The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About022608 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title I I] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE FEBRUARY 26, 2008 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. Next in Order: Ordinance: 08-02 Resolution: 08-23 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: To be announced Invocation: Pastor John Ruhlman of Life Church Flag Salute: Council Member Washington ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar Temecula Reads I Temecula Writes Proclamation Can Do Day Proclamation Presentation to Exchange Students Traveling to our Sister City Leidschendam-Voorburg PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar ar ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed an the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters an the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five minute {5}time limit for individual speakers CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council an matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10} minutes will be devoted to these reports CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 22, 2008. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approval of 2007-08 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 4.2 Adapt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 5 Second Amendment to Contract with Meyer & Associates RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the second amendment to the agreement with Meyer & Associates in the amount of $47,540, plus 10% contingency of $4,754. 6 Acceptance of a Utility Easement Deed and Grant Deeds for Open Space Lots RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed for Open Space Lot 75 of Tract 24188 known as Meadows Park and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the grant deed to be recorded; 6.2 Authorize acceptance of the Utility Easement Deed for Open Space Lat 79 of Tract 24188 and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the easement deed to be recorded; 6.3 Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed of Open Space Lots 11 and 12 of Tract 31344 and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the deed to be recorded. 7 Second Amendment to the Animal Shelter JPA Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the Second Amendment to the JPA Agreement relating to the Southwest County Animal Shelter. 8 Resolution Supporting Governor Schwarzenegger's Continued Funding of Proposition No. 98 at current levels to benefit California's Students (at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Maryann Edwards RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVIECULA RESOLUTION SUPPORTING GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER'S CONTINUED FUNDING OF PROPOSITION NO. 98 AT CURRENT LEVELS TO BENEFIT CALIFORNIA'S STUDENTS 9 Amendment No. 2 to Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Joint Powers Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Joint Powers Agreement. 10 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - FY 2007-08, Project No. PWOS-01 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - FY 2007-08, Project No. PW08-01. 11 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Slurry Seal Protect - FY 2007-0$, Paloma del Sol Area, Protect No. PWO$-02 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Slurry Seal Project FY 2007-08, Paloma del Sal Area, Project No. PW08-02. 12 Reimbursement of Development Impact Fees pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.06.200 (BRSC, LLC; Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center and Self Storage; Parcel Map No. 33545) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the BRSC, LLC Reimbursement of Development Impact Fees {DIF) between the City of Temecula and BRSC, LLC, in the amount of $189,570.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 13 Parcel Map No. 33421, Temecula Corporate Center RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 33421 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 13.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Cash Deposit as security for the agreement. 14 Proposition 1 B (Transportation Bond} Allocations and Funding Proposals RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the attached Prapositian 1 B Local Streets and Roads Funding Propasals list for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and Fiscal Year 2008-09 and authorize staff to apply to the State Department of Finance for release of $1,575,218 in Proposition 1 B funds for these projects; 14.2 Amend the approved FY 2007-08 Public Works Maintenance Division Budget far Citywide Street Maintenance to reflect $750,000 of Proposition 1 B funding. 15 Official Map, Old Town Civic Center Properties RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL MAP AND SUBDIVIDING PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 AND 20 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE TOWN OF TEMECULA IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16 First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with AEI-CASC Engineering for Water Quality Management Plan MIQMP) Plan Check and Business Inspection Services RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with AEI- CASC Engineering in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Plan Check and Business Inspection Services, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment to the Agreement. 17 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Lagoon Investigation Order -Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Watershed Permittees RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the Memorandum of Agreement with the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City for the amount of $59,322. 18 Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements, Protect No. PW99-11 Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Project; 18.2 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-11, Pechanga Parkway Phase I I Street Improvements contingent an the City receiving Construction Authorization from the Federal Highway Administration {FHWA}. 19 First Amendment to Security Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Approve the First Amendment with Securitas Security Services USA in an additional amount of $14,000 far security services at Fire Station 95; 19.2 Approve the First Amendment with Securitas Security Services USA to include a term extension through March 31, 2008. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two {2} minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" farm should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five {5} minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address far the record. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 20 Minutes RECOMMENDATION 20.1 Approve the minutes of February 12, 2008 21 Approval of 2007-0$ Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adapt a resalutian entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 20Q7-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET CSD BUSINESS 22 Temecula Youth Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Approve in its substantial form the Temecula Youth Master Plan. CSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 23 Community Services Department Monthly Report CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency an items that are not listed an the agenda ar on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2} minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item nat on the agenda or on the Cansent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five {5} minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" farm to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 24 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Approve the minutes of February 12, 2008. 25 Approval of 2007-08 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2407-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS 26 Letter of Support for Highland Property Development's acquisition of the Oak Tree Apartments RECOMMENDATION: 2fi.1 Authorize the Executive Director to issue a Letter of Support for Highland Property Development's acquisition of the Oak Tree Apartments for affordable housing purposes. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 27 Redevelopment Departmental Monthly Report RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing ar may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s~ at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing 28 Planning Application No. PA06-0340, a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to correctly designate existing uses, to identify water courses as Open Space areas, minimize "split" land use designations by correcting mapping errors, revise Specific Plan Land Use designations based on recorded map date; and, to amend the Community Design Element's Chaparral Policy Area to remove certain grading constraints which are mitigated under the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conversation Plan RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP BY IDENTIFYING THE USES ESTABLISHED IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, TO IDENTIFY WATER COURSES AS OPEN SPACE AREAS, MINIMIZE "SPLIT' LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BY CORRECTING MAPPING ERRORS, AND REVISE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USES BASED ON RECORDED MAP DATA 28.2 Adopt a resolution entitled RESOLUTION 0$- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT CHAPARRAL POLICY AREA TO REMOVE CERTAIN GRADING CONSTRAINTS WHICH ARE MITIGATED UNDER THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 29 Planning Department Monthly Report 30 City Council Travel/Conference Report -January 2008 31 Economic Development Department Activity Report for the month of January 32 Police Department Monthly Report 33 Buildina and Safety Monthly Department Report 34 Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council Regular, Tuesday, March 18, 2008, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 10 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS U N i.~, ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ,~ o ,~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U ~ F U ~ p 1) ~ ~ c~ N U 'd N ~'' ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~; ~ p . ,-r W ~ e ~i n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ V~ U xi ,~ ~ ~ ~ N r'' -+-~ p ~,j 'r~ Uj sN-r 0 +~ a> / " '~ ~' ~ ~ ~ , ~ 'C3 N c3 ~ ~, W ~ ~ ~ ~ AV M, ~ N ~ ~ '~" N p ~ ~ .~ ~ r+-r r--~ ~ ~ ct3 ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ Q ~ ° ~~ A n ~ N '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bA [~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C j 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~" ~y c~ 0 ~ cti '~ '~ ~' y O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~i ~ ~ ~ ,~ -~ ~ U p • ,-, cu . ~ ~i "~ ,~ ,~ p ~ U ~ H H N .~ ~N ~ N n p ~ r " f~-~ .s~ 'd,~ H ~ ~ ~ U ~ p Cr3 ~ d .~ U ,~ ~ ~, r_'' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~, ~ o to ~ 'd ,~ p ~' ~ N 0 v' p N F ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ N "d Fr-I ' N W . ~ MWM 0 ~ MWM ~ ~ ~ ~.~I ~ ~ ~ ~ U W W . ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~i ~ U t~ ~ .-i ~ N "r' U ~ .~ ~ ~ O ~ ,~ ~ ' ` O U ~ +~ r-+ r~/~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ G ^' " ~ ~ r~/~ vy, chi o QQ G~ N ~ ~ .C.~'' U' 'u'9 ~'~ ~ ~ E~ ~ °~'H ~ c~a U ~ °' ..o U '" ~ ° s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ v ~w r ° ~ ° ^ ~ j, ~ ~ . ~ ,~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~o ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ N ~ bA ~ ~ ~ N ~ ,.~"' rte. ~ ~ a~i ~ n ~ N rn ` ~1 ~ '~ ° -rs o ~ ~ ~ `" ' o ~ o _~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ to ~~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ " o ~ v Q ~ ~: ,~ ~ v bb E ~, ~ W '-' j, U ~ ~ ~ . o V ~ -' ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ Qj ~ ~ a ~ o so• O H ~ ~ ~, ~ y ° ° U ~ _ ~ o . ~ _ o ~"~I ~ o ~ ~ U ~ ~ a, w o ~ ~ ' •~ ~ cd ~ a i y ~ v F-' ~ o ~ ~ ~ o E-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E N ~ ,.°o c~ tis ~ ~ ~ ~ Ey ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ y ~ r 'V ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b Z .}, ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~' ,may a~i 3 't3 * ~ 'C ~ ' U y a3 -~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~^, .~ ~ 4" ~ U 4--i ~ Q O ~ '1 ~ 4-i ""' ~ ~ p ~ ' ~ 'G~ , ,~ ~ U v~ ~w~v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ . ~ ~„ ~ ~ ~ w ~ O ~ v ~ _~ ~ '~ ~~ o o °' ~ w ~ ~ ~C ~C ~ ~ -'~ ~ ~ ~ , -~ ~; ~ x a~ a a~, ~x~~ ~ ~ x~ w x w~ x ~ ~w :~~~ x ~ ~ ~~ ~ w~ U ~ ~ ~ ~~~_~ Q ~ S° z `~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ cn ° CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NCB. 1 ITEM NCB. 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 22, 2008 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:15 p.m. and its regular meeting commenced at 7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, January 22, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: Council Members: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington and Mayor Naggar Absent: Council Members: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Danny and Elizabeth Hahn I NVOCATIO N The invocation was provided by Pastor John Wells of Mountain View Community Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Mayor Pro Tem Edwards. National Wear Red Dav Proclamation In recognition of the importance of the ongoing fight against heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular diseases far women, Mayor Naggar proclaimed Friday, February 1, 2008 to be National Wear Red Day. Certificates of Achievement to the Temecula Golden Bruins Honoring the undefeated Temecula Golden Bruins and their win in the Palomar Conference Championship, Mayor Naggar presented the following individuals with a Certificate of Rchievement.~ • Jake Aguayo • Patric Areyan • Vernon Arias • Ryan Brownfield • Drew Cowman • Paul Davis • Felicisimo Dizon • Daniel Duvall • Wyatt Ehrherdt • Corey Eisler • Dillon Emery • Cameron Gamble • Jordan Gardner R:IM i n utes1012208 • Daniel Gay • Hayden Hensley • Rashid Jones • Brendon Marchand • Kellen Mataafa • Sean Pferschy • Williams Ranos • Donovan Sagon • Michael Sanchez • Taylor Schafer • Ryan Smith • Jason Sourille • Chris Stratton • Matthew 5troder • Jonathan Touzinsky • Tom Touzinsky, Head Coach • Billy Brownfield, Assistant Coach • Bobby Gardner, Assistant Coach • Dennis Marchand, Assistant Coach • Rich Mataafa, Assistant Coach • Cary Morgan, Assistant Coach • Joe Ranos, Assistant Coach PUBLIC COMMENT A. Expressing concern with the Press Enterprise's credibility, Mr. David Neaut, Temecula, relayed his approval of the City Council's decision with respect to the Press Enterprise. B. Ms. Julie Gilbert, Murrieta, relayed her concern with the adult material that will be shown in the Vagina Monologues production at the Old Town Community Theater, and read some examples of the productions language. C. Ms. Bridget Blanton, Temecula, protested the Vagina Monologue production, Hating that this play distorts the sexuality of men and women. D. Commenting on the Vagina Monologue production, Ms. Adele Harrison, Temecula, relayed the inappropriateness of the Old Town Community Theater's exhibition of this type of production. E. Ms. Christine Welsh, Murrieta, also relayed her apposition to the Vagina Monologue production. F. Ms. Gladys Ernst, Temecula, relayed the inappropriateness of the Theater allowing children to view the production of the Vagina Monologue. G. Concurring with the comments made by speakers with respect to the Vagina Monologue production, Mr. Rick Reiss, Temecula, stated that the production would only create negative affects on the community, and that the residents of Temecula should not have to be exposed to this type of material. R:IMinutes1012208 2 H. Mr. Chris Pedersen, Temecula, relayed his dismay with the Press Enterprise and its ability to not provide pertinent information to residents as it would relate to news reports within the City. CITY MANAGER REPORT Addressing the issue of the Press Enterprise working with the City to ensure accuracy and effective flow of communication, City Manager Nelson stated the following: • That he was directed by the City Council to meet with the Editor of the Press Enterprise in an effort to improve the communication process along with the recommendation of discussing the feasibility of forming an ethics panel to create a public forum in order to review disputed articles an an on-going basis • That on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, he, along with Assistant City Manager Adams, met with the Editor of the Press Enterprise, Ms. Maria De Varenne, two other editors, and Mr. Mel Opatowski, to discuss issues of concern • That at this meeting, there was minimal discussion regarding errors that have been made by the Press Enterprise and no discussion pertaining to blatant omission of facts; that with respect to the noted errors, it was the Press Enterprise's position that if an error were made, a correction, if necessary, would be printed; that with regard to the four errors discussed at the January 8, 2008, City Council meeting, assurance was given by the representative of the Press Enterprise that the City would receive in writing, documentation of written corrections from the Press Enterprise by Friday, January 18, 2008; and that to date, the City has not received any written documentation regarding those particular corrections • That with respect to blatant omission of facts, the City has not received ~ response from the Editor regarding these issues; but that the City was advised that it would have the right to write an editorial of the City's opinion with respect to any corrections or concerns in the opinion section of the Press Enterprise • That the Press Enterprise was not willing to have any discussion with the City with regard to blatant omission of facts • That the Press Enterprise made no attempt to justify why it was of the opinion that its articles were fair and balanced • That the Press Enterprise had no desire in the formation of an ethics panel • That the City advised the Press Enterprise that the concept of establishing an ethics panel would be to allow an independent objective panel to weigh in on issues of concern and provide feedback and input that would improve the overall working relationship between the City and the Press Enterprise; and that unequivocally, the Editor stated that the Press Enterprise would not be interested in participating in the formation of an ethics panel • That in summary, the City advised the Editor of the Press Enterprise that in future articles, the City will submit in writing issues and points that would be most important to the City as it would relate to items that the Press covers in the City of Temecula; and that if errors or blatant omission of facts were to occur in the future, the City would reserve the right to cover the articles under City Council reports and/or City Council agenda to ensure that the citizens of Temecula are informed of all facts that pertain to its City. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Thanking those who sent well wishes, Council Member Roberts relayed his enthusiasm with being able to attend this evening's City Council meeting. R:IMinutes1012208 3 B. Mayor Naggar advised that although the attorney representing the Press Enterprise assured the Council that the Press Enterprise would pledge that its story would be the truth, it was made clear in an article written after the January 8, 2008, City Council meeting, that this would not be the case. Mayor Naggar also noted that the City Council will address each blatant omission of important facts andlor corrections to its residents as they arise. Referencing sub-prime loans and foreclosures, Mayor Naggar advised that he had met Senator Boxer and Mayors of other cities, at a roundtable meeting, to discuss pending and passed legislation that will assist families that are facing foreclosures and to address loans that will become problematic; relayed points of view pertaining to maintenance of foreclosed homes and what cites can do to prevent blight in the community. Mayor Naggar requested that staff contact the office of Senator Boxer to further attain information with respect to pending legislation regarding foreclosures and options that residents may have; and noted that he would be hopeful of holding a town hall meeting to educate citizens of their options. With respect to an annexation to the southwest part of town, Mayor Naggar also requested that staff return with an update pertaining to its status at a future City Council meeting. Commenting on the Vagina Monologue production, Mayor Naggar requested that a policy with respect to community standards be implemented. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with GM Business Interiors for the Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center -Phase II, Project No. PW03-06 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the First Amendment to a Purchase and Installation Agreement with GM Business Interiors, in the amount of $9,335.44 far the Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. R:1Mi n utest012208 4 4 Approve the Sponsorship Request for the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Apprave the 2008 Temecula Spring Rad Run Sponsarship Agreement with P & R Foundation and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. 5 Declaration Terminating the Local State of Emergency RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING TERMINATION OF THE LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY THAT HAD BEEN DECLARED ON DECEMBER 11, 2007 BY RESOLUTION NO. 07-105 6 Approval of the FY 2008-09 Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board Annual Report and Declaration of Intention to Levy an Assessment Against RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT {TVTBID} 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT {TVTBID} FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF 7 2008 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve a contract with Travelers Insurance Company, as the City's new Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier for 2008; for an estimated premium cost of $312,280, which begins an February 1, 2008. R:IM i n utes1012208 8 Expenditure Authorization for Theater Ticketing Software Services RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize additional payments of up to $20,000 with Vision One for ticketing software services at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater for a total contract authorization of $50,000. MOTION: Council Member Washington moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Mayor Pro Tem Edwards seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:54 p.m., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency. At 8:01 p. m., the City Council resumed with regular business. PUBLIC HEARING 15 Certify a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Adopt Statements of Overriding Consideration, Approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Plan, Tentative Parcel Maq. and Conditional Use Permit for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project RECOMMENDATION 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY {HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07- 0201, PA07-0202) R:IM i n utes1012208 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REMOVE EIGHT SUBJECT PARCELS FROM THE Z "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN" OVERLAY DESIGNATION AND CORRESPONDING TWO STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR A SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY {HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198) 15.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 08-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY {PDO-8} TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY-9 {PDO-9} AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.200 THROUGH 17.22.206, TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 {PA07-0199) 15.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ESTABLISH A 320-BED HOSPITAL FACILITY AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HELIPAD FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY {HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH}, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959 080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0202} 15.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL, A HELIPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY {HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0200) R:IM i n utes1012208 15.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 32468, TO CONSOLIDATE EIGHT LOTS TOTALING 35.31 ACRES INTO ONE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH}, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0201) By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Papp highlighted on the following: • Project Description • Planning Applications • Project Processing History • Court Ruling • Supplemental EIR Content • Land Use and Zoning • Conditional Use Permits • Development Plan • Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Supplemental EIR • Supplemental EIR MTBE Plume • Supplemental EIR -Construction Noise • Supplemental EIR -Siren Noise • Supplemental EIR -Traffic • Supplemental EIR -Traffic Mitigation • Supplemental EIR -Future Traffic Conditions • New Alternative Site • New Alternative Site TEC • Alternative Site Not Considered • Environmentally Superior Alternative • EIR Processing • January 9, 2008 Planning Commission • Recommendation • Agenda Packet Changes In response to Cauncil Member Washington's query, Senior Papp stated that the applicant would be required to submit applications to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA} as it would pertain to the location of the helipad, operations, and flight approach; and advised that the preliminary plans have been reviewed by the appropriate agencies and no comments were given. For Council Member Washington, Senior Planner Papp noted that staff did not analyze potential restrictions if the helipad site were relocated to another site on the property. R:1Mi n utest012208 8 Senior Planner Papp advised that Mr. Rhodes' property would be zoned Planned Development Overlay-8. Mr. Popp also noted that it would be his understanding that only issues that were originally raised at a previous public hearing could be raised again, unless there was something new and substantial that would potentially have a significant, negative affect on the project. With respect to the supplemental EIR, City Attorney Thorson advised that the only issues previously brought up and addressed could be brought forward for inquiry. Director of Community Services Parker advised that the construction timing of the proposed trail along the hospital area to Rancho California Road has not been determined at this time. Mayor Naggar requested that the timing of the trail along the hospital project be constructed in unison with the hospital project. At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed. Speaking in full support of the proposed project, Council Member Washington thanked staff and the applicant for their diligence with the proposed project. Relaying the importance of a hospital in the City, Council Member Roberts noted his full support. Echoing previous comments, Council Member Comerchero commended staff and the applicant far its efforts and relayed his support. Council Member Edwards expressed her excitement and approval of the proposed project. Mr. Scott Crane, applicant, advised that he would be hopeful of breaking ground in 2Q08. MOTION: Council Member Comerchero moved to approve Item Nos. 15.1 and 15.2. Council Member Edwards seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time, City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 08-01. MOTION: Council Member Washington moved to approve Item No. 15.3. Council Member Roberts seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Council Member Washington moved to approve Item Nos. 15.4, 15.5, and 15.6. Council Member Comerchero seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. R:IMinutes1012208 9 16 Planning Application No. PA07-0316, A Maior Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0316, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PA07-0118 (PROMENADE MALL) TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RING ROAD INCLUDING SITE MODIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ADDITIONAL ALL-WAY STOPS, ACCESS RECONFIGURATION, MODIFIED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE, AND AISLE CLOSURES WITH ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS Director of Public Works Hughes provided a staff report (of record). For the Council, Public Traffic Safety Chairperson Arbogast relayed that the ring road enhancement plan was reviewed by the Commission. Director of Public Works Hughes advised that because the ring road would be a private road, it was not necessary for the Public Traffic Safety Commission to review the ring road plan. In response to Mayor Naggar's question, Planning Commission Chairperson Telesio relayed that the Commission was in full support of the proposed project. At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed. Council Member Comerchero commended Forest City, staff, and the subcommittees for its hard work and dedication to the project. Relaying his excitement towards the improvements to the ring road, Council Member Washington also relayed his full support of the proposed project. MOTION: Council Member Washington moved to approve staff recommendation. Council Member Roberts seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. R:IMinutes1012208 10 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 17 Selection of City Council Committee Assignments RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: Commission Liaison (One Member) Community Services Commission Old Town Local Review Board Planning Commission PubliclTraffic Safety Commission Appointed Member Comerchero Washington Naggar Edwards 17.2 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Standing Committees: Standing Committees Economic Development RDAlOId Town Steering Committee Finance Committee Infrastructure Beautification Committee Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee Murrieta/Temecula Committee Public Works/Facilities Committee Medical Task Force Committee Appointed Members Washington, Roberts Roberts, Edwards Edwards, Naggar Edwards, Naggar Edwards, Washington Naggar, Washington Edwards, Roberts Naggar 17.3 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Representative Assignments (External Organizations): Representative Assignments (External Organizations} Animal Shelter LiaisonlJPA Representative League of California Congress {2008 Voting Delegate} Murrieta Creek Advisory Board National League of Cities Annual Congress {2008 Voting Delegate} Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Riverside County Child Safety Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative Edwards) Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors WRCOG Representative RCA Representative Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG} Appointed Members Edwards Naggar, (Alternate Edwards) Edwards Naggar, (Alternate Edwards) Roberts, (Alternate Naggar) Edwards Roberts, (Alternate Comerchero) Comerchero, (Alternate Roberts Washington, (Alternate Roberts) EdWardS (Alternate Washington) Washington, (Alternate Edwards: R:1Mi n utest012208 11 17.4 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Ad Hoc Subcommittees: Ad Hoc Subcommittees {Can be one or two members) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee External Communications Ad Hoc Subcommittee Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee Homeless Shelter Ad Hoc Subcammittee Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee Military Ad Hoc Subcommittee Nicolas Valley Ad Hoc Subcommittee Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Promenade Mall Ad Hac Subcommittee Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee Raripaugh Ranch Ad Hoc Subcammittee San Diego State University Visitor's Center Ad Hoc Subcammittee Santiago & Ynez Property Ad Hac Subcammittee Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee Transit Ad Hac Subcammittee Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Subcommittee Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Youth Master Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee Appointed Members Edwards, Naggar Naggar, Washington Comerchero, Edwards Naggar, Washington Washington, Edwards Washington, Roberts Washington, Edwards Roberts, Washington Comerchero, Roberts Comerchero, Washington Edwards, Naggar Comerchero, Roberts Roberts, Naggar Edwards, Roberts Comerchero, Naggar Roberts, Comerchero Edwards, Roberts Comerchero, Edwards Naggar, Washington MOTION: Council Member Washington moved to approve the appointments as noted above. Council Member Comerchero seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 18 Planning Department Monthly Reports for November and December 2007 19 Economic Development Department Monthly Reports for November and December 2007 20 Building and Safety Department Monthly Reports for November and December 2007. 21 Police Department Monthly Report 22 Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT This report was addressed on page 3. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT With respect to closed session, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council provided direction to staff for continued negotiations with respect to real estate negotiations for the Diaz Road property; and that with respect to labor negotiations, the City Council provided direction to staff for the various employee organizations. R:1Mi n utest012208 12 ADJOURNMENT At 8:56 p.m. the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 12, 2008, at 5:30 p. m. for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:1Mi n utes1012208 13 ITEM NCB. 3 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Leah Thomas, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA QOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $6,475,171.80. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Mike Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02/07/2008 TOTAL CHECK RUN 02/14/2008 TOTAL CHECK RUN 02/07/2008 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: $ 3,573,688.59 2,419,940.43 481,542.78 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/262008 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 6,475,171.80 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 1,635,431.32 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 302,559.61 165 RDA LOW/MOD - 20% SET ASIDE 310,772.09 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 244,638.37 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 63,910.02 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE 8,245.75 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSEBECYCLING 2,542,862.40 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R 1,510.00 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 8,418.10 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 10,891.19 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 592,006.07 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -CIP PROJECT 11,584.64 300 INSURANCE FUND 6,529.58 310 VEHICLES FUND 57,252.14 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 58,535.44 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,361.01 340 FACILITIES 18,938.07 477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 117,183.22 $ 5,993,629.02 001 GENERAL FUND $ 321,538.94 165 RDA LOW/MOD - 20% SET ASIDE 5,663.53 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 104,204.26 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 123.38 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE 5,107.05 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 792.49 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 594.13 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 341.78 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -CIP PROJECT 2,832.14 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,271.66 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 27,996.83 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,628.98 340 FACILITIES 7,447.61 481,542.78 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 6,475,171.80 apChkLst 02l07120D8 4:d7:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1DD1 02/04/2008 00546D U S BANK tax payment: CFD 03-2 117,183.22 117,183.22 1002 02/07/2008 ODD245 PERS -HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM PERS Health Admin Cost Payment 77,071.72 Blue Shield HMO Payment 0.00 77,071.72 1003 02/0712008 OD0444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 22,270.74 22,270.74 1004 02107/20D8 OD0283 INSTATAX (IRS) FederallncomeTaxesPayment 89,554.77 89,554.77 1005 021D7l20D8 D01065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 23,217.77 23,217.77 SOLUTION 1006 02107/2008 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 124,694.85 124,694.85 RETI REM ENT) 1007 02J07120D8 000389 U S C M WEST COBRA), OBRA-Project Retirement Payment 3,626.16 3,626.16 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 1008 02/07120D8 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE Child Care Reimbursement Payment 11,133.54 Child Care Reimbursement Payment 0.00 11,133.54 121847 02/07/2008 009604 12MILESOUT.COM video secs Council mtg DeclJan 1,500.00 1,5DD.00 121848 D2/07/2008 003552 A F L A G AFLAC Cancer Payment 3,538.42 3,538.42 121849 021D7120D8 011690 ACCURATE INDEX filing supplies: Police 176.00 176.00 121850 02/07120D8 009D1D ALEXANDER PACIFIC Electrical svcs: CRC 745.00 745.00 121851 02J07120D8 001587 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS Standard Drawings Vol.lll: PW 40.50 40.50 ASSN. 121852 0210712008 011746 ANGUINO AGUILAR, JUAN refund:security deposit CRC 1127 400.00 400.00 CARLOS 121853 021D7120D8 000101 APPLE ON E INC temp help ppe 1119 Ortiz, V. 702.55 temp help ppe 1119 Morrison, dawn 600.80 1,303.35 121854 02/07/2D08 011763 AQUIPORT! AMSDELL III LLC appraisal costs Pechanga Pkwy prj 3,000.00 3,ODO.OD 121855 02/07/2008 011747 ARNOLD, JEFF refund:ballroom dancing 3200.1 D2 22.4D 22.40 Page:i apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121856 02!0712008 OD1323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr Svcs: City Hall 459.64 Bottled wtr svcs: Maint Facility 160.02 Bottled wtr svcs: Library 105.57 Bottled wtr svcs: CRC 63.20 Bottled wtr svcs: Fld Op Ctr 62.02 Bottled wtr svcs: TV Museum 31.68 Bottled wtr svcs: PBSP 27.01 Bottled wtr svcs: Theater 24.85 Bottled wtr svcs: Children's Museum 20.42 Bottled wtr svcs: Aquatics 20.38 Bottled wtr svcs: City Council 18.40 Battled wtr svcs: TCG 10.65 Bottled wtr svcs: Aquatics 4.30 credit:bottled wtr svcs skate park -68.87 939.27 121857 02/0712008 011752 ASAN SOCIETY GROUP refund:security deposit CRC 1/19 400.00 400.00 121858 02!0712008 011755 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP refund:security deposit CRC 1129 150.00 150.00 121859 02/0712008 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN New Membership: Rosa, Charles 67.00 67.00 CALIF 121860 02/07/2008 011753 BARRON, MARTHA refund:Musical Theater-Brianna 9D.00 90.00 121861 02!0712008 DD3466 BASKETS & BALLOONS TOO! Econ Dv promo basket:MOM cf 141.38 141.38 121862 02/07/2008 002381 BEAUDOIN, LINDA Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 7D3.OD 121863 02J0712008 002541 BEGKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS silt removal:valleja Chan & santiaga 12,794.14 INC silt removal:vallejo chan & santiago 1,729.75 credit: billing adj 1/11/D8 -246.83 14,277.06 121864 02107!2008 D11028 BENTLEY, AMY refund: Kids Love Soccer-Logan 82.00 82.00 121865 02/0712008 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES DUI & Drug Screening: Police 693.00 693.00 121866 02/07/2008 005665 BLACK'S TOWING Police towing svcs: TE07D10265 510.00 Police towing svcs: TE07010265 34D.00 Police towing svcs: TE07010265 170.00 Police towing svcs: TE07152198 170.00 1,190.00 121867 02J07/2008 OD3222 BROCKMEIER, CAROL Retirement Medical Payment 690.26 690.26 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121868 02107/2008 011373 BURNS, SCOTT Reimb:Vericom ComputerTrng:1/16-18 287.13 287.13 121869 02/0712008 009047 BUTTERFIELD STATION ref:occ fee adj 32965 Tem Pkwy 435.58 435.58 121870 02/0712008 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 304.51 PW patch truck materials 269.90 574.41 121871 02/0712008 000924 CALIFASSOC OF PUBLIC 3108-2109 rnbrshp City of Temecula 130.00 130.00 121872 02!0712008 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Support Pmt Gase # DF099118 25.00 25.00 121873 02/07/2008 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVATION 2007 4th Qtr pmt:Strong Motion 8,113.41 8,113.41 121874 02/0712008 000502 CALIF MUNI STATISTICS financial svcs:debt statement 450.00 450.00 121875 02/07/2008 011756 CARLOS, ART refund: San Diego excursion 10129 50.00 50.00 121876 02/07/2008 011724 GHARTHOUSE LEARNING CORP. deposit:exec stafftrng 2121-22 1,500.00 1,500.00 121877 02/07/2008 004609 CINTAS DOCUMENT 1118 City doe shredding sues 132.50 132.50 MANAGEMENT 121878 02/0712008 004017 COMERCHERO, JEFF Reimb:NLCC:1 111 2-1 6/0 7:NewOrleans 97.21 97.21 121879 02/0712008 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES Community Health Charities Payment 107.05 107.05 121880 02107!2008 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS Alarm maint:Children's Museum 75.00 75.00 121881 02/0712008 006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, ING Network cnslt sues: Library 425.00 Computer Supplies: Info Sys 75.43 500.43 121882 02!0712008 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE misc supplies: TGC 663.61 Supplies: Team PACE Activities 193.32 856.93 121883 02/0712008 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC plumbing secs: Children's Museum 85.00 85.00 INC 121884 02/0712008 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & Jan repair/maint:traffic cameras 1,960.00 1,960.00 DATA Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 02107/20D8 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121885 02J07/2008 004408 CUB SCOUT PACK refund:rentalideposit CRG 2119 271.00 271.00 121886 02/0712008 OD4123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Feb lease pymt:Police storefront 2,638.42 2,638.42 121887 02/0712008 OD8533 DAMKO, CHRISTINE Reimb:Form-Based Trng:1/24-27:Phoenix 197.13 197.13 121888 02/0712008 010772 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION subsc: EnglDcr sq ft costbook'08 65.86 65.86 121889 02J0712008 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL portable restroom: Veterans Park 79.63 SRVCS portable restroom: Redhawk Park 59.63 portable restroom: Lng Cyn Park 59.63 portable restroom: Vail Rnch Park 59.63 258.52 121890 02/07/2008 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint 1,5D3.35 INC Fuel for City vehicles: B&S 529.93 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Lnd Dv 446.71 Fuel for City vehicles: Planning 380.58 Fuel for City vehicles: PW CIP 102.45 Fuel far City vehicles: PW Traffic 33.92 2,996.94 121891 02!0712008 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION Misc supplies: PW Maint 71.02 Misc supplies: PW Maint 50.36 121.38 121892 02107!2008 004592 ELITE BOBCAT SERVICE INC Dec const:Diaz Rd Realign Phase II 48,260.53 48,260.53 121893 02!0712008 005692 ELMO, ANTHONY Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121894 02/07/2008 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Dec housing enslt Svcs: Planning 4,756.28 ASSOC. Dec hospital EIR secs: Planning 3,301.15 8,D57.43 121895 02107/2008 000478 FAST SIGNS Merc signs: Theater 44.83 Merc signs: Theater 34.61 Merc signs: Theater 27.D6 106.50 121896 02/0712008 007659 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE title reports: 41863/52 Main St 1,500.00 1,500.00 INSURANCE Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Gantinued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121897 02/07/2008 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER BROOKSTONE GY EE recognition service awards 1,638.04 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES GR Airfare:Civic Bond Mtg:Oakland:Staff 620.00 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Regist:CPRS Cf:2126-29:McCracken 409.00 SOG CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Regist:CPRS Cf:2t26-29:Pelletier 409.00 SOC CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Regist:GPRS Cf:2t26-29:Ruse 409.00 SOG CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Regist:CPRS Cf:2126-29:Zigler 409.00 SOC AMERICAN AIRLINES RR Airfare:Annl NLCC Cf:318-12: Wshgtn 380.00 AMERICAN AIRLINES JC Airfare:Annl NLCC Cf:318-12: Wshgtn 360.00 PRO TECH SERVICES-PARTS HP Repair parts for pool heater 219.81 DEPOT CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Membership: Jahn Maisey 155.00 SOG CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Membership: Gail Zigler 135.00 SOG BLACKANGUS GY Refreshments: New Camm.Orientation 105.86 CALIF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE GY Labor law posters 92.96 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION HP Regist:GPRS Cf:2t26-29:Adamiak 70.00 5OG PAYPAL GR BL Verisign Payftow Pro Trans: 59.95 MARIE CALLENDER GY Refreshments:Union Mtg 33.02 RESTAURANT 25 DOUBLETREE HOTEL GYMeaI:ACRE Canf Presentation:1123 33.02 ONTARIO AIRPORT GY Prkg:ARGE Conf Presentation:1123 6.00 5,544.66 121898 02/0712008 009549 FISK, STUART Reimb:Farm-Based Trng:1124-27:Phoenix 221.32 221.32 121899 02107!2008 003281 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS Child Safety Proma Items:Police 2,505.93 Child Safety Promo Items:Police 804.80 3,310.73 121900 02107!2008 010325 FORT DEARBORN LIFE Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment 996.90 996.90 121901 02/0712008 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Pmt Case # 452379267 75.00 75.00 121902 02/07/2008 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS supplies: Theater 919.28 91928 Pages apChkLst 02107/20D8 4:47:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121903 02!0712008 000172 G A S B 5ubscriptian: GARS 3108-3109 440.00 440.00 121904 02/0712008 007866 G G S SUPPLIES INC printer tonerlcartridges: Info Sys 1,657.05 1,657.05 121905 02/0712008 004514 G T S I CORP Panasonic backlit keybaards:Fire 945.83 945.83 121906 02/0712008 007279 GAIL MATERIALS ING field maint:RRSP/Harveston parks 1,997.63 field maint:RRSP/Harveston parks 1,D18.33 field repairlmaint: RRSP 925.8D 3,941.76 121907 02/0712008 004890 GOLDEN STATE FIRE sprinkler repairlmaint:Maint Fac 868.00 868.00 PROTECTION 1219D8 02/07120D8 003792 GRAINGER misctaols: fire prevention 226.20 226.2D 121909 02/0712008 011744 GUARDIAN FIRE PROTECTION refund fire plan cklinspection fees 1,446.00 INC refund:fire plan cklinspection fees 1,440.00 2,886.00 121910 0210712008 OD5311 H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER swimming pool repair: CRC 700.00 SPCL. Jan pool maint Svcs: CRCtfES 450.00 fuel refill pool sump pumps:CRGITES 17.41 1,167.41 121911 02J0712008 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY reimb: LGC Inland geotech sues 750.00 750.00 121912 02!0712008 000186 HANKS HARDWARE ING Hardware supplies: PUUMaint 211.95 Hardware supplies: TV Museum 103.14 Hardware supplies: Aquatics 30.79 Hardware supplies: Sports Pgm 23.54 Hardware supplies: Maint Facility 17.35 Hardware supplies: Library 1.03 387.80 121913 02/0712008 008244 HARVEY, SCOTT Retirement Medical Payment 577.97 577.97 121914 02/0712008 OOD963 HOGAN, DAVI^ Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121915 02107!2008 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY equip repairs: PW Maint 590.00 590.00 121916 02J0712008 011342 I A C ENGINEERING INC. Dec const:Murrieta Creek trail 35,100.00 35,100.00 121917 02!0712008 000194 I G M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment 12,588.34 12,588.34 303355 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121918 02!0712008 009135 IMPACT MARKETING & DESIGN Uniform shirts: TCSD 152.24 152.24 INC 121919 02/07/2008 010676 INTERWEST CONSULTING Dec plan check svcs: B&S 3,764.88 3,764.88 GROUPING 121920 02/0712008 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 3108-09 ICSC mbrshp: Nelson, Shawn 100.00 3108-09 ICSC mb:Comerchero,Jeff 50.00 150.00 121921 02ID7120D8 010119 IRS - OIC Sup Pmt Offer#10D0497587 452379267 140.11 140.11 121922 02/0712008 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 877.10 TCSD instructor earnings 646.80 1,523.90 121923 02/0712008 011741 J C FRAMING INC custom milled cedar siding:Theater 500.00 500.00 121924 02J0712008 011754 JONES, MARY refund: lost library materials 14.99 14.99 121925 02ID7120D8 010802 JONES, STEPHEN refund: security deposit CRC 1211 150.00 150.D0 121926 02/07120D8 002575 JONES, SUSAN W. Reimb:SGOOA Mtg:1/24:Pismo Beach ZD0.49 200.49 121927 02/0712008 004D62 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC radar repair & maint: Police 213.56 213.56 121928 02/0712008 000209 L & M FERTILIZER ING equip repair/maint:Stn 73 & 84 150.99 mist supplies: PW Maint 3.02 154.01 121929 02!0712008 009521 LIONEL'S VINYL'S taxi decals: Police 309.24 309.24 121930 02/0712008 011760 LIVINGSTON, MARIA refund: Tennis-Sierra 44.00 44.00 121931 0210712008 DD3782 MAIN STREET SIGNS Street signs:pw maint div 1,136.76 Street signs:pw maint div 193.95 1,330.71 121932 021D7120D8 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY temp help wle 01/20 T. Fish 953.60 953.60 SERVICES 121933 02/07/2008 OD4307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS Jan water maint srvcs:HarvlDuck Pond 4,855.00 4,855.OD 121934 02/0712008 011721 MARRS, LYDIA refund:rentallCRC 3116108 201.00 201.00 121935 02/07/2008 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPAN Y MetLife Dental Insurance Payment 8,056.80 8,056.80 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 02107/20D8 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121936 02107/2008 007210 MIDORI GARDENS Irrigation repairs- Community Prk 1213 653.91 653.91 121937 02/0712008 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING Repair handrail:harveston lake 212.00 212.D0 INC. 121938 021D7J20D8 011440 MILLMORE'S WAX CREW City vehicles detailing svcs:PW Depts 150.00 150.D0 121939 02/07120D8 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS business cards:L.L.iT.P.lL.B. 134.85 134.85 121940 02107!2008 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 1 14-21210 8 modular bldg rental:Stn 92 832.40 832.40 121941 02!0712008 004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES Jan EOG Stn Satellite Phone Svcs 72.57 72.57 LP 121942 02/0712008 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Raad srvcs:jedediahltem pkwy 4,156.00 Grading srvcs:rancha vista rd 2,950.00 Excavation srvcs: service level R 1,510.00 8,616.00 121943 02/07/2008 OD0230 MUNIFINANCIAL Dec Srvc Level C Election Balloting 3,395.00 3,395.OD 121944 021D7120D8 001986 MUZAK-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Feb music broadcast:Old Town 69.11 69.11 121945 02/07/2008 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Auta Parts &Misc Supplies: Stn 92 9.60 9.60 121946 02/0712008 002037 NEXUS INTEGRATION SERVICES 2!1108-1!31!09 phone sys maint: I.S. 8,080.80 8,080.80 121947 02/07120D8 010289 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC Track-It! Enterprise Self Srvc Packs:I.S 846.23 846.23 121948 021D7120D8 011748 OCHOA, HAYDEE refund:Ballroam Dancet3200.102 22.40 22.40 121949 02!0712008 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Misc office supplies:Police 181.77 DIV Cntrl Svcs office supplies 57.19 238.96 Page:B apChkLst 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121950 02!0712008 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 877.60 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 268.32 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 211.37 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 206.17 City Vehicle RepairlMaint SYcs 100.45 City Vehicle RepairlMaint S1res 80.00 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Secs 75.37 City Vehicle RepairlMaint SYcs 38.75 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Sacs 33.14 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 26.25 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 21.44 1,938.86 121951 02107!2008 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY recreation supplies: c. museum 40.75 40.75 INC 121952 02107/2008 005456 OTT, WENDELL reimb:picture frames(f. Museum 86.39 86.39 121953 02/0712008 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC Dec plan ck review srvcs:B&S Dept. 12,675.00 12,675.00 121954 02/0712008 011761 PALOMAR HERITAGE BUILDING refund:eng.deposit/41955 5th Street 23,500.00 23,500.00 LLC 121955 02/0712008 010547 PARKS, RON Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121956 02/0712008 011758 PAYNE, CRYSTAL refund:sec.deposit/crc 1126/08 150.00 150.00 121957 02/0712008 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PERS Long Term Gare Payment 305.56 305.56 PROGRAM 121958 02!0712008 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 633.30 633.30 121959 0210712008 001999 PITNEY BOWES 9116-12/15!07 postage meter: Stn 84 105.55 1 211 6-311 5108 postage meter: Stn 84 96.94 202.49 121960 02/07/2008 011720 PLUS 4 ENGINEERING INC Simulator Solution:Police 109.05 109.05 121961 02/0712008 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS pool chemicals:aquatics pgrm 199.86 199.86 INC 121962 02/07/2008 006084 POWER DISTRIBUTORS INC lighting repair & maint:rrsp 997.50 997.50 121963 02!0712008 005820 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC Prepaid Legal Services Payment 512.15 512.15 Page9 apChkLst 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121964 02!0712008 011751 PUAHI'S POLYNESIAN DANCERS refund:sec.depositlGRG 1!13!08 150.00 150.00 INC 121965 02/07/2008 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various TCSD Water Meters 731.52 Jan 01-08-38D09-0 Fire Stn 92 83.42 814.94 121966 02/07/2008 D02654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN vehicle purchase:tcsd maint div. 28,626.07 28,626.07 MERCURY 121967 02/0712008 DD0271 RBF CONSULTING Nov prof srvcs: Old Town Infrastructure 4,312.03 4,312.03 121968 02/07/2008 OD7122 REDHAWK COMMUNTIES, INC. refund:application feesIPA07-D22D 49,496.00 refund:application fees/B07-1709 40,492.64 refund:application fees/PA06-0370 9,401.00 refund application fees/PA07-0048 6,780.00 refund:applicatian fees/PA06-0279 1,178.00 refund:application fees/PA07-0090 463.00 107,810.64 121969 02107!2008 002110 RENTAL SERVICE Equip rental:PW mntc 54.30 54.30 CORPORATION 121970 02/0712008 011762 REPPLINGER, BARBARA refund:sec.depasit/mpsc 2!2!08 150.00 150.00 121971 02/07/2008 004498 REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT traffic sig supplies: PW 2,644.83 traffic sig repair&maint: Tem.Pkwy/Kevin 1,591.69 traffic sig repair&maint:Pech.Pkwy/W.VIy 1,524.23 traffic sig supplies: PW 673.00 6,433.75 121972 02!0712008 011738 RITMO ARTISTS LLG Geno Delafose's performance:Thtr 1126 3,255.00 3,255.00 121973 02!07!2008 000418 RIVERSIDE GO CLERK & Res Imprv Prgm: Riedy, J. & C. 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 121974 02!0712008 000418 RIVERSIDE GO CLERK & Res Imprv Prgm: Kupisiewicz, J. & M. 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 121975 02107!2008 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & Res Imprv Prgrn: Grunauer, A. & V. 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 121976 0210712008 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & Res Imprv Prgm: Messer, N. & E. 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 121977 02107!2008 001365 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF envir.health permit: F.O.C. 605.00 605.00 121978 02/0712008 011101 RIVERSIDE LAND Dec consulting srvcs:Open Space 8,871.33 8,871.33 CONSERVANCY Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 121979 02107/2008 011759 ROBINSON, JUNE refund:Kids Lave Socceri1613.101 121980 02/0712008 003001 ROSS FENCE INC. Res Imprv Prgm: Bingham, Janet 121981 02/0712008 010759 S P M A, SOUTHERN PACIFIC 'OS agency membership dues 121982 02/0712008 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment 121983 02J0712008 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Pmt account # 581095025 121984 02/07/2008 010089 SEGURITAS SECURITY SRVCS 1 11 8-2 410 8 security srvcs:stn 95 USA 1112-8107 security srvcs:stn 95 121985 02/07/2008 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV -CENTRAL Support Payment: Payment 121986 02/07/2008 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV -CENTRAL Support Pmt LO File # 20 0705 26 1 8 121987 02/0712008 010745 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 121988 02/07/2008 011750 SHUBIN, MARIA 121989 02/07/2008 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 121990 02!0712008 000645 SMART & FINAL INC painting supplies:harveston lake park refund:Date Nights18100.102 & .103 "please keep door closed" sign:F.O.C. recreation supplies:mpsc recreation supplies:crc Amount Paid 82.00 1,789.00 60.00 1,068.26 12.50 1,357.96 1,279.51 204.02 100.00 33.86 50.00 37.73 65.25 34.19 Page: 11 Check Total 82.00 1,789.00 60.00 1,068.26 12.50 2,637.47 204.02 100.00 33.86 50.00 37.73 99.44 Page:i 1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 02107/20D8 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121991 02!0712008 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Jan 2-00-397-5042 Gity Hall 5,394.93 Jan 2-28-629-0507 Library 5,339.10 Jan 2-27-805.3194 Theater 3,019.09 Jan 2-29-223-8607 Old Twn PED 2,3D9.53 Jan 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac 1,333.29 Jan 2-20-798-3248 C. Museum 820.52 Jan 2-18-937-3152 T.Museum 467.83 Jan 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chpl 102.62 Feb 2-29-479-2981 Hghwy 79S 102.06 Jan 2-29-657-2563 Various TGSD 76.08 Jan 2-29-458-7548 Wolf Crk PED 66.94 Jan 2-29-9747568 Ynez Rd TC-1 49.95 Jan 2-29-9747899 Ynez Rd LS-3 41.53 Jan 2-1 4-2041 61 5 Front St Rdio 33.85 Jan 2-29-953-8082 Wolf Valley 18.35 Jan 2-29-657-2332 Redwood Rd PED 16.38 Jan 2-29-953.8249 Walf Crk Dr PED 14.85 Jan 2-29-953-8447 VVIf Vlly Rd PED 14.85 Jan 2-29-807-1226 Diaz Rd Irrigation 14.34 19,236.09 121992 02/07/2008 D01212 SO GALIF GAS COMPANY Jan 091-D24-9300-5 CRC 5,218.25 Dea 091-024-9300-5 CRC 4,557.72 Jan 091-085-1632-0 T.E.S. Pool 3,053.20 Jan Gas meters for City Facilities 2,607.11 Jan 1D1-525-1560-6 Fire Stn 73 686.95 16,123.23 121993 02/0712008 OD8018 SO CALIF WASTE MGMT FORUM Waste Mgmt Forum:B.Smith 3119/08 50.00 50.00 121994 02/0712008 OD7851 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & AIR HVAC maint & repair:mpsc 356.25 LaborlHVAG repair:Library 150.00 506.25 121995 02/07/2008 007762 STANDARD OF OREGON Mandatory Life Insurance Payment 11,330.56 11,330.56 121996 02J0712008 003840 STRONGS PAINTING Painting srvcs:CRC 3,600.00 3,600.00 121997 02!0712008 011420 SUNSET METAL WORKS INC Theater steel light covers 673.44 673.44 121998 02107!2008 011667 T & T JANITORIAL INC Jan janitorial srvcs:Gity Facilities 7,301.76 7,301.76 121999 02/0712008 011749 T. V. G. A. refund:sec.deposit/CRC 1120/08 150.00 150.00 122000 D2/07/2008 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS recreation supplies:tcc 155.94 recreation suppfies:mpsc 89.67 245.61 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 02/07/2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122001 02107/2008 OD1547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Union Dues Payment 5,160.00 5,160.00 122002 02/0712008 0095D0 TEMEG ELECTRONICS, INC Dec computer supplieslequip:l.S./PW 415.39 415.39 122003 02/0712008 D01035 TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL Jul-Dec'D7 trash hauling services 2,610,705.90 credit:Jul-Dec '07 trash hauling srvcs -69,461.04 2,541,244.86 122004 02/0712008 005633 TEMECULA MIDDLE SCHOOL Perfarmance:old town holiday 1218 250.00 250.00 122005 02!0712008 011736 TEMECULA TROPHY INC recognition awards:human resources 342.91 2 nametags: M. Edwards 17.13 2 nameplates: Patrick/Stanley 16.16 376.20 122006 02!0712008 008284 TEMECULA VALLEY CHARTER refund:sec.deposit/CRC 1118108 150.00 150.D0 SCHOOL 122007 02/07/2008 D04274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith srvcs:foc building 1,229.34 1,229.34 CENTR 122008 02/0712008 ODD919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED Dec City vehicles fuel usage 317.04 317.04 SCHOOL 122009 02/0712008 000316 THORNHILL, GARY Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 122010 02107!2008 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Jan high speed Internet CW 54.95 54.95 122011 02/0712008 009912 U R 5 CORPORATION PE 1!11108 eng srvcs:Western Bypass 14,956.18 14,956.18 122012 02!07!2008 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 73.00 73.00 122013 0210712008 004261 VERIZON Jan xxx-5706 Field OPS Cntr 292.94 Jan xxx-5509 general usage 145.03 Jan xxx-2016 reverse 911 120.39 Jan xxx-3526 f re alarm 97.63 Jan xxx-9897 general usage 88.57 Jan xxx-0049 general usage 42.58 Jan xxx-1999 general usage 37.66 Jan xxx-7786 G. Washington 33.82 Jan xxx-5696 Sports Complex 32.55 Jan xxx-2676 general usage 32.55 923.72 122014 02/0712008 010245 VILLA, DOLORES Retirement Medical Payment 585.88 585.88 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 02107/20D8 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid 122015 02107/2008 009101 VISION ONE ING Dec Showareticketing srvcs:theater 1,944.80 122016 02/0712008 011290 WE JUST DELIVER rfrshmnts:city council meeting 1122 211.87 122017 02/0712008 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 111-15108 tree trimming srvcs:citywide 34,650.00 122018 02/0712008 000339 WEST PUBLISHING GORP '08 Penal Cade Baaks:Police SRO 198.74 122019 02/0712008 011757 WHITEHEAD, LORI refund: tennis camp11410.101 95.00 122020 02!0712008 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Medical supplies:Paramedics 1,396.44 Medical supplies:Paramedics 776.61 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: Page: 14 Check Total 1,944.80 211.87 34,650.00 198.74 95.00 2,173.05 3,573,688.59 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 02107!2008 4:47:32PM CITY OF TEMECl1LA 182 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 3,573,688.59 Page:15 apChkLst 02/14/2008 10:38:59AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122021 02/08/2008 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK Old Twn Christmas 11!23-12122/07 2,100.00 2,1DD.00 122022 02/1312008 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & recording fee:Ntc/Determination-Hospital 64.00 64.00 RECORDER 122023 02/14/2008 D02786 4N6XPRT SYSTEMS Forensic software: Police 330.00 330.OD 122024 02J1412008 008552 ADKINS DESIGN CONSULTING graphic design sdcs:cultural arts 888.94 888.94 122025 02!1412008 011629 AGLE, AIMEE Reimb:Theater hospitality expenses 101.74 101.74 122026 02!14/2008 009010 ALEXANDER PACIFIC Electrical repair srvcs:library 880.00 880.OD 122027 02/14/2008 011769 ALL FROM THE HEART INC FY 071D8 Comm Srvc Funding 3,000.00 3,000.00 122028 02/1412008 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Mar stand by fee: Police 1,000.00 DUI & drug screeings: Police 322.00 DUI & drug screeings: Police 222.00 1,544.00 122029 02/1412008 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING HtI:Nt'I Planning Gf:Chiniaeff:LasVegas 815.32 815.32 ASSOCIATION 122030 02/14/2008 D00747 AMERICAN PLANNING HtI:Nt'I Planning Gf:Guerriero:LasVegas 815.32 815.32 ASSOCIATION 122031 02/1412008 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING HtI:Nt'I Planning Cf:Harter:LasVegas 407.66 407.66 ASSOCIATION 122032 D2/14/2008 004787 AMERIMARK DIRECT recycle pgrm recognition awards 711.65 711.65 122033 02/14/2008 000101 APPLE ON E INC Temp help PPE 1126 Ortiz 710.OD Temp help PPE 1126 Morrison 360.48 1,070.48 122034 02/14/2008 OD2648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN Membership:013298563 Voshall, J 47.00 47.00 CALIF 122035 02!1412008 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN Membership: Dale Hoof 69686154 47.00 47.OD CALIF 122036 02/1412008 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS Pauba rd slope & erosion repairs 7,707.59 7,707.59 INC Page:i apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 02114/2008 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122037 02!1412008 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS TGSD instructor earnings 560.00 560.00 122038 02!1412008 005292 BUTLER, GREG Reimb:Refreshment for interview Panel 83.81 83.81 122039 02/1412008 005063 C E L S O C 11 Manuals:CEQA Guidelines 350.55 350.55 122040 02/1412008 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 795.07 F'UV patch truck materials 204.73 999.80 122041 02!1412008 000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER Prof license renewal:S.Beswick 125.00 125.00 AFFAIRS 122042 02J1412008 000486 CALIF MUNI REVENUE & TAX 'OS municipal bus. tax assoc 60.00 60.00 A55OC 122043 02/1412008 002520 CALIF T'S SGREENPRINTING recognition shirts:executive staff 609.87 609.87 122044 02/14/2008 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY Jan helium tanks rentallrefill:TCSD 41.72 41.72 122045 02/14/2008 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Feb Copier Lease: Fire Stn 92 182.55 182.55 INC 122046 02/1412008 010101 CASH FOR RIVERSIDE CO. INC. FY 07!08 Community Svc Funding 3,000.00 3,000.00 122047 02/14/2008 006114 CASEY, MARGIE Reimb:Misc Supplies 69.00 69.00 122048 02!1412008 011510 CATO GEOSGIENGE INC Jan cnslt svcs:5anta Marg annex 6,455.65 6,455.65 122049 02114!2008 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION Jan investigative database svc:PD 203.70 203.70 122050 02/1412008 011724 CHARTHOUSE LEARNING CORP. Customer service trng:City Wide 6,750.00 6,750.00 122051 02/14/2008 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC Gityvehiclesfuel: Police 807.80 City vehicles fuel: GM 278.87 1,086.67 122052 02/14/2008 004609 CINTAS DOCUMENT Feb doc shredding secs: City Hall 132.50 MANAGEMENT Feb document shred svc:PD storefront 32.50 165.00 122053 02/14/2008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2/26-311:LgBeach:Parker 720.34 720.34 122054 02!1412008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2126-311:LgBeach:Zigler 720.34 720.34 Paget apChkLst 02114/2008 1D:38:59AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122055 02!1412008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2/26-3/1:LgBeach:Maisey 720.34 720.34 122056 02/14/2008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:GPRS Cf:2126-3l1:LgBeach:Adamiak 720.34 720.34 122057 02/1412008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2126-3/1:LgBeach:Fox 720.34 720.34 122058 02/1412008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2126-311:LgBeach:Betz 720.34 720.34 122059 02J1412008 011770 COAST LONG BEACH HOTEL HtI:CPRS Cf:2126-27:LgBeach:Nelson 192.85 192.85 122060 02/14/2008 004414 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN Nov-Dec Design Svcs:Pechanga Pkwy 2,837.92 2,837.92 GROUP 122061 02/14/2008 006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC network cnslt secs: Gity Hall 1,000.00 1,000.00 122062 02/14/2008 001264 COSTGO WHOLESALE mist supplies:Team PACE 517.30 mist supplies:gift giving event 155.45 Refreshments:fire prevention mtgs 72.51 Refreshments:fire prevention mtgs 59.95 805.21 122063 02/14/2008 004222 DIAMONDBACK FIRE & RESCUE, Fire Stn 84- 14" rescue saw 1,233.74 1,233.74 INC 122064 02/14/2008 009833 DISNEYLAND RESORTS-LOCAL ht1:315-7 CSMFO cf GR,JS,PB,RG 1,738.80 1,738.80 CORP 122065 02/14/2008 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK Jan '08 special events premiums 2,625.29 2,625.29 122066 02/14/2008 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for Gity vehicles: PWITCSD 2,123.06 INC Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD/ISIPW 101.45 2,224.51 122067 02/14/2008 007319 EAGLE ROAD SERVICE & TIRE PW mntc vehicle repair & maint 867.85 867.85 INC 122068 02/14/2008 005093 EAGLES PEAK CHARTER Theater Settlement:"12 Angry Jurors" 992.00 992.00 SCHOOL 122069 02/1412008 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY Feb state lobbying secs: CM 3,500.00 3,500.00 LLG 122070 02!1412008 007364 EMED COMPANY ING pedestrian control equip: CRG 904.21 904.21 122071 02!14/2008 009565 EMPTY CRADLE FY 07!08 Community Svc Funding 3,000.00 3,000.00 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 02!14/2008 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Gantinued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122072 02!1412008 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL GLEANING Jan public restroom maint:Gitywide 5,102.00 5,102.00 122073 02/14/2008 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS GIS training 1131-2/1: Beal, Kelli 950.00 950.00 RESEARCH 122074 02/14/2008 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 1116-21 express mail sues: Citywide 350.13 350.13 122075 02/14/2008 011772 FELIGITA FINANCIAL Parcel No.23496 public improvements 302,559.61 302,559.61 CORPORATE 122076 02/14/2008 003281 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS Child Safety Promo Items:Palice 3,533.08 crime prevention promo items:PD 2,071.65 5,604.73 122077 02!14!2008 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY INC day planner supplies:finance 40.44 day planner supplies:finance 20.69 61.13 122078 02114!2008 001937 GALLS 1NC Traffic Supplies Police: CAP pgrm 747.83 747.83 122079 02/1412008 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH &ASSOGIATES Nov design svcs:DePortola Rd 1,520.05 1,520.05 INC 122080 02114!2008 009094 GLENEAGLES CORPORATION, Res Imp Prgm: Deborah High 4,550.00 4,550.00 THE 122081 02!1412008 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS office supplies:fire prevlstn 73 & 84 958.21 INC Office Supplies: B&S 598.08 Office Supplies: TCSD 453.61 OfFce Supplies: Planning 323.03 Office Supplies: CMIEcn DvlCouncil 309.81 Office Supplies: Info Sys 212.68 Office Supplies: Library 206.37 office supplies:Finance 199.73 office supplies:pw admin 146.34 Office Supplies: Theater 120.57 office supplies:CRC 92.00 Office supplies: HR 82.62 office supplies:RDA-LowlMod 79.36 Office Supplies: Records 35.14 Office Supplies: City Clerk 23.15 3,840.70 122082 02/1412008 005947 GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT Express Mail Service:Fire Prev. 46.65 46.65 122083 02/1412008 003792 GRAINGER Fire Stn 84 maint & repairs sacs 245.49 245.49 Page:4 apChkLst D2114/20D8 1D:38:59AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122084 02l14/20D8 000520 H D L GOREN & GONE INC Jan-Mar Property tax consulting:finance 5,000.00 5,000.00 122085 02/14/2008 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: CRC 390.65 Hardware supplies: MPSG 109.01 499.66 122086 02/14/2008 010879 HINMAN & GARMICHAEL LLP Dec Svcs Abc License: Theater 680.12 680.12 122087 02!1412008 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE Mntc repair parts: Parks 195.81 195.81 122088 02!1412008 001517 HORIZON HEALTH Feb employee assistance pgm:HR 893.20 893.20 122089 02114/2008 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC Jan flex benefit plan pmt 727.50 727.50 122090 02!1412008 006713 INTEGRATED MEDIA SYSTEMS audiovisual sys upgrade: Library 4,733.25 audiovisual sys upgrade: Library 4,141.60 8,874.85 122091 02/14/2008 003296 INTL CODE COUNCIL Certification Renewal:G.Formoe 50.00 50.D0 122092 02l14/20D8 OD4119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY INC Signal supplies:pw traffic div 2,155.00 2,155.00 122093 02114/2008 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC Rod Run banner maint:Econ Dev 3,311.58 3,311.58 122094 02/1412008 011594 KENDALL PRODUCTS dri dektiles:Fire Stn 92 84.26 84.26 122095 02/14/2008 OD1091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATE S Jan consulting srvcs:RDA housing 870.63 INC Jan consulting srvcs:Real Estate Ecom 395.00 1,265.63 122096 02/14/2D08 004481 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES Dec design svc:Santiago Det Basin 8,105.00 8,1D5.OD INC 122097 02/14/2008 DD1282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC Water Heater Equip:Tes Pool 494.00 494.D0 122098 D2/14/2008 01012D L G C INLAND INC Geotech srvcs:Verizon Fiber Optic 5,175.D0 5,175.OD 122099 02/1412008 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC safety supplies: pw mntc division 906.00 safety supplies: pw mntc division 719.20 1,625.20 122100 02114/2008 006744 LAMAR CORPORATION, THE Feb billboard lease-Old Town 3,380.00 Chg out Old Town billboard 600.00 3,980.00 122101 02J1412008 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT Welk Resort excursion 2119:MPSC 780.00 780.00 THEATRE Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 02114/2008 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122102 02!1412008 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES '08 LCC mbrshp dues: City 100.00 100.00 122103 02/14/2008 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC Nov-Jan geatech svcs:Civic Gtr 4,868.49 4,868.49 122104 02/1412008 009285 LEISURE MORE CORP Sanitary blue pet waste bags:var parks 474.10 474.10 122105 02/1412008 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Paramedic Medical Supplies 1,489.11 Credit: returned Paramedic Supplies -116.04 1,373.07 122106 02!1412008 011003 LINE MASTER ENGINEERING INC PW thermoplastic applicator trailer 34,486.04 34,486.04 122107 02J1412008 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS var. signs:santa getrudis trail 1,316.17 Street signs:pw maint div 64.65 1,380.82 122108 02114!2008 004141 MAINTEX ING custodial supplies: var park sites 376.35 custodial supplies: var park sites 229.18 custodial supplies: crc 193.93 custodial supplies: foc 157.43 956.89 122109 02/1412008 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY temp help w/e 01127 Fish, Tammy 762.88 762.88 SERVICES 122110 02114!2008 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS consulting srvcs:'08 Bluegrass Festival 1,000.00 1,000.00 122111 02/1412008 004894 MICHAEL BRANDMAN Dec eng srvcs:Pechanga Pkwy II 215.00 215.00 ASSOCIATES 122112 02114!2008 011440 MILLMORE'S WAX CREW City vehicles detailing svcs:PW Depts 75.00 75.00 122113 02/1412008 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS business cards: T.Shymanski 85.77 85.77 122114 02/14/2008 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS Oct Consult Srvcs:F.V.II-15 Overcross 87,109.12 87,109.12 122115 02/14/2008 001214 MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTIONS, Equipment rental:Theater 1/26108 320.00 320.00 LLC 122116 02/14/2008 001986 MUZAK-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Feb "On-Hold" Phone Music:City Fac's 133.63 133.63 122117 02/14/2008 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS vehicle partslsupplies:fire stn 84 61.15 61.15 122118 02!1412008 010504 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Dec 6 -Jan 25'08 cellular usagelequip 1,396.67 1,396.67 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 D2i14/20D8 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122119 02!1412008 008528 NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSETTO Nov eng srvcs:Civic Center Phase II 110,376.65 Nov dsgn:old town infrastructure 80,269.95 190,646.60 122120 02!1412008 010244 NO LIMITS SILK SCREEN 2nd Place Wtr/Sprg Season T-shirts 1,055.81 1st Place UVtr/Sprg Season Sweatshirts 494.80 2nd Place WtriSprg Season Sweatshirts 325.74 1st Place I/Vtr/Sprg Season Sweatshirts 266.91 2,143.26 122121 02!14!2008 009337 NOLTEASSOCIATES INC 1 1 12 3-1 2120!07 dsgn srvcs:ped bridge 1,388.58 1,388.58 122122 02/1412008 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIM ES Jan displayads:theater 1,387.65 Jan recruitment ads:human resources 1,313.22 Jan public ntc ads:City ClerkiPln 509.12 3,209.99 122123 02/1412008 009570 O C B REPROGRAPHICS Dup.Blueprints:Roripaugh Ranch Fire Stn 237.38 237.38 122124 02I14/20D8 D02292 OASIS VENDING coffee & kitchen supplies: ch 437.17 coffee & kitchen supplies: foc 285.03 coffee & kitchen supplies: mf 156.19 coffee & kitchen supplies: foc 120.98 999.37 122125 02/1412008 0021 D5 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 268.68 City Vehicle RepairiMaint Svcs 268.32 City Vehicle RepairiMaint Svcs 211.37 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 206.17 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 100.45 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 96.96 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 94.27 City Vehicle RepairlMaint SUcs 80.00 City Vehicle RepairiMaint Sres 75.37 City Vehicle RepairiMaint Svcs 38.75 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 33.14 City Vehicle RepairiMaint Svcs 26.25 City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 21.44 1,521.17 122126 02/1412008 011768 OLSEN, MARTHA refund:special event insurance 37.00 37.00 122127 02J1412008 009694 ONSTAGE MUSICALS Big Band Jazz @ Theater 1!27108 7,602.83 7,602.83 122128 02!1412008 011765 OPHELIATHEATREGROUP OddCoupleiStarSpangledGirl:Thtr 3,621.55 3,621.55 122129 02/14120D8 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER INC Jan recruitment ads:human resources 865.00 865.D0 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 D2114/20D8 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Gantinued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122130 02!1412008 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY Var prizes:spring egg hunt event 1,903.68 1,903.68 INC 122131 02/1412008 002099 PASCOE MANAGEMENT LLP Feb restroom rental:old town 826.00 826.OD 122132 02/14/2008 007484 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC Aed's: Paramedics 1,517.34 CPR supplies paramedics 460.09 1,977.43 122133 02/14/2008 011660 PLANNET CONSULTING Jan consult srvcs:Civic Cntr IS Master 21,719.00 21,719.00 122134 02/14/2008 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY Jan recruitment ads:human resources 3,305.72 3,305.72 INC 122135 02/14/2008 003493 PRO-CRAFT Res Imprv Prgm: Clayton, Tracy 4,979.00 4,979.D0 122136 02!1412008 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Jan uniformslflr mtsitwl rentals:Gity 1,347.48 credit:charges not per contractlfac -35.20 1,312.28 122137 02!1412008 011618 QUEST TECHNOLOGIES ING Sound meter kits:code enforcement 6,042.15 6,042.15 122138 02!1412008 011547 RAMILAN ELECTRIC INC prgs pmt #1:trf sgnl -rancho/bus park w 51,270.00 ret.wlh pmt #1:trf sgnl - rancholbus -5,127.00 46,143.00 122139 02/14/2008 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various TCSD Water Meters 7,260.18 Various PW Water Meters 641.54 Various Fire Water Meters 386.33 Various RDA Water Meters 80.90 8,368.95 122140 02/1412008 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN Vehicle purchase:tcsd maint div. 28,626.07 28,626.07 MERCURY 122141 02114/2008 000271 RBF CONSULTING Dec Idsep dsgn:Winchester Rd 5,453.68 Dec Prof Srvcs:l-15JSr 79s Ult.lntrchg 1,039.08 6,492.76 122142 02/1412008 000526 REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF Map&Adv Crash Zone JGIJJ 2111-15 1,320.00 1,320.00 CALIF 122143 02/1412008 007402 RICHARD BRADY & ASSOCIATES 9130-1112/08 dsgn:Field Oper Center 20,369.00 20,369.00 122144 02114/2008 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON Dec 2007 legal services 109,107.24 109,107.24 122145 02!1412008 OD6483 RICHARDS, TYREOSHA I. TCSD Instructor Earnings 420.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 147.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 24.50 591.50 Page:B apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 02114/2008 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Gantinued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122146 02!1412008 011766 RIVERA, JOHNNY release claims agreement pmt 379.63 379.63 122147 02!1412008 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & recording fee:Ntc/Exemption-J.W.Rd. 64.00 64.00 RECORDER 122148 02/14/2008 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE July-September 2007:fire services 800,400.55 DEPARTMENT credit:not tem ee Mclaughlin/Richardson -2,579.54 797,821.01 122149 02/14/2008 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT January 2008 K Rat payment 455.00 455.00 122150 02/14/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT trafcollision investigation DHIJG 312.00 312.00 122151 02/14/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Traf.Collisian Invst 7/23-27 BraggsiAbbe 302.00 302.00 122152 02/14/2008 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. reimb:1 211 3-2/1 2!08 intemet srvc 106.65 106.65 122153 02J1412008 011764 RUSSELL SOON DDS "afternoon music,wine,sang":Thtr 213 445.45 445.45 122154 02!1412008 000277 S & S ARTS & GRAFTS ING recreation supplies: c. museum 45.73 45.73 122155 02!1412008 010799 SAN DIEGO BLOOD BANK FY 07108 Community Srvc Funding 1,000.00 1,000.00 122156 02/1412008 007345 SAN DIEGO STATE U 511107-4(30108 annual tower lease 5,098.50 5,098.50 FOUNDATION 122157 02/14/2008 007345 SAN DIEGO STATE U FY 07!08 Community Srvc Funding 500.00 500.00 FOUNDATION 122158 02/14/2008 010803 SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & Release retention:R.C.Rd. widening 81,244.47 81,244.47 GONST 122159 02/14/2008 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS Jan security srvcs:Harveston Lake 3,342.50 3,342.50 USA 122160 02/1412008 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz @ the Merc 1131/08 294.00 Jazz @ the Merc 2!7108 231.00 Jazz @ the Merc 1/24!08 199.50 724.50 122161 02114/2008 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW front counter signs:var city facilities 195.56 195.56 122162 02!14/2008 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC Dec eng srvcs:Main St bridge 2,787.20 billing adjiDec eng srvcs:main st bridge 69.00 2,856.20 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 D2114/20D8 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122163 02!1412008 001544 SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST Release retention:Tem.Educ.Gtr grading 291,262.17 291,262.17 122164 02!1412008 000645 SMART & FINAL INC recreation supplies: tcc 139.92 misc. supplies:familyfuH Hite pgrm 60.26 2D0.18 122165 02/14/2008 ODD537 SO CALIF EDISON Feb 2-01-202-7330 various mtrs 63,783.52 Feb 2-01-202-7603 arterial st lights 23,502.40 Feb 2-05-791-8807 various mtrs 11,300.59 Feb 2-02-351-5281 CRC 4,735.90 Feb 2-00-397-5067 various mtrs 1,372.01 Jan 2-10-331-2153 TCG 637.59 Feb 2-30-066-2889 Rancho Vista PED 22.68 105,354.69 122166 02114/2008 007341 SOUTH COAST WINERY, INC. depositlfacility rental:Vol.Recogn 1,000.00 1,000.00 122167 02/1412008 OOD519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL pest control srvcs:crowne hill 84.00 84.00 INC 122168 D2/14/2008 007851 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & AIR Jan HVAC prey maint:City facilities 4,190.00 Jan HVAC maint:Fire Stnstf.C.C. 535.00 HVAC repair:city hall-pw 406.31 5,131.31 122169 02!1412008 005786 SPRINT Dec 26 -Jan 25'08 cellular usage/equip 7,181.16 7,181.16 122170 02/14/2008 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS facility repair: stn 73 782.04 782.04 122171 02/14/2008 DD3840 STRONGS PAINTING Painting srvcs:history mus & chapel 3,500.00 3,500.00 122172 02/14/2008 OOD305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS recreation supplies: c. museum 60.41 60.41 122173 02/1412008 011736 TEMECULA TROPHY INC recognition awards:csd sports pgrm 638.85 638.85 122174 02/1412008 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY Dec'07 Bus. Imprv District Asmnts 37,870.51 37,870.51 CONVENTION & 122175 02/14/2008 007340 TEMECULA VALLEY FIRE EQUIP. Fire Extinguishers:csd new vehicles 92.52 92.52 GO 122176 02!1412008 OD4274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith services: parks 22.52 22.52 CENTR 122177 02J1412008 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED Student Exchange Prgm Sponsorship 3,400.00 3,400.00 SCHOOL Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 D2J14/20D8 1D:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 122178 02!1412008 008379 THEATRE FOUNDATION, THE "The Little Mermaid":Theater 2J2t08 1,580.99 1,580.99 122179 02!1412008 010276 TIME WARNER GABLE Feb high speed Internet City Hall 183.38 183.38 122180 02/1412008 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC traffic cntrl safety devices:PW Mntc 36.58 36.58 122181 02/14/2008 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Jan undrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW 400.50 400.50 122182 02114J20D8 003497 VAIL RANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL performance:old town holiday event 1218 150.00 150.D0 122183 02!1412008 004261 VERIZON Jan xxx-8900 GI5 Library 778.78 Jan xxx-753D GIS Library 439.95 Jan xxx-1540 Old Town Prk Lot 88.57 Jan xxx-5180 79S Irrg Gntr 35.69 1,342.99 122184 02/1412008 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Jan access-(EON) C. Mus.phone line 651.72 Jan access-(E05) GRC phone line 352.64 1,004.36 122185 02/1412008 004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC Feb tang distance phone svcs 627.74 627.74 122186 02/1412008 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC custodial supplies: crcifac 259.49 259.49 122187 02/1412008 011443 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC equip: pwtraffic div 1,686.29 1,686.29 122188 02114120D8 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC arborist srvcs: deer hollow 960.00 960.D0 122189 D2/14/20D8 D00621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE GOUNGIL January 2008 TUMF Payment 10,046.00 10,046.00 OF 122190 02114120D8 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY January 2008 MSHCP payment 3,039.84 3,039.84 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 2,419,940.43 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 02I14J2008 10:38:59AM CITY OF TEMECl1LA 170 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,419,940.43 Page:12 ITEM NCB. 4 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Approval of 2007-08 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Jason Simpson, Assistant Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007- 2008 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS BACKGROUND: Each year, the City conducts amid-year review of its operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. All City departments have reviewed their operating budgets and have identified any material adjustments required. The mid-year budget review includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, State Transportation Fund, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Law Enforcement, and the Internal Service Funds. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance thraugh December 31, 2007: Presents a summary of prior year and FY 2007-08 year-to-date actual activity, as well as the FY 2007-08 current and revised budget amounts. Also included is a schedule of beginning and estimated ending fund balance based upon the revised budget activity. Revenue Detail: Presents detail of prior year and FY 2007-08 year-to-date revenues, as well as the FY 2007-08 current and revised revenue estimates through December 31, 2007. GENERAL FUND: Revenues: The projected General Fund revenues reflect a $2,330,996 or 3.5% decrease from the current budget. Significant projected revenue decreases are as follows: - Sales and Use Tax decrease of $1,846,020from the State due to a State-wide economic downturn especially in the sale of new motor vehicles, lumber and building materials, and home electronics and appliances; - Significant decreases totaling $1,678,481 in permit fee activity for the following departments: Planning $582,276 and Land Development $1,096,205. The Planning decrease is primarily due to higher than anticipated decrease in new residential development caused by a slow dawn in the economy. Also for Land Development, the decrease is attributed to development agreement user fee activity included in the FY 07108 revenue estimates, as subsequent to the adoption of the budget, the City approved a development agreement to defer up to $2 million of development fees; - A $940,480 decrease in the Triple Flip Payment for sales tax due to an adjustment made by the State of an over advance of sales tax in the prior year caused by actual sales tax growth in 2007 being less than originally anticipated by the State; - A $400,000 decrease in Vehicle Cade fines due to a decline in the number of vehicle citations issued; - Also, a decrease of $200,000 in Property Transfer Taxes is due to continued decline in home prices and real estate sales activity. These revenues are more sensitive to home sales activity and more quickly reflect the slow dawn in the housing market as compared to property tax. The decreases above were partially offset due to the following items: - First-time receipt of Prop 1 B funds released by the Governor in the amount of $750,000 to fund street rehabilitation expenditures in the General Fund; - Increase in Interest earnings of $745,526 due to conservative estimates an earnings, plus the Federal Open Market Committee was reducing interest rates which created positive market value adjustments on the City's investments; - Increase of $514,601 for Property Tax in-lieu of Vehicle Licenses Fees from prior triple- flipadjustment (as received from the County} due to a higher than anticipated growth in the overall assessed valuation of real property in the City, which is offset by a decrease of $200,000 in Motor Vehicle Licenses received from the State for a net adjustment of $314,601; - Operating Transfers-In increase of $287,081 is primarily due to a one time transfer of accumulated reserves totaling $191,940 from the Gas Tax Fund to the General Fund and a higher than anticipated receipt from the State for the Law Enforcement Fund totaling $88,320. - Increase of $286,831 in Fire Department User Fees for inspection and plan check services related to the commercial and industrial development within the City; - Increase of $200,000 in Supplemental Taxes due to an increased number of property transactions than anticipated prior to the downturn in the housing market. These revenues are received up to 12 months following a property exchange. - Increase of $196,000 in Franchise Fees due primarily to Verizon Communications as a direct result of their installation of FIOS (high-speed fiber) within the City of Temecula over the past two years; Furthermore, the remaining modifications represent minoradjustments to various revenue line items in the General Fund. Appropriations: A total reduction in appropriations of $2,469,800 or 5.4% from the current budget is requested. A summary of these appropriation adjustments are as follows: - Fire Department: Decrease of $800,000 due to the delay in opening the Raripaugh Ranch Fire Station and the related staffing costs of that station. - Police Department: Reflects a $217,000 decrease due to a notification the City received of a recent legislative change which replaces the County collection of jail booking fees with an annual State appropriation of $35 million. In anyyearthatthe State appropriates $35 million for local detention facility revenue accounts, we will not be charged a basking fee, but instead a jail access fee. The difference between the two is the jail access fee is only for misdemeanor offenses and Municipal Code violations which exceed our three year average far those types of arrests. Currently, if arrests stay on trend the City is estimated to have 60 bookings over ourthree year average, which equates to an annual charge of $17,560. This is a significant decrease from the $234,945 we budgeted for Banking Fees - a savings of approximately $217,000. - Non-Departmental. Reflects a $520,000 decrease in REST contribution due to accumulated fund balance reserves in TCSD; Reflects a $400,000 decrease in Retiree Health Contribution due to a recent report by the City's actuary that the City's reserve for GASB 45 was 100% fully-funded, thus the $400,000 was not necessarythis year. The future annual contributions are estimated to be $253,000, which represents a go-forward annual savings of approximately $150,000. In addition to the reductions noted above, the following departments were reduced a total of amount of $542,800 due to a reduction in General Fund revenues: - City Council - $5,000 - City Manager - $10,000 - Economic Development - $35,000 - City Clerk - $5,000 - City Attorney - $50,000 - Finance - $25,000 - Human Resources - $10,000 - Planning - $40,000 - Building and Safety - $66,000 - Land Development - $17,800 - Public Works - $234,000 - CIP Admin - $15,000 - FEMA - $30,000 Gas Tax, State Transportation, and CDBG Funds: Based upon a review of the activity for the Gas Tax Fund and the State Transportation Fund, the City is transferring additional funds available to the General Fund from FY 2006-07 results for the Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $191,940 and the State Transportation Fund -Proposition 42 funds of $6,821. For the CDBG Fund, there is no proposed change or modification at this time. Law EnforcementFunds {AB3229 COPS): The Law Enforcement Fund has been increased due to an increased allocation of $88,320 under this grant funded program. These funds are transferred to the General Fund to provide for task force officers. Internal Service Funds: Based upon a review of the activityfor Insurance, there are no proposed changes or modifications to the budgets at this time. Based upon reductions Citywide, staff has also reduced the Information Systems, Support Services, Facilities budgets by $20,000, $5,000, and $3,000, respectively. Furthermore, staff is allocating an additional $75,000 in the Vehicles Fund to fund the replacement of a damaged vehicle in the Maintenance Division and to provide a replacement vehicle assigned to the Fire Chief due to mechanical issues associated with high mileage. Authorized Positions: There are no proposed changes to the Schedule of Authorized Positions, except for a minor modification to the pay range for the Human Services/Teen Manager position in order to make the position more competitive. The Schedule of Authorized Positions has been updated to reflect this change. Capita! Improvement Program: Due to the current economic environment, the midyear budget process has been modified to provide for adjustments to a few projects originally included the FY 2007-08 Capital I mprovement Program Budget. The proposed project budget adjustments/transfers are necessary to provide funds far: project administrative charges resulting from prolonged construction durations; - legal fees associated with lengthy property acquisition negotiations; - settlement of properly acquisitions; - additional construction funds for expenses related to resolving unknown underground obstructions; - compensation far added environmental monitoring and reporting; - modify the City funding requirement for the Western Bypass Alignment Study which, pursuant to agreement, is only 75% TUMF reimbursable. The programmed TUMF revenue for the Western Bypass Alignment Study will be reduced and subsidized with savings from other projects utilizing Capital Reserve Funds. As such, appropriation adjustment is being proposed. The recommended transfers are as follows: Current Revised Project Appropriation Appropriation Temecula Parkway Sign Replacement Field Operations Center Diaz Realignment Rancho California Road Widening 262, 841 2, 620,127 1, 457,150 1, 433, 609 132, 026 2, 354,12 7 1, 632, 965 1, 609, 609 Capital Reserves Allocated to Western Bypass Alignment Study n/a n/a Capital Reserves Proposed Transfers (130,815) (266,000) 175,815 176, 000 45, 000 Net change $ Furthermore, the City Attorney's office recently settled construction claims related to the construction of the Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park with Douglas E. Barnhart, (DEB) the prime contractor. The claim resolution includes finalizing the balance owed on the construction contract {retention), establishing final payment for extra work included in change orders, and establishing final payment for disputed extra work and all mark-ups associated with the change orders. An additional appropriation of $343,000 is necessaryta fullyfund the settlement and coverthe related legal fees. The additional appropriation will be comprised of $92,927 of interest earnings assigned to the project and $250,073 from Development Impact Fees {DIF) -Park and Recreation currently available in fund balance. The requested appropriation will be distributed as follows: Revised Additional Account No. Current Budget Appropriation Appropriation 210-190-173-5801 $ 15,900.00 $ 50,766.00 $ 34,866.00 210-190-173-5804 103,457.54 411,591.54 308,134.00 Totals $ 119,357.54 $ 462,357.54 $ 343,000.00 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed mid-year budget adjustments will result in a net increase of $138,804 to the General Fund reserves. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 08-_ Mid-Year Budget Amendment Resolution No. 08-_ Schedule of Authorized Positions 2007-08 General Fund Mid-Year Budget 2007-08 Gas Tax and State Transportation Funds Mid-Year Budget 2007-08 CDBG Funds Mid-Year Budget 2007-08 Law Enforcement Fund Mid-Year Budget 2007-08 Internal Service Funds Mid-Year Budget RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Section 2. That each year amid-year review is conducted of City operating budgets. Section 3. That the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules for the City's General Fund, Special Revenue and Internal Service Funds. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2007-08 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with the attached, hereto as Exhibit B, General Fund Mid-Year Budget. Section 5. That the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Gas Tax, State Transportation, CDBG, Law Enforcement Funds Annual Operating Budget are hereby amended in accordance with the attached, hereto as Exhibit C, Gas Tax, State Transportation, CDBG, Law Enforcement Funds Mid-Year Budget. Section 6. That the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Internal Service Funds Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached, hereto as Exhibit D, Internal Service Funds Mid-Year Budget. Section 7. That the Fiscal Year 2407-08 Capital Improvement Program is hereby amended in accordance with the attached, hereto as Exhibit E, Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA QOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City's Municipal Cade, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies. Section 2. The City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions. Section 3. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit A} is hereby adapted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective February 26, 2008, and may be thereafter amended. Section 5. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. Section 6. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26tj day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ EXHIBIT Q `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Building & Safety ADMINiSTRA TTVE A SSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR II BUILDING INSPECTOR III DEPUTYDIRECTOR, BLDG~SAFETY DIRECTOR, BU1T DING & SAFETY OFFICE A SSIST A NT OFFICE SPEC`L~LIST PLAN CI~L'I~ER.+'BLDG INSPECTOR Building a1i Safety Subtotals: Ci , Clerk ADIvIINiSTRA TIVE A SSISTANT CENTRAL SERVICES COORDINATOR CITY CLERK/DIR OF SUPPORT SERV DEPUTYDIR OF SUPPORT SERVICES MINUTE CLERK OFFICE A SSISTANT OFFICE ASSISTANT - AM OFFICE ASSISTANT - PM OFFICE SPECIALIST RECORDS MANAGER City Clerk Subtotals: City Council COUNCILMEMBER City Council Subtotals: City Managerlli~unan Res oim ces ADMINISTRA TTVE A SSISTANT (CM) ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER CITY MANA GER DEPUTY CITY MANA GER EXECUTIVE A SSISTANT HUMA N RESOURCES ANALYST MARKETING COORDINA TOR OFFICE SPECIALIST - IiR SENIOR HR A NALYST SENIOR MANA GENIINT ANALYST City ManagerlI-hunanResources Subtotals: Authorized ExemPtl Count lbfimmum Maadmian NonExempt 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 7.00 $4,135.06 $5,293.13 NE 1.00 $4,475.48 $5,719.43 NE 3.00 $3,418.01 $4,377.22 NE 1.00 $3,761.63 $4,815.20 NE 1.00 $6,218.40 $7,960.16 E 1.00 $7,4.16 $9,949.91 E 1.00 $2,293.89 $2,936.08 NE 2.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE 1.00 $4,475.48 $5,729.43 NE 1.00 $4;932.84 $6,313.13 E 1.00 $2,822.59 $3,613.36 NE 21.ao 21.ao 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $2,814.43 $3,601.68 NE 1.00 $7,4.16 $9,949.91 E 1.00 $5,977.43 $7,653.67 E 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $2,293.89 $2,936.08 NE 0.50 $2,293.89 $2,936.03 NE 0.50 $2,293.89 $2,936.08 NE 2.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE 1.00 $4,284.96 $5,519.51 E 10A0 10.00 5.00 $0.00 $860.00 E 5.00 5A0 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $10,516.08 $13,461.48 E 1.00 $0.00 $20,571.20 E 1.00 $10,40b.08 $13,319.94 E 1.00 $4,333.94 $5,548.12 E 1.00 $4,769.06 $6,103.76 E 1.00 $5,245.17 $6,715.52 E 1.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE 1.00 $5,245.17 $6,715.52 E 1.00 $5,793.79 $7,417.40 E 10A0 10A0 FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Connmuuty Sertices ADMINLSTR.~i TIVEA SSISTANT AQUATICS SUPERVISOR CULTURA L ARTS ADMINISTRA TOR CUSTODIAN DEPUTYDII2.OF COMMUNITY SVGS DEVELOPIvIINT SVCS ADIvIR~ISTRA TOR DIItECTOR OF COMMUNITYSERVICES FA CR1TY SERVICES MANAGER HUA4AN SERVICES/TEEN MANAGER LANDSCAPEINSPDCTOR LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER RIAIN"I'INANCE SUPT. - TCSD RIAIN"I'INANCE \VORI~"ER OFFICE SPECIALIST PARK RANGER PARKJLANDSCAPEMAINT SUPV PATRON SERVICES COORDINATOR RECT`E~ TION COORDINATOR RECREATION SUPERVISOR THEATER TECHNICA L COORDINA TOR THEATER TECHNICAL SUPERVISOR THEA THE NIA NA GER ConununitySer~ices Subtotals: Finance ACCOUNTANT A CCOUNTINGA SSISTANT A CCOUNTING 14IANAGER A CCOUNTING SPECIALIST ACCOUNTINGSPECIALIST -PAYROLL ADIVIINISTRATIVEA SSISTANT A SSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DIItDCTOR OF FINANCE FISCAL SERVICES IvIANAGER PURC~iA SING COORDTN~ TOR REVENUE AIA NA (~T. SENIOR DEBT ANALYST Finance Subtotals: Fire ADMINbSTRATTVEA SSISTANT OFFICE SPECZ~LIST SENIOR OFFICE SPECl<~LIST Fire Subtotals: Authorized Exempt! Count IbTuumiun Maldmiun NonExempt 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $4,064.89 $5,203.05 NE 1.00 $6,239.45 $7,988.22 E 3.00 $2,455.32 $3,143.12 NE 1.00 $7,437.28 $9,519.43 E 1.00 $6,257.00 $8,009.30 E 1.00 $9,Zb'3.13 $11,882.31 E 1.00 $3,677.87 $4,737.51 NE 1.00 $4,671.05 $5,9'78.12 NE 2.00 $3,483.51 $4,456.75 NE 4.00 $3,437.91 $4,398.28 NE 1.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 E 1.00 $5,911.91 $7,567.11 E 4.00 $2,919.70 $3,737.3b NE 2.00 $4,178.36 $5,350.45 NE 3.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE 2.00 $3,522. $4,509.47 NE 1.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 E 1.00 $3,483.51 $4,456.75 NE 1.00 $3,319.75 $4,248.52 NE 1.00 $6,239.45 $788.22 E 3.00 $4,064.89 $5,203.05 NE 1.00 $4,002.89 $5,124.69 NE 1.00 $5,793.79 $7,417.40 E 1.00 $3,651.98 $4,673.15 NE 1.00 $3,483.51 $4,456.75 NE 1.00 $3,651.98 $4,673.15 NE 1.00 $5,039.29 $6,450.76 E 43A0 43.D0 1.00 $4,221.b4 $5,404.24 NE 1.00 $2,130.21 $3,494.05 NE 1.00 $5,793.79 $7,417.40 E 3.00 $3,158.32 $4,040.30 NE 1.00 $3,158.32 $4,040.30 NE 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $7,370.60 $9,436.37 E 2.00 $2,822.59 $3,613.36 NE 1.00 $9,283.13 $11,882.31 E 1.00 $6,472.21 $8,235.37 E 1.00 $3,158.32 $4,040.30 NE 1.00 $5,793. i'9 $7,41740 E 1.00 $5,793.79 $7,41740 E 1tiA0 16.00 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE 1.00 $2,822.59 $3,613.36 NE 3.00 3.00 FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET SCHEDULE OF AUTHQRIZED P{?SITIONS Airthorized Exempt/ Informai~iaa- Systems Count Afinummi A7aximum NonExempt ADMINISTRATIVEASSISTANT 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE DIRECTOROFINFORMATIONSYSTEM 1.00 $7,774.16 $9,949.91 E GLS ADIvIINISTRATOR 1.00 $5,357.47 $6,855.92 E GL5 ANALYST 1.00 $4,078.91 $5,221.75 NE LS. ADMINISTRATOR 2.00 $5,357.47 $6,855.92 E INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECLALIST 1.00 $4,387.74 $5,617.14 NE SR GiS PROGRAIvIIvIER 1.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 NE SR ZS. SPECIALIST 2.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 NE W EBIvIA STER 1.00 $4,078.91 $5,221.75 NE Information Systems Subtotals: 11A0 11.00 Planning ADMINISTRATIVEASSISTANT 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE ASSISTANT CTTYMANAGER 1.00 $10,516.08 $13,461.48 E ASSISTANT PLANNER 1.00 $4,43.86 $5,433.50 NE ASSOCIATEPLANNEft 5.00 $4,813.52 $6,159.90 NE CODEENFORCE[vIENT OFFICER 2.00 $361.93 $5,072.06 NE CODEENFORCE(VIENTOFFICERII 2.00 $4,359.68 $5,579.70 NE DEVFI,OPNIENT PROC COORDINATOR 1.00 $4,360.82 $5,582.04 NE DIRECTOR OF PIA NNING 1.00 $8,609.38 $11,020.22 E JUNIORPI,ANNER 2.00 $3,537.39 $4,528.14 NE OFFICE A SSISTANT 2.00 $2,293.89 $2,93b.08 NE PRINCIPALPI,ANNER 2.00 $6,989.27 $8,947.41 E SENIOR OFFICE SPECIALIST 2.00 $2,822.59 $3,613.36 NE SENIORPLANNER 2.00 $6,079.20 $7,781.18 E Planning Subtotals: 24A0 24A0 Police MANAGIIVIII~]TANALYST 1.00 $5,?A5.17 $6,715.52 E Police Subtotals: 1.00 lA0 Public Works ADMINLSTRATI~'EASSLSTANT 1.00 $3,279.97 $4,198.25 NE ASSE5SIYIEN'f DISTRICT SPECIALIST 1.00 $4,743.32 $6,074.52 NE ASSLSTANTENCiII~IEFR 7.00 $4,743.32 $6,074.52 NE ASSISTANT SIGNALTECFINICTAN 1.00 $3,437.91 $4,398.28 NE A SSOCL4 TE ENGNEEEt 10.00 $5,578.54 $7,140.17 E CONSTRUCTIONM.4NAG~2 1.00 $5,677.19 $7,514.16 E DEPUTYDIl2DCTORPUBLdCld~ORKS 2.00 $8,323.93 $10,654.11 E DII2OFPUBWORKS/CITYENG 1.00 $10,406.08 $13,319.94 E ENCiQIEII2INGTECHNiCIAN 1.00 $3,205.11 $4,103.49 NE JUNIOR ENGINEER 1.00 $3,687.04 $4,71994 NE LEAD IvL~1NTENANCE WORKER 5.00 $3,437.91 $4,39828 NE MAINTENANCESUPERVISOR 2.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 E MAINTENANCESUPT. - P/W 1.00 $5,911.91 $7,567.11 E MAINTENANCEWORKER 6.00 $2,919.70 $3,737.36 NE MANAG4~1VIENTANALYST 1.00 $5,2A5.17 $6,715.52 E OFFICE A SSISTA NT 3.00 $2; 93.89 $2,936.08 NE OFFICE SPECLALIST 2.00 $2,474.04 $3,166.51 NE FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Continued PRINCIPALENC~IEER PROPERTY ~ t~N'T PUBLIC \1'ORh.S INSPECTOR SINIOR INC~]I~R SEtVIOR PUBLIC W ORKS INSPECTOR SEPIIOR SIGNAL TECIiNICIAN SPECIALPROTI~JCTS EPICaNEII2 SR CIP SPFCL9Ll5T Public«''orks Subtotals: Redevelopment ADIvIINLSTP.ATIVEA SSISTA NT MANA GFMEPIT ANALYST Redevelopment Subtotals: Authorized Exempt/ Caul I4finimun R7a~nnun NonExempt 3.00 $7,492.25 $9,589.63 E 1.00 $5,578.54 $7,140.17 E 3.00 $4,169.00 $5,336.40 NE 3.00 $6,577.51 $8,419.86 E 1.00 $2,822.59 $3,613.36 NE 4.00 $4,793.65 $6,136.54 NE 1.00 $4,812.34 $6,158.74 NE 1.00 $5,578.54 $7,140.17 E 0.75 $4,143.48 $5,303.98 NE 63.75 63.75 1.00 $3,2.97 $4,198.25 NE 1.00 $8,609.38 $11,020.22 E 1.00 $5,245.17 $6,715.52 E 3.00 3.00 Totals: Building R Safety City Clerk City Council City lblanager Comnnmity S er~ices Finance Fire L~formation Sys terns Planning Pdice R~blic Works Redevelopment Total ofAufhorizedPositions: 210.75 21 AO 10.00 5.00 10.00 43.00 16.00 3.00 11A0 24 AO 1.00 63.75 3.00 210.75 `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ DETAIL BREAKpOtNN OF AUTH{?RIZEp PC?SITI{?NS BY DEPARTMENT TILE ~~~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ ~ INC. 1989 _ ~~~ )ID TRADITIONS, Nr ~ti~ (1E~I~c~R'T1JNI71FS" GENFT2AL FUND Authorized Authorized 1YFid-Year 2007-08 Changes 2007-08 CITY COLINCII, Councilmembers 5.00 0.00 5.00 CITY MANAG~[2 Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant City Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy City Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant to the City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Human Resources Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Marketing Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Human Resources Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 SeniorlVIanagement Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 10.00 0.00 10.00 CTTY CLERK Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 City Clerk/Director of Support Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Support. Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Minute Clerk 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 2.00 0.00 2.00 5eI110I' ReCOrdB COOrdlIlatOI' 1.00 O.OO 1.00 Total 8.00 0.00 8.00 FINANCE Accountant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Accounting Assistant 2.00 0.00 2.00 Accounting A4anager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Accounting Specialist 4.00 0.00 4.00 Administrative Assistant 0.75 0.00 0.75 Assistant Finance Director 1.00 0.00 1.00 Business License Specialist/Cashier 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director of Finance 1.00 0.00 1.00 Fiscal Services Manager 0.75 0.00 0.75 Purchasing Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 RevenueManager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Debt Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 15.50 0.00 15.50 8 TI IE ~~ ~ ~. V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ INC. 1989 m `~ ~~i )ID 7'RAUfTiuhs, X11 w (1rPc~Ki i1N(t1ES" COl~IDIUNTI'Y DEVI3.OP~IINT-PLANNING Authorized Authorized I1+Iid-Year 2007-08 Changes 2007-OS Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant city Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Planner 1.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Planner 6.00 0.00 6.00 Code Enforcement C1fficer I 2.00 0.00 2.00 Code Enforcement Officer II 2.00 0.00 2.00 Deputy City Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 Development Processing Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director of Planning 1.00 0.00 1.00 Junior Planner 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 2.00 0.00 2.00 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Principal Planner 2.00 0.00 2.00 Senior Qffice Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Planner 2.00 0.00 2.00 Total 24.00 0.00 24.00 COMIViUNTTYDEUELOPNIINT- BUII.DING&SAFETY Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 BuildingInspectorII 7.00 0.00 7.00 Building Inspector III 1.00 0.00 1.00 Community Development Technician 3.00 0.00 3.00 Community Development Technician II 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Building Official 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director ofBuilding and Safety 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 2.00 0.00 2.00 Plan Checker/ Building Inspector 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Building Inspector 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 21.00 0.00 21.00 COMILIUNTTYDEVELOPNIINT -LAND DEVFLOPNIINT Administrative Assistant 0.25 0.00 0.25 Assistant Engineer 3.00 0.00 3.00 Associate Engineer 2.00 0.00 2.00 Deputy Director of Public 1xlorks 0.50 0.00 0.50 Director ofPublic Works/City Engineer 0.30 0.00 0.30 Engineering Tech III 1.00 0.00 1.00 Junior Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 0.83 0.00 0.83 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Public Works Inspector 2.00 0.00 2.00 Senior Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 1.50 0.00 1.50 Special Projects Associate Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 15.38 0.00 15.38 TILE ~~~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ ~ INC. 1989 _ ~'~ )ID TRADITIONS, N[:W OPPORTUNPt7ES" Authorized Authorized 1YLid-Year 2007-08 Changes 2007-08 PUBLIC WORKS Administrative Assistant 0.50 0.00 0.50 Assistan Signal Technician 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Engineer 2.00 0.00 2.00 Deputy Director of Public Works 0.50 0.00 0.50 Director ofPublic W orks/City Engineer 0.40 0.00 0.40 Landscape Inspector 0.25 0.00 0.25 Lead Maintenance Worker 5.00 0.00 5.00 Maintenance Superintendent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 2.00 0.00 2.00 Maintenance Worker 6.00 0.00 6.00 Management Analyst 0.50 0.00 0.50 Office Assistant 1.84 0.00 1.84 Principal Engineer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior c?ffice Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 Senior Signal Technician 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 25.49 0.00 25.49 PUBLIC WORKS - CIP ADMQVISTRATION AdministrativeAssistant 0.25 0.00 0.25 Assessment District Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Assistant Engineer 3.00 0.00 3.00 Associate Engineer 6.00 0.00 6.00 Construction Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Public Works 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director of Public WorkslCity Engineer 0.30 0.00 0.30 Management Analyst 0.50 0.00 0.50 Office Assistant 0.33 0.00 0.33 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Principal Engineer 2.00 0.00 2.00 Property Agent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Public Works Inspector 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior CJP Specialist 0.75 0.00 0.75 Senior Engineer 2.00 0.00 2.00 Senior Public Works Inspector 2.00 0.00 2.00 Total 23.13 0.00 23.13 POLICE Management Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 1.00 0.00 1.00 FIl2E Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 3.00 0.00 3.00 General FYrnd Total 151.50 0.00 151.50 10 THE ~1,~1 1'~ ~ U LJa~ I~'Y -~~~` ~ ~ ~ LL _ _~ ~ _ ~ INC. 1989 ~~~ )ID TRADITIUN~, Ni ~ti' OI'hUKTllNI77FS~ COnI1~ILIlVIT~" S ER~TCES Authorized Authorized lYlid-Year 2007-08 Changes 2007-08 PARKS AND RFiCRE.ATION Admaiisttative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Aquatics Supervisor 1.00 0.00 1.00 CulturalAtts Administrator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Custodian 1.00 0.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Community Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Development Services Administrator 0.85 0.00 0.85 Human Services/Teen Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director of Community Services 1.00 0.00 1.00 Landscape Inspector 0.75 0.00 0.75 Lead Maintenance Worker 3.40 0.00 3.40 Maintenance Superintendent 0.70 0.00 0.70 Maintenance Supervisor 0.70 0.00 0.70 IldaintenanceWorker 3.00 0.00 3.00 lUluseum Services 11r1anager Z.00 0.00 2.00 Office Specialist 2.30 0.00 2.30 Park Ranger 2.00 0.00 2.00 Parks/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 0.70 0.00 0.70 Patron Services CootYiinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Superintendent 1.00 0.00 1.00 Recreation Supervisor 3.00 0.00 3.00 SeniorLandscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 SeniorManagementAnalyst 0.50 0.00 0.50 SeniorRecreation Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 TheaterManager 1.00 0.00 1.00 TheaterTechnical Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 TheaterTechnical Supervisor 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 34.40 0.00 34.40 SERVICE LF.'VII. B SeniorNlanagementAnaytyst 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0. os SII2VICE LEVLZ. C Landscape Inspector 0.90 0.00 0.90 Maintenance Superintendent 0.05 0.00 0.05 Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 ice Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Parks/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 0.20 0.00 0.20 SeniorLandscape Inspector 0.50 0.00 0.50 SeniorManagementAnalyst 0.30 0.00 0.30 Tota! 2.75 0.00 2.75 SERVICE LEVEC. D Development Services Administrator 0.15 0.00 0.15 Office Specialist 0.10 0.00 0.10 SeniorManagementAnalyst 0.15 0.00 0.15 Total 0.40 0.00 0.40 SERVICE LEVE[. L Landscape Inspector 0.10 0.00 0.10 Lead Maintenance Worker 0.10 0.00 0.10 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor 0.10 0.00 0.10 Total 0.30 0.00 0.30 Community Services Total 37.90 0.00 37.90 11 TILE ~~~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ ~ INC. 1989 _ "~ )ID TRADITIONS, New OPIrOKIUNRIFS~ IlV'TII2NAL SERVICEFUNDS Authorized Authorized ith ct-Year 2007-OS Changes 200;-08 INSURANCE Administrative Assistant 0.25 0.00 0.25 Fiscal Services Manager 0.25 0.00 0.25 Total 0.50 0.00 0.50 INFORMATION SYSTF.1Y15S Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Director of Information Systems 1.00 0.00 1.00 QS Administrator 1.00 0.00 1.00 CiiS Analyst 1.00 0.00 1.00 Information Systems Administrator 2.00 0.00 2.00 Information Systems Specialist 1.00 0.00 1.00 Senior GiS Programmer 1.00 0.00 1.00 Serrior•Information Systems Specialist 2.00 0.00 2.00 Webmaster 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 11.00 0.00 11.00 SUPPORT SERVICES Central Services Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 Total 2.00 0.00 2.00 FACILITIES Custodian 2.00 0.00 2.00 Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.00 0.00 1.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Maintenance Superintendent 0.25 0.00 0.25 Maintenance Supervisor 0.30 0.00 0.30 Maintenance Worker 0.50 0.00 0.50 Office Specialist 0.30 0.00 0.30 Total 4.85 0.00 4.85 Internal Service Funds Total 18.35 0.00 18.35 1~ "OI.D TRADITIONS, NrW OPPORTUNI~IF.S~~ RIDEVII.OPl~'IINT AC;F:NCY A dministrativ e A s sistant Director ofHousing/Redevelopment Management Analyst Total RIDEVII.OPIY7INT A dministrativ e A s sistant Director of HousinglRedevelopment Management Analyst Total Rede~'elopment Agency Total TOTAL AUTHORTIID POSITIONS Authorized Authorized lYfid-Year 2007-08 Changes 2007-08 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.75 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.75 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 210.75 0.00 210.75 13 `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ EXHIBIT B `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ GENERAL FUND FY24~7-~8 M~dYEAR BUDGET TILE ~~ ~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ INC. 1989 _ "Oi.:~ l itnir, ~ iota, N1.w Ut~i~c~hi ur:~ ~ iES,~ SUMMARY QF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-6o-Date Re~isad Increase Inaease Ach~als Budget Ach~als B,adget (D~rea~) ib~rease) Total Redenues 67,748,685 65,792,375 29,527,157 63,461,379 (2,330,996} -3.6% Expendihares by Dept: City Coundl 416,000 507,945 216,665 502,945 (5,000) -1.2% Community Support 338,166 281,400 98,757 281,400 - 0.0% CilyNkmager 1,174,139 1,294,378 571,194 1,284,378 (10,000) -0.8% EaonomicDevelopm~t 862,554 928,164 399,118 893,164 (35,000) -3.7% City Clerk 1,014,197 1,044,518 461,994 1,039,518 (5,000) -0.5% City At6orney 681,011 760,000 431,511 710,000 (50,000) -6.3% Fna~oe 1,959,739 2,175,919 955,968 2,150,919 (25,000) -1.2% Human Resources 627,960 727,119 299,970 717,119 (10,000) -1.6% Planning 3,277,309 4,086,941 1,762,752 4,046,941 (40,000) -1.0% B.ailding & Safety 2,794,729 2,724,938 1,172,041 2,658,938 (66,000) -2.1% Land Developm~t 2,168,543 2,073,847 930,380 2,056,047 (17,800) -0.7% Public Works 6,067,394 7,893,737 3,421,105 7,659,737 (234,000) -3.0% CIP Adrrin 2,535,588 2,865,251 1,212,291 2,850,251 (15,000) -0.5% FENIA -Storm Damage 36,428 90,000 48,718 60,000 (30,000) -69.6% Police 17,685,965 20,559,785 8,227,835 20,342,785 (217,000) -1.2% Fre 4,105,366 5,779,042 1,421,234 4,979,042 (800,000) -15.0% Animd Control 159,597 170,000 85,062 170,000 - 0.0% Non-Departmental: REST Contribution 6,828,854 8,012,086 4,213,664 7,492,086 (520,000) -7.6% Reti tea Nadi cd Contribution - 400,000 - - (400,000) -57.1 Salmi Tax Sharing - Redhavk 500,000 500,000 137,967 584,000 84,000 16.8% Properly Tax Admin 4,572 50,000 - 50,000 - 0.0% Old Town R~td Properly 16,701 - - - - 0.0% CFD 88-12 Tax 1,582,333 1,630,000 139,212 1,556,000 (74,000) -2.3% Tonal Expenditures 54,837,145 64,555,069 26,207,439 62,085,269 (2,469,800) -5.4% Excess of Revenues Over (Under)Expenditures 12,911,540 1,237,306 3,319,718 1,376,110 138,804 Operating Transfers Out: Capitd Projects 6,969,000 4,899,393 663,682 4,899,393 - Total Operating Transfers Out 6,969,000 4,899,393 663,682 4,899,393 - Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 5,942540 (3,662,087) 2,656,036 (3,523,283} 138,804 TILE ~~ ~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ INC. 1989 _ "Oi.:~ l itnir, ~ iota, Nr.w Ut~t~c~hi ur:~ ~ iES,~ SUMMARY QF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FY2OO7-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET zoo6-o7 zao7-oa zoo7-o8 2007-~ Audited Oarrent Year-~-Dad Revi~d Actuals Budget Actuals Budget Find Balance, Beg. of Year 37,989,794 43,932,334 43,932,334 43,932,334 Revenues 67,748,685 65,792,375 29,527,157 63,461,379 E~enditures (54,837,145) (64,555,069) (26,207,439) (62,085,269) Operating Transfers Out (6,9,000) (4,899,393) (663,682) (4,899,393) Estimated Budget Savings - - - - F~.nd Balance, End of Yea- 43,932,334 40,270,247 46,588,370 40,409,051 Detail of Fund Balance: Reserved for long-term advarxe to RDA 1,784,551 870,176 870,176 870,176 Reser~~ed for deposits a-,d pr~aid items 110,881 107,959 107,959 107,959 Reserved for inventory 3,747 3,586 3,58n 3,586 Reserved for comprehersive annual leave 1,415,494 1,465,426 1,465,42Y 1,465,426 Lhreserved: Cesig-~ated for continuing appropriatia-i 200,543 200,543 200,543 200,543 Designated for economic unoertainry (20% of Appropriations) 10,7,429 12,911,014 12,911,014 12,417,054 Designated for retiree I~nefits 3,574,851 - 3,572,029 - Cesigrrated for open spare 506,226 506,226 506,226 506,226 Cesignated for Dutch Villages 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 ~signated for LiL~rry Quarry EIR 266,908 266,908 266,90 266,908 Lhdesignat~l 24,951,705 23,788,409 26,534,502 24,421,173 43,932,334 40,270,247 46,538,3701 40,40x.051 17 ACCT NO 001 GENERAL FIND FY 06-07 ACTUALS FY 07-08 YT17 @ 12/31J07 FY 07-08 CIRRENT ESTIMATES FY07-08 REVISED ESTIMATES CHANGE IN ESTIMATES CHANGE DEPT 161 PLANNING -Various 794,855 383,013 1,141,107 558,831 (582,276) -51.03% DEPT 162 BUILDING & SAFETY -Various 2,581,603 994,740 1,944,192 1,944,192 - DEPT 163 LAND DEVELC~IvENT -Various 1,861,659 479,816 1,884,020 787,815 (1,096,205) -58.18% DEPT 170 PCLICE 4051 -Dcnations Every 15 Mnutes 4055 -Parking Gtations 199,211 75,167 160,000 138,000 (22,000) -13.75% 9059 -Fingerprinting Fee 63,673 31,269 62,000 62,000 - 4060 -MS'rellanecus 29,592 18,807 31,000 44,000 13,000 41.94% 4067 -Vehicle Irrpaund Fees 148,106 61,384 162,000 115,000 (47,000) -29.01% 4069 -Taxi Fees 3,020 970 3,000 2,000 (1,000) -33.33% 4076 -Re+mbursements 118,918 74,252 130,000 1,000 - 4083 -Chants 54,977 - 25,661 - (25,661) -100.00% -Various Perrrits 2,090 1,514 4225 -OTS Grants 26,874 106,098 102,994 59,000 (43,994) -42.72% 4276 -CAmrruniry Action Patrd 2,167 2,166 2,166 DEPT 171 FIRE -Various 921,5 450,107 660,283 997,114 2,831 43.44% 4083 -Grants 7,766 4,000 DEPT 199 NGYJ-DEPARTMENTAL 4010 -Property Tax 4,691,470 2,802,390 5,530,600 5,530,000 - 4012 -Property Tax (lhsecured) 234,378 210,926 106,000 106,000 - 4013 -Supplemental Tax- AB 2345 1,558,794 446,224 500,000 700,000 200,000 40.OJ% 4016 -Property Transfer Tax 770,6 288,950 7,000 500,000 (200,000) -28.57% 4017 -Boding Fee Rc4mburserr~nt 1~i,785 - - - - 4018 -Franchise Fees 3,033,014 1,016,634 2,931,000 3,127,000 196,000 6.69% 40~ -Transient Cxcupancy Tax 2,284,168 1,215,247 2,5~,C00 2,50J,C00 - 4023 -Sales and Use Tax -Triple Flip 8,033,336 3,126,144 7,8,320 6,914,840 (940,480) -11.97% 4024 -Sales and Use Tax -State of Calif 22,090,691 8,878,210 23,565,9b0 21,719,940 (1,846,020) -7.83% 4028 -Homeowner Prq~erry Tax Relief 76,271 29,~i4 78,000 78,000 - 4043 -MOG~r Vehide in Lieu -Triple pip 5,954,671 3,357,301 6,200,000 6,714,601 514,601 8.30% 4046 -Nbh~r Vehicle in Lieu -State of Calif 1,521,73) 296,694 1,100,000 900,000 (200,000) -18.18% 9047 -Vehicle Code Fines 1,107,963 374,643 1,200,000 800,000 (400,000) -33.33% 9053 -Bids & Proposals 6,800 935 7,000 7,000 - 4056 -Business Licenses 344,182 46,195 308,000 308,000 - 4059 -Right of Way Advertisng 102,570 42,000 100,000 8,000 (20,000) -20.00% Various -Miscellaneous 19,948 4,199 12,0 12,000 - 4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense 72,314 30 - - - 4065+4545 -Investrr~ntlnterest 3,471,794 1,694,705 1,649,000 2,394,526 795,526 45.21% 4075 -Rentallncome 27,565 - - - - 4076 -Reimbursements 384,420 902,201 897,000 976,935 79,935 8.91% 4082 -Redevelopment Agency 225,000 55,000 110,000 110,000 - 4083 -Capital Irrproderr~nt Program 1,803,818 977,748 2,152,838 2,152,838 - 4090 -Operating Transfers-in 2,811,193 1,024,130 1,822,500 2,109,581 287,081 15.x% 4094 -Lease Income 8,701 4,375 - - - 4900 -Financing Reimbursement 162,500 100,608 162,500 181,000 18,500 11.38% 4902 -Pr iB - - - 750 000 750 000 TOTAL GENERAL FIND 67,748,685 29,527,157 65,792,375 63,461,379 (2,330,996) -3.54% GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL FYZ007-a8 MID-YEAR OPERATING BUDGET `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ EXHIBIT C `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ FY2007-06 MID-YEAR BUDGET GAS TAx FUNt~ STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND CDBG FUND LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNC) `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNi~IF.s~~ Gas Tax FuNd Total Revenues Total Expendihares Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendir~res Operating Tra-~sfers Out 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Acbaals Budget Acbaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 1,744,839 1,722,500 894,011 1,722,500 - 1,744,839 1,722,500 894,011 1,722,500 (1,631,850) (1,722,500) (789,390) (1,914,440) 191,940 11.1% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendibares and Operating Transfers Out 112,989 104,621 (191,940) (191,940) Fund Balance, beg. of Year 78,951 191,940 191,940 191,940 Fund Bala-~ce, End of Year 191,940 191,940 296,561 (Oi 21 TILE ~~ ~ '~.V 1.~~ _ _~ ~ _ INC. 1989 _ "Oi.:~ l itnir, ~ iota, Nr.w Ut~t~c~hi ur:i ~ iES,~ STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Actiaals Budget Achaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Totd Revenues 586,504 - - - - 100.0% Total Expendibares - - - - - Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendibares 586,504 - - - - 100.0% Operating Transfers Out*: To General Fund (994,819) (6,821) 6,821 100.0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) ExpendiU.ares and Operating Transfers Out (408,315) - - (6,821) 6,821 Fund Balances, Bea. of Year 415,136 6,821 6,821 6,821 Fund Balances, End of Year 6.821 c.)'[i b,~.~i - 1L `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNi~IF.s~~ CDB G FUND Total Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Operating Transfers Out*: CIP Fund Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balances, Beg . of Year Fund Balances, End of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposes Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase IncreasA Acua~ls Budget Acbaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 112,022 2,120,808 112,890 2,120,808 63,337 63,346 20,994 63.346 48,685 2,057,462 91,896 2,057,462 (48,725) (2,057,462) (91.896) (2,057,462) (40) 40 2~' `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNi~IF.s~~ LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND Totd Revenues Total Expendibares Excess of Revenues Over (Under ) Expendibares Ope~ating Transfers Out*: To Genera Fund Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendibar~ and Operating Transfers Out Fund Bel anoes, Beg . of Year Fund B~lanoes, End of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Acua~ls Budget (becrease) (Decrease) 182,809 100,000 188,320 188,320 88,320 88.3% 182,809 1.00,000 188,320 188,320 88,320 88.3% (184,483) (100.000) (188,320) (188,320) (88,320) -88.3% (1,674) 1,674 c4 `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNi~IF.s~~ GAS TAX FUJD REVENI.E DETAIL FY 2007-08 Mid Year Gperating Budget ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 100 GAS TAX FIND ACTUALS YID @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investment interest 5,351 4,425 - - 4700 -Gas Tax 2106 395,708 194,542 372,000 372,000 - 4701 -Gas Tax 2105 571,831 299,075 580,000 580,000 - 4702 -Gas Tax 2107 764,949 395,969 763,000 763,000 - 4709 -Gas Tax 2107.5 7 500 - 7 500 7 500 - TOTAL GAS TAX FIND 1 744 839 894 011 1722 500 1722 500 - STATE TRANSPORTATION FIND REVENI.E DETAIL FY 2007-08 Mid Year C~erating Budget ACCT FY ~-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FYCl7-08 CHANGE °lo CURRENT REVISED IN NO 101 ST. TRANSPORTATIGYJ FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 21,486 - - - - 4160 -Traffic Con es6cn Relief 565 018 - - - - TOTAL ST. TRANSPORT. FUND 586 504 - - - - 100.00% CCIvIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENI.E DETAIL FY 2007-08 Mid Year Oaerating Budget ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE OJRRENT REVISED IN NO 140 CDBG FUVD ACTUALS YTD @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 1 - - - - 4081 -Communi Develo ment Block Gran 112 022 112 890 2 120 808 2 120 808 - TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND 112 023 112 890 2 120 808 2 120 808 - LAW ENFORCEMENT FIND REVENI.E DETAIL FY 2007-03 Mid Year Gperating Budget ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 160 LAW ENFORCEMENT FIND ACTU4LS YTD @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIP~IATES CHANGE 4085 -AB3229 COPS 182 809 188 320 100 000 188 320 - 88.32°l0 TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND 182 809 188 320 100 000 188 320 - 88.32% `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ EXHIBIT C} `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FY2007-08 MID-YEAR BUDGET "OI.D TRADITIONS, (VfW OPPURTUNf ~iF.s~~ Total Revenues by Fund Insurance Vehi d es Information Systems Support Services Facil i U es Totu Re~~H u_r~=; Total Expenditures by Fund Insura-~ce Vehicles Information Systems Support Services Facil i U es Totu Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Operating Transfers In (Out): Generu Fund (Vehides) Excess of Re~renues and Operating Transfers Over (Under) Expendibares Retained Eanings, Beg. of Year Retuned Earnings, End of Year INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Yea-to-Date Re:~ised Increase Increase Acro_ials Budget Acbaus EJudg=t (Decrease) (Decrease) 644,622 831,100 634 831,100 - 0.0% 363,630 354,330 4,385 354,330 - 0.0% 2,277,808 2,480,600 1,125,046 2,480,600 - 0.0% 347,879 432,300 - 432,300 - 0.0% 648,520 760,800 295,780 760,800 - 0.0% 4,282,459 4,859,130 1.425,845 9,859,130 608,058 831,102 346,903 831,102 - 0.0% 313,024 300,524 163,154 300,524 - 0.0% 2,239,847 2,510,979 1,172,378 2,490,979 (20,000) -0.8% 307,806 409,462 157,532 404,462 (5,000) -1.2% 651,047 762,775 303,514 759,775 (3,000) -0.4% 4,119,782 4,814,842 2,143,481 4,786,842 (28,000) 162,677 44,288 (717,636) 72,288 28,000 162,677 44,288 (717,636) 72,288 28,000 4,740,240 4,902,917 4,902,917 4,902,917 4,902,917 4,947,205 4,185,281 4,975,205 `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNi71F.s~~ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL FY 2007-~ Mid Year Operating Budget ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO x10INSURANCEFUND ACTUALS YTD@ 12/3J/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investmentlnterest 54,067 27,9 50,7 x,700 - 4076 -Charges fcr Services 589,6 314,072 78J,400 7LL,400 - 4086 -S ecial Event Insurance Fees 925 634 TOTAL INSURANCE FUND 644 622 342 676 831 100 ~ i, ii=~~_~ - ACCT FY 0607 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 310 VEHICLES FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 9~0 -Miscellaneous Nm Taxable 8 - - - - 9065+4545 -InvestmentInterest 21,212 10,273 2(1,430 20,430 - 9076 -Charger, t_r Jar,"i_~_: 326,250 169,477 333,900 ~s3,2~"i0 - 4550 -Gain or ~ Gi _ _~_,,I _t ~sseJs 16 160 4385 TOTAL'JEHIdE~FiJfJD 363630 184135 3543 ~5},~~~_~ - ACCT FY 0607 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE OJRRENT REVISED IN NO 3201NF0 SYSTEMS FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12/31/07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4050 -PayTelephone Revenue 58 28 - - - 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 27,427 12,254 25,OCrJ 25,000 - ur;r_ ~J~,~~__ f_~ ~~ i_~_ ~5~~ s~3 11_5~~~ _gSSr~=rS ~-}SSr~=~_~ T~~T~,L IfJF~~ ~ ~ ~TEi l'~ FUf,1G =i_r=' 1 1~, ~~',_', _ 4_~_i r~5i5 4 i i r~ u5 ACCT FY 0607 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 33~ SUPPORT SERVICES FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12i3]J07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -InvestmentInterest 9,617 5,390 8,6~ 8,600 - 9076 -Charges for Services 329,470 158,752 423,700 423,700 - 4550 -Gain on Leis o:a) of ?s:er_: 8 792 - - TOT.~L SIIF'F+~~RT SER'':+Ii~S FUfVD ?A7879 1H4 142 4~2 ~iiii 432 300 ACCT FY 0607 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE go CURRENT REVISED IN NO 340 FACILITIES FUND ACTUALS YTD 12 3 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -InvsstmentInterest 3,773 1,~3 3,400 3,400 - 4076 -Char es for Services 644 747 295 780 757 400 757 400 - TOTAL FACILITIES FUND 643,520 297,663 760,8 760,800 - `OLD TRADITIONS, NrW OPPURTUNI~IF.S~~ EXHIBIT E CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FY2007-08 MID-YEAR CAPITAL INIPROVEMEI~lT BUDGETADJUSTNIENTS roject Account Number ccount Name Current Appropriation Revised Appropriation Capital Reserves Transfer in/{out} Temecula Parkway Sign Replacement 210-165-641-5801 Admin $ 18,191.00 $ 18,191. 00 $ - 210-165-641-5802 Design & Environmental 18,900.00 - {18,900. 00} 210-165-641-5804 Construction 214,500.00 113,835. 00 {100,665. 00} 210-165-641-5806 CIP-MHSCP 11,250.00 - {11,250. 00} Subtotal 262,841.00 132,026 .00 {130,815. 00} Field Operations Center 210-165-742-5800 FF&E 388,655.06 388655 .06 - 210-165-742-5801 Admin 63,500.00 18,500 .00 {45,000. 00} 210-165-742-5802 Design 39,817.91 39817 .91 - 210-165-742-5804 Construction 2,126,698.70 1,905,698 .70 {221,000. 00} 210-165-742-5805 Construction Engineering 1,455.25 1455 .25 - Subtotal 2,620,126.92 2,354,126 .92 {266,000. 00} aiaz Realignment 210-165-632-5700 Land Acquisition 23, 000. 00 123665 100, 665. 00 210-165-632-5801 Admin 204, 291. 00 2794 41 75, 150. 00 210-165-632-5804 Construction 1,200, 992. 73 1200992 .73 - 210-165-632-5805 Construction Engineering 28, 866. 25 28866 .25 - Subtotal 1,457, 149. 98 1, 632,964 .98 175, 815. 00 Rancho California Road Wi dening {Old Town Front to I-15) 210-165-624-5801 Admin 69, 266. 00 144,266 .00 75, 000. 00 210-165-624-5804 Construction 1,332, 435. 10 1,432,435 .10 100, 000. 00 210-165-624-5805 Construction Engineering 31, 907. 50 1, 000. 00 Subtotal 1,433, 608.60 1, 576, 701 .10 176, 000. 00 Western Bypass Alignment Study Projects Subtotal n/a n/a 45, 000. 00 $ - "The net $45,000 reflects the Cap Reserve funds being transferred to the Western Bypass Alignment Study Project. Because the TUMF revenues for that project are being reduced by an equal amount the account balance remains the same. PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL SPORTS PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET Revised Additional Account No. Current Budget Appropriation Appropriation 210-190-173-5801 $ 15,900.00 $ 50,766.00 $ 34,866.00 210-190-173-5804 103,457.54 411,591.54 308,134.00 Totals $ 119,357.54 $ 462,357.54 $ 343,000.00 Note: The additional appropriation is being funded with $92,927 in interest earnings assigned to the project and $250,073 in DIF - Park and Recreation. ITEM NCB. 5 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to Contract with Meyer & Associates PREPARED BY: Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement with Meyer & Associates in the amount of $47,540, plus 10% contingency of $4,754. BACKGROUND: On November 22, 2005 the City and TCSD approved an agreement with Meyer & Associates for the development of a conceptual master plan and plans and specifications for the Temecula Community Center (TCC) expansion project in the amount of $138,880. The Board of Directors has approved a conceptual master plan for the TCC expansion and the relocation of the historic Escalier house and barn. On July 10, 2007 Council approved the first amendment to the agreement in the amount of $70,052.50 for additional scope of work associated with grading plans and engineering costs. The second amendment before you provides a scope and cost associated with the plans and specifications for the tenant improvements needed for the Escalier house and barn after they are relocated to the TCC property. The improvements to the TCC area will greatly enhance our ability to provide a full range of human service programs in one location within the City. FISCAL IMPACT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for this amendment are available in the CIP account No. 210-190-197. The additional cost associated with this amendment is $47,540.00 and a 10% contingency, which brings the total cost of this contract to $256,472.50 with a 10% contingency amount of $25,647. ATTACHMENTS: Second Amendment to Agreement SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MEYER AND ASSOCIATES TCC EXPANSION PROJECT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of February 26, 2008, by and between the City of Temecula {"City"}, a municipal corporation, and Meyer and Associates {"Consultant"}. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each party agrees to be true and correct: a. On November 22, 2005 the City and Meyer and Associates {"Consultant") entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement far TCC Expansion Project" ("Agreement"}, in the amount of $138,880. b. ~n July 10, 2007 the parties entered into the "First Amendment to Agreement" in the amount of $70,052.50. c. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of $47,540 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Second Amendment. 2. Section 3.a. Payment of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: a. "The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B for services described in Section B of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. The payment for the work required by the First Amendment to the Agreement shall not exceed seventy thousand fifty two dollars and 501100 {$70,052.50} plus a 10% contingency in the amount of seven thousand five dollars and No/100 ($7,005.00}. The payment far the work required by the Second Amendment to the Agreement shall not exceed forty seven thousand five hundred forty dollars ($47,540} plus a 10°~ contingency in the amount of four thousand seven hundred fifty four dollars ($4,754}. The total amount of payment pursuant to the Agreement, as amended, shall not exceed the sum of two hundred fifty six thousand four hundred seventy two dollars and 501100 {$256,472.50) plus the contingencies authorized by the original agreement and the First and Second Amendments." 1 C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.GomlDocument Converterltemp1871500.doc 3. Exhibits B and C to the Agreement are hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Second Amendment, which Attachment "A" is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect. IN VItITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT: Meyer and Associates 23265 South Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Attention: Randy Meyer 949-380-1151 949-380-8117 fax BY: Randy Meyer, Principal 2 C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.GomlDocument Converterltemp1871500.doc EXHIBIT A Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Consultant. C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.GomlDocument Converterltemp1871500.doc Attachment A project description SUMMARY The project also includes limited site preparation for the historic house and barn relocation. The site is adjacent to and south of the S.A.F.E. Building site as shown on the approved site plan. Site design services shall include site utilities plan (water, sewer, and gas), electrical service, path-of-travel walkways, landscape, and irrigation. Building design services shall include foundation design, house toilet room remodel, limited barn interior improvements, and modification of entry door width to 36" if necessary. BUDGET At the present time, the actual budget for construction is not known by Meyer and Associates. BUILDING LOCATIONS The site configuration and building locations shall remain as shown on previously prepared site documents. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 1. .Upgrade house toilet room to meet ADA/Title 24 requirements for disabled access. 2. Upgrade house and barn front doors to meet ADA/Title 24 requirements for disabled access. 3. Provide accessible path-of-travel from parking lot to barn and house structures. 4. Provide house fireplace/chimney. design to replace existing fireplace/chimney. 5. Provide basic interior barn finishes as required for food storage facilities. Barn shall be a single storage room. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 1. Provide foundation design for existing single story house with raised floor. Foundation design includes connection of existing house floor framing to -new foundation. 2. Provide foundation design for existing single story barn with raised floor and retaining foundation walls. Foundation design includes connection of existing barn floor framing to new foundation. 3. Provide engineering as necessary at interior house limited toilet room modifications. CIVIL ENGINEERING 1. Provide site utilities plan for water, gas, and sewer from property line to barn and house footprints. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1. Provide power from Phase I electrical service to new panel at house. Corrections of interior house electrical systems are not included. 2. Provide power from new panel at house to new sub-panel at barn. 3. Provide new panel at house and new sub-panel at barn. 4. Provide new basic power and new basic lighting systems at barn. 5. .Provide new basic site security lighting. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 1. Provide new heating/cooling system at house only. 2. Provide new floor sink only at barn. No other barn plumbing is included. 3. Provide limited plumbing design for house toilet room modifications. 4. No barn HVAC is included. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN 1. Provide landscape design for planting similar to S.A.F.E. building planting. IRRIGATION DESIGN 1. Extend S.A.F.E. irrigation system and provide irrigation design for house/barn site area. DETAILED MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCOPE OF WORK A. Construction Document Phase Attend one (1) design and coordination meeting with the Owner's Representatives, the Architect and the other Consultants. Visit the site. Observe and record the as-built conditions that will affect the work of this project. 2. Prepare the heating and ventilating systems analysis, calculations, and designs. Select the equipment. Submit catalog cuts to the Architect for review and approval. Provide preliminary drawings showing the location of the equipment, sizes, weights, and electrical requirements. Provide the Title 24, energy conservation standards, documentation for the building envelope and mechanical systems. 4. Prepare the plumbing systems analysis, calculations, and designs. Select the fixtures, trim, and equipment. Submit catalog cuts to the Architect for review and approval. Provide preliminary drawings showing the location of the fixtures, equipment, weights, and electrical requirements. 5. Prepare the computer-drafted final drawings utilizing AutoCAD Release 2007. The Architect will furnish the electronic files for architectural drawings to the Engineer. Plots of the mechanical drawings will be submitted to the Architect for printing. A plot of the final drawings on vellum signed by the California licensed Mechanical Engineer responsible for their preparation will be submitted to the Architect. Provide the technical specifications for the HVAC and plumbing work. The specifications will conform to the Architect's format. The electronic files and one (1) hard copy will be provided. 7. Coordinate the design of the mechanical work with that of the Architect and other Consultants. 8. Assist with obtaining the approval of the reviewing agencies. 9. Provide input for addendums to be issued by the Architect. DETAILED ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SCOPE OF WORK A. Scope of Work Visit site where the two subject buildings are currently located and observe existing electrical conditions of buildings, existing electrical panels, interior electrical and provide a general report of electrical conditions. This includes telephone. 2. Provide electrical plans indicating: a. Power hook-up to each building with new meter pedestal. b. New power service to be from SCE new electrical service transformer located at new S.A.F.E. Building. c. Telephone service to be similar to above items 2a and 2b except for telephone. d. Hook-up new house HVAC system to new electrical panel. e. New house panel and new barn sub-panel. f. Existing house lighting and power to remain as is. New basic power and lighting for barn. g. New basic site security lighting. h. Title 24 for lighting. i. Compliance with Building Dept. plan check. j. Electrical specifications. B. Work Not Included (available for added fees) Printing costs other than those used in coordination directly with client. 2. Permits and plan check fees, including plan check submittal, forms and printing. 3. Job site visits other than item Ai above. 4. Lighting and power changes or upgrades to existing house lighting and power systems. 5. Telephone changes. 6. Work not outlined in Paragraphs A and B above. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DESIGN SCOPE OF WORK 1. Provide site reconnaissance to review and note the existing conditions and systems. 2. Discuss the design criteria and equipment with the City Maintenance Staff. 3. Develop an irrigation layout within the limits of the proposed project and making provisions for blending systems with the existing S.A.F.E. irrigation system. 4. Prepare irrigation water use calculations for each hydrozone using the City of Temecula standards and format. 5. Review and adjust the City of Temecula standard irrigation specifications in MS Word format for inclusion into the master specifications prepared by Meyer and Associates. Meyer and Associates will adjust the specification format to meet City requirements. scope of services The following Scope of Services reflects our interpretation of required work tasks necessary to achieve the desired design and construction documents for limited improvements to the Temecula Community Center Site for relocation of 2 historic buildings (house and barn). It is the intent to produce construction documents that meet the objectives of the City of Temecula in terms of work scope, budget limitations, accessibility, design quality, innovation, and established schedules. To assure achievement of this goal, adjustments to this program can be made. The proposed scope of work will include, but may not be limited to, the following: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Meet with the City Staff as required to coordinate project design. We anticipate a maximum of two (2) meetings required for normal processing of the design work. 2. Provide the following sub-consultant services: Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, and irrigation design. B. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE City shall furnish all available documents(s) showing existing building improvements for the historic house and barn structures. 2. Review City's project scope and intent with City Staff. 3. Visit and become familiar with the project site. Review existing building plans furnished by the City. Review physical limitations and opportunities of the existing project site, including configuration, external influences, access, and relationships with existing improvements. 4: Provide one (1) initial conceptual floor plan for House Toilet Room modifications. Provide one (1) initial conceptual site plan indicating site path-of-travel. Submit to Staff for review and comment. 5. Refine Toilet Room plan concept and site plan concept in accordance with City comments. Submit to Staff for final approval. 6. Staff to present to Directors, Commissions, or City Council as required. C. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1. Prepare design development plans (50%±) to illustrate actual scope of improvements. Plans shall be prepared as one (1) construction document package. Plan organization for alternative packages or additional phasing of improvements is not included at this time. Submit maximum 7 review sets to Staff as required. 2. Prepare preliminary opinion of probable construction cost. 3. Revise plans as necessary in accordance with City comments within the Project Scope. 4. Prepare 100% final plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, required calculations, and bidding documents in sufficient detail to obtain competitive bids. Plans shall incorporate City standards and meet Federal, State and Local requirements, as necessary. 5. Submit maximum 7 sets of final documents for final review as required (Plan Check). City shall process documents through required departments or agencies. 6. Correct plans, as required, and resubmit maximum 7 sets of final documents for the City's final approval. 7. Assist City during the project bidding. 8. Attend pre-bid meeting to be organized by the City. D. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 1. No construction support services are proposed at this time. E. POST CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 1. Not post construction support services are proposed at this time. F. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY 1. Provide available documents accurately describing the existing buildings. Provide plans illustrating existing street improvements. Coordinate and pay for required testing for hazardous materials, including asbestos investigation and report. Provide hazardous materials abatement specifications if necessary. 2. Coordinate and monitor document reviews, checking, and approvals. Pay all agency fees. 3. Pay for reproduction of final bid documents (plans and specs). 4. Provide construction administration and inspection services. 5. Provide any required environmental surveys and reports. 6. Provide City's standard title block or title sheet format if necessary. 7. Furnish City's standard front end bid documents ("Boiler Plate") in final form for the project specifications. 8. Provide plan check submissions to City, County, State or Federal Agencies if necessary. 9. Provide access to all areas of the site necessary for consultant reviews. 10. Coordinate all meetings. 11. Provide specific architectural program and technical assistance regarding operation of the facility. 12. Provide any additional information required by the Consultant for proper performance of the work. 13. Provide documents or files to Contractor for as-built drawings. 14. Provide all hazardous materials investigations and reports. 15. Attach this proposal (minimum Project Description, Scope of Services, and Fee Proposal) to any design services contract. G. EXCLUSIONS BY MEYER AND ASSOCIATES (Excluded services can be provided for additional fees). 1. All Consultant or Sub-Consultant services that are not listed as services to be included in our Scope of Services. 2. All Sub-Consultants and disciplines that are not listed as participants on our project team. 3. Excluded services include the following: a. Construction documents for improvements other than those listed in the Project Description. b. Artists renderings or illustrations. Models. c. Environmental impact reports or similar documents. d. Plan check, permit or similar fees to governmental agencies. e. Preparation or modification of drawings or documents due to City changes to previously approved documents or City changes to previous City direction. f. Printing or reproduction of documents for project bidding or construction. g. Studies or analyses not specifically listed as included. Any off-site studies or analyses. Investigations of existing building systems, barriers to the disabled, seismic conditions, etc. h. On-site field utility investigations in addition to pre-planning document research information provided by Underground Service Alert. Utility pot-holing. i. Additional soils investigations for agricultural suitability or foundation design. j. Off-site services including off-site utility connections, studies, or research. k. Street improvement documents for signalized intersections or for street improvements. I. Consulting of any kind with respect to hazardous materials such as asbestos, mold, or lead paint. m. On-going grounds or building maintenance analyses or reports. n. Destructive testing, x-ray services, or other invasive building investigations. o. Materials demolition or removal for evaluations. p. Providing specialized testing equipment or specialty testing by specialty consultants. q. Fire sprinkler, fire alarm, or smoke control engineering or construction documents, design coordination with City vendors, plan set-up for design/build construction. r. Stage design or stage construction documents. s. Means of egress plan (typically not required by Fire Department for this project scope). t. Meetings or site visits in excess of those specifically outlined in this proposal. u. Timed egress analysis or fire modeling (not required by Fire Department for this project). v. Alternative or phased plans. w. Security system or alarm system design, design coordination with City vendors, plan set-up for design/build construction. x. Acoustical study or design by an acoustical consultant. y. Traffic or parking studies or reports. z. Furniture or equipment design, layout, specifications, or purchasing. Interior design. aa. Wiring design for data and telephone. (If desired wiring design can be provided by City on marked up plan and transferred to construction drawings by Consultant). bb. Video systems. cc. Site retaining wall design. Building retaining walls or complex site retaining walls with special loading requirements (such as automobile surcharges, etc.), other than foundation walls. dd. Sub-surface site drainage systems. ee. Pile and grade beam foundation system. ff. Prestressed concrete design. gg. Boundary survey. hh. WQMP, SWPPP, or similar storm water management plans. BMP's. ii. Kitchen design. jj. Value engineering. kk. Certifications of as-built or record documents for completeness or accuracy. The Architect will not have sufficient knowledge of the day-to-day operations of the Contractor to make such a certification. II. Health Department submittals. mm. Construction support services or post construction support services. nn. Lighting or power design for the house structure. oo. Electrical Title 24 calculations except for barn and site lighting. pp. Grading and drainage plans. Civil Engineering services other than site utilities plan. qq. Improvements to existing structures except barn interior finishes, barn entry door, house toilet room, or house entry door. rr. Seismic analysis, seismic retrofit, structural design of any kind to the existing structures. Design of any structure moving or relocation systems, or similar. .professional fee Meyer and Associates proposes to complete the proposed Scope of Work for the following not-to-exceed lump sum fee: Conceptual Design: Maximum 2 Staff Meetings. $ 750.00 Measure Existing Building Floor Structure (Barn). $ 200.00 Measure Existing Floor Plan (Barn). $ 100.00 Measure Existing Building Floor Structure (House). $ 300.00 Measure Existing Floor Plan (House). $ 350.00 Prepare Documents of Existing Structures: Floor Plan (Barn). $ 120.00 Floor Plan (House). $ 600.00 Floor Framing (Barn). $ 350.00 Floor Framing (House). $ 450.00 Conceptual Design. Site Plan (Circulation and Ramps). $ 1,200.00 Barn Floor Plan. $ 250.00 House Floor Plan. $ 750.00 Construction Documents: Civil Engineering (Site Utility Plan). $ 2,750.00 Preliminary Improvement Drawings (50%).' $ 15,710.00 Preliminary Cost opinion. $ 1,800.00 Final Improvement Drawings (100%).' $ 15,710.00 Final Cost Opinion. $ 2,500.00 Specifications. $ 900.00 Reimbursable Expenses (Allowance): Printing/Reproduction/Plotting. $ 2,000.00 Miscellaneous (Electrical Engineer). $ 250.00 Miscellaneous (Mechanical Engineer). $ 250.00 Miscellaneous (Civil Engineer). $ 250.00 TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED FEE $ 47,540.00 Bid support services as requested shall be billed separately at the enclosed Standard Hourly Rates. Construction support services can be handled in the same manner. *Break Down of Fees (Construction Documents): Architectural Design (Site): $ 2,500.00 Architectural Design (Buildings): $ 3,250.00 Structural Engineering (Design/Calculations): $ 2,420.00 Structural Drawings (Foundation Plans): $ 2,000.00 Structural Drawings (Misc. Framing): $ 750.00 Mechanical Engineering (Plumbing, HVAC): $ 8,250.00 Electrical Engineering: $ 8,250.00 l_andscapeArchitecturalDesign: $ 1,250.00 Irrigation Design: $ 2,750.00 (Subtotal $ 31,420.00) The above fees include costs for transportation, teleph one, interim submittals, review specifications, and normal insurance coverage. Meyer and Associates understands the City will furnish information and services listed after our Scope of Services. These fees have been based on the Project Description and Scope of Work. Meyer and Associates will provide construction documents for improvements within the limits of the Project Description and Scope of Work. Documents for improvements exceeding the Project Description or Scope of Work are not included. Should the Project Description or Scope of Work be increased, the fee may be adjusted accordingly. Services will be billed on an hourly basis for actual work performed up to the total not-to-exceed fee. The breakdown of fees above is a guideline only to illustrate estimated fee components of the overall services. Without exceeding the not-to-exceed fee, actual work performed will be responsive to specific job requirements and may vary from the itemized listing above. standard hourly rates 1. MEYER AND ASSOCIATES will provide services, as may be requi red and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 135.00 Project Coordinator $ 125.00 Project Architect $ 100.00 Project Landscape Architect $ 100.00 Recreation Designer $ 85.00 Architectural Designer $ 85.00 Landscape Architectural Designer $ 85.00 CAD Operator $ 60.00 Word Processor $ 45.00 Clerical $ 40.00 Design Meeting $ 500.00 Construction Site Visit/Meeting and Report $ 800.00 2. R.F. DANIELS AND ASSOCIATES will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 125.00 Project Engineer $ 100.00 Staff Engineer $ 80.00 Clerical $ 40.00 3. REEDCORP will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 140.00 Project Manager $ 90.00 Designer $ 80.00 CAD Operator/Drafting $ 70.00 Clerical $ 35.00 4. F.T: ANDREWS will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 140.00 Engineering Manager $ 125.00 Engineer $ 105.00 Senior Designer $ 95.00 Designer $ 80.00 CADD Technicians $ 70.00 Clerical $ 55.00 5. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION CONSULTING will provide irriga tion design services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 110.00 Project Manager $ .85.00 Senior Draftsperson $ 60.00 Draftsperson $ 50.00 Clerical $ 40.00 6. O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 175.00 Senior Estimator $ 125.00 Senior Scheduler $ 125.00 Project Manager $ 125.00 Estimator $ 110.00 Scheduler $ 110.00 Computer Consultant $ 110.00 COZAD AND FOX will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal Civil Engineer $ 195.00 Principal Land Surveyor $ 195.00 Senior Project Engineer $ 160.00 Project Engineer $ 140.00 Assistant Project Engineer $ 120.00 Administrative $ 95.00 Project Coordination $ 95.00 Typing/Printing $ 45.00 Survey -Office Analysis $ 160.00 2 Man Survey Crew (4 Hour Minimum) $ 250.00 fee notes 1. Consultation in connection with Contractor disputes, arbitration, litigation, court appearances and additional consultants will be quoted separately and is not a part of this proposal. 2. Additional billing classifications may be added to the above listing during the year as new positions are created. 3. It should be noted that the foregoing wage rates are effective through September 1, 2008. The rates may be negotiated with the City after that date to compensate for labor adjustments and other increases in costs. 4. Services of outside consultants not listed in this proposal shall be billed at our direct cost, plus 15% of the actual cost of their services for coordination. 5. Reimbursable items, such as the cost of blueprinting, graphic reproduction, FAX, and plotting shall be billed at our direct cost plus 15%. 6. It is the responsibility of Meyer and Associates to schedule the project's completion under normal conditions without the use of its staff on an overtime basis. If the City adjusts the deadline or requests that work be completed earlier than originally scheduled and thus requires overtime, the fees shall be adjusted to cover the increased costs incurred by Meyer and Associates. The hourly rates for overtime will be one and one-half (1'/z) times the standard hourly rates except for Sundays and holidays, which will be two (2) times the standard hourly rates. 7. We will bill on a monthly basis in proportion to the time spent on the project. All billing statements are due upon receipt. Interest will be charged at the rate of 1 Yz% per month on the past due balance thirty days and over. Meyer and Associates shall have the right to stop work should accounts become past due. 8. Fees contained herein are valid for 6 months from the date of this Proposal. ITEM NCB. 6 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Utility Easement Deed and Grant Deeds for Open Space Lots PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed for Open Space Lot 75 of Tract 24188 known as Meadows Park and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the grant deed to be recorded; 2. Authorize acceptance of the Utility Easement Deed for Open Space Lot 79 of Tract 24188 and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the easement deed to be recorded. 3. Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed of Open Space Lots 11 and 12 of Tract 31344 and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the deed to be recorded. BACKGROUND: For Recommendations 1 and 2: The Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan No. 219 is a residential and commercial development consisting of 5,072 dwelling units and 47.5 acres for commercial use. Paloma Del Sol is located mid-City and is encircled by Pauba Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Temecula Parkway and Margarita Road. Other components of Paloma Del Sol included two public elementary schools, one public middle school, two public parks, two private recreational facilities, and 41 acres of greenbelt paseos and open space. Paloma Del Sol Park is a 9.5 acre public sports park that was developed and dedicated to the City in 1994. Meadows Park was originally planned be only 4 acres however in Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 the developer increased this public park size to 5 acres and reduced the adjacent residential planning area. Meadows Park was built and dedicated to the City in 2003 under the assumption of the dedications being provided in the Specific Plan, conditions of approval and original maps. Due to technicalities, the developer experienced delays in filing the recordation of the final map. In order to provide clear title the developer is providing a grant deed far the City's acceptance at this time. A policy of title insurance will be provided bythe developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City. The Utility Easement Deed in Open Space Lot 79 of Tract 24188 is being provided as the utilities for the park are located through this lat. This will provide the Citywith access to these utilities for future replacement or repair. For Recommendation 3: Tract 31344 is a residential tract of ten (10) residential lots and two (2) open space lots developed by Gallery Homes. This development is located on the northeast corner of Ynez and Rancho Vista Roads. Open Space Lot 11 is approximately .1 acre (4,303 square feet) and located adjacent to Ynez Road. Open Space Lot 12 is approximately .02 acres (934 square feet) and is located adjacent to Rancho Vista Road. The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) will maintain the perimeter landscaping along Ynez and Rancho Vista Roads and including the open space lots as per the conditions of approval and as approved by a Service Level C property owner election. The improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. A policy of title insurance will be provided by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City. FISCAL IMPACT: The funding required to maintain Meadows Park is has been included in Temecula's 2007-2008 operating budget and the revenue has been provided from the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. The revenue needed to maintain the perimeter landscaping including lots 11 and 12 in Tract 31344 shall be provided by an annual Service Level C rate and charge of $328.55 per residential parcel for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. This rate is subject to a Consumer Price Index increase each year. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Vicinity Map -Meadows Park 2) Grant Deed -Meadows Park 3) Utility Easement Deed -Meadows Park 4) Vicinity Map -Tract 31344 5) Grant Deed -Tract 31344 ATTACHMENT 1 City of Temecula Geographic Information Systems 43200 tiusincss Park Urivc'I'cmccula, C;A 92590 (951)308-6300 ww+v.citgnfrontncula.org Vicinity Map ' ' i' i I I II I II. II I ~ ~.. hII jj . I i II. II _~ .I II 11 I I 'I it I ;. I III t ~.~ ~` ~ I II I,.-I~nRIE:P1~~00 ti ~ ~j I It ~ 5 ...~~~} t 'JI II II II' II' II it li 'I1 II II II I. .Il,_ :,ti ri ~, , / I ~ j i I'f ~O G'~ I I PAUl3J4 RD 1 '~ ..1- ~ k .m1 jL l r r '7S GU~~~' ' t i y II , I ' 'll ` ~44• I ~ 'f i I 7 I ~[~ ~~ ~. ~. ~ I I ~ I~ ~ _ I~ I h '~~ r j fn 'I I i .V 'I ~ 1 T I ~ p ~' ' ' ~ Nl. [7R I ~~ L~ 1'" r' 'C y ~ e -' (7A ~ ~ ii ~~ tT it ~I~ I li 7 I U ~ jl Y ~ tP ~ ~ it III i~, .I! 'I .~ ~ Z + ~ ~ j j d 9 C7N . N i t i ~ O ~ ~ r- ~ y t D ter v ~ ` i , I p .' ' 'j .{ ~ ~~~ v I ~ ~ .I I 9 II ~ Ix ~~ ~*t . ~.~ '',I f) +~-, ~ ~i ~ -'~,_,.j i- ~11 fl I 7C -III j~' ~ _I h , ` G ~4~ t -,L~~; y 1 ~, s.. t. ~. RU'HENBERG DR ~ P . Case~ep .. II ~ ~ 'I it ~~ I ~ j I I_, I '~ ~ ~ ~'° hgEADOWS PARK %, ,{~-~ ~•~`,, I I j y Lot 75 ~~1`~'rti , ~} I~ I i I ` 'v ~'~ II r.r. II ~1 ~~ II..I. II y I~ ~ '~ 7 ~, 4), .I ~ AF ~ '„ yl l I II .~ a ~ z ~ j ,• t7c7~~as 172 ,,;,'CABS Ck SUNNY tv1'A i I I I~ ~ 1 ~!' `` ~ ~ ',r ~~~ ~~I III ~(G~ `, I i ~ i ~ ~ ~~ I i ~ 5 1 I~ ATTACHMENT 2 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temecula PER GOVT CODE § 27383 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula CA 92589-9033 EXEMPT RECORDING SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CAL-PASEO DEL SOL.LLC a California limited liability company hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto, Executed on November 12, 2007, at San Diego, California. Signature Type/Print Name Michael L. Rust Position Vice President CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Sate Diego ss. On November 12, 2007, before me, Karen_L_ou_ise Haman, Notary Public f):,fr. rroma dn[ quo M OflkJr (o lj,'J.xt: bCr., IJntAiy I'tIClln~ ~ personally appeared ____-''`~`*Michael L. Rust '~~`* _ ~l personally known to me _1 of satisfacto -e eVf ncTce to be the person(~j! whose name(' isles subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshgLttl4y executed _ the same )n hisfi~erlt#eir authorized KARENlOU~SE~y~ capacity r ), and that by hislge~heir, Commb>aan ~ 1449197 signaturoj on the instrument the person(s), or }~ • -IbilpryPubNc-Cai]fornlq ~ the entity upon behalf of which the person' 8a-Di~yoCounty acted, executed the instrument. luiy comm. iE>mN~s Nov 12,2007 4 I NESS my nd and officl I seal. r Plflce Notnty Sonl lbov[+ 5rynature N tJn1A~ y Puhti; _ ~~~ ~~ OPTIONAL Though the infonnatian brifow is no; regeriiad by dew, d may prove valuai~le to persons relying on Ure document end could prevent fraudulent romoval lard ruafltrrhrrlunt o! this farm to anaNlai docunrartt. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document:. _Utilily Eascrucut Dcc<I Document Dato: ____•_ 11 / l 2/07 !~__ NumbQr of Pages: One (1) Signer(s) Qlher Than Nam©d Above: Capacity(ies} Claimed by Signer Signer's Name' I Individual I~; Corporate Officer - - Tlile(s): V1Ce PCe51C~Etlt _ I~ Partner --Cl Limited I :General C Attorney In Fact C l'rustee .. Gurlnlian or Conservator r Other: Siyrter -s Repa;sr:niing: __ _ C1t-P ~co dcl Sol,. LLC.- _ _ A 19T7 ~atxtw Naaty tissoAthen • eJY1 UD SO.J .11Y1 ~ P.O. OO, 2M2 • ChJ :xrM, GA ~Jt919~2{02 •Hxwm;cnttav}arp Plm.ro..:OJ; header. Gu+l u~r:w 1.1fp0•b704927 EXHIBIT A Lot 75 of Tract Map No. 24188, as shown by Map on file in Boolc 396, pabes 41-48, Records of Riverside Cowrty, California. Riverside County Recorders Information: No: 2005-1066525 Date: December 28, 2005 Attachment 3 Recording requested by and when Recorded, mai3 to: City Clerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Exempt from Recording Fee per Govt. Code Sec. 27383 City of Temecula line forRecorder's use} DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS NONE. Public Agency exempt. Revenue and Taxation Code Secfion 1?922 UTILITY EASEMENT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CAL-PASEO DEL SOL, LLC a California limited liability company ("Grantors") hereby grants and conveys to the Temecula Community Services District ("Grantee") a public corporation, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing irrigation equipment over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter described as follows in Exhibit "A "which is attached. If GRANTEE, or its, successors, or assigns, determine it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of the GRANTOR, wifh a!I covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of al! heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees of the GRANTOR. Ali as illustrated on the plat attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B" IN WETNESS WHERE OF; this instrument has been executed this 12th day of November, 2007. Signature: ~..~, ~ ~~ Print/Type Name: Michael L. Rust Position: Vice President CaDocnments znd Servings\mnrsl\[.ocal ServingslTemporary Lrternet Filcs\OLKF1Utility Basement Deed (2).doc CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California Count of San Diego y - - -- --- On November 12, 2007, before me, Karen_ Louise Haymant Notary Public Uatc Nnmo an( x1110 01 U77KM (O +J.,'J:.n.: Oro, 7Jnrar/ YUGIC~ • >G X >7t personally appeared ______ ~_:_ Michael L. Rust **_* _ _ .~ personally known to me _ 1 peeved- sis--9#,Satis~Ctn~G enf~ nce to be the person{~ whose name(' is/arc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he6s#~e~thcy executed KARENIOUIJiis-lq~ the same m his/t~erlthrcir authorized Canmiaebn# 1449197 r( `~. Nota P cal)acity~s), and that by his#terdtfiretr signature) on the instrument the porsor~ or ry ub11c ~ CWffomlp >Y ~ ~ ~8o Cotes the entity upon behalf of which the persan~ NN Catnm. ExPMhs Nov 12, 2007 acted, executed the instrument. WITN S my hand d official se I. / Wt-~-~ ~(~~'-~(~cl-~- - ~'G(~~- 3CC Nolm/ Sool Abow+ Sk~nntvre d NOlnry Auhl'r. OPTIONAL Though tha infoa)talien J>F7fow is noJ requirar/ by law, it may prove v~luablri In pe)sens relying on fhe doarrr)enJ anJ cool[[ pnivonl fraudulunt itirnovt)! F)!7(! /f1E1lJ8Cl1(R(i/I! Or il7/$ k)rl71 Co i1ROJlle!'CIUCflfl70fir, Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: -- Gr~n_t--Decd to the City of Temecula Document Date: -._.._____-- 11/ 12/07 Qne ~ 1 ~ --- ---------.. _.-- ----- - _ -- - -....... - ----- - Numbor of Pagos: Signer(s) Other Than Narned Abovo: Capacity~ies) Clamed by Signer Signor's Name, I ' Individual 1 )p of flnpn6 h,t1<; C. Corporate Officer - -Title(s): ~1Ce PreSldent I-- Partner --. L~ Lirnifed I ;General C Attorney in Fact C Trustee L_ Guardian or Conservator f-' Other: Siyner )s Rrprfarnting: _ Cttl-P.1s~0 dcl 501, LLC [71939 ~pc1W7Vaary~,tstall7[n•9JS)Ue So'o.Nn,P.O.(7ox 2t02•Cn7.~nrrth, CA 9137;ypC02•xHw ny.afitrlary crq Pro7. tta.:.AY' Hcutlc-Cavi %fbP:u~l~l1(q~6766527 TXI~IBTT A L,ot 79 of 7-ract Map No. 24 t88, as shown by Map on file in Book 396, pages 41-48, Records of Riverside County, California. Riverside County Recorders [nformation: No: 2005-1066525 Date: December 28, 2005 SiPASGO DGI. SOL\<ac Park Si¢ 3)fdl<zIi011~i)Idtl}' 4:ascinem Decd ovp'loi ]9 for 5. a Dark site(i).doc \5 IDAYY itAP, ,._^^ In UlF. C/,'Y~0/' %!:x(r,^.lAt, CCUMn' 0% ItN7.S/AF. L/'S~i,:72 Pr Ct/u("t'C~Rn"rt'~~_` VICiNI":Y Ald? I I~,/ / J(~Yj F,Mt; R Si/O~:R$'0.4' Or A oaclrJ.': a" /'.u2L:^.c ?). 76. 71..~~U JU. :0::! 'R viii! .t Jia7lG.l~ Cl :2!/:FG:: tDi '/ 0.!' ?'.SCI: tun ?JU:.tS S/f,"°iI U>' ~tGiP CN !'N; v! aJ,',J~ 159, F/ V.:GLS .k" i,fMliG/I 61, vJ i.(,P~~l ///.°S. !.5' ;:.: G~'!/.':' G/ i>L' .CL'A~ RL.^C!1C:R "~ HA%YP,Su);' Coulll`' (/v /l(iClRl. l1.~ '7'!': v' if]!/!5' hi:CUS% 2GU5 ~ rr °~•tn•t:+G P.;ra: Ytf£ Kf7Yd CO%IPIJ/1f.S, 7/LC. 5 t 2? t `5 ~i i (. 5 1 1~'S ..t ,, n .oi jj ! 1 i u j ~~ ~ 1 `~ S1 i °.:1i1 . i i .~ ~ tS r _ 1 W 2 'gip?~'" 5: _ ~5~7 ,` j;~LC 1~5 Il , ~~~..-~ 1... ^~' n Z 1 ~~ t $ - 1 ,J J3 ~ ,~ ~ ,$ ~ _, ~~?_ r ,1 $ t ,sue'.-•~"" Yt A ~' ~~ U it (l; ~1. "~ - ~ z ~ "~ ;~. "; ~1^ as ,l' ~b 1 '~8 /~L~CY,E DRIVE . .t!'r ~~is.lj li, ~,o;,o^-~F 'i: ' ~ t ,.. '.., _ .. h, 4 a .,{C?;:. g( ` 65 J 4 1 ~t ~s 72 yor s 7 ~~ .. ~ <y ~,1_,~.. ly. ~,~ ~t .. M15 .LaS" '•. ~1, ~ .. .'1 -- 'G' !S f,J ~ 4Gv C! `4t~/ `Ii •,Af~~~ y` f \V / `i \\ ~ ~,, I~~ ~~~~ f(~r{AJ Y.ttitl, a ji ( 1,r -. ~~ `~s .~o~ `~) F)/J2/?£ PARR SITE' \`^~`'~ x.999 .iC. ,VET ~._ sic sHCEr No. ~ ATTACHMENT 4 Vicinity Map Tract 31344 Lots 11 and 12 ,; ~o to 4Q' ~ ,, '~q ' , ~o \~ ,~ p~Rro<q`', _~ ~ / ~ O~ \~ ~\ ~~~G9 Lot 12 Lot 11 y~, ~~ ~~ .pa CO~ ~ ~,QT~o4: / ~Cg3p y0~, TER CT ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ , 1- ~ iz ~~~ T ~ I ~ i i ~ ~ 1 TIERRA VISTA RD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~~~ ~ - , ~~ ~ ~ __/r ~ iz i ,, ,~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~,, ~ U,~ ~ i ~ e~~k\/ o EyF Ro , ~~~~, ; /~~ 7, m \~~ ~. 1 /~ o so izo zao aso nao /i'~ Fee1 ATTACHMfiNT 5 RECORDING REQUESTED RYt STEWART T[T6E OP CALIFORNIA AND tVHEN RECORDED:iNAl1; TO: QFFICE OF 7HE CITY CLERK CITY OF 7EMECULA - ?. 0.803( 8033 TEMECUiJI, CA 82689.9033 OtigER NO: 517426327 APN:944i092.037.8,844-p82-038~8 TNA :013.00'4 ~ . DTI: SO.W GRa~NT oho TITLE OF DOCt7MENT TtIlS FAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUiITE SPACE.F'OR RECORDING INFORII7ATION ~(53.UU ADDITIONAL RECORDING FEE APPLIES) i 1 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY pity of Temecula PER GOVT CODE § 2738$ ANd WHEN RECORDED MAILTO: Office of the City Glerk City of Temecula P.O. Box 8033 Temecula; CA~. 92589.9033 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9D33 Temecula CA 92589-9033 EXEMPT RECORDING SPAGE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GALLERY PORTRAITS PARTNERS, LLC., a California limited liability company hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, the following clescritied real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California: Sae Exhibit "A" attaohed hereto, 'Executed on _ July 3/ , 2007, at %~.,_~_~~~ ~ California. GALLERY PORTRAITS PARTNERS, LLC. MenwJi~ ~-.sti .6 ~-.~ Signature //\ _`. ~ )~ n t /~,-_ Type/Print Name ~ ~ - 6 „o/ ,~ ~/ ~. osition ir~~,.,--, ,~~ ~ Signature Type/Print Name Position CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Cal'rfomia ss. County of ,E, • v cis ~'~/~.. On ~~3 i a 7 before me, ~. /C~/SS h ci- /f/o sLG ~/~ ~{/ c Name antliweMONKer (e 8~~'.kne fMe. Noarry VW6c~ - personally appeared iE 'chi o/ !J f~,ac~se~ Name(s) a SOrier(s) ersonally known to me ^ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence CAnxalpion I i T x.170 Malay Rblfc - CaYfatlMO _ RlwrNrM County 2My W Mn.6pM~.lOnd~ 2011 to be the person(~f whose name(aj is/ar9 subscribed to the wiEhin instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sh6/they executed the same in his/h¢t/theta authorized rapacity(ie~, and that by his/herfthetr signature(6} on the instrument the person(a~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s~ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~Sgnawro al Notary Public =~ OPT10/VAL though the inlormatipn below is not required by law, rt may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and mould prevent treuduien! removal and reettechmenf of tnls tarn t0 anoMer document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies} Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ^ Individual mPmmwabhara ^ CorporafeOfficer-Title(s): ^ Partner-^Limited ^General ^ Attorney-in-Fact ^ TRISteB ^ Guardian or Conservator ^ Other: Signer Is Representing: n ~aaa iwuxui nurmvr+*~wMwaa•~waawwva.,rv. max 24p2•patswollll. G4916134?402•wxxNeUOrmlNaary.orB Prof. Na. 590J tteotcar: Call TOY~Fr¢e 1~BOp~B]6eB27 Notary's Form EXIiT13T3' A Lots I 1 and 12 of Tract Map No. 31344, in the. City of Temecula, as per Map recorded in Book 39&, Pages 41 through 43, inclusive of Maps, in the Off ce of The County Recorder of said County. Lot 1I -APN 944-092-037 Lot J2 -APN 944-092-038 ITEM NCB. 7 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to the Animal Shelter JPA Agreement PREPARED BY: Tamra Middlecamp, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the JPA Agreement relating to the Southwest County Animal Shelter. BACKGROUND: On April 24, 2005, the City Council approved Temecula's participation in a Joint Powers Authority referred to as the Southwest Communities Financing Authority (SCFA). The member agencies of the SCFA include the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake and the County of Riverside. The express purpose of the JPA is to fund and construct an animal shelter, located in Wildomar, that will serve the region. The second amendment to the Agreement adds Section 19(g) which serves to make the contract bid procedures the County must legally follow applicable as well to the SCFA. This is necessary because the Department of Facilities Management will be acting as the project manager for construction of the SCFA's animal shelter facility, which will include handling of the bidding process for the project. Additionally, the second amendment incorporates the powers of the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act. This addition allows for a more efficient legislative approval process forthe issuance of revenue bonds by SCFA for capital projects benefiting its constituent agencies. The amendment also includes minor house-keeping changes and corrections and has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this revision to the JPA Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: JPA Agreement SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RNERSIDE AND THE CITY OF CANYON LAKE; THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE; THE CITY OF 1VILTRRIETA; AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA; CREATING THE SOUTHWEST COMMUNITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY (Animal Shelter) This second amended and restated Joint Powers Agreement, is made and entered into this day of 20(78, by and betti~~een the County of Riverside (hereafter referred to as "COUNTY"), and the City of Canyon Lake ("Canyon Lake"); City of Lake Elsinore ("Lake Elsinore"); City of I~'Iurt•ieta ("IVlurrieta"); and City of Temecula ("Temecula"), collectively the "Cities" each body being a body corporate and politic of the State of California, or public entities or agencies of the State of California; RECITALS: WHEREAS, COUNTY and Canyon Lake; Lake Elsinore; Murlieta; and Temecula have mutual interests in joining together to develop within the geographic area common to all parties, a plan or program to construct and operate an animal shelter located within the geographic boundaries as attached hereto in Attachment A, in compliance with State laws and regulations; and WHEREAS, it is the interest and desire of the parties to enter into a Joint Po«~ers Agreement to establish SOFA as a public entity, separate and apart from the parties hereto, as hereinafter described and set forth, which entity shall then set about the task of accomplishing the purpose of this Joint Powers Agreement in a manner most capable of promoting the greatest public good and welfare; and t~'HEREAS, the parties hereto are each empowered by law to provide for the animal shelter needs to eligible residents of each entities either directly, or by contract or similar aiY-angement; NOt~~, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained and for other valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE This Joint Po~~~ers Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"} is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7 of Title 1 (commencing with Section &500} of the California Government Code, (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"} for the express purpose of constructing, and housing animals, also known as operating an animal shelter, to serve residents of the parties hereof. Additionally, this Agreement shall permit the financing of public capital improvements and those purposes permitted under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, being Article 4, Chapter 5, Division 7 of Title 1 (commencing with Section 6584} of the California Government Code (the "Bond Law''}. It is the intent of this Agreement that none of the decisions regarding field service boundaries or levels of service for animal control for each of the member entities shall be affected by the creation of this JPA, or by membership in this JPA. The purpose of this Agreement shall be accomplished and the common powers of the parties hereto exercised in the manner hereinafter set forth. SECTION 2. CRE:~TION OF AUTHORITY Pursuant to the Act and the Bond Law, there is hereby created a public entity to be known as the Southwest Communities Financing Authority (``SCFA"). SCFA shall be a public entity, separate and apart from the parties hereto, and as provided by law and not other«~ise prohibited by this Agreement, shall be empo«~ered to take such actions as may be necessary or desirable to implement and carry out the purpose of this Agreement. /// /// IIl 2 SECTION 3. TERM This Agreement shall become etTective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated as provided in Section 4. below. SECTION 4. TERM-IINATION AND A11~TENDII-LENTS (a) The parties hereto may amend this Agreement by mutual written consent. (b) The parties hereto may terminate their participation in the Joint Powers Authority, and this Agreement as provided herein. (c) If SOFA has incurred no obligations each party may terminate this Agreement by giving not less than sixty (6th) days «~ritten notice thereof to the all other parties. (d) If SCFA has acquired any indebtedness, fiscal obligation, and/or any property, each party hereto may terminate this Agreement by giving t«~elve (12) months written notice thereof to all other parties subject to the provisions of Sections 4(e) and 4(t~ herein. (e} This Agreement cannot be terminated until all forms of indebtedness, and/or fiscal obligation incurred by SCFA have been paid, or adequate provision for such payment shall have peen made. (f} In the event the Agreement is terminated, any property acquired by SCFA from the effective date of this Agreement, including but not limited to money, shall be divided and distributed bets-een the parties in proportion to the contributions made, including contributions made as provided in Section 10 below, unless otherwise required by la«~. SECTION 5. PO~`'ERS AND DUTIES OF SCFA SCFA shall have the powers common to the parties to this Agreement to: (a) Exercise those powers enumerated in the Act and Bond Law as the same as now exists or as may hereinafter be amended: (b) Do all acts necessary or convenient to the exercise ofthe foregoing and to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, including but not necessarily limited to the following: (1) to make and execute all contracts, agreements, and documents including, «~ithout limitation, agreements j~~•ith any of the parties to this Agreement, other local govei-~iments, agencies or departments, the State of California, the United States of America, or agencies thereof, or any entity, person or corporation of any kind or nature whatever; (2) to employ agents, servants and employees; (3) to acquire, hold and dispose of property, both real and personal; (4) to acquire, construct, maintain, manage, operate and lease buildings, «~orks and improvements; (5) to accept. gifts; (6) to sue and be sued in its o«~n name; (7) to apply for and receive any available federal, State and/or local grants; (8) to employ legal counsel; (9) to employ consultants; { 10) to adopt a budget; (11) to incur debts, liabilities and obligations; (12) to establish a treasury for the deposit and disbursement of funds and monies, according to the policies and procedures set forth in this Agreement; (13) to invest any money held in the treasury that is not required for immediate necessities of SCFA, as SOFA determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies pursuant to Section X2601 of the California Government Code. 4 (14) to issue bonds and other evidences of indebtedness for the construction of an animal shelter, and the consent ofthe Governing Board of each member to participation in this Joint Po«~ers Authority shall be deemed consent for the issuance of bonds by SCFA, as required under California Government Code Sections 6500 et seq. and the Bond Law. The listing of the above acts is not intended to indicate any priority of one act over another. Nor is such listing intended to be inclusive, and other acts maybe done in the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement as are authorized. One or several acts may take place concun-ently or in sequence. SEC"TION 6. CREATION OF THE BOARD OF DIREC"TORS (a) Creation of the Board of Directors. In order to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement as set forth herein, SCFA shall be governed by a Board of Directors (hereinafter called the "Board"), and all of the powers of SCFA shall be exercised by the Board. (b) Membership. The Board shall be composed ofthe following members: (1) One (1) member of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County; (2) One (1}member of the City Council of the City of Canyon Lake; (3) One (1) member of the City Council of the City of Lake Elsinore; (4) One { 1) member of the City Council of the City of I~flun•ieta; (5) One {1}member of the City Council of the City of Temecula. (c) Designation of I~'Iembers. Members shall serve on the Board during the term for which they are a member ofthe Board of Supe1-~•=isors, or a member of the City Council from «~hich they are appointed. A member's position on the Board shall automatically terminate if the term of the elected public office of such member is teitninated. (d} Reimbursement. The Board may provide for reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurl-ed in connection with a member's service on the Board. (e) Quorum and Transaction of Business. Three (3) members of the Board shall constitute a quorum. A vote of three (3) of the members present shall be required to take action, except for adjournment of a meeting which shall require only a majority ofthose present. No proxy or absentee voting shall be permitted. (f) ~Ieetin~s. The Board shall establish the time and place for its regular and special meetings. The dates, hour and location of regular meetings shall be fixed by formal action of the Board. The Board shall hold at least one (1}regular meeting every calendar year. Special meetings and adjourned meetings maybe held as required or permitted by applicable law. (g) Ralph M. Bro«-~n Act. All meetings ofthe Board, including, without limitation, regular, special and adjourned meetings, shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph I~~I. Bro«m Act (commencing with Section X4950 of the California Government Code). (h) Rules. The Board may adopt, from time to time, such rules and regulations for the conduct of its meetings and activities as it may deem necessary. In the ahsence of specific rules for SOFA meetings, the rules of the Board of Supervisors shall be applicable for the conduct of meetings of SOFA. SECTION 7. FISCAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE P~-1RTIES It is the intent of the parties as members of SCFA that the following fiscal obligations shall be agreed upon for all parties to this Agreement: (a) Debt repayment of any bonds issued by SCFA -shall be paid by each party based on the percentage of animals housed at the facility, on an annual basis. (b) Administration costs of the SCFA - includes, but not limited to the following items: stipends, legal fees, audit, costs, administrative fee, mileage reimbursement -shall be borne equally by each party. 6 (c) Operation of animal shelter -shall be paid by each party based on the percentage of animals housed at the facility, on an annual basis. (d) Determination of the percentages for sub-sections (a) and (c) shall be made on an annual basis in January based on the usage information received for the preceding calendar year. The percentages shall be designated for calculation starting July 1St of that same calendar year. No party shall divert any animals «~ithin its custody, care or control, including those held on behalf of a party under contracted services with an animal control or humane society provider, that are located within the SCFA's geographic boundaries (as reflected in attached Attachment A) from being housed at SCFA's animal shelter facility contemplated under this Agreement unless said facility lacks the capacity to accept the animal(s) in question or where the SCFA has granted express written consent for the animals} in question to be diverted to another animal shelter facility. (e) Annexations of any area by any party shall result in that party assuming fiscal responsibility for the area amzexed. The additional annexation shall result in a re-calculation of percentages of (a) and (c). (f) Incorporation of any geographic area served by SCFA, and in the event of the new city not joining as a member in SCFA, COUNTY shall reserve the ability to contract directly with the new city for animal seiti~ices. (g) 1-~zy party jvithdra«~ing from SCFA agrees to payment of the current percentage of the following: (i) After the issuance of bonds, the party agrees to payment of the party's current percentage of the amount of the outstanding bonds. (ii) Any unpaid portion of the administrative costs of SOFA, calculated up to the effective date of termination of participation in SCFA of the party. (iii) Any unpaid portion of the operation costs of the animal shelter, calculated up to the effective date of termination of participation in SCFA of the party. 7 SECTION 8. OFFICERS AND E11~IPLOYEES (a) Chairperson and Vice Chairperson. The Board may select a chairperson and a vice chairperson from among its members at its first meeting, and annually thereafter. The term of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, when selected in this manner, shall be for one (1) year. In the event that the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson so elected resigned from such office or ceases to be a member of the Board, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next regular meeting of the Board. In the absence or inability ofthe Chairperson to act, the Vice Chairperson shall act as Chairperson. The Chairperson, or in the Chairperson's absence, the Vice Chairperson, shall preside at and conduct all meetings of the Board. (b) Treasurer. The Treasurer of the County of Riverside shall be and shall act as the Treasurer of SOFA. The Treasurer shall have the custody of SCFA's money and disburse SOFA funds pursuant to the accounting procedures ofthe County of Riverside. The Treasurer shall assume the duties described in Section 6505.E ofthe California Government Code, namely: receive and receipt for all money of SOFA (with the exception of any bond proceeds «-~hich shall be deposited with the Trustee bank} and place it in the Treasury of the Treasurer to the credit of SCFA; be responsible upon an official bond as prescribed by the Board for the safekeeping and disbursement of all Agency money so held; pay, when due, out of money of SCFA so held, all sums payable, only upon «~~arrants of the officer performing the functions of the Controller who has been designated by SCFA or the Board; verify and report in writing in conjunction ~~~ith the annual audit of SCFA and to the parties to this Agreement the amount of money held for SCFA, the amount of receipts since the last repo7-t, and the amount paid out since the last report; and perform such other duties as are set forth in this Agreement or specified by the Board. Any and all funds of the SCFA shall not be commingled «~~ith any other funds held by the Treasurer. (c) Controller. The Auditor/Controller of the County of Riverside shall be the Controller of SCFA. The Controller shall dra«-~ «--~al-rants to pay demands against SCFA when such demands have been approved by the Board or by any other person authorized to so approve such by this Agreement or by resolution of the Board. The Controller shall perform such duties as are set forth in this Agreement and such other duties as are specified by the Board. There shall be strict accountability of all funds and reporting of all receipts and disbursements. The Controller shall establish and maintain such procedL~res, funds and accounts as may be required by sound accounting practices. The books and records of SCFA in the hands of the Controller shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by representatives ofthe pa1-ties to this Agreement. (d) Program Administrator. The Executive Officer for the County of Riverside, or designee, shall be the Program Administrator for SCFA. The Program Administrator, or designee, shall direct the day-to-day operation of SCFA. The Program Administrator shall sei-~~e subject to the Board's policies, rules, regulations and instructions, and shall have the powers described in this Agreement and those delegated and assigned by the Board, including, without limitation: (1} to appoint, remove and transfer employees of SCFA, including management level officers, subject to the conditions of employment of these individuals as employees of SCFA, except for the Treasurer, Controller and Attorney of SCFA and such others as the Board may designate; (2) to enforce all orders, rules and regulations adopted by the Board relating to the regulation, operation, or control of funds, facilities, properties and apparatus of SCFA; (3} to authorize expenditures whenever the Board shall have approved and authorized any work, improvement or task and shall have budgeted or appropriated the necessary money therefore; (4) to have custody of and accountability for all property of SCFA except money. (~) The Program Administrator, with the approval of the Board, shall contract with an independent certified public accountant or firm or certified public accountants to make an annual audit of the accounts and records of SCFA, and a complete written report of such audit shall be filed as public 9 records annually, within six (6) months of the end of the fiscal year under examination, with each of the parties to this Agreement. Such annual audit and «~ritten report shall comply l~~ith the requirements of Section 6505 ofthe California Government Code. The cost of the annual audit, including contracts with, or employment of such independent certified public accountants in making an audit pursuant to this Agreement shall be a charge against funds of SCFA available for such purpose. The Board, by unanimous vote, may replace the annual audit «~~ith a special audit covering atwo-year period. (e) Consultants. Subject to the availability of funds, the Board may employ such consultants, advisors and independent contractors as are deemed necessary and desirable in implementing and carrying out the purposes of this Agreement. (f} Attorney for SCFA. The offices ofthe Riverside County Counsel, or counsel as retained directly by SCFA shall be the attoriZeys for SCFA. The Board may employ by contract or othei-~~~~ise, specialty counsel. SECTION 9. EZECUTI~%E I~Z~NAGEMENT 0011-IMITTEE There shall be an Executive IVlanagement Committee established consisting of the County Executive Officer, or designee of COUNTyr, and City Managers, or designees of CAN~'ON LAKE, LAKE ELSINORE, MURRIETA, TEMECULA and any other member city who may join SCFA. The Executive Management Committee shall meet as necessary to review the operations and business of SCFA. SECTION 10. REIl~IBL?RSEMENT Officers and employees of the parties (excepting members of the Board) designated in this Agreement to provide services for SCFA shall be reimbursed by SCFA for their actual costs of providing 10 such services. In addition, additional services provided by officers and employees of the parties pursuant to contracts with SCFA shall be reimbursed as provided by the contracts. All reimbursements by SCFA shall he made after receiving an itemized billing for services rendered. SECTION 11. FISCAL YEAR The fiscal year of SCFA shall be the period commencing July 1 of each year and ending on and including the following June 30. SECTION 12. CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE P ARTIES The parties to this Agreement may provide contributions in the form of public funds and~'or in- kind services, equipment, furnishings, ot~ice space and other kinds of property which may be reasonably necessary for SCFA to accomplish the purposes ofthis Agreement. SECTION 13. EMPLOYEES OF SCFA (a) Riverside County Employees There shall be no individuals directly employed by SCFA. "Employees" for the purposes of indemnification and defense provisions herein shall be shall mean all persons employed by Riverside County, or any member agency, and assigned to duties for SCFA. (b) Indernnitication and Defense of Employ (1) With respect to any civil claim or action against any Director, Officer, Employee, Board Member, Committee I~flember, or a person who foi7nerly occupied such position, for an injury arising out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of such person's duties, SCFA shall 11 indemnify, hold harmless and defend such person to the full eztent permitted or required under applicable sections of the California Government Code. (2) Nothing herein shall be construed to require SCFA to indemnify and hold harmless any Director, OtTicer, Employee, Board Member, Committee Member, or a person ~-ho formerly occupied such position, if SCFA has elected to conduct the defense of such person(s) pursuant to an agreement resei•~~ing SCFA's rights not to pay a judgment, compromise or settlement until it is established that the injury arose out of an act or omission occurring within the scope of his or her duties with SOFA. (3) Nothing herein shall be construed to require the SCFA to indemnify, or to provide a defense for any Director, Ot~icer, Employee, Board Member, Committee l~•Iember, or a person «-•ho formerly occupied such position where the individual has acted in an illegal, willful or intentionally negligent manner gi~•=ing rise to the claim, or litigation. (4) The follot~~ing definitions shall apply to SCFA: (i) "Directors" shall include the following: Members of the Governing Board of Directors of SOFA, and the Program Administrator. (ii) "C~t~icers" shall include all individuals «-•ho are defined in "Directors" herein, the Treasurer, Controller, and Attorneys} for SCFA as defined herein. (iii) "Employees" shall mean all persons employed by Riverside County, and assigned to duties for SCFA. (iv) "Committee Members" shall mean all persons appointed by the Governing Board to any advisory committee or committees of SCFA, all persons appointed by the Program Administrator to any advisory committee or committees of SCFA. 12 SECTION 14. LIABILITIES SOFA shall account separately for all funds collected or disbursed for each paY-ty to this Agreement. It is the intent of the parties, to the extent permitted by law, that the liabilities of each party for the animal shelter services provided to that party's members shall not become a liability of any other party to this Agreement. The debts, liabilities and obligations of SCFA shall be the debts, liabilities and obligations of SOFA alone, and not of the parties to this Agreement. SOFA shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each party to this Agreement fiom and against any and all liabilities, debts, claims, demands or costs (including but not limited to attorney's fees) arising, or alleged to arise as a result of SCFA's operation or failure to operate. SECTION 15. NOTICES Notices required or permitted hereunder shall be sufTiciently given if made in ~~~riting and delivered either personally or upon deposit into the U.S. N1ai1, first class, postage prepaid to: RIVERSIDE COLJNTY Executive Office County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 4th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Deputy County Executive Officer -Finance CITY OF CANYON LAKE 3151& Railroad Canyon Road Canyon Lake, CA 92587 Attn: City Manager III 13 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 130 South Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Attn: City Manager CITY OF MURRIETA 26442 Beckman Court Murzieta, CA 92562 Attn: City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. box. 9()33 Temecula, CA 92589 Attn: City Manager SECTION 16. OTHER AGREEA~IENTS NOT PROHIBITED Other agreements by and between the parties to this Agreement or any other entity are neither prohibited nor modified in any manner by execution of this Agreement. SECTION 17. SE~'ERaBILITY If any section, clause or phrase of this Agreement or the application thereof to any party or any other person or circumstance is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall be deemed severable and the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to the other party or other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. 14 SECTION 18. NONASSIGNABILITY The rights, Titles and interests of any party to this Agreement shall not be assignable or transferable without the written consent of the Board of Supervisors for Riverside County, and the Governing Board of any of the other parties to this Agreement. SECTION 19. A~IISCELLANEOUS (a) Section Headings. The section headings herein are for coni=enience of the parties only, and shall not be deemed to govern, limit., modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement. (b) Laws of California. This Agreement is made in the State of California, under the Constitution and laws of such State, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. (c) Construction of Lan~ua~e. It is the intention of the parties hereto that if any provision of this Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would render the provision void and the other of t~~•hich would render the pro~•~ision valid, then the provision shall have the meaning which renders it ~•~alid. (d} Cooperation. The parties to this Agreement recognize the necessity and hereby agree to cooperate with each other in carrying out the purposes of this Agreement including cooperation in manners relating to the public, accounting, litigation, public relations and the like. (e) Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the parties hereto. (f} Publication Rim ts. Each party to this Agreement shall have the right to duplicate, at its own expense, any and all documents and reports created or acquired, in the joint exercise of pot~~ers hereunder by the Board or by any other party hereto pursuant to this Agreement. 15 (g} Goveriunent Code Section 6509 Desi~ation. The laws of the State of California applicable to the COUNTY, as a general la«T county, shall govern the SCFA in the tnanner of exercising its powers, subject, ho~~~ever, to such restrictions as are applicable to said county in the manner of exercising such powers, as required by California Goveriunent Code Section 6509. /// /// lII //! /// lII /// /// III /// /// III /// /// III /// /// lII /// /// 16 IN ~~4'ITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested to by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Chair, Board of Supei-~~isors Dated: ATTEST: Nancy Romero, Clerk of the Board By: [Seal] Dated: Approved as to form and content: Joe Rank, County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel Deputy CITY OF CANYON LAKE By: Mayor, City Council ATTEST: By: Deputy [Seal] Dated: Dated: Approved as to form and content: City Attorney 17 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Mayor, City Council ATTEST: By: Deputy [Seal] CITY OF MURRIETA By: Mayor, City Council ATTEST: By: Deputy [Seal] Dated: Dated: Approved as to form and content: City Attorney Dated: Dated: Approved as to form and content: City Attorney 18 CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mayor, City Council ATTEST: By: Deputy [Seal] Dated: Dated: Approved as to form and content: City Attorney 19 ITEM NCB. S Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting Governor Schwarzenegger's Continued Funding of Proposition No. 98 at current levels to benefit California's Students (at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Maryann Edwards) PREPARED BY: Tamra Middlecamp, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RESOLUTION SUPPORTING GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER'S CONTINUED FUNDING OF PROPOSITION NO. 98 AT CURRENT LEVELS TO BENEFIT CALIFORNIA'S STUDENTS BACKGROUND: At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Maryann Edwards, this item is on for consideration. In January, Governor Schwarzenegger unveiled his proposal to offset a $14.5 billion state deficit. The governor's proposed budget would significantly reduce funding for Proposition 98, taking away $4.4 billion from public schools statewide. Temecula Valley Unified School District would lose at least $819,000, in the current fiscal year, and at least $10 million in 2008-09. This proposed cut is on top of the $6 million in cuts which our school district has suffered over the past several years. TVUSD would be forced to lay off teachers, class sizes will be increased in the upper level grades as well as K-3 classrooms. This proposal would also eliminate local school efforts to ensure up-to-date textbooks and ongoing teacher training. Temecula's youth will suffer as they pay back a deficit that they did not create. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Proposed Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER'S CONTINUED FUNDING OF PROPOSITION NO. 98 AT CURRENT LEVELS TO BENEFIT CALIFORNIA'S STUDENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, California's more than 6 million students deserve high-quality schools with well-trained educators, small class sizes, quality instructional materials, up- to-date textbooks and dynamic parental support; and WHEREAS, Governor Schwarzenegger's 2008-09 budget proposal calls for massive and devastating cuts to K-12 students and schools by reducing Proposition 98 funding by $400 million in the current year and $4.4 billion far 2008-09; and WHEREAS, A $4.4 billion cut to Proposition 98 funding would mean laying off tens of thousands of teachers statewide and would also result in increases in class size, not to mention a further erosion of the support system for students provided by classified and paraprofessional staff; and WHEREAS, Under the governor's proposed budget, Temecula Valley Unified School District would lose at least $819, 000, in the current fiscal year due to mid-year cuts and at least $10 million in 2008-09 due to the suspension of Proposition 98; and WHEREAS, Temecula Valley Unified School District has suffered more than $6 million in cuts in the last several years, damaging local efforts to ensure up-to-date textbooks and ongoing teacher training, and guarantee small class sizes; and WHEREAS, According to recently released reports and studies, California spends $1,900 less per student than the national average -seriously under funding its public schools; and WHEREAS, The governor's proposed budget reductions are fundamentally inconsistent with the state's goal of improving student achievement, at a time when our students are making progress toward meeting rigorous state and federal education standards; and WHEREAS, The "Getting Down to Facts" studies show that billions more need to be invested in education in California to ensure the opportunity for all students to succeed now and in the future: and WHEREAS, The $14 billion budget problem was not created by our students and fixing the problem should not come at the expense of their educational progress and success; and WHEREAS, California voters approved- and continued to strongly support - Proposition 98 to protect schools and students from harmful budget cuts and to establish a minimum level of education funding; and WHEREAS, The governor's budget proposal goes against the will of California voters, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED THAT that the City of Temecula strongly supports Governor Schwarzenegger's Continued Funding of Proposition No. 98 at current levels to benefit California's Students. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk ITEM NCB. 9 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Joint Powers Agreement PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Principal Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 2 to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Joint Powers Agreement BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a signatory to the Joint Powers Agreement that implements the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is governed by the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Board of Directors comprised of one elected official from each of the participating cities and five members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. On November 5, 2007 the RCA Board approved additional language to the Joint Powers Agreement that: 1) references the "Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 to authorize the RCA to finance the acquisition of property over time under the act; and 2) to modify the method of appointing alternates to the RCA Board by members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. The Amendment No. 2 is attached for your use. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Amendment No. 2 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority N J W N J ~ p, ,y d'Zw Q OW>mz ~ Q N ~ UW-ao,F°O LLYyx~ LLWd'mQ U W ~~ W gm~do W M 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12_ 13 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Amendment No. 2 dated 2007, is made by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "County," and the Cities of BANNING, BEAUMONT, CALIMESA, CANYON LAKE, CORONA, HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, MURRIETA, NORCO, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE, SAN JACINTO and TEMECULA, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Cities." RECITALS WHEREAS, the Cities and the County hereinafter sometimes jointly referred to as "Parties," are authorized and empowered to contract with each other pursuant to Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Parties, and each of them, have executed a Joint Exercise Of Powers .Agreement Creating The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ("Agreement"); and WHEREAS, section 32 of the Agreement states that there may be Amendments to the Agreement which will further define the rights and obligations of the Parties. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter stated, the Parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Revision to Powers of Aareement. (a) Revision to Section 1 of Agreement. The following language is added to the end of Section 1 of the Agreement: "Additionally, this Agreement shall permit the financing of public capital improvements and those purposes permitted under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling-Act of 1985, being Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the California Government Code (the "Bond Law")." RVPUB\KBY"xENS\7404482 i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N gw 11 J~ W ~Z OwaoZ 12 LLY~xo 13 pFwf°U gw?ao 14 m it m~ ~ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (b) Revision to Section 2 of Aareement. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: "Pursuant to the Act and the Bond Law, there is hereby created a public agency to be known as the "Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority' hereinafter referred to as the "RCA"." (c) Amendments to Section 3. A. Section 3.0 is hereby amended by inserting as the first sentence the following: "O. To exercise the powers granted to it under the Act, including, but not limited to, the Bond Law and the powers common to each member, as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement." B. Section 3.P is added to read as follows: "P. To invest money in the treasury pursuant to Section 6505.5 of the Act that is not required for the immediate necessities of the Authority, as the Authority determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the California ~ Government Code." Section 2. Revised Aareement Section 6 Reaardina RCA Board and Membership. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: "This Agreement and the authority hereby created shall be administered by the governing body of the RCA which shall be known as the "Board of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority" hereinafter referred to as the "Board." The regular members of the Board shall be the five members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and one member from each incorporated city who is signatory to the Agreement. Written notification of the appointment of a City representative shall be provided to the Chairperson of the Board. Each member of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors may appoint an alternate member and each City may appoint one alternate member. Each regular R`JPU3\iC&YRciJS\74G448.2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N aW ~ 11 J~ ~ ~Z °~a~z 12 LLY~oo 13 OFWmV ~W'-Ow 14 ¢mjao JF "' `° 15 m~ > 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I member and alternate City member must hold an elective office on the respective governing body appointing the regular or alternate member. The Board of Supervisors may appoint a city council member of a member city to represent the member as an alternate at meetings of the RCA Board or committees. Notice of the alternate appointment shall be made in writing to the chairperson of the RCA Board. In no event shall the same person serve as a city representative and alternate for the Board of Supervisor's member of the same meeting. Regular members and alternate members shall serve on the Board during the term for which they were appointed or until their successor has been appointed or their appointment has been revoked, whichever is earlier. However, a regular or alternate member's position on the Board shall automatically terminate if and when the term of the elected public office of such regular or alternate member is terminated. When a vacancy occurs, it shall be the duty of the respective Party having the vacancy to promptly inform the Board of the name of the replacement regular or alternate member. Regular members and alternate members, if participating in a meeting of the Board on behalf of a regular member, shall be entitled to compensation for participation in meetings of the Board and necessary traveling and personal expenses incurred in the performance of the member's duties as authorized by the Board. Such compensation shall be fixed by resolution of the Board." Section 3. Revised Agreement Section 17 Regarding Rules and Governing Law. Section 17 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: RVPIJB\i{B fRc"MS\740448.2 3 N 0 d W N J 7 p~ W ~ W _Q ~(7QNZ V~r°O LLYNp~ p ~wmU ~w~~W gm~ao w 0 mm > "This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Act, the Bond Law, and the laws of the State of California applicable to a general law city shall govern the RCA in the manner of exercising its ', powers, subject, however, to such restrictions as are applicable to said city in the manner of exercising such powers, as required by Government Code section 6509. The Board, at its first meeting or as soon thereafter as may be possible, shall adopt such rules and regulations as the Board may deem necessary for the conduct of the RCA's affairs. Among these rules shall be a conflict of interest code and a purchasing 1 2 3 4 5 6 ordinance. The Board may, as it deems appropriate, review and revise these rules and regulations." Section 4. Other Provisions to Remain in Effect. Except as set forth herein, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and shall govern the actions of the parties hereto and the amended provisions set forth in this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RVPUB\ICBYRF.NS\740448.2 4 ITEM NC). 1d Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - FY 2007-08 Project No. PW08-01 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer David McBride, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - FY 2007-08, Project No. PW08-01. BACKGROUND: This is an annual project which repairs various concrete facilities maintained by the City. The Public Works Maintenance Division has surveyed the City and compiled a list of improvements in need of repair. Damaged curb & gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, under sidewalk drains, cross gutters, ADA ramps, and spandrels at various locations will be removed and replaced by the project. Project specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works' office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $160,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are in the Public Works Department Maintenance Division FY 2007-2008 Budget for Routine Street Maintenance, Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Concrete Repair List. (6 pages) City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PW08-01 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF} Sidewalk or Access Ramp iSFJ Cross Gutter (SFJ Com. Drive Approach (SF} Res. Urive Approach (SF) Spandrel (SF} Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 4 11-, Ehasni s~ Park Dii . West spandrel R, & F. Spandrel 14 4 56 43195 Business Park Drive West Sidewalk R & P, Sidewalk and Access Ramp 21 6 '126 45320 &45332 Tournament Lane Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 51 51 Tournament Lane Q Clubhouse Drive (Povo locations- 16x6 and 8x6) Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 24 6 144 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Curb & Gutter R & P, Curb ~ Gutter 37 37 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Utiay Spandrel R & R Spandrel 21 5 105 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Spandrel R ~ R Spandrel 20 16 320 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Spandrel R & R Spandrel 23 5 1'15 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Side+malk R & R Sidewalk 18 6 108 Southwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Curb & Gutter R ~ R Curb & Gutter 10 10 Rancho Way Q Diaz Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 54 6 324 Northwest corner of Diaz Road and Rancho Way Spandrel R & R Spandrel 18 17 306 31045 Ruitlosa Sheet Curb & Gutter R ~ R Curb & Gutter 38 33 End of Via Gilberto -5 feet from Guard Rail Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 6 24 End o(Cul-de-Sac on Cone Anacapa (lwo Locationsl Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk & Root prune 32 6 192 45738 Creekside Sidewalk R ~ R Sidewalk 11 6 66 28075 Jefferson Avenue (easiside - 2 locations both 1 ox6J Sidewalk R & P, Sidewalk 20 6 120 28790 Las Haciendas -east of drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 7 6 42 41900 Moreno Road (motel 6) bywest drive approach Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 40 40 41900 Moreno Road (motor 6} by west drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 41900 fv'loreno Road (rnotor 6) by east drive approach Curb & Ginter R & R Curb & Gutter 72 72 Moreno Road southside'100 feet west of motel 6 Sidewalk R E R Sidewalk 45 6 270 Page 1 of 6 r+clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PW08-01 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF} Sidewalk or Access Ramp iSF) Cross Gutter (SFJ Com. Drive Approach (SF} Res. Drive Approach (SF) Spandrel (SF} Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) fll~ieno R.o~d outhside 1UU 1 Pt-rq~est of rnoiel h Gurb~ Butter R, & R Curb & Gutter 3U 30 Southeast Corner Front Street ®Moreno Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 13 I'I 143 Southeast Corner Front Street Q Moreno Road Curb & Gutter R E R Curb & Gutter 25 25 d5683 Masters Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 45715 Clubhouse Drive Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 18 6 108 45715 Clubhouse Drive Spandrel R & R Spandrel 12 7 84 Across from 31085 Via Gilberto Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 11 6 66 Across from 31085 Via Gilberto Curb & Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 12 12 Across from 31117 Lahontan Street Sidewalk R E R Sidewalk 30 6 180 Across from 31117 Lahontan Street Curb & Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 30 30 Easiside of Pujol 100 feet south o(Main Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk & Root Prune 14 6 84 Eastside of Pujol200 feet south of Nlain Sheet Sidewalk R t?<R Sidewalk 5 6 30 Across the street (corn 28405 Felix Valdez -two locations both 10 x 6. Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk & Root Prune 10 12 120 SUBTOTALS-AREA1 345 1,751 576 0 0 986 0 Pace 2 Of fi r \clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PWO8-01 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G Sidewalk or Access Ram Cross Gutter Com. Drive Res. Urive Spandrel UnderSidewalk (LF} p (SF) Approach (SF} Approach (SF) (SF} Drain (EA) iSF) :'96x;2 Corte Uopa Cur[! G Cutter R~ F, Curb & Gutter ~-' R&RSitlewalk&Root CorleAnacapa-end of theCul-tle-Sac Sidewalk 17 6 102 Prune Corte Anacapa -end o(the Cul-tle-Sac Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk & Root 20 6 120 Prune R & R Sidewalk ~ Root 31045 Corte Anacapa Sidewalk 6 6 36 Prune R&RSitlewalk&Root 41955Kaifirboom Sidewalk 22 6 132 Prune R & R Sidewalk & Root 29645 Via Los Colinas- Between both drive approaches Sidewalk g3 6 558 Prune R & R Sidewalk & Root X9645 Via Los Colinas -Between both drive approaches - Sidewalk 14 6 84 Prune R &RSitlewalk & Root 29645 Via Los Colinas -west of westerly drive approach Sidewalk 50 6 300 Prune 45 Via Los Colinas- 50 feel east of Rancho California Sidewalk P & R Sidewalk & Root 15 6 90 Ro r 29645 Via Los Colinas - westside of street 75 (eel east of R & R Sidewalk ~ Root Sidewalk 34 6 204 Rar~cl~o California Road Prune 29645''Jia Los Colinas -Southwest corner of Via Las R &RSitlewalk & Root Sidewalk 27 6 '162 Colinas Prune is Los Colinas -Southwest corner of Via Las R Sidewalk & Access C I nas Sidewalk R &n p 40 19 760 R & R Sidewalk & Root Southside of Solana Way 500 feel west o(Del Rey Road Sidewalk 30 6 180 Prune Southside o(Rancho Vista Road-100 feet east of R & P, Sidewalk & Root Sidewalk 11 6 66 Camino Romo Prune Eastsicle of Meaclo~n5 Parkway -100 Feet north of R & R Sidewalk & Root Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk Prune 17 6 102 R & R Sidewalk ~ Root Nnrlhside of La Serena - 60 (eel west o(Via Puerta Sidewalk 11 6 66 Prune Norlhsitle o(La Serena - 60 feet vaest o(Via Puerta Curb & Gutter R & P, Curb ~ Gutter 66 66 SUBTOTALS-AREA2 94 2,962 0 0 0 0 0 Pace 3 Of fi r \clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PWO8-01 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G Sidewalk or Access Ramp Cross Gutter Com. Drive Res. Urive Spandrel UnderSidewalk (LF} (SF) Approach (SF} Approach (SF) (SF} Drain (EA) iSF) North end of the Bridge peck on PJor1h General I<eamo~r Road (off Nicolas Road) cntf~eeast n I ~=estsides- iJ ~~;a14; P &F Side~malk 13 5 6'5 two locations (10x5 and 5x3) North end of the Bridge Deck on fdorih General Kearney Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 11 11 Road fo(f Plicolas Road)- on the east and west sides. Nni1h end of the Bridge Deck on North General Kearney Driveway R & R Drive Approach 10 10 100 Rnad (off f~licolas RoadJ- on the east and west sides. Approach South end of the Bridge Deck on Norfh General Kearney Road (o(f Nicolas Road)- on the east and west sides. Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 7 5 35 South end o(the Bridge Deck on North General Kearney Rnad (of( fdicolas Road)- on the east and west sides. Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 51 51 Two Locations 30 LF and 20 LF 41762 Riesling Coui1 Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 7 6 42 320?5 Pinot Blanc Under R & R Under Sidewalk 1 Sidewalk Drain Drain SUBTOTALS-AREA3 62 '142 0 0 '100 0 1 Page 4 of 6 r 1clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PWO8-01 39195 Rising Hill Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72 Noilhside o(Winchester Road Q9N) northwest corner into Pep Boys Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10 ~Nestside of Ynez Road 100 noilh of Winchester Road Sidewalk R ~ R Sidewalk 4 6 24 (%9fJ) Easiside of Ynez Road Q Solana Way- East and West Sides of Catch Basin Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 23 23 Northeast Corner of Winchester Road {79N) Q Nicolas Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 14 5 70 R&RSidewalk&Root 26201 Ynez Road Sidewalk 25 6 150 Prune SUBTOTALS-AREA4 33 316 0 0 0 0 0 Page 5 Of fi r `~clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls City of Temecula FYa7/08 f}epartment of Public Works Concrete Repair List Project No. PW08-01 32211 Wolf Creek Drive Q Fire Station Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 10 200 Vail Ranch Parkway (northsitle of street) Between R & R Sidewalk & Root Terzich Drive and Overland Trail Sidewalk Prune 21 6 126 Vail Ranch Par{nvay norihside - 300 feet west of Camino R & R Sidewalk & Root Piedra Sidewalk Prune 36 6 216 SUBTOTALS-AREAS 0 542 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 634 6,713 576 0 100 986 1 Pace fi Of fi r \clplprojectslp~ra081pwG8-01 citywide pax repairs5fy07-C8 repair lislxls ITEM NC). 11 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Slurry Seal Project FY 2007-08, Paloma del Sol Area, Project No. PW08-02 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer David McBride, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Slurry Seal Project FY 2007-08, Paloma del Sol Area, Project No. PW08-02. BACKGROUND: The Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY2007-2008, is an annual project that will utilize a Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (REAS) to seal the project roadways against water intrusion and deterioration of asphalt concrete pavement wearing surface. Ideally slurry seal is applied every five to seven years as it prolongs pavement life thereby delaying more costly rehabilitation measures such as asphalt concrete overlays or removal and reconstruction. Slurry sealing involves cleaning and crack sealing the existing roadway surface, applying the REAS and restoration of pavement delineation. Staff has defined the street locations based on current pavement conditions, time elapsed since the last preventative maintenance measure and geographical proximity. The area to be sealed this year is a portion of the Paloma del Sol area and two commercial streets that are in need of maintenance. Project specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works' office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $450,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are in the Public Works Department Maintenance Division FY 2007-2008 Budget for Routine Street Maintenance, Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Slurry Seal List (2 pages) PW08-02 Citywide Slurry Seal Street Name Length Width Paying Area (SF) Street Type Amanita Way 5,71 1 40 228,459 Collector Cala Carrasco 1,357 36 48,870 Local Cala Rosso 450 36 16,217 Local Calle Ballentine 2,238 36 80,558 Local Calle Barcaldo 848 36 30,524 Local Calle Espinosa 1,233 36 44,373 Local Calle Espirito 205 36 7,366 Local Calle Jeminez 778 36 27,990 Local Calle Novelda 1,763 36 63,463 Local Calle Veronica 519 36 18,695 Local Calle Casillas 1,004 36 36,141 Local Corte Abanilla 567 36 20,405 Local Corte Albano 617 36 22,202 Local Corte Algete 995 36 35,820 Local Corte Almeria 2,014 36 72,489 Local Corte Almonte 1,419 36 51,077 Local Corte Avalina 433 36 15,588 Local Corte Ayala 261 36 9,403 Local Corte Benavente 1,310 36 47,177 Local Corte Benisa 255 36 9,171 Local Corte Benitez 427 36 15,362 Local Corte Cabello 412 36 14,835 Local Corte Cabrera 1,787 36 64,321 Local Corte Calanda 791 36 28,469 Local Corte Cardin 314 36 11,308 Local Corte Colucci 244 36 8,771 Local Corte Landeras 373 36 13,443 Local Corte Logrono 574 36 20,660 Local Corte Montilla 555 36 19,976 Local Corte Pollensa 1,125 36 40,486 Local Corte Priego 559 36 20,130 Local Corte Rimola 759 36 27,337 Local Corte Salamanca 948 36 34,136 Local Corte Siero 337 36 12,138 Local Corte Tolosa 669 36 24,098 Local Montelegro Way 3,849 44 169,335 Collector Santiago Road 1,197 78 93,347 Arterial Via Barraza 736 36 26,513 Local Via Campanario 1,254 36 45,142 Local Via Caro 277 36 9,967 Local Via Cerda 206 36 7,412 Local Via Denzo 196 36 7,065 Local Via Gandia 429 36 15,427 Local Via Guerro 210 36 7,547 Local Via Nanzo 288 36 10,367 Local Via Rami 905 44 39,809 Collector Via Raya 184 36 6,623 Local Via Ricci 248 36 8,915 Local Via Rivas 182 36 6,536 Local Page 1 of 2 PW08-02 Citywide Slurry Seal Street Name Length Width Paying Area (SF) Street Type Via Rows 491 36 17,690 Local Via Las Colinas 1,280 38 48,640 Commercial Calle Empleado 600 53 31,800 Commercial ITatal 1,793,593 Square Feet I Page 2 of 2 ITEM NC). 12 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Reimbursement of Development Impact Fees pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.06.200 (BRSC, LLC; Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center and Self Storage; Parcel Map No. 33545) PREPARED BY: Dan York, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the BRSC, LLC Reimbursement of Development Impact Fees (DIF) between the City of Temecula and BRSC, LLC, in the amount of $189,570.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On July 20, 2005, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA04-0621 (Development Plan for Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center) and 05-0066 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 33545). On March 1, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA05-0189 (Development Plan for Butterfield Self Storage). The project is located at the southeast corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. The associated Conditions of Approval (COA) require construction and installation of half the raised landscaped median on Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road adjacent to the development. The Developer constructed 850 lineal feet of raised landscaped median on Temecula Parkway and 837 lineal feet of raised landscaped median on Butterfield Stage Road. In addition, the City required the Developer to extend the raised median from the northerly property boundary to approximately 178 feet southerly on Butterfield Stage for public safety reasons. The Developer completed the median construction and has paid the required DI F for the project at the time building permit issuance. The DIF paid for this project was $ 662,861.49. The Developer has applied for DIF Reimbursement for the cost of half of the 14 foot raised landscaped median fronting their property, which was $ 153,446.25, and 100% of the cost beyond the project frontage, which was $36,124.50. These improvements qualify for reimbursement because it meets the definition of Regional Improvements in the approved DIF program. City staff has verified the invoices and has confirmed that the amount eligible for DIF Reimbursement is $189,570.75. FISCAL IMPACT: Refund from the CIP project, Medians-Citywide, in the amount of $189,570.75. ATTACHMENTS: Reimbursement Agreement AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.06.OS0 (BRSC, LLC; BUTTERFIELD RANG"H SHOPING CENTER AND SELF STORAGE; PARCEL A~IAP NO. 3354 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and BRSC, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer"). In consideration of the mutual agreements and circumstances set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following purposes and facts that each of the parties agrees to be true and correct. A. On July 20, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approved Planning Application Nos. PA04-0621 (Development Plan} and OS-0066 (Tentative Parcel Map No.33545 and on March 1, 2006, the Plaiuiing Commission approved Planning Application No. PA05-0189 (Development Plan and Conditional L1se Permit), collectively the "Project Approvals." B. Condition Nos. 61a, 61b, 30a, 30b, 56a, and 56b of the Project Approvals requires Developer to construct and install certain raised landscaped medians on Butterfield Stage Road and on Temecula Parkway ("Improvements"). C. Pursuant to Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Developer paid to the City the sum of $662,861.49 in Development Impact Fees ("DIF"). D. The Improvements are regional or regionally significant public facilities listed on the City's Capital Improvement Plan as being funded with Development Impact Fees established under Chapter 15.06 ofthe Temecula l~lunicipal Code. E. Pursuant to Section 15.06.050.B.2. the Developer made a timely request for reimbursement of the funds it expended for the Improvements but not to exceed the amount of its DIF paid to the City. F. The Director of Public W ork has certified the completion of the Improvements as being completed in accordance with approved plans and the Capital Improvement Plan and has certified that the costs of the construction of the Improvements is reasonable. 2. Reimbursement of DIF. Pursuant to Section 15.06.OSO.B.2 the Developer is entitled to a partial reimbursement of its DIF in the amount of one hundred eighty nine thousand five hundred seventy dollars and seventy five cents ($189,570.7}) for the Improvements. These improvements qualify for reimbursement because it meets the definition of Regional Improvements in the approved DIF program. Said amount shall be paid to the Developer within ten days of the date of this Agreement. Nothing herein shall preclude Developer from seeking further reimbursements of its DIF pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.06.OSO.B.2. 1030515.1 2`7;'08 3. General. A. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, concerning the subject matter of this Agreement are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. B. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts and legal research such party deems material. Each party warrants and represents to the other that it has had the opportunity to revie~~~ this Agreement with legal counsel and financial consultants and to receive the advice of legal counsel and financial consultants prior to its approval and execution of the Agreement. C. This Agreement shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as if prepared by both parties hereto. Any i-~zle of law (including, without limitation, California Civil Code Section 1654) or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this Agreement against the party that has drafted it is not applicable and is hereby waived. D. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. E. The person executing this Agreement on behalf ofthe Developer warrants and represents to the City that this Agreement has been duly approved by the Developer and that all applicable notices and procedures were complied with and that he is duly authorized by the Developer to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Developer and has been duly authorized to do so. //// //// 1030515.1 2/7108 2 IN «1ITNESS ~?t~HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF TENTECULa, a municipal corporation Mike Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan ~~. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 1030515.1 2`7;'08 BRSC, LLC, a California limited liability contpan`~ Name: Title: Name: Title: 1030515.1 2/7108 4 ITEM NC). 13 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 33421, Temecula Corporate Center Dan York, Deputy Director /City Engineer PREPARED BY: Chris White, Assistant Engineer -Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 33421 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Cash Deposit as security for the agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 33421 is a two (2) parcel subdivision map to subdivide 15.37 gross acres into 2 commercial lots, located on the East and West side of Via Industria and South of Roick Drive, Certain street improvements associated with the development of this map are required. The survey monuments are required to be set. The owners of the property: Temecula Corporate Center, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company. A joint venture with P-F Venture LLC, A California Limited Liability Company and Pres Investments, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company. On September 21, 2005, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 33421, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative parcel map. Temecula Corporate Center, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company has met all of the Conditions of Approval. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the approved tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State Law. The site is currently under construction FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fees & Securities Report 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Parcel Map No. 33421 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 33421 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project. FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Flood Control (ADP} Paid. Development Impact Fee This fee will be collected prior to issuance of building permits. CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 33421 DATE: February 26, 2008 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 Monumentation $ 7,950.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES RCFC&WCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid Development Impact Fee $ *TBD SERVICE FEES Planning Fee $ 319.00 Fire Fee $ 226.00 TCSD Fee $ 155.00 Plan Check Fee $ 3,801.00 Monumentation Inspection Fee $ 300.00 Fees Paid to Date $ 4,801.00 Balance of Fees Due $ 0,00 *To Be Determined CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 33421 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project. FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Flood Control (ADP) Paid. Development Impact Fee This fee will be collected prior to issuance of building permits. CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT. PARCEL MAP NO. 33421 DATE: February 26. 2008 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 Monumentation $ 7,950.00 DEVELOPMENT FEES RCFC&WCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid Development Impact Fee $ *TBD SERVICE FEES Planning Fee $ 319.00 Fire Fee $ 226.00 TCSD Fee $ 155.00 Plan Check Fee $ 3,801.00 Monumentation Inspection Fee $ 300.00 Fees Paid to Date $ 4,801.00 Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00 *To Be Determined _ KCT CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineers -Surveyors- Planners __,~. "" P.O. Box 5705 Riverside, CA 92517-5705 4344 Latham St., Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: 951-341-8940 Fax: 951=341-8945 e-mail: kctinc@kctconsultants.com CRO55 AREA IS.3J NETARG 15.3] NUMRERm PARCELS: 2 Mf[OIY/R7~~'I~N~CiIMTOl0l`isiL~iROwONwRIEM SHEET I OF 3 SHEETS ~~ '~y^ ~ ~~ R6ORB ER'S ~ATEYENT ~. FOR CONOOYINIIIY MNIPO6F5 M_ r xwxL_anRea aAas xa OWNER'S STATEMENT I{£ I/fRIDV STAT£ nHi NE ARE ]NE OMNER9 Of ll2 LYN M1YUP9 MrlRx TI£ SUBOA7.ATe 9pMN II0.ELV/' ]IMT ME ARE ]HE dYY HRSdR' xNY LYYEfM b Htmsstm ro vAU A HEIR TmE ro 549 1.vn]; Timor xE cnHSaTr ro THE ANYMC ANO RECORgAG m ms slrecwmaT AMR As sxoex wnHRT THE nsaucmE eaMEM LmE xE iffRmr BEarAnrc Aeunob ax1TTS of ACCES ALahc 9x uww]hx ro Trr Mmr. THE oxmb of vARau 1 aro z aeurnnr+ rxb xwwwr AHO oLTMHC suol Ter WnL INY£ nro RXMS eF ACLk15 IX6EPT THE CENER4. FAROJEIV/ M' iP.1YEZ FACIDBNO >iE TIW) SLY/Y i)Y£ faOT eMAE ACCESS E1Y]I9(a oNE EACH FOR PARCEi.S I ANO 2 iVID MO FORT/ FWT xBE ACCFSS OPF19Nq 0.1E FALN ELH PAMCfLR I AM{ AS SHOMN hEREpT. AAT [H4R:E OF AUGNWIT OR WdAll ilxT RESY/Lr9 M rNE WGR0.e mWEW sH4L TERJ1axrE mb amrwTraT As ro THE vARr vAdTm. ME HEREBY /rTAN! ME fASfMDRS M'UC11ED As PRNATE Q4.VHNF FASFM£Nr FM P.eNAE USE Tae THE EaLE ewEFrr a ouRS¢vEt aTa swxTSORS, Asex¢s, AM LBr elwrRS MIn&I Txb rAxc¢ law. It1kLY/u LTlFFgxE CFNTFM TLC, A aMAX'ARE !elliEa (L9BIUlY CYM/PAVI' eT: A BENEFICIARY: CRY dliaw. BAfp: A dTiaw. EIWARM A4LWIAXy HlVfF1ClN1' fAVOER O® OF (RUST RECPPBfD AUGUST ). 1008 AS MbIRUHELlf Atl. Ta06-a5)IIFO, CR ~: TnlE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STAI£ OV' LOUNTI'!E ON np5 _ dY OF _. 1a]), BEFORE AE THE U.RL19t$NBrD. A IpiARY PUMTC m AHB iDR SAlO SIA]E PFA501WLY.wFE1.eED Ah9 PERSaWELY IG1tlW ro ME (aR PROVED ro ME p/ Tiff fl65%S OF SITT3AL]M/ EYIA'A~ ro Er mE PMssaH(5) xrwsE xwE(s) 5/Alr 5lbSCRRFD ro nE xmw RLnMTJIEHr AM AG01WwIDCE ro xE Timor xF/sE/nRr EXEaurm TTff suE m IpSiHEf1//HBR AuTTaR® J Aw Tiur B/ Hb/F1A/RNW scru REE(s) av TTE az]MTwBVr mE PERSOH[s, aR TTr EMTIY uvaN eFExIF rx xvxR mE PEItfON(5) ACTED, EXEDwm Tir avsrRLlLr1Tr. xmLa w xva ANO oEEkLV sBV: rY mwRArov EXMREs HorARr vuLWTC RF ae Fae SAl0 slam MY PRMCPK MM£ CF BImVESS b /N GWMY. NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT SL1E (E COUMY Q< aN RBS - dY (Y _. 1aJ), Bt]dTE ME .riff aADFR9CNED, A AtliMY FU9.l" x ANO FAe S40 SIA7E PER50.WLLY APPFAlrD MD PEItSa'xLLY HADe'ro xE (oR PAVYFD ro AE pl nr 8195 of 511AFACroRY fl'iDFT'CE) ro BE THE FER50.V(5) x%9E RUr(5) R/ARE SrE6CRUEa m mE xmw MRIMDRM AIO AamexmcE ro vE rlxr x[/s¢/nLEr ENECLRID nE suE x xb/xEH/nTBR A(R/T0.P® a1PaaTMLESJ aHD mEr ar xb/rmynRTR SGd I[Mff(S) OVI Ild' BISmULFrTI DE PERSON(S). OR rHE ENTnI" UPWI BETWF Qc excx mE PERSg1(5) ACTED. EutnTm nr mmRVUeNr. MIRIES NY INNa ANa a`FKJV. SEAL' NY CWMISIMI IX%fl6" TpTARY PUBLC m 0.4 FDR SIIO 5/AI£ A/Y PRACB•K FL1CE Qa° BU[tlTESS b M TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I Hf]lEln' S/AI£ DNT ACCNRdM9 TD DE RECCROS a<Ti/b dF1Uff AS ~ ]iRS d1E THERE ARE NO LIEITS AGMMT Tiff FMOPFAP' SIE)wN aV THE xnmv Yw FTAe UAP.RO 5x1{ LgTMY, A/UNKYK OR EL(Yi. TAXES' CR SP£CW. A556.91FAR5 Cd/ECTO AS TANFB, IXEYPI ]AMPS M SPECW. ASSFSSYEMS CgEECIFD AS iAN£5 NBW A UD1' BUT /pT Y£T PAYA&F MH.C{l ARE 6/9g1£B ro BE 1 d1E P.1W. At00.VAO1 CWMY )AX CaL(EL'Iae ~: uR aey u.l.. en JUNE 200] elBYtnNdouWMFB SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT woArlaW'wTem TnLE Mb AW IC45 MFPARID 9V Ib M 1/NCER AIY SWERNSNMI AYD b BISfD CW A MG 514RrEY W P36APIW.Ct' M11/I Ill MWA1fARlRS OF THE 9R0.YLIXAY ANP ACT M9 E ~J AT m£ REG.6rlY ]EIIELYRA L[NPmdE CEMFR /1G W I xmmr sTArE Trxr nBS raxv. wLw svm]AVnvar croxfaeMS ro Tir cronmrlaxulr AFP.PoYFD TEHLIThE JNP. Tlxr ALa JpNUMEHI3' ARE a< nE crLARACER A40 acriwr nE vesnions 9A]M.1 cw Tiwr mtv wvt eE sEr m nx>g ra9nab xnxx orE rEle TA'IY TIff /22YAPM dTE L1c Thy 4W. THE MGWAeMS xLL aE sURKYE//T ro Ed&£ TIE SURVEY Rl RE RETR.ICEe. THE SfM1EY b rRL£ A10 ttWHEIE As SIIJXM \WJE IAb FMC S CVRRFIL P.LS )fAT ~~39~RT 8 uc EXP. Izpr/e) dTe RE CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT HFAEeY STAIF RNi neS 4w LYNASSM.C CF nINE£ (Jlµ~ Hle BEEH E%WHID BY xE as BAHAR xr MTVE4wswIT AAa inLRLO ro 6E Suasr r rxr.uuE As H AFPGREa 0.e ]HE rfNTAINE Alw a< PMCEL ARP 3H1I AS FiLID A40 APPROVED 6Y THE CnY LY IEAELYXA CH BEP/E1rER 21. ' S. Rb EX%R11e.W drE H]M: SNAIAR Yf. 2W1, river Au PAnwsa/s rr AAYAXtlE sxTE uw AHB an RKf9ATpN9 dLE aDv crLeHED wnlE AND Trxr r aR 51ibFiFD Tlur mb LxP b TEacwdur cDRlrcr. GWIfL A ITMI:, ftCE M. fi111y LS ]961 CnY ETCM1VFER CITY OF TE4ECY/LI IXP9E11XM' d1E J/JI/M are CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT nE CRY CWNCY. OF THE CT' BF IEANdAA STAE OF CAUFAeIµ BY RS CnY CIFRh' S/SW W. J0.4E5 YM n HrAEB/ APRU4ES ]HE PAM1 .WP. WE HEREBY ACCEPT 11E d]FR CF fND.R.IIXAR eF ABUTTERS REMS OF ACCL4 ALOH0 VN FYCVB/.e{l aIm Dar dr of ,zoo) susw w...ewES JdC an rx2ne arc a<>ExECIM TAX BOND CERTIFICATE I HFH®Y GFIEY ]INi A 6pO /N rHE 51/Y d T Hl5 Be'EY IXECUIEn A!/O T]IID MIIH riff N'I6) C1Y SYFIXYD0.e5 (E rHE C'WMY CF RAaRSmE cvTFavul cnHanavm uFav mE vArR6Hr of Au rAVES rrarE: cmnTn: wuwrsa ae Eacv, wvD All sFm4. A4ESiY0R5 axEEDEn As rAi9s MW/ Ai nE rNE M'TY/M'i ~ rlb5' Nw xM THE LCNRY RECdIXR AQF A I/fN AaWhT SNa PA1Y4R/Y BUr IpT YET PAYABLE /Na SVa 60.80 Hoe Bm1 WLY APAM4ID BY S4a BalRa ac SIMERl3aRS drs. dTe I[IMLY MW0.tl G91 TAY 6tlb QQM' LK rIL' IV\'N !X SVHRLbYWS FAUG IINa'WFI. COUNT' FIX COlIECT0.e Er awnY er. SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: Fe/R91NNT ro sEDTpN 864.]8 oP Trr sumWSDn' rAw ACT, THE srcHAmaE_s aF nE FMLLHHAf] axTDb CR EA9ErJnns AHD ammo mTExEsb dLE eEEN Ee9TRD mEwr uTTDm]s eDHC sLCx TdrW amEA' uNO RE AN Et4MWT rtW PoLE LIRECC 4gVBUR9 0.'t IWCER(M~IXND FACNmS pR6O56 M FALOR OF SOUn9RN CA(Xa9M EDbTRI Cd/-MY A C0.9GWIXM' RECMAED JINUIM' 9, I9)S A9 RbMUMdr Ip. JWq 0.R AN FASEAIdT RESERVE FDR Dr USE A4D BFNFEf7r OF SEYFRIL AURAMeZEO FYI&.C M9/C1P WRW URNLES m FALDR OF KILge RFN.7r 6. n flELCWdD JWE 11. IWq Nb'IRf/YEeT N0. I1lRll. 0.R. AS YpaB1ED pE1! OaCfgIfMS RELYgLMD ffHTYW/ 2r. 1990. AS MS'IRUIYSRB N0. BBIW AN9 QBI0.5. 0.R .VT F.l6flrl9r PAT SE11FEt GAMES PURHARES M FAITAp CF N4SER LEHIWHENf CW-AYI, A WTa'MN odMaeanav ANa XEAAQE (XXF fll/d A CYNAPNM LHRhD ftMNIN9M RECGNMD INROI 2r. ]8~. Ae MTMpRM ltl. JST92 aR Ae L15ELBVT TCK WATER MPQMES HflHiLl56 N F11OR ~ RARYJp CVYaR/W WATER D~ RELg2YD KPoL Il. ZCtl). A9 WS/MMEM R0. SWT-016))49. 0.R. NOTICE OF ELECTION BV LAND DIVIDER TO DEFER PAVMENTOF DRAINAGE FEES gNEneA tn/ISV .4TFA ORIIIx¢ M.1N xxR WAS AOa^!ED BY ]HE B[WTO d' swERwsaes of THE avu4rr a• anER9DE Mmwa.N ro sECraN fogs a aMNNVICE 160 ARO SECIAIe 661W, Ef. SED. aF THE aIYFRNNeM 0.roE AhD 540 PAgMRf' b sDBTECr ro EES inR sEro LMeARUCE AREA ip1.C£ b HEFkSY 9YEN ]INi mb PRaY/Rf' b LOd)FD M THE wivucr~ eee2T(/ IwTar r FT/Rmpt L»n. Tdr. PWSIMNf ro sEDTwH IBZS of a9mTwLCE 460. mE u4o dwuR HAB ETLTTTED ro DEFER varuEnT of rxE 0.41eU9E FF2 ro mE nuE oT ssaux.'E a-a sRAa4c ae edanD FYRN? FDR sva vARCEU AM mAr THE OeN£R aF FApI PARCYI. AT RE 1&E ac /SAUIKE of ETMER A LilAa'NO OR euXmxo PFRLr2 sxuG eE REauRED ro Par mE iEE aECrnRm ar rNE RA1f x EFFECT AT THE IBE OF bSWME OF mE ACnldl FERN//. IN TISDTIraTITT~uA alRNnslweuclc wDEwcr~aErL PARCEL MAP 33421 FOR CONDONINIUY PURPOSE DEINO A SIIDDMSION OF PAACEL4 S TINOIlp1 17 INCUISIVE OF rAUEt. uFr 2U73, AS SHORN ON N1P RECORDED IN BO01C T01 OF PAILCEI. TAWS, AT PAGE34{ Mtglpi 47. INCWSIVE RECOIm3 OF RIVERSIDE COIR7IY. CNJiDIdl1A LYING NIMIN 71E TEYECIRA RNIC110. T'MCFL510. II AI/il 12 AISO DEING PARCH.A,OF CFNTIFlCAIE OF PARCEL NERGE1t N0. PA03-OTS, RECORDED WY S7.2WJ AS INSIRIAIENf N0. 2003-378DI0, OFFlCVIL ROCOPOS OF $4D COUNTY. KLT (XSNSULTAPTT3, INC. RIVERSIDE, EA JUNEIW] PARCEL MAP 289]3 .~,3 3 ~LCt P MpQ ~ BpepR P a r, ~ ~ - - _ _ Na YI g ,z °' ~ ow i i a~ _ PARCEL 2 , i YNB Ae IET AF/ a' , 1 U ~ I•/ADI I IRRft Q 111~10~IpIE~KNIE ~ 1 I YMYIIGAI R II ~~ xD _~ 1 ~- !; -- _ 1 ~YK h ii ry 11 I Ip~~~ 11 ___ 1 1 -- \ + C I^ ~` ~ \ i APR T P~ ~O ~// ~ ; ~ .~~,~ ' , ,~, PARCEPM o~aaa~ Y~ h YPw6 . _ .~R P~~ a~~p ca~ra ,a^e~.o~z:~~b ~ . ~-_~__ I~~ \\\ ` \ \ ~ i YMT ~o PAR MP. ~e955~z e~ 9 VtIXIL X N.i.S DETAIL "R" r.s i I 1~ 11 1 i } DETAIL"C" I NTS I T I I I L ems..-- ' -~n.~ -~.es ~Syve ~ I io NSLNtJ~ ~'"°' 1s' IM°""' 1 z' I zs 12 II 1 DETAIL"D" I 1 I NrR I~FRIIIDUlYIMa PARCELM APG~%a/SD I 1 PARCELP mpP6iliso ENVIROMY~fTAL CONSTRAM NOTEI BOUNDARY CONTROL AND JNDEX MAP sue P-lan G so lDD zoo Boo aoo sGLE: I wcx= loo iEEi SIkiVEYOR'3 NOTES BASIB OFBFIRINGR BGRINOB IRE S18FD DN llE CFNIDBINE OFVM INOUSIRIA BEINL NSI'OB'K`M PFIt PARCEL WPT31J3. RECORDED IN BDDK SDI, OF PARCEL LUPS AT PILES K 1HROLXRI4) • IIIDIGTe3 fWND 1"IP, LS M35 RLLLSI4 PFR PARCEL YIP IDA)S, P.IL Z01/M-4), IIMF55 NOTED OTIERNISE O IXOIGIES SEE I" IPA181 TID LS TI83 F W511(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED} DOOD INDIGIE RISORD GTA PFR PAR(11 YM SBR)S, PL.S ~/M-Q. i111R1 INDIGl6 REGIRICIED VOIIOLEACC65 RNR05 Dt) INDIGl6 RNlW. LINE FIMRONYFMAICONIGINT BTIEEFAfiECDNGTHIS 1UP IS ON FRE IN l1E OFFlCE Oi INE Cm ENGINEER. Cm OFRNEpIG IN EC.A BOOK t PIDE_ 1HBARFDiS (fNN:EI(S) EASEMENT NOTES O fJfISTNG EASEMENTS O IH FA41Rlf fOR PIXE LINES WNWRS qt DNDERGRWND IACILDl6 PURP3561N fANDR OFYJNXFAII GW FpiNM EOISON CDYPANY, ACCRPOItAT10N Rf1GNi0DlJANUNO' 0, ISJI AG INSRBAAM. ND. 3180. OR Qt AN FASEYFM RESDNEfDRIIS USEANO BENEFROi SEVERN. NRNg11ZE0 PIIBLICMD/OR ODIFA UDLRI6IN PAY9R Oi KILOR RELLIY, IHC.. JIME 31, 16141N5f. ND. IZ1011, O.R AS YODIFlFD PFR OOCUYENOE RECORDED iEBRLLNt! Z3. ISBG AS INSR8IYENIS INT. BRIG N8) 88105, OR 0 AN GSdFNTfOR SEWIX LING %BiPo561N FAVIM CF KNSFR DEYLOPNENf WYPAM',AGWfORNM E0160MRON, AID M'fSI51CE DqF C111B, A G4FDRNIA l1YRED PMINElg11P REGORGED WACH?S IS86 AR INSDKNENE. N0. )Di B1, D.R. Q AN FASDIFM FOR T/ATFR PIPDIN6 PIRiP056 IN FAWR OF RM1CIp.GLFCRNUWAIFA DISTRICT., REGORGED NNIIL I), 100). AS IXSDNX@TT. N0. 20Q)-025T)K, O.R IN THE CDY GFIEMFFUU, CMMRYOi RNFRSID[ SPATE OF V' LFdUIIA SHELT 3 OF 3 SHEEfB PARCEL MAP 33421 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 5 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP 28473, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 201 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 44 THROUGH 47. INCLUSIVE RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LYINC WITHIN THE TEMECUTA RANCHO. PARCELS I0, II AND 12 ALSO BEING PARCEL A , OF CERTIFICATE OF PMCEL MERGER N0. PA03-025, RECORDED MAY 2], 2003 AS INSDiUME1N N0. 2003-3]8310, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF 541D COUNTY. KCI' CONSULTANTS, INC. zao ~ P ~ _~: m~ aavrAroTEs NT PARCEL MAP 33421 FOR COIIDOYINIW FN1RP06E5 eElxo A sussmslDN a r~ACEis s 7lnallcx u IxaisR,E aE RARCFL luv 2N73, AS SNO4N ax ipP RECOIEDED IN BDOIC %11 OF PARP.EL iNP3, AT PAGES 4471RiO10N 47, INCLVSMi RECORDS OF RRRASIDE COIMIY, dIJf0RNL1, LYING RIIFIIN 71E 7ELECOA RMICIIO. PARCF1510, II NO O AL50 BFJNO PARCFLA,OF ODRTIFlWEfN'PARCEL /EADFR N0. PMS-078, RECOROFD WY T7.2WJ As IxsnsARNr Na 7aa}s7sn0, aPFlC1AL RECORDS aF sus wlRnr. SCC CnNSULTANI$ INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT RIVERSIDE. G JUNE 2007 lE PR041IIY O IOGI® tRM 70OY r~ O `"` ~• YOM PAIOW d1f111N701R ALL IRDlOtD IIOIRIIS 81886 lINL CORY Oll K OilgNA E6RR16 a 1®108RY PNWB as®IM1an PANL : M^ ozro<';, I I ~ 16caRnawor, o6wiNZ xa m oL,w-r I I .~ I I I ~-=^_~±p!r tea, I ~~ o ao fio ~iZO teo ao t' LJ-________1__r / ~ I ~~ L -{_ SCALE: 1 INLH = 6D fEET ~/ 'ys` As+s3F +InA _I t Paz< I P.rz ~3 PPRCE~ MPP0~8a<3 / ~(-~ OYIy ~i i/ 4Y µ. N~ I \ T ~ n~ Wa r <= ~_ " 3 d R k 'a F - P~ r yaA~~.9o Pie` PM. ~~5 P~.:3 Pnrsce~pM g?4aeo a~.s. II .,.~.: *sr.varra ~s.vmssml ITEM NC). 14 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Proposition 1 B (Transportation Bond) Allocations and Funding Proposals PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Approve the attached Proposition 1 B Local Streets and Roads Funding Proposals list for Fiscal Year 2007-08 and Fiscal Year 2008-09 and authorize staff to apply to the State Department of Finance for release of $1,575,218 in Proposition 1 B funds for these projects. 2. Amend the approved FY 2007-08 Public Works Maintenance Division Budget for Citywide Street Maintenance to reflect $750,000 of Proposition 1 B funding. BACKGROUND: In 2006, California voters approved Proposition 1 B (Prop 1 B - Transportation Bond) authorizing the sale of over $1 billion in bonds for infrastructure improvements. Prop 1 B specified that a portion of the bond proceeds be allocated directly to cities and counties for infrastructure repairs. These revenues are intended to supplement existing investments in local streets and roads. One of the goals of the program is to demonstrate to the public the benefit of these investments, reinforce the importance of voting for Prop 1 B, and to encourage support for future investments. The City of Temecula's total share of Prop 1 B revenues is expected to be $3,065,531. Under Assembly Bills 193 and 196, cities are entitled to apply for the release of a portion of these funds in FY 2007-08 and the remainder in FY 2009-10. The amount available for release to the City of Temecula in this first allocation is $1,575,218. It should be noted that the State has not determined if all or a portion of the remaining funds will be allocated to cities and counties in FY 2009-10. The State Department of Finance (DOF) is now accepting applications for the first funding allocation. I n order to apply for these funds, the City Council must approve the projects expected to be funded with Prop 1 B funds before an allocation can be made. The funding will ensure that ongoing roadway repairs (pothole filling, crack filling, pavement patching) and non-driving surface work (ADA/sidewalks) are maintained at current levels, and a slurry seal project is completed in the Paloma Del Sol development. The City of Temecula is proposing to allocate the $1,575,218 in Prop 1 B funds as follows: Fiscal Year Prap 1 B Funding Allocation Project Proposal 2007-08 $300,000 Pavement Repair -Citywide $450,000 Slurry Seal -Paloma Del Sol 2008-09 $300,000 Pavement Repair -Citywide $275,218 Slurry Seal -Paloma Del Sol $250,000 Non-Driving Surface Work (A DA/sidewalks} Total $1,575,218 FISCAL IMPACT: The requested action will initiate the application process with the State Department of Finance for release of $1,575,218 in Proposition 1 B funds for the roadway work identified on the attached listings. The current FY 2007-08 Maintenance Division Budget far Citywide Street Maintenance will be amended to reflect $750,000 in Prop 1 B funding. The remaining $825,218 in Prop 1 B funding will be allocated to the Citywide Street Maintenance account as part of the FY 2008-09 budget process. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposition 1 B Local Streets and Roads Funding Proposals 2. Streets in Paloma Del Sol to receive slurry seal with Prop 1 B funding in FY 2007-08 and 2008-09 o ~ N { N N o ~ 0 m x o ~ o v -° 0 D ^. ~ o. D W '~ T ~ N ~ O m " r m ~ m` ~ 3 ~ ~ w ~ Q - v m 3 a m n 0 A 0 c 3 m 'D --~ ~ ~ .m ~_ o ~ O N ~ ~ ~' n.cn 4i a- o~ m ~ O O ~. ~~ a n ~ N ~ m v v n~ (D fD tD N O S lD tD n m cD O (D N O O '~ r 0 n N lD m S?~ 0 m Q v ~~ m m n m O (D C7 3~ lD al 7 (7 (D 7 O ~ r~ -I -I ~ ~nrn~ o°?_ °O °~D~mz~.o>> n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ n ~ `~ ~ ~ ~' r -, ~. ~ n ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ Z D m 3 ~, m o ~m ~, ~no o•o m _~ -a o N ~ -~3 ~ ~ a ~ ~ W O (~D O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ m a a ~, cn cn o• ~ a o' ~ n~ ~. C> - m o "~ ~ o o N c ~ O ~ ~ K 0 ~ ~ N ~ Q. o ~ c ~ ~c n~ ~ cp' a W N~ N n -a o ~ ~ o '~ ~ O O ~ ~ o ~ N c~ ~ O ~_ O ~ C ~ ~ W ~ ~' n1 c v O = fl. ~ O ~ v ~' '-. cD 3 ~ d C fn ~ n .~ lp S ~ Ql ~ ~ `< ~ W ~ v ~ a a n ~p O m ~ ~' n Q ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ c ~. o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? o - (J = w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ C ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ n N ~ p~ O ~ O N D ~ o ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~' ~ CD ~. i cD ~ _... O W O ~ ~ W ~ ~J v (J~ U1 N N .~ _... ~ ~ N O O V O v w -o z ~ p = ~ ~ ~ o m ' CDaocn Drn~ ~ ~ -~-~~-~~-~o o0000o ~ =.n ~' .~ m ° ate. ~ ~ ~ O N tU Q7 N ~ ~ y p~~~ 6.p' O ~ ~ (a N ~ .~. ~ ~ v SS7 .+ ~ ~'D ~~~~~ n ~ tD O (D (D p `z~ ~ n ~ 'D ~ '0 ~ ~ _ ~ N ' ~ ~ O 0 ' ~ ~ .__l ~ ~ ~ Q- Q7 ~ ~ ~ U rn 3 p µI ~ _ ~ ~ c ~ OJ 00 W W W W T ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ' O _ Q ~ " " ' ' ' ^' ~ n ~ ~ ~ 7~ ~ O ~ (D - TI T7 i1 Tl ~ 1 1l . ~ ° ~ a ~ -' Q ~ Q fl; ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > > > cn ~ , ~ ~ c n.Qaa.n.Q~ o ~ d O C~~ ~ ~ _ cn co cn ca cn cn O cOD 3 ~ ~ cn ~ ' ~ v -~ -« -~ -~ -~ -», ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ r' c v c~ '~ ~ ~ v ~ o ~. ~ _ o ~. o o r i m ~~ cn ~ ~ o ~ m N m fD ~ p_ cn ~ < °~ ~~ 01 Z7 p~ ~ = m C7 C O cn co ° N 0 ~ v cn c cu `~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ O ~ ~ (D ~, 3 ~ ill A O 3 N ~ ' ~ ~ < n i ~.N n> >'o ~'n D~~ ~ • ~ Q -o ~ -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° c D ~ cD `~ N !) Q Q Q 0~ 7~ N O . . p y v CC ~ ~ O ~ G'D O O ~ ~' W O (D ~ l~D C O ~ fD W v ~~ ~ ( D 7c' n _ (D = fD ~ Q ~ N (D ~ ~ ~' lD O ~ . N ~ O _. ~ O O V (fl C~ O ~ (D ~ O "O ~ ~' ~ Q cn n _ ~ ~ ~ ~ N CC C Q ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ lD ~ (D ~~ ~ ~ S O O ~ ~ .~ ~ (O ~ 70C O Q O ~ ,~ N n ~ ~! ~' O = ' O Q ~ ~' N ~1 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cQ ° c 3 o ~ ~ v ~ _. m ~ m ~ o' 'o ~ ~ a o ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ _ o w ~ D ~ v o. ~ ~ 3 00 ~ ~ m rn cn ~ c o m ~° Q. n w ~ ~' u' ~ 3 ~ ~ lJI ~ v ~< (D fD n N ~ v N ~ cD CD E!9 ~ {p {~ 69 Efl 4fl N O Ul ~' 00 N V p O ~ V ~ C71 ~ N ~1 O Ut CO V W ~ 00 r, c o cNn °o ° 0 a _ o 0 0 o c n ~ N ~ O _N O X 0 0 N B N N .r 00 O O N O _ ~ O 00 O O O O PALOMA DEL 50L SLURRY SEAL PROJECT FY 2007!08 thru 2008109 PROP 1B FUNDING STREET LENGTH PAVING AREA MILES GENERAL PLAN WIDTH STREET TYPE AMARITA WY 5,711.48 251,305.12 1.07 44 COLLECTOR CALA CARRASCO 1,357.49 54,299.60 0.26 40 LOCAL CALA GERONA 833.69 33,347.60 0.16 40 LOCAL CALA ROSSO 450.47 18,018.80 0.09 40 LOCAL CALATORRENTE 1,093.89 43,755.60 0.21 40 LOCAL CALLEAVELLA 527.04 21,081.60 0.10 40 LOCAL CALLS BALAREZA 2,118.69 84,747.60 0.40 40 LOCAL CALLE BALLENTINE 2,237.72 89,508.80 D.42 4D LOCAL CALLE BALMEZ 573.43 22,937.20 0.11 40 LOCAL CALLE BARCALDO 847.89 33,915.60 0.16 40 LOCAL CALLE CABALL05 1,127.95 45,118.00 0.21 40 LOCAL CALLS CARABANA 1,089.96 43,598.40 0.21 40 LOCAL CALLS CATALDO 479.12 19,164.80 D.09 40 LOCAL CALLS ESPINOSA 1,232.59 49,303.60 D.24 40 LOCAL CALLS ESPIRITO 204.61 8,184.40 0.04 40 LOCAL CALLS GALARZA 804.94 32,197.60 0.16 40 LOCAL CALLS JEMINEZ 777.51 31,100.40 0.15 40 LOCAL CALLS LONDE 693.43 27,737.20 D.13 40 LOCAL CALLS MARQUIS 88D.63 35,225.20 D.17 40 LOCAL CALLS MATARO 1,015.74 40,629.60 0.20 40 LOCAL CALLS NOVELDA 1,762.86 70,514.40 0.33 40 LOCAL CALLS REDONDELA 2,053.89 82,155.60 0.39 40 LOCAL CALLS RIVAS 582.96 25,650.24 0.11 44 COLLECTOR CALLS SANDOR 466.47 18,658.80 0.09 40 LOCAL CALLS VERONICA 519.30 20,772.00 0.10 40 LOCAL CALLS VIMIANZO 1,243.16 49,726.40 0.24 40 LOCAL CAMINOALAGON 1,132.45 48,954.56 0.22 40 LOCAL CAMINO CALIARI 1,307.38 52,295.20 0.25 40 LOCAL CAMINO CARUNA 1,495.94 59,837.60 0.29 40 LOCAL CAMINO CASILLAS 1,D03.91 40,156.40 0.19 4D LOCAL CAMINO GALLEG05 589.02 23,560.80 0.11 40 LOCAL CAMINO HERENCIA 1,402.28 56,091.20 D.27 40 LOCAL CAMINO MOLNAR 810.36 32,414.40 0.15 40 LOCAL CAMINO RABAGO 1,196.30 47,852.00 0.22 40 LOCAL CORTE ABANILLA 566.80 22,672.00 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE ALBANO 616.71 24,668.40 0.12 40 LOCAL CORTE ALGETE 995.00 39,800.00 D.20 40 LOCAL CORTEALMERIA 2,013.58 8D,543.20 D.37 40 LOCAL CORTE ALMONTE 1,418.80 56,752.00 0.27 40 LOCAL CORTE AMAYA 447.09 17,883.60 0.08 40 LOCAL CORTEARGENTO 1,132.14 45,285.60 0.21 40 LOCAL CORTE ASTORGA 462.77 18,510.80 D.09 40 LOCAL CORTEAVALINA 433.D1 17,320.40 D.08 40 LOCAL CORTE AVAL05 531.78 21,271.20 0.10 40 LOCAL CORTE AYALA 261.19 10,447.60 0.05 40 LOCAL CORTE BARBASTE 1,065.42 42,616.80 0.20 40 LOCAL CORTE BENAVENTE 1,310.48 52,419.20 0.24 40 LOCAL CORTE BENISA 254.74 1D,189.60 0.05 40 LOCAL CORTE BENITEZ 426.71 17,068.40 0.08 4D LOCAL CORTE CABELLO 412.09 16,483.60 D.08 40 LOCAL CORTE CABRAL 458.87 18,354.80 0.09 40 LOCAL CORTECABRERA 1,786.70 71,468.00 0.33 40 LOCAL CORTECALANDA 790.81 31,632.40 0.15 40 LOCAL CORTE CARDENAS 513.93 20,557.20 0.10 4D LOCAL CORTE CARDIN 314.10 12,564.00 0.06 40 LOCAL STREET LENGTH PAVING AREA MILES GENERAL PLAN WIDTH STREET TYPE CORTE CARDOZA 788.08 31,523.20 0.15 40 LOCAL CORTE CARMONA 1,328.16 53,126.40 0.25 40 LOCAL CORTE COLUCCI 243.63 9,745.20 0.05 40 LOCAL CORTE DAVILA 383.32 15,332.80 0.07 40 LOCAL CORTE DU RAZO 303.64 12,145.60 0.06 40 LOCAL CORTE ESCOBAR 594.87 23,794.80 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE ESPARZA 564.38 22,575.20 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE GARDANO 767.69 30,707.60 0.15 40 LOCAL CORTE ILLORA 862.85 34,514.00 0.16 40 LOCAL CORTE LANDERAS 373.42 0.00 0.07 0 NO CLASSIFICATION ASSIGNED CORTE LLAMAS 170.14 6,805.60 0.03 40 LOCAL CORTE LOGRONO 573.89 22,955.60 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE MONTILLA 554.90 22,196.00 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE POLLENSA 1,124.60 44,984.00 022 40 LOCAL CORTE PRIEGO 559.17 22,366.80 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE RIMOLA 759.36 30,374.40 0.14 40 LOCAL CORTE SAGUNTO 1,404.76 56,190.40 0.27 40 LOCAL CORTE SALAMANCA 948.22 37,928.80 0.18 40 LOCAL CORTE 51ER0 337.18 13,487.20 0.06 40 LOCAL CORTE SPARKMAN 557.99 22,319.60 0.11 40 LOCAL CORTE TOLOSA 669.38 26,775.20 0.13 40 LOCAL CORTE UTNEHMER 476.24 19,049.60 0.09 40 LOCAL CORTE VILLENA 300.87 12,034.80 0.06 40 LOCAL LEENA WY 1,507.65 66,336.60 0.29 44 COLLECTOR MCCABE DR 1,914.98 84,259.12 0.37 44 COLLECTOR MONTELEGRO WY 3,848.53 169,335.32 0.73 44 COLLECTOR PIO PICO RD 1,351.09 59,447.96 0.26 44 COLLECTOR SANTIAGO RD 1,196.76 93,347.28 0.22 78 MAJOR ARTERIAL VIA ALCORISA 495.7$ 19,831.20 0.09 40 LOCAL VIAALHAMA 1,108.52 44,340.80 0.21 40 LOCAL VIA ALLRIZO 250.01 11,000.44 0.05 44 COLLECTOR VIA ALORA 214.46 8,578.40 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA ARIAS 616.71 24,668.40 0.12 40 LOCAL VIA ARNEDO 268.31 10,732.40 0.05 40 LOGAI VIA BANDE 622.52 24,900.80 0.12 40 LOCAL VIA BARRAZA 736.46 29,458.40 0.14 40 LOCAL VIA BARROZO 870.06 34,802.40 0.17 40 LOCAL VIA BEJARANO 796.11 31,844.40 0.16 40 LOCAL VIA BONILLA 886.79 35,471.60 0.17 40 LOGAI VIA CALL 181.44 7,257.60 0.03 40 LOCAL VIA CAMPANARIO 1,253.94 50,157.60 0.24 40 LOCAL VIA CANDELEDA 845.01 33,800.40 0.16 40 LOCAL VIA CARO 276.86 11,074.40 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA CAVALO 296.38 11,855.20 0.06 40 LOCAL VIA CEJA 184.15 7,366.00 0.03 40 LOCAL VIA CERDA 205.89 8,235.60 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA CESARIO 704.39 28,175.60 0.13 40 LOCAL VIA CIRILLO 287.86 11,514.40 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA CORDARO 260.68 10,427.20 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA DEANDA 218.33 8,733.20 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA DENZO 196.26 7,850.40 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA FLORE 422.26 16,890.40 0.08 40 LOCAL VIA GANDIA 428.54 17,141.60 0.08 40 LOCAL VIA GUERRO 209.64 8,385.60 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA JASSO 215.92 8,636.80 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA JUMILLA 806.14 32,245.60 0.15 40 LOCAL VIA MEJIA 181.17 7,246.80 0.03 40 LOCAL VIA MONTALBAN 703.88 28,155.20 0.13 40 LOCAL VIA NANZO 287.98 11,519.20 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA NAYA 190.39 7,615.60 0.04 40 LOCAL STREET LENGTH PAVING AREA MILES GENERAL PLAN WIDTH STREET TYPE VIA POLA 184.46 8,116.24 0.03 44 COLLECTOR VIA RAMI 904.74 39,012.08 0.17 44 COLLECTOR VIA RAMOS 286.43 11,457.20 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA RAYA 183.97 7,358.80 0.03 40 LOCAL VIA RAZO 186.55 7,462.00 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA RICCI 247.65 9,906.00 0.05 40 LOCAL VIA RIVAS 181.55 7,262.00 0.03 40 LOCAL VIA ROJAS 491.39 19,655.60 0.10 40 LOCAL VIA SAJO 185.04 7,401.60 0.04 40 LOCAL VIA TAFALLA 910.65 36,426.00 0.17 40 LOCAL VIA TAMARITE 227.34 10,002.96 0.04 44 COLLECTOR VIA VELIS 182.99 8,051.56 0.03 44 COLLECTOR 99,698.62 4,088,009.88 18.93 ITEM NC). 15 RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL MAP AND SUBDIVIDING PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 AND 20 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE TOWN OF TEMECULA IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council does hereby find determine and declare that: A. Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code authorizes the City Council to direct the City Engineer to cause to have an Official Map prepared of portions of the City; B. The City Engineer has been directed by the City Council to • have an Official Map prepared pursuant to said Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code; C. Under the direction of the City Engineer, a field survey was done and an Official Map prepared by William L. Green, a licensed surveyor, number LS 4547; D. The City of Temecula owns portions of land in fee in Blocks 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 and 20 as shown on the map of the Town of Temecula in Book 15, Page 726 Records of San Diego County, California; 1=; Said Qfficial Map establishes "parceis of land owried by the ' City of Temecula in fee; F. Said Official Map establishes new rights-of-way for the reconfiguration of Main Street into a new "U" shaped alignment as set forth in the attached Official Map; G. Said Official Map abandons a portion of the Main Street midway between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street towards the east, ending at Interstate 15 (the California Department of Transportation's ("Caltrans") right-of-way); H. Said Official Map abandons a portion of Third Street, east of • Mercedes Street; and I. Said Official Map abandons the rights to the easement, • identified as Easement "A" on the attached Official Map, which was reserved for any public utilities within the abandoned portions of Main Street as vacated by a document recorded April 23, 1975 as Instrument No. 46494 of Official Records; J. Said Official Map abandons the rights of easement, identified as Easement Note "B" on the attached Official Map, which was reserved for any public utilities within the abandoned portions of an alley in Block 20 as vacated by a document recorded February 22, 1980 as Instrument No. 35285 of Official Records; K. Said Official Map abandons the rights of easement, identified as Easement Note "E" on the attached Official Map, which was reserved for any public utilities within >;he abandoned portions of an alley as vacated by a document recorded April 23, 1979 as Instrument No. 80863 of Official Records; L. Said Official Map abandons the rights of easement, identified as Easement Note "F" on the attached Official Map, which was reserved for any public utilities within the abandoned portions of Second Street as vacated by a document recorded July 16, 1984 as Instrument No. 153463 of Official Records; M. Said Official Map abandons the rights of easement, identified as Easement Note "G" on the attached Official Map, which was reserved for any public utilities within the abandoned portions of an Mercedes Street as vacated by a document recorded May 20, 1980 as Instrument No. 94502 of Official Records; and • N. Said Official Map consolidates multiple smaller blocks to create seven (7) larger parcels. Section 2. Approval of Official Map. The City Council hereby approves, adopts and certifies the map consisting of three (3) sheets attached hereto as the Official Map in accordance with the provisions of Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code for the uses and purposes therein named. Section 3. Dedication.to Public. The City of Temecula hereby.dedicates..to 'the public for use Lot A (Mercedes Street) and Lot B (Main'Street) as•shown on this map that is approved and adopted as an Official Map. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is hereby directed to certify to the adoption of this Resolution attested by the official seal of the City of Temecula. • PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26`h day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, Council Member Ron Roberts, Council Member ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Chuck Washington, Council Member STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08-_ was duly and regularly adopted, and signed by a majority of the members of the City Council of the City of Temecula and the Mayor as presiding officer of said body at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Official Map, Old Town Civic Center Properties PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL MAP AND SUBDIVIDING PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 AND 20 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE TOWN OF TEMECULA IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BACKGROUND: On June 27, 2006, the City Council approved the master plan for Phase 1 of the Old Town Civic Center, which among other things includes the construction of the Town Square and the Mercedes and Main Street Improvements within the area of the proposed Civic Center. On April 10, 2007 the City Council approved the master plan for Phase 2 of the Old Town Civic Center. The area encompassing all phases of the Old Town Civic Center project consists of previously dedicated right-of-way and several smaller parcels. All but three of the parcels, which were acquired by the Redevelopment Agency (RDA), were acquired by the City. To facilitate consolidating the parcels and dedicating new right-of-way it was necessary to transfer title from the RDA to the City so that the City owns all affected parcels. This was accomplished on February 12, 2008. After the Official Map is approved, with larger parcels and new right-of-way dedicated, the City will transfer an equivalent amount of property back to the RDA. The Official Map will merge the numerous parcels into 7 numbered parcels that match the layout of Civic Center's master plans as mare particularly described below. The attached Official Map is a compilation of several maps, as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act, establishing the parcels currently all owned by the City for the Civic Center and related infrastructure. The Official Map creates 7 new numbered parcels as follows: 1 forthe Civic Center, 1 forthe parking structure, 1 far the Town Square and 4 for the Main Street retail areas. In addition to the 7 numbered parcels, the Official Map vacates portions previously dedicated right-of-way for Main and Third Streets and creates 2 lettered parcels reserved far public use far street and public utility purposes {the new alignment of Main Street). As discussed previously, after approval and recordation of the Official Map, future Council and RDA Board actions will be prepared to convey the 4 new parcels that make up the Main Street retail area back to the RDA. FISCAL IMPACT: Otherthan minor recordation fees, there is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of the Official Map. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Official Map 2. Resolution No. 08- RESOLUTION NO. Q8- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL MAP AND SUBDIVIDING PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 AND 20 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE TOWN OF TEMECULA IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council does hereby find determine and declare that: A. Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code authorizes the City Council to direct the City Engineer to cause to have an Official Map prepared of portions of the City; B. The City Engineer has been directed by the City Council to have an Official Map prepared pursuant to said Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code; C. Under the direction of the City Engineer, a field survey was done and an Official Map prepared by William L. Green, a licensed surveyor, number L S 4547; D. The City of Temecula owns portions of land in fee in Blacks 4, 5, 6, 7, 19 and 20 as shown on the map of the Town of Temecula in Book 15, Page 726 Records of San Diego County, California; E. Said Official Map establishes parcels of land owned by the City of Temecula in fee; F. Said Official Map establishes new rights-of-way for the reconfiguration of Main Street into a new "U" shaped alignment as set forth in the attached Official Map; G. Said Official Map abandons a portion of the Main Street midway between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street towards the east, ending at Interstate 15 (the California Department of Transportation's ("Caltrans") right-of--way}; H. Said Official Map abandons a portion of Third Street, east of Mercedes Street; and I. Said Official Map consolidates multiple smaller blacks to create seven (7} larger parcels. Section 2. Approval of Official Map. The City Council hereby approves, adopts and certifies the map consisting of three (3} sheets attached hereto as the official Map in accordance with the provisions of Division 3 of Title 7 of the California Government Code for the uses and purposes therein named. Section 3. Dedication to Public. The City of Temecula hereby dedicates to the public for use Lot A (Mercedes Street} and Lot B (Main Street} as shown on this map that is approved and adapted as an official Map. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is hereby directed to certify to the adoption of this Resolution attested by the official seal of the City of Temecula. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26t" day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Comerchero, Council Member Ron Roberts, Council Member ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Chuck Washington, Council Member [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Janes, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Na. 08-_ was duly and regularl~ adapted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held an the 26" day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Janes, MMC City Clerk eo/x[/z p ~~ Bs~3 wSN^ ~ ~~be _ _g~ ~~a ~ w ~ m~ ~ ~ <tlm z ~ ~: i g S vW=i ~ ~~ _ ~ Cw ~~~_ ~S~g 5 ~F~~ ~m~ U~ V~ ~~. ~~~~ j~. a ~~~ `fin ~. ~ ~$~ w -``° _~ N seem - ~~~ ~ e _~~ .~~ ( ° a.;~g~g~m ~~ ~~~ ~ ~m ~ Gag ~ s ~~ ~ g ~~ 3.w~ ~~w¢ ~g his ~_ ~~ ~' € a '- ~< ~ 5~s~ ags~ 5c ~~°~ ~'~ ~s~ ~~ 5g 5g Ida ~e ~ ~a `~ ~ a ~ o ~? ~~C~ =~ ~g a~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z s g e~ ~ eff°~ e~m~ Q °$ ~~~a ~ 6 ~~ ~~ a s~ ~~, ~ ~~,~ ~xa~ ~=wa `^ aag g ° ~= d~ ~~ ~ c, a~ ~a~ ~s~- safe ~ff o ~ E^~: ~ as o° o s°g" p3~~ ~~p amp ~ ~ ~ ~ ° 5 ~:g m m< m a ~<.a U (__) g" ~g~y ~ ~~a ~~ Via= ~~ ~-~ ~=~ ~_~ ~__^ F 3~ ~o~= 3 m k ~¢8 ~~° oz o€8 0' G q_8`d °g_<.o~~ o LL sa ~~= ~ ~~ 's~~ ~~_ ~LL~ ~~~ a- ~`~ o~~N a~ s=~`~ a 5a~ s s r O So .X aBff ~k .~~ .jS .'aJ ^ w~ ~~ ,; ~~ .tl .d~Bj ~~~`~V x~. <~ ~~~~ ~ e~~ ~~~ mks °~ °°~ ~ °~~ ~.~ ~ 's°- sa's °~~ F ~€ z s~ ff ~ es a&~~~~ ~ ~~~_ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a use' ~ ; ;o `'> z ' ~_G 3 `° 3 as of °~~€~S_ ' ~Sh~s o n~ ,°, mg& = =~= ~k~ ,mss'' ~ <c, ~~ a~^~- as N1LG3W' W UN Z ~~'me gL1'q°-• ,~W, '6 ~~E~~~g N33~~~ ~~ um OC 11 94/ZZ/Z OM3tl4Wtl '1N4 Z00X090tt\9xiaavw\44v9\995~O~Si\vitlOtl\~r N W ~ ~ k j ~= `~ ~~§~ ~ .fib ~~ eh~~ ~~ F~3 ~a 4~P ~a~ ~~k9~ ~~ ~n :~~ d ~~ k'~~ z ~Qdm ~~ oE~ 3g ~"~ 4~b a~~ a G~ #~ a~ ~` o ak~4w' E ~°g ~k ~k ~o a o ~~ ~^~~ ~~~ w~ a~~ < ~ o ~~ N a s; ~ s a= a= ~~ ~s ~ ~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _~ B ~~ ~~ E~ ~e $~ ~~ ~s N a Qo ~m Sw 5~ g~ ~a ~a- ~r N nk $ i a ~ °m : S 58 5 ~ ~d k~ J~ 58 5~ ~ 6' -n _ w Sm~ Sn & . S ~ 58~ S<d 0 w ~ k~ ~ ~~~ ~~3 s ~5 6B~ E.k ~~8 ~~ w ~~s ~-~ ~ ~~ ~s5 ~~~ ~~~ r Q ~s w ~`~s ~~~ ~ s~ s~~ s~~ ~ w ~~ O O O O O O O a -~ o .~ _ ~ ~~~~~~ G ~ o~ ~~~ ~ ~~ s~T~ ~~ ~~ a e e e m rc ~_ - S ~ Ag 8 74 9~ 6Y : b , b '° mm ~~~h5~e~~~~^o ~~g: ~~ p o~q~8~~ g~~ ~~ ~JJ~ -a -aka ~'" ~~~: ~~ ~ ~~~p~~ ~ w~~<$ ~. 4 „s ~~ - ~ ~'-¢ ~o~ODO©OO O ~ O ® © ®as ®a~0a©808.©-. N _paa~8 we eL.~ av=vL o.3W.d ~9~WnoW:n6.Iaabn~W.~18o9~o«n,..aa1„ N W M 0 w N Q ~ yW. .4-, F E U ~~ 0 n ~ I__L ~~ ~ ~ «$ N o ~ ao ^a „~ ~ ~^ ~(1ad U u~ j H S~ ~ ~ ~ qxq 4 ~ '6_ 5 a O ~~ U ~S F ~i Z g3 ~Z 4g 3 ~~ ~~ d4 ~` W CL CA O V a t L I sp I ~. m~p~l a ~ WTI ~~^ ?RA R - ~'s l ~ ~ ° i 2WI ~~€ I °~' o Y I y' $$ ITdll$ ,[6'696 3.I1,62,66N ~_ ~~ _ _ _ I tg~ (Itl ,46'694 3.[Z,6E.IHl~ - g„ ~ i (Stl ,f6'694 3,YI,6Z,bbN) $p = $8S '3t~ $=$2 ~~~I WR;,~ I ~~~' I SIC ~)~ (SN .99'696 3.iZ,BL,46N) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ({Y ,Bd'694 3.lS.LZ.10N) _ _ .ffi'694 3.0].LZ.btN "I ~I ~a I _I I-_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __ _ g _ 1~3tl15 OJOJ35 _ _ _~. 1 (lN 64 OLY 3.SL. R.~.C9 O[ OL.6[.W - A ^~~- I I - I I - - _W~ e h 8~,^sABA-d'.IA nAF83RB35iC 8828a3'A811 - ~ R'~°R8$88'$$$$RRm$^=WRB=-WCR~ 11o~ A~ a I I gglgllllggl ;g; Igl llllll~gggg ggll °I ~~ • ~ Lo~ _ 9 < ~R~BA°3A~^RA$A6~p8~A58 ~~R8,n`,°-8~~ F r'-I- 3 ~:m8R~t7R FRy'~y8~~?R$RWW RC8;F::SA `A ~ ~S I I ~ ~-I~~I ii-Ii. '~~~€Ii'~ es. 's ~R a I I ~~ ° amt ._ I^Im - ^•^°^ _______ema~aaa.$an WR R I^I_ ~ I I I e e l I I R ~ L~_ y1 ~ a R 133N15 3W IH1 _ _ ~tl :xroTb ,',aT.erar-W.nx _ _ _ A r~- ~~~ ~x p _' I I q~ ~ ~ ~.r I ' 3 b w G ~,~ I R R8 i ~~ ,~ C' `Ig3 °a- I g~ ~ I~I~lolal ml ~- ~~& ~` el ~~mY 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~w g ~. ~ I hl<I~+I~. V I I I ~ "gm~ _ 1_I_L~~ L1_I_L~_ ' _ .L1'OCL 3-KyfiL.NN _ _I _ _ NW'WL LI'Wi __ L___ .a .i9 moy~m In°~I NIA o to W'ou)..4za ~L 3.vs.ev.6w ~ I Ne8 ©^_ h Im~l^SS`f = J~ Igg I ~ I a vale I I al ~I~$ YSNI R~148a I ~ I ^„I. ~ ~~ I 0111 _ .5a ~ W 3 N ~ ~' tl& I .8 -_ `-_-- ~--- e ~ o - -~- _----- _ Q Il'4Lt 3_Po.6LM g ® -o- ` ~~ 133N15 NIYN - ''I"'I-----~~~~~~ 414 ~ 'BLi 3.W.Y.11X R ~ OI al IN IIO W!/la =m liV ~~ ~~~ I ~RI~7~ gg Y35 I ~$ ® ell ~I,dl~,9~ I I ~~'~ I ~ ~ 4 i .h 6. '- m l I SFm I~=1YO r' 6s 'qm3 ail I I ~I °I~ Id I mL I = --I ~i N' 69Y1 S[ M o i_A3llb ,L6'64L 0 W'91S 3116Z,MN1m a r _ _ 10'OH_ 3 l! 6Ly>N ~ ~N NI NI N NI.N Imo, I.~ I MI ~W I^ Im fql ol_NI~ Iel ~ a l I I I I I I I I I 'FI~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I . Y oN ~s~ge ~ si I ~~ R ~k~~~ R _ ^r__ " I 3 ai^ r T 4V I I I I I^° "'I"I PI I I agy I ~ I W I hl I _I I Pp ;~~~~ _ aB RI ~ I^I I~ I ~ ~ I I I I ml n. ~^ ~ y~ m~ W M h h'! ~ O (~~ I I~~I I I ml I ~L ~ Ia-I I I _L1J-L_ fi Q A ° -1-T Iso f'-l-r' I I I I of I I I I I I ~I I I I I I ICI ,~INI_ °~ ^ I '° I '^ I'~I I I I I I I ~I I I ~ I~ ml I I i 8 ~ ~ ~ m _ ~ ~ k~=1 t9 =k~- ~ ~ I I IY I l I I I I I I l I I I g m w W I I I I I ~I I I ~ ~ I~I~I~I~I~llml^11 ~'~'~ ~ ~ MI I I I I of I I ~ I I I I ~I I I ~ aL-t~ I-t~-tf a R 0. ` 7 T F$- --~ J~ ~~-~~ ~ I I I I I~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I I „ I ~ I I I I f I I a' O m W I I ^ m m o ~' ~ " ~° I I l ' I I I I I I. I~ I I I ° -I I I W I ~m I I I ~ I I I I I I I-I w~sz - g °1 - __ - ITEM NC). 16 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with AEI-CASC Engineering for Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Plan Check and Business Inspection Services PREPARED BY: Aldo Licitra, Associate Engineer/NPDES Daniel A. York, Deputy Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with AEI-CASC Engineering in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Plan Check and Business Inspection Services, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment to the Agreement. BACKGROUND: On July 16, 2007, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with AEI-CASC Engineering in the amount of $30,000.00 for Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) plan check and Business Inspection Services for Fiscal Year2007-08. The NPDES Program requires the use of a specialized consultant as-needed to: 1) Augment staffing when balancing peaks in development submittals and maintaining prompt review comment turn-arounds, and 2) Conduct specialized business inspections required by the NPDES permit. To date, the amount of the original agreement is nearly expended. Staff has determined that additional funds are necessary to augment these services through the end of the current Fiscal Year 2007-08. The First Amendment provides for the cost of these additional services in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00. With this Amendment, the total agreement amount with AEI-CASC Engineering is $60,000.00. All other terms of the Agreement remain the same. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the original Agreement with AEI-CASC Engineering is $30,000.00. This First Amendment to the Agreement provides for an additional amount not to exceed $30,000.00, for a total Agreement amount of $60,000.00. Adequate funds are available within the NPDES operating budget to support the recommended action. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AEI-CASC ENGINEERING FO R WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN {WQMP} PLANCHECK AND BUSINESS INSPECTION SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of February 13, 2008 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"} and AEI-CASC Engineering ("Consultant"}. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On July 16 2007, the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for Water Quality Control Plan (VIlQMP) Plancheck and Business Inspection Services ("Agreement"} in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents {$30,000.00). B. The parties desire to increase the payment for additional consultant services in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000.00) through the term of the Agreement. 2. Section 5(a). PAYMENT of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 5(a). PAYMENT: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms for services described in the Original Agreement dated July 16, 20Q7. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000.00) for Fiscal Year 2Q07-2008 for a total contract amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($60,000.00) unless a higher amount is approved by the City Council by amendment to this Agreement. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full farce and effect. C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converter\femp\871441.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT AEI-CASC Engineering 937 S. Via Lata, Suite 500 Colton, CA 92324 (909) 783-0101 Richard J. Sidor, Principal 2 C:1Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converter\femp\871441.doc ITEM NC). 17 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Lagoon Investigation Order -Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Watershed Permittees PREPARED BY: Aldo Licitra, Associate Engineer/NPDES Daniel A. York, Deputy Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: ThattheCity Council approve the Memorandum ofAgreementwith the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation and authorize the Mayorto execute the agreement on behalf of the City for the amount of $59,322.00. BACKGROUND: On July 19, 2006, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) issued a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Lagoon Investigation Order (Order) to stakeholders (permittees) in the Santa Margarita River (SMR) Watershed. The permittees listed on the Order are Camp Pendleton, Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station, San Diego County, Riverside County Flood Control District, Caltrans, City of Murrieta, and City of Temecula. The Order proposes to establish numeric limits, called Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), for critical pollutants causing water quality impairments to the SMR lagoon near Camp Pendleton. TMDLs represent the maximum amount of any given pollutant that can be released into a receiving water. The State Water Code, Section 13267, grants authority to the Board to require a discharger to furnish technical or monitoring reports. The data collected from the technical investigation of the lagoon will be used to establish TMDLs for pollutants currently causing impairments to the lagoon. These TMDLs will subsequently be integrated into TMDL Orders starting in 2010. The effort associated with establishing the numeric limits costs $372,929. The Memorandum of Agreement establishes proportional shares each permittee contributes to the study. These contributions are based on each permittee's population, BenefitAssessment Unit count, and degree of hydrologic connectivity with the lagoon. The cost for the City of Temecula's share, based on the formula in the MOA, is $59,322.00. The MOA also describes the responsibilities of each permittee, identifies tasks, and lists costs associated with each task. FISCAL IMPACT: $59,322.00 has been budgeted in the NPDES Operating Budget to pay for Temecula's share associated with the requirements in the TMDL Investigation Order. ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Memorandum of Agreement far signature. Copy of Investigation Order. Copy of Cost Share Summary. Copy of Monitoring Casts. Copy of Required Tasks. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT N O. 08-M U-35-0005 BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND CITY OF TEMECULA AND CITY OF MURRIETA AND COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL WEAPONS STATION- FALLBROOK AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON This Memorandum of Agreement {MOA} for the Santa Margarita Lagoon Investigative Order Project (Lagoon Study) is made and entered into this day of by and among the City of Temecula, City of Murrieta, County of Riverside, County of San Diego, United States Department of the Navy -Naval Weapons Station- Fallbrook, United States Department of the Navy -Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, and the California Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "Partners", and The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, hereinafter referred to as "Reclamation", all of which are at times collectively referred to as "Parties." This agreement is made pursuant to: the Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902, {32 Stat. 388}, and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, all of which acts are commonly known and referred to as Reclamation Law; the Act of March 4, 1921, Public Law 66 - 389, The Sundry Civil Expenses Appropriations Act far 1922 (Popularly referred to as the Contributed Funds Act), (41 Stat.1404); and the "Act of June 30, 1932 ch. 314, sect. 601 {Economy Act}(47 Stat. 417}. -Interdepartmental Transfers, Section 686; and the Fiscal Year 2006 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 109-103 ;November 19, 2005. RECITALS WHEREAS, Santa Margarita Lagoon has been added to the State's list of impaired water bodies (303d list) for at least one of the following constituents: sediments, total dissolved solids, enteric bacteria, andlor nutrients; and WHEREAS, As a consequence of this listing, total maximum daily loads {TMDLs} must be developed for the critical constituents in each of the lagoons {Project}; and WHEREAS, the Parties received an Investigative Order, R9-2006-0076 (Order), from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWCB) regarding the Santa Margarita River Lagoon and Estuary (Lagoon); and WHEREAS, to comply, in part, with the Order, the Parties must develop and execute a scientifically valid water quality study of the Lagoon {Lagoon Study} within prescribed timelines; and WHEREAS, the Partners desire to share in the costs associated with the development and execution of the Lagoon Study as required by the Order; and WHEREAS, Reclamation has the authority to conduct the Lagoon Study pursuant to: the Act of Congress approved June 17, 1902, (32 Stat. 388}, and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, all of which acts are commonly known and referred to as Reclamation Law; the Act of March 4, 1921, Public Law 66 - 389, The Sundry Civil Expenses Appropriations Act for 1922 (Popularly referred to as the Contributed Funds Act}, (41 Stat.1404); and the "Act of June 30, 1932 ch. 314, sect. 601 (Economy Act)(47 Stat. 417}. -Interdepartmental Transfers, Section 686; and the Fiscal Year 2006 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 109-103 ;November 19, 2005; and WHEREAS, Reclamation has been requested by the Partners to coordinate and lead the effort identified in the Order; and WHEREAS, Reclamation, under the Contributed Funds Act, has the authority to receive funds from non-Federal Partners to fund their portion of the Lagoon Study; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Economy Act, 31 U.S.C. 1535, Reclamation, has the authority to receive funds from the Department of the Navy, to fund discrete and segregable portions of the Lagoon Study under pre-existing contract{s} that Reclamation holds for its own federal purposes/activities in the Santa Margarita River Basin; and such pre-existing contract{s} are for procurement of same or similar services as those that will be provided under an Economy Act Order, and WHEREAS, the Federal agencies identified in this MOA have determined that: the use of an Economy Act Order is in the best interest of the Government; services necessary for the Federal agencies to comply with the Investigative Order cannot be obtained as conveniently or economically by contracting directly with a private source; Department of the Navy unique terms and conditions, if applicable, will be included in the contract award; and funding is available and appropriate for the acquisition of services to undertake and complete the Lagoon Study, and 2 WHEREAS, Reclamation has funds available under the Southern California Investigations Program to assist in initiating and coordinating the Lagoon Study; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and which are incorporated into this MOA, the Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I PARTIES' GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES 1.0 Reclamation shall perform the fallowing functions: 1.1.0 Serve as the entity responsible far overall contract management and administration of consultant contracts for all work on the Lagoon Study. 1.1.1 Retain a consultant(s), satisfactory to the Partners, to perform the Lagoon Study. 1.1.2 Prepare quarterly progress reports of work performed by consultants in accordance with the project scheduled described in Article 5. 1.1.3 Schedule Executive Management Team Meetings at least quarterly and provide summary notes of Executive Management Team meetings within two weeks of the meeting date. 1.1.4 Submit quarterly data reports to the SDRWQCB on behalf of the Partners. 1.1.5 Upon execution of this MOA, Reclamation shall invoice each Party based on the shared costs identified in Article 4.0. ARTICLE II EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES 2.0 The Partners shall each designate a representative or designee to serve as a member of the Executive Management Team. 2.1 The Executive Management Team {EMT} shall perform the following: Participate in the oversight of the Lagoon Study, attend meetings and collaborate on developing strategies. ARTICLE III TERM OF AGREEMENT 3.0 This MOA shall commence on the date of the last signature of the Parties and shall terminate on April 1, 2009, unless modified, in writing, by all the Parties. _~ ARTICLE IV FUNDING 4.0 The cost of the Lagoon Study shall not exceed $372,929 and will be shared as follows by the Partners named in the Order: Cost Share Partner FY2008 FY2009 TOTAL Riverside Count $29,397 $14,228 $43,625 Temecula $40,246 $19,076 $59,322 Murrieta $47,684 $22,399 $70,083 Caltrans $10,783 $6,160 $16,943 San Die o Count $77,927 $54,847 $132,774 Cam Pendleton $21,892 $14,615 $36,507 Fallbrook Naval Station $8,656 $5,019 $13,675 Total $236,585 $136,343 $372,928 4.1 Each Partner shall provide their share of the Lagoon Study casts in accordance with Article 4 and subject to availability of funds as described in Article 4.2. 4.2 Each Party's obligation to make any payment under this MOA beyond the current fiscal year is contingent upon the availability of funding from which payment can be made. No legal liability on the part of any Party shall arise for payment beyond each Party's respective fiscal year unless funds are designated by that Party and are made available for payment of this MOA. 4.3 The Partners will reimburse Reclamation for overhead expenses associated with overall administration of consultant contracts, and submittal of required work products associated with the Order in the amount of $15,000. This administration cost has been built into the costs shown in Article 4.0. 4.4 In the event that any funds advanced to Reclamation by the Partners are not required to complete the work under this MOA, such excess funds shall be returned by Reclamation to the Partners without interest, within 60 days of completion of the scope of work. In the event the authorized representatives agree on additional work, such excess funds may be retained by Reclamation, consistent with the terms of this MOA. 4.5 ENCUMBANCE: By reason of constraints in California law and the California Constitution, Caltrans encumbers $16,943.00 as its portion of the shared cost and no further funding assumed under this Agreement unless this Article is amended by Caltrans to reflect a new enhanced funding limit. ARTICLE U COORDINATION. PROGRESS REPORTS. AND AUDITS 5.0 Reclamation shall submit to the EMT, a report of actual expenditures an Project activities at each "milestone" as determined by the EMT. 5.1 Reclamation shall maintain a separate account showing expended and available resources for all the work performed under this MOA, with costs identifiable by Project activity. These accounts and related records shall be available for inspection, audit, and reproduction by the Partners, without charge, during normal business hours. 5.2 Work performed under this MOA is also subject to examination and audit by the Federal Inspector General and each Partner for a period of three years after final payment of funds under this MOA. 5.3 As dictated by Federal Fiscal Law, Reclamation shall maintain separate accounts for all funds transferred by Naval Weapons Station-Fallbrook and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. ARTICLE VI AMENDMENTS 6.0 The Parties acknowledge that the schedule of activities and costs of conducting the Project are estimates based on an anticipated work product and that changes may occur due to changes in the physical dimensions of the monitoring order, the technical effort needed to complete the Project, the variability of the natural conditions, and the cost of the Lagoon Study tasks. Therefore, the Parties agree that if a change in the activities or costs described in this MOA, including Appendices, is necessary and feasible, the MOA may be modified, in writing, signed by all Parties. 6.1 In the event that an additional agency desires to participate in the Project, this MOA may be modified. The added Partner shall agree to the terms set forth in this MOA and shall have all rights as are conferred on the original Parties. Reclamation and the Partner(s) shall agree upon the terms of new membership including financial contributions unanimously. ARTICLE VII LIABILITY FOR INDEMNIFICATION 7.0 Reclamation shall perform its obligations under this MOA in the capacity of a Federal agency. Camp Pendleton and NWS Fallbrook shall perform their obligations under this MOA in their capacities as Federal agencies in accordance with federal law. The non-federal Partners shall perform their obligations under this Agreement in their respective capacities as public entities of the State of California. No Party is a co-venturer, agent, employee, or representative of any other Party. 7.1 Na Party assumes liability far claims or actions arising out of the performance of any work or actions or omissions, by any other Party, its agents, officers and employees. 7.2 Liability of the United States resulting from the negligence of its employees shall be governed by the Federal Tart Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671, et sec,.). The Parties recognize that the Federal Tort Claims Act operates to provide liability coverage for the United States Government and its employees in lieu of ordinary insurance coverage. 7.3 Each Party agrees to defend itself from any claim, action or proceeding arising out of the acts or omissions of itself and retain its own legal counsel, and bear its own defense costs. ARTICLE VIII FEDERAL AGENCY CONSIDERATIONS AND LIMITATIONS 8.Q The expenditure ar advance of any money ar the performance of any obligation created herein by any federal agency under this MOA shall be contingent upon timely appropriation or allotment of funds by Congress for an appropriate purpose. Interruption of federal funds as the result of Congressional action/inaction shall relieve the Federal agency Partners from any obligation under this Agreement until such time as funds became available. 8.1 Camp Pendleton and NWS Fallbrook are federal enclaves under the exclusive jurisdiction and control of the United States Department of the Navy (DoN). Both installations, as agencies of the federal government, may be subject to limitations in their abilities to comply with every provision stated herein in the same manner as the non-federal Partners. Both installations will endeavor, in goad faith, to satisfy all pertinent federal obligations created herein. ARTICLE IX TERMINATION 9.0 Any Party may terminate this MOA by giving written notice to the other Parties no less than 3Q days prior to the effective date of termination. Termination of this Agreement does not release any Party for obligations of the Investigative Order, nor does it release it from the financial obligations of this MOA. 6 ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.0 This MOA may be amended only by consent of all the Parties. No amendment shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the Parties. 10.1 This MOA shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and Federal law. If any provision or provisions shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. In addition, each Party agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be performed under the terms of this MOA. 10.2 No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver ar consent shall be in writing and signed by the Parties to have waived ar consented. Any consent by any Party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 10.3 The Parties agree to mediate any dispute prior to filing suit ar prosecuting suit against the other Parties. In the event suit is brought upon this MOA to enforce its terms, each Party shall be responsible far its awn attorneys' fees and costs. 10.4 This Agreement constitutes the entire MOA between the Parties with respect to the subject matter; all prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations, and undertakings are superseded hereby. 10.5 All information and data obtained or developed by Reclamation, in connection with development of the Lagoon Study activities (exclusive of intra- governmental communications} shall be available upon request, except where prohibited by law, to the Partners without further charge. However, use of said reports, data, and information shall appropriately reference Reclamation and the Partners as the source. 10.6 Data compiled, and the results of studies performed, under this MOA will became public domain upon the completion of the investigation and project report, or upon completion of a concluding report under the provisions of Article 11 herein. All deliverables shall include the Reclamation's Visual Identity logo information. 10.7 Na member of or delegate to Congress, ar resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this MOA, or to any benefits that may arise wherefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to extend to the MOA if made with a corporation for its general benefit. 10.8 This MOA may be executed in original counterparts that together shall constitute a single MOA. 10.9 The Reclamation contact person far this MOA is: Greg Krzys U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 27708 Jefferson Road, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92590 (951 } 695-5310 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REGION William Steele Date U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Southern California Area Office b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. CITY QF TEMECULA City Attorney Mayor City Clerk Date Date Date IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. City of Murrieta Date to IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. Chandra Wallar Date Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Land Use and Environment Group County of San Diego John Sansone Date County Counsel County of San Diego 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. County of Riverside Date 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. U.S. Dept of the Navy Date Naval Weapons Station, Fallbraok 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. Khalique Khan, Ph.D., P.E. Date Head, Environmental Engineering Division Assistant Chief of Staff Environmental Security Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton By direction of the Commanding C?fficer 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have executed this Agreement on the date and the year written above. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation Susanne Glasgow Date Deputy District Director -Environmental Division Monitoring costs will be funded through the Stormwater Program. These casts are included in the Needs Assessment, Santa Margarita Cost Share Agreement, and Memorandum of Agreement for monitoring. Costs for this work will be charged to District 43, EA 914244 15 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SAN DIEGO REGION INVESTIGATION ORDER NO. R9-2006-076 OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HALE AVENUE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY, AND NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCHARGE OF BACTERIA, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT, AND TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS INTO IMPAIRED LAGOONS, ADJACENT BEACHES, AND AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region {hereinafter San Diego Water Board) finds: 1. Condition of Impairment: The Clean Water Act {CWA) section 303{d) requires states to develop a list of waterbodies that do not or are not expected to meet water quality standards after implementing technology-based controls. The waterbodies in Table 1 have been listed by the State Water Resources Control Board as water quality limited segments for which Total Maximum Daily Loads {TMDLs} must be developed pursuant to section 303{d}. The purpose of a TMDL is to attain water quality objectives and restore the waterbodys beneficial uses. The eleven water quality limited segments are comprised of lagoons {in this Order "lagoons" refers to lagoons, sloughs, and creek mouths), adjacent beaches, and Agua Hedionda Creek. These waterbodies are impaired due to one or more of the following: indicator bacteria, nutrients, sediment/siltation, total dissolved solids {TDS}, and/or eutrophic conditions. In order to meet water quality objectives and restore beneficial uses the San Diego Water Board is initiating development of TMDLs to address these water quality limited segments. Table 1: List of Waterbodies addressed in TMDLs for Lagoons, Adjacent Beaches and Agua Hedionda Creek Hydrologic Descriptor Waterbody Water Quality Pollutant / Extent of Limited Segments Stressor Impairment 1 Lower Ysidora HSA (902.11) Santa Margarita Lagoon Entire lagoon Eutrophic 1 acres 2a Loma Alta HA (904.10) Loma Alta Slough Entire slough Eutrophic 8.2 acres 2b Entire slough Indicator Bacteria 8.2 acres 3 Lama Alta HA (904.10) Pacific Ocean Shoreline At Loma Alta creek mouth Indicator Bacteria 1.1 miles 4a EI Salto HSA (904.21) Buena Vista Lagoon Upper and lower Sedimentation / 202 acres portion of lagoon Siltation 4b Upper portion of Nutrients 150 acres lagoon 4c Upper and lower Indicator Bacteria 202 acres onion of la oon Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 Hydrologic Descriptor Waterbody Water Quality Pollutant / Extent of Limited Segments Stressor Impairment ~ Buena Vista Creek HA pacific Ocean Shoreline At Buena Vista Indicator Bacteria 1.2 miles {904.20} Creek 6a Los Monos HSA {904.31} Agua Hedionda Lagoon Upper and lower Sedimentation / 6 g acres oi•tion of la oon Siltation 6b Upper and lower Indicator Bacteria 6.8 acres ortion of la oon 7 Los Monos HSA {904.31) Agua Hedionda Creek Lower portion TDS 7 miles 8a San Elijo HSA {904.61 } San Elijo Lagoon Upper and lower ti f l Eutrophic 330 acres or on o a oon 8b Upper and lower Sedimentation / 150 acres portion of lagoon Siltation 8c Upper and lower Indicator Bacteria 150 acres onion of la oon ~ Escondido Creek HA {904.60) Pacific Ocean Shoreline At San Elijo Lagoon Indicator Bacteria 0.44 mile 10 Miramar Reservoir HA Las Penasquitos Lagoon Entire Lagoon Sedimentation / 469 acres {906.10) Siltation 11 Mission San Diego HSA Famosa Slough & Entire Lagoon Eutrophic 32 acres {907.11) Channel 2. Discharge of Waste: Sediment, nutrients, TDS, and bacteria enter these water quality limited segments from point and nonpoint sources. Point sources typically discharge at a specific location from pipes, outfalls, and conveyance channels from urban runoff discharges. Nonpoint sources are diffused sources that reach receiving waters from different routes of entry and originate from multiple land uses. Pollution from these sources tpoint and nonpoint) is discharged to the water quality limited segments through municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), which include State highways and military facilities. Other significant pollutant sources include a wastewater treatment plant and a dewatering operation that discharge into the water quality limited segments. 3. Persons Responsible for the Discharge: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)' and MS4 owners and operators in San Diego County,2 Riverside County3, Camp Pendleton and Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station (see Attachment 1) are responsible for these discharges. MS4 discharges from the non- military agencies are regulated under the terms and conditions of the Waste ' Order No. 99-06-DWO, NPDES No. CA (NPDES} Permit Statewide Storm Water California, Department of Transportation z Order No. R9-2001-0001, NPDES No C Urban Runoff from the Municipal Separa. County of San Dieao. the (ncornorated G Discharges of Urban Runoff from the of Riverside, the City of Murrieta, the Conservation District within the San ~ !Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for the State of Waste Discharge Requirements fnr Discharges of 'r System (MS4s) Draining the Watersheds of the ego County, and the San Diego Unified Port District. ' X766), `Waste Discharge Requirements for to Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Draining the County and the Riverside County Ftnod Cnntrnt and Water Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 Discharge Requirements in the orders listed in footnotes 1 through 3. Camp Pendleton and Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station are designated as small MS4s pursuant to Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ4 but have not yet been regulated by the San Diego Water Board under that order. The City of Escondido Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility Order No. 98-10}, regulated by NPDES requirements, discharges nutrients into the Escondido Creek. The North County Transit District is responsible for nutrient discharges to the Santa Margarita River from the dewatering of its Stuart Mesa Maintenance Facility. 4. Need for Monitoring Data: Water quality monitoring data are needed to develop TMDLs, and load and wasteload allocations and reductions for the water quality limited segments for each impairing pollutant. The San Diego Water Board intends to develop TMDLs, allocations, and reductions through modeling studies of the watersheds and lagoons. Hydrodynamic and water quality data for the lagoons, flow and water quality data for the major tributaries, and flow and water quality data for storm drains discharging directly into lagoons are needed to calibrate and verify the lagoon models, and to verify the watershed models in order to develop TMDLs and allocations. 5. Regulatory Authority and Necessity: Water Code section 13267 authorize the San Diego Water Board to require the submission of monitoring program reports from any person discharging pollutants into waters of the State. The monitoring data reports will allow the San Diego Water Board to assess the conditions of pollution due to sedimentation, nutrients, bacteria, and TDS contributing to impairment in the lagoons, adjacent beaches, and creek. These actions will result in the restoration and protection of water quality necessary to support the designated beneficial uses of these waterbodies. The costs to produce the monitoring program reports were estimated by the Dischargers to range between $300,000 to $500,000 per lagoon and up to $6.5 million region-wide, which included the cost of the special studies listed in Directive A8. The associated costs bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the actions, specifically the protection of water quality and beneficial uses. Water Code section 13383 authorizes the San Diego Water Board to establish monitoring and reporting requirements far discharges regulated under NPDES requirements. 6. California Environmental Quality Act: This action is an order to enforce the laws and regulations administered by the San Diego Water Board. As such, this action is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15308 of the California Public Resources Code. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Water Code section 13267 and 13383, that the Dischargers identified in Attachment 1 to this Order shall furnish the following reports 4 Order No. 20(13-0005-DWQ (State General Permit 1Vo. CAOOOOD4). "Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems'; Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 required by the San Diego Water Board in its investigation of the quality of waters of the State within the area of the discharge described in the above findings: A. MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTS A1. MONITORING PROGRAM WORKPLANS The Dischargers shall develop and submit to the San Diego Water Board no later than August 1, 2007, one Monitoring Program Workplan for each watershed containing one or more water quality limited segments, or one Monitoring Program Workplan for each water quality limited segment, as shown in Table 1. If, within 30 days after submittal of the workplans, no comments have been received from the San Diego Water Board, the Dischargers shall implement the Monitoring Program Workplans according to the schedules in the workplans. Workplans shall not be implemented until an adequate Quality Assurance Project Plan has been submitted to the San Diego Water Board as required in Directive A9 of this Order. The Workplans must be adequate to guide the collection of monitoring data needed to characterize dry weather flow and storm flow influenced water quality in the segments listed in Table 1 in order to complete development of TMDLs, and load and waste load allocations and reductions. The Workplan study design must address the following questions, or provide data necessary to calibrate/validate the computer models used to assist in answering the following questions: a} What are the concentrations of bacteria, nutrients, and/or sediment at the base of each watershed before it enters an impaired lagoon/dough/creek mouth, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303{d) list? What is the TDS concentration in Agua Hedionda Creek? b1 } What are the concentrations of bacteria, nutrients, and/or sediment in each impaired lagoonlslough/creek mouth, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303(d) list. Do they exceed Water Quality Objectives? b2} What are the dissolved oxygen concentrations in lagoons/sloughs/creek mouths impaired for nutrients/eutrophication? c} What are the total annual (and daily} mass loads of bacteria, nutrients, and/or sediment from each watershed to each impaired lagoon/slough/creek mouth, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303{d) list? What is the total annual {and daily} mass load of TDS to Agua Hedionda Creek? d} What are the measured values and fluctuations for the physical factors that contribute to the concentrations of impairing pollutant within each lagoon/slough/creek mouth, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303(d} list? Physical factors can include: condition of tidal channels (width, depth}, stream flow velocities and volumes, bathymetry, seasonality, light availability, temperature, rainfall, etc. Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 di) Under what inflow conditions (flow velocities, flow volumes} are the major loads deposited within each lagoon/slough/creek mouth, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303(d) list? d2) What percentage of the annual load from each constituent is deposited within the lagoons/sloughslcreek mouths, in accordance with the impairments specified in the 303(d) list, versus exiting the tidal channels? e} For waterbodies impaired by nutrients/eutrophication additional questions are required to model the nutrient dynamics of each system. These factors will affect not only the nutrient concentrations found in the water column, but also the response of plants/algae to these concentrations. e1 } What are the sediment flux rates for nutrients in these waterbodies? e2) What is the sediment oxygen demand in these waterbodies? e3} What are the standing crop totals and primary productivity rates for plant/macroalgae biomass in these waterbodies? f} What are the relative contributions for impairing pollutants(s} from each land use type or from regulated industrial/municipal facilities? g) What is the total annual load reduction of nutrients needed so that beneficial uses and water quality objectives associated with eutrophication/ low dissolved oxygen and nuisance algae growth are met? h1) What is the total annual load reduction of bacteria needed so that recreational beneficial uses and water quality objectives are met? h2) What is the total annual load reduction of sediment needed so that sedimentation/siltation is reduced to meet water quality objectives and to prevent lagoon mouth closings, loss of lagoon depth, and loss of important habitats? h3} What is the total annual load reduction of TDS needed in Agua Hedionda Creek so that water quality objectives that support the MUN beneficial uses are met? Lagoonslwatersheds shall be monitored far the constituents that correspond to the pollutants/stressors indicated far the segments listed in Table 1. A2. IN SITU DATA COLLECTION (FIELD MEASUREMENTS} The Monitoring Program Workplan shall include, at a minimum, the constituents, sampling locations, and frequency and duration of sampling as indicated below for water temperature, specific conductivity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and flow velocity measurements needed to calibrate and verify the models to be used to calculate TMDLs in the water quality limited segments. Site-specific changes to this Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 sampling specification may be proposed to the San Diego Water Board along with the scientific rationale for the changes. Any proposed changes may not be implemented until incorporated into this Order by amendment. Hourly field measurements are required to document the influence of tides andlor daily fluctuations of dissolved oxygen. The daily fluctuations of dissolved oxygen are amplified in waterbodies with nutrient/ eutrophic impairments. All the lagoons listed in this Order are subject to tidal influence and/or impaired for nutrients/eutraphication {which can lead to low dissolved oxygen concentrations}. Therefore all lagoons, sloughs, creek mouths must have the following data collected: i. Constituents ^ Specific conductivity ^ Water temperature ^ Surface water depth {if no bathymetry data exist} ^ Velocity {optional} ^ Dissolved oxygen {DO) and pH {only required in lagoons impaired for eutrophic conditions/nutrients) ii. Location A minimum of one sample site in each segment or portion of a segment shall be selected. The sampling site shall represent ambient water conditions and shall not be influenced by storm drains or other effluent discharges. iii. Frequency/Duration Two two-week periods5 of hourly monitoring for the constituents listed above. One two-week period shall be selected between October 1, 2007, through April 30, 2008 and another two-week period between May 1, 2008, through September 30, 2008. A3. WATERSHED POLLUTAGRAPHS AND LAGOON WATER QUALITY (STORM EVENT} The Monitoring Program Workplan shall include, at a minimum, the constituents, sampling locations, and frequency and duration of sampling as indicated below for generation of two separate storm pollutagraphs. When planning for monitoring, forecasted storm events of 0.2 or more inches of rainfall should be considered. Site-specific changes to this sampling specification may be proposed to the San Diego Water Board along with the scientific rationale for the changes. Any proposed changes may not be implemented until incorporated into this Order by amendment. When water depth is sufficient to submerge a probe to collect the measurement, field measurements of water temperature, pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen shall be collected when water quality samples listed below are collected. $ The two-week sampling periods shall be during the same time for all sections (A2, A3, and A4} monitoring. Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 i. Constituents Waters impaired due to Indicator Bacteria (Loma Alta Slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon} ^ Fecal coliform ^ Total coliform ^ En~erococcus ^ Flow rate Waters impaired due to SedimentationlSiltation (Buena vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, Las Penasquitos Lagoon} ^ Total Suspended Solids ^ Turbidity ^ Flow rate Waters impaired due to TDS {Agua Hedionda Creek} ^ Total dissolved solids ^ Flow rate Waters impaired due to Eutrophic ConditionlNutrients (santa Margarita Lagoon, Loma Alta Slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, Famosa Slough and Channel} ^ Total nitrogen ^ Total phosphorus ^ Flow rate ii. Location Watersheds: A minimum of one sample site shall be selected in the main tributary to the water quality limited segment, upstream of the tidal prism. The sampling site shall represent ambient water conditions and shall not be directly influenced by storm drains or other effluent discharges. If tributary has an established mass loading station, this site should be used for the pollutagraph monitoring. Lagoons: A minimum of one sample site in each lagoon segment or portion of a segment shall be selected. The sampling site shall represent ambient water conditions and shall not be influenced by storm drain flow or other effluent discharges. iii. Frequency/Duration Watersheds: Hourly grab samples shall be collected during the storm event. From those hourly samples collected, a minimum of eight grab samples representative of the storm event shall be analyzed. Any remaining samples may be disposed. The samples shall be collected to Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 represent at least the first flush and peak flow to the extent that is practicable. At a minimum, sampling shall occur during two storm events, between October 1, 2007 and April 30, 2008. Sampling of at least one early season storm is preferred. Lagoons: A minimum of one grab sample shall be collected in each lagoon segment during each storm event corresponding to the storm events described above for Watershed FrequencylDuration in this section. Samples should be collected as close to the peak flow of the storm event as practicable. A4. WATERSHED MODEL (DRY WEATHER} The Monitoring Program Workplans shall include a study to conduct aone-day survey during each two-week period of hourly sensor data collection to measure the flaw rate and water quality of all storm drain discharges of visible flow into a lagoon. At a minimum, the constituents, sampling locations, and frequency and duration of sampling as indicated below for the pollutants impairing a water quality limited segment shall be included in the Workplan. Site-specific changes to this sampling specification may be proposed to the San Diego Water Board along with the scientific rationale for the changes. Any proposed changes may not be implemented until incorporated into this Order by amendment. i. Constituents When water depth is sufficient to submerge a probe to collect a measurement, field measurements of water temperature, pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen shall be collected when water quality samples listed below are collected. If water depths in the lagoon/sloughlcreek mouth are sufficient to collect field measurements, but not at the storm drain autfall, then a measurement may be collected in the lagoon/slough/creek mouth near the storm drain. Waters impaired due to Indicator Bacteria {Lama Alta slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon) ^ Fecal coliform ^ Total coliform ^ Eni`et~acoccus ^ Flow rate Waters impaired due to Eutrophic Conditions/ Nutrients (Santa Margarita Lagoon, Loma Alta Slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, Famasa Slough and Channel) ^ Ammonia ^ Total kjeldahl nitrogen ^ Nitrite as N ^ Nitrate as N Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 ^ Total nitrogen ^ Ortho phosphate as P ^ Total phosphorus ^ Chlorophyll a • Biochemical oxygen demand {BODS} ^ Flow rate ii. Location All storm drain flow, as it exits the outfall, discharging within the confines of each lagoon or estuary. iii. Frequency/Duration Time-composite samples shall be collected once during the two-week period of hourly sensor data collection from all storm drain outfalls with visible flow that directly discharge into a lagoon. A time composite sample consists of a sample collected every 15 minutes at the same location {at 0 min., 15 min. and 30 min.}. These three samples are then composited into one sample to take to the lab for analysis. A5. LAGOON AND TRIBUTARY WATER QUALITY MONITORING FOR TWO- WEEK PERIODS. The Monitoring Program Workplans shall include at a minimum the constituents, sampling locations, and frequency and duration of sampling as indicated below far the pollutants impairing a water quality limited segment. Site-specific changes to this sampling specification may be proposed to the San Diego Water Board along with the scientific rationale for the changes. Any proposed changes may not be implemented until incorporated into this Order by amendment. i. Constituents Field measurements of water temperature, pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen shall be collected when water quality samples listed below are collected. Waters impaired due to Indicator Bacteria {Lorna Aita slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon) ^ Fecal coliform ^ Total coliform ^ Er~terococcus ^ Tributary flow rate Waters impaired due to Sedimentl5iltation (Buena vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Creek, San Elijo Lagoon, Los Penasquitos Lagoon) • Turbidity • Total Suspended Solids • Tributary flow rate Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 Waters impaired due to TDS (Aqua Hedionda Creek} Total dissolved solids ^ Tributary flow rate Waters impaired due to Eutrophic Conditions/Nutrients (santa Margarita Lagoon, Loma Alta Slough, Buena Vista Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, Famosa Slough and Channel} ^ Ammonia as N ^ Total kjeldahl nitrogen ^ Nitrite as N ^ Nitrate as N ^ Total nitrogen ^ Ortho phosphate as P ^ Total phosphorus ^ Chlorophyll a ^ Biochemical oxygen demand tBOD5) ^ Tributary flow rate ii. Location Lagoons: A minimum of one sample site in each segment or portion of a segment shall be selected. The sampling site shall represent ambient water conditions and shall not be influenced by storm drain flaw or other effluent discharges. Tributaries: A minimum of one sample site shall be selected in the tributary to the water quality limited segment, upstream of the tidal prism. The sampling site shall represent ambient water conditions and shall not be influenced by storm drain flow or other effluent discharges. iii. Frequency/Duration Time composite samples will consist of one sample collected every 15 minutes at the same location tat 0 min., 15 min., and 30 min.). These three samples are then composited into one sample to take to the lab for analysis. Lagoons: For tidally influenced lagoons, at a minimum, time composite samples shall be collected twice daily for the two two-week periods corresponding to the two-week periods of hourly sensor data collection. One sample shall be collected during high tide, the other sample during low tide. Tidally influenced lagoons include Santa Margarita Lagoon, Loma Alta Slough, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, Los Penasquitos Lagoon, and Famosa Slough and Channel. The mouth opening can is Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 be maintained by dredging and still be considered a tidally influenced lagoon. For non-tidally influenced lagoons, at a minimum, time composite samples shall be collected once daily for two two-week periods. Tributaries: For tributaries {and non-tidal lagoons), at a minimum, time composite samples shall be collected once daily for two two-week periods corresponding to the two-week periods of hourly sensor data collection. A6. RAINFALL DATA REPRESENTATIVE OF THE WATERSHED The Monitoring Program Workplans shall include precipitation monitoring and describe at a minimum the rainfall sampling device to be used, location of the gage, and frequency and duration of sampling as indicated below for the watersheds with impaired water quality limited segments. If an established and ongoing rainfall gage can be identified that is representative of the watershed, then the data from that gage may be used in place of a newly established gage specific to this project. If the rain monitoring equipment becomes inoperative, it must be repaired or replaced within 7 days. The San Diego Water Board must be notified within 24 hours of the failure of any of the rain monitoring equipment. If an established gage is used, the Workplan must specify who is responsible for maintaining and collecting data from this gage. The gage shall collect the following information: i. Constituents Rainfall measured in 1 /100t" inches per hour. ii. Location The rainfall gage shall be placed in a location that is representative of each watershed with an impaired waterbody. iii. Frequency/Duration The rainfall gage shall be operational to collect measurements continuously during every rainfall event commencing with the first storm after October 1, 2007, until the cessation of the monitoring program described in the Workplans. A7. LAGOON SEDIMENT SAMPLE The Monitoring Program Workplans shall include at a minimum the constituents, sampling locations, and frequency and duration of sediment sampling as indicated below for the pollutants impairing a water quality limited segment. Site-specific changes to this sampling specification may be proposed to the San Diego Water Board along with the scientific rationale for the changes. Any proposed changes may not be implemented until incorporated into this Order by amendment. i. Constituents All lagoons impaired for nutrient/eutrophication and/or sedimentation/siltation: ~1 Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 Grain size distribution July 19, 2006 ii. Location A minimum of one sample site in each lagoon segment or portion of a segment shall be selected. iii. Frequency/Duration ^ A minimum of one sample shall be collected using surficial sampling tubes during each two-week period of hourly sensor data collection. ^ A minimum of one sample shall be collected within 72 hours after the beginning of each storm event monitored for pollutagraph data described in Section 3. A8. SPECIAL STUDIES The Monitoring Program Workplans shall include, at a minimum, the fallowing one- time surveys of waters impaired for eutrophic conditions/nutrients: + Macrophyte and periphyton {estimation of biomass} + Sediment oxygen demand + Nutrient flux from sediments A9. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MONITORING PROGRAM The Dischargers shall submit an adequate Quality Assurance Project Plan {QAPP} for field and laboratory operations by September 1, 2007, as described below. If, within 30 days after submittal of the QAPP, na comments have been received from the San Diego Water Board, the Dischargers shall implement the QAPP and Workplans. a. The QAPP for field operations shall include, at a minimum, the following: ^ Quality assurance objectives; ^ Sample container preparation, labeling and storage; ^ Chain-of-custody tracking; ^ Field setup; ^ Sampler equipment check and setup; ^ Sample collection; ^ Use of field blanks to assess field contamination; ^ Use of field duplicate samples; ^ Transportation to the laboratory; ^ Training of field personnel; and ^ Evaluation and enhancement if needed of the QA/QC plan. b. The QAPP for laboratory operations shall include, at a minimum, the following: ^ Quality assurance objectives; ^ Organization of laboratory personnel, their education, experience, and duties; ^ Sample procedures; 12 Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 ^ Sample custody; ^ Calibration procedures and frequency; ^ Analytical procedures; ^ Data reduction, validation, and reporting; ^ Internal quality control procedures; ^ Performance and system audits; ^ Preventive maintenance; ^ Assessment of accuracy and precision; ^ Correction actions; and a ^ Quality assurance report. July 19, 2006 Furthermore, the QAPP shall meet the standards as set forth in the Quality Assurance Project Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program {SWAMP}. The SWAMP QAPP can be found on the World Wide Web at: http:I/www.swrcb.ca.goYlswamp/index.html. A10. DATA REPORTS Data Reports containing monitoring results from implementation of the Monitoring Program Workplan shall be submitted within 90 days after each distinct period of data collection has been completed. Data reports shall consist of electronic copies of laboratory results in either WORD or PDF format, and data compilations in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet format. A11. CHANGES TO ORDER The Dischargers may propose changes or alternatives to the directives in this Order if a valid rationale for the changes is shown. The Dischargers shall implement proposed changes upon amendment of this Order by the San Diego Water Board. B. PROVISIONS 1. Duty to Comply -The Dischargers} shall obtain all permits and access agreements needed to implement the Directives of this Order. The Discharger{s} shall properly manage, treat, and/or dispose of contaminated water samples in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 2. Request to Provide Information -The Dischargers} may present characterization data, preliminary interpretations and conclusions as they become available, rather than waiting until a report is prepared. This type of on-going reporting can facilitate a consensus being reached between the Discharger{s) anc the San Diego Water Board and may result in overall reduction of the time necessary to meet data needs. 3. Waste Constituent Analysis -All analyses shall be conducted at a laboratory certified for such analyses by the State Department of Health Services. Specific methods of analysis must be identified. If the Discharger{s} proposes to use methods or test procedures other than those included in the most current version of 40 CFR 136, Guidelines Establishing Test Pt~ocedures for the Analysis of Pollutants; i3 Investigation Order No. R9-2446-476 July 19, 2446 Procedures for Detection and Quantification, the exact methodology must be submitted for review by the San Diego Water Board prior to use. The director of the laboratory whose name appears on the certification shall supervise all analytical work in his/her laboratory and shall sign all reports submitted to the San Diego Water Board. 4. Signatory Requirements - [44 CFR 122.41(k)(1 }and 44 CFR 122.22] All applications, reports, or information submitted to the San Diego Water Board shall be signed and certified. a. All reports required by this Order shall be signed as follows: (1) Responsible Corporate Officer{s) -For the purposes of this provision, a responsible corporate officer means: {i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy - ordecision-making functions for the corporation, or {ii} the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. {2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or {3) For a municipality, State, Federal or other public agency: by either a principal executive office or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes: (a} the chief executive officer of the agency; or {b) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e. g., Regional Administrators of U.S. EPA). b. All reports required by this Order and other information requested by the San Diego Water Board shall be signed by a person described in paragraph a. of this reporting requirement, or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: {1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described in paragraph a. of this report requirement; (2) The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. {A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and {3) The written authorization is submitted to the San Diego Water Board. i~ Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 c. Changes to Authorization - If an authorization under paragraph {b} of this provision is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph {b} of this provision must be submitted to the San Diego Water Board prior to or together with any reports or information to be signed by an authorized representative. d. Gertificatian Statement -Any person signing a document under paragraph a. or b. of this provision shall make the following certification: "1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, ar those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment far knowing violations. " 5. All reports/workplans required under this Order shall be submitted to: Executive Officer Attn: Water Quality Standards Unit California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region 9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92123-4340 6. Inspection and Entry - [40 CFR 122.41 {i}] [California Water Code section 13267 and 13383] The discharger shall allow the San Diego Water Board, or an authorized San Diego Water Board representative, or an authorized representative of the U.S. EPA {including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the San Diego Water Board or U.S. EPA}, upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: a. Enter upon the discharger's premises where a regulated facility ar activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Order; b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this Order; c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment {including monitoring and control equipment}, practices, or operations regulated or required under this Order; and d. Sample or monitoring at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring compliance with this Order or as otherwise authorized by the is Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 July 19, 2006 Clean Water Act or California Water Code, any substances or parameters at any location. Ordered by: Jahn H. Robertus EXECUTIVE OFFICER Date Issued: i~ Attachment 1. Responsible Dischargers Within the Watershed of a Water Quality Limited Segment. Water Quality Limited Segments HUC Municipalities and Military Facilities Counties, State Agencies, and Other Facilities Cam Pendleton 1. San Diego County Santa Margarita L 902.1 Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station 2. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District agoon Murrieta 3. Caltrans Temecula 4. North County Transit District Lama Alta Slou h 904 1 Oceanside 1. San Diego County and Ocean Shoreline . Vista 2. Caltrans Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Buena Vista Lagoon Oceanside 2. Caltrans and Ocean Shoreline 904'2 Vista San Marcos Agua Hedionda Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Lagoon and lower 904 3 Oceanside 2. Caltrans A ua Hedionda 9 ' San Marcos Creek Vista Encinitas 1. San Diego County San Elijo Lagoon and 904 6 Escondido 2. Caltrans Ocean Shoreline ' San Marcos 3. City of Escondido Hale Avenue Solana Beach Resource Recovery Facility Del Mar 1. San Diego County Los Penasquitos 906.1 Poway 2. Caltrans San Diego Famosa Slough and Channel 907.1 San Diego 1. Caltrans CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SAN DIEGO REGION ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO INVESTIGATION ORDER NO. R9-2006-0076 OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HALE AVENUE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY, AND NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCHARGE OF BACTERIA, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT, AND TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS INTO IMPAIRED LAGOONS, ADJACENT BEACHES, AND AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (hereinafter, San Diego'Water Board) finds that:. 1. Postponing by one month the due date for submitting the Workplans required by Directive Al is reasonable, provided that the Responsible Dischargers are prepared to initiate the field activities in their Workplans by October 1, 2007. 2. Information provided by the City of San Marcos (the City) verifies that the City is not located within the Buena Vista Lagoon Watershed. Accordingly, the City is not responsible for filing Monitoring Program Reports for the Buena Vista Lagoon as required by Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to sections 13267 and 13383 of the Water Code that: Directive Al (Monitoring Program Workplans) of Investigative Order No. R9- 2006-076 is revised follows: The due date of August 1, 2007, as stated in the first paragraph, for the development and submission of a Monitoring Program Workplan to the San Diego Water Board by the Dischargers is changed to September 1, 2007. Investigation Order No. ,9-2006-076 Addendum No. 1 November 1, 2006 2. The table in Attachment 1 is revised as follows: The City of San Marcos is deleted from the Buena Vista Lagoon and Ocean Shoreline section of the table as a municipality within this watershed. The revised table is shown below in Attachment 1, Revised. Date Issued: November 1, 2006 ~ ~~~~ J N. H. ROBERTUS Executive Officer 2 Investigation Order No. :9-2006-076 Addendum No. 1 ATTACHMENT 1, Revised November 1, 2006 Responsible Dischargers within the Watershed of a Water Quality Limited Segment. Water Quality Limited Se ments HUC Municipalities and Military Facilities Counties, State Agencies, and Other Facilities Cam Pendleton 1. San Diego County Santa Margarita 1 902 Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station 2. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Lagoon . Murrieta Conservation District Temecula 3. Caltrans 4. North Count Transit District Loma Alta Slough Oceanside 1. San Diego County and Ocean Shoreline 904.1 Vista 2. Caltrans Buena Vista Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Lagoon and 904.2 Oceanside 2. Caltrans Ocean Shoreline Vista Agua Hedionda Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Lagoon and lower Agua Hedionda 904.3 Oceanside San Marcos 2. Caltrans Creek Vista Encinitas 1. San Diego County San Elijo Lagoon Escondido 2. Caltrans and Ocean 904.6 San Marcos 3. City of Escondido Hale Shoreline Solana Beach Avenue Resource Recovery Facilit Del Mar 1. San Diego County Los Penasquitos 906.1 Powa 2. Caltrans San Die o Famosa Slough and Channel g07 1 San Diego 1. Caltrans 3 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SAN DIEGO REGION ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO INVESTIGATION ORDER NO. R9-2006-0076 OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HALE AVENUE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCHARGE OF BACTERIA, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT, AND TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS INTO IMPAIRED LAGOONS, ADJACENT BEACHES, AND AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (hereinafter, San Diego Water Board) finds that: 1. Persons Responsible for the Discharge: The North County Transit District permanently ceased its dewatering discharge into the Santa Margarita Lagoon on March 1, 2007, and should no longer be responsible for filing the Monitoring Program Reports required by Order R9-2006-0076 (Order). 2. Monitoring Program Workplan: The responsible dischargers have filed with the San Diego Water Board the Monitoring Program Workplan required by directive Al of the Order. The workplan, written by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, titled "San Diego Coastal Lagoons TMDL Monitoring Workplan" (Attachment 2) was timely received by the San Diego Water Board on June 18, 2007. The workplan addresses all seven impaired lagoons. Pursuant to directive A11, the responsible dischargers proposed changes and alternatives to the monitoring requirements in directives Al through A8 of the Order, and provided a valid rationale for these changes in the workplan. The workplan is adequate to guide the collection of monitoring data needed to characterize dry weather flow and storm flow influenced water quality in the segments listed in Table 1 of the Order to complete development of TMDLs, and load and wasteload allocations and reductions. The workplan study questions a through h3 listed in directive Al were revised in the monitoring workplan. 3. Data Report Submittal: The responsible dischargers requested that directive A10 be changed to require quarterly filing of data reports on January 1St, April 1St, July 1St, and October 1St, rather than within 90 days of each distinct Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 Addendum No. 2 June 21, 2007 period of data collection. This request provides more specificity regarding when data reports are due. In addition, fewer data submittals will take less time to enter into the models to be used for TMDL development. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to sections 13267 and 13383 of the Water Code that: 1. The North County Transit District is no longer responsible for filing the Monitoring Program Reports required by Order No. R9-2006-0076 and Addendum No.. 1. The table in Attachment 1, Revised, to Addendum No. 1 is revised a second time as follows: The North County Transit District is deleted from the Santa Margarita Lagoon section of the table as a Responsible Discharger within this watershed. The revised table is shown in Attachment 1, Second Revision, to this Addendum No. 2. 2. The study questions in the Monitoring Program Workplan titled "San Diego Coastal Lagoons TMDL Monitoring Workplan", dated June 18, 2007, (Attachment 2) supersede the study questions a through h3 in directive A1. 3. The monitoring requirements in the Monitoring Program Workplan supersede directives A2 through A8. 4. The Responsible Dischargers identified in Attachment 1, Second Revision, shall file with the San Diego Water Board quarterly data reports, one for each lagoon watershed, due on January 1St, April 1St, July 1St, and October 1 St containing monitoring results collected from 90 to 120 days (or sooner) prior to the reporting due date. At a minimum, data reports shall consist of electronic copies of laboratory results, including quality assurance/quality control data, in either WORD or PDF format and data compilations in EXCEL spreadsheet format. The reports must identify the analytical methods used, detection limits obtained for each reported constituent, and a map showing the location of monitoring stations. This directive supersedes directive A10 of Order No. R9-2006-0076. J N. H. ROBERTUS Executive Officer Date Issued: June 21, 2007 2 Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 Addendum No. 2 June 21, 2007 Attachment 1, Second Revision Responsible Dischargers within the Watershed of a Water Quality Limited Segment. Water Quality Limited Se menu `HUC Municipalities and Military Facilities Counties, State Agencies, and Other` Facilities Cam Pendleton 1. San Diego County Santa Margarita L 902.1 Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station 2. Riverside County Flood Control and Water agoon Murrieta Conservation District Temecula 3. Caltrans Loma Alta Slough Oceanside 1. San Diego County and Ocean Shoreline 904.1 Vista 2. Caltrans Buena Vista Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Lagoon and 904.2 Oceanside 2. Caltrans Ocean Shoreline Vista Agua Hedionda Carlsbad 1. San Diego County Lagoon and lower Agua Hedionda 904.3 Oceanside San Marcos 2. Caltrans Creek Vista Encinitas 1. San Diego County San Elijo Lagoon Escondido 2. Caltrans and Ocean 904.6 San Marcos 3. City of Escondido Hale Shoreline Solana Beach Avenue Resource Recovery Facilit Del Mar 1. San Diego County Los Penasquitos 906.1 Powa 2. Caltrans San Die o Famosa Slough and Channel 907 1 San Diego 1. Caltrans Investigation Order No. R9-2006-076 Addendum No. 2 June 21, 2007 ATTACHMENT 2. FOR INVESTIGATION ORDER NO. R9-2006-0076. See "Workplan for San Diego Lagoons TMDL Monitoring -Final 6-18-2007. pdf'. 4 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SAN DIEGO REGION ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO INVESTIGATION ORDER NO. R9-2006-0076 OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HALE AVENUE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCHARGE OF BACTERIA, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT, AND TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS INTO IMPAIRED LAGOONS, ADJACENT BEACHES, AND AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (hereinafter, San Diego Water Board) finds that: 1. Need for Land Elevation Data at Ocean Inlets: Data are needed to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) and their associated load and wasteload allocations and reductions for the water quality limited water body segments identified in Table 1 of Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076 for each impairing pollutant. The San Diego Water Board intends to develop TMDLs, allocations, and reductions through modeling studies of the water quality limited lagoons and their watersheds. Land elevations across the ocean inlets to the lagoons are needed to configure accurate boundary conditions between the lagoons and the ocean in the lagoon models. 2. Regulatory Authority and Necessity: Water Code Section 13267 authorizes the San Diego Water Board to require the submission of monitoring reports from any person discharging pollutants into waters of the State. Water Code Section 13383 authorizes the San Diego Water Board to establish monitoring and reporting requirements for discharges regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Reporting of land elevation data will ensure accurate boundary configuration of the ocean inlets in the models of the lagoons as described in finding 1. The modeling studies are part of an overall water quality investigation to assess the conditions of pollution in the lagoons and develop TMDLs for the lagoons. These actions will result in the restoration and protection of water quality necessary to support the designated beneficial uses of these waterbodies. The cost to produce a bathymetry survey of all of Famosa Slough was approximately $3,700. Surveying across-section of land elevations at an ocean inlet should cost significantly less, since it is a survey of a single, two dimensional cross-section, as opposed to a three dimensional survey of an entire lagoon. The associated costs of surveying cross-sections of the ocean inlets of Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076 October 5, 2007 Addendum No. 3 the lagoons bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the actions, specifically the protection of water quality and beneficial uses. 3. California Environmental Quality Act: This action is an order to enforce the laws and regulations administered by the San Diego Water Board. As such, this action is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15308 of the Public Resources Code. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to sections 13267 and 13383 of the Water Code that: C. Ocean Inlet Land Elevation Data C1. Elevation Data Requirements The dischargers identified in Attachment 1, Second Revision, to Addendum No. 2 to Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076 shall submit across-section showing the land elevations of the ocean inlet to each lagoon identified in Attachment 1, Second Revision. The cross-sections of the ocean inlets (except for Los Penasquitos Lagoon and Buena Vista Lagoon) shall be surveyed immediately prior to the start of the first index monitoring period described in the Monitoring Program Workplan titled "San Diego Coastal Lagoons TMDL Monitoring Workplan" dated June 18, 2007 (Attachment 2 to Addendum No. 2 to Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076). The number of points to be surveyed along the cross-section shall be adequate to describe the width, depth, and shape of the inlet and its banks. The cross-section shall be surveyed at the location along the length of the inlet where the bottom of the inlet is at its highest elevation. If a beach berm has closed the inlet, the cross-section shall be surveyed at the location where the beach berm is at its highest elevation. If the width, depth, or shape of the inlet and its banks changes significantly' prior to the start of any subsequent index monitoring period, the cross-section of the inlet shall be resurveyed before the subsequent index monitoring period commences. The cross-section shall be resurveyed at the same location along the length of the inlet that was previously surveyed. Surveys of the ocean inlet at Los Penasquitos Lagoon shall be conducted in the same manner as above. However, the initial survey shall be conducted within three weeks of the beginning of the continuous monitoring period (October 1 - March 31), rather than immediately prior to the first index monitoring period. Subsequent surveys shall be conducted during the continuous monitoring period following each storm event that results in a significant change to the width, depth, or shape of the inlet and its banks. Since Buena Vista Lagoon is never open to tidal exchange, the ocean inlet for this lagoon does not need to be surveyed. Significant changes include opening of the ocean inlet due to storm events, opening of the ocean inlet by mechanical means, and other clearly visible alterations of the ocean inlets width, depth, or shape, as determined by best professional judgment. 2 Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076 October 5, 2007 Addendum No. 3 C2. Elevation Data Submittal The cross-sections of the ocean inlets shall be submitted as part of the corresponding data reports required by directive 4 of Addendum No. 2 to Investigation Order No. R9-2006-0076. C3. Contractor/Consultant Qualifications All survey submittals shall be signed by and stamped with the seal of a California professional land surveyor. The surveys shall be conducted according to the standards of practice of professional land surveyors in California. ;~ ~- ~. -, ,'' %~~~ ~ s /~ `~ , J<O'}-IN. H. ROBERTUS Executive Officer Date Issued: October 5, 2007 3 O 4 N O O N LL f.~ a .~ L ~~/ 6L O .~ 0 0 a D c N YQY~._ r'"1 C O U 00 C J -~ J C ~ ~ fJ U ~ O (~ O (~ ~ ~ C ~ O Q ~ ~ N N <t Q N U~J ~ ~ a~ ~ a--~ +~ ~ ~~ to f~- ~ ~ lC? ~ O r a~~i U (6 N r ~ U (6 ~ ~ ~ U (6 O V o0 ~ O O rn +'' ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q Q ~ Q1 ~ ~ N ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ L o ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ (~6 (6 (6 ~ ~ .U ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ a ~ a rn ~ ~ ~ ~ .a L 0 ~ t.1 J r ~,"" J O N ('') r ~ O N ~ ch 111 ~ O lC~ CQ CO Lt7 V I~ V U r 00 ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c '~ ~ O r M a 0 " f- ~ ~ ~ t ~ C J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~- +-' C N O M r (D (D O ~ 11'1 ~D O O ~ O ~ 111 O O N fD O c V O N ti O ~ O N O M O O r ~ ~ N M O r O 111 O Q1 M ~ ~ O O 00 O Efl (D ~ 'd' I~ M M O 111 f~ N I~ Q1 M O O M I~ ~ f~ 00 00 10 O l1'1 ~- 00 f~ + ~+ N N M ~ r f~ N Efl N ~ N(f1 Efl d9 d9 ER ER d9 NEfl ~a O I` ~ O C'7 O O N O O G1 >r O ~ N I` c9 O ~ h- 00 O a o p r V O O r O CO r V' r = ~ oo co o co co bs a~ ~- v o0 dl o . .r VI ~ ~- CO I` ~ O O~ Cf? ~ ,.~. t. ~ ~ ~ o ~ _ ~ ~ + + + . O N c~ EA O m to ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~» ~» ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.a o r o Cfl V O o ~ ~ ~ ,a O (,fl ~ O L(7 L(7 N O ~ V Cfl O Efl C7 c0 ~7' am r ~ c Q ~ tC ( 9 ~ O c - tD rn tD Lt7 r tD a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °v°~~ O c~ c~ r3 c~ o C~ c~ c~ O ln rn rn a~ rn o rn rn rn ll~ y ^ ~ SG l f~ (~ (~ (~ (''~ O c~ (~ (~ I~ _ ,,., L '~ 1/1 ~ M O c~ c~ c~ c*~ Efl c~ c~ c~ M Q1 ~ ~ r r r r r r r a ~ t av ~ m oo ~ m ~ co ~ ca ~ co ~ ca ~ oo ~ cr .~ ~ ~ ` U ~ C ~ ~` ~ ~ n. }, ~ ~ ~ .o ~ ~ ~ ~ R _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ to o ° U °~ ~ v U ~ z ~ ~ ~ o o U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ d ~ ~ 1- ~ ~ ~ U z ~ U ~ H O O O O N ~- LL O O 0 N LL O 0 O N a~ E Q I ~ ~ O N ~_ ~ _~ '~ LL ~ c _ 1~ ~ ~ O (n _ ~ a ~ - ~ ~ ~ LL ~ C N ~ ~ ~ U_ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ v v C U_ O '~ ~J C ~ ~~ i~.Q ~ a. ~ ~ ~ U .~ ~_ C Q O N ~ ~~ v ~~ .Q ~ ~ U Q ~ O ~U E ~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~ ~ C as ~ ~ ~~ ~~ v ~ v ~ ~ O ~ ~, ~ L (~ ~ J ~ ~~ U ~ z .~ ~ ~ ai a~i c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o C ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ (6 C ~ (~ U ~ ° ~ ~v~z o ~ ~ ~ v d °o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ct) U , ~ ~ # ~' ~' ~~~ N rl' O~ O~ ~ ~ 07 CSC CD Cfl ~ O ~ CO '7 67 CO (~ N EY) ~I (a Ef3 ~ r `7 I~ 69 Cfl 00 r (~ (*~ r CfJ N Cfl E9~~c-~ CV ~~(9 Eta Efl Efl ffl Efl O r O N C1 O O N LL to L ~~/ 6L O .~ N 0 0 a w O .~++ C O U 00 C J ~ +~' J C ~ ~ fJ U ~ O (~ O c~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ Q N N <t Q N U~J ~ L ~ ~ a~ ~ a--~ +~ ~ ~~ to V f~- ~ ~ V lC? ~ ~ O ~ ~ U (6 ~ N cro ~ U (6 ~ ~ ~ ~ U (6 O O v o ~ O a ~ rn +'' ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q Q ~ Q1 ~ ~ N ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ L o ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ (~6 (6 (6 ~ ~ .U ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ a ~ a rn ~ ~ ~ ~ .a L 0 ~ t.1 J r ~,"" J O N ('') S O O N ~ ch 111 ~ O ~ cQ CO ~ V ti V U ~ 00 ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ O ~ M a O f- ~ ~ ~ t ~ C J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~- +-' O N O ~ O M N O M N 00 O O ~ Q1 ~ 111 O N I~ fD O o U o o ri cD ~ o o o ri o O r r r r d' r O r O r f~ to r O M 10 M O O I~ I~ 00 N O 111 I~ ~D 111 O O O f~ ~ O l11 r to 0 ~ ~ O O O ~ O ~ ~ + ~+ 00 ~ Q 1 ~ ~ ~ 00 N (D ~ ~7 Sf ~ ~ ~ ~ d9 d9 d9 {~/> b9 r Efl ER ~a O ('7 00 0 I~ O O r p O G1 >r .a O 0 0 ~ c0 0 0 CD ~(7 O ,~ ~ ~ N Q1 O c0 N c0 O CO CO C'7 N O 64 c0 (9 N Cr3 O N ~ ~D ~ 0 0= G1 0. ~+ to Q1 N O N f~ (h Cr3 EA O „'' ~ Q1 O V I~ ~ r- ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~ ~v ~ fi3 64 ~, a o cs~ o d- cfl v o Q1 C i^ a O lC) O f~ c7 c7 O ~ ~ ~ O c0 O ~ ~ I~ I~ N Q) y c p ~ 00 ~ O N - . O .... - ~ 0 ~ cQ ~ 1 11 V tf} 111 a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ °v°~~ _ ~ C y ^ ~ N ~- ~-- r r 0 r- r ~c- N +.~ ~ ~ a ~ r cfl o o o o ~ o o o r ~D O S co co co co ca co co a t v ~ ~ M V ~ V ~ ~ ~ V ~ V ~ V ~ V ~ M ~ ~ ` U ~ C ~ ~` ~ ~ n. }, ~ ~ ~ .o ~ ~ ~ ~ R _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ to o ° U °~ ~ v U ~ z ~ ~ ~ o o U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ d ~ ~ 1- ~ ~ ~ U z ~ U ~ H O O O N ~- LL O O 0 N O 0 O N a~ E Q I ~ ~ O N ~_ ~ _~ '~ LL ~ c _ 1~ ~ ~ O (n _~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ C N ~ ~ ~ U_ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ v v C U_ O '~ ~J C ~ ~~ ~ .Q ~ a. ~ ~ ~ U .~ ~_ C Q O N ~ ~~ v ~~ .~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ O ~U E ~ o ~ ~ a~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~ ~ C as ~ ~ ~~ ~~ v ~ v ~ ~ O ~ ~, ~ L (~ ~ J ~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~ z .~ ~ ~ ai a~i c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o C ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ (6 C ~ (~ U ~ ° ~ ~v~z o ~ ~ ~ v d °o ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ct) U , ~ ~ # ~' ~' UPDATED COST SHARES DUE TO ADDENDUM NO. 3 OLD Cost Share Partner FY2008-09 FY2009-10 TOTAL Riverside County $28,298.90 12.43% $14,030.71 10.44% $42,329.74 Temecula $38,743.20 17.01 % $18,810.77 13.99% $57,554.14 Murrieta $45,903.63 20.16% $22,087.89 16.43°l0 $67,991.72 Caltrans** $10,380.18 4.56% $6,074.21 4.52% $16,454.43 North Count Transit District** $a.oo 0.00% $0.00 0.00% $0.00 San Die o Coun *** $75,016.39 32.94% $54,085.53 40.23% $129,102.25 Camp Pendleton**** $21,074.19 9.25% $14,411.75 10.72% $35,486.03 Fallbrook Naval Station***** $8,333.01 3.66% $4,949.63 3.68% $13,282.68 Total $227,750.61 100.00% $134,449.23 100.00% $362,200.84 N E1N Cost Share Partner FY2008 FY2009 TOTAL Riverside County $29,396.65 12.43% $14,228.33 10.44% $43,624.98 Temecula $40,246.09 17.01 % $19,075.71 13.99% $59,321.80 Murrieta $47,684.28 20.16% $22,398.99 16.43% $70,083.27 Caltrans** $10,782.83 4.56% $6,159.77 4.52% $16,942.60 North Count Transit District** $0.00 0.00% $o.o0 0.00% $0.00 San Die o Coun *** $77,926.36 32.94% $54,847.31 40.23% $132,773.67 Camp Pendleton""** $21,891.68 9.25% $14,614.74 10.72% $36,506.42 Fallbrook Naval Station***** $8,656.26 3.66% $5,019.35 3.68% $13,675.60 Total $236,585.30 100.00% $136,342.90 100.00% $372,929.20 ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~D ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O M U o a o 0 0 0 0 o ci o 0 0 o ai cci co 0 cfl o v N co cfl O o o N v co ~ v co N ss o ~ O C~ CO r r r N r r r r O N CO r r O ~ ('') (''a N N CO CD O O O N V N V ~ ~ CD ~ Efl 6S ~3 r r r N ~- r r r N N Efl i`- N ~ Efl Efl ffl ffl 69 d3 64 ffl EH Efl EH ~ ~ x W ya o 0 N ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~c; o F V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ r O LCD O O ~ O O LCD i.t? O LCD O O N N 'a ~ O I~ Q Cr3 V V LC7 N N C~? C*) CD (,Q r `-' ` ~ Efl Ef3 64 Efl fi} ffl Efl Efl d3 ffl Efl Efl ffl Efl V L ~ Q // ~n { ~ W V T Q S ~ 7 N(~ ~ ~ LL -~ ++ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ' 0 ' 0 ' 0 ' 0 - o c~ O ' o ' ~ V ~t ~J mil V V ~! v c~ rl V ~ L w ~ C C C (~ (~ (A SA (~ (~ (~ (A {A fA (~ / x ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ . i ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O R ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 3 N ~ tll ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ tll ~ N ~ r .+ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' O O ~ ~ U O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~n ~ ~n a Q a Q d Q a Q a d d ~- E ~ ~ ~ ~' a~ ~ ~ ~ ('~ Cf7 a N O "~ L1J W ~ ~ N z z m ' ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ m d m ~ O O ? (' = ~ N O N ~ +-~ ~ ~ ~ O o ` o ° ° 0 `Y' ~ ~ v ~ w o a o o o o c~ ~ C. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ O W ~ ~ ~ <t Q `r ~ a~ ~ U ~ o ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ o z a •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Q~ 1 .~ ~ C ~ (/~ ~ C O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ O ~ U O o p ~ ~ . u, o v ~ U ~ (6 ~ ~ ~ v Q ~ ~ O ~ J (~ O ~ o (~ C ~ Cl ~ ~ C ~ a ~ LJJ ~ ~. _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ L a ~ ~ N o o ~ v ~ m o o p c ~ ~ as ~ d a~ ~ ~ Y d ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~ CC ~ m ~ v z Q N c~ a ~ ~ ~ r ~ i-- z z ¢ cn U U F- o ~ . , ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ N ~ ~, N , ~ c~ c~ ~ ~ cfl r~- co rn ° r ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ._ J J d U C`.7 H 0 U (7 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 4~ J N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 r t~ ~ t~ r 0 7 0 N ~ O M O N M 117 7 h- 47 N ~ ~6N469 ~Y V O 696469 M 69 ff> 69 1T7 117 1(7 1(7 O ~ O N f~- f~- 1C7 N O 67 N r N M N M N bN4 ~ COO 69 U) 69 O O u7 LL7 117 O 11I O O N fem. f~ u7 N O N Q1 N r N o~ N 47 19 N N f+ T 64 M N EA 69 CO 64 ~ 69 d O O O O N~ O N~ I~ ~ op h- O N O 117 N U7 ~ O M O U7 (fl t~ 19 U7 U7 ~ M N M N FA b4 69 V L!J 69 64 ~ 64 b4 a0 O t17 lf7 O lC7 O 117 O O N I~ O N U7 c~- O N O N O 1i7 N CV r to (O I~ (O tl~ N r En M N 64 64 En ~ ~ 64 Ea 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn6464~ro u71n641no u7 O N cO 117 M 1fJ V O r N V 7 7 N 69 h- 1t i lf? ER M LL ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao 0 0 0 0 1n 1n o 1n o 1n O ap r I~ N N u7 O O u7 I~ ~ O M O N 7 M 0 I~ ~ 6M9 6N4 64 ~ 6~4 b~9 69 b4 69 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 (~-- V h- 0 7 0 N O M O N M 1t7 ~~~ N ° M N 64 'S O O ~ ~3 b4 69 Ef# Ef3 ER M 69 U# 6h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 O o 0 0 0 M O m tf') F- ~t V N ~ O O b4 b9 U fA Eff 69 Uf u N N T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00oo64ot»64 ° O 1` N Q1 O ~ 7 N M r N `p Ef3 lA 64 64 7 ~ 64 m J +-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 69 U3 64 ~ V O to N ~ O O ~ ~ O ~- tf! 69 V '~ ~ ~ 6 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O tf} O 64 O O O O LO V CO O d' (O O ~ O N tf') V M F- ~ 64 a] lCJ J Ef3 69 64 U3 lA W O N F- N 'S ~' 'O ... O O C C ~ •• ~ 'Q ~ ~ Q 01-0 ~ ~ m Q 7 .~ ~ (/) cL c O ~ `ofd O p ~ ~ ~ ~ as ° ~ ~ ~ ~ x a p ~ ~, a m o° o ° o~ Q a~i a~i ~acna~n050~~ N N N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ?+ O N ~ n O Ill O CO N N ~ C ~ RS ~ a Y ~ >O ~ 7 O O c 0 ~ O CO 117 N O` ~ ~ o O no ~ o ~ ~ ~ II Q C O ~ O ~ °7 7 O O O N.~Z ~' ~ U '-'- o O ~ ~ ~ ~ O a o Q u7 J+ O n~ o 'o s= o ~ ~mrtr ~ o- o I I O Q ~ ~ O Cn ~ X O O (n~~Z C ~ ll. 00 ~ II O ~ °O T '~ (d O ~ N ~ _ ~ ~ Q O o7 ~ O ¢ ~ O O ° "" O O O~ C O o N N _ ° ~ O O O N ~ ~ 7 O y aMi aMi a o m II C C Q1 C {r} ~ O ~ ~ 'C G O N 0 0 °- ° ~ ~ (~ d' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ O O (n L71 O h- O O ~ ._~ T O _ _ O- T . o ~ ~ ~ T T (n ~ ~ ~ 7 7 ~ 7 C I II Qc~ O RY ~ p7 Q op m m~.C ~ O O O -~ (n O O N N ~ ~ Q 2' >- >" ° ~ N O IL lL d (n d' CL] m M 47 0 0 M in Y Q rH V z O r Z Z O O (9 Q J 0 ~ ~ m a ~ ~ ~ *% c j o C +-, +, z ~ ~ o C~ m a~ o. E y O 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m m Q z cfl `fl `fl co cfl cfl c° `fl c4 cfl c° cU CU C° cfl `fl cfl cn cfl cfl `fl cfl E 0 a ~ Q" ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~ c r C m > N i a a 7 +' ~ a i > +' 15 m a~ ~~ Q o~ ~ o a~ a~ o ~ ~ ~ ° N z E ~ ..~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ + _ o ~ + _ o c~ lL N N 0 A N N "' N > E N O "` N > m m ~ N Y m 'g O 1+ ~ ~.. 0 CC C cc G N C ' ~ ~ ~ ~ Gl C~ ~n ~ ~ Z o CL. o m o N o ~C o d n ~ o U) ~ a ~ ~ o f!I ~, ? ~- Z o d o m o N o ~ o d n ~ o O o (n ~ ~ ~ Z o Q„ o m o N o ~C o d ~ ~ 0 0 0 F-- i- ~-- Z Z ~ ~n m ~ . - ~ ~- ,- ~- Z Z ~ c~ m ~ ~- ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~n m ~ ~ ~ ~ d U U Q CC U a d ~ c E mw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ = ~ E a ~ ~ E ~ ~ ,, o a ~ 0 a 0 a a~ ~ ~ ~ ro Q ~ ~ ~ su Q ~ ~ as Q ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N Q- _ f+ N N _ ti N _ ti N O Y O O ~ ~ ~ UJ C N ~ O ~ ~ i N i f0 _~ N O U J _ ~ O ~ a_ Q~ (0 ~ C O C O Q. ~ O 67 O ~ (6 (d (~ ~ ~ _! J ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ L `p LSI Y ~ ~- i O (~ N +-~ O 3 O ~ ~ ~ O O ca ~ V) ~' _ J ti 0 0 m ~n a~ 0 V Q (6 O (6 O C V/ Y Q ~~ V Nz I.f~ Z Z O O (9 Q J - ~ 0 ~ +, ~ ~.- ~ +~ 0 0 00 0 Q a 0 ~ ~ ~ o - ~ ~ ~ ° ~ m ~ ~ Z Q +n ~ °Z-o c ~ 0 ~ `L as ~ - N ~ ~ ~ z s ~ `~ o a i a i a i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' 0 0 E ~ ~ ~ o Q ~-+ ~-+ ~ ~ ~-+ O O O O O RS U U U U U y ~ ~_ O ~_ ~ N ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ li7 r li7 r i.O t - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ f9 f9 C9 !9 CO Cfl f9 S9 Cf? Cfl C4 f Q Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C G 3 0 0 0 0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I (~ `~ o al 'O _ ~ -p ~ O C1 O Q ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~({6j p ~ ~ } Y ?j O (0 O ++ ~ .F + 13 ~ N ~ o' ° ~' ~ ~ m ° > ~ ~ ~ ° sa Z ~ ,r +~ L O ~ N ~ -6 O ~ O ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0 c6 to ~ ~, U) L C N C O ~ ~ ~ N Q ~ '~ C ~ '] ~ ~ ({S ~1 Gl (n Z ~ Z ~ M N ~ ~~ ~ Lfa ~ O ~ U ~ pOy FO- _ Y '6 ~ i O ~ Z d ~ N ~C ~ ~ ~ O (n I- ~ o o O O O ~ ff' O O C 'C ~ Q ~ O ~ ~- ~ p o O O 0 ~' O O O SC I- ~ ~- Z Z c (n CO ~ '~ ~ 0 a_ N "O ] f- ~ f Z Z E (n CO ~ LL ~ ~ U U as oZ is ~ ~ p E U U o ~ O ~ ~ c o- 3 ~ ~ ~ d ~ cts Q ~ Q O d ~ N ~ ~ ~ LL 65 LL ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ C O _ ~ Y ~ V ~ Cn ~ O J ~ ~ p W N O ~ J (n GS N ~ Q E E ~ py ~ C C C Y p~ ~ f~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ O a :~ ~ d N ti 0 0 m ~n 0 +~ 0 V Q U (6 O (6 O C ~ ° ~ ~ °~ a~ cas ~ ~~ ~ S4 ~ ~ U O ~ ~ n5 O ;: a-T~ ~ N t0 -° z y ~ U C ~ ~ U ~ o a i ~' m m U ~ ca Z O N U>~ p 7 N N (6 U ~ N O ~ U ~ T d ~ ~ ~ tlI ~ ~ ~ Q ~ O Y ~ d ~ ~ W ° -~ o ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CV N (V N CV ~ UJ (Jl (Jl y O (!~ O .N O .~ O .N O (6 (6 ~ Q O Q~ Q O Q~ C c0 C ca C ~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ C ~~ ~ ~ V ~' V V ~' 'mot V' ~t V S2 ~ ~ tU i N N N N N N N N N N N {Q ~ ~ E ~~ O~ O~ O~ O O O ~ j O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N a + ~ O U O U O U U ~° c v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ° V) a a i ~ s ~ ~ , ~ ~ N° ~ '~ a a~ Y U ~. o r N ~, L o ca . N ~, i o m N ~ 0 0~ N ~ C ~ o~~~ o~~~ o~~~ ~o ~~ ~£ a ~ o ~. Q~ Q~ ~ Q~ S , ~ U. ~ o ~ _ T ~' +L-+ ~ ~ 7+ +L+ ~ ~ i0 ?' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ '6 T O C S i1 - ~~ C O ~~ C N 3~ C N N Q O~ ~ O Z lL 4 L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~, v _ 0 _ . .. f7 O ~ ~ f ~ ~_ cZ G Z O O C7 C N C O C N C N N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ dl ~ ~ ~ x O ~ ~ y ~ ~ x O ~ ~ ~ ~ x O ~ '~ ~ ~ _ x O ~ y ~ z ~ z ~ (J N ~ ~ d ~ ~ O ~j ~ .V ~ O C ~~ 2 O ~ N N C ~ 2 O ~ O " O ~ ~ = N ~ N N ~ ~~ 2 O ~ N - ~ I- I- ~ ~ O 0 ~ (n m ~ LL N _ -U L ~ ~ > ~ a-~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ +~ U ~ ~ > ~ +~ ~ ~ U > ~ i-+ U ~ U U +~ O O f G a °~,' O ~ ~? ~ ~ ,~ O ~ a~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ Q N J .a o 0 0 o a ~ .c o 0 0 o ca a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tt~^^+ 4f ~ ''inn.~ y! ~ 'i'^^+ V/ ~ ''Y^^ V/ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ V C ~ ~ ~ ~ V) ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ U U U U m p (n r N U ~ ~ O ~ O i N +~ ~ ~ O J N ~ ~ N ~~ ~ C ~ ~ ~~ Q. W `~ o ~ o ~ v o W rp ~ ~ co J to J ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ?~ r ~ C ' (G y fC ~ s.. = ~ 7 ~. ~ 0 ~ ~ ° s 0 ti 0 0 m ~n Y Q H C7 Z_ ~' O Z 0 z 0 rQ V Q J C~ C m ,~ O Z d O. ~ ~ ~~ (qj T y ~ O c6 tU "Q ~ ~ O 7 ~ C d' fC N a+ 0 a u w c a~ ti a~ ~; ~' o a~ o a ~ N_ O L d d Q UJ C C1 R U 0 a~ Q. E Y ti 0 0 m ~n N (6 a~ O V Q (6 O (6 O C Y Q Z_ ~_ Z Z O O (9 Q J o ~ ..- c °~ `o Y ~ {=>. as c ~ 0 .:: > ~ ~ o ~ N ~ z ~ o ~ o ~ ~ c +° ~ . o a~ ~ a~ Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn (~$ T T y (4 (4 (6 (6 (6 (0 (Q (6 (4 (4 ~ O C SQ C (6 C (6 C (0 C (t3 C (0 C (i3 C lt3 C f6 ~ t6 W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ Q ~ d' <t V <t ~' V' ~t V '~' ~' V R! (6 ct3 co (0 ~' '~' d' ~t ~t V" C d' <t <t V" (t3 c0 (~ RS ca O O O O O ~ ~ 0 0 O ~ i ~ i i i ~ cO ep c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 fC + ~ V V V V ~ ~ V V V a 0 ' `,A N V~~ V~ N ~ N V S V fA ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p 'O .~ ' ~ T ~ ~ ++ ~ RY p ~ -6 .~ ?, ~ ~ ++ ~ t4 ~ ~ O ~ O N ~ ~ ~ Q (tS rA O O N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q (6 to ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ m ~ ~- c ~ E v .c aNi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ai ~ a i ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ N N ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ d Gl (n Z O Z ~ M N 7 ~ ~ ~O ~ 0 ` 0 ~ = ,~, 'a ~ ~ v O UJ z a Z ~ C7 N ~ - ~C d ~ ~ ~ 0 O ~ = .~, ~ J O - ~ ~ ~ .. ~ p o 0 0 Z O ~ H O CO o s ~ " ~ (fl f . ~ ~ o 0 Z 0 Z 0 ~ ~ 0 m 0 ~ 6 SC I- ~ ~- Z c (n ~ ~ ~ O ~ F-- ~ ~-- (n ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ U U ca y o o ~ U U ~ ~ o 0 0 a ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ a~ ~ o ~ o ~ ro ~ ~ a Q1 O ~ ~ . E C O f N ~ f 7 LL fS ~ LL (~ C ~ fst (4 ~ ~ UJ ~ O r i N ~ ~ O O U O CA (n J c c ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ca c4 ~ J J a+ C O v A Y "" ~ ~ ~ ~ d i N w fsf ^ 7 ti 0 0 m ~n a~ +, 0 V Q (6 O (6 O C Y Q z ~_ Z z 0 rQ V Q J o ~ o ~ „- c w- c °~ `o > °~ `o Y L L :Md r ~ i--~ `I ~ !~ . {~ ~ +. p > ~ N ~ > m ~ N N Z ~z ~ o ~ Y o ~ ~ ~ N Y Y ~ N ~ i-~ C Q C Y ~ O O V U U lL LL N Q1 Q N N N N N N N N N N E (g N N N N N 7, N N N N N T N N (4 (6 (6 (0 (0 (6 (6 (6 (Q ~ O C SQ C (6 C (6 C (SS C (fY C (fY C (6 C (6 C (6 C (0 c0 cQ cp ~ ~ ~ cQ cp cp ~ ~ ,Q Q Q 4 Q Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl Cfl ffl CD C4 Cfl Cfl f9 Q 4 4 Q Q ~ d' '~Y V V' ~' V 'cY V '~' ~' V Si! (tf (t5 (6 (~ 6] 6] 6] ~ 07 ~ 6] 6) ~ ~ 67 (~ (t3 (6 (~ (Q O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ i i i i i cp ep c0 c0 0~ Cfl Cfl C9 [D S9 fC + ~ V V V ~i' ~ ~ ~ ~ 67 a 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `,A N V~~ V N N ~ N U `~ ~ C N N N ~ ~ ~ O T _6 .~ ~ ++ f C ~ O ~ T ~ ~~ ~ ~ ++ f6 O N~~ Q U ~ ~ fst t o f ~ 7 Q N ~ ~ (6 N ~ ~ .C 7. N Q ~ -Q ( V -6 .~ ?, r O C ~ S6 lL N a7 y ftY ~ C O ~ ~ V ~ L ~ Q N~~ N ~ V ~ N -6 N ~ 61 _ _ . ~ C C N N W ^. N ~ +" ~ ~ ~ }' ~ d Z 0 7 ~ I- -6 = > U X - (n Z CL z CL cri N ~ ~ i.0 ~ ~ O F-- _ ,*, ~ > ++ X ' (n ~ .. ~ ~ ~ Q Q U ~ ~' Q O Q ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q U ~' Q p .- ~ j O SC I- ~ ~-- Z Z c (n CO ~ N ' "6 ~ f- ~ F- Z Z ~ (A Q~ ~ N '-U j V U ~, Q Q a-+ a Q ~ OU N Q ~ UU (17 N N 0 ~ N N ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ o ~ o ~ ro d ~ ~ Q1 O Q Q . E C N 6 O ~ f 7 LL ( ~ LL (~ C C fst (4 ~ ~ C ~ O ~ 'Q U ~ ~ O J ~ ~ Q~ N U N U Q C ~ (6 t+ C Ci Y ~' . ~ t4 ~ ~ L Qf Y ti 0 0 m ~n N (6 a~ +, N 0 V Q (6 O (6 O C 2 a `~ V O J J a H 0 U C7 Z O Z O Z O rO V NJN I.f. C ~, ~ m +• c a ~ ° ~ ~ O w ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ .~ N p~j O -., Qi a7 a7 ~ Q O O Z ~, ` ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ _ w ~ ~ ~ N c6 O ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 ~ ~ (~6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ o ~~ Q ~ ~O ~ o +~ N ~ N O r N N z (SS ~ J ~ 0 0 Q r I~ r r Q 4A EA to O o ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ G a r V r Z L ~ r r a a E su ~ ~ ,r o a~i ` ' z ~ m m w E z Q O ~ N ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ U °~ ~ Q o ~ Q ._ N .Q ~ ~ Q N O ~ N ~ ~ ~ O N ~ N r N O N ~ (~ N ~ ~, . ~ o ~ ~ ~ Efl Efl EA d-? O ~ ~ d Q ~~ z w d Q r i i i 0 LLJ 0 7 Z COO ~ O U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ o N ~ .~ ~ ~_ ~_ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ O U U d d ~ ~ L ~ i i a a 0 0 (~ (~ H-? fr? y t ++ 0 a~ a a. z L r r Q~ ~ C G Z W c . Q fG ~ ~ ~ c 0 a n 0 U ~ ~ ~ _ O ~ .. ~ ~ N ~ . N N ~ ~ ~ W o ~ ~ ~ v Q LL U O O O O [O ~ N O C+7 N r (+7 r N EFT 64 d3 EA O Ql ~ ~~a~ ~O~J "~ 0 ti 0 0 m Y C .N U Q (4 ~t-~ (~ O C7 Z_ J d Q O H rO V NZ I.f.. O _~ CZ C Z rO 4V NJ I.f. C C .Q .4: ~ O ~ Z ~ _ ~ O a ~ O ~ ~ U1 . ~ Q ~ (ll U C J LQ r H ~ i Q. 0 a~ .n a 0 i Q~ ~ a Z .~ L ~ d W Q. Q7 fS5 N ~ w o d `mW Z .Q ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ U C .Q U Q ~ .O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q Q ~ ~ Q ~ •~ .c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ° E ~ Y ~ a~ ~ ~ (A U (A O O d . ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ T ~ O ~ ~ ( 6 ~ ~ U ~ a"' U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O .U ¢ ~ ~ ° a a T r~ c~ Efl 64 ffl ffl Efl O L ~ a~ a o ~ a ~ z c m w ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ .~i '1 0 L ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ N ('') N ~ i O U ~ ~ ~ N N N ~ ~ U ~ 0 ~ u, 0 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ - m ~ ~ 0 U am C ? d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ° ° o a c~ ~ ~ = 0 c0 c~ d a d z L ~ ~ Z i i i i i i ~ ~ lS7 L{7 U ~ ~ a~ C d ~ Q ~ ~ . ~ N ~ ~ W ~ o ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ O li U O O ~ ~ ~ m r o0 ~ £fl Efl 64 ~ ~ t ~_ J ~~" ~ O 0 0 U Q C Z J a z w ~_ 0 w O H 'H'^ VJ H 0 U Z O ~- Z 0 Z O O C7 a J ~; Q f6 N 7 Q N N a ~° Z ~ m ~ ~ ~ C -° v .Q ~ `o ~ o v ~ ~ N Q Q M T N a C O N C O O J O Q ~ ~ N 0 2 N W a O a. ~ W p M N ~ n. Z C .Q ~ O ~ ~ Qw N 7 O 2 w a fA N O ~ e- `m ~ E 7 Z O ~ ~ ro J ~ Q a C 0 v .~ N Q O ~ O O O O O O M ~ 0 L ~ d p. ~ O ~ a z C W L Q r 1 . 1 1 N O N C a .- s Z o O o m ~ o N V ~ v~ ~ to -+ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn C U ~ o N 'a ~ ~ ii ~ ~ ~ N O T f6 a O C .Q ~ ~ c ~' ~ rn 'v ~° m ~ a ~ D '~ N N tU C O O] O O O O O O (D V' M 0 r r G1 N d Z ~ ~ M r 3 Z N N w ~ r .Q fJA 0 0 O °v N O U fA fA ++ Q QI H Q. C l0 .3 ~ ~ O. C ~ `~ m W sn o -p ~ m ~ ~~ O O O O O O O O O O_ O O N O O ~ O O V N 7 h L ~_ J J ~ W ~ O z J a d z_ 0 0 0 U t7 z 0 cZ G z O 'O V J N ~ o ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ C J Q H 0 i Q o ~, ~~ £~ ~a z a~ .Q ~~ L ~ W L ~ N ~ ++ w ~ ~ o a~ `m w' .Q Z J ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ c~ C~ C~ C~ C~ ~ 'S 'S 'S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U C U C U C ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 L d Q ~ 4 ~ - z W ~, .~ a, o i i ~ ~ i i L Z ++ to a ~ ~ U y U ~ ~ cUn ~ .Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W c~ O U o 0 ~ ~ ~ i 0 Z ~. ~ , z ~ i ~ . ~ ~ N ~ tl t i o U C q1 Q ~ . a ~ ~ ~ W cu o ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~°-~ ° ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J J ~ LL ~ 0 0 0 u~ 0 U Q /~ V Z 0 ~_ Z 0 0 Z Z O U H N 0 U _Z LO r Z Z 0 0 a J 0 N Y ~ V ~ O 67 L p C V Z 'c O ~ ~ ~ O . -~ ~ O Q V O ~ ~ ~ U ~~ ~ Q R J ~ rN- o r O N EF? fA EA 7 O S ~ ~ ~ ~ C fA 0 I L d ~ °' p d N N r ~a Z L } G W i C N ~ c0 7 O C. S ~ N ~. ~ ,~ O y m ~ ~ ' a~ w E Z c i O V ~ L O- N ~ O Q- ~ ~ ~ " " .~ c ~ o ~ ~ ~ J - '~ ~ U N ~ ._ ~ Q ~ 0 uS ~ N_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ Q . Q ~ UI O ~ Y .--~ . ~ a ~ Y N .--~ ~ ~ V ~ O C V7 ~ O ~ ~ U L1 ~ ' O C .~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ T N t9 L ~ O N ~ Y ~~ ~ ~ Q N (p N Q V ~ O (N6 ~ ~ ~ ~ fSY V ~ t ~ Q Q d (~ O U d N ' d O d O _ ~ci v ~n cfl (h N N r EA fA EA EA ER EH O L d Q. ~ i I I i i 7 d- Z C w c r I I r r . N p L Q~ Y } r r ~ W Z ~ 0 0 0 0 l0 N In r N r O j U c~ c-A ~r ~s c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'Q ~ o Q m O ~ ~ C 3 O ~ ~- Q O O "a N U ~~ .`.+ O U ~ N O ~ C C } O V ~ ~ O Q ~ oX `- O O EH ~ do dv ~ m N EA ff-? EA N C ~ ~ ~ ti ~ v d Z r N r y 7 Z c Qf W ~ C . r N ~- ~ N ~ O O N o r r y o. 0 U ~r ~i ~» ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ Q ~C ~ ~ ~C ~ L. ~ ~ O ~ ~ - ~ o 0 W ° ~ ° m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a N ~ O ~ O ~ 11. U ~ U ~ O O O O °d r ~ ~ ~.f) O (~ V cp r ~ ~ fA ffl fA fA O 41 ~ 1] L G1 J J ~ u' ~ d 0 V Z J d Q X W z H O U C7 z O H z O Z rO V S~ G N y ~' 0 z Q O Q J ~ Q ~ Q H ffl 0 L ~ ~ ~ O °p 2 a 0 d ~ a N ~ o d z L ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ 2~' ''~^ vR ^~^ i.l. 0 a~ W E z O ~ J ~ ~' ° n o . o ~ ~ ~ I += d? ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N ~ o ~ '''' U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ N ~ ._ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul U N . ~ U Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ o ~ U ~ O O O ' ' CO CO O N r N r M ER Efl Efl ffl Efl Efl L Q i O i I I I i a ~ z c a~ ' w ~ I ~ I I ~ I I 1 ~ I I I ~ , 0 c d W ~ O ~ I ~ I I ~ r z <~ Q I I O I I I I U ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ m Q O N a c~ N O U I I Q I I d~ d ~ w zz W I I N aJ O I U ' C Q ~ 0 ~~ ~ a' ~ W ~ .a ~- Q1 LL Q Opp 0~0 ~ Ct7 O l(') ~ Cfl ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ,d J ~ L L JJ r O 0 0 in 0 U Q /~ V 0 0 c~ u~ a a Q C~ 0 U C7 Z_ 0 z 0 z O ~O V a J N ° ° ° ° ° o o o a o co v cQ ~ o J c~ c~ v~ Q r r r F" ER Efl ff3 fA if? L t. O m J ~~ a ~ O I- 0 ~, =I~I I U N yr y ~ ,~ O `~- U ~ ~ J ~ ~ t 0 0 U Q `o as 0 c 0 0 c~ u~ N H O a w 0 U t7 Z 0 z 0 z O 'O V a J N 0 0 o a o ° ° ° ° ° J o v o v d - a r= i, r- -- ~ r . 0 ~~ ~ L {~ O m J ~~ a ~ O I- 0 v =I~I IU L L ~ ~' o a~ 0 U Q `o as 0 c ITEM NC). 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance 5`~~ City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements, Project No. PW99-11 Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works - CIP Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Steven Beswick, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Project; 2. Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-11, Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements contingent on the City receiving Construction Authorization from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) BACKGROUND: The Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvement Project will widen Pechanga Parkway to its ultimate width from Temecula Parkway to Pechanga Road. This project will include asphalt pavement, curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaped medians, minor drainage facilities, water line, traffic signals and striping for easier access to and from Redhawk, Wolf Creek, and the Pechanga Casino. On April 20, 2006 the City filed a Notice of Determination for the Project with the County Clerk pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act confirming approval of a Negative Declaration for the Project finding that it will not have a significant impact on the environment. Because the project is partially funded with a Federal Lands and Highways Grant it was also necessary to process environmental clearance adhering to the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have reviewed and approved the Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared for the project. The Caltrans Environmental Chief Officer and the Caltrans Project Manager/District Local Assistance Engineer approved the CE on March 29, 2007 and on April 3, 2007, respectively. FHWA approved the CE on April 19, 2007. On October 23, 2007, the City Council adopted Resolutions Nos. 07-88, 07-89 and 07-90 confirming these environmental findings The Plans and Specifications have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. In order to advertise for construction bids, the City must receive Construction Authorization from FHWA. The City has submitted all the required documents to receive this Construction Authorization and we have been told that this project is in line to receive this authorization shortly along with many Federal projects. Approving the plans and Specifications and authorizing staff to solicit construction bids contingent on receiving Construction Authorization from FHWA at this time will allow staff to advertise the project as soon as the Construction Autharizatian is received. This will save the time we would have to wait until the City Council meeting that follows receiving the Construction Authorization. The Plans and Specifications are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $12,451,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pechanga Parkway Phase II Street Improvements Project; Praject No. PW99-11, is a Capital Improvement project funded with Development Impact Fees -Street Improvements, a Pechanga Indian Tribe Contribution, a Public Lands and Highways Grant, Reimbursements from RCWD and Standard Pacific Homes, and the Wolf Creek Community Facilities District. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map and Project Description ro 0 io H ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K ~ N ~x~. y ~ G A b~ ~~ ~. ~, b FOY O ~ n r ~'{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~/ ' la ~ ~ A w a n ~ n w ~ n h rn ~ ry~ ~ G m~ O m ~w.. a ~ ~ (D ~ N h O" P n a ~"~, h r' b a ~ ~ p, m m ~ rn rn 7 7 w i-r w ^ ~ ~ O ti y ~~aticR4 ~~x~g:~K N ry OC N .. ~ypf ~ ~ N C1 ~p P w ~ y. ~ y ~t,~d ww n ~ P O N :p ~r ~ M C x ~~ g~n_~ w ~ ~ :P ~ n YH V o~ o' .~. M ~ ~~~~~s~~ V D A A N «~ A to a A O IJ IJ co ~A o owN~ O ~' O O O J cn ~` O O O vi W A bi H3 ffl b9 (fl fA 4A b 9 b9 ~ In W .- . O w ~O O ~ ~D CO Vi W b' 00 (D O W ~ m d ? ~ W ~ v W A • -• O N O 0o J to IJ 1D A `~ O ~ 0 W O W W N O O , O O O W '-' p .. N w .+ N OO N .-~ N N oo N C ~ ~ A U o O' N N W O J t n ~ 'P O 0 0~ ~ l O 0 0 n ~ ooo~oooo . . m N U' b N O 0 N O. O H N. N. ~ . N.' Vi HifA VS fAFA'fA. Hi .. ~ n~ W OG ,. ,. tJ .+ -N lJ ' ° o '~ +D 00 N In O W O V W O b + "'~' A in O O N N v, O A ~] J C O O lJ A 0 0 " * ~ a oooa~aoo' D to O O O ~7 00 O O N H .' d In b 0 A ~'h Y P b f. ~ ^o a, a' Y' O ~ n• ~ ~. ~ ~ O ^ .. m o~y O ~+ ~ 0 a fD r' ~ O ~~ ~~'o ti N ~ n o~ y ~ ~ O ~, ~ H a. o. ~~ a n' &~ a O N ~: ~ N: ~ (/Q d h A R' O- 00 ~.~ o ~' H O M (o n `D w a " d H O q ~ d a' C N. O ~ a~ P~ ~ ~ O ~o o ~ M ~ `. O ~-n C m a: w `< ~ ~_ ~y a°+ rn ~ a. ~; O O ~~ C~.~ m' ~ ~^ a: ~ ~- a.N~~, ° ~ro w "~ o ro `C M ro ~. n K M t, H i ~7 b 'G ro ],r ~c C a: N (~D M'+ ,. t ITEM NC). 19 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Glenn Patterson, Fire Chief DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: First Amendment To Security Agreement PREPARED BY: Glenn Patterson, Fire Chief RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Approve the First Amendment with Securitas Security Services USA in an additional amount of $14,000.00 for security services at Fire Station 95: 2. Approve the First Amendment with Securitas Security Services USA to include a term extension through March 31, 2008. BACKGROUND: The Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station is not open and operational at this time and the construction schedule indicates the roads and utilities that serve the Fire Station will not be available until some time later this year, which is a delay from the original estimate. As such, the City is still unable to occupy and operate the facility for its intended purpose. In September of 2007 the City entered into a contract with Securitas Security Services USA to provide Security Services at the site due to the value of the facility and the contents within. Because of the delay in opening the station it is necessary that we continue to maintain a level of security throughout this interim period. The Fire Department is in the process of installing a monitored alarm system to mitigate the need for an on duty security officer, but until such time that work is complete we need to amend the security services contract to allow for continued protection until the security system is fully operational. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs associated with the security services forthe Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station is the responsibility of the Developer for the Roripaugh Ranch project area. However, until funds can be recovered from the Developer, adequate funds are available in the Fire Department Operating Budget. Attachments: Agreement FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. For Security Services at Roripaugh Fire Station 95 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of February 26, 2008 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"} and Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. "Contractor". In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes A. On September 1, 2007 the City and Contractor entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Contractor Services between the City of Temecula and Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for Security Services at Roripaugh Fire Station 95 ("Agreement"} in the amount of $30,000.00. B. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to March 31, 2008 and increase the payment for services in the amount of $14,000.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 TERM . This agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks are completed but in no event later than March 31, 2008 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement. 3. Section 5a Payment of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. The first amendment amount shall not exceed Fourteen Thousand Dollars and no cents {$14,000.00} for additional security at the City of Temecula Fire Station 95 for a total agreement amount, of Forty Four Thousand Dollars and no cents. {$44,000.00). 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. p:/Agreement Samples.Amendment.2006 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Securitas Security Services USA Inc. Attn: Nathan Willman, Branch Manager 28999 Old Town Front Street, Suite 206 Temecula, CA 92599 951-676-9624 phone 959-676-3954 fax BY: NAME: TITLE: BY: NAME: TITLE: (Two Signatures Required For Corporations) R:/purchasing,`agreement samples.~lmendment.2006 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM NC). 2d MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FEBRUARY 12, 2008 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:53 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington Comerchero ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 22 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Approve the minutes of January 22, 2008. 23 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to solicit construction bids for Phase 1 of the Temecula Community Center Expansion (Grading), Protect No PW06-05 RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids for the Temecula Community Center Expansion (Grading), Project No. PW06-05. Cansent Calendar Item No. 24 was pulled for separate discussion; see page 2. 24 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit construction bids for the Roller Hockey Rink Dasher Board Replacement Protect PW07-12 RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids for the Roller Hockey Rink Dasher Board Replacement Project PW07- 12. MOTION: Director Washington moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 22 and 23. Director Roberts seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. R:1Minutes1021208 24 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit construction bids far the Roller Hockey Rink Dasher Board Replacement Protect PW07-12 RECOMMENDATION: 24.2 Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids for the Roller Hockey Rink Dasher Board Replacement Project PW07- 12. Director of Community Services Parker provided a staff report {of record). A. Mr. James Cole, representing Temecula Malley lnline Hockey, thanked Director of Community Services Parker, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington, and Mayor Naggar for their efforts with respect to the upgrade to the railer hockey dasher board. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve staff recommendation. Director Roberts seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No report at this time. CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT No additional comments. CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS No additional comments. CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:57 p.m., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 26, 2008, at 5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero. President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] R:1Minutes1021208 2 ITEM NC). 21 Approvals ~Q City Attorney s~~~ Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Shawn Nelson, General Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Approval of 2007-08 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Jason Simpson, Assistant Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET BACKGROUND: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD") operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the TCSD maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, TCSD staff has reviewed the operating budget and has identified any material adjustments required. The mid-year budget review includes the TCSD Citywide Parks and Recreation Fund, five Service Level Funds, and the Debt Service Fund. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances through December 31, 2007: Presents a summary of prior year and FY 2007-08 year-to-date actual activity, as well as FY 2007-08 current and revised budget amounts. Also included is a schedule of beginning and estimated ending fund balances based upon the revised budget activity. Revenue Detail: The projected total TCSD revenues reflect changes from the current budget estimate as follows: Citywide Operations: • A reduction of $92,868 in Citywide revenues due to a reduction of $220,000 in REST which was partially offset by increases in programs revenues for Recreation, Sports, and the Community Theater. The reduction of REST is a result of higher than anticipated fund balances in TCSD Citywide at June 30, 2ao7. Service Level B: • A $60,000 increase in operating transfers in from Citywide operations to fund increased utility costs far Street Lighting. Library: • A $247,217 reduction in overall Library revenues consisting of a $300,000 reduction in REST contribution which was offset by minor revenue category increases totaling $52,783. .The reduction of REST is a result of higher than anticipated fund balances in TCSD Citywide at June 30, 2007. Service Levels C, D, R. L and the Debt Service funds do not require revenue estimate adjustments at this time since it appears that these funds are on pace to meet their projections. Expenditure Detail: A total increase in TCSD expenditures of $59,300 is proposed. Following is a summary of all proposed expenditure adjustments: Citywide Operations: The increase in expenditures of $59,300 is a result of: • Increased utility costs of $181,300 far all facilities and programs Citywide; which staff primarily offset with $182,000 in line-item reductions through-out Citywide programs. • Increase of $60,000 in operating transfers out to Service Level B to fund increase utility costs for Street Lighting. Service Leve! B: • Increase of $60,000 for higher utility costs for Street Lighting. Library: • Increase of $40,000 far higher utility casts. Authorized Positions No position reclassifications ornew positions are proposed. TCSD's current positions are shown in the agenda item separately presented on the City's Mid-Year Budget. There was a minor salary range adjustment to the Human Services/Teen Manager position. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed mid-year adjustments will result in a net decrease in fund balance of $439,385 bringing the TCSD total projected fund balances to $1,188,314 at June 30, 2008. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CSD 08- 2007-08 Temecula Community Services District Mid-Year Budget RESOLUTION NO. CSD 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD} maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Section 2. That each year amid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Community Services (TCSD} operating budget. Section 3. That the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the schedules attached hereto at Exhibit A. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2007-08 TCSD operating budget is amended in accordance with the attached schedules. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Jeff Camerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk/Board Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: Susan W. Janes, MMC City Clerk/Board Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FY2007-08 MIDYEAR BUDGET TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET Total Revenues by Fund: Citywide Operations Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R Service Level L Library Debt Service Total Revenues Total Expenditures by Fund: Citywide Operations Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R Service Level L Library Debt Service Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Operating Transfers In (Out): Citywide Operations Service Level B Debt Service Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balances, Beg. of Year Fund Balances, End of Year ALL TCSD FUNDS ~ COMBINED 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-b~-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Acbaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 10,142,763 11,358,894 5,748,593 11,266,026 (92,868) -1% 618,035 655,259 328,396 655,259 - 0°l0 1,356,808 2,016,870 1,236,191 2,016,870 - 4,811,014 5,331,590 2,741,366 5,331,590 - 10,864 10,461 6,063 10,461 - 162,648 202,000 99,634 202,000 - 1,360,103 1,b09,005 836,494 1,361,788 (247,217) -15% 1,024 - 1,989 - - 18,463,259 21,184,079 10,998,726 20,843,994 (340,085) -16010 9,620,021 11,556,473 5,416,769 11,555,773 (700) 0.0% 663,180 724,335 389,978 784,335 60,000 8010 1,431,674 1,800,224 817,570 1,800,224 - 4,789,911 5,334,708 161,316 5,334,708 - 7,407 6,300 1,698 6,300 - 220,765 261,476 116,746 261,476 - 1,055,910 1,609,005 249,970 1,649,005 40,000 2% 499,050 494,455 379,075 494,455 - 18,287,917 21,786,976 7,533,122 21,886,276 99,300 0% 175,342 (602,897) 3,465,604 (1,042,282) (439,385) -17% (501,500) (494,455) 374,463 (554,455} (60,000) - - - 60,000 b0,000 501,500 494,455 374,463 494,455 - 0% 175,342 (602,897) 3,465,604 (1,042,282) (439,385) -17% 2,055,253 2,230,595 2,230,595 2,230,595 2,230,595 1,627,699 5,696,199 1,188,314 2 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET CITYWIDE FUND 2006-OJ 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuais Budget Actuais Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Tofal Revenues 10,142,763 11,358,894 5,748,593 11,266,026 (92,868) -1% Total Expenditures 9,118,521 11,556,473 5,042,306 11,555,773 (700) 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,024,242 (197,579) 706,287 (289,747) (92,168) 47% Operating Transfers Out (501,500) (494,455) (374,463) (554,455) 60,000 -12% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 522,742 (692,034) 331,824 (544,202) (152,16S) 35°,0 Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 1,331,675 1,352,917 1,352,917 1,352,917 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,554,417 660,SS3 1,634,741 50S,715 3 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET SERVICE LEVEL "B" FUND Total Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Operating Transfers 1n Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendihares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg, of Year Fund Balance, End of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audi~d Current Year-b-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 618,035 655,259 328,396 655,259 - 0°l0 663,180 724,335 389,978 784,335 60,000 8°!0 (45,145) (69,076) (61,582) (129,076) (60,000) -8°l0 60,000 60,000 0% (45,145) (69,076) (61,582) (69,0?b) 161,288 116,143 116,143 116,143 116,143 47,067 54,561 47,067 4 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET SERVICE LEVEL "C" FUND Total Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendibares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed °lo Audited Current Year-b-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals budget Achaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 1,356,808 2,016,870 1,236,191 2,016,870 1,431,674 1,800,224 817,570 1,800,224 (74,866) 216,646 418,621 216,646 162,015 87,149 87,149 87,149 Fund Balance, End of Year 87,149 343,795 505,770 303,795 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET SERVICE LEVEL "D" FUND Total Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendibares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed °lo Audited Current Year-b-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals budget Achaals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 4,811,014 5,331,590 2,741,366 5,331,590 4,789,911 5,334,708 161,316 5,334,708 21,104 (3,118) 2,580,050 (3,118} 10,304 31,408 31,408 31,408 Fund Balance, End of Year 31,408 28,291 2,611,458 28,291 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET SERVICE LEVEL "R" FUND Total Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditrares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 2006-07 2007-03 2007-0$ 2007-OS Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised [na~ease Increase Achaals Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 10,364 10,461 6,06 3 10,461 7,407 6,300 1,69S 6,300 3,457 4,161 4,365 4,161 31,302 34,759 34,759 34,759 Fund Balance, End of Year 34,759 3S,920 39,124 3S,920 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET SERVICE LEVEL "L" FUND Total Reverres Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditrares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg. of Year Fund Balance, End of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-0$ 2007-OS Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Acd.~als Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) 162,648 202,000 99,634 202,000 220,765 261,476 116,746 261,476 (58,117) (59,476) (17,112) (59,476) 351,639 351b39 351,639 351639 293,522 292,163 334,527 292,163 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET LIBRARY FUND Total Revenues Total Expendihrres Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendihares and Operating Transfers Out Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Ach.ials Budget Actuals Budget (Dea~ease) (Decrease) 1,360,103 1,609,005 836,494 1,361,788 (247,217) -15% 1,055,910 1,609,005 249,970 1,649,005 -}0,000 2% 304,193 - 586,524 (237,217) (287,217) -18% 304,193 304,193 30=1,193 Fund Balance, End of Year 304,193 304,193 S90,717 16,976 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET DEBT SERVICE FUND Tofial Revenues Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendihrres Operating Transfer In 2006-07 2007-OS 2007-0$ 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Achrals Budget Achrals Budget (Decrease} (Decrease) (500,476) - - - 499,050 494,455 379,075 494,455 (999,526) (494,455) (379075) (494,455) 501,500 494,455 376,452 494,455 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out (498,026) (2,6 23 ) Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 7,030 (490,996) (490,996) (490,996) Fund Balance, End of Year (490,996) (490,996) (493,619) (490,996) 10 TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL. FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-C~ CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO iS0 TCSD FUND ACTUALS YTD 12 31 7 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHAIJGE DEPT 180 NCN_DEPARTMENTAL 4004 -Special Tax 2,985,206 1,860,881 3,657,684 3,663,817 6,133 0.17% 4051 -Contributions - 25,000 25,250 25,250 - 4060 -Mscellaneous Non Taxable 400 317 300 317 17 5.67% 4065+4545 -Investrr~nt Interest 38,321 21,890 23,900 31,888 7,988 33.42% 4070 -Cash Over & Short (70) - - - - 9073 -TCSD Adrrin Fee Credit/"Rest" 5,553,415 3,059,420 6,118,839 5,898,839 (220,000) -3.60% 4076 -Reirrbursements 45,228 30,662 30,663 30,663 - 4077 -Lease! Incorr~ 37,097 20,243 36,000 39,713 3,713 10.31% 4089 -Reirrbursements (CIP) 14,661 4,310 10,000 5,000 (5,000) -50.00% 4104 -Extenson of Time 3,046 1,972 6,530 3,918 (2,612) -40.00% 4106 -Tract Maps 1,440 - 4,758 1,356 (3,402) -71.50% 4107 -Parcel Maps 862 699 1,314 699 (615) -46.80% 4113 Revi~d Maps - - 2,061 2,061 - 4119 -Development Plan 13,714 4,179 15,258 6,453 (8,805) -57.71% 4121 -Majcx Modification 8,657 2,457 7,870 3,935 (3,935) -50.00% 4123 Specfic Plan - - 30,214 30,214 - 4130 CEQA Environrr~ntal Irrpad Rpt - - 2,535 10,190 7,605 300.00% 4131 Development/Annexation Agmt - 1,766 8,177 8,422 245 3.00% 41~ -Parcel Map/t+Uaiver 419 211 820 211 (609) -74.27% 4139 -condo Tract Map 3,948 - 1,326 663 (663) -50.00% 4151 -Parcel Map Check 1,098 475 - 1,550 1,550 4152 -Tract Map Check 5,229 1,102 5,350 2,140 (3,210) -60.00% 4192 -Specific Flan Arnendrr~nt 850 - 1,700 850 (~0) -50.00% 42~ -Plan Check -Contract - - 3,000 - (3,000) -100.00% 4284 -Plan Check (343) - - - - 4290 -Inspectiai Fees 5,494 - - - - 4291 -Inspectioi Fees - Caitract - - 2,000 - (2,000) -100.00% 4360 -[rrprovementPlan Ck Off-Site 811 364 145 364 219 151.03% 4370 -L~nds~cape Phn Check 2,394 - 5,000 - (5,000) -100.00% 4371 -Landscape Inspection - - 10,000 10,000 - 4373 -Tree Tri mrring/Rerrpval 771 - - - - 43S0 -StreetLighong Fees 12,682 - 4,000 4,000 - 4391 -S ecial A reerrent Fees 4 000 9 000 9 000 TOTAL DEPT 180 8739 330 5035 948 10 023 694 97'91463 232 231 -2.32% DEPT 181 SR. CENTER 4980 -Oasis/Activities 1,212 406 2,000 825 (1,175) -58.?54! 4983 -Trsnsporta6cn 905 453 1,000 1,000 - 4986 -Excursons 1,822 2,359 3,800 4,800 1,000 26 - ~"' 4990 -IndocrRent~Js 23547 11598 20800 21000 200 0,~~6"-6 TOTAL DEPT 181 27 486 14 816 27 600 27 625 25 O. i~~ "-h DEPT 182 CRC 4980 -Oasses/Activities 20,617 6,135 21,000 21,000 - 4984 -Day Carrp 109,075 8,830 - - - 4990 -Indoor Rentals 38 175 16 247 34 000 36 000 2000 5.88% TOTAL DEPT 182 167 867 31 212 55 000 57 000 2000 3.64% DEPT 183 RECREATIC~1 4070 -Case Over & Short 143 6 - - - 4980 -Oas~:s/Activities 2 - - - - 4982 -Contracted Classes 357,917 104,849 310,000 360,000 50,000 16.13% 4989 -Day Carrp - - 100,000 105,000 5,000 5.00% 4985 -Paddle Boat Rent,~s 634 - - - - 4986 -Excursons 10,368 2,058 7,000 4,400 (2,600) -37.14% 4989 -Rcnic Shelter Rent,~s 9,063 3,273 8,000 9,000 1,000 1250';'1= 4992 -Special Events 17,003 9,817 15,000 16,500 1,500 1~5,~5~5''. 4998 -Skate Park 15 759 7 935 13 000 15 500 2500 1'~,~`-"' TOTAL DEPT 183 910 889 127 938 453 000 510 400 57 400 1~' r''' DEPT 184 TCC 4980 -Oasses/Actiwoes 1,158 726 1,000 1,225 225 22.50% 4990 -Indoor Rents 12 418 9 288 12 000 17 700 5700 47.50% TOTAL DEPT 184 13 576 10 014 13 000 18 925 5 925 45.58% TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL. FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE % CLRRENT REVISED IN NO 190 TCSD Fl_ND PCTUaLS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE DEPT 185 MUSELM 4070 -Cash Over & Short - 1 - - - 49~ -Class/Activities 2,015 1,485 - - - 4984 Day Camp - - 3,100 1,885 (1, 215) -39.19% 4985 -Magazines 1,915 1,436 2,000 2,000 - 4989 Picnic Shelter Rentals - - 2,000 - (2,000) -100.00% 4990 -Indoor Rentals 2,612 81 - 500 500 4991 -Mu~um Admissions 18 712 3 192 10 000 5 875 4 125 -41.25°~ TOTAL DEPT 185 25 254 6 195 17 100 10 260 6 840 -40.00% DEPT 186 AQJATICS 49701 -Sn~im Lessons 101,793 48,335 95,000 98,000 3,000 3.16% 4971 -Lap Swim 8,569 3,460 14,400 5,~0 (8,500) -59.03% 4972 -~rblic Swim 321 6b - 66 66 4973 -Family Night Swim 215 iC8 - 108 108 4974 -Pool Rentals 21,975 1,825 28,500 24,500 (4,000) -14.04% 4976 -Non-resident Swim 8562 5 815 7 000 8500 1 500 21.4385 TOTAL DEPT 186 141 435 59 609 144 900 137 074 7 826 -5.40% DEPT 187 SPORTS 4960 -PdultSoftball 64,790 42,400 65,200 74,200 9,000 13.80% 4961 -Adult Basketball - 1,2A - 1,800 1,800 4963 -Torrnaments 51,249 34,648 60,000 60,000 - 4964 -Adult Leagues (non-resident) 7,845 4,870 2,800 6,250 3,450 123.21% 4965 -Youth Leagues (non-resident) 2,145 5,870 1,500 10,300 8,800 586.6755 4966 -Open Gym 1,425 661 1,000 1,200 200 20.00% 4988 -Field RentalsJLights 59,642 39,634 54,000 61,000 7,000 12.96% 4997 -S orts Concessions - 5 762 15 600 15600 - TOTAL DEPT 187 187 096 135 135 200 100 230 350 30.250 15.12% DEPT 188 CHILDREN'S MUSELM 4070 -Cash Over & Short (18) - - - - 4987 -Memberships 3 6 - - - 4991 -Mu~um Admissions 109 501 47 459 102 000 95 000 7 000 -6.86% TOTAL DEPT 188 109 486 47 465 102 000 95 000 7 000 -6.86% DEPT 189 CC~IMLNITY THEATER 4051 -nations 2,042 1,000 500 2,000 1,500 300.00% 4070 -Cash Over & Short - (30) - - - 4900 -Theater Security - 429 - 429 429 4901 -Theater Ushers 13,017 7,619 7,000 15,500 8,500 121.43% 4906 -Theater -Stagehand Labor Reimb 75,431 51,959 65,000 92,000 27,000 41.54% 4907 -Theater -Ticket Services Reimb 64,622 36,8 60,000 68,000 8,000 13.33% 4990 -Theater Rentals 73,104 39,144 55,000 73,000 18,000 32.73% 4991 -Theater Admissions 57,903 134,260 115,000 115,000 - 4997 -Concessions 1,747 41 9,000 1,000 (8,000) -88.89% 4999 -Theater-E ui ment Rentals 14 121 7 648 4 000 14 000 10 000 250.00°~ TOTAL DEPT 189 301 987 278 966 315 500 380 929 65 429 20.74% DEPT 190 CLITLRPL ARTS 49~ -Clasps/Activities 8,455 720 5,000 5,000 - 4981 -Film Festival 475 - - - - 4982 -Contracted Classes 7,303 - - - - 4992 -S ecial Events 2 123 575 2 000 2000 - TOTAL DEPT 190 18 356 1 295 7 000 7000 - TOTAL TCSD 10.142 763 5 748 593 11 358 894 11 266 026 92 868 -0.82% TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL. FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-OS CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 192 SERVICE LEVEL "B" FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 1 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4005 -Assessments 604,437 327,305 640,459 640,459 - 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 2,942 375 2,000 2,000 - 4090 -Operating Transfers In - - - 60,000 60,000 4390 -SireetLightng Fees 10656 264 12,000 12,000 - 4395 -Pro er Owner Election Costs - 452 S00 S00 - TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL "B" FUVD 618 35 328 396 655 259 715 259 60 000 9.16% ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-03 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 193 SERVICE LEVEL "C" FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 1 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATI=S ESTIMATES CHANGE 4005 -Assessments 1,344,442 793,369 1,579,557 1,579,857 - 4073 -TCSD Admn Fee Credit/"Rest' - 415,242 415,242 415,242 - 4065+4545 -Investment interest 2,614 633 - - - 4076 -Reimbursements - 8,559 - - - 420S -Plan Check - Caitract 600 - 6,000 6,000 - 4291 -Inspection Fees -Contract 7,500 3,750 4,000 4,000 - 4370 -Landscape Plan Check - 6,656 2,509 2,509 - 4371 -Landscape Inspection 1652 7,500 3,462 3,462 - 4391 -Special Agreement Fees - - 5,000 5,000 - 4395 -Pro er Owner Election Costs - 452 S00 S00 - TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL "C" FUND 1 356 803 1236 191 2 16 0 2 16 S70 - ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-OS FY 07-OS FY07-OS CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 194 SERVICE LEVEL "D" FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12,'31 '07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4005 -Assesstents 4,765,072 2,712,761 5,297,623 5,297,628 - 4025 -Grants 211841 24,962 24,962 24,962 - 4063 -Concessions - - 4000 4,000 - 4065+4545 -Investrnent Interest 19,151 3,594 - - - 4096 -Rec clip Pro ram 5 00 49 5 000 5 00 - TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL "D" FUND 4 811 14 2 741 366 5 331 590 5 331 590 - ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-OS FY07-03 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 195 SERVICE LEVEL "R" FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4005 -Assessments 9,486 5,384 10,061 10,061 - 4063 -Concessons - - 400 400 - 4065+4545 -Investrnent Interest 1 37S 679 - - - TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL 12" FUND 10 S64 6 063 10 461 10 461 - TEMEGULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL. FY2007-2008 -MID YEAR BUDGET ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-0$ CHANGE °lo CURRENT REVISED IN NO 196 SERVICE LEVEL "L" FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMAl1=S CHANGE 4005 -Assessrnents 14S,958 93,481 200,000 200,000 - 4007 -Harveston Lake Boat Revenue 1,636 1,302 2,000 2,000 - 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 12 054 4 851 - - - TOTAL SERVICE LEVEL "L" FUND 162 648 99 634 202 00 202 00 - ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-03 FY 07-05 FY07-OS CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 197 LIBRARY FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 18,218 25,239 3,000 42,237 39,237 1307.90°l0 4070 -Cash Over & Short 135 214 - - - 4073 -TCSD Admn Fee Credit/REST 1,275,439 739,002 1,47S,005 1,178,005 (300,000) -20.30% 4271 -Files & Fees 45,126 46,025 70,000 93,288 23,288 33.27% 4272 -Lost Damaged Materials 1,383 2,452 1,500 5,300 3,800 253.33% 4273 -Printing & Copies 9,941 10,001 15,000 20,175 2,175 12.08% 4274 -Facilities Rentals 9,861 9,903 24,500 19,125 (5,375) -21.94% 4997 -Librar Concessions - 3 658 14 000 3 53 10 342 -73.87°io TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 1 360 103 836 494 1609 005 1 361 788 247 217 -15.36% ACCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHANGE CURRENT REVISED IN NO 390 DEBT SERVICE FUND ACTUALS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHANGE 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 1,024 1,959 - - - 4090 - eratin Transfer in 501 500 374 463 494 455 494 455 - TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 502 524 376 -152 494 455 494 455 - DISTRICT BUSINESS ITEM NC). 22 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Temecula Youth Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve in its substantial form the Temecula Youth Master Plan. BACKGROUND: Recognizing the challenges facing today's youth in Temecula, the Board of Directors and the Temecula Valley Unified School District embarked on the development of a comprehensive, strategic plan to assess the needs and desires of young people in our community. The Temecula Youth Master Plan contains a variety of input, suggestions and proposals received from the community to address the needs of our youth. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to MIG to work with the City and the community in the development of the Temecula Youth Master Plan. Through a series of individual interviews with key stakeholders, focus groups that included representatives from both public and private schools, non- profit organizations, faith based organizations, community and civic leaders, as well as intercept surveys, Internet surveys and two well attended community workshops, input was gathered from the community at large. Our consultant also worked closely with an adult steering committee representing a large segment of our community, and a youth steering committee consisting of young adults with interest in the development of the plan. With input from the steering committees, and the information gathered from the community, our consultant MIG developed a vision statement, values, outcomes and a strategic direction, which formed the framework of the Temecula Youth Master Plan. The vision statement was developed from input from both the adult and youth steering committees and focused on a broad statement as follows "Temecula's youth are valued as the future of our community. We provide an exciting, positive and supportive environment with a wide range of choices and opportunities that challenge our youth with new experiences. We develop our youth through awell-balanced approach that fosters intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, physical and emotional growth. Our young people enjoy their youth, and achieve lifelong success as Temecula's adults of tomorrow. Values identified through the process included safety, family orientation, education, and activities. Outcomes that were identified include youth safety, prepared youth, engaging youth, strong families and communities, shared respect, happy and healthy youth. In addition, the main key points identified as our strategic direction of the plan include public and private partnerships, organized activities, the development of additional communityfacilities, safetyand safe environments, respect and understanding in youth/adult relationships, life and job skills, transportation access for youth, and public information and oversight to keep our youth and community members informed, all of these elements express the desires of our community and the direction for the Youth Master Plan. It is envisioned that the plan would be a used as a guide to assist the City of Temecula and its private and non-profit organizations throughautthe community, in addressing the needs of our youth far years to come. Tonight Mr. Andy Pendoley and Ms. Esmeralda Garcia of MIG are here to present an overview of the Temecula Youth Master Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost associated with the development of the Temecula Youth Master Plan was budgeted in FY2006-2007 operating budget in the amount of $67,000, including contingency and was carried over to FY2007-2008 to complete the development of the document. •n.i J ~a ,~ ~ ~`~ VALUING temecula's TODAY AND TOMORROW DRAFT city of temecula community services department vALIJING TEMECIJLA'S YCJUTH TODAY AND TCJM~RRC~vv creating a vision far the future DRAFT YOUTH MASTER PLAN 169 Noah Marengi, ;;venue Pasadena, CA 91101 626 744 9873 www.migcom.com Sally McIntyre, Principal-in-Charge Esmeralda Garcia, Director Andy Pendoley, Project Manager Bowen Patterson, Project Associate February 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City Council Mike Naggar, Mayor Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro tem Jeff Comerchero, Council Member Ron Roberts, Council Member Chuck Washington, Council Member Community Services Commission Felicia Hogan, Chairman Tom Edwards, Vice Chair Charolette Fox, Commissioner Michael McCracken, Commissioner Jim Meyler, Commissioner School Board Trustees Stewart Morris, President Richard Shafer, Clerk Bob Brown, Member Vincent O'Neal, Member Barbara Tooker, Member City Staff Shawn Nelson, City Manager Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services Adult Steering Committee Members Mike Naggar, Mayor Chuck Washington, Council Member Felicia Hogan, Community Services Commission Chairman Tom Edwards, Community Sevices Commission Vice Chairman Dr. Carol Leighty, TVUSD Superintendent Stu Morris, School Board Trustee Barbara Tooker, School Board Trustee Shawn Nelson, City Manager Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager Herman Parker, Director of Community Services Phyllis Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator Julie Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent Martin Betz, Cultural Arts Administrator Jerry Williams, Chief of Police Terry Meadows, Lieutenant, Temecula Police Department Michelle Arellano, Boys and Girls Club President Bill Gould, President, Full Value Entertainment Adult Steering Committee Members, cont. Diana Daman-White, Temecula Valley Unified School District Scott Schaufele, Temecula Valley Unified School District Melissa Donaldson, Safe Alternatives For Everyone (S.A.F.E.) Leah DiBernardo, Delytes Jim Morgan, YMCA Director Gary Tidwell, YMCA Board Member Corinne Daly, representing County Supervisor Jeff Stone Scott Treadway, Rancho Community Church Rocky Hill, Hill Counseling Center Youth Steering Committee Members Ryan Shank, Temecula Teen Council Kelsey Winslow, Temecula Teen Council Kevin Taylor, Safe Alternatives For Everyone (S.A.FE.) Daniel Pennington, S.A.F.E. Sean Sopha, S.A.F.E. Jennifer Gonzales, S.A.F.E. Zachary Shirey, S.A.F.E. Luis Rivera, Police Explorer Scouts Cynthia Ibarra, Police Explorer Scouts Anthony Post, Police Explorer Scouts Michael Loesching, Police Explorer Scouts Amanda Viselli, Boys and Girls Club Kendyl Ryan, Boys and Girls Club Jourdan Sales, Temecula resident DRAFT temecula youth master plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Why a Youth Master Plan? Planning Process Overview Organization of the Plan 1 2 5 CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAMEWORK Definitions 7 Illustrated Strategic Plan Framework 8 Strategic Framework 8 CHAPTER THREE: STRATEGIES AND ACTION PLAN Public-Private Partnerships 13 Organized Activities 13 Community Facilities 14 Safety 15 Respect and Understanding 16 Life and Job Skills 17 Transportation Access 18 Public Information and Oversight 18 CHAPTER FOUR: IMPLEMENTATION Recreation Facility Feasibility Study 19 Staffing Needs 19 Potential Funding Methods 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY 25 APPENDICES 1. Environmental Scan Summary 2. Community Meetings and Interviews 3. Youth Questionnaire 4. Adult Questionnaire ` ~~ ~ i ntroducti can _ .~ CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION cnapter one: Introauctlon THE Cll"Y OF TEMECULA is located at the southern-most end of Riverside County, within commuting distance from San Diego; San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. The City is home to almost 98;000 residents, many of them military families from the nearby Marine Corps, Air Force, and Naval bases. The area features a relatively affordable housing stock, which has been a major draw for new residents wanting Ternecula's youfh and fhe broader a better environment in which to raise a family. Since 1989 the city's popul~.:ic;rl has grown by over 350 percent. The City is known for activities including dirtbikingloffroading, hot air balloon rides, golf, nearby wineries; and the Pechanga Resort and Casino. Because the City is relatively safe and affordable, it provides a nurturing, famify- communify to friendly environment for youth and teens. However, the community has develop new ideas to encountered challenges in providing the productive and healthy activities and make Temecula a long-term support that their youth and teens might want. The community has seen an increase in youth and teen drug and alcohol abuse, gang activity, beffer place far y©ctfh violence; and other problems concerning young people. and feenS. To address these needs; the City engaged Temecula's youth and the broader community in a strategic planning process to develop new ideas for how the entire community could work together to make Temecula a better place for youth and teens both today and for generations to came. This resulting Youth Master Plan is based on cartmiunity input and strategic discussion abeut youth-oriented activities, facilities; programs; partnerships, and more that can improve life for Temecula's young people. WHY A YOUTH MASTER PLAN? Recognizing the problems and challenges facing today's young Temecula residents, the City Council, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Unified DRAFT TEMECULA 1`OUTH MASTER PLAN I 1 The Crty engaged CHAPTER ONE' INTRODUCTION School District, and the community at large charged the City Community Services Department with developing acommunity-based plan for Temecula's youth. Throughout the planning process, participants recognized a variety of reasons for engaging in such a process: Provide youth with opportunities to communicate their visions, challenges and ideas to civic leaders and the entire community. Support an increasing diversity of needs and interests among its young people - a diversity that grows along with the population. Maintain the city's family-friendly atmosphere and the resulting benefits that are enjoyed by all community members. Provide more opportunities far youth to be active and engaged in the community. Inspire, involve, coordinate and build partnerships among civic and community leaders who value and serve youth. These reasons together called for an in-depth look at the environment facing the community's youth and teens, including developing a better understanding of what youth and teens need and want out of their community. Additionally, this necessitated involving parents, guardians, teachers, youth-serving organizations, and many other community members to understand how the community could better support youth and teens. PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW The Temecula Youth Master Plan process integrated a strategic process with the input of a wide variety of stakeholders and community members, A Steering Committee and a Youth Advisory Committee helped to guide the planning process. These committees reflected a diverse group of youth interests and experiences, educational institutions, youth organizations, private businesses, cultural facilities, and others. City staff also met frequently to coordinate and advance the planning process. The Temecula Youth Master Plan process was crafted to integrate a strategic process with the input of a wide variety of stakeholders and community members. 2 DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Environmental Scan ~~ Plan Development ~ Plan Approval Phase 1 Phase II Phase III P1ar~r~it~g Process Planning Process The process to create the Temecula Youth Master Plan spanned a 12-month period over three phases: + Phase I: Environmental Scan Phase II: Plan Development + Phase III: Plan Approval Phase I Phase I focused on soliciting input and feedback from the community ai large. Youth, adults, civic leaders and service providers responded to questions about values, challenges, needs, and opportunities, all of which contributed to a clearer understanding of what the community needs for its youth. A summary of these outreach activities and the results are included in the Environmental Scan Summary in the Appendices. Phase II Phase II built on the findings from the previous phase to build the strategic framework, which involved developing the community's vision, values, desired outcomes, and strategic directions. Phase III The Draft Youth Master Plan received final review by the Committees, followed by presentations to the City of Temecula Community Services Commission and the Board of Trustees of the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The City Council received and approved the Final Youth Master Plan. Activities Over 1,200 youth community members and agency representatives were involved in the development of the Temecula Youth Master Plan. Community involvement activities included: DRAFT TEh4ECULA YOUTH Iv1ASTER PLAN I 3 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Youth Advisory Committee The Youth Advisory Committee represented youth from a variety of backgrounds and experiences. The Committee played an important key role in the creation of the vision statement, goals, other elements of the strategic framework, and the final strategies over the course of four meetings. The Committee also reviewed and gave input on environmental scan results anti other products during the planning process. Theirwork helped to ensure that the Plan accurately reflects and incorporates the needs of youth, and that the Plan is easily understood by youth. Steering Committee The Steering Committee included civic leaders, representatives of youth-serving organizations, educators, public safety officers, and other stakeholders. This group met to review and refine the vision, goals, and other elements of the strategic framework, and provided guidance and recornmendationsfnr all environmental scan results and final strategies over the course of five meetings. Meetings of the Youth Advisory and Steering Committees were strategically planned to get the most out of joint and separate sessions, and to allow the Youth Advisory Committee participants to personally share their thoughts and conclusions with the Steering Committee. Focus Groups Five youth and nine adult focus groups met with project team members to share their perspectives about community assets, challenges, and opportunities for positive change. Youth focus group:. were formed from select schools and youth-serving organization.:, including Temecula Valley High School, Rancho Vista School, S?1FE, and the Teen Council. Adult focus groups included representatives of youth-oriented social service agencies and other organizations, administrators from local public and private schools, law enforcement; the business community, and other adults with a significant stake in the lives of Temecula's youth. Stakeholder Interviews The project team conducted a total of eleven stakeholder interviews, asking key civic leaders to provide their perspectives about the community's needs and assets for youth development. Participants included key community leaders, including school administrators, elected officials, and business owners. 4 I DRAFTTEh4ECULAYOUTH Iv1ASTER PLAN CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Community Workshops Twa community workshops were attended by aver 200 people. Participants The work of the learned about the planning process, key findings and provided valuable input about community assets, opportunities, and priority strategies. Youth Advisory Project Team Committee helped to City staff from the Community Services Department and other City departments ensure that the plan met regularly with the consultants to guide the planning process, to establish a accurately reflects public outreach program, and to coordinate planning activities. and incorporates the Youth and Adult Questionnaires needs of youth and A total of 753 yeuth and 338 adults completed a community questionnaire that probed the community's opinion about assets, challenges and opportunities for that the Plan is easily positive youth development in Temecula. The two versions of the UnderSfOOd 6y youth. questionnaire~ne for youth, and one for adults-were made available via the Internet orthrough a paper version distributed throughout the community. The data was analyzed to assess needs. ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN The remainder of the Youth Master Plan document consists of the following chapters: Chapter II: Planning Framework This chapter provides an overview of the plan's strategic framework, including the community's vision, goals, and strategic directions. This section also describes each strategic direction, explains terms used, and provides a visual illustration of the strategic framework. Chapter I11: Strategies and Action Plan This chapter describes the recommended strategies and actions that will be implemented by the City and others to make the City of Temecula a better place for youth and teens. Description of the strategies includes possible partnerships, timelines, and current initiatives related to that action. Chapter IV: Implementation This chapter describes additional costs to the City to implement the next steps of the Youth Master Plan. As strategies are implemented and additional research completed, more funding will be needed. Potential funding sources that may be used to implement strategies in the future are identified, DRAFT TEMECULAYOUTH MASTER PLAN I 5 CHAPTER ONE' INTRODUCTION Appendices The appendices describe the results of the public involvement process, including the Environmental Scan, Community Meetings and Interviews, Youth Questionnaire, and Adult Questionnaire. 6 ~ DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN tanning framework ~ ~' ~ .- ~`' CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAIv1EWORK chapter two: planning framework BEFORE ESTABLISHING FINAL STRATEGIES, the Commitees, planning team and stakeholders established a strategic framework for the Youth Master Plan outlining the community's vision, values, and desired outcomes. From this input, the planning team established strategic directions to guide the creation of strategies and specific recommended actions. Input for these elements came from all environmental scan activities described in Chapter One. The Youth Master Plan strategic framework is presented in this chapter. Its elements are defined below and illustrated on page 8. The Sfeet7ng DEFINITIONS Commiffee and The elements of the strategic framework include: Youfh Advisory vision Commiffee shaped a The vision describes the community's desired direction for the future of vision fhaf describes Temecula's youth. how fhe communify values Values express what the population sees as important qualities of life in their freafs and values community and what they hold true about their environment. youfh and how if wi!! Outcomes ensure (heir persona! Outcomes describe the indirect results of implementing a plan, which assist in SUCCeSS atld achieving the vision, happiness both Today Strategic Directions and it7fo fhe fufure. Strategic directions are areas within which the community will focus their efforts to improve life for the community's youth and teens. DRAFT TEIv1ECULA YQUTH Iv1ASTER PLAN I 7 CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAIv1EWORK TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN STRATEGIC PLAN FRAMEWORK VISION Temecula's youth are valued as the future of our community. We provide an exciting, positive and supportive environment with a wide range of choices and opportunities that challenge our youth with new experiences. We develop our youth through awell-balanced approach that fosters intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, physical and emotional growth. Our young people enjoy their youth, and achieve lifelong success as Temecula's adults of tomorrow. VALUES - -. OUTCOMES Strong Prepared Engaged Shared Happy and Safe Youth Families and Youth Youth Respect Healthy Youth Communities STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS Public-Private Partnerships Safety Transportation Access Organized Activities Respect and Understanding Public Information and in Youth-Adult Relationships Oversight Community Facilities Life and Job Skills Strategies Strategies define how the City will achieve its outcomes and vision. These strategies are complemented by more detailed information regarding partnerships, timeline, resource needs, and current initiatives. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK The Youth Advisory Committee and the Steering Committee shaped a vision that describes how the community treats and values youth. Implementing this plan will foster their personal success and happiness both today and into the future. This vision is supported by the community's articulated values -together these elements establish a foundation for the strategies in this Plan. 8 I DRAFTTEh4ECULAYOUTH Iv1ASTER PLAN CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAIv1EV1.'ORK ~/ISIC~N V(E~ ~I'-1MVNR''f ~ ~' $~~M'c ~6kJ~SIBL~ ~}Ellr~,~~ r~v-c~-.,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~N '~ RSkr - Gi U,o.li YO~JR•I T~ TlZ`~`L"~ -'.~ ~~~~ Ctrl -T~.rEIR o~NN CJ~?~ 'Qo ~ T' --~U,~ ~K~ Vision The following vision for Temecula's youth was crafted with input from both youth and adult participants: Temecuta's youth are valued as the future of our community. We provide are exciting, positive and scrpportive environment with a wide range of choices and opportunities that chaJtenge our youth with new experiences. We develop our youth through a weit- balanced approach that fosters intellectual, soda! spiritual, creative, physical, and emotional growth. Our young people enJoy their youth, and achieve lifelong scrccess as Temecuta's adutfs of tomorrow. '~ ~,. ~p~E~ '~' ~~ /~-~ I This vision statement incorporates the community's wish to `~b11'f~l V~~wl.IT 'f~S"~Y~ provide a fun, healthy, active, safe, and productive environment Youth Advisory Committee Meeting #2 for youth and teens. The community also will support the personal, intellectual, and professional development of youth and teens of all backgrounds and experiences. Values The values expressed here are the qualities of the Temecula community that make it a positive place for youth and teens. These values are embodied in the outcomes and strategies of this Plan. Safety - We feel comfortable engaging in and traveling to exciting, healthy activities in our community. We feel safe from gang behavior, violence, and drug and alcohol abuse. Family-oriented -Our city is a positive place for families to live and thrive, and for our youth to grow. We offer a range of amenities and a close-knit environment that supports family life. Education -Our education professionals and facilities are among the best, and our students are high-performing. Active -Whether recreation, community affairs, or other activities, our community members are active and involved in community life. Faith-oriented -Our community offers a range of options for worship that provide an important support mechanism for our community members. DRAFT TEIv1ECULA YOUTH h+IASTER PLAN I 9 CHAPTERTUVO, PLANNING FRAIv1EVVORK Outcomes These outcomes will result from implementing the Youth Master Plan: Safe Youth -Youth are protected from gang behavior, violence, and drug and alcohol abuse, and feel safe traveling around the City. Prepared Youth -Youth have an increased understanding about the complexities of and strategies for managing the transition to adulthood. Engaged Youth -Youth are connected to community life and their peers, and have opportunities to make meaningful contributions. Strong Families and Communities -Quality of life improves for all community members -particularly families, who are supported by the entire community. Shared Respect -Youth and adults are mutually respectful, understanding and supportive of each others' needs and challenges. Happy and Healthy Youth -Youth are happier and healthier because they are Temecula residents. Strategic Directions The strategic directions outline the major categories of actions for achieving the community's vision and desired outcomes. They are based on major themes that emerged during the environmental scan process. They developed with input from the community, stakeholders, the Youth Advisory and Steering Committees, and Community Services Department staff. Each strategic direction has associated strategies, which are provided in Chapter 3. Public-Private Partnerships -Develop collaborative efforts with local businesses, puL~tic officials, schools, faith-Based organizafons, parent groups, and other related individuals and organizations to provide organized acfivifies and facilities for youth. The Temecula community recognizes the need for new collaborations and partnerships between the City, private businesses, and the multitude of local youth-oriented organizations and programs. Working together, these groups are more likely to find the necessary resources, to think of more creative solutions to problems, and to garner community support for projects and programs that help youth and teens. Youfh are col~l~ecfed fo communlfy !!fe ar~d fhelr peers, anc! have opporful~lfles fo make meaningfu! confrlb uflons. 10 ~ DRAFT TEIv1ECULA YOUTH fv1ASTER PLAN CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAMEWORK Organized Activities -Offer organized activities, athletic opportunities, services, and classes geared toward youth of alt ages and abilities that change with youths' evolving interests and that inspire new levels of youth collaboration across interests and cultures. One of the mast common concerns voiced by the youth participants was boredom and a general lack of things to do. Many requested organized activities; such as festivals, game nights, sports leagues, and a variety of other specific programs. Likewise, adult participants often expressed concerns about youth and teens just "hanging out and getting into trouble," and suggested expanding organized activities as a key solution. Community Facilities -Create community centers and other spaces through youth involvement that provide opportunities for youth activities and creative expression, and are safe places to "hang out." Through the environmental scan process, youth and adult participants identified a need for flexible, multi-use spaces that could house special events and ongoing activities for youth and teens. Participants also expressed a need for more youth- oriented businesses and other public spaces to "hang out." Safety - Create a safer environment for youth to feel comfortable engaging in and traveling to exciting, healthy activities, and address the prevalence of drug and alcohol access and abuse. The community is particularly concerned about increasing trends in youth and teen substance abuse and other unhealthy activities, and wants to emphasize healthy lifestyles and overall safety. By providing rehabilitation services for young drug abusers, expanding preventative services, and stemming local gang violence, the community wants to provide a safer environment for youth. Respect and Understanding in Youth-Adult Relationships -Bridge cultural and generational gaps with new levels of communication and engagement between youth and adults -including civic leaders and law enforcement - to foster closer and more respectful relationships and enhanced understanding about concerns, laws and authority. Youth and teens expressed frustration about the strict enforcement of laws and rules by police and security officers that limit their fun and choices in the community. Public safety officials also expressed frustration that youth and teens don't appreciate the importance of maintaining public safety. Youth and DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN 11 CHAPTER TWO: PLANNING FRAMEWORK adults also reported strained relationships between youth and parents, teachers, and other adult figures. Therefore, stakeholders indicated a need for stronger, more understanding relationships and greater respect between youth and adults. Life and Job Skills - Offer a wide range of fob and life skills training - includingfobs, internships, interview skills, etiquette, resume writing, and technical ski!!s -for youth of a!! education levels, career tracks, and abilities. Both youth and adult participants expressed a need for greater opportunities, training, and support far youth and teens of all ages in the job market. Whether summer, after-school, or post-high school jobs, youth and teens in Temecula would like to have more job options and more support in finding a suitable position. They would also like more guidance and resources in both academic and general life skills, including college applications, vocational training, and living on their own. Transportation Access -Provide affordable, safe, and reliable transportation between residential areas and popular youth destinations such as community centers, movie theatres, restaurants, and other hang outs. The spread out, single-family residential nature of development in Temecula makes it particularly difficult for youth to get to activities at locations outside of their neighborhoods. This problem is compounded by a lack of public transportation options. Public Information and Oversight -Inform youth and community members about youth opportunities in Temecula and provide oversight to ensure Plan implementation. To ensure that the Youth Master Plan is implemented, the City will hire a Human Services Manager to provide ongoing oversight and continue to work with youth and adult advisory groups. In addition, the City will implement outreach efforts to inform youth about activities and opportunities. 12 DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN strategies and actions tV' a ,'~.+ O } m C ~ N ~ ~ Q O Ti G! v ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ U ~ ~ N ~ o ~ W U LL ~ z C CE ~ m ~ w y c c yL-+ (n N ~ ~ w ~ W a ~ r ~ L U ~ m O V O v N a v O N c~ l 0 v F N 1 t Y d A a m Y a U 3 a N c z H. m a ~r y+ a` R - L v A -a J ~ d N c 0 i O w O a O N 3 c Ct s t h N N N h ,-c. °. 3 ~3 ti U ~_ *n N .q b h N m O '~.. O U 3 4 b N m V ~i h .a Q O s m N .' ro a N C% 4 Q h N N »~ d ~ a+ } ~? i- u ~, Q ~ 4 d ~ N C ._ ._ ~ ~ ~ o O °m o o ~ v °~ °i t O 9 C m O `O c a i .~ "v v, " m N CI LL _ - ~ ~ o E _ 'w ?^ ~ W ~ m ~ ~ m c qy C a ~ 3 ~ ' ~ ~ v ~ m ° ~ s ~ c O 1" "' N v m O y ] i 4 C 91 ~ ] u to c ~ m m m u + U a `'~' u+ c a Q W i 3 D q ,, N ~ t i a i ° ~ v m ` ~ U LL ~ V U F- 4 N m O F I Y w m ;~ y % ~ v ~ E > E > Rnl~ o ~ ~ ~a m r aai r} v F Vi ~ ~ (n N Ul L N G ~ O 'C ~p N ~ 'C O a C N i" va N N m m t a ~ ^ ~ ai ~ ^y Q ~ cvi a ~ u ~ c ~ u ~ C ~" o R N 9 ~` ~ ti ~~ ~ ~' N ~ d r v. - ~ ^ O n N v u Y - w ~ d c c >> v m ° ro v ~ c ~ a a v D ~ 0 ~ ~' 9^ 3 m ~ a R E E a "~ c ~ E m a W ~ o¢ c ,- v Q o' 9 i J U o o U U v o ~ o N LL fLt d U Q o o " ~ UJ d !~ (n } v U d f~ ~ .s.. ~ .o C ~ ~ ~ s N ~. al ~° - v, O O ,a v U v t v a c ~ o U a c m N ~ ` _ m ~ a o o G v E L ~ o a .'~' o m ~ ~ E o U ° p . ~ OU U w ° . m csi m ~ v E .. 'c o c o 7 , ~ ~ ~ a. ~ o m c m =~ ° a ~ c - ~ _c ~ ~ a, u 4. o C a a yo, u N n v s E m v v ~ o y a U c m w N a o ~ a a c ~ c U C m - C y t ~ a c G ~ O t t ~ o - O J ~ 2 y ~ a ~ ~ m ~ "> ,- m - .U w a i 4" ~C~ ~ ~i R ~ P 3 = O _ rJ A i O- N ~ OJ C 4 iT _ N ~ o ~ Q (6 ~? U C ~ a "? v% 3 N "~ nOj m ~ a rn C ~ `m v '~ C' O ~ o. •C ~, i4 0 ~ a s T~ v m ~ .J - O ~ 4 ~ a a ~ _ "3 '~ - 1Q > U a i4 dl ~ ~ ~ ~ a °J fp C E ~ l6 U 3 S N O ~ ~ N r ~ m a m L OI ~ o m - ~ - a m c v ~ o ° _ w m m c~ = ~ ~ _ O N .Y N N T ~ ~ v v dJ i1 m a '[ ~+ ~ m m a r m a ~° c o ~ p1 ~ E~ 3 o m u m v. a ~ ~ ~_ U « ~ ~ ° o rr- u a+ m " ~ a o o T m C ~ T E a _ r = ~ O ~ m ~ o c - v a ¢ a c m v fl. m ~ N N v ~ m O N O O O o O O O a J O ~ ~ .. N o ~ N ~ o ~ N o ~ o v o a O c QJ dJ ~ ~ ... m N .o ~ ~ c O. ~ ~+ ~ fb ~ U O ~ L a N Q a Q U ~ v 9- a :? m ~, m o ~ E ~ m o m c i N c m m o (b o W = ~ ~ N ~ U m O s v N j, ~ ~ o ~ ~ p ~ ~ 1 o j ~ v m v v a a a v v a a m v v m a v a s a E o _2 u O N ~ O a o a a O O a a m ~ a U O O_ O ~ s a` ¢ 'WS a c~ m Q m ~ n ~ c g ~ ~ m ~ ~ u y N N N z a U Q J r L U °J m ~ m u a w y Q>~ ~' m rn v v t ~ U U ~ m m ~ a m N L ~ ~ Y K o - R M U a~ N O ~ m ~ N .= _ N - - ° ~ ~ m ~ m t F O d O N %. =o F O m v ~ ~ P v ~ t f1 U F ~ N.~ m v. m > ~ Ct v ~ >, ~ ~~ <.~ o - m ~ .~ o Fin F ~ m ~ -' ~ ~ f lA ~ J (!7 lA ~ ~ L N ~ a N ~ m t dJ F m c m ~ o a m c m ~ a a ~ o ~' C :~ (n a' G O UJ _ ~G F`O' G O UI S t U ~ 4 O - +- ~ ~ .~^ - O ~3 N _~ ~ 3 O . A ~ vii ~ ~. °' o ~ r j o f v- F a s 6. v ., ~ d a o a~ ` ~,~ v o~~ o' ~~ a m o v s o ~ a v ~ ;° u z a LL a; U v z u. v rn U z . a m m '~ m m ~ a, Y m ~ N p a m `a >' .y c ~' m u, O a U ~ w ~ V ~ O o a ~ N c N ~ ~ m ° ~ N - ~ U c 6 m ~ m o ~ o .~ N o a ~ w ~ ?~ ' i L C m ~ m m ~ o A a v o m v m ~ p a m ~ N m rn o t ~ - ~ ~ UJ ~ T a0 ~ N p ~ 9 w _ ~ = J+ ~ 4 N m ur ~ rn m ~ ` ~ - O ' U N C >. ~ u N a . w ~ ~~ ~ 6 m o .- - ~~ m +r Q ~ m ` ~ ~ o 3 o v Y t ~ ~ `m Q v~~ a U N ~ w o= o - ~ v o c am ~ o ~ ~ ~ -` U O G Y m F O tmj N m ~ N ~ O m L r - m t ~ O } N ~ '_ U r '~ ~, ~ ~' F ° ao o° ~° o m m rm- a v a' °> ~, w U n ti a ~ >, a` ~ 'o ~> o : v ¢ a ~o ° t 'o ^ ~ ~ a s ~' m v O N N Q ~ v ?~ Q~ 0] ~ $i N a m U S y O o rn G ~ m~ v ° 3 ~ N ? 3 C U O ~ 0 ~ L .~ O T t6 N Q ~ O a ~ O t N ~ N O O O a .~ "O m ~ m a ~ °~ m ~ 0 ~ C t ~ o ti 3 ~~' a m O = U Q v N m ~ ~ N uJ N O O ~ v ° m m .~ Y m o m m ~ a m ~ E _~ m c ~ ~~ m- ~ ~ ~ ~ U u a m - ^ _ m ~ ° m ai c ~ ~ o m a ? ° v O T 3 3 U ~ p~ O o .. v ~' N ai v ~ t a N a v C ~ a __ N N p fi a o_ ~ m ~ a S a ~ L m ~~ . ~ a ~ m m Q ~ _ _~ m v; S~ o a c o ~ m $ ~ o _ o ~ v m m v a 'a v O a a F F o c k .gym. 3 ai o P n. °- a ~ a rn ~= v ~ °' o ~ v m ~ a~ ~ - m T a .~ a o c '4 v ~ ~ F -o ~ °1 0 ai v= a` m ~ v m °~ a m` m _v E v c o a i ~ °' ~ ~ t o - 'q a ' a m o o~ ~ ~'-~ .c m y ,n N m `~ m ~ ~~ T m _ Q 3 .G T ~ 9 ~ v m p~ ~• 3 v, ~c m 3 N m ~~ m ° ~ m ~ ~ N m ~~ o P ~° °- Q. -'m a ro a o o v v, m e rn r m ;_ ~ m c ai v v c ~ s m_ n . o ~ c 4 = m ~' ~ 2 "r a> v N fl .~ m s °- v ? ~ h m a o >, = `m o. T m o Y c c ~ . w j ~ v w 6 ~ ° >^ ~ m R¢ Q ~' to a °1 c H m 7„ v ~ m` S m n a. a s to O ~, o m v `o a>i v o~ U o a w` y u v ~ a . . . • ~ W - ~ - - - - .~+ ~ ~ ti o a L y. m m m Q m N .~ LL i .~ O V z Q z r O Q w `w G a ~ c m m ~ m a y ~ m > Y a m M f0 ~ R a •= N G ? v Q a ~W d l6 C W 'G ~ F i LL ~ ¢ t u i a N .„ m v. m > ~ Ct v ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~~ o ~ ~ ,moo ~~n m ~ " Y ~ o ~ ~ aa - o o` 0 0 0 f N~ J N N N N N N L N 'C L N ~ m N ~ m C N 'C ~ v m ~ p c ~ p m ~ ~ ° v fl- d a' U ~ >, ~ j ~~ U 9 U ~ ~ ~ v a ~ U U ~G ~ E r L '~ Q ° ~ m ~ , ~' Y ~ ° z in - ~ c N- ,~'. c - c h m s o m .~ ~. A S N ~ o 9 0 °`a w °~ ~ m ., o W Q c°i ~ ~ `o w F v `°- W a ~ 3 0 ~ v ~ U U ~ a ~ ~ U U o p U m v ~~ v o 10 a ~ ~ m c .~ u. m 4 m~ <~ LL t ¢ ~ E m H E m_ ~ v ~ u H " .°~ E J ~. (,7 d S Z N f /J ~ S U d Z S J7 N d U U U 1 U m d d N U ai m O Q > N N .= t N a U N N U 9 lfi - j N N q Q] ~ O a ~ T 2 ~ o ~ N ~ v "T'. X L N ~ .. ~ ~ N ~ N > ~ N N m N ~ O N ~ a 0 U ° (' S ~ N >T U a N t ~ o v m m a~ o m £ ` v ~' v -X o v ~ m v p w C 3 N N o ~ c ~ ~ a c 2 m a ~ s v c ~ ~' c a o 3 v m o m ~ a ` v ~ (b ~ ~ N V ~ ~ O T _ ° ~ N ° iU d] ~ U - o C C N ~ N !6 r ~ a N ~ ~ ~ ° ~ = s ~ ° ~ , c a i - f0 3 O M C ° ~ m a ° ~ v ~ ~~ a U ° _ > > O N - -O J U ~ T ~j j N ~ t j ° a i4 ~ a N U ~~ ~° a N N a to N OI a 2 ~ ~ m ~" m a - ~ U N a - o s _. ~ n m m o N M1' v u r N m O o C _ 3 N lab ~ c N _ ^ v - - o ~ ~ 0 . u~ ~ `~ v a t s m o f t ~ c v` o ~~ 4 -° ~ cNi . m m c m _ ~~ v a`~ u 3 ° a v a m L ° ~ ~- o ~c c - d v ~ v ~ m a ~' _ v >' S N Q d? '~ ~ N N ~ a - ~ O g =v. -c m m ~ o '~ w a~ o ~ _ s a, o` a a a~ ~ a~ m U _ c ~~ L 3 v? 5 E d o _ _ m ~ ? o ~ a v _ m ~ w ~ F ~ ~ fi °~ ~ Y ~ N O a s (D y>.' ° .~ U m u ° ° N a v ~ N ~ O °1 O Q ~ Lam' 3 ~ N C ~ N N N ~ ~ F ip ~ ~ ~ °- {Z !6 ° ~ ~~ U N - W C £ ~ N ~ N (Ut3 y - dj ~ N ° fi _ -~ - v ~ 4 W 3 a fi ~ ° w ~ ~ a L o ~_ U ° ~ ` ny ` m fl ~" ° 3 v `~ - o' ° v c m m f° z ~ w ~ o ~ .o a ~ o m v P m m ~ v ~ v m U~ Y ~ ~ 'O t ~ o ~ ~ v ~ a ~a ^' v. s ~ ~ ~ 'o a ~ ~ T ~ ~O m ^- m a ~ ~ m ° a ~ ° O v u m ~ c ~ a v C m t ~ N ~ W ~ }y W -o W U d U t] ~ a~ o ~ m '~ W W 0 > ld -fl ti a ai ` y„ N v v v v v a z a w d Q U W L v 4 N N O t ti h O N N ,~O O I c fi U ,~O N 3 m ;n d N .~ t C w m t c ti 0 c N G fi N N L C V O 3 d S j O ~/! -^~. 4 j ~~ m b C ~ O m 3 N ~' °1 ~ ~ U ~ O N U -.,. 3 ~ O U ~ N ° b ~ ~ ~ Z `. a = b ~ N i ~ a L p~ 7 ti L ~ A ~ n U a G! a O ~ ~' T m m ~ m 3 0 = ~ ,q r~ y a F m y .6 a ~ ~ 3 s ~ o c °~ ~ M ~C C ° ~ "~ ~ m LL _ a ~ a - `c 2' m LL LL ~ LL ~ ~ ~ N _~, ~ >. ~ '. ~ N ~ ~`~ v a ,«o Fin ~ r _ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ oa c F fn ~ ~ In o N ° ~ v ~ m m ~ m m ~ ~ `c °i v = ~ > _ a m Y m m ~ v ~ ~ ~ m N U N U U U_ ~ m d ~ v .- v v v v ° m .- 6 ~ ~ ~ > > ~ 3 ~ v ~ o a ~ ~ m ~ O F ~ ~_ ~ ~ U 4. ° J U N U U U U~~ Z f °- ! j a c m ai 3 t ~ a ~ c m 2' v m ~ `0 3 U J ° T ~ ~ ~ ~ a ° m ° ~ m 3 a ~ m a `'~ 2"i ° 3 v ~ v ~ Q ~ ~ a m c ~ m m v ~ '~ = U J m ~ a t J N w ~U ~ ~ N S' 6 4 m ° ~ ~ ~ o o cs = v i ~ m t a ~ c ° m ~ U ° ~ ~ > > ~ ~ Q m ~ N ~ _ w ~ ° ' c ~ Q _ a v .° m N _ ~ v ~ a - ~ a ~ = Q U 'O O 3 a ° U R N ~ v ~ 'v ~ ¢ m y t 3 0 ,o c m N P m Q -9 _ - 'a ~ ~ m r ~ °~, n' m v Q ~ t l0 C 'a R a N T ° O J Ul O+ ° ~ U U o `o U ~ ~ d r - m ~ 1" L ~ ~ ~ n ~~ ° ~ ~; £ - c = c ~° u - a y v - ° s 3 m ° `° ~ .. .? =i ~ ` = 3 ~ a "' v ~? ~ a ~ a ° O U ~~-' m N ~ m i ~ i ~ ~ m o '° O ~! N U fi~ ?~ c - } C m ~ 3 N £ ~ ° ~ t L° dl ;Y O J ~ m ~ 3 '~ ~ U N ~ C O p~ '~ o C ~ E~ c fi a °- ~ -a - a N o m .~ ~ ~ ~2 m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn . -° m - ° m P> v 'a m °~ o Q o m ~ v ~ ~ .a ` a ~ ~ ~ o 0 N m p ~ N z v "• ~ ~ ` f m m` s m 'o _ s ~ a m '~ a U ~ ~ M T N J °. ° ~ N ~ ~ ~ U O N O IIi O G UUi O ~ Y N U L~ N W _ m ~ m °' a_~ a '° .c v ~ m c ~ .~ ~ i4 ~ t `~ o N U ~ - O ~ ~ O ~ ~ U ° .~ s m .~ Fv- m o m y, w '~ ~ v- o y m m m ~ m v ~ N N U N _ m ~ ~= a ~~ ~ o a°~ Q o a o - w o - w - a. ~ ._ ._ __ _> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ N d W z 0 U t `w H ~ O ~ ~ ~ >" ~ ~ ~ E a~i ° n a m m - E a m in ~ m m = n ~ ca ~ ~ o_ V a P v ~ E = o ~~ R M ~_ o Q m L ~ _ m ~ ~' J~ E ~ ~ O l6 U J a m 3 (6 n 3 ~ R LL v= ~, w N ~ U K -fl a c t m m c m m o j ~ a " ~. ~yJ m ~ p N ~ . C ~ ~ ~ W 0 f1 ~ Z ~ ~ ~ >~ !~ o] ~ N w U n li 4 ~ N.~ m v. m > ~ Ca m,n ,, L N Y~ O E ~ :Q w O F N ~ ~ m ~ -' ~Yaa - 0 0 .~ 0` 'o o O1 O f N~ J N N N N Sc N J L C ~ N N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ N Y l6 Y l6 ~ ~ _ Q _ t O ~ N ~ ~ O N N N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ O N N N ~ ~~ O N N E v ~ ~ - ~_ - ~_ v N ~ ' U ~ U_ N O ~ ~ N U E ? E U ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ N E O N O ~ ~ -_ N ~ ° > ~ ~ y a (n a> m > °~ o> ° m ° m > N ° U o m Q ° m > v U U7 0 ~ v !> o U ° o ~ w >` w o d~ j Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ v j ~ ~O 3 ~ ~ j Q ~ ~ ~ d a o u o u o ° o u m a v R o ° ° ~ m ~ L ° ~ ~ L a J ~. (,7 N U UJ Z 'S U N U U N U Z J S' UJ (~ U Z^S U U U (n E U 3 o ~' 0 v L L O r :o ~ a m °' ~ Q = ^ a t a ~ ~ .~ a m ~ ~ ~? m ai Q o a ~ ~- °~ ~ m ~ m iv a' ,~ a N N ~ O- O L N O N a ~ }~- ~ N U N s 3 m m ?~ U a m L a 0 ~. s 0 a = m so 5 m ti '° ro n ~ a m ro ~ ° L o w o t° - w c" o. o > ~ m m a m .,>. n m m w £~ ~ ~ 04 ~ ~ ^ U ~ - r m ~ ~ m o a ~~ Q m m a L v ° - ~ '° ~~ o~ a o v a t o ... 9 a 9 ~ ~ t .. Q ° i L U ~ 9 ~ C ~ ~ ~Gi a V' ~ ~ ~[ ~ a N O a N ~ L ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a O a o c ~ m " ~ O ~ G N ° ~" .~ o N c a a .~ o = ~ z m ~ _~ s o ~ ~ N~ ~ o_ fi ~ t_ m s o ~ L ~ ~ m U o O ~' • a ~ o .~ O ~ E° ~ N m a m p ° ho ~ E ~t 10 "r ~' O. .~ ~ 3 3 00 -C ~ r ~ o~ E a ~? c o' m .c fi o a t ° ~ - F- c w ° E o a w m ~ `a o - mo t ~~ m o + o ~ ~ ~ " m ~ ` ~ _~ m o m` _ a ~ - o v c ~ ~ a n a ~ m ° - 7~ _ ~ O -Q O ~ L N O R O -C S ~ n '~ a a N ~ . L > G ~ a °Ji ~ 4- E a ~- t - 3 ~ ~ w O m~ o ~ ~ O 4 ~ r ~ o v j ~ ~ ~N >. ~ v ~' ~ 'C a ° m ° m m ., o. a ~ ~ w w 3 a ~ a c a ° s~ °~ ° ~~ ° ... ._ ~ m E • °~ ~ S+ - v s ~ o> a ~^ 4 co f) m •a (° N ~ io vT• (° y„ fN z a w d Q U W W r L Y R w ._ w C d 3 N .„ m v. ~ T ~ am,n,, ~ T ~i o ~ ~ a a m ~ ~ ~ ~n _ - E E m ~~ 3 3 F ~ ~ J m L ~ N t4 Q m N ~ .C N - ^, c ~ t ~ E o ~ t a r .. ~ t ~ E .. 10 = U N ~ ~ O N N U N N fl v, ` o v, a ~ vi A Q o '' O a ... ~'" a~ ~ ~" a s - S ~ ~ °' ~`o ~ ~ ar D ~ 2,, ~ ~ ~ A a c ~ ~- u - ~ - :, Q m P u ~~ o E~ ~ m ~ u .~ E~ ~ m ~ ;° u° a a K z° v a a m v a a ai a m P a `m L° _o O C O L O a ~ ~ N p ~ O 2 C ~ ~ °y O .q U , - ~ L ~ _ U £O n t ~ v i N L ~ a _ U O `r U_ 9. m s ~ v t ~ m m °, C o 0 o L ~ v N m 0 c N a a ~ O ~ - ~ a m O ~~ 2 ~ N L° ~ ~. t6 T = ~ _ tL C ~ ~ m ~ T. '~' n' ~ w _ _ `- N CC~ G } U U O ~ E a ~ a a `m ' ~ ~ ° N _ w a ~ ° w o ° m ~ ~ a P m fl o n a ? m v ~ i ~ .a ` ~ w a o ~ c k ~ m }' ° - ~ ~ ai o m ~ t .° _ U ~ ?' Fi o c m °~ S ~ ~ '~ ~ a ~ ~ m a o r c ai ~ 9 U ~ ~O t m ~ ~ ~ ~_ } a O ~ ~ m > ~ u U _N d' Q m ~ ~ `m N - ~ o a a ~ s °~ ~ m ~ ~ U O ~ t 'O 10 ~ ~ > ii W C - Q m c ~ U }LLl v ~ ~ (0 r 9 l] y. fN N /~ O .~ O C yi R 'w C C d t 3 N T ~ d }+ . N rs _~ n, wo Ern a T. ~ E a` ~ ~ ~ o ,. o` r o F f/1 ~ ~ C~ !n N ~ .. N ~ - L dJ F m .. N ~ - a~`~ = ~ °_ R !~ ~ m m f ~ in U N U U ~ C , : (n ~ o In U7 ~ C o ~ w .- .2~' v c i ~ ~ p "~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ E E ro c J U ~ U U U = ~ :° Sc m 0 R >, a y g E m t ~ v ~ U N U U (6 U a U N .~. G t U d] a 3 ~ _ ~ T N G N m r m o a L a m ~ s ~ ~ a 3 O m m v ~ U ~ ~ U N - .°~ N r2 m ~ ~ U ~ T ~ t } a O m j o ? N °J a v } V. a ~ _ o ~ L° ~ L T ~ F ai '° s o °' ~~ ° w t a O ~ ~ 4 ui O - ~ O U ~ ~ _ v. m t ~ N_ ~ v ~ ¢i 3 3 o V m °~ m ._ a ? ~ E m m ~°, `m s > ~ a m m ~ m m v s U ~ a N N N ~ ~ 3 .~ T ^ N U T ~ ~ O a V i4 C O ~ N C (0 f0 ~ ~ 9 O 3 U N ~ U '2 ~ O a O ~ OI ~ _ .~ ~ _ ~ ~ d .- ~ ~ 3 ~ a o a ~ ~ " N E g o° o a m N a 3 n .9 f6 a R ~ •- O o a ~ ~ ~ O ~i P m a o .~ U O .~ - _ U $ m ~ m w u ~ ,~ T ° v r a ~" m :~ -o ~ ~ ~ v o 5 m c ~ 0 a m vim, ~ - N s .y P ~ m" a ro ». _ .o ~ `a c c m P w " fi U l6 ~ U~ L U ~ r N Q ~ ~ U O o m` ~ Q ~' _ _ o U ~ ~ w N ~ m °~ m 5 ~ ~ f4 c - rn o ... ~> •. O O p o v a ~ ~ c_ o m a m N ~ ~ ~ z U ~ O o - v U ?~ Q ~ U O ~ L N t ~ _ u ~ ~ O N O m m~ o~ .c o >, 3 ~° m ~ m -~ ~ ~ o ,~- ,~ _o m l o~~ ~ v' ~ ~ a o ~ m m r m ~ ~- o N O ~ "U v N ° ° ~ m S ..~. N fi N w m 16 a ~ c W 0~ a a x m ~ U U a - ~ x ?~ ~ o y w - _ _ > > v c~ - _ _ f6 co 4 m U co 'O m y. y z J z H Q U c `w H G im~lementa~~i~n ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ CHAPTER FOUR: Rv1PLEIv1ENTATION chapter 4: implementation TH E DEVELOPMENT OF TH E YOUTH MASTER PLAN involved a detailed analysis of future needs. This section outlines the immediate costs associated with moving forward to implement a youth facility for Temecula as well as additional costs to implement priority programs. It is anticipated that additional costs will be identified as other strategies are implemented. These would include both future capital costs and operational costs for the development of the youth facility and other needs not yet fully identified. Therefore, this section includes ,. FUi"7Qli?g iS i?28C1~eClr s~.l~;gestions regarding a number of funding sources that might be used to finance the new facilities, improvements, and maintenance needs identified in the future. for t?ew facility RECREATION FACILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY programs ai7c! ofher A Recreation Facility Feasibility Study is needed to determine the best model for lmprOV£'mei7fS. a youth facility in the City of Temecula, including a central facility, satellite facilities, or a commercial youth "lifestyle center." In addition, the design program and space requirements, location, partnerships, and estimated development and operating costs should be identified. The feasibility study, which is estimated to cost approximately $1 QQ,OdO, will continue to involve the community through working with a project steering committee and stakeholders and through using multiple ways to solicit anti gather community feedback. STAFFING NEEDS The Youth Master Plan recommends an expanded set of youth-focused programs and strategies that will require additional staff support. Based on the recommendations included in this Plan, two full-time and six part-time staff positions are needed to fully implement these improvements at an estimated cost of $213,695 per year. The Human Services Manager position will be charged with overall implementation ofthe Youth Master Plan. Seven positions are targeted to support youth and teen recreation opportunities and job skills/training development. DRAFT TEIvIECULA YOUTH IuIASTER PLAN i 19 CHAPTER FOUR' IMPLEMENTATION StrategylPurpose Position Annual Cast # of staff Total Annual a Cost Oversi ht of Youth Maser Ilan Duman services f1%lanaacr $95,000 1 $95,Cr00 Ex and outh and teen ro rams Part-time coordinator $14,690E 4 $58,760 Create intramural sports program Part-time coordinator $14,690 ~ 2 $29,380 Provide job skills training/opportunities Full-time coordinator ~3Q555 1 $30,555 Total cost $213,695 Additional Personnel Costs: "Includes benefits s $14.69(hr x 1,000 hrs {salary + benefits} Since programs currently operated in Temecula recover about 30°I° of their costs, it is estimated that programs implemented as a result of the youth master plan will likely not be more than 20% self-supporting and will require ongoing City support. POTENTIAL FUNDING METHODS As Plan implementation occurs, additional capital and operations costs will be identified to implement key strategies. This section identifies some possible funding sources for implementing these additional capital and operations costs. General Fund The General Fund is subsidized primarily through taxes and provides most of the City's operating revenue. For many cities, the General Fund is primary source for capital improvements. Since all City services must compete for these funds, this source can change from year to year. Development Impact Fees This is a fee paid by developers for the impact of their residential project on the existing park system. The money received can be used for the acquisition and development of parks, open space, trails and other recreational facilities. Two statues apply to park development fees in California: The Quimby Act: Quimby Act is applied to the development of single- familyand multi-family residential property. Requirements are outlined in Temecula Subdivision Ordinance Section 16.33. The revenue from these fees can be used to purchase land or improve existing parks. Quimby fees are calculated based on the cost of land acquisition and the maximum state standard of 5 acres11,000 residents. Specific standards vary according to the community's existing level of service. 20 I DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN CHAPTER FOUR' IMPLEMENTATION AB9600: AB1600 creates the framework for Park Impact Fees. These fees are charged to developers to offset the cost of maintaining a certain parkland level of service. Impact fees can be used for land acquisition or development, but not for maintenance or repair of existing facilities. Community Development Black Grant (CDBG) Funds Grants from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are available for a wide variety of projects. These funds are used for projects and programs in lower-income areas of the community. General Obligation Band These are voter-approved bonds with the assessment placed on real property for a specified period of time. Passage requires atwo-thirds voter majority. The revenue can only be used for capital improvements, and not for maintenance. Major disadvantages of this funding option are the high approval requirement and the high interest rate. Revenue Bands These bonds are sold and paid from the revenue produced from the operation of a facility. If the facility does not produce enough revenue to pay for debt service, the agency must then subsidize repayment from the General Fund. Revenue bonds do not require a public vote, but interest rates are generally higher than those of General Obligation bonds. These bonds are a good fit for improvements that will eventually involve user fees, such as community centers, swimming pools and some types of regional parks. Donations The donations of labor, land, or cash by service agencies, private groups or individuals are a popular way to raise small amounts of money for specific projects. Exchange or Sale of Property ff the City has an excess piece of property with some development value, it could be traded for a private piece of property more suitable for park use. Joint PubliclPrivate Partnership In this concept, a public agency will enter into a working agreement with a private corporation to help fund, build, and/or operate a public facility. Generally, the three primary incentives that a public agency can offer are land to place a facility (usually a park or other piece of public land), certain tax advantages, and access DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN 21 CHAPTER FOUR' IMPLEMENTATION to the facility. While the public agency may have to give up certain responsibilities or control, it is one way of obtaining public facilities at a lower cost. Exactions These are costs of necessary public improvements that are passed on to the adjacent landowners. Public Land Trusts Public land trusts such as the Trust for Public Land, Inc. and the Nature Conservancy can acquire and hold land for eventual acquisition by a public agency. Government Grant Programs There are a number of government grant programs for park and recreation projects. Key programs are: Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETFA-LU}: Originally called The Intermodal Surtace Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), this federal program has funded a wide variety oftransportation-related projects. Funding is passed through the states. In 2005 the latest version of this legislation was authorized as SAFETEA-LU for the 5-year period of 2005-2009. Over the years, California has received considerable revenue fortrail- related projects from these funds. In terms of recreation, the program primarily funds landscape and amenity improvements related to trail and transportation projects. The money can be used for both maintenance and capital construction, and is primarily focused on regional systems and not local neighborhood trails. Land and Water Conservation Funds: This grant program is funded by the National Park Service and administered by California State Parks. In the past this was one of the major sources of grant money for local agencies. In the 1990s, funding at the federal level was severely cut, but in recent times more money has become available. The funds can be used for acquisition and development of outdoor facilities and requires a 50% match. State Bicycle Funds: This is revenue from state gas taxes that is distributed to California cities for the development of bicycle lanes. This 22 DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN CHAPTER FOUR: IMPLEMENTATION can be a good funding source for developing bicycle lanes and off street bicycle trails. Recreafrorr Trails Program: This is a grant program iunded through the California Parks and Recreation Department. Projects eligible under this program include 1 }maintenance and restoration of existing trails, 2) development and rehabilitation of trailhead facilities, 3) construction of new recreation trails, and 4) acquisition of easements and fee simple title to property. Grants are distributed on an annual basis and require a 20% match . Sfafewicle Park Bonci (Proposifron 40): In recent years, California has passed two statewide bond measures for funding parks and open space projects. The funding program has several elements including a grant based on a per capita allocation, a matching grant and several competitive grant programs. Other State Funds ©ther grant sources from the State of California include the Youth Soccer Recreation Program Grant. Prefect grants range from $75,000- $1;000,000. Private Grants and Foundations ivlany trusts and private foundations provide funding for capital projects and programs. Grants from tl-lese sources are typically allocated through a competitive application process, and vary dramatically in size based an the financial resources and funding criteria of the organization. They are sometimes difficult to find and equally difficult to secure because of the open competition. They usually fund unique projects or ones of extreme need. DRAFT TEMEOULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN I 23 bibliography ~~~' ~ ~ .- ~ _ 1 - jac~ BIBLIOGRAPHY bibliography Benson, PL, Scales, PC, Hamilton, SF, Sesma Jr., A, Hong, KL, Roehlkepartain, EC; Positive Youth Development So Far, Core Hypotheses and Their 1mplicationsforPoticyand Practice; Search Institute, Insights &Evidence, November 2006, v3, n1. Search Institute, Boosting Student Achievement, New Research on the Power of Developmental Assets, Insights &Evidence, October 2003, v1, n1. Search Institute, Tapping the Power of Community, Building Assets to Strengthen Substance Abuse Prevenfion, Insights &Evidence, March 2004, v2, n1. Temecula Valley Unified School District, California Healthy Kids Survey Data, Multiple Year Comparison Data for ~", 9f", and 12f!' Grade Students; 2003 and 2005. Temecula Valley Unified School District, Performance lndicatorData, 5t" Grade; 2003 and 2005. DRAFT TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN 25 environmental scan summ I n t r o d u c t i o n Environmental Scan Summary INTRODUCTION The City of Temecula is facilitating acommunity-based planning process to develop the Youth Master Plan (YMP), a comprehensive and holistic plan to address the broadest possible range of needs and interests of Temecula's youth. This Environmental Scan Summary presents the outcomes of the first phase of the planning process, the objectives of which were to identify assets, challenges and opportunities related to youth development in the City of Temecula. To generate this information, the City and its strategic planning consulting team1l~Ioore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc. (1\~IIG)~onducted a variety of community outreach activities involving youth, parents, educators, community organizations, policymakers, businesses, and many other stakeholders. This summary outlines the major themes that emerged from the environmental scan activities and sets the foundation for the development of a strategic framevTork for the YNIP. Project Overview Located at the southern-most end of Riverside County, the City of Temecula offers a relatively affordable, safe, and family-friendly environment to live, work, and play, which has been a major draw for new residents from all areas of Southern California and beyond. Since its incorporation in 1989, the cites population has grown by over 350% and no~v stands at 9?,935 residents. In an effort to preserve and enhance the family-friendly nature of the community, the City Council, in partnership with the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (I'VUSD), charged the Community Services District with developing acommunity-based plan focused on Temecula's youth. The Youth Master Plan will serve as the communit~~s strategic plan to address a broad range of social, educational, health, recreational, creative, and developmental needs of Temecula's youth and teens. Such a broad scope necessarily requires community- wide involvement and partnerships vrith public, private and nonprofit organizations who serve Temecula's youth and families. Most importantly, the planning process requires involving youth of all backgrounds and interests to best understand their needs and to generate creative ideas for youth-oriented programs, services and facilities. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n Strategic Planning Process The ten-month strategic planning process has three phases (see Appendix A for a b aphic representation of the strategic planning process}: ^ Phase Une: Environmental Scan (February through June 2007} ~ Develop a baseline of information and input to assess the current state of Temecula's youth and the "environment" in which they live, learn, work and play. ^ Phase Ttivo: Plan Development (August through September 2007) ~ Utilize the findings from the environmental scan phase to build the strategic framework for the plan including the community's vision, values, goals, and strategic directions. ^ Phase Three: Plan Approval (October through November 2007) ~ Prepare the Draft and Final versions of the Y11~7P, which include detailed strategies, actions, timelines, responsibilities, and resource needs. Environmental Scan Activities During the environmental scan phase, the project team solicited input through a broad range of activities. The Planning Team consisted of Community Seri%ices District staff, other City staff and MIG project tease members. The planning team met regularly to coordinate the planning process and environmental scan activities. The environmental scan phase included the following activities: ^ A Youth Advisory Committee representing youth from a varietsr of backgrounds and experiences formed and met to identify the outcomes they desired from the YMP, as well as review and respond to emerging themes from the environmental scan phase. ^ A Steering Coininittee comprised of Temecula's civic leaders, representatives from youth-seL-~~ing organizations, educators, public safety officers, and other stakeholders formed and met to identify the outcomes they desired from the Y~~IP, as well as review and respond to emerging themes from the environmental scan phase. The Youth Advisory Committee and Steering Committee first convened in a joint meeting, and both committees twill work together and separately to continue to b aide the planning process. ^ Five (5) focus groups of diverse Temecula youth met with members of the project team to share their perspectives about assets, challenges and opportunities for positive youth development in Temecula. Participants included youth from Temecula Valley High School, Rancho Vista School, SAFE, and the Teen Council. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary I n t r o d u c t i o n A total of nine (9) focus groups ofyouth-serving organizations met vrith a project team member to share their organizations' perspectives and experiences about assets, challenges and opportunities far positive youth development in Temecula. Participants included members of social service organizations, after school care providers, the faith community, educators from the public and private sector, law enforcement, the business community, parenting organizations, and the arts community. The MIG project team conducted a total of eleven (11) stakeholder interviews with key civic leaders to learn their perspectives about assets, challenges and opport<nities for positive youth development in Temecula. Participants included members of the City Council, Board of Directors of TVUSD, executive management Pram these agencies, and select business leaders in the community. A Community Vv'orkshop involved over 200 youth and adults from throughout the community to learn about the puLpose of the YMP and provide their visions and perspectives of assets and challenges for the future of Temecula's youth. The workshop provided opportunities for youth and adults to provide their feedback within peer groups as well as combined groups, to better understand the similarities and differences between generational perspectives, all building towards development of a shared, community-wide vision. A total of 753 youth and 33$ adults completed a community questionnaire that probed the community's opinion about assets, challenges and opportitznities for positive youth development in Temecula. The two versions of the questionnaire-one for youth, and one for adults-were made available via the Internet or through a paper version distributed throughout the community. The raw data was compiled and organized to assess trends. To support the key findings from the Environmental Scan activities, data from the community questionnaire and a study from Temecula galley Unified School District, called "California Health Kids," has been included in this summary throughout. This data is graphically represented in bar charts and quotes in the following sections. This summary is organized into three main sections: Section I: The first section of this summary identifies the community assets and challenges faced by Temecula's youth that were identified through the Environmental Scan activities. This section also describes the differences in responses by youth and adL~lts. Section II: Opportunities that should be considered as we plan for Temecula's youth are described in this section. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary I n t r o d u c t i o n Section III: The third section of this summary focuses on the areas of strategic action that will be further developed in the Youth Master Plan. 4 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y I. ASSESSING TEMECULA'S YOUTH AND THE COMMUNITY The input of the Youth Advisory Committee, Steering Committee, focus groups, stakeholders, Communit~T «~orkshop, and questionnaires were integral to the collection of information about the "environment" of todaS~s youth in Temecula. Participants in these activities discussed the positive qualities of Temecula's youth environment, as well as opportunities for change. Community Assets During the Environmental Scan activities, community members expressed the elements and qualities that make Temecula a great place to live for people of all ages. Participants appreciate Temecula's community, places, programs and services, and government and community leadership, all of which make the city afamily-oriented, safe, clean place with asmall-town feel that residents love. Responses included everything from the benefits of aforward-thinking, action-oriented Cite Council to the beauty of local natural resources to the v alue of knovring your neighbors. Participants were particularly proud that the community cares about its youth and is dedicated to providing for the success of youth today and into the future. Challenges for Temecula's Youth Despite all the assets held by Temecula and its community, there are also many areas for improvement, particularly in providing for the health, safetST, and well-being of the communit~s youth and teen population both today and into the future. The following list of major concerns and issues for Temecula's youth were arrived at through analysis of community input, assessing which issues were discussed most often and which were most often identified as major priorities. The following four issues were identified by youth and adult participants as the most significant and of greatest priority: Unless otherurise referenced, the graphs and tables represent information gathered through the opinion questionnaire, meant merely to gauge opinion and not to collect statistical information. Drugs and Alcohol - In every method of input and from both youth and adult populations, drug and alcohol use were identified as top challenge for Temecula's youth. Drugs and alcohol were most often mentioned by youth and adults when asking about the challenges facing Temecula's youth today, but were also frequently discussed when answering other questions. For instance, a small number of youth cited drug use as a reason they no longer play organized sports. A number of youth requested places NUSD survey: "During your life did you ever ..." y o 2003 ~ 2005 a ~o°i° ~ 60% 50°~° ao°r 30°r° ~ zo°r° 1 o°r° o°r° °' Drink Smoke Drink Smoke Drink Smoke a alcohol marijuana alcohol marijuana alcohol marijuana 7th grade 9th grade 11th grade City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y TVUSD survey: "During the past 3Q days, did you ..." ^ 2003 ~ 2005 ~ 50% ao% y 30% y 20% R 10% 0% ~ ~ Drink Smoke Drink Smoke Drink Smoke °~ alcohol marijuana alcohol marijuana alcohol marijuana 7th grade 9th grade 11th grade How many fun and cool things are there to do and go to foryouth and teens of Temecula? Youth Adults 4.9% 12.0% A lot 12.0% 14.5% Just enough 22.2% 25.3% Don'f know/neutral 49.6% 47.6% Very little 11.2% 0.6% Nothing at all 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% to drink and do drugs when discussing facilities needed in Temecula. Both youth and adult participants identified a need for youth-specific rehabilitation centers, intervention programs, and preventative programs for substance abuse. !n 2005, 39 percent of 11th graders in Temecula Yalley Unified School District said they had been "very drunk or sick after drinking,' and 27 percen t said had been "high from using drugs. Hearty a quarter (23 percent} of lath graders said that in the past 30 days they had drunk °5 drinks in a couple of hours. ° tsorecloin, lacK of thiligs to cto -Youth anti adult participants also rated very highly a problem with a lack of things to do and places to go for youth and teens. Some participants identified particular types of things and places needed by the city {e.g. "places to go for young people aged 18-20," "places for teens to play music"), v~hile many identified a general lack of activities and locations. More specifically, many participants (particularly adult participants) requested organized activities that would not only keep teens entertained, but also have some educational or personal development aspect, such as job training, community service, or casual courses in subjects such as auto repair or cooking. Adidt participants also identified a need for "hand outs" that are f- d - d sa e an super~lse . Youth participants often requested places they could socialize and listen to music or play games without feeling like they were being watched too closely by adult or public safety supervision. When asked what types of recreation and activity facilities they want • 32.896 of youth responses were for sports facilities; • 31.996 of their responses were for entertainment facilities; • 11.896 of their responses were for Ataees to $party° and socialize. Peer pressure -Peer pressure, pressure to fit in, or treatment from other youth that lowers self-esteem were all identified as a major problem for Temecula's youth and teens. ~X~'hether encouraging young people to engage in destnictive behavior (such as drugs, alcohol, violence, gang membership, or doing poorly in school) or simply activities they would not normally participate in, or making young people feel less worthy, "uncool," or unwanted, pressure amongst peers is a major challenge in young people's everyday lives and long-term personal development. When asked b City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y what their "biggest personal issue" is, youth rated social dynamics and problems with friends as third highest. Transportation - Temecula s youth and teen populations also face a shortage of transportation options in getting to activities and places around the city. A majority of youth and adults identified rides from parents/guardians as the primary mode of transportation for youth, with other car-related options coming in second and third. Virtually no one identified the bus as a primary mode of transportation for youth, and only a small amount said youth use bikes, skateboards, or scooters or walk to where they need to go. Many participants How do youth and teens usually get around in Temecula? Take the bus Skateboard, rollerblade, scooter Bike Walk Ride with olherteens Dris.2 myself 62.3% Parentlguardian driers me 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% predicted that, without better ways for youth and teens to get there, planned activities or youth-oriented facilities might not make an impact. Other issues -The community also identified a number of other issues challenging Temecula's young people. • Bullying or violence from other youth and teens -While almost 70 percent of youth and adult participants agreed that they feel Temecula is a safe place for youth and teens, many identified racial and other discrimination and general youth violence as major challenges for the city's young people. TVUSD survey: "During the past 12 months at school, h ave you been harassed because of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation or disability?" ^ 2003 ~ 2005 50° U ~ . , ~ N 4f T ' ~ u a 0~ 7th grade 9th grade 11th grade • Job opportunities/training and Planning for life after high school - Vlany ~routh identified a lack of services and support for post-high school options, whether heading on to higher education or entering the job market. "Planning for life after high school" was in the top ten responses for "~~'hat are the top LZTTO issues facing jTouth and teens in Temecula" with both jTouth and adults. Participants requested more job training and internship options for Temecula's young people, including technical training, professional aptitude, and job seeking skills such as resume vTriting and interview skills. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary ° 0 30°k 30% 29°l0 27% 27% 30% 20% 1 o°r° ° 7 Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y • Public safety enforcement and curfew -Youth participants frequently expressed their frustrations Frith the actions of local police officers and with local curfew laws. Many youth expressed a desire for less cop presence and interaction when socializing in public spaces such as parks and many described how they could not even go to evening events, such as movies, without breaking curfew when going home. Fewer cops or less interterence from cops was the third most requested youth answer to "Whatare the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place foryouth and teens? 'after opening a teen night club and providing more hangouts. • Affordability and Problems with money -Perhaps in connection with limited local jab opportunities for young people, Temectila's young people have trouble affording activities in the area. Youth often requested lower cost/free organized activities and outings, and rated "lack of money" as one of the top ten issues facing yoL~th and teens in Temecula. Adults also recognized this as a problem. NUSD survey: Percent of students with "caring relationships with teacher ar other adult" ^ 2003 ~ 2005 60% 0 37% 0 36% 39°l0 40°l0 20°l0 0°l0 7th grade 9th grade 11th grade • 1Jltncuit relationsnips nenueen youtn and adults -Many youth participants described their difficulties in foi~rning respectful, understanding, caring relationships with adults in their communities. Whether with police officers, teachers, or even their own parents, Temecula's youth sense a lack of respect both from youth and teens for adults and from adults for youth and teens, and seek better relationships. Youth participants also thought higher expectations, more responsibility, and more opportunities to meaningfully contribute to their community would help form better relationships between themselves and adults. "Problems with parents° was in the top ten youth responses about "issues facing youth and teens in Temecula.' A family- or parent related problem was the fourth highest youth response to `What is your biggest personal issue?° 8 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y Differences in Youth and Adult Perspective Both youth and adult input are important to improving life for Temecula's youth and teens, but it is also important to understand the differences between their opinions, since each group may have different priorities and different ideas of what it means for Temecula's young people to live well. Top ten issues for Teinecula's youth and teens -For the most part, youth and adult participants focused on the same challenges Youth and Adult Responses to: "What are the top two issues facing youth and teens in Temecula?" iTop ten responses.) Youth Adult 1. Drugs 1. Nothing to do in their free time 2. Nothing to do in their free time 2. Drugs 3. Alcohol 3. Alcohol 4. Peer pressure, or pressure to fit in 4. Peer pressure, or pressure to fit in 5. Getting good grades 5. Bullying or violence from other youth and teens 6. No transportation; can't get around easily 6. No transportation; can't get around easily 7. Bullying orviolence from other youth and teens ~. Getting good grades 8. Problems with parents 8. Gangs 9. Planning for life after high school 9. Planning for life after high school 10. Lack of money 10. Problems at school that face the cit~s young people, including drugs, alcohol, peer pressure, boredom, and lack of transportation; however, they often ranked them differently. Youth rated dnigs and getting good grades more highly than the adults did, while adults ranked boredom and bullying/violence more highly. Youth included problems vrith parents and lack of money while adults did not; adults included gangs and problems at school ~=hile youth did not. Long-term personal development versus short-term entertainment - Through input from many of the environmental scan activities, it is also clear that adults feel it more important to focus on long-term, personal development-related needs, programs, facilities, and services, tivhile youth tend to focus on short-term, entertainment-related issues. For example, when asked what type of prob ams and services are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula, the top five responses from adults inchided job-related activities and help with personal problems, while youth focused more on excursions/trips, extreme sports, dance, and music. Input from focus groups, community workshops, planning team meetings, and other activities also confirm this pattern. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y General things the City can do to improve life for youth and teens - In the questionnaire, youth and adults both ans~~ered the question "What are the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for youth and teens?," where participants could write down any ans~~er they wished. Of the top 20 responses of youth and the top 20 responses of adults, 13 of the requests are the same or similar. Youth and Adult Responses to: "What are the tap three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for vouth and teens?" Adult Yauth 1. Swimming pool 1. Night clubsldance clubs 2. Safe hang-outs 2. More hang-outs 3. Provide more activities/things to do 3. Fewer copsAess hassling from cops 4. Teen center 4. More things to do 5. More cops 5. Sports facilities/programs 6. Music venues 6. Concerts/concert venues 7. Bowling alley 7. Shopping 8. Public transit improvements 8. Ice skating rinks 9. Arts center 9. Amusement park 10. lower cost/Affordability improvements 10. Water park 11. lce skating rink 11. Lower costlfree things to do 12. Job opportunities 12. Bowling alleys 13. Water park 13. Skate parks 14. Cultural activities 14. Swimming pools 15. Nighttime activities 15. Improve safety 16. Counseling services 16. Organized activities 17. After-school activities 17. Teen center 18. Job training 18. Public transit improvements 19. Volunteer opportunities 19. Special events 20. Safety 20. Better outreachladvertising of events 10 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y III.OPP4RTUNITIES F4R TEMECULA'S YOUTH Through the Environmental Scan activities, youth and adult participants not only discussed Temecula's challenges and assets for youth and teens, but also ideas for emphasizing the assets and confronting the challenges. Participants identified ideas for programs and services, facilities, and policies that might make Temecula a better place for youth and teens to live, play, develop, and prosper. Programs and Services Both youth and adult participants had suggestions for organized activities, support services, educational programs, and other such things the citSJ could do to keep youth entertained and to enhance personal development. Youth participants were particularl5r interested in entertainment-related programming, including field trips and excursions to local attractions and amusement parks and programming for recreational and extreme sports (eg. skateboarding, snowboarding). Job-related services and training were another top interest of youth, along vTith arts and cultural programs such as dance, photography, music and film production, and fashion. Adult participants were more interested in programs and seL~Tices for personal development, ranking job-related activities as the top priority and including specialized youth counseling services in their top five requests. In general, youth and adults emphasized flexibility in programming, understanding that youth's needs and interests change frequently and commenting that programming needs to stay current to maintain interest and participation. Facilities Participants also envisioned a variety of both specific facilities and multi-use facilities in ~vhich manSJ different programs, services, and activities could take place. Youth participants focused more on specific-use facilities - a dance/night club, bowling alleys, a water park, and an ice skating rink were high on the list -but also frequently discussed the need for a teen center, an arts center, areas for special events and festivals, and sports facilities. Adult participants proposed amulti-use teen center or recreation center, looking fora. place where teens What is the best location to provide youth and teen programs? Youth Adults 12.1 % 32.0°,6 Community center 18.8% 28.3°l° Teen center 10.1 % 12.5% Faith-based 21.1% 12.5°k School 14.4°~ 7.0 % Retail shopping area 0.7 % Homes 1 7 ~° Outdoorlneighborhood park 30% 20% 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% can not only participate in organized activities and programs but also access a variety of services such as job training and personal counseling. Some participants said that such a "one-stop shopping' approach to providing services and programs may increase access and visibility of offered services. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary 11 Opportunities for Ten~eculas Youth ~~~hen asked uThat the best location ~~ould be for providing youth/teen programming, 60.3 percent of adults and nearly one-third (30.9 percent) of youth ans~Tered "community center" or "teen center." Other ans~Ters included school, shopping mall%retail stores, faith-based facilities, and neighborhood parks. Policies Aside from instituting new programs and ser~Tices or building new facilities, adult and youth participants also recognized a need for higher-level, long-term, institutional changes in the city. In answering the question "what are the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for youth and teens," both adults and youth included a number of policy recommendations, including safety, cleanliness, access to transit, outreach, and police enforcement. 11~7any participants also recommended other ways the city could help in making activities more affordable, in providing weekend/`evening activities, and in creating job, volunteer, and civic service opportunities. Youth and Adult Responses to: "What are the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for youth and teens?" Adult Youth 1. Swimming pool 1. Night clubs/dance clubs 2. Safe hang-outs 2. More hang-outs 3. Provide more activitieslthings to do 3. Fewer cops less hassling from cops 4. Teen center 4. More things to do 5. More cops 5. Sports facilities/programs 6. Music venues 6. Concerts/concert venues 7. Bowling alley 7. Shopping 8. Public transit improvements 8. Ice skating rinks 9. Arts center 9. Amusement ark 10. Lower cost/affordability improvements 10. Water park 11. Ice skating rink 11. Lower cost/free things to do 12. Job opportunities 12. Bowling alleys 13. Water park 13. Skate parks 14. Cultural activities 14. Swimming pools 15. Nighttime activities 15. Improve safety 16. Counseling services 16. Organized activities 17. After-school activities 17. Teen center 18. Job training 18. Public transit improvements 19. Volunteer opportunities 19. Special events 20. Safety 20. Better outreach/advertising of events Special Youth Populations -Adult participants also recommended creating programs to focus on Temecula's special youth populations, including: • "At risk" youth -Participants suggested special programs for youth judged "at risk" for substance abuse, gang activity, violence, mental health problems, 12 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y or other destnictive activities. ll~7any recommended that programs should start as early as late elementary school and continue through high school. Additional attention for these youth could inchide personal counseling, job training, goal-setting programs, or education regarding the future effects of current choices. • First-time offenders -Participants suggested expanding the cit~s successful Youth Accountability Team program to intervene not only with at risk youth and first-time offenders committing very small crimes, but also with first- time youth offenders committing larger crimes. • Gifted and talented -Youth and adult participants called for extra support for those youth above the average intellectual and academic achievement level, including advanced counseling and support far higher education and far other academic opportunities. • Nan-English-speaking youth -Providing translation and support for non- English-speaking youth was important to participants who want to get this population engaged in the community and the resources and activities available. • Latch-key kids -Adult and youth participants were both particularly worried about the children of parents who commute to distant jobs and return home late in the evening, generally leaving youth home alone without supervision or direction. h2any suggested building a broader job base in the local area, not only to provide parents with closer jobs but to also possibly provide more job and internship opportunities for young people. Others suggested a wider and more accessible array ofafter-school activities and programs. • "Nan-rnainstreain" youth -Participants perceived a large problem vrith bullying, violence, and alienation of youth with social and cult~.iral interests outside the mainstream. llilany suggested providing intervention and education programs for all community youth to help prevent this discrimination. "Nan-college-track" teens - Youth and adult participants recommended providing more support to high school students and recent graduates who decide not to go on to traditional higher education experiences. Support for all varieties of the youth-to-adult transition is important to the community, particularly if youth seek to stay in the area. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary 13 Opportunities for Ten~eculas Youth Youth Civic Engagement NUSD survey: Percent of students with "opportunities for meaningful participation at their school" p 2003 ~ 2005 0 20% o l8% 0 16% 16% 20% 10% 0% 7th grade 9th grade 11th grade Throughout the Environmental Scan, youth were passionate about having opportunities to positively impact their community. Giving teens more responsibility, having more opportunities to impact their schools, having a say in city decisions, and just overall "being listened to" were particularly important to youth participants. One popular idea throughout the Environmental Scan actiznties was the creation of a "Youth Commission" or some other permanent, youd~- driven group of local youth and teens that focuses on how city policies, policy implementation, and improvements affect life for the city's young people. Another idea mentioned throughout the process was the creation of a city internship program, in which youth and teens could have direct input on things the city does while at the same time getting professional job experience and perhaps community service hours or a stipend. 14 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary Assessing Temecula ' s Youth and the C o m m u n i t y IV. IDENTIFYING AREAS FOR ACTIN After reviewing the information gathered through the Environmental Scan process, a number of themes emerged that describe topics and issues for creating goals, strategies, actions, and outcomes. These emerging themes describe opportunities for the City of Temecula to make the greatest positive impact on the city's youth population, as defined by the input of youth, parents, and other community members. These themes will be further developed in the "Plan Development' phase of the process, where they will be presented to the Youth Advisory Committee and the Steering Committee, who will then refine the themes as necessary. Youth-oriented "hang outs": Places where Temecula youth can hang out that are meant particularly for this population and that allow them to have a role in its design and development. These places should be safe and affordable and provide some leadership and% or managerial positions for youth. Places for artistiejereative expression: Youth-oriented venues for local or touring music, theatre, and other artistic performances or exhibitions, allowing local youth to display their works of art or play music into the evenings. Respect and understanding in youth-adult relationships: Bridging cultural and generational gaps to foster closer and more respectful relationships between youth and adults. Transportation access: Affordable, safe, and reliable transportation between residential areas and popular youth destinations such as the community center, movie theatre, restaurants, and other hang outs. PuUlic transportation routes with routes, station design, and schedules particularly suited to the youth population and keeping them safe. Mutually beneficial relationships between police and youth: A mutually beneficial relationship between youth and police «rhere police actively and with understanding keep youth safe and v~here youth maintain understanding of laws and authority. Jobs and job training: Job training -including interview skills, resume writing, and technical skills - and a variety of job and internship opportunities for youth of all education levels, career tracks, and abilities. Communication between youth and city: Atwo-way dialogue between city officials and the youth population so that youth know of events and opportunities for involvement and so that officials are aware of the concerns of the youth population. City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary 15 Opportunities for Ten~eculas Youth Public-private partnerships: Collaborative efforts from local businesses, officials, school districts, churches, parent groups, and other related individuals and organizations to provide organized activities and facilities for youth. Safety: An environment in which youth feel comfortable engaging in and traveling to fun, healthy activities. Youth are protected from gang behavior, violence, and drug and alcohol abuse, and feel safe traveling around the city. Organized Activities: Organized activities, athletic opportunities, services, and classes geared toward youth of all ages and abilities. The selection constantly changes based on the interests and needs of the youth population. Cornrnunity Facilities: Community centers and other spaces providing spaces and equipment for youth activities. Amenities are modern and constantly updated based on the interests and needs of the youth population. 16 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan -Environmental Scan Summary community meetings any .~.~ ~ interviews ~ ~ ,, CITY OF TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN FGCUS GROUPS (ADULTS) May 4, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Between April 17 and April 24, 2007, Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG} conducted 10 focus groups with adults as part of early outreach efforts for the Youth Master Plan (YMP}. Interviewees included representatives of civic, youth-serving, faith-based, and education organizations identified by staff members from the Community Services Department of the City of Temecula. These interviewees represented a range of community interests and experience, including members of: • YMCA • Boys and Girls Club • Temecula Valley Unified School District • Private schools • PTA organizations • Public safety • Arts and culture organizations • Cammunity-based arganizations that serve Temecula's youth and teens The following is a synopsis of findings organized by the thematic areas that emerged during interviews, including: • Cammunity Strengths and Assets • Issues and Challenges facing: o General o Organizations o Specific Youth o Parents • Cammunity Facilities • Programs and Services • Opportunities • Youth Involvement Community Strengths and Assets • Community characteristics: o Family-friendly Prepared by Ml G, lnc. o Affordable o Proactive and involved o Shared vision • Recreation and sports programs • Education community and system • Significant faith and values-based community o Interfaith council • Community facilities: o Museum o Library o Teen room at the CRC o Theatre o parks • Support programs: o Boys & Girls Club o YMCA o Youth Accountability Team o PTA Site Councils • City Council leadership: forward-thinking, proactive and prevention-focused o Connecting with youth • Proactive law enforcement and public safety providers • Safe and secure; low crime • Community resources • Agencylproviderportnerships • Environment and natural resources Issues and Challenges General • Family issues at the heart of youth problems o Insufficient parent/child interaction and skills support o Troubled youth are particularly challenging to manage o "Latch key" kids have limited supervision o Declining faith, values, morals and belief systems ^ Work ethic, respect for authority o Providing support to single-parent families ^ Bringing the community together as a support mechanism • Overcoming youth boredom and the "there's nothing to do" environment o Providing activities o Providing places to "hang-out" • Increasing occurrences of destructive behavior such as drugs and abuse o Increasing involvement in the courts system, frequency of truancy from school, and anger management issues o Overcoming cultural acceptance of alcohol use among youth o Building awareness of increasing abuse of over-the-counter drugs • Lack of positive role models and leadership to model good behaviors o Lacking a sense of what masculinity and femininity should be Prepared by Ml G, lnc. • Few transportation mobility options, especially for younger youth. • Saving the most troubled youth • Intergenerational sharing of talents • Excessive open boundaries of appropriate behaviors o Balancing supervision and freedom • Serving a wide range of needs and personalities • Supporting youth-ta-adult transitions o Offering other non-college options • Increasing sexual promiscuity • Lack of shared, human respect • Low self-esteem and self-knowledge o Diminishing religious faith and values o Lacking socialization and peer communication skills o Fitting into "mainstream" expectations • Providing community-based support for home-focused youth interventions • Low reading levels and listening skills • Youth who have resources tend to have a large amount of time and no supervision • Youth with few or na resources tend to have no supervisi9on at all • Peer pressures • Providing expanded resources for gifted youth such as cultural resources and higher education opportunities • Increasing numbers of non-English-speaking youth and community members • Lacking coordinated arts and cultural planning, programming and framework for youth o Addressing community concerns regarding expressive/controversial art • Lacking economic bases for encouraging youth to remain in the community as adults • Expanding broader community awareness and knowledge of resources • Lack of cultural diversity and perspectives; living in a bubble • Bullying of "non-mainstream" kids for not conforming to youth pressures Organizations Interviewees explained the challenges that their respective organizations face in serving Temecula's youth: • Maintaining family traditions of home-based care in a society that forces two incomes • Securing resources to meet the level of demand far services • Staying ahead of problem youth • Securing adequate space to deliver services • Measuring levels of success and needs for time and resources • Balancing the need to provide quality service with demands for high volumes of service provision {showing results} • Communicating the level of need for youth services • Meeting schools' demands for support Prepared by Ml G, lnc. • Increasing parents' communication levels with schools • Creating true partnerships between agencies • Lack of arts and culture focus within the education community • Societal limitations to expanded arts and cultural programming • Overlapping services between organizations Specific Youth Interviewees suggested that specific segments of youth and teens may need additional focus as part of the process: • Youth who are not participatory • Youth not yet in trouble or not yet identified as potentially troubled, but who are law achievers • Middle school students: assist with making positive choices • "Latch-key" youth with weak family structures: o Parents work and commute long hours o Single parents • Youth not on the "college-bound" track; providing them with resources and alternatives 0 Supporting 17-23 year olds in the youth-ta-adult transition o Considering local higher education opportunities • Youth with low self-esteem who act out with destructive behaviors • Youth with limited communication skills Parents • Increasing commute distances and travel time • Both parents working full-time o Little time to spend with youth o Little ability to track youth's whereabouts and activities • Lacking financial education to manage resources • Building awareness of youth challenges and dangers Community Facilities • Provide places that are appealing to youth o Addresses their needs and desires o Night entertainment o Out-of-the-box o Safe and secure o City leadership with support from other organizations o Avoid building a "teen center" • Target ages 18+ for youth-to-adult transition support • Pursue private sector economic development opportunities • Partner with a range of organizations to pool resources • Address backlog of demand far community facilities such as the CRC • Coordinate program and facilities development activities • Water park Prepared by Ml G, lnc. Programs and Services • Track and intervene with youth heading towards gang activity with mentoring and social services o Minimize adult-led interventions • Develop programs that encourage discipline, such as boxing and martial arts • Focus on 9-12 years olds • Utilize faith-based organizations to provide services within the community's youth support framework o Address separation of church and state issues o Coordinate with the Interfaith Council • Increase utilization of, and/or expanding availability of parenting classes for skill- building • Work with private sector to develop job training, mentoring and vocational opportunities • Improve mobility options for youth to access programs, services and facilities • Provide goal-setting, thinking and planning skills to help youth develop a better sense of direction o Utilize the Covey "7 Habits" system • Utilize youth support in organizing community events • Provide youth-focused drug and alcohol intervention, diversion and treatment services • Providing youth in alternative schools with equal opportunity to earn credits to earn higher education • Enhance school professionals' abilities to conduct mare proactive intervention o Expand partnership opportunities with community-based organizations o Increase school counseling capacity • Provide arts, crafts and textiles programs • Provide life skills training • Develop targeted programs and services o Target prevention efforts with middle school ages o Identify youth through schools, continuation schools, and service providers • Partner with schools to provide more community service opportunities o Civic engagement o Intergenerational sharing • Promote youth networking and socializing for special interests • Expand peer-based mentorship and support networks and services • Expand outreach of current programs and services to build awareness o Youth o Parents o Community organizations • Expand the Youth Accountability Team to intervene with first-time offenders • Develop additional sports and recreation activities that are less competitive • Utilize the right people to lead and inspire youth to participate in programs and services; hip and charismatic Prepared by Ml G, lnc. • Create new music performance activities: learning and concerts • Link creative arts with intervention activities {i.e., GAP} o Provide opportunities to showcase youths' work o Coordinate with social service providers such as PALS and SAFE • Expand youth theatre training • Provide creative arts opportunities, including classical and new media o Emphasize creativity, discipline, and skills development o Coordinate with educational curricula • Provide affordable options far all types of programs and services • Link learning and fun activities • Utilize parent and volunteer bases Opportunities • Create aone-stop resourcelclearinghouse to distribute information to providers and the community o Social, recreational, and cultural information o Serve as a communication conduit for the provider community o Avoid overlap of servicesleffarts • Emphasize an asset-building approach o Understand youth's needs, interest and talents o Channel negative behaviors into positive and meaningful opportunities • Avoid removing the "scary" youth from the system; provide consistent support • Utilize service providers' facilities for night programming • Establish an ongoing Advisory Council to guide YMP implementation • Pursue funding from foundations • Identify best practices from other communities Youth Involvement • Compare input from youth versus adults • Connect with youth through the school system • Listen to what youth want Prepared by Ml G, lnc. CITY OF TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN FOCUS GRGUPS {Yt~UTH} May 18, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION On April 24 and May 17, 2007, Moore lacofano Galtsman, Inc. (MIG} conducted 5 focus groups with Temecula youth and teens as part of early outreach efforts far the Youth Master Plan. Interviewees included youth from various schools and organizations identified by staff members from the Community Services Department of the City of Temecula. These youth represented a range of interests and experience, and were outreached through: • Temecula Valley High School • Rancho Vista High School • SAFE • Teen Council The following is a synapsis of findings organized by the thematic areas that emerged during interviews, including: • Community Strengths and Assets • Issues and Challenges • Community Facilities • Programs and Services • Outreach to Youth Community Strengths and Assets • Community characteristics: o Safe; no gangs o Relaxing, peaceful o Small town feel o Everyone knows each other o Youth-friendly o clean • Community facilities: o Parks o Water park o Library Prepared by MIG, l nc. o Bike and skate o Theatre o Open gym • Regional location • Mall and movie theatre • Programs and services ~~ community sports; AYSO • Restaurants Issues and Challenges General • Bared, nothing to do • Few transportation/mobility options, especially for younger youth. o High casts • Alcohol and drug use o Occurring in middle schools o More drugs in Temecula than other communities o Easy to get o Under-appreciated by parents • Limited access to athletics/recreation opportunities at school; highly competitive o Private clubs are costly o "Cliques" and exclusivity • Parents are not involved with youth o Single-parent families o Oblivious to youth actions and whereabouts • Police harassment of youth, particularly of youth fitting specific profileslstereatypes • Few local job opportunities o Youth o Parents; farces commuting • Paor inter-group or clique communication • Need people to talk to; counseling • Excessive rules targeting youth at mall • Supporting youth who are not "college-bound" • Parent pressures: grades, driving • Learning how to transition from youth to adulthood o Leading to acting out, or drug use • Night curfew • Community growth and traffic congestion • Teachers don't teach • New youth not well integratedlconnected in the community • Lack motivation/desire to work to achieve • Balancing school, activities and jabs • Affordability of activities, programs and services • Unfounded, poor reputation of youth in continuation school Prepared by Ml G, lnc. • Lack of activities for youth in continuation school • Parties and social events ruined by a few bad youth Community Facilities • Provide a teen place: o Open to all youth ages o Safe and secure o Affordable o Chaperoned by young adults o Operated by youth o Centrallacatian o Variety of food and cafes o Variety of activities: arcade, dancing, music o Skating rink o Bowling o Internet/computers o Rack climbing • Vltater parks, amusements Programs and Services • Provide community-based projects that support society and are fun • Sponsor family-based events o Circus, fair, block parties o Conduct outreach and advertise o Movie nights • Music programming o Learning instruments o Attending concerts • Dances and concerts • Intramural-based sports and recreation • Theatre and arts programs • Provide more work/job opportunities that are fun and build a sense of responsibility o Conduct outreach • Provide excursions trips for youth and families • Promote(advertise programs and services through schools • Drug/alcohol counseling services o Peer-based o Non-religious affiliation • Affordable • Locate programs at schools for easy access • Interesting classes for skills development: welding, wood shop, auto, ceramics, graphic design • Peer counseling and tutoring services Prepared by Ml G, lnc. Outreach to Youth • Have exciting leaders • School-based announcements o Morning public address system • Advertisements in movie theatres that roll before movies • Mall • Web-based: MySpace • Youth-serving businesses: Jamba Juice, Starbucks • Word of mouth Prepared by Ml G, lnc. CITY OF TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS May 4, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Between April 17 and April 24, 2007, Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG} conducted 12 confidential interviews as part of early outreach efforts for the Youth Master Plan (YMP}. Interviewees included civic leaders and key stakeholders identified by staff members from the Community Services District of the City of Temecula. These interviewees represented a range of community interests and experience, including members of: • City Council, including the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem; • Executive staff of the City of Temecula • Temecula Valley Unified School Board • Executive staff of TVUSD • Community-based organizations that serve Temecula's youth and teens The following is a synopsis of findings organized by the thematic areas that emerged during interviews, including: • Overall Themes • Community Strengths and Assets • Issues and Challenges facing: o All youth o Specific youth segments o Parents • Community Facilities • Programs and Services • Partnerships and Resources • Opportunities • Youth Involvement Overall Themes • The YMP should involve the entire community, but should focus on involving Temecula's youth and listening to their needs and interests • Many resources, programs, services, facilities, and agencies currently exist in the community that contribute to making Temecula a special place. Prepared by MIG, lnc. 1 o New levels of partnerships and coordination could further expand the utilization of these facilities The community has a history of being civic-minded, partnership-based and action-oriented to create positive change in the community Overcoming youth boredom and providing new alternatives and choices are important for: o Diverting from making poor choices including alcohol, drugs and gangs o Building on youths' skills and interests beyond the traditional, mandated education curriculum o Preparing youth for the transition to adulthood with a wider range of opportunities o Supporting parents who have limited time with and availability to their youth due to growing economic pressures and commute times While all youth deserve and need the community's support and consideration, specific segments of the youth population may need focused attention including youth with one or more of the following characteristics: o academically poor-performing o "latch key" o homeless and faster care o low-self esteem o not within the social and cultural "mainstream" 0 off the "college-bound" track o low/zero financial resources A new youth and teen placelvenue/village that features a wide range of activities, extended hours, youth employment opportunities, financially and location- accessible, and appeals to the widest possible interests of the community's youth is worth considering in this planning process o Additional specialized facilities that are recreation-oriented and interactive may be of value to youth A good foundation of programs, services and providers currently exist in the community. Potential new or expanded programs and services include: o Sports programs that provide alternatives to highly competitive and restrictive school-based teams, and are focused more an fun and participation and lesson competition o Arts and music programs that develop skills, as well as youth and family programs for listening/viewing (e.g., concerts, movies in the park} o Mentoring o Vocational training o Community service Acting on and implementing the community's vision will necessitate acommunity- wide effort: o Involving the full range of community agencies and organizations including the City, nonprofits, faith-based organizations, schools, as well as a range of resource o Considering and utilizing a range of resources from all partners and users Prepared by Ml G, lnc. Community Strengths and Assets • Community characteristics: o Family-friendly o Safe and secure o Generous o Dedicated to community enhancement o Action-oriented o Partnership-oriented o Resource-rich o Small-town feel • Involved business community • Strong civic and community leadership • Talented and active senior citizens • Proactive public safety agencies • Community facilities: o Teen room at the CRC o Library o parks • School-based programs • Recreation and athletic programs • Support programs: o Scouts o Bays & Girls Club o YMCA • Sister-city program • Support systems for at-risk youth • Community events Issues and Challenges General • Qvercoming youth boredom and the "there's nothing to do" environment o Increasing financial challenges for families to afford activities, education and other basic needs of youth and teens o Providing youth with adequate positive alternatives and choices • Lack of athletic opportunities as youth and teens age due to increasing competitiveness with school-based athletics and limited spaces • Bullying of "non-mainstream" kids for not conforming to youth pressures o Verbal attacks impacting youth and teens self esteem • Lack of opportunities and resources for a broader array of opportunities for all youth • Lack of mability(transportation options and financial resources, particularly youth under-16 • Increasing occurrences of destructive behavior such as drugs and abuse • Understanding how to share resources with adjacent communities to provide seamless services and programs Prepared by MI G, lnc. 3 • Increasing incidence of gang activity • Enforcing trafi:lc safety in school zones • Addressing unrealistic expectations that school programming and administrators can develop the "whole child" with limited resources and time • Appreciating and respecting the community's growing diversity o Addressing the needs of a growing Latino community o Understanding new social perspectives • 40°~ of the community is aged 19 and under with a disproportionate amount of programs and services to support them. • Sustaining the positive community characteristics in the short and long terms given the continued growth • Fostering courage, creativity and risk to address challenges and undertake non- traditional initiatives to support youth • Increasing parents' connection with the community given their limited time and energy from long commutes and work responsibilities • Framing the key issues and challenges clearly o Acknowledging that all can't be solved • overcoming the medialentertainment-saturated environment with active, productive options o Working with youth's fascination with technology • Making Temecula more desirable as a place for youth to stay and live o Higher education opportunities o Affordable living arrangements Specific Youth Interviewees suggested that specific segments of youth and teens may need additional focus as part of the process: • Teens who drop-out of school and are difficult to track • Students in alternative education settings who exhibit high-risk factors • Homeless and foster youth and teens who lack significant or any parental oversight • "Have Hots"-those with little resources to afford costly programs and services • "Latch-key" youth with weak family structures: o Parents work and commute long hours o Single parents • Special education students • Physically-challenged and disabled • Youth and teens interested in artistic and musical endeavours • Youth not on the "college-bound" track; providing them with resources and alternatives o Supporting 17-23 year olds in the youth-to-adult transition o Considering local higher education opportunities • Youth with low self-esteem who act out with destructive behaviors Parents Prepared by Ml G, lnc. • Both parents working full-time o Little time to spend with youth o Little ability to track youth's whereabouts and activities • Increasing commute distances and travel time • Lacking parenting skills • Lack of awareness of available support resources Community Facilities • Creating aplace/venue/village for youth to "hang-aut" o Welcoming, accepting, respecting of all backgrounds o Provides engaging activities {e.g., games, theatres, concerts, bookstores, etc.) o Utilizes public/private investment o Secure and safe o Designed and managed by youth o Flexible to keep pace with changing interests Creating places for youth with a range of options o Homework clubs o Activities {e.g., chess) Utilizing current facilities o City-based o Interfaith groups o TVUSD Creating new facilities that are interactive and recreation-oriented o Roller rink o Bowling o Water park o Community gardens o Natural environment {e.g., hiking) Music and concerts • Ensuring accessibility to facilities o Providing transportation services o Locating opportunities throughout the community in neighborhoods o Maintaining affordability • Expanding the amount of turf fields • Exploring public/private partnerships o New facilities o Expanding use of current facilities • Linking youth-oriented facilities development to economic development goals • Providing spaces for community-based organizations and programs who do not have their own Programs and Services • Conduct outreach to build awareness of current programs and services: o Youth o Parents Prepared by Ml G, lnc. o Community organizations • Provide new opportunities for less-competitive athletics that are fun, engaging and exciting o Featuring coaches and sponsorships o Modeled on Temecula Youth Basketball Association • Educate the community on acceptance of all interests and backgrounds to address minimize social pressures to conform and encourage youth and teens' self-acceptance and esteem. • Build awareness among youth and adults about the impact of youth's poor choices now {e.g., drugs, tobacco and alcohol} leading to larger troubles in the future o Consider programs such as "Every 15 Minutes" o Drug diversion programs • Providing low or zero cast options • Creating programs and services that link into youth and teens community service needs and provide meaningful, sustained learning opportunities o Community service o Internships • Provide new vocational opportunities {e.g., autos) that are fun, interesting, and build lifelong skills • Develop mentaring programs-youth helping youth o Big Brothers/Sisters o Temecula Raises Readers • Facilitate involvement in civic and local government process • Consider a range of activities: o Arts o Technology • Increasing utilization of, andlor expanding availability of parenting classes for skill-building • Building on current successful programs o YMCA o Boys & Girls Club o Scouts o Interfaith groups o PAL • Expand music and arts programming o Activities and programs o Concerts o Family events • Facilitate new and creative opportunities for expression {e.g., graffiti as art} o Emphasize social rewards and recognition Partnerships and Resources • County officials and departments o Addressing connections to outlying neighborhoods o Social and human services Prepared by MI G, lnc. 6 • Expanding joint coordination between TVUSD and the City • Community based organizations-particularly those that do not normally partner o Facilitate new coordination and inter-mingling of "cliques" • Interagency Council • Utilizing city resources • Creating programs with user fees • Avoid pursuing grants as this community cannot compete due to relative affluence • Emphasize amixed-resource approach • Increasing partnerships with interfaith community • Focus on utilizing current revenues Opportunities • Establish a dedicated, full-time staff position focused on: o Implementing the Youth Master Plan o Serving as the community's coordination point and clearinghouse for information about youth development programs and services • Communicating and building a community ethic of mutual responsibility and a safety net far all youth that avoids blaming parents, schools and others. • Encompass the entire community in the planning process to build commitment in caring for the community's youth and teens • Emphasize an asset-building approach o Build on the "Healthy Kids" survey data available through TVUSD • Emphasize innovation and creativity that goes beyond predictable solutions and attends to youths' desires and needs Youth Involvement • Connect with the shy, disenfranchised, disengaged and silent youth who do not participate in these planning efforts. o Enlist support of teachers to identify these youth • Emphasize alistening-oriented, non-judgmental approach to involving youth • Utilize/create student-based advisory boards • Partner with Rotary Club's "Rotary Youth Leadership Awards" • Partner with interfaith community to engage youth • Take a "stealth" approach to building involvement that gives youth ownership of the process. • Increase participation in City Council activities and sessions • Engage in the County's Youth summit to build youth camaraderie and leadership skills • Conduct outreach through youth-serving community organizations Prepared by Ml G, lnc. CITY OF TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 May 17, 2007 SUMMARY REPORT INTRODUCTION On Thursday, May 17, 2007, over 150 youth/teen and adult residents of Temecula participated in a community workshop far the Temecula Youth Master Plan {YMP}. The workshop objectives included: 1. Educate the community about the purpose of and process for the YMP. 2. Facilitate and record participants' comments regarding available community assets that support youth development, as well as issues and challenges facing youth today. 3. Generate feedback from adults and youth separately to identify similarities and differences in beliefs and understandings. 4. Facilitate crass-generational sharing and discussions to faster development of shared visions. At arrival, participants signed in at the registration table near the main entry of the meeting room. Participants received an agenda packet with the agenda for the workshop and a discussion worksheet, as well as a copy of the YMP questionnaire. Youth and adult participants received different questionnaires. Participants were encouraged to complete the questionnaire during the registration period, but could complete it any time during the event. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Esmeralda Garcia of Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. {MIG) served as the meeting facilitator and welcomed participants to the event. She introduced Mayor Chuck Washington, who introduced the YMP and described how important it will be to the community. Ms. Garcia then gave a brief overview of the workshop agenda and activities, emphasizing the primary objective of the workshop - to involve community members, particularly youth, in developing the YMP -and explaining how participants might use the discussion worksheet to give additional feedback. PRESENTATION: WHAT IS THE YOUTH MASTER PLAN? Andy Pendoley of MIG then presented a 10-minute PowerPoint slideshow with background information about the YMP. The presentation answered the following questions: • What is the YMP? Prepared by MIG, Inc. Al City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 • Why is this important? What are the conditions driving this process? • What is the process for developing the YMP, and who is involved? • How will tonight's meeting inform the process? Ms. Garcia then asked for questions or comments from the audience regarding the process before advancing the workshop to the small group discussions. This summary includes a brief description of the workshop's activities and the results. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS -Part 1: Assets, Issues, and Challenges Participants sat at small group tables situated around the roam, which were randomly assigned by participants' pre-coded name tags. Each group contained 6- 10youth or 6-1 Q adults and was led by a volunteer facilitator who guided participants through an open discussion. Each facilitator explained the format and agenda of the session and asked for self-introductions. The facilitator reviewed the following ground rules for the session: • Having an open discussion where there are no right/wrong commentslanswers; • Respecting everyone's comments and opinions. Participants were asked about some of the positive and negative aspects of Temecula for the youth population, and the following is a summary of their answers. Participants were also provided with a discussion worksheet featuring the same questions that they could answer in writing and return to MIG, and these responses are included in the summary below: 1Nhat makes Temecula a positive place far youth and teens? {Youth responses) • The Vault {15} • Safety (1 tJ} • Clean (7} • Mall {6} • Community Recreation Center (4) • Sports opportunities (3} • There are places to go, things to do (3} • Movies (3} • Good location, close to other things (2} • Opportunities for creative expression (2) • Fun {2} • CRC skate park (2} • Church and church groups (2} • Additional places to go: o Plenty of restaurants o Library o XDC video games/cafe o Battlezone at Rancho Prepared by MIG, Inc. A2 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 o Rollerrin o Places to hear music • It's young, still growing, doesn't have a reputation yet • Kids from other cities are coming here • Many people care about us, and the young are always growing with the population • Good schools • Nice neighborhood • Comfortable place to live What makes Temecula a positive place for youth and teens? (Adult responses) • Arts/creative expression (19} • Organized activitiesJprograms {11) • Leadership and service opportunities (10) • Safety {9) • Good schools/teachers {9) • Sports opportunities (9} • Parkslopen space (9) • CRC {7} • Faith-based opportunities (5) • Jobs (4) • The Vault {4} • Family-oriented/friendly community (3) • Library (3} • Diverse community {3) • The Mall (3} • Lots to do (3} • Diversity {2} • Adult volunteers/organizations {2) • Tutoring programs (2) • Clean (2) • Police presence (2) • Forward-thinking • Miscellaneous places to ga: o Starbucks o Hang-out spots - Mulligans, restaurants o Dance clubs o Rallerskating o Gaming centers • Brand new/young community • Good place to became a homeowner • Mass transit • Animal control Prepared by MIG, Inc. A3 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 What are the biggest challenges, struggles, issues and pressures experienced by Temecula's youth today? (Youth responses) • Nothing to do, nowhere to go (12} • Drugs and alcohol (7} • Police and curfew (3) • Not enough to do late at night (3) • No places to play music (3) • Lack of transportation options {2} • Lack of security to control fights at The Vault (2) • School {2) • Lack of things to do far 18- to 21-year-olds • No places to ride bikes • Lack of volleyball and basketball for girls • Too many people coming -soon there will be problems like San Diego and LA • Hard to find kids that are into the same things as I am -activism, humanitarianism • Parents • Being peer pressured by friends. • Rights of teens • Youth ideas and opinions are not heard by ar valid to adults • A lot of focus on Temecula being "pretty" What are the biggest challenges, struggles, issues and pressures experienced by Temecula's youth today? (Adult responses) • The police/curfew (13) • Lack of transportation options {11) • Lack of things to dolplaces to go (9) • Drugs/Alcohol {7} • Peer pressurelsocial issues {6) • Not enough quality family time (6} • Safety (4) • School/learning environment (4} • Peer pressure {3) • No preventative programs {2) • Growing diversity {2} • Lack of post-secondary education options {2) • Jabs (2) • Zoning restrictions {2) • Lack of opportunities for creative expression (2} • Lack of sports opportunities (2) • Lack of jab training • Family conflict • Communication regarding upcoming events Prepared by MIG, Inc. A4 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 What challenges are Temecula's parents facing today? (Youth responses) • DrugslAlcohol {11 } • Lack of respect/attitude {9} • Safetylgetting hurt (7) • Unsafe teen drivers (3} • Boredom/lack of activities {2) • STDs • Threats at schools • Peer pressure • Bad parenting What challenges are Temecula's parents facing today? (Adult responses) • Breakdown of familial relationshipslgeneration gap (6} • Lack of quality family time {especially from commuting for work} {5) • Safety (3} • Commuting (3} • Cultural adaptation {3) • Boredom of children (2) • Financial burdens of activities {2} • Schools (2} • Social dynamics amongst children (2) • Discipline • Transportation options • Affordable child care • Nutrition/healthy food options • The Vault • Relationship between kids and police • Large groups of youth are frightening "WALKAROUND" At the end of Part 1, Ms. Garcia asked participants to leave their tables and walk around the room, reviewing the flipchart pages posted by all the small groups. SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS -Part 2: Shared Visions Ms. Garcia then asked participants to join a different small group table. She asked participants to form groups with an even number of youth and adults, with different participants than the previous discussion, and with people who did not know each other. Each group was led by a volunteer facilitator who guided participants through an open discussion. A volunteer recorder recorded comments on flipchart pages. Each facilitator asked for self-introductions and for each person to state the one mast surprising theme ar comment they read during the walkaround. The facilitator then explained the visioning exercise, which asked participants to co-author a newspaper Prepared by MIG, Inc. A5 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 article from the year 2017 that describes life in Temecula for youth. The facilitator asked participants to reflect on discussion points thus far and to brainstorm what the newspaper would report about a new, improved, and perfected community for Temecula youth, with the following questions: • What are the community's major accomplishments by 2017 related to youth development? • When traveling through all areas of the community, what does the report see that's a positive change for youth and teens? o What 1-2 pictures would the newspaper include with the article? • What has changed to help youth and teens better able to deal with their personal struggles and pressures? • When the report interviews a wide range of youth and teens about the activities and programs that they enjoy, what do the youth and teens describe? • What positive aspects have not changed, or have become even better in the last 10 years? After discussing these questions, the facilitator then asked the group to summarize the brainstorm into a rough newspaper article to be reported to the entire group by a volunteer youth reporter. The following is a summary of their responses to the questions and to the newspaper exercise: • Teenlyouth-oriented places far creative expression (music venue, etc.) {17} • Safe, fun, affordable places for youth and teens to go (11 } • Improved adult-youth relationships/respect {9) • Safety issues (gangs, violence, etc.} {9) • Improving transportation options {8} • Artslcultural events and facilities {8) • Jabs and jab training (7} • The Vault (7} • Communication opportunities (forums, newsletters, etc.) (7} • Sports facilities and activities (6} • Teen-controlled enterprises {business, activities} {6} • Past-secondary education opportunities {6} • Community centers and organized activities (5} • Things for teenslyouth to do at night {5} • Improved educational environment {4} • Embracing diversity (4) • More family-oriented values and time (3} • Decreased drug/alcohol use (3) • Open space/natural resources (3) • Abetter mall (3} • Economic development (3} • Skate parks {3} • Bowling alley (3) Prepared by MIG, Inc. A6 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 • Leadership and service opportunities (2} • Better relationship with authority (2} • Increased faith-based opportunities (2) • Limiting growth of the city (2} • Bridging the generational gap Newspaper headlines • Slogans: o The City of Dreams o Terrific "T" Town o Small Town, Big Ideas o There's a Little "LA" in TemecuLA • "Despite the tremendous growth, Temecula has collaborated with all areas of the community and red tape has been streamlined." • "Ten years ago, Temecula was a boring city. But now it's the greatest city ever!" • "Temecula Youth Shapes Path for Nation" • Youth describe 2017 life: o I designed/created o Tons of accessible activities o "I can go anywhere" o "I can express myself' o "Family recreation opportunities" o "Multi-generational interaction" "2017 citizens realize that an investment in youth is an investment into the community. Record numbers of teens continue their education and return to raise families here -because it is a safe place where any race can be happy! The City is a small town with afamily-minded community. A place where anyone can open a business and succeed -without the big corporations shutting you dawn. A woman mayor running the show, recently graduating from UC Temecula. Teens working hand in hand with a voice to our government. Beautiful housing for everyone -Temecula is a leading city to bridge the gap of poor and the wealthy. An establishment of public forum, giving the people a voice." "Ten Year Aftermath: We're back after 10 years. We now have a more diversified community. We have educational centers. We have better infrastructure, more roads, the gang activity has been controlled. Rising Dlympic contenders have been in training." REPORTS FROM SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS After the small group discussions, all participants reconvened to hear the "newspaper articles" and other comments from the groups. Mr. Pendoley recorded ideas and common themes on a large wallgraphic paper, which illustrated and summarized emerging shared visions. Ms. Garcia also asked for general comments from participants. Prepared by MIG, Inc. A7 City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 ct_oslNc Ms. Garcia then thanked participants for participating and encouraged them to complete and leave comment forms with staff before leaving. Mayor Washington also gave a final thank-you and concluding remarks. DISCUSSION 1Nt~RKSHEETS Some participants submitted additional comments about the workshop or YMP via discussion worksheets, which are summarized as follows: • Keep The Vault open! • Open The Vault! • The youth need music. But it doesn't have to come from the city's pocket. If the city relaxed and allowed private investors to open clubs and venues, the youth (and 20 something young professionals} will have something to do. • Great process, hearing youth ideas/ideals, opportunity to talk encouraging • We are more alike (regardless of age} than we are different • Emphasis on education, post-secondary education, arts, cultural, better infrastructure far transportation, family banding places and times are important • Need skate board parks to prevent school vandalism Prepared by MIG, Inc. A8 uth questionnaire ~ ~ ~ - City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshon #1 Summary Reoort-May 17. 2007 z Lwnar.Ihe hr+1 a,..Y iar I«.d vamh In zrl ininnn.mm~ shout laa l artiritie. or menu! y ~ `.' 1~ n R~ ~ R^ .*rl'V•l wM r /~ ,.~. ~ J. Hoaa Jo vnu u.ualh~ µel around Temn Wt I L Ln 9 Lmm f v ~ , 5 GH rz - ~.. ~~. ,'~ Ll n~.inm~ e•rn r.. ~ x~a.. .. ...... C.r,r... t J.Hnw uid are y m! ,. I irel sa@ in Trnxrula. v ~ _ _ sy~,.. ._ S Go-:: b~cv:; lu E:erccr 5p~rply C.+apee 22 What are Ihr IoP Ihrer Ihmp Ih,d Ibe G W of &artr uM .hould do to ukrhe ILr [ uv a Ueller pLue for romL .mJ leen5l 2i. Wh.V i5 vanr yendrri I [..u:- 26. Wh.V is •our home iIP Todd _ .., ~ 1 5 6 06.r 1]. Wh.+l xfiuol da •nu m4ud# .+,q"_ L:.'.d1' 6 _ Terra.la Grrpaeu>ry ] _ T<n'fyr Va'ey B Cld rr Thank you fur parti<ipnling' 2. What are the lop Mo issues Ixing youth and teens in lemeru6r! _. ...~. I_ ~fG. 9 Snrr>g p.:Gd ®dtlY. E _ Lck N FI2nm ~ Lzk o!nw..Cy 8~ 4xk ul p':h 9 _ IJC o-aepwwwr. 10 _ IJOlhrng rn do m IFrrr hre nrrr I1 Pe pryy<n. peawm binm 12® PWlnuyp In IJr AIn nrEra=6ml 13 c proMmr, .v~ln rar..rs 19 _ prablme et ~'.;vl 15 QI -+ 16 ~ [bn 14r+.w 3. Wh.V i. mur Uigl}sl prrwnal hsuel 6. APPro.•inwrk hp.v aitrn in lhr l~N rzwon6l>Ir,nr,ou u.eA Ihr following par6 anJ r onnnunhr ix ililiec! V~un Pel Yenr nkrglkrmood Ddkln ynvr Pow eppl9 PYA TrmxWa 9~u Perk Ipmmuuly fl¢rcann C+nlx n:8(il iem.e In r'pn m rnny ~-.ntor (iCl~ ,Mlmmnf F~!pl (a A. G1'olaml Hph AmfiWa L-mrmzrv, IFO blunt Furpwa lrelh ]. li vau uw nll of Ihr part .nd f.n flit ire.Jraav fm. (f«n fi,w limas tn+!; tell Its wht •ou dant uas Ihenu ~C!>'~':?_ I J_Inc.r er.z~~,e~ ~n~n „ 5 _ IJ:.I .yell tilvri :ae ~I' d iw [:aw:Wd ]._ tw ha swat, nuo<onvarnmAy Ixetnd g Other 9 D:-;rkncw Prepared by MIG, Inc. Al 2 L Lsin8lhe li,l of ]U arli, ilie> ahocq ci¢le the EIVE utiailiavou woulJ moll tKE to rlo. ~~'- r+; ham= ~.. ~, ~, ~,~ ..I .nr I. I low nnm fwl and r and Think urr thrrr to da and go Io for •nulh nn<I ferns o(IemrruL,l ~~. ~. ~ +, 4'rn . .:. tt. C~_~. ~. _ _.. ~ L-ra [sue a ,rzlr a IJ~.IMnm el ell City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 A. Nhr4lwvrrdlfw (rR4rw~rg types rdplare:arenvaa rt •ded by wanb and 4xm hl ielnv u6! rlvreyn.r mr~. _ ,,. i.~i r~Jn=i.. g~, Jiralrr._J,rx..., ii,u. i.. ~.~ „l. wan.~n _I'.1\u.xl x a lnlrv~n ~nl l.rrlrnP I noniurR.dlcv _ LoVlm shop. 3 I)Jn[e n\Nlrl club; a ~54aung unA S _ M,T it IMarn~ G Uhtt s _ NVIi wrwu• lwrb Iwulllrrg, dlbµ hlAiryV G_ \tyL.ur• «v« wlron <enM~r IRVm, urea anv!, ur 11rlly Nxxry\ [•I( I A _ n.r+ghlvdlmd Vans 9 VaII11Wll Itl ~_ Icon rrll4'!r, a a Plxe luu tur Ircnr to harlRnw n _ Y.nv {art nn.dv4non In the rvn~ ne alnadv W.ro __ rr~..roromon arxl Jrn.rH raN,Le-an rxav4d `r. cabal rnbrngo-•u!r.rnwtiml and ulivily farilAfes would rnu wam• ~. ,n ;~'ILr,. m. Wb: M1 two nr Ihr hdhrwing SPORTS FACIEITIES are 1 needed by youth and leero in iemewla! '1lx.:A rJ!=lirrN,.. P..n.Vy~l, a16A In.ld-d,nn, rv.rl. I r~ L.,. r~i ~I,., .n r,.nr.,. J = <:r li J ~_`wlAxx 4n MIUAI cowls - SwmmnrrRpml. L_In prR y Ion lr.Ad-1-~...n. I.nr..•., Imvtlalr!<rI n Ylllrcr- In .i~l l,~n,r 11. N'hh-h Iwo n(Ihe hdhrwirrR PROD RAMS OR SENVICES are m,.1 needed by youth amt teem in irm.. ula! ~l hed up P. nr v. t _ Ylnarrr In,rHrnnn I.wninrung. rula,n ~•.,;. r..w lone-_. nlrv ) __ ~.nx~ ,,,. I.olxrrve+cyprrtrlr„L~-~ t ur _ Irnlrnr a, In~rna~-nmcwmrNlv.e lµrrnna.,uni. glrne rrvxnr, cum{won, etc ~ _ lducanorul. helmd s[1r[d Ittlulrmrervs (-1wh -IIII.. s\I p.Yr, .ir r _Iln nnnnri rra rrrAnr .faralnn. lnrr+ra f. rYll L_Irv .. i rn' .i i,n ~n; nl fret, nr.unlnln.. Iv:n lr i„ nn.., r.,~.,. rn.,. r... x.r ..Jurml ] larrnn•rpxl~lml rlrmhirry(,rwtirq. wrnvlmm111q, ti[.I B _ I I!JV rvJh Mr'nnnl Ivullenn tru1W11. R~+. nr ullwp'An.r =.lur grurytll V lv+l+rrlaral +rrorlLa Aranup{,ucernrblp,n nrpnr ~rN.mpuwmr<+I I o_ fµ.r.J nnr4ldrwn.r r.vnl.ln Ro I.nl.4alhJr. et I I1._ Ckhw- 1 nex' Pnalram• am mvdwl IY p~nTlmw 11. N'hal rdlwr IYPrc of Program. w.ervilr. wualA Yrw warn! f ~.: iH' r„ Il=r,.,.. I T.In tlw Pmt, hare Ynv ever PlaYrd or%aai+ed team rpurl. .w Ir a. little IeaRUe, surer, hwlball, rn rrrlrer.! . i ar.i r,rlri. li. xr I ~n It \Yhal's the twin rea»n whY Yula dewy play nrganiRed IvmsporlY now! Iln.. i. nln _. I nfl anrrr u. lu,ngx~n+u' _ nit rn.lln nn'1='nnl al •~lrarl 3 _ lkml have barnwrUlmu i _ DurFl xJnl ro. nor rotor-ln anrwnn• r vln I!m I l u.~n u. If you ruuld Idn a rerrcafirwal .pro: prnRram that had »me nr all of Ihue kamre.-Imv Pero rml, Ames m+ nquirr regulnr prat lira, allow..rlb.rl«EinR Iranw, lightly nr wort onprlilive-wbir h n(Ihe fullnwinR .purl. rwld timr •erinwy umsider parlinpatinR! cap.., .. urn r.r_. 1 Il.rirn..n4,n 3. ea.laaMll a. lNrrc~..irurrrlronal s. InJpall 6 _ I rizhtt-'dlu' gill ] _ lacraee a _ n _ srx n+ k(IGdI I u sronnning _ I I _ table nvnvs. gnN'wnR 1:_ lrr r I l _ 1.14malr tn:lar 13_ \'rillrvWll 1 S. W'aler Imb IG llflltt I ] _ I wuuldnl lurlx Vale In Ihn Ivly` ul VnrjVnlrr In_ Ikrnt Arwn I(r. N'hwlr Iwo of the fnlnwinR ARTS AfM1D CDLiI.RAI PROGRAMS Ah'D fFR\'ICFS are yrw nunl inlvre.Yrd! , ir.. l .... •. L... _ __ t o.nr..r... n ..li .~ r. Ia.hln. 3_Illxr Mrxluc4rxr S _ M1lurrr OrNuclron L_ \lusif Pedunnan[e > PmnnnR e~INxurngraPhv 9 _ Rcxlmil Irt_ XuhAUn' 11 _ \ rsurl 1? 1\Ilnnli Ir ra•atlr.~ w Ixx4v1 1i rltn,.r tA_ rn. rJ rM1.. al+n. t rrli r 4rnm tl. N7rere would you gn fin wunh and seen pruRranrc! x In'J. urn. I-r.vnmuuu <,rl, fanM1L~.vI I,..p.rluunll., iuy;vYi~n.nr knx, .I, r ] -__ RernJ.tlnPynR ve.a a Sclxul s _ bcn Ceger ]_11xi r llr,m IA.\mu•.r d. yrw nnvdr harg-..w m rnnw nln in root rrr.• bow±-r L,. r..n.. ..n... -I„q. wJi rnn~,~.r r,,ar. 1_ V. lunx~ _ nls IrieM's Irwne G r<rRlJxnhod cad r ~_ old horn L _ s<I'xul I.n4'r In •xr.r _ Sl.alr Ir•nl _ (Idnv {lrnr lotto lu.I( Ww (relryemly Ro rwtx'vle of Temerul+ Lr IvnFud, where M Pw Rn! I ~rrh tart nrgel.urrnr _ Crreorl >w IM.yy . rwmm+ 1 1_rnlra Nnenldf CWnty ---<hM L Idrnlgo ou414ed lmmrnr/aroharg.VUt J ~ I~m't 4row Prepared by MIG, Inc. A2 :p. WIR'n the tnllowirA; artlvillu are awillablo nr lmxuoP, Inw many limes In a Nlklay {R'rilAf rkr you Iwrlidpole m Yon avnain+Glr WP6r+mf 1P.'rn nll ur ~Ilr~lm,. rizu.rlgrlr. Youth Questionnaire Data Summary Questionnaire Response Data -YOUTH QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Haw many fain and cool things are there to da and go to far youth and teens of Teineeula? - VerST Little - 49.6% - Don't knot~r In between - 22.3% - Just enough - 12.0% - Nothing at all - 11.2% - Alot-4.9% 2. What are the top two issues facing youth and teens in Temecula? - Drugs - 17.0% - Nothing to do in their free time - 15.0°,% - Alcohol - 14.4°,% - Peer pressure/pressure to fit in - 7.9% - Getting good grades - 6.1% - No transportation; can't get around easily - 5.9% - Bullying or ~Tiolence from other youth and teens - 5.1% - Problems with parents - 4.7% - Planning far life after high school - 4.3% - Lack of money - 4.0% - Problems at school - 3.$% - Lack ofjobs - 3.5% - Gangs - 3.2°io - Don't know - 2.6% - Lack of friends - 1.4% - Sex - 0.6°io - Cops - 0.3% - Lack of respect - 0.1% - Personal issues (e.g. self-confidence, image} - 0.1% - Not enough skate parks - 0.1°io 3. What is your biggest personal issue? - Boredom - 22.9°,% - School/grades - 17.7% - Social dynamics/friends - 9.6% - Family - $.5°~0 - 1~Zoney - 6.70% - Transportation - 4.4% - Personal issues (e.g. self-confidence, image) - 4.4% - The fiittzre (e.g. college, after high school) - 3.5% - Jab opportunities - 3.5% - Curfeurj`cops~'security g~.iards - 3.3% - Peer pressure - 2.5% - Drugs - 1.5% - Alcohol - 1.5% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 1 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Opposite sex - 1.3% - Gangs - 0.8% - Not enough places to do what Iwant - 0.8% - Sex - 0.6% - Ignorance of community - 0.6% - Loneliness - 0.6% - Too busy - 0.6% - Parties - 0.6% - Trouble focusing - 0.6% - Safety - 0.4% - Stress - 0.4% - The Vault - 0.4% - Athletic performance - 0.4% - Laziness - 0.4% - Parties - 0.2% - Dance skills - 0.2% - Lack of nighttime activities - 0.2% - HIV~'STDs - 0.2% - Lack of responsibility - 0.2% - Religion - 0.2°/0 4. How do you usually get around Temecula? - Parent/guardian drives me - 54.5% - Drive myself - 20.9% - Ride with other teens - 7.7% - ~Xlalk - 6.4% - Bike - 5.5% - Skateboard, rollerblade, scooter - 4.5% - Take the bus - 0.4% 5. I feel safe in Terneeula (agree jdisagree}. - Agree - 51.1% - Don't know/In between - 22.3% - Strongly agree - 20.0% - Disagree - 4.9% - Strongly disagree - 1.7% G. How often in the last year have you used the following parks and cornrnunity facilities? Percentage ofresporlderats ~vho say theyl2ave gone at least once in the last year: - Neighborhood park in your area - 61.9% - Sports Park - 55.3% - Swimming pool - 15.2% - Community recreation center - 38.4% - Concert venue - 10.9% - Multi-purpose trails - 37.7% - Temecula skate park - 26.1% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 2 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Temecula community center - 31.7% Percentage ofrespondents iiTho... - Have never been to any of the facilities - 5.6% - Have been to at least one of the facilities more than 12 times in the past year 35.3°,'0 7. If you use all of the above facilities less than five times a year, tell us ~vhy you don't use them. - Not enough things to do/Boring - 30.0% - Not enough time - 16.6% - Don't know= - 15.9% - Too far away, not conveniently located - 13.9% - Not aware of parks and facilities - 10.6% - Feel unsafe - 3.7% - Too crowded - 2.$% - Cops are there - 2.1% - Not well taken care of - 1.9% - Not "cool" - 1.6% - Nowhere good to skate - 0.7% - Lack of good bathrooms - 0.2% - Can't ride my bike - 0.2% S. Which two of the following types of places are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receiving at least I.0% of total responses: - Dance%night clubs - 16.2% - Bowling alley - 10.7% - Entertainment facilities - 10.5°,% - Teen center, or a place just for teens to hangout - 9.7% - Skating rink - 89% - Arts center] facility {e.g. theatre, dance, music, fashion, visual, cultural) - 6.2 - Paintball - 5.5% - Movie theatres - 4.9% - Areas for special events and festivals - 4.9% - Skate park {in addition to the one we already have) - 3.8% - BMX track - 3.6% - Multi-use recreation center {bym, social areas, activity rooms, etc.) - 3.3% - Natural areas - 2.4% - Coffee shops - 2.2% - Multi-purpose trails (walking, biking, hiking) - 1.4% - Don't knour - 1.4% - Neighborhood parks - 1.1% All responses, categorized: - Entertainment - 27.3% - Sports - 22.8% - Partying~'socializing - 16.2% - Hangout - 15.1 °,% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 3 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Cult<ral - 11.2% - Retail - 0.4% - Outdoor - 4.9% - Other - 2.1°,% 9. What other types of recreation and actitrity facilities would you want? Answers receiving at least 1. ~1% of total responses: - Night clubs/dance clubs - 11.3% - Water park - 8.3% - Ice skating rink - 8.0% - Amusement park - 7.8% - Shopping/mall - 6.6°/0 - Bowling alley - 5.3% - Sports facilities - 5.2% - Concert venue - 5.1% - Swimming pool - 4.6% - Skate park - 3.7% - Parks/open space - 3.6% - Teen center - 3.0% - Teen gym - 2.8% - Arts center - 2.2% - Teen-only hang-outs - 2.2% - B1U11Y trails - 2.2% - Movie theatre - 1.9% - Paintball - 1.9% - Gaming center - 1.$% - Coffee house - 1.7% - Arcade - 1.3°,% - Dirt bike course - 1.1% - Places for eventsifestivals - 1.1% All responses, categorized: - Sports - 32.8% - Entertainment - 31.9% - Partying~'Socializing - 11.8% - Retail - 7.0% - Hangout - 6.9% - Cultural - 4.7% - Outdoor - 3.7% - Other - 1.3% 10. ~~'hich two of the folio«Ting sports facilities are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receririr~~~ at least 1.0% of total responses: - Swimming pools - 19.3°/0 - Turf fields (soccer, lacrosse, football, etc.) - 18.5% - Gymnasiums - 13.9% - Don't know - 10.4°io - Outdoor basketball courts - 9.6% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 4 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Baseball, softball fields/diamonds - 7.8% - Tennis courts - 6.4% - No new sports facilities are needed - 4.0% - Frisbee or disc golf course - 3.5% - Skate park - 1.5°,% - Ice skating rinks - 1.4% - Volleyball courts - 1.2°io 11. ~~'hich two of the folio«ring programs or services are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receririn~~ at least 1.0% of total responses: - Excursions,~trips (amusement parks, mountains, beach, etc.) - 18.6% - Special events (dances, concerts in the park, festivals, etc.) - 15.8°,% - Extreme sports (rock climbing, surfing, snowboarding, etc.) - 14.1% - Aquatic programs {suerimming, scuba diving, water fitness, etc.) - 10.0% - Job-related activities (training, internship, or employment opport<.inities) - 9.9 - Drop-in activities -noncompetitive (gymnasium, game room, computers, etc.) - 9.4% - Community service (volunteer opportunities) - 7.0°,% - Educational, beyond school requirements {study skills, SAT prep, etc. - 4.8% - Environmental programs {nature programs, etc.) - 3.0% - Help ~vith personal problems (support, peer, or talking/discussion groups) - 2.9 °/o - Don't know - 2.7°,% - No new programs are needed - 1.5% All responses, categorized: - Entertainment - 28.0% - Sports - 24.3% - Cultural - 19.0% - Job-related - 9.9% - Personal development - 9.9% - Educational - 4.8% - Other - 4.2% 12. What other types of programs or services would you want? Answers receivrrlg at least I.0% of total responses: - Sports - 10.4% - 1lusic. - 10.4% - Extreme sports - 9.4% - Dance - 7.$°,% - Job-related - 7.0% - Special events - 6.0% - Aquatics (e.g. pool, water park} - 5.7% - Educational {e.g. tutoring, homework help, test prep} - 5.5% - Volunteering/community service - 4.7% - Art - 4.2% - Field trips - 3.7% Prepared by MIG, Inc. Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Environmental - 3.4% - Skate park - 3.1% - Night club - 2.9% - Counseling- 1.6% - Clubs/organized activities - 1.6% - Amusement park - 1.6% - Video gaming/internet - 1.3% - Health-related - 1.0% - Courses (e.g. cooking, arts and crafts, auto repair - 1.0% All responses, cateb~orized: - Entertainment - 28.0% - Sports - 38.1°/0 - Entertainment - 18.5% - Cultural - 11.2% - Educational - 10.7% - Personal development - 7.6% - Jab-related - 7.3°,% - Partying~'Socializing-2.9% - Hangout - 1.6% - Affordable - 0.8% - Outdoor - 0.5% - Other - 0.8% 13. In the past, have you ever played organized team sports such as little league, soccer, football, or others? - Yes - 69.8°ro - No - 30.2°,/0 14. What's the main reason why you don't play organized team sports nosy? - Don't want to; not interested anymore - 29.6°io - Too busy; not enough time - 26.9% - Can't afford it; too expensive - 19.9% - Don't know - 9.9% - Don't have transportation - 4.3% - Can't make the team at school - 3.2% - No teams available - 2.7% - Health problems - 0.8% - Age requirements - 0.5% - Bad facilities - 0.5% - Too competitive - 0.5% - Don't knouT about options - 0.3% - Can't use drugs if on a team - 0.3% - Didn't like the people - 0.3% - Grades aren't good enough - 0.3% 15. If you could join a recreational sports program ... which of the following sports would you seriously consider? Answers receiving at least 1.0% of total responses: Prepared by MIG, Inc. 6 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Soccer - 10.4% - Football - 9.2% - Basketball - 8.7% - Swimming - 8.7% - Badminton - 7.1% - Ultimate frisbee - 6.8% - Volleyball - 6.1% - Fitness/nutritional - 6.0% - Lacrosse - 4.8% - Softball - 4.8°io - Baseball - 4.6% - Water polo - 4.4% - Table tennis, ping-pong - 3.2% - Tennis - 3.1% - Don't know - 2.0% - I wouldn't participate in this type of program - 1.8% - Frisbee/disc golf - 1.7% - Dance - 1.1% 16. Which taro of the follotiving arts and cultural programs and services are you most interested in? Answers reeerving at least 1.0% of total responses: - Dance - 15.2% - Photography - 14.0% - Music production - 9.0% - Film production - 8.5% - Fashion - 8.3% - Music performance - 7.8% - Drama/acting/theatre - 7.4% - Computergraphics - 5.5% - Painting - 4.2% - tX~riting (creative or poetry) - 4.2% - Reading - 4.0% - None of the above - 3.3% - Don't know - 3.2% - Visual - 2.4% - Sculpture - 2.0% 17. Where would you go for youth and teen programs? - School - 21.1% - Don't knou7 - 20.9% - Teen center - 18.8% - Retail/shopping area - 14.4% - Community center - 12.1°% - Faith-based - 10.1% - Outdoors/Neighborhood park facility - 1.7% - Parties - 0.4% - Movie theatre - 0.4°,/0 Prepared by MIG, Inc. 7 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - San Diego - 0.2°,% 18. Where do you mostly hang-out in Temecula in your free time? Answers reeervrr2g at least 1. (I % of total responses: - It,1y home - 32.4% - Mall - 27.2% - ~-Iy friend's home - 25.0% - Coffee shop - 2.8% - Neighborhood park - 2.4% - Don't knour - 2.4% - School (after hours) - 2.2% - Skate park - 1.1% 19. If you frequently go outside of Temecula to hang-out, where do you go? Answers receirring at least I.0% of total responses: - Central San Diego - 19.?0~0 - ~Iurrieta - 1?.6°,% - I don't go outside of Temecula to hang-out - 15.1% - North San Diego County - 13.9% - Don't know - 5.1% - Orange County- 4.4% - Los Angeles - 4.4% - Central Riverside County - 4.1% - Oceanside - 2.6% - The beach - 2.1 - ~Xlildomar - 1.6% - Lake Elsinore - 1.0% 20. ~~'hich activities are you involved in today? Ansjvers recervirlg at least 1. d % of total responses: - ti'lusic (listening, downloading) - 3.2% - ~X~'atching movies {theatre) - 3.1% - tX~atching TV/Video - 3.0% - Partying - 2.?% - Computers/electronics (blogging, IM'ing, MySpace, chatrooms) - 2.?% - Socialize/hang-out/visit with friends - 2.6% - Shopping - 2.6% - Swimming (outdoors) - 2.1% - Family activities - 2.0% - Bowling - 2.0% - Coffee house/shop (hanging out) - 1.9% - Reading for pleasure - 1.9°% - Concerts (attend) - 1.9% - Exercising% aerobics - 1.8% - Photography - 1.8% - Arts and Crafts - 1.?0~0 - Dancing (clubs, social) - 1.?% - Billiards%pool - 1.?% - Jogg-ing running - 1.6% Prepared by MIG, Inc. Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Musical Instrument (playing) - 1.6% - ~Xlalking for pleasure - 1.6% - Dog walking - 1.6% - Basketball - 1.5% - Soccer - 1.5°,% - Camping (general) - 1.5% - Football - 1.4% - Volunteering - 1.4% - Bicycling for fim - 1.4% - Snowboarding - 1.4% - Fairs and festivals - 1.4% - Nlusic (producing, writing) - 1.4% - Dancing (ballet, tap, etc.) - 1.4% - Skateboarding - 1.3% - Bicycling (to get around and to school) - 1.3% - Movie/film making -1.3% - Ice skating (indoor) - 1.3% - Education {beyond school) - 1.2% - Fishing (freshwater) - 1.2% - Library (visiting with friends) - 1.2% - Tennis - 1.2% - Auto repair - 1.2% - Bicycling (B1~~Y) - 1.2% - Hiking/backpacking - 1.2% - Rock climbing - 1.1% - Baseball (youth) - 1.1% - Gourmet cooking- 1.1°io - Volleyball (indoor) - 1.1% - Golf (p1aSF} - 1.1% - Volleyball (outdoor/sand) - 1.0% - Swimming (indoors) - 1.0% - Martial arts - 1.0% - Theatre/Drama/Acting - 1.0% - Cultural events (attend) - 1.0% - Drama (participate) - 1.0% - Canoe/kayak - 1.0% - Picnicking - 1.0°,% - Roller/In-line skating- 1.0% - River rafting - 1.0% - Gymnastics - 1.0% Wlrt11rr1 each activity, the majority ofresPorlses were rr1 the "I-5 timesJmonth "category, except the following, which were in the `21-30 times/month category": - Exercising,!Aerobics - 11~7usic (listening, downloading) - Computers/electronics (blogging, IM'ing, MySpace, chatrooms) - Part~~ing - Shopping Prepared by MIG, Inc. 9 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Socialize/hang-out/visit with friends - ~Xiatching TV/Video - Watching movies (theatre) - Swimming (oL~tdoors} All responses, categorized: - Sports - 37.6% - Cultural - 16.4% - Entertainment - 13.7% - Outdoor - 11.9°% - Partying/Socializing - 7.0% - Educational - 4.4% - Shopping - 2.6°,% - Family - 2.0% - Hangout - 1.9% - Personal development - 1.4% - Other - 1.2% 21. Check the five activities you would most like to do in the future ... Answers receiving at least 1.0°/v of total responses: - Socialize/hang-out/visit with friends - 4.4°~ o - ~Xlatching movies {theatre) - 4.0°,% - Concerts (attend) - 3.8°,/0 - 1Vlusic {listening/downloading) - 3.8% - Dancing {clubs, social) - 3.6°,% - Shopping - 3.0% - Bowling-2.9% - Photob aphy - 2.7% - Ice skating (indoor) - 2.7% - Swimming (outdoors) - 2.6°,% - Dancing (ballet, tap, etc.) - 2.3% - Computers~`electronics (blogging, IM'inG, MySpace, chatrooms) - 2.3% - Sno~vboarding - 2.2% - Basketball - 2.1% - Soccer - 2.0% - Exercising/aerobics - 1.8% - Football - 1.7% - Musical instrument {playing) - 1.7°,~0 - Movie/film making - 1.7% - Coffee house/shop (hanging out) - 1.6% - Rock climbing - 1.6% - Camping (general) - 1.5% - Tennis - 1.5% - ~~lusic (producing, writing) - 1.4% - Theatre/Drama/Acting - 1.4% - Volleyball (indoor) - 1.4% - Billiards/pool - 1.4% - Skateboarding - 1.3% - Arts and crafts - 1.3°,% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 10 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Auto repair - 1.3% - Watching TV j Video - 1.3% - Swimming {indoors) - 1.2% - Volunteering - 1.2% - Fairs and festivals - 1.1% - Gourmet cooking - 1.0% - River rafting - 1.0% - Jogging/running - 1.0% - Martial arts - 1.0% All responses, catebo~orrzed: - Sports - 34.7% - Entertainment - 18.2% - Cultural - 17.2°,% - Partying/`Socializing - 12.9% - Outdoor - 7.0% - Shopping - 3.0% - Educational - 2.1% - Hangout - 1.6% - Personal development - 1.2% - Family - 0.9% - Other - 1.3°,% 22. What are the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for youth and teens? Answers reeeivrng at least 1.0% of total responses: - Night clubs/dance clubs - $.0% - ~~1ore hanb outs - 7.1% - Fewer cops; Less hassling from cops - 6.6°% - More things to do - 6.2% - Sports facilities/programs - 5.6% - Concerts~'concert venues - 5.1% - Shopping {e.g. bigger mall, more stores) - 3.9% - Ice skating rinks - 3.5% - Amusement park - 3.4% - ~Y,Iater park - 3.4% - Lovrer cost free things to do - 2.9% - Bowling alleys - 2.7% - Skate parks - 2.5% - Swimming pools - 2.4% - Improve safety - 2.1% - Organized activities - 2.1% - Teen center - 2.0% - Public transit improvements - 1.8% - Special events (e.g. festivals, carnivals) - 1.8% - Better outreach/advertising ofevents - 1.6% - B1VLK trails - 1.5% - Later curfew/no curfew - 1.5% - More teen-friendly businesses - 1.3% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 11 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Discourage drugs/alcohol - 1.1% - Movie theatres - 1.1% - Improve cleanliness of the city - 1.1% - Improve parks/more parks - 1.0% All responses, eategorrzed: - Sports - 19.2% - Entertainment - 17.6% - Hangout - 9.4% - Cops/Curfew - 9.2% - Things to do - 8.8% - Partying/Socializing - 8.7% - CitST unprovement - 7.2% - Retail - 3.9°~0 - Cultural - 3.2% - Affordable - 2.9% - Improve relationships - 2.0% - Educational - 1.5% - More teen-oriented - 1.3% - Drugs/Alcohol - 1.1% - Outdoor - 1.1% - Job-related - 0.$°,% - Personal development - 0.4% - Other - 1.5% 23. What's the best zvay for local youth to get information about local activities or events? - Friends/word-of--mouth - 21.7% - School announcements - 17.1 - Email/IM/text message - 16.6% - ~X~ebsites/internet- 12.9% - Flyers posted around town - 12.9% - City newspapers - 5.6% - School new spapers - 5.0% - Coffee shops - 4.6% - My Space - 0.8% - 1l~Iai1- 0.2% - Don't know - 2.6% 24. Ho~v old are you? - 11-12 - 5.7% - 13-14 - 27.1% - 15-1Ci - 35.4% - 17-18 - 24.2% - 1$-20 - 7.7% 25. What is your gender? - Female - 5 $.3 - Male - 41.7% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 12 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary 26. What is your home zip code? - 92592 - 41.0% - 92591 - 34.3°,% - 92563 - 7.0°,% - 92596 - 6.4% - 92590 - 2.4% - 92589 - 0.8% - 92593 -1.0% - 92545 - 0.4% - 92410 - 0.2% - 92584 - 0.6% - 92562 -1.8% - 92595 - 1.0% - 92532 - 0.4% - 92536 - 0.4% - 92586 - 0.4% - 92587 - 0.4% - 92028 - 0.2% - 92082 - 0.2% - 92530 - 0.2% - 92564 - 0.2% - 92570 - 0.2% - 92883 - 0.2% - 95958 - 0.2% 27. What school do you attend? - Chaparral - 40.7% - Temecula Valley - 20.6°% - Van Avery Preparatoryy - 9.9°io - Rancho Vista - 9.5°ro - Great Oak - 3.9°,% - Vail Ranch 1~~Iiddle School - 2.9% - Day Middle School - 2.9% - Temecula l~liddle School - 2.1% - Linfield - 1.2°,% - Gardner Middle School - 0.8% - Margarita Middle School - 0.6% - Bella Vista Middle School - 0.4% - Paloma Valley High School - 0.4°,% - San Diego State LJniversity - 0.4°% - Cal State University Humboldt - 0.4% - Cal State University Northridge - 0.4% - Home schooled - 0.2°,fo - Vista Murrieta - 0.2% - Antelope Hills Elementary - 0.2% - Shivela Middle School - 0.2% - Temecula Preparatory - 0.2% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 13 Youth Questionnaire Data Summary - Cal State tJniversit~T San l~larcos - 0.2% - Temescal Canyon High School - 0.2% - Elsinore High School - 0.2% - ~Iurrieta Valley High Schaal - 0.2% - Santa Ana High School - 0.2% - Miami of Ohio - 0.2% - Point Loma Nazarene University - 0.2% - S~Teettvater High School - 0.2% - Sierra Madre Academy - 0.2% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 14 adult questionnaire City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 CITY OF TEMECULA YOUTH MASTER PLAN adult questtonna~re Thv City at Temecula is cwtwltly walking on a Youth Mastvl Plan h, addlvss the constantly changing hwlds, c hallvnges and needs facing our youth and teens. We want to know what you think! \'\'hat are the greatest issues and challenges fat ing uw youth! What can the City and othel organizations do better to serve our youth? What types of services, prc>grams and facilities do our youth need! Whether ar not you are a parent of a Tvmvc ula youth or teen-YOUR OPINION IS IMPORTANT! Please till Dirt this yuestionnaile mmpletvly. Your input will by ANONYMOUS- you do not need to give us you name. Your ideas will help us to c reate butter places, outstanding Glcilities, and genitive programs and activities just for youth and teem! Thanks for agreeing to participate. 1. Hmv important to Temer-ula's quality of life are services, pnrgrams and far ilities that serve Irx'al youth and teens? _ Inll.-~o.~nl 3 _ 17on'l 6noty >`:curral a _ ~\nl \'iTy IIn IxIn:111I 5._ Vot Imlxnr.un .n all 2. Do you believe that services, prc gams and fat ilitirs that serve Iota) youth and teens provide benefits to the entire community? 7. r _ A,•n Atudl _ tiiima~cYwl S _ I hen 1 kno~e '~~ivtr al 4 Ven Idtlr i '•:at .ir all 3. How many fun and interesting activities and plates 8. (general inleresi, sports, recreation, volunteer and job opportunities, etc.) are available kr youth and terns in Temecula? I AI~,I _ _ lu.l r n~ Hugh 3. (knl't know ~ ~~uvtral J _ Very l rllle 5._ `:otlung at all 1. What are the top two issue, facing youth and teens in Temecula? i hr•,F, u{, tl~ nt u. _ Bulhing ul t lolrnce rrom olhrr wulh and IFrn. 3. Ihugs 4 i;angs 5 _ Geuing good grade i academic >uccec> 4. lark of friend? 7 _ I atk of momma 8 _ Lad of lol>; 9 _ ~:o uansportauon 10. ~:olhuig to do m then free lone I1 _ PcKa pn+>urn ur pn~surP to hI m 1? _ Planning lur ht•• ailr•r high x'hool 13. Problems with p.uenR 14. Problems at =chcul 1 i _ Olfici 14 Uon'1 knota b. How do youth mtd teens usually get around Temecula? r Pa.r• 1 _ F'arrnL. gu.uJl.ln, dri~~e• Ihr•m J _ hide r~ Ith odler youth and Ieen~ 5 _ 56ateband. rolh_rblade, cooler 4 _ (akc• Illt~ l~ 7 _ Wolf. t3 _ Other ~ DwY know Temec ula is a wfe place for youth and teens. r tin~rt~;;l~ ~Agre~ 1 _ Don'I kuaty r ~.eurrdl a _ Uiwgree 5_Strongly Ucagree q. If you rated any of the park, and facilities above as fair or prxrr for serving youth and teens, please tell us why you did so. i hr•, i. <vu•. 1 F«.d uosad• _-_ '~, rx arv,lre of pads and laalitiec s _ ~•:a cvx,ugh umc -0. ~:nl erxmgh thing; to dq 5 _ Poorh~ maintained G _ Trx1 crowded 7 Trx1 far away, not cawenlc•ruh• lasted 5. What age groups have the highest nerd for programs, services and far ilitirs? 1 r.Iil -_ 111_ 3. 13-1J ~_ li-Ib s._ v-ta 4. I o-!o 7. NI ~a the above 8 . ,.ni+, ..I tho abrnz 9 I K~ail f.nm~ B _ Ulher 9 Uon'I wMo7ued Prepared by MIG: Inc. Al City of Temecula Youth Master Plan Community Workshop #1 Summary Report-May 17, 2007 tll. Whi(h two of the following RECREATION AND ACi1VlTy' FACILITIES are mrnt needed by youth and teen, in Tenwcula? (Check up to two.) t _ Arras for .tx•r l.d ryr•nt> and tr~u+,il- _ ~t• u• g, thraue, dance, mu>rc, lashwn, vr~ual, cultural) 3 _ [i\I\ Uacl. 1. (nlertainmenl (aalmr: t _ (3o+vlmg alley _ Coficc >hops 3 Dancr'mgtn clubs i _ 54ahng nnL 5 _ \trn n~ lheaut~ G._ Olhcy. 5. ~\lulti-purpose bads Nvall.ing, hiLutg, hiAmgl 6._.\tultFUSe rcK reatron cenu•r Igvuq sacral areas, adivrtV rcxnns, etc 1 7 n:.rtural areas 8. n;elghbodtoocl par/.; 4. Pmntlxdl to._ Tmn conk r, or a place just (or teens to hangout tt _ SL.ate pvf. 1 Z _ C>Ihen I t._ i•:o nr~+v ra're.rUr n~ and actn ih fanhtirr. are mK'<lrsl 1.1 Ibn'1 {-rww T t. Which two of the following SPORTS FACILITIES are mrnl needed by youth and teens in Temecula? (.Irr~ f, u/, G., ht n. 1 _ L'as~.rh;dl, >otlball nr•I;h r6amrxrds _ I n,bee or dix gol((ourse 3. G+nmasmms 1. Outckror 6askMl>.tll courts 5. Swimming pools G._ )cone court 7. curl hrlds horror, lacrosse, laotball, tlr ) 8. Chhers 9 _ Mo nrHV -port. tarddies arc needed 10 Don't Mow 1'l. Which two of the following PROGRAMS OR SERVICES are mrr_t needed by youth and teens in Temecula? +!_hcrl. u/~ 0.~ r~rn. 1 _ 'v)uihr pn: Freon l nnnnun;;. sr ufhr rlrcn pi. water htrrc+c. tic.) _ ConvnuniM1 mice IanluutetY oplwrtundusl 3._ [hotrin arti+i0(~-mxrcompMiu+e IR+mntiium, game room, mmputea. etc 1 1. kluortion.rl. Ix~wmd schod rr'rlwntmenl (study shills. SAT pmp, rtr 1 5. l rnuonmental programs Urahue programs, clot 6._ Lscurs inns; tops )amusement paths, mountains, beach, tic 1 7._ C nucntr• sport Irrx~h clnuburg, I>aehpading, snowboardmg, etc) 8. Help wdh Ixrrsonal problems L<up{wrb peer, or talhmgth~cusslon groups) 9._ lolxu-0ated aru+ities Urauung, volunteer, internsMp, or em plotmm~l opponuNticsl t2_ Slx<~al r~pent• Irlanc,~, roncerL in the park, festixals, etc. 11 Others t _'._ b:o nrnV programs are ncrrfcd 13. Lbn't know 1:3. Which two of the following ARTS AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS .4ND SERVICES are mast needed by youth and teens in Temecula? (-heel, ufr ro h+o. t Ua nrr• llrania~;riling Ih<'aUe Y fslnon a Fdm pralucuon S. Musk production G_\tturc pedomtance 7. PamUrryt S. Photograph, 9. Sculptmr 1Q _\'rsual 11 Other t 2 '•~onc of the abrn•e 13 I bn't hnrnv t.t.\1'hat is the best Irxatinn to provide ycwth and teen program.? ChrcF, nor'., 7 .~iuuwnrtV Cenk•i I ,uth-bard le.g, r burr h, <V nagogue, nroatuc, .•U 1 3. Soh«.I 1. Relad or commernal area S _ I mn Cr•ntcr G Others: 7. Ckm'I Lnow 15. What would you expert to be the primary sour(-e of funding for new sen~ices, programs and~ur funding for youth and teens? r h~•r l curs 1 _Puhli, >oure+~ I~o+erument cd+ noel.. la+ inrnras, as>•s?nent. etc) 2 1'i i+ale sowccs 6.c, encouraging pmale rnmptnies to provnte senicc .Program: and servicts based on madd dernan(Isl 3. Puhlic'pnvate paruterships •1 combmahon of all of the aboVc 6 None of the abrne 7 (hher B Don~l 6now 76. What are the Inp Three thing: that the City of Tenterula should du W make the City a better place for youth? 3. 17. What is your age? t tts•2a 2._ 2529 3. 31L3i 1 3st9 5. 1611 6 15-14 7. 5[151 (t iS59 4 6(1(x1 1n 6570 I1 7rY71 12 75- 78. What is your gender? t _tr~m.Jr \talc 19. What in your hnmv xip code? t or,u'r _ _ ' :•',u } 9_':q1 1._92542 5 _92.593 G._(7ther. 20. Are you currently a parent ' guardian or grandparent of a Teme(ula youth or teen ages 1418? I . ,, I,.u,~in FwuJinu d`b ~e>r, rmnnuo u, •11 r _1 es, a);ia~elparenl 11'leasr• ranluwe to ~d l 1 3 _;vo 11'lease >hip to end.) 27. What school does your child attend? If you are the parent !guardian 'grandparent of two ur more youth or teens, please answer for the oldrsi t Chapan al J._l udiedd 1. Rancho Saute Rota S. Rancho VrsU 6. Tcvnecula Pmpiraton 7. Imtrruld Valley B _,\ local noddle school 9 •1 schod ouuide of Temecula Thank you for participating! Prepared by MIG: Inc. A2 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary Questionnaire Response Data - ADULT QUESTIQNNAIRE 1. How important to Ternecula's quality of life are services, programs and facilities that serve local youth and teens? - Verjr important 79.2% - Important - 16.6% - Don't know=/`neutral - 3.6% - Not very important - 0.6% - Not important at all - 0.0°,% 2. Da you believe that sen~iees, programs and facilities that serve local youth and teens provide benefits to the entire community? - Very much - 80.7% - Somewhat - 14.6°,/0 - Don't know/neutral - 1.8% - Very little - 1.8% - Not at all - 1.2% 3. Ho~v many fain and interesting activities and places are available to youth and teens in Temecula? - Verv little - 47.6% - Don't kno~r,~neutral - 25.3% - Just enough - 14.5% - A lot - 12.0% - Nothing at all - 0.6°,% 4. Vl~hat are the top two issues facing youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receiving at least 1.0% of total responses: - Nothing to do in their free time - 20.$°,% - Drugs - 15.3% - Alcohol - 13.2% - Peer pressure, or pressure to ft in - 10.4% - Bullying or violence from other youth and teens - 7.7% - No transportation; can't get around easily - 7.4% - Getting good grades - 4.6% - Gangs - 4.4% - Planning for life after high school - 4.3% - Problems at school - 2.5°,% - Lack of jobs - 1.8% - Problems with parents - 1.7% - Lack of money - 1.5% - Don't know - 1.4% - Lack of friends - 1.1% 5. ~'"hat age group has the highest need for programs, services, and facilities? Prepared by MIG, Inc. 1 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - 9-10 - 2.2% - 11-12 - 3.4% - 13-14 - 16.5% - 15-16 - 24.5% - 17-18 - 9.0% - 19-20 - 2.2% - All of the above - 38.5% - None of the above - 0.3% - Don't know - 3.4°,% 6. How do youth and teens usually get around in Temecula? - Parents,!guardians drive them - 62.3% - Ride with other youth and teens - 9.0% - Don't know - 9.0% - Skateboard, rollerblade, scooter - 5.3% - Bike - 4.4°,% - Drive themselves - 4.0% - ~X~'alk - 3.4% - All of the above - 2.2% - Take the bus - 0. ~°,% 7. Temecula is a safe place for youth and teens (agree/disagree). - Agree - 58.6% - Don't know/in between - 23.4% - Strongly agree - 9.0% - Disagree - 7.$% - Strongly disagree - 1.2% 8. Hato would you rate the adequacy of each of the following parks and community facilities for serving youth and teens? The most common response for each faeilrty. - Neighborhood park in your area -Excellent - Sports Park -Excellent - Temecula Skate Park -Good - Community Recreation Center -Don't know - Temecula Community Center -Good - Svrimming pools -Don't know - Multi-purpose trails -Don't know - Concert venue -Good 4. If you rated any of the above parks and facilities as fair or poor for serving youth and teens, please tell us why you did sa. - Not well taken care of - 34.2% - Don't know - 15.8°/0 - Not enough things to do - 14.7% - Too far away, not conveniently located - 7.9% - Not aware of parks and facilities - 7.9% - Not enough time - 4.7% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 2 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - Too crowded - 4.2°,% - Feel unsafe - 1.6% - No concert venue - 1.6% - Not enough of them - 1.6% - Vulgar language - 1.1% - Smoking- 1.1% - Lack of good skate park - 1.1% - Need more bike trails - 0.5% - Lack of teen programming - 0.5% - Lack of good restrooms - 0.5% - No bilingualism - 0.5% - Too much harassment from cops - 0.5% 10. Which two recreation and aeti~~ity facilities are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receiving at least 1.0% of total responses: - BovTling alley - 12.0% - Skating rink - 11.6% - Teen center, or a place for just for teens to hangout - 11.1% - Dance/night clubs - 10.4% - Entertainment facilities - 9.7% - Arts center/facility - 6.5% - 1Vlulti-use recreation center - 6.4% - Areas for special events and festivals - 6.1% - Paintball - 4.4% - BNLY track - 3.5% - ~~lulti-purpose trails - 3.5% - Neighborhood parks - 2.3% - Swimming pool - 2.3% - Skate park - 1.8% - Nat~.iral areas - 1.4% - No ne~v recreation and activity facilities are needed - 1.4% - Don't know - 1.4% - Coffee shops - 1.2% All responses, cate~~orized: - Sports - 43.2% - Cultural - 12.6% - Hangout - 12.5% - Entertainment - 11.1% - Partying,~Socializing - 10.4% - Outdoor - 7.2°% - Other - 3.0% 11. ~~'hich t«ro of the folly«Ting sports facilities are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? Answers receirrin~o at least 1. d% of total responses: - Swimming pools - 25.5% - Gymnasiums - 12.6°,% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 3 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - Turf fields - 11.1% - Outdoor basketball courts - 10.5% - Don't know - 8.6% - Baseball, softball fields/diamonds - 7.3% - No new sports facilities are needed - 6.9% - Tennis courts - 6.5% - Frisbee or disc golf course - 5.9% - Ice skating rink - 2.1°,% 12. Which two of the following programs or services are mast needed by youth and teens in Teineeula? - Job-related activities - 15.2% - Drop-in activities - 15.1% - Aquatic programs - 11.6% - Special events - 11.5% - Help with personal problems - 9.0% - Educational, beyond school requirements - 8.8% - Extreme sports - 7.7% - Community service - 7.0% - Excursions/trips - 5.7% - Environmental programs - 4.1% - Don't know - 2.7% - No new programs are needed - 0.9% - Computer classes - 0.4% - Arts programs - 0.2°% - Things to do at night - 0.2% 13. ~~'hich two of the follatving arts and cultural programs and services are most needed by youth and teens in Temecula? - Computergraphics - 12.6% - 1l~Iusic performance - 12.2°,/0 - Drama/acting%theatre - 11.8% - Dance - 10.0% - Don't know - 10.0% - Film production - 8.8% - Photography - 8.2% - It~lusic production - 7.4% - Writing {creative or poetry) - 4.4% - Reading - 4.2% - Painting - 3.0% - Visual - 2.4% - Fashion - 2.2% - Sculpture - 1.6% - None of the above - 1.0°,% 14. What is the best location to provide youth and teen programs? - Community c -enter - 32.0% - Teen center 28.3% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 4 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - Faith-based - 12.5°,% - School - 12.5% - Retail/shopping area - 7.0% - Don't know - 6.3% - Homes - 0.7% - Yl~1CA - 0.4% - Library - 0.4% 15. ~~'hat would 3rou expect to be the primary source of funding for new activities, services, or programs for youth and teens? - Public/private partnerships - 14.0% - Public sources - 8.5°% - User fees - 8.1% - Private sources - 7.0% - Don't know - 4.1% - No new funding is necessary - 1.1% - Volunteers 0.4°io - A combination of all of the above - 56.8% 16. What would you expect to be the primary funding source of funding for new facilities or places for youth and teens? - Public/private partnerships - 15.3% - Public sources - 13.2% - Private sources - 9.1% - User fees - 5.4% - Don't know - 2.5% - No new funding is necessary - 0.4% - A combination of all of the above - 54.1% 17. What are the top three things that the City of Temecula should do to make the City a better place for youth? Answers receiving at least 1.0% of total resporsses: - Swimming pool - 6.7% - Safe hang-outs - 6.5% - Provide more activities/things to do - 6.2% - Teen center - 5.8% - More cops - 3.5°,% - Music venues - 3.3% - Bowling alley - 2.7% - Public transit improvements - 2.5% - Arts center - 2.5°/0 - Lover cost/Affordability - 2.5% - Ice skating rink - 2.4% - Jab opportunities - 2.4% - tklater park - 2.2% - Cultural activities - 2.2% - Nighttime activities - 2.2% - Counseling services - 2.2% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 5 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - After-school activities - 2.2% - Job training - 2.0% - Volunteer opportunities - 1.8% - Safety - 1.8°,% - No tolerance for gangs - 1.8% - Less harrassment from cops - 1.6% - Night clubs - 1.6% - Better communication about activities/events - 1.6% - Get input from teens on what they `want - 1.6% - Youth Committee/youth influence in local government - 1.5% - Festivals/`special events - 1.5% - Parenting training,!courses - 1.5% - Academic assistance (e.g. tutoring, homeurork help, college counseling) - 1.3 - Prevention of drug and alcohol use - 1.3% - Parks/open space/trails - 1.3% - Skate parks - 1.3°/0 - Rollerrink - 1.3% - llilentor program - 1.1% - Higher education opportunities/college campus - 1.1% All responses, categorized: - Sports - 13.5% - Hangout - 12.4% - Things to do - 12.2% - Cit~T unprovement - 11.5% - Entertainment - 9.8% - Cops/Curfew - 8.5% - Cult~.ue - 6.2% - Job-related - 5.5% - Educational - 5.3% - Personal development - 4.4% - Affordable - 2.5% - Partying/Socializing- 1.6% - Family - 1.5% - Improve relationships - 1.5% - Drugs/Alcohol - 1.3% - Outdoor - 1.3% - Retail - 0.7% - Other - 0.5% 18. Vl~'hat is jour age? - 18-24 - 10.7% - 25-29 - 7.4% - 30-34 - 10.7% - 35-39 - 20.7% - 40-44 - 18.8% - 45-49 - 18.1% - 50-54 - 7.0% Prepared by MIG, Inc. 6 Adult Questionnaire Qata Summary - 55-59 - 3.7% - 60-64 - 1.8% - 65-70 -0.7% - 75+ - 0.4% 19. What is your gender? - Female - 77.8% - 1\~Zale - 22.2% 20. What is yaur home zip code? - 92592 - 53.0% - 92591 -29.1% - 92596 - 6.0% - 92563 - 3.4% - 92590 - 3.0% - 92562 -1.9% - 92593 - 0.7% - 92532 - 0.7% - 92589 - 0.4% - 92545 - 0.4% - 92028 - 0.4% - 92586 - 0.4% - 92S8S - 0.4% - 92595 - 0.4% 21. Are you currently aparent/guardian or grandparent of a Temecula youth or teen ages 10-1$? - Yes, a parent,!guardian - 66.9% - No - 32.0°,% - Yes, a ~ andparent - 1.1 Prepared by MIG, Inc. 7 TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NC). 23 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail Zigler, Administrative Assistant The Temecula Youth Master Plan is complete. Staff and the consultant, MIG, will be presenting the final draft to the Board of Directors tonight. The master plan for the Temecula Community Center expansion is complete, staff anticipates grading to begin by the end of March. Construction documents are near completion. The expansion will add an additional 3500 square feet of office space to the Temecula Community Center and will be used by S.A. F. E. to provide Human Service Programs. The Redhawk Parks Improvement project is currently in the design development stage. The project architect, RJM Design Group, is currently preparing the plans and specifications for Phase I of the improvement project. The Phase 1 project includes improvements to Redhawk Community Park and Redhawk Dog Park. This project will include a restroom facility, ADA improvements, turf and irrigation modifications, playground upgrades, picnic benches, shade structures, half-basketball courts, and a permanent dog park which includes water fountains, picnic tables, ornate fencing, landscaping and concrete walkways. The Cultural Arts Division hosted a Big Band Ballroom Dance Extravaganza on Saturday, February 2nd This was the first time we held this type of event. Tickets were on sale for $15. A swing band and professional swing dancers provided entertainment to approximately 170 participants, with visitors from Hemet and Riverside. The program was a wonderful success and plans are underway to continue this program. A majority of our recreation programs advertised in the 2008 Winter/Spring Guide to Leisure Activities are currently underway. The brochure features over 250 different classes, several special events and information on all of our recreation and community facilities. The brochure has been well received and many of our classes and activities are sold out. On February 29, 2008 the TCSD staff will be attending the Annual California Parks and Recreation Society Annual Conference to receive four (4) state awards. We will be the recipient of a First Place Award of Excellence for the design of the Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, the design of the Temecula Public Library, the Marketing Campaign forthe Old Town Temecula Community Theater and for the Theater's seasonal brochure "Temecula Presents". The Cultural Arts Division continues to program and carry-out the classes and activities as outlined in the 2008 Winter/Spring Guide to Leisure Activities, and the Old Town Temecula Community Theater's musical and theatrical performance line-up. In addition to classes and activities, there are many special events including theater performances, excursions, etc. The Cultural Arts Division is responsible far the day-to-day operations of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, the Temecula Valley History Museum and the Imagination Workshop, Temecula Children's Museum. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling, cable television services and assessment administration. The TCSD Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of all City parks and facilities, and assist in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division is currently carrying out the classes and activities as outlined in the 2008 Winter/Spring Guide to Leisure Activities. In addition, staff is planning and programming the upcoming spring activities to include the Annual Volunteer Recognition and the Spring Egg Hunt. The Spring Egg Hunt will be held on Saturday, March 22 at Ronald Reagan Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Harveston Community Park and Temeku Hills Park. These egg hunts have been well attended events forthe past several years. Hunts are designed for ages toddlerto 12 years old and areas are held in designated areas at the listed park sites. These events attract approximately 600 participants at each location. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM NC). ~4 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 12, 2008 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:57 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Washington, Roberts ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 25 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Approve the minutes of January 22, 2008. 26 Canveyance of Redevelopment Agency Owned Property to the City of Temecula RECOMMENDATION 26.1 Authorize staff to convey three Agency owned properties in Old Town to the City of Temecula: APN's 922-034-029, 030, and 031, located along the north side of Main Street, west of Mercedes Street, and APN 922-042-004 and 005 located at the SEC of 3rd Street and Mercedes Street; 26.2 Authorize the Executive Director to execute the grant deed on behalf of the Agency and take all other necessary action relating to the conveyance of the property. MOTION: Agency Member Washington moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Agency Member Edwards seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT No reports at this time. R:\Minutes1021208 RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS No reports at this time. RDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:58 p.m., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 26, 2008, at 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California Ron Roberts, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes1021208 ITEM NC). ~5 Approvals ~Q City Attorney s~~~ Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Approval of the 2007-08 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Jason Simpson, Assistant Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET BACKGROUND: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Agency maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, Agency and City staff has reviewed the operating budget and has identified any material adjustments required. The mid-year budget review includes the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects/Redevelopment Fund, and the Debt Service Fund. Activity in each fund is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Summary of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances through December 31, 2007: Presents a summary of prior year and FY 2007-08 year-to-date actual activity, as well as the FY 2007-08 current and revised budget amounts. Also included is a schedule of beginning and estimated ending fund balances based upon the revised budget activity. Revenue Detail: Presents detail of prior year and FY 2007-08 year-to-date revenues through December 31, 2007, as well as the FY 2007-08 current and revised revenue estimates. RevenueslExpenditures The RDA revenues are being modified to reflect values in line with projections based upon the latest report from Riverside County. Gross Tax increment revenue will increase by $2,552,541 to $17,588,077 for FY 2007-08, of which 20%, $510,508, will be allocated to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, as required by State Law. The remaining $2,042,033 will be recorded in the Debt Service Fund. Although tax increment revenue increased, these revised projections were utilized as the basis when issuing the 2007 Tax Allocation Bonds in October 2007. However, these increases are significantly offset by the increase in pass-throughs. The projected Redevelopment Agency expenditures reflect a net increase of $1,629,717 for pass-through payments bringing total pass-through payments to $9,880,951. Finally, staff has adjusted the $600,000 operating transfer out fram the Debt Service Fund and the related operating transfer in to the Capital Projects/Redevelopment Fund to zero {$0) because it is not required. Authorized Positions: No changes are proposed to the Schedule of Authorized Positions. FISCAL IMPACT: The total proposed mid-year adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules and will result in a $1,012,316 increase in available resources in the Debt Service Fund; a net increase of $510,508 in the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund; and a $600,000 decrease in the Capital ProjectslRedevelopment Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. RDA 08- 2007-08 Temecula Redevelopment Agency Mid-Year Budget RESOLUTION NO. RDA 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the RDA maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Section 2. Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA} operating budget. Section 3. That the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the scheduled attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2007-08 RDA operating budget is amended in accordance with the attached schedules. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Ron Roberts,Chairpersan ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Janes, MMC, City ClerklBoard Secretary of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: Susan W. Janes, MMC City Clerk/Board Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS FY2007~-08 M[o-Y~aR BuD~ET TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID-YEAR BUDGET ALL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS ~ t.OMBINED 2006-07 2007-OS 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-l3o-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Total Revenues by Fund: Low/Nbderate Income Housing 6,610,935 3,458,540 2,042,556 3,969,348 510,508 15% Redeveloprent 20,903,231 9,808,318 10,074,227 9,808,318 - 0% Debt Service 13,489,336 18,115,371 13,102,544 20,157,404 2,042,033 11% Total Revenues 41A03,501 31,382,529 25,219,327 33,935A70 2,552,541 26% Total Non-C [P Expenditures by Fund: Low/Nbderate Income Housing 4,040,4S9 9,S10,483 4,610,62S 9,810,433 - 0% Redevelopment 913,S65 325,265 302,569 825,265 - 0% Debt Service 11,605,961 12,096x853 7,544,956 13,726,570 1,629,717 13% Total Expenditures 16,560,315 22,732,601 12,455,153 24,362,318 1629,717 7% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 24,443,186 8,649,928 12,761,174 9,572,752 922,824 Other Financing Sources: Transfers In 2,600,000 600,000 6,348 - (600000) Transfers Out (2,747,993} (21,310,340) (1,112,619} (20,710,340} 600A00 Excess of Revenues and Other Financing Sources Over (Under) Expenditures 24,295,194 (12,060,412) 11,654,903 (11,137,588) 922,824 Fund Balances, Beg. of Year 16,134,665 40,429,859 40,429x$59 40,429x859 Fund Balances, End of Year 40,429,859 2S,369,-147 52,084,762 29,292,271 TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID-YEAR BUDGET LOWIMODERATE HOUSING FUND 2006-OJ 2007-08 2007-OS 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Tofal Revenues 6,610,935 3,458,840 2,042,556 3,969,348 510,508 15% Total Expenditures 4,040,489 9,810.483 4b10b28 9x810,483 - 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,570,446 (6,351,643) (2,568,072) (5841,134) 510,508 15% Operating Transfers Out - - - - - 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 2,570,446 (6,351,643) (2,568,072) (5,841,134) 510,508 Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 13,920,799 16,491,245 16,491,245 16,491,245 Fund Balance, End of Year 16,491,245 10,139,603 13,923,173 10,650,111 3 TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID-YEAR BUDGET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Achrals Budget Achrals Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Tonal Revenues 18,303,231 9,808,318 10,067,879 9,808,318 - 0% Total Expenditures 765,872 825,265 302,569 S25,265 - 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expendihrres 17,537,359 8,983~(l53 9,765,310 8,983,053 - 0% Operating Transfers In 2,600,000 600,000 6,348 - (600,000) -100°io Operating Transfers Out (147,993) (20,710,340) (1,106,271) (20,710,340) - 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out 19,989,366 (11,127,287) 8,665,388 (11,727,287) 600,000 Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 776,581 20,765,947 20,765,947 20,765,947 Fund Balance, End of Year 20,765,947 9,63S,660 29,431,334 9,03S,660 4 TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY OP REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BAL.ANGES FY2007-2008 -MID-YEAR BUDGET DEBT SERVICE FUND 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 Proposed Audited Current Year-to-Date Revised Increase Increase Actuals Budget Actuals Budget (Decrease) Necrease) Total Revenues 13,489,336 18,115,371 13,102,544 20,15J,404 2,042,033 11% Total Expenditures 11,605,961 12096,553 7,544,956 13,726,570 1,629,717 13% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,883,375 6(118,518 5,557,58S 6,430,834 412,316 -2% Operating Transfers Out (2~600A00) (600A00) (6,348) - 600,000 0% Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Out (716,625) 5,418,518 5,551,240 6,430,834 1A12,316 Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 1,437,285 720,660 720,660 720,660 Fund Balance, End of Year 720,660 6,139,178 6,271,S99 7,151,493 5 TEMEGULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE DETAIL FY2007-2008 -MID-YEAR BUDGET' ALL RDA FUNDS--REVENUE DETAIL PCCT FY ~-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHPNGE % Q,RRENT REVISED IN NO 165 LOW CD HCI~ING FUND POTUALS YTD @ 12 31 7 ESTI(v1ATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHPNGE 4015 -Tax Increment 3,126,735 1,761,745 3,007,107 3,517,615 510,508 16.98% 4051 -Donations 2,025 - - - - 4060 -Miscellaneous 10,331 - - - - 4065+4545 -[nvestmentlnterest 397,899 173,796 280,733 2,733 - 4066 -Loan Interest 9,338 2,638 - - - 4075 -Rentallncome 126,000 - 126,000 126,000 - 4076 -Reimbursements 2,854,901 81,250 - - - 4077 -For ivable Loan Re a meat 83 706 23 127 45 000 45 000 - TOTPL LOW CO HOUSING FUND 6 610 935 2042 556 3 458 840 3 969 348 510 508 14.76% PCCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHPNGE °~6 O..RRENT REVISED IN NO 280 REDEVELOPMENT FUVD ACTUALS YTD @ 12 31 07 ESTIMATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CH1~1GE 4051 -Donations 2, 500 - - - - 4060 -Miscellaneous Non Taxable 1,902 - - - - 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 613,049 314,035 20,000 20,000 - 4066 -Loan Interest 11,515 5,557 13,000 13,000 - 4075 -RentalIncorne 2,788 2,117 2,800 2,800 - 4076 -Reimbur~ments 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 - 4090 -C~erating Transfers In 2,600,000 6,348 600,000 - (600,000) -100.00% 4800 -Bond Proceeds 20 251 477 9 752 518 9 752 518 9 752 518 - TOTPL REDEVELCIFMENT FLND 23 503 231 10 080 575 10 408 318 9 8C~ 318 600 000 -5.76% PCCT FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 07-08 FY07-08 CHPNGE S'o CURRENT REVISED IN NO 380 DEBT SERVICE FUVD POTUALS YTD @ 12 1 7 ESTIP~IATES ESTIMATES ESTIMATES CHPNGE 4015 -Tax Increment 12,6,938 7,046,978 12,028,429 14,070,462 2,042,033 16.~°ro 4065+4545 -Investment Interest 88,875 18,084 49,460 49,4FA - 4800 -Bond Proceeds 893 523 6 037 482 6 037 482 6 037 482 - TOTPL DEBT SERVICE FUND 13 489 336 13 102 544 18 115 371 20 157 404 2042 033 11.27 ~~/~ ITEM NC). 26 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: John Meyer, Redevelopment Director DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Letter of Support for Highland Property Development's acquisition of the Oak Tree Apartments RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members authorize the Executive Directorto issue a Letter of Support for Highland Property Development's acquisition of the Oak Tree Apartments for affordable housing purposes. BACKGROUND: Highland Property Development is in the process of acquiring and rehabilitating the Oak Tree Apartments which are located on 42176 Lyndie Lane (APN 921-310- 009). This 40 unit apartment complex currently functions as affordable housing through a US Department of Agriculture Rural Development Loan. These Loans have a pre payment option which the owner requested from the Federal Government. This makes the Oak Tree Apartments "at risk of conversion." However, Highland Property Development has a relationship with the owners and is seeking to acquire and rehabilitate the apartments and maintain them as affordable housing. As part of the acquisition and rehabilitation of the project, Highland is applying for funding through the Multifamily Housing Program (Prop 1-C funds). As part of that application, they need a letter of support from the local jurisdiction. Staff feels this is an excellent way to maintain affordable housing opportunities within the City of Temecula. Highland Properties has successfully acquired 20 rural development apartment complexes totaling over 1,100 units. The units are already considered affordable and preserving their affordability is important as we go through the process of re-certifying our Housing Element. In addition, if they receive the Multifamily Housing Program funding, they will not be seeking any financial assistance from the Agency. They will also be pursuing tax exempt bond financing as well. This will require the Council/Agency Board to conduct a TEFRA hearing in the near future. TEFRA stands for Tax Exempt Fiscal Responsibility Act, Internal Revenue Code of 1986. We conducted a similar hearing for the Senior Housing project on Pujol. FISCAL IMPACT: Neither the Letter of Support nor the TEFRA Hearing commits the CitylAgency to any fiscal obligation or financial liability. Attachment: Letter of Support City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency 43200 Business Park Drive•Temecula, CA 92590•Mailing Address: PO. Box 9033•Temecula, CA 92589-9033 1951) 694-641 Z • Fax 1951) 693-3903 February 27, 2008 Highland Property Development, LLC 250 W. Colorado Blvd., Suite 210 Arcadia, CA 91007 ATTN: William E. Rice, Authorized Manager RE: Application for Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) funds for acquisition and rehabilitation of Oak Tree Apartments, located at 42176 Lyndie Lane in the City of Temecula. Dear IVIr. Rice: 1'he City of Temecula supports Highland Property Development, LLC (HPD) in applying to the California. Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) financing to partially- finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of the Oak Tree Apartments. Oak Trce Apartments are currently: being financed with a U.S. Department of Agriculture -Rural Development (USDA-RD) loan and receives rental assistance from U5DA-RD on 39 of the 40 units (1 manager's unit) to ensure their affordability to low- and very low-income residents of the t;ity. USDA-RD considers the project to be "At-Risk" of converting to mazket rate units in the future. Conversion of this affordable rental project to mazket rate would result in a significant economic hardship for can-ent residents of the 39 affordable units. Additionally, any loss of affordable units in the City wonld have a significant impact on the housing balance in the City and create an additional need for housing affordable income residents. If received, the MHP funds combined with other private and public financing will both rehabilitate Oak Tree Apartments 'and- maintain the affordability of the units for. qualified households living in Temecula. Preservation and rehabilitation of affordable housing meet the goals and policies for the City's General PlairHousing Element and Redevelopment Agency's 5-Year Implementation Plan. ~Ve look forward to working with you in providing affordable. housing for the residents of the City of Temecula.. Sincerely, Shawn D: Nelson . Executive Director ® Pnnttd on RerydeO Paper J RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NC). ~7 Approvals ~Q City Attorney s~~~ Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: John Meyer, Redevelopment Director DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Redevelopment Departmental Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. REDEVELOPMENT Old Town Strategic Plan The Agency has worked with the Planning Department to conduct a series of public workshops that will establish a new vision for Old Town. This effort includes, looking at the scale and massing of the buildings, evaluating the market conditions in Old Town and establishing an appropriate long term parking strategy. Six community workshops were held. The recommendations from the workshops were presented to the Old Town Local Review Board at its February meeting. The Board was supportive of the recommendations with a few minor additions. Town Sauare Market Place As part of the Civic Center Master Plan, the City has created a development opportunity for approximately 52,000 square feet of commercial and office development surrounding the Town Square along the reconfigured Main Street. The Agency has issued a Request for Interest to select a preferred development partner. Six firms have been interviewed and a second round of interviews has been scheduled for March. It is anticipated that an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with a preferred developer will be brought to the City Council in the next 45 - 60 days. Facade Improvement Program The Facade Improvement Program provides funding assistance to Old Town business and property owners to provide exterior improvements to their buildings and property. Funding in the amount of $80,000 is available during FY 2007-08. The following fagade improvements are in process ar recently completed: Palomar Hotel - Paint Exterior, New Windows and Doors La Menagerie - Design and Install Sand Blasted Wood Signs The Bank of Mexican Food - Paint Exterior Door & Window Frames HOUSING Housing Element Update The Agency is assisting with the Planning Department's Housing Element Update. The Housing Element is a chapter of the City General Plan and is required to be updated every 6 years. The Housing Element provides goals and policies for meeting the projected housing needs within the City. Diaz Road Exclusive Negotiation Agreement The Agency issued a Request for Interestto select a preferred development partner for the 30 acre site located on Diaz Road. Seven firms have responded. The Agency is negotiating an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement {ENA) with a preferred developer. Habitat for Humani The first Habitat Way Volunteer Workday was held on Saturday, January 12 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Pujol & First Streets in Old Town Temecula. The volunteers began framing and raising the walls, and setting trusses and beams on all five houses. The units are now about half completed. Roofing, insulation and drywall are almost ready to begin. There is still ample of opportunity for volunteer assistance. Dalton Mixed -Use III On March 28, 2006, the Council approved an Owner Participation Agreement with D'Alto Partners to build amixed-use affordable housing project. The project will consist of 22 units over4,700 sq. ft. of retaiUcammercial. The project is located an the north side of Fifth Street, west of Mercedes. The residential and commercial units have been occupied. First Time Homebuyers Program Funding in the amount of $100,000 is available for FY 07 -08. Residential Improvement Programs The program budget for FY 07-08 is $230,940.17, with $36,950 funded on 7 units. The amount available to each participant is $7,500. OLD TOWN PROMOTIONSIMARKETING Farmers Market On Navember 6t",the City Council approved the Secand Amendment to the License Agreement with Farmer's Market Management Inc. {The Cunninghams). Since November 10, 2007 staff has conducted seven (7}surveys revealing an average of 34 farmers, 23 retail vendors, 23 food vendors and 7 Old Tawn merchants per week. Staff will continue to monitor the Market each Saturday to collect attendance data. Staff is also working with the Old Town Merchants to ensure that they have an opportunity to participate in the Farmer's Market as well as collaborate with them to create a mare viable retail center far Old Town. Old Tawn Marketing and Promotions In response to the merchant's requestto be more involved in marketing and promotions in Old Town a public meeting was held in which it was determined that a working group of key stakeholders including the Chamber of Commerce, Convention and Visitor's Bureau, The Downtown Association and the Old Town Temecula Business Association be established. The purpose of the working group is to re-evaluate the marketing program for Old Town. This working group will meet bi-weekly. The Group has been evaluating upcoming Western Days and Street Painting Festival events and is considering ways to expand both events. This years Western Days will include a Chili Cook-off. Bluegrass Festival The Eighth Annual Old Town Temecula Bluegrass Festival will be held March 15 & 16, 2008. The weekend will feature bands performing on three stages from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Saturday and 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sunday. This year's lineup includes Bluegrass Etc., Tom Ball& Kenny Sultan, The Marty Warburton Band, Silverado Bluegrass Band, Bluegrass Brethren, Sligo Rags, the Burnett Family Bluegrass, Andy Rau Band, Temeku Bluegrass, Highway 138, Pacific Ocean Bluegrass and This Justin a Windy. Pacific Ocean Bluegrass Band won 1 Sc Place at the prestigious Topanga Banjo/Fiddle Contest {2007} in the band category. Other upcoming events will include Western Days May 17 & 18, the Street Painting Festival June 28 & 29 followed by Hot Summer Nights beginning July 11 through August 29. Old Town Temecula LUEGRASS March t5 & ~6, zoo8 Tom Ball & Kenny Sultan Sat. & Sun. Weekend Dry Camping in Town $~o per night. • ` , RSVP (95~) 678-0831 SPONSORED BY c3 Dlamomi I ~ Rags 8c Sun. i, Silverado Bluegrass Sat. 8c Sun. Burnett Family Bluegrass Sat. 8c Sun. PLUS ANDY RAU BAND, TEMEKU BLUEGRASS, HIGHWAY X38 PACIFIC OCEAN BLUEGRASS THIS JUSTIN & WINDY RIDGE All concerts are free. Plus Plenty of Jam Sessions and Workshops Indoor and Outdoor Stages call (95~) 694-6412 or (95~) 67$-456 visit www.Temeculacalifornia.com Bluegrass Etc. Sat. & Sun. Bluegrass Brethren Sunday PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NC). 28 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA06-0340, a General Plan Land Use Map Amendment to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to correctly designate existing uses, to identify water courses as Open Space areas, minimize "split" land use designations by correcting mapping errors, revise Specific Plan Land Use designations based on recorded map data; and, to amend the Community Design Element's Chaparral Policy Area to remove certain grading constraints which are mitigated under the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan PREPARED BY: Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06- 0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP BY IDENTIFYING THE USES ESTABLISHED IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, TO IDENTIFY WATER COURSES AS OPEN SPACE AREAS, MINIMIZE "SPLIT" LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BY CORRECTING MAPPING ERRORS, AND REVISE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USES BASED ON RECORDED MAP DATA 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06- 0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT CHAPARRAL POLICY AREA TO REMOVE CERTAIN GRADING CONSTRAINTS WHICH ARE MITIGATED UNDER THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BACKGROUND: General Plan Land Use Map - On April 12, 2005, the Temecula City Council adopted a comprehensive update of the Temecula General Plan. At this meeting, the City Council considered 18 proposed land use changes and ultimately authorized two of them. The approved changes included changing the designation from Medium Density residential on nine acres at the southeast east corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way to a combination of Professional Office and Open Space, and; changing the designation from Very Low Density Residential on 18 acres on the west side of Butterfield Stage Road and north of Chemin Clinet to a combination of Low Density and Low Medium Density Residential. No other land use changes were approved. Upon receipt of the final Land Use Map which was prepared by a consultant, it was apparent that many additional land use changes had been made to the Land Use Map. When asked for clarification concerning the reason behind the land use changes, the consultant responded by stating they were directed by staff to make the changes deemed as "clean up." There is no correspondence or other documentation from City staff requesting any changes beyond those authorized by the City Council, nor were property owners or the general public notified concerning these "clean up" changes. Therefore, on the advice of the City Attorney, staff directed the City's GIS Department to prepare a new Land Use Map based on the Land Use Map that existed prior to the 2005 Comprehensive Update to the General Plan; and including the two changes authorized by the City Council on April 12, 2005. It is this Map that is proposed for amendment. The General Plan Land Use Map currently being used by the City and the general public does not accurately represent the built environment. Far example, the current Land Use Map shows watercourses with urban land uses rather than Open Space, and shows many streets with urban land uses rather than having no designation. This becomes problematic when vacant land is inventoried to project the amount of commercial, industrial and residential construction that may occur in the future. Other proposed changes include properly identifying all City Parks and open space areas as Open Space. In many areas the land uses cut through parcels causing "split" designations on multiple parcels and overlapping computer data sets have caused mislabeled land uses and "sliver" parcels. In these occurrences, land uses have been adjusted to the boundaries of parcels. Planning staff found approximately 170 parcels City wide where the land use either did not match the built environment or the parcels had split designations due to overlapping computer data sets. Planning staff worked with the City's GIS department to create 21 exhibits (see Land Use Map Resolution, Exhibit A} which indicate the existing land use designations and the proposed land use changes throughout the City. GIS staff also prepared mailing labels of property owners affected by the proposed changes and they were sent notices of a Proposed Negative Declaration and an exhibit indicating how the proposed change would affect their property. The proposed changes to the Land Use Map will result in a Map that more closely resembles the built environment. Community Design Element -With respect to the Community Design Element, staff proposes a text amendment to the Chaparral PolicyArea requiring coordination with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), deleting the 25 percent slope constraint for grading activity, and deleting a provision which permits grading within identified constraint areas if mitigation is provided. The MSHCP is more comprehensive in its ability to protect sensitive habitat from insensitive grading activity and adherence to the policies in the MSHCP is required for all new projects. The existing policies contained in the Community Design Element that are redundant and no longer needed are recommended far deletion. The Chaparral Area section of the Community Design Element was originally adopted to protect sensitive habitat, slopes, and riparian and riverine areas located throughout this area of the City. However, parcel maps in this area that were recorded prior to the City's incorporation have led to development in the Chaparral Area that is not consistent with the General Plan. Proposed new development in the area is subject to standards that differ from prior approvals. Furthermore, the constraints identified in the Chaparral Area create a hardship for development in the remaining portions of this area. During the 2005 Comprehensive Update of the General Plan, the City Council adopted an interim policy to allow density averaging for remaining acreage in the Chaparral Area as a temporary measure to address this issue. The proposed changes to the Chaparral Area text will relax or eliminate some of the constraints contained in the current General Plan, butwill also require that all new development activity in this area conform to the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Adherence to the MSHCP serves to protect the same goals and objectives that led to the creation of the Chaparral Area policies. Planning Commission -On August 18, 2007, staff presented the proposed Land Use changes and the proposed text amendment to the Community Design Element. No members of the public spoke either for or in opposition to the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission had no comments and approved a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed changes to the Land Use Map and the Community Design Element. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission - Prior to Planning Commission, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) informed staff that some of the proposed Land Use Map changes were within the French ValleyAirport Influence Area and that the ALUC would need to conduct a hearing on the proposed Land Use Map Amendment to make a determination of consistency with the French Valley Airport Land Use Consistency Plan. In November 2007, staff submitted an application for a hearing to the ALUC. On January 10, 2008, the ALUC determined that the proposed Land Use Amendment was consistent with the plan for French Valley Airport. ENVIRONMENTAL: Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 08-_ (Land Use Map Amendment) Resolution 0$-_ (Community Design Element Amendment} Planning Commission Minutes, August 18, 2007 Planning Commission Staff Report, August 18, 2007 Airport Land Use Commission Approval Letter RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOfi-0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP BY IDENTIFYING THE USES ESTABLISHED IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, TO IDENTIFY {HATER COURSES AS OPEN SPACE AREAS, MINIMIZE "SPLIT" LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BY CORRECTING MAPPING ERRORS, AND REVISE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USES BASED ON RECORDED MAP DATA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds and determines that: A. On August 18, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA06-0340. B. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on August 15, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the public comment portion of the Commission hearing, the Planning Commission requested staff revise the proposed Land Use Map exhibits to identify all city-owned parks as Open Space. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA06-0340 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. On January 10, 2008, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission determined that the proposed Land Use Map Amendment is consistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Consistency Plan. G. On February 26, 2008, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this Resolution. H. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council adapted a Negative Declaration for the project and approved the recommended Land Use Map amendments under Planning Application No. PA06-0340 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder and the attached Exhibit A. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the amended General Plan Land Use Map hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community; The proposed amendments to the Land Use Map meet the goals and policies of the General Plan, and are consistent with the anticipated impacts of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan and the guidelines of the Municipal Code. Any future development will be subject to the City's General Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the community is maintained as new development occurs. B. The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses; The proposed amendments to the Land Use Map are representative of.~ the existing built environment, future uses on currently vacant land resulting from approved Planning Applications or approved City projects, a change from urban land uses to Open Space to identify existing water courses, or the removal of land use designations from dedicated streets throughout the City of Temecula. Therefore, the proposed amendments will be compatible with future uses in the surrounding areas proposed for change. C. The amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan; The proposed Land Use Map amendments will not conflict with the existing zoning or land uses throughout the City and will result in a Map that more accurately describes the built environment. Therefore, the proposed amendment will result in compatible future development, which is a goal of the General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommended approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment (the Project}: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"}, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the General Plan Amendment as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"}. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on July 16, 2007, and expired on August 14, 2007. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. Three written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The City Council reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the February 26, 2008 City Council meeting and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1 } the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2} there is na substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3} Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. E. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. The City Council hereby amends the Land Use Map of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to incorporate the changes described and depicted on Exhibits 2a to 2u attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 28, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Bahia Vista Park and Calle Aragon Park GPA Existing Land Use OS ~_ _ PI ,~ Proposed Land Use OS PI Butterfield I Pauba GPA Existing Land Use PI Proposed Land Use PI Butterfield Ranch 1 Redhawk GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Chaparral High School GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use PO H PI C Crowne Hill GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use RR VA PI OS EnfieldlRiverton GPA Existing Land Use VL Proposed Land Use OS L VL Great Oak High School G PA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Loma Linda Park GPA Existing Land Use TTL Proposed Land Use TTL Meadowview GPA Existing Land Use OS Proposed Land Use OS Nicolas Road Park GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use ~\ ~ / ~< ~ ~~ ;~ w w OS _- SC Old Town G PA Exisiting Land Use -- H i H ~,q,;~,r~-~ i ~~,` ,.. ~ ~H Proposed Land Use SC \~~, Fi Promenade GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use r~ N Redhawk/Pechanga GPA Rotary Park GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Serena Hills GPA Existing Land Use ~----~_ Proposed Land Use OS Temeku Hills Park GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Vintage Hills Elementary GPA Existing Land Use NC PI Proposed Land Use NC OS PI Voorburg Park GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use ~------~I€RRAMADR~-DR - - n z c? O OS _- ~rr -- ._ _-t Winchester Creek Park Existing Land Use LM Proposed Land Use OS Wolf Creek North GPA Existing Land Use PI NC Proposed Land Use PI CC Wolf Creek South GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use PI NC TTL M OS RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT CHAPARRAL POLICY AREA TO REMOVE CERTAIN GRADING CONSTRAINTS WHICH ARE MITIGATED UNDER THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds and determines that: A. ~n August 15, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA06-0340. B. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on August 15, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA06-0340 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. On February 26, 2008, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this Resolution. F. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council adopted a Negative Declaration for the project and approved the recommended text amendments to the Community Design Element under Planning Application No. PA06-0340 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder and the attached Exhibit A. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the amended General Plan Community Design Element hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community; The proposed amendments to the Community Design Element meet the goals and policies of the General Plan, and are consistent with the anticipated impacts of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) far the General Plan and the guidelines of the Municipal Code. Any future development will be subject to the City's General Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the community r"s maintained as new development occurs. B. The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses; The proposed amendments to the text of the Community Design Element Chaparral Area Will not affect the current zoning or amount of development activity permitted in this area of the City. Therefore, the proposed amendments will be compatible with future uses in the surrounding areas proposed for change. C. The amendments will not have an adverse effect on the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan; The proposed amendments to the text of the Community Design Element Chaparral Area wilt not conflict with the existing zoning or land uses throughout the City and will result in a Map that more accurately describes the built environment. Therefore, the proposed amendment will result in compatible future development, which is a goal of the General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findinq,s. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommended approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment (the Project}: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"}, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the General Plan Amendment as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"}. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on July 16, 2007, and expired on August 14, 2007. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. Three written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The City Council reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the February 26, 2008 City Council meeting and based on the whale record before it finds that: (1 } the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2} there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3} Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. E. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. The City Council hereby amends the Community Design Element of the General Plan to incorporate the changes to pages 18 and 19 of the Community Design Element as described and depicted on Exhibit A attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADAPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of February, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIQE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA } I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of February, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk ;~. ~ .1~~ ~~ - ~~~ lvi tvl N T L I N • Cuxb cuts to Highway 79 should be minimized. Consider internal circulation roads and common access points as alternatives to providing direct access from each lot. CHAPARRAL f~REA The Chapaxxal Area is characterized by moderately sloped hillsides above dry washbeds. Existing development consists of segmented lot patterns of varying sizes. This area provides an opportunity to transition down from the larger lots found in the Los Ranchitos and ~ , }} f ~ i . ~v «.......~ `-rpi ~ a'v4 .qa Y~ ~Mtt"" ~~~ ~..,,"~ p irrhnia/Yan4 r ~e,.w .a 44 ;y ,, xarnmi3?tiia *~++~~ GiEtr ,"*6 ! Fe ~ p ~ ~ t 4~ ~ ~ ~ {y~tO lY y {/ ~A'3Vxl '~ ~ ~, ~" , CGaparral ~ `*' t ~p Area ,. ~~~ ~'. ~ "+''~~"'nvq+m RFFdW~'~. m ~ ~ .. t dA~ L 4 Sanriago Estates areas to the south and west. Spectal development considerations axe necessary to assure development does not exceed the carrying capacity of the area, while still providing appropriate transition of density. The following development requirements apply within the Chapaxxal Area: • The gross density in the Chaparral Area shall be one dwelling unit per acre, except for the tier of lots adjacent to and approximately seven hundred feet east of Ynez Road, where two dwelling units per acre may be allowed. • In areas with one unit per acre gross density, half-acre (20,000 square feet) lots may be allowed when the remaining property is set aside and preserved fox open space and habitat purposes. All project approvals shall include conditions of approval and requirements to ensure the long term protection and maintenance of these open space and habitat riverine/riparian areas. • In areas with two units per acre gross density, projects shall incorporate and support, to the maximum extent feasible, an internal road network intended to minitnize internal vehicle trips using, and vehicular turning movement conflicts along, Ynez Road. • As part of the design review process, all future developments shall provide trail right-of--way dedications and/or easements fox, as well as construct or agree to fund the future construction of, the approved citywide trail network in and adjacent to a particular development project. • Constraint Areas axe recognized as having the following characteristics: ^ Areas within natural drainage courses. G:\Plamiing\200G\PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design\Planning\Commdesign_Pinal (amended 11-06) draft.doc 18 ,~` • Areas with sensitive biological resources as identified ox referenced in the General Plan, Multi-Species Habitat C Conservation Plan or site specific study. o s 5> - ~ \ ..,.1...7:..5 1,,,~~1._ F.,,1,7..) ~U~77 ,.,.,] 1 C~°L t V l . _Y Y_4 ».p,.,. iasi~~e. 1 • Proposed building pads, driveways and septic-leach field Y locations shall be shown on the tentative map. • A written statement (Form SAN 53) from the Health Officer of D Riverside County Department of Environmental Health shall be E provided stating the type of sewage disposal that will be permitted fox the proposed lots. • All drainage areas will remain natural (no undexgxounding ox placement in v-ditches). Use of energy dissipatoxs, retention basins or desilting basins, will be permitted as deemed necessary N by the Director of Public Works. • Joint access and driveways shall be required to the greatest extent possible to reduce impacts. • Residences should be designed using alternative foundation techniques to maintain the existing topography to the greatest extent possible. Rather than using extensive grading to create flat building areas, stepped and pier and beam foundations shall be encouraged. Retaining walls interior to the structure are encouraged over stem walls along the exterior face of the structure. • No graded slope shall exceed a 2:1 gradient. The maximum vertical height of graded slopes over a 3:1 gradient shall be 10 feet. • Where grading occurs, finished slopes should be contoured with land form grading, rather than a formal engineered look. • Retaining walls shall be discouraged to the greatest extent possible, particularly between a structure and the public view. Crib walls or similar stxucmxes, shall be used in-lieu of retaining shrubs and vines. Where retaining walls axe used and visible <. 1 (~ Y C~ F T [: M 13 L. l( L A C., L ti E It A L P f. A N CD19 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2007 CALL TO ORDER ' The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, August 15, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1 Commission Noise Subcommittee Status Report Chairman Chiniaeff advised that the following issues were discussed by a subcommittee consisting of the public, staff, Council Member Edwards, Mayor Washington, Commissioner Guerriero, and Chairman Chiniaeff: • Misdemeanor Laws • Lot Sizes • Barking Dogs • Complaints by the public • Normal Nuisance Law • Decibel Levels The above-mentioned will be drafted into a report and forwarded to the subcommittee for review to be followed by the Planning Commission public hearing for consideration. R:VvlinutesPC\081507 - 1 2 Discussion of Floor Area Ratio (FART Increase Criteria By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Fisk provided a report, highlighting on the following: • Description • Purpose of FAR Standards • FAR Research Approved FAR Increases o Ahmed Medical Building o Fairfield Marriott o Hampton Inn o Hanks Hardware • Alternative #1 - Do not change the criteria identified in the Development Code • Alternative #2 -Eliminate FAR standards from the General plan and Development Code Alternative #3 -Expand the criteria for allowing an FAR increases beyond General Plan and Development Code targets. The Planning Commission concurred with staffs recommendation to direct staff to prepare an Ordinance amendment based on Alternative #3. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Papp highlighted on the following: • Project Description • Location • Land Use Map Issues • General Plan Land Use Map o Butterfield/Pauba o Butterfield Ranch/Redhawk o Chaparral High School ' o Crowne Hill o Enfield/Riverton o Great Oak Hiah School ----Chairman Chiniaeff recused himself. o Meadowview o Old Town o Promenade o Redhawk/Pechanaa----Chairman Chiniaeff recused himself. o Vintaoe Hills Elementary o Wolf Creek North----Chairman Chiniaeff recused himself. o Wolf Creek South---Chairman Chiniaeff recused himself. o Community Design Element R:1MinutesPCl081507 Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that for Old Town: first parcel, east of Mercedes Street and north of future Civic Center, this should be Public Institutional (PI), not residential. For the Planning Commission, Senior Planner Papp advised that the required proper public notices were implemented. At this time the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed. The Planning Commission thanked Senior Planner Papp for his presentation. MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected aaaroval with the exception of Chairman Chiniaeff abstaining from Great Oak Wish School; Redhawk/Pechanaa; Wolf Creek North; and Wolf Creek South. PC RESOLUTION NO.07-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0340 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP BY IDENTIFYING THE USES ESTABLISHED IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, TO IDENTIFY WATER COURSES AS OPEN SPACE AREAS, MINIMIZE "SPLIT" LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BY CORRECTING MAPPING ERRORS, AND REVISE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USES BASED ON RECORDED MAP DATA, AND; TO AMEND THE COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT CHAPARRAL AREA TO REMOVE CERTAIN GRADING CONSTRAINTS WHICH ARE MITIGATED UNDER THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS A. Referencing the demolition of the 5 and Diner on Ynez Road in progress; Commissioner Carey expressed concern with the safety issues that are exposed to the public. B. .Commissioner Telesio commended Commissioner Harter for his article in the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce referencing exterior painting requirements and signs for multi- tenant developments. C. Commissioner Guerriero thanked Director of Planning Ubnoske for her efforts with regard to Ad Works mobile sign vehicle. D. Chairman Chiniaeff advised that he will not be in attendance of the August 29 and September 5, 2007, Planning Commission meetings. R:VdinutesPC\081507 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Referencing Commissioners attending subcommittee meetings and fees, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that he will explore the issue. Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that in the near future he will be requesting a Commissioner to partake in a subcommittee regarding new signage for the Temecula Auto Dealers. ADJOURNMENT At 7:00 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to August 29, 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. rf Dennis Chiniaeff Chairman ~~ ~~ ~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\087507 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: August 15, 2007 PREPARED BY: Emery J. Papp, AICP TITLE: Senior Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA06-0340, a General Plan Land Use DESCRIPTION: Map Amendment to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to correctly designate existing uses, to identify water courses as Open Space areas, minimize "split" land use designations by correcting mapping errors, revise Specific Plan Land Use designations based on recorded map data; and, to amend the Community Design Element's Chaparral Policy Area to remove certain grading constraints which are mitigated under the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. RECOMMENDATION: ^ Approve with Conditions ^ Deny ^ Continue for Redesign ^ Continue to: ® Recommend Approval ^ Recommend Denial CEQA: ^ Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class} ^ Notice of Determination (Section) ® Negative Declaration ^ Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan ^ EIR C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.ComlDocument Converter~temp1871438.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: City of Temecula General Plan Designation: All Land Use Designations Zoning Designation: All Zoning designations Site/Surrounding Land Use: BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 12, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted a comprehensive update of the Temecula General Plan. During the discussions concerning Land Use, the City Council considered 18 proposed land use changes and ultimately authorized two of these changes including changing the designation from Medium Density residential on nine acres at the southeast east corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way to a combination of Professional Office and Open Space, and; changing the designation from Very Low Density Residential on 18 acres on the west side of Butterfield Stage Road and north of Chemin Clinet to a combination of Low Density and Low Medium Density Residential. No other land use changes were approved. Upon receipt and inspection of the final Land Use Map which was prepared by a consultant, it was apparent that many additional land use changes had been made to the Land Use Map. When asked for clarification concerning the reason behind the land use changes, the consultant responded by stating they were directed by staff to make the changes deemed as "clean up." There is no correspondence or other documentation from City staff requesting any changes beyond those authorized by the City Council, nor were property owners or the general public notified concerning these "clean up" changes. Therefore, on the advice of the City Attorney, staff directed the City's GIS Department to prepare a new Land Use Map showing the land uses prior to the 2005 Comprehensive Update to the General Plan and including the two changes authorized by the City Council on April 12, 2005. It is this Map that is proposed for amendment. With respect to the Community Design Element, staff proposes a text amendment to the Chaparral Policy Area requiring coordination with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), deleting the 25 percent slope constraint for grading activity, and deleting a provision which permits grading within identified constraint areas if mitigation is provided. The MSHCP is more comprehensive in its ability to protect sensitive habitat from insensitive grading activity and adherence to the policies in the MSHCP is required for all new projects. The existing policies contained in the Community Design Element that are redundant and no longer needed are being recommended for deletion. C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.ComlDocument Converter~temp1871438.doc 2 ANALYSIS The General Plan Land Use Map currently being used by the City and the general public does not accurately represent the built environment. For example, the current Land Use Map shows watercourses with urban land uses rather than Open Space, and shows many streets with urban land uses rather than having no designation. This becomes problematic when vacant land is inventoried to project the amount of commercial, industrial and residential construction that will occur in the future. Other proposed changes include properly identifying all City Parks and open space areas as Open Space. In many areas the land uses cut through parcels causing "split" designations on multiple parcels and overlapping computer data sets have caused mislabeled land uses and "sliver" parcels. The Planning Department scoured the Land Use Map that is currently being used. Staff found approximately 170 parcels City wide where the land use either did not match the built environment or the parcels had split designations due to overlapping computer data sets. Planning staff worked with the City's GIS department to create 13 exhibits which indicate the existing land use designations and the proposed land use changes throughout the City. GIS staff also prepared mailing labels and property owners affected by the proposed changes were sent notices of a Proposed Negative Declaration and an exhibit indicating how the proposed change would affect their property. The proposed changes to the Land Use Map will result in a Map that more closely resembles the built environment. A brief summary of the changes in each Land Use Map exhibit is itemized below: Butterfield/Pauba: Many residential parcels are shown as Open Space and several streets are shown with a Low Medium Density Land Use designation. The proposed revisions will adjust the Open Space designations to the parcel boundaries and will remove land use designations from all streets. Butterfield Ranch/Redhawk: A shopping center at the south east corner of Butterfield Stage Road and 79 South is shown as Neighborhood Commercial on the Land Use Map but was developed with Community Commercial land uses and a portion of the site is within Temecula Creek. The proposed revisions show the shopping center as Community Commercial and the creek as Open Space. Chaparral High School: The High School and The Fountains senior condominiums are currently shown as Industrial Park and the water courses are shown with urban land uses. The proposed revisions will change the High School to Public Institutional, The Fountains to Professional Office, and Santa Gertrudis Creek to Open Space. Crowne Hill: The digital shape file for the elementary school and adjacent park do not match the parcel boundaries. The proposed revisions will adjust the school and park boundaries to the parcel lines. Additionally, a large drainage course area west of Ceecee Road and north of DePortola Road is proposed as Open Space. EnfieldlRiverton: Riverton Park is an existing City park shown as Low Medium Residential. The proposed revision to Open Space will indicate its actual use. Great Oak High School: The High School is currently shown as Medium Density Residential, an elementary school and a residential subdivision are "flip-flopped," and a fairway and maintenance area in the golf course are shown as Law Medium Residential. The proposed revisions will show the High School as Public Institutional, will correct the location of the elementary school and change the fairway and maintenance area to Open Space. C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.Com\Document Converter~temp1871438.doc 3 Meadowview: A large lot on the northeast end of the meadow is where watercourses converge before entering the meadow area. The current Map shows this parcel as Very Low Density Residential. The proposed revision will change the designation of this large parcel to Open Space. Also proposed is to change the land use designation for the drainage channel north of Nicolas Road from Low and Medium Density Residential to Open Space. Old Town: A mapping error led to the area surrounding the Moreno Road ring to show as Open Space on the current Map. The proposed revisions shave parcels fronting Old Tawn Front Street to be designated as Community Commercial, the parcels nearest the freeway shown as Highway Tourist Commercial, and the Mary Phillips Senior Center, Fire Station No. 12, History Museum and Sam Hicks Monument Park all shown as Public Institutional. Also, the area far the new Civic Center needs to be changed to Public Institutional. The original Old Town exhibit included with the proposed Negative Declaration that was circulated for public review indicated that the Low Medium Density Residential land use generally bounded by Interstate 15, Mercedes Street, Main Street and Sixth Street was proposed to be changed to Community Commercial. The exhibit attached to this Staff Report has been corrected to indicate there is no proposed change for this area of Old Town. Promenade: The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan originally held a provision to allow the passibility of a Civic Center to be located in this area. With a commitment to build the new Civic Center in Old Town, the Public Institutional Land Use should be removed from the Map in this area of the City. Other proposed revisions include scaling back the amount of Professional Office located at the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Overland Drive because the northerly extension of this area built out as commercial uses, and the alignment of Santa Gertrudis Creek should be changed from Industrial Park and commercial land uses to Open Space. Redhawk/Pechanga: The conceptual Land Use Plan for the Redhawk Specific Plan shows these parcels as Open Space. The proposed revisions will change the Land Use designation for these parcels to be consistent with the Specific Plan, which also shows this area as Open Space. Vintage Hills Elementary: The computer shape file data far the elementary school and the adjacent community center do not match the parcel data. The proposed revisions will make the Land Uses conform to the parcel boundaries. Also, the Low Medium Residential designation has been removed from the streets south of Pauba Road. Wolf Creek North: The existing Land Use Map does not indicate the location of the large drainage channel on the east side of Pechanga Parkway. The proposed revisions will show this drainage course as Open Space, and a linear park along the east side of North Wolf Creek Drive is also proposed to be shown as Open Space. Wolf Creek South: The existing Land Use Map does not indicate the location of the large drainage channel on the east side of Pechanga Parkway. The proposed revisions will show this drainage course as Open Space, and a linear park along the east side of South Wolf Creek Drive is also proposed to be shown as Open Space. Also, the shape file data for the location of the Wolf Creek Fire station and the Medium Density Residential surrounding the fire station does not match parcel boundaries. This data will be adjusted to the parcel boundaries. Finally, the Law Medium Density Residential Land Use will be removed from the streets. C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.GomlDocument Converterltemp1871438.doc 4 Community Design Element: The Chaparral Area section of the Community Design Element was originally adopted to protect sensitive habitat, slopes, and riparian and riverine areas located throughout this area of the City. However, parcel maps in this area that were recorded prior to the City's incorporation have led to development in the Chaparral Area that is not consistent with the General Plan. Proposed new development in the area is subject to standards that differ from prior approvals. Furthermore, the constraints identified in the Chaparral Area create a hardship for development in the remaining portions of this area. During the 2005 Comprehensive Update of the General Plan, the City Council adopted an interim policy to allow density averaging for remaining acreage in the Chaparral Area as a temporary measure to address this issue. The proposed changes to the Chaparral Area text will relax or eliminate some of the constraints contained in the current General Plan, but will also require that all new development activity in this area conform to the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Staff feels that adherence to the MSHCP serves to protect the same goals and objectives that led to the creation of the Chaparral Area policies. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian an August 4, 2007 and mailed to the affected property owners. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA} and based on an Initial Study, determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A proposed Negative Declaration was circulated for public review from July 16, 2007 through August 14, 2007. Comment letters were received from the State of California Department of Transportation District 8, Riverside County Transportation Commission, and the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. Copies of these letters are included as Attachment 3. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and General Plan Community Design Element are consistent with policy direction contained in the City of Temecula General Plan, Municipal Code, adapted Specific Plans, and regional plans and recommends approval of the project. FINDINGS To recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the following findings must be made: The amendments are compatible vuith the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed amendments to the Land Use Map and the Community Design Element meet the goals and policies of the Genera) Plan, and are consistent with the anticipated impacts of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan and the guidelines of the Municipal Code. Rny future development will be subject to the City's C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.ComlDocument Converter~temp1871438.doc 5 General Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the community is maintained as new development occurs. The amendments are compatible with existing and surrounding uses. The proposed amendments to the Land Use Map are representative of the existing built environment, future uses an currently vacant land resulting from approved Planning Applications or approved City projects, a change from urban Land uses to Open Space to identify existing water courses, or the removal of land use designations from dedicated streets throughout the City of Temecula. Therefore, the proposed amendments will be compatible with future uses in the surrounding areas proposed for change. The proposed amendments to the text of the Chaparral Area will not affect the current zoning or amount of development activity permitted in this area of the City. The amendments will not have an adverse effect an the community and are consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed Land Use Map amendments will not conflict with the existing zoning or land uses throughout the City and will result in a Map that more accurately describes the built environment. The proposed amendments to the text of the Chaparral Area will not affect the current zoning or amount of development activity permitted in this area of the City. Therefore, the proposed amendment will result in compatible future development, which is a goal of the General Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 00-_ -Blue Page 7 Exhibit A -Draft CC Resolution 07-_ {Land Use Map) Exhibit B -Draft CC Resolution 07-_ (Community Design Element) 2. Initial Study -Blue Page 8 3. Public Correspondence -Blue Page 9 4. Notice of Public Hearing -Blue Page 10 C:\Program Files (x86)1Neevia.ComlDocument Converter~temp1871438.doc 6 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY CHAIR Simon Housman Rancho Mirage VICE CHAIRMAN Rod Ballance Riverside COMMISSIONERS Arthur Butler Riverside Robin Lowe Hemet John Lyon Riverside Glen Holmes Hemet Melanie Fesmire Intlio STAFF Director Ed Cooper John Guerin Cecilia Lara Sophia Nolasco Barbara Santos anuary 11, 2008 Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner of Temecula Planning Department )0 Business Park Drive ecula CA 92590 O ~y PlanningDepent RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW File No.: ZAP1020FV07 Related File No.: PA06-0340 (Citywide General Plan Amendment) APN: See attached list of Assessor's parcels Mr. Papp: On January 10, 2008, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) found the above-referenced project consistent with the 2007 French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. If you have any questions, please contact John Guerin, Principal Planner, at (951) 955-0982. COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION County Administrative Cenler 4080 Lemon SL, 9" F Aiversid s25oi Edwar C. 51 ~ 955.5132 JG:bks ~ ww~v.rcaluc.ora ~c Director ALUC Staff FG Temecula Senior Apartments Meadowview Community Association I Temecula Valley Unified School District Winchester Meadows Inv. Rancho California Water District Riverside County Flood Control District Riverside County Facilities Management -Attn.: Robert Field Riverside County EDA -Aviation Division -Attn.: Chad Davies Va11ey1ZAP 1020FV07.LTR.doc W E °c E a C N J C N a m m J N N F T U u Z .Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z b ro W c 2 W J J J J J J J J J J j j j j J o~{d F » O > 7 J J 7 ~ ~ j F 6 a D J J~ J 5 ~ EU a_m m O O o x E `o _ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 n~ Ey Z¢ u'S~ L~-+o o`o oo' GO » 3in .n>o`iS Oi S ~ q~ 5& ~~ 5~ q_ N$ $$m~~ ~ o d m m m m m m m N m u O O O N m m m a c9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a' u' R a d 0 0 0 0 q ~_ W K ~ U K J~ K Rte' E ~. K K E E ~ N J U > J J d d 6 d LL 0_ z~~ . ~ ~ E K v v a v E N N E _ "_n ' n U K R a U s ve `" ~' t' ~ a 'H H a E a ' E o o E E a a E E a ' ' n a n a a a E o o m a c E E J~ ~ E o E~ _ y _ _ __ _ a _ E$ E~ E ' o o '~ o 0 0 o a 'c °° u ~U J U > J _ _ c c o 92 f EJ m N m 0 N< 2 ~ 6 Z U U 3 3 n N . . c ,C a 3 3 3 a~ 3 q " w ' ~ ~ n ~ r o " m m w ~ ~ ' r ~ w ~i -rr -~N r¢N ¢ m f 1f G- ¢~ ~ a a~ a~ ¢¢ a~ ¢ Z w Z y m ' ' 'm p.o o a ma jq V N t+ i O p IN O + '- N N OO V 6 N U O ar y 2 w W a F J N ? w K K ~ N O % LL a 6 6 a O~ O O O W O J O O ~~ ~ 5 U ~o > U 5rc J ~5 J rc¢ W 3 ~J ww ~~5z3 w W W E p W J = ( f K ~ U 6 w 1 w K ~ K¢ m m g g J ) ~ U K fC W K W ~ o ~ o o ~ o c~ ~g cJi cJi o o w ow a 0 > > ~~ } } O F > > F p > > F 2 2 U ~ E > > > LL ~ F w ~ ~ a > > ~ w ~ F- O O 6~ O Z O ~ O QZ< Z_ E t - > > j O U U E U U U U U¢ ~ f LL LL U ~ U~ U K _ .~ ~ o: rc v " 2 m v N v ~2` N m "» p~ " °¢ °a ~ ° ° ~ ° ° m ° v~ v v o ° ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ~ v ~ ¢ v z a E a $ d $vi mG w~ n w in m in aO N .nmmw~°n N M Z 2 m 2 Z M 2 2 2 N Z rv 2 Z~ 2 m N C) A N OO O 10 mlp m m ~~ W N ~-p m m 00 W O 0~ C m y OI (p 00NNe- 0 O 0 0 o o O O .=~ O O <of O O d.o O O 00 O O 00 4 O O O o 00~rini ( ~ ~? mm m m mm 'S v ~ m `1 'v mm a''O rnp OO rnp O O «o~(o ~-~NN~- zm ~' m lom mm mm mm mm mo N oo N N oo N N oooon' N N N N m a mm mm pm mm mmmmm y Chaparral High School GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Enfield/Riverton GPA Existing Land Use VL Proposed Land Use VL Meadowview GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Nicolas Road Park GPA Existing Land Use 4~ Proposed Land Use Voorburg Park GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Winchester Creek Park Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Exhibit A to Resolution No. 08-28 (General Plan Land Use Map) Inadvertently not included in staff report and, therefore, was not placed into Sire City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration PROJECT: Planning Application No. PA06-0340 - General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Community Design Element Chaparral Policy Area Amendment APPLICANT: City of Temecula LOCATION: Southwestern Riverside County in and around the City of Temecula. The Planning Area incorporates the current City limits and the approved Sphere of Influence. The Planning Area for the amended General Plan Land Use Map is generally defined by Keller Road on the north, by the San Diego County Line on the south, by the Escarpment of the Santa Ana Mountains on the west, and on the east by Anza Road. The Planning Area for the amended Community Design Element Chaparral Area is generally defined by Pauba Road to the north, Santiago Road to the south, Margarita Road to the east, and Ynez Road to the west. DESCRIPTION: To amend the General Plan Land Use Map by identifying the uses established in the built environment, to identify water courses as Open Space areas, minimize "split" land use designations by correcting mapping errors, revise Specific Plan Land Uses based on recorded map data; and, to amend the Community Design Element Chaparral Area to incorporate the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) removing certain grading constraints which are mitigated under the MSHCP. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will noYhave a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Decaration is July 16, 2007 to August 14, 2007. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 43200 Business Park Drive. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper. X Posting the Site. Notice to Property Owners. X If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Emery Papp at (951) 694-6400. Prepared by: r ~2t.t i o~ ~~wHN ej ( na! re) (Title) G;1Planning~2006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignWlanningWOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.doc City of Temecula Planning Department Agency Distribution List PROJECT: PA06-0340, General Plan Land Use Map Amendment and Community Design Element, Chaparral Area Amendment DISTRIBUTION DATE: July 13, 2007 CASE PLANNER: Emery J. Papp, AICP CITY OF TEMECULA: Building &Safety .........................................(X ) Fire Department ..........................................(X ) Police Department .......................................(X ) Parks & Recreation (TCSD) ..................:......(X ) Planning, Advance ......................................(X ) Public Works ...............................................(X ) .............(X ) STATE: Caltrans ................................................ .......(X ) Fish & Game ........................................ .......(X ) Mines &Geology .................................. .......(X ) Regional Water Quality Control Board.. .......(X ) State Clearinghouse ............................. .........( ) State Clearinghouse (15 Copies) .......... .......(X ) Water Resources .................................. .......(X ) FEDERAL: Army Corps of Engineers ............................(X ) Fish and Wildlife Service .............................(X ) REGIONAL: Air Quality Management District ..................(X ) Western Riverside COG ..............................(X ) CITY OF MURRIETA: Planning ......................................................(X ) RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ......:.........(X ) Airport Land Use Commission .....................(X ) Engineer ......................................................(X ) Flood Control .............................................. (X ) Health Department ...................................... (X ) Parks and Recreation ................................. (X ) Planning Department .................................. (X ) Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)...... (X ) Riverside Transit Agency ............................ (X ) .......... (X ) UTILITY: Eastern Muhicipal Water District ......... ........ (X ) Inland Valley Cablevision ..................... ....... (X ) Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve .. ....... (X ) Southem California Gas ....................... ....... (X ) Southern California Edison .................. ....... (X ) Temecula Valley School District ........... ....... (X ) Metropolitan Water District ................... ....... (X ) OTHER: Pechanga Indian Reservation ..................... (X ) Eastern Information Center ......................... (X ) Local Agency Formation Comm .................. (X ) RCTC .........................................................(X) Homeowners' Association ........................... (X ) Redhawk Wolf Creek Meadowview Crowne Hill G:~Planning12006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design~PlanningWOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.doc City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Planning Application No. 06-0340 (General Plan Land Use Map and Communi Desi n Element Amendments Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Eme J. Pa , AICP 951 694-6400 Project Location Southwestern Riverside County in and around the City of Temecula. The Planning Area incorporates the current City Limits and the approved Sphere of Influence. The Planning Area for the amended General Plan Land Use Map is generally defined by Kefler Road on the north, by the San Diego County Line on the south, by the Escarpment of the Santa Ana Mountains on the west, and on the east by Anza Road. The Planning Area for the amended Community Design Element Chaparral Area is generally defined by Pauba Road to the north, Santiago Road to the south, Margarita Road to the east, and Ynez Road to the west. Pro ect S onsor's Name and Address Ci of Temecula General Plan Desi nation All General Plan desi nations, Ci -wide Zonin All Zonin Districts, Ci -wide Description of Project A General Plan Amendment to "clean-up" the Land Use Map for approximately 170 City-wide parcels, which includes parcels with "split" land use designations or incorrectly labeled land use designations due to General Plan mapping errors, to identify water courses as Open Space areas, to remove land use designations from dedicated street right-of-way, to revise land uses within Specific Plan areas based on recorded map data, and; to revise the text of the Community Design Element regarding grading policies in the Chaparral Area of the City which will make the policies contained in the Community Design Element consistent with the Western Riverside Coun Multi-s ecies Habitat Conservation Plan. Surroundin Land Uses and Settin All land uses and settin s ci ide Other public agencies whose approval None is re wired GiPlanning~2006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningVnitial Study -Final draft.DOC 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources A riculture Resources Noise Air Qualit Po ulation and Housin Biolo ical Resources Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation Geolo and Soils Trans ortation/Trafric Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service S stems H drolo and Water Quali Mandato Findin s of Si nificance Land Use and Plannin X None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECIARATION will be re ared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to b~ the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is r uired. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is r uired, but it must anal a onl the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed. project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Emery J. Papp, AICP Printed Name For G:Wlanning12006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignWlanningUnidal Sludy -Final dmft.D(K 2 Butterfield / Pauba GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use ~, Butterfield Ranch / Redhawk GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Q Chaparral High School GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Crowne Hill GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Q Enfield/Riverton GPA Existing Land Use VL Proposed Land Use ~, VL Great Oak High School GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Q Meadowview GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Old Town GPA Exisiting Land Use Proposed Land Use Promenade GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Redhawk/Pechanga GPA Vintage Hills Elementary GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Wolf Creek North GPA Existing Land Use ..~' Proposed Land Use Wolf Creek South GPA Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Q 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: u, S [ ~,i'' ' S4 az ' y .. ': ~v_~:-~-~,a~..iF s.~r~,:i~site_ °5 o rwmeo~ .~.. f ft. o[a x.'.~im'a ''x ~*'~", ~i .lm ctn.: a- Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic hi hwa . c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or uali of the site and its surroundin s? X d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the X area? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 1.a, b, c, d. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula 5ich has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes on properties within the built environment. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on scenic vistas, will not damage or destroy scenic resources, degrade the visual quality of the City, or create new sources of light or glare. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 1.a, b, c, d. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, no significant effects on scenic vistas, scenic resources, visual character, or daytime and nighttime views are anticipated. G:Wlanning\20061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesigMPlanning\Inifial Study -Final draft.DOC 3 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a. convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and X Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-a ricultural use? b- Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion x of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: 2-a., b., c. No Impact. According to figure OS-3 of the City of Temecula General Plan, neither the properties impacted by the proposed Land Use changes nor the properties within the Chaparral Area have been identified as land that is currently in agricultural production, nor in the past been known to be used for agricultural purposes. None of the subject properties are under a Williamson Act contract, zoned for agricultural use, nor considered private or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated as a result of this proposed project. G:~Planning12006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningUnitial Study -Final draft.DOC 4 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: ~ ~~ ~ a ~ i s " g ~u , _ ~z ~ - ~ a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air uali Ian? X b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existin or ro'ected air uali violation? X c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient X air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors ? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of eo le? X Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 3.a, b, c, d, e. No Impact. The Air Quality Element of the General Plan addresses compliance with the ~rrent Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin. In general, the proposed changes to the ~d Use Map would result in less intense uses under this amendment. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in population or growth resulting from the proposed General Plan Larid Use Map amendment that could generate additional vehicular trips. Therefore, no conflicts with the regional air quality plan will result, and no adverse impacts will occur. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 3.a, b, c, d, e. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, no significant effects on air quality are anticipated. .~ G:~Planning~2006tPA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningVnitial Study -Final draft.DOC 5 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? .~ ~ ~, .~'t . ~ ~ -F+ r~ ro` ~ m ,~ ~ enLa ° ~C7~ 1 9 r .~~~~ ` ~ 'x i ~~ ~- s F . ~ .+ .r ~f ' b ~ f ~ ~ ~ a. Have a substant al adverse effect ei the r - - ~ ~ ~ `~ directly or g y p throu h habitat modifications on an s ecies identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the X California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water -Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, X coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, x or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or X ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat x conservation Ian? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 4.a., b., c., d. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built .environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will .not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on flora, fauna, wetlands, or conflict with any ordinances or habitat conservation plans. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area ~j 4.a, b, c, d. No Impact. Temecula is located in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat --' Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area. The overall goal of the MSHCP is to maintain and restore biological G:\Planning120061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design\PlanningVnitlal Sludy -Final draft.DOC 6 diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support diversity in natural areas within Westem Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. The MSHCP identifies five locations within the Planning Area that may contain regional wildlife corridor +kages. The proposed changes to the text of the Community Design Element regarding the Chaparral Policy .,rea will reinforce the MSHCP goals and objectives. No impacts are expected as a result of the proposed Community Design Element changes. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: .~ ~°3i~a ~ 3 ~r~ ~. ~ ~ "~ ~mr s d,~ ~S mG 4~nle`~$,te ~ '~ . ' r ~ r ~x sue i~ ~ c rr f f $' :r - t' ' ~ ~ .. < . v.~*: ., ~ . x. , orma a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of 1~ ~ rated .,~ ~-, ac[,s.~ :I ~~J m aet a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeolo ical resource ursuant to Section 15064.5? X c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or uni ue eolo is feature? X d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: General Plan Land Use Map S.a, b, c, d. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive Gean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. e proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and I not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use.changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on known cultural resources. Existing protections are in place for undiscovered cultural resources including standard conditions of approval placed on ground disturbance and coordination with Native American Tribes pursuant to SB 18. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 5.a, b, c, d. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Bemuse the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, no significant effects on air quality are anticipated. .~ G:1Planning120061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanning\Initial Study - Final draft.DOC 7 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: ,~ ~~~, ~~"P nir~~ , ~ ~~ ~~ ~~. ~':_ ~ ~ x ~', r' ~'4_"` %~ g'a""~~s:,„,tc'~~ j}.~,;-~~•~'~' `"x~ ~,, en4~al~z S3~ fwanf:Fl e ~ ~s,"i i~Les~Than :. ` ~ , ~ iitt~.. a ~` ."r,~i,t9ni ;. '`~ "~!9 ~ ca ,:~:ti,4ssu~is`and~`~"SL'"""'Mn g3"n"•Rx~ma .miax- ' °t1* Oct"~CSb"~i es "~ ~ ~ "' ~~ d "~ ~ '~ ~ ' ~~ n a ~. ni ~ e o ~4vn{ ~ Cf~. w~ a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, inGuding the risk of loss, injury, or death involvin i. The rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? x (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Stron seismic round shakin ? x iii. Seismic-related round failure, includin li uefaction? X iv. Landslides? x b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral x s readin ,subsidence, li uefaction or colla se? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1.8-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial X risks to life or ro ert ? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of x wastewater? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 6.a.i., a.ii., a.iii., a.iv., b., c., d., e. No Impact. Temecula is located in a seismically active area, and projects developed pursuant to the General Plan will expose additional people and structures to ground shaking hazards associated with earthquakes. However, Temecula is largely built-out, with remaining development limited to master-planned communities, specific plan areas, and in-fill development lots. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific.° Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. No significant impacts due to geology and soils are expected to result from the proposed Land Use changes. G:~Planning~2006WA06A340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignWlanningVnitial Study - Finat draft.DOC B General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area a.i., a.ii., a.iii., a.iv., b., c., d., e. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community resign Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Bemuse the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, no significant effects on geology and soils are anticipated. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: ,._.. . - ~~, s~~- ,: ~~~ ~ ,. _, _t_ ,I r ~ ~ es °~` G ~ ~ ..: , n o s a . m ~. a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or X dis osal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous X materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- X quarter mile of an existin or pro osed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, X would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or , where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the X project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro'ect area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X workin in the ro'ect area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuation Ian? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where X residences are intermixed with wildlands? G:\Planning12006\PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignWlanningVnitial Study - Fnal draft.DOC 9 Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 7.a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. No significant impacts are expected due to an adverse effect from hazards or hazardous materials.. Existing protections are in place for emergency response in the event of a hazardous spill or other man-made or natural disaster. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 7.a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, the project will not impact issues related to hazards and hazardous materials, or the movement of these goods through the City, and no significant effects related 1 to hazards or hazardous materials are anticipated. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: - ~ _-~ ~ ~ < .~ mum ~ z, ry~t ~ e ~ G~ t z" 'TMm 3 i~ ~e '+r.kP ten6all „gx '4+ `~ ,~ t , -t '~.5 *#~§~"~ ~, ~ ~~`"' `"~~~~~~~ ~ , e alt° sS~TI'icant klnlas,~ fi ~1~'e5~~'h"~n ~ ~ ~;75r '~ f ~ `~ $"' ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ k: tt .~ , ~~Si§blG~cartC. i ~ t a Y 1 +I#~-.s~acl r aW`t..pi`- z.ta ,..,ai's s4.T9 v "q~$pv'ry% ad ~- '~ l m » . n redz. ac s+ ~.,~¢~:, ..~.a: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water X ualit ? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of X pre-e:usting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which ermits have been ranted ? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in X substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river, or substantiall increase the rate or .. G:V'Ianning~20061PA06-0340 GPA land Use and Community DesignlPlanningUnitial Study -Final draR.DOC 10 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: ~p~~~ S r"-C.s "~9'"a~s~. iaSp,~sfi ~ v ~' tµ... tri t,~si7i~ } ~ _ r ~i-';"`'~ `~ N,~Z ~..s'.^a "/° ~.' L'+' 1~"k.- , _ _ . A3`hf st?3' 3~~x "aiy C , +"y~d~'C i° D 11 EJ~ ~{SIgAy14 D~'059'~ 9cer~ fi ,~ 'Y O: T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ }XSµ~.y f} ~" I y, `'A s~^~e~F%dn` c'aLa ~ 3~ ~ ~.P ~ ~D IfDil2~( .. . -.r..., ~ S+t uessatM SU ~nronoaf~o ,. `% ~ ~"~1 amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodin on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of X olluted runoff? f. Require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan? x g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation X ma ? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would im ede or redirect flood flows? X i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a x result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation b seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: ~neral Plan Land Use Map 8.a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i. j. No Impact. The Rancho California Water District supplies most of the domestic and commercial water to Temecula. RCWD water is drawn from the Murrieta-Temecula groundwater basin and supplemented with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). Temecula is also served by the Eastern Municipal Water District, which derives its water primarily from MWD but also draws groundwater from wells in the Hemet and San Jacinto areas. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. The proposed arendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific.° Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will alter the drainage patterns within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Land Use changes. G:Wlanning~2006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design~Planningllnitial Study -Final drafLDOC 11 General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 8.a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i. j. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, no significant impacts on water or water resources are anticipated. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a. u. ~onnicl wim any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted X for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 9.a, b, c. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. In general, the proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in population or growth resulting from the proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment that could generate additional impacts. Therefore, no conflicts with any local or regional air quality, transportation, or growth plan will result, and no adverse impacts will occur. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will alter G:U'Ianning~20061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningUnitial SWdy -Final draft.DOC 12 the drainage patterns within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on any existing .dbitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Land Use changes. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 9. a, b, c. No Impact Temecula is located in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area. The overall goal of the MSHCP is to maintain and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support diversity in natural areas within Western Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is crnsistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant impacts with regard to land use and planning. 10, MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. esu t in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a lopl X eneral plan, s ecific Ian or other land use plan? Comments: 10a. and 10.b. No Impact. According to the California Geological Survey, no known mineral resources exist within the City of Temecula. Development pursuant to the proposed amendments to the General Plan will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource. No impact will result. ~~ G:~Pknning~2006V'A06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningUnitial SWdy - Final draRDOC 13 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: j ~'~~~5 ~~~`~''~~'~''~'„,a Lam;} ~~6~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~`~ c'4~ G~ ~y~?SQq Plfl~fi ~ ~~~xa ,~ ~ ~ .e *~m 3- ~ sr +~*ar'' C a a,~ "u. ~~5, .a CSS,% ; .~ti.' - .~ z~, f`°~s `n' '"~N ; Ti^ " ~ ni~ =~ " ~ ` ' 3 ( ~~ ~ . < w ?fy. y ~ ,z , L r IGa Y. a .$ s 0f1~'v-" C~:#7 ~..~~ .=s ,ati +fsssaee~nd8 'n ~7ifa~maUoti.Sau ~"~' ~s ~ am"~'`ct. _ .., o~ safe e, elfi~:.actt„ i •lm`~act. a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other X a encies? b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive round borne vibration or round borne noise levels? X c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ' X ro ect? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without the ro'ect? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or , where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the X project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the ' X ro ect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 17. a., b., c., d., e., f. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. In general, the proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in existing noise levels resulting from the proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment .will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will impact noise levels within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as ,...~ part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to G:1Planning120061PA06-0340 GPA land Use and Community DesignlPlanningUnitial Study -Final draft.000 14 review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently .reviewed as those applications are received. As a result, no significant noise effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. ,eneral Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 1'1. a., b., c., d., e., f. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. These policies protect riverine and riparian areas which exist within the Chaparral Area. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications curcently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant impacts with regard to noise. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. No significant noise impacts are anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? necessitating the construction of replacement housing ~ ~ ~ ~ X c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 12.a, b, c. No Impact. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. In general, the proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in existing noise levels resulting from the proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan signations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will Ine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula G:IPlanningV?OO6V'A06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignlPlanningVnifial Study -Final draft.DOC 15 which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that wi. impact population or housing within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on population, housing, nor displace people. Asa result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of this project. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 12.a, b, c. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraihts specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. These policies protect riverine and riparian areas which exist within the Chaparral Area. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant impacts with regard to population, housing, or displacement of people. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ,~,`~ a i ~,~~"",~ ~ ,~'t~'VX .u'a~~~"~•~x`•''e~,sc. h . r c,~ ^~-'f`y~.,~.k~s rain ~~ofe {~~ ,~~ ~~5 ~ ' ` ~,w, ~.:z.~ 7~r&. ~-jssuesa ~iSU r6n ntgmatiort ~ u~` ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1 n~"" ~ a * ~ ' ~ p '~ ~m~ ' ~ , . iat ~ . F .w n et „~~ act ,- 6 a. Fire rotection? X b. Police rotection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks? X e. Other ublic facilities? X Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 13. a., b., c., d., e. No Impact. Residential, commercial and industrial development pursuant to the General Plan will continue to occur throughout the Temecula Planning Area. As development occurs, incremental increase in demand for public services will result. The Growth ManagemenbPublic Facilities Element includes goals, policies, and performance standards for new development, relative to the provision of each of the public services listed above at desired service levels. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only G:Wlanning120061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design\Planning~nitial Sludy -Final dmft.DOC 16 currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will '~ subject to review under CEOA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are . ~~ceived. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will impact population or housing within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on population, housing, nor displace people. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of the proposed Land Use changes. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area. 13. a, b, c, d, e. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. These policies protect riverine and riparian areas which exist within the Chaparral Area. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant effects on public services. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: ., y~ '% . y ~ ~£ ~~'t ~ sT.5 {",~ V ~ $•.i,: ~ 4tZY Y5 NF ~y ~ } 5~y. ~:,yxtwDtenllaily'~ "~ 1 ' ~ ~ - ~ F ' ~ ~ ~ ~iy ~ ~,~' h,., ~ S,~.a'i~ ~~2'ti #~~~~ tW ~z,~,,.,~ ..w,._r,' ~ , ~-~ ~ r ~, ~ s. ifiDantfi ~ n ~ ~~4 ~ ~ r~~~M"4g ~ n`t Np. ~a ~~ ~` ..s ,,.... ..< .. ,.,.assit0s'aru4§u n In mYaGo ~~ ^` ~ t " t d . ~ s+_ -,..a .~.a8 +,.cl«~~ m a _, 2 ,b ~ ;,,;. u~ am ac[m. _d3i aCl i , a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be X accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an X adverse h sical effect on the environment? Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 14. a, b. No Impact. Residential, commercial and industrial development pursuant to the General Plan will continue to occur throughout the Temecula Planning Area. As development occurs, incremental increase in demand for recreatiohal facilities will result. The Open Space/Conservation Element includes goals, policies, and performance standards for new development, relative to the provision of each of the recreation service levels. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan ~+~signations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will e the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only ~Grrently vacant land is proposed as Open Spat, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes G:1Planningt20061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesigMPlanningVnitial Study -Final draft.DOC 17 are on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will impact population or housing within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications art. proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on population, housing, nor displace people. As a result, no significant effects are anticipated from the implementation of the proposed Land Use changes. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 74. a, b. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is cronsistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. These policies protect riverine and riparian areas which exist within the Chaparral Area. Because the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely affects an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant effects on recreational facilities. 15. TRANSPORTATIO NlTRAFFIC. Would the project: 3 S:Yx '~` x 'u:`~~'-~ x. ~ar5 Aix Yz~Y., xe~q:~~s" .4~:t~.£3tks' ~h t ~ .t"*vaa *u~ ~p tWll '°"M, y,° S ~'c'~ Y~iz"y r ~~s~ c~ .~` 1 ~» tN ¢~ "~x~ 4 &"° ,. t gn~0 s~ d gnifitU~e~SS4 le 3 Than .. .: ,~ { . ~, ~ ; r w`9.~ . . , ,~.` Jssties '3nd 5u ~'" n finfor'm l S °` mfiifi~ant s .'~ ' 4` R~~ "~~~ n "' ~ ' ~a ~ inM ` '~ a ~ a. ,, . . ...,,.. a i a a2~ _ ^ . .- „S .~x f a ,~ iai c' 1 cd ed: ~v . ,--' ~, I "' Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ,45Jm ct.-_;` relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in X either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or con estion at intersections ? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion X mana ement a enc for desi Hated roads or hi hwa s? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that X results in substantial safe risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or X incom atible uses e. ., farm a ui ment ? e. Result in inade uate emer enc access? X f. Result in inade uate arkin ca aci ? X g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, X bic cle racks ? G:1Planning\20061PA06-0340_GPA Land Use and Community Design\Planning\Inifial Study -Final draft.DOC 18 Comments: General Plan Land Use Map .5. a, b, c, d, e, f, g. No Impact. Circulation infrastructure throughout the Planning Area identified on the Land Use Map has already been constructed or has been planned and modeled in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The average daily trips (ADT) assigned to undeveloped land in the Planning Area, located north of Temecula in the sphere of influence, were also modeled in the Circulation Element. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. In general, the proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in population or growth resulting from the proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment that could generate additional impacts or vehicle trips. Therefore, no conflicts with any local or regional air quality, transportation, or growth plan will result, and no adverse impacts will occur. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and wilt not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Pian designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula which has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill" lots. Future development applications will subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will alter the drainage patterns within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. New development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on any existing habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Land Use changes. The amended Land Use map will result in less intense land uses which will result in fewer average daily vehicle trips and, therefore, a beneficial effect on traffic circulation. Future development applications, which will contribute to ADT, are subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Use Map will not have an adverse effect on any existing local or regional plans or policies, and will not impact multi-modal transportation or the movement of goods and services throughout the Planning Area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Land Use changes. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 15. a, b, c, d, e, f, g. No Impact. The proposed text changes to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area will remove certain grading constraints specific to this area of the City provided that any newly proposed grading activity is consistent with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. These policies protect riverine and riparian areas which exist within the Chaparral Area. cause the proposed amendment to the General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area largely cts an area of the City of Temecula which already contains developed parcels or areas with Planning Applications currently under review, and because projects which could alter watercourses would require review G:Wlanning\20061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design\PlanningUnitial Study -Final d2ft.DOC 19 by responsible agencies, the proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant effects with regard to transportation and traffic. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: h ~ ~ i E "may, FY ~; ~• p n .v~ Nfh~~. .,.,.w:~'T+~~Y.TM.^..~c'~'`ISS~SC52*~'SU 4Ln RORfI ~ ~Efij SOUISES } " 4~ - "' '~ . , ~ .r~' .~ v N: 31 - ;~ , cr v ... kirn ra eV q `act":: : * ~ rn a ~F: ~z7t a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X a livable Re Tonal Water Quali Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant X environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant X environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are X new or ex anded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected X demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the ro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs? X g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and re ulations related to solid waste? X Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 16. a, b, c, d, e, f, g. No Impact. The City of Temecula certified an EIR for the 2005 Comprehensive General Plan Update. This EIR was reviewed by all regional utilities, agencies, and special districts that provide services within the Planning Area identified on the Land Use Map. The certified EIR indicates that the provision of services can be met for the expected buildout conditions based on the Land Use Map. The project is a comprehensive clean-up of the existing General Plan Land Use Map. In general, the proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense -uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. This example corrects an error on the map, but does not change the built environment and, as a result, there will be no increase in population or growth resulting from the proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment that could generate the need for additional utilities or services. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map are representative of the built environment and will not directly lead to new development because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment will not conflict with General Plan G:~Planning~20061PA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design~PlanningVnitlal Sludy -Final draft.DOC 20 designations, zoning, or development standards within the City. The implementation of these amendments will refine the Land Use Map by making the Map "parcel specific." Of the proposed Land Use changes, the only currently vacant land is proposed as Open Space, or as the site of a new Civic Center in Old Town Temecula hich has already been evaluated in a previously adopted Negative Declaration. All other proposed changes ~~e on properties within the built environment or are vacant "in-fill° lots. Future development applications will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as applications are received. The proposed changes to the Land Use map will not directly lead to new development that will require the need for additional utilities or services within the Planning Area because no new Development Plan applications are proposed as part of this project. Future development applications for in-fill lots and within specific plan areas will be subject to review under CEQA and any potential impacts will be independently reviewed as those applications are received. Adoption of the proposed amended Land Uses will not have an adverse effect on the provision of services and no impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed Land Use changes. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area 16. a, b, c, d, e, f, g. No Impact. Temecula is located in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area. The overall goal of the MSHCP is to maintain and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support diversity in natural areas within Westem Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. The proposed changes to the text of the Community Design Element regarding the Chaparral Policy Area will reinforce the MSHCP goals and objectives and will permit development activity in appropriate areas while protecting resources. The proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant impacts with regard to the provision of services in this area. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate X a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histo or rehisto ? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a X project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects ? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, X either directly or indirectly? G:Wlanning12006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesignV'IanningVnitial Sludy -Final draft.DOC 21 Comments: General Plan Land Use Map 17.a. No Impact. Development pursuant to General Plan policy may affect some biological and cultural resources in the Planning Area. Development of the Planning Area pursuant to the General Plan was analyzed in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR -SCH # 2003061041 pages 5.4-1 through 5.5-6) that was prepared for the 2005 Comprehensive General Plan Update. The proposed amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map will have positive impacts to plant and animal species because watercourses will be designated as Open Space, preserving habitat and linkages. No impacts are expected as a result of the proposed Land Use Map changes. 17.b. No Impact. The project is an amendment to a long-term community plan to guide future development within the Temecula Planning Area. The cumulative effect of such future development was analyzed in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR -SCH # 2003061041 pages 7.1-1 through 7.1-10) that was prepared for the 2005 Comprehensive General Plan Update. Mitigation measures were proposed to reduce the potential impacts to a level that is Less Than Significant. The environmental findings for the adoption of the 2005 Comprehensive General Plan Update included a Statement of Overriding Consideration for issues related to Air Quality and Transportation. The EIR was certified in March, 2005. The proposed changes to the Land Use Map would result in less intense land uses under this amendment, such as identifying water courses as Open Space rather than having urban Land Uses assigned to them and removing Land Use designations from local streets. Other proposed changes are in-kind changes, where for example, a school was indicated in the wrong location and underlying parcel data indicates a typical residential subdivision. The proposed mapping change simply swaps the location of the school and the subdivision. The proposed amendment to the Land Use Map also represents minor incremental changes in the built environment such as the approval of a new Civic Center in the Old Town area of the City, and will correct mapping errors created by overlapping layers of electronic data. Therefore, the cumulative amendments to the' j Land Use Map will create no significant impacts. J 17.c. No Impact. The purpose of the General Plan is to guide long-term development that ensures land use compatibility and to provide a safe living and working environment for the residents of the Planning Area. The General Plan is anticipated to result in an overall beneficial effect on people. No adverse impact on people will result from implementation of the amended Land Use Map for the General Plan. General Plan Community Design Element, Chaparral Area- 17.a. No Impact The proposed changes to the text of the Community Design Element regarding the Chaparral Policy Area will reinforce the MSHCP goals and objectives in this area of the City. No impacts are expected as a result of the proposed Community Design Element changes. 17.b. No Impact. The proposed changes to the text of the Community Design Element regarding the Chaparral Policy Area will reinforce existing MSHCP goals and objectives and will permit development activity in appropriate areas while protecting resources. The proposed changes to the Community Design Element are not expected to result in any significant cumulative impacts in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. 17.c. No Impact. The purpose of the General Plan is to guide long-term development that ensures land use compatibility and to provide a safe living and working environment for the residents of the Planning Area. The General Plan is anticipated to result in an overall beneficial effect on people. No adverse impact on people will result from implementation of the amended Community Design Element of the General Plan. G:1Planning\2006U'A06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community Design\PlanningUnifial Study -Final draft.DOC 22 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or ~gative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following attached sheets. a. Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated;' describe the mitigation measures which were in~rporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. SOURCES City of Temecula General Plan. (April 12, 2005) 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. (April 12, 2005) City of Temecula Civic Center Mitigated Negative Declaration (June 27, 2006) 4. Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 5. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. G:~Planning~2006WA06-0340 GPA Land Use and Community DesigMPianningUnitial Study -Final draR.DOC 23 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ITEM NC). 29 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department for the month of January 2008. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 65 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations including 6 applications for public hearings during the month of January. The new public hearing cases are as follows: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3 MAJOR MODIFICATION 1 MINOR MODIFICATION 1 Special Projects & Long Range Planning Activities The Long Range Planning Division commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities currently in progress are described in the paragraphs below: Temecula Regional Hospital -The Riverside County Superior Court overturned the City Council's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project and staff has worked with the applicant and City Attorney's office to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report to address issues related to noise, traffic mitigation and an off-site contaminated groundwater plume. Each Planning Application that was originally approved went through the approval process a second time, including Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. Staff processed three contracts with sub-consultants to manage the special studies required forthe Supplemental EIR. Planning Applications were submitted on July3, 2007. A Notice of Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Reportwassent to the State on July 6, 2007. The Supplemental EIR was released for public review from November 5, 2007 to December 5, 2007. A Planning Commission meeting was held on January 9, 2008 and the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and approve the project as proposed including all of the associated Planning Applications. This project was approved by the City Council on January 22, 2008. The CEQA challenge period for the Final EIR will expire on February 22, 2008. (PAPP) General Plan Land Use Map Update -Planning staff and GIS have completed revision exhibits that explain the necessary changes to the Land Use Map caused by overlapping data sets, differences in conceptual plans versus recorded maps, and changes in the built environment. Some examples of changes include streets currently shown as residential will have no land use designation, Specific Plan areas will be modified to reflect recorded maps, and new park and school sites will be noted as Open Space and Public Institutional Facilities. All property owners affected by the proposed map changes will be notified by mail prior to any hearing. A Planning Commission hearing was held on August 15, 2007. The City has received a letter from the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) stating that prior to adoption of the proposed land use changes; the City must go through the ALUC public hearing process to determine that the proposed land use changes are consistent with the Airport Land Use Consistency Plan. An ALUC hearing was scheduled for January 10, 2008 where a finding of consistency was made. This item is scheduled for City Council on February 26, 2008. (PAPP) General Plan Housing Element Update -Staff has been attending WRCOG workshops on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment in preparation for the update of the City's Housing Element. SCAG released the Final Regional Housing Needs Assessment numbers to cities and agencies in the region in July 2007. State law requires the City to adopt an update to the Housing Element by June 30, 2008 and it must be certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD} by December 31, 2008. The City has entered into an agreement with Environmental Science Associates to assist with the update of the Housing Element. Planning staff has prepared a task listfor each department thatwill assist in the effort, and each department has completed its tasks. A timeline has been prepared that ensures the process will be completed on time. The City Council must certify the updated Housing Element prior to June 30, 2008. A draft version of the Hauling Element was sent to HCD on February 12, 2008 to begin its 60-day review and comment period. Staff anticipates a City Council hearing will be held on June 10, 2008. (PAPP} Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Area -Staff is undergoing an opportunities and constraints analysis of the properties contained within the Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Plan area to develop strategies to assist property owners with the construction of needed infrastructure and services. This area is lacking paved roadways, water transmission lines, wastewater collection, cable television, etc. Because of the relatively few properties in the area, assessment districts may be too costly for property owners. Staff needs to map the existing flood plain and complete a slope analysis to create a comprehensive constraints map of the area. Staff met with the Council Subcommittee in late February to brief the Council on staff strategies for bringing much needed services into the area. It was determined that a public workshop should be held to solicit input from area residents. Workshops were held on March 29, 2007 and May 15, 2007, with about 60 Nicolas Valley residents attending each workshop. Staff has been working on creating a conceptual land use plan and conceptual financing options to pay far needed road improvements. A third workshop was held on November 29, 2007 where information on infrastructure options and recommended density was provided to residents and interested parties. The results of a survey conducted that evening indicated that a majority of property owners favor the formation of an assessment District and favor increased density. Staff held a briefing meeting with the Nicolas Valley City Council Subcommittee on January 31, 2008 to discuss findings and to seek further direction. Staff will prepare and present a status report to the full City Council in March 2008. (PAPP) Transit Center and Transit System Planning -Staff met with SANDAG, North County Transit District and City of Escondido staff to view the Escondido Transit Center and discuss transit planning concepts. The focus of the discussion centered on master planning efforts that identify land uses that support transit use which leads to an increase in transit use. Additionally, staff will be meeting with RTA and Riverside County Flood Control staff to discuss completion of the environmental documentation, which is necessary before FTA funds can be used forthe design of the Temecula Transit Center. Staff will also be meeting with RTA staff later this month to discuss a new alternative fuel Trolley service route, which will become operational after the Down's Fuel Center improvements are completed. (WEST) Heritage Tree Ordinance -Staff has prepared a Heritage Tree Ordinance which will serve to protect certain identified tree species and other large diameter trees throughout the City. The draft Ordinance includes a policy manual and a tree inventory. Staff proposes revisions to the policy manual and tree inventory, but feels the Ordinance can move forward independently while the policy manual and tree inventory are revised. Staff anticipates bringing this item to the City Council in March 2008. {PAPP) Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance -AB 1881 requires local governments to adapt the State of California recently adopted Model Ordinance or an equally effective ordinance by 2010. Due to the severity of the water situation across the State, staff is pursuing revisions to the City's existing Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance in advance afthe 2010 deadline. Staff has completed a first draft of the revised standards and is working with staff from other Departments to ensure consistency. Staff is also working with the water agencies to ensure consistency with their water conservation goals. Staff anticipates bringing a draft ordinance to the Planning Commission in March or April. (WEST} Massage Ordinance -Staff is working with the Temecula Police Department to develop a new massage ordinance that is more restrictive than the existing ordinance and will be implemented and monitored directly by the Police Department. The proposed ordinance will require each employee to undergo several hundred hours of training, to wear identification at all times and includes more severe penalties for violators and business owners. Temecula PD will be scheduling briefing meetings with members of the City Council. {PAPP) ^ Hillside Development Policy-The policies are being examined far integration into the draft- grading ordinance. Staff is working with GIS to analyze topography, soil types, environmental (habitat), and other constraints. (PAPP) ^ Procedures to Implement CEQA -The Planning Department has hired Environmental Science Associates to prepare a policy document that will identify thresholds of significance to provide direction to staff regarding the level of environmental analysis required for new projects. This project will also include local guidelines and a procedure manual for processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of local exemptions, significance thresholds, and procedures for the City to contract for the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports. This effort has been expanded to include internal procedures for coordinating the environmental review of Capital Improvement Projects. (KITZEROW DAMKO) ^ Sustainable Development Program -Staff has been participating on a subcommittee of the WRCOG Planning Directors TAC to review and develop a recommendation regarding the California Green Building program; a voluntary program thatthe BIA is supporting. The Sub committee recommended that the program be endorsed by the WRCOG Executive Committee. The subcommittee also requested to continue to develop a comprehensive green building program for all building types and to develop a municipal building policy for local jurisdictions to implement. As a result of the WRCOG Executive Committee action, staff will be bringing forward a resolution in support of the California Green Building program. (WEST) ^ Santa Margarita Area Annexation -Staff continues to work with the consultant on the draft Environmental Impact Report for the annexation area. Staff is also reviewing the draft the Plan for Municipal Services, an application requirement of the Local Agency Formation Commission for the expansion of Sphere of Influence and the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. (WEST) `~~ ` ~''. "'~~ ~~ } ,~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ 6 ~r ~ ~~ }!_ ` •~1( -~~ ~~ ~~ n-rrrT7lfl~ n *„~ _ /~ \ , ~ ~ F ~ ~~~~ 1. ~\f y,,, ~y~~~` ~, \ ~/ L, y, •`,~ ~' v~ ~ ~ \~ r ~ ~ ~''; j ~ l %, t ~~ ~;~ J 1 i` Ji X% . ~~',~,\ ~ ~_ \~ ,~W ' Y Cis, ~~ `~y /'~ ' Y~ ~~ /~~ ~~.r II!I ~'`~ v ~~'`~~}~ 1 i~,~', r ~ V %~~ 1~ ~~<~' ~,~ i j~, A~ ~' ,, ~ r ~ ~ '' ~ ~ , / ~ ,,. ~~~- ~ A, ~~~ -'~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ \, 7 ~ ~ QP~~~ ~~~ ~ 1 ~~ i fl S r.. 1 ~~ f >. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , J '~ ~ ~ ~ \~, . , \~ 1 ~~. ~~ ~`~ Paos-ooo5 ~~,~ ~ ~ ~-~~i , ~--,;- - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~: / ~: t C/ 4~ Legend Planning Status - NovlDec 2007 0 1. Recently Approved 0 2. Scheduled for Hearing • 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting ~~ oV ~ hmH.~U DDS tlu ~! 1 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~a ivay ~;r ~bnt.~rxux~ ~- ~1' " ti J ~~~ ~~ ~ ,~ Planning Agenda Report 01-01-2008 through 01-31-2008 1. Recently Approved APN # • PA07-0316 Promenade Mall Ring Rd Plan 910130072 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS A Major Modification to PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road. Site modifications include additional traffic signals, additional all way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage, pedestrian enhancements and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications. Submitted Date Approved Date 11 /9/2007 1 /22/2008 1 of 4 Planning Agenda Report 01-01-2008 through 01-31-2008 2. Scheduled for Hearing - APN # • PA07-0229 Temecula Villas 922260018 CHRISTINE DAMKO A Development Plan application for the development and construction of 274 apartment units within 16 buildings located on the southwest corner of First Street and Pujol Street (Former Pre-App PR06-0020). Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision 8/9/2007 9/20/2007 3/5/2008 APN # • PA07.0289 Max FPS Gaming MCUP 921830070 KATIE LECOMTE A Minor Conditional Use Permit to authorize Max FPS Gaming to have an indoor video gaming facility (LAN Center) located within a 1,400 square foot suite at 41493 Margarita Road, Suite 102 in the Bel Villagio shopping center. The gaming facility proposes to have 34 gaming computers and 6 X-Box consoles. The proposed hours of operation are Mon-Thur 11 a.m.-12 a.m.; Fri & Sat 11 a.m. - 2 a.m.; & Sundays 11 a.m. to 10 a.m.). Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date I Planning Commision 10/16/2007 3/5/2008 APN # • PA07-0323 Fresh & Easy Market 959050006 DANA SCHUMA A Major Modification to the approved Development Plan for Redhawk Pavilion located at 44060 Margarita Road. The project proposes to reconfigure a portion of the site and redesign Building 1 to accommodate a new 15,743 square foot building for Fresh & Easy Market. (Related to PA07-0324) Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision 11 /15/2007 12!13/2007 3/5/2007 APN # • PA07-0324 Fresh & Easy Market 959050006 DANA SCHUMA A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for a specialty market (Fresh & Easy) with the incidental sale of beer and wine in a Neighborhood Commercial zone located at 44060 Margarita Road. (Related to PA07-0323) Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision 11/15/2007 12/13/2007 3/5/2008 APN # • PA08-0001 Hana Sushi 921320041 DANA SCHUMA A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the incidental sale of alcoholic beverages at an existing restaurant (Nana Sushi) located at 27576 Ynez Road in the Temecula Town Center. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Directors Hearing 1/3/2008 2/21/2008 2 ofa Planning Agenda Report 01-01-2008 through 01-31-2008 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting _.APN# • PA07-0003 TEMECULA CEMETERY MODULAR saao2oooa UNIT KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit to install a modular office structure at the Temecula Cemetery located at 41911 C Street (APN: 944-020-004) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 1 /512007 ANN A • PA07-0309 PDO-6 Zoning Amendment s5so6ooo7 ERIC JONES A Zoning Amendment application to amend the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8). The site is generally located on Temecula Parkway approximately 325 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 11/1/2007 APN # • PA08-0004 Verizon Wireless CUP 953390002 BETSY LOWREY A Conditional Use Permit/Antenna Facility Application for Verizon Wireless to remove an existing monopine antenna tower and replace with an upgraded monopine antenna tower and co-locate additional antennas onto the new monopine antenna tower. This project is located on a 5.9 acre site owned by Rancho California Water District with two existing on-site water towers and surrounded by residential homes, generally located on the east side of Meadows Parkway approximately 1000 feet north of Rancho California Road [APN 953-390-002]. This project relates to previously processed cell tower planning applications PA04-0264 and PA05-0063. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 1 /7/2008 AYN # • PA08.0005 2008 SPRING ROD RUN 922035001 KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit for the 2008 Spring Rod Run to be held in Old Town Temecula on March 7 and 8, 2008. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Administrators Hearing 1 /9/2008 3/ 1 /2008 APN # • PA08-0024 OLD TOWN CORVETTE SHOW 922o73o2a KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit for the OId Town Corvette Show to be held in the Temecula Stampede Parking Lot, 28721 Old Town Front Street on April 13, 2008. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Administrators Hearing 1 /28/2008 3/17/2008 APN # • PA08.0027 Zarka Cigar Lounge PCN 921060032 KATIE LECOMTE A Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity Application for aType-42 license (on-sale beer and wine) for Zarka Cigar Lounge located at 28120 Jefferson Avenue; Suite 202 (APN: 921-060-032). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 1 /29/2008 3 of4 Planning Agenda Report 01-01-2008 through 01-31-2008 • PA08.0031 ROdrIg0'S RTTC AICOhoI CUP 920100036 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for a full bar (Type 47 license) at Rodrigo's Mexican Grill currently under construction in the Rancho Temecula Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 2/5/2008 Am n • PA08-0032 Promenade Macy/Gar Bridge Mod 910130072 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS A Major Modification to the West Parking Structure and Macy's Storefront at the Promenade Mall to construct a pedestrian bridge connecting from the second level of the West Parking Structure to the second level of the Macy's store. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 2/6/2008 APN # • PA08-0035 USED CAR TENT SALE s1o13oo7z KNUTE NOLAND A Used Car Tent sale located at the Promenade Mall, 40820 Winchester Road, between Macy's and Johnny Carinos. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Administrators Hearing 2/11 /2008 3/3/2008 APN # PA08-0037 Sp/ash Canyon Waterpark 910271002 CHRISTINE DAMKO A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit and EIR for a waterpark located at the northwest intersection of Ynez Road and County Center Drive. (Former application, PA06-0213) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 2/13/2008 4 of4 ITEM NC). 3d Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report -January 2008 PREPARED BY: Sue Steffen, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file On January 24, 2008 Mayor Mike Naggar traveled to San Francisco with staff for a COP Credit Presentation on the Temecula Civic Center Financing Project. Attachment: Meeting Agenda ITINERARY January 24-25, 2008 (San Francisco) COP Credit Presentation (2008 Temecula Civic Center Financing Project) THURSDAY. JANUARY 24T": 8:OOa Depart Ontario 9:20a Arrive Oakland Hotel: Take Cab to: Hyatt Regency San Francisco 5 Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 415-788-1234 10:30a Meet at Stone & Youngberg's office for a review of the Presentation and to make sure everyone knows what pages they are covering 11:30a Lunch brought in 1:15p Start Presentation 3:OOp Presentation complete 6:OOp Meet in the lobby of the Hyatt Regency to take cabs to dinner 6:30p Drinks and Dinner FRIDAY. JANUARY 25~' 10:35a Depart Oakland 11:50a Arrive Ontario ITEM NC). 31 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Economic Development Department Report for the Month of January 2008 PREPARED BY: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of January 2008. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OUTREACH MATERIALS/MEDIA Staff prepared the article for the February issue of the Temecula Valley Chamber newsletter. The article titled "TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT REMAINS STRONG IN SLOWING ECONOMY", addressed the slowdown of the economy but highlighted many exciting development projects coming up in Temecula's immediate future. The article was also submitted to The Valley Business Journal for publication. EVENTS On January 14th, staff held apre-planning meeting with event organizers of the Temecula Rod Run and representatives from Old Town merchants to discuss plans for the event. The Rod Run will be held on March 7 and 8 in Old Town Temecula. On January 21St, the San Diego Padres 2008 Winter Warm-Up was held at the Temecula Community Theater. Padre's players, coaching staff and front office executives were on hand to sign autographs, answer questions and talk about the upcoming season. Mayors from the cities of Lake Elsinore and Temecula provided the welcome. The City of Temecula exhibited at the Association of Corporate Real Estate Executives of the Inland Empire Conference which was held on January 23rd at the Ontario Convention Center. The 2008 Development Private/Public Conference: Partnering with Inland Empire Cities for Development Success attracted over 200 professionals in the industry. Approximately seven cities from San Bernardino and Riverside Counties provided economic development updates an their communities. Temecula Deputy City Manager Grant Yates spoke on economic development activities and projects occurring in Temecula. Staff also prepared handout information for distribution at the conference. Council Members and staff attended the YMCA groundbreaking at Margarita Community Park on January 30t". The YMCA will be built in three phases. The first portion of the three-phase project will consist of a 7,200-square-foot outdoor pool area and an 8,000-square-foot building space that will house an exercise room, locker rooms and administrative offices. Phase one expects to be completed early 2009. The second phase will provide a 7,200-square-foot gymnasium. The project will wrap up with the construction of a roof over the pool. Staff attended the Temecula Valley Chamber Ribbon Cutting forAltura Credit Union on January 31St. Gerry Agnes, President of Altura Credit Union, spoke and was very excited that Altura had opened an office in Temecula. Altura Credit Union serves mare than 108,000 members and has $821 million in total assets. Temecula Mayor Pro Tem Edwards, Council Members Comerchero and Roberts and staff attended the Third District Economic Development Forum on January 31St. Rabin Zimpfer, Assistant County Executive OfficerlEDA, spoke of the County's Economic Development efforts, activities and projects. Riverside County 3rd District Supervisor Jeff Stone spoke on public safety services, infrastructure, parks and recreation projects as well as the economic outlook for the future. MEETINGS On January 10t", staff met with Laurie McLaughlin, Dean of Offsite Programs at Mt. San Jacinto Community College District (MSJC). MSJC has secured 30,000 square feet (former Workforce Development Center building) in Temecula. Staff discussed possible education and training courses that are needed in the community. Staff attended the Partners in Education Committee Meeting on January 14t". The Partners in Education and Chamber Education Committee have merged. The focus is to develop a Youth Employment Expo for Temecula Valley youth ages 16 - 22. The Expo will be held on Saturday, April 12 from 9:00 am -11:30 am at the Community Recreation Center in Temecula. On January 14t", Strumpf Associates moderated a focus group of partners and stakeholders. This focus group was conducted on behalf of the Riverside County Workforce Development Board. The focus group was conducted as part of a comprehensive strategic planning process thatthe organization is engaging in between now and April 2008. On January 17t", staff met with Scott Schaufele of the Temecula Valley Unified School District regarding the Career Technology Education Summit which was held on February 12t" at the School District. Key community, educational and business leaders from the valley made presentations which included: Mayor Naggar, Assistant City Manager Aaron Adams and Community Services Director Herman Parker- City of Temecula, the Workforce Development Group, Temecula Chamber, Temecula Convention & Visitors Bureau, EDC of Southwest Riverside County, Mt. San Jacinto College, Cal State San Marcos, Riverside County Office of Education and International Trade Administration. On January 1St", staff from the City of Temecula, Temecula Chamber and Temecula Convention & Visitors Bureau met with Fred Latuperissa, US Dept. of Commerce, regarding Temecula's participation at the 2008 National District Export Council Conference in Palm Springs and well as other international trade opportunities Staff attended the Medical Device & Manufacturing Trade Show at the Anaheim Convention Center on January 29t". The City of Temecula was represented at the Riverside County EDA exhibit by the Riverside County EDA staff and Southwest California Economic Alliance. Staff was able to meet with some Temecula companies that were exhibiting and scheduled site visits. Staff will be following up on other contacts made at the show. The show is a premier educational and networking forum for medical manufacturing industry - from R & D to manufacturing through regulatory approval. Staff attended the Southwest California Economic Alliance Partners Meeting on January 30t" The Alliance is currently updating its website. The Partner's discussed upcoming trade show participation including: Corenet and Biocom which will be held in San Diego. The Alliance will be advertising and will receive advertorial in Business Expansion Journal -California issue. There was also discussion on the regional commercial broker luncheon which will be held at Falkner Winery's Pinnacle Restaurant. Bob Ady, a world renowned expert on economic development and site selection, will be the featured speaker. Staff attended a field trip to the Escondido Transit Center on January 30`". The purpose of this field trip was to better understand inter-regional transit efforts between San Diego County and Riverside County. This was particularly helpful with the future planning and operating of The Temecula Transit Center. ATTACHMENTS: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report Southwest California Economic Alliance Activities Report TE CULAi VA Y ~o~ER~BER 'iuom~c rna wnr' February 6, 2008 26190 Vnez Court Suite A, lemerula, CA 92591 P: 951.676.5090 F: 951.694.0201 wwwtememla.org info@tememla.org Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the January Monthly Activity Report as per our contract with the City of Temecula. Chamber staff assisted 3 businesses interested in relocating to Temecula. LUVATA Electrofin from Louisville, ICY will be opening a branch here in Temecula. They manufacture of HVAC/R equipment or spec systems for development and building projects. A firm from San Diego is interested in relocation to Temecula. A business relocation packet was Fed-X next morning and follow-up will be made by Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager. Pernell Inc. (Williams Funeral Home) from Pine Grove, WV was sent a business relocation packet. Chamber Activities at a glance: The Chamber has partnered with the following media firms to publicize its business programs and events to the community. • The Valley Business Journal • The Californian • 951 Magazine • KFRG Radio • The Press-Enterprise • The Valley News • KMYY/KOMT Radio Strategic Planning Update: The Chamber held it's Strategic Planning session with Carl Ribaudo of SMG Strategic Planning Group. Representatives from the City, Score, hospital, Pechanga, and other representatives were invited to be a part of the session. Business Development Resource Committee: The Chamber Spotlight winner for January was The Valley Gourmet Cafe. The Mystery Shopper winner Kitchen Fantasy and Volunteer Businesses of the Month, choseri by the Education Committee, were California Credit Union and TVUSD. The Business Success Forum was on Tuesday, January 8. The topic of discussion was Organization. This committee voted to implement two new events in 2008: a 55+ Networking Group and a Sphere of Influence Group. Sub Committees have begun meeting to define and set up the first event for each of these new ideas..: Membership & Marketing Committee: 29 businesses joined the Chamber in the month of January and 60 renewed their membership. Staff and Ambassadors attended li Ribbon Cutting events in January. They are listed below: • KCS Equestrian Center • Elite Mobile Media FedEx Kinko's Big Apple Physicians Cre 8 Yurbody Personal Training Studio T. Michaels Designs Altura Credit Union Cookie Lee Jewelry First Financial Credit Union National Institute Legal Center Green Acres Ranch The January Mixer was held on the 16~h at the University of Redlands, Temecula Campus, and attended by approximately 250 members. The Networking Breakfast was held January 23rd with an attendance of 85 members. The Membership Committee held an Ambassador training on January 22nd welcoming 12 new Ambassadors to the program. An Ambassador meeting was held on the 24~h of January with an attendance of 26 members. We had 75 members attend the Networking Luncheon on January 29`h at Kelsey's Restaurant at Pechanga. Additional welcome visits were made to new businesses by Chamber CEO, staff and Ambassadors. Southwest California Legislative Council: The Chamber and the council sent out many emails concerning ~~Remember to Vote". The SWCLC approved its' operating procedures and 2008 Policy Platform. Proposition 91 -Transportation Funding - No Position Proposition 92 -Community Colleges -Position recommended Oppose .. Proposition 93 -Limits on Legislators Terms in Office -Oppose Proposition 94, 95, 96, 97 -.Indian Gaming -Position to Support China Trip Update: The plans for the 2008 China trip are underway. Chamber staff is getting ready to send out all 291 passengers final itineraries along with their tickets, name badges and luggage tags. Passengers will board charter buses that will transport them to LAX for their flight on March 23`d and March 24d'. The nine day trip will include a business mixer, shopping and tours of both modern and ancient cities. Gala Awards Event: The 42"d Awards Gala is just around the corner. The event is set to take place on Saturday, February 23, 2008 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. We currently have 406. reservations to date. Over 60 businesses and citizen nominees will be honored at the event. The committee is finalizing the details for this year's Silent Auction. portion of the gala. This year's event will include a special fundraiser for the Chamber sponsored by La Masters of Fine Jewelry. La Masters is sponsoring a Champagne Diamond giveaway. Attendees will have the opportunity to purchase a champagne glass for $100. Each glass will be numbered and the participants will have the opportunity to win a one carat diamond valued at $6,800 donated by La Masters. The winner must be present to win and will be announced at the Gala. Partners In Education Committee: The Partners In .Education committee sub-committee will be working to organize the Employment Career Forum this year. City staff, School representatives, members and chamber staff is currently working on the program. The event will take place at the Community Recreation Center in April 2008. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distributors) Activity Report: 120 visitor guides and 300 winery brochures were given to South Coast Winery for customers 50 each, visitor guides, winery brochures & tourism maps were given to Southwest Health Auxiliary. • 30 each, visitor guides, winery brochures, tourism maps were given to RVing Women for their membership packets. 75 each, visitor guides, winery brochures, street maps, and directories, Were-given to Camp' Pendleton for their Leadership education Seminar for Military Spouses. 2 100 each visitor guides, winery brochures, street maps and directories were given to area real estate agents for prospective clients. Also, attached are the meeting minutes for the Business Development Resource, Southwest Legislative Council, and Membership committees. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (951) 676-5090 or a-mail asullivanC~temecula.oro. Thank you. Sincerely, r President/CEO cc: Mayor Mike Naggar Mayor Pro Tem Maryann Edwards Councilman Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Comerchero Shawri Nelson, City Manager Councilman Chuck Washington TVCC Board of Directors Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager Aaron Adam, Assistant City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager/CD Director Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Monthly Activity Report January 2008 Chamber Year-To-Date PHONE CALLS This Month Total TOURISM Tourism Referrals 367 367 Calendar of Events 322 322 Special Events 266 266 General Information 1,444 1,444 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,399 2,399 Relocation 267 267 Demographics 245 245 Chamber 812 812 Miscellaneous 712 712 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,036 4,435 WALK-INS Tourism 213 213 Calendar of Events 123 123 Special Events 186 186 General Information 1,256 1,256 Relocation 176 176 Demographics 191 191 Chamber 520 520 Miscellaneous 467 467 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,132 3,132 MAILINGS Tourism 1,456 1,456 Relocation 67 67 Demographics 165 165 TOTAL MAILINGS 1,688 1,688 E-MAIL Tourism 112 112 Relocation 77 77 Miscellaneous 321 321 TOTAL E-MAIL 510 510 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 16,021 16,021 GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGS E-MAIL WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS This Month Year-To-Date 4,435 3,132 1,688 510 16,021 Annual Volume Comparisons Chamber January 2007 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals Calendar of Events Special Events General Information TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 305 96 174 3,096 3,671 Chamber January 2008 367 322 266 1,444 2,399 Percentage 71% 120% 137% 37% 47% Relocation 59 267 420% Demographics 65 245 291% Chamber 855 812 100% Miscellaneous 522 712 134% TOTAL PHONE CALLS 1,501 2,036 133% WALK-INS Tourism 156 213 94% Calendar of Events 63 123 206% Special Events 123 186 128% General Information 2,096 1,256 47% Relocation 74 176 266% Demographics 68 191 253% Chamber 488 520 97% Miscellaneous 236 467 180% Visitor Center Walk-Ins TOTAL WALK-INS 3,304 3,132 81% MAILINGS Tourism 913 1,456 6% Relocation 15 67 793% Demographics 12 165 1458% TOTAL MAILINGS 940 1,688 37% E-MAIL Tourism 22 112 364% Relocation 13 77 1692% Miscellaneous 197 321 194% TOTAL E-MAIL 232 510 165% WEBSITE USER SESSIONS 6,417 16,021 274% * Chamber referrals reflect faxes, walk-ins and phone calls V,A.~~,~EY ~~~~ ~ R. ~...., ~.. CC!MMERCE wnvti rr~s war Membership Meeting Minutes Wednesday, January 9, 2007 - 8:00a.m. - 9:00a.m. Chamber Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Mission Statement: Develop programs to maintain and build a membership commensurate with the growth of the Temecula business community and simultaneous growth of the Chamber. Serve as goodwill representative and strive to enhance the value of membership encouraging ongoing dialogue between members. Committee Chair: )ackie Steed Board Liaisons: Tony Berardino Co-Chairs: David Paget Dan Brunel) Adam Ruiz Julie Ngo Committee Present: Judy Remsen, David Paget, Jackie Steed, Ross Wilson, Kate Donovan, Luanne Jobgen, Joe Dilullo, Jennifer Peterson, Jann Gentry, Lee McCollum, Sandy Rains, Tom McKenzie, Tony Berardino, Julie Ngo, Teresa Kosycarz, Adam Ruiz, Jackie Steed and David Paget. Staff Present: Kimberly Freize-Uhler, Katie Edmonds and Alice Sullivan. Minutes Committee Chair called the meeting to order at S:OOa.m. Self-introductions of the committee followed. The minutes of the previous meeting were reviewed and motioned for approval by Adam Ruiz and seconded by Lee McCollum, which carried. Miscellaneous Open Discussion by Committee: Sullivan spoke about the Pechanga Indian Gaming Agreement. She reported the Chamber supports their efforts to get propositions 94-97 passed as Pechanga has contributed to the schools and community and has been a great supporter of the Chamber. Sullivan made everyone aware there will be $9 Billion coming back to the state of California will help the funding of tribes without casinos as well as help support California as a whole. Vote on February 5ml Ngo announced the Membership Committee will be holding 4 complimentary seminars this year put on by the Small Business Development Center. It was discussed that through funding from the Chamber these seminars are free for members and non-members to attend. It was also noted these events need to be promoted by committee members and staff. It is a great benefit for the business community. Networking Breakfast. Networking Luncheon, Mixers and 5 Minute Networking: By Adam Ruiz: The Networking Breakfast is held the 4th Wednesday of the month and sponsorships are available. The benefits to being a breakfast sponsor were discussed; the company will receive recognition at the event, company logo will be placed onto the networking flyer sent out to 1400 members and signage is placed by the coffee and danishes at the event. Ruiz announced that the Chamber is looking for a location for the next Networking Luncheon which is to be held at the end of the month. It was noted it is a great benefit to the restaurant holding the event and their logo will be placed onto the flyer for added exposure. The Chamber has a budget of $10 all inclusive for the lunch and is looking for a location that will hold 75-80 guests. Possible locations for luncheon: Bailey's Front Street Bar & Grill patio or Palumbos (A new restaurant located in Old Town). The next 5 Minute Networking will be held at Jazzy Accents Restaurant on February 7t". Ruiz announced the Power Networking workshop has had great feedback and has been a very successful workshop. Sub-Committee Reports Ambassador Program: By David Paget: Paget announced the next Ambassador Training will be Tuesday, January 22nd from 9-loam and there will be a mandatory Ambassador Meeting Thursday, January 24th from 11:30am-lpm. The Ambassador contest will start this year and all details will be announced at the mandatory meeting. Paget reported the Ribbon Cuttings have had a great attendance of Ambassadors this past month. Ambassador Commitment forms for 2008 were circulated. Welcome & Retention: By Julie Ngo: Ngo reported the welcome committee is making their scheduled calls to the new members but volunteers are needed. Ngo wants to get solid commitments for 2008 from committee members to set a schedule for the year. The 4 month and the 7 month calls are being made but are very difFcult due to lack of response from members. The committee is exploring new ways to keep the members excited about their membership. They are looking into sending personal notes out in the 7"' month rather than calling. The Chamber has added and continues to add programs, events and seminars to accommodate the schedules of each individual. During the phone conversation to new members all benefits are discussed. Freize-Uhler asked all committee members and volunteers to help with renewals and new members as the budget numbers have been down this month. It was announced the Chamber will take payments on membership dues if a company cannot make a payment in full but it must be made in two payments over a two month period or three payments over a three month period. The Committee discussed a possible discount for renewals. Some of the ideas that were discussed were a discount to the company that pays the renewal fees for two or three years upfront or a sale for membership that runs for aweek/month and each member that joins within that time frame receives a certain discount. Freize-Uhler announced Chamber staff is working on an add campaign that will reiterate all member benefits in a new and exciting way. The Chamber wants to be the #1 resource for businesses and the community. Let the Chamber be your Directory! The Committee also discussed putting together a new committee to bring all new and fresh ideas together to improve the Chamber's marketing strategy. StafF is working on the •'Shop Temecula First" campaign and business card. Hospital Report: By Alice Sullivan: Sullivan reported the proposed hospital is currently in the state approval process. Once they are approved by the state they will break ground and go through city approvals. Sullivan also reported the CEO of Southwest Healthcare System is Richard Ellis. Citv of Temecula Report: By Alice Sullivan: Sullivan reported the Old Town Merchants have been very successful and positive partners to the community. She encouraged the committee to in- turn support them. Sullivan announced the Chamber is working with the City on retention calls and has gone on ten this past year. Board Report• By Tony Berardino: Berardino announced the new board of directors have been elected. Mixer By Staff: The next mixer will be January 16th at the University of Redlands, Temecula campus. Open Discussion: It was announced the China trip has been a huge success and 291 individuals are signed up to go. This has helped supplement the Chamber's income due to lack of renewals and new members. It was announced the special events committee is looking for prize donations for the Awards Gala which will be held in February. Tickets for the event are now on sale. The theme will be °Breakfast at Tiffany's." LaMasters of Fine Jewelry has donated a one carat diamond that will be given away at the event. Other Business• Gentry announced a new networking event will be taking place this coming year. With the held from committee members and staff the Chamber is looking to put together a Friday Morning Coffee networking event. The event will be held once a month around 8:OOam or 9:OOam with coffee and Danish. This will give members an opportunity to mix and mingle before heading to work. Gentry is looking for Ambassadors to help organize the events. The Business Success Form will be held February 12`h and the topic will be "How to Effectively Network in the Chamber." Networking Breakfast Coffee Sponsors and Business Spotlights are needed for 2008. Meeting adjourned: 9:03am -Thank you for your attendance. The Temecu/a Ya//ey Chamber ofCommerce is a business Organization ofa/most 1,400 members representing over25,000 emp/oyees. The Chamber works with city o~cia/s, /oca/businesses and the communityatlarge to promote the /oca/economy. SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL www.southwestcaliforniaadvocacv.biz Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce Murrieta Chamber of Commerce ]anuarv 2007 SWCLC Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes Monday, January 28, 2008 Chamber Advocacy: Jeremy Harris 2008 Chair: Greg Morrison (Present) Directors Present: Karen Wikert, Lynn Effinger, Dennis Frank, Dr. Billie Blair, Isaac Lizarraga, Amy Minniear, Roger Ziemer, Gene Wunderlich, Glen Daigle Directors Absent: Michelle Penna, Carl Johnson, Joan Sparkman, Scott Crane Members Present: Jeff Greene-Office of Kevin Jeffries, Kari Reuther-Granite Construction Margo Board-City of Temecula, Adam Evintoff-TMG Communications, Todd Nicholson-Nicholson Group, Dave Wilmon-League of California Cities John Tanner-RBF Consultants Staff Present: Alice Sullivan and Laura Turnbow -Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Kim Cousins Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce Rex Oliver -Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Meeting called to order at 12:08pm Chair's Report • Recent Press Releases: Harris reported that press releases listing the February 5, 2008 proposition positions were sent to al press contacts. • The SWCLC has acted as a co-sponsor of Assembly member Benoit's Small Business Family Scheduling Option legislation which would allow for the 4-Day work week. • Proposition lA -Deals with constitutional protections on Property, sales tax and vehicle tax monies. Morrison stated that there is discussion that these protections would be suspended. This item will be discussed in detail in February. Agenda 1. Approval of December 2007 Minutes Motion was made to approve the December 17, 2007 meeting minutes with the addition of Glen Daigle as present. The motion was seconded and carried by a unanimous vote. 2. 2008 Policy Platform -Jeremy reviewed the proposed 2008 Policy Platform. Changes to this document were discussed. The motion was made to approve the 2008 Policy Platform with changes as noted. The motion was seconded and carried by a unanimous vote. 3. Riverside BIA Building Permit Process -Discussion on this item has been postponed until the February meeting. 4. SR 241 Foothill South Toll Road -Todd Nicholson of the Nicholson Group discussed the proposed 16 mile extension of the Foothill South (241) Toll road. This extension would relieve some congestion between the Inland Empire and Orange County, primarily on the I-5. This project will go before the Coastal Commission on Wednesday, February 5, 2008. The Nicholson Group is requesting a letter supporting this project be sent to the Coastal Commission. Morrison stated that requests for input from agencies opposing this project have not been answered. The SWCLC requested clarification on the interchange details from the Ortega Hwy. to the 241. The motion was made to approve the overall project with the understanding that the Ortega Hwy. interchange can be improved. The motion was seconded and carried. One Director abstained from voting on this item. A letter supporting this project and encouraging the improvement of the 74 interchange will be drafted by Harris and forwarded to the Coastal Commission. 5. AB iX The Healthcare Security and Cost Reduction Act -Previously proposed as AB 8, AB 1X would create an expansive new health care program funded by payroll taxes and increased tobacco taxes. A motion was made to oppose AB iX as written. The motion was seconded and carried by a unanimous vote. 6. Local, State and Federal Staff Updates Assembly member Kevin Jeffries Office -Jeff Greene reported that all legislative packages will be completed this week and numbers will be assigned to proposed bills. The SWCLC transportation infrastructure bill will be carried by Assembly member Jeffries. Jeffries is also carrying a transportation bill on behalf of the RCTC that would allow for expansion of the I 15 Freeway. Term limits and eminent domain will also be issues that will be addressed this year. Meeting was adjourned at 1:15pm Next meeting will be Monday, February 25, 2008 at the Temecula Chamber of Commerce, 26790 Ynez Court, Temecula, CA The Southwest California Legislative council thanks our oartners: Southwest Riverside Country Association of Realtors Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury Metropolitan Water District Near-Cal Corporation Economic Development Corp. of Southwest California Elsinore Valley Municipal Water Dist. The Gas Company Abbott Vascular The Murrieta Temecula Group Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Arrowhead Credit Union Temecula Valley Bank Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Retail Development Advisors Corp. Lake Elsinore Valley Chamber of Commerce TE1~t-ECULA.f y~~~`~Y C:IV'1B ER ~-`' " ()"~ COMMERCE °LEADfNG THE WAY° Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Special Events Committee Update ]anuary 2008 42nd Annual Awards Gala The 42"d Annual Awards Gala is in full swing. Community Little Book is the event Title Sponsor along with Pechanga Resort & Casino. The invitations have been mailed out to the entire membership. Reservations have already been received. Currently we have 350 reservations to date. La Masters of Fine Jewelry has agreed to donate a one carat diamond valued at $6,800. The diamond will part of a fundraiser at this year's Awards Gala. Attendees will have the opportunity to purchase a numbered Champagne glass. Only 200 glasses will be available for purchase. During the gala a number will be drawn and the person with that numbered Champagne glass will be the winner of the diamond. The winner must be present to win. Glasses are available for purchase now at a pre-sale price of $90 a glass on the Chambers website. Staff will email the volunteer schedule to all of the Chamber Ambassadors to help at this year's gala. The deadline for Silent Auction prizes is February lit. Baskets and Balloons Too has agreed to wrap all of the silent auction packages again this year. The packages need to be delivered to her no later than February 19d'. 2008 State of the City Address The plans for the 2008 State of the City are underway. Mike Naggar has selected "Winning Championships" as his theme for this year. The committee has selected brown and turquoise as the color theme for the invitations and table decorations. The city will be working with Alan Cook and Group 1 Productions to produce this year's Mayor's presentation. The next committee meeting will be Thursday, February 7d' at 8:00 a.m. TE~CULA.--~~ ~~~~y. 'LFAplNG?Hf WAY° Business Development Resource Committee MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, December 19, @ S:OOam TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Committee Chair: Ginny Mulhern (present) Co-Chair: Barak Berlin (present) Board Liaison: Bill Seltzer (not present) & Karen Roberts (not present) Members Present: Paul Dessert, Jann Gentry, Estella Cline, Devon Johnson, Sam Kleinschmidt, Adam Pflaumer, Chad Hensley, Michelle Deskin, Laura Bruno, Judy Remsen, Marvin Gabut Staff Present: Emily Pulley, Katie Edmonds, Alice Sullivan A~nroval of Minutes December minutes approved November minute approved Member Recognition Program for January Volunteer-Special Events Iris Hooper Idearc Media Corp Mystery California Handyman Tanya Rogers Teresa Machado-Dancy Kecklnsurance Spotlight Private Investigations Investigative Business Solutions Brent Lajeunesse Business Success Forum • January 8 topic was Organization • February 12 event will be a presentation by Laura Bruno, How to effectively network in the Chamber. Bruno said it will be a great meeting with lots of great information. Partners in Learnino • Berlin explained the program to the new committee members. • Hensley invited everyone to the January 29, 3pm meeting at the library to discuss the program and the mixer that will be held at the library in April. • Gentry asked if Barnes & Noble had been approached. Hensley stated they had, but they wanted to donate a % rather than books. Also, they are not Chamber members. • Pflaumer asked if books were also accepted. Hensley said yes, but not through this program. Book donation can be made directly to the Friends of the Temecula Library will either be put in the library after a review process or sold in the Friend's store. • Hensley reminded every that the library is a GREAT business resource and library cards are free. Over 1000 people at day visit the new library. Committee Update New ideas for the Committee were discussed. • Seniors Networking group o Sullivan mentioned inviting all the China trip travelers to the first event. o Asub-committee is being formed to shape the idea. The first sub-committee meeting will be at the Chamber office, Wednesday, ]anuarv 30 at Sam. All are welcome to attend. • Sphere of Influence group o Pulley explained it would be networking opportunity for specific categories. For example... invite all business that would be involved with a wedding to come to an open house at the chamber. They can network with themselves and with anyone else who is looking for those kind of services. Asub-committee is being formed to shape the idea. The first sub-committee meeting will be at the Chamber off, Wednesday )anuarv 30 at gam. All are welcome to attend. City/Hospital report o Berlin mentioned the reports that are given at the Membership committee meetings and how it adds value to the meeting. He would like to see that implemented into the Business Development Resource Committee Meeting. o Sullivan reported that she was working with a city and hospital person to come report. And also Jeff Kurtz, General Manager, Promenade In Temecula, and new TVCC Board member has already agreed to give reports to the committee about the mall construction. o Deskin suggested the City report include community events calendar also. Remsen informed the group about a Healthcare Symposium she has been talking with the Chamber about implementing. Sullivan report that this event will be coordinated by the Special Events department and be in the fall of 2008. Board Update 1. Yes on Propositions 94.95. 96. & 97 2. New Executive Board Election Update 3. Strategic Plan Update 4. Career Technical Education Summit 5. Tonight, Networking Mixer, University of Redlands, Temecula Campus. 5:30-7:30pm 6. Chamber office closed, Monday Jan 21 7. Wed, Jan 23, Networking Breakfast, 7:30-gam, BJ's Restaurant 8. Tues, Feb 5, Power Networking Workshop, 12-1:30pm 9. Thurs, Feb 7, 5 Minute Networking, Jazzy Accents, 10. Tues, Feb 12, Business Success Forum, 11:30-1:30pm, How to Effectively Network in the Chamber Adjournment Thank you for attending! NEXT MEETING: Wednesday, February 20, at 8:OOam Location: TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book SiOUTH~`` 4 a3is~ ,y., )~J/ )_ J -~ ~. LL•~ViFJ ~~~~'Yf9 ~:,i. [((Enka Elsinore Murriete Trmecula ~c'` ~ County of YLivexaide TO: Sarah Mundy Deputy Director Riverside County EDA Ron Bradley City Manager City of Murrieta FROM: Stevie Field Executive Director DATE:. January 11, 2008 Aaron Adams Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Cathy Barrozo Analyst City of Lake Elsinore SUBJECT: 50UTHWEST CALIFORNIA MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest California Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Leads During November and December we had eight leads. These leads were generated from our ads in Business Facilities magazine and Site Selection magazine. Web-site/GIS 2007 yielded 106,103 visitors to our website. The web-site update has taken a little longer than expected as we are still gathering data. Some of the data needed was not "apples to apples" in that some was from 4fh qtr 2007 and some was from 3rd qtr 20D7. We are working diligently on this and should have it completed soon. We will also in the process of updating our GIS application. Mario Ubalde of GIS Planning attended our November meeting and provided a tutorial of the GIS as well as some of the new applications available. Our contract includes to following updates: Maps -new, better quality maps. City boundaries will be better defined as will the zooming capability; Drive time -users will be able to search within a "drive time radius". Currently this is available to 20 miles however, it will be extended to 50 miles and 50 minutes; Demographics -this will include five (5) year projects. MOU 1 am pleased to announce that the MOU between the County of Riverside and the Economic Alliance as it pertains to reimbursement for staff was approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 8d'. Broker Luncheon I am pleased to report that our Regional Broker Luncheon will be held on Thursday, February 28"', 11:30 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. at the Faulkner Winery, Pinnacle Restaurant. Our guest speaker will be Bob Ady of Ady International. Mr. Ady is a world renowned expert on economic development and site selection. He has identified optimal locations for many corporations in the US and helped define the methodology used as standards today in the site selection process. There will be a special opportunity for Alliance Partners and Councilmember's on Wednesday, February 271h from 5:30 - 7:30 p. m. The Alliance will host a special private reception for Mr. Ady at the Temecula Creek Inn, which will provide the opportunity to get to know Mr. Ady, educate him on your respective community and ask him questions. More information about these events will be provided at the Alliance meeting on January 30~h Newsletters I am currently working with Cutting Edge Marketing on the three newsletters. Two are industry specific to include one on Biotech (biomed, pharmaceuticals & R&D included), and the other on clean-industry manufacturing. The third newsletter will be more general but will highlight the HUB Zone, Brine line, Foreign Trade Zone, the Alliance etc. The writer for the newsletter articles is currently conducting interviews now and will provide me the final draft for approval. We will include the latest news and legislation to affect the industry, how our area can provide a good location for those in the industry, regional company interviews, workforce, etc. Ad Camaaian A few months ago we discussed a new Alliance ad campaign. IN order to be competitive in various marketing projects, we need to update our look. This ad campaign will be a series of ads (three or four) that will all have the same message but be industry specific; highlighting some of the companies we already have located in our region. I will have ad concepts available at the January meeting for comment and discussion. Virtual Job Fair/Job Database As many companies are experiencing hiring freezes or lay-offs we have put the Virtual Job Fair on a temporary hold. At the January meeting we will discuss whether to open up the Job Fair for (as a suggestion) $50 - $100 per booth and keep it open indefinitely or to open it up on once every few months. Trade shows/conferences On behalf of the Alliance, (have/will be attending the following trade shows/conferences: Medical Design & Manufacturing (MD&M) West January 29-31 Anaheim, CA International Council of Economic Development (IEDC) February 2-5 Orlando, FL If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 952.696.1578. Sincerely, Stevie Field Executive Director Copy: Gloria Wolnick Veme Lauritzen ITEM NC). 32 Approvals ~ City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jerry Williams, Chief of Police DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of January 2008. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service ................................................................................................. 7,430 "Priority One" calls for service ....................................................................................................... 52 Average response time for "Priority One" calls ...............................................................3.9 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours ................................................................................................... 451 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours ....................................................................................... 205 Reserve officer hours (patrol) ....................................................................................................... 20 Total Volunteer hours ................................................................................................................ 1172 CRIME PREVENTION/GRAFFITI Crime prevention workshops conducted ................................................ ........................................ 1 Residential/business security surveys conducted .................................. ........................................ 1 Businesses visited .................................................................................. ........................................ 2 Businesses visited for past crime follow-up ............................................ ........................................ 9 Crime prevention articles ........................................................................ ........................................ 1 Total square footage of graffiti removed ................................................. ................................. 8,779 Number of Graffiti Locations ........................................................ ................................ 46 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served ............................................................................................................... 260 Sets of fingerprints taken .............................................................................................................. 44 Police reports filed ........................................................................................................................ 27 Citations signed off ....................................................................................................................... 27 Total receipts ..................................................................................................................... $5,445.00 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM (SET TEAM) On sight felony arrests ......................................... On sight misdemeanor arrests ............................. Felony arrest warrants served ............................. Misdemeanar arrest warrants served .................. Follow-up investigations ....................................... TRAFFIC ......................................................................... 4 ......................................................................... 5 ......................................................................... 3 ......................................................................... 4 ...................................................................... 16 Citations issued for hazardous violations ................................................... ................................ 990 D.U.I. checkpoints conducted ..................................................................... .................................... 1 D.U.I. Arrest .................................................................................... ..............................40 Non-hazardous citations ............................................................................. ................................ 353 Stop Light Abuse Program {S.L.A.P.} citations ........................................... ................................ 139 Neighborhood Enforcement Team {N.E.T.} citations ................................. .................................. 25 Parking citations .......................................................................................... ................................ 463 Seatbelts .................................................................................... ..............................41 School Zones .............................................................................. ..............................95 Injury collisions ............................................................................................ .................................. 17 Presentations .............................................................................. ...............................0 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload ............................................................................. ....................................... 218 Total Cases Assigned ......................................................................... ......................................... 59 Total Cases Closed ............................................ ...................................58 Number of community seminars conducted ........................................ ........................................... 6 Presentations ........................................................................ .....................................0 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls far service .................... Felony arrest/filings .............. Misdemeanar arrest/filings... Vehicle burglaries ................ Vehicle thefts ........................ Total receipts ........................ SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests .................................................................... ............................................................. 3 Misdemeanar arrests ......................................................... ........................................................... 12 Citations ............................................................................. ........................................................... 42 Youth counseled ................................................................ ....................................................... 213 Presentations .......................................................... ..................................................2 Drug Alcohol Awareness Grades 9 Anti-Bulling Drug Awareness YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM Orientations delivered to new program members .......................................................................... 0 School visits .................................................................................................................................. 48 Home visits .................................................................................................................................... 18 Presentations .............................................................................................................0 Truancy Sweep ............................................................................................................0 ITEM NC). 33 Approvals ~Q City Attorney s~~~ Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mark Harold, Director of Building and Safety DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Departmental Report -January 2008 The following is an overview of permit and inspection activity for January 2008. Single Family Development -Tracts In January, the City issued 9 new single family tract home permits. The homes are primarily in Wolf Creek which has 96 homes under construction. Harveston has 50 homes under construction at this time. There are a total of 235 single family homes under construction throughout the City. Custom Single Family Homes As of January, we have a total of 14 custom homes under construction. Multi-Family Development In January there were 70 condominiums permits issued for Temecula Lane, and 13 condominiums under construction in the Harveston Savannah Development. Commercial Development There were 2 new commercial permits issued in January. In addition, there was a plan check activity submitted for the new Civic Center Parking Structure located at 28690 Mercedes Street. Total Permit and Inspection Activity During the month of January inspection staff performed 3,191 inspections and 133 permits were issued representing a construction valuation of $22,451,371.51. The total building permit and plan check fees collected in the month of January were $232,485.27. ITEM NC). 34 Approvals ~Q City Attorney Sv Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: February 26, 2008 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the attached Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Reports for the month of January, 2008. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report January /February 2008 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: February 26, 2008. PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. Fire Station -Northeast Site (Roripaugh Ranch) This project will construct a new fire station in the north part of the City. The majority of work was completed by April of 2006. Roripaugh Developer (Ashby) schedule shows access and utilities to the site in August 2007. Because of this there was cost to re-mobilize and complete the project when the aforementioned items are complete, these costs are reflected in an approved change order total, which is the responsibility of the developer. In addition, a fire engine/truck venting system (requested/added on 2/06) will be installed when the Contractor is re-mobilized; this cost is also included in the approved change order total. 2. Temecula Education Center- Rough Grading This project will provide for the grading of the proposed Temecula Education Center. Project was awarded on 4/11/06. Construction started on 5/1/06. CCO#1 to relocate/modify all impacted utilities along Diaz Road adjacent to the project was approved by the RDA Board on 10/10/06 and Diaz Road was brought up to grade. All work was completed on March 28, 2007. Other ongoing work under this contract involves EMWD work outside of the project limit which was completed in late July. The property was prepared for the rainy season and we are in the process of resolving all issues with EMWD. 3. City Field Operations Center (Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard) -Phase 2 This projectwill construct the second phase of the City's Field Operation Center, which includes the building and the corporate yard. Most punch list work is complete. The City, consultant and contractor are working to resolve the stem wall to curtain wall connection leak that happened during the last major storms. 4. Fire Station -Wolf Creek Site A new 3-bay, 9,062 SF, heavy urban fire station will be built at the SE corner of Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek Dr South. City council's accepted the project at the 02/12/08 City Council Meeting. Warranty issues have come up and the Contractor is working on them. There's a potential claim that may surface (U/G electrical conduits vs. overhead placement). 5. Diaz Road Realignment to Vincent Moraga Underthis project, Diaz Road will be realigned starting just south of Rancho Wayto Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. The traffic signal at existing Diaz Road and Rancho California Road will be removed. With the exception of applying bonded fiber matrix as apost-construction erosion control measure, anticipated to be done the week of 2/18/08, the project is complete. Landscape maintenance period terminated on February 9, 2008. Notice of Completion is to be filed in March. 6. Rancho California Road Widening, Old Town Front Street to 1-15 (Southside) This project will construct an additional eastbound lane to provide for a rightturn lane to southbound -15, as well as modify the existing median to accommodate dual left turn lanes from westbound Rancho California Road to southbound Old Town Front Street. AT&T has removed the excess encasement of their facilities to allow the construction of the missing storm drain. This allowed the City to complete the storm drain construction. All work items should be completed by the end of February. 7. I-15 and 79 South Sign Replacement -Temecula Parkway Name Addition and Replacement of 79South Signs Within City Limits This project will add the newly adopted name of "Temecula Parkway" to the appropriate freeway signs and change all "79 South" signs within City Limits. All installations have been completed. Project acceptance by the City Council is scheduled for the March 18th meeting. 8. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Emergency Channel Grading Rainfall on 12/01/07 prompted the City Council to declare a Local Emergency on 12/11/07 due to an unforeseen flood condition at the CRC. P/W Staff negotiated with TCSD's Annual Agreement Contractor to complete the grading work; construction was completed on 12/13/07. Staff received advanced authorization from USACE and is currently seeking after-the fact authorization from CDFG. Mitigation may be required for the impacts to the channel; discussions with regulatory agencies on this matter continue. 9. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail This project will build equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Diaz Road. The project is funded in part by a $1,214,000 federal grant. Riverside County Flood Control has issued the'Encroachment Permit. The City is working with the consultantto revise the irrigation plans and process them through RCWD. Eastern Municipal Water District's Force Main project has just been completed. Once the irrigation plans are approved by RCWD construction can commence. Construction should begin by the end of March. 10. Traffic Signal Installation -Rancho California Road at Business Park West Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Rancho California Road at Business Park West. Apre-construction meeting was held on 11/15/07. The City received delivery of the poles and the controller. All concrete ramps work is complete. All signal poles have been erected. The contractor is working on pulling all the wires. Southern California Edison (SCE) is to provide power. on 02/16/08. The signal is scheduled to be turned on on 02/20/08. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Old Town Infrastructure Projects -Street Improvements, Mercedes St (2nd - 6th) & the Realignment of Main St. and Construction of the Town Square This project includes street improvements on Mercedes & Main Streets. For bidding purposes, this work and the Town Square improvements were merged. The Town Square construction include the plaza area for Phase 1 of the Civic Center. One contractor will be responsible forthe entire project. This project is currently being advertised for construction bids. Bid opening is scheduled for February 28, 2008. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 2. Pechanga Parkway Improvements -Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The Environmental Document (Categorical Exclusion) was approved by FHWA on April 19, 2007. The PS&E package & request for authorization (RFA) was re-submitted to Caltrans on 11/1/07. Caltrans provided comments to the City and the City responded to these comments and resubmitted the package. Caltrans has reviewed and approved the RFA package. It has been forwarded to Caltrans HO for issuance of the construction authorization. Also, we are working with our landscape consultant to modify the irrigation plans to accommodate recycled water due to newly, adopted State laws and RCWD regulations. Once the City receives a letter of authorization for construction (E-76) from Caltrans, the public bidding process can be initiated for construction. 3. Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements -Environmental Mitigation The project includes the construction of new wetlands as part of the Wolf Valley Creek Channel - Stage (Project. The mitigation site is located along the north bank of Temecula Creek (within the floodplain and floodway area). The environmental regulatory agencies have approved this new mitigation area and would not have accepted the 5-year maintenance on the Pala Road Bridge mitigation site unless this new mitigation project was provided by the Gity. New landscaping and an irrigation system will be installed. Once the mitigation area is constructed, the City will perform a 5- yearmaintenance and monitoring plan. RCFC & WCD stated that the proposed mitigation site is not within their maintenance area and they have no significant comments regarding the installation. The consultant provided signed mylars to the City for signature. The contract bid document and technical specifications are be finalized. The appraisal for three easements is now complete and offers for purchase of the property will be made to owners during the month of February. 4. Murrieta Creek Bridge -Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road This project includes studying alignments, design and construction of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, including a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. Coordination with RCFC &WCD and the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers is required. The Corps has completed their HEC-RAS Study for Murrieta Creek. The access ramps to the creek and under crossings at bridges are now included in the HEC-RAS cross-sectional data. The consultant is reviewing the HEC-RAS Studyand they should finish their review by February 15th. According to RCFC &WCD, the Corps will not provide a guarantee that this is the last study, however, the new HEC- RAS study now provides 4 feet of freeboard for the proposed bridge (1' more than is needed for the Corps and RCFC & WCD criteria). The reason for the increase in freeboard was due to a reduction of the roughness coefficient along the sides of the Murrieta Creek Channel; the roughness coefficient was reduced from .09 to about .05. 5. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement) This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Design consultant Simon Worig Engineering (SWE) and the City are continuing to pursue environmental permitting and coordination issues associated with pursuing the bridge replacement as a project separate from the Corps of Engineer's Murrieta Creek improvement project. Riverside County Flood Control has provided data from the Corps regarding creek delineation, from which EDAW (environmental subconsultant) is determining their scope of work. EDAW's field work is to begin in March '08. EDAW has also determined that this project mayqualifyfor a 404(r) exemption, which would shorten the environmental process somewhat. Further information on this development is forthcoming. 6. Diaz Road Extension to Cherry Street This project is "On-hold"' as it is some what dependent on the final state of the Education Center property. 7. Santa Gertrudis Bicycle/ Trail Undercrossing at Margarita Road This project will construct a trail for bicycles and pedestrians along Santa Gertrudis Creek under Margarita Road. Data regarding existing utilities are being incorporated into the design. RCFC has provided an Encroachment Permit. This project cannot be constructed until adequate funds are identified. An application was submitted for State Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds on 12/1/06. Plans & Specs will be soon and the project will be shelved until funding is identified and appropriated. 8. Western Bypass Corridor- Alignment Study This project will complete an alignment study for the northern portion of the Western Bypass Corridor (from Cherry Street to just south of Rancho California Road The City has provided comments to the Consultant, URS, on the final plans. URS has submitted their Draft Final Report. This report is currently being reviewed by the City. 9. Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis Creek This project includes the construction of an approx. 200' ped/bike bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek near Chaparral H.S. This is a federally funded project, which will involve a NEPA document. Coordination between the City and Rancho California Water District to acquire a portion of an RCWD-owned parcel needed to construct the bridge continues. Design consultant, Nolte Associates, completed preliminary surveying as it relates to bridge design in February; geotech work to begin by the end of February. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form is to be submitted tb Caltrans within the next month. Coordination with RCWD to obtain aRight-of-Entry permit to perform foundation investigation expected to be complete the week of 2/18/08. 10. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal & Desiltation Pond This project includes restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and the requirement of RWQCB by desilting the channel & pond located near the Sports Park. City's environmental consultant, BonTerra, continues to work on the environmental clearance process; regulatory permit applications were submitted on 12/13/07. Civil design was initiated utilizing the Annual Agreement consultant. Staff is reviewing 90% submittal. Possible mitigation requirements by regulatory agencies have prompted adown-sized construction scope of work. Exact impacts on the environmental and design processes have yet to be determined. 11. Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek This project involves the design and construction of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the westerly terminus of SR-79S and an extension of Pujol Street to the new structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly connection of the Western Bypass Corridor. This project has been on hold, but is now being restarted. 12. Temecula Community Center Expansion This project will add approximately 4000 square feet of space to the existing Temecula Community Center to accommodate more human services programs. The Escallier House and Barn will be moved onto the Community Center site. The Grading phase of this project is scheduled to go to bid on 2/25/08 and the bid date is set for 3/18/08. The plans and specs will go before the City Council on 2/12/08. The WOMP is still being reviewed but has been accepted in concept. The Community Center Building plans have been reviewed and approved by Building and Safety and the Fire corrections are being finalized. An Amendment is scheduled to go to Council on 2/26/08 for Meyer and Assoc. in the amount of $45,740.00. This is the cost of the design for the Escallier House and Barn. 13. Redhawk Park Improvements, Four Sites This project will add amenities to four park sites in the recently annexed Redhawk area. Due to budgetary restraints, the construction was divided into phases over a number of years. At the December 11, 2007 meeting, the City Council approved an agreementwith RJM forthe construction drawings of the chosen amenities, which include a half court basketball court, ADA accessible parking, and dog park at Redhawk Community Park; a seatwall and shade structure at Sunset Park. A kick off meeting with the design consultant was held on 02/05/08. The preparation of the construction drawings is underway. 14.OId Town Infrastructure Projects -Site Demolition and Site Preparation This project involves demolishing the existing non-historic structures on the City owned parcels at the intersection Main and Mercedes to make way forthe Main Street Realignment and the Old Town Parking Structure. The remaining relocations to occur under this contract are the Escallier House and Barn, which are scheduled to be relocated March 2008. 15.OId Town Infrastructure Projects -Underground Utility District This project will effectively underground all overhead utility lines along Old Town Front Street, between 2"d and 6'h streets, all of Main Street east of Murrieta Creek and Mercedes Street between .2nd and 6`" streets. SCE along with Verizon and Time Warner are finalizing their design/ participation of the U/G Utility District. Street improvement plans have been forwarded to the utilities. The project will be bid out in 2 parts -Rule 20A (Edison's portion) and 20B (City's portion). U/G utility construction is being closely coordinated with the street improvement project and is anticipated in April/ May 2008. 16.OId Town Infrastructure Projects -Parking Structure & Office/Retail frontage This project will construct a parking structure, including office and retail frontage as part of phase 1 of Old Town Civic Center project. NMR submitted construction documents in Jan 2008. Clarification on the retaining wall is necessary before we submit to Caltrans for the encroachment permit applications. 17. Old Town Civic Center Phase 2 Under this project the design and construction documents for phase two of the Civic Center Project will be developed. Design consultant NMR continues the schematic design process. NMR is finalizing the departmental floor plans and exterior elevations. 18. Temecula Parkway (formerly 79 South) Park & Ride This project will design and construct a park and ride facility on Temecula Parkway (formerly 79 South) at La Paz. The Park and Ride 30% design has been approved and design work continues. An amendment has been requested by AAE, Inc. for changes in design and added work for the WOMP. This will also reflect added costs to phase the project. The new design utilizes retention basins for run off instead of underground storage. Although 30 parking spaces will be lost, significant savings will be realized with this design. 19. De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (from Jedediah Smith to Margarita) This project includes rehabilitating De Portola Road from Jedediah Smith Road to Margarita Road. This is a federally funded project. The Environmental Document (Categorical Exclusion) was approved by Caltrans on August 8, 2007. The Consultant will be submitting 70% plans for review in February 2008. 20.79 South to Pechanga Parkway -Dual Right Turn Lanes This project includes the design and construction of two right turn lanes on eastbound Temecula Parkway (formerly State Route 79 South) to southbound Pechanga Parkway. The design includes the widening of Temecula Parkway and relocation of traffic signal poles. 100% design plans are almost complete; and signed mylars will be submitted to the City when a small retaining wall design is complete. The retaining wall will support the relocated sidewalk at the beginning of the proposed right turn lanes on Temecula Parkway. 21. Santiago Detention Basin This project includes the design of a 1 acre desilting basin. The proposed basin is located on the south side of Santiago Road between Vallejo Avenue and Orsmby Road. The geotechnical study has been completed and submittal of the 50% design plans is expected by 2/25/2008. 22. Pavement Rehabilitation - STPL Project This project will rehab Rancho California Road from Ynez Rd. to the City limits on the east. Consultant has submitted the 30% design package to the City for review. Comments were forwarded back to them. Consultant will submit the 90% design to the City in late-February. City submitted the PES, NES (MI) and ISA package to Caltrans for review and just received the signed PES form and the CE 23. Winchester Road/79-North Corridor Beautification This federallyfunded project will design and construct landscaping and irrigation enhancements to the existing raised medians along Winchester Road between Ynez Road and the easterly City limit. The consultant just submitted the 90% design package to the City for review. City will forward the comments back to the consultant by late February. The City received the signed PES and CE from Caltrans. 24. French Valley Parkway Phase 1 -Southbound Off-Ramp to Jefferson, Auxiliary Lane, and Widening the Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester Southbound Off-ramp A southbound of-Ramp to Jefferson, an auxiliary lane, and widening the bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester southbound off-ramp are the components of Phase 1. The City and Caltrans have agreed that immediate action is required to relieve congestion at the Winchester Road southbound off-ramp. Status is as follows: - PS&E -Consultant is preparing 95% plans (retaining walls and landscape/irrigation). - Type Selection for Retaining Walls -Approved November 2007. - Right of Way- Establishing limits of dedication. Discussions are continuing with owners of affected parcels within Phase 1 work. - Construction Cooperative Agreement -Caltrans comments received on 2nd fact sheet submittal; City is preparing additional information requested. - Maintenance Agreement -City preparing exhibit for the first draft. - Declaration of Units -Caltrans Approved Metric Exception for this phase. - Utilities -Amendment #8, for utility support, approved by City Council on 12/11/07. Staff met with the consultant on 01/10/08 to initiate work as specified in the Amendment. - Conceptual Landscape/Aesthetics - 1 st submittal to Caltrans returned with comments IBC selected 1 of the 3 conceptual options for Phase 1 on 01/22/08. This selection will be incorporated into Draft Structures PS&E submittal expected 02/13/08. 25.OId Town Gymnasium This project will construct a gymnasium in old town, adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club. The Boys and Girls Club site is too small for the proposed Gymnasium. We are currently working with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) to acquire a property adjacent the Boy's and Girl's Club for the new gymnasium. We have received several design options from WLC and will propose them to RCFC. All design work is pending the acquisition of this land. 26. Re-Stripe Route 79 South to B lanes from I-15 to Pechanga Parkway This project will provide four lanes in each direction on Temecula Parkway (formerly State Route 79 South) from I-15 to Pechanga Parkway. City is reviewing 90% design plans. Construction will be coordinated with the following project: Pechanga Parkway Dual Right Turn Lanes from Temecula Parkway, Project No. PW06-11. 27. Pavement Management System Update 2008-2013 This project will update the City's Pavement Management System forthe years 2008-2013. An RFP was forwarded to six consultants for review. City has received 3 proposals from consulting firms. Staff reviewed the proposals and is negotiating with one of them. Staff is in the process of reviewing the proposals. The most qualified consultant will be selected towards the end of January 2008. 28. Localized Storm Drain Improvements This project will fix the drainage problem at the south end of Front Street (at the MWD easement). Baseline right of way, utilities, and mapping are established. This project is currently on hold. 29. Long Canyon Detention Basin -Access Road This project will construct an access road to the Long Canyon Detention Basin. Plans and specifications are 90% complete. City is seeking FEMA funds to remove excess silt deposited within the basin before constructing the access road. Project is on hold until FEMAdetermination is finalized. PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE 11. I-15/ SR 79 South Interchange -Project Report (PR) This project will modify the I-15/ SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic. This is the next step of project development after the completion of the Project Study Report. City continued development of design geometrics and environmental technical studies. Status is as follows: - Draft Project Report -Approved January 2008. - Advisory Design Exceptions -Approved 10/18/06. - Mandatory Design Exceptions -Approved 10/20/06. - Stormwater Data Report - 4th submittal is to coincide with final PR Submittal. - Traffic Study -Approved 09/11/06. - Modified Access Report- FHWA Determination of Acceptability wasapproved in Ju1y2007. Final approval pending approval of the Final Environmental Document. - Geometric Approval Drawings -Under development. - Initial Study Assessment -Approved September 2005. - Acoustic Evaluation -Approved December 2005. - Air Quality Assessment -Approved PM10 Nov 2005 and PM2.5 Jul 2006. - Nat Environmental Study -Approved May 2006. - Cultural Studies -Approved November 2006. - Draft Environmental Document -Approved Dec 2007. Public circulation planned for March 2008. - FHWA Air Conformity - t st submittal is under Caltrans review. 12. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation This project will construct an interchange between W inchester Road Interchange and the I-15/I-215 split. The project is moving through the Caltrans process. Current status is as follows: - Draft Project Report -Approved June 2006. - Project Report -Final preparation pending approval of Environmental Document. - Draft Environmental Document -Final submittal pending approval of Storm Drain Study. - New Connection Report -Preparing final submittal for Caltrans review. - Traffic Operations Analysis -Approved 02/05/08. - Exception to 20-yr Traffic Design -Approved 12/17/07. - Stormwater Data Report -Preparing final report. - Mandatory Design Exceptions -Approved 07/18/06. - Advisory Design Exceptions -Approved 07/18/06. - Exception to Ramp Metering Policy -Approved 07/05/06. - Geometric Approval Drawings -Approved 07/18/06. - Revised Geometric Approval Drawings -Under Caltrans review. - Storm Drain Study -Revising per Caltrans comments. - Freeway Agreements -Under Caltrans-HO review. - .Risk Management Plan -Updating as necessary. - Project Charter - 1 st draft is under Caltrans review. - Declaration of Units -Request for Metric Exception denied by Caltrans. - Maintenance Agmt -Preparing 1 st submittal for Caltrans review. - Financial Plan -Preparing 2nd submittal for Caltrans review. 9 N N `L b o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m N m w m 0 w ~f :~~~'~: ~~' ' ' ' ' ' !-..;:::;:;:;:: : :~:~:~ W {O N V `+ O q O W O : : CC.. .... (j m .yr~~ 4 V T- m wID ~ °i O OOT~ p, 0 0 ~ w DOOM "O O O y ~ J J 00(n<T O O 1 C -" J J ~ N DOOTO "O O O w n ~< "O viw p~ N J O w n J Dom]] "O D - ~ C 2 O T' J ° N_ ^ , n y O N < N N 7J ~ NW D G N , J J ~ N N r T ' ^ J ~ O E N ~ ° < O •c N .. 0 ' ~' '~ "' w J-.< n (n C n N g m ,p, ° o O V °' n g N w o sm m ,n„ n m °- j °~ i a o c oN w ~ W c ~ m- ~A ' ..i~.:7T.~: .~.~.~: Zm =.o ~ m m . D D ? ~p D° o oo N< c ~ 31 : o ° N 3 0 N 'Q F»~o o N m o mm C o JJ :3 ~C m o ~O$ w~{a O ~ N 3 .y ~}~ y :' ^ ~ D fA ~ - J ~ ~ 3 . N J ~ .°.. m <o C~ C G 'm ~ o J C O °i m 3 m d N n v~+ y J n m o° ~ /., Q; /~. A'.'.'.'. :': :~: ~:fv'.~:~y.... 5 5o:q -. ~ VN3 JJ Otno3 w~5° 09'OwJ ¢`~~ ^?i : Z : ':H `Z ': J °~ V A N O N °' N ~N 0 (T n C7N Q m =w d J ~C) p Q n N I ^ . ~.;. ~A ~ N N W V s C n ~^_ m N F t O i O N {~ ~° w N N (n V/. j :'' ~ W ~ ~` J N C O) w m S G J N ~ ~~ (/1 T Y N -O ~ ~T (A N O w J o n O (p n 3 J S d w~ ^ f - ~ 11. 'i1 I / y :'iC ~ ': JJ d d ~' N j W Ut n. N O ~ ~ . ~ O y i T. dJ N '~ . 9 N ~ 7 / ~ `. ~ •: ~ N ~ 3 9 ~ v~ ~ .. ~ ~ / l O S °1 m w J C N fem . , / ' Ul 'I ' O w N ~ 'C/ f0 d C <lN n y ~ O ~ j OVI W . ~ . ... .. ~ .;.y3 ~ ~'': O ~ ~ A m 3 ~ 3 cn N W T w - f N ~ ~:'A ' .~ :~~ ~ N ~ O. W n n A n o N w w °1 J d' d (T J t 0 A W O ~ e9 ~:: '. ': ~ ~ O J m Q ~ O :. :: . . .';'r7:. 0 i 03 ~ f A ~ amJ o ;+n N t a w o m ~ s ~ O ~ O ~ O ':6] ' ~ m o W< N w o m m~ m~ m~ P ~ :: :: a ^,~?o a n m w o N N C. o. 6$ as . ;~ . ::~a 1. t+1.... >: 2 m e s m m m m :.:.Iij:. ~:~:~:~:~:~ -~ o oc°fc ~ n :. . ,5 :":: ~ O 0] O p O t0 3 O C ~\o (O N ~ 3 a O\ ~ O 4 j v e v o i 0 v° f j o ( x O~ o . j V° : ro P'7 d ~ ~ O , n': ~f ~. F 1F7 m ~ m ..a!],.(a ..~....~. m V o ~ e ~~ w y C N o o e ~ ~ a om. o. ~ d,, n m N y O° 3° °c 5 3 ' w w 3 ~ y.N vs o n o m m o y m n~ N~ ti d d< y ~'m ^ J F s c 3 0 ~ d i n S_ m n - 5 N ~ m o ,.. - . rn ~ m ~ O m .~ v y J N N m m n m or c 3 m ~ vn~.m o0 m _ 3vo'' O.~'o . ~N °~ 3~ ~r So n~o wo.'N°OCm m ~ _, " w n o ~ d p S `2 S _. _ d n ~ ° ~ ~ y d N O N 3 d O .. O tU O n . ~ ~ F C d O ~ ^ ~ ~ a N T _ .~ ~ ~ J _ ~ . _I O S O _ .. m J . 5 ~ m 5 `^ 3 S ^ _ " _ ~< ° N . n w 6 J 3 5 K _ "O .~ 6 . s " d w n ~ d N N C .J. N F. d- ° J ~ D- O w N " N J T O. O _- n 6~ n ~» y JJ O N N O_ O O n `< m (J 0 ^ ~ N O j .d. O C F z O .+ N O n O ~ Z ~ .~ O N w G 6 y .. - ~. S S w n p N j N j °_ ~ 0~ ~_ ~ ~° p N N 'n' .dr O 3~ . x~ m S ~p O ry O- < ry ry n° n p N w O F J S N C `G N ~ ~, ~ w 0 ° F- ..~ J N S ,G ° nO J w J J w °. N .~ ~ o ~ n .... nrdn C)~ ~ ~'d nwm~ ~sm~R Fo ' mFm~m'v'o w m'w o.ow y : ~ _ w m3w' m~ ' o ° n'o dam>~.oz cmv~no . ~.~: .: C]~. o=w - - 6 3y ~ n n» C o 6 ° ~ 9 O. F O' O w O Nm v n O N 3 p O N E `L d O7 N N j N C.'6 . ': ~. y j } 3 (VO -O° O `Z ~• 6 ~- ~ O N C) ¢ n "O J C) O N d U O ~° m d w .--.' N { ~ ~ . j J a(n N" TO Sd~~.. ~ TN d W O' i N 500< d N S N N N OF V G1¢ U ~ ` _ ~ w-O 5h ~i 3 ~ ° ^ ~~ ` .: '~ ~ ~< C J 6 O <p O N N Q d d N (N. ~ ~ (j < O N J O N 2 w 0 0 0 O ~ . ~ O Q 6 G .... , .. H: I 1 ? w ry y A C B O. N N 0 'O ' » y C % w J J N w w O N N .~ 0 S (J O ° O Q O ~ ~' O N N " ' 1 : ~~ ~ w 0 . ~ w J . d ~ v C7 G N j N w ~< 3 n O S O ~~ d O ^ n . . . ~ `G J ~. C m ~ m N Q N ~ N N_ " N y 0 N 0 = ro i ~~ C)£N NNS3n 09N~~'^ w 2J ~C [ p `G ~O.ww n N(p J ° '~ ~: ~ c° s 3 " o o ~ ° ° '~ rv ~ o ~ -o ~ °- m - m ° o ~J m ~ D n w ° o :. es ~ J~ o~>> Jo .°.3 ~m~ mm W --OO? w SJ ~3(mp y~mm~ P' :. . q. ._: y w 6 `< X 0 0 O N F F O .~ O N J j "O w W ~: ~ h Ji C O O ryas . ~ . o~y v.3¢~° N°~=~9 _ 0 ^ n~ wo,~m'<3 1 y"m 'm NO -o ~~'+' ~. ~ ~3 x ~ o00 ~- a o ~~D 3 o N.vm n? 2n N0.- oB F~°~ .: .: °' N 3 3 j 3 N _ CJ ~ N w -~ 3 w ~T J w J 3 n y n •Ji QJ S ~ C (p = T o o O ° m o o ~< 5° o w (° ° w N m 3_ o o v m . ° m~~ n o c °w w ~ rN~mw "vi w w m F ~~Nc° nv ~c < o -.3s ° .. 53 » m ~. ' ': w J N '< J 3 w o v ~~- o n n . n om -. m m o and 5 N w o ~ o J J f»J c» . n mg 3 N 0 ~ ~ we ~< y (7 aio 0005 S S ... W_ o 3 n mm d N~ 0~ N dw~ . ~ D°Nw_ = N C Nw O ' O S J n CSK a w n 3O ~ F wF?w.iJ O N ~ n ~ . ~°'NN J p d S - w» F N '~ » J p O N j. »1 ^ ~ n N C . i J n ( /! o C] ~ J O w j ~ N N w d j n N _. w 5 O D .-~ w ''C y p O' N v~ d N J O n N m j --.. N m g~ ~ 3 ~ ~~_n5' O m-iT O N .~ . -r m< w N ' ~ ~ w ~ d O O - N J N N ° Fv _ 5 m '. -I. m ° i w ~. c ° ~n 3 ° ~' -~ ° mm o O 'F~ v i '° y N g: ~ ~ y -co o ~ o ¢ ~ p. ~' m m v+ ~ S s m ~ - N n D r 0 C m m Z N O { m ~T Om Zn ~_ C r TV TM .7 A n^ /^I I/ n n n om N ~ i ~ O O T O + G N W m~ ~ ~F ~ b ~ ~'..;: ~ m~ O ~~ J O O :© O g r m 1V11 V N J fit ~, `y' a... '+ ~ - r - r - :: ~ :: m: ~ , ~. o m 'o m J o 3 m ~ 00 W O ~ vm + om ~ ~- W -i m ~ O~ ~ ~ 0000 > > s o mss O m _ m'Fd -I » ~ a= ~ N y z ~ v ~3 ~ o mJ ~ ~ '%' . ~ m 3 w p W .. ~°"vF Z n~i~ v~ ~_ y p W 0~ ~ mOJ ~ ~ ~ 7u pw a ~ -O 0.:. O T fn n N < G O m e tO ~O J y :':'"1~. :~rl'~:~:~: ~:~: ° . ~. () 0 3 ~) m 0. w m ~ o ~ N m ti J - m ~ tl . ~. :~: m ~ ~d r n ~ a 3 ,Z^ N 0 9 __ '~ y ,. rte 7J ~ N T V/ 6 N ld p . :~~ : x ~ r s ~ ~ 3 :.~ C a ~ ~' ~ :':N ' : Z ° N ° . y. .. . .. : ~ w m ~ y {r z ~ ~wN F ~ mod d m mm~' m` d W~ ° = . ~ ~ P Zom cmO D Dim ~ d :~[+F dE ~~~ t d d3 ,..,Yy ~: d ~ c ~g, c ~ o ~ o m o o ~~ .7 nom M7 . ~ . :~:~y ~].: ~ 0 0 o Y ° p (O J "O N Q= n S n N j C S N W m d N J d d J~~ S S~ `V D °~ w (p c -pp C d ~ O O 3 F S m d-O O ~~ m "6 m ° ^ - N m »'° F~ ~ -m o J 41 6 O T m ~`cv o o d ~ m wm ' .. OOc < J 7 D »1 J° o n m o ~oJ ° . W J n O a m ~ m ° ~ °m y a umi m s v 3~ °o n J. o y o »» 0 3 d - ~ (Om -° O S~ n J w~ J C w J O D JJ ^ O H O (m^J $ J S O S w ~ N . J "O 3~ y 3 a' n ~ 3 m m n C V J ~ j m (/1 m O y d y C~ ... p ~. W~ S v - n _ ~_ O= N ~ J ~ 2 ° m O n D 0 ~' s v~ m O J S.J.. d ~. m n n- S J C Oi ~^ O O N m ^ o _ ~~ n ~ ~" ~ a ~° ~'m n m m d n ~~ 0 3 3 m~ c ~ o ^ d' m ~ ~ 3 c p o m n o m o m~ F m m~ ... d m o ~» J~ ~' 'o J a n= 3 m n . i o J o °_ ~ m c o J "m 3~°F'33°'m m'mmnm m~°~~ m ~~c co ~ E,o p00 ,: a5o mm :yes n> 3~¢~ w cnvv~~ ~ -~ m o Omm~o m J a' . ° Sm 3lm o'O W ° ^ ~3 an ¢3 m O< o v . ~~ ti ~ ^ nm d m m' d J 0 D o s o m w _ O_ ~ 3 ~ v O v d o D J (O x J 0 J n p ... w l ¢~ o tO ~ d 3 O N c J v J n C ~ : . _ "O ~< m F~ 6 + J T ° J< ~ f0 O m O S O m Jl ~ O~ n m ': ~ . . R O N O _1 p~ A ~i ~ w~ y ~' o x p j T (p N 3 Q~ o m O J» F o f°~- C N < n~ m o~ a m O `G ~~ S J n ~ .' Cz} .; Z .;: - o ~~a~ JQ n ~w ~ m m w ~~ m ~ m °~~ yn o:s m mmo F3 .. .: y F o o ~ J r. c ~< ° o 3 ~- ~° ~ m J m , o w J S O ~ • v' .. J d l1 'T W N 9 N m _ W ^ m °~ r {O 6 ~' O N n m -~ ~O ~ m 3 J 9f (O ~ N N F O B V J `< U ~ ~' j N y 3 C) J 3 O (O JJ n : . m~ c F n ~ m `m n ~. o o» ~ ~ 'fir s F o B. m j J ~..~ do ~~ ~, o n o fn _ ms nam y» o~ m~ m w of ~3~ w ' .moJ~ y F s mmm:m mJ J w~ o °`° S oFVO. y 3 ~ 7.7 ° ~c Jcy x3 mom m m o m ~nr.m m ' S O'mm~d 6t°-J ~.~ ~ ~~ 3mCO w W ~' b :: r"q ~" °13o~F ~<z. r~ ~:^o~~ °^mo~~pE ~,y m da a n m N= m om ~ N ~ ° ' m ° o° O N<~ ~? N U m o J r n `O f ~ "~ , o m d v p yo o m=ho o° o - m~ 3y c °"T~ ~~ ?'Q WO g0 . ~~ ~o~ ~ . C cGt° ..JVV 0~ zc ~ 3 N m 3 m ' ~ mom. °~ o o~ ~, J D `° ~ m S ~~ ~ N `~ .. nJ o.d 5 3 ~ ~~ v, c m o no no m mm,o-~ n m mpmm ¢ 6 m nJ .x m _. F d m c and ~' ~ O° G1 J m S p O "' 3 ~ y C d r `G d ~ m N ~ 3 i ° O- m y 3 3 ~ C C m `G .-. N n ¢ O~ T ~ p= N 0 F O ~ ~`p ~ d~ O F D .m. m d d 31 m C ° N ~ ~ p O j N d O lJ m n m »»~ S J . C W 3 O< n T d d »F `° m'^Da v ~~ Q and ° o: . O d O< °~ 0 m a^ ° m O S J 3~a"m W m~ ~- ~`°G om~°Oo a m o o F s y p m dF O~ O w ( o» F a J O J 7 m ° J y ~ n~ m. d. d .m-r ~ J ^ m¢ UJ J _ S N O 4 m °- O. m N p m O. N `< C f ~ O = c 3< <. ~. n~ J T O O d j j m N J N 6.< ~ `G 6 `< m m w ~ ~ ~ 3 m O j ~ J p O S O d N J m m m@ ( J .' m N c V ..'.;. .: ~ d ..'.'.'.'.~.'.'.'. ... .... a a r C m m Z N 0 { ~ O ~ T ~ ~ m Om z~ r { D 0 /D~ Y/ RI ~^ I' n ^~ LI om N N J v 0 w °a ro ~ ro ~ 9 ~ ro ~ ~ ~~~~~:k:::::::::::: '::;.rye::.': .'.~ a o o "" '~ o N a~ l+7 . K1'I'I'I<~I'I .... ': ~ 3 : :;::::: :: ': ~: ~: ~s[':':':':': ~: ~: .. .. .. ., :'D:'::':~.,. ~c:':'::':':': ooo~ N np ~ anaoo-~ ~ ~ S n N ^. ~ O w.0 » y"O J J J w ('~ 3(o N. ~ ¢ mm m ? 3 '~ ~ J m ~o ~ '. :::p:.77':':':~:~:': a d m n J w '. c D `< N ~ Z Z Z c v m~ 3 or, o O m ~' yy.y~ m,~,"`° P"' Z N N ~' N O O t0 W N~ ('1 W O~~ 1:~ ~ 2 J of () w `Z O o A 3 m° d 3 m''< '' ':':ti3':`c~:'::~::~ ~ :: -: ' p 7 ~ O_ O^ W O ~ O < 0 ~ d J ~ .P-rl (n p . . ;: '~I:~/ N , ~o d m d >- iad m ~ ~ » ~ '~ m n o 3 x~ :'>R?: tt1.;.:'>: :': ..... . m a m p g m O. n N .'~. O 7 ~ d O O. A N .O :: ':':~ .~.... . . O V O 0 ~ N N 3 ;: vi o J a ~ ;. :. ~:~:m:':..::.'.'.'.' ~ O N :': ~~ 3 p 3~ ~ ~ m 3~ ro ~ :... ry1'~'~'~'~':: d D t ~ A ~ d yy:':':':':':' o'r 3 m °. r m m '° ~° m ~ ~ n m E ~:~:~:~~~:~:~:~~~~~~ :':~L=J:~ ~'~'~:~:~: ~ r d ~ ~ :':{A':'. :' O D ut O~ O N "~'CCCC~ .'1~: 0 0 ~~ 0 0 y yy y :' ': 5:~ 3:':':':":' . . r: exi:': ;:::.: O D O O N .;..~;. :. ': : IV : ' O e o ~ o o ; . . :.: : :':;:.p;: ~ :::.:.:. .:.:: ::: ~:CC!'I'1'I'[ w.: n :::::::::::::: m m ~ rdn ¢ S a S • ~ m~» to a 'd0 < O m°~ D m c (i C~ D o S N~ n O N o O 'o m to d S~ - '' . w~o'~ui .c ~N _ ~domm od- wg(nOn~ ~.~o.o ° o n SN~3_o`m'~nc Fd~n' w : ~ g n 3 v ~ n 2 m m' .d. v o o o< m 3&< m 3 m 3 a m ~ ' 3 3 3 c ~x o=° w~ ~' O F o n d ° ' n o w» ~.~ m o »~» o~ v m p m F~ o ~~~ J . : .1 L~ fC ~ , J d 0 . . m ~ J 3 m O N j j 3 Pn a ~ m n o J^ ~< J (7 9 , ~ ~ m ~ N N J t0 d '~ N' n $.o»Trv =JO C] F f7 .°. 3 m d Jsm d.E you J F.~- od S J No-mom ~ o'O a°a 3.N3d 3 fn n d ~ .'o mm 3 ~ » ~ a ~ W d ~ o J y .o ~ B. m. a ° » ° Q w o d 2 x~ ~ o~ F ~ O w w. » ~ ~ m e m~ » 5 o ~ so ° J O ~ . m ~ ~° ~ -O 3 - a' o - ~w oa ~m n _ . . . n y n3 ~Jyd ~ sm ~ :. °a m "~ N J 9 . °=o i .N ~ O ^ y ~ m ~ JJ ~ ~ ~ . . 3 N 3 n J ~O » d O O. w m s p ( S 9 O O -6 N ` . ~ p N y d d JJ (j 3 O n. p O. < O. 1 .1 (d~ N d C T N n _. a Cl N~ w ~ N ~I d S~ N O N N? O. n 0 `G d< N G. O :':':':':':':':~:' ~ ,~ n n c~ m n d d 1 O: N O O < ~ J< 3 d d~ »~ O J (/1 N ~ A d N 0 N N C~ ~ ` O N N S W d N .T N J N n.~ < N N J w .Ni .':.'::.'.':.' ..::: ..: : _ N a ~. ~ N < d O F ~ d F O B N¢ 0 L J y n (~ ~ j N d a m N N a ~ N N `< d <~ j~ d~ S O ( :~. C'.' :.'.'::.'.'. ~ c c'~ md- n : ( '°» 3 °'° i mo 0o m m'43~.wa , v-mm 0»;2 00' o :':'77:~:':':': :':' °~ 6 °~ ~ ~ m r O s c ~ °'m n m 1 ~. J m ~ °' n n a 'oo v ~^ J m c` Z d n~~ o :':'1i7::~:~: ~: ~:;~: ~JOO ~°d '°~ d r J' ^a Do'»°aJ 3 aim m m5.o o-im d o o d w d ~oN. B m E 2--T.'-~J `~ " ~ ':': Z':;C;i»: :':' :'::' ' ':':~ J O d `< d v~ y' °- o ~ ^ S•< . d c ~ ~ m T s 3 ~= . o- .-. m o z s O a? ~' °m $ F m an d m . m o n ~ d? s °. j °w J n ~ F f . : N '~'~vi:~:~:~:~:~:~ ~ ~ 6~~ 3 N ~ _ .Q ~ 00 N 3 ~ Qn O nn_ O ° S n 3 ~ , _ SC7 ~. d S O. °-N "O (A d N N N F :':'nj.'::.'.': .' . ' ' ~ j <j ^ J d o m ' ° . > S _ a Q D N~ ~ a n`2 3 c 3 T w tp O j " ~ m o m d xy n ° 6 w~ y S N O t i ~ » w na m ~ 3a ...:. :.:.: .. _ . : ~ .v ., m v. m' J d ~~ „ „d m N 0 7 d E~ o ~< d~ 6 ~: m m w -i p ' y .m ~ o a o a r "' S J ° d '''' '''''''''''''' iit~:;:::::!::::: n v ~ m n > F 3 ~ o A° J» O d m ox"<zom- ° s w~ 4 m m °i ~ nw om wo- a m '^ ° 8~ i m n ~° y d Nro3 =w3 ~~ ~$ . > d ~+`"' y v d w^~"o aa' o~ o w ? o ~ o J-" oN J o d ~~o '^ Sdm~~a ' : ':b n d A+N3d v. ~o Jww~.n y »m o"O ti~m n3 -`~.0 o . 0 o c J.¢~ d °.:w nd d ~: '~ -'~ y VJ 6 N d 7 N ± J X D' d N O (U S a C N N y S c z a S 3 o s () ' , J N N 3 O O d d W O '1 d s :'.Q ....'. .'. :~:~:~:~: ~'~' in:: o` m 3'a ~ o d J m n w (O f ~ - ~ o Q c m 2 JJ m ' a t n y y n T 3 ~ J o m -~ 3~ N d d Q N : y ~` : ~ d" N n N~ J _`2 .O. J (O N O J S . S d. . N n N O J C N d J J 6 'O v ~ n S O J S ('1 3 S N t0 O 6 d ~ m N N d n N ~p ~ i N O 6 p O c d J ~ N C J 6 `G y . } ~ ~~ ~"`~~~'~'~'~'~'~' "~.': .'.'.'.'.' O _ T d~ ~ _ N d d O- N C° • S.y N fQ N~ O i N~ F 3 < J O J N» ~° N d N N C 1 p p< .. t J r J O n . d O N~ ` _ _ N O w O O W J O o O d m m N? N d Z~ C O o ~. S c ., c 3» N m CJ C7 5 y Y 3 z o ~ c (] p o S N C . Ji .Nr .di G »! N 3 w J . y w d s o m d -3o W~¢ 3 3~ s c m m , ~ D 3~ ~ m w m n ' n .N- o s' ~ r o '~ ~ 0 3 ~ d m . = o » c_ m `~ J m `° o' ' s d o 3 J n o m fn °~ p ry F J y w » J o d $ 'w - F~' ~ O ry [y ry j o a p o o '^ m (7 ~ 'y' °- 'T d 3 F ~, 2 N lp. N< . o f c o _? J~ d 3~ w - 3 N C d (7 g S G O< O S N C N 2~ (] J .d C .di d $ ; ~ J~ T. ~~~ J dd = .' m m m and ~ ~ ~ ~~'i.' 'm nO yE o ~' R d m ~° a3~m ¢ m j O. S J d d ry N p ~° n `D (n ~ ( p j O' 3 0 J d n N N O Cy N O a a r_ T~ V m m z N O m O 2 r/ 1 T~ /T\ TV W ^O^ L/ m N N m "'~ n -Jl 1 O m -~ m 3 m n C r ^~ L/ o m N W i V1 ~ O ~ ~ J ~ ~ N O W ................ ................ m N O a N N t °n ~:':Q~;4'~'~'~'~'~': m 0 A A ~ W + r O . ~'.'.'.'.~.'. ((~~ I'[~iijJl~[~[~I~[ i'?.K'.' 1':':":":' i 0031 D o m D 00-{ 3 .o w 00 ~ o~ O m 31 D O W D n J W o 000 ~ 0 o m 00 o o w N ~ ^ _ C n 6 w= 0 = N ro n O < 6 n= F y ~ O ry+ ; 3'y ~~JC) 3.J-.m D3 ~y3c wm D? ~ D?w :: 0::;::::::::: ~ ~ ~ o D F a o N~ '0 .. 3 m m Om C 3 W O 3 ~ O C : . . .;.;;y::. [sJ'CC''~ C L .J.r ~~ 3 fA " `y< 3 N ~ y W r N Z V 3 N w N w O W •• N J A - N Z (] 3 O_ n '~ w A N N ; ~;:;;;:;::;; ':':~::. ... ' y~0-° OW ~ VO Z ~ A.. .. O ~ d ~ tU O ~~~ ;: .. { .. .......:....: .... . ~ ' ' :~' y° N O W w m a w V 3 O. N C) fA J O 3 H J N O fA rD W N N O ~ 0) - " + . . . .... . .. A. rD~ (O J 3 (T N O D N V N N W O lT N W ~ ~ W ¢ N n t0 O N O 0 / J.'W'. C'.C'.'I :'.~r T ~~ O O N ? w ~ ~ O ~ N W J w ~ N w °J d r F ~ .'.'tG'.Ch:;:;.::;:;:; ~ y^ 0 O A O O N T O ~¢ F ti V y ~ O j D :; ~~ N ~ m n _...;. ~ y W ~ N J J .;.~;': .'.:r~':~:: d ~ d : .' x::5:::: ::::: . W R ~ n „~. ...... ; ':'sy: ' :::::::.:'. x c '< ' N ~~ a m ~ ao a ~ro;:~i«~: w z N N Y m 3 S N d N s .'.G+7'. '.'C:J:~~'~'.".'.'. o - „.:c:p:::.:.:.: ° c° m o m 0 ° o N :~:~a::~...~.:. ~.~.-. ~:::: ~a oo ao oe W o >~. e ~:: ' y ~ °w' m s m ~' n ^ ~ °' ° ' m = m ~ ~° ~ 3 3: o' ~ B o ? ~ r° '< o ~ y ~ ~ m m ? ~ ~' o ~ s ~~ v i ^ ~ S 2»~ N J J ~ K] N_ O ~ ~ w F N N n O j N pl O -. C C N ' » O <. rp N C ~ .~ N - 3° p < w N ~ N w Q O O O ~ y _.. 3 6~ yY wa J J y . . ~~ ~ ~_ O Q C Q N J N p m B.H 33 Jam. 6 O J D C U j m o '~ 3° ¢ O. N 'O O. ~ c B O° "; ~: O? ~ aB ' =m=. W S o~ O o. ^. ~ ~ w 3 v i O " . (O J¢ p N J j O W ~_ N S N Q (O {0 w ~- N< W S i i C (j . O~ < .. fQ J .Ji ^, . J ~ O P 1 J i -~ N O O J N N O C 0 n ` w U C Q N N O N Ji °~ '~ ~ ~ _`< •^' . _R ~ N O O ! j 3 W O ~ O 0~ ~ - X 0 0 31 .J.. C O - < J f S~ W j J^ j C ~ , (O j Q . D . O j i 1 ¢ O O S N N N S _ O 6 y O y 31 -~ ° O CJ ~_ O ' p N n 3 ^ m .. D a. o' w ' O » D 5. Oy 3 W -O ~ - N T` y n v s O. O N ~ C W D o "° .. . 6 N N Z O o w o ~ o f0 r O 3 .o J o 3 . c w o~ v 3 O J ° N S _ o a J~ S _ -O J y s 0- O C J 3 W O N . 0 cL ~ o O J O ~ m S n . ':';~;~: ~ ~; ';' LL J ~ . N C N °-~N- N A °-O. SN N w -6 3 S O.N.. N ~ N SN = .6~ O J h m .~-pr N 3I : 3 ( Nf 6... [/I () D(7w"O O N " ¢ ~ 3 W z w . . : ~ ; ....... "O (D N' N 0 w y F. 0 S N O w N V=¢ Q¢ O ~ ~ N ^ SS vy 3Q i w W (C/1 'O J m G f0 X~ O" J N~~ N O O O ~ O O O w ° n J d O `G w ;';'~];'~'~'.'.'~'~' ':'; G':'; ~.'.';':': w VI O (O ° O ° O ..w0 N N 'O 0 i S ~p 7 w O. N m N n N N O i ~ S . . Q~ °° J_ 3 w 3 g Q C J N N ~~ .' ;":'~.:';'.',';';' y C'O N V O Q .y,' 03 Rc .. . N f0 O N U J N poowra w N `G j vs_< Q N 3~ j~ N 3'<3o m3o_ m 'O j F W f w S ~ !Rw"oy~ F (no O C~ C mm 3 . : ~ ~ ~ ' O^~ S 0.. c ~° 1 N N n `2 O ? N N ° 3 w [C 3 N o S S y ~~pp W 7J °~° °- N -I p J N N "~ o .J. ~: ~: Z ; .;::': ; : ~ :':'i_}.':'.'.'::':' i . o ~~o m~~ w O F w O ( _ y¢ ¢~ -_ s O' . -r (O ~ w o E. - J 3 ° °~ 3 So m N y O (0 6 ~ ~ m m~ o w J 5 » j 3 4i w Cam. » C .:!y~:~:::~:~:~: I _ ~ .'1T J ~ ~ N ryry N O. ~ 6° J S y N J O O N W C N. w J N O C Q N =° N J (= N .~ °" AA ~' ~'~'r':':': ': ;';" °D¢m mf N ~o E.5m B. nm o= J'z~ ~H ~ m10 _ x 3 J<_?w-wo B ' 30 0~ J c . ~. i <';~'';';.;';':': 3 F o J p y J ro n° o o o V 2 y m (O w o- - o '° D~ 33° ° o . o ,~ g~ 2 m a ~ j o .. m., . . . . . ^sv 3~ °: < S C m~m`° H n O O ~~ c ° ' o~ '~ O W~ ~ J NvJ B .m x ~'~ Q ~ Nm gS W . . . . . . .: :I:~'bi:'i%I' w .~{ ~ F 3 0 °' W . S~ O w "O N O _. S y N~ J O N ~' N M n S¢ `~. V _ ~ a . ¢¢ -1 N O N ° ~ O o ~ C~ 6 6 31 J .' .. ~.'.'.'.". .'.' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , o m° o, m - ° _ 3 °¢ r O Q s r n m o J m¢ o E c ~ o m~° o 3 m rn ~~ d v g ~ O o ~ o w° 3. m m o J~ -° ~< y w o ~' g ~ s : : 7~: i: : : i? ': ~:~: a'::~:~:~:~:~: ~ . ~ ~ o- O ` ° m n 3 - ~ 3 N N S w ~ , O j 6~ ~ O~ (p~+ J 0 0 w ' -~' n 2 w `G `< J S S O -O " " f~ w N° `< n O N J C ~ W N _ JS ¢ O J_ N `. ~ .O <. N r° N ~ 'O y C C O 6 P S N (J O . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J t0 6 J 7 ° E F s o ~' J O N ~ N~ 3 Jn. v, m~ O O ° N J O W W 3'p N 3 a' £. 0 5 m W 3 1 `L-. ;c N '~ N "O N o T O= O w- ° ~ U'j•.::::~:~: :~:~ : : : : : :~ N " F ~ N % N y S () =¢ N Cj N¢ 3= ~ m 3 C 0 OJ ~ O y .Ni J J 3 ~ V O O> ~ ¢ a J N ~0 S j. S p ~0p. Q ~ J~ (O y 3» 6 J . ° O 311 S J J ' ; ~ m D ~~ 3 m a T~ ~ ~° o y~ 0 2 ~ y o c m 3 w a ti ~ T w o ~ ~ Q C , O w 3O F o ~ ~~ y y C w m w 6 . J S (D J S y fD D N S O y O H O J ' J C J O O O j ~ N ry~ ,T. ~< ~ -O C N, < Q () O. m J W w 0~ d w (D Jf O N 3 ~ w w 0 ... ¢ :< ~ ^1 O ~ F _ O ~ O $ ? 0 ~. J ~ (ND C ~ i ~' w ~' :~ w -I O. (U N N C0 z 2 S J W m m O y. ~ d y , N N ~ m v '3 ? O N _ ~~ ~ ~ ~J ~ m Vi F C m ¢ ¢ c 2 j o m w ` m < < ti ~ ' w y O 4- Ui J y~ w ~ J S o (p < o ~ ~ j S' n ~ w f.° w S ~ ¢y 3: z N y g o m ~ J w m o y O N C N w 1° ~ N ~• ~ y w ~ m w J (/J S ° ~ W N fD W J.S N \! J~_ l D r /O m m Z TVI V z n o~ ~o m pm z~ ~ C =r n L r~ N r'Ar''~ r~I i/ A n n n D c m N A N Q O T ~ ~ O m a a a v a 'e a y ................ ::--ro'~:~:':~:> N ~ O teO V O O V O V .m': ~:~:~:~: ~: :':':'iii:.;... _.;. .. .. .. D>:':':''''''' nn W 0 o.w c~c»v o~ m m c)nTv o o m pn~~ O o m C)C]mp m~ o ° ~D 6 ~p ~p :: : : . . ~ = y am _ .Ji y (( 3p~ S = » y ~~ C .J-r 4Ji m 3 C ' J~ N m w J 6 ~. n ; : ; ;,; ;.;.:.:.;.; ~: ..... . ~- (^ m o (^ C J w o N 'Z ~ o m .[J,r C m c d F v J F N F ` v~ ::?~:;py: i:'i:~:' - .. » O »~~ n m D» D J ~ ^ . J o O ~o J m J O m J 3 z' 0: :':':':':' ~ N °1 a L7 d . . D p , Q W. :.;. . ; :~:~:~:~: ~: . m N 3 3 ~ N ~~ o o ~ m~ n .. ~ m F ° m< ^ o~ ~ c ~~ ~~ S ~ m ry~ m ::::Y~:~::;::~;~:~;: ° r ~ ° o- r v '? 'n 3 m o r c ? m c = m :': ~n :...:.:.:.:.:.: 5 m c e I Y~l : iii: :'? O w ~ m 9 O V a A m m ~; O 3 N ~ m m N c Om C ~'m C Nm p,~ ; ;ry Lbr"~1. I'S'I'I'I'I'I'I ~ x ym' v o s~~ m o `~ ~ ~ a a m a :~ ;:;:fte: yt?1:;:;:::;:::; ...... ~ °~'0~ 4 Jl ~ a Oy y m o 3 o ao D ^ ~ ~ t V S N 1 N (U ~ t J ~ ~Z'~ ' '~' '~ ~ ~ ~ N N N y : . '. ' ' . ~': . J w s w o ..... :~:~vi::O:::J>:~: 3 a ~ s m n ° ~yy ':':ft 'S `.'.':'.'?.' N ~ ~ . . ~ ~. 'cm m W o " n n d m~ d~ ~:b::::::: N `G m 3 ~ N N y `G v. A `G N q'a :'''''~I'f m m m > fD ° ° ' m : : r s m w 3 o° m ~ 5 5 m g 5 m m m m 5 ~.~:...~ - ~:~:~r.~ 3: : : : :~:~ :f ~J r ~ m t m r r m r m ; ; : ; . :~:~T : ',1:::~:::;::::::: :~: M'r O O N A N O e N N p ~ p w O o y ~'.q". •lr'~~.~.'.'. ~' ro;:+ ti 'y+I L;.:. II[ 0 o a W e o m o W o ~ a ~ . ~ ; . g;,~;~,::;;; ' [ ~ }3:' Ls} I' I' I' I' b I' I': y:ci'::::::::: :~:~b': ~~:;:~:~:~:~:~: o N N o O r y n ~:' ~„ e'''-' 0 o e e a e c::.::;''::': `P~~S O NC C^'O 1~ m s °', o " ° Q Vm~- o x s ° w ~p ~p ~m~ s z'oc ~ mNa~ J o y >• vi c_a v=t»(»~ o m J >• NgJJa ~ o m s ': '. S H N N ° _ 3 ' ~. y 3 N p O 3 O " w O ' 0 N D N N y»~ ~ O. Ll ~ A , O my- " O~ w L7 ~ N_ N N N N ~` O (~ (~ ° y w (~ y m N l N a ( °~ S y O ~~ n O C R ~Ypt y C O 6 y w a SC O J• O Q -.'. O a W 3 J H S O ° n O ~ Q H -O n. '- H O J Q' ~ lfl a » J y 0 . ; N~ ° n o ~c W S 2 m J N ~ _J~ ~ m y~ m N s -Im (~ 6 ~ ~_ _ S_ mom W `Z `2 (O N A N~ _ ~ 3 w A w : °w °-' ~" O ~¢m ~ w o F¢" ' "y w-J`J °-'. o"a m?;Df. ~~ Im'o' B o °-d' , o-.~ s° .: = s o w o~ s ~ m <' . ~ m F °' a ~ n °. ... n F. . - ~~ o B n 3 3 F w~ ' < c E O N `< C m w w N w~ O j _ y ~O m~ a O~ O . W N N ~ S m O 4 " ~< O N f • -r O y_ (SD ` ` G O ^ y ~~ m~ N N ^~ ~ N m S N ~ J O p a 3 .O (^ .-. O m J j . n ~ j S ~ N N y .' m (/1 .... y w S O F y ~L 0 ~ S F O N ~ < O m C O H O " ° O N . j y O n __ ~ S d ~ m m N O _ ry : S J m 6 a m o '^ 3 '° J w m B. ~ ' J e 3 o o :°. ~ ~ m n a P m w s C $ m < » N C a J< = m n n o ~ ~' . ° o 0 3 . ~:~:~:~::~:~:~:~: m' n y J - m J ° m a ~ N m o- ~y ~ r `< m om m a °- r ° N w y O IO . n ( a _ R~ m~ S O , ~ J O ° (O N y (O `G , T. N (O O S m _ ~ c (7 'w W 2. J • i N = y w fO J 3 m N m m j O-O N w N w N n. ~' C O [D. 0 7 O O y y (M1 O ~ y' F m. S : :':'I7:':':'.'::':' '. '.~. L.e..'::. :.'.' O ]1 J o 3 o J tO d 3 J ~ m -1 w >• N N _~.~ S `~ (o n m J o m n o. m w J' o J J J n ° ' O 7 J J x S m " . .. w wtO ~ ~ _. m m o~ z o m m ~° 2 J 9 3 o a w m : :'i73:':~i:~:~:~i : : : : : a Q ~. w m ~, -g m J 3 m a N m c v o y °- ¢'~ ~ m - o o -. o ~ m a o -1 w J y '_: y s ^ o y d J n~ : ; : : : :~ :~:~~:~ e m m o mm 3 o- _. y (p .< ° J o n m o o m o D o- m , o a y e y o ~ .o o S m m c m J Z m x o m J~ ~ ~:~:2':~:~:~:~:~:~: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' n^ J w. o o m V (° ~ w J ~ ryN C ~ 0 m J o ~ C ^ C - _ ~p C O o 6~ S (n - 6 O ° m N O J (O (D N ~ ¢ . . 1"I. : . . . . . "N':' ' ' " J ° w O ~ ° y ~ J N m (O D'O .1 ° ~ 6 n y_ p ~ F - ° O y N » . i C ' ( ^I p O wID_ O ~' C »I C! N :. . : . i I; I ' ~ ~ w V O = S~ 3 S F . l0 6 - `. tp O S O S ~ J O y Z ~ Z o m F m ~ O d O O m A 9 C ~~ J ° ~'.'.']'''.'.' c O_ D N 3 . (O p j O^ N F" J » O JJ ~ '" n _w 3 c w O `°<O ' j~ n W m y N J . J w j n C f° S -• y J • F N ~ ° : ~.':~~:':~:':'. :~: :':~y?:: ~::~:::~:~: ` , °~ n" m o N O -ia < Li o. m o n S n y n ^ N Q C w c c .< Q S] ~. N° N~ `G ~$. N 6 ~. n y d S .' .. ~. ~' ::.:::.:.:::. pf D(o ° ~ y 41 ~3 0 ~ ~° N N omo y j. y om 3J mm . 3 ~ '° ~ E.w vim c szs~ o ~^ o :':.;ti ::.:.:.:.:.:.: : m c J N JgaS o -y m~ ' ~ ~J 3 ~' J m'mao n J~ O y 3J c y 0 ~ ° s» 3y <m = N ~ y ~ ~ w m N w° ....~ ....... '.'.Q':~.'.'.'.'.'. J C 3 . a ° N ~° C ' ~ , N n J m 1 N O n ~., m . . . S ~^ ~ .4ii .. ~''~.:.;.;.~.:.;.: UI w of ~ S O w o~wJJ °-a nm o-c J m3'o c) 3 D nJ s m N « ~ O N mJ ^' 3 O J ~^ Jrn m B- ~^ j. N m?Qc ° : ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a n w a N J m O J L u O S N. `L O C wm O y w , y J C= 6 m y ~~ (^ T N C w n m n C_ ID S= '.' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. I `f .'. VJ'.:': :':':~. O Q _ a ?~ (O N S y J == Q (O S J J F y S m 3 .°.. N ». ~ j~ 3 Q C . (p O. N m N :' ~40~0 F ~'m =TB ^o B wF ~0 3 F ~°-' ° i'^a 3 yro o~m ~ J.<y . 3o mom , y ^ow o n: yo g O N, m O w J S n ° w <'o ~ J d ' W =~ m y n ~ ' n n S (~ °~ d= m 3 D~ ~ ~ m °1 ~ ~ y m y m o y w 4 ~ m . w o. d a y J N . 3 3 O' ^ -. x~n m ~p J J p. H ~ y m 3~ s m 3 J ~ m F g O ^ :~: j J, y J N^ 3 tO m N N . S : ~ W , ~, J O `G Q : X N m F ' N `,mG ~ 6 N O v N• 7°' - J ,O >. p N N O, N m N N° ~~ j °. ~P o O d o- -I o. 3 m , I m o 0 0 S~ N o J O J c J ~ ::: N a n r 0 C m m z ~ n O m ~ T ~ ~ m Om n ~~ 0 O m IN V/ m a om N ~ i ~ O O ~ ~ ~ 9 ° 9 ° ~ v 9 7 : ~ . yo s m m ;p ~ ... Q r o W p :~ a a . '~: .'.':':':~ tT A t3.: ~ . ~ . .. .. ~ Wf m I L~f N~ ~ JJ 0 0 O ° w v w v Z D D D O~ O -n ~ D~D ~ O ° ~ v < . Z /~ wm sin ~ ?m " ~ c o m mmm ~y ~ O~ O~ N J 3 0 N~ N 0 l° ~ Y~ ~ .a ° ~ ? ~ 3 3 ~ .. ¢ ¢ n S to o ~ 3 m m o m 3 m J ::~ K7 ''t7. m ~ 3 ~ m Z o 0 0' ~ ° c m m m v 7J yO w w C_ O~ o ¢ ~ J W A ~< =1 N ~yy ('~" V w ,_ N O '0 [C'sy :' ':':000~: ' ~ O.. W v N S W N o N W W ( ll m Z l0 ~ O O W o N A N~ ~ r . . , r ~ ~?11'I'iiil' :' tO w ] ~: N J O U (n ' ( :~.:p~.ClJ :...:.:.:.; O gyp ;. n ~ ~ 8 m: 3 `~ Z ~ ~ .; ~ m v Z v. m _ m ~ x IQ d m O N °-°• - ~ a a ao~_5 n~ 0 x an d x ~ .b m N + A ~ w ." ~. F ~ w 3 ro ~ ~ .:.m ~: ~ ': ~ ' ' , ~ :.• . ° a~ S A W ~ c o °N w W o W° o=° e o ark ~ H~ ~: ~ ro.o :: ~' ' O ~i C N O O O e : n =° n o e o '.~: n: ° D~ O J S y N ~ A 7] -~ C O O S >> C N a ~' W F 1 -~ J O O O S S N y ¢~ `G v n v p g v 3 V v O v v v A U1 ~1 ~ ~G n S p n n~ C C ~ ~ ~G n n w m -I 3> S K 6 S ` n -i S O n N~ ° 3 ^ T -O r .Ni. N -O _ G < N J ~ -O T 'p O N y~ "O N J E .i ~? N 3 (p W p G (p O~~ ~ (O C~ C -O ~° (°v~ ~=~ 3, (n~ H r o '° .< °. C1¢F. ~ m -° ^ O N N S N IU O m^ ¢~~~~ S mmcsy= -N ' O N O¢ <'~m3~ J °. ¢ O 3 n~~ B ~~ o ^J °c F w 3 ~~a . O w o ¢¢~i N Da-O ~~i ~ m ~ ~' B. ~o ~ ~ ~ . ~~ was N o- ° ~. s. F ¢ y a~ . N~ J ~~ r o ~ o ~~ o w¢ ~ F ,~ N c' fn °' r" ~. - N d 'tea Q ~ °~ ~ a E, () m o o m w o °~ ~ y J C m 3 N a w m 3 m N () o f w O ,_, ¢ s ... N o N o c m ' =m°- 3030: ° °~o: (?» m°'° d m`o'm m w~~ ~~m`~ t°Jf =m¢ 3mm 3a m¢o o° N ~O Nao . Wa»^ 5~~ v,~ m~~ o.e3 0-0 ~U13 ¢p . ~ < o ~ c nNO w r°n so N ^ N w m' o m ~ atnJ ~w.P ° D Ww 2 -g o^ w'O y m' ¢Z ¢w C) J : ~ ~ m m C1 S ~ _ m c w ' ~0 _.m J v ~,-.s m J ~ „~ m m ~ . ~ f] ~~ ¢ `G vm °m ~ J .m aJ, ^< N N N n33 0my°ommm Sm . O j U ~ J N O N N [ ild -i m w S F f m~ n N O ..:. C ' o ° N ` 3 F o f f ~ S r 3 f. N c~ o~ N o 3~ J m `^ o m m~- o n . ~} m " ~ C w <-. s w, f w w ro °o ° N ° ~< ° y °-' ~ o ' m ~ c N 10 N C) ~ N ~ ¢ ~ c N ¢ C7 N J y ~ ~ ... w o m J .: "~ mm ` J G S J m ¢ N JJ3 3c n N O N W ~ - oo F y -o ~= Nc ~ r o ' mnN (o c . ^ ¢ ~ o f ' o~ ON v s d w N rv 3 n J TN - w w ~ N o J~ONS j y3 N N ~, o (gyp ° ¢ , H J w N. .~'y . N m o .J. VS O m' o w¢ ~ ~ C] c o 0 0 .~ O~ . ~b N ~° c N c N N~ o ¢ 'p w o JJj2w pj J 3 0 ~Nj D c ~ • ~:~.H .:.~.... ' y ~ ~o F ~ D3 T¢ o m° o-ocg:a~ w~ J x m o 3 0- m < n o - n^c'o ¢ N N ~a a o 3 n' w P ~, r 3 ' J J S O J `w N O ¢ G m Q Q 3 3 E -° ~. J¢ w N J O' N w T. ^ C . . ¢mw G m o W mNm~O~ 3 =wm°vo ZJ~ p wwc J ' w wT(ao :~cn yF~ ~a no r J o ~ mno ¢ o ~ m~ _so x oo$ y ~ w m ~ m a ° mx-ago ~ ' ~ ~ a m 3 g o ° { :: Ay. ': ~ O ~ ~. m N m B y ~ r n ~ ~ o ¢ ~ .: ~ : °. ,' .' w ..~ N f O~ N o °' m . n • -{ ~~ U `~ o H. ~ ~. ~ °- S J T p m N n ~ /1 y ^~. f N ~' n N ~' C v~ ^ w_ ~ O ~ J ^~ W J N l0 O N N_ y w `-^ °' ~ f0 N N S _`2. C 'p N¢ N 7 O .~ ¢ ~ N~ 6 C 0~ N O ^~. y y W N "O N~ ! N Ji ~. ~. J w (4 ~ N w w 3 N ¢ m a y C _ W S 0 J 3 ~ J W O N "" C .T \ JJ ~ O O O' J .' . Vi ^< ~ O O (O F . tp N ~ ~ O O W N O .~ N p ~ ~ S ~ w O ^ N °~ ...~ ~ N . ~ ~ wm ~ 0 w w s~ ~ '~' _ N =. y °"D y ~ ¢ '~~ m <_. N n m n~ °om F y^ w m`D~ O `^ ~ ~ e ~ . ~n ~ ~° w N N `w< (O O O y ~~ O. w¢ mss ~ ' N N ¢ N l0 S O m m m n w T 3 ^' 3 J 3 O ¢ 3 N ' N ~~ O COQ O C w N GI N C ~p .°-r O 3 ~ E. O 3 3 F O J Qfp j ~ y ~? N j N O w ~ `G N .... "O i O ' _' CJ j O 4' J 3~ V O . _ C N N N _ ~ T 3 O N 3 31 H (A m _ J S N gN Oda. S ~. J `< 3 ~ ~ d O '<3~ N O' N N m c ~ m o m. N ~ m y o ° m y CJ S N N ~ Q ~ N N O ( . c U a \/ a D r 0 C m m Z N ~ n O~ m ~O N m ~ ~ m pm zn D O Ill /I ~_ T1 a om N ~ J 0 J ~ 1 N O O N J N '''~':~:':~: C': .. _ ~ ~ ~ ww I ~ V! .: ~ z^^ m m D O 0 a- ~ O 'xm ~ ~ (X 3 J ~ ~ 1 Z O JJ N ~ r 3 r n ~ ~' . (T p~ w w w w j N N ~ S t~ tQ w . ~ °03 d~~ Wo Q DDFFxs~ D.J...a V m N x ~ .< ~ 2 0. 3 (/J D D C C Z° Jl ~ n`OG J ° ,y ~' . N O Q w? 5 - m 9 a 3 ~ '~ J p A A W N ~ c N ~~ Z ' ~ J .,_rJj W m W ~ 2 W a :: Q° P7 :I J Q ~~~ f0 N10 n ~ f y O C 1] d N~N~ :.~ D N N : 'yz.~n . WA n y ' J ' x ` y~ , ~ 'rs ~ ~ cJ v s!. ~' : :':y . ~: y Q . . ... .. n .~..~.~.'.........':~: a ia ro . ~ n a~ nW w Q:. ;: ~..... n ~ ~ ~ N 10 10 N ' ~ ~~~ ... g..~ ~...'.: r: to ~~ ro C> W ~ a a Z . e n ~ ~ ' : :,,: n:: v m v~ v v v v v v v m v v v v v v v w n T ~ T w 0 n Z D D J ~ J ~~ Cn ~ D T O y `G g~ w -t O V E N c y, v_ %^ w ° m -i i N? _ O N S w C w z n0 •-: O~ O. = 0 j d ~0 w~ O O ~' 3-w 3 j ° V~ a ~. ' - N (~ a R y 'O ~ m ^ o ~ 3 mo my ~ m ° v£ ? m < °-' n N4p ¢fny o~< Dm ~ o y J ~$ ~ y :mo m o 3 mow. n . . o `G J ~ ~ ~0 ~J_W_(.~oQ m¢n<Dc ~.~pm~ ` nrv'o' o c J D<~< Dw n n °'O o ` O o °O w v ° o Dmm Qnm o ~ tp f . . G ~ O y. 0 d ° J J 0; 3 y N D a a N a J N ~ '' . j 1 n -py N~~ N ~ y y m D .n p 0 N N y 3 N^ w N < ' J J N O n 'O w (O a N J °i - y fp C$ J o S [J 7 S~ 3 Q % J xmo S 3.3m vD ~~m ~=m O S a y io o m m n J ~. a T n s' n ~~~ ms m ~ J o o? c 3 D m ~ ~' ~ a z m a ~ D m _. ° °~~ m o d - ~. a m w s °' w c c a ~a coma ° sD~ py ~ ° c > >Zaa <.om ~xa ~my3° n m a ` moo T a'o m`° a ~~ : Q _~° o . Lrom Dan m g ~ D .a m y D o 3 ~ ° m 0° J = w s ~:°.o _ o ~ :',R7 .. s7 l° ~ o C ... N < mm -O oB. °"^ B.¢m ~?rn 3-ao o > > ~ < a T ~ ~ ~ y n N'm o O 3 c o o• y l Z F'3 O N ry ~ p C <O -O . r N O N ~ O Q O Ol N< W? y O. Q j N N ` ,~ ~ : ' N ° ~ro w °0 3 o ~ ^ ° O °0 ° 3 O 2 ~ mn C O v j °~m / i '~ ~: . o O N ~ m ~ N N~ ~' 7 O, N 0 j~ _N S. S m . (O `G 3 m . CIj . ry Q Q O N J O n ~ 0) S. ~ n y r S y a ..r ~ .. .'. P3.. N ~ °~ ~3D am ~ s =>> °m ~ m ` 5 w y o 'Q ~ -~' ~ ~ ~ ~ w w Q~ v ~o m ~ ~~ o ~ n ~ O Q 3 O ~ S bi ~ y T y m ~.~ t O C L ~ C y n 3 w D y~ n v ~ ~~ ~ ~ w w w a ? 3 ~ m J a °m o w a 3 n ~ w m $ o ~ a+ ,, . ~ J c w ~ z m m ti 3 m m m s °_ N . N O N Q D O~ N ~ O ~ v N n O ' O O C N G ~ ' C 0 ~ ~ ~ " 6 ~ w y w y N y N O Oil w N y a D r C m m z -a Q L m N n O -n m m n C r O z s r Q ,~ V/ N _~ m a om N V u ~ Q Q ~ ~ J 0 m 'O 9 9 ry ~. ' .a y ~ ~. m _ ~ ' n ~ . ` D ~ 9 N ~ O • W ~ V v Z D D D D D D 0 0 0 0 0 D D D 0^ O~ ~ . m m o 2 ~ d m °• n y 03 y>>>>>> OOOOO> j m'w lmy ~ ~~ nnn4a o 5 ' b m r m 3x m ¢ . .nzzzZZnn3 ° s OOOOO mv Om< °A P- .{j o ~.'. r 3 ? m m I/1 Z ZZ ZZZZZZ Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ut A W N+ O O^^ j O ~ Q D ~ ° N O ~ O m ~ W V O> Ot A W N + 3 ~ n~ :,rte. Ft]' : . ' r m m I o i o ~~ o~ i'•3 ~ . 0 p° . -1 S m O ~ O N~ ° ++ H S m 0 N ~ .~ 0 m 3 ° v •mG m > "O C ~ \ N N o m ~+, m~ m W N N O~ O @ m 3 °^ A O O W V+ OJ OJ (T _ N N "O N O C O 3 m L O ~ O :A ~. .'C `L L r C l N O ~ ~ J W N W O N V V O W J~ V W V O V N N O Od O O O N O N m ~ 'A2''. ~.. c O p T ~ '' w^ o o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A° 3 V A OI O O A N O O O o O O O m N ~~ Iti w s N m a m Wr = ~ m .v ~o ° a ~ a ~ m m ~5 t~ .d'. Iq 7 ~ ~ ,mom > w ?< ~o : ~ D ~ -m=g a 0 . :G : :~ .~ my d ~ ~~ y y m nti mC3 ~. _ : :m f~ y m .: . ~ 7 ~' . .. o Q~. ~> ~~~: ~.~~ .':'y f3 : ' ': ~ ~' a o w g~ D m 0 e m s ~ v y a - v v v v v v p v v v v v v v v v v v v v m n ' v' 3 n~ ° y m o -m ~ ' o T~ O 31m Os tnvL~m D~Nm~ZO V O w oa n °O sm n~ ~< o ~ m ° . ^ °.oa . wa g ~'~ .~w T - ~ :3 . ~ ~'o ~E 3.7 o y o n w °='w O~°~~ o¢~ororvo0o~"0"' ° _~+ sma me m m 1 ='°~ m m ° s3 D° m 0n' Oro "~ ~ ~.~~ c '°° 'oyomo o `°°°m mm°'v S3 _T a Oc ~~ m' m ~ m - $~ m o o n _ o D~ m 3 o N3a brow p N V'~,m o m m C m o o ~~~~ m W . Q • 5. v m ~ E o, n'o o ~ o . ro c ~ 3+ ° n, 0 3 m~ m= y o ?t -° m m Q. < ~ m1 E m ~ m nm m m 3 n ~0 m ~ ~ o N ~, C ~ y ~ m ~ ~ X T. ~ d j ° ~ 'o 'a ° mm -IDm 3 m nna C-a om ~ o v ~ , ± a m~~o s yoz m n a 0 3 o rv a ~~mo;wD o.ad~ m ~.,~yo?D m 'o E a ' =3" ` o ~ ' ~ a n ~~ o. Q5. - a ~ <o ~ ...~~~ m ° • N z a y ° ~ P C ' 3 J• ~ (7 C~ 3~~ O N m~ D 2J J%~ O. l° J~ m y m ~~ O y ryL c~oQ.an mo " m~O ~~~ m m cm+~m o dw .a D~°c ~~ m Q... mB vT. c ~ ~o •° -Oar ~~ [s[JJ y o .n g 3 m m f . n n o ' . ° c . o ~ c O m m m m~ v o a m <~~ o~ o H m 411 91 N .O N ° d m d p N .'S °~ d N J~ m ~ D O. < 3~~~~ Q N ~ m ~ ~ ~+ 0 6 j ~ G 3 O. O N ? ~ N~ Q (° ~ ~ O~ N N m ~ j np ~0 D O I'i '. ~ p me no 5 N ~ J ~~ 3 S 2 w - ~ nom +~-oo °-mot^3,-mo ~ -° ~ N ~O ,: "~ ' . N N y N N } .O y_ Oz ~ m °' O to 3 N O d _ w :' Vl _ m T° 4i N C O O N O m N F m j d~~ 0~ V C N~ O ~~ ro~QA~~. 9! 'm3~ Q c ~ m j m-•mn ~~ N ~ Sao m o V 3 O N 3 3 m V~~ . . y y ~ m m ~ o =pm o < Ov o' o c ° mm m o m' '~ ~ °-0 3 O O a 40 ^ m ~ ~ N "00 S ~ F m ~ m ~ 'o D Q O y 3 ° ° rv O > ° m O O C~ m m ]J Q m m O ~ (° N N (A W ~ 1p O O C N O ~ o ~ ~n m tA3 ~.3" ~ c c ~ o ~' n n~ ¢ O o m ° v m 66~ m s N ~~' 'm_ o = rom °~n~ ?~ ~ !O _m m s ~~~ r m F c m w 3 ~ w n a a r O C m m z '~ V/ O~ `mom ~O N Om Zn ~ C r ~a T~ D 7 ~^ /^' +/ n T ^a L/ om N ~ J 0 O Q + ~ ~ ~ "" o 0 0 0 0 o y' o o ~ F zp O O O O O O O J ~ q N O .gyp N ~" ~~ .Q m UO W O a N N ~ VOi N V O ~+ C1. ~ .~: N . y':.'.~. ~.~. r, - A n '; a 2 . ~ . N~ N < ~ N N O ~ ~: ~' O N ~ ~ C N N ~ ~ J T C A T~ N CJ J vmi v°i ~ := N ~G N ~ N C N W JJ 3 N S~ ~r . m m F n C1 p D n ~ N ~ m a a V ~ ~j m ~' '~ .2~ O m o T T 3 1 w T :, m N p- ? n m ~ 3 N d ~ :~ ~ ':~ ~ t W 3 J p p O O p 3 ~ T, N _ m `G p ~ f 3 m ~ T G m :l'~ ~.. :' Q10 n 11 ' S N O p N ~ `mG Q `mG p. ( Cl T' :f] ~ w~ m , p y Z o 3 . m o n a~ o 3 ~ ~ a x y ' . . '>D Y: 1:~.~1' :~^~'.. n ~~ :. m ~ ~ a ~ Q ~ = ~ m ~ ~, ~~ y n O r 3J N t~D ~ ~ O. C J O " R' N ~;~~ C y v . -~ y p d m' J O c ] ~ Jam ~. : 2 _ ~ m ~ . n . :,G p m T1 ' : . N ~. O y 41 O n p m J mr .~ .:'h!3. ~.. J ~ O 6 N n ^ J F J ! I .....:'...'.......' a n a n n a y y z ro - m 3 3 3 3 3 3 : A sO A O O O A O O O A 0 O O O O A C1 A 0 A O A J ~ ~: 7 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m s m S m g m T m s m >; m ~ m T m T m >• m ~Q m .G *r O' ~ m D D D ,., D ,,, D D o n o 0 o. g 0 n 'o - 0 a 'o - 0 n 'o - 0 n o - 0 a 'o - 0 n o' - 0 o. 'o - 0 no - 0 a 'o 0 c o' . .~ m: ~ m m ~ ~ w 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o- o- ~ .~~'~ :: ..:.:~.:7.: ~::> . o a ~G~" a a a a a a ~ a: Yro~" " o n ' m ,~ ~~3 ".3 w 'eo > . ~~ D O o W ~ ~ e N ~ "'~ ~ N e° ~ D roo ~ 'J! ~ ~ y n C y -' Y ~,.n:.:.:.:::.:. N } V ~ V ~ "~ v 'D ~p m E 7J a n ~p O C x 6 D "~ D '~ T V1 = = £ ° = y'i a (~ < f m 2 O N N ( p OD N ~ m f 3' F ~ ~. ° C . ~ O~ ' O~ °' m • ~F 'O ~ N ~ m m J O N m m m m m m w w m m m o m o p 5 _: J 3~~ m n c ~ O ? y @. w ~ 3 S ~ ° o~ ~.3 ' m o m~ 3 ' ~ ° 3 m ~ i° 3 ~o 3 m J m J (o G1 m f ° m ~° J m an d o -o g m m m y _ m - ,J, F m m J m n (o m n m J o . ' n ~° ~_ ~ m ~ _. J ~ ~ ~ s m m m c F y . _ N N m N N n N n m O N S. <. < m S J (7 m . m S » m Q - ' ~ N m N< N ~' m N ~2 ~ m S m _ ~. C S C° g C D C O C tT C 6 C n .° N N 3 ~~ O N m _~ CJ P O_ J m m n m °' ~O m° ~ N m N m N m N m N m x m °n m O w ry^ m ~» 7 F m ~ m ~ J °-' ° o ' ( J m o -`~. of x{ 3 3 3 3 3 ~ m m o m o , - ~ o- o' m~ --6 F 3 ° 5 `~ J ~ ~ -~ ~ m ~ o 0 0 3 n m m ( m o 9 _ m m m m m m x ° m ~ m B. ~ -° n m ~ m o- J m I ( J ~p - ~ _ p N µ m (D J W ~ ry m ~ O ~ m. d m m t^ f0 > >. d y yc : ~~ m N m N m N m N N 3 ~T~, m N O "O F m ~ ~ ~ O ~~ m m ~ ?. O :: Cam]. N N N N N C f0 3 S 3 S J n (~ m x 3 3 J° -. m~ ":'.2':'.'.':::':'. H g ~ v v g q o- 3 n E o~D V w n ~ F ~ o o w~ ry _ , , .p a 'o 'o 'o a ~ o c ~ ~ o ~° w °o -mm o C m m m D-° . : rJi ~ s x x x ~ v ° m w ' ° H m t_n m !? _2 m ~ = . ~ " ~ ~ m m ~°m m m m 3 ~ m n a _ ~° m n m C m m n ~ ~ N N N N N m y^ ~ ~ -. S° ny C T `~ m .-Q N n m"O ~yj{, : m m m m m o' mJ N ° (~ m m q ~ m J ~ n F w 3 m m : 4 J f ° ~s m °- c onCm w33 0 0 0 3 0 o z -' m .- m 4 m -m o ~ m a " p o ' w B a -o - a a a 3 ~ ~ N o H m - m m N m m m O <n N + ~1 n ~ N A O m y ~p C j ~ m ~ n y n (/J J -~n~ m m N n~ 6 V °- S ~ N O N ~ m 3 9 y N ~ m o; ~ mm 3 6 n j ~ .~ ~ p N J m fp 6 ~` N (/~ d ~ `G r m m i ~ C . m y ~ O 3 E ~ ~. ~ ~ N ? N ° m ~ ~ m m - m ~ 6 ~ m F O N :... ..'::..... ..': '. G 0 w n n D r T~ V O m m Z 0 ~ OT m Dm Jz /n. l ` =r ^~ y A A r~ i/ A n n n Jn l ^a L/ om N ~ J ~ Q O ~ O ~ 1 G N O m ................ ~ w m e O O O o :~:~z":Q''~'~. ~''' C+1' N N N N W O r N L . .. . - _ _ D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a O O wo o L7 n v m~~ 1 O V N mx vm ~ O :; ... ....... ~ N w n m m m~ r d d N~ ~ o~~ 3~ ~ y m' o 7...... N p m y o w N ~ ~ -y =' s u m S W ° w O n :~:~2: ~, : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ° m T v x o o J o a 3 o JJ 'w ~~ w °' y m 3 : : : : : : : :. ':';"j' m,.;.:.:.:.:. m m E N W S C o =J w ' ':':1/ p ~ . O C O . . o w ~ ~ w° ° ~ J c J ~: :~:~71:~.~r:~:~:~:~:~: ' y~ JJ w J 3 m n S 3 ~ ~1 ':':':':': :~:~3C?:: .~.....: s N N ~ m. C o °c N N (O n o ~ S< O ~ ( N °J m o S (O o N ..... /y~ ey;:~:~:~:~: J (IJ d ~ O ~ A ~ N N .W:fjf.:.:.:.:.:• ^ o o N y ~ d Q 3 0 -i " ' g ~ '' ~ .-.'.'.'.~ : : N N ~ C ~ 'H;~ ' ° O N - w ° w c c c c c ~ ~ 3 _ _ _ c c c c_ e_ c_ c_ c ;:::, ::~ qy'.~.~.~.~.:. is z m m A w m m ~o ~ m m ao m m >:":G~;:p:;:;:;:;::.: x ^ N C C C L C C C L C C C C C "~'('j~"~'~~ ':''m:. ...; ;. ~ ~ ~ i t i t i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~:':':~be'':`.':':':J:'i o p ~:::~:p:.5.;.:.;.:.; ~ z ~ ~ z ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ z ,~ 3::~:„~:: ss: ~:~ ~:::: ? ~ Z ' ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ Z ~ :: ~' '~:~::~. ~:~:~ D D D a a D D D D D D a a D D .r i °' '''''' ~: :: ~+N wa O'~ 7J <w WN °o 'OO oJ ° O OJ O o o 2 w w w N FJCm D ca'm ~m'S soD NO 31 ~2~'7J ~EV 0 ': w o ~ O <. n e w ~< o ° m ~. ~i o m ~' o g F< w N w n o- m a s 3 w s o'. °. N< <_. a "'~ o• o °o ` w a m o n .v m .o O~~ T i c ¢ 3 ~° F'o ' , : ° ~N F " m o ~ S ~< . ww c¢0 m ..w . G ° `°" ° 3 3' < 00 o ' 3 cw°1 ' $, w_ a o O ti~ C9 p~ ' m.~ N m . 'a ~ O N nm N m n -O _ '< w m F ~.J3Dw . No m ¢ o ao ~ o 5. n S S ~ ' : J O (O 3 p T = ~ O o N N O o , O< O = (~ O O n N N N w w (O N J F m o P-. Pi w a W P-r O » : ` y ~ J ~`^ ° ~o `~ D m ° f <. ° o w N`$. 130J! < s~ w' m.w w -19 -o o °: G-.a m N $ Q N w w ... #c y w N F y mm m? ww ~ ~°¢ 3'O 3a o c.o s5 o= < : . w w y O O' ° 6<~ U ~~ N N j JJ R . ~ j N ' F 0 `G J O J N N J (O O 3 n O ~' n O C N w N N "O J O m J J~ N y n ~ O w ~ ~ $ < y_ m ~ ~ . F D '~0 ~O OJ O. ~ ~ m o N w n ° d j (,~ ~ w n ° g ~ y ~ 3 m3 ~ o o m ¢ w ~ ~ 0 y ¢~'m m y ' D a ' ~, ' ~: ~: :::>':~:: ~~' ~ ~ ~ G~ m F . a ~ °' ~ww [n 3 `8 5 o c~ J O nm n w z ~ ~m :~:~r):;:;>;':';: .$ 3 E J¢ ¢ w O o $, ~ N <. C N J N c . . m . (p O N. Q N O' J y m C N m 3 ~ ° J . .'.'.C'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ; w O c -O J J o m n ° O n N m n w - ° $ 11 "O m'o N p n 3 w J Z N " ¢~ N 0 f/J ~ 3 m E D ~ O ~ °- (~ ~ J w ~' ~$ ~ O ¢ m :~:~77:':':':':;ii `NG N fNy f0 ° ~_ ~ N n f0 N J D O d~ J O. N (A N N J ~ W~ ~ O N S N N m~ N 7 Z m 6 N ?I j S. 0 N y N . ~;'; Z':';';';': ;'; Q w O S O ~ j a m N O t < w N .J. f] . i w J O .Tw EN C=~ O' - ~ C fp J N O= A pp~~ O O N N S F O¢ O f/1 N ~ O ry ¢ V R. ~° l0 "O ~ ~ '91] C :':'F3:':': :':':':' ••..• ~O C 3 w X 0 3 n ~. w N y O' O f0 n N ~ N w W~ ~ T O .Nr 3 O N w ~J O 3 J fJ v O~ O ry 3 G 'O O O 5. ¢ i ~ "O ° w J N~ ' N J ° w 'te » a o O 3 w N ~ .J W N N n nE (D N ~ ..: w my o n O J O ~ N owB¢ " O 3 ° o 1 .'.'..'.'.'.' I :: ~ m ~ m a D w ~~ O o a . m o o o °~ 1 3 o °m m m Z °- J Z `< ~ ~~-° ~ ~' :'itq:~:':':':':':' ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n N O_ '~ w N l 0 S N ~~ O~ 3 D C N y O 0 6 m ~ O J < D~ o w N CJ ~' ;. .. . . .. . F9 ~ ~ ~ j ° N m 'o. w 3 0 ~ c ~ ~ n ~ m F' fn m o (^ e a o `c' F . 9 < : : :^:~:~:Ji ¢ ~ ° w m' o N ~ O o',~ . ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ v ~ 5 m ~ o ~ . ~: ~ N-^ m a ~: ~: ~:'7~:~::~:J>: . _ , o ° a a mJ ° °" < -O 'o m o ~ B J J N o O w = =' m ~, "J O ° ~ ;';' iti;:~:~:~:~:~: ' O C N (1 ; ¢ m' ~. m o < m' 3 n -co m ~~ ~~ ~ m w~ rv 3 <_J m m B~ m~ ~'~'~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O ~< J OI ~ N O_ T N N O N J N F J Q N N n~ N N N J N O w w ° O n ~ w .'.y~;'; ~:~:'.~:~; S O 0 ~ oV~ ° c ° O O 2 Q N w ~< w 3 p O N ~ _ 3 ~ 3 S Ul 3 O 3 O y . 0 _ 3 3 w o m ~ 3 = 3 m r~ J o~ w J O m¢ ~ 3 ' ~ m'$ ~ a iJO 3' ° ~m ~ °w J ~ mm ~ -O O wpm m a ~ '° ^y ¢ m w m ~g n .'^w ~ o mNw 3 A ° o m3.o . 33 : . {yp N~ y ~ w ° N w y. n N~ (/J fi j N X 0 0 O y^ . o J N m z >> ~ am o' ~ ~tS :' y F N N = . w N w . f0 N n a 1 a r 'O 0 m m z O~ ~ O ~ T ~ ~ m p m Zn ~ C r D G /O/\~ Y/ IN Y/ m L7 m N ~ _ O N N O O ~ J 0 0 <:::r;::'::':':' z':o;:': ;:':' °: c~ : : : : : H ;; ; : : ; n:::::: a::::::: a:::::::::: : a~':::::_:: ~:::::: o ~~ ~ : m ~ : b:':':':':' ~ ~ o 3 ; z'':~"i: Q:'::':'.'.' N O N N . .:. . . ~. ':'TJ ' y o 3 , , , . . . . :~ :~:~:Y:.:~.;.;.;..: :~:':y'.~.':.;.'.~:~ o ~, 3 :: ::::F.?:t?1::::::::: ~ m N C'i.;.:.:.;. z. ~......_ ~ 3 ~ : z: ~ii: :i~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ o : ~:~~:'S : : : :~:: :: _ N „~: . . ~: ~ O O C D m c •~ t 3 ':~:ti7:;;d:;:;:;;; ?':::..;. ~ m m N .u m' t : ::.~..0:~:~:~:~:~~ Z :~ia'7':~::. ...' ' c c _ y _~. .. ^7:i'~i:i~i~ ~i~ ': : : ; : : : : : : : fp : ;:;.,; y ~j : : : : : : : ~: ~:;!tl:: C:::: ~::::: ~::: a n n ~ p; ...;.;.. : :::::::: : O ~: n:':::>::::::: Z go D N J J m 3'0 (7 C~ 3 n-tm-I O S- 3 3 0 ~: '.' . ~' n s D y N 3 w m ~ry ~ N ~ :. : 3 J O N N y y lJ N N N J p F .~ O : ;: C A N N ~ N (/I < O 0 ~Ap N 0~ ~ ' N N¢ ~ N W fy Q y ''N N ~ ~ w N m v qo- N Q .. ~ .ooN J m o-g~o O ~ O y~N J ~~ N m J N .~ r O N ~ ~ N ~ (~ > N ~ ~ 1~ j N E. N ~ ~ ~ ;. ': :':':':':':':': ' ~ V ~ i - y O ~ C N ~ ~ ' ':'::':':':': '. >"~ri:~>:~:~:~i:~ ~ m m g: ~ 3 o c n m ~ vi .~~ . :::::::::::::: G~::~:~:~:~:~: ~ ~ o - Q o ~ o :_ :: z::>:::::::: m m o ~ :: ''`~:':':'i:':'i ~ 3 ~ s = ~.. < N J ao ~ ':~: '~ 'I'I<:J<'1 N m ~ ~ m ...9 Q ~ ; .. VJ. ...... m J N w N o m m o m .~ C ^ :':~b:::;:;:;::.;; ~ J N N Q O ry N ': ::::: ~:':':':':':':' -o J j ^ ... D ~' N oo n ~ 3 : ~ ~ r N ~ [a N ~ ~ ~ c , o ; ~:':':~:':': : ~ ':': .~. y'.~.~.~.~.~.~. i ~ . N r O . ~ m ' J ~ a¢~~ ~ ~ y n ~ :: o o ~ a ~w o ~~ w ~ J O Nso a J 6~ m~ '~' O m o = 0 d o J ~O N J -~ N c y N N 1 < N S O -O < N N : I p a m N ~ ' O m 3 ~ V . . m 3 - - p a y ° m ~ o c q y OD ~ ~ n 1 O T m m n C r D D m r MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: ~9~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: February 07, 2008 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report -January, 2008 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of Januarv I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns III. ASPIIAI,T REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons N. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of--way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 0 New and repainted legends B. 550 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 62 3 92 6 4552 33 171 0 46 8779 R:4~.WiNTNN W.OACTRP'I Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 49 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compazedto 61 service order requests for the month of December. 2002 The Maintenance Crew has also put in 115 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 2008 was $ $37.577.48 compared to $2,230.00 for the month of December, 2007. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 17,387.59 $ 18,679.89 $ 1,510.00 cc: Dan York, Deputy Director of Public Works /City Engineer Greg Butler, Deputy Duector of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Principal Engineer - (Traffic) Amer Attaz, Principal Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) R:4~MNTAIMMOACTRPr STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of Jauuarv, 2007. DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNELBRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: Montelone Excavating Date:l-15-8 Gradin of Dirt # 999-5402 Service Level "R" Area's TOTAL COST $1,510.00 Date: 1-15-8 Jedediah Smith @ Temecula Pkwy Silt & Debris removal from culvert # 5401 TOTAL COST $4,156.00 Date: 1-17-8 Rancho Vista Rd. East of High School Shoulder grading to keep flow of water off street. # 5402 TOTAL COST $2,950.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Becker Engineering Date: 1-3-8 # 5402 Wolf Creek Dr. North of Antelope Place. R&R sidewalk curb & gutter to construct standazd #402 wheel chair ramp. TOTAL COST $6,730.00 Date: 1-17-8 Vallejo Channel Remove silt and debris from channel # 5401 TOTAL COST $14,523.89 CONTRACTOR: Becker Engineering - Date: 1-23-8 # 5402 Pauba Rd across from City Library Repair slope, clean ditches and hydro seed & replace silt fencing. TOTAL COST $7,707.59 Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401- $18,679.89 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 - $17,387.59 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 - $1,510.00 R:~MAINiARV~hIOACiAPT O y L O O) R 3 m ~ = D a =_ ~ IL m m m T m d d 9 N ~ i d a m D N a` Y Q. ~" ~+ d U o0 J ~ Q N m ~ Z O ~ F ~ o a ; Z N LL H - ~ oa~~ z ~ QOyLL a~ w Q F Q' N W: ~; J ~ V:~ W,N LLI O N t0 O Ny O O O O O O 19 1A N M OD O V O H O O W N M N H O A O V O h c W O M r t9 f9 O O O r O N O r b In O TW ~ O t q O OD M V O O N V M f9 H c O 0I M ~ ~ O O O fq A O W M N b f9 O O In 01 ~O H M N N M ~ ~; O O O N O M 0 0) V ~ M A f0 O O O O N O O A W 00 W H7 W '._ Y) G N o O r C lG V A M C! C M N W O O N O~ M O N N O ~ Y; A tp OD ~Q O i0 a N tD A l0 A N N t J-. V aD O) N O t0' M A W M O ~ Oi ~ Q r M N t9 f9 H N ~ ~ V to W N f9 W LL` I ~ a n: m G O ' L {. H_ r' N ! V '' `. ~p F ap ` . ° w r a'~i a ; ~ ' o I!U 3 m ' W W 0, of ~ ,, . „ ..° 0...,.. i U m, L' LL. , G w m l o r-, J, a', Q 4 c i ~ ~ V O O O O O A O M f0 A A V o0 0 0 om oo ul ao c c 0 0 ~~ O) 0 0 O O O N G f0 tp T N fp t"f ~ f9 t9 fR 19 ON b~ ~ MlAO b ~ M N H ~ ~ O ' ~ ~ ~ ~ O N M O O O O ~ M N fD N O Q ^ ^ ~ W N A r ~ W G a W Q U U O C Q 0I'6 R O R O O y c O~ O ~ ~ 00 C W } ' J ' J W N LL ~ LU D r2 ~ LL 2mL I Y ~ W I C W i O F p 3 3 J W N N F F W ~ U ~ W O W 3 N ~ y W J N N ~ ~ O ~ U J K W J W LL ~ W Z W m H W N p' U m Q O Q Z Q Q J = W ^ N N Q y J a N W W Q ~ W J C Z W N W K ? f C7 N W 2 ~ _ ~ = N N LL 2 N O. O O ~ W ~ Q N D F = ~ C7 K a Q W LL O A Z ' Z O ' Q f W M 41 U O (A Q R F p ~ 2~ Q j m d = ~ LL ~ ¢ o m m W` 1=~ 0'.'. ~; H ~;_ Q; W ~' O Ln V' ~ O O O M I~ r EfJ W O_ ~ O O ~ ~ W N ~ M r tn~O OM O O r W O ~ O fA V'O NO p ~ ~ Ln ~~ M OCOO N 00 r NNp~l~ln I~ ~ ~ O r I~ LL~ O r M r r OJ N O V V ~ O p ~ N ~ N ~ Np 00 V 00 - a0 NM Cfl00 ~ W O n OD CO ` p N p O ~ ~ ~~ p 'o (A; ~ ~ M ~ pp M m >. Q:' O 01 M O N ' Q ~ ~ N ~ N , % ~'} fA m :? ~ d m ~ o ~a W'. Z! ~Y- Vii: Q Iii:. Js N ~,l ~ , as a, o 3 0 U W J m ~ _ d g °c C` ~ ; O U is o Y~ W ~ N ~' O Q ~ Q; R' W ~' a z ¢ w ' = a3 - z y W LL H :i }' Np 00 C'O ~ O ~ co O N M 0000 m ~ l0 6) O) v Z ; Q' ~ ~ m ~ N O .- ~ r n ~ o ~ ~ M ~ N ~ O: M N '.Z!? ;a OD p ~ r 7" H W a i LL W w N O ' ~ c ~ u F ., ~ Z a ~ a W 'o E o~ ~ ' ~ in = U ~ ii N a~ ~ ~ c~ Z ~ °• cn ti~ ~ U ~ ~ ~~ U Q a Z Q ~ aa > 0 - g~ F-+'.. ~ m 1 c ~ L J fA y a } y Z ~ U a Q : ~ -° ~ m fA Z' ~ s.~cf /J H a~6i ~~ ~ E o~ ~~ H ` ' a i ~' ~ a~i m ~ U ~ ° N O' U acn ~ UO U U 5~0 J U Z O ~O ~ a0 Z Qc~ay ~c- ~~ ~ ~O ~ y N N ~ J ~ ~ J U N U H~ J (n U Q ^ ~ N (p ~ Q_ c m H 7 O~ U ~ Qc ~F ~ Z ~ s .a~F w a~'iaNi~ J ~F Z } ccc~iaa'i? = N ~ ~ J ~ w o ~p O *- (6O ~ ~ ~O UO ~ 3 NO rnD7~ a~ 2 ~ QU~H U . . C4fnH H I-I-H ~I- U p ~ (4WUI-~Z ~ N Q(AC~ O F CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 DA',P ~~ ~~ :~ ~ ,~. S. 1-2-8 ~~ y ~ ,, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ l ;~ ~f ug'a, A4 ;+., bf ,a a Zt zr4G~'~3~e ^i~s~U ~a ~i ~` ~ ~* ~~~~'. 5Y5 rv1?~NLfiI .% k.e larks ~u m1r., e ~c /.~Y~ City Wide b~ s ~ S O t+ v ~eyz,'.'+~~y, y ,eti .t 3 £ikivl u~°~] aL+~.~. Pothole repair '~ X ~' r~s ~f d 103 ''+,~~ P~~ %. ~ ' ~~ 6 d.. ~..`4~ 3 1-3-8 Los Ranchitos area A.C. overlay 777 4 1-8-8 City Wide Pothole repair 70 2 1-9-8 City Wide Pothole repair 35 2 1-15-8 Joseph @ Riverton A.C. overlays 1127 4.5 1-16-8 Nicholas @ Calle Medosa A.C. overlays 820 3.5 1-22-8 City Wide Pothole repair 82 Temp 1-28-8 City Wide Pothole repair 360 Temp 1-29-8 City Wide Pothole repair 128 Temp 1-30-8 Jacaranda R & R A.C. 400 10 1-31-8 City Wide Pothole repair 650 4 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 4552 TOTAL TONS 33 R AMA W'IA W W ICCMPLTD W SPHALT.RPR CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 ,,, zet~r ~n ~, `~ ~=DA`ls 1 1-2-8 ~~e ti ~4 ~ b_ ~~ ~ ~~" A~i r~ ~aW'~ ~~~~~" T p `~t~~~ ~ . City Wide i xin rvg ~ . ~a ~oti~9~~ CLEANED & CHECKED v~'C kJ'x ~L b~ ;~~ :~nE`,~~~~w~r~ 12 CATCH BASINS 1-8-8 City Wide Rain CLEANED & CHECKED 27 CATCH BASINS 1-14-8 City Wide Rain CLEANED & CHECKED 27 CATCH BASINS 1-16-8 Area #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS 1-17-8 Area #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS 1-22-8 City Wide CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 1-23-8 Area #5 CLEANED & CHECKED 31 CATCH BASINS 1-24-8 City Wide CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 1-25-8 City Wide CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS 1-28-8 City Wide CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 171 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 ~s , K W'f ~ ,'.',-.--"DA,TE~ -2-8 $ l "4 4~ 1 ~ I'v-. ~~~f~~^N~ .`V~. ~.~" <`'`;~ "" . 3d~ T e n~.;~ ..w YrMti.~a. ':A Rancho Vista Btwn Mar azita & Butterfield / e,cnm eb ~~ ~ LAS 7~tis ~ '~ .~.s~:t~t ~d'~ ~ y!F~ t R H~~P~. :. M12, REMOVED ...5 H;1t~ 463 x$yt µi`A ~-'a.' rf k kt '„" t W l M * ~.~ ty { S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-2-8 Pechan a P Channel REMOVED 1375 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-3-8 Rainbow Creek/Rusfic Glen azea REMOVED 125 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-3-8 Redhawk area REMOVED 67 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-7-8 Vail Ranch REMOVED 22 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-7-8 I-15 S/B Overland bride REMOVED 381 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-7-8 27624 Jefferson REMOVED 34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-8-8 Lon Rid e & Rock Bluff REMOVED 78 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-8-8 Mar arita Area N/O Winchester REMOVED 23 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-9-8 Pechan a Pk S/o Mira Loma REMOVED 134 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-9-8 RCRD Butterfield Sta e REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-11-8 Temecula Creek Pala Pazk REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 Old Town azea REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 Mira Loma Edison Plant REMOVED 196 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 Taz et Center REMOVED 84 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 Ynez Ct. Channel REMOVED 162 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail REMOVED 124 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-14-8 I -1 S F N & SB REMOVED 96 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-15-8 Redhawk Pkwy Overland Trail REMOVED 26 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-16-8 27520 Ynez REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-16-8 Mar arita Pio Pico REMOVED 1 I S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-17-8 Temecula Elementa School REMOVED 132 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-18-8 Roi au h Sanderlin REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI A~MAMTAIN~WKCMPLIDIGRAFFIT~ r;.DAT'~`.~~- 1-18-8 ~~ ~a~~,. ..`'~s ~' ".%`X .QCA. Q . ~~w'~v:l ~.`~:» ~' RodeWa Inn Front St. '~ ,;~~F, . r. A~'z°. ..,, ~`+z REMOVED ~ K ",,.. .~'~,t ~i~ ~ '`~~ ~_< 109 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-18-8 Redhawk Bride REMOVED 150 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Butterfield Sta a Brid e REMOVED 151 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Lon Valle Rd azea REMOVED 217 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Mira Loma Edison Plant REMOVED 65 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Via Las Colinas REMOVED 82 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Santa Gernudis Creek REMOVED 457 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-22-8 Number/Lon Va1leyArea REMOVED 279 S.F.OFGRAFFITI 1-22-8 La Serena REMOVED 29 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-23-8 Winchester w/o Nicholas REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-23-8 Redhawk area REMOVED 56 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-25-8 Em ire Creek REMOVED 66 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-28-8 Preece Ynez REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-28-8 Vail Ranch REMOVED 11 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-28-8 Via Paseo Del Sol REMOVED 23 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-29-8 Taz et Center REMOVED 156 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-29-8 Winchester behind Taco Bell REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-29-8 Winchester Brid e REMOVED 310 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-29-8 Rancho Vista Via Vistana REMOVED 64 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-30-8 Via Consulo Flood Channel REMOVED 1853 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-31-8 Ave Gazca REMOVED 73 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-31-8 Em ire Creek REMOVED 767 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-31-8 42215 Number REMOVED 22 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 8779 TOTAL LOCATIONS 46 ALMA W iAA~ W ICCMPLTDIGRAPFITP O WW uW lu'~ 11 O O 0 N a U a ~ b'i F .Si y ~ ~ G G [~ ~ ~, ~ .w T ~ a ;; o T W ~+ ~ > U ~ w~ Q~ ti ti Q~ O z q w~ d ~ ~F d 0 °~' ~ v ~, ~, ~,' ~ .. ~ a ~ w ~ Q ~ ~ ti Q rn O Z A 0 Z U O a w y a J 7 Z 7 ~ ~I ~ T J_ Q Q W LL 2 U W O O L ~ ~ N ,--i ~' o~ `'" w ++ +' p H Q - ~I F" r~ U s5 3 d v G V 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 rG~1~OMr01I~LnMr01~1nMrO~l~bMrO1P H1Mr Oa~~~d'MMMMMNNNNNrrrrr CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 DtiTE R~C'D z { ~' ~~ v ,~ ~ t , ~ ~ ` -0 ~nkt LOCATTQIV ': i +, ~ 3 ~ ~r~r ~ y3~ 1 F ~ ~i~' ; ARE UEST~ ` ~ f tDA wO COMPLETED,`" ~~ ~._,a. .,~.. 1-3-8 41781 Vardon Tree T*imm;ng 1-3-8 1-3-8 42888 Via Alhazna Pothole 1-3-8 1-3-8 32283 Corte Las Cmces Graffifi Concern 1-3-8 1-3-8 Joseph Road Debris removal 1-3-8 1-4-8 44785 Mazzi Ct Tree concern 1-4-8 1-7-8 Pechanga Pkwy Trench failure 1-7-8 1-7-8 N/B Mazgarita Tree limbs down 1.7_g 1-7-8 39120 Liefer rd. Road grading 1_7_g 1-7-8 Via Las Colimas Muddy water in street 1-7-8 1-7-8 29915 Mira Loma Standing water 1.7.8 1-7-8 42081 Paseo Rato Del Sol Shoes on light pole 1-7-8 1-7-8 42110 Teatree Dr. Tree trimming 1.7_g 1-8-8 Liefer Rd. Road grading 1_g_g 1-8-8 Nicolas Rd Water in riverbed 1-8-8 1-8-8 41284 Bravos Ct. Lost keys - 1_8_g 1-9-8 41925 3`' St. Repair alley 1-9-8 1-10-8 Pauba @ Via Rami Pothole 1-10-8 1-10-8 39310 Kimberly Lane Road grading 1-10-8 1-11-8 27493 Dandelion Ct. Tree removal 1-11-8 1-11-8 30533 Moontide Ct. Tree trimming 1-11-8 1-14-8 32579 Via Perates Street repair question 1-14-8 1-15-8 Pujol @ Main St. Raised sidewalk 1-15-8 1-16-8 30209 Sierra Madre Debris removal 1-16-8 1-17-8 Joseph rd Debris removal 1-17-8 1-17-8 Via Terino Hole in ROW 1-17-8 It\MAM'rAIMWRKCOMPLID\SORS\ RECD -18-8 ° ru e ', r ° - ~ s+aa r fr1 ,~ aw ~ r ~ ,LOCATTON¢ z 3r "~ ,A. .. . ~ .... . .. . ... . . . ..,~_. n...r..... E.. 30392 Milano Rd e ups " p ~~ ~ EF ~+ •? ~'4i 1r r ° it >~~' 4 ,RE J T7E5`T ~ ... , .,. ~~, ..i Tree removing id d a~+ ~ >~~~T;E WORIf COl~T.ET~D ~~, ~.. 1-18-8_.., 1-18-8 ViaToreno Sidewalk repair 1-18-8 1-22-8 40244 Dopomore Ct. A.C. repairs 1.22.8 1-23-8 44775 Cupa Ln. Tree trimming 1-23-8 1-24-8 32981 Patemo Tree trirmming 1-24-8 1-24-8 DePortola Sand removal 1-24-8 1-24-8 Pechanga @ Deerhallow Pothole 1-24-8 1-24-8 33654 De Portola Debris pickup 1-24-8 1-25-8 Nicole Ln S.N.S. missing 1-25-8 1-27-8 Ynez @ S.D. Smith Pothole 1-27-8 1-28-8 43455 Business Pk Dr. Clogged storm drain. 1 28 8 I-28-8 La Serena Sand removal 1.28_g 1-28-8 30600 Santiago rd. Sink hole 1_28_g 1-28-8 Ynez @ Santiago Pothole 1-28-8 1-29-8 Leifer rd. Road grading 1-29-8 1-29-8 Calle Cedral Sand removal 1-29-8 1-30-8 Green Tree Sand removal 1-30-8 1-30-8 Anza Rd. Sand removal 1-30-8 1-30-8 27507 Jimson Cir Tree trimming 1-30-8 1-30-8 31009 Corte Arroyo Vista Tree trimming 1-30-8 1-31-8 Moraga Debris removal 1-31-8 1-31-8 Rainbow Cyn Rd. Tree trimming I-31-8 1-31-8 Sycamore Terrace Apts. R.C.C. repairs 1-31-8 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 49 a:veuaarnunwxxco~Lrnvsoxs~ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 `! a~,.A ~ E If yti"C ^'.i~'f{h 1v.Y'-k''l4'x.'-...i ~P .' R.y~'{'£'.. {f, .t ~^l ^n;. V Z' t ~f > °~r ''LOG~~: ~ ; ~ ' tea, :°TY lR ~i ~ ~ :x .. ~~ ~' i' ~~ ~ '~ ~. ~ ~ CF ^.E,. z ~ , , i ~?~ ~ss R ~s m~o~S ' ~ ,, ~, ~ S ~ r . . _ , ,,, . , ~ , .~ , xwt~ F Replaced 5 Delineators 1-2-8 Diaz RCRD Replaced R2-25 1-2-8 Lon Valle Yukon 1-3-8 RCRD Ho e Way R laced R4-7 1-3-8 Camino La Torre Corte Florecita Re laced Rl-1 1-8-8 Ci Wide Re laced4 Re aired2 1-9-8 Diaz/Rancho Cal Rd Installed 3 C.H. Du 1-9-8 Ci Wide R laced 5 Re aired 2 1-11-8 City Wide Re laced 5 R aired 1 1-15-8 City Wide Re laced 4 R aired 4 1-16-8 City Wide R laced 2 Re aired 5 1-18-8 City Wide Re laced 2 R aired 1 1 22 8 City Wide R laced 5 R aired 6 1-23-8 City Wide R laced 8 Re aired 40 1-24-8 City Wide Re laced 9 Re aired 6 1-29-8 City Wide Re laced 4 Re aired 5 1-31-8 City Wide R laced 6 R aired 20 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 62 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 3 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 92 R:NL1W TA[N~WKCMPLTD~S[GNS\ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS /STRIPING MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 iZ ~~` P D~~E 1-10-8 } I ~'4 +~"' ,~' ~1'vTAY`I '~.tM1l `~y°44K li ) CI f I ~'~ S {i~~i"'~" fn' ve ( / ~ ~.; i~° F /AS e^' ~ ~~yi f F ~~a!r...yi.x[it.d{~V.lY~A"fYLi.egV~W:O4m~d ~~ir~tvi. % City Hall f Y 9.14x", 5 t. A d~~~ S~ N d`f ~ L. k'. `~11C r & 74R'nu~5..t.,u.r Repainted 550 L.F. Red curb TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 550 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF JANUARY, 2008 4ry ~f1TE. ~ 1 .... 1-15-8 ~4'S~dP~H>'V ~ 1 ~~I+~HfiY TR' J k~l y~~?f 1V -' dx ~' r ,.z °~Nf r ~z~~~s;~ ~" DLO ~N`~~ ~ r~ ~5< ~t n .5 s.., i +4w~in,.nkYo.M4 ~ 5....x`.4 .<'T.... 4.r City Wide s )' b '~1~,~ ~ p ~! n TRIMMED k:5 gi't_- F ~ 'i l (G 3 "A x k , ~~'rTE~~ ors 6 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRINIMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRID~IIvIED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRINIMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRINIMED R.O.W. TREES TRINIMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TRINIMED R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 6 R:NLllNTAIMWRKCOMPLTD\TREES