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No.-5
This project is expected to be awarded at the April 23, 1996 City Council meeting.
The project will provide new sidewalk on the north side of Santa Cecilia Drive between
Mira Loma Drive and Cosmic Drive.
10. Barrier Rail on Front St. at Emgire Cme-k
The contractor has completed the barrier rail on both sides of Front Street at Empire
Creek. This project was Federally funded under the Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). This project is designed to install a barrier rail on each
side of Front Street at Empire Creek so that vehicles that deviate from the roadway
will not enter the channel.
11. OUT TO BID
1. Interim Traffic Signal at Route 79S and La Paz Street
Final plans & specifications have been approved by Caltrans and an encroachment has
been issued. The project has been advertised for bid and the bid opening date is April
25, 1996. A 4-way interim traffic signal will be installed as part of the project at the
intersection of Route 79S and La Paz Street. The ultimate signal and striping
improvements will be constructed when the highway is widened.
2. Sgorts Park Creek Restoration
Advertisement for bids began on March 18th and the bid opening is scheduled for
April 1 1, 1996. The project includes the installation of landscaping and gabion slope
protection along the channel slopes to mitigate erosion. Underground drainlines will
be installed to reduce ball field surface ponding. A decomposed granite pathway is
to be constructed along the north channel bank with a concrete walkway adjacent to
the pathway which will bid as an add-alternate.
pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596
Monthly Acdvfty Report
April 23, 1996
Page 4
111.WORK IN DESIGN
1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
This project provides for the widening of the Rancho California Road bridge over the
I- 1 5 freeway and construction of a northbound loop on-ramp. Utility relocations are
being coordinated with Southern California Gas Company and Rancho California Water
District. The County of Riverside is appraising two parcels that are required for the
construction of the northbound exit ramp. The City returned plan check comments
to the consultant the week of March 25, 1996. Final revisions will be made by the
consultant and resubmitted to Caltrans.
2. 1-15/Overiand Drive Overcrossing Improvements
The consultant has revised the roadway and structural plans and resubmitted to
Caltrans the week of March 18, 1996. The consultant will revise the structural plans
when they receive the electrical relocation sheets for the 12 KV and 33 KV power
lines. SCE is currently trying to find a route for the relocation of the 1 1 5 KV power
lines.
3. Cily Wide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS)
Data collection has been completed and the consultant is preparing a discussion paper
for the proposed improvements as well as various options on the available hardware
and software. This project will interconnect all major arterials and will coordinate
traffic signals along the major corridors in the city. This project has been funded by
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds which is a federal funding source
and is administered by Caltrans.
4. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive
The design consultant has submitted plans for first plan check and the City returned
the comments back to the consultant on April 10, 1996. The County Assessment
District 161 Project is proposing to widen Winchester Road from Murrieta Hot Springs
Road to Margarita Road. The street widening project will be detouring traffic from
Winchester Road onto Margarita Road. The traffic signal is expected to be in place
before the traffic is detoured on to Margarita Road which should take place iri'June.
Due to the urgency to install the traffic signal the City is now in the process of
ordering the poles, controller cabinet and controller due to the length of delivery time
for the traffic signal equipment.
pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596
Monthly A ctfvity RePort
April 23, 1996
Page 5
5. Emergency Generat@r.
The project includes installing an emergency generator at the Community Recreation
Center to provide power for emergency operations. A meeting was held on April 1 1,
96 to review the final design revisions with the consultant. The consultant will
revise the plans and will be re-submitting to the City within the next two weeks. Staff
anticipates requesting authorization to solicit public construction bids f rom the Council
in April.
6. Margarita Community Park:
The plans and specifications were submitted for preliminary review on April 3, 1996.
The project includes picnic areas, a tot play area, restroom facilities and open turf
areas. The development of two ball fields on the School Districts property, two
lighted tennis courts, and one lighted roller hockey facility will be bid as add-
alternates.
pwO4\moactrpt\cip\96\apr.mar 041596
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
MARCH 1996
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak@
Prepared by: Steven Cresswell@
Date:April 11, 1996
1. PW93-09 - Parkview Site:
The Record of Survey for the exchanged property and the vacation/dedication of
Pauba Road right-of-way are currently being prepared and processed.
2. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor:
The Consultant is in the process of revising the street improvements and storm drain
plans of Western Bypass Corridor from the bridge to Vincent Moraga Drive and the
improvement plans of Vincent Moraga Drive extension in compliance with the CitV's
and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's (RCFC&WCD)
comments. The right of way dedication documents for Western Bypass Corridor and
Vincent Moraga Drive extension are being amended in compliance with the City's
comments. The Consultant is also analyzing the impacts associated with the location
of the westerly abutment of the Western Bypass Corridor bridge over Murrieta Creek
as it pertains to Metropolitan Water District's (MWD) facilities.
3. PW95-08 - First Street Extension:
RCFC&WCD's consent on the flood study analysis on Murrieta Creek from its
confluence at Temecula Creek upstream to Rancho California Road has been obtained.
The Consultant is designing the street improvements of First Street from the Front
Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection to Western Bypass Corridor including the
bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek. The right of way dedication documents have
been completed.
4. RFP #38 - 6th Street Parking Probect:
The Consultant is preparing the improvement plans for the entire project including the
plans for the public restroom facility and the streetscape improvements. We anticipate
bidding the project in May 1996.
r:%moactrpt%devN96\March
w
CC
s: 0
LU z
LU
Y. C4 r- cm PA I-
X Z .4 C4
0. LLI
ui
CL
(n LLJ U)
0
cc V)
z z to
w w Ut CL
IC04 In
E
C,.
w x
cc
0 C4 q
d C6
F7 It I w 8
z -C
9 ui c; 4* C4,
LU U. in C,4, i fa
C%i cli -C a
0 40 4*
w -i
CC!
co u-
U. co
C4
4* Go
cc
0
0.
w
x W - x -C 61
130 u in C4
w LU C,4 C,4
z S2
v- > 0 U. Ct
> 0 co
x 2 co co CO) qt C,4 46 v
0 C,4
0 CL I- 40 40
(.) U)
LU
U)
z
z ui U) CA 0 Cl)
z M
0 0 w to co
8 RV C4 co CIO*
fa CD Cl) LL V) C,4
ui V) Cl)
0LLI 0.
z
C,44 ICN4 IN
CP)
C3 z
w LLJ is 8 8
> z 0 kn
0 0 cm C,4
0 = 2 CY
0. U) LU 0 4* 40
40
w CL w < ci 0 0)
U. -i U) co -
v qr qr
0 8 qr
z 'CO I- d c4 w
r Z 0 co Ln
CD C'd m C%i tn
Lu 'O Le cli I-
0
M U) 4* 4& 40
2 e ccr CD
0 co co
z
0
U. z 0 z
0 ui ui Z 4 2 2 2 0 2 - g
m w 0 C%i
LLJ -i -
z CL IL) IL LLI ul he z .00
w w 0 IL I- CL 0. 0 ui 0 0 0 0
0 z 0 E 0 - s; 0 0 0 0
w t-
x u ui 0
w (.) LU m 1-
> LU IL i 0 0 0 0
> z co a m w z >
w (L -C CL z
LU lo -C m z U. ui w
0 CL 2 0 2 ui < U. IL z CL 0
MEMORANDUM
TO:@ioseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: April 1, 1996
SUBJECT:Monthly Activity Report - March, 1996
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-
house personnel for the month of March, 1996:
1. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 40
B. Total signs installed 25
C. Total signs repaired 1
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 7
Ill. POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired 189
IV.CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 82
V.RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 12,230
VI.GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 25
B. Total S.F. 6,258
VII.STENCILING
A.220 new and repainted legends
B.130 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - March 1 996
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 28 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 26 service order requests for the month of January, 1996.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 60 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the following
0400 L.F. of new and repainted striping
0 676 L.F. of sand blasting
The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $929.03 compared to $0 for February, 1996.
PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the following
984,451 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $11,420.00 compared to $10,126.R3
for February, 1996.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 1996 was
$60,673.58 compared to $28,911.83 for the month of February, 1996.
Account No. 5402 $ 56,538.58
Account No. 5401 1,690.00
Account No. 999-5402 2,445.00
cc:Steve Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
r:\roads\actrptX96\03 rh
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March.
ACCOUNT NO, 100-164-601-5401
DING@@&@@FA . .....
DATE STREET/CHANNELIBRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/05/96 Ynez @ Empire Creek west Remove existing hardware, hinges and $1,690.00
AND side locks from three (3) swing gates. Weld in
03/06/96 new heavy duty barren hinges and tongue
plate lock latch for clam shell locks.
Includes all material and labor. Does not
include clam locks. Two 80' cleanout
gates.
Total Acct. No. 5401 $1,690.00
ACCOUNT NO, 100-164-601-5402
NELSONPAVING@@&SEALING,@.
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/12/96 31073 Del Rey Road 1 R&R A.C. at edge of pavement $2,851.00
(25'x3' and 4' x l') = 79 sq. Ft.
(4'xl' area is at washed out area)
2.Install 6" A.C. curb 1 1 5 Ln. Ft. east
of downspout and 5 Ln. Ft. west of
downspout = 120' of 6' A.C. curb
3.Excavate area for concrete
downspout to a 2' to l' slope and
install concrete downspout (1 1'x8')
= 88 sq. ft.
4.Backfill area that is wash out
(1 5'x 1 O')
Total A.C. = 7 Tons
L.WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, INC.,:...
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
MARCH/96 Villages Area Class 1 trimmed 317 R.O.W. trees $9,930.00
r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh
W. Go cn qt N 0 0 in 0 In w T- P- cm
z -4 CR w 0 T- 0 co 14 CY) co
o Lu
>- C4 p- 0 p- 0 C,4 0 C4 C4 ei C-i ci
C4 0 in 0) C) Ul) co N N
Pt Vi Pt et @
w 0 L) T- v- tD P- 4w) Ul) C) Re 0) to
cn V) Rt co C4 co CO)
ffi La W) 4& ww
0: C) W) cn cn C) CD gn C) W) CD C,4 0
< CD C,4 CD CD IV CD C4 co p- CD
LLI
>- 4s ui c; c; CT;
co C4 W) 4w) in C,4 C4 to co
U) -J
0 < CL co 4m W) CD p-
-W u CD cq cq IZ 96 VZ C6 CD w
to f, C,4
cn 40 40
E
cn cL
0 CD 0 CD 0 0 CD 14 0 C,4 0 0
U) 0 CD 0 CD CD 0 N c:o to 0 C4 40
z
0 c; c; C5 ti c; c; IZ wi C6 ci
40 C" W) 0 C) w to cc
CD C4 C" C,4 v- W) 4=
o cq VZ cq
W) *V
to 0 CD 0 c:o 0 Ul) CD w
LO CD CD CD CD C,4 0 C,4 t- t- 4= CD
ui z
0 0 c; C5 ci
C,4 C,4 40 CD C) C* LO to cn CD CD w
tn CD N c:i tn C4 m tn cn IV
o cq 40 Ci ww z @ z @
v- 40 40
40
C" CD CD c:o 0 P- co W)
LU C-4 M 0 C,4 CD
U z U.)
W 0
(L C,4
0 CO
u
0
C/)
Ln 0 CD C4 0 t- co 0
to C4 le C'4 co CD C,4 w
I- z N C,4
0 in CD C4
m cq C%i
CL
z cn
0
cr
0
L:
0
U- cm 0
0 m .0 .0
cn m z Co 0
LU co c
cn LU 0 Co co -J m
0
0 It LL LLJ U) z
It L) C) < 0 U)
ui a! EL z LLI cl
cc LU
z
LL,w U,
=) zru.
U) ui rt u :)
0
Cl) -1 ui
EL LL LL L.) LLI _j F- z
LL -1 4
x m it z z cl) a,
< cl < p: ui LU
LU z w Z
z u z z u
0 Co :3 a. w
3: LU a LU 0 ;u 0 6 9
U- z U) z U) z < X
0 - :D E n (n z CZ
LLI (L 0 0 Lu
< n LU R 0 Z z
(L 0 Et :c (D X: IX
I- F- ui LL
z U)
U) (4 - Z U5 U) Cl)
@@1MPLES &:ASSOCIATES:]::::
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/19/96 Commerce Center Drive Remove and replace concrete. $12,521.55
TO
03/21/96 1. Curb & Gutter 215 L.F.
2. Drive Approach 205 S.F.
3. Drive Way 325 S.F.
4. Sidewalk 1,770 S.F.
Total S.F. 2,515
Total P.C.C. 33 Yards
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, @INC.@7
DATE STREET/CHANNELIBRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
MARCH/96 Meadowview Area Class 1 trimmed 457 R.O.W. trees. $18,887.00
Removed and stump grind 1 tree.
Total-Acct. 100-164-601-5402 $44,189.55
ACCOUNT NUMBER 195-180-999-5402
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING......
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/18/96 Calle dapos Grade roads due to rains. $2,445.00
and Calle Girasol
03/19/96 Gatlin Road
Greenwood Lane
John Warner Road
Kimberly Lane
Liefer Road
Lolita Road
Ormsby Road
Pala Vista
Paulita Road
Santiago Road
Walcott Lane
Total Acct. No. 195-180-999-5402 $2,44,5.00
r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh
MAPLES & ASSOCIATES
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/19/96 Commerce Center Drive Remove and replace concrete. $12,521.55
TO
03/21/96 1 - Curb & Gutter 215 L.F.
2. Drive Approach 205 S.F.
3. Drive Way 325 S.F.
4. Sidewalk 1,770 S.F.
Total S.F. 2,515
Total P.C.C. 33 Yards
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.:.
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
MARCH/96 Meadowview Area Class 1 trimmed 457 R.O.W. trees. $18,887.00
Removed and stump grind 1 tree.
Total-Acct. 100-164-601-5402 $44,189.55
ACCOUNT NUMBER 195-180-999-5402
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
03/1 8/96 Calle e@pos Grade roads due to rains. $2,445.00
and Calle Girasol
03/19/96 Gatlin Road
Greenwood Lane
John Warner Road
Kimberly Lane
Liefer Road
Lolita Road
Ormsby Road
Pala Vista
Paulita Road
Santiago Road
Walcott Lane
Total Acct. No. 195-180-999-5402 $2,445.00
r:\roads\actrpt\96\03 rh
LL: LL: LL:
e* m 0) C,4 w 1. to PA C-4 n W 0 V- P.
IA C4 " v- * C,4 fa to PA co on co
C4 It ti It C4 Pt Ci
ri ei a
fa P. co 40 P. I v. so co
IR ko 60 -t
to
p- to C4 0)
4* 4* 4*
ww
to C) In 40 C* ko cm t- 4a CD co 11
C4 C,
'm w -t C4 m V, co tA to 40
't cl Ci @ a;
cm C4 C4 a C4 C4 co V) C4
-M cn
C4 co cm
C4
40
gn m 'o 4D 'O CD CD CD P. co ID 40 C,
44 cm W M M 0. C,
IR OR
a) w
1. co cm t- -C
C4 p- %q t-
w oo ID 4n C4
w
u@.
C)
ui
w
40 CD 40 0) 0 to CD v 0 0 CD .0 co t- in CD m -e cn CD
IR lm " " = o w w w n w C4 C! IR P% Ci
0 CD 't cm ci C4 rt co C4 CD co a) lo
10
co so co
CD pi 40 - cwn
Ci Ct
&o cn 00
C4
ce
0
w CD
PA CD
LU %S CD
LL co
co u: 4) -*
c L4 C."
z
z CO !5 -0 E tA Z
4n .., P- gm F- uj F- UJ to
LLI tD C LL U) CO CO CO) F- c v co
0 . z @ L
0 0 0 CO 0.0 i ;- LL.
C4
CD
-J to 0 0 V5 co
4) CD r.) 0 L)
0) a co a, 0 CD to IM z 0,60 0 -ago
M rj -ci z C? s m Z r-
- -o 4 UJ to ci < t
z = $A r
ul IA
c c 0 U cn 0) cn
I- ui i- c; :E
C)0. 0. c -S 4D c ci
ul tA 0 o LLI LM.LM ii - ii C: v u 0 >. = >.
m o n 0 0 0 U. IX U>,
LL u 0 a (a co F- I- p- F' 0- IL ce b- E5 'U) U) u I- IL 4 U) CD I- LL 0: cc
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
CATCH BASIN CLEANING
WORK COMPLETED
DATE LOCATION
03-05-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Cleaned 24 Basins
03-13-96 Areas #1, & #2. Cleaned 28 Basins
03-1 3-96 Areas #1 #2, #3, & #4. Cleaned 18 Basins
03-14-96 Areas #1, #2, #3, & #4. Cleaned 12 Basins
TOTAL 82
BASINS
CLEANED
pwO3\road\wkcmpltd\96\03.CB 040896
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
DEBRIS
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
03-11-96 Area #1 Loads of Debris 3
03-11-96 Area #1 Bags of Trash 5
03-12-96 Rancho California Road Load of Debris 1
@ Margarita & Meadows
03-13-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Load of Debris 1
03-13-96 Cabrillo @ John Warner Sand Removal 4 Yards
03-14-96 Areas #1, #2, #3 & #4. Load of Debris 1
PWO3\ROADS\WKCMPLTD\96\03.DEBRIS 040896
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
WORKCOMPLETED@
LOCATION
DATE
03-04-96 28859 Pujol Street Removed 100 S.F. of Graffiti
03-05-90- Calle Aranda @ Via Norte Removed 30 S.F. of Graffiti
03-07-96 Empire Creek @ Ynez Road Removed 138 S.F. of Graffiti
03-07-86 Winchester @ San Gertrudes Creek Removed 4 S. F. of Graffiti
03-08-96 Empire Creek @ Ynez Road Removed 25 S. F. of Graffiti
03-11-96 Rancho California Road Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti
@ Moraga Road
03-11-96 Rancho California Road Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti
N/0 Business Park Drive
03-12-96 Pujol Street @ First Street Removed 6 S. F. of Graffiti
03-14-96 Meadows Parkway @ Ranch Water Reservoir Removed 90 S. F. of Graffiti
03-15-96 Community Recreation Center Removed 5 S. F. of Graffiti
03-20-96 Vintage Hills Drive @ Channel Removed 1,078 S. F. of Graffiti
03-21-96 Park @ Ave. del la Reina Removed 48 S.F. of Gri
03-22-96 Long Valley Wash Removed 1,645 S. F. of GratTiti
03-22-96 Solana Way @ Ynez Road Removed 8 S. F. of Graffiti
03-25-96 Rancho California Road @ Removed 128 S. F. of Graffiti
Meadows Parkway
03-25-96 Rancho California Road @ Removed 25 S. F. of Graffiti
Calle Tajo
03-25-96 Humber @ Long Valley Wash Removed E - S. F. of Graffiti
03-26-96 Community Recreation Center Removed 35 S. F. of Graffiti
03-28-96 Hwy. 79 S @ Ave. de Missions Removed 1,228 S. F. of Graffiti
03-29-96 Ynez Road @ Preece Removed 105 S. F. of Graffiti
03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 40 S.F. of Graffiti
@ YI-1 -1
03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 162 S. F. of Graffiti
@ Cosmic
03-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 645 .- S.F. of Graffiti
@ Long Valley Wash
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03. Graffiti 040396
GRAFFITI @OVAL - MARCH 1996
3-29-96 Rancho California Road Removed 76 S.F. of Graffiti
@ Moraga Road
03-29-96 Yukon @ Humber Removed 36 S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL S.F. 6,258
TOTAL
LOCATIONS 25
-2- pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.Graffiti 040396
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
.. .. ...... .
".@@:LO ON@@.. EQUE 1:@WORK. OMPLETE .
DA. -
03-01-96 30151 Santiago Road Water running through 03-01-96
property-
03-04-96 28559 Pujol Street Graffiti 03-04-96
03-04-96 30463 Danube Court Tree trimming 03-04-96
03-04-96 N. Gen. Kearney @ Street repairs 03-04-96
Margarita
03-05-96 30558 Iron Bark Tree trimming 03-05-96
03-05-96 43737 Buckeye Road Sidewalk repair 03-05-96
03-05-96 41399 Ave. de la Reina Plugged storm drain 03-05-96
03-05-96 County Center Drive Potholes 03-06-96
03-06-96 30241 Sierra Madre Pothole 03-06-96
03-06-96 30130 Via de la Mesa 8' Bush blocking sight 03-06-96
03-07-96 31325 Pahuta Street Backyard flooding 03-07-96
03-07-96 31141 Del Rey Road Tree trimming 03-07-96
03-08-96 42078 Sweet Shade Lane Tree trimming 03-08-96
03-08-96 41965 Kaffirboom Court Tree trimming 03-08-96
03-11-96 41588 Big Sage Court Tree trimming 03-11-96
03-11-96 41836 Corte Valentine Street crack in street 03-11-96
03-11-96 41735 Winchester A frame sign missing 03-12-96
03-11-96 41525 Ave. de la Reina Pothole 03-12-96
03-12-96 41854 6th Street Tree trimming 03-12-96
03-12-96 41591 Willow Run Tree trimming 03-13-96
03-13-96 Willow Creek @ Pothole 03-13-96
N.Gen. Kearney
03-13-96 La Corona @ Via Norte Weeds 03-13-96
03-19-96 Liefer Road Grading 03-19-96
03-21-96 41830 Rio Grande Drive Tree trimming 03-21-96
03-22-96 i Rancho Vista Road Litter pick up 03-22-96
pwO3@dsNwkcmpltd\96\03.svsrq 040396
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG - MARCH, 1996
"3-26-96 41884 Borealis Drive Tree removal 03-26-96
03-26-96 45521 Classic Way Tree trimming 03-26-96
03-28-96 45755 Corte Rodrigo Helicopter spraying 03-28-96
TOTAL S.O.R.'S
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03-svsrq 040396
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
SIGNS
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED@
T
03-05-96 Via Renate S/0 Via La Vida Installed 2 N.H.W.S.
03-06-96 Margarita @ Ave. Barca Replaced W-41 "T.C."
03-06-96 Station #83 Installed 2 R-26
03-07-96 Monterey @ Ave. Barca Repaired R-1
03-07-96 Rancho California Road Replaced 2 Delineators
E/O Margarita
03-08-96 Pauba @ Margarita Replaced 2W-17 2W-17A
03-11-96 Pala Road @ Hwy. 79 South Replaced W-1 7 "Faded"
03-11-96 De Portola Road @ Margarita Replaced 4 R-l's "Faded"
03-12-96 Rancho California Road @ Installed Adopt-A-Street Signs (2)
Margarita
03-1 2-96 Rancho California Road @ Installed Adopt-A-Street Signs (2)
Meadows
03-14-96 Rancho California Road Replaced Post and Sleeve for R-7 & R7
@ Town Center
03-18-96 Bedford @ Hwy. 79 South Replaced R-1 "Faded"
03-18-96 Clubhouse @ Bayhill Replaced R-1 "Faded"
03-18-96 Pala Road @ Masters Replaced R-1 "Faded"
03-18-96 Greensboro Drive @ Murfield Replaced R-1 Graffiti
03-18-96 Esmerado Court & Loma Linda Replaced R-1 EGG
03-18-96 Via Gilberto @ End of Street Replaced Type "N" "Faded"
03-1 8-96 Piute @ Huron Replaced 2 R-1 EGG
03-1 8-96 Huron @ Pala Road Replaced R-1 "Faded"
03-18-96 Via Eduardo @ End of Street Installed W-31, W-52, Type "N"
03-18-96 Baiderclay Court @ Felix Valdez Replaced R-1 EGG
03-18-96 Front Street @ Moreno Replaced R-1 "Faded"
03-20-96 Pala Road @ Wolf Valley Road Installed 3 W-1 7 3 W-1 7A
03-21-96 Quiet Meadows @ Ynez Road Replaced 3 'k-1 4 R-lA
R-1 "Faded'
03-25-96 Willow Run @ La Serena Replaced R-1 "Faded'
03-25-96 Las Hacienda @ End of Street-T Replaced W-56 "Faded"
F'WO3\ROADSfWKCMPLTT)\96\03.SIGN\INSTALL 040896
SIGNS - MAIETCH, 1996
3-25-96 Rancho California Road Replaced R-1 "Faded"
@ Business Park Drive
03-25-96 Rancho Way @ Replaced R-1 'Faded"
Business Park Drive
03-25-96 Dos Picos @ Diaz Road Replaced R-1 'Faded'
03-25-96 Rio Nedo @ Diaz Road Replaced R-1 'Faded'
03-25-96 Virgo @ Southern Cross Replaced R-1 EGGED
03-25-96 Mira Loma @ Rancho Vista Replaced 2 Type "K' Markers "T.C.'
03-25-96 Rancho Highland.@ Ynez Road Replaced R-1 'Faded"
03-26-96 Rancho California Road Replaced Type 'N' 'T.C."
@ Moraga Road
03-26-96 Pauba Road E/O La Primavera Replaced Type "N" 'T.C."
03-26-96 Elinda @ Pauba Road Replaced R-1 Graffiti
03-26-96 Pauba Road W/O Replaced W-17 Graffiti
Butterfield Stage
03-26-96 De Portoa Road @ Installed W-1 7
Margarita
TOTAL SIGNS 40
REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS
INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS 1
REPAIRED
PWO3\ROADSIWKCMPL'rD\96\03.SIGN\INSTALL 040896
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
STENCILING
FDATE LOCATION. WORK COMPLETED
03-04-96 Sixth Street @ Pujol Painted 65 L.F. of Rec :urb
03-11-96 Sixth Street @ Pujol Painted 65 L.F. of Red Curb
03-20-96 Pala Road @ Wolf ValleyRoad Installed 20 New Legends
03-21-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 56 Legends
03-26-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 57 Legends
03-27-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 45 Legends
03-28-96 Area #1 (See Daily) Repainted 42 Legends
TOTALLEGENDS 220
REPAINTED &
INSTALLED
TOTAL L.F. OF 130
RED CURB
INSTALLED
PWO3\ROADS\WKCMPLTD\96\03.STENCIIL 040496
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
TREE TRIMMING
DATE LOCATION
F I @ @ I I @: WORK@ COMPLETED
03-11-96 Area 1 Trimmed 2 Trees
03-13-96 Cabrillo @ John Warner Removed 1 Fallen tree
03-18-96 Front Street S/0 Removed 1 Tree
Rancho California Road W/S
03-18-96 Classic Drive @ Murfield Trimmed 1 Tree
03-18-96 35302 Esplendor Court Trimmed 1 Tree
03-25-96 Dos Picos @ Diaz Road Trimmed 1 Tree
TOTAL TREES
TRIMMED 7
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.TrR 040496
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
MARCH, 1996
WEEDS & DEBRIS
......... ..
LOCA ION OMPLETF-D@
IbAi c
03-11-96 Area 1 Abated 12,130 S.F.
03-13-96 Via Norte @ La Corona Weed Removal 100 S.F.
TOTAL S.F. 12,230
R.O.W. WEED
ABATED
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\03.Weeds 040896
TRAMC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For March, 1996
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Martin Lauber 401?
Date: April 9, 1996
TRAFFIC RF-QlJlF-'qTv, and PLAN CHECKS
C REQMTS. JAN FEB
Received 8 11
Completed 8 8
Active 31 34
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 4 @4
WORK ORDERS ISSUED. 2 5
STRIPING@ PLANS REVIEWED 1 1 2
@.ICCONTROI-PLANSREVIEV;ED 0 0 @@@4
TRAFFIC IMPACT@ STUDIES RE D 6
DIVISION PROJECTS*
A.A new striping plan was designed in-house for Ynez Road from Santiago Road to Rancho
Vim Road. We are able to take advantage of the re-@cing operation to completely change
striping to accommodate additional protected left turn pockets. The portion of Margarita
Road between Via La Vida and Moraga Road was also re-striped to add center left tam lanes.
B .The Radar Trailer Display Unit was transferred to the Police Department's Traffic Division
for implementation. Public Works staff is worldng closely with our Police Department
regarding placement. The police will be able to greatly increase the visibility of this
equipment.
c .The entire Old Town street lighting system has been reviewed for deficiencies. All system
short comings have been repaired to create a fully functioning system. This is the only public
street lighting system currently maintained by Public Works.
R.\IAOA Ck96\03.MAR-rh
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Building and Safety March 1996, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for March, 1996.
Building Permits Issued 131
Building Valuation $11,737,641
Revenue Collected $125,898
Housing Starts 97
New Commercial Starts 3 87,232 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations 13 24,907 Sq.Ft.
Building Inspections 2,468
Valuation FY Year-to-Date 87,752,717
Code Enforcement Actions 847
Active Cases Pending 50
Closed Cases 31
V:\W@@da\March'96.Rpt
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
I DIRECTOR OF FINANQE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Managi
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:Receive and File
Discussion:The following is a summary of the Community Development
Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for
the month of February 1996:
Caseload Activitys
The Department received ten (8) applications for administrative cases and nine (5) applications
for public hearing cases for the month of February.
The following are the public hearing cases:
Conditional Use Permit 1
General Plan Amendment 1
Plot Plan subj to CEQA 1
Temporary Use Permit 1
Plot Plan w/CEQA 1
TOTAL 5
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Proiect* The Sixth Street Parking Lot Master Plan.
Webb & Associates will be designing the offsite improvements and standards for the
related components of the project. These will be used as design standards for off-site
improvement in Old Town, along with the Old Town Streetscape Standards and was
approved by the City Council at the March 12, 1996. The anticipated ground breaking
for the 6th Street project is June 8, 1996.
Murdy Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Rep= The draft Specific Plan
and draft EIR have been submitted. Staff is conducting a review and will provide
comments to the applicant.
R:\MONTHLY.RM1996 CH.WPD 4/15196 vgw
Johnson Ranch Spec*fic Plane Staff has sent a second letter to the applicant requesting
to withdraw their application from the City.
Raripaugh Ranch Specif*c Plans The Planning Commission held a public workshop on
September 11, 1995 and directed the applicant to reduce the density and the total
number of units as well as to be more sensitive to the surrounding land use by
increasing the buffer area and providing a transition of lot sizes. The Commission
provided additional direction to the applicant. No future hearing date has been
established.
Temecula Shuttle* Located along Front Street within the 6th Street public parking lot,
this project includes construction of a 1860 square foot building, 4 bus spaces and
public seating areas within landscaped areas. This project was approved at the February
22, 1996 Director's Hearing. The anticipated ground breaking is set for June 1996.
School lml2act Mitoaation Plane DMG & Associates have completed their evaluation of
the School District Mitigation Plan. Staff has prepared a school facility impact model
to help assess the need for and cost of additional school facilities. Anticipated
Proposition 203 funds have been included into the model. A copy of the DMG Study
and the City's Model have been sent to the district and building industry.
Annexation Guedelinesl The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines at their
March 18, 1996 meeting. It will be scheduled for the City Council's consideration in
May 1996.
Soon Ordin The sign committee members were appointed by the City Council in
March. The first meeting was held on April 2, 1996. The next meeting is scheduled for
April 30, 1996. At the first meeting, staff presented a slide show for the committee.
At the second meeting the committee will be evaluating signs in different parts of
Temecula.
Attachment:
1 . Revenue and Status Report - Page 3
R:\MONTHLY.RPIR1996 CH.WPD 4/15196 vgw
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:\MONTHLY.RFnl996 CH.WPD 4/15/96 vgw 3
REVPRIN2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
04/15/96 11:23:24 REVENUE STATUS REPORT
MARCH 1996
001 GENERAL FUND
161 PLANNING
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1995-96 BALANCE % COL
ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE
4101 AMENDED FINAL MAP
4102 APPEALS
4103 CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
4104EXTENSION OF TIME
4105SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS
4106MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS
4107PARCEL MAPS
4108LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
4109MINOR CHANGE
4110PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
4111RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS
4112REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
4113SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
4114SECOND UNIT PERMITS
4115CHANGE OF ZONE
4116CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
4117CONSISTENCY CHECKS
4118GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4119PLOT PLAN
4120PUBLIC USE PERMIT
4121REVISED PERMIT
4122SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
4123SPECIFIC PLAN
4124SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
4125TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
4126TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
4127VARIANCE
4128ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
4129CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES)
4130CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT
4131DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
4132GEOLOGY CEQA
4133GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ
4134LAFCO
4135PARCEL MAP/WAIVER
4136MERGER
4137AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP
4138CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
4139CONDO TRACT MAP
4140REVERSION TO ACREAGE
4141LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
4142LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
4143CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK
4144CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK
4145COND. CERT. OF COMPL. PLN. CK.
4146CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK
.00 .00 .00 .00
325.00 .00 325.00 .00 100.0
800.00 356.00 756.00 44.00 94.5
6,000.00 268.00 3,100.00 2,900.00 51.7
6,850.00 .00 6,853.00 3.00- 100.0
5,332.00 .00 .00 5,332.00 0.0
8,996.00 .00 2,616.00 6,380.00 29.1
1,380.00 230.00 2,070.00 690.00- 150.0
940.00 .00 918.00 22.00 97.7
1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
392.00 .00 .00 392.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
520.00 .00 .00 520.00 0.0
13,256.00 .00 10,984.00 2,272.00 82.9
29,248.00 3,777.00 9,509.00 19,739.00 32.5
4,440.00 .00 .00 4,440.00 0.0
4,827.00 .00 8,415.00 3,588.00- 174.3
57,190.00 5,650.00 26,547.00 30,643.00 46.4
10,765.00 .00 8,004.00 2,761.00 74.4
6,446.00 .00 3,725.00 2,721.00 c'-g
1,250.00 .00 500.00 750.00
9,254.00 .00 590.00 8,664.00
1,715.00 370.00 4,208.30 2,493.30- 245.4
2,548.00 191.00 818.00 1,730.00 32.1
.00 .00 .00 .00
1,142.00 .00 571.00 571.00 50.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 1,732.00 10,622.65 10,622.65-
6,202.00 609.75 6,811.75 609.75- 109.8
4,000.00 .00 8,000.00 4,000.00- 200.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 500.00 500.00-
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
784.00 .00 .00 784.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
REVPRIN2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
O/ '96 11:23:24 REVENUE STATUS REPORT
MARCH 1996
GENERAL FUND
161 PLANNING
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MARCH 1995-96 BALANCE % COL
ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE
4147 VACATIONS PLAN CK .00 .00 .00 .00
4148 DOCUMENT PROCESSING .00 .00 .00 .00
4149 CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4150 REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4151 PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4152 TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4153 AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4154 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS .00 .00 .00 .00
4155 FEMA STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4156 LOMA REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4157 DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4169 IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE .00 .00 .00 .00
4170 K-RAT STUDY FEES 1,480.00 .00 .00 1,480.00 0.0
4175 FAST TRACK PLANNING .00 .00 .00 .00
4180 FORMA FAST TRACK .00 .00 .00 .00
4200 IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS 10,045.00 960.00 7,150.00 2,895.00 71.2
4206 ANNEXATION FEES 710.00 .00 .00 710.00 0.0
4226 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT .00 .00 .00 .00
4260 ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY .00 .00 .00 .00
4261 LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE .00 .00 .00 .00
42-k' HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY .00 .00 .00 .00
LAND DIV UNIT MAP 748.00 .00 187.00 561.00 25.0
4- LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK .00 2,245.25 13,407.75 13,407.75-...
PLANNING 198,585.00 16,389.00 137,188.45 61,396.55 69.1
A -ril 16, 1996
,L ILF
Note to Council Packet:
City Attorney Peter Thorson was unable to review the entire Council packet this week, due to the
very serious illness of a member of his immediate family. He asked me to advise you that he
reviewed all of the pertinent legal matters with staff, prior to the preparation of the staff reports
and feels comfortable they are in order from that standpoint.
Ju@.@eek, CMC
City Clerk