The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About012798 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the Citv to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 27, 1998- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council/Redevelopment Agenda pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation, Pratt v. City of Temecula et al. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: 45012 Corte Cristina Negotiating Parties: Joseph & Anita Lopez and City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency; Under negotiation: Price and Terms of payment of potential acquisition. 3. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: 41818 6th Street (APN 922-022-013) Negotiating Parties: Rosilie Jett, John H. & Rosilie Thomas and City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency; Under negotiation: Price and Terms of payment of potential acquisition. 4. §54957, City Manager Annual Evaluation 5. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Property: approximately 120 acres located westerly of Pujol Street; Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula, John Firestone and Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1; Under negotiation: Price and Terms of payment of potential acquisition. 6. §54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel, Potential Litigation, two matters. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 98-03 Resolution: No. 98-04 R:\Agenda\012798 1 CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Matthew Fagan James Field, First Baptist Church Mayor Pro Tern Ford Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Presentation to Melody Brunsting, Tom Langley and Dave Stovall, CRC Foundation Presidents CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calender are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. I Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:\Agenda\012798 2 2 Resolution AD0roving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Performance Based Service Management Study RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 3.2 Approve amendment with David M. Griffith & Associates for a Performance Based Service Management Study in an amount not to exceed $50,000. Appropriate $40,000 from General Fund unreserved fund balance to the Finance Department Consulting budget. 1998 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewel RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the renewal of the Annual Agreement with California Compensation (CAL Comp) for the City's Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. Authorize TemDorarv Street Closures for Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event in Old Town (Located on Front Street, and related streets, between Moreno Street and First Street) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1998 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS R:\Agenda\012798 3 6 Street Name Chanoe from Green Meadow R0~d to Kahwea Road RECOMMENDATION' 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF GREEN MEADOW ROAD TO KAHWEA ROAD Contract for Grant Funding through the De_oartment of Water Resources, Urban Streams Restoration Prooram RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled' RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING CONTRACT FOR AN URBAN STREAMS RESTORATION GRANT FOR THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS, AND DESIGNATING CONTRACT MANAGER AND FISCAL AGENT Membership in the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING APPLICATION TO JOIN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT R:\Agenda\012798 4 9 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-01 10 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AMENDMENT # 6 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219),THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-020- 004, 950-020-009 THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020- 029, 955-030-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 98-02 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI- FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY R:\Agenda\012798 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITy SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01 Resolution: No. CSD 98-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item net listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and 81;ate your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 13, 1998. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson R:\Agenda\012798 6 GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting' February 10, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\012798 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: Ne. RDA 98-01 Resolution: No. RDA 98-0! ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 1 Generic Manvf~cturing Owner Partici_~tion Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION R:\Agenda\012798 8 1.2 That the Agency Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts AGENCY BUSINESS Acquisition of Prooertv for Affordable Housing RECOMMENDATION' 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES Consideration of Fundinq for a Mural at Sixth Street Parking Lot RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Consider granting 95,000 to fund a mural at the Sixth Street Parking Lot. 4 Consideration of SDOnSOrShiDs Reouests RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Agency members consider the sponsorship requests for: a. Temecula Rod Run - 910,000 Great Temecula Tractor Race - 910,000 Frontier Days Rodeo - 910,000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival - 925,000 R:\Agenda\012798 9 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 10, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services district Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\012798 10 WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: No. WIA 98-01 Resolution: No. WIA 98-02 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Steve Ford presiding ROLL CALL: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts ABSTAIN: Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Westside Improvement Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Ron Roberts Any person may submit written comments to the City Council/Westside Improvement Authority before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the District Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Finan~;ing fQr Westside Area Public Improvements and Open-Space Acauisition and the Western B¥_oass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY R:\Agenda\012798 11 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Open the Public Hearings, accept any written protests and take any oral testimony, determine that certain land initially included in the boundaries of the District should be removed from the District, that maintenance of open space will not be funded by the District and whether or not transient occupancy taxes and/or sales taxes arising from development in the District will be used to offset special taxes levied by the District. That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN R:\Agenda\012798 12 1.7 That the Board of Directors read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AUTHORITY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the next regular meeting: February 10, 1998, scheduled to follow the Redevelopment Agency meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California R:\Agenda\012798 13 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINQ$ Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 11 Review of the ;~4th Year Community Development Block Grant {CDBG) Application Proposals for FY 1 ~)8/1999 RECOMMENDATION' 11.1 Review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding proposals, approve the reduction of projects equally on a percentage basis in the event of future funding reductions and consider the two funding recommendations presented by the Finance Committee: Option A: Approve CDBG funding in the amount of $286,304 for projects identified in Attachment B, and, or; Option B: Approve CDBG funding in the amount of $286,304 and General Fund funding in the amount of $47,123 to meet Public Service funding requests in excess of available CDBG funds identified in Attachment B. Appropriate $47,123 from General Fund reserves to Community Services Funding Program Line Item. 12 Planning ApDlication No. PA98-0438 {Amendment No. 4 tO $p~(;ifi~; Plen NO. 1~)9) - Temeku Hills RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and findings that a subsequent EIR is not required. 12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled' RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97- 0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) R:\Agenda\012798 14 12.3 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) COUNCIL BUSINESS 13 Administrative Citations RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled' ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE 13.2 Set the date, time and location of a Public Hearing on the proposed ordinance for February 10, 1998, at 7:00 pm, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 14 Selection of D~t~ for Saturday Workshop for City Council Goal Settin_o RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Select a date for a Saturday, City Council Workshop DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 10, 1998, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\012798 15 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS City of emecula Certificate of 2 kppreciation Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the citizens of ~he City of.Temeoula TO: This expression of ~he community's &epest appreciation serves to acknowledge the generous contributions made by Dave $tovall to the excellence of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Foundation. His dediea~ service a~ a past Presi&n~ and ourren~ l~oard Member since 1~4 ha~ grea~l~ enhanced ~he auality of life for all of our d~izens, especially our youth.~ He exemplifies all of the audiflea of leadership that ia an example to us all. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 27~h day of January, 1998 Ron Roberta ~[ayor Susan W. Jones, CIVIC Deputy City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Appreciation Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula TO~ This expression of the community's deepest appreciation serves ~o acknowledge the generous contributions made by Melody Brunsting to the excellence of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Foundation. Her dedicated service as a past President and current Board Member since 1991 has gready enhanced the quality of life for all of our citizens, especially our youth. She exemplifies all of the qualities of leadership that is an example to us all. In Witness Whereof, ! have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 27th day of January, 1998 Ron Roberts Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk _. City of Ternecula Certificate of Appreciation Presented in appreciation and sratitude on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula TO: This expression of the community's deepest appreciation serves to acknowle~e the senerous contributions made by Tom Lan~!ey to the excellence of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Foundation. His dedicated ser6ce as the Founder, President and Boanl Member since 1989 has ~ready enhanced the quality of life for all of our citizens, especially our youth. He exemplifies all of the qualities of leadership that is an example to us all. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 27th day of January, 1998 Ron Rober~ Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.~ULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,081,923.49. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 27th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Rems 98- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 01/08/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/15/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/27/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/08/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/27198 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 -190 191 ' 192 193 194 210 28O 300 320 33O 34O 390 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TCSD - DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 28O 30O 320 33O 34O GENERAL RDA-LOWlMOD TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-ClP INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BYFUND: GEI~E ~BERTS, DII~ECTOR OF FINANCE RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 302,545.69 122,424.58 512,192.61 144,760.61 $ 1~0O1~923.49 529,883.96 91,047.35 65,661.44 10,627.27 24,313.34 26,951.91 701.57 135,178.13 7,336.93 1,137; 08 12,733.46 8,531.22 0.00 937,162.88 99,008.98 4,521.64 25,483.56 69.13 179.01 2,205.45 980.27 4,937.96 2,813.23 783.00 3~128.54 1 44,760.61 $ 1~081~923.49 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ,HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHEFOLLOWINGIS TRUEAND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 01 / 08/98 14:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 12 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 113,612.82 87,255.85 26,854.70 45.73 107.47 2,209.91 701.57 39,564.69 6,969.06 777.58 7,228.57 9,481.52 7,7'36.22 TOTAL 302,545.69 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 47269 01/08/98 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, JOINT CH AGREEMENT:PARKVIEN ST 210-2038 2,612.33 2,612.33 47270 01/08/98 002129 GREAT NEST CONTRACTORS, JOINT CK AGREEMENT:PARKVIEN ST 210-2038 19,229.76 19,229.76 47271 01/08/98 002129 GREAT NEST CONTRACTORS, JOINT CK AGREEMENT:PARKVIEN ST 210-2038 2,140.00 2,140.00 47272 01/08/98 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, JOINT CK AGREEMENT:PARKVIEW ST 210-2038 1,898.74 1,898.74 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 828898 01/08/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 31.79 5.94 33.95 3.03 3.54 3,627.06 209.93 745.17 1.55 3.78 61.40 23.95 208.40 22.82 125.52 22.07 70.99 5,200.89 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 8518,~9 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 8518,~9 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 8518,~9 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 851889 01/08/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 14,271.23 658.13 3,136.50 8.84 22.97 308.15 136.77 648.49 87.67 544.00 108.13 343.14 3,784.09 167.78 922.63 2.38 6.15 76.91 36.45 183.32 24.12 120.24 26.88 109.23 25,734.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 971231 12/31/97 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO RDA PURCHASE PROP.42220 6TH ST 165-199-812-5804 81,343.50 81,343.50 47275 01/08/98 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SOFTBALL & BASKETBALL AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 700.38 700.38 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 570.36 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 12.90 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 73.12 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 1.72 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 14.64 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 4.30 47276 01/08/98 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 21.50 698.54 47277 01/08/98 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP '98;G.THORNHILL 001-161-999-5226 385.00 47277 01/08/98 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP '98 D. HOGAN 001-161-999-5226 287.00 47277 01/08/98 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC MEMBERSHIP 97/98:C. DONAHOE 001-161-999-5226 271.00 943.00 47278 01/08/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 209.91 47278 01/08/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR MAINT FAC. 340-199-702-5240 50.20 47278 01/08/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 23.59 283.70 47279 01/08/98 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL C/O #1 CITYWIDE PC REPAIRS 001-164-601-5402 2,291.25 2,291.25 47280 01/08/98 BRASS, RICHARD REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 001-2370 3,860.46 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 165-2370 121.64 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 190-2370 1,248.90 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 191-2370 .83 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 192-2370 2.06 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 193-2370 53.20 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 194-2370 24.38 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 280-2370 94.31 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 300-2370 8.08 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 320-2370 41.24 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 330-2370 8.21 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 340-2370 265.34 47281 01/08/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP FOR DEC 97 190-181-999-5112 1.20 47282 01/08/98 001183 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WAT SECTION 401 PERMIT:DESILTING 190-180-999-5250 500.00 5,729.85 500.00 47283 01/08/98 CALVERY CHAPEL OF MURRI REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 47283 01/08/98 CALVERY CHAPEL OF MURRI REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 8.00- 92.00 47284 01/08/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. BADDON, 04/06/96 300-199-999-5205 367.75 367.75 47285 01/08/98 003088 CASCADIA SPORT SYSTEMS HOCKEY RINK KICKSTRIP 190-180-999-5212 2,775.00 47285 01/08/98 003088 CASCADIA SPORT SYSTEMS HOCKEY RINK PUCKBOARD 190-180-999-5212 600.00 47285 01/08/98 003088 CASCADIA SPORT SYSTEMS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5212 100.00 47285 01/08/98 003088 CASCADIA SPORT SYSTEMS SHIPPING-HOCKEY RINK PRODUCTS 190-180-999-5212 127.98 47286 01/08/98 001410 CITIZEN'S SCHOLARSHIP 97/98 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING 001-101-999-5267 4,000.00 3,602.98 4,000.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S 001-2330 22.00 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 56.00 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 66.50 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 47.75 47287 01/08/98 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 107.02 339.02 47288 01/08/98 CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE FIRE PREV.CLASS-4/27-5/1WINDSR 001-171-999-5261 42.50 42.50 47289 01/08/98 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140 82.50 82.50 47290 01/08/98 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS AND MISC SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 61.51 61.51 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. OCT PRKG CITATION PROCESSING 001-140-999-5250 247.00 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. OCT PRKG CITATION PROCESSING 001-170-999-5250 247.00 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. NOV PRKG CITATION PROCESSING 001-140-999-5250 145.25 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. NOV PRKG CITATION PROCESSING 001-170-999-5250 145.25 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. CREDIT:OVERCHARGED CIT PROCESS 001-170-999-5250 15.00- 47291 01/08/98 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. CREDIT:OVERCHARGED CIT PROCESS 001-140-999-5250 15.00- 754.50 47292 01/08/98 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE RETAIN PUBLIC ADVOCACY FIRM 001-110-999-5248 2,000.00 2,000.00 47293 01/08/98 002466 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY JAN ELEVATOR SERVICE/MAINT 340-199-701-5212 199.10 199.10 47294 01/08/98 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 209.27 209.27 47295 01/08/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/19 DIAZ 001-140-999-5118 47295 01/08/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 12/19 CABRAL 001-171-999-5118 1,653.49 1,450.38 3,103.87 47296 01/08/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 13.55 47296 01/08/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230 6.60 47296 01/08/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 34.00 47296 01/08/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-163-999-5230 8.95 47296 01/08/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230 12.00 75.10 47297 01/08/98 FIRE SAFETY TRUST FIRE PREV 1-C CLASS:WINDSOR 001-171-999-5261 70.00 70.00 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 684.00 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 16.83 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 143.10 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 .45 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 1.35 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2360 14.85 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 8.10 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 23.67 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 4.50 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 18.00 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 9.00 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 21.15 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 1,300.44 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 47.72 VOUCHRE2 01/08/98 14:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUHBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUHBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 47298 01/08/98 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 LTD 002002 STD 002002 STD OO2O02 STD OO2OO2 STD 002002 STD 002002 STD 002002 STD OO2OO2 STD 002002 STD 002002 STD 002002 STD 002002 STD 190-2380 191-2380 192-2380 193-2380 194-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 340-2380 001-2500 165-2500 190-2500 191-2500 192-2500 193-2500 194-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 340-2500 263.43 .90 2.22 27.46 13.01 56.98 8.71 44.71 8.91 32.01 1,397.12 51.27 282.99 .97 2.40 29.51 13.96 61.23 9.35 48.03 9.57 34.39 4,692.29 47300 01/08/98 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 47300 01/08/98 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARO - W 002982 ST DED ST DED 190-2140 280-2140 30.00 25.00 55.00 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 47301 01/08/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-161-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 120.68 70.00 6.25 3.85 28.00 6.00 8.50 10.40 10.31 263.99 47302 01/08/98 002883 FRY'S ELECTRONICS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 632.48 632.48 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 47303 01/08/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-308-1079-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-676-3526-DEC-FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 909-693-0956-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-694-4356-DEC-HINTERGARDT 320-199-999-5208 909-694-8927-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-695-1409-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-695-3539-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-699-2309-DEC-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 53.67 77.70 26.74 28.87 26.31 85.74 37.13 35.06 371.22 47'304 01/08/98 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 100.00 47305 01/08/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. 47305 01/08/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. DEC PROF SRVCS-PALA RD BRIDGE 210-165-631-5801 DEC CONSULTING SERVICES 001-110-999-5248 5,000.00 500.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 47305 01/08/98 000351 GILLISS, MAX C.M. DEC CONSULTING SERVICES 001-164-604-5248 500.00 6,000.00 47306 01/08/98 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI GFOA CF:6/Z8-7/1;RBRTS;MCDRMTT 001-140-999-5258 550.00 550.00 47307 01/08/98 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, DEBIT:FIRE ST#84 COMPLETED WRK 210-190-626-5804 5,000.00 5,000.00 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5242 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SUPPLIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 47308 01/08/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC 190-184-999-5212 74.08 39.27 155.46 97.84 246.84 40.80 654.29 47309 01/08/98 000796 I C B 0 CODE ED CF:SMITH:2/11-13/98 001-162-999-5261 165.00 165.00 47310 01/08/98 000388 I C B O, INC. ON YOUR SIDE VIDEO 001-162-999-5261 47310 01/08/98 000388 I C B O, INC. FREIGHT 001-162-999-5261 47310 01/08/98 000388 I C B O, INC. JOHNSON & WEAVER VIDEO 001-162-999-5261 47310 01/08/98 000388 I C B O, INC. SALES TAX 001-162-999-5261 19.95 7.50 24.50 3.45 55.40 47311 01/08/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 47311 01/08/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 47311 01/08/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 47'511 01/08/98 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 1,784.36 18.76 368.33 34.23 2,205.68 47312 01/08/98 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 297.04 297.04 47313 01/08/98 002909 K W C ENGINEERING, INC. DESIGN SRVCS-RCSP SIDEWALK 47313 01/08/98 002909 K W C ENGINEERING, INC. DESIGN SRVCS-RCSP SIDEWALK 210-190-154-5802 210-190-154-5802 2,362.50 780.00 3,142.50 47314 01/08/98 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 MILES 001-163-999-5118 47314 01/08/98 001~7 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 MILES 001-164-604-5118 47314 01/08/98 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/21 MILES 001-163-999-5118 47314 01/08/98 001~7 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/21 MILES 001-164-604-5118 72.80 218.40 72.80 218.40 582.40 47315 01/08/98 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 JOHNSON 165-199-999-5118 44.20 47315 01/08/98 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 12/14 JOHNSON 280-199-999-5118 44.20 47315 01/08/98 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 12/21 PETERSON 001-140-999-5118 249.60 338.00 47316 01/08/98 001982 L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I CITYWIDE R-O-W TREE TRIMMING 001-164-601-5402 4,900.00 4,900.00 47317 01/08/98 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI SR CTR PRKG LOT LIGHT REPAIRS 190-181-999-5212 47-517 01/08/98 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI VARIOUS PARKS-LIGHTING REPAIR 190'180'999'5212 247.00 459.50 706.50 47318 01/08/98 002890 LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TE 909-223-1667-DEC-J.D. 001-170-999-5208 34.64 34.64 47319 01/08/98 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY FOLDER SERVICE/ REPLACED PARTS 330-199-999-5217 321.29 47319 01/08/98 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY FOLDER SERVICE/LABOR 330-199-999-5217 187.50 47319 01/08/98 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY SALES TAX 330-199-999-5217 24.90 533.69 47320 01/08/98 NARDONE, JOSEPH REIMB:CNCA CERT FOR TEM K-9 001-170-999-5261 25.00 25.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47321 01/08/98 001713 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. FIRST ST REALIGNMNT DESIGN SER 280-199-807-5802 1,090.00 1,090.00 47322 01/08/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 341.14 341.14 47323 01/08/98 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. DEC 97 RDA CONSULTING SERVS 165-199-999-5248 2,780.93 47323 01/08/98 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. DEC 97 RDA CONSULTING SERVS 280-199-999-5248 926.98 47323 01/08/98 001383 P M ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. DEC RDA CONSULTANT SERV:OLD T~ 001-2640 866.25 4,574.16 47324 01/08/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI DESK TOP EXTENSION:LAND DEV 001-163-999-5601 280.00 47324 01/08/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI SALES TAX 001-163-999-5601 21.70 301.70 47325 01/08/98 000525 PARKS, RONALD d. REIMB:INTERVIEN PANAL 001-163-999-5260 43.49 43.49 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130 10.70 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 20,160.20 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 790.85 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2130 3.34 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 3,926.04 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.16 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 32.40 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 405.90 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 195.22 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2130 1.00 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 911.68 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 131.88 47'526 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 650.10 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 129.58 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 476.10 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 238.31 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 74.04 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.75 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 14.78 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .05 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .14 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.54 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .84 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 2.43 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 1.86 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 47326 01/08/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.18 28,177.46 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 136.51 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 45.50 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 37.15 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 FHP 001-2090 15.48 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 87.27 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 165-2090 1.07 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 52.21 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 3.37 47327 01/08/98 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 340-2090 9.39 VOUCHRE2 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 47327 01/08/98 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS VENDOR NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO PACIFICR PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS REV AETNA SO AETNA SO AETNA SO BLSHIELD BLSHIELD BLSHIELD CIGNA CIGNA HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PACIFICR PC PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS DED PERS-ADM 47328 01/08/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 47329 01/08/98 PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 300-2090 001-2090 190-2090 191-2090 192-2090 193-2090 194-2090 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 194-2090 001-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2122 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5262 190-181-999-5220 190-183-999-5350 190-183-999-5370 001-150-999-5265 001-199-4060 001-140-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-162-999-5214 001-120-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 280-199-999-5260 001-140-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 11.85 100.15 52.02 128.96 680.93- 161.59 212.83 70.93 718.33 360.67 1.51 1,002.35 39.46 5,176.18 1,409.73 15.57 31.05 310.50 46.53 2.39 155.25 765.28 2,082.75 148.83 4,135.11 674.45 19.00 104.45 16.00 2,382.68 320.00 1,141.78 115.23 49.85 3.94 62.06 20.67 32.00 6.45 12.61 23.00 1.39 12.92 18.31 34.23 15.06 27.30 18.34 20.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 21,620.43 49.85 VOUCHRE2 01/08/98 14:11 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47329 01/08/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 47329 01/08/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 47329 01/08/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5301 47329 01/08/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 47329 01/08/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5263 35.39 45.00 22.58 49.09 18.00 478.34 47330 01/08/98 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA POSTAGE FOR BUS LIC RENEWAL 001-199-4056 1,280.00 1,280.00 47331 01/08/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: 97-22 001-120-999-5256 47331 01/08/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: 97-23 001-120-999-5256 47331 01/08/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CC~4PAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PW97-10CSD 001-120-999-5256 47331 01/08/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-1058 001-120-999-5256 8.00 9.50 36.50 19.50 73.50 47332 01/08/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL: TCC 190-18~-999-5250 47332 01/08/98 002930 PRUOENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL CRC 190-182-999-5250 47332 01/08/98 002930 PRUOENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL: CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 17.35 26.75 28.60 72.70 47'533 01/08/98 000635 R & d PARTY PALACE EQUIP FOR XMAS PRONO OLD TWN 280-199-999-5362 816.75 816.75 47334 01/08/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING METER 001-164-601-5250 232.41 232.41 47335 01/08/98 001942 S C SIGNS INSTALL/POST PUBLIC NOTICES 001-161-999-5256 650.00 650.00 47336 01/08/98 002505 SIGNS AND LUCITE PRODUC VARIOUS SIGNS FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5219 47336 01/08/98 002505 SIGNS AND LUCITE PRODUC FREIGHT 340-199-701-5219 47336 01/08/98 002505 SIGNS AND LUCITE PRODUC SALES TAX 340-199-701-5219 284.00 5.00 22.01 311.01 47337 01/08/98 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. TEEN ACTIVITIES SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5320 45.74 45.74 47338 01/08/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVS:MAINT FACIL 340-199-702-5250 40.00 40.00 47339 01/08/98 002718 SOUTHERN CALIF CITY CLE GENERAL MTG:O1/16/98:GREEK,J 001-120-999-5260 25.00 25.00 47340 01/08/98 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON INSTALL XFMR & SERV:MARGARITA 210-190-119-5802 541.36 541.36 47341 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-4946 SIXTH STREET 190-181-999-5240 47541 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5042 CiTY HALL 340-199-701-5240 47341 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 193-180-999-5240 47341 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-502-8077 VARIOUS METERS 340-199-702-5240 47341 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 66-77-795-6~12-01 FRONT ST 340-199-701-5240 47341 01/08/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66-77-795-8063-01 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 594.78 3,537.79 860.35 552.38 28.17 315.43 5,888.90 47342 01/08/98 000305 TARGET STORE RECREATION CLASSES SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 47342 01/08/98 000305 TARGET STORE SUPPLIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370 32.26 28.01 60.27 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 165-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 604.75 2.46 82.00 1.03 2.05 14.35 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 9 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 47343 01/08/98 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 3.07 7.~ 20.50 738.00 47344 01/08/98 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 47344 01/08/98 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL PRESENTATION FLOWERS:PARADE 001-100-999-5250 59.26 80.22 139.48 47345 01/08/98 003067 TEMECULA R.V. SUPPLIES FOR POLICE TRAILER 001-170-999-5214 47345 01/08/98 003067 TEMECULA R.V. SALES TAX 001-170-999-5214 83.81 6.50 90.31 47346 01/08/98 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SPORT TROPHYS - SOFTBALL 190-183-999-5380 47346 01/08/98 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SPORT TROPHY - SOFTBALL 190-183-999-5380 843.68 52.26 895.94 47347 01/08/98 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER MARKETING PROMOTIONS 280-199-999-5270 116.05 116.05 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 47348 01/08/98 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 47349 01/08/98 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES & EQUIP 190-183-999-5380 47349 01/08/98 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. ALL SPORT CONTROL CONSOLE 190-183-999-5380 47349 01/08/98 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-999-5380 47349 01/08/98 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5380 47350 01/08/98 001376 TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALL EMP OF YEAR GIFT CERTIFICATE 001-150-999-5265 3,996.50 296.25 480.00 208.75 9.50 350.00 866.14 400.00 50.00 31.00 100.00 5,341.00 1,347.14 100.00 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LiFE 165-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 280-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL AOVAN 001-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 165-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 280-2510 47351 01/08/98 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 223.25- 168.40 5.50 39.85 5.50 4.00 223.25 168.40 5.50 39.85 5.50 4.00 446.50 47352 01/08/98 001921 TRANSAMERICA INFORMATIO MTY METROSCAN SOFTWARE SUBSCRI 320-199-999-5211 497.25 497.25 47353 01/08/98 003005 TRU WEST, INC STANDARD LIFEGUARD JACKETS 190-183-999-5310 47353 01/08/98 003005 TRU WEST, INC FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 47353 01/08/98 003005 TRU WEST, INC SALES TAX 190-183-999-5310 192.00 4.16 13.92 210.08 47354 01/08/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 7,478.51 47354 01/08/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 228.40 47354 01/08/98 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,622.98 VOUCHRE2 01/08/98 14:11 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47354 47354 47354 47354 47354 47354 47354 47355 47355 47355 47355 47355 47356 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO CDEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S FISH & WILDLIFE SER 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR MIGRATORY BIRD PRMT:DUCK POND 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 280-2160 340-2160 190-180-999-5250 .75 24.32 90.83 481.73 58.98 583.33 134.81 476.96 89.20 509.16 45.42 53.18 25.00 10,704.64 1,173.92 25.00 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47357 47358 47358 47358 47358 47358 47358 47358 47358 47359 47359 47359 47359 47359 47359 47359 47360 47360 47360 47360 47360 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 01/08/98 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 002566 002566 002566 002566 002566 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-170-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 5305001995894 RR 5305001995910 RB 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995977 JK 001-100-999-5258 001-110-999-5263 001-150-999-5260 001-110-999-5261 001-150-999-5254 001-100-999-5265 001-110-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 000325 UW 001-2120 000325 UW 165-2120 000325 UW 190-2120 000325 U~ 192-2120 000325 UW 193-2120 000325 U~ 194-2120 000325 UW 340-2120 HARDDRIVE:3.1 GIG 320-199-999-5221 MODEN:US ROBOTICS EXTERNAL 56K 320-199-999-5221 97-98 INTERNET SERV & SETUP 320-199-999-5221 PC WORKSTATION:PENT 233MZ 320-1970 SALES TAX 320-1970 32.87 487.57 100.39 91.25 .64 276.69 56.93 1,420.48 202.88 2.56 360.98 987.23 86.89 60.59 153.00 60.00 106.25 75.00 155.69 152.00 6.00 36.80 .15 .75 4.01 .29 474.10 274.71 123.95 2,139.00 165.77 3,033.24 1,684.65 200.00 3,177.53 VOUCHRE2 01/08/98 14:11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 47361 01/08/98 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI 47362 01/08/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, 47362 01/08/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, 47363 01/08/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 47363 01/08/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 47363 01/08/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 47363 01/08/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 11 ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT TR 28309 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES:MAINT FACI 340-199-702-5212 1,239.11 95.06 273.08 2,515.15 910.52 5,043.63 122.84 OCT LEASE:4 DC-35 & 5343 COPIE 330-2800 OCT LEASE:4 DC-35 & 5343 COPIE 330-199-999-5391 OCT LEASE:4 DC-35 & 5343 COPIE 330-199-999-5217 OCT LEASE:4 DC-35 & 5343 COPIE 190-182-999-5217 1,239.11 368.14 8,592.14 TOTAL CHECKS 302,545.69 VOUCHRE2 01/15/98 11:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOI,//MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 19,575.35 3,791.50 11,431.74 9,594.54 24,205.87 4,408.00 36,331.12 367.87 359.50 8,808.15 3,251.94 299.00 TOTAL 122,424.58 VOUCHRE2 01/15/98 11:41 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 47364 01/09/98 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, 47367 01/15/98 002278 ABC SEWING & VACUUM 47368 01/15/98 47369 01/15/98 001916 47369 01/15/98 001916 47370 01/15/98 001314 47370 01/15/98 001314 47371 01/15/98 000747 47372 01/15/98 001947 AMERIGAS 47372 01/15/98 001947 AMERIGAS 47373 01/15/98 BAKER MOTIVATION 47374 01/15/98 002085 BARNEY & BARNEY 47375 01/15/98 BEGLEY, KAREN 47376 01/15/98 BURDICK-RUTZ, dERROLD E 47377 01/15/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CiTY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS PAGE 1 iTEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT DEBIT:FIRE ST#84 COMPLETED WRK 210-190-626-5804 PARTS AND SERVICE FOR FACILITY 190-180-999-5215 190-2900 ABELLA, ALEXIA C. REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT OCT/NOV SERV:RANCHO & 1-15 210-165-601-5801 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT OCT/NOV PROF SERV:PRJT PW96-15 210-165-655-5802 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. FORUM:1/24:THORNHILL,GUERRIERO 001-161-999-5260 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN. FORUM:1/24:THORNHILL,GUERRIERO 001-161-999-5272 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC PUBLICATIONS:PLANNING & LAW 001-161-999-5228 PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT COMMAND MOBILE TRAILER INSURAN REFUND:OVERPAYMENT BELLY DANCE 190-180-999-5263 190-2900 300-199-999-5200 190-183-4982 190-183-4992 300-199-999-5200 REFUND:ENTRY FEE;SANTA PARADE 95 KAWASAKI & FORD INSURANCE 47378 01/15/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA SR CTR LDSCP BARE PLANTER WORK 190-181-999-5212 5,000.00 9.67 100.00 2,835.96 1,880.71 50.00 50.00 15.00 82.17 25.99 100.00 100.00 5.00 20.00 124.00 441.00 568.00 660.00 135.50 150.00 50.00 45.00 25.45 12.55 43.08 9.95 2,300.00 850.00 65.88 182.70 47378 01/15/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA VINTAGE HILLS TREE REMOVAL 193-180-999-5212 47379 01/15/98 002803 CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP DEC ENG SERVS FOR CFD88-12 001-1280 47380 01/15/98 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., iNC. SEGOVIA, 08/14/95 300-199-999-5205 47381 01/15/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC 1ST QTR FIRE SYSTEM iNSPECTION 190-182-999-5250 47381 01/15/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC dAN ALARM MONITORING:CRC 190-182-999-5250 47381 01/15/98 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC dAN ALARM MONITORING:SR CTR 190-181-999-5250 47382 01/15/98 002037 COM-AID, INC. INSTALL OUTDOOR LIGHTNING 320-199-999-5242 47382 01/15/98 002037 COM-AID, INC. INSTALL OUTDOOR LIGHTNING 320-199-999-5250 47383 01/15/98 001193 COMP USA, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 47384 01/15/98 001275 COMPUSERVE, INC. SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE 320-199-999-5228 47385 01/15/98 002405 COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC ANNUAL MAINT ON DELTEC 18KVA 320-199-999-5215 47386 01/15/98 000864 CORONA CLAY CO., INC. TEMECULA MIDDLE SCHOOL REPAIR 190-180-999-5212 47386 01/15/98 000864 CORONA CLAY CO., INC. SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 47387 01/15/98 002981 DYNA MED CPR BRAD WITH CHEST OVERLAY 190-180-999-5301 5,000.00 9.67 100.00 4,716.67 100.00 15.00 108.16 100.00 100.00 5.00 20.00 124.00 1,009.00 660.00 135.50 245.00 38.00 43.08 9.95 2,300.00 915.88 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/15/98 11:41 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47387 01/15/98 002981 DYNA MED CPR BRAD WITH CHEST OVERLAY 001-150-999-5250 182.70 47387 01/15/98 002981 DYNA MED SALES TAX 190-180-999-5301 13.25 47387 01/15/98 002981 DYNA MED SALES TAX 001-150-999-5250 13.24 391.89 47388 01/15/98 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/19 DONAHOE 001-161-999-5118 1,146.92 1,146.92 47389 01/15/98 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVS 191-180-999-5248 540.00 47389 01/15/98 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVS 193-180-999-5248 1,127.60 47389 01/15/98 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE TCSD LDSCP PLAN CK & INSPECTIO 193-180-999-5248 1,257.40 47389 01/15/98 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LDSCP INSPECTION/VIA EDWARDO S 210-165-668-5804 450.00 47389 01/15/98 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE TCSD LDSCP PLAN CK & INSPECTIO 193-180-999-5248 540.00 3,915.00 47390 01/15/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE ROTARY DRAIN INSTALL/LDSCP 190-180-999-5415 195.00 47390 01/15/98 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS:SAM HICKS P 190-180-999-5415 1,890.00 2,085.00 47391 01/15/98 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER GENERATOR RENTAL:SANTAS PARADE 190-183-999-5370 141.12 141.12 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 4.90 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5277 19.85 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230 25.75 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 9.50 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 33.37 47392 01/15/98 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 190-180-999-5230 60.10 153.47 47393 01/15/98 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 47393 01/15/98 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MISC SUPPLIES FOR MAINT CREW 190-180-999-5212 8.70 001-164-601-5218 74.58 83.28 47394 01/15/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, CALENDAR/DATE BODK FOR 1998 001-171-999-5220 36.00 47394 01/15/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SALES TAX 001-171-999-5220 2.79 38.79 47395 01/15/98 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS SILICA SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMVL 001-164-601-5218 84.05 47395 01/15/98 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS SILICA SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMVL 001-164-601-5218 84.05 168.10 47396 01/15/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-1370 SVC FOR COP 001-110-999-5223 132.93 132.93 47397 01/15/98 G.M. TILE REFUND:TWO DAY ART CAMP 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 47398 01/15/98 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI 97 GFOA GOV'T GAAP VIDEO 001-140-999-5261 45.95 45.95 47399 01/15/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5214 21.54 21.54 47400 01/15/98 002372 HARMON, JUDY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 364.00 364.00 47401 01/15/98 003107 HAY DUDE RANCH, THE COSTUME RENTAL:TROLLEY OPERATR 280-199-999-5362 67.88 67.88 47402 01/15/98 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 130.70 130.70 47403 01/15/98 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS EMAIL MONTHLY SUPPORT & MAINT 320-199-999-5211 300.00 47403 01/15/98 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS NOVELL 4.1 USER MAINT 320-199-999-5211 4,648.80 47403 01/15/98 002140 dAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS NOVELL INTERNETWARE MASTER LIC 320-199-999-5211 125.00 47403 01/15/98 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION & SETUP 320-199-999-5211 491.20 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/15/98 11:41 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 47403 01/15/98 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5211 47404 01/15/98 000203 dOBS AVAILABLE, INC. ADVERTISING:PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 001-150-999-5254 369.97 5,934.97 64.80 64.80 47405 01/15/98 001894 JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY SPORTS PARK CHANNEL MNTNC. 190-180-999-5212 600.00 600.00 47406 01/15/98 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 MILES 001-163-999-5118 54.60 47406 01/15/98 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/28 MILES 001-164-604-5118 163.80 218.40 47407 01/15/98 001982 L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I TREE TRIMMING:PUJOL STREET 165-199-999-5250 2,080.00 2,080.00 47408 01/15/98 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI VARIOUS PARKS-LIGHTING REPAIR 190-180-999-5212 47408 01/15/98 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI VARIOUS PARKS-LIGHTING REPAIR- 190-180-999-5212 40.50 140.45 180.95 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE CLASSROOM STACKING CHAIRS 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE RECTANGULAR TABLE 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE (2) DOZEN SCHOOL SCISSORS 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE ACTIVITY CENTER 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE FREIGHT 47409 01/15/98 003055 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATE SALES TAX 190-182-999-5301 450.00 190-182-999-5301 298.00 190-182-999-5301 25.90 190-182-999-5301 39.50 190-182-999-5301 29.58 190-182-999-5301 63.04 906.02 47410 01/15/98 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES LEAGUE CF:2/11-13 R. BRADLEY 001-110-999-5258 300.00 300.00 47411 01/15/98 LEE, KEITH REIMB:NFL TRAVEL EXP:OLD TWN E 280-199-999-5362 100.00 100.00 47412 01/15/98 002046 MASTER K 9 INC NARCOTICS DETECTION COURSE 001-170-999-5261 2,000.00 47413 01/15/98 MCCUSKER ENTERPRISES, I REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 2,000.00 100.00 47414 01/15/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM FEB LEASE FOR CRC COPIER 190-182-999-5239 151.00 47414 01/15/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM SALES TAX 190-182-999-5239 11.70 162.70 47415 01/15/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUILD & SAFETY CORRECTION NTCE 001-162-999-5222 121.54 47415 01/15/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:PREISENDANZ,R. 001-161-999-5222 38.25 47415 01/15/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 2.96 47415 01/15/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:d.MEYLER 190-180-999-5222 102.50 47415 01/15/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222 7.94 273.19 47416 01/15/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 143.67 47416 01/15/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-604-5263 41.55 47416 01/15/98 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263 10.69 195.91 47417 01/15/98 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI CA319 MEMBERSHIP DUES 001-100-999-5226 2,289.00 47418 01/15/98 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT LANDSCAPE TECH AD 001-150-999-5254 43.56 2,289.00 43.56 47419 01/15/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 47419 01/15/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 190-180-999-5214 445.48 28.00 473.48 47420 01/15/98 003069 PACK N MAIL #2 DAILY MAIL DELIVERY-DEC 330-199-999-5250 35.00 35.00 VOUCHREZ 01/15/98 11:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET 47421 01/15/98 001561 PAGENET JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL JAN/MAR PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-100-999-5238 001-162-999-5238 001-163-999-5238 001-164-601-5238 001-170-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 001-120-999-5238 001-1990 001-110-999-5238 001-140-999-5238 001-1990 320-199-999-5238 001-165-999-5238 001-164-604-5238 75.00 151.88 23.51 112.50 157.50 245.17 26.51 111.68 50.32 27.29 185.62 29.91- 13.99- 10.21- 1,112.87 47422 01/15/98 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 177.60 177.60 47423 01/15/98 PALOMA VALLEY HIGH SCHO REFUND:SANTA ELECT PARADE FEE 190-183-4992 20.00 20.00 47424 01/15/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-163-999-5250 47424 01/15/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-171-999-5222 47424 01/15/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS SALES TAX 001-171-999-5222 47424 01/15/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-164-601-5250 47424 01/15/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 32.38 52.65 4.08 8.37 52.74 150.22 47425 01/15/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADS:VARIOUS JOBS 001-150-999-5254 47425 01/15/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PH-286 001-120-999-5256 47425 01/15/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0438 001-161-999-5256 47425 01/15/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: SERV LEVEL B 001-120-999-5256 47425 01/15/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0392 001-120-999-5256 284.73 22.25 19.50 19.50 21.25 367.23 47426 01/15/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 111.87 111.87 47427 01/15/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERV:MAINT FACILITY 340-199-702-5212 47427 01/15/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 47427 01/15/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 100.00 75.00 80.65 255.65 47428 01/15/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL;CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 47428 01/15/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL; CRC 190-182-999-5250 47428 01/15/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL: MAINT FACILI 340-199-702-5212 47428 01/15/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL; SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 47428 01/15/98 002930 PRUOENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL; TCC 190-184-999-5250 143.00 133.75 56.00 64.70 86.75 484.20 47429 01/15/98 002793 QUICK WRAP BAG PLAN BAGS FOR SHIPPING 001-161-999-5230 ?5.37 75.37 47430 01/15/98 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 92.02 92.02 47431 01/15/98 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB LDSCPE MAINT:BACKFLOW TESTING 193-180-999-5415 915.00 915.00 47432 01/15/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS: PW95-12 47432 01/15/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS: PW95-19CSD 210-165-601-5804 210-190-119-5804 71.33 914.96 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 01/15/98 11:41 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47432 01/15/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS AND MISC SUPPLIES 001-164-604-5268 47432 01/15/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS: PW97-10CSD 210-190-149-5804 18.32 398.96 1,403.57 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CAR WASHES FOR B&S VEHICLES 001-162-999-5214 25.00 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-165-999-5214 13.00 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5214 16.00 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5263 36.16 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-163-999-5214 10.00 47433 01/15/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 190-180-999-5214 10.00 110.16 47434 01/15/98 003102 REDDY ICE COHPANY ICE FOR WINTERWONDERLAND 1997 190-183-999-5370 1,659.35 1,659.35 47435 01/15/98 RIVERSIDE CO. BUSINESS PRTNRSHP SYMPOSIUM:YATES/LANIE 001-150-999-5260 110.00 110.00 47436 01/15/98 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:NT'L LEAGUE CF:11/29/97 001-100-999-5258 13.38 13.38 47437 01/15/98 S CA FIRE PREVENTION OF INSTALL SPRINKLER CF:DAVIDSON 001-171-999-5261 150.00 150.00 47438 01/15/98 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINT:TEM ELEM SCHOOL 190-180-999-5212 169.80 169.80 47439 01/15/98 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA CF:4/21-24:C.BROCKMEIER 001-162-999-5258 250.00 47439 01/15/98 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA CF:4/21-24:TOM HAFELI 320-199-999-5258 250.00 47439 01/15/98 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA:4/21-24:BEAL,OSVOLD,BEA 001-161-999-5258 750.00 47440 01/15/98 002681 SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SIERRA CF:4/21-24:R.WESTON 001-140-999-5258 170.04 47440 01/15/98 002(>81 SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SIERRA CF:4/21-24:C.BROCKMEIER 001-162-999-5258 170.04 47440 01/15/98 002681 SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SIERRA CF:4/21-24:TOM HAFEL! 320-199-999-5258 170.04 47440 01/15/98 002681 SILVER LEGACY RESORT & SIERRA:4/21-24:BEAL,OSVOLO,BEU 001-161-999-5258 510.12 47441 01/15/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CTRL SERV- CRC 190-182-999-5250 42.00 47441 01/15/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CTRL SERV: TCC 190-184-999-5250 36.00 47441 01/15/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CTRL SERV:SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 29.00 1,250.00 1,020.24 107.00 47442 01/15/98 000537 47442 01/15/98 000537 47442 01/15/98 000537 47443 01/15/98 000521 47444 01/15/98 000752 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 1,512.22 192-180-999-5319 24,205.87 191-180-999-5319 7,542.32 STEWART, BRUCE M. STREET ADDRESSING SERVICE 001-162-999-5250 1,200.00 STONE, JEFFREY E. REIMB:CHAMBER COMM DINNER 1/24 001-100-999-5260 85.00 33,260.41 1,200.00 85.00 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE PADDED FOLDING CHAIRS 001-170-999-5220 79.96 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE BUNGEE CORDS FOR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5220 15.98 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE BROOM FOR TEMECULA POLICE 001-170-999-5220 4.24 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE FIRST AID KIT FOR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5220 8.99 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE TOWELS FOR TEMECULA POLICE 001-170-999-5220 9.88 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE FEATHER DUSTER FOR TEM POLICE 001-170-999-5220 1.49 47445 01/15/98 000305 TARGET STORE SALES TAX 001-170-999-5220 9.34 129.88 47446 01/15/98 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER CHAMBER DINNER:1/24:J.COMERCHE 001-100-999-5260 85.00 85.00 VOUCHRE2 01/15/98 11:41 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 47447 01/15/98 000314 47448 01/15/98 000306 47449 01/15/98 47450 01/15/98 47451 01/15/98 002769 47452 01/15/98 47453 01/15/98 000459 47454 01/15/98 47455 01/15/98 002702 47456 01/15/98 002621 47456 01/15/98 002621 47456 01/15/98 002621 47456 01/15/98 002621 47456 01/15/98 002621 47456 01/15/98 002621 47457 01/15/98 000326 47457 01/15/98 000326 47457 01/15/98 000326 47458 01/15/98 000332 47459 01/15/98 001209 47459 01/15/98 001209 47459 01/15/98 001209 47459 01/15/98 001209 47459 01/15/98 001209 47459 01/15/98 001209 47460 01/15/98 47461 01/15/98 003089 47461 01/15/98 003089 47461 01/15/98 003089 47462 01/15/98 002109 47463 01/15/98 003105 47464 01/15/98 000345 47464 01/15/98 000345 47464 01/15/98 000345 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM DRAW REQUEST:50% MATERIAL CHRG 210-190-808-5804 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIGATION/MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 190-180-999-5212 TEMECULA VLLY LITTLE LE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL REFUND:SANTA ELECT PARADE FEE 190-183-4992 TODD'S FENCING RESIDENTIAL PRGM:TOM RONEY 165-199-813-5804 TOMAS RIVERA MIDDLE SCH REFUND:SANTA ELECT PARADE FEE 190-183-4992 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS/G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 TURQUOISE BRIGADE, THE REFUND:SANTA ELECT PARADE FEE 190-183-4992 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE:BUSINESS LIC RENEWAL 001-199-4056 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995886 SF 5305001995936 GR 5305001995936 GR 5305001995969 GT 5305001995928 MdM 5305001995928 MdM 280-199-999-5264 001-140-999-5258 001-120-999-5258 001-161-999-5258 280-199-999-5260 280-199-999-5270 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM RENTAL FOR PW MAINT UNIFORM RENTAL:TCSD CREW UNIFORM RENTAL: CRC 001-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE DEC 97 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE CART CTNR - T20 ARCHIVAL 001-120-999-527T DATA STORAGE MICROBOX ARCHIVAL 001-120-999-5277 APERTURE CARD BOX ARCHIVAL 001-120-999-5277 LEASED CTNR/INSERT CONT. 604 001-120-999-5277 LEASED CTNR/MICROBOX 648 001-120-999-5277 APERTURE CARD BOX 686 001-120-999-5277 VISCOSI, CYNTHIA REFUND: KINDER,BATON,COMPUTER 190-183-4982 WAKEFIELD COMPANY, THE WAKEFIELD COMPANY, THE WAKEFIELD COMPANY, THE VALVES FOR WATER PIPE REPAIR FREIGHT SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 WHITE CAP MAINT SUPPLIES:PW MAINT 001-164-601-5218 I,q~OLBRIGHTS ROOFING RESIDENTIAL PRGM: TOM RONEY 165-199-813-5804 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI OCT/DEC COPIER USAGE CHARGE 330-199-999-5239 CITY HALL COPIERS USAGE CHARGE 330-199-999-5217 CITY HALL COPIERS USAGE CHARGE 190-182-999-5217 ITEM AMOUNT 24,779.20 132.20 100.00 20.00 1,036.50 20.00 908.80 20.00 1,280.00 43.00 40.09 40.08 8.00 23.10 124.39 183.48 64.64 32.64 3,630.36 416.52 15.48 38.70 48.00 8.00 20.00 42.50 104.00 25.00 8.06 50.62 675.00 59.50 3,157.44 114.00 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 24,779.20 132.20 100.00 20.00 1,036.50 20.00 908.80 20.00 1,280.00 278.66 280.76 3,630.36 546.70 42.50 137.06 50.62 675.00 3,330.94 TOTAL CHECKS 122,424.58 VOUCHRE2 01/15/98 14:26 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 2 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 396,695.79 28,375.00 987.00 20,334.00 59,282.32 6,022.50 496.00 TOTAL 512,192.61 VOUCHRE2 01/15/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 47467 47468 47468 47469 47470 47470 47470 47470 47470 47470 47470 47470 47471 47471 47472 47472 47473 47473 47473 47474 47474 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47475 47476 47477 47477 14:26 CHECK DATE 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 01/27/98 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 001538 002541 002541 002951 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 002900 002900 000161 000161 000754 000754 000754 001056 001056 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000271 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA DEC PROF SRVCS:PW95-16 210-165-640-5802 BECKER, WALTER ICRRL BECKER, WALTER KARL ADD'T WORK-REMOVAL OF CONCRETE 001-164-601-5402 R&R DAMAGED FLOWLINE:CARMELITA 001-164-601-5402 BRUCE W. HULL & ASSOCIA APPRAISAL SRVCS IN CFD88-12 001-1160 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS,SLOPES CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA DEC LDSC MAINT-CITY HALL CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEC LDSC MAINT-FIRE STATION 84 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 001-171-999-5212 DANIEL, MANN, dOHNSON DANIEL, MANN, dOHNSON NOV PROF SRVCS-PW97-06 NOV PROF SRVCS-PW97-06 210-165-683-5802 210-165-683-5802 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. ANNUAL SUPPORT - EDEN SOFTWARE 320-199-999-5211 ANNUAL SUPPORT - EDEN SSS 320-199-999-5211 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ELLIOTT GROUP, THE REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLANS REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLANS REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLANS 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE DEC LDSCP MAINT:NEIGH PARKS DEC LDSCP MAINT:SLOPES 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5288 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5299 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5294 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5289 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5291 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-1230 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5281 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5282 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5262 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S PERIOD ENDING 10/22:LAW ENFORC 001-170-999-5279 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS OCT BOOKING FEES 001-170-999-5273 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & NOV PROF SERVS:WINCH DESIGN 210-165-686-5802 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN DEC PROF SERV:OVRLD/MARG RD 210-165-681-5802 TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN NOV PROF SERVS:WEST BYPASS COR 210-165-612-5802 5,110.00 1,410.00 4,910.00 12,500.00 17,250.00 246.00 1,593.00 325.00 987.00 11,521.00 496.00 250.00 4,242.79 9,506.09 4,927.50 1,095.00 932.00 9,999.00 814.00 8,961.00 8,813.00 225,188.90 36,051.20 9,029.00 21,088.16 7,574.13 7,574.13 26,035.20 2,470.80 17,630.06 4,407.21 8,832.00 12,055.04 20,871.90 7,496.50 000420 000420 5,110.00 6,320.00 12,500.00 32,668.00 13,748.88 6,022.50 11,745.00 17,774.00 365,880.79 12,055.04 28,368.40 TOTAL CHECKS 512,192.61 ITEM 3 CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 27, 1998 Performance Based Service Management Study RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) Approve amendment with David M. Griffith & Associates for a Performance Based Service Management study in an amount not to exceed $50,000. 2) Appropriate $40,000 from General Fund unreserved fund balance to the Finance Department Consulting budget. DISCUSSION: On February 28, 1995 the City Council awarded a professional services contract to David M. Griffith & Associates, LTD. (DMG) to prepare a Development Impact Fee Study and a User Fee Study. DMG began the work on both of these studies shortly after council approval of their contract. The development impact fee (DIF) study was completed first and for approximately eighteen months staff worked with a development subcommittee to ensure the development community inclusion in the process. Staff is now ready to proceed with the completion of the user fee study. DMG has prepared a partial preliminary draft report. However, staff is recommending that scope of work for the user fee study be expanded to include a Performance Based Service Management (PBSM) study of the City's operations. PBSM is an integrated package consisting of DMG's: 1) Cost Distribution System - develops and allocates central service costs. 2) User Fee Analysis System - determines full cost of all current and potential fee for service activities provided the public. 3) Service Attribute Identification System - determines qualitative aspects of governmental services. This additional analysis will assist the City in determining the efficiency and effectiveness of the services it provides. This study is also in alignment with the City's current Fast Track program and Economic Development Strategy which encourages efficient customer service. R:INORTONL IAGENDA$I$ 7AOENDA IDMOPBSM. AGN 117198 The amount authorized for the original DIF and User Fee study was $105,000. The cost for this amendment No. I to the contract which included the expanded scope of work for the PBSM study is $45,000 plus $5,000 in travel expense. FISCAL IMPACT: An additional appropriation of $40,000 from General Fund Reserves is required to fund this study. Attachments: David M. Griffith & Associates Proposal David M. Griffith & Associates Agreement R:INORTONLI,4GENDA$I97AGENDAiDMGPBSM. AGN 1/7/98 DMG DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Professional Services for the Public Sector 4320 Auburn Boulevard, Suite 2000 Sacramento, California 9S841 916485.8102 Fax: 916485-0111 Ms. Genie Roberts Finance Director City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9003 November 25, 1997 Dear Genie, This proposal responds to your request for a David M. Griffith & Associates Performance Based Service Management (PBSM) study of city operations. PBSM is an integrated package consisting of DMG's: Cost Distribution System - develops and allocations central service costs (Griffith Activity-based Cost System) User Fee Analysis System - determines full cost of all current and potential fee for service activities provided the public (Fee And Service Technical Review) Service Attribute Identification System- determines qualitative aspects of governmental services (PERFORM). BACKGROUND Within the past two years, DMG has provided the City of Temecula with analysis of their overhead costs and user fee activities. Since delivery of those analyses, however, the City has modified operations as a resuk of both population growth and shifting organizational priorities. Many DMG clients update their cost plans annually so as to not under or overcharge for administrative services. Many of our clients update their user fee studies on a three to five year cycle, the former occurring in more rapidly changing environments. As you are aware, DMG has been working closely with local governments, especially in fiscal and organization matters, for over twenty years. We have seen governments reduce costs to the bare bones level, increase revenues to typically the maximum realistically possible, and review alternative service delivery options. The final step is to analyze services in terms of "what, why, and how," then relate that information into measurable goals and specific action. PBSM PROCESS The key to PBSM is to create a body of knowledge leading to management action. The goal is to develop a proactive set of strategic and tactical tools for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of governmental services. At its core are activity-based costs for all fee and non fee services. The management-level analysis includes information concerning: 1. What do services cost? Fee and non fee. Direct cost; indirect costs; cross support costs. David M. Griffith & Associates. ltd. Pro!kssional sen,ices./'or the public sector Proposal to the (Tits, of 7L.:,tccuhl. 2. Who requires the service? The federal or state government, city charter, etc. Can you stop delivering the service? 3. Who is the client for the service? business? developers? special groups? city departments? 4. What is the client looking for as an outcome of the service (customer satisfaction)? 5. Are there private vendors who could supply a similar service? 6. Could the service level be reduced? Is the City providing too high a level of service for what the client can or will pay? 7. What is the servicer relative priority? Is the service mandated, necessary for the health/welfare/safety of the community or organization, or of high/moderate/low benefit? 8. What are realistic benchmarks? 9. IY/3at are realistic and obtainable e~ciency, efj~ctiveness, and productivity measures? 10. lr/3ere is the City now in relationship to issues 8 and 9; where should the City be three years from now? PBSM is not designed to answer all questions or address all issues, only the most important ones. It will, however, identify targets of opportunities for subsequent in-depth analysis. COST OF SERVICE ANAL YSIS DMG will update the City's full cost and OMB A-87 cost plans. All fee and non-fee activities for the central services operations, plus community development and recreation departments will be re-analyzed in terms of full costs, and recovery/subsidy levels. A Community/Organization Impact Matrix will be created displaying who benefits from the service, and what is the relative priority of that service. QUALITATIVE FILTERS For all appropriate activities, secure answers to the questions: who is the client? what are their expectations? Can services be reduced? Are there private vendors who can provide the services? PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT For all appropriate activities, address: standards (benchmarks - internal or external); workload; efficiency (typically a unit measurement, i.e. cost per plan check); effectiveness (typically a percent of a standard or efficiency measurement); productivity (the change in efficiency or effectiveness over time). QUALIFICATIONS DMG is the preeminent firm providing cost/revenue/management issues consulting services to local government. In addition to providing cost and fee (operating and AB 1600) services to the City of Temecula, DMG list among its clients all 58 California counties and over 200 California cities and special districts. DMG is a national consulting firm with 300 professionals. The Western Region is headquartered in Sacramento, with branch offices in Pasadena, Burlingame, and Olympia, Washington. COST/TIME LINE DMG will provide the above services on a time and expense basis with maximum professional services fee of $45,000 plus a maximum of $5,000 in expenses. DMG current David M. Gr~th & Associates, ltd. Professional services for the public sector Proposal to the City of Temecula. staff fees are: vice president- $150/hr., senior manager- $120/hr., manager- $105/hr., senior consultant- $85/hr., consultant- $75/hr. We estimate four months for delivery of the final report, with draft: information available after 2 ½-3 months. As an officer of the corporation, I am empowered to bind the company to this proposal. Very trul Richard L. Pearl Vice president David M. Griffith & Associates, ltd. Professional services for the public sector Proposal to the City of Temecula. CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDED AND RF, STATED AGREENIF~NT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD. DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1995 CONSULTING SERVICES STUDY OF CITY OPERATIONS THI~ AGREFMENT, is made and effective as of December 16, 1997, between the City of Temecula, a Municipal Corporation ("City") and David M. Griffith & Associates, LTD., ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the paxties agree as follows: 1. ~. This Agreement shall commence on December 16, 1997, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 16, 1998, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. ~I~iR_YICF~. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($50,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. -1- c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGRF~EMF~NT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shah not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shah pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shah constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shah have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shah not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shah serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shah have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCU1VIENT,q. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with ~ to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shah maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shah be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shah provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, appraisal information, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer flies, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. Consultant agrees to furnish City with three copies of the City Operations analysis. The documents shall comply with the professional and ethical requirements of the professional organizations of which the Consultant, or anyone employed by the Consultant, is a member. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold hamfiess the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongtiff acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE RlgO_UIREMlg. NTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scor~ of Insurance, Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Offace Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Ernployer's Liability Insurance. (3) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the Vendor's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance, Vendor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or -3- other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. C. Deductibles and Serf-Insured Retentions, Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or serf-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Vendor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expense. de Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. e. Verification of Coverage, Vendor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecthag coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. 10. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent Consultant. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAl. Rlz-gPONSmHJTWAS. The Consultant shall keep itseft informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. c. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shah not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub Consultants, shah not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shah not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. d. Consultant shah promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub Consultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. 15IO_TI.C,F~. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Walk-In Delivery or Courier: 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: David M. Griffith & Associates, LTD. 4320 Auburn Boulevard, Ste. 2000 Sacramento, CA 95841 Phone (916) 485-8102 -5- 14. LI_C.,E]~. At aH times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 15. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMF~NT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEM~NT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 18. AM~NDMI~NT. This Agreement amends and supersedes Professional Services Agreement between the parties dated February 28, 1995. IN WITNESS wmz.~F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEM CULA By Mayor Attest: June S. Greek, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney -6- Consultant David M. Griffith & Associates, LTD. 4320 Auburn Boulevard, Ste. 2000 Sacramento, CA 95841 (916) 485-8102 By. -7- EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORIVIF~ Consultant agrees to perform the following Scope of Services: Consultant shall provide "Performance Based Service Management" (PBSM) study of City operations as outlined in the attached proposal provided by the Consultant. -8- PAYMENT SCHEDULE Consultant shall be paid the sum as outlined in the attached Consultant proposal: Vice President - $150.00 per hour Senior Manager - $120.00 per hour Manager - $105.00 per hour Senior Consultant - $ 85.00 per hour Consultant - $ 75.00 per hour Consultant shall provide services as outlined in this agreement on a time and expense basis, with a maximum professional services fee of $45,000 and a maximum of $5,000 in expenses. The total amount for services rendered shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($~o,ooo.oo). R:\VOLLMUM\AGREEMNT.ALL\DMGPBSM.AGR -9- DMG DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Professional Services for the Public Sector 4320 Auburn Boulevard, Suite 2000 Sacramento, California 95841 916,485.8102 Fax: 916.485.0111 Ms. Genie Roberts Finance Director City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589-9003 November 25, 1997 Dear Genie, This proposal responds to your request for a David M. Griffith & Associates Performance Based Service Management (PBSM) study of city operations. PBSM is an integrated package consisting of DMG's: Cost Distribution System - develops and allocations central service costs (Griffith Activity-based Cost System) User Fee Analysis System - determines full cost of all current and potential fee for service activities provided the public (Fee And Service Technical Review) Service Attribute Identification System - determines qualitative aspects of governmental services (PERFORM). BACKGROUND Within the past two years, DMG has provided the City of Temecula with analysis of their overhead costs and user fee activities. Since deEvery of those analyses, however, the City has modified operations as a resuk of both population growth and shifting organizational priorkies. Many DMG clients update their cost plans annually so as to not under or overcharge for administrative services. Many of our clients update their user fee studies on a three to five year cycle, the former occurring in more rapidly changing environments. As you are aware, DMG has been working closely with local governments, especially in fiscal and organization matters, for over twenty years. We have seen governments reduce costs to the bare bones level, increase revenues to typically the maximum realistically possible, and review alternative service delivery, options. The final step is to analyze services in terms of "what, why, and how," then relate that information into measurable goals and specific action. PBSM PROCESS The key to £BSM is to create a body of knowledge leading to management action. The goal is to develop a proactive set of strategic and tactical tools for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of governmental services. At its core are activity-based costs for all fee and non fee services. The management-level analysis includes information concerning: 1. What do services cost? Fee and non fee. Direct cost; indirect costs; cross support costs. DavM M. Griffith & Associates. ltd. Pro. t~ssional ser~'ices for the public sector Proposal to the (.'itv o.t' 7~'mct','tia. 2. Who requires the service? The federal or state government, city charter, etc. Can you stop delivering the service? 3. Who is the client for the service? business? developers? special groups? city departments? 4. What is the client looking for as an outcome of the service (customer satis:~ction)? 5. Are there private vendors ~vho could supply a similar service? 6. Could the service level be reduced? Is the City providing too high a level of service for what the client can or will pay? What is the service5 relative priority? Is the service mandated, necessary for the health/welfare/safety of the community or organization, or of high/moderate/low benefit? 8. What are realistic benchmarks? 9. What are realistic and obtainable e~ciency, e~ctiveness, and productivity measures? 10. Where is the City now in relationship to issues 8 and 9; where should the City be three years from PBSM is not designed to answer all questions or address all issues, only the most important ones. It will, however, identify targets of opportunities for subsequent in-depth analysis. COST OF SERVICE ANAL YSIS DMG will update the City's full cost and OMB A-87 cost plans. All fee and non-fee activities for the central services operations, plus community development and recreation departments will be re-analyzed in terms of full costs, and recovery/subsidy levels. A Community/Organization Impact Matrix will be created displaying who benefits from the service, and what is the relative priority of that service. QUALITATIVE FILTERS For all appropriate activities, secure answers to the questions: who is the client? what are their expectations? Can services be reduced? Are there private vendors who can provide the services? PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT For all appropriate activities, address: standards (benchmarks - internal or external); workload; efficiency (typically a unit measurement, i.e. cost per plan check); effectiveness (typically a percent of a standard or efficiency measurement); productivity (the change in efficiency or effectiveness over time). QUALIFICATIONS DMG is the preeminent firm providing cost/revenue/management issues consuking services to local government. In addition to providing cost and fee (operating and AB 1600) services to the City of Temecula, DMG list among its clients all 58 California counties and over 200 California cities and special districts. DMG is a national consulting firm with 300 professionals. The Western Region is headquartered in Sacramento, with branch offices in Pasadena, Burlingame, and Olympia, Washington. COST/TIME LINE DMG will provide the above services on a time and expense basis with maximum professional services fee of $45,000 plus a maximum of $5,000 in expenses. DMG current David M. Griffith & Associates, lid. Professional services for the public sector Proposal to the City of Ternecula. staff fees are: vice president- $150/hr., senior manager- $120/hr., manager- $105/hr., senior consukant - $85/hr., consultant- $75/hr. We estimate four months for delivery of the final report, with draft information available after 2 ½-3 months. As an officer of the corporation, I am empowered to bind the company to this proposal. Very trul. you~... Richard L. Pearl Vice president David M. Griffith & Associates, lid. Professional services for the public sector Proposal to the City of Temecula. ITEM 4 .. .. CITY ATTORNEY~~'~.~ DIRECTOR OF CITY MANAGER..,~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE: January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: 1998 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve renewing the annual agreement with California Compensation (CALComp) for the City's Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance, subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney. BACKGROUND: The City staff continues to be impressed with Cal Comp's commitment to the best possible service as demonstrated over the past two years. CAL Comp's staff has been conscientious and consistently demonstrated their dedication to what is best for the City and its employees. CALComp is the fifth largest writer of workers' compensation coverage in California, and is an admitted carrier with a rating of A-VIII. The 1998 Plan Year (2/01/98 - 1/31/99) quotes, provided by our benefit broker Mike Bush of Cal Surance, are as follows: CALComp $70.096 State Fund ~8 I, 548 UniCare $86,378 #The State Fund quote allows the City the opportunity to possibly receive a dividend return only if our claim experience for the 1998 policy year is outstanding. Staff is very pleased with CAL Comp's 1998 quote and believes it reflects CAL Comp's positive relationship with the City along with their approval of our Loss Prevention Program, under the leadership of the City's Safety Committee. This premium reduction is even more impressive, as the City's payroll has increased, due to normal merit salary progression, from the previous plan year. In addition, the experience modification (determined by the relationship of City claim costs to industry-wide standards) has decreased from 123% to 116%. R:~tNIERDA~R.EPORTWI'AFF50.MIS 1/20/~ Based on the above listed quotes and the quality of the services received; staff recommends the renewal of coverage with CALComp, for the 1998 Plan Year. FISCAL IMPACT: The CALComp quote is saving the City a total of $4,859 for the upcoming 1998 Plan Year. Adequate funds are available in the operating budget to fund this policy. __ CAL-SURANCE PROPOSAL OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE INCEPTING: 02-01-98 Presented b_~: Michael Bush Sr. Vice President/Account Executive January 14,1998 333 City Boulevard West, Orange, CA 92668 P.O. Box 7048, Orange, CA 92613-7048 JP:cm.014.1 (1-98) 714-939-0800 714-939-1654 Fax INTRODUCTION TO CAL-SURANCE Cal-Surance Associates, Inc., a member of the Cal-Surance Group, is a full service insurance brokerage. Specializing in Municipal and Commercial Property, Casualty and Workers' Compensation Insurance and Risk Management Services, Cal-Surance represents you, our Clients. Founded in 1962, we are currently ranked as the 49th largest broker in the country, and the largest independently owned agency/broker in California. Our philosophy is client oriented. We strive to provide our customers with comprehensive programs to properly confront their exposures to loss, through: Insurance contracts with the best available companies, with the best available conditions, at the lowest possible cost. Risk Management techniques to transfer, reduce and control exposures and their cost. Our final goal is to reduce the ultimate net cost of risk for our clients and to provide services in a professional manner. You are professionals in your field as we are professionals in ours. By using Cal- Surance to assist in developing and maintaining your insurance program you will free up your resources and add to the expertise needed for maximum efficiency and economy. JP:cm.014.2 (1-98) SERVICE PERSONNEL CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. SERVICE PERSONNEL for THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE Michael G. Bush Office Direct Line (714)939-7453 Office (714)939-0800 Home (714)998-7479 SENIOR ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR Judy Pavlik Office Direct Line: (714)939-7455 Office: (714)939-0800 ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR Rose David Office Direct Line: (714)939-7458 Office: (714)838-0800 Address 333 City Boulevard West Orange, CA 92668 P.O. Box 7048 Orange, CA 92613 Fax (714)939-1654 JP:cm.014.3 (1-98) WORKERS' COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION Your experience modification for the current year 1998, February 1st is 116%. THIS MODIFICATION HAS BEEN DEVELOPED BY THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE RATING BUREAU BASED UPON YOUR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS EXPERIENCE FOR THE FOLLOWING YEARS: 1996 1995 1994 JP:cm014.4 (1-98) MARKETS APPROACHED BY CAL-SURANCE Insurance Company Coverages Status 1. California Compensation Workers' Compensation Quotation provided. 2. State Compensation Insurance Fund Workers' Compensation Indication Provided 3. Unicare Insurance Company Workers' Compensation Indication Provided 4. American Home Assurance Company Workers' Compensation Unwilling to quote at under $100,000 premium. JP:crn.014.5 (1-98) AREAS OF MAJOR CONCERN (Addressed by Cal-Surance and California Compensation Insurance Company) 1. Senate Bill #198 Compliance (Continuous Audit) 2. Safety Committee Attendance (Discuss) A. California Compensation Loss Control Support B. Film Library Available C. Attendance by Cal-Surance and Carrier Loss Control 3. Written Safety Program (Review and Update) 4. Reserve Reviews (Frequency as Desired) . Claims Record Keeping A. Ease of Reporting (Fax Link) B. Exchange of Information 1. Fax Link for Claim Status Reports 2. In-House Claims Modem for review of individual claim file detail (adjuster notes and plans of action). . Claims Adjuster Case Load- 150 Indemnity A. 12 Year Veteran Adjuster JP:cm.014.6 (1-98) CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY I. Best's Rating and Financial Size: A-:VIII, Admitted (Owned by Foundation Health) II. Location: Orange, CA (Home Office, Novato, CA) IIi. Strong Points: Loss Prevention, California Workers' Compensation Specialty Company, Claims Review Scheduling, 2nd Largest Writer of Workers' Compensation in California. IV. Review Services Per Areas of Major Concern Section JP:crn.014.7 (1-98) Ie PROPOSAL CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY 02-01-98/02-01-99 POLICY PERIOD ESTIMATED ANNUAL PREMIUM ONE YEAR - NON PARTICIPATING PLAN Classification Code Payroll Rate Premium Municipal (non-manual) 9410 $2,572,540 2.48 $63,799 Municipal (all other) 9420 $421,752 9.32 $39,307 Clerical 8810 $1,912,024 .86 $16,443 $119,549 Modification: x 1.16 Modified Premium: $138,677 Premium Modifier: x .5055 Total Premium: $70,096 California Admn. & Fraud Assessment: + 366 Payment Terms Net Billing Rates 10% Down Monthly Installments or Audits (Discuss) Code Rate 9410 1.45 9420 5.47 8810 .50 Note: Comparison using 1998 payroll estimates. Premium using 1997 rates and modification = $82,172 Premium using 1997 rates and 1998 modification = $77,495 JP:cm.014.8 (1-98) II. PROPOSAL -- STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (INDICATION) Premium: $81,548 (plus California Admin. & Fraud) III. PROPOSAL- UNICARE INSURANCE COMPANY (INDICATION) Premium: $86,378 (plus California Admin. & Fraud) IV. PROPOSAL- AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY Unwilling to quote under $100,000 in premium. JP:cm.014.9 (1-98) ITEM 5 FINANCE DIRECTO)~.,, ./~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: Authorize Teml~orary Street Closures for Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event in Old Town. (Front Street, and related streets, between Moreno Street and First Street) PREPARED BY:~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1998 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENTS. BACKGROUND: The Annual Rod Run necessitates the physical closure of certain streets in the Old Town area, and related detouring, to accommodate and provide the 'Street Scene" ambience that allows the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential vehicular-pedestrian conflicts. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "RegulationS0f Highways," local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. r:\agdrpt\98~O127\rodruncl.o~e AKC/330 The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the Temecula Rod Run l gg8 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town Association. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. This years Rod Run Event sponsors propose street closures as follows: Front Street between Moreno Road (E) to 1st Street from 5:00am to 4:00pm on both Saturday and Sunday, February 14th and 15th; 5th Street, 4th Street, Main Street, 3rd Street, and 2nd Street between Front Street and Mercedes Street, and Main Street from Front Street to the southwesterly side of the Main Street Bridge from 5:00am Saturday to 4:00pm Sunday; 6th Street to be closed southwesterly of the City Parking Lot to Front Street within the same time limits in order to provide Bus access/departure from the City Parking Lot. Some partial closures, as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for 'Block Parties" on cul-de-sac streets only, have not been submitted for City Council action in order to reduce the impact on City Council and staff time. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Any public police services required for these events will be negotiated by the Police Department and sponsor(s), and the sponsor(s) will be responsible for such service costs. Public Works Department .provision of signing, barricading, and services related thereto are also the sponsor's financial responsibility. Attachments: Resolution No. 98- . Resolution No. 91-96. Location Map r:\~gdrpt\98~0127~xlruncl.oee AKC/3~O RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLU~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES FOR TEMECULA ROD RUN 1998 EVENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY F_~GINEER TO ISSUE PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town Association, for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event: and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close public streets for the Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event: and, NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the Temecula Rod Run 1998 Event sponsored by the Temecula Town Association, and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~r), that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Temecula ROd Run 1998 Event, and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council. PASSIgr), APPROV!~, AND ADOPT!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor r:\~gdrpt\98~0127~drunol.o~e AKC/330 ATrEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TF. btF~ULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of January 1998, by the following vote: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\98~0127\rodruncl.o~e AKC/330 RESOLUTION NO. 91-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, SIDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY WHEREAS, certain groups and individuals frequently desire to conduct parades and certain other special enterprises, activities, and events on public roads, sidewalks, and public rights of way in the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to maintain an orderly, fair and expeditious process for controlling and regulating these events consistent with the protection of public property and the promotion of its best and most beneficial public use; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RF~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. S_oecial Events means any event consisting of twenty-five (25) or more persons or animals or a combination thereof on foot, bicycle, or vehicle, located on any street, highway, sidewalk, or public right of way, including, but not limited to any parade, march, ceremony, run, race, walk, meet, or procession. SECTION 2. The following procedures shall be followed for the issuance of special event permits: A. The sponsor of such Special Event shall meet and confer with the City Traffic Engineer regarding the Special Event and the effect, if any, on the city. B. Application for a permit to hold a Special Event shall be made on forms provided by the City and approved by the City Engineer. The application shall include a detailed description of the proposed special event, including but not limited to the following: 1. The name and address of the applicant, and if the same be a corporation, the names of its principal officers, or if the same be partnership, association, organization or fictitious company, the names of the partners or persons comprising the , association, organization or company with the address and telephone number of each; 2. The number of persons anticipated to be participating in the event; 3. Purpose of the event; 4. The date, hours, and precise location where the event is to be held; $. The amount of any spectator, participant, entry, or other fee, if any, to be charged in connection with the event; 3/Resos 91-96 -1- $eptembee Ill, 1991 6. Type and nature of any vehicles, equipment, or other apparatus to be used in connection with the event; 7. The number and amplifying range of any sound amplifying systems to be used in connection with the event; 8. Type of goods, wares, merchandise, food, or beverages to be sold or otherwise provided to persons at the event; 9. The name and business address of any vendors who will be participating in the event shall be provided 24 hours prior to the event date. 10. Security plan for event. The application shall be signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury and shall contain and an agreement whereby the applicant agrees to fully compensate the City for any damage to public property, as well as to clean and otherwise restore the event site to the condition in which it existed prior to the conduct of the event. C. A 'major" Special Event shall be defined as one involving one hundred (100) or more persons or requiring change~ in normal traffic patterns regardless of the number of persons involved. Applications for major events shall be filed 60 days prior to the date of the event. In the case of a Major Special Event, the application for the Special Event Permit shall include a traffic control plan and a traffic study. The following elements shall be included in the tra~c study: 1. A fact sheet and time line. 2. Maps of the parade, bike or mn courses, if applicable, which shall include both overview maps and detailed layouts. 3. Descriptions of the parade, bike or run courses. 4. A traffic flow and diversion plan. " 5. A street and highway closure schedule, and a plan for notification to every residence and business located on a street or highway subject to closure or detour due to the special event. 6. A listing of all affected intersections, and a traffic control diagram(s). 7. A brief narrative describing course control, the set-up clean-up for the special event, the manner and relations for the special event, all parking requirements, the necessary medical support system, the manner of radio communications, and all insurance documentation. 8. Any and all mitigation measures applicable to the special event and available to the special event and available to lessen the impact on traffic access and safety. 9. An executive summary of the special event. 10. The traffic control plan shall be prepared in accordance with the "State Manual of Trat'fic Controls for Construction Maintenance Work Zones". Such Traffic Controls Plans shall be produced on reproducible sheets (24" X 36"). 3/R~sos 91-96 -2- $epiember 16, 1991 D. The sponsorsshall be required to submit an application accompanied by a base fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00). The cost of services in excess of the base fee shall be detailed and charged upon final approval or denial of the permit. E. Prior to the issuance of a permit, the sponsor shall submit to the City proof of public liability and property damage insurance, including products liability coverage, written by an insurance company acceptable ~o the City in the limits set forth below, naming the City as an additional insured; and the City require execution of a hold harmless agreement, indemnifying the City for any personal injury or property damage arising from such special event. Public liability and property damage insurance shall be required in the following amount: $1,000,000.00 F. The sponsor shall be required to meet with the Police Department, Fire Department and the City Traffic Engineer to discuss the results of the traffic study and to review the prepared Traffic Control Plan. The Police Chief or his designee may require additional Police Staff for the event in addition to the City Staff normally on duty. Any cost for such additional Police Staff shall be paid by the applicant sponsoring the event. The rate of cost will be based upon the current fiscal year extra duty rate. The City Engineer shall determine if the traffic plan provides for sufficient barricades, warning, and directional signs and any other factors for safely closing the street for a temporary period of time. He/she shall also estimate the amount of City equipment and personnel hours that will be required to perform the work. Cost for additional staff and equipment is in addition to any filing fee required. Such amounts may be waived by the Council upon a finding that is in the best .interest of the City to do .so. O. If the Traffic Engineer, in his discretion, recommends approval of both the Traffic Control Plan and the Traffic Study to the City Engineer, the City Engineer shall submit a copy of both documents to the Planning Director for review and comment. Fl. Following Planning Director review and comments, the City Engineer may approve the application for the Special Event Permit. Approval or denial of the application shall be made by the City Traffic Engineer. The applicant shall be notified within five (5) days in writing of the decision of the City Engineer. I. As a condition to issuing a Permit, the City Engineer may impose reasonable terms and regulations concerning the time and place of such event; the area and manner of conducting such event; the maximum number of persons participating therein;l the regulation of traffic, if required, including the number and type of signs and barricades to be provided by the applicant, if any, together with a plan of their disposition following the event; permissible decibel levels; and such other requirements as the Engineer may find reasonable and necessary for the protection of persons and property. 3/Resos 91-96 -3- September 16, 1991 Issuance of any Special Event Permit shall be conditioned on and subject to the right of the City Engineer to summarily cancel, restrict, or modify such Permit in order to facilitate or accommodate any other duly approved or permitted special event, celebration, or activity. The City Engineer shall mail to the applicant a notice of such cancellation, restriction, or modification no later than thirty (30) days prior to the special event and shall take reasonable and appropriate actions to reduce, minimize, or reasonable and appropriate actions to reduce, minimize, or eliminate any inconvenience, hardship, or burden as may result from such cancellation, restriction or modification. $. An application for a Special Event Permit may be denied on any of the following grounds: 1. The applicant has failed or refused to provide the City with the information referenced in the above or any other information requested by the City which is reasonably related to the conduct of the proposed event; 2. The applicant has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the application for a permit; 3. The building, structure, equipment or location of such special event does not comply with or fails to meet applicable health, zoning, fire or safety requirements imposed by law; 4. The activity or location of the activity is such as to unreasonably limit, obstruct, or curtail the free flow of traffic on any public street or sidewalk; 5. The applicant has filed to comply with any of the conditions imposed pursuant to Section I. 6. The conduct of the special event will unreasonably interfere with the public peace, health, safety or welfare; 7. The applicant refuses to agree to or abide or comply with all conditions and regulations attendant to issuance of the permit. The City Engineer or City Clerk shall notify the applicant in writing as to the reasons for denial of any application for a permit. K. Upon approval of the permit application, the City Engineer shall so notify the following; 1. Police Department; 2. Fire Department; 3. Public Services Department; 4. Risk Manager; 5. City Manager; 6. Community Services District L. A Special Event Permit issued hereunder may be summarily suspended or 3/Reao~ 91-96 4.. September 16, 1991 revoked by the City Engineer at any time when he/she haz reason to believe that: 1. Any of the gwunds exist for which the original permit application could have been denied or 2. The health, safety, or welfare of persons or property would be endangered because of real or threatened disaster, public calamity, dot or other emergency; or 3. The event is or will significantly or materially deviate from the t~rma of the proposed event as described in the permittee's application or in supplemental information provided to the committee; or 4. The permittee is or will be unable to satisfy any condition of the permit. Notice of such suspension or revocation shall be made in writing to the applicant. M. Any decision made pursuant to Section H may bc appealed to the City Manager. The appeal made by the applicant or by ten or more persons potentially aggrieved by the issuance of the permit. Such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk no less than thirty (30) days before the proposed commencement date of the special event. The City Clerk shall forward copies of the appeal to the City Manager and the City Engineer, who shall submit to the City Manager a report on the ca~e appealed. The City Manager shall consider the appeal at a hearing. Written notice of the time and place the City Manager will consider the appeal shall be mailed by the City Clerk to the persons who filed their appeal at least ten (10) days before the date set for hearing unless the applicant shall waive notice in writing. In any appeal, the City Manager shall consider the application, the report of the case submitted by the City Engineer and other per~nent information. The decision of the City Manager shall be final. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSF~I~, APPROVRr~ AND ADOPTED, this 10th day of September, 1991. ATTEST: Ronald I. Parks, Mayor Greek, City Clerk (st=aLl 3/Rcao~ 91-96 -5- Sepiatabor 16, 1991 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I ttF.,REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of September, 1991 by the following vote of the council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Lindemarts, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILEMBERS: None Ju . Gree~ 3/Resos 91-96 -6- September 16, 1991 · I I l r-I TEMECU~.,~ ~. co~u~~ ',., R R rl Location Map NOTE: MAP NOT TO SCALE ITEM 6 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECT(~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official January 27, 1998 Street Name Change from Green Meadow Rd. To Kahwea Rd. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF GREEN MEADOW ROAD TO KAHWEA ROAD' DISCUSSION: Staff has received a request from Meadowview Pointe, LLC, owner of Tract 21818, requesting that the street name Green Meadow Road, be changed to Kahwea Road. Meadowview Pointe, LLC, is the sole property owner of the property affected by this request. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula was notified by Riverside County's 9-1-1 informing us there currently exists a Green Meadow Rd. in an area of Riverside County and felt this may cause confusion in the event of an emergency situation. FISCAL IMPACT: None R:\BROCKMEI~AGENDA\KAWHEA.WPD 1/16/98 cb RESOLUTION NO. 9~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF GREEN MEADOW ROAD TO KAHWEA ROAD The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, Section 34091.1 and 34081.1 and 34092 of the Government Code provides for changing the name of a public street, and; WHEREAS, the developer, Meadowview Point, LLC has applied under the provisions of the Government Code to change the name of Green Meadow Road to Kahwea Road, to be consistent with the area theme, and in conjunction with a request from Riverside County 9-1-1, and; WHEREAS, there are no affected property owners as these lots are currently being developed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula determines and orders that the name of Green Meadow Road be changed to Kahwea Road. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. ;Iones, Deputy City Clerk, CMC STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk, CMC MEADOWVIEW POINTE, LLC. 3924 Con~ordia Lane Fallbrook, CA 92028 (760) 723-3803 January 9, 1998 Mr. Anthony' J. Elmo Chief Building Official City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P, O. Box 9033 Temeeula, CA 92589-9033 Re: Tract 21818, Meadowview Pointe, LLC Dear Mr. Elmo:' I, Dale Buzza, Manager-Member (owner) of the above referenced Meadowview Pointe, LLC do request a street name change as follows: Green Meadow Road to be changed to Kahwea Road~ This change was suggested and requested by the County of'Riverside, 9-I-I, and does not affect any neighbors. If you need any further information, please call me at the number above. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sincerely, Dale Buzza Manager-Member Meadowview Pointe, LLC ITEM 7 APPROVii~Jr.' . ~-."-'~ CITY ATTORNEY ~/~ ./~/~ FINANCE DIRECTOR ~ ~ CITY MANAGER ~.~' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/City Council Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: Contract for Grant Funding through the Department of Water Resources, Urban Streams Restoration Program PREPARED BY: ~ Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING CONTRACT FOR AN URBAN STREAMS RESTORATION GRANT FOR THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS, AND DESIGNATING CONTRACT MANAGER AND FISCAL AGENT DISCUSSION: In 1993, the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment (URGE) approached the City of Temecula to ascertain if the City would be interested in co-sponsoring a creek improvement project within the City. Subsequently, a project to improve the creek in the Rancho California Sports Park was selected and the City co-sponsored two Urban Streams Restoration grant applications with URGE. Both grants were approved by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in an amount of $50,000 each. The City awarded a design contract for the creek restoration project and the $50,000 from the first grant was received from the DWR to reimburse the City for some of the design costs of the project. The ultimate project description and design was modified based upon information received during the investigation stage of design. The final project met the requirements of the grant while providing needed creek stabilization and erosion control within the creek and its banks. The City Council awarded a construction contract for the creek improvements on April 23, 1996. The project has been completed and accepted by the City; the Notice of Completion, dated October 7, 1997 has been filed with the Office of the County Recorder. A representative from the DWR has visited the site and inspected the restoration work. Because the work was modified from the original proposal, the DWR has requested that a new Resolution be adopted by the City Council and a new contract be signed for acceptance of the second $50,000 grant. Upon approval of those documents, staff will complete the final grant package and submit all of the information to the DWR for reimbursement from the second grant for our project. FISCAL IMPACT: Grant fund revenues to the City is in an amount of $50,000. This $50,000 grant would reimburse the City for a portion of the construction costs for the creek restoration project and would be available for future capital improvement projects. Attachments: Resolution Contract with Department of Water Resources r: \rusep\agendas\dwrgrant. cc RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING CONTRACT FOR AN URBAN STREAMS RESTORATION GRANT FOR THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS, AND DESIGNATING CONTRACT MANAGER AND FISCAL AGENT WItEREAS, the Califomia Department of Water Resources ("DWR"), Division of Local Assistance, Urban Streams Restoration Program has announced the availability of funds for grants; and WHEREAS, said grants are intended to help solve flooding and erosion problems in a way that provides environmental enhancement; and WHEREAS, the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment (URGE) and the City of Temecula (City) have identified and completed improvements to the channel in the Rancho California Sports Park under an approved DWR grant application; and WHEREAS, URGE has cosponsored the grant application with the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, the environmental review documentation has been prepared and the City has concluded the project is environmentally beneficial; and WHEREAS, the environmental documentation and any required mitigation measures were completed prior to beginning any corrective activities; and WHEREAS, the DWR has reviewed and inspected the completed project and has grant funds available to reimburse the City and URGE for the grant amount. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Temecula approves the joint contract with the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment for an Urban Streams Restoration Program grant and authorizes the Mayor to sign the final contract for reimbursement for administration of the project and designates the Finance Director to submit invoices to the DWR for activities carried out under the work plan for the grant contract. Section 2. The City authorizes the Mayor to accept the grant funds. p:\rusep\reso\urge97.dwr 1 Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. this PASSED, APPROVF~D, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula ~ day of , 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ~ day of , 1998, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk p:\rusep\reso\urge97.dwr 2 Agreement No. V-70015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES AND the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment and the City of Temecula UNDER THE URBAN CREEK RESTORATION AND FLOOD CONTROL ACT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on December 1, 1997 between the Department of Water Resources of the State of California, hereinafter called the State, and the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment and the City of Temecula hereinafter called the Grantees, which parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Contract is to provide Urban Creek Restoration Program grant funds for the planning and/or execution of a watershed stabilization and flood damage reduction project, as provided for by California Water Code Section 7048. 2. Grant Funds. Grantees agree to use the grant funds received in accordance with the terms specified in this contract and pursuant to the River Parkway Program of the Safe Clean, Reliable Water Supply Act (California Water Code Section 78682 et seq., Division 24, Chapter 6, Article 6). 3. Grant Amount. Subject to the availability of funds, the State shall provide a grant in the amount of $50,000.00 to the Grantees to assist in financing the urban creek protection, restoration and enhancement project to be carded out as described in paragraph 4 below. 4. Grantees Responsibilities: A. The Grantees shall implement on-site work to be performed as specified in the attached Work Plan developed by the Grantees' Project Manager with the assistance of the Project Manager(s) for the State. This Work Plan is a part of this Contract. B. The Grantees shall develop a program to manage streambank stabilization, stream channel environment and watershed for the purpose of reducing damages from erosion and/or floods and improving the environmental values of the dpadan environment. Development of this management program is provided for in the attached Work Plan. C. Grantees are solely responsible for design, construction, operation and maintenance of the project. Review or approval of plans, specifications, bid documents or other construction documents by the. State is solely for the purpose of proper administration of grant funds by the State and shall not be deemed to relieve or restrict the Grantees' responsibility. Any planning and design assistance provided to the Grantees by the State is provided pursuant to California Water Code Section 7048 and is not governed by the terms of this Contract. Agreement No. V-70015 5. Report. Upon completion of the project, the Grantees shall submit a wdtten report which contains: (1) a description of conditions before the project was executed, (2) a description of the restoration and planning techniques used, (3) a description of the results of the project, and (4) an analysis of the techniques used. The report must include photographs of planning and restoration activities and techniques. 6. Term of Contract. The term of this Contract will begin on December 1, 1997 and extend through December 31, 1998 At the State's discretion, Grantee's may request an extension of time by providing a wdtten explanation of need and asking for a contract amendment. The maximum pedod for any contract will include the year of encumbrance plus two additional years. 7. Maintenance. The Grantees agree to maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilitated or restored with the grant funds provided in this agreement in perpetuity. The Grantees or its successors may, with the approval of the State, transfer this responsibility to maintain and operate the property. 8. CEQA Compliance/Permits. Pdor to disbursement of implementation funds under this Contract, the Grantees shall comply with all applicable requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Califomia Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and other applicable federal, State and local laws, rules and regulations. 9. Project Managers. The_pro. je~t~manager for the State is Sara Denzler. The project manager for the Grantees is Rerberr. Y. 5m].cn ,. and the person designated to submit the Grantees' claims is' City o]: 'l~'mecuia u'znance b].rector · 10. Project Oversight. The Department may inspect the project at any reasonable time to ensure it is being carded out in accordance with the work plan or to ensure that it is being properly maintained. Dudng the administration of this contract, the Department may also request additional available technical, financial,~ hydrologic, bioengineedng, soil and water quality, environmental, water dghts, legal analyses and justifications, and other relevant information to ensure the project is being carded out in accordance with this contract. 11. Method of Payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of an invoice in triplicate, in arrears by the Department of Water Resources, P.O. Box 942836, Sacramento, California 94236-0001, Attention: Sara Denzler, 1020 9th Street, Third Floor. Invoices should include Contract number and Work Plan element identification. 12. Payment Retention· The State reserves the dght to withhold from payment up to 10 percent of the value of the submitted invoices per Public Contracts Code Section 10346 until it is satisfied that the project being financed by this grant is completed. It is understood that payment(s) may be withheld until a report summarizing project results is received and found satisfactory by the State. Contractor may substitute securities for such retention as stipulated by Government Code Section 4590 and shall receive any interest thereon. 13. Standard Provisions. Exhibit A, containing standard provisions, is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, Agreement No. V-70015 Approved as to Legal Form and Sufficiency: STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES By Chief Counsel Department of Water Resources P.O. Box 942836 Sacramento, CA 94236-0001 Grantee Union for a River Greenbelt Environment Address 42545 Kalmia By Chief of the Division of Planning and Local Assistance Signature Murrieta, CA 92562 Co-Sponsor City of Temecula By Signature Ron Roberts Address P.o. Box 9033 Title Mayor Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attachments Agreement No. V-70015 Exhibit A State'of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES STANDARD CLAUSES A-1. Worker's Compensation Clause Grantees affirm that they are aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and Grantees affirms that they will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work under this Contract. Grantees will make its contractors and subcontractors aware of this provision and determine that they have complied with it before commencing work on the project. Volunteer laborers are exempt from the worker's compensation provisions of the California Labor Code. A-2. Claims Dispute Clause · Any claims that Grantees may have regarding the performance of this agreement, including but not limited to claims for additional compensation or an extension of time, shall be submitted to the Director, Department of Water Resources, within thirty days of its accrual. State and Grantees shall then attempt to negotiate a resolution of such claims and process an amendment to this agreement to implement the terms of any such resolution. A-3. National Labor Relations Board Clause In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10296, Grantees declare under penalty of perjury that no more than one final, unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Grantees within the immediately preceding two-year pedod because of Grantees' failure to comply with an order of a federal court which orders Grantees to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. A-4. Nondiscrimination Clause During the performance of this Contract, the Grantees, their contractors and subcontractors shall not deny the Contract's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, physical or mental disability, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, age (over 40) or sex. Grantees shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. Grantees, their contractors and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Govemment Code Section 12900 et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (California Administrative Code, Title 2 Sections 7285.0 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Govemment Code Sections 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the awarding State agency to implement such article. Agreement No. V-70015 Exhibit A Grantees, their contractors and subcontractors shall give wdtten notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. Grantees shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Contract. Grantees, their contractors and subcontractors shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the awarding State agency upon reasonable notice at any time dudng the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or Agency shall require to ascertain compliance with this clause. The Grantees' signature on this Contract shall constitute a certification under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Grantees have, unless exempted, complied with the nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Code of Regulations Section 8103. A-5. State to be Held Harmless The Grantees agree to indemnify the State of Califomia, Department of Water Resources and its officers, agents and employees against and to hold the same free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, costs, expenses or liability due or incident to, either in whole or in part, and whether directly or indirectly, the project. A-6. Compliance With Laws, Regulations, Permit Requirements The Grantees shall at all times comply with, and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with, all applicable federal and State laws, rules and regulations, permits and all applicable local ordinances, specifically including but not limited to environmental, procurement and safety laws, rules, regulations, permits and ordinances. A-7. Successors and Assigns This Contract and all of its provisions shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. No assignment or transfer of this Contract or any part hereof, rights hereunder or interest herein by the Grantees shall be valid unless and until it is approved by the State and made subject to such reasonable terms and conditions as the State may impose. A-8. Audit Requirement Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 8546.7, the contracting parties shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State and the State Auditor General for a pedod of three years after final payment under this Contract with respect to all matters connected with the performance of this Contract, including but not limited to the cost of administering this Contract. All records of the Grantees shall be preserved for this purpose for at least three years after completion of the project. Agreement No. V-70015 Exhibit A A-9. Inspections The State shall have the dght to inspect the work being performed at any and all reasonable times dudng the term of the Contract. This dght shall extend to any subcontracts, and Grantees shall include provisions ensuring such access in all its contracts or subcontracts entered into pursuant to its Contract with the State. The State shall have the dght to inspect the project site at any and all reasonable times after completion of the project to ensure compliance with paragraphs I and 7 of the Contract. During regular office hours, each of the parties shall have the dght to inspect and to make copies of any books, records, or reports of the other party relating to this Contract. Each of the parties shall maintain and shall make available at all times for such inspection accurate records of all of its cost, disbursements and receipts with respect to its activities under this Contract. A-10. Performance Evaluation Contractor's performance under this Contract will be evaluated after completion. A-11. Contracting Officer of the State The contracting office of the State shall be the Chief of the Division of Local Assistance of the Department of Water Resources of the State of California and his successors, or their duly authorized representatives. The contracting officer shall be responsible for all discretionary acts, opinions, judgments, approvals, reviews and determinations required by the State under the terms of this Contract. A-12. Remedies Not Exclusive The use by either party of any remedy specified herein for the enforcement of this Contract is not exclusive and shall not depdve the party using such remedy of, or limit the application of, any other remedy provided by law. A-13. Amendments This Contract may be amended in wdting by mutual agreement of the parties. Any request by the Grantees for amendments must be in wdting, stating the amendment request and the reason for the request. The Grantees shall make requests in a timely manner and in no event less than 60 days before the effective date of the amendment. A-14. Waiver of Rights it is the intention of the parties hereto that from time to time either party may waive any of its dghts under this Contract unless contrary to law. Any waiver by either party hereto of rights adsing in connection with this Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver with respect to any other dghts or matters. Agreement No. V-70015 Exhibit A A-15. Notices All notices that are required either expressly or by implication to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be signed for the State by its contracting officer and for the Grantees by such officers as from time to time they may authorize in wdting to so act. All such notices shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or if enclosed in a properly addressed, postage- prepaid envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail. A-16. Ownership and Use of Photographs, Audio and/or Video Recordings and other Publications. Grantees shall provide the Department with reasonable access to all odginal photographic materials, audio and video recordings of work funded by this grant, and authorizes the Department to use any part or all of the photographic materials, master audio and master video recordings for the Department's purposes. Grantees shall make available to the Department for it's review and comment a copy of any completed publication, brochure, video or audio tape produced in whole or in part with funds from this grant pdor to releasing it to parties other than the Grantees and Grantees' subcontractors. No release of such materials shall be made without the joint approval of the Department and the Grantees. Approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. A-17. Drug Free Workplace Certification. By signing this contract, the Contractor or grantee hereby certifies under penalty or perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor or grantee will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions: , Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying action to be taken against employees for violations. . Establish Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about all of the following: (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace. (b) The person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, (c) Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs, and (d) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Every employee who works on the proposed contract or grant: (a) Will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement, and (b) Will agree to abide by terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the contract or grant. Agreement No. V-70015 Exhibit A A-18. Americans With Disabilities Act. By signing this contract, Contractor assures the State that it complies with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. A-19. Conflict of Interest. 1. Current State Employees: (a) No State officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity or enterprise from which the officer or employee receives compensation 'or has a financial interest and which is sponsored or funded by any State agency, unless the . employment, activity or enterprise is required as a condition of regular State employment. (b) No State officer or employee shall contract on his or her own behalf as an independent contractor with any State agency to provide goods or services. 2. Former State Employees: (a) For a two-year period from the date he or she left State employment, no former State officer or employee may enter into a contract in which he or she engaged in any of the negotiation, transactions, planning, arrangements or any part of the decision-making process relevant to the contract while employed in any capacity by any State agency. (b) For a twelve-month period from the date he or she left State employment, no former State officer or employee may enter into a contract with any State agency if he or she was employed by that State agency in a policy-making position in the same general subject area as the proposed contract within the twelve-month pedod pdor to his or her leaving State service. ITEM 8 CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGE~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services January 27, 1998 Membership in the Riverside County Waste Management District Resources PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING APPLICATION TO JOIN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DISCUSSION: On December 9, 1997, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors considered a staff report analyzing the potential impacts of the dissolution of the Waste Resources Management District ('District"), reorganizing that entity as a County Department. Establishment of the District was completed in 1993 through Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO") action, with the Board of Supervisors acting as the District Board of Directors. The District is governed by Health and Safety Code regulations. County staff's report points out several reasons for the original creation of the District, among them the insulation of the County General Fund from future solid waste costs and debt repayment, creation of a long-term financing structure, and the formation of a framework to encourage participation by cities in the solid waste management system. The report goes on to analyze the pros and cons of leaving the District structure intact or dissolving it and making it a County Department again. Upon the completion of the analysis, County staff concluded that there was no reason to reorganize the District at this time. Staff's finding is located on page 11 of the analysis and states, 'Determination of the Analyses: Analyses of the 13 key issues surrounding the dissolution of the WRMD, which included revisiting several of the formation issues, indicated the dissolution may be inappropriate at this time. The analysis indicated that without clear and specific identification of benefit to the General Fund and considering that the WRMD appears to be functioning well, dissolving it and reorganizing it as a County department is likely to be more detrimental than beneficial to funding in general. Also, there could be serious enough damage to the County's credibility to have long- term negative impact upon the MSW (municipal solid waste) system.' On August 16, 1994, the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ('MOU') with the two Riverside County Councils of Government ('COGs') establishing guidelines for Riverside cities to annex into and become members of the District. Annexation into a sanitation district is also provided for in the Health and Safety Code. The MOU also provides for the Board of Supervisors and the COGs to review governance structure upon the consideration of an annexation into the District. Recently, several Western Riverside Cities have expressed interest in joining the District. In fact, five Cities, Corona, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, and San Jacinto, have adopted Resolutions of Intention to apply for annexation. Five other cities, Beaumont, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Moreno Valley, and Perris, have taken a formal action, such as a letter of interest, in annexing into the District. Despite the findings made by County staff in their analysis of the issues and the obvious interest in membership demonstrated by several cities, the Board of Supervisors had a motion before them to dissolve the District and bring it back under County department governance at the December 9, 1997 meeting. During discussion and prior to a vote being taken, it was decided to continue the item and refer the matter to the Local Task Force ('LTF') for that body's recommendation. The Board also asked staff to research and report back on four specific areas of concern. They were: 1. An exhaustive report on the cost impacts of dissolving the District. . Does the Board of Supervisors have the power to deny any attempt by a City or Cities to annex to the District? 1 How binding is the MOU with the COGs and Riverside Cities and could the Board of Supervisors opt out of the obligations contained therein? 4. A clarification of the LAFCO process to dissolve the District. The LTF reviewed the issue and staff's report at its December 18, 1997 meeting. They could find no rational reason to dissolve the District and their recommendation to the Board of Supervisors was to leave the District organization as it is. The item is calendared for the February 3, 1998 Board of Supervisors meeting at which time staff will present their report answering the Board's questions and concerns as stated above. We anticipate that at that time, the Board of Supervisors will again consider the dissolution of the District. Staff believes that the reasons the District was originally formed are still valid reasons to keep the District intact. The District is operating effectively and, up to this time, the Cities have r: ~ms~mdss\wm~lm~sb. ~ been able to exercise some degree of influence in the decisions made in the planning and operations of the District. It is important to note that County staff's report indicates that each City member that joins the District in some way accepts some of the County's liability. After careful examination, it is the opinion of Temecula's City Attorney that the City would incur no additional liability by virtue of District membership or our active participation on the District Board. The tenor of the December 9, 1997 Board of Supervisor's meeting was that the Board desires to dissolve the District and restrict City participation in the governance of the solid waste system. One Supervisor pointed out that flow control has virtually been accomplished through hauler agreements and the unfunded liabilities will be funded within about five and one half years, therefore the County no longer needs the same level of City participation as in the past. Another Supervisor pondered the possibility that if annexation actually took place, the Cities, who are the largest users of the landfills, might be able to outvote the County on certain issues. The Board questioned why Cities had waited so long to express interest in annexing to the District and feared that Cities would somehow prohibit the County from operating their facilities and setting the tipping fees as they chose. In general, the Board appeared to dismiss the County's staff analysis and findings. Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Resolution of Intention to join the District at this time. If enough Cities take such action prior to the February 3, 1998 Board of Supervisors meeting and present their requests in person to the Board, the Board may abandon the dissolution of the District. This will pave the way to begin an LAFCO action to annex the interested Cities into the District and provide for active participation in the governance of the Waste Resources Management District which serves all of the residents and businesses of the incorporated and unincorporated County of Riverside. FISCAL IMPACTS: According to the City Attorney, the City will be assuming no additional liability exposure by joining the District. Attachments: Resolution of Intention December 9, 1997 County Staff Report and Analysis August 16, 1994 Memorandum of Understanding September 3, 1997 City Attorney Analysis of District Membership January 6, 1998 Letter from Mayor Roberts to the Board of Supervisors, requesting a continuance of the item RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING APPLICATION TO JOIN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and a. A sanitation district called the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District ("WRMD") was formed to assume control and responsibility for operation landfills and disposal facilities serving residents and businesses of Riverside County. b. The WRMD was formed by Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO") action and is governed by Health and Safety Code regulations. Go of Riverside County. The initial goveming body of the WRMD is the Board of Supervisors d. On August 16, 1994, the Board of Supervisors entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (" MOU") with the Western Riverside Council of Governments and the Cochella Valley Association of Governments as a fundamental understanding of all agencies in establishing the WRMD. e. The MOU provides for the annexation of Riverside Cities into the WRMD upon the adoption of a resolution of application from a Riverside City to join the sanitation district. Section2. The City Council hereby applies for annexation and membership into the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District. Resolution. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this~ day of , 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1998, by the following vote: AYES: C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: C OUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk o o o o [] [] E EW E._~ · ~ x SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE SUBMITTAL DATE: December 9, 1997 SUBJECT: Waste Resources Management District: -An Analysis of Dissolution RECOMMENDED MOTION: Board of Supervisors Policy BACKGROUND: On October 28, 1997, [Agenda Item No. 10.1 Reorganization of the District Administrative Division] the Board of Supervisors (BOS) directed the County Executive Office to conduct an analysis of the Waste Resources Management District (WRMD) and submit a report to the BOS within 90 days. The analysis was to focus on the pros and cons of dissolving the WRMD and reforming it as a county department. Attached is a preliminary report analyzing the matter of retaining the WRMD or reforming it as a county department. (Continued on Page 2) Attachment CRAIG(~ANNING Deputy 'County Executive Officer FINANCIAL DATA: CURRENT YEAR COST $ NA NET COUNTY COST $ NA SOURCE OF FUNDS: NA ANNUAL COST $ 0 IN CURRENT YEAR BUDGET: YES/ NO/X BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES/ NO/X FOR FY: 1997-98 C.E.O. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE. Count7 Executive Officer Signature Prev. Agn. ref. Dist. ALL AGENDA NO. FORM 11 (Rev. 8/96) WRMD' An Analysis of Dissolution Form 11 Page The report concludes that the WRMD was formed originally to meet the obligation of providing Municipal Solid Waste service, to protect the County General Fund from known and b-nknown liability, and provide a bonding capacity other than the County General Fund for proposed transfer station's financing. It was established under State law and provides that as cities join the district [cities are currently the major users of landfills], they may participate in its governance. In fact, the cities could eventually hold the majority of seats on the governing board. The County's insulation from liability is greater with each city annexation into the District. The apparent advantage in reforming the WRMD into a county department is that the County would retain governing control of its department and be able to expand or limit its operation as it deems appropriate, so long as there was no conflict with State law. This benefit of management flexibility must be weighed against the perceived protection offered by the WRMD for current and future closure, postclosure, and remediation costs and liabilities. Shown in Attachment A are the steps to be taken for dissolving a special district. FORM 11 (Rev. 8/96) ~esources ~anagement. ~Districf: ~kn ~knalysis of Dissolution an~[ ][{eforrnation fo a Counfy ]Deparfmen~ Prepared by the County Executive Office for The County of Riverside ' Board of Supervisors December 1, 199 7 Waste Resources Management District Introduction · An Analysis of Dissolution The County of Riverside Board of Supervisors (BOS) on October 28, 1997, [Agenda Item No. 10.1 Reorganization of the District Administrative Division] directed the County Executive Office to conduct an analysis on the pros [advantages] and cons [disadvantages] of dissolving the Waste Resources Management District (WRMD) and returning it to County department status and submit a report of findings to the BOS within 90 days. The BOS requested that three specific issues be addressed: (1) Should the WRMD continue as a special district or be dissolved and reformed as a County department? (2) What are the pros, and cons of dissolving the WRMD? (3) As a department, may department revenues be used to "backfill" lost County General Fund revenue? This report deals with the three questions above by reviewing the formation of the WRMD, including the reasons for its formation and the issues that brought about the need to seek such an organization. The report also presents the pros and cons of the issues impacting dissolution and/or reformation to department status. The issue of revenue from WRMD being directed to General Fund use is only briefly touched in that funds are currently provided by WRMD to General Fund departments when a clear nexus appears. Other use would clearly be contrary to law, and County Counsel has so advised in the past. Formation Background The primary consideration for WRMD formation was whether a county had a statutory obligation to provide municipal solid waste (MSW) service and if so, was there a way to do it without opening the County to possible negative impacts on its bond ratings and liability for old, current, or future landfill remediation. Though not stated in an explicit manner or in a single statute, it appears that the County does have an obligation to provide MSW service within the unincorporated areas. There are a number of statues addressing the issue from various perspectives: Public Resources Codes §§40002, 40057-40058, 40059, Health and Safety Code ~450, State of California Constitution Article 11§7 [Police Powers], and court cases such as the City of Fresno v Pinedale Water District. It appears that a county does not have an obligation to provide MSW service to incorporated areas. Likewise, incorporated, areas are not obligated to dispose of their refuse at county-owned facilities. However, consideration was given to incorporated areas participating in WRMD when formed. This will be discussed in the following pages. Waste Resources Management District An Analysis of Dissolution On May 18,-'~993, the BOS approved in concept the formation of a county sanitation district, adopting Resolution of Application No. 93-173 requesting the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to start proceedings for the formation of the district. A legislative amendment to facilitate the formation of a sanitation district was also sought and obtained. A report prepared by the firm of O'Melveny & Myers, Public Financial Management, Inc., dated May 12, 1993, stated the following objectives to be met by forming a sanitation district: o Creating an institutional framework to encourage the participation of cities within the County in a Countywide solid waste management system... in order to achieve economies of scale and other benefits associated with other intergovernmental cooperation. o Insulating the County's General Fund from all future solid waste management costs, including debt repayment, closure costs and possible environmental liabilities, while at the same time providing guarantees to the cities within the County that solid waste revenues would be used only for solid waste programs. o Create a long-term financial structure for securing solid waste revenues to finance capital programs at the County landfills such as liners, leachate collection facilities, closure and postclosure care. . Financing the construction of planned materials recovery facilities, green waste cornposting programs, and household waste facilities within the County... in order to comply with Assembly Bill 939, which mandated significant reductions in the Countywide generation of solid waste. A key aspect of the formation of WRMD was to provide a vehicle to broaden governance authority for operations to include cities if they chose to annex in the future. The objective of offering to share governance was to improve trust, since a high percentage (approximately 75%) of revenue comes from city customers. This change of governance provision is in the State law for Sanitation Districts. However, to keep the governing Board of Directors at an optimum size, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was executed between the BOS and the two Councils of Governments (COG) as a fundamental understanding of all agencies in establishing the WRMD. Waste Resources Man.,agement District An Analysis of Dissolution The WRMD became functional on May 2, 1994, when a Certificate of Completion from LAFCO was recorded on that date. Formation Issues. The primary issues affecting the formation of the WRMD were the following: , How should the governance of a sanitation district within Riverside County be provided? The assumption was that cities should be given an opportunity to join and participate in the governance of a county sanitation district if they were major contributors of refuse. It should be noted that if cities annex into the District, they will eventually assume the majority of governing Board seats. . It was thought wise for the County to separate and transfer all assets and liabilities associated with operating waste facilities to the WRMD after formation. The objective was to provide the County with indemnification or a partial buffer from prior Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 42 USC [}9601 et seq. (CERCLA)liabilities associated with owning and operating landfills, to assist the County's General Fund financing ratings. , Future financing for disposal facilities would be kept off the County's General Fund books, and possibly improve the County's bond ratings for other County funding needs... . Privatizing field operations [to save money] is easier under the Sanitation District laws than under the laws governing the County. It appears that most of the issues surrounding the formation of the WRMD haCe basically been resolved. Two of the most important issues considered upon formation were: 1) continued participation of employees in the Federal Social Security System, and 2) whether cities could annex into the District. .~ With regard to the former, WRMD did not retain Social Security as a part of its retirement package and therefore there would be added cost to the district and its employers if the district were dissolved and reformed as a County department. With regard to annexations, within the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) area, ten (10) of the fourteen (14) member cities have taken an action expressing an interest in annexing into WRMD: Beaumont, Corona, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, and San Jacinto. Five of the ten Waste Resources Management District An Analysis of Dissolution cities have adopted a resolution with intent to apply for annexation (Corona, Lake Elsinore, Mumeta, Norco, and San Jacinto). T~__._e.q~_..~'t. ies~me~.t._t~_h_e__anne=~__xati____o_n criteria contained in the MOU o~in_9 a majority ?~he total County population. The city members of the Coachella Valley Association of (~overnment~'"~CVA'G)' Fiave not expressed any desire to annex into WRMD within the near future. Also, the City of Blythe has not expressed an interest in annexing into WRMD. Both COGs and their city members are currently reviewing the BOS directlye to consider the issue of the dissolution of the WRMD. The city members appear concerned with the County's apparent desire to revisit the issue. Analysis Central to the analysis of dissolution-or reformation of WRMD to a County department is the question of cost benefit. While the entire analysis and research process are not memorialized herein, the following summary presents sufficient information for making preliminary determinations. The District is funded primarily by Tipping Fees and it assumes liabilities as listed in Table 2 in addition to its operation costs and possibly future costs of expanding its landfills. Unfunded Liabilities and Tipping Fee Review. Presented in Table 1 is a delineation of how WRMD Tipping Fees are allocated to District programs. It was determined that all allocations were consistent with WRMD policies, contracts, and laws. These allocations shown in Table 1 under the category Pass Through, such as Household Hazardous Waste and Code Enforcement, are sometimes questioned as gifts to the County General Fund without having a nexus to the WRMD mission. The analysis revealed that these fees are expended appropriately, on mission-direct services, which benefits both city and county residents. Cities also receive a portion of-the Code Enforcement allocation to provide code enforcement service necessary to their refuse mission. Waste Resources Management District An Analysis of Dissolution Table 1 .,. Breakdown of Tipping Fee Elements .. Fiscal Year 96-97 97-98 Operations (Weighted Average) Landfill Ops (Incl. El Sobrante & Hauling Contracts) $9.18 $9.02 Litter Control .47 .45 Landfill Development 1.57 1.49 Engineering 1.54 1.46 Environmental Monitoring 1.30 1.23 Planning .29 .27 Recycling .82 .78 Administration 2.47 2.34 Debt Retirement 1.15 1.09 $18.79 $18.13 Pass-throughs Habitat & Environmental Mitigation $1.00 $1.00 State Required Fees 1.34 -~- 1.34 LEA .43 .43 Household Hazardous Waste .70 .70 Code Enforcement .35 .35 $3.82 $3.82 Current Closure $2.09 $2.81 Unfunded Liabilities 4.10 3.41 TOTAL TIP FEE $28~80 $28.17 Waste Resources Management District An Analysis of Dissolution Table 2 System Unfunded Liabilities [Based on Costs in the 1994 Hilton, Frankopf, & Hobson Study] ..... (Millions of Dollars) .,, ,, Total Unfunded Liability of Closure/Postclosure & Remediation on $44.0 7/1/95 Contributions: FY 1995-96 Tipping Fee Contribution plus $11.3 Reserves/Imports FY 1996-97 ,Tipping Fee Contribution plus $8.1 Reserves/Imports , Total Contributions for the 2 Year Period $19.4 ,, Unfunded Liability Balance on 7/1/97 $24.6 Projected Contributions for the 6 Year Period 7/1/97 through $24.6 6/30/03 Proj..ected Unfunded Liability Balance on 7/1/03 $0.0 As shown in Table 2, the total unfunded liability for closure, postclosure, and remediation as of July 1, 1995, was $44 million. Total contributions as of the end of Fiscal Year 1996- 97 were $19.4 million, leaving a projected unfunded liability of $24.6 million. Projections show the unfunded liability to be zero by the year 2003, given the continuance of current revenue collection rates and amounts. As shown in Table 1, the unfunded liabilJ. ty is being funded by allocations from the Tipping Fee. Issues Comparative Matrix. The Table 3 matrix below aligns the issues for comparison and quick referencing. Table 3 presents the issues surrounding the dissolution of the WRMD, the pros and cons of those issues, and comments for making determinations upon comparison of those issues. C c c' 0 ~ 0 E c · ~ Attachment A Procedural Steps for Dissolution of the Riverside County Waste Resources Management District Pursuant to State California Government Code §56800, "a proposal for a change of organization or reorganization may be made by the adoption of a Resolution of Application by the legislative body of an affected local agency." The BOS should take this action setting as the WRMD Board. Thereafter, the application [pursuant to §56828]4 would be submitted to LAFCO. After determination by the LAFCO Executive Officer that the required environmental analysis has been conducted, fees paid [$1,000 to LAFCO], and the information required under §56652 has been submitted, the LAFCO Executive Officer will issue a Certificate of Filing. Within 90 days of issuance of the Certificate of Filing, a hearing shall be conducted to consider the request. The LAFCO Staff Report shall include recommendations from the applicant, from interested parties/agencies as well as those from staff. As stated in {}56844, LAFCO has relatively broad power to impose terms and conditions on a change of organization or reorganization. Should LAFCO approve the proposed dissolution, the BOS [§56029] would become the conducting authority for completion of the dissolution proceedings. Thereafter, §57000 et seq, governs the hearings and activities to be undertaken by the BOS. Pursuant to §57083, the conducting authority may order the dissolution without election where it is shown that "the Board of Directors of the District has, by unanimous resolution, consented to the dissolution of the district." Otherwise, protest may be measured under §57077, and the conducting authority may take one of the following actions: -.~. . Terminate proceedings if a majority protest exists in accordance with §57078. , Order the change of organization subject to confirmation of the voters, or in the case of a landowner-voter district, subject to confirmation by the landowners, unless otherwise stated in the formation provisions of the enabling statute of the district. , Order the change of organization without election if it is a change of organization that meets the requirements of §§57081, 57083, or 57087; 'All code section references under the topic are to the California Government Code. _otherwise, the conducting authority shall take the action specified in 1Saragraph two. As recognized during the formation of the WRMD, the various relationships created, contracts executed and commitments made, would appropriately need to be factored into the subsequent dissolution. Completion of the dissolution process, assuming continuances do not occur, will require four to seven months to complete. G:\TRANSFER\WRMDRP~2.WPD ~'_~MORA_NrDUM OF UT',rDERSTANT)ING Whereas, the County of Riverside desires to establish a San/tat.ion District (Distr/ct) to assume control and responsibility for t.he operations of landfills and other disposal facil/tles which serve the Cities of Riverside Count; and Whereas, the Cities of Riverside County have a~m~eed to the formation of this d/str/ct with the understanding that the init/a/goverrdng body of the distr/ct will be the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County; and Whereas, the Board of Supervisors and the Cities of Riverside County seek to in. sure proper input into the policy decisions of the district from the Cities of Riverside County; and W'hereas, the Board of Supervisors and the Cities of Riverside County seek to establish an agreement which will guide the process of annexations into the Sanitation District should Cities seek to participate in the future; now, therefore It is agreed that the following procedures shall be incorporated into the record of the LAFCO action establishing the sanitation district, and shall be utilized to guide the actions of the Board of the San/at/on District: le The Board of the San/teflon District shall utilize the Executive Committees of the Western Riverside Council of Governments and the Coachella Association of governments (COgs) as policy advisory boards and shall submit all significant policy and major fiscal matters including the establishment of fees and charges for the landill/s, to the Executive Committee prior to telring action to allow the input of all Cities within Riverside County. It is agreed by all that tt-fis will take place in a 'timely manner. e The Board of Supervisors, acting ms the San/tation District Board, agrees to accept, and the COG Executive Committees agree to support, the annexation or reorganization of Cities into the San/tat/on District upon adoption of Resolutions of Application to Join the Distr/ct from a sufficient number of Cities representing a majority of the incorporated population within Riverside County. The Board of Directors of the District shall be reorganized to reflect Cities' participation consistent with existing State law. In the event an annexation containing a majority of the incorporated population occurs, the Board of Supervisors and the Executive Committees of the COgs agree to support the annexation of any other City which subsequently adopts and submits a Resolution of Application to Join the District. . The Board of Supervkors, acting as the Sanitation District Board ages to consider all requests for annexation or reorganization which do not meet this majority criteria identified in number 2 and to consul[ with all the Cities to determine if the annexation and/or reorganization which would result is appropriate. The Board of Supervisors agrees to support annexations or reorganizations which have the positive endorsement of the F_.xecutive Committees if the vote of all the Cities incllcate two-thirds of the Cities concur. The Board of Supervisors and the COGs agree that existing State law regarding governance issues of the Sanitation District~ may not best serve the Cities and the County of Riverside if annexation occurs. Accordingly, not later than a proposed annexation, the Board of Supervisors and the COG's will review ezkting legislation regarding the governance of the proposed new District boundary and w'G agree to support special legislation regarding the governance of the proposed new District boundary. e The Board of Supervisors and the COGs anticipate the Board of Directors of the District, when formed, will enter into a simii~ Memorandum of Understanding with the COGs. It is agreed by the Board of Supervisors and the Cities that they will work together to insure the successful operation of the landfill and disposal facilities to be placed under the jurisdiction of the Sanitation District and shall establish agreements which will define reasonable and appropriate methods to achieve that goal. l-h_is agreement Executed this ~ day of~, 1994 Ch :': ""o'ard of s{~pe~ors Riverside County Manigement Resources District ~ha/u/~ Executive Committee Western Pdverside Council of Governments ~TTEST: ~IJG I 6 1994 .GERALD A. MALIDNE¥~,~ Governments of OL~NN ~L WAllON I=1OBEI~tT (~. B~Y ~UREN~ ). N)~R ~ ~ ~HON ~N ~U~ W. A~UE MIC~L D~ O. PIEPER P~R M. ~O~N ~N E. ~NN~ ~ENDA L OlEDERIH ~EN ~ ~ JAME~ C ~M~ ~ L ~U~Z ~O~ B. OR~ RUBIN O. ~INER M~CHE~ E. ~ ~ T. ~MU~ ~MO~ ~ NEUFE~ ~R O. ~UME QREQ~ W, ~~H ~UL J~E MICHEL JEN~ QUINN M. ~R~ BENJ~IN ~MNO~ ~L W. L~H ~ ~. CU~ III JEFFR~ ~ ~IN D. ~ FOX ~RE~O~ M. ~NE~ ~ L HI~ ~O~ M. JIM~ ~RENCE MIOHE~ B~ ~NE~ DANIEL L ~N~ A~NDA F. IU~NO U~A ~NO ~BE~ C. CE~ DIANE ~K~ JOHN J. ~1~ ERI~ M. ~MI~ K~N Q. ENNI~ O~A WAI-~N ~U~ ~BIN O. ~RRI~ RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON A'I-rORNEY,~ AT LAW A ImFIOleE~IONAI- OORImOIm, A'rlON THIFITY-EIC3HTH FLOOR 333 SOUTH HOPE 0TREET lOO ANC~EELEE~, CALIFORNIA 00071-14B0 (~'13) ~l~8484 FACSIMILE (213) 1~6.-0078 la@rvvglaw.com September 3, 1997 CONFIDENTIAL THIS MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND/OR THE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES, DO NOT DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS HEREOF, DO NOT FILE WITH PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE RECORDS, RICHARD RICHARD~ ~ FI=IANCI,~--.~O TWO EMBARCADERO CENTER BUITE ~00 BAN FRANCI~..O, CALIFORNIA ~4111-3~01 (4lb') $3~1230 FACSIMILE (416) ~-1236 ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE BREA, CALIFORNIA ~'~.1 (714) FAC_~IMILE (714) O!= COUNSEL VVILUAM K. KRAMER 1480524 OUR FIII= NUMBER 11086-00001 ~R'B DIRECT DI~ NUMBER (213) 2s3~16 Ms. Phyllis Ruse City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Re: City Membership in Proposed Sanitation District of Riverside County Dear Phyllis: You have asked me to advise you regarding the liabilities the City may incur by annexing into the Waste Resources Management District ("District"), which is a county sanitation district formed by the County of Riverside pursuant to Health & Safety Code Sections 4730, et seq. Under the proposed arrangement for an expanded District, the landfills now owned by the County of Riverside would be owned and operated by the District. Specifically, you have asked whether the City may incur liability for personal injury or property damage caused the landfills which will be owned by the District. While we have found no case law or statutory law specifically addressing the liability issue, it is our opinion that it is likely a court considering the issue would rule that the District is a separate and distinct legal entity, independent from the City and, therefore, the City would not be liable for personal injuries or property damage caused by a landfill owned by the District, unless the City has some direct contractual relationship with the District for operation of the landfills or otherwise engages in specific actions contributing to the injuries or to the direct operation of the landfills. If the City does nothing more than support the annexation of land within the boundraries of the City to the District and the Mayor serves on the Board of Directors as provided by Health and Safety Code Section 4730, it would be highly unlikely that the City would bear any liability for personal injury or property damage from the operation of the landfills. The City could, however, bear some liability for personal injury or property damage arising from operation of the landfill if it undertakes to directly participate in the RICHARDS, WATSON & (3ERSHON Ms. Phyllis Ruse September 3, 1997 Page 2 CONFIDENTIAL TNIS MA'~R-~L ~ ~'~'B,~E~ ~ ~-~E '~'T'IJO~'~'~-CLIENT AND/OR THE A~ORN~ WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGEO. DO NOT DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS HEREOF. DO NOT FILE WITH PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE RECORBO. management or operation of the landfills by some type of contract or agreement. Additionally the City could bear liability for personal injuries or property damage caused by hazardous sutbstances in the landfill if the City were found to be an "arranger" of deposits of such substances into the landfill. These liabilities exist, however, regardless of whether the City is annexed to the District. DISCUSSION m. A SANTTATION DISTRICT IS A LEGAL ENTITY SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM THE CITY AND ITS POWERS AND AUTHORITY ARE DERIVED FROM THE STATE AND NOT ITS MEMBER CITIES. The District was organized as a county sanitation district pursuant to the terms of Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 el seq. and it appears that under the proposal the cities of Riverside County would be annexed into the existing district. While no case has specifically addressed the tort liability of a city for acts of a sanitation district operating within its boundaries, the case law and statutes under which the District operates establish it as an independent legal entity, separate and distinct from the cities and the county which form the District. In a number of cases the courts have held that sanitation districts are independent legal entities but have not addressed the question in the context of tort liabilities. Mitchell v. C01jnty Sanitation Dist,, 164 Cal. App.2d 133, 141 (1958) ("the district operates independent of other agencies"); Northeast Sacramento County Sanitation Dist. v. Northridge Park County Water Dist, of Sacramento County, 247 Cal. App.2d 317, 319 (1966) (even where the board of directors of a county sanitation district is the county board of supervisors acting ex officio, the sanitation district's board of directors "independent" of the county board of directors); County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v, LOS Angeles County Employees' Assn,, 38 Cal.3d 564 (1985) (footnote 1) (each sanitation district is a separate and autonomous political subdivision of the State of California). The power to establish a sanitation district is granted to the people through state law. Health and Safety Code Sections 4834 and the Municipal Reorganization Act, Government Code Section 57000 et seq., set forth the procedures for establishing a sanitation district and for annexing land to the district. The procedures require hearing and approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission and, possibly an election. Thus, sanitation district can be formed only through the procedures set forth by state law and cannot be established simply by the legislative actions of cities desiring to form one. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON Ms. Phyllis Ruse September 3, 1997 Page 3 ICONFIDENTIAL THIS MA~ER~L ~ s~aJE~T ~O T-~E ~3-r~NE~-CLIENT AND/OR THE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES. DO NOT DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS HEREOF. DO NOT FILE WITH PUBLICLY ACCES~IBLE RECORDS. Once. established it is state law which governs the operations of the district and the district's powers, therefore, originate from the state and not the cities and the county which desire to form the district. Health and Safety Code Section 4730 sets forth the composition of the governing body of the district; Section 4738 provides for the district to sue and be sued in its own name; and Sections 4738 to 4767 enumerate and limit the powers of the district. By contrast, a joint powers authority may be established by an agreement amongst the cities or county desiring to form it. The agreement defines its authority which is limited to and derived from the powers of one of its members. Government Code Section 6500 et seq. The structure of metropolitan water districts tbrmed under the Metropolitan Water District Act (Stats. 1969, c. 209) are similar in a number of ways to sanitation districts and provide some additional guidance in determining the status of sanitation districts. Metropolitan water districts are governed by a board of directors comprised of representatives from each city or water district within the boundaries of the metropolitan water district and are formed under the provisions of state law rather than through an agreement of its member entities. In Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. County of Riverside, 621 Cal. 2d. 641 (1943), the court analyzed the structure of the District and concluded that it was a "municipal corporation" and entitled to the benefits of certain tax laws applicable to municipal corporations. While not specifically stating the MWD was a separate legal entity from its member agencies and that the member agencies do not bear liability for the acts of the MWD, this case certainly provides strong support for such a conclusion. B. THE CITY MIGHT INCUR LIABILITY FOR ACTIONS IT UNDERTAKES JOINTLY WITH A SANITATION DISTRICT BY AGREEMENT. While we 'have concluded that a sanitation district is a separate legal entity from a city, deriving its powers directly from state law, the City can incur liability if it enters into some type of agreement with the sanitation district and either personal injury or property damage occurs as a result of the actions pursuant to such an agreement. If any such agreements or joint actions are contemplated, the agreements must include an indemnification clause apportioning liability. Government Code Section 895.2 addresses the liability of governmental entities acting joinfly and provides, in part: "Whenever any public entities enter into an agreement, they are joinfly and severally liable upon any liability which is imposed by any law other than this chapter upon any one of the entities or upon any entity created by the agreement for injury caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of such agreement." RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON Ms. Phyllis Ruse September 3, 1997 Page 4 CONFIDENTIAL THIS MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO THE ATtORNEY-CLIENT AND/OR THE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES, DO NOT DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS HEREOF, DO NOT FILE WITH PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE RECORDS, "Agreement" is broadly defined in Government Code Section 895 as follows: "As used in this chapter "agreement" means a joint powers agreement entered into pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, an agreement to transfer the functions of a public entity or an employee thereof to another public entity pursuant to Part 2 (commencing with Section 51300) of Division I of Title 5 of the Government Code, and any other agreement under which a public entity undertakes to perform any function, serviw or act with or for any other public entity or employee thereof with its consent, whether such agreement is expressed by resolution. contract, ordinance or in any other manner provided by law..." (Emphasis added.) However, this definition of agreement does not appear to extend to the proposed participation of the City in the District. The District is an independent and autonomous governmental entity as discussed above. The City will not have any "arrangement" with the District, either contractual or otherwise, but instead will be annexed into the District by action of the Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission, as specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 4834, et seq. In Zuniga v. Housing Authority, 41 Cal. App.4th 82 (1995) the court held the City of Los Angeles jointly liable with the Housing Authority for injuries resulting from a fire at one of the Housing Authority's units despite fact that the Housing Authority was a separate body politic. The court found that the City of Los Angeles had entered into cooperative agreements with the Housing Authority for the operation of a housing project. The court therefore held that Government Code Section 895.2 applied and City was liable for the injuries resulting from fire on the basis of the cooperative agreements. Government Code Section 6508.1 does provide that the governmental entities which are parties to some type of joint agreement can apportion their liabilities under the agreement. Thus, all joint agreements should include an indemnification clause apportioning the respective liabilities of the paxties to the agreement. Co CITY LIABILITIES UNDER FEDERAL LAW FOR ARRANGING DEPOSITS TO THE LANDFILLS As discussed above, if a sanitation district is formed for all of the cities in Riverside County for the ownership and operation of the landfills, the member cities are not likely to be held directly liable for damages arising from the operation of the landfill. However, it is important to recognize that certain federal laws do address potential city liabilities for "arranging" the deposit of municipal waste in landfills. This potential liability is unrelated to a city's participation in a sanitation district and will exist even if the sanitation district is not expanded to include all cities within Riverside County. RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON Ms. Phyllis Ruse September 3, 1997 Page 5 CONFIDENTIAL THIS MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO THE A'I-rORNEY-CLIENT AND/OR THE A'I-!'ORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES, DO NOT DISCLOSE THE CONTENTS HEREOF, DO NOT FILE WITH PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE RECORDS. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), the current owner of property from which there is a release, or a threatened release of a hazardous substance, is liable for all costs incurred in the cleanup. 42 IJ.S.C. Section 9607(a). When Congress passed the Superfund Amendments in 1986, it amended CERCLA to add a contribution provision. "Any person may seek contribution from any other person who is liable or potentially liable under section 9607(a) of this ritle, during or following any civil action under section 9606 of this title or under section 9607(a) of this rifle .... " 42 U.S.C. Section 9613(0. Section 9607 establishes four classes of persons liable under CERCLA for hazardous waste cleanup. Current owners, any person who owned the property at the rime of disposal, and transporters of hazardous waste are liable for cleanup costs under CERCLA. 42 U.S.C. Section 9607(a). In addition, "any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal, or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity ... shall be liable for ... all costs of removal or remedial actions incurred ...."42 U.S.C. Section 9607(a). Whether a city is liable as an "arranger" of disposal of hazardous substances is a complex factual and legal question which we do not address here. Moreover, the City's solid waste franchise contains an indemnification provision for such liabilities. These potential liabilities under federal law, if any, will exist whether or not the sanitation district is expanded and will not be affected by the expansion of the district, unless the City and the expanded district specifically address these issues by some type of agreement. me. PMT:mt 1480524 If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call Very truly yours, Peter M. Thorson lied orl Recycled Paper City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 · Temecuta, CA 92589-9033 January 6, 1997 Clerk of the Board Riverside County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 1147 Riverside, CA 92502-1147 Dear Clerk of the Board: I have become aware that the Board of Supervisors will be considering an item on January 13, 1998 to dissolve the Waste Resources Management District, bringing it back under governance as a County department. On behalf of the City of Temecula, I respectfully request that you continue this item for one month. Several Cities have akeady expressed interest in exercising their rights under the Memorandum of Understanding dated August 16, 1994 between the County and the Cities. I am sure you agree that this is a most complex issue with many points to be considered prior to any City reaching a decision to join or not join the. District. Temecula city staff has been reviewing and analyzing the issue for some time, but the item has not yet been considered by the City Council. The first possible Council meeting for this item to be discussed and considered is lanuary 27, 1998. Therefore, I am requesting a short delay in your decision on the dissolution of the District for another month to allow our City and other interested jurisdictions the oppommity to review any potential impacts such a decision might have on them. I am sure all interested jurisdictions will appreciate this good faith demonstration as the Cities and the County work together to determine the best orsanization for the waste management system that will serve all of the Riverside County jurisdictions not only today but for many years to come. Your continued efforts to address City concerns on regional issues is greatly appreciated. I plan on attending the January 13, 1998 Board of Supervisors meeting to personally address the Board on this matter. Thank you for consideration and assistance. Sincerely, CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts Mayor CO.' Temecula City Council City Manager ITEM 9 ORDINANCE NO. 98-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-01~ (ZONING AMENDMENT # 6 TO SPEC~C PLAN NO. 219),THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PROPERTY GI~IF_,RALLY LOCATEI) NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, FAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF B~ STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 9.q0-020-004, 9.qM}20.009 THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-0204r29, 9&q4B0-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ~ The City Council in approving Planning Application No. PA97- 0158 (Amendment # 6 to Specific Plan No. 219), makes the following findings, to wit: 1. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment [Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219]) is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of the modification to an existing Specific Plan, with no changes to the overall density or the number of units. Ultimate development of the site will be consistent and compatible with the existing land use in the area. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to The planned land use of The area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219. 5. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase The impacts aasociated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235. The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The City of Temeeula General plan EIR was certified on November 9, 1993. Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was prepared for Specific Ord8\98-01 1 Plan No. 219 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. In addition, an Addendum to that EIR was prepared in 1992 for Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Based upon this information, it is Sta~ s opinion that due to the scope (a decrease in the overall density of the projec0 of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, there will be no effect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. The City Council hereby determines that the project is consistent with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certif'led. Section 3. ~ That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219) on property generally located north of SR79 South, east of Meadows Parkway (north) and Margarita Road (south), south of Pauba Road and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 950- 020-001 through 950-020-004, 950-020-009 through 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020-029, 955-030-002 through 955-030-004 and 955-030-006 through 955-030-011, and conditioned in Exhibit uBn, attached hereto, and subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit uB~, in incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to The adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of The full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in The office of The City Clerk at least five days prior to The adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with The names of The Councilmembers voting for and against The Ordinance, and post The same in The office of The City Clerk. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVF~I), AND ADOPTI~D by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 13th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor Ords\98-01 2 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk of The City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that The foregoing Ordinance No. 98-01 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of The City Council on The 13th day of January, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of The City Council of The City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998, by The following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk Ords\98-01 3 ITEM 10 ORDINANCE NO. 98-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABL~ 17.06.030, TABLF~ 17.24.040 AND S~ON 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELO~ CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITI'F_~ USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINEI~ IN SECTION 17.24.050Co) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. F. iadiaga. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. follows: Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following uses to Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): Description of use HR VL L-I L.2 LM M H Granny Flat p p p p p p 3 p 3 Guest House P P P p p p s p 3 B. Add the following language to the end of Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): "3. Allowed only with a single-family residenee." Orda\98-0'2 I Section 2. follows: Table 17.24.040 of the Development Code is hereby mended to read as A. Revise the listing for multi-family residential from Table 17.24.040 - Parking Spaces Required to read as follows: Description of Use Required Number of Spaces Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Multiple family residential - 13 or more units) 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces 1 covered parking space plus 1/~ uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom (or less) units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and % uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units plus 1 guest space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces B. Add the following language to Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required): Second Unit 1 covered parking space for 2 bedroom units or less, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more Granny Flat 1 uncovered parking space Section 3. as follows: Section 17.24.050(B) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B.1 with the following: "When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14')." B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: "Residential Uses (two units or less)". C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050.B.3 to read as follows: "Residential Use (three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Onis\98-02 2 Otherwise the minimum width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20')." D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Section 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic." Section 4. follows: Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following Language to Section 17.34.010 (Definitions and Illustrations of Terms) of the Development Code: ""Guest House" means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-family residence, attached or detached, which may be u 'tllized by guests of the primary resi&mce for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not exceed eight hundred square feet in area." Section 5. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration for PA97-0348, therefore, is hereby approved. Section 6. ~ahil~. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, pamgt~h, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. 0rds\98-02 3 PASSe, APPROVED, AND ADO~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 13th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTF_ST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98-02 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of January, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temeeula on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, CMC Deputy City Clerk Ords\98-02 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JANUARY 13, 1998 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:50 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Robe~s, Stone. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. ' Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes = 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 9, 1997. 1.2 Approve the minutes of December 16, 1997. Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 2.1 Receive and file the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 1997. Release of Landscape Bond - Tract 23125-3 (DePortola Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road) 3.1 3.2 Authorize the release of Parkland\Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for Tract No. 23125-3 - Kaufman & Broad of San Diego, Inc. Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Minutes. CSD\11398 ] Temecula Community Services District 11398 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. Proposed Residential Street Lighting Fee - Tract No. 25892 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 1998, FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TRACT NO. 25892 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998.99 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 4.2 Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the completion, return, and tabulation of the ballots. 4.3 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the aforementioned process. Community Services Director Nelson reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). With regard to future ballots, Director Comerchero suggested that they be amended and clarified, giving the individual homeowner an alternate voting option, such as the following: NO - I do not want to pay this money. NO - I do not want to pay this money and I understand that it will then be paid through a Homeowners' Association. Director Comerchero noted that the ballot as presented only addresses the cost for street lighting and not whether the individual actually would want street lighting. Community Services Director Nelson noted that these recommendations would be addressed and included in future elections. At this time, the public hearing was opened but no public input was received. MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. M inutes. CSD\11398 2, Temecula Communib/Services District 11398 Park (approximately 15 acres) and one for Winchester Creek Park (approximately 4.5 acres), noting that both bid openings will be occurring within the next two weeks and construction should begin within the next 90 - 120 days. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. IBOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS A. Director Stone advised that he had met with Temecula Unified School Distdct Trustee Elder who had requested that the City and the Temecula Unified School Distdct review the possibility of joining forces in the construction of an Olympic-sized swimming pool. ADJOURNMENT At 7:57 P.M., President Stone formally adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, January 27, 1998, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary Minutes. CSD\11398 ~ TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPRO~Jr,, CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services January 27, 1998 Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary The Division of State Architects (DSA) has returned the plans for Margarita Community Park with comments. Bid opening for this project was held on January 15, 1998. A recommendation will go forward to the City Council on February 10, 1998 to award a contract for construction of Margarita Community Park. The Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and ballfield lighting. The City Council awarded a contract on October 7, 1997, to ModCraft for the ADA upgrades project. A pre-construction meeting was held on November 20, 1997 and the project is currently under construction. This project provides handicap accessibility to the following park sites: John McGee Park, Calle Aragon Park, Bahia Vista Park, Rancho California Sports Park and Veteran's Park. On October 7, 1997, the City Council approved an Easement Agreement to Allow Construction of Slopes and Drainage Facilities at Winchester Creek Park, with Pacific Century Homes ('Pacific'). Pacific began grading in December and the slope is partially constructed. Bid opening for Winchester Creek Park will be held on January 22, 1998. It is anticipated construction will begin in early April 1998. Winchester Creek Park is a 4.5 acre passive use park consisting of a tot lot, picnic facilities, an outdoor basketball court, a sand volleyball court and open turf areas. An RFQ was released in September, 1997 for the Cultural Arts Master Plan. Interviews were held on November 18, 1997, and staff has begun negotiations with the top rated firm. The Cultural Arts Committee will be bringing forward a recommendation to City Council in February 1998. The scope of work will be to prepare a ten (10) year Cultural Arts Master Plan for the City of Temecula. A Request For Qualifications was released for the design of a City library. RFQ's were received on November 25, 1997, and after review staff has selected 6 firms to participate in the interview process. Library architect interviews will be held on February 9, 1998. Staff anticipates bringing forth a recommendation to the City Council in March 1998. ~,~iGLEBG~Dl~FRi~9801 ~mmry 15, 1998 City Council awarded a contract to Dahl, Taylor & Associates for the design of a temperature control system at the Community Recreation Center gymnasium. This project is in first plan check. Staff anticipates this project will go out to bid in February 1998, and installation of the system will be completed by late Spring, 1998. P~L~IGLHRG~DHPTRPT~9801 Jm~utry 15, 1998 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 27, 1998 Generic Manufacturing Owner Participation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the Redevelopment Agency and City Councit conduct a joint public hearing and; 2) That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING., A CA CORPORATION 3) That the Agency adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA - 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING, A CA CORPORATION DISCUSSION: On December 16, 1997, the Agency considered a request for property tax reimbursement for Generic Manufacturing and directed staff to prepare an Owner Participation Agreement for property tax reimbursement in order to induce Generic Manufacturing to relocate to Temecula. R:~SYP. RSI~ST~OBNP. RIC.OPA 1116/98 I~s Generic Manufacturing manufactures labels, cappers and fillers for bottling. The Redevelopment Agency agrees to reimburse $10,000 of property tax to Generic Manufacturing for relocation expenses. In return, Generic Manufacturing agrees to operate an 11,118 square foot facility for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of the initiation of business activities at the Facility; and Generic Manufacturing shall employ thirty-one (31) employees within eighteen (18) months, sixteen (16) immediately and fifteen (15) within one and half (1 ½) years. They will spend t250-300,000 on equipment. FISCAL IMPACT: The reimbursement will be budgeted in the FY 1998-99 budget as a reimbursement of property taxes. No amounts will be paid until the building is completed and the proposed amount of employment has been met. R:~SYP. RS~STAFFREI~OENERIC.OPA 1116/98 Ir~s RESOLUTION NO. 98 - A RF.~OLUTION OF TIiF~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMF~NT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~ DOES HEREBY DETERMINE, RF~OLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. Generic Manufacturing (Participant) has proposed to relocate from Corona to Temecula and purchase an 11,118 sq. ft. building which is located within the Redevelopment Area to be used for manufacturing labels, cappers and fillers for bottling. B. The total cost of the building and equipment for the new facility should not be less than $810,000. C. Participant anticipates employing thirty-one (31) employees within eighteen (18) months, sixteen (16) immediately and fifteen (15) within one and half (1 ~,~) years. The average annual salary will be $25,000 - $28,000 per year. E. In order to induce Owner to relocate the Facility to Temecula and employ Thirty- one (31) employees, the following steps will be taken: 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula will reimburse the Participant a total of $10,000 relocation expenses incurred in connection with the move of the business from the City of Corona to the Facility in the City of Temecula, subject to the following conditions: a). Participant will agree not to relocate Facility from the City of Temecula for five (5) years from the date of the Agreement. b). Participant will agree to relocate business activities to the City of Temecula by employing thirty-one (31) employees with average salaries of $25,000 - $28,000 per year within one and half years (1~/~) years of the date of this Agreement. F. Pursuant to § 33444.6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Agency finds that the proposed financial assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the relocation of Amscan to the City of Temecula; and that the relocation assistance could not be obtained on economically feasible terms from the private market and will assist in R:~YER~K~H~O~\OI~I.CTY 1/22/9g k~s eliminating flight in the Project Area · G. This project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act on the grounds that the impacts of an Agency action such as this were part of the EIR for Plan approval pursuant to CEQA buildings § 15180. The Council finds that no facts exist to justify a subsequent or supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines § 15162 and 15163. Section 2. Based upon the above findings, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby consents to the approval of the Owner participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, the City of Temecula and Generic Manufacturing, a California Corporation in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1/22/98 PAssEr}, APPROVi~ AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the 27th day of January 1998. Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following vote: AGENCYMEJvtBERS' NOES: AGENCnb: ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: AGENCYMEMBERS: June S. Greek City Clerk r:~syersk~reso.ams R:XSY~I&KYR~8OS\OEN.CTY 1/22/98 k~s RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE R~I~EVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING A CA CORI~RATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. Generic Manufacturing (Participant) has proposed to relocate from Corona to Temecula and purchase an 11,118 sq. ft. building which is located within the Redevelopment Area to be used for manufacturing labels, cappers and fdlers for bottling. B. The total cost of the building and equipment for the new facility should not be less than $810,000. C. Participant anticipates employing thirty-one (31) employees within eighteen (18) months, sixteen (16) immediately and fifteen (15) within one and a half (I~A) years. The average annual salary will be $25,000 - $28,000 per year. E. In order to induce Owner to relocate the Facility to Temecula and employ thirty-one (31) employees, the following steps will be taken: 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula will reimburse the Participant a total of $10,000 relocation expenses incurred in connection with the move of the business from the City of Corona to the Facility in the City of Temecula, subject to the following conditions: a). Participant will agree not to relocate Facility from the City of Temecula for five (5) years from the date of the Agreement. b). Participant will agree to relocate business activities to the City of Temecula by employing thirty-one (31) employees with average salaries of $25,000 - $28,000 per year within one and half years (1~6) years of the date of this Agreement. F. Pursuant to § 33444.6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Agency finds that the proposed financial assistance is necessary for the economic feasibility of the reloeation of Amscan to the City of Temeeula; and that the R:~YER~k"~RE30.AGN 1/22/9g ~ relocafion assistance could not be obtained on economically feasible terms from the private market and will assist in removing blight in the Project Area. G. This project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act on the grounds that the impacts of an Agency action such as this were part of the EIR for Plan approval pursuant to CEQA buildings § 15180. The Council finds that no facts exist to justify a subsequent or supplemental EIR under CEQA Guidelines §15162 and 15163. Section 2. Based upon the above findings, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Owner participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, the City of Temecula and Generic Manufacturing, a California Corporation in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. R:~qYER~O. AGN 1/22/~g ~ PASSED, APPROV!~D AND ADOPTED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting on the 27th day of January 1998. liarel F. Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following vote: AGENCYMEMBERS: NOES: AGENCYMEkflS~S: ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: AGENCYMEMB~S: r:\syersk~reso.red June S. Greek City Clerk R:~YEI~O. AGN 1/22/~8 i~ OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMFX2ULA AND GENERIC MANUFACTURING THIS OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into and effective as of January 13, 1997, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a public body corporate and politic (the "Agency") and GENERIC MANUFACTURING, a California Corporation (the "Participant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the Agency and the Participant hereby agree as follows: Section 1. R~itals The parties enter into this Agreement on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions: a. The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan") for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area 1988-1 (the "Project Area") by pwviding for the elimination of blight in the Project Area and for economic revitalization within the Project Area through the stimulation of new and expanded business activity and the creation of employment opportunities. b. Participant is prepared to expand its business at the Site which will enhance the goals of the Agency in eliminating blight by creating additional employment opportunities in the Project Area, prevent the under utilization of industrial buildings in the Project Area by allowing for expansion of business operations, and contribute to the development of manufacturing and commercial businesses in the Project Area. The development of the Site is consistent with the Agency's Implementation Plan for the Project Area. c. Participant will construct a 11,118 square foot building at 27555 Commerce Center Drive (the "Facility"), to be used to manufacture labels, cappers and fillers for hotfling. Participant proposes to employ thirty- one (31) full-time employees within eighieen (18) months, sixteen (16) immediately and fifteen (15) from the date of the initiation of business activities at the new Facility. d. This Agreement is entered into for the purpose of inducing the Participant to relocate its business within the City of Temecula and to remain in business at the Site and not for speculation in land holding. LAX2:130070.2 September 5, 1995 e. This Agreement pertains to and affects the ability of the Agency to finance its statutory obligations and for all parties to finance and carry out the purposes of this Agreement and the goals of the Plan and is intended to be a contract within the meaning of Government Code § 53511. Section 2. The Redevelopment ~!an The Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. Purs~t to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over said Plan to the Agency, as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-03, Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at § 8.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The Plan was amended by Ordinance No. 94-33, adopted on December 20, 1994. Section 3. The Site The Site is located at 27555 Commerce Center Drive, City of Temecula which is within the Project Area. Section 4. Parties to the Agreement a. The Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, exercising governmental functions and powers and is organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment law of the State of California (§ 33000, el r81tl., Health and Safety Code; the "Act"). The principal office and mailing address of the Agency is P.O. Box 9033/43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589-9033. All references to approvals by the Agency shall mean the Agency Board, unless another Agency Officer is specifi~y designated in this Agreement. b. The Participant is a New York corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York. The principal office and mailing address of the Participant is: Generic Manufacturing, 1680 Commerce Street, Corona, CA 91720. Participant is the record owner of the Site and therefore qualifies as an "Owner Participant" within the meaning of the Redevelopment Plan and the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code § 33000, et LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -2- Section A_~eney nnd Participant Obli~_ations a. In order to induce Participant to relocate its business to the City of Tcmecula, to remain in business at the Facility and to expand business activities, the Agency agrees to reimburse the Participant a total of $10,000 relocation expenses incurred in connection with the move of the business from the City of Corona to the Facility in the City of Temecula, subject to the following conditions: O) Participant shall opem~ the Facility to manufacture labels, cappers and fillers for bottling for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of the initiation of business activities at the Facility; and (2) Participant shall continuously employ not less than thirty one (31) full-time employees within eighteen (18) months, sixteen (16) immediately and fffkxm (15) within one and half (1%) years. They will spend $250-300,000 on equipment. The parties hereto agree that the "date of initiation of business activities at the Facility" as used in this Agreement is February 1997. b. Participant warrants and represents that any information it has supplied to the Agency pertaining to the relocafion of Participant is true, correct and complete in all material respects. Participant represents that any projection, including but not limited to information concerning the projected job creation resulting from the Facility contained at Section 1, is true, correct and complete in all material respects according to the best available information. c. In the event the Participant fails to comply with the conditions set forth in this section, the Agency may demand that Participant repay the $10,000 reimbursement payment to the Agency within thirty (30) days of the Agency's demand for such payment, subject to the default provisions of this Agreement. d. With respect to the Agency's assistance for the Public Improvements as described in the Agreement, the Agency hereby finds determines and declares that: (1) Providing for such Public Improvements is necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Redevelopment ?1an for the reasons set forth in Section 1.b. and for the reasons set forth in the Plan and accompanying reports, which specifically contemplate the construction of such Public Improvements, as well as the findings made by the Board of Supervisors in adopting the Redevelopment Plan and subsequently validated in a court challenge. LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -3- (2) The Public Improvements are of direct benefit to the Project Area and the immediate area in which the Project is located for the reasons set forth in Section 1.b. and for the reasons set forth in the Plan and accompanying reports, which specifically contemplate the construction of such Public Improvements, as well as the findings made by the Board of Supervisors in adopting the Redevelopment Plan and subsequently validated in a court challenge. (3) No other reasonable means of financing the Public Improvements are available to the community to finance the Public Improvements based upon the reasons set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and accompanying reports, which specifically contemplate the construction of such Public Improvements, as well as the findings made by the Board of Supervisors in adopting the Redevelopment Plan and subsequently validated in a cou challenge. (4) The payment of funds for the Public Improvements will assist in the elimination of one or more of the blighting conditions inside the Project Area and is consistent with the Implementation Plan adopted for the Project Area for the reasons set forth in Section 1.b. and for the reasons set forth in the Plan and accompanying reports, which specifically contemplate the construction of such Public Improvements, as well as the findings made by the Board of Supervisors in adopting the Redevelopment Plan and subsequently validated in a court challenge. Section 6. Anti-Discrimination Obli~ntioo~ · The Participant agrees by and for itself and any successors in interest that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site, nor shall the Participant itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Site. Section 7. Notices. Demands. and Communicntion~ Amon~ the Partie~ Written notices, demands and communications between the Agency and the Participant, shall be sufficiently given by personal service or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the Agency or the Participant described in Section 4. Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -~- provided in this Section. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, notice personally served shall be deemed to have been received as of the date of such service. Section 8. Enforced Delay: Extenglon of Times of Performanc~ a. in addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by any tnu'ty hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where the party seeking the extension has acted diligently and delays or defaults are due to events beyond the reasonable control of the party such as but not limited to: war, insurrection, strikes, lockouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, intergalactic invasion, lack of transportation, litigation, unusually severe weather, or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform. b. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement o? the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause. c. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of the Executive Director of the Agency and the Participant. Section 9. Ingoeetion of Bookg and Reeord~ Foch party has the right to inspect, at reasonable times, the books and records of the other parties pertaining to the Site as pertinent to the purposes of the Agreement. Section 10. Indemnification The Participant shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for and hold the Agency, and its respective elected and appointed officers and employees, harmless from all costs (including attorney's fees and costs), claims, demands or liabilities judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death, which may be caused by any of the Participant's activities under this Agreement and on the Site, whether such activities or performance thereof be by the Participant or anyone direcfiy or indirectly employed or contracted with by the Participant and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement. This indemnity includes, but is not limited to, any repair, cleanup, remediafion, detoxificafion, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action) concerning any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in the LAX2:130078.2 September 5, 1995 -5- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ["CERCLA"; 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et rulq.], the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [#RCRA*; 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et ,~:1.] and California Health and Safety Code Section Code Section 25280 et ~w,11. at any place where Participant owns or has control of real property pursuant to any of Participant's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107 (e) of CERCLA and California Health and Safety Code Section 25364 to assure, protect, hold harmless and indemnify Agency from liability. Section 11. Defaults - General a. The failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. A party claiming a default (claimant) shall give written notice of default to the other party, specifying the default complained of. The defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days within which to cure the default. b. In the event the Participant fails to cure the default, the Agency may terminate this Agreement upon two (2) business days notice to Participant. In the event the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Participant shall repay to the Agency all funds paid by the Agency to Participant pursuant to this Agreement within thirty (30) days of the demand for such funds. Section 12. Legal Actions a. In the event a default is not cured as provided in this Agreement, the non- defaulting party may exercise all rights and remedies available to it by law. b. In the event such litgafion is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. c. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. d. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by any party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. e. Any failures or delays by any party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not ~ as a waiver of any default or of any such rights LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -6- or remedies, or deprive any such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or rcmcdics. Section 13. Compliance With All Laws and Regulations The Participant shall carry out the provisions of this Agreement in conformity with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including, without limitation, such laws and regulations pertaining to the payment of prevailing wages which might be applicable to its obligations. Section 14. Entire A_~,reement, Waivers & General a. This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement includes pages 1 through 7, which constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. b. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. c. All amendments hereto must be in writing executed by the appropriate authorities of the Agency and the Participant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Karel Lindemans Chairperson LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -7- ATI'F. ST: JUNES. GREEK Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: PETER M. THORSON General Counsel GENERIC MANUFACTURING a California Corporation By President Lonnie Belts LAX2:130878.2 September 5, 1995 -8- ITEM 2 APPRO~, ~- C~TY ATTOENEY F~NANCE OFFICER C~TY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 27, 1998 Acquisition of Property for Affordable Housing Prepared By: John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution Entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES BACKGROUND: We have received notice from the County of Riverside Office of the Treasurer-Tax Collector that APN 922-022-013 (41818 6th Street) is in tax default. The attached resolution objects to the sale of the property at public auction. This action does not interfere in any way with the property owner's ability to cure the tax default. Rather, this action places the Agency in first position should the property owner not redeem the property. The Agency would use this property to develop affordable housing. FISCAL IMPACTS: The County has set the purchase price at $3,370.00. Additional costs to process this request are $447.50 to pay for a legal notice and lot book report required by the County. Currently there is $1,129,938 in the Affordable Housing line item for FY 1997-98 (Account 165-199- 812-5804). Exhibit A: Resolution P.:~HOUS]NCAPID'OLACQ~I'E'FTCO.~.~, 1/20/98 jrm I Exhibit A Resolution R:\HOUSING\PUJOLACQ\JETTCO.RES 1/12/98 jrm 2 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY TEMECULA, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has determined that certain tax-defaulted parcel of property is within the City of Temecula and the City desires to purchase said parcel for public purposes; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector has determined the purchase price for which such parcels may be acquired by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City does hereby object to the sale of the .16 acre parcel of land, located in the City of Temecula and described below: Assessor's Parcel Number: 922-022-013 Also known as 41818 6th Street. Legal Description: Lot 18 BK 15/726 SD Town of Temecula The purchase price established by the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector, pursuant to the Tax Collector's Power of Sale, is $3,370. Section 2. The City of Temecula does hereby offer to purchase this parcel of land identified in Section 1 above, from the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector pursuant to the provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, Chapter 8, Section 3371, et al. in such forms as the Riverside County and Tax Collector shall specify. Section 3. The City hereby certifies to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector that the public purpose for which the parcel of land will be devoted is a follows: Affordable Housing Section 4. The City Manger of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized to execute any and all such Chapter 8 Agreements of Sale to carry out the purposes of this Resolution, and to forthwith pay to the Riverside County Treasurer and Tax Collector, the full purchase price therefore, as specified in Section 1, together with all costs of giving notice pursuant to statute, in full recognition that such costs are in addition to, and not included within, the purchase price. In addition, the City agrees to pay publication costs incurred event if the property is redeemed, and therefore not conveyed to the City, and to pay the full costs of Lot Book Reports, which City further recognizes to be non-refundable fees. Section 5. The City Manager is further authorized to execute any and all other documents, agreements and certifications required or desirable to consummate the purchase contemplated hereunder. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27 day of January, 1998. Karel Lindemans, Chair ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27 day of January, 1998 by the following vote, to wit: AYES' AGENCYMEMBERS: NOES' AGENCYMEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Location Map -- m ~-".~~ Subject Property ITEM 3 APPRO¥I~,L. CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAlICE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director and Agency Members , Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director "~~ January 27, 1998 Consideration of Funding for a Mural at Sixth Street Parking Lot. Prepared By: John R. Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency members consider granting 85,000 to fund a mural at the Sixth Street Parking Lot. , BACKGROUND At the request of Chairperson Linderoans, the Agency Board is requested to consider funding for a second half of the mural located at the Sixth Street Parking Lot. The first half of the mural was completed for Ed Dool. The mural is located on the rear wall of the Circle K Center. As the applicant, Mr. Dool applied and received a $5,000 grant through the Facade Improvement Program. Mr. Dool was required to and received the property owner's approval. ANALYSIS Per the Facade Improvement Program, an applicant is eligible for a ~5,000 grant and a $5,000 loan for facade improvements. The ~5,000 loan requires no payments and is forgiven after five years. Principal and interest is due if the property is sold within the five year period. A lien is recorded on the property, so the Agency is notified if the property is sold. Mr. Dool originally applied for the entire mural through the Facade Improvement Program. He represented that the property owners were unwilling to attach a lien on their property and therefore would not participate any further. Staff spoke with Steve Snow who represents the owner. He indicated that because the property will be on the market in the near future, the owners would not want to lien the property, which would require them to pay back the $5,000 plus interest when the property sells. They would, however, give the Agency permission to paint the mural on the building. R:\OLDTOWN\FACADE\MURAL.CC 1/9/98 jrm 1 FISCAL IMPACT The $5,000 grant would be funded through the Facade Improvement Program (Acct. No. 280- 199-813-5804), which currently has a balance of ¢145,444. Contracts are pending with four applicants for improvements of approximately ¢50,000. In addition, two additional applications have been taken out for another ¢25,000 worth of improvements. R:\OLDTOWN\FACADE\MURAL.CC 1/9/98 jrm 2 ITEM 4 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~j~~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 27, 1998 Consideration of Sponsorships Requests Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members consider the sponsorship requests for: 1) 2) 3) 4) Temecula Rod Run - $10,000 Great Temecula Tractor Race - $10,000 Frontier Days Rodeo - $10,000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival - $25,000 DISCUSSION: Staff has received the annual sponsorship requests for the Temecula Rod Run, the Great Temecula Tractor Race, the Frontier Days Rodeo and the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. The City of Temecula hosts a wide array of exciting special events year-round all adding to its rich quality of life. Residents and visitors look forward to attending these popular events each year and helps to make Temecula the unique community that it is. All of these popular events have proven to be very effective in getting great exposure both on a local and national level. The events increase tourism revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, shopping centers, and wineries. The events also bring into the community additional dollars to local merchants for goods and services generated by each event. Due to the fact that the events promote tourism in Temecula, funding would come from the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development budget. There will be no commissions paid to any party for the City of Temecula's sponsorships. R:\SYERSK\STAFFREP~SPONSOR.JAN 1121/98 kge Temeeula Rod Run Staff has received the annual sponsorship request in the amount of ~ 10,000 for the Temecula Rod Run, which is attached for your review. The Rod Run event is the largest event held within the City of Temecula. This regional event has become a favorite for Southern Californian's, as displayed by the 40,000 plus spectators that fill the streets of Old Town each year. The 12th Annual Temecula Rod Run will be held February 13 - 15, 1998, in Old Town Temecula. This family event will feature a Valentine's Hearts & Rods Dance, Barbecue and Sock Hop, Carnival all weekend, and the popular street rods. The Temecula Rod Run has experienced major growth in recent years, both in spectators and show cars. This event is sponsored this year by the Temecula Town Association, a nonprofit organization. With the dissolution of the Old Town Mainstreet Association and as the event is under new management, the previous detailed publicity recap of the 1997 event is not available to report. The '97 event did appear on television stations KABC-Los Angeles, KNBC and KTLA. The Rod Run also had billboard and radio advertising in the Inland Empire. Marketing for the '98 event has begun with distribution of 5,000 Rod Run flyers and applications to Classic Car Clubs and organizations throughout Southern California. Publicity and marketing will continue with print advertising and radio partnerships, publicity via major television networks, car magazines and general interest/entertainment magazines. Great Temecula Tractor Race Staff has received the annual sponsorship request in the amount of $10,000 for the Great Temecula Tractor Race, which is attached for your review. The 22nd Annual Great Temecula Tractor Race, sponsored by the Temecula Town Association, which will be held at the Temecula Showgrounds on October 2 - 4, 1998. The Tractor Race will increase its family appeal this year through enhanced entertainment and children's programs, advertising, and incorporating the carnival inside the Tractor Race grounds. By expanding the children's activities and altering the entertainment to a contemporary audience, increased media exposure and interest over previous years will be generated. The event had approximately 15,000 in attendance in 1997 with the attendance expected to increase to 20,000 this year. Last year the City of Temecula received wide spread media exposure from the Tractor Race event through newspaper, magazine, radio and television coverage on local and national levels. Total print impressions equaled over 3.3 million with press releases appearing in major papers as the Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union-Tribune, North County Times, Orange County Register and The Press-Enterprise. The 1997 Tractor Race was featured on more broadcast media than ever before. Radio support included radio stations in the Inland Empire and San Diego areas. R:~SYERSK~STAFFREP~SPONSOR.JAN 1121/98 kg~ Uve television coverage included KTLA, the number one morning news in the Los Angeles area and KTTV-Fox News. Additional television coverage consisted of KABC and KNBC in Los Angeles, OCN Cable News in Orange County and KFMB in San Diego. This year the publicity and marketing will be increased to include race enthusiasts and possible cross promotions with Perris Race Track. Frol~tier Days Rodeo Staff has received the sponsorship request in the amount of $10,000 for the Frontier Days Rodeo, which is attached for your review. The Frontier Days Rodeo, a PRCA-Sanctioned Rodeo, is produced by the Temecula Town Association. The rodeo will be held Memorial Day weekend (May 23 & 24, 1998) at the Temecula Showgrounds at Diaz and Winchester Roads. In 1997, the Temecula Town Association resurrected The Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo, one of the longest standing rodeos in Southwest Riverside County. Last year the rodeo hosted hundreds of cowboys and drew between 7,500 - 10,000 spectators over the weekend. Media coverage for the '97 event consisted of radio, print and website coverage which reached nearly 2 million readers and listeners. Print impressions totaled 627,789 and consisted of the Pro Rodeo News, San Diego Union Tribune, The Press-Enterprise, and other local newspapers. The event appeared on the PRCA Website which averages 700,000 hits per year. KFROG held a remote broadcast and there were three weeks of radio promotions on KATY. Publicity for the '98 rodeo will begin in Pro Rodeo News, the official PRCA newspaper, in February. Additional press releases of the Rodeo will be sent to regional equestrian/horsemanship publications, as well as sports writers and entertainment writers. Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Staff has received the sponsorship request in the amount of $25,000 for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, which is attached for your review. The Festival is requesting an additional $14,500 in sponsorship over last year as the Festival indicates that its targeted public relations campaign coincides with the City's marketing program for the continued economic development of the City of Temecula, thus this increase can be justified. The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival has a balance due the City for $5,000 from the loan made in 1992 which will be paid in full at the conclusion of the 1998 Festival. The Festival continues to maintain its high level of attendance which ranges from 40,000 - 50,000 guests. The '98 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival will be celebrating its 15-year anniversary, April 24- 26, 1998 at Lake Skinner. Publicity for the 1997 Festival received more coverage compared to prior years. Festival articles appeared in national, international and regional publications with a total number of impressions of 15,486,328 and 6,907,449 total circulation of periodicals. A sampling of the magazines include Balloon Life Magazine, Orange Coast Magazine, Westways and Where R:\SYERSK\STAFFREi~SPONSOR.JAN 1121/98 k~ Magazine. Live television coverage from the Festival came from KABC-Los Angeles, FOX - KTTV & Sports Network, and KFMB/CBS-San Diego. Various radio stations in the Bakersfield, Los Angeles, Inland Empire, San Diego, Orange County and Palm Springs areas aired promotional spots. The Festival has budgeted to buy $40,000 worth of media in the form of print, radio and possibly television. Media buys will include San Diego, Riverside, Los Angeles, and Orange counties. In addition, the Festival is seeking bartered advertising with the media, Vons Markets, Ontario Mills, Coco's Restaurant and other sponsors. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient monies are budgeted in the RDA to fund the Temecula Rod Run and the Frontier Days Rodeo requests. An additional appropriation to account #280-199-999-5264 will be necessary if the Council desires to increase the sponsorship for the Temecula Balloon and Wine Festival to $25,000. If the Council desires to sponsor The Great Tractor Race event, funding for this event will be included in the FY 1998-99 budget as the event takes place in October. ATTACHMENTS: Temecula Rod Run Attachment A - Sponsorship Package Attachment B- Budget and Media Plan Great Temecula Tractor Race Attachment A - Sponsorship Package Attachment B- Budget and Media Plan Frontier Days Rodeo Attachment A - Sponsorship Package Attachment B- Budget and Media Plan Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Attachment A - Sponsorship Package Attachment B- Budget and Media Plan R:\SYERSK\STAFFREP~SPONSOR.JAN 1121/98 k~ TEMECULA ROD RUN ATTACNMENT A TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, t998 1998 Temecula I~od I~un $ o,ooo frontier Days Pi~CA I~odeo $ o,ooo anti ! 998 (ireat Temecula Tractor Itace Promotional 8ponsorship $1 o,ooo As the Promotional Sponsor of the Temecula Rod Run, Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo and the 22st Great Temecula Tractor Race, the City of Temecula will assist the Temecula Town Association in preserving the rich heritage of Temecula. From the beginning Temecula has been known for it's pioneer spirit, farms and cattle ranches. A significant part of Temecula's Old Town district, the walking tour, and buildings are tied directly to old west charm. The Temecula Rod Run brings over 40,000 spectators each year to witness Old Town's charm while discovering the many recreational amenities that make Temecula a great weekend desitnation. The Froniter Days PRCA Rodeo exemplifies the Great American Spirit which helped build and preserve Old Town Temecula. The Great Temecula Tractor Race remains to this day the world's most unique event and television broadcasters' favorite Temecula-based event for live news coverage. The Temecula Town Association, dedicated to preserving and promoting Old Town Temecula, is proposing a sponsorship which ties the marketing benefits of the three events into one powerful marketing and publicity tool for the City of Temecula. This proposal includes marketing plans for all three events for the City's consideration. TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, t998 As the "Premier Sponsor" the City of Temecula will receive: · Print exposure for City name on all advertisements for all events. · City name in all press releases for all events. · Prominent exposure to all broadcast media covering the events. · Invitations to media days and television news broadcasts. · City Flag carried in during the Grand Entry Rodeo Parade · City name and recognition as a sponsor in sponsor-related press releases. · City banner displayed at all events recognizing the City. · Full page, color ad in Great Temecula Tractor Race official program. (40,000 distributed) · City name on Great Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · Full page, color ad in Rod Run official program. (Printed and inserted in the Press-Enterprise) · City name on Rod Run t-shirts · Advertisement in the Frontier Days Rodeo official program. · Name re-inforcement and recognition development through radio promotions for all three events. · Licensing rights to use the event logos of all events, for City marketing program. · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the Great Temecula Tractor Race · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the PRCA Rodeo · 15 Great Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · 15 Rodeo t-Shirts · 15 Rod Run t-shirts · The rights & ability to insert information, brochures and visitor information into the welcome packets of 1,000 classic car owners, 100s of cowboys, and over 100 tractor drivers at the races. · 12 Admission Passes to Tractor Race Casino Night (Chips not included) · 12 Admission Passes to Friday Night Hearts & Rod Dance · 12 Tickets to Saturday Barbecue ATTACHMENT B TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION PROPOSED 1998 BUDGET DEPT 5 (ROD RUN) INCOME: Beer/Bar Dance Entries Parking Souvemrs Sponsors Vendors TOTAL INCOME 11,500.00 5,000.00 32,000.00 5,000.00 12,000.00 50,000.00 8,000.00 123,500.00 EXPENSES: Advertising & PR Awards & Trophies Beer/Bar Car Club Contingency-Includes potential bonus Dance Donations-Service Eqmpmcm Rental Girls & Souvenirs Golf Carts/Radios Hospitality Insurance Motor Home Office Expense Parking Permits/Licenses Sanitation Security Signage Site Prep Sound/DJ Trash-Clean Up TOTAL EXPENSES i0,000.00 2,400.00 4,000.00 5,500.00 6,300.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 12,000.00 500.00 300.00 2,500.00 400.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 500.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 500.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 89,900.00 NET INCOME-PROFIT/(LOSS) 33,600.00 larketing & PubliCity Campaign 1998 Temecula I od I un Now in its 12th year, the Temecula Rod Run draws the largest crowd to the city streets of Temecula of all events. Hotels are sold out and restaurants packed full with spectators and hot rod owners and over 40,000 people visit Old Town Temecula to view the classic vehicles. After the dissolution of the Old Town Mainstreet Program, the Temecula Rod Run was in pedl. No other event held in the city of Temecula has the potential or appeal of the Temecula Rod Run. A kick off to the spdng toudst season for Temecula, 1,000 hot rod owners cruise city and country streets, tour wine country providing both sales and entertainment value to the vintners, provide both transitory and sales tax dollars and attract crowds of classic/vintage auto enthusiasts. Now under the management and leadership of the Temecula Town Association, this event which blends up-scaled classic car owners, with the ambiance of Old Town, this valuable city event continues. Marketing for the event has already begun with distribution of thousands of Rod Run '98 flyers and applications to car clubs throughout Southern California. Publicity and marketing will continue through the Rod Run in February and will include pdnt advertising partnerships, radio partnerships and publicity via major television networks, car magazines and general interest/entertainment magazines. Advertising: Through advertising sponsors advertising will begin January 16, 1998. Promotional Partners include: The Californian The Bargain Bulletin The Press Enterprise KATY FM Radio KRTM 88.9 FM KOLA Radio KFROG - Sun City Advertising: Flyers/applications: A 4 week campaign will begin January 16th with KATY, KRTM radio stations, local newspapers and the Bargain Bulletin. The official Rod Run program will be inserted into the Southwest and Temecula Press Enterprise zones on Thursday, February 12. 5,000 Flyer Distribution began in November to Classic Car Clubs and organizations Posters: The Press-Enterprise will produce the four-color poster which will be distributed throughout Southern California through car clubs and the Over The Hill Gang. Program: Admission: Radio Promotions: 36,000 will be inserted into the Press-Enterprise Admission to the Rod Run is free for spectators. Admission to the Hearts and Rod Dance on Friday, February 13 is $5 per person. Admission to the Saturday Barbecue and Sock Hop is to be determined. KOLA Radio will assist with promotions and will culminate their "Romantic Getaway" contest at the Saturday Night event. Promotions for the Rod Run on KOLA will begin January 26. Promotional partnerships are also being pursued with KFROG 92.9 FM, KOLA, and KLOS. Due to time restrictions the KLOS tie-in will probably need to be developed for 1999. PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES: Guest/Star Vehicles Media Day: Letters have been sent requesting exhibits from: Mark & Bdan - Mobile Bat Mobile Tim Allan More Power Chevy Petersen Automotive Museum These vehicles are being pursued for additional exposure and publicity and if available will be on display at various venues throughout the city of Temecula. Is scheduled for Friday, January 30, 1998 at the Stampede. Activities will include entertainment, a preview of the cars coming to the Rod Run, food and refreshments. A broadcast media event is planned for Friday morning, February 13th. Invitations will be sent to all television anchors/contacts to preview the Rod Run, ride in a hot. rod, etc. Los Angeles stations KTLA and KTTV FOX have already expressed an interest in the event. Publicity: Marketing and public relations is being conducted by Melody's Ad Works. Publicity for the Rod Run began in November. Calendar notices have been sent to over 60 publications including: CHEVY HIGH PERFORMANCE NASCAR SUPERTRUCK RACING ROAD AND TRACK GOODTIMES GAZETTE HOT ROD KEEPIN' TRACK OF VETTES CAR CRAFT AUTOMOBILE QUARTERLY MUSTANGS AND FAST FORDS MUSTANG ILLUSTRATED SUPER CHEVY STREET RODDER PETERSEN PUBLICATIONS STOCK CAR SPECTACULAR STREET MACHINE HOT STREET CARS RODS AND CUSTOMS WESTWAYS INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE ORANGE COAST MAGAZINE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MAGAZINE SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE SAN DIEGO HOME AND GARDEN BUZZ MAGAZINE SAN DIEGO READER LOS ANGELES READER SUNSET MAGAZINE WHERE MAGAZINE VITTLES, VINES & VOYAGES BILL TOMICKI'S ENTRE TRAVEL SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE WHEELS CAR CALENDAR DESCRIPTION DATE/MONTH PRESS RELEASES/LETTERS Calendar Sponsorship releases Rod Run Update PSAs/Rod Run Invitations to TV Press release on event Casino Night press Saturday Night event Rod Run Changes Event extras/calendar Media Day Invitations Tickets Available To all magazines local publications local publications have available at Christmas Dinner local KRTM KATY news anchors/celebs regional newspaper/calendars local publications local publications local publications regional pubs (Jan. 15th/pubs, tv, sponsors) (for events)local publications # Cars pre-registered/specials local press Event Feature Articles all publications November 7 December 8 December 15 January 9 December 28 January 9 January 16 January 23 January 23 January 23 Mail December 26 January 30 February 6 February 12 COMMUNICATIONS: Phone follow up Television invitations Television Calendars Radio Station PSAS Media day Invitations Event coverage January 9 January 9 January 16 January 7 February 10 MARKETINGIADVERTISING DESCRIPTION DEADLINE/DATE Sponsorship packages Sponsorship solicitation begin complete Flyer Distribution Poster Printing Distribute Media Day Radio Advertising to begin Newspaper/local advertising Radio Interviews Billboard All Advertising Increase Program Insert Remote Broadcasts November 13 October 31 December 28 November January 2 January 9-16 January 15 January 16 January 16 February 2-7 February 1 Feb 2-16 February 12 Throughout event GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE ATTACHMENT A TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, t998 1998 Temecula I~od I~un $ o,ooo Erontier Days PI~CA I~odeo $ o,ooo and 1998 Oreat Temecula Tractor I~ace Promotional &ponsorship $ I 0,000 As the Promotional Sponsor of the Temecula Rod Run, Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo and the 22st Great Temecula Tractor Race, the City of Temecula will assist the Temecula Town Association in preserving the rich heritage of Temecula. From the beginning Temecula has been known for it's pioneer spirit, farms and cattle ranches. A significant part of Temecula's Old Town district, the walking tour, and buildings are tied directly to old west charm. The Temecula Rod Run brings over 40,000 spectators each year to witness Old Town's charm while discovering the many recreational amenities that make Temecula a great weekend desitnation. The Froniter Days PRCA Rodeo exemplifies the Great American Spirit which helped build and preserve Old Town Temecula. The Great Temecula Tractor Race remains to this day the world's most unique event and television broadcasters' favorite Temecula-based event for live news coverage. The Temecula Town Association, dedicated to preserving and promoting Old Town Temecula, is proposing a sponsorship which ties the marketing benefits of the three events into one powerful marketing and publicity tool for the City of Temecula. This proposal includes marketing plans for all three events for the City's consideration. TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, 1998 As the "Premier Sponsor" the City of Temecula will receive: · Print exposure for City name on all advertisements for all events. · City name in all press releases for all events. · Prominent exposure to all broadcast media covering the events. · Invitations to media days and television news broadcasts. · City Flag carried in during the Grand Entry Rodeo Parade · City name and recognition as a sponsor in sponsor-related press releases. · City banner displayed at all events recognizing the City. · Full page, color ad in Great Temecula Tractor Race official program. (40,000 distributed) · City name on Great Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · Full page, color ad in Rod Run official program. (Printed and inserted in the Press-Enterprise) · City name on Rod Run t-shirts · Advertisement in the Frontier Days Rodeo official program. · Name re-inforcement and recognition development through radio promotions for all three events. · Licensing rights to use the event logos of all events, for City marketing program. · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the Great Temecula Tractor Race · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the PRCA Rodeo · 15 Gmat Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · 15 Rodeo t-Shirts · 15 Rod Run t-shirts · The rights & ability to insert information, brochures and visitor information into the welcome packets of 1,000 classic car owners, 100s of cowboys, and over 100 tractor drivers at the races. · 12 Admission Passes to Tractor Race Casino Night (Chips not included) · 12 Admission Passes to Friday Night Hearts & Rod Dance · 12 Tickets to Saturday Barbecue ATTACHMENT B TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION PROPOSED 1998 BUDGET DEPT. 3 (TRACTOR RACE) INCOME: Acln~ssions Beer/Bar Casino Night Entries Event Parking Kids Faire/Carnival Miscellaneous RV Parking Sponsors Vendors TOTAL INCOME 50,000.00 30,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 35,000.00 20.000.00 154,500.00 EXPENSES: Advertising & PR Awards Beer/Bar Casino Night Contingencies Donations-Service Electric Power Entertainmere Equipment Rental Insurance-General Licenses & Permits Media Day Sanitation Security Signs Site Prep Supplies Trash/Clean Up Utilities VIP Tern Work Parties TOTAL EXPENSES 10,000.00 2,000.00 9,000.00 2,500.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 19,000.00 40,000.00 10,000.00 2,400.00 500.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 500.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 1.500.00 131.4.0" ~.o NET INCOME-PROF1T/(LOSS) 23,100.00 The 22nd Annual Great Temecula Tractor i ace The 22nd Annual Great Temecula Tractor Race will increase its family appeal this year through enhanced children's programs, enhanced advertising, and incorporating the carnival inside the Tractor Race Grounds. Entertainment will be geared toward the 40+ attendance and will be 70sl80s rock and roll with one major headliner on Saturday evening. By expanding the children's activities and altering the entertainment to a contemporary audience, increased media exposure and interest over previous years will be generated. Advertising: Through advertising sponsors advertising will begin August 15, 1998 Proposed Sponsors: The Californian The Bargain Bulletin The Press Enterprise KATY FM Radio KFROG - Sun City San Diego Union FlyerlPlacemats: Posters: Program: Radio/Ticket Promotions: Promotional Partnerships: Proposed 60,000 Flyer Distribution Beginning September 1, 1998 Cooperative posters with Budweiser - throughout southern California. TTA Produced Posters distributed in southwest Riverside County cities. Distributed prior to Labor Day Weekend Souvenir program, to be distributed at the event. and inserted into local newspaper (tba - Press Enterprise has first right of refusal) 36,000 inserted, 4,000 distributed at event. A limited number of tickets will be distributed for radio on-air ticket giveaways in exchange for radio promotions of the Frontier Days Rodeo. Corporate sponsors will be pursued for radio partnership marketing and product sponsored on-air advertising. Cross Promotions & Activities PASlPerris Auto Speedway: Target Race Against Drugs: The Tractor Race will be cross promoted with the Sprint Car/PAS Speedway events held throughout the summer. Plans are underway to incorporate a Tractor Race exhibition at PAS and have sprint cars on display at the t ractor race. This campaign is conducted by Target with Kathy Ireland racing lawnmowers throughout the United States. We will pursue tieing this activity with the Grand Entry Parade. Publicity: Marketing and public relations is being conducted by Melody's Ad Works. Publicity begins in April with calendar notices being mailed to long lead publications, sports writers and entertainment writers. This year the publicity and marketing will be increased to include race enthusiasts and possible cross promotions with Perris Race Track. ESPN II and Extreme Sports programs/media will be pursued heavily beginning in July for coverage of the event. A favorite of local Television anchors, last years tractor race was covered by KTTV Fox and KTLA Channel 5 in Los Angeles through live remote telecasts from the Tractor Race site. Additional coverage was seen on San Diego stations, KABC in Los Angeles and local cable community channels. This year we will challenge network anchors and radio disc jockeys to race each other in a celebrity challenge. FRONTIER DAYS RODEO ATTACI~MENT A TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, 1998 998 Temecula I~od I~un 8 o,ooo frontier Days PI~CA i~odeo $ o,ooo and 1998 Great Temecula Tractor I~ace Promotional &ponsorship $ I 0,000 As the Promotional Sponsor of the Temecula Rod Run, Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo and the 22st Great Temecula Tractor Race, the City of Temecula will assist the Temecula Town Association in preserving the rich heritage of Temecula. From the beginning Temecula has been known for it's pioneer spirit, farms and cattle ranches. A significant part of Temecula's Old Town district, the walking tour, and buildings are tied directly to old west charm. The Temecula Rod Run brings over 40,000 spectators each year to witness Old Town's charm while discovering the many recreational amenities that make Temecula a great weekend desitnation. The Froniter Days PRCA Rodeo exemplifies the Great American Spirit which helped build and preserve Old Town Temecula. The Great Temecula Tractor Race remains to this day the world's most unique event and television broadcasters' favorite Temecula-based event for live news coverage. The Temecula Town Association, dedicated to preserving and promoting Old Town Temecula, is proposing a sponsorship which ties the marketing benefits of the three events into one powerful marketing and publicity tool for the City of Temecula. This proposal includes marketing plans for all three events for the City's consideration. TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL, 1998 AS · · · · · · the "Premier Sponsor" the City of Temecula will receive: Print exposure for City name on all advertisements for all events. City name in all press releases for all events. Prominent exposure to all broadcast media covering the events. Invitations to media days and television news broadcasts. City Flag carried in during the Grand Entry Rodeo Parade City name and recognition as a sponsor in sponsor-related press releases. City banner displayed at all events recognizing the City. Full page, color ad in Great Temecula Tractor Race official program. (40,000 distributed) · City name on Great Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · Full page, color ad in Rod Run official program. (Printed and inserted in the Press-Enterprise) · City name on Rod Run t-shirts · Advertisement in the Frontier Days Rodeo official program. · Name re-inforcement and recognition development through radio promotions for all three events. · Licensing rights to use the event logos of all events, for City marketing program. · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the Great Temecula Tractor Race · 12 VIP Tickets/Passes to the PRCA Rodeo · 15 Great Temecula Tractor Race t-shirts · 15 Rodeo t-Shirts · 15 Rod Run t-shirts · The rights & ability to insert information, brochures and visitor information into the welcome packets of 1,000 classic car owners, 100s of cowboys, and over t00 tractor drivers at the races. · 12 Admission Passes to Tractor Race Casino Night (Chips not included) · 12 Admission Passes to Friday Night Hearts & Rod Dance · 12 Tickets to Saturday Barbecue ATTACHHENT B TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION PROPOSED 1998 BUDGET DEPT. 2 (RODEO) INCOME: Achmssions Beer/Bar Sponsors Vendors TOTAL INCOME 60,000.00 16,000.00 25,000.00 5,000.00 106,000.00 EXPENSES: Advertising & PR Awards Beer/Bar Contingencies Contract Services Ambulance Almouncer Barrel Man Bullfighter/Clown Judges Scoreboard Sound Man Donations-Service Dues & Memberslfip Entertaimnent Equipment Rental Event Insurance Permits Printing Purses Sanitation Security Signs Site Prep Stock Contractor Telephone Trash/Clean Up Work Parties TOTAL EXPENSES 2,000.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 10,000.00 500.00 5,500.00 3,000.00 14,000.00 1,000.00 650.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 2,400.00 500.00 2,000.00 10,500.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 200.00 1,800.00 1,000.00 95,350.00 NET INCOME-PROFIT/(LOSS) 10,650.00 ! 998 rrontier Days i odeo In 1997 The Temecula Town Association resurrected The Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo, one of the longest standing rodeos in Southwest Riverside County. Praised by PRCA officials, stock contractors and cowboys alike for the professionalism and organization of the event, the 1998 Frontier Days Rodeo is sure to draw the nation's top cowboys. Staged during Memorial Day weekend, the 1997 Frontier Days Rodeo hosted 100s of cowboys and drew nearly 10,000 spectators over the weekend. Competitors in each of the seven rodeo events included at least of the nation's top 10 cowboys. Marketing for the Frontier Days Rodeo began in December at the National Finals Rodeo convention in Las Vegas, Nevada. Clowns, bullfighters and the stock contractor are already in place; The following pages outline the marketing campaign planned for the 1998 Frontier Days Rodeo and the audience demographic profile of rodeos, as produced by the PRCA. Advertising: Through advertising sponsors advertising will begin May 1, 1997 Proposed Promotional Partners: The Californian The Bargain Bulletin The Rancho News The Press Enterprise KATY FM Radio KFROG - Sun City Advertising: FlyerlPlacemats: Posters: Program: Tickets: A 4 week campaign will begin April 23 to coincide with the Balloon and Wine Festival. Radio promotions will begin April 28th. Proposed 10,000 Flyer Distribution Beginning April 23, 1998 Cooperative posters with Budweiser - throughout southern California. TTA Produced Posters distributed in southwest Riverside County cities. Distributed prior Balloon and Wine Festival Week Souvenir program, to be distributed at the event. 5,000 copies printed $8.00 general admission tickets to be on sale at the TTA, selected Temecula Outlets Radio/Ticket Promotions A limited number of tickets will be distributed for radio on-air ticket giveaways in exchange for radio promotions of the Frontier Days Rodeo. School Program: Friday, May 22nd Elementary schools from Temecula, Murrieta, Mennifee and Lake Elsinore will be invited to attend a morning rodeo performance and learn about the rodeo first hand, from the cowboys who handle the stock, to the bullfighting rodeo clowns. Children will be taught the history of rodeo and the roots of the many competitions. They will also learn what the PRCA and professional cowboys do to protect and condition their animals. Publicity: Marketing and public relations is being conducted by Melody's Ad Works. Publicity will begin in Pro Rodeo News, the official PRCA newspaper, in February. Additional announcements of the Rodeo, Rodeo Queen Contest, and Sponsorships will begin in late February. press release. Press releases will be sent to regional equestrian/horsemanship publications, as well as sports writers and entertainment writers. FEBRUARY: Announcement to Pro Rodeo News and PRCA Website MARCH: PRESS RELEASES DISTRIBUTED TO SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY Rodeo Queen competition Sponsorship availability Regional event calendar notices for magazines Establish media sponsors Announce sponsors APRIL: Announce events in Regional Publications PSAs to all Radio Stations Announce special entertainment, ie clown, dance PSAs to Cable/Local Television Stations Proposals to ESPN, ESPNII and other television Announce Rodeo Queen Contestants Media Day Invitations MAY: Media Day is scheduled for May 6, 1998 Feature on rodeo contestants/records Feature on history of Frontier Days rodeo and relationship to rodeo history. Feature on rodeo circuit/life on the "road-e-o" Special section on Rodeo inserted into local paper Feature on activities and booths at Rodeo Feature on Rodeo chairman and committee Follow-up on rodeo results TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL ATTACHMENT A TEMECULA VA LLEY BALLOON AND WINE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION, A NON PROFIT CALIFORNIA CORPORATION SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 16th day of January, 1998, by and between the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association, a non profit corporation, herein referred to as ("Association"), organized under the laws of the State of California, and CITY OF TEMECULA. Recitals WHEREAS, Association has the exclusive opportunity to organize and conduct a festival which is to be held April 24-26, 1998 at Lake Skinner Regional Park and Riverside Open-Space District, 37701 Warren Road, Winchester, Riverside County, California and to be known as The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival ("Festival") and; WHEREAS, Sponsor has agreed to provide financial [or in-kind] support for the Festival in exchange for certain promotional opportunities to be granted by Association. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as ibllows: 1. Official Status. Organizer grants to Sponsor the exclusive opportunity during the Term of this Agreement to use Association's designs, artwork and other symbols and devices associated with the Festival ("Association's Trademarks") are and shall remain Association's property and Association shall take all steps reasonably necessary to protect them. Sponsor is hereby authorized to use Association's Trademarks in advertising and promoting its' Products/Services during the Term of this Agreement, provided Association shall maintain the fight to approve such uses in writing in advance. Sponsor shall submit materials to Association in writing and Association shall approve or reject such materials in writing within 7__ business days after receipt thereof'. The opportunity to use Assoeiation's Trademarks is nonexclusive, nonassignable and nontransferable. All uses by Sponsor of Association's Trademarks shall be solely to the benefit of Association. The Sponsor is granted the use of Association's Trademarks while promoting Sponsor's Products/Services as the "Official MARKETING SPONSOR" of the Festival. 2. Marketing. Association may provide the following opportunities to Sponsor during the Term of this Agreement: A. Advertising and Promotion: (1) Opportunity to have Large banner a size and design chosen and approved by the Association, at the following locations: to be decided. Banner created by Association unless agreement to ut'fiize city supplied banner (City option). Banner (if produced by association) to remain the property of Association. (2) Opportunity to have City Name placed in print or sponsor mentioned air time on radio stations placed by The Association in connection with the Festival for electronic advertising. Page 1 of 6 1 / 16/98 spon. doc SPONSORSI~IP AGREEMENT (3) Opportunity to have Sponsor's Trademarks on some flyers, and other marketing pieces used by Association in connection with the promotion of the Festival.; (4) Opportunity for city name in all press releases issued by The Association; (5) If festival program produced by a sponsor, oppommity for 1/2 page color advertising placement in the official Festival Program authorized by The Association. Camera ready artwork to be supplied by sponsor. (6) Opportunity to use film clips and/or video tape of past Festivals for advertising and promotional purposes, subject to Association's prior written approval. (7) Opportunity to be given 100 general admission tickets, 32 VIP tent passes, 12 VIP parking passes, and 20 Glow tickets for the Festival to be used at the Sponsors discretion. (8) Opportunity to receive 24 sets of official Festival souvenirs. City will recevie a 15% discount or the sale price, the lower of two, on souvenirs purchased throughout the year for city officals and guests. (9) Opportunity to sell or give away Sponsors promotional merchandise, defined herein as "Merchandising" in connection with advertising or promoting the Festival, based on the following; B. iMerchandising. (1) Association represents and warrants that all merchandise authorized to bear the Association's Trademarks or to be associated with the Festival shall be of such standard, style, appearance and quality as to suit the best image of the Festival and shall be free from product defects. All Festival Related Merchandise that also bears Sponsor's Trademarks shall, include appropriate notice of any applicable trademark, service mark or copyright relating to Association's Trademarks or Sponsor's Trademarks. Each party shall reasonably determine what constitutes appropriate notice for its respective Trademarks and copyrights. (2) Sponsor shall have the opportunity in connection with its advertising and promotion of Sponsor Products during the term of this agreement, to produce and sell Festival Related Merchandise provided it also bears Sponsor's Trademarks. Such merchandise shall be subject to Association's prior written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. (3) If Sponsor manufactures or causes to be manufactured its own Festival Related Merchandise, Sponsor represents and warrants that such merchandise shall be free from defects. (4) In any agreement between Sponsor and any third party relating to the manufacture, distribution or promotion of Sponsor's Festival Related Merchandise or otherwise relating to the Festival, Sponsor agrees that such agreement will contain a clause substantially similar to the following: Page 2 of 6 1 / 16/98 spon. doe SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT [Third party] will look solely to [Sponsor] for performance and for payment and satisfaction of any obligation or claim arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, and [Third Party] hereby covenants that it will not assert any claim against or look to Festival or any officer, director, employee or representative of Festival for satisfaction of any such obligation or claim. 3. Sponsorship Fee. In consideration of the full performance by Association of all of its obligations hereunder and of all opportunities granted hereunder to Sponsor, Sponsor shall pay to Association the total sum of $25,000 cash value, payable as follows: $25,000.00 on or before February 1, 1998 4. Trademarks. (A) Sponsor' s trademarks, label designs, product identifications, artwork and other symbols and devices associated with Sponsor Products/Services ("Sponsor Trademarks") are and shall remain Sponsor's property and Sponsor shall take all steps reasonably necessary to protect such Sponsor's Trademarks through federal U.S. registrations as it deems desirable and through reasonable prosecution of infringements. The Association is hereby authorized to use Sponsor's Trademarks in advertising and promoting the Festival during the Term of this Agreement granted Sponsor shall have the opportunity to approve all such uses in writing in advance. Association shall submit materials to Sponsor in writing and Sponsor shall approve or reject such materials in writing within seven business days after receipt thereof. The opportunity to use Sponsor's Trademarks is nonexclusive, nonassignable and nontransferable. All uses by Association of Sponsor's Trademark's shall inure solely to the benefit of Sponsor. (B) Association shall not manufacture, sell, or license the manufacture and/or sale of, any promotional or other merchandise which bears Sponsor' s Trademarks without Sponsor's prior written consent. Sponsor shall have the opportunity to manufacture and/or sell promotional or other merchandise which bears Association's Trademarks subject to prior written approval of Association. 5. Warranties. Association and the Sponsor each represents and warrants that: (A) It has the full right and legal authority to enter into and fully perform this Agreement in accordance with its terms without violating the rights of any other person. (B) The respective Sponsor's trademarks do not infringe the trademarks or trade names of any other person; (C) Sponsors and organizers will comply with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances pertaining to the promotion and conduct of the Festival. 6. Indemnity. (A) Each party will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other, its parent, subsidiary and affiliated corporations and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns, from and Page 3 of 6 1/16/98 spon. doc SPONSORSitIP AGREEMENT against any and all claims, damages, liabilities, losses, government proceedings and costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and cost of suit, arising out of any alleged or actual breech of the Agreement or the inaccuracy of any warranty or representation made by it or any act or omission by it in the performance of this Agreement or the purposes hereof. (B) Each party will give the other prompt written notice of any claim or suit possibly coming within the purview of any indenmity set forth in this Agreement. Upon the written request of an indemnitee, the indernnitor will assume the defense of any such claim, demand, action or proceeding. The indemnitee shall also have the opportunity to provide its own defense at its own expense, provided the indemnitee shall not settle any claim without the indenmitor's consent unless it is willing to release the indenmitor from its obligation of indemnity hereunder. Termination of the Agreement shall not affect the continuing obligation of each of the parties under this Paragraph and Paragraph 9. 7. Terms and Termination. (A) This Agreement shall become effective on the date first above written and shall expire on December 31, 1998, unless terminated earlier or renewed pursuant to the terms hereof (the "Term"). (B) Without prejudice to any other opportunities or remedies the Association may have, Association may terminate this Agreement immediately by delivery of notice to Sponsor at any time if any of the following events shall occur: (1) Sponsor shall default under any provision of this Agreement and shall have failed to cure such default within 30 days after it received written notice of such default from Association; or; (2) Any of the representations or warranties made by Sponsor in this Agreement shall prove to be untrue or inaccurate in any material respect. (C) Without prejudice to any other opportunities or remedies that Sponsor may have, Sponsor may terminate this Agreement immediately by delivery of notice to Association if at any time; (1) Association shall default under any provision of this Agreement and shall have failed to cure such default within 30 days after receiving written notice of such default from Sponsor. (2) Any of the representations or warranties made by The Association in this Agreement shall prove to be untrue or inaccurate. 8. Option to Renew. The Association hereby grants to Sponsor the opportunity to renew its Official Sponsorship on the same terms and conditions as contained herein, (except that the Sponsorship Fee described shall be $25,000.00 shall be paid on a mutually agreeable schedule. Sponsor shall exercise said option, by giving The Association written notice within seven days prior to the expiration of the Term of this Agreement. In the event that Sponsor does not exercise such option, Association has the opportunity to pursue other sponsors for the Official Sponsor category (ies). 9. Miscellany. Page 4 of 6 1/16/98 spon. doc SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT (A) Confidentialit),. The parties hereto agree to maintain in confidence the terms and conditions of the Agreement except to the extent that a proposed disclosure of any specific term or conditions hereof by either party is authorized in advance by the other party. (B) No Joint Venture or Partnership. This Agreement shall not be deemed to create a joint venture, partnership, principal-agent, employer-employee or similar relationship between the Association and Sponsor. (C) Itwalidi02. The determination that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable shall not invalidate this Agreement, all of said provisions being inserted conditionally on their being considered legally valid, and this Agreemere shall be construed and performed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision(s) were omitted. (D) Notices. All notices required or permitted to be made under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered or sent by prepaid certified or registered mail. If to 7he Association, to 27403 Ynez Road, Suite 215, Temecula, CA 92591 or such other address as either party may designate in writing to the other party for this purpose (E) Non-~qssignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written approval of the other party, except that Sponsor may assign this Agreement to any entity which acquires substantially all of its assets. (F) Complete Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all other agreements, if any, express or implied, whether written or oral. The Association has made and makes no representations of any kind except those specifically set forth herein. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON and corporation Title: ~]l(~ (O~,rtw.~ Title: WINE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION, a non-profit California SPONSOR: By: Title: Page 5 of 6 1 / 16/98 spon. doc . B ,. Novend)er 1~, 1~7 Ordinary Incomi~.xpe~tle Income Sunday 11ckM ~ $Murday TIGkM Salel Valley Glow Totll AdlTdlMMtl Bever/ge Income Water & Soda Bloody Mary~ & Marg~rltta'a Micro Beer Ticke~ Total Beverage Income Parking Income Souvenir Salee $poneorshh) Venues litcome Electrical Fee Insurance Fee Wine Tickets Entry Fees Cramhie/ion from Vendors ToMI Venues Income Miscellaneous Income Miscellaneous Income - Other Total. Mlacellaneou~ Income · Total Income Coat of Goods Sold Souvenirs Expenses Total COGS GroGs Profit Expense Souvenir Supplies Bank Card Fee Parking Expense Sales Tax Volunteer Expenses Accomodationa Expense Admlsiions Expense County Fee Tickat Printing Expense Total Admisslone Expense Beverage Expense Beverage Suppllee Micro Beer for Tasting Ice Water & Soda Beer Bloody Mary'a Wine By The Glass Total Beverage Expenee Command Command Supplies Radio's Telephone ATTACHMENT Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Budget Report July 1997 through June 1998 TOTAL Jul 'G? - Jun 'le 0.00 17,385.00 827.87 " '827.87 19,487.94 19,487.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 967.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.00 2,000.00 11 ,(X~O.00 8,700.00 37,000.00 130,000.00 3,800.00 10,325.00 4,000.00 143,925.00 716,988.00 1,080.00 1,800.00 2,250.00 Page 49 ovember t3, t997 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Budget Report July 1997 through June 1998 TOTAL Jul '~7 -Jun ~ Entertainment Expense Entertainher Act. Producer Back~. Sup~le~ To~l Entertainment Expense Facilities Expenses Signage Clean.Up Special Equipment Rental Fencing Fuel Generators Golf Carts Ughta Power RV's & Modulars Storage Bins Tables,Chairs,& Booths Tents Toilets Trash Facility Supplies Total Facilities Expense~ Marketing Expense Marketing Media commi~oni' ' Souvenirs for Media Radio Print Marketing Video Cold Air Balloon Flyers Media Day PR Firm Program Collateral Printing Marketing Supplies Marketing Expense - Other Total Marketing Expense Public Safety Expenses Public Safety Supplies Sheriffs Marines Total Public Safety Expenses Sponsor Expenses Sponsor Souvenirs VIP Wine Total Sponsor Expenses Trafilc Expense Venue Expenses Wine For Tasting Venue Supplies Prize Money Total Venue Expenses Operating Expenses Dues .' 0.00 0.00 o.ao 462.05 g4.2g 0.00 O.C)O 0.00 o.ao o. ao o.ao o.oo o.oo 0.00 o.ao o.ao aclo o. oo aoo o.ao o.oo o.oo o.ao 5,130.00 0.00 81,500.00 8,0130.(30 11,500.013 5,500.00 3,870.Q3 110,370.00 10,800.00 5,4013.00 3,6Q::).C)0 9,450.00 1 ,t~:~'0.00 8,263.00 6,192.00 4,500.00 24,750.00 6,930.00 4,945.00 9,000.00 3,150.00 4,050.0O 16,000.00 1,350.(30 15,000.00 24,500.00 3,6CX3.00 1,800.(30 1,350.(30 8,000.00 10,000.00 2,500.00 1,200.00 0.00 3,000.00 17,000.00 13,500.(30 3,aoo.oo 16,500.00 5,000.00 4,117.00 Page Nov(mlber 13, 19~' Sul)~.riptiorm & Publicatlmm GHI~ Irmurance Vendor Inmirance Uab##y Insurance Total In.urance Lea~e Licen~e~ and Perml~ Meala & Entertainment Office Suppii~ P~yroll Expen~e~ Groea Wage~ Payroll Taxe~ Workmen. ~.on Total Payroll Expen~e~ Fh'ofea~Jonal Fee~ Con~ulting ' Total Profe.Monal Fee~ Repairs Equipment Rapmarl Total Repairs · · ** - Seminar~ & Travel * Interest Expense Operating Expenses - Other Total Operating Expen~el Total Expense Net Ordinary income Other Income/Expense 1997 Income Total Other Income Other Expenae Prior Year Coeta Total Other Expense Net Other Income Net Income Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Budget Report July 1997 through June 1998 TOTAL Jul '97. Jun '9~ 596.05 25.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 545.00 10.00 lg9.31 300.g3 642.~ 18,267.34 2,819.13 20,52Z17 410.06 0.00 610.00 0.00 610.00 0.00 '0.00 1,034.00 536.58 1,611.7g 10.00 27,252.10 -9,787.74 945.00 1,340.00 1,800.00 49,860.00 4,478.24 2,676.89 57,015.13 1,7=JO.00 1,3DO.00 1,140.00 1,100.00 2,240.00 · 810.00 3,065.00 1,010.00 2,586.79 0.00 1,516.87 1,516.87 1,040.79 1,040.79 476.08 -8,311.66 105,753.92 591,331.92 Page 61 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Statement of Financial Position As of June 30, 1997 ASSETS Current Assets Checking/Savings First Pacific National Bank Total Checking/Savings Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Total Accounts Receivable Other Current Assets Inventory Prepaid Insurance Total Other Current Assets Total Current Assets Fixed Assets Fixed Assets Accumulated Depreciation Total Fixed Assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES & EQUITY Liabilities Current Liabilities ' Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Total Accounts Payable Other Current Liabilities Payroll Taxes Payable Sales Tax Payable Total Other Current Liabilities Total Current Uabilities Long Term Liabilities Loans Payable Total Long Term Liabilities Total liabilities Equity Net Assets (Unrestricted) Net Income Total Equity TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY Jun 30, '97 36,735.52 36,735.52 13,582.81 13,582.81 4,249.00 15,202.00 19,451.00 69,769.33 23,328.21 (4,824.00) 18,504.21 88,273.54 61,875.05 61,875.05 1,548.34 846.00 2,394.34 64,269.39 12,084.61 12,084.61 76,354.00 23,511.29 (11,591.75) 11,91g.54 88,273.54 DRAFT - Prepared internally without audit Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Statement of Activities July 1996 through June 1997 Jul '96 - Jun '97 Ordinary Income/Expense Income Admie~Jorm 266,927.36 Beverage Income 82,698.51 Parking Income 26,870.59 RV Income 15,488.00 Souvenir Sales 42,559.12 Sponsorship 140,800.00 Venues Income 136,887.10 Prior Year Activity 1,350.49 Total Income 713,581.17 Cost of Goods Sold Souvenirs Expenses Total COGS 39,214.91 39,214.91 Gross Profit Expense Accomodations Expense Admissions Expense Beverage Expense Command Donation Entertainment Expense Facilities Expenses Marketing'Expense Parking Expense Public Safety Expenses Sponsor Expenses Traffic Expense Transportaion Expense Venue Expenses Volunteer Expenses Operating Expenses Total Expense 674,366.26 10,084.07 21,299.76 21,655.76 6,801.22 20.346.74 · o 127,917.74 . 161,101.90 85,488.71 1 692.97 38 746.65 18.815.33 4 887.26 1.387.09 50 984.30 6.466.68 108,281.83 685,958.01 (11,591.75) (11,591.75) Net Ordinary Income Net Income L/Lo~) DRAFT - Prepared internally without audit' Addendum to Marketing Temecula Memo We are working on a number of promotions that would draw attention to the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival and therefore would promote the City of Temecula. I have mentioned these along with the advertising and public relations efforts that are being taken to give you an overview of what our marketing efforts will do for Temecula. Please keep in mind that many of our promotions are still in their development stages. The most important thing to remember about the festival's marketing efforts is, "We cannot market the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival without marketing Temecula". Our goal is to get people to come out to Temecula which hopefully will inspire them to come out at other times when the festival is not in progress. A. A mass distribution list to more than 400 editors, radio and television producers have been developed that will be receiving information about the Temecula Valley. Each of these people will be invited to our Media Day at which time they would get a good taste of Temecula and all it has to offer. Public relations efforts will be ongoing and wide coverage of the event will occur. Our public relations efforts include specialty publications about ballooning, wine and travel. To give you an idea of the distribution's reach, the following is just a taste of some of the stations and publications. Arizona Republic Balloon Life Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Las Vegas Review-Journal Los Angeles 1~mes North County 1~mes Orange County Register San Diego Magazine Circulation 611, 704 Circulation 4, 000 Circulation 87, 422 Circulation 220,295 Circulation 1,457, 583 Circulation 95, 000 Circulation 420, 783 Circulation 53,342 San Diego Union-Tribune Wine Enthusiast Wine Spectator Wine & Spirits KNBC, KABC, KCBS TV NBC 739, KFMB, KGTV TV KABC AM KFI AM KFMB AM KFRG FM KIFM FM KIIS FM Circulation 455,660 Circulation 75, 000 Circulation 148, 000 Circulation $$, 000 Covers all areas within L.A. station Covers all areas within San Diego Co. 5, 000 watts based in Los Angeles 50, 000 watts based in Los Angeles 50, 000 watts based in San Diego 50, 000 watts based in Colton 28, 000 watts based in San Diego 5, 000 watts based in Burbank B. The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival has dedicated itself to buying $40,000 worth of media in the form of prim, radio and possibly some television. The purpose of the media we buy would be to expose people to the Temecula Valley and bring them to the City. The areas we plan to make media buys in include San Diego, Riverside, Los Angeles and Orange coumies. C. In addition to the $40,000 we plan to spend out of our own funds, the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival is seeking bartered media advertising that would supplement our efforts. . The Californian has agreed to provide $5,000 worth of advertising to promote the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. The publication's circulation if 89,634. . The Press-Enterprise has agreed to provide $8,000 worth of advertising and design and print the festival's program that will contain a great deal of information about the Temecula Valley. The total circulation of the Press- Enterprise is 170,478. . The San Diego Union-Tribune has agreed to provide $7,000 worth of advertising in its publication. In addition, the newspaper plans to supply the festival with a four-page insert on Temecula into the "Night & Day" entertainment section in the North County of San Diego. They will also be running an article on the front page of their "Change of Address" Real Estate section about Temecula and all the area has to offer. The article will include information about homebuilders in Temecula. The total circulation of the Union-Tribune is 455,660. . KUSI television has been approached to do a television program about the festival and the City of Temecula. This San Diego station often covers community events and considers Temecula to be a community of San Diego. The half-hour program would likely cover not only the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, but would have information on the Temecula Valley as a whole. e The Orange County Register is being approached to do a special section about the festival in the publication's "Homes" section. Discussion about three bannered pages highlighting the festival and the home developers in the Temecula Valley has been discussed as a distinct possibility. The approximate circulation of the Orange County Register is 450,000. . KABC and KLOS are working on generating $70,000 worth of advertising for the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. Half of those monies will be spent to run advertising of KABC & KLOS, and the remainder will , be spent on other radio stations in San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties. 8. KFRG has been approached to provide the festival radio advertising time. 9. KATY is providing $5,000 worth of radio advertising. D. Vons has been approached to be a discount coupon distribution center. All Vons in Southern California would carry the coupons and provide their customers with information about the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. E. Ontario Mills has agreed to play festival information during the months of March and April on their television system, which can be seen, throughout the mall. This will be a great outlet for spreading the word about Temecula. The information of Temecula will be played once every two hours. The North County Fair is being approached about doing a similar promotion. F. Coco's Restaurant has been approached to do a promotion throughout Southern California where, through a coloring contest, we would be able to spread the word about the Temecula Valley. The prize for the coloring contest winner would be a weekend getaway in Temecula that includes a hot-air balloon ride, admission into the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, and hotel stay. Coco's will be advertising the contest in which they will promote the prize of a "Weekend in Temecula." G. Internet Publicity - An extensive search is being done to locate Internet sites that provide information about events and festivals. Information on the Temecula Valley and the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival is being submitted to each one as they are found. A few of the Internet sites that have been contacted include Sidewalk by Microsoft, Alberta Arts Festival Association, and California Festivals. He Budweiser, as one of our sponsors, has agreed to post custom posters about the festival in Temecula Valley throughout their Southern California distribution sites including San Diego and Orange counties. In addition, they will be advertising on several Los Angeles and San Diego radio stations including KROQ, KCBS, KLOS, KLYX, and KIIS in Los Angeles and EXTRA, KFMB and KPLN in San Diego. These radio commercials will include information about the Temecula Valley. They also plan to launch their new west-coast airship and fly over the Festival during the weekend. This blimp will be featured at the NASCAR race the following weekend. This should give Temecula considerable coverage. Presenting Sponsor - Carriage Motors Company will again be the presenting sponsor which will add corporate sponsorship in advertising, radio and news media, along with local promotions. Glow Sponsor - Paradise Chevrolet once again with provide sponsorship for the "Balloon Glow" on both Friday and Saturday evenings. This event has been and will continue to be marketed by corporate and surrounding communities who have looked forward to this annual event. Paradise has been a supporter of many local events in Temecula, and their advertisements and promotions are seen throughout Riverside and San Diego Counties. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~~'/~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 27, 1998 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of January 27, Redevelopment Department. This report covers housing, redevelopment and economic development. 1998 for the CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director DATE: January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: Monthly Redevelopment Activity Report as of January 27, 1998 Prepared by: John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager First Time Homebuyers Proaram -- · Eighteen families have been funded for FY 97-98. Residential ImDrovement Programs During 1997, the Agency mailed out over 650 flyers advertising the Residential Improvement Program to eligible property owners. An additional 60 applications were mailed out. Since July 1, 1997 842,650.00 in improvements have been requested. Temecula O.N.E. An assessment goal setting meeting has been set for late January to allow the Temecula ONE team to focus on projects for the coming year. The first Crime Free Multi-Housing Program 'social' was held on January 17, 1998 at Rancho West Apartments. Rancho West is the first complex to receive its R:~SYERSIGMO~Y~OHN. JUlq 1/16/98.j~n certification in this program. Twenty of the City's 24 apartments are participating. The Temecula O.N.E. POP II implemented Temecula against graffiti. Temecula Police Department TAG program impact/statistics Year ~ Calls Total cost 1996 57,508 237 ~ 16,102.22 1997 32,951 150 $ 9,125.48 The TAG program began in April 1997. As a result of our enforcement efforts through the TAG program, intelligence gathering, zero tolerance sweeps, information sharing at meetings with School Resource Officers, school maintenance workers, and public works employees we have continued to see a decrease in graffiti vandalism, and the cost involved. To date, we have conducted approximately Ten (10) TAG programs, initially consisting of only POP II Team and COPS Officers from the Temecula Police Department and South West Station. Our second phase included the POP II Team, Reserve Officers from the Temecula Police Department and specially trained citizen volunteers. Our present phase utilizes teams of citizen volunteers coordinated by the POP II Team. Tag related arrests to date are as follows: Fifteen (15) juveniles arrested for misdemeanor crimes including vandalism, possession of marijuana, under the influence of a controlled substance, and public intoxication. Seven (7) juveniles arrested for felony crimes including burglary, possession of stolen property, conspiracy, vandalism, resisting a police officer, and possession of an illegal weapon. Forty (40) citations issued for minors in possession of cigarettes, and/or alcohol. · One (1) adult arrested for public intoxication. · Fifty (50) juvenile contacts which did not result in criminal prosecution. R:~S YE, RS IGMOl',~'HI.~¥~.IOHl~..KJl',I' 1/16/95 jrm North Pujol Redevelooment Proiect The Affirmed Housing Group of Escondido has submitted a preliminary pro forma for the project. Staff met on January 16, 1998 to review preliminary designs for the project. The proposed project will rehabilitate the existing 38 apartment units and develop 18 new units on the vacant acre of land. A formal agreement will be brought back to the Agency in the next few months. OLD TOWN Old Town Streetscaoe Imorovement Proiects On January 7 and 8, 1998, staff invited all Old Town Property Owners who are affected by the project to meet and discuss the proposed improvements. Only nine of forty-seven property owners attended. Staff has contacted several more property owners and set up individual meetings with them. Staff has sent, by certified mail, copies of the improvement plans to the remaining property owners. The property owners contacted by staff have been very supportive of the proposed improvements. F~ade Imorovement Non-Conforming Sign Program Staff has received four new facade improvement applications and has met with several other interested property and business owners. Old Town Ternecula Market Study Keyser Marsten Associates of San Diego was selected to conduct the market analysis at the Agency's January 13, 1998 meeting. A kick-off meeting is scheduled for February 3, 1998. R:~YERSK~ONTHLLY~JOHNJUN l/l~ CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: REGARDING: Executive Director/Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 27, 1998 Marketing Committee Activities Report Economic Development and Tourism Update Prepared by: Barbara McLean, Marketing Technician The Marketing Committee meets bi-monthly. The last meeting was held on November 10, 1997. MEDIA OUTREACH REPORT: Monthly calendar of events and press releases continue to go out to the media. Super Bowl entertainment has been highlighted. Super Bowl events are being planned for the entire family. Events begin on Thursday evening with a Fingerstyle Guitar Mini-Fest held at the Temecula Art Gallery which continues on Friday evening. Also on Friday evening will be a country rock concert featuring Corey Stevens to be held at the Temecula Stampede. Saturday will be Family Day in Old Town and will feature and Chili Cookoff in Sam Hicks Park. During the Chili Cookoff there will be a live remote from KRTM as well as a band playing in the gazebo. There will also be children's games. The Chili Cookoff will be open to restaurants and residents. Also on Saturday a Youth Football Skills Contest will be held at Rotary Park with prizes and trophies for the winning participants. Former NFL player Keith Lee will be on hand to sign autographs. There will also be live entertainment in Old Town on the corner of Main & Front Street. On Sunday there will be a Super Bowl Widow's Fashion Show & Tea at the Temecula Art Gallery and a Super Bowl Party with big-screen TV at the Temecula Stampede. Ads were placed in 2 San Diego newspapers and 3 special Super Bowl tabloids. Numerous calls inquiring about details have already been received as a result. Special gift packets consisting of football-shaped chocolates in a Vintner's wine glass accompanied by a letter from the Mayor outlining Temecula's Super Bowl Events were sent to all destination management companies and concierges at the major hotels in San Diego. We received responses from some recipients expressing their appreciation and indicating that the information would be made available to hotel guests. Local advertising in the Press-Enterprise was provided by KRTM-FM and the Californian, as sponsors of Family Day, donated advertising space as well. KRTM-FM has also been broadcasting all events beginning on January 12. A newsletter was generated by City staff to keep open communications with the merchants and City staff. It was distributed to all Old Town merchants by Kay Williams, who has been hired by the City to help with the Super Bowl event in Old Town. Radio stations KFRG and KATY have also been sent press releases so that PSA's can be announced on the air. Four-color flyers and posters were created in-house and distributed throughout the city. The four-color flyer was also inserted into the Chamber of Commerce newsletter. Press releases have been issued on all the events and several have already been published. TOURISM The City placed a four-color, full-page ad in the San Diego Convention & Visitor's Bureau Visitor's Guide which is distributed through the Visitor's Bureau to all convention attendees, concierges at San Diego hotels and tourists. As members of CONVIS we are taking advantage of various co-op advertising opportunities which reach visitors throughout the San Diego area. The City continues to respond to convention leads provided by CONVIS with a media packet emphasizing Temecula as the perfect destination for a day or a weekend. A writer from LA Parent Magazine is visiting Temecula on the weekend of January 17-18. Information on family activities has been provided and arrangements were made for her stay. The article will appear in the spring edition of the magazine and the distribution will be throughout Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange counties. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Golf shirts, business brochures, and a personal note from Mary Jane McLarney were sent out to attendees of the IDRC conference who filled out special Temecula response cards at the conference. The real estate newsletter was mailed to all IDRC attendees and BIOCOM attendees. As marketing chairperson, Mary Jane McLarney attended the TEAM CALIFORNIA Regional Meeting in Sacramento on Thursday, January 15, 1998. The marketing subcommittee met with economic development publications to research advertising opportunities. WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 CITY ATTORNEY DIR. MANAGER CITY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager January 27, 1998 Financing for Westside Area Public Improvements and Open-Space Acquisition, and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution described below. RESOLUTION NO. 98-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY BACKGROUND: California Government Code requires that, prior to the formation by a public agency of any community facilities district that will finance improvements to be owned and operated by another public agency, the public agencies enter into a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement. The Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") has undertaken proceedings to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "CFD"), and it is proposed that the CFD finance various public improvements to be owned and operated by the City, all as specified in a proposed Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the City and the Authority. The form of the agreement is on file with the City Clerk, and City Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement and that it be executed and delivered by the City Manager, so that the Authority can proceed with the formation of the CFD. FISCAL IMPACT: Attachments: Resolution Joint Community Facilities Agreement RESOLIYrION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MECULA APPROVING A JOINT CO~ FACIIWrIE$ AGREEMENT ~ ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AU'I~OR/TY WIlERE&S, the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") intends to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") in order to finance certain public improvements in the Westside area of the City of Temecula (the "City"), open space acquisitions and to finance a portion of the costs of the Western Bypass, and some of the public improvements to be financed will be owned and/or operated, when completed, by the City (the "Public Improvements"); and ~EAS, in order to enable the District to finance the Public Improvements, Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with respect to the Public Improvements prior to the formation of the District; and wmgREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement, by and between the City and the Authority (the "Agreement") has been filed with the City Clerk and the City Council now desires to approve the Agreement and direct its execution and delivery. NOW, Tl:!l~d~-O~ BE IT ~LVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: A. Approval of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Agreemere, in the form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreemere in such form together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the Agreement. The City Council hereby declares that the Agreement will be beneficial to the residems of the City. B. Official Actions. The City Manager, Finance Director, Director of Public Works, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the Agreement or the formation of the District, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates, documents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. Roao~\9g- I PAS~, APPROV!~ AND ADOS, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] Reso~\98- 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) $S I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Resos\98- 3 JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIF~ AGREEME~ WEST$~E IM2PROVEM2ENT AUTItORITY COMMUNITY FACIIWrlES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) This ~oim Community Facilities Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of January 27, 1998, is by and between the Westside Improvement AuthoriF (the ~Authority~) and the City of Temecula (the "Participating Agency'). WITNESSETH: Wi~'2REAS, the Authority has undertaken proceedings to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "CFD"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code, and to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") under the Act in order to finance various public improvements necessitated by the development of the Westside Area of the City of Temecula and otherwise to finance a portion of the costs of the Western Bypass and open space acquisitions (collectively, the "Project"); and wm~&S, the Project includes the construction of the public improvements described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Exhibit is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and WltlgRF.,AS, the parties hereto desire that the Participating Agency own and operate the Impmven~nts upon their completion if they comply with the standards and are completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and WltEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joim community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which Impmveanents are to be financed, in part, with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and WlW~REAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds and the Improvements, all as more particularly set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. The Authority will reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an arnotrot necessary to finance the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and consrotation of the Improv~ts which are not being funded from other sources, as detennined by the Public Works Director of the Participating Agency. Said amount, together with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in the Improvemere Fund established for the CFD (the "Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amoum shall in no way be pledged as security for the Bonds. Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Section 2. Construction of Improvements. The Authority shall cause the Improvements to be consuucted pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency. All construction shall be done by independent contractors, and neither the Participating Agency nor the Authority shall have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in connection therewith; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities other than the Authority in respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements. Section 3. Inspee_ tion and Acceptance: Use of Bond Funds. The Participating Agency shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion of such construction to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the Improvements in aceordaxw, e with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and responsibility of operation, of the Improvements. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any of the Improvements. Following the acceptance by the Participating Agency of the Improvements, the Authority shall disburse the proceeds of the Bonds described in Section 1 above to pay or reimburse payment of the costs thereof. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Authority may disburse such amounts to pay costs of construction of the Improvements prior to completion of all of the Improvements, if it determines that such disbursement is permissible under the Act and will reduce the overall costs of construction of the Improvements. Section 4. Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvemere Fund and identified in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable hereunder. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder shall be to inspect and accept the Improvements as described in Section 3 above. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to their acceptance by the Participating Agency. If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the conunencement of an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations. Section 5. 1.01JIlill~itlll. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall tenninam if the Bonds are not issued by December 31, 1998. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements by the Participating Agency, and disbursement from the Improvement Fund of the amount described in Section 1 above by the AuthoriF to pay or reimburse a portion of the total costs of the Improvements. Section 6. No Obligation to Form CFD: Agreement of Benefit tO Residelite. The provisions of this Agreemere shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD. Notwithstarding the foregoing, by their respective approvals of this Agreemere, the Authority and the Participating Agency have each declared and hereby confirm that this Agreement is beneficial to the residents of the City in assuring the provision of financing for a portion of the costs of the Improvements in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Section 7. Partial Invalidity_. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein. Section 9. Execution in Countera_arts. This Agreement may counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. be executed in IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature below. Date of Execution: January 27, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA (the ''Participating Agency'') By: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Date of Execution: January 27, 1998 WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY (the "Authority") Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ATTEST: Jun¢S. Greek, CMC/AAE Secretary Peter Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A IMPROVEMENTS TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA PART I ~- DESCRIPION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) FACILITIES The pl.anned public improvements include the following: acquisition of open space, acquisition and/or construction of the Western By-Pass corridor, portions of Vincent Moraga Drive, portions of Ridge Park Drive, and portions of First Street. The improvements shall include all related clearing and grubbing, grading and appurtenances, and any removals or temporary signage or markings related thereto. All improvements may include any rights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, acquisition, construction, locating and/or relocating of utilities (including but not limited to, water, sewer, storm drains and other utilities), landscaping, lighting, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the rights-of-way. The planned public improvements include the acquisition and/or construction of parking facilities, including land acquisition, easement acquisition, entitlement acquisition, grading, site fencing, street improvements (including any rights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-Paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, locating and/or relocating utilities, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the rights-of-way), storm drains (including trenching, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, manholes, headwalls, junctions, transitions, bedding, culverts, and appurtenances), landscaping improvements, site concrete, iron works, gas line repair, curbing, gutters, sidewalks, striping, traffic signals, street lights, light fixtures, and site electrical, all within or in the vicinity of the District. The facilities shall include all costs of engineering, design, fees, permits, bonds, supervision, planning, construction staking, materials testing and coordination incident thereto. The-facilities shall include lafid acquisition related to any public improvement, and other land acquisition for public purposes (including but not limited to open space and land for future public improvements). SERVICES The maintenance of open space within or in the vicinity of the District. OTHER Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, financial advisor, appraisals, reserve fired, capitalized interest, bond counsel, underwriter's counsel, special tax consultant, bond and official statement printing and all other incidental expenses. :\ T~old town\TReport.doc 3 January 2, 1998 PART H COST ESTIMATE WESTSIDE IMPROdeNT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACIL~S DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) The estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of financing the proposed facilities, including the cost of acquisition of lands,-rights-of-way and easements and any physical facilities required in conjunction therewith, and incidental expenses in connection with said financing, including the cost of proposed bond financing and all other related costs as povided in Section 53345.3 of the Act are as follows: COST ESTIMATE ACQUISITION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION Right-Of-Way and Open Space Western By-Pass corndot Portions of Vincem Moraga Drive Portions of Ridge Park Drive Portions of First Street Total Acquisition and Construction $ 5,800,000 g,$00,000 2,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 $18,100,000 INCIDENTALS (including Engineering, Design, Fees, Permits, Bonds, Supervision, Planning, Construction Staking, Materials Testing and Coordination) Total Incidentals $ 2,700,000 OTHER City Administrative Costs Bond Underwriting and Registration Special Tax Consultation Fees Legal Fees, including Bond Counsel Trustee, Appraisal and Registration Bond Reserve Fund Capitalized Interest Total Other 50,000 600,000 20,000 300,000 30,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 $ 7,000,000 CONTINGENCY ,200,000 TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ 29.000,000 PART III PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT The proposed District is generally located west of Interstate 15, and south of Rancho California Road, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERSOF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT: Assessor's Parcel Number Acreaee 940-310-013 27.47 940-310-044 0.88 940-310-045 6.26 940-310-046 4.30 940-310-047 6.29 940-310-048 3.31 940-320-001 20.40 940-320-002 20.33 940-320-003 18.81 940-320-004 19.61 Total Acreage _127,(36_ OWNER OF RECORD* OF ALL PARCELS John F. Firestone 10392 Ladera Senda Santa Ana, California 92705 * By Reference to Riverside County Assessor's records :\ T~01d town\TReport.doc 5 January 2, 1998 II I I I FIRST AMENDED BOUNDARY MAP WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES ~DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) GOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF GALIFORNIA ROGERSDALE PROJECT $~TE Pf~OP~-f~ TY BOUND,~ t~ Y V C N TY No/ {o £cole PROJECTED TOWNSHIP; TBS R,3W /ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING · CIVIL I:'NOINEERING LAND SURV~:YING FIRST AMENDED BOUNDARY MAP WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1"=500' REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.1 (ROGERSDALE AREA), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA." FILED THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997, AT THE HOUR OF B:00 O'CLOCK A.M. IN BOOK 42 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT AT PAGE 6,3(SERIAL# 464325), IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF'RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH THIS FIRST AMENDED BOUNDARY MAP SUPERCEDES. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, THIS__ DAY OF 1998. SECRETARY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING THE FIRST AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO,1 _(ROGERSDALE AREA), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, AT A MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE DAY OF.~ 1998, BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. SECRETARY FILED THIS DAY OF .,1998 AT THE HOUR OF~O'CLOCK .M., IN BOOK__OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, PAGE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. LEGEND ~:~DISTRICT AREA BOUNDARY LINE COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS OF PARCELS INCLUDED IN DISTRICT: 940-310-013 940- 31 O- 044 940-510-045 940-310-046 940- 310-047 940-310-048 940-320-001 940-320-002 940-520-003 940-520-004 REFERENCE THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL LINES AND DIMENSIONS PROJECTED TOWNSHIP; TBS RSW ENGINEERING VENTURES, INC. LAND PLANNING · CIVil E:NGINEERING LAND ~JRVEYING CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINAN CITY MANAGER WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Authority Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director January 27, 1998 Financing for Westside Area Public Improvements and Open-Space Acquisition, and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors conduct concurrent public hearings on (i) the formation of the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") and the levy of special taxes therein, and (ii) the issuance of bonded indebtedness of the Authority for the District. The Board of Directors should: (a) open the public hearings, (b) accept any written protests and take any oral testimony, (c) determine that certain land initially included in the boundaries of the District should be removed from the District, that maintenance of open space will not be funded by the District and whether or not transient occupancy taxes and/or sales taxes arising from development in the District will be used to offset special taxes levied by the District, (d) close the public hearings, (e) adopt the resolutions described as 1, 2 and 3 below, (f) hold the election called pursuant to the resolution listed as 3 below, (g) adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election, and (h) have the first reading of the ordinance described below. The Resolutions proposed for adoption and the ordinance proposed for a first reading are as follows: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT t Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN 5. Have the first reading of an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) BACKGROUND: The Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the financing of: (a) public improvements in the Westside area of the City, (b) certain open space acquisitions, and (c) a portion of the costs of the Western Bypass. On December 9, 1997, the Authority adopted two resolutions of intention relative to a proposed community facilities district (the "District"). The resolutions of intention called for public hearings on the formation of the District, the levy of special taxes therein and the issuance of bonded indebtedness for the District, and provided that the public hearings called pursuant to the resolutions of intention would be held on January 27, 1998. The Secretary of the Authority has published notice of the hearings in accordance with applicable law. The Board of Directors will hold the public hearings concurrently. At the hearings, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of the specified types of facilities to be financed by the District and the issuance of bonds for the District must be heard. Any person interested is authorized to file a protest in writing. As the land proposed to be included in the District is all owned by John Firestone and there are no registered voters residing in the proposed District, only Mr. Firestone has legal standing to formally protest the formation or any particular aspects of the District. A report has been filed by the Director of Public Works of the City with the Authority Secretary, as required by the resolutions of intention, indicating the proposed boundaries of the District, the facilities to be financed by the District and the estimated costs thereof. The land to be included in the District will only include land owned by John Firestone which is expected to be conveyed to or leased by Trigger Entertainment and Sports LLC ("Trigger"). Mr. Firestone and Trigger have requested that certain land included within the original boundary map of the District now be excluded from the District, and a revised boundary map for the District with such land excluded has been filed with the Secretary. The Board of Directors should acknowledge, at the public hearings, the exclusion of such land that was originally within the District boundaries. During the public hearings, the Board of Directors also needs to consider the possible use of a portion of the transient occupancy taxes and sales taxes arising from the facilities to be constructed in the District, as an offset to the special taxes to be levied in the District. The Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Taxes for the District will need to include language to provide for such an offset, if the Board of Directors decides that such a contribution of City funds is appropriate. Later City Council action will be needed to fully implement any such contribution. In any event, the Board of Directors needs to determine the matter of whether or not transient occupancy taxes and sales taxes will be used as offsets to special taxes prior to the close of the public hearings. Also prior to the close of the public hearings, the Board of Directors should acknowledge that the District will not be used to fund the maintenance of any open space acquired with District funds. It is expected that Trigger will fund an endowment for the maintenance of the open space, so that the cost of maintenance need not be included in the taxing powers of the District. Following the closing of the public hearings, Trigger has requested that the Authority take the actions necessary to officially form the District, to authorize the levy of special taxes in the District and to authorize the incurrence of bonded indebtedness by the District. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt resolutions of formation and of necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, and calling a special election of the landowner in the District. A ballot for the election has already been delivered to the eligible landowner voter, and is expected to have been returned to the City Clerk, acting as Secretary of the Authority, prior to January 27th. By law, the landowner is given one vote for each acre of land or portion thereof that he owns within the boundaries of the District. As stated above, the only eligible voter is John Firestone, as the owner of all of the land within the boundaries of the District, as such boundaries are indicated on the amended boundary map for the District on file with the Authority Secretary. The City Clerk, as Secretary to the Authority, will be requested to canvass the election immediately after adoption of the resolution calling the election. If two thirds or more of the votes cast are in favor of the District, the Authority is then requested to adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election and providing for the recording of a notice of special tax lien with the County Recorder. The notice provides all future property owners with knowledge of the existence of the Authority's special taxing powers. The Authority is then requested to have the first reading of an ordinance levying special taxes. The ordinance permits special taxes to be levied only on property located in the District. It is expected that special taxes will be levied to pay debt service on bonds proposed to be issued for the District. Staff expects that a resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds and approving the related legal documents will be presented to the Authority on or after January 27th. Attachments: Resolutions (4) Ordinance Notice of Special Tax Lien RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A ~LUTION OF Tl~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEM]~ AU'I~O~ OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AU'I~O~ COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (RogersDale Area), AUTtIORIZING ~ I.~VY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN ~ DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARH.Y ESTABLISItING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING I.EVY OF ~ SPECIAL TAX AND ~ ESTABLISHMENT OF TI~ APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TOTHI~ QUAL~'I~:I~ E~ECTORS OF ~ DISTRICT wm~E&S, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Pan 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and W'BER~:.a,S, the Re~lution of Intention, incorporating a map of the proposed boundaries of the District and stating the facilities and services to be provided, the estimated maximum cost of providing such facilities and services, and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with respect to the District, is on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and WltI~,F. AS, on this date, this Board of Directors held a public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed formation of the District; and WHE~AS, at said hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the facilities to be provided therein and the levy of said special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and Wl~REAS, at said hearing evidence was presented to this Board of Directors on said matters before it, including a report by the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula (the "Report") as to the facilities to be provided through the District and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of Directors at the conclusion of said hearing is fully advised in the premises; and Reao~\WIA.98- I WHEREAS, at the request of the proponent of the District, the Board of Directors determined at the public hearing to exclude certain territory from the District, and a revised boundary map for the District (the "Revised Map") has been prepared which reflects only that territory to now be included in the District and which Revised Map is on file with the Secretary, and the Board of Directors determined at the public hearing that no services are intended to be funded by the District; and WI:IEREAS, written protests with respect to the formation of the District, the furnishing of specified types of facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes have not been filed with the Secretary by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or property owners of one-half (lb) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and WHEREAS, the special tax proposed to be levied in the District to pay for the proposed facilities to be provided therein, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (lb) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, it was determined that the territory to be included in the District be revised to be as reflected in the Revised Map, and the Rate and Method of Apportionment be revised to be as reflected in Exhibit A hereto, copies of which Revised Map and Exhibit have been provided to the representatives of the landowner in the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The proposed special tax to be levied within the District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act. Section 3. All prior proceedings taken by this Board of Directors in connection with the establishment of the District and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the requirements of the Act. On December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted Local Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts, and this Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the District is in conformity with said goals and policies. Section 4. The community facilities district designated "Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)" is hereby established pursuant to the Act. ~\WIA.98- 2 Section 5. The boundaries of the District, as set forth in the Map of the District heretofore recorded in the Riverside County Recorder's Office in Book 42 at Page 63 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, are hereby revised to reflect the boundaries shown in the Revised Map. The Revised Map is hereby approved, is incorporated herein by reference and shall be the boundaries of the District. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record the Revised Map with the County Recorder as soon as practicable following the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A to the Resolution of Intention and by this reference incorporated herein (the "Facilities"). No services will be funded by the District. Section 7. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to finance the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be levied annually within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the District, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the probable maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 8. It is hereby found and determined that the Facilities are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development occurring in the District. Section 9. The Director of Finance of the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6430 is the officer which will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act. Section 10. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the Authority ceases. Section 11. In accordance with Section 53325.7 of the Act, the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the District is hereby preliminarily established at $10,000,000 and said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the voters of the District as hereafter provided. The proposition establishing Ro~o~\W~.9~- 3 said annual appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors voting thereon and shall be adjusted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 53325.7 of the Act. Section 12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election the time, place and conditions of which election shall be as specified by a separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Section 13. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSEB, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: Steven I. Ford, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] R~o~\WIA.98- 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary Reaos\WIA.9g- 5 EXHIBIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A Special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Treasurer of the Authority (the "Treasurer") through the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall bc taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and .procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes-at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX The maximum special tax that may be levied commencing with the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1998 and for each following Fiscal Year on any Parcel shall not exceed the sum of: plus (i) (ii) The maximum building special tax rate of $9.00 per building square foot, multiplied by the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; The maximum land special tax rate of $3.00 per land square foot, multiplied by the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax shall be levied annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government Code. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES: On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special tax on the County's secured tax roll, the Treasurer shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Property. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1 and on the status of the buildings in the District as of the March 1 preceding such July 1. ~ LEVY: The Treasurer shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the Fiscal Year commencing such July I, and levy of each Parcel of Taxable Property as provided below. Step 1' Determine the Building Floor Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 2: Calculate the annual building special tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 80% of the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3: Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of: (i) the annual building special tax rate calculated in Step 2 above; or (ii) the maximum building special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4: Determine the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 5: Calculate the annual land special tax rate as the lesser of: (i) the Special Tax Liability, less the total amount calculated for all Parcels under step 3 above, divided by the total Land. Area for all Parcels which are Taxable Property; or (ii) the maximum land special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year-commencing such July 1. Step 6: Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, by the annual land special tax rate determined under Step 5, above. Step 7: Calculate the sum of the annual building special tax (fi'om Step 3) and the annual land special tax (from Step 6) for each Parcel which is Taxable Property. _ PREPAYMENTS Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A- particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Treasurer in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. Determination of the total amount needed by the Treasurer shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel. The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Treasurer, .as follows: ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A2 1. Compute the special tax for the then current Fiscal Year for such Parcel and the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. 2. The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all Parcels for the then current Fiscal Year, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special taxes for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). 3. The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Treasurer to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Treasurer to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and Co) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFINITIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel, any fees of the County or the City related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an alloeable share of the salaries of the Authority and/or City staff directly related thereto, a proportionate amount of Authority and/or City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority, from its own funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. ..\CFD lrogersda!¢ Friday, January 02, 1998 A3 Building Floor Area means the area, by square feet rounded up to the nearest whole integer, ,' included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of a multiple story building, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined he~re as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Treasurer by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Treasurer shall determine applicable. City-means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calendar year_ which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. District means the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area). Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented fxom time to time. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance o f Bonds. - Treasurer is the Treasurer of the Authority, who is also the Finance Director of the City. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Treasurer, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District which is not otherwise exempt from the special tax pursuant to law, except that the following property shall · .\CFD ! rogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 not be taxed: any acres of land (up to an aggregate of the first 20.0 acres first so designated by the Treasurer) which is a public right of way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement, or which is owned by a government entity or agency. Taxable Property includes Parcels owned by a public agency if the public agency has granted a leasehold or possessory interest therein to a non-exempt person or entity. ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A5 RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A ~LUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ WEST~E IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETERMINING ~ NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACH,ITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMI'ITING PROPOSITION TO ~ QUALIFIED EI,~CTORS OF THE DISTRICT wm~&S, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness") stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the District for the purpose of financing the costs of certain facilities specified in the Resolution of Intention; and WItEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held a noticed public heating as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District, the provision of facilities and services by the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the costs of the services, the facilities and the principal and interest on the proposed indebtedness and the administrative costs of the City relative to the District; and WItEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the provision of said facilities (the "Facilities") and services and the levy of the special tax on property within the District were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WItEREAg, at said hearing, the Board of Directors determined to eliminate the funding of services by the District, and to eliminate certain territory from the District as shown in a revised boundary map for the District on file with the Secretary; and WltEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution Ro~o~\WIA.98- I entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District" (the "Resolution of Formation"); and WItEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held the rescheduled public hearing relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness; and WHEREAS, no written protests with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness have been filed with the City Clerk. NOW, Ti~.REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. This Board of Directors deems it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000 within the boundaries of the District. Section 3. The indebtedness is incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, as provided in the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling bonds to firmnee the Facilities and the costs of the Authority in establishing and administering the District. Section 4. The whole of the District shall pay for the bonded indebtedness through the levy of the special tax. The tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the formula set forth in Exhibit "A" to the Resolution of Formation. Section 5. The maximum amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred is $30,000,000 and the maximum term of the bonds to be issued shall in no event exceed forty (40) years. Section 6. The bonds shall bear interest at rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by this Board of Directors or its designee at the time or times of sale of said bonds. Section 7. The proposition of incurring the bonded indelXedness heroin authorized shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District and shall be consolidated with elections on the proposition of levying special taxes within the District and the establishment of an appropriatiom limit for the District pursuant to Section 53353.5 of the Act. The time, place and conditions of said election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Reso~\WIA.9$- 2 Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOS, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Steven J. Ford, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] l~oa\WIA.9g- 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) $S I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98-. was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: BOARDMEMBERS: NOBS: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary Resos\WIA.98- 4 RESOLIYYION NO. WIA 98-._ A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION Wl~EREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled ~A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the Distrieff (the ~Resolution of FormationS), ordering the formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "Districff), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the District and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District; WI~REAS, on this date, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within The Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)~ (the ~Resolution to Incur Indebtedhesse), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000 upon the security of said special tax to be levied within the District; and WItF_,REAS, pursuant to the provisions of said resolutions, the propositions of the levy of said special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District as required by Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, co~ing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the 'Act'). NOW, TI~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Sections 53326, 53351 and 53325.7 of the Act, the issues of the levy of said special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election called therefor as provided below. Section 2. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the three propositions described in paragraph 1 above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A~ and by this reference incorporated herein. Said form of ballot is hereby approved. Section 3. This Board of Directors hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory of the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the 98~ 1 close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Board of Directors for the purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Board of Directors finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners within the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners or their authorized representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the District as of the close of said public hearings. Section 4. This Board of Directors hereby calls a special election to consider the measures described in paragraph 2 above, which election shall be held in the Temecula City Council Chambers immediately following adoption of this Resolution. The Secretary is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the Secretary has on file the Resolution of Formation, a certified map of the revised boundaries of the District, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to determine the boundaries of the District. The voted ballots shall be returned to the Secretary no later than immediately following the adoption of this Resolution; and when all of the qualified voters have voted the election shall be closed. Section 5. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by hand-delivered ballot pursuant to Section 4000 of the California Elections Code. This Board of Directors hereby finds that paragraphs (a), (b), (c) (1) and (c)(3) of said Section 4000 are applicable to this special election. Section 6. This Board of Directors acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered to each of the qualified electors of the District a ballot in the form set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. Each ballot indicates the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner to which it pertains. Each ballot was acco~ed by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. The envelope to be used to return the ballot was enclosed with the ballot, had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the landow~r, Co) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration pursuant to clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board. Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures are hereby waived, as provided in Section 53327 of the Act. Section 7. The Secretary shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the Temecula City Council Chambers upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether said ballots be personally delivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available ballots which may be marked at said location on the election day by said qualified electors. Re.~n\WIA 98- 2 Section 8. This Board of Directors hereby further finds that the provision of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified electors of the District. There is on file with the Secretary a written petition executed by all of the qualified electors of the District requesting a shortening of the time for said special election to expedite the process of formation of the District and waiving any requirement for analysis and arguments in connection with the election. Accordingly, this Board of Directors finds and determines that said qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and waiver of analysis and arguments, and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Board of Directors also finds and determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election. Section 9. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish in a newspaper of general circulation circulating within the District a copy of this resolution and a copy of the Resolution to Incur Indebtedness, as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Steven J. Ford, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] Reao~\WIA 98- 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Rc~lution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary ~\WIA 98- 4 EXHIBIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) OFFICIAL BALLOT SPECIAL TAX ELECTION (January 27, 1998) This b~dlot is for a special, landowner elecfia~ You nmst return this b~dlot in the enclosed postage paid envelope to the office of the Secretary of the Wostsido lmprovotnott Authority no later than immediately after adoption of the resolution of the Board of Directors calling said election on Jmmary 27, 1998, ~ther by mail or in person. The Seoretary's office is located at 43200 Business Park Drive, Terncoda, California 92590. To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting lira ~ the word "YES" or after the word "NO". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly m~k, te~x, or doface ~ I~dlot, rerum it to the Seerots~ of the Westside lmlnovomont Authodty taxi oblain mx~hor. BALLOT MEASURe: Shall the Westside Impmvomont Authority incur an indebtodm~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g~ ~~ ~ of ~U~by hw ~ ~ ~ of~ of~~ ~~of~ W~ l~v~ A~ C~~ F~'~ D~ No. 1 ~ogo~& ~) (~ "~"), ~ ~ of w~h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bv~ ~y ~n ~ ~ ~ D~ ~ ~y f~ ~ ~ of~ ~~ ~by ~ D~, ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ u~n such~ ~ ~ ~ of~ Ci~ ~T~ ~ ~ A~fi~ ~ ~mlni~ ~ D~tfi~, ~ s~ ~ ~ ~~m limit of ~ D~tfi~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ of $10,~,~? By execution in the spee, e provided below, yon ,dso (&) certify tlmt yon ,~e the fee title ownor (or the duly ~ a~a~eet~tive of the fee title owner) of the Riverside County Assessors Parcels indicated below, (b) indicate your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the amduot of the eleotion taxi ~ny requirement for mudysis mxl ~rgumoms with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are deec~ and permi~e-i_ by Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the C,difomia Govmmnett Code, and (c) aeimowledgo that there will be no services funded by the District, and that the bomxlar~ of the District will include only that territory set forth on the revised boumtary map for the District, a copy of which has been furnished to you. Numbor of Vo~: 128 940-310013; 940-310-044; 940-310-045; 940-31~; 940-310-047; 940-310-O48; 940-320-001; 940-320-(X)2; 940-320-003; sxd 940-320-004 By: John F. Firestone Re.~o~\WIA 98- 5 RESOLUTION NO. WIA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THF~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ WESTSIDE ]MPRO~~ AU'I~O~ DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL EI.!Z. CTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN ~, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Board of Directors pursuant to Ch~ter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Tifie 5, commencing with Section 5331 l, of the California Government Code (the "Act"), this Board of Directors on this date adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Calling Special Election", calling for a special election of the qualified electors within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. I (RogersDale Area) (the "District"); and WHI~REAS, pursuant to the terms of said resolution, which are by this reference incorporated herein, said special election was held on this date, and the Secretary has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WltlV. REAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed said canvass and hereby approves it. NOW, T!:W. REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The issues presented at said special election were the incurring of a bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000, the levy of a special tax within the District to be levied in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment heretofore approved by this Board of Directors by its resolution adopted this date entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District", and the approval of an annual appropriations limit of not to exceed $10,000,000 pursuant to said resolution. Section 2. Pursuant to said Canvass on file with the Secretary, the issues presented at said special election were approved by the qualified electors of the District by more than two-thirds of the votes cast at said special election. Section 3. Pursuant to said voter approval, the District is hereby declared to be fully formed with the authority to incur bonded indebtedness and to levy special taxes as heretofore provided in these proceedings and in the Act. Ro~o~\WlA.98- 1 Section 4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this Board of Directors with respect to the District were valid and in conformity with the Act. Section 5. The Secretary is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Act, said recording to occur no later than fifteen days following adoption by the Board of Directors of this Resolution. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Steven J. Ford, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] Ro~o~\WIA.9~- 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary Resos\WIA.98- 3 EXHIBIT A CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESLILT OF ELECTION WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Commnnity Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) I hereby certify that on January 27, 1998, I canvassed the returns of the election held on January 27, 1998, in the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) and the total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct: Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) Special Tax Election, January 27, 1998. Qualified Votes Landowner Cast Votes YES NO BAtLDTMFA$~: Shall the Westside Improvement Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not m exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facil'~des District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), the proceeds of which will be used to timme certain public improvements described in the proceedings to form the District; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the DisU~ be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the cost of facilities authorized to be financed by the District, and the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the City of Temecula and the Authority in administering the District, and shall the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $10,000,0007. IN W1TNES~ WHERF_.~F, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 27th day of January, 1998. June Greek, CMC/AAE Authority Secretary Resos\WIA.98- 4 ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE INPROVEMENT AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES ~¥1THIN ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSD~!.F. AREA) WHEREAS, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to establish the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"), to finance certain facilities and services (the "Facilities" and the "Services," respectively); Wm~REAS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the Facilities and Services; WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has held a noticed public hearing as required by Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance a portion of the costs of the Facilities and Services; W31RREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, a community facilities district report was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held; WI~REAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors eliminated the funding of the Services and some of the territory from the District; WHEREAS, also subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District" (the "Resolution of Formation"), "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedrr~ Within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)" and "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvemere Authority Calling Special Election", which resolutions establi~ed the District, authorized the levy of a special tax with the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of Ordl\98- I incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively; and W'!~REA$, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rates and in accordance with the method of apportionment set forth in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Formation (the "Rme and Met3od of Apportionment"). The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1998-99 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the "Bonds"), payment of all costs of the Facilities to be paid with such funds, and payment of all costs administering the District. Section 2. The Finance Director of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 3. Properties or entities of the State, federal or local governments shall he exempt from any levy of the special taxes, to the extent set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. In no event shall the special taxes he levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 4. All of the collections of the special tax shall he used as provided for in the Act, the Rate and Method of Apportionment, and in the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the replenishment of the reserve fund for the Bonds, the payment of the costs of the Facilities, the payment of the costs of the Authority in administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. Section S. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the secured real property tax roll in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessm~ information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of Riverside and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District. O~ds\98- 2 Notwi~ing the foregoing, the Finance Director of the City may collect one or more installments of the special taxes by mem~ of direct billing by the Authority of the property owners within the District, if, in the judgment of the Finance Director, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. In such event, the special taxes shall become delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners. Whether the special taxes are levied in the manner provided in the first or the second preceding paragraph, the special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. Section 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. Section 7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Temecula. PASS~r~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Steven J. Ford, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE Authority Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] Ot, ds\98- 3 STATE OF CAHFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. ~ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE Authority Secretary/City Clerk Ord~\98- 4 RECORDING REOUESTED BY AND AFTER RECORDATION RETURN TO: Secretary Westside Improvement Authority P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WESTSIDE IMPROVEblENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACH~rrIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROC. I~tSD~T~ AREA) Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 53311, et. seq., of the California Government Code (the "Act"), the undersigned Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority"), County of Riverside, State of Califomia, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the Board of Directors of the Authority, County of Riverside, State of California. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds of which are being used to finance the public facilities described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and otherwise to pay the costs of such facilities directly, and the costs of administering the below-mentioned community facilities district. The special tax is authorized to be levied within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), which has now been officially formed and the lien of the special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied, and canceled in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the California Government Code. The rate, metl~ of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special tax is as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Conditions under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien of the special tax canceled are as set forth in said Exhibit B. Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all nonexempt real property within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The name(s) of the owner(s) and the assessor's tax parcel number(s) of the real property included within this community facilities district and not exempt from the special tax are as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Reference is made to the first amended boundary map ofthe community facilities district recorded at Book . of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page , in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which map is the boundary map of the community facilities district. For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property or interests therein subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Director of Finance of the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909)'694-6430. Dated: , 1998 By: Authority Secretary Westside Improvement Authority EXHIBIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) DESCRIFFION OF FACRJTIE$ TO BE FINANCED BY ~ DISTRICT FACILITIES The planned public improvements include the following: acquisition of open space, acquisition and/or construction of the Western By-Pass corridor, portions of Vincent Moraga Drive, portions of Ridge Park Drive, and portions of First Street. The improvements shall include all related clearing and grubbing, grading and appurtenances, and any removals or temporary signage or markings related thereto. All improvements may include any rights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, locating and/or relocating utilities, landscaping, lighting, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the rights-of-way. The planned public improvements include the acquisition and/or construction of parking facilities, including land acquisition, easement acquisition, entitlement acquisition, grading, site fencing, street improvements (including any rights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, locating and/or relocating utilities, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the rights-of-way), storm drains (including trenching, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, manholes, headwalls, junctions, transitions, bedding, culverts, and appurtenances), landscaping improvements, site concrete, iron works, gas line repair, curbing, gutters, sidewalks, striping, traffic signals, street lights, light fixtures, and site electrical, all within or in the vicinity of the District. The facilities shall include all costs of engineering, design, fees, permits, bonds, supervision, planning, construction staking, materials testing and coordination incident thereto. The facilities shall include land acquisition related to any public improvement, and other land acquisition for public purposes (including but not limited to open space and land for future public improvements). OTHE~ Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, financial advisor, appraisals, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond counsel, underwriter's counsel, special tax consultant, bond and official statement printing and all other incidental expenses. WESTSIDE IMI~OVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Treasurer of the Authority (the "Treasurer") through the application-of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and .procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX The maximum special tax that may be levied commencing with the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1998 and for each following Fiscal Year on any Parcel shall not exceed the sum of: plus (i) (ii) The maximum building special tax rate of $9.00 per building-square foot, multiplied by the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; The maximum land special tax rate of $3.00 per land square foot, mtiltiplied by the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax shall be levied annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax- for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California' Government Code. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES: On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special tax on the County's secured tax roll, the Treasurer shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Property. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1 and on the status of the buildings in the District as of the March 1 preceding such July 1. LEVY: The Treasurer shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1, and levy of each Parcel of Taxable Property as provided below. Step 1 :. Determine the Building Floor Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 2: Calculate the annual building special tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 80% of the Special Tax Liabiiity, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3: Multiply the total-Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of: (i) the annual building special tax rate calculated in Step 2 above; or (ii).the maximum building special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4: Determine the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 5: Calculate the annual land special tax rate as the lesser off (i) the Special Tax Liability, less the total amount calculated for all Parcels under step 3 above, divided by the total Land Area for all Parcels which are Taxable Property; or (ii) the maximum land special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 6: Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, by the annual land special tax rate determined under Step 5, above. Step 7: Calculate the sum of the annual building special tax (from Step 3) and the annual land special tax (from Step 6) for each Parcel which is Taxable Property. _ PREPAYMENTS Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A - particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Treasurer in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. Determination of the total amount needed by the Treasurer shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel. The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Treasurer, as follows: ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A2 _. 1. Compute the special tax for the then current Fiscal Year for such Parcel and the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. 2. The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all Parcels for the then current Fiscal Year, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special taxes for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). 3. The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount off (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Treasurer to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Treasurer to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFINITIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel, any fees of the County or the City related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and/or City staff directly related thereto, a proportionate amount of Authority and/or City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority, from its own- funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A3 Building Floor Area means the area, by square feet rounded up to the nearest whole integer, included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of a multiple story building, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Treasurer by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Treasurer shall determine applicable. City means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calenda~ year_which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. District means the Westside Improvement Authority Commumty Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area). Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time. Fiscal Year means the pe _hod starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of la~nd, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing-the issuance of Bonds. Treasurer is the Treasurer of the Authority, who is also the Finance Director of the City. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Treasurer, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District which is not otherwise exempt from the special tax pursuant to law, except that the following property shall · .\CFD I rogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A4 not be taxed: any acres of land (up to an aggregate of the first 20.0 acres first so designated by the Treasurer) which is a public right of way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement, or which is owned by a government entity or agency. Taxable Property includes Parcels owned by a public agency if the public agency has granted a leasehold or possessory interest therein to a non-exempt person or entity. · .\CFD I rogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A5 Exnmrr c WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMI.rN'ITY FACH~rrIE$ DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDA~.~'. AREA) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNER OF LAND WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTItO~ COMMUNITY FACII.ITIES DISTRICT NO. I Assessor's Parcel N~s. Name of Provertv Owner 940-310-013; 940-310-044; 940-310-045; 940-310-046; 940-310-047; 940-310-048; 940-320-001; 940-32~2; 940-320-003; and 940-320-004 John F. Firestone 10392 Ladera Senda Santa Aria, California 92705 ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE ~-- CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 27, 1998 Hold Public Hearing for Review and Approval of the 24th Year Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for FY 1998/99 PREPARED BY: Melinda Flores, Senior Management Analyst~(~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding proposals, approve the reduction of projects equally on a percentage basis in the event of future funding reductions and consider the two funding recommendations presented by the Finance Committee: Option A: Approve CDBG funding in the amount of $286,304 for projects identified in Attachment B, and or; Option B: 1. Approve CDBG funding in the amount of $286,304 and General Fund funding in the amount of $47,123 to meet Public Service funding requests in excess of available CDBG funds identified in Attachment B, and . Appropriate $47,123 from General Fund reserves to Community Services Funding Program Line Item. DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City annually through the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County. At tonight's Public Hearing, the City Council must hear and consider comments from the public regarding the CDBG funding recommendations. In order for a project to be considered for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals: . The activity benefits 51 percent low/moderate income persons; or, The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or, The activity meets an emergent community development need. A total of 17 applications were submitted to the City for consideration. All but one were determined to be eligible for CDBG funding. The City's allocation for FY98/99 is anticipated to be 8273,000. The addition of 813,304 in FY97/98 reprogrammed funds increases the anticipated allocation to 8286,304. CDBG regulations impose a 1,5 percent cap from the total allocation or a maximum expenditure of $42,945 for Public Services. A balance of $243,359 is available for public facilities, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and capital improvement projects (refer to table below). FY 98/99 CDBG ALLOCATION FUNDING CATEGORY 1998-99 CDBG Allocation FY97/98 Reprogrammed Funds (Additional funds available for projects) FUNDING ALLOCATION $273,000 13,304 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $286,304 Less Public Services (15% CAP) -42,945 Project Funding available for Facility Expansion & Capital Improvements & ADA $243,359 The FY97/98 reprogrammed funding is the result of a project funded in FY97/98 that was found to be ineligible due to changes in scope and sponsor. The project was resubmitted for funding by a different sponsor (Family Service Association of Western Riverside County) for both FY97/98 and 98/99 (refer to Attachment A). Four City projects were submitted under the categories of facility expansion, ADA park structure improvements and sidewalk installation. The 17 applications are summarized by project name, funding request and description in Attachment A. Due to the possibility that the City's allocation may be reduced, it is recommended that all projects be reduced equally according to the equivalent percentage in allocation reduction. All projects are subject to final approval at the Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for February 28, 1998. The EDA will submit a supplemental agreement to the City identifying the projects approved for funding in June 1998. After through review, the Finance Committee, composed of Karel Lindemans and Jeff Stone, are proposing two CDBG funding recommendations, Options A and B, described in Attachment B. FISCAL IMPACT: Option B requires an additional appropriation from the General Fund reserves of $ 47,123. The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City, other than staff time needed to administer program requirements. Attachments: A. FY98/99 CDBG Applications Funding Summary B. Finance Committee CDBG Funding Recommendations ATTACHMENT A City of Temecula FY98199 CDBG Applications Funding Summary . . APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY FUNDING OUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY REOUEST CRITERIA Va//ej~ I:ami/~, Support Family Service 5,000 Public Service/ Resubmitted application under new Services (Forma//y Assoc. of Western Low. Mod organization. Leasing a facility in Murrieta United School Riverside Co. FY97198 funds Murrieta to provide centralized District. Parent Center) services for lowlined income families, seniors, the disabled & migrant workers. Vallej~Familj~S#pport Family Service $10,000 Public Service/ Leasing a facility in Murrieta to provide Services Assoc. of Western Low. Mod centralized services for lowlined Riverside Co. income families, seniors, the disabled & migrant workers. TIP (Trauma/ntervention Trauma Intervention $6,000 Not Eligible Train volunteers to meet with victims Program) Programs or his/her relatives of a traumatic event and provide support. Thrift Store Expansion Habitat for Humanity $10,000 Public Service/ Propose to build affordable homes Inland Valley Low-Mod Income using land donated by the RDA. Also want to expand Thrift Store to increase sales earmarked for the construction of housing for Iowlmod persons. Emergencj~ Co/d Weather Riverside Co. Depart. $820 Public Service/ Provide emergency shelter using She/tot Program of Community Action Limited Clientele national guard armories or other shelters for homeless families. Mohi/itj~ Westview Westview Vocational $38,000 Public Service/ Purchase of a van meeting ADA Services Limited Clientele standards including wheelchair lift to transport disabled residents to receive vocational services. Direct Services/l~ape Rape Crisis Center $5,000 Public Service Provide a 24-hour crisis line & includes Prevention & Awareness hospital, court & law enforcement accompaniment and advocacy to victims of rape. /Ha/es to/Hen Program Growing Tree $500 Public Service A private juvenile group home which Foundation provides 24 hour care for boys on probation. Juveniles learn to improve social & academic skills. Operation School Be// Asst. League of $10,000 Public Service/ Provide clothing to children identified Temecula Valley Low-Mod Income by TVUSD in need of clothing. ATTACHMENT A City of Temecula FY98199 CDBG Applications Funding Summary APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY FUNDING OUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY REOUEST CRITERIA Emergency Fog# & Ai# Temecula Senior $10,000 Public Service/ Provide emergency food distribution Center Limited Clientele and limited utility assistance to low- income households based on referrals from Social Services and local churches. Alternatives to DomesticAlternatives to $15,000 Public Service/ Provide 24-hour crisis intervention, Violence Domestic Violence Limited Clientele advocacy services, emergency shelter, community education and the Children's Support Program. V. LP Tots V.I.P. Tots $3,768 Public Service/ Educational, recreational & early Limited Clientele intervention programs for disabled children including home visits. Boys & Girls Club of Boys & Girls Club of $32,400 Public Service/ Scholarship program for low income Temecu/a Temecula Low-Mod Income families to participate in AMIPM Camp activities & transportation. Parent Center Parent Center $5,000 Public Service/ Hold educational seminars, classes, & Low-Mod Income support groups to train low-rood income parents. Subtotal Public Services $151,488 TCSD. Senior Center Temecula $83,005 Public Facility Multi-year project to include design and Expansion Community Services expansion of the Senior Center and District purchase of kitchen equipment & furniture. TCSD. ADA Play Temecula $70,000 ADA Improvements to play structure and Structure improvements Community Services surface at the Sports Park to meet ADA District standards. RDA. Pujo/Street Redevelopment $80,000 Infrastructure Installation of sidewalks on Pujol Sidewalk improvements Agency Street. TCSD. ADA Park Temecula $10,354 ADA ADA Park Improvements at various improvement Project Community Services parks. Use reprogrammed funds from District FY97198. Subtotal Facility/infrastructure $243,359 TOTAL FUNDING REOUESTED $394,847 florem\cdbg\evalsum.98 ATTACHMENT B FINANCE COMMITTEE CDBG FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FY98199 FUNDING OPTION A OPTION B PUBLIC SERVICES REQUESTED CDB6 FUND GENERAL FUND GF & CDB6 A B C D E Family Service Asso. of West. Riv. F¥97/98 * 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 Family Service Asso. of West. Riverside 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 Trauma Intervention Programs 6,000 0 0 0 Habitat for Humanity 10,000 3,175 6,805 9,980 Dept. of Community Action 820 820 0 820 Westview Vocational Services 38,000 0 0 Rape Crisis Center 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 Growing Tree Foundation 500 0 500 500 Assistance League of Temecula Valley 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 Senior Citizens Service Center 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 Alternatives to Domestic Violence 15,000 6,000 9,000 15,000 V.IP Tots 3,768 2,000 1,768 3,768 Boys & Girls Club of Temecula 32,400 10,000 5,000 15,000 Parent Center 5,000 950 4,050 5,000 Subtotal- Public Service Projects ~ 151,488 f42,945 f47,123 $90,068 (15% CAP + $42,945) Total Columns C & D INON-PUBLIC SERVICES FUNDING I OPTIONA I OPTiONBI FACILITY EXPANSIONIADAIINFRASTRUCTURE REQUESTED CDBG FUND GENERAL FUND GF & CDBG A B C D E Temecula Senior Center Expansion 83,005 83,005 0 0 ADA Play Structure Improvements 70,000 70,000 0 0 Sidewalk Installation Project-Pujol Street 80,000 80,000 0 0 ADA Park Improy. Project FY97198 reprogrammed funds 10,354 10,354 0 0 Subtotal- Non-Public Services Projects $243,359 $243,359 $0 $0 (Amount available - $243,359) GRAND TOTAL- Public & Non-Public Services $394,847 $286,304 $47,123 ~333,427 (Total available CDB6 allocation - $286,304) Total Columns C & D * (Formallily submitted under Murrieta Unified School District- Parent Center- Change of Scope from building acquisition to lease of building in Murrieta). r:florem\quattro\cdbg\98/99evl.wb2 ITEM 12 A PPRO/~I~, ~----- CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA_~~I CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director DATE: January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No.4 to Specific Plan No. 199) - "Temeku Hills" Prepared By: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: o MAKE a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and findings that a subsequent EIR is not required; 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) 3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) R:\$TAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/20/98 cd 1 BACKGROUND During the processing of Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan No. 199, staff had asked that the applicant prepare a more readable document, using language from the City's Development Code wherever feasible. In their efforts to comply with this request, the applicant created the Residential Development Standards Matrix and accompanying text to serve as the reference document to expedite the plotting of new homes within the various Planning Areas of Specific Plan No. 199. The applicant unintentionally included lot coverage maximums within the matrix and text. Investigation of the original approval indicates that Specific Plan No. 199 was designed and partially constructed without a maximum lot coverage restriction. Staff concurs with the applicant that this language should be removed from the documents because the specific plan contains lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size required in the Development Code, and the lot coverage percentages used in the Code cannot realistically be applied to these smaller lots. FISCAL IMPACT The approval of the amendment is not expected to change the fiscal impact of Specific Plan No. 199 to the City. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 26, 1986. Another Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared on August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR. Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 1 §162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. FINDINGS ! Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. . Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cxl 2 . , , The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes a reduction in the density and intensity of land uses. Ultimate development will be residential development in an area that is comprised of a variety of residential neighborhoods. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the site and is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199. The amendment to Specific Plan No. 199 does not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report No. 202. Attachments: . City Council Resolution No. 98- (Planning Application No. PA97-0438, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) - Page 4 a. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Page 8 , City Council Ordinance No. 98- (Planning Application No. PA97-0438, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No, 199) - Page 10 ao Exhibit A - Amendment No. 4 Zone Standards text - Distributed under separate cover - Page 14 3. January 5, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 15 R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1115198 cd 3 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA97-0438 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) proposes to remove lot coverage requirements unintentionally included in the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0438 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97- 0438 on January 5, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA97-0438 and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199; WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27,1998 to consider Planning Application No. PA97-0438, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0438; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 The City Council hereby approves Amendment No 4 to Specific Plan No. 199, removing all references to maximum lot coverages. R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd [5 Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR, finds that due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd {~ I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of January, 1998 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15198 cd 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) Project Description: To correct the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text by removing the lot coverage standard within Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements , The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall and hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City. The City shall be deemed for the purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City, to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA97- 0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199). City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. , The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for Specific Plan No. 199 and its amendments unless superseded by these conditions of approval. . The text of Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 Zone Standards shall conform with Exhibit A, "Margarita Village Amendment //4 to Margarita Village SP Zone Standards," dated December 1997, or as amended by these conditions. I have read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval. Applicant's Signature R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1115/98 cd 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd ~0 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and WHEREAS, there is a need to amend Specific Plan No. 199 to accurately reflect private property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on January 5, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27, 1998 to consider the proposed amendment to Specific Plan No. 199 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 The City Council hereby amends Specific Plan No. 199 removing lot coverage from the matrix and text within the document entitled, "Margarita Village SP Zone Standards." R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 ~ 1 1 Section 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The City Council, based upon the information contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the info rmation contained in the previously certified EIR, finds that due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmemal Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of th is Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 ~ 12 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of January, 1998 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 ~ 13 EXHIBIT A PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 AMENDMENT NO. 4 ZONE STANDARDS TEXT DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 ~ 14 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 JANUARY 5, 1998 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:\STAFFRPT\438PA97.CC 1/15/98 cd 15 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 1998 Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) Prepared By: Carole Donahoe, AICP, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: I . MAKE a Determination of Consistency With a Project for Which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was Previously Certified and Findings Made that a Subsequent EIR is not Required; . ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No.4 to Specific Plan No. 199) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: To correct the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text by removing the lot coverage standard unintentionally included during the processing of Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan No. 199 LOCATION: South of La Serena Way, east of Margarita Road, west of Meadows Parkway, north of Rancho California Road, within the Margarita Village Specific Plan. BACKGROUND Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan No. 199 was approved by the Temecula City Council on October 7, 1997, eliminating the commercial acreage at the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, reducing the dwelling units to 3,922 units, adding a 12.5 acre public park, and revising roadway cross-sections, design guidelines and development standards, all within Village "A." During the processing of Amendment No. 3, staff had asked that the applicant prepare a more readable document, using language from the City's Development Code wherever feasible. In their efforts to comply with this request, the applicant created the Residential Development Standards Matrix and accompanying text to serve as the reference document to expedite the plotting of new homes within the various Planning Areas of Specific Plan No. 199. R:~I'AFFRP'I~35PA97.PC 12/30/F'/klb I ANALYSIS The applicant unintentionally included lot coverage maximums within the matrix and text. Investigation of the original approval indicates that the Specific Plan No. 199 was designed and partially constructed without a maximum lot coverage restriction. Staff concurs with the applicant that this language should be removed from the documents because the specific plan contains lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size required in the Development Code, and the lot coverage percentages cannot be realistically applied to these smaller lots. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 26, 1986. Another Initial Environmental Assessment was prepared on August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR. Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. FINDINGS . Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. . Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. . The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes a reduction in the density and intensity of land uses. Ultimate development will be residential development in an area that is comprised of a variety of residential neighborhoods. . The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the site and is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199. s The amendment to Specific Plan No. 199 does not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report No. 202. R:~TAFFR.FT~38PA97.PC 12/30/97 tn, 2 Attachments: o Planning Commission Resolution for Planning Application PA97-0438 - Blue Page 4 A. Exhibit A - Resolution No. 98- - Blue Page 7 B. Exhibit B - Ordinance No. 98- - Blue Page 11 C. Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 15 . Exhibits - Blue Page 16 A. Residential Development Standards Matrix and text R:~'TAFFRPT~3gPA~7.I~ 12/30/97 ~ 3 ATTACHMENT NO. I PC RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~'TAFFR-U'TM38PA97.PC 12/30/97 tn, 4 A~I~AC~ NO. 1 PC RESOLSON NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.CULA RECOMM~NDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RF.~OLUTION ENTITLED 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AIVW~NDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATF~D SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO C~RNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438- AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199),' AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0435 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199)' WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA97-0438 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) proposes to remove lot coverage requirements unintentionally included in the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0438 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; ~, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0438 on January 5, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA97-0438; R:~STAFFRFIM3gPA97.1~ 12/30/97 k~ ~ NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMML~SION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RF-~OLIYTION ENTI27.ED 'A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES G~LY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO CALWORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199),' AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTHT~ 'AN ORDINANCE OF TFIE CITY COIYNCIL OF TH'E CITY OF TEMECULA AMF~NDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,536 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF M~AIX)WS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199)' PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1998. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of January, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission: PLANNING COMMISSIONF_RS: NOES: PLA_NNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\$TAFFRPT~438PA97.~ 12/30/97 klb 6 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:~'TAFFRFI~38PA97.PC 12730~7 k~ 7 EXHIBIT A RF_3OLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.~ULA AMENDING SPECI~C PLAN NO. 199, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SF_,RF~NA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0438 - AIV~NDMENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) WHEREAS, the City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA97-0438 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) proposes to remove lot coverage requirements unintentionally included in the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0438 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; ~EAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0438 on January 5, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA97-0438 and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199; WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on __, 1998 to consider Planning Application No. PA97-0438, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WBlgRE~, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0438; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 The City Council hereby approves Amendment No 4 to Specific Plan No. 199, containing 1,526 acres generally located R:~"TAFFRPTM38PA97.1~ 12/30/97 klb 8 south of La Serena Way, east of Margarita Road, west of Meadows Parkway and north of Rancho California Road. Section 2. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and ex'anified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on August 20, 1997 which demm~ed that the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR, finds that due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the FIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmen~ analysis is required. Section 3. Severability.. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:~TAFFRFIM38PA97.PC 12/30/97 klb 9 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVEr~ AND ADOPTED this __th day of ,1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [S~AL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) $S CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,1998 by the following vote of the Council: CITY COUNCIL~ERS: NOES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~STAFFRFI~38PA97.PC 12/30/97 klb 10 EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. 98- EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SPECI~C PLAN NO. 199, REMOVING LOT COVERAGE FROM THE MATRIX AND TEXT OF SPF.~IFIC PLAN NO. 199 ZONING STANDARDS, CONTAINING 1,526 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA SERENA WAY, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97~38- AMENDMIgeNT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199) WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and WHEREAS, there is a need to amend Specific Plan No. 199 to accurately reflect private property and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on January 5, 1998, and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances; and, WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on 1998 to consider the proposed amendment to Specific Plan No. 199 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 The City Council hereby amends Specific Plan No. 199 removing lot coverage from the matrix and text. R:\$TAFFRPT~38PA97.PC 12/30/97 lifo Section 2. ENVIRONMF:~NTAL REVIEW. The City Council, based upon the information contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR, finds that due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STAFFRPT~438PA97.PC 12/30/97 klb '1 3 Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thisw day of , 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATrEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEALI STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) of the I IIEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,1998 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~TAFFR=P'l~3gPA97.PC 12/30/97 idb '~ 4 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~TAFFRP'I~38PA97.PC ]2/30/97 kib 1 5 EXHIBIT a CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199) Project Description: To correct the Residential Development Standards Matrix and text by removing the lot coverage standard within Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements , The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall and hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City. The City shall be deemed for the purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City, to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA97- 0438 (Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199). City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. . The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for Specific Plan No. 199 and its amendments unless superseded by these conditions of approval. , The text of Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 Zone Standards shall conform with Exhibit A, "Margarita Village Amendment #4 to Margarita Village SP Zone Standards," dated December 1997, or as amended by these conditions. I have read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval. Applicant's Signature R:\STAFFRPTX438PA97.COA 12/29/97 cd 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:~'T~38PA97.PC 12P~/97 kib 1 6 UNDER SEPARATE COVER ITEM 13 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE D I R E C T O~.,~__/"-'.~- CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official~~--- January 27, 1998 Administrative Citations Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: , Cindy Keirsey, Code Enforcement Officer That the City Council: Read by title only and introduce: ORDINANCE NO. 98- "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE." . Set the date and time and location of a Public Hearing on the proposed ordinance for, February 10, 1998, at 7:00 p.m., 43200 Business Park Dr. DISCUSSION: Currently for violations of the Temecula Municipal Code a criminal citation is issued which is a Notice to Appear in Court. The citation is either an infraction, punishable by up to a $100.00 fine or a misdemeanor which is punishable by up to $1,000.00 fine and/or 6 months in jail. All fines collected are held by the court. The Code Enforcement Division uses Citations conservatively, and only after repeated warnings are given. Administrative Citations are intended to be used as a means to expedite the abatement process and act as a deterrent in cases where voluntary abatement efforts are unsuccessful. BACKGROUND: Staff typically spends excessive hours in enforcement of these cases. Currently, a Notice to Appear in Court is issued and the case is referred to the district court for handling and collecting of forfeiture of associated fines. This program, unlike the current citation program, will provide the code enforcement officer the ability to more efficiently deal with cases where voluntary compliance has not been achieved, by levying a fine for such non compliance to be forfeited to the city instead of the district court. Further, this program allows for a hearing to be offered to the violator thus providing staff a further method of working with violators toward obtaining voluntary compliance. The graduated fine schedule has been developed as a deterrent for those violators that choose to ignore compliance orders. Due to the fact that staff can spend excessive time in the process of abating violations of the R:\BROCKMEI\AGENDA\ADMCIT.PRO 1122/98 cb municipal code, this program will also provide a means of revenue to the city to support these types of Code Enforcement abatement activities. Currently, fines incurred by the issuance of Citations are forfeited to the local district court. The visual impact of the proposed Notice of Violation, Exhibit B, which clearly indicates the potential fine, and its similarity to the Citation, Exhibit A, is anticipated to encourage voluntary compliance. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost will be incurred for the printing of Citation and Notice of Violation forms for this purpose, in the amount of $1,200.00. There are adequate funds in Account No. 001-162-999-5222, uPrinting", for this purpose. R:\BROCKMEI\AGENDA~ADMCIT.PRO 1/22/98 cb 3 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATWE PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 1.21 of Title I of the Temecula Municipal Code is added to read as follows: "CHAPTER 1.21. ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES -- CITATIONS. Sec. 1.21.010. Scope. This Chapter provides for administrative remedies for any violation of this Code, which remedies may be pursued in lieu of any other legal remedy, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the City to address any violation of this Code. The City Attorney, City Prosecutor, or their assistants, have sole discretion to determine whether a violation will be prosecuted criminally. If a violation is not criminally prosecuted, the City may proceed with administrative proceedings pursuant to this Chapter. Sec. 1.21.020. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in the context of this Chapter, shall have the following meanings: (a) Enforcement Official -- Any person authorized to enforce the provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code. (b) Legal Interest -- Any interest that is represented by a deed of trust, quitclaim deed, mortgage, judgment lien, tax or assessment lien, mechanic's lien or other similar instrument, which is recorded with the County Recorder. (c) Responsible Person -- Any person whom an Enforcement Official determines is responsible for causing or maintaining a violation of the Code. The term "responsible person" includes but is not limited to a property owner, tenant, person with a Legal Interest in real property, or person in possession of real property. See. 1.21.030. Administrative Citation. Any person violating any section of this Code that is subject to this Chapter may be issued an administrative citation by an Enforcement Official as provided in this Chapter. Sec. 1.21.040. Content of Administrative Citation. An administrative citation shall contain all of the following information: (a) The date and location of the violation and the approximate time the violation occurred. Co) The Code section violated and a description of how the section was violated. (c) The amount of the fine imposed for the violation, and the time within which and the place at which the fine shall be paid. (d) An order prohibiting another occurrence of the Code violation. (e) A description of the administrative citation review process, including the time within which to contest the administrative citation and the place from which to obtain a Request for Hearing Form to contest the administrative citation. (f) The name and signature of the citing Enforcement Official. Sec. 1.21.050. Procedure for Serving Administrative Citation. An Enforcement Official may issue an administrative citation, on a form approved by the City Manager, to a Responsible Person, as follows: (a) If the Responsible Person is a corporation, the Enforcement Official shall attempt to locate any one of the following individuals and issue to that individual an administrative citation: the president or other head of the corporation, a vice-president, a secretary or assistant secretary, a treasurer or assistant treasurer, a general manager, or a person authorized by the corporation to receive service of process in a civil action. If the office address of any of the above-listed individuals is known to the City, a copy of the administrative citation also shall be mailed to one of those individuals by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Simultaneously, the same notice may be sent by regular mail. If a notice sent by certified mail is returned unsigned, then service shall be deemed effective pursuant to regular mail, provided the notice that was sent by regular mail is not returned. (b) If the Responsible Person is a business other than a corporation, the Enforcement Official shall attempt to locate the business owner and issue the business owner an administrative citation. If the Enforcement Official can locate only the manager of the business, the administrative citation may be given to the manager of the business. If the address of the business is known, a copy of the administrative citation also shall be mailed to that address to the attention of the business owner or a Responsible Person. The mailing shall be sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Simultaneously, the same notice may be sent by regular mail. If a notice sent by certified mail is returned unsigned, then service shall be deemed effective pursuant to regular mail, provided the notice that was sent by regular mall is not returned. (c) The Enforcement Official shall attempt to obtain on the administrative citation the signature of the Responsible Person, or in cases in which the Responsible Person is a corporation or business, the signature of the person served with the administrative citation. If a Responsible Person or person served refuses or fails to sign the administrative citation, the failure or refusal to sign shall not affect the validity of the citation or of subsequent proceedings. (d) If the Enforcement Official is unable to locate a Responsible Person for the violation, the administrative citation shall be mailed to the Responsible Person by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Simultaneously, the same notice may be sent by regular mail. If a notice sent by certified mail is returned unsigned, then service shall be deemed effective pursuant to regular mail, provided the notice that was sent by regular mail is not returned. (e) If the Enforcement Official does not succeed in serving the Responsible Party personally, or by certified mail or regular mail, the Enforcement Official shall post the administrative citation on any real property within the City in which the City has knowledge that the Responsible Party has a Legal Interest, and such posting shall be deemed effective (f) If the Enforcement Official does not succeed in serving the Responsible Party personally, by certified mail or regular mail, and the City is not aware that the Responsible Party has a Legal Interest in any real property within the City, the Enforcement Official shall cause the administrative citation to be published once a week for four successive weeks in a local newspaper published at least once a week. Sec. 1.21.060. Administrative Fine. The fine imposed pursuant to this Article for a particular violation shall be in the amount set forth in the Administrative Citation Schedule established by resolution of the City Council. The Administrative Citation Schedule shall specify the amount of any late payment charges imposed for failure to timely pay the fine. Sec. 1.21.070. Payment of Administrative Fine. The administrative fine shall be paid to the City within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the administrative citation. If, after a hearing requested pursuant to Section 1.21.080, the Hearing Officer determines that the administrative citation should be canceled, the administrative fine shall be refunded in accordance with Section 1.21.150. Sec. 1.21.080. Request for Administrative Heating. Any Responsible Person to whom an administrative citation is issued may contest the citation no later than thirty (30) days from the date of service of the administrative citation by: (1) (~) completing a Request for Hearing Form and returning it to the City; and either depositing the administrative fine with the City or providing notice that a request for an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver has been filed pursuant to Section 1.21.090. A Request for Heating Form may be obtained from the department specified on the administrative citation. The person requesting the hearing shall be notified by certified mail, return receipt, of the time and place of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. Any documentation, other than the administrative citation, which the Enforcement Official has submitted or will submit to the Hearing Officer shall be served on the person requesting the hearing by certified mail, return receipt, at least five (5) days before the date of the hearing. Sec. 1.21.090. Advance Hardship Waiver Deposit. Any Responsible Person who requests a heating to contest an administrative citation and who is financially unable to deposit the administrative fine as required in Section 1.21.080 may file a request for an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver. The request shall be filed with the Department of Finance on an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver application form, available from the department, no later than thirty (30) days after service of the administrative citation. The Director of Finance may issue an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver only if the person requesting the waiver submits to the Director a sworn affidavit, together with any supporting documents, demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Director the person's financial inability to deposit with the City the full amount of the fine in advance of the hearing. The Director shall issue a written decision specifying the reasons for issuing or not issuing the waiver. The decision shall be served upon the person requesting the waiver by certified mail return receipt. If the Director determines that the waiver is not warranted, the person shall remit the full amount of the fine to the City within ten (10) days of receipt of the Director's written decision. Sec. 1.21.100. Time for Administrative Hearing. Only after a Request for Hearing Form is filed, and the Responsible Person requesting the heating has either deposited the administrative fine in full or obtained an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver, shall the City set the date and time for the administrative hearing. The heating shall be set for a date not less than fifteen (15) days nor more than (60) days after the Request for Heating Form is filed, and the administrative fine is deposited with the City or an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver is issued. The City shall send notice of the date, time, and place of the heating to the person requesting the hearing by certified mail return receipt at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. Sec. 1.21.110. Request for Continuance of Hearing. The Responsible Person requesting a hearing may request one continuance, but in no event may the heating begin later than ninety (90) days after the Request for Hearing Form is filed, and the administrative fine is deposited with the City or an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver is issued. Sec. 1.21.120. Appointment of Administrative Hearing Officer. The Director of the Department through which the administrative citation was issued, or his or her designee, shall select an Administrative Hearing Officer. The Administrative Hearing Officer may be, without limitation, a member of the staff of the department through which the administrative citation was issued. In no event, however, shall the Enforcement Official who issued the administrative citation be the Administrative Hearing Officer. Sec. 1.21.130. Procedures at Administrative Hearing. Administrative hearings are informal, and formal rules of evidence and discovery do not apply. Each party shall have the opportunity to present evidence in support of his or her case and to cross-examine witnesses. The City bears the burden of proof at an administrative hearing to establish a violation of the City Code. The administrative citation and any additional reports submitted by the Enforcement Official shall constitute prima facie evidence of the facts contained in those documents. The Administrative Hearing Officer must use preponderance of evidence as the standard of evidence in deciding the issues. Sec. 1.21.140. Failure to Attend Administrative Heating. If the Responsible Person fails to attend the scheduled heating, the heating will proceed without the Responsible Person, and he or she will be deemed to have waived his or her right to an administrative hearing. Notwithstanding this waiver and the time limits set forth in Section 1.21.100, if service of the administrative citation is made by posting the citation on real property within the City in which the Responsible Person has a Legal Interest, and the Responsible Person provides verifiable and substantial evidence that removal of the administrative citation from the property by a third party mused the Responsible Person's failure to attend the scheduled heating, the Responsible Person shall be entitled to an administrative hearing. Sec. 1.21.150. Decision of Administrative Hearing Officer. No later than thirty (30) days after the date on which the administrative hearing concludes, the Administrative Hearing Officer shall issue a written decision to uphold or cancel the administrative citation. The Administrative Hearing Officer shall set forth the reasons for the decision. The decision shall be served upon the Responsible Person by the applicable method set forth in Section 1.21.050. If the Administrative Hearing Officer upholds the administrative citation, the City shall retain the fine deposited by the Responsible Person. If the Administrative Hearing Officer upholds the administrative citation and the free has not been deposited pursuant to an Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver, the Administrative Hearing Officer shall specify in the decision a payment schedule for the fine. If the Administrative Hearing Officer cancels the administrative citation, any fine deposited with the City shall be promptly refunded, together with interest at the average rate earned on the City's portfolio for the period of time that the City held the fine. The Administrative Hearing Officer's written decision is final, and shall notify the Responsible Person of his fight to appeal as provided in Section 1.21.180. Sec. 1.21.160. Late Payment Charges. Any person who fails to pay to the City on or before the due date any administrative free imposed pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, shall be liable for the payment of any applicable late payment charges set forth in the Administrative Citation Schedule established by Resolution of the City Council. Sec. 1.21.170. Collection of Administrative Fine. The City may collect any past-due administrative fine or late payment charges by use of any available legal means. Sec. 1.21.180. Appeal of Decision of Administrative Heating Officer. Within 20 days after service of the decision of the Administrative Heating Officer upon the Responsible Person, he or she may seek review of the decision by filing a notice of appeal with the municipal court. The Responsible Person shall serve upon the City Clerk either in person or by first class mail a copy of the notice of appeal. If the Responsible Person fails to timely file a notice of appeal, the Administrative Hearing Officer's decision shall be deemed confirmed. Sec. 1.21.190. Failure to Pay Administrative Fine. Failure to pay an administrative fine is a misdemeanor. Filing a criminal misdemeanor action does not preclude the City from using any other legal remedy available to gain compliance with the Administrative Order." SECTION 2. Section 5.04.300 of Chapter 5.04 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "5.04.300. Violation--Penalties. A. Any person who fails to apply for and receive a certificate prior to the start of business, or has not applied for the renewal of an existing certificate prior to the expiration of the certificate shall pay the applicable fee, plus a penalty fee not to exceed twice the normal registration fee. B. If a person fails to file for a certificate as provided in this chapter within thirty calendar days after being informed to do so, or fails to pay the applicable fee, or violates any of the other provisions of this chapter, or knowingly or intentionally misrepresents any material fact to any offacer or employee of the city in procuring the certificate provided in this chapter, or continues to operate a business after the business registration certificate has been revoked, the person shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars or by confinement in jail not to exceed six months or by both such free and confinement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above acts constituting a misdemeanor may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 3. Section 5.08.150 of Chapter 5.08 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "5.08.150 Violation--Penalties. A. Any firm, corporation or person, whether as principal, agent, employee or otherwise, violating or causing the violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a free of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any provision of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter which is committed and continues from day to day constitutes a separate offense for each and every day during which such violation is committed or continued. B. In addition to the penalties set forth in subsection A of this section, any adult business which is operating in violation of this chapter or any provision thereof shall constitute a public nuisance and, as such, may be abated or enjoined from further operation." SECTION 4. Section 5.16.120 of Chapter 5.16 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "5.16.120 Violation--Penalty. Any solicitation conducted without obtaining a permit as required by this chapter shall constitute a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such violation may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 5. Section 5.20.110 of Chapter 5.20 of Title 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "5.20.110 Violation--Penalty. Any violation of any of the requirements of this chapter shall be an infraction and any violator may be punished pursuant to Section 1.20.010 et seq. of this Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any v'mlafion of any of the requirements of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 6. Section 6.02.170 of Chapter 6.02 of Title 6 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "6.02.170 Violation--Penalty. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by (1) (3) a fine not exceeding fifty dollars for the first violation; a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars for the second violation within one year; and a fine not exceeding two-hundred and fifty dollars for each additional violation within one year. Each day a violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any of the provisions of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 7. Subsection C. of Section 6.04.130 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the Temecula Municipal Code is added to read as follows: "C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of this section may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 8. Section 6.06.020 of Chapter 6.06 of Title 6 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "6.06.020 Duty to care for animals. Every owner, driver or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to be in any building, enclosure, land, street, square or lot of the city, without proper care and attention is guilty of a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such a violation may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code. The chief animal control officer shall take possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and treatment for the animal until the animal is deemed to be in suitable condition to be returned to the owner. When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal and others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with Section 6.06.070. In all other cases, the officer shall comply with the provisions of Section 6.06.080. The cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, if the seizure is upheld pursuant to this chapter." SECTION 9. Subsection C. of Section 6.08.160 of Chapter 6.08 of Title 6 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows: "C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any provision of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 10. Section 8.16.110 of Chapter 8.16 of Title 8 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "8.16.110 Enforcement--Violation--Penalties. It shall be unlawful, subject to punishment in accordance with Chapter 1.20, 1.21, or 1.22, and in accordance with Section 8.12.180, for any person -- natural or corporate -- owning, possessing, occupying or controlling any lands or premises subject to the provisions of this chapter to fail to perform the duty set forth in Section 8.16.020 of this chapter, or to fail to comply with the requirements in the notice to remove and abate as specified in Section 8.16.040 of this chapter or to interfere with the performance of the duties herein specified for any of the officers designated in this chapter or their deputies, or to refuse to allow any such officer or their deputies or employees, or approved private contractors, to enter upon any premises for the purpose of inspecting and/or removing any hazardous vegetation hereinbefore described, or to interfere in any manner whatever with said officers or contractors in the work of inspections and removal herein provided. Such penalties are in addition to any civil or equitable remedies available to the city to enforce the provisions of this chapter." SECTION 11. Section 8.20.630 of Article IX of Chapter 8.20 of Title 8 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "8.20.630 Misdemeanor. Violation of this article shall be a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any provision of this article may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 12. Section 8.20.720 of Article XIII of Chapter 8.20 of Title 8 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "8.20.720 Violation. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, violations of this chapter are punishable as set out in Chapter 1.20, 1.21, or 1.22, and in Sections 8.12.140 and 8.12.180." SECTION 13. Section 9.04.030 of Chapter 9.04 of Title 9 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "9.04.030 Violation--Penalty. Every day that this chapter is violated shall be a separate violation of this chapter. Every violation of this chapter shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any provision of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 14. Section 9.10.200 of Chapter 9.10 of Title 9 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "9.10.200 Prohibited conduct. Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and be punished in accordance with Sections 1.20.010 and 1.20.030A of this Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any violation of any provision of this chapter may be prosecuted as an administrative civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.21 or Chapter 1.22 of this Code. Revocation or suspension of a license issued under this chapter shall not be a defense against prosecution." SECTION 15. Subsection (d) of Section 17.03.100 of Chapter 17.03 of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "(d) Violations and Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision of this Development Code or any of the codes adopted by reference herein, any ordinance adopted pursuant to this Development Code, or to violate any permit (or the conditions thereof) granted pursuant to this Development Code. Violators shall be subject to punishment under Chapter 1.20, 1.21, or 1.22 of this Code." SECTION 16. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the county and circulated in the City within fifteen (15) days after its passage, in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code, shall certify to the adoption and publication of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. SECTION 17. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage. Adopted: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk, CMC Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney Ronald E. Bradley City Manager Approved as to content: Anthony J. Elmo Chief Building Official STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 98-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of January 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of Feburary 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA ~ (line) ~e4.a43e NOTICE OF VIOLATION ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION TMC ~.2~.oao CASE NO. DATE: ' TIME: DAY OF WEEI~: ......... AM NAME: "(Fii~, MXl(lle, Last) ..... ADORESS: CITY:. ............ STATE: ZIP: =0 'OTHER C~L INFO: Q BUSINE.~S OWNER ~) PROPERTY OWNER LOCAT'I(~N OF OCCURRENCE: CORRECT VIOLATION~ BY 111 ~ 3rd i~U.TY PINaLTf I~NALI'V MUNICIPAL COOE ViOLATiON l~O.OO $1~1).~ ~ 4 TNG&I?.~DM ATTRACTIVE NUI~NCE TO CHLDREN ,, ........ , 10 T~ ~16(19.9) S~ ~~ ..... ~2 ~ts~ ~ '~~m "- ....... ~3 ~ 17.~ I~ ~ ~E ~ ...... 14 , , ,,,, ~G~TURE: ...... , ........... REMARk: ~ ~MENT: ~Y ~F~M~ ' ' ~YEE ~. OFFI~AL~ ~G~TURE: i i ii ill J[ You MU,.~I' PAY ~ie violation fine wltlin 21 d~y~ of i~ ~t ~ C~ of T~ ~ Pa~ OK, ~O. ~x ~3, T~. CA ~9~, II ~ w~ to ~ a wr~ ~ for man~ ~ ~ manmr ~n~ ~ w~n ~ ~ d to ~y ~ ~ fine ~U ~ m ~ ~mi~ ~n ~h may i~l~ ~ fi~ am~ e~r ~ i~ ~ a m~m~r ~. NI ~ I~ ~. m~e I ~ v~ ~ c~ d any v~n e~i~ u~ ~ W~. ~ co~on ~ ag C~s e~~t ~ ~r to c~e of ~ ca~. To reque~ · heanng send a winten req,__-,~_. to: CRy ot Temecula, P.O. Box ti033, Temecula, CA 9'25~9-g033. Attn: Code Enfofcemer~ Div'mJon. WARNING: Failure to appear at a r_~a~_~_ale~l I'maring will reeun in forfeiture of all poet- e(I bed, doublin9 of fine eraounCe and 8CIdrd~rml citations. EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA Q F~*~ w^,,~NG (~Oe) 694.Mae NOTICE OF VIOLATION o FINAL WARNING CORRECTION NOTICE TMC 1.21.OSO CASE NO. '~)ATE: ~IME: ", DAY OF WEEK: .... AM ,. NAME:-iFirsi. Middle. Last) ADDRESS: CITY: " ' STATE: ZlP~ Q OT~'ER ~iDL. INFO: I~ BUSINESS OWNER Q PROPERTY OWNER --, LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: CORRECT VIOLATIONS BY. ii ii ii iiii i i i ii let 2nd 3rd WAIglNO IlINALTY PENALTY PF. NALTY MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATION ~D.(]0 $160.00 $260M 3 I'M~ &120~01( 11~4~14, DE~, k"r~ .,, 4 ~a~m0u ATm~C~W~C~TOC~U~E~ ,,, e ~7.~m0 ~~ e T~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ wAY I1 ~-~ ~~~~R~ .......... ,,. i 14 , , , ~, , ...... , , i ........ ~,.. SI~A~RE: ~: ........... ~ [N~~: ........ . ~Y EN~O~[~ EM~[ ~. ~FICI~'~ ~fONATURE: i i THIS NOTICE IS A WARNING: This notice has been issued tot the purpose of warn- ing the recipient that the cxmditi(xm existing on the affected property or actions taken by the recip- ient constitute a violation of the Temecula Municipal Code. ,This nofi(~ may be followed by an Administrative Citation with fines imposed equal to those marked above within the violation list should the violation(s) continue. All violaUone musl be corrected within the IhTle indicated on this warning notice. Compliance must be verified by the Code Enforcement Division. For more infor- mation concerning this notice oontact The City of Temecula Code Enforcement Division at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92589. (909) 694-6439. RF3OLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING TIIE ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION SCHEDULE FOR THE HJRI~SE OF SETTING FORTH ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AMOUNTS. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS: Chapter 1.21, Administrative Penalties-Citations, of the Temecula Municipal Code, provides for the issuance of an Administrative Citation to any person violating any section of the Temecula Municipal Code, and; WHEREAS' Section 1.21.60, provides for Administrative Citation fine amounts to be imposed as set forth in the Administration Citation Schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula determines and orders that administrative Citation fine amounts be established as set forth in the Administrative Citation Schedule attached to this Resolution as Exhibit 'A". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this loth day of February, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk, CMC R:~BROCKMEI~C1TATION. RES 1115/98 cb STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of February 1998, by the following roll call vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS' ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan W. Jones, Deputy City Clerk, CMC R:~BR~ATION.RE$ I/I:~D8 ~b EXHIBIT A ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION SCHEDULE A. First Violation ..............................................................................................$ 50.00 B. Second Violation of the same municipal code section ........................................................$150.00 C. Third and Subsequent Violations of the same municipal code section ........................................................$250.00 ITEM 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO' City Council FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager January 27, 1998 Selection of Date for Saturday Workshop for City Council Goal Setting RECOMMENDATION: Select a date for a Saturday, City Council Workshop. BACKGROUND: At our last City Council meeting, you asked me to suggest possible dates for a Saturday workshop for the purpose of Council goal setting. The Council needs to select a date from the following list: February 7, 1998, February 21, 1998, February 28, 1998, March 7, 1998 or March 14, 1998. Once you have selected a date, I will prepare an agenda and a work plan for that meeting. The meeting will be a publicly noticed public meeting, as are all Council Workshops. R:\agenda. rpt\council.wshp DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY ATTORNEY y/~W~/ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager/~ity C~uncil Gary Thornhil~,"~o'n~unity Development Director January 27, 1997 SUBJECT: Prepared by: Monthly Report ,, Valerie Wimberly, Administrative Secretary RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for the month of November/December 1997: Caseload Activity: The Department received applications for 47 administrative cases and 16 applications for public hearing cases for the month of November/December· The following are the public hearing cases: · Certificates of Compliance 3 · Conditional Use Permit 2 · Change of Zone 2 · Minor Conditional Use 1 · Tentative Residential Parcel Map 1 · Development Plan - Subject to CEQA 2 · Development Plan - with CEQA 4 · Specific Plan Land Use 1 Total 16 Attachments: · List of Activities with Detail - page 2 Revenue Status Report - page 3 R:~,IONTHLY.RPT~I~TkNOV-DEC. WPD 1/15/98 v~w 1 Ongoing Projects: Sion Ordinance: This item will be scheduled for City Council consideration in upcoming months. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: The charging station at the 6th Street parking lot and the maintenance facility has been installed. Regional Mall: Phase I grading operations have ended, Phase II to commence in February. Building construction is expected to commence in early 1998, with the opening scheduled for April 1999. Zev Buffman Entertainment Project: Phase II appeal went before the City Council on January 13, 1998. Murdv Ranch Specific Plan: Staff is awaiting contact from the new owner. No activity on this case. Rorioaugh Ranch Soecific Plan: The Specific Plan is currently being revised by the applicant. (1768 DU's and 11 Ac Commercial, and 150 Ac of natural open space). Southside Soecific Plan: Urban Design Studios has started the preliminary work for the preparation of the specific plan to prepare specific standards to begin the revitalize the Front Street corridor south of the Old Town area. The second community meeting will be held on January 22, 1998 with the property and business owners to present them with goals and policies and conceptual land use plans. Massage Business Ordinance: Staff held a second meeting with the massage professionals in December 1997. The ordinance will be presented to the City Council in February 1998. Adult Business Ordinance: The Council adopted an urgency ordinance in 1996. Staff is currently working on the permanent ordinance to regulate adult businesses while not curtailing a citizen right of free speech and expression. A committee of Ron Roberts and Ron Guerriero will examine the appropriate zones that adult business should be permitted before this ordinance is scheduled for the City Council hearing. General Plan Circulation Element Update (and revision to citywide traffic study): Consultant interviews will be held on January 29, 1998. Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is in the process of developing an appropriate subdivision ordinance for the City. The City currently uses Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 to regulate the subdivision of land. Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation Study: Staff is awaiting the results of the study which will recommend how the allocation of landscape service costs should be collected. With this information, staff will be able to complete the final studies so that it may make recommendation regarding annexation to the City Council. I~:~VIONTHLY.RP'I~If~NO¥-D£C.~/PD 1/1~/~8 ~ ~ ATTACHMENT NO. I LIST OF ACTIVITY BY CASE NUMBER R.:~MONTHLY. RPT~1997~IO¥-DEC.~v'PD 1/15/98 vSw ~ oo ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:~IONTHLY.RP'I~I997~TOV-DEC.WPD l/l$~g v~v 4 REVPRIN2 12/05/97 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4135 4136 4139 4140 4170 4171 4190 4195 4200 4206 ' 4369 4370 08:24:17 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADdUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADdUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE K-RAT STUDY FEES HOME OCCUPATIONS DEVLPMNT PLAN'ADMINISTRATIVE DIF REDUCTION APPLICATION IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT NOVEMBER 1997 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 5,900.00 24,700.00 .00 30,500.00 16,800.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 3,600.00 31,100.00 16,300.00 5,600.00 111,900.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 5,200.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,700.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 7,400.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 NOVEMBER REVENUE .00 325.00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 460.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7,554.00 .00 .00 7,485.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,110.00 .00 .00 .00 18.00 2,317.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 530.00 .00 187.00 2,651.34 1997-98 REVENUE .00 1,625.00 700.00 548.00 8,868.80 .00 16,209.40 2,070.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 12,395.00 .00 .00 34,956.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,885.00 1,131.00 .00 1,476.00 90.00 10,990.05 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,960.00 .00 187.00 18,247.38 PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL .00 1,625.00- *** 700.00- *** 5,352.00 9.3 15,831.20 35.9 .00 14,290.60 53.1 14,730.00 12.3 700.00 0.0 2,900.00 0.0 .00 13,500.00 0.0 .00 3,600.00 0.0 18,705.00 39.9 16,300.00 0.0 5,600.00 0.0 76,944.00 31.2 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 .00 3,885.00- *** 1,131.00- *** 5,200.00 0.0 1,476.00- *** 90.00- *** 10,990.05- *** .00 13,700.00 0.0 .00 1,500.00- *** .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 7,400.00 0.0 .00 3,960.00- *** .00 313.00 37.4 18,247.38- *** PLANNING 295,000.00 22,937.34 118,838.63 176,161.37 40.3 REVPRIN2 01/05/98 OOl 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4135 4136 4139 4140 4170 4171 4190 4195 4200 4206 4369 4370 15:58:58 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COHPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORHATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROHENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE K-RAT STUDY FEES HONE OCCUPATIONS DEVLPMNT PLAN-ADMINISTRATIVE DIF REDUCTION APPLICATION IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT DECEMBER 1997 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 5,900.00 24,700.00 .00 30,500.00 16,800.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 3,600.00 31,100.00 16,300.00 5,600.00 111,900.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 5,200.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,700.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 7,400.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 DECEMBER REVENUE .00 325.00 200.00 620.00 .00 .00 1,922.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 532.00 .00 .00 8,862.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 925.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,729.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,040.00 .00 .00 2,600.00 1997-98 REVENUE .00 1,950.00 900.00 1,168.00 8,868.80 .00 18,131.40 2,070.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 12,927.00 .00 .00 43,818.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,810.00 1,131.00 .00 1,476.00 90.00 12,719.10 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,000.00 .00 187.00 20,847.38 PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL .00 1,950.00- *** 900.00- *** 4,732.00 19.8 15,831.20 35.9 .00 12,368.60 59.4 14,730.00 12.3 700.00 0.0 2,900.00 0.0 .00 13,500.00 0.0 .00 854.00 76.3 18,173.00 41.6 16,300.00 0.0 5,600.00 0.0 68,082.00 39.2 .00 .00 200.00 0.0 .00 4,810.00- *** 1,131.00- *** 5,200.00 0.0 1,476.00- *** 90.00- *** 12,719.10- *** .00 13,700.00 0.0 .00 1,500.00- *** .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 0.0 7,400.00 0.0 .00 5,000.00- *** .00 313.00 37.4 20,847.38- *** PLANNING 295,000.00 21,501.05 140,339.68 154,660.32 47.6 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 27, 1998 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for December, 1997. r:\agdrpt\moactrpt/ajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report December 1997 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Scott Harvey Date: January 16, 1998 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-15/Winchester Road Intercham,e Modifications: -- All work has been completed except for plant establishment. Plant establishment work will continue for approximately one year. 2. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: The construction includes widening the south side of the bridge over the freeway, providing a new loop entrance ramp to northbound 1-15 Freeway from Rancho California Road, and relocafion of the existing norlhbound exit ramp. Construction began on Monday, January 5. The first phase of construction will consist of the following: restriping Rancho California Road and portions of the 1-15 freeway, clearing excess vegetation, and grading the site to accommodate the new bridge supports. Traffic controls will be in place, and traffic will be allowed through the work area during construction. The estimated time for the entire project, including landscape improvements is 16 months. 3. City Wide Inteln~ent Traffic Management System lITMS): All field work for this project has been completed. The consultant has received the computer system per the projeet's specifications and is currently installing the software. The complete system should be delivered by the end of January and it will be tested in Febnmry. The consultam will be monitoring the system and training the City staff for one year after the date of installation. 4. ADA Improvement Pro_iect: Construction for this project began on January 5. This improvement project will include sidewalk access ramps, new playground equipment, and rubberized surfacing around existing play equipment for access by wheel chairs at Veterans Park, John Magee Park, and Calle Aragon Park as well as ADA improvements to Rancho ~rmm fields at the Rancho California Spore Park. The contractor is presenfiy placing sidewalks at the Rancho California Sports Park. The project is scheduled for completion the second week of March. 5. Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Rd. and Yukon Rd./Hunter Dr. _ The construction contract for this project was approved by the City Council on October 28. The contractor has received the signal equipment and is currently installing the underground conduits and pole foundations. The contractor anticipates that the signal will be in operation by the end of January. R:~VlOACTRPT~CIP\98~IAN.MAR ~eh H. BID: 1. Marp_arita Community Park: Bids were opened for this project on January 15. Staff will recommend award of bid to City Council at the February 10 meeting. The project improvements will include restrooms, parking areas, pierde areas, play equipment, ~ennis courts, a roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ultimate width. Construction is anticipated to begin in March. 2. Winchester Creek Park: The project is currently out for public bidding, which will close on January 22. The project consists of a 4.5 acre neighborhood park wilh various improvements including restrooms, basketball courts, volleyball courts, play equipmere, polygon shelters with picnic tables, concrete walkways, and a parking lot. Staff will recommend award of bid to City Council at the February 10 meeting. Construction is anticipated to begin by late March. HI. WORK IN DESIGN: 1. I-IS/Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements: The roadway plans have been submlvaxl and signed by Caltrans (District 8). The structural plans have already been approved and signed by Caltrans, Division of Structures. SCE is also working on the design for the relocation of the existing 115, 33, & 12 KVA overhead power lines. These lines are scheduled to be relocated concurrently with the construction of the proposed Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements. The transmission and distribution sections of SCE have finalized their alignment and the City has completed the legal descriptions and plats for the SCE easements and temporary construction easements. 2. FY96-97 Pavement Mann~,ement System.' -- A design amendment has been approved and the consultant is now field surveying for the driveway and curb & gu r removals. The consultant anticipates submitting plans for second review in three weeks. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from lhe northerly city limits to Rancho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length of the project. 3. Pavement Man~ement System Up-Date-' The constaUmt has the public parking heretics report and is in the process of finalizing the P.M.S. Up-Date report for the entire city: This project will review and update the existing Pavement Management Syslem computer program which will include new streets which were added to the City's maintained system, preparing a new 5-year street maintenance program. 4. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening; The consultant is presenfiy addressing the City's plan check comments and expects to resubmit within two weeks. The Caltrans is reviewing Winchester Road Street Widening. Utility Companies are also reviewing the plans to identify potential conflicts with the proposed improvements. The scope of work includes the street widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, and the improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive. R:~IOACTRPT~CIP\98UAN.MAR 5. Overland Drive Street lmnrovements & Margarita Road Street Widenine: _ The consultant is presenfiy addressing the City's plan cheek comments and expects to resubmit within two weeks. The proposed improvemen~ will be on Overland Drive between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and on Margarita Road from Overland Drive to W'~r Road. Utility companies have been notified to address potential conflicts or new facilities which may be proposed. Also, storm drain plans have been submitted to R.C.F.C.D. for their review. The consultant expects the plan review to be completed by R.C.F.C.D. soon. 6. F!ashine Beaeorm at Variou~ Locations: -- On January 9, the consultant submitted second plan check to the City. Staff anticipates returning the plans to the consultant the week of January 19. The plans are also being reviewed by Temecula Valley School District. This project consists of installing flashing beacons that warn of children in the immediate area at 10 different school sites throughout the City. 7. Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Street Sidewalk Project #6: The project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Cosmic Drive between Rancho California Road and Agena Street and south side of Agena Street between Santa Cecilia Drive and Cosmic Drive. The design is complete and the project is scheduled to bid by late January. 8. Mar_parita Road Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba]: The improvements will include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will be located across from the high school and also improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive alternale improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields along with an expanded parking area. Revisions to lhe drawings are currently underway with final submittal of plans anticipated for the 3rd week in January. 9. 1-15/Winchester Southbound Off-ramu Widenine: The consultant has completed the surveying, geoteehnieal, and environmental work for this project. The project will provide an additional left turn lane from the southbound off-ramp onto Winchester Road. This project will also require a retaining wall between the southbound off-ramp and the southbound loop on-ramp due to the existing grades in the area of the ramp widening. The consultant is expected to submit the first plan cheek to Caltrans and the City the week of January 26. 10. Winchester Road Median Inlands: The consultant submittexl first plan cheek to the City on January 7 and staff returned the plan check to the cor, sultant on January 13. This project includes installation of median islands with landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Road between Enterprise Circle West and Jefferson Avenue along with the installation of a traffic signal at Enterprise Circle West. Also, the existing median island at Jefferson Avenue will be modified to provide for a longer left turn pocket for east bound traffic. R:~I OACTRPT~CIP\98~JAN.M AR eeh 11. Pala Road Brid~e: -- A Consultant is in the process of preparing the preliminary documentation required by Caltrans to receive HBRR Funds as well as performing utility re, search and design surveys. This project will include the realignment of Pala Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, which will require that a new bridge be co~, two new traffic signals to be installed, the removal of one traffic signal, the installation of sound walls, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and provisions for Wetland Mitigation. 12. Winchester Sidewalk; A consultant has been selected and the design is expected to start during the last week of January. This project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Winchester Creek Avenue. R:~d OACTRPT~CIP\98UAN.MAR LAND DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS DECEMBER 1997 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks Date: January 20, 1997 · PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bvnass Corridor; . . The Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S)interchange improvements including the design of Front Street realignment and its intersection with Western Bypass Corridor has been advertized for bid. The bid opening is scheduled for January. Phase II of the Rogersdale Entertainment Center (Buffman) which is the onsite development plan was approved by the Planning Commission. Staff began review of the first submittal of the Rough Grading Plans for the Entertainment Center. Review will resume upon submittal of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor plans and payment of review fees from the Applicant. 2. PW95-08 - First Street Extension: The negotiation between the City Attorney's Office and the affected property owners for acquisitions are ongoing. Plans and specifications finalization will resume once all necessary acquisitions .have been finaled. 3. PW95-26 - 6th Street Parkine Proiect: Awaiting the receipt of the Contractor's affidavit and maintenance bond. The project's completion will be noticed once said documents are received. The Edison Company's contractor completed the installation of two charging station devices in the parking area for electrical vehicles. 1 PW96-05 - Project Study Rer)ort (PSR! And Project Report (PR! For Ultimate Interchan_~e Imr)rovements at Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S)- The consultant selection for updating the Circulation Element of the General Plan is in progress. The PSR analysis will resume once the update on the Circulation Element of the General Plan is finaied. The review of the Margarita Canyon commercial subdivision Tentative Map submittals is in progress and the necessary reports addressing the environmental issues need to be submitted by the Applicant for review. R:~40A~.W!~D 5. General Plan Circulation Element Update: We are in the process of selecting a panel to interview the consultants who submitted proposals to conduct the update. 6. The Reoional Mall Project: The plans for the mall site perimeter infrastructure improvements are near completion. The design of the onsite precise grading and improvements plans are in progress according to schedule. crJ uii &ill MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent January 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - December, 1997 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of December, 1997: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 74 B. Total signs installed 0 C. Total signs repaired 0 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 25 III. POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned Vl VI. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. 10.570 20 1.98§ VII. STENCILING A. 96 B. 385 New and repainted legends L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping R:~!AINTAIN\M OACTRPT~9 7 ~D EC EM B ER.WPD Also, City Maintenance staff responded toSS service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to32 service order requests for the. month of November. 1997. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 162 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of December. 1997 was $118.341.79 compared to ~ for the month of November. 1997. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 82,830.79 30,543.00 4,968.00 CC: Ron Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) R:~IAINTAJ N~IOACTRPT\9 7~D EC EMB ER.WPD STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December, 1997 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ~ STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE ~ SIZE CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING . i i i i i i ii i , i , Date: 12/24/97 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs //5402 R&R 2,872 S.F. of Sidewalk 64 Yds. P.C.C. R&R 734 L.F. of Curb & 46 Yds. P.C.C. Gutter TOTAL P.C.C. 110 YDS. TOTAL COST $30,255.25 Date: 12/23/97 Rancho California Road @ Vincent A.C. Repairs to Intersections Moraga # 5402 TOTAL S.F. 1,200 TOTAL A.C. 10 TONS , TOTAL COST $3,908.00 CONTRACTOR: NELSON PAVING & GRADING Date: 12/08/97 Rainbow Canyon Road Grinding & Replace with 1.5" A.C. # 5402 TOTAL S.F. 9,076 TOTAL A.C. 80 TONS ,, ~ TOTAL COST $12,950.00 Date: 12/08/97 Rainbow Canyon Road @ Peehanga Creek Repairs to Bridge Abutmont Duo to Heavy Rains Bridge 'Emergency Work" TOTAL COST $1,583.74 TOTAL S.F.A.C. 10,276 TOTAL S.F.P.C.C. 3,606 TOTAL P.C.C. 110 YDS. TOTAL A.C. 90 TONS , TOTAL AMO .UNT ACCT. #.$402 $82,830:79 R:~NIAINTAIN~IOACTRPT~B7~D EC EMB ER.RPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December, 1997 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL A.C.C_O.UN_~ STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE ~ COST ,, . . .; ..11 . i i iii i:: ii i i [ i III ~ T. I ~l ; , i Illl CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATIN6 i i ii Date: 12/11/97 Walcott Lane Removal of Silt & Debris from V-Ditch's Due to Heavy Rains # 5402 "Emergency Work" , ,, TOTAL COST $2,316.00 , Date: 12/11/97 Walcott Street & Calle Girasol Repairs to Existing And Add New Over-The- Side Drains to R.O.W. Due to Heavy Rains # 5402 "Emergency Work" TOTAL COST $1,882.00 CONTRACTOR: PACIFIC STRIPING Date: December Citywide Restriping Restripe 500,179 L.F. of Traffic Striping 1997 TOTAL COST $29,935.80 CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING , ,, Date: 12/03/97 Santiago Road Area Grading and Repairs to All Dirt Roads Due to Liefer Road Area Heavy Rains "Emergency Work" , TOTAL COST $1,520.00 Date: 12/13/97 Santiago Road Area Grading and Repairs to All Dirt Roads Due to Liefer Road Area Heavy Rains "Emergency Work" . TOTAL COST $3,448.00 , , I i I I II I II iiiii I i ii i i i i i ji iii TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT I ~4.968.00 # 999-5402 4 R:~IAINTAIN~IOACTRP'r%97 ~D EC EM B ER.RPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December, 1997 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL ~ STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE ~ COST #5401 SIZE , ,, CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING . . Date: 12/13/97 Santiago Road Remove Silt & Debris From 3 Ponds and Desilting Ponds Repair or Rebuild Ponds Due to Heavy Rains , , # 5401 "Emergency Work" . . ,,,, TOTAL COST $11,179.00 Date: 12/11/97 Jedediah Smith Remove Silt & Debris From 2 Ponds and Desilting Ponds Repair or Rebuild Ponds Due To Heavy Rains # 5401 "Emergency Work" . ,, , ,, .... TOTAL COST $6,370.00 Date: 12/11/97 Via Lobo Channel Removal and Hauling Away of 2,400 Tons of Silt & Debris From Channel Due to Heavy # 5401 "Emergency Work" Rains , TOTAL COST $12,994.00 , , CONTRACTOR: Date: # . , TOTAL COST Date: , ~ , TOTAL COST i, , i, , , I II I I I i i i ~ i ii iii ii ,, , iii ii I TOTALAMOUNTACC' I $30,543.00 #5401 ,,, , ',,, ,,, ,, , , , , , , ~ , , , , , R:~AINTAIN~ OACTRPT~97~D EC EM8 ER.RPT 0'7, Z~ Z Ix) o · 0 o o o ~-o0 °°8 O0 O0 o oo o °8 o o 8~ 8~ o o z z CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF DECEMBER , 1997 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 12/01/97 HERITAGE PARK DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/01/97 12/01/97 41150 VIA HALCON TREE REMOVAL 12/01/97 12/01/97 39445 PALA VISTA STREET GRADING 12/01/97 12/01/97 29763 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL CATCH BASIN CLEANING 12/01/97 I 12/01/97 30163 DEL REY ROAD A.C. BEAM REPAIR 12/01/97 12/02/97 27515 BOLANDRA SLURRY SEAL CONCERN 12/02/97 12/02/97 31174 CAMINO DEL ESTE TREE TRIMMING 12/02/97 , , 12/02/97 40685 CALLE KATERINE DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/02/97 , 12/02/97 MARGARITA ROAD ~ HWY 70N TRENCH REPAIR 12/02/97 ,,, 12/02/97 40223 MIMULUS CONSTRUCTION NOISE 12/02/97 12/04/97 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD STREET REPAIR 12/04/97 12/04/97 39790 GOLDEN ROD ROAD W-53 MISSING 12/04/97 12/04/97 31249 COMOTILLO COURT DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/04/97 12/04/97 31390 CORTE RIMOLA SIDEWALK REPAIR 12/04/97 12/05/97 45895 LA CRUZ TREE TRIMMING 12/05/97 12/05/97 SILVER RIDGE COURT SLURRY SEAL CONCERN 12/05/97 12/08/97 28426 PUJOL STREET STORM DRAIN CLEANING 12/08/97 12/08/97 31695 CALLE GIRASOL EROSION CONTROL 12/08/97 12/08/97 45521 CLASSIC WAY TREE TRIMMING 12/08/97 , 12/08/97 43973 EL LUCERO DEBRIS REMOVAL 12/08/97 12/08/97 31605 CALLE GIRASOL EROSION CONTROL 12/08/97 , 12/08/97 40242 HOLDEN CIRCLE CHANNEL CLEANING 12/08/97 12/08/97 41770 MARGARITA STORM DRAIN CLEANING 12/08/97 , , 12/09/97 JOSEPH ROAD ~ WILLOW CREEK R- 1 MISSING 12/09/97 , 12/10/97 30050 CIELO MESA STORM DRAIN CLEANING 12/10/97 12/10/97 29820 CORTE FALDAS TREE DOWN 12/10/97 12/11/97 SOLANA ~ MARGARITA TREE DOWN 12/11/97 I Rf~MAINTAII~WICC MPLTD~qOR. Sk97~ECEMBER. RPT [ DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK' RECEIVED COMPLETED 12/11/97 41080 AVENIDA VERDE TREE DOWN 12/11/97 , , 12/11/97 40925 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE TREE DOWN 12/11/97 , , 12/11/97 VIA LA VIDA ~ MARGARITA POTHOLE 12/11/97 12/11/97 45975 PARSIPPANY COURT TRAFFIC FLOW 12/11/97 12/1297 31125 RUIDOSA OUARD RAIL DOWN 12/12/97 , 12/12/97 RANCHO CALIF. RD. ~ BUTTERFIELD STREET FAILURE 12/12/97 STAOE 12/12/97 30890 BARDMOOR DRIVE TREE DOWN 12/12/97 12/12/97 41676 AVENIDA DE LA REINA TREE TRIMMING 12/12/97 12/15/97 41050 AVENIDA VERDE TREE TRIMMING- 12/15/97 12/15/97 41883 BOREALIS DRIVE ROOT PRUNE 12/15/97 12/15/97 45492 TOURNAMENT DEBRIS REMOVAL 12/15/97 12/15/97 41945 FIFTH STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL 12/15/97 12/15/97 30981 CORTE ARROYO TREE TRIMMING 12/15/97 12/16/97 30345 COL1NA VERDE DEBRIS RMOVAL 12/16/97 12/16/97 42064 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA ROOT PRUNE 12/16/97 12/16/97 39720 BARBERRY STREET FAILURE 12/16/97 12/17/97 30995 VIA NORTE DITCH CLEANING 12/17/97 12/18/97 42064 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA ROOT PRUNING. 12/18/97 12/19/97 39600 GATL1N ROAD SNS REQUESTED 12/19/97 12/19/97 WINCHESTER ~ MARGARITA POTHOLE 12/19/97 12/22/97 MAIN STREET ~,, MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION 12/22/97 12/22/97 41884 4TH STREET DEBRIS CLEAN-UP 12/22/97 12/22/97 29785 VIA LAS CHACRAS OIL SPILL 12/22/97 12/23/97 100 CALLE CORTEZ TREE DOWN 12/23/97 12/24/97 30006 CORTE CANTERA TREE TRIMMING 12/24/97 12/24/97 31300 CALA CARRASCO ILLEGAL DUMPING 12/24/97 12/24/97 40345 CALLE TORCIDA R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT 12/24/97 12/29/97 MOTOR CAR PARKWAY POTHOLE 12/29/97 12/31/97 LA SERENA DEBRIS PICK-UP 12/31/97 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS S6 I I i I II I II mill I I II Jll II IIi I R:~MAIN~AIN~CMPLTD~.ROR~.9~D£C£MB£R. RPI' CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1997 DATE ! LOCATION ! WORK COMPLETED ,J 12/01/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~ ASTEROID REPLACED R-7 "T.C." 12/01/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD POST OFFICE REPLACED DELINEATOR "T.C." 12/02/97 1 ST STREET ~ CUL-DE-SAC REPLACED 3 TYPE N MARKERS "DAMAGED" 12/08/97 JEDEDIAH SMITH EAST OF DE PORTOLA REPLACED R-2 "40" "MISSING" 12/08/97 RANCHO CALIF. RD. F/E/Bfr ~ MARGARITA REPLACED W-41 "T.C." 12/09/97 MARGARITA EAST OF PAUBA REPLACED W-17 "MISSING" 12/10/97 WILLOW CREEK ~ JOSEPH ROAD REPLACED R-1 "MISSING" 12/16/97 FRONT STREET ~ VIA MONTEZUMA REPLACED W-41 "FADED" 12/16/97 WALCOTT ~ CALLE CHAPOS REPLACED W-57, TYPE N. "DAMAGED" 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. ~ VIA LAS COLINAS REPLACED R-1 T.C. 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~MARGARITA REPLACED 3 R260 R-26 R-18-2-1 FADED 1 2/17/97 MARGARITA WEST OF MORAGA REPLACED W-41 FADED 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD W/O HUMBER REPLACED R2-50 DAMAGED 12/17/97 MARGARITA ~ LA SERENA REPLACED TYPE N DAMAGED 12/17/97 MARGARITA ~ YUKON REPLACED TYPE K MISSING 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. ~ VIA LAS COLINAS REPLACED TYPE K MISSING 12/19/97 LA SERENA ~ WALCOTT REPLACED W-17, TYPE "N" DAMAGED 12/23/97 3RD STREET ~ FRONT REPLACED R-1 "T.C." 12/24/97 YNEZ SOUTHBOUND FOR RANCHO VISTA REPLACED W-41 FADED 12/24/97 YNEZ SOUTHBOUND FOR PAUBA RPLACED W-41 FADED 12/24/97 PAUBA BETWEEN MARGARITA & GREEN TREE REPLACED 10 R-26 FADED 12/29/97 PAUBA ~ VIA CERDA REPLACED W-5-RT DAMAGED 12/29/97 PAUBA BETWEEN VIA RAMI & VIA CERDA REPLACED 4 R-26 FADED 12/29/97 40474 CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED W-17 FADED 12/29/97 LA SERENA NORTH OF CALLE PrI~A COLADA REPLACED TYPE N & 1 CARSONITE DAMAGED 12/29/97 LA SERENA ~ SOUTH GENERAL KEARNY REPLACED W-17 FADED 12/29/97 CALLE PII~A COLADA ~ LA SERENA REPLACED R-1 DAMAGED 12/29/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN YUKON REPLACED 3 R-7 DAMAGED & MARGARITA R:hMAINTAIN'~WKCMPLTD~SIGNSk~7~BLANK. FRM 12/29/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~ HOPE WAY ~PLACED 3 R-7 D~GED 12/29D7 ~CHO C~O~ RO~ ~ CL~ ~ER ~PLACED 5 DEL~ATORS D~GED 12/30/97 ~ LA ~A ~ ~O~TA ~PLACED R-1 D~GED 12~0/97 ~CHO C~WO~ RO~ ~ST OF ~PLACED T~E "K" D~OED ~O~TA , 12/30/97 ~CHO C~WO~ RO~ BET~EN L~ ~PLACED 2 T~E "K" D~GED L~ & ~Z 12B0/97 ~Z BET~EN ~CHO C~O~ RO~ & ~P~CED 2 R-265 F~ED TO~ CE~R 12B0/97 ~Z ~ LA SENNA ~PLACED T~E "K" ~SS~G , , , , 12/30/97 ~Z BET~EN ~C~S~R & P~ PL~ ~PLACED 4 T~E "K" ~SS~O 12/30/97 ~Z BET~EN TO~ CE~ & LA SENNA ~PLACED 6 R-265 F~ED , ,, , , ,, , TOT~ SIGNS ~P~CE~ 74 TOTAL SIGNS ~ST~D 0 TOTAL SIGNS ~PA~D 0 R:hMAINTAIN~WKCMPLTI)~SIGNb~97~BLANK. FRM CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1997 12/03/97 CALLE CORTEZ ~ DEL RIO TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES 12/03/97 DEL RIO ~ LAS HACIENDAS TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 12/18/97 PAUBA WEST OFLAPRIMAVERA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 12/23/97 YNEZ BETWEEN PAUBA & RANCHO VISTA TRIMMED 9 R.O.W. TREES 12/30/97 YNEZ BETWEEN PAUBA & RANCHO VISTA TRIMMED 7 R.O.W. TREES 12/31/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~ VIA LAS TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES COLINAS , ,, ,,, , , , TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED I~klNTAII~WKCMPLTD\TREE~97~DECEMBEI~RPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1997 i i i ,DATE ! LOCATION I ! WORK COMPLETED ! · 12/03/97 CALLE CORTEZ ~ DEL RIO ABATED 800 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS , 12/12/97 FRONT STREET ~ SANTIAGO ABATED 1,050 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS 12/29/97 VIA NORTE ~ KAHWEA ROAD ABATED 1,620 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS , 12/29/97 FRONT STREET ~ SANTIAGO CHANNEL ABATED 1,000 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS , , 12/30/97 PREECE ~ YNEZ ABATED 3,150 S.F. OF RoO.W. WEEDS , 12/31/97 N. GENERAL KEARNY ~ LA COLINA ABATED 1,250 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS 12/31/97 N. GENERAL KEARNY ~ CALLE PII'TIA COLADA ABATED 1,500 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS , , 12/31/97 VIA NORTE ~ CALLE PII~A COLADA ABATED 200 S.F. OF R.O.W. WEEDS , , , , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , TOTAL $.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 10.$70 R:~AINTAIN~WKCMPLTD\WEEDS~O~DECEMBER. RFr CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1997 DATE ] LOCATION [ WORK COMPLETED 12/01/97 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 51 CATCH BASINS 12/02/97 MOONTIDE ~ SOUTHERN CROSS CLEANED & CHECKED 3 CATCH BASINS 12/02/97 JEFFERSON ~ HUNGRY HUNTER CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 12/06/97 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 70 CATCH BASINS 12/07/97 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 55 CATCH BASINS 12/08/97 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 12/15/97 AREA #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 14 CATCH BASINS 12/16/97 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 16 CATCH BASINS 12/18/97 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 22 CATCH BASINS 12/24/97 AREAS #1 & #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 17 CATCH BASINS 12/30/97 CITYWIDE "UNDER SIDEWALK DRAINS" CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 285 R:UV!AINTAIN~WKCMPLLrrD~CATCHBAS~97~BLANK. FRM CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF DECEMBER, 1997 12/12/97 MORENO DRIVE REPAINTED 285 L.F. OF RED CURB 12/15/97 AREAS #2 & #4 REPAINTED 34 LEGENDS 12/16/97 AREA #2 REPAINTED 32 LEGENDS 12/17/97 AREA #2 REPAINTED 27 LEGENDS 12/18/97 MEADOWS ~ RANCHO VISTA INSTALLED 3 LEGENDS 100 L.F. OF 8" WHITE LINE TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS L.F. OR NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING ,, 385 ..... R:KMAINTAIl~WKCMPLTD~h~rRIPING"k97~DE C EMBER. RPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF DECEbiBER, 1997 12/01/97 WINCI~STER CREEK ~ HWY 79N REMOVED 90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/01/97 VIA LA VIDA ~ VIA RENATE REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/02/97 RANCHO VISTA ~ MIRA LOMA REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/04/97 CAR WASH ON MERCEDES REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/08/97 MARGARITA ~ SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/09/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~ DIAZ REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/09/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ~ BRIDGE REMOVED 54 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/09/97 FELIX VALDEZ ~ VINCENT MOAGA REMOVED 263 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/15/97 RANCHO CALIAFORNIA ROAD # 1-15 BRIDGE REMOVED 871 S.F. OF GRAFFITI i 12/15/97 PUJOL STREET ~ 6TH STREET REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI: I I i I I Illl I 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (~ YNEZ REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/17/97 TARGET STORE REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/17/97 RANCHO CALIFORNIA APARTMENTS REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/17/97 YNEZ I~ WINCHESTER REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFrrI 12/17/97 29752 VIA LA VIDA REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/18/97 VIA CERDA (~ PAUA REMOVED 11 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/18/97 MEADOWS PARKWAY ~ McCABE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/23/97 RANCHO CALIF. RD. (~ VIALAS COLINAS REMOVED 334 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/30/97 FELIX VALDEZ ~ RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/30/97 VIA LA VIDA (~ VIA RENATA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI II Ill I II Ill I II TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 1.986 TOTAL LOCATIONS 20 " · " , ,~ , : , , ,,, '-,, , ,,, T ,, ',,, ~' MI' R:hMAINTAIN~WKC MPLTI~GRAFFfrB9'ADECEMBER. WPD 0 4O 0 0 0 0 i illlU i r ' 11 II~ i i, '