The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About011398 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) §94-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 13, 1998- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation, three matters: a) City of Temecula v. Mason/Mashburn et al; 2) Pratt v. City of Temecula et al.; c) City of Temecula v. Gabriel et al. 2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: 42380 Zevo Drive Negotiating Parties: Temeka Advertising and City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Terms and conditions of a Development Agreement affecting real property interests with Temeka Advertising. 3. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: 28699 Front Street; Negotiating Parties' City of Temecula, John H. Poole, Peter A. Poole and Richard L. Aquire, as Trustees of the John Ho Poole Trust No. 1; Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions of a Lease Agreement Affecting Real Interests with the John H. Poole Trust No. 1. 4. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator: Property: approximately 120 acres located westerly of Pujoi Street; Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula, John Firestone and Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1; Under negotiation: Price and Terms of payment of potential acquisition. 5. §54957, City Manager Annual Evaluation. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting, All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. R:\Agenda\011398 I CALL TO ORDER: Prelude Music: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Katie Rubke Reverend Lyle Peterson, Hope Lutheran Church Councilmember Comerchero Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone Next in Order: Ordinance: NO. 98-01 Resolution: NO. 98-01 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calender are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Ado_Dtion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:\Agenda\011398 2 2 Approval of Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of December 9, 1997. 2.2 Approve the minutes of December 16, 1997. 3 Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled' RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1997. Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30. 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 1997. Indian Gaming Industry in California RECOMMENDATION. 6.1 Approve sending letters of support for Indian Gaming in California to local, State and Federal authorities. 7 Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Award a contract for P.C. workstations to Western Data Technology of Riverside, California in the amount of ~ 1,640.00 per unit, plus sales tax, for a total purchase amount of 921,241.50. R:\Agenda\011398 3 8 Record~ Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION' 8.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Release Traffic $ignalization Mitigation Security in Tract No. 24133-2 (Located easterly of the intersection of Santiago Road at Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation Security in Tract No. 24133- 2; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 10 Reduce Faithful Performance Security Amovnt in Parcel Map No. 24085-1 (Located at the northwesterly corner of the Intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive, Avenida de Ventas) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Authorize fifty percent (50%) reduction in Faithful Performance Security amount for street improvements in Parcel Map 24085-1; 11 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Emergency Expenditure RECOMMENDATION' 11.1 Ratify the emergency expenditure of $30,543 to Monteleone Excavating for the following unforseen Public Works repairs that emerged as a result of heavy rains on December 6, 1997 and December 7, 1997' Removal of silt and debris from the Santiago Desilting Ponds. Reconstruction of the Santiago Desilting Ponds. Cleaning of the Jedediah Smith Channel. Cleaning of the Via Lobo Channel. 12 Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities - West Side of Margarita Road - Solana Way to North General Kearny Road, Project NO. PW97-07 RECOMMENDATION' 12.1 Authorize expenditure of an estimated $150,000 to underground the overhead facilities on the west side of Margarita Road from Solana Way to North General Kearny Road, Project No. PW97-07. R:\Agenda\011398 4 13 14 Amendment NO. 1 to Appraisal Contract Related to Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) 1997 Series Bonds RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to an Agreement with Bruce W. Hull & Associates, Inc. for an appraisal of certain properties within CFD 88-12 for an amount of 94,000. Community Facilities District NO. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclose Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY AND THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY R:\Agenda\011398 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone Next in Order: Ordinance' No. CSD 98-01 Resolution: No. CSD 98-01 ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 1 5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION' 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 9, 1997. 1.2 Approve the minutes of December 16, 1997. Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 1997. R:\Agenda\011398 6 Release of LandscaDe Bond - Tract 231 25-3 ¢D~Portol~ Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the release of Parkland\Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for Tract No. 231 25-3 - Kaufman & Broad of San Diego, Inc. 3.2 Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the Community Services District before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the District Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. 4 Proposed Residential Street Lighting Fee- Tra(;t NO. 2,5892 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 1998 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TRACT NO. 25892 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 4.2 Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the completion, return and tabulation of the ballots. 4.3 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the aforementioned process. R:\Agenda\011398 7 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: January 27, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, R:\Agenda\011 398 8 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: NO. RDA 98-01 Resolution: No. RDA 98-01 ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item ,not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 9, 1997. 1.2 Approve the minutes of December 1§, 1997. Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: 2,1 Receive and file the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 1997. R:\Agenda\011398 9 Amend Sco.De of Work with Webb and Associates tO Prepare Construction Drawings for the Old Town Streetsca_De Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION' 3.1 Approve an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement to expand the scope of work and authorize additional fees in the amount of $§2,230 to Webb and Associates to prepare Construction Drawings for the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project in accordance with the proposal and authorize the Chairperson to execute the Amendment on behalf of the Agency. Consultant Selection for 01d Town Marketing Analysis/Economic Consulting RECOMMENDATION' 4.1 Approve a contract with Keyser Marston Associates to provide economic consulting services for Old Town Temecula and Westside area. 4.2 Authorize Executive Director and City Attorney to execute the contract with Keyser Marston. 4.3 Appropriate $40,000 from RDA Fund Balance to the RDA Consulting line item. REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting' January 27, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011398 10 WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: NO. WIA 98-01 Resolutign: NO. WIA 98-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Steve Ford presiding ROLL CALL: AUTHORITY MEMBERS' Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts ABSTAIN' Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 1.5 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Westside Improvement Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. AUTHORITY BUSINESS 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.2 Approve the minutes of December 16, 1997. R:\Agenda\011398 11 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Ron Roberts Financing for Westside Area Public Improvements and Openspace Aco. uisition and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY 2.2 2.3 2.4 That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION R:\Agenda\011398 12 2.5 That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN 2.6 That the Board of Directors read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts AUTHORITY BUSINESS Westside Improvement Authoritv's Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) - Expansion of List of Facilities Eligible to be Financed RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF CONSIDERATION TO ALTER THE FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED BY THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AUTHORITY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the next regular meeting: January 27, 1998, scheduled to follow the Redevelopment Agency meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011398 13 INDUSTRIAl. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ron Roberts presiding Next in Order: Resolution No. IDA 98-01 Ordinance No. IDA 98-01 ROLL CALL: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Westside Improvement Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Authority on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. AUTHORITY BUSINESS 1 Resolution of Industrial Development Authority Declaring the Intention tO Issue Bonds RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. IDA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. FACILITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AUTHORITY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT R:\Agenda\011398 14 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 15 Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment No. 6 of the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Make a determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. 15.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219), THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-020- 004, 950-020-009 THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020-029, 955- 030-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 16 Planning Application No. PA 97-0348 Amendment to the City's Development Code Pertaining to Permitted Uses for Granny Flats and Guest Houses, Parking and Driveway Standards for Multi-Family Units, Second Units, Granny Flats and Guest Houses in Residential Areas and Adding a Definition of Guest House RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA 97-0348. R:\Agenda\011398 15 17 16,2 Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI- FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE Planning Ap_olication No. PA 97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) Ap0eal bv Albert S. Pratt (Property located west of Old Town Temecula, 100 feet west of Pujol Street, 700 feet south of Ridge Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive and east of the City's western border.) RECOMMENDATION' 17.1 Make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and an Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and findings that a subsequent or supplemental EIR are not required; 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled' RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), TO PERMIT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TOTAL OF 203,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ARCADES, THEATERS AND SHOPS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING) ON 16.5 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (100 FEET WEST OF PUJOL STREET), 700 FEET SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE/VINCENT MORAGA DRIVE AND EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, WITHIN THE WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-013, 940- 310-044, 940-310-045, 940-310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001,940-320-002, AND 940-320-003 BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE R:\Agenda\011398 16 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: January 27, 1998, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011398 17 ITEM 2 INDEX CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 1997 SUBJECT PAGE CALL TO ORDER EXECUTIVE SESSION ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL REPORTS 2-3 CONSENT CALENDAR 3-8 PUBLIC HEARINGS Self-storage facility Use ambient air balloons and other similar inflatables 9-14 14 COUNCIL BUSINESS 14- 16 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 18 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 18 ADJOURNMENT 19 Minutes/120997 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 1997 EXECUTIVE SESSION A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, to discuss closed session items as noted below: 1) §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: Approximately 6.22 acres located on the north side of Rancho California Road between Business Park Drive and Diaz road (APN 921-020-075); Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula and KI KFLA Rancho Realty: Under negotiation: price and terms of payment. 2) §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: 27622 & 27628 Jefferson Avenue; Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula, Connie Hill and Dean Hill: Under negotiation: price and terms of payment. 3) §54956.9(a), Pending Litigation, Connie Hill v. City Qf Temecula. 4) §54956.9(b), Potential Litigation, two matters. 5) §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property: Approximately 120 acres and is located westerly of Pujol Street; Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula, John Firestone and Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1; Under negotiation: price and terms of payment of potential acquisition. The Temecula City Council reconvened at 7:09 P.M. in City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, to consider regularly scheduled City Council business. Mayor Roberts presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and Roberts. ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None. Also present were City Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Greek. Minutes/120997 1 Cit_v Council Minutes December 9. 1997 PRELUDE MUSIC In lieu of prelude and intermission music, a videotape was shown, promoting the Christmas theme for Old Town "Dickens of a Christmas." INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Leon Franklin, Mountain View Community Church. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilman Lindemans. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mrs. Beverly Stone, 43136 John Warner Road, advised that this year Temecula Valley People Helping People have added an "Adopt-A-Senior" program. She invited the Councilmembers to attend an upcoming turkey dinner for the Seniors at Oscars, on Monday, December 15, 1997, 3:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. Mrs. Stone encouraged anyone interested in adopting a senior and/or a child to obtain names from various holiday trees located throughout the City. B. For Ms. Juliet Anne Boysen, 44060 Margarita Road, City Engineer Kicak addressed drainage issue with regard to her property as well as neighboring properties, ensuring Ms. Boysen that the developer of the neighboring lots will be required, on an interim basis, to provide an emergency overflow. He stated that, ultimately, the developer will be required to construct major storm drains, eliminating the flows which are tributary to the ditch located behind her property and, thereby, eliminating her concern of flooding. C. By way of photographs, Mrs. Beverly Stone, 43136 John Warner Road, apprised the Councilmembers of a public safety hazard and requested the Council's assistance with obtaining FEMA aid to construct a cement bridge over the drainage swale at John Warner Road. She advised that at this point in time because of the recent rains, the road is washed out and accessibility may only be obtained by way of a four-wheel drive vehicle. In response to Councilman Lindemans, she noted that approximately 20 homes are impacted by this road closure. Viewing this as an intolerable situation to the residents, Councilman Lindemans requested that the matter be placed on a future City Council agenda. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Ford noted that he would be providing an overview with regard to the Murrieta Creek Committee. Minutes/120997 2 Citv Council Minutes December 9. 1997 B. In order to properly apprise approaching motorists, Councilman Stone relayed his desire to expedite the installation of the warning lights at the City's new fire station. C. Commenting on the benefits derived by the use of computer technology, Mayor Roberts advised that he had received a tremendous amount of pertinent information with regard to this issue at the National League of Cities' Annual Meeting. He requested that this matter be agendized to a future City Council meeting and that in the interim, a City Technology Task Force be established. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. Resolution ADDroving List of Demand~ 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97 -130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3. City Treasurer's ReDort as of October 31. 1997 3.1 Receive and File Report. . Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bond and Labor and Materials Bond in Tract No, 22916-1 {located at the northwest corner of Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway) 4.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty bond for street, water, and sewer improvements and the Labor and Materials bond for Tract No. 22916-1; 4.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. w Riverside County Transportation Commission {RCTC) City of Temecula Measure "A" Loan Aareement 5.1 Approve the Agreement (Attachment A) between the City of Temecula and RCTC for a loan of $5,000,000 to be repaid through future Measure A entitlement; Minutes/120997 3 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 5.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the loan agreement between the City of Temecula and RCTC; 5.3 Make the following changes in fund allocations: a. Appropriate 91.2 million in Measure "A" funds to the State Highway 79 South from Interstate 15 to Avenida De Missions ("Missing Link") Project; b. Appropriate 93.8 million in Measure "A" funds to the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Project No. PW95-12); c. Eliminate the appropriation of 9258,870 for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Redevelopment Agency RDA); d. Eliminate the appropriation of #1.48 million for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Development Impact Fees - Street Improvements); e. Eliminate the appropriation of 92,061,130 for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Capital Project Reserves). Item pulled by Councilman Lindemans; see pages 7-8 for discussion. 6. Property Ac0uisition - Reelignment of Di{!z Road {~t Rancho California Road 6.1 Authorize the purchase of property located on the north side of Rancho California Road between Business Park Drive and Diaz Road for the proposed alignment of Diaz Road to Vincent Moraga Drive and approve the "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" in substantially the form of Attachment 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 6.2 Authorize the transfer of 9495,00.00 from Diaz Road Realignment Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Construction Account No. 210-165-632- 5804 to Land Acquisition Account No. 210-165-632-5700; 6.3 Appropriate 9650,000 from Capital Projects Reserve to CIP Budget for Diaz Road Land Acquisition Account No. 210-165-632-5700. Item pulled by Councilman Comerchero; see page 8 for discussion. . Western Riverside Council of Governments {WRCOG) end Son Bernardino County Associated Governments {SANBAG) Task Force Recommendation on Ele(;;tri(; Utility Restructurina 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes/120997 4 City Council Minutes December 9, 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 97 -131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL POWER PURCHASING POOL AGGREGATION . Tri~ffi(;; Controllers for Rancho California Road at I-1 5 Interchange and Highway 79 South st I-!5 Interchange 8.1 Direct staff to contact Caltrans to request the necessary permits to utilize traffic controllers (personnel) during the construction of these two locations; 8.2 Negotiate with a firm acceptable to the City and Caltrans the terms and conditions of the contract for such services. Inadvertently placed on the Consent Calendar, the Item was discussed later in the evening; see pages 17-18. . A~;ce_Dt Infrastructure ImDrovements in Paloma Del Sol relating to the Tract Nos. 2.4!31-1 and 24131-3 {located southwesterly of intersection of Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway) 9.1 Accept the infrastructure improvements in Paloma Del Sol relating to Tract No. 24131-1 and 24131-3 and authorize the reduction in Infrastructure Faithful Performance securities for street, drainage, and water and sewer improvements to warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. 10. Pro_Dosed "All-Way StoD" Ynez Road at La Paz Street 10.1 Approve the recommendations of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission as follows' a. b. c! d. e. Install "Stop" signs on northbound and southbound Ynez Road at La Paz Street to provide for a three-way "Stop." Install "Stop Ahead" and temporary flashing lights to warn motorists of "Stop Ahead." Add a dedicated lane southbound on Ynez Road for the right-turn movement onto La Paz Street. The length of turning lane to be determined by traffic counts. Install permanent flashing lights on northbound and southbound Ynez Road to warn motorists of the "Stop" sign ahead. Add more speed limit signs along this corridor. Minutes/120997 5 Council Minutes 10.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-132 December 9. 1997 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "STOP" LOCATION ON YNEZ ROAD AT LA PAZ STREET 10.3 Appropriate $37,250.00 from the General Fund Reserves to the Public Works Maintenance Division, Routine Street Maintenance Account. 11. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds - Tract No, 24135-! {located northwesterly corner of Pio Rico Road at Maroarita Road) 11.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities for street and drainage, and water and sewer public improvements in Tract No. 24135-1; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. 12. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No. 24135-3 {located at the southeasterlv corner of Santiago Road and Margarita Road) 1 2.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities for street and water and sewer improvements; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 13. Acce_Dtance of Subdivision Imorovements in Tract No. 24135-F {located northwesterly corner of Meadows Parkway at Leena Way) 13.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 24135-F and authorize initiation of the one-year warranty period. 13.2 Authorize reduction of the Faithful Performance Street and water and sewer security amounts and release the Subdivision Monumentation security; 13.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 14. Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained ~tre~t System (within Tract No. 24135-F {located easterly of the intersection of Margarita Road at Santiago R~)ed) 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes/120997 6 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 RESOLUTION NO. 97-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 24135-F) 15. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-21 15.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION III. F. 2., PARKING, OF OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN REVISING THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0221 ) MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 4, 7, and 9 - 15 (Item Nos. 5, 6 and 8 were pulled). The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time, Consent Calendar Item No. 5 was discussed. . Riverside County Transportation Commission {RCTC) City of Temecula Measure "A" Loan Agreement 5.1 Approve the Agreement (Attachment A) between the City of Temecula and RCTC for a loan of $5,000,000 to be repaid through future Measure A entitlement; 5.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the loan agreement between the City of Temecula and RCTC; 5.3 Make the following changes in fund allocations: a. Appropriate $1.2 million in Measure "A" funds to State Highway 79 South from Interstate 15 to Avenida De Missions ("Missing Link") Project; b. Appropriate $3.8 million in Measure "A" funds to the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Project No. PW95-12); c. Eliminate the appropriation of $258,870 for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Redevelopment Agency RDA); d. Eliminate the appropriation of #1.48 million for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Development Impact Fees - Street Improvements); e. Eliminate the appropriation of $2,061,130 for the Rancho California Road Interchange Project (Capital Project Reserves). Minutes/120997 7 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 Considering the City's appropriation of Measure "A" funds to be a fraction of the collected sales tax, Councilman Lindemans suggested the formation of a subcommittee, on which he offered to serve, to further address the matter. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved, seconded by Councilman Lindemans, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 5. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time, Consent Calendar Item No. 6 was discussed. . Pro_Dertv Acouisition - Realignment of Diaz Road at Rancho California Road 6.1 Authorize the purchase of property located on the north side of Rancho California Road between Business Park Drive and Diaz Road for the proposed alignment of Diaz Road to Vincent Moraga Drive and approve the "Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions" in substantially the form of Attachment 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 6.2 Authorize the transfer of $495,00.00 from Diaz Road Realignment Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Construction Account No. 210-165-632- 5804 to Land Acquisition Account No. 210-165-632-5700; 6.3 Appropriate $650,000 from Capital Projects Reserve to CIP Budget for Diaz Road Land Acquisition Account No. 210-165-632-5700. In response to Councilman Comerchero's request, City Manager Bradley, for the benefit of the public, provided an overview of the proposed property acquisition and its associated expenditure. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved, seconded by Councilman Stone, to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 6. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:42 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Westside Improvement Authority. At 8:00 P.M., the Council recessed and reconvened the meeting at 8:16 P.M. to discuss regularly scheduled City Council business. At 7:45 P.M., the following item was discussed in joint session with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency: 3. International Rectifier Fab-9 Owner Partici.Dation Agreement 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes/120997 8 City Council Minutes December 9. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Redevelopment Director McLarney presented the staff report (as per agenda material). For Councilman Lindemans, Ms. McLarney provided additional clarification with regard to the incentive reimbursements to the developer. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved, seconded by Councilman Comerchero, to adopt Resolution Nos. 97-134 and 97-09. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. , Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority Establishing the Westside Improvement Authority 4.1 Adopt a City Council resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 4.2 Adopt a Redevelopment Agency resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA 4.3 The City and the Redevelopment Agency execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Westside Improvement Authority. Minutes/120997 9 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 Due to a conflict of interest because of property ownership in Old Town, Councilman Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. City Manager Bradley presented that staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the staff report should be corrected to reflect the accurate Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement amount of ~ 104,500, not ~ 105,000. MOTION; Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 97-135 and No. RDA 97-10, and to execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Wests)de Improvement Authority. Councilman Comerchero seconded the motion was voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exce_oti0rl of Councilman Stone who abstained. At 8:16 P.M., after a short recess, the Council reconvened to discuss regularly scheduled City Council business. Public Hearinas 16. Planning A_D_Dlication NO, PA 97-0170 {Conditional Use Permit) - the design and construction of a 105.838 sauare foot self-storage facility with a two-story resident manager's unit and office building, and associated 0arking and landsca_ping within the Rori_Daugh Estates Soecific Plan (Planning Area 8) (located on the north side of Nicholas Road. north of the intersection of Rorioaugh and Nicholas Road). 16.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0170; 16.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0170; 16.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0170 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0170 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 105,838 SQUARE FOOT SELF- STORAGE FACILITY WITH A TWO-STORY RESIDENT MANAGER'S UNIT AND OFFICE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON 5.15 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NICHOLAS ROAD, NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF RORIPAUGH AND NICHOLAS ROADS, WITHIN THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-670-019 Community Development Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (of record), emphasizing staff's recommendation to deny the appeal and to uphold the Planning Commission's approval. Minutes/120997 10 City Council Minutes At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing. December 9. 1997 Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the applicant, thanked staff for their diligent efforts with regard to this project and clarified the following: that the existing easement will be moved to the center of the subject site -- away from the existing homes; that for visual appearance, the proposed buildings were turned to eliminate an undesirable view from the residential homes; that landscape buffer zones are being provided along the property lines; that the existing chain-link fence will be removed and replaced with a wrought iron fence where shrubs, trees, and vines will be planted for additional screening; that the wall along the residential boundary will be approximately 6' to 10' high; that of the eight homes adjacent to the subject site, four are single-story homes and four are two-story homes; that because the storage units are only 10' high, most of the eight homes will not be able to look over the wall and view the storage facility, with the exception of the two-story residences which will be able to see the facility from the second story; that hours of operation have been imposed; that the playing of loud music and use of stereos will be precluded by way of posted signage; that the lease agreement will prohibit utilizing the facility as a rehearsal site for band practice; that the lease agreement will also prohibit the storage of hazardous materials; and that the facility may not be utilized as a place of business; that each building will be sprinklered along with an alarm system; that storm run-off from the subject site will flow into two existing pipes and then drain into the flood channel. Referencing the partial transcript of the January 25, 1994, City Council meeting (copies provided to the Councilmembers), Mr. Sam Alhadeff, 27555 Ynez Road, #203, relayed his understanding of the Council's and the property owner's intent, at that particular meeting, to rezone the property of discussion (Planning Area 8) to commercial office. Clarifying that he had appealed this case upon the request of the residents, Councilman Lindemans stated that, in his opinion, on January 25, 1994, it was the primary opinion of the Council, property owner, and the residents to eliminate the potential of multi-residential development from Planning Area 8 and, therefore, rezone the area to Commercial Office versus Office Professional. Having reviewed various documents with regard to this issue, City Attorney Thorson stated that, in his opinion, the existing Specific Plan for Roripaugh Estates (SP164) governs the uses permitted on the subject site. Mr. Scott Barnard, 840 Newport Center Drive, #420, Newport Beach, representing the applicant, noted that the applicant has made numerous revisions to ensure the proposed Minutes/120997 11 Citv Council Minutes December 9. 1997 facility would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Barnard advised that although to no avail, attempts were made to discuss the issue with the opponents but that the opponents were not desirous to discuss the matter with the applicant. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed project: Mr. Bruce Weckesser - Mr. Del James - Ms. Jayne Carney - Mr. Don Morton - Mr. Eric Rial - 2744 Bolandro Center 27546 Jon Christian Place 39537 June Road 25573 Dandelion Court 39531 June Road Issues raised by the above-mentioned residents included the following: that the City Council had promised the residents that Planning Area 8 would be rezoned to Office Professional; that the proposed use will not be an appropriate use for the subject site nor a compatible use with the surrounding neighborhood; and that a storage facility should not be located next to a residential area; that the proposed facility would negatively impact the property values of the surrounding residences; that a facility such as the one proposed should be located in an area zoned Light Industrial; that the planting of bottle brush trees would not be acceptable; that hazardous materials could be stored at the subject site. Referencing the "White Sheet," Mr. Markham noted that the property of discussion has been zoned Office Commercial. He advised that the proposed facility will be consistent with General Plan zoning as well as the Specific Plan; that the subject site would be a conditionally permitted use; and that of the permitted uses for Planning Area 8 as per Ordinance No. 348, the proposed use would have the least amount of impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Markham relayed the applicant's willingness to work with Planning Department staff with regard to types of shrubs/trees which will be planted. In closing, he requested that the City Council approve the project. In response to Councilman Stone, Mr. Markham relayed that the property owner, Mr. Roripaugh, concurred with the City, regarding funding sidewalk improvements to the high school contingent upon a reimbursement agreement and based on future developments. By way of a color rendering, Mr. Markham described the architectural appearance of the subject site, including landscaping. In light of the assessed amount for the parcel of discussion, Councilman Lindemans referenced the "White Sheet" and stated that the subject site has been zoned Office Commercial. Councilman Lindemans addressed the applicant's willingness to work with staff relative to the Minutes/120997 12 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 type of landscaping planted as well as the applicant's willingness to enter into a reimbursement agreement assuring sidewalk improvements to the high school. Considering the conditionally permitted uses for the subject site, he viewed the proposed use as one of the most benign uses. Having reviewed pertinent documents with regard to this request, Councilman Comerchero advised that the City Council's actions are governed by law; that because the law supports the proposed use as a permitted use under Ordinance No. 348, the City Council must uphold the law. He noted that, in his opinion, of the permitted uses, the proposed use would have the least impact on the neighboring residents. Noting that his primary concern pertains to the eight homes abutting the subject site, Councilman Comerchero offered several alternatives in an effort to address lighting and noise concerns which, in turn, prompted Council discussion which resulted in the following suggestions: that access to the 20 to 25 storage spaces, facing the residents, be restricted to 12 times a year; that the 28' wide driveway be decreased to 24' wide and, thereby, increase the landscaped buffer zone by 4'. Because the subject site will be abutting a residential area, Mr. Markham advised that a 25' setback will be required. He advised that lights could be mounted in a way to ensure that lighting would not impact the residential units. Referencing the "White Sheet" (indicating a commercial zone to the north, south, and east of the Summerfield residences) as well as the transcript of the January 25, 1994, City Council meeting, Councilman Stone referenced a statement he had made at the January 25, 1994, Council meeting, supporting the deletion of dense multi-family development and, thereby favoring the Office Commercial zone. He as well commented on the support his statement received from the audience in attendance at the January 25, 1994, Council meeting. Commenting on the landscape buffering zones which are being proposed, he stated that the applicant has attempted to mitigate those concerns raised by the neighboring residents. If this project were approved, Mayor Roberts requested that an additional condition be imposed prohibiting the use of razor or barbed wire fencing, in addition to the reimbursement agreement on future developments to extend sidewalk access to ensure safe pedestrian accessibility to the high school. Viewing zoning as the major issue of confusion, Community Services Director Thornhill suggested that the City Council direct staff to proceed with an amendment to the current Specific Plan, clarifying that the remainder of the property (with the exclusion of the subject site) be rezoned to Office Professional. With regard to the parcel of discussion, Mr. Thornhill clarified that on January 25, 1994, there was no Office Professional designation and that it was staff's intent to zone the site as Office Commercial. Minutes/120997 13 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 In light of the proposed landscaping, Councilman Linderoans concurred that the proposed use would be barely be visible from the neighboring residences and concurred with Community Services Director Thornhill's suggestion to rezone the remainder of the property to Office Professional. Recalling the issues discussed at the January 25, 1994, City Council meeting as well as referencing the transcript of that meeting, Mayor Roberts pointed out various locations throughout the transcript where Office Professional had been referenced, including his personal reference to Office Professional; noted that in 1994, he signed a memorandum referencing Office Professional; that he does not recall an amendment to this zone; and that, therefore, he noted his opposition to the request. Councilman Ford relayed his concurrence with decreasing the width of the driveway (adjacent to the residents) by 4' in order to increase the landscape buffer zone. Because the residential homes are 24' high and the proposed facility will not exceed 10' high, Mr. Ford expressed no concern with regard to view impairment. Considering the limited amount of traffic and noise the proposed use would generate, Councilman Ford spoke in support of the request and concurred with Community Services Director Thornhill's suggestion to rezone the remainder of the property to Office Professional. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to concur with staff recommendation; to increase the landscape buffer zone along the perimeter adjacent to Summerfield by decreasing the proposed driveway (adjacent to the residences) by 4'; to limit access to those storage spaces located closest to the residential uses to 12 times a year; to prohibit the use of razor and barbed wire fencing; to amend the current Specific Plan, rezoning the remainder of the property to Office Professional; and to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant, assuring the completion of sidewalk improvements to the high school. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ford and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exce_otion of Mayor Roberts who voted no. At 9:56 P.M., a short recess was taken with the Council reconvening at 10:08 P.M. MOTION' Councilman Ford moved to extend the City Council meeting to 10:30 P.M. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 17. Planning A_D.olication No. PA97-0319: Amendment to Ordinance No. 91-26 pertaining to advertising regulations and establishin~o regulations for the use of ambient air balloons and other similar inflatables 17.1 Read by title only to introduce an ordinance entitled' Minutes/120997 14 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 ORDINANCE NO. 97-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 91-26, SECTION 19.8, SUBSECTION C.4 AND C.5 PERTAINING TO ADVERTISING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF TEMPORARY AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS AND OTHER SIMILAR INFLATABLES Community Services Director Thornhill presented the staff report (as per written material of record) and briefly reviewed the proposed amendments. At this time, Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing. No public input was received. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce Ordinance No. 97-22 for first reading. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. CQuncil Business 18. Murriet~l Creek U_odate - El Nino Presentation By way of slides, Senior Management Analyst Kuhns provided an overview of the impacts El Nino has and potentially will have on California, including the County of Riverside. She provided detailed information with regard to government readiness, communications, Emergency Resource Directory, FEMA Insurance, emergency supplies, out-of-State contacts, etc. City Manager Bradley advised that sand for sandbags is available at City Hall. 19. Amend Section 15.16.010 and add Section 15.16.020 P. of the Temecula Municipal Code 19.1 Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97 -23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 15.16.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REFERENCES TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND ADDING SECTION 15.16.020.P TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND AMENDMENTS THERETO TO BE CHARGED AS MISDEMEANORS OR INFRACTIONS Fire Marshall Windsor reviewed the proposed amendments (as per staff report). Minutes/120997 15 City Council Minutes December 9, 1997 MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce Ordinance No. 97-23 for first reading. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ford. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. City Attorney Thorson read the title of Ordinance No. 97-23. 20. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storaoe in Residential Area 20.1 Receive and File Report Advising that this matter has been continued from the October 20, 1997, City Council meeting, Community Services Director Thornhill informed the Councilmembers that staff is still in the process of reviewing the matter and that a staff report would be forwarded to the Council at a later date. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 21. Status U_Ddate of the Study of the Potential Annexation of the Redhawk/Vail Ranch Area 21.1 Receive and file report Councilman Ford noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. Community Services Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exce.Dtion of Councilman Ford who abstained. 22. ¢om_outer purchase Lo~n Pro_ar{!m 22.2 Designate $100,000 in the General Fund for an employee computer purchase loan program. Assistant to the City Manager Yates reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that of the 450 cities in the State of California, approximately 88 of them provide this type of program to their employees and that the actual cost of the program would be the interest lost on the $100,000 (approximately $5,000 to 6,000 thousand a year if the entire ~ 100,000 were expended). In addition to the lost interest, Councilman Lindemans noted that there would be an additional expenditure associated with the administration of the program. Not viewing this program as a necessary, ordinary business expense, Councilman Lindemans relayed his objection to the program. Minutes/120997 16 ~;itv Council Minutes Speaking in support of the program, Councilman Comerchero relayed his utilizing the actual computer equipment as collateral to secure the loan. December 9. 1997 preference with With regard to securing the loan, City Manager Bradley noted that since those employees applying for this program have passed the probation period, typically each employee would have sufficient comprehensive annual leave hours to pay off the majority of the loan. Concurring with Councilman Lindemans' comments, Councilman Stone voiced no objection with the City purchasing an additional five computers which could be lent out to the employees. Having discussed the proposed program informally with the employees, City Clerk Greek noted that she would estimate that approximately 20 applications would be immediately submitted after the approval of this program. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to extend the Council meeting to 10:45 P.M. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to deny staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote reflected approval of the motion with the ~xce_otion of Mayor Roberts and Councilman Comerchero who vote no. At this time, Consent Calendar Item No. 8 was discussed. . Traffic Controllers for Rancho California Road at I-15 Interchange and Highway 79 South at 1-15 Interchange 8.1 Direct staff to contact Caltrans to request the necessary permits to utilize traffic controllers (personnel) during the construction of these two locations; 8.2 Negotiate with a firm acceptable to the City and Caltrans the terms and conditions of the contract for such services. City Engineer Kicak provided the staff report (as per written material). In order to expedite the exiting process from the freeway, Councilman Lindemans commented on the current traffic situation and recommended the use of manual traffic control. He requested that a study be completed, determining the cost of adding two additional lanes, extending as far back as possible on the freeway, in order to assure an expeditious and safe exiting route from the freeway. Because the existing traffic signals are properly working, Mayor Roberts stated that, in his opinion, the use of manual traffic control would not aid in funneling more traffic volume through the intersection. Minutes/120997 17 City Council Minutes December 9. 1997 Advising such lanes could not be designed by City staff in order to obtain Caltrans approval, City Engineer Kicak noted that staff would provide the cost estimate for the construction of such lanes. Noting that the synchronization of traffic signals will be completed in four to six weeks, Mr. Kicak advised that this would further aid in funneling a higher volume of traffic per hour through this particular area. In an effort to provide a more expedient travel path, Councilman Ford suggested that the right westbound lane on Rancho California Road (utilized to enter the northbound freeway on-ramp) be striped for a yield similar to the one on SR79 south. In response to Mayor Roberts, City Engineer Kicak noted that staff would work on obtaining Caltrans approval for the SR79 south encroachment permit. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to concur with staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. City Manager's ReDort None given. City Attorney's ReDort With regard to closed session, City Attorney Thorson noted the following: Item No, I (Real Property - City of Temecula and KI KFLA Rancho Realty) - item was discussed and approved as Consent Calendar Item No. 6. [[eJ:B_l~.~. (Real Property - City of Temecula, Connie Hill, and Dean Hill) - City Council set just compensation and staff will be conveying the information to the property owners. Item No. 3 (Pending Litigation - Connie Hill v. City of Temecul~) - an update was provided to the City Council. Item No. 4 (Potential Litigation - two matters) - issues were not discussed. Item No, 5 (Real Property - City of Temecula, John Firestone, and Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1) - will be forwarded to the Westside Improvement Authority meeting of January 13, 1997, for approval. Minutes/120997 18 City Council Minutes December 9, 1 ~7 Adiournment At 10:48 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Minutes/120997 19 INDEX CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 16, 1997 SUBJECT PAGE CALL TO ORDER EXECUTIVE SESSION 1,9 ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 2-8 COUNCIL BUSINESS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT 9 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 16, 1997 EXECUTIVE SESSION An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Main Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, to discuss closed session items as noted below: §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator (three matters); 1) Property: approximately 120 acres located westerly of Pujol street; Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula, John Firestone and Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1; Under negotiation: price and terms of payment of potential acquisition. 2) Property: 42111 Avenida Alvarado; Negotiating Parties: Western TelCom and City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Terms and Conditions of an Owner/Participation Agreement; 3) Property: 27555 Commerce Center Drive; Negotiating Parties: Redevelopment Agency and Generic Manufacturing; Under negotiation: Terms and Conditions of a Development Agreement §54956.9(a), Pending Litigation (three cases) 1) Cal Paloma Del Sol vs. City of Temecula 2) Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, et al. 3) Bankruptcy of Blind Pig Brewery §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator regarding portion of property located east of Margarita Road, directly north of the Winchester Creek Development: Negotiating Parties - Stephen A. Bieri Company and the City of Temecula: Under negotiation: Consideration of acquisition agreement. The Temecula City Council reconvened at 7:12 P.M. in City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, to consider regularly scheduled City Council business. Mayor Roberts presiding. Minutes\ 121697 1 City Counci Minutes 121697 PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and Roberts. ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None. Also present were City Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Greek. PRELUDE MUSIC In lieu of prelude and intermission music, a videotape was shown, promoting the Christmas theme for Old Town "Dickens of a Christmas." INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Doug Cole, Church of Christ. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilman Stone. PUBLIC COMMENTS; None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Ford briefly commented on upcoming Christmas activities in Old Town. B. Considering the time of the Season, Councilman Comerchero encouraged those individuals more fortunate than others to be thankful for what they have and to share and to aid those that are less fortunate. C. Having received numerous calls with regard to potholes throughout the City, Councilman Lindemans relayed his desire to formulate a method by which these potholes are reported in a timely fashion and repaired in an expedient manner. He suggested the aid of the Police Department to which Lt. Jim Domenoe advised that police officers currently report potholes to the City. Lt. Domenoe noted that he would discuss the matter with City Engineer Kicak in order to devise a more expedient method of reporting. D. Mayor Roberts advised that the City Council would be returning to closed session at the end of regular business. Mayor Roberts wished everyone a Happy Holiday Season. Minutes\ 121697 2 Citv Council Minutes December 16. 1997 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda, 2. ADoroyal of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 18, 1997 2.2 Approve the minutes of November 25, 1997 3. Resolution AD0roving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A . Contract Insoection Services for Buildin(~ and Safety -- 4.1 Approve and appropriation of $35,000 to Account Number 001-162-999-5118 "Temporary Help." 4.2 Approve an amendment to an existing agreement for consulting services with J.A.S. Pacific Consulting Services, Inc., in the amount of $35,000 to provide building inspection services to the Building and Safety Department. , ADoroyal of Parcel MaD No. 24085-F _ _ {Located Northwestern of the intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive - ^venial{} de Ventas) 5.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24085-F subject to the conditions of approval. . A_~_~roval of Parcel Mao No. ;24085-3 {Located Northwesterly of the intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive - Avenid8 de Ventas) 6.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24085-3 subject to the conditions of approval. . A_D_Droval of Tract MaD No. 24185-1 {Located South of Sunny Meadows Drive. East of Camoanula Way and North of Minutes\ 121697 3 Ci~v Council Minu~es December 18. 1 ~7 DePortola Road) 7.1 Approve Tract approval. Map No. 24185-1 in conformance with the conditions of e Approval of Tract MaD No. 24186-1 {Located on the Northeast corner of Meadows Parkway and Leena Way! 8.1 Approve Tract Map No. 24186-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval. . ADDroYal of Parcel MaD No. 28530-1 _ _ {Located on the Southeast corner of Winchester Road [Highway 79 North1 and Yne~ Road) 9.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28530-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval. This item was pulled and discussed later in the evening; see page 7. 10. Approval of Tract MaD No. 24186-2 {Located South of Sunny Meadows Drive and West of Jerez Lane) 10.1 Approve Tract Map No. 24186-2 in conformance with the conditions of approval. 11. Acceptance of Public Street into the City-maintained Street System {within Parcel Map 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 27232) 12. Accept Public Improvements in Parcel MaD No. 27987-1 {Located South of Hi_~hwav 79 South. between Redhawk Parkway and Country Glen WSy) 12.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 27987-1 and authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance security to the warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Minutes\121697 4 Ci~v Council Minutes December 15, 1997 13. Acceotance of Public Imorovements in Parcel MaD No. 27232 (Located at the Northwesterly corner of Rancho California Road and Lvndie Lane) 13.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 27232 and authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance security to the warranty level, release the Subdivision Monument and Traffic Signalization securities and initiation of the one-year warranty period. 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 14. Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System - Within Parcel Mao No. 27987-1) (Located at the Southwest corner of Hiahwav 79 South at Redhawk _ Parkway) 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 27987-1) 15. Professional Services Engineering Agreement - BidAmerica for Archiving Plan Room Files to Comouter Discs 15.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement between BidAmerica and the City to provide Compact discs (CDS) of the Public Works Maps and Improvement Plans by scanning the documents and to create a database table compatible with the Sierra System to retrieve and reproduce these plans through the City Computer Network and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 15.2 Approve an appropriation of $30,000 from the General Fund Reserves to the Public Works Consulting Services Account No. 001-163-999-5248 for creating a database table, labeling and scanning approximately 11,000 plan sheets and 6,000 aperture (microfiche) cards onto Computer Discs. This includes providing BidVue software for printing and viewing the documents for five (5) work stations. 16. Quitclaim Public Utility Easements over a oortion of Temecula Reaioni~l Milli Site _ (Located Southwesterly of Margarita Road and Northerly of _oro_oosed Overland Drive) 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes\ 121697 5 City Counoil Minutee Dooembor 10, 1 {t~P7 RESOLUTION NO. 97-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF CERTAIN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TO THE UNDERLYING FEE OWNERS (PORTION OF TRACT NO. 3334 FOR PORTION OF TEMECULA REGIONAL MALL SITE SOUTHWESTERLY OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTHERLY OF PROPOSED OVERLAND DRIVE) 17. Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities in Tract No. 21675-5 17.1 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities for Public Street, Water and Sewer improvements in Tract No. 21675-5. 17.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties. 18. Reduce Faithful Performance Bond Amount in Parcel MaD No. 26232-2 (Located at the Southeast corner of the intersection of Winchester Road and Nichola-; Road} 18.1 Authorize a thirty-one percent (31%) reduction in Faithful Performance bond amount for street lights, sidewalk, driveways and median improvements. 18.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 19. ADDrove Plans and Specifications and Award Construction Contract for the FY 97-98 Street StriDing Program. Project No. PW 97-28 19.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications for the FY 97-98 Street Striping Program. 19.2 Award a contract for the FY 97-98 Street Striping Program, Project No. PW 97-28 to Pacific Striping, Inc. for $78,150.50 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 19.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,815.05 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 20. Second Readin(] of Ordinance No. 97-22 -- 20.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled' Minutes\121697 6 City Coun=il Minute~ December 16. 1997 ORDINANCE NO. 97-22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 91-26, SECTION 19.8, SUBSECTION C.4 AND C.5 PERTAINING TO ADVERTISING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF TEMPORARY AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS AND OTHER SIMILAR INFLATABLES 21. Second Readino of Ordinance No. 97-23 21.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97-23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 15.16.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REFERENCES TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND ADDING SECTION 15.16.020p TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE TO ALLOW CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND AMENDMENTS THERETO TO BE CHARGED AS MISDEMEANORS OR INFRACTIONS MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. I through 8 and 10 through 21 (Item No. 9 was pulled). The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Councilman Comerchero who abstained with regard to Item No. 2.1 (Minutes of November 18, 1997). At this time, Consent Calendar Item No. 9 was discussed. . ADDroval of Parcel MaD No. 28530-1 _ _ (Located on the Southeast corner of Winchester Road [Hi(~hwav 79 North] and Ynez -- Road! 9.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28530-1 in conformance with the conditions of approval. City Engineer Kicak reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). Although there has been a delay in the agreements and securities for monumentation of the Parcel Map, Mr. Kicak relayed staff's recommendation to approve the final Parcel Map but that recordation of the Map be delayed until the delivery of the agreements and securities. MOTION: Councilman Stone, seconded by Councilman Comerchero, moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:26 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Westside Improvement Authority. At 7:32 P.M., the City Council meeting was reconvened to discuss regularly scheduled City Council Minutes\121697 7 City Counoil Minutes O~cember 16. 1997 business. COUNCIL BUSINESS 22. ADoointment of Community Services Commission Member 22.1 Review the Ad Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one applicant to fill an unexpired term through October 10,1999. City Clerk Greek presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the Ad Hoc Committee is recommending the appointment of Mr. James Meyler. In light of Mr. Mike Naggar's continuous efforts to serve the City, Councilman Lindemans made the following motion: MOTION: Councilman Lindemans nominated Mr. Mike Naggar to serve on the Community Services Commission. (This motion died for the lack of a second.) Considering the number of qualified applicants from which the Ad Hoc Committee had to choose, including Mr. Naggar's, Councilman Stone, echoed by Councilman Comerchero, commented on the difficulty the Committee had to make its decision and briefly commented on the criteria used in making the decision. Having previously served on the Community Services Commission, Councilman Comerchero noted that although Mr. Meyler's credentials are impeccable, he chose Mr. Meyler because he was of the opinion that Mr. Meyler would be a perfect fit for the Commission. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to appoint Mr. James Meyler to the Community Services Commission. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Bradley wished everyone a Happy Holiday Season and a Safe and Prosperous New Year. At 7:42 P.M., the City Council convened in closed session. At 8:34 P.M., the City Council reconvened in open session with City Attorney Thorson making the following statements: CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT With respect to the three Real Estate matters, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council gave direction to City staff; that no action was taken; and that final action would be taken in open session. Minutes\121697 8 City Counoil Minutes December 16. 1 ~7 With regard to the three pending litigation matters, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council authorized him to proceed with legal action necessary to collect the outstanding debt on the Blind Pig Brewery Small Business Loan. Councilman Lindemans requested that the discussion of potential acquisition of a 15.8 acre parcel, located directly adjacent to the RogersDale property, be agendized for the January 13, 1998, City Council meeting. Adiournment At 8:36 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 432000 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Minutes\121697 9 ITEM 3 RESOLU~ON NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,979,238.35. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] R~sos 97- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 16th day of December, 1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Rcsos 97- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 12/11/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/18/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/24/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/31/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/13~97 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/11/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 12/24/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01113/98 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 120 165 190 191 192 193 194 195 210 280 300 320 330 390 GENERAL FUND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TCSD - DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 165 190 191 192 193 194 280 300 320 330 34O GENERAL RDA-LOW/MOD TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-ClP INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: GENI~?O _ RTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER~~._ $ 315,204.75 380,873.05 202,187.34 1,150,270.10 608,773.42 158,523.59 163,406.10 $ 2~979~238.35 775 348.45 2 700.00 14 748.79 145 241.41 20 452.56 24 059.26 38 115.58 1,033 970.03 4,968.00 353,274.57 72,903.61 119,909.84 25,788.10 7,417.37 17,148.63 1,262.48 2,657,308.66 222,185.61 1 O,O73.97 57,006.58 142.71 367.32 4,527.61 1,989.31 9,698.93 1,329.17 5,877.92 1,594.27 7,136.29 321,929.69 $ 2~979~238.35 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. R:tWE S TONR~ C C TPA YlL 083WK$1. WB2 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 14 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LC~//MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 122,037.06 5,162.56 36,160.88 4,870.51 107.48 4,436.08 691.57 11,405.13 15,534.69 100,675.94 4,803.85 1,786.33 7,532.67 315,204.75 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 46810 12/04/97 46812 12/05/97 46814 12/09/97 46815 12/09/97 46816 12/09/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 813260 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 892359 12/11/97 VENDOR NUMBER 00228~ 000175 002270 002578 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 VENDOR MANE BATES, MICHAEL · EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI ROADRUNNERS MOBILE MUSI TEMEKU HILLS REC, LIC INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O( (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/O((IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) ]NSTATAX (]RS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTATAX (IRS) INSTAT/g((EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EOD) INSTATAX (EOD) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX (EO0) INSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDO) INSTAT/O((EDD) iNSTATAX (EDD) INSTATAX (EDD) CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REFUND: BASKETBALL LEAGUE ~97 EMPLOYEElS HOLIDAY PARTY CAFR AWARD APPLICATION FEE DJ SERVS:~97 HOLIDAY PARTY DEPOSIT FOR 98 HOLIDAY PARTY 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE · 000444 SDI 0004~4 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 SDI 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000~4 STATE 0004/~4 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-4994 001-150-999-5265 001-140-999-5250 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5265 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 33O-2O7O 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 340-2070 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 40.00 6,568.69 415.00 375.00 600.00 16,277.86 662.25 3,853.86 9.50 24.26 311.69 141.93 595.68 97.89 569.88 109.14 479.16 3,996.80 176.92 1,052.02 2.49 6.40 78.65 36.88 174.50 25.46 122.58 27.02 122.78 29.94 8.48 45 .29 3.55 2.7'4 4,337.21 204.26 935.11 1.86 4.39 25.63 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 40.00 6,568.69 415.00 375.00 600.00 28,955.60 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 892359 12/11/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 189.40 892359 12/11/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 27.46 892359 12/11/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 133.51 892359 12/11/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 22.95 892359 12/11/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 113.77 6,150.92 46819 12/11/97 002999 A BASKET FULL MARKETING & PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 280-199-999-5270 21.25 21.25 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 498.09 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 12.90 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 51.98 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 .52 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 14.64 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 4.29 46820 12/11/97 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 19.78 602.20 46821 12/11/97 A W DIRECT INC MASTER KIT FOR CODE ENFORCEMNT 001-162-999-5242 70.29 70.29 46822 12/11/97 002410 A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN NOV JANITORIAL SRVCS-PARKS 190-180-999-5250 1,933.00 1,933.00 46823 12/11/97 ADVANTAGE CHEM-DRY REFUND:BASKETBALL 190-183-4994 40.00 40.00 46824 12/11/97 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SERVICES-MARGARITA PARK 210-190-119-5802 1,859.11 46824 12/11/97 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SERVICES FOR ADA PARK 210-190-148-5802 300.00 2,159.11 46825 12/11/97 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE MAILING MACH. SERVICE CONTRACT 330-199-999-5217 46825 12/11/97 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE ASCOM SCALE SERVICE AGREEMENT 330-199-999-5217 545.00 145.00 690.00 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/8 HUSO 001-150-999-5118 112.88 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/8 GROVES 001-161-999-5118 180.60 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/8 HUSO 280-199-999-5118 43.54 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/8 HUSO 165-199-999-5118 43.54 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/22 GROVES 001-161-999-5118 180.60 46826 12/11/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/22 HUSO 001-110-999-5118 103.20 664.36 46827 12/11/97 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 164.59 4682? 12/11/97 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR MAINT FAC. 340-199-701-5240 47.79 4682? 12/11/97 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 23.59 235.97 46828 12/11/97 001943 B R W, INC. FLASHING BEACONS:VAR. LOCATNS 210-165-672-5802 4,358.45 4,358.45 46829 12/11/97 000402 BERG, MARK PLANS EXAMINAR CERTIFICATION 001-162-999-5261 155.00 155.00 46830 12/11/97 001260 C P R $ PRK OPERATIONS CF:NELSON 3/12 190-180-999-5258 45.00 45.00 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, GENERAL LIABILITY INS. 97/98 300-199-999-5200 99,800.00 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 9? 001-2370 3,505.43 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 165-2370 125.60 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 190-2370 1,244.28 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES~ WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 191-2370 .82 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 192-2370 2.02 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 193-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 194-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 280-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 300-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 320-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 330-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 340-2370 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 190-183-999-5112 46831 12/11/97 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKER COMP FOR NOV 97 190-181-999-5112 64.43 24.31 94.57 8.04 41.24 8.06 221.03 .68 1.38 105,141.89 46832 12/11/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV QTR 3 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENT 001-2280 46832 12/11/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV QTR 3 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENT 001-2290 46832 12/11/97 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT/CONSERV CITY~S 5% STRONG MOTION 001-162-4229 46833 12/11/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA PLANT 15 GAL. SWEETSHADE TREE 340-199-701-5415 46833 12/11/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CRC LDSC IMPROVEMENTS 190-180-999-5415 3,599.43 2,213.34 290.64- 47.00 3,645.00 5,522.13 3,692.00 46834 12/11/97 001655 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY WELDING SERVS & SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218 6.60 6.60 46835 12/11/97 CDM/WESTMAR COMMERCIAL REFUND:ENGINEERING DEPOSIT 001-2670 46836 12/11/97 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC NOV ALARM SRVCS-SEN CENTER 190-181-999-5250 1,000.00 45.00 1,000.00 45.00 46837 12/11/97 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS DE-BEERS SOFTBALLS 190-183-999-5380 128.91 128.91 46838 12/11/97 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE DELIVERY CHARGE:IDRC CF 280-199-999-5270 25.00 25.00 46839 12/11/97 003057 CLEVER KIDS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION:CLEVER KIDS 190-180-999-5226 24.95 24.95 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 39.75 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2330 39.75 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 001-2330 66.50 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 190-2330 60.88 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 193-2330 .94 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 800 A&S 340-2330 4.68 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-2330 107.02 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 165-2330 19.41 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 22.32 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 193-2330 1.59 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 6.47 46840 12/11/97 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 340-2330 7.9? 377.28 46841 12/11/97 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS CLOWN FOR SPOOKTACULER 190-183-999-5370 150.00 150.00 46842 12/11/97 003037 CONWAY DATA, INC. MAGAZINE ADVERTISEMENT:OCT 97 280-199-999-5270 46843 12/11/97 003059 COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBER COSTCO MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 98 001-140-999-5226 46843 12/11/97 003059 COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBER COSTCO MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 98 190-180-999-5226 46844 12/11/97 001629 CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC HINTERGARDT PRK LDSC IMPROVMNT 190-180-999-5415 4,466.75 30.00 20.00 2,065.00 4,466.75 50.00 2,065.00 VOUCHREZ 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46845 12/11/97 CRINGAN, ALAN J. REFUND:PARK RENTALS 190-183-4988 30.00 30.00 46846 12/11/97 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-164-601-5218 13.87 13.87 46847 12/11/97 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AMIN 001-2340 15.00 46847 12/11/97 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADV 001-1180 8.81 46847 12/11/97 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.81 46847 12/11/97 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-REV 001-1180 8.81- 46847 12/11/97 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 8.81 32.62 46848 12/11/97 003024 DISPLAY SALES CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 580.00 46848 12/11/97 003024 DISPLAY SALES FREIGHT 280-199-999-5362 38.50 618.50 46849 12/11/97 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK NOV 97 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 300-2180 435.90 435.90 46850 12/11/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 11/21 DIAZ 001-140-999-5118 46850 12/11/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP ¢2)W/E 11/21 CABRAL 001-171-999-5118 1,623.67 1,229.67 2,853.34 46851 12/11/97 002712 ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN NOC ECONOMIC CONSULTING SRVCS 280-199-999-5248 1,000.00 1,000.00 46852 12/11/97 002946 ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING, CITY HALL - REglRE FIXTURES 340-199-701-5212 188.54 188.54 46853 12/11/97 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION SEPT PLAN CHECK SRVCS-REVISED 001-162-999-5248 4,298.78 46853 12/11/97 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION CREDIT:INVOICE PD:THEN REVISED 001-162-999-5248 3,561.78- 737.00 46854 12/11/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION REPAIRS 190-180-999-5415 44.35 44.35 46855 12/11/97 002809 EXPERIAN CREDIT APS FOR RDA 280-199-999-5250 100.00 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 6.50 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 52.97 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 8.00 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-140-999-5230 40.94 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAlL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 19.00 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 35.50 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 8.50 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-164-604-5230 17.50 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 16.60 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAll SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 8.00 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 8.00 46856 12/11/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 7.00 100.00 228.51 46857 12/11/97 FIVE STAR CONFERENCE AUDIO CASSETTES FOR LEAGUE CF 190-180-999-5228 76.46 76.46 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 001-2360 646.00 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 165-2360 15.90 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 190-2360 127.08 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 191-2360 .42 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 192-2360 1.28 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 193-2360 13.61 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 194-2360 7.65 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 280-2360 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 300-2360 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 320-2360 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 330-2360 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LIFE INS 340-2360 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 001-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 165-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 190-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 191-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 192-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 193-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 194-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 280-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 300-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 320-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 330-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 LTD 340-2380 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 001-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 165-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 190-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 191-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 192-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 193-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 194-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 280-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 300-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 320-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 330-2500 46858 12/11/97 002002 FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO 002002 STD 340-2500 46860 12/11/97 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. MISC TOOLS & EQUIP FOR MAINT 001-164-601-5218 22.35 4.25 17.00 8.50 19.96 1,160.98 41.61 215.71 .82 2.01 23.05 11.79 51.05 7.58 40.49 8.07 26.34 1,228.33 44.01 228.22 .87 2.14 24.39 12.45 54.03 8.02 42.84 8.54 27.86 34.01 4,155.20 34.01 46861 12/11/97 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 190-2140 122.82 46861 12/11/97 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 280-2140 25.00 147.82 46862 12/11/97 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-120-999-5220 37.07 37.07 46863 12/11/97 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS MGMNT SKILL CF:BROCKMEIER:2/10 001-162-999-5261 149.00 149.00 46864 12/11/97 000184 46864 12/11/97 000184 46864 12/11/97 000184 46864 12/11/97 000184 46864 12/11/97 000184 46865 12/11/97 000481 46866 12/11/97 003030 46866 12/11/97 003030 46866 12/11/97 003030 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GRAFIGONE, INC GRAFIGONE, INC GRAFIGONE, INC 909-308-1079-NOV-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-694-8927-NOV-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909 695-1409 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-695-3539-NOV-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 909-699-2309-NOV-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 165-199-999-5250 CITY ENTRY SIGNS MAINTENANCE FREIGHT SALES TAX 210-199-130-5804 210-199-130-5804 210-199-130-5804 55.29 25.90 87.40 37.37 35.65 1,800.00 759.00 20.00 58.82 241.61 1,800.00 837.82 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 46867 12/11/97 46868 12/11/97 46869 12/11/97 46869 12/11/97 46870 12/11/97 46871 12/11/97 46871 12/11/97 46871 12/11/97 46871 12/11/97 46872 12/11/97 46873 12/11/97 46874 12/11/97 46875 12/11/97 46875 12/11/97 46876 12/11/97 46877 12/11/97 46878 12/11/97 46879 12/11/97 46879 12/11/97 46879 12/11/97 46879 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46880 12/11/97 46881 12/11/97 46882 12/11/97 46883 12/11/97 46~N~4 12/11/97 46884 12/11/97 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT HATHORN, BELINDA ITF REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 001013 HINDERLITER deLLAMAS AS QTR 4 PROPERTY TAX REPORTS 001-140-999-5248 HOVE, CORBETT R. HOVE, CORBETT R. REFUND:PRKG CIT#11678 PD TWICE 001-2260 REFUND:PRKG CIT#11678 PD TWICE 001-170-4055 000796 I C B 0 FIRE PREVENTION CF:2/10-13/98 001-171-999-5261 100.00 2,400.00 5.00 20.00 225.00 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,881.09 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.76 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 385.28 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 34.23 190-2900 IMANI TEMPLE OF TEMECUL REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 000198 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0 MEMBERSHIP DUES:THORNHILL 1/99 001-161-999-5226 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 11/23 MILES 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 11/23 MILES 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 11/2 THOMAS 001-150-999-5118 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC CRC POOL MAINTENANCE, SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LANDSCAPE & MAINT SUPPLIE 001-164-601-5218 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE TONER CARTRIDGES W/ EXCHANGE 320-199-999-5221 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE REFURB TONER CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE REFURB TONER CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE 5 YEAR RECOGNITION PINS 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE 5 YEAR RECOGNITION PINS 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE 5 YEAR RECOGNITION PINS 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE 5 YEAR RECOGNITION PINS 001-150-999-5265 002512 LA MASTERS OF FINE JEWE SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV AIR:SAAVY CF 9/11-12 J.MEYER 280-199-999-5258 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH WELK MUSICAL X-MAS EXCURSION 190-183-4980 002933 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP OCT PROF SRVCS-PW97-26 210-165-692-5802 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY 001-140-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 ELECTRIC COIN COUNTER ELECTRIC COIN COUNTER 100.00 299.76 ~.00 91.00 273.00 61.75 31.38 162.88 704.00 138.00 66.00 70.37 750.00 58.13 1,425.00 110.44 750.00 58.12 75.00 5.81 335.00 209.37 2,039.02 592.50 592.50 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 2,400.00 25.00 225.00 2,319.36 100.00 299.76 75.00 364.00 61.75 31.38 162.88 978.37 3,232.50 335.00 209.37 2,039.02 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46884 12/11/97 003054 LYNDE-ORDWAY SALES TAX 001-140-999-5610 45.92 46884 12/11/97 003054 LYNOE-ORDWAY SALES TAX 190-180-999-5610 45.92 1,276.84 46885 12/11/97 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND 15 PW STAFF REG MSA MTG 12/18 001-163-999-5260 45.00 46885 12/11/97 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND 15 PW STAFF REG MSA MTG 12/18 001-164-601-5260 105.00 46885 12/11/97 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND 15 PW STAFF REG MSA MTG 12/18 001-164-604-5260 45.00 46885 12/11/97 000394 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND 15 PW STAFF REG MSA MTG 12/18 001-165-999-5260 30.00 225.00 46886 12/11/97 001311 MANGUSING, STUART RAIN GEAR FOR PW MAINT CREWS 001-163-999-5218 75.38 46886 12/11/97 001311 MANGUSING, STUART RAIN GEAR FOR PW MAINT CREWS 001-165-999-5242 37.69 113.07 46887 12/11/97 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIALS 190-183-999-5380 1,135.20 1,135.20 46888 12/11/97 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. BLANK COMBS FOR BINDING 001-140-999-5222 40.00 46888 12/11/97 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 3.10 43.10 46889 12/11/97 MILGARD MANUAFACTURING REFUND: FORFEIT FEES 190-183-4994 40.00 40.00 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:B.BURON 001-164-604-5222 102.50 46890 12/11/97 00138/, MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:LARRY COOLEY 001-163-999-5222 38.25 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-164-604-5222 7.94 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-163-999-5222 2.97 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:BRUCE WEDEKING 190-180-999-5222 38.25 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-180-999-5222 2.96 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS:GENERIC 001-120-999-5222 38.25 46890 12/11/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-120-999-5222 2.96 234.08 46891 12/11/97 001214 MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO SOUND SYS. FOR HOLIDAY PARADE 190-183-999-5370 1,300.00 1,300.00 46892 12/11/97 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM W-2 FORMS FOR 1997 TAX REPORT 001-140-999-5222 83.14 46892 12/11/97 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM ENVELOPES FOR W-2 FORMS 001-140-999-5222 47.95 46892 12/11/97 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 4 PART 1099 FORMS 001-140-999-5222 45.51 46892 12/11/97 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 5.61 46892 12/11/97 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 13.69 195.90 46893 12/11/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 90.38 46893 12/11/97 002105 OLD TC~dN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-165-999-5214 160.02 46893 12/11/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-604-5214 36.38 286.78 46894 12/11/97 002652 OSCAR'S LUNCHEON:TEAM CALIF SEMINAR 280-199-999-5264 312.69 312.69 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-162-999-5238 123.18 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-100-999-5238 25.00 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 320-199-999-5238 42.45 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-163-999-5238 25.00 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-164-601-5238 25.00 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-165-999-5238 25.00 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET HNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-164-604-5238 12.50 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-170-999-5238 52.50 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 162.50 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-120-999-5238 27.00 VOUCHREZ 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET 46895 12/11/97 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAG]NG SERV & RENTAL MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-110-999-5238 001-140-999-5238 54.00 25.00 599.13 46896 12/11/97 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. REIMB:"RGHT FIT" GOLFERS 11/15 280-199'999'5270 57.78 57.78 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46897 12/11/97 000246 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 46898 12/11/97 000245 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PEAS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2130 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 000246 PERS RET 190-2130 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 000246 PEAS RET 191-2390 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 000246 PEAS RET 193-2390 000246 PEAS RET 194-2390 000246 PEAS RET 280-2130 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 10.70 20,360.40 790.85 3.34 3,806.42 13.17 32.41 394.89 195.19 1.00 911.68 131.85 650.10 129.58 480.28 313.17 74.97 1.75 14.78 .04 .15 1.54 .84 2.43 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 156.86 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 168.60 000245 AETNA S0 280-2090 56.19 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 697.00 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 356.85 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 972.21 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.25 000245 FHP 001-2090 1,161.38 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 5,255.53 000245 HELTHNET 165-2090 45.10 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 1,309.39 000245 HELTHNET 191-2090 14.85 000245 HELTHNET 192-2090 29.62 000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 207.22 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 44.31 000245 HELTHNET 280-2090 142.86 000245 HELTHNET 330-2090 148.00 28,326.96 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46898 12/11/97 46899 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 46900 12/11/97 VENDOR NUMBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 001958 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 VENDOR NAME PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISERSO 000245 KAISERSO 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS DED 000245 PERS-ADM 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETNA SO 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 FHP 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 HELTHNET 000245 KAISERSO 000245 PACIFICR 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS REV 001958 PERS L-T PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 194-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165-2090 280-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2122 190-180-999-5220 001-150-999-5265 190-183-999-5370 001-162-999-5261 001-100-999-5260 001-164-601-5250 001-164-601-5242 280-199-999-5270 001-120-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 190-180-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 001-140-999-5260 001-110-999-5278 001-110-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 ITEM AMOUNT 760.21 2,085.73 147.92 2,533.58 305.70 101.90 2,317.98 179.04 680.93 102.02 136.51 45.50 37.15 15.48 87.27 1.07 52.21 3.37 9.39 11.85 100.15 52.02 128.96 680.93- 49.85 7.53 6.40 30.30 50.00 24.25 8.36 10.47 21.54 6.44 25.80 32.33 21.82 27.55 12.67 11.00 49.24 12.86 11.98 30.35 23.68 38.97 8.56 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 20,019.23 49.85 472.10 46901 12/11/97 000580 PHOTO kq3RKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-165-999-5250 43.12 VOUCHRE2 12/11)'97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46901 12/11/97 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-161-999-5250 46901 12/11/97 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 20.30 127.07 190.49 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0221 001-120-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0170 001-120-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0368 001-161-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA96-0345 001-161-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0348 001-161-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0237 001-161-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0383 001-161-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PENTIUM 001-120-999-5256 46902 12/11/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0221 001-120-999-5256 10.25 18.25 17.00 18.50 18.00 17.25 16.75 11.25 7.25 134.50 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 001-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL~ INC. 001537 DENTALPM 165-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 190-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 280-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 300-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPM 340-2340 46903 12/11/97 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. COBRA/DEC PARKS/FLAMMER 001-1180 2,187.69 126.60 322.12 178.05 16.92 135.40 51.32 3,018.10 46904 12/11/97 RAINBOW CANYON VILLAGES REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 46905 12/11/97 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 36" BOND PAPER FOR ENG. COPIER 330-199-999-5220 156.17 156.17 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 46906 12/11/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING METER 001-164-601-5250 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 01-02-98000-0 PRKVW FIRESTATIO 001-171-999-5240 01-02-98010-0 PAUBA ROAD VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS gATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS gATER METERS 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 247.91 33.68 24.57 10.31 210.48 3,405.41 98.56 526.61 171.22 160.84 2,315.08 412.26 7,616.93 46907 12/11/97 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 46907 12/11/97 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 46907 12/11/97 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 46907 12/11/97 000907 RANCHO CAR gASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-162-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 20.00 5.00 15.00 5.00 45.00 46908 12/11/97 000352 RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR ASSESSOR MAP COPIES 190-180-999-5220 2.50 2.50 46909 12/11/97 000268 46910 12/11/97 000271 46911 12/11/97 000815 46911 12/11/97 000815 RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & ROWLEY, CATHERINE ROWLEY, CATHERINE OCTOBER 1997 K-RAT FEES OCT DESIGN SERV:WINCH:PW97-21 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 001-2300 210-165-686-5802 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 8,320.00 2,010.73 120.00 120.00 8,320.00 2,010.73 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 11 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46911 12/11/97 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 300.00 540.00 46912 12/11/97 003022 SAN DIEGO FLORIST SUPPL TREE LIGHTS:OLD TWN HOLIDAY 46912 12/11/97 003022 SAN DIEGO FLORIST SUPPL SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 280-199-999-5362 288.80 22.38 311.18 46913 12/11/97 SAVE WALKER BASIN REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 46914 12/11/97 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINTENANCE - TEMECULA 190-180-999-5212 171.65 171.65 46915 12/11/97 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY AIR QUALITY PERMIT:EMERG GENER 190-180-999-5250 171.90 171.90 46916 12/11/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CRC 46916 12/11/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SERVICES - TCC 190-182-999-5250 190-184-999-5250 42.00 36.00 78.00 46917 12/11/97 46917 12/11/97 46917 12/11/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS METERS 2-00-397-5042 BUSINESS PRK 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 340-199-701-5240 193-180-999-5240 4,663.81 4,060.29 895.58 9,619.68 46918 12/11/97 SUNSHINE ART STUDIOS, I ENVELOPE PRINTING SERVICES 001-162-999-5222 9.00 9.00 46919 12/11/97 TAIT, KYRIAKI REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 165-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 280-2125 46920 12/11/97 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 594.17 2.46 92.58 1.02 2.05 14.36 3.07 7.79 20.50 7'58.00 46921 12/11/97 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 108.83 108.83 46922 12/11/97 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIGATION/MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 190-180-999-5212 112.35 112.35 46923 12/11/97 46923 12/11/97 46923 12/11/97 46923 12/11/97 46923 12/11/97 46923 12/11/97 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 000642 TEMECULA~ CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 000642 TEMECULA~ CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 4,455.95 391.25 476.66 568.75 9.99 200.00 6,102.60 46924 12/11/97 002104 TEMEKU GOLF COURSE CART FEES:MRKT ADVERTISEMENT 280-199-999-5270 160.00 160.00 46925 12/11/97 THE WAXMAN 1 REFUND: FORFEIT FEES 190-183-4994 40.00 40.00 46926 12/11/97 002111 TOGO~S TEAM BUILDING MTG:12/10/97 001-162-999-5261 82.35 82.35 46927 12/11/97 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE 18" CONES 46927 12/11/97 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE VEST W/REFLECTORS (CLOTH) 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 212.50 74.75 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGIGTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 12 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46927 12/11/97 46927 12/11/97 46927 12/11/97 003031 003031 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE VEST W/REFLECTOR (MESH) VEST W/REFLECTORS (CLOTH) SALES TAX 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 59.50 58.35 31.40 436.50 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 46928 12/11/97 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 002107 TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TILRNS-GENERAL LIFE INS. TRANS-GENERAL LIFE INS. 002107 VL ADVAN 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VL REVER 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 001-2510 165-2510 190-2510 280-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 165-2510 190-2510 280-2510 340-Z510 223.25 168.40 5.50 39.85 5.50 4.00 223.25- 168.40 5.49 39.85 5.51 4.00 446.50 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 46929 12/11/97 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO CDEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COHP DEF COHP DEF COMP DEF COMP DEF COHP DEF COHP DEF COHP DEF COMP DEF COHP DEF COHP 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 3,469.78 181.48 1,509.79 .75 19.37 85.62 348.18 59.58 562.50 129.63 6,366.68 46930 12/11/97 46930 12/11/97 46930 12/11/97 46930 12/11/97 46930 12/11/97 46930 12/11/97 46931 12/11/97 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 002396 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) U S LONG DISTANCE, INC. 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 340-2160 320-199-999-5208 569.80 127.26 685.86 4.24 53.30 41.04 1,138.92 1,481.50 1,138.92 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF~ N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995902 JS 5305001995860 KL 5305001995894 RR 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995985 GY 5305001995910 RB 5305001995910 RB 5305001995944 TE 5305001995977 JK 5305001995951 SN 5305001995928 MJM 5305001995928 MdM 5305001995928 MJM 001-100-999-5258 001-1170 001-100-999-5258 001-110-999-5263 001-150-999-5260 001-101-999-5280 001-110-999-5263 001-110-999-5258 001-162-999-5260 001-164-604-5260 190-180-999-5260 280-199-999-5260 280-1990 280-199-999-5362 220.00 12.49 220.00 9.45 29.58 48.48 57.87 225.12 21.21 49.00 12.60 33.48 52.00 44.60 VOUCHRE2 12/11/97 09:31 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46932 12/11/97 46933 12/11/97 46933 12/11/97 46933 12/11/97 46934 12/11/97 46934 12/11/97 46934 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46935 12/11/97 46936 12/11/97 46937 12/11/97 46938 12/11/97 46939 12/11/97 VENDOR NUMBER 0O2621 002621 002621 002621 003051 003051 003051 000325 000325 000325 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 001342 002482 000345 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995928 MJM 5305001995928 MJM 5305001995928 MJM 5305001995928 MJM UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS U.P.M.WINER MIX/AC FOR POTHOLE FREIGHT SALES TAX UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE CART CTNR - T20 ARCHIVAL DATA STORAGE MICROBOX ARCHIVAL APERTURE CARD BOX ARCHIVAL LEASED CTNR/INSERT CONT. 604 LEASED CTNR/MICROBOX 648 APERTURE CARD BOX 686 SPECIAL REQUEST:P/U ~ VAULT FREIGHT WAKOSKI, NOELLE REFUND: PARK RENTAL WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC WORLD ECONOMIC DEV. ALL AD:AUGUST '97 OUTLOOK CALIF XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 0CT:5765 COLOR COPIER USAGE ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5258 280-199-999-5270 280-199-999-5228 280-1990 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 190-183-4988 190-184-999-5212 280-199-999-5270 330-199-999-5239 ITEM AMOUNT 1,754.18 22.62 198.15 76.85 761.60 50.00 62.90 97.00 5.00 17.00 416.52 15.48 38.70 48.00 8.00 20.00 12.60 6.00 30.00 15.77 1,950.00 469.37 PAGE 13 CHECK AMOUNT 3,087.68 874.50 119.00 565.30 30.00 15.77 1,950.00 469.37 TOTAL CHECKS 315,204.75 VOUCHREZ 12/18/97 10:56 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 12 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOla/MO0 SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 390 TCSO OEBT SERVICE AMOUNT 127,57'5.25 5,001.70 67,313.56 14,766.63 23,885.21 27,125.45 1,520.00 62,622.69 21,955.94 11,352.52 8,410.76 99.00 7,983.88 1,262.48 TOTAL 380,87'3.05 VOUCHRE2 12/18/97 10:56 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 46941 12/11/97 003066 ALTERNATIVES TO DOMEST! COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING 97/98 001-101-999-5267 4,000.00 4,000.00 46942 12/11/97 001445 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING 97/98 001-101-999-5267 5,000.00 5,000.00 46945 12/18/97 002999 A BASKET FULL MARKETING/PROMO ITEMS - RDA 280-199-999-5270 56.57 56.57 46946 12/18/97 002278 ABC SEWING & VACUUM PARTS/SVC-FACILITY MAINT.EQUIP 190-180-999-5215 32.26 32.26 46947 12/18/97 001538 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA NOV PROF SVC-AREAWIDE TRAF.SIG 210-165-640-5802 3,390.00 3,390.00 46948 12/18/97 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 100.11 46948 12/18/97 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 96.55 196.66 46949 12/18/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/29/97 GROVES 001-161-999-5118 108.36 46949 12/18/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 11/29/97 STEWARD 001-110-999-5118 300.96 409.32 46950 12/18/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CITY HALL HVAC IMPROVEMENT 340-199-701-5610 5,350.25 46950 12/18/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES-PARKS 190-180-999-5212 56.70 46950 12/18/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER INSTALL LIGHTING-O.T.XMAS TREE 280-199-999-5362 3,950.00 46950 12/18/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CITY HALL ELECTRICAL INSTALL. 340-199-701-5250 395.00 46950 12/18/97 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CITY HALL ELECTRICAL INSTALL. 340-199-701-5250 185.00 9,936.95 46951 12/18/97 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES DEC RESTROOM MAINT-BUTTERFIELD 280-199-999-5212 826.00 826.00 46952 12/18/97 000154 C S M F 0 MB:G.ROBERTS:1/1/98-12/31/98 001-140-999-5226 100.00 100.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 190-180-999-5415 17,250.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 190-181-999-5415 246.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 190-182-999-5415 1,593.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 190-184-999-5415 325.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415 987.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LCSC MAINT-PARKS/MEDIANS 193-180-999-5415 11,521.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LDSC MAINT/CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 496.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA NOV LDSC MAINT-C.HALL/FIRE #84 340-199-701-5415 83.56 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA NOV LDSC MAINT-C.HALL/FIRE #84 001-171-999-5215 42.11 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA NOV LDSC MAINT-FIRE STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 124.33 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA LDSC MAINTENANCE-COUNTRY GLENN 193-180-999-5212 477.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC MAINTENANCE/COUNTRY GLENN 193-180-999-5415 47.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSC MAINT-VINTAGE HILLS 193-180-999-5212 266.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA LDSC MAINT-R.HIGHLANDS/YNEZ RD 193-180-999-5212 598.00 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CREDIT:SUBSTANDARD SERVICES 190-180-999-5415 302.00- 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CREDIT:SUBSTANDARD SERVICES 191-180-999-5415 16.04- 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CREDIT:SUBSTANDARD SERVICES 193-180-999-5415 16.22- 46953 12/18/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CREDIT:SUBSTANDARD SERVICES 001-171-999-5212 5.00- 33,716.74 46954 12/18/97 002803 CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP OCT PROF SVC-OVERLAND DR/I-15 001-1280 152.48 46954 12/18/97 002803 CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP OCT PROF SVC-RANCHO CA RD/I-15 001-1280 120.00 272.48 46955 12/18/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER MISC. SIGNS & SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5244 1,098.75 46955 12/18/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER BARRICADE LIGHTS 001-164-601-5244 511.04 46955 12/18/97 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS-WALCOTT CORRIDOR 210-165-637-5804 172.40 1,782.19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 46956 12/18/97 001195 46956 12/18/97 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC DEC ALARM MONITORING SVC-CRC CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC DEC ALARM MONITORING SERVICES 46957 12/18/97 001249 CENTRE FOR ORG. EFFECTI 46958 12/18/97 46959 12/18/97 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 CONSULTING SVC-KEREN STASHOWER 001-150-999-5248 CIRCLE CITY ROOFING INC REFUND:BUS.NOT HOME OCCUPATION REFUND: CAMPAIGN STATEMENT COMERCHERO, JEFF 46960 12/18/97 002147 COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS ENTERTAINMENT FOR OLD TOWN COMPUSERVE, INC. COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUSERVE INFORMATION SERVICE QTRLY ALARM MONITORING SERVICE ALARM MONITORING SVC-NAINT.FAC ALARM MONITORING SERVICE - TCC COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. QTRLY TRAFFIC COUNT CENSUS PRG CRAFTERS VILLAGE, THE SUPPLIES/XMAS CARDS-O.T.PROMO CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC CREATIVE HYDROSEED, INC HYDROSEED VARIOUS LOCATIONS HYDROSEED VARIOUS LOCATIONS HYDROSEED VARIOUS LOCATIONS HYDROSEED VARIOUS LOCATIONS HYDROSEED VARIOUS LOCATIONS HYDROSEED - TRADESWINDS SLOPES 46961 12/18/97 001275 46962 12/18/97 000442 46962 12/18/97 000442 46962 12/18/97 000442 46963 12/18/97 002631 46964 12/18/97 003061 46965 12/18/97 001629 46965 12/18/97 001629 46965 12/18/97 001629 46965 12/18/97 001629 46965 12/18/97 001629 46965 12/18/97 001629 002900 DANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON OCT PROF SVCS-YNEZ/WINCHESTER 46966 12/18/97 46967 12/18/97 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS POLICE K-9 MEDICAL TREATMENT REFUND: CANCELLED CLASS REFUND: CANCELLED CLASS TEMP HELP W/E 11/21/97 DONAHOE TEMP HELP W/E 11/28/97 J.DIAZ EASEMENT PROCESS FEE OVRLND EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIEGO DR LDSC WATER SERVICE ELIZABETH HOSPICE 97-98 COMM SERV FUNDING AWARD NOV PROF SVCS-GABRIEL PROPERTY NOV SVCS-MASON/MASHBURN PROP. 46968 12/18/97 DRINK~/ARD, VERON]CA 46968 12/18/97 DRINKWARD, VERON]CA 46969 12/18/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 46969 12/18/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 46970 12/18/97 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 46971 12/18/97 002390 46972 12/18/97 002079 469T~ 12/18/97 002802 ELLIS GROUP, INC. 46973 12/18/97 002802 ELLIS GROUP, INC. 46974 46975 46975 001-199-4056 001-2675 280-199-999-5362 320-199-999-5228 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-184-999-5250 001-164-602-5406 280-199-999-5362 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 210-165-683-5802 001-170-999-5327 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 001-161-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-1280 193-180-999-5240 001-101-999-5267 001-130-999-5250 001-130-999-5250 12/18/97 002326 ESCROW FUNDING SERVICES RELEASE STOP NOTICE:EXCELL REN 210-2038 12/18/97 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION OCT PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 12/18/97 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION NOVEMBER PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 50.00 45.00 1,285.76 20.00 69.98 450.00 9.95 210.00 135.00 210.00 140.00 150.00 385.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 660.00 385.00 458.90 47,590.30 36.49 40.00 29.00 2,912.80 159.04 300.00 97.28 2,500.00 300.00 1,400.00 5,788.97 7,679.23 1,450.48 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 95.00 1,285.76 20.00 69.98 450.00 9.95 555.00 140.00 150.00 4,388.90 47,590.30 36.49 69.00 3,071.84 300.00 97.28 2,500.00 1,700.00 5,788.97 9,129.71 VOUCHRE2 12/18/97 10:56 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 46976 12/18/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 46976 12/18/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 46976 12/18/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 46976 12/18/97 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE - PARKS NOV LDSC MAINTENANCE - SLOPES REPAIRED DRAIN LINE/SAM HICKS TREE REMOVAL - WOODCREST 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 8,961.00 8,813.00 80.61 90.00 17,944.61 46977 12/18/97 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER 46977 12/18/97 001701 EXCEL RENTAL CENTER LIGHT TOWERS/FUEL-XMAS PARADE 190-183-999-5370 FREIGHT 190-183-999-5370 2,147.75 352.28 2,500.03 46978 12/18/97 FARRA, JEANINE REFUND: CANCELLED CLASS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 46979 12/18/97 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 32.50 40.60 8.00 7.00 8.00 26.20 8.00 130.30 46980 12/18/97 000170 46980 12/18/97 000170 46980 12/18/97 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, VARIOUS CALENDAR AND BINDER FREIGHT SALES TAX 001-171-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 480.95 9.67 38.02 528.64 46981 12/18/97 001103 46981 12/18/97 001103 46981 12/18/97 001103 46981 12/18/97 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS FREEDOM MATERIALS FREEDOM MATERIALS FREEDOM MATERIALS SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL SAND FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 77.58 77.58 77.58 75.43 308.17 46982 12/18/97 000184 46982 12/18/97 000184 46982 12/18/97 000184 46982 12/18/97 000184 46982 12/18/97 000184 46982 12/18/97 000184 46983 12/18/97 001355 46983 12/18/97 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. 909 197-5072:GENERAL USAGE 909 506-1941:PTA CD TTACSD 909 699-0590:ALARM LINES PTA 909 699-1370/SVC FOR COP/NOV 909 699-2811:GENERAL USAGE 909 699-8632:GENERAL USAGE NOV ACCESS OPEN LINE CITY/CRC NOV ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-110-999-5223 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 2,722.16 55.34 54.54 139.89 1,182.35 27.49 350.00 315.00 4,181.77 665.00 46984 12/18/97 001937 GALLS, INC. 46984 12/18/97 001937 GALLS, INC. 46984 12/18/97 001937 GALLS, INC. 46984 12/18/97 001937 GALLS, INC. CELL PHONE CASES FOR PW DEPT. CELL PHONE CASES FOR PN DEPT. FREIGHT FREIGHT 001-163-999-5242 001-164-604-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-164-604-5242 19.49 58.45 2.00 5.99 85.93 46985 12/18/97 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 100.00 46986 12/18/97 GILLEN, JEANNIE REFUND: CAMPAIGN STATEMENT 001-2675 75.04 75.04 46987 12/18/97 000177 46987 12/18/97 000177 46987 12/18/97 000177 46987 12/18/97 000177 46987 12/18/97 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNlEg OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE SUPPLIES FOR SKATE PARK 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-183-999-5305 51.42 339.57 94.42 154.39 12.13 VOUCHRE2 12/18/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 46987 46987 46987 46987 46987 46987 46987 46987 46988 46989 46989 46989 46989 46989 46989 46990 47003 47O04 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47005 47006 47006 10:56 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18197 12/18/97 12118/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18197 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES - TCSD 190-180-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES TCSD/CITY HALL 190-180-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR RDA DEPT 280-199-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR RDA DEPT. 165-199-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR ROA 280-199-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR RDA 165-199-999-5220 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS CAIRNS-IRIS KCBS VIDEO DUBS 280-199-999-5270 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 002372 HARMON, JUDY MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5242 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5214 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 35.60 430.98 984.43 30.30 30.29 125.54 125.53 41.32 87.50 34.97 54.50 232.60 30.13 29.05 231.55 TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330 351.20 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE NOV EAP PROGRAM FEE 001-150-999-5250 HEMET/TEMECULA E A C MEMBERSHIP:D.LANIER/J.BALLANCE 001-150-999-5226 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES MOTORCYCLE PARTS FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5214 002207 HTE PROGRAMMED FOR SUCC ANNUAL MAINT ACTIVITY REGIST. 320-199-999-5211 002207 HTE PROGRAMMED FOR SUCC SALES TAX FOR INVOICE #516619 320-199-999-5211 47007 12/18/97 000~3 I P M A 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 47008 12/18/97 47009 MB:G.YATES:2/1/98-1/31/99 001-150-999-5226 002464 IKON CAPITAL QTRLY LEASE AGREEMENT - COPIER 001-171-999-5239 002704 INTERNATIONAL FOOD, WIN MB:G.WOLNICK:1/1/98-12/31/98 280-199-999-5226 IVERSON, LISA REFUND: UNABLE TO ATTEND CLASS 190-183-4982 000594 K R T M FM RADIO LIVE REMOTE RADIO ANNOUNCEMENT 280-199-999-5362 001~7 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP:B.ORTEGA:WE 11/30/97 001-110-999-5118 47010 47011 12/18/97 4701 Z 379.85 20.00 10.88 4.06 8.75 51.57 7'51.26 134.78 162.45 107.57 147.14 65.15 433.20 4.48 1,320.00 105.60 222.00 526.41 134.00 75.0o 500.00 292.50 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 2,455.92 87.50 612.80 351.20 379.85 20.00 1,861.29 1,425.60 222.00 526.41 134.00 75. O0 500.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47012 12/18/97 001667 KELLY TEMPOILRRY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 11/30/97 N.MILES 001-163-999-5118 47012 12/18/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 11/30/97 N.MILES 001-164-604-5118 54.60 163.80 510.90 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 47013 12/18/97 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/05/97 SIMMONS 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/05/97 SIMMONS 280-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/19/97 SIMMONS 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/19/97 SIMMONS 280-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/26/97 SIMMONS 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 10/26/97 SIMMONS 280-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 11/02/97 SIMMONS 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP W/E 11/02/97 SIMMONS 280-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 11/09/97 PETERSON 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 11/09/97 PETERSON 280-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 11/02/97 PETERSON 165-199-999-5118 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 11/02/97 PETERSON 280-199-999-5118 TEMP HELP W/E 11/09/97 TIBBETS 165-199-999-5118 TEMP HELP W/E 11/09/97 TIBBETS 280-199-999-5118 TEMP HELP WE 11/16/97 PETERSON TEMP HELP WE 11/16/97 PETERSON TEMP HELP WE 11/23/97 PETERSON TEMP HELP WE 11/23/97 PETERSON TEMP HELP W/E 11/30/97 MACIAS TEMP HELP W/E 11/30/97 MACIAS 165-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 165-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 165-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 175.50 175.50 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 31.20 31.20 44.20 44.20 39.00 39.00 44.20 44.20 132.60 132.60 160.88 160.87 1,567.15 47014 12/18/97 000206 KINKO'S, INC. MISC COPYING NEEDS - TCSD 190-180-999-5222 8.79 47015 12/18/97 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MAINT. SUPPLIES/EQUIP. REPAIR 190-180-999-5212 47015 12/18/97 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/PW CREW 001-164-601-5218 133.91 20.44 154.35 47016 12/18/97 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERV! PRKG LOT LIGHTING REPAIR/SVCS 190-180-999-5212 620.00 620.00 47017 12/18/97 002187 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR NOV ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 001-172-999-5255 47018 12/18/97 002933 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP OCT PROF SVC-PALA/RAINBOW CYN 210-165-689-5802 47018 12/18/97 002933 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP NOV PROF SVC-PAUBA/STATION ~ 210-165-692-5802 47018 12/18/97 002933 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP NOV PROF SVC-PALA/RAINBOW CYN 210-165-689-5802 LOHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 47019 12/18/97 002985 47019 12/18/97 002983 47019 12/18/97 002983 47019 12/18/97 002985 CONSULT SVCS - PECHANGA CREEK 001-164-601-5403 FLOOD CONTROL PALA RD/PECHANGA 001-164-601-5403 CREDIT: TOTAL EXCEEDS CONTRACT 001-164-601-5403 CREDIT: TOTAL EXCEEDS CONTRACT 001-164-601-5403 2,001.10 2,039.02 1,032.00 1,032.00 492.50 4,653.97 479.04- 153.97- 2,001.10 4,103.02 4,513.46 47020 12/18/97 002229 LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I NOVEMBER PRESS CLIPPINGS 280-199-999-5250 157.08 157.08 47021 12/18/97 002632 MAIL BOXES ETC. NOV DAILY MAIL DELIVERY SERVS 330-199-999-5250 99.00 99.00 47022 12/18/97 MATILLA, ROBERT REFUND:2-BEGINNING TUMBLERS 190-183-4982 80.00 80.00 47023 12/18/97 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 235.20 235.20 47024 12/18/97 003045 MICHAELS, DUANE FIDDLER PERFORMANCE - OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 300.00 300.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER 47025 12/18/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT (3) 6~MB MEMORY EXPANSION KIT 320-199-999-5221 47025 12/18/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 47025 12/18/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 47026 12/18/97 003050 MICROHOUSE 47026 12/18/97 003050 MICROHOUSE IMAGECAST/TECHNICIAN LICENSE 320-199-999-5221 FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 47027 12/18/97 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM JAN LEASE FOR MINOLTA COPIER 47027 12/18/97 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM SALES TAX 190-182-999-5239 190-182-999-5239 47028 12/18/97 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS 47028 12/18/97 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS FOIL BUSINESS CARDS:W.PATTISON 001-140-999-5222 SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 47029 12/18/97 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERG DIRT ROAD GRADING 195-180-999-5402 47030 12/18/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC. MASTER/DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD 001-120-999-5277 47030 12/18/97 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMSw INC. MASTER/DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD 001-120-999-52~r7 47031 12/18/97 001214 MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO RENT AUDIO SYSTEM FOR OLD TWN 280-199-999-5362 47032 12/18/97 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES 390'199-999-5248 47033 12/18/97 MURG, CHERYL REFUND: 2 DAY ART CAMP 190-183-4982 47034 12/18/97 NAGGARw MICHAEL REFD:CAMPAIGN STATEMNT DEPOSIT 001-2675 47035 12/18/97 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS/SUPPLIES PW MAINT 001-164-601-5218 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT 47036 12/18/97 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES -AT AD FOR CSD COMMISSION OPENING AD:NOV CONSTRUCTION UPDATES AD=8pg COLOR AD FOR OLD TWN AD=HOLIDAY EVENTS AD=HOLIDAY EVENTS AD:LIBRARY DESIGN SERVICES 001-120-999-5256 001-165-999-5256 280-199-999-5362 190-180-999-5254 190-180-999-5254 001-120-999-5256 47037 12/18/97 002100 OBJECT RADIANCE, INC. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 47038 12/18/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 47038 12/18/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 001-164-601-5214 47039 12/18/97 002496 ONE ON ONE COMPUTER TRA SUBSCRIPT:WRK SMARTER W/WRDPRT 001-120-999-5228 47039 12/18/97 002496 ONE ON ONE COMPUTER TRA FREIGHT 001-120-999-5228 47040 12/18/97 002652 OSCAR'S CATERING SERV:COUNCIL MTG 12/9 001-100-999-5260 47041 12/18/97 003003 OMENS, JEFF SAND FOR PUBLIC SAND BAGS 001-16~-601-5401 47042 12/18/97 000667 P A P A QAC WKSHP:K.HARRINGTON:2/5/98 190-180-999-5261 47043 12/18/97 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. NOV RDA CONSULTING SERVICES 47043 12/18/97 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. NOV RDA CONSULTING SERVICES 165-199-999-5248 280-199-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 1,440.00 5.00 111.60 595.00 9.00 151.00 11.70 102.50 7.94 1,520.00 29.84 29.94 3,200.00 1,262.48 40.00 75.04 5.92 80.50 169.06 5,387.69 176.60 89.67 63.50 695.52 114.27 208.05 173.68 26.05 91.88 161.63 45.00 288.54 218.68 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1,556.60 604.00 162.70 110.44 1,520.00 59.78 3,200.00 1,262.48 40.00 75.04 5.92 5,967.02 695.52 322.32 199.73 91.88 161.63 45.00 VOUCHREZ 12/18/97 10:56 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 7 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47043 12/18/97 001383 47043 12/18/97 001383 47043 12/18/97 001383 47043 12/18/97 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. P M U ASSOCIATES, INC. P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. NOV RDA CONSULTANT SERVICES OCT RDA CONSULTING SERVICES OCT RDA CONSULTANT SERVICES OCT RDA CONSULTANT SERVICES 001-2640 165-199-999-5248 280-199-999-5248 001-2640 472.50 2,709.26 903.09 2,283.75 6,875.82 47044 12/18/97 PABST, MARY REFUND:DUPLICATE PLUMBING PRMT 001-162-4285 30.00 30.00 47045 12/18/97 002800 47045 12/18/97 002800 47045 12/18/97 002800 47045 12/18/97 002800 47045 12/18/97 002800 PACIFIC STRIPING, INC PACIFIC STRIPING, INC PACIFIC STRIPING, INC PACIFIC STRIPING, INC PACIFIC STRIPING, INC STREET STRIPING PRGM:PW97-01 STREET STRIPING PRGM:PW97-01 STREET STRIPING PRGM:PW97-01 STREET STRIPING PRGM:PW97-01 RESTRIPING:PALA RD/HAZIT DE PO 001-164-601-5410 001-164-602-5410 001-164-601-5410 001-164-602-5410 001-164-602-5410 15,990.57 1,776.73 6,901.65 766.85 4,500.00 29,935.80 47046 12/18/97 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 228.00 228.00 47047 12/18/97 000247 PESTMASTER 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH 47048 12/18/97 000249 PETTY CASH REMOVE TRASH FOR LONG VLY WASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5415 190-183-999-5320 001-150-999-5265 190-183-999-5320 001-150-999-5260 280-199-999-5220 190-181-999-5301 001-150-999-5265 280-199-999-5270 001-162-999-5220 280-199-999-5260 001-140-999-5260 001-161-999-5263 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5310 001-164-601-5250 9,995.00 30.04 5.07 22.02 43.00 6.80 14.36 31.81 85.00 7.25 11.86 2.00 5.00 14.02 7.89 48.52 9,995.00 334.64 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 47049 12/18/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN AD:HALLOWEEN SPOOKTACULAR 190-180-999-5254 AD:COMMUNITY SERV FUNDING 001-140-999-5254 AD:ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION UPDATE 001-165-999-5256 AD:REGISTER TO VOTE 001-120-999-5256 AD:DRUG FREE TEMECULA 001-101-999-5285 PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0392 001-161-999-5256 PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0158 001-161-999-5256 145.50 90.00 100.00 102.00 30.00 21.75 18.00 507.25 47050 12/18/97 002110 47050 12/18/97 002110 47050 12/18/97 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT PRIME EQUIPMENT PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 147.19 67.12 28.26 242.57 47051 12/18/97 002776 47051 12/18/97 002776 47051 12/18/97 002776 47051 12/18/97 002776 47051 12/18/97 002776 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. PRIME MATRIX, INC. PRIME MATRIX, INC. PRIME MATRIX, INC. PRIME MATRIX, INC. PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001317-6 JS SC-5001339-0 KL SC-5002361-3 PB SC-5001383-8 RR SC-5001322-6 RB SC-5001391-1 GR 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-140-999-5208 159.09 148.32 36.58 53.69 30.82 39.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001343-2 GY 001-150-999-5208 21.08 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001379-6 dH 001-163-999-5208 117.34 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001278-0 SM 001-163-999-5208 72.14 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001237-6 PW POOL 001-16~-604-5208 11.26 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001251-7 KH 190-180-999-5208 38.59 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001348-1 MW 190-180-999-5208 55.69 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001349-9 TCSO POOL 190-180-999-5208 37.90 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001367-1 SN 190-180-999-5208 75.65 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001377-0 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 42.47 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 27.72 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001218-6 MdM 280-199-999-5208 48.71 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003948-6 INFOR SYSTEM 320-199-999-5208 27.72 47051 12/18/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002401-7 TH 320-199-999-5208 38.69 47052 12/18/97 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE EQUIP RENTAL:OLD TWN X-HAS PRO 280-199-999-5362 767.72 1,082.88 767.72 47053 12/18/97 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST PLAN CK WTR LINE:MARG COMM PRK 210-190-119-5802 1,500.00 1,500.00 47054 12/18/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-17-80000-1 VIA EDUARDO 001-164-601-5250 24.73 47054 12/18/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL STREET 280-199-807-5804 42.03 47054 12/18/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 383.71 47054 12/18/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 84.54 47054 12/18/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 843.47 47055 12/18/97 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-161-999-5214 5.00 47055 12/18/97 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-161-999-5263 13.00 1,378.48 18.00 47056 12/18/97 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC. ADS FOR COMMISSION OPENINGS 001-120-999-5228 105.00 47056 12/18/97 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC. AD:CHRISTMAS PROMO OLD TWN 280-199-999-5362 402.12 507.12 47057 12/18/97 002400 REBEL TEMECULA EQUIPMENT RENTALS:PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 35.00 35.00 47058 12/18/97 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET NOV 97 PROF LEGAL SERVS 001-130-999-5247 52.50 52.50 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 6,837.90 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 836.75 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 8,081.15 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHAROS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 190-180-999-5246 220.75 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHAROS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 115.50 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 573.58 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 17.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 2,124.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHAROS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 104.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2640 1,065.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-1270 159.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 4,180.83 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 68.61 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 1,937.25 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 234.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 727.00 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 34.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHAROS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 280-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 165-199-999-5246 47059 12/18/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS OCTOBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2640 310.25 1,491.75 147.83 411.00 505.00 2,417.25 582.00 28.00 143.25 33,352.65 47060 12/18/97 000266 RIGHTWAY 47060 12/18/97 000266 RIGHTWAY 47061 12/18/97 003072 RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRI PORTABLE TOILETS:ELECT PARADE 190-183-999-5370 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL:RIVERTO 190-180-999-5238 97-98 COMM SERV FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267 1,026.28 62.89 2,000.00 1,089.17 2,000.00 47062 12/18/97 000418 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R ADMIN FEE: EXEMPTION PW97-06 210-165-683-5802 78.00 78.00 47063 12/18/97 001592 RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI EMERG RADIO RENTAL:COOE ENFORC 001-162-999-5238 155.91 155.91 47064 12/18/97 000875 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REFD:CAMPAIGN STATEMNT DEPOSIT 001-2675 63.82 63.82 47065 12/18/97 ROOLER, DOROTHY REFUND: PHOTO CLASS 190-183-4982 18.00 18.00 47066 12/18/97 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 47066 12/18/97 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 47067 12/18/97 003022 SAN DIEGO FLORIST SUPPL WHITE MINI CHRISTMAS LIGHTS 280-199-999-5362 47067 12/18/97 003022 SAN DIEGO FLORIST SUPPL SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 483.00 525.00 530.00 41.08 1,008.00 571.08 47068 12/18/97 002670 SCHNEIDER-LJUBENKOV, JU TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 47068 12/18/97 002670 SCHNEIDER-LdUBENKOV, dU TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 100.80 112.00 212.80 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS FOAM CORE DISPLAY SIGNS:OLD TW 280-199-999-5270 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS OLD TWN MRKT DISPLAY SUPPLIES 280-199-999-5270 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS VINYL BANNER FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS COROPLAST SIGNS FOR OLD TWN 280-199-999-5362 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS VINYL BANNER FOR OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 47069 12/18/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS SALES TAX 280-199-999-5362 66.63 35.04 8~.00 6.51 115.50 8.95 156.00 12.09 484.72 47070 12/18/97 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TREE LIGHTING 280-199-999-5362 261.38 261.38 47071 12/18/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CTRL SERVICES-SR CNTR 190-181-999-5250 47071 12/18/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CTRL SERV-SR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 47071 12/18/97 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL SVS FOR FIRE #~4 001-171-999-5212 29.00 29.00 48.00 106.00 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3030 WINCH TC1 191-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-09-330-3139 WINCH TC1 191-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 190-184-999-5240 185.46 216.24 734.98 611.76 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 12/18/97 10:56 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-00-397-5059 VARIOUS METERS 190-180-999-5240 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA 190-182-999-5240 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS METERS 192-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 191-180-999-5319 47072 12/18/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS 001-171-999-5240 10,154.91 3,072.01 23,885.21 7,542.32 5,032.13 813.97 52,248.99 47073 12/18/97 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 021 725 0775 SR CTR 190-181-999-5240 47073 12/18/97 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 091 024 9300 CRC 190-182-999-5240 47073 12/18/97 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 095 167 7907 PRKVIEW STATION 001-171-999-5240 47073 12/18/97 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 101 525 0950 TCC 190-184-999-5240 47073 12/18/97 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP 133 040 7373 MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5240 129.27 1,922.24 161.92 74.29 46.38 2,334.10 47074 12/18/97 STEWART, LISA REFUND: TWO DAY ART CAMP 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00 47075 12/18/97 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. REFD:CAMPAIGN STATEMNT DEPOSIT 001-2675 73.94 73.94 47076 12/18/97 000305 TARGET STORE 47076 12/18/97 000305 TARGET STORE CANNON SURE SHOT/FILM:LAND DEV 001-164-604-5220 CANNON SURE SHOT/FILM:LAND DEV 001-164-604-5220 67.17 156.73 223.90 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. RIBBONS/PLAQUES:SANTA'S PARADE 190-183-999-5370 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. RIBBONS/PLAQUES=SANTA'S PARADE 190-183-999-5370 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. RIBBONS/PLAQUES:SANTA'S PARADE 190-183-999-5370 47077 12/18/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5370 201.27 15.60 161.60 12.52 339.05 26.28 756.32 47078 12/18/97 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC 98 WRESTLING POSTER SPONSORSHP 001-100-999-5254 185.00 185.00 47079 12/18/97 003074 TEMECULA VALLEY ROSE SO 97-98 COHM SERV FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267 1,250.00 1,250.00 47080 12/18/97 001403 TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER 97-98 COMM SERV FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267 47081 12/18/97 002769 TODD~S FENCING RESIDENTIAL PRGM: RONEY, TOM 165-199-813-5804 47082 12/18/97 001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES MITIGATION PRGM:REGIONAL CTR 001-2620 47082 12/18/97 001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES MITIGATION PRGM:CAMPOS VERDES 001-2610 3,000.00 1,036.50 1,902.50 1,902.50 3,000.00 1,036.50 3,805.00 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995993 JG/LEAGUE OF CIT 001-1170 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5228 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5258 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5261 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5228 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5258 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5258 47083 12/18/97 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5261 47084 12/18/97 003043 UNITED CHURCH OF THE VA CHOIR FOR X-HAS PROHO OLD TWN 280-199-999-5362 195.00 55.00 220.00 125.00 30.98 955.31 31.12 430.00 200.00 2,042.41 200.00 47085 12/18/97 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORMS RENTAL:PW MAINT CREWS 001-164-601-5243 47085 12/18/97 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM RENTAL FOR TCSD MAINT 190-180-999-5243 183.48 108.14 VOUCHRE2 12/18/97 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 47085 47086 47086 47087 47088 47089 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47090 47O90 10:56 CHECK DATE 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 12/18/97 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT 000326 002576 002576 002565 003073 000332 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, URBAN DESIGN STUDIO URBAN DESIGN STUDIO VALENCIA, SHARON VALLEY JUNIOR GOLF ASSO VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 001342 FLOOR HAT RENTAL-CRC 190-180-999-5243 OCT:SOUTHSIDE SPEC PLAN DESIGN 001-161-999-5248 SEPT SERVS:SOUTHSIOE SPEC PLAN 001-161-999-5248 CHORAL BELLES CHRISTMAS CAROLS 280-199-999-5362 97-98 COHM SERV FUNDING AWARD 001-101-999-5267 NOVEMBER 97 PLAN CHECK SERVICE 001-162-999-5248 36~1 EUREKA PORTABLE VACUUM 572885 PAPER FILTER BAGS SALES TAX PLAINT SUPPLIES-MAINT FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC MAINT SUPPLIES-SR CENTER MAINT. SUPPLIES-SR. CENTER CITY HALL SANITARY VACUUM MAGNET BAR 60E EUREKA ATTACHMENT KIT PAPER FILTER BAGS SALES TAX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-702-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-701-5242 190-182-999-5212 32.64 2,570.00 1,666.00 1,200.00 5,000.00 5,675.64 153.20 5.50 12.30 24.78 249.71 102.77 183.88 47.00 316.06 324.49 14.72 21.29 15.00 29.10 40.36 PAGE 11 CHECK AMOUNT 324.26 4,236.00 1,200.00 5,000.00 5,675.64 1,540.16 TOTAL CHECKS 380,873.05 VOUCHREZ 12/24/97 09:41 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV' LC~/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 128,431.08 3,005.53 24,780.04 260.35 66.57 917.68 496.06 3,448.00 7,408.75 16,125.79 7,834.38 2,435.59 5,532.04 1,445.48 TOTAL 202,187.34 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47091 12/18/97 003075 TIPLER, DAN SANTA CLAUS:O.T. HOLIDAY EVENT 280-199-999-5362 150.00 150.00 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 36.81 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 9.83 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 48.97 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD! 280-2070 4.19 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 4.02 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 5,116.50 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 217.40 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 817.94 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 1.64 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 3.95 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 67.62 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 24.97 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 192.54 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 23.56 833769 12/24/97 000444 [NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 144.69 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 24.69 833769 12/24/97 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 98.22 6,837.54 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 20,070.32 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 710.15 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 3,515.48 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 8.94 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 23.16 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 333.31 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 140.28 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 609.04 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 89.94 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 613.59 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 113.51 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 438.98 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 4,314.72 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 185.56 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,006.42 856~67 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 2.38 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 6.17 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 79.09 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 36.58 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 175.12 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 24.20 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 127.12 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 27.86 856867 12/24/97 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 126.98 47094 12/24/97 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SOFTBALL & BASKETBALL AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 974.06 32,778.90 974.06 47095 12/24/97 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SRVCS:WINCH. CRK PARK 210-190-149-5802 220.90 47095 12/24/97 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SRVCS:BASKETBALL COURT 190-180-999-5248 750.00 970.90 47096 12/24/97 003023 AMERICAN RED CROSS ENCLOSED WELLS CARGO TRAILER/ 001-110-999-5278 2,700.00 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09=41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN RED CROSS 47096 12/24/97 003023 47096 12/24/97 003023 24~ E-TRACKING REAR RAMP DOOR 47097 12/24/97 002987 ARMSTRONG DEVELOPMENT S RCSP DESILTING BASIN 47098 12/24/97 003041 47099 12/24/97 47100 12/24/97 001006 002147 12/24/97 002147 BEAR STATE PUMP & EQUIP BRATTON, PAT BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 47101 12/24/97 000901 47102 12/24/97 001260 47103 12/24/97 000154 47104 12/24/97 000126 47105 12/24/97 001717 47106 12/24/97 002803 47107 12/24/97 002534 47107 12/24/97 002534 47108 12/24/97 000137 47109 12/24/97 47110 12/24/97 47110 47111 12/24/97 47111 12/24/97 CPRS CRC POOL MAINTENANCE REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT PRINTER MAINT CONTRACT MEMBERSHIP DUES:L.A. AMAVISCA C P R S CPRS CF: TCSD STAFF CSMFO CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA TRADE AND CO ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-110-999-5278 001-110-999-5278 190-180-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-2900 330-199-999-5217 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-5258 CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP CATERERS CAFE, THE CATERERS CAFE, THE CHEVRON U S A INC. ANNUAL CF:2/22 ROBERTS/MCDERMO 001-140-999-5258 IRRIGATION REPAIRS-SPORTS PARK MEDICAL DESIGN/MANU. TRADESHOW NOV PROF SVCS-RANCHO CA/I-15 REFRESHEMNTS:TREE LIGHTING BREAKFAST WITH SANTA FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES REFUND:MEN~S BASKETBALL LEAGUE COMBS, WALTER COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS COMPLIMENTS, COMPLAINTS CRAIG, HAROLD A. CRAIG, HAROLD A. 47112 47113 47113 47114 47115 47116 12/24/97 000478 FAST SIGNS 47116 12/24/97 000478 FAST SIGNS 47117 12/24/97 003083 FLORES, MELINDA 47118 12/24/97 003082 FOWLER, DEANNA ENTERTAINMENT:BRKFST W/ SANTA ENTERTAINMENT:O.T. FESTIVITIES REFUND:PRKG CIT#11691:PD TWICE REFUND:PRKG CIT#11691:PD TWICE 12/24/97 003080 DARTNELL CORPORATION, T PUBLICATION:FROM 9-5 12/24/97 001393 OATA TICKET, INC. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 12/24/97 001393 OATA TICKET, INC. PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 12/24/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/05/97 J.DIAZ 12/24/97 002060 EUROPEAN DELI& CATERIN REFRESHMENTS COUNCIL MEETINGS SIGNS:ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE SALES TAX FINANCIAL CF EXPENSE 12/11-12 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-180-999-5212 280-199-999-5258 001-1280 280-199-999-5362 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5263 190-183-4994 190-183-999-5370 280-199-999-5362 001-2260 001-170-4055 001-161-999-5228 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-140-999-5118 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-140-999-5Z61 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 100.00 200.00 600.00 2,521.52 100.00 3,115.44 115.00 1,194.00 310.00 328.00 860.00 420.00 667.50 1,020.00 15.68 40.00 225.00 410.00 5.00 55.00 89.97 56.88 56.87 1,598.82 126.61 70.00 5.43 88.06 408.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 3,000.00 600.00 2,521.52 100.00 3,115.44 115.00 1,194.00 310.00 328.00 860.00 420.00 1,687.50 15.68 40.00 635.00 60.00 89.97 113.75 1,598.82 126.61 75.43 88.06 408.00 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09.-41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47119 12/24/97 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 190-2140 129.87 47119 12/24/97 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARO - W 002982 ST DED 280-2140 25.00 154.87 47120 12/24/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-0783:GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 47120 12/24/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-6243:PALA COMM. PARK 320-199-999-5208 73.03 26.83 99.86 47121 12/24/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE MISC. COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5242 47121 12/24/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 47121 12/24/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 187.80 7.22 14.78 209.80 47122 12/24/97 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, JAN-MAR ALARM SRVCS-CABOOSE 001-110-999-5223 47122 12/24/97 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY, ALARM MONITORING SVC-SKATE PRK 190-180-999-5250 75.00 105.00 180.00 47123 12/24/97 000663 I A P M 0 MEMBERSHIP DUES ~98 A. ELMO 001-162-999-5226 250.00 250.00 47124 12/24/97 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,599.36 47124 12/24/97 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.75 47124 12/24/97 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 275.00 47124 12/24/97 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 280-2080 6.25 1,899.36 47125 12/24/97 001351 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC 1998 MEMBERSHIP DUES 280-199-999-5264 10,344.00 10,344.00 47126 12/24/97 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 320.26 320.26 47127 12/24/97 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 80.00 80.00 47128 12/24/97 003065 J A M S/ENDISPUTE NUISANCE ABATEMENT ADM. HEAR. 001-162-999-5440 250.00 47128 12/24/97 003065 d A M S/ENOISPUTE NUISANCE ABATEMENT ADM. HEAR. 001-162-999-5440 250.00 47128 12/24/97 003065 d A M S/ENOISPUTE NUISANCE ABATEMENT ADM. HEAR. 001-162-999-5440 250.00 47128 12/24/97 003065 d A M S/ENDISPUTE NUISANCE ABATEMENT ADM. HEAR. 001-162-999-5440 250.00 47128 12/24/97 003065 d A M S/ENDISPUTE NUISANCE ABATEMENT ADM. HEAR. 001-162-999-5440 250.00 1,250.00 47129 12/24/97 001894 JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY 4 NEW GATES AT SKATE PARK 190-180-999-5212 1,400.00 47129 12/24/97 001894 dOHNSON FENCE COMPANY REINFORCE HOCKEY RINK BOXES 190-180-999-5212 680.00 47130 12/24/97 001420 JOLLY JUMPS BREAKFAST W/ SANTA:JOLLY JUMP 190-183-999-5370 125.00 2,080.00 125.00 47131 12/24/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/07/97 N.MILES 001-163-999-5118 47131 12/24/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 12/07/97 N.MILES 001-164-604-5118 72.80 218.40 291.20 47132 12/24/97 003046 KFROG 95.1 REMOTE SET UP 12/20 OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5362 300.00 300.00 47133 12/24/97 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 12/14/97 J.MACIAS 165-199-999-5118 47133 12/24/97 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SOLUTION TEMP HELP WE 12/14/97 J.MACIAS 280-199-999-5118 156.00 156.00 312.00 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC TEST KITS (WATER QUALITY) 190-183-999-5310 158.00 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC FREIGHT 190-183-999-5310 5.00 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC SALES TAX 190-183-999-5310 12.25 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC CRC POOL MAINTENANCE, SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 32.53 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC CRC POOL MAINTENANCE, SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 235.71 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC. POOL SUPPLIES-CRC POOL 190-182-999-5212 342.00 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 4 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT 47134 12/24/97 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 32.51 818.00 47135 12/24/97 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT. 001-161-999-5214 102.70 102.70 47136 12/24/97 003028 LOS ANGELES TIMES NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 280-199-999-5228 22.40 22.40 47137 12/24/97 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO NOV PROF SVCS-RANCHO CA/I-15 210-165-601-5801 47137 12/24/97 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO NOV PROF SVCS-WINCHESTER/I-15 280-199-602-5804 600.00 617.50 1,217.50 47138 12/24/97 MELTON, CAROLE REFUND:VICR FEE #TER97047012 001-170-4067 45.00 45.00 47139 12/24/97 003076 MET LIFE PRE-PAYMENT:1/98 INS.PREMIUM 001-1990 3,544.72 3,544.72 47140 12/24/97 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 480.00 480.00 47141 12/24/97 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING ST. REPAIRS:WALCOTT & C.GIRASL 001-164-601-5402 2,316.00 47141 12/24/97 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING ST. REPAIRS:WALCOTT/C. GIRASOL 001-164-601-5402 1,882.00 47141 12/24/97 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERG.GRADING OIRT RD/SANTIAGO 195-180-999-5402 2,252.00 47141 12/24/97 0008,83 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY REPAIR OF DIRT ROADS 195-180-999-5402 1,196.00 7,646.00 47142 12/24/97 001007 N P G CORP. REPAIRS TO STREET BRIDGE DECK 001-164-601-5402 1,583.74 1,583.74 47143 12/24/97 002118 NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED REIMB:BUS. CF EXPENSES 11/14 001-161-999-5261 60.64 60.64 47144 12/24/97 003078 NARDONE, JOSEPH ROOF FOR HUNTER'S KENNEL 47145 12/24/97 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5327 44.22 44.22 001-162-999-5214 197.52 197.52 47146 12/24/97 001656 OMEGA PRINT EOC MESSAGE FORMS:4 PART NCR 001-110-999-5278 219.35 47146 12/24/97 001656 OMEGA PRINT SALES TAX 001-110-999-5278 17.00 236.35 47147 12/24/97 PACIFICARE REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 20,053.70 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 790.85 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 3,919.69 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.12 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 32.40 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 401.39 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 195.26 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 911.68 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 131.88 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 676.17 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 129.58 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 491.80 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 75.34 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 66.97 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.75 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 14.78 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 .05 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .14 VOUCHER2 12/24/97 09:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 47148 12/24/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 1.54 .84 2.43 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 27,916.79 47149 12/24/97 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 49.85 49.85 47150 12/24/97 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 47150 12/24/97 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 280-199-999-5230 47150 12/24/97 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 36.50 10.75 60.35 107.60 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING 001-150-999-5254 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN HEARING NOTICE:PA97-0382 001-161-999-5256 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN NOTICE:PW95-19CSD 001-120-999-5256 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN NOTICE:PA97-0348 001-120-999-5256 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN NOTICE:97-21 001-120-999-5256 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN NOTICE:91-26 001-120-999-5256 47151 12/24/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN NOTICE:FIRE CODE 001-120-999-5256 654.55 18.50 36.00 17.25 8.25 6.25 8.00 748.80 47152 12/24/97 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 47152 12/24/97 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL P.W. MAINT 001-164-601-5238 517.20 35.33 552.53 47153 12/24/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001373-9:T.ELMO:NOVEMBER 001-162-999-5208 36.84 36.84 47154 12/24/97 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 47154 12/24/97 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 47154 12/24/97 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SRVCS - SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5212 93.35 18.21 100.00 211.56 47155 12/24/97 002812 QUINT & THIMMIG LLP 1ST INSTALL BOND COUNSEL FEE 001-2640 25,000.00 25,000.00 47156 12/24/97 000635 R & J PARTY PALACE RENTALS:O.T. HOLIDAY FEST 280-199-999-5362 163.61 163.61 47157 12/24/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SIGNATURE PLATE:CHECK SIGNING 001-140-999-5222 47157 12/24/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SIGNATURE STAMP:MANUAL CHECKS 001-140-999-5222 47157 12/24/97 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 50.00 18.00 5.27 73.27 47158 12/24/97 002400 REBEL TEMECULA EQUIPMENT RENTAL PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 70.00 70.00 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHAROS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 190-180-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS~ WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEC~RL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001'1280 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GEES NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-2640 5,466.32 698.25 4,616.80 243.00 118.00 99.00 2,129.00 157.00 7o2.00 1,326.00 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09:41 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER MANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-1280 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, NATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 47159 12/24/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 300-199-999-5246 1,719.75 3,090.00 408.25 165.00 449.09 234.00 1,250.00 38.00 986.00 1,732.50 25,627.96 47160 12/24/97 002985 RICK ENGINEERING COMPAN OCT PROF SVCS-MARGARITA RD 210-165-681-5802 4,262.85 47160 12/24/97 002985 RICK ENGINEERING COMPAN OCT PROF SVC/MARGARITA RD 210-165-681-5802 2,325.00 6,587.85 47161 12/24/97 001169 RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF TAPE OF RVSD CO MEETING 12/9 194-180-999-5224 12.50 12.50 47162 12/24/97 RODRIGUEZ, MARIA ELENA REFUND:CLEANING/INDOOR RENTAL 190-2900 100.00 100.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS APRIL SIGN POSTING SERVICES 001-161-999-5256 520.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE POSTING/PUBLIC HEARING 001-120-999-5256 65.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS SIGNS:PA97-0172,0124,0089,0118 001-161-999-5256 780.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS MAY SIGN POSTING SERVICES 001-161-999-5256 1,040.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE POSTING/PUBLIC HEARING 001-120-999-5256 260.00 47163 12/24/97 001942 S C SIGNS SIGNS:PA97-0279, 0300, & 0234 001-161-999-5256 195.00 47164 12/24/97 003081 S D R P C A SEM:K-9 TRIALS:l/17-18 NARDONE 001-170-999-5261 60.00 2,860.00 60.00 47165 12/24/97 002937 SACKETT CONSTRUCTION REPAIR:P.W. MAINT TRAILER 001-164-601-5214 940.00 940.00 47166 12/24/97 003062 SIGN XPRESS SIGNS FOR O.T. HOLIDAY FEST. 280-199-999-5362 86.74 86.74 47167 12/24/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON RANCHO VISTA ELECTRIC METER 193-180-999-5240 15.36 47167 12/24/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON VARIOUS ELETRIC METERS 191-180-999-5240 59.28 47167 12/24/97 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON HWY-79 TC1 ELECTRIC METER 191-180-999-5319 174.94 249.58 47168 12/24/97 003079 SOUTHWEST AIR & HEATING RESIDENT.IMPROV.PRGM:CHRISTIAN 165-199-813-5804 145.00 145.00 47169 12/24/97 000305 TARGET STORE SUPPLIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS 190-183-999-5370 50.65 50.65 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. AWARDS-HOLIDAY LIGHT FEST. 190-180-999-5301 61.65 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. RECOGNITION PLAQUE:D.SPAGNOLO 001-164-604-5250 113.01 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SALES TAX 001-164-604-5250 8.76 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. PLAQUE FOR TURKEY BOWL CHAMPS 001-150-999-5265 96.00 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. PLAQUE FOR HALLOWEEN "SKIT" 001-150-999-5265 63.00 47170 12/24/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 12.32 354.74 47171 12/24/97 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER SEM:BRADLEY/COUNCIL:1/16/98 001-110-999-5260 10.00 47171 12/24/97 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER SEM:BRADLEY/COUNCIL:1/16/98 001-100-999-5260 30.00 40.00 47172 12/24/97 000977 TEMECULA VALLEY SPECIAL 97/98 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING 001-101-999-5267 2,000.00 2,000.00 VOUCHRE2 12/24/97 09:41 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 47173 12/24/97 47174 12/24/97 47174 12/24/97 47175 12/24/97 47175 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47176 12/24/97 47177 12/24/97 47177 12/24/97 47177 12/24/97 47177 12/24/97 47177 12/24/97 47178 12/24/97 47178 12/24/97 47178 12/24/97 47179 12/24/97 47179 12/24/97 47179 12/24/97 47180 12/24/97 47180 12/24/97 47180 12/24/97 VENDOR NUMBER 001483 001483 000320 000320 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 003051 003051 003051 000325 000325 000325 000345 000345 000345 VENDOR NAME THE HOME DEPOT TOH DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TC~NE CENTER STATIONERS TONNE CENTER STATIONERS U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (OEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS UNITED WAY UNITED NAY UNITED WAY XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER%00S ITEM DESCRIPTION RESIDENT. IMPROV. PRGM:RONEY MITIGATION MONITOR:REGIONAL CT MITIGATION MONITOR:CM4POS VERD MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001065 DEF COHP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 OEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR ASPHALT FOR A.C REPAIRS FREIGHT SALES TAX 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 uw DEC LEASE/COPIER - CRC DEC LEASE OF COPIER - COPY CTR DEC LEASE OF COPIER - COPY CTR ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-199-813-5804 001-Z620 001-2610 001-163-999-5220 001-164-604-5220 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 280-2160 340-2160 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-164-601-5218 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 190-182-999-5239 330-2800 330-199-999-5391 ITEM AMOUNT 436.32 1,082.25 1,099.75 31.30 199.57 3,463.60 181.50 1,505.51 .75 19.37 85.63 348.16 59.59 562.50 129.63 724.64 147.42 734.10 62.88 60.32 1,523.20 50.00 118.05 97.00 5.00 17.00 67.08 1,590.54 529.49 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 436.32 2,182.00 230.87 6,356.24 1,729.36 1,691.25 119.00 2,187.11 TOTAL CHECKS 202,187.34 VOUCHRE;~ 12131197 08:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 34,922.52 2~700.00 1,579.00 11,954.21 555.07 5,636.37 1,032,782.40 50,820.17 4,287.33 47.00 4,799.43 186.60 TOTAL 1,150,270.10 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 08:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47181 12/30/97 000253 POSTMASTER BULK HAIL WTR/SPRG REC BROCHUR 190-180-999-5230 2,481.17 2,481.17 47184 12/31/97 003087 A F CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY RESIDENTIAL PRGM:TOM RONEY 165-199-813-5804 595.00 595.00 47185 12/31/97 002410 A WOMAN'S TOUCH BUILDIN DEC JANITORIAL SVCS - PARKS 190-180-999-5250 1,933.00 1,933.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY 8 COLOR PHOTOS/J.COMERCHERO 001-100-999-5250 19.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY 4X5 B&W PHOTOS/J.COMERCHERO 001-100-999-5250 84.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY VENDOR DISCOUNT 001-100-999-5250 20.60- 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY SALES TAX 001-100-999-5250 6.39 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY 16X20 GROUP PHOTO/NEW COUNCIL 001-100-999-5250 256.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY 8X10 GROUP PHOTOS/OLD COUNCIL 001-100-999-5250 228.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY 8X10 GROUP PHOTOS/NEW COUNCIL 001-100-999-5250 228.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY VENDOR DISCOUNT 001-100-999-5250 318.80- 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY CREATION, SMALL GROUP PHOTO 001-100-999-5250 85.00 47186 12/31/97 000440 AGLOW PHOTOGRAPHY SALES TAX 001-100-999-5250 37.06 604.05 47187 12/31/97 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP WE 12/6/97 K.WILLIAM 280-199-999-5362 519.23 519.23 47188 12/31/97 002541 BECKER, WALTER KARL REPAIR GRATES @ VARIOUS LOCATI 001-164-601-5402 3,908.00 3,908.00 47189 12/31/97 000586 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY MUNICIPAL CODE BOOK SERVICE 47189 12/31/97 000586 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY MUNICIPAL CODE BK=50 COPIES 001-120-999-5250 879.06 001-120-999-5250 1,785.47 2,664.53 47190 12/31/97 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOC O BUTTERFLY CF:I/6:HOGAN/DENAH 001-161-999-5261 100.00 100.00 47191 12/31/97 001004 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH STREAMBED/LK ALTERATION PERMIT 190-180-999-5250 662.00 662.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA R.C. SPORTS PARK-INSTALL SOD 190-180-999-5415 735.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA RANCHO HGHLD SANTIAGO GRND CVR 193-180-999-5212 170.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA VINEYARDS LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS 193-180-999-5212 204.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA RANCH HGHLD SHRUBS & PLANTS 193-180-999-5212 315.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSCP MTNCE:SLOPES & PARKS 190-180-999-5212 780.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSP IMPROVEMENTS STATION# 84 190-180-999-5212 105.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA LDSP IMPROVEMENTS STATION# 84 190-180-999-5212 45.00 47192 12/31/97 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CRC-INSTALL SOD @ VEE DITCH 190-180-999-5212 245.00 2,599.00 47193 12/31/97 000131 CARL WARREN & CO., INC. WILLIAMS, KATHY : 2/16/97 300-199-999-5205 47.00 47.00 47194 12/31/97 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CRC-LENS FOR GYM LIGHT FIXTURE 190-182-999-5212 38.50 47194 12/31/97 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CRC-400W METAL HALIDE M59 190-182-999-5212 75.00 47194 12/31/97 002945 CONSOLIOATED ELECTRICAL SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 8.80 122.30 47195 12/31/97 D F M ASSOICATES 98 PAPERBACK:CAL ELECTION CODE 001-120-999-5228 41.04 41.04 47196 12/31/97 002994 DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIAT CRC AIR CONDITIONING DESIGN 210-190-152-5802 4,637.50 4,637.50 47197 12/31/97 003006 DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING RESIDENTIAL PROM: TON RONEY 165-199-813-5804 900.00 900.00 47198 12/31/97 003068 DILLON CONSULTING ENGIN PROF SERVS:TEM MALL PRJT 001-162-999-5248 521.00 521.00 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 08:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47199 12/31/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP WE 12/5/97 C.DONAHOE 001-161-999-5118 47199 12/31/97 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 12/5/97 L.CABRAL 001-171-999-5118 3,204.08 977.43 4,181.51 47200 12/31/97 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE MAINT INSPECT:TEMEKU HILLS 193-180-999-5248 47200 12/31/97 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CK:HWY 79 TREES/COVERAGE 193-180-999-5248 47200 12/31/97 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK:PASEO DEL SOL 191-180-999-5248 47200 12/31/97 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK:PASEO DEL SOL 191-180-999-5248 47200 12/31/97 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK:PASEO DEL SOL 191-180-999-5248 225.00 450.00 102.60 151.20 286.20 1,215.00 47201 12/31/97 002708 ESCONDIDO COMMUNITY HEA 97-98 COMM SERVICE FUNDING 001-101-999-5267 5,000.00 5,000.00 47202 12/31/97 002122 FIRST LINE CONSTRUCTION SAM HICKS PRK-CONCRETE REPAIRS 190-180-999-5212 850.00 850.00 47203 12/31/97 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 47203 12/31/97 000170 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FRANKLIN REFILLS 1998 CLASSIC 190-180-999-5220 44.00 FREIGHT 190-180-999-5220 6.40 SALES TAX 190-180-999-5220 3.91 SANDSTONE LEATHER OPEN BINDER 001-100-999-5220 115.00 MONTICELLO RENEWAL DAY PLANNER 001-100-999-5220 28.00 MONTICELLO MASTER PACK CLASSIC 001-100-999-5220 6.00 FREIGHT 001-100-999-5220 10.40 SALES TAX 001-100-999-5220 12.35 226.06 47204 12/31/97 000184 47204 12/31/97 000184 47204 12/31/97 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4354 PALA COMM PRK G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3564 CITY HALL ALARM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-7945 CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208 30.12 320-199-999-5208 52.94 320-199-999-5208 51.79 134.85 47205 12/31/97 001937 GALLS, INC. 7 CELL PHONE HOLSTERS 47205 12/31/97 001937 GALLS, INC. 7 CELL PHONE HOLSTERS 47205 12/31/97 001937 GALLS, INC. FREIGHT 47205 12/31/97 001937 GALLS, INC. FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242 25.98 001-110-999-5242 64.95 320-199-999-5242 2.28 001-110-999-5242 5.71 98.92 47206 12/31/97 002416 GENESIS CONSTRUCTION RELEASE KEMMIS EQIUP STP NOTIC 210-2038 41,182.67 41,182.67 47207 12/31/97 002528 GLASS BLASTERS NEW HIRE MUGS 001-150-999-5265 132.00 47207 12/31/97 002528 GLASS BLASTERS SALES TAX 001-150-999-5265 10.23 142.23 47208 12/31/97 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 272.85 47208 12/31/97 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 179.20 452.05 47209 12/31/97 002129 GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS, REL MONIES FOR UNCOMPLETED WRK 210-190-626-5804 5,000.00 5,000.00 47210 12/31/97 000378 HAFELI, THOMAS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 320-199-999-5221 133.79 133.79 47211 12/31/97 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EAP PROGRAM MONTHY FEE 001-150-999-5250 379.85 379.85 47212 12/31/97 HILL, BARBARA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 47Z13 12/31/97 IMPERIAL SHADE & VENETI REFUND:OVRPMT BUSINESS LICENSE 001-199-4056 20.00 20.00 47214 12/31/97 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC POOL 190-182-999-5212 245.68 245.68 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 08:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 3 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 47215 12/31/97 KILBY, DARRYL G REFUND: INDOOR RENTAL DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 47216 12/31/97 LENNAR HOMES OF CALIF SENT TO THE CITY BY ERROR 001-1990 390.00 390.00 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 47217 12/31/97 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS/R.ROBERTS 001-100-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-100-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY SEAL ON ENVELOPE/LTRHEAD 001-163-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY SEAL ON ENVELOPE/LTRHEAD 001-165-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY SEAL ON ENVELOPE/LTRHEAD 001-164-604-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-163-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-165-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-164-604-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS QTY 1000 LETTERHEAD PAPER 001-120-999-5222 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-120-999-5222 102.50 7.94 165.96 165.96 82.99 12.86 12.86 6.44 234.14 18.15 809.80 47218 12/31/97 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES FOR PW 001-164-601-5218 4.57 4.57 47219 12/31/97 002105 OLD TOgN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 190-180-999-5214 105.63 105.63 47220 12/31/97 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES DEC PARK MAINT/DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 800.00 800.00 47221 12/31/97 002422 PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY ORANGE CO. PHONE BOOK 001-140-999-5228 41.65 41.65 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER 25-CELLUAR PCS TELEPHONES 320-199-999-5242 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER 6-ERICSSON CAR LIGHTER ADAPTER 320-199-999-5242 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER 3-CELLUAR PCS TELEPHONES 320-199-999-5242 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-161-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/OEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-162-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 190-180-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 280-199-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/OEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-100-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-110-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-150-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/OEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-164-604-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-163-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-164-601-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 320-199-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-120-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-140-999-5208 47222 12/31/97 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER NOV/DEC MOBILE PHONE SERVICE 001-164-604-5208 3,350.00 210.00 275.90 402.00 31.16 187.26 105.68 684.85 209.07 430.12 105.68 105.68 105.68 242.82 211.36 219.72 115.37 114.03 105.68 7,212.06 47223 12/31/97 PACITTO CONSTRUCTION REFUND:OVRPMT B97-2273 001-2660 30.44 30.44 47224 12/31/97 PEI-WEN LI REFD QUIMBY TR25892 MS97-4220 120-199-4240 47225 12/31/97 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN AD:O.T. DICKENS: 2 COLOR FLYER 280-199-999-5362 2,700.00 2,556.89 2,700.00 2,556.89 47226 12/31/97 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 75.38 75.38 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 08:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION 47227 12/31/97 002930 47227 12/31/97 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR HATS RENTAL:CITY HALL PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL: CRC 47227 12/31/97 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL: MAINT FAC 47227 12/31/97 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL= SR CENTER 47227 12/31/97 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL=TCC 47228 47228 47229 47230 47230 47230 47231 ACCOUNT NUMBER 340'199'701-5250 190-182-999'5250 340-199-702-5212 190-181'999'5250 190-184-999-5250 12/31/97 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO. EMERG HYD HOSE REPAIRS:PW EQUI 001-164-601-5214 12/31/97 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO. BACKHOE WORK FOR PUBLIC WORKS 001-164-601-5214 12/31/97 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MAILING BAGS FOR PLANBID PKGES 001-120-999-5220 12/31/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 12/31/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 12/31/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS AD:2 HALF PG:O.T. FESTIVITIES SMALL EQUIPMENT FOR FIRE DEPT SALES TAX 12/31/97 001279 RANCHO NEWS, INC. 47232 12/31/97 002931 RESCUE SOURCE, THE 47232 12/31/97 002931 RESCUE SOURCE, THE 12/31/97 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS NOVEMBER 97 LEGAL SERVICES 12/31/97 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH-VC ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVS 47233 47234 NOTICES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS RAISE CANOPIES ON RANCHO CAL R DEC PEST CONTROL SVC/CITY HALL SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT SALES TAX CITYWIDE TRASH COLLECTION SERV REFUND: INDOOR RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 1997 EMP OF YEAR AWARO GOO0 MORN WASHINGTON:l/16:MJM 97-98 COMM SERVICE FUNDING REFUND: INDOOR RENTAL DEPOSIT 47235 12/31/97 47236 12/31/97 47237 12/31/97 47238 12/31/97 47238 12/31/97 47238 12/31/97 47239 12/31/97 001035 47240 12/31/97 47241 12/31/97 47242 001942 S C SIGNS 003060 SONSHINE LANDSCAPE COMP 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR 002267 SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMEN 002267 SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMEN 002267 SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMEN TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL TEMECULA MURRIETA DEMOC TEMECULA PLAY & LEARN S 12/31/97 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 12/31/97 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER 47243 47244 12/31/97 003086 TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER 47245 12/31/97 TEMECULA VLLY ACOUSTIC 47246 12/31/97 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES:CIP DIVISION 47247 12/31/97 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO 97-98 COMM SERVICE FUNDING 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 280-199-999-5362 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 165-199-999-5246 001-162-999-5250 001-161-999-5256 193-180-999-5212 340-199-701-5250 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 194-180-999-5315 190-2900 190-2900 001-150-999-5265 280-199-999-5260 001-101-999-5267 190-2900 001-165-999-5220 001-101-999-5267 ITEM AMOUNT 85.80 160.50 44.80 64.70 69.40 186.05 231.13 42.67 345.88 15.07 1,877.37 402.13 317.70 23.03 84.00 200.00 555.00 2,395.00 56.00 35.00 38.00 5.66 1,032,782.40 100.00 100.00 100.69 10.00 3,000.00 100.00 41.82 2,000.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 425.20 417.18 42.67 2,238.32 402.13 340.73 84.00 200.00 555.00 2,395.00 56.00 78.66 1,032,782.40 100.00 100.00 100.69 10.00 3,000.00 100.00 41.82 2,000.00 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 08:48 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 47248 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47249 12/31/97 47250 12/31/97 47250 12/31/97 47250 12/31/97 47251 12/31/97 47251 12/31/97 47251 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47252 12/31/97 47253 12/31/97 47254 12/31/97 VENDOR NUMBER 002706 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002702 002923 002923 002923 002065 002065 002065 000792 000792 000792 000792 000792 000792 000792 000792 000792 VENDOR NAME U S POSTAL SERVICE U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS U S RENTALS U S RENTALS U S RENTALS UNISOURCE UNISOURCE UNISOURCE UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSO E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E UNIVERSITY OF CA:RVSD E W C D ENTERTAINMENT WRIGHT, RUTH CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION ANNUAL REPRT OF MAIL ROUTES POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT FULL SIZE PICK-UP TRUCK RENTAL SALES TAX REPAIRS TO RENTAL VEHICLE PAPER FOR POLICE NEIGH NWSLTTR SALES TAX COLORED PAPER:SPECIAL EVENTS SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 SECRETARY TRAINING 11/5/97 REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5250 001-170-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-164-604-5230 320-199-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 001-164-601-5238 001-164-601-5238 001-164-601-5238 001-170-999-5292 001-170-999-5292 190-180-999-5254 001-150-999-5248 001-163-999-5248 190-180-999-5248 001-120-999-5250 001-110-999-5248 280-199-999-5248 001-162-999-5261 001-161-999-5248 001-140-999-5248 190-2900 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 22.50 21.72 51.38 183.19 129.65 204.45 6.00 417.03 42.62 444.12 153.35 13.75 270.01 872.98 46.50 272.98- 304.15 23.57 142.46 2,440.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 320.00 100.00 100.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 22.50 1,937.27 646.50 470.18 5,000.00 100.00 100.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,150,270.10 VOUCHRE2 1 Z/31/97 09:08 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND 001 190 '210 280 320 TITLE GENERAL FUND COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP INFORMATION SYSTEMS AMOUNT 362,384.54 5,032.72 221,017.83 14,999.86 5,338.47 TOTAL 608,TT'5.42 VOUCHRE2 12/31/97 09:08 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 47257 01/13/98 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN CYBEX COMMANDER AUTO SWITCH 47257 01/13/98 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN SALES TAX 47258 01/13/98 003077 G T E CALIFORNIA RELOCATION OF GTE FACILITIES 47259 01/13/98 002666 MASON & MASON REAL ESTA PROF APPRAISAL SERVICES 47260 01/13/98 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO 47261 01/13/98 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 47261 01/13/98 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 47261 01/13/98 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING 47262 01/13/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 47263 01/13/98 001007 N P G CORP. 47263 01/13/98 001007 N P G CORP. 47264 01/13/98 002790 PETER-BUILT HOMES/PACIT 47265 01/13/98 000267 RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT NOV PROF SVCS-PALA RD BRIDGE CHANNEL CLEANING:JEDEDIAH SHIT CHANNEL CLEANING:JEDEDIAH SMIT SANTIAGO DESILTING PONDS CITYWIDE ASSES SERVS:JAN/MARCH A.C. REPAIRS TO RAINBOW CANYON A.C. REPAIRS ON RAINBOW CYN RD 6TH DRAW=STAGE STP/6TH STREET 1ST QTR FY 97-98 FIRE SERVICES 47266 01/13/98 000355 RIVERSIDE CO. REGIST. V ELECTION SERVS:NOV 4,1997 47266 01/13/98 000355 RIVERSIDE CO. REGIST. V ELECTION SERVS:NOV 4,1997 47267 01/13/98 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM DRAW REQUEST:8" WATER LINE 47268 01/13/98 000341 47268 01/13/98 000341 ACCOUNT NUMBER 320'1970 320-1970 210-165-601-5804 001-1280 210-165-631-5802 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5401 001-164-601-5401 190-180-999-5370 001-164-601-5402 001-164-601-5402 280-1500 001-171-999-5251 001-120-999-5225 001-2675 210-190-808-5804 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES,INC. SIGNAL DESIGNS PN97-23/PW97-24 210-165-690-5802 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES,INC. SIGNAL DESIGNS PW97-Z3/PW97-24 210-165-674-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 4,954.50 383.97 177,657.00 8,750.00 9,571.63 12,994.00 6,370.00 11,179.00 5,032.72 1,100.00 11,850.00 14,999.86 283,846.67 24,652.69 1,642.18 27,273.60 3,257.80 3,257.80 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 5,338.47 177,657.00 8,750.00 9,571.63 30,543.00 5,032.72 12,950.00 14,999.86 283,846.67 26,294.87 27,273.60 6,515.60 TOTAL CHECKS 608,773.42 ITEM 4 . . .. . CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 13, 1998 City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1997 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finan/~e Director ~ Jesse Diaz, Project Accountant ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1997. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of November 30, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1997 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of November 30, 1997 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of November 30, 1997 Cash Activity for the Month of November: Cash and Investments as of November 1, 1997 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of November 30, 1997 49,704,065 1,600,461 (2,887,658) 48,416,868 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Sweep Account (Money Market Account) Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Checking Accounts (Sherwood/Pujol Apartments) Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-TCSD COPs (Guaranteed Investment Contract) Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds (Money Market Account) Reserve Account-RDA Bonds (Guaranteed Investment Contract) Institution City Hall Union Bank Union Bank (Highmark U.S. Treasury) Union Bank State Treasurer Home Savings of America Yield 4.670 % 5.715 % Matudty Date (2) Contractual/ Market Value $ 1,500 (374,926) 798,095 9,159 34,879,951 16,343 ICMA 419,459 PEBSCO 687,879 PEBSCO 81,343 First Trust (First Am. Treasury) 5.041% 17,460 PadBook Balance 1,500 (374,926) (1) 798,095 Bayerische Landesbank First Trust (First Am. Treasury) Bayerische Landesbank 9,159 (1) 34,879,951 (3) 16,343 419,459 687,879 81,343 17,460 6.870 % 502,690 502,690 5.041 % 9,928,995 9,928,995 7.400 % 1,448,920 1,448,920 $ 48,416,868 (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-All investments are liquid and currently available. (3)-At November 30, 1997 total market value for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $27,491,109,735. The City's proportionate share of that value is $35,143,944. The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next six months. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of November 30, 1997 Assets: Cash and investments $ 30,829,321 Receivables 4,907,489 Due from other funds 2,251,976 Land held for resale Prepaid assets 47,049 Deposits 286,789 Fixed assets-net 991,529 Total assets $ 39,314,15~3 Community Services Redevelopment District A~lenc~ $ 936,732 $ 16,650,815 $ 135,033 1,107,091 10,907 2,103,053 Total 48,416,868 6,149,613 2,262,883 2,103,053 47,049 286,789 991,529 $ 1,082~672 $ 19,860,959 $ 60,257,78.~_4 Liabilities and fund equity' Liabilities: Due to other funds $ 1,140,472 Other liabilities 4,278,936 $ 10,907$ 1,111,504$ 2,262,883 141,172 599,979 5,020,087 Total liabilities 5,419,408 152,079 1,711,483 7,282,970 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,281,781 Retained eamings 372,175 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 9,810,052 Designated (3) 17,979,221 Undesignated 4,451~516 1,281,781 372,175 1,013,090 7,310,814 18,133,956 229,703 10,838,662 29,047,586 (312,200) 4,139,316 Total fund equity 33,894~745 930,593 18,149,476 52,974,814 $ 39~314~153 $ 11082,672 $ 19,860,959 $ 60,257,784 Total liabilities and fund equity (1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds. (2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iowlmod housing, and debt service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, future capital projects, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 13, 1998 Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997. Please see the attached financial statements for the analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1997 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Combining Balance Sheets (Internal Service Funds) as of September 30, 1997 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due t~om other funds Advances to other funds Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities General Fund $ 7,533,396 2,932,940 3,254,048 1,035,583 $ 14,755,967 $ 3,382,955 Total liabilities 3,382, 955 Gas Tax R.C. Reimb Dev Impact CDBG Fund District Fund Fund 151,532 $ 170,576 $ 6,089,066 $ 81,137 2,344 80,248 $ 1,540 795,304 232,669 $ 172,920 $ 6,964,618 $ 1,54~05 7,864 $ 593,754 7,864 593,754 $ 1,540 1,540 AB2766 Fund 226,406 13,687 240,093 Fund balances: Reserved $ 2,379,849 Designated 5,336,922 Undesignated 3,656,241 $ 224,805 $ 172,920 $ 6,370,864 Total fund balances 11,373,012 224,805 172,920 6,370,864 $ 232,669 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 14,755,967 $ 172,920 $ 6,964,618 $ 1,540 $ $ 240,093 240,093 240,093 Please note that these balances are unaudited City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due fxom other funds Advances to other funds Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Total liabilities Measure "A" Fund 2,289,117 115,195 2,404,312 CIP Fund Marg Rd Reim Dist Fund Deferred Comp Fund $ 11,622,914 542,908 $ 1,107,337 $ $ 12,165,822 $ 1,107,337 $ $ 842,570 880,806 1,723,376 126,942 126,942 1,107,337 1,107,337 Total 29,190,344 3,769,999 4,049,352 1,035,583 38,045,278 971,052 5,972,716 6,943,768 Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances 2,404,312 2,404,312 2,404,312 1,042,862 9,399,584 10,442,446 $ 12,165,822 (126,942) (126,942) $ 1,107,337 3,422,711 24,149,500 3,529,299 31,101,510 $ 38,045,278 Please note that these balances are unaudited City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues Sales tax Developmental services: Planning Building & safety Engineering AB3229 (COPS) Fire plan check and inspection Motor vehicle in lieu Property tax Property transfer tax Franchise fees Transient occupancy tax Reimbursements Reimbursements from TCSD Reimbursements from RDA Investment interest Business licenses Vehicle code fines Miscellaneous Bids & proposals Parking citations/impound fees Operating transfers in Total Revenues Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 8,520,000 $ 2,198,692 295,000 70,183 1,495,000 344,539 950,000 320,967 97,000 99,245 100,000 23,182 1,695,650 436,824 1,176,300 1,493 150,000 27,541 988,000 163,672 730,000 210,125 250,000 57,844 162,000 40,500 125,000 31,250 825,000 316,640 142,000 12,320 40,000 11,811 29,400 6,108 4,000 3,860 67,000 28,083 863,000 0 18,704,350 $ 4,404,879 Perccnt of Budget 26% 24% 23% 34% 102% (1) 23% 26% 0% (2) 18% 17% 29% 23% 25% 25% 38% 9% O) 30% 21% 97% 42% 0% (4) 24% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Expenditures: Annual YTD Amended YTD Activity Budset Activi~ Encumbr. + Enoumbr City Council $ 271,610 $ 64,756 $ 923 $ 65,679 Community Support 305,500 38,175 2,500 40,675 City Manager 519,815 129,011 3,999 133,010 City Clerk 598,894 119,882 8,675 128,557 City Attorney 385,000 94,040 94,040 Finance 934,447 204,623 43,489 248,112 Human Resources 319,056 75,944 75,944 Planning 1,510,055 328,412 72,755 401,167 Building & Safety 1,131,710 265,156 138,601 403,757 Engineering 978,070 209,312 9,436 218,748 Public Works 2,168,934 395,296 335,857 731,153 CIP Admin 730,430 141,397 5,533 146,930 Police 5,135,374 1,055,079 6,994 1,062,073 Fire Dept 1,676,864 295,700 11,039 306,739 Animal Control 50,000 13,610 13,610 Non-departmental 1,324,060 299,175 299,175 Operating transfers out 7,574,700 7,574,700 7,574,700 Total Expenditures 25,614,519 11,304,268 639,801 11,944,069 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ (6,910,169) (6,899,389) 18,272,401 18,272,401 11,362,232 $ 11,373,012 Percent of Budset 24% 13% 26% 21% 24% 27% 24% 27% 36% 22% 34% 20% 21% 18% 27% 23% 100% 47% (5) (6) (7) (8) (1) The annual apportioment of AB3229 (COPS) revenue was received in September. (2) The variance in Property tax revenue is due receipts not being received until December. (3) The variance in Business license revenue is due to the timing of the annual license renewal which occurs in January. (4) The variance in Operating transfers in is due to the timing of the transfer recorded between the Gas tax fund and the General fund which takes place at year end. (5) Funding awarded to local organizations through the Community Services Funding program had not been disbursed by the end of September. (6) The variance is due to the encumbrance for plan check services being recorded for the entire year. (7) The variance is due to the encumbrance recorded for street maintenance projects. (8) The variance is due to transfers from the General Fund which have been recorded for the entire fiscal year. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Oas Tax Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Section 2105-2107 Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 783,000 $ 224,028 10,000 777 793,000 224,805 793,000 224,805 $ 224,805 Eneumbr. Total Activity Percent of Budget $ 224,028 29% 777 8% 224,805 28% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Rancho California Road Reimbursement District For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Investment interest Annual Amended YTD Budset Activity $ 2,344 Encumbr. Total Activity $ 2,344 Percent of Budget Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 170,576 2,344 170,576 $ 170,576 $ 172,920 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Development Impact Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Old Fees: Public facilities Parks/habitat Fire Signal mitigation Library Quimby New Fees: Street improvements Traffic signals Parks Corporate facilities Fire protection Library Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity $ 441,968 18,020 43,130 17,818 10,200 11,655 1,002,023 176,879 150,328 24,953 1,288,800 197,456 7,754 49,459 2,150 166,400 2,854,466 11,408,347 11,408,347 80,248 834,775 Encumbrance Total Activity $ 441,968 18,020 43,130 17,818 10,200 11,655 176,879 24,953 7,754 2,150 80,248 834,775 Percent of Budget 18% 17% 4% 4% 29% (1) Revenues Over/COn&r) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 (8,553,881) 834,775 5,536,089 5,536,089 $ q3,017,792~ $ 6,370,864 (1) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when the DIF funded CIP projects are started and costs are incurred. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes m Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Community Development Block Grant For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Grant revenue Total Revenues Expenditures: Other outside services Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget 424,354 $ $ (1) 424,354 46,804 377,550 424,354 $ $ (1) The variance in Grant revenue is due to no expenditures being recognized in the fund during the first quarter. No expenditures in the form of claims for reimbursement were paid. (1) (1) City of Temeeula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Chanses in Fund Balance - Budset and Actual AB 2766 Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: AB 2766 Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity $ 48,000 $ 10,831 3,037 48,000 13,868 200,000 200,000 (152,000) 13,868 226,225 226,225 $ 74,225 $ 240,093 Eneumbr. Total Activity $ 10,831 3,037 13,868 Percent of Budget 23% 29% City of Temeeula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure "A" For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Measure "A" Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Total Budget Activity Eneumbr. Activity 904,036 $ 238,985 $ 238,985 30,497 30,497 904,036 269,482 269,482 2,839,623 (1,935,587) 269,482 2,134,830 2,134,830 $ 199,243 $ 2,404,312 Percent of Budget 26% 30% (1) (1) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when projects are started and costs are incurred. 10 City of Tcmccula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget ActiviW Revenues: Operating transfers in Grants Contributions Investment interest Article 3 (SB 821) 23,669,302 $ 3,014,286 179,645 104,200 7,374,700 11,064 Total Revenues 26,967,433 7,385,764 Expenditures: Rancho Ca. Rd interchange Western bypass corridor Pala Rd. bridge Diaz Rd. I 15/1215 corridor study Walcott bypass Signal interconnect system Traffic signals - South 79/Margarita Traffic signals - Winehester/Roripaugh Traffic signals - Margarita/Solana Pavement management I15/79S interchange I15/79S interchange (interim) Pala Road improvements Pavement management system update Traffic signals Rancho Ca. Rd./Via Las Colinas Flashing signals at schools Traffic signals Winchester/Enterprise Traffic signals Margarita Rd./Santiago Traffic signals 79S/Bedford Court City sidewalk project (various) Diaz Rd. extension Margarita Rd. improvements Median construction - Rancho Ca. Rd. Ynez/Overland improvements SW traffic study TVHS frontage street improvement Winchester Rd. improvements Ynez Rd. improvements Lighting - Jefferson St. Traffic signals - Pala/Rainbow Cyn. Traffic signals - Rancho Ca./Meadows Pkwy Traffic signals - Margarita/Yukon Traffic signals - Pauba/Station 84 Temeoula Park and Ride Winchester sidewalk project Storm drainage system Margarita/Overland Dr. Winchester/1-15 ramp improvements (continued) 3,815,630 153,641 2,665,546 495,752 2,730 37,215 360,069 17,147 3,500 49,882 1,076,781 103,236 1,200,000 150,000 21,436 125,000 125,000 125,000 120,000 120,359 131,295 1,400,000 3,780,000 69,400 2,200,000 21,500 350,000 200,000 605,000 300,000 100,000 125,000 104,095 75,000 200,000 7,000 1,200,000 120,712 8,764 $ 32,638 (69,619) 10,052 62,999 469 1,000 25,647 5,142 9,600 15,181 6,376 71,598 9,588 100,580 126,636 1,455 42 282 189 Encumbr. Total Activity $ 7,374,700 11,064 7,385,764 326 121,947 115,195 1,154 12,494 217,461 17,147 3,500 88,187 72,816 844 5,840 9,090 154,585 45,576 1,154 22,546 280,460 17,616 3,500 1,000 113,834 77,958 9,600 16,025 12,216 29,816 5,016 139,021 75,243 101,414 14,604 239,601 201,879 1,455 5,518 5,560 282 189 Percent of Budget 31% 27% 0% 101% 2% 42% 61% 78% 103% 100% 2% 11% 76% 6% 75% 10% 84% 11% 6% 9% 1% 5% 4% 0% 11 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Fund For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Margarita community park Sports park improvements Parkview site project Duck pond park Maintenance yard Multi-trails system Various park improvements (ADA) Winchester creek park Temeeula Community Center Community Recreation Center improvements Sports park sidewalk Fire station Museum Temecula entry monument Annual Amended YTD Encumbr. 2,263,573 7,704 5,159 88,347 23,334 23,334 821,186 21,825 14,324 39,086 9,486 30,693 50,000 154,082 4,028 2,445 716,373 5,499 2,571 204,816 148,110 437 200,000 958 25,455 107,076 75,714 26,856 540,062 44,718 25,000 500 Total Expenditures 27,137,971 588,988 1,042,862 Revenues Over/CLlnder) Expenditures (170,538) 6,796,776 3,645,670 3,645,670 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 3,475,132 $ Total 12,863 23,334 36,149 40,179 6,473 8,070 437 26,413 102,570 44,718 5OO 10,442,446 1,631,850 Percent 1% 100% 4% 103% 4% 1% 0% 13% 96% 8% 2% 6% The variances in CIP Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing of when the various projects are actually started. 12 City of Temeeula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Margarita Road Reimbursement District For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Total Revenues Total Expenditures Revenues Over/CLlnder) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity $ 9,250 (136,192) (136,192) 9,250 (136,192) $ (126,942) Eneumbr. Total Activity Perccnt of Budget 13 Internal Service Funds Combining Bahnee Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Prepaid assets Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) Total assets Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Due to other funds Current liabilities Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity $ Insui'anc¢ Fund 1,556,061 23,116 47,048 1,626,225 265,142 265,142 500,000 861,083 1,361,083 1,626,225 Vehicles Fund Information Support Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund 127,401 1,589 191,367 $ 96,472 $ 2,633 1,041 120,908 249,898 555,849 555,849 $ 240,514 434,514 $ 97,513 $ 29,960 34,994 64,954 275,608 $ 16,978 275,608 16,978 214,539 35,359 249,898 249,898 473,065 17,830 490,895 555,849 94,177 64,729 158,906 $ 434,514 80,535 8O,535 $ 97,513 $ Total 1,971,301 28,379 47,048 917,271 2,963,999 29,960 592,722 622,682 1,281,781 1,059,536 2,341,317 2,963,999 Please note that these balances are unaudited. 14 City of Temeeula Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Internal Service Funds For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Charges for services $ Investment interest Miscellaneous Operating transfers in Total Revenues Expenses: Salaries & wages Operating expenses Interest Depreciation Total Expenses Net Income (Loss) Retained Earnings, July 1, 1997 Retained Earnings, September 30, 1997 $ Insurance Vehicles Fund Fund Information Systems Fund Support Services Fund 84,175 $ 14,075 20,290 1,589 11,605 72 200,000 178,512 $ 42 65,698 2,633 Facilities Fund $ 74,181 1,041 Total $ 416,641 25,553 11,719 200,000 316,070 15,736 178,554 68,331 75,222 653,913 37,594 63,418 10,540 32,983 4,550 18,625 66,698 2,230 96,944 99,174 31,325 43,671 74,996 16,200 16,200 77,500 178,512 216,896 (464) 42 1,633 226 644,187 35,823 17,788 63,096 80,309 861,083 $ 35,359 $ 80,535 $ 17,830 $ 64,729 81,689 237,016 4,550 112,325 435,580 218,333 841,203 $ 1,059,536 15 ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~C~E CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager January 13, 1997 Indian Gaming Industry in California PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve sending letters of support, signed by the Mayor, for Indian Gaming in California to local, State and Federal authorities. BACKGROUND: This Staff Report is presented at the request of the Pechanga Indian Reservation, Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians. Recently, Nevada interests have increased their efforts to limit/curtail Indian gaming in California by requesting that Attorney General Janet Reno put an immediate stop to all Indian gaming in this State. Currently, there is a one year moratorium on the Secretary of Interior's authority to approve State/Tribal agreements ("Compacts"), as well as a limit on the National Indian Gaming Commission's authority to issue new regulations affecting the definition of games in order to limit the games offered at Indian casinos. In a recent testimony, Senator Diane Feinstein offered unfavorable views on Indian gaming and tribal sovereignty, basing her opinion on the inability of tribal governments to resolve local jurisdictional issues. Her testimony may ultimately threaten the continuance of Indian gaming in California, and directly contradicts the relationship between the Pechanga Indians and the City of Temecula. Our neighbors, the Pechanga Indians, have worked cooperatively and amicably with City representatives to find solutions to a variety of issues, including major improvements to Pala Bridge and Pala Road. Both representatives from the City Council and Staff have held several successful meetings with the Pechanga Tribal Council, resolving local jurisdictional issues and improving infrastructure in that vicinity. Additionally, the Pechanga Casino, while creating an increase of traffic in the Pala region, has not only been profitable to the Indians, but has also increased the tourist draw to the City of Temecula. This stimulation in the City's tourism is expected to continue for years to come. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: City Clerk/Director of Support Services DATE: January 13, 1998 SUBJECT: Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for P.C. workstations to Western Data Technology of Riverside, California in the amount of $1,640.00 per unit, plus sales tax, for a total purchase amount of $21,241.50. BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose to select a qualified vendor to purchase twelve (12) P.C. workstations. These workstations were requested by the various City departments and budgeted for in the current 97/98 fiscal budget. A total of nine proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a low of $1,640.00 from Western Data Technology of Riverside to a high of $2,606.08 submitted by AGAPE Computer Service of Temecula. Twenty-five RFP packets were mailed, of which the following nine vendors responded: Vendor Per Unit Quote Western Data Technology, Riverside Golden State Trading Co, Brea Valley Micro Computers, Temecula New Technologies, Santa Fe Springs Omni Data, Riverside IKON Office Solutions, Redlands CAMCO Industries, Temecula CompUSA, San Bernardino AGAPE Computer Service, Temecula $1,640.00 plus tax $1,649.00 " $1,750.00 " $1,797.62 $1,975.00 " $2,034.65 " $2,195.00 " $2,447.72 " $2,606.08 " Western Data Technology of Riverside submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all the technical specifications of the RFP. Agenda Report Award of Contract for P.C. Workstations Page 2. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Budget for Information Services Internal Service fund to accommodate this purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Request for Proposal Scope of Work - Western Data Technology Equipment Purchase Agreement EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SCOPE OF WORK/PROPOSAL SHEETS PART I: E(~UIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS PC Workstation Mini-Tower Case w/250+ watt power supply 2 4.0 0 Processor Intel Pentium NINIX 233 With Fan 2 9 4.0 0 , Chip set Intel 430TX drip set Motherboard 7 3. O O Memory 32MB 2-4x32 72 Pin 16 MB Simms 62.00 L2 cache $12K pipeli-ed-burst cache On Motherboard Inc. , Floppy Disk 3.5" 1.44MB Sony 1 8.0 0 Hard Disk 3GB (M'mimum) Western Digital 17 5.0 0 CD-ROM 20X (Minimum) 2 4x Teac 6 7.0 0 Monitor Samsung SyncMaster 700B 17-inch .28mm dot pitch 4 8 0.0 0 Graphics Card Trident PC164-bit graphics accelerator (2MB) 2 ?. 0 0 Network Card 3Com Fast EtherLink XL PCI NIC 3C905 5 5.0 0 Sound Card Creative Sound Blaster 4 0,0 0 Ports 2 Serial ports, 1 Parallel port, 2 USB ports . 5.0 0 Keyboard Microsoft Natural Keyboard 3 9.0 0 Mouse Mircosofi PS2/Serial Mouse With Pad 18.0 0 UPS : APC Power Back-UPS 400VA 110.0 0 Software Windows 95 6 3.0 0 Warranty Three (3) years parts and labor (on-site) Non Taxable 9 0.0 0 Technical support 8am to 5pro Monday thru Friday I n c. , All systems must be fully compatible with the City's existing Novell 4.1 Ethemet Network systems and be EPA Energy Star compliant. PART II: PRICING ITEM QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Computer equipment per specifications (PART 1) 12 1,6 4 0.0 0 19,6 8 0.0 0 Delivery 12 O 0 0 Sales Tax 1,441 50 , , · Other Costs (please identify) ___ TOTAL PRICE ,,, 21 .gal .Sfl EXHIBIT B EOUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of January 13, 1998, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Western Data Technology, 8720 Van Buren Blvd, Riverside, California ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: _ 1. Purchase and Sale,..0f Equipment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City twelve (12) Pentium Computer Workstations as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). 2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is Twenty-one thousand, two hundred Dollars and fifty cents ($21,241.50) The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: N~t 30 [Add additional language regarding unit pricing if applicabl~] 3. Representations and Warranties of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Computer Workstations on a Novell 4. I network and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 4. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before Thursday, February 5, 1998. - 5. Place of Delivery.. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location. 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 6. Title and Risk of Loss. Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until at~er inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 7, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. NO Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance fxom Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the Equipment or Vendor's maintenance thereof, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. {Tontract Documents. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof~ (1) Request for Proposal dated November 25, 1997, attached hereto as Exhibit B; (2) Vendor's response to the Request for Proposal dated December 11, 1997, attached hereto as Exhibit C, except for None b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's Response to the RFP. 12. Remedies. The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 13. Survival of Reprt,¢ntations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and perform_ante of this Agreement. 14. Legal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 15. A~ignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Vendor without the express written consent of City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. 16. SeverabiliW. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 17. Entire Agreement: Modification: Waiver. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 18. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third business day aRer mailing if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, or on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight carrier for delivery the next business day, and properly addressed as follows: To Vendor at: Western Data Technology 8720 Van Buren B!v~l Riverside, Californi~ 92509 To City at: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attn: City Manager Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new address in the manner set forth above. 19. Effects of Headings. The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions: 20. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. //// 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed in on the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: Ron Roberts Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney Vendor 11 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SCOPE OF WORK/PROPOSAL SHEETS PART I: .... E()U1PME ,NT SPECIFICATIONS ............... PC Workstation Mini-Tower Cnse w/250+ watt power supply 2 4.0 0 Processor Intel Pentlure MMX 233 With Fan 2 9 4.0 0 Chip set Intel 430TX chip set Motherboard 7 3 0 0 ,, , , L L I L" , I I II, H , I I I I ['I ~ Memory 32MB 2-4x32 72 Pin 16 MB Simms 62.00 L2 cache 512K pipelined-burst cache On Motherboard Inc. Floppy Disk 3.5" 1.44MB So,n¥. 1 8 fl 0 H~dDisk 3OB(Min~mum) Western Digital 175 00 CD-ROM 20X (Mi~num) 2 4x Teac 6 7.00 Monitor Samsung SyncMaster 700B 17-inch .28mm dot pitch 4 8 0.0 0 Graphics Card Trident PC164-bit graphics accelerator (2MB) 2 7 0 0 " " , , , , ' , J , , · , ,L . · , · N¢lwork C~d 3Corn Fast F-therL~k XL PCI NIC 3C905 5 5.0 0 Sound Card Creative Sound Biaslet 4 0,0 0 Ports 2 Serial ports, I Parallel port, 2 USB ports 5.0 0 Keyboard Microsoft Natural'Keyboard 3 9.0 0 Mouse Mircosofi PS2/Seri-I Mouse With Pad 1 8 0 0 UPS APC Power Back-UPS 400VA 110.0 0 Software .Windows 95 6 3 0 0 Warranly Three (3) years parts and labor(on-site) Non Taxable 90.00 _ Technical support gnm to 5pm Monday thin Friday Inc. All systems must be fully compatible with the City's existing Novell 4. i Elbemet Network systems and be EPA Energy Star compliant, PART i1: PRICING ,, , , i L ,UI Ill I l, I I IIII , I ,,I · ' , t [ it I ,Ill ITEM QTY UNff PRICE TOTAL PRICE Computer equipment per specifications (PART 1) 12 1,6 4 0.0 0 19,6 8 0 0 0 , · , II I ,l I , I , · , ,! ,l I II I , t' LIS I , · ,, Dclivcry ........ 12 0 0 O Sales Tax 1,441.50 · I Sl I , l, , I I, In , Ill I I I , ' · 11 , I I~,lll 11 I I Other Costs (please identify) ___ TOTAL PRICE ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DI RECTOI~,...~,~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June Greek, City Clerk January 13, 1998 Records Destruction Approval PREPARED BY: Gwyn Flores, Records Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain City records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with State of California Government Code, Sections 34090 through 34090.7. Attached Exhibit "A," lists records from the Finance Department, Accounts Payable Invoices from Fiscal Year 1994/95 A-N, 1992/93 G/L Detail Report, 07/92-12/92 and 01/93-06/93 Accounts Payable Cash Disbursement Journals and the 1990 Accounting System Implementation G/L Reports. These records have been identified within Group IV of the retent'ion schedule, and have been scanned into the City's LaserFiche Imaging System. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed the Exhibit, as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: Destruction of Records Request, Finance Department Exhibit "A", List of Records recommended for destruction r:\flores\destroy.ar TO: FROM: June Greek, City Clerk Gwyn Flores, Records Coordinator DATE: January 13, 1998 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of: Accounts Payable Invoices Fiscal Year 1994/95 A-N (Retention Code 40106), 1992/93 G/L Detail Report, 07/92-12/92 and 01/93-06/93 Accounts Payable Cash Disbursement Journals and the 1990 Accounting System Implementation G/L Reports (Retention Code 40103). These records have been imaged in the City's LaserFiche Imaging System. The imaging of these records complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. APPROVED: Department Head: t~e ~~t s :~F_ i~n~~r tment Dat~/ ~t APPROVED: City Attorney: Pett:~l~rs°n~, D~e' ' ' / R:\Hores\destr.req "EXHIBIT A" 1/5/1998 City Of Temecula Page: 1 11:02 am Clerks Index for Windows Destruction File Report Ret. Code .... : 40103 GENER;tL LEDGER FILE Dest. Date...: 1/13/1998 DOC. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brie~ Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 140 1/1/1994 APIN'V FY94/95 A-N A/P Invoices 40106 LF Imaging System 40106 LaserFiche Imaging System 401-06 A/9 Invoices .............................. ~r~up iV. .......... ~a~e~F~c~e_ I_ma~igg_ syspe? ................ 140 1/1/1990 GLIMP 90 Implementation G/L Reports 40103 LF Imaging System LF Imaging System 401-03 Imaging Group IV LF Imaging System 140 1/1/1992 GLRPT 92/93 G/L Detail Report 40103 LF Imaging System 40103 LF Imaging System 401-03 G/L Files Group IV LF Imaging System 140 7/1/1992 APDJ 07/92-06/93 A/P Cash Disbursement Journ.40103 LF Imaging System LF Imaging System 401-03 Imaging Group IV LF Imaging System User ID: RECORDS ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~ CITY MANAGER ~ II CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 13, 1998 Release Traffic Signalization Mitigation Security in Tract No. 24133-2. (Easterly of the intersection of Santiago Road at Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: ~)l~Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Albert K. Crisp~ Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation Security in Tract No 24133-2, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On March 27, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 24133-2, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation, for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were Instruments of Credit posted by Butterfield Financial Corporation in the following amounts: · $1,296,500 ($899,000, ~134,500, and $263,000, respectively) to cover faithful performance for streets, drainage, water and sewer improvements. e ~648,000 ($449,500, $67,000, and t131,500, respectively) to cover labor and materials for streets, drainage, water and sewer improvements. 3. $30,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. 4. ~16,650 to cover traffic signalization mitigation fees. On August 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the p'Ublic improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized reduction in the Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent (10%) warranty level. R:~GDRPI~98~0113\TR241332.TSM The developer submitted substitute bonds in the appropriate amounts, with The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as surety. On October 28, 1997, the City Council authorized the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials securities. , ~ The developer has requested the release of the Traffic Signalization Mitigation security. All such fees having been paid, Staff recommends the release of the following security: Instrument of Credit-Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees in the amount of $16,650 The affected streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 96-102. The streets within the subdivision accepted were Via Denzo, Via Caro, Corte Priego, Via Barraza, Corte Pollensa/Calle Novelda, and a portion of Amarita Way. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map R:~,GDRlVI%98\0113\TR241332.TSM TO AN D~EGQ VICINITY MAP !0 Rc)AO - 114 AREA, ?. ?4 ACREs ,~/ ACREs, NOTE: Maps not to ~,cale ITEM 10 FINANCE DIRECT(~~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager (~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 13, 1998 SUBJECT: Reduce Faithful Performance Security Amount in Parcel Map No. 24085- 1. (Northwesterly corner of the Intersection of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive (Avenida de Ventas) PREPARED BY: ~/~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development .~' Larry D. Cooley, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE fifty-percent (50%) reduction in Faithful Performance Security amount for street improvements in Parcel Map 24085-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On November 12, 1996, the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 24085-1. Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Securities were submitted by: Westside Business Centre, LLC 41975 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92590, for the improvement of streets. Accompanying the agreement were securities posted by Scripps Bank as follows: Faithful Performance Instrument of Credit in the amount of $193,000. Labor and Materials Instrument of Credit in the amount of $96,500. Subdivision Monument Cash Deposit in the amount of $2,000. The developer requested reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to reflect work performed. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement permits a maximum of fifty-percent (50%) reduction in Faithful Performance security amount. This provision requires that sufficient security remains to affect completion of the remaining work. Staff also retains sufficient reserve to assure that the ten-percent (10%) warranty amount is available. Public Works Staff has determined that both requirements have been met and therefore recommends that the requested reduction in security be authorized as follows: R:~AGDRF~98\0113~24085-1.RED Reduction in Faithful Performance Security Amount $96,500 The security amount remaining for construction and warranty purposes is as follows: Faithful Performance Security for street improvements. $96,500 The Labor and Materials security will remain in place until the City Council accepts the public street improvements, initiates the one-year warranty period, the contractual six-month lien period runs, and the City Council authorizes release of this security. The subdivision monumentation security will be recommended for release when the public street improvements have been constructed and the survey monuments and related documents have been approved by Staff. The public streets within this development, although not completed, and therefore not ready to be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System, are portions of Diaz Road and Zevo Drive. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachmsqt: Location Map R:~.GDRPT~98\0113~24085-1.RED NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO!~~, CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ~/~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 13, 1998 Emergency Expenditure PREPARED BY: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ratify the emergency expenditure of $30,543.00 to Monteleone Excavating for the following unforseen Public Works repairs that emerged as a result of heavy rains on 12/6/97 and 12/7/97: , 2. 3. 4. Removal of silt and debris from the Santiago Desilting Ponds. Reconstruction of the Santiago Desilting Ponds. Cleaning of the Jedediah Smith Channel. Cleaning of the Via Lobo Channel BACKGROUND: These repairs were required due to the threat of another storm in the next three days. At the present time, Monteleone Excavating is the low bidder on time and materials sheet and had the necessary equipment available to perform the work required. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Drainage Facilities Maintenance Account #001-164-601- 5401. r:\agdrpt\98\O 113\emergexp.wpd\122397\me ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY I'~? II F'NANCE DIRECTO~~ II CITY MANAGER II CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 13, 1998 Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities - West Side of Margarita Road - Solana Way to North General Kearny Road, Project No. PW97-07. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize expenditure of an estimated $150,000.00 to underground the overhead facilities on the west side of Margarita Road from Solana Way to North General Kearny Road, Project No. PW97-07. BACKGROUND: City Council approved an expenditure or $470,000.00 of Rule 20-A funds to underground the facilities along the frontage of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road. All of the funds allocated to the City ($470,000.00) pursuant to Rule 20-A will be needed to complete this project. Other overhead facilities in this area were on North General Kearny Road, along the frontage of Campos Verde property. Recently the developer paid for having those facilities undergrounded. Additional overhead facilities exist on the west side of Margarita Road between North General Kearny Road and Solana Way. By undergrounding these facilities, all of the overhead facilities along Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and on Margarita Road between Winchester Road and Solana Way will be underground and the existing poles will be removed. The widening of Margarita Road is proposed as part of the approved 1997-1998 CIP Budget. We requested Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to provide us with the cost estimate to accomplish the undergrounding. Based on their estimate, the cost is $137,800.00. With approximately 10% in contingencies, the total is estimated not to exceed $150,000 for undergrounding 3,425 feet of the SCE facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds for that portion of the work as described, are available in Account No. 210- 165-681-5804. r:\agdrpt\98\0113\underagn.\me ITEM 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 13, 1998 Amendment No. 1 to Appraisal Contract Related to Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) 1997 Series Bonds RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment No. I to an Agreement with Bruce W. Hull & Associates, Inc. for an appraisal of certain properties within CFD 88-12 for an amount of $4,000. BACKGROUND: On September 23, 1997, the City Council approved an agreement with Bruce W. Hull & Associates, Inc. to perform the appraisal of certain properties within the CFD 88-12 to determine current property values and the resulting property value to debt ratio for the CFD Phase II bond issuance. Bruce W. Hull & Associates performed the recommended appraisal and has since been requested by staff to update the appraisal to reflect a current date of value (December 15, 1997). As a result they will be completing additional tasks of: 1) Reviewing additional market transactions that may have occurred since September 1997 date of value; 2) Reviewing undeveloped parcels to determine if any changes have occurred; and 3) Interviewing representatives of Campos Verdes and Forest City to determine the current status of these two specific plans. The additional tasks exceed the original agreement amount of $25,000. Bruce W. Hull & Associates believes the additional tasks should not exceed an additional $4,000. The amended contract appraisal amount would then be $29,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of of this amendment will be reimbursed by CFD 88-12. Attachments: Bruce W. Hull & Associates Amendment No. I to Appraisal Agreement R: INOR TONL [AGENDA St CFDA PA O. A ON 0.9/15/9 7 REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS December 22, 1997 Ms. Genie Roberts City Finance Director city of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Reference: Community Facilities District No. 88-12 City of Temecula Dear Ms. Roberts: Please find attached an invoice for $12,500 which represents 50% of the original appraisal fee on the above referenced project. Also I have been requested to update my appraisal report to reflect a more current date of value - December 15, 1997. As a result, I will be completing the following additional tasks. 1) A review of any additional'market transactions that may have occurred since the September, 1997 date of value. 2) '.A review of the parcels addressed in Section I (the undeveloped lands which were appraised) of the report. This would be to determine if there has been any significant changes relating to these properties (e.g. buildings under construction, grading, etc.) 3) An interview with representatives of Campos Verdes and Forest City to determine the current status of these two specific plans. Based on the above, I am requesting my original contract be amended to provide for these additional tasks. I believe the time involved to complete these tasks should not exceed $4,000 in appraisal fees. Therefore, the contract would be as follows. Original Appraisal Fee: Additional Tasks: $25,000 $ 4,000 /Mnended Appraisal Contract: $29,000 Respectfully submitted, Bruce W. Hull, MAI INC. 138 W. Main Street · Suite E · Ventura, California 93001 · (805) 641-3275 · FAX (805) 641-3278 ITEM 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINAN CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Peter Thorson, City Attorney January 13, 1998 Community Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) Initiation of Actions Necessary to Foreclosure Delinquent Special Tax Liens RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1997, the City of Temecula became the governing entity for CFD 88-12 which was originally established in 1988 by the County of Riverside for improvements on Ynez Road. Bonds were issued by the CFD in 1992 in order to fund the improvements and were to be repaid through parcelized special taxes. Such taxes were to be collected in bi-annual installments and were placed on the County's tax roll rather than being hand-billed. However, as a result of property owners' failure to pay the special taxes, the properties with the following parcel numbers within CFD 88-12 became delinquent: 921300013-1; 921680014-7; 921730004-2; 921730005-3; 921730006-4; 921730007-5; 921730008-6; 921730009-7; 921730010-7; 921730011-8; 921730012-9; 921730013-0; 921730014-1; 921730015-2; 921730017-4; 944330001-0; 944330002-1; 944330003-2; 944330004-3; 944330005-4; and 944330007-6. R: INOR TONL i,4 GENDA $l CFD TAX. A ON As of September 1997, the delinquencies on these parcels exceeded $313,000. The City will receive an updated report on the delinquencies in late January 1998. As the governing body of CFD 88-12, the City of Temecula is obligated to foreclose upon the delinquent parcels pursuant to its responsibilities under the bond indentures. In order for the City to proceed with its foreclosure action, it must first seek to Ustrip" the existing delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. In order to achieve this, the City Council must adopt a resolution which strips the delinquencies from the County's tax rolls. Subsequently, the City must file a Notice of Stripping which effectively relieves the County Tax Collector from further responsibility in the collection and/or foreclosure upon the delinquent parcels. The goal of the actions is to obtain payment of the special taxes due along with interest, penalties and costs of collection. Property owners will be given every opportunity to pay the amounts due, but the City must formally proceed with the foreclosure actions. FISCAL IMPACT: The delinquencies on these parcels exceeds $313,000 and will be used to satisfy the debt service requirement on the outstanding bonds. Attachments: R: tNOR TO NL IA GENDA St CFD TAX. A ON RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW; ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. The County of Riverside, California, did previously undertake proceedings to and did establish a community facilities district pursuam to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (hereinafter "Mello-Roos Act"), as codified, Governmere Code section 53311, et seq.; and B. The County of Riverside did previously issue special tax bonds pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Mello-Roos Act to finance public improvements; and C. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, the timely collection of the special tax installments are necessary for the timely payment of all principal and interest on the special tax bond and each special tax levy thereof and interest and penalties thereon constitute liens against the lots and parcels of land against which they are made, umil the same are paid; and D. Certain special taxes have not been paid when due, and certain special taxes may not be paid in the future; and E. The County of Riverside has covenanted with the owners of the special tax bonds to commence and diligently pursue foreclosure actions against those parcels of land subject to the delinquent payment of special taxes; and F. The City of Temecula, as successor-in-interest to the County of Riverside, desires to assume the duty of the County of Riverside Tax Collector in collecting upon the existing delinquencies in Community Facilities District No. 88-12; and R:\resos\delinq G. Under the provisions of under the provisions of Section 8834 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City Council is authorized, at any time prior to the expiration of four years subsequent to the last maturity of the principal of bonds secured by assessment or reassessment, to order the same to be collected by an action brought in the Superior Court to foreclose the liens of the delinquent special taxes; and H. Under the provisions of Section 8833 of the California Streets and Highways Code, when such foreclosure actions are ordered, the county tax collector is to be credited upon the current tax roll with the amount charged against the tax collector on account of the delinquent special taxes to be sued on and to be relieved of further duty in regard thereto and a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll is to be recorded with the county recorder's office in the county in which the real property is located. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby orders that the delinquent payments of special taxes for CFD 88-12 with respect to those parcels identified on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and all subsequent delinquent special taxes with respect to those parcels which are not paid when due, be collected by action brought in the Superior Court of Riverside to foreclose the liens thereof. Section 3. The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to institute such actions in the name of the City to foreclose the liens of all such delinquent special taxes. Section 4. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and cause to be recorded with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a Notice of Intent to Remove Delinquent Special Tax Installments from the Tax Roll. Section 5. The City Clerk, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Auditor/Controller's office of the County of Riverside together with such other documents and the payment of such fees as is necessary or appropriate to credit the County of Riverside Tax Collector upon the tax roll with the amounts charged against the Tax Collector on account of the delinquent special tax installments to be sued upon and to relieve the Tax Collector of further duty in regards thereto. Section 6. The City Manager, in cooperation and in conjunction with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to take such further actions as may be necessary or convenient to recover the special taxes due from the properties and to prosecute the foreclosure actions. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:\resos\delinq PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula on January 13, 1998. Ronald Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on January 13, 1998, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\resos\delinq TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DECEMBER 9, 1997 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District meeting was called to order at 7:42 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, and Stone. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, City Clerk Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Director Lindemans moved for the approval of Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. , Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Rancho California Sports Park Sidewalk Pro!ect {Project No, PW ~)7-16CSD) 1.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW97-16CSD, Rancho California Sports Park Sidewalk Project. Amendment No. Two to Consultant Aoreement for Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Service~ 2.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 for $10,000 with the Elliott Group for Landscape plan check and inspection services. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. Minut¢s.CSD\120997 1 Temecula Community Services District GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT 120997 General Manager Bradley briefly commented on the success of the Christmas Parade as well as the City's first official Tree Lighting Ceremony and thanked everyone for their participation. BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S REPORTS None given, ADJOURNMENT At 7:44 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary Minutes.CSD\120997 2 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DECEMBER 16, 1997 CALL TO ORDER An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:26 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ,5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, and Stone. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, City Clerk Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Director Lindemans moved for the approval of Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Director Comerchero who abstained with regard to 1.1. 1. Approval of Minutes . 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 18, 1997 1.2 Approve the minutes of November 25, 1997 Swim Team Agreemerit . 2.1 Approve an agreement between the City of Temecula Community Services Department and the Temecula Triton Swim Team, for use of the Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool. Award Contract for TCSD Tree Trimming Services 3.1 Award a contract of $24,330 to California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. to provide tree trimming services for various stop, park and median maintenance areas. Minutes. CSD\ 121697 1 Temecula Community Services District 121697 DISTRICT BUSINESS 4. Certify the Results of Election - TCSD Rates and Charges for Tract No. 28309 {Regency Homes) 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON DECEMBER 12, 1997, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW City Clerk Greek reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). MOTION; Director Ford moved to adopt Resolution No. CSD 97-17. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Referencing recent Holiday events throughout the City, Director Nelson individually thanked Mayor Roberts, Director Comerchero, and Director Stone for judging the Holiday Lighting Contest, noting that the City had received 23 entries. Director Stone thanked Community Services Director Nelson, his staff, and the Police Department for another successful Christmas Parade and commended those residents who participated in the Holiday Lighting Contest on a job well done. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S REPORT.C; None given. Minutes. CSD\121697 2 Temecula Community Services District 121697 ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary Minutes. CSD\ 121697 3 ITEM 2 Jl II CITY ATTORNEY II DIR. OF FINANCE i1cITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: General Manager/Board of Directors Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 13, 1998 Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30,1997. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Community Services District for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997. Please see the attached financial statements for the analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temeeula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets and other debits: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Total assets Parks & Recreation $ 603,832 159,509 26,021 $ 789,362 Service Level A Service Level B $ 397 397 $ Service Level C 188,118 3,693 191,811 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances 183,551 183,551 485,289 120,522 605,811 789,362 $ 21,967 18,239 40,206 7,724 (47,930) (40,206) 4,054 24,117 28,171 (27,774) (27,774) 397 $ 36,303 36,303 182,732 (27,224) 155,508 $ 191,811 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets and other debits: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Total assets Service Level D Service Level R Debt Service Total $ 236,243 $ 13,680 4,907 168 $ 241,150 $ 13,848 860,590 8,633 869,223 $ 1,902,463 177,307 26,021 $ 2,105,791 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated $ 1,712 $ 1,520 1,712 239,438 1,520 12,328 502,690 366,533 $ 26,021 265,442 291,463 1,178,435 635,893 Total fund balances 239,438 12,328 869,223 1,814,328 $ 869,223 $ 241,150 $ 13,84~8 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 2,105,791 Please note that these balances are unaudited Tem~ula Commuifity Serv~c.~ District Parks and Rocreation Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balanc~ - Budget and Actual For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Total Budset Aotivity Enoumbr. A~tivi~ Special tax TCSD admin fee creditSREST' Recreation ~ Investment interest Miscellaneous 2,440,390 572,770 381,300 24,000 46,710 15,500 $ 143,193 $ 143,193 162,058 162,058 13,117 13,117 370 370 Total Revenues 3~480~670 318~738 318~738 Expenditures: Parks and r~xeation Seniors Community Reoreation Center (CRC) Rooroation programs Temecula Commtmity Center (TCC) 2,765,986 898,869 $ 296,325 1,195,194 89,880 21,396 9,463 30,859 344,250 76,050 31,313 107,363 424,863 125,110 16,917 142,027 130~300 24~971 8~971 33~942 Total Expenditures 3 ~755~279 1 ~ 1 46~396 362,989 1,509,385 Revenues Over/(Under) Expertdittoes (274,609) (827,659) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 1~433~469 1~433~469 Ending Fund Balanoe, September30, 1997 $ lr158r860 $ 605~811 Percent of Budget 25% 43% 55% 1% 9% 43% 34% 31% 33% 26% 40% (1) (~) NOTES: (1) Special taxes are not rec~ved until January each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to encumbrances recorded for landscape maintmance contracts for the entire fiscal year. Temeeula Community Services District ~'vic~ L~vel A Arterial Strut Lights and Median Maint~_anc~ Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Chan~es in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For thc Thrcc Months Ended 8eptem~ 30, 1997 Revenues .' Special tax Investment interest TCSD admin fee creditREST* Total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries and wages Street lighting Other operating expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues Over/CUnder) Expenditures Be~nning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ Annual Amended YTD Total Budset ActiviW Enmambr. Activity 191,580 1,800 13,120 $ 3,280 $ 3,280 1~:800 3~546 3,546 208~300 6~826 6,826 2,790 726 726 175,000 57,087 57,087 20,447 3,408 $ 7,724 11,132 lot500 2~233 2~233 208/737 63~454 7,724 71,178 (437) (56,628) 16~422 16~422 15t985 $ (40~206~) Perc~-nt of Buyer 25% 197% 3% 26% 33% 54% 21% 34% (1) (1) Speoial taxes are not received until January each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to encumbrances recorded for landscape maintenance contracts for the entire fiscal year. Temeeula Community Services District Service Level B Residential Street Lights Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Assessments Investment interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries and wages Street lighting Miscellaneous Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 267,690 2,550 $ 397 15,810 2,979 286,050 3,376 7,230 1,627 296,270 95,238 4,500 308,000 96,865 (21,950) (93,489) 65,715 65,715 43,765 $ (27,774) Encumbr. Total Activity Percent of Budget $ 397 16% 2,979 19% 3,376 1,627 95,238 (1) Assessments are not received until January each fiscal year. 96,865 1% 23% 32% 31% (1) Temecula Community Services District Service Level C Pcrim©tcr Iamdacaping and Slope lVlaintcmncc Statement of Revenues, Expenditures mad Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Aetml For the Thr~ Months Ended 8~temb~r 30, 1997 Revenues: Assessments $ Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Salaries and wages Utilities O~hcr expend~k~rcs Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Besinning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ Annual Amended YTD Total Budget Aofivity Eneumbr. Activity 557,460 9,000 $ 3,693 $ 3,693 5,000 1,855 1,855 571,460 5,548 5,548 98,920 23,136 23,136 289,480 63,609 $ 182,732 246,341 135,300 47,667 47,667 76,120 14~196 14,196 599~820 148~608 1821732 331,340 (28,360) (143,060) 298,568 298,568 270r208 $ 155r508 Percent of Budget 41% 37% 1% 23% 85% 35% 19% 55% (1) (1) Assessments are not received until January each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to encumbrances recorded for landscape maintenance contracts for the entire fiscal year. Temeeula Community Services District Service Level D Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Revenues: Assessments $ 1,996,330 TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 48,170 $ 12,043 Investment interest 8,000 4,907 Miscellaneous Total Revenues 2,052,500 16,950 Expenditures: Salaries and wages 43,170 8,677 Refuse hauling 2,072,950 1,800 Other expenditures 8,910 2,603 Total Expenditures 2,125,030 13,080 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (72,530) 3,870 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 235,568 235,568 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 163,038 $ 239,438 Encumbr. Total Activity $ 12,043 4,907 16,950 8,677 1,800 2,603 13,080 Percent of Budget (1) 25% 61% 1% 20% 0% (2) 29% 1% (1) Assessments are not received until January each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to refuse hauling payments being made in December and June of each fiscal year. Temeeula Community Services District Service Level R Streets and Roads Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activita/ Revenues: Assessments $ TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" Investment interest Total Revenues 19,210 Expenditures: Emergency street maintenance 16,140 Other expenditures 3,080 Total Expenditures 19,220 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (10) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 12,930 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 16,140 3,000 $ 70 12,920 $ (1) Assessments are not received until January each fiscal year. 75O 168 918 1,520 1,520 (602) 12,930 12,328 Encumbr. Total Activity Percent of Budget $ 750 25% 168 240% 918 1,520 1,520 5% 9% 8% (1) Temecula Community Services District Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Operating transfers in Investment interest Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Consulting services Trustee admin fees Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ Annual Amended Total Budset Activity 501,320 $ 322,786 34,000 17,417 535,320 340,203 180,000 316,320 500 4,500 501,320 34,000 340,203 529,020 529,020 563,020 $ 869,223 Percent of Budset 64% 51% 64% (1) Debt service payments are made in October and April each fiscal year. (1) (1) ITEM 3 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~E~ CITY MANAG~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager January 13, 1998 Release of Landscape Bond - Tract 23125-3 (De Portola Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY: ~ ~.,Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: I . Authorize the release of the Parkland\Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for Tract No. 23125-3 - Kaufman & Broad of San Diego, Inc. 2. Direct the Secretary/City Clerk to notify the Developer and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On January 24, 1995, the Board of Directors entered into a Parkland/Landscape Agreement with: Kaufman & Broad of San Diego, Inc. 12626 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92130 for the improvement of perimeter slope and landscape areas within Tract No. 23125-3. The slopes were accepted into the TCSD landscape maintenance program beginning FY 1997-98, and the Faithful Performance Bond was subsequently reduced to a one year warranty amount of $10,550 by the Board of Directors on July 8, 1997. The remaining surety bonds, issued by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and the American Insurance Company, are as follows: · AMCAS Labor and Materials Bond No. 137714384 in the amount of $26,500. AIC Labor and Materials Bond No. 11133167111 in the amount of $26,500. 1 AMCAS Warranty Bond No. 137714384 in the amount of $5,275. AIC Warranty Bond No. 11133167111 in the amount of $5,275. Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be released six months after completion and acceptance of the landscaping, pending the settlement of any claims or obligations by the developer· No claims have been filed with the City by persons providing labor or materials for the construction and installation of the landscape improvements. r:\yasinobk\23125-3 .l~m 011398 Therefore, staff is recommending the exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for these improvements. The remaining Warranty Bond, in the amount of $10,550 shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Labor and Materials Bond. r:\ynsinobk\23125-3.1~m 011398 BOND NO. 137714384 - AMCAS ~ OF T~CLTLA 11133167111 - AIC PREMIUM INCLUDED IN PERFORMANCE BOND PARK3_kND/LANDSCAPE LABOR A/qI) M. ATERLq/~ BOND WI-T~R.EAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and [<aufman and 8road o1: Sa~ Diego, ~nc;, (h~rema.Rer designated as "Principal") have entered into an Agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain P~kland Improvements, which said Agreement, dated January 24, .., 19 95.., and identified as Project Parkway in Tract 23125:._3... , is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and Wt~-KEAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and ....... **AMERICAN CASUALTY' COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA AND THE AMERICAN~oNSURANCE COMPANY NOW, TI-I'h'~R'7~ORE, we the principal and ** as S'tff~ty, are held and fzrmly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the afore.~d Agreement and referred to in Tifie 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of $ s3,o.o.o ..., lawful money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount set forth. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incun'exi by City in successfuRy enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed co~ts and' includ~ in any judgement rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond ahall in~ur¢ to the benefit of any and all persore, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to ~ve a fight of action to them or theix a~signa in any suit brought upon this bond. If the condition of. this bond is fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the A=o'reement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WI-~-REOF, this instrument has been' duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on December 27 , 19 9a.. (Seal) ~TY COMPANY OF PAMELA L. JA ATTORNEY- IN-~~) P AM~Li-L./sTOCKs ATTORNEY-IN-FACT KAUFI~, A~ B_~~~ SA~NzDIEG~,~I~C. Vice President By: Robert Mincer Assistant Secrg, tary APPROVe. r) AS TO FOR1Vi: Peter Thorson City Attorney A C' } STATE OF CALIFORNIA }ss. COUNTY OF San Diego } On December 28, 1994 , before me, Rosa C. Brown , personally appeared John FulbriKht and Robert Mincer (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) i~are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~/they executed the same in ~ttr/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by JaJ~Jc~er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my~nd. officia, I seal~~.~ Signatu r ~_--~. ,~_~_.,L~)~~~(~~..~~ ~'~/'[. (This area for official notarial seal) Title of Document City of Temecula Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond Date of Document No. of Pages 7 Other signatures not acknowledged NON~. 3008 11-94) (Oeneral'~ A~nerl¢_a_n Ca_sualty Company o! Re. cling, Penna¥1vanla I~' At1 the ('mmmlta,~af4 ~ M&Jtf' OfilcesJ~hl~ge, Ironpie) POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ICnow All Men b; these P;esenll, 1~41 AMERICAN CASUALTY C~PAHY Of RGADING. PENNSYLVANIA. l COrpOrdl,Qn du~ O~r~E~ IncJ Stote~m~.~she,e~ko.~st4~eo~op~_ ~eafi L.. ~t11.cox, ~esley R. Oowne~, Pamela L. Jacob~, Larry G. O'Donne11. Individually Los AngeJe"s; California ~her O~,l~t~ifistrumefitl ~ S~ibr ~tvre- . ln'Onltmtted"'~unts --" "~' lnd to bind AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING. FINNSYLVANIA thereby ol ful¥o~d to'th~ tame extent aS if Such instruments s,l~,<l ~ the dvf/ puSh.,zeal Off<ors el AMERICAN C~UAL~ ~MP~ OF READING. ~NNSYLV~IA ~ a~ the ~ct~ ~ ~ ~rsuant tO the Out~ hereby liven ~t here~ r~tifi~ ~ ~fir~. The Power ~ Attomet ,S ~de 6~ ex.ut~ pursuant tO 1~ by out~ity of the fol~wiAl Or-Low Ou~ o~pted by the ~;d ~ O~.t~s the ~n~ "~tlc~ W-[.cullart of Obfilaf/o~s and Appdnfmenl of AII~nq.IA-FKI ~ 2. ~,ntmefit of Att~r.m.f~ct. The Pros,dent ~ Yct PrEsMe~t ~y. fr~ t~me tO tame. o.~nt ~ written ce~&f~t~ in-fd~ to oct m ~hoH Of the ~n; m the exKut~n ~ ~f~s d ~suri~e. ~S. u~e~akinsS ~ ~her oM~fot~ mstru~nts ~ ~ture ~h ott~fieys.m.f~. ~ub~ to the km6tot~S ~t ~h m t~ resttwO ce~,f~tes d Out~dr, shoff hove furl ~wer to ~ the ~n1 ~ theK StScSure O~ exK~ d Oar S~ inStrumentS ~ to attoCh the ~1 ~ t~ ~r t~reto. The Pros~ent ~ OAF V~ Present ~ the ~rd of Otrec1~S ~ of on~ t,~ tenke off ~er o~ I~ify prev~s~ 8wen to an~ Th4 ~r d Att~ ~ s~d 4~ ~o~ ~ bcsom*~ v~er O~ ~ t~ out~y d the ~w,~ Re~ o~tff ~ t~ ~rd ~r~t~s d t~ ~ny it ~ ~et.~ d~ ~ o~ he~ ~ the 1 lth ~y d ~vem~r. *~e~vff. that t~ t,~tvre ~ the Prestone ~ O V~e Present i~ the ~ol of the ~ny ~y ~ Iff~xed ~ hOStile ~ i~ d att~r 4ranted putsulna to ~ 2 d ~K~ ~ d the Or. Laws. o~ the siX.Sure ~ the ~ret~rr ~ Off As~stant ~rol~ O~ the o~ ~o~d shift. Mth reset tO o~ ~ ~ u~ldt~ tO ~ d 4 OttoChq. ~fiti~ tO ~ volM O~ ~inI ~ I~ ~~." In .fn,,S Wh.,.o,..ERICAN C.UAL-- COMP~, READ,NG. PENNSYLV~IAA.s .us. the. p,..nt, 10 ~ ,i,~ ~ ~ PresSertl a~ ds c~ote ~af to ~ he;eta aff,.d th,S_ . ~ . ~; ~: ~ep~emDer AMERICAN CASU~ ~MP~Y OF READING. P[NNSYLV~IA Courier of C~k t st _ _ ~. [. Puffell V~e ~ lb4 6th d, ~ ~eotember . lo~. b~. me ~,~ ume a V~e-Presdenl ~ ~ERIC~ ~UAL~ ~MP~Y ~ ~ADING. FINNSYLV~IA. the c~al~ ~e~r,~ m IM ~h en.ul~ Ihe restruant. that ~ k~ws the ~al ~ ~d ~at~: that the ~al off,x~ to t~ ~ instrument ~ s~h ~at, ~of. t~t 4 was ~ aft, Keri ~rsuoot ~ out~y (ive~ ~ the ~,d ~ O~.t~s of u~ ~ot~ a~ t~t he si8~d h,s ~ thereto ~rsuant to ~k, o~,tr. ock~les ~ to ~ the oct o~ deed ~ ~d ~ot~ OCE:RTIFIC:ATE Id.,Y Coralssion £xptres Hov er 12, 1990' CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 State of California County of Los Angeles December 27, 1994 On DATE before me, Ruth L. Yates NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared Pamela L. Jacobs , NAME(S) OF SiGNER(S) ~ personally known to me - OR - I--] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)is~ subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that Ixe/she~ executed the same in x,t~s/her/t~_'Jrr authorized capacity(ies), and that bY xJ~/he~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WI~S my hand and official seal. (.,/' L~ ' ' '~~'TURE OF NOTARY ' OPTIONAL "' Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE(S) r-~ PARTNER(S) ~ LIMITED ~ GENERAL ~r] A'I-i'ORNEY-IN-FACT E~ TRUSTEE(S) [~ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ~ OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) AMERICAN CASUALTY COMP~ OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 ' GENERAL POWE.t{ OF x'rronN~¥ THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY KNOW' ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation incorporated under the laws of ihc State New Jersey on February 20, 1846, and redomesticated to the State of Nebraska on June 1. 1990. and having its principal office in the City of Omaha. State Nebraska. has made, constituted and appointed, ahd does by these presents make. constitule and appoim --- PAHELA L. STOCKS --- PASADENA CA its true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, p~ace and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertaking, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof and to bind the Corporation thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seal of the Corporation and duly attested by its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s)-in-Fact may do in the premises. T~is power of attorney is granted pursuant to Article VII, Sections 45 and 46 of By-laws of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY now in full force and effect. "Article V H. Appointment and A nthodty of Resident Secretaries, A ttor~ej~-in-Fact and Agents to accept Legal Proce~ and Make Appe~rnnee~. Section 45. Appointment. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice-President or any other person authorized by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Vice-President may, from time to time. appoint Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys-in-Fact to represent and act for and on behalf of the Corporation and Agents to accept legal process and make appearances for and on behalf of the Corporation. Section 46. Arithoflay. The authority of such Resident Assistant Secretaries, Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents shall be as prescribed in the instrument evidencing their appointment. Any such appointment and all authority granted thereby may be revoked at any time by the Board of Directors or by any person empowered to make such appointment:' This power of attorney is signed and sealed under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Bo~d of Directors of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA~IY at a meeting duly called and held on the 31 st day of July, 1984, and ~ai~i Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident A.~istant Secretary of this Corporation, and the seal of this Corporation may bc affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile ~al shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation'.' IN WITNESS WHEREOR THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice-President, and its corporate seal to August: ....... 19 94.. be hereunto aftr~xed this 1 5 t h day of _--:",:;~;.;; .... +~ ,~,1, ,, By STATE OF CALIFORNIA } as. COUNTY OF MARIN THF AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY M. A. Mallonee On titis ~ day of A ,~ o t, ~ r , 19 9 A , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly s'~vorn, did depose and say: that he is Vice-President of TIIE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the Corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of said Corporation; that the seal afrtxed to the said instrument is such corporate .~d; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said Corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, fhe day and yem' herein first above written. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL A. KRIEGER Nota~/Public-- CaJifornla MARIN COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MARIN CERTIIqCATE l, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a NEBRASKA Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore tha! Article VII, Seelions 45 and 46 of ~ he By-laws of the Corporation, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Allorney, are now in force. 27th Signed and sealed at the County of Marin. Dated the .~ day of December 199/4. Resident A~sistat~t Secr~a~/ 360711 -TA-8-93 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 State of California County of Los Angeles December 27, 1994 On DATE before me, Ruth L. Yates NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER -E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared PameLa L. Stocks , NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ~ personally known to me - OR - l'-"1 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)is/~ subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that j~/she/~ executed the same in :~s/her~z authorized capacity(ies), and that by~her/f,J~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. c/ u,~ ~-'- .-' ~J;~A~URE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL "' ' Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER I--'J INDIVIDUAL r-~ CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) TITLE(S) ~ LIMITED [] GENERAL GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave,, P.O. Box 7184 o Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 ITEM 4 APPRO L CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager January 13, 1998 Proposed Residential Street Lighting Fee - Tract No. 25892 eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 1998 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TRACT NO. 25892 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION . , Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of the Ballots. Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the aforementioned process. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting services to numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through "Service Level B". Pursuant to the request of the property owners, staff has initiated proceedings to assume the responsibility for long-term residential street lighting services within Tract No. 25892 beginning Fiscal Year 1998-99. On November 25, 1997, and in accordance with Proposition 218, the Board of Directors adopted the ~esolution of intention to file the levy report for all 32 residential parcels within Tract No. 25892. The Notice of Public Hearing was subsequently mailed to the property owners identifying the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as follows: Service Level B ,~25.68 per parcel R:\yasinobk\election\25892olo.b&e 011398 At tonight's Public Hearing, the Board of Directors must hear and consider all objections or protests to the levy report for Tract No. 25892 and the proposed rates and charges. If a written protest is presented by the property owners, the Board must reject the proposed fee and abandon any further proceedings. In this instance, the homeowners' association would need to assume the street lighting responsibilities. However, if the property owners do not submit a written protest against the proposed rates and charges, the Board of Directors may then adopt the proposed fee subject to an election requiring a majority approval of the affected property owners. In this instance, the Board of Directors can order and call an election for March 2, 1998 and authorize staff to proceed with mailing a notice and ballot to the property owners of Tract No. 25892, a copy of which is attached for your review. Pursuant to the ballot process, staff is also recommending the approval of the attached Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. The ballot procedure explains the process for completion, return and tabulation of the ballots and will be included as part of the mailed ballot documents. The ballot can only be completed by the property owner of each parcel. In order to be counted, the ballot must be completed in compliance with these procedures and returned to the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998. The ballot will be opened by the City Clerk/District Secretary on March 2, 1998 at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference Room in City Hall. The results of the election shall be announced by the City Clerk/District Secretary at the Community Services District meeting on March 10, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: In the event that the Board of Directors calls for an election, staff will prepare the notices, ballot and election procedures in-house. The property owners of Tract No. 25892 have paid a $200 application fee to cover administrative and mailing costs associated with the public notices and ballot information required per Proposition 218. If approved by the property owners, beginning Fiscal Year 1998-99, the proposed levy of $25.68 per parcel for Service Level B will generate $821.76 annually for residential street lighting services within the subdivision. Sufficient funds will be generated to cover the costs of providing residential street lighting services. ATTACHMENTS: , Resolution Calling and Noticing the Election. Notice and Ballot Form. Procedures for Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. R:\yasinobk\elecfion\25892ele.b&c 011398 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 2, 1998 FOR PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN TRACT NO. 25892 TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution, there is hereby called and ordered to be held on March 2, 1998 an election for the purpose of obtaining approval by property owners of Tract No. 25892 in the City of Temecula to establish Service Level B Rates and Charges beginning Fiscal Year 1998-99. Section 2. The notice and ballot to be submitted to the property owners shall be substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Procedures for the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots ("Ballot Procedures") presented to the Board at this meeting and directs such procedures be placed on file in the office of the Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District and open to public inspection. Section 3. All ballots must be received by the Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District no later than 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided in the Ballot Procedures. Section 4. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The officers and staff of the Temecula Community Services District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District this 13th day of January, 1998. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 98- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following vote of the Board of Directors. AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: r:\yasinobk\eleetionL25892ele.res 102897 EXHIBIT "A" NOTICE OF ELECTION PROPOSED SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 25892 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 Pursuant to the request of the property owners of Tract No. 25892, the Temecula Community Services District has initiated proceedings to assume maintenance of residential street lighting within Tract No. 25892, beginning with the Fiscal Year 1998/99. Pursuant to this request, and pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description of each parcel of property to be charged for this maintenance and the proposed amount of the maintenance charge for each parcel for Fiscal Year 1998-99. The proposed Service Level B rate and charge against each of the 32 parcels withing Tract No. 25892 beginning Fiscal Year 1998-99 is $25.68. The proposed levy rate of $25.68 per parcel provides revenue for residential street lighting services within this subdivision. This amount was calculated by dividing the total estimated maintenance cost for Fiscal year 1998-99 ($821.76) by the total number of parcels in this subdivision. On January 13, 1998, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report and the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard and considered all objections or protests to the Report and to the proposed rates and charges. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board determined that written protests against the proposed fee were presented by less than a majority of owners of the parcels on which the proposed fee is to be imposed, and levied the rates and charges subject to approval by the property owners subject to the proposed rates and charges. The Board of Directors encourages you to return the enclosed ballot indicating whether you support or oppose the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 no later than 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998. The proposed Service Level B rates and charges will be abandoned if the ballot is not returned in favor of the proposed rates and charges. In the event the proposed charges are abandoned, the homeowners' association will assume responsibility for residential street lighting services within the subdivision. Enclosed is your ballot and the District's Procedures for the completion, return and tabulation of Ballots. Please consult these Procedures for details regarding the ballot process. You may also contact the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, for further information regarding this matter. OFFICIAL BALLOT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES PROPERTY; Lots 1-32 of Tract No. 25892, described as a subdivision of Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 20182 on file in Book 130, Pages 40 and 41, of Parcel Maps of Riverside County, California. YES, I approve of the proposed annual levy of $25.68 for Service Level B on the parcels identified on this ballot. OWNER: Mr. Chong-Shu Wang 13081 Stanton Santa Ana, CA 92705 NO, I do not approve of the proposed annual levy of $25.68 for Service Level B on the parcels identified on this ballot. I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury, that I am the record owner, or the authorized representative of the record owner, of the parcels identified above. Signature Date Print Name CHECK ONLY ONE BOX. BALLOTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK AND RETURNED TO THE CITY CLERK/DISTRICT SECRETARY CITY OF TEMECULA, P.O. BOX 9033/43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92589-9033 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPLETION, RETURN, AND TABULATION OF BALLOTS I. Completion of Ba!!ots · Who may complete a ballot A ballot may be completed by the owner of the parcel to be charged. As used in these Procedures, the term "owner" includes the owner's authorized representative. If the owner of the parcel is a partnership, joint tenancy, or tenancy in common, a ballot may be completed by any of the general partners, joint tenants, or tenants in common. Only one ballot may be completed for each parcel. · Duplicate ballots If a ballot is lost, destroyed or never received, the City Clerk/District Secretary will provide a duplicate ballot to the owner upon receipt of a request in writing to the City Clerk, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, Or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. The duplicate ballot will be marked to show the date on which the ballot was provided and to identify it as a duplicate ballot. · Marking and signing the ballot To complete a ballot, the owner of the parcel must (1) mark the appropriate box supporting or opposing the proposed rate and charge, and (2) sign, under penalty of perjury, the statement on the ballot that the person completing the ballot is the owner of the parcel or the owner's authorized representative. Only one box may be marked on each ballot. Ballots must be completed in ink. · Only ballots provided by the District will be accepted The District will only accept ballots mailed or otherwise provided to owners by the District. Photocopies, faxes, and other forms of the ballot will not be accepted. II. Return of Ba!!ots · Who may return ballots A ballot may be returned by the owner of the parcel or by anyone authorized by the owner to return the ballot. · Where to return ballots Ballots may be mailed to the City Cleric/District Seeretary's Office, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, (the District has provided a return postage-paid envelope). Ballots may also be delivered in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Ballots may not be returned by fax. · When to return ballots All returned ballots must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office prior to 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998. The City Clerk/District Secretary will stamp on the ballot the date of its reedpt. · Withdrawal of ballots Ai~er returning a ballot to the District, the person who signed the ballot may withdraw the ballot by submitting a written request in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Such request must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998. If any ballot has been withdrawn, the person withdrawing the ballot may request a duplicate ballot. The City Clerk/District Secretary will retain all withdrawn ballots and will indicate on the face of such ballots that they have been withdrawn. HI. Tabulation of Ba!lots · Which ballots will be counted Only ballots which are completed and returned in compliance with these procedures will be counted. Ballots received by the City Clerk/District Secretary after 3:30 p.m. on March 2, 1998 will not be counted. Ballots which are not signed by the owner will not be counted. Ballots with no boxes marked, or with more than one box marked, will not be counted. Ballots withdrawn in accordance with these procedures will not be counted. The City Clerk/District Secretary will keep a record of each duplicate ballot provided to an owner and will verify, prior to counting any duplicate ballot, that only one ballot has been returned for the parcel. If a non- duplicate ballot has been t'eturned, the District will count the non-duplicate ballot and disregard all duplicate ballots. If only duplicate ballots have been returned, the District will count the earliest provided duplicate ballot and disregard the later provided duplicate ballots. · How ballots will be tabulated Ballots may be counted by hand, by computer or by any other tabulating device. · Who will tabulate ballots Ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary. · When and where will the ballots be tabulated Ballots will be opened and tabulated on Monday, March 2, 1998, at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference Room at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590. This process is open to the general public. · Results of tabulation The results of the tabulation will be announced following the completion of the tabulation and entered in the minutes of the next Board of Directors meeting on March 10, 1998. IV. Resolution of Disputes In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is the owner of the parcel to which the ballot applies, the District will make such determination from the last equalized assessment roll and any evidence of ownership submitted to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other evidence as to ownership of property and the District's determination of ownership will be final and conclusive. In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is an authorized representative of the owner of the parcel, the District may rely on the statement on the ballot, signed under penalty of perjury, that the person completing the ballot is the owner's authorized representative and any evidence submitted to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other evidence as to whether the signer of the ballot is an authorized representative of the owner and the District's determination will be final and conclusive. V. General Information For further information, contact the City Clerk/District Secretary at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 9, 1997 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:44 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Lindemans presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorsen, and City Clerk Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. ECAP Contract 1.1 Approve a contract with ECAP and authorize the Chairman and General Counsel to execute the contract. 2. Inland Empire Economic PartnershiD Contrect 2.1 Approve an annual contract with the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) and authorize the Executive Director and City Attorney to execute the agreement. MOTION: Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Stone, moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:45 P.M., the following items were discussed in joint session with the Temecula City Council with Mayor Roberts presiding: 3. International Rectifier Fab-9 Owner Parti~i.~ation Agreement 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes. RDA\120997 1 Temecula Redevelo~)ment Aaencv 120997 RESOLUTION NO. 97-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Redevelopment Director McLarney presented the staff report (as per agenda material). For Agency Member Lindemans, Ms. McLarney provided additional clarification with regard to the incentive reimbursements to the developer. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved, seconded by Agency Member Comerchero, to adopt Resolution No. 97-134 and No. RDA 97-09. Voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . Formation of Joint Exercise of Powers Authority Establishing the Westside Improvement Authority 4.1 Adopt a City Council resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 97-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA 4.2 Adopt a Redevelopment Agency resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA 4.3 The City and the Redevelopment Agency execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Westside Improvement Authority. Minutes. RDA\120997 2 Temecula Redevelo_~ment Aoencv 120997 Due to a conflict of interest because of property ownership in Old Town, Agency Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. Executive Director Bradley presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that the staff report should be corrected to reflect the accurate Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement amount of ~ 104,500, not ~ 105,000. MOTION: Agency Member Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 97-135 and No. RDA 97-10, and to execute the joint exercise of powers agreement creating the Westside Improvement Authority. Agency Member Comerchero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained. At this time, the joint session with the City Council was adjourned and the Redevelopment Agency reconvened to discuss regularly scheduled Agency business. President Lindemans presiding. REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT Although it was a rainy evening, Redevelopment Director McLarney thanked everyone who had participated in the City's first Tree Lighting Ceremony. To those that have not finished their Christmas shopping, she encouraged shopping at Old Town. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS Agency Member Ford thanked those property owners who assisted in obtaining new lights on the westerly side of Main Street. Minutes. RDA\120997 3 Temecula Redevelooment Aaencv 1209~i7 ADJOURNMENT At 7:54 P.M., the Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: City Clerk/Agency Secretary Greek Minutes. RDA\120997 4 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 16, 1997 CALL TO ORDER An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:30 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, City Clerk Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Agency Member Ford moved for the approval of Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exceDti{)n of Director Comerchero who abstained with regard to 1.1. 1. ADoroyal of Minutes _ _ 1.1 Minutes of November 18, 1997 1.2 Minutes of November 25, 1997 REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS None given. Minutes. RDA\ 121697 1 Temecula Redevelo_oment Ao_ encv 121697 ADJOURNMENT At 7:31 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Karel Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/District Secretary Minutes. RDA\ 121697 2 ITEM 2 CITY ATTORNEY ~ II CITY MANAGER .'~ II TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 13, 1998 Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members receive and file the Financial Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997. Please see the attached financial statements for the analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Redevelopment Agency Combining Balance Sheet As of September 30, 1997 Assets and other debits: Cash and investments Receivables Land held for resale Total assets Low/Mod Fund 2,689,646 841,936 3,531,582 CIP Fund Debt Service 10,238,458 294,044 2,103,053 $ 12,635,555 $ 4,876,690 47,396 $ 4,924,086 Total 17,804,794 1,183,376 2,103,053 21,091,223 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other current liabilities Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated 317,825 317,825 $ 3,213,757 $ 3,048,340 452,924 3,501,264 $ 2,709,171 6,425,120 1,448,920 3,475,166 3,048,340 770,749 3,819,089 7,371,848 9,900,286 Total fund balances 3,213,757 9,134,291 4,924,086 17,272,134 $ 12,635,555 $ Total liabilities and fund balances $ 3,531,582 4,924,086 21,091,223 Please note that these balances are unaudited. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Bahnee - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Property tax increment Investment interest Rental income Miscellaneous Total Revenues Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 1,280,000 $ 77 140,000 40,082 204,000 50,594 2,782 1,624,000 93,535 Encumbr. Total Activity Percent of Budget $ 77 0% 40,082 29% 50,594 25% 2,782 93,535 6% (1) Expenditures: Salaries and wages Operating and administrative expenditures Pujol & Sherwood Apts. operating costs Home buyer programs Rehabilitation programs Housing development & acquisition North Pujol housing project 195,720 48,303 315,560 56,220 134,000 44,313 700,000 95,250 200,000 21,030 1,130,000 62 875,000 2,315 64 81,945 48,367 138,165 44,313 95,250 21,030 62 2,315 Total Expenditures 3,550,280 267,493 82,009 349,502 Revenues Over/CUnder) Expenditures (1,926,280) (173,958) 3,387,715 3,387,715 1,461,435 $ 3,213,757 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 $ 25% 44% 33% 14% 11% 0% 0% 10% Notes: (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency-CIP For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Investment interest Rental income Loan interest Advances from other funds Miscellaneous Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity 200,000 $ 86,332 102,000 26,160 25,000 5,458 75,750 18,938 740 Total Revenues 402,750 137,628 Expenditures (2): Winchester Road interchange First street bridge Sixth street parking Old Town building facades Old town streetscape Salaries and wages Operating and administrative expenditures Interest City admin charges Fee reimbursement Economic development Consulting services Legal services Owner participation agreements City marketing program Old Town plan implementation Auto dealer assn. loan credit Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/CClnder) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 1,205,863 843,576 3,598,601 1,465 221,053 194,285 145,444 2,963,500 89,976 219,520 53,812 108,275 19,267 75,750 18,938 74,790 21,045 30,000 251,425 238,425 72,564 28,498 90,000 6,942 243,000 141,407 34,815 50,000 10,382 140,000 1,554,582 Encumbr. Total Activity 86,332 26,160 5,458 18,938 740 137,628 122,245 70,084 6,065 Percent of Budget 83,684 64 7,702 43% 26% 22% 25% 35,954 34% 965,821 71,549 200,350 173,660 53,876 26,969 18,938 21,045 238,425 64,452 6,942 34,815 10,382 11,185,774 1,561,426 325,798 1,887,224 (10,783,024) (1,423,798) 10,558,089 10,558,089 $ (224,935) $ 9,134,291 80% 2% 91% 6% 25% 25% 25% 28% 95% 89% 8% 25% 21% 17% (1) (2) (3) (4) Notes: (1) The variance in Investment Interest is due to higher than anticipated cash and investment balances. (2) Annual funding for 1997-98 had been disbursed by September 30, 1997 to most agencies. (3) The variance is due to the entire loan credit being realized in 1996-97. (4) The variances in CIP project expenditures and operating transfers out are due to the timing of when the various projects are started. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency - Debt Service For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1997 Revenues: Annual Amended YTD Budset Activity Percent of Budget Property tax increment Investment interest Deferred passthrough Total Revenues 5,120,000 $ 1,725 0% (1) 125,000 57,220 46% (2) 881,670 (3) 6,126,670 58,945 1% Expenditures: Passthrough agreements Property tax admin fees Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Trustee admin fees Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 1997 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 1997 3,710,350 75,000 620,000 827,400 5,000 413,700 2,485 5,237,750 416,185 888,920 (357,240) 5,281,326 5,281,326 $ 6,170,246 $ 4,924,086 (3) (3) (4) 50% (4) 50% 8% Notes: (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May of each fiscal year. (2) The variance in Investment Interest is due to higher than anticipated cash and investment balances. (3) These costs are directly related to property tax increment revenue, and are incurred when increment revenue is received in January and May of each fiscal year. (4) Debt service payments are made in August and February of each fiscal year. ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA,~ CITY MANAGER . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENCY REPORT Redevelopment Agency/Executive Director Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 13, 1998 Amend Scope of Work with Webb and Associates to Prepare Construction Drawings for the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project Prepared By: John R. Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency approve an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement to expand the scope of work and authorize additional fees in the amount of $52,230 to Webb and Associates to Prepare Construction Drawings for the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project in accordance with the proposal and authorize the Chair to execute the Amendment on behalf of the Agency. BACKGROUND In March of 1997 the Agency authorized Webb and Associates to develop Construction Drawings for the Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project. This project includes the streetscape improvements, gateway landscape improvements and drainage improvements. Webb has completed the design development phase of the project and has completed approximately 45% of the construction drawing phase. The proposed amendments and associated costs fall into two categories. The first category consists of tasks that are in addition to the original scope of work. The second category consists of tasks that need to be expanded from the original scope of work. Category One These tasks include coordination of future underground utilities, increased drainage facilities and increased improvements on Main Street. The scope of work for this project was developed prior to the conclusion of the Old Town Undergrounding Feasibility Study. That study has concluded that undergrounding all utilities in Old Town would cost nearly 82.5 million. During the design development stage it was determined that any future undergrounding should be limited to the area at the Front and Main Street intersection. The utility companies are now designing these improvements. Webb will be required to coordinate the design of undergrounding the utilities with the proposed Streetscape improvements. R:\OLDTOWN\STREET\STSCAPE.AMD 1/6/98 jrm 1 The original drainage improvements were anticipated to be limited to Third and Sixth Street. After thoroughly reviewing the drainage proposals, Webb has determined additional drainage facilities will be required at First Street and the north end of Mercedes to pick-up outlets at the Caltrans right of way. These improvements are necessary to keep storm water off Front Street. The original scope of work was developed while Buffman was still proposing to develop in Old Town. As a result, the street improvements on Main Street, east of Front, extended only to the edge of the proposed Buffman project (about a third of the way to Mercedes). It is now recommended to extend the improvements to Mercedes. Category Two These tasks include expanding the role of the Old Town Uaison and additional services relating to the boardwalk. The Old Town Uaison serves as a 'man on the street" providing information and receiving feedback form the merchants and property owners in Old Town. This position has been priceless in terms of keeping people in Old Town informed. The original contract called for 100 hours, which has been expended. Staff supports keeping this position through the public bid process which is projected at an additional 120 hours. The boardwalk improvements at the Sixth Street Parking lot were completed after the Streetscape project started. There were concerns over those improvements. Webb was asked to research and recommend alternative ways to install the boardwalk and alternative materials and finishes to replace the boardwalk. This task expanded beyond what was anticipated in the original scope of work. FISCAL IMPACT The Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project is included in the 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program. A total of $2,998,500 has been included for the design, administration and construction of the project. The original contract amount for the construction drawings is $209,875. Staff negotiated the costs for the contract amendment as follows: Category One Underground Utilities Coordination: Increased Drainage Facilities Increased Main Street Improvements Category Two Old Town Liaison Boardwalk Services Total $ 8,325 $17,180 $34,005 (16 %) $ 8,4O0 ~ (9%) Adequate funds are budgeted for the $52,230 in Account No. 280-199-824-5800. Attachment: 1. Scope of Work/Cost Proposal R:\OLDTOWt~TI~API~..A.I~fi) 1/'/191 jna 2 ATTACHMENT I Scope of Work/Cost Proposal R:\STAFFRPT\STSCAPE.PSA 1/5/98 jrm 3 ALBERT A. ASSOCIATES 3788 McCray S~reet. Riverside, CA 92506 (9O9) 686-1070 FAX (9O9) 788-1256 3600 Lime Street, Ste. 312 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 781-6190 FAX (9O9) 788-4139 28481 Rancho California Rd., Ste. 106 Temccula, CA 92590 (909) 690,-9250 FAX (909) 6994032 w.o. 97-0058 November 20, 1997 Mr. John Meyer, Senior Planner City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re: Additional Engineering Services for Old Towne Streetscape Project Dear John: Webb Associates has completed the Design Development Phase of the Old Towne Streetscape Project and has reviewed the project with the task force at their September 16, 1997 meeting. Developments arising from this phase of work has led to changes in the schedule, as well as the scope of the design project. We respectfully request a contract amendment prior to proceeding with this additional work. The extra work that we are seeking additional compensation for is as follows: COORDINATION OF FUTURE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES: At the task force meeting, Webb Associates raised concerns with the underground utility conduit that was requested by the City to be incorporated into this project. The spady that the City contracted for was a prelim,.'nm3~ design to idemi~., the various utility needs. We were instructed by the City that Public Works would coordinate with the utility consultant and Webb Associates. During our meeting with the utility consultant, it became apparent that the utility study was too schematic in nature to be properly incorporated into the streetscape project. We requested more definite information relating to the location of utility vaults, manholes and pullboxes, since these locations will impact the location of the streetscape features (i.e., street lights, bus stops, information signs, etc.). The utility consultant informed us that the level of design was not available yet and that the City had not approved that portion of their contract. The utility consultant was to get back to us with more information regarding this matter. As of this date, we have not received any further information on the underground utilities and based upon our last telephone conversation with Pubic Works, there has been no progress made 97-0058/Temecula2.doc CML ENGINEERING ,, PLANNING * ASSESSMENT/SPECIAL TAX ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS * SURVEYING * CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION Mr. John Meyer November 20, 1997 Page 2 2, towards resolving the concerns we raised at the last task force meeting. Because of the time constraints associated with having the various utility companies develop their design drawings and then incorporating that design into the streetscape project, we feel that it is essential that Webb Associates take the lead in coordinating this effort with the utility companies. In order to accomplish this task, Webb Associates proposes to perform the following scope of work: Contact the various utility agencies and request that they prepare construction drawings for the undergrounding of the existing utilities. Provide the utility companies with the base map drawing to have each utility company use in the preparation of their design. Attend coordination meetings with each utility company so that conflicts between utility companies and streetscape features can be minimized. This type of coordination will be essential since there are several areas where the utilities will be placed under concrete features (i.e., concrete islands and concrete street intersections). · Once the various utility companies have prepared the construction drawings, incorporate the basic layout into the streetscape drawings to make a final review for conflicts. · Include the utility company construction drawings as part of the construction bid. Since it is not clear at this time if funds will be available to the complete underground conduit installation, the bid will be structured to also include the installation of the underground conduits beneath the concrete features only at this time. We believe that a minimum of 100 hours will be necessary to coordinate plans with all the utility companies and incorporate the appropriate design and specifications into the bid pac~kage. This change in scope will result in an additional cost of $4b,-1-04kO0~..~'~>l~ 7, ~ INCREASED DRAINAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS: Since the time of the first task force meeting, Webb Associates has had conversations with the Public Works Department about the drainage tributary to Old Towne. After reviewing the hydrology and cirainage, it was determined that in addition to the drainage structures conveying storm flows under the highway at 3ra and 6th Street, there are additional culverts crossing the highway at Mercedes and First Street. The drainage from these two areas will impact Front Street and must be dealt with. This will result in additional storm drains within Front Street. Webb Associates proposes to provide the following scope of work: · Prepare the final design of additional storm drain facilities for Front Street to accept drainage from Mercedes and First Streets. These facilities will tie into the 3rd Street and 6th Street storm drain systems and minimize additional impacts to Murrieta Creek. The schematic design for the additional drainage facilities was included in the latest set of design development drawings for your review. 97-0058/Temecula2.doc Mr. John Meyer November 20, 1997 Page 3 . e o Prepare a drainage plan to correct the flooding problem at the easterly end of First Street so that the drainage may be intercepted at Front Street. In reviewing the First Street project, we noted that there could be a potential cost savings by intercepting the water at Front Street and conveying the flows into the proposed storm drain in Front Street. We propose to incorporate this design prior to proceeding with construction drawings for the storm drain. This change in scope will result in an additional cost of $17,180.00. INCREASED SERVICES FOR THE OLD TOWNE LIAISON: Our original scope of work for the Old Towne Liaison was based on a fixed number of hours at a rate of $85 per hour. We have already exceeded that original estimate partially due to the result of the extended design development phase, and have projected an additional 120 hours to effectively represent the City throughout the completion of the design and bidding phase of the project. In an effort to reduce the cost of these services, we propose to reduce the effective rate to $70/hour, resulting in an additional cost of $8,400.00. INCREASED IMPROVEMENTS ON MAIN STREET: The original scope of work called for only 150'+ of improvements on Main Street east of Front Street. During the design development phase, the City decided to extend the improvements on Main Street easterly to Mercedes Street. Additionally, the City has requested that we explore the possibility of angled parking on the south side of Main Street, west of Front Street. The expanded scope will result in additional construction drawings for street lighting, landscape and irrigation, streetscape features, and infrastructure improvements and an additional cost of $8,500.00. ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR BOARDWALK REQUIREMENTS: Webb Associates and their consultant team spent a considerable amount of additional time in the design development phase as a result of issues that were not anticipated by Webb Associates and/or the City staff. These issues include altemati. ves to the use of boardwalk. Following the. City Council review of the completed 6th Street Parking Lot Project, there were questions raised about the use of boardwalk for the Old Towne Streetscape Project. There were extensive efforts put forth by Webb Associates and iDLA that were beyond the scope of work for the design development phase in order to demonstrate that an effective boardwalk could be constructed and maintained. These efforts included research on alternate boardwalk products and design. Field trips were made with the consultant team and at times, City staff, to surrounding communities to inspect these various boardwalk installations. Several exhibits were prepared and additional meetings were held. Since this issue was not anticipated by City staff, several internal meetings were held that resulted in delays and lost time on the project schedule. Additionally, field checks of the topographic data determined that the aerial topographic survey data provided by the City was not adequate to 97-0058/Temecula2.doc Mr. John Meyer November 20, 1997 Page 4 properly perform the detailed design required. As a result, additional time was needed to collect the appropriate survey data. Once this information was incorporated into the design, conflicts between the existing topographical features and the proposed streetscape features were discovered that dictated revisions in the design. These revisions include changes in the location of streetlights, bus stops, steps, and the sequencing of concrete sidewalk and boardwalk. As a result of these efforts, the design development phase has exceeded our project budget, and delayed the design approximately 2 months beyond the time projected for this phase. We have reviewed to the cost of the overrims and are requesting compensation of ~r3;-H~00-to cover the cost of additional meetings, sub- consultant fees, and our cos~fgr additional survey services. "~clt~,5' d we e re uesun a cnane order ~n The atbrementioned eftbrt totaled $-5~380-k~'an ar q ' g ' g ' that amount. We hope that a timely approvtila9f this contract addendum will allow us to avoid any further delays in the project schedule. ~6'Z.~ ~O If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES Roger D. Prend, P.E. Vice President RDP:kg Encl. cc: Scott R. Hildebiandt. 97-0058/Temecula2.doc ITEM 4 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~ CITY MANAGER ~-' TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 13, 1998 Consultant Selection for Old Town Marketing Analysis/Economic Consulting RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members: 1) Approve a Contract with Keyser Marston Associates to provide economic consulting services for Old Town Temecula and Westside area. 2) Authorize Executive Director and City Attorney to execute the Contract with Keyser Marston. 3) Appropriate $40,000 from RDA Fund Balance to the RDA Consulting line item. DISCUSSION: In connection with the Old Town Specific Plan, the Agency Members have directed staff to prepare a business attraction program for Old Town. In doing so, we prepared a Request for Qualifications to select a firm to prepare a marketing plan for the Old Town core. Five firms were interviewed by a panel consisting of Marilyn Whisenand, Mary Jane McLarney, John Meyer and Chairperson Lindemans. The panel ranked Keyser Marston first based on their experience with similar projects and their understanding of the Old Town area. The detailed scope of work is attached and includes marketing analysis, shopper surveys and stake holder interviews. FISCAL IMPACT: A budget transfer of $40,000 from the RDA Fund Balance to 280-199-999-5248 is necessary to fund this contract. R:~SYERSK\STAFFREi~OLDTWN.CON 1/7/88 kge Attachments: Keyser Marston Scope of Work Keyser Marston Contract R:~SYERSK~STAFFREP~OLDTWN.CON 117/98 kg~ 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGR~~ FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEM~NT, is made and effective as of 1anuary 13, 1998, between the Redevelopment Agency, a municipal corporation (#Agency*) and Keyser Marston Associates ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 13,1998 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event ~ater than January 13, 1998, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant upon issuance of final report. This amount shall not exceed Forty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($43,940) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed Forty Three Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($43,940). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual s~rvices performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGRF~F~MENT WITHOUT CAUSe. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. R:~SYF. R8IC~O~8.MAR 1/~/98 Itgs -~2- Revi~d 9/18195 7. OWNERSHIP OF DO~NTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free ace, s to the representatives of City o~ its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. ¢. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE REQ_~E~~. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insuran~. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: R:~SYERSK~ORI~MI~q~O~YS.MAR 1/5/98 k~s =3= Rcvi~ed 9/18/95 (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the consultant' s profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. c. Deductibles and Serf-Insured Retention.~. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: Thc City, its officers, officials, cmployces and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products 1/5/98 kga -4- Revised 9/18/95 and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements cffecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. R:~SYERSK'~AO~$.MAR 115798 k~s -5- Revimi 9118195 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACeR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RF~PONSIBILITIF~. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City R:~SYERSK~G~S.MAR 1/5/98 k~s '6= Revised 9/1gl95 retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate tully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. ]~2.~.C..~. Any notices which either party may desfie to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (rio mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: Attention: Executive Director Temecula Redevelopment Agency 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92590 To Consultant: Keyser Marston Associates 1660 Hotel Circle North,Suite 716 San Diego,CA 92108 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 15. ~. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOnG LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMIZ~NT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or R:~gYERSIGAOREBMI]N~EY$.MAR 1/5/98 ir~s -7- Revised 9/18/95 effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUT~ THIN AGREEMF~NT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. R~r~EVELOPMENT AGENCY By Karel F. Lindemans Chairperson Attest: lune S. Greek City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney Keyser Marston Associates Paul C. Marta R:~SYF.~K~O~I~fi~N~Y$.MAR 1/5/98 kgs -8- Revised 9/18/95 KEYSE R MARSTON 1660 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH, SUITE 716 S^~ DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 PHONe: 619/718-9500 FAX: 619/718-9508 E-MAIL: kmasd@kmainc.corn WEB SITE: http: //www.kmainc.com ASSOCIATES INC. AD VISORS IN; REAL ESTATE REDEVELOPMENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FISCAL IMPACT INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE VALUATION AND LITIGATION SUPPORT October 17, 1997 Ms. Mary Jane McLarney Director of Redevelopment City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Draft Proposals for Consulting Services Dear Mary Jane: SAN DIEGO GERALD M. TRIMBLE ROBERT J. WETMORE PAUL C. M^RRA Los ANGELE5 CALVIN E. HOLLIS, II KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. R^BE SAN FRANCISCO A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. K£LL¥ KATE EARLE FUNK DENISE E. CONLEY DEBBIE M. KERN MARTHA N. PACKARD Thank you for inviting me recently to meet with you, John Meyer, and Marilyn Whisenand to discuss the City's goals for Old Town Temecula and the Westside area. Per our discussions, I am forwarding Keyset Marston Associates, Inc.'s (KMA's) draft proposals for economic consulting services. We have organized our work scope as follows: 1. KMA proposes to commence with a market/financial review of the Old Town Entertainment Project. , As the next step, KMA proposes to undertake a market assessment of the Old Town Specific Plan area. The market assessment will address: major opportunities and constraints; supply and demand conditions; and concerns of major property/business owners. 3. In addition, we have incorporated a proposal from CIC Research, Inc. to conduct shopper intercept and resident phone surveys. Please call me with any comments once you have had a chance to review our proposed work program. We look forward to assisting you on this important project. Thank you. Sincerely, KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul C. Marra attachments 97163ndh Market/Financial Overview OM Town Entertainment Project Proposed Work Scope 1. Review the following background information: a) b) c) d) e) f) Old Town Temecula, Westside, and Southside Specific Plans Previous Old Town Entertainment Project proposal and Development Agreement Price Waterhouse and Arthur Andersen studies Current project description and developer pro forma Smith Barney correspondence re: proposed financing structure Developer qualifications, comparable experience, and financial strength . Participate in teleconferences with City staff, developer, and/or Smith Barney to gather additional information. 3. Verify market support based on review of patronage and expenditures forecasts. . Evaluate the financial feasibility/financing gap for the project based on review of developer's financial pro forma. o Verify supportable debt and equity financing for the Old Town Entertainment Project based on review of Stone & Youngberg and Smith Barney memoranda. . Review a range of public financing tools available for the development of the project/supporting infrastructure based on discussions with Stone & Youngberg. Estimated Buclget Budget: Time-and-materials basis subject to $10,000 budget. Product: One (1) memorandum report documenting: (a) KMA's review; (b) key issues and concerns; (c) need for additional information and/or analyses; and (d) conclusions regarding the project's market/financial feasibility and need for financial assistance. Note: If sufficient information is not available. KMA will render conclusions subject to any significant limitations that may apply. Limitations.' · Excludes original market research. · Excludes independent financial modeling by KMA. · Excludes meetings with City staff or officials. 97163ndh Market Assessment Old Town Temecula Proposed Work Scope A. Opportunities and Constraints Assessment 1. Tour the study area and environs. 2. Review the following plans and proposals and other relevant planning information: a) b) Promenade regional mall and power center development plans City's Economic Development Strategic Plan o Review existing business conditions in study area, including tenant mix, size, and sales productivity (based on HDL data provided by City). . o Review existing building/site configuration, land use mix, and ownership pattems in study area (based on data provided by City planning department). Identify key public and (competitive) private projects anticipated to be implemented during the near-term, including status of Front Street public improvements and demonstration block. 6. Summarize major opportunities and constraints. B. Public Participation Process o Conduct stakeholder interviews with private business and property interests to be identified by City. 2. Conduct shopper intercept survey. See separate CIC Research, Inc. proposal. 3. Conduct resident phone survey. See separate CIC Research, Inc. proposal. C. Market Assessment o Update demographic and economic factors affecting market demand for private land uses in Old Town Temecula. 2. Prepare five- and ten-year retail space demand forecast models. 97163ndh o 4. Evehmte visitor rs. local pat~onnge. besed on shopper intercept surveys. Identify key market segnumts with moderate to ~ron8 demand in the neer- (5 years) and mid-term (10 yenrs) horizons. Provid~ a ~mcifio review of tim fea~~ of a oonsider existin~ and phireed ~ in tams oftIra Promenade, Ontario ~ 6. Ident~ key site opportunitiee for new development and/or rehab'~tion. . Preparo · market absorption forecast indicefin~ the range of amounts, type, and lhnin8 of private d~'vclo~ that can be (~:)mrod in study area under two altemafivu: with the'Old Town Entertainment Project. without the Old Town Entertainnmnt Project. .F..s'ttmat~ Bu~t Budget: Mxed-fee estinmte8 as follows: ~ $'24,500 CIC Reseatall, Inc. $15.440 Total $~9,940 Products: Ono (1) camera-ready draft report and one (1) cnmer~ready final report. Limitations: · Includes a maximum of one (1) day of stakeholder intorview~ , Includes a maximum of two (2) meetings with City staff and/or officials. 97163ndh of SUd .. ,iM.q61~t,t6t9, uo.f:l .. ucl~c:Et 9661, ,g A_tunuuf, Aupuo~lI This budget estimate specifically reflects the cost efficiencies that KMA will achieve by simultaneously undertaking the Market/Financial Overview of the Old Town Entertainment Project. Review of background data, plans, and studies for the Old Town Entertainment Project will be beneficial to both work scopes. Other.' See attached correspondence from CIC Research, Inc. 97163ndh Hourly Fee Schedule Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 1997/1998 A. JERRY KEYSER* $180.00 SENIOR PRINCIPALS* $165.00 PRINCIPALS* $155.00 SENIOR ASSOCIATES* $135.00 ASSOCIATES $120.00 SENIOR ANALYST $105.00 ANALYST $ 95.00 TECHNICAL STAFF $ 67.50 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF $ 52.50 Directly related job expenses not included in the above rates are: auto mileage, air fares, hotels and motels, meals, car rentals, taxies, telephone calls, delivery, electronic data processing, graphics and printing. Directly related job expenses will be billed at 110% of costs. Monthly billings for staff time and expenses incurred during the period will be payable within thirty (30) days of invoice date. A charge of 1% per month will be added to all past due accounts. *Rates for individuals in these categories will be increased by 50% for time spent in court testimony. 97163ndh CIC RESEARCH, INC. October 17, 1997 (Ret4eed 1/5/~) Mr. Paul Mama Keyser Marston 1~<) Hotel Circle N, Ste 716 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Paul: This letter constitutes ClC Rasearch's bid to cenduct a teleplxx~ survey of residents and an Intercept survey of shoppers in the Old Town .a~lon of Temecula. This preparation of a final report as well as presenting the costs and statistloal oonfidenoe involved with choosing .'liferent sample sizes. METHODOLOGY CIC proposes to first cz)nduot an Intercept survey among shoppers in the downtown Temecula area, Including bolh maidants and vlsitom to the area. By asking for lhe $hopper's ZIP code, the Intercept survey would also be used to determine ~e local primary market area to be ~alled in the telephone survey of local residents. After the Intercept survey is completed, the telephone survey would be underlaken. Both interviews would be approximately 5 minutes in length. ShOPOCr_ I~e_r~e_ ~ ,~urvey The first task would be questionnaire preparation whk:h would be accomplished jointly with Keyset Marston and the client (the team). ClC would prepare the first draft of the questionnaires and fax a copy of the survey Instruments to the team for review and comments. After the questionnaire Is finalized the survey would begin. The first day of the survey would serve as the pretest and any problems with the survey Instrument would be discussed with the team and changes made If rtece~. ClC would send experienced field intewlewem to Temecula to conduct the surve~ on- site. Approximately half of the surveys would be cond~ during the waek. while lhe remaining half would be ~ on weekenda, The sun.rig would ~mpas8 all hours when lhe area businesses are open and would be conducted throughout the downtown area. During the survey, an effort would be made to obtain ZIP codes from a~ shoppers the intewlewers come in contact with, not only those who are imewlewed, tn order to more accurately ascertain the mix of locals and tourist~ in the downtown area. 8361 Vickm's Street · SanDiego, California 92111..2112 Te ,pi one 6a?-4000 F~c (619) 637.4040 i i HOI-%;L-!:fA ~ ~: I'1; 8661; '(; '14Uf i [£ aled -- ,gO;6gtZ6t9, moJ:l -- mdgc:Zt g66t '; XJenuer Xepuol~] Mr. Paul Marta O(~ber t 7, t 997 (Rev/~ f/$/ge) Page 8 Resident Telephone Sunder The tele~ questiormaire would also be designed by the team and oimulated for approval before the survey starts. The sample frame would be made up of those ZIP The randorn~~mg sample would be run for this market area using Genesys, CIC's In-house sampling software. This software ensures that the survey is random and that aft telephone residents of the seleoted ~rea have an equal opporlunlffy of being drawn In the sample, even those who have un~ telephone numbers. After the sample is drawn, ClC would conduct a pretest of appmxlmataly 20 households. The results of the pretest would be dis4~ussed with the team and <;hanges made, if necessary, before flnalizing the quesl}ormaim. The survey would be condu(~ed from CIC's sunmy facility located at its headquarters In San Diego, under the direct supervlalon of suwey superv~ no surveys are ever conducted from Interviewers' homes. Quality asmJfance Is maintained by having a supervisor present during all interviewing and validating approximately 10 percent of the intewlews. Interviews would be validated by a supervisor who either ~aiis the respondent back to verify the Interview or monitors the call by listening In on a monitoring llne while the intewlew is In progress. _Compeer Pm~ess the_Data .a....nd pre~_ are_ _a Rnal Rermrt After the surveys are completed, ClC would edit and code all questionnaires In preparation for entering the data into an electronic data base. Date would be entered through the use of a ~jMom-wrlttml cemputer data erd~ program whi(~ checks for Inconsistent and out-of-range ariswere es the data Is entered. As a I'mel ~ep, a quaJib/ assurance review of the data would be undertaken. Next, a draft final report of the study's findings would be prepared, consisting of a maximum of 50 pages inoluding an execSlye summap/, text, statistical tables and graphs. The team would have an opportunity to review the draft and submE comments before the final version is submitted. PROJECT COSTS The desired statlstic, al level of confidence and tolerable error determine the sample size and thus the project cost. ClC re<x)m~ a confidance level of eS~ (with a tolerable error of d:5%), which would require a ~ample size of 384. ~imply stated, the larger the sample size, Ihe more confident we can be that Ihe survey results accurately reflect the attitucles and shopping habits of Teme~ula residents and vbito~. Pri<~ for this option am given below. 8361 Vic, kors 8treot · San Diego, Cali~rnia 92111-2112 Telephone (619) 637-~)0 Fax: (619) 637.4040 I~ ,,,d -- .,O;~Z6~. ,o~ -- -d~s:Z~ e~ '; X~,,u,~ ~,puo~I Mr. Paul Marta O~tober 17, 1997 (Revfsed 1/r~) Page 9 Intercept Sunmy 6,374 Telephone Sun, ey 5,880 Fina Report Total $15,440 These costs Include all ~harges co~ with lhe project, Including labor, overhead, and direct costs such as computer co~ts, ~ costs, telephone charges, fax cha~ges, travel costs to TemeGula for field In~, and up to 10 copies of the final report. CIC would be pleased to assist you with this st[~. If you have any questions or need addltional Information, please glve me a call. Sincerely, Joyce RedeIt Director of Surveys ; IS of Jud -- ,gO.q6glJ.61,9, uod:i -- udg~;:ZI, 966L 'S Xjenuuf, Xepuoi, iI Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) has one of the largest real estate and redevelopment advisory practices on the West Coast, with experience in all types of commercial and residential real estate. Founded in 1973, the firm has served 600 clients on more than 2,000 projects. Representative public sector clients include nearly every major municipality in California, cities, ports and military bases throughout the west, county and special districts, as well as public and private colleges and universities. The firm's private sector clients include financial institutions, life insurance companies, major corporations, law firms, landowners, and developers. KMA's principals are frequent speakers to industry groups such as the Urban Land Institute, International Council of Shopping Centers, League of Cities, California Community Redevelopment Association, and other similar organizations. KMA's principals have served on the Governor's Task Force on Military Base Reuse and have advised both the California Legislature's Committee on Economic Development and the California Redevelopment Association (CRA). KMA provides services through its three offices in California: San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. Services include: · Real Estate Product Definition Strategic Plans I-! Implementation I-! Predevelopment Management · Redevelopment · Economic Development Strategies · Infrastructure Finance · Housing · Fiscal Impact · Valuation and Litigation Support Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Golden Gateway Commons 55 Pacific Avenue Mall San Francisco, California 94111 415/398-3050 Fax: 415/397-5065 E-maih kmasf@ kmainc.com Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 500 South Grand Avenue Suite 1480 Los Angeles, California 90071 213/622-8095 Fax: 213/622-5204 E-mail: kmala@ kmainc.com Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 1660 Hotel Circle North Suite 716 San Diego, California 92108 619/718-9500 Fax: 619/718-9508 E-maih kmasd@kmainc.com Relevant Project Experience Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Corona - Downtown and North Main Street Specific Plans KMA assisted planners Urban Design Studio and PBR in analyzing market, financial, and fiscal issues related to Specific Plans for the downtown and North Main Street areas of Corona, respectively. A broad range of residential, commercial, and entertainment uses were considered. Additionally, KMA's study addressed approaches for infrastructure financing and economic development. City of El Centro (Imperial County) - Downtown Movie Theater Expansion KMA provided market and financial analysis for the proposed rehabilitation and expansion of two older movie theater buildings in the downtown area. The buildings currently house a total of six screens with three additional screens with state-of-the-art features proposed. City of El Cajon - Economic Development Strategy KMA assisted the City of E1 Cajon formulate a citywide strategy for economic development as an implementation tool for both community-wide and district-level revitalization. KMA reviewed opportunities and constraints; conducted stakeholder surveys; reviewed demographic and economic trends; and analyzed market conditions for retail, industrial, office, housing, and hotel land uses. KMA also identified/recommended opportunities for downtown revitalization, other commercial retail opportunities, housing rehabilitation and new development, and industrial sector expansion. City of Escondido - Promenade Shopping Center Expansion KMA is currently preparing a retail market study for the proposed expansion of the Promenade shopping center in Escondido. Three distinct alternatives are proposed: power/value center; entertainment retail center; and an automobile sales facility. KMA's study focuses on existing market conditions and expenditure patterns in downtown/East Valley Parkway and potential impacts resulting from each development alternative. City of Indio - Business Opportunity Study KMA prepared a study of commercial market factors and retail expenditure patterns in the Coachella Valley. The study identified specific opportunities to expand businesses and attract new enterprises to the City of lndio. KMA surveyed commercial projects in Indio and neighboring cities and analyzed demographic and economic characteristics. The completed report will be used as a guide to attract new commercial tenants to Indio. Lettieri-Mclntyre and Associates, Inc. - Encinitas Sanitary District Site Analysis KMA participated on a multi-disciplinary team evaluating reuse options for an 18-acre City- owned property adjacent to downtown Encinitas. KMA prepared market and financial analyses for a range of commercial and recreational land uses under consideration. City of National City - Downtown/Waterfront Economic Development KMA completed an economic development assessment for the City regarding the downtown and waterfront areas. KMA's work included: the preparation of detailed market assessments of the downtown and waterfront areas; implementation plans for commercial development and housing in the downtown; and for marina and marina-related uses at the waterfront. Ocean Beach - Business Development and Retention Program KMA assisted the Ocean Beach Merchants Association in formulating the Ocean Beach Business Development and Retention Program. As background, KMA identified specific development opportunities and potential retail expenditures; assessed market support for potential land uses; and facilitated meetings with community groups. Additionally, shopper intercept surveys were conducted through CIC Research Inc. City of Oceanside - Entertainment/Pier Projects KMA has been actively assisting the City of Oceanside in two projects which will change the face of downtown Oceanside. The first project involves development of a cinema-anchored entertainment complex totaling 100,000 SF of GLA. The second is a pier/beachfront project that will include hotel, residential, and commercial components. For both projects, the City has attracted the involvement of high quality developers (OliverMcMillan for the cinema, and Catellus and Manchester resorts for the pier/beach development). KMA has assisted the City by providing a market assessment of uses which could be developed in the downtown. The firm then worked with the City to successfully recruit the developer for the entertainment center and is assisting the City in the financial negotiations for that project. Promote La Jolla, Inc. (San Diego) - Business Retention and Expansion KMA assisted the business improvement district for the Village of La Jolla to formulate strategies to attract and expand commercial businesses, including retail, restaurant, office, and hotel uses. As background, KMA reviewed existing plans, market inventory and occupancy, and retail sales by category. An important component of our work involved facilitation of a community workshop with La Jolla business and property owners combined with redevelopment planning and design professionals. Riverside Redevelopment Agency - Main Street Revitalization Strategy KMA assisted the City of Riverside with revitalization strategies for the retail core area adjacent to the refurbished Mission Inn. KMA's role has been to identify market segments and approaches to expand economic activity in the City center. Our recommendations to date have included a key tenant strategy and marketing and promotional guidelines. KMA also assessed the feasibility of the adaptive re-use of the Main Exchange as a loft housing development. City of Rolling Hills Estates - Economic Development Studies KMA has assisted the City of Rolling Hills Estates (Palos Verdes Peninsula) with three major studies: (1) an analysis of retail re-tenanting options for recently vacated department stores in The Shops at Palos Verdes mall; (2) a telephone shopper survey conducted by CIC Research, Inc.; and (3) an evaluation of economic development opportunities Citywide. KMA' s work has involved numerous public meetings/talk shows and stakeholder interviews; a detailed market assessment of retail, entertainment, residential, and office uses; and a recommended repositioning strategy for the mall and a Citywide economic development program. City of Santee - Santee Trolley Square KMA has assisted the City of Santee and its Community Development Commission with a transit-oriented mixed-use development, proposed to contain both entertainment retail and affordable housing. KMA's responsibilities include assessment of market support for commercial space and senior housing; financial pro forma analysis of the preferred plan and alternatives; and a fiscal impact evaluation. Valley Independent Bank- Movie Theater Feasibility Study (Calexico) KMA provided market and financial feasibility analysis of a proposed 1 O-screen, state of the art movie theater in the City of Calexico (Imperial County). The movie theater is the first phase of a planned 46-acre commercial entertainment project. The existing movie theater inventory is relatively obsolete and does not meet local demand. KMA, working in concert with the developer, the Redevelopment Agency, the Movie theater operator, and the Bank; reviewed the' developer's cost estimates, evaluated financing mechanisms, and prepared a 15-year project cash flow model. City of Vista - EntertainmentfRetail Center KMA has been assisting the City of Vista to put in place an entertainment/retail center that will be the focus for a revitalized downtown for this community in north San Diego County. The proposed development would occupy 50 acres and be anchored by a 16-screen cinema complex. The firm prepared a market assessment which reviewed the potentials for commercial and residential development. KMA's work has included assistance in developer selection, identification of the financial gap entailed by the project, and negotiations with the selected developer. PAUL C. MARRA Principal As a Principal in the San Diego office of Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA), Paul C. Marra consults in the areas of market and financial feasibility and public/private transactions. He has specialized expertise in economic development planning; commercial revitalization strategies; and retail demand analyses. Paul joined KMA in 1989. Prior to that time, he worked as a real estate economist with Bay Area and East Coast consulting firms for six years. Education Paul graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the Johns Hopkins University with a B.A. degree in Sociology. He also pursued graduate studies in transportation planning at Northwestern University. Paul is a former exchange student to Latin America and maintains his fluency in Spanish. Professional Affiliations Paul is a member of the Urban Land Institute, the American Planning Association, the California Association for Local Economic Development, and the National Council for Urban Economic Development. Presentations/Workshops · "Economic Realities of TODs: Lessons from San Diego's Suburbs," American Planning Association Planning Conference, San Diego, April, 1997. · Professional Advisory Service for City of Rolling Hills Estates, sponsored by CALED, October 1996. Focus on business development, tenant attraction, and revenue generation. · "North Park: Challenges and Opportunities," American Institute of Architects, San Diego, March 1996. · "Redevelopment in San Diego: Public/Private Partnerships," Austin (Texas) Chamber of Commerce, San Diego, January 1996. · "Retail and Business Development Workshop," Promote La Jolla, Inc., San Diego, October 1995. · "Imperial Avenue Corridor Urban Design Charrette," with Wallace Roberts & Todd, Southeastern Economic Development Corporation, San Diego, November 1994. · "El Cajon Boulevard Community Planning Charettes," with Roesling Nakamura Architects, E1 Cajon Boulevard Business Development and Retention Project, San Diego, October 1994. Relevant Experience CityLink Investment Corp. - City Heights Urban Village (San Diego) Assisted the City and CityLink in evaluating market and financial aspects of a large-scale, inner- city redevelopment project proposed to include retail uses, a police substation, and public amenities. Gatlin Development Company- Pacific Coast Plaza (Oceanside) Prepared a market study and sales tax forecast for a proposed 440,000-SF power retail center at I-5 and Highway 78. Analyzed expenditure patterns and market competition; assessed market support; and projected net new sales tax. Austin, Texas - City Hall Consolidation Study Currently evaluating facilities to accommodate municipal government, including City-owned and - leased space; surplus City land; private office buildings potentially available for sale; and build-to- suit options. Centre City Development Corporation (San Diego) - Robinsons-May Building Re-use Provided market and financial evaluation and assistance in developer negotiations for the adaptive re-use of a Horton Plaza department store building. The building was remodeled as a mix of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment. Centre City Development Corporation (San Diego)- Z Gallerie Provided market and financial evaluation, review of developers' proposals, assistance in developer negotiations, and a re-use analysis for the adaptive re-use of the McGurck Building for upscale specialty retailer. Laguna Niguel - Cabot Road/Camino Capistrano Corridor Specific Plan Currently providing economic analysis of a Specific Plan for retail/industrial area adjacent to I-5. Identifying market opportunities, assessing financing feasibility, forecasting tax revenues, and evaluating financing mechanisms. Promote La Jolla, Inc.- Business Retention and Expansion Assisted La Jolla business improvement district with strategies to attract and expand commercial businesses, including retail, restaurant, office, and hotel uses. Co-facilitated a community workshop; reviewed market, planning, and financial issues; and recommended priorities and funding sources. Southeastern Economic Development Corporation (San Diego) - Market Street Corridor/Urban League Feasibility Studies Prepared market and financial assessments for a range of land use alternatives proposed for the corridor. As a follow-up, managed a multi-disciplinary study to evaluate re-use options for the San Diego Urban League, the largest property owner in the corridor. Imperial Beach - Corporation Yard Re-Use Potential Prepared a market assessment of re-use options for the City' s public works yard on San Diego Bay. Evaluated potential for an "eco-tourist" lodging facility. Riverside County - Mira Loma Site Worked with planners Gruen Associates to analyze market and physical conditions affecting development potential of an Agency-owned 17-acre property. Assessed potential for retail, industrial, and recreational uses on the site. San Diego - Mercado Shopping Center Assisted the Agency in evaluating developer proposals and need for financial assistance for proposed community shopping center in Barrio Logan. El Cajon Boulevard BIDs (San Diego) - Business Development and Retention Project Prepared a commercial revitalization strategy for two Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) on E1 Cajon Boulevard. Included market assessment, financial evaluation of potential developments, and strategic recommendations. Indio - Business Opportunity Study Prepared a study of commercial market factors and retail expenditure patterns in the Coachella Valley. Identified specific opportunities to expand businesses and attract new enterprises to the City. Centre City Development Corporation (San Diego) - Children's Museum Assisted in structuring transaction for 40,000-SF museum on full block in the Marina residential district. Prepared re-use analysis. Centre City Development Corporation (San Diego)- Ralphs Supermarket Reviewed development proposal and assisted in developer negotiations for a proposed 45,000-SF supermarket, over parking, in downtown San Diego. Vista - Vista Village Specific Plan Currently working with planners, architects, and environmental consultants on a Specific Plan for the Vista Village area. Identifying market support and financial feasibility for a range of new construction and rehabilitation, including retail/restaurant/entertainment, housing, office, and hotel uses. ROBERT J. WETMORE, CRE Senior Principal Mr. Wetmore is a senior principal of Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., with twenty years experience in counseling public and private clients in projects in California and throughout the United States. Since October 1993, he has been co-manager of the San Diego Office. His work has focused on economic and financial feasibility assessment; negotiations between landowners and developers for sale or lease; land leasing. Selected Project Experience · North County Transit District (NCTD) Assistance to the District for disposition (sale or lease) of land for mixed use project to be built in conjunction with the commuter rail station in Solana Beach. · City of South San Francisco Assistance to the City in establishment of the El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Project Area, including blight analysis, economic feasibility, preparation of Preliminary Report and Report to Council, assistance in fiscal negotiations, for high density transit-oriented housing. · City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency Assistance to the Corporation negotiation with a local minority developer, San Diego Mercado Associates, for development of the Mercado, a 90,000 SF neighborhood shopping center in the Barrio Logan neighborhood. City of Palm Springs Identification of strategy to provide for restoration and enhancement of downtown Palm Springs as the retail and cultural heart of Palm Springs; assessment of retail trends and specific action steps for the City. · County of Santa Cruz Provided assistance to the County Redevelopment Agency in evaluating the feasibility of retail development on key commercial sites in the unincorporated areas of the County; strategy to attract developers/end users. · City of Santa Monica Fiscal services to the Redevelopment Agency to assist in matters related to the receipt of tax increment generated by development within the two redevelopment project areas; review of market issues; value of development in-place; financial model for projection of increment; review of assessment practices. · Centre City Development Corporation, San Diego Assistance to staff of the Corporation in respect to economic evaluation and negotiation of the sale of the McGurck Building and Combination Store to a development group including Z Gallerie, which would be the first major retailer in the Gaslamp Quarter in downtown San Diego. · University of Alaska, Fairbanks Consultation regarding implementation of big box retail on a 25 acre site owned by the University. · University of California, Davis Consultation regarding business terms for a proposed biotech and residential development on 800 acres near the Davis campus. · Hamilton Air Force Base, County of Marin Assisted a major New York financial house in its evaluation and due diligence in regard to its equity investment for development of a 400 acre former Air Force Base scheduled for extensive development. Potential uses included office, R&D, single family, and multi-family. Advised client as to the market and financial parameters of the development, with assessment of the risks related to provision of water service, roadway infrastructure, toxics, and other factors affecting this complex site. · California Plaza, Los Angeles Consultation to Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency; assistance in developer selection and in negotiations between the CRA and Metropolitan Structures for $1 billion in development in downtown Los Angeles, including residential and commercial uses. · Port of Seattle Member of Development Panel, selected nationally, to make recommendations to Port Commission on disposition of the Port's Central Waterfront properties. Served both as member of panel and consultant to Port on issues regarding economic feasibility of development for residential, retail, and office. · Yerba Buena Center, San Francisco Consultation to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency in negotiations between the Agency and Olympia & York and The Marriott Corporation for major mixed- use project, in downtown San Francisco for retail, residential, office, entertainment, and hotel. Assistance to the Agency in evaluating the economics of a cinema/entertainment center of 330,000 SF and work on all aspects of developer solicitation, selection, and negotiation. · Metropolitan Transit District Board, San Diego Consultation to the Board in respect to development feasibility and land values at station in National City. · Industrial Indemnity Insurance Company Managed review by KMA of $2 billion real estate portfolio, with residential, industrial, and commercial properties, throughout the U.S., for subsidiary of the Xerox Corporation. · Marina del Rey Consultation to the Department of Beaches and Harbors of Los Angeles County on land leases for hotel, residential, retail, at largest marina in U.S. · University of Southern California, Real Estate Development Corporation Consultation for office, residential, potential high tech development near USC campus and in downtown Los Angeles. Professional Affiliations Speaker, Community Redevelopment Association (CRA), University of California (Berkeley) School of Urban Design, and seminars sponsored by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Licensed Real Estate Broker, State of California, a member of American Society of Real Estate Counselors, and State Certified Real Estate Appraiser in California. Articles "Lessor Beware! A Land Lease is Usually a Partnership," published by the Urban Land Institute, Urban Land. "Land Leases - More than Rent Schedules," published by the Urban Land Institute (co-authored with Chris Klinger), Urban Land. "Bidding for Public Property - Guidelines for Developers," published by the Urban Land Institute, Urban Land. Contribution to "Cultural Facilities in Mixed Use Development," published by the Urban Land Institute. "The Yerba Buena Center Entertainment/Retail Center," published by the Urban Land Institute (co-authored with Helen L. Sause), Urban Land (January 1995). Education A graduate of Princeton University (Phi Beta Kappa and Magna Cum Laude graduate) and holds a masters degree from University of California, Berkeley. R ereten ces Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (1) (2) Contact: Title: Client: Address: Telephone: Contact: Title: Client: Address: Telephone: Contact: Title: Client: Address: Telephone: Bret M. Plumlee Finance Director City of Rolling Hills Estates 4045 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 (310) 377-1577 Sara N. Isgur Redevelopment Project Manager City of Vista 600 Eucalyptus Avenue Vista, CA 92085 (760) 639-6190 Pamela A. White Director of Dept. of Housing & Redevelopment City of Santee 10601 Magnolia Avenue Santee, CA 92071 (619) 258-4100 WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF THE INAUGURAL MEETING WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD DECEMBER 16, 1997 An adjourned regular meeting of the Westside Improvement Authority was called to order at 7:31 P.M. at the Temecula City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ford presiding. PRESENT: 4 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Roberts, Linderoans, and Ford ABSENT: 0 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Stone Also present were Executive Director Bradley, Authority General Counsel Thorson, and Authority Secretary Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. AUTHORITY BUSINESS 1. ADDrOYal of the Minutes _ _ 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 9, 1997 Due to a conflict of interest because of property ownership in Old Town, Authority Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. MOTION: Authority Member Lindemans moved for the approval of the December 9, 1997, minutes. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Authority Member Stone who ~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORTS None given. Minutes. WlA\121697 Temecula Westside Improvement Authori~ 1 ADJOURNMENT At 7:32 P.M., this meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 13, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Steven J. Ford, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary [SEAL] Minutes. WlA\ 121697 2 ITEM NO. 2 CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE '~.~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager January 13, 1998 Financing for Westside Area Public Improvements and Open-Space Acquisition, and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution described below. RESOLUTION NO. 98-._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY BACKGROUND: California Government Code requires that, prior to the formation by a public agency of any community facilities district that will finance improvements to be owned and operated by another public agency, the public agencies enter into a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement. The Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") has undertaken proceedings to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "CFD"), and it is proposed that the CFD finance various public improvements to be owned and operated by the City, all as specified in a proposed Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the City and the Authority. The form of the agreement is on file with the City Clerk, and City Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement and that it be executed and delivered by the City Manager, so that the Authority can proceed with the formation of the CFD. FISCAL IMPACT: Attachments: Resolution Joint Community Facilities Agreement P: I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA IJ344~. I/VPD REfilOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MECULA APPROVING A JOINT COMMUNITY FACH,ITIES AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY WltigR~AS, the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") intends to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") in order to finance certain public improvements in the Westside area of the City of Ternecula (the "City"), open space acquisitions and to finance a portion of the costs of the Westem Bypass, and some of the public improvements to be financed will be owned and/or operated, when completed, by the City (the "Public Improvements"); and Wreath&S, in order to enable the District to finance the Public Improvements, Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with respect to the Public Improvements prior to the formation of the District; and WltlgREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement, by and between the City and the Authority (the "Agreement") has been filed with the City Clerk and the City Council now desires to approve the Agreement and direct its execution and delivery. NOW, THe:BEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: A. Approval of Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Agreement, in the form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreement in such form together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the City of the Agreement. The City Council hereby declares that the Agreement will he beneficial to the residents of the City. B. Official Actions. The City Manager, Finance Director, Director of Public Works, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the Agreement or the formation of the District, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all certificates, documents and other i~ts which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. P : I CO ItF. F. MI CFD A ~ A ~E..gO. 2 PAS.~, APPROVk~ AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC 23000.01:J~144 12/30/9'/ P : I CO IlF. Fa~ CI;D A OND A ~62~ $ 0. 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS' ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk P : l CO ~ CFD A GIqD A LI~ $ 0. 2 JOINT COMMUNITY FACHATIES AGREEMENT WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDAL~ AREA) This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of January 13, 1998, is by and between the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") and the City of Temecula (the "Participating Agency"). WITNESSETH: wm~I~AS, the Authority has undertaken proceedings to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "CFD"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code, and to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") under the Act in order to finance various public improvements necessitated by the development of the Westside Area of the City of Temecula and otherwise to finance a portion of the costs of the Western Bypass and open space acquisitions (collectively, the "Project"); and W!t~lz.a_S, the Project includes the construction of the public improvements described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Exhibit is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and ~S, the parties hereto desire that the Participating Agency own and operate the Improvements upon their completion if they comply with the standards and are completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and WItF~AS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which Improvements are to be financed, in part, with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds and the Improvements, all as more particularly set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Reservation of Bond Fund~. The Authority will reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an amount necessary to finance the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and construction of the Improvements which are not being funded from other sources, as determined by the Public Works Director of the Participating Agency. Said amount, together P : I CO HEF. MI CFD A GblD A t13 441. WPD P : I CO HEEMl CFD A GND A tI 3441. WP D with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in the Improvement Fund established for the CFD (the "Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amount shall in no way be pledged as security for the Bonds. Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Section 2. Consauction of Impmverrl~nts. The Authority shall cause the Improvements to be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency. All construction shall be done by independent contractors, and neither the Participating Agency nor the Authority shall have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in connection therewith; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities other than the Authority in respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements. Section 3. Inspec_ fion and Accep_ ~: Use of Bond FundE. The Participating Agency shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion of such construction to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and responsibility of operation, of the Improvements. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any of the Improvements. Following the acceptance by the Participating Agency of the Improvements, the Authority shall disburse the proceeds of the Bonds described in Section 1 above to pay or reimburse payment of the costs thereof. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Authority may disburse such amounts to pay costs of construction of the Improvements prior to completion of all of the Improvements, if it determines that such disbursement is permissible under the Act and will reduce the overall costs of construction of the Improvements. Section 4. Limited Obligatiolls. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund and identified in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable hereunder. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder shall be to inspect and accept the Improvements as described in Section 3 above. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to their acceptaw~ by the Participating Agency. If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the commencement of an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations. P : l C O I-IF. FA~ ~ A GI~ A tI$ 441. WP D P : I CO ~ CFD A173KI A t I $ 441. WP D Section $. ~dlIliaali~. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the Bonds are not issued by December 31, 1998. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements by the Participating Agency, and disbursement from the Improvement Fund of the amount described in Section 1 above by the Authority to pay or reimburse a portion of the total costs of the Improvements. Section 6. No Obligation to Form CFD: Agreement of Benefit to Residents. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, by their respective approvals of this Agreement, the Authority and the Participating Agency have each declared and hereby confirm that this Agreement is beneficial to the residents of the City in assuring the provision of financing for a portion of the costs of the Improvements in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Section 7. Partial InvalidiF. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein. Section 9. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. be executed in IN WlTNF_SS W!~g!~OF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature below. P : % CO HI?F. MI CI;D A GND A tI$441. WPD P : I CO ~ CI~D A GND A tI$441. WPD Date of Execution: January 13, 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Participating Agency") By: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Date of Execution: January 13, 1998 WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY (the "AuthOrity") By: Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE Secretary P:ICOI-IF.F. M1C~'DAGNDAtL~441. WPDP:ICOH£F.M~CFDAGNDA~.I$441. WPD EXHIBIT A IMPROVEMENTS TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT TO BE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. P:ICOHEEMICFDAGNDA IJ3441. WPDP:ICOHEEMICFDAGNDA ~J3441. WPD CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE' CITY MANAGER WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Authority Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director January 13, 1998 Financing for Westside Area Public Improvements and Open-Space Acquisition, and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors conduct concurrent public hearings on (i) the formation of the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") and the levy of special taxes therein, and (ii) the issuance of bonded indebtedness of the Authority for the District. The Board of Directors should: (a) open the public hearings, (b) accept any written protests and take any oral testimony, (c) determine that certain land initially included in the boundaries of the District should be removed from the District, that maintenance of open space will not be funded by the District and whether or not transient occupancy taxes and/or sales taxes arising from development in the District will be used to offset special taxes levied by the District, (d) close the public hearings, (e) adopt the resolutions described as 1, 2 and 3 below, (f) hold the election called pursuant to the resolution listed as 3 below, (g) adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election, and (h) have the first reading of the ordinance described below. The Resolutions proposed for adoption and the ordinance proposed for a first reading are as follows: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT P: I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA tJ3446. WPD 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT . Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION , Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN 5. Have the first reading of an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) BACKGROUND: The Authority was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City and the Redevelopment Agency to assist in the financing of: (a) public improvements in the Westside area of the City, (b) certain open space acquisitions, and (c) a portion of the costs of the Western Bypass. On December 9, 1997, the Authority adopted two resolutions of intention relative to a proposed community facilities district (the "District"). The resolutions of intention called for public hearings on the formation of the District, the levy of special taxes therein and the issuance of bonded indebtedness for the District, and provided that the public hearings called pursuant to the resolutions of intention would be held on January 13, 1998. The Secretary of the Authority has published notice of the hearings in accordance with applicable law. P:I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA lJ3446. WPD The Board of Directors will hold the public hearings concurrently. At the hearings, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of the specified types of facilities to be financed by the District and the issuance of bonds for the District must be heard. Any person interested is authorized to file a protest in writing. As the land proposed to be included in the District is all owned by John Firestone and there are no registered voters residing in the proposed District, only Mr. Firestone has legal standing to formally protest the formation or any particular aspects of the District. A report has been filed by the Director of Public Works of the City with the Authority Secretary, as required by the resolutions of intention, indicating the proposed boundaries of the District, the facilities to be financed by the District and the estimated costs thereof. The land to be included in the District will only include land owned by John Firestone which is expected to be conveyed to or leased by Trigger Entertainment and Sports LLC ("Trigger"). Mr. Firestone and Trigger have requested that certain land included within the original boundary map of the District now be excluded from the District, and a revised boundary map for the District with such land excluded has been filed with the Secretary. The Board of Directors should acknowledge, at the public hearings, the exclusion of such land that was originally within the District boundaries. During the public hearings, the Board of Directors also needs to consider the possible use of a portion of the transient occupancy taxes and sales taxes arising from the facilities to be constructed in the District, as an offset to the special taxes to be levied in the District. The Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Taxes for the District will need to include language to provide for such an offset, if the Board of Directors decides that such a contribution of City funds is appropriate. Later City Council action will be needed to fully implement any such contribution. In any event, the Board of Directors needs to determine the matter of whether or not transient occupancy taxes and sales taxes will be used as offsets to special taxes prior to the close of the public hearings. Also prior to the close of the public hearings, the Board of Directors should acknowledge that the District will not be used to fund the maintenance of any open space acquired with District funds. It is expected that Trigger will fund an endowment for the maintenance of the open space, so that the cost of maintenance need not be included in the taxing powers of the District. Following the closing of the public hearings, Trigger has requested that the Authority take the actions necessary to officially form the District, to authorize the levy of special taxes in the District and to authorize the incurrence of bonded indebtedness by the District. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt resolutions of formation and of necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, and calling a special election of the landowner in the District. A ballot for the election has already been delivered to the eligible landowner voter, and is expected to have been returned to the City Clerk, acting as Secretary of the Authority, prior to January 13th. By law, the landowner is given one vote for each acre of land or portion thereof that he owns within the boundaries of the District. As stated above, the only eligible voter is John Firestone, as the owner of all of the land within the boundaries of the District, as such boundaries are indicated on the amended boundary map for the District on file with the Authority Secretary. The City Clerk, as Secretary to the Authority, will be requested to canvass the election immediately after adoption of the resolution calling the election. P: I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA kl3446. WPD If two thirds or more of the votes cast are in favor of the District, the Authority is then requested to adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election and providing for the recording of a notice of special tax lien with the County Recorder. The notice provides all future property owners with knowledge of the existence of the Authority's special taxing powers. The Authority is then requested to have the first reading of an ordinance levying special taxes. The ordinance permits special taxes to be levied only on property located in the District. It is expected that special taxes will be levied to pay debt service on bonds proposed to be issued for the District. Staff expects that a resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds and approving the related legal documents will be presented to the Authority on or after January 27th. Attachments: Resolutions (4) Ordinance Notice of Special Tax Lien P: I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA IJ3448. WPD RESOLUTION NO. WIA 95- A RF, SOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (RogersDale Area), AUTHOIHZING ~ I.F. VY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN ~ DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARH.Y ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING I.EVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF APPROPRIATIONS I.IMIT TOTHE QU~tl~o ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT ~EAS, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part I of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and wm~F. AS, the Resolution of Intention, imorporating a map of the proposed boundaries of the District and stating the facilities and services to be provided, the estimated maximum cost of providing such facilities and services, and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with respect to the District, is on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHlq:REAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held a public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed formation of the District; and WH~AS, at said hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the facilities to be provided therein and the levy of said special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WI:~REAS, at said hearing evidence was presented to this Board of Directors on said matters before it, including a report by the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula (the "Report") as to the facilities to be provided through the District and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of Directors at the conclusion of said hearing is fully advised in the premises; and WHE~AS, at the request of the proponent of the District, the Board of Directors determined at the public hearing to exclude certain territory from the District, and a revised boundary map for the District (the "Revised Map") has been prepared which reflects only that territory to now be included in the District and which Revised Map is on file with the Secretary, and the Board of Directors determined at the public hearing that no services are intended to be funded by the District; and P : I COHEF. MI CFD A GiYDA ~F.$0 . 5 wm~'AS, written protests with respect to the formation of the District, the furnishing of specified types of facilities and the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes have not been filed with the Secretary by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within tbe t~rritory of fig District or property owners of one-half (~,~) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and WiqEREAS, the special tax proposed to be levied in the District to pay for the proposed facilities to be provided therein, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (~fi) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and Wiql~,EAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, it was determined that the territory to be included in the District be revised to be as reflected in the Revised Map, and the Rate and Method of Apportionment be revised to be as reflected in Exhibit A hereto, copies of which Revised Map and Exhibit have been provided to the representatives of the landowner in the District. NOW, Tme.~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The proposed special tax to be levied within the District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Act. Section 3. All prior proceedings taken by this Board of Directors in connection with the establishment of the District and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the requirements of the Act. On December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted Local Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts, and this Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the District is in conformity with said goals and policies. Section 4. The community facilities district designated "Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)" is hereby established pursuant to the Act. Section 5. The boundaries of the District, as set forth in the Map of the District heretofore recorded in the Riverside County Recorder's Office in Book 42 at Page 63 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, are hereby revised to reflect the boundaries shown in the Revised Map. The Revised Map is hereby approved, is incorporated herein by reference and shall be the boundaries of the District. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record the Revised Map with the County Recorder as soon as practicable following the adoption of this Resolution. P: I COHEEM! CI:D A (~ND A ~E$O. 5 Section 6. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those items listed as facilities on Exhibit A to the Resolution of Intention and by this reference incorporated herein (the "Facilities"). No services will be Ended by the District. Section 7. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to finance the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be levied annually within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the District, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the probable maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 8. It is hereby found and determined that the Facilities are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development occurring in the District. Section 9. The Director of Finance of the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6430 is the officer which will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Act. Section 10. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the Authority ceases. Section 11. In accordance with Section 53325.7 of the Act, the annual appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, of the District is hereby preliminarily established at $10,000,000 and said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the voters of the District as hereafter provided. The proposition establishing said annual appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors voting thereon and shall be adjusted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 53325.7 of the Act. Section 12. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election the time, place and conditions of which election shall be as specified by a separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Section 13. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. P : I COI~F.M~ CKD A (~ND A ~RI~$O. $ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk Authority Secretary P:ICOHEF. MI~AGJTDAIRE$0.5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, Authority Secretary/City Clerk P : I CO ltNFa~ CFD A GNDA II~$O. $ EXHIBIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Treasurer of the Authority (the "Treasurer") through the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied will b.e subject to the same penalties and.procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX The maximum special tax that may be levied commencing with the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1998 and for each following Fiscal Year on any Parcel shall not exceed the sum off plus (i) (ii) The maximum building special tax rate of $9.00 per building square foot, multiplied by the sum of the Building Floor Area for .all buildings on the Parcel; The maximum land special tax rate of $3.00 per land square foot, multiplied by the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax shall be levied annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government Code. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES: On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special tax on the County's secured tax roll, the Treasurer shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Property. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1 and on the status of the buildings in the District as of the March 1 preceding such July 1. LEVY: The Treasurer shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1, and levy of each Parcel of Taxable Property as provided below. Step 1 :. Determine the Building Floor Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 2: Calculate the annum building special tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 80% of the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3: Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of: (i) the annual building special tax rate calculated in Step 2 above; or (ii) the maximum building special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4: Determine the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 5: Calculate the annual land special tax rate as the lesser off (i) the Special Tax Liability, less the total amount calculated for all Parcels under step 3 above, divided by the total Land Area for all Parcels which are Taxable Property; or (ii) the maximum land special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 6: Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, by the annual' land special tax rate determined under Step 5, above. Step 7: Calculate the sum of the annual building special tax (from Step 3) and the annual land special tax (from Step 6) for each Parcel which is Taxable Property. PREPAYMENTS Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Treasurer in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. Determination of the total amount needed by the Treasurer shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel. The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Treasurer, as follows: ..\CFD lrogcrsdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A2 1. Compute the special tax for the then current Fiscal Year for such Parcel and the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. 2. The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all Parcels for the then current Fiscal Year, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special taxes for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). 3. The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount off (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Treasurer to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Treasurer to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFINITIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel, any fees of the County or the City related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allotable share of the salaries of the Authority and/or City staff directly related thereto, a proportionate amount of Authority and/or City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority, from its own funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the ease of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. ..\CFD lrogersdal¢ Friday, January 02, 1998 A3 Building Floor Area means the area, by square feet rounded up to the nearest whole integer, included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of a multiple story building, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Treasurer by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Treasurer shall determine applicable. City means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. District means the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area). Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of Bonds. Treasurer is the Treasurer of the Authority, who is also the Finance Director of the City. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Treasurer, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District which is not otherwise exempt from the special tax pursuant to law, except that the following property shall ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A4 not be taxed: any acres of' land (up to an aggregate of the first 20.0 acres first so designate.~l by the Treasurer) which is a public right of. way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement, or which is owned by a government entity or agency. Taxable Property includes Parcels owned by a public agency if the public agency has granted a leasehold or possessory interest therein to a non-exempt person or entity. ..\CFD lrogersda!¢ Friday, January 02, 1998 A5 RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A ~LlYrION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DETER_MINING ~ NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS W~TH~N ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVF. M~NT AUTHORITY COMMUNrFY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) AND SUBMI'rrL~IG PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED I~I.F~CTORS OF ~ DISTRICT Wiqlq~S, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and ~REAS, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness") stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the District for the purpose of financing the costs of certain facilities specified in the Resolution of Intention; and WHERFAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District, the provision of facilities and services by the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the costs of the services, the facilities and the principal and interest on the proposed indebtedness and the administrative costs of the City relative to the District; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the provision of said facilities (the "Facilities") and services and the levy of the special tax on property within the District were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and wm~'AS, at said hearing, the Board of Directors determined to eliminate the funding of services by the District, and to eliminate certain territory from the District as shown in a revised boundary map for the District on file with the Secretary; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said heating, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District" (the "Resolution of Formation"); and P : I C O HE F. M ~ CFD A GND A II~ SO. 4 WI~REAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held the rescheduled public hearing relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness; and WI~gREAS, no written protests with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness have been filed with the City Clerk. NOW, Tm~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. This Board of Directors deems it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000 within the boundaries of the District. Section 3. The indebtedness is incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, as provided in the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling bonds to finance the Facilities and the costs of the Authority in establishing and administering the District. Section 4. The whole of the District shall pay for the bonded indebtedness through the levy of the special tax. The tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the formula set forth in Exhibit ~A" to the Resolution of Formation. Section 5. The maximum amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred is $30,000,000 and the maximum term of the bonds to be issued shall in no event exceed forty (40) years. Section 6. The bonds shall bear interest at rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by this Board of Directors or its designee at the time or times of sale of said bonds. Section 7. The proposition of incurring the bonded indebtedness herein authorized shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District and shall be consolidated with elections on the proposition of levying special taxes within the District and the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District pursuant to Section 53353.5 of the Act. The time, place and conditions of said election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. P : I COHF. F. MI CFD A GblD A IR~SO. 4 PASSIm, APPROVED AND ADOI'FF, D, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk Authority Secretary 23000.01:I342/ 12/30/97 P : I CO iClF. F. MI CI~D A GND A h~ ~0. 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) $$ I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, Authority Secretary/ City Clerk P : ~COHF_.F211CFDAGNDA IR£$0. 4 RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98-_ A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTO~ OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEM]ENT AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION WI~F~REAS, on this date, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. I (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the DistricC (the ~Resolution of Formation"), ordering the formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the District and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District; WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within The Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)" (the "Resolution to Incur Indebtedness"), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000 upon the security of said special tax to be levied within the District; and WFtEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of said resolutions, the propositions of the levy of said special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District as required by Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Tire 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"). NOW, Ti~F. REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Sections 53326, 53351 and 53325.7 of the Act, the issues of the levy of said special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election called therefor as provided below. Section 2. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Act, the three propositions described in paragraph 1 above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A~ and by this reference incorporated herein. Said form of ballot is hereby approved. Section 3. This Board of Directors hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory of the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Board of Directors for the purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Board of Directors finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners P:%¢OHBF. MICFDAC~VDA ~.I within the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners or their authorized representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the District as of the dose of said public hearings. Section 4. This Board of Directors hereby calls a special election to consider the measures described in paragraph 2 above, which election shall be held in the Temecula City Council Chambers immediately following adoption of this Resolution. The Secretary is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the Secretary has on file the Resolution of Formation, a certified map of the revised boundaries of the District, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to determine the boundaries of the District. The voted ballots shall be returned to the Secretary no later than immediately following the adoption of this Resolution; and when all of the qualified voters have voted the election shall be closed. Section $. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by hand-delivered ballot pursuant to Section 4000 of the C. alifomia Elections Code. This Board of Directors hereby finds that paragraphs (a), (b), (c) (1) and (c)(3) of said Section 4000 are applicable to this special election. Section 6. This Board of Directors acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered to each of the qualified electors of the District a ballot in the form set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. Each ballot indicates the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner to which it pertains. Each ballot was accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and rerum of the ballot. The envelope to be used to return the ballot was enclosed with the ballot, had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the landowner, Co) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration pursuant to clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board. Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures are hereby waived, as provided in Section 53327 of the Act. Section 7. The Secretary shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors in the Temecula City Council Chambers upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether said ballots be personally delivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available ballots which may be marked at said location on the election day by said qualified electors. Section 8. This Board of Directors hereby further finds that the provision of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified electors of the District. Them is on file with the Secretary a written petition executed by all of the qualified electors of the District requesting a shortening of the time for said special election to expedite the P : I C O ~ CFD A GND A IRI?,~O.1 process of formation of the District and waiving any requirement for analysis and arguments in connection with the election. Accordingly, this Board of Directors finds and determines that said qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and waiver of analysis and arguments, and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Board of Directors also finds and determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election. Section 9. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish in a newspaper of general circulation circulating within the District a copy of this resolution and a copy of the Resolution to Incur Indebtedness, as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk Authority Secretary 23000.01:J342~ 12/30/9'/ P : ~ GO I'~ F.M ~ CI:D A CrlV'D A W~F.80.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98-.~ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, Authority Secretary/ City Clerk P d CO I-IF. EMI CFD A C, ND A ~80.1 EXHIBIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACIIXI'~S DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDAI,E AREA) OFFICIAL BALLOT SPECIAL TAX ELECTION (January 13, 1998) This ballot is for a special, landowrer election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed postage paid envelope to the office of the Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority no later than immediately after adoption of the resolution of the Board of Directors calling said election on January 13, 1998, either by mail or in persort The Secretary's office is located at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92~90. To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting life after the word "YES" or after the word "NO". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority and obtain another. BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Westside Improvement Authority imur an indebtedness and issue bonds in the maximum aggregate primipal amount of $30,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), tbe proceeds of which will be used to fimrr~ certain public improvements described in the proceedings to form the District; shall a special tax payable solely from ~ within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the costs of facilities autboriz~ to be rimmed by the District, and the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the City of Temecula and the Authority in administering the District, and shall the arereal appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $10,000,0007 No: By execution in the space provided below, you also (a) certify that you are the fee title owner (or the duly authorized represerlafive of the fee title owner) of thc Riverside County Asscssors Parcels indicated below, (b) ir~catc your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the California Govemnent Code, ~ (c) acknowledge that there will be no services funded by the District, and that the boundaries of the District will include only that territory set forth on the revised boundary map for the District, a copy of which has been fumisbed to you. Number of Votes: County Assessor's Parcels Owned by Property Owner: 128 940-310-013; 940-310-044; 940-310-045; 940-310-046; 940-310-047; 940-310-048; 940-320-001; 940-320-002; 940-320-003; and 940-320-004 By: John F. Firestor~ P : % CO ItEF. M~ CFD A GND A IRE$0.1 RESOLI. rrION NO. WIA 95- A RF. SOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN W!~2RE&S, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Board of Directors pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"), this Board of Directors on this date adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Calling Special Election", calling for a special election of the qualified electors within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said resolution, which are by this reference incorporated herein, said special election was held on this date, and the Secretary has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WI~REAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed said canvass and hereby approves it. NOW, T!~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The issues presented at said special election were the incurring of a bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000, the levy of a special tax within the District to be levied in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment heretofore approved by this Board of Directors by its resolution adopted this date entified "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District", and the approval of an annual appropriations limit of not to exceed $10,000,000 pursuant to said resolution. Section 2. Pursuant to said Canvass on file with the Secretary, the issues presented at said special election were approved by the qualified electors of the District by more than two-thirds of the votes cast at said special election. Section 3. Pursuant to said voter approval, the District is hereby declared to he fully formed with the authority to incur bonded indebtedness and to levy special taxes as heretofore provided in these proceedings and in the Act. Section 4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this Board of Directors with respect to the District were valid and in conformity with the Act. Section $. The Secretary is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a notice of special tax lien in the form P:~CO~CFDAG~TDAh~O.$ required by the Act, said recording to occur no later than fifteen days following adoption by the Board of Directors of this Resolution. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/City Clerk Authority Secretary 23000.01:J3426 12/30/9'/ P : I COlfEEM~ ~ A ~I~ A ~F.~. $ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, Authority Secretary/ City Clerk P : ~ C OI-II~1~ CI~ A GND A b~,.~0. 3 EXInltlT A CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF EI.F~CTION WESTSIDE IMPROVEME~ AUTHORITY Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) I hereby certify that on January 13, 1998, I canvassed the returns of the election held on January 13, 1998, in the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) and the total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes east for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct: Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) Special Tax Election, January 13, 1998. Qualified Votes Landowner Cast Votes 128 YES NO B,4flOTMFASURE: Shall the Westside Improvement Authority incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $30,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Westside Improvement Authority Community Fac'dities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), the proceeds of which will be used to finance certain public improvements described in the proceedings to form the District; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to pay for the cost of facilities authorized to be financed by the District, and the principal and interest upon such bonds and the costs of the City of Temecula and the Authority in administering the District, and shah the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $10,000,0007 IN ~ WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 13th day of January, 1998. By: Secretary, Westside Improvement Authority P.'~ COHEE~ CFDA GtVDA hV~.,.nO. $ ORDINANCE NO. WIA 98- AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SPEC~ TAXES ~ ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALF. AREA) wm~AS, on December 9, 1997, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to establish the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District") pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"), to finance certain facilities and services (the "Facilities" and the "Services," respectively); WI~~&S, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the Facilities and Services; ~S, this Board of Directors has held a noticed public hearing as required by Act relative to the detemaination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance a portion of the costs of the Facilities and Services; Wm~AS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, a community facilities district report was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held; WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors eliminated the funding of the Services and some of the territory from the District; WHEREAS, also subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Formation of Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District" (the "Resolution of Formation"), "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)" and "A Resolution the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority Calling Special Election", which resolutions established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax with the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively; and WHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which the eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. P : % CO HEF-.M~ C~;D A GI~ A I ORD . NOW, Tm~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rates and in accordance with the method of apportionment set forth in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Formation (the "Rme and Method of Apportionment"). The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 1998-99 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds of the Authority issued for the District (the "Bonds"), payment of all costs of the Facilities to be paid with such funds, and payment of all costs administering the District. Section 2. The Finance Director of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 3. Properties or entities of the State, federal or local govemments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes, to the extent set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 4. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, the Rate and Method of Apportionment, and in the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the replenishment of the reserve fund for the Bonds, the payment of the costs of the Facilities, the payment of the costs of the Authority in administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. Section $. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the secured real property tax roll in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of Riverside and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Finance Director of the City may collect one or more installments of the special taxes by means of direct billing by the Authority of the property owners within the District, if, in the judgment of the Finance Director, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. In such event, the special taxes shall become delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners. P:ICO~CFDAGNDA~ORD. Whether the special taxes are levied in the manner provided in the first or the second preceding paragraph, the special taxes shall have the same lien prioriF, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. Section 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. Section 7. The Chairperson shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Temecula. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvemere Authority at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of January, 1998. Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] P : I CO I'~ F_.M I CI;D A C, ND A I ORD. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Ternecula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. ~ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 27th day of January, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of January, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOF_.,S: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE Authority Secretary/City Clerk P:IGO~CFDAGIVDAIORD. RECORDING REQUF~TED BY AND AFTER RECORDATION RETURN TO: Secretary Westside Improvement Authority P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACH,ITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROC. ERSD.$1.~'. AREA) Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and the Mello-Roos Community. Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, Section 53311, et. seq., of the California Government Code' (the "Act"), the undersigned Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority"), County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the Board of Directors of the Authority, County of Riverside, State of California. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the .purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds of which are being used to finance the public facilities described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, and otherwise to pay the costs of such facilities directly, and the costs of administering the below-mentioned community facilities district. The special tax is authorized to be levied within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. I (RogersDale Area), which has now been officially formed and the lien of the special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied, and canceled in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the California Government Code. The rate, meflxxi of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special tax is as set forth in Exhibit B aRached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Conditions under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien of the special tax canceled are as set forth in said Exhibit B. Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all nonexempt real property within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area), in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The name(s) of the owner(s) and the assessor's tax parcel number(s) of the real property included within this community facilities district and not exempt from the special tax are as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Reference is made to the first amended boundary map of the community facilities district recorded at Book ~ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page , in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which map is the boundary map of the community facilities district. For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property or interests therein subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Director of Finance of the City of Temeeula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6430. Dated: ,1998 Authority Secretary Westside Improvement Authority EX!:HRIT A WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACHJTIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (RO~ERSDALE AREA) DESCRIPI'ION OF FACH,ITIES TO BE FINANCED BY ~ DISTRICT FACILITIES The planned public improvements include the following: acquisition of open space, acquisition and/or construction of the Western By-Pass corridor, portions of Vincent Moraga Drive, portions of Ridge Park Drive, and portions of Hrst Street. The improvements shall include all related clearing and grubbing, grading and appurtenances, and any removals or temporary signage or markings related thereto. All improvements may include any rights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, locating and/or relocating utilities, landscaping, lighting, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the rights-of-way. The planned public improvements include the acquisition and/or construction of parking facilities, including land acquisition, easement acquisition, entitlement acquisition, grading, site fencing, street improvements (including any fights-of-way acquisition, intersection improvements, widening, paving and/or re-paving, striping and/or re-striping, pedestrian sidewalks, locating and/or relocating utilities, or other related improvements or appurtenances located within the fights-of-way), storm drains (including trenching, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, manholes, headwalls, junctions, transitions, bedding, culverts, and appurtenances), landscaping improvements, site concrete, iron works, gas line repair, curbing, gutters, sidewalks, striping, traffic signals, street lights, light fixtures, and site electrical, all within or in the vicinity of the District. The facilities shall include all costs of engineering, design, fees, permits, bonds, supervision, planning, construction staking, materials testing and coordination incident thereto. The facilities shall include land acquisition related to any public improvement, and other land acquisition for public purposes (including but not limited to open space and land for future public improvements). Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, financial advisor, appraisals, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond counsel, underwriter's counsel, special tax consultant, bond and official statement printing and all other incidental expenses. EXItlBIT B WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by the Treasurer of the Authority (the "Treasurer") through the application of the following procedures. All of the property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by the express provisions of the rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner provided below. It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, and that special taxes so levied will be subject to the same penalties and .procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial foreclosure with respect thereto in any Fiscal Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX The maximum special tax that may be levied commencing with the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1998 and for each following Fiscal Year on any Parcel shall not exceed the sum of: plus (i) (ii) The maximum building special tax rate of $9.00 per building square foot, multiplied by the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel; The maximum land special tax rate of $3.00 per land square foot, multiplied by the Land Area of the Parcel. The special tax shall be levied annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the California Government Code. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES: On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the special tax on the County's secured tax roll, the Treasurer shall determine for each Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Property. Parcels subject to levy shall be determined based upon the records of the Cotmty Assessor as of the January 1 preceding such July 1 and on the status of the buildings in the District as of the March 1 preceding such July 1. LEVY: The Treasurer shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1, and levy of each Parcel of Taxable Property as provided below. Step 1:. Determine the Building Floor Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 2: Calculate the annual building special tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 80% of the Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 3: Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable Property by the lesser of: (i) the annual building special tax rate calculated in Step 2 above; or (ii) the maximum building special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 4: Determine the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property and the total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property. Step 5: Calculate the annual land special tax rate as the lesser of: (i) the Special Tax Liability, less the total amount calculated for all Parcels under step 3 above, divided by the total Land Area for all Parcels which are Taxable Property; or (ii) the maximum land special tax rate, respectfully, for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1. Step 6: Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property, by the annual land special tax rate determined under Step 5, above. Step 7: Calculate the sum of the annual building special tax (from Step 3) and the annual land special tax (from Step 6) for each Parcel which is Taxable Property. PREPAYMENTS Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the Treasurer in writing of such intention not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date for the Bonds and the prepayment must be made not less than 45 days prior to such interest payment. Determination of the total amount needed by the Treasurer shall be conclusive, absent manifest error. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a particular Parcel. The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Treasurer, as follows: ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A2 1. Compute the special tax for the then current Fiscal Year for such Parcel and the total special tax for the then current Fiscal Year. 2. The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by the total special tax for all Parcels for the then current Fiscal Year, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000); provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special taxes for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000). 3. The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a) increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Treasurer to offset any difference between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Treasurer to pay for the applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment. The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with respect to that Parcel have been paid. DEFINITIONS Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority in carrying out its duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel, any fees of the County or the City related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and/or City staff directly related thereto, a proportionate amount of Authority and/or City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority, from its own funds with respect to the District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent Agreement and, in the case of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of the District. Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance. ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A3 Building Floor Area means the area, by square feet rounded up to the nearest whole integer, included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building, including each floor of a multiple story building, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the Treasurer by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such documentation as the Treasurer shall determine applicable. City means the City of Temecula. County means the County of Riverside. Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments. District means the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area). Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time. Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30. Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County. Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of Bonds. Treasurer is the Treasurer of the Authority, who is also the Finance Director of the City. Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by the Treasurer, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto. Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District which is not otherwise exempt from the special tax pursuant to law, except that the following property shall ..\CFD 1 rogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A4 not be taxed: any acres of land (up to an aggregate of the first 20.0 acres first so designated by the Treasurer) which is a public right of way or which is an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement, or which is owned by a government entity or agency. Taxable Property includes Parcels owned by a public agency if the public agency has granted a leasehold or possessory interest therein to a non-exempt person or emity. ..\CFD lrogersdale Friday, January 02, 1998 A5 EXItmlT C WESTSIDE IMPRO~NT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGERSDAT,F, AREA) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNER OF LAND WITHIN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ~OC.~~.~T~,~ AREA) Assessor's Parcel No~. Name of Prooer~v Owner 940-310-013; 940-310-044; 940-310-045; 940-310-046; 940-310-047; 940-310-048; 940-320-001; 940-320-002; 940-320-003; and 940-320-004 John F. Firestone 10392 Ladera Senda Santa Ana, California 92705 ITEM NO. 3 CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Authority Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director January 13, 1998 Westside Improvement Authority's Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) - Expansion of List of Facilities Eligible to be Financed RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the resolution: RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF CONSIDERATION TO ALTER THE FACILITIES TO BE FINANCED BY THE WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (ROGERSDALE AREA) BACKGROUND: The California Government Code requires that, prior to the adoption of a resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by a community facilities district to include facilities that will be owned and operated by another public agency, the public agencies enter into a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement. The Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") has undertaken proceedings to form the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. I (RogersDale Area) (the "CFD"), and it is proposed that the CFD finance various public improvements to be owned and operated by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Rancho California Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District. It is expected that joint community facilities agreements will be executed between the Authority and one or more of such other public agencies in the next 30 days. The process to include any facilities referenced in such agreements in the list of facilities eligible to be financed by the CFD requires that a public hearing be held not less than 30 days after adoption of a resolution of consideration to alter the facilities to be financed by the CFD. In order to avoid any delay in completing the procedural requirements for the CFD, staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt a resolution of consideration of alteration of CFD facilities at this time, with the expectation that joint community facilities agreements will be executed, and the related facilities will then be eligible for inclusion in the facilities to be P:. i COHEEMI CFDA GNDA IJ3459. WPD financed by the CFD, prior to the February 24, 1998 date on which the public hearing called for in the resolution of consideration is to be held. All costs related to any such joint community facilities agreements will be paid for by the CFD or from contributions by Trigger Entertainment and Sports LLC. Attachments: Resolution No. WIA 98- P:I COHEEMI CFDA GNDA IJ3459. WPD RESOLUTION NO. WIA 98- A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRF_ASTORS OF ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY OF CONSIDERATION TO ALTER ~ FACHATIES TO BE FINANCED BY ~ WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACHATIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ROGF, RSDA !,~ AREA) WHEREAS, on this date, the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") adopted a resolution forming the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and WIH~REAS, the proponent of the District, Trigger Entertainment and Sports LLC, has proposed that the District finance certain flood control, water system and sewer improvements (the "Additional Improvements") that are expected to be owned, upon completion, by the Riverside County Hood Control and Water Consentation District, the Rancho California Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District, respectively (collectively, the "Participating Agencies"); and WI~REAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with any entity that will own public improvements to be financed by the District prior to the adoption of a resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by the District to include such facilities; and WI~gREAS, the Authority anticipates entering into one or more joint community facilities agreements with one or more of the Participating Agencies during the next thirty days; and WHigRF_,AS, the Authority now desires to undertake proceedings to alter the facilities to be financed by the District in order to be in a position to adopt a resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by the District as soon as possible following the execution of such joint community facilities agreements. NOW, TI~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that the facilities to be financed by the District be altered. Section 2. The name of the District is "Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)." Section 3. The territory included in the District is as shown on the first amended boundary map of the District on file in the office of the Secretary of the Authority. P:ICOI'~P. M1CFDAGNDALI.9458. WPD Section 4. It is proposed that the facilities to be financed by the District be altered to include flood control, water system and sewer improvements within or in the vicinity of the District to be owned and/or operated by one or more of the Participating Agencies, including all related appurtenances and design, engineering and other related costs. The specific facilities to be included shall be specified in joint community facilities agreements to be entered into by the Authority and the Participating Agencies prior to adoption of the resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by the District to include all or a portion of the Additional Improvements. Section 5. Tuesday, February 24, 1998, at 7:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of the Authority, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where the Board of Directors of the Authority, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed alteration to the facilities to be financed by the District. Section 6. The City Clerk in her capacity as Secretary to the Authority, is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for said hearing. Said notice shall be in the form of Exhibit A hereto. Section 7. The officers and employees of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSE~, APPROVEI) AND AI)O~, by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of January, 1998. ATTEST: Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC Authority Secretary P:ICOttEF. M~CFDA(~NDAtI.~458. WPD STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Westside Improvement Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. WIA 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, Authority Secretary/City Clerk P : ~ CO It~ F-.M ~ CI~D A GND A U'3 4 5 & EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBI~C HE~C. WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY Community Facilities District NO. 1 (ROGERSDALE AREA) Notice is hereby given that on January 13, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority adopted a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority of Consideration to Alter the Facilities to be Financed by the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)." Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act") the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority hereby gives notice as follows: A. The text of said Resolution of Consideration is as follows: wm~AS, on this date, the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority (the "Authority") adopted a resolution forming the Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area) (the "District"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"); and WI:nZ~REAS, the proponent of the District, Trigger Entertainment and Sports LLC, has proposed that the District finance certain flood control, water system and sewer improvements (the "Additional Improvements") that are expected to be owned, upon completion, by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Rancho California Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District, respectively (collectively, the "Participating Agencies"); and WHEREAS, Section :53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with any entity that will own public improvements to be financed by the District prior to the adoption of a resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by the District to include such facilities; and Wi~2REAS, the Authority anticipates entering into one or more joint community facilities agreements with one or more of the Participating Agencies during the next thirty days; and WHER~'.~S, the Authority now desires to undertake proceedings to alter the facilities to be financed by the District in order to be in a position to adopt a resolution of change to alter the facilities to be financed by the District as soon as possible following the execution of such joint community facilities agreements. NOW, THI~;itEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Westside Improvement Authority as follows: Section 1. The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that the facilities to be financed by the District be altered. P : t COItF. Fa~ CFD A GI~ A LI.~458. WPD Section 2. The name of the District is "Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (RogersDale Area)." Section 3. The territory included in the District is as shown on the first amended boundary map of the District on file in the office of the Secretary of the Authority. Section 4. It is proposed that the facilities to be financed by the District be altered to include flood control, water system and sewer improvements within or in the vicinity of the District to be owned and/or operated by one or more of the Participating Agencies, including all related appurtenances and design, engineering and other related costs. The specific facilities to be included shall be specified in joint community facilities agreements to be entered into by the Authority and the Participating Agencies prior to adoption of the resolution of change to alter the facilities to be f'manced by the District to include all or a portion of the Additional Improvements. Section 5. Tuesday, February 24, 1998, at 7:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of the Authority, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where the Board of Directors of the Authority, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed alteration to the facilities to be financed by the District. Section 6. The City Clerk in her capacity as Secretary to the Authority, is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for said hearing. Said notice shall be in the form of Exhibit A hereto. Section 7. The officers and employees of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. B. The time and place established under said Resolution of Consideration for the public hearing required under the Act are Tuesday, February 24, 1998, at 7:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of the Authority, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. C. At said heating, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the changing of the facilities to be financed by the District will be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in Section 53336 of the Act. If fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the District, or the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District and not exempt from the special tax file written protests against the proposed alteration of the facilities to be financed by the District and the protests are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors of the Authority shall eliminate the alteration from the proceedings and the alteration shall not be included in a resolution for a period of one year P:lCOlt~F.M~CFDAGNDAtI945& WPD from the date of decision of the Board of Directors of the Authority after the hearing. D. The proposed voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot of the owners of land within the territory included in the District. Dated: ,1998 Publish: , 1998 /s/ June S. Greek Secretary, Westside Improvement Authority P : l CO HEEM~ EFD A (~ND A tI.~45 8. WPD INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ITEM NO. 1 CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~_~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Board of Directors Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director January 13, 1998 Resolution of Industrial Development Authority Declaring the Intention to Issue Bonds RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. IDA 98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. FACILITY. DISCUSSION: The attached resolution expresses the intent of the Industrial Development Authority for the City of Temecula to issue Industrial Development Bonds for NASCAL Interplex, Inc. NASCAL is planning to acquire land in the City for the purpose of constructing a 60,000 square foot facility. They will employ approximately 75 people and will manufacture precision metal parts for use in various high tech and communications equipment. The anticipated investment is $3 million. The amount of bonds will not exceed $4.1 million. FISCAL IMPACT: Industrial Development Bonds are considered conduit financing and do not represent indebtedness of the City or its entities. All bond documents will be presented to the Authority for approval. Attachment: Resolution No. IDA 98-01 R:\SYERSK\STAFFREI~IDBS.VVPD 1/6/98 kg~ RESOLUTION NO. IDA 98-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR NASCAL INTERI LEX, INC. FACHATY WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority") is authorize! to issue bonds pursuant to the provisions of the California Government Code (the Law") for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition, construction and equipping of industrial facilities; and WI~REAS, the Authority may, in the future, desire to issue and sell its revenue bonds (the '~oncls") pursuant to the procedures specified in the Law for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction and equipping by NASCAL Interplex, Inc. (the "Developer") of a manufacturing facility and related and appurtenant facilities consisting of an approximately 55,000 square foot building located on a site in the Westside Business Centre (Lot 2, Tract 24085, Unit 3) in the City of Temecula (the "Project"); and W!iF~S, United States Income Tax Regulations section 1.150-2 provides 8eneraHy that proceeds of tax-exempts debt are not deemed to be expended when such proceeds are used for reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of such debt unless certain procedures are followed, among which is a requirement that (with certain exceptions), prior to the payment of any such expenditure, the issuer must declare an intention to reimburse such expenditure; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest, for the public benefit and in furtherance of the public purposes of the Authority that the Authority declare its official intent to reimburse the expenditures referenced herein from the proceeds of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. The Authority declares its intent to issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the procedures specified in the Law in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,100,000 for the purposes of providing a loan to the Developer to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project. Section 2. The issuance and sale of the Bonds shah be upon such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Authority, the Developer and the purchaser of said Bonds, and shall be authorized by resolution of the Authority at a meeting duly held and conducted for such purpose. Section 3. The Authority hereby declares that it reasonably expects that the Developer will pay certain costs of the Projezzt prior to the date of issuance of the Bonds and that a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be used for reimbursement of expenditures of the Developer for the Project that are paid before the date of issuance of the Bonds. Section 4. The Authority hereby finds that the issuance of the Bonds is a substantial inducement to the Developer to acquire and construct the Project. The Developer shall be responsible for the payment of all present and future costs in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, including but not limited to, any fees and expenses incurred by the Authority in anticipation of the issuance of the Bonds, the costs of printing an official statement, rating agency costs, bond counsel fees and expenses, financial advisor fees and expenses, underwriting discount and costs, trustee fees and expenses, and the cost of printing the Bonds. Section 5. The appropriate officers or staff of the City of Temecula are hereby authorized, for and in the name of and on behalf of the Authority, to make an application to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee and/or the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission for an allocation of private activity bonds or other necessary authority for the issuance of the Bonds and to execute and deliver an appropriate agreement with the Developer with respect to any fees or deposits required in connection therewith. Section 6. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate (i) the Authority to issue bonds to provide financing for the Project; or (ii) the City of Temecula, the Planning Department of the City of Ternecula or any other department of the City of Temecula to approve any application or request for, or take any other action in connection with, any permit or other action necessary for the acquisition and construction of the Projects. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on this 13th day of January, 1998. Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAC] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing IDA Resolution No. IDA 98-01 was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of January, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk/Authority Secretary ITEM 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~C~E._~.~ CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director January 13, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan) Prepared By: John De Gange, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: I · Make a determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. 2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AMENDMENT # 6 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219),THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-020-004, 950-020-009 THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020-029, 955-030-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission considered the project on December 15, 1997 and recommended approval of the project by a 4-0 vote. At the Planning Commission meeting two issues relative to the proposed Specific Plan Amendment were raised and discussed. The first issue, concerning the addition of a provision within the Land Use Development Standards (Section III R:\$TAFFRFI~158PA97.CC1 1/§/95 ~ 1 A. 1 .b. [page 111-9]) which proposes to give the Community Development Director the authority to approve minor variations (deviations) from the standards established in the Specific Plan, without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment, was raised by the Planning Manager as a result of her discussion with a member of the public. The concern is that additional verbiage may be required to specify the types of minor deviations that the Community Development Director would have the authority to approve administratively. In response to this concern it is being proposed that this section be modified with the addition of the following verbiage: 18) "The Director of Community Development may approve minor variations in the standards and design guidelines without requiring an amendment to the Specific Plan as follows: Site Design - Changes in the location of pedestrian pathways and linkages, parking lots, building orientation and lot configuration from the typical examples shown in Figures 14A, 14B, 14C, 42, 43, 44, 45, 50A and 50E. The required elements may not be deleted. Signage - Changes in copy, size materials and color as long as the proposed signage is compatible with the existing signage in Paloma del Sol and the typical signage shown on Figure 50D. Landscaping - Reductions in the required landscape development zone up to 15 % and plant material substitutions. Monumentation - Reductions in corner cut-off area not to exceed 15%, changes in monumentation signage, materials and color as long as the proposed changes are compatible with existing monumentation in Paloma del Sol and the typical plans in the Specific Plan. Wall and Fencing - Changes in materials and color that are compatible with existing walls and fencing Paloma del Sol and typical wall and fencing details shown in the Specific Plan Increases in height not to exceed 10% of the maximum allowed by the Specific Plan. Architecture - Additional styles and detailing that are compatible with the eclectic Mediterranean styles prescribed for the Specific Plan. Setbacks - Reductions from required setbacks not to exceed 15%. Parking - Reductions in the required parking and parking area landscaping not to exceed 15%. Phasing - Phasing that differs from the Conceptual Phasing Plan and the Public Facilities Phasing Plan of the Specific Plan as long as infrastructure and community facilities needs of the community are met. Changes in major design criteria such as land use, minimum lot size, park dedication requirements and roadway standards will require an amendment to the Specific Plan. R:\$TAFFRPT~ISSPA97.CC1 1/6/91~ idb 2 The second issue raised at the Planning Commission meeting concerns off-site drainage. This issue was raised by a representative of the property owner of 165 acres directly to east of the specific plan area. The concern is that the ongoing development of the Paloma del Sol project in that area is having an impact on the off-site drainage of neighboring properties. Public Works staff informed the property owner and the Planning Commission that Assessment District 159 has designed and is in the process of installing appropriate facilities to mitigate all off-site drainage issues. In addition, it is required that all issues be resolved prior to the development of the lower portion of the project. Furthermore, the responsibility of these type of issues lies with Assessment District 159 and not the City. Soecific Plan Chanaes -- The proposed modifications associated with this amendment to the Specific Plan document involve minor changes. These changes include: 1. Overall project acreage and the number of dwelling will remain the same. 2. The park in Planning Area 29A is being increased in size from 4.0 to 5.0 acres. . The amount of acreage in Planning Area 28 has decreased by one acre and the number of dwelling units have decreased from 117 to 113. . The decrease in the number of dwelling units in Planning Area 28 is being transferred to Planning Area 2. The number of units in Planning Area 2 have increased from 116 to 120. . Roadway Cross Section (Figure 5B) has been modified to reflect roadway sections consistent with cross sections of approved tentative tract maps (TTM's). 1 Throughout the document, access points and entries have been relocated to conform to approved tentative tract maps (TTM's). . Throughout the document Streets "G" and "H" have been assigned the name "Capanula Way." 8. The Phasing Plan (Figure 16) has been revised with more current expectations. . Wording has been added within the Land Use Development Standards (Section 1.b., page 111-9) which gives the Community Development Director the authority to approve minor variations (deviations) from the standards established in the Specific Plan, without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment. This provision would be similar to the Minor Exception process found in the Development Code. 10. Figure 111-23 is being changed to require the construction of the Park in Planning Area 29A prior to the 174th building permit in Planning Area 23 or the first building permit in Planning Areas 26 or 28, whichever occurs first. R:\$TAFFRF~lSSPA97.CCI 1/6/98 klb 3 The changes have been reflected in the documents transmitted to the Planning Commission in the form of redlined (shaded) items for additions to the Plan and strikeout items for deletions. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: . City Council Ordinance No. 98- - Page 5 Conditions of Approval - Page 9 November 18, 1996 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 12 R:\STAFFRFI~ISSPA!~7.CC1 1/§/95 klb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. I ORDINANCE NO. 98- R:\STAl~FRF1A158PA97.CCI 1/6/98 klb 5 ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.,CULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AMENDMlZ~NT # 6 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219),THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-02~, 950-02~ THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950412{M}29, 955-030-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ~ The City Council in approving Planning Application No. PA97- 0158 (Amendment # 6 to Specific Plan No. 219), makes the following findings, to wit: 1. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment [Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219]) is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of the modification to an existing Specific Plan, with no changes to the overall density or the number of units. Ultimate development of the site will be consistent and compatible with the existing land use in the area. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to The planned land use of The area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219. 5. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase The impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235. The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The City of Temecula General plan EIR was certified on November 9, 1993. Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 219 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. In addition, an Addendum to that EIR was prepared in 1992 for Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. R:\STAFFRFB158PA97.CCI 116/98 klb 6 Based upon this information, it is Staff's opinion that due to the scope (a decrease in the overall density of the project) of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, there will be no effect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. The City Council hereby determines that the project is consistent with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. Section 3. ~ That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment//6 to Specific Plan No. 219) on property generally located north of SR79 South, east of Meadows Parkway (north) and Margarita Road (south), south of Pauba Road and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 950- 020-001 through 950-020-004, 950-020-009 through 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020-029, 955-030-002 through 955-030-004 and 955-030-006 through 955-030-011, and conditioned in Exhibit "B", attached hereto, and subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "B", in incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to The adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of The full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in The office of The City Clerk at least five days prior to The adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with The names of The Councilmembers voting for and against The Ordinance, and post The same in The office of The City Clerk. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED this 13th day of January, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: R:\STAFFRFBI58PA97.CC1 1/6/98 klb 7 June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of The City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that The foregoing Ordinance No. 98- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of The City Council on The 13th day of January, 1998, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of The City Council of The City of Temecula on the 13th day of January, by The following roll call vote: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRP~158PA97.CCI 1/6/98 klb 8 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\$TAFFRPT~158PA97.CC1 1/6/98 kib 9 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) Project Description: Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment [Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan]): Amendment of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan and Specific Plan Ordinance. Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Thirty (30) Days From the Second Reading of The Ordinance Approving the Amendment . The applicant shall submit the Amended Specific Plan text to the Planning Department. Failure to submit the amended text within 30 days shall void this approval. General Requirements . The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et se0., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. . The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for Specific Plan No. 219, and its previous amendments, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. . The amendment to the Specific Plan text shall conform with Attachment No. 7 (Specific Plan Text). R:\$TAFFRP~158PA97.CCI 1/§/98 ~ 10 o The amendment to the Specific Plan Ordinance shall conform with Attachment No. 8 (Specific Plan Ordinance). COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT . The City's park land dedication requirements shall be satisfied with the dedication of a 5.0 acre neighborhood park identified in Planning Area 29A. . The design of the 5.0 acre in Planning Area 29A shall provide for pedestrian circulation and handicapped accessibility pursuant to the American Disability Act (ADA) standards. . The installation of all landscape materials and irrigation equipment for the public park and the landscaped medians shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications and all applicable TCSD standards. . Construction of the 5.0 acre park and landscape medians proposed for dedication to the City shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. 10. The 5.0 acre park facility shall be dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the dedication of the property. 11. The developer shall complete the TCSD application and dedication process prior to the acceptance of street lighting and landscaped medians into the respective TCSD maintenance programs. 12. All private parks, paseo/open space areas and perimeter slope areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). OTHER AGENCIES 13. 14. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated July 10, 1997, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated July 9, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 15. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 24, 1997, a copy of which is attached. R:\STAFFRPTH58PA97.CC1 1/6/98 klb 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT: DECEMBER 15, 19967 R:\$TAFFRPT~158PA97.CCI 1/6/98 klb '[ 2 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan) Prepared By: John De Gange, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: , Make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified; . ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0158 Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: CaI-Paloma del Sol, LLC c/o Newland Associates, Inc. REPRESENTATIVES: T&B Planning Consultants, Inc. PROPOSAL: Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan): Amendment of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan and Specific Plan Ordinance. LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Generally located east of Meadows Parkway (north) and Margarita Road (south), south of Pauba Road, north of SR79 South, and west of Butterfield Stage Road Paloma del Sol Specific Plan (SP No. 219) EXISTING ZONING: Paloma del Sol Specific Plan (SP No. 219) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: SP (Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village) SP (Specific Plan No. 227 - Vail Ranch) Low Medium and Medium Density Residential Very Low Density Residential, Professional Office and Highway Tourist Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant/Under Construction R:\STAFFRPT~158PA97.PC 1/6/98jid I SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Single-family residences Vacant/Single-family residences Single-family residences and vacant Single-family residences; Arco AM/PM PROJECT STATISTICS Summary of Changes from Amendment No. 5 and Amendment No. 6 Medium Density Residential Medium-High Density Residential Very High Density Residential Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Day Care Middle School Elementary School Parks or Recreation Center Paseos Major Roads PROJECT TOTAL 581.0/ 580.0 416.5/416.5 36.3/36.3 32.3/32.3 17.5/ 17.5 2.0/2.0 20.0/20.0 41.0/ 41.0 31.5/ 32.5 1 10.0/1 10.0 103.4/103.4 1,391.51 1,391.5 :'::.: OL'D'.'N 0 :M'B ~ER· O.F :' OW EL[iNG""UNi :Y' :~'~:::I~EW:: :'::,?i:::!~:ii~:?::::?':'i~':U::'MB,E.R",,Q,F: ,,D,.,i.'~W E,L'.~i.~G. :'iUN!':~.'.$~.'.i..'. .' i' ':':: · 2,487/2,483 2,251 / 2,255 590/590 5,328/5,328 BACKGROUND Planning Application No. PA97-0158 Specific Plan) was submitted to the Planning Department on May 12, 1997. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on July 17, 1997. All applications were deemed complete on December 1, 1997. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Specific Plan Amendment) is the sixth amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The changes within this amendment have been necessitated by: a recently approved addendum to the project's Development Agreement (Addendum #1 to the R:\$TAFFRPT~lSSPAg?.PC 1/6/9g jid ~ Paloma del Sol Development Agreement) relative to the park in Planning Area 29A; the need for consistency with approved tentative tract maps in the specific plan area in terms of roadway cross sections and access points and neighborhood entry statements; the need to bring certain roadway cross sections into conformance with the City's General Plan; and a desire to provide the Community Development Director with the authority to approve minor deviations in the specific plan's standards. ANALYSIS Soecific Plan Chanoes The project is an amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan (Amendment # 6). The proposed modifications associated with this amendment to the Specific Plan document involve minor changes. These changes include: 1. Overall project acreage and the number of dwelling will remain the same. 2. The park in Planning Area 29A is being increased in size from 4.0 to 5.0 acres. . The amount of acreage in Planning Area 28 has decreased by one acre and the number of dwelling units have decreased from 117 to 113. The decrease in the number of dwelling units in Planning Area 28 is being transferred to Planning Area 2. The number of units in Planning Area 2 have increased from 116 to 120. . Roadway Cross Section (Figure 5B) has been modified to reflect roadway sections consistent with cross sections of approved tentative tract maps (TTM's). . Throughout the document, access points and entries have been relocated to conform to approved tentative tract maps (TTM's). . Throughout the document Streets "G" and "H" have been assigned the name "Capanula Way." 8. The Phasing Plan (Figure 16) has been revised with more current expectations. . Wording has been added within the Land Use Development Standards (Section 1.b., page 111-9) which gives the Community Development Director the authority to approve minor variations (deviations) from the standards established in the Specific Plan, without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment. This provision would be similar to the Minor Exception process found in the Development Code. 10. Figure 111-23 is being changed to require the construction of the Park in Planning Area 29A prior to the 174th building permit in Planning Area 23 or the first building permit in Planning Areas 26 or 28, whichever occurs first. The changes have been reflected in the documents transmitted to the Planning Commission in the form of redlined (shaded) items for additions to the Plan and strikeout items for deletions. R:\$TAFFRPT~158PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid ~ EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The Current General Plan and Zoning designation for the site is Specific Plan. No changes are being requested for either the General Plan or the Zoning Ordinance or map. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The City of Temecula General Plan EIR was certified on November 9, 1993. Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 219 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. In addition, an Addendum to that EIR was prepared in 1992 for Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Based upon this information, it is Staff's opinion that due to the scope of the proposed Amendment, there will be no change in the scale or magnitude of the development and consequently there will be no effect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Staff is recommending the Commission make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. SUMMARYICONCLUSIONS The project is an amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan and consists of minor changes in the document. The overall units and density within the Specific Plan will not change. Based upon previous environmental review for the project, Staff is not requiring any additional documentation for the project. FINDINGS Planning An_olication No. PA97-0158 (Amendment # 6 to the Paloma Del Sol Snecific Plao) , Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. . Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219) is consistent with the City's General Plan. . The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of the modification to an existing Specific Plan, with no changes to the overall density or the number of units. Ultimate development of the site will be consistent and compatible with the existing land use in the area. 1 The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219. R:\$TAFFRI~I58PA97.PC 1/§/98 jid 4 . The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235. The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Attachments: I . . . PC Resolution (Planning Application No. PA97-0158 - Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A. Specific Plan Ordinance (Included Under Separate Cover) - Blue Page 10 Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11 Initial Study - Blue Page 14 Exhibits- Blue Page 23 A. Vicinity Map Specific Plan Text (Included Under Separate Cover) - Blue Page 24 R:\STAFFRPT~I58PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:\STAFFRPT~158PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 (ZONING AMENDMENT # 6 OF THE PALOMA DEL SOL SPECIFIC PLAN SP NO. 219)," WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF SR79 SOUTH, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD AND WEST OF BUTI'ERFiELD STAGE ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 950-020-001 THROUGH 950-020-004, 950-020-009 THROUGH 950-020-025, 950-020- 027, 950-020-029, 955-030-002 THROUGH 955-030-004 AND 955-030-006 THROUGH 955-030-011 WHEREAS, Newland Associates filed Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) on December 15, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219); NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RF3OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219), makes the following findings, to wit: R:\STAFFRP~158PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 7 1. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment #6 to Specific Plan No. 219) is consistent with the City's General Plan. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists of the modification to an existing Specific Plan, with no changes to the overall density or the number of units. Ultimate development of the site will be consistent and compatible with the existing land use in the area. 4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219. 5. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235. The mitigation measures prepared for this Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City of Temecula General plan EIR was certified on November 9, 1993. Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 219 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. It has been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. In addition, an Addendum to that EIR was prepared in 1992 for Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. Based upon this information, it is Staffs opinion that due to the scope (a decrease in the overall density of the project) of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, there will be no effect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. The Commission hereby determines that the project is consistent with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. Section 4. ~ That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance substantially in the form contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. ~ That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) substantially in the from contained herein on property generally located north of SR79 South, east of Meadows Parkway (north) and Margarita Road (south), south of Pauba Road R:\$TAFFRP~158PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 8 and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 950-020-001 through 950-020-004, 950-020-009 through 950-020-025, 950-020-027, 950-020-029, 955-030-002 through 955-0304304 and 955-030-006 through 955-030-011, subject to the following conditions contained in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 6. PASSim, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of December, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R: \$TANNRI"IM $ 8PA97 .PC 1/6/98 jid 9 EXHIBIT A SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158) Included under separate cover R: \$TAFFRP'~ 158PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 10 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\~TAFFRPT~lSgPAg'7.PC 1/6/9g jld 11 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) Project Description: Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment [Amendment # 6 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan]): Amendment of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan and Specific Plan Ordinance. Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Thirty (30) Days From the Second Reading of The Ordinance Approving the Amendment I , The applicant shall submit the Amended Specific Plan text to the Planning Department. Failure to submit the amended text within 30 days shall void this approval. General Requirements . The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application No. PA97-0158 (Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan No. 219) which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et Se.~., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. . The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions of approval for Specific Plan No. 219, and its previous amendments, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. . The amendment to the Specific Plan text shall conform with Attachment No. 7 (Specific Plan Text). R: \$TAI~RPTH 58PA97.PC 1/0/98 jid 12 . The amendment to the Specific Plan Ordinance shall conform with Attachment No. 8 (Specific Plan Ordinance). COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT . The City's park land dedication requirements shall be satisfied with the dedication of a 5.0 acre neighborhood park identified in Planning Area 29A. . The design of the 5.0 acre in Planning Area 29A shall provide for pedestrian circulation and handicapped accessibility pursuant to the American Disability Act (ADA) standards. . The installation of all landscape materials and irrigation equipment for the public park and the landscaped medians shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications and all applicable TCSD standards. . Construction of the 5.0 acre park and landscape medians proposed for dedication to the City shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. 10. The 5.0 acre park facility shall be dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the dedication of the property. 11. The developer shall complete the TCSD application and dedication process prior to the acceptance of street lighting and landscaped medians into the respective TCSD maintenance programs. 12. All private parks, paseo/open space areas and perimeter slope areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). OTHER AGENCIES 13. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated July 10, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 14. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated July 9, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 15. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 24, 1997, a copy of which is attached. R:\$TAFFRP~I55PAg'7.PC 1/6/98 jid 1~3 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:\$TAFFRPT~155PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 14 CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist 7. Project Title: o . Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Temecula Zoning Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment #6 Paloma del Sol Specific Plan (SP 219) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number: John De Gange, (909) 694-6400 10. Project Location: 11. 12. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: 13. Zoning: 14. South of Pauba Road, east of Margarita Road, north of SR79 South and west of Butterfield Stage Road 15. Cal-Paloma del Sol, LLC c/o Newland Associates, Inc. 9404 Genesee Avenue, Suite 230 La Jolla, CA 92037 16. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan SP (Specific Plan) Description of Project: The project consists of a Specific Plan Amendment. The overall density and number of dwelling units within the Specific Plan will not change. This Initial Study will be conducted using the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and EIR Addendum as baselines for the analysis. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: South: East: West: Single-family residences Vacant/Single-family residences Single-family residences and vacant Single-family residences; Arco AM/PM Other public agencies whose approval is required: Riverside County Fire Department, Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, California Department of Transportation, Temccula Valley Unified School District, Riverside County Health Department, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District This Initial Environmental Study has been prepared to compare the impacts of the proposed General Plan Amendments and the Specific Plan Amendments to the original General Plan EIR and Specific Plan ElK Only those environmental impacts beyond those identified in the original environmental documentation will be discussed here. R:\STAFFRP~ l§SPA97.P~ 1/6/98 jid 15 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] [1 [1 [1 [ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] [ ] Population and Housing [ ] [ ] Geologic Problems [ ] Water Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Hazards Noise Public Services [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and have been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. No further analysis is required. R:\$TA12FRP~lSgPAg'7.1N2 1/6/98 jid 16 ISSUES A~D SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Si~ific~mt ~p~ Potentially sisnlncant Unless Mitigation Significant Imvaet NO 1. [,AND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to softs or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be p~oposai: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either direcfiy or indirecfiy (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the p~posal ~sult in or expose people to potential impacts involving? a. Fault rupture? b. Seismic ground shaking? c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e. Landslides or mudflows? f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or fill? g. Subsidenee of the land? h. Expansive soils? I. Unique geologic or physical features? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [1 [] [1 [1 [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] pc] [~ [~ [~ [~ R: \STAFFRFI~ 158PA97 .PC 1/6/98 jid 17 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Mitigation Significant No 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount o£ surface runoff? b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h. Impacts to groundwater quality? I. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b. Expose sensitive rejectors to pollutants? Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d. Create objectionable odors? 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCUIAiTION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b. Hazards to safety from d~sign features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)? ~. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ~:xsT^~wm-russP^97.~c ~/6/9s j~ 1 8 [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [1 [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [l [] [] [] [] [] ['1 [1 [1 [] [1 [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? [ ] e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [ ] f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ ] g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? [ ] 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? [ ] b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? [ ] c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, btc.)? [ ] d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? [ ] e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [ ] 08. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [ ] b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? [ ] ¢. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? [ ] 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? [ ] b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [ ] c.The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX] IX] R: \$TAFFRFI~ 158PA97.PC l16/98jid 19 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Potentially Unless Miti~tion No d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBHC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following area~: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e. Other governmental services7 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste disposal? g. Local or regional water supplies? 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a seerfie vista or seertie highway? b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] R'\STAFFRPTHSgPA97.PC 1/6/9g jid 20 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES rotmislly Significant Potentially Unle~ No Impact C. Create light or Dare? 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? b. Disturb archaeological resources? c. Affect historical resources? d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcfiy or indirectly? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] R:\$TAFFRP~t58PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 21 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. The City of Temecula General plan EIR was certified on November 9, 1993. Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was prepared for Specific Plan No. 219 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. It has been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. In addition, an Addendmn to that EIR was prepared in 1992 for Amendment No. 4 to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The project contains a number of minor changes and modifications to the Specific Plan that do not increase the scope, scale or magnitude of the previously approved development. Based upon this information, it is SlaWs opinion that due to the scope of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment, there will be no effect on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the ErR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the ErR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the ErR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required. Staff is recommending the Commission make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified. R:\$TAFFRPl~l$SPA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 22 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R.- \~TAFFRP~ 15g PA~/. PC 1/6/~$ jid ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 3 SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158) Included under separate cover R:\STAFFRP~I58PA97.PC 1/6/98 jid 24 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0158 EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 19967 VICINITY MAP ITEM 16 APPR(3 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FI CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/~'t~,~nager Gary Thornhili,~ommunity Development Director January 13, 1998 Planning Application No. PA97-0348 - Amendment to the City's Development Code Pertaining to Permitted Uses for Granny Flats and Guest Houses, Parking and Driveway Standards for Multi-Family Units, Second Units, Granny Flats, and Guest Houses in Residential Areas and adding a definition of Guest House Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council: . ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0348; and 2. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE BACKGROUND The Amendments were originally scheduled for the November 18, 1997 Commission hearing; however, this meeting was canceled due to lack of a quorum. At their December 1, 1997 hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA97-0348 by a 2-1 vote. Commissioner Miller abstained from the decision due to an potential conflict of interest. Commissioner Guerrieo was absent. Commissioner Slaven voted in opposition to the amendment, stating she disagreed with the conclusion that there should be a decrease in the amount of parking required for multi-family units. R:\$TAFFRPT~348PA97.CC1 12/18/97 n~ 1 DISCUSSION Proposed Clarifications to the Development Code Amendments to Table 17.06.030 - Schedule of Permitted Uses. Residential Districts Table 17.06.030 clarifies which zoning designations would allow the construction of granny flats and guest houses. A footnote will be added to the actual Table to clarify that these units would be allowed only in conjunction with a single-family residence in the Medium and High Density zones. Staff recommends the following amendments to the Development Code (additions to the language appear in bold type-face, deletions appear as a strike-out to the text). Table 17.06.030 Schedule of Permitted Uses Residential Districts Description of use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H Granny Flat P P P P P P P Guest House P P P P P P P Amendments to Table 17.24.040 - Parking S_naces Re0uired To clarify the number of covered and uncovered parking spaces plus guest parking spaces required per unit for multi-family projects, plus the parking requirements for second units and granny flats, Staff recommends the following amendments to the Development Code (additions to the language appear in bold type-face, deletions appear as a strike-out to the text). Table 17.24.040 Parking Spaces Required Description of Use Required Number of Spaces Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Multiple family residential --3-o1-fewe~ bedrooms (13 or more units) 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces I covered parking space plus % uncovered parking space for I bedroom (or less) units I covered parking space plus I uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and ½ uncovered parking space for 3 bedroom (or more )units plus I guest space/4 6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces R:\$TAFFRFl'k348PA97.CC1 12/18/97 ~ 2 Second Unit I covered perking spece for 2 bedroom units or less, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more Granny Flat 1 uncovered parking space. The proposed modifications take into account the different guest requirements for smaller and larger multi-family projects. The number of required guest parking for multi-family projects (13 or more units) is proposed to be reduced from I guest space/4 units to I space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest parking spaces required. Staff feels this better reflects the needs for these types of projects. Second units would require covered parking spaces based upon the number of bedrooms. The granny flat would require one (1) uncovered parking space. Staff feels these changes would better implement parking requirements in the Development Code. At the hearing, the Commission deleted language which would allow the Community Development Director the authority to waive the parking requirement for a granny flat which staff proposed in Table 17.24.040. Amendment to Section 17.24.050(B)- Driveway Width Fire Department Staff has determined that the Development Code doesn't differentiate where fire apparatus needs to access a site to provide fire protection services and where those services can be provided from the street. The following are the proposed amendments: Section 17.24.050(B) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B.1 with the following: When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14'). B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: UResidential Uses (two units or less). C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050.B.3 to read as follows: Residential Use (three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20'). D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Section 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Staff feels the proposed amendments will help clarify the requirements for driveway widths and allow appropriate design flexibility. Amendment to Section 17.34.010 - Definitions and Illustration-~ Since there is currently no definition in the Development Code for guest house, Staff recommends the following definition be added to Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code: U"Guest House" means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single- R:\STAFFR_PT~348PA97.CC1 12/18/97 mf 3 family residence, attached or detached, which may be utilized by guests of the primary residence for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not exceed eight hundred square feet in area· FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: · Ordinance No. 97- - Page 5 Planning Commission Staff Report (December 1, 1997) - Page 10 Planning Commission Minutes (December 1, 1997) - Page 11 R:~TAFFRPT~348PA~.CC1 12118197,~ 4 ATTACHMENT NO.. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 97- R:\$TAFFRPTk~SPA97.CC1 12/18/97 mf 5 ATTACItMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITI'ED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050Co) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUF~T HOUSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Eiadill~. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. follows: Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following uses to Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): Description of use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H Granny Flat p p p p p p 3 p 3 Guest House P P P P P P ~ P ~ B. Add the following language to the end of Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): "3. Allowed only with a single-family residence." R:\$TAFFRPT~348PA97.CC1 12115/97 nff 6 Section 2. follows: Table 17.24.040 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Revise the listing for multi-family residential from Table 17.24.040 - Parking Spaces Required to read as follows: Description of Use Required Number of Spaces Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Multiple family residential - 13 or more units) 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces 1 covered parking space plus 1/2 uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom (or less) units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and 1/~ uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units plus 1 guest space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces B. Add the following language to Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required): Second Unit 1 covered parking space for 2 bedroom units or ess, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more Granny Flat 1 uncovered parking space Section 3. as follows: Section 17.24.050(B) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B. 1 with the following: "When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14')." B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: "Residential Uses (two units or less)". C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050.B.3 to read as follows: "Residential Use (three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20')." R:\STAFFRl~348PA97.CCI 12/15197 mf 7 D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Section 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic." Section 4. follows: Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following Language to Section 17.34.010 (Definitions and Illustrations of Terms) of the Development Code: ""Guest Housen means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-family residence, attached or detached, which may be utilized by guests of the primary residence for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not ex~ed eight hundred square feet in area.~ Section 5. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration for PA97-0348, therefore, is hereby approved. Section 6. ~a:al~i~. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, parag~h, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STA~SPA97.CCI 116198 mf 8 Section 8. PASSE1), APPRO~, AND ADOPTED this day of Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the~ day of , 199._, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES' COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\$TAF~SPA97.CCI 12115197 mf 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 1, 1997 R:\STA~$PA97.CC1 12/15/97 ~ 10 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager DATE: December 1, 1997 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA97-0348 - Amendment to the City's Development Code Pertaining to Permitted Uses for Granny Flats and Guest Houses, Parking and Driveway Standards for Multi-Family Units, Second Units, Granny Flats, and Guest Houses in Residential Areas and adding a def'mition of Guest House Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: BACKGROUND , . ADO~ the Negative Declaration for PA97-0348; and - ADO~ Resolution No. 97- recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula, amending portions the City's Development Code pertaining to permitted uses for granny flats and guest houses, parking and driveway standards for multi-family units, second units, granny fiats and guest houses in residential areas and adding a definition of guest house," based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report This item was originally scheduled for the November 17, 1997 Planning Commission hearing. This hearing was canceled due to a lack of quorum. The Resolution to the attached Staff Report has been modified to reflect the cancellation of the Commission hearing. No other items in the Staff Report have been modified. Attachments: lo , Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 2 A. Ordinance No. 97- - Blue Page 5 Planning Commission Staff Report (November 17, 1997) - Blue Page 10 R:\STAPFRPTL~MSPA97.PC2 I1/18/97 nff 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:\STAFFRPT~348PA97.PC2 11118197 mf 2 ATrAC~ NO. 1 RF~OLUTION NO. 97- A RF~OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMI.qSION OF -- THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITL!~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITI'ED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUF~T HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RF~~ AREAS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE WI~EREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; ~EAS, on Januaxy 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; _ WItEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the Development Code; WHEREAS, notice of ~e proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; WHEREAS, the public hearing scheduled to be held on November 17, 1997, was canceled; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted again at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and WIIEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 1, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition. R:\$TA~SPA97.PC2 11118197 mf 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMIgSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMF_CULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERM~'i'i'~:i} USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMilY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RKSIDENTIAL AREAS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050Co) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHmIT A. PASSED, APPROVF~D AND ADOPTF~D this 1st day of December, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of December, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: - AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~STAFFRIrI%348PA97.PC2 11118197 mf 4 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 97- R:~'TA~$PA97,PC2 11/18/97 mf ~ EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMI~IDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABI.~ 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECNJI~ DEV'EIO~ CODE PERTAINING TO PERlV~'iT~.~ USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUF.~T HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Eiadiaga. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a neeci~ to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and C. That this Ordinance Complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. follows: Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following uses to Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): Description of use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H Granny Flat p p p p p p 3 p 3 Guest House p p p p p p 3 p ~ , B. Add the following language to the end of Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): '3. Allowed only with a single-family residence." R:\$TAFFRPT~$PA97.PC2 11118197 ~ 6 Section 2. follows: Table 17.24.040 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Revi~e the listing for multi-family residential from Table 17.24.040 - Parking Spaces Required to read as follows: Description of Use Required Number of Spaces Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Multiple family residential - 13 or more units) 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces 1 covered parking space plus % uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom (or less) units 1 covered parking space plus 1 tincovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and '/2 uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units plus 1 guest space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces a. .,.. Second Unit Granny Flat Add the following language to Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required): 1 covered parIcing space for 2 bedroom units or less, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more 1 uncovered parking space. The Community Development Director can waive this requirement if proof is provided that the resident is unable to drive a car and a commitment is made by the owner to provide the required parking space when the unit is occupied by a person who can drive. Section 3. as follows: Section 17.24.050(B) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B.1 with the following: 'When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14')." B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: 'Residential Uses (two units or less)". R:\STAFFRP'r5348PA97.1~-'2 11118197 mf 7 C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050.B.3 to read as follows: 'Residential Use (three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway' width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (2,~') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minifimm width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20').' D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Secfio~ 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic.~ Section 4. follows: Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following Language to Section 17.34.010 (Definitions and Illustrations of Terms) of the Development Code: "~Ouest House" means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-family residence, attached or detached, which may be utilized by guests of the primary residence for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not exceed eight hundred square feet in area. ~ Section 5. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared 'for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 6. ~~ilil~c The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, tnuagraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:~rA~PAge/,PC2 11/18/97 mf 8 Section $. PASSk~, APPROV~r~, AND ADOPTED this day of Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATrF..ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the~ day of , by the following roll call vote: , AYES' COUNCIL.MEMBERS NOES: COUNCR,MEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\ST~$PA97.PC2 11/18/97 mf 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 17, 1997 R:\STAFFRPTL~gPA97.PC2 I1/18197 mf 10 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commiss~/ Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager DATE: November 17, 1997 SUBJECT: i Planning Application No. PA97-0348 - Amendment to the City's Development Code Pertaining to Permitted Uses for Granny Flats and Guest Houses, Parking and Driveway Standards for Multi-Family Units, Second Units, Granny Flats, and Guest Houses in Residential Areas and adding a definition of Guest House ~_. Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ~ the Negative Declaration for P. A97-0348; and . ~ Resolution No. 97- . recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance entitled: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula, amending portions the City's Development Code pertaining to permitted uses for granny flats and guest houses, parking and driveway standards for multi-family units, second units, granny flats and guest houses in residential areas and adding a definition of guest house," based upon the Analysis contained in the Staff Report BACKGROUND In recent months, smf-f has become increasingly aware that there may be problems with our current parking standards for multi-family units in the Development Code. Staff conducted some analysis (discussed below) and has determined that the parking standards for multi-family units in the City's Development Code needs to be amended. In addition, staff has identified a potential problem with the parking standards for second units, granny flats and guest houses and the Fire Department has identified a potential problem with driveway widths. R:~STAPP~SPA97.PCI 11/719'7 nff I DISCUSSION The_need for the a. mendment was highlighted in a recently approved multi-family project. Planning Application No. PA96-0270, a Development Plan for 312 units, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 6, 1997. This project was originally approved with 702 parking spaces (624 covered and 78 uncovered). After the approval, the applicant filed a Minor Exception (Planning Application No. PA97-0133) for a reduction to the amount of their required parking spaces. At staffs request, the applicant researched this issue. They indicated, that based upon their experience with other projects they own, both the number of guest parking spaces required under the Development Code and the requirement for two covered parking spaces for one bedroom units were excessive. Based upon this analysis, a minor exception was approved to allow 624 parking spaces (434 covered or enclosed and 190 uncovered) for this project. Staff has also determined that there needs to be additional clarification on the number and type of required parking spaces for second units, granny flats and guest houses. There are no parking requirements for these types of uses in the Development Code, and staff has been receiving applications and inquiries for these types of uses. Research Conducted The following research was conducted in the preparation of this amendment to the Development Code: . Parking requirements for multi-family units, second units, granny flats and guest houses for other cities were reviewed. This research indicated there is a wide range of requirements amongst different jurisdictions. 2~ An analysis was provided by the applicant for Planning Application Numbers PA96-0270 and Planning Application No. PA97-0133 for multi-family units. This information indicated the amount of parking required for residents and guests was lower than that required in the Development Code for larger multi-family projects. Field investigations and telephone surveys were conducted of several existing multi-family projects within the City of Temecula. This research indicated that the amount of parking provided for existing multi-family projects exceeded the amount needed. The field investigations wer~ conducted on two mornings and nights of the week (Monday and Saturday) when it was anticipated that most of the residents were at home and visitors were present on-site. There always appeared to be a noticeable number of vacant parking spaces. It should be noted that the parking staxldaxds from Ordinance No. 348 required less parIcing spaces than the Development Code. Ordinance No. 348 required: 1.25 parking spaces for a single bedroom or studio unit, 2.25 parking spaces for two bedroom units, and 2.75 parking spaces for three or more bedroom units. One covered, semi- enclosed or carport parking space was required per unit. R:XSTAFFRPTLMSPA97.PCI 11/7/97 mir 2 Proposed Clarifications to the Development Code ,a, mendments to Table 17.06.030 - Schedule of Permitted Uses. Residential Districts To clarify which zoning designations would allow the construction of granny fiats and guest houses. A footnote will be added to the actual Table to clarify that these units would be allowed only in conjunction with a single family residence in the Medium and High Density zones. Staff recommends the following amendments to the Development Code (additions to the language appear in bold type-face, deletions appear as a strike-out to the text). Table 17.06.030 Schedule of Permitted Uses Residential Districts Description of use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M -- H Granny Flat P P P P P P P Guest House P P P P P P P Amendments to Table 17.24.040 - Parking Spaces Required To clarify the number of covered and uncovered parking spaces plus guest parking spaces required per unit for multi-family projects, plus the parking requirements for second units and granny fiats, Staff recommends the following amendments to the Development Code (additions to the language appear in bold type-face, deletions appear as a strike-out to the text). .. Table 17.24.040 Parking Spaces Required Description of Use Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Required Number of Spaces ! 2-$ units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces RP, STAFFRPTX348PA97.PCI 11/12/97 mf 3 Multiple family residential - ~x-ft~a~r b~-rtn:nns (13 or more units) Second Unit Granny Flat 1 covered parking space plus % uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom (or less) units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and % uncovered parking space for 3 bedroom (or more )units plus 1 guest space/~ 6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces 1 covered parking space for 2 bedroom units or less, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more 1 uncovered parking space. The- w~-o~;ded wi,en ~he granny ~capled ~y anoiher"pe~on who~ d~. The proposed modifications take into account the different guest requirements for smaller and larger multi-family projects. The number of required guest parking for multi-family projects (13 or more units) is proposed to be reduced from 1 guest space/4 units to 1 space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest parking spaces required. Staff feels this better reflects the needs for these types of projects. The second unit would require covered parking spaces, the number required based upon the number of bedrooms. The granny fiat would require one (1) uncovered parking space and this requirement could be'waived if proof is provided that the resident is unable to drive a car. If the parking requirement is waived, the property owner will be required to submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that a parking space will be provide when another tenant moves into the unit. Staff feels these changes would better implement parking requirements in the Development Code. R:\STAFFRFIR348PA97.PC1 ! I/7/97 lift 4 .Amendment to gection 17.24.050_(tt)- Driveway Width Fire Department Staff has determined that the Development Code doesn't differentiate where fire dpparatus needs to access a site to provide fire protection services and where those services can be provided from the street. The following are the proposed amendments: Section 17.24.050(B) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B.1 with the following: When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14'). B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: "Residential Uses (two units or less). C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050. B.3 to read as follows: Residential Use (three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20'). D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Section 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Staff feels the proposed amendments will help clarify the requirements for driveway widths and allow appropriate design flexibility. Amendment to Section 17,34.010 -,Definitions and Illustrations Since there is currently no definition in the Development Code for guest house, Staff recommends the following definition be added to Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code: ""Guest House" means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single- family residence, attached or detached, which may be utilized by guests of the primary residence for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not exceed eight hundred square feet in area. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. No mitigation measures are required. R:~STAFFRPT~348PAO'/.P(21 11/7/97 mf 5 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Goal 5 of the City' s _General Plan requires "An adequate supply of private and public parking to ~eet the needs of residents and visitors to the City." The proposed amendment to the Development Code will better implement this Goal of the General Plan by requiting larger multi- family projects, second units and granny fiats to provide the necessary amount of parking spaces for their respective uses. SUbIlVlARY Staff is proposing several amendments to the City's Development Code which will better implement parking requirements in the Development Code. These modifications include adding granny flats and guest houses to the list of permitted uses in Table 17.06.030, revising parking standards for multi-family units, second units, granny flats, and guest houses in residential areas contained in Table 17.24.040, driveway widths contained in Section 17.24.050(b) and adding a definition of guest house to Section 17.34.010. Attachments: 1 Resolution No. 97-__._ - Blue Page 7 A. Ordinance No. 97- - Blue l~age I0 Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 15 R:\STAFFRPT~34gPA97.PCI 11/7/97 mf 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOL~ION NO. 97- R:\STAFFRFI~348PA97.PCI 11/7197 mf 7 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMF2tDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RF. SIDENTIAL AREAS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS- CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050Co) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE WHEREAS, on November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan; WBEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City of Temecula City Council adopted the City's Development Code; WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the Development Code; WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and, WHFJIEAS, a public hearing was held on November 17, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMIgSION FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLEB: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050Co) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUF_~T HOUSE" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A. R:~STAFFRPT~34gPA97.PCI 11/7/97 mf ~ PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of November, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\STAFFRPTX348PA97.PC1 11/7197 mf 9 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 97- R:~,gTAI~I~IIPAg~'/.PCI 1 l/"//g7 mf 10 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMI~NDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABI~F~ 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMFNT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITFED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUF~T HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINFJ~ IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUF~T HOUSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. EiadJaga. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. That Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by citieg to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; B. That there is a need to amend the Development Code to protect the public health, .. safety and welfare; and C. That this Ordinance complies with all applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Section 2. follows: Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following uses to Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts): Description of use HR VL L-1 L-2 LM M H Granny Flat p p p p p p 3 p 3 Guest House P P P p p p 3 p 3 B. Add the following language to the end of Table 17.06.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses, Residential Districts)' "3. Allowed only with a single-family residence." R:\STAFFRIrFLMSPA97.PCI 11/12/97 tnf 1 1 Section 2. follows: Table 17.24.040 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as Spaces Required to read as follows: Description of Use Revise the listing for multi-family residential from Table 17.24.040 - Parking Multiple family residential- 3 or fewer bedrooms (12 or less units) Multiple family residential - 13 or more units) Required Number of Spaces 2-5 units: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 2 guest spaces 6-12 units: 2 covered spaces/unit plus 3 guest spaces 1 covered parking space plus % uncovered parking space for 1 bedroom (or less) units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units 2 covered parking spaces and 1/2 uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units plus 1 guest space/6 units, with a minimum of 4 guest spaces B. Add the following language to Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required): Second Unit Granny Flat 1 covered parking space for 2 bedroom units or less, 2 covered parking spaces for 3 bedroom units or more 1 uncovered parking space. The Community Development Director can waive this requirement if proof is provided that the resident is unable to drive a car and a commitment is made by the owner to provide the required parking space when the unit is occupied by a person who can drive. Section 3. as follows: Section 17.24.0500~) of the Development Code is hereby amended to read A. Replace the first sentence in Section 17.24.050.B. 1 with the following: 'When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum driveway width for a one-way driveway shall be fourteen feet (14')." B. Rename Section 17.24.050.B.2 to read: "Residential Uses (two units or less)". R:\STAFF~$PA~/.PCI 11/I2/ff'/mf 12 C. Add a new Section to be known as 17.24.050.B.3 to read as follows: "Residential Use-(three to five units). When fire apparatus access is required, the minimum driveway width ~hall be twenty feet (20') for one-way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic. Otherwise the minimum width for a driveway shall be twenty feet (20').-" D. Amend the minimum driveway width in existing Section 17.24.050.B.3 (to be renumbered 17.24.050.B.4) to indicate that driveway widths shall be twenty feet (20') for one- way traffic and twenty-four feet (24') for two-way traffic." Section 4. follows: Section 17.34.010 of the Development Code is hereby amended to read as A. Add the following Language to Section 17.34.010 (Definitions and Illustrations of Terms) of the Development Code: ~"Guest House" means an additional unit to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-family residence, attached or detached, which may be utilized by guests of the primary residence for sleeping purposes only, and does not contain cooking facilities which require outside venting per the Uniform Building Code, and does not exceed eight hundred square feet in arm." Section 5. Environmental. An Initial Study prepared for this l:/roject indicates that although the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, ;is hereby granted. Section 6. Sty..e, rahi~. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for,any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least fi,~e days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within-15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\$TAFFRPT~348PA97.PCI 11/12/97 mf 13 199 . Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199__, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting-of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the -.__ day of , by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS lune S. Greek, City Clerk R:\$TAF~SPAgr/.PCI 11/7/9~ nil: 14 ATTACHlV[ENT NO. 2 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:',STAFF~$PA~)7.P'CI 11/7/97 nxf 1~ . . . . lO. Project Tide: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Plan Designation: Zoning: Description of Project: Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Other public agencies whose approval is required: CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist Planning Application No. PA97-0348 City of Temeeula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400 City-wide m the residential districts Same as No. 2 Multiple residential designations Multiple residential designations Amendment to Chapter 17.24 (Table 17.24.040) of the City's Development Code, pertaining to parking requirements and driveway width requirements for multi- family residences, second units, granny fiats and guest houses and an amendment to Chapter 17.34 of the Development Code, adding a definition of guest house N/A None R:~,$TAFFRF!'X~48PA97.PCI 11/7/97 nat 16 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, revolving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following page. [- ]' Land Use and Planning [ I Hazards -- [ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise [ ] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services [ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance [X] None DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. - Printed Name Date R:\$TAFFRPTLMSPA97.1n21 11/7/97 mf 17 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Pot~a~aily ImFa~ Po~n~ially No Impact L LAND USE AfO) PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zonms~ b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact~ to soils or farmlands, or impacL~ from incompatible land uses)? ¢. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Woui.d the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving? a. Fault rupture? : b. Seismic ground shaking? c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e. Landslides or mud flows? f. Erosion, changes m topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grad'rag or fill? g. Subsidence of the land? h. Expansive soils? i. Unique geologic or physical features? 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a.Changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount of surface runo~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [! [] [] [] [] [) [] [] [] () [] [] []- [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [1 (] (] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] () () () [] (] [] (] [] [) (] [~ (~ (x] (x] [x] [x] (x'] [x] (x] R:~STAFFRPT~48PA97.PC! 11/'7/97 mf l ~ ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Signifi~nt Impact - 'b. Exposure ofpeOple or property to water related hazards such as flooding? [ ] e. Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? [] d. Changes m the amount of surface water m any water boch/? [ ] e. Changes m currents, or the course or direction of water movements? [ ] f. Change m the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? [ ] g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? [ ] h. Impacts to groundwater quality? [ ] i. Substantial reduction m the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? [ ] 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? [ ] b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? [ ] c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change m climate? [ ] d. Create objectionable odors? [ ] 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Incrcasc vehicle trips-or traffic congestion? [ ] b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous totersection or incompatible uses)? [ ] e. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? [ ] d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? [ ] e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [ ] Si~,mfica~ Impac~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [] [l [] [] [] [] [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] IX] IX] IX] IX] [~ [x] ['4] [x] [X'l R:\STAFF~SPA97.PCI 11/7/97 mf 19 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING..I. NFORMATION SOURCES _ 'f. Conflicts with a-dopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g. Rail, waterbomc or air traffic impacts? [] £] 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: 8. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? [] [] [] d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripman and vernal pool)? e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [] Use non-renewal resources in a Wasteful and inefficient manner? Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? [] [l 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? [] b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [] c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [] d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? [] e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brash, grass, or trees? [] Siznd'~ant Unle~ [] [] [] [] [] [] []- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Si~ni/'~:am [] [1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] No Ix] [X'l [x] IX] IX] IX] Ix] IX] IX] Ix] R:\STAPFRPT~348PA99.PCI 11/7/97 mf 20 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Poun~i~lly lmpac~ No Impact NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase m existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result In n need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e. Other governmental services? 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? , Local or regional water treatment Or distribution facilities? d. Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste disposal? g. Local or regional water supplies? 1;}. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic h/ghway? b. Have a demonsU'able negative aesthetic effect? c. Create light or glare? 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? [3 [1 [] [1 [1 [] [] [] [1 [] [1 [1 [] [1 (1 (] (1 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [l [I [] [1 [1 [] [1 [1 [] [1 (1 [1 [] [] [] [1 [] [1 [] [] [] [1 (1 [] [] [) (1 [1 (x'l [~ Ix] [~ (x] [l [x] [xl R:\STAFFRPT~348PA97.PCI 11/7/99 mf 21 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES _ -b. Disturb archaealogical resources? c. Affect historical resources? d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? IS. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduoe the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short,term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other cun'ent projects, and the effects of probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. None. Potentially Impact Unleas ~ 'i'nan Mitismfion Significant Ineorponed Impact, No [] [] [] Ix] [] I] [] Ix] [] [] [] Ix] [] [1 [l IX'3 [] [] [1 IX] [1 [l [] IX] [] [] [] IX] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX] [] [] [] IX] R:~STAFFRFI'L345PA97.PCI 11/7/97 mf 22 DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Environmental Study, an Amendment to Chapter i7.24 (Table 17.24.040) of the City's Development Code, pertaining to parking requirements for multi-family residences, second units, granny flats and guest houses and an amendment to Chapter 17.34 of the Development Code, and driveway widths contained in Section 17.24.050(tt) and adding a definition of guest house of the City's Development Code will not have an impact to the environment in the following areas: Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geologic Problems, Water, Air Quality, Transportation/Circulation, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources and Recreation. Based upon analysis of existing parking conditions, as well as research of other municipalities, staff has determined that the amendments to the Development Code will not result in any impacts to the environment and no mitigation measures will be required. R:~$TAFFRFr~48PA97.PC1 11/7/97 mf 23 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 1, 1997 R:\STAFFRPTL348PA97.CC1 12115197 m~ 1 1 DRAFT COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved for the approval of the December 1, 1997, agenda with the continuation of Agenda Item No. 4. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioner Guerriero absent). 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 20. 1997 MOTION: Commissioner Slaven moved for the approval of the October 20, 1997, minutes as written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioner Guerriero absent). 3. DIRECTOR'S HEARING UPDATE None given. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0349 Planning Commission consideration to repeal Section 17.24(D)(1)(f) of the City's Development Code pertaining to Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage in residential areas. This Agenda Item has been continued (see motion above). 5. PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA97-0348 Planning Commission consideration to amendment the City's Development Code pertaining to permitted uses for granny flats and guest houses, parking standards for multi-family units, second units, granny flats, and guest houses in residential areas and adding a definition of guest house. RECOMMENDATION To recommend approval based on the analysis contained in the staff report. Associate Planner Fagan provided the staff report (as per written material of record), highlighting the recommended amendments, which included "Schedule of Permitted Uses" and "Parking Spaces Required." In response to the Commissioners, Mr. Fagan advised that a covered parking space would be considered a carport, not an enclosed garage; that an uncovered parking space would be considered a driveway; that a phone survey, conducted by staff, reflected that multi-family housing does not have a vacancy problem throughout the Planning Commission December 1, 1997 DRAFT City; that existing multi-family housing projects indicated no problem with regard to insufficient parking spaces; that granny flats and guest houses will only be permitted for single-family residences; that in order to construct a granny flat and/or guest house, specific design criteria must be met; that it would be staff's intent to require one separate, uncovered parking space, not including the driveway, for the granny flat; and that there are specific Code requirements with regard to parking spaces and the construction of them. Commissioner Miller suggested that staff's intent to require one separate, uncovered parking space for the granny flat should be clearly reflected in the Ordinance. Mr. Miller expressed concern with the enforceability of the Community Development Director's ability to waive the requirement of one uncovered parking space for the granny flat in the event the current resident of the flat were not a licensed driver. Attorney Curley clarified that the verbiage for "Schedule of Permitted Uses" is existing in the Code, noting that staff is proposing the addition of the Table (as per staff report). With regard to the application for a granny flat/guest house, Mr. Curley advised that the applicant must be able to meet all building requirements, noting that such developments would primarily be restricted to single-family units. Mr. Curley advised that State law clearly distinguishes between a guest house and a granny flat, noting that more restrictions are imposed on the granny flat. With regard to how these Code amendments impacted a previously approved, multi-family project, Commissioner Slaven expressed concern with the reduction of covered parking spaces by 190 and with an overall parking space reduction of 78 spaces. Although not applicable to this request, Commissioner Slaven questioned how these parking space reductions impacted the design of this previously approved, multi-family project. In response to Commissioner Slaven, Project Planner Donahoe advised that the Spanos Apartment Project added additional handicapped parking spaces in order to meet the ADA requirements but noted that the design of the previously approved project did not change in terms of buildings, parcels, and square footage. She further clarified that the reduction in parking spaces (190) was disbursed throughout the site and not all in one area; and that some ADA parking spaces are covered as required and some are uncovered. In light of the attorney's input and because of the potential conflict with a ¢lient's property, Commissioner Miller noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue. At this time, Chairwoman Fahey opened the public hearing. No comments were received. Commissioner Slaven noted that, in her opinion, the reduction of internal parking spaces for multi-family projects would not be in the best interest of the City. With regard to the granny flats, she, echoed by Chairwoman Fahey, expressed concern as to the enforceability of the Community Development Director's ability to waive the requirement for one uncovered parking space in the event the resident did not possess a driver's license. Therefore, Commissioner Slaven stated that an applicant should be required to provide the necessary parking requirements independent of the resident's driving status. Planning Commission December 1, 1997 DRAFT Because a granny flat would be a permanent structure and because such a structure could be converted to a student flat, Commissioner Slaven reiterated her desire to require the applicant of such a request to provide the required amount of parking independent of driving status. Following Commission discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to remove, because of lack of enforceability, the Community Development Director's ability to waive the requirement of one uncovered parking space for a granny flat, dependent on the resident's driving status. Planning Manager Ubnoske suggested that additional clarification be provided, by way of verbiage in the Code, relative to granny flat parking requirements, ensuring that the required parking spaces are in addition to the parking spaces required for the single-family residence. MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to close the public hearing and to adopt the Negative Declaration for PA 97-0348 and to adopt Resolution No. 97- . The motion was seconded by Chairwoman Fahey and voice vote of those present reflected approval as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 97 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF TABLE 17.06.030, TABLE 17.24.040 AND SECTION 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES FOR GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY UNITS, SECOND UNITS, GRANNY FLATS AND GUEST HOUSES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS, DRIVEWAY WIDTHS CONTAINED IN SECTION 17.24.050(b) AND ADDING A DEFINITION OF GUEST HOUSE AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Fahey and Soltysiak. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Slaven. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Miller. Clarifying her no vote, Commissioner Slaven reiterated that because these amendments decrease the required number of parking spaces, she voted in opposition. Planning Commission December 1, 1997 ITEM 17 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF I=INAI~E CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council/~jManager Gary Thornh~i?~ommunity Development Director DATE: January 13, 1998 SUBJECT: , ,, Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) - Appeal Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission Recommends that the City Council: I . MAKE a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and an Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and findings that a subsequent or supplemental EIR are not required; and 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97- 0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), TO PERMIT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TOTAL OF 203,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ARCADES, THEATERS AND SHOPS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING) ON 16.5 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (100 FEET WEST OF PUJOL STREET), 700 FEET SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE/VINCENT MORAGA DRIVE AND EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, WITHIN THE WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-013, 940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940- 310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320- 003 BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. R:~TAFFRFl'k392PA97.CC1 12/2319~7 mr 1 BACKGROUND The project was approved by the Planning Commission at their December 15, 1997 hearing by a 3-0 vote. Commissioner Fahey was absent and Commissioner Soltysiak abstained due to potential conflict of interest. Four people spoke in favor of the project, and two spoke in opposition. Albert S. Pratt (hereafter "appellant") was one of the individuals speaking in opposition to the project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the design, construction and operation of approximately 203,300 square feet of entertainment, retail and restaurant space, with associated landscaping, hardscape and parking. The building uses and square footages are detailed in the table below: Phase II Building Area Tabulation ' Building":(l::'ett'et' C'orresp:on'ds"te'Plaz. :Pl"mO.' .:'. BUilding':Sq'"U'a~e"FOOta '~"':.::.::::.:::':.:'.":::. ::: '.::: ============?================== ..::..:: ... , . ... .' : :. ..'. ..:..........:..... · ., .... :.:.: ....... , : : ·. : ..: ..:: . : .: .: · . ." ..:::, ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:........: :.".'.:'.." . ,, Welcome Center (A) 1,000 square feet Retail Shops & Major Retail (B) 25,000 square feet Retail Shops, Music Plaza, Food & Retail (C) 10,000 square feet Virtual Reality Ride, Penny Arcade & 17,000 square feet Restaurant (D) Visitor Information (E) 1,500 square feet Roy Rogers Experience, Retail Shops, Diner, Honky-Tonk Music Theater & Celebrity 100,600 square feet Theater (F) Retail Shops (G) 8,000 square feet Chapel (H) 1,800 square feet Retail Shops (I) 5,000 square feet Studio Theater, Restaurant, Food 33,400 square feet Exposition & Native American Store (J) Total (A-J) 203,300 square feet i i i i i iii i i i i iii ANALYSIS The appellant submitted his appeal on December 22, 1997. The appellant has provided several statements in his rationale for the appeal (reference Attachment No. 2) which will be responded to below. The issues raised have been previously addressed in the City Council Staff Report for the Appeal of Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan - Zev Buffman, Applicant). Appropriate sections of the previous City Council Staff Report have been incorporated into this Staff Report. It should be noted that the Addendum to the R:\STAFFRPT~92PAg?.CCl 12/23197 mf 2 previously certified EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project was approved by the City Council on November 18, 1997. ~.o.~ellants ReQuest for the City Council to Deny the Project The appellant states: Ul am appealing the decision of the approval of the Planning Commission of PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) and requesting that this decision be denied by the City Council." In response, the recommendation before the Council is to deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. A_o_oellants Belief that a SubseQuent or Suo_olemental Environmental Imeact Reoort ("EIR") is The appellant states: "This application for a Conditional Use Permit continues the attempts of the City Staff, Planning Department, Planning Commission and City Council forcing the acceptance of the Applicant TEV, Inc's. (Zev Buffman) Revised/Expanded Project without the preparation and circulation of a Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") in violation of CEQA Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq." In response, staff has determined, through the analysis performed for the Initial Environmental Study (IES) contained within the Addendum to the previously certified EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project, that the current project is well within the scope of the project identified in the previously certified EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. The project originally envisioned 1,045,500 square feet of development, with 695,000 square feet to occur in the Westside Specific Plan area. The current proposal is for 459,700 square feet in the Westside Specific Plan area. The statement that this project is an expansion is incorrect. The decision to approve an Addendum and not require a Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (UEIR") was addressed in the appellant's appeal of Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan). The following excerpt, from the November 18, 1997 City Council Staff Report for Planning Application No. PA97-0298, addresses this allegation by the appellant. "An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was conducted to determine if the project was within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95- 0031). In addition, an EIR Consistency Report was prepared. Based upon staff's analysis in the IES and the review and examination of the EIR Consistency Report, staff determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR should be prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. An addendum was prepared because changes and additions were necessary for the project, but none of the conditions listed below (Section 15162 of the Guidelines) calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. According to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs: R:\~rAFFRPT~92PA97.CCI 12/23/~7 mf 3 substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these occurred so staff determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR was appropriate." "piecemealina_ the Proiect" The appellant states: "1 cannot believe that you think the taxpaying citizens of Temecula are so naive as to not know that you are deliberately piecemealing this total project in violation of CEQA, by not preparing a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR." In response, the appellant's allegation that the project was being piecemealed was addressed in the appellants appeal of Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan). The following excerpt, from the November 18, 1997 City Council Staff Report for Planning Application No. PA97-0298, addresses this allegation by the appellant. ~The requirement of CEQA is that the entire development proposal be analyzed as a single project. CEQA requires that all related planning applications be considered as a single project for its environmental review. This is precisely what the City did with the originally certified EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. The current project is within the scope of the previously identified project that was analyzed in its entirety in the Old Town Redevelopment Project. The project was reviewed to determine if it was consistent with the underlying specific plan (Westside Specific Plan) and previously certified EIR. The Specific Plan looked at all components of the project. This project was envisioned by the Specific Plan, is within the scope of the Specific Plan and further implements the Specific Plan. If the City had done what was being suggested by the appellant, the City would have "piecemealed" the project's environmental review." Statements Made Bv Aooellant Which Have no Bearino on the ADDeal The appellant makes two statements additional in the appeal. Both of these statements were not raised at the Planning Commission hearing. In addition, staff feels these are opinions of the appellant which are not substantiated by any factual information. It should be noted, that as of the date of this project, no application for a Convention Center has been received for processing by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. ~The magnitude of this immense project never ceases to grow, and now it is proposed that a 16.0 acre site for a Convention Center is requested by two of our Councilmen in addition to the Revised/Expanded Project of the Applicant, TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman);" and "1 cannot believe that you think the taxpayers of Temecula are so naive as to not know that you are deliberately inflating the cost of improvements to allow money for the applicant or the City to construct major portions of the Revised/Expanded Project." R:\STAFFRFl~92PAF7.CC1 12/23197 ~f 4 FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: . . Resolution No. 98-~- Page 6 A. Conditions of Approval - Page 13 Rationale for Appeal - Page 30 Planning Commission Staff Report (December 15, 1997) - Page 31 Planning Commission Minutes (December 15, 1997) - Page 32 R:\$TAFFRFI~92PA97.CC1 12/23197 mf 5 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 98- R:\$TAFFRPT~!~2PA~7.CCI 12/2.3/97 mf 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMM[qSION'S DECISION APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA974}392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), TO PFALMIT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TOTAL OF 203,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ARCADES, THEATERS AND SHOPS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING) ON 16.5 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF OLD TOWN TEMF. CUI~ (100 FEET WEST OF PUJOL STREET), 700 FEET SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE/VINCENT MORAGA DRIVE AND EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, WITHIN THE WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-013, 940- 310-044, 940-310-045, 940-310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320-003 BASED UI~N THE ANALYSIS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. WHEREAS, TEV, Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permi0 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WItEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permi0 on December 15, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit); WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit); R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CCI 12f23/97 mf 7 WltEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit- Appeal) was filed by Albert S. Pratt on December 22, 1997, requesting the City Council deny the approval of the Planning Commission and require a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report be prepared for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings; to wit: That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following 1. The Project has been the subject of extensive prior environmental review and that no additional environmental review is needed for the following reasons: A. On July 13, 1995, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 9549 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0031 (FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER," certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Westside Specific Plan and Planning Application No. PA95- 0003 (Westside Specific Plan) and changing the zone from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural - Twenty Acre Minimum Parcel Size) to S-P (Specific Plan) for the Property. B. An amendment to the project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 18, 1996 and by the City Council on March 26, 1996, at which time a finding was made that no further environmental review was required for the project; C. The Staff of the Planning ~ent has prepared an Initial Environmental Study (IF_~), dated September 17, 1997, analyzing the proposed Development Plan and the prior environmental actions on the Project, which IES is incorporated herein by this reference. D. An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was conducted to determine if the project was within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95-0031). Based upon this analysis, staff determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR be prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Addendum was prepared because changes and additions were necessary for the project, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the Guidelines calling for the preparation of a R:\STAFFRFrk392PA97.CCI 12123197 mf 8 subsequent EIR have occurred. Mitigation measures approved with the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95-0031) will apply to this project. E. The proposed Project incorporates the provisions of the City's General Plan, the Westside Specific Plan, the current zoning regulations for the Property, the Mitigation Plan of Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (Final Environmental Impact Report) and such other ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, density, design, improvement, development fees, and construction standards applicable to the Property. All of the components of the proposed Project which might affect the environment were discussed and analyzed in Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). Minor changes to the project have been reviewed and examined in an Addendum to Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). F. Based on the evidence in the record before it, and after caretiff consideration of the evidence and the Addendum, the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and the City Council on November 18, 1997 made findings and determined that neither a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR was required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163. G. The elements of the Project, as described in the Conditional Use Permit were contemplated and fully and properly analyzed in the EIR certified and approved by the City Council on July 13, 1995 and the Addendum adopted on November 18, 1997. H. There have been no subsequent changes to the Project which would require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. I. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. J. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR which would show or tend to show that the Project might have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous FEIR. K. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FELR which would show or tend to show that significant effects previously examined might be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR. L. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternative previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. R:\STAFFR_PT~92PA97.CCI 12/23197 mf 9 M. There is no new information since the certification of the FE1R which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Section 2. findings; to wit: That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project meets the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan, is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as designed and conditioned will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. 5. The decision to conditionally approve the application is based upon substantial evidence in view of the reco~ as a whole before the Planning Commission. The Commission has received a copy of the Staff Report which includes the necessary analysis, findings and Conditions of Approval. In addition, the Commission has previously reviewed and recommended approval of an EIR and Addendum to the E1R, both of which were certified/adopted by the City Council and which addressed the impacts of this project on the environment and the necessary mitigation measures. R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CCI 12/23197 mf I 0 Section 3. ~ That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) and denying Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Us~ Permit- Appeal), upholding the Planning Commission's decision approving Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit), to permit the design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres located west of Old Town Temecula (100 feet west of Pujol Street), 700 fe~t south of Ridge Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive and east of the City's western border, within the Westside Specific Plan and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 940-310-013,940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940- 310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320-003 based upon the analysis contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. R:\STAFFRPTk392PA97.CCI 12123197 nf I 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOIVlW~D by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 13th day of Janua/y, 1998. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of January, 1998 by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILMEMBERS' NOF, S: COUNCILMEMBERS' ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 1une S. Greek, CMC City Clerk R:\$TAFFRP'I~92PA97.CCI 12/23/~ mf '[ ~ EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~TAI~.PT~392PA97.CC1 12t23/97 mf '~ 3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) Project Description: The design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (herdscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres Assessor's Parcel No.: 940-310-013, 940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940-310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320-003 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project . The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition. General Requirements . The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0392 is for the design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres. . The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. R:\$TAFPRPT~92PA97.CCI 12/23/97 n~ 1 4 . This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null'and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan) and Exhibit E (Plaza Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Bicycle racks shall be provided in conformance with the Westside Specific Plan. a. Architectural features which include advertising shall only be allowed to advertise items which historically tie into the architecture upon which these architectural features are located. . Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E (Plaza Plan) and Exhibit F (Landscape Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. . Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit G, or as amended by these conditions. . All buildings shall comply with the intent of the materials identified on Exhibit H (Typical Elevations). . Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit I (color and material book), or as amended by these conditions. 10. All conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan) shall apply to this project, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, for all slope areas created as a result of the grading operation, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for review and approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance). R:\$TAFFRPT~92PA97.CCI 12/23/97 mf 15 d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan). 12. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to guarantee the installation of plantings and irrigation for all slope areas in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 13. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall apply for a Minor Exception, for approval by the Planning Manager, for a reduction in the amount of parking required per the Westside Specific Plan. 15. All slope landscaping and irrigation shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. In addition, all major and minor entry features and monumentation and the corner landscape and monumentation features shall be included on the plans. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan). 17. No building permit shall be issued for any building traversing a parcel line. 18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 19. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 20. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 16 21. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 22. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 23. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 24. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at the owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (909) 696-3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 25. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the maintenance of plantings for one year, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 26. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 27. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 28. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. R:\$TAFFRFI~V2PAg'7.CC1 12/'23/F'/~ I 7 29. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 30. Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 31. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 32. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 33. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994). 34. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 35. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 36. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 37. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 38. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. 39. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 40. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 41. Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 42. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturers engineer are required for plan review submittal. 43. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. FIRE DEPARTMENT 44. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy and use and Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. R:~TAFFRPTL392PAg?.CC1 12/23/9'7 mf 18 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2,500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 903.2, Appendix Ill.A). The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 %" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B). If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 70,000 lbs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 70,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (UFC sec 902 and Ord. 95-15). Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6)inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord. 95-15). Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4). Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). R:\gTAFFR.P'I~92PA97.CC1 12/23197 mf 19 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3). Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15). Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system(s) in the following buildings: B, C, D, F-l, F-2, F-3, G, I and J. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15). Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system(s) monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10). Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (UFC 902.4). All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4). Provide a four-hour area separation wall without any penetrations or openings with a parapet as required by the Uniform Fire Code Appendix Ilia Sec 4, to limit separate fire areas, between building F-1 (Diner) and building F-2 (Celebrity Theater). Building F-1 is over the allowable square footage for a type VN construction, provide an two hour area separation wall as required by the Uniform Building Code for allowable floor area. Building F-3 (Honky-Tonk Music Theater) and building F-2 (Celebrity Theater) provide a four hour area separation wall as required by the Uniform Building Code for the separation mixed types of construction. R:\~TAFFRPT~92PAg?.CCI ;12/23/97 mf 20 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. General Requirements 62. A Grading Permit for rough and/or precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 63. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 64. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 65. All roadway, slope and utility easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 66. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 67. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18 months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. at Western Bypass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) from the intersection of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Vincent Moraga Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension to south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor and restriping of the existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road to accommodate the proposed improvements. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. R:~I'AFFRPT~9'2PA97.CCI 12/23/97 mf ~ 1 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. C. In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive "T" intersection configuration with Vincent Moraga Drive. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. d. First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension from Pujol Street west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. e. Affect the full improvements of the Main Street extension from Pujol Street west to the project site's proposed escalators for the pedestrian connection. f. Storm drain facilities within the road right-of-way. g. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). h. Erosion control and slope protection. i. Sewer and domestic water systems located within the road right-of-way. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. R:\STAFFRlVFL39'2PAF7.CC1 12/23197 mf 22 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The impact of the site to any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and to any adjacent floodways and necessary protection mitigation measures shall be identified. Adequacy of capacity of existing and proposed downstream drainage facilities shall be verified. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecula Fire Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Cable TV Franchise Caltrans Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company Fish & Game Army Corps of Engineers The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CCI 12/23/~'/mf 23 79. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 80. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. 81. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed "Western bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive" in accordance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 82. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 83. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 84. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: ao Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. bl Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A, 208, and 401 (curb and sidewalk). C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. P.:\$TAFFRPTX392PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 24 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to allow for adequate ~rov~e For ,,-~,~,,-~,,-~ sight distance and visibility. (Amended at the Planning Commission hearing December 15, 1997). g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. Private roads MUST be designed by the engineer of record, reviewed, and approved by the Department of Public Works to meet City Public Road Standards or otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. This should include but may not be limited to' a. Minimum paved road widths of 32 feet within adequate right-of-ways or easements. b. Knuckles being required at 90° 'bends' in the road. c. Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards. d. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. e. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required. 90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. g. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°). Concentrated on-site runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public Works. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. R:~TAFFRPT~2PA~.CC1 12/2.3/~/mf 2 5 92. 93. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following Engineering conditions: a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense. b. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. C. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. d. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. e. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. All parkways, open areas, on-site slopes and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. ii. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 26 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 94. The Developer shall complete the following infrastructure improvements prior to issuance of any occupancy: Western B.v.~ass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed from the intersection of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Vincent Morae_a Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) shall be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate the proposed improvements. In relation to the above item, Ridoe Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to -- form) a "T" intersection with Vincent Moraga Drive. First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from Pujol Street shall be extended west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. A traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates that the First Street/Western By_oass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is recommended, therefore, that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise scheduling of this installation by the Developer. Moreover, when constructed this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the traffic signal proposed at the Front Street/State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection. A traffic signal at the First Street/Western Bypass Corridor intersection and interconnection with the traffic signal proposed at the Front Street/State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection. The applicant shall enter into an Agreement and post securities for the construction of interim improvements to the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 (I-15) interchange as follows: At the Rancho California Road/I-15 northbound on ramps, on the westbound intersection approach, widen and/or re-stripe Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual) separate left turn lane at the 1-15 south on ramp, one through lane, one optional through right turn lane and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right turning traffic onto the I-1§ north on ramp, widening and/or re-striping may be required just north of Rancho California Road. These two lanes should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of 1-15 north. Similar widening and/or restriping shall be provided on the eastbound intersection approach at the Rancho California Road/I-15 south ramps. R:\~I'AF~92PAF7.CCl 12/23/9'7 mf 2 7 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101, 102. 103. The agreement shall require that construction of the interim improvements commence within twenty-four (24) months of issuance of any grading permit. Negotiable securities in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and an amount acceptable to the City Engineer shall be provided by the applicant guaranteeing the faithful performance of this obligation. Should the City proceed with construction of the ultimate improvements for the interchange ahead of the applicant, then the applicant shall contribute to the City's improvement project an amount equal to the cost of the interim improvements. Applicant shall contribute their share within thirty (30) days of the City's award of the construction contract for the ultimate improvements. The applicant's contribution to the construction of the ultimate improvements shall relieve the applicant from all responsibility regarding the timing for completion of the improvements at 1-15 and Rancho California Road. The Developer shall affect construction of full improvements of the Main Street extension from Pujol Street west to the project site's proposed escalators for the pedestrian connection. Sufficient parking for a local transit system shall be provided to satisfy the parking demands of the project. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City Standards and in compliance with the site traffic impact analyses, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping shall be installed per the approved traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping plan, respectively. The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works R:\~X'AFFRPT~92PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 28 104. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES 105. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated November 19, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 106. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 19, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 107. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's transmittal dated December 5, 1997, a copy of which is attached. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing December 16, 1997}. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Applicant Name R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 29 TO: FROM RE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: November 19, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Matthew Fagan ~GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO PA97-0392 1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No PA97-0392 and has no objections. 2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a f~xture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. GD:cr (909) 285-8980 Board of Directors: Michael IL McMillan I'res~dent Csaba F. Ko St. V~ce Pren*dent Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman Dong Kuiberg · Jeffrey L Minider George M. Woods Of~cers: John F. Hennigar General Manager Phillip L. Forbes Director of Finance- Treasm-er E. P. "Bob" Lemons Director of Engineering Kenneth C. Dealy Director of Operatlon.~ & Maintenance Perry R. Louck Controller Linda M. Fregoso District $ecretaryiAdmlnistrative Services ~anager C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Cousmel November 19, 1997 Mr. Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMENT CENTER APNS 940-310-013, 940-320-001, AND 940-320-002 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 Dear Mr. Fagan: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements (including all in-tract facilities) between RCWD and the property owner. It may be necessary for the property owner to extend existing District water facilities to provide domestic/commercial and fire protection services to this development. Owner should contact RCVVD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCVVD. In response to your request, RCWD has provided the attached information. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, PANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 97/SB:eb3001F012c/FCF C~ Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician Attachment Rancho California Water District 4213.~ Winches,er Road · P-~t Office B,~x .tK*IT ° T,:m,~cula. ('~tlif¥,rn~a .92.~89-9017 ° ~*og*~Tt-;-,llltl o FAX ;9t~9~ ~7g-061R DAVID P. ZAPPE Ocncral Managcr-Chicf Engineer City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: ~V~ i~TTH Ladies and Gentlemen: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/275-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 7829.1 The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific *interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project invo!ves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrabve fees will be required. V,-~This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or_ larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be ~c0nslde?ed regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownershi'~ of such"facilities on written req..u. est of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Distdct plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ~ This project is located within the limits of the District's ~UR.~.IF.,I'/~ ~J~.£F..,t~/TF..,I'IE, CLll. h [l'l;tl.,t,~ Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees shoull:l be paid by cashier'.,', check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of°building or grading permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, reco(dation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain,. then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans 'and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit fro_rn the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control. Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, Senior Civil Engineer Date: t Z.-' ~ "C:~-'7 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RATIONALE FOR APPEAL R:\STAFFRPT~921'A97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 30 California Registration: Civil Engineer No. 7697 ~tmctural Engineer No. 650 ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brimon Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Eraall: sampratt~alphainfo. corn) (909) 699-8689 Monday, December 22, 1997 Mrs. June Greek City Clerk Temecula City Council City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6444 FAX (909)694-1999 Subject: Appeal to Temecula City Council - Request for Denial of Approval of Planning Commission's Action of December 15, 1997, on Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit), Applicant: TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman) Reference Documents which are a matter of Record with the City of Temecula and are included by reference in support of this appeal: Case No. 280260 - CerOfied Administrative Record of the Proceedings of the City of Temecula concerning the City's 1996. Approval of Modifications of Portions of the Conditions of Approval for a Master Conditional Use Permit, A Tentative Tract Map and the Westside Specific Plan. Trial Date: October 25, 1996. Volumes 1 through 6. Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan) Applicant: Forest City Development, Inc. Temecula City Manager's Letter of June 20. 1997 A.S. Pratt Letter to Temecula Plmming Commission of June 2, 1997 A.S. Pratt Letter to Temecula City Manager, Temecula City Council, Temecula Planning Commission and Temecula Redevelopment Agency of June 29, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan- Appeal), Hearing of August 4, 1997 at 7:00 PM Addendum to At~eal filed on July 21, .1.997, Applicant: Forest City Development, Inc., Appellant: Albert S. Pratt, Dated August 4, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan), Applicant: TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman), Dated October 6, 1997, Request for Denial of Approval by Planning Commission of PA97-0392 ( Conditional Use Permit), Applicant, Dated December 15, 1997. (Attached) Petition for Writ of Mandate filed December 17, 1997, with the Clerk of the Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 305925. ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Eraall: samprat~alphainfo. corn) (909) 699-8689 California R,gistration: Civil EnS/neer No. 7697 g~iland F~i~leer lqo. 650 Press Enterprise article of December 18, 1997, indicating proposed location of Convention Ccnt~ (Attached) Press Enterprise article of December 18, 1997, "Convention center deal is urged". Members of the City Council: I am appealing the decision of the approval of the Planning Commission of PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) and requesting that this decision be denied by the Council. This application for a Conditional Use Permit continues the attempts of the City Staff, Planning Department, Planning Commission and City Council forcing the acceptance the Applicant TEV, Inc.'s (Zev Buffman) Revised/Expanded Project without the preparation and circulation of a Subsequent or Supplement Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") in violation of CEQA Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. The magnitude of this immense project never ceases to grow, and now it is proposed that a 16.0 acre site for a Convention Center is requested by two of our Councilmen in addition to the Revised/Expanded Project of the Applicant, TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman). I cannot believe that you think the taxpaying citizens of Temecula are so naive as to not know that you are deliberately inflating the cost of improvements to 'allow money for the applicant or the City to construct major portions of the Revised~xpanded Project. I cannot believe that you think the taxpaying citizens of Temecula are so na'fve as to not know that you are deliberately "piecemealing this total project in violation of CEQA, by not preparing a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. Application PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit)must be denied. ~lbcrr $. Pratt California Regi~n'~tion: Civil Englne*r No. 7697 Igtructm~ ~.ngineer No. 1550 ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (Email: sampratt(¢alphainfo. corn) (909) 699-8689 Monday, December 15, 1997 Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Subject: Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) Applicant: TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman) Members of the City of Tem¢cula Planning Commission: In your deliberations, you are appointed to see the "forest not the trees". The "forest" is all of the citizens of Temecula and their continuing concern over all impacts on their daily environment. The "trees" are a select group of Old Town merchants and property owners, and other special business interests supported by a biased City govenunent. We want to save our "forest", all the citizens of Temec~fla Location: of the Project West of Old Town Temecula (100 feet west of Pujol Street), 700 feet south of Ridge Park Drive and east of the City's western border, within the City's Westside Specific Plan.. Propos'd: The design and operation of a total of 203,300 square t~et of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and e, ssociated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres. Reference Documents which are a matter of Record wifl~ tim City of Temecula and are included by reference in support of this appeal.: Case No. 280260 - Certified Adm'mistrative Record of the Proceedings of the Ciw of Temecula concerning the City's 1996 Approval of Modifications of Po~lions of the Conditions of Approval for a Master Conditional Use Permit, A Tentative Tract Map and the Westside Specific Plan. Trial Date: October 252 1996. Volum~ I through 6. Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan) Applicant: Forest City Development, Inc. ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brixton Cove Temectfia, CA 92591 (909) 699-8689 California Regi~l~ntion: Civil Fnglneer No. 7697 filtructur~l E. nsineer No, 650 Temecula City Manager's Letter of June 20. 1997 A.S. Pratt Letter to Temecula Planning Commission of June 2, 1997 A.S. Pratt Letter to Temecula City Manager, Temecula City Council, Temecula Planning Commission and Temecula Redevelopment Agency of June 29, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Development Plan - Appeal), Hearing of August 4, 1997 at 7:00 PM Addendum to, Appeal filed on July 21, 1997, Applicant: Forest City Development, Inc., Appellant: Albert S. Pratt, Dated August 4, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan), Applicant: TEV, Inc. (Zev Buffman), Dated October 6, 1997, and all documents Appellant, Albert S. Pratt has submitted which are part of the Record of the Proceedings. Added reference material: Inland Empire Business Journal, Volume 9, Number 12, December, 1997, portion of Page 5, Article "RogersDale USA Brings Western Theme to Temecula", by Rebecca Jo James (attached). Partial quotes from the article: "'This was a batfie that I was not prepared for' said Zev Buffman, key executive with the Temecula Entertainment Center. 'A series of opponents played hard ball with personal attacks and character assignations.' 'But contracts between the Roy Rogers family and 'remecula have been signed sealed and delivered - sounding a death knell to the battle'. 'And the merchants of Temecula will be throwing the final gauntlet, but this time at Sam Pratt'. 'They have united and hired a major law firm out of Los Angeles to file a lawsuit against Pratt,' Buffman said. 'They feel he has cost them their livelihood and loss of income.' RogersDale USA will be the biggest live entertainment project in Southern California since Universal City Studios was built, said Buffman." These statements absolutely certify my allegations in the above referenced documents of record with the Ci.ty and presonted before the Planning Commission and City Council. This Revised/Expanded Project is only a small "piece" of the "biggest live entertainment project in Southern California since Universa.[City Studi.os .was Built, said. Buffman." "How can you people say, on the one hand, that this project will be bigger than Un/vemal City Studios, and on the other, that you don't need an EIR? Don't the people of Temecula deserve to know what this project will do to their city.?" ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (909) 699-8689 Calilbmia RegisU'ation: Civil Engineer No. 7697 Structural 'Engineer No. 650 Annual attendance noted in the Price Waterhouse Report prepared for the Original Old Town Redevelopment Project m 1993, (University City Studios) was 5,000,000 patrons a." .... ,u.,. r:. .... .-,'?~'- '~'~r we could expect an additional 1,000,000 patrons annually. This is 6,000,000 patrons per year. To put this in perspective this is 115,385 patrons per week. With 80% on Friday and Saturday, 46,138 patrons per day on the weekends or each week end day equals the total population of Iemecula. This is not acceptable for this community. It is impossible to mitigate this amount of additional traffic. This is probably the largest "piecemealing" of a project ever encountered in California and violates CEQA and CEQA Guidelines. Quoting from the Guide to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Authors Remy, Thomas, Moose and Yeates, page 183, "Thus, because the expansion was reasonably foreseeable, and was likely to change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects, the EIR should have informed the public and decision makers of the impacts that were likely to result from the expansion.". I contacted the office of the publisher, by phone, of the Inland Empire Business Journal. The dead line for articles to be published in the December, 1997, issuo was November 20, 1997. Mr. Buffman had full knowledge prior to this date of his plans. As the principal Applicant in this proposed, immense ~roiect, was in constant contact with the City of Temecula, Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager and other support departments within the City management structure. The Planning Commission and City Council had full knowledge of the Applicants plans yet approved "piecemealing" of applications in violation of CEQA and GEQA Guidelines. This Planning Application PA97-0392, is yet another attempt to deceive the taxpayers and citizens of Temecula on the immensity of the proposed project. This is no longer a comment on the adequacy of a "staged" traffic analysis, but on how to cope with a "traffic disas.ter". In the last CiB, Council meeting, approval was given for an Assessment District to float $30,000,000 in bonds. This will allow the applicant to use "public money" for the construction of access roads, site improvements and enough left over to build the Wild West Al'ena and start this immense project without the Applicant having to find private financing. In addition, a Community Facilities District is planned to maintain the project. How can our elected and appointed officials supported by the City Manager and Staff deceive those who elected them and pay taxes to support them? Cniiforni& Regislration: Civil Engineer No. 7697 Struclura} Engineer No. 650 ALBERT S. PRATT 40470 Brixton Cove Temecula, CA 92591 (909) 699-8689 The statement: "'They have united and hired a major law finn out of Los Angeles to file a lawsuit against Pratt,' BtdTman said." This statement abridges, Albert S. Pratt, my public right of protest of a project which I feel is detrimental to the environment of our City. The City Council should not allow such comments to occur, but protect my rights as an individual, and those rights of the several thousand registered voters who are in opposition to this project in Temecula. I intend to contact the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and ask ff the comments by Councilmen Linderoans; "that he intends to get rid of me once and for all", and City Manager Bradley's malicious public attempt to discredit my testimony on traffic in the Forest City Mall Appeal violated my right of protest before a public body, and particularly enforced with the knowledge they had of the. magnitude of the proposed Buffman Project, and the City's involvement. Application PA97-0392 must be denied. The many public comments by our elected officials, the City Manager and those in support of the Buffman Project apparently do not understand our position. We are opposed to any public money, indirect support such as Assessment Districts, Community Facilities Districts, Redevelopment Districts or any entity where public funds can bc funneled into private development projects. CEQA does require the decision makers to consider alternative sites in order to reduce significant impacts. "I therefore propose that you prepare a supplemental or subsequent EIR to cotraider, among other requirements, an alternate location for Rogc-r~Dal¢ that would reduce the tremendous impacts on traffic". CEQA Public Resources Code Section 21002, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15065. We suggest the Applicants consider the area of the Glen Elen Ampitheater developed by Zcv Buffman. San Bernardino County is familiar with the financial paths required for public funds to be funneled into private entertainment projects and the location is adjacent to the I-15 Freeway, the major artery to Las Vegas. RogersDale can be developed in a location much closer to the Apple Valley area in which they are now established. Albert S. Pratt INLAND it .tIRE BUSINESS JOURNAL - PAGE al ii ii i ii ii ii iiii i y. Ban.k =Committed. RogersDale USA B ngs We ern Thetne' Tetnecu the I '' as of hi.. _ production 'lines. These factors, accompanied by the general eco- nomic growth, allow us to join in the successes of our client base," commented Russell M. Moore, first vice president nnd manager of the Inland 'Empire Commercial ring the des and DECEMBER 1997 eporting ns and ,. Schools m, 11.3 ~6, lev- t million ase from deposit rs to the ank~ Inland Emigre Management team ir ~hown hem: rian Raymon~ Debra C, oodu~ W~'. ".~off" Burger Moore, Scott Millet;, H_,~t__or ~utierrez, Steve yon Raics Banking Center. Community Bank's commercial banicing centera offer real estate loans, accounts receivable financing and working' capital lines along with a wide range of cash manngement and international services. "Continued bnnk mergers in the Inland Empire and throughout Southern California offer an oppor- tunity for Community Bank to demonstrate its personalized Partnership BankingS) approach to business. 'Customer service' is an over-used term in the banking industry, nnd with many institutions it is almost an oxymoron. The larg- er banks use a standardized deliv- ery mechanism to meet customers' needs, treating each client the same and 'allowing no-deviations. Every relation- ;0 years d Cook, ablished ~tives to ties in a dffomia ire pres- : of the Inland ~ offices ;,. San and er sup- :e reside ,mmuni- in local · by Rebecca Jo James Buffman has. side-stepped this It's only a couple of blocks long and nestled in the foothills of the Temecula valley. But many a war has been fought over lesser ground, and the war in Temecula is no different. In spite of warring factions, RogersDale USA in Old Town Temecula has triumphed over a five- year battle lead by Sam Pratt. "This was a battle that I was not [~y executive with the Ten~ a -~_,nte~'ht Center. "A series of -bpponents played hard baH_~_'~ pe.~- ~1 attarand character assassi- ncontracts between the Roy -' ---- -- -- -- and Temexula have seal~.~ and de~ered sounding a_death knell to the battle.' - And the merchants of TernecOa _ -- ~l be ~;w~.~,. g~the ~ gaunti~ $u~'-t~ time at ~ Pratt,. ~ United and hired a major law nrta out Of Los Angeles '~ie a lawsuit a~n~t ~q'attf said. "I'ney feel he has cost them_ .... their'. livelihood and loss of income." __ · - deadline... particular battle. Now, with the Rogers family on board, he is getting on with the business of RogersDale USA. Th~s m~an~ putting together ·an honorary board -- with Angela landsbury agreeing to be his first _ member.. "Collectively, Roy and Dale have been in the entertainment busi- ness for 60 years," Buffman explained. "We are going to have a friend of theirs on board to represent every year- sixty stats for sixty years." RogersDale USA will be~the, ~' bi~RR~t live ent--~ -~ent oroj.ect i~. · |'~ou~em california since Univ_cmal_ -' ,ditto ~,_o~ _~;It / , · \ : "We--d~n t have anything to cel- ~ ebrate the Western culture, music or ~ heroes of the past," Buffman said. | "Wherever you go in the world, when people ask .about America,- they relate it to the Old West. Old Town Temecula is the weekend-in- the-country feeling that we .were try- ingto achieve ~ go back 100 years into the west. continued from Page 3 said. "And it 1ooks.as.ff we'll break even that record." It took six years for the center to sell its first 100,000 cars and just 40 months to reach the 200,000 mark, according to Lampartec Airport Asks ClUes for Funding The San Bernardino Inter- national Airport authority decided in late November to ask four local cities and the county to continue funding the airport. borrow from the city and county of San Bernardino. Agencies that don't agree to contribute financially to, the airport will be forced off the airport authori- ty board..Colton Mayor Karl Oaytan, a member of the airport authority, said the city is prepared to do its part. The move was the latest in an 18-month struggle to fund tbe air- port; As part of the struggle, local municipalities rather than bond investors have taken on the financial burden. · The major issue is whether the airport will bc able to pay its optrat- Convention center deal is urged Two Temectda cotmcilrnen want the city to purchase 16 acres next to the planned RogersDale complex, but support is iffy. By Tim O'Leary The Press-Enterprise .......... ~MECUIJ A pair of City Council members haw proposed that the city buy 16 acres nex~ a planned Western-mcrae entertainmen complex for a convention center. But the proposal is far from a sure deal Although councilmen Karet Lindemaf~ and Steven Ford look favorably on such m arrangement. Mayor Ron Roberts says is leaning against it. A fourth counci member, Jeff Stone, cannot vote on plan because of a conflict of interest. Because a 2-2 tie would mean propo~l would be defeated. that leave newly elected Councilman Jeff Comer chero as the swing vote. He has not mad~ up his mind. Four council members spent more thai an hour Monday night in closed sesstol discussing me possible purcl~ase. After ward, Lindemens a_iked for a public dis cussion of the issue on Jan. 13. Lindemarts .said the council would b~ remiss if it did not grab the chance to the land at a low price before the Roge~ Dale U.S.A. entertainment complex be comes a tourist magnet. Linderoans and Ford said a conventira center is also needed for local facterie and businesses that want to hold tra& shows, seminars and corporate re~ No cost figures have been discussed. Mayor Ron Roberts said he is leahint against the land deal. Roberts said h~ promised voters during the Nov. ,1 electIra that no new city funds would be spent the entertainment complex and some construe the city's purchase of land fron the complex's developer as aiding RoseroDale project. "It would be hard for me to vote for because of my previous statements," said. "It was a campaign promise. I was no LAND Continued from ~- i entertainment complex and he dic not attend Tuesday's closed session discussion. His conflict of interest will prevent him from participat- ing in next month's hearing on the possible purchase. Speaking as a citizen, .Stone ,:, itt- cized the plan. "I'm not in support of any land acquisition or spending o~' pubhc money to subsidize the financing of the project," Stone said. tie also questioned the selection of devel- oper John Firestone's land for a convention center, saying a loca- tion closer to city cornmercia! areas would be better. "Why that site has been chosen or ~ought of by those council members is puzzling to me." gtc, ne said. Firestone said he is willing cooperate and sell the site to J(ictty. However, city funds ctr¢ b~..~'~led to secure financing tel' entertainmenl complex. he stud. '7I don't need anything. [';~,. 2 pretty good shape. I don't neeti city to help me," Firestone Project opponent Sam Print sate ~e was perplexed by lhv bald "I don't kllow, it s,unds lik{. m)vel, like old-f~s~it)m'~ j~li~,-- Praa mid. ~velopment plans tail for stone, who owns abou[ 150 acr~ i~e hills west of Old Town. to a 4,800-seat arena, 2,200-seat aum- iorium, viSual-reality ode, and other buildin~ and ie~e mere ~, Buffman and the Roy Roge~ fam- ily ~o operate. The ~ile include- nearly five acres for a 250-roun~ hotel that would be built by er developer, While a co~ven{ion center wou/,', be an ~et to the Roge~Daic project, Buffman said a land would be strictly betw~n Fire- stone and the city and im approva~ or rejection would hart: no on the ente~ainment ,'ompiex. "If they want to do ~r. Buffman said. "If nol. t.:ur will go on ~s iI iS Lindemarts said lie the developers drier ~'e;li,zi~Ig . ,',invention center would I)¢' :: Ler ~se for the site mt,~ ~11~: ~'~ attohal vehicle park Firestone plans there. tie ;lrid J'~>ld :-,i;,. t~uymg the land would .qnq)ly taking advantage of ll!(t prOlt'~ ~ /..' u~mg city funds io h~-.ip li Comercnero said he is on the fence. H~ said the previous council pledged not t( spend city money on tl~e cnte~ainmen, complex. He does not know whether th~ land purchase would meet it:at definltiort "I don't have enough informanon Yet,' he said. "We recognize that. when i~ involves Mr. (Zev) Buffman's orc, iect, i: becomes very sensitive territory'. L,ntil w~ see what they're talking about and why, 1'11 keep an open mind and review ~he dam." Because Stone owns land m Old Town he has not participated in past vor::.~ on the i ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT (DECEMBER 15, 1997) R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.CC1 12/23/97 mf 31 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 15, 1997 Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: , MAKE a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and an Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and findings that a subsequent EIR is not required; and . ADOPT Resolution No. 97- approving Planning Application No. PA97-0392 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: TEV, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Engineering Ventures PROPOSAL: The design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres LOCATION: West of Old Town Temecula (100 feet west of Pujol Street), 700 feet south of Ridge Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive and east of the City's western border EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan (SP), Light Industrial (LI) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Light Industrial (LI) Specific Plan (SP) - Westside Specific Plan Specific Plan (SP) - Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Specific Plan (SP) - Westside Specific Plan PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested R:\STAFFRPTX392PA97.PCI 12/10/97 ~b 1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP), High Density Residential (H) and Light Industrial (LI) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Single-family residences/multi-family residences West: Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area: 16.5 acres Total Building Area: 203,300 square feet Total Landscape Area: 143,748 square feet Total Hardscape Area: 36,712 square feet Total Parking Area: 334,980 square feet Parking Spaces Required: 1,034 spaces Parking Spaces Provided: 904 spaces BACKGROUND A pre-application submittal for the project was made on October 30, 1997, with staff providing comments on this submittal to the applicant on November 4, 1997. The formal application submittal was made on November 10, 1997. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 20, 1997. The project was deemed complete on December 2, 1997. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the design, construction and operation of approximately 203,300 square feet of entertainment, retail and restaurant space, with associated landscaping, hardscape and parking. The building uses and square footages are detailed in the table below: Phase II Building Area Tabulation Building (Letter Corresponds to Plaza Plan) Welcome Center (A) Retail Shops & Major Retail (B) Retail Shops, Music Plaza, Food & Retail (C) Virtual Reality Ride, Penny Arcade & Restaurant (D) Building Square Footage 1,000 square feet 25,000 square feet Roy Rogers Experience, Retail Shops, Diner, Honky-Tonk Music Theater & Celebrity Theater (F) 10,000 square feet 17,000 square feet Visitor Information (E) 1,500 square feet 100,600 square feet R:\STAFFRP'IZ392PA97.PC1 12/10/97 tab 2 Building (Letter Corresponds to Plaza Plan) Building" square Footage : '" Retail Shops (G) 8,000 square feet Chapel (H) 1,800 square feet Retail Shops (I) 5,000 square feet Studio Theater, Restaurant, Food 33,400 square feet Exposition & Native American Store (J) Total (A-J) 203,300 square feet ANALYSIS The project is Phase II of a larger project. Phase I (Planning Application No. PA97-0298 - Development Plan) was approved by the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and consists of the construction and operation of a 103,564 square foot, 4,800 seat arena and associated improvements (hardscape, parking, landscaping and roadways). Hardscape improvements include: the arena, walkways, driveways, parking areas and drainage facilities. Landscape improvements include: slopes on the west side of the Western By-Pass Corridor, all on-site slopes, streetscape on First Street, the Western By-Pass Corridor (including median landscaping), and Vincent Moraga Drive. Roadway improvements include: First Street, the Western By-Pass Corridor, and Vincent Moraga Drive. An appeal of the Commission's approval was filed and the City Council upheld the Commission's decision at their November 18, 1997 hearing. The details of the components of Phase II are discussed below. Exhibit D (Site Plan) depicts Phases I and II of the project. Phase II components include parking facilities at the northern and southern ends of the project. These parking areas tie into the existing circulation system and will add to the parking necessary for the function of the overall project (both Phases). Ten buildings, of various sizes, are proposed within Phase II. They are centrally located in the project, and are laid out in a manner which creates streetscapes internal to the project. The details of this area will be discussed below in the Plaza Plan. Vehicular and pedestrian linkages provided to Old Town along First Street, Vincent Moraga Drive and the Western By-Pass Corridor from Phase I will apply to this component of the project. Exhibit E (Plaza Plan) shows the building footprints, as well as the amenities which are included in this area. As discussed above, the buildings are laid out in a manner which creates streetscapes interior to the project. Hardscape items such as walkways and streets are called out on the plan. In addition, a detailed landscape concept has been included on the plan. Mature trees (minimum 36" box) are proposed. Shrubs, turf and groundcover are also utilized in this area to complement the outdoor seating and open spaces areas. A pond is proposed to the west of the Chapel. The applicant has expressed concerns regarding visibility of businesses and associated signage within the plaza area. They want to provide fewer large R:\STAFFRIr~392PA9?.PC1 12110/9/klb 3 trees in lieu of many small trees (15 gallon is the minimum required in the Westside Specific Plan). Staff is comfortable with this approach for the following reasons. First, the larger trees will be placed adjacent to areas where people will gather and/or rest. Secondly, larger trees will provide more shade to the project in the short-run and an equivalent amount of shade to the project in the long-run. Lastly, fewer, larger trees will allow the variety and interest of the building facades to be more visible; thereby allowing the character of the development to be fully appreciated by the patrons. Landscaoing Exhibit F, (Landscape Plan) shows the size and types of plants for the parking areas and slope plantings on the east side of the project (which serve as a buffer to the existing residences along Pujol Street). Similar to Phase I, a Condition of Approval has been added to the project which will require landscape and irrigation plans for all slope areas which will be disturbed by project grading be approved prior to the issuance of a grading permit. In addition, a Condition of Approval has been added which will require the applicant to post a bond for the installation of the slope landscaping and irrigation prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Staff feels the landscape plans are comprehensive and addressed the concerns raised by the Planning Commission at the original workshop for this project regarding buffering the residences along Pujol Street from the project. Architecture Section II.A.5.b of the Westside Specific Plan contains Design Guidelines for three architectural styles: Western, Spanish Colonial and Monterey. The majority of the project fits within these three styles, and those elements visible from the public view are consistent with these styles. Other styles are proposed within the internal steetscape of the project which are not specifically identified in the Design Guidelines of the Westside Specific Plan. However, the Specific Plan does allow some flexibility. Section III.D. of the Specific Plan allows exceptions when deviations from the standards are minor and no impact will occur affecting the public health and safety of adjacent properties. Staff has determined that this exception may be granted because the elevations proposed which are not within the Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan are internal to the project, are minor and will not impact the public health and safety of adjacent properties. The architectural styles of the development span many eras, with the culmination of the 20th Century area. Colors and materials for each of the styles are reflective of those used during that specific era. Two historical advertisement signs have been included within the project which staff feels function as architectural features. These signs will be allowed to display historic advertisements and will not be visible off-site. Three typical detailed elevations have been included as exhibits for the project. The purpose of these exhibits is to provide precise details of colors and materials used for each style. Since there are ten buildings, with several elevations for each building, staff and the applicant agreed that the three typical elevations would serve to present the intent for the colors and materials used for all of the proposed conceptual elevations. The intent is for all buildings to use authentic, high quality materials which will foster high-quality design. All designs/elevations R:\STAFFRPT~F2PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb 4 will need to conform with the intent of these typical elevations. This is clarified in the Conditions of Approval. Building heights range from a maximum height of 68' for the Celebrity Theater to 35' feet for the Honky-Tonk Theater. The maximum height for structures in this area is 150 feet, per the Westside Specific Plan. The majority of the project will be at the height of a two story building. Many false second story elements are proposed, as well as several tower elements. Staff feels the use of multiple architectural styles, well articulated facades, varied roof lines and the use of tower features throughout the project will create an interesting and pedestrian oriented feel to the development. Traffic/Parking Analysis Traffic for Phase II was analyzed and addressed during Phase I (Planning Application No. PA97- 0298 - Development Plan). All mitigation measures from the Old Town Redevelopment Project, including those required for traffic mitigation, shall apply to this phase of the project. The applicant is proposing that parking on the site be shared amongst the various venues. Based upon a shared parking analysis, the applicant stated that this would result in an overall reduction in the amount of parking spaces which would be needed for the project. In order to support their claim, Staff requested that the applicant provide an analysis which examined the parking requirements for the project and justified a reduction in the amount of required parking. Attachment No. 2 contains the Analysis prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated November 4, 1997. This analysis is built upon a previously prepared analysis for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. The analysis looked at a worse-case scenario for parking demand at the site. On page 8 of the analysis, it was determined that for the peak season weekday scenario, maximum parking demand would occur between 7:30 and 8:30 pm, when 1,971 vehicles would be parked on-site. For the peak weekend scenario, maximum demand is estimated to occur between 3:30 and 4:00 pm, when a maximum total of 2,351 vehicles would be parked on-site. It is stated on Page 8 of the analysis that the current site plan provides a total of 2,583 parking spaces, while the Westside Specific Plan requires a total of 2,755 parking spaces. The analysis concludes: "Based on the findings of the parking demand and parking accumulation analysis, the current site plan provides 232 parking spaces (9.9 percent) above the 2,351 parking spaces estimated for maximum peak season weekend parking accumulation." The shared parking analysis is based upon the fact that some visitors will go to more than one of the on-site attractions and as a result, fewer parking spaces will be required overall. Staff is comfortable with the methodology and findings in this analysis. A Condition of Approval has been added to the project which requires the applicant apply for a Minor Exception for approval by the Planning Manager for a reduction in the amount of required parking, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Should the applicant propose any modifications to the uses which would intensify the need for parking, a subsequent study would be required to determine if the parking is adequate or if additional parking facilities need to be provided. In addition, Condition of Approval No. 9 of Planning Application No. PA97-0298 addressed this issue. This Condition states: "Prior to any expansion to the seating capacity (above 4,800 R:\STAFFRPTL392PAg'7.PCI 12110/97 it. lb 5 seats) of the arena, or the application submittal of Phase II of the project, whichever comes first, the applicant shall submit three (3) copies of a parking study to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for review and approval. Said study shall analyze the adequacy of existing parking facilities, the possibility and feasibility of reciprocal parking, and make recommendations for the amount of additional parking which will be required to accommodate the uses on-site." GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY A General Plan consistency analysis was performed for the Old Town Redevelopment Project and was included as an Attachment for Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan). Staff reviewed this analysis and determined the project (both Phases I and II) were consistent with that analysis, and therefore were consistent with the General Plan. The applicant performed an analysis entitled uWestside Specific Plan Project Description and Consistency Evaluation" (Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report) which made a determination that the project as proposed is consistent with the Westside Specific Plan. Staff reviewed the analysis and determined the project was consistent with the Westside Specific Plan. The Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report was included in the Addendum to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. This Addendum was approved by the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and the City Council on November 18, 1997. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Addendum to the previously certified EIR for this project was prepared. It was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and the City Council on November 18, 1997. This project is included on the scope of that Addendum and the previously certified EIR, therefore, no further environmental review will be required for this project. Staff recommends the Commission make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and an Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and findings that a subsequent EIR is not required. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project consists of the design, construction and operation of approximately 203,300 square feet of entertainment, retail and restaurant space, with associated landscaping, hardscape and parking. The project is Phase II of a larger project. Phase I (Planning Application No. PA97- 0298 - Development Plan) was approved by the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997. An appeal of the Commission's approval was filed and the City Council upheld the Commission's decision at their November 18, 1997 hearing. The buildings are laid out in a manner which creates streetscapes interior to the project. The landscape plan shows the size and types of plants for the parking areas and slope plantings on the east side of the project (which serve as a buffer to the existing residences along Pujol Street). Section II.A.5.b of the Westside Specific Plan contains Design Guidelines for three architectural styles: Western, Spanish Colonial and Monterey. The majority of the project fits within these R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PCI 12/10/97 klb 6 three styles, and those elements visible from the public view are consistent with these styles. Other styles are proposed within the internal steetscape of the project which are not specifically identified in the Design Guidelines of the Westside Specific Plan. However, the Specific Plan does allow some flexibility. Traffic for Phase II was analyzed and addressed during Phase I (Planning Application No. PA97- 0298 - Development Plan). All mitigation measures from the Old Town Redevelopment Project, including those required for traffic mitigation, shall apply to this phase of the project. The applicant is proposing that parking on the site be shared amongst the various venues. Staff is comfortable with the methodology and findings in this analysis. A Condition of Approval has been added to the project which requires the applicant apply for a Minor Exception for approval by the Planning Manager for a reduction in the amount of required parking, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Should the applicant propose any modifications to the uses which would intensify the need for parking, a subsequent study would be required to determine if the parking is adequate or if additional parking facilities need to be provided. The project (both Phases I and II) were consistent with that analysis, and therefore were consistent with the General Plan and the Westside Specific Plan. Staff is recommending that the Commission make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified and an Addendum to the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and findings that a subsequent EIR is not required. FINDINGS . The Project has been the subject of extensive prior environmental review and that no additional environmental review is needed for the following reasons: A. On July 13, 1995, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 95-49 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0031 (FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER," certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Westside Specific Plan and Planning Application No. PA95- 0003 (Westside Specific Plan) and changing the zone from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural - Twenty Acre Minimum Parcel Size) to S-P (Specific Plan) for the Property. a. An amendment to the project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 18, 1996 and by the City Council on March 26, 1996, at which time a finding was made that no further environmental review was required for the project; R:\STAFFRPT~PA~.~I 12/10/97 klb 7 C. Ds E. F. G. He The Staff of the Planning Department has prepared an Initial Environmental Study (IES), dated September 17, 1997, analyzing the proposed Development Plan and the prior environmental actions on the Project, which IES is incorporated herein by this reference. An Initial Environmental Study (IES) was conducted to determine if the project was within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95- 0031). Based upon this analysis, staff determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR be prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Addendum was prepared because changes and additions were necessary for the project, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Mitigation measures approved with the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95- 0031) will apply to this project. The proposed Project incorporates the provisions of the City's General Plan, the Westside Specific Plan, the current zoning regulations for the Property, the Mitigation Plan of Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (Final Environmental Impact Report) and such other ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, density, design, improvement, development fees, and construction standards applicable to the Property. All of the components of the proposed Project which might affect the environment were discussed and analyzed in Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). Minor changes to the project have been reviewed and examined in an Addendum to Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). Based on the evidence in the record before it, and after careful consideration of the evidence and the Addendum, the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and the City Council on November 18, 1997 made findings and determined that neither a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR was required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163. The elements of the Project, as described in the Conditional Use Permit were contemplated and fully and properly analyzed in the EIR certified and approved by the City Council on July 13, 1995 and the Addendum adopted on November 18, 1997. There have been no subsequent changes to the Project which would require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. R:\STAFFRPT~392PA97.PCI 12/10/97 Idb 8 J. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR which would show or tend to show that the Project might have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous FEIR. K. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR which would show or tend to show that significant effects previously examined might be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR. L. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternative previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. U. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Conditional Use Permit · The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project meets the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan, is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. . The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). . The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code· The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as designed and conditioned will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. R:\STAFFRPT~92PAg?.PCI 12/10/~7 klb 9 . The decision to conditionally approve the application is based upon substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. The Commission has received a copy of the Staff Report which includes the necessary analysis, findings and Conditions of Approval. In addition, the Commission has previously reviewed and recommended approval of an EIR and Addendum to the EIR, both of which were certified/adopted by the City Council and which addressed the impacts of this project on the environment and the necessary mitigation measures. Attachments: I . . PC Resolution - Blue Page 11 A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 17 Parking Study Update Letter - Blue Page 34 Adopted Addendum to Previously Certified EIR - Blue Page 3§ Exhibits - Blue Page 36 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C Zoning Map D. Site Plan E. Plaza Plan F. Landscape Plan G. Elevations H. Typical Elevations R:\$TANFRP'I~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb 1 0 ATTACHMENT NO. I RESOLUTION NO. 97- R:\$TAFFRPT~392PA97.PC1 12/10/97 kl~ '[ 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLSON NO. 97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TO PERMIT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TOTAL OF 203,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ARCADES, THEATERS AND SHOPS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING) ON 16.5 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (100 FEET WEST OF PUJOL STREET), 700 FEET SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE/VINCENT MORAGA DRIVE AND EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, WITHIN THE WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-013, 940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940-310- 047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320-003 ~, TEV, Inc. Company filed Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit), in accordance with the City.of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City. has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit), on December 15, 1997 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit); NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. ~ That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings; to wit: 1. The Project has been the subject of extensive prior environmental review and that no additional environmental review is needed for the following reasons: R:\STAFFRF~392PA97.PC1 12/10/97 ~ 1 2 A. On July 13, 1995, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 95-49 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 954)031 (FINAL ENVIRONMF.2qTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER," certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Westside Specific Plan and Planning Application No. PA95- 0003 (Westside Specific Plan) and changing the zone from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural - Twenty Acre Minimum Parcel Size) to S-P (Specific Plan) for the Property. B. An amendment to the project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 18, 1996 and by the City Council on March 26, 1996, at which time a finding was made that no further environmental review was required for the project; C. The Staff of the Planning Department has prepared an Initial Environmental Study (IF_S), dated September 17, 1997, analyzing the proposed Development Plan and the prior environmental actions on the Project, which IES is incorporated herein by this reference. D. An Initial Environmental Study (IF.S) was conducted to determine if the project was within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95-0031). Based upon this analysis, staff determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR be prepared pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Addendum was prepared because changes and additions were necessary for the project, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Mitigation measures approved with the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95-0031) will apply to this project. E. The proposed Project incorporates the provisions of the City's General Plan, the Westside Specific Plan, the current zoning regulations for the Property, the Mitigation Plan of Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (Final Environmental Impact Report) and such other ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, density, design, improvement, development fees, and construction standards applicable to the Property. All of the components of the proposed Project which might affect the environment were discussed and analyzed in Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). Minor changes to the project have been reviewed and examined in an Addendum to Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). F. Based on the evidence in the record before it, and after careful consideration of the evidence and the Addendum, the Planning Commission on October 6, 1997 and the City Council on November 18, 1997 made f'mdings and determined that neither a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR was required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163. R:\STAFFRFr~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb '~ ~3 G. The elements of the Project, as described in the Conditional Use Permit were contemplated and fully and properly analyzed in the EIR certified and approved by the City Council on July 13, 1995 and the Addendum adopted on November 18, 1997. H. There have been no subsequent changes to the Project which would require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. I. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. J. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR which would show or tend to show that the Project might have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous FEIR. K. There is no new infomarion since the certification of the previous FEIR which would show or tend to show that significant effects previously examined might be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR. L. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternative previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. M. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Section 3. Eiadiaga. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings for the Conditional Use Permit; to wit: 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project meets the Gc~s and Objectives of the General Plan, is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside R:\STAFFRFI~9'2PA97.1a{21 12/10/97 klb 14 Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines and Development Standards of the Westside Specific Plan and the applicable sections of the City's Development Code. The uses on-site will be compatible with each other in terms of intensity of use, scale and design. The uses proposed are consistent with the Westside Specific Plan and are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. There is adequate buffering between those uses on-site and those uses which are adjacent (off-site). 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project as designed and conditioned will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. 5. The decision to conditionally approve the application is based upon substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. The Commission has received a copy of the Staff Report which includes the neces~ analysis, findings and Conditions of Approval. In addition, the Commission has previously reviewed and recommended approval of an EIR and Addendum to the EIR, both of which were certified/adopted by the City Council and which addressed the impacts of this project on the environment and the necessary mitigation measures. Section 4. F_,/laditil~ That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) for to permit the design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres located west of Old Town Temecula (100 feet west of Pujol Street), 700 feet south of Ridge Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive and east of the City's western border, within the Westside Specific Plan and known as Assessor' s Parcel No. 940- 3104) 13, 940- 310-044, 940- 310-045, 940- 310-047, 940- 310-04 8, 940- 3204X)1,940-320-002, 940-320-003, and subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. R.-\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PCI 12/10/97 klb '[ ~ Section 5. PASSEl), APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1997. Linda Fahey, Chairman I HEREBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of December, 1997 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES' PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\$TAFFRPT~92PA97.PCI 12/10/97 klb I fi EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb '[ 7 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit) Project Description: The design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres Assessor's Parcel No.: 940-310-013, 940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940-310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320-003 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project , The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition. General Requirements . The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0392 is for the design, construction and operation of a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking and landscaping) on 16.5 acres. . The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA97-0392 (Conditional Use Permit). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. R:\$TAFFRPT~92PAT/.PCI 12/10/97 klb 18 . This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan) and Exhibit E (Plaza Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Bicycle racks shall be provided in conformance with the Westside Specific Plan. a. Architectural features which include advertising shall only be allowed to advertise items which historically tie into the architecture upon which these architectural features are located. . Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E (Plaza Plan) and Exhibit F (Landscape Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. . Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit G, or as amended by these conditions. . All buildings shall comply with the intent of the materials identified on Exhibit H (Typical Elevations). , Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit I (color and material book), or as amended by these conditions. 10. All conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan) shall apply to this project, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, for all slope areas created as a result of the grading operation, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for review and approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance). R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 ldb 19 d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan). 12. Performance securities, in amounts' to be determined by the Planning Manager to guarantee the installation of plantings and irrigation for all slope areas in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 13. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall apply for a Minor Exception, for approval by the Planning Manager, for a reduction in the amount of parking required per the Westside Specific Plan. 15. All slope landscaping and irrigation shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. In addition, all major and minor entry features and monumentation and the corner landscape and monumentation features shall be included on the plans. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan). 17. No building permit shall be issued for any building traversing a parcel line. 18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid. 19. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 20. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. R:\STAFFRF~392PA97.PCI 12/10/9'7 klb 20 21. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 22. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 23. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 24. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning ." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 25. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the maintenance of plantings for one year, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 26. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 27. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 28. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 29. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California R:\STAYFRFI~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 ~ 2 1 Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 30. Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 31. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 32. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 33. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1994). 34. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 35. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 36. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 37. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 38. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. 39. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 40. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 41. Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 42. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturers engineer are required for plan review submittal. 43. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. FIRE DEPARTMENT 44. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy and use and Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 45. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2,500 R:\STAFFRPT~92PA~7.PC1 12/10/97 m 22 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 903.2, Appendix Ill.A). The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-I. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 %" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B). If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (UFC. 8704.2 and 902.2.2). Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 70,000 lbs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 70,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (UFC sec 902 and Ord. 95-15). Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6)inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord. 95-15). Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4). Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3). R:\STAFFRPT~9'2PAF7.PC1 12/10/ff7 klb 23 54. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15). 55. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system(s) in the following buildings: B, C, D, F-l, F-2, F-3, G, I and J. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15). 56. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system(s) monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10). 57. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (UFC 902.4). 58. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4). 59. Provide a four-hour area separation wall without any penetrations or openings with a parapet as required by the Uniform Fire Code Appendix Ilia Sec 4, to limit separate fire areas, between building F-1 (Diner) and building F-2 (Celebrity Theater). 60. Building F-1 is over the allowable square footage for a type VN construction, provide an two hour area separation wall as required by the Uniform Building Code for allowable floor area. 61. Building F-3 (Honky-Tonk Music Theater) and building F-2 (Celebrity Theater) provide a four hour area separation wall as required by the Uniform Building Code for the separation mixed types of construction. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. R:\STAFFRFF~92PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb 24 General Requirements 62. A Grading Permit for rough and/or precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 63. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 64. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 65. All roadway, slope and utility easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 66. 67. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18 months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. a. Western Bypass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) from the intersection of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. bo Vincent Moraga Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension to south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor and restriping of the existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road to accommodate the proposed improvements. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. C. In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive "T" intersection configuration with Vincent Moraga Drive. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. R:\$TA~FIq~PT~392PA97.PC1 12/10/97 klb 2 5 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. d. First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension from Pujol Street west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. e. Affect the full improvements of the Main Street extension from Pujol Street west to the project site's proposed escalators for the pedestrian connection. f. Storm drain facilities within the road right-of-way. g. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). h. Erosion control and slope protection. i. Sewer and domestic water systems located within the road right-of-way. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The impact of the site to any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and to any adjacent floodways and necessary protection mitigation measures shall be identified. Adequacy of capacity of R:\$TAFFRPT~92PA97.PCI 12/10/97 klb 26 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. existing and proposed downstream drainage facilities shall be verified. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecula Fire Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Cable TV Franchise Caltrans Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company' Southern California Gas Company Fish & Game Army Corps of Engineers The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PCI 12/10197 klb 27 81. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed "Western bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive" in accordance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 82. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 83. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 84. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A, 208, and 401 (curb and sidewalk). c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. 85. Private roads MUST be designed by the engineer of record, reviewed, and approved by the Department of Public Works to meet City Public Road Standards or otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. This should include but may not be limited to: R:\STAFNRPT~92PA9~.PCI 12/10/97 klb 28 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. a. Minimum paved road widths of 32 feet within adequate right-of-ways or easements. b, Knuckles being required at 900 'bends' in the road. c. Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards. d. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. e. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required. f. 90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. g. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°). Concentrated on-site runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public Works. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following Engineering conditions: a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense. b. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PC1 12110197 !db 29 as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. C. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. d. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. e. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. All parkways, open areas, on-site slopes and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. ii. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 93. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 94. The Developer shall complete the following infrastructure improvements prior to issuance of any occupancy: Western By_pass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed from the intersection of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). R:\STAFFRPT~392PA97.PC1 12110197 ~ 30 Vincent Moraoa Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) shall be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate the proposed improvements. In relation to the above item, Ridoe Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to -- form) a "T" intersection with Vincent' Moraga Drive. First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from Pujol Street shall be extended west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. A traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates that the First Street/Western Bvoass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is recommended, therefore, - - that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise scheduling of this installation by the Developer. Moreover, when constructed this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the traffic signal proposed at the Front Street/State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection. A traffic signal at the First Street/Western Bypass Corridor intersection and interconnection with the traffic signal proposed at the Front Street/State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection. The applicant shall enter into an Agreement and post securities for the construction of interim improvements to the Rancho California Road/Interstate 1 5 (I-1 5) interchange as follows: At the Rancho California Road/I-15 northbound on ramps, on the westbound intersection approach, widen and/or re-stripe Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual) separate left turn lane at the 1-15 south on ramp, one through lane, one optional through right turn lane and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right turning traffic onto the 1-15 north on ramp, widening and/or re-striping may be required just north of Rancho California Road. These two lanes should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of 1-15 north. Similar widening and/or restriping shall be provided on the eastbound intersection approach at the Rancho California Road/I-15 south ramps. The agreement shall require that construction of the interim improvements commence within twenty-four (24) months of issuance of any grading permit. Negotiable securities in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and an amount acceptable to the City Engineer shall be provided by the applicant guaranteeing the faithful performance of this obligation. Should the City proceed with construction of the ultimate improvements for the interchange ahead of the applicant, then the applicant shall contribute to the City's improvement project an amount equal to the cost of the interim improvements. Applicant shall contribute their share within thirty (30) days of the City's award of the construction contract for the ultimate improvements. The applicant's contribution to the construction of the ultimate improvements shall relieve the R:\gTAFFRFT~92PAg?.PCI 12110/97 klb 31 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. applicant from all responsibility regarding the timing for completion of the improvements at !-15 and Rancho California Road. The Developer shall affect construction of full improvements of the Main Street extension from Pujol Street west to the project site's proposed escalators for the pedestrian connection. Sufficient parking for a local transit system shall be provided to satisfy the parking demands of the project. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City Standards and in compliance with the site traffic impact analyses, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping shall be installed per the approved traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping plan, respectively. The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRPT~2PA~7.PCI 12/10/97 klb 32 - OTHER AGENCIES 105. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated November 19, 1997, a copy of which is attached. 106. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 19, 1997, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Applicant Name R:\STAFFRFI~92PA97.PC1 12/10/9'/klb 33 County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: November 19, 1997 TO: FROM RE: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Matthew Fagan ~/~GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO PA97-0392 1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No PA97-0392 and has no objections. 2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE · a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. GD:cr (909) 285-8980 hncho Water Board of Directors: Michael R. McMiilan P,'es~dent Csaba F. Ko St. \hoe Pre~dent Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman Doug Kulberg · Jeffrey !,. MinkJet George M. Woods ()fficers: John F. Hennigar General Manager Phillip L. Forbes Director of Finance- Treasurer E. P. "Bob" Lemons D~rector of Enloneermg Kenneth C. Dealy l)irector ,)f Operat runs & Maintenance Perry R. Louck ~ 'entrelief Linda M. Fregoso District Sec'retary; Administratwe Services Manager C. Michael Cowerr Best Best & Krieger LLP General C,)unsel November 19, 1997 Mr. Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMENT CENTER APNS 940-310-013, 940-320-001, AND 940-320-002 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 Dear Mr. Fagan: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements (including all in-tract facilities) between RCWD and the property owner. It may be necessary for the property owner to extend existing District water facilities to provide domestic/commercial and fire protection services to this development. Owner should contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In response to your request, RCWD has provided the attached information. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 97/SB:eb300/F012c/FCF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician Attachment Rancho California Water District .12135 Winchest0r Roa(I ° P-qt Office Box 9017 * Temecula, C,dilbrnm 92589-9017 ° ff109~ fi76-,111~1 * FAX ~909) 678-0615 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PARKING STUDY UPDATE LETTER R:\STAFFRPT~92PA97.PC1 12110/97 klb ~4 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS * PLANNERS 2300 E. KATELLA AVE. · SUITE 275 , ANAHEIM, CA 92806-6047 * (714) 978-8110 o FAX (714) 978-1109 November 4, 1997 Zev Buffman President Temecula Entertainment 41934 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE* Westside Specific Plan/Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex Phase II Parking Study Update Letter Dear Mr. Buffman: In response to the City of Temecula Planning Department's letter dated October 16, 1997, Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) has reviewed the current plans for Phase II of the Old Town Entertainment Center relative to on-site parking needs. Specifically, this parking study update includes: 1. An evaluation of daily parking demand for each land use component included in the project; 2. An assessment of parking utilization characteristics and parking accumulation for individual components of the project; o An analysis of shared parking potential and maximum parking accumulation for the project based on the composite paxking utilization characteristics of all land use components combined; and . A comparison of the assessed maximum parking accumulation for the project with both the Westside Specific Plan parking requirement and the parking provisions per the current Phase II project plans. ~, NY · ANAHEIM, CA · ATLANTA, GA · cAIr'~o, EGYPT o CHARLESTON. SC · COLUIVI~IA. SC. COLU~, OH · 'DES MOINES, {A · FALLS CHLg",~H, VA. HONG KCNG HOUSTON, TX · KNOXVILLE, TN ,. LEXINGTON, KY · LONDON, ENGLAND * MILWAUKEE, WI o NEW HAVEN, CT . OAKLAND, CA · OI~ANDO, R. · PlT'TSt~J~. PA · I'~ALEIGH, NC RICHMOND. VA. r'~KDSELLE, IL · SAN FRANCISCO. CA. SAN JOSE, CA · SINGAPORE · TALLa. HASSEE, FL. TAMPA, FL ~ Tor',K~NTO. CANADA ~ WASHINGTON, DC EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 2 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES WSA's parking study update was initiated with a review of the previous parking study prepared for the project by KAKU Associates in October, 1996. The analysis methodologies applied in this update study are consistent with the approach used in the KAKU study. In order to simplify the parking study analysis and City staff's review of the study findings, the WSA analysis is focused on the "peak activity season" conditions, as previously identified in the KAKU study. The basic steps involved in the parking study update included: I. Definition of the peak attendance season for the Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex; 2. Definition of facility capacities and typical peak occupancy factors; 3. Estimation of daily attendance and vehicle trip projections; 4. Facility operating assumptions; 5. Estimation of peak parking demand and parking accumulation by individual project land use component; 6. Estimation of shared parking, peak cumulative parking demand and maximum parking accumulation for the entire project; and 7. Assessment of the adequacy of current project parking provisions. The following sections document the findings of each step of the parking analysis. Peak Attendance Season In the KAKU study, peak attendance for the Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex was determined to occur during the summer season. For the current Phase II project analysis, two peak season scenarios are evaluated: Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 3 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES peak season weekday - which is represemed by a Friday with single performances occurring in each of the four major venues (e.g. Wild West Arena, Celebrity Theater, and Western Dinner Theater, and Studio Theater). peak season weekend - which is represented by a Saturday with single performances occurring in the Arena, Celebrity Theater, and Western Dinner Theater and two performances in the. Studio Theater. It is estimated that each of these peak activity scenarios could occur between 15 and 20 times per year. Facility Capacities and Typical Peak Occupancies Current project land use, as defined by Temecula entertainment, is summarized in Table 1. It should be noted that the recent traffic study update included a facility, referred to as the "Palace Theater." This facility is no longer being considered as part of the project. The proposed capacity and/or size of each project land use component is given in Table 1. : It is important to note that the Hotel is assumed to provide separate parking for hotel guests. Parking demand for hotel guests is therefore not included in this analysis of on-site parking needs. Typical peak season occupancies of the four principal venues were identified in the KAKU study based on market studies of similar projects. WSA has applied the same peak season occupancy factors in the parking analysis for all of the facilities except the Wild West Arena. For purposes of adding additional conservatism to the parking analysis, WSA has used a higher typical peak season occupancy for the Wild West Arena. For the weekday scenario, the occupancy factor has been increased from 70 percent to 75 percent. For the Weekend scenario the occupancy factor has been increased from 70 percent to 85 percent. For both scenarios, the Celebrity Theater and the Studio Theater are assumed to have a peak season occupancy factor of 90 percent. The Western Music Dinner Theater is assumed to have an occupancy factor of 95 percent for both scenarios. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 4 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES It should be noted that in the project traffic study, some of the land uses within the project were assessed to be incidental or passive in nature and are not expected to contribute significantly to the primary attraction of vehicle trips to the project. These include the chapel, Roy Rogers Experience/Museum (and down-sized virtual reality venue), and informal/incidental entertainment components of the dining and retail core. As described to us, the chapel located on the central courtyard portion of the project site, would serve as an informal place of rest and self-reflection/meditation for visitors. The Roy Rogers Experience/museum and virtual reality fide as well as other general entertainment components of the project are considered as a secondary-level attractions available to visitors attending the primary events/shows, dining establishments and retail shopping attractions. Based on similar entertainment-oriented projects, these secondary-level uses become incidental to the primary attractions. Traffic generation for these uses is considered insignificant relative to traffic generation for the primary attractions. Daily Attendance and Vehicle Trip Projections Daily attendance for the four principal facilities is essentially the product of the seating capacity, number of daily shows and typical occupancy factor. A summary of the daily calculated daily attendance for these facilities is given in Table 2. Daily visitation estimates for the Food and Wine Court and Dining Establishment are based on average turnover of the available seating. For the weekday scenario, seating turnover is conservatively estimated to average 6 times per seat. For the weekend scenario, a higher average seating turnover rate of 8 times per seat has been used for the Food and Wine Court and 7 times per seat for the Dining Establishment. The resulting peak attendance projections are given in Table 2. Daily visitation for the retail component of the project is based on standard Institute of Transportation Engineers trip rates for specialty commercial. These trip rates are expressed in one-way vehicle trips per thousand square feet of floor area. The resultant number of gross one-way vehicle trips is given in Table 2. Vehicle trip demand is defined in terms of one-way trips for use in the analysis of vehicle arrival and departure rates and the resulting parking accumulation. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 5 Daily attendance for the administrative and back-of-house functions of the project are based on the estimated number of employees required to staff activities involved in each of the event scenarios. Peak staffing requirements are estimated by Temecula Entertainment to be 325 employees for the weekday scenario and 500 employees for the weekend scenario. Daily one-way vehicle trips are derived from person attendance/visitation estimates based on the average vehicle occupancy rates and vehicle mode of arrival (e.g. bus or private automobile). The vehicle mode of arrival for patrons is conservatively estimated to be only 5 percent by bus and 95 percent by auto. All employees are assumed to arrive by auto. Average vehicle occupancy for patrons arriving by auto, is estimated to be 3 passengers per vehicle. Autos used by employees, are assumed to have an average vehicle occupancy of 1.2 passengers per vehicle. Buses transporting patrons to the project are assumed to have an average occupancy of 25 passengers per vehicle. This occupancy rate, which is lower than the standard 30 passengers per vehicle rate offered by most tour/chartered buses, recognizes that some micro-bus type vehicles may be used. In the case of the Food and Wine Court, Dining Establishment, and Retail components of the project, the project Traffic Study included a conservative estimate that 50 percent of the trips generated by these uses would actually originate from within the project or Old Town. In most similar projects, these uses function as ammenities to visitors of the primary event venues and rarely attract significant trips on an individual basis. The parking analysis conservatively assumes that 50 percent of estimated trip attractions for the Food and Wine Court and Retail components would be satisfied from outside the project. In the case of the Dining Establishment, the parking analysis includes a more conservative external trip estimate of 80 percent for the weekday scenario, and 60 percent for the weekend scenario. Project-related vehicle parking demand will occur both on-site and off-site (e.g. in Old Town) according to the estimated traffic approach distribution. The revised traffic study for the project estimated that 92 percent of the traffic would access the immediate project site while 8 percent would enter Old Town and walk onto the project site. All bus parking is assumed to occur on-site. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 6 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES The final adjustment to daily vehicle trips for the major event facilities which are made to on- site parking areas is a reduction due to trips which would originate from the on-site hotel. The reduction assumes 80 percent occupancy of the hotel and 75 percent of the occupied hotel room guests attending one of the scheduled events. Table 2 documents the derivation of daily vehicle demand estimates and the number of vehicles estimated to park on-site .and in Old Town. Table 3 provides a summary of the on-site and Old Town daily parking demand. Facility Operating Assumptions WSA reviewed event schedules and duration of events at the major venues with Temecula Entertainment. These schedules, which we understand would be controlled by the project operator/manager, have a direct affect on the peak parking demand and maximum parking accumulation periods. Current event/show programming for the project generally schedule most peak season weekday events and shows commencing at 7:00 p.m. (Studio Theater) and 7:30 p.m. (Arena, Celebrity Theater and Western Dinner Theater). For the peak season weekend scenario, the events/shows would be scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. (Studio Theater), 3:00 p.m. (Western Dinner Theater), and 3:30 p.m. (Arena and Celebrity Theater). The duration of shows/events varies from 2 hours (Studio Theater and Western Dinner Theater) to 3 hours (Celebrity Theater). Arena shows would typically be 2 1/2 hours in duration. It is assumed that the'project would be open to visitors generally between 9:00 a.m. and approximately 11:00 p.m. Staff may be on-site before and after the normal hours for the general public. Peak Parking Demand and Maximum Parking Accumulation Vehicle trips generated by each land use component on a daily basis were distributed throughout the day based on the expected pattern of vehicle arrivals and departures. Note that this represents the distribution of vehicle trips which originate from and depart to locations off- site and outside the Old Town area. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 7 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Table 4a provides a summary of the peak season weekday scenario distribution of vehicle arrivals at the project site for each individual land use component. The estimated distribution of departing vehicles for the weekday scenario, is provided in Table 4b. Similar vehicle arrival and departure schedules are provided in Tables 5a and 5b respectively, for the peak season weekend scenario. Periods of peak parking. demand can be determined from Tables 4a and 5a for each project land use component and for the project as a whole. The analysis indicates that peak parking demand for the project occurs when parking demand for the Arena is at its peak. On the peak season weekday, peak parking demand for the project occurs between 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. when 634 vehicles arrive on-site. For the peak season weekend scenario, peak parking demand occurs between 3:00 and 3:00 p.m. when 668 vehicles arrive on-site. Peak departure times for the project are at 10:30 to 11:00 p.m. for the weekday and 6:30 to 7:00 p.m. for the weekend. At these times, between 624 and 694 vehicles depart from the site. Parking accumulation can be estimated by comparing the number of vehicle arrivals and departures for each 30-minute analysis period. Early in the day, vehicle arrivals are higher than vehicle departures. During this period, the number of parked cars increases or accumulate. The difference in arrivals and departures for any given period represents the net number of vehicles which either add to the number of vehicles parked on-site or reduce the number of vehicles on-site. Towards the end of the day, vehicle .departures are higher than vehicle arrivals. During this period, the number of cars parked diminishes. Tables 6 and 7 present summaries of on-site parking accumulation for the peak season weekday and weekend scenarios respectively. The accumulation of parked vehicles is provided in Tables 6 and 7 for the individual project land use components as well as for the entire project. The degree to which the maximum parking accumulation times are offset for the individual project land use components, represents the opportunity for shared parking. While, parking accumulation for the major venues will be peaking at approximately the same time, the more evenly distributed parking accumulation for the Food and Wine Court and Retail allow for some shared parking to occur. Additionally, if parking accumulation for individual uses show low peaking characteristics, then the parking supply will be utilized more efficiently. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 8 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES The parking accumulation analysis shows that for the peak season weekday scenario, maximum parking accumulation would occur between 7:30 and 8:30 p.m., when 1,971 vehicles would be parked on-site. For the peak season weekend scenario, maximum accumulation is estimated to occur between 3:30 and 4:00 p.m., when a maximum total of 2,351 vehicles would be parked on-site. Parking Needs Assessment The current site plan for Phase II provides a total of 2,583 parking spaces while the Specific Plan or City code requirement indicates a need for 2,755 parking spaces. Based on the findings of the parking demand and parking accumulation analysis, the current site plan provides 232 parking spaces (9.9 percent) above the 2,351 parking spaces estimated for maximum peak season weekend parking accumulation. For the peak season weekday condition, the currently planned parking supply offers 612 parking spaces (31.1 percent) in excess of the 1,971 required parking spaces. The analysis findings indicate that the current plan provided adequate parking for land uses proposed for project Phase II. The excess parking will help to insure that even under unusually hilda attendance conditions for the planned events, there will be sufficient on-site parking. If expansion of the currently planned seating capacity for the Arena is proposed in the future, parking needs should be re-assessed based on actual on-site parking conditions experienced once the project is implemented. Based on the current parking analysis, the proposed addition of 1,200 seats to the arena would increase the on-site weekday and weekend parking accumulation by 264 and 299 vehicles respectively. Additional on-site parking could be made available to project patrons if a portion of the project employees were to be provided off-site remote parking with shuttle service. Based on discussions with Temecula Entertainment, the minimum administrative/VIP parking necessary on-site is approximately 80 spaces. If on-site employee parking were limited to 80 spaces, approximately 100 additional weekday parking spaces and 230 additional weekend spaces would be opened up for patron use. Zev Buffman November 4, 1997 Page 9 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Should you have any questions concerning our findings, please contact me (714) 978-8110. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Robert A. Davis Principal Transportation Planner RAD:rad Attachments UJ o o o ILl o o o o o o o 0 o E ~, '~"' ::; E il i[ o o o o o o ooooo o o z 0 z Table 2 Daily Vehicle Demand Estimate Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex Project Land Use Component Wild West Arena: Seating Capacity Shows Per Day Typical Peak Occupancy Typical Peak Attendance Person Trips By Bus (5%) Person Tdps By Auto (95%) Vehicle Trips By Bus (25 persons per vehicle) Vehicle Trips By Auto (3 persons per vehicle) Autos Parked in Old Town (8%) Autos Parked On-Site (92%) Buses Parked On-Site (100%) Total Vehicle Parked On-Site Estimated Vehicles Parked At Hotel Net Vehicle Parking Demand Celebrity Theater: Seating Capacity Shows Per Day Typical Peak Occupancy Typical Peak Attendance Person Tdps By Bus (5%) Person Trips By Auto (95%) Vehicle Trips By Bus (25 persons per vehicle) Vehicle Trips By Auto (3 persons per vehicle) Autos Parked in Old Town (8%) Autos Parked On-Site (92%) Buses Parked On-Site (100%) Total Vehicle Parked On-Site Estimated Vehicles Parked At Hotel Net Vehicle Parking Demand Studio Theater. Seating Capacity Shows Per Day Typical Peak Occupancy Typical Peak Attendance Person Trips By Bus (5%) Person Trips By Auto (95%) Vehicle Trips By Bus (25 persons per vehicle) Vehicle Tdps By Auto (3 persons per vehicle) Autos Parked in Old Town (8%) Autos Parked On-Site (92%) Buses Parked On-Site (100%) Total Vehicle Parked On-Site Estimated Vehicles Parked At Hotel Net Vehicle Parking Demand Western Music Dinner Theater: Seating Capacity Shows Per Day Typical Peak Occupancy Typical Peak Attendance Person Trips By Bus (5%) Person Trips By Auto (95%) Vehicle Trips By Bus (25 persons par vehicle) Vehicle Trips By Auto (3 persons per vehicle) Autos Parked in Old Town (8%) Autos Parked On-Site (92%) Buses Parked On-Site (100%) Total Vehicle Parked On-Site Estimated Vehicles Parked At Hotel Net Vehicle On-Site Parking Demand Event Weekday 4,800 1 75% 3,600 180 3,420 8 1,140 91 1,049 8 1,057 85 972 2,200 1 9O% 1,980 99 1,881 4 627 $0 577 4 581 47 534 3OO 1 9O% 270 14 257 1 86 7 79 1 8O 7 73 5OO 1 95% 475 24 451 1 151 12 139 1 140 tl 129 Event Weekend 4,800 1 85% 4,080 204 3,876 9 1,292 103 1.189 9 1,198 85 1,113 2.200 1 90% 1,980 99 1,881 4 627 50 577 4 581 47 534 3OO 2 90% 540 27 513 2 171 14 157 2 159 14 t45 5OO 1 95% 475 24 451 1 151 12 139 1 140 11 129 Table 2 (Cont.) Daily Vehicle Demand Estimate Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex Proiect Land Use Component Food and Wine Court: Seating Capacity Typical Peak Occupancy Average Seating Turnover Typical Peak Attendance Gross Vehicle Trips (3 persons per vehicle) Internal trip Adjustment (reduction) Net Extemal Trips Vehicles Parked in Old Town (8%) Vehicles Parked On-Site (92%) Event Weekday 250 95% 6 1425 475 5o% 238 19 219 EventWeekend 250 95% 8 1900 634 50% 317 25 292 Dining Establishment Seating Capacity Typical Peak Oc~cupancy Average Seating Tumover Typical Peak Attendance Gross Vehicle Trips (3 persons per vehicle) Internal trip Adjustment (reduction) Net External Trips Vehicles Parked in Old Town (8%) Vehicles Parked On-Site (92%) 85 90% 6 459 153 20% 122 112 85 9O% 7 536 179 4O% 107 9 98 Retail: Floor Area (square feet) Vehicle Trip Rate (one-way trips per 1,000 square feet) Gross Vehicle Tdp (one-way) Internal Trip Adjustment (reduction) Net External trips Vehicles Parked in Old Town (8%) Vehicles Parked On-Site (92%) 56,000 15 84O 50% 420 34 386 56,000 20 1,120 50% 56O 45 515 Administration/Back Of House: Assumed Staff/VIP Vehicle Trips (1.2 persons per vehicle) Vehicle Parked On-Site 325 271 27t 500 417 417 > o [~ '~ E o~ o~ ~0o __ OlJJ °~ · ~11tllllltlllltlllltlltl ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ADOPTED ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED EIR FOR THE OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT R:\STAFFRPT~2PA~/.PC1 12/10/~710b 3 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Recommendation for Adopting an Addendum ............................. 15 Initial Environmental Study Checklist for Addendum ....................... 16 Determination Evaluation of Addendum Issues Traffic Study .................................................. 17 Traffic Study dated August 11, 1997 Letter from WSA dated August 28, 1997 Letter from WSA dated September 21, 1997 Letter from WSA dated October 1, 1997 Visual Simulations .............................................. 18 R:\STAFFRPT~298PA97.PCI 10/2/97 vgw '1 4 RECOMMENDATION FOR ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM R:\STAFFRPT~9gPA97.PCI 9/26/97 mf I 5 Recommendation for Adopting an Addendum In 1995 the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Redevelopment Project, including the Westside Specific Plan (WSP) and certified a Final E[R as the appropriate CEQA determination for the project. The project envisioned about 12-14 entertainment venues as part of a western themed entertainment complex and support commercial and residential uses that would be constructed in two phases. Substantial infrastructure improvements were also required to support the project, including construction of several bridges, a major portion of the Western By-pass road, and improvements to interchanges between major local roads and Interstate 15. Over the past two years, the project proponent, Temecula Entertainment Ventures, Inc. (TEVI), has evolved the design of the project from its original design concept with approximately 1,045,500 square feet (ft2) of commercial facilities to a current design concept with approximately 459,700 It:. Along with this reduction in the number of initial facilities that are proposed to be constructed, the TEVI proposes to focus all initial development in the WSP area. Because of these changes, the City decided to reevaluate the potential environmental effects of the current design concept which is being reviewed for approval as a Development Plan. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Article 11) provide that an agency shall prepare an Addendum to a certified EIR when some changes or additions are necessary and where no substantial changes occur in the project. Section 15164 (a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states: "The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent Ei'P, have occurred." To ascertain whether the conditions in 15162 apply to the current design concept for the proposed project, the city prepared an Initial Study to evaluate each environmental issue and substantiate the need for either a subsequent EIR or an Addendum to the certified EIR. The attached Initial Study indicates that for all environmental issues, the physical changes of the project are either reduced compared to the project approved in 1995, or are directly comparable to the impact forecasts contained in the certified EIR. Two technical study updates, for traffic and aesthetic impacts, were prepared to verify the conclusions presented in the attached Initial Study. Based on these findings, the City intends to adopt this Addendum to the certified Final EI'R for the Old Town Redevelopment Project as the appropriate CEQA determination for the Development Plan and related project approvals (such as the grading plan) currently before the City. The Addendum consists of this recommendation and sunm~ary of findings; the Initial Study substantiating the findings; the technical data and materials prepared in support of this environmental finding; and the various engineering and technical reports submitted in fulfillment of conditions of approval and mitigation measures established as part of the original decision and certified EIR. If the Development Plan and related implementation plans are approved, the City will file a Notice of Determination for the Addendum following the final hearing on this matter. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY CHECKLIST FOR ADDENDUM R:\STAFFRPT~295PAg'7.PCI 10/2/97 vgw 1 6 . o . . . . CITY OF TEMECULA Environmental Checklist for Addendum Project Title: Old Town Temecula Entertainment Complex Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number: Matthew Fagan, (909) 694-6400 Project Location: The Westside Specific Plan area encompasses approximately i53.1 acres south and west of Pujol Street in the City of Temecula. The mapped location of the proposed project areas can be found on the Murrieta and Temecula 7.5' topographic maps published by the U.S. Geological Survey, at Latitude 33° 28' North and Longitude 1170 09' West. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: TEVI, 41934 Main Street, Temecula 92590 General Plan Designation: Westside Specific Plan Zoning: Westside Specific Plan Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project and any secondary, support or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The original project consisted of a conceptual description of the facilities and their proposed activity patterns. The Final EIR, Chapter 3, contains the detailed descriptions of the proposed facilities and activities. The following summary is based on Chapter 3 of the Final EIR and the project summary contained in the adopted Statement of Overriding' considerations. The facilities consist of: .a. Cabaret Theaters: Two cabaret theaters are proposed to be located in the OTSP core area. Both cabaret theaters would be constructed during Phase I of the project. One cabaret is proposed to contain about 27,000 square feet (ft2) and 40 feet high and the second theater is proposed to contain about 45,000 ft2. These cabarets are designed to entertain a maximum of about 600 and 900 people per event, respectively. Each show is expected to last for approximately two hours and it is initially anticipated that the theater will hold 13 shows per week. Western Saloons: Two saloons are proposed to be located in the OSTP core area. Both saloons would be constructed during Phase 1 of the project and each saloon is proposed to contain approximately 10,000 ft2 in a one-two story structure. Each saloon will be designed to entertain approximately 350 persons, 250 at tables and about 100 at or adjacent to the bar. A small stage will 'be provided for typical bar entertainment, such as dancing girls. Staged bar fights, shootouts and other entertainment will be provided. The saloons will operate every day of the week. R:'drORMS\CEQA. 1ES 9/22/97 10b .e. 8.g. Opera House: An opera house is proposed to be located in the OTSP. It would be constructed during Phase I of the project. The opera house is proposed to be a two story structure with the proscenium approximately 50 feet high. The opera house is expected to encompass 85,000 t~2 of space with a building footprint of approximately 75,0002. Estimated seating capacity will be 1,400 persons on the first floor and 800 seats in the balcony. A television and radio studio will occupy approximately 2,500 f~2 within or adjacent to the opera house. It is anticipated that the opera house will have 13 performances per week. Showboat: A western showboat facility with a showroom is proposed to be located in the OTSP core area. This facility would be implemented during Phase 2 of the project when adequate demand for additional entertainment space justifies its construction. The showboat will be a two-story structure, with the smokestacks approximately 30 feet high. It is proposed to be approximately 21,000 t52 and it would have the capacity to entertain an estimated 600 persons per event, seven days per week. Wild West Arena: A 4,800 seat tent designed wild west arena that will be similar to Buffalo Bill's touting western tent show is proposed to be located just west of OTSP core area within the Westside Specific Plan area. It would be constructed during Phase I of the project. This is an outdoor/indoor facility that will operate all year but have a 16 week summer "high" season. The arena will encompass approximately 175,000 square feet and the tent poles will raise the height of the facility to approximately 85-90 feet above the ground surface. During the 36 week regular season two shows per week are expected to be performed, primarily on the weekends. During the arena high season it is estimated that several shows will be performed per day, primarily on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. V. ktual Reality Pavilion(s): Three virtual reality pavilions with two theaters in each are proposed for development within the OTSP. One pavilion with two theaters will be constructed as part of Phase 1 of the project. The other two pavilions will be implemented as part of Phase 2 when sufficient demand justifies their construction. The theaters will be constructed in the Plan core area. Each theater will seat about 50 persons. Maximum occupancy of these two-story structures (height about 25-30 feet) is estimated to be about 200 persons. Each pavilion will encompass about 19,000 ~2 for a total of-57,000 15-' if all three pavilions are implemented. Each show requires about five to six minutes with the theater portion running about three to four minutes. Performances would be continuous after the facility opens each day. "Quick Draw" Competition Area: In the Old Town core area a plaza or town square will be constructed which is proposed to contain a quick draw competition area. This facility will be constructed as part of Phase 1 and is proposed to encompass approximately 8,000 152 outdoors in or adjacent to the plaza. This will be a westernized "police academy" type of facility where an individual will walk through an outdoor maze of targets. Ten people can participate in each five minute tnp and scores will be posted on a large electronic board. Hotel: One major hotel is proposed for construction in the vicinity of the wild west arena within the Westside Specific Plan. The initial configuration of the hotel is proposed to be four stories in height and provide a total of 350 rooms. It is proposed to be constructed during Phase 1 of the project. A 5.7 acre pad will be provided for this facility and it is proposed to contain approximately 300,000 ft2 of building space. The hotel may be expanded with 150 additional rooms during Phase 2 if sufficient demand justifies such an expansion. The hotel is proposed to include approximately 50,000 .152 of related retail space when constructed in Phase I and the range of retail uses includes restaurants, service commercial uses, and retail commercial uses. An additional 50,000 ft: of retail space may be constructed during Phase 2 if demand for the commercial capacity is sufficient. R:WOKM$\CEQA.IE$ 9/2~97 klb 2 8.i. Retail Commercial: The City anticipates 50,000 to 100,000 ft2 of the retail commercial area identified in the OTSP will ultimately be developed in Old Town to support the entertainment facilities/activities. It is estimated that 30,000 ft2 will be developed during Phase I as a component of this project. No specific locations have been selected for these retail activities. Vi$itor~ Center/Ticket Office: One or more visitors centers/ticket office facilities will be located in the downtown area for ticket purchases and to provide information. This facility/facilities may encompass up to 5,500 ~2 of area. It will be open during normal business hours and during evenings when events are scheduled at the entertainment complex. 8.k. Administrative Space: An additional 20,000 square feet of space for administrative offices and back- of-house areas may be constructed to support the project. Some of this space may be located within the opera house facility and others on the second floor of other structures or within independent structures. As originally envisioned, the Temecula entertainment venue was to develop simultaneously in the Old Town portion of the City and within the Westside Specific Plan area located northeast of the Western Bypass corridor, southwest of Old Town. These two development areas (Old Town and Westside Specific Plan) were approved for a mixture of commercial entertainment facilities, hotels, support (ancillary) facilities, and residential uses by the City in 1995, as outlined above. The actual construction of the entertainment venue has been delayed for a vahety of reasons, including delays due to legal challenges to the project and the efforts to justify funding of the extensive infrastructure that must be installed when the project is developed. A few of the major infrastructure components include: the Western By-pass and First Street bridges over Mumeta Creek; installation of the required paved section of the Westem By-pass from the Front Street/Highway 79 South/Interstate 15 interchange to Vincent Moraga Drive; and all of the water, sewer, and other utility infrastructure systems required to support the facilities permitted by the Westside Specific Plan. In order to obtain the significant funding commitments required to construct the entertainment venue in the City. in conformance with the City's 1995 approvals, the project has evolved from the original concept as outlined above, to a current concept that has been designed to be consistent with the Westside Specific Plan, yet reflect the fundamental project components that are necessary to attract the substantial funds required to build all facilities, including the extensive infrastructure required to support the project. As originally envisioned, the Temecula entertainment venue was to develop simultaneously in the Old Town portion of the City and within the Westside Specific Plan area located northeast of the Western Bypass corridor, southwest of Old Town. These two development areas (Old Town and Westside Specific Plan) were approved for a mixture of commercial entertainment facilities, hotels, support (ancillary) facilities, and residential uses by the City in 1995. A comparison of the original and proposed design components is presented below. Note that certain uses have been transferred from Old Town to Area "A" of the Westside Specific Plan (WSP) as "ancillary" uses to the hotel and wild west arena. This has been necessary. to support the costs of the required infrastructure improvements defined in the original approvals. It also overcomes the lack of economically viable sites in Old Town where no specific sites were shown in the original applications because of the difficulty of consolidating adequate building and parking areas. Keep in mind that Phase 1, as defined in the original certified EIR and summarized above, encompassed almost all of the proposed entertainment facilities. Phase 2 was proposed to consist of commercial and residential uses as required to support the overall success of the entertainment venue. Table I summarizes the square footage for each proposed entertainment venue facility and other facilities approved by the City. of Temecula, such as the hotel. The square footage of facilities as envisioned in the original design concept and the current design concept are presented below. Where a facility is not shown in the current design concept side of Table 1, it is being deferred to the future as discussed above. R:~FOItJvtS\CEQA. IES 9/2.2/97 idb 3 Table 1 · Original Design Concept Do Go d. e. g. Square Footage Summary of Entertainment Facilities h. Current Design Concept Cabaret Theatre (2) 27,000 ft;2/45,000 if2 Location: Old Town Cabaret Theater/Western Music Dinner Theatre (1) 20,000 if2 Location: ancillary to hotel in the WSP area Western Saloon (2) 10,000 if2 each Location: Old Town Western Saloon/Rockin Rodeo(l) 12,000 if2 Location: ancillary to hotel in the WSP area Opera House 75,000 t~2 building footprint Location: Old Town Opera House/Celebrity Auditorium 50,000 ft2 building footprint Location: ancillary to Hotel in the WSP area Showboat 21,000 ft2 Location: Old Town Showboat (deferred to future) No change at this time No change at this time Wild West Arena 175,000 ft2 , 85-90 feet height Location: WSP area Wild West Arena 105,000 ft2, 75 feet height Location WSP area Virtual Reality Pavilion (3) 19,000 if2, total 57,000 ft2 Location' Old Town Virtual Reality Experience 7,200 Location: WSP, a part of the Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Museum, ancillary to Wild West Arena "Quick Draw" Competition Area 8,000 fi2 Location: Old Town "Quick Draw" Competition Area (deferred to future) No change at this time No change at this time Hotel 300,000 f~2 initial; additional 100,000 ft2 for additional 150 rooms when justified in future Location: WSP area Hotel 125,000 if2, 275 rooms Location: WSP area Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Exhibition -~23,000 ft2, including Virtual Reality Experience Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena R:xJ:OP,.M$\CEQA.IES 9/2997 klb Temecula Wine & Food Exhibition 30,000 ft2 Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena ko Chapel 1,600 Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena Hotel Retail Commercial 50,000 ft2/50,000 ft2 Location: WSP area, ancillary to hotel Hotel Retail Commercial 69,600 f[2, kiosks, shops, restaurams Location: WSP area, ancillary to hotel m. Retail Commercial 50,000-100,000 ~2 Location: Old Town Deferred to the Future n. Visitor Center/Ticket Office (1 +) 5,500 ft2 Location: Old Town Visitor Center 2,500 ft2 Location: WSP area, ancillary to Wild West Arena O. Administrative Space 20,000 fi2 Location: open Administrative Space Same Location: WSP area, part of Arena or Theatre p, Festival Square 20,000 Location: Old Town Arena Plaza/Sons of the Pioneers Music Plaza Small gazebo stage/-500-1,000 fi2 Location: WSP area, ancillary to Wild West Arena Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) The Westside Specific Plan area has residential uses to the east and northeast, open space to the northwest, west, southwest and south, and residential uses to the southeast. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g. permits, financing approval or participation agreement.) Permits or other approvals may be required from the State Water Control Board, Department of Fish and Game, San Diego Regional Board, U.S. Corps of Engineers, Caltrans, Metropolitan Water District, Riverside County Flood Control, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. R:XFOP~tS\CEQA.rF$ 9/22/97 idb 5 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, revolving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] [ ] Population and Housing [x] [ ] Geologic Problems [ ] [ ] Water [] [x] Air Quality [ ] [ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] [ ] Biological Resources [ ] [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Hazards Noise Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [1 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but these effects 1) have been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) have been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. The evaluation m this Imtial Study, including updated traffic and visual impact analyses, constitute an Addendum to the Final EIR and the analysis in this Addendum indicates that none of the conditions in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines call for the preparation of a S~~t EIR ~~'~~ Dat?}/~ ~' P~t~d~n For R:~FORMS\CEQA. IES 9/2~97 kib ISSUES AND SUPPOP. TING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Signi~cant Potentially Unles~ Less Than Significant Mitigation Signific~t No Impact kn¢orpor~ted Impact Impact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? Ix] Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? [l [] Ix] c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? [] [] Ix] [] d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? [1 [1 [ I [xl Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including low-income or minority community)? [] [] [ ] Ix] Evaluation of Addendum II~sue$; Land use was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was, therefore, evaluated in the EIR. All land use impacts, including land use conflicts and consistency with existing General Plan land use designations, are mitigable to a nonsignificant level after application of mitigation. Land uses within Area A remain consistent with the original uses as outlined below. A review of the proposed current design concept indicates that the same mitigation will ensure that all land use impacts are mitigated to a nonsignificant level. The designation of the open space area remains as originally envisioned (all property. west of the Western By-pass Road), and other potential land use conflicts are reduced even further than envisioned in the EIR by inclusion of the additional noise attenuation in the design. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented and land use impacts will be reduced to a nonsignificant level. Consistency issues are further addressed in the following evaluation. As originally envisioned, the Temecuia entertainment venue was to develop simultaneously in the Old Town portion of the City and willfin the Westside Specific Plan area located northeast of the Western Bypass corridor, southwest of Old Town. These two development areas (Old Town and Westside Specific Plan) were approved for a mixture of conunercial entertaimnent facilities, hotels, support (ancillary) facilities, and residential uses by the City in 1995. As the City is aware, the actual construction of the entertainment venue has been delayed for a variety of reasons, including delays due to legal challenges to the project and the efforts to justify funding of the extensive infrastructure that must be installed when the project is developed. In order to obtain the significant funding commitments required to construct d~e entertainment venue in the City in conformance with the City's 1995 approvals, the project has evolved from the original concept as outlined in Attachment A, to a current concept that has been designed to be consistent with the Westside Specific Plan, yet reflect the fundamental project components that are necessary to attract the substantial funds required to build all facilities, including the extensive infrastructure required to support the project. To demonstrate consistent3, of the current design concept for the entertainment venue with the original approvals, particularly the Westside Specific Plan, a comparison of the original and proposed design components is presented below. Note that certain uses have been transferred from Old Town to Area "A" of the Westside Specific Plan (WSP) as "ancillary" uses to the hotel and wild west arena. This has been necessary. to support the costs of the required infrastructure improvements defined in the original approvals. As is demonstrated below, the proposed conceptual design now being presented to file City is fully consistent with the total scope of facilities envisioned and approved in the project original approvals, and even though the current focus has shifted from Old Town to the WSP area, R:LFOIU~IS\CEQA. IES 9/2~97 Idb 7 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Signi~c~nt PotcntiaUy Unle~ ~ Th~n $ignRicant Mitigation Significant No · Impact Incorporated Impact Impact additional facilities remain to be sited in Old Town as demand for additional entertainment facilities evolves in the future. Table 1, in the project description, summarizes the square footage for each proposed entertainment venue facility and other facilities approved by the City of Temecula, such as the hotel. The square footage of facilities as envisioned in the original design concept and the current design concept are presented below. Where a facility is not shown in file current design concept side of Table 1, it is being deferred to the future as discussed above. Based on the sunrotary provided in Table 1, the total square footage of building space under the original design concept is 1,045,500 ~, excluding the outdoor facilities such as the "Quick Draw" and Festival Square areas. Of this 1,045,500 ~, the total square footage permitted within the WSP area in the original concept design and with City approvals is estimated to be about 695,000 ft2, including the full 100,000 ft2 of commercial area allocated in Phases 1 and 2 of the hotel and the 20,000 ft2 administrative area. The current design concept encompasses approximately 459,700 ft:, including 69,960 f-t2 of commercial support uses. Thus, the total square footage of all proposed facilities falls well within the total square footage and is approximately 235,300 ft2 less than originally authorized by the City when it granted approvals in 1995. What are the major differences between the current and original design concept? Perhaps the greatest change is a decision to disaggregate the massing of square footage originally allocated to the hotel and Wild West Arena into several structures. All of the facilities proposed in the current conceptual design are ancillary or supportive to tile two primary facilities (hotel and Wild West Arena) that were approved for Area A of the WSP. Some uses have been trm~ferred fi'om the Old Town area, but it is our interpretation that comparable facilities were envisioned in the WSP authorization, such as the auditorium (opera house), wine and food exhibition hall (exhibition uses), and cabaret theatre (dinner flleatre) in support of the hotel, and the museum (Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Museum/Exhibition facility) in support of, or as part of the Wild West Arena. Similarly, the approximately 69,600 ft~ of commercial area is consistent with the Phase 1 and 2 allocations of commercial square footage allocated as part of the hotel. Although the original footprints of buildings have been altered, the focus on the western theme for the entertainment venue has not changed and by disaggregating the facilities fixrough redesign, the visual impacts of the large hotel and arena structures will be reduced, enhancing the visual setting compared to the original design concept. In particular, the original design concept of the hotel showed a very large massed visual feature (up to 300,000 ft~ in Phase 1 and an additional 100,000 fi2 in Phase 2) and the arena was envisioned as a large, circus/tent-like structure (175,000 with stripes. In the design concept presently under consideration by to the City, both of these facilities have been redesigned by creating several structures, thereby reducing the overall visual impact of the project. In addition, by enclosing the arena structures and providing for insulation and climate control, potential noise impacts to residences along Pujol have been substantially reduced. For these reasons, the proposed. i.e. current, design concept is fully consistent with the WSP requirements and overall approvals granted to the project in 1995. Based on fitis rexfew, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant land use effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred wkich may cause new, significant l,'md use effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant !and use effects not previously discussed. Therefore, land use impacts from implementing the current design concept remain within the scope of analysis contained in file certified EIR. R:WOILMS\CEQA.IES 9/2~97 klb 8 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unl~r~ L~s Tha~ Significant Mitigation $i!~ficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? [] [] [x] {] Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? [] [] [x] [] c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? [ ] [ ] [x] [ ] Eyaluation of Addendum Issues: The population issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact because population increases associated with the original project were not forerest to exceed growth thresholds. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the total development proposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development envisioned in the original project. Population increases should be comparably decreased, thus, population impacts remain nonsignificant. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant population effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant population effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant population effects not previously discussed. The development proposed is likely to reduce overall potential population impacts of the prqiect because a lower demand will be created for new employees. Therefore, population impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified El:P,. The housing issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact because housing demands associated with the original project were not forecast to exceed housing development capacity. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the total development proposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development envisioned in the original project. Housing demand increases shotfid be comparably decreased, thus, housing impacts remain nonsignificant. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant population or housing effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new. significant population or housing effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant population or housing effects not previously discussed. The development proposed is likely to reduce overall potential housing denland impacts of the project because a lower demand will be generated by new employees and a lower population forecast. Therefore, population and housing impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. R:XFORIvlS\CEQA.IES 9/22/9710b 9 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Si~fi~c~nt Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMSi Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving? a. Fault rupture? [] [ ] [x] [ ] b. Seismic ground shaking? [ ] Ix] [ ] [ ] c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? [1 [] Ix] [1 d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? [ ] [ ] [ ] [x] e. Landslides or mudflows? [] [ ] Ix] f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions form excavation, grading or fill? [1 [xl [ ] [ I g. Subsidence of the land? [1 [1 Ix] [ ] h. Expansive soils? [ ] [x] [ ] [ ] i. Unique geologic or physical features? [ ] [1 Ix] Evaluation of Addendum I~$ues: The earth resource issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigation measures to reduce potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact. Detailed gettechnical studies were available for the project site and none of the earth resource circumstances has clmnged since the approval in 1995. Although the current design concept envisions more structures, the total square footage proposed in the current design concept encompasses 459,700 square feet (fta) which is less than could have been built under the City's 1995 approvals (695,000 ft2 )as summarized in Enclosure I. All mitigation measures identified for the project in the Initial Study were adopted by the City and all of these measures can and will be implemented by the applicant. The basic footprint of grading activity for the project remains essentially the same (encompassing WSP areas A, B and C, as proposed in the original EIR, with proposed cut slopes identified for the Western By-pass being implemented at a 1.5/1 slope ratio (horizontal to vertical). This is consistent with the original topographic modifications, but with slightly longer slopes (20 feet maximum) due to the elevation at which the Western By-pass Road will be constructed. Such slopes require certification as suitable by a qualified gettechnical professional before they can be constructed and the modifications are consistent with the discussion in the EIR. With certification by the gettechnical engineer, the earth resource impacts can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new. significant earth resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant earth resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant earth resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, earth resource impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. R:~FOILMS\CEQA. IES 9,'2~97 !rib ] 0 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unlem ~ Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and mount of surface runoff? [1 Ix] [ ] [1 b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? [l Ix] [] [1 Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? [1 Ix] [ ] [ ] d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? [1 Ix] [ I [] e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? [l [1 Ix] [] Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? [l [] Ix] [1 g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? [] [l Ix] [ ] h. hnpacts to groundwater quality? [] Ix] [ ] [ ] i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? [1 [l Ix] Evaluation of Addendum Issues: The water issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigation measures to reduce potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact. Three issues were addressed under this topic: surface runoff and flood hazards; water quality; and water consmnption. The evaluation in the Initial Study showed that surface runoff/flood hazard impacts would be controlled by retaining added surface runoff from development on Area A and delivering it to Mumeta Creek without causing increased flooding downsu'eam or erosion. This circumstance has not changed with the current design concept. The. uses and area affected by the project have not clumged and the water quality mitigation will apply equally to the current project. Finally, overall water consumption will be reduced due to the overall reduction in square footage of uses. With implementation of the identified mitigation measures, the current design concept impacts will continue to be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. Based on tiffs review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new. significant water resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant water resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant water resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, water resource impacts from implementing file current design concept rcmain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. P.:~FOI~MS\CEOA.IES 9/22./97 'Lib ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than gignificant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5. AI~ QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Ix] [1 [ ] [ ] b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? [ ] Ix] [ ] [ ] c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate? [ ] [1 Ix] [l d. Create objectionable odors? [ ] [ ] [x] [ ] Evaluation of Addendum !~$!~es: Air quail .ty was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was, therefore, evaluated in the EIR. Both short- and long-term air quality impacts were quantified as being significant. A review of construction emissions indicates that fugitive dust emissions calculation was based on a total of 87 acres of construction at a given time. The proposed project will encompass approximately 80 acres of area (47 acres in Area A), ten acres of adjacent area for mass grading, and about 23 acres in the First Street and Western By-pass corridors. Thus, construction emissions, including fugitive dust, are forecast to be less than identified in the EIR and, even though significant, the current design concept will not cause greater construction emissions. Project operation, or long-term emissions, were based on traffic flows associated with a total of 1,045,500 square feet (ft2 ) of facilities and the proposed project envisions only 459,700 ft2 of facilities. Emissions from these facilities will be less, both because facilities will utilize less energy and because overall traffic flow will be reduced due to fewer square feet of entertainment venue destinations. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented as required, but both short- and long-term air quality impacts will remain significant, but well within the forecast contained in the EIR. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant air quality effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred wlfich may cause new, significant air quality effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant air quality effects not previously discussed. Therefore, air quality impacts from implementing the current design concept remain wiflfin the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. P, :XFORMS\CEQA.[ES 9/2~97 12 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Pot~-ntially Significant Potentially Unle~ Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion? [] Ix] [ ] [] b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)? [l [x] [] [] c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? [ ] [ ] Ix] [ ] d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? [] Ix] [] [] e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [] Ix] [] f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ I Ix] [1 [l g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? [ I [1 Ix] [] Evaluation of Addendum Issues; Transportation/circulation issues were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and they were, therefore, evaluated in the E[R. All transportation/circulation impacts are mitigable to a nonsignificant level after application of mitigation, including the construction of major infrastructure improvements such as two bridges, freeway interclmnge improvements, and the Western By-pass road to Vincent Moraga Road. A review of the proposed current design concept indicates that traffic will be redirected from Old Town to Area A of the WSP, and the mitigation for access to Area A, as identified in the revised traffic report, will ensure that all transportation/circulation impacts are mitigated to a nonsignificant level. The mitigation includes relocation of Vincent Moraga to the noahwest and extension of the Western By-pass road a few hundred feet to this new intersection. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR and the revised traffic study will be implemented and traffic/circulation impacts will be reduced to a nonsignificant level. The traffic study is attached as Enclosure I to this document and it includes responses to issues raised at the August 18, 1997 Planning Commission workshop. Based on fids review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant transportation/circulation effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant transportation/circulation effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant transportation/circulation effects not previously discussed. The bottom line with the transportation/circulation ixnpacts for the current design concept is that impacts can be fully mitigated as outlined in the attached traffic study. Therefore, transportation/circulation impacts from implementing the current design concept remain within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. RAFO~MS\CEQA.IES 9/2~97 Idb ] 3 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)? [1 Ix] [ ] b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? [] [ ] Ix] [ ] c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? 11 Ix] [ d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? [ ] [x] [] [1 e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [1 Ix] [ ] [1 Evaluation of Addendum Issue~: Biological resources were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was, therefore, evaluated in the EIK All biological resource impacts, including endangered species, habitat and wetland issues, were determined to be potentially significant, but mitigable to a nonsignificant level after application of extensive mitigation. A review of the footprint of the proposed current design concept footprint indicates that the same amount of acreage will be disturbed in the WSP area, in the bridge corridors, and in the First Street areas of disturbance as projected in the EIR. Within the WSP and along the Western By-pass the EIR evaluation assumed that all 87.9 acres would be disturbed, including the area required for cuts and fills along the corridor. No specific definition of the boundaries of the cuts and fills was possible when the EIR was completed, but an accurate estimate of disturbance was possible based on the footprint of the total area of disturbance. Subsequently, negotiations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) identified mitigation that was accepted for the area to be disturbed as defined in the EIlL understanding that exact acreage could not be precisely determined until final engineering was completed. As a result, extra mitigation for disturbance was proposed and accepted by FWS and full mitigation has been provided for endangered species and habitat losses. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be imple~nented and based on negotiated regulatory permits, the impacts will remain within the forecast contained in the EIR. Based on tiffs review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant biological resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant biological resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant biological resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, biological resource impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [l [] {l [xl b. Use non-renewal resources in a xvasteful and inefficient manner? [1 1] Ix] I I Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? [l [1 Ix] l] P,:XFORMS\CEQA.[ES 9/2W97 'ldb 14 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Evaluation of Addendum Issues: The natural resource, mineral and energy, issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience an3' significant adverse impact because no mineral resources will be affected by the project and adequate energy resources are available to meet forecast demand for the foreseeable future. The proposed current design concept Ires not potential to alter this conclusion since no such resources occur within the area of potential effect and energy consumption will be reduced because of less one/half of the square footage will be constructed and the arena is now an enclosed, not open, area. Thus, natural resource impacts remain nonsignificant. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant natural resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant natural resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant natural resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, natural resource impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. 9. ttAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation)? (1 [x] [ ] [ ] b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Ix] [1 c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? [ ] [x] [ ] [ I d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? [1 Ix] [1 11 e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? [l [xl [1 Evaluation of Addendum Is$0es: The risk of upset issues were addressed in tile Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact because policies and measures included in the City's General Plan guide management and control of such upsets. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the same policies and measures apply to the new project. Thus, risk of upset impacts remain nonsignificant. The health risk issues were also addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse health risk impact because the proposed uses do not entail activities fl~at create health risks. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the uses remain the same and total development proposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development envisioned in the original project. Health risk impacts should be comparably decreased, thus, healill risk impacts remain nonsignificant. Based on flus review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, sigmficant risk of upset or health risk effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant risk of upset or health risk effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant risk of upset or health risk effects not previously discussed. Therefore, risk of upset and health risk impacts from nnple~nenting the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the R:~J:OILMS\CEQA.IES 9/22/97 klb 15 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially glgniiicant Potentially Unless ~ Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact certified EIR. 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? [x] [ ] [ ] [ ] b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? [l Ix] [ ] [] Evaluation of Addendum Issues: Noise was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was, therefore, evaluated in the ErR. Both short- and long-term noise impacts were quantified and determined to be potentially significant, but mitigable to a nonsignificant level. A review of the proposed current design concept footprint indicates that the same general amount of acreage will be disturbed during construction, the noise impacts can be reduced to a nonsignificant level through the mitigation measures identified in the ErR. The noise impacts from operating the facilities in Old Town becomes a moot point since no facilities are initially proposed in this area. The noise impacts from the arena and other facilities in Area A will be reduced even further than proposed mitigation because the arena will be a solid, insulated structure that will contain noise from operations much better than the original tent. All pertinent mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented and based on implementation of these measures, the impacts will remain within the forecast contained in the ErR. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant noise effects; no substantial changes in cixmmstances have occurred which may cause new, significant noise effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant noise effects not previously discussed. In fact. the current design concept will reduce overall operational noise impacts. Therefore, noise impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? [1 [x] [ ] [] b. Police protection? [ ] [x] [ ] [ ] c. Schools? [ ] [ ] Ix] [ ] d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? [l Ix] (1 e. Other governmental services? [ ] [1 [x] l] Evaluation of Ad. dendum I~sue$: The public service issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigation measures to reduce potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact. Public service impacts will be mitigated by providing resources (infrastructure and capacity increases) to address those service impacts where demand requires mitigation, and through no effect for other impacts, like recreation facilities. These same measures must be applied to current design concept and, as a result of reduced demand because of the reduced size of the project, the net result is that there will be no increase in public service demand impacts. With implementation of file required mitigation measure, the public service impacts either remain RSFORMS\CEQA.IES 9/22/97 klb 1 6 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES ' Potzntially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact nobsignificant, or can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. Based on this review, implementation of the cm~nt design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant public service effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant public service effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant public service effects not previously discussed. Therefore, public service impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EI]~. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? [ ] [ ] Ix] [ ] b. Communications systems? [ ] [1 [x] [ ] c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? [ I Ix] [ ] [l d. Sewer or septic tanks? [ ] [x] [ ] [ ] e. Storm water drainage? [ ] [x] [ ] [ ] f. Solid waste disposal? [ ] [ ] [x] [ ] g. Local or regional water supplies? [ ] [ ] [x] [ ] Evaluation of Addendum Issues: The utility issues were addressed in the Initial Study. It was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse utility impacts because adequate infrastructure connections are available at the properry's periphery. As a result of reduced demand because of the reduced size of the project, the net result is that there will be no increase in overall utility demand impacts. With implementation of the required mitigation measure, the utility impacts either remain nonsignificant. Based on ftis review, imple~nentation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant utility effects; no substantial changes in circmnstances have occurred which may cause new, significant utility effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant utility effects not previously discussed. Therefore, utility impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. R:WORMS\CEQA.IES 9/22/97 ldb 17 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Lean Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? [ ] Ix] [ ] [ ] b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () Ix] [ ) [] c. Create light or glare? [ ] Ix] [ ] [ ] Evaluali0n of Addendum Issues: Aesthetic/visual impacts were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and they were, therefore, evaluated in the EIK All aesthetic impacts were determined to be mitigable to a nonsignificant level after application of extensive mitigation, including rapid revegetation of the cut slopes along the Western By-pass Road and on the berm adjacent to residents on Pujol Street. A review of the proposed current design concept indicates that the original pad elevation will be lower than shown in visual simulations; that the large mass of the hotel will be divided into several structures; and the tent-like arena will be replaced with a smaller, building. Cut slope length will be increased relative to that previously shown, but the combination of lowered pad elevation and landscape revegetation identified to mitigate this impact will be implemented as envisioned in the certified EIR and provided in the current landscape plan. This is shown in the new visual simulation of the project developed to illustrate the changes from the original design concept This new simulation is available at the Planning Department for review and consideration. Implementation of all proposed mitigation measures can ensure that all aesthetic impacts will be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented and aesthetic impacts will be reduced to a nonsignificant level. The light and glare issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigation measures to reduce potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact. Light and glare impacts are controlled by meeting performance requirements (absolute thresholds) established by Cal Tech for the Mt. Palomar Observatory. These same measures must be applied to current design concept and the net result is no additional light and glare impacts. With implementation of the required mitigation measure, the light and glare impacts can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant aesthetic effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant aesthetic effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant aesthetic effects not previously discussed. The net effect with the aesthetic impacts for the current design concept is that impacts can be fully mitigated in the same manner as for the original design concept by utilizing the same intensive cut slope revegetation program. Therefore, aesthetic impacts from implementing the current design concept remain within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. R:~FORMS\CEQA.IES 9/22/97 klb ] 8 ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES Potentially Significant Potentially Unl~r~ Le~ Tha~ Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorlrmrated Impact Imp,~ 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? [ I [l Ix] [1 b. Disturb archaeological resources? [1 [l Ix] [1 c. Affect historical resources? [ ] [x] [ ] [] d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? [ ] [] Ix] [l e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area7 [] [1 [xl EvaluatiQn Qf Addend!~m Isles: The cultural resource issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse cultural resource impact because no cultural resources occur within Area A based on site specific surveys and because no facilities will be placed within Old Town at this time where historical structures exist The proposed cun'ent design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the uses remain the same and the area affected remains the same. Cultural resource impacts remain nonsignificant under the current design concept. Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant cultural resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant cultural resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant cultural resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, cultural resource impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR. 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? [1 Ix] [1 [1 b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? [1 [] Ix] [] Evalu,ati0n of Addendum Issues: The recreation issues were addressed n the Imtial Studv and it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant adverse recreation impact because the proposed uses provide recreation and do not affect any existing or future recreation uses. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the uses remain the same. Recreation impacts remain nonsignificant under the current design concept. Based on tiffs review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with new, significant recreation effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new, significant recreation effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant recreation effects not previously discussed. Therefore, recreation impacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIl~. R:LFORMS\CEQA.IES 9/22/97 klb ] 9 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildIre species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? [l [xl [ I [l b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? [x] [] [] Does the project have impacts that area individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). Ix] [1 [ ] [] Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [ ] Ix] [ ] [1 Evaluation of Addendum Issues: The purpose of this analysis has been to determine whether the current design concept, which represents two years of design evolution and facility selection for Area A of the WSP, will cause additional or different significant effects than those forecast in the Final EIR certified by the City in 1995. Fundamentally, the current design concept remains relatively close to the original in terms of focus and types of uses. As discussed in the project description in this Initial Study and the Land Use evaluation 1, the original structures in Area A of the WSP have been separated into individual support uses that were originally envisioned to be contained within one facility, such as the auditorium/opera house being separated from the hotel and the museum being separated from the wild west arena. Based on the evaluation of the new design concept as presented above, implementation the current project would not alter the findings reached within the certified Final EIR. The only issues of real concern are the change in the cut slopes which will be lengthened, not increased in absolute elevation or visibility, due to lowering the elevation of the Western By-pass road and traffic flows, which have been reduced overall from the original project. The new traffic study, the new visual simulation, and the required mitigation illustrate how the aesthetic impacts remain as depicted in the Final EIR. As described in the final EIK the cut slope impacts can be reduced to a nonsignificant level by implementing the rapid and effective revegetation of these slopes in accordance with mitigation requirements and as demonstrated in the landscape plan being reviewed for the current project by the City. 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, purmant to the tiering, program EIK or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. Earher analyses used. Identi~ earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. The certified Final EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project was relied upon in preparing this Jnitial Study and Addendum. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. ,4 ll impacts evaluated in this R:WORMS\CEQA. IliS 9/22297 Idb 20 document include mitigation measures, and monitoring plans, that were adopted when the original project was approved and the Final EIR certified in 1995. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Signilicant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures wh/ch were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-~c conditions for the project. No revisions to original mitigation measures have been required for the current project, but specific measures are more well defined at this point. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 4. Old Town Redevelopment Project, Final Environmental Impact Report, 1995 RSFORMS\CEQA. IE$ 9/22/97 Idb 21 TRAFFIC STUDY R:\$TAFFRPT~298PA97.1~l 10/2/97 v~w '[ 7 WILBUN SMITH ASSOCIATES ~N(~IN~ERS o PLANNERS 2300 ~. KATI;LLA AVE. ,, SUI~ 275 , ANAHEIM. CA 92806-'6047 , (114) 970-8110 , FAX (714) 978-1109 Augus. t 11, I997 Zev Buffman President Temecula Ente'rta~ent 41934 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mr. Buffman: · , Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA.) is pleased to submit thlsFina. lReport which documents the key findings of the traffic study update we have completed for the Old To~m Entertainment Center project located in Temecula California. The purpose of this study is re-evaluate traffic impacts of the project based on various revisions which have been made to the Old Town Entertainment Center since the EIR traffic study was performed in October 1994. The focus of the traffic study update is to assess impacts of the proposed project revisions on traffic generation, and traffic distribution. The general scope of WSA's work is designed to respond to the City of Temccula's request to review the currently proposed project plan and verify the net change in traffic impacts from the original EIR study, which would result from the revised plan. A more detailed description of work tas 'ks ~vhich were involved in the preparation of a "traffic study update" for the Old Town Entertainment Center (OTEC) is provided below: l) Review land use components of the currently defined OTEC and note differences which will require a re-evaluation of trip generation. Any change in the seating capacities and/or planned "show" schedules for the major project venues will require adjustments in trip generation. 2) The traffic generation assessment generally applies previously accepted methodology (used in the Banon-Aschman study) to re-assess vehicular traffic generation for the project. As addressed in the Barton-Aschman study, traffic generation for the revised pi'oject is estimated for both the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak-hour condition. These peak-hour periods represent the critical period of operation for the street system in the vicinity of the project. It is d~ring this period that additlon,'d traffic generated by the ,AI..~.A/~. NY · AN~. CA · AILA~A. GA · C:Ai"~, ~5;¥r"1' · C;HAJ"a~SI'Of, I. ~C. * I.-OJS'TC~, 1'7, · KNOXVI LE. 11',1 * LE)CNGION, K'Y * LCX',IDC)IN, !~G,L,~ND · I,.4'J..W^t.,~E.Va · Nk'W HAV~N. Cl * OAXt. ANO. CA. Of'4.ANOO. FL · P~~ PA · I'ZALEJC-,H.. NC I~CHMCNO. VA, ROSELLE. IL * SAN FRANCISCO. C;A · S,~N JOSE. CA * $~NG^PORE · IALL*,HASSF. E. FL , IAI,.APA. I:L EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Zcv Buffman August 11, 1997 Page 2 · 'WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES project could potentially tmvc the most significant impact on area traffic operation. A comparative analysis is presented of the updated project traffic gencratlon study findings and the previous study traffic generation estimates. 3) Vehicle trip distribution characteristics for the project were re-evaluated and adjusted based on the current spacial distributior/of activity nodes within the project as well as planned parking facilities. 4) Based on the updated project traffic generation (estimated in Task 2) and revised trip distribution characteristics (evaluated in Task 3), updated traffic assignments of project- related traffic were developed for the study area street network. Updated project traffic assigamen~ were developed for b~th the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak-hour condition. A comparative analysis was made of the updated project traffic assignments and the previous study traffic assignments. · 5) WSA reviewed the proposed northerly relocation of the Vincent Moraga connection with the Western Bypass concerning traffic operations and parking accessibility. Updated Project Land Use Current ~roject land use, as defined by Tcmccula Entertainment, is summarized in Table 1. It should be noted that Phase II uses.include one theater (refered to t~s the "Palace Theater") wlxich is actually anticipated to be implemented in a third development phase. For purposes of the cummulative project traffic generation analysis, it is conservatively assumed that this entertainment venue occurs in Phase II. Based on discussions with Temecula Entertainment, it is our understanding fixat Phase I and Phase II are expected to bc completed by the fourth quarter of 1998 and fourth quarter of 1999 rcpcctively. Project Trit~ Generation WSA has carefully reviewed the principal land use components of the revised project including seating capacities, floor areas, and event schedules. It was also important to gain a good understanding of the planned operations and inten'elationships of the various project uses. 'o .o o ~ A z z Zev Buffman August 11; 1997 Page 3 · ' ' VVILUUI% ' SMITH ASSOCIATES One critical refinement which has been made since the last study. relates to the planned scheduling of shows and events which would occur at the arena and various theaters within the project. These schedules, which we undostand would be controlled by the project operator/manager, have a direct affect on the magnitude of project-related traffic impacts which would be experienced during the normal weekday evening (5:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and Saturday midday (l :00 to 2:00 p;m. peak-hou~ periods. Current event/show programming for the project generally schedule mo~t weekday events and shows commencing at 7:30, 8:00 or 8:30 p.m. On weekends, the events/shows would be scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m., 3:00-3:30 p.m., or 7:30-8:30 p.m. If these event/show schedule times are implemented, related traffic impacts would be nominal din-ins the typical traffic peak-hours on the study area street system. WSA has taken a very conservative approach in the methodology used to derive project-related traffic during the high~vay peak-hour periods. In the case of the arena and theaters, it is assumed that all venues are operating at maximum seating capacities that a minimum of i0 percent of the generated trips for the event/show would occur during the preceding highway pe~-hour regardless of the time differential. Typically, all attendees arrive well within a 90 minute period preceding "show time." The trip generation analysis also includes the conservative assumption that the "Food and Wine Court" would at the same level as featured dining establishment in terms of its ability to draw public to the project. In reality, most food court facilities typically operate as an "amenity" to the major attractors such as retail and princip~l event/show venues and rarely draw public to a project on'their own. It should be noted that some of the land uses within the project were assessed to be incidental or passive in nature and are not expected to contribute significantly to the primary attraction of vehicle trips to the project. These include the chapel, Roy Rogers Experience/Museum (and down-sized virtual reality venue), and informal/incidental entertainment components of the dining and retail core. As described to us, the chapel located on the central courtyard portion of the project site, would serve as an informal place of rest and self-reflection/meditation for visitors. The Roy Rogers Experience/museum and virtual reality ride as well as other general entertainment components of the project are considered as a secondary-level attracdon~ available to visitors attending the primary events/shows, dining establishments and retail shopping attractions. Based on similar entertainment-oriented projects, these secondary-level uses become incidental to the primary attractions. Traffic generation for these uses is considered insignificant relative to traffic generation for the primary attractions. Zev Buffman August 11, 1997 Page 4, VVILDUI< SMITH' ASSOCIATES Assumptions used in the derivation of traffic generation for each of the primary project land uses (wlfich are .expected to generate traffic) have been summarized by project phase and are attached. A summary of gross vehicle trips estimated to be generated by project Phase I and Phase II during the weekday and Saturday peak-hour periods is presented in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. A comparison of the gross vehicle trip generation for the currently defined project Phase I with the earlier Barton Aschman study indicates a substantial reduction in gross weekday peak-hour trips (170 rs. 1,825 inbound vehicles and 50 rs. 780 outbound vehicles). The reduction in gross Saturday peak-hour vehicle trips is also significant (I 70 rs. 2,425 inbound vehicles and 170 vs. 850 outbound vehicles). A similar comparison of cummulative gross vehicle trip generation for the currently defined project Phase I and II with the earlier Barton Aschman study of Phase I indicates a smaller but still significant reduction in weekday peak-hour trips (841 rs. 1,825 inbound vehicles and 435 vs. 780 outbound vehicles). For the Saturday peak hour, the current estimate of cumulative Phase I and II gross peak-hour vehicle trips is again substantially lower thm~ that estimated for Phase I in the earlier Barton Asch.man study (996 rs. 2,425 inbound vehicles and 660 vs. 850 outbound vehicles). Gross trip estimates developed for the project are adjusted to reflect the interaction of trips between individual uses on the project site and Old Town Temecula. This trip interaction is referred to as "internal trip-making" and occurs in the pedestrian mode of travel. For Phase I of the project, the analysis conservatively assumes that no internal trip-making occurs. In reality, there would be opportunity for trip interactions between the arena and Old Town. For Phase II, it is assumed that up to 65 percent of. the hotel trips would be intemaI to the project and Old Town. It in also assumed that up to 50 percent of the dining and retail trips would be internal to the project and Old Town.. These. are basically the same.internal trip-making assumptions applied in the previous study. Illustrated summaries of the f'mal "adjusted" trip generation assessment for Project Phase II (Weekday Evening and Saturday Midday Peak-Hour) conditions are provided in Figures 1 a and 2a. Also provided, for comparison, are the previous trM'fic study trip generation summaries Table 2 Phase I Trip Generation Old Town Entertainment Center .WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR (5:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M.) LAND USE COMPONENTS ' 'INBd[J'ND Wild West Arena Administration/Back of House 160 10 170 VEHICLE TRIPS OUTBOUND 0 50 50 .TO.TAL 160 60 220 SATURDAY PEAK HOUR (1:00 P.M. TO 2:00 P.M'.) LAND USE COMPONENTS Wild West Arena Administration/Back of House 'INBO'UND 160 10 170 VEHICLE TRIPS ,== OUTBOUND 160 10 170 TOTAL 320 20 340 Table 3a Phase I! Trip Generation (~) WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR (5:00 P,M, TO 6:00 P,M,) Otd Town Entertainment Center LAND USE COMPONENTS GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS INBOUND OUTBOUND TOTAL la Wild West Arena 200 0 200 2 Celibrity 73 0 73 3 Studio Theater 25 25 50 4 Western Dinner Theater 17 0 17 7 Palace Theater 73 0 73 Sub-Total 388 25 413 5 Food andVVine Court 60 30 90 6a Dining , 60 20 80 6b Retail 220 220 440 Sub-Total 340 270 610 8 Hotel 103 90 193 lb Administration/Back of House 10 50. 60 Total 841 435 1,276 (1) ~rip generation represents gross vehicle trips without adjustment for internal trip-making. · Table 3b Phase II Trip Generation I~ SATUi~DAY PEAK HOUR (1;00 P.M. TO 2:00 P.M.) Old Town Entertainment Center LAND USE coMPONENTS GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS INBOUND OUTBOUND TOTAL la Wild West Arena 200 200 400 2 Ce!ibrity 73 0 73 3 Studio Theater 75 10 85 4 Western Dinner Theater 42 0 42 7 Palace Theater 73 0 73 Sub-Total 463 ' 210 673 5 Food and Wine Court : 60 30 90 6a Dining 60 20 80 6b Retail 300 300 600 Sub-Total 420 350. 770 8 Hotel 103 90 193 o. lb Administration/Back of House 10 10 20 · Total 996 660 1,656 (1) 'i'rip generation represents gross vehicle trips without adjustment for internal trip-making. Zev Buffman August II, 1997 Page 5 V ¥ II.,I.J~J I\ SMITH ASSOCIATES for the same analysis .periods. These are shown in Figure lb and 2b for lhe weekday and Saturday peak-hours respectively. Findings of the updated trip generation analysis are as follows: Net vehicle trip generation for the revised project Phase I land use is 170 inbound and 50 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 170 inbound and 170 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour. Net cumulative vehicle trip generation for the revised project Phase I and H land use is 539 inbound and 216 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 672 inbound and 322 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour. ..: For comparison, the net vehicle trip generation for the earlier defined project Phase I land use was 995 inbound and 325 outbin.rod vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 1,475 inbound and 330 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour. Trip generation for the currently proposed Project Phase I represents less than 17 percent of the total weekday peak hour trip generation estimated in the EIR traffic study. In this case the reduction in peak hour trips is fairly evenly distributed between inbound and outbound traffic. Saturday midday peak hour trip generation for the revised Project Phase I represents less than 19 percent of the total trip gencratlon estimated in the EIR traffic study. For the Saturday peak hour, the greatest reduction in trips occurs in the inbound traffic direction. The new outbound traffic estimate represents approximately 52 percent of the outbound traffic given in the EIR study. Cumulative weekday peak hour trip generation for the currently proposed Project Phase I and II represents approximately 54 percent of file total Phase I EIR study trip generation with close to equal trip reduction in both the inbound and outbound directions. rnF- ~0 r'r-Z 0 0 0 0 O' 0 t'LL! 0 LLI 0 Z Zev Buffman August I1, 1997 Page 6 .... WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES For the Saturday .midday peak hour, proposed Project Phase I and II cumulative trip generation is'estimated to represent only 55 percent of the total trips estimated for Phase I in the earlier study. For the Saturday analysis condition, most trip reductions associated with tile current project plan occur in 'the inbound direction. The outbound trip generation level is currently estimated at approximately 98 percent 'of that given in the Phase I EIR study. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment WSA has reviewed the trip distribution assumptions included in the previous EIR traffic study. Adjustanents have been made in the inmaediate study area to reflect the shift of all project land uses out of the central Old Town area and consolidated on the site adjacent to the Western By- pass. A major factor considered in the re-distribution of projcct trips is also tile revised location of designated parking areas oh the project site and existing parking in Old Town. The revised project-related trip distribution is provided in Figure 3. All but approximately 8 percent of the traffic is estimated to approach the project via file Western Bypass, 1st Street, and Vincent Moraga Drive. Based on the revised trip generation and trip distribution, Phase I and Phase I and II combined project trips were assigned to the area street system for the weekday and Saturday analysis scenarios. The results of the assignment procedure are presented in Figures 4 and 5 which also show the previous study traffic assig.nment. As can be seen in Figure 4a and 4b, all of the current Phase I traffic volumes at the affected intersections are substantially lower than those previously estimated. With the currently proposed Phase I, project traffic volumes would be less than 19 percent of that previously estimated for the weekday peak-hour condition and less than 25 percent of the previously estimated for the Saturday peak-hour ctndition. Traffic assignments shown in Figure 5a and 5b indicate that the cumulative Phase I and II traffic volumes resulting from the current proposal would be be lower in almost all cases at individual intersection movements and in all cases based on total traffic added to the intersections. ,,% LEGEND = OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PL~'q ENTERTAIN!,IENT 'CORE' EN'I'F.J~TAIN!~ENT 'CORE' TRIP DISTRIBUTION PRO"JECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ....... ........................ i I ~ ~ _ iii i r C.~fomtt N.T.S. PROJECT WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 'r~ I Barton--Aschman Associates. Inc. CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT C~11fo, mJa · .. I~LT.S. 4-.~ P~ ]~ P~CT · . PROJECT WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ! BarLon-Aschman, ,Associates. Inc. CITY OF TI:MECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Zev Buffman Augugt 11, 1997 Page 7 .... WIEBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Vincent Moraga Drive. Extension Realignment The specific issue ~hich was requested to be addressed involves the proposed realignment of Vincent Moraga Drive extension to the Western Bypass at the north end of the project site. In the Conceptual Master Plan, the proposed alignment of the Vincent Moraga Drive extension resulted in a bisection of the parking area located at the north end of the site. This presented a situation which required access drives to three separate parking lots formed by the road alignment. This parking access layout would have resulted in a relatively high potential 'for turning movement conflicts, related accidents, and traffic congestion. · As currently proposed, the alignment of the Vincent Moraga Drive extension is shifted north in a manner which would essentially place all parking on the south side. With this configuration, only two parking lots would be formed with a collector-type street serving as access to both lots. The proposed intersection spacing along the Vincent Moraga Drive extension is more 1~vorable than in the Conceptual Master Plan and fewer potential turning movement conflicts would result. With the current street alignment and parking layout WSA recommends parking access locations as depicted in Figure 6. Conclusions The results of the WSA traffic upda. te demonstrate that, the currently defined Phase I and combined Phase I and II project would have significantly lower traffic impacts than the previous study estimated. This is evident by the comparative findings of both the trip generation analysis as well as the trip assignment evaluation. Modifications to the project land uses, location of uses, and the programmed schedule of events/shows have cumulatively contributed the reduction in traffic impacts. \ Zcv Buffman August 1I, 1997 Page $ .... WlLBU!~ ...... SMITH ASSOCIATES Should you have any questions concerning our findings, please contact me (714) 978-gl 10. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Robert A. Davis Principal Transportation Planner RAD:rad Attackments Jb 0 ~'o lb 5Kn,,aD4,,¢ 1: or) PM To 2.: oo P~I P~K-I-I~u,,~ $h'olu 4ss¢~_ eO P~!d"F /J,,~Itl~ Mr'Fd/~J I J/~ Hou&~.OF ,SHoI,J I~(,ooX o, 14) = .16C) .vrH;m~--s/~v~u~ I__~Bcu_~b _ ~trr~p_B_ · .'. " 160 460 .. .'/'~o .~'70 A~s~£ lo' p~couT- EXrT L"I :o0 % Z.'co · o oo o. X o. I0: ZDO ~ v~ 1~sou~ 30 '~' I. Z /:'?v = ZS' u~F_.,,tlCZ.~ E)uT"~t,wb 4:30 5':00 TY~zoc;~t F'~&: 5':00 %' (. ;ha P~. 22D. Vr~r.z.r~ Dv-r'8~o~) ~4X --- 2tooO v~.te'L~..3 X. c~. ~ "' got) X O, I D = 2.g:O '2t~ lt~4 I:~c) .% Z.:oo P~ 0 V~:~lC.Z~S Ocrr'6m.vJb p~It~c~. 'TI-Ip-47'p_A - 'z i 200 ?~Aso4zs q' $ P?~ = '7 ~3 VK24icr.~5 "735 % o. I0 -- q$ V~:blio..E5 IA18oo,~O ~. ~o-r£c.- 25'0 Roov15 P~ WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS · PLANNERS ',, 3600 Lime. Street, ,Suit,~ '?6 Riversir'lb,. CA 92501 (7141 9.74-0566 FAX (7141 27,/i..9220 August 28, 1997 Zev Buffman President Temecula Entertainment 41934 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Wild West Arena Formal Site Development Plan Conditional Use Permit Submittal Dear Mr. Buffman: in preparation of the referenced submittal package for the City of Temecula Planning Department, Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) has been requested to address the subject of traffic impacts related to the proposed Old Town Entertainment Center project. In response to this request, WSA has prepared the following discussion which addresses traffic impacts for Phase I - Wild West Arena and responds to traffic issues raised at the recent Planning Commission Workshop for the project. Traffic impacts related to Phase I of the project have been studied and are addressed in WSA's letter report dated August 11, 1997. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate traffic impacts ofthe project based on revisions which have been made to the Old Town Entertainment Center since the EIR traffic study was performed in October 1994. The focus of the traffic study update was to assess impacts of the proposed project revisions on traffic generation, and project traffic distribution on the surrounding street system. The study scope was designed to respond to the City of Temecula's request to review the currently proposed project plan and verify the net change in traffic impacts from the original EIR study, .which would result from the revised plan. The following provides an overview of the findings of the project Phase I analysis. Phase I of the project consists of the Wild West Arena which will have an initial seating capacity of 4,800 persons. the current development schedule anticipates completion of Phase I by December of 1998. \NY. NY · ALLIANCE, OH · CAIRO, EGYP[ * C!tARLESTON, SC: · COLUMI31A, $C . COLUMt3US. O1'1 * [)ES MOINES. IA · FALLS CliURCII. VA ,~G KONG · HOUSi'ON, IX. K,",IOXVIL[E, IN . LEXINGTON. KY · t. Ot"IDON, ENGLAND · l. OS ANGL:I.r-:;. CA · MIAMi. F[ - /,~I'I'NAII, Wl '~ HAVEN, CJ' · OAKLAND. CA · OF~LANDO, t'l · ['IIT$i3tJRGIt. PA · POf~ISMOUf~l. Nil · Ir'ROVIDL:I"ICE. I..'1 · P, AI.I.~G}'~. NC MC'ND. V/~ · ,:.:,~r,",,~,r,~ CA , ~O~.FI.t [II · SAN riCANCISCO. CA · SAN JOSE. CA · SINGAPORE · TOl~ONfO, CANADA · WA.*;':t]NC. fOt',~. DC EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Zev Buffman August 28, 1997 Page 2 WSA has reviewed the traffic generation assuming full utilization of the seating capacity and the planned event schedules for'the arena. These schedules, which would be controlled by the project operator/manager, have a direct affect on the magnitude of project-related traffic impacts which would be experienced during the normal weekday evening (5:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and Saturda3, midday (1:00 to 2:00 p.m. peak-hour periods. Current event/show programming for the Wild West Arena generally schedule weekday events and shows commencing at 7:30. On weekends, the events/shows would be scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m. and/or 7:30 p.m.p.m. If these event/show schedule times are implemented, related traffic impacts would be nominal during the typical traffic peak-hours on the study area street system. A comparison ofthe gross vehicle trip generation for the currently defined project Phase I with the earlier Barton Aschman study indicates a substantial reduction in gross weekday peak-hour trips (170 vs. 1,825 inbound vehicles and 50 vs. 780 outbound vehicles). The reduction in gross Saturday peak-hour vehicle trips is also significant (170 vs. 2,425 inbound vehicles and 170 vs. 850 outbound vehicles). For Phase I of the project, the trip generation analysis conservatively assumes that no internal trip- making occurs. While in reality, there would be opportunity for trip interactions between the arena and Old Town, none of the vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the project were discounted. Findings of the updated trip generation analysis have been reported as follows: Net vehicle trip generation for the revised project Phase I land use is 170 inbound and 50 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 170 inbound and 170 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour. For comparison, the net vehicle trip generation for the earlier defined project Phase I land use was 995 inbound and 325 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 1,475 inbound and 330 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour. Trip generation for the currently proposed Project Phase I represents less than 17 percent of the total weekday peak hour trip generation estimated in the EIR traffic study. In this case the reduction in peak hour trips is fairly evenly distributed between inbound and outbound traffic. Zev Buffman August 28, 1997 Page 3 Saturday midday peak hour trip generation for the revised Project Phase I represents less than 19 percent of the total trip generation estimated in the EIR traffic study. For the Saturday peak hour, the greatest reduction in trips occurs in the inbound traffic direction. The new outbound traffic estimate represents approximately 52 percent of the outbound traffic given in the EIR study. Daily trip generation for Phase I ofthe project is estimated at approximately 9,750 total vehicle tr/ps for the weekday condition and 19,500 for the weekend condition. It is important to note that the Wild West Arena in anticipated to have only one show per week on a weekday (Friday) and occasionally two shows per day on the weekend days. As such, the above daily traffic generation estimates should not be interpreted as "average" daily traffic. WSA's reviewed of the trip distribution assumptions used in the previous EIR traffic study included adjustments in the immediate study area to reflect the consolidation designated project parking areas on the project site adjacent to the Western Bypass Road. The revised project-related trip distribution estimates all but approximately 8 percent of the traffic approaching the project via the Western Bypass, 1st Street, and Vincent Moraga Drive. According to the re-distribution analysis, all of the current Phase I traffic volumes at the affected intersections are substantially lower than those previously estimated. With the currently proposed Phase i development, project traffic volumes would be less than. 19 percent of that previously estimated for the weekday peak-hour condition and less than 25 percent of the previously estimated for the Saturday peak-hour condition. The results of the WSA traffic update demonstrated that, the currently defined Phase I project would have significantly lower traffic impacts than the previous study estimated. This is evident by the comparative findings of both the trip generation analysis as well as the trip assignment evaluation. Modifications to the project land uses, location of uses, and the programmed schedule of events/shows have cumulatively contributed the reduction in traffic impacts. Additional'.,traffic issues raised at the recent Planning Commission workshop included concerns regarding traffic which would be added by the opening of the Temecula Mall and timing questions related to the programmed interchange improvements at Rancho California Road and State Route Zev Buffinan August 28, 1997 Page 4 79 South. The Temecala Mall project will add an increment ofnew traffic to the Rancho California Road/I-15 interchange which was not defined at the time the original EIR traffic study was performed. The estimated reductions in peak hour trips associated with revised Old Town Entertainment Center project would actually help in off-setting most of the added Mall traffic on Rancho California Road at the interchange and Ynez Road as compared to the original EIR traffic impact assessment at this location. Even more significant, is the mitigative impact of the programmed Rancho California Road/I- 15 interchange improvement. According to the most current construction schedule obtained from the City of Temecula Public Works Department, the Rancho California Road interchange improvement is expected to be open to traffic by December 1998. This improvement combined with the reduction in project-related traffic impacts would result in better traffic operating conditions than anticipated in the original EIR traffic study, even with the additional Mall traffic. The current schedule for the State Route 79 South/I-15 interchange shows completion of the improvement would occur by October or November 1998. This indicates that both interchange improvements would be completed before or at approximately the same time as the Wild West Arena is scheduled to open. Should you have any questions concerning our findings, please contact me (714) 978-8110. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Robert A. Davis Principal Transportation Planner ', WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS * PLANNERS 2300 E KATELLA AVE · SUITE 275 · ANAHEIM. CA 92806-6047 · (714) 078-8110 · FAX (714) c)78-1109 September 21, 1997 Zev Buffman President Temecula Entertainment 41934 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Development Review Committee Traffic Circulation Comments on Planning Application No. PA97-0298 Westside Specific Plan Dear Mr. Buffinan: Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) has been requested to address traffic circulation comments made by the City of Temecula Development Review Committee relative to the proposed Westside Specific Plan/Old Town Temecula Entertainment Center project. In response to the traffic issues raised by City staff, WSA has conducted additional analysis of the current project plan and has prepared the following discussion of the analysis findings. Review of Project Circulation Plan WSA has carefully reviewed the circulation plan proposed for the project and has analyzed issues related to: access location and spacing; sight distance; vehicle stacking requirements for principal turning movements; the need for deceleration and acceleration lanes; and traffic control requirements including traffic lane configurations and intersection controls. Also addressed in the study, are tum/ng radius considerations for larger vehicles (such as buses and trucks) expected to use the on-site circulation roadways, fire truck access and specific parking areas. Access Considerations- Primary access for the project, would be provided via the Western By-pass. Secondary access would be provided by Vincent Moraga Drive and 1 st Street. Access spacing along the Western By-pass road is a minimum of 1,320 feet (1/4-mile) for full movement intersections and a minimum of 450 feet for right-in/right-out only access drives. This spacing generally meets the City's arterial spacing policy and should provide favorable flow conditions along the Western By- pass road. AL~A,N.rY NY · ANAlJIM. CA · A~TA. GA · C~. EGYPi · C~,S~LESfON. ,~ · COLUI~A. ~ * COLU~. OH · DES ~INES. IA · F~S CHtJ¢~H, VA · H~ ~C¢ F:2i,., ~DUS]ON. TX · ~O~i~E. ~ · L~NGTON, ~ · LON~N, ENCd~ND · M~LWAUKEE, ~ · N~' ~N, CT · OAK[ ~D. CA · O~NDO, FL * Pi~',)P~4, PA. ;,.rq E,'E-,~ NF ~CHMOF~D, vA. ~SELLE, IL * SAN FRANCISCO, CA · SAN JOSE. CA · fJ~NGAPO[4E · TALLAHASSEE, EL · TAMPA. EL * IORONIO, CANADA · W&Sflff4Gf(Df¢. ~):' EMPLOYeE-OWNED COMPANY Zev Buffinan September 21, 1997 Page 2 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Minimum access spacing is 365 feet on Vincent Moraga Drive and 430 feet on 1st Street. This spacing should be adequate for these Principal Collector roadways. It is important to consider that the peak traffic periods for the project do not coincide with those of the adjacent land uses. Impacts of the project during the typical highway peak hour would be considerably less than most other potential uses for the site. Sight Distance- Given the current layout of on-site roadways, sight distance appears to be adequate at all intersection locations along the perimeter of the site. On-site intersection sight distances are also adequate at all locations with one exception. The eastbound approach of the northernmost access drive, to the north-south access road, could have a sight distance problem (looking north) if a pedestrian crosswalk is provided. A retaining wall along the west side of the north-south access road could obstruct motorist's ability to see oncoming traffic if the limit line is located behind a crosswalk. As such, pedestrians flows should be directed to cross the north-south access road north of the intersection and proceed along the east side of the access road. The final landscaping plans for the site should be reviewed to insure that comer sight lines will not be obstructed. Vehicle Stacking- WSA has reviewed general stacking requirements for peak period traffic conditions at key intersections and is working with the site engineer to display the recommended striping plan. Left-turn lanes provided on the Western By-pass road and Vincent Moraga Drive for entering project traffic should be a minimum 200 feet in length. Along First Street, between the Western By-pass road and the north-south access road, peak inbound and outbound left turn movements would require more storage length than can be provided by a back-to-back center left- turn lane. The options are to eliminate the shoulder areas and strip the two left-turn lanes s/de-by- side or provide a "reversible" center left-turn lane which could be "coned" during peak entering and e~ting periods. Since the demand for left turn movements at this location would be very "directional" during peak periods, the reversible left-turn lane concept would work quite well. Stacking for exiting traffic along the on-site access roads would be adequate. Given the typical peaking characteristics of traffic exiting from a major events, there will be some delays to traffic exiting the parking lots. With a moderate amount of manual traffic control a key on-site locations, exiting traffic would operate in a more orderly fashion with minimal delays. It is our understanding that manual traffic control would be typically provided during major events/shows. Zev Buffman September 21, 1997 Page 3 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Deceleration and Acceleration Lane Considerations- As designed, the Western By-pass road provides a cross-section of 33 feet in each direction. WSA proposes that two through lanes (one 11- foot inside lane and a 12-foot outside lane) be striped in each direction. This would leave a 1 O-foot outside shoulder area on each side. With this shoulder configuration, which .is similar to that provided along Winchester Road east of I-15, inbound right turn traffic movements can be made from the shoulder area. Given the "directional" nature of event traffic, and the ingress/egress distribution of project traffic, there would be negligible weaving movements (inbound right tums across outbound fight tums) at these locations during peak project traffic conditions. Traffic Control Features- As previously mentioned, WSA is working with the site engineer on the definition of circulation system lane striping and intersection traffic controls. It is our understanding that the conceptual striping layout is currently being incorporated into the plans. This includes a revised traffic control plan/circulation configuration for the centrally located drop-off/pick-up area. WSA will continue to work with the site engineer and City staff in the refinement of these plans. The intersection traffic control plan generally calls for two-way or all-way stop sign controls at all intersection locations except the main access intersection on the Western By-pass. Although a one- way stop control would be adequate at this location for project Phase I, a signal is recommended for project Phase II. Bus/Truck Access Considerations- WSA has reviewed the circulation layout relative to Bus and track access. Various intersection curb radius and parking layout modifications have been suggested and are being incorporated in the plans. These modifications would provide the necessary circulation design features to adequately accommodate these larger vehicles. Vincent Moraga Drive Alignment and Parking Access In WSA's August I 1, 1997 addendum traffic letter, we discuss the more favorable characteristics of the currently proposed alignment of the Vincent Moraga Drive extension. In this letter we also suggest various access dr/ve locations to on-site parking lots. It should be noted that these parking access suggestions were made prior to reviewing the revised grading plans. Based on the difference in elevation between Vincent Moraga Drive at Ridge Park Drive and the adjacent overflow parking lot, we do not recommend access to the parking lot from this intersection. Zev Buffman September 21, 1997 Page 4 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Traffic Impacts As further clarification of WSA's discussion of traffic impacts associated with the Temecula Mall project, we are providing the following supporting traffic data: · The Mall project is projected to add 208 vehicles to the northbound I- 15 ramp intersection and 116 vehicles to the southbound I- 15 ramp intersection during the weekday evening peak hour. During the Saturday midday peak hour, the Mall is projected to add 284 vehicles and 159 vehicles respectively to the northbound and southbound I-15 ramp intersections. The currently proposed Westside Specific Plan reduces impacts at the interchange by 34 vehicles (northbound ramp intersection) and 62 vehicles (southbound ramp intersection) during the weekday evening peak hour. Similarly the current project reduces impacts at the interchange by 42 vehicles (northbound ramp intersection) and 86 vehicles (southbound ramp intersection) during the Saturday midday peak hour. As can be noted from these traffic adjustments, the estimated reductions in peak hour trips associated with revised Westside Specific Plan project would help m off-setting a significant portion of the added Mall u'affic impacts on Rancho California Road at the interchange as compared to the ohginal EIR traffic impact assessment at this location. The mitigative impact of the programmed Rancho Califomia Road/I-15 interchange improvement provides an even more significant mitigative effect on the added lxaffic. This improvement, combined with the reduction in project-related traffic impacts would result in significantly better traffic operating conditions than anticipated in the original EIR traffic study, even with the additional Mall traffic. The Rancho California Road/I-15 interchange improvements were n9[ assumed to be completed in the original EIR traffic study analysis and is now scheduled to be completed prior to opening of Phase I of the Westside Specific Plan. Zev Bu/~an September 21, 1997 Page 5 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Should you have any questions concerning our findings, please contact me (714) 978-8110. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Robert A. Davis Principal Transportation Engineer WI;LBUR - 'SMITH" ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS . PLANNERS 2300 ~'."KATi~LLA AVE, · SUIT[~ 275 * ANAHEIM, CA 92806-6047 · (714) 978-8110 · PAX (714) 978-1109 October 1, 1997 Matthew Fagan Senior Planner City of Temeeula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92589 'OCT. 0 g 1997 [By' . P.E: Impact of Temecula Mall Trips on Westside Specific Plan/Old Town Temecula Entertainment Center Traffic Analysis .. . Dear Mr. Fagan: ,' ............. In response to your request, Wilbur snfith Associates (WSA) has prepared.,-the:,fo~j'~.::.'~g statement of clarification related to our assessment' of""the impact of Tenieeui'/{ Westside Specific Plan/Old Town Temeeula Entertainment Center traffic analysis. In our letter dated August 28, 1997, WSA addressed the Mall traffic issue:which had been raised at the August Planning Commission Workshop for the project.. In this lefter,:WSA states that the Temecula Mall development would add an increment of traffic to the interchange area roadways which was not specifically called out in .the original EIR: traffic. stu. dy;... :This statement should .be clarified' to say that the added Mall traffic was not id:e'n'~ed"!~'~p~:"ffi~:aiiy'r, as a component of the forecasted traffic but the. analysis included an assumption of growth in background traffic.equal .to 2.1 .percent compounded annually. This.generalltraffic,.gro_w:th assumption was intended to account for increases in area traffic related to ongoing and future development' pr0}'~cis.' Although' 'the Temeeula Mall project was not' identified sp-eeifii:aliy,'tthe. compounded ..tr. af, fie growth~.assumption.'is. intended .,to, compensate. for .traffic. increases. related to area development projects Such as the Mall, '" comments" letter dated September' 21, 1997. The estimated reductions in peak hour trips associated with revised Westside Specific Plan project discussed in this letter would further reduce the increment of traffic added by the Mall at the Rancho California Road/I-15 ,. interchange. ALI~NY. I',H' · ANAHBM, CA · ATLA/~A, GA · CAIi'aD. EGYPT ·CHARt. ESI'ON, SC. COLUIV'I~A, SC · COL~, OH'- DES MOINES. LA · FAI.~ CHURCH. VA · HC}NG KCNG HOUSTON, TX * KI"~XVILLE, TN · LEXINGTON, KY * LONDON, EN~ND e'MILWAUKEE, Wte NEW HAVEN, CT * OAK1..AJ'~. CA · OfiLA~, R, * Pfl'I~U~, PA * RALBGH, NC RICHMOND, VA ,* ROSELLE, JL * SAN FRANCISCO, CA, SAN JOSE, CA · SlNGAPOr'~, TALL~,HASSEE, FL · fAMPA; I:L · TORONTO, CANADA · WASHINGTON; DC EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY Matth¢~v Fagan October 1, 1997 Page 2 -WILBUR SMITH, ASSOCIATES In addition, it is. also relevant to note that the Westside..Specific. Plan. EIR included. a City/General Plan Build-Out Scenario Traffic Study which addressed long-term project impacts and ultimate area' circulation needs. This analysis essentially resulted in the defirfifi'0n"of circulation system improvements needed to accommodate the cumulative traffic conditions' which-would result from build out' of the ori .ginally defined.Westside "Specific 'Plan. as wellas the remaining undeveloped portions of the City. The build-out scenario-traffic analysis includes full implementation of the Temecula Regional Center. We hope that this added information helps clarify the issue of traffic impacts related.· to the Temecffia Mall; Should you have any qugstions concerning our fm'din. g..s; pi'e.'i:~ei:c:0"~'/i~':~:~'.me' . . · (714) 978-8110. / , Sincerely, ~VILB~ SMITH ASSOCIATES Robert A. Davis Principal. Transportation Engineer VISUAL SIMULATIONS R:\STAFFRPT~298PA97.PCI 10/2/97 vgw 18 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 EXHIBITS R:\$TAFFR.IrF~92PA9'7.PC1 12110197 tn, 36 CITY OF TEMECULA PHASE PROJECT $~TE PROPERLY' L~OUNOAt~ Y ...... ' PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA $P EXHIBIT B -ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) & SP (SPECIFIC PLAN) VL. L.M EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: BP (BUSINESS PARK) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA I ! i I ! 11 II PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT D SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT E PLAZA PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PHASE I APPROVED PLANTING PA #97-0298 ACCESS ROAD PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT F LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES PHASE I APPROVED PLANTING PA t~97-029§ APPROVED PLANTING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT F LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER lS, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 ICONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA Illlllllllll PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITI EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE-DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE. DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXH~S~T G ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA ~,~,' \LL SECTION A FLOOR P[ :\N PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT H TYPICAL ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA \VALL .~L(_'TIO'~ .\ · ENLARGED PARIIAL ELEVATIONF-3 mFI:FRE~;('I: ",V,\LI. Y,E£'TI( ~N B FI .~)OP, t PLAN ,,,~,, ,.~,. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXH~mT H TYPICAL ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) EXHIBIT H TYPICAL ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1997 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES (DECEMBER 15, 1997) R:\gTAFFRPT~9'2PAg'7.CC1 12/23/97 mf 32 DRAFT Commenting on concerns expressed by neighboring residents with regard to traffic on Pala Road, staff elaborated on the proposal to redesignate the front portion of three of the four parcels as Neighborhood Commercial (noting that the fourth parcel is already zoned Neighborhood Commercial) and to redesignate the rear portion of all four parcels as Service Commercial. For aesthetic purposes, Vice Chairwoman Slaven relayed her support with the above- mentioned proposal. Expressing a concern with regard to the level of traffic on Pala Road, Commissioner Guerriero requested that this matter be continued to a future meeting so that the Commission may obtain additional information with regard to future traffic impacts. For Commissioner Guerriero, Senior Planner Hogan commented on the Pala Road extension and its impact on Parcel No. 1. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to continue Planning Application No. PA97-0237 to the January 5, 1997, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present (Chairwoman Fahey absent and Commissioner Soltysiak abstained). At 7:44 P.M., a short recess was taken with the Commission reconvening at 7:54 P.M. 7. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 {CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) Planning Commission consideration to design, construct, and operate a total of 203,300 square feet of retail, restaurant, arcades, theaters, and shops and associated improvements (hardscape, parking, and landscaping) on 16.5 acres. RECOMMENDATION It was recommended that the Planning Commission approve the request. By way of a color rendering, Associate Planner Fagan reviewed, in detail, the site plan, landscape plan, elevation, architecture, environmental issues, and traffic and parking analyses for the proposed project, advising that the project encompasses three components -- a parking area located to the north, a parking area located to the south, and the core area. He advised that the proposed billboards will be utilized as architectural features and will only be for internal use of the project. Because the applicant must comply with the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, he suggested the imposition of a condition to ensure compliance. Planning Commission December 15, 1997 DRAFT For Commissioner Guerriero, Principal Engineer Parks advised that the City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the traffic analysis completed by Wilbur Smith and Associates and concurred with the conclusion that once the proposed improvements are completed, lower SR 79 will remain at service level "D," Mr. Zev Buffman, applicant, 41893 Main Street, announced that the anticipated opening date will be early summer of 1999, giving the Entertainment Center and the Old Town merchants ample time to plan for the year 2000 celebrations. Mr. Buffman extended appreciation and commendation to staff and the Planning Commissioners for their efforts associated with this project. Relaying his parents' greetings and Happy Holiday wishes, Mr. Roy Rogers, Jr., Victorville, informed the Commissioners and the audience members that RogersDale USA is a family- operated business, not a corporation; commented on the attributes of the City which attracted his family to the City of Temecula; advised that the architecture of this project will depict 100 years of California architectural history; noted that the Center will provide entertainment along with educational opportunities; and stated that this Center will not be a gated-iron park. Mr. Rogers clarified that each billboard would be themed after the building with which it is associated and that each building will architecturally reflect a specific period in time. Mr. Richard Busenkell, 31556 Loma Linda Road, Vice President of Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Museum, advised that he was not speaking on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Museum and proceeded with an informative historical overview as to why the City of Temecula would be the appropriate location for a Western Entertainment Complex and encouraged the Planning Commissioners to approve the request. Speaking in opposition to the project, Mr. Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, referenced his letter of December 15, 1997 (copies were provided to the Planning Commissioners as well as for the record). With regard to the finances of this project, Ms. Pat Keller, 39201 Salinas Drive, Murrieta, expressed concern with how this project may impact the resident of the City of Temecula if it were to not succeed and requested that the City reveal safeguards that have been undertaken to ensure financial protection to the residents of the City in the event of a failure. Speaking in support of this project, Ms. Joan Sparkman, 30554 San Pasqual Road, encouraged the Commissioners to approve the development. Mr. Ed Dool, 41920 Sixth Street, representing the Temecula Stage Stop and approximately 100 other local Old Town merchants and property owners, relayed his dismay with the fact that Mr. Pratt, considering his opposition to the project, would depart the meeting early and not stay to listen to other residents' comments as well as additional staff/Commission clarification. Mr. Dool expressed his support of the project and encouraged the Commission to approve it. Planning Commission December 15, 1997 DRAFT Because, in his opinion, the proposed project would meet the needs of balanced economic growth in the City of Temecula as well as the Temecula Valley, Mr. Dennis Frank, 27475 Ynez Road, noted that the proposed development will be consistent with the General and Specific Plans; will be beneficial to the needs of Old Town, the merchants of Old Town, the merchants of Temecula, as well as Southwest Riverside County; advised that it will exceed the minimum requirements of the Specific Plan; and stated that it will promote family values. Being of the opinion that no subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report would be necessary, Mr. Frank encouraged the Commission to approve the project. Readdressing the Planning Commissioners, Mr. Roy Rogers, Jr. reiterated that RogersDale USA is a family-operated business; that the family intends to expand on the City's history throughout the Center; that the proposed stores of the Center will not be in competition with existing stores of the City; and that each store operator will be handpicked and will not be a corporate business. With regard to Condition No. 28f. (pertaining to landscaping), Principal Engineer Parks, for Commissioner Guerriero, stated that the condition will be clarified to ensure optimal visibility and site distance. Although walking paths to the Center from Old Town will not be feasible because of the steepness of the hill, Commissioner Guerriero requested that adequate public transportation be provided from the project to Old Town and/or Old Town to the project. Mr. Guerriero commended those individuals that have worked on this project and relayed his support of the request. With regard to the color samples of the proposed stucco colors, Commissioner Guerriero requested that actual stucco colors be provided versus color photographs. Relative to the parking area, core area, landscaping, site plan, and signage, no Commission objections were noted. Relative to elevations, architectural exceptions, and height of proposed buildings, no Commission objections were noted. By way of a model, Mr. Randy Fleming, 43500 Ridge Park Drive, briefly elaborated on the architectural features of building "D." Having addressed his traffic concerns with Principal Engineer Parks and thereby obtaining a better understanding, Commissioner Miller noted that a venue of this caliber will create some traffic for the City but that the benefits derived from such a venue will greatly outweigh its associated traffic challenges. ]0 Planning Commission December 15, 1997 DRAFT Having previously served on the Transportation and Public Safety Commission, Commissioner Guerriero expressed dismay with the issue that not more individuals attended those Commission meetings in order to express their traffic concerns at an early planning stage but opt to express traffic issues/concerns at the very last minute. He noted that numerous traffic studies have been completed by legitimate traffic engineering companies; that extensive efforts have been undertaken to ensure that those traffic conditions/concerns, as inherited from the County, have been mitigated. In closing, Mr. Guerriero echoed the comments made by Commissioner Miller, noting that in comparison to other cities, the City of Temecula does not have traffic problems. Commenting on the tremendous amount of hours staff has expended on this project and the amount of extensive review, Vice Chairwoman Slaven advised that financial issues with regard to this project or any other project do not fall under the purview of the Planning Commission. She reiterated that specific traffic concerns will be addressed by the construction of the Western Bypass; viewed this project as superior to the one presented in 1995; and relayed her support of it. MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved to close the public hearing; to make a determination of consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified; and to adopt Resolution No. 97-041. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval (Chairwoman Fahey absent and Commissioner Soltysiak abstained)). PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0392 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TOTAL OF 203,300 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, RESTAURANT, ARCADES, THEATERS AND SHOPS AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING) ON 16.5 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA (100 FEET WEST OF PUJOL STREET), 700 FEET SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE/VINCENT MORAGA DRIVE AND EAST OF THE ClTY'S WESTERN BORDER, WITHIN THE WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-013, 940-310-044, 940-310-045, 940- 310-047, 940-310-048, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320-003 PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT A. Because the Commission's January 19, 1998, meeting will fall on a holiday (Martin Luther King, Jr. Day), it was the consensus of the Commission that if a second meeting in January were necessary, it be scheduled on Monday, January 26, 1998. B. In response to Planning Manager Ubnoske, Commissioner Guerriero offered to serve on the Committee discussing the Adult Business Ordinance. ]! Planning Commission December 15, 1997 ITEM 18 Ronald H. Roberts Mayor Steven J. Ford Mayor Pro-Tem Jeff Comerchero Councilmember Karel F. Lindemans Councilmember Jeffrey E. Stone Councilmember (909) 506-5100 FAX 694.-6499 January 13, 1998 Bob Buster, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 Dear Chairman Buster: The City of Temecula is strongly opposed to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) December 10th decision based on "return to source" funding. This opposition is based not only on Temecula's concern regarding the change in the allocation formula, but also on the fact that we were not notified of, or given the opportunity to comment on, this formula change. RCTC has the responsibility, as the lead agency in allocating transportation funding in the County, to make decisions that are equitable to all. From the information we received, T emecula believes that we were not given the opportunity to participate in this policy decision that affects our area. Therefore, we are requesting representation on a task force that will not only review the "return to source" funding policy change, but also review the status of Measure A funding and the list of Measure A projects. For the record, Temecula receives back approximately 25% of our City Measure A contributions, and this alone should underscore the need for Temecula representation on any RCTC policy decisions. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the entire Temecula City Council. Ron Roberts Mayor I~RO BERTS R~L ETFER S'~RCTC-RE P.RE S th