The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About051496 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD MAY 14, 1996 - 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session @of the City Council\Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to GovernmentCodeSections: 1. 54956.8,CONFERENCE'WITHREALPROPERTYNEGOTIATOR,@realpropertylocatedat 28535 Puiol Street (APN 922-054-004) and 28545 P ol Street JAPN 922-054-005), Temecula. Ui The negotiating parties are.@@ Temecula @Redevelopment Agency@ and Eli@abeth Otto. Under negotiation will be the price and terms of payment for the real property. 2. 54956.9(a), exi@ting@@litigatibn,@ Emtt/Hox sev City of Temecula et al 3. 54956.9(a), @existing"litigation, Strachota@ Insurance Agency v. Cit of Temecula et a[, 4. 54956.9(a), existing@iltigation, I @Lockeed/Ma in v. of Temecula, et al,@ At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 96-10 Resolution: No. 96-58 CALL TO ORDER:Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding Invocation:Pastor Troy Shedeed, New Covenant Fellowship Center Prelude Music:Rachael Wunsch Flag Salute:Councilmember Ford R:%Agend.\061496 1 ROLL CALL:Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PRESENTATIONS/Proclamation - "California Bike Commute Day" PROCLAMATIONSProclamation - "Transit Appreciation Day" Proclamation - 'Stand for Children Day' PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or are listed on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 0) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:@e.da%06 1 496 2Approval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Approve the minutes of April 23, 1996. 3Resolution Agprovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4City Treasurer's Rel2ort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1 996. 5Records Destruction ADproval RECOMMENDATION: 5.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 6Acceptance of Proposal for Audit Services for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 1 996@ 1 997 and 1998 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1Accept the proposal from Moreland & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, to provide audit services for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1 996, 1997, and 1 998. 7Purchase of Computers for Temecula Police Department RECOMMENDATION: 7.1Authorize the Temecula Police Department to purchase eight computers and monitors from Jaguar Computer Systems for a total price of $1 5,499.00. R:\Agenda\061496 3 8Fundina for the Temecula Libmu RECOMMENDATION: 8.1Appropriate funds in the amount of $2,500 from General Fund Reserves to the City Council Department Budget for expenditure to fund the payroll augment for the Temecula Library through June 30, 1996. 9Aoprove Improvement Fundina Aareement for Cost Participation in the Installation of a Traffic Sianal at the Intersection of Winchester and Roripauah Roads RECOMMENDATION: 9.1Approve Improvement Funding Agreement participating in a portion of the cost of installation and construction of Traffic Signal Improvements at the intersection of Winchester Road and Roripaugh Road; 9.2Appropriate approximately $83,000 from the unappropriated balance of the Signal Mitigation Impact Fees account. 9.3Authorize the Mayor to execute agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District and the County of Riverside; 9.4Direct the City Clerk to so notify the County of Riverside and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. 1 0Summary Vacation of Existing Re-tricted Access Alona the Northerly Side of Solana Way West of Motor Car Parkway on Parcel 5 of the Parcel Mal2 No. 23354 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1Adopt a resolution entitied: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING A THIRTY (30) FOOT WIDE PORTION OF AN EXISTING RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF SOLANA WAY AND WESTERLY ADJACENT TO MOTOR CAR PARKWAY ON PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP 23354 R:%Ag.r,da\061406 4 Accept the Grant of Easement for Public Street and Utility Purposes at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasof for the Walcott Corridor Pro.ject PW94-10 RECOMMENDATION: 1 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES AT THE INTERSECTION OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL FOR THE WALCOTT CORRIDOR 1 2 "No Parkina" Zones on Puiol Street South of First Street RECOMMENDATION: 12.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON PUJOL STREET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'A" 1 3Approve Professional Services Aareement for City Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory and Appropriation of Funds RECOMMENDATION: 13.1Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Darnell and Associates, Inc. to provide traffic engineering services for the implementation of a City Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory for an amount not to exceed $40,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 13.2Appropriate $40,000 from the unreserved General Fund to the Traffic Division Consulting Services Account No. 100-164-602-5248. R:\Agenda\061496 6 14Award of Contract for the Construction of an Interim Traffic Sianal at the Intersection of State Route 79 (S). and La Paz Street - Project No. PW95-13 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1Approve the construction plans and specifications for Project No. PW95-13, Interim Traffic Signal at the intersection of State Route 79(S), and La Paz Street; 14.2Award a contract for the construction of an interim Traffic Signal at the intersection of State Route 79(S) and La Paz Street, Project No. PW95-13 to DBX, Inc., in the amount of $84,036 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 14.3Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,403.60 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 1 5Substitute Subdivision Imi2rovement Aareement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 241 3 -@ (Located northeasterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road) RECOMMENDATION: 1 5.1Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, Subdivision Monumentation Bond, Traffic Signal Mitigation Agreement and Bond, and Fire Protection Mitigation Agreement in Tract No. 24136- 1 ; 1 5.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. 1 6Aareement Reaardina Prol2osed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of Fish and Game and the Cit)( ot Temecula - Western Bypass Corridor Bridae over Murrieta Creek RECOMMENDATION: 1 6.1Approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification No. 5-441-95) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign the Agreement. R:@ger,da\061496 6 1 7Release Warranty Security and authorize Quitclaim of Remainina Parcel in Parcel Mal2 No. 22629 (Located Northeasterly of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 1 7.1 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Security for street and drainage improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629; 17.2Authorize Quitclaim of Parcel 2 and Lot "D"; 1 7.3Authorize the Mayor to execute the deed and direct the City Clerk to have the deed recorded, and so notify the Developer. 1 8Award of Contract for FY95-96 Cit)twide P.C.C. Repairs Proiect No. PW96-06 RECOMMENDATION: 1 8.1Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW96-06 to Chino Construction in the amount of $36,066.50 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 1 8.2Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $3,606.65 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 19Completion and Accel2tance of the Construction of FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project, Proiect No. PW95-18 RECOMMENDATION: 1 9.1Accept the construction of FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW95-1 8; 1 9.2File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 1 9.3Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 20All-Way "Stop" Controls in Starliciht Ridge RECOMMENDATION: 20.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP' CONTROLS (COSMIC DRIVE AT SANTA CECILIA DRIVE, SANTA CECILIA DRIVE AT AGENA STREET, AGENA STREET AT COSMIC DRIVE) R:%Agenda\061496 7 21Adiustment of Certain Costs Related to Weed Abatement RECOMMENDATION: 21.1Authorize staff to adjust the annually established per parcel administrative costs related to the abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant parcels within the City boundaries, when: Written request is made to the Building Official; Two or more abated parcels are contiguous; 1)Up to three (3) contiguous parcels: One (1) administrative fee to be charged. 2)Four (4) or more contiguc- - parcels: One (1) administrative fee to be charged per four (4) parceis The contiguous parcels are under the same ownership. 220012osition to AB 3053 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OPPOSING AB- 3053, WHICH WOULD BAR THE CITY FROM GENERATING NEW DEVELOPMENT REVENUES 23Invitation from the Cit)t of Voorbura RECOMMENDATION: 23.1Authorize the Mayor to attend ceremonies in Voorburg on behalf of the City of Temecu!a. 24Emerciency Purchase of Two File Servers RECOMMENDATION: 24.1Approve emergency purchase of tw, o (2) file servers. R:@enda\051496 a SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 25Second Readinci of OrdinLance No. 96-08 RECOMMENDATION: 25.1Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TERM LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS 26Second Readina of Ordinance No. 96-09 RECOMMENDATION: 26.1Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING R:\Ag.nda\061496 9 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance-, No. CSD 96-01 Resolution:No. CSD 96-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberts ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the re@r CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Approve the minutes of April 23, 1996. 2Release of Bonds for Nicolas Road Landscapina - Coscan Homes California, Inc. (Located at Nicolas Road near North General Kearny Road) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Authorize the City Clerk to release the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for the construction of Nicolas Road Landscaping - Coscan Homes California, Inc. R:@genda\061496 10 3Award of Contract for Construction of North/South Restroom Facility (Project No, PW96- 07CSal RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the North/South Restroom Facility, Project PW96-07CSD. 3.2Award a construction contract in the amount of $26,572.00 to Mahr Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract. 3.3Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $2,657.20 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 3.4Transfer $29,229.20 from Pala Community Park Project, account number 210-190- 1 20-5804 to the Rancho California Sports Restroom Renovation Project account number 210-190-146-5804. 4Desian Services Contract - Americans with Disabilities Act Park Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 4.1Award contract of $10,450 to The Alhambra Group for the preparation of the schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Park Improvement Project. DISTRICT BUSINESS 5TCSD Prooosed Rates and Charaes for FY 1 996-97 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS O'-- THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 8:@ge.da\061 496 1 1 GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 28, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:\Ager,da\061496 1 2 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance:No. RDA 96-01 Resolution:No. RDA 96-11 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Approve the minutes of April 23, 1 996. 2Amendment to Lease Aareement with Donna L. Reeves Trust RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Approve as to form an amendment to the Lease Agreement with Donna L. Reeves Trust and authorize the Executive Director and Agency Attorney to execute the amendment. R:@e@\061496 1 3 AGENCY BUSINESS 3Purchase Aareement for 28535 and 28545 Puiol Street RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "REVISED AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 28, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:\Age,Aa\061496 1 4 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Next i; Order: Resolution No.: No. FA 96-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item = listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address, CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1Approve the minutes of April 23, 1996. 2Second Readina of Ordinance No. FA 96-01 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 28, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:@e@\061498 1 6 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 27Plannina Api2lication No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 1 99-Zonina Amendment "Chardonnay Hills" RECOMMENDATION: 27.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0027 (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMENDMENT) INCREASING THE RANGE OF HOUSING SIZES TO 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 10, 11 AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) 27.2Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0027, AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO ALLOW HOUSING SIZES TO A MAXIMUM OF 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 1 0, 1 1, AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) R:@enda\061496 1 6 28Annexation Guidelines for City of Temecula RECOMMENDATION: 28.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0125 ADOPTING ANNEXATION GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNCIL BUSINESS 29Ordinance Regardina Prima Facie Speed Limits on Rancho California Road between Diaz Road and Moraaa Road RECOMMENDATION: 29.1Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN DIAZ ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD 30Ordinance Reaardina Prima Facie Speed Limits on Margarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: 30.1Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD R:@er,d.\061498 1 7 3 1 School Mitiaation Fees RECOMMENDATION: 31.1Direct staff to schedule a joint City Council/School District meeting to discuss school mitigation fees. 32Acceptance of Easement-for Future Trail (Pechanaa Creek) RECOMMENDATION: 32.1Direct staff to record the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate easement documents across the southerly portion of lots 32-34; 38-48; and lot 53 within Tract No. 1 9872-0 for purposes of securing a future recreational trail along Pechanga Creek. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 28, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R;@erida%061496 1 8 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS The Cify of Temecula PROCLAMATION REAS, California is celebrating California Bike Commute 1996; and the Western Rierside Council of Governments desires to participate with local governments, employers and the Bicycle Commuter Coalition of the Inland Empire in advocating bicycling as a viable transportation alternative; and Vi7HEREAS, Commuting to wor]L by bicycle contributes to improved air qualitt and helps to reduce traffic congestion as well as builds physical fitness and stamina, resulting in more productive employees for the Inland Empire; and VVTHEREAS, Commuting to work by, bicycle is one of the most energy, efficient forms of transportation and @es about the s,&me,&mount of time as any other five mile or less commute; and NMEREAS, The Bicvcle Commuter Coalition of the Inland Empire is a non- profit organization committed to m@ bicycling a mfe and viable commuting alternative; NOW, THEREFORE, 1, @l F. Lindeman&, on behalf of the City Council of the CitT of Temecula, hereby proclaim May 16, 1996 to be,, r>v -gay IN SS NMEREOF, I have hereunto set m-y hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 14th day of May, 1996. @l F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Ile City of Temecula PROCLAMATION REAS, the Nafion is celebrating National Try Transit Wee]L from May 13, to 17,1996; and REAS, Tr@t in e, viigd component of the fabric of itociett both nationally- and in Temec@ CaMornitL; and WHEREAS, Transit helps conserve energy,, reduce pollution, and relieve congestion in our City and State; and REAS, Transit Provides mot@ for all, inclujing the young, old, disaled and poor who depend upon it; and REAS, The Riverside Transit Agency in prove" safe, clean, efficient and effective service for the people of Teme@ CaMornia; NOW, THEREFORE, I, @l F. Lindemans, on behalf of the City Council of the Ci@ of Temecula, hereby proclaim May 15, 1996 to be, fl@ Oayll IN SS REOF, I have hereunto set my @d and @sed the Seal of the CitT of Teinecula to be affixed this 14th da-y of May,, 1996. @l F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Gree]L, CMC City Cler]L nril_ .1 ne City of Temecula PROC ATION S, on June 1, 1996, Americans from all backgrounds will come together to take a 'Stand For Children- at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. and the Temecula Sports Park, and renew our community's commitment to improving the quality of our children's lives; and AMEREAS, on Stand For Children Day and beyond, families, cifimns, members of religious congregations, schools, community-based organizations, businesses, and political and cultural groups will join together as a local and national community to recognize our children's unmet needs and rededicate ourselves to addressing them; and w caring for our children must be our families', community's, and nation's first priority; andAS, the City of Temecula is a firm supporter of Alternatives to Domestic Violence; and WHEREAS, this commitment must begin at the local level-where children and families live and work and have the potential to thrive, and where all citizens, working together, can make a difference in our children's Hves, NOW, THEREF'ORE, I, Karel F. Lindemans, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim June 1, 1996 as: "STAND FOR CHI]LDREN DAY" in the City of Temecula and urge all cifimns to support this day through their presence at the Temecula Sports Park on June 1, 1996, and by dedicating ourselves to the task of improving the quality of life for all our children and leaving no child behind, for all of our children from this day forward. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITE1\4 I z ITEI\4 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Karel F.Lindemans presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Steven Leinhos, New Community Lutheran Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Lindemans presented Certificates of Appreciation to the Arts Council of the Temecula Valley, the Rancho Temecula Area Woman's Club and the Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club for their generous donation of a piano keyboard instrument to be used at the Community Recreation Center. Dr. Jerry Novotney accepted for the Arts Council, Barbara Affolter accepted for the Woman's Club and Joan Sparkman accepted for the Rotary Club. Mayor Lindemans proclaimed the month of May to be "National Nurses Month." Kim Moreno, Branch Manager of the Ramon Visiting Nurses Association thanked the Council for the proclamation. Mayor Lindemans made a presented a Certificate of Appreciation for Mayor Bas Eenhoorn of Voorburg, Holland to Ad Creemers who accepted on behalf of Mayor Eenhoorn. At the request of Councilmember Stone, a presentation was made by Citizens for a Safer Temecula on upcoming seminars they are planning for the community. Ruth Davada, representing the group, invited the public to attend meetings on May 7, 1996 and May 9, 1996 in the Community Center located at 28816 Pujol Street. She stated this group will focus on modifying child molestation laws and focusing on protection of children. Minutes\4\23\96 -1- 05/07196 City Councel Minutes April 23, 1996 PUBLIC COMMENTS Teresa Kolbas and Melody Brunsting, representing the Temecula Balloon and Wine Festival, thanked the City Council for their support and presented them with a package of souvenirs. ITEM ADDED ON THE BASIS OF SUBSEQUENT NEED Councilmember Ford requested that the RCHCA Implementation Agreement of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Plan be added tc. the agenda based on subsequent need in that the need for a commitment from the City of Temecula arose after the printing and posting of the agenda. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to place this item on the agenda. The motion was unanimously carried. l.a.RCHCA Implementation Agreement of Riverside County Conservation It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve direction to authorize Councilmember Steve Ford to act on behalf of City Council as in his judgement is most appropriate. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Stone, Lindemans NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None CITY COUNCIL REPO= Councilmember Ford requested the City Council recognize Water Awareness Month in connection with Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District. He also reported that on June 1, 1 996, a group called 'Stand for Children" will hold a rally at the Lincoln Memorial. Councilmember Roberts suggested that members of the community take Winchester Road and go the back way to Lake Skinner for the Balloon and Wine Festival to avoid congestion. Councilmember Stone requested that he be allowed to use no more than 10 hours of City Attorney time regarding laws that protect criminals instead of protect innocent people. Council consensus was obtained. Councilmember Birdsall requested staff contact the League of California Cities to determine what actions are being taken in regard to legislation aimed at the protection of children. Minutes\4\23\96 -2- 05/07196 City Council Minutes Ar)rol 23, 1996 RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 8:04 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:16 PM. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmembers Birdsall and Stone stated they would abstain on Item No. 2. Mayor Lindemans stated staff requested pulling Item No. 9 for further clarification. Councilmember Ford requested the removal of Items 1 0 and 1 1 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item No. 19. Councilmember Stone requested the removal of Item No. 1 6. City Manager Bradley introduced Gregory W. Stepanicich, Managing Partner of Richards, Watson and Gershon, Attorneys at Law, the firm which will be representing the City of Temecula. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-8, 12-15, 17, 18 and 20-23. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 1Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes\4\23\96 -3- 05/07/96 City Councel Minutes April 23, 1996 2.Approval of Minutes 2.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone 3.Resolution Approvina List of Dema@ RECOMMENDATION: 3.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4.Cit)( Attorne)t Services 4.1Retain Peter Thorson as City Attorney for the City of Temecula; 4.2Terminate the Agreement for City Attorney Services with Burke, Williams & Sorensen Attorneys dated September 26, 1995; 4.3Enter into an Agreement for City Attorney Services With Richards, Watson and Gershon Attorneys at Law. 5Purchase of Radio System Equipment 5.1Approve the purchase of City Radio Equipment from Comtronix of Hemet for a total cost of $17,265.37. 6Records Destruction Approval 6.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Minutes\4\23\96 -4- 05/07/96 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 7.Accept the Offers of Dedication for Public Street and Utility Purposes along the Walcott Corridor 7.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES 8.Sewer Aareement with Mervyn's for Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridae Widenina and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 8.1Approve the Agreement and Grant of Easement, and authorize the Mayor to execute both documents. 12.Prociram Supplement No. 008 to the Local Aaency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for the Barrier Rail at Front Street and Empire Creek (PW95-1 71 12.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLX-5459(007), BARRIER RAIL AT FRONT STREET AND EMPIRE CREEK 1 3.Award of Contract for the Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5. Proiect No. PW95-25 13.1Award a contract for the construction of the Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5, project No. PW95-25 to Gosney Development, for $27,430.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 13.2Authorize the City manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,743.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Minutes\4%23\96 05/07/96 City Counc*l Monutes Aprol 23, 1996 14.Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Pala Road Bridge over Temecula Creek 14.1Approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification No. 5-004-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign said Agreement. 1 5.Construction Cooperative Agreement, State of California, County of Riversode, City of Temecula - 1-1 5/SR @ 1 5.1Approve the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the State of California, County of Riverside and City of Temecula, Route 1-1 5/SR 79(S) Interchange South Junction, Agreement No. B-932, 08303-350510. 17.Release Grading Security for Export of Soils (Located at the southeast corner of Winchester Road at Margarita Road) 17.1Authorize release of the Grading Security for export of soils materials from the Southeast corner of Margarita Road at Winchester Road to several sites along the northerly side of Wincnester Road between Margarita Road and Nicolas Road; 17.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 1 8.Aooroval of Agreement Regarding Transfer of Drainage Facilities to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Located at Ynez Road northerly of Motor Car Parkway) 18.1Approve the agreement between Advanced Cardiovascular Systems ("ACS"), the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ("DISTRICT"), and the City of Temecula ('CITY") for transfer of Drainage Facilities to the DISTRICT; 18.2Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 18.3Direct the City Clerk to attest thereto and to transmit the document to the DISTRICT for final processing through the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Minutes\4\23\96 -6- 05/07/96 City Council irlytes Apr*l 23, 1996 20.Acceptance of Drainaae Easement in Portion of Tract 22916-3 and Quitclaim to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Located Northwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road) 20.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES MADE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (PORTION OF LOTS 62 AND 63 IN TRACT NO. 22916-3) 21.Amendment to Staff Reports Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Sicinal at the Intersection of Margarita Road and State Route 79 (South), Project No. PW95-15 21.1Appropriate $45,000 in Signal Mitigation Funds from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital Improvement Project Fund. 22.Sul2port of AB 3382 22.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING AB 3382 WHICH REINSTATES LOCAL CONTROL OF CONCURRENT FUEL AND ALCOHOL SALES AT ONE LOCATION Minutes\4\23\96 -7- 05/07/96 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 9.Solicitation of Construction Bids and A1212roval of the Plans and Specifications for the Interim Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive - Project No. PW96-03 Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report adding a recommendation to authorize $12,384.37 from Traffic Signal Mitigation Funds. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation as amended: 9.1Approve the construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW96-03, Traffic signal installation at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive. 9.2 Authorize expenditure of $12,384.47 from Signal Mitigation Funds. The motion was unanimously carried. The Council agreed by unanimous consensus to consider Items No. 10 and 1 concurrently. 10.Program Supl2lement No. 001 to the Local Agency/State Aareement for Federal-Aid Promects for SR 1 5 and Overland Drive Overcrossing Project (PW 95-1 1) 1 1.Proaram SuQplement No. 002 to the Local Agency/State Aareement for Federal-Aid Proiects for SR 1 5 and Rancho California Road Interchange Improvement Project (PW 95-1 2) Councilmember Ford stated that the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee met last Thursday to review the report on Rancho California Road Widening and Overland Overcrossing. He stated that the report recommended to proceed with Rancho California Road Widening as being most effective and not in favor of Overland Overcrossing which does not connect into any main roads. He stated this also secures State funding which is available for the Rancho California Road widening project. Minutes\4\23\96 05107/96 City Council Minutes Ar)r*l 23, 1996 It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendations on Items 10 and 1 1 as follows: 10.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001, TO LOCAL AGENCYISTATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(001), SR 15/OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING 11.1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR STATE PROJECT NUMBER SLTPP-5459(002), SR15/RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The motion was unanimously carried. 16.Authorize Cost Participation with Temecula Valley Unified School District for the Installation of a Traffic Sianal at the Intersection of Winchester and Roripauah Roads Councilmember Stone asked why this signal has become a priority. Public Works Director Kicak answered that the urgency of this project is due to potential cost savings by installing the signal during the Winchester Road Widening Project. This action will avoid additional cost and disruption of that intersection which would occur at a later date. Councilmember Stone asked if the School District has participated in the cost of this signal. Mr. Kicak answered that the School District has participated in a portion of 33% of the total cost, and stated he feels that the impact made by the new high school will be less than 33%. Minutes\4\23\96 -9- 05/07/96 City Council M4nutes- Aor*l 23, 1996 It was moved by Mayor Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 16.1Authorize participation in the cost of a Traffic Signal Installation with Temecula Valley Unified School district to be constructed as a portion of the Winchester road Widening Project in the amount of two-thirds of the estimated cost to design and construct the signal. The motion was unanimously carried. 19.Parcel Mal2 No. 27987-1 (Located south of Highway 79 South, between Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen Way - Vail Ranch commercial Ctr.) Councilmember Roberts asked if approving this map subject to the payment of property taxes would set a precedent for future projects. Public Works Director Kicak explained this request came from the applicant because the lease and sale of the property depends on approval of the final map. He stated the City would not release the map until the taxes have been paid. City Attorney Thorson stated that in his opinion taking this action is stretching the Subdivision Map Act as far as legally possible. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: Councilmember Ford stated he would abstain due to a potential conflict of interest. 19.1Approve Parcel Map No. 27987-1 subject to the conditions of approval, and the Developer providing proof of payment of property taxes and any special assessments prior to release of the map for recordation. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford Mayor Lindemans reordered the agenda to hear Item 26 out of order. Minutes\4\23\96 -10- 05107/96 City Council Minutes Apral 23, 1996 COUNCIL BUSINESS 26.Starliaht Ridae - Traffic Study Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, stated he is in favor of keeping the 25 mph speed limit in Starlight Ridge and said there is a serious traffic problem in that area. Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, President of the Starlight Ridge Homeowner's Association, requested the 25 mph signs be left in place and suggested other things be tried, such as road narrowing. He stated a serious traffic problem persists in this area. Gary Hanna, 42201 Cosmic Drive, stated that walking is not safe in this neighborhood and stated he objects to the traffic report. William Utermohlen, 42231 Cosmic Drive, expressed concern about safety in this area and the risk of increased speeds. Don Maston, 421 76 Cosmic Drive, spoke in opposition to the traffic study and recommendations contained therein. RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 9:15 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:20 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to direct staff to install stop signs at the following locations: 1) Agena and Cosmic, 3-way stop; 2) Santa Cecilia and Agena, 4-way stop and Cosmic and Santa Cecilia, 3-way stop. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve staff recommendation regarding tree and bush trimming. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to direct staff to leave speed limit signs at 25 mph and direct staff to prepare a resolution citing the required findings. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\4\23\96 -11- 05107/96 C'tv Counc*l Manutes April 23, 1996 RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 9:50 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the scheduled Community Services District Meeting, Redevelopment Agency Meeting, Old Town Westside Financing Authority Meeting and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority meeting at 9:52 PM to a Joint Meeting of the Temecula City Council, Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to extend the meeting until 1 1:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. 23.Fenancinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Byl2ass Corridor Councilmember -@tone announced he would abstain due to a conflict of interest and stepped down from the podium. Finance Director Genie Roberts introduced Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig who presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 23.1That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.2That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS Minutes\4\23\96 -12- 05/07/96 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 23.3That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess to execute the Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the City and the Financing Authority at 10:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:10 PM. 24.Financinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor - Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 24.1That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Minutes\4\23\96 -13- OS/07/96 City Council M*nute2- Anr*l 23, 1996 25.Financinas for Old Town Area Public Imi2rovements and the western E3ypass CorridQi Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendations as follows: 25.1That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS 25.2That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWNTWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) 25.3That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 JOLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)K, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT Minutes\4\23\96 -14- 05/07196 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 25.4That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 25.5That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING THE RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone RECESS Chairperson Birdsall called a recess at 10:21 PM to open ballots. The meeting was reconvened at 10:40 PM. City Clerk June Greek announced the ballots had been canvassed and reported the following: There were 186 qualified votes, 186 were cast, 184 voted "yes" and 2 voted .1 11 no Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig explained that the two "no" votes would be included in the district but would only be taxed if within a year, those properties are conveyed to the Buffman organization. Minutes\4\23\96 05/07/96 City Council Minutes- April 23, 1996 it was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendation 25.6 as follows: 25.6That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation 25.7 as follows: 25.7Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meetings at 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\4\23\96 -16- 05107/96 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 COUNCIL BUSINESS 27.Walcott Corridor Street Improvement Project, Project No. PW94-10 Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report. Mayor Lindemans closed the hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation 27.2 through 27.5 as follows: 27.2Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain proceedings so as to acquire the Property. RESOLUTION NO. 96-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL; WALCOTT CORRIDOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT) 27.3Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; 27.4Approve a warrant in the amount of $10,460.00, payable to the clerk of the Superior Court for the deposit required to be made with Court. 27.5Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 28.Memorandum of Understandina Concernina Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Project Services, Inc. Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a brief recess at 10:52 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 1 1:00 PM. Minutes\4\23\96 -17- 05/07/96 Coty Council Minutes Ar)ril 23, 1996 City Attorney Thorson stated the applicant had agreed to delete the Rancho California Road credit. James Hunter, 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, stated he is in favor of staff recommendation and is available to answer any questions the Council may have. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to extend the meeting until 11:20 PM . The motion was carried with Councilmember Birdsall in opposition. Councilmember Stone stated he in not in favor of staff recommendation because of the 50% credit of Quimby Fees for the golf course. James Hunter stated that the City policy specifies 50% credit for private usable space. Councilmember Roberts asked if Mr. Hunter will guarantee that this golf course will remain public. Mr. Hunter stated he could not guarantee this over the long term. Community Development Director Gary Thornhill stated that the City has no existing policy specifically-regarding golf courses. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation, deleting Rancho California Road credit, and subject to modification of Quimby Credit. Directed that Councilmember Stone and Mayor Lindemans sit on a subcommittee to discuss Quimby Fee Credits. 28.1Approve the Memorandum of Understanding concerning Specific Plan No. 199, McMillin Project Services, Inc. For authorizing the payment of development fees at a specified level and directing the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto. The motion was unanimously carried. 29.City Commissioner Term Limits and Monthly Comi2ensatoon City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendations as follows: 29.1Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TERM LIMITS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS Minutes\4\23\96 -1 a- 05/07/96 City Council Minutes April 23, 1996 29.2Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO MONTHLY COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS The motion was unanimously carried. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at 11:31 PM to a meeting on May 14, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes\4\23\96 05/07/96 ITEI\4 3 RESOLUTION NO. 96- ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CrrY OF CULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLADIS AND D S AS SET FORTH IN EXIII[Brr A THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following cwms and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,320,173.91 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A=T: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] Resos\104 STATE OF CALEFORNIA) COUNTY OF IDE) SS CrrY OF TEMFCULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do ce@ that the foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duiy adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day of May, 1996 by the following roU call vote: AYES: COUNCIIL ERS: NOES: COUNC]IL ERS: ABSENT: COUNCIIL ERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Rcw&\IO.4 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/18/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $314,715.41 041n/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 232,560.28 05/02/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 280,675.79 05/14/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,221,973.60 04/18196 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 133,023.05 05/02/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 137,225.78 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05114196 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 2,320.173.91 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERALFUND $ 856,822.22 100 GAS TAX FUND 116,613.67 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 2,625.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 3,052.21 165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 284,696.71 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 82,891.71 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 11,635.44 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 23,470.11 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 7,859.46 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 560.45 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 212,029.94 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-UP 341,674.14 300 INSURANCE FUND 9,858.53 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 72,953.92 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 7,334.67 340 FACILITIES 15,846.90 $ 2,049,925.08 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL $162,681.90 100 GAS TAX 31,872.93 165 RDA-LOWIMOD 953.64 190 TCSD 49,567.11 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 1,250.56 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 1,394.28 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 4,757.84 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 797.62 280 RDA-CIP 5,153.91 300 INSURANCE 1,177.57 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 4,578@35 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,526.54 340 FACILITIES 4,536.48 270,248.83 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 2,320,173.91 E SA ALV7E p REPAR HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. G E HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. RONALB E,7DL ITY MANAGER VOU@E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 OL 16:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 44,282.42 100 GAS TAX FUND 9,235.80 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 179,500.11 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 24,147.79 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 7,154.41 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 22,687.20 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,221.25 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 186.84 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 5,121.75 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 12,397.38 300 INSURANCE FUND 301.42 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5,150.00 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,319.30 340 FACILITIES 1,009.74 TOTAL 314,715.41 VOLJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGP - 1 04/18/96 16:55 VDUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28698 04/12/96 001169 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF FILING:NOD FOR TEM DUCK POND 210-190-143-5802 1,328.00 1,328.00 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 12,373.35 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,705.36 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 29.55 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,983.86 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 93.57 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 84.43 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 417.64 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 75.46 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 147.14 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 128.52 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 32Q-2070 481.66 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 114.17 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 163.89 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 2,946.10 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 594.10 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 14.61 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 882.52 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 21.68 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 23.48 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 84.94 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 14.60 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 78.89 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.44 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 98.88 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 25.00 654991 04/18/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 72.86 24,678.70 570998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 44.91 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 9.57 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 81.29 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 4.63 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 10.58 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 10.53 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 3,321.74 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 670.99 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 8.91 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 660.25 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 17.57 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 10.68 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 98.78 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 16.38 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 30.17 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 38.17 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 132.57 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 21.76 670998 04/18/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 20.34 5,209.82 706101 04/16/96 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO RDA PRJT-28534 PUJOL/FREEMAN 165-199-812-5804 76,290.00 706101 04/16/96 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO RDA PRJT-28555 PUJOL /CEBALLOS 165-199-812-5804 101,124.27 177,4,@ VOUCHDC2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/ 16:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28700 04/18/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & SAND AND PAINT IRRIGATION 193-180-999-5212 60.00 28700 04/18/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & S-11 MEADOWVIEW 193-180-999-5212 60.00 28700 04/18/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & REMOVE TREES/COMM. SERV 193-180-999-5212 115.00 235.00 28701 04/18/96 002278 ABC SEWING & VACUUM REPAIR SERVICES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5242 74.95 74.95 28702 04/18/96 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., PEARL DIVERS GAME 190-183-999-5310 22.50 28702 04/18/96 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., DIVING RINGS 190-183-999-5310 19.80 28702 04/18/96 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 6.00 28702 04/18/96 001391 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC., TAX 190-183-999-5310 3.74 52.04 28703 04/18/96 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. LA 6015202040196 TH 320-199-999-5208 46.01 46.01 28704 04/18/96 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP SHOP DRW. REVIEW/JB#93-045 280-199-805-5802 360.00 360.00 28705 04/18/96 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE HASLER 30 LBS. POSTAGE SCALE 330-1940 924.00 28705 04/18/96 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE TAX 330-1940 71.61 995.61 28706 04/18/96 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFEGUARD TRAINING SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 466.00 28706 04/18/96 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS RED CROSS AQUATICS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 15.00 481.00 2' 04/18/96 ANDERSON, VENITA REFUND-STORYTIME ADVENTURE 190-183-4982 15.00 15.00 28708 04/18/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 3/30 WILLIAMS 001-162-999-5118 54.18 54.18 28709 04/18/96 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES APR RESTROOM RENTAL ADA IMPRVT 280-199-999-5212 826.00 826.00 28710 04/18/96 CALIF ETHNIC MINORITY A FAMILY REC WKSHP:PELLETIER:5/9 190-180-999-5261 15.00 28710 04/18/96 CALIF ETHNIC MINORITY A FAMILY REC WKSHP:PARKER:5/9 190-180-999-5261 15.00 30.00 28711 04/18/96 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT ADVISOR INVESTMNT WKSH:MCDERMOTT:5/2-3 001-140-999-5261 125.00 125.00 28712 04/18/96 CASAZZA, HELEN REFUND-GOLF 190-183-4980 20.00 20.00 28713 04/18/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 100-164-601-5244 530.35 28713 04/18/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 100-164-601-5244 409.45- 120.90 28714 04/18/96 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC APRIL-FIRE-SECURITY ALARM 190-182-999-5250 50.00 28714 04/18/96 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC APRIL-SENIOR CTR. ALARM 190-181-999-5250 45.00 95.00 28715 04/18/96 CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRES RENEWAL:PLAN COMM JRNL:SPRG 96 001-161-501-5228 32.50 28715 04/18/96 CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRES RENEWAL:PLAN COMM JRNL:SPRG 96 001-161-502-5228 32.50 65.00 28716 04/18/96 CISNEROS, CHERYL REFUND-WOMEN'S SELF DEFENSE 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00 28717 04/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATIONS SER 280-199-999-5270 500.00 28717 04/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATION SERV 280-199-999-5270 2,713.00 28717 04/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATION SERV 280-199-999-5270 2,664.99 287-17 04/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATION SERV 280-199-999-5270 837.50 2P 04/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATION SERV 280-199-999-5270 1,616.10 2@ 104/18/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI MARKETING/PUBLIC RELATION SERV 280-199-999-5270 2,215.25 10,546.84 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PArl- 3 04/18/96 16:55 VO(JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28718 04/18/96 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50 28719 04/18/96 000155 DAVLIN TAPING-CITY COUNCIL/APRIL 9 001-100-999-5250 800.00 800.00 28720 04/18/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RECYCLED PAINT FOR GRAFFITI 100-164-601-5218 31.99 28720 04/18/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RECYCLED PAINT FOR GRAFFITI 100-164-601-5218 73.07 28720 04/18/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 146.59 251.65 28721 04/18/96 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 95366-02 03/07-04/08 DIEGO DR 193-180-999-5240 169.65 169.65 28722 04/18/96 FAY, BONNIE REFUND-YOGA FOR THE 90'S 190-183-4982 42.00 42.00 28723 04/18/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK c 5473 6664 0391 0222 RR 001-100-999-5260 25.25 28723 04/18/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK c 5473 6664 0391 0222 RR 001-100-999-5258 1,175.69 28723 04/18/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK c 5473 6664 0391 0222 RR 001-100-999-5208 1.65 28723 04/18/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK c 5473 6664 0391 0115 JG 001-120-999-5260 67.00 1,269.59 28724 04/18/96 000712 FORD, STEVEN J. REIMB:LEAGUE CONG CF:3/8-12/96 001-100-999-5258 651.56 651.56 28725 04/18/96 FREDERICK, KATHY REFUND-BASIC LEADERSHIP SKILLS 190-183-4982 50.00 50.00 28726 04/18/96 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. BEVERAGE FOR CITY HALL MTGS 340-199-999-5250 204.89 2t 28727 04/18/96 000184 G I E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-1211 POLICE DEPT 320-199-999-5208 283.47 28727 04/18/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-640" GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,258.58 28727 04/18/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-1370 SVC FOR COP 320-199-999-5208 121.11 1,663.16 28728 04/18/96 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. APR ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 305.00 305.00 28729 04/18/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYC. EVALUATION/TEM.POLIC 001-170-999-5214 150.00 150.00 28730 04/18/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 3/8 INCH COMBS 330-199-999-5220 7.42 28730 04/18/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 1 INCH COMBS 330-199-999-5220 11.35 28730 04/18/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 3/4 INCH COMBS 330-199-999-5220 16.82 28730 04/18/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 3.94 28730 04/18/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. TAX 330-199-999-5220 3.06 42.59 28731 04/18/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM SUPPLEMENTAL LIMITED PHASE 11 165-199-999-5250 955.00 28731 04/18/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM ENVIRON REVIEW-28534 PUJOL ST 165-199-999-5250 995.00 1,950.00 28732 04/18/96 002238 GREYBAR PRINTING LANDLORD HANDBOOK COVERS 001-170-999-5222 1.13 28732 04/18/96 002238 GREYBAR PRINTING LANDLORD HANDBOOK BACKINGS 001-170-999-5222 1.13 28732 04/18/96 002238 GREYBAR PRINTING BINDINGS FOR HANDBOOKS 001-170-999-5222 25.00 28732 04/18/96 002238 GREYBAR PRINTING TAX 001-170-999-5222 2.11 29.37 28733 04/18/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS, INC SECURITY GRD/W-E 3/31 210-190-137-5801 293.75 293.75 28734 04/18/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 730.14 28734 04/18/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 146.51 876 A5 28735 04/18/96 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE HHRC EAP SERVICES 001-150-999-5250 341.70 3,, VOUC@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 04 16:55 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28736 04/18/96 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC. CAMCORDER & BAG FOR RECORDING 190-180-999-5610 750.00 28736 04/18/96 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC. TAX 190-180-999-5610 58.13 808.13 28737 04/18/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,416.74 28737 04/18/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 100-2080 227.24 28737 04/18/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 436.92 2,080.90 28738 04/18/96 002268 INSUPCO SIGNAL STAT LIGHT BAR 001-162-999-5214 182.32 182.32 28739 04/18/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 154.92 28739 04/18/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 100-2140 154.90 309.82 28740 04/18196 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 459.20 459.20 28741 04/18/96 002277 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL FIRE DEPT-KIDS COLORING BOOK 190-180-999-5301 118.19 118.19 28742 04/18/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP/W-E 3/31/JL EVANS 001-163-999-5118 110.94 28742 04/18/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP/W-E 3/31/JL EVANS 100-164-604-5118 219.65 28742 04/18/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP/W-E 3/31/JL EVANS 100-164-604-5118 2.21 332.80 28743 04/18/96 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 179.15 179.15 04/18/96 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:TEAMCAL LEGIS DAY:MJM:4/10 001-110-999-5258 174.00 174.00 28745 04/18/96 000414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM PURCHASE AND PROCESSING 190-180-999-5250 34.47 34.47 28746 04/18/96 001653 MAILER'S SOFTWARE ACCUMAIL AUTO UPDATE 320-199-999-5211 221.43 221.43 28747 04/18/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP/W-E 3/31 SNYDER 190-180-999-5118 574.00 574.00 28748 04/18/96 MATSEN, NANCY REFUND-CREATIVE BEGINNINGS 190-183-4982 7.50 28748 04/18/96 MATSEN, NANCY REFUND-CREATIVE BEGINNINGS 190-183-4982 5.00 12.50 28749 04/18/96 001027 METROPOLITAN WATER DIST ENG PLAN REVIEW:WALCOTT CORRID 210-165-637-5802 2,000.00 2,000.00 28750 04/18/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY STATIONARY-ENVELOPES 001-140-999-5222 176.82 28750 04/18/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-140-999-5222 13.70 190.52 28751 04/18/96 002213 MUFFLERS WEST OF TEMECU HITCH FOR RADAR TRAILER 001-170-999-5215 132.75 132.75 28752 04/18/96 000399 MUNI MANAGEMENT ASSIST MEMBERSHIP:YATES, GRANT 001-150-999-5226 40.00 40.00 28753 04/18/96 001986 MUSI-CAL AUDIO ENVIRONM CRC LIGHTING SYSTEM REPAIR 190-180-999-5301 89.40 89.40 28754 04/18/96 001676 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, DISPATCH RADIOS MOBILE SERVS 320-199-999-5209 984.00 984.00 28755 04/18/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY T,IMES PUBLIC HEARING: PA95-0125 001-120-999-5256 28.80 28.80 28756 04/18/96 002100 OBJECT RADIANCE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 369.60 369.60 04/18/96 OGLE, BARBARA REFUND-MODELING WITH FIMO 190-183-4982 12.00 12.00 VOIJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAr-9 5 04/18/96 16:55 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28758 04/18/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 100-164-601-5214 31.45 28758 04/18/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 001-165-999-5214 167.38 28758 04/18/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 100-16,4-601-5214 45.00 243.83 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-163-999-5250 15.00 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 100-164-601-5238 15.00 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-165-999-5238 7.50 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 100-164-604-5208 7.50 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-120-999-5250 7.50 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-162-999-5238 37.50 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-170-999-5242 78.88 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 190-180-999-5250 75.00 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-100-999-5250 15.00 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 320-199-999-5238 18.95 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET APR PAGING SERVS/PAGER RENTAL 001-1990 40.00 28759 04/18/96 001561 PAGENET CREDIT-CHRG FOR LOST PAGER 001-1990 40.00- 277.83 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 191.62 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 65.18 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 14,058.16 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 2,709.84 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 82.54 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 2,827.80 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 95.64 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 111.05 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 326.05 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 75.17 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 226.21 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 106.83 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 282.54 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 119.24 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 363.37 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 60.48 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 11.15 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 .23 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 11.63 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .47 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .93 28760 04/18196 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.39 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .23 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .78 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 28760 04/18/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.09 21,732.94 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5260 18.98 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5260 12.13 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5301 34.11 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5301 11.22 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5220 8.51 VOUCH@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 04 16.55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-502-5260 15.91 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-501-5261 7.49 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 8.62 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5310 18.76 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 16.96 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5250 16.00 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-604-5260 3.50 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 12.00 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5220 4.84 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5220 11.84 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 4.84 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5220 7.05 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5220 8.08 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5244 30.00 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5244 30.00 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 320-199-999-5230 8.10 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 10.87 28761 04/18/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 18.98 318.79 28763 04/18/96 PHILLIPS, MICHAL REFUND-AQUATIC PROGRAMS 190-183-4975 46.00 46.00 7 04/18/96 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC., REVISION TO ZONING MAPS 001-161-502-5248 570.50 570.50 28tb5 04/18/96 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI ROOM:SIERRA CF:HAFELI:5/1-5/3 320-199-999-5258 225.00 225.00 28766 04/18/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT/LAND DEVELOPMENT 001-163-999-5268 18.37 28766 04/18/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTSILAND DEVELOPMENT 001-163-999-5268 46.71 65.08 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 100-164-601-5240 13.69 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 190-180-999-5240 880.19 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2113-3/14 190-181-999-5240 112.03 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 190-182-999-5240 608.57 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 191-180-999-5240 223.43 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 193-180-999-5240 519.19 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VAROIUS WTR METERS 2/13-3/14 340-199-999-5240 21.20 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WTR METERS 2/27-3/27 190-180-999-5240 118.36 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WTR METERS 2/27-3/27 191-180-999-5240 35.44 28767 04/18/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WTR METERS 2/27-3/27 193-180-999-5240 320.58 2,852.68 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT-CIP 001-165-999-5214 4.00 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-162-999-5214 12.00 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-163-999-5214 11.19 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 190-180-999-5214 4.00 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5214 4.00 28768 04/18/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5263 19.37 54.56 28769 04/18/96 000526 REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY 0 CODE ENFORCE PRGM:ELMO:SPRG 96 001-162-999-5261 205.00 205.00 28770 04/18/96 000266 RIGHTWAY PORT.TOILET FOR CITY-3/29-4/25 100-164-601-5238 57.39 57.39 2 04/18/96 000352 RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR 14 MAP COPIES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5220 7.00 7.00 VDtJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAr4F - 7 04/18/96 16:55 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28772 04/18/96 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5220 7.50 7.50 28773 04/18/96 001675 RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD APR RIGHT OF WAY SERVS 1 HOUR 280-199-602-5700 51.55 28773 04/18/96 001675 RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD APR RIGHT OF WAY SERVS 210-165-637-5804 930.00 28773 04/18/96 001675 RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD APR RIGHT OF WAY-WALCOTT CORRI 210-165-637-5804 570.00 1,551.55 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263 423.12 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263 79.28 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263 124.39 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 296.65 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5263 43.74 28774 04/18/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 119.96 1,087.14 28775 04/18/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA REGIST CF:HAFELI:5/1-3 320-199-999-5258 225.00 225.00 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-987-0692 45006 PUT GRN ST 191-180-999-5319 15.29 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-4813 MARGARITA T/C 191-180-999-5319 34.21 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA A 190-182-999-5240 4,056.05 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5620 DE PORTOLA 190-180-999-5240 1,448.10 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330 STREET LIGHTING 192-180-999-5319 22,456.63 28776 04/18/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603 BUSINESS PARK DR 191-180-999-5319 6,617.11 34,627.39 28777 04/18/96 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 021-725-0700 SR CENTER 190-181-999-5240 66.99 28777 04/18/96 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 091-024-9300 CRC 190-182-999-5240 978.70 1,045.69 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4769 JS 001-100-999-5208 79.61 287'78 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4204 KL 001-100-999-5208 50.50 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4763 PB 001-100-999-5208 36.88 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4758 RR 001-100-999-5208 57.87 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-4070 MJM 001-110-999-5208 140.17 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909202-47'70 RB 001-110-999-5208 40.90 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4757 JG 001-120-999-5208 60.04 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4767 GT 001-161-501-5208 34.96 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4767 GT 001-161-502-5208 34.95 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 20379994 BB 100-164-601-5208 45.42 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4764 BB BLAZER 100-164-601-5208 100.85 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4760 JH 100-164-603-5208 79.26 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW 100-164-601-5208 47.83 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-8688 PW EOC 100-164-604-5208 91.12 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 206-0992 BH 190-180-999-5208 43.36 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4755 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 38.60 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-9876 HP 190-180-999-5208 81.03 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4754 KH 190-180-999-5208 65.35 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 212-0934 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 46.79 28778 04/18/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4756 KRTM EOC USAGE 320-199-999-5208 37.74 1,213.23 28779 04/18/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 9.73 9.73 28780 04/18/96 000826 TRAVEL TRUST AIR:LEAGUE CF:EDWARDS:4/10-12 190-180-999-5258 147.00 147.00 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,648.41 VOUCHR,E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 oz 16:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 100-2080 176.71 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 756.70 28781 04118/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 19.70 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 5.00 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 312.50 28781 04/18/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 87.50 4,011.52 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 421.04 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 89.70 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 761.98 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 43.40 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 99.22 28782 04/18/96 000389 U S C M IPEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 96.00 1,511.34 28783 04/18/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 001-2120 67.28 28783 04118/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 100-2120 10.92 28783 04/18/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 190-2120 15.00 28783 04/18/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 280-2120 .30 93.50 28784 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR. UNIFORMS FOR PUB WORKS 100-164-601-5243 163.49 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR MAINT UNIFORMS RENTAL TCSD 190-180-999-5243 216.48 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR MAINT UNIFORMS RENTAL TCSD 190-180-999-5243 280.22 28t84 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR FLOOR MAT RENTAL/CITY HALL 340-199-999-5250 73.60 28784 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR. FLOOR MAT RENTAL/C.R.C 190-182-999-5250 79.64 28784 04/18/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MAR. FLR MAT RENTAL/SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5250 50.00 863.43 28785 04/18/96 001881 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, LARGE RESCUE TUBES #710 190-183-999-5310 210.00 28785 04/18/96 001881 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 15.59 225.59 28786 04/18/96 001187 WOODS, LESLIE J.BROOKS RECEPTION:ATTD MJM 001-110-999-5260 15.00 15.00 28787 04/18/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI COPIER LEASE FOR CRC/APRIL 190-182-999-5239 117.84 117.84 TOTAL CHECKS 314,715.41 V(XJC"F2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 04, 14:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 3,264.32 100 GAS TAX FUND 2,102.70 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 2,625.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 3,052.21 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 90,609.50 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 5,564.98 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 95,553.33 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 22,161.33 300 INSURANCE FUND 576.53 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 6,838.61 340 FACILITIES 211.77 TOTAL 232,560.28 VOLJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAr-- 1 04/25/96 14:47 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28789 04/23/96 000876 TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON SISTER CITY SOUVENIRS/VOORBURG 001-100-999-5280 182.00 182.00 962404 04/24/96 DARICHI KANGYO BANK OF RDA CONTRIBUTION/RANCHO WEST 165-199-812-5804 90,300.00 90,300.00 28792 04/25/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & DUCK POND FOUNTAIN/PUMP REMOVL 190-180-999-5212 225.00 225.00 28793 04/25/96 002301 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION MEMBERSHIP: JACK HODSON 001-163-999-5226 125.00 125.00 28794 04/25/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 4-13 WILLIAMS 190-180-999-5118 72.24 28794 04/25/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 4/13 BARNETT 001-110-999-5118 72.24 144.48 28795 04/25196 001424 AUDIENCES UNLIMITED, IN HUDSON ST SHOW TAPING 2/2/96 190-183-999-5350 75.00 75.00 28796 04/25/96 BURGER KING REFUND:SIGNAL MIT FEE PD TWICE 120-199-4235 2,625.00 2,625.00 28797 04/25/96 002300 CALTRANS PUB:TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR CONST 100-164-604-5228 45.00 45.00 28798 04/25/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. PETCH, LISA-02-08-96 300-199-999-5205 576.53 576.53 28799 04/25/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-602-5262 13.03 28799 04/25/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-501-5262 19.10 32.13 28800 04/25/96 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION PARTS & EQUIPMENT 190-180-999-5212 9.81 28801 04/25/96 001275 COP4PUSERVE, INC. COMUSERVE INFORMATION SERVICE 320-199-999-5228 10.00 10.00 28802 04/25/96 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS SPORTS PARK CITY SEAL 210-190-137-5804 977.50 977.50 28803 04/25/96 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED TRAFFIC COUNTS/VAR. LOCATIONS 100-164-602-5406 650.00 28803 04/25/96 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED TRAFFIC COUNTS/MARG-RUSTIC GLN 100-164-602-5406 90.00 28803 04/25/96 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED TRAFFIC COUNTS/VAR. LOCATIONS 100-164-602-5406 120.00 860.00 28804 04/25/96 000155 DAVLIN RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS 001-161-501-5250 150.00 150.00 28805 04/25/96 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 52.53 52.53 28806 04/25/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI PGRSS PMT #9 R C SPORTS PARK 210-190-137-5804 72,850.00 28806 04/25/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI RETENTION:PGRSS PMT #9 SPTS PK 210-2035 9,766.41- 28806 04/25/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI CO# 5-8-9-10/PRGSS #9/R C SPT 210-190-137-5804 24,814.15 87,897.74 28807 04/25/96 002298 FEATHERS, ANGELA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/JAN 96 001-120-999-5262 51.77 28807 04/25/96 002298 FEATHERS, ANGELA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/NOV 95 001-120-999-5262 69.00 120.77 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230 17.25 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 70.51 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 54.00 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 9.50 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 210-199-650-5804 51.00 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 10.00 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 36.25 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 165-199-999-5250 9.50 vouc@-Z CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 04/ 14:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 210-199-650-5804 25.84 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 9.50 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 19.00 28808 04/25/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 3.00 315.35 28809 04/25/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-6664-0391-0099/is 001-100-999-5258 308.00 28809 04/25/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-6664-0391-0040/PB 001-100-999-5258 119.14 427.14 28810 04/25/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES 320-199-999-5250 2,507.50 28810 04/25/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN EARLY PMT DISCOUNT-CONSULT SER 320-199-999-5250 442.50- 2,065.00 28811 04/25/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-181-1123/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 543.47 28811 04/25/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-6243/PALA COMM PARK 320-199-999-5208 26.71 28811 04/25/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,372.74 28811 04/25/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-695-3564/ALARM CITY HALL 320-199-999-5208 51.88 28811 04/25/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-8632/GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 27.34 2,022.14 28812 04/25/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. COVERS/SOUTHWEST CO. TOUR PKG 001-110-999-5220 23.68 28812 04/25/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. COMBS/SOUTHWEST CO. TOUR PKG 001-110-999-5220 7.42 28812 04/25/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. FREIGHT 001-110-999-5220 7.47 288-1@2 04/25/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. TAX 001-110-999-5220 2.99 41.56 L 04/25/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 106.97 106.97 28814 04/25/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE HP DESKJET CARTRIDGE-BLACK INK 320-199-999-5221 285.00 28814 04/25/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 10.25 28814 04/25/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-199-999-5221 22.65 317.90 28815 04/25/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS, INC SECURITY GUARD SRVCS/SPRTS PK 210-190-137-5801 587.50 28815 04/25/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS, INC CREDIT:OVERCHRGD SEC. GUARD 210-190-137-5801 293.75- 293.75 28816 04/25/96 002302 HEMET EMPLOYER ADVISORY MEMBERSHIP GRANT YATES 001-150-999-5226 20.00 20.00 28817 04/25/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST INTEL NETWORK SERVER 320-199-999-5221 833.15 28817 04/25/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST TAX 320-199-999-5221 64.32 28817 04/25/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST INTEL NETWORK SERVER 320-199-999-5221 417.77 28817 04/25/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST TAX 320-199-999-5221 32.17 28817 04/25/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 66.46 1,413.87 28818 04/25/96 001340 INNOVATIVE IMAGES APPRECIATION MUGS 190-181-999-5301 198.00 28818 04/25/96 001340 INNOVATIVE IMAGES SET-UP CHARGE 190-181-999-5301 35.00 28818 04/25/96 001340 INNOVATIVE IMAGES TAX 190-181-999-5301 18.05 251.05 28819 04/25/96 000695 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTA TRANSPORTATION ENG. PUB. 100-164-604-5228 138.05 138.05 28820 04/25/96 001420 JOLLY JUMPS JOLLY JUMP INFLATABLE JUMP 190-180-999-5301 50.00 50.00 28821 04/25/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 4/7 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 84.86 28821 04/25/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 4/7 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 164.74 249.60 2 04/25/96 000206 KINKOIS OF RIVERSIDE, I PRINTING SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 80.40 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAG;: 3 04/25/96 14:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28822 04/25/96 000206 KINKOIS OF RIVERSIDE, I COPIES FOR PLANNING 001-161-501-5222 31.02 28822 04/25/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I COPIES FOR PLANNING 001-161-502-5222 31.02 28822 04/25/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I CREDIT:PRINTING SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 40.20- 102.24 28823 04/25/96 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 155.93 155.93 28824 04/25/96 002281 LASSIG CONSTRUCTION CONST. PARK MONUMENT/VOORBURG 190-180-999-5212 985.00 28824 04/25/96 002281 LASSIG CONSTRUCTION EXTEND MOW CURB - VOORBURG PRK 190-180-999-5212 90.00 1,075.00 28825 04/25/96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR 190-180-999-5214 96.96 96.96 28826 04/25/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 4/7 SNYDER 190-180-999-5118 574.00 574.00 28827 04/25/96 001027 METROPOLITAN WATER DIST DEPOSIT:ENG REVIEW:WEST BYPASS 210-165-612-5802 5,000.00 5,000.00 28828 04/25/96 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT ETHERLINK-COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 420.23 420.23 28829 04/25/96 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOTJNTAI CRC POOL BLUE FOOT/SHOWER TOWE 190-182-999-5212 575.00 28829 04/25/96 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FDIJNTAI FREIGHT 190-182-999-5212 70.00 645.00 28830 04/25/96 000232 NEET, JOHN P., MAI VARIOUS APPRAISALS PUJOL ST 165-199-999-5250 300.00 300.00 28831 04/25/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES / PA96-0028 001-161-501-5256 27.52 28831 04/25/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES / PA96-0008 001-161-501-5256 28.20 28831 04/25/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES/ PA96-0038 001-161-501-5256 29.56 85.28 28832 04/25/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR/MAINT D 100-164-601-5214 99.31 99.31 28833 04/25/96 002221 OUR DESIGNS, INC SUPPLIES-FIRE PREVENTION TRAIN 001-171-999-5296 172.40 172.40 28834 04/25/96 002216 P F C UNLIMITED C.R.C. POOL IMPROVEMENT 190-182-999-5212 324.11 324.11 28835 04/25/96 000249 PE7TY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5250 28.00 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-501-5260 4.99 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5260 13.00 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5258 33.30 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 21.55 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 41.14 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 6.84 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 15.27 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5263 20.00 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 4.31 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5260 11.57 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 320-199-999-5220 11.97 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5260 7.33 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 21.16 28835 04/25/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 24.77 28835 04125/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 18.12 283.32 28836 04/25/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS SLIDES FOR MGMT RETREAT 001-150-999-5260 50.64 F VOUC[4@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 04 14:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28837 04/25/96 002019 PRECISION INTERCONNECT CABLE INSTALLATION-2/CAT 5/DAT 320-199-999-5215 180.00 180.00 28838 04/25/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTALS - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 195.47 195.47 28839 04/25/96 002027 PRINCIPE AND ASSOCIATES DUCK POND WTR/SOIL ANALYSIS 210-190-143-5802 1,000.00 1,000.00 28840 04/25/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVS-DUPLICATE KEYS 190-180-999-5212 9.70 28840 04/25/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVS-CRC LOCKS 190-180-999-5212 383.34 393.04 28841 04/25/96 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-999-5212 211.77 211.77 28842 04/25/96 REGISTER OF COPYRIGHTS CPYRGHT:OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOGO 280-199-999-5270 20.00 28842 04/25/96 REGISTER OF COPYRIGHTS CPYRGHT:OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOGO 280-199-999-5270 20.00 40.00 28843 04/25/96 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:COMM SERV CF:4/10-12/96 190-180-999-5258 40.00 40.00 28844 04/25/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, MISC SUPPLIES-CRC CRAFTS CLASS 190-183-999-5340 425.64 28844 04/25/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, FREIGHT 190-183-999-5340 69.50 495.14 28845 04/25/96 001942 S C SIGNS POSTING OF PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS 001-161-501-5256 910.00 910.00 7 04/25/96 SCARDONE, LURA REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28b47 04/25/96 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SR CENTER MISC SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301 204.56 204.56 28848 04/25/96 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CNTRL SERVS-SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 29.00 29.00 28849 04/25/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4759 TE 001-162-999-5208 61.08 28849 04/25/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4752 SN 190-180-999-5208 87.68 148.76 28850 04/25/96 000521 STEWART, BRUCE M. PERFORM STREET ADDRESSING 001-162-999-5250 230.00 230.00 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 1 PANEL MOUNT NAME PLATE 001-161-501-5220 21.50 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 1 PANEL MOUNT NAME PLATE 001-161-502-5220 21.50 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 PRESPACED LETTERS FOR NAME 001-161-502-5220 3.50 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 PRESPACED LETTERS FOR NAME 001-161-501-5220 3.50 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 LESS 10% COMPANY DISCOUNT 001-161-501-5220 1.95- 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 LESS 10% COMPANY DISCOUNT 001-161-502-5220 1.95- 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 001-161-501-5220 3.45 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 FREIGHT 001-161-502-5220 3.45 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 TAX 001-161-501-5220 1.94 28851 04/25/96 000303 SYSTEM 2/90 TAX 001-161-502-5220 1.94 56.88 28852 04/25/96 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV P PLUMBING SERVICES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5212 57.00 57.00 28853 04/25/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC PCKUP AIRPT:COMM CF:HM,JN,RS 190-180-999-5258 65.00 28853 04/25/96 000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC DRPOF AIRPT:COM CF:HM,JN,RS,TE 190-180-999-5258 65.00 130.00 28854 04/25/96 002303 TIM PARKER WOODWORKING HEALTH ZONE LOAN-TENANT IMPVMT 280-1520 22,034.88 22,034.88 1 04/25/96 001921 TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO MAR METROSCAN SOFTWARE SUBSCRI 320-199-999-5211 397.50 397.50 VOtJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGF- 5 04/25/96 14:47 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28856 04/25/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES MAR DESIGN SERVS-NEW CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 89.73 28856 04/25/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES MAR DESIGN SERVS-NEW CITY HALL 210-199-650-5804 217.77 307.50 28857 04/25/96 001686 V I P TOTS/FAMILY FRIEN CDBG REIMBURSEMENT 140-199-999-5250 3,052.21 3,052.21 28858 04/25/96 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, 1 20 BAGS/25LBS EACH MAGIC SORB 100-164-601-5218 100.00 28858 04/25/96 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, I TAX 100-164-601-@218 7.75 28858 04/25/96 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, 1 40 BAGS/25LBS EACH MAGIC SORB 100-164-60 -18 534.00 28858 04/25/96 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY, I TAX 100-164-60'i-'@218 41.39 683.14 28859 04/25/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-C.R.C. 190-182-999-5212 158.14 158.14 TOTAL CHECKS 232,560.28 VoUrwRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13 05 15:07 VO(JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 142,090.63 100 GAS TAX FUND 30,126.40 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 5,427.55 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 27,341.53 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 3,665.45 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 782.91 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 4,443.21 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 373.61 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 1,299.19 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 40,733.08 300 INSURANCE FUND 719.62 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,521.85 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 6,015.37 340 FACILITIES 14,135.39 TOTAL 280,675.79 VOIJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 05/02/96 15:07 VOIJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28860 04/25/96 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 001-161-501-5224 78.00 78.00 28861 04/25/96 001027 METROPOLITAN WATER DIST RIGHT-OF-WAY:PW94-10:WALCOTT 210-165-637-5802 1,000.00 1,000.00 28862 04/25/96 002286 THERMAL INDUSTRIES INC HEALTH ZONE LOAN-TENANT IMPROV 280-1520 17,255.19 17,255.19 28863 04/26/96 002227 FRY, JAMES E., P.E. CONST. ANALYSIS/1-15 WIDEN RMP 001-1280 6,510.00 6,510.00 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 55.98 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 9.75 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 82.14 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 5.37 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 11.15 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 8.83 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 3,438.22 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 660.72 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 8.91 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 688.47 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 17.57 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 10.68 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 98.78 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 16.22 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 35.86 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 38.7 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 116.14 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 22.20 627704 05/02/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 25.82 5,350.98 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) UI AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 001-2350 16,873.83 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) UI AND ET TAX 1ST OTR 196 100-2350 3,176.51 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 190-2350 5,329.19 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 165-2350 73.51 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 191-2350 147.02 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 192-2350 204.12 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 193-2350 563.87 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 280-2350 512.82 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) UI AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 300-2350 142.97 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) UI AND ET TAX 1ST OTR 196 194-2350 73.89 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) UI AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 320-2350 294.00 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 330-2350 207.65 663140 04/30/96 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) Ul AND ET TAX 1ST QTR 196 340-2350 602.70 28,202.08 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 12,893.30 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,663.29 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 29.55 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 3,117.43 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 93.57 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 a4.43 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 417.63 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 74.72 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 173.40 VotiC@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 05 15:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 128.52 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0002a3 FEDERAL 320-2070 450.85 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 115.29 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 187.74 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,095.31 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 583.08 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 14.62 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 896.76 698685 05102/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 21.68 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 23.48 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 87.64 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 14.56 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 84.83 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.44 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 92.74 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 25.22 698685 05/02/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 77.48 25,469.56 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 515.98 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-2310 80.51 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 4.18 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 72.40 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.14 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 2.44 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70 28865 05/02/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA PAYMENT FOR MAY 96 001-1180 9.75 707.10 28866 05/02/96 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPL POOL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 44.12 44.12 28867 05102196 001427 ALVAREZ, THERESA REIMB:CF-A/P WRKSHP-4/17-18 001-140-999-5261 48.84 48.84 28868 05/02/96 002194 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. MEMBERSHIP:D. UBNOSKE 001-161-501-5226 89.00 28868 05/02/96 002194 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. MEMBERSHIP:D. UBNOSKE 001-161-502-5226 89.00 28868 05/02/96 002194 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. MEMBERSHIP:M. FAGAN 001-161-501-5226 236.00 414.00 28869 05/02/96 001910 AMERITECH COMMUNICATION COPIER SERVICES AGREEMENT 5535 330-199-999-5217 217.18 217.18 28870 05/02/96 ANDERSON, VENITA REFUND:GYMNASTICS CLASS 190-183-4982 44.00 44.00 28871 05/02/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER - MAINT. YARD 100-164-601-5240 25.04 25.04 28872 05/02/96 002240 ASLIN INDUSTRIES PARKS-RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS 190-180-999-5212 459.00 459.00 28873 05/02/96 000122 B S N SPORTS MISC. RECREATION SUPPLES 190-180-999-5301 51.34 51.34 28874 05/02/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CRC-BACK STAGE IMPROVEMENTS 190-182-999-5212 335.74 28874 05/02/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER HVAC/ ELECT SRVCS FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 71.50 28874 05/02/96 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER HVAC/ELECT SRVCS FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 70.10 477.34 ;y 05/02/96 BERGH, MARK REFUND-OVRCHG PERMIT/895-1889 001-2660 3,222.75 3,222.75 VOtJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAU--@3 05/02/96 15:07 VOLJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOtJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NLR48ER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28876 05/02/96 000370 BIRDSALL, PATRICIA REIMB:CF-LEAGUE-4/9-12 BIRDSAL 001-100-999-5258 120.91 120.91 28877 05/02/96 BOY'S & GIRLIS CLUB REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28878 05/02/96 002123 BROWN,CHUDLEIGH,SCHULER APPRAISAL OF OLD TOWN WESTSIDE 280-2645 21,500.00 21,500.00 28879 05/02/96 BURG, GARY REIMB:COMM SRVC PROJECT/PARKS 190-180-999-5212 107.65 107.65 28880 05/02/96 000924 C A P P 0, INC. MEM8ERSHIP:ALLIE KUHNS 001-140-999-5226 45.00 28880 05/02/96 000924 C A P P 0, INC. MEM8ERSHIP:MARY VOLLMUTH 001-140-999-5226 45.00 90.00 28881 05/02/96 CABRERA, ELSA REFUND:SEC. DEP/ROOM RENTAL 190-183-4990 140.00 28881 05/02/96 CABRERA, ELSA REFUND:SEC. DEP/ROOM RENTAL 190-2900 100.00 240.00 28882 05/02/96 001590 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN CF-REDEVELOP/THORNHILL/5/2-3 001-161-501-5261 74.38 28882 05/02/96 001590 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN CF-REDEVELOP/THORNHILL/5/2-3 001-161-502-5261 74.37 148.75 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTDMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 5,260.64 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 5,260.(>4 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 4,661.55 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 5,260.64 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 4,661.55 28883 05/02/96 002246 CANYON LAKE VOLUNTEER F SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATOR 001-171-999-5610 2,686.21 27,71, 28884 05/02/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS:NO STOPPING 100-164-602-5244 371.04 28894 05/02/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 100-164-602-5244 28.76 399.80 28885 05/02/96 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA MAY LEASE PMT-TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391 22.74 28885 05/02/96 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA MAY LEASE PMT-TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-2800 1,404.83 1,427.57 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 39.75 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 18.75 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 100-2330 47.75 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 114.25 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 167.91 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330 58.19 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 165-2330 6.47 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 89.64 28886 05/02/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 6.47 588.93 28887 05/02/96 CUR SCOUTS PACK #301 REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28888 05/02/96 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50 28889 05/02/96 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS SUPPLY/FIELD TANKS 100-164-601-5218 14.78 14.78 28890 05/02/96 000155 DAVLTN TAPING OF COUNCIL MEETINGS 001-100-999-5250 800.00 800.00 28891 05/02/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-REV 001-1180 8.39- 28891 05/02/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 VOUCH]2f-:2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 051 15:07 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOIJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28891 05/02/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AMIN 001-2340 15.00 28891 05/02/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADV 001-1180 8.39 28891 05/02/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 31.78 28892 05/02/96 DIKLICH, KIM REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28893 05/02/96 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 4/21 COLEMAN 001-110-999-5118 293.48 293.48 28894 05/02/96 DROUILLARD, SUZANNE OR REFUND:TENNIS CLASS 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00 28895 05/02/96 001722 EDWARDS, SALLY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 156.00 156.00 28896 05/02/96 000478 FAST SIGNS RESTROOM SIGNS OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5212 127.36 127.36 28897 05/02/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 330-199-999-5277 6.50 28897 05/02/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 17.25 28897 05/02/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230 15.25 28897 05102/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 13.00 28897 05/02/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 165-199-813-5801 9.50 61.50 28898 05/02/96 002175 FIELD, SCOTT F. CABLE TV FRANCHISE TRNS REVIEW 001-130-999-5246 826.55 826.55 1 105/02/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-66(>4-0391-0131/AE/APRIL 001-162-999-5258 537.42 288YY 05/02/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473-6664-0391-0131/AE/APRIL 001-1170 53.26 590.68 28900 05/02/96 002063 FLOYD JOHNSTON CONSTRUC RETENTION/PW95-03:SOLANA WAY 001-1280 14,005.50 28900 05/02/96 002063 FLOYD JOHNSTON CONSTRUC MAR PRGSS PMT/PW95-03:SOLANA W 001-1280 3,950.00 17,955.50 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 530.44 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 100-2360 101.97 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 2.13 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 114.76 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 4.25 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 8.50 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2360 12.75 28901 05/02196 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 2.12 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 7.22 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 4.24 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 8.50 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 8.50 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 19.12 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 905.28 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 100-2380 171.39 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 5.28 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 185.99 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 5.85 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 6.89 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 20.31 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 4.76 2,- 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 280-2380 14.27 2 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 7.08 VO(JCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAC' 5 05/02/96 15:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 18.52 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 6.89 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 22.83 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 941.43 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 100-2500 181.08 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 165-2500 5.59 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 195.63 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 6.'9 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 7.29 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 21.49 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 5.04 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 280-2500 15.10 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 7.49 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 320-2500 19.59 28901 05/02/9t 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 330-2500 7.29 28901 05/02/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 340-2500 24.16 3,637.21 28903 05/02/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES 320-199-999-5250 102.37 102.37 28904 05/02.'Pc) 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-694-4354/PALA COMM PARK 320-199-999-5208 28.84 28904 05/02/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-2475/APR/PUBLIC WORKS 100-164-601-5208 40.17 28904 05/02/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-7945/CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 51.59 17 28905 05/02/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD MAY RENT FOR CITY YARD 100-164-601-5234 440.00 28905 05/02/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD MAY RENT FDR,CITY YARD 190-180-999-5234 352.00 28905 05/02/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD MAY RENT FOR CITY YARD 001-162-999-5234 88.00 880.00 28906 05/02/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR-TEM. POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 100.00 28907 05/02/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 1 1/2 IN. COMBS 330-199-999-5220 18.65 28907 05/02/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. 7 MIL CLEAR COVER 8.5 X 11 330-199-999-5220 59.20 28907 05/02/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 7.00 28907 05/02/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. TAX 330-199-999-5220 6.58 91.43 28908 05/02/96 002311 GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVE GOV'T ACCT:MCDERMOTT:6/27 001-140-999-5261 295.00 295.00 28909 05/02/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 86.71 28909 05/02/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 152.81 28909 05/02/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 26.63 28909 05/02/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 103.39 369.54 28910 05/02/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE MAXELL FORMATTED DISKETTE 3.511 320-199-999-5220 89.98 28910 05/02/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5220 8.71 28910 05/02/96 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-199-999-5220 7.35 106.04 28911 05/02/96 002252 GUARD SYSTEMS, INC SEC. GUARD-SPORTS PK W/E 4/14 210-190-137-5801 293.75 293.75 28912 05/02/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MISC. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 15.07 28912 05/02/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MISC. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 6.53 28912 05/02/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MISC. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 442.04 28912 05/02/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MISC. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 96.88 V(XJCKRf:,? CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 05/ 15:07 VOLJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28912 05/02/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MISC. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 88.13 (>48.65 28913 05/02/96 001069 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218 252.42 28913 05/02/96 001069 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS FREIGHT 100-164-601-5218 3.40 28913 05/02/96 001069 HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS TAX 100-164-601-5218 19.56 275.38 28914 05/02/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,640.81 28914 05/02/96 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 100-2080 227.26 28914 05/02/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 530.42 28914 05/02/96 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 28.04 2,426.53 28915 05/02/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 145.66 28915 05/02/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 100-2140 145.65 291.31 28916 05/02/96 002299 INTERNATIONAL RISK MANA RISK REPORT SUBCRIPTION 300-199-999-5228 159.00 159.00 28917 05/02/96 001652 JERRY KELLETT PAINTING PAINTING SVCS-TEM ELEM POOL RR 190-180-999-5212 460.00 460.00 28918 05/02/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 4/14 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 113.15 28918 05/02/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 4/14 EVANS 100-164-604-5118 219.65 332.80 05/02/96 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. INFLATABLE JOLLY JUMP 190-180-999-5301 50.00 50.00 289ZO 05/02/96 002023 KING, WENDE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 475.20 475.20 28921 05/02/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER SUPPLY 330-199-999-5220 7.28 28921 05/02/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC. PRINTING SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 4.85 12.13 28922 05/02/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP/MAINT CREW 100-164-601-5242 263.88 28922 05/02/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX 100-164-601-5242 20.45 284.33 28923 05/02/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC. PARTS AND EQUIPMENT 190-180-999-5242 8.35 8.35 28924 05/02/96 001671 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL S HAZ-MAT STORAGE/DISPOSAL 100-164-601-5430 267.00 267.00 28925 05/02/96 002309 LAN TIMES SUB:LAN TIMES ON CD ROM 320-199-999-5228 99.00 99.00 28926 05/02/96 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAINT 190-180-999-5214 56.74 56.74 28927 05/02/96 001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL MAY INTERIM FIRE ST. - RENT 001-171-999-5470 600.00 600.00 28928 05/02/96 002229 LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I MAR CLIPPING SERVCS 280-199-999-5250 139.27 139.27 28929 05/02/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 4-14 SNYDER 190-180-999-5118 574.00 574.00 28930 05/02/96 MARKELL, LESLIE TCSD REFUND/CLASS CANCELLATION 190-183-4982 45.00 45.00 28931 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-THOMAS EDWARDS 190-180-999-5222 102.50 28931 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 190-180-999-5222 7.94 2' 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-ZENIADA SMITH 001-140-999-5222 38.25 1 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-140-999-5222 2.96 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PA' 05/02/96 15:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM A-'COUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 14 UMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28931 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS ANTHONY J. ELMO 001-162-999-5222 102.50 28931 05/02/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-162-999-5222 7.94 262.09 28932 05/02/96 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-150-999-5262 15.57 28932 05/02/96 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VI@HICLES 190-180-999-5263 10.40 28932 05/02/96 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 72.25 98.22 28933 05/02/96 MURRIETA MARLINS REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28934 05/02/96 002307 NATIONAL CASSETTE SERVI TAPE: BREAKTHROUGH PERFORMANCE 001-110-999-5228 14.00 14.00 28935 05/02/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES PA96-0013 001-161-501-5256 28.88 28935 05/02/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE PA96-0041 001-161-501-5256 30.42 28935 05/02/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE PA96-0035 001-161-501-5256 30.42 89.72 28936 05/02/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 100-164-601-5214 119.34 119.34 28937 05/02/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. VALUE STATEMENT TRAINING 001-150-999-5248 500.00 28937 05/02/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAR 96 PROF SERVS-TEAM BUILDNG 001-150-999-5248 139.04 639.04 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 202.30 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 65.20 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 190-2130 3.34 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 280-2130 1.00 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 13,771.64 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 2,662.09 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 82.54 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 2,819.57 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 95.64 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 lll.c5 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 326.--@@ 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 7@.17 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 226.21 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 106.83 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 282.54 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 119.24 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 370.30 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 52.48 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 11.15 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURV'VOR 165-2390 .23 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 11.63 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .47 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .93 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.39 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .23 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .78 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 28938 05/02/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.09 21,40t, votic@-2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 05, 15:07 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 112.42 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 44.21 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 44.21 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 181.78 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 100-2090 8.37 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000-245 HELTHNET 190-2090 41.13 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.00 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 3.68 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 .08 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 18.71 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 104.32 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 34.77 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 155.62 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 31.98 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 111.93 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 2.39 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 1,008.65- 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 17.05 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 654.64 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 57.49 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 57.49 - 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 406.00 1 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 451.66 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 100-2090 122.47 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.27 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 4,524.62 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 100-2090 1,146.03 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,557.27 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 296.00 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 96.40 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 296.00 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 381.12 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 1,061.70 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 100-2090 950.59 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 349.60 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 65.24 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 1,419.92 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 100-2090 963.50 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 305.70 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 192-2090 313.54 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 194-2090 101.90 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 2,515.28 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 100-2090 38.40 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 1,082.65 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 97.32 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 1,258.70 28940 05/02/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 100-2090 78.75 20,688.25 28941 05/02/96 000247 PESTMASTER WEED CNTRL PRGM/02/22-03/31 100-164-601-5402 11,419.65 11,419.65 1 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5301 10.76 VO(JCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PArx--- 9 05/02/96 15:07 VDLJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VDLJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5310 16.15 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 3.68 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 24.51 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 12.27 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-601-5260 15.00 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 3.80 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 100-164-604-5220 9.15 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5310 27.15 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5310 6.42 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5310 .74 28942 05/02/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 40.00 169.63 28943 05/02/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 280-199-999-5250 10.78 10.78 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 100-164-604-5230 21.50 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-165-999-5230 19.40 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-163-999-5230 10.75 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-501-5230 39.78 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-502-5230 39.T5 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 190-180-999-5230 10.75 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 38.75 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-140-999-5230 10.75 28944 05/02/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-502-5230 .02 1@ 28945 05/02/96 PRATT, ADELMIRA TCSD REFUND/UNABLE TO ATTEND 190-183-4982 25.00 25.00 28946 05/02/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADS-CIP CONSTRUCT UPDA 001-165-999-5256 135.00 28946 05/02/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN DISPLAY ADS-TCSD COMMISSIONER 001-120-999-5254 68.80 28946 05/02/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN SPRING EGG HUNT ADVERTISMENTS 190-180-999-5254 67.50 271.30 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENT ADV 001-2090 29.17 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 001-2340 1,651.23 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 100-2340 546.84 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 165-2340 14.59 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 190-2340 263.00 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 280-2340 14.58 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 300-2340 14.58 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 330-2340 22.11 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 340-2340 72.92 28947 05/02/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA PAYMNTS FOR MAY 96 001-1180 146.78 2,775.80 28948 05/02/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-180-999-5212 224.86 224.86 28949 05/02/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS STATION #84 210-190-626-5802 5.44 28949 05/02/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 4 ROLLS OF BOND PAPER 330-199-999-5220 266.26 28949 05/02/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C TAX 330-199-999-5220 20.64 28949 05/02/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-CIP DIVISION 001-165-999-5222 32.33 324.67 28950 05/02/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY WIDE 190-180-999-5240 549.74 28950 05/02/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY WIDE 193-180-999-5240 1,498.38 28950 05/02/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY WIDE 340-199-999-5240 290.46 2,3- VOUC @ 2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 05, 15:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28951 05/02/96 002073 RESOURCE GROUP, THE COMMUNITY SRVCS CENSUS 165-199-999-5250 5,000.00 5,000.00 28952 05/02/96 002308 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF RVSD CHLD SUMMT/RR,SF,MR,JC,GY 001-170-999-5261 100.00 28952 05/02/96 002308 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF RVSD CHLD SUMMT/RR,SF,MR,JC,GY 001-100-999-5258 100.00 28952 05/02/96 002308 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF RVSD CHLD SUMMT/RR,SF,MR,JC,GY 001-150-999-5258 50.00 250.00 28953 05/02/96 001097 ROADLINE PRDDUCTS, INC. MISC. PARTS FOR STENCIL TRUCK 100-164-601-5218 768.49 28953 05/02/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. FREIGHT 100-164-601-5218 7.60 28953 05/02/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. TAX 100-164-601-5218 63.40 839.49 28954 05/02/96 ROSALEE, SHEILA TCSD REFUND/CLASS CANCELLATION 190-183-4982 30.00 30.00 28955 05/02/96 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 664.00 664.00 28956 05/02/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263 489.72 28956 05/02/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263 100.40 28956 05/02/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263 151.80 28956 05/02/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 337.59 28956 05102/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5263 42.39 28956 05/02/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 117.26 1,239.16 05/02/96 002236 SAURUS SPORT INC SAURUS SPORT SUNSCREEN 30/35 190-183-999-5310 108.00 05/02/96 002236 SAURUS SPORT INC TAX 190-183-999-5310 8.37 116.37 28958 05/02/96 SCHICK, BOBBY REFUND/ROOFING PERMIT PLAN CK 001-162-4200 40.50 40.50 28959 05/02/96 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CITY 340-199-999-5250 42.00 42.00 28960 05/02/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5026/VARIOUS LOCATION 191-180-999-5319 3,273.21 28960 05/02/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5067/VARIOUS LOCATNS 193-180-999-5240 1,024.67 4,297.88 28961 05/02/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-5153/GY/APR 001-150-999-5208 102.31 102.31 28962 05/02/96 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR/MAINT OF TCSD VEHICLES 190-180-999-5214 22.49 22.49 28963 05/02/96 002224 SYNDISTAR, INC SUPPLIES-FIRE PREVENTION TRNG 001-171-999-5296 100.00 28963 05/02/96 002224 SYNDISTAR, INC SUPPLIES-FIRE PREVENTION TRNG 001-171-999-5296 340.00 28963 05/02/96 002224 SYNDISTAR, INC SUPPLIES-FIRE PREVENTION TRNG 001-171-999-5296 340.00 28963 05/02/96 002224 SYNDISTAR, INC FREIGHT 001-171-999-5296 142.00 922.00 28964 05/02/96 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION 190-180-999-5301 55.71 55.71 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 401.45 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 100-2125 63.82 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 92.50 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 18.50 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 11.10 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.63 28965 05/02/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 18.50 610.50 05/02/96 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES FOR TCSD 190-182-999-5212 590.00 590.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGX--IL 05/02/96 15:07 VO(JCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28967 05/02/96 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES 001-2170 146.54 146.54 28968 05/02/96 0006,42 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 3,287.01 28968 05/02/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 644.16 28968 05/02/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 68.75 28968 05/02/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 37.50 28968 05/02/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 62.50 28968 05/02/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 111.33 4,211.25 28969 05/02/96 000319 TOt4ARK SPORTS, INC. PITCHERS MOUND DIRT PACKING 190-183-999-5380 49.00 28969 05/02/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-999-5380 6.97 28969 05/02/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-183-999-5380 3.80 59.77 28970 05/02/96 TOPPIN, JACQUELINE REFUND OF SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 28971 05/02/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-164-604-5220 .69 28971 05/02/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-164-604-5220 7.63 8.32 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 203.30- 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.41 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 203.30 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.41 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 6.00 28972 05/02/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .69 406.60 28973 05/02/96 001179 TREBOR COMPANY INC., TH MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5242 141.42 141.42 28974 05/02/96 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 752.80 752.80 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,979.77 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 100-2080 176.85 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 756.70 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 5.00 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 25.00 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 5.00 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 312.50 28975 05/02/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 87.50 4,348.32 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 524.74 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160 91.42 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 770.06 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 50.38 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 104.54 28976 05/02/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 82.80 1,623.94 2897'7 05/02/96 002065 UNISDLJRCE COLORED PAPER 330-199-999-5220 555.00 28977 05/02/96 002065 UNISOURCE 3-PART NCR PAPER 330-199-999-5220 156.30 VOU@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12 05 15:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VCXJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28977 05/02/96 002065 UNISOURCE 110 LB. WHITE CARD STOCK 330-199-999-5220 40.56 28977 05/02/96 002065 UNISOURCE TAX 330-199-999-5220 58.27 810.13 28978 05/02/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 001-2120 67.26 28978 05/02/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 100-2120 10.95 28978 05/02/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 190-2120 15.00 28978 05/02/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 280-2120 .29 93.50 28979 05/02/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, CITY HALL BLDG MAINT. SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5212 49.46 49.46 28980 05/02/96 001939 WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC. MAY RENT/ APRIL CAM 340-199-999-5234 11,695.42 11,695.42 28981 05/02/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100A COPIER 330-199-999-5239 3,738.00 3,738.00 28982 05/02/96 YORKE, MARTHA REFUND-NATURE\ENGLISH 190-183-4982 20.00 28982 05/02/96 YORKE, MARTHA REFUND-TEDDY BEARS FOR MUSIC 190-183-4982 29.00 49.00 TOTAL CHECKS 280,675.79 VOUCHR,E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 05 16:36 VOIJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE AMOUNT 001 GENERAL FUND 667,184.85 100 GAS TAX FUND 75,148.77 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 9,159.55 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 25,837.41 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 815.58 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 1,195.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 110,055.67 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 266,382.35 300 INSURANCE FUND 8,260.96 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 57,443.46 340 FACILITIES 490.00 TOTAL 1,221,973.60 VOtJCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAOF 1 05/02/96 16:36 VOtJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOIJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AM(XJNT AMOUNT 28984 05/14/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & REMOVE TREES ON SANTIAGO RD 193-180-999-5212 1,195.00 1,195.00 28985 05/14/96 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA MAR PRGSS/TRAFFIC INTERCNT SYS 210-165-640-5802 8,750.00 28985 05/14/96 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA MARCH SIGNAL DESIGN/MARGARITA 210-165-647-5802 3,000.00 11,750.00 28986 05/14/96 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP MAR DESIGN SERV-MARGARITA PARK 210-190-119-5802 6,575.00 6,575.00 28987 05/14/96 002280 BID ORGANICS SUPPLY CEN BIO STIMULANT FOR DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 1,625.00 28987 05/14/96 002280 BID ORGANICS SUPPLY CEN TAX 210-190-143-5804 117.81 1,742.81 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL RETAINER SRVCS 001-130-999-5246 4,500.00 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 11,975.31 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 190-180-999-5246 1,936.43 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 6,346.91 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 61.89 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR REDEVELOPMENT LEGAL SRVCS 280-199-999-5246 9,690.20 28988 05/14/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS MAR GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 2,059.30 36,570.04 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APRIL LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARKS 190-180-999-5415 13,547.61 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APRIL LANDSCAPE MAINT-SEN CTR 190-181-999-5415 242.52 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APRIL LANDSCAPE MAINT-CRC 190-182-999-5415 1,670.81 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APRIL LANDSCAPE MAINT-MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 815.58 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT. DUCK POND 190-180-999-5415 1,445.00 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT. PALA PARK 190-180-999-5415 2,336.00 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT. T.M.S. 190-180-999-5415 731.00 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC PALOMA DEL SOL PK 190-180-999-5415 344.00 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT/BUTTERFIELD STG 190-180-999-5415 977.60 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT/ NICOLAS PK 190-180-999-5415 1,015.00 28989 05/14/96 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA APR LDSC MAINT/NEW CITY HALL 340-199-999-5415 490.00 23,615.12 28990 05/14,196 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. STRACHOTA INSURANCE 7/24/95 300-199-999-5205 1,852.16 1,852.16 28991 05/14/96 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS SOILS INVESTIGATE/GABION WALL 210-190-138-5802 1,649.39 1,649.39 28992 05/14/96 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED TRAFFIC COtJNTS/VAR. LOCATIONS 100-164-602-5406 1,425.00 1,425.00 28993 05/14/96 001924 DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASS OCT-APR DIF STUDY 001-140-999-5248 3,300.00 28993 05/14/96 001924 DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASS OCT-APR DIF STUDY EXPENSES 001-140-999-5248 450.22 28993 05/14/96 001924 DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASS CREDIT:OVERCHARGED PER CONTRCT 001-140-999-5248 1,230.00- 2,520.22 28994 05/14/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC INSPECTOR NICHOLS/3/2-3/15 280-199-602-5801 2,376.00 28994 05/14/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 3116-29 NICHOLS 280-199-602-5801 2,376.00 28994 05/14/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC CONTR.INSP-3/30-4/12 NICHOLS 280-199-602-5801 2,376.00 7,128.00 28995 05/14/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI PRGSS PMT #10 R C SPORTS PARK 210-190-137-5804 18,168.34 28995 05/14/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI PRGSS PMT #10 R C SPORTS PARK 210-190-137-5804 13,121.66 28995 05/14/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI RETENTION:PRGS PMT #lD SPRT PK 210-2035 7,365.81- 28995 05/14/96 001945 E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI CO# 3-4-5-6-7-8-9/PRGSS #10 210-190-137-5804 42,368.07 66,292.26 28996 05114/96 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE MAR PLAN CHECK SERVS 001-161-501-5250 3,030.00 3,0' vour"@2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 05 16:36 VOUCHER/CHECK.REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 28997 05/14/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM MAR PROF SRVCS-PARKVIEW SITE 210-190-626-5804 1,044.50 1,044.50 28998 05/14/96 001644 HILLCREST CONTRACTING, CHANGE ORDER #1-PW95-20 100-164-601-5402 5,711.00 28998 05/14/96 001644 HILLCREST CONTRACTING, CHANGE ORDER #2 PW-95-20 100-164-601-5402 1,193.40 28998 05/14/96 001644 HILLCREST CONTRACTING, CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS 100-164-601-5402 57,110.00 28998 05/14/96 001644 HILLCREST CONTRACTING, RET:WITHHELD PMT #1-PW95-20 100-2035 6,401.44- 57,612.96 28999 05/14/96 001343 HOWE WELDING & FABRICAT EMERG GATE REPAIR EMPIRE CREEK 100-164-601-5401 1,690.00 1,690.00 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST NETWORK PRINT SERVER 0132315 320-199-999-5221 1,250.91 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST TAX 320-199-999-5221 96.49 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST CITY HALL SERVER 320-1970 20,620.00 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST CRC/EOC SERVER 320-1970 24,203.00 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST FREIGHT 320-1970 62.29 29000 05/14/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST TAX 320-1970 3,473.85 49,706.54 29001 05/14/96 002258 J K Z CONSTRUCTORS, INC EMERGENCY GUARD RAIL REPAIR 100-164-601-5402 1,373.00 29001 05/14/96 002258 J K Z CONSTRUCTORS, INC BARRIER RAIL CONST-PW95-17 100-164-601-5402 6,687.50 29001 05/14/96 002258 J K Z CONSTRUCTORS, INC RETENTION W/H FOR INV 96-1-2 100-2035 668.75- 29001 05/14/96 002258 J K Z CONSTRUCTORS, INC CREDIT:HGURS BILLED INCORRECT 100-164-601-5402 112.50- 29001 05/14/96 002258 J K Z CONSTRUCTORS, INC RET:ADDED DUE TO CREDIT MEMO 100-2035 11.25 7,290.50 1 05/14/96 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSCOIAT FEB/MAR RDA CONSULT/LOW INCOME 165-199-999-5248 4,500.00 4,500.00 29003 05/14/96 002187 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR MAR 96 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVS 001-172-999-5255 3,207.92 3,207.92 29004 05/14/96 000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, APR PROF SRVCS/WINCH. BRIDGE 280-199-602-5804 5,153.00 5,153.00 29005 05/14/96 001658 LIENHARD CONSULTING GRO COMPUTER TRAINING ON-SITE 320-199-999-5250 4,800.00 4,800.00 29006 05/14/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER #1-SAM HICKS PARK 280-199-805-5804 2,891.36 29006 05/14/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION PRGSS PMT #4-SAM HICKS PARK 280-199-805-5804 67,990.70 29006 05/14/96 002164 MAHR CONSTRUCTION RET:WITHHELD PMT #4 SAM HICKS 280-2035 7,088.21- 63,793.85 29007 05/14/96 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO CONST.CONSULT. SRVCS/1-15 BRDG 280-199-602-5804 1,025.40 1,025.40 29008 05/14/96 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL, I TRAFFIC MARKING PAINT & MISC. 100-164-601-5218 2,900.00 29008 05/14/96 001339 MORTON INTERNATIONAL, I TAX 100-164-601-5218 224.76 3,124.76 29009 05/14/96 000232 NEET, JOHN P., MAI APPRAISAL SRVCS-FIRST ST PROJ. 210-1279 8,900.00 8,900.00 29010 05/14/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAR 96 RDA CONSULT SERVS 280-199-999-5248 4,659.55 29010 05/14/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAR 96 RDA CONSULT SERVS 165-199-999-5248 4,659.55 29010 05/14/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MGMT. RETREAT 4/4 & 4/5 001-150-999-5248 2,365.30 11,684.40 29011 05/14/96 001911 PALA MESA RESORT MGMT. RETREAT 4/4 & 4/5/96 001-150-999-5260 2,290.20 2,290.20 29012 05/14/96 000247 PESTMASTER RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED CONTROL 100-164-601-5402 2,575.55 2,575.55 2c" 05/14/96 001264 PRICE COSTCO, INC. 95 FINANCIAL ASSIST PER OPA 280-199-999-5276 167,877.60 167,877.60 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAC-C 3 05/02/96 16:36 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 29014 05/14/96 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC MAR DESIGN SERVS-PRKVEW STATIO 210-190-626-5802 4,303.39 29014 05/14/96 000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC MAR DESIGN SERVS-PRKVEW STATIO 210-190-626-5802 227.81 4,531.20 29015 05/14/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C NEW CITY HALL-BLUEPRINT REPROD 210-199-650-5804 2,895.51 2,895.51 29016 05/14/96 000267 RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT 10/95-12/95 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 001-171-999-5251 318,555.38 318,555.38 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5288 188,181.65 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5299 29,947.89 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5298 20,444.00 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5294 9,603.20 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5290 11,062.83 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5291 3,069.36 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5291 3,392-32 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5281 16,292.66 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5282 2,844.80 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5234 8,680.42 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFRCMNT PERIOD 1/18-2/14 001-170-999-5262 12,548.41 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RESOURCE OFFICER 1/18-2/14 K-8 001-1230 3,069.36 29017 05/14/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RESOURCE OFFICER 1/18-2/14 HS 001-1230 3,392.32 312,529.22 29018 05/14/96 001942 S C SIGNS PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS 001-120-999-5244 1,500.00 1,5C 29019 05/14/96 002191 SAN DIEGAN SAN DIEGAN GUIDE 280-199-999-5254 1,933.00 1,933.00 29020 05/14/96 002021 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI RESTROOM MAINTENANCE SERVICES 190-180-999-5250 1,591.44 1,591.44 29021 05/14/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA PROGRAMMING 4/1-3/96 320-199-999-5250 2,182.47 29021 05/14/96 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA PROGRAMMING 4/1-3/96 320-199-999-5250 754.45 2,936.92 29022 05/14/96 002047 SOIL TECH INC MAR GEOTECHNICAL TEST-S.HICKS 280-199-805-5804 5,121.75 5,121.75 29023 05/14/96 001179 TREBOR COMPANY INC., TH EMERG FLASHERS/PALA RD @ WOLF 100-164-602-5244 1,320.00 29023 05/14/96 001179 TREBOR COMPANY INC., TH FREIGHT 100-164-602-5244 110.00 1,430.00 29024 05/14/96 002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT 210-199-650-5804 4,675.00 4,675.00 29025 05/14/96 000329 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN DESIGN GUIDELINES 001-161-502-5248 2,652.00 2,652.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,221,973.60 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF VTWC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1 996 PREPARED BY: Steve Oakley, Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1996. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of March 31, 1996. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS:1. City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1 996 2.Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of March 31, 1996 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of March 31, 1996 Cash Activity for the Month of March: Cash and Investments as of March 1, 1996 $53,031,292 Cash Receipts 2,140,898 Cash Disbursements (1,887,293) Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1996 $53,284,897 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Institution Yield Balance Petty Cash City Hall $ 800 General Checking First Interstate (166,925) (1) Benefit Demand Deposits First Interstate 4,344 (1) Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 5.557% 38,634,554 Deferred Compensation Fund ICMA 289,439 Deferred Compensation Fund PEBSCO 420,168 Defined Contribution Fund PEBSCO 29,565 Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs First Trust 5.140 159,968 Reserve Account-TCSD COPs BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 502,690 Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds First Trust 5.140 1,075,374 Construction Fund-RDA Bonds BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 5.000 10,886,000 Reserve Account-RDA Bonds BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 1,448,920 $53,284,897 (l)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of March 31, 1996 Community Services Redevelopment city (1) District Agency Total Assets: Cash and investments $31,004,996 $ 1,901,468 $ 20,378,433 $53,284,897 Receivables 3,729,629 122,300 325,880 4,177,809 Due from other funds 539,101 539,101 Land held for resale 2,103,053 2,103,053 Prepaid assets 67,563 67,563 Fixed assets-net 592,029 592,029 Total assets $ 35,933,318 $2,023,768 $ 22,807,366 $ 60,764,452 Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Due to other funds $506,301 $ 32,800 $539,101 Other liabilities 3,894,147 $171,594 272,473 4,338,214 Total liabilities 4,400,448 171,594 305,273 4,877,315 Fund equity Contributed capital 1,055,344 1,055,344 Retained earnings 517,726 517,726 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 5,342,246 751,489 10,833,344 16,927,079 Designated (3) 20,777,726 1,125,614 11,668,749 33,572,089 Undesignated 3,839,828 (24,929) 3,814,899 Total fund equity 31,532,870 1,852,174 -22,502,093 55,887,137 Total liabilities and fund equity $35,933,318 $ 2,023,768 $22,807,366 $60,764,452 (1)Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds. (2)Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/mod housing, and debt service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, future capital projects, debt service, and continuing appropriations. EIA 5 APPRO\ CITY ATTOR FINANCE DIF CITY MANAC N CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Manager/City Council FROM:City Clerk DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION:Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details Accounts Payable 92-93 Payless through Temecula (Retention Code 40106). These records have been microfilmed in duplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibits 'A' as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS:Destruction of Records Request List of Records recommended for destruction JSG TO:City Clerk FROM:Kathy DiMeglio Records Coordinator DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of. Accounts Payable 92-93 Payless to Teme (Retention Code 40106) . These records have been microfilmed in duplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Finance Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The micro of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. to the reqlarements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent tc) the destruction of records under the @on of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. .. ... ..... .......... .... ....... 7: :7 .... . ...... .... ........ . . ..... .. .. Al ........... . . . . ... . . . R:\forms\dcstmct.rqs RRDESTY ... RRO61 City of T@ula Doc. Ref... 140 Page 1 04119/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code.... 40106 10:4i:37 Destruction Date. 05/14/1996 D I tern Ret. File Reference Storage PWis I Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/06/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 0097 Film 382INlAON3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01107/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 0098 Film 382IP41AOOO3 Group IV 140/120/The Vault - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 01/08/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 0099 Film 3821MIAO003 Group IV 140/i2O/The Vault 3 Records Processed ITEN4 6 APPRC CITY ATTOIR DIR. OF FI] CITY MMAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Manager/City Council FROM:Genie Roberts, Director of Finance@ DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Acceptance of Proposal for Audit Services for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director@ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the proposal from Moreland & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, to provide audit services for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998. DISCUSSION: On March 20, 1996 City staff distributed a Request for Proposal to 16 qualified firms of certified public accountants to provide audit services for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Separate technical and price proposals were received from ten regional, national, and international CPA firms. The technical proposals were evaluated by staff based on criteria such as the firm's experience with comparable government engagements, the technical qualifications and experience of each firm's personnel, the adequacy of each firm's staffing, and the audit approach and scope of work proposed by each firm. Upon review of the technical proposals, three firms were rated substantially higher than the others. The top three firms and the total three year cost proposals are as follows: Moreland & Associates Newport Beach, CA $ 53,100 Conrad & Associates Irvine, CA 58,088 Diehl, Evans & Company Carlsbad, CA 50,100 The above three firms were interviewed by a panel of City staff comprised of Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, Director of Finance Genie Roberts, Assistant Finance Director Tim McDermott, and Accountant Steve Oakley. The firms were evaluated on the basis of the qualifications of the firm and personnel, the performance of similar work, the ability to provide services, and the presentation of their audit plan and proposed scope of work. The conclusion of the panel was to recommend Moreland & Associates to serve as the City's auditors for the next three fiscal years. Moreland & Associates is highly respected throughout the State of California in the field of governmental auditing and accounting. Moreland & Associates is presently responsible for the audit of forty-three California cities and thirty-one redevelopment agencies, as well as many other governmental entities. The firm has served as auditors for the City of Temecula for the past four years, and has provided timely and thorough audit services and ongoing support which has assisted staff in maintaining a high level of financial reporting standards (as evidenced by annual awards received at both the federal and state levels). Moreland and Associates has proven to be very accessible to City staff as needed throughout the year to provide technical support, as well as to provide supplemental or special audit services when requested. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed contract amount of $53,100 represents an annual increase of 4% from last year's audit fee, and includes a 4% annual increase in fees throughout the term of the agreement. Appropriation requests will be included in the proposed operating budgets for the Finance Department and Redevelopment Agency for each of the next three fiscal years. ATTACHMENTS:Technical Proposal of Audit Services (Moreland & Associates) Sealed Dollar Cost Bid Proposal For The City of Temecula for Professional Auditing Services (Moreland & Associates) TECBNICAL PROPOSAL OF AUDIT SERVICES CITY OF TEMEECUIA APRIIL 5, 1996 TrrLE PAGE RFP SLJBJECR: CTRY OF TEMECUIA ALTDIT PROPOSAL NAME OF PROPOSER MO & ASSOCIATES LOCAL ADDRESS: 610 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SL= 840 NEWPORT BEACK CA 92660 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (714) 760-9788 NAME OF CONTACR PERSON: NUCHAEL C- MORELAND DATE: APRIL 5, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECNON PAGE Letter of Transmittal 1 Section I - Independence 3 Section II - License to Practice in the State of California 3 Section III - Firm Quahfications and Experience 3 Section IV - Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualffir-ations and Experience 11 Section V - Similar Engagements with Other Goverranent Entities 18 Section VI - Specffic Audit Approach 19 Section VU - Identification of Anticipated Potential Audit Problems 25 Appendix A - I-atest Quality Control Review Report Appendix B - Proposer Guarantees AppendLx C - Proposer Warranties 610 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 840 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 oreland & (714) 760-9788 m CERTIRED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 150 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 9WN (619) 431-8476 April 5, 1996 Genie Roberts Director of Finance City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 Dear @. Roberts: We are pleased to present this proposal of audit services to the City of Temecula. We have addressed each of the specifications included in your Request for ProposaL We have also provided significant information about our service approach to auditing. We currently audit the financial statements of forty-three California cities, thirty-one redevelopment agencies and many other governmental entities. Our success in providing professional services to your specialized industry is in part due to our dedication to the development and implementation of the accounting and auditing issues relating to governmental accounting. Our knowledge of your industry is best demonstrated by the fact that for the past ten years, over ten percent of the 'outstanding" awards in financial reporting issued by the California Society of Municipal Fmance Officers were issued to our clients. Additionally, appro)dmately ten percent of the Certificates of Achievement for Excellence in Fmancial Reporting issued by the Government Fmance Oflicers Association to California cities during the past ten years were issued to our clients. We are very proud of our part in these achievements. We have also achieved success because we understand that we provide a service to our clients. I have served California governmental clients for over twenty years. We provide an audit approach which satisfies all of the technical requirements without forgetting that we provide a service. We encourage you to verify our level of service as well as the availability of myself and Nfi. Serio, the audit manager, with the references provided in our proposal We think you win be pleasantly surprised at how highly our other clients also praise the quality of service we provide. Since we are not a large international firm, you will have easy access to each of the audit team members. I wiU personally supervise all phases of audit planning, detailed audit testing and report preparation. Throughout the year you should feel comfortable in calling us for advice. We are never too busy to meet the needs of our clients. Our clients rely on us to help keep them up-to-date on new developments affecting their industry, because they recognize our commitment to serving the needs of local government Briefly stated, the scope of services for the three years ending June 30, 1998 will include: - A financial audit of the City's Comprehensive Annual Fmancial ReporL - A separate financial and compliance audit of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency- - An expansion of the City's financial audit to meet the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1994. @. Genie Roberts Director of Finance City of Temecula April 5, 1996 Page 2 - A management letter containing our comments and recommendations for improving the accounting procedures and the systems of internal control for the City. The letter Will also contain any nonreportable internal control structure conditions. -A review of the annual calculation of the appropriations limit as required by Section 1.5 of Article XII[B of the California Constitution. -An annual letter to the City Council discussing the conduct of the annual audit process. Wehave the experience and the resources to complete the above scope of services within the time periods described in your Request for Proposal. The Proposer Guarantees and Proposer Warranties are included in Appendix B and C of this proposal. As you read through our proposal, we hope that you will recognize the philosophy we follow regarding our relationship with clients. We believe this is what sets us apart from our competition. Our philosophy can be summarized in the following concepts: -We recognize that our product is a service. -We are careful to consider the comfort level of our client's staff while maintaining professional skepticism. -We recognize that our work is accomplished by working with City staff, yet our client is the City CounciL Liliane Serio and I already have an in-depth knowledge of your accounting systems and procedures, as well as the personnel involved in those activities. Our knowledge of your systems and procedures will result in your staff spending significantly less time with your auditors. We think this should be an important consideration in your auditor selection process. Thank you for providing us the opportunity to present this proposal as we would very much like to continue as auditors for the City of Temecula. We sincerely look forward to working with you and other City staff- We would be pleased to provide any additional information or answer any questions you may have regarding our proposal. Our proposal represents a firm and irrevocable offer for ninety days. Very truly yours, MORELAND & ASSOCIATES Michael C. Moreland, Partner MCM:shn SECI'ION I - INDEPENDENCE Our firm and each staff member meets the independence requirement as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and the U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards. @ applies to the City of Temecula and its component units. SECTION II - LICENSE TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA The firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in California. SECIION III - FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND EXIFERIENCE ABOUT OUR FIRM Moreland & Associates is a large local firm of certified public accountants providing auditing, consulting and income tax services to numerous gover=ental clients. Our services are provided from our offices in Newport Beach, Carlsbad and San Francisco by thirty-five professionals and three support staff. Services to the City of Temecula will be provided by our Newport Beach office. Our firm and all of our employees are strongly committed to governmental accounting. AU of our thirty-five professional staff have municipal government auditing experience. Over ninety percent of our work involves services to local goverrunent clients. Mr. Moreland has held leadership positions and is currently very active in all professional organizations in California which deal with municipal finance. Much of his involvement is included in his resume, which is included in the next section of our proposal AU of the staff identified in this proposal are quite active in their commitment to governmental accounting, as indicated in their resilmes. They are all employed by the firm on a full-time basis. The level of staffing provided for this engagement is described in detail in Section VI. OUALITY CONTROL REVIEW Our firm has enrolled in the Quality Review Program offered by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Our most recent quality review was completed in May of 1994 and included specific gover=ent engagements. We received an unqualified opinion. A copy of the report stemming from this review is included in Appendbc A. Several years ago, the State Controller's Office completed a quality control review of our worldng papers supporting audits of two California cities. We were informed that we were the Ent firm they reviewed that "fully complied" with all of the professional and gover=ental standards when conducting audits of California cities. 3 There is not now nor has there ever been any regulatory action taken against Moreland & Associates. CURRENT GOVERNMENTAL CLIENTS AND DIRECTLY RELATED EXPERIENCE We have completed, or are in the process of completing, financial audits for the following governmental clients for the year ended June 30, 1995: -Cities of Agoura Hills, Baldwin Park, Bell Gardens, Bradbury, Camarillo, Chino Hills, Chula Vista, Colton, Covina, Culver City, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Glendora, Hawthorne, La Canada Mffitridge, La Mirada, @ Pahna, Laguna Hills, I-aguna Niguel, Lake Forest, Los tos, Mission Viejo, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Palos Verdes Estates, Perris, Pico Rivera, Poway, Rolling Hills Estates, San Buenaventura, San Marcos, Santa Barbara, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, Stanton, Temecula, Tulare, Tustin, Twentynine Palms, ViRa Park, West Covina and Yorba Linda, California. Twenty of these cities have been clients for over five years and the remaining twenty-three cities have selected us as their auditors for a three or more year period. -Community Redevelopment Agencies of the Cities of Agoura Hills, Baldwin Park, Bell Gardens, Colton, Covina, Culver City, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Glendora, Hawthorne, La Canada Flintridge, La Mirada, La Pa@ Mission Viejo, Montebello, Monrovia, Monterey Park, Perris, Pico Rivera, Poway, San Buenaventura, San Marcos, Santa Barbara, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, Stanton, Temecula, Tulare, Tustin, West Covina, and Yorba Linda. -Laguna Niguel Community Services District. -Rossmoor Community Services DistricL -Triunfo Sanitation DistricL -County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. -Santa Margarita-San Luis Rey Watershed Planning Agency. -Santa Fe Springs Public Improvements Corporation. -Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Agency. -Orange County Council - Boy Scouts of America. -California Inland Empire Council - Boy Scouts of America. -California Avocado Commission. -West San Gabriel Valley Consortiurm 4 - Orange County Cities Risk Management Authority (OCCRMA). -San Diego Pooled Insurance Program Authority. -Chino Valley Independent Fire District. -Orange County Fire Authority. -Fountain Valley Improvement Authority. -Santiago Library System. -Glendora Ubrary Authority. -Fullerton Ubrary Building Authority. -Fullerton Parldng Authority. In addition to the financial audits listed above, have completed the following: -City of Brea - Senior Citizen compliance audit. Special review of purchasing procedures. Review of a fired asset appraisal. -City of Del Mar - Performed limited reviews of admissions taxes paid to the City relating to the annual Del @ Grand Prix auto race. -City of El Segundo - Reviewed records supporting business licenses at selected businesses within the City. -City of Fullerton - Reviewed golf course revenues in order to determine compliance with the City's golf course management agreement. -City of Laguna Beach - Special review of City Treasurer's activities, and a Transportation Development Act compliance audit. -City of La Mirada - Transportation Development Act compliance audi@ and a special five-year review of certain Redevelopment Agency transactions. -City of attan Beach - Served as City internal audit staff performing reviews of various internal accounting activities such as cashiering, business license issuance and related cash receipts and fire department permit issuance. Also, annually reviewed admission taxes paid to the City in connection with a Virginia Slims tennis tournament. -City of Montebello - Various cash flow projections in connection with proposed bond issues, and a review of the accounts payable systenl 5 City of Oceanside - Community Development Block Grant audit, Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment Program Grant audi4 a long-term loaned accountant, a special review of the golf course operations, and a special review of cash cut-ofl City of Pasadena - Reviewed accounts payable system. City of Pomona - Evaluation of computerized systems and internal controls relating to their on-line utility bE&g systerm City of San Fernando - Business license tax audit. City of Santa Fe Springs - Reviewed tax increments allocated by the County of Los Angeles to each Redevelopment Agency Project Area since inception of the project areas. California Avocado Commission - Assisted staff in the documentation of accounting and budgeting policies and procedures. West San Gabriel Valley Consortium - We performed a management and operations audit of all of the major operating flmctions of the ConsortiunL We also developed procurement policies and procedures and a cost allocation plan. We have reviewed franchise payments and/or contract compliance from various cable and disposal companies for the Cities of Brea, Glendora, Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Mammoth I-akes, @sion Viejo, Newport Beach, Oceanside, Teme@ West Covina and Yorba Lind& We have reviewed Transient Occupancy Tax payments from some or all hotels/motels for the Cities of Barstow, Big Bear Lake, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Escondido, Hawthorne, Laguna Beaclt Lake Forest, Long Beach, @attan Beach, NEssion Viejo, Monterey Park, Newport Beach, Pomona, San Mateo, Solana Beach, Solvang, Sunnyvale and Torrance. DATA PROCESSING, AUDITING AND CONSULTING As you know, nearly all governmental entities today utffl= some form of electronic data processing equipment. Tberefore, our staff has extensive experience in auditing within an electronic data processing environment. During our evaluation of the internal controls over your major accounting operations such as cash receipts, cash disbursements, payroll, and fixed assets, we will determine the controls you have established over data processed by the computer. Subsequently, we Will develop audit tests to verify that the controls you have established are functioning as intended. 6 We utilize Lotus 1-2-3, a word processing program and several other useful software programs on portable computers as an audit tool on all audit engagements. The audit manager, the senior accountant and an assistant accountant to be assigned to the engagement will have extensive experience in efficiently and effectively u@g these computers on a variety of auditing and consulting engagements. Several years ago, we completed an evaluation of the computerized utility billing system of the City of Pomona. The study included an evaluation of activities in the Finance Department, Data Processing Department, Water Department and the Treasury Office. We have evaluated alternative computerized accounting software for several Cities. We assisted the Cities of Calabasas, La Canada FUntridge, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Lake Forest, Malibu, and Twen@e Palms in their implementation of new hardware and accounting software, which included training staff and developing policies and procedures for manual and computer processes. OTHER CONSULITNG SERVICES Our general capability to provide consulting services is best demonstrated by our many years of successfully serving the governmental industry as described in our resumes. We have completed management audits for the County of San Bernardino, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the Cities of Modesto and Long Beach. We provide a wide variety of consulting services to our government clients. Those services which are related to accounting or auditing or which involve finance department @ activities are performed entirely by our professional stafe Examples of these qWs of services are as follows: ùReview of business licenses, transient occupancy taxes, admission taxes, franchise fees, contract compliance, etc., 0Review and analysis of property taxes allocated by the County, 0Review or documentation of accounting policies and procedures, 0Special accounting projects, 0Internal audit department type services, and 0Loaned accountants. We performed a study to determine ff the internal control procedures were adequate and functioning properly within the Parks and Recreation Department of a large city. 'Me major systems reviewed were cash receipts/revenues, purchasing/accounts payable/contracting, and payroll for contract employees. 7 We also performed, on behalf of a governmental entity, a study of the administrative systems, procedures and controls of one of the largest temporary shelters for the homeless in California. The project involved the assessment of new and/or improved systems and the identification of the administrative positions responsible for monitoring the new systems. Part of this work was performed by Arroyo Associates, Inc. as a subcontractor to our firm. Arroyo is available to assist us ff necessary to meet your needs. GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Our Gover=ental Accounting Services Department is, in effect, an employment agency that provides temporary, full-time or part-time personnel who are experienced in governmental accounting. Our staff are available on a recurring basis each month to replace an absent employee on a full-time basis, or to complete a specific task or series of tasks. Whfle we can imagine a variety of recurring and nonrecurring projects which we can perform for you, there are many more of which only you are aware. Some of the projects we have performed for other goverrunental entities are: *Preparation of an accounting policies and procedures manual 0Preparation of the State ControBer's Report and the Street ReporL oPreparation of monthly bank reconciliations, investment reports and financial reports. 9Assistance in the preparation of the budgel oAssistance in the year end closing. 0Assistance in recording bond issues or monthly fiscal agent activity. *Grant accounting and analysis. 0On-caR staff from the Accountant to the Finance Director level. T'hese services are offered throughout the year at the same reduced rates regardless of the constraints of a "busy season". In today's jargon, we are providing you an opportunity to privatize certain flmctions within your Finance Department or to fill temporarily vacant positions. KNOWLEDGE OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES We have performed financial and compliance audits of numerous redevelopment agencies as listed in our resumes. You will also note in Mr. Moreland's resume that he is a member of the State Controller's Advisory Committee which developed the Redevelopment Compliance Audit Guidelines. W. Moreland, as Chairman of the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California Society of Certified 8 Public Accountants, advised the State ControHer's Office in the development of accounting systems for redevelopment agencies, revisions to the Compliance Audit Guidelines, and revisions to the Annual State Controller's ReporL REVIEW OF THE ANNUAL CALCULATTON OF THE APPROPRIA'NONS LIMIT Mr. Moreland was a member of the League of California Cities Gann Appropriation Limit Task Force. The Task Force developed new guidelines for the computation of the annual appropriations limit as a result of the passage of Proposition 111. Mr. Moreland, on behalf of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants, assisted the task force by developing the appropriate procedures and reporting in connection with the review of the annual calculation of the appropriations limit as part of the annual financial audit process. MANAGEMENT LETTERS We issue management letters every year in connection with all of our governmental clients. Unless there are unusual circumstances, the management letters are issued at the conclusion of the examination concurrent with the issuance of the audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Our management letters contain observations and recommendations which are meaningful to our clients. They are intended to be constructive and are in fact viewed in a very positive manner by our clients. Management letters are always reviewed in draft form with appropriate client personnel before they are issued. An immediate written report of all irregularities and illegal acts of which we become aware will be made to the City Manager and Director of Finance. ASSISTANCE IN RECEIVING AWARDS Each year, four of our staff participate in the review of annual financial reports under the Caldfornia Award Program. For the past ten years, Mr. Moreland has been a member of the final three-person committee reviewing reports under the California Award ProgranL During the past several years we have assisted the Cities of Agoura Hills, Baldwin Park, Brea, Camarillo, Chino, Covina, Chino Hills, Culver City, Cypress, Dana Point, Dinuba, Escondido, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Glendora, Irvine, La Mirada, I-aguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Newport Beach, Oceanside, Orange, Palos Verdes Estates, Pico Rivera, Placenta, Poway, Rialto, San Buenaventura, San Clemente, San Fernando, San Juan Capistrano, San Marcos, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, Temecula, Tulare, West Covina and Yorba Linda in receiving "outstanding" awards under the California Award Program. Most of these cities have also received Certificates of Achievement from the GFOA. For the year ended June 30, 1995, all twenty-one that applied to the CSMFO received "outstanding" awards in financial reporting. AD of the staff identified in our proposal have experience in preparing award-winning CAFR'S. 9 In 1990, Mr. Moreland developed a program entitled "How to Prepare an Award Winning CAFR" for the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. He participated in presenting the program on five occasions to over one hundred attendees. FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS AND THE SINGLE ALTDIT Today, nearly all goverrunental entities are receiving significant revenues from Federal and State grants. These revenue sources have become so significant that the National Council on Goverrunental Accounting (NCGA) selected the subject of "Grant Accounting" to be one of the first areas to be resolved in connection with the restatement of Govemmental Accountiniz, Auditing and Financial Rel2ortiniz, Mr. Moreland was a member of the NCGA Accounting Task Force which developed the exposure draft that became NCGA Statement 2, Grant- Entitlement, and Shared Revenue Accounting and Rel2ortiniz ]2y State and Local Governments. We have audited countless Federal and State grants in connection with the goverrunental clients we have served. Some of the grants we have audited include CDBG, CETA, FAA, FAU, FEMA, EDA, JTPA, OCJP, TDA, UMTA, Revenue Sharing, Senior Citizens' Nutrition, Child Development and Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment Programs. We have also audited numerous Federal and State grants in connection with school district audits. OMB Circular A-102, Attachment P, was published in the Federal Register on October 22, 1979, and became effective immediately. It provided for what is commonly called the "single audit approach". Because most local goverrunents did not comply with the single audit approach, Congress passed the Single Audit Act of 1984, which became mandatory in California for the year ended June 30, 1986. We performed single audits for the Cities of Montebello, Oceanside and Santa Fe Springs for the year ended June 30, 1985. Single audits were required for nearly all of our municipal audit clients for each of the years ended subsequent to June 30, 1985. AR of our single audits were performed in accordance with OMB Circular A-128, Audits of State and Local Governments. Mr. Moreland was a guest speaker on the subject of the Single Audit Concept for the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Southern Chapter meeting in July, 1982, and again spoke on this subject at the 1986 Annual Seminar in Claremont. In June, 1983, Mr. Moreland published an article on the single audit concept in Outlook Magazine, a publication of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. Our working papers will be retained for a minimum of three years. They will be available to the City, Federal agencies, State agencies and other parties at the direction of the City. 10 KNOWLEDGE OF NCGA AND GASB STATEMENTS AND INT'F-RPRETATTONS Mr. Moreland worked closely with three members of NCGA in connection with various goverrunental accounting organizations. Also, as Chairman of the California Committee on Municipal Accounting, he made an oral presentation to the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) on the governmental accounting issues which are most important in California, and has responded to all documents released by the GASB seeldng public comment. Mr. Moreland is one of four practicing CPA!s in the United States selected by the GASB to review and comment upon potential implementation problems in connection with proposed GASB Statements for smaller goverranental units. He is also a member of the GASB Task Force on the Financial Reporting Model. ASSISTANCE IN GOVERNMENTAL BOND OFFERINGS Today, because of the changing bond market and the changes in financing vehicles available to local government, goverrunental entities almost always u@ bond consultants in developing a financing strategy and the appropriate bond documents. When requested, we assist our clients in the review of the official statement in connection with municipal bond issues. We also issue consent letters upon request. Mr. Moreland and othersin the firm often have assisted in local goverranent bond issues. AVILITY Throughoutthe year you and your staff should feel comfortable calling us for advice. We should be viewed as another resource available to you in carrying out your @cial and administrative duties. We will contact you throughout the year to discuss how current accounting pronouncements may affect your accounting or financial reporting. We believe our ability to quickly respond to your needs and to keep you informed should be a significant consideration in selecting us as your auditors. Please verify our level of service and the availability of Mr. Moreland and Ms. Serio with the references provided in Section V. Our staff is, of course, available to provide accounting, auditing or consulting services throughout the year. SECRION IV - PARTNER, SUPERVISORY AND STAFF QUALJFICANONS AND EXPERIENCE Our audit team members have extensive direct experience in auditing governmental entities in California. We believe our individual qualifications will assure you of receiving the type of service we describe in this proposal We encourage you to contact the references provided below. We are confident that all of our clients are satisfied with the level of service we provide. Michael Moreland will continue to assume overall responsibility for services provided to the City. He will be supported by Lfliane Serio, who will manage the staff working in the field. Terry Cox will be the senior accountant in charge of the field work. Patricia Rives wiR be the quality control reviewer. Their resumes are presented below. We understand the City wifl retain the right to approve or reject staff replacements, if any. It is our practice to assign at least one staff member from the prior year's audit to be a member of the subsequent year's audit teanl RESUME OF MICHAEL MORELAND ENGAGEMENT PARTNER Michael Moreland will continue to assume overall responsibility for services provided to the City. Mr. Moreland has over twenty years of experience in performing financial and compliance audits for gover=ent. Some of the clients served include: -Cities of Bell Gardens, Beverly Hills, Big Bear Lake, Bradbury, Brawley, Brea, Calabasas, Canyon @e, Chino, Chino Hills, Commerce, Covina, Culver City, Cypress, Dana Point, Delano, Del Mar, Dinuba, Escondido, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Glendale, Glendora, Grand Terrace, Hawthorne, Irvine, U Canada FUntridge, IA Mirada, I2 Palma, Izguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna NigueL Lake Forest, Los Alamitos, Los Angeles, Lynwood, oth Lakes, Manhattan Beach, Mission Viejo, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Newport Beach, Oceanside, Orange, Pasadena, Perris, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Poway, Rialto, San Clemente, San Fernando, San Juan Capistrano, San Marcos, Santa @ Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, South I-ake Tahoe, South Pasadena, Stanton, Sunnyvale, Tehachapi, Temecula, Torrance, Tulare, Tustin, Twen@e Palms, Villa Park, West Covina and Yorba Linda, California. -Community Redevelopment Agencies of the Cities of Bell Gardens, Big Bear Lake, Brawley, Brea, Commerce, Compton, Covina, Culver City, Cypress, Dana Point, Escondido, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Glendora, Grand Terrace, Hawthorne, @ Canada Flintridge, La Mirada, I-a P@ Los Angeles, Lynwood, Mission Viejo, Montebello, Monrovia, Oceanside, Orange, Perris, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Poway, Rialto, San Buenaventura, San aemente, San Juan Capistrano, San Marcos, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, South Pasadena, Stanton, Temecula, Tulare, Tustin, West Covina and Yorba Linda. -Los Angeles Unified School District -City of @s Angeles, Department of Airports. -Cities of Los Angeles and Pasadena, Fire and Police Pension Systems. -Office of the Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools. -South East Regional Reclamation Authority. -Orange County Cities Risk Management Authority (OCCRMA). 12 Rossmoor Community Services District. Triunfo Sanitation District County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Santa Margarita-San Luis Rey Watershed Planning Agency. California Avocado Commission. West San Gabriel Valley Consortium. Central Orange County Fixed Guideway Agency. Orange County Council - Boy Scouts of America. California Inland Empire Council - Boy Scouts of America. Santa Fe Springs Public Improvements Corporation. Mr. Moreland is very active in organizations which relate to the public sector industry. His involvement includes: California Society of Certified Public Accountants -Cbairman of the State Goverrunental Accounting and Auditing Committee. -Member of State Controller's Advisory Committee for Redevelopment Compliance Guidelines. -Editorial consultant and author for seven years of a regular column on governmental accounting and auditing in Outlook Magazine, a publication of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) -Associate member-, regularly attends monthly section meetings and annual conferences. -Frequent speaker at section meetings and annual conference. Regular instructor at weekend training seminars. -Participates in the preparation and instruction of the Career Development Program "How to Prepare an Award Winning CAFR". -Participates in the review of annual financial reports and member of three- person final review committee under the California Award Program. 13 Goverrunent Finance Officers Association -Associate member and frequent instructor of Professional Development Programs. -Member of National Council on Goverrunental Accounting Grant Accounting Task Force which developed the exposure draft that became NCGA Statement 2, Grant EntitlemeniL and Shared Revenue Accountiniz and Rel2orting By State and Local Governments. Other Organizations and Activities -Chairman of California Committee on Municipal Accounting. -American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. -Member GASB Task Force on the Financial Reporting Model. -Member GASB Small Governments Task Force. Mr. Moreland received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Loyola Marymount University and holds CTA certificates from the State of California and several other states. Much of Mr. Moreland's continuing professional education requirement is fumned through writing articles and malting presentations on various goverrunental accounting subjects for GFOA, CSMFO and the League of California Cities. He also attends numerous CSMFO chapter and section meetings, as well as the annual conference. RESUME OF LILIANE SERIO ENGAGEMENT MANAGER Liliane Serio will continue to supervise the day-to-day services provided to the City. She is the manager responsible for the financial and/or compliance audits of many of our goverrunent clients, including the Cities of Bell Gardens, F-scondido, Izguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Perris, Poway, San Marcos, Solana Beach and Temecula. She is administratively in charge of our Carlsbad office. Her duties as an audit manager include: -Establish priorities and time and performance standards and prepare budgets. -Monitor the overall progress of financial and compliance audits and the staff utilized on the audits. -Prepare or review written reports of findings and participate in the oral presentations to management of the audited entities. -Research and resolve technical problems and sensitive reporting issues. 14 Review completed audits for - .compliance with generally accepted auditing standards, -compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, -soundness of reasoning and judgmen@ -reasonableness of recommendations to client management. Promote consistency in procedures and reporting. Prepare or conduct in-house training programs in governmental accounting and auditing. Actively participate in those professional organizations which have an impact on goverrunental accounting and auditing. Ms. Serio received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in Accounting from San Diego State University, and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California. She is a member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, an associate member of the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO), and is an active member of the San Diego Chapter of the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee. Prior to joining our firn3, NU. Serio worked for two years as an accountant for the City of Oceanside. Prior to that she worked several years with the County of Fresno Auditor-Controller's Of[ice. During the past seven years, @. Serio has attended numerous CSNTO chapter and section meetings. She recently attended a class in special district accounting and a GASB 10 update offered by the CSCTA as well as a class in advanced financial reporting offered by GFOA, and was a speaker at the CSCPA 1993 Goverrunent Forum. She has also attended and conducted in-house training programs on numerous governmental accounting and auditing topics during the past seven years, which are designed to meet the GAO requirements for continuing education. RESUME OF TERRY COX SENIOR ACCOUNTANT Ms. Cox will assume in-charge responsibilities for the audits of three or four cities this year. She has participated in the audits of the Cities of Chino Hills, Covina, Escondido, Perris, Poway, Temecula and Tustin. She has assisted with the @cial and compliance audits of the redevelopment agencies of several of these cities as well as the single audits of several of these cities. Additionally, she has been on loan to the Cities of Chino Hills and Glendora on a part-time basis. Ms. Cox received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from California State University San Bernardino. She receives about forty hours each year of continuing professional education. This is primarily obtained through instructing and attending in- house training programs which are designed to meet the GAO requirements for continuing education. 15 RESUME OF PATRICIA RIVES OUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER Patricia Rives will continue to perform the quality control review on all reports issued to the City. She has worked in public accounting for over ten years, serving governmental clients almost exclusively. Prior to joining our firm, she worked for another CPA firm which worked extensively in the field of governmental accounting and auditing. Some of the clients served include: -Cities of Agoura Hills, Baldwin Park, Banning, Brawley, Brea, Camarillo, Chino, Chula Vista, Colton, Cypress, Dana Point, Del Mar, El Segundo, Fullerton, Huntington Beach, Laguna Niguel, Manhattan Beach, Mission Viejo, Monterey Park, Palos Verdes Estates, Poway, Rolling Hills Estates, San Buenaventura, San Juan Capistrano, San Marcos, Santa Barbara, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Twen@e Palms and Villa Park, California. -Community Redevelopment Agencies of the Cities of Agoura Hills, Baldwin Park, Brawley, Brea, Chino, Colton, Cypress, Dana Point, Fullerton, Huntington Beach, Monterey Park, Poway, San Buenaventura, San Juan Capistrano, San Marcos, Santa Barbara, Santa Fe Springs, Solana Beach and Stanton. -Capistrano Valley Water District. -San Diego Pooled Insurance Program Authority. -San Diego County Cities Risk Management Authority. -Southeast Area Social Services Funding Authority. -San Ehjo Joint Powers Authority. -Orange County Cities Risk Management Authority (OCCRMA). -Chino Valley Independent Fire DistricL -Orange County Fire Authority. -Santiago Library System. -Santa Fe Springs Public Improvements Corporation. Ms. Rives is very active in organizations which relate to the public sector industry. Her involvement includes: -Chairperson Orange County/Ung Beach Cbapter of the California Society of CertifiedPublicAccountants GoverrunentalAccountingandAuditingCommittee. -Associate member of the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO); regularly attends monthly section meetings and annual conferences. 16 Participates in the review of CAFRs for the CSMFO Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting Program. Participates in the review of annual budget documents under the CS@O Budget Award ProgranL Member, Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Special Review Committee for the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Each year attends the Annual Conference of the Government Finance Of[icers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada. Ms. Rives received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a major in Accounting from California State University at Long Beach and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California. She is a member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO). Ms. Rives has attended numerous CSMFO chapter and section meetings as well as all annual conferences, and all GFOA Annual Conferences. In addition to the continuing education received at these meetings and conferences, she attended an AICPA Conference covering revisions to the GAO's Government Auditing Standards, and an AICPA conference covering an update of generally accepted accounting principles. She has completed the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Certificate of Educational Achievement program offered by the AICTA. Ms. Rives has also conducted in-house training programs on numerous governmental accounting and auditing topics. OTHER STAFF We will assign sufficient staff to the engagement to ensure the work is completed in a timely manner. AD of the staff assigned will have considerable experience in goverrunental accounting and auditing. Many of our professional staff have worked in government, so they have a good understanding of the level of service you expect from your auditors. There will be on-site supervision by Ms. Cox of all staff assigned to the engagement We have a policy of nondiscrimination in the hiring and promotion of personnel EDUCA'NONAI, PROGRAMS Our staff is continually expanding their knowledge of the goverrunental industry through formal in-house training programs, programs offered by the California Society of Certified Public Accountants and other professional organizations, and through on-the-job training. We believe this mixture of training techniques will provide you with a well rained staff to satisfy your auditing needs throughout the term of the agreement. We have also offered one-on-one training in goverrunental accounting to selected client personnel. 17 You wiR note from the resumes of Mr. Moreland, Ms. Serio, and Ms. Rives that they are extremely well qualffied to conduct in-house training programs for our stafe In addition, Mr. Moreland recently updated both of the major governmental accounting and auditing courses offered by the California Society of Certified Public Accountants, Audits of California Governmental Units and Governmental Accountiniz and Auditing U12date. SECIION V - SI@LAR ENGAGEMENT'S V= OTBER GOVE NT EN=ES As indicated above, we currently audit the financial statements of forty-three California cities and thirty-one redevelopment agencies. We selected the following five clients for you to contact because they closely relate to the proposed engagement and because they demonstrate our depth of experience. Mr. Moreland currently serves as engagement partner for all of the clients listed below. Audits Performed Client Name of Entiiy Telel2hone For 6-30-95 Since FYE City of Fullerton (714) 738-2520 City, Single Audit, June 30,1990 Mr. Glenn Steinbrink RDA, Ubrary Auth., Accounting Manager Parldng Auth. Air Quality Impr. OCJP Audit, Golf Course Review, Cost Allocation Plan This is a large city with one enterprise operation and an active redevelopment agency. There are approximately 1,200 annual audit hours. City of West Covina (818) 814-8438 City, RDA, Single June 30, 1992 Mr. Irwin Bornstein Audi@ Cable Television Finance Director T'his is a large city with three enterprise operations and an active redevelopment agency. T'here are approximately 1,100 annual audit hours. City of Montebello (213) 887-1412 City, RDA, Single June 30, 1986 Mr. Ted Nix Audit, Various Finance Director Special Projects This is a medium-sized city with three enterprise operations, an active redevelopment agency and several financing authorities. There are approximately 850 annual audit hours. City of Fountain Valley (714) 965-4418 City, Single Audit, June 30, 1989 Ms. E@beth Fox CDA, OCJP Audit Fiscal Services Manager 18 This is a medium-sized city with one enterprise operation and an active redevelopment agency. There are approximately 700 annual audit hours. City of La Mirada (310) 943-0131 City, RDA, Single June 30,1987 Mr. Richard D. Patton Audi@ TDA Director of Finance This is a medium-sized city with two enterprise operations and an active redevelopment agency. There are approximately 600 annual audit hours. CDACommunity Development Agency OCJPOffice of Criminal Justice Planning RDARedevelopment Agency TDATransportation Development Act SECTION VI - SPECIFIC AUDIT APPROACH YOUR OBJEC71VES You are selecting auditors to perform an audit of the financial statements of all fund types and account groups of the City of Temecula for each of the three years ending June 30, 1998. The City as a reporting entity includes the City of Teme@ the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Temecula Community Services Distric@ the Temecula Public Facilities Financing Corporation, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula, the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority, and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority. Each annual audit will be expanded to include the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, including the requirements of OM]3 Circular A-128. Also, each audit will include a compliance audit of the Redevelopment Agency in accordance with the requirements of the "Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies", issued by the State Controller's Office. You will require separate financ-.al statements each year for the Redevelopment Agency. Finally, we will review @.he annual calculation of the Appropriation Limit as required by Section 1.5 of Article MEB of the California Constitution, in accordance with the guidelines provided by the League of California Cities. Each audit of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the City will be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as adopted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and will conform with the guidelines set forth in the AICPNs Industry Audit Guide, Audits of State and Local Governmental Units. Also, the annual audit will comply with the standards for financial and compliance audits contained in the ' Government Auditiniz Standards, issued by the U.S. General Accounting Office, and the requirements of OMB Circular A-128, Audits of State and Local Governments. 19 We will assist you in preparing your CAFR in accordance with the most recent applicable pronouncements of the Goverrunental Accounting Standards Board. Additionally, we win work with you in preparing a CAFR that continues to meet the reporting requirements for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting issued by the Goverranent Finance Officers Association, and the Outstanding Financial Reporting Award from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. In connection with each annual audi4 we will review the internal control structure and accounting procedures in order to provide the City with a management letter containing our comments and recommendations for improving the accounting procedures and the systems of internal control as well as any norunaterial instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations noted during our audit and any nonreportable internal control structure conditions. We will initiate an e3dt conference to discuss drafts of our management letter and the various financial and compliance reports with appropriate City personnel. Following the audi4 we will meet to discuss any suggestions which either of us may have for improving the conduct of the annual audit process, or any other matters of interest. We will also issue a letter to the City Council regarding the conduct of the annual audit Throughout the year, we are available for meetings or discussions in order to meet your needs. During the audit process ff we become aware of irregularities and illegal acts, or indications of illegal acts, we will make on immediate written report to the City Manager and Director of Finance. We will follow the audit approach described below in order to meet all of your objectives and timing requirements. OUR APPROACH TO YOUR OBJECTIVES Our audit approach will emphasize service to the City. Service not only in terms of a qualified staff of auditors efficiently and effectively performing the necessary audit tests, but also service as an attitude maintained by the entire audit team. AU of our planning, audit tests and dealings with you and your staff will be performed from an independent objective viewpoint, yet we will never forget that our product is a service. We understand that the annual audit will result in a certain amount of additional work and inconvenience on the part of you and your staff. However, we are confident that our service-oriented audit approach will eliminate many of the common problems experienced in goverrunental audits, such as: -New staff each year, -Inexperienced staff who do not understand governmental accounting, -Auditors who feel free to interrupt your staff any time, and -Management letter comments made without a thorough understanding of the related costs or even the practicality of the recommendation. 20 We know these common complaints and can avoid them because of four very important facts, namely- -Our audit team members maintain their up-to-date knowledge of the goverrunental industry at the same meetings and seminars which you and your staff attend, -Many of our audit staff, including the engagement manager, have worked in government so they better understand your audit needs and what you expect in terms of service, -Our audit team members have spent many years successfully serving the local goverrunent industry, and -Our service approach to you will continue to be supervised by Nfichael Moreland who, because of his years of serving government clients, thoroughly understands the duties and responsibilities of you and your staff. AUDIT APPROACH - PLANNING AND INTERIM AUDIT WORK We suggest that an initial planning meeting be held prior to commencement of the interim audit work. Management of our audit team will meet with you and other appropriate City personnel to establish a good worldng relationship and to discuss the scope and timing of the annual audit, the detailed audit plan, the documents needed to update our permanent files, and the list of schedules that the City staff normally prepares in connection with the year end closing. Perhaps the most important objective of the pre-audit conference is to establish a relationship in which we all feel comfortable asldng questions and expressing our views. We have had this kind of worldng relationship in the past. We devote a considerable amount of time to planning each year, because we find that well-planned audits are completed in a timely manner. We will schedule approximately one week of interim audit work each year. Each year, we will update existing flow charts and other documentation of the internal control structure and of the major systems, such as revenue and cash receipts, purchasing and cash disbursements, payroll and personnel, fixed assets, grant compliance and investment activities. This information is gained through discussions with appropriate City staff and the review of available documented policies and procedures. Our knowledge of your overall internal control structure and of your major systems will be used to tailor our prior year audit programs to your specific systems. At this point we will u@ the prior year @cial statements, the current year budget, and our knowledge of your systems to determine materiality for audit purposes. This level of materiality will be utilized during the final audit work in deciding on the extent of testing of year end account balances. The review of these documents win also assist us in iden@g changes from the prior year in the operations of the City. 21 Each year we will select a sample of transactions to determine to what extent the systems are functioning as described to us. The extent of our sample size will depend upon our assessment of your internal control structure. The selection of transactions for testing will be made using a combination of random, systematic and hapha7-qrri sampling techniques. We will test the strengths of the systems to be sure they are functioning as intended. We will identify weaknesses, if any, so that they can be included with our recommendations in our annual management letter. During the interim audit work we will also develop the detailed audit plan, arrange for typing of confirmations, finah= the schedule for the completion of the final audit work, complete the hsting of client prepared schedules, and perform those tasks which can be efficiently accomplished prior to the fiscal year end. AUDIT APPROACH - FINAL AUDIT WORK During July of each year we will have a meeting to plan the final audit work- Together, we will determine that the year end closing is progressing normally. We will also discuss any matters which have occurred subsequent to the interim audit work which may impact our audit procedures or your financial reporting. The final audit work will begin about August 25th each year with an analytical review of revenues and expenditures, which includes a comparison of prior year financial statements and current year budget to the year-end trial balance to identify those accounts which win require further audit work based on materiality levels. The primary objective of the @ audit work is to audit the final numbers that will appear in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Upon completion of fieldwork and posting of any audit adjustments, we will perform a @ analytical review of audited balances to determine if our materiality levels have changed as the result of year end adjustments and to ensure that sufficient testwork has been completed. Each year, the fieldwork win be completed by the end of September. Our management review will be completed in the field during the same time period so that at the conclusion of the field work we have reached an agreement on both the format and the content of the CAFR. An exit conference will be held at the end of fieldwork to summarize the results of the fieldwork and to review significant findings. We believe you may want to set aside specific blocks of time to meet with us throughout the audit. @ will avoid being disrupted by questions, one at a time. We find that our work day is far more productive when we can plan ahead, and we are sure that well- planned days are also your most productive. As part of each annual audi@ we will evaluate the internal control structure in order to determine the nature and extent of our audit procedures. Frequently, this evaluation process leads to worthwhile suggestions for improving the internal control structure as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of accounting operations and procedures. AR of our recommendations will be discussed at an e3dt conference with appropriate City personnel and, ff appropriate, presented in writing at the completion of our audit We are available each year to present the various financial and compliance reports and the management letter to the City Councfl. 22 APPROACH TO THE SINGLE AUDIT Our approach to the single audit will begin with the identification of Major Federal Financial Assistance Programs from the list of Federal Assistance Program expenditures which you wiU provide. We wiU require a preliminary hsting in connection with our mterim audit work. At that time, we will identify the major accounting cycles such as cash receipts, purchasing and cash disbursements, payroll procedures, investment procedures, etc. which affect Federal programs. We will update our flow charts and/or other documentation of these accounting cycles and identify the internal control procedures which you have established. We will then perform tests of transactions for each of these accounting cycles in order to satisfy ourselves that the internal controls are functioning as intended. We will then work with City's staff to identify the systems you have established to monitor compliance with the requirements of the Major Federal Financial Assistance Programs. Next we wiE select transactions, reports, files etc. to test that the compliance systems are functioning as intended. We wiH complete the additional audit procedures in connection with the single audit during the financial audit process. Much of this work wiU be accomplished in connection with the interim audit work. It will be completed during the ftW audit work so that we can discuss drafts of the various financial and compliance reports at the time we are discussing the CAFR. REPORTS TO BE ISSUED - SINGLE AUDIT During the final audit work, we will complete any additional testing of Major Federal Financial Assistance Programs that may be necessary as a result of reviewing the final schedule of expenditures. We will then prepare drafts of the following for your review- -Auditors' supplementary information report on schedule of Federal Financial Assistance. -Compliance report based on an audit of the general purpose financial statements performed in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards issued by the GAO. -Report on compliance with laws and regulations related to major and nonmajor Federal financial assistance programs - general and specific requirements. -Reports on the internal control structure- 1) based on an audit of the general purpose financial statements and 2) used in administering Federal Financial Assistance Programs. -Schedule of findings and questioned costs, if any. 23 T'he above reports are all provided for in the AICPA Industry Audit Guide for state and local goverrunents. They comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984, ONM Circular A-128, the AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards No. 68, and the AICPA Statement of Position 92-7. After reviewing and discussing drafts of each of the above reports, you should prepare responses to any findings. The reports will be revised to include your responses and will be delivered along with the other reports. KNOWLEDGE OF APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATTONS We have a copy of the California Gover=ent Code and the Health and Safety Code in our offices for use as needed during the annual audit. We have included references to the more common laws, rules and regulations in our standard audit program for the usual activities of a California city and redevelopment agency. In addition, we utih= the "Single Audit Information Service" to maintain knowledge of the applicable laws relating to Federal programs. As part of our annual audit process, we will also ask you ff there are any unusual laws, rules, or regulations which relate to your City. KEY DATES FOR COMPLETION OF TT-IE 30.1996 AUDIT Presented below are suggested key dates for the completion of the June 30, 1996 audit: April 23, 1996 - City Council award of Contract. April 31, 1996 - Initial planning meeting, including discussion of prior audit concerns and the interim work to be performed. May 13 to May 17, 1996 - Interim audit work as described above. May 31, 1996 - Progress conference to discuss the year-end work as will as any problems noted during the interim audit work. August 26 to September 20, 1996 - Final audit work and management review as described above. September 20, 1996 - @t conference to summarize the results of fieldwork and to review significant fmdings. October 31, 1996 - Provide the City with comments on the CAFR and drafts of the management letter and the GANN appropriations limit letter. November 15, 1996 - Provide the required number of copies of the management letter and the GANN appropriations limit letter. 24 November 29, 1996 - Provide the City with comments on the Redevelopment Agency fmancial statements and copies of the letters on Redevelopment Agency compliance and internal controls. December 20, 1996 - Provide the required number of copies of the Single Audit ReporL ASSISTANCE BY CITY STAFF We wiU require assistance in connection with the annual audit by City staff in the following areas: 0Clerical assistance such as typing of confirmations, pulling of invoice packages and reproduction of agreements and other documentation for our files. 0Technical assistance in famili@g our staff with changes in the flow of information through the major and minor accounting cycles such as cash receipts, cash disbursements, payroll fixed assets, accounting for grants, etc. Also, technical assistance in connection with the overall activities of the Finance Department such as changes in the preparation and approval of journal entries, the reports generated by your computerized accounting system, and the schedules generated in connection with the year end closing. ùTechnical assistance in familiarizing our staff with changes in the controls you have established to monitor compliance with Federal program requirements. Since we wiR be assigning auditors who are experienced with your specific accounting operations as well as goverzunental accounting and auditing, we e'xpect the time required by City staff will be minimal- SEMON VII - IDENTIFICATION OF ANnC7IPAT'ED POTENTIAL AUDIT PROBLEMS At this time we do not anticipate any potential audit problems. 25 APPENDIEK A IATEST AL QUALM CONTROL REV.EEW REPORT GILBERT ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION Certified Public Accountants May 25, 1994 To the Partners Moreland & Associates We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Moreland & Associates (the firm) in effect for the year ended December 31, 1993. Our review was conducted in conformity with standards for on-site quality reviews established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. We tested compliance with the firm's quality control policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests included a review of selected accounting and auditing engagements. In performing our review, we have given consideration to the quality control standards issued by the AICPA. Those standards indicate that a firm's system of quality control should be appropriately comprehensive and suitably designed in relation to the firm's size, organizational structure, operating policies, and the nature of its practice. They state that variance in individual performance can affect the degree of compliance with a firm's quality control system and, therefore, recognize that there may not be adherence to all policies and procedures in every case. In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Moreland & Associates in effect for the year ended December 31, 1993, met the objectives of quality control standards established by the AICPA and was being complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards in the conduct of that practice. John E. Chaquica Gilbert Accountancy Corporation Certified Public Accountant JEC:sck 1760 CREEKSIDE OAKS DRIVE. SURTE 190. SACRAMENTO. CA 95833 o (916) FAX(916)641-2727 APPENDIX B PROPOSER GUARANTEES APPENDIX B PROPOSER GUARANTEES T'he proposer certifies it can and wiU provide and make available, as a minimum, all services set forth in Section II, Nature of Services Required. Signature of Official: Name (typed): Michael C Moreland Title:Partner Firm:Moreland & Associates Date: -April 5. 1996 APPENDIX C PROPOSER WARRANTIEES APPENDIX C PROPOSER WARRANTTES 1.Proposer warrants that it is willing and able to comply with State of California laws with respect to foreign (non-state of California) corporations. 2.Proposer warrants that it is willing and able to obtain an errors and omissions insurance policy providing a prudent amount of coverage for the willful or negligent acts, or on2issions of any officers, employees or agents thereof. 3.Proposer warrants that it wiU not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities under an agreement without the prior written permission of the City of Temecula. 4.Proposer warrants that all information provided by it in connection with this proposal is true and accurate. Signature of Official: Name (typed): Michael C Moreland Title:Partner Firm:Moreland & Associates Date: A@ril 5. 1996 SEALED DOLIAR COST BID PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF RIEMECUILA FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDRMG SERVICES A-PRIIL 5, 1996 610 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 840 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 oreland & (714) 760-9788 m CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 150 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92009 (619) 431-8476 April 5, 1996 I&. Genie Roberts Director of Finance City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Nfi. Roberts: Attached are the forms you requested regarding fee information. The total annual fees provide for approximately a 4% increase each year to cover increased salary and other costs. Our hourly rates also will increase 4% each year. Fees for additional services not quoted in this proposal will be billed at the standard hourly rates in effect at the time the work is performed. Fees for services provided by our Governmental Accounting Services Department are at substantially reduced rates. Fees for our services are billed on a monthly basis as the work progr Each of our bills will show details of hours and expenses in a format which is acceptable to the City. It is our experience that the audit process is far more successful in terms of client service, when there is greater involvement by those who possess extensive industry expertise. For this reason, both the audit manager and I will continue to have considerable involvement in your audit. Tbank you again for the opportunity to present this proposal. We hope we were able to convey to you our knowledge of your industry and the quality of service which we provide to our clients. Since we are obviously not the biggest, we have to provide the best service. We would be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to discuss our qualifications and fees. We would very much like to continue as auditors for the City of Temecula. Mr. Moreland, who signed this proposal, is authorized to submit this proposal and to sign a contract on behalf of Moreland & Associates with the City of Temecula. Very truly yours, MORELAND & ASSOCIATES Michael C. Moreland, Partner MCM:shn ALL-INCLUSIVE MA)UMUM PRICE FOR THE THREE (3) YEAR AUDIT PERIOD FISCAL YEAR ENDED 30, 1996 1997 1998 City's Annual Audit $12,400 $12,900 $13,400 Single Audit 2,300 2,400 21500 Redevelopment Agency 2,300 2,400 2,500 TOTAL $17,000 $17,700 $18,400 SCHEDULE OF PROFESSIONAL FEES AND EXI?ENSES FOR THE AUDIT OF THE 1995-96 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ONLY Standard Quoted Hourly Hourly Hours Rates Rates Total Partners 15 $110 $90 $ 1,350 Managers 42 90 70 2,940 Supervisory Staff 160 60 45 7@200 Staff 120 55 40 4,800 Other (Specify): Clerical 4 25 20 80 Subtotal 16,370 Out-of-Pocket Expenses: Transportation - 630 Total all-inclusive maximum price for 1995-96 audit only $17,000 ITEIN4 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC@ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Pete Labahn, Chief of Police DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Purchase of Computers for Temecula Police Department PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Temecula Police Department to purchase eight computers and monitors from Jaguar Computer Systems for a total price of $1 5,499, DISCUSSION: When the Temecula Police Department was incorporated, an immediate need for computers existed. However, adequate funding was not available, resulting in the Department receiving "leftovers" from computers being upgraded at the City. In addition to upgrading hardware, both the City and County have upgraded their software programs to the Windows environment, making the equipment at the Police Station totally incompatible with, and unable to run, the software. In order to address this deficiency, the Police Department budgeted for eight upgraded computer systems to be purchased and installed in Department workstations. Additionally, because Riverside County has an existing contract with Jaguar Computer Systems based on a competitive bid, the Police Department may take advantage of the competitive process and obtain computers which are compatible with those not only at the Station, but at the City and County as well. The proposed systems are Pentium 100 MHZ Processors manufactured by Gold Star Technologies, with a 15" monitor manufactured by Samsung, and other associated components. Pricing for these items may be found in the attached spreadsheet. These eight computers will supplement the existing level of County service provided through the City's contract with the County Sheriff's Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $15,499 have been budgeted and are avail able in account 00 1 - 1 70-999-5604 f or the purchase of these computer systems. Attachment:Cost Spreadsheet TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPUTER SYSTEMS COST SPREADSHEET TOTAL UNIT SALES UNIT TOTAL ITEM COST TAX COST QTY COST GST IntelTriton Pentium 1 OOMHZ Microprocessor w/8M B RAM, 250kb cache, w/volt re $759.00 $58.82 $817.82 8 $6,542.58 PCI/ISA Bus, 1.44 MB Floppy (installed in first slot), Mini Tower case, 230 Watt pwr supply, Fujitsu FKB4700 keyboard, MS-DOS 6.22, on board PCI IDE HD + FD + 1/0 Upgrade system RAM memory to 16mb 72 pin 70ns SIMM DRAM 139.00 10.77 149.77 8 1,198.18 Western Digital 830MB IDE Hard Drive 192.00 14.88 206.88 8 1,655.04 Mag. 15", .28 DPI Color Monitor 1024X765 377.00 29.22 406.22 8 3,249.74 Diamond Stealth 1 MB PCI Adapter 118.00 9.15 127.15 8 1,017.16 3Com 3C509TO 16 bit PCI 1 Obase-T network card (RJ-4S) 70.00 5.43 75.43 8 603.40 Workgroups for Windows 3.11 49.00 3.80 52.80 8 422.38 MicroSoft Serial Mouse and Mouse Pad 28.00 2.17 30.17 8 241.36 APC POW Surge suppressor low profile (PER 7) 66.00 5.12 71.12 8 568.92 $1,798.00 $139.35 $1,937.35 8 $151498.76 MAY-14-1996 12:37 FROM Y MICRO COMPUTERS TO 96941999 P.02 Valley Wilcro COMPuters Quote 41 Wg ViR Rd. #106 14-May-96 Tom@. CA 92590 TO- T la Police DepartmeM Po Nmber ftp oaiwwmm ShipMd Via Payment T Pending Paul 5 Days FDO Delivered Net 30 Days QTY DOSCiription Cost 8 100 s@ I,&%.OO 13200.00 Intel pentium I DOmhz pro r Intel Trkon PCI mothefboard vW 256 @line Ord)oard PCI IDE 110 (1 Pa@l, 2 @, I. Game) @xw 2 X 32 @ EDO Ram (I CM13 toud Teac 1.44MB Floppy Weaem DhM[ 860mg IDE WW Dfte Mau IV .28 OPI @r Mufii[fit, 1024 x 705 Diamond Stealth 1 mg PCI @r 3Com 3CS09TO 18bft I OBase-T NeMft Card oos 622 & W ps for VVinduws 3.11 MW=ft social Mouse and Pad NOni Tower Case APC Perwml Surge Ammd 7 owat Fujitsu Keybaord submal 13o=.UO Saim Tax 1,023.00 Gram Total 14=.DD Thr" (3) yew o"ft pans Three (3) ymr lawr vialloyM@-honomaliman@uiwwarmat@-,Ihamforalhe @omer nmW only deal with-Valley Micro for all warr=y Issues. c,wValley @ hm tho @ somw fcOlKy In the Valley. Our swff Mdudes 4 and I CeitWied Netware Enginew (CNE). we cDnsirtwW keep 3 @nicians in the field which allows servim Lime typically the same day. All se@ work g com@ whhin 24 houfz. Parnom teffns; Net 30 CJBYS pow 1 TOTAL P.02 . ITEI\4 8 APPR( CITY ATTO] DIR. OF Fl CITY MANA( CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Manager/City Council FROM:Ron Bradley, City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Funding for the Temecula Library PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appropriate funds in the amount of $2,500 from General Fund Reserves to the City Council Department Budget for expenditure to fund the payroll augment for the Temecula Library through June 30, 1 996. DISCUSSION: During the September 12, 1 995 Meeting, the City Council approved the appropriation of $1 2,000 matching funds to restore a 48 hour per week operating schedule at the Temecula Library. This funding matched equal amounts provided by both City of Murrieta and Riverside County, and was anticipated to allow the library to operate at its former schedule of 48 hours per week for approximately five months. Due to excellent fiscal management by the library's branch manager, the $36,000 augment enabled the library to operate at its former schedule for just over eight months, leaving only the month of June deficient for this fiscal year. Consequently, as of June lst, library hours must be cut from 48 hours to 32 hours per week if no additional funding is provided. At the Temecula-Murrieta Joint Task Force Library Meeting of April 26, 1 996, the Temecula Library branch manager stated that in order for the library to maintain current hours, a total of $6,000 would be required to continue the payroll augment to fund the extra 16 hours per week. In order to meet this requirement, the City of Murrieta pledged $2,500 from fundraisers; the Friends of the Library pledged $1,000 donated by the Rancho Temecula Area Women's Club; and the City of Temecula was requested to provide $2,500 to match City of Murrieta's donation. Once this funding is approved by the Temecula City Council, all contributions will be made available to the County for presentation at its May 1 8th Meeting, with a request to augment payroll funding for the Temecula Library through June 30, 1 996. FISCAL IMPACT: Council Department Budget for expenditure to fund City of Temecula's contribution to the Temecula Library is necessary to maintain the current library schedule. Funds are available in the General Fund Reserves account for this appropriation. An appropriation of $2,500 from General Fund Reserves to the City ITEN4 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNI FINANCE DIREI CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Approve Improvement Funding Agreement for Cost Participation in the Installation of a Traffic Signal at the intersection of Winchester and Roripaugh Roads. PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE Improvement Funding Agreement participating in a portion of the cost of installation and construction of Traffic Signal Improvements at the intersection of Winchester Road and Roripaugh Road and APPROPRIATE approximately $83,000 from the unappropriated balance of the Signal Mitigation Impact Fees account. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District and the County of Riverside, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the County of Riverside and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. BACKGROUND: At their April 23, 1996, public hearing City Council authorized cost participation with the TemeculaValley Unified School District forthe installation of a traffic signal atthe intersection of Winchester and Roripaugh Roads. The County of Riverside has prepared an agreement to be executed by the County of Riverside, the City of Temecula, and the Temecula Valley Unified School District which sets forth each agency's responsibility with regard to the signal installation. The agreement has been reviewed by staff and the City Attorney and is recommended for approval. -I- r:\agdrpt\96\0514\tvusdcou.nty FISCAL IMPACT: Signal mitigation fees will be used to fund the cost participation. The estimated cost at this time for design, construction, inspection and a 1 0 % contingency requested by the County is $124,000. The City's portion will be approximately $83,000. A more defined cost will be available after receipt of bids. Final accounting will occur after completion of construction and acceptance of the improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement--County-City-School District. -2- r:\&Sdrptk96\OS 14\tvusdcou.nty IN@y May 6, 1996 3:07pm--- Page 21 MCFARLIN & ANDERSON 241 P02 MRY 06 196 16:22 IMPROVEMENT FUNDING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 1996, by and among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California subdivision of the State of California (h referred to as 'C the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporatio (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public school district in the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "School District'). RECITALS County L-is ed to finance the co on and of public impmvements known as the Wmchester Road (Area 1) Projea (the we'); and City dewes to fimd a porbon of the cou of n and co@ction of the proposed @c sigw (the "SIVW Improvem@) kxaod get the inter@on ofrozipaugh Road and W' @; mW , School District @rm to fimd a @on of the cost of @ation and co@cdon of the SIVW Improv @ aM , C-mmiy, City and School @ct hglve det@ed that it wowd be economical and efficient for County to cause the S@ bWo to be co in conjunction with the construcbon of the Proj@ and , County, City mW School District @ to enter into an ent that wiU set forth how the design g and co@ction of the Signal Improvements are to be funded and rompleted, NOW. ORE, the pames hereby afee as follows: Recital.,t @ above r@s are true and correa. 2. @offinmneerinit i -. 7U SigcW Iniprovemeats have been designed by or under the direction of the @ct- @l has paid for all costs ed wtth the d@ for @ sWw improv . &hool @ct wffl caure to be delivered to County a complew and approved se of the construction plans for the, SWW Improvements that am to be in@rated into the bid plans and @cations for the Projed. 3. Biddinst and Com"cdon of S@ ent.,t- @ SigW Jinprovements identified and desm@ in @@ A hereto gW be off@ for bid by County and included in the bid @cations for the Project, aM a cow= mwed into by and the Monday, May 6, 1996 3:07 pm -- Page 3 MCFARLIN & ANDERSON 241 P03 MRY 06 '96 16:23 sM the loww bidder fDr tk co=ucdw @eof Said bidder Aa be to post the applicable labor, and performance bonds as @ forth in the @cafions @ co documents for the Proj@ the SISW Impro Upon award ofthe cowuuction co@ work " co and untd construction of the Signal Impirovements and the Project has been completed. C@ shall provide the amon and on fcw the co on and mga4bon of the s,FW @v City and School Du;tnct @ pay all dk:signlcn on and n cosu with the Signal lnqxo S. 4. by C and ChanL-e The County @ inspec;t the on and n of the SigW Aallpovmaft. TbarewMbea ction mect3ng with regard to the Preject at which a c for on of the Signal lWo be Any on fi= the, approved O= and @cations for the S@ Impro sW be approved by @ City and Mml in pncw to beimg ma&, such approval shall be evid@ by the of the City's and School Dishict's field repr (who shall be at smd on the change ordes- form. Any @ved @c to the plans and Sp - Ong ffig @ in an increase in the coxiti act price for the S@ 'ju sW be rcvi@ and approvcd by the City and School @ct prior to authorization and the cost of said will be paid for by City and S@ D@et. S. Funding of Si&W Im- s. (a) T@-five (25) calendar days priof to award of the oo on co@act for the Projed and the Si@ Impro wdl @ City and School of their propordonm @ of the cost of the SirW lWo Proportionate cosu Aa be based on pwd by City and one-third pwd by Sdml DistricL S@ Lnprov costs sW @ude dmgk on bid ed inspection f= and a ton percent (100/o) ofthe construction laid amount (b) W@ ten (10) calendar days of on of this Agrem@ School @ct Aa provide C@ and Cdy wrth copies of the design co =W @ award for uw by m the SWW bwov CDGS. Tbc costs of design paid, or to be paid, by Sd)ool District shaff be applied @d their proportionate share of the SigW @o costs. (c) W@ @ (30) days of @ OfthC CID CO@ City and Di@ will the fiifl cost of the SWW Inipmvcn=ts less the design @ paid by Di@. In the any c@ orden occur @ are approved by . City wW School @ct that ttic ten per@ (Io*/*) ency listed above, City and School District shall deposit wfficient fan& to (14)days ofthe approval. Tilln Pay the COST of the approved within f 2 imoriday May 6, 1996 3:07pm -- P ge 4 MCF@IN & ANDERSON 241 P04 MAY 06 '96 16-.23 (d) wiff cause t it to be p@ in an @ow to be held by the AD161 Fmg Agent for ffic of aw SIWW Improv cms as to @ progress pa approved by county for City's and School 's portion of the completed improv . Monies held in SW esa0w vnfl be inv@ bY the AD161 Y@ Agent. All and fim& vnU be pwd to City and @n mwkuon and @tance of ft SWW Improvwmts wW @ be paid based on than proporuonue @c of costs, two-thirds to City and o@third to School 6.Redlzrocal Ind@ification, (a) county @ the ot and hold @en City @ Scbool lhgnct and its r offi@ employem mW and m& and every one of th@ from and all actions, damag@ and of every @ and d@ption to which they may be subjww or put, by reamn o& ol- r from- (i) actions of County pur to tWr, t ww Cli) the co on of the Signal hwovem@ provWcA that nothmg m this @ @ m any m=er, City and District'3 @ any Of 's cm No Pro@n of d" @e=@ SIWI in any way @ the c4ent of the rewnsibi* of tile @t.v for pa@ of 'rating from its own opaations or the o@ons of any of its om agmu or emplorm. (b) Cwty and School DL-,tnct @ amme the defcnw og ind and hold @cm County and it3 repr e o@s, @loyees and ag@, and each and ev@ one of th@ from and afl actions. los= and of every @ and desmiption to winch @ uuy bc subjected or put, by not or r from: (i) actions of City and School Disuict to thir, and (ii) @gn and Of the SigaW DWrov provided. that no@ in this li shad @ m any s n@ any ofcity or School Disbict's co rs. No provmon ofths @ in anyway hnut the of the mwnabifityof the County fDr P of damages g from its own o@ons or the operations of any of its contractor agents or employew. 7. ovide For the period duri% which Couwy or its c,on@or(s) c-ontrols the job County @l provide, or mm to be provide for the period of co=uction of any of the SigW Improvements, a policy of woiters' com on mmmce and cOmPr@ve genffw @@ with covmse broad enough to @ude the on they have under the on and havwg a combuw sawe @ of @ffiq in the amount of $2,000,000 co@ City and School ]:)isWct's officem employees and agents as additionw eds. 3 AGi&T/in y May 6, 1996 3:07pm -- Page 51 MCF@ I N & 241 P05 MAY 06 196 16:24 or Mwed to be given by fts oir pr @@be to @ b= @@ gm if aW wh= wa by &a cim @ p~ to the ag fcdlom: To County.COUNTY OF II)E ve office 4080 L=wn StreM 12th de, CalifonAa 92501 Attcnbm: Grea TO Cit3r CITY OF TEUECULA of Works 43174]3t-siness Pak Drive Temecula, 92590 Att@on: J@ Kicak To VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT Department of Fa6lities @opment 31350 Rancho V@ Road T 92592 AttaWon: Dave 9. md @em. Thk &O mure to the of be bmdlng on carh to the and thew rs m4 amgos. 10. Effective Daic. This upon hffeof by the @ of S of the County and the City Council of City md tM Board of E,du@on of Scbool Di@ and by the execution by thdr r c @@ rcp 11. . This the @ the Wfies wrth respert to the mattas @ provided for and may ody be am=W by a ag ex by aU parties. This Agr may be in co ewh of which @ be d=ncd an ori&A but which togefficr a "c 4 AGVLT/tR IMonday May 6, 1996 3:07pm Page 61 MCFARLIN & ANDERSON 241 POG MRY 06 1% 16:24 IT SS OF, tM @es Wm have tbtis Agr as of "e mchcated above COUNTY OF IDE By: C BOW of Su rS ATTF-ST- Clerk of the @ of S A.PPROVED AS TO FORM-. C@ Counsd CITY OF TEMIECLIIA By- Karel Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST.- City Clerk APPROVIED AS TO FORM: Attomey to the City 5 AGI&T/171 IN@y May 6, 1996 3:07pm -m Page 71 MCFARLIN & ANDERSON 241 P07 MAY 06 '% 16:24 V @OOL DISNUCT By: c ATTF-ST: Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM-. Attorney to the @ct 6 AGULTn'm inoriday May 6, 1996 3:07pm -- Page 81 MCFARLIN & 241 POB MRY 06 16:25 IP, IT A @pfioln of SWW Improvements to be constructed by the County of River@ in conj withthe W Road (Area 1) Project: I .@ co@oger and cabinet; 2. sipg poles and mast arms; 3. signal heads, es and fi@g fi 4. loop detectors and ;and 5 aU@ to @s. A-1 @AGULTn7l ITEI\4 1 0 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNI FINANCE DIREI CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Summary Vacation of Existing Restricted Access Along the Northerly Side of Solana Way West of Motor Car Parkway on Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 23354. PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cressell, Principal Engineer Larry D. Cooley, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING A THIRTY (30) FOOT WIDE PORTION OF AN EXISTING RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF SOLANA WAY AND WESTERLY ADJACENT TO MOTOR CAR PARKWAY ON PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP 23354. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23354, approved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors, restricted access along the northerly side of Solana Way easterly of Ynez Road on parcels 4, 5 and 6. The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approved Parcel Map No. 23354 on October 4, 1 988, and it was recorded on October 5, 1 988. On March 4, 1996, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved the Shell Service Station project (PA95-138) with one (1) driveway entrance on Solana Way, necessary to provide adequate on-site circulation. The subject summary vacation of the existing restricted access along the northerly side of Solana Way is necessary to provide access to the Shell Service Station in accordance with the City and the applicant's desire. r:\agdrpt\96\0514@lana.vac/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution No. 96- 2.Exhibit 'A' - Parcel Map 23354 3.Exhibit 'B' - Location Map r:\agdrptX96\0514\solana.vac/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA SUMMAR]ILY VACATING A THIRTY (30) FOOT WI]DE PORTION OF AN EXISTING RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE NORTHERLY SI]DE OF SOLANA WAY AND WESTERLY ADJACENT TO MOTOR CAR PARKWAY ON PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP 23354. THE CrrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 - The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a. The Owner's Statement of Parcel Map No. 23354 provides that the Owner of Parcel 4, 5 and 6, will have no rights of access to Solana Way, except for the general right of travel. b.The Owner of Parcel 5 of Parcel Map 23354 (hereinafter "Owner") now desires directaccess to Solana Way. C.The City desires to effectuate the intention of the Owner by vacating a thirty (30) foot wide portion of the existing restricted access along the northerly side of Solana Way on Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 23354. d. The Streets and feghways Code, Section 8333, provides the authority for the City Council to summarily vacate an access easement if the easement has been superseded by relocation and there are no other public facilities located within the easement. Secfion 2. The restricted access along Solana Way on Parcel 5 of Parcel map No. 23354, as described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", is hereby vacated an shall no longer constitute an easement or right of way or other interest in real property of the City of Temecula and shall revert to the Owner. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. r:\agdrpt\96\05 14\solana.vac/ajp PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: - COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\agdrpt@96\05 14@lana.vac/ajp EXREBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- SUMMARI]LY VACATE A THIRTY (30) FOOT WI]DE PORTION OF AN EXISTING RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG THE NORTHERLY SI]DE OF SOLANA WAY AND WESTERLY ADJACENT TO MOTOR CAR PARKWAY ON PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP 23354. A 30 foot access opening in the northerly right of way line of Solana way as shown on Parcel Map 23354, said map on file in Book 152 of Parcel maps, pages 74 through 76, inclusive, in the office of the county Recorder, county of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: commencing at the centerline intersection of Solana way and Motor car Parkway as shown on said map; Thence along the centerline of Solana Way South 7501013411 West 145.81 feet; Thence leaving said centerline North 1404912611 West 50.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Solana way, said point being the center of the 30 foot access opening. r:\agdrpt\96\0514\solana.vac/ajp EXHILBrr "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96- I,OCATION MAP I?,4?' L- 30.03, Q- X50' L30.0.9 - R- 5o5o,t 112 I. 64' 1-06'00'33" 12 1150 L, i,2a & 5, PARCZL .3 3-0,5 4eRE4 4RO99 LoC-A-rloti AIAPI Zva/Ecr 91TE so PAPCEL 4 3. O& 4(!RE.4 OR095 t&7AeRE5 NET P4RCCL 8 I.3 3 ACRE-5 =S f ACRE# 4ROM 4CREO PARCEL .93 A e;rs TAWD k 54 AOS 01/At WAIC., .97ACRES 1-30. d-0'2"35"25' P-5ooo, L--,230-401 r--ii5.,2,2, (d zoef 36;Fl, I?= 5= 1) (L,,230.5 rzit3.15,) F-C2 I'LPNO T44 . DN g - 114 6 MONUJ4@14 T PER 54 / -?5 30. SET PM ?lol4 r E'-r4 Rz 12001 L ae,. -4w r:\agdrpt\96\05 14\so@.vac/aip ITEI\4 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Accept the Grant of Easement for Public Street and Utility Purposes at the Intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol for the Walcott Corridor Project PW94-1 0 PREPARED BY: p% Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES AT THE INTERSECTION OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE GIRASOL FOR THE WALCOTT CORRIDOR BACKGROUND: Prior to bidding the Walcott Corridor project, staff met with the property owner and his representative for the parcel at the south west corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol to obtain the needed right-of-way to construct the proposed street improvements. An easement document was prepared and reviewed by the City Attorney and acceptable to the property owner. Subsequently, the property owner changed his mind and would not grant the easement. An appraisal was conducted and an offer was sent to the property owner. On April 23, 1996 City Council adopted a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commence of eminent domain proceeding so as to acquire the Property. Consequently, the property owner signed the Grant Of Easement for the two (2) parcels. Once the Grant Of Easement is fully executed the City will have the right to start the construction of the street improvements at Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. 1 r:\agd rpt\9 6\04 23\ wal cott. eas FISCAL IMPACTM None. Attachments: Resolution No. 96- with Exhibit "A', inclusive. 2 r:\agd rpt\9 6\04 23\ walcott.eas RECORDED AT REQUEST OF AND WEEEN RECORDED TO: June Greek City Clerk City of Temeciiln 43174 Business Park Drive Tem@ California, 92590 F-FROM RECORDERIS i;@ pursuantto Government Code Sections6103 and 27383 GRANT OF F.A For valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ROBERT J. DROLET, a single man (the "Grantor"), hereby grants to the C= OF CUI.A, a municipal corporation (the "City") an easement for public right of wav purposes (the 'Easement") legally described in Exhibit A. attached hereo and incorporated he@, by @ re.@-enc-., subjer-t to the conditions, covenants, restrictions and reservations contained herein. 1. This Grant of Easement is made with respect to the following @.s which Grantor acknowledges as true and correct: a.Grantor is the owner of property in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly ed as set forth on @'bit B, at=hed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the. "Property"). b. Grantor to convey a temporary road easement to City for all weather st=t improvements near the intersection of Micolas Road and Calle Girasol. The condition also requires the temporary mad easement to be quitc@ed back to the Owner upon completion by the Owner of ent road improvements. 2. The Easement shall be a right of way and the public shall have rights of access and use consistent with the Easement's use as a public =wt. 3. The C i ty shall construct all of the n st=t improvements upon the Easement in accordance City s=@. LAX7-, =US C. 1 4.Tle Easement shall remain in full force and effect until completion by the Grantor, andacceptance by the City, of an approved alternate two land afl-weather route similar tothe improvements as proposed on the Walcott Corridor improvement plans P.W. 94-10 along the existing right-of-way of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol, satisfying all requirements imposed by law and the City for the construction, completion and use of same as a public street. Following acceptance by the City of the alternate roadway, and upon the request of the Grantor, the City shall quitclaim any and all interest in the Easement to the Grantor. IN S OF, the Grantor has caused this Grant of Easement to be executed, this @l@,@day of lggf.4, R,& GRANTOR @018ERT J. DR( -2- ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOV=G State of County L/ I C, On 19* before me, @v@ -,personally appeared ROBERT J. DROLET, a single man personally known to me -OR- ]2roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the pers on(@whose n;;me@ learn subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me @e)sh@ey signature94on the instrument the personrT4, or the entity upon behalf of which the person@ acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. executed the same @/ authorized capacity(im), and that by@ #lm7ms SIGNATURE OF NOTARY @c - @@ I COUNN MAY 1. IN9 CAPAC= C BY SIGNER INDIVEDUAL(S) OFFICF-R(S) (I=[S]): PARTNER(S) ATRORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRMING S GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR OT=: Si ENTINCZ: 124990.1 -3- CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPRANCE (Government Code @on 27281) THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property convey by the attached Grant Easement, dated May 14, 1996 from Robert J. Drolet a Grantor, to the City of Temecula, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council of the City of Temecula on May 14, 1996, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly autho@ officer. D 1996 CITY OF BY: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor 5 r:\egdrpt\9 6\0423\ wal cott.eas ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 Revised March 28, 1995 November 11, 1994 JN 400617-Ml7 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NICOLAS ROAD SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8847 Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 8847 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 37, Pages 37 and 38 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: PARCEL I (Nicolas Road) A strip of land 40.00 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: COMMENCING at a point in the centerline of Calle Girasol distant thereon South 24'01'40" East 375.33 feet from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown on said parcel map, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet through a central angle of 27'07'36" to the northeasterly line of said Parcel 4 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said curve northwesterly 139.87 feet through a central angle of 26'42'46"; thence tangent from said curve North 77'52'02" West 132.49 feet to the northwesterly line of said Parcel 4 and the POINT OF TERMINATION. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened easterly so as to terminate in said northeasterly line of Parcel 4 and northerly so as to terminate in said northwesterly line of Parcel 4. CONTAINING:0.250 Acres, more or less. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates Revised March 28, 1995 Nicolas Road November 11, 1994 Slope, Drainage and Right-of-Way Easement JN 400617-Ml7 Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 8847 Page 2 of 2 PARCEL 2 (Slope and Drainage Easement) A strip of land 75.00 feet in width, lying 50.00 feet northerly and 25.00 feet southerly from the following described line; COMMENCING at a point in the centerline of Calle Girasol distant thereon South 24'01'40" East 375.33 feet from the centerline of Nicolas Road as shown on said parcel map, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve northwesterly 142.03 feet through a central angle of 27"07'36" to the northeasterly line of said Parcel 4 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said curve northwesterly 139.87 feet through a central angle of 26'42'46"; thence tangent from said curve North 77'52'02" West 132.49 feet to the northwesterly line of said Parcel 4 and the POINT OF TERMINATION. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened easterly so as to terminate in said northeasterly line of Parcel 4 and northerly so as to terminate in said northwesterly line of Parcel 4. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that portion included in the afdredescribed Parcel 1. CONTAINING: 0.167 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT "Bo attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 P M. NO. P.M.B. 65-OF, PCL. I Z',4ZL,E i9lRA SOL 24',01'40',E .375 @' I M CL r,4BZE LIF 4clozIfRSE5 (D-,d=Z7',07',36' EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH SHEET / OF I SHEET TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION NICOLAS ROAD SLOPE. DRAINAGE AND @er? @iq, cwilliam @ost 6&@ssociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PLANNERS & SURVEYORS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE - SUI@E 250 - TEMECULA, CA PARCEL 4 OF P.M. NO. 8847 676-W42 - FAX 676-7240 SCALE FIELD BOOK JOB NO -T ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400 Temecula, California 92591 EXHIBIT nB" May 24, 1995 JN 400617-M31 Page I of I LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY GRANTOR That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 8847 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 37, Pages 37 and 38 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 527 30-S ITEN4 12 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT IL-CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:"No Parking" Zones on Pujol Street south of First Street PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer LO Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONES ON PUJOL STREET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'A' BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division received a request from the Temecula Police Department, POP Unit, to review the parking situation on Pujol Street south of First Street in the vicinity of the Community Center. Pujol Street in the vicinity of the Community Center is approximately 38 feet wide and on-street parking occurs on both sides of the street. In order to improve sight distances and visibility of the oncoming vehicles, parking should be restricted on both sides of the existing driveways as shown on Exhibit 'A'. To improve safety and the flow of traffic, the existing offset centerline will also be removed and restriped at the center of the 38 foot pavement width. On April 25, 1996, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission reviewed the proposed parking restriction and restriping and recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing "No Parking' zones as shown on Exhibit 'A'. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling Account No. 100- 164-602-5410 to implement the proposed parking restriction. r.\agdrptk96\514\nopkpujo.agn/ajp Attachmen=: 1.Resolution No. 96-_ 2.Location Map 3.Exhibit "A" - Proposed Parking Restriction r.\agdrpt\96\514@kpujo.nWajp RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON PUJOL STREET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AS SHOWN ON EXHEBIT "A" The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10. 16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No Parldng" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula on Pujol Street south of First Street, as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 2. The City Clerk shall cerfify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERS]IDE SS CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do cerfify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day of May, 1996 by the following roll call vote: AYES:0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES:0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN:0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT:0 COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ,:\agdrpt\96\514\nopkpujo.agn/ajp I @ z .d r_ I- @ --T ,A c, , L-. T, L.A PRIUAVEM ST 17P. @@O 0 1 E NORTH LOCATION MAP c NUTCH LM z 40' 20-1 >0 PRIVATE DRIVE -PRI VA 40, 38' 19,19, C) 40- 20 4 PRIVATE DRIVE 40- PRIVATE DRIVE 20' NIATCH LM EXHIBIT"A" PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTION AND STRIPING ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATI FINANCE H CITY MAI CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Approve Professional Services Agreement for City Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory and Appropriation of Funds PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer@-/ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Darnell and Associates, Inc. To provide traffic engineering services for the implementation of a City Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory for an amount not to exceed $40,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 2.Appropriate $40,000 from the unreserved General Fund to the Traffic Division Consulting Services Account No. 100-164-602-5248 BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division submitted a grant application to the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for a Traffic Control Device Inventory Project. The purpose of this project is to inventory and document all traffic control devices such as signs, striping, pavement markings, barricades, flashing beacons, street lights and wheelchair ramps on public streets within the City of Temecula. The collected data will be used to identify and eliminate deficiencies, schedule routine maintenance and prepare work orders to improve the efficiency of the traffic control devices within the City. Since the collected data will be on an electronic media, access to the information and continuous updating will be greatly simplified. OTS has approved the City's request and has allocated $40,000 for this project. Upon completion of the project, OTS will reimburse the City for all costs incurred up to the total obligated amount of $40,000. In response to the City's request for proposal for this project (RFP No. 037), seven (7) proposals were submitted. After reviewing the proposals, staff interviewed the three (3) top ranked consultants and Darnell and Associates was selected to perform the tasks as outlined in the request for proposal. r:\agdrpt\96\05 14\otsgrant.agn/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: A grant in the amount of $40,000 has been approved for this project by OTS and upon completion of the project the City will be reimbursed for the total cost of the project up to the obligated amount of $40,000. Therefore, $40,000 should be appropriated from the General Fund to Account No. 100-164-602-5248 for Consulting Services. ATTACHMENTS* Agreement -2- r-.\jkgdrpt\96\0514\ota@.a@ajp crry OF AG FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES CITY WI]DE TRAFFTC CONTROL DEVICE ORY RFP NO. 037 THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of 14th day of May, 1996, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Darnell and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on May 28, 1996 and shall remam and continue m effect until @ described herem are completed, but m no event later than May 28, 1997, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVIC-'F-';. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3.PF-RF'ORMANCF.. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best ofhis or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shallemploy, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices u@ by persons engaged mproviding @ar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PA a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Forty Tbousand Dollars ($40,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant @ not be compensated for any services rendered m connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are autho@ in advance and m wnting by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services m the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. -1- r! @\03 7\d amcll. agrlair) C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. invoices shall be submitted on or about the fim business day of each month, for services provided m the previous month. Payment shall be made within @ (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5.SUSPF-N',;ION OR TF@'RMINATION OF AC.RLF.FMFNT WRMO@ CAITI,RF@. a. 'fhe City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6.DF-FAIJT OF CONIRIJTTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City @ have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can termmate dm Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7.O@RSHIP OF DOCUMFNTIG. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall -2- ap't.;@ be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide fi-ee access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to @ Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. IND CATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any ldnd or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE RDZJIR , , . Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a.Minimum Sco= of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1)Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage occurrence form CG 0001). (2)Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3)Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. r: \rfp\03 7\dameU. aizrIsiD (4)Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's profession. b. Minimum limits of Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1)General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit -.s used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2)Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3)Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4)Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. C. Deductible@ and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other In-.gtirqnceProvi-,iong. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1)The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2)For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. -4- (3)Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officws, employees or volunteers. (4)The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5)Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after @ (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acc=@ility of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VH, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f. Verification of CoveraLe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person autho@ by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. AU endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10.INDFPFNDFNT CONTRACMR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. TFGAT, RIESPONI;TRTIYM-';. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall -5- -\@\017\,JR-,Il at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by faflure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12.RIFIF@AI;F- OF NMRMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project o.- property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTTCF-';. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mafling in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City:City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention:City Manager To Consultant: Darnell and Associates, Inc. Bill E. Darnell 1202 Kettner Boulevard, Suite 'B' San Diego, California 92101 14. ASI,;I('. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent -6- r. \rfnNO37\d smell. a p r/-:- of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only 'Rill 'F- - T)2rne_l I shall perform the services described in this Agreement. 'Rill 'P - T)@ may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Bill E. D@ from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LTCF@N'@;IF-';. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. C.OVFRNINC, T,AW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concenung tlus Agreement shall take place m the mumcipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 17.F-NTTRF@ AGRIF-IF@NtF@NT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding betweenthe parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. AU prioror contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO FXIFC17F, THII; AC.RF, The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN S F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMEECULA By Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor -7- T7 \rfr\037\d smell.alr 'air Attest: June S. Greek, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey CONSULTANT Damell and Associates, Inc. By By: -8- r!\rfr-\ 03 7@de mcll. a EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK CITYWIDE TRAFFIC DEVICE INVENTORY 1Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant. 2.Derive an action plan that will incorporate all key elements as determined in project kick-off meeting with City Staff. 3.Develop a computer base map of roadway network utilizing an AutoCAD, or compatible file type system, DXF Format. 4.Inventory all traffic control devices as defined in the project description above. 5.Develop a text file which correlates physical location with pertinent device parameters. 6.Any hardware upgrades needed to run the selected software will be provided to the City and accompanied by staff training. r:\rfp\037\037.rfp skg EXHD3rr B PAYMENT SC-HF-T)IJT,'F -10- r' @\03 7\d ameb. ag r/ajp Darnell &AssocIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COST PROPOSAL CITY OF TEMECULA CITYWIDE TRAFFIC DEVICE INVENTORY PROJECT Darnell & Associates, Inc. proposes to perform the services outlined for the not-to-excee(i fee of $40,000-00. The not-to-excced fee is based on tile following breakdown: Daniell & Associates, Iizc. Firm Principal 40 hrs @ $1 10/hr $4,400 Transportation Engineer 40 hrs @ $60/hr $2,400 Asst. Trans Planner 90 hrs ( $56/hr $5,040 Support 40 hrs @ $30/hr $1,200 Subtotal $13,040 Expenses Mileage $170 Computer Equipment $3,500 Report Printing $150 Total Darnell & Associates, Inc. $16,860 aCIilf Coiiipany GeoVista Data Collection & Development $21,000 ARCVIEW II Version 2.1 $995 Media Styler $995 WINDOWS 3.1 $150 Total ACIM Compan3, $23,140 GRAND TOTAL $40,000 This proposal includes three (3) years of maintenance on the GeoVista software. The maintenance statement in Appendix C of the proposal defines services to be provided. After three (3) years there will be a $9 nual cost. July 14, 1995 Bill E. Dameli, P.E. Date 2394Cost.cipi 1202 KETTNER BLVD 9 SUITE 6200 o SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 0 PHONE: 619-233-9373 3 HUGHES AVENUE 0 SUITE 416 0 IRVINE, CA 92718 0 PHONE: 714-768-2590 FAX:619-233-4034 ITEI\4 14 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE ILCITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Award of Contract for the Construction of an Interim Traffic Signal at the Intersection of State Route 79 (S), and La Paz Street - Project No. PW95-13 PREPARED BY: /0 Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1Approve the construction plans and specifications for Project No. PW95-13, Interim Traffic Signal at the intersection of State Route 79(S), and La Paz Street. 2.Award a contract for the construction of an interim Traffic Signal at the intersection of State Route 79(S) and La Paz Street, Project No. PW95-13 to DBX, Inc., in the amount of $84,036 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 3.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $8,403.60 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed for this project which includes installation of an interim three-way (3) traffic signal and minor signing and striping modifications at the intersection of State Route 79(S) and La Paz Street. This signal installation is considered an interim improvement since Assessment District 159 is scheduled to construct the ultimate road widening improvements which will necessitate moving the signal to its ultimate location. However, several signal components, including the controller can be utilized for the new installation when the road is widened. Since SR 79(S) is a state facility, an encroachment permit was obtained from Caltrans for work within the State right-of-way and all construction activities will be coordinated with a state inspector. The Engineers Estimate for this project was $90,500.00. -I- r\agdrpt\96\0514\pw95-l3.awd/AJP Six (6) bids for this project were received and publicly opened on April 25, 1996 and the results for the bid are as follows: 1. DBX, Inc $84,036.00 2. Paul Gardner Corp $84,924.00 3. Macadee Electrical Const $86,869.00 4. Lekos Electric $88,027.00 5. Peek Traffic $91,500.00 6. Sierra Pacific Electrical Contract $91,649.00 Staff has reviewed the bids for compliance with the City requirementz- 3nd DBX, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder for t-,hs project. DBX, Inc., which was also awarded a contract for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of State Route 79(S) and Margarita Road. We have also received excellent references from those who were contacted. The specifications allow 90 working days for completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in June, 1996 and be completed in November, 1996. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the '--Ity Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded +,-,rough Development Impact Fees - Signal Mitigation. Funds are a@,ailable for the construction contract of $84,036.00 and contingency amount of $8,403.6C. The total amount of $92,439.60 has been transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund and appropriated in account No. 210-165-659-5804. Attachment: Contract -2- r.\agdrpt'l@F @,@ I 4\pw95-13.awd/AJP CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECTNO. PW95-13 INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION @ SR79S & LA PAZ STREET THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of May, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: l.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-13 INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION @ SR79S & LA PAZ STREET, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1 992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications') as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-13 INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION @ SR79S & LA PAZ STREET. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-13 INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION @ SR79S & LA PAZ STREET. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. r:\cip\projects\pwgS- I 3\contract/ajp Th e Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW95-13 INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION @ SR79S & LA PAZ STREET All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. 3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. 4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHE@. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND THIRTY-SIX DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($84,036.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed NINETY (90) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonos and insurance are approved by CITY. 5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6.PAYMENTS- LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of -.-3 work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: S.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or an-@ r)art thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty 160) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. r:\cip\projectoNpw95-l 3\contract/sjp C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE $25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3% $75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount in excess of $500,000 8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000-00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. r.NcipNprojectaNpw95-1 3\contract/ajp Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of @@r,@_5.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contra,---, TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contra-t done at tt@e site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, @ - ,jainst any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations cond -ted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sc,@e active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CIT- 13.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrar-.,-.s that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor disD,.j:e is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, tc ;_ITY. 17,BOOKS AND RECORDS.. CONTRACTOR's books, zcords, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture @-id construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans at CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance r\cip\projects\pwgS- I 3\contract/ajp notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED:CONTRACTOR DBX, Inc. 42066 Avendia Alvardo, Suite C Temecula, California 92590 By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED:CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor r:\cip\projects\pw95-1 3\contract/ajp APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk r.\cip\projectx\pw95-1 3keontraWajp ITEI\4 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC@O CITY MANAGER I-,/ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 24136-1.(Northeasterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road) PREPARED BY: /@teven W. cresswell, Principal Engineer @ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, Subdivision Monumentation Bond, Traffic Signal Mitigation Agreement and Bond, and Fire Protection Mitigation Agreement in Tract No. 24136-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On May 21, 1991, the City Council approved Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24136-1 and entered into subdivision improvement agreements with: Bedford Development Company for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, subdivision monumentation, traffic signal mitigation fees, and fire protection . Accompanying the subdivision agreements were instruments of credit posted by Butterfield Financial Corporation in the following amounts: Faithful Performance in the amount of $938,500 to cover street and drainage, and sewer and water system improvements. Labor and Material in the amount of $470,000to cover street and drainage, and water and sewer system improvements. Subdivision Monumentation in the amount of $32,500 to cover required ties and monuments. Traffic Signalization Mitigation in the amount of $15,1 50 to cover required traffic signalization fees. r \agdrpt\96\051 4\tr241 36 I.chg Subsequent to the tract map approval, the development was sold to: Cal-Paloma del Sol, LLC, c/o Newland Associates, Inc. 9404 Genesee Avenue, Suite 230 La Jolla, CA 92037 A new agreement has been executed by tV.@@ Succeeding developer, and surety bonds have been posted by Insurance Company of the VVest herewith in the following amounts, replacing theinitial agreement and instruments of credit: 1 .Bond No. 147 78 6 i in the amount of $938,500 ($636,500, $160,500, and $1 41,500, respectively, for street and drainage, water, and sewer improvements) for faithful performance. 2.Bond No. 147 78 63 in the amount of $470,000(#318,250,$80,250,and $70,750, respectively, for street and drainage, water, and sewer improvements) for labor and materials. 3.Bond No. 147 78 64 in the amount --! $32,500 for subdivision mor,..knentation. 4 Bond No. 147 78 65 in the amount of $1 5,1 5-%- 'ir traffic signal mitigation. There is an agreement accompanying the traffic signal mitigation bond, and a Fire Protection Mitigation Agreement for $40,400 has been submitted w;lhout a bond. Staff recommends that the construction comple@- 3n date be extended to provide the new developer with sufficient time to complete the required public improvements. This extensio- would be to November 14, 1997. The affected streets, although not --ompleted or accepted, are Corte Villena, Corte Cardoza, Calle Galarza, Via Velis, Via Alirizo, Via Pola, and portions of Leena Way, Camino Caliari, Montelegro Way, Pio Pico Road, and Camino Gallegos. FISCAL IMPACT: Nor-e Attachments: Location Map Substitute Securities (On file) Substitute Agreements (On file) r%agdrptk96\051 4%tr241361.chg I-EENA yV4y C3)@ VICINI TY MAP TRACT NO. 24136-1 Location Map M. NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEI\4 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE FINANCE DIRE@ CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14,1996 SUBJECT:Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - Western Bypass Corridor Bridge over Murrieta Creek RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification No. 5-441-95) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign said Agreement. BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the proposed construction of Western Bypass Corridor/Murrieta Creek Bridge, City has applied for a permit to perform exploratory borings for eventual bridge abutments and supports within the Murrieta Creek streambed. Environmental Studies pursuant to Section 1 601 of California Fish and Game Code have been completed. Based on that study, it has been determined that minimal impacts to fish and wildlife will occur with the borings. This permit is to facilitate completion of the design work only. A separate permit will be issued for the construction of the bridge. The various mitigation measures are described in the attached agreement. Current provisions anticipate the completion of this phase of the bridge by December 20, 1996, with provision for extension of time of one-year, annually, if necessary. If the Department of Fish and Game agrees to such extension of time or other modification, it is the request of the staff to so modify the Agreement without any further action by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Agreement Department of Fish and Game and City of Temecula -I- r.\agdrpt\96\0514\m agr CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 330 Golden Shore, Suite So Long Beach, California 90802 Notification No. 5-441-95 Page I of 4 AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STRKAM OR LAKE ALTERATION THIS AGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Department of Fish and Game, hereinafter called the Department, and name: Joseph Kicak, title: Director, remres@:ating: City of Temecula, Public Works Dept., address: 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, phone: (909) 676-7000, County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter called the operator, is as follows: WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code, the Operator, on the 19th day of September, 1995, notified the Department that they intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed, channel, or bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) o@. the following water(s): Murrieta Creek of Riverside County, tributary to Santa Margarita River, located approximately --,5000 feet westerly of intersection of Front Street and I-15. Section 12, Township 8 S, Range 3 W, USGS Map Temecula. WHEREAS, the Department (represented by Dee Sudduth) has determined that such or7-ations may substantially adversely affect existing fish and wildlife re--urces including: those songbirds, raptors, other birds, ---als, reptiles, amphibians, plants, and all other aquatic resources and wildlife in the streambed/lake and associated area affected by the proposed project in this agreement. THEREFORE, the De=artment hereby proposes measures to protect fish and wildlife resources during the operator-' :, work. The operator hereby agrees to accept the following mea-@ures/conditions as part of the proposed work. If the Operator's work 7-anges from that stated in the notification specified above, this agreement is no longer valid and a new notification shall be submitted to the Department of Fish and Game. Failure -@o comply with the provisions of this agreement and with other pertinent code sections, including but not limited to Fish and Game Code Sections 5650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may result in prosecution. Nothing in this agreement authorizes @he Operator to trespass on any land or property, nor does it relieve the Ope--ator of responsibility for compliance with applicable federal, state, or local laws or ordinances. A consummated agreement does not constitute Department of Fish and Game endorsement of the proposed operation, or assure the Department's concurrence with permits required from other agencies. THIS AGREEMENT EECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DATE OF DEPARTMENTIS SIGNATURE AND TERMINATES December 20, 1996, for the pr3posed project only. The Operator may request an extension of the agreement annually for a 12-month period if additional construction time is necessary. The extension shall be requested prior to the termination date of the agreement. This agree-@nt shall remain in effect for that time necessary to satisfy the terms/condi@-ions of this :;greement. RECEIVE- APR 2 5 1996 CITY OF TEKOECLJLA LC-NGINEERING DEPARTMENT Pacre 2 of 4 (5-441-95) STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-441-95 1. The following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and resolved by this agreement. The signing of this agreement does not imply that the Operator is precluded from doing other activities at the site. However, activities not specifically agreed to and resolved by this agreement, shall be subject to separate notification pursuant to Fish and Game Code 1600 et seq.. 2. The Operator proposes to alter the following streambed: Murrieta Creek, to perform the following work: Drilling exploratory borings for eventual bridge abutments and supports, as described in the submitted application. 3. The agreed work includes activities associated with No. 2 above. The project area is located in the following streambed Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, located approximately as follows: 1,500 feet westerly of intersection of Front Street and I-15. Section 12, Township 8 S, Range 3 W, USGS Map Temecula. Specific work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the plans and documents submitted by the operator and shall be implemented as proposed, unless directed differently by this agreement. 4. The Operator certifies by signing this agreement that the project site has been surveyed and shall not impact any rare, threatened or endangered species; or the Operator certifies that such a survey is not required for the proposed project. If rare, threatened or endangered species occur within the proposed work area, or could be impacted by the work proposed, this agreement shall not be valid and the operator shall not proceed with the project until the Operator consults with the Department and obtains any required State and/or Federal permits. 5'. Drilling shall be performed in dry creek bed only, no vegetation shall be damaged or removed. 6. In those project areas where nesting birds may occur, the Operator either shall not remove potential nesting riparian vegetation from March 15 through July 30, or shall survey all potential nesting riparian vegetation within the project site for active bird nests. if an active bird nest is located the nest site shall be flagged or staked a minimum of 5 yards in all directions, and this flagged zone shall not be disturbed until the nest becomes inactive, unless otherwise directed by the Department (ref.: Fish and Game Codes 3503, 3503.5). 7. The removal or disturbance of soil, vegetation and vegetative debris from the streambed or bank shall not exceed the limits approved by the Department, or as described in the submitted application. S. Areas of disturbed soils with slopes toward a stream shall be stabilized to reduce erosion potential. Where possible, stabilization shall include the revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area. Planting, seeding and mulching is conditionally acceptable. Where suitable vegetation cannot reasonably be expected to become established, non-erodible materials may be used for such stabilization. 9. When appropriate, mitigation for the removal of riparian vegetation shall include the revegetation of suitable areas with desirable vegetation native to the area. All revegetation plans for both erosion control and mitigation purposes shall be subject to Department review and approval. 10. Vehicles shall not be driven or equipment operated in water covered portions of a stream or lake or in wetted areas, or where wetland vegetation, riparian vegetation, or aquatic organisms may be destroyed, except as otherwise provided for in the agreement and as necessary to complete authorized work. 11. If a stream channel has been altered during project operations, its low flow channel shall be returned as nearly as possible to pre-project conditions without ,creating a possible future streambed or bank erosion problem, or a flat wide channel or sluice-like area. The disturbed portions of any stream channel within the high water mark of the stream shall be restored to as near original condition as possible, except as otherwise indicated in the submitted application or as directed by the Department. Pacre 3 of 4 (5-441-95) 12. Fill length, width, and height dimensions shall not exceed those of the original installation or the original naturally occurring topography, contour, and elevation; fill shall be limited to the minimal amount necessary to accomplish the agreed activities; fill construction materials other than on-site alluvium, shall consist of clean uncontaminated soil, silt-free gravel, and/or river rock; except as described in the submitted application or as otherwise specified in this agreement. 13. Vegetation removed from the site shall not be stockpiled in the streambed/creek or on its bank. The sites selected on which to push this material out Of the stream should be selected in compliance with the other provisions of this agreement. Where possible, suitable brush piles may be left to provide wildlife habitat. 14. This agreement does not authorize the construction of any temporary or permanent dam, structure, flow restriction or fill, except as described in the Operator's notification. Any temporary dam, artificial obstruction, or other flow diversion shall be constructed from materials, such as clean gravel or sandbags, which will cause little or no siltation. If necessary, flow diversions shall be done in a manner that shall prevent pollution, minimize siltation and which shall provide flows to downstream reaches. Flows to downstream reaches shall be provided during all times that the natural flow would have supported aquatic life. Said flows shall be of sufficient quality and quantity to support existing aquatic life both above and below the diversion. Normal flows shall be restored to the stream immediately upon completion of work at that location. 15. Precautions to minimize turbidity/siltation shall be taken into account during project planning and implementation. This may require that the work site be isolated and /or the construction of silt catchment basins, so that silt, or other deleterious materials are not allowed to pass to downstream reaches. The placement of any structure or materials in the stream for this purpose, not included in the original project description, shall be coordinated with the Department. Coordination shall include the negotiation of additional agreement provisions. 16. Upon Department determination that turbidity/siltation levels resulting from project related activities constitute a threat to aquatic life, activities associated with the turbidity/siltation, shall be halted until effective Department approved control devices are installed, or abatement procedures are initiated. 17. Spoil sites shall not be located within a stream/lake, where spoil can be washed back into a stream/lake, or where it will cover aquatic or riparian vegetation. The Operator may remove all human generated debris, such as lawn and farm cuttings, garbage and trash. 18. Structures and associated materials, including debris, not designed to withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the high water mark before such flows occur. 19. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any stream channel or lake margin where petroleum products or other pollutants from the equipment may enter these areas under any flow. 20. The Operator shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall be the responsibility of the operator to ensure compliance. 21. The clean-up of all pollution spills shall begin immediately. The Operator shall notify the Department immediately of any spills and shall consult with the Department regarding clean-up procedures and requirements. 22. All debris, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, silt, cement or concrete or washings thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances resulting from project related activities which could be hazardous to aquatic life or waters of the state, shall be prevented from contaminating the soil and/or entering the waters cf the state. None of these materials shall be allowed to enter into or be placed within or Page 4 of 4 (5-441-95) where-they may enter or be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the state. When operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high water mark of any stream or lake. 23. All provisions of this agreement remain in force throughout the term of the agreement. Any provisions of the agreement may be amended or the agreement may be terminated at any time provided such amendment and/or termination is agreed to in writing by both parties. Mutually approved amendments become part of the original agreement and are subject to all previously negotiated provisions. 24.If the Operator or any of the individuals mentioned above, violate any of theterms or conditions of this agreement, all work shall terminate immediately andshall not proceed until the Department has taken all of its legal actions. 25. The Department reserves the right to enter the project site at any time to ensure compliance with terms/conditions of this agreement. 26. The Operator shall provide a copy of this agreement to all contractors, subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the agreement shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active work and must be presented to any Department personnel, or personnel from another agency upon demand. 27. The Operator shall notify the Department, in writing, at least five (5) days prior to initiation of construction (project) activities, and at least five (5) days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification shall be sent to the Department at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA 90802, Attn: Environmental Services. 28. The Department reserves the right to suspend and/or revoke this agreement if the Department determines that the circumstances warrant. The circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a.Failure to comply with the terms/conditions of this agreement. b.The information provided by the Operator in support of the Notification/Agreement is determined by the Department to be incomplete, or inaccurate. C.When new information becomes available to the Department representatives) that was not known when preparing the original terms/conditions of this agreement. d.The project as described in the Notification/Agreement has changed, or conditions affecting fish and wildlife resources change. CONCURRENCE: City of Temecula California Department of Dept. of Public works Fish and Game Joseph Kicak Dee Sudduth (signature) (date) (signature) (date) Environmental Specialist III (title) (title) I ITEI\4 17 APPROVAL CITY AT' FINANCE CITY MA CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Release Warranty Security and authorize Quitclaim of Remaining Parcel and Lot in Parcel Map No. 22629 (Northeasterly of Pauba Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Security for street and drainage improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629, AUTHORIZE quitclaim of Parcel 2 and Lot "D", AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the deed, and DIRECT the City Clerk to have deed recorded, and so notify the Developer. BACKGROUND: On October 22, 1992, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: Jack B. Koczarski 164 Lounsbury Road Trumbull, CT 06611 for the improvement of street and drainage, and subdivision monumentation in Parcel Map No. 22629. Securities for these obligations were posted by lien agreement and a grant deed for the property being subdivided, was granted to the City for that purpose. The secured amounts were as follows: Street and Drainage Improvements-Faithful Performance $34,500 Street and Drainage Improvements-Labor and Material 17,250 Subdivision Monumentation 1,210 The grant deed was executed and delivered under the condition that it shall be null and void upon the full and faithful performance of the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. r\agdrpt\96\051 4\pm22629.fnl On May 9, 1995, the City Council recognized the completion of the street and drainage improvements, authorized a reduction in the faithful performance security, directed the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents, and released the subdivision monumentation security amount. The following amount was retained as Faithful Performance Warranty Security: Street and Drainage Improvements $3,450 On August 8, 1995 City Council authorized quit claim of Parcels 1, 3, 4 and Lots 'A', 'B', and "E' in follow-up to their May 9, 1995 direction to the City Attorney to reconvey parcels held for Faithful Performance Security. Parcel 2 and Lot 'D' were retained as Faithful Performance Warrant Security. The one-year warranty period having been completed, Staff has reviewed and verified the public improvements. The Public Works Department therefore recommends release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Security amount in the amount of $3,450. The developer was also required to post Labor and Material Security to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. As there were no claims against this development, on December 12, 1 995, the City Council authorized the release of the Labor and Material Security amount as follows: Street and drainage Improvements $17,250 The affected streets are not being accepted into the City maintained street system at this time. The streets within the subdivision are portions of Via Telesio and Green Tree Road. FISCAL IMPACT* None. Attachmentse Location Map Quit Claim Deed for execution (On file) -2- r\ngdrpt\96%0514\pm22629.fni I 1-y ICO PARCEL MAP NO,, 22629 Location Map ITEI\4 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTOR FINANCE DIF CITY MANA( CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Award of Contract for FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs Project No. PW96-06 PREPARED BY: @q)) Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1.Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW96-06 to Chino Construction in the amount of $36,066.50 and authorize the Mayor execute the contract. 2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $3,606.65 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 1996 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for 95-96 P.C.C. Citywide Repair Program, Project No. PW96-06, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction. The bids were publicity opened on April 30, 1996. This project includes removal and replacement of curb and gutter, sidewalk, cross gutters and storm drain facilities citywide. The engineer's estimate for this project was $75,000. Seven (7) bids were received for the project and the results are as follows: Base Bid 1. Chino Construction $36,066.50 2. E.A. Mendoza 41,708.00 3. Utility Equipment, Inc 48,638.75 4. Hilicrest Contracting 51,363.00 5. SCW Contracting 66,287.40 6. Sean Malek Engineering 67,304.00 7. EBS, Inc 86,959.45 -1- r:\agdrpt@96\0514\pw96-06.awd/ajp The construction schedule is 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in May, 1996 and be completec by the end of July, 1996. A copy of the bid summary is a,.aiiable for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being f unded f rom the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 1 00- 1 64- 601-5402. The total project amount is $39,673.15 which includes the contract amount of $36,066.50 plus 10% contingency of $3,606.65. Attachme=: Contract -2- @-:\agdrpt\96\0514%pw96-06.awd/ajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW96-06 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of May, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Chino Construction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: l.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW96-06 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-06 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-06 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA- 1 r:\cip\projects\pw96-06\contract\ajp Th e Contract Documents are cc:-iplementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW96-06 FY 95-96 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerates and adopted by CITY. 3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment. and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed unce, the direct@on and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. 4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: THIRTY-SIX THOUSAND SIXTY- SIX DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS ($36,066.50), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-five (45) working days, commencing with delivery o. Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. 5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make oy written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6.PAYMENTS, LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such cata to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip\projacts\pw96-06\contract\ajp UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7.WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE $25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3% $75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount in excess of $500,000 8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. CONTRACT CA-3 r\cip\projacts\pw96-06\contract\ajp 10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, fro,-. the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him @.- by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. ii.TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage tc -,roperty, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACT-@ save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence @ole willful misconduct of the CITY. 13.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is net in any way associated with any City of@.Cer or employee, or any architect, engineer, c other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by !he CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors .ipon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which hF@ !:)een filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTA. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. CONTRACT CA-4 r\cip\projects\pw96-06\contract\ajp 17.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18.INSPECTIOL[. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR CHINO CONSTRUCTION 5342 Schaefer Avenue Chino, California 91710 By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED:CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projectr.\pw96-06\contract\ajp APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-6 r\cip\projects\pw96-06\contract\ajp ITENI 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council/City Manager FROM:Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW95-18 PREPARED BY: V/@@Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the construction of FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW95-18. 1.File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and 2.Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: The City Council awarded a contract for the construction of FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW95-18, to California Pavement Maintenance for $192,477.24 This project included slurry sealing, crack sealing, treating of all oil stains, and replacement of all stripping and street legends. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. r.\agdrpt\96\0514\pw95-18.acc/sip FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $192,477.24. The original bid cost of the project was increased due to a change in the actual field quantities of the crack filling operation by $2,390.41, bringing the total contract cost to $194,867.65. This project is a Pu--Ilc Works Annual Maintenance Project and is being funded from Account No. 100-164-601-5402, Routine Street Maintenance. Attachmenia: 1 . Notice of Completion 2.Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit -2- r. \agdrpt\96kO5l4\pw95-1 g.acc/aip RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1 .The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2.The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Calif omia Pavement Management to perform the following work of improvement: FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on April 9, 1996. That upon said contract the Reliance Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 95-18. 6.The street address of said property is: Various roads through out the City of Temecula. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of , 1996. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of 1996. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk APR- B-96 MON IOCIO CPM Co eAN ZXECO CITY Of TF-IAECULA, PUBUC WORKS DEPARYm5W-@ CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW95-18 FY9@9,6 @LU)MY S@L oj?oj.6cy Tili's is to "rdty @tCalifornia Pavement Maintenance Company 'CO@RACTOR'@ declares to the Citv qf Terniacula, under oath, that hefi-c has prid ii iull ior P-11 materials, supplies. IBbot, services, to6is, equipment. and all other bills c,,@ @aci:ed icy by &t@ CONYRACTOR oi by any oi the CONTR@CTOR's agents, employees or subconiraccors "-,aa;or let r,ontriblnion to the E-ui4.,@ution of it'& contract wlih the C @-V oi Yame--,,Ja,wiih rao@--rd to xha building,, ,erection, constructior. . or repair of that certain worl, oi improl,@ ' -,ani known z,,t @0- PWDS-'TVProject No. PW95-18, FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project situated in the City oi Temacuia, Estate of Cziiior6iz;, caoia pbr-ticularly described as follows: Project No. PV':-7-i8, FY95-96 Slurry Seal Project IWSF-FIY YIYLIE orr Woriv, HERE -rhe CONTRACYOR declares tha@ it knows of no unpaid debts or clain ConitactwnichwiDuldcons-citutogrounosi, anyxNtdp@ytoclairnz,.sxopnotices@,n,,;-rcizny unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACToft. @urther, in connection with -cha final paymenc of -tha Conxtact, the CC)@TRACCOFL @ara'oy dispuiez; tha following amounis: Dollat, @oui-it xc> c):A--Puca ascription F-ur--uant i(o Public Contvzct.% Code i7200,iha CONYRACTOR does hzta'Uy fui,@/ release racquix this City oi Yomecula and all agepis and employees oi the city, ana, each ei IFIain. f.,Oi-n any and all claimr., debts, demandc, or c4use of action which exis-E or might a@isi in iz-vot 0 -,na CONT@@-TOR by season of payment by the City of Yamecula oi ianv cont@c-cart-.ount wriicf YY'a COTATR@CTOR hz,:-. nor disputed abOV4. Daied:'AmpiriL.'L 15, 1996 Si@a ura @Tina B. Feeney.'Adminirtral-iUa Anczi-t-nt P,rint name and Yixl. 6192681529 04-08-c-@r 10:16AM P003 tt4 Bond Nubmer: B2618575 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORVS DEEAIITMEWT is KWOW ALL MEkd 13V YHESE IPAES@tv YHP.Y: California Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc. 9390 Elder Creek Road, Sacramento, California 95829 AIAU6 AND ADDRESS O-C @,U C'tDq Corporation f Bnd fl;JJ io whoihw -a at Mdj'vfdusb Reliance Insurance Company 10989 Trade Center Drive, Rancho Cordova, California 95670 NAA46 AND ADDRESSOF SUR@ @3174 usi@gisfpar D41@ ber@aftercallodl,,IJRErY,mraheldandfitmlybounduntoCl'rYOFTEMECULA,- emecuya. 1 ornkla ba(etnaftercelledelk"v't4ER,InthepanalMJMOf Nineteen Thouqand Two Hundred Forty Seven ----------- ---------------- ----------------------------- Z-0 uj v Tw Sevent o------------------- --------- 4 In lawful vysoii ey of d%a Ucilted S@Ld - -' @irid nOk la-' ;s iC"Ya 19,247.72 St!--P. Yhan: ten percent (1 0%) of the Contract v,-ilue payable by the srld OtV ei Tirnscula iincia( ihe (arms df the Contract, for the paymomt of which, we bind ourselves, succ@or,; and )Ojnt),V and severally. firmly by @e oresentt. - YHE R-OWDITION OF YHIS OBLIGATION it tuch @'t vjhiiraas, tha Pfir=il3ralsnta(ed into a a6rtain e4ntract with the OWNER, dated @ 1 1 th daV Oi April i9 96 -4 a copy Ci whi@ f@ hereto attached sind made a part hereof for the r-onetructior% of WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal WUI furkish a bond condi-rionad to eirdeantee fov the period of 2M Vear after approval of the final a:stimate oh said Job, by-tha OWr,.IER, 69stri,-E ,ail d6ftcets in workmahs4p ;and mate4als which may becornii appears durino said oadod:,Brid WHV.95AS, the said Contract has been completed, and was spi3roved oti 19 W,OW, Y14r:REFORe. 'YHE @Oil[HY]OIM OF YRIS 09UGATIC)W IS SUCI-1, lilax ii WiE'nit, C.,-ii, Y-gtt itOM the d2tO of approvalof the said Contract, tho work dam uiidat,,dnr. said Con-c(soi vzhall crisclose poor workmanship in the exac@ion of said wotlt, and the c:-:-reying out -Di tha,tE.Ifyts of Conlrac-t, or It shall appear that dafective mnte(tals were, furnished @roundG;, -(V-tn -tNs obriga'60@. shall remain In full force and v'krtue, otherwise -thit; lns%rurnent than ba void. h April 96. Sigk*cond"aladtNr. Ilt -devof Reliance Insurance Company PIIIWCIPAL California Pavement Maintenance Company, Inc. Jos H. Weber (Nam Attorney-In-Fact r-=onoA;c QF-PREIARY a Y., APpiloVED,gS TO iPORhq: STATE OF CALIF07NIA Sacramento COUNTYOF On . ............................ .. . .. before me, personally appeared g@i-adet ......... .h..Airoaa personally to me (or proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the per- sonks) whose name(s) is/are subscribed in the within instrument and CINDY SAMGAO acknowlee.Fed to me tha' he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their mm IMM4 LO authoriz@ capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their siguature(s) on the Wbry Pubric-Ca@ Principal Office in C instrument the person(s @rthe entity upon behalf of which the person(s) Sac-amento County acted, executed the instrument. My Comrr,,@ion Exp Oct. 2 1998 i WITNE@S my-ha-- -' --nd official seal./ ............................. ,Nc@pu ns document is @ a; an an] forrn-h;ch may b4 propt for t.- r %MT, .,I hv a@on @ imp k*d. as totheig3i vafi=yo( anyprd- ICAS and in noway acts. or isirtemead to ac'. as for th6 adv@ of an ator nay The of d*as not km any tA. a cabii-.y of thOS6 f@ in any %>ocirc tranza-@on. co, s F=m No. IOG -ACKNOWI PDG.%IENT-Generil (Ci%ii Code1189(a))(Rcri@@3) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALI]FORNIA Ss CoLLnty of @,,qrr,qMpnf-n On - April 11, 1996 before me, Mary F- A. MrT,ailghl in - Notary Public date here insert name and title of the officer personally appeared -Tngpph 14 Wphpr name(s) of signer(r) personally known to me (Mmnm to be the perso@ whose name(R) is/@ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h F executed the saxne in his authorized capacity@ and that by his signature($) on the instrument the personk), or the entity upon behalf of w@ch the person(xk acted, executed the instrument A.MCLAUGHU@N V7IT hand and official seal. COMM. #1078927 m rY P sltfomia Signatul RAMENM C-OUNTY (Seal) COMM. Exp. Nov. 29, 1 M (The balance of this page is intentionally left blank.) RELLA-NCE S-- COMIPANY RELL4,NCE INSURANCE COMPANY UNRMD PACMC INSURANCE COMEPANY RELL4,NcE NAnoNAL iNDEmNrry compANY ADMINISTRATIVE OFF@--E, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POWIER OF ATrOlMY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Uel- aware, and that RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE ;:OMPANY, are corporations duly orga@zad under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and that RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under @ laws of the State of Wisconsin (hareir- -c -ctiveiv called ' Companies') and that the Companies by virtue of signature and seals do he..-, constitute and appoint Joseph @ @abor, of Socrer--,,a-@-o, California their true and lawful Attorneylsl-in-Fact. to make, execute, seal and deliver for anc , their behalf, and as Tr@ act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and to binc 'he Companies thereby as fully and to the @,; @e extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the Companies and sealed and attested by one other of such officers, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that their said Anorney(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article Vi the By-Laws of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, and RE,-,ANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY which provisions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: AFrrICLE Vil - EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDEFTTAXINGS 1. The Board of Directors, ine Pfas@t, the Chairman of the Board, any Sormof Vice Pfoodent. any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors smaii have power and authority to (a) appoint Artomay4s)-in-Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company. bonds and unoortakings, torogruzances, contracts of noemn.ty and otner writings obligatory in tne nature thereof, and lb) to remove any such A"orney(s)-i@Fact at any time and revoke tne Lower ar.- utnority given to 2. Attornevis)-i@act shall have power wW authority, "act to the terms and imtations of the P@e, of A"ornv i@ to t mm , to execute deliver on b*nait of the Company, i>onds and undertakings. recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory n @ nature Vwoof. The corporate seal Ls not necessary for @ validity of any @ and undertakings recognizenc". contracts of nownmty and otner writings obligatory in the nature tnereof. gk"ornevisl-in-Fact shall have authority to execute affidavits r@*d to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity or other conditi-- - ...Vatmv unae,@, r,, they shall also have power and allthOrity to C*ndy vw financial statement of the Company &M to coolies at the By-Laws of the Company or any article or &=ion thereof. This e of Attorney s signed and sealed b@ -csimik urk$er and by authority of the follovarig resolution adopted by the Executive and Finance Committees of the Boards of Directors of Reliance Insurance Company, United Pacific insurance Cornoany and Rolume Na@ lndernruty Company by U@ous Consent dated as of 28. 1994 ww ay tne Ex@o and Financial Committee of the Board of Directors of Reliance Surety Company by Unarvmous Consent dated aadf March 31, 1994. -Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officws wW the seat of the Company miry be affixed to any such Power of Anorne, , any ConitwAt*S rOWting th*roto by facsomile.8-d any such Power of Attorney or cwbficate bowing such facsimile signatures or t@ile seal shall be valid and bUM%ng upon -,no Company and any such Power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsvnile semi &WI be valid and birubng upon the Company, in @ future with ro"ct to any bond or undwtsiung to which it is attacned.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed. this August 21, 1995. RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED PACIRC INSURANCE COMPANY RELLKNCE NA'NONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF King Ss. On this, August 21, 1995, before me, Janet Blankley, personally appeared Lawrence W. Cadstrom, who acknowledged himself to be the Senior Vice Presio--.t of the Reliance Surety Company, and the Vice President of Reliance Insurance Company, United Pacific Insurance Company, and Reliance National Indemnity Company and that as such, bein do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself as fficer. In witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. blic ir and for the State of We ngton at Pu,@allup 1, Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMP- ANY, and RELIANCE NATICNAL INDEMNITY COMPANY do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said '@ompanies, which is still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have --ereunto set my @and and affixed the seals of said Companies this I I t-h day of Apri 1 19 q6. Assistant Secretary THE PAVEMENT M A I N T E N A N C E COMPANY April 15, 1996 City of Temecula Dept of Public Works 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 REProject No. PW95-18 FY 95-96 Slurry Sea] Project Enclosedis the Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release and the Maintenance Bond as requested. If you have any questions, please contact me at 916 381-8033 ext. 112. Sincerely, Cindy Sapigao Contract Administrator Enc. California Pavement maintenance company, Inc. .9390 Elder Creek Road - Sacramento, CA 95829 (916)381-8033 - Fax (916) 381-3703 - California License 374514 ITEN4 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE FINANCE DIRE( CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:All-Way "Stop" Controls in Starlight Ridge PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer @cv RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'STOP' CONTROLS (COSMIC DRIVE AT SANTA CECILIA DRIVE, SANTA CECILIA DRIVE AT AGENA STREET, AGENA STREET AT COSMIC DRIVE) BACKGROUND: At the April 23, 1996 City Council meeting, staff was requested to process the required documents needed to legally enforce all-way stops at three (3) locations in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. The attached resolution satisfies City requirements to post and enforce these all-way stop controls. The intersection of Cosmic Drive and Santa Cecilia Drive is currently an uncontrolled "Tee" intersection between two (2) residential collector streets. Staff recommends supplementing the stop by placing a 'Stop Ahead' sign on the northerly approach to this intersection due to the roadway alignments. The intersection of Santa Cecilia Drive and Agena Street is currently an uncontrolled four-way intersection between a residential collector street and a residential local street. Staff recommends placing a 'Stop Ahead" sign on the northern approach to this intersection to provide advanced notice of the stop controls. The intersection of Agena Street and Cosmic Drive is currently an uncontrolled 'Tee" intersection between a residential collector street and a street that transitions from a residential collector to a residential local street. Staff recommends placing 'Stop Ahead" signs on all approaches to this intersection based on roadway alignments and to provide advanced warning of the stop controls. r:\agdrpt\9i6\0514\atopcouL agn/ajp Exhibit "A" shows the proposed placement of both 'Stop' and "Stop Ahead" si -.,-Is for all three (3) intersections in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. FISCAL IMPACT: 1 0 "Stop' Signs with Limit Lines at $1 50 each $1,500-00 5 "Stop Ahead" signs at $1 25 each 625.00 TOTAL $2,125.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution 96- 2.Location Map 3.Exhibit "A' r: \agd rpt\96\05 14\stopc onL gtgn/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP" CONTROLS (COSMIC DRIVE AT SANTA CECILIA DRIVE, SANTA CECILIA DRIVE AT AGENA STREET, AGENA STREET AT COSMIC DRIVE) The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10. 12. 100 of the Municipal Code, the following "STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula. A.Eastbound Santa Cecilia Drive at Cosmic Drive B.Northbound Cosmic Drive at Santa Cecilia Drive C.Southbound Cosmic Drive at Santa Cecilia Drive D.Eastbound Santa Cecilia Drive at Agena Street E.Westbound Santa Cecilia Drive at Agena Street F.Northbound Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive G.Southbound Agena Street at Santa Cecilia Drive H.Eastbound Agena Street at Cosmic Drive 1.Westbound Agena Street at Cosmic Drive J.Southbound Cosmic Drive at Agena Street Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor -3- r\agdrpt\96\0514@nLagn/ajp ATMT: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, Citv Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califoniia, do hereby ce@ that Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adc--,izd by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of May, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: - COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: - COUNCIILMEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCIILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEMBERS: r.\agdrpt\96\0514 aWRip i- C) li 4 C) u -Lf I I JE Iz -e C4 C) '1114 ITEI\4 21 APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANC@ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official@ DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Adjustment of Certain Costs Related to Weed Abatement RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize staff to adjust the annually established per parcel administrative costs related to the abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant parcels within the city boundaries, when: A.Written request is made to the Building Official; B.Two or more abated parcels are contiguous; 1)Up to three (3) contiguous parcels: One (1) administrative fee to be charged. 2)Four (4) or more contiguous parcels: One (1) administrative fee to be charged per four (4) parcels. C.The contiguous parcels are under the same ownership. DISCUSSION: The City's Annual Weed Abatement Program involves approximately 1200 vacant parcels of land within the city boundaries. Staff has been approached by a property owner that owns contiguous parcels with a request for some relief from the per-parcel administrative costs which average approximately $260.00 and are typically charged to each parcel when city caused abatement procedures have been performed. These administrative charges were levied for abatement and lien processing during Fiscal Years '92-'93 through '94-'95 and approved by the City Council for each of these periods. Staff has looked into this case and found that there are several locations in the City where consideration is reasonable. Therefore, it is the intent of this recommendation that the City Council permit the Building Official to consider each request based upon the above recommended criteria. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This recommendation only provides a method of establishing administrative charges which are reasonable for recovery of costs to the City for hazardous vegetation abatement for single-owner contiguous parcels. V:\Ag.nda\we.d...t.adi ITE?\4 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTOR DIRE T R 0 CITY MANA( CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Opposition to AB 3053 RECOMMENDATION: 1.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OPPOSING AD 3M, WHICH WOULD BAR THE CITY FROM GENERATING NEW DEVELOPMENT REVENUES. BACKGROUND: AB 3053 would convert any development tax, condition, or other monetary charge into a development fee. Although the City of Temecula does not impose a development tax, the City's ability to raise revenues to build roads, infrastructure and other development- related improvements would be severely curtailed. AB 3053 contains a number of limitations on cities' ability to raise revenues: unconstitutionally eliminates both charter and general law city taxing authority over development limits the ability to raise revenues for long term growth and capital improvements unconstitutionally impairs existing contracts and development agreements by canceling any development revenue agreements greater than the actual cost of short term direct costs eliminates the rights of voters to enact general fund taxes on development. By exempting themselves from all excise and other fees, builders invite all industries to come to the legislature and create similar exemptions. Next, the hotel industry will want to be exempt from transient occupancy taxes that go beyond the costs of promoting tourism, the entertainment industry will want to be exempt from ticket taxes and so forth. Cities will have their existing limited revenue streams decimated. R \LANIEFLDA\REP'ORTSTAFF33.MIS in addition to barring the City from a potential revenue source, AB 3053 amounts to another unfunded state mandate. Cities would be required to establish an 'individual determination' on a project by project basis for the assessment of infrastructure fees. City staff would be required to perform this work without state funding to offset this expense. Finally, AB 3053 is another attempt by the legislature to erode local control by limiting the City's ability to independently raise revenues. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this action. R-'@IEFDA@PORT,-AFF33.MIS RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF TIE[E CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OPPOSING AR 3053 WMCH WOULD BAR THE CITY FROM GENERATING NEW DEVELO REVENUES. THE CRIY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF UIA DOES RESOLVE, DEI AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, AB 3053 limits the ability of local governments to generate new development revenue. WHEREAS, AIR 3053 amounts to another unfunded state mandate. @ERF,AS, AR 3053 also erodes revenue generation and taxing authority of local governments and will make cities more dependent on the state budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 1:The City Council opposes AlR 3053. Section 2.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of _, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF I]DE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO Y CERTIFY that Resolution No. 96-- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula R-@IERDAaEPORT,S7AF'F33.NUS at a regular meeting thereof held on the -th of , 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNC F.RS: NOES: COLTNC ERS: ABSENT: COUNC ERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R-\LANIERDA\REPORTWAFF33.MIS ITEM 23 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE&-- CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Invitation from the City of Voorburg RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to attend ceremonies in Voorburg on behalf of the City of Temecula. STAFF REPORT: The City has received an invitation from the City of Voorburg inviting our Mayor to attend ceremonies commemorating Mayor Bas Eenhoorn's service to Voorburg as he leaves government to return to the private sector on May 30th. The visit will serve as a confirmation of our continuing commitment to our Sister City relationship with Voorburg and introduce Temecula to Voorburg's new Chief Executive. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of this trip is estimated to be $1 600 for airfare, ground transportation, and some meals. The Mayor's lodging and many of his meals will be provided by members of Voorburg's Sister City organization. This expenditure will be charged to Account #001-100-999-5280. ITEIN4 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRE TOR OF FIV CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Emergency Purchase of Two File Servers PREPARED BY: Tom Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION:That City Council approve emergency purchase of two (2) file servers. BACKGROUND: The City utilizes personal computers at each employee's workstation, that are networked through a Novell file server which allows sharing of files and information. Recently, the City experienced a file server failure resulting in some computer down time and loss of productivity. This was attributed to the fact that one of the City's servers failed. In order to replace the failed file server and ensure the availability of emergency backup, the City Manager authorized an emergency purchase of two (2) file servers under, Section 3.12.290 (C)of the Temecula Municipal Code. This section requires the City Council review and approve theemergency purchase at the next City Council meeting. Theemergency purchase consisted of two file servers; one to replace the expired City Hall server (in service since 1992), and another one to replace the aging CRC file server (purchased in 1 99 1). Both servers have met or exceeded their useful life expectancy. The emergency purchase of the CRC file server was authorized to provide for future emergency back up purposes and was scheduled to be replaced in the beginning of the 1996-97 Fiscal Year. However, to ensure that an emergency back up is in place, the purchase was authorized, by the City Manager, ahead of schedule. In December, 1995, formal bids were received for a new file server, as required by the City's Imaging/Records Management Program. The vendor (awarded the file server bid) was able to provide us with two (2) new servers at a competitive price. The purchase of the file servers, from this vendor, also assured no conflict exists with present warranties and service contracts. The total price of this emergency purchase was $53,937.31. The vendor, lnacom Information Services of San Diego, has a solid working relationship with the City and also provides network engineering and support services. R:@A@R@AFF35.MIS 5181% FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of this equipment was funded by the Information Systems Internal Service Fund balance. R:@A@RnWAFF35.MIS 5nl% ITEIN4 25 ORDINANCE NO. 96-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA AMEENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.030 OF THE TEMIECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTANNG TO TERM LEMTS FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FindinLs. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That there is a need to amend Section 2.40.030 setting term limits for City Commissioners. B. Several current Commissioners will be forced to resign unless this ordinance is amended. C. The resignation of these Commissioners would result in the City losing a wealth of knowledge and history regarding various City projects and could potentially impact the quality of review that projects currently receive at the commission level. Section 2. Section 2.040.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read: 'Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, or by ordinance or resolution of the city council, all members of commissions of the city shall, at all times during their incumbencies, be bona fide residents and registered voters of the city. No member of any commission shall be a city employee, nor shall any person be a member of more than one commission at any one time'. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Ords\96-08 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A=T: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CrrY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 96-08 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of Apr-,!, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Ordii\%-N 2 I ITEI\4 26 ORDINANCE NO. 96-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ING SECTION NO. 2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTA@G TO MONTHLY CONWENSATION FOR CITY CO SIONERS. THE FOLLOWING COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findin2s. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the following: A. That the City Council wishes to amend Section 2.40. 100 to provide monthly compensation for City Commissioners. B.Monthly compensation for Commissioners includes: Planning Commission Public Safety/Traffic Commission Community Services/Parks Commission $ 1 00 per month $50 per month, and $50 per month Section 2. Section 2.040. 100 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read:'City Commissioners shall receive monthly compensation as follows: Planning Commission Public Safety/Traffic Commission Community Services/Parks Commission $ 1 00 per month $50 per month, and $50 per month.' Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect @y (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Ords\96-09 1 PASSED, APPROVF-D AND ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor AT=T: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 96-09 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of April, 1996 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and T)@ @,sed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Ordm\96-09 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEI\4 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 9:50 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberts presiding. ROLI (-AL-L- PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Directors Birdsall and Stone stated they would abstain on Item No. 1. It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Ford to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4. The motion was unanimously carried. 1 Minutes 1.1Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAIN: 2 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Stone 2Release of B-Q n dfor Tract 25004-1. Barclay Estates 2.1Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the construction of the TCSD slopes and landscaped area within Tract No. 25004-1, Barclay Estates. r:\mi nutes. c sd\042 3 9 6 -1- 3Release of Bond for Nicolas Road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc. 3.1Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials bond for the construction of Nicolas road Park - Coscan Homes California, Inc. 4.Award of Contract for Construction of sgorts Park Creek Restoration (Proiect No. PW95-10CM 4.1Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the sports Park Creek Restoration Project PWC-@'@ 10 CSD. 4.2ANard a construction contract in the amount of $195,059.00 to R.K. Allen Landscape Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract. 4.3Authorize the general Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $19,505.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Stc -@e, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:50 P.M. to a meeting on May 14, 1996 00 P.M., Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. -ne motion was unanimously carried. Ron Roberts, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ District Secretary r:\minutes.csd\042396 -2- ITEI\4 2 APPRO CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fi@41QF CITY MANAGER)%@ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:Board of Directors FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Release of Bonds for Nicolas Road Landscaping - Coscan Homes California, Inc. (Nicolas Road near North General Kearny Road) PREPARED BY:Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors: Authorize the City Clerkto release the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond for the construction of NicolasRoad Landscaping - Coscan Homes California, Inc. BACKGROUND:On August 23, 1 994, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: Coscan Homes California, Inc. 1 2865 Pt. Del Mar, #200 Del Mar, CA 92014 for the construction of parkway landscaping adjacent to Tract No. 27827 and Nicolas Road Park. Accompanying the parkland agreement were surety bonds issued by The Reliance Insurance Company, as follows: 1 . Faithful Performance Bond No. B248231 6/111073in the amount of $30,1 33.50. 2.Labor and Materials Bond No. B248231 6/111073,in the amount of $1 5,066.75. 3. Parkland Warranty Bond No. B248231 5/111074,in the amount of $3,013.35. On October 1 0, 1 995, the Board of Directors accepted the grant deed for Nicolas Road Park and the parkway landscape improvements. All areas were constructed per the approved plans and inspected and approved by the City's Maintenance Superintendent. Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration' of the faithful performance bond and the labor and materials bond for the parkway improvements. The warranty bond, in the amount of ten percent of the Faithful Performance Bond, shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. r:\yasinobk\nicolas.t>dr 051496 No fiscal impact from the release of the faithful performance FISCAL IMPACT: bond and the labor and materials bond. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Vicinity Map 2.Surety Bonds r:\yasinobk\nicolas.bdr 051496 ton -14 > -< r- cn > z G') cn BOND NO. B2482316/111073 Premium: $565-00 CITY OF CULA PARKLAND/LANDSCAPE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND ikS, the City of Temecula, State of Caffomia, and COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES (hereinafte,- designated as "Principal") have entered into an @d Improvements, whic@ said wherebv Principal acre--s to insuh and complete cer= par 19 RORIPAUGH - TRACT Ac,re--ment, dated and identified as project 2 7 8 2 7 -1 hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and is ,kS, Principal is requ@ under the terms of the Agreement to furnish a bond for the Fait@l Performance of the Agreement; F,ELIANCE INSURANCE NOW, ORE, we the Principal and COMPANY as surety , are held and fumly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, in the penal sum of S 30,133-50---, lawful monev of the United States, for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severaev. The condition of this obliaation is such that the obligation sha.11 become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, sha-U in all thin-s stand to, abide by, well and truly keep,, and perform the covenaL-.--@, conditions, and provisions in the Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on Es or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the m:;rier therein specified, and in a.U r@ects according, to his or their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save h@ess the Cirv of Temecula, its officers, agents, and employees, as therein stipulated; other-wise, this oblieation shall be and remain in full force and effect. and in addition to the face arnount specified As a paxt of the obLi-,,ation secured hereby s and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable therefor, there sha.Ll be included cost ttorney's fees, incurred by CiEy in successfully enfor@g such obligation, all to be taxed as a costs and included in anv 'ud,,eme-it @endered. The suretv hereby stimulates and agrees that no chan-e, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Acrre--ment or to the work to be performed thereunder or the -me shall in an,vwav affect its obligations on this bond, and specifications accompanvinc, the sa @ m it does herebv waive notice of an,; such chan-e, extension of time, alteration or addition to the ter-rns of the Azreement or the work or to the specification-,. 2 by the Princ' al and D; WITIN-ESS OF, this ins@ment has been duly execut@ Surety above named, on AUGUST 7 19 94 (Seal) (S@) S U-RE@-- PRINCI:PAL RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES KATSUKO TAKATA e) (Narne) Senior Vice President ATTORNEY-IN-FACT (Title) (Title) By: Director of (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ER THORSON City Attorney 3 ST-KTF- OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN FRANCISCC ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY On AUGUST 10, 1994 before me, T. A. FERMANICH, NOTARY PUBLIC , personally ap@red KATSTI-KO TAKATA, A'TORNEY-IN-FACT FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY personalty known to i ose name(s)- isiare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hisiher/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisiheritheir signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNF-SS my hand and official seal. T.A. ;:@E R W,@A N l@r, H,@ "01',Aki. #10'0340 ;P Signature Seal) @@o FARY PUBLIC-C. hL:FORr4lA Cciinri of S,-.i Franc!s,,:o 17.1997 State of California ss. County c@ On before me, LNtJt4 -s IL. @@C-tA@ NoLarv Public, pers4 ed @lie eiefy e," efl@ to be ttle person(s) whose personally known to Mc @491-2 @- /they executed the lialiic(s) @arc subscribedinstrument and acknowicd,,cd to ine that lm /tile'r s'gnature(s) on the 'nstrut-neiit the saiiie in /their authorized capacity(ics), and that by I)crsoii(s), or the entity upon behalf' of which the persoil(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS m, Brand and off-icial seal. LYNN C. MORGAN Convm t 998758 S'icyiiature (Seal) FD-1 (12/90) Bond No. B2482316/111073 Premium:Included in Performance CITY OF CTJLA Bond /LAiNDSCA.P@ LABOR AND MA BOND P. S, the City of Temecula, State of CaYornia, and COSCAN DAVID SON HOMES er designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement wherelv (here@ Pr'mcipal agr@ to install and complete c--@ Parkland improvements, which sa-id AEre--ment, 2 19@A and 'dentifi@ as Project RORIPAUGH TRACT 27817-1, dated is herebvreferred to and made a part hereof; and ,%S, under the terms of said A-reement, Principal is required before enter,@,z upon the perfortnanct of the work, to file a aood and sufficient payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencin- with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division ') of the Civil Code of the State of California; and RELIANCE INSURANCE NOW ORE, we the principal and COMPAM as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and a-U contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of $1 066.7@ lawful money of the United States, for materials famished or labor thereon of anv kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exc@g the amount set forth. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shau be included costs and reasonable e@nses and fees, including @onable attomey's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as I dcrement rendered. costs and included in any Ju y stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of It is herebv expressl any and all per-sons, compa:--,-s and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a rieht (commencinc, with @-ection 3082) of Part of action to them or their assigns in any suit brou-ht upon tIL, 7- bond. If the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obliaatio,,- sha-U become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and -ernain in full force and effect. The surery he- by stipulates and ac-Tees that no chan2e, extension of time, alteration or e additic.-. to the terms of the Agreement or to the wc-'@'- to be performed thereunder or the specifications accornpanyin- the same shall in anyway affect its oblizations on this bond, and it does herebv waive notice of any such chan-es, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN s OF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on AUGUST 10 19 94. 2 (Seal) (se3i) SL@TY RELIANCE INSURANCE COM-PANY p@c SCAN DAV@S'ON HOMES Y@ KATSUKO TAKATA Stephen P. Dovle (N@) (N@) ATTOR.NEY-IN-FACT Senior Vice President CNTLE) By: E. Dale Gleed Director of Engineering APPROVED AS TO FORM: RSON City Attorney 3 STATF- OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN FRANC I SCO ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY On AUGUST 10, 1994 before me, T. A - FERMANICH, NOTARY PBBLIC , personally appeared KATSUKO TA @TA, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY personally known to mi 0 I- on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is)ar-e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heishe/they executed the same in hisiheritheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisiheritheir signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNF,SS my hand and official seat. Signature I (Seal) T.A. FERNIANICH %@IOMM. #1010840 PICTARY PUBLIC-CAL:FOR MA C. C!tY & COUTIRY Of Sm Fra,-.c:sro kt@ CO.TM. Exwes Llec. 17, 1947 State of California Ss. )unty of On -ST I (A before me, LN @D V-@ No ry Public, personally appeared -S-TEI -ON@F- personally known to i-nc (@+ @iiie ) to be the person(s) whose naiilc(s)@/arc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to i-ne t at /they executed the sai,ne iii /their allL]Iorized capacity(les), and that by /their sigilature(s) on tile Instrument tile persoii(s), or tile entity upon behalf of which the pcrson(s) acted, executed the ilistrul-ncnt. WITNESS i-ny hand and official seal. LYNN C. M PMUC Si -nature (Sea]) San Diego cmm Lwe, FD-1 (12/90) Y'@'vLl@NCE INSURANCE COMT@ HEAD OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Sta, of Pennsylvania, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Katsuko Takata, individually, of San Francisco. California, its true and lawful Atiorney(s)-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, and as its act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and to bind the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory ir. the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the RELIANCE INSURANCE CON'PANY and sealed and attested by one other of such officers, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said ArTorney(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power o@ -ttorney is granted under and by authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY which became eff ective September 7, 1 9 7 8, which provisions are now in f ull f orce and ef f ect, reading as f ollows: ARTICLE Vil - EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKING 1 .The Board of Directors, the President, the Chairman of the Board, any Senior Vice President. any Vice Presider. or Assistant Vice Presidentor other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to (a) appoint Attorneyls)-in-Fact and to authorizethem to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and under-takings, recognizances, contracts of indemnitv and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and lbl to remove any such Attornevis)-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power and authority given TO them. 2. Attorney(s)-in-Fact shall have power and authority, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued to them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. 3. Attorneyls)-in-Fact shall have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity or other conditional or obligatory under-takings and they shall also have power and authority to certify the financial statement of the Company and to copies of tne By-Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 5th day of June, 1 979, at which a quorum was present, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: 'Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or any certificates relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such Power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, this 13 day of October, 1993 RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF King ISS. On this 1 3 day of October, 1 993 personally appeare to me known to be the Vice President of the RELIANCE INSUR, foregoing instrument and affixed the seal of said corp Comoany,and the Resolution, set forth therein, are still in 1, Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of the RELIANCE IN! correct copy of a Power of Attorney executed by said REL IN WITNESS WHERECF, I have hereunto set my hand and ent ence W. Caristrom nd acknowledged that he executed and attested the rticle Vil, Section 1, 2, and 3 of the By-Laws of said lic in and for State of Washington Residing at Sumner ereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and NY, which is still in full force and effect. ompany this 10TH day of AUGUST 19 94. Assistant Secretary BDR-1431 Ed 3/93 ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE ERAL MAI CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Award of Contract for Construction of North/South Restroom Facility (Project No. PW96-07CSD) PREPARED BY:hawn Nelson, Director of Community Services on Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects cott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1 .Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the North/South Restroom Facility, Project PW96-07CSD. 2.Award a construction contract in the amount of $26,572.00 to Mahr Construction, and authorize the President to execute the contract. 3.Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $2,657.20 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 4.Transfer $29,229.20 from Pala Community Park Project, account number 210-190-120- 5804 to the Rancho California Sports Restroom Renovation Project account number 210-190-146-5804. BACKGROUND: The project plans and specifications have been completed and the project bid opening was conducted on April 3, 1996. This project will be rehabilitating the existing restroom facility at the North/South ball fields in the Rancho California Sports Park, which includes modifying both the men and women restrooms to conform with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements and adding a A.C. handicap parking space just north of the existing building. -I- r:\agdrpt\96\05 14\pw96-07.awd Three (3) bids for the project were publicly opened on April 3, 1996 and the results shown below: 1. Mahr Construction $26,572.00 2. Turning Point Construction, Inc $38,695.00 3. E. A. Mendoza $49,400.00 Staff has contacted the State Contractors License Board and confirmed that the license is current and in good standing. Mahr Construction in currently constructing the improvements at Sam Hicks Park. A total of 20 working days have been allowed for construction which is scheduled to begin in June of 1996 and be completed by July 1, 1996. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project will be funded with Development Impact Fees remaining after the completion of Pala Community Park. The total project cost of $29,'. .20 includes the contract amount of $26,572.00 plus the 10% contingency of $2,657.20. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Construction Contract r:\agdrpt\96\0514\pvi96-07.awd ATTACHMENT 1 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT -3- r:\agdrpt\96\0514\pw96-07.awd CITY OF TEMECULA AGRE NORTH/SOUTH RESTROOM FACI]LrrY PROJECT NO. PW96-07CSD THIS AGREEMENT, made this @ day of BW, 1996, by and between the City of Temecula a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California ("City"), and @ Construction hereinafter called "Contractor". In consideration of their mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinafter set forth, hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required for the construction of the improvements described in Work Order attached hereto. The work shall be performed according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Bidding For Public Works Street Maintenance Work Orders of $25,000 or lzss, Fisc2l Year 1995-96. ("Informal Bidding Procedures"). Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the work in general terms, but not n complete detail, the latest version of the C@ of Temecula. Department of Public WorKs Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction ("Standard Drawings"), and Standard S@fications for Public "' ' - @ction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 In case of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal Bidding Procedures, the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. 2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, ac,,rees to pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in ftiu satisfaction for the work done hereunder the sum of Twenty-six thousand rive biindred and e-eventy-two dollars and Zero cents ($26-572,01, in accordance with the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the Contractor within the time and in the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final payment to be made within thirty-five (35) days after @g Notice of Completion of said work and improvement with the Riverside County Recorder. 3.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the iabor code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prev@g rate of per them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or @ of workman I pwO4/r:\cip\projects\pw96-07\infinlbid.ada 042396 needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Indus@ Relations. These rates are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office in Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.15, 1777.6, and 1813 of the labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 4.Contractor, by executing the Contract, hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I win comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract." 5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. 6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City business license. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove written. 2 pwG4/r:\cip\projects\pw96-07\infmlbid.ada 042396 CITY OF TEMECLTLA CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCTION 425 West Ride, Unit A3 Perris, California 92571 By: By: Ron Roberts, President Signature Title: ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk (Date) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 3 pw(14/r:\cip\pmjecta\pw96-07\infffilbid.ada 042396 PROJECT NO. PW96-07CSD CITY OF TEMECULA CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE This is to certify that , (hereinafter the "undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in fun for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any of the undersigned's agents, employees, or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction or repair of that certain work of improvement known as: situated in the Community of City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owning to the undersigned. Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to the work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above referenced construction project. Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of and waives the benefits of 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known to him must have materially effected his settlement with the debtor. " This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction or the above referenced project or the contract between the City and the Contractor with respect thereto whether such claims are now known or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected. Dated: By: (Name) (Title) 4 pwO4/r:\cip\projecta\pw96-07\infinlbid.ada 042396 It ITEI\4 4 AP CITY ATTORNE' FINANCE OFFIC IT MANAGEF CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:Board of Directors FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Design Services Contract - Americans with Disabilities Act Park improvement Project PREPARED BY:Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors award contract of $10,450 to The Alhambra Group for the preparation of the schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Park Improvement Project. BACKGROUND: On February 28, 1 996, the City solicited Proposals from qualified landscape architectural firms for design services for the ADA Improvement Project. The project will retrofit four City parks to meet ADA standards and make the play and recreational experiences accessible to people with disabilities. It is envisioned that the ultimate improvements will include: Veteran's Park: Sidewalk access to two tot lots; all-access play surfaces for two tot lots; park benches Calle Aragon Park: All-access play surface for tot lot; all-access drinking fountain John Magee Park: Play structure installation; all-access play surface for tot lot; park benches; sidewalk access to picnic facilities Rancho California Sports Park: Sidewalk to tot lot; sidewalk, ramps, and striping from parking lot to Rancho Vista ball fields; ramp access to ball fields No. 1 and 2 The City received five responses to the Request for Proposals. They were reviewed and ranked by a review committee of three staff members. The Alhambra Group has successfully completed or is in the design/construction process on several City park facilities. The Alhambra Group is a local firm and presented a competitive proposal, therefore, the selection committee recommends the award of the design contract to this firm. Staff has negotiated with The Alhambra Group for a final scope of work and a cost proposal of $10,450 for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of this Design Services Contract is $10,450. This project is budgeted and approved in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1995-96. The City has obtained Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding approval in the amount of $1 61,500 to complete this project. r.\c @pm CITY OF TEMIECULA AGRE FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGRIEEMENT, is made and effective as of May 14, 1926, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and The Alhambra Group ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on May 14, 1996 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than May 14, 1997, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit B. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4.PAYWNT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Ten Thousand Four Hundred Fifty Dollars and No/100 ( 450 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the r:ruacp\a@rv.ctr -1- Reviwd 9118/95 Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5.SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGRE WRMOTJT CAUSE. a.The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminatethis Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6.DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to COMDiy with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event th@t Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in theperformance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultantwith written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its de,.Iault within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of tnis Agreement, to r.rusep\jk@rv.ctr -2- Revised 9/l8t95 terminate this Agreement without @er notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. ME CATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9.INSLTRANCE REOUIRE S. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. r:rusep\adaimprv.ctr -3- Revised 9/18/95 a.Minimum Scol& of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1)Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2)Insurance Services Offir-e form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3)W 2r's Compensation insumice as required by the State of Cc-_ mia and Employer's Liability Insurance. (4)@--rrors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant's profession. b.Minimum Limits of Insurance. Cor-..@l..Itant shall maintain limits no less than: (1)General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, pe-sonal injury and property damage. if Commercial Generai L..aoility Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or tiie general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2)Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3)Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4)Errors and omissions liability: $250,000 per occurrence. C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d.Other Insurance Provi The general liability and automobile liabilit@!, policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1)The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as rzspects: liability arising out of r.ruwp A@ry.ctr -4- Rcvised 9/lgt95 activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2)For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3)Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4)The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5)Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e.AccgDtability of InsurerS. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best'srating of no less than A:Vll, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f.Verification of Coverap-e. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. AR endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. r:rusep\adaimprv.ctr -5- Reviwd 9/18/95 10.MEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, exr-ept as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBIL The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12.RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. AR information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the Citv Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support. -estimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify Citv should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any su.-,imons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present r.rusep@rv.ctr -6- Reviw4 9/19/95 at - any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention:City Manager To Consultant:The Alhambra Group 28841 Rancho California Road, Suite G Temecula, CA 92590 Attention:Vince DiDonato 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Vince DiDonato shall perform the services described in this Agreement. The Alhambra Group may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Vince DiDonato from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. r:ruscp\adaimprv.ctr -7- Rcvised 9/19/95 16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the 11--.ws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties tc this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, supe @ -or, or federal district cou@-t with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 1'. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding b@ -. ween the parties relating to the obligations of the parties descdr - -- ' ;.n this Agreement. AL -.@-ior or conterrr)oraneous agreements. Understandings, represent:-- ' @ns and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agree!7-,--nt and shall be or no furner force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth here - , and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AL7ffnRM TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN S WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT Crff OF TEM[ECUIA By By Vince DiDonato, Owner Karel Lindemans, Mayor Attest: June S. Greek, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Atte:@ey prv.ctr -8- Rev@ 9/19195 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT APPROACH The following information summarizes the proposed methodology to be undertaken to enable timely accomplishment of project objectives. Initially, and concurrent with consultant selection and prior to consultant authorization to proceed, levels of authority, frequency of meetings, time schedules, etc., should be resolved. Secondly, it is essential that specific City and consultant project managers be assigned to provide "single point contact" for the day-to-day coordination of the project. This enables continuity of communication and aids materially towards project efficiency and effectiveness. It is also important that the designated project managers participate in the formulation of the consultant agreement to ensure a thorough understanding of respective roles, levels of authority, intent of parties, time of performance, etc. Upon notice to proceed, a project initiation conference is suggested during which City-furnished data can be presented; introductions of respective staff accomplished; scheduling of project phases; and areas of special interest discussed. With respect to the proposed method of approach, it is envisioned that the project will consist of: Research and Analysis 2.Schematic Concept Plan 3.Construction Drawings and Specifications 4.Construction Implementation Administration 1.Research and Analysis a.Research and Measurement 1.Assemble, review and analyze available reports, data, studies, etc. 2.Develop specific task assignments b.Analysis Phase 1.Undertake site analysis activity. 2.Compile data collected and establish criteria. 2.Schematic Concept Plan a.Preparation Of schematic development plans. b.Initiate engineering analysis. C.Initiate development phase schedules and cost studies. d.Presentation and review of schematic plans. 3.Construction Drawings and Specifications a.Title Sheet b.Existing Utility Plan C.Grading/D----inage Plan d.Construct--jn/Staking Plan e.Construction Details f.Plantin- Plan (retrofit) g.Irrigat@on Plan (retrofit) h.Planting and Irrigation Details 1.Specifications 4.Construction Implementation Administration a.Project bidding assistance b.Construction observation C.Project administration d.Construction management EXHIBIT B ALHAMBRA GROUP Landscape Architecture lic. #2017 FEE COMPENSATION for THE ADA PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COMPENSATION FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE $10,450-00 (TEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS) AS DIVIDED BETWEEN THE FOLLOWING PHASES: Research, Analysis & Schematic Plan $ 3,000.00 construction Plans Specifications $ 4,500.00 intract Administration $ 2,100.00 SUBTOTAL $ 9,600.00 Reproduction Reimbursibles $ 850.00 TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $ 10,450.00 28441 Rancho California Road, Suite G, Temecula, CA. 92590 (909) 671;.0226 Fax 1909) 694-1587 ALEULMRA GROUP CURRENT BILLING SCHEDULE January 1, 1996 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Principal $95 Project Manager $80 Pro@ect Designer $60 Senior Draftsperson $50 Draftsperson $45 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Administrative Assistant $45 Word Processing Operator $40 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES AND EXPENSES Mileage 0.35/mile Subsistence Cost Outside Services Cost plus 10% Materials & Other Expenses Cost plus 20% EI\4 5 APPROV CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fir4 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:Board of Directors FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY 1 996-97 PREPARED BY: @Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO CSD 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides parks and recreation, median and slope maintenance, street and traffic signal lighting, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are contiguous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. The six current service levels of the TCSD include: 1 . Community Services, Parks, and Recreation. 2.Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights, Traffic Signals and Medians. 3.Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. 4.Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 5.Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping. 6.Service Level R - Streets and Roads. r: \ya-sinobk\9697 mte. csd 051496 The TCSD Is requirec -o complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution accepting the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the aforementioned services; noticing every property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 1996-97 and sc ledule a public hearing concerning these issues for June 11, 1996. Staff will then proceed with noticing every property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the June I 1 th public hearing. Flc.,'CAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 1 996-97 Rates and Charges will fund the parks and , -eation; median and slope maintenance; street lighting; recycling and refuse collection; aFi@ street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The proposed TCSD levy budget for FY 1996-97 is $5,529,077. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Resolution of Intention for FY 1 996-97 TCSD Rates and Charges. 2.Preliminary annual levy report for FY 1 996-97. r: \yasinobk\9697 rate. 051496 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 96-- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMIECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 AND SETTING A T@ AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, service and administration of street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and reftise collection, street and road improvements and (the "Services and/or Facilities") for those areas specifically benefitted thereby and charges by the county service areas or the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and WHEREAS, the Board has requested the preparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1996-97 containing the proposed rates and charges for filin- with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant t) to the Community Services District I-aw being Division 3 of title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); and NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA CO.@ TY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDERAS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, an Engineer's Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1996-97 (the "Report") had been presented and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD. The Report contains a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be provided and the proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities and a description of the parcels subject to the rates and charges. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary" and is incorporated herein by reference. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. The Report is hereby preliminarily approved and adopted and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Reference to the Report is hereby made for all particulars. r: \yas inobk@eso 1 996. @ SECTION 2. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and emption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. SEC ION 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEME-@-ULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON JUNE 11, 1996, AT 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS FEASIBLE IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOC@TED IN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER, 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the TCSD will review and consider any protests received in writing by the Secretary prior to the scheduled hearing. Public comment regarding the Report by all interested persons will be heard at the public hearing. SE TION 4. The Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing and the filing of the Report by Publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks and by first class mail to each person who owns a parcel which will be subject to such rates and charges as such names and addresses are shown in the last equalized roll or as known to the Secretary. r: \yminobk\r"o 1 996.csd SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of May, 1996. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERNTICES DISTRICT Ronald H. Roberts, President ATTEST: June Greek, Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] r: \yminobk\reso I 996.cad STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June Greek, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEP-EBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly a-lopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the day of 1 1996, by the following rofl call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT:DIRECTORS: June Gre.-.'-, Secretary/City Clerk r:\y@inobk\r"ol996.@ EXHMIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECL'LA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1, 1995, Muni Financial Services was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1996-97. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD has the power to levy and cohect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the assignment of zn benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of six (6) city-wide service levels. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: 1.Community Services, Parks and Recreation. Operations, maintenance, and administration of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services and programs. 2.Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of all arterial street li-hts, medians and traffic signals. 3.Service Level B - Residential Street Liizhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street lights. 4.Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapin2 and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscapin- and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. 5.Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sw=iniz, Operations and administration of the refuse and recycling pro-ram, and street sweepin- services for all single-family residential homes. 6.Service Level R - Street and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and roads. r: @ysinobk\r,-,o I 996.csd The- Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals for Fiscal Year 1996-97 to be as follows: SERVICE -F-VEL LEVY BUDGET $/SFR Community Services/Parks: $2,717,562.00 $ 69.24 Service Level A 204,092.00 5.20 Service Level B 252,948.00 25.62 S--rvice Level C 508,482.00 Variable Service Level D 1,826,717.00 162.78 Service Level R 19,276.00 Variable TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 96-97: $5,529,077.00 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1996-97 ;a@-@ as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk. r: \yas inobk\r@o 1996. csd CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD), FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 PRELIMINARY REPORT SUBMITTED:May 6,1996 APPROVED: MuniFinancial Corporate Office San Francisco Office 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 3727 Buchanan, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92590 San Francisco, CA 94123 Tel- (909) 699-3990 Tel- (415) 441-3550 Fax- (909) 699-3460 Fax- (415) 441-1401 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Description of the District and Services 2 C. Budget and Levy Summary 3 11. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 5 Ill. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT 8 A. Modifications of the District Structure 8 B. Annexations 8 C. District Budget Changes 9 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS 10 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 12 APPENDIX A LAND USE /EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 15 APPENDIX B 1996/97 COLLECTION ROLL 16 OVERVIEW A.Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all taxable parcels within the City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the rates and charges were set and established pursuant to Community Sel-vi'ces District Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Division 3 of the Califomia Govemment Code (the Code). The Engineer's Annual Levy Report describes the District, any new annexations, any changes to the District, and the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1996/97. The rates and charges are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that provide a direct and special benefit to properties within the District. The improvements and services within the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the services provided to that parcel by the District. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for special district benefits. A Public Hearing is held each year before the District Board of Directors (Board), to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Final Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Rates and Charges (Charges), the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1996/97. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1996/97. 1 B.Description of the District and Services The District provides certain services, and the maintenance of specific improvements within public right-ol ways and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six (6) separate Service Levels, providin-.- specific services and benefit to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service IL-@-vel, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within that Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The Service Levels are identified as follows-. * Community Service, Parks and Recreation 0Arterial Street Lighting and Medians 0Residential Street Lighting 0Local Landscaping and Slopes 0Citywide Recycling and Refuse 0 Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided t@rough the District include-. the construction and maintenance cl@ community parks-, recreation programs-, street lighting-, median landscape maintenance; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection- a recycling and refuse collection prograr- and road improvement construction and maintenance. 2 C.Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services, that benefit various parcels within the community and each Service Level is comprised of specific parcels of differing types. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table 1), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in thal- Service Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level A, levy units are calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The "-I otal Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment and Appendix A. Table I on the following page, provides general levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1996/97 to the previous Fiscal Year. 3 TABLE I !7)ERVICE LEVELS PRIOR FISCAL YEAR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 Net Charge Charge Change Total Total Levy Per Levy Total Levy Per Levy Per Levy Total Levy Parcels SERVICE LEVEL Budget Unit Btidget Unit Ull,! Units Charged Coniniuiiity Services, Paiks, and Recreation $2,611,856 $68.88 $2,717,562 $69.24 $0.36 39,248.45 15,342 Service Level A Arterial Street Lighting and M(,,Ii,iiis 157,586 4.16 204,092 5.20 1.04 39,248.45 15,342 Service Level B Residential Street Lighting 14,170 26.92 252,948 25.68 (1.24) 9,850.00 9,850 Service Level C Local Landscaping and Slopes Rate Level # 1 (C-1) 53,543 46.00 57,270 46.00 0.00 1,245.00 1,245 Rate Level # 2 (C-2) 88,200 89.00 94,340 89.00 0.00 1,060.00 1,060 Rate Level # 3 (C-3) 134,696 116.00 144,072 116.00 0.00 1,242.00 1,242 Rate Level # 4 (C-4) 198,951 175.00 212,800 175.00 0.00 1.2 !" no 1,216 Service Level D Citywide Recycling and Refuse 1,808,867 172.06 1,826,717 162.78 (9.28) 11,222.00 11,222 Service Level R Roads Rate Level # I (R-1) 14,765 157.08 14,765 157.08 0@00 94.00 120 Rate t.evel # 2 (R-2) 1 $4,633 1 1 .92 @4,511 1 121.92 1 $0.00 1 37.00 57 Note:Due to rounding, the Total Levy Units (shown in this table) multiplied by the Charge Per Unit may I.(, different front 11; , Total Levy Budget. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Community Services, Parks, and Recreation provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a condition of their residential pro'ects, or through development impact fees. This Service Level also allowed for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. This Service Level also provides funding for the various recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the City's parks and recreation facilities: 0 Rancho California Sports Park 4 Paloma Del Sol Park a Sam Hicks Monument Park a Loma Linda Park a Veterans Park a Riverton Park 0 Bahia Vista Park a John Magee Park 0 Temecula Middle School Fields a Pala Community Park 0 Old Town Temecula Senior Center - Voorburg Park 0 Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park 0 Nakayama Park 0 Temecula Elementary School Pool - Nicolas Road Park 0 Butterfield Stage Park 0 Calle Aragon Park 0 Temecula Roller Hockey Park 0 Temecula Duck Pond 0 Temecula Skate Park a Rotary Park 0Temecula Community Recreation Center 0 Temecula Community Center Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. 5 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and s,,-pes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. Table 11 shows a listing of the tracts in each of the four (4) rate evels within Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE 11 Service Level C Tracts Rate Level C-1 Rate Level C-2 Rate Level C-3 Rate Level C-4 Tract Name Tract al Tract Name Tract Tract Name Tract 41 F Tract Name PRESLEY OEVELOPMENT 23257-00 MORRISON HOMES 22148-00 MAR-RNIQUE 23128-00 BARCLEY ESTATES 25004-01 23267-01 RIDG.-VIEW 20735-07 SADCLEWC)OD 1851 B-CO MF-40OWVIEW 21 765-00 23257-02 20735-08 18518-01 SIGNE-, S@RES 20882-00 23257-03 20735-09 18518-02 20882-01 232z-7-04 20881-,OD 18518-03 20882-0 26861-01 21764-00 VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 20882-03 26861-02 WNCHESTER CREEK 20130-00 2271 5-01 7@Z-AINDS 231 25-00 RA,'4CHO HIGHLANOS 20643-00 20130-01 22715-02 23125-01 20644-00 =1 20130-02 23125-02 21760-00 20130-03 22716-01 '@ILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 22203-00 20130-04 22716-02 21672-02 22204-00 20130-05 22716-03 21672-03 -00 20130-06 '2716-04 -04 22762 21672 PANCHO SOLA.IJA 22593-CO 21340-00 22915-00 21673-00 22593-01 21340-01 22915-01 21673-O, 22593-02 21340-02 22915-C2 21 573-02 -HE @INEYARCS 20679-00 21340-03 22915-03 21673-03 20879-01 21340-04 22916-CO 21674-00 21340-05 2291 B-C 1 21674-01 21340-06 2291 6-C2 21674-02 21340-07 2291 5-t,)3 21674-03 'NOOCCREST COUNTRY 21561-00 21675-00 22208-00 21575-01. 2167 5-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-C-- 21675-06 6 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to, renovation or restoration due to damage" flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading-, and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added to the District in Fiscal Year 1993/94. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread among all benefiting parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair shareof the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received.Service Level R currently has two (2)rate levels. The level of maintenancerequired within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 The parcels within this rate level consists of one hundred twenty (120) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane-, Liefer Road" Gatlin Road-, Pala Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road-, Calle Chapos-I Walcott Road-, and Tommy Lane. A total of 3.196 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-seven (57) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of-. Ormsby Road-, Santiago Road-, Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 7 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1996/97, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A.Modifications of the District Structure Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to- changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; annexation of parcels into the District or Service Levels-, or revisions in the method of apportionment. Other than the annexations described in the following section, no other modifications to the District are anticioated for the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. B.Annexations Annexations to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), are 799 parcels within Tracts: 11087-02 19939-00 21082-00 22916-00 23125-02 27827-01 18518-00 20703-01 21675-00 22916-02 24132-00 27827-02 19872-02 21067-00 22761-00 23125-00 24132-01 27827-03 Annexations to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), are 222 parcels within the following tracts: ùRate level #1 -No New Tracts. 0Rate level #2 - No New Tracts. 0Rate level # 3 - Tract 18518-00 (Saddiewood-3 parcels); and Tract 22916-03 (Vintage Hills-76 parcels). 0Rate level # 4 - Tracts 23125-00, 23125-01, & 23125-02 (Tradewinds-143 parcels). 8 Annexations to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 715 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. No other annexations are planned to any of the other Service Levels or to the District for Fiscal Year 1996/97. C.District Budget Changes The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level budget has increased due to increased operations and maintenance costs, as well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community parks. Although the budget has increased significantly. the total levy units has also increased resulting in less than a one percent increase in the rate and charges. Operations and energy costs for Service Levels A (Arterial Street Lights) have increased significantly over the previous year. Although the total levy units has also increased for this service level, the proposed rate and charges for this service level will increase moderately. In Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), the budget has increased with the addition of new tracts, but the number of parcels added to the service level has allowed for a reduction in the rate and charges. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), rate and charges has decreased due to reduced costs for the service. IV.DISTRICT BUDGETS Table III on the next two (2) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year 1996/97. TABLE III 1996/97 DISTRICT BUDGE Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1997 Account Cornmunity L..i A L..[ 6 I L..l C I Level 0 Level R To BUDGET ITEM Somicas I la No. 190 191 192 193 194 1 195 PERSONNEL SERVICES Salanes and Wages 5100 814,785 2.695 6.923 95,693 1 44,775 96.4871 DeferT@ Commmsmion 5101 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PERS Re(troment 5102 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 State Unemoloyment 5103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Mea,care FICA 510,4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 Unemoioyment Tra,n,ng Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 oj 0 0 O,sactliry Insu@ 5110 0 0 0 0 0 0 VVORK 9 Com@ation 5112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health Insurers 5113 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ,-emocrary Holo 5118 1,000 0 - 0 0 0 1.000- Part-T-, no I Prqect) 5119 453,369 0 15,786 0 0 469,155 5121 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 4 5W Sut)total (Pefsc)nnel @ices) $1.273.@ 52,695 56,923 $111,479 5-44.775 50 $1 439,526 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Tel@ S@,ce (Ceilular) 5208 4,500 G 0 0 0 0 4,500 Reoa,r & Ma,nL - Faal,t,es 5212 137@000 0 a 48,595 0 0 185,595 Reoa,r & Ma,rtierance-Venicies 5214 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 Reoasr & Maint.@ice Equ,oment 5217 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 1,500 Ma,riena@ S@ool,es 5218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Otr,@ 3uocl,es 5220 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 IA coo Pn,,. @ 5222 000 0 0 0 0, 0 35 cw L@al D@melnwMacs 5224 5w 0. 0 0 0 0 g,)o [)ues am MemDwsnips 51-1 2. OC)O 01 0 0 01 0 <)0 Put)"Ca[@ons 5228 500 L) 0 0 0 0 500 Postage anci PacKag,ng 5230 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 10 xo P@ry Tax Aamin Fees 5-'31 2.5W 2,500 1500 &90 i.am 75 9,325 Rent - Fac:iiues 5234 1 aw 0 0 0 0 0. i, am Rart - @-au.Drnerl 5238 i2.OC)O 0 0 0 0 1 2 OC)O Ec:u@c-eN Lease 5239 4,300 0 0 a 0 0 4,300 ut'l.i.es 5240 307,198 9,500 0 103,575 0 0 420.@173 S,a,l tools,Ec.,Dmet 5242 6,000 0 0 0 0 6,OOC UnOo@s 5243 4,700 0 0 0 0 0 4,700 S,gns 5244 5,000 01 0 0 0 = 5,000 Legai SE",Ces 5246 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 ,5,COO --onsu,t,r,g Se".@s 5248 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 10000 Otnff OLas,ce SeN@@s 525C 66,500 0 0 0 0 0 66,500 5254 4.OC)O 0 0 0 1.@ 0 5,500 P,t),,c Notces 5256 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 6 Om Contwences 5258 7,700 0 0 0 0 0 7,700 P,oless,o,a@ Meet,rgs -4260 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 Statl Tra,n.,nqEcucat,or 5261 - 000 0 0 0 0 0 7@000 M,,eage 5262 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,000 F.el E.@nse-C;ty Veh,C:es 5263 a.ow 0 C) 0 0 0 8,000 Counc,l O,scret,ona@ 5267 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blueornts 5268 500 0 c 0 5C)o La, 1201) s 1 $656 298 -312 a 020 S3 300 S75 1 $861 193 1 1 0 TABLE III 1996/97 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1997 Acct C--un,ly I L..l A L..l B L..i C I L@el 0 @l R T.,W Di.@.t I 191 No. 190 192 193 194 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE R@@ation SuDol,es 5301 0 1 -14 -oc ,14 100 0 0 0 0 Waste Haui,rg 5315 0 0 0 0 i 826 717 0 1 626 Street Lignting 5319 0 165,000 266 BW 0 0 0 431,KC Instance 5330 67273 0 0 0 0 0 7 2-3 Vetiicies 5335 20@877 0 0 0 0 0 20 877 irfo,@ation System 48,610 0 3,115 11,1108 4795 0 67 -3 -- 3 S@rDort SeN,ces 5345 23,391 0 0 0 0 0 23 39, Fac,l,ties 43,094 0 0 0 0 0 43.OC,4 Assessment Engineenng 5370 24 OC)O 0 0 0 0 0 24 WO Refuna of Pnor Year Assessments 5375 10,000 0 0 0 0 City Acm,n Charges 5NQ 162@000 0 0 0 0 0 162.OOC S.L)torais,4-3r,O's) $613 345 $165 000 S2C9,915 Si I 08 $1 831,512 so 32 890,88C ODerat,ng Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0 0 Em@encey Road Ma,ntena :a 5402 0 0 0 0 0 1 19@2Cl 19,201 Lana aoe Ma,ntenance 5415 456,670 15,000 0 272,971, 0 0 747 f>42 Land ai>e Rehab,l,tation 5416 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 1 0. C)OC Subtotals @540(Ys) $.456,670 $28,000 so $272,972 $0 Slg.'Ol 577r..843 OU)er Ex@,tures 5900 0 0 0 0 0 0 O@t,ng Trarsfers CLA @1 501,600 0 0 0 0 0 501,600 SUBTOTAL (Other ExDerid@ures) $WI 600 $0 so $0 $0 50 @ 6w CAPITAL OUTLAY off,ce Fum,sr,,ngs 5601 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Office Eau,cment 5602 0 0 0 0 0 Ven@es 5608 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eq@,pme,t 5610 5 5W 0 0 0 0 0 5,600 C:P - Prole,=s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL tcao,tal Outlay) S5 6w $0 so $0 $0 w 55,600 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS $3,537167 $207695 S278,328 $553,579 1 $1.879587 5192.76 $6,475642 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CL@N-PNGENCY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 TOTAL DJS,-RICT COSTS 3,537,167 Z07 695 278,338 579 1 1,679,587 19,276 6475542 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3537167 $,'07695 S278.338 579 $1,579,587 519,276 $6475,642 REVENUES 07HER REVENUE SOURCES 722,066 3,603 15.5w 13,000 2' 310 0 81,479 FUNO BALANCE 97,539 0 9,990 32,097 25,560 0 165 c-se BALANCE TO LEVY 2,717,562 204,092 25Z948 508,482 1,826,717 19,276 5,529,077 TOTAL REVENUES 537 '.67 $207,695 S278 338 @,579 $1.879.5a7 519,276 $6475642 V.METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the land use and size of a property. For the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Service Level-, and Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians); each property is assigned an Eculvalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's I .@d use and degree of berefit. For Service Level B (Residential Street Lightiig)-l Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes)-, and Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse); t@ie rates and charges ar@- Calculated on a per parcel basis. In Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU) factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level; and Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians): Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting): Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse): Total Balance to Levy I Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU). which is similar to a per parce! charge, but makes a distinction between c@. ;eloped and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy I Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge 1 2 Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for various property types for each Service Level. TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type EDU XI per EDU = I Charge I Multiplier@ Single Family Residential 1.00 $69.24 9.24 Per Unit Multi Family Residential 0.75 69-24 51.93 Per Unit Agricultural 0.50 69.24 34.62 Per Acre ingle amily Vacant 2.00 69.24 138.48 Per Acre Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 69.24 276.96 Per Acre Non-Residential lmoroved 6.00 $69.24 $415.44 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A Parcel Charge Parcel F Property Type EDU XI per EDU = I Charge I Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 $5.20 $5.20 Per Unit Multi Family Residential 0.75 5.20 3.90 Per Unit Agricultural 0.50 5.20 2.60 Per Acre ingle amily Vacant 2.00 5.20 10.40 Per Acre Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 5.20 20.80 Per Acre Non-Residential Improved 6.00 $5.20 1 $31.20 1 Ace PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type Unit X per Parcel Charge Multiplier Single F:arrily Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Par Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Par 1 3 TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type Unit X per Parcel Charge Multiplier Sir-, @ Family Resi-@ --,ial Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 S46.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 P cel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type Unit X per Parcel Charge Multiplier Singie Family Residential 1.00 1 $162.78 $162.!?S Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Parcel Charge Parcel Property Type Unit X per Unit Charge Multiplier -7ingle Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $157.08 $157@08 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 157.08 78.54 Per Parcel Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 1 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel 14 Appendix A -- LAND USE /EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Equivalent Property Type Dwelling Units Multiplier_ Single Family Residential 1.00 Units Multi Family Residential 0.75 Units Single Family Vacant 2.00 Acres Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 Acres Non-Residential Improved 6.00 Acres 1 5 Appendix B -- 1996/97 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County -Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include gover.-i,-nent owned land, public utility owned property, and land principally encum-.ered with public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 16 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEI\4 I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD APRIL 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:51 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR. Agency Member Stone and Chairperson Birdsall abstained on Item No. 1. It was moved by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1 Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1 996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall Minutes.rda\042396 -1- AGENCY 2Great Temecula Tractor Race Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1Approve sponsorship of the 1 996 Great Temecula Tractor Race in the amount of $10,000. The motion was unanimously carried. EXECUTIVE DIRECTAP None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S EPORTS None given. RECESS The meeting was recessed at 9:52 PM to a Joint Meeting of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.Financinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western BY12ass Corridor Councilmember Stone announced he would abstain due to a conflict of interest and stepped down from the podium. Finance Director Genie Roberts introduced Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig who presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: Minutes.rda\042396 -2- 23.1That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.2That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS 23.3That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess to execute the Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the City and the Financing Authority at 10:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 1 0: 1 0 PM. 24.Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western B)toass Corridor - Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: Minutes.rda\042396 -3- 24.1That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone 25.Financinas for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western BY12ass Corridor Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendations as follows: 25.1That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS 25.2That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWNMESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Minutes.rda\042396 -4- 25.3That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)K, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 25.4That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 25.5That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING THE RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Minutes.rda\042396 -5- RECESS Chairperson Birdsall called a recess at 10:21 PM to open ballots. The meeting was reconvened at 10:40 PM. City Clerk June Greek announced the ballots had been canvassed and reported the following: There were 186 qualified votes, 186 were cast, 184 voted "yes" and 2 voted 11 11 no Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig explained that the two "no" votes would be included in the district but would only be taxed if within a year, property is conveyed to Buffman. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendation 25.6 as follows: 25.6that the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation 25.7 as follows: 25.7Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWNFWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Minutes.rda\042396 -6- The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meetings at 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Agency Secretary Minutes.rda\042396 -7- ITEI\4 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTOR FINANCE DIF CITY MANAC TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO:Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members FROM:Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Amendment to Lease Agreement with Donna L. Reeves Trust RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members approve as to form an amendment to the Lease Agreement with Donna L. Reeves Trust and authorize the Executive Director and Agency Attorney to execute the amendment. DISCUSSION: The Agency currently owns the auto dealer site located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue and leases it to Donna L. Reeves Trust for $6250/mo. for the purpose of storing automobiles. Representatives of Donna L. Reeves have requested a modification to the lease terms to allow them to sell used autos and for Enterprise Rent-A-Car to operate from the site. We obtained a real estate broker's appraisal of fair market rent based on the change in use and the monthly rent will be $8500/mo. Additionally, Donna L. Reeves will repair an existing sign, remove the fence in front of the store and upgrade the landscaping. The term of the amendment is 3 years. The purpose of the lease is to provide income to the RDA until a user is found for the long term development of the property. FISCAL IMPACT: The amendment will provide an additional $2250 per month in income to the RDA. Attachment:Amendment No. 4 to Lease Agreement jug" DRAFT:MARCH 20, 1996 ------------------ FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO LEASE AGREEMENT, dated as of March 26, 1996 is made and entered into by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public bodv corporate and politic ("Lessor"), and Donna L. Reeves Trust UTD 7-25-90 ("Lessee"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge as true and correct: a.On January 25, 1994 Lessor and Lessee duly entered into that certain Lease Agreement ("Lease" @ @'or the real property located generally at 27500 Jefferson Street ("Premises"); b.The Lease was amended by "Amendment No. I to Lease Agreement," dated as of January 12, 1994, and "Amendment No. 2 to Lease Agreement," dated as of January 20, 1994, ajthough each was approved by Lessor on January 25, 1994 following approval of the Lease, and Amendment No. 3 dated 1995; C.The Lease provides for the Premises to be used for off-site storage of automobiles and other inventory related to Lessee's automobile dealership operations located elsewhere in the City of Temecula; d.This Amendment No. 4 will enable the Lessee to expand the allowable uses on the PremiseN,- impr,)ve the facilities on the Site and will provide for an adjusted rent; e.Amendment No. 4 will assist in the elirm'nation of blight in the area of the Premises by maintaining productive use of the Premises for automobile related uses and will complete the assistance provided to the Lessee as set forth in the Lease as well as effectively manage and maintain the real property owned by the Lessor pending the Agency's determination of appropriate long term development of the Premises; and f.The new rent set forth in this First Amendment is not less than the fair market rent for such properties given the restrictions and covenants LA)LI:149819.1 -I- DRAFT: MARCH 20,1996 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY contained in this Amendment No. 4 to Lease Agreement and in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. 2.Section 2.1 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows- "2.1 Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in this Lease, the term shall be twelve months, commencing on January 26, 1996 and ending on January 25, 1999. The Lessor shall have the right to terminate this Lease, for any reason in its sole discretion, upon ninety (90) days prior written notice. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shall include any extension of the term of the Lease." 3.Section 3.1 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: "3.1 Amount: Payment. Lessee shall pay to Lessor as rent for the Premises monthly payments of eight thousand five hundred dollars and no cents ($8500.00). Rent shall be payable in advance, without any deduction or offset whatever, in lawful money of the United States, commencing on May 14, 1996, and continuing on the fifteenth day of each succeeding month. All rent and other amounts payable by Lessee to Lessor under this lease shall be paid to Lessor at its address set forth in Section 21 of this Lease or to such other persons or at such other places as Lessor may designate in writing." 4.Section 6.1 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows: "6.1 Permitted Use. Lessee shall use the Premises for the purposes of off-site storage of automobiles and other inventory related to Lessee's automobile dealership operations located in the City of Temecula, and for selling, renting, and/or leasing new and used automobiles, provided however, that the Lessee complies with the requirements of Section 10.4 hereof. Lessee shall not use the Premises for any other purposes without the express prior written consent of the Lessor." 5.Section 10.4 is hereby added to the Lease to read as follows: "10.4 Lessee to Add Certain Imi2rovements to Premises. On or before July 1, 1996, Lessee shall have completed, at its sole expense and responsibility, the construction and installation of the following improvements on the Premises: - 2 - DRAFT: IKIARCH 20,1996 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY a.Construct and install the improvements as shown on the Landscaping Plan, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though set forth in full; b.Removal of existing fencing on the Premises as depicted on the Landscaping Plan, Exhibit A; C.Remodel and refiirbish the showroom at the front of the Premises for use as a sales facility for permitted uses and as an office for a rent-a-car firm; and d.Remodel and refurbish office space on the premises of at least square feet for use as offices for a non-profit community group serving the City. 6.Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the other terms and provisions of the Lease, as amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 3 - DRAFT: MARCH 996 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 to Lease Agreement by their respective duly authorized officers, agents or representatives on the date first written above. LESSOR: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson General Counsel -4- DRAFTO MARCH 20. 1996 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY LESSEE: DONNA L. REEVES TRUST UTD 7-25-90 Donna L. Reeves @:149819.1 -5- DP,AFT, MARCH 20, 1996 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY EXHIBIT A LANDSCAPE PLAN @. @.9819.1 -6- ITEN4 3 APPRO CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Flgt l@ I <- CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO:Redevelopment Agency Members FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Purchase Agreement for 28535 and 28545 Pujol Street Prepared By: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "REVISED AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA" BACKGROUND: On April 9, the Agency adopted a resolution authorizing staff to enter into a purchase agreement to acquire the above mentioned properties. However, the property owner has expressed concern regarding item Number 10, "Hazardous Substances Removal By Seller", of the purchase agreement (See Attachment No. 2). The Seller feels that the liability for hazardous substances after the sell of the property is arduous and should be removed. A Phase I Environmental Analysis on both properties was conducted to determine the presence of hazardous waste or unacceptable soil conditions. The Phase I study determined there to be a low probability for the presence of hazardous soils. Based on the analysis, staff is recommending that the purchase agreement be revised to relieve the seller of the liability. FISCAL IMPACTS The revision to the purchase agreement will not impact on the previously identified funding for this property. Attachments: 1 . Resolution No. RDA 96- - Page 2. Agreement for Acquisition - Page R:\HOUSING\OT70PURC.CC2 516/96 cdr ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- R:\HOUSINC3\OT'rOPURC.CC2 5/6/96 cdr 2 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF T AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "REVISED AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and declare that: a. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for RedevelopmentProject No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 12, 1988 priorto the incorporation of the City and subsequently approved and transferred to the RedevelopmentAgency of the City of Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan"). b. The Agency has established a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33433 for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low and moderate income housing within the Project Area and the City. C. The Agency proposes to purchase the properties described in the attached "Agreement forAcquisition of Certain Real Properties Located at 28535 and 28545 Pujol Street in the City ofTemecula" ("Property") for the purposes of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low and moderate income housing within the Project Area and the City as the properties are zoned for multi-family residential housing and is located in an area already developed with multi-family housing. d. The acquisition of the Properties for low and moderate income housing purposes is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and with the Implementation Plan adopted bv the Agency. Additionally, acquisition of the Properties and the improvement and presentation of low and moderate income housing thereon will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project Area. e. The acquisition of the Properties and the units thereon is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code 15326. Moreover, the EIR approving the Plan addressed the impacts of housing development in the area of the Properties. R:\HOUSrNG\OTTOPURC.CC2 5/6/96 cdr 3 Section 2.The Board of Directors of the Redevelo ment Agency of the City p of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "Revision to Agreement for Acquisition of Certain Real Property located at 28535 and 28545 Pujol Street in the City of Temecula" and aut@.,)rizes the Chairperson to execute the Agreement in substantially the fon-n attacht- hereto as Exhibit A. Section 3.The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment A-ency of the City of Temecula on 199-. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson A=T: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\HOUSING\OTTOPURC.CC2 5/6/96 cdr 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss CITY OF TEMECULA 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the Citv of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. RDA 96- was duly and reELliarly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a re-ular meetin- thereof, held on March 26, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES:AGENCY M@ERS: NOES:AGENCY M@ERS: ABSENT:AGENCY M@ERS: ABSTAIN:AGENCY MFNMERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:\HOUSING\OTTOPLTRC.CC2 5/6/96 edr 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVISION TO AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION R:\HOUSING\O'rrOPURC.CC2 5/6/% cdr 6 REVISED AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 28535 AND 28545 PUJOL STREET IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of April 9, 1996, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"), and Elizabeth Otto, a widowed woman ("Seller"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 . AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE. For valuable consideration, Seller agrees to sell to Agency, and Agency agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and for the consideration set forth in this Agreement, all that certain real property which is legally described and depicted as set forth on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ('Property"). The Properties are located generally at 28535 and 28545 Pujol Street in the City of Temecula (APN 922-054-004and 005). 2. PURCHASE PRICE. The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of One Hundred Fifty Five Thousand Dollars ($155,000.00) ("Purchase Price"), payable in full at the close of escrow. 3. RELOCATION AGREEMENT. The Agency agrees to pay to the seller, outside of the escrow, $41,840.00 in relocation benefits for all households occupying the property. The amount shall be paid upon vacation of the property. The seller shall vacate the property within ninety (90) days of the close of escrow with the first 60 days being rent free. Rent will be established at fair market value for the period following 60 days of close of escrow. Occupancy of the property beyond 90 days will be subject to Agency approval. 4. CONVEYANCE OF TITLE. Seller agrees to convey by grant deed ("Grant Deed") to Agency marketable fee simple title to the Property free and clear of all recorded and unrecorded liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes, subject only to those exceptions approved in writing by Agency pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. 5. CONDITION OF TITLE; TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. Agency shall obtain, at its expense, concurrently with the recording of the Grant Deed to Agency, a standard form CLTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price, issued by a title Corn pany chosen by the Executive Director of the Agency ("Title Company'), showing the title to the Property vested in the Agency, a public body, corporate and politic, sub'ect only to the exceptions approved by Agency pursuant to the following procedure. a. Agency shall obtain a preliminary title report ("PTR") within 20 working days of the date of this Agreement along with the documents described in the PTR. b. Agency shall, within working days from receipt of the PTR, approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the PTR, within 20 working days of receiving the document, in its sole discretion, and shall specify the items which are disapproved or conditionally approved. C. If Agency shall disapprove or conditionally approve any item in the PTR, Seller shall, within twenty (20) working days of receipt of such disapproval or R:\HOUSING\O'rroPURC.CC2 5nl96 cdr 7 conditional approval, advise Agency in writing whether or not Seller shall cause to be eliminated any such disapproved item or items. d. If Seller elects not to eliminate --. @ch item or items, this Agreement may be canceled by either party upon written notice to the other. 6. CONDITIONS PRECEDENTTO CLOSE OF ESCROW. Agency's obligation to complete the purchase hereunder is conditional upon the following: a.Agency shall approve the Preliminary Title Report; b.Agency shall conduct a physical inspection of the Property, and approve of the physicalcondition of the Property; C. Agency shall conduct an environmental investigation of the Property, including but not limited to, determining whether hazardous materials and/or asbestos are present on the Property, and shall approve the condition of the Propertv pursuant to such investigation; d. Agency conducts the environmental investigation and approves the environmental report on the Property described in Paragraph 8 of this Agreement; e. Agency approves the Seller's Disclosure Statement described in Paragraph 9 of this Agreement; f.The truth of each and every warranty and representation made by Seller in this Agreementas of the cate of execution thereof and as of the Closing Date; and g.On the Closing Date, the Title Company shall be ready, willing and able to issue to Agency (orother entity selected by Agency at least three (3) days prior to the Closing Date) its standard form CLTA Owner's Policy of title insurance insuring Agency in the amount of the Purchase Price that good and marketable title to the Property is vested in Agency subject only to the exceptions to title set forth in the PTR and approved by Agency. 7.ESCROW. a. The Parties hereto shall enter into Escrow ll:)r the conveyance of the Property in accordance with this Agreement. The Executive Director, on behalf of the Agency, and the Seller shall execute Escrow Instructions as necessary to effectuate and implement this Agreement. b. The Closing Date shall be -3--eed to by the parties but shall not be later than May 30, 1 996. C. Seller shall deliver or cause to be delivered to escrow the Grant Deed in proper form duly executed and in recordable form conveying to Agency fee title to the Property subject only to the exceptions approved by Agency pursuant to Paragraph 3 hereof. R:@OUSING\OTTOPLTRC.CC2 5nl96 edr 8 d. Both parties shall execute and deliver to each other any other documents or instruments which are reasonably necessary in order to consummate the purchase and sale of the Property. e. SellershaildelivertoAgencythroughescrowanaffidavitexecuted by Seller under penalty of perjury stating Seller's United States taxpayer identification number and that Seller is not a foreign person, in accordance with Internal Revenue Code 1 445(2) and such other documents as are required by federal and state tax laws. f. Real propertytaxes and assessments through fiscal year 1 995-96 and 1996-97 shall beprorated as of the Close of Escrow, based upon the latest tax bill available. 9. Agency shall pay the usual recording fees and any required documentary transfer taxes. h. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized and directed to execute such escrow instructions, certificates of acceptance (Government Code Section 27281), and such other documents as are necessary to complete the transactions described in this Agreement. 8. PERMISSION TO ENTER ON PREMISES. Seller hereby grants to Agency, and its designated agents, permission to enter upon the Property at all reasonable times prior to close of escrow for the purpose of making necessary or appropriate inspections and investigations, including but not limited to, conducting a soils, geotechnical, toxic and hazardous substances investigation. Agency shall restore the Property to its original condition after said investigation. 9.HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DISCLOSURE. a. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7, and other laws, Seller is obligated to disclose any knowledge that Seller, or any agent, officer or employee of Seller, has regarding hazardous substances on, in or under the Property. It is understood and agreed between Agency and Seller that the closing of this escrow is subject to and contingent upon receipt and approval, by Agency, of Seller's Disclosure Statement, disclosing if the Seller, or any present or former agent, officer or employee of Seller, knows or has reasonable cause to believe there are any hazardous or toxic substances or materials located on, in, or under the Property. Said Disclosure Statement is subject to Agency's review and approval in its sole discretion. b. It is further understood and agreed that Agency shall, within 20 days from the date of this Agreement, complete said investigations. If the results of this investigation are not satisfactory to Agency, then Agency, in Agency's sole discretion, shall have the right to cancel the escrow with no obligation to Seller. C. As used in this Agreement,the phrase "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any hazardous, toxic, corrosive, reactive, ignitable, carcinogenic or reproductive toxic substance, material, product, compound, chemical or waste (including, without limitation, petroleum, including crude oil, or any fraction thereof, asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, flammable explosives, radioactive materials, and polychlorinated biphenyls) as R:\HOUSING\O'rrOPUIZC.CC2 5nl96 cdr 9 de - fined in or regulated by any federal, state or local law, or@,3inance, regulation or code regarding the environment or health, safety or welfare ('Environmental Law"). 10. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER. Seller hereby represents and warrants as follows: a. The Property is free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments or rights-of-way of any nature whatsoever other than the matters set forth as exceptions in the PTR and approved by the Agency. b. Seller has no knowledge of any order or directive of any applicable Department of Building and Safety, Health Department or any other City, County, State or Federal authority, relating to the Property. C. Seller has complied with, and has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential investigation, proceeding or action (including legislative action) relating to the failure of Seller to comply with any and all statutes, laws, ordinances, regulations, rules and orders of governmental authorities having or claiming jurisdiction relating to the ownership, operation and use of the Property including, but not limited to, compliance with all zoning, health, safety, building and fire regulations and the obtaining and compliance with any and all necessary permits, licenses and certificates of authority. d. Seller shall be responsible to pay to any finder or broker in connection with the sale of the Property. e. Seller is not aware of any Hazardous Materials (as defined below) that have been used, present, released, stored, manufactured, generated or disposed of on, under or about, or transported to or from the Property. f. Tothe best of Seller's knowledge,the Property (including, without limitation, the soil and groundwater thereunder) is not in violation of any Environmental Laws. No above-ground or underground tanks exist on, under or about the Property. 9. All of the documents, information and records provided by Seller to Agency in accordance with this Agreement shall contain true and accurate information and d(- not omit any material fact. h.Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or potential litigation, action orproceeding against Seller or any other party before any court or administrative tribunalwhich is in any way related to the Property. i. All contracts, agreements, understandings and commitments, written or oral, with vendors, affecting any part of the Property, are disclosed in Exhibit B. attached hereto and incorporated herein. i. As of the time of the Closing Date, Seller shall have paid and settled all outstanding debts, claims and other obligations owed by Seller in connection with the ownership of the Property or the maintenance thereof ("Debts"). Agencv is not assuming any Debts. Seller will indemnify and defend Agency from all actions relating to collection of Debts. R:\HOUSING\07rOPLJRC.CC2 5/g/96 cdr 1 0 11. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF Agency. It is understood and agreed between Seller and Agency that the Purchase Price set forth in Paragraph 2 and the relocation benefits set forth in Paragraph 3 herein represents an all inclusive settlement and is full and complete payment for just compensation for the acquisition of all property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and satisfies any and all other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller arising out of the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property, and specifically includes, but is not limited to, pre-condemnation damages, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment Plan, relocation assistance and/or benefits under the Relocation Assistance Act, Government Code Section 7260 et sea., and loss of business goodwill under the Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1 263.51 0. 12. ATTORNEY'S FEES. In the event of any litigation between the Agency and Seller, concerning this transaction, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. 13. ASSIGNMENT. Agency may assign its rights under this Agreement or may designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any such assignment or designation shall not relieve Agency of any of its obligations under this Agreement. 14. NOTICES. All notices called for herein shall be in writing and shall be delivered to Seller and Agency at the addresses set forth in this Paragraph. Notices shall be deemed delivered two (2) business days after first-class mailing, or upon receipt by personal service at the office of the party, delivery by overnight courier service, or by legible and complete facsimile transmission. The following addresses are to which notices shall be sent pursuant to this Paragraph, provided that either party may change its address by proper notice to the other: SELLER: Elizabeth Otto c/o Wally Shandro Coldwell Banker Advantage Realty 27919 Front Street, #101 Temecula, CA 92590 AGENCY: City of Temecula 431 74 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention:City Manager 16.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. a. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. R:\HOUSING\OTTOPURC.CC2 5/8196 cdr b. Both Parties have had the opportunity to be represented by Counsel or professional real estate brokers, and have participated in the drafting of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. SELLER ELIZABETH OTTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA: PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: By June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Peter M. Thorson Agency Counsel R:@HOUSING\O'rrOPURC.CC2 5/g/96 cdr 12 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS APN 922-054-004 Lot 4 Block 37 Town of Temecula Book: 01 5 Page: 726 Lot: 4 APN 922-054-005 Lot 3 Block 37 Town of Temecula Book: 0 1 5 Page: 726 Lot: 3 R:\HOUSING\OTTOPURC.CC2 518/96 cdr 1 3 EXHIBIT B CONTRACTS AFFECTING PROPERTIES March 27, 1996 Letter of Agreement R:\HOUSING@0'rrOPURC.CC2 5/8196 cdr 1 4 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEI\4 I MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD APRIL 23, 1996 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 9:52 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT:5 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall ABSENT:0 BOARD MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and Authority Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Board Member Stone and Chairperson Birdsall abstained on Consent Calendar Item No. 1. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. I . Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 9, 1996. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone, Birdsall Minutes.fa RECESS Chairperson Birdsall recessed the Old Town Westside Community Facilties District Financing Authority at 9:52 PM. JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.Financings for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor Councilmember Stone announced he would abstain due to a conflict of interest and stepped down from the podium. Finance Director Genie Roberts introduced Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig wno presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve staff recommendation as follows: 23.1That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTICN AND DELIVERY OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY 23.2That the City Council adopt a resoli@-@on entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OF ABANDONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS 23.3That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Minutes.fa -2- ITEA4 2 ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF TUE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNrrY FACIIL DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WRMIN THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACIL DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNfrY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOVVN AREA PUBLIC @ROV S) @EREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town[Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to establish the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District') pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), to finance certain facilities; "EREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution maldng findings as to the complexity of the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolutions, as adopted by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Resolution'); V,IHEREAS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the financing of the facilities (the 'Facilities') referenced in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending Resolution; VMEREAS, on March 26, 1996,this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance the costs of the Facilities; V;HEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial Ords. fa\96-01 evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held; WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements ), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within The District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting i..-VY of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District' (the 'Resolution of Formation') 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District' and 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Calling Special Election', which resolutions established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively, and WHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDA@, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rate and in accordance with the formula set forth in the Resolution of Formation which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1996-97 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the 'Bonds') and all costs of the District, including any costs of the administration thereof. 2. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to levied for each fiscal year for each parcel of real property and the interests therein the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds. 3. Properties or entities of the State or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes to the extent set forth in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. In no event shall the special =es be Ords.fa\96-01 2 levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. 4. All of the collection of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the payment of the costs of administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. 5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the tax rolls of the County of Riverside, and the special taxes shall become delinquent at the same time as other taxes collected on such rolls. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the appropriate officials of the County, and to take all action necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all other costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may corect one or more installments of the special taxes by means of direct billing of the owners of real property located within the District, and any intsallment so billed shall be delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. Further, the procedure on foreclosure of property for delinquent special taxes shall be as described in the Section 7 of the Resolution of formation and as further specified in the fiscal agreement providing for the terms of any bonds to be issued for the district to be repaid from the levy of such special taxes. Said procedures may allow for the bond owners or their representatives to credit bid delinquent amounts and penalties and interest and foreclosure costs at the foreclosure sale without posting or paying cash on other compensation, and other wise for reduced minimum bids and other expedited foreclosure procedures. 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. 7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the area of the District. Ords.fa\96-01 3 8. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, , the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson A=T: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OR RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. FA 96-01 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following rofl call vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT:BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED:BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Authority Secretary Ords.fa\96-01 4 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Lindemans NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone RECESS Mayor Lindemans called a recess to execute the Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the City and the Financing Authority at 10:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 1 0: 1 0 PM. 24.Financingsf Area Public Imi2rovements and the Western P - Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 24.1That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE OLD TOWNMESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone 25.FinancinQs for Old Town r P blic Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig presented the staff report. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendations as follows: Minutes.fa -3- 25.1That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY REGARDING MEETINGS, ESTABLISHING A SEAL FOR THE AUTHORITY, DIRECTING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF FORMATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND ESTABLISHING THE RULES FOR ITS PROCEEDINGS 25.2That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ABANDONMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO FORM THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTSIDE AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) 25.3That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)K, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING -N APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING L-=VY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 25.4That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT Minutes.fa -4- 25.5That the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING THE RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone RECESS Chairperson Birdsall called a recess at 10:21 PM to open ballots. The meeting was reconvened at 10:40 PM. City Clerk June Greek announced the ballots had been canvassed and reported the following: There were 1 86 qualified votes, 1 86 were cast, 184 voted "yes" and 2 voted 11 11 no Bond Counsel Paul Thimmig explained that the two "no" votes would be included in the district but would only be taxed if within a year, property is conveyed to Buffman. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Ford to approve staff recommendation 25.6 as follows: 25.6that the Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN Minutes.fa -5- The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member RoDerts to approve staff recommendation 25.7 as follows: 25.7Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Minutes.fa -6- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Meetings at 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary r:\minutes.fa\032696 -7- ITEI\4 2 ORDINANCE NO. FA 96-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNrrY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACHNM DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FAC]ILITI]ES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC @ROVEMENTS) V,IHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, this Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the 'Authority') adopted a resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town[Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the 'Resolution of Intention'), stating its intention to establish the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'District') pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the 'Act'), to finance certain facilities; "EREAS, on October 10, 1995, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the District, on December 12, 1995 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution making fmdings as to the complexity of the proposed District and continuing the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention with respect to the proposed District, and on February 13, 1996 this Board of Directors adopted a resolution further amending the Resolution of Intention to add additional territory to the proposed District, to authorize the financing of additional improvements by the District, to approve a revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District and to increase the authorized bonded indebtedness of the District (said resolutions, as adopted by this Board of Directors on February 13, 1996, is herein called the 'Resolution'); V*IHEREAS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the financing of the facilities (the 'Facilities') referenced in the Resolution of Intention, as amended by the Amending Resolution; "EREAS, on March 26, 1996,this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance the costs of the Facilities; VMER,EAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial Ords.fa\96-01 evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held; AS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Formation of Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. I (Old Town Area Public Improvements ), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within The District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting T VY of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the District' (the 'Resolution of Formation') 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Old Town/ Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District' and 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Calling Special Election', which resolutions established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively, and V,IHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDA , by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rate and in accordance with the formula set forth in the Resolution of Formation which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1996-97 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the 'Bonds') and all costs of the District, including any costs of the administration thereof. 2. The Treasurer of the Authority is herebv authorized and directed to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to levied for each fiscal year for each parcel of real property and the interests therein the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds. 3. Properties or entities of the State or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes to the extent set forth in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. In no event shall the special taxes be Ords.fa\96-01 2 levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes included in the Resolution of Formation. 4. AR of the collection of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, in the Resolution of Formation and any fiscal agent agreement for the Bonds including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the payment of the costs of administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. 5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the tax rolls of the County of Riverside, and the special taxes shall become delinquent at the same time as other taxes collected on such rolls. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Treasurer of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the appropriate officials of the County, and to take all action necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all other costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may cohect one or more installments of the special taxes by means of direct billing of the owners of real property located within the District, and any intsallment so billed shall be delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. Further, the procedure on foreclosure of property for delinquent special taxes shall be as described in the Section 7 of the Resolution of formation and as further specified in the fiscal agreement providing for the terms of any bonds to be issued for the district to be repaid from the levy of such special taxes. Said procedures may allow for the bond owners or their representatives to credit bid delinquent amounts and penalties and interest and foreclosure costs at the foreclosure sale without posting or paying cash on other compensation, and other wise for reduced minimum bids and other expedited foreclosure procedures. 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. 7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the area of the District. Ords.fa%96-01 3 8. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, .1 the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of May, 1996. Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson A=T: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OR RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. FA 96-01 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority on the 23rd day of April, 1996, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors on the 14th of May, 1996, by the following roU call vote: AM: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT:BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAINED:BOARD MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/Authority Secre@ Ords.fa\96-01 4 r ITEI\4 27 ITEI\4 27 kPPROvaw CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE7 CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM:Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199- Zoning Amendment) 'Chardonnay Hills' Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1.Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- 044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96- 0027 (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMENDMENT) INCREASING THE RANGE OF HOUSING SIZES TO 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 1 0, 1 1, AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) 2.Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96- 0027, AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO ALLOW HOUSING SIZES TO A MAXIMUM OF 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 1 0, 1 1, AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) R:\STA 27PA%.CCI 4/261% mf BACKGROUND This item was continued by the City Council at their meeting of April 9, 1996. Several concerned homeowners spoke at the meeting regarding issues pertaining to the Chardonnay Hills project. Staff was directed by the Council to facilitate a meeting with the applicant and the concerned homeowners to clarify timing of several key issues. These issues are: phasing schedule and timing of installation of the greenbelt areas; phasing schedule and timing of installation of the second recreation facility; timing and completion of Butterfield Stage Road and Meadows Parkway; and drainage and erosion in the project area. Staff met with the respective parties on April 22, 1996 to discuss the issues. Issues discussed at the meeting are addressed below. DISCUSSION Phasinci Schedule and Timina of Installation of the Greenbelt Areas The applicant received approval for phasing of Tract Map No. 231 00 and Tract Map No. 231 01 on September 19, 1994 (Planning Applications No. PA94-0078 and PA94-0080). TM 231 00 was divided into eight (8) phases and TM 231 01 was divided into six (6) phases. Conditions of Approval were placed on both subdivisions regarding timing for park improvements (reference Attachment No. 4). Landscape and irrigation plans for the greenbelt are to be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit for any phase that abuts the greenbelt. The greenbelt shall be installed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy of the 16th unit for the phase that abuts the greenbelt. The applicant has provided an overall proposed phasing for the project (reference Attachment N o. 5). Phasina Schedule and Timing of Installation of the Second Recreation Facility The recreation center for Chardonnay Hills was originally to be built adjacent to Meadows Parkway in the central western portion of the project. Due to several circumstances, a recreation center was ultimately built in the southwestern portion of the site. A second recreation facility is planned for Chardonnay Hills, in its original location. This facility is to be installed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy of the 16th unit of the sixth phase of TM23100 (thirty-one total units) or prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy of the 16th unit of the fifth phase of TM23101 (twenty-seven units), whichever comes first. The project is conditioned that the recreation center have comparable amenities to those in the existing park (pool, clubhouse and picnic area). Timina and Coml2letion of Butterfield Stage Road and Meadows Par@ Both of these roads abut the project and neither have been fully improved. Typically streets are improved when the adjacent development occurs. This is the reason why these two roads have not been fully improved. It is anticipated that Meadows Parkway will be improved before Butterfield Stage Road. This is because the "Temeku" project appears to be moving forward and the Chardonnay Hills project appears to be doing the same. R:\STA 7PA%.CCI 4/261% mf 2 Drainage and Erosion in the Proiect Area Erosion has occurred on the site because the site was mass graded, slopes weren't planted and homes were not built. According to the applicant, the erosion and drainage issue is almost completely addressed. They have been dealing with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) since 1992 for non-compliances with NPDES regulations. Erosion control measures have been in place for several years now and the situation appears to be stabilized. The applicant is awaiting a letter of compliance form the EPA. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1 . City Council Resolution No. 96- - Page 4 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Page 9 2. City Council Ordinance No. 96- - Page 1 1 3.April 9, 1996 City Council Staff Report - Page 1 5 4.Conditions of Approval for Phasing Map - Page 16 5. Applicant's Overall Phasing of Development - Page 1 7 R:\STA A%.CCI 4126196 mf 3 APPRO@ ORNEY OF Fl'q AGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council/City Manager FROM:Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director DATE:April 9, 1996 SUBJECT:Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan NO. 199 - Zoning Amendment) - 'Chardonnay Hills' Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: 1 .Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96- 0027 (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMENDMENT) INCREASING THE RANGE OF HOUSING SIZES TO 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 1 0, 1 1, AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) 2.Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96- 0027, AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO ALLOW HOUSING SIZES TO A MAXIMUM OF 3,200 SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 1 0, 1 1, AND 12 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE) R:@STA 27PA%.CC 3t28/% mf BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting that Specific Plan No. 1 99 be amended to allow a greater range of housing sizes in Planning Areas 6, 1 0, 1 1 and 1 2. The maximum square footage currently allowed in Planning Area No. 6 is 2,1 00 square feet and the maximum square footage allowed in Planning Areas 1 0, 1 1 and 1 2 is 2,600 square feet. The Amendment would allow up to 3,200 square foot houses in these Planning Areas. Staff supports the increase because it allows greater flexibility for the developer and does not increase the density in the Planning Areas. Beacuse of a full agenda, and some items taking more time to consider than anticipated, the Planning Commission continued this item from March 4, to March 1 8, whereupon they recommended approval of the project by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Webster was absent). There was no Commission discussion on this item. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1 City Council Resolution No. 96- - Page 3 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Page 6 2. City Council Ordinance No. 96- - Page 9 3.March 18, 1996 Planning Commission Staff Report (Contains March 4, 1996 Staff Report) - Page 13 R:\TRA 27PA%.CC 3129/% mf 2 MEMORANDUM TO:Planning Commission FROM:Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director DATE:March 18, 1996 SUBJECT:Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) - Amendmentto Planning Areas No. 6, 10, 11 and 12 of Specific Plan No. 199 to increase housing square footage to a maximum of 2,1 00 and 2,600 to 3,200 square feet Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1.ADOPT Resolution No. 96-- recommending approval of kPA96-0027 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; amid 2.APPROVE Planning Application No. 96-0027, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND This item was continued by the Planning Commission at their meeting of March 4, 1996. The resolution has been changed to reflect the continuance of this item by the Planning Commission. Attachments: 1 PC Resolution No. 96- - Blue Page 2 A.Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 6 2. ,,,,Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 4, 1996 - Blue Page 8 R:\ST A%.P= 3114/% mf ATRA NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMEENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0027 (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALLRFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF . BUT STAGE ROAD AND ]KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 10, 11, AND 1-2 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 GARITA VILLAGE) WHEREAS, Bramalea California, Inc., BCVCCL Venture No. 1 and BCIJCTL Venture No. 2 filed Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; , Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; the Planning Commission continued P g Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on March 4, 1996, at a duly noticed pub hearin- as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either m support or in opposition; , the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on March 18, 1996, at a duly noticed.public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; , at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to P g Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment); -i-NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLAN@G CO SION OF THE CITY OF CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings, A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No - PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment), makes the following findin-s, to wit: A%.PM 3113/% mf 3 1.Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) inconsistent with the City's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Villa-e. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of an expansion to the maximum square footage of single-family residences in an area that is comprised of a variety of sizes of single-family residences. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199. 5. Ile changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overa.U intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 202. The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. It has been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. It is Staff s opinion that due to the limited scope of the proposed Zoning Amendment, there will be no affect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur- with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 4. Conditions. Ilat the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0027, (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zonint, Amendment) on property located north of Rancho California Road, east of Meadows Parkway, south.@@ Serena Way, and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Planning Areas 6, 1 0, I 1, and 12 of Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita VMa-e) subject to the fonowin- conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. R:\STAFFR7nZ7PA%.PM 3/13f% mf 4 y of @ch, 1996. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPM this 18th da LIM A FAHEY Y CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the P@c, Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the i8th day of March, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AY-F-S: PLANNING CO@SSIONERS: NOF,S: PLANNING CONMSSIONERS: ABSENT:PLANNING CO@SSIONERS: Dii UBNOS CE SECRETARY R:\STA A96.PC2 3113/% mf I I EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -i@ It:@A A%.PM 3/13/% mf 6 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) ning Areas No - 6, 1 0, 1 1 and 1 2 of Specific Project Description: Amendment to Plan Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village to increase housing square footage to a maximum of from 2,1 00 and 2,600 to 3,200 square feet Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT GeneralRequirements 1 .The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Zoning Amendment - Specific Plan No. 199) which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21 000 et sea., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of Lhe action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless-the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. 2.The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for Specific Plan No. 199, and its amendments, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. 3. Specific Plan Text Amendments shall conform with Attachment No. 2. Within@Thirty (30) Days From the Second Reading of The Ordinance Approving the Amendment 4.The applicant shall submit the Amended Specific Plan text to the Planning Department. R:\STA A96.PC2 3/13/% mf 1, ATTACHMENT NO. 2 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED MARCH 4,1996 ,are R:ISTA A%.PC2 3113/% mf 8 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 4, 1996 Planning Application No. PAS6-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1PT Resolution No. 96-_ recommending approval of PA96-0027 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and 3 2.APPROVE Planning Application No. 96-0027,subject'to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Bramalea California, Inc. and CCL Construction, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE:Bramalea California, Inc.: Emile Haddad CCL Construction, Inc.: Charlie Kluger PROPOSAL:Amendment to Planning Areas No. 6, IO, I 1 and 1 2 of Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village to increase housing square footage to a maximum of from 2,1 00 and 2,600 to 3,200 square f eet LOCATION:North of Rancho California Road, east of Meadows Parkway, south of La Serena Way, and west of Butterfield Stage Road PROJECT STATISTICS Existing H )usin i Sizes Pro[) e Housin Siz 1, 500-@ 2,600 square f eet (Planning Areas 1 0, 1 1, 1 2) 1,500 - 3,200 square feet 1,200 - 2,1 00 square feet (Planning Area 6) 1,500 - 3,200 square feet BACKGROUND Planning Application No. PA96-0027 was formally submitted to the Planning Department on February 1 6, 1996. Because of the limited scale of the changes to the Specific Plan text, no Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held for this project. ILWR A%.pC 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a request to expand the range of allowable square footage for housing types in Planning Areas 6, 10, 11 and 12 of Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village (reference Attachment No. 2). ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting that Specific Plan No. 199 be amended to allow a greater range of housing sizes in the subject Planning Areas. The applicant states: 'market feedback indicates a demand for a bigger home' (reference Attachment No. 4). The maximum square footage allowed in Planning Area No. 6 is 2,1 00 square feet and the maximum square footage allowed in Planning Areas 1 0, 1 1 and 1 2 is 2,600 square feet. The Amendment would allow up to 3,200 square foot houses in these Planning Areas. Staff can support the increase because it allows greater flexibility for the developer and does not increase the density in the Planning Areas. The applicant has submitted an exhibit which shows the existing development and where proposed development will be located. Staff will reviewlthe siting of the houses to assure that they are compatible with the existing houses in terms of color, materials and scale. This review will be accomplished through the model home complex application which has been submitted for Staff review. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION t The existing zoning for the project site is SP (Specific Plan). The current General Plan designation for the project site is LM - Low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre). The applicant is not proposing any change to the density of the project. The project is consistent with the existing zoning and General Plan Designation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. It has been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. It is Staff's opinion that due to the limited scope of the proposed Zoning Amendment, there will be no affect on the previous analysis. According to Section 211 66 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new.,.ip,formation, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomesavailable. Noneofthesesituationshasoccurred;therefore,nofurtherenvironmental analysis is required. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The applicant is requesting that Specific Plan No. 199 be amended to allow a greater range of housing sizes in Planning Areas 6, 1 0, 1 1 and 1 2. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and existing zoning. No additional environmental review is required for this project. P-W A%.PC nw 2 FINDINGS ific Plan No. 1 99 - Zoning Amendment), as Planning Application No- 96-0027 (Spec the community- ith the health, safety and welfare of proposed, is compatible w Planning Application No. 96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) 2. inconsistent with the City's General Plan , due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. 3.The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of an increase in the maximum square footage of single-family residences in an area that is comprised of a variety of sizes of single-family residences. 4.The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Spe i ific Plan No. 1 99. 5.The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 202 . The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Attachments: 1 . PC Resolution - Blue Page 4 A.Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8 2.Proposed Specific Plan Text Amendment - Blue Page 1 0 3.Exhibits - Blue Page 1 1 A.Vicinity Map B.Zoning Map C.General Plan Map D.Existing and Proposed Development 4. Letter From Applicant Dated February 14, 1996 - Blue Page 12 R-\Sr A%.Pc 7ns/% nw 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- IL= A%.PC nw 4 ATRACHMENT NO- 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO SION OF TE[E CrrY OF CULARFCO ING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0027 (SPECMC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMEND ON PR PERTY LOCATED NORTE[ OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, WEST OF B STAGE ROAD AND -KNOWN AS P G AREAS 6, 10, 11, AND 12 OF SPECIRC PLAN No. 199 GARrrA VRLLAGE) S, Bramalea California, Inc. and CCL Construction, Inc. f4ed Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; , Planning Application No. PA9&=7 (Specific Plan NO- 199 - Zoning Amendment) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; considered planning Application No. PA96-0027 the P g Commission (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on March 4, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; S, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ifany, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Co mmission considered all facts relating to Pg Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment); NOW,ORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CULA,DOES RESOLVE, DE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section1. That the above recitations are true and correct. in in @ection 2. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan NO. 199 - Zoning Amendment) @ makes the following findings, to wit: 1 . P g Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan NO. 199 - Zoning Amendment), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan NO. 199 - Zoning Amendment) inconsistent with the City's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. R-\Sr A%.PC 5 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. Tle project consists of an expansion to the maximum square footage of single-family residences in an area that is comprised of a variety of sizes of single-family residences. 4. 'ne proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199. 5. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 202. Ile mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Section 3. Environmental Compliance, Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the County Board of Suw-rlvisors. It has been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. It is Staff s opinion ffi= due to the limited scope of the proposed Zoning Amendment, there will be no affect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being unde@n which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 4. Conditions, That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0027, (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on property located north of Rancho California Road, east of Meadows Parkway, south of La Serena Way, and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Planning Areas 6, 1 0, I 1, and 12 of Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereol R-W A%.PC nw 6 ED. APPROVIED AND ADOYM this 4th day of March, 1996. Section 5. PASS Y CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the P9 f March, Commission of the City of Temecula at a reg@ meeting thereof, held on the 4th day 0 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING CONMSSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING Co@SSIONF-RS: ABSENT:PLANNING COWZSSIONERS: SKE SECRETARY IL\gr AM.PC 7 t I 3 F- rr A k CONDMONS OF APPROVAL iL'= A%.PC 8 CITY OF CLTLA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 99 - Zo g Amendment) pedfic Plan No. 1 nm p g Application No. PA96-0027 (S - 6, 101 11 and 12 of SPedrlc On: Amendment top Areas No project D@Pti arita Village to increase housing square footage to a um Plan NO. 199 - Marg are feet of from 2,100 and 2,600 to 3,200 squ Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DFPAR General Requirements licant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless' the City and I The developer/aPP thereof, and/or any of its officers, employ" and agents any agency or instrumentality from any and all Claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, instrumentality thereof, or any resulting from an approval of the City, Or any void, annul, or seek monetary damages , appeal board or legislative body agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency the Planning Application of the City, concerning including actions approved by the voters 199) which action is brought No. pA96-0027 (Zoning Amendment - Specific Plan NO. lic Resources Code, Division within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Pub s Section 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 91 M., including but not by the way of limitation 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/apPlicant Of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall @er cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any Of its officers, employees, or agents- Specific Plan 2.The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for No. 199, and its amendments, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. 3. ,jpecific Plan Text Amendments @ conform with Attachment No. 2. Within Thirty (30) Days From the Second Reading of The Ordinance Approving the Amendment 4.The applicant shall submit the Amended Specific Plan text to the Planning Department- IL@ A%.PC 2n%/% 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PROPOSED SPECIFIC,PLAN AMENDMENT IL'%SR A%.PC nw 10 3.village "B" Architectural Guidelines a. introduction Village "B" shall contain two basic architectural mot'-ps a third custom area adjacent to the vineyards cri.thc- and ause the two,neigh- eastern boundary of the property. Bec borhoods will comprise the majority of Village "B", these guidelines will predominantly address those areas. The basic architectural themes for Village "B" will be Szanish, Mediterranean, and French Manor. Planning Areas ZP8 and 10/ii/12 will have a combination of Medi'erra- neanand French elevation styles. Planning Areas 4 and 6 willhave a combination of Suanish and Mediterranean el-=-va- tions.The Custom homes in Planning Areas 7 and 9 shall combine all three elevation styles; French, Suanish and Mediterranean. This is a natural combination of'stylet for the Rancho 'California area and will provide a variety of elevations as well as giving each development area a seda- rate character. The Mediterranean style will provide the blend -between the various planning areas and the Scanish and French will provide the necessary accent to keep the visual interest within the projects. All design elements used in Village "all should work together to achieve a sense of neighborhood identity. h). Buildina Mass, Form and Scale Village "El shall include a range of dwelling unit, sizes n proportion to the size of the project. There shall also be a v-ariety of elevation types per plan throughout the mro- ject. A sense of neighborhood will- be accomplished by manipulating the building mass, form.. and scale within each planning area. shall 0The homes in Planning Areas 2, 3, 8 imsix.*:Ri:k*2E:kk range in size from 1500 SC. ft. to approximately 2600 SC. ft. and a minimum of :Cive (5) floor plans shall- be provided. 0The homes in Planning Areas 4@:6xshall range size from 1200 sq. ft. to aunroximately zloo sq. ft. with a minimum of five'(5) floor plans. 0The Custom homes in Planning Areas 7 and 9 shall have a minimum of iaoo sq. ft. of living area. 0The structures will consist of one and two story eleva- tions with the one story elements being used at front setbacks and at corner lot configurations. 0The homes in Planning Areas 10/11/12 shall rands z--n size from 1500 sq. ft. to approximately 3200 sq. ft.---7.d a minimum of three (3) floor plans shall be provided. 0The homes in Planning Area 6 shall range in size from 1500 sq. ft. to approximately 3200'sq. ft. with a mimimum of three (3) floor plans. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS IL-WR A%.PC 1 1 CITY OF TEMECULA 07 Ov ITE 103 Du NO. PA96-0027 (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING AMENDMENT) VICINITY MAP 31T - A INING COMMISSION DATE MARCH 4,1996 R:\STA '7PA%.PC =71% CITY OF TEMECULA SP NG MAP 3P (SPECIFIC PLAN) OITE Os VL FLM L%t p LM ,%4 H VL @ros :RAL PLAN .M (LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) -0 SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMENDMENT) 1ISSION DATE - MARCH 4,1996 'PA96.PC 2!:'/Q6 mf Clfll4lk @ONNIIY tilde amorchard Vacant Production Lots Orchard Inventory Homes Orchard Closed Homes NW Orchard Models 7,- - -Vineyard Vacant ProducLion Lots MoVincyard Inventory Homes I=VineyiLrd Closed Ho-es Vineyard N4odcls Models ParLing Lot Closed Chateau and Vintage Product Graded Lots Raw Lots @,.Brumalca Vacant Lzts Recreation Center Streets Unpaved Paved - uncapped @Paved - Capped EXHIBIT CASE C) Pr, nw ATTACHMENT NO. 4 I LETTER FROM APPLICANT DATED FEBRUARY 14,1996 IL- = A%.FC ZW% nw 1 2 Z742' . Caile A:-'O'.'O Sar. Juar. CaPLS::ar@ February 14, 1996 Mr. Mathew Fagan City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecu@ CA 92590 Re:ChardonnaY Hills DearMathew: Thank you for meeting with us last Monday to d . iscuss our future plans and for your inuous assistance on the Chardonnay EMS Community- cont you a brief history Of this community as well Before I discuss our future plans, let me give started under, the ownership of as the status of Bramalea- The Chardonnay gills community was Marlborough Development Corporation, a subsidary of Bramalea California, Inc. The community was opened in 1989 offering two products known a's Chateau and Vintage with sizes ranging from eet. Approximately 130 homes were built between 1989 and 1993 when 1,520 to 2,795 square f ea purchased the project from the lender chose to stop funding. By the end of 1993, Bramal Marlborough and approximately 160 homesites out of the remaining 475 homesites were put into a partnership with CCL Development with Bramalea acting as the general partner. During 1994 two new down-sized products were developed. The Orchards and Vineyards range in size from 1,265 to 2,479 square feet. During this process, Bramalea gave up four custom lots in Tract, 23103-1 to build an additional recreation center since the original recreation center is located in an ungraded portion of the project and. as a reswt of the market condition w@ delayed beyond our On' ginally anticipated completion date. It is worth mentioning that the second recreation center, which is now complete, is fully amenitized and was planned at Bramalea's sole discretion to accommodate the existing homeowners and help our marketing efforts. As you are aware, in early 1995 and because of its parent's financial situation, Bramalea Califorrua fnc. had to Me Chapter -1 1 and in order not the make the new project (Orchards and Vineyards) suffer, Bramalea turned over its general partnership interest to CCL Development who has carried through with the construction of the community. Bramalea is in the process of filing a plan of reorganization in the bankruptcy court and is expected to emerge out of bankruptcy soon under a new owner. Lennar Homes, Inc. is going to be the owner of the company and all future development will be done under Lennar's name. Mathew Fagan February 14, 1996 Page Two Lennar is the seventh largest home builder in the United States based in Florida. Bramalea's acquisition will be Lennar's first entry into California. We are currently in plan check for new models ranging in size between 2,500 and 3,200 square feet which would be built on the remaining, or a portion of the remaining 315 homesites. The good news is that the market feedback indicates a demand for a bigger home which means that the median price is being pushed up. Our plan is to start models by the first part of Aipril. We are also submitt'mg a request to amend the language in the Specific Plan to allow the construction of homes up to 3,200 square feet within Village "B" of the Santa Margarita Specific Plan. Please note that as a result of the future development, additional utilities will be installed, streets will be construct, and slopes will be landscaped, which will reduce the erosion problem that has haunted us for the past few years. It will also provide a more fully developed community. I have attached a colored exhibit indicating the status of the construction within the cor=unity. We are very excited about the new models and are looking forward to a fresh start. Again, thank you fo: p- S' dent EI<H:db Enclosurd@@ ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PHASING MAPS R:\STAFF@27PA96.CCI 4126/% mf 1 6 Cl@ OF TEMECULA CONDi,riONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0078 (Minor Change - Subdivision: Tentative Tract Map No. 23100) Project Description: Minor Chainge to Condition of Approval No. 20.a. of Tentative Tract Map No. 231 00 pertainint; to timing for the installation of park facilities. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 95:3-060-024 and 953-060-025 Approval Date: Seritember 19, 1994 Expiration Date: Noifember 8, 1995 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1The subdivider shall defend, inclemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Cit@ of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA94-0078 (Minor Change - Tentative Tract Map No. 231 00) which action is brought within I:he time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The C,ity of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the. City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the Cit,@ fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 2.This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199. 3.The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 5. 4.The project and all subsequent Projects within this site shall c -. mply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR Plo. 202. 5The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for "-entative Tract Map No. 231 00, extensions of time, and amendments unless superseded by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 6. Condition of Approval No. 20.a. of TTM 231 00 shall be modfied to read: Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 7.Prior to the approval of any priacise grading plans for TM 23100-5 or TM 23101-4 (whichever occurs first), the appi icant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the open space adjacent to TM 23100-5 to the R:@A 78PA94.PC 9120/94 kh Planning Department for review and approval. S.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for either TM 23100-6 or TM 231 01 - 5 (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the linear park within TM 23100-6 and 231 01 - 5 to the Planning Department for review and approval. 9.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 23101-6, the applicant shall submit an administrative plot plan and landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the recreation center and park within TM 23101-6 to the Planning Department for review and approval. Said recreation center shall have the comparable amenities contained in the park located within TM 23103 and be consistent with the requirements contained in Specific Plan No. 1 99. 10.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 231 00-2, the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the recreation center and park contained within TM 23103-1 to the Planning Department for review and approval. ii.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for TM 23100-6, TM 23100-7, TM 23100-8, TM 23101-5 or TM 23101-6, a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required, Aany necessary mitigation measures shall be implemented, so long as the Gnatcatcher status as a threatened or endangered species under Federal or State law requires such assessment and/or mitigation by the applicant. (Amended at the Planning Commission hearing September 'tS, 1994). Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 1 2.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit for TM 23100-5, or TM 23101-4 (whichever occurs first), the open space adjacent to these phases shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Pianning Department shall inspect the open space for conformance with the approved plans. 13.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit of TM 23100-6 or TM 23101-5 (whichever occurs first), the linear park adjacent to these phases shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the linear park for conformance with the approved plans. 14.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit of TM 23101-6, the recreation center and park within this phase shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the recreation center and park for conformance with the approved plans. 15.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit for TM 23100-2 the recreation center and park within 23103-1 shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowners's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the R:= 78PA%.PC 9r2l/94 kk 12 recreation center and park for conformance with the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 6.The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 231 00, extensions of time, and amendments. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 17.The applicant shall comply with all TCSD Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 231 00, extensions of time, and amendments unless superseded by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 18.All park sites identified within Tract No. 231 00 shall be owri--d and maintained by an established Homeowner's Association. R:\STAFFRFn78PA%.PC 9 IZ 13 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0079 (Minor Change - Subdivision: Tentative Tract Map No. 23101) Project Description: Minor Change to Condition of Approval No. 23 of Tentative Tract Map No. 23101 pertaining to timing for the installation of park facilities. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 953-050-014and 953-050-015 Approval Date: September 19, 1994 Expiration Date: November 8, 1995 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA94-0079 (Tentative Tract Map No. 231 0 1) which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Sectiori 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 2.This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199. 3.The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 5. 4.The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. 5 .The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 231 01, extensions of time, and amendments unless superseded by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 6.Condition of Approval No. 23. of TTM 23101 shall be modified to read: Priorto Issuance of Grading Permits 7.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 23100-5 or TM 23101-4 (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the open space adjacent to TM 23100-5 to the Planning Department for review and approval. R:\S'rA 78PA94.PC 9@ kb 15 8Prior to theapproval of any precise grading plansfor either TM23100-6 or TM23101- 5 (whichever occurs first), the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along withthe appropriate filing feesforthe linear park withinTM 23100-6and 23101- 5 to the Planning Department for review and approval. 9.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 231 01 -6, the applicant shall submit an administrative plot plan and landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the recreation center and park within TM 23101-6 to the Planning Department for review and approval. Said recreation center shall have the comparable amenities contained in the park located within TM 23103 and be consistent with the requirements contained in Specific Plan No. 1 99. 10.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 23100-2, the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the recreation center and park contained within TM 23103-1 to the Planning Department for review and approval. 11.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for TM 23100-6, TM 23100-7, TM 23100-8, TM 23101-5 or TM 23101-6, a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required, Aany necessary mitigation measures shall be implemented, so long as the Gnatcatcher status as a threatened or endangered species under Federal or State law requires such assessment and/or mitigation by the applicant. (Amended at the Planning Commission hearing September 19, 1994). Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 1 2.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit f or the 1 6th unit f or TM 231 00-5, or TM 23101-4 (whichever occurs first), the open space adjacent to these phases shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the open space for conformance with the approved plans. 13.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit of TM 23100-6 or TM 23101-5 (whichever occurs first), the linear park adjacent to these phases shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the linear park for conformance with the approved plans., 14.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit of TM 23101-6, the recreation center and park within this phase shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowner's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the recreation center and park for conformance with the approved plans. 1 5.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 16th unit for TM 23100-2 the recreation center and park within 23103-1 shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowners's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the recreation center and park for conformance with the approved plans. R:W 7$PA%.PC 9/71/% M 16 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 16.The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 231 0 1, extensions of time, and amendments. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 17.The applicant shall comply with all TCSD Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 23101, extensions of time, and amendments ur-liess superseded by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 18.All park sites identified within Tract No. 231 01 shall be owned and maintained by an established Homeowner's Association. R:= 7$PA%.Pc 9 kb 17 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0080 (Revised Map - Tentative Tract Map No. 23103) Project Description: A proposal to combine 4 lots into one, creating one open space lot, reducing the total number of lots from 18 to 16, and recording the map in two phases. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 953-060-030,953-060-012,953-060-026 and 953-050-009 Approval Date: September 19, 1994 Expiration Date: November 8, 1995 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Planning Application No. PA94-0080 (Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 - Revised Map) which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 2.This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199. 3.The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 5. 4.The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. 5 .The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 23103, extensions of time, and amendments unless superseded by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. Priorto Issuance of Grading Permits 6.Prior to the approval of any precise grading plans for TM 23100-2, the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate filing fees for the recreation center and park contained within TM 23103-1 to the Planning Department for review and approval. R:@A 78PA94.PC 9/201% kb 19 Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 7.Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 1 6th unit for TM 23100-2 the recreation center and park within 23013-1 shall be installed per the approved plans and annexed into the Homeowners's Association. Evidence of the annexation shall be provided to the Planning Department. The Planning Department shall inspect the recreation center and park for conformance with the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 8.The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 23103, extensions of time, and amendments unless superseded by the Conditions ot Approval contained herein. 9.Condition of Approval No. 38 for Tentative Tract Map No. 23 103 should be revised to include 'City Mylar." 10.Conditions of Approval Nos. 56-58 should be revised to state the assigned street names. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 11.All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works. 1 2.The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or'broken due to construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 1 3.All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 14.The park land dedication requirement (Quimby) for Tract No. 23103 has been satisfied with the payment of $20,700 for in-lieu fees on November 25, 1992. 15.All perimeter slopes and parkway landscaping, designated as Temecula Community Service Department (TCSD) maintenance areas, shall be identified and offered for dedication to the City as a maintenance easement on the final map. Underlying ownership of the respective areas shall remain with the individual property owner or the Homeowner's Association. R:ASTA@Pn78PA94.PC 9170/% 20 1 6.All slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians shall be improved in conformance with the city of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 17.Construction of all perimeter landscaping, trails, and landscaped medians that are proposed for dedication to the TCSD shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 1 8.The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all park facilities, perimeter slopes and landscaping, trails and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or the Homeowner's Association. 1 9.All perimeter walls, entry monumentation, interior slopes, and open space shall be maintained by the individual property owners or an established Homeowner's Association. 20.Pursuant to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Class 11 Bike Lanes shall be constructed along Rancho California Road and Butterfield Stage Road in concurrence withtheroadwayimprovementsfortheproject. Wherepermissible,ClassliBikeLanes shall be constructed to allow on-street parking. Prior to Recorez!tion of the Final Map 21.Landscape construction drawings for all project areas identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to recordation of the final map. in addition, the developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve any respective perimeter slopes, landscaping, and medians that are proposed for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 22.Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phased map, the developer or his designee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Number assigned to the final project. 23.Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phased map, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate fees for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the maintenance program. OTHER AGENCIES 24.The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated August 26, 1994, a copy of which is attached. 25.The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Calif ornia Water District transmittal dated September 14, 1994, a copy of which is attached. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing September 19, 1994). R:@A@7SPA94.PC 9r2i/94 m 2 1 Eastern MunicipaiN, aterdistrict G,ner.1 of D,.cia,i J. Andre. Schiange Ches'er C Gilberr, Pres@nt Wm. G. Aldrk*. Vbcc Presiaent LeRai Co.niel Marbon V. Ashky Redwine and Sherrill Rodger D. Siems Ricn@ R- Hall Dj"clo, of The Mos@l"n WOer Diyt"ci ol Sousbem @iomia Sec'e'47 E"ic F. Boen Mary C White Treai.re, Ro,ters M RECEIVED Aug= 26, 1994 AUG 3 0 1994 Am'd............ Matthew Fagan, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: PA 94-0080 (Revised TM 23103) Dear Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed the materials tted by your office which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: General It is our understanding the subject project is a proposal to revise TM 23103, located along the west side of Butterfield Stage Road and north of Rancho California Road, and reduce the total niunber of lots from 18 to 15. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. Sani!M Sewer. The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility (TVR@). Mal'I To: Post Office Box 8300 - San Jacinto, California 92581-8300 - Telephone (909) 925-7676 - Fax (909) 929-025'0 Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto - Customer @ice/Engincering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue. hcmer, C,-\ Matthew Fagan PA 94-0080 August 26, 1994 Page 2 Judging from District records, the nearest existing TVRWU system s@tary sewer facilities to the subject project are as follows: m8-inch diameter sewer aligned along Ahem Lane, east of Promenade Bordeaux and terminating at the western boundary of the subject project. 08-inch diameter sewer aligned along Chemin Clinet, east of Promenade Chardonnay Hills and terminating at the western boundary of the subject project. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, ext. 468. Very truly yours, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT David G. Crosley Senior Engineer Customer Service Department DGC/cz AB 94-697 (wp-ntwk-PA940080.ciz) September 14, 1994 Watr Mr. Matthew Fagan City of Temecula SEP Planning Department MU ri LA Board f D. mmo-: 43174 Business Park Drive Doug R.Iberg Temecula, CA 9259@3606 Je@y L-.MinkJer @, V.- P-..d.ni SUBJEC-R: Water Availability Ralph H. Daily TR 23103 .4@cy *L Hughes Margarita Village Specific Plan 199 (Village B) C"b F. Ko r'A94-00'00 (Revisect Tract lvlap) Li" "'. Peterson Rich@ D. Steffey Dear Mr. Fagan: Officers: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the John F. Hennilrar boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, PhiUip L- For@ therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements D.@@.fFi.a.c.- between RC@ and the property owner. Tm&.u-, E.P. Mob' Lemom D,@ro(Enpnft..gWater availability would be contingent upon the property owner si&ming an Ke@eth C. DealyAgency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to R@. D,@r.fOpe-tions &.',I..nt.."ce Per" F- @uckRC@ will require the construction of a 30-inch transmission main along C.nt-it.,Butterfield Stage Road from Rancho California Road to the limits of this tract Linda M. Fmg@map. RC@ will finance the cost to upsize from the required tract facility Jennings. Engstmndto the 30-inch pipeline. L&, CH. 7 C@. k. -"iIf you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager SB:M:chO8/Fl86 cc:Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician .@ncno C,Iiromia Water District ..... ....... . n T 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 APPLICANT'S OVERALL PHASING FOR THE PROJECT R:NSTA 27PA96.CCI 4/26/% mf 1 7 CHARDONNAY HILLS TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PHASING LEGEND: PROPOSED PHASING-CONSTRUCT70N ITEI\4 2 8 APPR CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF Fl CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council/City Manager FROM:Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director@@ DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Annexation Guidelines for City of Temecula Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0125 ADOPTING ANNEXATION GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA. BACKGROUND This item was continued from the April 9, 1996 City Council meeting. Previously, on February 5, 1 996, the Planning Commission held a Workshop to discuss the proposed Annexation Guidelines. This Workshop was a result of City Council direction to staff for guidelines to evaluate annexation proposals. At that time, the Council was considering a number of annexation proposals. These included the Johnson Ranch, Roripaugh Ranch, and Silverhawk (Pulte Homes) projects. These projects individually and cumulatively could have a significant impact on the City in terms of future population and the required municipal services. The intent of the Annexation Guidelines is to assist the Planning Commission and the City Council in weighing the advantages and disadvantages of annexation requests. These Guidelines are based on the General Plan's Annexation Goals and Policies. The task of creating these Guidelines has proved to be very challenging. On one hand, the Guidelines need to be specific and rigid to allow careful consideration of annexation proposals, but on the other hand, the Guidelines need to be general and flexible to allow them to be used for different types of annexation proposals. The Community Development Department has worked with the Public Works, Community Services, and Finance Departments in preparing these Guidelines. At the February 5, 1996 Workshop, the Planning Commission provided direction to staff on a number of issues which were subsequently addressed by staff at the March 18, 1996 Planning Commission hearing. At that hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Annexation Guidelines Checklist with a 4-0 vote with Commissioner Webster R:\STA 125PA95.CC 5/6196 sn 1 absent as a result of illness. Subsequent to the Planning Commission recommendation, Staff has made a number of minor clarifications to the checklist. Please refer to Exhibit A of Attachment 1 for the modifications to criterions 6, 7, 21, 23, 24, and 25. The strike out words have been eliminated and the bolded words have been added as new language. DISCUSSION How does the Annexation Guidelines Checklist work? Theproposed Guidelines have been prepared in a checklist format to allow a quick review of theadvantages and drawbacks of any proposed annexation (refer to Exhibit A of Attachment 1).The categories of criteria used in these Guidelines are listed at the top of each page in the Checklist and include the following: General Infrastructure Fiscal Land Use 41 Parks and Recreation The table contains several criteria followed by the possible benefit(s) to the City. For each new annexation proposal, staff wouic --omplete the tables with check marks in appropriate spaces. A project with many 'Yes"es could be a good candidate for annexation; on the other hand, a project with many "No's is perhaps not a very good candidate for annexation. It should be noted that each criteria has a different weight and more "Yes'es than "No"s does not necessarily mean that the project should be annexed to the City. If a criteria does not apply to a particular project, the N/A box will be checked. Staff recommends against a numeric scoring system that assigns scores for different criteria. While this approach may appear to be objective, it can provide highly subjective or misleading results. Annexation Area Priority Map The Commission expressed concerns about the need for, and possible problems with, identifying certain areas for annexation at the first Workshop. As a result, staff significantly revised the Priority Map and further clarified its advisory role as part of the Checklist. This new Priority Map includes three categories of high, medium, and low priority (refer to Exhibit B of Attachment 1). In order to establish the priority areas for the annexation areas, staff referred back to the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that it is the City's desire to annex areas pri@- , to, or concurrent with, project approvals in order to exercise control over the use, quality a,-.d design of development, as well as ensure the adequacy of PLZ)IIC facilities and amenities (Goal No. 7). Moreover, Policy No. 7.1 indicates that the City should annex lands to the City that can be developed in accordance with the General Plan and can be adequately served by public facilities and utility services. R:\ST 125PA95.CC 5/6196 an 2 The General Plan Growth Management Element includes a policy which encourages setting priorities for growth areas (Policy 2.6). In staff's opinion, if the Commission and Council want to pro-actively influence the future development of the Sphere of Influence, the City needs to prioritize the annexation areas. The advantage of taking a pro-active role is that it can help to increase control over our Sphere of Influence. One of the disadvantages of pro-active annexation is the potential for negative short-term fiscal impact to the City. Another drawback is that many property owners may not wish to become part of the City. The Priority Map is a part of the Checklist and does not override the Checklist. If a project is consistent with the Annexation Priority Map, it simply receives a 'Yes'; if it is not, it receives a 'No'. Just like all the other criteria in the Checklist, a 'No" in this column does not automatically stop the City from further analyzing the annexation proposal. Therefore, the General Plan makes it clear that the high priority areas for annexation should be those areas with no entitlements. At this time, these areas include the Johnson Ranch and Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plans, some areas within the French Valley Area, the escarpment area to the west of the City Limits, and the Rainbow Canyon and Pechanga Creek areas to the southwest of the City Limits. Staff then recommends that the Redhawk, Vail Ranch, Silverhawk, Rancho Bella Vista, and the French Valley Specific Plans become the medium priority areas. The rest of French Valley would then become a low priority areas because of its distance from the City. FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: 1 . CC Resolution - Blue Page 4 Exhibit A. Annexation Guidelines Checklist - Page 7 Exhibit B. Annexation Priority Map - Page 8 2.Planning Commission Staff Report March 18, 1996 - Page 1 5 3.Planning Commission Workshop Staff Report February 5, 1996 - Page 16 4. General Plan Goals and Policies Regarding Annexations - Page 17 R:\ST 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 sn 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:\STAFFRM125PA95.CC 516/96 m 4 ATTAC NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0125 ADOPTING ANNEXATION GUI]DEL@ FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA. WHEREAS, State Planning and Zoning Law requires a City to adopt a General Plan; and, WHEREAS, State Planning and Zoning Law states that a local General Plan may contain issues the local government deems necessary and appropriate to address local concerns; and, AS, The City adopted its General Plan on November 9, 1993; and, WHEREAS, The General Plan contains numerous policies on the subject of annexation; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Annexation Guidelines Checklist is consistent with the adopted General Plan for the City; and, WHEREAS, The Checklist is a useful tool for the Planning Commission and the City Council to make informed decisions on annexation proposals; and, WHEREAS, The Checklist helps to prioritize annexations; and, , This Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, , notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, A public meeting was conducted on March 4, 1996, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to the March 18, 1996 meeting, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and, , A public meeting was conducted by City Council on April 9, 1996, at which time the City Council continued the item to the May 14, 1996 meeting, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; R:\STA 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 an 5 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMIECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THE FOLLONA'ING: Section 1.The approval of the Annexation Guidelines (Planning Application No. PA95-0125), including theAnnexation Guidelines Checklist and the Annexation Area Priority Map as set forth in Exhibits Aand B, respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The City Council authorizes the use of the Annexation Guidelines in evaluating requests for annexation. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOV= by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the 14th day of May, 1996. Karel Lindemans, Mayor ATMT: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, JuneS. Greek, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No.was duly adopted b-,, the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held onthe 14th day of May, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\grAFFRP'nl25PA95.CC 5/6/96 6 EXHIBIT A THE ANNEXATION GUI]DEL@ CHECKLIST R:\STAFFRP'nl25PA95.CC 5/6/96 an 7 ANNEXATION GUIDELINM CHECKLIST GENERAL EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO THE CITY 1. The applicant/owner is wilting to enter into a The Agreement empowers the city to make revisions to the entitlements and Conditions of Development/Anriexation Agreement Approval for approved projects. Furthermore, allows the City to obtain a Development/Annexation Agreement fee from the developer. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Annexation By establishing a priority map the City establishes a pattern to follow for fumm amexations. Pnot ity Map or the proposal makes the City closer to other properties that the City desires to annex. Growth Managenwnt Policy 2.6. 1 1 1 1 'The City agrees to Fast Track proposed annexation projects and waive all application sing fees to encourage the developers/owners to nKAify the approved plans aM enter into Development/Annexation Agreements. R:\STA 125P Q'i (C 5/6/96 f3 INFRAS EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO THE CITY 3. An @tructure F@cing Plan aM a Phasing The adequacy, @ing, and f@ing methods of all utilities and public facilities am Plan is submitted by the applicant. Growth addressed and ensured through the Infrastructure Firiancing Plan and the Phasing Plan.' Management Policy 2.2, 2.6, 6 3, @ Use Policy 7.1. 4. The proposal will result in constniction of an The City's critical infrastructure links are built without expenditures from the General Fund. infi-astructure @ that is desired by the City to complete the existing system. 5. The proposal is within a proposed or existing The applicant has demonstrated to the City, through an independent audit of the Assessment Assessment District that is financially solvent. District, that the proposed improvements could be built with reasonable tax burdens on the Growth Managemera Policy 2. Z existing and/or future property owners. 6. The proposal is an existing development with fully Re.ide.itiai i,tojecto will Uf tile 9PI.L.-tif. improved infrastructure that complies with City (gFesf)) thiongh 9FeSf) Vaae5b.nentS %ViliC!. cati o.iiy iiiclttde !Ile eiViCe. Cti..e..tiy provided standards. by the e....t, @en (esA). At the auL@ there, tity do iiat iticxenv the d.,L@ un lie" Be. Vice. nixice ttxe.e iftide..ts timy ati@ be t?@h.r, eity faliiiti.. au@i. .. Mik% Mmi t..ii.. it It is the policy of the City Council not to be responsible for the high cost of maintaining dirt roads, unimproved flood control channels, and other infrastructure that does not meea City standards. R:@TAP 125PA95.CC 516/% FISCAL EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO TIIE CITY 7. The proposal, if it includes industrial an&or office The project wiH provide additional employment to the T residents. designated areas, aM will bring high quality employment opportunities to the residents of Temecula. Growth Managenwnt Policy 2.5. 8. The proposal, at buildout, will have an overall The City and the TCSD will continue to have a balanced budget and be able to provide a fiffl positive fi" impact on the City and the TCSD range of services to the existing aM @re residents. budget as determined by the General Plan Fiscal Model. Land Use Policy 7 2, Economic Developnwnt Implenwntation Measure No. 6 Fiscal Viability. 9. The project, at buildout has a negative fimmial The City would not have to use additional resources from the General Fund or the TCSD impact and the applicant/owner agrees @gh a budget to support on-going operating expenses for the additional municipal services required Development/Annexation Agreement to fully mitigate by the project. Since ffi"e operating expenses am on-going, the Development/Annexation the cost of providing municipal services (on-going Agreement should s@ the number of years that dme expenses are to be calculated. operating costs) ". Ecorwmic Deveh)pnwnt Implementation Measure No. 6 Fisral Viability. 10. @ project, at buildout, has a negative financial The City would not have to use additional resources from the General Fund to support capital impact and the applicant/owner agrees through a expenditures for the additional municipal services required by the project. Development/Annexation Agreement to fully mitigate the cost of providing municipal services (capital costs) ','. Economic Devek-pnwnt Implerwntation Measure No. 6 Fiscal Viability. I @ City agrees to Fast Track proposed annexation projects and waive all processing application fees to encourage the deveiopers/owners to uiodify die approved plans and enter into Developnient/Annex&6on Agrftimnts. "Me on-going operating expenses are calculated by the cost to provide services for the project less the income produced from property taxes when the project is ultimately developed. 'Mese services include but are not limited to police, fire, library, parks and recreation, planning, building i@tions, and street nuintenance, 'Me on-going operating expenses need to be calculated for a number ofyeam @ified by the City and need to be converted to a per unit fee for residential projects or to a per acre fee for commercial and industrial projects. The resulting fee @ll be paid to dke City through a Developnient/Annexation @unit fee or another mechanism acceptable to the City. ' Specific capital impacts on services such as police, fire, library, parks and recreation, planning, building inv"tions, street maintenance, etc. have been analyzed by the City. 'Me City has eambliabod a Development Impact Fee for all development proposals which mitigates @st impacts. Each annexation proposal is responsible for 100% of die DevelopnbeFt h"cl Fee that offsets the capital costs associated with dw p@t - with no subsidy from the City, as it nmy be provided to projects within the City Uniit. This fee shall be paid to the City through a Developnicofi/Anncxation @nient fee or another mocharism acceptable to the City. R:\STA 125PA95.CC 5/6/% an 1 0 LAI @E EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO THE CITY I 1. The proposal will not cause leapfrog develornnent Higher quality of development could result since the resources used to extend infrastructure and inefficient service extensions. @ Use Policy &M provide services to remote areas can be used to provide more ain@ties for the residents Z 1, Z 3 (4), Growth Management Policy 2.2, 2.6, of the development or the City. Reduces subsidies to speculative @ development and the 2. Z use for assessment districts for infrastructure extensions. 12. The proposal has no approved @ use The City will have total control over the design of the project, can ensure its compatibility entitlements. with the General Plan, and can impose appropriate Conditions of Approval on the project. 13. The proposal has approved entitlements and is The City has the ability to review and make appropriate revisions to the approved willing to enter into a DeveloMwnt/Annexation entitlements @or the Conditions of Approval to ensure consistency with the Goals and Agreement. Policies of the General Plan. (Mese entitlements include but are not limited to Specific Plans, Environmental finpact Reports, Development Plans, and Tentative Maps.) 14. nw project provides significant open space The City can ensure preservation of regionally and locally significant open space areas opportunities that the City desires to designate as through land use review. permanent open Space 4. @ Use Policy 8.2, Open SpacelConservation Policy 1.6, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.7, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.8, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12. 15. The project is compatible with the surrounding The residents of the City will benefit from compatible kM uses. land uses. Land Use Policy 7 1, Z 3, 8. 1. 16. The proposal includes a Village Center as defined The project supports one of the General Plan's most important goals, the creation of Village in the General Plan. Growth Management Policy 2.4. Centers. 17. The proposal includes a unique and innovative The City gains a project which provides a superior alternative to the conventional urban physicaj design. @ Use Policy 7 3, Open design. SpacelConservation Policy 5.3. agencies need to be assigned to ensure the proper management and preservation of the resources. AR necessary information @sary for staff to make informed decisions about the open space such as biological, hydrological, etc. studies shall be fiu-nished by the applicant. R:\STA 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 on 1 1 PARKS AND RECREATION EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO THE CITY 18. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the residential portion of the proposal proposes 5 Ensures that all park land dedication requirements within the acres of park land for every 1000 people generated from the project. Open annexation area are consistent with City Standards. The project SpacelCortservation Policy 1.3., Parks and Recre@ Master PlanIFunding and provides its fair share of park improvements. LaM Acquisition, Section 5. 19. Depending upon the size of the proposal, between 30% to 50% of the required Ensures that the park dedication have been parks within the entire specific plan are planned be constructed and dedicated to the satisfied by the responsible developer(s) and accepted by the City prior to 25% of the building permits allowable for the project. City l@ti-,r to completion of the project. In addition, a phasing plan for park development prioritizes the recreational needs of 20. The balance of all park requirements are planned to be constructed and the residents and establishes an orderly process of future park dedicated to the City prior (4) 75 % of the building permits allowable for the project.development to keep pace with the growing population of the city. 21. All parks @iH be are proposed as tum-key facilities, completely developed by Empowers the TCSD to oversee the planning and development the Developer. The City has ngreed to the design and the acreage for each City of the required public park facilities and ensures ffid dw park parksite,ParkandRecreationMasterPlanILandAcqif@ :.@*t,Section5.titiproventents are provided co with the housing development. 22. AU bilm and trail improvements are proposed purs@ to the Parks and A bike I;ine and trail network within the City provides lbr a Recreation Master Plan and approved by the Director of Community Services. multitude of recreational opportunities and encourages the use Open Spacel Consermhon Policy 1. 10, Parks and Recreation Master of alternate non-niotorized transportation rmites. PkWFacilities Improvenwnts, Sectiori 23. All residential developments ... a.t hme include a Homeowners Association The TCSD has established standards for the and (HOA) to maintain interior slopes and open space areas that will not be dedicated to long-term nwint of pe @caping. The the city. Agreement will ensure that these s s are upheld and that 11OAs ore, established to @@ areas not accepted into the City's landscape maintenance pr-ognim. 24. The fi" analysis concludes that the proposal does not significantly increase 'nw existing residents of the City wiU not be burdened with the TCSD rates and charges for dw existing property owners within the City, Park significantly higher fees as a result of the prop,@,fil. nw 'RCSD and Recreation Master P@Funding Stmtegy, Secnm 5. @ and charges are based on a and formula which fairly distributes each service level budget @ng all non- exempt parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each @l. R:WAFF@125PA95.CC 5/6/96 on 1 2 PARKS AND LEATION EVALUATION CRITERIA YES NO N/A BENEFITS TO THE CITY 25. The proposal is an existing residential development. E@ng residential projects will inc the revenue of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) through TCSD assessments which can only include the se@ currently provided by the County Service Area (CSA). At the same time, they do not increase the demand on new services since these residents may Wmdy be using City facilities such as parks and trails. R:\STAFFRM12SPA95.CC 5/6/% on 1 3 Exhibit B ANNEXATION PRIORITY MAP R:\ST 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 an 1 4 ANNEXATION PRIORITY MAP ............................ Sphere of Influence Enviro=ental Study Area HIGH MEDIUM LOW City of Temecula Sphere of Influence h e C i t y o f FEMECULA @ON THE PLANNlt4G- General Plan Pro _g r a m ATTAC NO.2 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 4, 1996 R:\STA l@PA95.CC 516/96 sn 1 5 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 4, 1996 Planning Application No. 95-0125 Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION:The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1 .ADOPT Resolution No. recommending approval of PA95-01 25, the Cit@s n@nexation Guidelines Checklist, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. BACKGROUND To discuss the proposed Annexation Guidelines, the Planning Commission held a Workshop on February 5, 1996. This Workshop was a result of City Council direction to prepare guidelines to evaluate annexation proposals. At this Workshop, the Commission provided direction to staff on a number of issues which are addressed in this Staff Report. Annexation projects individually and cumulatively could have a great impact on the City in terms of future population of the City and the required municipal services needed for these projects. The intent of the Annexation Guidelines is to allow the Planning Commission and the City Council to make informed decisions on annexation requests. These Guidelines will enable the Planning Commission and the City Council to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of annexation requests and to make decisions that are consistent with the General Plan and in the best interest of the City. These guidelines are based on the General Plan's Annexation Goals and Policies. DISCUSSION This section provides an analysis of the issues discussed by the Commission. These issues included: 1 . The role of the Priority Map (Criteria No. 2). 2.Projects that are subject to the High Quality Employment Opportunities (Criteria No. 7). 3.Projects that are within Assessment Districts (Criteria No.5). 4.Development Agreement fees (Criteria No. 1). 5. The relationship between the proposed Guidelines and the General Plan. R:ISTAF PC 2ng/96 vgw Priority Map Due to the Commission's concerns, staff has re-evaluated the Priority Map introduced at the workshop. The Commission directed staff to provide an alternative to the previously proposed Annexation Priority Map. Several options were discussed. One alternative consisted of a map identifying the different sections of the Sphere without identifying the priorities among them. Another alternative was to identify the different sections of the Sphere of Influence and prioritize them as high, medium, and low. The General Plan Growth Management Element includes a policy which encourages setting priorities for growth areas (Policy 2.6). In staff's opinion, if the Commission and Council want to pro-actively influence the future development of the Sphere of Influence, the City needs to prioritize the annexation areas. The advantage of taking a pro-active role is that it can help to increase the control of our Sphere of Influence. One of the disadvantages of pro-active annexation is the potential for negative short-term fiscal impact on the City. Another drawback is that many property owners may not wish to become part of the City. The Commission also asked whether the Priority Map controlled the Checklist. The Priority Map is a part of the Checklist and does not override the Checklist. If a project is consistent with the Annexation Priority Map, it simply receives a 'Yes'; if it is not, it receives a 'No". Just like all the other criteria in the Checklist, a 'No' in this column does not automatically stop the City from further analyzing the annexation proposal. The new Priority Map includes three categories of high, medium, and low priority (refer to Attachment 7). In order to establish the priority areas for the annexation areas, staff referred back to the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that it is the City's desire to annex areas prior to, or concurrent with, project approvals in order to exercise control over the use, quality and design of development, as well as ensure the adequacy of public facilities and amenities (Goal No. 7). Moreover, Policy No. 7.1 indicates that the City should annex lands to the City that can be developed in accordance with the General Plan and can be adequately served by public facilities and utility services. Therefore, the General Plan makes it clear that the high priority areas for annexation should be those areas with no entitlements. At this time, these areas include the Johnson Ranch and Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plans, some areas within the French Valley Area, the escarpment area to the west of the City Limits, and the Rainbow Canyon and Pechanga Creek areas to the southwest of the City Limits. Staff then recommends that the Redhawk, Vail Ranch, Silverhawk, Rancho Bella Vista, and the French Valley Specific Plans become the medium priority areas. The rest of French Valley would then become the low priority areas. Promects with High Quality Employment Opportunities The Commission had concerns with the term 'significant high quality emoloyment' in Criteria No. 7. Staff's intent with this criteria was to differentiate between projects that provide high paying professional jobs associated with industrial and corporate parks and the entry level jobs associated with neighborhood commercial retail projects. Staff is recommending a minor change that would make this criteria a better tool to evaluate annexation proposals. Therefore, the following language is recommended to replace the original proposal with the added phrase shown in bold: The proposal includes industrial and/or office designated areas and will bring high quality employment opportunities to the residents of Temecula. R:\ST PC 2ngl% vgw 2 This modification eliminates a negative mark for projects that are primarily residential with limited retail development. Such proposals would receive an N/A for this criteria. Proiects with Assessment Districts The Commission directed staff to combine two criteria that dealt with assessment districts. The Commission felt that as long as Assessment Districts were financially solvent, they were not undesirable. Staff agrees with the Commission and is proposing Criteria No. 5 with the following language: The proposal is within a proposed or existing Assessment District that is financially solvent. Development Agreement Fees The Commission expressed concern regarding Criteria No. 1. This criteria states the willingness of the developer/owner to enter into a Development Agreement. One of the benefits of entering into a Development Agreement for the City is the ability to obtain Development Agreement fees from the developer. The Commission had a question regarding this fee and the difference between Development Impact and Development Agreement fees. There are generally two types of fiscal impacts to the City: capital cost impacts and operating cost impacts. Development Impact fees relate to mitigating the direct capital cost impacts of the project. Capital costs relate to the expense of constructing fire stations, police stations, libraries , and purchasing fire trucks, patrol cars (refer to Criteria No. 1 0). Operating costs refer to the cost to operate a fire station, police station, or library. These cost include salaries, supplies, utilities, etc (refer to Criteria No. 9). The only mechanism to offset operating cost impacts associated with new development projects is to enter into a Development Agreement and collect a Development Agreement fee. Furthermore, a Development Agreement fee can also be collected by the City simply in exchange for giving the developer entitlements for a certain amount of time as specified in the Development Agreement. For existing developments, City-wide assessments are the only way to mitigate the operating cost impacts. It should be mentioned that new assessments would have to be approved through an election before they can be imposed by the City if the residents are not currently paying for these services. The Relationship between the Goals and Policies of the General Plan and the Annexation Checklist The Commission was concerned about the relationship between the Checklist and General Plan. The Checklist was developed using the General Plan Goals and Policies which are included in Attachment No. 3. Staff has referenced each criteria in the checklist with the policy numbers from the applicable General Plan Element to show the relationship of each criteria to the General Plan. These references appear at the end of each criteria and are shown in italics. While the checklist may include some criteria not specifically referenced in the General Plan, the additional criteria complement the stated goals of the General Plan. The Checklist has been designed to implement the General Plan. R:KSTA PC 2ngt% vgw 3 CONCLUSION By law, the City is not required to annex any land within the Sphere of Influence; therefore, annexations become policy decisions for the City Council. In staff's opinion, if long term control of the Sphere of Influence is desired, the City should take a pro-active role in annexations. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project does not require an environmental analysis since it is not considered a project pursuant to Section 21065 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Attachments: 1 . PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 2.The Annexation Guidelines Checklist - Blue Page 15 3.General Plan Goals and Policies Regarding Annexations - Blue Page 22 4.The Steps in the Annexation Process - Blue Page 31 5.Specific Plans within the Sphere of Influence - Blue Page 38 6.Planning Commission Workshop Staff Report, February 5, 1996 - Blue Page 39 7. Priority Map - Blue Page 40 R:\,STA PC 2128196 vgw 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96- R:\ST PC 2n8/96 vgw 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION 96- FOR ADOPTION OF THE ANNEXATION GUIDELINES CHECKLIST. WHEREAS, State Planning and Zoning Law requires a City to adopt a General Plan; and, WHEREAS, State Planning and Zoning Law states that a local General Plan may contain issues the local government deems necessary and appropriate to address local concerns; and, WHEREAS, The City adopted its General Plan on November 9, 1993; and, WHEREAS, The General Plan contains numerous policies on the subject of annexation; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Annexation Guidelines Checklist is consistent with the adopted General Plan for the City ; and, WHEREAS, This Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, A public meeting was conducted on March 4, 1996, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0125 ( The City's Annexation Guidelines Checklist), makes the following findings, to wit: 1 . The Checklist implements the General Plan and its policies. 2. The Checklist is a useful tool for the Planning Commission and the City Council to make informed decisions on annexation proposals. R:%STAF PC 2n&l% vgw 6 3.The Checklist summarizes the fiscal impacts of annexation proposals. 4.The Checklist implements the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 5. The Checklist helps to prioritize annexations. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1996. CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of March, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: DEBBIE UBNOSKE SECRETARY R:%STAFFRPT\ANNEX.PC 2ngl% vgw 7 ATTAC NO.3 Planning Commission Workshop Staff Report Dated February 5, 1996 R:\STA 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 sn 1 6 MEMORANDUM TO:Planning Commission FROM:Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager DATE:February 5, 1996 SUBJECT:A Workshop on Annexation Guidelines Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff on the proposed Annexation Guidelines. BACKGROUND The City Council has directed staff to prepare guidelines to evaluate annexation proposals. The need for these guidelines is the result of the complex issues involving a number of large annexation proposals such as Johnson Ranch, Roripaugh Ranch, and Silverhawk (Pulte Homes). These projects individually and cumulatively could have a great impact on the City in terms of future population of the City and the required municipal services needed for these projects. Staff contacted other Cities to learn how other local governments reviewed annexation proposals. However, staff has found that no other City in California has adopted detailed annexation guidelines. As a result, the task of creating these guidelines has proved to be very challenging. On one hand, the guidelines need to be specific and rigid to allow careful considerations of annexation proposals, but on the other hand, the guidelines need to be general and flexible to allow them to be used for different types of annexation proposals. The intent of the Annexation Guidelines is to allow the Planning Commission and the City Council to make informed decisions on annexation requests. These guidelines will enable the Planning Commission and the City Council to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of annexation requests, to make decisions that are consistent with the General Plan and are in the best interest of the City. These guidelines are based on the General Plan's annexation Goals and Policies which are included as Attachment 2. In order to provide a better understanding of the annexation process Attachment 3 has been included for the Commission's information. In addition, the following provides answers to a few annexation questions. R:\STA ODL 2n&l% m 1 DISCUSSION What is an annexation? Annexation is the process of adding new land area into an existing city or special district, such as the Temecula Community Services District, with a resulting change in the boundaries of that local agency. Are theme different types of annexations? Yes, there are two types of annexations: 0Uninhabited annexations (1 1 or less registered voters residing within the annexation territory) 0Inhabited annexations (1 2 or more registered voters residing within the annexation territory) Who can initiate annexations? A proposal for annexation of territory to a city is initiated by application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) either by a Resolution of Application adopted by the City Council for City initiated annexations or a petition signed by either of the following for property owner initiated annexations: 0Not less than 5 percent of the number of registered voters residing within the territory proposed to be annexed as shown on the County Register of Voters; 0Not less than 5 percent of the number of owners of land within the territory proposed to be annexed who also own 5 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory as show on the last equalized roll. Prior to the adoption of an annexation resolution, the City Council must conduct a noticed public hearing. Notice of the public hearing must be published at least 1 5 days prior to the date of the hearing. Does the state law regulate annexations? Yes, the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, revised 1989, Go,vernment Code Section, 56000et. sea. , established regulations for annexations and other reorganizations. This Act is essentially pro-annexatic @- and generally limits the City's role in the process to that of a 'Conducting Authority" to hear and count protests to the annexation from the residents and the property owners in the territory proposed to be annexed. R:\ST GDL 2n&l% mm 2 Can the City stop unwanted annexation [)ror)osals? Yes, once the City has decided that an annexation project is not in the best interest of the City, unwanted annexations may be stopped in two ways. The most legally defensible manner to stop an annexation is by rescinding the adopted Master Property Tax Agreement with the County. This Agreement allows all annexations to take place by identifying the portion of the property tax that the City would receive from the County on all annexations. A Property Tax Agreement is required by LAFCO prior to deeming the annexation application complete. LAFCO cannot proceed with the annexation process when the application is not deemed complete. Without the Master Property Tax Agreement, the City would not be able to annex properties to the City. In order for the City to approve future annexation proposals, an Individual Property Tax Agreement or a Master Property Tax Agreement needs to be renegotiated with the County. There are advantages and disadvantages associated with rescinding the City's existing Master Property Tax Agreement. The biggest advantage is that the City would be in a strong position if the City were opposed to an annexation proposal, since LAFCO cannot approve an annexation without a Property Tax Agreement. The disadvantages are that the City would have to negotiate a separate Property Tax Agreement for each individual annexation proposal with the County or adopt a Master Property Tax Agreement. This could be a very time consuming process and, as a result, the City could lose the applicant's interest to annex to the City. Another disadvantage is that the County may ask for more concessions from the City in order to agree to future tax agreements with the City. These concessions could include a bigger share of the property tax for the County and a share of other taxes collected by the City after the annexation such as sales tax. The second method the City can use to stop an annexation is by not approving the Plan of Services or the Pre-Zoning Ordinance, both of which are required by LAFCO before the annexation application is deemed complete. LAFCO would not be able to proceed with the annexation process if the application is deemed incomplete. There is no case law on this issue. However, it is the City Attorney's opinion that this may not be the best legally defensible approach to stop annexations because a court could order the City to prepare a Plan of Services or to pre-zone the property, or allow the applicant to prepare and submit the Plan of Services. How does the Annexation Guidelines Checklist work? The proposed guidelines have been prepared in a checklist format to allow a quick review of the benefits and drawbacks of any proposed annexation (refer to Attachment 1). Several categories of criteria have been created which appear at the top of each table. The categories include: 0General 0Infrastructure 0Fiscal 0 Land Use R:%STAF GDL 2t28/96 an 0 Parks and Recreation Each table contains several criteria followed by the possible benefit(s) of each to the City. For each new annexation proposal, staff would complete the tables with check marks in appropriate spaces. A project with many 'Yes"es could be a good candidate for annexation, on the other hand, a project with many "No"s is perhaps not a very good candidate for annexation. It should be noted that each criteria has a different weight and more 'Yes"es than "No's does not necessarily mean that the project should be annexed to the City. If a criteria does not apply to a particular project, the N/A box will be checked. Staff also recommends against a scoring system that assigns scores for different criteria. While this approach may appear to be objective, it can provide highly subjective or misleading results. CONCLUSION Staff is proposing the adoption of the Annexation Guidelines Checklist. We feel this approach is both comprehensive in scope and provides appropriate flexibility. Attachments: 1 . Annexation Guidelines Checklist and the Annexation Priority Map - Blue Page 5 2.General Plan Goals and Policies Regarding Annexations - Blue Page 1 1 3. The Steps in the Annexation Process - Blue Page 16 R:Wr GDL 2ngl% m 4 ATTAC NO. 4 GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIIES REGARDING ANNEXATION R:\STAF 125PA95.CC 5/6/96 sn 1 7 Does the General Plan contain annexation aoals and E)olicies? Yes. The General Plan states that: 1 .The General Plan Study Area includes some 34 square miles of unincorporated territory. Within this area, are approximately nine proposed specific plans, that when developed, will have a direct impact on the City in terms of traffic, noise, the demand for community facilities, the demand for employment and commercial activities,and other impacts. 2.It is the City's desire to annex areas within the Sphere of Influence prior to or concurrent with project approvals, in order to exercise control over the use, quality and design of development, as well as ensure the adequacy of public facilities and amenities. 3.The City intends to utilize the General Plan to review development and annexation proposals within these unincorporated areas. 4.The City shall adopt procedures governing the prezoning of areas to be annexed to the City. These procedures shall be included in the Development Code. Criteria for prezoning shall consider existing land uses, if any, on the site to be annexed; existing County zoning on the site and surrounding area; existing circulation patterns; and environmental conditions on the site and surrounding area. Prezoning is subject to the same requirements applicable to zoning in the City including the requirement for consistency with the General Plan. 5.The City has a great opportunity to shape the open spaces of development annexing to the City. The challenge facing Temecula is to create a multipurpose open space system that does not sol, consist of the unusable spaces leftover from development, but maintains viable agriculture land,, outside the City, preserves wildlife habitats, maximizes water resources, and secures recreational, historic and cultural resources. The City will benefit from connection with the open spaces ensured through ownership by federal and state government, such as the Cleveland National Forest, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the California State University at San Diego. 6.Fiscal Viability of projects need to be verified by: a.Requiring new development to pay for its share of capital and operating costs not met by General Fund revenues generated directly by the project. b.Utilizing the comprehensive fiscal impact model on an ongoing basis to monitor both General Fund and Community Service District Fund fiscal impacts as development information becomes available. C.Formulating land use mitigation strategies for projected deficits to incorporate a balance of land uses that will provide sufficient revenue to cover new costs. d.Defining financing techniques that will assist in funding recurring costs in addition to funding one-time capital improvements, allocating the impacts equitably between new and existing development. R:IST GDL 2ngl% an 12 e.Evaluating fiscal impacts of future annexations on an ongoing basis. f. Evaluating long-term effects of proposed City sales tax rebates to large retailers. Further, the General Plan provides the following specific Goals and Policies that relate to annexations: Goal 7 of the Land Use Element Orderly annexation and development of unincorporated areas within Temecula's Sphere of Influence. Discussion The unincorporated area in the City's northern Sphere of Influence is largely proposed for development through specific plans. The City has an opportunity to control land use, phasing of development, project design, and infrastructure improvements by annexing these properties prior to approval by Riverside County. The intent is to ensure that future annexations are a beneficial addition to the City. 7.1 Policy Annex lands to the City that can be developed in accordance with the General Plan and can be adequately served by public facilities and utility services. 7.2 Policy Require proposed annexations to be evaluated using the City's Fiscal Impact Model and Traffic Impact Model. 7.3 Policy Evaluate the land use pattern and intensity/density of proposed annexations in terms of: 1 . The Village Centers designations on the Land Use Plan. 2.The linkage of open space and trails to adjacent developments. 3.The compatibility of the annexation to adjacent uses in the City. 4.The demonstrated need for additional housing, industrial, commercial and other uses. Goal 8 of the Land Use Element A City which is compatible and coordinated with regional land use patterns. Discussion Temecula is a leader in the region in terms of its commercial uses, job base, and quality of residential development. The land use decisions the City makes will have direct and indirect impacts on surrounding communities (and visa versa). Through inter-governmental coordination, the City can properly address regional land use issues to achieve a coordinated regional land use pattern. The Growth Management Element contains more specific policies related to regional coordination and growth management. R:%STAF GDL 2ngl% an 13 8.1 Policy Provide a pattern of land uses that maintain and enhance the viability of neighboring communities including the City of Murrieta, and the counties of Riverside and San Diego, througn compatible uses and linkages. 8.2 Policy Provide a system of open space that is coordinated with regional open space uses to comprehensively address the management and conservation resources. Goal 6 of the Growth Management Element A water and wastewater infrastructure system that supports existing and future development in the Study Area. DiscussionWater availability is a critical determinant in Southern California's future growth and development. By working closely with the Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District in developing supply options; conservation techniques, including the use of reclaimed water; and development monitoring systems, the City can ensure that development does not outpace the long-term availability of water. Close coordination with Eastern Municipal Water District in the timely expansion of wastewater treatment facilities is equally important to the community's well-being. 6.3 Policy Coordinate with the water and wastewater districts when considering General Plan amendments, annexations, or development agreements, in order to assist the districts in planning for adequate capacity to accommodate future growth. Goal 2 of the Growth Management Element Orderly and efficient patterns of growth within Temecula that enhance +,ne quality of life for residents. Discussion The Growth Management Strategy contained in the Growth Management Element is intended to be the framework for a future Growth Management Program (GMP). This GMP should be designed to influence adequacy of public faciii-@ I%s and services in relation to the location, phasing, type, quality and intensity of new development and redevelopment. It should also take into consideration the existing communities and resources of Temecula, the Sphere of Influence, and Environmental Study Area. All the policies of this Element, in essence, support this goal. 2.1 Policy Prepare and implement a Growth Management Program for Temecula. R:SSTAFFRPT\ANNIEDC.GDL 2ngl% 14 2.2 Policy Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occur in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. 2.3 Policy Establish and maintain level of service standards in order to document adequacy requirements. 2.4 Policy Encourage development of Village Centers, as defined in the Land Use and Community Design Elements to reduce public service costs and environmental impacts through compatible land use relationships, and efficient circulation and open space systems. 2.5 Policy Encourage new development that helps to create and maintain a balance between jobs and housing opportunities. 2.6 Policy Establish priority growth areas within the City and Sphere of Influence where near-term urbanization will be encouraged. 2.7 Policy Discourage the use of assessment districts that promote urban sprawl and premature urbanization in rural and agricultural areas. 2.8 Policy Coordinate the Growth Management Program with the Congestion Management Program as necessary. Goal 7 ofthe Growth Management Element An effective, safe and environmentally compatible flood control system. Discussion As urbanization increases, so does the potential for disruption caused by flooding and inadequate flood control facilities. Local and regional flood control facilities need to be comprehensively planned to protect existing areas and future development from flood hazards. As urban and suburban development increases, runoff increases by replacing permeable surfaces with pavement and structures. The potential of overloading existing drainage facilities is a concern that must be addressed comprehensively in the Study Area. 7.3 Policy Develop master drainage plans, when appropriate, for the Sphere of Influence, in conjunction with the Flood Control District. R:\STAFF GDL 2n8/96 on 15 ITEI\4 29 APPROVAL CITY AT FINANCE CITY MA CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Ordinance 96- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN DIAZ ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD BACKGROUND: Rancho California Road from Diaz Road to Front Street and from Ynez Road to Moraga Road is a four (4) lane divided roadway. The segment between Front Street and Ynez Road is designated as a Six (6) Lane Divided Urban Arterial on the City of Temecula Circulation Element of the General Plan. This segment of Rancho California Road encompasses the Interstate 15 interchange as well as other major intersections such as Ynez Road and Front Street. Currently, the posted speed limit along this segment of Rancho California Road is 40 MPH. The 40 MPH speed limit was established per a traffic and engineering survey conducted on February 4, 1991. Section 408030 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, a traffic and engineering survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period. Essentially, a traffic and engineering survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. To comply with the CVC requirements, the Traffic Division has conducted a traffic and engineering survey on Rancho California Road between Diaz Road and Moraga Road. Based on analysis of this data, staff recommends a 5 MPH reduction in the speed limit from the existing 40 MPH to 35 MPH. The reduction in the posted speed limit is due to a lower 85th percentile speed as measured in the field. r:\agdrpt\96\0514\spdpdiaz.ord/ajp At the April 25, 1996 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission reviewed the proposed speed limit reduction and recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code to establish a new 35 MPH speed limit on Rancho California Road between Diaz Road and Moraga Road. The Commision discussed this item briefly and there were no public comments. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Signs Account No. 100-1 64-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 100-164-601-5410. 4 new speed limit signs, and legends @ $150 $600 Remove existing legend, 64 S.F. @ $2.00 S.F. $la TOTAL $728 ATTACHMENTS@ 1.Ordinance 96- 2.Exhibit 'A', Location Map 3.Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Speed Zoning -2- r:\agdrpt\96\0514\spdpdiaz.ord/ajp ORDINANCE 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE LA MUNICEPAL CODE REGARDING THE P FACIEE SPEED LEffr ON RANCHO CALUORNIA ROAD BETWEEN DL4Z ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD THE CITY COUNC]IL OF THE CrrY OF TEMECULA DOES BY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street an!d Declared Pd= Portion Affected Facie S@ Limit. Miles Per Hour Rancho California Road between 35 Diaz Road and Moraga Road Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective D=. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. -3- r:\agdipt\96\0514\spdpdiaz.ord/ajp PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPT'ED this day of 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor A T: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ]]DE Ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby ce@ that the foregoing Ordinance No. 96- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of May, 1996, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the @'8th day of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCIILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNC]ILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\agdrpt\96\0514\spdpdiaz.ord/ajp s@ C:R 2P@ZO BRIL 3P@ PtA'rO DEL SOL 4@, " FUE:O 5 cc@ F@ CT SURVEY LOCATION EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION NLKP CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY FOR SPEED ZONING Jurisdiction:CITY OF TEMECULA LOCATION Rancho California Road between Diaz Road and Moraaa go@ Existing Posted Speed Limit: 40 mi2h Date of Survey: 04/15196 Critical Speed (85th percentile): 39.3 mph Median Speed: 35 mph 10 mph Pace Range: 27 throuah 36 mph ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW Number of Accidents: 24 speed related accidents Accident Period: 12 Months xDoes not warrant a speed limit more than 5 mph below the critical speed. Warrants a speed limit more than 5 mph below the critical speed. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS Warrants a speed limi- less than the critical speed because of unusual conditions nL,. readily apparent to the motorist. Unusual conditions: None RADAR ENFORCEMENT SPEED LIMIT This Traffic and Engineering Survey indicates that the appropriate speec limit for Rancho California Road between D'az Road and Moraaa @ is @ mph. CER TIFICA TION 1, Martin C. Lauber, declare: That I am emr!-)Yed by the City of Temecula, 431 74 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 925z-: , - as Traffic Engineer. That the attached Traffic and Engineering Survey was prepared for the City of Temecula and is a true copy of the Traffic and Engineering Survey presented to the City Clerk for their files. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Temecula, California on this day of m P"y beci@rant r:/forms/tmfric/survcy6.so I ITEI\4 3 0 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN FINANCE DIRE CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 14, 1996 SUBJECT: Ordinance 96- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer@ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BACKGROUND: Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and Solana Way is designated as a Four (4) Lane Divided Arterial on the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The speed limit along this segment of Margarita Road is currently posted at 45 MPH. The 45 MPH speed limit was established per a traffic and engineering survey conducted on February 6, 1991. Section 408030 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, a traffic and engineering survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period. A traffic and engineering survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds, accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. To comply with the CVC requirements, the Traffic Division has conducted a traffic and engineering survey on Margarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road. Based on analysis of this data, staff recommends that the existing 45 MPH speed limit remain the same and be reaffirmed by the City Council. At the March 28, 1996 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, the Commission received public testimony regarding the speed of vehicles on Margarita Road near Ramsey Court. A resident who lives in the vicinity, stated that motorists are using Margarita Road to go from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Moraga Road. This resident also stated that the narrow portion of Margarita Road adjacent to the future park site is unsafe as a pedestrian path. Staff -I- r:\agdrpt\96\0514\spdpmarga.ord/ajp informed the Commission that as part of the pavement rehabilitation project, striping on Margarita Road in this area has been modified to improve the pedestrian safety. Staff also indicated that as part of the future park improvements, Margarita Road will be widened with full public Improvements. At the conclusion of this item, the Commission recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code to reaffirm the existing speed limit on Margarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTSE 1.Ordinance 96- 2.EXHIBIT "A", Location Map 3.Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Speed Zoning -2- r:\agdrpt\96\05 14\spdpnurga.ord/ajp ORDINANCE 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE CULA MUNICIEPAL CODE REGARDING TUE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LMn ON MARGARITA ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND RANCHO CALIMRNIA ROAD THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CrrY OF TEMEECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: AS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. WHEREAS, the City conducts traffic and engineering surveys on its roadways in order to determine the appropriate speed limit; , the @c and engineering survey on the segment of roadway designated in this Ordinance indicates that the speed limit should remain the same and, therefore, the intent of the Council is to reaffirm the speed limit given the new traffic and engineering study. SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets: "Name of Street and Declared P ' Portion Affected Facie S@ Limit, Miles Per Hm Margarita Road between 45 Solana Way and Rancho California Road Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section 10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect. SECTTON 2. Severabflity. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall ce@ to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. -3- r:\agdrptk96\05 14\spdprrLarga.ord/ajp cr,CTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and -effect @ (30) days after its passage; and wi@ fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City CouncUmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED APPROVED AND ADO this - day of 1996. Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALUORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss CITY OFULA I, June S.Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby ce@ that the foregoing Ordinance No. 96- was dully lnbwuced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of May, 1996, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of May, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNC]ILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL ERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\agdrpt\%\0514\spdpmrga.ord/ajp E-X-HIBIT "A" LOCATIO-N A@P SURVEY LOCATION p@ Of GILWOOO OEL DE@000 CIR 2 @OOC, CIR XIOWA, CT AVO Cil L RO GU 1 SE13Y CIR AK 2 P@O BRIL co 3 PA-W RAYO OEL SOL RD 4 FIJE.0 5ccRTE F OR I RE)i@ ST 2 @l CT 3 CM( DR IL PRIUA@ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC DIVISION TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY FOR SPEED ZONING Jurisdiction:CITY OF TEMECULA LOCATION Maraarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road Existing Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph Date of Survey: 03114/96 Critical Speed (85th percentile): 49.3 mph Median Speed: 45 ml2h 10 mph Pace Range: 40 throuah 49 mph ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW Number of Accidents:Two (2) si2eed related accidents Accident Period:12 Months xDoes not warrant a speed limit more than 5 mph below the critical speed. Warrants a speed limit more than F mph below the critical speed. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS Warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed because of unusual conditions k readily apparent to the motorist. Unusual conditions: None RADAR ENFORCEMENT SPEED LIMIT This Traffic and Engineering Survey indicates that the appropriate speed limit for Margarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road is 45 mph. CER TIFICA TION 1, Martin C. Lauber, declare: That I am employed by the City of Temecula, 43174 Business @ark Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, as Traffic Engineer. That the attached Traffic and Engineering Survey was prepared for the City of Temecula and is a true copy of the Traffic and Engineering Survey presented to the City Clerk for their files. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Temecula, California on this. day of igi6. Decliirant r:/forms/tmffic/gurvey5.spd ITEM 31 APPROV CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINtN)t CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council/City Manager FROM:Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director, DATE:May 14,1996 SUBJECT:School Mitigation Fees Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council direct staff to schedule a joint City Council\School District meeting to discuss school mitigation fees. BACKGROUND The City has been working with the School District over the last several months to arrive at a school mitigation fee. At this time, the School District is ready to move forward with the development of a school mitigation fee. The School District and City staff met with a representative of the development community last week and Staff recommended that a joint meeting be scheduled between the District and the City. Available dates are as follows: May 21 st June 1 lth June 18th The School District is available to meet on any of the above dates after 3:00 p.m. A meeting place would need to be scheduled. FISCAL IMPACT N/A R:\FORMS\STAFFRPT.CC 516/96 kh ITEI\4 3 2 APPRO CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FIN@ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO:City Council FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE:May 14, 1996 SUBJECT:Acceptance of Easement for Future Trail (Pechanga Creek) PREPARED BY:@Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council: Direct staff to record the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate easement documents across the southerly portion of lots 32-34; 38-48; and lot 53 within Tract No. 1 9872-0 for purposes of securing a future recreational trail along Pechanga Creek. BACKGROUND: The conditions of approval fortheacacia Development require the developer to improve a multi-purpose trail along the north side of Pechanga Creek as part of the future subdivision improvements. However, because of erosion problems along the northerly section of Pechanga Creek, riprap and slope stabilization improvements were installed by Kaufman and Broad, the developer of residential homes directly to the north. As a result, the location of the multi-use trail had to be moved approximately 20' to the north, and now, is located within the Kaufman & Broad development. Therefore, the City now needs to secure offers to dedicate trail easements from several property owners for this future multi- use trail. By recording these documents, the City is only accepting an irrevocable offer from the property owners to dedicate an easement for use as a future trail and will not assume the maintenance of this area from the property owners until such time as the trail has been fully improved to City standards and accepted by the City Council. The trail improvements are required to be completed soley by the Acacia Development. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact at this time. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Copies of the Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate. 2.Vicinity Map. r:\yasinobic\k&bLrail.csd 051496 FLTTUTRE MLTLTI-PURPOSE R-ECREATIONAL TRAIL PECHA.NGA CREEK - - - --- - - - - -- No. 19872 - "K & B Z7 5q\ 53 Future Trs@ 'F-a@ent Pechanga Creek @AC 1. T Tentative Tract Map Vo. 252 /-7 - "A cr-@-ia vicinity @p Recorded at requ@t of and return to: Citv '-'Ierks Department Cltv of Temecula Dri@-e -F,mecula, CA- 92590 'P,ECOP DfNG: Parcel: 918-373-001 This instrument is for the benefit of the Cltv of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Prc)lect: Trac, 198-'- (Go-,,t. Code 6103). URREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE %,'_kLI 7 FOR A -BLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which's hereby aclcnowledoed, Steven R. Post ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), tocether with the risaht to further ,rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and riLJit-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational trail, including maintal,iin(-,, operation, alterin,,, repairing, and replacing -quipment and landscapin- over and within the boundaries of that certain real proT)erTv located in the Citv of Temecula. Countv of Riverside. more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refernce (the "Easement Area"). if G@NTEE, or its (yoverrimental entity, successors, or assigns, deterrru'nes it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to M' 'd Easement Area, in 'ntenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all in ntain sal ai covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, adnu'm'strators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. G@NTOR (-4 b,A f ED STATE OF CALIEFORNIA COUNTY OF iDE On before me, the undersigned, A Not@ Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared 4-J D p n y own me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfacto@vidence) to be the person(s) whose name(@i are subsc 'bed to the within instrument an d acknowledged n to me thav@e he/thev executed the same 1 er/their authorized capacity(les), and that b s er/their signature(s) on the instr@um@ent the person(s), or the entltv upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS mv hand and offic-d'al seal JANA L TCTAP s i LT n a t L, r CERTIFICATE OF ACC@PTANCE This is to certifv that the interest l@eal prope@conveyed by thewithin IrrevocaVe'Offer To Dedi/cate to the City/bf Temecula, a poiitacal corporation and/or covermn@tal acency/is hereby acce d by order of time City Council the date P/t.@ L)il" L@IC kJiLlilLC@ lisa@.riveroak,@od.frtn LIJ LIIC icL@iUaLikJil LIIICI- IL@ %-Lilly aLiLilUti/-CLi L),LIILCl. June S. Gr@@iiy Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 December 22, 1994 JN 400557-M30 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "Am LEGA@H- DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRATI LOT 32 OF TRACT NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated 4in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside. State of California, being that portion of Lot 32 of Tract No. 19872 as shown cn a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, included within a strip of land 10.00feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the southeasterly line of said Lot 32 distant thereon North 42'47'23" East 26.00 feet from the most southerly corner of said lot; thence North 52'03'00" West 66.23 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said Lot 32 distant thereon North 42'47'13' East 21-03 feet from the most westerly corner thereof. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate southeasterly in said southeasterly line and northwester'l-, in said northwesterly line. CONTAINING: 0.015 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT OBO attached and by this reference made a part hereof. No. 4547 iam L.-Green, [.S. 4547 -(E RU1005A 5T. TRACT NO. 19872 M,B. @-15 , 2,3-@7 w 5z PARCEL- M,AP NO. 11533 P.M.B. 6@/84-85 f ARC' -L I t4 4L'47'-L@ EXHIBIT '13- SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHF-GT MULTIPURPOSE Con 'Rqber?'7?eiq,'%Villiern 9%st 6&c54ssociates RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFES-,IONAL ENGINE@ RS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 2A-,-,SINGLEOAKDRIVF SUITEM-TEMIC.IA.CA-11. (714)676 901? - FAX (7141676 7240 DATE C A L E FI[IDBOOK JOB NO 12 -22-94 40' 400557 _ @io -- -:[ T-- SH C67 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer,,with the understanding that the City does not. at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r.\yuinobk\k&b@.cod 051496 Recorded at request of and return to: City C!-zr@--N i)epar-tment City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dri@,e T--necula, CA 92590 RECORDING Parcel- 918--,73-002 This instrument is for the benefit ot' the Ci@, of Temecula and is entitled to t-,e recorded without fee P.-Oject: Tr@ict 1987" (,Go,,-t. Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V--kLU.-\.BLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Rex J. Merrill and Patricia L- Merrill ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), to(yether with the rlc),ht to further !arant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational ing equipmen d within the trail, includin(, maintaining, operation, alterin-, repairinc,, and replac' t and landscaping over an boundaries of that certain real propertv located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, w@ch is incorporated herein by this refemce (the "Easement Area"). or its jovermnental entity, successors, or assi&zns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to 'd Easement Area, in 'ntenance shall, after notice, become the respoiis' 'I'ty of G@'NTOR, w' h all maintain sal ai ibi i it covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and beco@nc, obligations of all heirs, executors, adnu'ru'strators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. GRANTOR GRANTOR liATED DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On 11 - I re me, the und6@sign tary Public in and for the State of California, personally befo Fd, A No d o me (or proved to me on the basis of appeare [(I satisfactory evidence) to be the person(,s) whose n d to the within instrument 4n@knowledged to me t ecuted the same in his/h city(les), and that by his/hek/theils' nalure(s) g on the son(s), or the entity up f which the person(s) acted, executed the in ment. WITN seal. J. PerrQn S'tcynatiComm. 097.-:-5 PUSUC - D#E@ y EWres Dec. i S. i s96 CF-R@IFICATE OF ACCEPTA:-NCE v I @iis is to cei'lli-@ Interest in real, propertv colia eyed by the w'thin Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate t/o the C'ty of Temecula- a r)olltacal Corporation andtor Qove@ntal acency, is @reby accepted b@'order of the City/Council the date ,v and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its 3luly authorized Qfficer. June S. Greek, Citv CIO@rk lisa riveroak- iod.t'rm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 December 22, 1994 JN 400557-M31 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 33 OF TRA7T NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 33 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, included within a strip of land 10.00feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the southeasterly line of said Lot 33 distant thereon North 42'47'13" East 21.03 feet from the most southerly corner of said lot; thence North 52'03'00" West 8.89 feet; thence North 49'40'00" West 42.32 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said lot distant thereon North 46'00'00" East 18.94 feet from the most westerly corner thereof. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate southeasterly in said southeasterly line and northwesterly in said northwesterly line. CONTAINING: 0.012 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'Be attached and by this reference made a part hereof. illiam L.-GYeen, L.S . 4547 gulooSA SIT. T-P @@-T 0. I,;b),L M 2.1@ z@ - zl, ti 9toos" i Dow 43. @z' N 4&'OO'CV' E:- 16 11 4' F-@P-CEL MAF- WO. 1155- [-.M.@. 6,@/t4--6r, F'^F?-CEL EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET oF @,EF- r MULTIPURP03E @erT cBeirL, cwilliam 7Mst 6& Associates PROFEI-,SIONAL ENGlt4r=ERS. PLANNERS & SURVEYORS RECREATlOt4AL TRAIL- 287@5 SltlrLE OAK DRWE - SUITF 250 - TIMECLILA. CA 92390 (714)676 0042 - FAX 1714) 676 7240 [,/ITE Et D BOOK @jce No. 1,2 - ZZ - 94 4, " 1 400557 -M51 CERTIFICATE OF A:--CEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City conser . to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:\yaainobk\k&b@.csd 051496 at requ@t (irind return to: erk-@ ncn:i, t,,, @,, t Cltv of, Temecula T@-Tnectila, C.,), 92'-;90 -L L@CORDING@ Parcel- 91,@-,73-003 of the Cit-,@ ot'Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Project: Tract 1 987,1 ('Go@-t. Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V-ALU -KBLE CONSIDE@,kTION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Ronald R. Gancl, Carrie C. Gan,,], SallIUCI S. 'Uaill'i dild 'I-olanda V. Gan(yi ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the Cltv of Temecula ("Grantee"), to-ether with the ri2ht to further Lirant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rl-',it-of-wav for a multipurpose recreational trail, includin- maintaining, operation, alterin-, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of @verside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refernce (the "Easement Area"). If G@NTEE, or its oovernrnental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling, to 'dEasement Area, in 'ntenance shall, after notice, become the respons'b' ty of GRANTOR, with all maintain sal ai I ih covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, adnu'ni ators, successors and assians of the GRANTOR. '@TOR GRANTOR z- I?@- - DATED STATE OF CALIEFOP-NIA COUNTY OF RIVERSEDE @iorT4 v Oil before me, the undersigned, --knotary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeare @i/caiv&C @nilly know@me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to @e the person@s)'wh is bscribed to the within instrument @knowledged to me that he/she/@xecuted the same in I thorized capacity(ies), and that by his/he@the@ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity f which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. J. Perron WIT@SS hano @n( o@ se.. @m. #979975 c PUBLJC - CALIF@RN SiLyriattire SM DIEGO COUNTY k@ CERTrFlIC.%TE OF ACCEYT."INI--'-c This is 1 eyed Irrevocable Offe m@ntal aorc accepted e vv and th ee consents t th --'Date Gre City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 Revised Auqust 3, 1994 July 21, 1994 JN 400557-M27 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "Au LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, C@iintv of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 34 of Tra I ct No. i9872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, included within a strip of land 10.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the southeasterly line of said Lot 34 distant thereon North 46000'00" East 18.94 feet from the most southerly corner thereof; thence North 4904010011 West 33.18 feet; thence South 4600010011 West 17.83 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 34 distant thereon South 4704413611 East 10.02 feet from the most westerly corner thereof. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate southeasterly in said southeasterly line of Lot 34 and southwesterly in said southwesterly line of Lot 34. CONTAINING: 0.012 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of recor-. EXHIBIT uB" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L. 5 NO 19 lbi IL -'Zl 22.5"@ ,547044'3(o 210. 14' F HO- lirv@@ EXHIBIT SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mu tTi - PLj@ro6e Robert cBeij7,.cWilliam M-ost Dissociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANN@RS & SURVEYORS @A-f -W 28765 SINCLE OAM DRIVE.SUIIE 250- TEMECULA. CA 92390 loo.AL, -W-&IL (7 I @) E76 ON2 - FAX (714) 676 7240 DATE SCAI E ELD Bt)',)K JOB NO I_ 2_@ _q4 " @v II) @ 40 T M-2'1, / e,-9-94 I CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk i@ecorded at request of and return to: @-@ ncr@itirnent 43 1-14 Business Park- Dri@le - -@Lila, Ci@ 9'-590 i-t@E PECORDTNG: Parcel @ 91 8--i -00- 'FliLs instt-unient is i'or the benefit of tli@ Cit@ of Tt,-iiiecLila and is entitled Lo lie recorded without fee Prolect: Tr@ict 1 98-@ (Go@,t. Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A 'v'.-kLU.ABLE CONSIDERATION,receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Robert F. Harrison ("Grantor"), lierebv irre,,-ocabiv offers to dedicateto the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), to,,ether with the ri@ht to further -Yrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetualeasement and rl!aht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational trail, lnciLldini_,- malntainincy, operation, afterin-, repairing and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries ot' that certain real r)ror)ertv located in the Cltv of Temecula. Countv of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refernce (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its 2overrimental entity, successors, or assigns, detern3ines it is unable, incapable, or unwillin.,4 to a' in intain sai 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the respons'b'l'tv of GR-KNTOR, with all co\-enants and agreements of this easement extending to and becominq obligations of all he' I irs., executors. adrrn'nistrators, successors and assi-ns of the GRANTOR. GT 2OR ED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF R4N,-E J' Onbefore me, the undersigned, A Notarv Public in and for the State of California, personally appearedA- per -to me @or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) w@qse name(s@are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/they executed the same i@gs)her/their authorized capacity(les), and that bv daer/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS mv hand and o al seat. SiL).,nature CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certlfv that4the interest infeal property pbnveyed by th/within Irrevocable Offer To @dicate to the//City of Temecula, a politacal corporation,,and/or coverrk'nental a@encv,@is hereby accepted bv order of the Cltv Council the date below and the Grantee consents, to the recordation thereof by fts dulv authorized officer. Junc, S. Greek, City Cl,erk lisa riveroak lod.1rm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 2870'5 Sinr Oak Drive Temecula, Ca fornia 92590 November 11, 1994 JN 400557-M33 Page 1 o-' 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 38, TRACT NO. 19872 -ran+ r-artain Darcel of land situated in the C4,.y of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 38 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of Lot 38; thence along the southeasterly line of said lot North 35'57'20" East 18.46 feet; thence North 49'40'00" West 37.57 feet; thence @f^-+6 CC*Iglll" @,to,+ 0 47 Poo+ +te nor+kl,toc+o-ly line of said lot; thence along said northwesterly line South 33430'00" Wes' 10.00 feet to a line L' parallel with and 10.00 feet southwesterly from last said course; thence along said parallel line South 55*25'13" East 7.78 feet; thence South 49'40'00" East 17.78 feet to a line parallel with and 2O..OO feet northwesterly from said southeasterly line of Lot 38; t@ence aicng said parallel liie South 35'57'20" West 7.75 feet to said southwesterly line of Lot 38; thence along said southwesterly line South 47'44'36" East 20.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.014 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. S. 3527 loo,SA 4C NO. 19t ','le? @v@B. 2 /"I)- / 23 - 2 39 37 rAZ3L.r OF COZl,?5E5 1_71 A (D- A,'3.5 -5 7'20 'E /g. 46' I-A'rR(',EL- MAP NO. @ N4-q-40'aO-W 37,57' P.tvi.B, / L-i4 E'5 @,AI55-,-5'1.3"W e-47' FIAFR("EL- I S,?3 030'0,0 -W /,O. aa' S55,.?5113,E -7,76,, 54-9-4,0@,O-E 7. 79' (fy- 5.35-57','O"W -7. -7.5' 547--44'-?I,-E PQ. IZ' EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCIIIPTION SHEET / OF / SHEET MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL @rl' cbeiq "Tvilliam 9%st 6& Associates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 287" SINC3LE OAK DRTVE - SU TE 250 - TEMECULA CA 676 8042 FIAX 676 7240 DATE SCA ELD BOOK JOB NO 11-11-94 -T I.. =4 400557-M33 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \vasinobk\ lc&btm i 1. 051496 Recorded at requeit of and return to: C'", Clerks Depar'mL--it CiLv ot"Femecula -necula.CA Parcel: 918-3-; 3-008 This ins@ment is for the benefit of the Clr,- of -1 @me(:uia and is entitled to be recorded @vithout feePro.lect: Tract 1987'- (Go,,,t. Code 61031).ER-REVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V,,KLUABLE CONSIDEF-,kTION,receipt of which is hereby acknowled2ed, John Ravmond E(,elund and @ette M. E(-,elund ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the Citv of Temecula ("Grantee"), to2ether with the right to further (2rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rlt-,ht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational @Lrill, includin,-@ maintaininct, ope,,,,.tion, alte-in,,, repairin(,, and r@-placinez equipment and lindscapin(T o,,,er and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, Countv of Riverside, more n F Y h'b't -ittached hereto which i,,; incnrnnr,,t@d bv this refernce (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its Governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the respons' y of GRANTOR, with all maintain sal ibilit covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becorru'n(2 obliszations of all heirs, executors, adrm'ru'strators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. @OR GRANTOR /( - -7 L)ATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,j 10 COUNTY OF RFV-E - nit oeiore Me, Lne unuefsigneci appearedJO@o 0- @ J-1 A@@@ satisfactory eviden@to be th'@person(s) whose n" _Ls) is ,4oLarv rui)ii(; in anu tor Lfie 3iaie oi t-ailiornia, personally e (or proved to me on the basis of ri subsc 'bed to the w' hin' instrument and acknowledged it to me that he/she/ e@xecuted the same in his/her @'@e' 'authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her@ei signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS mv hand and official gni. JANA L GREENE comm. 4101 t @tCTARY PiE, @c- Si(2nature C, MARCH i i, I CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCEI This is tocertify, t@at the interest it real property eonveved by theAVithin Irrevocable Offer To @dicate to the City of Temecula,a poutacal corporation and/or goverrunental agency, hereby accepted by order of/the City Council the date w andthe Grantee consents to the recordation thereof bv its duly authorized officer. June,S. Greek, City Clerk lisa,,riveroak)iod.fr-m ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 October 31, 1994 JN 400557-M30 Page 1 of I EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 39 of Tract No. i9872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the northwesterly line of said Lot 39 distant thereon North 33'30'00" East 0.05 feet from the westerly corner thereof; thence South 55025'13" East 45.01 feet to the southeasterly line of said lot; thence along said southeasterly line North 33*30'00" East 10.00 feet to a line parallel with and 10.00 feet northeasterly from said line having a bearing of 'South 55'25'13' East";- thence along said parallel line North 55'25'13"- West 45.01 feet to said northwesterly line of Lot 39; thence along said northwesterly line South 33'30'00" West 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.010 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 ,IIIDO 3A ST. TRA C 141-11. @;3. 215 23 -2f,@ 40 39 36 I-:) A ll? t' 5 #A. MAP NO. it FI.M.B. t'-l 4 L-i 5 -7-ABLE OF eozlfSES V33-30',OO'Lc- O.,05, S-55-25'19"E 4.5.01 - /0,0,0' EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPNON SHEE T / OF SHEE T MULTIPURPOSE @n @iq, -William 9%st c& @.,.it@s RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFESSIC)NAL ENGINEERS. PLANNER; & SURVEYORS 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE - SUITE 250 - TEME IJLA CA 92M (7141676.ON2 - FAX (7141676 7210 DATE SCALF FIELD BOOK 10-31-94 I"=40' JOE licl@ t 400.r)57-M30 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly aL; -)orized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer :O@ dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: kytLsmobk@k&btmil.@ 496 Recorded at request of ind return to: City Clerks Department P, T' I,L- n ;,,iicL;ula, CA 92590 E RECOPDING@ P-,ircel: 918-37,-009 This instrument is for the benefit of the Ciiv of Temecula and is entitled to'De recorded without tec Pr ect: Tract 19872 (Go@-t. Code 61031). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A %@'ALU.@LE CONSIDE@,kTION, receipt of which is hereby aclcnowledaed, Richard A, Burnside and Debra S. Burnside ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grartee"), tocether with the ri-ht to further Lrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and ri('ht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational 11, includin(-, mainta'n'ns-,, operation, alterin(,, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscap'n tra I I =1 I c-, over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, Countv of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein bv this refernce (the "Easement Area"). I If G@,NTEE, or its Governmental entity, successors, or assians, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain sal 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GF-A-NTOR, w'th all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, successors and ass]-ns of the G@TOR. @GRANTOR GRANTOR "ED STATE OF CAL]IFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSEDE On Ildil@@ 2- before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally .@Z;iO-l@personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) 1 a@r ubscn'bed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sh e xecuted the same in his/he e@authon'zed capacity(ies), and that by his/h r their ignature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entltv upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNE official KEVIN M. PERRON COMM. #958604 0 Sliznatur CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE 11 This is to cer-ti@-.that the interest real property @onveved by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate/t/o the City of Temecula, a pofitacal corporatlcsn and/or governmental agency, is @rebv accepted by'order of the y Council the date C@ below and the,,Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its'duly authorized officer. June S@ Greek, City Clerk lisa, ri veroak',iod. frm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 November 11, 1994 JN 400557-M34 Page 1 of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 40, TRACT NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 40 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.011 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. ".Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 ut A 9 t7 ll"t? NO. @v 14. B. 2111,)- / t'? 3 - 40 39 11 5 -,i L- MAP NO. ,LA M. 4 - 6 5 F'A FR E L- I EXHIBIT '[3' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEE T / OF' SHEiEr MULTIPURPOSE @n -Beiq,-William 9%.t RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS A SURVEYOR@ @8765 SINGLE OAK [)RIVE - SUITE 2'30 - TEMECULA CA 676 8042 - FAX 676 7240 DATE ALE TF IF Lu JOB NO 11-11-94 I"=40' 1 400557-M34 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \yminobk\k&btmil.csd 051496 Recorded at request of and return to: Citv Clerks Department Citv of Temecula 4-,17-1 Business Pii-k- Drl%"@ T,-mecula, CA- 9'-590 -73 RECOP,,D[,NG. Parcel: 918-31 -010 This instrument is for the benefit of tile C t-,@ Of TeMeCUI@l and ;entitled I to be recorded without fee Project: Tract 19871 (G(-)-,-t. Code 6103). VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V.A-LU.ABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Marllvn A= Panaro ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), tocether with the rl,4ht to further izrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rl(,,ht-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational trail, including maintaining),, operation, altering, repairing,, and replacin(,- equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real propertv located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more par-ticulariv described in Exhibit "A" attached here@--- which is incorporated herein bv this refemce (the "Easement Area"). If CiR-ANT-EE, or its -Tov,ernmental entity, successors, or assi-ns, deternu'nes it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to a' 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the respons' y of GRANTOR, w' h all in intain sal I ibilit it covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, admiru'strators, successors and assicns of the GRANTOR. ED STATE OF CALIIFOR-NL@ SW @ &) -(-) COUNTY OF On L4 before m@the undersiizned, A Notary Public in and for the State of Cafifo@a, personally appeared person c)-me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evwence) be the person(s) whose name(s e subscribed to the within instrumentand acknowled ed 9 to me that heee)the'v executed the same in hi their authorized capacity(les), and that by hi@their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity u behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS mv hand and official seal. S'iQnature,- CERTIFICATE OF ACC@EPTANCE This is to certlfv that the interest/in real propert@conveyed bv the vcithin Irrevocable Offer To Dedic@e to the City of Temecula, a politacal corporation and/or nmental, agency, @s hereby accepted bv order of the City Council the date go below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by ds duly au',horl--",,-4 June@S. Greek, City,,Clerk t i s@,,ri veroa@@ iod. frm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 December 22, 1994 JN 400557-M32 Page 1 of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 41 OF TRACT NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State ol-' California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 41 of Tract No. 19872 as snown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.010 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT "Bo attached and by this reference made a part hereof. illiarel. Green, L.S. 4547 7- z 4-c' 4-1 FAGCEC- MAr- No. it@@ F'M @. @@/ 64 -6@ F,'AFZ CE L I EXHIBIT 'B'- SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET I OF 6USET MULTIPURPOSE @erl 'Beiit,'William @st 6& cgssociates RECREATIONALTRAIL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SUFTVEYORS 20761 '@;l@LE OAK DR?VR - SVITE 2SO - TEMECUL,@ @A 92390 (714)676 80@2 - VAX (7t4) 676 72.0 ScAt E FIELD BOOK JOB NO 12 -'Z'z ri 4-Fl I,= 401 40OG 57 - M 3Z DATE CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \ vas inobk\k&btmi 1. c.,d 051496 Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks T)epartment Citv of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive - -iecula, CA 92-@90 i @,ET-7 RECORDING. Parcel: 918-373-011 This instrument is tor the benefit of the C 1R, of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Project@ Tract 1, 98 (Go@-t. Code 6103). VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A N,'ALU.,kBLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Jeffrey L. Landis and I\/Ielissa Foland ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the Cltv of Temecula ("Grantee"), tolether with the rlezht to further Lrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and ri(2ht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational trail, Including maintaining, operation, alterinc,, repairing, and replacin,, equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refemce (the "Easement Area"). If GRAINTEE, or its Governmental entity, successors, or assi-ns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain sa id Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and acreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, adrm'nistrators, successors and assicns of the GRANTOR. G@TOR GRANTOR :ED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF be On the un@ersi P,;,ed, Notary Public in and for the State of Cali'fomia, personally appeared on y o e (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidertc @o be the person(s) whose cribed to the within instrument(and acknowledged to me that'he/she@/ ecuted the same in his/] capacity(les), and that by his/hk/the'l'r alure(s) Si on the instrument son(s), or the entity up ch the person(s) acted, executed the in ent. @l'ITNES n-I of 60 Cmm. !S ZIN @i,-,nature CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certlfv/that the interest/(n real property @onveyed by the @t n Irrevocable Wer To Dedicate'to the City of Temecula, a politacal corporation and/or coverninental reby accepted @ order of the Council the date CIIY below and the Grantee conseats to the recordation ther( authon' cer. z June S'. Greek, City Clerk lisa,,riveroak iod.frm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 December 22, 1994 JN 400557-M33 Page 1 of I LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 42 OF TRACT NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 42 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.010 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by th@eference made a part hereof. No. 4547 Exp. 9-30-98 L. Green, L.S. 4547 14137! P,4RCEL M4P NO.--- l@5@ PMB- (p3/64-n-5 P@Fz@L- EXHIBIT 'B' _SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET t OF I SH667- MULTIFURP05rc: @erT 'BeiQ,William 7Mst 6&c54ssociates RECREATIONAL TG-'AIL PPOFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS A SURVEYORS 20-,f,5 SINGLE OAK DRIVE - SU17F 250 - TEL4ECULOk, CA 92'390 1714) 676@8O@2 - FAX (7t4)S76 7240 DATE SCALE FIELD P@)OK JOB NO I-z-'Z7 -94. l@ 46 4 @ts 157 - kl 93 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer tc Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes ot recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer wtzh the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: @ y&%inobk\k&btra i I.csd 051496 Recoi-LieLi at request ot and return to: City Clerks Department Citv of Temecula 43174 Busines,; Park- Drive Temecula, CA 9?590 'E RECORDFNG: Parcel: 918-373-012 -.s instrument is for the benelit ol the Cirv of Temecula and is entitled to be r@c)rdeci without tee Project: Tract 19872 (Go@-t. Code 6 IO-' )). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A %.-kLU.-kBLE CONSFDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Kirk L. Clauson and Debrah i%.,I. Clauson ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the Cltv of Temecula ("Grantee"), toL),,ether with the rl,-,-ht to further szrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rloht-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational trail, Including maintainint,r, operation, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein bv this refernce (the "Easement Area"). If GRA-NTEE, or its (-Yovernmentat entity, successors, or assi(yns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwillin2 to R, it maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTO w' h all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,, a rators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. G@@OR GRANTOR -'TED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Si@nature CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This al prope nveyed by th 0 is to certify that the interq( in re i;Zthin Irrev cabl@ffer To Ded'cafe to the Citv of rt@CO @p @by Temecula, a'ol'tacal corp fton ancuor Governmental agency, accepted/by order of the City Council the date or: below andthe Grantee c ents to the recordation thereof by l@ duly authorized officer. Date June S. Greek, City Cterk lisa,ri@,ero.ik Tod frm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 November 29, 1994 JN 400557-M35 Page 1 of I LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 43, TRACT NO. 19872 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of R'verside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 43 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING:0.011 Acres, more or less. SUB,JECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 7 C A, 6U,i)o.5A S"- A @v,ol [3. @2 4f2 ,-'@"Al@(:EL- MIL"AF' [,!O. 1 1 5 Fl. M. E3. -%-) / Ei 4 - t-@ 5 F)A F@ (,E L- I EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET / OF SHEET MULTIPURPOSE @berl'BeirL,William @st 6&,,9ssociates RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 2fl765S(NGLEOAKDRIVE-SUITE250-TEMECULA CA92390 (714)679 8042 - FAX (714W 87@ 7240 L)AIF S(- FIE(N BOO], 11-29-94 I"=Ilol - 400557-M35 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: @y&i inobk@ k&btmil. c.,d 051496 Recorded at request of and return to: Cit-,,.Cle,-ks Fepartment Clt,v of Temecula Park Dnve femecula, CiV 92590 , RECORDING: Parcel: 918-373-013 This instrument is for the benefit of the Cit-,, of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fet Pro-lec;-,@ Ti-a,:t 1987'- il Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V.-kLU.-kBLE CONSIDER--kTION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. W'tlllam J. Ga,-,tiardi and Sarah Gac,liardi ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the Cltv of Temecula ("Grantee"), toc2ether with the right to further 2rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rllyht-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational 'I, -nclud'n,-, nia'iita'n'nL,,, operation, alter'nc,, repairing, and replacin,, equipment and landscaping over and within the tral 11 I I I I 1 = boundariesof that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly ,Icsc,- -ed 'n h-.-cto, wh'c,@ @s incorporated her-'n b@- th@s -.-@-rnce (the "Easement Ar--a"). it'G@NTEE,or its uoverriin@ntal entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwiiiinly to 'd Easement -,krea, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsible y of G@KNTOR, w' h all maintain sal I I I it it covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assicns of the GRA-NTOR. GRANTOR' GRANTOR ED STATE OF CALF-FO@NIA COUNTY OF j OTI before me, the undersigned A Notarv Public in and for the State of California, personally appearedi@ll i@ 6uv@ ac satisfactory eviden@) to te the pe'rson(s) whos' to me that he, sh the xecuted the same in his, e or proved to me on the basis of bscribed to the within instrument an@cknowledged on'zed capacity(ies), and that by his/her ignature(s) on the instrument t e person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. JANA L. @ENE WITNESS my hand an offitiil seal. 4, c- 12pir. t r c,: Si,natuLe CIFRTTFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE ocable Offer Yo Dedicate tp the City of This is to certi@, that the'lnterest in real property/6onveyed by Oe within Irr@ Temecula, a politacal corporation and/or Governmental a-enc@, is hereby @cepted by or@r of the City @ouncil the date below and the Grantee consents ta the recordation thereof its duly autfiorized officer// J e S. Greek,/,City Clerk lisa\riveroaL,dod.frm ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 October 31, 1994 JN 400557-M31 Page I of I LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 44 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.013 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 ST, NO, @2151 2,3-21. 45 44 A FR\", E L- P,,'. A P NC). I " 5 LI 5 PAR(:EL- I EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPNON SHEET I OF SHEET MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL tes PROF RVEYORS 92"0 10-31-94 JOP NO 40'0557-M31 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE T@!s is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \v@,inobk\k&btra it. 051496 Recoi-ded at request t)f and return to: City Clerks L)epiirtment Cirv of Temecula 43 1 '/ 4 Business P ark Drive Temecula, CA 9'-590 -E RECOR-DING@ Parcel: 918--,'f-,-014 @ instrument is for the benefit of the C[tv ot'Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Pr@lect: Tract 1987' (Go@,t. Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A %,-kL]UABLE CONSI]DEP-,kTION, receipt of which is herebv acknowledged, Eric G. Peterson, III and Chervl A. Peterson ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), to2ether with the ri-ht to further Lrant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and riaht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational trail, includin- maintaining, operation, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refemce (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its covemmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to 'dEasement Area, in 'ntenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GF-ANTOR, with all maintain sai at covenants and agreements of this easement extendin- to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, adim'nistrators, successors and assi-ns of the G@TOR. @- s / OL @,@ , C,-RANTOR G OR @LATED STATE OF CALIEFORN@ COUNTY OF -E @nO On d, A Notary Public in and for the State of Cal'fo 'a, personally c I before me, the un ne . 1 1 rm appeared Et-,c- G. -p@n I /'@A I o@Y], @sonary known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory ev'de@to be the person(s) w@o- se n@) is@are@ubscribed to the within instrument and Acknowledged on the instrument t@h'e 1 int WITNESS v@and and bfficlak@@ @M. #979975 Sianature- PUBLIC - CALIFCAN SM Dfr=GO CC@.NTY Expires oec. 15 - 1996 -A CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certif-,,- that *Lhe interest in real pro@ertv conveved @y the withi6 IrrevocableOffer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a politacal corporation and/or Governmental a-e/ncv, is herebv accepted @ order of t@e City Coul7'cil the date )w and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly/authorized o@cer. juiic City Clerk'/ lisa\rivert)akliod.frm to me that he/she/i"e @xecuted the same in his/herAhei@ut6orized capacity(ies), and that by his/her @erson(s), or the entity upon b@f of which the person(s) acted, executed the /t ignature(s) r Lent. ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 September 27, 1994 JN 400557-M28 Page 1 of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 45 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.011 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. -.--on, L.S. 3527 19t @v@ E3. f,5 23 2 Z f r_l 15 4-el AF?(',EL- MAF) NO, 115 -,i -,i F). M. B. q"r-I -3 84 t-15 P)AF?(,'EL- I EXHIBIT 'B' SKR=TCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET OF SHEET MULTIPURPOSE @r?'Beilt,'William @st 6&@ssociates RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 28765 SINGLE OAK E)RIVE - SUITE 250 - TEMECUT A. CA 923% (7141 676 5042 - FAX (714) 6?6 '240 DATE SCALE FIELD BC)OK I, IR t)(I 9-27-94 400557-M28 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests In real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents,,, the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: @yaitnobk\k&btrui I. cid 051496 [@cL:L)t Jed a, I-CLIUC.-;L 01 aild I-CLLiln Lo: City Clerks Depar-tment Cirv of Temecu,a 4-, 1 'i ' D LI,, IP@ii 'N Di-l\,k: TL:m--,@,iia, CA 92-@90 -E RECOPDING: ParcLI: This instrument is for the benet-it of' the Cl@, of Temecula and is entitled to he recorded ivithout fee Pr,)Iect@ T, act I 1)8-; (Go,,,t. Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V.,KLUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of wfiich is hereby acknowledged, Dou-las F. Huntlev and Shirley Huntle@, ("Grantor"), hei-ebv irrevocably, offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), to@,ether @@itli the rl(-).ht to further ,rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rllyht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational 'I, 'nclud'n,, maintaining,, operation, alter'na, repa'r'n-, and replac'nc, nd landscap'n- over and w th n the tral 1 1 =1 I = I I = i . equipment a I = I I boundaries of that certain real propertv located in the Cltv of Temecula, Countv of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this refemce (the "Easement -A-rea",). If GR-ANTEE, or its crovermnental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to I 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, w' h all ma nta n sal it covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, a s sors a ,gd as@i n s of the GF-KNTOR. TOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF @s@F 0, il -cl -c/4 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared'D@k@ e fi tE) Ffie (or proved to me on the basis of bscn'bed to the within instrument and acknowledged- horized capacity(ies), and that by his/@e ignature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entltv upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my han seal. JAN-A L. C,-EENE comi@l. 3 1 C. 4 1121,13 NOTARY PUBLCZALFC%'@LA Signatu SAN CIEGC) C@CUN s-@ My Commiamn Expires MARCH 11, 1998 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTAN -7 This is to certi:@, that the Interest in real prdpertv conveyed Kthe within Ipfevocable Offer,/To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a politacal corporation ancuo@covemrnental agency, is hereb,* acceoted by order of the City Council the date below and'the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its du authorized officer. June S. Greek, City Clerk lisaqiveroakl,iod.frm satisfactory evidenc@ t to be the' person(s) whos to me that he/s xecuted the same in his ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 October 31, 1994 JN 400557-M32 Page 1 of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 46 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.012 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 Ru TRACT NO. 9 8 215 23 - 2,7 4 46 45 P R C" E L m p NO, 1 j'5 8 4 65 PAFRC',EL I EXHIBIT 'B' -SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET / OF SHEET MULTIPURPOSE @iq"wllliam vast 6&c54ssociates RECREATIONAL TRAIL ESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 28708 S@NGLE 0 K OftiVE ;SUITE 2M - 7FUCCLOLA CA923W (71:) $76 004 - FAX (714) 6,6 7240 DATE 'CALE FIELD BC>OL< OB NO 10-31-94 I"=40' 400557-M32 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporate is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \vasinobk\k&btra i 1. csd 051496 Cl,v Clerks Department Cl"v of Temecula 431-114 Business Park Drive Temecula. C,-% 92590 - R-ECOPDING Parcel: 918-373-016 1 !its Instrument is t - or the benefit of the Cl@@ ot'Temecula and is entitled T) to be recorded %vittiout iec t. "ract I @)S-2 (Go@-T. C,)de 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A V,.kLU.A-BLE CONSIDEP--kTION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Keith N. Friddle and Lisa A. Friddle ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), to!zether with the ri-ht to further Lrant or transfel- the same to others, a perpetual easement and riaht-of-wav for a multi-purnose recreational trail, including maintaining, operation. alterin-, repairin-, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the Cltv of Temecula, Countv of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein bv this refernce (the "Easement Area"). If G@NTEE, or its Governmental entity, successors, or assi ns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to id Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the respons' 'I' y of GRANTOR, with all maintain sa ibi it covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assIL-ns of the G@NTOR. GRANTORCDRANTOR @fEDJANA L STATE OF CALIFORINIASAN@ COUNTY OFmy com-r MA On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California. personally d appeare pet:seiially !En (or proved to me on the basis of to be the person('s) whose name( N s) is/6Le subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that'he/she/@e executed the sam' e in his/he thorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/@'signature(s) on irie instrument the person(Is), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and Social s". JA.NA L. C- MARCHJI,i@"@-'@ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE bl,' th/ h;- Trrevoc@le Offer To igthat t, t This is to cert e 'Al; De@cate to the Ci@of Temecula, a politacal corporation and/or covernmental ac,,ency, is herebv accepted bv order of the City Council the date reoi y its ciu -)w anci tne urantee consents to Ene recurclaiion ine ly aulnorizcu %iiiil_ci. June S. Greek, City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 September 27, 1994 JN 400557-M29 Page I of I LEGAL DESCRIPTION MUL171PURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 47 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.024 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 0 A e"2 2,3 2 "I" 4 -7 FIPAFR ('E i-- MAP' NO. 11533 Fi . 3 L-4 4 L-i 5 F',C"AFR(:EL- I EXHIBIT 'E3' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET op, SHEET MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL @@cBeift,Wllliam %bst 6&@ssociates ESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 2876@ SINGLE OAK DRIVE - SUITE 250 - TEMECULA. CA 92M J714)676 8042 - FAX (7141 f76 7240 DATE S( E FIELD BOOK JOB NO 9-27-94 I"-, 10. 400557-M29 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: @ya.,inobk@ k&btrail.,@ 051496 IZecL). dell at i-ccluest t)['LinLi return to: Cltv Clerks D,,,partmcnt Citv ot'Temecula Temecula, CA 9'-590 @E PECORDFNG: Parcel: 918-373-017 This instrument is lor the benefit of the Cl@! (@t'Temecuia and is entitled to be recorded without t ce Orolect TrLict (Go%-T Code 6103). @VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A %@'ALUA-BLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, -Michael A. Barrett and Danette ,%,I. Barrett ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the rl(zht to fur-ther (-,rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rl,2ht-of-way for a multi-purpose recreational trail, including maintairu'n-, operation, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscapinia over and %Within the boundaries of that certain real propertv located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein bv this refernce (the "Easement If GR-ANTEE, or its governmental entitv, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to I 'dEasement Axea, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all ma ntain sal I I 11 covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and beconu'ng obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assicns of the GRANTOR. A-NTOR 6kANTOR DATED STATE OF CALrFORNL-k COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On before me, the unders'lcyned, A Notarv Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared L;i,i t Stiff Te- i.',i personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged Lo me Lnat he/she/thev executed the same in @s/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that t)y his/her/t@i signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entitv upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS y zd and official seal. R. Michael Brown Comm. #1019077 NOTARYPUB--IC CALIFORNIA@,' 11 4 @-CrU,4TY @j @iunature Cc,-m 27 1993 CERTIEFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest/in real propert@ conveyed by th@ithin Irrevoca6le Offer To Deci7cate to the City of -necula, a politacal corporation and/or gover'mental agency@'is hereby accept/ed by order of th@ City Council the date .)W and the; Grantee consents to the record/ation thereof by/@ts duly authorized officer. Date June S. Greek, City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590 September 7, 1994 JN 400557-M20 Page I of 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being the southwesterly 10.00 feet of Lot 48 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 21:. Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County. CONTAINING: 0.019 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. e L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 NC). l9L3 5.Z AFR("EL- rA.L"AF) NC). I 1 5 F). M. Ei. 4 k--i 5 A F?l ('I E L- I EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET OF SHEET MULTIPURPOSE @rl 9!leitL,William @st 6&@ssociates RECREATIONAL TRAIL OFESSIONAL ENGINEERS PLANNERS A SURVEYORS 28705 SIN()LE OAK OR@ - BUI@E 2SO - TEUFCLPLA. CA (714@ 676 8042 -FAX f7l4) 879 '240 OATE SCAI E FIELD BOOK 9-7-94 I"=40 . I(,R NO 400557-M20 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r: \y as inoblc\k&btmil.,M 051496 R ,-,@)rcfed it i-e(lu@-t of and return to: Lik '@- Clei-is Dcliai-tiliQllt Citv of Tem@ula 4', 174 Business Park Dnve 'I'emccula. Li@ ')25')O P ECORDING: Parcel: 918-373-001, 918-373-00'-), 918-3'173-00@ 'I'his instrument is for the benefit of the Citv 918-373-008, 918-373-009, 918-373-010, 918--',73- 'T@niecula and s entitled to be recorded 0 1 1, 9 1 8-"7' -3 ot -0 12, 918-3! -,-013, 918-3 -014, let ((3ox-t. C@)Lic 6 10-',) 918-373-015, 918-373-016'9 1 1 7" 918-3-3- 0 Pro'lect: Tract 19872 IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR .-k %,'.ALUABLE CONSIDEF-,kTION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Kaufman and Broad of San Die2o, Inc. ("Grantor"), herebv irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), touether with the rl,-,ht to furher -4rant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and rlszht-of-wav for a multi-purpose recreational tfall, including maintaining, operation, alterin-, repairin,,, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real prot)ertv located in the Cltv of Temecula, Countv of Riverside. more pariicuiarty ciescribeci in hxtiibit "A' attacned tiereco, which is incorporated tierein i)y tnis ret@rnce @tne "Easement Nrea") If G@NTEE, or its Governmental entity, successors, or assi-ns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to 'd Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, w' h all maintain sal it covenants and agreements of this easement extendin d becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and a GRANT@ DATED STATE OF CALEFORNIA COUNTY OF z 0 n m@the under n N y Public in and for the State of California, personally -4 @ly known to me (or proved to me on the basis of appeare d I K) A @i , satisfactory evidence) . to be th4erson(s) whose na@(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/'she/'they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s@ zcted, extcige-d the-jwtLuWetit - PAMELA J. APAGON COMM. ~938 z WITNESS @h z Notary Pt -bHc@liforr4a SAN DIEGO COUNTY s i n at my comn. expires APR 12.19% CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certlfv t@at the interes@in real propev(y conveyed by I I ,the within Irr@ocable OfferTo Dedicate to@he City of T-,-necula, a politacal corporation and/or governmental ageircy, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date ,v and the/Grantee consen/ts to the rec@'dation there I y its duly au@orized office@ O@ June S. Greek, City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, W[I-LIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 T--iecula, California 92590 Revised January 10, 1995 December 22, 1994 JN 40CI.c:57-M36 Page 1 of 1 EXIIIBIT "An L SCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE RECREATIONAL TRAIL LOT 53 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 53 of Tract No. 19872 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 215, Pages 23 through 27 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, included within a -@.trip of land 10.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of a I iiie parallel with and 5.00 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly line of said Lot 53 with the southeasterly line of said lot; thence along said parallel line North 47*44'36" West 22.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 100.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 87'22'51' East; thence along said curve northerly 51.43 feet through a central angle of 29'27'57"; thence non-tangent from said curve, along a line perpendicular to the northwesterly line of said Lot 53 North 66029'43" West 21.00 feet to a line parallel with and 5.00 feet southeasterly from said northwesterly line; thence along said parallel line South 23'30'17" West 46-87 feet to the southwesterly line of Lot 53. Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened southeasterly so as to terminate in said southeasterly line of Lot 53 and southwesterly so as to terminate in said southwesterly line of Lot 53. CONTAINING: 0.032 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by h.is.r(-,Ference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 E3. 2 5,3 5 03 4to 10 7' /V 4 7'@ 4f 136 "W 5:?6 1 A147',M'36-W FIAFRC"EL- M A'r" NO. 11 53-i F).M.B. @,' -I-') / L14-05 FIAFR("EL- EXHIBIT 'B' _SKETCH SHEET / OF SHEET TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION MULTIPURPOSE @ert cbeiq. 'William @st 6& Associates RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROFESSIONAL EN3 INEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS 28765 SINGLE nAK DPIVE ;SLOITE 250 -IEMCCULA. CA g?390 LOT -@ OF TFACT NO- 1957Z rAX(71.@676-7210 REVISED 1-10-95 SCALE ELD BOOK JOB NO 12-22-94 1 I"=30' 1 400557- M3(o CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interests in real property as set forth in the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, is herby accepted fo purposes of recordation by order of the City Council on and City consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer with the understanding that the City does not, at this time, accept the offer of dedication. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk r. @yutnobkkk&btmil. csd 051496