HomeMy WebLinkAbout082796 CC Agendain compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to
a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting
128 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
AUGUST 27, 1996 - 7:00 PM
5-30 PM - Closed @Session of the @City Council/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government
Code Sections,.
1. 54956.8, Conference@with@Real'@Property negotiator-. Pro erty-@28747'Pujol Street,.
PI
Temecula,@California. (APN 922-062-020),- Negotiating Parties:@R.A. Nor@indin and C.E.
Normindin@and the City of Temecula;:Under Negotiation: price and terms of payment.".
2.@549.56.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated@Litigation,@one matter.@@
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue
all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All
meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Next in Order*
Ordinancee No. 96-1 8
Resolutiono No. 96-104
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding
Prelude Music: Christan Krag
Invocation: Associate Pastor Mike Patton
Southwest Christian Church
Flag Salute: Councilmember Roberts
ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
R:@enda\082798 1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an
item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter n= listed on the Agenda, a pink
'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a 'Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five
(5)minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 0) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of
the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
1Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2A120roval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Approve the minutes of August 13, 1996.
R:@anda\082786 2
3Resolution Apl2roving List of Dem@
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
5Establishina a Fee Schedule for the City Clerk's Department
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-59 WHICH ESTABLISHED A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT "A"
6Accel2t Public Iml2rovements in Tract No. 25004-1 (Located Northeasterly of the intersection
of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 25004-1;
6.2Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Streets and Drainage and Water, and Sewer Bond amounts and release
of the Subdivision Monument Bond.
6.3Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
R:\Age@\082796 3
7Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract Nn. 21082-1
(Located Northwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond and the Material and
Labor Bond for street, water, and sewer improvements for Tract No. 21082-1;
7.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and notify the
Developer and Surety.
8Award of Construction Contract for Proiect No. PW96-10 FY96-97, Citywide A.C. Street
Rel2airs
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1Award a contract for Project No. PW96-10, FY96-97 Citywide A.C. Street Repairs,
to Universal Asphalt for $1 69,469.45 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
8.2Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $16,946.95 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
9Award of Contract for the Construction of a Tr@ Sianal at the Intersection of Ranc@
California Road and Cosmic Drhve/Humber Drive - Project No. PW96-QB
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1Award a contract for the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Cosmic Drive/Humber Drive, Project No. PW96-08 to Signal
Maintenance, Inc. for $74,1 55.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
9.2Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $7,415.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
R:\Agerida\082796 4
1 0Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Ma4ntamned Street System (Within Tract
25004-1) (Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North General
Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 25004-1)
1 1Agreement Reaarding Prooosed Stream or Lake Alteration between California Del2artment of
Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridoes
over Murrieta Creek
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1Approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration (Notification
No. 5-003-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City of
Temecula;
11.2Direct the Director of Public Works to sign said Agreement.
12Summary Vacation of a Portion of South General Kearny Road from La Serena Wa@
Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY
VACATING A PORTION OF SOUTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD BETWEEN LA SERENA
WAY AND MEADOWS PARKWAY. SAID RESOLUTION IS PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND
HIGHWAY CODE
13Final Tract Mar) No. 23371-15 (Located northerly of Rancho California Road, between
Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1Approve Final Tract Map No. 23371-15 subject to Conditions of Approval.
R:\AoendskOB2798 6
1 4 Resolution in Support of Murrieta Creek Pilot Program
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING
THE MURRIETA CREEK PILOT PROJECT
1 5 CalPERS Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan for Service Credit Purchases
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE CALPERS PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVIC
CREDIT PURCHASES ICONTRIBUTION CODE 14)
1 6Solid Waste Franchise Aareement Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement with CR&R
Incorporated to modify mutually agreed upon areas within the original franchise.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1 7Second Readina of Ordinance No. 96-17
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
CHAPTER 8.24 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "HABITAT
CONSERVATION" ESTABLISHING NEW AND MODIFYING EXISTING REQUIREMENTS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ON THE
HABITAT OF THE STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT
R:@@\082796 a
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING,
OLD TOWN[WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FIN@ING AUTHORITY MEE@
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance:No. CSD 96-01
Resolution:No. CSD 6-10
CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item = listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to
Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record,
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Approve the minutes of August 13, 1996.
R:@rida\OB2796 7
2Amendment to TCSD Landscar)e Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Approve contract amendment of $19,500 with Excel Landscape, Inc. to provide
landscape maintenance services for the Sports Park Improvement Project for FY
1996-97.
3Aareement for Softball Offqcffiatmna Services
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1Approve agreement between the City of Temecula and the Margarita Officials
Association for providing City softball league officiating services.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: September 10, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:@e@\08279a 8
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next in Ordere
Ordinances No. RDA 96-01
Resolution:No. RDA 6-16
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item r=
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1Approve the minutes of August 13, 1996.
2Interim Fundina for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce and the Temecula Valley
Economic Development Corporation and the Temecula Valley Film Co@
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Approve an interim funding request for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce,
the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and the Temecula Valley
Film Council.
R:\Aoenda\082796 9
3Contract Amendment No. 1. Professional Services with Tom Dodson & Associates for
Environmental Consulting Services for the First Street and Western BY12ass Corridor Bridges
over Murrieta Creek and Phases I and 11 of the Western Byr)ass Corridor - PW 95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1Approve the Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Services for Environmental
Consulting Services for the First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridges over
Murrieta Creek and Phases I and 11 of the Western Bypass Corridor to Tom Dodson &
Associates for $10,000.00 and authorize the Chairperson to execute the contract.
4Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW95-26, The Sixth Street Parkin@
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1Award a contract for project No. PW95-26, the Sixth Street Parking Project, to
General Consolidated Constructors, Inc., for $593,000.00 and authorize the
Executive Director to execute the contract.
4.2Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $59,300.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
5Amendment to Ground Lease with Dual Develoi2ment Inc. (Sixth and Front Streets)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1Approve the First Amendment to Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development Inc.
5.2Authorize the City Clerk to record the original lease agreement and this amendment.
6Residential Rehabilitation Program
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1Adopt a resolution entitled-.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH A RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
PROGRAM TO ASSIZ- PROPERTY OWNERS TO REHABILITATE
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING,
IMPROVING AND PRESERVING THE SUPPLY OF LOW AND
MODERATE INCOME HOUSING WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA OF THE CITY.
6.2Authorize the expenditures of up to $200,000. From RDA Housing Set-aside ACCOL
No. 165-199-813-5804 to establish the First-time Homebuyer Program.
R:@er.da%082796 1 0
AGENCY BUSINESS
7Temecula Pro Rodeo
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1Consider a request for sponsorship for the 1996 Temecula Pro Rodeo.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 10, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:@andaNO82796 1
OLD TOWNCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Ordere
Resolution No.: No. FA 96-12
CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item = listed on the Agenda a pink 'Request
To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address,
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 13, 1996.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: September 10, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:@anda\082796 1 2
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing
or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
1 8A12peal of the Plannina Commission Finding of Public Convenience and Necessity for the
Offsite Sale of Beer and Wine at the proposed ARCO AM/PM at the Corner of Winchester
and Nicolas Roads (PA96-0073)
RECOMMENDATION:
1 B. 1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, FINDING THAT
THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR THE PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD NOT BE SERVED
BY THE ISSUANCE OF AN OFF SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO
AM/PM MINI MARKET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND
NICOLAS ROAD
DR
18.2Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT
THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ON THE PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD BE SERVED BY
THE ISSUANCE OF AN OFF SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO AM/PM
MINI MARKET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS
ROAD
R:@enda@082796 1 3
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19County Free Library Advisory Committee Apl2ointment
(Continued from the meeting of August 13, 1996)
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1Appoint a representative for the City of Temecula to the Riverside County Free
Library Advisory Committee for a two year term.
20Desionation of Vot*na Delegate for National Leaaue of Cities Annual Conference
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1Designate a voting representative and an alternate.
21TEAM Community Pantry Salaries
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1Review and provide direction to staff regarding funding to the TEAM Community
Pantry.
22Temecula Valley Museum Loan Request
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1Consider a loan request from the Temecula Valley Museum, in an amount not to
exceed $60,000, for the completion of the museum building at Sam Hicks Monument
Park.
22.2Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and necessary loan
documents.
23Temecula Library Service Alternatives Feasibility Study
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1Approve the proposal submitted by David M. Griffith & Associates to conduct a
study to determine the future fiscal viability of the Temecula Library.
23.2Appropriate a maximum of $42,200 from Development Impact Fees - Library to fund
the City's portion of the Library Study.
R:\Agenda\082796 14
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Special Meeting - City Council Policies and Procedures - 9:00 AM - 1:00 PM -
Saturday, September 7, 1996, Main Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Next regular meeting: September 10, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:\Aganda\OB2796 16
ITEI\4 1
ITEI\4 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 13, 1996
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:43 PM. It was moved
by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session
at 5:43 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. 54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: Westside of Front Street,
west of Interstate 15, Temecula (APN 922-110-005); Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula and
Margarita Canyon LLC; Under Negotiation: price and terms of payment.
2.54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: Napa Auto parts; Negotiating
Parties:Redevelopment Agency of the city of Temecula and NAPA Auto Parts; Under
negotiation:Value of Agency interest in property and terms of payment.
3.54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, one matter.
4.54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, City of Temecula v. KR
Palm Plaza.
5. 54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, City of Temecula v.
Mervyns.
6. 54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, City of Temecula v. Ted
Zonos and Alexandra Zonos.
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Roberts absent. Mayor Lindemans
declared the closed session adjourned at 6:33 PM.
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Stone,
Lindemans
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -1- 08120/96
Coty Counc I Mbnutes
Auaust 13, 1996
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Jarom Lamb.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Father Edward Renner, St. Thomas Episcopal Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Ford.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Thorson stated that in accordance with the Brown Act, there was nothing to
report from Closed Session.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Lindemans proclaimed August 24, 1996 as 'Kids Care Fair Day.' Ann Kuss and Tomi
Arborgast of Inland Valley Regional Medical Center thanked the Mayor and City Council for the
proclamation and explained the services provided to the children of the community on 'Kids
Care Fair Day.'
Brian Loew, Executive Director of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, gave an
overview of the future of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency as it relates to
multi-species as a whole.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, voiced his opposition to permitted uses for sale of pornographic
materials and requested the City Council review its Adult Entertainment Ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone requested City Manager Bradley contact Murrieta City Manager to
schedule a Joint Murrieta Creek Advisory Committee Meeting. He further requested a
presentation on the 'Right-to-Vote Initiative' be placed on a future agenda, to provide the City
Council a public with a review of the initiative.
Councilmember Ford invited the public to visit Old Town on Friday and Saturday night,
explaining shops and restaurants are open and live entertainment is being performed.
Mayor Lindemans announced the Navy has dedicated and named an airplane, 'The City of
Temecula' and stated a presentation will be made to the outgoing and incoming Navy
Commanders, who live in the City of Temecula.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -2- 08/20/96
C*tv Counc'l M'nutes
Auaust 13. 1996
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Clerk June Greek announced a minor modification on Consent Calendar Item No. 8, stating
staff recommends deleting Recommendation No. 8.3, as it is no longer necessary. On Item No.
1 9, City Clerk Greek also noted a minor modification to the contract, agreed upon by both
parties.
Councilmember Stone stated he would abstain on Item No. 2.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-25, with Councilmember Stone abstaining on Item No. 2.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Stone, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
1 . Standard Ordinance Adopthon Procedure -
1.1Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
2.Approval of Minutes
2.1Approve the minutes of July 9, 1996.
2.2 Approve the minutes of July 23, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Minutes\08\13N96 -3- 08/20/96
C'tv Counc@l Monutes Auaust 13, 1921
3.Resolution Agprov"ng List of Dem@
3.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4.City Treasurer's Report
4.1Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 1996.
5.Increase in the City's Petty Cash Fund Limit
5.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
INCREASING THE "PETTY CASH" FUND TO $1,500
6.Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 22nd Year Community Development
Block Grant Funds
6.1Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreements for the 22nd Year
Community Development Block Grant Funds.
6.2Authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements with the
Emergency Food and Aid Program and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP
Tots) for administration of the 22nd Year Community Development Block Grant
Funds.
7.Lease of Fire Equupment
7.1Approve a lease agreement with the County of Riverside for a 1995 Emergency
One Fire Engine and one Chevrolet S-10 extended cab fleet side pick-up truck.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -4- 08/20/96
City Council Mwnutes
Auaust 13, 19H
8.Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 19 6 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exg2endotures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Exg2enses
and Chanoes On Retained Earnings for the Year Ended June 30, 1 996
B. 1Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Year
Ended June 30, 1996.
8.2Approve the transfers of $68,500 within the Police Department line item budget
and $98,000 within the Fire Department line item budget.
9.Release Securities for Grading and Erosion Control for PA95-0089
(Located northwesterly of Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue)
9.1Authorize release of Certificates of Deposit submitted as grading and erosion
control securities for PA95-0089 for the expansion of existing First Pacific
National Bank parking lot at 41615 Winchester Road;
9.2Direct the City Clerk to release said securities to the developer-surety.
10.Substitute Subdivision Improvement Aareements and Public Improvement Bon@
Parcel Map No. 23496. (Located at the Northwesterly intersection of Ynez Road at
Rancho California Road)
10.1Approve novation of the existing Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
10.2Authorize release of the existing subdivision securities identified;
10.3Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, substitute Securities,
Traffic Signal Mitigation Agreement and Signal Mitigation Bond, for Parcel Map
No.23496;
10.4Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties.
11.Release Grading Securities in Tract No. 26861 (Located Southwesterly of intersection
of Highway 79(S) at Margarita Road)
11.1Authorize the release of Grading Bonds in Tract No. 26861;
11.2Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -5- 08/20/96
City Councol Minutes
Auaust 13, 1996
12.Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-F (Located Northeasterly corner of
Santiago Road at Margarita Road)
12.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-F;
12.2Authorize the initiation of one-year warranty period, reduce the Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts;
12.3Accept substitute bonds;
12.4Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
13.Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-3 (Located Northeasterly of the
intersection of Santiago Road at Margarita Road)
13.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 24134-3;
13.2Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduce the Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amount;
13.3Accept substitute bonds;
13.4Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
14.Acceptance of Public Streets into the C*ty-Magnta*ned Street System (Within Tracts
24134-3 and 24134-F) Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Margarita Road at
Santiago Road)
14.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 24134-3 AND 24134-F)
15.Accel2t Public Improvements in Tract No. 24133-3 (Located at the Northeasterly corner
of Santiago Road at Margarita Road)
1 5.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 24133-3;
1 5.2Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduce the Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts;
15.3Accept substitute bonds; and direct the City Clerk to so advise Developer and
Surety.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -6- 08/20196
C'tv Council Minutes
Auaust 13, 1921
16.Accel2t Public Improvements in Tract No. 241 33-2 (Located Easterly of the intersection
of Santiago Road at Margarita Road)
16.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 24133-2;
16.2Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduce the Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts;
16.3Accept substitute bonds;
16.4Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
I n
17.Acceptance of Public Streets Onto the Cuty-Mainta' ed Street System (Within Tracts No.
24133-2 and 24133-3) (Located Easterly of the intersection of Margarita Road at
Santiago Road)
17.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 24133-2 AND 24133-3)
18.Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds for Tract
No. 23371 (Located at the Northeasterly intersection of Margarita Road at Rancho
California Road)
18.1Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Faithful
Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street and Storm Drain
Improvements for Tract No. 23371;
18.2Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
19.Approve Agreement and Bond for Long Valley Wash Maintenance Offsate to Tract No.
23371 (Located Northwesterly of Yukon Road at Rancho California Road)
19.1Accept the Improvement Agreement and Faithful Performance Bond for
Maintenance Responsibilities for a portion of the 'Long Valley Wash' offsite to
Tract No. 23371-1;
19m2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -7- 08/20/96
C'tv Council Minutes
Aunust 13, 19H
20.Acceptance of Public Streets into the C@ty-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts NO-
22716-4 and 22716-E (Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway
at Rancho Vista Road)
20.1Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22716-4 AND 22716-F)
21.Solicitation of Construction Bids, Apg)roval of the Plans and Specifications @
A1212rol2riat@on of Funds for Cotywode Intelligent Traffic Manaaement System - Phase-L
Project No. PW95-16
21.1Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-16,
Citywide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS) - Phase 1.
21.2Appropriate $70,000.00 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital
Improvements project fund.
22.Award a Contract for Commun*ty-Recreation Center Emeraency Generator Proiect No.
PW95-02CSD
22.1Award a contract for the Community Recreation Center Emergency Generator
Project No. PW95-02 to Rohm Construction, Inc. in the amount of $109,832.00
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
22.2Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $10,983.20 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
23.Contract Change Order No. 2 for Cotywode P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW96-06
23.1Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No.
PW96-06, for an additional 53 L.F. of curb and gutter replacement.
24.Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-E-(Located Northeasterly of intersection
of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
24.1Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 22716-F;
24.2Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amount to the warranty level
for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements;
24.3Direct the City Clerk to so advise the several Developers and Sureties.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -a- 08/20/96
C'tv Council Minutes
Auaust 13, 19al
25.Acceg)t Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-4
(Located Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
25.1Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-4;
25.2Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amount to the warranty level
for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements;
25.3Direct the City Clerk to so advise the several Developers and Sureties.
RECESS
Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 7:46 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
scheduled Community Services District Meeting, Redevelopment Agency Meeting and the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities Financing Authority Meeting, at 7:51 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
26.Adoption of a Habitat Conservation Ordinance for the Stevens Kangaroo Rat
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. City
Attorney Peter Thorson stated that just prior to tonight's meeting, he received a copy
of the amendment that the County of Riverside adopted, and found that several changes
were made, although they seem to be minor.
Councilmember Ford expressed concerns about the findings and suggested this be
adopted as an interim ordinance.
Mayor Lindemans opened the public hearing at 7:59 PM. Hearing no requests to speak,
Mayor Lindemans closed the public hearing at 7:59 PM.
RECESS
Mayor Lindemans called a brief recess at 8:00 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:03 PM.
City Attorney Thorson stated after conferring with Councilmember Ford, he recommends
adopting both the urgency and permanent ordinance and bringing forward any necessary
changes in the form of an amendment.
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -9- 08/20/96
City Councel M@nutes
Auaust 13, 19H
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve
staff recommendation 26.1 as follows:
26.1Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-16
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDING CHAPTER 8.24 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED
"HABITAT CONSERVATION" ESTABLISHING NEW AND MODIFYING EXISTING
REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT
IMPACTS ON THE HABITAT OF THE STEPHEN'S KANGAROO RAT
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Roberts absent.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve
staff recommendation 26.2 as follows:
26.2Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
CHAPTER 8.24 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "HABITAT
CONSERVATION" ESTABLISHING NEW AND MODIFYING EXISTING
REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT
IMPACTS ON THE HABITAT OF THE STEPHEN'S KANGAROO RAT
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Roberts absent..
COUNCIL BUSINESS
27.County Free Library Advisory Committee Appointment
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of August 27, 1996. The motion was unanimously
carried with Councilmember Roberts absent.
28.Appointment of Votina Reg)resentative for League of California Cities Conference
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to appoint
Mayor Lindemans as the voting delegate and Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall as alternate to the
League of California Cities Conference to be held October 13, through October 15,
1996. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Roberts absent.
Minutes\08\13\96 -10- 08/20/96
Caty Councol Minutes Auaust 13, 1996
29.Community Services Fundina Ad Hoc Sub-Commottee
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Lindemans to appoint
Councilmember Stone and Councilmember Ford to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee to
review applications for the FY 1996-97 Community Services Funding Program. The
motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Roberts absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Bradley reported the Department of Fish and Game has approved the City's use
of a "rubber track' vehicle to clear the bottom of the Murrieta Creek of undergrowth. This will
be completed at the City's expense prior to the rainy season.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn at 8:15
PM to a meeting on August 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember
Roberts absent.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Minutes\08\1 3\96 -11- 08/20/96
ITEI\4 3
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMIECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLA@ AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHI]Brr A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,130,444.26
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 115
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 27th day of August, 1996 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Resos 115 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/08/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 208,353 1 C
08/15/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 97,363.08
08/27/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,671,387.67
08/08196 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 153,340.35
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08127196 COUNCIL MEETING: $130 444 26
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS@
001 GENERALFUND $1,049,557.43
100 GASTAXFUND 1,087.76
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 0.00
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.00
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 1,471.00
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 65,247.76
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 7,957.12
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 22,103.54
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 6,124.10
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 846.37
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 554,435.10
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 193,699.72
300 INSURANCE FUND 25,709.59
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 35,662.75
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 10,142.22
340 FACILITIES 3,059.45 1,977,103.91
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL $101,542.01
100 GASTAX 0.00
165 RDA-LOWIMOD 1,603.63
190 TCSD 36,381.31
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 69.42
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 173.17
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,829.57
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,044.99
280 RDA-CIP 2,991.60
300 INSURANCE 615.13
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2,899.69
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 737.63
340 FACILITIES 2,452.20 153,340.35
ND: $ 2,130,444.26
PREPAR E
1, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
GENI T@, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
I
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 5
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 123,203.35
100 GAS TAX FUND 127.76
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 1,160.25
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 33,880.19
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 42.68
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 115.62
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 1,878.96
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 846.37
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 6,375.77
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 13,340.48
300 INSURANCE FUND 11,450.63
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,704.09
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 10,125.09
340 FACILITIES 2,101.92
TOTAL 208,353.16
E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
0,,-0/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30462 08/06/96 KAREN RAE & FREDRICK OR SETTLEMENT-CLAIM 495-164 300-199-999-5207 1,000.00 1,000.00
30463 08/06/96 KAREN RAE & FREDRICK OR SETTLEMENT-CLAIM #95-164 300-199-999-5207 4,000.00 4,000.00
30464 08/06/96 KAREN RAE & FREDRICK OR SETTLEMENT-CLAIM #95-164 300-199-999-5207 1,000.00 1,000.00
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 16,641.57
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 174.23
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,665.74
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 9.01
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 22.15
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 500.22
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 162.18
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 341.48
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 137.01
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 709.72
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 118.81
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 216.16
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,814.34
'--013 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 56.44
3 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,289.16
13 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 2.38
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 5.97
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 103.43
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 37.25
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 101.23
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 23.64
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 124.68
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 25.90
635913 08/08/96 000283 WELLSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 81.94 29,364.64
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 119.39
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 2.01
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 161.07
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 4.89
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 11.84
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 16.00
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 4,473.00
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 47.73
695998 08/08196 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 934.33
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 1.69
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 3.90
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 120.72
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 30.04
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 77.89
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 41.70
695998 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 205.45
6@098 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 23.61
3 08/08/96 000444 WELLSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 28.02 6,303.28
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S - T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-100-999-5230 29.16
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-110-999-5230 93.47
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-120-999-5230 185.68
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-162-999-5230 51.52
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 190-180-999-5230 159.90
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-171-999-5230 6.15
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 280-199-999-5230 577.48
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-140-999-5230 461.00
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-150-999-5230 117.87
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-161-999-5230 455.34
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 001-164-604-5230 363.24
30466 08/08/96 000680 A M S T M S DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE 320-199-999-5230 .96 2,501.77
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 574.36
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 12.25
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 71.91
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 .49
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 12.25
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 2.44
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70
30467 08/08/96 000116 A V PVISION PLANS CORBR/AUGUST 1996 001-1180 9.75 70@
30468 08/08/96 ALDANA, BEATRIZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00
30469 08/08/96 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE COMPAN DETOUR SIGNS FOR RUSTIC GLEN 001-164-601-5244 116.00
30469 08/08/96 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE COMPAN TAX 001-164-601-5244 8.99 124.99
30470 08/08/96 AMERICAN ASSOC RETIRED REISSUE CK#25270 RFND SEC DEP 190-2900 100.00 100.00
30471 08/08/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 436.72
30471 08/08/96 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 149.29 586.01
30472 08/08/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 7/13 WILLIAMS 001-161-999-5118 144.48
30472 08/08/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 7/13 REEVES 001-120-999-5118 56.44
30472 08/08/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP WIE 7/20 WILLIAMS 001-161-999-5118 216.72 417.64
30473 08/08/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. BOTTLED WATER - CITY YARD 001-164-601-5240 68.04 68.04
30474 08/08/96 001943 B R W, INC. MAY PROF SRVCS-SIGNAL R.CAL RD 210-165-664-5802 2,790.00 2,790.00
30475 08/08/96 BAKER MOTIVATION INC REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
30476 08/08/96 000679 BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU RECEIPT BOOKS FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5222 223.32 223.32
30477 08/08/96 ROWERS, HEATHER REFUND-MUSIC FOR TODDLERS 190-183-4982 28.00 28.00
30478 08/08/96 BRIGHT, KATHY REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
30479 08/08/96 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES AUG O.T. RESTROOM RENTAL 280-199-999-5212 826.00 8?,' no
30480 08/08/96 000924 C A P P 0, INC. CF:PURCHASING A.KUHNS 12/6 001-140-999-5261 60.00
30480 08/08/96 000924 C A P P 0, INC. CF:PURCHASING M.VOLLMUTH 12/6 001-140-999-5261 60.00 120.00
E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VDUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30481 08/08/96 000839 C E L S 0 C PUB:96 CA ENV QUALITY ACT/CEQA 001-161-999-5228 13.19 13.19
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 001-2370 4,520.59
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 165-2370 72.55
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 190-2370 2,079.29
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 191-2370 .89
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 192-2370 2.22
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 193-2370 232.31
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 194-2370 29.00
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 280-2370 93.81
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 300-2370 8.37
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS CC)MP INS JUL 96 320-2370 49.86
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 330-2370 9.62
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 340-2370 274.64
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 001-1182 174.77
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 001-161-999-5112 2.87
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 001-164-604-5112 1.43
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 190-180-999-5112 1.97
30482 08/08/96 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP INS JUL 96 190-181-999-5112 1.41 7,555.60
@4 08/08/96 001185 CALIFORNIA ASSN PARKS A CPRS WRKSHP-S.YASINOSKY 8/21 190-180-999-5260 10.00
84 08/08/96 001185 CALIFORNIA ASSN PARKS A SEM:CPRS WRKSHP-H.PARKER 8-21 190-180-999-5260 10.00
30484 08/08/96 001185 CALIFORNIA ASSN PARKS A SEM:CPRS WRKSHP-P.RUSE 8/21 190-180-999-5260 10.00
30484 08/08/96 001185 CALIFORNIA ASSN PARKS A SEM:CPRS WRKSHP-P.THORSON 8-21 190-180-999-5260 10.00
30484 08/08/96 001185 CALIFORNIA ASSN PARKS A SEM: CPRS WRKSHP-S.NELSON 8/21 190-180-999-5260 10.00 50.00
30485 08/08/96 000484 CALIFORNIA ASSOC LOCAL CF:CALED-HILLBERG 9/19-20 280-199-999-5261 96.00 96.00
30486 08/08/96 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS SMI FEES COLLECTED 2ND QTR 96 001-2280 628.16
30486 08/08/96 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS SMI FEES COLLECTED 2ND QTR 96 001-2290 2,928.27
30486 08/08/96 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CITY'S 5% OF SMI FEES QTR 2 96 001-162-4229 177.82- 3,378.61
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BROWN, PATRICIA 04/12/95 300-199-999-5205 74.00
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. RANDALL KAREN & CARR 12/02/94 300-199-999-5205 626.90
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. ORTEGA, KAREN 11/16/95 300-199-999-5205 662.40
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. MATTHEWS, MICHAEL 06/25/95 300-199-999-5205 13.88
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. SEGOVIA, WILLIAM 08/14/95 300-199-999-5205 13.88
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. PETCH, LISA 02/08/96 300-199-999-5205 93.88
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. MORENO, ESPERANZA 03/15/96 300-199-999-5205 50.88
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. GAY, GREG 03/25/96 300-199-999-5205 23.13
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BADDEN, SHEILA 04/06/96 300-199-999-5205 346.53
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. LOCKHEED 03/21/96 300-199-999-5205 477.40
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. VARELA, JONATHON 04/28/96 300-199-999-5205 486.18
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. PRATT, ALBERT 03/26/96 300-199-999-5205 527.18
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. ROMERO, FRANK 05/11/96 300-199-999-5205 408.30
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BLASCO, DIANA 12/01/95 300-199-999-5205 169.00
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. WHITE MADONNA 04/06/96 300-199-999-5205 162.88
3n487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BEAZLEY, RICK 04/10/96 300-199-999-5205 153.63
7 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. GOMEZ, MICHAEL 03/29/96 300-199-999-5205 135.13
,7 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BRAXTON, CORNELIUS 06/02/96 300-199-999-5205 269.25
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. FINLEY, GABRIELLE 06/03/96 300-199-999-5205 74.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 4
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30487 08/08/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CORONA, CRAIG 03/18/96 300-199-999-5205 107.38 4,875.81
30488 08/08/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 167.52
30488 08/08/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER STREET SIGNS & MISC HARDWARE 001-164-601-5244 568.32 735.84
30489 08/08/96 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC AUG CRC ALARM MONITORING SRVCS 190-182-999-5250 50.00
30489 08/08/96 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC JUL ALARM MONITORING-SEN CNTR 190-181-999-5250 45.00 95.00
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 39.75
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 66.50
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 113.31
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 193-2330 .94
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 213.16
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 165-2330 12.94
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 88.05
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 193-2330 1.59
30490 08/08/96 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 12.94 588.93
30491 08/08/96 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 208.57
30491 08/08/96 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 159.79 .7
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET REPLACE BATTERY POLICE RADIO 001-170-999-5215 80.82
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-170-999-5215 376.50
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-164-604-5250 292.50
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-164-601-5250 447.00
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-163-999-5250 195.00
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-162-999-5250 669.00
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 190-180-999-5250 501.00
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-165-999-5250 181.50
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-110-999-5250 234.00
30492 08/08/96 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 001-171-999-5215 381.00 3,358.32
30493 08/08/96 000155 DAVLIN TAPING OF COUNCIL MEETINGS 001-100-999-5250 805.44
30493 08/08/96 000155 DAVLIN VIDEO TAPES FOR COUNCIL MTGS 001-100-999-5250 98.32
30493 08/08/96 000155 DAVLIN TAPING OF COUNCIL MEETINGS 001-100-999-5250 805.44 1,709.20
30494 08/08/96 DELEON, IRMA REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
30495 08/08/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AMIN 001-2340 15.00
30495 08/08/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADV 001-1180 8.81
30495 08/08/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.81
30495 08/08/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-REV 001-1180 8.39-
30495 08/08/96 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.39 32.62
30496 08/08/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 7/19 LAUFER 001-162-999-5118 1,058.50
30496 08/08/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 7/19 NICHOLS 280-199-602-5801 2,376.00
30496 08/08/96 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 7/19 OPPERMAN 001-162-999-5118 696.00 4,13@ '(1
30497 08/08/96 002455 EMERICK, DONALD TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 56.00
ZE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
j/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30498 08/08/96 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION PLAN CHECK SRVCS FOR JUN 96 001-162-999-5248 4,218.54 4,218.54
30499 08/08/96 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN COUNCIL MEETING REFRESHMETNS 001-100-999-5260 128.32
30499 08/08/96 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN COUNCIL MEETING REFRESHMENTS 001-100-999-5260 129.45 257.77
30500 08/08/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-110-999-5230 8.75
30500 08/08/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 14.00
30500 08/08/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 32.50
30500 08/08/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 210-199-650-5804 13.50
30500 08/08/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5277 33.15 101.90
30501 08/08/96 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 100-164-601-5250 90.00
30501 08/08/96 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 001-150-999-5250 538.55
30501 08/08/96 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M CREDIT:EMPLOYEE NOT CITY'S 001-150-999-5250 98.00- 530.55
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 591.61
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 7.65
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 124.11
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 .43
-zO5O2 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 1.28
12 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2360 16.16
08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 8.90
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 8.50
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 4.24
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 8.50
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 8.50
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 19.12
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 1,009.82
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 16.16
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 195.67
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 .72
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 1.79
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 23.64
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 11.04
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 280-2380 17.67
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 7.08
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 18.52
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 6.89
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 22.83
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 1,051.78
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 165-2500 17.09
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 205.87
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 .77
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 1.89
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 25.02
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 11.68
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 280-2500 18.70
-@0502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 7.49
'2 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 320-2500 19.59
j2 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 330-2500 7.29
30502 08/08/96 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 340-2500 24.16 3,522.16
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 6
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30504 08/08/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 26.34
30504 08/08/96 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MISC. SUPPLIES - STREET MAINT 001-164-601-5218 31.00 57.34
30505 08/08/96 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN REFILL 95/96 CALENDAR 001-140-999-5220 36.04 36.04
30506 08/08/96 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS SEM:INTERNET-D.UBNOSKE 9/19 001-161-999-5261 69.00 69.00
30507 08/08/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-308-1079/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 53.46
30507 08/08/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-0128/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 1,238.48 1,291.94
30508 08/08/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD AUG RENT CITY YARD 001-164-601-5234 440.00
30508 08/08/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD AUG RENT CITY YARD 190-180-999-5234 352.00
30508 08/08/96 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD AUG RENT CITY YARD 001-162-999-5234 88.00 880.00
30509 08/08/96 GARCIA, LYDIA REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 190-183-4982 20.00 2C.00
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 132.90
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 6.22
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 14.84
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 14.28
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 7.58
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. MISC BINDING SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 11.35
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 14.45
30510 08/08/96 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORP. TAX 330-199-999-5220 15.63 217.25
30511 08/08/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PHASE I ENV SITE ASSESSMENT 210-190-151-5804 1,800.00 1,800.00
30512 08/08/96 GETTY, DEBORAH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 30.00
30512 08/08/96 GETTY, DEBORAH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 30.00 60.00
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 150.47
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 64.81
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - RDA 280-199-999-5220 149.84
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 280-199-999-5220 11.61
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 53.44
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR TCSD - 190-180-999-5220 22.55
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 23.69
30513 08/08/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT:S/B CHARGED TO RVSD CO. 001-170-999-5220 56.57- 419.84
30514 08/08/96 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH OUTPUT FILM CAMERA READY 280-199-999-5270 210.11 210.11
30515 08/08/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, APR ALARM MONITORING YARD 001-162-999-5250 8.75
30515 08/08/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, APR ALARM MONITORING YARD 190-180-999-5250 30.75
30515 08/08/96 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, APR ALARM MONITORING YARD 100-164-601-5250 37.76 77.26
30516 08/08/96 000520 H D L COREN & CONE, INC DTT AUDIT FINDINGS FY 95-96 001-140-999-5248 50.49 50.49
30517 08/08/96 002425 HALCYON BUSINESS PUBLIC AREA DEV MAG. 5/15 ADVERTISING 280-199-999-5254 3,769.75 3,769 75
30518 08/08/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5242 17.18
E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30519 08/08/96 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 507.20 507.20
30520 08/08/96 HAWKINS, LEONARD REFUND:PARK RENTALS 190-183-4988 80.00 80.00
30521 08/08/96 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR. 001-170-999-5214 17.48 17.48
30522 08/08/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,761.48
30522 08/08/96 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 520.21
30522 08/08/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193-2080 7.13
30522 08/08/96 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 27.99 2,316.81
30523 08/08/96 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 296.31 296.31
30524 08/08/96 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 291.35 291.35
30525 08/08/96 000501 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP:J. GREEK 96-97 001-120-999-5226 90.00
30525 08/08/96 000501 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP:S.JONES 96-97 001-120-999-5226 50.00 140.00
30526 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, 80 CASES OF COPY PAPER 330-199-999-5220 1,098.00
7n526 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, 22 CASES OF COLORED PAPER 330-199-999-5220 822.36
6 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, 90 LB. BLUE INDEX PAPER 330-199-999-5220 39.14
-6 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, 28 LB WHITE LASER PAPER 330-199-999-5220 65.08
30526 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, TAX 330-199-999-5220 156.90
30526 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, 40 CASES OF COPY PAPER 330-199-999-5220 1,098.00
30526 08/08/96 002419 JDL PACKAGING SYSTEMS, TAX 330-199-999-5220 85.10 3,364.58
30527 08/08/96 000860 JOCHUM, LORI REISSUE CK#26373 CLASS EARNING 190-183-999-5330 84.00 84.00
30528 08/08/96 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP U.S. FLAG FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 137.00
30528 08/08/96 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP CAL. STATE FLAG FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 166.60
30528 08/08/96 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP FREIGHT 340-199-701-5212 5.00
30528 08/08/96 002421 JON'S FLAG SHOP TAX 340-199-701-5212 23.53 332.13
30529 08/08/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES ENG PLAN CHECK SRVCS - JUL 001-163-999-5249 4,305.00
30529 08/08/96 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES WORKERS COMP. INV. #96-21 001-1182 88.85- 4,216.15
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7/21 EVANS 001-164-604-5118 124.79
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7121 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 124.79
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7/21 EVANS 001-165-999-5118 124.82
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7/28 EVANS 001-164-604-5118 83.19
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7/28 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 83.19
30530 08/08/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 7/28 EVANS 001-165-999-5118 83.22 624.00
30531 08/08/96 KEMPER LUMBERMANS PROP REFUND:TCSD FEES FY95/96 190-180-999-5375 3,020.93 3,020.93
30532 08/08/96 000206 KINKOIS OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 13.95
30532 08/08/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 78.23 92.18
08/08/96 001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 37.83 37.83
30534 08/08/96 000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. DAY CAMP TRIP - S.D. ICE ARENA 190-183-999-5340 333.90 333.90
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30535 08/08/96 000688 LO-FAT CYCLES REPAIR/MAINT OF POLICE BICYCLE 001-170-999-5326 17.55
30535 08/08/96 000688 LO-FAT CYCLES TAX 001-170-999-5326 1.36 18.91
30536 08/08/96 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMIS VIDEO:CENTER FOR LIVABLE COMM. 001-161-999-5228 25.00 25.00
30537 08/08/96 MELLINO, ROSEMARY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
30538 08/08/96 002433 METROTECH EMERG ELECT REPAIR @ DUCK POND 210-190-143-5804 901.66 901.66
30539 08/08/96 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, I PURCHASE ORDER FORMS 001-140-999-5222 923.60
30539 08/08/96 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, I FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 21.76
30539 08/08/96 000448 MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, I TAX 001-140-999-5222 71.58 1,016.94
30540 08/08/96 001394 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 34.24
30540 08/08/96 001394 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL FLOOR MACHINE MAINT & REPAIRS 190-182-999-5250 452.55 486.79
30541 08/08/96 NICHOLS, KATHY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 15.00 15.00
30542 08/08/96 001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL BASKETBALL ASSIGNMENT FEES 190-183-999-5380 296.00 296.00
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES REQUEST PROPOSAL: RFQ MOVERS 001-120-999-5256 34.17
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES INVITING BIDS: PW95-02 CSD 001-120-999-5256 144.16
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE OF ELECTION 001-120-999-5256 10.99
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES INVITING BIDS: NIB PW96-10 001-120-999-5256 164.53
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES REQUEST PROPOSAL:RFQ SOFTBALL 001-120-999-5256 27.51
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES NOTICE OF ORDINANCE:NOA 96-15 001-120-999-5256 19.08
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING: PA96-0132 001-120-999-5256 31.95
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES 4TH OF JULY AD RUN JUN 19 & 25 190-180-999-5254 212.49
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES 4TH OF JULY AD:RUN DATE 6/30 190-180-999-5254 450.00
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES STATE PARK GRAND OPENING AD 190-180-999-5254 97.32
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES ROAD CONST UPDATES JUN 9 & 23 001-165-999-5256 162.20
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES HOST COMM REPUBLICAN NATL ADS 280-199-999-5254 225.64
30543 08/08/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES RECRUITMENT AD-COMM DEVEL TECH 001-150-999-5254 35.20 1,615.24
30544 08/08/96 001704 OLD TOWN TEMECULA MAIN CREDIT-ALCOHOLIC IS NOT REJMB. 280-199-999-5270 47.75-
30544 08/08/96 001704 OLD TOWN TEMECULA MAIN REIMB-POW WOW FAM TOUR 6/13/96 280-199-999-5270 1,291.66 1,243.91
30545 08/08/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 80.68
30545 08/08/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 171.09
30545 08/08/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 23.56 275.33
30546 08/08/96 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER 2 TYPEWRITER REPAIR - FINANCE 001-140-999-5242 130.00 130.00
30547 08/08/96 002219 ORYX, INC UNDER PAID FOR ECON DEV BOOK 280-199-999-52Z8 10.55 10.55
30548 08/08/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY COUNCIL 001-100-999-5248 598.99
30548 08/08/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. THIRD-PARTY CONSULTATION SERVS 001-150-999-5250 620.90
30548 08/08/96 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY COUNCIL 001-100-999-5248 901.01 2,1?' 00
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-163-999-5250 15.00
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-164-601-5238 15.00
72 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
U, /96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-165-999-5238 7.50
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-164-604-5208 7.50
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-120-999-5250 7.50
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 320-199-999-5238 21.78
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 190-180-999-5250 75.00
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-162-999-5238 37.50
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-170-999-5242 70.00
30549 08/08/96 001561 PAGENET AUG 96 PAGING SERV 001-100-999-5250 15.00 271.78
30550 08/08/96 002454 PAPER SHOWCASE IVORY LINEN PAPER, PACK OF 3 001-120-999-5220 56.00
30550 08/08/96 002454 PAPER SHOWCASE IVORY LINEN PAPER 50 PKS OF 3 001-120-999-5220 380.00 436.00
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 289.68
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 190-2130 3.34
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 280-2130 1.00
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 15,125.89
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 240.14
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 31092.23
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 11.02
7n951 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 27.30
1 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 367.24
,1 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 171.60
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 263.24
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 103.49
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 292.08
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 115.60
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 342.77
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 68.09
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 .84
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 13.58
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .05
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .14
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.77
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .97
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93
30551 08/08/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.09 20,537.39
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 536.75
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 113.52
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 113.52
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 404.91
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 .84
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 280-2090 .25
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 574.14
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.26
08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 5,308.45
08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,936.24
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 191-2090 14.80
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 0
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 192-2090 29.60
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 222.00
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 29.60
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 38.48
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 296.00
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 378.21
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 2,006.46
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 352.01
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 193-2090 14.15
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 70.77
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 2,374.67
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 190-2090 305.70
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 192-2090 15.68
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 193-2090 78.39
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 194-2090 321.37
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 2,444.10
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 190-2090 1.37
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 280-2090 .41
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 001-2090 772.24
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 001-2090 95.35
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 1,334.54
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE COBRA BENEFITS 001-1180 73.50
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 24.00
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 88.42
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 88.42
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 250.21
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 41.13
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 19.20
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 3.68
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 001-2090 18.79
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 190-2090 97.36
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 193-2090 6.95
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 340-2090 34.78
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 001-2090 187.60
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 001-2090 48.79
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV 001-2090 926.38-
30552 08/08/96 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 001-2090 17.05 20,296.28
30553 08/08/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-165-999-5230 15.00
30553 08/08/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 38.35
30553 08/08/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 280-199-999-5230 19.40
30553 08/08/96 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 53.90 126.65
30554 08/08/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN SKATE PARK GRAND OPENING ADVER 190-180-999-5254 96.00
30554 08/08/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN SKATE PARK GRAND OPENING 190-180-999-5254 72.00
30554 08/08/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN AD FOR MURRIETAIS BIRTHDAY 001-120-999-5254 440.00
30554 08/08/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PLANNING COMM POSTION ADVERTIS 001-120-999-5254 67.50
30554 08/08/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION UPDATES 001-165-999-5256 108.00 7P'z rO
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 001-2340 2,289.40
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 165-2340 32.09
ZE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11
j/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 190-2340 350.24
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 193-2340 3.21
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 280-2340 32.08
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 300-2340 16.03
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 330-2340 24.32
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 340-2340 80.21
30555 08/08/96 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA/AUG 1996 001-1180 137.13 2,964.71
30556 08/08/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVS-SKATE PRK 190-180-999-5212 188.79
30556 08/08/96 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVS-TCSD 190-180-999-5212 24.78 213.57
30557 08/08/96 000546 RADIO SHACK MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 94.72 94.72
30558 08/08/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 6TH STREET BLUEPRINTS 280-199-804-5802 43.52 43.52
30559 08/08/96 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RELOCATE METER SERV-SAM HICK 280-199-805-5802 920.56 920.56
30560 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & DETAIL 001-165-999-5214 4.00
30560 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-162-999-5214 32.00
-n560 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-162-999-5263 20.55
50 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 190-180-999-5214 32.00
,60 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5214 4.00
30560 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5263 14.55
30560 08/08/96 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-163-999-5214 27.23 134.33
30561 08/08/96 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW POSITION 001-120-999-5256 75.00 75.00
30562 08/08/96 002457 RANCHO RUNNERS EXPRESS SERV-RICHARDS WATSON 300-199-999-5207 105.00
30562 08/08/96 002457 RANCHO RUNNERS EXPRESS SERVS-CARL WARREN OFFI 300-199-999-5207 60.00 165.00
30563 08/08/96 002400 REBEL TEMECULA 6 FLOOD LIGHT TRIPOD RENTAL 280-199-999-5250 180.00
30563 08/08/96 002400 REBEL TEMECULA DUMP TRUCK RENTAL FOR PW 001-164-601-5238 560.33
30563 08/08/96 002400 REBEL TEMECULA 6 FLOOD LIGHTS TRIPOD RENTAL 280-199-999-5250 180.00
30563 08/08/96 002400 REBEL TEMECULA 6 FLOOD LIGHT TRIPOD 280-199-999-5250 180.00 1,100.33
30564 08/08/96 000266 RIGHTWAY TOILET RENTAL @ RIVERTON PARK 190-180-999-5238 62.89
30564 08/08/96 000266 RIGHTWAY TOILETS RENTAL @ NICOLAS RD PR 190-180-999-5238 172.50
30564 08/08/96 000266 RIGHTWAY TOILETS RENTAL @ DUCK POND 190-180-999-5238 37.79- 197.60
30565 08/08/96 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING CIT. ASSMNTS 95/96 001-2260 2,455.00
30565 08/08/96 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING CIT. ASSMNTS 95/96 001-2265 1,100.00 3,555.00
30566 08/08/96 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME PERMIT:PALA COMM PARK 39309 190-180-999-5250 65.00
30566 08/08/96 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME PERMIT:PALA COMM PARK 39310 190-180-999-5250 65.00 130.00
30567 08/08/96 000411 RIVERSIDE CO. FLOOD CON ENCROACHMENT PERMIT:WINCH BRDG 280-199-602-5804 600.00 600.00
'KO568 08/08/96 000268 RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT K-RAT PMT FOR JUNE 96 001-2300 7,493.50 7,493.50
j9 08/08/96 001888 SHAFER, AMBER DAWN TCSD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 190-183-999-5330 878.40 878.40
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 2
08/OB/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30570 08/08/96 SHARP, CHRIS REFUND-MENS SOFTBALL LEAGUE 190-183-4994 10.00 10.00
30571 08/08/96 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CRC PEST CNTRL SERVS-JULY 190-182-999-5250 42.00 42.00
30572 08/08/96 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON TRFFC SGNL 79S/6477-4040 64093 210-165-658-5804 666.24 666.24
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-03-603-0070 MCCABE 190-180-999-5240 2,038.89
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-4946 6TH STREET 190-180-999-5240 1,301.20
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-05-284-5435 DE PORTOLA IRR 193-180-999-5240 15.52
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5489 FRONT ST 001-164-601-5240 90.74
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6289 BUSINESSPARK DR 340-199-701-5240 34.85
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-7345 MONIQUE CRCL IRR 193-180-999-5240 14.54
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-7790 RANCHO VISTA SPR 193-180-999-5240 15.36
30573 08/08/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-03-755-8053 AVENIDA DE MISS] 193-180-999-5240 16.50 3,527.60
30574 08/08/96 001576 STEWARD COMPANY, THE MARK 3 PAPER DRILL 330-199-999-5242 625.50
30574 08/08/96 001576 STEWARD COMPANY, THE 3/8 IN. DRILL BITS 330-199-999-5242 51.90
30574 08/08/96 001576 STEWARD COMPANY, THE FREIGHT 330-199-999-5242 14.95
30574 08/08/96 001576 STEWARD COMPANY, THE TAX 330-199-999-5242 52.50 744.85
30575 08/08/96 002430 STRICKLAND, KATIE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 32.00
30576 08/08/96 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS LGE ICE PACKS FOR FIRST AID 190-180-999-5301 60.00
30576 08/08/96 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS TAX 190-180-999-5301 4.65 64.65
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 385.73
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 165-2125 7.40
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 92.50
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 .92
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 1.85
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 13.88
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 1.85
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 9.25
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.62
30577 08/08/96 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 18.50 536.50
30578 08/08/96 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVS @ THE CRC 190-180-999-5212 47.00 47.00
30579 08/08/96 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES 001-2170 189.85 189.85
30580 08/08/96 002456 TEMECULA VALLEY GOLF FE SPONSORSHIP TEM VLY GOLF FESTL 001-100-999-5285 2,500.00 2,500.00
30581 08/08/96 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & MISC HARDWARE & MAINT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 38.93 38.93
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 10.00
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 3,975.50
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 166.30
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 596.66
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 9.99
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 166.30
30582 08/08/96 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 50.00 4,974.75
E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 13
/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDDR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30583 08/08/96 000697 TDWN AFFILIATION ASSOCI ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-100-999-5280 380.00 380.00
30584 08/08/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS TRANSCRIBER FOR PLANNING DEPT 001-161-999-5242 220.00
30584 08/08/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 70.87 290.87
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 203.30
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.28
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 .30
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 1.64
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 4.20
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .68
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 203.30-
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 164.20
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 32.28
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510 .30
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 1.64
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 4.20
30585 08/08/96 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 .68 406.60
6 08/08/96 000826 TRAVEL TRUST AIR:CMBTA:SMITH,Z:10/30-11/2 001-140-999-5258 52.00
36 08/08/96 000826 TRAVEL TRUST AIR:CMBTA:SMITH,Z:10/30-11/2 001-140-999-5258 28.00 80.00
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 2,867.62
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 72.39
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 750.86
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 1.25
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 13.75
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 194-2080 22.49
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 72.39
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 5.00
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 312.50
30587 08/08/96 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 87.50 4,205.75
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 1,119.40
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PESSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 18.90
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 1,510.16
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PESSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 45.88
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 110.92
30588 08/08/96 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 150.00 2,955.26
30589 08/08/96 002222 U S D A FOREST SERVICE FIRE PREVENTION-THEME STICKERS 001-171-999-5296 47.14
30589 08/08/96 002222 U S D A FOREST SERVICE FIRE PREVENTION-PENCILS 001-171-999-5296 220.00 267.14
30590 08/08/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 001-2120 76.10
30590 08/08/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 165-2120 1.20
30590 08/08/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 190-2120 15.00
3nsgo 08/08/96 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 uw 280-2120 1.20 93.50
1 08/08/96 000854 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE BOOK:TRNSPRT-GROWTH:MYTH/FACT 001-100-999-5228 17.45 17.45
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 4
08/08/96 14:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30592 08/08/96 VERANO, ROXANA REFUND-TENNIS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00
30593 08/08/96 001437 VIRACK, MARYANN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 128.00 128.00
30594 08/08/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 321.81
30594 08/08/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 215.07 536.88
30595 08/08/96 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CALIF CODE PUB FOR CITY HALL 001-120-999-5228 69.65 69.65
30596 08/08/96 002097 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT SPECIAL HOT TAPE FOR SKATE PRK 210-190-137-5802 189.67
30596 08/08/96 002097 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT TAX 210-190-137-5802 14.70 204.37
30597 08/08/96 002109 WHITE CAP MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 25.63 25.63
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE/VOL MAINT #5343CAS 330-199-999-5239 397.21
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI BLACK DRY INK 330-199-999-5220 101.00
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CYAN,YELLOW,MAGENTA DRY INK 330-199-999-5Z2O 363.00
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI DEVELOPER FOR COLOR COPIER 330-199-999-5220 384.00
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI FUSER AGENT 330-199-999-5220 71.00
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI WASTE TONER BOTTLE 330-199-999-5220 20.00
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 330-199-999-5220 72.78
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI AUG LEASE PMT ON 5100 COPIER 330-199-999-5239 3,469.14
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX 330-199-999-5239 268.86
30598 08/08/96 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI AUG LEASE FOR COPIER @ THE CRC 190-182-999-5239 117.84 5,264.83
30599 08/08/96 000346 YATES, GRANT RE-ISSUE/EMERG COMM+FIRE LUNCH 001-110-999-5278 79.00 79.00
TOTAL CHECKS 208,353.16
--2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
6,. /96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 14,344.89
100 GAS TAX FUND 960.00
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 220.00
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 26,250.18
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 7,914.44
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 21,987.92
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 4,245.14
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 1,319.10
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 7,763.42
300 INSURANCE FUND 932.62
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 10,450.71
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 17.13
340 FACILITIES 957.53
TOTAL 97,363.08
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/15/96 12:10 VOIJCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30602 08/15/96 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 8/1 WILLIAMS 001-161-999-5118 144.48 144.48
30603 08/15/96 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 210.66 210.66
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS MISC SPORTS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 12.00
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 4.70
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 4.00
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 9.50
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 11.50
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 21.00
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 8.50
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 4.20
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 4.20
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 12.60
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS SPORT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 4.20
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS FREIGHT 190-183-999-5320 2.31
30604 08/15/96 000122 B S N SPORTS TAX 190-183-999-5320 7.47 106.18
30605 08/15/96 BROGDEN, VERONICA REFUND:TEEN PROGRAMS 190-183-4980 30.00 30.00
30606 08/15/96 001590 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN CF:LEGAL ISSUES-RUIZ 8/28-29 165-199-999-5261 220.00 2
30607 08/15/96 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. MILLER, CHARLES 01/06/95 300-199-999-5205 31.75 31.75
30608 08/15/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TRAIL SIGNS/SANTA GERTRUDIS 190-180-999-5244 174.48
30608 08/15/96 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 190-180-999-5244 13.52 188.00
30609 08/15/96 001555 CHRISTOPHERSON FIRE PRO FIRE SYSTEM TESTING FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 65.00 65.00
30610 08/15/96 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION PARTS & EQUIPMENT 190-180-999-5212 867.44 867.44
30611 08/15/96 001275 COMPUSERVE, INC. COMPUTER INFO SERVICE 320-199-999-5228 9.95 9.95
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI CREDIT:NEWSLETTER/RACK BROCHUR 280-199-999-5270 2,857.18-
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI CREDIT:RACK BROCHURE PHASE 1 280-199-999-5270 500.00-
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI CREDIT:MEDIA FAM TOUR 280-199-999-5270 464.80-
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI JUNE RDA MARKETING SERVS 280-199-999-5270 6,739-73
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI JUN RDA MARKETING SRVCS 280-199-999-5270 1,301.60
30612 08/15/96 002239 COOPER & VOCHELLI JUN RDA MARKETING SRVCS 280-199-999-5270 1,177.30 5,396.65
30613 08/15/96 000155 DAVLIN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS 001-161-999-5250 153.34 153.34
30614 08/15/96 002382 DEL RIO CONTRACTORS EMERG. ST. REPAIR-PALA RD 001-164-601-5402 1,500.00 1,500.00
30615 08/15/96 002171 DIVERSIFIED COMMUNICATI ENG SRVCS FOR RADIO SYSTEM 320-199-999-5248 937.50 937.50
@E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
L,-,,.)/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30616 08/15/96 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIEGO DR LDSC WATER SRVC-AUG 193-180-999-5240 947.06 947.06
30617 08/15/96 002148 EXPRESS TEL JUL LONG DISTANCE MONTHLY SRVC 320-199-999-5208 6.52 6.52
30618 08/15/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230 49.50
30618 08/15/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 210-199-650-5804 51.25
30618 08/15/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 27.75 128.50
30619 08/15/96 FEDERICO, ANTONIO REFUND-BUSINESS LICENSE FEE 001-199-4056 35.00 35.00
30620 08/15/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN KEYVIEW 1 YR WARRANTY EXT 320-199-999-5215 720.00
30620 08/15/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN NET-911 1 YR WARRANTY EXT 320-199-999-5215 180.00 900.00
30621 08/15/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-694-6400/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 744.65
30621 08/15/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-695-1409/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 412.37
30621 08/15/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-695-3539/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 37.09
30621 08/15/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-1370/COP CABOOSE-JUL 001-170-999-5208 109.41
30621 08/15/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA PAYM 909-699-2309/GENERAL USAGE/JUL 320-199-999-5208 31.55 1,335.07
'n622 08/15/96 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. JUL ACCESS-OPEN LINE -CRC 320-199-999-5208 350.20
'2 08/15/96 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. JUL ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 305.18 655.38
30623 08/15/96 GALIZIA, LISA REFUND:SWIMMING LESSONS 190-183-4975 18.00 18.00
30624 08/15/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL TEMECULA PD MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS 001-170-999-5214 25.00
30624 08/15/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL TEMECULA PD MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS 001-170-999-5214 100.00 125.00
30625 08/15/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 114.25
30625 08/15/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE DEPT. 001-140-999-5220 58.48
30625 08/15/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE DEPT. 001-140-999-5220 51.18
30625 08/15/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE DEPT. 001-140-999-5220 6.24
30625 08/15/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT:OFFICE SUPPLIES RETURND 001-150-999-5220 30.17- 199.98
30626 08/15/96 002374 GOVERNMENT INTERFACE, L JUL CONSULT SRVCS-CITY PROJECT 001-164-604-5248 1,000.00 1,000.00
30627 08/15/96 002436 GREG COOPES PLUMBING ROTATE DRINKING FOUNTAIN-SK PK 210-190-137-5802 100.00 100.00
30628 08/15/96 002336 H H R C EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 001-150-999-5250 348.45 348.45
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SPORTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5380 107.66
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR TCSD 340-199-701-5212 11.16
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SPORTS PARK - PARKING LIGHT 190-180-999-5212 349.90
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. TAX 190-180-999-5212 27.12
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 121.60
30629 08/15/96 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 325.25 942.69
30630 08/15/96 002223 HEMET RUBBER STAMP FIRE PREVENTION TRAINING SUPP. 001-171-999-5296 36.08 36.08
1 08/15/96 000193 1 C M A SOFTWARE REFERENCE GUIDE 1996 320-199-999-5228 129.00
,1 08/15/96 000193 1 C M A FREIGHT 320-199-999-5228 6.00 135.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 3
08/15/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30632 08/15/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES 320-199-999-5250 1,435.00
30632 08/15/96 001429 INACOM INFORMATION SYST NETWORK CLIENT SERVICES 320-199-999-5250 600.00 2,035.00
30633 08/15/96 002465 INLAND EMPIRE CALIF STA IEP STATE FAIR CONTIBUTION 280-199-999-5270 500.00 500.00
30634 08/15/96 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212 308.17 308.17
30635 08/15/96 JACKSON, DEMARCO & PECK REFUND:OVERPAID-MAPS,T.M.CODE 001-199-4060 67.00 67.00
30636 08/15/96 JAMES, CHERYL REFUND:TEEN PROGRAMS 190-183-4980 30.00 30.00
30637 08/15/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 8/4 EVANS 001-164-604-5118 110.92
30637 08/15/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 8/4 EVANS 001-163-999-5118 110.92
30637 08/15/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 8/4 EVANS 001-165-999-5118 110.96 332.80
30638 08/15/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 47.30
30638 08/15/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5220 94.60
30638 08/15/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5223 185.46
30638 08/15/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 17.13 344.49
30639 08/15/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE AUG LASER PRINTER MAINT 320-199-999-5250 409.17
30639 08/15/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE JUL LASER PRINTER MAINT 320-199-999-5250 409.17
30639 08/15/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE SEPT LASER PRINTER MAINT 320-199-999-5250 409.17
30639 08/15/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE HP LASERJET TONER REFURB 320-199-999-5221 440.00
30639 08/15/96 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE TAX 320-199-999-5221 34.10 1,701.61
30640 08/15/96 001269 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE MEMBERSHIP 96-97 ERC SAN DIEGO 001-150-999-5226 156.06 156.06
30641 08/15/96 002462 LUSTRE-CAL NAMEPLATE CO TT100-1000/IND BLUE PROP TAGS 001-140-999-5220 576.42 576.42
30642 08/15/96 002011 MARTIN, KATHY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 364.00 364.00
30643 08/15/96 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT ETHERLINK-NETWORK CARDS 320-199-999-5221 780.00
30643 08/15/96 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 320-199-999-5221 60.45
30643 08/15/96 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 336.18 1,176.63
30644 08/15/96 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 93.41 93.41
30645 08/15/96 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING VIA LOBO CHANNEL WTR W/TRUCK 100-164-601-5401 960.00 960.00
30646 08/15/96 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. MASTER/DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD 001-120-999-5277 28.02 28.02
30647 08/15/96 000437 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES 1995-96 AUDIT SERVICES (CITY) 001-140-999-5248 358.75
30647 08/15/96 000437 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX AUDITS 001-140-999-5248 485.00 843.75
30648 08/15/96 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPARE CHRGES TO PARCEL RATES 190-180-999-5370 4,000.00 4,000.00
30649 08115/96 002101 MY BUDDIES PIZZA IN-HOUSE STAFF MTG REFRESHMNTS 190-180-999-5260 41.80
30650 08/15/96 N J P SPORTS, INC. MISC SUPPLIES FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5301 35.09
-z 2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
0@,/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30651 08/15/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC NOTICES PA95-0047 001-161-999-5256 44.08
30651 08/15/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES INVITING BIDS PW95-26 001-120-999-5256 130.19
30651 08/15/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES INVITING BIDS AD PW96-11 001-120-999-5256 133.25
30651 08/15/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES INVITING BIDS AD PW96-08 001-120-999-5256 136.32
30651 08/15/96 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES PUBLIC HEARING CHPT 17.28 001-120-999-5256 31.95 475.79
30652 08/15/96 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE TIRES FOR B&S VEHICLES 001-162-999-5214 271.43 271.43
30653 08/15/96 002156 OLYMPIA MORTGAGE CORP. RE-ISSUE CK:SALES TAX ASSISTAN 280-199-999-5276 206.86 206.86
30654 08/15/96 002398 PALOMAR COMMUNICATIONS AUG DISPATCH RADIO SERV 320-199-999-5209 600.00 600.00
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5214 6.00
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 17.76
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5260 12.00
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5220 8.09
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 15.86
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 25.00
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-120-999-5230 1.06
"<55 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5301 41.24
5 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-165-999-5260 27.61
j5 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5208 10.48
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 47.51
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 3.09
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-604-5220 40.63
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 8.37
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 320-199-999-5230 33.85
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-604-5260 2.50
30655 08/15/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5260 16.00 317.05
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-110-999-5223 26.03
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-163-999-5250 8.38
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 17.14
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 280-199-999-5250 22.24
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR CIP 001-165-999-5250 40.96
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-999-5222 10.73
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-110-999-5223 39.54
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 62.84
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 280-199-999-5250 18.02
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 23.67
30656 08/15/96 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 8.89- 260.66
30657 08/15/96 002439 PHOTOMATION PHOTO LAB COLOR ZONING MAP REDUCTION 001-161-999-5224 159.00
30657 08/15/96 002439 PHOTOMATION PHOTO LAB TAX 001-161-999-5224 12.32 171.32
30658 08/15/96 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC., ZONING MAPS-JUL PROF SERVS 001-161-999-5248 163.02
30658 08/15/96 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC., DESIGN LINKS-JUL PROF SERVS 001-161-999-5248 919.75 1,082.77
08/15/96 POTTER, JENNIFER L. AND SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM # 96-178 300-199-999-5207 900.87 900.87
30660 08/15/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADS- HUMAN RES. 001-150-999-5254 490.20
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 5
08/15/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30660 08/15/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN SUBSCRIPT:TCSD 8/11/96-8/09/97 190-180-999-5228 124.80
30660 08/15/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN ROADWAY CONST UPDATE ADS 001-165-999-5256 90.00
30660 08/15/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING AD 001-140-999-5254 135.45
30660 08/15/96 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN SUBSCRIPT:PW 8/7/96-8/5/97 001-164-604-5228 124.80 965.25
30661 08/15/96 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT PALLET JACK RENTAL- PARKS 190-180-999-5238 40.72 40.72
30662 08/15/96 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, I BENCH WIO BACK FOR SKATE PARK 210-190-137-5802 1,148.51 1,148.51
30663 08/15/96 002313 QUINN, SUSAN MEDIATOR -OLD TWN ASSN MTG 280-199-999-5250 1,400.00 1,400.00
30664 08/15/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C CITY MAINT YARD BLUEPRINTS 210-190-144-5802 19.34 19.34
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-29610-0 SR CENTER 190-181-999-5240 10.14
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-29725-0 SR CENTER 190-181-999-5240 106.53
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84300-1 CITY YARD/FRONT 001-164-601-5240 16.42
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240 1,862.59
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 6,616.79
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 196.45
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 3,247.92
30665 08/15/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240 396.09 12,@
30666 08/15/96 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC. COMM SERV FUNDING AD 1/4 PG 001-140-999-5254 140.00 140.00
30667 08/15/96 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET JUL 96 PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 262.50 262.50
30668 08/15/96 002446 ROGERS VIDEO REPAIR CITY HALL VCR REPAIR CHRGES 340-199-701-5250 77.07 77.07
30669 08/15/96 ROSS, DIANA REFUND-SINGING & STAGE PERFORM 190-183-4982 31.00 31.00
30670 08/15/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, CRC SUPPLIES FOR ACTIVITIES 190-183-999-5320 40.35
30670 08/15/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, CRC SUPPLIES FOR ACTIVITIES 190-183-999-5320 7.78 48.13
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263 545.28
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263 81.63
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263 235.04
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5263 26.12
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 190.61
30671 08/15/96 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 392.05 1,470.73
30672 08/15/96 001888 SHAFER, AMBER DAWN TCSD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 190-183-999-5330 316.00 316.00
30673 08/15/96 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA TEM ELE POOL MAINT SERV-JUL 190-180-999-5212 498.40 498.40
30674 08/15/96 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SNACKS FOR DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 111.46 111.46
30675 08/15/96 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CITY HALL PEST CNTL SERV 340-199-701-5250 42.00 42.00
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON VARIOUS ELECT METERS 191-180-999-5319 1,063.14
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-4813 MARGARITA T/C 191-180-999-5319 28.89
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5141 YNEZ TC 1 191-180-999-5319 24.58
:E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
u,,,j/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA 190-182-999-5240 5,589.42
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-03-464-5382 RANCHO VISTA IRR 193-180-999-5240 13.44
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5620 DE PORTOLA 190-180-999-5240 1,650.98
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5836 VIA DEL CORONADO 193-180-999-5240 11.52
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6073 VIA TIO TMCULA 193-180-999-5240 11.52
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6420 VIA CORDOBA IRRG 190-180-999-5240 55.53
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6800 YNEZ RD PED 191-180-999-5240 13.44
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-6982 VIA REINA IRR 193-180-999-5240 13.68
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 192-180-999-5319 21,987.92
30676 08/15/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 6,587.94 37,052.00
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4769 JS 001-100-999-5208 33.36
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4204 KL 001-100-999-5208 28.78
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4763 Ps 001-100-999-5208 29.70
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4758 RR 001-100-999-5208 33.53
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-4070 MJM 001-110-999-5208 111.39
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4770 RB 001-110-999-5208 33.05
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4757 iG 001-120-999-5208 31.79
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-7826 GR 001-140-999-5208 50.21
--677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-5153 GY 001-150-999-5208 125.26
'7 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4767 GT 001-161-999-5208 37.96
,77 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4760 JH 001-163-999-5208 143.16
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 203-9994 BB 001-164-601-5208 65.68
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4764 BB-PW BLAZER 001-164-601-5208 37.73
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-8688 PW EOC 001-164-604-5208 76.37
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5208 42.55
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 206-0992 BH 190-180-999-5208 36.00
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4755 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 26.95
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-9876 HP 190-180-999-5208 34.36
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4754 KH 190-180-999-5208 66.51
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-212-0934 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 32.61
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-7877 EOC 320-199-999-5208 40.15
30677 08/15/96 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4756 KRTM UNASSIGNED 320-199-999-5208 289.73
30677 08/15196 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 519-2136 TH 320-199-999-5208 33.58 1,440.41
30678 08/15/96 000293 STADIUM PIZZA PIZZA PARTY FOR DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 68.60 68.60
30679 08/15/96 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SURVIVAL FANNY PACKS 001-162-999-5242 163.36
30679 08/15/96 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SURVIVAL FANNY PACKS 001-162-999-5242 61.26
30679 08/15/96 002150 SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SURVIVAL FANNY PACKS 001-1170 490.03 714.65
30680 08/15/96 SYKES, LINDA REFUND-KRAFTY KIDS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00
30681 08/15/96 001497 T R W,INC.-INFORMATION CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS 280-199-999-5250 50.00 50.00
30682 08/15/96 000308 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI DONATION-MEMORY OF B.PEARSON 001-100-999-5285 50.00 50.00
--683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. BATTERS BOX TEMPLATE 190-183-999-5380 140.00
3 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. LINE MATE 190-183-999-5380 63.00
33 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. WHITE SAF-T-SLIDER BASES 190-183-999-5380 390.00
30683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. DRIVER TOOL 190-183-999-5380 100.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/15/96 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. CH ANCHOR-FEMALE RED 190-183-999-5380 162.00
30683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. DIGOUT TOOL FOR GROUND ANCHOR 190-183-999-5380 11.50
30683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-999-5380 81.93
30683 08/15/96 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-183-999-5380 67.15 1,015.58
30684 08/15/96 002452 TOP LINE TEMECULA SANDBLASTER PRESSURE HOSE 001-164-601-5218 112.51
30684 08/15/96 002452 TOP LINE TEMECULA TAX 001-164-601-5218 8.25 120.76
30685 08/15/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 176.41
30685 08/15/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 93.00 269.41
30686 08/15/96 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO 4TH QTR CITIZEN EMERG RESPONSE 001-2030 1,312.50 1,312.50
30687 08/15/96 002396 U.S. LONG DISTANCE JUL LONG DISTANCE CHRGES 320-199-999-5208 670.15 670.15
30688 08/15/96 002461 UNDERGROUND SHORING SPE AWARENESS SEM:10-19:HODSON,J. 001-163-999-5261 75.00
30688 08/15/96 002461 UNDERGROUND SHORING SPE AWARENESS SEM:10-19:MANGUSING 001-163-999-5261 75.00 150.00
30689 08/15/96 000854 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP:THORNHILL,G #35248 001-161-999-5226 145.00 145.00
30690 08/15/96 WANNASOOPPON, SORAYA REFUND-MAGIC MOUTAIN TRIP 190-183-4980 30.00
30691 08/15/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 133.61
30691 08/15/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 131.24
30691 08/15/96 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BDLG MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 220.55 485.40
30692 08/15/96 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CA CODES BOOKS-CITY HALL 001-120-999-5228 69.90 69.90
TOTAL CHECKS 97,363.08
E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
/96 12:56 VC)UCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 912,009.19
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 90.75
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 5,117.39
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 546,740.23
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 172,595.82
300 INSURANCE FUND 13,326.34
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 21,507.95
TOTAL 1,671,387.67
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/15/96 12:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30694 08/27/96 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA JUL PROF SRVC-SIGNAL DESIGN 210-165-640-5802 15,390.00 15,390.00
30695 08/27/96 001943 B R W, INC. JUN PROF SRVCS -SIGNAL R.CAL 210-165-664-5802 5,126.69 5,126.69
30696 08/27/96 002328 CALIFORNIA TURF TEM DUCK POND AERATION EQUIP,. 210-190-143-5804 7,742.92 7,742.92
30697 08/27/96 002343 CHINO CONSTRUCTION PRGS PMT #1-PCC REPAIRS PW9506 001-164-601-5402 36,066.50
30697 08/27/96 002343 CHINO CONSTRUCTION C/o #1 PW95-06 PCC REPAIRS 001-164-601-5402 290.00
30697 08/27/96 002343 CHINO CONSTRUCTION RET W/H PMT #1 PW95-06 001-2035 3,635.65- 32,720.85
30698 08/27/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN ELECTRONIC SWITCH FOR NETWORK 320-1970 4,700.00
30698 08/27/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN FREIGHT 320-1970 123.20
30698 08/27/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN TAX 320-1970 364.25 5,187.45
30699 08/27/96 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH TOURISM GUIDE BROCHURE 280-199-999-5270 21,660.36 21,660.36
30700 08/27/96 002375 GRE ZEN MARKETING GROUP JUL PROF SRVCS - C.M. OFFICE 001-110-999-5248 5,915.00 5,915.00
30701 08/27/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, PRGS PMT ;V7 PARKVIEW FIRE ST. 210-190-626-5804 107,753.22
30701 08/27/96 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, RET W/H PRGS PMT #7 PARKVIEW 210-2035 10,775.32- 96,97- 10
30702 08/27/96 002397 LANDMARK/CALIFORNIA STA RET TO ESCROW ACCT GREAT WST#7 210-1035 10,775.32 10,7, -
30703 08/27/96 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES CSD ADMIN SERVS-JUL/SEPT 96 190-180-999-5370 5,117.39 5,117.39
30704 08/27/96 001713 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. JUN PRGSS-LST STREET EXTENSION 280-199-807-5802 28,063.06 28,063.06
30705 08/27/96 002404 OMNIDATA IMAGE SCANNER RICOH IS420 320-1970 16,320.50 16,320.50
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 7,399.22
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 207.00
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 671.50
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 3,215.50
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 2,086.25
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 1,267.17
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 282.00
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 515.00
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 459.75
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 661.50
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 25.00
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 155.06
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 2,347.00
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 207.42
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 2,100.98
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-GENERAL 001-2030 8,859.50
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-CLAIMS 300-2030 8,955.61
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-RDA 280-2030 1,040.17
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-LOW MOD 165-2030 90.75
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS JUNE 96 LEGAL SERVS-RDA 280-2030 1,560.42
30706 08/27/96 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS PER CONTRACT-ALLOWED 50 HRS 001-2030 15.00- 42,6.
:-2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
0,,@,/96 12:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S NEW DEPUTY TRAINING CHARGES 001-170-999-5288 21,670.40
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5288 187,521.74
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5299 22,550.00
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5298 19,515.04
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5294 9,334.40
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5290 11,088.00
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5291 1,295.68
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5291 1,619.60
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5281 20,721.09
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5282 2,777.60
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5262 13,862.74
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-170-999-5234 8,680.43
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S K-8 SRO 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-1230 1,295.68
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS SRO 4/11/96-5/8/96 001-1230 1,619.60
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5288 46,422.63-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5299 7,470.45-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5298 4,537.93-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5294 2,444.16-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5290 1,947.88-
---07 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5291 1,009.48-
7 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5291 1,498.43-
j7 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5281 152.89-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 7/1-4/10/96 001-170-999-5282 612.36-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S K-8 SRO RATE ADJT 7/1-1/3/96 001-1230 866.97-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S K-8 SRO RATE ADJT 1/4-4/10/96 001-1230 466.52-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S K-8 RATE ADJT OT 1/4-4/10 001-1230 1.81-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS SRO RATE ADJT 7/1-1/3/96 001-1230 1,038.42-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS SRO RATE ADJT 1/4-4/10/96 001-1230 447.26-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS RATE ADJT OT 7/1-1/3/96 001-1230 7.07-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS RATE ADJT OT 1/4-4/10/96 001-1230 5.67-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5288 188,116.34
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5299 29,735.41
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5298 19,403.80
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5294 8,517.64
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5290 11,088.00
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5291 2,591.36
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5291 3,239.20
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5281 20,707.89
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5282 2,777.60
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5262 14,769.40
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMNT 5/8/96-06/05/96 001-170-999-5234 8,680.43
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS K-8 SRO 5/8/96 - 6/5/96 001-1230 2,591.36
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS SRO 5/8/96 - 6/5/96 001-1230 3,239.20
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S SCAIR PRGM- APRIL/MAY/JUNE 96 001-170-999-5288 7,970.73
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS SCAIR PRGM- APRIL/MAY/JUNE 96 001-170-999-5262 422.28
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS HOT SUMMER NGT-OLD TWN-PATROL 001-170-999-5288 303.12
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5288 165,504.13
7n7O7 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFIS LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5299 26,533.52
08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5298 16,797.56
08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5294 8,286.75
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5290 9,494.10
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 3
08/15/96 12:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5291 2,358.56
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5291 2,186.46
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5281 17,628.81
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5282 2,465.12
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5262 12,852.50
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S LAW ENFORCEMENT 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-170-999-5234 10,929.33
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S FY 95-96 MILEAGE RATE ADJTMNT 001-170-999-5262 2,378.03-
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S K-8 SRO 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-1230 2,358.55
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S HS SRO 6/5/96-6/30/96 001-1230 2,186.46
30707 08/27/96 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S CREDIT FOR FACILITIES CHARGE 001-170-999-5234 8,680.43- 847,299.22
30708 08/27/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGSS-WINCH/1-15 BRIDGE 280-199-602-5804 128,270.75
30708 08/27/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGSS-WINCH/1-15 BRIDGE CO 280-199-602-5804 5,364.59
30708 08/27/96 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION JUL PRGSS-WINCH/1-15 RETENTION 280-2035 13,363.53- 120,271.81
30709 08/27/96 002434 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF TR CO-OP AGMNT SIGNAL/BUTRFD-79S 210-165-676-5804 104,094.90 104,094.90
30710 08/27/96 000818 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC JUL PRGSS-TRAFF SIGNAL PALA 210-165-658-5804 20,239.50
30710 08/27/96 000818 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC RETENTION W/HOLD INV C 1410 210-2035 2,023.95- 18,215.55
30711 08/27/96 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM DRAW 9 FOR PACITTO CONST #101 210-190-808-5804 20,000.00 20,
30712 08/27/96 002350 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTI JUL PRGSS-CITY HALL(CHG ORDER) 210-199-650-5804 42,587.49
30712 08/27/96 002350 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTI JUL PRGSS-CITY HALL CONSTRUCTN 210-199-650-5804 255,653.56
30712 08/27/96 002350 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTI JUL PRGSS-CITY HALL(RETENTION) 210-2035 29,824.10- 268,416.95
TOTAL CHECKS 1,671,387.67
ITEI\4 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO@
CITY MANAGER PAZ
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM:City Clerk
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under
the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of
microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. Attached Exhibit "A", details
Accounts Payable 92-93,Temecula Valley Pipe to Z; and Accounts Payable 93-94, A through
Postmaster, (Retention Code 40106). These records have been microfilmed in duplicate with
a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records
Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "A"
and "B" , as provided for in Resolution No. 92-1 7.
ATTACHMENTS:Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
JSG
TO:City Clerk
F'ROM:Kathy DiMeglio
Records Coordinator
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of: Accounts Payable 92-93 Temecula Valley Pipe to Accounts Payable
93-94 Postmaster (Retention Code 40106) . These records have been microfilmed in duplicate
with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The microfilming of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section
34090.5.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent to
the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's
adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
APPROVED-
Department Head:
Genie Roberts. Finance Department
@,919'
Date
APPROVED:
City Attorney-.
&6@er Thors@
Date
R:\foms\destruct.rqs
- RRDESTY ... RRO61 City of Temecula Doc. Ref..... 140 Page
08/13/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 40106 10:14:03
Destruction Date. 08/27/1996
Item Ret. File Reference I Storage Hedia
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/09/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 0100 Film 3821MIA0003
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/10/1992 92-93 Accounts Payable 92-93 40106 0101 Film 382lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/01/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0101 Film 382lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/02/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0102 Film 382lMlAOOOl
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/03/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0103 Film 382lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/04/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0104 Film 382lHlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/05/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0105 Film 382lMlAlOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
14- 01/06/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-49 40106 0106 Film 382lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
140 01/07/1993 93-94 Accounts Payable 93-94 40106 0107 Film 382lMlAOOO3
Group IV 140/120/The Vault
9 Records Processed
ITE?A 5
1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY OA
FINANCE D
CITY MAN@
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:City Clerk
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Establishing a Fee Schedule for the City Clerks Department
Prepared by: Kathy Dimeglio, Records Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:Adopt a Resolution, establishing an amended Fee Schedule for the
City Clerk's Department entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96@
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-59 WHICH
ESTABLISHED A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY CLERK'S
DEPARTMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT "A'
BACKGROUND: On June 12, 1990, the City Council approved Resolution No. 90-59
establishing the Fee Schedule for the City Clerk Department's production of City documents
pursuant to public records requests. There is a need to amend Exhibit 'A' of Resolution No. 90-
59 to accurately reflect additional types of records requests and to reflect current costs for
providing these services.
ATTACHMENTS:Exhibit "A"
KDM
RESOLLTTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-59
WHICH ESTABLISHED A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY
CLERK'S DEPARTMIENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
, it is the statutory responsibility of the City Clerk's Office to respond to all
requests for public records, to provide duplicate copies and to conduct research in the course of
completing requests for documentation; and,
S, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No.90-59 on
June 12, 1990 to establish a fee schedule; and
S, it is necessary to periodically review and modify these fees to reflect current
costs for providing these services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula orders as follows:
Section 1. There is hereby established a revised fee schedule for the City Clerk's
Department, attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
Section 2. The funds collected for these services shall be deposited in the Receiving
Account of the General Fund.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Reso.90-59.Rev.96
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 27th day of August, 1996, by the following roll call vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Reso.90-59.Rcv.96
EXHI]BIT "All
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
FEE SCHEDULE FOR CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
ITEM Ea
A. Standard Duplication (8 1/2 x 11) $.25/Page
B. Municipal Code $100.00
Supplements (Semi-Annual) $ 40.00
C. Agendas - Annual Subscription $ 40.00
Minutes - Annual Subscription $ 65.00
D. Agenda Packets - Annual Subscription $175.00
Individual Agenda Packets $ 20.00
E. Extended Research Staff Hourly Rate
Plus 30% (Benefits)
and 15 % (Overhead)
F . Magnetic Tape Review Staff Hourly Rate
Plus 30% (Benefits)
and 15% (Overhead)
G. Campaign Disclosure Statements $. 10/Page
H. Audio Tape Duplication - Any Portion $15.00
Video Tape Duplication - Any Portion $20.00
I. Additional Charges Reimbursement of City's Cost
(i.e., Sales Tax, if Applicable)
Reso.90-59.Rev.96
ITE 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE
FINANCE DIRE
CITY MANAGI
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 25004-1 (Northeasterly of the
intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY: Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 25004-1, AUTHORIZE the initiation
of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Streets and Drainage,
and Water, and Sewer Bond amounts, release of the Subdivision Monument Bond, and
DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On August 25, 1992, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 25004-1, and entered into
subdivision agreements with:
JLD Properties, a California General Partnership
22865 Lake Forest Drive
El Toro, CA 92630
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds
issued by Developers Insurance Company as follows:
1 Bond No. 229848S in the amount of $762,500($465,500, $1 55,500, and $141,500,
respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets and drainage, water, and sewer
improvements.
2. Bond No. 229848S in the amount of $382,000 ($233,000, $78,000, and $71,000,
respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets and drainage, water, and sewer
improvements.
3.Bond No. 229834S in the amount of $20,900 to cover subdivision monumentation.
r: \agdrpt\9 6\0827\tr25004 1. mon
On October 11, 1994, the City Council authorized the maximum allowable partial reduction
of fifty-percent (50%) of the faithful performance bond amount as requested by the
developer, and confirmed by the sewer/water district and Public Works Staff. There was no
change in the labor and materials and subdivision monumentation securities at that time.
The developer retained the following faithful performance bond amount to assure
completion of the remaining work:
Street, drainage, water, and sewer improvements: Bond No. 229848S $381,250
Public Works Staff has inspected the improvements and concurs with Eastern Municipal
Water District (supplier of both water and sewer service) in recommending acceptance of
improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and reduction to the faithful
performance warranty amount as follows:
Street, drainage, water, and sewer improvements: Bond No. 229848S $76,250
The Labor and Material Security will be maintained in place until the contractual six-month
lien period expires.
Staff has office and field reviewed the subdivision monumentation and tie data, and
recommends the release of the following bond:
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 229834S $20,900
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City
Council Resolution No. 96-at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted
are Diego Drive, Andrews Way,and portions of Jons Place and Seraphina Road.
Other streets shown and offeredto the public on the final tract map are in the "remainder"
parcels and are not to be developed at this time. Improvement plans have not been
approved and no bonds are posted for this future phase of work. These proposed streets
include Chandler Drive, and portions of Suzi Lane, Chrishelle Lane, and Orion Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
r:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr250041 mon
RACT
c. 25004-1
Lii
CALIFORNIA
5t
z
VICINITY MAP ii
NO SCALE
T
L\j I
c,. 6 l@
N07 To
7
TRACT NO. 25004-1
Locatioin
ITEN4 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY rN'
FINANCE DIRECTOR-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Material and Labor Bonds in
Tract No. 21082-1 (Northwesterly of intersection of Rancho California
Road at Margarita Road)
PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond and the
Material and Labor Bond for street, water, and sewer improvements for Tract No. 21082-1,
and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and notify the
Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On July 8, 1986, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Kaiser Development Company, a California Corporation
for the improvement of streets, installation of water and sewer systems, and subdivision
monumentation in Tract No. 21082-1. Original bonds were posted by Insurance Company of
the West as follows:
1 . Bond No. 13 68 99 in the amount of $162,000 to cover street improvements
2.Bond No. 13 69 00 in the amount of $71,500 to cover water system improvements
3.Bond No. 13 81 41 in the amount of $52,000 to cover sewer system improvements
4.Bonds No. 13 68 99, 13 69 00, and 13 81 00 in the amounts of $81,000, $35,750,
and $26,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, and water and sewer
system improvements
5. Bond No. 13 81 42 in the amount of $8,500 to cover subdivision monumentation
,:\.gd,pt\96=27@t,21087 I. .1
On March 20, 1990, the Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with the
succeeding developer, Mesa Homes. Riverside County required the new developer to post an
increased Street Improvement bond amount for both Faithful Performance and Material and
Labor purposes, which Insurance Company of the West posted as follows:
1 . Bond No. 13 68 99 in the amount of $210,000 to cover street improvements
2.Bond No. 13 69 00 in the amount of $71,500 to cover water system improvements
3.Bond No. 13 81 41 in the amount of $52,000 to cover sewer system 'improvements
4.Bonds No. 13 68 99, 13 69 00, and 13 81 41 in the amounts of $105,000, $35,750,
and $26,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, and water and sewer
system improvements.
5. Bond No. 13 81 42 in the amount of $8,500 to cover subdivision monumentation
On July 1 1, 1 995, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year
warranty period, authorized release of the subdivision monument bond and reduction in Faithful
Performance Bonds to the 10% warranty amount as follows:
Street Improvements Bond No. 13 68 99 $21,000
Water System Improvements Bond No. 13 69 00 $7,150
Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 13 81 41 $ 5,200
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. The lien period having been exceeded and no claims made, Staff recommends
release of the following bonds:
Bonds No. 13 68 99, 13 69 00, and 13 81 41 in the amounts of $105,000, $35,750,
and $26,000, respectively, to cover labor and material for street, and water and sewer
system improvements.
The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 95-61. The streets within the subdivision are Red River Circle, Danube Court,
and a portion of Yukon Drive.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENT:
Location Map
@d rpt\96\M 27\t,21082 1. @ I
140T T SCALE
D
VICR= MAP
NOT TO SCALE
4 3 2
LIF:ORNIA
tu l@
TRACT NO. 21082-1
Location MaD
@ ITEN4 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM:@Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW96-10 FY96-97
Citywide A.C. Street Repairs
PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1Award a contract for Project No. PW96-10, FY96-97 Citywide A.C. Street Repairs, to
Universal Asphalt for $169,469.45 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $16,946.95 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On July 9, 1996, the City Council approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project includes removal
and replacement of A.C., A.C. overlays, A.C. berm installation, A.C. berm removal and
replacement and over-the-side drain repairs.
The engineer's estimate for this project was $1 75,000.00.
Seven (7) bids were publicly opened on August 7, 1996 and results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. Universal Asphalt $169,469.45
2. Holland-Lowe $180,992.60
3. Laird $194,980.00
4. D.G. Yeager $218,000.00
5. R.J. Noble $218,953.45
6. N.P.G. Corp $246,148.00
7. Matich $288,865.00
r\agdrpt\96\0827\pw96-1 O.awd/ajp
Universal Asphalt has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other
areas of this scope of work.
The construction schedule is sixty (60) days. Work is expected to begin in September, 1996
and be completed by the end of October, 1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 001-164-
601-5402. The total project is $186,416.40 which included the contract amount of
$169,469.45 plus 10% contingency of $16,946.95.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract
r\agdrpt\96\0827\pw96-1 0. awd/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW96-10
FY 96-97 CITYWIDE A. C. STREET REPAIRS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of August, 1996, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY', and Universal Asphalt,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR.'
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
l.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW96-10 FY 96-97
CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard S12ecifications for Public Works
Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications') as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. PW96-10 FY 96-97 CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-10 FY 96-97 CITYWIDE A.C.
STREET REPAIRS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that
only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/ajp
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as bindin6
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide
and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW96-10
FY 96-97 CITYWIDE A.C. STREET REPAIRS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE HUNDRED SIXTY NINE
THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY NINE DOLLARS and FORTY-FIVE CENTS ($169,469.45), the
total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Forty Five (45) working days,
commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until
bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
6.PAYMENTS,
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City
Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in
such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer
may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis
for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/ajp
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal
to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule.
Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each
successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part
thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and
the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the
CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is
demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the
amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments
on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
7.WARRANTY RETENTIQN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
$25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3%
$75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount
in excess of $500,000
8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant
to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not
be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the
fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/ajp
10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as
a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker,
or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
ii.TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTU. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance
of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
17.BOOKS AND RECORDS,. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/ajp
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:CONTRACTOR
Universal Asphalt
10610 S. Painter Avenue
Santa Fe Springs, California 90670
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:Xcip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/aip
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:Xcip\projects\pw96-1 O\contract/ajp
i
i
I
E14 9
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: v August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Award of Contract for the Construction of a Traffic Signal at the
Intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive/Humber Drive.
Project No. PW96-08
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Ali Moghadam, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1 .Award a contract for the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Cosmic Drive/Humber Drive, Project No. PW96-08 to Signal
Maintenance, Inc. for $74,1 55.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $7,415.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On June 25, 1996, City Council approved the construction plans and specifications and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the installation
of a traffic signal at the above referenced intersection. This project includes installation of a
four-way fully actuated traffic signal and minor signing and striping at this intersection. The
installation of a traffic signal at this location is included in the FY96-97 Capital Improvement
Program.
The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $100,000.00.
R-,kAGD@092'APW@.AWD rh
Six (6) bids for this project were received and publicly opened on August 8, 1996, and the
results are as follows:
1 Signal Maintenance, Inc $74,155.00
2. Sierra Pacific Electric $74,460.00
3. DBX, Inc $74,570.00
4. Macades Electric $75,313.00
5. Lekos Electric $77,208.00
6. Paul Gardner Corporation $83,867.00
Staff has reviewed the bids for compliance with the City requirements and Signal Maintenance,
Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Signal Maintenance, Inc. has performed
similar projects for the City in the past with satisfactory results including the installation of the
traffic signal at Margarita Road and La Serena Way and 79 South and Pala Road (currently
under construction).
To expedite installation of this traffic signal and to minimize the delay due to the waiting period
for obtaining the poles and mastarms (currently, 10 to 12 weeks), the City ordered this
equipment prior to award of the contract.
The specifications allow forty five (45) working days for completion of this project. Work is
expected to begin in September, 1996 and be completed in November, 1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees -
Signal Mitigation. Funds are available for the construction contract amount of $74,1 55.00 and
contingency amount of $7,415.50. The total amount of $81,570.50 has been transferred to
the Capital Improvement Fund and appropriated in account No. 210-165-664-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract
R-\AGD@082'APW96-08AWD rh
CITY OF TEM[ECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM[ENT
CONTRACR
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW96-08
TRAFFIC SIGNAL @ RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND COSMIC DRIVEIHUMBER DRIVE
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of August, 1996, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY', and Signal
Maintenance Inc., hereinafter referred to as 'CONTRACTOR.'
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
l.a.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW96-
08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL @ RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE/HUMBER
DRIVE, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto,
the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1 992 Ed.)
where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest
version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the
Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of
California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-
08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE/HUMBER
DRIVE. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General,
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical.Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-
08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL @ RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE/HUMBER
DRIVE.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in
lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed
completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless
CONTRACT CA-1 R:%CIP\PROJECTS\PWB"B\CONTRACT rh
otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools,
equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW96-08 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
COSMIC DRIVE/HUMBER DRIVE
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3.CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: SEVENTY
FOUR THOUSAND, ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS
($74,155.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty five (45)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
6.PAYMENTS,
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30)
days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PWQ"B\CONTRACT rh
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
7.WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
$25,000 - $75,000 1 80 days 3 %
$75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount
in excess of $500,000
8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIP\PROJECTSV-WOS-OS\CONTRACT rh
10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25-00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11.TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.GRATUITIES.. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice inviting Bids.
15.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
16.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PWQ"B\CONTRACT rh
17.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
21.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC.
2283 Via Burton Street
Anaheim, California 92806
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-6 R:XCIP\PROJECTS\PWO"SkCONTRACT rh
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R:kCIP\PROJECTS\PW9"8\CONTRACT rh
ITE 1 0
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1 996
SUBJECT:Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 25004-1). (Northeasterly of the intersection of Nicolas
Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY: @Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 967-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS
INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT
NO. 25004-1)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved Tract No. 25004-1 on August 25, 1992, and entered into
Subdivision Improvement Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer
improvements with JLD Properties, a California General Partnership.
The City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract on August 27, 1996 and
initiated the faithful performance warranty period.
The public streets now being accepted by this action are as follows:
Diego Drive, Andrews Way, and portions of Jons Place and Seraphina Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
R: \agd rpt@96\0827\tr25004 1. mst
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY AINED-STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 25004-1)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by JLD Properties, a California General
Partnership Development Company, with the recordation of Tract Map No. 25004-1; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 25004-1
on August 27, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO
by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R: \agdrpt\9 6@0827\tr25004 1. mst
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of August, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
R:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr250041 mst
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City
of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 25004-1, and
accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained-Street
System as described below:
Those lots described as Lots "A", and 'D' through"Fll inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 25004-1, filed 9 September 1992,
in Book 241 of Maps, Pgs 29-35 Incl., further described as
follows:
Lot "A" Portion of Seraphina Road
Lot "D" Andrews Way
Lot "E" Diego Drive
Lot "F" Portion of Jons Place
Those Lots designated Lots ' B", 'C", and 'G" through 'I"
Incl., were dedicated and accepted for public road and public
utility purposes on the tract map. Acceptance into the City
Maintained-Street System was conditioned subject to
improvement in accordance with city standards. improvement
plans have not been submitted/approved or constructed for
these several streets and bonds have not been posted for the
work:
Lot 'B"Portion of proposed Suzi Lane
Lot "C"Proposed Chandler Drive
Lot "G"Portion of proposed ChrisheHe Lane
Lots 'H" & "I"Portions of proposed Orion Road
R: lagd rpt\96\08 27@tr25004 1. mst
EXHIBIT "B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
89-17 51 7;, J,
I-RACT
c.25CO-,-,.
'KS Cy.
ot .r
JOSEPH OAD
CALIFORNIA
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
N07 TO
LEGEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACC C@-
AINED SYSTEM
ITEI\4 11
PPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: April 23, 1996
SUBJECT:Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake Alteration between
California Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula - First
Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridges over Murrieta Creek
PREPARED BY: John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Agreement regarding proposed stream or lake alteration
(Notification No. 5-033-96) between the California Department of Fish and Game and the City
of Temecula, and direct the Director of Public Works to sign the said Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the proposed construction of First Street and Western Bypass Corridor
Bridges over Murrieta Creek, the Environmental Studies pursuant to Section 1601 of California
Fish and Game Code have been completed. Based on that study, it has been determined that
fish and wildlife may be effected by the proposed construction. The Department of Fish and
Game has reviewed the study and is proposing certain mitigating measures as conditions of the
permit.
The various mitigation measures are described in the attached agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact associated with the total cost of compliance with the subject agreement will
be included and determined as part of the construction cost of both the First Street and
Western Bypass Corridor Bridges accordingly.
ATTACHMENTS*
1 . Agreement between the Department of Fish and Game and the City of Temecula
-I- r.\agdrpt\96\0827unurrl6Ol.agrlajp
ATTACHMENT NO.1
-2- r.\agdMA96NO827\muffl6Ol.agriajp
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
330 Golden Shore, Suite 50
Long Beach, California 90802
Notification No. 5-033-96 Paae 1 of 5
AGREEMENT REGARDING PROPOSED STREAM OR LAKE ALTERATION
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into between the State of California, Department of
Fish and Game, hereinafter called the Department, and name: JoseDh Kicak,
title: Director of Public Works, representing: City of Temecula, address:
43174 Business Park Drive, phone: (909). 676-7000, County of Riverside, State
of California, hereinafter called the Operator, is as follows:
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 1601 of California Fish and Game Code, the
Operator, on the 19th day of September, 1995, notified the Department that
they intend to divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or change the bed,
channel, or bank of, or use material from the streambed(s) of, the following
water(s): Murrieta Creek of Riverside County,,tributary to Santa Margarita,
located approximately 1500 feet westerly of the intersection of Front Street
and 1-15. -Sections 11-13, Township 8S, Range 3W, USGS Map Temecula.
WHEREAS, the Department has determined that such operations may substantially
adversely affect existing fish and wildlife resources including: those
songbirds, raptors, other birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, plants, and
all other aquatic resources and wildlife in the streambed/lake and associated
area affected by the proposed project in this agreement.
THEREFORE, the Department hereby proposes measures to protect fish and
wildlife resources during the Operator's work. The Operator hereby agrees to
accept the following measures/conditions as part of the proposed work.
If the Operator's work changes from that stated in the notification specified
above, this agreement is no longer valid and a new notification shall be
submitted to the Department of Fish and Game. Failure to comply with the
provisions of this agreement and with other pertinent code sections, including
but not limited to Fish and Game Code Sections 5650, 5652, 5937, and 5948, may
result in prosecution.
Nothing in this agreement authorizes the Operator to trespass on any land or
property, nor does it relieve the Operator of responsibility for compliance
with applicable federal, state, or local laws or ordinances. A consummated
agreement does not constitute Department of Fish and Game endorsement of the
proposed operation, or assure the Department's concurrence with permits
required from other agencies.
THIS AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DATE OF DEPARTMENT'S SIGNATURE AND
TERMINATES May 25, 1997, for the proposed project only. The Operator may
request an extension of the agreement annually for a 12-month period if
additional construction time is necessary. The extension shall be requested
prior to the termination date of the agreement. This agreement shall remain
in effect for that time necessary to satisfy the terms/conditions of this
agreement.
PacTe 2 of 5 (5-033-96)
STREAMBED ALTERATION CONDITIONS FOR NOTIFICATION NUMBER: 5-033-96
1. The following provisions constitute the limit of activities agreed to and
resolved by this agreement. The signing of this agreement does not imply that
the Operator is precluded from doing other activities at the site. However,
activities not specifically agreed to and resolved by this agreement, shall be
subject to separate notification pursuant to Fish and Game Code 1600 et seq..
2. The Operator proposes to alter the following streambed: murrieta creek, to
perform the following work: Construction of the Western Bypass Bridge and the
First Street Bridge, as described in the submitted application.
1.)The Western Bypass bridge will be a three span bridge with two piers in
the creek. The bridge will be approximately 250 feet long and 90 feet
wide. Approximately 0.26 acres of permanent impacts to freshwater
emergent marsh and riparian vegetation and 0.26 acres of temporary
impacts to wetland vegetation within murrieta Creek.
2.)The First Street bridge will be a two span bridge with a footing in the
active portion of Murrieta Creek. This bridge will be approximately 200
feet long and 100 feet wide. In addition to the First Street bridge
construction, a 12 inch sewer line will be placed adjacent to the bridge
and within the area of temporary construction impacts. The sewer line
will be placed below scour line. The proposed project will impact
approximately 0.25 acre of wetlands.
3. The agreed work includes activities associated with condition No. 2 above.
The project area is located in the following streambed Murrieta Creek, Riverside
County, located approximately as follows:
1.)the Western Bypass will be 1500 feet west of the intersection of Front
Street and I-15 and
2.)the First Street bridge will be continuation of First Street. Sections
11-13, Township 8 S, Range 3 W, USGS Map Temecula.
Specific work areas and mitigation measures are described on/in the plans and
documents submitted by the operator and shall be implemented as proposed, unless
directed differently by this agreement,
4. The Operator shall request an extension of this agreement prior to its
termination. Extensions may be granted for up to 12 months from the date of
termination of the agreement and are subject to Departmental approval. The
extension request and fees shall be submitted to the Department's Region 5 Office
at the above address. If the Operator fails to request the extension prior to
the agreement's termination, then the Operator shall submit a new notification
with fees and required information to the Department. The Operator may recluest
up to two extensions of this agreement. Any activities conducted under an
expired agreement are a violation of Fish & Game Code Section 1600 et.seq..
5. The Operator certifies by signing this agreement that the project site has
been surveyed and shall not impact any rare, threatened or endangered species; or
the Operator certifies that such a survey is not required for the proposed
project. If rare, threatened or endangered species occur within the proposed
work area, or could be impacted by the work proposed, this agreement shall not be
valid and the operator shall not proceed with the project until the Operator
consults with the Department and obtains any required State and/or Federal
permits.
G. The Operator shall mitigate for temporary construction impacts at both
locations by restoring the area with native riparian and/or emergent marsh
species.
PacTe 3 of 5 (5-033-96)
7. The Operator shall mitigate for permanent impacts to the riparian community
by restoring riparian vegetation within the construction zone and by restoring
and enhancing approximately I acre of degraded wetland and riparian habitat on
Tucalota Creek. in addition, the City shall purchase a 120 acre parcel
containing approximately 7.34 acres of Tucalota Creek, this parcel shall be added
to the Skinner Lake Reserve.
B. The Operator shall implement the Riparian Woodland Creation Plan and
Revegetation Plan prepared by Tom Dodson and Asociates, dated may 20, 1996. The
operator shall also submit to the Department an annual monitoring report
describing the success of the creation and restoration efforts.
9. In those project areas where nesting birds may occur, the Operator shall not
remove potential nesting riparian vegetation from March 15 through September 1.
10. The Operator shall implement recommendations detailed in the Recommendations
for the Southwestern Pond Turtle and the Arroyo Chub in Murrieta Creek, dated May
1996. The Operator shall employ these techniques to avoid impacts to all
sensitive native fish species within Murrieta Creek. The Operator shall consult
with the Department of Fish & Game Fisheries Biologist Mike Guisti at (909) 597-
1008, for information on native species in that portion of Murrieta Creek.
11. The removal or disturbance of soil, vegetation and vegetative debris from
the streambed or bank shall not exceed the limits approved by the Department, or
as described in the submitted application.
12. Areas of disturbed soils with slopes toward a stream shall be stabilized to
reduce erosion potential. where possible, stabilization shall include the
revegetation of stripped or exposed areas with vegetation native to the area.
Planting, seeding and mulching is conditionally acceptable. Where suitable
vegetation cannot reasonably be expected to become established, non-erodible
materials may be used for such stabilization.
13. vehicles shall not be driven or equipment operated in water covered portions
of a stream or lake or in wetted areas, or where wetland vegetation, riparian
vegetation, or aquatic organisms may be destroyed, except as otherwise provided
for in the agreement and as necessary to complete authorized work.
14. If a stream channel has been altered during project operations, its low flow
channel shall be returned as nearly as possible to pre-project conditions without
creating a possible future streambed or bank erosion problem, or a flat wide
channel or sluice-like area. The disturbed portions of any stream channel within
the high water mark of the stream shall be restored to as near original condition
as possible, except as otherwise indicated in the submitted application or as
directed by the Department.
15. Fill length, width, and height dimensions shall not exceed those of the
original installation or the original naturally occurring topography, contour,
and elevation; fill shall be limited to the minimal amount necessary to
accomplish the agreed activities; fill construction materials other than on-site
alluvium, shall consist of clean =contaminated soil, silt-free gravel, and/or
river rock; except as described in the submitted application or as otherwise
specified in this agreement.
16. Vegetation removed from the site shall not be stockpiled in the
streambed/creek or on its bank. The sites selected on which to push this
material out of the stream should be selected in compliance with the other
provisions of this agreement. where possible, suitable brush piles may be left
to provide wildlife habitat.
17. This agreement does not authorize the construction of any temporary or
permanent dam, structure, flow restriction or fill, except as described in the
Operator's notification. Any temporary dam, artificial obstruction, or other
flow diversion shall be constructed from materials, such as clean gravel or
sandbags, which will cause little or no siltation. If necessary, flow diversions
shall be done in a manner that shall prevent pollution, minimize siltation and
which shall provide flows to downstream reaches. Flows to downstream reaches
shall be provided during all times that the natural flow would have supported
Page 4 of 5 (5-033-96)
aquatic life. Said flows shall be of sufficient quality and quantity to support
existing aquatic life both above and below the diversion. Normal flows shall be
restored to the stream immediately upon completion of work at that location.
18. Precautions to minimize turbidity/siltation shall be taken into account
during project planning and implementation. This may require that the work site
be isolated and /or the construction of silt catchment basins, so that silt, or
other deleterious materials are not allowed to pass to downstream reaches. The
placement of any structure or materials in the stream for this purpose, not
included in the original project description, shall be coordinated with the
Department. Coordination shall include the negotiation of additional agreement
provisions.
19. Upon Department determination that turbidity/siltation levels resulting from
project related activities constitute a threat to aquatic life, activities
associated with the turbidity/siltation, shall be halted until effective
Department approved control devices are installed, or abatement procedures are
initiated.
20. Spoil sites shall not be located within a stream/lake, where spoil can be
washed back into a stream/lake, or where it will cover aquatic or riparian
vegetation. The Operator may remove all human generated debris, such as lawn and
farm cuttings, garbage and trash.
21. Structures and associated materials, including debris, not designed to
withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the high water mark
before such flows occur.
22. No equipment maintenance shall be done,within or near any stream channel or
lake margin where petroleum products or other pollutants from the equipment may
enter these areas under any flow.
23. The Operator shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All
contractors, subcontractors and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall
he the responsibility of the operator to ensure compliance.
24. The clean-up of all pollution spills shall begin immediately. The operator
shall notify the Department immediately of any spills and shall consult with the
Department regarding clean-up procedures and requirements.
25. All debris, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, silt, cement or concrete or
washings thereof, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other
petroleum products, or any other substances resulting from project related
activities which could be hazardous to aquatic life or waters of the state, shall
be prevented from contaminating the soil and/or entering the waters of the state.
None of these materials shall be allowed to enter into or be placed within or
where they may enter or be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the state.
When operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed
from the work area ' No rubbish shall be deposited within 1SO feet of the high
water mark of any stream or lake.
26. All provisions of this agreement remain in force throughout the term of the
agreement. Any provisions of the agreement may be amended or the agreement may
be terminated at any time provided such amendment and/or termination is agreed to
in writing by both parties. Mutually approved amendments become part of the
original agreement and are subject to all previously negotiated provisions.
27.If the Operator or any of the individuals mentioned above, violate any of
theterms or conditions of this agreement, all work shall terminate immediately
andshall not proceed until the Department has taken all of its legal actions.
28.The Department reserves the right to enter the project site at any time to
ensure compliance with terms/conditions of this agreement.
29. The Operator shall provide a copy of this agreement to all contractors,
subcontractors, and the Operator's project supervisors. Copies of the agreement
shall be readily available at work sites at all times during periods of active
work and must be presented to any Department personnel, or personnel from another
agency upon demand.
Page 5 of 5 (5-033-96)
30. The Operator shall notify the Department, in writing, at least five (5) days
prior to initiation of construction (project) activities, and at least five (5)
days prior to completion of construction (project) activities. Notification
shall be sent to the Department at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA
90802, Attn: Environmental Services.
31. The Department reserves the right to suspend and/or revoke this agreement if
the Department determines that the circumstances warrant. The circumstances that
could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following:
a.Failure to comply with the terms/conditions of this
agreement.
b.The information provided by the operator in support of the
Notification/Agreement is determined by the Department to be
incomplete, or inaccurate.
C.When new information becomes available to the Department
representatives) that was not known when preparing the
original terms/conditions of this agreement.
d.The project as described in the Notification/Agreement has
changed, or conditions affecting fish and wildlife resources
change.
CONCURRENCE:
City of TemeculaCalifornia Department of
Fish and Game
Jose,oh Kicak Dee Sudduth
(signature) (date) (signature) (date)
Environmental Specialist III
(title) (title)
z
ITEIA 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Summary Vacation of a Portion of South General Kearny Road from
La Serena Way to Meadows Parkway
PREPARED BY: Larry Cooley, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF SOUTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD BETWEEN LA SERENA WAY AND
MEADOWS PARKWAY. SAID RESOLUTION IS PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE.
BACKGROUND:
South General Kearny Road was dedicated to the County of Riverside per Instrument No. 60190
on June 24, 1970. Said dedication was for an 88-foot wide right-of-way from La Serena Way
to Meadows Parkway, formerly known as Kaiser Parkway and delineated on Amended Parcel
Map 21884. No street improvements have been constructed within the dedicated easement
for South General Kearny Road. However, the street easement overlaps the right-of-way
owned by Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The street vacation will not affect the interests
of MWD.
McMillan Project Services, Inc. is intending to record a final tract map (Tract 23371-15) for the
golf course within the Temeku Development, as part of Specific Plan No. 199. As such, the golf
course map will obliterate any street connection from La Serena Way to Meadows Parkway.
South General Kearny Road will terminate in a cul-de-sac approximately 870 feet southeasterly
of the intersection of La Serena Way, and provide access and turnaround for the interests of
the Temeku Golf Course.
-I- r:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr23371.vac/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A" and 'B", inclusive
-2- r:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr23371.vac/ajp
RESOLUTTON NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CrrY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY
OF S Y VACATING A FORTTON OF
SOUTH GENERAL ROAD BETWFEN LA SERENA
WAY AND WS PARKWAY. SAID RESOLUTTON ]IS
PLTRSUANT TO THE AUTHORrrY PROVI]DED BY
CHAPTER 4, PART 3, D@ION 9 OF THE STREETS AND
HlGlffWAY CODE
TBE CITY COUNCIIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES Y RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare as follows:
(a)That the City Council intends to summarily vacate under Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9 of
the California Sftwts and Highways Code, that portion of a street easement in the City of
Temecula , described as follows:
That portion of that street known as South General Kearny Road between La Serena
Way and Meadows Parkway, as shown on Amended Parcel Map No. 21884, on file in the
office of the County Recorder of Riverside County. That portion is more particularly
described in Exhibits "A" and "B" which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference; and
(b)For a period of five (5) consecutive years, the street easement has been impassable for
vehicular travel; and
(c)No public money was expended for maintenance on the street easement during such
period; and
(d)Vacating the street easement is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the City of
Temecula on November 9th, 1993.
Section 2. The easement described in Exhibits "A" and "Bm which are attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference is hereby vacated and from and after the date this
Resolution is recorded, this street easement @ no longer constitute an easement or right-of-way
of the City of Temecula and shall revert back to the property owner.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall ce@ the adoption of this Resolution.
-3- r:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr233 7 I.vac/ajp
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of August, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt%96\0827\tr233 7 1 vac/ajp
EXHEBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT SUMMARY VACATION -
A PORTION OF SOUTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
M-INOIC.4rES R16,qr O/C
W4Y,V4C,4rlOIV
)-INol@r@6 R@ow
IW,4,eaAel T4 eO. OM&46UIe@ P@R
,o --3/
11,4RC@Z I
C@- - 9 a D C) I A. p J\J.
3-DE3c)-c)c
FAV#1917' in -o-,
80
147ARC-ZZ 3 A. ! P, N,
IN-57'NO SOI?O -e-d- F, j\jl, 61 3 0
1 -- J-\ Fl, I\L
15,FZOJV CZ C),5' C)
A. F. N.
--A,PN.
963 -050-rJO4
TRACT 23371-1
\A E, 21 6/@ 6
A. P,
S, 85 /5
A. P, j\l,
Fl, J\I,
DETAIL
N. T. S.
r:\agdrpt\96\0827\tr23371.vac/ajp
EXHMIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT SUMMARY VACATION -
A PORTION OF SOUTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
LA/
Zse
N.f 9 ".4J,."'W
C L L
/.2 2
00' corlolv f
-P. J\/J,
)5,3 -DE30-CO2 9@
,4 Ar
-140a
f
S'Lloo,
98 49.00'
LA SERENA WAY.
ZI,V,FP,FR RS 70185-9@'
4.4'
R,5 70le5- 95
DETAIL
N-TS.
W4,v @4 CA 7' IOIV
4, 2?;L371-tr2
- MAP P@j\/J, 1,52/@2
r:\agdrpt\96\0927\tr23371.voc/ajp
ITE 13
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTO
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Final Tract Map No. 23371-15 (located northerly of Rancho California
Road, between Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway)
PREPARED BY: Larry D. Cooley, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 23371-15 subject to Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract No. 23371 was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on
November 8, 1988. The tentative map was approved to allow the filing of multiple final maps.
Tentative Tract No. 23371 was granted an initial extension of time on November 8, 1990. A
Memorandum of Understanding effective April 23, 1996, between the City and McMillan
Project Services, Inc., extends the life of the tentative map until November 8, 2000. The
Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval for the recordation of this final
map for the golf course.
Final Tract No. 23371-1 5 contains seven golf course lots within 77.5 gross acres. The tract
is located northerly of Rancho California Road, between Meadows Parkway and Margarita Road.
This tract is part of the Margarita Village Specific Plan (County approved SP1 99) and County
of Riverside Development Agreement No. 5. The applicant is McMillan Project Services, Inc..
The purpose of this final map is to legalize the unmapped portion of the golf course for sale,
lease and financing purposes.
The following fees have been paid for Final Tract Map No. 23371-15:
Flood Control Fee (paid to County Flood Control District) $16,037.00
All other impact fees and dedications are applicable only to residential phases of the Temeku
development, and as such, do not apply to this golf course map, with the exception of street
dedications for portions of South General Kearny Road and Temeku Drive. South General
Kearny Drive is being vacated from La Serena Way to Meadows Parkway under separate
Resolution, except for a cul-de-sac to provide turnaround approximately 870 feet southerly of
La Serena Way (See attached Exhibit "A").
r\agdrpt%96\0827Ntr233371 I.maplajp
The following bond has been posted for Final Tract Map No. 23371-15:
Subdivision Monumentation Bond; Bond No. ICW1484108 in the amount of $15,660.00
No public street improvements are required as a condition of this map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Location Map
2.Exhibit 'A'; Street Dedications per Final Map
2. Monumentation Bond
-2- r.@agdrptN96\0827ktr233371 l.map/ajp
LOCATION MAP
FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 23371 -1 5
TEMECULA
RANCIIO
TEMECULA
N.T.S.
-3- r\agdrpt\96\0827\tr23-3371 l.map/ajp
EXHIBIT OAO
FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 23371-15: STREET DEDICATIONS FOR LOTS 'A' AND 'B'
3
kA ",',Ili
b
3
r.\agdrpt\96\0827\tr233371 I.map/ajp
BOND NO.: 148 41 08
PREMIUM: $188-00
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUBDIVISION MONUMENT BOND
HT@ D@LOPN=
'V AS, The City of Temecula, State of California, and PPR=RS, L-P.
(hereinafter designated as Principal") have entered into an agreement whereby Principal has
presented to the City for its approval a Final Subdivision Map, which Map carries the Encincer's
or Surveyor's certificate that the monuments will be set on or before a specified later date,
which said A-reement dated JUNE 27 19 96 , and identified as project
TRACT 23371 UNIT 15 is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
@REAS, said Principal shall insure the settin- of monuments and to -uarantee
payment to the Engineer or Surveyor for setting such monuments in said Subdivision, and as a
prerequisite to the approval of said Final Subdivision Map; and
NOW, THEREFOR.E, we the Principal and @w cF
are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California in the penal sum of
Fifteen Thousand Six Hundred Sixty and no/100 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
$ 15,660-00 , lawful money of the United States, for the payment of such sum well
and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators,
jointly and severally.
The condition of this obligation is such that the obligation shall become null and void
if the above-bounded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or
assigns, shall in all things stand to, abide by, well and truly keep, and perform the covenants,
conditions, and provisions in the agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein
provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein
specified, and in 611 respects according to his or their true intent and meaning and shall
indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, agerts, and employees, as
therein stipulated; otherwise, this obligation shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to
be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
as Surety,
agnits\ldagmts\sbdvmonu.bon
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, e>=-.@ion of time, alteration
or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be pe@-r-med thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its ob.--C,-ntlons on this bond, and
it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of timz-. =-iteration or addition to
the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been du!y exe=-,ed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on JUNE 27 , 1 9 96
[SEAL] [SEAL]
SURETY PRINCIPAL
IPISUP,A-,\T ANY OF Mv- WEST
TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, L. P.
a California limited partnership
By: McMillin Temeku, Inc., a California corporal
S7i-OU,X MUN-YON, A@j.OIZ,\M-IN-FACT
(Title) Its al p er
By: IA
Title:- v.
By:
6s", v ,
Title:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PETER M. THORSON
City Attorney
a gmLsX]dagmLs\sbdvmonu. bon
i
I
ITElq 14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor/City Council
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager@
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Resolution in Support of Murrieta Creek Pilot Project
PREPARED BY:Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City CouncilAdopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE MURRIETA CREEK PILOT PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
A broad coalition of concerned citizens, environmentalists, members of the development
community and local government officials has joined together to promote a plan for
improvement to Murrieta Creek. The improvements, as proposed by the plan, will become a
"model' for the ultimate development of Murrieta Creek that includes an aesthetically pleasing
and environmentally sensitive flood control channel that also will provide many recreational
opportunities for area residents. Recreational facilities will include walkways, bike paths, horse
trails, picnic areas and restroom facilities.
The pilot project or 'Demonstration Project' is being funded through donations of services, land
and money.
The attached resolution is presented for City Council consideration in support of this important
community project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 96-
Membership Listing for Citizens Coalition for the Murrieta Creek Pilot Project
p:pylea\murrcrk.res
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CrrY
OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE MURRIETA CREEK
PMOT PROJECT
THE CrrYCOUNC]IL OF THE CrrY OF TEMECULA DOES Y RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare as follows:, the flooding of Murrieta Creek has been a constant @t to the health, safety
and welfare of theCitizens of Temecula and Murrieta and;
WHEREAS, the Murrieta Creek most recently overflowed its banks in 1993, causing
million of dollars of damage to both private and public proprieties and;
WHEREAS, all of the efforts since the most recent flooding have not produced any
noticeable relief from potential future flooding and;
VMEREAS, a coalition made up of concerned citizens, environmentalists, members of
the development community and local government officials for the Murrieta Creek Pilot Project
is in support of immediate improvements to the full length of Murrieta Creek and;
AS, said coalition is in support of a Murrieta Creek Pilot Project providing for
safe passage of flood waters and recreational facilities within the area of said project and;
WHEREAS, a great amount of time and resources has been provided by ci@ns in
support of this project.
NOW THEREFORE be it resolved, the City Council of the City of Temecula
wholeheartedly supports the efforts of the coalition and respectfully requests support from local,
State and Federal legislators for approval of the project and corresponding Federal and State
funding to construct the facilities in this area and ultimately along the entire length of Murrieta
Creek.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, "PROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
p:pylaa\murrcrk.rat
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF I]DE ) Ss
CITY OF TEMEECLTLA )
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of August, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCIIL ERS:
NOES: 0 COUNC MBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIILNffiMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNC]ILMEMBERS:
r\agdrpt\96\OB27\murrcrk.res/ajp
Citizens Coalition for the ilvlurrieta Creel,- Pilot Project
John Affoltel'
C,,ii-%, E. @llen
tu Anderson
Cai@liene @del-son
John Arravo
lane Block-
Hector Correa
Bi 'II Coscarell'
Tim Crough
Bill Dendv
Vince DiI)onato
Kirk Dve
Steve ford
Willie Gale
Rit Gentrv
Jeannie Gillen, Coordinator
(909) 677-SOZS
Kathleen Hamilton
i'vla-x Harr' ison
Ravmond Johnson
Karel Lindemans
Austin LinsleN7
David Lowry
Larl,v v@arkham
Peter McCronazi
Bi'lan Padberg
Bill Rawlings
Ron ROI)elt5
Eileen Sarace
Dan Silvei,, iM.D.
C,ary Smith
Hei-b Smith
Dan Stephenson
.Jeff Stone
Cristv &- Ron Varela
Kevin \Valsli
Chuck Washington
Bob Wlieelei,
Tlioi-nas Williams, PVI.D.
Fzzbljc Accoiz,,ztii7t
fcL@iioi?7jc De vflc?p2nent
Count
y W.,7tci- Distr
Enii?cni77entalist
Ci@ Engineez-
Landscape C- En viii,-oineiitalist
)l4LZl7'7Ct,7 COLIntV W,7tel' DIStl'IC@"
Developrnent C- Construction
L,7,ndsc,7,pe Ai-chitect
Fisli Evcliange Rest.7urant O@iei-
TeAnecul,,7 City Cozincil
Union for a Kiver Greenbelt En i-,ironrnent
Los Alainas Histoi-7c Dis@-7cr
P.2,rk-s & Trails Ad voca te
local to national level
Union For A Ri ver Greenbelt Eii viroi7rne,,7 t
Develo 'p,,77ent C-onsult,,znt
En vironrnent,21 Fl@7er
YVI,,7yoi- o-t'the City ol'Teineczll.,7
,Vfurrieta school Bo@d
Coininei-ci.,zl Re.21 Est:ite
Developrneiit Constiltant S- Engineer
En@i-oninent.,ilist, Fb.D. i@ AS7-icziltzzi-c
llfe44 ,,]g BUSIneSS Ol+,ner
Re,,il Est,,ite X- Developinent
Torneczila City Council
Rei] Est.,ite X- E"7 @l-oninent"711st
fnc@gei-ed HaL-itats Lea ,gue S- P 0. P
@VIIII-7-iet,'l City COrinCil
Creej--qide Resident
Developel-
T@ectila Citj, Council
Coinpiny@
Ifurpieta City Council
j@'1111-2-jetZI CitV COlinCil
Resource Cons,-.rvatioii Dist2-ict
Physi'ci"7n ,C- 5117L@con
ITE14 15
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
DIROR OF FIN
CITYMANAGER_
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Council
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: CalPERS Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan for Service Credit Purchases
PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO PARTICIPATE
IN THE CALPERS PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVICE CREDIT
PURCHASES (CONTRIBUTION CODE 14).
BACKGROUND: The CalPERS Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan for Service Credit Purchase will
provide qualified members the option to elect the pre-tax payroll deduction plan for their service
credit purchases, primarily, Redeposits and Prior Service Credits. By filing this resolution with
CalPERS, employers are allowed to extend the pick-up of member contributions under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) 414(h)(2) provisions for member payments of service credit purchases.
By participating, we the employer, provide employees, who also opt to participate, with the
benefit of deferring income tax liability on member service credit purchases.
GENERAL RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS -
NoThe effective date for commencement of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan
cannot be any earlier than July 1, 1 996, or the date the employer's completed
resolution is received in CalPERS, whichever is later. The IRS does not allow
retroactive deductions;
00The pre-tax payroll deduction plan amount and time period are irrevocable and
cannot be adjusted at any time during the payroll deduction schedule nor can the
deductions revert to after-tax deduction status;
R\LANIERDA\P,EPORT%S'rAFF36.MIS 9/14/96
E*The deductions are considered member contributions and are subject to income
taxes when received by the member as either a retirement benefit or refund;
NoCancellation of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan prior to completion of
payments or termination of employment is not allowed by either the member or
employer.
EMPLOYER RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS -
NoThe employer must file with CalPERS a completed resolution to allow their
employees to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service credit
purchases. The resolution applies to all employees in the specified coverage
groups(s);
NoPre-tax deductions will be completed through the payroll reporting process using
Contribution Code 14 instead of Contribution Code 04;
Pre-tax payroll deductions (Contribution Code 14's) must not be reported by the
employer until authorization is received from CalPERS;
The employer is responsible for reducing the taxable income of a member by the
pre-tax payroll deduction amount;
Overpayments must be reported as negative adjustments through the payroll
reporting process. The employer will be responsible for returning such funds to
the member as taxable income.
MEMBER RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS -
The member has the option to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan;
Payroll deductions for service credit purchases for members who choose @ to
participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan must be reported as after-tax
contributions;
To specifically elect the pre-tax payroll deduction plan option, the member must
file a binding irrevocable election with CalPERS;
Direct cash payments (i.e., lump sum and partial payments) are not allowed
while the member is participating in the pre-tax payroll deduction plan;
Members with existing receivables (Code 04's) will be given the opportunity to
elect the pre-tax payroll deduction plan (Code 14's). This election will be applied
on a prospective basis only.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact, to the City, associated with this action.
However, employees who wish to purchase prior service credit will receive a tax benefit. Four
employees, currently purchasing prior service credit, will experience a tax benefit if they choose
to participate in this plan.
R:@IEP,DA\R-EPOR'RSrAFF36.MIS 8/14/96
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CULA TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE CALPERS PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR
SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES (CONTRIBUTION CODE 14).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, D AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
, the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CalPERS) at the April 1996 meeting approved a pre-tax payroll deduction plan for service
credit purchases under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 414(h)(2); and
AS, the City of Temecula has the authority to implement the provisions of IRC
section 414(h)(2) and has determined that even though implementation is not required by law, the
tax benefit offered by this section should be provided to those employees who are members of
CalPERS; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula elects to participate in the pre-tax payroll deduction
plan for all employees in the following CalPERS coverage group:
(Membership Coverage Group)
70001
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
Section 1: The City Council approve that the City of Temecula will implement the
provisions of IRC section 414(h)(2) by malting employee contributions for service credit purchases
pursuant to the California State Goverrunent Code on behalf of its employees who are members
of CalPERS and who have made a binding irrevocable election to participate in the pre-tax payroll
deduction plan. "Employee contributions" shall mean those contributions reported to CalPERS
which are deducted from the salary of employees and are credited to individual employee accounts
for service credit purchases thereby resulting in tax referral of employee contributions..
Section 2. That the contributions made by the City of Temecula to CalPERS, although
designated as employee contributions, are being paid by the City of Temecula in lieu of
contributions by the employees who are members of CalPERS.
Section 3.That the employees shall not have the option of choosing to receive the
contributed amountsdirectly instead of having them paid by the City of Temecula to CalpERS.
Section 4.That the City of Temecula shall pay to CalPERS the contributions
designated as employee contributions from the same source of funds as used in paying salary,
thereby resulting in tax deferral of employee contributions.
R\LANIEP,DA\REPOR'RSTAFF36.MIS 8/12/96
Section 5. That the effective date for commencement of the pre-tax payroll deduction
plan cannot be any earlier than July 1, 1996, or the date the completed resolution is received and
approved in CalPERS, whichever is later.
Section 6. That the governing body of the City of Temecula shall participate in and
adhere to requirements and restrictions of the pre-tax payroll deduction plan by reporting pre-tax
payroll deductions when autho@ by CalPERS for those employees of the above stated Coverage
Group who has elected to participate in this plan.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this --th day of 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
A=T:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
Resolution No. 96- - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the -th of 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMMERS:
ABSENT: COUNC ERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
R \LANIER-DA\REPOR'nSrAFF36.MIS 9/12/96
ITEIN4 16
APPROVAL
CM ATTOR
FINANCE DIF
CITY MANA(
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Franchise Agreement Amendment
PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Solid
Waste Franchise Agreement with CR&R Incorporated to modify mutually agreed upon areas
within the original franchise.
DISCUSSION: On May 28, 1991 the City Council approved and awarded an
exclusive franchise agreement to CR&R Incorporated ('Grantee') for refuse, recycling,
composting, and street sweeping services in the City of Temecula. The purpose of the
franchise is to provide for the public health and safety through the timely and systematic
collection and disposal of solid waste; and, to aid in complying with State mandates to divert
recyclable materials in the waste stream from landfills. The Grantee has performed those
services in accordance with the franchise agreement and to the satisfaction of the City.
Over the course of time, circumstances have caused various changes in the City's solid waste
operations. The proposed amendment will make minor changes to the franchise agreement to
accommodate the operational changes or to more clearly define the intent of the City and the
Grantee. Most of the proposed changes are considered 'housekeeping" items and serve to
clarify or expand upon the original franchise agreement.
A summary of the proposed changes includes the following:
Redesignates and updates various definitions to be in agreement with the City Municipal
Code or State Code.
Defines collection hours of service to be in agreement with the City Municipal Code.
Changes day of street sweeping to the day after collection rather than the same day.
This change is proposed because there were logistical problems with the sweeper
frequently completing its route prior to the trash and recyclables being picked up. This
sometimes resulted in debris being left on the streets after service.
Adds street sweeping of City owned and maintained paved trails to the franchise
agreement.
0719%
0Deletes free solid waste services for the Temecula Valley Unified School District from
the franchise agreement.
*Corrects a typographical error to read 'detached homes" instead of "attached homes'.
9Designates the cutoff date for the Grantee to supply the City with new parcel
information for inclusion on the tax roll for collection of single family solid waste fees.
*Allows the Grantee to display the company name of 'CR&R Incorporated' on all vehicles,
correspondence, billing statements, directory listings, references, signs, etc.
0Updates names, addresses, and phone and telecopier numbers for noticing purposes.
0Amends the date the Grantee's Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) will be operational to
January 1, 1997.
*Amends the rate adjustment formula to include landfill cost decreases as well as
increases so the City rate payers will benefit from those cost savings.
On August 1, 1996, the City submitted its annual report to the California Integrated Waste
Management Board for 1995. The City's diversion rate of solid waste from the landfills was
50.84%. Given the success of our diversion programs, staff is confident in recommending the
above changes to the franchise agreement and anticipates no adverse consequences as a result
of such action.
FISCAL IMPACT:
reduction, effective July 1, 1996, along to the City's rate payers.
There is no fiscal impact. The Grantee has already passed a landfill rate
Attachment: Franchise Amendment
r.14 cc 0719%
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CR&R
INCORPORATED, FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING,
COMPOSTING, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS AND FOR PROVIDING TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES
This Amendment to Franchise Agreement ('Amendment') is entered
into on , 1996, by and between the City of Temecula, a
municipal corporation ("City'), and CR&R Incorporated, a California corporation
("Grantee").
WHEREAS, City and Grantee entered into a franchise agreement for
collection and disposal of refuse on May 28, 1991 (the 'Franchise Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, City and Grantee desire to amend the Franchise
Agreementto update certain provisions in order to be consistent with current
practice;
THE CITY AND THE GRANTEE AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1 .All references in the Franchise Agreement to 'Chapter 6.10' of the
Temecula Municipal Code are hereby redesignated "Chapter 8.20".
2. All references in the Franchise Agreement to nAB 939" are hereby
Redesignated nthe Act", as that term is defined in Section 8.20.020 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
3.Section 2, "Definitionsm, is hereby revised to read as follows:
'Whenever any term used in this Franchise Agreement has been
defined by Chapter 8.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code or Division 30, Part 1,
Chapter 2 of the California Public Resources Code, the definitions in the Municipal
Code or Public Resources Code shall apply unless the term is otherwise defined in
this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the definitions in the
Municipal Code and the definitions in the Public Resources Code, the definitions in
the Municipal Code shall control."
4.Section 5, paragraph B(l) is revised to add the following at the end
thereof:
"Collection shall be made only between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 5:00
P.M. of any day, Monday through Saturday. Commercial pickup may begin at
5:00 A.M. Earlier pickup time may be authorized only upon prior written approval
R:\rusep\swamdl.crr
of the City Manager which shall include requirements for the Grantee to notify the
affected customers prior to implementing the change.
In order to prevent problems of traffic, noise, wear and tear an the highway,
or other problems having potential to adversely affect health, safety, or the
environment, which may develop in any specific area as a result of solid waste
collection, the City Manager may regulate the routes, intervals, delivery points,
and times for collection within the City.
During the hours for collection, residential containers shall be placed at the
curb or right of way for collection and shall be accessible for mechanized pick-up.
Commercial bins shall be accessible to the collector."
5. Section 5, paragraph F(l) is revised to read as follows:
"Weekly Se@. Grantee shall sweep and remove all debris from all
commercial, industrial, and residential public streets including all curbs and
medians, and City public parking lots and paved trails owned and/or maintained by
the City in the Franchise Area and future areas obtained through annexation, free
of charge. Commercial and industrial streets shall be swept in accordance with a
schedule prepared by Grantee. Residential streets shall be swept the day after the
area's designated refuse, recycling, and greenwaste collection day.'
6.Section 5, paragraph H(5) is revised to read as follows:
" (5) Grantee shall supply City facilities with earthquake/catastrophe
preparedness containers so that every municipal employee has the necessary
supplies readily available should the need arise."
7.Section 5, paragraph H(6) is revised to delete sub-paragraph (d).
8.Section 20, paragraph E(2) is revised to read as follows:
'tE.(2) City has elected to bill residents of single family detached
homes for standardrefuse collection and recycling through a parcel charge.
Therefore, Granteeshall be paid on January and July for the premises served.
Premises ordered after the first of -the month shall be charged on a prorated thirty
(30) day/monthly basis. In no event, shall City be required to use its general fund
to support the parcel charge system.
Grantee shall direct bill all single family detached homes beginning
service after the cutoff date for parcel information submittal for inclusion on the
following year's tax roll. Cutoff date at this time is March 31 of the year
preceding the tax roll year and may change from time to time as agreed upon by
City and Grantee. Grantee shall provide to City by an agreed upon date and in a
R:\rusep\swamdl.crr
format acceptable to City, all new parcels added during the preceding year for
inclusion on the tax roll."
9.Section 21, sub-paragraphs A(4) and A(6) are revised to read as
follows:
"(4) Grantee has agreed to name the specific organization that shall
provide all of the services under this Franchise Agreement as "CR&R
INCORPORATED". This name shall be used for all correspondence, billing
statements, directory listings, references, signs, vehicle identification, etc."
'(6) "CR&R Incorporated", a local or toll free telephone number, and
vehicle number shall be visibly displayed on all vehicles in letters and figures no
less than five inches (5") high.'
10.Section 27, paragraph J is revised to read as follows:
lei. Notices.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this franchise shall
be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by telecopier (fax), or United
States certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed as
follows:
To City:City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention:Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
Telecopier:(909) 694-1999
Copy to:Peter Thorson, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 South Hope Street
Thirty-Eighth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1469
R:krusep\swamdl.crr
To Grantee:CR&R Incorporated
P.O. Box 125
Stanton, California 90680
Attention:David Fahrion
Telecopier:(714) 895-5702
Copy To:CR&R Incorporated
P.O. Box 1208
Perris, California 92572
Attention: David Fahrion
or to such other address as either party may from time to time designate by notice
to the other given in accordance with this Section. Notice shall be deemed
effective on the date personally served or, if mailed, three (3) business days from
the date such notice is deposited in the United States mail.
11. Section 27, paragraph H- the caption is amended to read
"Amendments", not "Prior Agreements and Amendment.'
12. Section 27, paragraph I- the caption is amended to read "Compliance
with Municipal Code", not "Compliance with Franchise Agreement."
13.Paragraph N is added to Section 27, as follows:
" N. No Prior Aareements. This Agreement supersedes all prior
proposals, agreements and understandings between the parties and may not be
changed or terminated orally, and no change or termination of, or attempt to
waive, any of the provisions hereof shall be binding unless in writing and signed
by the parties against whom the same is sought to be enforced."
14. The reference in the second sentence of paragraph H of Exhibit "C"
to "within eighteen (1 8) months from the date of this Franchise Agreement" is
changed to "January 1, 1997.".
15. The sixth sentence of paragraph 1 1 of Exhibit 'D" is revised to read
as follows:
"The landfill tipping fee adjustment shall be a pro-rata pass through of any
tipping fee increase or decrease, and shall be effective at the start of the first full
billing period after the landfill tipping fee is adjusted."
16. This Amendment consists of five (5) pages and no exhibits. Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Franchise Agreement remains in full force and
effect.
R:\rusep\swamdl.crr
GRANTEE CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
David E. Fahrion Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
CR&R Incorporated
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:krusep%swamdl.crr
ITEI\4 17
ORDINANCE NO. 96-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 8.24 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "HABITAT
CONSERVATION" ESTABLISHING NEW AND MODIFYING
EXISTING REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MITIGATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ON THE
HABITAT OF THE STEPHENS'KANGAROO RAT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds and determines that:
A. The Legislature of the State of California has found and declared that certain species
of fish, wildlife and plants are in danger of, or threatened with, extinction due to habitat destruction
and exploitation.
B. The Legislature has further found and declared that these species of fish, wildlife and
plants are of historical, economic and scientific value to the people of this State and the conservation,
protection and enhancement of these species and their habitat is of statewide concern.
C. The Legislature has further found and declared that it is the policy of the State to
conserve, protect, restore, and enhance the habitat of species that are listed as threatened or
endangered, candidates for such listing as well as other species of concern (collectively, listed,
candidates for listing and other species of concern shall hereinafter be referred to as 'Species of
Concern").
D. The Congress of the United States has found and declared that the preservation of
Species of Concern is an important national and regional issue which requires the cooperation of
cities, counties, the states, the federal government and the owners of property affected by these
species.
E. The listing of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat as an endangered species has resulted in
significant adverse economic impacts upon the City and western Riverside County and is likely to
have contributed to the recent decline in property values of not only lands which are occupied, but
also lands which are not occupied by the species.
F. The City, together with the Cities of Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley,
Murrieta, Perris, Riverside and the County of Riverside, has formed the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency ('RCHCA') whose purpose is to plan for, acquire, administer, operate and
maintain land and facilities for ecosystem conservation and the creation of habitat reserves to
I
implement habitat and ecosystem conservation plans and programs for the Species of Concern. The
RCHCA has recently adopted the 'The Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
in Western Riverside County, California' ('SKRHCP') and has been issued an incidental take permit
from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and a Management Authorization from the
California Department of Fish and Game, all of which documents require certain implementation
actions on the part of its members, including the City.
G. The City Council, by its Ordinance No. 90-04, adopted by reference Ordinance No.
663 of the County of Riverside, as the same existed at the time of its adoption by reference. At such
time, Ordinance No. 663, as amended, imposed an impact and mitigation fee of $i,950 per acre to
be used exclusively for the preparation and implementation of a habitat conservation plan for the
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat.
H. The Board of Directors of the RCHCA has recommended to each of its members that
each city and the County of Riverside amend its Ordinances 1) to enact the implementation measures
as set forth in the SKRHCP, the Section 10(a) Permit and the Management Authorization; and, ii)
to reduce the impact and mitigation fee to $500 per acre. The recommendations of the RCHCA with
respect to the Impact and Mitigation Fee is based upon the current cash reserves of the RCHCA, its
likely expenditures during the ensuing three years to implement the terms of the SKRHCP, which
will benefit many other Species of Concern, and to negotiate and develop an ecosystem based
multiple species habitat conservation plan which will protect all species in order to reduce the
likelihood of additional state or federal listings and to support permits to take Species of Concern
should they be listed in the future.
I. The City Council has determined that the benefits accruing to parcels which are
occupied by the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat as well as those which are not so occupied are roughly
proportional and that a meaningful parcel by parcel evaluation of benefits which will accrue to those
parcels as a result of the implementation of the SKRHCP would not result in a meaningful difference
in the amount of fee so imposed.
Section 2. Purl2oses. The purposes of this Ordinance are to adopt and require certain
implementation measures as required by the SKRHCP, the Section 10(a) Permit and the Management
Authorization; to codify existing requirements imposing an Impact and Mitigation Fee to provide
funds to the RCHCA to implement the terms of the SKRHCP; and to reduce the amount of the
existing Impact and Mitigation Fee.
Section 3. Chapter 8.24, 'Habitat Conservation' is added to Title 8 of
the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
Ords\96-17
2
"CHAPTER 8.24
HABITAT CONSERVATION
8.24.010. Definitions. As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the
following meanings:
A. Certificate of Occupancy. 'Certificate of Occupancy' shall mean a certificate of
occupancy as defined by Title 17 the Temecula Municipal Code.
B. Development Permit, "Development Permit" shall mean an on or offsite grading,
building or surface mining permit or mobile home installation permit or mobile home site
preparation permit or any other permit or authorization which permits or authorizes the disturbance
of land.
C. Plan Area. "Plan Area" shall mean all real property located within the City situated
within the boundaries described in Ordinance No. 663 of the County of Riverside, as such ordinance
existedas of February 27, 1990, or within such other boundaries adopted by resolution of the City
Council.
D. Final Inspfction. "Final Inspection' shall mean a final inspection as defined by in the
TemeculaMunicipal Code, or if no definition therein exists, then as such term is defined in the most
current adopted version of the Uniform Building Code, or if no definition there exists, then as such
term is defined by the laws of the State of California.
E. Habitat Conservation Plan. "Habitat Conservation Plan" shall mean a plan prepared
pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. Section 1539
and applicable provisions of the California Endangered Species Act, California Fish and Game Code
Section 2050 et seq.
F. Impact and Mitigation F=. "Impact and Mitigation Fee" shall mean the fee imposed
pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.
G. Parcel. "Parcel" shall mean all real property located within the parcel or parcels for
which a development permit is applied.
8.24.020Bio]oLical Surveys,
A. Prior to the issuance of any Development Permit for any project located within the
boundaries of the Plan Area which meets the following criteria, the applicant for such Development
Permit shall provide the City with a biological survey for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat:
Ords\96-17
3
(1) Until the City has been notified by the Riverside County Habitat Conservation
Area that the Core Reserves as identified in its Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat (SKRHCP) have been completed, any Development Permit for projects within known
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat occupied habitat according to the most recent Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
distribution map available to the City.
(2) Any Development Permit for projects within any Core Reserve as identified in
the SKRHCP.
B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this Section, biological surveys shall not be required in
the following instances:
(1) Emergencies: Actions taken by the city or other public agencies in response
to public emergencies including, but not limited to, floods, earthquakes and fires.
(2) Secondary Structures: Construction of secondary structures including, but not
limited to, garages, granny-flat units and swimming pools on developed lots.
(3) Agriculture: Bona fide agricultural activities which do not involve the
construction of permanent improvements which require building permits.
(4)Fire Prevention: Fire prevention activities as set forth in that certain
Cooperative Agreementregarding Fire Prevention entered into among the City, the California
Department of Fish andGame and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service dated February 16,
1995 and any subsequent amendments thereto.
C. No Development Permit for real property located within the boundaries of the Plan Area
shall be issued or approved without the submission of the biological survey as required by this
Section.
8.24.030Imposition of Impact and MitiLation Fee-
A. Except as otherwise provided in this Section or in Section 8.24.050, all applicants for
Development Permits within the boundaries of the Plan Area shall pay an Impact and Mitigation Fee
of five hundred ($500) dollars per gross acre of the parcel to be developed and the area to be
disturbed for the related offsite improvements. No Development Permit for real property located
within the boundaries of the Plan Area shall be issued or approved without the payment of the Impact
and Mitigation Fee as required by this Section.
B.Impact and Mitigation Fees shall be reduced by seventy-five (75) percent for nonprofit
entities. Forpurposes of this section, nonprofit entities shall be defined as those entities identified
in 26 U.S.C.501(c)(3).
Ords\96-17
4
C. Impact and Mitigation Fees for single family residential development, wherein all lots
within the development are greater than one-half (1h) gross acre in size, shall be two hundred fifty
($250) dollars per residential unit.
D. Impact and Mitigation Fees for agricultural development which requires a
development permit, including, but not limited to, dairy farms and excluding poultry farms and the
construction of single family residences in connection with said agricultural development, shall be
$1.00 per square foot of the buildings to be constructed; provided, however, at no time shall such
fee exceed the amount required to be paid if a fee of $500 per gross acre were applied to the parcel
proposed for agricultural development.
8.24.040Payment of Impact and Mitigation Fee,
A. The Impact and Mitigation Fee shall be paid upon issuance of a Development Permit
or a Certificate of Occupancy or upon final inspection, whichever first occurs. In those cases where
a Development Permit has been previously issued and Impact and Mitigation Fees have previously
been paid pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter or Ordinance No. 663 of the County of Riverside
but such Development Permit has expired, the applicant for a new Development Permit on the same
property, upon submission of proof of such payment satisfactory to the Community Development
Director shall pay the Impact and Mitigation Fee less the amount previously paid. In the event the
fee previously paid was more than the Impact and Mitigation Fee, the applicant shall not be entitled
to a rebate.
B. The Impact and Mitigation Fee payable for parcels for which a surface mining permit
is sought shall be paid upon submission of an application for a special inspection permit prior to the
commencement of the mining operation or in the alternative, may be paid in increments upon
submission of an application for a special inspection permit prior to the commencement of each
phase of the mining operation authorized by the surface mining permit. Each increment of payment
shall be equal to $500 multiplied by the sum of (1) the total number of acres of land within the
applicable phase pursuant to the surface mining permit; and, (2) the quotient which results from
dividing the total number of acres of land covered by the surface mining permit and subject to this
Chapter which are prohibited from disturbance or designated as setback or buffer areas pursuant to
the surface mining permit, by the total number of approved phases. The total number of acres of
land within each phase shall be determined by a physical survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or
registered civil engineer.
8.24.050 Exemptions. For purposes of this Chapter, applicants for Development
Permits for the following types of development shall not be required to pay an Impact and Mitigation
Fee unless such applicant voluntarily participates in order to mitigate the disturbance of habitat
occupied by the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat.
A. Reconstruction of any structure damaged or destroyed by fire or other natural causes;
Ords\96-17
B.Rehabilitation or remodeling of existing structures, or additions to existing structures;
C. Development of any parcel for which the California Department of Fish and Game
and the Untied States Fish and Wildlife Serve has approved other mitigation procedures; provided,
however, that in the event the cost of such mitigation measures equal an amount less than the total
amount of the Impact and Mitigation Fee imposed hereby, the applicant for a Development Permit
shall pay the difference between the cost of the approved mitigation measures and the Impact and
Mitigation Fee which would otherwise be payable pursuant to the terms of this Chapter;
D. Development of any parcel used by local, State or federal goverranents for
governmental purposes;
E.Development of any parcel for which an Impact and Mitigation Fee has been
previouslypaid to the City pursuant to this Chapter or Ordinance No. 663 of the County of
Riverside. However, in instances where the fee previously paid was the fee for single family
residential development, wherein all lots within the development were greater than one-half (1/2)
gross acre in size, and the applicant for a development permit subsequently requests an increase in
residential density or a change from a residential to a non-residential use, or in instances where the
parcel has previously been developed for agricultural purposes and the applicant for a development
permit subsequently requests a change from an agricultural to a residential, commercial or industrial
use, the fee shall be recalculated for the new density or use pursuant to the provisions of this
Chapter. Any difference between the recalculated fee and the previously paid fee shall be required
to be paid by the applicant, but in the event the fee previously paid is more than the Impact and
Mitigation Fee imposed by this Chapter, the applicant shall not be entitled to a rebate;
F. The construction of public utility transmission facilities. Said exemption shall not
include substations, treatment facilities or pumping stations.
G. Development of any parcel for construction of a detached or attached accessory living
quarter which will be constructed on a parcel of real property upon which the main building to which
the detached or attached living quarters is accessory has previously been lawfully constructed.
8.24.060 Relationshil2 to Existing Ordinances,. To the extent the provisions of this
Chapter conflict with any provisions of Ordinance No. 663 of the County of Riverside, as amended,
the provisions of this Chapter shall apply. This Chapter shall not require the refund of any amounts
paid to the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 663. "
Section 4. Severability. This Ordinance and the various parts, sections and clauses
thereof are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause is
adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby.
If any part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause of this Ordinance, or its application to any person
or entity, is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall affect
Ords\96-17
6
only such part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause of this Ordinance, or such person or entity;
and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining parts, sentences, paragraphs, sections or clauses
of this Ordinance, or its application to other persons or entities. The City Council hereby declares
that this Ordinance would have been adopted had such unconstitutional or invalid part, sentence,
paragraph, section or clause of this Ordinance not been included herein; or had such person or entity
been expressly exempted from the application of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of August, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords\96-17
7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 96-17 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of August, 1996, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on
the 27th day of August, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMIEMEBERS:
NOES: COUNC]ILMIEM[BERS:
ABSENT:COUNCIILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Ords\96-17
8
TEMECULA CON4NAUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEI\4 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD AUGUST 13, 1996
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:46 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Vice President Jeff Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Ford to approve Consent Calendar
Items No. 1-3, with Director Stone abstaining on Item No. 1. The motion was unanimously
carried with President Roberts absent.
1 Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 23, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Ford
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone
2Combinina Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exl2end*tures and Chanaes On Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the
Year Ended June 30, 1996.
r:\minutes.csd\08 1 396 -1-
2.2Approve the transfer of $18,800 in Service Level C budget from account
#1 93-180-999-5415 'Landscape Maintenance' to account 193-180-999-5240
"Utilities".
3Release of Warranty Bond for Voorburg Park - Tract 2262Z (Located on Nicolas Road
and North General Kearny Road)
3.1Authorize the release of the Warranty Bond for the construction of Voorburg
Park, Tract No. 22627 - Van Daele Development Corporation.
3.2 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and Surety.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None given.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Ford to adjourn at 7:48 PM to a
meeting on August 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with President Roberts
absent.
Ron Roberts, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
District Secretary
r:\minutes.csd\08 1 3 9 6 -2-
ITEI\4 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Amendment to TCSD Landscape Maintenance Contract
tn
PREPARED BY ruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors:
Approve contract amendmentof $19,500 with Excel Landscape, Inc. to provide landscape
maintenance services for theSports Park Improvement Pro'ect for FY 1 996-97.
BACKGROUND: Excel Landscape, Inc. is the current landscape maintenance contractor for
the Rancho California Sports Park. The Community Services Department recommends adding
the maintenance of the new Sports Park Improvement to the landscape maintenance contract
with Excel Landscape, Inc. This area (approximately ten acres) includes the skate park, roller
hockey rink, new parking lot, and the surrounding landscape. The maintenance cost associated
with this addition is $1,950 per month.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the addition to the contract with Excel Landscape, Inc.,
is $1 9,500. These costs have already been included in the Community Services Department
Budget for FY 1 996-97.
R @,A(3END@CONAMND 896 13, 19%
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The Agreement dated May 11, 1993, between the City of Temecula, and Excel Landscape, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:
RE:Landscape Maintenance Services
Section 1
Tenn of the Acreement is extended through June 30, 1997.
Section 2
The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following:
Landscape maintenance services per City of Temecula Specifications for the Rancho California
Sports Park Improvement (an addition of approximately 10 acres). This site shall be added
to the existing Agreement beginning September 10, 1996.
Section 3
Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the Amendment
and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $1,950 per month.
Section 4
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONTRACTOR CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
Ronald H. Roberts
Excel Landscape, Inc. President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEI\4 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Board of Directors
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Agreement for Softball Officiating Services
PREPARED BY:Julie Crowe-Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:That the Board of Directors:
Approve agreement between the City of Temecula and the Margarita Officials Association for
providing City softball league officiating services.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula, Community Services Department
offers year round adult softball leagues as part of the city-wide sports program. The Softball
Leagues generally run fourteen weeks in duration, with two (2) seasons per year. The program
attracts approximately 130 softball teams per year consisting of 1,950 individual participants.
On July 12, 1996, the City of Temecula released a Request for Proposal (RFP) to select a
qualified firm to provide officiating services for the City's Adult Softball Program. Officiating
services are considered a professional service and are essential to the operation of a successful
and well organized adult sport league/program. Three (3) firms responded to the RFP: Margarita
Officials Association; Tri-County Officials, Inc.; and Valley Umpires Association.
A Review Committee comprised of the Recreation Superintendent, Recreation Supervisor, and
a Senior Management Analyst reviewed the proposals and ranked the firms based on
references, years of experience, past performance, and the ability to provide officiating
services. As a result, the Margarita Officials Association was selected as the highest ranked
firm to provide this service. This Association has twenty-eight (28) years of softball officiating
experience and has been providing this service to the City of Temecula since February, 1991.
Their performance in providing officiating services to the City of Temecula for the past five
years has been excellent.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost per official is $22.00 per game, for an annual
estimated cost of $19,800. Unencumbered funds exist in account # 190-183-999-5380.
R:\CROWEJ\STAFFRPT.WPD August 15, 1996
AGREEMEENT BETWEEN @GARITA OFF'ICIALS ASSOCIATION AND THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMIENT, TEMEECULA, CALIEFORNIA
This agreement is made and entered into this Thirteen day of September, 1996 by and
between the Temecula Community Services District, Temecula, California, hereinafter called
CSD, and Margarita Officials Association, hereinafter referred to as the MOA.
in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
I .TERMS. The terms of this Agreement shall be in force commencing the 13th
day of September, of 1996, and terminating the 30th day of June, 1998, subject
to prior termination or option to renew as set forth in paragraph 8 below.
2.COMPENSATION. The CSD shall pay the MOA at the rate of $20.00 per
official per game, one official, and $16.00 per official per game when two or
more officials are requested for a game, plus a ten percent (IO %) Association
Fee. Bilag by the Association shall be made to the CSD monthly, in writin,-,,
for all games played the previous month. The fees are payable to the
Association no later than thirty (30) working days from receipt of the birin-
3 .SCHEDULING. The CSD shall schedule all games as to the time and location.
A complete schedule of games shall be furnished to the MOA in sufficient time
as to allow for scheduling of officials. When a game is rescheduled or canceled
after notification, the MOA shall be apprised at least six (6) hours in advance.
If this time frame is not met, the CSD shall pay $10.00 fee for each official
assigned.
4.FORFEITLTRES. Officials shall appear at the game site at least fifteen (15)
minutes prior to the scheduled starting time. Should officials fail to appear for
a game, the MOA shall forfeit the fee for each official who did not show.
Games not played due to the nonappearance of one or both scheduled teams,
inclement weather, or other misfortune will be paid for by CSD at the rate of
R: \mcgavria@ ultsprt\softbaU\jnoa\96.97cont.
$10.00 per official, provided an official(s) is present. Should a game in
progress be canceled or terminated for any reason, the CSD shall pay all fees
due as if the game was played.
5.PROTESTS. Should an official, for any reason within his/her control, cause a
game to be protested, the MOA shall submit a verbal report to the CSD of the
circumstances on the following day and a written report shall be provided, if
required, within five (5) days. Officials shall be provided by the MOA, at no
cost to the CSD for any reschedule game resulting from a protest that is upheld.
6.RESPONSIEBILI@ OF THE MOA:
a.Provide qualified officials for all scheduled CSD games when the MOA
is properly notified.
b.Assist the CSD on protests. This includes representing the official(s) at
protest meetings, as required.
C.Notification of the CSD when a grievance has been filed by an official
or the MOA. This notification shall be in writing not more than five (5)
days after the grievance is filed with the MOA.
d.Be responsible for providing, maintaining, and repairing the equipment,
materials, supplies, etc., necessary for the proper conduct of the
officiating to be performed.
7.RESPONSEBILITIES OF THE CSD:
a.The CSD has the right to refuse the services of any MOA official for
cause. The CSD shall notify the MOA in writing within five (5) days of
the cause.
b.The CSD shall provide fields in playable condition and set up necessary
equipment for games.
C.The CSD to provide the MOA with a copy of all By-Laws and rules
unique to the conduct of their games.
8.NATION. This agreement shall terminate on the prescribed date.
Either party retains the right and option to terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the other.
R: \incgavrla\adultsprt\softbatl\moaN96.97cont.
9.ASSIGNMENT. Neither CSD nor the MOA shall have the right or power to
assign or transfer this Agreement, or any interest in it, without the written
consent of the other.
10.PERFORMANCE. MOA shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best
of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
MOA shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices
utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of MOA
hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
11.INDEMNIFICATION. The MOA agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any
kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or
incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or
damage to property arising out of MOA's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions
in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting
only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
12.INSURANCE REQLTIREMENTS. MOA shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages
to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
work hereunder by the MOA, its agents, representatives, or employees.
(1)Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a.Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
b.Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(2)Minimum Limits of Insurance. MOA shall maintain limits no less than:
a.General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
R: \incgu,ria \adultsprt\softball\inoa\96.97cont.
required occurrence limit.
b.Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
C.Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(3)Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the
option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers; or the MOA shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
(4)Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a.The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the MOA; products and completed
operations of the MOA; premises owned, occupied or used by the
MOA; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
MOA. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope
of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers.
b.For any claims related to this project, the MOA's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be
excess of the MOA's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
C.Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect cover-age
provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
d.The MOA's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
R: \mcgavrla\adultspri@oftbaH\moa\96.97cont.
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the
limits of the insurer's liability.
e.Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that cover-age shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by
either party, reduced in cover-age or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested.
has been given to the City.
(5)Acc=tability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VH, unless otherwise
acceptable to the City.
(6)Verification of Coverage. MOA shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements
are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on
its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. AU
endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the MOA's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies,
including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these
specifications.
13.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a.MOA is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on
behalf of MOA shall at all times be under MOA's exclusive direction and
control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have
control over the conduct of MOA or any of MOA's officers, employees or
agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. MOA shall not at any time or
in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. MOA shall not
incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever
against City, or bind City in any manner.
b.No employee benefits shall be available to MOA in connection with the
R: \incgavrla\udultsprt\softbaU\znoa\96.97cont.
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to MOA as
provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to MOA for performing services hereunder for City. City
shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to MOA for injury or
sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
14.LEGAL RESPONSI]BILJTTES, The MOA shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
MOA shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The
City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the MOA to comply with this section.
15.NOTICES, Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal
service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not
limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of
delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or
at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To MOA:
16.GOVERNING LAW. The City and MOA understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.
Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal,
superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
R:\mcgavrLa@ultspr't\softball\moa\96.97cont.
17.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. AU prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings,
representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and
shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement
based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each par-ty's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18.AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENF. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of MOA warrants and represents that he or she
has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the MOA and has the
authority to bind MOA to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
"IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMEECULA
BY -.
Karel S. Lindemans
Mayor
Attest:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
R: @cgavrla\adulLsprt\softbafl\inoa\96.97cont.
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION
June S. Greek, City Clerk Date Phil Gutierrez, Assignment Secretary Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Date
Ronald H. Roberts Date
President Temecula Community Services District
R:\mcguvrla\adultsprt\softbaE\moa\96.97cont.
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY c,
FINANCE DIRE(
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Departmental Report
PREPARED BY Gail L. Zigier, Administrative Secretary
Construction of the Parkview Fire Station began on January 3, 1996. The wood frame
construction is nearing completion. Construction of the roof and installation of interior
mechanical and electrical improvements are presently underway. Drywall installation will
begin the last week of August. Construction of the street improvements will begin within
two weeks. The project should be completed by December, 1996.
The Rancho California Creek Restoration Project began construction on May 24, 1996. The
concrete walkway and landscape improvements are complete. Installation of the irrigation
system and planting of trees along the streambed is presently underway. This project is
scheduled to be completed in September, 1996.
Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project is under construction. The restroom/snack
bar exterior is complete. The landscape improvements are currently under construction.
Installation of the play area surface will follow. The project is scheduled to be completed by
November, 1996.
A contract was awarded to Skytec, Inc., for the construction of the City of Temecula
Maintenance Yard facility. A pre-construction meeting is scheduled for mid-August, 1996.
Construction is scheduled to begin in September, 1996.
The Alhambra Group is preparing the construction documents for second submittal for
Margarita Community Park. The first phase of the Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot
lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, and pedestrian walkways. The bid will also
include additive alternates for a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and improvements to the
adjacent school district baseball fields. Staff is working with the School District to bring
forward a recommendation for a joint use agreement between the school district and the
City for improvements to and maintenance of the fields.
Escrow has been opened on the Temecula Community Center and Rotary Park site. It is
anticipated escrow will close at the end of August, 1996. A license agreement between the
City of Temecula and the Temecula Town Association(TTA) was approved by the City
Council on July 23, 1996 to allow the TTA to lease a portion of the facility from the City for
SLIA@@ @ is, igm
a maximum of 3 % years. Staff is looking at various recreation and human services
programs, which will be implemented when the City takes possession of this facility in
September, 1996.
The City Hall modifications are well underway. The contractor has completed most of the
tenant improvements downstairs and the first floor is being painted. Second floor tenant
improvements should be completed by mid-September. It is anticipated this project will be
completed by the end of September, 1996.
R.'A@@ @ is, im
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEI\4 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD AUGUST 13, 1996
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
7:48 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR.
Agency Member Stone stated he would abstain on Items 1, 3, 4 and 5. It was moved by
Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Ford to approve Consent
Calendar Items No. 1-5, with Agency Member Stone abstaining on Items 1, 3, 4 and 5. The
motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Roberts absent.
1 Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 23, 1996.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
2Combbnina Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exl2enditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1996
2.1Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the
Year Ended June 30, 1996.
2.2Approve the transfer of $12,600 in the Low/Mod Fund from #1 65-199-999-
5248 'Consulting Services" to account 165-199-999-5246.
Minutes.rda\081 396 -1-
3Authorization to Extend Aareement for Redevelol2ment Agency Consulting Serviau
3.1Authorize the Chairperson to execute an extension of the agreement for
Redevelopment Agency consulting services with PMW Associates subject to
the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final
form of the agreement.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
4Professional Enaineerdng Services with Moffatt and Nichol Enaineers for Indel2endent
Check of Bridge Improvement Plans and Specifications - First Street
4.1Award a contract for Professional Engineering Services for Independent Check
of Bridge Improvement Plans and Specifications to Moffatt and Nichol
Engineers for $26,651.00 and authorize the Executive Director to execute the
contract.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
5Professional Services Agreement - Hazpak Inc.
5.1Authorize additional work contained in Amendment No. 1 of the Scope of
Work for the Professional Services Agreement with Hazpak, Inc.
5.2 Authorize the total contract amount of $11,21 1.00 with Hazpak, Inc.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Minutes.rda\081 396 -2-
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Ford to adjourn at
7:50 PM to a meeting on August 27, 1996, 7:00 P.M., Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with
Agency Members Roberts absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
Minutes.rda\08 1 396 -3-
ITEI\4 2
APPROVA
CITY ATTO
FINANCE DI
CITY MANA
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM:Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Interim Funding for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, the
Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and the Temecula
Valley Film Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members approve an interim funding request for the Temecula Valley Chamber
of Commerce, the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and the
Temecula Valley Film Council.
DISCUSSION:
At the beginning of each year, the Redevelopment Agency considers funding for the Temecula
Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and the
Temecula Valley Film Commission. Staff is in the process of preparing the reports requested
by the Agency Members. Since the report is not expected to be completed until September,
staff is recommending that the Agency authorize interim funding of $25,000 for the Temecula
Valley Economic Development Corporation, $25,000 for the Chamber of Commerce and
$10,000 for the Temecula Valley Film Commission. These amounts are approximately half of
the FY1995-96 funding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funds for these organizations are budgeted in the Redevelopment Agency.
ITEN4 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Contract Amendment No. 1
Purchase Order No. 18284
Project No. PW 95-08
Professional Services with Tom Dodson & Associates for Environmental
Consulting Services for the First Street and Western Bypass Corridor
Bridges over Murrieta Creek and Phases I and 11 of the Western Bypass
Corridor
PREPARED BY: John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency Members approve the Contract Amendment No.1 for
Professional Services for Environmental Consulting Services for the First Street and Western
Bypass Corridor Bridges over Murrieta Creek and Phases I and 11 of the Western Bypass Corridor
to Tom Dodson & Associates for $10,000.00 and authorize the Chairperson to execute the
contract.
BACKGROUND:
On October 15, 1995, the City Manager executed an agreement with Tom Dodson &
Associates, to provide biological surveys and prepare a mitigation program necessary for the
environmental permits for First Street extension and Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor in
an amount of $6,770.00. The First Street Extension design budget funded payment of that
contract. The City Manager approved the contract since the amount was less than $1 0,000.00.
Pursuant to discussions and meetings with the environmental agencies; State of California
Department of Fish and Game, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Water Resources Control Board
and Army Corps. of Engineers; the biological surveys were expanded to include the Arroyo toad
for the First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridges over Murrieta Creek and preparation
of the public notice for the Army Corps of Engineers permit to expedite the permit processing.
Biological survey for Phase 11 of the Western Bypass Corridor from Vincent Moraga Road to
Rancho California Road has also been added to the scope. A more detailed description of the
expanded scope of work is included in the attached proposal from Tom Dodson & Associates.
-I- r. \mgdrpt\96\09 13\dodson. @ajp
Public Works staff requests the Redevelopment Agency Members approve the Contract
Amendment No. 1 with Tom Dodson & Associates in the amount of $10,000.00 for the
following tasks:
Public notice preparation $4,000.00
Arroyo Toad Survey $3,000.00
Biological survey and evaluating the site for
the California Gnatcatcher$3,000.00
Total: $10,000.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is part of the First Street Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by the
Redevelopment Agency Funds. Funds are available in Account No. 280-199-807-5802 for the
professional services contract of $10,000.00.
Attachments:
Contract Amendment No. 1
-2- r.\agdrptk96\0813\d@.@ajp
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
-3-
r.\mgdrpt\96\0813\dodson.&Wajp
NO. I
TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 18394
The agreement dated October 15, 1995 between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, and Tom Dodson & Associates, Inc. (Dodson) (herein referred to as "Agreement') is
hereby amended as follows:
RE:Environmental Consulting Services with Tom Dodson & Associates, Inc. For the First
Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridges over Murrieta Creek and Phases I and ][I of
the Western Bypass Corridor
Section 1
The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the required environmental surveys and analyses
for the First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridges over Murrieta Creek and Phases I and
II of the Western Bypass Corridor as required by the environmental agencies. The Scope of
Services are identified in Exhibit A .
Section 2
Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment.
The total cost of this project is summarized below:
A. Approved Contract $6,770.00
B. Amendment No. 1 $10@000-00
Total: $16,770.00
Section 3
AR other terms and conditions of the Agreement shau remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement of the above written
date.
REDEVELOP AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEM[ECULA
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
CONSULTANT
By:
Tom Dodson, President (Date)
R--\cio\vmi@@r,w95-ng\dod@n. agr/.;@
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Date:
EXYIMTT A
TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES
463 N. SIERRA WAY
SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92410
(909) 884-9700 FAX (909) 889-8050
FOAR 6 1996
-f'y C)r: t-
March 3, 1996 Cl -FEM'-CULA
ENG)trr-ERING DEPARTVEiqT
Mr. John Pourkazemi
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
DearJohn:
This letter contains a proposal to complete the additional work necessary to acquire the Section
404 Permit (Corps of Engineers, COE) and the 1601 Stream Alteration Agreement (State
Department of Fish and Game, DFG) for the two bridge crossings associated with the First Street
and Western Bypass Corridor bridges. It also contains a proposal to provide the required
documentation to support the extension of the Western Bypass from Vincent Moraca to Rancho
California.
As you are aware, my firm, Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA), is preparing additional data
requested by the COE to address practical alternatives. In the process of negotiating the
processing of the 404 permit with the Corps, we have been requested to prepare the Public Notice
(PN) and supporting documentation to speed up the processing. These additional requirements'
have caused TDA to reach our current contract limit for the 404 permit and 1601 Agreement
effort. I am requesting an additional $4,000 to complete the processin- with the Corps and DFG.
These funds will be expended on a time and materials basis as required to negotiate the permits
and complete the documentation required by the COE and DFG.
In addition to processing the permit/acreement, the agencies have requested that we conduct a
survey for the @i-oyo toad within the bri(ioe a!' L:
i,ynniej,t. %,is sa re@-,arice, iyiy start ecoiouist,
visited the site with the biologist from the Fish and Wildlife Service, and they do not believe the
Arroyo Toad is an issue at this location, but a request was made to verify this assumption. The
survey is required for six days and nights and our associate herpetologist, Mr. Robert Goodman,
wi 'II need to be in the survey in mid-March. The fee for this effort is $-' ),OOO and it would be
directly in support of the permit/a-reement acqu's't'
i i ions.
For the extension of the Western Bypass to Rancho California, we have identified three tasks that
wi 'II need to be completed in order to carry-out this project. The first two steps are preparing a
general biological survey of the route and performinc, an evaluation of the site for the California
Gnatcatchei-. L'sa can complete the biological sui-ve@,, includin the search of the Natural
I _g
Diversity Data Base, foi- $I,')00. The ,natcatcher Survey protocol requires nine site visits and the
fee for this effort will be $I, 700. It will be essential to have the alignment surveyed and Identified
on an lar@e scale aerial photo, or on the cyround for these survevs to- be effective.
Based on preliminary information and assumpt' ions, we do not anticipate any significant bioloalcal
resources to be identified in the Western Bypass alignment from Vincent Moraaa to Rancho
California since this appears to be a chemise chaparral habitat that is considered common, If the
if
surveys verl y this assumption, then it will be possible to prepare an Addendum to the certified
Environmental Impact Report for the Old Town project, TDA can prepare this Addendum for the
City or the City can prepare it utilizing the information contained in the reports. Given the past
sensitivity of this project, it will be necessary to prepare a fairly formal Addendum which must
include substantiation on all of the environmental issues contained in the City's Environmental
Checl,list Form.
The pertinent sections of the State CEQA Guidelines are 15 162 and 15 164. These sections define
the steps that must be complied with in order for the Addendum to be adopted. Althouch the
statute and Guidelines are silent reaardina the filing of a Notice of Determination (NOD) for an
Addendum, I believe it is essential to file such a notice to ensure that the statute of limitations is
minimized to the ')O days allowed under the statute. The filin- of the NOD should be associated
with the Council's decision to approve the extension of the Bypass to Rancho California as a
crraded alignment. TDA can prepare this documentation, assuming input from the City staff on
the traffic issues at the intersection of the Bypass and Rancho California, for a $2,000 fee.
I believe this covers the modifications to our existing contract that will be necessary to complete
the 404 and 1601 permit/a-reement process and the environmental compliance for the Bypass
extension. We will need to initiate several of these field surveys within the next two weeks. If
these modifications are acceptable, please make the revisions to our existing contract so we can
proceed with the work effort in a timely manner. Do not hesitate to give me a call if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
TomDodson
cc@Zev Buffman
John D- LeWay
2
ITEA4 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM:h Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Nelson, Director of Community Services
DATE:t 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW95-26
The Sixth Street Parking Project
PREPARED BY: John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency:
1 .Award a contract for Project No. PW95-26, the Sixth Street Parking Project, to General
Consolidated Constructors, Inc., for $593,000.00 and authorize the Executive Director
to execute the contract.
2.Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $59,300.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On March 12, 1996, the Redevelopment Agency approved the master plan for the Sixth Street
Parking Project and authorized staff to solicit public construction bids. This project includes the
construction of a public parking facility which would accommodate 80 parking spaces, including
4 parking spaces for disabled parking (one van accessible). Electrical Conduits will be installed
for future connection to electrical vehicle charging stations. An approximately 1,600 square
foot public restroom facility is also included as well as all associated on and offsite public
improvements and streetscape (boardwalk, street lights, etc.) on Front Street, Sixth Street and
Mercedes Street along the project frontage in compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan
requirements.
The engineer's estimate for this project was $580,000.00.
r.\agdrpt\96\0827\pw95-26.awd/aip
Six (6) bids were Publicly opened on August 15, 1996 and results are as follows:
Base Bid
1. General Consolidated Constructors, Inc $ 593,000.00
2. West Coast Construction $601,995.00
3. Sean Malek Engineering & Construction $630,120.00
4. Mahr Construction $641,346.00
5. Micon Engineering, Inc $719,000.00
6. Kunze, Inc $817,700.00
General Consolidated Constructors, Inc., the contractor, has not performed any work for the
City. The references given by the contractor were contacted and the owners were satisfied
with the performance of the contractor.
The construction schedule is one hundred and twenty five (125) working days. The total
contract time includes the landscape maintenance period of 65 working days. Work is expected
to begin in September, 1996, and be completed by April, 1997.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The construction of the Sixth Street Parking Project is a Capital Improvement Project. Adequate
funds are available for the construction contract of $593,000.00 and 1 0% contingency in the
amount of $59,300.00 for a total cost of $652,300.00 in the Capital Improvement Program
Account No. 280-199-804-5804.
ATTACHMENT:
1 Contract
rkaodrpt%96\0827\pw95-26.awdlaip
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-26
SIXTH STREET PARKING LOT
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of August, 1996, by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic, hereinafter
referred to as "AGENCY", and General Consolidated Constructors, Inc., hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That AGENCY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
l.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-26, SIXTH STREET
PARKING LOT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments
thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1 992
Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest
version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the
Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-26 SIXTH STREET
PARKING LOT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW95-26, SIXTH STREET PARKING LOT.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that
only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\ci p\p roi e cts\p w9 5- 2 6\co ntract/ajp
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2.SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide
and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-26
SIXTH STREET PARKING LOT
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by AGENCY.
3.AGENCY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of
CITY or its authorized representatives.
4.CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. AGENCY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: FIVE HUNDRED NINETY-
THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($593,000.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED TWENTY
FIVE (125) working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by AGENCY.
Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by AGENCY.
5.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the Agency Members, except that the
Executive Director is hereby authorized by the Agency Members to make, by written order, changes
or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the Agency
Members.
6. PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A.Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City
Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in
such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer
may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis
for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B.Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the Agency, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum
equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid
schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day
of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered,
or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of fine
payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Releas@
with the AGENCY on forms provided by the AGENCY.
CONTRACT CA-2 r:kci p\p roje cts\p w 9 5- 26\c ontract/ajp
C.Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied
by a certificate signed by the Executive Director, stating that the work for which payment
is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that
the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial
payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the
work.
D.Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant
to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
7.WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
AGENCY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
$25,000 - $75,000 180 days 3%
$75,000 - $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1 % of amount
in excess of $500,000
8.LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to AGENCY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant
to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not
be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the
fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by AGENCY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify AGENCY of any such delay.
9.WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to AGENCY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related
to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the
acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the
AGENCY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release
and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
10.PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the Agency Members has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall
post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage
rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8,
1 775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\p rojects\p w 9 5- 2 6\co ntract/ajp
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the AGENCY,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker,
or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
ii.TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend AGENCY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the AGENCY.
1 3.GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to AGENCY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
14.CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any Agency officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the AGENCY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
1 5.CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT, After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the Executive Director his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items In connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
i 6.NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance
of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to AGENCY.
1 7.BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the AGENCY.
1 8.I-NSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by AGENCY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\p rojects\p w9 5- 2 6\co ntract/ai p
19.DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
21.WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
431 74 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first
above written.
DATED:CONTRACTOR
GENERAL CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTORS,
INC.
1888 W. Sixth St
Corona, California 91720
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\ci p\p rojects\p w9 5- 2 6\co ntractiajp
ITE 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNE'
DIRECTOR OF F
CITY MANAGEF
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Redevelopment Agency
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Amendment to Ground Lease With Dual Development Inc. (Sixth
and Front Streets)
PREPARED BY:hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:That the Redevelopment Agency:
1 .Approve the First Amendment to Ground Lease by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Dual Development Inc.
2.Authorize the City Clerk to record the original lease agreement and this
amendment.
BACKGROUND: On March 13, 1996, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula entered into a thirty (30) year ground lease agreement with three (3) five year options
with Dual Development Inc. for a portion of vacant, City-owned property located at the corner
of Sixth and Front Streets. The lease allows Dual Development Inc. to construct a public
transportation and retail facility which will include the Temecula Shuttle, snack bar, restaurant,
and other minor retail uses.
Pursuant to the terms of the original agreement, the ground lease was scheduled to commence
on July 1, 1996. However, due to additional design considerations for the 6th Street
improvements, it is recommended that a new commencement date of November 1, 1996, be
established for the term of the lease.
The amendment also reflects the change in addresses for the new City Hall and the City
Attorney's office. All other terms of the lease agreement will remain the same.
The final construction plans and specifications have been approved and the award of the
construction contract for these improvements is scheduled for the Redevelopment Agency on
August 27, 1996. Grading of the site is proposed to begin on September 15, 1996, and
construction of the retaining walls, certification of the building pad, and other improvements
R-\yu@\shW".r& 0827%
are scheduled for completion prior to November 1, 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: 1 . First Amendment to the Agreement.
2.Original Ground Lease Agreement dated 3/13/96.
R.\yasinobk@@.rda 0927%
RECORDED AT REQUEST OF
AND RECORDED
RETURN TO:
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
pursuant to Government Code
Sections 6103 and 27383
MST AMENDTO GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPAGENCY OF THE CITY OF CULA AND
DUAL DEVELOPINC., dba TEMECULA SHUTTLE
THIS FTRST AMENDMENT TO GROLTND LEASE is made and entered into
as of August 27, 1996 by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a
public body, corporate and politic, as Lessor (hereafter 'Agency"), and Dual Development,
Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle, a California corporation, as tenant (hereafter "Tenant"). The
parties agree as follows:
1 . This First Amendment to Ground @ is made with respect to the
following facts, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the parties:
a. On March 13, 1996, the parties entered into that certain
entitled "Ground Lease by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula and Dual Development, Inc., Temecula Shuttle." (the '@');
b. The property which is leased to the Tenant pursuant to the
is generally described as approximately 16,000 square feet at the comer of Sixth Street
and Front Street and is legally described and depicted on Exhibit A., attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in fun; and
C. The parties desire to establish a new commencement date for the
term of the Lease in order to accommodate the work preparatory to commencement of
construction.
R:\zigiorgXdooRea.se
August 15, 1996
2.Section 2. A. of the Lease is hereby amended to read as
follows:
'A. Initial Teroa, Unless sooner terminated or extended as
provided in this Lease, the term of this Lease shall be thirty (30) years
commencing on November 1, 1996 and ending October 31, 2026.
Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in
this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shall include any
extension of the term of this Lease.
3. Sections 4.B. and 4.C. of the Lease are hereby amended to
read as follows:
'B. On the first five year anniversary of this Lease November
1, 2001, and on each subsequent five year anniversary during the
initial term and extended term, if any, of this Lease, the Base Rent
described at subsection "An above shall be increased by an amount
which is 8% greater than the Base Rent (including previous rent
adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year
period.
"C. On the first twentieth year anniversary of this Lease
November 1, 2016, Agency shall cause the property to be
reappraised at its then existing fair market value, and the Minimum
Annual Rental shall be adjusted to ten percent (10%) of the appraised
fair market value. Thereafter, on each subsequent five year
anniversary of this Lease, including extensions, if any, the Minimum
Annual Rental shall be increased by an amount which is ten percent
(10%) greater than the Base Rent (including previous rental
adjustments) applicable for the immediately preceding five year
period.
4.Section 25 B. of the Lease is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"B. Each term and condition of this Lease shall also be
deemed to be a covenant. A default under the Promissory Note in the
amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) to be
entered into between the Agency and Lessee for the development of
the Premises which has not been fully cured with the time required
therein, shall constitute a default under this Lease.'
R:\zigiorg\doollea. &a 2 ALigust 16, 1996
5.Section 32 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows:
'Notices and Paymenta, All notices required under this Lease,
including change of address, shall be in writing, and all notices and
payments shall be addressed as follows:
'Agency:Executive Director
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
'Copy of Notices Only to:
Peter M. Thorson
Richards, Watson & Gershon
333 South Hope Street, 38th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
"Tenant:Dual Development Inc., dba Temecula
Shuttle
41920 6th Street, Suite H
Temecula, California 92590
"Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other,
designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one
specified above. Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt by
personal delivery or upon deposit in the United States mail, certified
or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid.n
6. Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, all
other terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
R:\zigiorg\dooRea.se 3 August 15, 1996
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First
Amendment to Lease to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of
the date first written above.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Patricia H. Birdsall
Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
DUAL DEVELOPMENT INC.
By
Kathleen Dool, President
By
Edward Dool, Vice President
R:XzigiorgNdoolioa. me 4 August 15, 1996
EXHIBIT"A"
That porcion of Lot I of T@ Map 23925, as shown by Map an file in Book 209 of
Maps at pages 21 through 23, Records of Rivcrride County, Califo@ described as
fo.Uows:
B at the most westrzly comr-r of said Lot I-.
Thence North 44' 2.5'45' along the ncrtbwcstctly line of said Lot, a dis=r-c
of 147.87 feet;
T'nence South 45' 34' 15" a distance of 26.98 feet;
Tban= South 44' 25'45" W@ a distance of 18.33 fdat;
Thence South 45' 30'01' East, a distaace of 2.21
'Mence South 05' 45' 17" We@ a di=mce of 35.51 f@
Thence South 45' 30'01' East, a distance of 68.97 feet;
Tbence South 14' 29'59' West, a distance of 36.24
Thin= South 4.4' 29'59' West, a @ce of 9.50 feet;
Thence South 45' 30' 01' East, a distance of 11.62 feet to a point in the
northwes@y right-of-way line of 6th Street as shown on said map;
Thence South 44' 25'43' West along @d right-of-way line, a distance of 43.98
@nce South 859 53' 32' West along said right-of-way Ene, a dis=ce of 22.69
feet to a @t in the northeasterly right-of-way line of Front Stmt as shovin on said map;
Thence North 45' 30' 01' West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 134-92
f@- to the Point of Beginning.
9SMI F4rdm
Cont@g 0.@'7 acres, mcre or less.
pREp UNDER MY SIJPERVISION:
F. Li @ 15 (,
@@ F,. Webb, L.S. 5529 I)=/ i
Pr--pared by: &i-
@- ed by:
SCAI I-=So,
ERCEDES06STREET
I Lw MTANM
Ll N@5,45-E 147.3-r
L2 N4425'4rE I
L3 N45'30'0 1'W 2-21' LAJ
L4 S0645'1 7W 35.51'
LS N451.30,ol,w 68.87'
Ls N 1 E 38.24'
L7 N44'29'5TE 9.50,
Ls N45730'01'W 11.52'
L-9 N@25'43F 43.98'
L10 N@53'32E 22.69'
Lll N4513c),Ol,w 134.92'
Ln
LL12 S45-34'13'E 25.98'
L12
40
L!l
LE:ASE PARCF'L LE
1 B= S.F. OR C', 30- .30-1
0
N-45'30'01'W
FRONT STREET
EXHIBIT
SCALF-: 1'=80' SHE-t7
C)ATE: 2/16/96 LEASE PARCEL
DR. BY: ER i A- ASSOCIATIES
W.O.: 95-0212 CR/IL ENGINEERS I OF 1 SHEP--TS
F.B-: SIDE CALIFORNIA FILE NO.:
Recording Requested By
City of Temecula
When recorded mail to:
City of Temecula
Office of the City Clerk
43174 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
TemecuZa, Ca. 92589
GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMEENT AGENCY OF THIE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND DUAL DEVELOPN= INC.
R:\A\AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. PROPERTY LEASED 1
2. TERM 1
3. HOLDING OVER 2
4. RENT 2
5. CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
AND RETAIL PROJECT 3
6. WARRANTIES 5
7. SECURITY DEPOSIT 6
8. USE 7
9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 7
10. SIGNS 7
11. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 7
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE 8
13. FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE 10
14. PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES 12
15. UNDERGROUND TANKS 12
16. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INDEMNITY 12
17. TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS 13
18. UTILITIES 14
19. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS/MAINTENANCE 14
R:@XAGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE VN/96
20. ENTRY BY AGENCY 17
21. DISC ATION 18
22. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING 18
23. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES 18
24. INSOLVENCY OR BANKRUPTCY 18
25. DEFAULT OR BREACH 19
26. PARTIES BOUND AND BENEFITED 19
27. NO PARTNERSHIP OR JOINT VENTURE 19
28. TIME 20
29. CONDENWATION 20
30. TENANT'S DUTY TO REMOVE 20
31. ATTORNEYS' FEES 20
32. NOTICES AND PAYMENTS 21
33. SECTION HEADINGS 21
34. INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION 21
35. @RPRETATION 21
36. VENUE 22
37. NO ARBITRATION 22
38. PRIORITY OF DOCUMENTS 22
R:\A\.AGENDAS%DUALLEA-SE 2(29,96
GROUND LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELO
AGENCY OF THE CM OF TEMEECULA AND DUAL
DEVELOPMENT INC., CULA SHUTTLE
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, (hereinafter "Lease") is made and entered into
as of March 13, 1996, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CrrY
OF TEMECULA, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter "Agency"), as Lessor,
and DUAL DEVELOP INC., DBA TEMECULA SHUTTLE, a California
Corporation, (hereinafter "Tenant"), as Tenant. The parties agree that:
1. PROPERTY LEASED. Agency, in consideration of the rents and payments
herein agreed to be paid, and of the terms, covenants and conditions agreed to herein, hereby
leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from Agency, that certain real property
commonly described as a parcel of unimproved real property consisting of approximately
16,000 square feet, located at Sixth and Front Streets, in the.City of Temecula, California
and which is specifically depicted and legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
by this reference incorporated herein, (the "Premises").
2. TERM.
A. Initial Term. Unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in this
Lease, the term of this Lease shall be thirty (30) years commencing on July 1, 1996 and
ending June 30, 2026. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, whenever reference is made in
this Lease to the term of this Lease, such reference shall include any extension of the term of
thi s Lease.
B . Q12tion to Extend. Agency hereby grants to Tenant the right and option
to extend the term of this Lease for three (3) successive additional periods of five (5) years
each (the "Option Periods") on the same terms and conditions as contained in this Lease
including, without limitation, the rental adjustments set forth at Section 4 of this Lease,
subject to the conditions set forth in this subparagraph. Tenant's exercise of such right and
option shall be by written notice (the "Option Notice") given to Agency at least one (1) year
prior to the end of the term, including each extended term, of this Lease. Subject to the
provisions of the next sentence, upon the giving of the Option Notice, the term of this Lease
shall be extended for the Option Period, subject to earlier termination as elsewhere in this
Lease provided. Notwithstanding Tenant's prior exercise of its right and option to extend the
term of this @ (whether such exercise was, at the time, valid or invalid), Tenant shall
have no right and option to extend the term of this Lease, and any exercise of such right and
option shall be void, if at the date of the commencement of the extended term, Tenant is in
default under this Lease, whether or not cured pursuant to the terms of this Lease.
R:\AkAGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE -I- 2,W/96
3. HOLDING OVER. Should Tenant retain possession of the Premises after the
termination of this Lease or after the effective date of any termination of this Lease, such
holding over shall not constitute a renewal or extension of this Lease or give Tenant any
rights in or to the Premises.
4. RENT.
A. Except for the deferral period specified at Section 5(B) of this Lease,
Tenant shall pay to the Agency, without abatement, deduction or offset, Minimum Annual
Rent which consists of the Base Rent in the amount of Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred
Dollars ($16,800.00) per year and the Rent Adjustment(s) described below. The Minimum
Annual Rent shall be payable, in twelve (12) equal installments of One Thousand Four
Hundred Dollars ($1,400.00) each month, paid on or before the first of each month,
beginning on the first day following the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy by
the Agency for the Improvements described in Paragraph 5. If the rental commencement
date falls on a day of the month other than the first day of the month, the rent for the first
fractional month shall be pro rated. The monthly rent under Section 5(B) of this Lease of
Seven Hundred Dollars ($700.00) per month during the construction period and the monthly
rent under this Section 4(A) of $1400.00 per month for the first six (6) months following the
date of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy by the City for the Improvements
("Occupancy Date") shall accrue and payment of such "Accrued Rent" (consisting of $700.00
per month during construction period as set forth in Section 5(B) and $1400.00 for the first
six months of occupancy) shall be deferred. The Accrued Rent shall bear interest from the
commencement date of the lease until paid at the same interest rate as the Agency's Small
Business Loan to Tenant. The Accrued Rent shall be payable six (6) months following the
Occupancy Date in thirty-six (36) equal monthly installments in an amount calculated to
amortize fully the Accrued Rent, with interest.
B. On the first five year anniversary of this Lease July 1, 2001, and on
each subsequent five year anniversary during the initial term and extended term, if any, of
this Lease, the Base Rent described at subsection "A" above shall be increased by an amount
which is 8% greater than the Base Rent (including previous rent adjustments) applicable for
the immediately preceding five year period.
C. On the first twentieth year anniversary of this Lease July 1, 2016,
Agency shall cause the property to be reappraised at its then existing fair market value, and
the Minimum Annual Rental shall be adjusted to ten percent (10%) of the appraised fair
market value. Thereafter, on each subsequent five year anniversary of this Lease, including
extensions, if any, the Minimum Annual Rental shall be increased by an amount which is ten
percent (10%) greater than the Base Rent (including previous rental adjustments) applicable
for the immediately preceding five year period.
R:\A\AGENDAS\DUALLE.A.SE -2- @1%
D. Triple Net Lease. It is understood that this is a triple net lease and that
the Agency shall receive the rent set forth in subsections A, B and C above free and clear of
any and all impositions, taxes, liens, charges or expenses of any nature whatsoever in
connection with the ownership and operation of the Premises. In addition to the rent
reserved by subsections A, B and C, Tenant shall pay to the parties respectively entitled
thereto all impositions, possessory interest taxes, insurance premiums, operating charges,
maintenance charges, construction costs, and any other charges, costs and expenses which
arise or may be contemplated under provisions of this Lease during the term, including any
extensions, hereof; provided, however, that Agency shall pay all appraisal costs and fees
incurred in connection with the lease of the Premises and those costs of architectural site
planning, obtaining land use entitlements for the site plan, including a plot plan, and of the
Parking Lot, on behalf of the City of Temecula as agreed between the City and Tenant in
that certain Agreement for Acquisition of Real Property and Escrow Instructions for 41953
Main Street, Temecula and @ or Sale of Property Located at Sixth and Front Street,
Temecula (APN 922-034-029-1) dated March 16, 1995 ("Acquisition Agreement"). AR such
charges, costs and expenses shall constitute additional rent, -and upon the failure of Tenant to
pay any of such costs, charges or expenses, Agency shall have the same rights and remedies
as otherwise provided in this Lease for the failure of Tenant to pay rent. It is the intention
of the parties hereto that this Lease shall not be terminable for any reason by the Tenant, and
that Tenant shall in no event be entitled to any abatement of or reduction in rent payable
under this Lease, except as herein expressly provided. Any present or future law to the
contrary shall not alter this agreement of the parties.
5.CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACI]LrrY AND
RETAIIL PROJECT.
A. Tenant shall construct, at its sole cost and expense, a first class public
transportation and retail facility, and surrounding landscaping, on the Premises in accordance
with the designs, terms and specifications attached hereto at Exhibit B or subsequently
submitted by the Tenant and approved by the Agency (the "Improvements"). It is understood
and agreed that construction of the Improvements will proceed in two phases. Phase I of the
Improvements shall consist of the transportation facility and approximately 1800 square feet
of retail and office space, which shall include the office of Temecula Shuttle, a snack bar and
minor retail uses, including wine tour operations. Developer anticipates that Phase III of the
Improvements will include approximately 9,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and office
space and shall be consistent with adjoining land uses and shall comply with all applicable
zoning requirements. Phase H shall be constructed at the option of and within the time
period selected by the Tenant, but if it is developed, it shall be within the Premises.
B. During the construction periods set forth at Sections 5(C) and 5(D)
below, the monthly rental on the premises shall be Seven Hundred Dollars ($700.00) per
month which shall accrue and be payable on a deferred basis pursuant to Section 4(A) above.
R:\A\,\GENDA"U@.SE -3- VNI%
C. Preliminary plans for the Improvements shall be submitted to Agency
for review and approval on or before thirty (30) days from the date of this Lease.
Preliminary plans shall show the architectural elevations for the building, materials to be
used on the exterior, interior building layout, and a landscaping plan. The preliminary plans
shall be approved by the Planning Director at a Director's Hearing. Final construction plans
and specifications shall be consistent with the approved preliminary plans and shall be
submitted within thirty (30) days from the approval of the preliminary plans. The final
construction plans and specifications shall be approved by the Executive Director of the
Agency. Construction shall commence within one (1) month following approval of the final
plans and shall be completed within nine (9) months from the date of approval of the final
plans. If Tenant shall not have fulfilled the foregoing conditions by the date specified for
any reason, excluding force majeure or causes beyond the control of the Tenant other than
financing, then Agency may elect to terminate this Lease. Approvals shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
D. Tenant shall pay all costs of constructing the Improvements, including
but not limited to, fees and costs charged by architects, engineers, the general contractor,
subcontractors, and laborers and materialmen as well as the costs of offsite improvements,
and bonds required for the construction. Agency shall have no obligation to pay any costs or
fees in any way related with construction of the Improvements by Tenant under this Lease;
provided, however, the Agency shall pay any costs of grading the Premises to eliminate or
minimize flood plain problems and of bringing utility, water and sewer lines to the Premises.
E. Tenant shall post a Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of the
contract let for the Phase I Improvements plus ten percent (10%), prior to the issuance of a
building permit for the Phase I Improvements and a subsequent Labor and Materials Bond in
the amount of the contract let for the Phase I[[ Improvements plus ten percent (10%) prior to
the issuance of a building permit for the Phase 11 Improvements. The form and content of
the bond and the surety shall be approved by the Executive Director of the Agency.
F. Tenant shall keep the Premises and Improvements free from all liens
and encumbrances by reason of the use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant, unless
approved in writing by the Agency. If any liens or encumbrances are filed thereon, Tenant
shall remove the same at its own cost and expense and shall pay any judgment and penalties
which may be entered thereon. Should Tenant fail, neglect or refuse to do so, Agency shall
have the right to pay any amount required to release any lien or encumbrance or to defend
any action brought thereon, and to pay any judgment or penalty, and Tenant shall be liable to
Agency for all costs, damages, and attorneys' fees, and any amounts expended in defending
any proceedings, or in the payment of any lien, encumbrance, judgment or penalty. Agency
may post and maintain upon the premises notices of nonresponsibility as provided by law.
Upon demand by Agency, Tenant shall post the bond contemplated by Civil Code Section
3143.
R:\A\AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE -4- 2t29/96
G. Ownership of Improvements During Lease Term. Title to all
Improvements to be constructed on the Premises by Tenant shall be owned and may be
depreciated for income tax purposes by Tenant until expiration of the term, including
extensions, if any, or sooner termination of this @; provided, however, Agency disclaims
any warranty of title or any representation or warranty that depreciation may be available to
Tenant.H. Ownership of lml2rgve-ments at Termination. All Improvements on the
Premises at theexpiration of the term, including extensions, if any, or sooner termination of
this Lease shall, without compensation to Tenant, automatically and without any act of
Tenant or any third party become Agency's property. Tenant shall surrender the
Improvements to Agency at the expiration of the term, including extensions, if any, or
sooner termination of this Lease, in good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear
excepted, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, other than those, if any, permitted
under this Lease, or otherwise created or consented to by Agency. Tenant agrees to execute,
acknowledge, and deliver to Agency any instrument requested by Agency as reasonably
necessary in Agency's opinion to perfect Agency's right, title, and interest to the
Improvements and the Premises.
I.Fixtures. Tenant agrees that the following items are real property for
purposes of this Lease: All permanent fixtures now or hereafter installed by Tenant on or in
the Premises, or the Improvements for the generation and distribution of air, water, heat,
electricity, light, fuel or refrigeration, or for ventilating or air-conditioning purposes, or for
sanitary or drainage purposes, or for the exclusion of vermin, or insects, or for the removal
of dust, refuse, or garbage, and including all awnings, window shades, drapery rods and
brackets, screens, floor coverings, incinerators, carpeting and permanent fixtures used in the
operation of the Improvements together with all additions to, substitutions for, changes in or
replacements of, the whole or any or all of said items of property.
J. Real Estate Covenant. Agency and Tenant covenant and agree that all
Improvements shall at all times be, and remain, real property notwithstanding Tenant's
interim ownership of the Improvements.
6.WARRANTI]ES.
A. Tenant acknowledges that it is sophisticated and knowledgeable with
regard to evaluating and leasing real property in the area and that prior to the commencement
of this Lease Tenant will have had sufficient opportunity to enter the Premises to perform
such tests and investigations as Tenant deems necessary to satisfy itself as to the condition of
the Premises for the uses set forth in this Lease. Tenant shall not be responsible for
Hazardous Materials (as defined in Paragraph 16 of this Lease) which may be present on the
Premises as of the date of this @.
R:%A\AGENDAS\I)UALLEA.SE -5- VNI96
TENANT IS ACQ
G A LEASEHOLD INTEREST IN
THE P SES "AS IS" Y=OUT ANY
REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND
WHATSOEVER AS TO ITS CONDITION, PROVIDED
HOWEVER THAT TENANT SHALL NOT BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (AS
DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH 16 OF THIS LEASE) ON THE
PREMISES WHICH MAY BE PRESENT ON THE PREMISES
AS OF THE DATE OF TIES LEASE.
B.Agency represents and warrants that, as of the effective date of this
Lease: 1) it is the owner in fee simple of the Premises; 2) the use of the Premises as set
forth in Paragraph 8 of this Lease does not violate any known restrictions applicable to the
Premises; and 3) this Lease has been approved as required by law.
7.SECURITY DEPOSIT.
A. Tenant shall deposit with Agency the sum of One Thousand Four
Hundred Dollars ($1,400.00) as security for the full performance and observance of each and
every provision of this Lease, provided that the said amount shall be increased each time the
rent is adjusted by a percentage equal to the percentage increase of the Rent Adjustment as
set forth in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. The initial deposit shall be paid directly to
Agency concurrently with the execution of this Lease, which payment shall constitute a
condition precedent to the obligations of Agency hereunder, and the increase shall be paid
with the monthly rent payment next following a Rent Adjustment.
B. In addition to any other remedies the Agency may have pursuant to this
if Tenant defaults in any particular, Agency may use, apply, or retain the whole or
any part of the deposit (1) to the extent of any sum due to Agency, or (2) to make any
required payment on Tenant's behalf, or (3) to compensate Agency for any expense or
damage caused by Tenant's default. Tenant shall pay to Agency a sum equivalent to the
amount by which the deposit was so depleted within thirty (30) days after Tenant's receipt of
written notice from Agency of said depletion.
C. Agency is not a trustee of the deposit and may commingle it, use it in
ordinary business, transfer or assign it, or use it in any combination of those ways. No
interest shall accrue on the deposit. Upon the expiration or termination of this Lease,
Agency shall return the deposit to Tenant, provided that Tenant is not then in default.
R:'A\AG@AS\DU@.SE -6-
8.
A. The Premises and the Improvements shall be used only for such uses as
are authorized or permitted under the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Zone as identified in the
Old Town Specific Plan as it now exists or may hereafter be amended by the City Council of
the City of Temecula.
B. Tenant shall construct, maintain and provide four (4) bus parking
spaces on the Premises and Tenant shall provide automobile parldng spaces as required by
the City's applicable zoning requirements. With respect to the automobile parking spaces,
Tenant may elect to construct, maintain and provide for such spaces on the Premises or
Tenant may elect to pay such fees as are required for providing the equivalent of such spaces
on a City or Agency owned parking lot pursuant to a parldng district or parldng fee
ordinance, in accordance with applicable zoning requirements.
9. COMTLLANCE WITH LAWS. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and
expense, comply promptly with all applicable statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations,
orders, restrictions of record, and requirements in effect during the term of this Lease, or
any part, or extended term of this Lease, regulating the Premises, construction of the
Improvements, the use by Tenant of the Premises, and/or the operation by Tenant of its
business therein, including, without limitation, any and all requirements of City respecting
facility hours of operation, sound amplification, hghting, noise, security or other matters.
10. SIGNS. Tenant shall not allow the construction or placement of any sign,
signboard or other form of outdoor advertising anywhere on the Premises without the prior
written consent of the Executive Director of the Agency, which consent shall not be
unreasonable withheld. In the event Tenant violates this provision, Tenant hereby authorizes
Agency to enter the Premises, without notice, and to remove and dispose of any such sign,
signboard or other advertising and to charge the cost and expense of any such removal and
disposal to Tenant, who shall pay the same on demand.
11. IND CATION AND HOLD HARMILESS. Tenant shall indemnify,
defend (with legal counsel approved by Agency, such approval by Agency shall not be
unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless Agency, City of Temecula and their respective
elected and appointed officers, employees, servants and agents from and against all claims,
actions, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, attomey's fees and other expense of any nature for
loss or damage to property, or injury to or death of persons, arising in any manner
whatsoever, directly or indirectly, by reason of this Lease or the use or occupancy of the
Premises by Tenant (collectively "Claim") (whether the Claim be made during the
term or thereafter), except such loss, damage, injury or death caused by the sole negligence
of Agency or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents. The liability of Tenant
hereunder shall not be limited by the insurance provisions of Paragraph 12 of this Lease.
R:@\AGENDASIDU@.SE -7-
The indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless provisions of this Section shall survive
the expiration of termination of this @ and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's
previous ownership or possession of the Premises.
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the @, at its own cost and expense, insurance against claims for injuries to
persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with from the use,
occupancy, disuse or condition of the Premises or improvements thereon.
A.Minimum Scolg of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and/or Employer's Liability Insurance.
B.Minimum Limits of Insurance. Tenant shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit
is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury or disease.
C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director of the
Agency, which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld. At the option of the Agency,
either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Tenant shall
provide security reasonably satisfactory to the Agency guaranteeing payment of losses and
related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
D. Other Insurance Provi . The general liability policy is to contain,
or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
R:%A\AGEND@U@.SE -9- 2m/%
(1)The Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are
to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Tenant; products and
completed operations of the Tenant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Tenant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Agency, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)For any claims related to this project, the Tenant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Agency, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or
self-insured maintained by the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Tenant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect
coverage provided to the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(4)The Tenant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed
to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party or
reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days'
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the Agency.
E. Accel2tabiliiy of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with
a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the
Agency.
F. Verification of Coverazg. Tenant shall furnish the Agency with
certificates of insurance executed by an authorized agent of the insurance company,
authorized to bind the insurance company, or original endorsements, or complete, certified
copies of all required insurance policies effecting coverage required by this Section. The
endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the Agency. AR endorsements
are to be received and approved by the Agency before work commences.
R:%A\AGEND@@.SE -9- VNI%
G. Subcontractors. Tenant shall include all subcontractors as insureds
under its policy or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
H. Increases in Coverage. The amount of insurance coverage described in
Subsection (B) shall be increased every five (5) years on the Anniversary Date in such an
amount as the Agency may reasonably determine based upon inflation, increased liability
awards, recommendations of professional insurance advisors and other factors customarily
used to determine appropriate levels of coverage of the insurance required by this Lease.
13. FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE. Tenant, at Tenant's
sole cost and expense, shall provide and maintain insurance covering the Improvements,
including, without limitation, all buildings, structures, and improvements now situate or
which hereafter may be erected or placed on the Premises, against loss or damage by fire,
vandalism, malicious mischief, windstorm, hail, smoke, explosion, riot, civil commotion,
vehicles, aircraft, flood or earthquake, including, without limitation, endorsements or
increased cost of construction due to changes in laws, agreed amount or demolition. AR
such insurance shall be in a sum not less than 90 percent of the replacement cost (the
"Replacement Cost") exclusive of foundations and below ground improvements and shall
contain "Replacement Cost Endorsement." Such insurance shall be in forms and with
companies satisfactory to Agency in its reasonable discretion. Tenant shall not carry any
insurance the effect of which would be to reduce the protection of or payment to Tenant or
Agency under any insurance that this Lease obligates Tenant to carry. If any dispute
concerning compliance with the requirements of this Section cannot be resolved by
agreement, Agency may, not more often than once every 12 months, request that the
Replacement Cost be determined by a reputable and qualified insurance consultant selected
and paid by the Agency and the resulting determination shall be conclusive between the
parties for the purpose of this Section.
A. Use of Proceeds. Agency shall, at Tenant's cost and expense,
cooperate fully with Tenant to obtain the largest possible recovery under all policies of fire
and extended coverage insurance required by this Section. Subject to the terms of any
Leasehold Mortgage that may constitute a lien on the Premises, all such policies shall
provide that the proceeds shall be paid as set forth in this Section. If the proceeds do not
exceed the amount defined in this Lease as the measure of minor restoration, all the proceeds
shall be adjusted by and paid to Tenant and shall be applied by Tenant for the restoration of
any Improvements damaged or destroyed by the casualty giving rise to the insurance claim.
If the proceeds exceed that measure, all the proceeds shall be adjusted jointly by Agency and
Tenant, deposited with a mutually acceptable trustee (the "Trustee") and disbursed subject to
all the provisions of this
R:%A\AGENDAS\DUALL.EA.SE -10- 2r291%
(1)Tenant shall pay Trustee, on request from time to time, the
amount the estimated cost of completing the restoration, as
reasonably determined by Trustee, exceeds the amount of the
proceeds deposited with Trustee (all funds deposited with, or
received by Trustee are referred to as the "Restoration Fund").
AU funds remaining in the Restoration Fund on completion of
the restoration shall be paid to Tenant after paying to the
@hold Mortgagee any sums necessary to cure any default
thereunder that can be cured by the payment of money. If an
event of default exists at the time the casualty occurs or at any
time thereafter, then, at the sole and arbitrary option of the
Agency, all or part of the Restoration Fund may be applied by
Trustee (i) to the restoration and no such refund shall be due
Tenant, or (ii) to cure any event of default.
(2)Disbursements shall be made from time to time as reasonably
requested by Tenant in an amount not exceeding 90 percent of
the cost of the work completed since the last disbursement, on
receipt of satisfactory evidence of the stage of completion and of
performance of the work in a good and workmanlike manner in
accordance with the contracts, plans, and specifications.
(3)At the time of any disbursement, no event of default shall exist
hereunder, and no mechanics' or materialmen's liens or stop
notices shall have been filed and remain undischarged.
(4)Trustee may retain 10 percent of the Restoration Fund until the
restoration is fully completed, the mechanics' lien claim period
has expired, and there are no undischarged liens nor stop
notices.
(5)The parties agree that any @hold Mortgagee shall be an
acceptable trustee.
(6)Trustee may impose such other reasonable conditions as are then
customarily imposed by construction lenders in the area where
the Premises are located.
(7)Nothing herein shall discharge, postpone, or delay the
performance of any other covenant, promise, or agreement of
Tenant undertaken under this Lease. The right of Agency
(whether or not exerci@) to apply Restoration Funds to
R:\A\AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE -11- 2t29196
complete the restoration shall not be deemed to cure any default
of Tenant or satisfy any damages of Agency hereunder.
B. Agency shall not be obligated to keep the Premises insured against fire
or any other insurable risk. Tenant hereby and forever waives all right to claim or recover
damages from Agency in any amount as the result of any damage to the Premises by fire,
earthquake, flooding, storm or any other casualty, except to the extent any such casualty is
caused the Agency.
14. PESTIC]IDES AND HERBIC]IDES. Tenant shall use pesticides and
herbicides everywhere on the Premises in strict accordance with all applicable statutes,
ordinances, rules and regulations. Tenant shall dispose of all pesticides and herbicides, and
any containers, clothing, equipment and other materials contaminated therefrom, in such a
manner as prescribed by law. Tenant shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved
by Agency (such approval by Agency shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless
Agency and its officers, employees, servants and agents from and against all claims, actions,
liabilities, losses, damages, costs, reasonable attomey's fees and other expenses of any nature
resulting from Tenant's use of pesticides and herbicides anywhere on the Premises. The
indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless provisions of this Section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Lease and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's
previous ownership or possession of the Premises.
15. UNDERGROUND TANKS. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set
forth in this @, Tenant shall not install underground or above-ground fuel and/or
Hazardous Materials (defined in Section 18) storage tanks anywhere on the Premises.
16.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INDEMN=.
A. Tenant shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by Agency
(such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless Agency and its
officers, employees, servants and agents from and against any and all claims, actions,
liabilities, losses, damages, costs, reasonable attomey's fees and other expenses of any nature
(a) including, without limitation, all foreseeable and all unforeseeable consequential damages,
directly or indirectly arising out of the presence, use, generation, storage, release or disposal
of Hazardous Materials on the Premises, except for those present on the Premises as of the
date of this Lease, or arising out of the presence or use of any underground tanks which may
be installed and located on the Premises after the date of this Lease, and (b) including,
without limitation, the cost of any required or necessary repair, cleanup, or detoxification,
and the preparation of any response, remedial, closure or other required plans, to the full
extent that such action is attributable, directly or indirectly, to the presence, use, generation,
storage, release, or disposal of Hazardous Materials on the Premises by Tenant or Tenant's
invitees after the date of this @e.
R:\A\AGENDA"U@.SE -12- 2129196
B. As used in this Section, Hazardous Materials means any substance,
product, waste or other material of any nature whatsoever which is or becomes listed,
regulated or addressed pursuant to (1) the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, Z =. ("CERCLA"); the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C., Section 1801, gi =.; the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C., Section 6901, ?A =.; the Toxic Substances
Control Act, 15 U.S.C., Section 2601, et =.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section
125 1, @t =.; the California Ha7ardous Waste Control Act, Health and Safety Code Section
25100, et =.; the California Ha7-nrdous Substance Account Act, Health and Safety Code
Section 25330, gt xQ.; the California Safe Drinldng Water and Toxic Enforcement Act,
Health and Safety Code Section 25249.5 et =.; California Health and Safety Code Section
25280, gi =.; (Underground Storage of Hq7nrdous Substances); the California Hn7nrdous
Waste Management Act, Health and Safety Code Section 25170. 1, et =.; California Health
and Safety Code Section 25501, et =. (Hazardous Materials Response Plans and Inventory);
or the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Water Code Section 13000, et 5M., all as
amended, (2) any other federal or state law or any local law regulating, relating to, or
imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any hq7.qrdous, toxic or dangerous
waste, substance or material, as now is, or at any time hereafter may be, in effect, and (3)
any rule or regulation adopted or promulgated under or pursuant to any of said laws.
C. If Tenant receives any notice, whether oral or written, of any inquiry,
test, investigation, enforcement proceeding, environmental audit or the like regarding any
Hn7,qrdous Material on the Premises, Tenant shall immediately notify Agency in writing of
such notice.
D. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Lease and shall relate back to all periods of Tenant's previous ownership
or possession of the Premises. The provisions of this section are intended to operate as an
agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section 9607(e), and
California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to insure, protect, hold harmless and
indemnify Agency from any liability pursuant to such laws.
17.TAXES, ASSESSMEENTS AND LIENS.
A. Tenant shall pay, when due, all taxes and assessments which may be
levied against Tenant's possessory interest in the Premises and upon any improvements, trade
fixtures and personal property which is currently located on the Premises and/or which
Tenant causes to be constructed, placed or maintained upon the Premises. Tenant shall
provide to Agency within five (5) days after the date when any tax or assessment would
become delinquent, receipts or other appropriate evidence establishing this payment. The
parties contemplate that the Agency will create a separate parcel for the Premises. In the
event this is not accomplished or the assessor's office does not create a separate tax parcel
R:\A\AG@AS\DU@.SE -13- V"/%
for the Premises and separately assess the Premises and Improvements, property taxes shall
be allocated in the ratio that the land area of the Premises bears to the total tax parcel, and
the Improvements located on the Premises bears to the total improvements assessed.
B. Tenant shall keep the Premises and Improvements free from all liens
and encumbrances by reason of the use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant. If any liens
or encumbrances are filed thereon, Tenant shall remove the same at its own cost and expense
and shall pay any judgment and penalties which may be entered thereon. Should Tenant fail,
neglect or refuse to do so, Agency shall have the right, but not the obligation, to pay any
amount required to release any lien or encumbrance or to defend any action brought thereon,
and to pay any judgment or penalty, and Tenant shall be liable to Agency for all costs,
damages, and attorneys' fees, and any amounts expended in defending any proceedings, or in
the payment of any lien, encumbrance, judgment or penalty. Agency may post and maintain
upon the premises notices of nonresponsibility as provided by law. Upon demand by
Agency, Tenant shall post the bond contemplated by Civil Code Section 3143.
18. Ui,I]LrfIES. Tenant shall pay all charges and assessments for, or in
connection with, electricity, gas, water, telephone and all other utilities which may be
furnished to, or used on, the Premises, except as provided in Section 5(D) above.
19. TENANT D4PROVEMENTSIMA ANCE.
A.Throughout the term of this @ Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost
and expense, repairand maintain the Premises and all Improvements thereon in good order
and condition and inaccordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
and subject to the provisions of this Lease. Agency shall not be obligated to repair or
maintain the Premises or Improvements in any manner at any time during the term of this
Lease; provided, however, Agency may elect to perform any obligation of Tenant pursuant
to this Section on Tenant's failure or refusal to do so and at Tenant's reasonable cost and
expense. Said election by Agency shall not constitute a waiver of any right or remedy for
Tenant's default. Tenant shall reimburse Agency for the reasonable cost and expense it
incurred in the performance of Tenant's obligation within thirty (30) days of Agency's
request for payment.
B. The parties shall have the following responsibilities with regard to
maintenance of the Premises.
(1)Duly to Maintain First-Class Condition. Throughout the term,
Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, and at no cost
and expense to Agency, maintain the Premises in first-class
condition and repair and in accordance with (a) all applicable
laws, permits, licenses and other govemmenw authorizations,
R:@\AGEND@ALL.F.A.SE -14- 2129196
rules, ordinances, orders, decrees and regulations now or
hereafter enacted, issued, or promulgated by federal, state,
county, municipal, and other governmental agencies, bodies,
and courts having or claiming jurisdiction and all their
respective departments, bureaus, and officials ("Uws"); (b)
rules, orders, regulations, and requirements now or hereafter
enacted, issued, or promulgated by the insurance underwriting
board or insurance inspection bureau having or claiming
jurisdiction and all insurance companies insuring all or any part
of the Premises (the "Insurance Requirements").
Tenant shall promptly and diligently repair, restore, alter, add
to, remove, and replace, as required, the Premises and all
Improvements thereon to maintain or comply as above, or to
remedy all damage to or destruction of all or any part of the
Improvements. Any repair, restoration, alteration, addition,
removal, maintenance, replacement, and other act of compliance
under this Section (hereafter collectively referred to as
"Restoration") shall be completed by Tenant whether or not
funds are available from insurance proceeds, condemnation
proceeds or Subtenant contributions. The Restoration shall be
repaired or restored at least to the building standard and quality
of the Improvements in existence prior to the date of such
damage or destruction.
If during the last five years of the term of this Lease, a casualty
occurs for which insurance is not required under this Lease and
which causes damages in excess of one-half of the then fair
market value of the Improvements, then Tenant may elect to
terminate this Lease, notwithstanding any other term hereof.
Nothing in this provision defining the duty of maintenance shall
be construed as limiting any right given elsewhere in this Lease
to alter, modify, demolish, remove, or replace any
Improvement. No deprivation, impairment, or limitation of use
resulting from any event or work contemplated by this Section
shall entitle Tenant to any abatement, deduction, diminution,
offset, or reduction in rent nor to any termination or extension
of the term, except as provided herein.
(2)First-Class Condition De i@n . "First-class condition and
repair," means Restoration that is necessary to keep the
R:\A\AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE15-
Premises and Improvements in efficient and attractive condition,
at least substantially equal in quality to the condition of the
Improvements constructed by Tenant and to that maintained by
managers of similar buildings and facilities in the area. The
Agency and Tenant do not intend by the immediately preceding
sentence that a property item is not first-class condition and
repair merely because of ordinary and reasonable wear and tear
that does not materially reduce the attractiveness or utility of the
item.
(3)Restoration During Lease Term. Tenant understands and agrees
that, in order to (i) operate the Building in a first-class manner,
(ii) maintain the Premises and Improvements in a first-class
condition and repair, and (iii) to provide up-to-date facilities of
first-class order, consideration of and the performance of
periodic major restoration of the Improvements and all
operations therein is necessary. Therefore, Tenant shall submit
to Agency, prior to the expiration of the fifth (5th) year of the
Lease and each five (5) years thereafter during the term of this
Lease, a plan for major restoration of the Improvements. If any
such restoration is not then required in Tenant's reasonable
business judgment, Tenant shall not submit such a plan but shall
state to Agency the reasons why such work is not required,
which statement shall be in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Agency. The plan (which shall be subject to the
further provisions of this Section) shall provide for
commencement of work within six months after the required
submittal date. Agency shall not unreasonably withhold its
consent to any submitted plan, and Tenant agrees to prepare and
submit a new plan within 30 days of rejection of a plan by
Agency. After approval of a plan by Agency, Tenant shall
promptly secure all necessary permits, licenses and other
approvals for the work and shall commence construction and
thereafter shall diligently prosecute the same to completion as
provided in the plan and in accordance with this Lease.
(4)Minor Construction. Agency's approval is not required for
Tenant's minor restoration. "Minor" means an expenditure for
restoration that does not exceed five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) ("Minor Amount"). Every five (5) years during the
term of the Lease, the Minor Amount shall be increased (or
decreased) proportionately to any increase (or decrease) in the
R:\A\.AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE -16- @196
AR Urban Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles/
Anaheim/Long Beach areas ("CPI'), as published by the United
States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The
increase (or decrease) in the Minor Amount shall be determined
by multiplying Minor Amount by a fraction, the numerator of
which is the Adjustment Index (as hereinafter defined) and the
denominator of which is the Base Index (as hereinafter defined).
The term 'Base Index" as used in this Section is the CPI figure
for the month prior to the month that rent commences hereunder
as provided in Section 4(A) above. The term "Adjustment
Index" as used in this Lease shall be the CPI figure closest to
the date on which restoration is scheduled to commence, as this
figure is recorded in the United States Department of Labor's
most comprehensive official index then in use and most nearly
similar and corresponding to the Base Index. If the Adjustment
Index is calculated from a base different from the base used
herein for the Base Index, the Base Index used for calculating
the new Minor Amount shall first be converted to correspond to
the Adjustment Index under a formula supplied by the
Department of Labor. If the United States Department of Labor
shall discontinue publication of the Base Index, and a consumer
price index of the same type and character is determined and
published by another department of the United States
government, then the index most nearly similar to the Base
Index shall be used for the computation contemplated herein. In
the absence of any such official consumer price index published
by a United States governmental agency, then the most nearly
similar index published by a responsible private organization
shall be used. "Major" means all other restoration. Restoration
cost shall include the actual cost to Tenant for any demolition
and any removal of existing Improvements or parts of
Improvements as well as for preparation, construction, and
completion of all new Improvements or parts of Improvements.
20. ENTRY BY AGENCY. Agency may enter upon the Premises and
improvements thereon at all reasonable times upon one business day's prior notice to Tenant
to examine the condition thereof, including its environmental condition, and for the purpose
of undertaking such maintenance and repairs as Agency elects to make pursuant to Section 19
above.
R:IAIAGENDAS\DU@.SE -17- VNI%
21. DISCR@ATION. Tenant shall not discriminate, in the use of the
Premises, against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, national
origin, religion, age or sex or for any other reason prohibited by law.
22. ASSIG AND SUBLETTING. Tenant shall not assign this Lease, or
any interest therein, and shall not sublet the Premises, or any part thereof, or suffer any
other person to occupy or use the Premises, or any improvement thereon, in whole or in
part, without the prior written consent of the Agency, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld. Agency shall have the right to consider the qualifications of a proposed assignee
or sublessee based upon its desire to locate and operate a first-class public transportation
center and/or retail facility. Agency hereby consents to Tenant's leasing of retail space
without further Agency approvals so long as any such lease is in accordance with restrictions
on use set forth in this Lease and applicable zoning ordinances. Tenant shall pay Agency the
reasonable costs incurred by the Agency to enable it to investigate the qualifications of a
proposed assignee and reasonable attorney fees for any legal review of the documents
involved. A consent to one assignment, subletting, occupation or use by another person shall
not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment, subletting, occupation or use
by another person. Any assignment, subletting occupation or use without such consent shall
be void, and shall, at the option of Agency, terminate this Lease.
23. ESTOPPEL CERTMCATES. At any time and from time to time, within
fifteen (15) days after written notice of request by either party, the other party shall execute,
acknowledge, and deliver to the requesting party, or to such other recipient as the notice
shall direct, a statement certifying that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect
or, if there have been written modifications, that it is in full force and effect as modified in
the manner specified in the statement. The statement shall also state the dates to which the
rent and any other charges have been paid in advance. The statement shall be such that it
can be relied on by any auditor, creditor, commercial banker, investment banker or the like
of either party and by any prospective purchaser or proposed assignee of the Premises.
24. INSOLVENCY OR BANKRUPTCY. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Lease, including without limitation Section 7 hereof, if Tenant shall be adjudged
bankrupt or insolvent this Lease shall thereupon immediately terminate and the same shall not
be assignable by any process of law, nor shall this Lease be treated as an asset of the Tenant
under such adjudication, nor shall it pass under the control of any trustee or assignee by
virtue of any process in bankruptcy or insolvency, or by execution or assignment for the
benefit of creditors. If any such event occurs, this Lease shall immediately become null and
void and of no effect, and Agency may immediately retake possession of the Premises.
R:\AIAGENDAS\DUALl-EA.SE -18- VW/%
25.DEFAULT OR BREACH.
A. Except as otherwise provided in this @, at any time one party is in
default or breach of any provision of this Lease, the other party shall give written notice to
remedy such default or breach. If the default or breach is remedied within ten (10) days
following such notice, then this Lease shall continue in full force and effect. If, 1) such
default or breach is not remedied within said 10 days, or 2) the nature of the default or
breach is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within 10 days and the defaulting party fails
to commence to cure within the 10 day period and thereafter diligently prosecute the cure to
completion, then the non defaulting party may, at its option, terminate this Lease and take
possession of the Premises without further notice and shall also have be entitled to such
damages or other remedies at law or in equity available to either party because of such
default or breach. Termination of this Lease pursuant to this section, shall not be considered
a waiver of damages or other remedies at law or in equity available to either party because
of such default or breach.
B. Each term and condition of this Lease shall also be deemed to be a
covenant. A default under that certain Promissory Note dated
1996 by Dual Development in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00)
which has not been fully cured within the time required therein, shall constitute a default
under this Lease.
C. A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of
any provision of this Lease shall not constitute or be deemed to be a waiver of any
subsequent or other default or breach. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in
writing by the party maldng the waiver; waivers on behalf of Agency shall be given by
resolution of the Agency. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or
performed by either party shall give the other any contractual right by custom, estoppel, or
otherwise. The subsequent acceptance of rent pursuant to this Lease shall not constitute a
waiver of any preceding default by Tenant other than default in the payment of the particular
rental payment so accepted, regardless of Agency's knowledge of the preceding breach at the
time of accepting the rent; nor shall acceptance of rent or any other payment after expiration
or termination constitute a reinstatement, extension, or renewal of the Lease or revocation of
any notice or other act by Agency.
26. PARTIES BOUND AND BENEFITED. Each term, covenant and condition
herein contained shall apply to, and be binding on, all successors and assigns of the parties
hereto.
27. NO PARTNERSHIP OR JOINT VENTURE. Nothing in this Lease shall be
construed to render the Agency in any way or for any purpose a partner, joint venturer, or
R:\A\AGENDAS\DU@.SE -19- @1%
associate in any relationship with Tenant other than that of landlord and tenant, nor shall this
Lease be construed to authorize either to act as agent for the other.
28. . Time and specific performance are each of the essence of this
29. COND@ATION. If the whole of the Premises shall be taken by a public
entity under the power of eminent domain, this @ shall terminate on the day of
possession by the public entity. If only a part of the Premises shall be taken under eminent
domain, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease upon written notice given within
thirty (30) days after the day of possession by the public entity. If this Lease remains in
effect, all of its provisions shall continue in full force and effect, except that the Annual Rent
shall be adjusted proportionately from the date of the L-ddng for the balance of the Lease
term. If a Lildng under the power of eminent domain occurs, compensation attributable to
the leasehold interest of Tenant shall belong to Tenant and compensation attributable to the
reversionary interest of Agency shall belong to Agency.
30. TENANT'S DUTY TO REMOVE. Upon the expiration or termination of the
Lease, the Tenant may remove all personal property, equipment and fixtures from the
Premises, as such terms are defined or modified in Section 5(I), but shall surrender to the
Agency the Premises with the Improvements in the condition required by the terms of this
Lease. If any of Tenant's personal property, equipment or fixtures remain on the Premises
after the expiration or termination of this Lease, Agency may, at its option, use, dispose of,
and/or sell any of said property, equipment and fixtures without compensating Tenant for
same and without the Agency having any liability whatsoever therefore.
31. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought
for the enforcement of, or the declaration of, any right or obligation pursuant to, this Lease
or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Lease, or for an unlawful
detainer action, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses,
including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree
rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.
R:\A\AGE"A=U@-SE -20- VNI%
32. NOTICES AND PA S. All notices required under this
including change of address, shall be in writing, and all notices and payments shall be
addressed as follows:
Aizency:Executive Director
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Copy to:Peter M. Thorson
Burke, Williams & Sorensen
611 West Sixth Street, Suite 2500
Los Angeles, California 90017
Tenant:Dual Development Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle
41920 6th Street, Suite H
Temecula, California 92590
Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different
address which shall be substituted for the one specified above. Notice shall be deemed given
upon receipt by personal delivery or upon deposit in the United States mail, certified or
registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid.
33. SECTION HEADINGS. Section headings in this Lease are for convenience
only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants and
conditions of this Lease.
34. @GRATION AND MODIFTCATION. This Lease constitutes the entire
agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements and
understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Lease may not be modified
or amended except in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto and such modification or
amendment must be approved by a resolution of the Agency. Both parties agree that no
estoppel argument can be raised during legal proceedings in order to avoid the provisions of
this section.
35. EVMRPRETATION. Should interpretation of this Lease, or any portion
thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that the Lease was prepared by the parties jointly and
equally, and the Lease shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the
party prepared it or caused it to be prepared.
R:\A\AGEND@U@.SE
-21-
36. VENUE. The Lease is made, entered into, and executed in Riverside County,
California, and any action filed in any court from the interpretation, enforcement or other
action arising from any term, covenant or condition herein shall be filed in the applicable
court in Riverside County, California.
37. NO ARB@TION. The parties do not intend to, nor do they agree to
submit to arbitration any dispute of whatsoever ldnd or nature, including but not limited to
unlawful detainer actions, which arise out of, or in any way relate to, this Lease.
38. PRIORITY OF DOCUMENTS. The parties hereto contemplate entering into
additional agreements respecting the loan of funds by Agency to Tenant to construct, in
whole or in part, the Improvements, specified at Section 5, on the Premises. In the event of
any conflict respecting the terms of this Lease and such other agreements, the terms of this
Lease shall prevail.
R:%A\AGENDAS\DUALLEA.SE -22- 2m/w
IN S WHEREOF, the parties have caused this @ Agreement to
be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE
CITY OF CULA
B
Chairperson
A=T:
June@.@reek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Oeter M. Thorson, City Attorney
DUAL DEVEL EN. INC.
By I i JY)
K@thleen Dool, President
By
Edward Dool, Vice President
R:\A@GENDAMU@.SE -23-
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, Attorney for Dual
Development Inc., dba Temecula Shuttle
R:\A%AGENDAS\DU@.SE -24- V"t%
EXHIBIT"A'
That portion of Lot I of Tr= Map 23925, as shown by Map on file in Book 209 of
Maps at pages 21 through 23, Records of Riverside County, Califomia. described as
follows:
B at the most westerly comer of @d Lot 1;
Thence North 44' 25' 45' FAst. along the n@wcstctly Wm of @d Lot, a dis=ce
of 147.87 feet;
lbencr- South 45' 34' 1 S' @ a distance of 26.98 f6a;
Thence South 44' 25'45' W@ a distan= of 18.33 f@
Thence South 45' 30' 01 a distance of 2.21 feet;
Thence South 05' 45' 17' We@ a distance of 35.51 f@
Thence South 45' 3 O' 0 I" East, a distance of 68.87 feet;
T'nence South 14' 29'59' West, a distance of 36.24 feet;
7=nce South 4.4' 29'59" West, a @ce of 9.50 f@;
Thence South 45' 30' 01' East, a distance of 11.62 fee to a point in the
northwesterly right-of-way line of 6th St=t as shown on said map;
Thence South 44' 25'43" West along said right-of-way )Inc, a distance of 43.98
Thence South 85@ 53'32' West along said right-of-way line, a di@cr, of 22.69
f=t to a point in the no ly right-of-way line of Front St=t as shown oil said map;
Thence North 45' 30' 0 I' West along said right-of-way line, a distance of 134-92
feet to the Point of Be@g.
9@l @.dm
Containing 0.37 acres, mcrc or less.
pREpARED LTNDER MY ST.JPERVISION:
F . Lo @/) c, /@ @
F,. Webb, L.S. 5529
Prepared by: i&g
Checked by: 114 E4@
SCAI P: 1-=@
@@ERCEDESp6nSTREET
W4,
730'43'W b
pn
30,
UNE K~ M7@
Ll N4425'45'E 147.87
L2 N@25'49'E 18.33,
L3 N45,30,01,w 2-21' IAJ
L4 SOF45'1 7W 35.51,
LS M45'30'01
w 68.87'
LB N14-29.5if E 36.24'
L7 N44'29'5grE 9.50,
LB N45130101,w 11.62'
L9 N@25'43E
43.96,
L10 NBF53'32E 22.69'
Lll N45'30'01'w 134.92'
Ln
L121 S45-34-15-E 26.98'
L12
L5 40
_j
LE:ASF- PARCEL LE
1 S= !LF. OR CL37 AC, 'm
x .30-
pn N45'30'01'W tn
L
FRONT STREET
EXHIBIT " I"
SCALE: I'=80' SHER--T
DATE: 2/1 6/96 LEASE PARCEL
DR. BY: AL13ER i A. ASSOC3ATES
W.O.: 95-0212 CML ENGINEERS OF 1 SHEETS
F.B-- RIVE SIDE CALIFORNIA FILE NO.:
EXIMIT B
SCOPE OF DEVELOP FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
AND RETAIL PROJECT TO BE BUILT ON THE PREMISES
R:%A\A@@@ 2116M
-Id
T7
Al A'Iliy
/AV
ITEIA 6
z
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Redevelopment Agency
FROM:Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: Residential Rehabilitation Program
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:The Redevelopment Agency:
1.Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH THE RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAION
PROGRAM TO ASSIST PROPERTY OWNERS TO REHABILITATE
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING,
IMPROVING AND PRESERVING THE SUPPLY OF LOW AND
MODERATE INCOME HOUSING WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA AND THE CITY
2.Authorize the expenditures of up to $200,000 from RDA Housing Set-aside,
Account No. 165-199-813-5804, to establish the First Time Homebuyer
Program.
BACKGROUND
The City Council, through the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan, has established goals and
policies for the purpose of providing affordable housing for existing and future residents of
Temecula.As a first step in meeting these goals, the Agency adopted the First Time
Homebuyer Program to assist low and moderate income families in the purchase of single-family
homes. As a second step, staff is proposing programs that will provide for the rehabiltation of
rental and owner-occupied housing units to assist low and moderate income households. The
programs are intended for improvements to properties located within the Assigned Communities
(See Attachment No. 3). Assigned Communities are those areas which are identified as part
of the Temecula ONE Program.
Staff has developed the following rehabilitation programs (See Attachment No.2 for program
parameters). First, the Multi-family Residential Rehabilitation Program (MFRRP will provide
assistance to eligible multi-family property owners to rehabilitate renter occupied housing units.
Property owners will be allowed to borrow up to $3,000 per dwelling unit to rehabilitate rental
properties. Eligible improvements include painting, landscaping, tot lots, interior improvements
R:\STAFFRPT\REHAB.CC 8/19/96cdr 1
necessary to meet current Uniform Building Code requirement. As a condition of the loan,
property owners will be required to record an affordability agreement insuring that the assisted
units are guaranteed as affordable units for a minimum 30 year period.
The second program is the Senior Housing Repair Program (SHRP). The SHRP provides to
repairs grants up to $3,000 for senior owned housing units. Eligible repairs would include such
things as repairs or replacement of roofs, toilets, water heaters, wall heaters, thermostats,
swamp coolers or air conditioning, window frames and drywall. Participants would be required
to receive bids from two licensed contractors prior to performing any work. The Agency will
directly reimburse contractors for work performed. For eligible repairs less than $250, no bids
would be required to perform work. The program would be available to senior citizens with
incomes up to 120% of the median income..
The third program is the Single Family Home Repair Program (SFHRP). This program is intended
to provide home repair assistance to low and very-low income households. The program
consists of emergency grants, exterior improvement grants, and rehabilitation loans. The
emergency grants allow up to $2,500 for repairs necessary for the protection of the health and
safety of the home occupants as required by the Uniform Housing Code. The exterior
improvement grants allow up to $5,000 for improvements such as exterior painting and fence
repair. The loan program allows for up to $20,000 for those repairs described in the Senior
Housing Program. All three components of the SFHRP are restricted to the properties withing
the Assigned Communities and meet the low and very income requirements established for the
City of Temecula.
FISCAL IMPACTS
The 1996-97 CIP budget contains $200,000 for the Residential Rehabilitation Program (Account
No. 165-199-813-5804).
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. RDA 96- - Page 3
2.Program Parameters - Page 6
3. Map of Assigned Communities - Page 12
R:\STAFFRI'r\REHAB.CC 8,'19196cdr 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-_
R:\STAFFRP'r\REHAB.CC 8/19/96 cdr 3
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH THE
RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAION PROGRAM TO ASSIST
PROPERTY OWNERS TO REHABILITATE RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING,
IMPROVING AND PRESERVING THE SUPPLY OF LOW
AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING WITHIN THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE CITY
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and declare
that:A. The Agency is currently implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
RedevelopmentProject No. 1--1988, originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 12,
1988 prior to the incorporation of the City and subsequently approved and transferred to the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on April 9, 1991 (the "Plan").
B. The Agency has established a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33433 for the purposes of increasing,
improving and preserving the supply of low and i-noderate income housing within the Project Area
and the City.
C. The Agency proposes to establish the Residential Rehabilitation Program
to provide financial assistance to low and i-noderate income persons in the rehabilitation of
idential housin- for the purposes of increasing, improvin- and preserving the supply of low and
res t> C, C,
moderate income housina within the Project Area and the City.
&I
D. The rehabilitation of properties for low and moderate income housing
purposes is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and with the Implementation Plan adopted by
the Agency. Additionally, rehabilitation of properties and the improvement and preservation of
low and moderate income housing thereon will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project
Area.
E. The rehabilitation of properties and the units thereon is exempt from the
provisions of the California Environi-nental Quality Act pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code 15326.
Moreover, the EIR approvin- the Plan addressed the impacts of housing development in the area
of the Properties.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Temecula hereby approves the Residential Rehabilitation Program, authorizes the expenditure
R:\STAFFRPT\REHAB.CC 8/19196 @d, 4
of $200,000.00 from account nui-nber 165-199-813-5804, and authorizes the Chairperson to
execute agreements with individuals in substantially conformance with the parameters of the
pro-ram set forth hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP'FED by the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula on August 27, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, do hereby certify that tile Resolution No. RDA 96- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on Auaust 27, 1996, by the followin- vote, to wit:
AYES:AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
R:\STAFFRPnREHAB.CC 8/19196 cdr 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PROGRAM PARAMETERS
R:\STAFFRP'r\REHAB.CC 8119/96cd, 6
City of Temecula
Multi-Family Rehabilitation Loan Program
Property TypeMulti-family residences.
Property LocationWithin Assigned Communities (Old Town, Rancho Meadows, La
Serena, Ynez Road, Winchester Creek)
Maximum Loan Amount$3,000 per unit
Loan TermsNo payments or interest accrual for years 1-51, fully amortized for
years 6 through 15. Payment of entire loan is due if property is
refinanced or sold during the ten-n of the loan. The interest rate is
the prime interest rate at the time the agreement is si-ned.
In
RequirementsProperty owners will be allowed to borrow up to $3,000 per
dwelling unit to rehabilitate rental properties. Eligible
improvements include painting, landscaping, tot lots, interior
improvements necessary to meet current Uniform Buildinc, Code
requirement. As a condition of the loan, property owners will be
required to record an affordability agreement insuring that the all
units within the property are guaranteed as affordable units for 30
years., with 75 % of the units to be for low income and 25 % very
low income. A second condition of the loan will require the
property owner to record a maintenance agreement insurance the
upkeep of the property. Failure to maintain the property can result
in the calling of the loan.
R:\STAFFPPnP,EMAB.CC 8/21/96 dr 7
City of Temecula
Senior Housing Repair Grant Program
Property TypeSincle family detached homes, condominium units,
townhouses and manufactured homes.
Property LocationWithin Assigned Communities Areas (Old Town, Rancho
Meadows, La Serena, Ynez Road, Winchester Creek)
Maxinium Grant Amount$3,000
TernisNo repayment requirements.
Requirements$3,000 -rant for senior owned housinc, units (55 or older).
Participants would be required to receive bids from two
licensed contractors prior to performing any work. The
A,,ency will directly reimburse contractors for work
perfori-ned. Eligible repairs would include such things as
repairs or replacement of roofs, toilets, water heaters, wall
heaters, theri-nostats, swamp coolers or air conditioning,
window frai-nes and drywall. For eligible repairs less than
$1-50, no bids would be required to perform work. The
proc,rai-n would be available to senior citizens with incomes
up to I'/-IO% of the median income for the City of Temecula
R:\STAFFRPT\REHAB,CC 8/19/96cdr 8
City of Temecula
Single Family Emergency Grant Program
Property TypeSingle fai-nily detached homes, condominium units,
townhouses and manufactured homes.
Property LocationWithin Assigned Communities (Old Town, Rancho
Meadows, La Serena, Ynez Road, Winchester Creek)
Maximum Grant Amount$'-),500
TermsNo repayi-nent requirement.
RequirementsThe City will provide up to $2,500 dollars per home for the
paiiitliic, and the repair of fences. Participating households
i-nay earn up to 80% of the Median Income for the City.
Home must be owner occupied.
R:\STAFFRMRF-HAB.CC 9/19196cdr 9
City of Temecula
Single Family Paint and Fence Repair Grant Program
Property TypeSingle family detached homes, condominium units,
townhouses and manufactured homes.
Propertv LocationWithin Assigned Communities Areas (Old Town, Rancho
Meadows, La Serena, Ynez Road, Winchester Creek)
Maximum Grant Amount$5,000
TermsNo repayment requirements.
RequirementsThe City will provide up to $5,000 dollars per home for the
painting and the repair of fences. Participating households
i-nay earn up to 80% of the Median Income for the City.
Home i-nust be owner occupied.
R:\STAFFRi'r\REHAB.CC 8/19/9(,,d, 10
City of Temecula
Single Family Rehabilitation Program
Proper-ty TypeSingle family detached homes, condominium units,
townhouses and manufactured homes.
Property LocationWithin Assigned Communities Areas (Old Town, Rancho
Meadows, La Serena, Ynez Road, Winchester Creek)
Maximum Loan Amount$20,000
Loan TermsNo payments or interest accnial for the years 1-3, fully
amortized for years 4 through 15. Payment of entire loan is
due if property is refinanced or sold during the term of the
loan. The interest rate is the prime interest rate at the time
the agreement is signed.
RequirementsThe City will provide up to $5,000 dollars per home for the
painting and the repair of fences. Participating households
may earn up to 80% of the Median Income for the City.
Home must be owner occupied.
R:\STAFFRPT\REHAE.CC 8/21/96 cdr 1 1
R:\STAFFRI'r\REHAB.CC 8119/96cd,
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MAP OF ASSIGNED COMMUNITIES
1 2
!,I @i
11
1-@
. m -
s I-
1/1
@m
t ---
r
Lz3- Assign, d 0. @
Communities
ITE14 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE Dil
CITY MANA
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM:Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Temecula Pro Rodeo
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members consider a request for sponsorship of the 1996 Temecula Pro Rodeo.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has received a sponsorship request in the amount of $2,500 from the Temecula Pro
Rodeo, which is attached for your review.
Due to the fact that this activity promotes tourism in Temecula, funding would come from the
Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. There will be no commissions paid out
to any party for the City of Temecula's sponsorship.
The Temecula Pro Rodeo draws nationally recognized contestants to compete as well as
spectators and vendors from areas throughout California. Temecula's first-class rodeo will be
one of only ten "Wrangler Circuit Series" Rodeos in California this year. Special events
surrounding the rodeo will include the Temecula Rodeo Queens Pageant, a sanctioned Team
Penning Event hosted by the American Family Team Penning Association, and various Western
activities and exhibitions.
As a result of the event, there will be many new visitors introduced to the city filling up local
hotels and restaurants. Additionally, the rodeo will generate merchant sales and tax dollars
along with tourism dollars earned supporting local merchants for goods and services used by
the event.
Several years ago the rodeo encountered between 60% - 70% attendance for Friday and
Sunday performances and Saturday nights performance was sold out with limited advertising
for the event.
The City of Temecula will receive exposure both at the rodeo and in advertising and publicity
prior to the event. This will include a full page ad in the rodeo program, in addition to an
exhibit booth at the event and city recognition on all ads and tickets.
The Temecula Pro Rodeo media program for 1 996 includes:
0Home page on the Internet.
*Newspaper and magazine print ads reaching Los Angeles, Riverside and San
Diego Counties.
0Live radio coverage of the rodeo reaching Temecula, Banning, Riverside and San
Bernardino.
0Approximately 600 posters displayed in Riverside and North San Diego Counties
and 2,600 posters distributed to one of the sponsor's retailers.
*Rodeo brochures distributed at selected local businesses, the Temecula Tractor
Race event and at other Southern California Rodeos.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the Council desires to sponsor the rodeo, it will be necessary to appropriate the amount of
the sponsorship.
ATTACHMENTS:Sponsorship Package for the City of Temecula
Temecula Pro Rodeo Information Packet
ATTACHMENT
SPONSORSHIEP PACICAGE FOR THE CITY OF TE-MECULA
0Complimentary twentv-four (24) V.I.P. tickets. Eight (8) each day.
0Complimentary thirty (30) general admission tickets.
0Three (3) weekend parking passes.
9Exhibit booth in a preferred vendor area.
*Full page ad in the Rodeo program.
0Two (2) sicns in the Rodeo arena.
0Citv mention in all ads and on tickets.
0Brief ad read by announcer on Sunday.
aSponsor appreciation award.
Cost of Event Sponsorship Packaae@
a $2,500
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEI\4 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD AUGUST 13, 1996
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 7:50 P.M. at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Birdsall
ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
Authority Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
FINANCING AUTHORITY BUSINESS
1Minutes
Board Member Stone announced he would abstain on Item No. 1.
It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 23, 1996.
The motion was unanimously carried with Board Members Roberts absent and Board
Member Stone abstaining.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Ford, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn at
7:51 PM to a meeting on August 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Board
Members Roberts absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
Minutes.fa\072396
ITEI\4 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Wnager
FROM:Gary Thornhill@community Development Director
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Appeal of the Planning Commission's Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
for the offsite Sale of Beer and Wine at the proposed ARCO AM/PM at the
Corner of Winchester and Nicolas Roads (PA96-0073)
Prepared By: David W. Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:It is requested that the City Council adopt either of the following
resolutions:
1. RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR THE
PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD NOT BE SERVED BY THE ISSUANCE
OF AN OFF SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO
AM/PM MINI MARKET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD
OR
2. RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ON THE
PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD BE SERVED BY THE ISSUANCE OF
AN OFF SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO AMIPM
MINI MARKET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD
BACKGROUND
In 1994 the State Legislature amended Business and Professions Code Section 23958 to require
the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to deny an application for a license if the
premises is located in a census tract where the ratio of off sale retail licenses exceeds the ratio
of off sale retail licenses to population in the county. However, Section 23958.4 of the
Business and Professions Code provides that a city can exempt a premises from the mandated
denial requirement if the City finds that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8121/96 klb 1
by the issuance of the license. The ARCO AM/PM is located in a census tract that exceed the
county wide premises to population ratio. If such a finding is made, the State Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control would then review the application for the license and decide to
grant the license or deny it based on the criteria for issuance of licenses to sell alcoholic
beverages set forth in state law.
On July 1 5, 1996, the Planning Commission made a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
for the off site sale of beer and wine at the ARCO AM/PM located at the southeast corner of
Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. At the Planning Commission meeting, several residents and
a representative of the Temecula Valley Unified School District spoke in opposition to making
a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity and the possible granting of a beer and wine
license. While most speakers voiced a concern about the proximity to the high school (across
Winchester Road), others stated they were concerned about the potential for drug sales,
loitering and increased traffic.
Two speakers spoke in support of making the Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity and
the possible granting of a beer and wine license. They indicated that the approved ARCO
AM/PM was consistent with the General Plan, Zoning, and underlying Specific Plan. Both
speakers felt that the School District had made the decision to locate on Winchester Road with
the knowledge that commercial uses were permitted at the ARCO AM/PM location.
The Planning Commission voted 3-2 in support of the Finding of Public Convenience or
Necessity for the off site sale of beer and wine at this location. Commissioners Fahey and
Slaven voted against making the Finding. Commissioner Webster made the motion for the
finding of convenience based on the following factors: (1) The manner in which the business
would be conducted; (2) the specific mode of operation; (3) the ability of the business to
serve a niche in the community; and (4) the convenience of the location of the store In relation
to other operations which sell alcohol.
There are no reported cases or regulations prepared by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
at this time to specifically address the factors required in determining when a finding of "Public
Convenience or Necessity" can be made under the applicable statute (Business and Professions
Code Section 23958.4). The legislative history of the statute and the court's interpretation of
similar language in other contexts, however, indicates that a court reviewing a city's decision
on whether to make such a finding will afford the council broad discretion in making the finding
so long as reasonable factors are used and are applied fairly.
The Legislature has made the decision that a sufficient number of off-sale beer and wine
licenses exist in the County of Riverside, but if there is a need for additional business to sell
beer and wine within the City of Temecula, the Council may exempt the business from the
mandatory denial requirement with a finding that the "Public Convenience or Necessity" would
be served by the granting a license to this business. The City Attorney's office has researched
these issues and believes that the Planning Commission and City Council would be justified in
applying the following factors to the determination of whether to make the Finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity:
1 .The location and type of alcoholic beverage sales uses in the vicinity of the proposed
business and the impact the proposed business and the existing alcoholic beverage uses
will have on the community;
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 2
2.The nature and character of the proposed business;
3.The aesthetics, attractiveness and ambiance of the proposed business;
4.The manner in which the proposed business is to be operated;
5.The clientele to be served by the proposed business;
6.The ability of the proposed business to serve a niche in the community not filled by
other sellers of alcoholic beverages in the same area;
7.The convenience to the public of purchasing alcoholic beverages at the proposed
business as opposed to other available sellers of alcoholic beverages in the area; and
8.The contribution of the proposed business to the overall economic development of the
community;
9.The proximity of the business to other sensitive uses in the area which could be affected
by the sales of alcoholic beverages such as residences, schools, parks or religious
facilities.
The ARCO AM/PM proposes to sell beer and wine as part of its convenience store. The
convenience store operation will be approximately 2,796 square feet. In addition to beer and
wine the convenience store will sell such items as soda, snack foods, personal hygiene items,
and limited grocery items. The convenience store operation will be similar to ARCO AM/PM
operations at Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, Highway 79 South and Margarita Road,
and Winchester and Jefferson Roads. Currently, 6 grocery or membership stores are operating
within the City of Temecula and all of these all sell beer and wine. In addition, 12 other
convenience, liquor, or drug stores are located within the City of Temecula and sell beer and
wine.
Within one mile of the proposed ARCO AM/PM, the following businesses provide the off-site
sale of alcoholic beverages: Costco, the Chevron Station at 40635 Winchester Road, and the
Texaco Station at the corner of Winchester Road and old Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Within
three miles of the proposed ARCO AM/PM, in addition to the previously mentioned businesses,
the following businesses provide for the off-site sale of alcoholic beverages: the Circle K near
the intersection of Winchester and Ynez Roads, Food for Less, ARCO AM/PM at the corner of
Winchester and Jefferson Roads, Fast Freddies, Stater Brothers Market, Ramzi's Liquor, Brand
X Liquor, Vons Market, ARCO AM/PM near the intersection of Rancho California and Ynez
Roads, Albertsons, Savon Drugs, Lucky's, Thrifty Drugs, Stop Quick Mini Mart, and outside the
City Limits are Westons Deli and Market, Payless Drugs, and Hughes Market in the Murrieta Hot
Springs area.
If the Council does not make the Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity, the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control cannot grant ARCO AM/PM an off-sale beer and wine license for
this location. A Resolution to this effect is included in Attachment No. 1. If the Council makes
the Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
would then be authorized to consider the application and determine whether it should be issued
on the basis of state law. A Resolution to this effect is included in Attachment No. 2.
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 3
Attachments:
1 .Resolution Overturning the Planning Commission's Finding of Public Necessity or
Convenience - Page 5
2.Resolution Upholding the Planning Commission's Finding of Public Necessity or
Convenience - Page 9
R:\STAFFRPT@73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION OVERTURNING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
FINDING OF PUBLIC NECESSITY OR CONVENIENCE
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 klb 5
AT7ACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR THE PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD
NOT BE SERVED BY THE ISSUANCE OF AN OFF SALE
BEER AND WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO AM/PM MINI
MARKET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
a. ARCO has applied for a license to sell beer and wine at its proposed mini
market to be constructed a the southeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road in the City
of Temecula ("Project").
b. Business and Professions Code Section 23958 provides that the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control sliall deny an application for an off sale retail license if the
premises is located in a census tract where the ratio of off sale retail licenses exceeds the ratio of
off sale retail licenses to population in the county.
C.The project is located within such a census tract.
d. Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 provides that a city could
exempt a premises from the mandated denial of Section 23958 if the City finds that the "public
convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of the license.
e. On July 15, 1996, the Planning Commission made a finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity for the off site sale of beer and wine at the P '
roi ect.
f. This decision was appealed by Council member Roberts because the
importance of the questions presented by this matter require consideration by the full Council.
9. ARCO was duly notified of the date and time of the Council's consideration
of this matter and has been given the opportunity to speak to the Council.
h. All persons who appeared before the Council and asked to be heard on this
matter were given the opportunity to do so.
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 6
i. The Council has reviewed and carefully considered all of the information
presented to it in connection with this matter prior to making a decision on it.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds and determines that
neither the public convenience or the public necessity would be served by allowinc, an off sale beer
and wine license to be issued for the Project based upon the following:
a. There are a sufficient number of mini markets, convenience stores, and
supermarkets sellinc, alcoholic beverages within three miles of the Project so that an additional
mini market/convenience store type of use at this location will not enhance the convenience of the
public in purchasing alcoholic beverages nor would such a use be necessary to serve the public;
b. The nature and character of the proposed business is similar to, and in many
instances is the same as, other businesses within the City and there is no special convenience to
the public in having the use at this location;
C.Despite a comprehensive security prograi-n and employee training program
being proposed bythe applicant, the location of the proposed use is adjacent to a high school
which will make itdifficult to control the cyreat number of students expected to frequent the site
C,
as walk up customers and as gasoline customers;
d. There will be no special clientele to be served by the proposed business and
sale of alcohol;
e. The proposed business and sale of alcohol will not serve any special niche
in the community not filled by other sellers of alcoholic beverages in the same area as the
customers;
f. While all businesses are valued and encouraged in the coi-nmunity, the
proposed sale of alcohol at this location will make no special contribution to the overall economic
development of the coi-nlllllllity; and
9. The proposed business is adjacent to the new high school which has been
planned at this location for three years, is nearly coi-nplete, and will open shortly.
Section 3. The City Clerk sliall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 7
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
on August 27, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution
No. 96-was duly and re-ularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
t,
recyular meeting thereof, held on Auaust 27, 1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21196 kib 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
FINDING OF PUBLIC NECESSITY OR CONVENIENCE
R:@STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8121/96 kib 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR THE PUBLIC NECESSITY WOULD BE
SERVED BY THE ISSUANCE OF AN OFF SALE BEER AND
WINE LICENSE TO THE ARCO AM/PM MINI MARKET AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND
NICOLAS ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
a. ARCO has applied for a license to sell beer and wine at its proposed mini
market to be constructed a the southeast coriier of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road in the City
of Temecula ("Project").
h. Business wid Professions Code Section 23958 provides that the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control sliall deny an application for an off sale retail license if the
premises is located in a census tract where the ratio of off sale retail licenses exceeds the ratio of
off sale retail licenses to population in the county.
C.The project is located within such a census tract.
d. Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 provides that a city could
exempt a premises froi-n the i-naiidated denial of Section '-13958 if the City finds that the "public
convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of the license.
e. On July 15, 1996, the Planning Commission made a finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity for the off site sale of beer and wine at the Project.
f. This decision was appealed by Council member Roberts because the
importance of the questions presented by this matter require consideration by the full Council.
CY
ARCO was duly notified of the date and time of the Council's consideration
of this matter and has been given the opportunity to speak to the Council.
h. All persons who appeared before the Council and asked to be heard on this
matter were given the opportunity to do so.
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CCI 8121/96 kib 1 0
i. The Council has reviewed and carefully considered all of the information
presented to it in connection with this i-natter prior to making a decision on it.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds and determines that
the public convenience or public necessity would be served by allowing an off sale beer and wine
license to be issued for the Project based upon the following:
a. While there are a number of mini markets, convenience stores, and
supermarkets selling alcoholic beverages within the vicinity of the Project, the demand for mini
market uses is such that an additional mini market/convenience store type of use at this location
will enhance the convenience of the public in purchasing alcoholic beverages; and
b. Althou-h tile location of the proposed use is adjacent to a hi-h school the
Applicant has agreed to establish and maintain a comprehensive security program and employee
training program which should be Sufficient to control the students expected to frequent the site
as walk up custoi-ners and as -asoliiie customers.
tn
Section 3. The City Clerk sliall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21/96 kib 1 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
on August 27, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
1,June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Tei-necula, do hereby certify that the Resolution
No. 96- was duly and re(,ularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Tei-necula at
a regular meeting thereof, held on August 27, 1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\73PA96.CC1 8/21196 kib 12
ITEI\4 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:City Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT: County Free Library Advisory Committee Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
County Free Library Advisory Committee for a two year term.
BACKGROUND: The City was recently notified by Barbara Dunmore, Administrative
Manager for the County of Riverside, that the City's current appointment to the County Free
Library Advisory Committee has expired. Council asked that this matter be continued from the
August 13, 1996 agenda.
Staff has spoken with Ms. Marginia Kelly, who has been serving in this capacity and she
indicated a willingness to continue as the City's representative if the City Council so desires.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:Letter dated July 1 7, 1 996
Appoint a representative for the City of Temecula to the Riverside
R:\agends.rpt@appoint.Lib
JUL 2 1-QJ96
@m, Parrish
Riverside Counrv F-xecutive Office Coun@, E-xecunve Officer
July 17, 1996
Jeff Stone, Mavor
cc: June Greek
Citv of Temecula
43174 Business Park' Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
Subject: County Free Library Advisory Committee Appointment
Dear Mr. Stone:
Appointments to the County Free Library Advisory Committee (CFLAC) are for a term of two years.
On June 30, 1996, the term of your City's appointed representative, Marc,,ina Kelly, expired. In order
for the City of Temecula to have continued representation on CFLAC, a new or reappointment of a
representative must be made by the City Council.
Please forward a copy of the City Council's action on a CFLAC appointment for the two year temi,
July 1, 1996 to June 30, 1998, to me as soon as possible. I look forward to workin- with your
representative.
If I can answer any questions or provide further information, please call me at (909) 275-111 1.
Sincerely,
cc: Judith Auth, RCCPL
In9r) T @,-- a
Barbara Durunore
Administrative Manager
Robert T. Andersen Ad@strative Center
@,7oi o (ono@ @,c- i i r)n
,,z 1 i r)c
ITEIN4 20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Designation of Voting Delegate for National League of Cities Annual
Conference
RECOMMENDATION: Designate a voting representative and an alternate.
BACKGROUND: Each year at the League Annual Conference the member cities are asked
to designate the voting delegate and alternate. Every member city is entitled to one vote in
matters affecting municipal or League policy. The business meeting will be held on Tuesday,
December 10, 1996 at the Congress of Cities in San Antonio, Texas. If it is not possible for
a member of the City Council to be present, the Council may designate a city official who is
attending the conference.
I have attached the memorandum from the League President which further elaborates
on the voting procedures.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:Memorandum from Donald J. Borut, Executive Director, National League
of Cities
JSG
R:@rida.rpt'LOCCvote
National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Officers
League Washington, D.C. Pres,cen@
of 20004 Gleoory S LaSr)Ulka
mayor coi@@Dus onlc
Cities (202) 626-3000
F,,St V,c, P,,s,oe,r
Fax (202) 626-3043 Scn@.n"
Au2ust 9, 1996
b,. a,@ N
Co.nc@i met)er Pn,,aae,[)r,,,, Pennsv,@an,a
MEMORANDUM
pr,s,oe,,
C.IOIV@ LO@CL B@'@S
To: City Clerks of Direct Member Ci @t Lara@ At,.ni. Geo,c),a
E.ec,t,.@ D,,ec,,,
Donaia . b.,-,
From:Donald J. Borut, Executive Direc
Subject:Voting and Alternate Votincy Dele ates, Annual ConEiress of Cities.
c
December 7-10, 1996, San Antonio, Texas
DUE OCTOBER 11, 1996
The National League of Cities'Annual Business Meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesdav,
December 10, 1996 at the Congress of Cities in San Antonio. Under the Bylaws of the National
League of Cities, each direct member city is entitled to cast from one to 20 votes, dependin- upon
the cltv's population, through its designated votinc, delegate at the Annual Business Meetin-. The
table on the reverse side of this memorandum shows the breakdown of votes bv population
categories.
To be elic,'ble to cast the city's vote(s), each voting dele-ate and alternate votin- dele-ate must be
designated by the city using the attached form which will be forwarded to NLC's Credentials
Committee. NLC's Bylaws expressly prohibit vot roxy. Thus, the designated votin-
delegates must be present at the Annual Business Meeting to cast the citv's vote or votes.
To enable us to get yourcredentials in order and to provide your votinc, delegates with proposed
.National Municij2al Pamendments and proposed Resolutions prior to the Con2ress of Cities,
we ask that vou returnthe IVORY copy of the completed form to NLC on or before October II.
1996. A pre-addressed envelope is attached. Upon receipt of these names, NLC will send each
voting and alternate voting delegate a set of instructions on registration and rules -overnin- tile
conduct of the Annual Business Meeting.
To assist your state municipal league in selecting delegates to cast votes on behalf of the state
municipal league, please forward the BLUE copy of the credential fon-n to your state lealue office
and keep the WHITE copy for your records. A list of the state leagues is enclosed.
If you have any questions, please contact Lesley-Ann Rennie at (202) 626-3020.
CC:Executive Directors, State Municipal Leagues
LI
Past Pmside.ts: Glands E. ho.d. Mayor. O,Ia@do. Florida - Sharpe James, Mayo,. Ne.ark, Ne. Jersey - Cathy Rey.olds.
Anderso ,, M:yo,, Mi.nelonka, M,nnesola - Clarence E. Anthony, Mayor. South Bay Florida - Ken Bacchus, Councti@an-al-La,qe Kansas C,ty M,ssour, - Geoffrey Beciwilh, E.ecut,.e
D., "10,@ mas ach.setls Municipal Assoc,at.o@ - La,a fliskely. Counc.] Member Mon,o@.a Cal.for@.. - Eddie L. Blankinship. City Cou@c,l P,es,de@i B,,- Alat).@@ - Luciii. C.
Brogden, Co.nc,l Vice P,es,dent, Hyaltshiie, Mayla@d - John W. 13.tt. C..@c,l@an Cme.apeak.. V,,g@@,a - Carol Y. Clark. C ... C.Ile@b., Ea@i 0,@nq@ N@. - Larry R@ Curtis
Mayor, Ames. lo'a - Alvin P. DuPont. Mayor. Tuscaloosa, Alabama - John Ferraro. Cily Council P,es,(Jent. Los Angeles. California Patricia Figueroa. C..@c,i MemDe, Mo.nia,@ V,P.
Cai,io,..a Stan Finkeisloin, Executive Director, Assoc,at.on of Washington C.I,es - Paul Heimke. Mayor Forl VYavne. lnc@@a Jaes C. H.nl. VV-T
V,,g,n,a Linda L..re@ce, Alderman. Wa.sa., W,scons,n - Christopher K. McKenzie. Executive D,,ecto,. League of Kansas M.n,c.r)ai,t.@ - Beverly Melton, B..,c .1 Pr@,ae,l
Louisville. Kentucxy - David W. Moore, Mayor, Beaumont. Texas . Kathy M. Morris, Mayor, San Marcos, Texas - William F. Murphy, Mayo, Woo(Jr.dqe lll,,o,, - Thomas C. O.ens.
Counc,l Pres.cJe@t, Overland Park, Kansas David L. Perry, Sr., Mayo, Pro T.m. Piano Texas Mictnel J. Quinn. E.ecut,@. D,,@i., lnd,a@a Assoc.ai,.n ,f C@i,es and To-,@ - Alice
Schlenker, Mayor. Lake Os.ego. Oregon Larry L. Schultz, Co.nc,lman. Rockledge Florida Winston Searles. Mayo, Pro Te@ RoCk H,ll SO.T@ Cal.1,@. - Judy Fergus.@ Sha..
Counc,l@oman. Berkeley Missouri - Joseph F. Sinkiawic, Mayo,, Lo@es ParK, Illinois - Joseph A. Sweal, Executive Director Tennessee Municipal Leaq.e - Ma,ia@ B. Tasco, Co@nc,i.@,a@
Ph.ladelph,a. Pe@nsyNa@@a - Retard C. Theobold. Council Member. Grand Junction, Colorado - William E. Thornton. Mayo,. San A.T.@@. Texas - John R Thune, D,,eclo,
$0 @th Dakota Municipal League - Marcia Weaver. Counc.1 Member JacKson M,ss.ss,pp, - Thomas L. Werth, Mayo, Rochest@, M@c@.qa, - George C W,.ght. Jr., E.ec@j,,,
Delaware League of Local Go@ernments - Charles C. Yancey, Cou@c,tio, Boston Massacnusetis - Don Zimmerman, E@ec.t," D@,eCTO, Arkansas M,,,,,C,I)i, Leau,,
D@,-, C.I.,adc - Direct.,. K.,.@
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
t
ANNUAL CON'U'R'--SS Ot- rU'lTiL@ ci:
Number of Votes - Direct Member Cities
Article rV, Section 2 of NLC's Bylaws specifies as follows the number of votes which each mem'L)Cl-
cit,,, of the National League of Cities is entitled to cast at the Annual Congress of Cities.,
CITY POPULATION r 1990 c@e-nsus) ER OF VOTES
L7nder 50,000 vote
50.000 - 99,999 2 votes
100,000 - 199,999 4 votes
200.000 - 299,999 6 votes
300,000 - 399,999 8 votes
!if -ItOO.000 - 499,999 10 votes
@00.000 - 599,000 12 votes
699,000 14 votes
-'00.000 - 799,000 16 votes
-00,000 - 899,000 18 votes
'400,000 and above 20 votes
Notc: Member cities are required by the Bylaws to cast unanimous votes.
c@
STATE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
ALABAMA LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES IOWA LEAGUE OF CITIES
Perry Roquemore Thomas G. Brecieweg
P. 0. Box 1270 317 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1400
Montgomery, Alabama 36102 Des Moines, Iowa 50309-4122
(535 Adams Avenue - 36104)
LEAGUE OF KANSAS MUNICIPALITIES
ALASKA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE Christopher K. McKenzie
Kevin C. Ritchie 300 S.W. Bth Street
Executive Director Topeka,Kansas 66603
217 Second Street, Suite 200
Juneau, Alaska 99801 KENTUCKY LEAGUE OF CITIES
Sylvia L. Lovely
LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES AND TOWNS 1 01 East Vine Street, Suite 600
John J. DeBolske Lexington, Kentucky 40507-3700
1820 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007 LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
L.Gordon King
ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE P. 0. Box 4327
Don Zimmerman Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820
P. 0. Box 38 (700 North 10th Street - 70821)
North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115
(301 W. 2nd Street - 72115) MAINE MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
Christopher G. Lockwood
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 60 Community Drive
Don Banninghoven Augusta, Maine 04330-9486
1400 K Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814 MARYLAND MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
Scott A. Hancock
COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE 1212 West Street
Kenneth G. Bueche Annapolis, Maryland 21401
1660 Lincoln, Suite 21 00
Denver, Colorado 80264 MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
Geoffrey Beckwith
CONNECTICUT CONFERENCE OF MUNICIPALITIES 60 Temple Place, Second Floor
JoelCogen Boston, Massachusetts 021 1 1
900 Chapel Street, gth Floor
New Haven, Connecticut 06510-2807 MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
George D. Goodman
DELAWARE LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS P. 0. Box 1487
George C. Wright Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
P.0. Box 494
Dover, Delaware 19903-0484 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
James F. Miller
FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES 145 University Avenue, West
Michael Sittig St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
P.0. Box 1757
Tallahassee, Florida 32302 MISSISSIPPI MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION
Jim Borsig
GEORGIA MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION 200 North State Street
James A. Calvin, Jr. Jackson, Mississippi 39201
201 Pryor Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 MISSOURI MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
Gary Markenson
ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES 1727 Southridge Drive
Scott B. McDonald Jefferson City, Missouri 65109
3314 Grace Street
Boise, Idaho 83703 MONTANA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS
Alec Hansen
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE P. 0. Box 1704
Ken Alderson Helena, Montana 59624
P.0. Box 5180
Springfield, Illinois 62705 LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA MUNICIPALITIES
Lynn Rex
INDIANA ASSOCIATION OF CITIES AND TOWNS 1335 L. Street
Michael J. Quinn Lincoln, Nebraska 68508
150 West Market Street, Suite 728
Indianapolis, Indiana 462D4-2882
(over)
NEVADA LEAGUE OF CITIES RHODE ISLAND LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS
Thomas J. Grady Daniel Beardsley
P. 0. Box 2307 1 State Street, Suite 502
Carson City, Nevada 89702 Providence, Rhode Island 02908
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA
John B. Andrews Howard Duvall
P. 0. Box 617 P. 0. Box 12109
Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0617 Columbia, South Carolina 29211
NEW JERSEY STATE LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES SOUTH DAKOTA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
William G. Dressel, Jr. John R. Thune
407 West State Street 214 East Capitol
Trenton, New Jersey 0861 8 Pierre, South Dakota 57501
NEW MEXICO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
William F. Fulginiti Joseph A. Sweat
P. 0. Box 846 226 Capitol Blvd., Room 71 0
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 Nashville, Tennessee 37219
NEW YORK STATE CONFERENCE OF MAYORS AND MUNICIPAL TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
OFFICIALS Frank Sturzl
Edward C. Farrell 1821 Rutherford Lane, Suite 400
1 1 9 Washington Avenue Austin, Texas 78754
Albany, New York 1221 0
UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS
NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES Kenneth Bullock
David E. Reynolds 50 South 600 East, #150
P. 0. Box 3069 Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
VERMONT LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS
NORTH DAKOTA LEAGUE OF CITIES Steven E. Jeffrey
Robert E. Johnson 12 112 Main Street
P. 0. Box 2235 Montpelier, Vermont 05602
Bismarck, North Dakota 58502
VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE R. Michael Amyx
Susan J. Cave P. 0. Box 12164
175 South Third Street Richmond, Virginia 23241
Suite 510
Columbus, Ohio 43215 ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES
Stan Finkelstein
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE 1076 South Franklin
William A. Moyer Olympia, Washington 98501
201 North East 23rd Street
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 WEST VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
Lisa Dooley
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES 1620 Kanawha Blvd., #1 B
Richard C. Townsend Charleston, West Virginia 25311
P.0. Box 928
Salem, Oregon 97308 LEAGUE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES
Dan Thompson
PENNSYLVANIA LEAGUE OF CITIES 202 State Street - Suite 300
AND MUNICIPALITIES Madison, Wisconsin 53703-2215
John A. Gamer, Jr.
414 North Second Street WYOMING ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 Carl Classen
P. 0. Box 31 10
Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003
2
ITE1\4 21
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:TEAM Community Pantry Salaries
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MMAGER
That the City Council review and provide direction to staff
regarding funding to the TEAM Community Pantry.
DISCUSSION: At the Council meeting of June 25, 1996 staff was requested to provide
information regarding previous funding to the TEAM Community Pantry. The Pantry has
received funding from the Community Service Funding program to support their efforts to
provide a food program to the needy and homeless, as well as other services to the community.
Funding levels for the previous five (5) years are identified below.
1991/92 $15,990
1992/93 10,000
1993194 3,500
1994/95 1 o,oob
1995/96 10,000
Total $4
Since the inception of the Community Service Funding program in 1990-91 City policy has
required that City funds are to be used for 'funding of projects which occur during the fiscal
year, excluding normal operating expenses and deficit funding.' The City Community Service
Funding committee has established that the Community Service Funding program will provide
funding @ for services and materials provided to the community. The committee has
specifically refrained from funding salaries. Mayor Lindemans has requested funding salaries for
the pantry in an amount of $6,000 in the form of a matching grant, which requires a change
in Council policy.
It should also be noted that TEAM Community Pantry will be directly impacted by the Old Town
Entertainment Center project. The relocation of the pantry facility will be required. The
proponent of the project will be required to pay all relocation costs with no fiscal impact to the
City operating budget.
R: INORTONL IAGENDA SIPNTR YSAL.A GN 07116196
FISCAL IMPACT: The 1996197 Operating Budget has identified $100,000 for Community
Service Funding programs.
Attachments: City of Temecula 1996-97 Community Service Funding Program/Policy
R.'INORTONLIAGENDASIRVTRYSAL.AGN 07116196
of Temecula
Park Drrve m Temecula, CA 92590 n Wiiing @cire= P 0 Box 9033 - Terrecuia, CA 92589-9033
Fax (909) 694-1 999
CITY OF TEMECULA
1996-97
Community Services Funding Program/Policy
The City of Temecula, in its Fiscal Year 1996-97 budget, has allocated funds for
community service programs within the community.
Purpose
To establish a process and evaluation criteria for funding requests received by the
City from community based organizations (CBO's) throughout the year.
General P@
The City receives requests throughout the year for financial assistance from various
organizations which provide a variety of services within the community. It is the
City's policy to channel such requests through an annual review, thereby ensuring
that all requests are evaluated equitably and consistently; to enter into agreements
for specific measurable services; and, to ensure that recipients are held accountable
for providing the agreed upon services within the appropriate time frame.
Funding Philosophy
Requests for funding received from CBO's will be considered annually. Due to limited
resources, not all requests received can be funded. Therefore, it is not the City
Council's intention to fund each CBO request received; but rather, to evaluate each
proposal and, based on available funds, provide money and other forms of financial
assistance to those organizations which most effectively serve the needs and improve
the well-being of the residents of Temecula. Special consideration will be given to
proposals which replace or enhance services the City is responsible for providing.
The City Council encourages a goal of self-sufficiency for all local CBO'S. The City
Council supports-providing--seed money-to-new programs -that -will provide needed
services to the community, but discourages an over-reliance on City financial
assistance to maintain such programs on an on-going basis. Therefore, all CBO's
requesting funding from the City should continue efforts to develop stable private
funding sources.
A:196CSFICSF9697.APP 7116196
P, Fl,p,,
Community Services Funding Program/Policy (Continued) Page 2
ELIGIBILITY
Applications are accepted from tax exempt, nonprofit organizations and
individuals for the funding of projects which occur during the fiscal year,
excluding normal operating expenses and deficit funding.
Services should benefit the City of Temecula.
A written report should be presented to the City Council thirty days after the
completion of the project. In the case of an extended project, interim reports
may be required.
DEADLINES
July 22, 1996 - Applications available from the City of Temecula.
Auaust 22, 1 996 - Deadline for submittal of application for funding period.
Award recipients will be announced in October 1996.
CRITEMA
In making its recommendations to the City Council for funding, the Adhoc
Community Services Funding Committee will consider the following criteria:
a.Does the organization provide Community service excellence?
b.What is the size and make-up of the community service organization?
C.What is the public and critic reaction to the group?
d.Does the organization have a high quality of fiscal management?
e.Will the organization have longevity in the City of Temecula?
f.Has the organization been granted non-profit status?
9.Is there evidence of satisfactory service provided to City's citizens?
h.That the organization does not discriminate based on race, color, creed,
nationality, sex, marital status, disability, religion, or political affiliation.
1.That the organization does not require attendance or participation in any
political, religious or social activity.
A:t96CSFICSF9697.APP 7115196
Community Services Funding Program/Policy (Continued) Page 3
i.That the organization provide financial statements prepared (using an
appropriate method of accounting) to demonstrate sound financial
management.
k.That the organization provide a budget for the fiscal year of request
demonstrating cost-effectiveness.
1. That the organization provide high level of access to services offered.
M.That the organization possess ongoing program evaluation tools.
A:196CSFICSF9697.APP 7115196
ITEI\4 22
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY r@
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DATE:August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Temecula Valley Museum Loan Request
PREPARED BY:Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council:
1.Consider a loan request from the Temecula Valley Museum in an amount not to exceed
$60,000 for the completion of the museum building at Sam Hicks Monument Park.
2.Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and necessary loan documents.
DISCUSSION: On August 23, 1994, the City Council approved a lease agreement
with the Temecula Valley Museum ('Museum') which provided to the Museum a $500,000
grant for the renovation of St. Catherine's Church located at Sam Hicks Monument Park and
for the construction of the first phase of a permanent museum building also to be located in this
park. Work is nearly complete on the church and design has begun for the museum building.
Construction costs for the church renovation is$110,920. Design costs for both buildings is
$36,880 with a construction cost estimate of $352,000 for the museum building plus $35,200
for the 10% contingency. There will be additional costs for a water meter installation, phone
line installation, sewer connection fees, and other miscellaneous costs. Estimated cost for
these items is $25,000. The terms of the lease agreement require that prior to entering into
a construction contract, the Museum must be able to demonstrate to the City that they have
sufficient unencumbered funds to cover the cost of construction plus a ten percent
contingency.
The Museum believes that they will be able to raise a significant amount of funds through their
fund raising efforts, eventually to reduce the total loan amount owed to the City. However,
in order to fulfill the requirements of the lease agreement, the Museum is requesting a
commitment from the City Council for a loan up to $60,000. This amount is represented as
follows:
Design $ 36,880
Church Construction 110,920
Museum Construction 352,000
10% Contingency 35,200
Miscellaneous Costs 25,000
Total $560,000
r.\c\ag@ us. cc
The Museum is asking that the City Council approve the loan but not disburse the funds until
such time as they are needed. At that time, the Museum would execute a Promissory Note in
favor of the City, outlining the terms and conditions of the loan. They will request only the
amount of funds actually necessary to complete the project which may be below the maximum
amount of $60,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: A Grant of $500,000 from Development Impact Fees was approved by
the City Council on August 24, 1994. If the loan request of $60,000 is approved, it is
recommended that the repayment term be ten (1 0) years at prime interest rate. For example,
if the prime interest rate is 8.25%, the monthly loan payment would be $735.92 for a ten (10)
yearterm.
Also, on July 2, 1991, a initial loan of $22,200 was approved by the City Council from the
General Fund. The payments of $130 per month have been paid and are current. The
outstanding balance as of August, 1996 is $21,421.41. A balloon payment will be due and
payable on the balance owed to the City on June 30, 1999.
r:\c\agcndat@mus.oc
ITEIN4 23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/City Council
FROM:Ron Bradley, City Manager
DATE:August 27, 1 996
SUBJECT:Temecula Library Service Alternatives Feasibility Study
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council:
1 .Approve the proposal submitted by David M. Griffith & Associates to conduct a study
to determine the future fiscal viability of the Temecula Library.
2. Appropriate a maximum of $42,200 from Development Impact Fees - Library to fund the
City's portion of the Library Study.
DISCUSSION: In September 1 995, the cities of Temecula and Murrieta set up the
Temecula-Murrieta Library Committee to explore all resources available to fund the Temecula
Library at a service level of 48 hours per week. Library options include formation of a library
district, formation of a community services district, establishing the library as a municipal
library, and augmenting the 32 hours per week basic service level provided by the County by
contracting additional services. The Committee has determined that the next step in the
process will require an independent, comprehensive study to be conducted to analyze and
evaluate all options available to the Temecula Library.
Attached is a copy of a proposal from David M. Griffith & Associates to conduct such a study
at a total cost of $42,200. The Committee has requested funding support from the State;
County; Cities of Murrieta and Lake Elsinore; and School Districts of Temecula, Murrieta, and
Lake Elsinore. However, even if funding cannot be secured from these other sources, it is still
imperative that this Study be conducted to identify the best course of action for the Committee
to ensure the Temecula Library continues to support the community to the maximum extent
possible.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this Study is available in the Development Impact Fee - Library
fund. This funding source must be used specifically for Library capital improvement related
purposes. Since this Study will serve as a tool for future library planning, it is appropriate to
use DIF-Library to fund this Study.
Attachment - DMG Proposal
DMG
ProposaltoEvahmte
Service Altema@
TEMECLT.LA - A
LEBRARYTASKFORCE
David AL Griffith & Associates JuLly 26, 1996
Cupertino, Calffornia
DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Professional Services for the Public Sector
20111 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 145
Cupertino, California 95014
408-36&0260 FAX 408-36r--0263
DMG
July 11, 1996
Allie Kuhns
Senior Management Analyst
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA. 92590
Dear Ms. Kuhns:
David M. Griffith & Associates is pleased to present our proposal to
conduct a study of library service delivery alternatives for the Temecula -
Murrieta Library Task Force. We believe we bring a uniquely qualified
team to this project. More specifically:
Within the last year, the proposed team has conducted two
major evaluations of library service delivery systems. These
projects, which analyzed library services in Contra Costa and
Orange Counties in California, have each involved complex
evaluations of library service levels, financing, management
and operations, and governance issues associated with county-
wide library systems serving a wide diversity of communities
and library users.
Our team blends senior professional analysts and library
service professionals to provide the perspective of both the
professional evaluator and library service practitioner as the
operations and services of the Library System are reviewed.
The proposal which follows is organized in three sections. It opens
with an introduction to the firm and our project team; follows with an
overview of how we would approach the project; and concludes with our
estimate of project cost.
1.BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR FIRM AND
PROPOSEDPROJECTTEAINL
David M. Griffith & Associates was established nearly 20 years ago,
and in the intervening years, has grown to be the largest consulting ffim in
the United States which specializes in serving public sector clients. We
maintain a national network of 35 offices. Our client base includes more
than 2,000 city, county, and state government clients from every region of
the United States. In the Western United States, we serve our clients from
offices located in Cupertino, Carmichael, and Pasadena California.
[David M. Griffith.& Associates- Pag
Proposal to Evaluate Librarv Servt'ce
Deliverv Alternatives
Initially established to provide financial consulting services to
clients, the Firm's capabilities have been expanded to include executive
recruitment and management and operations analysis. The table which
follows shows illustrative assignments and clients which demonstrate our
experience in providing management and operations analysis services to
local government clients across the United States.
Client Name Nature of Our Work
City of Anaheim, CA Utilities Department Management Audit
Evaluation of Inspection Services
City of Beverly Hills, CA Public Works Privatization Study.
Recreation and Parks Strategic Plan
City of Campbell,CA Management audit of Public Works
City of Carlsbad,CA Feasibility of Merging Water District w/city
City of Chica-o, U- Management audit of the Water Department
City-wide Benchmarking Study
City of Concord, CA Management audit of Engineering
Service and Financial Evaluation of
Community Center
Contra Costa County, CA County-Wide Library Services Study
Management Audit of Corrections
City of El Cajon, CA Management Audit of Police @partment
City of Escondido, CA 20 Year Services Plan
Including Library Services
Mana-ement Audits of Police and Utilities
City of Glendale, CA Management Audit of Police Department
City of Hayward, CA Management Audits of Building.and Engineering
City of Hartford, CN Library Staff Scheduling Study
Kern County, CA Management Audit of Sheriffs Department
Management Audit of Planning
Kings County, CA Countywide Management Audit
City of Laguna Hills, CA Library Feasibility Study
City of Lon- Beach, CA Communications Consolidation
Manac,ement Studies of Towing and Fleet Services
City of Los Angeles, CA City-wide Benchmarking Study
Contracting Out Assistance
Grand Jury Management Audits
Marin Municipal Water DistricL CA Districtwide Management Audit
City of Milwaukee, WI Management Audit of Public Works
City of Moreno Valley, CA Library Financial Feasibility Study
Feasibility Studies for Police
and Fire Services
City of Mountain View, CA Management Audit - Police Department
apa County, CA Management Audit of Probation Department
City of National City, CA Mgmt. Audit of the Police Department
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates Page
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Client Name Nature of Our Work
State of Nevada - DFI&R Redesign Administrative Functions
Long Range Visioning & Strategic Planning
City of Newark, CA City-wide Management Audit
City of Newport Beach, CA Management Audit of Risk Management
City of Novato, CA Management Audit of Conununity Development
City of Oceanside, CAManagement Audits of Police, Finance, and Utilities
City of 0-den, LJTManagement Audit of Police Department
City of Orange, CAManagement Audit of Library
Orange County, CACounty-wide Library Services Study
Management Audit of Animal Control
City of Oxnard, CA Management audit of Community Development
City of Palo Alto, CA Citywide Management Audit Including Library
City of Pasadena, CA
City of Poway, CA
City of Richmond, CA
City of Riverside, CA,
City of San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino County, CA
Cltv of San Buenaventura, CA
City of San Clemente, CA
San Diego County
Management Audits of Six Departments
Citywide Management Audit
Management Audit of Parks
and Library Departments
Management Audit of Planning and Building
Management Audit of Police Department.
Grand Jury Management Audits
Management study of Public Works
Citywide Management Audit
Management Audits of Planning Department
City of San Jose, CAManac,,ement Audits of Police and Airport Departments
TQM Study of Neighborhood Services
Various Police studies
911 Implementation
Fire Master Plan
City of San Luis Obispo, CA Management study of Parks, Planning, and
Public Works Departments
City of San Mateo, CA Management Audit of the Library
San Mateo County Management Audit of Planning
City of San Rafael, CA Citywide Management Audit
Santa Clara County, CA Management Audit of Justice Agencies
City of Santa Clarita, CA Feasibility studies of Fire and Waste Water
City of Santa Monica, CA Management Audit of the Parking Enforcement
Program.
Shasta County, CA Management Audits of Probation and
Sheriffs Departments
Solano County, CA Countywide Management Audit
Health and Welfare Department Organization Study
City of South Pasadena, CA Citywide Management Audit
Including Library
City of Tustin, CA Management studies of Fire and Public Works
City of Visalia, CA Management Audit of the Fire Department
City 0 W. Sacramento, CA Management Audit of Police Department
City of Whittier, CA Management Audit of Fleet Services
Our Western Region management analysis group, which is
headquartered in Cupertino, California, is comprised of senior analysts
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates Page,3, -..1
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
who have extensive consulting and management experience in virtually all
aspects of local government services and operations. Rather than provide
lengthy lists of the firm's clients and previous projects, we believe that the
individual experience of the members of our proposed project team is most
relevant.
DMG believes that the personnel assigned to the project are the single
most significant factor in producing a quality product. We propose a team
which would be staffed and structured to provide the following:
Senior staff in all project roles.
A project team which has extensive experience in:
Conducting management and operations studies
of virtually every local government service area
including library services.
Managing and operating individual city library
and multi-jurisclictional library service systems
which focus on the feasibility of library service
delivery alternatives.
Current experience in analyzing library services
including governance, financing, and service
delivery as a result of our major library services
studies for Orange County and the member cities
of the'Orange County Public Library system, and
Contra Costa County and the member cities of the
Contra Costa County Public Library system.
The project team would consist of the following people.
John W. Heiss would serve as project manager and lead
analyst. Over the 25 years of his consulting career, Mr.
Heiss has managed and completed over 500 management
audits and evaluations of local government services. He is
the project manager of our current library services study
for Contra Costa County, and previously was project
manager and lead analyst on our library services study for
Orange County. Prior to joining DMG, Mr. Heiss was one
of the founding partners of Hughes, Heiss & Associates.
Beverley Simmons is a senior library service professional
with extensive operating and consulting experience gained
from over 20 years experience in the library service area.
She would assist the project team in evaluating service
levels and projecting staffing, facilities, and other
requirements for each service delivery alternative. Her
[David M. Grifftth & Associates P@E4!"
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
experience includes serving as Project Director for the
California Library Restructuring Project; Director of
Libraries for the City of Sunnyvale as well as two cities in
Massachusetts; and as a library services consultant for the
states of Massachusetts and North Carolina. She has been
a key member of the DMG project teams on the Orange
County and Contra Costa County Library studies.
Jacquelyn Harbert is a Manager with DMG and has 18
years experience in consulting to and working with public
sector agencies. Her role on the project would be to assist
with cost and revenue analysis associated with each of the
alternatives structured and evaluated. Ms. Harbert has
played a major role in our analysis of library services for
Contra Costa County including developing compensation
plans and costs for alternative library service
configurations. Her other consulting experience includes
more than 20 management and operations reviews covering
a wide variety of city and county government functions
including police, health and welfare, administrative
services, and personnel management policies and systems.
Greg Tananbaum is a consultant with DMG and is
currently working on our Contra Costa County project to
assist the team with collection of service level, system use,
and financial information. He previously played a major
data collection role on our Orange County Library Study.
He would play a similar role on this project. Mr.
Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
from the London School of Economics.
More detailed and extensive resumes of each proposed member of
our project team are provided as attachments at the end of this proposal.
Listed below are references you can contact to get their reactions
to the quality and practicality of our consulting work. They include
people with direct experience in working with us on major library
studies.
JohnAdnm.q
County librarian
County of Orange, CA
(714) 566-3040
I.a'b@ Sy@ms and Services Study
System-wide analysis of all aspects of library services for Orange
County and member jurisdiction of the County Library System. Included
evaluation of service levels and costs; projection of service costs to provide
idavid M. Griffith & Associates -P@e -5,41
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
DeliveTy Alternatives
alternative service levels; and feasibility analysis of alternative approaches
for organizing and delivering library services. This included elimination of
the County system and establishment of individual city libraries; regional
service groupings; and alternative governance and administrative
configurations for a County-wide system. Each alternative included
development of service, staffing, and operating plans including
requirements for provision of technical and support services.
Ann Marie Gold
County Librarian
County of Contra CA
(510) 646-6423
Library Systems and Services Study
Current project being conducted for Contra Costa County and the 18
cities which are currently served by the County library system. Focus of the
study is to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the system; identify service
and cost issues from the perspective of each participating jurisdiction; and
develop and evaluate alternative organizational, operating, and financial
approaches for resolving identified issues. Like the Orange County project,
this study is addressing governance and fiscal issues related to the delivery
of library services and will structure and evaluate individual city and
regional service delivery alternatives to the current County-wide system.
Dan White
As t City Manager
City of Laguna Hifls, CA
(714) 707-2620
Lib@ Feasibility Study
Project which evaluated the feasibility of the City of Laguna Hills
establishing a city library. Included conduct of community focus groups to
develop consensus targets for library services; evaluation of current service
levels provided to Laguna Hills by the County library system compared to
community expectations; and preliminary analysis of costs associated with
developing and operating a stand-alone city library.
We would be pleased to provide additional references upon request.
The next section provides a description of how we would conduct the
study.
2.OLTR PROACH TO THE PROJECT.
The section which follows describes the tasks we would accomplish to
structure ands evaluate library service delivery alternatives for Temecula
[David M. Griffith & Associates -6,
Pa.#d I
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Deliverv Alternatives
and Murrieta. The section concludes with a proposed project work
schedule.
Based on review of your letter of July 10, 1996, and my previous
discussion with you, I understand that Temecula and Murrieta have
formed a Joint Library Task Force to address service delivery issues and
begin to explore alternatives. We have assumed that this group would form
the basis for a Project Steering Committee. The proposed work plan which
follows describes when we would meet with the Project Steering Committee
and outlines the types of products we would submit to the Project Steering
Committee for review and discussion.
Task 1 --Meet with the Project Steering Conmiftee and Identify Major
Library Service Delivery and Funding Issues.
Beforeembarking on an analysis which structures and evaluates
governance, operational, and financing alternatives, it is important that
the project team understand the library service issues impacting Murrieta
and Temecula, and reach closure on issues and expectations related to the
project. As a result, we propose that the first task of the project involve the
following work steps:
0Meet with Riverside County Library Director, and key
management staff from Temecula and Murrieta to fully
understand current issues associated with the County Library
System including financial status, service level issues, and
service attitudes and expectations in Temecula and Murrieta.
0Hold a half-day to full-day workshop with the Project Steering
Committee and address the following:
Consensus or significant views on service issues and service
level expectations and assumptions which need to be
incorporated into the analysis. For example, should the
analysis focus on enhancement of services, restoration of lost
services, or some mixture of the two?
Are there service delivery and organizational approaches
which are not feasible and should be rejected from the study?
The product of this first task would be a detailed issue list which will
provide the basis for subsequent analytical activities.
ldavid M. Griffith & Associates.--,.,.--
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Task 2 -Determine Participating Jurisdictions'Attitudes Toward
Service, Organizational, and Financing Alternatives, and
Prepare Criteria Which Can Be Employed to Evaluate labrary
Service Delivery, Financing, and Governance Alternatives.
Whilewe recognize that the Project Steering Committee will provide
input from the service recipient perspective, we also believe that it is critical
that early in the study we conduct interviews with all elected and key
appointed officials from Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore to
determine attitudes toward alternatives, service levels, and city willingness
and financial capability to deliver library services under alternative
scenarios. It will also be important to identify Riverside County attitudes
toward potential withdrawal of the cities from the County Library system.
As a result, in this second task, we will:
ùConduct interviews with the County Administrator and each city
manager from the participating cities.
0These interviews will explore the following areas:
-City attitudes toward current library services including service
hours, facility location, service scope, and system
responsiveness to city needs.
-Interest in and reaction to alternative organizational forms for
delivering library services as preliminarily identified in
completing Task 1.
-Preliminary reaction to city financial participation in the
delivery of library services.
-County positions on withdrawal from the County Library
system including transfer of library service related property
tax revenues.
0Hold workshops with each participating city council to solicit
input on service levels, facility adequacy, and other relevant
issues. A member of our project team will meet with and facilitate
a one to two hour workshop with each group, summarize results,
provide the summary of those results for review by each group to
ensure accuracy, and based on written comments provided by
each group, modify summaries of attitudes and opinions as
appropriate.
0Based on the results of these meetings, we will develop a proposed
set of criteria which can be employed to evaluate specific
alternatives which will be developed in subsequent study work
tasks.
[David M. Griffith & Associates P@e8
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Finally, we will complement the evaluation criteria and interview
results with a set of proposed measures which can be employed to
structure alternatives over the next stages of the pr 'ect. These
03
will include such measures as the following and will include
proposed service levels to address issues and expectations
identified during workshops and interviews. They can be
expected to include:
-Facility availability to users from the perspective of location
and size.
-Collection replacement and enhancement rates.
-Collection scope in the context of service area population.
-Capability to meet future demands for both traditional and
non-traditional library services.
-Potential for development and sharing of specialized
collections.
-"Return to Source" equity in terms of revenues generated to
support library services and cost and value of services received.
-Others, as appropriate.
Once workshops and interviews have been completed and criteria
and proposed performance measures developed, we will- s-imTna--rlze results
in the form of a progress report which will clearly identify issues and
expectations by member jurisdiction and present and review the report with
the project steering committee.
Task 3 -Develop the Data Base Necessary to Support Structure and
Evaluation of Library Service Delivery Alternatives by
Developing a Detailed Profile of the Current Operations,
Service @vels, Costs, and RAevenues of the Riverside County
Library System as They Relate to Temecula, Murzieta, and
Lake EL-more and Surroundmg Umncorporated Areas.
Thepurpose of this third task will be to collect, summarize, and
analyze financial and operating data necessary to structure and evaluate
service alternatives including estimating costs of service restorations. This
will include the following work steps:
Document how the Riverside County Public Library System is
organized, staffed, and financed to include:
- Structure, staffing, role, and cost of central support and
administrative service units including such services as
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates
ag -79 -
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Deliverv Alternatives
new materials processing, central reference services,
and which services are provided at the
Central level versus those provided by the local branches
serving Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore, as well
as any other current library facilities which are related
to services delivered in the area.
- Nature and capabilities of automated systems currently
in place to handle circulation management, data base
access, and other library operating and service
requirements.
- Current staffing, service hours, and operating costs of
all branch libraries which relate to the Temecula,
Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore area.
- Location, service area, and basic characteristics of all
library facilities related to the area including:
Size and configuration.
Collections including type, scope and content, and
size.
Current utilization data as measured by
circulation and other available measures.
Facility ownership.
- Current expenditures for collection development and
replacement.
0Nature and scope of current volunteer programs including
level of volunteer efforts by program and facility.
0Current financial structure related to delivery of library
services in the participating communities including:
-Assessed valuation, property tax apportionment rate for
library services, and library service related property tax
revenue generated by city and the neighboring
unincorporated area.
-Other revenue sources generated based on existing
operations including fee for service and other user
related revenues, grants and subventions available to
public library systems, and the like.
IDavidM.Griffith&Associates,: P @Li -Ti 07-
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
-Any city contributions to enhance services above base
levels provided and funded by the County system.
-Existence and level of fees or funds (e.g. developer fees,
Mello-Roos Districts, etc.) currently established to provide
support for library facilities in the participating
communities or through the County Library system.
This would include current balances; projected growth in
future years; and basic nature of current fees.
ùOther factors related to projecting costs of alternative
structures and service approaches such as:
-Any library service related debt not yet retired including
amount, debt service schedules, and capital retirement
and interest costs.
-Deferred maintenance and capital improvements
associated with library facilities by facility and estimated
cost.
-Any other significant deferred costs.
0Any current plans to replace, expand, or enhance library
facilities by either the County or the participating cities
including nature, projected timing, and plans to finance
any capital improvement projects.
The results of this task would be documented in the form of another
progress report which would be reviewed with Riverside County Library
staff to ensure accuracy. Once corrected and completed, the progress
report would be provided to the Project Steering Committee for
informational purposes and would be employed by the project team as the
detailed data base for the subsequent development and evaluation of service
deliveryalternatives.
Task 4 -Benchmark Current Service Levels and Operations Against
OtherLibraries'Services.
Theprincipal focus of Task 4 will be to place current library services
and operations provided to Temecula, Marietta, and Lake Elsinore in the
context of library service levels in similar communities elsewhere in
California. This comparison will focus on cities which operate their own
libraries. Specific work steps will include:
Developing a proposed panel of other city libraries to employ for
comparative purposes. The panel will be selected based on such
factors as service area population and composition; service area
size; and number and type of facilities operated. Once the
idavid M. Griffith & Associates
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
proposed benchmark panel has been developed, we will review the
proposed comparative systems with the Project Steering
Committee and add or delete benchmark candidates as
appropriate based on that review. We expect that at least 15
comparative libraries should be surveyed to provide a meaningful
comparative data base.
0Then define benchmark criteria and collect comparative data. We
would expect to employ those comparative indicators as:
-Public service hours by facility.
-Type of access to automated services and data bases provided by
the libraries surveyed.
-Collections, facility size, expenditures, and other appropriate
measures compared on a per capita basis.
ùConduct the survey and develop detailed comparisons between
and among services currently provided in Temecula, Murrieta
and Lake Elsinore and the panel libraries surveyed.
The results of the benchmark survey will be documented in progress
report form and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee. Once the
review has been completed, the results of this task will be combined with
the results of the previous tasks to support a detailed analysis of current
operations and services in the next task. It will also provide the basis for
proposing specific service level criteria which can be employed to structure
and evaluate the alternatives in the next task.
Task 5 -Structure and Evaluate Alternative Approaches for
Organizing, Governing, and Financing Ubrary Services in the
Temecula, Murzieta, and Lake @ore Area.
Thepurpose of this fifth task will be to conduct a preliminary
assessment of the potential alternatives for organizing, delivering, and
financing library services consistent with your Request for Proposal. Major
work steps would be as follows:
0Review the results of the preceding work steps including
the initial work shops with the Project Steering Committee
in Task 1, and the elected official workshops and city
manager interviews in Task 2, and develop a list of the most
feasible models to be evaluated. This list could be expected
to include those outlined in the RFP, supplemented and
refined based on the analysis completed to this point.
0Develop preliminary i)ro-forma operating and revenue budgets
for each alternative from two perspectives: (1) Continuation of
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates
Page -.12..,;.1
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
existing service levels; and (2) Increase of service levels, either
to levels identified as targets through initial meetings with the
Project Steering Committee and elected official workshops and
interviews with the city managers in Task 2, and the results of
the benchmark survey.
-This would include development of proposed staffing plans
to provide services under each alternative including direct
public service and to provide the basic support services
needed to operate a library including collection materials
management, maintenance and processing; automated
systems, and the like. This would include exploration of the
potential for any of the locally controlled alternatives to
contract with the County Library system for some or all
support services including circulation/automated systems
and collection management support services.
-Other annual expenditures necessary to provide service
including collection replacement/enhancement; data base
and information network access; and the like.
-Any major start-up costs associated with the alternatives
such as:
Facility modification(s) required to accommodate any
additional public service needs as well as administrative
and support functions associated with alternatives.
Need to acquire and install automated systems
(circulation and data base access capabilities) associated
with the alternative.
Need to expand and enhance collections to function as a
stand-alone or joint library system outside of the current
County system. This would include the potential need to
upgrade locally available reference and specialized
collections to meet service needs.
The analysis would include identification of property tax
transfers associated with each alternative as well as other
revenues which could expect to be generated given information
collected and analyzed in Task 3. The analysis would identify
any cost-revenue gaps associated with each alternative, or
excess revenues available to enhance services above current
levels, both in total and from the perspective of each of the
participating jurisdictions.
Evaluate each alternative in the context of the evaluation
criteria developed in completing Task 2 and compare each in
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates Page -1 37-
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
the context of the performance measures developed in that
task.
Once the evaluation has been completed, the alternative analysis and
evaluation will be documented in a major progress report which will be
presented to and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee. The
purpose of this major progress meeting would be to thoroughly review the
content, advantages, and disadvantages of each of the alternatives and
select those for refinement and additional analysis over the remaining
tasks of the study.
Task 6 - Refine the Most Feasible Alternatives Including Identification
of the Steps Necessar-y to - Each and Projection of the
Financial Perform:Lance of Each.
Completion of Task 5 will have resulted in selection of those
alternatives which best fulfill governance, cost, revenue, and service
delivery objectives. In this task, the three highest rated alternatives will be
further refined by addressing the following issues:
0Determining how to implement the asset transfers which may
be required by one or more alternatives. This includes
facilities, collections, equipment, and other assets, as
appropriate.
0Refinement of any capital or other start-up costs associated
with each alternative including resolution of deferred
maintenance and capital improvement needs associated with
library facilities.
*Combine the above into detailed pro-forma start-up/transition
and operating budgets for each alternative, by year, for a five to
ten year period following implementation. This analysis needs
to incorporate the impact of population growth projected for
this rapidly growing area on service demand, costs, and
revenues in future years.
0Compare projected costs and revenue for the ten year period
and determine the scope of any cost-revenue gaps or excess
revenues available to invest in enhanced services associated
with each alternative. As appropriate, identify approaches for
filling any gaps -which are result from each alternative (e.g.
parcel assessment; fees for service; city general fund
contribution) and calculate amounts (both in total and in terms
of impact on service users, residents, and property owners)
needed to close the gap and meet target service levels.
Conversely, identify how excess revenues, if any, can be
invested in enhanced services and compare to the current
service delivery system.
idavid M.,Griffith & Associates a e 714
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
0Then, identify the legal steps necessary to implement each
alternative approach.
0Finally, identify any other transition issues associated with
implementing each alternative and evaluate steps required to
resolve each.
This task would involve preparation of a major progress report which
would include the analysis noted above. The report would be presented to
and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee in a major progress
meeting. Based on the results of that meeting, some alternatives may be
rejected as impractical from the cost, political, or legal perspective. The
meeting may also require additional analysis and/or clarification of all or
some alternatives. That analysis would be completed in the final work task
as describedbelow.
Task 7 -Recommend the Most Effective Altematives and Prepare the
Final ReporL
This seventh work task will involve:
0Refining the alternatives analysis based on the results of the
progress meeting at the end of Task 6. This would include
refining cost and revenue projections, as necessary, and
expanding implementation plans for all or selected alternatives
identified by the committees.
0Based on our analysis, recommending the alternatives which
we believe present the best long term options for Temecula and
the other jurisdictions
0Documenting the results of each of the previous progress
reports into the project final report.
Once the final draft has been reviewed by the Committee, it will be
produced in final form. We are prepared to present the final report as you
deem appropriate. Our work plan and cost estimate is predicated on
presenting the final report to the following groups:
The Project Steering Committee.
A joint meeting of the participating City Councils.
The chart which follows this page shows our estimate of the time
required to accomplish each of the tasks described in this section. As can
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates Page
Cl
co
CD
co
&. Ca
0
>
0 >
.0 C3
CD Cam
Ca w 4) < IZ
E > 4)
CZ CZ 0 u Ca C3
ci
w CD
S. rn
CD
cn
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
be seen from review of the proposed schedule, we estimate 13 weeks would
be required to complete the project as described in this proposal.
3.PROJECT COST.
The table which follows below shows our estimate of the professional
staff time required to complete the project as described in Section 2 of this
proposal.
Project Task Person Hours
1. initial meetings and issue identification. 16
2.Determine participating jurisdictions' attitudes toward
service issues and alternatives. 32
3.Profile current library operations, service levels, costs
and revenues. 64
4. Benchmark library services, costs, and revenues. 32
5.Structure and evaluate alternatives for delivering
library services. 96
6.Refine alternatives and develop detailed cost and
revenue projections. 88
7. Prepare and present final report. 40
Project Total 3ffi
The table which follows shows our estimate of project costs associated
with the level of effort noted above.
Professional Staff Time m
Project Team Member Rate per Hmw Person Hours
John W. Heiss $150 96 $ 14,400
Jacquelyn Harbert $100 112 11,200
Beverley Simmons $100 80 8,000
Greg Tananbaum 80 1 5,600,
SUB-TOTAL 36B $ 39,M
Project Expense
Travel $1,500
Subsistence 1,000
Report Production and
Communications 500
SUB-TOTAL $3,0001
1 PROJECT TOTAL $
We would be pleased to conduct the project for a fixed price contract of
$ 42,200.
idavid M. Griffith & Associates Page,--'@l 7
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Deliver-y Alternatives
We appreciate the opportunity to present our proposal. The
attachment to this letter provides more detailed resi-imes of each member of
our project team. We have previously provided you with a copy of our
Orange County Library Study as a work sample.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (408) 366 - 0260.
Sincerely Yours,
John W. Heiss
Director
IDavid M. Grifftth & Associates
Project Team Resumes
GREG TANANBAUM
Mr. Tananbaum will serve as
a Project Analyst
Mr. Tananbaumis a consultant with David M. Griffith &
Associates. He has been with the firm for over one year. Previously, he
worked in Australia as a private school instructor, specializing in courses
in government.
Since joining DMG, Mr. Tananbaum has participated in an
operating and financial evaluation of the Centre Concord. His
responsibilities included documenting and evaluating the competitive
market in which the Centre currently operates, and developing alternative
marketing strategies for the Centre. He also worked on a management
audit of the Mountain View Police Department during which he assisted
Mr. Heiss in the evaluation of field patrol staffing and service levels. He
played a major role on our Orange County Library during which his project
responsibilities included data collection and cost analysis of current and
projected library operations.
He is currently a member of our project team for the Contra Costa
County library services study. His responsibilities focus on data collection
in support of other team members. This includes detailed analysis of
branch library usage patterns, system operating costs and cost estimates
for service delivery/governance alternatives, and revenue analysis for each
of the various service delivery alternatives being developed by the project
team.
Mr. Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
Degree from the London School of Economics.
David M. Griffith & Associates
PROJECRTEAM
Proiect Tearn Resumes
JOHN W. HEISS
Mr. Heiss will serve as
Project Manager and Lead
Analyst
Mr. Heissis the National Director for Operations Improvement
for David M. Griffith & Associates and has been a consultant to local
government for more than 25 years. He was previously one of the founding
partners of Hughes, Heiss & Associates and earlier in his consulting
career, was a Project Manager with the international management
consulting firm of Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
Over the course of his consulting career Mr. Heiss has completed
over 500 consulting projects including a number of library service analyses.
Relevant project experience includes the following:
Evaluation of Library Services. He conducted operations
and service level analyses of library services for Palo Alto
and San Mateo; developed a facilities master plan for the
County of San Mateo library system; and evaluated the cost
and revenue impact of withdrawing from the Riverside
County Library system for Moreno Valley. Mr. Heiss also
evaluated library service levels for Escondido and identified
service level adjustments (and associated costs) to bring the
City to a "B" level of library service (compared to service
levels in similar jurisdictions elsewhere in California)
through City buildout. Last year, he conducted the
preliminary feasibility study of Lag-una Hills establishing
its own library compared to remaining part of the Orange
County Public Library.
Governance and Regional Library Service Studies.
Mr. Heiss is project manager and lead analyst in our
current library services study for Contra Costa County,
California, and the 18 cities which are member of the
system. The project includes detailed evaluation of current
operations and service levels; development and evaluation
of a number of alternative service delivery and governance
models; and conduct of a county-wide attitude survey to
determine citizens' attitudes toward the quality and
availability of library services. Earlier in the year, Mr.
Heiss was project manager and lead analyst on our
analysis of library services for Orange County, California.
This project evaluated current service levels; projected costs
David M. Griffith & Associates
Proiect Team Resumes
and revenues for a number of different service delivery
models; and recommended an alternative approach to
library system governance.
Mr. Heiss has an AB from Dartmouth College and an MBA from the
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
M.
-David Griffith' &.Associdtes
Project Team Resumes
BEVERLEY SIMMONS
Ms. Simmons will serve as a
Project Analyst
Ms. Simmons is a senior library service professional with
extensive operating and consulting experience gained from over 2 years
experience in the library service area. She would assist the project team in
evaluating service levels and operations, and structuring library services
under the various alternatives evaluated.
Ms. Simmons has served as a special consultant to DMG on both our
recent library systems analyses for Contra Costa and Orange counties. On
both projects, she had responsibility for developing alternative service
delivery models including defining service levels and developing pro-forma
operating budgets. She is currently working with the City of Mission Viejo
to develop an operating plan for the new City library. She has also recently
completed an evaluation of the Marin County Library system.
Ms. Simmons served as Project Director of the 1994-1995 California
Library Restructuring Project conducted by a 25 person Task Force
commissioned by the League of California cities, the California Library
Association, the California State Association of Counties, and the
California Association of Library Trustees and Commissioners. The
project focused on addressing the underlying issues of library governance
and finance, and provided a blueprint for fundamental change in
California library services.
Previously she served as Director of Libraries for the City of
Sunnyvale and during this period, in addition to directing all aspects of
library services, expanded library services to the Silicon Valley business
community by establishing a partnership between the City and the Federal
Patent and Trademark Office to bring the latest patent information and
technology to Silicon Valley. Concurrently, she also served as the Director
of Information Management Services for Sunnyvale and in this capacity,
directed information systems staff and services, developed a City-wide
networking plan, and introduced personal computers throughout the City.
Ms. Simmons has also served as City Librarian in two
Massachusetts cities, and as a library services consultant for the states of
Massachusetts and North Carolina.
She is active in state and national library service organizations, and
has chaired several panels on library services for the California League of
Cities. Ms. Simmons has Bachelor of Arts, and a Masters in Library
Science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
David M. Grifftth & Associates
Project Team Resumes
JACQUELYN HARBERT
Ms. Harbert will serve as a
Project Analyst
Ms. Harbertis a Manager in our Cupertino, CA office. She has
a BA in Psychology (Cum Laude) from the University of Southern
California and Master's degrees in Educational Counseling and in Public
Administration. Her 18 years of public sector experience encompasses a
wide range of consulting and administrative positions.
Specific experience includes:
Playing a major role in our analysis of library services for
Contra Costa County and 18 member cities. Her
responsibilities included profiling current service levels'
conducting focus group work shops with a number of
member city councils to identify library service issues, and
develop, cost out, and evaluate a variety of organizational
and operational library service delivery alternatives
Task leader for the City of San Jose (Pop. 830,000) study
group which reviewed and developed recommendations to
streamline the budget development information and
reporting requirements.
Managed a self-insured workers' compensation program
for Alameda County (CA - Pop. 1.3 million), reduced the
backlog of litigated cases, and significantly improved
interdepartmental cooperation through training of over 800
departmental management personnel in workers'
compensation issues.
aAnalyzed and developed an approach to consolidating three
distinct county operations into existing departments for
Alameda County, CA (Pop. 1,275,000).
0Assisted the City/County of Denver in improving efficiency
and management of building maintenance operations.
0Reviewed operational effectiveness of City of Huntington
Beach, CA (Pop. 180,000) workers' compensation program.
0Assisted the City of Los Angeles, CA in benchmarking all of
its general fund operations.
David M.'Griffith & Associates
Project Team Resumes
GREG TANANBAUM
Mr. Tananbaum will serve as
a Project Analyst
Mr. Tananbaumis a consultant with David M. Griffith &
Associates. He has been with the firm for over one year. Previously, he
worked in Australia as a private school instructor, specializing in courses
in government.
Since joining DMG, Mr. Tananbaum has participated in an
operating and financial evaluation of the Centre Concord. His
responsibilities included documenting and evaluating the competitive
market in which the Centre currently operates, and developing alternative
marketing strategies for the Centre. He also worked on a management
audit of the Mountain View Police Department during which he assisted
Mr. Heiss in the evaluation of field patrol staffing and service levels. He
played a major role on our Orange County Library during which his project
responsibilities included data collection and cost analysis of current and
projected library operations.
He is currently a member of our project team for the Contra Costa
County library services study. His responsibilities focus on data collection
in support of other team members. This includes detailed analysis of
branch library usage patterns, system operating costs and cost estimates
for service delivery/governance alternatives, and revenue analysis for each
of the various service delivery alternatives being developed by the project
team.
Mr. Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
Degree from the London School of Economics.
David,M.-,Griffith,--&Associates%,,,.
OFFICE DIRECTORY
Corporate Headquarters Indiana Ohio (continued)
630 Dundee Rd.. Suite 200 1 0 1 W. Ohio SL, Suite 1730 700 Ackerman Rd.. Suite 150
Northbrook. IL 60062 Indianapolis. IN 46204 Columbus, OH 43202
1-800-291-9270 Tel: (3 17) 634-7D40 Tel: (614) 447-0288
DMG Tel: (708) @-9270 Fax: (3 17) 637-7835 Fax: (614) 447-0626
Fax: (708) 56,4-9136 Iowa Pennsylvania
Arizona 1 14 Public Square 500 Nationwide Dr.
I 1 30 E. Missouri Ave. Greenfield. IA 50849 Suite 200
Suite 550 Tel: (5 15) 343-7352 Harrisburg, PA 171 1 0
Phoenix. AZ 85014 Kansas Tel: (717) 233-2600
Tel: (602) 277-2330 940 N.Tyier Rd., Suite 20.4 Fax: (717) 652-2881
Fax: (602) 279-7174 Wichita, KS 67212 Puerto Rico
California Tel: (316) 729-0732 Midtown Building, Suite 614
57 1 5 Marconi Ave.. Suite A Fax: (316) 729-0733 420 Ponce de Leon Ave,
Carmichael. CA 95608
Tel: (916) 485-8102 Louisiana Hato Rey, PR 009 1 8
Fax: (916) 485-01 1 1 302 North Pine Tel: (809) 753-6503
DeRidder. LA 70634 Fax: (809) 250-7906
201 1 1 Stevens Creek Blvd. Tel: (318) 463-7933 South Carolina
Suite 145 Fax: (318) 463-8077 121 Executive Center- Dr.
Cupertino. CA 95014
Tel: (408) 366-0260 Maryland Suite 206
Fax: (408) 366-0263 1350 Piccard Dr.. Suite IGO Columbia, SC 292 1 0
Rockville, MD 20850 Tel: (803) 772-2014
221 E.Wainut.Suite 179 Tel: (301) 869-2002 Fax: (803) 772-2186
Pasadena. CA 91 1 01 Fax: (301) 869-1494 Tennessee
Tel:(S 18) 564-0-401
Fax: (818) 564-1689 Michigan 301 S. Perimeter Park Dr.
2212 26th St. Suite 100
Canada Bay City, MI 48708 Nashville,TN 37211
Suite 202 Tel: (5 1 7) 894-2002 Tel: (615) 781-4399
542 Mount Pleasant Road Fax: (5 17) 894-5075 Fax: (615) 781-4243
Toronto. ON M4S 2M7 Texas
Tel: (416) 488-4666 MAC. Building 13601 Preston Rd.
Fax: (416) 445-7547 935 N. Washington Ave. Suite 40OW
Colorado Lansing. MI 48906 Dallas,TX 75240
10200 E. Girard Ave. Tel: (517) 484-4240 Tel: (214) 490-9990
Building B, Suite 223 Fax. (5 17) 484-301 1 Fax: (214) 490-3040
Denver, CO 80231 Minnesota
8303 Southwest Freeway
Tel: (303) 755-1996 555 Park St.. Suite 408 Suite 900
Fax: (303) 755-5490 SL Paul, MN 55 103
Tel: (612) 292-9225 Houston.TX 77074
Florida Tel: (713) 541-5457
Fax:(612) 292-0243
1621 Metropolitan Blvd. Fax: (713) 541-6649
Suite 201 Nebraska
Tallahassee, FL 32308 306 E.Seventh Utah
Tel: (904) 386-1 1 01 York. NE 68467 P. 0. Box 51471
Fax: (9D4) 38@3599 Tel: (402) 362-2298 Provo. UT 84605
Tel:(80 1) 377-0 1
Lakeview Corporate Center Fax: (402) 362-6727
Virginia
64 1 5 L2ke Worth Road, Suite 312 New York
5001 W. Village Green Dn
West Palm Beach. FL 33463 14 Computer Drive East
Suite 205
Tel: (407) 967-1700 Albany, NY 12205
Fax: (407) 967-1799 Tel: (5 1 8) 446-1302 Midlothian,VA 23112
Tel:(804) 744-2390
Georgia North Carolina Fax: (804) 744-451 1
1280 W. Peachtree St. I 100 Logger Court Washington
Suite 200 Suite D- I 00 120 State Ave., N.E,
Atlanta, GA 30309 Raleigh, NC 27609
Tel: (404) 874-6696 Tel: (919) 876-8042 Suite 401
Fax: (404) 874-5590 Fax: (919) 878-8592 Olympia,WA 98501
Tel:(206) 9@0912
Illinois Ohio Fax: (206) 754-1797
525 E. Pine 9930 johnnycake Ridge Rd.
Springfield. IL 62703 Suite 2G Wisconsin
2445 Darwin Rd., Suite 201
Tel: (217) 789-00-41 Concord Township, OH 44060
Tel: (217) 789-0042 Tel: (216) 639-0288 Madison,Wl 53704
Fax: (217) 789-6342 Fax: (216) 639-1328 Tel: (608) 244-3090
Fax:(608) 244-3560
DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
DEPARTI\4ENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
DATE: August 27,1996
SUBJECT:Building and Safety July 1996, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for July, 1996.
Building Permits Issued 255
Building Valuation $14,086,432
Revenue Collected $129,941
Housing Starts 113
New Commercial Starts 2 68,532 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations 12 9,037 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections 1,834
Code Enforcement Actions 921
Weed Follow-up Actions 740
Active Cases Pending 77
Closed Cases 21
V:\WP\Ag@a.RepUuly'96.Rpt
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRE P OF FINANCE.4
CITY MANAGER f @
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:City Manager/Cit l@ ncil
FROM:Debbie Ubnosk@,/Planning Manager
DATE:August 27, 1 996
SUBJECT:Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:Receive and File
Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development
Department's/Plann'ng Division caseload and project activity for
I
the month of July 1 996:
Caseload Activity:
The Department received 7 applications for administrative cases and 6 applications for public
hearing cases for the month of July.
The following are the public hearing cases:
Minor Conditional Use Permit 1
Parcel Map - Schedule E - Sewers 1
Development Plan Subject to CEQA 4
TOTAL 6
OnQoinQ Projects:
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Proiect: The Sixth Street Parking Lot Master Plan.
Webb & Associates will be designing the offsite improvements and standards for the
related components of the project. These will be used as design standards for off-site
improvement in Old Town, along with the Old Town Streetscape Standards and was
approved by the City Council at the March 1 2, 1 996. The anticipated ground breaking
ceremony for the 6th Street project is September 1 3, 1 996.
Murdy Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental lmgact Report: Staff is awaiting re-
submittal of the draft SP and EIR. Staff will review and determine if the EIR can be
circulated and SP can be set for Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting.
R:%MONTHLY.RPT\1996\AIJGIJST-WIID 9120/96 klb 1
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The applicant has informed staff that they will be
withdrawing their application.
Roril2auah Ranch Specific Plan@ The Planning Commission held a public workshop on
September 11, 1995 and directed the applicant to reduce the density and the total
number of units as well as to be more sensitive to the surrounding land use by
increasing the buffer area and providing a transition of lot sizes. The Commission
provided additional direction to the applicant. No future hearing date has been
established.
Temecula Shuttle: Located along Front Street within the 6th Street public parking lot,
this project includes construction of a 1 860 square foot building, four bus spaces and
public seating areas within landscaped areas. This project was approved at the February
22, 1996 Directors' Hearing. The anticipated ground breaking is set for November 1,
1996.
Sign Ordinance: The committee continues to meet every two weeks to discuss future
community wide sign standards. These meetings are expected to continue into
September. Planning Commission and City Council hearings are expected in October
and November.
Attachment:
1.Revenue and Status Report - Page 3
R:\MONTHLY.RP'r%1996\AUGUST.WPD 8/20/96 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:\MONTHLY.R@@1996\AUC,UST.WPD 8/20/96 kil, 3
REVPRIN2 CITY OF TEMECULA pp, 1
08/05/96 08:29:21 REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JULY 1996
001 GENERAL FUND
161 PLANNING
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JULY 1996-97 BALANCE % COL
ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE
4101 AMENDED FINAL MAP
4102 APPEALS
4103 CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
4104EXTENSION OF TIME
4105SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS
4106MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS
4107PARCEL MAPS
4108LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
4109MINOR CHANGE
4110PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
4111RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS
4112REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
4113SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
4114SECOND UNIT PERMITS
4115CHANGE OF ZONE
4116CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
4117CONSISTENCY CHECKS
4118GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4119PLOT PLAN
4120PUBLIC USE PERMIT
4121REVISED PERMIT
4122SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
4123SPECIFIC PLAN
4124SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
4125TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
4126TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
4127VARIANCE
4128ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
4129CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES)
4130CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT
4131DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
4132GEOLOGY CEQA
4133GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ
4134LAFCO
4135PARCEL MAP/WAIVER
4136MERGER
4137AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP
4138CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
4139CONDO TRACT MAP
4140REVERSION TO ACREAGE
4141LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
4142LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
4143CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK
4144CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK
4145COND. CERT. OF CC)MPL. PLN. CK.
4146CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK
.00 .00 .00 .00
702.00 .00 .00 702.00 0.0
3,348.00 .00 .00 3,348.00 0.0
6,750.00 352.00 352.00 6,398.00 5.2
9,396.00 .00 .00 9,396.00 0.0
6,590.00 .00 .00 6,590.00 0.0
7,173.00 4,743.20 4,743.20 2,429.80 66.1
2,300.00 .00 .00 2,300.00 0.0
470.00 .00 .00 470.00 0.0
1,000.00 .00 .00 1,000.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
392.00 .00 .00 392.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
1,483.00 .00 .00 1,483.00 0.0
10,984.00 .00 .00 10,984.00 0.0
15,108.00 .00 .00 15,108.00 0.0
5,735.00 .00 .00 5,735.00 0.0
8,256.00 .00 .00 8,256.00 0.0
19,075.00 9,817.00 9,817.00 9,258.00 51.5
.00 .00 .00 .00
11,261.00 .00 .00 11,261.00
528.00 .00 .00 528.00
9,254.00 .00 .00 9,254.00 0.0
880.00 1,480.00 1,480.00 600.00- 168.2
.00 176.00 176.00 176.00- ***
2,640.00 .00 .00 2,640.00 0.0
2,952.00 .00 .00 2,952.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
15,904.00 1,776.85 1,776.85 14,127.15 11.2
6,202.00 .00 .00 6,202.00 0.0
16,000.00 .00 .00 16,000.00 0.0
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 500.00 500.00 500.00-
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 .00
P- -@N2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
96 08:29:21 REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JULY 1996
001 GENERAL FUND
161 PLANNING
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED JULY 1996-97 BALANCE % COL
ESTIMATE REVENUE REVENUE
4147 VACATIONS PLAN CK .00 .00 .00 .00
4148 DOCUMENT PROCESSING .00 .00 .00 .00
4149 CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4150 REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4151 PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4152 TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4153 AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK .00 .00 .00 .00
4154 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS .00 .00 .00 .00
4155 FEMA STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4156 LOMA REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4157 DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW .00 .00 .00 .00
4169 IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE .00 .00 .00 .00
4170 K-RAT STUDY FEES 1,480.00 .00 .00 1,480.00 0.0
4175 FAST TRACK PLANNING .00 .00 .00 .00
4180 FORMA FAST TRACK .00 .00 .00 .00
4200 IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS .00 1,050.00 1,050.00 1,050.00-
4206 ANNEXATION FEES 710.00 .00 .00 710.00 0.0
4226 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT .00 .00 .00 .00
4260 ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY .00 .00 .00 .00
4"' LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE .00 .00 .00 .00
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY .00 .00 .00 .00
4, LAND DIV UNIT MAP 374.00 .00 .00 374.00 0.0
4370 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK 15,296.00 5,235.00 5,235.00 10,061.00 34.2
PLANNING 182,243.00 25,130.05 25,130.05 157,112.95 13.8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 27, 1996
SUBJECT:Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for July, 1996.
r:\agdrpt%moactrpt/ajp
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
AUGUST, 1996
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo /ZS
Date:August 27, 1996
1. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. 1-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modificationse
The contractor has installed the concrete foundation piles and footing for both bridge
abutments and the center support column. The existing drainage channel adjacent
to Palm Plaza has been replaced and a new underground storm drain has been
completed along the new northbound exit ramp. Structural work is continuing with
the construction of the center support columns. The contractor is scheduled to begin
bridge falsework following the retaining wall located under the bridge.
2. Fire Station #8 :
The contractor has nearly completed the rough framing for both the office and living
areas. Roof framing is scheduled for completion at the end of August. Installation
of the interior mechanical/electrical improvements is presently underway and drywall
installation will begin the last week of August. Electrical conduit installation for the
building and street lights is nearly complete. The fire line to the building has also
been completed.
3. Walcott Corridor:
The project has been awarded to Genesis Construction and a pre-construction
meeting was held on July 25, 1996. The contractor will start moving his equipment
onto the job site the week of August 19. The first items of work include removal and
replacement of the underground waterline and grading for the new road. The
contractor is expected to complete the improvements in May 1997.
4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Pro.jecto
The contractor has completed the restroom building exterior and is finishing interior
plumbing items. Work on the landscaping continues and installation of the play area
surface and various park amenities is underway. The improvements include the
construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and restroom facility, asphalt
parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site
amenities. The project is scheduled to be completed by October 1996.
5. Traffic Signal at Route 79S and Maroarita Road/Redhawk Parkway:
City staff and the signal contractor have discussed coordination of this project with
County Assessment District and preliminary work is expected to begin towards the
end of August. The traffic signal poles and mastarms have been delivered to the city
yard and the project is expected to be completed in late October, 1 996. This project
includes installation of a fully actuated 4-way traffic signal, signing and striping and
removal of the median island on Redhawk Parkway.
r:\-oactrptkcip\98\&4.Lopd
Monthly Activity Report
August 27, 1996
Page 2
6. Interim Traffic Sicinal at Route 79S and Pala Road*
All of the underground work has been completed and the foundation for the traffic
signal poles are in place. The Southern California Edison has also installed the signal
service and the signal poles, mastarms and the traffic lights are anticipated to be
installed and be in operation by the end of August. This 3-way interim traffic signal
will be replaced when the 79(S) is widened by the County Assessment District
Project.
7. Interim Traffic Signal at Route 79S and La Paz Streete
The traffic signal equipment has been ordered and is ready to be delivered to the site.
A request has been submitted to the Southern California Edison for installation of
service equipment. Work is expected to begin in late August and be completed by
late September. This 4-way interim signal will be replaced upon completion of County
Assessment District Project which will widen 79 South.
8. Rancho California/Santa Cecilia Sidewalk Project No. 5a
The contractor has completed the proposed sidewalk improvements which provided
for a new sidewalk on the north side of Santa Cecilia Drive between Mira Loma Drive
and Cosmic Drive.
9. North/South Restroom Facility*
The work will include modifying both the men and women's restrooms at the
North/South ball fields in the Rancho California Sports Park to conform with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements and adding a A.C. handicap parking
space just north of the existing building. Work is anticipated to start in September
due to the long lead time for materials.
10, Sports Park Creek Restoration:
The concrete wall<way and adjacent landscape improvements are complete along with
the installation of the gabion channel slope protection. The installation of the
irrigation system and the planting of trees along the stream bank is presently
underway. Completion of the improvements is scheduled for August 26th followed
by a 90 day landscape maintenance period.
1 1. City Hall Modification:
Installation of the mechanical and electrical on the second floor is complete along
with the fire sprinkler system. Drywall installation is complete with finish wall
painting underway. Ceiling lights are in and the installation of the acoustical ceiling
has started. The contractor has also completed placement of the door frames and
doors. Final completion of the improvements is scheduled for the middle of
September.
r:Vnoactrpt\cip\96@.upd
Monthly Activity Report
August 27, 1996
Page 3
12, Traffic Signal at Margarota Road and Rustic Glen Drivea
The project has been awarded and a pre-construction meeting was held on August
6, 1996. The signal poles and controller have been delivered and the contractor is
expected to start work the week of August 19, 1996. The signal is scheduled to be
up and running by the end of September.
13, Emerciency Generator:
The project includes installing an emergency generator at the Community Recreation
Center to provide power for emergency operations. The contract was awarded to
Rohm Construction, Inc. by City Council on August 13, 1996. Upon receipt of an
executed contract a pre-construction meeting will be scheduled. Project construction
is anticipated to begin the first week of September 1996.
14, City-Wide Traffic Control Device Inventory
An agreement has been executed with Darnell & Associates to inventory all the
existing traffic control devices including signs, striping barricades wheelchair ramps,
etc., and to identify possible deficiencies which may require upgrading. The
consultant is currently collecting data throughout the City. This project has been
funded by a grant provided by the Office Traffic Safety (OTS). All city streets have
been video taped and the sub consultant is currently is processing the data.
15, Traffic Signal at Rancho California and Cosmic Drives
Award of contract for this project is scheduled for the August 27, 1996 City Council
meeting. To expedite this project the city placed an order for the signal poles and
mastarms prior to award of the contract. The equipment is anticipated to be delivered
by the end of August and the signal should be in operation within the 45 working
days allocated for the construction period. This project includes installation of a fully
actuated 4-way traffic signal at this intersection.
16, City Maintenance Facilit@
A contract was awarded to Skytec, Inc. on July 23, 1996. The City is in receipt of
an executed contract along with the required bonding and insurance documents. A
pre-construction meeting will be scheduled for the third week of August with
construction anticipated to start the following week.
11.OUT TO BID:
1. City Wide Intelligent Traffic Manaaement System (ITMSI:
Data collection has been completed and the consultant has submitted a discussion
paper for the proposed improvements as well as various options on the available
hardware and software. Staff has reviewed the various alternatives and has finalized
the project scope. Currently, the consultant is preparing the construction plans for
r:\moactrptkcip%96\uQ.upd
Monthly Activity Report
August 27, 1996
Page 4
the installation of a communication system between the traffic signals. This project
will interconnect all major arterials and will coordinate traffic signals along the major
corridors in the City. Staff will be able to monitor the traffic from the new city hall
and make timing adjustments as necessary. This project has been funded by
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds which is a federal funding source
and is administered by Caltrans. Phases I of this project which includes installation
of conduits from the new city hall to Lyndie Lane has been advertised for bids and bid
opening date is September 12, 1996.
Ill. WORK IN DESIGN:
1. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modificatoons:
This project provides for the widening of the Rancho California Road bridge over the
1-15 freeway and construction of a northbound loop on-ramp. Caltrans is preparing
the Construction Cooperative Agreement which should be sent to the City for review
by the end of August, 1996. Roadway comments for the project were received
during the last week in June 1996 and the consultant is revising the roadway plans
for resubmittal and final approval. The project is schedule for bidding as soon as the
plans have been approved by Caltrans.
2. 1-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing lmprovemen=
Structural plans have been signed and approved by Caltrans Division of Structures.
Roadway plans were submitted to Caltrans (District 8) and final comments should be
received by Friday, August 23, 1996. Southern California Edison (SCE) will relocate
the 1 1 5 KVA power lines when the City decides to construct the project.
3. Margarita Community Park:
The plans and specifications were submitted for preliminary review and were returned
to the architect for revision. The City is presently involved in discussions with the
School District regarding inclusion of adjacent school property in the park
improvements. The project includes picnic areas, a tot play area, restroom facilities
and open turf areas. The development of two ball fields on the School Districts
property, two lighted tennis courts, and one lighted roller hockey facility will be bid
as add-alternates.
4. Traffic Signal at SR-79S and Bedfor Court
The preliminary plans have been prepared for installation of an interim 3-way traffic
signal at this intersection and have been submitted to Caltrans for review. The traffic
signal poles and mastarms on the north side of SR-79S at Bedford Court, will require
relocation upon widening of 79S by a project proposed by County Assessment
District (AD 1 59).
r:Vnoactrpt\c4p\86@.upd
Monthly Activity Report
August 27, 1996
Page 5
5. Traffic Sicinal at Mar(iarita Road & Solana Way
The preliminary plans for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection have been
completed. This project will utilize a portion of the existing traffic signal equipment
which is currently stock piled in the city yard.
6. FY95-96 Pavement Management System
The consultant has begun the design process and is expected to submit the first plan
check to the City by the end of August. This project will rehabilitate three streets,
which include Rancho Vista Road, Solana Way, and LaSerena Way.
r:Vnoactrp"cip%@S%aug.upd
LAND DEVELOPMENT
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
SPECIAL PROJECTS
JULY 1996
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Date:August 15, 1996
1. PW93-09 - Parkview Site*
The Record of Survey for the exchanged property and the vacation/dedication of
Pauba Road right-of-way are currently being prepared and processed.
2.PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor*
Themodifications to the interchange portion of the Assessment District 159 plans for
theconnection of the Western Bypass Corridor at Interstate 1 5/State Route 79 South
(1-1 5/SR79S) and the new alignment of Front Street at SR79S have been completed
and submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. Murietta Creek scour analysis has
been completed and it has been determined that a scour protection analysis is
necessary. The design of the Western Bypass Corridor Bridge will resume as soon as
the scour protection design has been completed.
3. PW95-08 - First Street Extensoons
The final design of the improvements are underway. Similar to Western Bypass
Corridor Bridge, the First Street Bridge design will resume as soon as the scour
protection design has been completed.
4. RFP #38 - 6th Street Parking Pr
The plans and specifications for the Sixth Street Parking Project including the public
restroom facilities and all of the associated onsite and public improvements, in
compliance with Old Town Specific Plan requirements, have been completed and the
project is advertised for public bid on July 29, 1996. Bid opening is scheduled for
August 15, 1996. The award of contract is scheduled to be presented before the
Redevelopment Agency on August 27, 1996 and construction should start in
September.
r:\moactrpt\dcv\96\July
co 0:
C)
z
co
T- crb
X
Co 0.
:3 Ui
0
CD co C4
94 C4 m -0
z w I-
z ui t-
E w CD CL
.0 -i co co cro c:; ei
C.) C,4 -0 w
CD v.
cn P- 4* C,4
E LU cn
cn co c:o w 0
o
z
17 W
U- CD 0 v- 0 co tz ci
F- v- C.)
cn e-
LU
LO ho 0
co C,4
0 cq w C,4
C.) co a)
4" CD 0 Ct
C,4 co C-7 914
LU co
CO Cl)
co to
0)
> CP 0 C4
v- 0 0
>;
co C4 ki 9 Co
ui w z m C,4 m cr)
L) a > 0 C,4 co t-
cl: o 40 10 cr c:;
0 D: 0 to
(.) CL F- F- C,4 C4 co
UJ 0. U) Cl)
40P Wo.
to
Cl)
z
0 Cl)
LLJ i- Z
z
o 0
I- w co
U. 0 I con a; co
M i- 0 LU
0. to co
M cn :ft m eq cn
co z -e -e
C4
to
co
z
4v- U) ILO #A
LU LU z 0 P- C4 a) Cl) W)
> P- C4 co
o tz ci
0 W E 0 a) 0 "t C4 m
L)M to
LU LL
LLJ 4* C,4
LU
U.
P-0 a;
C-4 -e co
0 CD v- !;
o LLI 0
z 0 P. C4 ui
M a) $0 @ cq
0 n C-4 co t- Cl) @ CD
o) Mr cr 16 V- C.)
10 co 4OW P-
0- C4 401, r4
pz ai co 4
CO CO 00 0
4c 94) C.)
a. z
U. z 0
0 2 M 2
z
z LU C6 5 0: I= T- C-4 0
z LLI Y. (i CL LU ui .0 Cl) 4)
w 0 IL W ui z
i- m 0 ui 781 'S
m CL LU 0 z g 0
@ (D x-j w i-
0 z z 0
i W 0
U) > ii r;
w U) C3 W I=
a.
CL w z >
LLI LU zz LA. w w - - -
a 9
0 w94 LLI IL m o C,4 r) V
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM:61@ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: August 1, 1996
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - July, 1996
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-
house personnel for the month of July, 1996:
1. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 15
B. Total signs installed 13
C. Total signs repaired 1
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 84
Ill. POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired 187
IV.CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 9
V.RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 245,483
VI.GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 2
B. Total S.F. 333
VII.STENCILING
A.274 new and repainted legends
B. 23,787 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
R:\ROAOS\ACTRPTN96\07.WPD rh
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - July, 1996
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 1 9 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 1 7 service order requests for the month of June, 1 996.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 103 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the following
0L.F. of new and repainted striping
0 L.F. of sand blasting
The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $0.00 compared to $0.00 for June, 1 996.
PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the following:
- 0- S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $4,280.99 for J,-
1996. 1
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of July, 1996 was
$20,140.00 compared to $24,380.00 for the month of June, 1996.
Account No. 5402 $20,140.00
Account No. 5401 0.00
Account No. 999-5402 0.00
cc:Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
R:\ROADS\.ACTRPT%96\07.WPD rh
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of July.
DATE STREET/CHANNE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST
-ACCOUNT @Z E
NELSON PAVING
07/03/96 Margarita Road East of Repaired tripping hazards on A.C. 576 S.F.
5402 Moraga sidewalk.
Total AC 8 Tons
Total Cost $1,500.00
DEL RIO CONTRACTORS:@
07/02/96 Old Town Pothole repairs, A.C. overlays and 15,000 S.F.
5402 A.C. remove and replace.
Total A.C. 1 00 Tons
Total Cost $12,990.00
BALDWIN WEED ABATEMENT
06/12/96 Citywide Right of way weed mowing.
5402
Total Cost $5,650.
Total Cost Account # 5402 $20,140.0(
R:kROADS%ACTRPn96\O7.V,IPD rh
Go co 0 CD Rt CD CD 0 CD C) C) CD in cl M ED
CD r- CC) 00 00 W CD Mw
Lr) co C) C'4
Lr) Lr;
(%i C4
Ce)
m
LLI
C/)
0
M
0 CD CD CD C)
c- -M Co
CD
m
U)0
C) 0 C) CD
0 C) CD
CD 0 C)
LU
LLJ
cn
cr)
C) CD C:)
cn
0
ui
ui >-
co co CD (D CD CD C:) C:) C) C) C) C:) CD CD Lr) m 0) CIO ce) 0) m CC)
CD r- 00 W M m CD - M
LC) to CV) C,4
in Lr;
C'4 C,4
EL
4) U- LL
E
tn a) U- C7 w
CD 0 C7
CIO :3 CO
Co z cu cco a-
U- -T
a)
U- a)
- r- tm
CD u- z -0
cn Cc CU z a> > w
r_r.= LU co
am) E 0
L z cu E cn E
z a)
a U) CL
0 0 CL E
'5 m (5
CD < co
a)U) CU
cu it 0
_j r- m I- a) CL
LU co 0 < F- -a U)
L)
w a) 0) CO
a- CL o 0- a) F-
fn U) 0 za 0 a") o Lu o w c, 0
o = a)
< < 0) U) I- F- F- i- a. (t u U) L) F"- EL< U)
co y 0 Lr) Cl) 0 0 Lf) 0 to 0 C4 0
F- It 0 CD 10 co 0 0) t- cn C4
< z U3 < C6 CS Lli C5 vi ci ci C6
C) 0 0 U) LU LC) CO Lr) - a) 0) (n LC)
CD r-i co r_ 0) co Lr)
t- CrT V7 06 @ C4 Cd
< < a) r- 69 69
o L) fie to 69
0u- U)
0 C:) C) C:) 0 Lr) C:) a) r-4 CD C:) r4
0 C:) 0) 0 C4 Ln Cl) C) C) cn
>, 6 Lci
< 'o
o Lu to to m Ln m LO C) m CN be (D
m >. r- CN co CN te co cn
.u co to 6% to to
.0 'a CN CD
:3 Q) < x < to IA to
U) cu 0 u to
wrL LL. cn
0
F- LL.
U) (L
cr. LLI
0
LL-
0 a.
LLI
LLI LU
i-
LL,
0a. i LLJ
0 Lu
u U)
I= i-
0 tn
LL
U)
0 <
L)
ui
o
O LLI 0: ui
-i
0 CL
LLi Z n m
ix < p- 0 <
co z 0,
LLJ (m
> Z(6
LL - C:) 0 C:) C) 0 LC) 0 CD CN 0
-< 0) C) 0 0 0 0 a) 0 C,4 U') Cl) C:) 0 (1)
0 L) c:i (=i C=i C=i Lfi (=i cli
< 0) te to a) Lr) Cl) to C> CY)
Z 0 r- C4 CD C,4 to Cl) tn CD
LL, LL. b9
LU -i F- (6
LLJ cn
cc 0
Z F- L)
< 0 cn
CL :E
LLI co co C) C) CD Lr) cn Cl) 0) a) Cl) Cl)
r- 0 r- - - m co co
w C4 Cl) Ir
LLI >-
C,4
0
L)
0) U) 7c 4D VI L: L:
0)
tm 0 0 tm
m 0 m .0 .0 co 0
i m - U LU
0 0 0 z
0 0 0
U- of LL U- < C/)
ui u z w u
P- !! CL LU -i LU U) z
m m (.D u LLI LU
ix 0 m =) 0 ui
C7 CT ul -i tr U) 0
It U) 0) ui 0) -i LLJ -i ui
U. LL LU -i
0 < < E
cy
LU < P- ui LU z cn u M
CL LLI z u < LU LLJ cn Ch
= LU 0
L) < < u m LLJ
u < LL 0
a. p-
W LU w LLJ
(D LLI
z i:
< z <
<
i-L 0 (n U. z 0 > Lu <
iL LU z z 6 P-
(n 0 (!) LL 0
p- US
< cn U) - ui
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07-08-96 Ridge Park Drive @ N.D.C. Removed 328 S.F.
07-11-96 La Primavera @ Colina Verde Removed 5 S. F. of Graffiti
TOTAL -2
LOCATIONS
333
TOTAL
S.F.
pwO3 %roads\wkc mpltd\96%08. Graffiti 080196
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07-01-96 Area #1 Abated 30,000 S.F.R.O.W. Weeds
07-01-96 Old Town Abated 15,200 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-02-96 Area #1 Abated 20,000 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-03-96 Diaz @ Winchester Abated 1,000 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-09-96 Area #1 Abated 30,000 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-10-96 Margarita between Abated 14,200 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
Rancho Vista and Pauba
07-10-96 Area #1 Abated 1,450 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-11-96 Area #1 Abated 200 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-11-96 Area #2 Abated 11,850 S. F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-15-96 Area #2 Abated 3,500 S. F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-16-96 Area #2 Abated 43,281 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-17-9 Area #2 Abated 31,216 S. P. R.O.W. Weeds@
07-18-96 Area #2 Abated 11,500 S.F. R. O.W. Weeds
07-23-96 Area #2 Abated 886 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-24-96 Area #2 Abated 28,700 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
07-31-96 Via Lobo Channel Abated 2,500 S.F. R.O.W. Weeds
TOTAL S.F. 245,483
R.O.W. WEED
ABATED
pwO3\i-oads'@wkcinpltd"96\07.Weeds 080696
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
LOCATION REQUEST PLETE
DATE I I 11 WORK COM
07-02-96 40680 Carmelita Circle Tree trimming 07-02-06
07-02-96 Rancho California Road Potholes 07-02-96
@ Front Street
07-02-96 42963 Agena Root prune 07-02-96
07-03-96 Rancho California Road Pothole 07-03-96
@ Margarita
7-03-96 30399 Calle Sonora Pothole 07-03-96
07-09-96 41 531 Ave. De la Reina Tree trimming 07-09-96
07-10-96 Rancho California Road Pothole 07-10-96
07-11-96 421 63 Rubicon Circle Sweeper concern 07-11-96
07-11-96 0365 Calle Halcon Standing water 07-11-96
07-1 5-96 El Domino Street Skate board ramp pick up 07-15-96
07-1 5-96 31 806 Corte Rosario Debris in Street 07-15-96
07-15-96 N. General Kearney Construction work station 07-15-96
@ Cross Creek @ 5:45 a.m.
07-15-96 Via Montezuma @ Landscape Water Leaking 07-15-96
Community Center
07-17-96 Camino San Jose Tr 07-17-nr_
ash concern ou
07-18-96 40600 Carmelita Circle Tree dying 07-18-96
07-24-96 Rancho Vista Litter 07-24-96
07-24-96 Walcott Grading 07-24-96
07-26-96 29895 Corte Castille Tree trimming 07-29-96
07-29-96 31812 Poole Court Litter 07-29-96
TOTAL SOR'S
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\96\07.svsrq 080696
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
SIGNS
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07-05-96 La Primavera @ Pauba Replaced R-1 'Graffiti'
07-05-96 Rancho California Road @ Replaced "Bus Stop Sign' T.C.
Hope Drive
07-08-96 Ynez Road @ County Center Replaced R-1 'Missing'
07-08-96 Black Deer Loop Replaced R-1 "Faded"
07-11-96 Winchester Creek @ Replaced R-1 "Graffiti"
Winchester
07-16-96 Bike Trail Installed 6 Trail Signs
07-16-96 Via Norte @ Calle Pina Colada Installed W-80 'Stolen"
07-16-96 Via Norte 250 Feet Installed W-80 "Stolen"
E/O Calle Pina Colada
07-22-9 Winchester W/O Jefferson Replaced R-7 & R-7A "T.C."
07-22-96 Rancho California Road @ Replaced R- 1 -2 "T. C."
Front Street
07-22-96 Pala Road N/0 Bridge Replaced W-5 & W-6 "25" ,T.C."
07-22-96 Del Rey Road @ Del Rey -Replaced W-9 "T.C."
07-23-96 Creative @ Stonegate Replaced R-1 "Graffiti"
07-23-96 End of Rustic Glen Replaced R-2 "30" "Stolen"
07-26-06 Paseo del Cielo Installed 3 "Neighborhood Watch Signs"
07-26-96 Paseo Sereno @ Via Norte Replaced R-1 "T.C."
07-29-96 Main Street @ Pujol Replaced R - 1 4'T. C. 11
07-30-96 Margarita @ Rustic Glen Installed Detour Sign
07-31-96 Margarita @ N. Gen. Kearney Installed G-9
TOTAL 15
SIGNS
REPLACED
TOTAL 13
SIGNS
INSTALLED
PWO3\ROADS@'KCMPLTD\96\07.SIGNIJNSTALL 080596
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
STENCILING
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07-03-96 Old Town Repainted 22 Legends
07-03-96 Old Town Repainted 760 L.F. Red Curb
07-15-96 Area #1,2 (See Daily for Locations) Repanted 46 Legends
07-16-96 Area #3 (See Daily for Locations) Repainted 58 Legends
07-17-96 Area #1,2 (See Daily for Locations) Repainted 25 Legends
07-17-96 Area #1,2 (See Daily for Locations) Repainted 305 L.F. Yellow Curb
07-18-96 Area #2,3 (See Daily for Locations) Repainted 83 Legends
07-22-96 Butterfield Stage Road Repainted 10 Legends
07-23-96 Ynez between Repainted 6 Legends
Rancho California Road and
Santiago
07-24-96 Rancho California Road between Repainted 9 Legends
Moraga and Margarita
07-25-96 Nicolas Road between Repainted 15 Legends
Joseph Road and Hwy. 79N
07-25-96 Area #2 Repainted 3,952 L.F. of Red Curb
9-96 Area #1 & #2 Repainted 10,000 L.F. of Red Curb
0-96 Area #2, #3 & #4 Repainted 5,175 L.F. of Red Curb
07-31-96 Area #3 & #4 Repainted 3,585 L.F. of Red Curb
New & Repainted 274
Legends
L.F. of Red Curb
New & Repainted 7 7
PWO3\ROADS\V.rKCMPLTD\96\07.STENCIL 080696
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
JULY,1996
R.O. W. TREE TRIMMING
WORK COMPLETED
DATE@ @LOCATION
07-01-96 Area #1 Trimmed 13 Trees
07-09-96 Area #1 Trimmed 9 Trees
07-11-96 Area #1 Trimmed 3 Trees
07-16-96 Area #2 Trimmed 1 Trees
07-17-96 Area #2 Trimmed 12 Trees
07-18-96 Area #2 Trimmed 9 Trees
07-25-96 Nicholas Road between Roripaugh Trimmed 29 Trees
and Via Lobo
07-31-96 Nicholas Road between Roripaugh Trimmed 8 Trees
and Via Lobo
TOTAL TREES 84
TRIMMED
pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd%96\07.7M 08059f
DMG
Proposal to Evaluate
library Service Alternatives
TEMECUIA- A
LIBRARYTA,SKFORCE
David AL Griffith & Associates July 26, 1996
Cupertino, Calffomia
DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Professional Services for the Public Sector
20111 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 145
Cupertino, California 95014
406-366-0260 FAX 408-366-0263
DMG
July 11, 1996
Allie Kuhns
Senior Management Analyst
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA. 92590
Dear Ms. Kuhns:
David M. Griffith & Associates is pleased to present our proposal to
conduct a study of library service delivery alternatives for the Temecula -
Murrieta Library Task Force. We believe we bring a uniquely qualified
team to this project. More specifically:
Within the last year, the proposed team has conducted two
major evaluations of library service delivery systems. These
projects, which analyzed library services in Contra Costa and
Orange Counties in California, have each involved complex
evaluations of library service levels, financing, management
and operations, and governance issues associated with county-
wide library systems serving a wide diversity of communities
and library users.
Our team blends senior professional analysts and library
service professionals to provide the perspective of both the
professional evaluator and library service practitioner as the
operations and services of the Library System are reviewed.
The proposal which follows is organized in three sections. It opens
with an introduction to the firm and our project team; follows with an
overview of how we would approach the project; and concludes with our
estimate of project cost.
1BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR FIRM AND
PROPOSED PROJECT TEARYL
David M. Griffith & Associates was established nearly 20 years ago,
and in the intervening years, has grown to be the largest consulting fi= in
the United States which specializes in serving public sector clients. We
maintain a national network of 35 offices. Our client base includes more
than 2,000 city, county, and state government clients from every region of
the United States. In the Western United States, we serve our clients from
offices located in Cupertino, Carmichael, and Pasadena California.
e@.
IDavid M. I Griffith & Associatet.-@..-
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Initially established to provide financial consulting services to
clients, the Firm's capabilities have been expanded to include executive
recruitment and management and operations analysis. The table which
follows shows illustrative assignments and clients which demonstrate our
experience in providing management and operations analysis services to
local government clients across the United States.
Client Name Nature of Our Work
City of Anaheim, CA Utilities Department Management Audit
Evaluation of Inspection Services
City of Beverly Hills, CA Public Works Privatization Study.
Recreation and Parks Strategic Plan
City of Campbell,CA Management audit of Public Works
City of Carlsbad,CA Feasibility of Merging Water District w/city
City of Chicago, IL Management audit of the Water Department
City-wide Benchmarking Study
City of Concord, CA Management audit of Engineering
Service and Financial Evaluation of
Community Center
Contra Costa County, CA County-Wide Library Services Study
Management Audit of Corrections
City of El Cajon, CA Management Audit of Police Department
City of Escondido, CA 20 Year Services Plan
Including Library Services
Mana-ement Audits of Police and Utilities
City of Glendale, CA Management Audit of Police Department
City of Hayward, CA Management Audits of Building.and Engineering
City of Hartford, CN Library Staff Scheduling Study
Kern County, CA Management Audit of Sheriffs Department
Management Audit of Planning
Kings County, CA Countywide Manacement Audit
City of Laguna Hills, CA Library Feasibility Study
City of Lon- Beach, CA Communications Consolidation
C)
Manacrement Studies of Towing and Fleet Services
City of Los Angeles, CA
Marin Municipal Water DistricL CA
City of Milwaukee, WI
City-wide Benchmarking Study
Contracting Out Assistance
Grand Jury Management Audits
Districtwide Management Audit
Mana-ement Audit of Public Works
I?
City of Moreno Valley, CA Library Financial Feasibility Study
Feasibility Studies for Police
and Fire Services
City of Mountain View, CA Management Audit - Police Department
apa County, CA Management Audit of Probation Department
City of National City, CA Mgmt. Audit of the Police Department
idavid M. Griffith & Associates
Page,21.""@l
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Client Name Nature of Our Work
State of Nevada - DET&R Redesign Administrative Functions
Long Range Visioning & Strategic Planning
City of Newark, CA City-wide Management Audit
City of Newport Beach, CA Management Audit of Risk Management
City of Novato, CA Management Audit of Community Development
City of Oceanside, CAManagement Audits of Police, Finance, and Utilities
City of 0-den, UTManagement Audit of Police Department
City of Orange, CAManagement Audit of Library
Orange County, CACounty-wide Library Services Study
Management Audit of Animal Control
City of Oxnard, CA Management audit of Community Development
City of Palo Alto, CA Citywide Management Audit Including Library
City of Pasadena, CA
City of Poway, CA
City of Richmond, CA
City of Riverside, CA,
City of San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino County, CA
City of San Buenaventura, CA
City of San Clemente, CA
San Diego County
Management Audits of Six Departments
Citywide Management Audit
Management Audit of Parks
and Library Departments
Management Audit of Planning and Building
Management Audit of Police Department.
Grand Jury Management Audits
Management study of Public Works
Citywide Management Audit
Management Audits of Planning Department
City of San Jose, CAManacrement Audits of Police and Airport Departments
TQM Study of Neighborhood Services
Various Police studies
911 Implementation
Fire Master Plan
City of San Luis Obispo, CA Management study of Parks, Planning, and
Public Works Departments
City of San Mateo, CA Management Audit of the Library
San Mateo County Management Audit of Planning
City of San Rafael, CA Citywide Management Audit
Santa Clara County, CA Management Audit of Justice Agencies
City of Santa Clarita, CA Feasibility studies of Fire and Waste Water
City of Santa Monica, CA Management Audit of the Parking Enforcement
Program.
Shasta County, CA Management Audits of Probation and
Sheriffs Departments
Solano County, CA Countywide Management Audit
Health and Welfare Department Organization Study
City of South Pasadena, CA Citywide Management Audit
Including Library
City of Tustin, CA Management studies of Fire and Public Works
City of Visalia, CA Management Audit of the Fire Department
City of W. Sacramento, CA Mana ement Audit of Police Department
City of Whittier, CA Management Audit of Fleet Services
Our Western Region management analysis group, which is
headquartered in Cupertino, California, is comprised of senior analysts
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates Page -3,'.-.1
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
who have extensive consulting and management experience in virtually all
aspects of local government services and operations. Rather than provide
lengthy lists of the firm's clients and previous projects, we believe that the
individual experience of the members of our proposed project team is most
relevant.
DMG believes that the personnel assigned to the project are the single
most significant factor in producing a quality product. We propose a team
which would be staffed and structured to provide the following:
Senior staff in all project roles.
A project team which has extensive experience in:
Conducting management and operations studies
of virtually every local government service area
including library services.
Managing and operating individual city library
and multi-jurisdictional library service systems
which focus on the feasibility of library service
delivery alternatives.
Current experience in analyzing library services
including governance, financing, and service
delivery as a result of our major library services
studies for Orange County and the member cities
of the'Orange County Public Library system, and
Contra Costa County and the member cities of the
Contra Costa County Public Library system.
The project team would consist of the following people.
John W. Heiss would serve as project manager and lead
analyst. Over the 25 years of his consulting career, Mr.
Heiss has managed and completed over 500 management
audits and evaluations of local government services. He is
the project manager of our current library services study
for Contra Costa County, and previously was project
manager and lead analyst on our library services study for
Orange County. Prior to joining DMG, Mr. Heiss was one
of the founding partners of Hughes, Heiss & Associates.
Beverley Simmons is a senior library service professional
with extensive operating and consulting experience gained
from over 20 years experience in the library service area.
She would assist the project team in evaluating service
levels and projecting staffing, facilities, and other
requirements for each service delivery alternative. Her
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates
Pak e-4
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
experience includes serving as Project Director for the
California Library Restructuring Project; Director of
Libraries for the City of Sunnyvale as well as two cities in
Massachusetts; and as a library services consultant for the
states of Massachusetts and North Carolina. She has been
a key member of the DMG project teams on the Orange
County and Contra Costa County Library studies.
Jacquelyn Harbert is a Manager with DMG and has 18
years experience in consulting to and working with public
sector agencies. Her role on the project would be to assist
with cost and revenue analysis associated with each of the
alternatives structured and evaluated. Ms. Harbert has
played a major role in our analysis of library services for
Contra Costa County including developing compensation
plans and costs for alternative library service
configurations. Her other consulting experience includes
more than 20 management and operations reviews covering
a wide variety of city and county government functions
including police, health and welfare, administrative
services, and personnel management policies and systems.
Greg Tananbaum is a consultant with DMG and is
currently working on our Contra Costa County project to
assist the team with collection of service level, system use,
and financial information. He previously played a major
data collection role on our Orange County Library Study.
He would play a similar role on this project. Mr.
Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
from the London School of Economics.
More detailed and extensive resumes of each proposed member of
our project team are provided as attachments at the end of this proposal.
Listed below are references you can contact to get their reactions
to the quality and practicality of our consulting work. They include
people with direct experience in working with us on major library
studies.
John Adams
County Librarian
County of Orange, CA
(714) 566-3040
library Systems and ServiLces Study
System-wide analysis of all aspects of library services for Orange
County and member jurisdiction of the County Library System. Included
evaluation of service levels and costs; projection of service costs to provide
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
alternative service levels; and feasibility analysis of alternative approaches
for organizing and delivering library services. This included elimination of
the County system and establishment of individual city libraries; regional
service groupings; and alternative governance and administrative
configurations for a County-wide system. Each alternative included
development of service, staffing, and operating plans including
requirements for provision of technical and support services.
Ann Marie Gold
County librarian
County of Contra Costa, CA
(510) 646-6423
library Systems and Services Study
Current project being conducted for Contra Costa County and the 18
cities which are currently served by the County library system. Focus of the
study is to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the system; identify service
and cost issues from the perspective of each participating jurisdiction; and
develop and evaluate alternative organizational, operating, and financial
approaches for resolving identified issues. Like the Orange County project,
this study is addressing governance and fiscal issues related to the delivery
of library services and will structure and evaluate individual city and
regional service delivery alternatives to the current County-wide system.
Dan White
Assistant City Manager
City of Lag-una Hil[Is, CA
(714) 707-2620
Lib@ Feasibility Study
Project which evaluated the feasibility of the City of Laguna Hills
establishing a city library. Included conduct of community focus groups to
develop consensus targets for library services; evaluation of current service
levels provided to Laguna Hills by the County library system compared to
community expectations; and preliminary analysis of costs associated with
developing and operating a stand-alone city library.
We would be pleased to provide additional references upon request.
The next section provides a description of how we would conduct the
study.
2.OLTR APPROACH TO THE PROJECT.
The section which follows describes the tasks we would accomplish to
structure ands evaluate library service delivery alternatives for Temecula
IDavid M. Griffith & Associates
6,
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delive@v Alternatives
and Murrieta. The section concludes with a proposed project work
schedule.
Based on review of your letter of July 10, 1996, and my previous
discussion with you, I understand that Temecula and Murrieta have
formed a Joint Library Task Force to address service delivery issues and
begin to explore alternatives. We have assumed that this group would form
the basis for a Project Steering Committee. The proposed work plan which
follows describes when we would meet with the Project Steering Committee
and outlines the types of products we would submit to the Project Steering
Committee for review and discussion.
Task 1 --Meet with the Project Steering Committee and Identify Major
labrary Service Delivery and Funding Issues.
Beforeembarking on an analysis which structures and evaluates
governance, operational, and financing alternatives, it is important that
the project team understand the library service issues impacting Murrieta
and Temecula, and reach closure on issues and expectations related to the
project. As a result, we propose that the first task of the project involve the
following work steps:
0Meet with Riverside County Library Director, and key
management staff from Temecula and Murrieta to fully
understand current issues associated with the County Library
System including financial status, service level issues, and
service attitudes and expectations in Temecula and Murrieta.
0Hold a half-day to full-day workshop with the Project Steering
Committee and address the following:
-Consensus or significant views on service issues and service
level expectations and assumptions which need to be
incorporated into the analysis. For example, should the
analysis focus on enhancement of services, restoration of lost
services, or some mixture of the two?
-Are there service delivery and organizational approaches
which are not feasible and should be rejected from the study?
The product of this first task would be a detailed issue list which will
provide the basis for subsequent analytical activities.
PO&
[David M-. Griffith & Associates.',' :"@
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Task 2 - Determine Participating Jurisdictions'Attitudes Toward
Service, Organizational, and Financing Alternatives, and
Prepare Criteria Which Can Be Employed to Evaluate library
Service Delivery, Financing, and Governance Alternatives.
While we recognize that the Project Steering Committee will provide
input from the service recipient perspective, we also believe that it is critical
that early in the study we conduct interviews with all elected and key
appointed officials from Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore to
determine attitudes toward alternatives, service levels, and city willingness
and financial capability to deliver library services under alternative
scenarios. It will also be important to identify Riverside County attitudes
toward potential withdrawal of the cities from the County Library system.
As a result, in this second task, we will:
0Conduct interviews with the County Administrator and each city
manager from the participating cities.
oThese interviews will explore the following areas:
-City attitudes toward current library services including service
hours, facility location, service scope, and system
responsiveness to city needs.
-Interest in and reaction to alternative organizational forms for
delivering library services as preliminarily identified in
completing Task 1.
-Preliminary reaction to city financial participation in the
delivery of library services.
-County positions on withdrawal from the County Library
system including transfer of library service related property
tax revenues.
0Hold workshops with each participating city council to solicit
input on service levels, facility adequacy, and other relevant
issues. A member of our project team will meet with and facilitate
a one to two hour workshop with each group, summarize results,
provide the summary of those results for review by each group to
ensure accuracy, and based on written comments provided by
each group, modify summaries of attitudes and opinions as
appropriate.
0Based on the results of these meetings, we will develop a proposed
set of criteria which can be employed to evaluate specific
alternatives which will be developed in subsequent study work
tasks.
idavid M. Griffith & Associates Pag@'8
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
Finally, we will complement the evaluation criteria and interview
results with a set of proposed measures which can be employed to
structure alternatives over the next stages of the project. These
will include such measures as the following and will include
proposed service levels to address issues and expectations
identified during workshops and interviews. They can be
expected to include:
-Facility availability to users from the perspective of location
and size.
-Collection replacement and enhancement rates.
-Collection scope in the context of service area population.
-Capability to meet future demands for both traditional and
non-traditional library services.
-Potential for development and sharing of specialized
collections.
-"Return to Source" equity in terms of revenues generated to
support library services and cost and value of services received.
-Others, as appropriate.
Once workshops and interviews have been completed and criteria
and proposed performance measures developed, we will summarize results
in the form of a progress report which will clearly identify issues and
expectations by member jurisdiction and present and review the report with
the project steering committee.
Task 3 --Develop the Data Base Necessary to Support Structure and
Evaluation of Library Service Delivery Alternatives by
Developing a Detailed Profile of the Current Operations,
Service Levels, Costs, and Revenues of the Riverside County
Library System as They Relate to Temecula, Murrieta, and
Lake Elsinore and Surrounding Unincorporated Areas.
Thepurpose of this third task will be to collect, summarize, and
analyze financial and operating data necessary to structure and evaluate
service alternatives including estimating costs of service restorations. This
will include the following work steps:
Document how the Riverside County Public Library System is
organized, staffed, and financed to include:
- Structure, staffing, role, and cost of central support and
administrative service units including such services as
idavid M. Griffith & Associates
Pag@-91
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
new materials processing, central reference services,
and which services are provided at the
Central level versus those provided by the local branches
serving Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore, as well
as any other current library facilities which are related
to services delivered in the area.
- Nature and capabilities of automated systems currently
in place to handle circulation management, data base
access, and other library operating and service
requirements.
- Current staffing, service hours, and operating costs of
all branch libraries which relate to the Temecula,
Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore area.
- Location, service area, and basic characteristics of all
library facilities related to the area including:
Size and configuration.
Collections including type, scope and content, and
size.
Current utilization data as measured by
circulation and other available measures.
Facility ownership.
- Current expenditures for collection development and
replacement.
0Nature and scope of current volunteer programs including
level of volunteer efforts by program and facility.
0Current financial structure related to delivery of library
services in the participating communities including:
-Assessed valuation, property tax apportionment rate for
library services, and library service related property tax
revenue generated by city and the neighboring
unincorporated area.
-Other revenue sources generated based on existing
operations including fee for service and other user
related revenues, grants and subventions available to
public library systems, and the like.
idavid M. Griffith & Associates P@dz-lo
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
-Any city contributions to enhance services above base
levels provided and funded by the County system.
-Existence and level of fees or funds (e.g. developer fees,
Mello-Roos Districts, etc.) currently established to provide
support for library facilities in the participating
communities or through the County Library system.
This would include current balances; projected growth in
future years; and basic nature of current fees.
ùOther factors related to projecting costs of alternative
structures and service approaches such as:
-Any library service related debt not yet retired including
amount, debt service schedules, and capital retirement
and interest costs.
-Deferred maintenance and capital improvements
associated with library facilities by facility and estimated
cost.
-Any other significant deferred costs.
0Any current plans to replace, expand, or enhance library
facilities by either the County or the participating cities
including nature, projected timing, and plans to finance
any capital improvement projects.
The results of this task would be documented in the form of another
progress report which would be reviewed with Riverside County Library
staff to ensure accuracy. Once corrected and completed, the progress
report would be provided to the Project Steering Committee for
informational purposes and would be employed by the project team as the
detailed data base for the subsequent development and evaluation of service
deliveryalternatives.
Task 4 -Benchmark Current Service Levels and Operations Against
Other IAbraries'Services.
Theprincipal focus of Task 4 will be to place current library services
and operations provided to Temecula, Marietta, and Lake Elsinore in the
context of library service levels in similar communities elsewhere in
California. This comparison will focus on cities which operate their own
libraries. Specific work steps will include:
Developing a proposed panel of other city libraries to employ for
comparative purposes. The panel will be selected based on such
factors as service area population and composition; service area
size; and number and type of facilities operated. Once the
IDavid M. Griffith& Associates
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
proposed benchmark panel has been developed, we will review the
proposed comparative systems with the Project Steering
Committee and add or delete benchmark candidates as
appropriate based on that review. We expect that at least 15
comparative libraries should be surveyed to provide a meaningful
comparative data base.
0Then define benchmark criteria and collect comparative data. We
would expect to employ those comparative indicators as:
-Public service hours by facility.
-Type of access to automated services and data bases provided by
the libraries surveyed.
-Collections, facility size, expenditures, and other appropriate
measures compared on a per capita basis.
ùConduct the survey and develop detailed comparisons between
and among services currently provided in Temecula, Murrieta,
and Lake Elsinore and the panel libraries surveyed.
The results of the benchmark survey will be documented in progress
report form and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee. Once the
review has been completed, the results of this task will be combined with
the results of the previous tasks to support a detailed analysis of current
operations and services in the next task. It will also provide the basis for
proposing specific service level criteria which can be employed to structure
and evaluate the alternatives in the next task.
Task 5 --Structure and Evaluate Alternative Approaches for
Organizing, Governing, and Financing Library Services in the
Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore Area.
Thepurpose of this fifth task will be to conduct a preliminary
assessment of the potential alternatives for organizing, delivering, and
financing library services consistent with your Request for Proposal. Major
work steps would be as follows:
0Review the results of the preceding work steps including
the initial work shops with the Project Steering Committee
in Task 1, and the elected official workshops and city
manager interviews in Task 2, and develop a list of the most
feasible models to be evaluated. This list could be expected
to include those outlined in the RFP, supplemented and
refined based on the analysis completed to this point.
0Develop preliminary Rro-forma operating and revenue budgets
for each alternative from two perspectives: (1) Continuation of
idavid M. Griffith & Associates Page@,,.-12@-"
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
existing service levels; and (2) Increase of service levels, either
to levels identified as targets through initial meetings with the
Project Steering Committee and elected official workshops and
interviews with the city managers in Task 2, and the results of
the benchmark survey.
-This would include development of proposed staffing plans
to provide services under each alternative including direct
public service and to provide the basic support services
needed to operate a library including collection materials
management, maintenance and processing; automated
systems, and the like. This would include exploration of the
potential for any of the locally controlled alternatives to
contract with the County Library system for some or all
support services including circulation/automated systems
and collection management support services.
-Other annual expenditures necessary to provide service
including collection replacement/enhancement; data base
and information network access; and the like.
-Any major start-up costs associated with the alternatives
such as:
Facility modifications) required to accommodate any
additional public service needs as well as administrative
and support functions associated with alternatives.
Need to acquire and install automated systems
(circulation and data base access capabilities) associated
with the alternative.
Need to expand and enhance collections to function as a
stand-alone or joint library system outside of the current
County system. This would include the potential need to
upgrade locally available reference and specialized
collections to meet service needs.
The analysis would include identification of property tax
transfers associated with each alternative as well as other
revenues which could expect to be generated given information
collected and analyzed in Task 3. The analysis would identify
any cost-revenue gaps associated with each alternative, or
excess revenues available to enhance services above current
levels, both in total and from the perspective of each of the
participating jurisdictions.
Evaluate each alternative in the context of the evaluation
criteria developed in completing Task 2 and compare each in
idavid M. Griffith & Associates P@e -13
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
the context of the performance measures developed in that
task.
Once the evaluation has been completed, the alternative analysis and
evaluation will be documented in a major progress report which will be
presented to and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee. The
purpose of this major progress meeting would be to thoroughly review the
content, advantages, and disadvantages of each of the alternatives and
select those for refinement and additional analysis over the remaining
tasks of the study.
Task 6 --Refine the Most Feasible Alternatives Including Identification
of the Steps Necessary to ]implement Each and Projection of the
Financial Performance of Each.
Completion of Task 5 will have resulted in selection of those
alternatives which best fulfill governance, cost, revenue, and service
delivery objectives. In this task, the three highest rated alternatives will be
further refined by addressing the following issues:
0Determining how to implement the asset transfers which may
be required by one or more alternatives. This includes
facilities, collections, equipment, and other assets, as
appropriate.
0Refinement of any capital or other start-up costs associated
with each alternative including resolution of deferred
maintenance and capital improvement needs associated with
library facilities.
0Combine the above into detailed pro-forma start-up/transition
and operating budgets for each alternative, by year, for a five to
ten year period following implementation. This analysis needs
to incorporate the impact of population growth projected for
this rapidly growing area on service demand, costs, and
revenues in future years.
0Compare projected costs and revenue for the ten year period
and determine the scope of any cost-revenue gaps or excess
revenues available to invest in enhanced services associated
with each alternative. As appropriate, identify approaches for
filling any gaps. which are result from each alternative (e.g.
parcel assessment; fees for service; city general fund
contribution) and calculate amounts (both in total and in terms
of impact on service users, residents, and property owners)
needed to close the gap and meet target service levels.
Conversely, identify how excess revenues, if any, can be
invested in enhanced services and compare to the current
service delivery system.
IDavid M.,Griffith, & Associates Pdte.,147--
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
IDelivery Alternatives
0Then, identify the legal steps necessary to implement each
alternative approach.
0Finally, identify any other transition issues associated with
implementing each alternative and evaluate steps required to
resolve each.
This task would involve preparation of a major progress report which
would include the analysis noted above. The report would be presented to
and reviewed with the Project Steering Committee in a major progress
meeting. Based on the results of that meeting, some alternatives may be
rejected as impractical from the cost, political, or legal perspective. The
meeting may also require additional analysis and/or clarification of all or
some alternatives. That analysis would be completed in the final work task
as describedbelow.
Task 7 -Recommend the Most Effective Alternatives and Prepare the
F'inal ReporL
This seventh work task will involve:
ùRefining the alternatives analysis based on the results of the
progress meeting at the end of Task 6. This would include
refining cost and revenue projections, as necessary, and
expanding implementation plans for all or selected alternatives
identified by the committees.
0Based on our analysis, recommending the alternatives which
we believe present the best long term options for Temecula and
the other jurisdictions
0Documenting the results of each of the previous progress
reports into the project final report.
Once the final draft has been reviewed by the Committee, it will be
produced in final form. We are prepared to present the final report as you
deem appropriate. Our work plan and cost estimate is predicated on
presenting the final report to the following groups:
The Project Steering Committee.
A joint meeting of the participating City Councils.
The chart which follows this page shows our estimate of the time
required to accomplish each of the tasks described in this section. As can
IDavid M. Griffith &Associates, Page'.15@l
cu @
cn
CZ
rn
m
CZ S. CD
Cd CZ Lt > CL)
> a)
co (D .0 LV
CD 9.
cu
lz
Cd w
CD
S.
CZ C3
CD
0 C6 rn .4 6 C6
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
be seen from review of the proposed schedule, we estimate 13 weeks would
be required to complete the project as described in this proposal.
3.PROJECTCOST.
The table which follows below shows our estimate of the professional
staff time required to complete the project as described in Section 2 of this
proposal.
Project Task Person Hours
1. Initial meetings and issue identification. 16
2.Determine participating jurisdictions' attitudes toward
service issues and alternatives. 32
3.Profile current library operations, service levels, costs
and revenues. 64
4. Benchmark library services, costs, and revenues. 32
5.Structure and evaluate alternatives for delivering
library services. 96
6.Refine alternatives and develop detailed cost and
revenue projections. 88
7. Prepare and present final report. 40
Project Total 3ffl
The table which follows shows our estimate of project costs associated
with the level of effort noted above.
Professional Staff Time 0
Project Team Member Rate per Hmw Person Hours cost
John W. Heiss $150 96 $ 14,ZT
Jacquelyn Harbert $100 112 11,200
Beverley Simmons $100 80 8,000
Greg Tananbaum 1 $7 80 1 5,6001
SLTIB-TOTAL 36B $39,200
Project Expense
Travel $ 1,500
Subsistence 1,000
Report Production and
Communications 500
SUB-TOTAL $3,0001
PROJECT TOTAL
We would be pleased to conduct the project for a fixed price contract of
$ 42,200.
idavid M. Griffith & Associates Page -'I 17
Proposal to Evaluate Library Service
Delivery Alternatives
We appreciate the opportunity to present our proposal. The
attachment to this letter provides more detailed resumes of each member of
our project team. We have previously provided you with a copy of our
Orange County Library Study as a work sample.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (408) 366 - 0260.
Sincerely Yours,
John W. Heiss
Director
IDavidM.Griffith&Associates--@-,
Page@,
Project Team Resumes
GREG TANANBAUM
Mr. Tananbaum will serve as
a Project Analyst
Mr. Tananbaumis a consultant with David M. Griffith &
Associates. He has been with the firm for over one year. Previously, he
worked in Australia as a private school instructor, specializing in courses
in government.
Since joining DMG, Mr. Tananbaum has participated in an
operating and financial evaluation of the Centre Concord. His
responsibilities included documenting and evaluating the competitive
market in which the Centre currently operates, and developing alternative
marketing strategies for the Centre. He also worked on a management
audit of the Mountain View Police Department during which he assisted
Mr. Heiss in the evaluation of field patrol staffing and service levels. He
played a major role on our Orange County Library during which his project
responsibilities included data collection and cost analysis of current and
projected library operations.
He is currently a member of our project team for the Contra Costa
County library services study. His responsibilities focus on data collection
in support of other team members. This includes detailed analysis of
branch library usage patterns, system operating costs and cost estimates
for service delivery/governance alternatives, and revenue analysis for each
of the various service delivery alternatives being developed by the project
team.
Mr. Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
Degree from the London School of Economics.
David M. Griffith &@ Associates
PROJECRTEAM
RESUIMES
Project Team Resumes
JOHN W. HEISS
Mr. Heiss will serve as
Project Manager and Lead
Analyst
Mr. Heiss is the National Director for Operations Improvement
for David M. Griffith & Associates and has been a consultant to local
government for more than 25 years. He was previously one of the founding
partners of Hughes, Heiss & Associates and earlier in his consulting
career, was a Project Manager with the international management
consulting firm of Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
Over the course of his consulting career Mr. Heiss has completed
over 500 consulting projects including a number of library service analyses.
Relevant project experience includes the following:
Evaluation of Library Services. He conducted operations
and service level analyses of library services for Palo Alto
and San Mateo; developed a facilities master plan for the
County of San Mateo library system; and evaluated the cost
and revenue impact of withdrawing from the Riverside
County Library system for Moreno Valley. Mr. Heiss also
evaluated library service levels for Escondido and identified
service level adjustments (and associated costs) to bring the
City to a "B" level of library service (compared to service
levels in similar jurisdictions elsewhere in California)
through City buildout. Last year, he conducted the
preliminary feasibility study of Laguna Hills establishing
its own library compared to remaining part of the Orange
County Public Library.
Governance and Regional Library Service Studies.
Mr. Heiss is project manager and lead analyst in our
current library services study for Contra Costa County,
California, and the 18 cities which are member of the
system. The project includes detailed evaluation of current
operations and service levels; development and evaluation
of a number of alternative service delivery and governance
models; and conduct of a county-wide attitude survey to
determine citizens' attitudes toward the quality and
availability of library services. Earlier in the year, Mr.
Heiss was project manager and lead analyst on our
analysis of library services for Orange County, California.
This project evaluated current service levels; projected costs
David M. Griffith & Associates @@, I I., -@i- :@l
Project Team Resumes
and revenues for a number of different service delivery
models; and recommended an alternative approach to
library system governance.
Mr. Heiss has an AB from Dartmouth College and an MBA from the
@arton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
David Mz. Griffithz&@@Associ-ates
Project Team Resumes
BEVERLEY SIMMONS
Ms. Simmons will serve as a
Project Analyst
Ms. Simmons is a senior library service professional with
extensive operating and consulting experience gained from over 2 years
experience in the library service area. She would assist the project team in
evaluating service levels and operations, and structuring library services
under the various alternatives evaluated.
Ms. Simmons has served as a special consultant to DMG on both our
recent library systems analyses for Contra Costa and Orange counties. On
both projects, she had responsibility for developing alternative service
delivery models including defining service levels and developing pro-forma
operating budgets. She is currently working with the City of Mission Viejo
to develop an operating plan for the new City library. She has also recently
completed an evaluation of the Marin County Library system.
Ms. Simmons served as Project Director of the 1994-1995 California
Library Restructuring Project conducted by a 25 person Task Force
commissioned by the League of California cities, the California Library
Association, the California State Association of Counties, and the
California Association of Library Trustees and Commissioners. The
project focused on addressing the underlying issues of library governance
and finance, and provided a blueprint for fundamental change in
California library services.
Previously she served as Director of Libraries for the City of
Sunnyvale and during this period, in addition to directing all aspects of
library services, expanded library services to the Silicon Valley business
community by establishing a partnership between the City and the Federal
Patent and Trademark Office to bring the latest patent information and
technology to Silicon Valley. Concurrently, she also served as the Director
of Information Management Services for Sunnyvale and in this capacity,
directed information systems staff and services, developed a City-wide
networking plan, and introduced personal computers throughout the City.
Ms. Simmons has also served as City Librarian in two
Massachusetts cities, and as a library services consultant for the states of
Massachusetts and North Carolina.
She is active in state and national library service organizations, and
has chaired several panels on library services for the California League of
Cities. Ms. Simmons has Bachelor of Arts, and a Masters in Library
Science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
David M. Griffith & Associates,--,,-
Project Team Resumes
JACQUELYN HARBERT
Ms. Harbert will serve as a
Project Analyst
Ms. Harbertis a Manager in our Cupertino, CA office. She has
a BA in Psychology (Cum Laude) from the University of Southern
California and Master's degrees in Educational Counseling and in Public
Administration. Her 18 years of public sector experience encompasses a
wide range of consulting and administrative positions.
Specific experience includes:
Playing a major role in our analysis of library services for
Contra Costa County and 18 member cities. Her
responsibilities included profiling current service levels'
conducting focus group work shops with a number of
member city councils to identify library service issues, and
develop, cost out, and evaluate a variety of organizational
and operational library service delivery alternatives
Task leader for the City of San Jose (Pop. 830,000) study
group which reviewed and developed recommendations to
streamline the budget development information and
reporting requirements.
Managed a self-insured workers' compensation program
for Alameda County (CA - Pop. 1.3 million), reduced the
backlog of litigated cases, and significantly improved
interdepartmental cooperation through training of over 800
departmental management personnel in workers'
compensation issues.
0Analyzed and developed an approach to consolidating three
distinct county operations into existing departments for
Alameda County, CA (Pop. 1,275,000).
0Assisted the City/County of Denver in improving efficiency
and management of building maintenance operations.
aReviewed operational effectiveness of City of Huntington
Beach, CA (Pop. 180,000) workers' compensation program.
0Assisted the City of Los Angeles, CA in benchmarking all of
its general fund operations.
David M. @ Griffith & Associates"
Proiect Team Resumes
GREG TANANBAUM
Mr. Tananbaum will serve as
a Project Analyst
Mr. Tananbaumis a consultant with David M. Griffith &
Associates. He has been with the firm for over one year. Previously, he
worked in Australia as a private school instructor, specializing in courses
in government.
Since joining DMG, Mr. Tananbaum has participated in an
operating and financial evaluation of the Centre Concord. His
responsibilities included documenting and evaluating the competitive
market in which the Centre currently operates, and developing alternative
marketing strategies for the Centre. He also worked on a management
audit of the Mountain View Police Department during which he assisted
Mr. Heiss in the evaluation of field patrol staffing and service levels. He
played a major role on our Orange County Library during which his project
responsibilities included data collection and cost analysis of current and
projected library operations.
He is currently a member of our project team for the Contra Costa
County library services study. His responsibilities focus on data collection
in support of other team members. This includes detailed analysis of
branch library usage patterns, system operating costs and cost estimates
for service delivery/governance alternatives, and revenue analysis for each
of the various service delivery alternatives being developed by the project
team.
Mr. Tananbaum has a BA from Yale University, and a Masters
Degree from the London School of Economics.
David M. -. Grifflth', & Associates
OFFICE DIRECTORY
Corporate Headquarters Indiana Ohio (continued)
630 Dundee Rd., Suite 200 1 0 1 W. Ohio SL, Suite 1730 700 Ackerman Rd., Suite 150
Northbrook, IL 60062 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Columbus, OH 43202
1-800-291-9270 Tel: (3 17) 634-7040 Tel: (614) 447-0288
DMG Tel: (708) 564-9270 Fax: (3 17) 637-7835 Fax: (614) 447-0626
Fax: (708) 564-9136 Iowa Pennsylvania
Arizona 114 Public Square 500 Nationwide Dr.
I 1 30 E. Missouri Ave. Greenfield, IA 50849 Suite 200
Suite 550 Tel: (5 1 5) 343-7352 Harrisburg, PA 171 1 0
Phoenix, AZ 85014 Kansas Tel: (717) 233-2600
Tel: (602) 277-2330 940 N.Tyler Rd., Suite 204 Fax: (717) 652-2881
Fax: (602) 279-7174 Wichita, KS 67212 Puerto Rico
California Tel: (3 16) 729-0732 Midtown Building, Suite 614
57 1 5 Marconi Ave., Suite A Fax: (316) 729-073 3 420 Ponce de Leon Ave.
Carmichael, CA 95608 Hato Rey, PR 009 1 8
Tel: (916) 485-8102 Louisiana Tel: (809) 753-6503
Fax: (916) 485-01 1 1 302 North Pine Fax: (809) 250-7906
DeRidder, LA 70634
201 1 1 Stevens Creek Blvd. Tel: (318) 463-7933 South Carolina
Suite 145 Fax: (318) 463-8077 121 Executive Center Dr.
Cupertino, CA 95014 Suite 206
Tel: (408) 366-0260 Maryland Columbia, SC 292 1 0
Fax: (408) 366-0263 1350 Piccard Dr., Suite I 00 Tel: (803) 772-2014
221 E.Walnur-Suite 179 Rockville. MD 20850 Fax: (803) 772-2186
Tel:(301) 869-2002
Pasadena, CA 91 1 01 Fax: (301) 869-1494 Tennessee
Tel: (818) 564-0401 301 S. Perimeter Park Dr.
Fax: (818) 564-1689 Michigan Suite 100
2212 26th St.
Canada Bay City, MI 48708 Nashville,TN 37211
Suite 202 Tel: (517) 894-2002 Tel: (615) 781-4399
542 Mount Pleasant Road Fax: (5 1 7) 894-5075 Fax: (615) 781-4243
Toronto, ON M4S 2M7 Texas
Tel: (416) 488-4666 M.A.C. Building 13601 Preston Rd.
Fax: (416) 445-7547 935 N. Washington Ave. Suite 40OW
Lansing, MI 48906
Colorado Dallas,TX 75240
Tel:(517) 484-4240
10200 E. Girard Ave. Tel: (214) 490-9990
Fax:(517) 484-301 1
Building B, Suite 223 Fax: (214) 490-3040
Denver, CO 80231 Minnesota
Tel: (303) 755-1996 555 Park St., Suite 408 8303 Southwest Freeway
Fax: (303) 755-5490 SL Paul, MN 55103 Suite 900
Tel: (612) 292-9225 Houston,TX 77074
Florida Tel: (713) 541-5457
Fax:(612) 292-0243
1621 Metropolitan Blvd, Fax: (713) 541-6649
Suite 201 Nebraska Utah
Tallahassee, FL 32308 306 E. Seventh P. 0. Box 51471
Tel: (904) 386-1 1 01 York, NE 68467 Provo, UT 84605
Fax: (904) 386-3599 Tel: (402) 362-2298
Lakeview Corporate Center Fax: (402) 362-6727 Tel: (801) 377-0199
Virginia
6415 Lake Worth Road, Suite 312 NewYork 500 I W. Village Green Dr.
West Palm Beach, FL 33463 14 Computer Drive East
Suite 205
Tel: (407) 967-1700 Albany, NY 1220S Midlothian,VA 23112
Fax: (407) 967-1799 Tel: (S I 8) 446-1302 Tel: (804) 744-2390
Georgia North Carolina Fax: (804) 744-451 1
1280W. Peachtree St. I 100 Logger Court Washington
Suite 200 Suite D- I 00 120 State Ave., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30309 Raleigh, NC 27609
Suite 401
Tel: (404) 874-6696 Tel: (919) 876-8042
Olympia,WA 98SO I
Fax: (404) 874-5590 Fax: (919) 878-8592 Tel: (206) 9S6-0912
Illinois Ohio Fax: (206) 754-1797
525 E. Pine 9930 johnnycake Ridge Rd,
Wisconsin
Springfield, IL 62703 Suite 2G
2445 Darwin Rd., Suite 201
Tel: (217) 789-0041 Concord Township, OH 44060
Madison,Wl 53704
Tel:(216) 639-0288
Tel:(217) 789-0042
Fax: (217) 789-6342 Fax: (216) 639-1328 Tel: (608) 244-3090
Fax: (608) 244-3560
DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
4115195
Professional Services for the Public Sector