Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05272025 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 27, 2025 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the potential sale of approximately 3.64 acres located at the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Diaz Road, along with a portion of adjacent right of way, owned by the City (APN 951-021-989). The parties to the negotiations for the potential sale of the property are Alitra, LLC and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for the City of Temecula are Aaron Adams, Kevin Hawkins, Luke Watson, Betsy Lowrey, Christine Damko, and Maricela Marroquin. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment for the potential sale of the property. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is significant exposure to litigation against the City. The subject property is 41333 Armada Drive, Temecula (APN 943-090-016). The property owners are Fernando Jorge Santos and Renee Santos. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Brenden Kalfus INVOCATION: TBD FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Brenden Kalfus ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation of California Park & Recreation Society Award of Excellence for Marketing and Communications to Community Services Department Social Media Team BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission Page 1 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images maybe displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda 2. 3. Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Attachments: Agenda Report Approve Action Minutes of May 13, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of May 13, 2025. Attachments: Action Minutes Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Page 2 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands 4. Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-06 Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to Repeal and Replace Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) LongRan Range Project No. LR25-0068) (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2025-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.23 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(H) Attachments: Agenda Report nrriinnnre 5. Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-07 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Zoning Code Related to Bedford Court Project (APN 922-210-042)(Planning Application Nos. PA23-0280, PA23-0204, PA23-0197, PA23-0198, and PA24- 0348) (Second Reading,) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.2025-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE XVII (BEDFORD COURT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 16) (PA23-0280) TO CHAPTER 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT) TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM HIGHWAY TOURIST (HT) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 3 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 6. 7. OVERLAY 16 (PDO-16) ON A 1.88 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING MAP Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance Exhibits Adopt Resolution Approving the Statement of Investment Policy and Delegating Investment Authority to the City Treasurer Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER Attachments: Agenda Report R eenhitinn Exhibit A - Policy Approve Agreement with Western AN, Inc. for the Purchase and Installation of Audiovisual Equipment in City Facilities Recommendation Attachments: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Western AN, Inc. for audiovisual equipment in City facilities for an amount not to exceed $557,554.50; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, or $55,755. Agenda Report Agreement 8. Approve Agreement with T.Y. Lin International for Hi6wav Plantins and LandscaninLy Design Consultant Services for the I-15/French Valley Parkway IMprovements - Phase II Highway Planting, PW 16-01 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the agreement for highway planting and landscaping design Page 4 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 consultant services with T.Y. Lin International in an amount not to exceed $168,113 to provide continued construction support for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II Highway Planting, PW 16-01; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $16,811, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Project Description 9. Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Pickleball Courts, PW21-03 Recommendation That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Pickleball Courts, PW21-03, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the performance bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 100% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release Maintenance Bond Project Description Project Location RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 5 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 10. Approve Action Minutes of May 13, 2025 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of May 13, 2025. Attachments: Action Minutes 11. Set Public Hearing to Approve Temecula Community Services District Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Recommendation That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR Page 6 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Preliminary Engineer's Report CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, June 10, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 7 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 12. Approve Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Adopt Fiscal Year 2025-26 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community_ Services District and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-30 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. SARDA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2026-30, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING Page 8 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 Attachments: Agenda Report Transmittal Message Resolution - City CIP and Budget Resolution - TCSD AOB Resolution - SARDA CIP and Budget Resolution - City AOB Resolution - Schedule of Authorized Positions and Salary Schedule Schedule of Authorized Positions Salary Schedule Resolution - Appropriations Limit GANN Appropriations Limit Page 9 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 13. Adopt Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps for the City of Temecula Prepared by the State Fire Marshal Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Prior to consideration of the proposed ordinance, ask the City Clerk to randomly select Mayor Kalfus, Council Member Stewart or Council Member Rahn, pursuant to Section 18705 of the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, to achieve a quorum for this agenda item, since these three Council Members own residential property in the proposed Fire Hazard Severity Zones and three affirmative votes of the Council are required by State law to adopt the ordinance; and 2. Introduce an ordinance entitled: Page 10 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND ADDING CHAPTER 15.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption Frequently Asked Questions BUSINESS Any member of the public may address the City Council on items that appear on the Business portion of the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 14. Award Consultant Contract to De Novo Planning Group for Comprehensive General Plan Update Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve an agreement for consultant services with De Novo Planning Group in the amount of $1,756,847, for the preparation of a Comprehensive General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and Program Environmental Impact Report; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $175,684.70, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement General Plan Update Process & Timeline CIP Budget Sheet 15. Receive Presentation Regarding Alternatives to Evening City Council Meetings (At the Request of Mayor Kalfus) Page 11 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council receive a presentation regarding alternatives to evening City Council Meetings and provide general direction regarding the same. Attachments: Agenda Report DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (RECEIVE AND FILE) 16. City Council Travel/Conference Report Attachments: Agenda Report Itineraries 17. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Planning Activity Report 18. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Monthly Report 19. Police Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report - March and April 2025 20. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY MANAGER REPORT Page 12 City Council Agenda May 27, 2025 CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, June 10, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 13 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City's website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 13, 2025 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council convened in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the acquisition of certain property interests, including permanent easements and temporary construction easements on three properties described below in connection with the off -site public street, utility, drainage and related improvements for Vincent Moraga Drive, Rancho California Road and Western Bypass Road required for the Altair Specific Plan Community ("Project"). The negotiators for the City are Ron Moreno and Anissa Sharp. The negotiators for the respective real property interests are set forth below. (i) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 28481 Rancho California Road in the City of Temecula (APN 921-281-011). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 5,572 square foot permanent easement, an approximate 75 square foot permanent easement for water utility purposes, and an approximate 3,757 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of eighteen (18) months. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owner GGG Partnership, LP. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. (ii) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located in the City of Temecula (No Situs Address) (APN 921-280-002). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 1,016 square foot permanent easement and an approximate 427 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of twelve (12) months. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owner An Bang Luo (formerly SPX Investment, LLC). Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. (iii) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 28545 Felix Valdez Avenue in the City of Temecula (APN 921-281-006). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 402 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of twelve (12) months. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Richard M. Alvarez and Linda Lopez -Alvarez. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION EXPOSURE. The City Council convened in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice of its City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency. CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Mayor Brenden Kalfus INVOCATION: Buck Longmore, Retired Firefighter FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Brenden Kalfus ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamation for Bike Month Presentation of Proclamation for Water Safety Month Presentation of Proclamation for Public Works Week BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Fire Department (CAL FIRE) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Laurel LaMont PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Kathy Sizemore (Item #14) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR • Danielle Collins • Jeff Comerchero (Item #17) Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Rahn, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. Approve Action Minutes of April 22, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of April 22, 2025. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. Approve City Treasurer's Report for the Period of March 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's report for the period of March 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025. 5. Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-05 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to Allow for an Auto Mall (10 Acres or Greater) as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Community Commercial Zoning Designation (LR24-0458)(Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.2025-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR AN AUTO MALL (10 ACRES OR GREATER) AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) 6. Set Public Hearing to Approve Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES AND ON COLLECTION RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 7. Approve Amendments to Agreements for Federal and State Legislative Consultant Services with David Turch and Associates and Townsend Public Affairs Recommendation: That the City Council approve the following: 1. Second amendment to the agreement with David Turch and Associates for Federal Legislative Consultant Services, an increase of 91 8. 9. 10. $198,000 for an additional three-year term, for a total agreement amount of $594,000; and 2. First amendment to the agreement with Townsend Public Affairs for State Legislative Consultant and Grant Writing Services, an increase of $180,000 for an additional two and a half -year term, for a total agreement amount of $396,000. Approve Title VI Plan and Program Pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Riizhts Act of 1964 Related to Federal Fundingfor or City Services, Programs, and Projects Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A TITLE VI PLAN AND PROGRAM PURSUANT TO TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 RELATED TO FEDERAL FUNDING FOR CITY SERVICES, PROGRAMS, AND PROJECTS Approve Joint Use Agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District for Use of Margarita Recreation Center Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Joint Use Agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the Margarita Recreation Center. Approve Enterprise License Agreement with ESRI for the ArcGIS Suite of Software Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve an Enterprise License Agreement with ESRI for the ArcGIS Software suite in an amount not to exceed $75,635 per year for three years; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders of up to 10% of the annual amount, or $7,563.50 per year. 11. Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Murrieta Creek Trail Solar Lights. PW21-13 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Murrieta Creek Trail Solar Lights, PW21-13; and 4 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. 12. Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Interim Main Street Parking Lot Improvements, PW 17-15 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Interim Main Street Parking Lot Improvements, PW 17-15, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. RECESS: At 6:17 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District meeting. At 7:57 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 15. Approve Amendment to Fiscal Year 2024-25 User Fee Schedule Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED USER FEE SCHEDULE, INCLUDING BUILDING AND SAFETY, PLANNING, LAND DEVELOPMENT, FIRE PREVENTION, POLICE, AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND MAKING RELATED DETERMINATIONS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 16. Introduce Ordinance Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to Repeal and Replace Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) (Long Range Project No. LR25-0068) Recommendation: That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2025-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.23 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(H) Approved the Staff Recommendation (3-2): Motion by Kalfus, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected approval with Rahn and Alexander opposing. 17. Approve Resolutions and Introduce Ordinance Related to Bedford Court Project (APN 922-210-042) (Planning Application Nos. PA23-0280, PA23-0204, PA23-0197, PA23-0198, and PA24-0348) Recommendation: That the City Council conduct the public hearing, adopt the following resolutions, and introduce the following ordinance: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BEDFORD COURT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.88 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 38924 (PA23-0204) TO DIVIDE ONE EXISTING PARCEL TOTALING 1.88 ACRES INTO TWO PARCELS AT THE SOUTHWEST END OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) 6 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PA23-0198) TO ALLOW A CAR WASH AT THE SOUTHWEST END OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PA24-0348) TO ALLOW A RESTAURANT DRIVE-THRU AT THE SOUTHWEST END OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA23-0197) TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STRUCTURES TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 4,546 SQUARE FEET AT THE SOUTHWEST END OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) ORDINANCE NO. 2025-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE XVII (BEDFORD COURT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 16) (PA23-0280) TO CHAPTER 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT) TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM HIGHWAY TOURIST (HT) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 16 (PDO-16) ON A 1.88 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN: 922-210-042) AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING MAP Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. F] BUSINESS 18. Receive Presentation Regarding City of Temecula's Workforce Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2561 Recommendation: That the City Council receive a presentation regarding the City of Temecula's workforce vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts pursuant to Assembly Bill 2561. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 19. Receive Presentation from Cybernetics Company, LP dba Infrastructure Management Services and File Technical Pavement Management Program Update Report Recommendation: That the City Council receive a presentation from Cybernetics Company, LP dba Infrastructure Management Services and file the technical Pavement Management Program Update Report. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS The City Council approved the placement of the following topics on a future agenda: 1. Alternatives to Evening Council Meetings (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney stated that Council held a closed session for the two items listed on the Agenda. For the first item concerning negotiations for acquisition of real property interests for the designated properties on Rancho California Road, Vincent Moraga Drive, and Western Bypass, the Council: 1) Approved revised appraisals; 2) approved just compensation; and 3) authorized the Staff to make offers to the property owners. For the second item concerning potential litigation exposure there was no reportable action under the Brown Act. ADJOURNMENT At 9:11 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 5:00 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Tricia Hawk, Finance Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $4,829,422.57. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/26/2025 - 05/09/2025 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 3,937,046.87 05/08/2025 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 892,375.70 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 5/27/2025 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 4,829,422.57 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18131 4/23/2025 4238 3 SIXTY FIVE FRAMERS Refund: Rental REFUND: TVE2 RENT: CMO Credit Card 375.00 304163 5/1/2025 1772 ADAME LANDSCAPE INC S25468 PARKING GARAGE SWEEPING/CLEANING: PW Printed Check 540.00 304164 5/1/2025 1783 ADVANTAGE MAILING 230128 PRINTING: ACTIVITY GUIDE: TCSD Printed Check 35,082.92 18129 4/18/2025 1842 AFFORDABLE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 1,455.00 18129 4/18/2025 1842 AFFORDABLE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 244.00 18129 4/18/2025 1278 ALBERTSONS PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD P Card 32.59 304165 5/1/2025 1236 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1215838 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 702.69 304165 5/1/2025 1236 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1215957 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 615.97 304165 5/1/2025 1236 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1216078 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 605.92 304165 5/1/2025 1236 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1215684 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 240.65 605981 5/1/2025 1512 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES 28206 PIANO SERVICES: THEATER: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 EQUIPMENT: CODE ENFORCEMENT: BLDSF P Card 1,216.90 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 EQUIPMENT: CODE ENFORCEMENT: BLDSF P Card 64.64 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 718.04 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 657.09 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 288.05 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 30.87 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 10.86 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: TRAFFIC: PW P Card 71.31 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: ECDEV P Card 45.39 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE P Card 90.85 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE P Card 84.70 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE P Card 25.15 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE P Card 22.42 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 57.14 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 33.66 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 26.87 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 26.27 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 18.31 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 14.45 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR P Card 9.77 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 126.41 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 78.30 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 21.73 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: STORMWATER: PW P Card 23.06 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: STORMWATER: PW P Card 20.24 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 47.46 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 14.02 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 267.08 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 71.72 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TVE2: ED P Card 39.21 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS: HR P Card 187.75 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card 136.49 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card (136.49) 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 2,060.81 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 131.97 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 6.24 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: STREETS: PW P Card 78.06 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SOCIAL MEDIA: ECDEV P Card 40.17 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 782.97 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 706.82 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 617.42 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 527.42 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 165.29 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 260.98 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 228.36 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 165.88 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 56.00 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 28.16 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 22.16 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 20.65 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 15.21 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 408.24 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 81.51 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 46.75 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 5.10 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: CITY PROMOTIONAL: CMO P Card 369.24 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: EXPLORERS: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 978.72 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 121.12 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 60.82 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 54.36 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 39.59 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 16.79 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 THEATER STAGE LIGHTING: THEATER: TCSD P Card 364.26 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE: TRAFFIC: PW P Card 522.87 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE: TRAFFIC: PW P Card 164.13 18129 4/18/2025 1418 AMAZON PC041625 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE: TRAFFIC: PW P Card (30.87) 605982 5/1/2025 1418 AMAZON 1 NLJ-JK6F-DDX3 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY CLERK EFT Posted 42.22 605982 5/1/2025 1418 AMAZON 1G1P-7H4X-7PXC SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: EM: FIRE EFT Posted 179.40 606040 5/8/2025 1418 AMAZON 1K1K-7TD3-L36V OFFICE SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCEMENT: COMDV EFT Posted 144.41 606040 5/8/2025 1418 AMAZON 1C7C-LWNL-77W3 SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD EFT Posted 912.09 606040 5/8/2025 1418 AMAZON 1C7N-7DCD-1CHD SUPPLIES: CRC AND SUMMER DAY CAMP: TCSD EFT Posted 279.53 18129 4/18/2025 4223 AMERICAN DIESEL PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 166.39 606041 5/8/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 79449 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 1,839.13 605983 5/1/2025 1080 AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS 22770207 LIFEGUARD CERTIFICATIONS: TCSD EFT Posted 448.20 18129 4/18/2025 200 AMERICAN SWING PRODUCTS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 179.44 18094 4/7/2025 1766 APPLE.COM 0547 EQUIPMENT: CANYONS & GREAT OAK CONFERENCE: ITSS Credit Card 1,093.33 18095 4/7/2025 1766 APPLE.COM 3101 EQUIPMENT: ITSS Credit Card 2,007.91 605984 5/1/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 20081794 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 96.52 605984 5/1/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 20081806 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 69.60 606042 5/8/2025 1293 AQUA SOURCE INC 405650 POOL TEST REAGENTS: AQUATICS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,997.77 18129 4/18/2025 200 AQUAFINITY PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 169.28 18129 4/18/2025 200 AQUAFINITY PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 71.02 606043 5/8/2025 2917 ARJONA GLORIA Perf: 04/18/25 SETTLEMENT: BRAZILIAN & LATIN JAZZ 04/18/25 EFT Posted 1,088.50 18129 4/18/2025 200 ARMS PUMPS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 1,225.75 18129 4/18/2025 4060 ART SIGN WORKS INC PC041625 CUSTOM SIGN FOR PD: PWFR-11 P Card 1,262.59 304166 5/1/2025 2442 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL 20210169.02 - 27 PA22-0105 TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL Printed Check 325.00 304166 5/1/2025 2442 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL 20240048.01 - 9 PARKER RIDGE CEQA REVIEW PA23-0497 Printed Check 398.75 18129 4/18/2025 1170 AUTO PARTS PROS LLC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 31.12 18129 4/18/2025 1170 AUTO PARTS PROS LLC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: STREETS: PW P Card 107.00 18129 4/18/2025 1170 AUTO PARTS PROS LLC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: STREETS: PW P Card 50.10 18129 4/18/2025 200 AYRES HOTELS PC041625 LODGING: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 386.96 18129 4/18/2025 200 AYRES HOTELS PC041625 LODGING: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 348.26 18129 4/18/2025 200 AYRES HOTELS PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 25.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 AYRES HOTELS PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 24.09 18129 4/18/2025 200 AYRES HOTELS PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 23.01 18129 4/18/2025 200 BADGEANDWALLET.COM PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 1,968.60 304167 5/1/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2039020109 BOOK COLLECTION: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 274.26 605985 5/1/2025 1810 BARCODES ACQUISITION INV7524564 IT AND RM: CARD PRINTER: HR EFT Posted 2,446.86 606044 5/8/2025 4155 BEACON ECONOMICS LLC 2005595 WORKFORCE ANALYSIS REPORT: COMSP EFT Posted 3,000.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 BEST BUY PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SOCIAL MEDIA: ECDEV P Card 924.35 606045 5/8/2025 2935 BETTS KENNETH 1900.107-1910.108 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 6,098.40 605986 5/1/2025 1980 BGP RECREATION INC 4075.103'25 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 245.70 304168 5/1/2025 1264 BIO TOX LABORATORIES 47328 PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF: PD Printed Check 3,180.52 304168 5/1/2025 1264 BIO TOX LABORATORIES 47327 PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF: PD Printed Check 1,776.38 304168 5/1/2025 1264 BIO TOX LABORATORIES 47392 PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF: PD Printed Check 517.96 18129 4/18/2025 2773 BOARD AND BREW PC041625 SUPPLIES: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS: HR P Card 44.56 18129 4/18/2025 2773 BOARD AND BREW PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: PLANNING COMMISSION: COMDV P Card 290.36 605987 5/1/2025 2047 BOB CALLAHANS POOL 0212 POOL AND FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 2,000.00 605987 5/1/2025 2047 BOB CALLAHANS POOL 0213 POOL AND FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 1,200.00 605988 5/1/2025 2415 BRAUN PETER 5195 PLANT MAINTENANCE: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 500.00 605988 5/1/2025 2415 BRAUN PETER 5222 PLANT MAINTENANCE: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 200.00 605989 5/1/2025 1634 BRODART CO B6964187 BOOK COLLECTION: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 70.30 606046 5/8/2025 1634 BRODART CO B6974981 BOOK COLLECTION: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 46.28 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice 606046 5/8/2025 1634 BRODART CO B6975227 606047 5/8/2025 2836 BRYANT ROBERT 1401.107 - 1405.103 18129 4/18/2025 4188 BUSY BEES LOCKS PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 4188 BUSY BEES LOCKS PC041625 605990 5/1/2025 3978 BWW & COMPANY INC 6 PW17-28 18129 4/18/2025 1307 C B RANCH ENTERPRISE PC041625 18050 3/28/2025 2158 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT 1666 18051 3/28/2025 2158 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT 1682 18052 3/28/2025 2158 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT 1732 18053 3/28/2025 2158 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT 0039 18054 3/28/2025 2158 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT 0062 18129 4/18/2025 1190 CAL MAT PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1190 CAL MAT PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1051 CALED PC041625 18124 4/10/2025 1573 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Ben350914 18139 4/24/2025 1573 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Ben350931 304169 5/1/2025 3407 CALIF DEPT OF HIGHWAY 0000001633178 304169 5/1/2025 3407 CALIF DEPT OF HIGHWAY 0000001633186 304198 5/8/2025 1612 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS E 2154624 SB 304198 5/8/2025 1612 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS E 2154617 SB 18114 4/7/2025 1001 CALIF PARKS AND REC 6334 18129 4/18/2025 1001 CALIF PARKS AND REC PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1001 CALIF PARKS AND REC PC041625 18058 3/28/2025 3546 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS 8850 18129 4/18/2025 200 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1582 CAMPINIS PC041625 18143 4/29/2025 3728 CAPIO 8474 18098 4/7/2025 2022 CAPITOL ENQUIRY 5734 304170 5/1/2025 2063 CASC ENGINEERING 0053154 605991 5/1/2025 1280 CDW LLC AD6HH6X 18129 4/18/2025 2329 CHANNEL CRAFT PC041625 18097 4/7/2025 2201 CHIPOTLE 3100 304171 5/1/2025 1942 CHRISTIAN STITCHERY 15571 304162 5/1/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 020D601304 606048 5/8/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 020D601439 605993 5/1/2025 3998 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING 18118 18129 4/18/2025 2338 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC PC041625 605994 5/1/2025 1771 COSSOU CELINE 1620.104-1625.102 606049 5/8/2025 1771 COSSOU CELINE 1600.103 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1098 COSTCO PC041625 304199 5/8/2025 1268 COSTCO 3697 606050 5/8/2025 2004 COX KRISTI 4100.109-4135.105 18083 4/7/2025 1972 CPS HR CONSULTING 5463 605995 5/1/2025 3607 CROWN CASTLE INC 1813291 304172 5/1/2025 4235 CUCCIA ROBIN 367779 18129 4/18/2025 200 CURIO COLLECTION BY HILTON PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 200 DAKTRONICS PC041625 304200 5/8/2025 3209 DATA PROCESSING DESIGN EGOLD-12118441 605996 5/1/2025 1699 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOC 587669 304201 5/8/2025 1177 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOC Mar'25 304173 5/1/2025 2192 DE NOVO PLANNING 4659 18129 4/18/2025 1586 DEERE & COMPANY PC041625 18129 4/18/2025 1586 DEERE & COMPANY PC041625 605997 5/1/2025 2227 DG INVESTMENT IN00329683 18129 4/18/2025 2581 DH GRAPHICS PC041625 Description Payment Type Invoice Net BOOK COLLECTION: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 27.45 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 7,393.26 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 20.00 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 75.25 YNEZ RD RANCHO HIGHLANDS-TIERRA VISTA RD: PWSW-02 EFT Posted 51,188.98 TICKETS: SENIOR EXCURSION: TCSD P Card 1,023.00 LODGING: CALIF ROBBERY INVESTIGATIONS CONF: PD Credit Card 272.12 LODGING: CALIF ROBBERY INVESTIGATIONS CONF: PD Credit Card 272.12 LODGING: CALIF ROBBERY INVESTIGATIONS CONF: PD Credit Card 272.12 LODGING: CALIF ROBBERY INVESTIGATIONS CONF: PD Credit Card 272.12 LODGING: CALIF ROBBERY INVESTIGATIONS CONF: PD Credit Card 272.12 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 737.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 735.53 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS: CALED: ECDEV P Card 120.00 SUPPORT PAYMENT Wire 771.68 SUPPORT PAYMENT Wire 771.68 1-15 CONGESTION RELIEF TRAFFIC: PW19-02 Printed Check 10,048.49 1-15 CONGESTION RELIEF TRAFFIC: PW19-02 Printed Check 1,110.89 157048 ELEVATOR INSP: 28690 MERCEDES: PW Printed Check 225.00 157049 ELEVATOR INSP: 28690 MERCEDES: PW Printed Check 225.00 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card 335.00 REGISTRATION: CPRS: TCSD P Card 170.00 REGISTRATION: CPRS: TCSD P Card 165.00 REGISTRATION: LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT: PD Credit Card 150.00 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 303.66 REFRESHMENTS: CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING: BLDSF P Card 233.75 REGISTRATION: GOV'T COMMUNICATIONS: CMO Credit Card 50.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card 24.70 NPDES COMPLIANCE SERVICES: PW20-11 Printed Check 92.50 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: ITSS EFT Posted 190.56 GIFT SHOP ITEMS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 352.15 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL MTG 02/25/25 Credit Card 228.36 HIKE BIKE TEMECULA SHIRTS: COMDV Printed Check 904.80 FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION: TCSD Printed Check 55.00 FIRE EXTINGUISHER TESTING: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 216.55 FINANCIAL SOFTWARE UPGRADE: HR/PAYROLL: FINANCE EFT Posted 1,351.25 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: OLD TOWN: PW P Card 36.98 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 777.00 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 294.00 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 882.35 REFRESHMENTS: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS: HR P Card 155.86 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card 311.12 REFRESHMENTS: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 789.60 REFRESHMENTS: DINNER WITH FIREFIGHTERS: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 396.35 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 204.09 SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 333.48 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD P Card 2,818.89 SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD Printed Check 906.89 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,120.00 CPS CONSULTING TRAINING: HR Credit Card 225.00 FIBER SERVICES: 44900 TEMECULA LANE: ITSS EFT Posted 550.00 REFUND: DISMISSED CITATION VIOLATION: PD Printed Check 50.00 LODGING: ELEVATE CONFERENCE: HR P Card 515.04 RECREATION SUPPLIES: SPORTS: TCSD P Card 3,371.25 CLOUD FAXING SERVICE: ITSS Printed Check 75.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES: PW15-11 EFT Posted 13,376.10 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE CONSULTANT SERVICES: CMSP Printed Check 5,500.00 SERAPHINA RESIDENTIAL CEQA REV: COMDV Printed Check 30,598.00 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 820.23 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 139.75 TRAFFIC CAMERA: TEM PKWY-LA PAZ: ITSS EFT Posted 12,508.00 PLAQUES: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 261.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 2581 DH GRAPHICS PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 734.06 18129 4/18/2025 2200 DICKS SPORTING GOODS PC041625 SUPPLIES: TEAM PACE: HR P Card 150.00 606051 5/8/2025 2040 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 48953-R CONSULTANT SERVICES: PW24-02 EFT Posted 23,425.00 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER: TCSD P Card 107.31 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER: TCSD P Card 90.26 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER: TCSD P Card 54.80 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: INTERVIEWS: HR P Card 58.56 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 REIMBURSED BY EMPLOYEE P Card 27.89 18129 4/18/2025 3075 DOORDASH PC041625 SUBSCRIPTION: THEATER: TCSD P Card 9.99 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87315 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE EFT Posted 182.48 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87992 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE EFT Posted 78.47 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87977 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PD EFT Posted 27.80 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87975 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW EFT Posted 2,056.56 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL86546 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW EFT Posted 253.51 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87981 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 1,261.96 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87994 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD EFT Posted 129.30 605998 5/1/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87993 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PW EFT Posted 196.59 606052 5/8/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87979 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDSF EFT Posted 176.67 606052 5/8/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87980 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW EFT Posted 131.80 606052 5/8/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87978 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFORCEMENT: BLDSF EFT Posted 53.42 606052 5/8/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL87976 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: PW EFT Posted 55.92 18129 4/18/2025 3362 DUNN EDWARDS CORP PC041625 PAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STATION: PWFR-11 P Card 835.83 18129 4/18/2025 3362 DUNN EDWARDS CORP PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 36.05 605999 5/1/2025 2258 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVE INV100110 HOT WATER SENSOR: CIVIC CENTER: PW EFT Posted 510.92 304174 5/1/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19560 LASERFICHE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE: CITY CLERK: ITSS Printed Check 35,282.80 304202 5/8/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19634 ADDITIONAL LASERFICHE LICENSES: ITSS Printed Check 5,980.00 304196 5/8/2025 1335 EE VENDOR #1335 Exp Report 04/03/25 CCMF BOARD MEETING: CMO Printed Check 401.54 304204 5/8/2025 1547 EE VENDOR #1547 Reimb: '25 NAB show REIMB: 2025 NAB SHOW: ITSS Printed Check 1,440.50 304187 5/1/2025 2882 EE VENDOR #2882 04/24/25 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT: BLDSF Printed Check 115.00 304197 5/8/2025 2988 EE VENDOR #2988 Reimb: 04/28/25 REIMB: PLUMBING REPAIRS: PW Printed Check 165.03 606059 5/8/2025 3161 EE VENDOR #3161 REIMB: 04/11/25 REIMB: UNIFORMS: COMDV EFT Posted 115.00 304215 5/8/2025 3668 EE VENDOR #3668 REIMB: 04/29/25 REIMB: GRANT MANAGEMENT TRAINING: TCSD Printed Check 338.72 304186 5/1/2025 3678 EE VENDOR #3678 4172025 COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM: ITSS Printed Check 2,000.00 304207 5/8/2025 3752 EE VENDOR #3752 Reimb: '25 TEEX REIMB: TEEX CONFERENCE: ITSS Printed Check 33.99 18129 4/18/2025 200 ELECTRONIC THEATRE CONTROLS PC041625 THEATER SOUND SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD P Card 300.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 EMSERTILE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MPSC: PW P Card 50.11 606000 5/1/2025 1156 ENGINEERING RESOURCE 61323 ENGINEERING CONSULT SERVICES: PW19-11 EFT Posted 3,946.41 606000 5/1/2025 1156 ENGINEERING RESOURCE 61324 ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES: PW20-11 EFT Posted 33,549.20 18129 4/18/2025 1305 EWING IRRIGATION PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 17.53 304210 5/8/2025 100 EXIM 20/20 GROUP LLC Refund: Rental REFUND: TVE2 RENT: CMO Printed Check 260.00 18133 4/10/2025 1998 EYEMED VISION CARE Ben350888 VISION PLAN PAYMENT Wire 2,070.32 18134 4/24/2025 1998 EYEMED VISION CARE Ben350934 VISION PLAN COBRA PAYMENT Wire 7.56 304175 5/1/2025 1892 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL 03/25/25 CDBG BLOCK GRANT FY 24/25: COMDV Printed Check 1,524.00 606053 5/8/2025 2116 FALCON ENGINEERING 2025-3 1-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS: PW16-01 EFT Posted 274,169.12 304176 5/1/2025 1005 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8-805-86715 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES: CIP: PW Printed Check 18.90 304176 5/1/2025 1005 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8-834-70957 EXPRESS MAILING SERVICES: FINANCE Printed Check 7.61 304176 5/1/2025 1005 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8-827-41625 EXPRESS MAILING SERVICES: PW Printed Check 5.69 18129 4/18/2025 4191 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 12.58 18129 4/18/2025 200 FIRST AMERICAN PROPERTY PC041625 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS: LAND DEVELOPMENT: PW P Card 200.00 606054 5/8/2025 1871 FLATIRON WEST INC 23 1-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS: PW16-01 EFT Posted 1,408,571.23 18129 4/18/2025 200 FLIPPER DEVICES PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: ITSS P Card 231.65 606001 5/1/2025 2643 FORENSIC NURSES 2915 SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 800.00 304203 5/8/2025 1176 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 28868 AP WITHHOLDING: NON-RESIDENT Printed Check 563.49 18129 4/18/2025 1572 FWEP ACQUISITION INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 244.17 606002 5/1/2025 1572 FWEP ACQUISITION INC 0020368156-001 SPLASH PAD CHEMICALS: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 551.58 606002 5/1/2025 1572 FWEP ACQUISITION INC 0020392126-001 SPLASH PAD CHEMICALS: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 50.00 18129 4/18/2025 3589 GARF'S SPORT LOUNGE PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 20.34 18129 4/18/2025 3589 GARF'S SPORT LOUNGE PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 17.24 18129 4/18/2025 3589 GARF'S SPORT LOUNGE PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 16.70 18129 4/18/2025 1577 GAYLORD BROS INC PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 320.01 18129 4/18/2025 200 GEOCENTRAL PC041625 GIFT SHOP ITEMS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 826.55 606003 5/1/2025 2374 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INV1031607 CLAIMS TPA: RISK MANAGEMENT: HR EFT Posted 1,817.80 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18082 4/7/2025 2395 GIFTCARDS.COM 5041 EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON GIFT: HR Credit Card 111.88 18091 4/7/2025 1468 GODADDY.COM INC 7457 DOMAIN RENEWAL: ITSS Credit Card 90.68 606004 5/1/2025 3527 GOLDEN STATE COM SI09078 RADIO EQUIPMENT: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: FIRE EFT Posted 1,307.95 18129 4/18/2025 200 GOVERNMENT*IGNIT PC041625 REGISTRATION: NEOGOV 2025: HR P Card 1,200.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 GOVERNMENT*IGNIT PC041625 REGISTRATION: NEOGOV 2025: HR P Card 1,200.00 18129 4/18/2025 1225 GRAINGER PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 19.79 304211 5/8/2025 100 GREAT OAK HIGH SCHOOL - ASB 85666975 REFUND: RHRTPL COMMUNITY ROOM: TCSD Printed Check 200.00 18129 4/18/2025 3589 GUADALAJARA PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL: CITY CLERK P Card 267.08 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: PW P Card 531.15 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: PW P Card 169.11 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: PW P Card 90.21 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 106.09 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 81.51 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 23.91 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 22.83 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 461.97 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 392.61 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 147.79 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 99.85 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 93.48 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 89.15 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 79.91 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 71.75 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 70.46 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 48.02 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 29.45 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 26.84 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 14.13 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 13.03 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 7.23 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 16.80 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: AQUATICS: PW P Card 1,595.96 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: AQUATICS: PW P Card 163.11 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: AQUATICS: PW P Card 30.18 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: AQUATICS: PW P Card 25.97 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 783.00 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 217.46 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 146.75 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 108.74 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 52.17 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 34.41 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 26.07 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 23.37 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 17.40 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 13.90 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 5.22 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 2.83 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 99.78 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 39.89 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 28.23 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 25.00 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 21.73 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 19.54 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 8.15 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 152.24 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 59.77 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 42.28 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 22.80 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 16.83 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 16.36 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 11.61 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FOC: PW P Card 44.72 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FOC: PW P Card 10.85 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: HELP CENTER: PW P Card 40.23 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card 173.99 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card 54.33 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card 4.67 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MRC: PW P Card 95.68 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 101.71 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 43.50 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 9.78 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 7.61 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: OLD TOWN: PW P Card 53.06 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: OLD TOWN: PW P Card 47.37 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: OLD TOWN: PW P Card 15.76 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 256.48 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 212.40 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 179.96 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 166.53 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 123.50 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 119.58 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 87.18 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 72.83 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 68.26 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 65.23 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 63.19 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 54.72 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 52.63 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 49.91 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 47.73 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 44.45 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 43.43 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 41.30 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 36.52 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 35.39 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 33.30 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 25.69 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 23.45 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 10.31 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 8.44 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 4.99 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 2.39 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TCC: PW P Card 45.83 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 66.05 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 33.69 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 19.53 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 7.16 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 5.81 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: WELCOME CENTER: PW P Card 23.70 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: WELCOME CENTER: PW P Card 12.27 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: LAND DEV: PW P Card 65.22 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 39.77 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 276.39 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 112.77 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 81.56 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 72.94 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 49.87 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 36.42 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 22.15 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 3.80 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 17.39 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 2,634.10 18129 4/18/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 20.84 304205 5/8/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC 2634/Feb'25 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: SUPPRESSION: FIRE Printed Check 410.27 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 200 HARBOR FREIGHT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 108.74 18129 4/18/2025 200 HARBOR FREIGHT PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 48.93 18129 4/18/2025 200 HARRAHS HOTEL PC041625 LODGING: NEOGOV 2025: HR P Card 180.27 18129 4/18/2025 3878 HARRAHS HOTEL PC041625 LODGING: NEOGOV CONFERENCE: HR P Card 197.28 304206 5/8/2025 2225 HASA INC 1030930 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 692.77 304206 5/8/2025 2225 HASA INC 1030929 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 692.77 606005 5/1/2025 1093 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL 42612-4557037 MED EMPLOYMENT SCREENING: HR EFT Posted 675.00 606055 5/8/2025 1093 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL 42612-4565171 MED EMPLOYMENT SCREENING: HR EFT Posted 2,765.00 304208 5/8/2025 1083 HINDERLITER DE LLAMA SIN048448 SALES TAX CONSULTING: FINANCE Printed Check 3,978.96 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 COMMERCIAL FREEZER: PWFR-11 P Card 1,947.71 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: CIVIC CENTER: PWFR-11 P Card 192.81 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 48.19 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE P Card 547.95 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 98.91 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 30.28 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 476.76 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 37.68 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: HARVESTON: PW P Card 54.90 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: HARVESTON: PW P Card 33.95 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 40.72 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 219.37 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 201.24 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 197.45 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 42.36 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 20.62 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 12.33 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 11.39 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 215.84 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 77.94 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 650.33 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 135.92 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 94.11 18129 4/18/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT PC041625 STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD P Card 217.43 18129 4/18/2025 200 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 578.11 606006 5/1/2025 2564 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS 9075 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 658.25 606006 5/1/2025 2564 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS 9074 VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 2,535.59 606006 5/1/2025 2564 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS 9073 VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 173.25 606006 5/1/2025 2564 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS 9076 VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 279.60 606007 5/1/2025 1595 INLAND VALLEY SYMPHONY 0525-2025 PERFORMANCES 11/11/24 AND 5/24: TCSD EFT Posted 15,000.00 18122 4/10/2025 1047 INSTATAX EDD Ben350910 STATE TAX PAYMENT Wire 48,949.10 18130 4/23/2025 1047 INSTATAX EDD Ben350919 1ST QTR 2025 UI & ETT PAYMENT Wire 42,457.55 18138 4/24/2025 1047 INSTATAX EDD Ben350927 STATE TAX PAYMENT Wire 48,083.91 18121 4/10/2025 1027 INSTATAX IRS Ben350906 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT Wire 147,486.71 18137 4/24/2025 1027 INSTATAX IRS Ben350925 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT Wire 144,048.18 18079 4/7/2025 1012 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 3723 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card 1,225.00 18129 4/18/2025 1053 INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL CLERKS PC041625 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS: IIMC: CITY CLERK P Card 135.00 18093 4/7/2025 4205 IPORTPRODUCTS.COM 6091 EQUIPMENT: CANYONS & GREAK OAK CONFERENCE: ITSS Credit Card 1,077.50 18129 4/18/2025 1674 ISTOCK INTL INC PC041625 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: TCSD P Card 120.00 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 2,664.38 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 630.75 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 32.61 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 244.69 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 4,502.25 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 206.61 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 48.93 18129 4/18/2025 3095 J QUALITY CONTROLS PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: FIRE P Card 674.25 304182 5/1/2025 100 JAIME GARCIA 85681450 REFUND: SENIOR EXCURSION: TCSD Printed Check 15.00 304177 5/1/2025 2045 JAMES ELLIOTT ENTERTAINMENT Perf: 5/22/25 Ck Adv SETTLEMENT: PARROTHEADS TRIBUTE: 05/22/25 Printed Check 3,500.00 304209 5/8/2025 2045 JAMES ELLIOTT ENTERTAINMENT Perf: 5/23/25 Ck Adv SETTLEMENT: PARROTHEADS TRIBUTE: 05/23/25 Printed Check 2,500.00 18129 4/18/2025 1683 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 188.75 606056 5/8/2025 3704 JOLT SOFTWARE INC INV-311077 SCHEDULING SOFTWARE: TCSD EFT Posted 3,172.46 18129 4/18/2025 2475 JP HANDMADE CORP PC041625 BUSINESS CARDS: PARKS: PW P Card 73.82 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 2475 JP HANDMADE CORP PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW P Card 73.47 18129 4/18/2025 2475 JP HANDMADE CORP PC041625 PRINTING: ECDEV P Card 96.47 304178 5/1/2025 4234 KEARNEY KIMBERLEY 360706 REFUND: DISMISSED CITATION VIOLATION: PD Printed Check 38.00 606008 5/1/2025 2664 KEY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 22246977 PACKAGE TRACKING: CENTRAL SERVICES: ITSS EFT Posted 2,695.00 606057 5/8/2025 1090 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOC 0039648 CONSULTANT SERVICES: COMDV EFT Posted 6,226.25 606058 5/8/2025 3754 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOC 095382006-0325 SAGE SENIOR APARTMENTS CEQA REVIEW: COMDV EFT Posted 3,200.68 18129 4/18/2025 1975 KRACH BREE B PC041625 NAME PLATES: CITY COUNCIL P Card 151.16 18129 4/18/2025 1975 KRACH BREE B PC041625 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CS COMMISSION: TCSD P Card 21.75 18129 4/18/2025 3628 KUBOTA OF TEMECULA PC041625 RENT EQUIPMENT: STREETS: PW P Card 1,901.30 18129 4/18/2025 1014 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA PC041625 REGISTRATION: CITY LEADERS SUMMIT: CITY CLERK P Card 650.00 18129 4/18/2025 2350 LEWIS CLEANERS PC041625 CLEANING SERVICES: ECDEV P Card 85.75 18129 4/18/2025 2350 LEWIS CLEANERS PC041625 CLEANING SERVICES: ECDEV P Card 36.75 18129 4/18/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PC041625 EDUCATION: WORKBOOKS: HR P Card 60.00 606009 5/1/2025 1216 LIFE ASSIST INC 1589018 CPR PROGRAM SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE EFT Posted 2,390.23 606009 5/1/2025 1216 LIFE ASSIST INC 1590113 CPR PROGRAM SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE EFT Posted 900.45 18129 4/18/2025 1244 LOWES INC PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD P Card 73.15 18129 4/18/2025 1244 LOWES INC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 226.35 18129 4/18/2025 1244 LOWES INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: BLDSF P Card 58.69 18129 4/18/2025 1244 LOWES INC PC041625 SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE: TCSD P Card 179.20 18129 4/18/2025 3609 MAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY PC041625 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE: STREETS: PW P Card 672.07 606060 5/8/2025 2414 MARINA LANDSCAPE INC 252403-02 1-5/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERSTATE: PW17-19 EFT Posted 53,140.00 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3905 ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 4,369.76 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3902 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 16,167.13 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3903 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 13,142.17 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3915 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 1,339.12 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3912 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 972.50 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3914 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 113.03 606010 5/1/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MGMT 3913 TREE TRIMMING: VAIL RANCH SLOPE: PW EFT Posted 113.03 18056 3/28/2025 1097 MARRIOTT HOTEL 1830 LODGING: COVERT ENTRY SPECIALIST II: PD Credit Card 468.97 18057 3/28/2025 1097 MARRIOTT HOTEL 2339 LODGING: LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR COURSE: PD Credit Card 633.26 606061 5/8/2025 1996 MATCHETT VIVIAN 1320.107-108 4/24 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 588.00 304179 5/1/2025 2388 MATRIX TELECOM LLC 1199509045 MAR 800 SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER: ITSS Printed Check 77.29 18129 4/18/2025 200 MATTYS PATTYS BURGERS PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 21.55 18129 4/18/2025 200 MATTYS PATTYS BURGERS PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 20.48 606062 5/8/2025 2057 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 19530 CONSULTANT SERVICES: COMDV EFT Posted 4,735.25 304180 5/1/2025 3380 MGG TECHNOLOGIES INC US1903 HELP DESK TICKETING & ASSET MGMT SOFTWARE: ITSS Printed Check 11,400.00 606011 5/1/2025 2042 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L 1245393 LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOM: PWPE-07-03 EFT Posted 19,365.00 606011 5/1/2025 2042 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L 1245359 VAIL RANCH PARK RESTROOMS: PWPE-07-02 EFT Posted 1,970.00 18129 4/18/2025 1111 MICHAELS STORES INC PC041625 SUPPLIES: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 48.77 18129 4/18/2025 1111 MICHAELS STORES INC PC041625 SUPPLIES: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 26.01 606012 5/1/2025 1777 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 506977831 DIGITAL BOOKS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 51.41 606013 5/1/2025 1327 MIKES PRECISION WELDING 408725 WOLF CREEK PARK TRASH ENCLOSURE: PWPI-14 EFT Posted 3,587.00 606014 5/1/2025 1795 MIKO MOUNTAINLION 1211 SEDIMENT REMOVAL: VALLEJO CHANNEL: PW EFT Posted 6,500.00 606063 5/8/2025 1681 MIRANDA JULIO C 3600-3610.105 4/24 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,372.00 18129 4/18/2025 2159 MISAC PC041625 REGISTRATION: MISAC CONFERENCE: ITSS P Card 50.00 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 62.42 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 16.03 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW P Card 14.39 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 606.03 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 185.96 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 74.39 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 52.74 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 238.92 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 166.00 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FOC: PW P Card 224.68 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card 959.52 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card (1,071.84) 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 70.82 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 22.86 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MUSEUM: PW P Card 10.16 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 1,871.70 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 196.35 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 37.10 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TCC: PW P Card 1,102.14 18129 4/18/2025 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TCC: PW P Card 111.92 606015 5/1/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 04/01/25 GRAPHIC DESIGN WORK: BROCHURES: TCSD EFT Posted 1,300.00 606015 5/1/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 04/15/25 GRAPHIC DESIGN: ART EVENTS & MUSEUM MURALS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 606064 5/8/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J Perf: 04/19/25 ART METHODS LECTURE: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 606064 5/8/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 2047.105 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 126.00 18129 4/18/2025 3509 MOTEL 6 PC041625 LODGING: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD P Card 62.86 18129 4/18/2025 3509 MOTEL 6 PC041625 LODGING: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD P Card 58.38 18129 4/18/2025 200 MT SAN JACINTO COLLEGE PC041625 REGISTRATION: MSJC HIGHER ED: ECDEV P Card (400.00) 606016 5/1/2025 3248 NALIPOPISH.COM 99442-000141 EVENT DESIGN SERVICES: RIBBON CUTTING: PW16-01 EFT Posted 1,190.00 18129 4/18/2025 4019 NATIONAL PROCUREMENT PC041625 NIGP MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: FINANCE P Card 125.00 18123 4/10/2025 1038 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Ben350912 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 6,817.54 18140 4/24/2025 1038 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Ben350933 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 7,063.70 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81059 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 561.81 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81056 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 500.00 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81067 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 471.13 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81058 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 459.13 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81066 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 379.51 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81063 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 365.14 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81055 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 333.37 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81064 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 306.74 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81049 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 299.94 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81060 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 299.94 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81065 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 290.85 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81054 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 287.14 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81053 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 264.43 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81052 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 264.43 606018 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81051 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 245.88 606019 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81050 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 229.03 606019 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81061 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 229.03 606019 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81057 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 146.39 606019 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81062 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 95.60 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81147 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 3,853.52 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81144 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 2,681.70 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81143 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 450.00 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81145 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: VARIOUS SITES: PW EFT Posted 6,450.00 606017 5/1/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 81146 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: HARVESTON LAKE PARK: PW EFT Posted 8,328.16 18129 4/18/2025 200 NORM'S RESTAURANT PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 24.86 18129 4/18/2025 200 NORM'S RESTAURANT PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 23.68 18129 4/18/2025 200 NORM'S RESTAURANT PC041625 MEALS: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 20.99 18129 4/18/2025 1013 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS PC041625 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW P Card 26.07 18129 4/18/2025 200 OCC PARKING PC041625 PARKING: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 5.35 304181 5/1/2025 4228 OHANA GAME TRUCK 04/17/25 MOBILE GAME TRUCK: TCSD Printed Check 350.00 606020 5/1/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE 078774 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: FIRE EFT Posted 88.02 606020 5/1/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE 078777 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: FIRE EFT Posted 49.98 606020 5/1/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE 078807 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 895.95 606020 5/1/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE 078760 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 128.44 18129 4/18/2025 2520 OREILLY AUTO PARTS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: PARKS: PW P Card 44.10 18129 4/18/2025 2824 OSCARS BREWING CO PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: TVE2: ED P Card 206.63 304212 5/8/2025 3462 PECHANGA RESORTS INC 1700.105 - 1710.105 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD Printed Check 1,470.00 18125 4/10/2025 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 350918 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 1,181.79 18119 4/14/2025 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben350904 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 184,322.01 18136 4/24/2025 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben350923 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 183,590.18 18141 4/28/2025 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben350935 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 1,186.34 18118 4/10/2025 1016 PERS HEALTH INSURANCE Ben350900 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT Wire 217,877.65 18129 4/18/2025 200 PINNACLE PROMOTIONS INC PC041625 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS: 1-15/FVP RIBBON CUTTING: PW16-01 P Card 727.94 606021 5/1/2025 2893 POS SUPPLY SOLUTIONS INV-200754 TRAFFIC DEVICE THERMAL PAPER: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 584.32 606022 5/1/2025 1493 PREMIER MARKETING 3660 EVENT PERFORMANCE SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,095.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 PREMIUM PARKING PC041625 PARKING: AFO COURSE: PW P Card 48.50 18099 4/7/2025 1020 PRESS ENTERPRISE COM 8732 ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: CC Credit Card 14.00 606065 5/8/2025 3218 PRETI LUCAS 2504E VIDEOGRAPHY PRODUCTION: COMSP EFT Posted 14,600.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 606066 5/8/2025 3971 PRN PRODUCTIONS PERF: 04/25/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: FRIDAY NIGHT LIVE 04/25/25 EFT Posted 56.46 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310235 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 60.71 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310226 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 12.74 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310227 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 37.01 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310222 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 24.47 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310241 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 9.89 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132310878 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 17.75 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132309736B UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 55.81 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132309737A UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 1.76 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132309737B UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 46.26 606023 5/1/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 132309736A UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 9.24 304183 5/1/2025 2635 PUBLIC SAFETY ENTERPRISES PE0000002561A EMERGENCY RADIO RENTAL 03/01/25 - 03/31/25: PD Printed Check 634.95 304183 5/1/2025 2635 PUBLIC SAFETY ENTERPRISES PE0000002561 B EMERGENCY RADIO RENTAL 03/01/25 - 03/31/25: PD Printed Check 126.99 304213 5/8/2025 4236 PV CIRCONOMY COMPANY 04/23/25 REFUND: TVE2 RENT: CMO Printed Check 200.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 QR.IO PC041625 QR SUBSCRIPTION: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 35.00 304184 5/1/2025 2169 QUINN COMPANY WOG00022585 GENERATOR REPAIRS: VARIOUS CITY SITES: PW Printed Check 1,570.85 304184 5/1/2025 2169 QUINN COMPANY WOG00022584 GENERATOR REPAIRS: VARIOUS CITY SITES: PW Printed Check 1,175.34 18129 4/18/2025 1103 R C P BLOCK AND BRICK PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 582.70 18129 4/18/2025 1103 R C P BLOCK AND BRICK PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 59.51 304185 5/1/2025 2064 RADEECAL INC INV-3885 SHELTER TRAILER WRAPS: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: FIRE Printed Check 2,540.00 18150 4/18/2025 1021 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST MAR'25 WATER 2 VARIOUS WATER SERVICES MAR BATCH 2 Wire 7,735.96 304214 5/8/2025 1021 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST K1929-2045025 ES RA INSTALL 1-INCH WATER LATERAL: PW 17-19 Printed Check 10,000.00 18129 4/18/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: PARK INCLUSION PROGRAMS: TCSD P Card 42.53 606067 5/8/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT INV-40033 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 624.50 606067 5/8/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT INV-40091 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 624.50 606067 5/8/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT INV-40136 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 312.25 606067 5/8/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT INV-40032 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 312.25 606067 5/8/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT INV-40227 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 312.25 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER: PW P Card 70.80 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 1,076.54 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 120.50 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 337.83 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 74.84 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 60.58 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card 26.86 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card (26.86) 18129 4/18/2025 2552 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: THEATER: PW P Card (74.84) 18129 4/18/2025 1574 REGAL CINEMAS INC PC041625 TICKETS: CRC DAY CAMP: TCSD P Card 3,615.65 606024 5/1/2025 2203 REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS 00131730 PHONE SERVICE: EOC: FIRE EFT Posted 534.00 606025 5/1/2025 4182 RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 122361 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM: PW22-05 EFT Posted 2,407.50 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252520 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 29,083.38 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252539 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 16,899.62 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252518 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 15,070.25 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252522 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 8,348.00 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252544 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 5,551.19 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252543 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 4,834.85 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252549 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 4,200.77 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252545 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 3,721.00 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252552 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 3,358.00 606068 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252533 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 2,196.00 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252521 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,830.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252548 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,637.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252530 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,128.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252550 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,023.95 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252523 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 912.00 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252535 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 712.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252536 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 700.00 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252542 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 640.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252525 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 501.50 606069 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252537 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 441.72 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252551 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 309.95 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252538 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 260.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252547 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 257.25 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252528 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 244.00 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252532 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 91.50 606070 5/8/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 252526 MARCH 2O25 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 56.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 RITEAID PC041625 SUPPLIES: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD P Card 93.00 606071 5/8/2025 1834 ROBERTS PATRICIA 2700.104 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 378.00 304188 5/1/2025 4233 RUTLEDGE MARIA 362870 REFUND: DISMISSED CITATION VIOLATION: PD Printed Check 50.00 18055 3/28/2025 3837 SAN DIEGO COUNTY 3418 REGISTRATION: EMERGENCY VEHICLE OPERATIONS: PD Credit Card 1,787.00 18047 4/7/2025 1025 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE 7628 SUBSCRIPTION: DIGITAL NEWSPAPER: PLANNING Credit Card 104.00 606026 5/1/2025 1552 SANBORN GWYNETH PERF: 04/19/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: "COUNTRY LIVE @ THE MERC 4/19 EFT Posted 861.00 606027 5/1/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 04022025 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MPSC/HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 275.00 606027 5/1/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 04102025 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: REDI COMMISSION: CITY CLERK EFT Posted 135.00 606027 5/1/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 04192025 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 606072 5/8/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 010426025 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 606072 5/8/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 04172025 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 18129 4/18/2025 2817 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: OLD TOWN: PW P Card 121.60 18129 4/18/2025 2817 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 23.45 18096 4/7/2025 3149 SCRIBE 1006 SOFTWARE ANNUAL RENEWAL: ITSS Credit Card 1,008.00 606028 5/1/2025 1509 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC PERF: 04/17/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: JAZZ AT THE MERC 4/17/25 EFT Posted 343.00 606073 5/8/2025 1509 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC PERF: 04/26/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: STAND UP COMEDY 04/26/25 EFT Posted 1,310.00 606073 5/8/2025 1509 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC PERF: 04/24/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: JAZZ AT THE MERC 04/24/25 EFT Posted 635.00 304189 5/1/2025 1787 SHRED IT US JV LLC 8010548496 SHREDDING SERVICES: CITYWIDE: CITY CLERK Printed Check 280.36 18132 4/23/2025 4243 SISU VR REFUND: 04/23/25 REFUND: TVE2 RENT: CMO Credit Card 100.00 18129 4/18/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 1,853.31 18129 4/18/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 1,295.94 18129 4/18/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 855.05 18129 4/18/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 664.73 18129 4/18/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE PC041625 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: PARKS: PW P Card 370.04 18129 4/18/2025 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD P Card 131.73 18129 4/18/2025 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: CAREER CONFERENCE: WORKFORCE DEV: TCSD P Card 408.00 18129 4/18/2025 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD P Card 296.43 18129 4/18/2025 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: SPLASH PAD GRAND OPENING: TCSD P Card 36.98 304190 5/1/2025 1153 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 4516988 FLAT EMISSIONS FEE: MPSC: TCSD Printed Check 165.96 304190 5/1/2025 1153 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 4512961 1 C E ELEC GEN DIESEL: MPSC: TCSD Printed Check 541.04 606029 5/1/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST 0305071 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 606029 5/1/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST 0305264 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 304216 5/8/2025 1704 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 45949250501 MAY'25 GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,0978,0979: ITSS Printed Check 437.68 18129 4/18/2025 200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PC041625 DUES & MEMBERSHIPS: AQUATICS: TCSD P Card 40.00 18113 4/7/2025 1399 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 5370 AIRFARE: CPRS CONFERENCE: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card 478.96 18112 4/7/2025 1399 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 2170 AIRFARE: CPRS CONFERENCE: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card (478.96) 18078 4/7/2025 1399 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 4358 AIRFARE: ICSC CONFERENCE: CITY COUNCIL Credit Card 468.96 18129 4/18/2025 1399 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PC041625 AIRFARE: LEGISLATIVE MEETING: PW P Card 438.95 606074 5/8/2025 1971 SPERO VINEYARDS INC 04/22/25 GLOBAL CITIZENS VITICULTURE EXCURSION: TCSD EFT Posted 500.00 18129 4/18/2025 3645 SRCAR PC041625 REGISTRATION: SCRCAR: ECDEV P Card 625.00 18129 4/18/2025 3645 SRCAR PC041625 SRCAR CONFERENCE: PLANNING P Card 125.00 18129 4/18/2025 1028 STADIUM PIZZA INC PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: TVE2: ED P Card 219.50 18129 4/18/2025 1028 STADIUM PIZZA INC PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: TVE2: ED P Card 156.96 18129 4/18/2025 1452 STAPLES INC PC041625 GIFT CARDS EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON: TEAM PACE: HR P Card 150.00 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039149 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 35.33 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039150 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 207.84 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039151 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 111.70 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039148 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 60.56 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039152 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD EFT Posted 134.98 606075 5/8/2025 1452 STAPLES INC 6030039153 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD EFT Posted 61.92 606076 5/8/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 812806 MAR BLOOD ALCOHOL SERVICES: PD EFT Posted 875.00 606076 5/8/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 808029b MAR FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: HR EFT Posted 1,764.00 606076 5/8/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 808029c MAR FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: INTERN & VOLUNTEERS: TCSD EFT Posted 505.00 606076 5/8/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 808029a MAR FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: INTERN & VOLUNTEERS: TCSD EFT Posted 147.00 606076 5/8/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 808029d MAR FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 3,907.00 18129 4/18/2025 1983 STATEFOODSAFETY.COM PC041625 STAFF TRAINING: TCSD P Card 280.00 18129 4/18/2025 1441 STATER BROTHERS PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: VITICULTURE: TCSD P Card 57.59 304191 5/1/2025 2016 STC TRAFFIC INC 7954 TRAFFIC SIGNAL -SAFETY LIGHTS PROJECT: PW23-13 Printed Check 9,515.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 304192 5/1/2025 4231 SUNGAHID KYLE 362694 REFUND: DISMISSED CITATION VIOLATION: PD Printed Check 70.00 18129 4/18/2025 2059 SUPERIOR READY MIX PC041625 CONCRETE: PWFR-11 P Card 1,374.57 18129 4/18/2025 3536 TARGET PC041625 STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD P Card 33.53 18129 4/18/2025 3536 TARGET PC041625 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 31.81 18129 4/18/2025 200 TECHNIDEA CORPORATION PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: LAND DEV: PW P Card 225.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 TECHNIDEACORPORATION PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: LAND DEV: PW P Card 88.00 606030 5/1/2025 1257 TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY 03/31/25 BUS BENCHES PLACEMENT & MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 2,030.62 606077 5/8/2025 1914 TEMECULA VALLEY BACKFLOW 51206 BACKFLOW TESTING & REPAIRS: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 3,667.50 606077 5/8/2025 1914 TEMECULA VALLEY BACKFLOW 51289 BACKFLOW TESTING & REPAIRS: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 1,946.50 18129 4/18/2025 1054 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER PC041625 REGISTRATION: STATE OF THE CITY: CS COMMISSION: TCSD P Card 80.00 18129 4/18/2025 1054 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER PC041625 REGISTRATION: STATE OF THE CITY: TCSD P Card 160.00 18129 4/18/2025 1054 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER PC041625 REGISTRATION: STATE OF THE CITY: THEATER: TCSD P Card 80.00 18129 4/18/2025 1030 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 17.42 18129 4/18/2025 1030 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 82.13 18129 4/18/2025 1030 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PARKS: PW P Card 29.46 304217 5/8/2025 1371 TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYERS PERF: 04/04-04/20/25 TICKET SALES AGREEMENT: 9 TO 5 THE MUSICAL Printed Check 28,324.68 18129 4/18/2025 1234 TEMECULA WINNELSON PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 216.81 606031 5/1/2025 1232 TERRYBERRY COMPANY S74915 SERVICE RECOGNITION: HR EFT Posted 97.02 18129 4/18/2025 200 THE CUBAN HUT PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL P Card 301.10 18129 4/18/2025 200 THE CUBAN HUT PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: SPECIAL EVENTS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 1,087.24 18129 4/18/2025 200 THE TOLL ROADS PC041625 TOLL ROAD PAYMENT: EM P Card 16.08 18129 4/18/2025 3903 THE VALLEY BUSINESS PC041625 MARKETING: ECDEV P Card 750.00 18129 4/18/2025 3903 THE VALLEY BUSINESS PC041625 MARKETING: ECDEV P Card (750.00) 606032 5/1/2025 1063 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS 25494 ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 800.00 606033 5/1/2025 2421 TITAN RENTAL GROUP 50365 RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 379.44 606078 5/8/2025 2421 TITAN RENTAL GROUP 50367 RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 7,272.19 18129 4/18/2025 200 TOPS PRODUCTS PC041625 1099 SERVICES: FINANCE P Card 21.74 18129 4/18/2025 200 TRINITY WOMENS HEALTH PC041625 EMPLOYEE REIMBURSEMENT P Card 15.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 TRI-STATE MATERIALS PC041625 SUPPLIES: PWFR-11 P Card 2,230.43 18129 4/18/2025 200 TURNKEY INDUSTRIAL PIPE PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 2,848.75 18129 4/18/2025 200 TUSKER METALS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 429.17 18129 4/18/2025 200 TUSKER METALS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: CRC: PW P Card 375.19 18129 4/18/2025 200 TUSKER METALS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: GARAGE: PW P Card 11.90 18129 4/18/2025 200 TUSKER METALS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: MPSC: PW P Card 531.79 18129 4/18/2025 200 TUSKER METALS PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: TVE2: PW P Card 149.16 606034 5/1/2025 1555 TV CONVENTION 02/28/25 FEBRUARY 2025 BUSINESS IMPROVE DIST ASSESSMENTS EFT Posted 133,475.82 606035 5/1/2025 1876 TWM ROOFING INC 04/19/25 ROOF MAINTENANCE: VARIOUS FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 19,105.00 18129 4/18/2025 2340 TWOS COMPANY INC PC041625 GIFT SHOP ITEMS: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 111.88 18092 4/7/2025 1003 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 5284 TYLER CONFERENCE REGISTRATION: ITSS Credit Card 1,199.00 18129 4/18/2025 3302 UHAUL PC041625 UHAUL RENTAL: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 80.16 18129 4/18/2025 1652 ULINE INC PC041625 SHIPPING: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 164.36 606036 5/1/2025 3933 ULTIMATE MAINTENANCE 35001A JANITORIAL SERVICES: CITY & TCSD FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 30,283.00 606036 5/1/2025 3933 ULTIMATE MAINTENANCE 35001B JANITORIAL SERVICES: OTSF: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 755.00 18129 4/18/2025 1131 UNITED RENTALS NORTH PC041625 RENT EQUIPMENT: PARKS: PW P Card 232.65 18129 4/18/2025 2273 UPTOWN TEMECULA PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: BLDSF P Card 9.99 18129 4/18/2025 2273 UPTOWN TEMECULA PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: LAND DEV: PW P Card 14.99 18129 4/18/2025 200 USTOREIT MINI STORAGE PC041625 RENT: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD P Card 433.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 USTOREIT MINI STORAGE PC041625 RENT: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD P Card 221.00 18129 4/18/2025 1874 VALLEY PRINTING SERVICES PC041625 PRINTING: CMO P Card 139.20 606079 5/8/2025 2629 VERSA PRODUCTS 5020622 SC ERGONOMIC ITEMS: HR EFT Posted 296.65 18129 4/18/2025 1475 VONS PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER: TCSD P Card 44.15 18120 4/10/2025 3895 VOYA FINANCIAL Ben350902 VOYA RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 48,782.75 18135 4/24/2025 3895 VOYA FINANCIAL Ben3500921 VOYA RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 44,558.61 606080 5/8/2025 2034 WADDLETON JEFFREY L 1239 DJ & ANNOUNCING SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 550.00 606080 5/8/2025 2034 WADDLETON JEFFREY L 2480.101 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 259.00 606037 5/1/2025 2183 WALLACE AND ASSOC 31709 CONSTRUCTION MGMT SERVICES: TRAFFIC: PW23-12 EFT Posted 500.00 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 888.52 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 162.93 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 EVENT GIVEAWAYS: TEEN EGG HUNT: TCSD P Card 79.26 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card 94.50 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card 34.11 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 RECREATION SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD P Card 27.70 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 SUPPLIES: MUSEUM: TCSD P Card 99.71 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 SUPPLIES: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 170.41 18129 4/18/2025 1439 WALMART PC041625 SUPPLIES: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 160.08 304218 5/8/2025 1439 WALMART 04/30/25 RECREATION SUPPLIES: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD Printed Check 502.44 606038 5/1/2025 1119 WATER SAFETY PRODUCT F3314299 POOLS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD EFT Posted 3,948.82 304193 5/1/2025 1102 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLIES 83180397 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: FACILITY MAINT: PW Printed Check 2,047.87 18090 4/7/2025 2455 WE TRANSFER 6551 SUBSCRIPTION: ITSS Credit Card 234.84 304219 5/8/2025 2230 WEBB MUNICIPAL ARIV0000430 ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING & CFD Printed Check 10,490.74 18129 4/18/2025 1869 WEBSTAURANT STORE PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: TCSD P Card 3,092.22 18129 4/18/2025 2175 WHITE CAP LP PC041625 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE STATION: PW P Card 230.08 304194 5/1/2025 2175 WHITE CAP LP 50030973746 SUPPLIES & SM TOOLS & EQUIP: FIRE Printed Check 230.08 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0330 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 3,365.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0340 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 2,990.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0327 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 2,220.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0328 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 2,070.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0336 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,825.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0338 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,340.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0339 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,175.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0341 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,175.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0333 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,050.00 606039 5/1/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0342 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 875.00 606081 5/8/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOVAL INV0346 ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS: TCSD EFT Posted 600.00 304195 5/1/2025 4232 WILLIAMSON VICTORIA 362737 REFUND: DISMISSED CITATION VIOLATION: PD Printed Check 60.00 18129 4/18/2025 200 WPSG, INC PC041625 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: MEDIC: FIRE P Card 2,196.64 18084 4/7/2025 3958 YOUR MEMBERSHIP 8695 JOB POSTING: HR Credit Card 129.00 18129 4/18/2025 1340 ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY PC041625 ADMISSION: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 38.00 18129 4/18/2025 1340 ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY PC041625 REFRESHMENTS: CRC: TCSD P Card 28.20 18129 4/18/2025 1340 ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY PC041625 TICKETS: TEEN ZONE: TCSD P Card 1,378.00 TOTAL 3,937,046.87 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-06 Amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to Repeal and Replace Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) (Long Range Project No. LR25-0068) (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2025-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.23 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(H) BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinance No. 2025-06 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 13, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO.2025-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.23 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(H) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Senate Bill 477, effective March 25, 2024, reorganized Accessory Dwelling Unit Law ("ADU Law") (formerly Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22) (now Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code), and has led to references to ADU Law in the Temecula Municipal Code to be no longer applicable. B. The State of California adopted amendments to Government Code Sections 66313, 66314, and 66323, altogether known as Senate Bill 1211, effective January 1, 2025, which further amend standards and requirements for accessory dwelling units ("ADUs"). C. Portions of the City's current regulations for ADUs and Junior ADUs ("JADUs") require amendment to remain consistent with State Law. D. Building Code Section 502.1 and Fire Code Section 505.1 impose address identification requirements to facilitate emergency response. E. On April 23, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-28 instituting an addressing policy for ADUs and JADUs to ensure clear unit identification, timely emergency service response, and mail delivery. F. Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.23.050(B)(7) requires all ADUs, except those ADUs approved pursuant to Section 17.23.030(D), to be addressed according to existing City policy. G. Uniform addressing for all ADUs and JADUs, whether approved pursuant to Section 17.23.030 or not, is necessary to ensure emergency services, such as police, paramedics, and fire, can promptly respond to emergencies that may occur in ADUs and JADUs. H. The City Council finds and determines that uniform addressing for all ADUs and JADUs is essential to ensure the public health and safety so that valuable time is not lost by emergency personnel in trying to locate the correct residence in the case of an emergency. I. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on April 16th, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-09, recommending that the City Council approve the Title 17 amendments. J. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on May 13th, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council closed the public hearing and considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby repeals and replaces Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 17.23 Accessory Dwelling Units § 17.23.010. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 13 of the California Government Code to allow accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in a manner that encourages their development but simultaneously minimizes impacts on traffic, parking, density, and other areas where the city is still permitted to exercise local control. § 17.23.020. Definitions. "Accessory dwelling unit" or "ADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 66313(a), as the same may be amended from time to time. An accessory dwelling unit contains a kitchen, which may include plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and/or physical space set aside for cooking or meal preparation facilities, which may include space for a refrigerator, sink, wet bar, and/or dishwasher. N "Attached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e. addition) of the primary dwelling or existing structure and shares a common wall with the primary dwelling or existing structure. "Detached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling or existing structure, which does not share any walls with the primary dwelling or existing structure. "Existing structure" means an existing single-family dwelling or other accessory structure that can be safely converted into habitable space under the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city, and other applicable law. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" or "JADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 66313(d), as the same may be amended from time to time. A junior accessory dwelling unit must contain an efficiency kitchen, which shall include a cooking facility with appliances, such as a refrigerator, stovetop, oven, sink, wet bar, and/or dishwasher, and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of a reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU. "Primary dwelling," for purposes of this chapter, means the existing or proposed single- family dwelling on the lot where an ADU would be located. "Public transit," for purposes of this chapter, has the meaning ascribed in Government Code Section 66313(m), as the same may be amended from time to time. § 17.23.030. General Requirements for "Building Permit Only" ADUs and JADUs (Governed by Government Code Section 66323). A. An applicant shall not be required to submit an application for an ADU or JADU permit under this chapter, and may instead seek building permit approval for an ADU or JADU that satisfies the requirements of both Government Code Section 66323, as the same may be amended from time to time, and the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city. B. An ADU or JADU approved by a building permit only process shall be rented only for terms of thirty-one days or longer. C. The property owner shall record a declaration of restrictions, in a form approved by the city attorney, placing the following restrictions on the property, the property owner, and all successors in interest: (1) the ADU or JADU is to be rented only for terms of thirty- one days or longer, unless state law and the city's municipal code are both amended to allow short-term rentals; (2) the ADU or JADU is not to be sold or conveyed separately from the primary dwelling unless state law and the city's municipal code permit otherwise, and (3) if there is a JADU on the property, either the JADU or primary dwelling shall be occupied by the owner of record. Proof of recordation of the covenant shall be provided to the city before the city issues the finals the building permit. D. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66323, the city shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed -use zone to create any of the following: 1. One ADU and JADU per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply: a. The ADU or JADU is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure and may include an expansion of not more than one hundred fifty square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling. c. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The JADU complies with the requirements of Article 3, Chapter 13, Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code (commencing with Section 66333) and with the requirements set forth in subsection (E) below. 2. One detached, new construction ADU that does not exceed four -foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The ADU may be combined with a JADU described in subsection (13)(1) above. The ADU shall be no more than eight hundred square feet in size, with a height limit as follows: a. Sixteen feet for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit; b. Eighteen feet for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or a high -quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155. An additional two feet in height shall be permitted to accommodate a roof pitch on an ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. c. Eighteen feet for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed multi- family, multi -story dwelling. 3. One ADU within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings. If requested, multiple ADUs shall be allowed, up to the number of ADUs that equals twenty-five percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units in the structure. 4. Not more than two detached ADUs located on a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, subject to the height limits described in Subsection (D)(2) above, as applicable, and no more than four -foot rear yard and side setbacks. 5. Not more than eight detached ADUs or a quantity equal to the number of existing primary dwelling units on the lot, whichever is fewer, on a lot that has an existing multifamily dwelling, subject to the height limits described in Subsection (D)(2) above, as applicable, and no more than four -foot rear yard and side setbacks. E. In accordance with the standards set forth in Article 3, Chapter 13, Division 1, Title 7 of the Government Code (commencing with Section 66333), JADUs shall comply with the following requirements, unless state law is amended to set forth different standards in which case state law standards will govern: 1. A JADU shall be a minimum of one hundred fifty square feet and a maximum of five hundred square feet of gross floor area. The gross floor area of a shared sanitation facility shall not be included in the maximum gross floor area of a JADU. 2. A JADU must be contained entirely within the walls of the existing or proposed single-family dwelling. Enclosed uses within the residence, such as attached garages, shall be considered part of the proposed or existing single-family residence. 3. A separate exterior entry from the main entrance to the single-family dwelling shall be provided to serve a JADU. If the JADU does not include separate sanitation facilities, the JADU shall include a separate entrance from the main entrance to the structure, with an interior entry to the main living area. 4. A JADU may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing single-family dwelling. 5. A JADU shall include an efficiency kitchen which shall include all of the following: a. A cooking facility with appliances. b. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU. 6. No additional parking is required for a JADU. 7. The JADU or primary residence shall be occupied by the owner of record unless the owner is a governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization. 8. The property owner shall record a declaration of restrictions, in a form approved by the city attorney, placing the following restrictions on the property, the property owner, and all successors in interest: (1) the JADU is not to be sold or conveyed separately from the primary dwelling unit; and (2) the JADU must conform with the size and attributes required by this subsection (E) and Government Code Section 66333. F. The city shall not issue a building permit until the applicant provides a will serve letter from the local water and sewer provider. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a private sewage disposal system is being used, the applicant must provide documentation showing approval by the local health officer in lieu of the will serve letter by the local sewer provider. G. All ADUs and JADUs constructed pursuant to this section shall satisfy the requirements of the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city. H. In accordance with state law, ADUs are an accessory use or an accessory structure to the primary dwelling on the lot. ADUs shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot. I. The application for an ADU or JADU pursuant to this section must be signed by the owner(s) of the parcel of land. J. Where an ADU or JADU application is submitted with an application for a primary dwelling that is subject to discretionary review under this code, the ADU or JADU application will be considered separately without discretionary review or a public hearing in accordance with this section, following action on the portion of the project subject to discretionary review. K. Addressing. Addressing for all ADUs and JADU units shall be as follows, without exception: 1. The primary residential unit, newly constructed or existing, shall be addressed according to existing policy and shall include an illuminated "Unit 1" identifier. This shall only be applicable if an ADU or JADU is proposed for the same parcel. 2. A second residential unit, an ADU or JADU, shall bear the same main address as the primary residence with the additional unit bearing an illuminated "Unit 2" identifier. Any subsequent ADU or JADU shall bear the same main address as the primary residence and be sequentially numbered with the Unit number reference. 3. All addresses shall be legible and physically installed in a prominent location on the building that clearly identifies which entry is associated with each address and in accordance with Section 17.28.050(N) of this code and applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. § 17.23.040. General requirements and application procedures for Ministerial ADUs (Governed by Government Code Section 66314). A. Before constructing an ADU or converting an existing structure to an ADU that does not fall under the "building permit approval only" requirements in Section 17.23.030, the applicant shall obtain permits in accordance with the requirements of this section. B. All ADUs shall satisfy the requirements of the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the city. C. In accordance with state law, ADUs are an accessory use or an accessory structure to the primary dwelling on the lot. ADUs shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot. r� D. Applications for ADUs shall be completed in accordance with Section 17.03.030 of this development code. The application for the ADU must be signed by the owner(s) of the parcel of land. E. The director of community development or designee shall ministerially review and approve an ADU permit application and shall not require a public hearing, provided that the submitted application is complete and demonstrates that the ADU complies with the applicable requirements contained in this chapter and any other applicable law. F. ADU permit applications subject to ministerial approval shall be processed within the timelines established by California Government Code Section 66317. The city shall approve or deny the ADU permit within sixty days of receiving the application, or as the deadline required by Government Code Section 66317 may be amended from time to time. G. Where an ADU permit application is submitted with an application for a primary dwelling that is subject to discretionary review under this code, the ADU permit application will be considered separately without discretionary review or a public hearing, following action on the portion of the project subject to discretionary review. H. In addition to obtaining an ADU permit, the applicant shall be required to obtain a building permit and any other applicable construction permits prior to the construction of the ADU. I. Addressing. Addressing for all ADUs shall be as follows, without exception: The primary residential unit, newly constructed or existing, shall be addressed according to existing policy and shall include an illuminated "Unit 1" identifier. This shall only be applicable if an ADU is proposed for the same parcel. 2. A second residential unit, an ADU, shall bear the same main address as the primary residence with the additional unit bearing an illuminated "Unit 2" identifier. Any subsequent ADU shall bear the same main address as the primary residence and be sequentially numbered with the Unit number reference. 3. All addresses shall be legible and physically installed in a prominent location on the building that clearly identifies which entry is associated with each address and in accordance with Section 17.28.050(N) of this code and applicable Building Code requirements. § 17.23.050. Standards for Ministerial ADUs (Governed by Government Code Section 66314). Except those "building permit only" ADUs approved pursuant to Subsection 17.23.030(D), ADUs shall comply with the following standards: A. Location Restrictions. One ADU shall be allowed on a lot with a proposed or existing primary dwelling that is zoned residential. B. Development Standards. 1. Size Restrictions. Except as otherwise set forth in this Section, if there is an existing primary dwelling, the total floor area of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty percent of the gross floor area for the primary dwelling. An attached ADU that is proposed with a new primary dwelling shall not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet in floor area. A detached ADU shall not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet in total floor area. In no case shall an ADU be less than the minimum square footage of an "efficiency unit" as defined in Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code. In no event shall the application of these size restrictions prohibit the construction of an eight hundred and fifty square foot ADU or a one thousand square foot ADU that provides more than one bedroom. 2. Height Restrictions. The maximum height of any new ADU shall not exceed the following: a. Sixteen feet for a detached ADU, except as provided in paragraphs b and c below. b. Eighteen feet for a detached ADU on a lot that is within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high -quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Public Resources Code Section 21155; or twenty feet if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. Eighteen feet for a detached ADU on a lot with an existing or proposed multistory multifamily dwelling. d. Twenty-five feet or the height limit applicable to the primary dwelling, whichever is less, for an attached ADU. 3. Transfer. An ADU shall not be sold, transferred, or assigned separately from the primary dwelling unless the ADU was built or developed by a qualified nonprofit corporation and meets the additional requirements of Government Code Section 66341. 4. No Short -Term Rental. ADUs may be rented but shall not be used for short-term rentals for less than thirty-one days. 5. Setbacks. No setback shall be required for an ADU that is within an existing structure or new ADU that is constructed in the same location and with the same dimensions as an existing structure. For all other ADUs, the required setback from side and rear lot lines shall be four feet. An ADU shall comply with all required front yard setbacks otherwise required by the municipal code for that zoning district except where the application of the front yard setback requirement would not permit construction of an eight hundred square foot ADU with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks on the lot. An ADU in the front yard setback area is only permissible if construction of the same ADU in the rear or side yard is entirely infeasible. 6. Lot Coverage. An ADU shall conform to all lot coverage requirements applicable to the zoning district in which the property is located, except where the application of the lot coverage regulations would not permit construction of an eight hundred square foot ADU with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks. 7. Historic Resources. An ADU that has the potential to adversely impact any historical resource listed on the California Register of Historic Resources, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings" found at Section 68.3 of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as amended from time to time. An ADU shall also comply with all local historic register requirements, as well as all objective local requirements, ordinances, or specific plans that pertain to historic resources. 8. Separation. All detached ADUs shall have a minimum six foot separation from the primary residence, as measured in a straight line from exterior wall to exterior wall except where the application of this requirement would not permit construction of an eight hundred square foot ADU with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks. Existing accessory structures converted to an ADU shall not be required to meet this standard. C. Design and Features. Design. The design for a detached ADU shall be selected from the City's pre - approved, "Permit Ready ADU" program or shall have the same materials and colors of the primary dwelling and shall comply with any objective design standards adopted by the City that are applicable to the zoning district or specific plan area where the ADU is located. Attached ADU's shall match the material and colors of the existing or proposed primary residence and shall comply with any objective design standards adopted by the City that are applicable to the zoning district or specific plan area where the ADU is located. 2. Fire Sprinklers. ADUs are required to provide fire sprinklers if they are required for the primary dwelling. The construction of an ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. 3. An ADU shall have a separate exterior access. D. Covenant Required. The property owner shall record a declaration of restrictions, in a form approved by the city attorney, placing the following restrictions on the property, the property owner, and all successors in interest: (1) the ADU is to be rented only for terms of thirty days or longer; and (2) the ADU is not to be sold or conveyed separately from the primary dwelling except as described above in Section 17.23.050(B)(3). Proof of recordation of the covenant shall be provided to the city before the city finals the building permit. E. Parking Requirements. 1. In addition to the off-street parking space(s) required for the primary dwelling, one off-street parking space shall be provided for each ADU, except when: a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit; b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district; c. The ADU is part of a proposed or existing primary dwelling or accessory structure; d. The ADU is located in an area where on -street parking permits are required but not offered to an ADU occupant; or e. The ADU is located within one block of a city -approved and dedicated parking space for a car share vehicle. 2. When the ADU is created by converting or demolishing a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space, replacement of parking space(s) eliminated by the construction of the ADU shall not be required as long as the ADU remains in use as a legal ADU. § 17.23.060. Fees and utility connections. A. ADUs and JADUs shall have adequate water and sewer services. These services may be provided from the water and sewer points of connection for the primary dwelling and not a separate set of services. B. The owner of an ADU or JADU shall be subject to the payment of all sewer, water and other applicable fees, including impact fees set forth in Government Code Section 66000 et seq., except as follows: 1. ADUs that are less than seven hundred fifty square feet shall not be subject to impact fees. 2. ADUs that are seven hundred fifty square feet or more shall be charged impact fees that are proportional in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. C. Prior to receiving a building permit, the owner of an ADU or JADU must submit letters of service availability for water and sewer disposal to the building official. 10 Section 3. Environmental Findings. Ordinance is exempt from the requirements o ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section The City Council hereby finds that this the California Environmental Quality Act 15282(h) which creates a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single-family or multifamily residential zone by a city to implement the provisions of Article 2 (commencing with Section 66314) or Article 3 (commencing with Section 66333) of Chapter 13 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code as set forth in Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code. In addition, the City Council finds that the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that amendments to the City's ADU and JADU regulations in accordance with State Law will have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Submission of Ordinance to HCD. In compliance with Government Code Section 66326, the Community Development Director is hereby directed to submit a copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days after adoption. Section 5. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Brenden Kalfus, Mayor M STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of May, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 12 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-07 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Zoning Code Related to Bedford Court Project (APN 922-210-042) (Planning Application Nos. PA23-0280, PA23-0204, PA23-0197, PA23-0198, and PA24-0348) (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE XVII (BEDFORD COURT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 16) (PA23-0280) TO CHAPTER 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT) TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM HIGHWAY TOURIST (HT) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 16 (PDO-16) ON A 1.88 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922- 210-042) AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING MAP BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinance No. 2025-07 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 13, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibits ORDINANCE NO.2025-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE XVII (BEDFORD COURT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 16) (PA23-0280) TO CHAPTER 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT) TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM HIGHWAY TOURIST (HT) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 16 (PDO-16) ON A 1.88 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042) AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 4, 2023, the applicant submitted Planning Application PA23-0197, a Development Plan, PA23-0198, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a car wash, PA23-0204, a Tentative Parcel Map to create two parcels from one existing parcel, and PA23-0280, a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay. On September 17, 2024 the applicant submitted PA24- 0348, a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a drive-thru. Taken together, the applications will permit for the development and operation of a commercial center consisting of two structures that will house a carwash and coffee shop. These applications (collectively "Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). D. The City contracted with De Novo Planning Group (De Novo) for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, De Novo concluded, and City staff concurred, that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, but that mitigation measures could be implemented to reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. Based upon this determination, De Novo prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Draft MND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Draft MND was subsequently circulated, comments were received, and responses to comments were prepared resulting in the preparation of the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration ("Final MND"). E. On April 16, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and considered the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 2025-10, 2025-11, 2025-12, 2025-13, 2025-14, and 2025-15, recommending that the City Council approve the Project and the Final MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. G. On May 13, 2025, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project, the Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project, Final MND, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prior to and at the public hearing. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-28 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE BEDFORD COURT PROJECT CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.88 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF BEDFORD COURT APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET SOUTHWEST OF THE TEMECULA PARKWAY AND BEDFORD COURT INTERSECTION (APN 922-210-042)". I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the hereby makes the following findings regarding the zone change: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Ordinance directly responds to Goal I Policies LU-1.1, and LU-1.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element. In addition to employing the City's planned development overlay zoning district tool, the proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goals and policies in that it: provides a mix of community -serving commercial uses; has been planned and evaluated for consistency with the General Plan and its implementing programs (e.g., the planned development overlay zoning district); and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required design guidelines, building orientation, circulation and access improvements, and other features and requirements of proposed Planned Development Overlay 16. Additionally, mitigation measures are identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to further reduce the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure. B. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the Municipal Code and Development Code for the City of Temecula; The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Ordinance is internally consistent with the Municipal Code and the Development Code in terms of referencing key components of these documents. Section 3. Zoning Code Amendment. The City Council hereby amends Chapter 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (PDO-16)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code by adding a new Article XVII, entitled "Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay District 16" to read as provided in Exhibit "A", attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as thought set forth in full. Section 4. Zoning Map Amendment. Based upon the findings contained in Section 2 of this Ordinance, the City Council hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula to change the zoning classification for the property located on 1.88 acres generally located at the southern end of Bedford Court approximately 160 feet southwest of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection (APN 922-210-042) from Highway Tourist (HT) to Planned Development Overlay (Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay-16). The amended Zoning Map is attached as Exhibit `B" to this Ordinance and is incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 6. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025-07 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of May, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Bedford Court PDO-1 6 Prepared For: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 951.694.6444 Property Owner: Catalyst Commercial Group 38605 Calistoga Drive, Suite 150 Murrieta, California 92563 951.395.0000 Mark Cooper Prepared By: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services, Inc. 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 951.265.5428 Matthew Fagan Angie Douvres In conjunction with: MMA Architecture Conceptual Design and Planning Company Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. April 2025 Bedford Court Table of Contents 17.22.002 TITLE 1 17.22.004 PURPOSE 1 17.22.006 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS 1 17.22.008 USE REGULATIONS 1 17.22.010 PDO-16 DESIGN STANDARDS 5 17.22.012 PROJECT SETTING 9 A. Setting and Location 9 B. Existing Site Conditions 9 C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development 9 17.22.014 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES 10 A. Architectural Design Guidelines 10 1. Overall Project Theme 10 2. Massing and Scale 10 3. Articulation of Design 10 B. General Site Design Guidelines 13 1. Building Plotting Concepts 13 2. Vehicular Circulation 13 3. Pedestrian Circulation 13 4. Lighting 14 5. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 17 6. Additional Site Design Parameters 17 a. Acoustical Buffers 17 b. Drive-Thrus/Screening 17 c. Trash Enclosures 18 d. Service, Loading, and Equipment Areas 18 e. Mechanical Equipment and Vents 23 17.22.016 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS 23 A. Landscape Elements 23 B. Project Entry and Edge Conditions 27 1. Bedford Court Project Entry 27 2. South Edge/Existing Residential 27 C. Walls and Fences 27 Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Bedford Court List of Figures Figure 1 Overall Site Plan 7 Figure 2 Conceptual Grading 8 Figure 3 Car Wash Elevation Examples 11 Figure 4 Coffee Shop Elevation Examples 12 Figure 5 Walkways and Pedestrian Linkages Plan 15 Figure 6 Lighting Examples 16 Figure 7 Trash Enclosures 21 Figure 8 Overall Landscape Plan 25 Figure 9 Plant Palette 26 Figure 10 Bedford Court/Project Entry 29 Figure 11 a South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Car Wash) 30 Figure 11 b South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Coffee Shop) 31 Figure 12 Wall and Fence Plan 32 List of Tables Table 1 Schedule of Permitted Uses 2 Table 2 Development Standards Bedford Court PDO-16 5 Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) ii Bedford Court 17.22.002 TITLE Section 17.22.002 through 17.22.016 shall be known as "PDO-16" (Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay District). (Ord ) 17.22.004 PURPOSE The purpose of the Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay District ("PDO-16") is to permit creative mixtures of uses in smaller areas where a specific plan or the village center overlay is not appropriate. The planned development overlay zoning district is intended to provide a mechanism to allow for flexibility in the development regulations and design standards and to allow mixtures of uses and clustering of land uses that are traditionally prohibited by conventional zoning. Through this flexibility in standards, many of the objectives of the General Plan can best be achieved. These requirements are intended to provide regulations for the development of primarily local -serving commercial uses, in a manner that is respectful to adjacent development. The Project will contain site -specific development standards and design guidelines which will include buffers and screening to the existing single-family residential units located to the south of the Project site. 17.22.006 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS A. The permitted uses for the Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay District are described in Section 17.22.008. B. Except as modified by the provisions of Sections 17.22.008, 17.22.010, 17.22.012, or 17.22.016, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area: 1. The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 2. The approval requirements contained in the Municipal Code that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. 3. Temecula Objective Design Standards for Multifamily and Mixed -Use Developments. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation, or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. (Ord. 07-03 § 3) 17.22.008 USE REGULATIONS PDO-16 is located at the terminus of Bedford Court, easterly of the 1-15 freeway, and westerly of Temecula Parkway, and is intended to provide for the development of primarily local -serving commercial uses on approximately 1.88 gross acres. PDO-16 is designed with common architectural massing and materials, a complementary color palette, and with consistent landscaping throughout the site, which will result in a comprehensive and cohesive development. PDO-16 will provide for a visually pleasing environment through adoption of supplemental performance standards that have been provided to ensure compatibility with the adjacent neighborhoods in terms of scale and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Bedford Court will be integrated into the existing development fabric by means of architectural theming, as well as buffering and setback requirements that go beyond those permitted by the underlying zoning designation, especially those pertaining to a car wash. Table 1, Schedule of Permitted Uses, depicts the permitted and conditionally permitted uses that are allowed in PDO-16. Permitted uses are shown as a "P," conditionally permitted uses are shown as a "C." Table 1 Schedule of Permitted Uses Description of Use A Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft.) P Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) P Antique restoration C Antique sales P Apparel and accessory shops P Arcades (pinball and video games)' C Art supply stores P Automobile oil change/lube services with no major repairs P Automotive parts -sales P Automobile rental C Automobile repair services C Automobile sales (wholesale or auto broker only) with no outdoor/storage of vehicles C Automobile sales with only indoor display/storage of vehicles C Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash' P Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine- with or without an automated car wash' C B Bakery retail P Bank and financial institutions' P Barber and beauty shops P Beer and wine market' C Bicycle sales, rental, services P Billiard parlor/pool hall',2 C Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P Bookstores P Bowling alley' P Butcher shop P C Candy/confectioneryCandy/confectionery sales P Car wash, full service' C Car wash, automated' C Community care facilities P Congregate care housing for the elder) '.3 P Convenience market' C Cutlery P Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Bedford Court Table 1 Schedule of Permitted Uses Description of Use D Daycare centers P Delicatessen P Drug store/pharmacystore/pharmacy P Dry cleaners P E Emergency shelters C Equipment sales and rentals no outdoor storage) P F Fire and police stations P Floor covering sales P Florist P Fortunetellin , or similar activity P G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service P General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 s . ft. P Glass and mirrors, retail sales P Grocery store, retail' P H Health and exercise clubs less than 5,000 s . ft. P Health care facility P Health food store P Hobby supply shop P I Ice cream parlor P Interior decorating service P L Laundromat P Libraries, museums, and galleries (private) C Locksmith P M Massage P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C Medical equipment sales/rental P Musical and recording studio C N Nursing homes/convalescent homes C O Office equipment/supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative, corporate headquarters and professional services including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate and insurance P P Paint and wallpaper stores P Parcel delivery services P Parking lots and parking structures C Pawnshop P Personal service shops P Pet grooming/pet shop P Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Bedford Court Table 1 Schedule of Permitted Uses Description of Use Photographic studio P Postal services P Private utility facilities (regulated by Public Utilities Commission P R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P Recreational vehicle parks C Recreational vehicle sales and rentals C Religious institution, without a daycare or educational institution P Religious institution, with an educational institution C Religious institution, with a daycare center C Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business C Restaurant with drive-thru/fast food C Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) either without alcohol or with beer/wine only P Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with distilled spirits' C Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with entertainment not including dancing)' 2 P Restaurant (bona fide public eating establishment) with entertainment and/or dancing' 2 P S Schools, trade or vocational P Senior citizen housing see also congregate care 3 P Specialty market P Sports and recreation facility C T Taxi or limousine service P Tobacco shop P TV -VCR repair P W Watch repair P Wedding chapels P Wine tasting, with or without product sale for off -site consumption (Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 02 only) P Wine tasting shop, with or without product sale for off -site consumption (Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Types other than Type 02 C 'Subject to the supplemental development standards contained in Chapter 17.09 of the City's Municipal Code. 2Subject to Chapter 9.10 (Entertainment License) and Chapter 9.11 (Regulation of Private Security Operators). 3Senior housing residential projects shall use the residential performance and development standards for the high -density residential zone. Congregate care facilities shall use the residential performance standards. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 4 Bedford Court 17.22.010 PDO-16 DESIGN STANDARDS PDO-16 proposes one Planning Area, as depicted on Figure 1, Overall Site Plan. PDO- 16 will be relatively close in grade to the existing Bedford Court roadway. Reference Figure 2, Conceptual Grading. PDO-16 shall comply with the development standards set forth in Table 2, Development Standards Bedford Court PDO-16. Table 2 Development Standards Bedford Court PDO-16 LOT AREA Minimum gross area of site 0.50 acres Target floor area ratio .06 Floor area ratio range .03 - .06 Maximum floor area ratio with intensity bonus as per Section 1.0 17.08.050 of the Cit 's Municipal Code Minimum front yard adjacent to a street 20' Minimum yard adjacent to residentially zoned property 30' Minimum interior side yard 0' Minimum rear yard 10, Minimum accessory structure - side/rear setback 5' Minimum car wash to closest residential property line 75'* Minimum building separation: One story 15' Two story 20 Three stories or more 25 Maximum building height' 3012 Maximum wall height 613 Maximum percent of lot coverage 10% Minimum required landscaped open space4 25% ' Height limits do not apply to masts, belfries, clock towers, chimney flues, elevator bulkheads, etc., provided they are located further than 50' from adjacent residences. 2 Accessory structure height shall not exceed 20'. 3Unless otherwise specified in any applicable noise study. 4 Minimum required landscaped open space area does not include any necessary planting within the right- of-way. * Project will incorporate design features that will ensure compliance with City's Noise Ordinance requirements for external and internal noise standards. PDO-16 Parking Requirements The following parking requirements shall apply to PDO-16: Parking requirements for PDO-16 shall be determined based on the specific use listed in Table 1, above, in accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.24.040, unless otherwise specified below. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Bedford Court The following requirements shall apply for drive-thru restaurants: One (1) parking space/75 s.f. (gross) is required for drive-thru restaurants. (Note: patios are not counted in the parking calculation.) Required Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) spaces, electric vehicle (EV) charging station spaces, and motorcycle stalls shall be provided. The following requirements shall apply for car washes: The maximum number of vehicles allowed in the wash tunnel x 2.5 is the requirement for a car wash. Parking spaces shall include spaces for short-term parking associated with drying and vacuuming vehicles, required ADA drying and vacuuming spaces, and required EV charging station spaces. Reciprocal access and parking shall be provided throughout PDO-16. A reciprocal access and parking agreement shall be approved by the City, and recorded against the property, prior to the recordation of a final map. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) EXISFTNG Y BLDG. i G. .s ;x: :.. �• R yy i� _ ,_ �' s `•-:'� a �� ���.::::.;;•. •:.•., i44 '-�-�. � 4 }BEDFORD I y� _ 41 as 9 1' 0 44 73 _ PROPOSE[] � $ ':; ';•ray''.. rw_,... . o ,( a PARCEL 1 .'. j:. � � - : � t .. \ xi • '•' � C"i`" � i; a:::•:.::'. 4 M 1Q ±52,139SF :;•' 6.:i::;i �:.'.e' s6 _L 20STALLS a,•' ":;_: cr3- -�., `� ... 34'.4? 12' (} h ,18 r 7 1 BLDG e e J T n li i:'•;i a ryr 15STALLS- o t .:•:�•;'j:: •:.. � - 1® c .. PROPOSED rl QZ PROPOSED O { ••�;•: 37 ) PARCEL2 `7 ! I BLDG. t29,758 S-F $ (*-6-68 ACj F b 1 i �Yf •'.•',. •-'.•:: ;::,::•:•$�• _ IrkL7, 16 "•i O— i� ii •!f :;•\ ice'-':•• '., - - � C' f:. " ) AY ..I. Y. '•::7..:, :::•:•:•:';• r • •.,ti'. 1 N t10• lv ,��'.::;... .i• li i F II 1 I i i it • :.ry irC.. .+mr v P7 t-: ::�•, tom-•'' � � + 1 1 � 02 o * � •-:�•: _ :E a a2 92 I 7 �I ' :'tr: : 4 y {I• �291 EXISTING # NG RESIDENTIAL KESI NTIAL Aw r 1 X r CT. rrr 17; _ EXISTING ( GAS STATION t� N2 Fa IS' q A' Af r ! 0 r *_ . i BEDFORD COURT /V E%ISTINGKEY NOTES PROP 5T [1��j kEW 11. ( ) xEW PAINTED D15AHLED SYMBOL A� NEW DISABLED SIGN /�J NEW PLANTER f�6) NEW Gl7]'TER ( 1 )1 xEw CURE B NEW' SHORT TERM C@CE RACKS 4 BICYCLES) In, kEW LONG TERN BIKE STORAGE PROVIDED:2 81CYCLES(2 SINGLE LOCKERS) ( 7p) NEW CONCRETE PAVING- ACID WASH FINISH. SAW CDT LINES. `J COLOR: NATl1RAL GRAY NEW RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOME ,2 NEW ACCESSIBLE PARYJNG STN I-c ,3 NEW DIRECTIONAL SIGN (SIGN BY OTHERS) L ,, NEW WAITS GO SIGN 15 NEW BOLLARD IIy —CURB cLD 10, NEW METAL CANOPY 4g CONDU IT FOR —RE CHARGING S 011 iV FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALL (a) (pp) .—Ill. UEHiCLE CHARGING S7ALL (21 pII NEW TRANSFORMER 2p NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH ROOF NEW LJ DRIVE-THRI,-NDOW NEW DOUBLE OVERHEAD CLEARANCE9AR V` 25' NEW' 1 E 1 B-11 P� PROPOSED FLAG POLE LOCATION \�-1-14GHEADWALLTOREMAIN_ AVOIDANCEAREA. 28 EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING 20 FT. EASEMENT FOR SEWER AND ROAD PURPOSES. [ 3p) EXISTING 24 FT. EASEMENT FOR DRAT NAGE AND VV INCIDENTAL PDRPOSES- 35, EXISTING EASEMENT FOR M -R OF WAY FOR UNDERGROUND JJ ELECTRICAL SUPPY SYSTEMS AND CGMMU NICATION SYSTEMS AND FREE ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. `311 E%ISDNG SCREEN WALL TO REMAIN JJ 33) PROPOSED VACUUM ENCLOSURE 34 NEW VACUUM CANOPY 35 NEW MENU BOARD 36 NEW' STRIPING PAINT'OO NOT ENTER" 37 NEW PAY CANOPY 3S NEW 11NDERGRIXIND GREASE INTERCEPTCIR C37 NEW PAVEMENT MARKING d9 NEW DISPLAY PRICE SIGN A, PROFUSE. PARCEL LINE d2 EXISTING SWR VLT. d3 NEW MOTORCYCLE STALL (AA NEW LOW MASONRY ENTRY ACCENT WALLS WITH LOW FLOWERING GROUND COVER. ( L51 NEW ENHANCE PAVING d6 NEW DIAMOND PLANTER WITH 51. S' CLEAR PLANTING AREA 47. EXISTING,OFT. EASEMENT FOR ORAI NAGE PURPOSES. AS PROPOSED B' FIRE HYDRANT (Q PROPOSED B'DGDA FIGURE 1 - OVERALL SITE PLAN Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 7 BEDFORD COURT 1018.58 EG EXISTING COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL ° DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE APN: 922-210-045 APN: 922-210-050 1016.19 EG °;"g 1 7 N.A.P. N.A.P. 'p'8 �, 978'Og•• EXISTING RETAINING 1016.Q2 EG ! E WALL TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINE EXISTING HEADWALL TO REMAIN 1015.98 EG /! w 14 1015.85 TC 1016.00 FG 1015.35 TP 1015.. 1015 01 FL-TG_. 1014.50 !. 1016.27 TC ` '1O1B 7 1D15.77TP- 1016.56 TC , . 1016.34.F5 18 f---1020.22F5 - '� '1 Q 1016.06 TP ti G 1 1 74 FS 101fi.63.FS �- 102D.25 TC -- 1019.75:7P 0" CURB Q•, •'>�,.��� Ge �� '0". - 102.13 TC. 1020.32 FS LEGEND �\� - 1D19.63TP R=49.00' l Gg ¢ h L-86.12' PROP, DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD 207A - PROPERTY LINE 1016, 39 TC o - ,2�u * ' 1019.13 TC �' • 1015. 89 TP - 2 1 1019, 24 FS BEDFORD COURT 1018.63 TP1 016.74Fc f' %. • ,9 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINEy -r . �1' ' • a 1019.31TC 0" Ci1RB ioi�3oFs G1s.s1rP QZD.11Fs CIVIL LIMITS OF WORK 0 CURB ". 10i B. 51 FS �`�asC��. = - •: j 0" CURB o EGRESS/EXIT ONLY 019-30 FS R-333.00' PROP. MODIFIED DRIVEWAY PER EASEMENT 1019.23TC L=65.OS' CITY STD 207A AQ on i� -,, - 1019.23FS IC18,73TP 16 _ - x- X SLOPE o. _ - 1019. 7.3'TC 1019.20 TC Pl EXISTING RETAINING -//^ - .�O'`� -.'`V �',"� 1G38.73 TP !, 1018.70 TP. IQ20-21 FS WALL TO REMAIN o. J Q O ^ / \ �' 1020.08 FS 120' p018 03BFS 3017.34 EG y , STANDARd DUTY CONCRETE 56EWALIC CIVIL LIMITS OF WORK / ! (� 3 ^ ry / 1020.01-FS 1016.92 EG G} r2 of CIO 101210 FF / 0" CURB ..1019 89 FS' _ 1Q17.67Tc HEADY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT ^ ^ O a / 1019.25 TC 1019,80 FS 1017.17 TP-TG PROPERTY LINE/ / 1 ���4� SEE DETAIL 1, / t018.75 TP jOp .1018TC/ o' o� a �O : / SHEET Cz °1 ! , 1o17-a4 TP - - 1Q18.39TC STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT _ h/ / ♦. - s 11019-33 TC - 1017.89 TP-TG 07 / / �, �� 1018-83 TP--1019.72 FS_r� 't018.89ITC °D, O Q I ��o I� 1D19.79Fs 1018.39TP LANDSCAPE/PLANTER AREA 2 1018.:14 TC �C Q SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET C2 1018.04 TP / p ' _ - - • 1019-80 FS it . I[[ 1J /� A/ SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET C2 T �I, PROPERTY LINE DETECTABLE WARNINGS Q 1018-fit FS � / � \ / F 1019.20,TC N31-18'40"W xx*:_xx TC �,1o1a3aFL-HP yo o G19,ac'rc PROPOSED ELEVATION n 017,70TP Q 151,50 �� J � 1019,30 TP _ I. �+'�xx•}�}i TP 1017.75EG .•.� t �.� G� 1.. ` �[�. 1019.03`TC m � I- f n �- ° z.sgE I. (!XXXX.XX TO) EXISTING ELEVATION / g - 1018,53�TP v/ 0 1017.83 EG l ! 1019-13,FF / / ' O L - 101859 TP ,III, (XXXX.XX TP) 1018.99TC - lL °J'. i018.90TP .4.0' ,. 11 C1 B.49tTP SEE DETAIL 2 EE SHT C2 - j 180 F 01 a,90 TC _ / v / 1018,•'.0 T- 1019 50 FS 1Q19 S• 1. ABUTTER'S RIGHTS a 1019.80 FF vg- 16 RELINQUISHED../n / '�-1018.81 TC �• -- 101935 FS _' 1019,72 TC .1018.92 TO 1018.31 TP ' ° 1019 10 FS . 1019.65 FS 1019, 22 TP 018.42 TP D" CURB 1 - u� 1018.9FTC 1019 18 FS. - 1019,63 TC 1018.41 TP �. 101 8-57 TC A ' • �9 / / 1078 99 TC� 6 r� 0 1020.60 F5 1019.71 F5 1019.29 TC 'T v Xe' 1018-52 TG f 1018.74 jr.1019.19 TC EXISTING CURB 1018 -071TP/ 1018.49 TP rn'1D1915 F5.10196&FS 1018-79 TP 1018.69 TP 1018.02 TP v 1078.24 TP - TO REMAIN ..� , • _ . 1018.45 TC TOTS 98 FS - �Sg1018.60 TC G' CURD 101907�F5,, 1019.18 TO II•' 018 72 TC of 038_.45 TP + 6 ', 101 a22 TP _ _ ' - T 1018.101TF V 101 S 86 F5 - 1019,03 FS 1018.68 TP 1� 1017-82 EG r •1016.90FL 1018.51 TC� `tea1018.74- I 1019.58iTC - 1018-11 TP 1019.01 TC TC 101 B.10 TG U 1018,93 TC 1019.10 TC 1019 06 TC m �5% 101 9.49 TC 1019.08 TP 1018.51 TP 1 1 C18.24 TP 101 7 60 TP 101 U.94 FS 1018.43 TP 1018.60 TP, 1018.56 TP 1018.99 TP 10i8.74TC 10I 8-57 TC 1018. B1 TC 20-0' 1 D7 9.13 TC �' 1019. 50 TC 1018.98 TC/ A° 1018.07 TP 1 Q18 31 TP 2 / . - -, 1018.24 TP - 1019 D3 TC °° 1017.67.TC 18 1018.63 TP 101 % - TP 1018.48 TP J 1018.77 TO 0 , CURB 0" CURB] TOTS 53 TP �7 1017.47 TC 1017.17T_P�\\\\\ry { 1018.27 TP ]Oi9-=-1019.06 TC 1018.22FS 1018.31 FS10192fi�TC 1016.97 TP-.TC 1018. 45TC 1018.72TG ia� �i r0 .: - TOTS 76'Tp1017-95 TP 1018-22 TPI018-45 TC •}�' 8 1018. 56 TP '•. ° 101.62 TC_ _ _ _ _ _ IN l �,- 7 018 p __ 1017.95 TP - -1077 0' CURB 1018.42TC 1018.28 FS '1037.52:FL 1017.17TP 1017.67 TC 1018.b3 F5 1 p� " 1017.92 TP LP '! , 1017.17 TP-TG <- 'c T-.- 4 ' G - G '_ C ' ? . - > - D a o - - _ _ T '. _ 1.'. 707g 1015.93 FL TG 0 18 - 0" CURB - t018.53 FS - 1018.89 TC. - 1O1 . a (i 8� / 1018.26 FS 018.39 TP ':1017-14FL -TC 1I017.91 EG -,1018.51Fs 1018.8D F5. 0EG °�s'• 7�r"� 1011.26FL o 7✓.• '.• ti(A T _ • %:� - - - 418.03 �.- - - - �• Otis N58.40'13CE 1016.23 EG 1017.01 EG 1017.33 EG 1017.47'EG 1017.83EG 1018.27'EG 1019.10 EG) Q 018.11 EC PROPERTY LINE �•01829 EG �" t EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY EXISTING SCREEN EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY CIVIL LIMITS OF WORK EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY y LOT 1 WALL TO REMAIN LOT 2 LOT 3 TRACT NO. 13805 TRACT NO. 13805 TRACT NO. 13805 M.B. 10713-4 M.B. 10713-4 M.B. 10713-4 N.A.P. N.A.P. N.A.P. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) FIGURE 2 - CONCEPTUAL GRADING 8 Bedford Court 17.22.012 PROJECT SETTING A. Setting and Location PDO-16 is comprised of approximately 1.88 gross acres located at the terminus of Bedford Court, easterly of the 1-15 freeway, and westerly of Temecula Parkway. B. Existing Site Conditions The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The project site is relatively flat with no areas of topographic relief. On -site elevation ranges from 1,014 to 1,025 feet above mean sea level. Soils on -site have been mechanically disturbed and heavily compacted from historic land uses (i.e., grading, routine weed abatement, illegal dumping, staging and stockpiling activities, and surrounding development). Drainage within the subject property generally flows to the west. C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development PDO-16 is bordered by High Density housing to the south, Highway Tourist Commercial to the immediate east and PDO-14 to the east across Temecula Parkway, Highway Tourist Commercial to the north, and 1-15 to the west. The PDO-16 Project site is shown as the black bordered area in the aerial photo below. PDO-16 Site and Surrounding Land Uses 1) Source: Map My County httos://ois1.countvofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=MMC Public Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 9 Bedford Court 17.22.014 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Overall Project Theme PDO-16 has been designed by taking inspiration from a Contemporary Agrarian architectural style. This building style tends to focus on incorporating local materials into structures with farmhouse elements that are often rustic, organic, and comfortable, as conceptualized in Figure 3, Car Wash Elevation Examples and Figure 4, Coffee Shop Elevation Examples. The buildings are designed with common architectural massing and materials and a complementary color palette. The elements used reflect the City of Temecula Design Guideline requirements, while at the same time allowing for the ease of brand identification. Additional details are included below. When all of these architectural guidelines are utilized together, the comprehensive essence of PDO-16 will be attained. 2. Massing and Scale Building massing and scale should be sensitive to the existing built environment and shall be designed in a manner that compliments the existing development and the development within PDO-16. Buildings within PDO-16 may be up to 30' in height (as measured from finished pad elevation. Internal to the Project, buildings shall be sited in such a manner as to not impede, or seem to dominate, the adjacent buildings. 3. Articulation of Design • The building design shall incorporate 360' architecture. • Architectural elements that add interest and character to the prescribed architectural styles, such as recessed windows and shade canopies, shall be provided. • High quality materials shall be used to create a look of permanence and a contemporary nature within PDO-16. Variations in color and material consistent with the standards established in Figure 3, Car Wash Elevation Examples and Figure 4, Coffee Shop Elevation Examples shall be utilized to create interest and reduce a monotonous appearance. • Fixtures and finishes will be selected for their contribution to the overall theme of the development. The building design shall incorporate 3600 architecture. 3600 architecture means the appropriate articulation of all building facades, including variation in massing, roof forms, and wall planes, as well as surface articulation to create shadow patterns and massing shapes that contribute to a building's character. It is expected that the highest level of articulation will occur on the front fagade and facades visible from streets; however, similar and complementary massing, materials, and details are encouraged to be incorporated into the other building elevations. The use of elements such as overhangs, trellises, and awnings will be used to lend character to the building. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 10 EAST ELEVATION BEDFORD COURT 29'-a' T6--- 22'-4' 4'T.O. WINDOW 4'T.O. TREWS r o. wINE1ow 3'-4" _ WAINSCOT F� IN, FLOOR T 6�PARAPI T� D PARAPI T4' 0 PLASTE 10. —W1 INoa' OTQ WAIw '-0' N FLOOR AA+14' 8' T.o ET— T�+S'-4' SEOT 0'-O' FIN. FLOOR NORTH ELEVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 7.0. PAWIPET 3 " +15'-4" — — — T.O r6R ET TOPAPPP[T PREPAY WINDOW CANOPY PAPPAY 1WN K'NY C/Sf )1 FIN, FLOOR � �� SOUTH ELEVATION +2 T O.PARAPETAPET _ sB-8" T.O. PARAP 14'-6-6" T.D. PARAPEFY FIN WEST ELEVATION _ _ 2 1 T, O. RDOF TO. PARAPET CMU -0-3 56.'$ 08 FIN. FLOG. 1 All' 12-7 CMU CPfNpd Flp FLO[Y1`F MATERIALS (—j ACRYLIC PLASTER, SAND FINISH METAL WALL CANOPY SYSTEM STONE VENEER SILL 4 FAUX WINDOW ASSEMBLY WITH BLACK CERAMIC FAIT TEMPERER SPANDREL GLASS DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE eAWMINUM CANOPY eSTONE VENEER 8 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM Q 3-INCH WIOL x 114-INCH DEEP CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM PLASTERREVFAL 10 METAL FASCIA 1t PANEL BOARD 12 METAL DOOR 13 VACUUM CANOPY 14 METAL SIDING FINISHES eCORONADO STONE-"VIEJDPANCH' --.-- - eCORONADO STONE SILL -"LIGHT GRAY' SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7064--SNOWBOUND' SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6374-'TORCHUGHI" SHERWIN WILLIAMS SWO038-"U6R0.RY PEWTER' eSHERWIN WILLIAMS SWOD73-PERFECT GREfGE" ( j STEEL BUILDING GQPPLY -LIGHT GRAr' e.11.131E PANEL HOAR.-'CHESTNLJT BROWN" eBERRIDGE WEATHER GALVALUME.'CHARCOALGREY FIGURE 3 - CAR WASH ELEVATION EXAMPLES 11 WALK UP WINDOW ELEVATION WEST PRE-FNl9H® PAPPPEf CAP FIA9HING 89TK;C0 CORM LINE OFOEo FTOP VE`YITS8B m COLOR 1b M0.TCIR 2 fit. PHRPPET a �+2i$ +.0. P uDNrrm 9I9w, ' NCMAL DYCIGN CONTN Mn, D Dp COOREIN4TE WAFT ELEEMICPL O 1 1ROX MIT BLOCKING REQUVR ENM SIDMSssTEu II I 1A I FRAMED CM 1 +OP0.MPET METAL AWNNO 0 CAI Pf CCUIM � �SEE1)ETNL2?A}.0 00 +WNNG CANOPY d DPYPOFFIT - 5 siwNGsr-TF_N CCO CORNICE. CQOR TO MATCH 1C I I 4 � •0� T O. SERVICE Cd ER 2-1P LEp ME. BOARp Eq2 TO 9AB oa PHEF4i81l�PARIPET GaP FL48HM3 OOiAp Tp 4YTTO 4►1 16 PTA-FNIBiEI} R°WPET OM FIA&iNG R - 91DN6� 1 /� �1 � SIOOCtr rbRNCE, L1hiM RSW� � DasrA,J..ED EH ex3N c,'xFrll,'TIRncTOR. LW N WRH ELECRTCM ox AND&ELAC�M6 REfiUF9JENTE: L� 4� u 4�uu - —EFW&WPAWE' ca.oRrowT�Y �B ®DNF 3YSfE0.1— iB LED NEWJ D � - - -- M- a 1 To Q�F./ELOLY ST1T1}✓8(]1T. COOfa lK'PLliL1�IG DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW ELEVATION EAST PRERNSH® PARAPET � CAP FLASHING TRIIICCO COR COLOR TO MATCH 2 t�0. 18 OCO CORNICE, C-0EON TO MATCH iC m+per �sIOING srs1EM 16 LIGHTED SIGPf INSTALLED BY 7 77— COORNNATE WRH ELECTRICN_ _ �E J-R01(ANC DLOCJSNG REQUREMETITC FIISMIHCi & SNOOD H CORNCE, COLOR TO MATCH 2 T.D/TIt`P IrETAL AWNING, � SEE DEfNL 2/A4.0 MEERLAWNNG, B.O CANOPi & SEE DETAIL 2M.0 r✓G �+1VS - - _ = scoucEUGNrs, - -- @-P B.O. OF 3%2 METAL DVM4GPOUT Wf -- - - - REgOIREp; REFERTOlv'11 ._- _ - MA PoRADDIIIONAL NFOFMATION QLERFLOW DOWN:POlf[, +p 1 - - COLOR: OBTCH ET✓OS. BLUE �+0d- PRERAiP]-ED wrLwET GW FL 0 W caaRTo LaTCN� TINE CF PwrTO+r LW G U:>w. 9Frr].DEb FR04AVeN A+fiAltin uc-rlrm slreN. �TeLLm e. mr,N E.]NfR ki-ia]OF BLOVAIN ELE"IPoCpL J80.0 +d�U ALOCWl3 TO Pfht��F FBCUtl1ECENTB �+b7iGF� ri iy r� anHe ararv3T RET!'L ANTICii TO G*AD T G �E DErHL xw.T o na ' TO B*LF _ �! FCI'Rllm TET 1r,caLllsc� 1 _ - -F - � - IE3481ll BDUYIO arrrr{L.Lce sRfL sETrxs ranr. R1fCJH raeoa FIFNGi4Tl O]IR RLCT01 IIRTJy 1 � P F E BOIaPADx1Tn PLhSW SLEEVE. �T 1 CC1AR OIJTCHBU6. aLE ELT � hT41E'fEH=P Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) BEDFORD COURT FRONT ELEVATION NORTH UNE OF ROOFTOP LTATS MYOFID. SHIEL➢ED FROM NEJJ PNiAPEF PTEfIN9NED PAMPETGP FLATHiNG 6 COM CF COLORTO MATCH iC �DNG DYSTEM — D „O o O .�VJ 1 i�srR�Fu v _____ xpprEss Nlm,IJETes. -12 ABLY FONT -25TRONE 9ATMALOM. FIRM f FA9CW -YENkFV FlNAL LOCRTION 1 CANOPY T.O. CANOPY 6-0' B.O. OFF �� R%IIkIEC,IYP / �/ � /v CANOPY CCI_I1N1� LXC OF ROOF 1CP NEB � o-n�•+aw xcx •xAn� vcwC 11KE G5PrIa9wKA BT1rCO OFigJtC£ COL9RAV Na c era IC -- W77M NtiL MEihT.6- LIOPR fIXILR DE•YPS npRE.TaryTEO� ET>ooTasnvnen� RQ LLSTCN COG TO WTON —CE3 C EXTEWR FINISH SCHEDULE V Toa 0-mim---F rwuMMM Nona FJNARU 1imm IA EiTEF*3RC8VE31ff k4BTER $K�MI ww"5 SrfT15-+<iITIq"Ww 1,D3A7 fSTEN W MARK REEILM aLNG1F1?9m: PE4EALRAH SHOWN .9 TT@ERwEW71TWt& FUpDE PaNEL OWED 4;wMTNUT ERGYN PENTaTV4' ERTrX TC P#iirT^_4 ACQMCE COLOR Tip WATCH CuARM+z.OFa54 a4FR i F191'IRI = f11LNGq}.gyTY6QIaG N[MI45 LLI1M�{+TION.—" 5H TAUKHYPOYELO9PNEK8 i`,gQkP.6�4F+u r Nra 4 R'-T w5i 79qwVMRdi 0Dft0wA o V0K 4TtJ611AX R &TOYEvmEER81LL {AFa7mwaTONE CHBElEDWOME RILL CLYCRWHFoREY LGFI+IMLY� TJfi6FTT} 4 HPLi+ � sTT.T�6 YI N. LEF1i1 FASM CaLOR lip W4TON {?141R�Y1LflRkY 5 ecFwr F&W ELENEffM 1 tJOL. T36, r IOr.LL R CaL*" WROWMWDNE 4iM RNIM VENEER �EOPiYJRT Or •1��N0.# BT41�7407WCE uGrTa sWTcu s -L1611m YO{ Il�u i •n m Sa1 {a7FmuC34R m6aM,ic5wR1ZG[[igLL ,.�a.+rnaacwp PWIwLE`Ei1T8 Y6T+LA�11' e¢TJ¢tiaxaa 1 �'/ULLl10Llf® LIQ,FRMTUE REAR ELEVATION SOUTH FIGURE 4 - COFFEE SHOP ELEVATION EXAMPLES 12 Bedford Court B. General Site Design Guidelines These general site design guidelines are not intended to restrict taste or preference but are designed to foster harmony of development. Various site design elements elements/concepts shall be considered to create a high -quality commercial development. In order to encourage a higher level of design direction and quality, the site design elements have been included in PDO-16 and are discussed in greater detail below: • Building Plotting Concepts • Streetscapes • Vehicular Circulation • Pedestrian Circulation • Lighting • Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Reference Figure 1, Overall Site Plan, as well as the Figures in Section 17.22.016 (Landscape Design Standards) of PDO-16. 1. Building Plotting Concepts Building masses should be articulated to avoid long straight building facades and create enclosed patios and pedestrian spaces where possible. The plotting of buildings shall take into account shade elements and maximize shade created by surrounding buildings. 2. Vehicular Circulation Vehicles enter the Project site via Bedford Court and may travel throughout the site in two directions via a loop system. Directional signage for drive-thrus shall be provided. Uses within the site shall take access off of the Project circulation loop/roadway. Circulation throughout the site shall comply with applicable Building and Fire codes and stacking shall comply with any queueing analyses prepared for the uses. Focal elements, which provide a sense of arrival, are incorporated into the design of the Project entry. These elements include but are not limited to enhanced landscaping and monumentation. Incorporation of these elements will ensure a sense of vehicular arrival to PDO-16. Landscaping shall be incorporated to soften the impact of paved areas. This will be accomplished through the use of elements such as, but not limited to, shading, accents, and other green elements. Low freestanding walls incorporating simple, tasteful signage with pilasters, balustrades, finials and other embellishments may be proposed. All driveway dimensions, with the exception of those adjacent to any mid -rise structures, shall be a minimum of 24' wide. Dimensions for driveways adjacent to mid - rise structures shall comply with Building Code requirements. 3. Pedestrian Circulation A pedestrian circulation system, interconnected by ADA compliant walkways and sidewalks, shall be provided consistent with Figure 5, Walkways and Pedestrian Linkages Plan. Decorative hardscapes shall be provided at the Project entry and at pedestrian crossings consistent with Figure 8, Overall Landscape Plan. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 13 Bedford Court 4. Lighting Exterior lighting can provide safe and effective evening character illumination for the pedestrian and vehicular areas of drive aisles, sidewalks, and walkways through PDO-16. Design should reflect the concept and character of PDO-16 through illumination level, light fixture type, finish color and location. Residential Interface Special attention shall be paid to the interface of PDO-16 and the existing residences to the south. A variety of lighting methods shall be employed in order to retain the existing nighttime views of these residents. This can be accomplished through the following methods: • Use low level bollards on -site for portions of the Project site that are adjacent to the residences. • Fully shield all lights that are taller than bollards. On -site lighting shall comply with the following: • The level of on -site lighting shall comply with any and all applicable requirements of the City of Temecula and the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. • All exterior lighting fixtures shall be consistent with the architectural style for the building that it serves. • Lighting shall be low-voltage/high-efficiency whenever possible. • Lights shall be focused downward to ensure pedestrian safety and way finding. • Footpath lights are acceptable as a means to illuminate a secondary path. • Inset stairway and stair step lights are encouraged to ensure pedestrian safety and way -finding. • Building mounted lighting fixtures shall be selected and located to cast downward and be shielded to minimize glare. • Accent lighting shall emphasize special features such as fountains (only allowed with reclaimed or recycled water), sculptures, wall niches, signs, planters or accent trees for decorative effects. • Accent lighting shall be inconspicuous and durable. • Small scale accent lights such as LED based fixtures can serve for way -finding or be used themselves as special design elements. • Flashing, neon, moving, high -intensity or exposed light source type luminaries are not permitted. Refer to Figure 6, Lighting Examples Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 14 Y • •�� ; T � #' T4 ryF k• J 1p + • , - �� y; . 4 -JAL r ++ F x� str f i T {�• 4 f r �• t + '�r r ;�4 r + f t� x L f *w •�r�•.►.R,Y.f /.?fir + 1 E 7 -e -1-i +�� �����, ll���,I�iTi 11��� 11E1« 1�1� - -7, v 1 it Accessible Concrete Walks � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � Existing City Sidewalk ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■��■ Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) FIGURE 5 - WALKWAYS AND PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES PLAN 15 BEDFORD COURT -+IrYT-.■pfIIIaI CANOPY LIGHTING: LINEAR LIGHTING: MOD'EL:SLED LINEAR LED FACADE FIXTURE TYPE:SLED2/F1 (2-FOOT) COLOR: PLATINUM SILVER DISTRIBUTION: DO NLIGHT ONLY BY;SECURITY LIGHTING WALL MOUNT FIXTURE SERIES SIZE- WS1 611 GV WALL MOUNTI NG- PA24 SHADE DIMENSION: 16" DIA. FINISH COLOR- BRUSHED ALUMINUM MANUFACTURER- RLM CLASSICS 26 WATT LED WALLPACK SECURITY LIGHT WITH EMERGENCY BACKUP BATTERY MODEL: WPLED26Y/E COLOR: BRONZE BY: IMPERIAL LIGHTING AREA LIGHT: MODEL: G LEON GALLEON COLOR: BRONZE BY: MCGRAW-ED ISO N MATRIX 4 SURFACE WALL MOUNTED COMPACT CUBIC MODEL: UMT-31426-DBNA/E COLOR: MATTE SILVER RAIL 9006 BY: LIGMAN LIGHTING NOTE: SIMILAR BRANDS/MODELS MAYBE USED PROVIDED THEY HAVE SIMILAR QUALITY AND MEET THE DESIGN INTENT FIGURE 6 - LIGHTING EXAMPLES Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 16 Bedford Court 5. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Ultimate design of PDO-16 will require compliance with City and State water quality requirements. Each implementing Project (i.e., Development Plan, Subdivision Map, or Conditional Use Permit) will require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). While it is known that a WQMP will be required, the exact nature and location of the WQMP components are not identified at this time. The following is a list of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that may be required for the subsequent development within PDO-16: • Filtration BMP. • Harvest & Use. • Self -Treated Areas. • Bio Retention Planters. 6. Additional Site Design Parameters The following are additional site design considerations that will be required within PDO- 16: a. Acoustical Buffers Acoustical buffers will be required for any car wash use. In order to reduce any noise impacts from these uses to the adjacent residences to the south, the following design features shall be required: • All blowers associated with drying vehicles and vacuums used for cleaning interiors of vehicles shall be oriented away from residences to the south. • All blowers shall be internalized. • Blowers shall utilize a muffler/silencer, shall meet or exceed current industry standards for noise reduction, and shall be implemented as required by any applicable noise study. • Absorptive material shall line the last 15' of the tunnel exit on the walls and ceiling and shall be implemented as required by any applicable noise study. • All noise emanating from the blowers and vacuums shall be lower than the City's threshold for noise at the property line for any residential sensitive receptor. b. Drive-Thrus Noise and light impacts from drive-thru operations within PDO-16 will be addressed through design and strategic siting of the noise and light generating activities. The existing screen wall, as currently constructed, is sufficient to prevent vehicle lights from impacting residences to the south. If any new walls are proposed in the future, they must also sufficiently screen vehicle lights. The following design features shall be required: • Drive-thrus shall be screened from the public right-of-way and from the residences to the south. If utilizing a speaker box, it shall be oriented away from the existing residences. • Landscape screening shall be provided along the property edges in order to provide additional means of reducing any potential noise and lighting impacts. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 17 Bedford Court • A pickup window canopy structure shall be provided. Canopies must be architecturally integrated and shall utilize similar materials as the other shade structures on site. Reference Figure 11 a, South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Car Wash) and Figure 11 b, South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Coffee Shop) provided in Section 17.22.016 (Landscape Design Standards) of PDO-16. c. Trash Enclosures The following design features, as depicted on Figure 7, Trash Enclosure, shall be required: • Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls with a minimum of 5' wide (interior clear dimension) planter and a 12" wide paved surface behind the curb to ensure adequate space is available for individuals to access a vehicle. • Trash/recycling containers should be large enough, placed frequently throughout the site, and collected frequently enough to handle the refuse generated by the Project. • Trash enclosures shall be designed with similar finishes, materials, and details as depicted on Figure 3, Car Wash Elevation Examples, and shall be screened with vines and landscaping. • Chain link fencing and gates with wood slats are not allowed. • Enclosures should be unobtrusive and conveniently located for trash disposal by tenants and for collection service vehicles. • A pedestrian entrance to the trash enclosure shall be provided so that large access doors do not have to be opened. • Enclosures shall not be visible from primary entry drives. • Enclosures shall have a concrete apron onto which trash/recycling containers will be rolled for collection. • All trash enclosures shall comply with the City of Temecula requirements. d. Service, Loading, and Equipment Areas The following Guidelines shall be implemented within PDO-16 as they pertain to service, loading and equipment areas in order to ensure that these functional site items are integrated with a sense and respect of the surrounding aesthetic: 1. Storage for supplies, merchandise, and similar materials shall be prohibited on the roofs of any buildings. 2. Merchandise, material, and equipment are not permitted to be stored to a height greater than any adjacent wall, fence, or building. 3. Service, loading, and storage areas shall be separated from pedestrian and private automobile circulation. 4. Service areas, loading docks, and equipment areas shall be screened from views either by locating these uses within a building or by screening them with landscaping, walls, fences, or other architectural treatments. 5. Any outdoor display ancillary to the business being conducted within the building may be permitted without a temporary use permit, provided that the display Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 18 Bedford Court complies with the regulations contained within Section 17.10.020 K. of the Supplemental Development Standards of the City's Municipal Code. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 19 Bedford Court This page left intentionally blank for pagination purposes. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 20 BEDFORD COURT CCR, LION' V STL. CkkNMEL ALL AROUND. P w COLOII TO WK,12m DERROW wEATHER GAYALYNIE tN ARC W L G RAY BATTEN BWRD SIOaB` HARDIEDOARO BATTEN BOARD smaJG COLOR: cHESTMfi 0RONH HAROIE 80ARA COAOIN00 STONE SRL COLOR: cHESTM3T BROWN: LIGHT MAY STONE VIENEER CORONAt10 STONE -YIEJG - .. RANCH -inElo OIEHO •f y FF.L_ r _ _ _ OF Fro TYP. STONE VEIEER COROIADO STONE • v112jO FIAJICH-VIEJO HLEN¢D. Rf QEV1RF A STL. CHANNEL ALL AROUN¢. PAINT COLOR TO MATCH BERRIDGE WEATIIE GAVALU E CHARCOAL GRAY BATTENBOARCSIDING BATTEN BOARD SIDING HIRDIE BOARD HARM BOARD COLOR: CHESTNIJT BNOINJ ' ovLDTc vHESTNur eRvwN CORGFLADO STONE SILL METAL GATE COLOR TO HUTCH LIGHT GRAY Y RIDOE MI�ATHER GArµuM1E V 5d- 4 COOw4ftCWLGRAT STONE VENEER SLIDE aOLT CORONA STONE. VIEJO { �' - AWHASP RANCH-VIEJOELEND _ F.FI. LINE OFF TTP. L. RIGHTSIDENEW S• STL CHANNEL ALL AROUND, PARTT COLOR TO MATCH BERMDGE WEATHER WAVAWME CHARCOAL @RAT Iq T.D.STEEL y T,O. STEEL § -L� r.O.WALL •------•--------- -. ---- T.O.WALL STEELA .W -ADO STONE SCL -E. BOARD, GRAY HARDIEa0AR0 } S } COLOR: CHEST" .. LANDSCAPE f - _ - —' Ste --AL • ..-.- _....�.. _ -- ••� �— LINE OF FT'G TYP. SHONE YErvEER .- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ccncFuov sTwlE -�rtJ¢ RANCH • v�J06LENO 8. REAR YIEW "ME MESH SCREEN STEELPOST.TYP. T.O.GTECL Y =7�; .... ._ _ 14 BATTEN 00AF04DIN¢-- ---- ---- --. --' --- - -- —. ' —.. _—I ..L� RARM BOARD --...... .. .. _ ... ... .. . . .. COLON, G STNIR BRDWN _ 1T7 Ma COROkFDO STONE SU. IIGRT GRAr Y Sig• b 1$y F• COROINADO5CONE•�nEJ¢ 1 RANCH- RANCH VIEJv BLEND METAL GATE COLOR TO MATCH aERRIOGE WEATHER WVAIUME C#4RCOAL GRAY A ., I- . U. ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) DIM T ORO" Ir Sr.- CII.4MEL ALL MOUND. PAINTCOLORTO MATCH OEARWOE HEATHER OAVALUME CRSRCGAL GRAY PRECAST CONC. CAP{ABOVEI. TYP r r.D.areEL r h T.O.WALL NEAW DM HRIGES WELDED, (3H PER GATE TTP. r • 14' 0". STL- STRAP WELD TO FRAME Y AND BACK OF DECK TYP. b x O•L GALV. FRAME DEI( DECK. TAL WEE WEIp TC O STt L' FRAME ALL AROIiNO TYP r x r A V4' STL GATE FRAME. ALL AROUND. MRER CORNERS, WELDED TYA. F.F.L. LEIS OF FTG TYP SLIDE BOLT AND HASP. TYP CANEBOLY.TTP. S• R r • 11• STL. TUBE O f IGGER. 1.4• 1p 5'W S 6• S 6' BILLET WELD BOTH ENDS TOM FRAAG I TYP. (4 FLAML L MRER AN WELD DGRHERs TN. --. •1 — _ - —117 STL TUBE - - - i p•xi'x 1r1•STL TY�PO9iS TYP. C ••- yI C1D�20.7 STL. CHMINEL AM Al PERU,1. Ha• FILLET WELD TO STEEL TM A •il IF BRA-. TYP. ME OF MAS. WALL BELOW TYP. r x E TACK iias to O M TUM FRAM D 'NE{/J TO STL. TIIpE FP.ARfG AND PRIM STL. WF I1 I' L'ALL AFOWIO TYP 4Wk17STL� ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE ROOF PLAN ROOF Aa-F ri N' II I PA • I I I lr STEEL. POST. TYR- WIRE MESH SCREEN A00'rE Z� S v Ir c+ ay a+ — —� — --- ------ --- ---------- 1 1- LINE OF FPG IBELOWI HOSE ----- --------- I I INN I B� � WW � BBIN�YOI I I `i5 --- ----- t i i A.C. PAwIW m� 14P aa' a' 1 aw• r RO. RO. RO. 75.8- wAE im- r� 1 2 I: III I I J, PWPC$EG STRIPING, SEE SITE PLAN x,u; vr= Ia 1 3 1 ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN SCME y4,=T4T 1 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE RETAIL AREA � 4- �4 I y ��w- 1 w�ww 74 BEDFORD CT. r� f I STATION FIGURE 7 - TRASH ENCLOSURES 21 BEDFORD COURT -R E MES- SCREEN STEEL POST_ TYP § I I it CATTEN BOARD SIDING ....... __........... .................... NAME BOARD COIAR pESTNIR BROWN J CORONADO STONE SILL. I LIGWGRAY b I flrl STONE VENEER ORONAD* RANCH - VI STONENOwEJG CANE BaLTTW. A. FRONT ELEVATION C12 .T STL. CHANNEL ALL AROUND PERIM. TNP.. PAINT COLOR TO MAYCH BERRIDGE WFATHER GAVALUME CHARCOAL (TRAY STEEL POST, TTP BATTEN BOARD SIDING HAROIE BOARD COLOR: CHESTNUT BROWN CO 130 STONE SILL,. LIGHT MAY STONE VENEER CORONADO STDw• viM HASP, RANCH-WEJ06LEN0 i§i .. — C. RIGHT ELEVATION ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GRIND SMOOTH ALLWELO$. SUBMIT $HOP DWIC FOR ALLm FABRN:ATILHS. SHOP PRRIE REO O/2LE, AM HELL PAWTALL ST WITH MIN. 121 COATS OF 9EMTGLOSS ENAMEL. COLOR TOMATCM MAHVF..TiwABER!'HM1E' Cs2x2G2 STL CMANHEL ALL AROu4D PERIM. TYP, PAINT COLOR TO MATCH IMRRIO WEATHER OAVALLAIE CtARCOAL GRAY NEAVY Dery HINGES WELDED. lit PER OATS TYP_ r x 1.4' CAD. SYL. STRAP. WELD TO FRAME AM SACK OF DECK TYR I-V2,'x 1&GA. WLV. STL ELED%, TACK WEIR TO STL. L• PRAME ALL AROUND TYP. SLIDE BOLT & KASP. TYP. r x r x VW STL GATE FRAME ALL AROUND, RIMER CORNERS. YIELDED TYP. COLOR TO MATCH HOMME wlATfCR OAVALUMF C ARODAL MAY LME OF IMS TYP C12 JSTL. CWWNEL AL PEMMO VP.. RAINY COLOR SEARAGE WEATHER LAVA CRiRC MAY STEELPOST.TYP BATTEN SOARD SIDING COLOR BOARD [pLORCHESTNUT BILpIN GY]RONADO STONE SILL. LIGHTOPAY >o STCNEYMNEER CORONADO STONE -YIEx RANCH - V IEJO BLEND METALGATE COLOR TO MATCH COAT ALL INT.A EKT. MAS, SURFACES BERRILGE YRATHBR GAVALUME WITH CLEAR PT7lTRATING SEALER. CHARCOALGRAY B. LEFT ELEVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 9'x 9'x Itf STL. TUBE WTRIOGER. 1w FILLET WELD BOTH ENDS TO STL. FR mC, TYR. 121 PLACES, MITER AND WELL CORNERS rrP rAY I,7 STT_ TARE PLSTS TTP C12Z.7 STL CWINNEL ALL AROVNQ PEN, 1.4-F1ULET WELD TO STEEL TUBE FRAIhoTYP LINE OF LUS. WALL BELOW TP t-IM x 18 GA OALV. STL. H' OEC%, TALK WELD TO STL TUBE FRAAfG ANTI PERIM STL I, Au AROMA TYP. GRIND SMOOTH ALL WE[➢S. SUBAII'T SHOP ONGS FOR ALL STL. FABRICATIONS SHOP PAWE RED OXIDE. AND FIELA PAINT ALL STEEL WTTH MIN. 121 COATS OF 500W CSS BRAAIEL. COLOR: TO MATCN MAHUF_TiMBER'NAME' I ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE ROOF PLAN SCALE up=ro 1 2 1 E TNK. CCML. SLAB. ] PSI MIN, WATEWCEM. RATIO 0.N. RE" WHH"AT Sal' O.C. EA. WAY AAA,, THICKEN AT ALL PERIM. WMS TYP, COLOR: ILLT. PRAY. 701 9'•7 9'-2' RNI LOT. BROOM. STL P0.4T STL PAST, TYP. METAL GATE . L � , • LINE OF METAL ROOF I Cp2TR1RlII ONTAINER CONTAINER I IH.LC,] . &' CA U BLOCK WALL § B E B I ! �I�,1M[■. ~_y` c r HIGN WHEN STOP IH.I i1 � 1 1 I I I i STL PL$T METAL GATE J!� KIS 11' -1'p 1 3 1 ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN 5�4.:•I• I 1 ;TRASH ENCLOSURE ---------------------------------------------- tI REIAiL AREk 4 w 4f BEDFORD Cr. ` C>a4S STATION i 1 FIGURE 7 - TRASH ENCLOSURES, CONT. 22 Bedford Court e. Mechanical Equipment & Vents • On -site mechanical equipment visible from buildings or public streets shall be screened. • Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes more than six inches from the outer building wall shall be screened from view by structural features that are compatible with the architecture or the subject buildings. Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes six inches or less from the outer building wall shall be designed to blend with the color and architectural design of the subject building. • Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by a decorative architectural structure or landscape screening that is compatible with the architecture and landscaping of the development site. Such screening devices shall be of a height equal to or greater than the height of the mechanical equipment being screened. • Roof flashing vents exposed to public view shall be painted or otherwise given a finish to match adjacent surfaces or concealed in a manner consistent with the building's appearance. 17.22.016 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS A. Landscape Elements The landscape design of PDO-16 shall conform to Section 17.08.060 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts, Landscape Standards) of the City's Municipal Code, unless otherwise specified below. Figure 8, Overall Landscape Plan, and Figure 9, Plant Palette, have been developed to provide the guidance for the landscape theme for PDO-16. Landscape plans shall be required as a part of any Development Plan or Conditional Use Permit for PDO-16 and shall include the following: A combination of ornamental plants and the use of drought -tolerant plant materials. Streetscape planted with a minimum 24" box specimen size street tree spaced at 30' on center spacing (maximum) with a combination of 5-gallon and 1-gallon shrubs and ground cover. Common landscaped with appropriate shrubs, trees and ground cover and maintained by a Master Property Owners Association for PDO-16. The following shall also be required as a part of any Development Plan or Conditional Use Permit for PDO-16: Sidewalks at building entries only shall be a minimum of 11' wide where adjacent to head in parking to allow for car bumper overhang. Additionally, a minimum landscape strip of 6' is required and shall be provided between a building and parking where there is no pedestrian space. One landscaped finger island shall be provided per every 10 spaces. Landscape islands shall be a minimum of 5 feet (inside dimension) in width to allow for tree growth and to avoid tree trunks from being hit. These shall also include a V-6" combination curb/step out. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 23 Bedford Court • Exceptions to this requirement shall be allowed underneath car wash vacuum canopies and adjacent to required ADA paths of travel. Trees and shrubs shall be placed a minimum of F away from water meter, gas meter, or sewer laterals; a minimum of 10' away from utility poles; and a minimum of 8' away from fire hydrants and fire department sprinkler and standpipe connections. Drip irrigation is required wherever possible. Overhead spray irrigation is not allowed within 24" of any non -permeable surface. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 24 BEDFORD COURT ,J:....... Owl .� . •�:� � ^� of � � - - "- 7 _ co ❑ - r. (—�IMrpF 42 [�0 1 ENHANCED PAVING �_---- �I PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK r - \ �J SCREENIN T iRANSF MER ENHANCED PAVING LOW MASONRY ENTRY ACCENT AT ENTRY _ WALLS WITH LOW FLOWERING WAIT/ G GROUND COVER PGNAGE S LANDSCAPE SCREENING SIG E DIRECTIONAL ti B E D F O R D CT . FROM INTERSTATE 15 FIRE � STREET TREES SHALL BE HYD MIN. 24" BOX AT 30' Q.C. • �.•qqH_ FIRE DCDA - LANDSCAPE _ SCREENING FROM _lam 11 1 f'� ADJACENT PROPERTY ED .y .��T .r.'�� - L�` BLD 1' y`y 1 BIKE RACKS v VINE SCREENING AT 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE, 1 I 1 SEE LEGEND ;- i BLD 2BIKE -I t ' ^ 1 �1 LOCKER K & 1 �• r SCREENED' 1 1 TRANSFORMER i I DRNE-THRU WINDOW FLAG POLE 1: 1 MENU BOARD VINE SCREENING A- k� VAC -ENCLOSURE, 5 LEGEND VINE NING AT TRASH cn SHRUB SCREENING AT CAR ENCLOSURE. SEE LEGEND TREE SPECIES WITHIN Z ' VACUUM MOTOR EASEMENT Q i) BIKE HALL BE APPROVEp �= BY EMWD f 1 c Z LOCKERS U ii ril: — yi� _ V]I ENU w(21 EXISTING TREES IN POOR HEALTH TO BE REMOVED BOARD r`r r j �IiG:i CF ';; JRK I - BUILT-UP EARTH BERMS IN SERIFS LANDSCAPE SCREENING AT DBL. OVERHEAD -- EXISTING SCR EEN':VA? L TO .+, EASING CMU itE51DENTIAL CLEARANCE BAR REMAIN RETAINING WALL ■ FIGURE 8 - OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 25 BEDFORD COURT symbol Botanical Name TREES Arbutus marina cercis occidentolis Chilopsis I. 'Bubba' Genera parviflora Common Name Strawberry Tree Western Redbud Desert Willow Australian Willow Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Maidenhair Tree Pinus canariensis Pistacia chinensis Prosopsis chilensis Podocarpus gracilior Woshingtonia filifera VINES ■ Lonicera japonica 'Hal Ilona' Canary Island Pine Chinese Pistache Chilean Mesquite Fern Pine WUCOLs Symbol Botanical Name REGION 4 SHRUBS/ I OUi DCOVERS Mod Low Low Low Low Low Mod Low Low California For Palm Low Hall's Honeysuckle Low SCRFEN SHRUBS Elaeagnus pungens Silverberry Low Leucophyllum frutescens * Texas Ranger Low Rhamnus californicca 'Eve Case, * ❑ arf Coffeberry Low Westringia 'Blue Gem' * Blue Gem Coast Rosemary Law * Identifies as selected from the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan - Approved Plant List AOhellla millefollum Boutelouo g. 'Blonde Ambition' Callistemon v. 'Little John' IStus purpureus Euphobla ri lda Festuaa mairi HeliOtotriton sempervirens Hepercaloe pariflora Lantana 'New Gold' Lovondula 'Me rlo' L uaaph llum f . ' ompaata' Ligustrum japonica 'Texanurn' Loni era j, `Halljona' Mactod enc unguis-catl Muhienbergia Oapilaris Myoporum parvifollium Myrtus or-r muni ' ompaota' Phormiurn tena Penni etum a. 'Bunny Tails, Penstemon h, VargariitCa BOP' Ro ernarinus o, 'Huntington Carpet' Solvia gre gii ene to rnandraliscae Common Name x.Vu of Common ` orrow Love Blue Grama Grass Love Little Jahn Sottiebrush Love Orchid Book Base Love ohper Plant Love Atlas Fescue Mod Blue Oast Grass Mod Red Yucca Low New Cold Lantana Low Meeria English Lovender Love Texas Ranger Low Texas Privet Mod Halm Honey Suckle Love Cat's Claw Low Pink Muhly Low Myoporum Low Dwarf Myrtle Mod Hybrid New Zealand Flax Mod Little Bunny Fountain Grass Love Foothill Pensetmon Love Prestrafe Rosemary Love Autumn Sage Low Blue Chalksticks Low LANDSCAPE NOTES PLANT MATERIAL NOT LISTED MAY BE USED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL ADHERE TO CITY DESIGN GUIDELINES, COPES AND REGULATIONS, ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. COMMON LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ALL TREES TO BE 1 Q' CLR. OF FIRE HYDRANTS, 8 CLR, OF WATER METERS AND 20' CLR, OF LIGHT STANDARDS Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) ALL SHRUBS TO HAVE A MINIMUM CONTAINER SIZE OF 5 GALLONS. FIGURE 9 - PLANT PALETTE 9.1 Bedford Court B. Project Entry and Edge Conditions The following text and figures describe the streetscapes contained in PDO-16. The streetscapes have been designed in a comprehensive manner to provide continuity within PDO-16 as well as compatibility with the existing, surrounding development. 1. Bedford Court Project Entry The Project entry is located on Bedford Court. The design of this entry is depicted on Figure 10, Bedford Court Project Entry. Utilizing the Plant Palette (Figure 9), both sides of the entry will include enhanced landscaping, which includes trees and shrubs. 2. Southern Edge/Existing Residential The southern edge of the Project site is depicted in Figure 11 a, South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Car Wash) and Figure 11 b, South Edge/Existing Residential Edge Condition (Coffee Shop). Utilizing the Plant Palette (Figure 9), this edge of the site will be planted with an array of trees, shrubs, dense and groundcovers, along with earth berms adjacent to the car wash for additional noise mitigation. C. Walls and Fences Walls provide edges, grade retention, spatial definition, and privacy. Walls and fences are particularly critical along the Project's southern edge, as it is the most sensitive edge. The following guidelines shall apply to PDO-16: • Landscaping should be used to soften walls. • Landscape materials will complement the architectural theme. • Stone veneer, masonry, block and wrought iron combinations are acceptable. • Wood fence material should be of the quality to stain so as to prevent rotting and weathering. • Walls may be covered with stucco in colors suitable to the architectural theme. • Stone surfaces may remain natural and unpainted. • Materials, colors and textures shall be varied to create interest and relieve visual monotony. • Barbed wire, wire, electrically charged fences, corrugated metal, chain link, and grape - stake fencing is prohibited. Reference Figure 12, Wall and Fence Plan. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 27 Bedford Court This page left intentionally blank for pagination purposes. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 28 BEDFORD COURT FIE DEST [AN ACCESS FROM PUBLIC SIDEWALK ARBUTUS MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE LOVE MASONRY ENTRY WALLS SEE ENLARGEMENT LOAN FLOWERING GROUND COVER ENTRANCE OFF BEDFORD CT. 0' EXI TINO 6' HIGH MU WALL AT 4.. Aft � �M— dAdOMM NEIGHBORING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY f L 4' - 5' EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUB * LIGUTRUM JAPONICUM • LEUCOPHYLLUM E. 'COMFACTA SECTION A, ENTRY - REFER TO FIGURE 8, LANDSCAPE PLAN MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK 0) 5 YEARS FIGURE 10 - BEDFORD COURT/ PROJECT ENTRY Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 29 BEDFORD COURT WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD x PROPOSED CAR WASH ENTRANCE o EUCALYPTUS SIDEROXYLON RED IRON DARK � 1 5 DENSE GROUND CC>VFP — ROSMARINUS • MYOPORUM ACCESS DRP,/E 12°-D° 01_811 BUFFER ZONE 36' GINKGO BILOBA MAJDENHAJR TREE BLD :--- SETBAC K —1 a1— SECTION B, CAR WASH ACCESS - REFER TO FIGURE 8, LANDSCAPE PLAN VEGETATION BUFFER @ 5 YEARS Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 6' - 8` SCREEN SHRUB • PITTOSPORUM • DODONEA VISCOSA DCISTING 6 CMU REIAENING WALL W! 4` WOOD FENCE ON TOP EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING 5' EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUB • LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM • ELAEAGNUS PUNGENS DRAINAGE SWALE BUILT-UP EARTH BERMS IN SERIES FIGURE 11A - SOUTH EDGE/EXISTING RESIDENTIAL EDGE CONDITION (CAR WASH) 30 BEDFORD COURT 4' - b' EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUB AT ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER • RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA • WESTRINGIA'BLUE GEM' EUCALYPTUS SIDEROXYLON RED IRON BARK _ WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 1 — GEIJEI A PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD MENU BOARD ACCESS DRIVE 8'-0" a a ,- -� ' L BUFFER ZONE 0' 301 GINKGO BILOBA MAJDENHAIR TREE 6' - S' SCREEN SHRUB • PITTOSPORUM • DODONEA VISCOSA EXISTING 6' CMU RETAINING WALL W14' WOOD FENCE ON TOP EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING - 4' - 6' EVERGREEN SCREEIN SHRUB • LIGUSTRUM JAPONICU ELAEAGNUS PUNGENS BLDG. DRAINAGE S ALE SETBACK -1G SECTION C, DRIVE-THRU COFFEE ACCESS - REFER TO FIGURE 8, LANDSCAPE PLAN VEGETATION BUFFER @ 5 YEARS FIGURE 11 B - SOUTH EDGE/EXISTING RESIDENTIAL EDGE CONDITION (COFFEE SHOP) Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) 31 BEDFORD COURT BFIDFORD ( W f 4 �f Planned Development Overlay (PDO-16) Proposed Entry Walls 3' CHISELED STONE CAP 'LIGHT GREY STONE: VENEER CORONA€]O STONE COLOR: VIEJO RANCH � Existing 6' CMU Wall with 4' Wood Fence (to remain) OUTRIGGER SUPPORTS AT WOOD FENCE AND CMU POSTS '±10' O.C. 4' HIGH WOOD FENCE AT POSTS, TYR 7 WALL STEP UP/ DOWN WrrH TOP OF WALL GRADE TOP OF FENCE ± 10' �. PAINTED CMU WALL COLOR: BEIGE FIGURE 12 - WALL AND FENCE PLAN 32 City of Temecula - PDO-16 0 100 200 Feet The map PDO16.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update i� and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis Updated 3/31/2025 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving the Statement of Investment Policy and Delegating Investment Authority to the City Treasurer PREPARED BY: Ward Komers, Assistant Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER BACKGROUND: The investment of funds by California cities, including the types of securities in which a city may invest, is governed by the California Government Code. Common themes in these laws focus on a sound investment policy, oversight of investment activities, safety in managing public funds, and reporting on transactions of the investment portfolio. Specifically, Government Code Section 53607 authorizes legislative bodies of local agencies to delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to sell or exchange purchased securities, for a one-year period. In addition to the guidance provided by state law, Chapter 3.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code sets forth the general fiscal provisions of the City, including delegating investment authority to the City Treasurer, requiring the purchase of investments to comply with state law, and monthly reporting of investment activity. The recommended policy reflects allowable investments and incorporates best practices as recommended by the California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA) and the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC). In general, the recommended policy accomplishes the following: Defines the City's investment objectives and guidelines, as well as their conformance with California laws; Delineates the State of California approved investment vehicles that are recommended as suitable for the City of Temecula; Outlines investment -reporting requirements; and Names the City's Investment Officer and delegates investing authority to the Investment Officer and her/his designees. The recommended resolution adopts the Statement of Investment Policy and delegates investment authority to the City Treasurer for Fiscal Year 2025-26. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact to the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Resolution Exhibit A - Statement of Investment Policy RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula at a duly noticed public meeting has received, reviewed, and adopts the City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy (the "Policy"), set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Any and all prior resolutions adopting an investment policy for the City of Temecula are hereby rescinded. Section 3. Pursuant to Resolution No. 13-38, the City Council has appointed the Finance Director as the City Treasurer. Section 4. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the City Council hereby delegates its investment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 to the City's duly appointed City Treasurer and designates the City Treasurer as the City's Investment Officer. Section 5. The City Council hereby delegates authority to the Investment Officer or her/his designee(s), including but not limited to the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the Assistant Director of Finance, to invest funds in accordance with the Policy. Section 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. Section 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall become effective immediately. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Exhibit A Statement of Investment Policy CITY OF TEM ECU LA CALIFORNIA Aft �PT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY Adopted May 27, 2025 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 POLICY...................................................................................................................................3 2.0 SCOPE....................................................................................................................................3 3.0 PRUDENCE.............................................................................................................................4 4.0 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................................4 5.0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY..................................................................................................4 6.0 ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.....................................................................................5 7.0 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS............................................................5 8.0 AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS...........................................................................6 9.0 REVIEW OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO.....................................................................................7 10.0 INVESTMENT POOLS / MUTUAL FUNDS..................................................................................7 11.0 COLLATERALIZATION..............................................................................................................8 12.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY OF SECURITIES...........................................................................8 13.0 DIVERSIFICATION...................................................................................................................8 14.0 MAXIMUM MATURITIES........................................................................................................8 15.0 INTERNAL CONTROLS.............................................................................................................8 16.0 PERFOMANCE STANDARDS....................................................................................................9 17.0 REPORTING............................................................................................................................9 18.0 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE AND ADOPTION...............................................................9 19.0 APPENDIX A - ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS.......................................................10 20.0 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS......................................................................................12 Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 2 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy 1.0 POLICY It is the policy ("Investment Policy" or the "Policy') of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (hereafter referred to collectively as the "City") to invest public funds in a manner which will provide the highest investment return, with the maximum security, while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City, and conforming to all State of California and City laws governing the investment of public funds. Therefore, in accordance with the State of California authority governing investments for municipal governments as set forth in the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq., and the powers and duties of the City Treasurer and other fiscal provisions as set forth in the Temecula Municipal Code, the City shall invest public funds in such a manner as to comply with state and local laws; ensure prudent money management; provide for daily cash flow requirements; and meet the objectives of this Policy, in priority order of safety, liquidity and return on investment. For the purposes of this Policy, "Investment Officers" shall be defined as the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Director of Finance/City Treasurer, Assistant Director of Finance, and/or any other official that has been delegated authority by the City Treasurer. 2.0 SCOPE This Policy applies to all investment activities and financial assets of the City. The funds covered by this Policy are accounted for and incorporated in the City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and include: • General Fund; • Special Revenue Funds; • Debt Service Funds; • Capital Projects Funds; • Internal Services Funds; • Agency Funds; and • Any new fund created by the City Council unless specifically exempted. Funds excluded from this Policy include: • Bond Proceeds. Proceeds of debt issuance shall be invested in accordance with the bond documents governing such funds as approved by the City Council or related governing board. • Deferred Compensation Plans. Investments related to the City's deferred compensation plans are not subject to this policy since third -party administrators manage them and the individual plan participant's direct investment and mutual fund selection. Deferred compensation plans must be approved by the City Council. • Section 115 Trusts. Investments related to the City's Section 115 trusts are not subject to this policy since third -party administrators manage them and direct the investments and mutual fund selection. Section 115 trusts must be approved by the City Council. All monies entrusted to the City Treasurer may be pooled in a diversified portfolio unless specifically exempted or excluded. Investments made on a pooled basis may include investments of the City and its Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 3 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy component units and agencies. Investment income will be allocated to the various funds based on their respective participation in accordance with general accepted accounting principles. 3.0 PRUDENCE Investments shall be made with judgment and care under circumstances then prevailing which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own financial affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by the designated representative shall be the "prudent investor" standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. Persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of local agencies investing public funds are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard which states: When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Investment Officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 4.0 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES The primary objectives, in priority order, of the City's investment activities shall be: Safety. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective, the City will diversify its investments by investing funds among a variety of securities with independent returns. Liquidity. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. Return on Investments. The City's investment portfolio shall have the objective of attaining a comparative performance measurement or an acceptable rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles. These measurements should be commensurate with the City's investment risk constraints identified in the Investment Policy and the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio. 5.0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY California Government Code Sections 53607 and 53608 authorize the legislative body of a local agency to invest, deposit, and provide for the safekeeping of the local agency's funds or to delegate those responsibilities to the treasurer of the local agency for a one-year period. The City of Temecula Municipal Code delegates to the City Treasurer the authority to invest and reinvest moneys of the City, to sell or Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 4 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy exchange securities, and to deposit them and provide for their safekeeping. The City Treasurer is responsible for daily management of the investment program, including: 1. Establishing procedures for operation consistent with the Investment Policy; 2. Approving daily investment transactions; 3. Developing projections of the City's cash requirements for operating needs; 4. Reviewing the liquidity position of the investment portfolio; 5. Ensuring that the City's cash position is consistent with operating requirements; 6. Preparing appropriate investment reports; 7. Developing, implementing, and monitoring controls over investments; and 8. Developing record keeping for investment transactions. The City Treasurer may delegate investment authority to qualified and competent officials and City employees such as the Investment Officers. 6.0 ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Investment Officers shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution and management of the Policy and the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial decisions. The Investment Officers must provide a public disclosure document by April 1st of each year or when material interest in financial institutions or personal investment positions require it. Furthermore, the Investment Officers must refrain from undertaking personal investment transactions with the same individual(s) employed by the financial institution with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City. 7.0 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS The City Treasurer (or Investment Officers) will maintain a list of approved financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to the City. These may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 150-1 (uniform net capital rule). Best practices include the following: 1. A determination that all approved broker/dealer firms, and individuals covering the public agency, are reputable and trustworthy; 2. The broker/dealer firms should have the ability to meet all their financial obligations in dealing with the City; 3. The firms, and individuals covering the City, should be knowledgeable and experienced in public agency investing and the investment products involved; 4. No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public depository as established by the established state laws; and 5. All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to conduct investment transactions with the public agency may supply the City Treasurer (or Investment Officers) with audited financial statements, proof of FINRA certification, trading resolution, proof of State of California registration, a completed broker/dealer questionnaire, certification of having read the City's investment policy and depository contracts. Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 5 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy An annual review of the financial condition and registrations of qualified bidders may be conducted by the City Treasurer (or Investment Officers) and a current audited financial statement requested for each financial institution and broker/dealer in which the City invests. 8.0 AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS From the governing body perspective, special care must be taken to ensure that the list of instruments includes only those allowed by law and those that local investment managers are trained and competent to handle. Therefore, in accordance with Government Code Sections 53601, 53601.6, 53601.8, 53635, 53635.2, 53638 and 53684, investments will only be made in authorized securities with a maturity date of five (5) years or less from the transaction settlement date. For the purpose of approved investments and compliance with the investment percentage limits compared to the overall portfolio balance, calculations shall be performed on the date the investment is purchased. If the percentage is legally compliant on the date of purchase, then compliance with the Law shall have been met. Calculations are to be based on the final maturity date, and neither duration nor average days may be used. The investment instruments listed in Appendix A are authorized for investment and any instrument not listed are specifically prohibited. Authorized investments are allowed under California State Government Code 53601 and 53635 and concentration limitations are equivalent to, or more conservative than, the code allows. 8.1 MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS If repurchase agreements are legal or authorized, a Master Repurchase Agreement must be signed with the bank or dealer. 8.2 LEGISLATIVE CHANGES Any State of California legislative action that further restricts allowable maturities, investment type or percentage allocations, will be incorporated into the City's Investment Policy and supersede any and all previous applicable language. 8.3 INTEREST EARNINGS All monies earned and collected from investments authorized in this policy shall be allocated monthly based on the cash balance in each fund as a percentage of the entire investment funds portfolio. 8.4 LIMITING MARKET VALUE EROSION The longer the maturity of securities, the greater their market price volatility. Therefore, it is the general policy of the City to limit the potential effects from erosion in market values by adhering to the following guidelines: • All immediate and anticipated liquidity requirements will be addressed prior to purchasing all investments; • Maturity dates for long-term investments will coincide with significant cash flow requirements where possible; and • All long-term securities will be purchased with the intent to hold all investments to maturity under then prevailing economic conditions. However, economic or market Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 6 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy conditions may change, making it in the City's best interest to sell or trade a security prior to maturity. 8.5 SECURITY SWAPS A security swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done to for a variety of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or to increase investment quality. A swap which improves the portfolio yield may be selected even if the transactions result in an accounting loss. Documentation for swaps will be included in the City's permanent investment file documents. 8.6 PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS Should an investment percentage -of -portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the City Treasurer will consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his or her decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. 8.7 CREDIT DOWNGRADING This Investment Policy sets forth minimum credit risk criteria for each type of security. This credit risk criteria applies to the initial purchase of a security; it does not automatically force the sale of a security if its credit risk ratings fall below policy limits. If a security is downgraded below the minimum credit risk criteria specified in this Investment Policy, then the City Treasurer shall evaluate the downgrade on a case -by -case basis in order to determine if the security should be held or sold. 9.0 REVIEW OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO The securities held by the City must be in compliance with Section 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments at the time of purchase. Because some securities may not comply with Section 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments subsequent to the date of purchase, the Investment Officers should at least annually review the portfolio to identify those securities that do not comply. The City Treasurer should establish procedures to report to the City Council/Board of Directors and to any oversight committee, should one exist, major and critical incidences of noncompliance identified through the review of the portfolio. 10.0 INVESTMENT POOLS / MUTUAL FUNDS A thorough investigation of the pool/fund is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis. Best efforts will be made to acquire the following information: 1. A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives; 2. A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated; 3. A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited; 4. A description of who may invest in the program, how often, what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed; Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 7 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy 5. A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings; 6. Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund; 7. A fee schedule, and when and how is it assessed; and 8. Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds? 11.0 COLLATERALIZATION Collateralization will be required on two types of investments: certificates of deposit and repurchase (and reverse repurchase) agreements. To anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, the collateral ization level will be 110% of market value for Certificate of Deposits and 102% for reverse repurchase agreements of principal and accrued interest. The City chooses to limit collateral to U.S. Treasuries. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party with whom the entity has a current custodial agreement. A clearly marked evidence of ownership (safekeeping receipt) must be supplied to the City and retained. The right of collateral substitution is granted. 12.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, will be held in safekeeping by a third -party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery -versus -payment (DVP) procedures (i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security after the security has been properly delivered). Securities will be held by a third -party custodian designated by an Investment Officer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. This section is intended to comply with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53608. 13.0 DIVERSIFICATION The City will diversify its investments by security type and institution. With the exception of U.S. Treasury securities and authorized pools, no more than 50% of the City's total investment funds portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. 14.0 MAXIMUM MATURITIES To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years from the date of purchase. With the express approval of the City Council, reserve funds may be invested in securities exceeding five (5) years if the maturity of such investments is made to coincide as nearly as practicable with the expected use of the funds. 15.0 INTERNAL CONTROLS The City Treasurer shall be responsible for ensuring that all investment transactions comply with the City's Investment Policy and for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft, fraud or misuse. The City Treasurer shall establish Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 8 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy written procedures for the operation of the City's investment program that are consistent with this Investment Policy. Internal controls deemed most important shall include: avoidance of collusion; separation of duties and administrative controls; separating transaction authority from accounting and record keeping; custodial safekeeping; clear delegation of authority; management approval and review of investment transactions; specific limitations regarding securities losses and remedial action; written confirmation of telephone transactions; documentation of investment transactions and strategies; and monitoring of results. Accordingly, the City Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor, which as part of its annual audit of the City, the City's external auditor will review compliance with statutes, policies, and procedures. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. 16.0 PERFOMANCE STANDARDS The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs. The City's investment strategy is passive. Given this strategy, the basis used by the City Treasurer to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be to identify a comparable benchmark to the portfolio investment duration (i.e., 90-day US Treasury Bill, 6-month US Treasury Bill, 2-year CMT- Constant Maturity Treasury). Benchmarks may change over time based on changes in market conditions or cash flow requirements. 17.0 REPORTING Pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated for a one-year period by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the delegation of authority is revoked or expires, and shall make a monthly report of those transactions to the legislative body. Subject to review, the legislative body may renew the delegation of authority pursuant to this section each year. 18.0 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE AND ADOPTION Pursuant California Government Code Section 53646(a)(2), the City's Investment Policy may be reviewed annually by the City Council and shall be adopted via resolution. Any modifications to the Investment Policy must be approved by the City Council. The City Treasurer shall establish written investment policy procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this policy. The procedures should include reference to: safekeeping, master repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts and collateral/depository agreements. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the City. Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 9 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy 19.0 APPENDIX A - Allowable Investment Instruments ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS PER STATE GOVERNMENT CODE (AS OF JANUARY 1, 2025)A APPLICABLE TO ALL LOCAL AGENCIESB MAXIMUM INVESTMENT MAXIMUM SPECIFIED % MINIMUM QUALITY GOVERNMENT CODE TYPE MATURITYC OF REQUIREMENTS SECTIONS PORTFOLIO° Local Agency Bonds 5 years None None 53601(a) U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None None 53601(b) State Obligations— CA And Others 5 years None None 53601(c) and 53601(d) CA Local Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(e) U.S Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(f) Bankers' Acceptances 180 days 40%E None 53601(g) 25% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Non -Pooled Fund SF 270 days agency's number rating by an 53601(h)(2)(c) monieSG NRSROH 40% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Non -Pooled Funds' 270 days agency's number rating by an 53601(h)(2)(c) moniesG NRSROH 40% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Pooled Funds' 270 days agency's number rating by an 53635(a)(1) moniesG NRSROH Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30%K None 53601(i) Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years None None 53630 et seq. Placement Service Deposits 5 years 50%L None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Placement Service Certificates of Deposit 5 years 50%L None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Repurchase Agreements 1 year None None 53601(j) Reverse Repurchase Agreements and 20% of the 92 days"' base value of None" 53601(j) Securities Lending Agreements the portfolio "A" rating category Medium Term Notes° 5 years or 30% or its equivalent or 53601(k) less better Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual N/A 20%P Multiple°-R 53601(1) and Funds 53601.6(b) Collateralized Bank Depositss 5 years None None 53630 et seq. and 53601(n) Mortgage Pass —Through and Asset -Backed 5 years or "AA" rating category SecuritiesT IessT 20% or its equivalent or 53601(o) better County Pooled Investment Funds N/A None None 27133 Joint Powers Authority Pool N/A None Multiples 53601(p) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None None 16429.1 Voluntary Investment Program Fund" N/A None None 16340 "AA" rating category Supranational Obligations`^' 5 years or 30% or its equivalent or 53601(q) less better Public Bank Obligations 5 Years None None 53601(r), 53635(c), and 57603 Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 10 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy TABLE OF NOTES A. Sources: Sections 16340, 16429.1, 27133, 53601, 53601.6, 53601.8, 53630 et seq., 53635, 53635.8, and 57603. B. Municipal Utilities Districts have the authority under the Public Utilities Code Section 12871 to invest in certain securities not addressed here. C. Section 53601 provides that the maximum term of any investment authorized under this section, unless otherwise stated, is five years. However, the legislative body may grant express authority to make investments either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body that exceeds this five-year remaining maturity limit. Such approval must be issued no less than three months prior to the purchase of any security exceeding the five-year maturity limit. D. Percentages apply to all portfolio investments regardless of source of funds. For instance, cash from a reverse repurchase agreement would be subject to the restrictions. E. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank. F. Includes agencies defined as a city, a district, or other local agency that do not pool money in deposits or investment with other local agencies, other than local agencies that have the same governing body. G. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. H. Issuing corporation must be organized and operating within the U.S., have assets in excess of $500 million, and debt other than commercial paper must be in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or higher by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or the issuing corporation must be organized within the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or LLC, has program wide credit enhancements, and has commercial paper that is rated "A- 1" or higher, or the equivalent, by a nationally recognized statistical rating agency. I. Includes agencies defined as a county, a city and county, or other local agency that pools money in deposits or investments with other local agencies, including local agencies that have the same governing body. Local agencies that pool exclusively with other local agencies that have the same governing body must adhere to the limits set forth in Section 53601(h)(2)(C). J. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in negotiable certificates of deposit that are authorized under Section 53601(i). K. Effective January 1, 2020, no more than 50 percent of the agency's money may be invested in deposits, including certificates of deposit, through a placement service as authorized under 53601.8 (excludes negotiable certificates of deposit authorized under Section 53601(i)). On January 1, 2026, the maximum percentage of the portfolio reverts back to 30 percent. Investments made pursuant to 53635.8 remain subject to a maximum of 30 percent of the portfolio. L. Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may exceed the 92-day term if the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity dates of the same security. M. Reverse repurchase agreements must be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state -chartered bank that has a significant relationship with the local agency. The local agency must have held the securities used for the agreements for at least 30 days. N. "Medium -term notes" are defined in Section 53601 as "all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States." 0. No more than 10 percent invested in any one mutual fund. This limitation does not apply to money market mutual funds. P. A mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized rating agencies or the fund must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Sections 53601 and 53635. Q. A money market mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations or retain an investment advisor registered with the SEC or exempt from registration and who has not less than five years' experience investing in money market instruments with assets under management in excess of $500 million. R. Investments in notes, bonds, or other obligations under Section 53601(n) require that collateral be placed into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, among other specific collateral requirements. S. A joint powers authority pool must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Section 53601, subdivisions (a) to (o). T. Local entities can deposit between $200 million and $10 billion into the Voluntary Investment Program Fund, upon approval by their governing bodies. Deposits in the fund will be invested in the Pooled Money Investment Account. U. Only those obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Inter -American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 11 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy 20.0 APPENDIX B - Glossary of Terms Accrued Interest: Interest earned but not yet received. Active Deposits: Funds which are immediately required for disbursement. Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) which include Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Association (Farmer Mac). Amortization: An accounting practice of gradually decreasing (increasing) an asset's book value by spreading its depreciation (accretion) over a period of time. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR): The official annual financial report for the City. It includes five combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Ask Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to sell securities. Bankers' Acceptance (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. Basis Point: One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (0.01). Benchmark: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments. Bid Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to purchase securities. Bond: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows, including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment. Book Value: The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder's balance sheet. Book value is acquisition cost less amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Certificate of Deposit: A deposit insured up to $250,000 (current amount) by the FDIC at a set rate for a specified period of time. Collateral: Securities, evidence of deposit, or pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposit of public moneys. Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT): An average yield of a specific Treasury maturity sector for a specific time frame. This is a market index for reference of past direction of interest rates for the given Treasury maturity range. Coupon: The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. Credit Analysis: A critical review and appraisal of the economic and financial conditions or of the ability to meet debt obligations. Current Yield: The interest paid on an investment expressed as a percentage of the current price of the security. Custody: A banking service that provides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collect and pay out income, to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. Delivery vs. Payment (DVP): Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities. Discount: The difference between the cost of a security and its value at maturity when quoted at lower than face value. Diversification: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns and risk profiles. Duration: The weighted average maturity of a bond's cash flow stream, where the present value of the cash flows serve as the weights; the future point in time at which on average, an investor has received exactly half of the original investment, in present value terms; a bond's zero -coupon equivalent; the fulcrum of a bond's present value cash flow time line. Fannie Mae: Trade name for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Federal Reserve System: The central bank of the U.S. which consists of a seven -member Board of Governors, 12 regional banks, and 5,700 commercial banks that are members. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): Insurance provided to customers of a subscribing bank which guarantees deposits to a set limit (currently $250,000) per account. Fed Wire: A wire transmission service established by the Federal Reserve Bank to facilitate the transfer of funds through debits and credits of funds between participants within the Fed system. Freddie Mac: Trade name for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Ginnie Mae: Trade name for the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), a direct obligation bearing the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Inactive Deposits: Funds not immediately needed for disbursement. Interest Rate: The annual yield earned on an investment, expressed as a percentage. Investment Agreements: An agreement with a financial institution to borrow public funds subject to certain negotiated terms and conditions concerning collateral, liquidity and interest rates. Liquidity: Refers to the ability to rapidly convert an investment into cash. Market Value: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. Medium Term Notes: Corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. New Issue: Term used when a security is originally "brought" to market. Perfected Delivery: Refers to an investment where the actual security or collateral is held by an independent third party representing the purchasing entity. Portfolio: Collection of securities held by an investor. Primary Dealer: A group of government securities dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and security positions held to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 12 of 13 City of Temecula Statement of Investment Policy Purchase Date: The date in which a security is purchased for settlement on that or a later date. Rate of Return: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the current income return. Repurchase Agreement (REPO): Atransaction where the seller (bank) agrees to buy back from the buyer (City) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Reverse Repurchase Agreement (REVERSE REPO): A transaction where the seller (City) agrees to buy back from the buyer (bank) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Risk: Degree of uncertainty of return on an asset. Safekeeping: see Custody. Sallie Mae: Trade name for the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Secondary Market: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. Settlement Date: The date on which a trade is cleared by delivery of securities against funds. Structured Notes: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative -based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. Supranationals: A supranational organization is formed by a group of countries through an international treaty with specific objectives such as promoting economic development. Supranational organizations also issue debt in the United States. The most commonly recognized supranational debt is the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank), International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Inter -American Development Bank (IADB). Treasury Bills: U.S. Treasury Bills which are short-term, direct obligations of the U.S. Government issued with original maturities of 13 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks; sold in minimum amounts of $10,000 in multiples of $5,000 above the minimum. Issued in book entry form only. T-bills are sold on a discount basis. Treasury Bonds: Long-term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. Treasury Notes: Medium -term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. U.S. Government Agencies: Instruments issued by various US Government Agencies most of which are secured only by the credit worthiness of the particular agency. Yield: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. It is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price of the security. Yield to Maturity: The rate of income return on an investment, minus any premium or plus any discount, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond, expressed as a percentage. Yield Curve: The yield on bonds, notes or bills of the same type and credit risk at a specific date for maturities up to thirty years. Adopted May 27, 2025 Page 13 of 13 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Michael Heslin, Director of Information Technology and Support Services DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Western A/V, Inc. for the Purchase and Installation of Audiovisual Equipment in City Facilities PREPARED BY: Damion Patrick, Assistant Director of ITSS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Western A/V, Inc. for audiovisual equipment within City facilities for an amount not to exceed $557,554.50; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, or $55,755. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula provides and supports audiovisual equipment in city facilities citywide. This project will upgrade or replace audiovisual equipment in three key locations: the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, Conference Center, and Fire Station 84. The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library will receive enhancements that benefit patrons by improving accessibility and technology, while also serving as a secondary emergency operations center. These upgrades include a video wall, video conferencing tools, and presentation equipment. The Conference Center will be equipped with video cameras to facilitate the recording and broadcasting of public meetings. Fire Station 84 will receive the necessary equipment to enable both in -person and remote training for fire department staff and the public. On February 27, 2025, the City issued a competitive solicitation for the purchase and installation of audiovisual equipment via the City's online bidding platform, PlanetBids. The solicitation did include the Local Vendor Preference Ordinance language as adopted in July 2012. There were three bidders for the project, none of whom were local vendors. Western A/V, Inc. was chosen as the preferred vendor and has previously contracted with the City for audiovisual services at many City facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program and Annual Operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND WESTERN A/V, INC. AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 27, 2025, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Western A/V, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on May 27, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2026, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for one (1) additional one (1) year term. In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2027. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Contractor agrees to procure, sell and install for the City audiovisual equipment as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment and or Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). 3. PURCHASE / INSTALLATION PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Contractor for the Equipment is Five Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Fifty -Four Dollars and Fifty Cents ($557,554.50). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Contractor in accordance with the following schedule as outlined in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. 4. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall sell and install the equipment as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A ("Work"). Contractor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed by the City. 5. PREVAILING WAGES 05/27/2025 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at /www.dir.ca Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 6. REGISTRA WITH THE DEPA ENT OF INDUSTRIAL ELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to 7. RANTIES OF VENDOR Contractor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. . Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Contractor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Contractor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Contractor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Contractor, enforceable against Contractor in accordance with their respective terms. b. . Contractor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement Documents. Contractor is aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as 05/27/2025 audiovisual automation and that City is relying on Contractor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c Full D sure. None of the representations and warranties made by Contractor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading 8. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Contractor shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 9. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Contractor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 10. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before December 31, 2025 11. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: Temecula City Hall 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 12. REJECTION In the event of such notice of non -conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "City Approval" City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Contractor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Contractor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 13. 05/27/2025 This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Contractor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to the Section entitled "Rejection" City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Contractor. 14. INDEMNI CATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 15. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: Exhibit A, Equipment Description and/or Scope of Work, Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, and Exhibit C, Proposal. b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. C. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Proposal (RFP) and/or the Contractor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Contractor's response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Contractor's response to the RFP. 16. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event the Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without 05/27/2025 further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 17. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. a. . Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. By executing this Agreement, Vendor is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b Deductibles and Self -Insured ns. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager c. Other Insura ce Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor's products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Vendor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition 05/27/2025 of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 5) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) If the Contractor's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the contractor. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Contractor, and all subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. d. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-: VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. . Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. f Soecial Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 18. SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND RRANATIES 6 05/27/2025 All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement. 19. LEGAL RES SIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 21. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractorfor performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 22. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 23. NOTICES 05/27/2025 Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Western A/V Steve M. Hollingsworth 1592 Batavia St. Suite 2, Orange, CA 92867 GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 25. AUTH TO EXECUTE THIS REEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 05/27/2025 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Western AN, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: ` Jay S he [in, CFO By: Catherine Schellin, President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Western A/V Steve M. Hollingsworth 1592 Batavia St, Suite 2, Orange, CA 92867 714 637-7272 _ 714 637-7330 steveh avl.com 05/27/2025 X TA DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT AND/OR SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall purchase and install ALL items described in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, and provide training, warranty, and subscription services for ALL items in Exhibit B. The work to be performed is the installation of the audiovisual systems within various City facilities throughout Temecula as described below. The Contractor shall remove existing audiovisual equipment, install new equipment and cabling, program control systems, configure and program digital signal processing systems, test and recalibrate the installed systems, and perform maintenance and support of the updated systems. General —Western AN, Inc. will install all components listed within Exhibit B. After completion of the project, as -built documentation will be delivered. This includes all drawings, electronic copies of all equipment manuals, DSP code, and uncompiled source code. Training sessions will be provided to all necessary personnel Homework Center Room (EOC): Display System: • Install 130" diagonal direct view LED (dvLED), 1.5mm pixel pitch, 1920 x 1080 (Full HD). • Install (2) 65" displays on each side of dvLED display. • All displays will be mounted so screen surface will be flush. Signal Distribution System: • All video (encoders & decoders) will be AVoIP (AV over IP). • Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. Multiview processor will allow four images (65" each) to be displayed on the dvLED • display. This will allow a total of EIGHT images to be displayed in the room. Web Conferencing System: • Two USB PTZ cameras will be mounted to capture the presenter or audience. These cameras will be controlled from the control system. Source selection between the cameras will be done within the conferencing application (Teams, Zoom, etc.). These cameras can be set up for presenter tracking. Audio System: WAVS will provide and install (6) Ceiling Microphones and (6) Ceiling Speakers. These microphones/speakers will provide exceptional coverage for all participants in the room. The ceiling microphones will be muted/unmuted from the touch screen as required. Additionally, these mics will only provide audio for web conferencing, NOT local speech reinforcement within the room. 10 05/27/2025 A 2-channel wireless system with (1) Handheld & (1) Bodypack/Lavalier will provide audio to the web conferencing PC and will also provide speech reinforcement in the room. A charging dock and rechargeable batteries are included for all transmitters. • USB audio with acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) will be provided from the DSP system directly to the Web Conferencing PC. Control System: • A 10" touchscreen will be wall mounted and will provide users with the following • control: • Source selection (Local and Overflow) • Multiview configuration • Display control (ON/OFF) • Audio control (volume UP/DOWN, microphone MUTE/UNMUTE • Camera Control (Pan/Tilt/Zoom and User presets) Miscellaneous: • A standalone rack with UPS will be installed at the rear of the room and will house all equipment. Conference Breakout Rooms Display System: Install a 65" display on a scissor mount for access to components. Signal Distribution System: Install a 4 x 1 HDMI switcher for sources and allow for future expansion Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. Web Conferencing System: • Install and connect a Neat web conferencing bar to the dedicated room PC. This provides a camera, microphone, and speakers for web conferencing. Audio System: • Audio from laptop and overflow will come from display. Sound bar is only for dedicated PC. Control System: • A keypad controller will be installed and will provide the following control: Source selection (Local and Overflow) • Display control (ON/OFF) • Volume UP/DOWN Miscellaneous: A 8-port ethernet switch will be provided to connect AV devices. Children's Area Breakout Room Display System: • Install a 65" display on a scissor mount for access to components. Signal Distribution System: Install a 4 x 1 HDMI switcher for sources and allow for future expansion Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. 05/27/2025 Web Conferencing System: • Install and connect a Neat web conferencing bar to the dedicated room PC. This provides a camera, microphone, and speakers for web conferencing. Audio System: • Audio from laptop and overflow will come from overhead ceiling speakers. Sound bar is only for dedicated PC. A 2-channel wireless system with (1) Handheld & (1) Bodypack/Headset mic will provide speech reinforcement in the room. A charging dock and rechargeable batteries are included for all transmitters. • New speakers and amplifier will be installed. Control System: • A wall -mounted 7" touchscreen will be installed and will provide the following control: Source selection (Local and Overflow) • Display control (ON/OFF) Volume UP/DOWN Microphone control Miscellaneous: An 8-port ethernet switch will be provided to connect AV devices. Existing rack will be reused. Heritage Large Conference Room Display System: • Install a 65" display on a scissor mount for access to components and bring display closer to finished edge of niche. Signal Distribution System: • Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. Web Conferencing System: • Install and connect a Neat web conferencing bar to the dedicated room PC. This provides a camera, microphone, and speakers for web conferencing. Audio System: • Audio from laptop and overflow will come from display. Sound bar is only for dedicated PC. Control System: • A keypad controller will be installed and will provide the following control: • Source selection (Local and Overflow) Display control (ON/OFF) Volume UP/DOWN Miscellaneous: A 8-port ethernet switch will be provided to connect AV devices. Public Area Displays Display System: Install a 55" display on a scissor mount for access to components Signal Distribution System: 12 05/27/2025 • Displays will have the ability to receive overflow signal from head -end system Normal operation would allow "Library Digital Signage PC" as default source. Display power will be controlled with internal Samsung scheduler. Audio System: • Audio from displays if required. Radio Area Miscellaneous: • Install (9) runs of user specified 50-ohm coaxial cable from network server room to 6-gang wallplate. Library Conference Room: Display System: • Remove existing screens and replace with new 87" x 139" tensioned projection screens. • Reuse existing projectors Signal Distribution System: • All video (encoders & decoders) will be AVoIP (AV over IP). Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. Web Conferencing System: • Four PTZ cameras (two per room) will be mounted to capture the presenter or audience. These cameras will be controlled from the control system. Source selection between the cameras will be done on the touchscreen. These cameras can be setup for presenter tracking. Audio System: • WAVS will provide and install (8) Ceiling Speakers per room with new amplifiers. • Existing DSP will be replaced with new DSP capable of AEC and providing USB audio to both web conferencing PC's Existing microphones and Assistive listening system will be repurposed. • A 1/0 plate will be installed at the front of each room for connection to the lectern. This plate will also have auxiliary audio outputs. Control System: • A new 10" touchscreen will be mounted on the lectern and will provide users with the following control: Source selection Projector and screen control (ON/OFF) • Audio control (volume UP/DOWN, microphone MUTE/UNMUTE • Camera Selection & Control (Pan/Tilt/Zoom and User presets) Miscellaneous: • Existing racks and lecterns will be repurposed. A local monitor (owner furnished) will be installed at each lectern for viewing dedicated PC. Conference Center Camera Add: Camera System: 13 05/27/2025 • Twelve Panasonic PTZ cameras (six per room) will be mounted per Temecula's direction. These cameras will provide 6G/12G video to the Blackmagic router. The output of the router will be connected to an 1/0 plate in each room. Operator assisted camera control will be accomplished using Panasonic PTZ controller. • NDI video from the cameras will be available to private LAN connection to Web conferencing PC's. A PTZ Virtual USB driver will allow camera selection on each PC. Camera control without an operator will be accomplished with the Crestron control system in each room (limited to specific cameras). • A DANTE to USB audio adapter will be installed in each room to allow microphone usage in web conference applications. • A network switch will provide the required NDI QoS and PoE++ power to all cameras. Fire Station 84 Renovation: Display System: • Install a 98" 4k display at the front of the room. Install a 65" displays on the side of the room. Signal Distribution System: Sources listed on WAVS bill of materials. • Matrix switcher will allow the same or different sources to each display. Web Conferencing System: • Two USB PTZ cameras will be mounted to capture the presenter or audience. These cameras will be controlled from the control system. Selection between the cameras will be done with the control system. Audio System: • WAVS will provide and install (2) Ceiling Microphones and (4) Ceiling Speakers. These microphones/speakers will provide exceptional coverage for all participants in the room. The ceiling microphones will be muted/unmuted from the touch screen as required. Additionally, these mics will only provide audio for web conferencing, NOT local speech reinforcement within the room. Control System: • A 7" touchscreen will be wall mounted and will provide users with the following control: Source selection to both displays • Display control (ON/OFF) • Audio control (volume UP/DOWN, microphone MUTE/UNMUTE • Camera selection & Control (Pan/Tilt/Zoom and User presets) Miscellaneous: • The existing rack and lectern will be repurposed. 14 05/27/2025 X PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 05/27/2025 %4k. ulestern 7AUfl0 Visual & Seeuniy April 30, 2025 City of Temecula Jayme Fox 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE: RFP #IT 25-01 Conference Room Audiovisual Automation -Revised Jayme, Thank you for the opportunity to submit our Revised Bid Response for the above referenced project information provided. Statement of Compliance The Price includes all Engineering, Project Management, Installation, Programming, Equipment, Training and Post -Installation Support, inclusive of Addendum's Numbers 1 & 2 along with Requested Changes per our 4/22/25 Conference Call, for the following specified systems: • Homework Center Room • Conference Breakout Rooms — Typical of (5) • Children's Area Breakout Room • Heritage Large Conference Room • Public Area Displays — Typical of (4) • Radio Area • Library Community Rooms Technology Refresh (A/B) • Civic Center Conference Room Center Camera Installation • Fire Station 84 Renovation • Tariff Surcharge (10%) Price Western Audio Visual's Price to furnish and install the Audiovisual Systems is Five Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand Five Hundred Fifty -Four Dollars and Fifty Cents $557 554.50 inclusive of all Applicable Taxes and Freight Charges, as detailed in the attached Proposal. This pricing is inclusive of Prevailing Wage Rates for On -Site Technicians and a 5-Year Maintenance Plan. Proposed Terms 30% Deposit / 30% Upon Equipment Order / 30% Substantial Completion / 10% Job Completion %kWestern k,47AUffin Vimal & Security Warranty and Preventative Maintenance The AV Systems are warranted against all defects of materials and workmanship, as a system, as well as individual components, for period of Five (5) Years after date of acceptance, or first used (whichever comes first). If an individual manufacturer's warranty for their equipment for a longer period, the manufacturer's warranty will apply. Exclusion and Assumptions • All Electrical Requirements to be provided by others. Western Audio Visual & Security specializes in the design, sale, installation, and maintenance of audiovisual systems. Western Audio Visual and its Team have been providing turnkey audiovisual system solutions to the corporate, industrial, government and educational marketplace for 19 +years. Western Audio Visual is authorized to provide and install all components specified in this RFP and has the financial resources to complete this project. While this will not be the only project Western Audio Visual will be working on, we will commit a dedicated Team of Qualified Personnel to ensure the successful completion of the project, see attached Project Personnel (Resumes). All Personnel that will be involved on this project are Employees of Western Audio Visual, no sub -contractors will be used on any phase. DIR #: 1000008082 Duns #: 557439069 California Contractors License: 871609 exp. 1/31/26 Classification: C-7 Thank you for your time and consideration and please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need further information at (760) 438-1200. Sincerely. Steve M. Hollingsworth Western Audio Visual Client Cq of T—W westernRepre en Mtive Steve Halhngsworm Contact Jay —Fox Audio y.s,al a 0 .. 7604381200 Atlereap 30600Pauba Rd lill��l *' Olflce 760 436 1200 Clly, Stale, Zip Temecula, CA 92592 Email st-ehOwavI com Phone 9513086300 Date 4/302025 Mobile Email layme fox@iamecuiaca gov ALWiD Visual hiye5tment Summa Homework Canter Room (FOCI l 1 B992B00 - 167200 7 803250 _ 1600 S 45 8 109900 1 9 14/14850 1 146.14850 Conference Breakou l Roams i 2633000 - 82000 237563 - '� 2499500 i 63500 6 - 1103713 ! 55,185.6] C hddrene Area Breakout Room 1 ! 120B000 + , 31700 1j 108736 5 1000 1000 1 1579600 1 39900 5 3 2971936 Ik 29,71906 H-Inge Large Conference Room 1 1 522900 i 16300 3 47180 3 600 6 1092400 5 1.00 6 - S 16 B53 80 i 16,85380 Pub1c Area 0,Wlaye ] 6 939900 - 29400 I 84814 i 2400 it 727600 i 29900 6 3 1B14014 1 18:14014 Radio Area 1 1 837200 - ' 26200 i554B - 6 614200 29900 S - ! 17 B304B i 17,B00 dB Library Community Room(s) 1 ! 5518700 ID) 171600 ID 497901 5 aaa a 4523800 1 139900 S 1 10652701 1 1..701 Conference Center Camera Add { 3066000 - 32100 3 2710 a4 I 6 252%00 6 49900 ! - f 6048664 S' 60,48634 -r: itygRlW gerc.-y18.5 1 2792500 3 97000 4. 251965 5 1600 Bi 2416900 S 59900 1: S 5619965 ! 56,19965 Tanlf Surcharge l '! 3 i I F 26 511 10 5 - S T 26 511 10 6 26,511_10 7i Alrmnam Pncl ALT1 5 ALT2 - ALT3 S ALT4 ALT5 5 STA.YOARDRP EWALRAIE SSASS.08 7ear1 Y-2 Y.Ar] reu4 War! eery S54880015.0000 45tB877 554B800 3548]00 Wxuunr7. all Ph PROJECT TOTAL' $535,602,50 a llvn i 30°I Deposit 1 30% Upon Equipment Order i 301 Substantial Completion 1 10 % Job Completion Client Aulhonzed Signature Pnnted Name 8 Title n gaofea Wrar30Eays TM1esacs tax suSlecf fa cM1ange--n the event oIaan mcreese tM1e chantagreesbpayfM1e currentsaleslax rota This proposals na1fo De copred rep2duced ar Ionvar4 fo any MrB perryasrts ronrenn are Me property of Weslem Audi Vaual Billing inguir— W--Audi. Visual I 1592Nodh Batavia S[reet,5ui1e2,Orange,CA92967 I P71463T7272 � extern Audio Visual City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Homework Center Room E00 Typical of 1 -Proposal Includes 1 Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile 858 442 9623 Office 760 438 1200 Email steveh@wavl com Revision A 1 m sa g IAC 130 IiK 130" AII-Irr-One DvLED System 5 5 2s.605 DO 2 4 Samsung OM65C 65-Inch Commercial 4K UHD Display, 500 NIT B 94300 $ 3,77200 1 4 Peerless STS650 Universal Scissor Mount for 39-85"+ Displays - Black $ 241900 S 67600 a 4 Peerless ACC-UCM2 Universal Component Mount 4500 S 18000 1 5 Crestron DM-NVK-36D P?A NVX® 4K60 4 4 4 HDR Network AV EnCoder+Da der 1'100 5 5,9950 2 '1Crestron DM-NVX-E20-2G-B-T DMNVX®4K604:2:0 Network AVEncoder, Wall Plate, Black Textured S 63260 S 1,89600 SOURCES (3) Wall Mounted Laptop Connections (UDMI only) Dedicated Instructor /Web Conferencing PC (Owner Fumished) Library Digital Signage PC (Owner Fumished) (2) Cable 1V Tuners (Owner Fumished) (2) Airmedia (Rack) 3 2 Crestron AM-3000-WF AirMedia® Receiver 3000 win Wi Fig) Network Connectivity $ 57900 E 1,15600 4 2 Crestron AM-TX3-100 AirMedia® Series 3 Connect Adaptor $ 42200 5 84400 5 1 Crestron PW-2412WU Wall Mount Power Pack, 24 VDC, 1 25 A. 21 mm, Universal 5 4200 5 42 00 6 2 Crestron DMF-CI-8 DgftalMedia^ Card Chasss for DM-NVX-C & DMCF, 8 Slots S 1.15000 S 2.31600 7 11 Crestron DM-NVX-360C DM NVXO 41<604AA HDR Network AV Encoder/Decoder Card - 1,04300 E 11,47300 8 1 Crestron HD-WP-4K-401-C 4K MultFWindow Video Processor with HDBaseT®&HDMI®Outputs 5 372900 1i 3,72900 .0 2 Netgear GSM4248PX-10ONAS AV Line Managed Switch - 40 Ports - Manageable - 3 Layer Supported - Mmu 1r - S 2.32300 S 464600 69,20 W Ppw& Consumption - 960 W PoE Budget - Optical Fiber, Tw1st d oar - PoE Ports - 1 U High - Rack -mountable, Table Top - Lifetime Limited Warranty i Lumens VG774R1N 20x❑o1.:.9l �pom USB30]ual.-A AuleTracking, PTZ Camera, 3Vhiie 5 183700 5 2,69400 2 Lumens VC-AC03W Wall Mount Bracket, white 5 6100 S 12200 '1 2 C29 C2G54266 Superbooster® 1-Port USB over Cat6a Box to Box Extender Kit- USB 3 2 Gen (5Gbps) $ 48300 S 96600 r 1 Batimp T—FORTE AV6 V r Faea IfO DSP win 12 analog inputs, 8 analog nlgpu,% 8 ghannelsconfgWeble USB S 254800 S 2.5411 00 audio, 128 x 128 channels of AVB, AEC technology (all 12 inputs), 2 channel Vo1P, and standard FXO telephone interface 3 Biamp Parle TCM-X White Low profile Beamtracking ceiling microphone, white 5 1,27400 3 3,82200 '1 3 Biamp Parle TCM-XEX White Low profile expansion Beamtracking ceiling microphone, white 5. 81200 S 2.43600 : I Biamp Tes-CONNECT TC-5D 5-port expansion device with AVB to Dante Bridging $ 1,04400 3 1.04400 5 I Crestron AMP-X300 X-Series Amplifier, 300 W E 46400 5 464 00 g6 Crestron SAROS IC16T-W-T-EACH+ Saros®Integrator 65-2-Way In -Ceiling Speaker, White Textured, Single (must be E BB 00 $ 52800 ordered in multiples of 2) i 1 Crestron DM-NAX-AUD-10 DM NAX®Audio-over-IP Converter with Balanced/Unbalanceci Line -Level Audio Input S 42200 S 42200 and Output 8 1 Shure SLXD4D-G58 Dual -Channel Digital Wireless Receiver 3 59500 5 59500 9 1 Shure S1_XD2/B58-G58 Handheld Transmitter with BETA 58 Capsule S 22900 5 22900 10 1 Shure SLXD1-G58 Bodypack Transmitter Y 15900 S 15900 11 1 Shure UL4B/C-MTOG-A Directional Subminiature Lavalier, Black 3 20900 S' 20900 12 T Shure SBC203-US Dual Docking Station for SLX-D transmitters and S8903 battery S 101 DD 5' 101 00 13 2 Shure SB903 LRhium4on Battery for SLX-D 3 313 00 5 7600 1 C[asL'o+1 TBW-10i Y}S 10 1 in WAII MWJnI Tpucn Screen, Black 3m7otn $ 1.60600 } 1 a09.00 7 1 Crestron CP4N 4-Series-Control System s 1,62200 S 162200 1 Middle AllenW RCS-3,4 ?ic COI1IIgUreo AV Parx Seriae 27 R'J'f 95400 5 95400 1 Middle Atlantic FC-DC Thermostatic Fan Control _ 10800 5 105 00 1 Middle Atlantic UPS-S1000R 1 RU Select Series UPS Backup Power, 1000VA r 65800 5 65800 Cable & Connectors S 1,09400 Installation Hardware & Accessories S 71900 Ppllipmarrt Rack Hardware I Lacng Bars, Blanks, Ve :I=_ et^ . S 21900 City of Temecula e■yxtern RFP #IT 25-01 Representative Steve Hollingsvrorth �Audlo _ vat Mobile 6564421200 Y Office 760 438 1200 Homework CeP[er Roorn_L>=4SJ Email steveh@vvavl com Typical of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 Revision A Engineering & Drafting 3 3.80000 Control Programming i 11 200 00 Project Management 3 2.26700 Staging & Assembly S 1.50000 Installation & Testing 3 19 634 00 Closing, & Commissioning $ 5,10000 Travel $ - Sub -Contract G4 .A $ Integration Labor Sub -Total S --30 do 45,201 00 Extended Service Plan 1 S 1.09900 Total Equipment $ 69,926 00 Total Labor a 45,201 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal S 135,12900 Total Shipping S 1.87200 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items - Subtotal 3 137 001 00 Sales Tax a 75 % S 8,03250 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) OTY 1 $ 4 00 Electronic Waste Fee 15 - 34" (S5 00) OTY 0 $ - Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (S6 00) OTY 2 S 1200 Electronic Waste Fee Total $ 1600 T vtw Se vlca "inimvn S 1.09900 pone( If requriwdY S �Western Audio Yisal t Samsung 7MSSC Peerless STS650 Peerless ACC-UCM2 City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Conference Breakout Rooms �uieaI of 1 - Proposal Includes 5 35vrrGi Curilltlalo914K UHD Display,'S0p NIT Universal Scissor Mount for 39-85'•+Displays -Black Universal Component Mount Representative Steve Hollings—th Mobile 858 442 9623' Office 760 438 1200 Email steveh@wavl com Revision A 94300 B ara.un 21900 S 21900 4500 5 4500 1 NEA- NEATHARSE All-in-One:awlerencirlg Bar Includes Camma. Mlcnt.phpn-s and Speaker; No 5 130t 00 $ 130100 Appliance 1 t CTa�ron OM•NVX-'W DMNVX®4K604:44•IDRNeCmrk4VEncoder/Decoder(EOCEndpoint) 70 5 1,19900 1 Crestron HD-MD4Xl4KZ-E 4x14K60444 HDR AV Svntcher = 4640D $ 46400 3 1 RCI Custom HDMI Input Plate - 2700 $ 2700 SOURCES Dedicated PC (OFE) Laptop @ Table Video Distribution End -Point (EOC) Ciestton MPC3-302-B 3SBnec& Media Prespnlalon ConlroltV 302, Black = 72700 $ 727 DO 7 1 Netgear GS106PP-100NAS B-Port Unmanaged Ethernet Switch 1 3100 $ 131 00 Cable & Connectors S 120 00 Installation Hardware & Accessories $ 6000 Equipment Rack Hardware :I-acmg 5.s Blanks, Vents, etc 1 $ 3000 Engineering & Drafting $ 31700 Control Programming S a 000 Project Management S 56700 Staging & Assembly $ 25000 Installation & Testing $ 2,26700 Closing, & Commissioning S 70900 Travel $ Sub -Contract S - G&A 3 8900 Extended Service Plan S 12700 Total Equipment S 5,26600 Total Labor 5 4.99900 Equipment and Labor Subtotal 5 10,265 DO Total Shipping 3 16400 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items 3 Subtotal S 10.429 00 Sales Tax B 75% S 47513 Electronic Waste Fee P• - 14" ($4 00) CITY 0 S - Electronlc Waste Fee 15' - 34" ($5 00) QTY 0 3 Electronic Waste Fee 35' and Greater (S6 00) QTY 1 5 600 Electronic Waste Fee Total i 600 Tp41 Servxm ggreerm n! i 12700 Bond Id rsluaedl 9 � Western Audioftual Samsung ❑Adi5C Peerless STS650 Peerless ACC-UCM2 City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Chi Idren's Area 9rea kout Room -yprcal of 1-PraposaI Includes 1 65-inch Commercial 4K UHD Drplay. 500 rl: Universal Scissor Mount for 39-85"+ Displays - Black Universal Component Mount Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile B5B 442 9623' Office 7604381200 Email sleveh@wdvl com Revision A 343 00 S 94300 21900 S 21900 4500 $ 4500 1 1 NEAT NEATBARSE All -in -One Conf--mg Bar oohoncs n ,it Speaw No a i]070➢ _ 1,30100 Appliance 7 1 Crestron i1ra NvX-390 DM NI K60 4:4:4 HD R Network 4V E,40de rfD7 wde• IEOC Endpoint) $ + 19y 00 5 1.1990 2 1 Gres on HD-MD4X1-4KZ-E 4xl 4K60444 HDR AV Swttcher 5 46400 5 46400 3 1 RCI Custom HDMI Input Plate 5 2700 5 2700 4 1 Tascam BD-MP4K Protessional-Grade 4K UHD Blu-ray Player S 54900 3 54900 SOURCES Dedicated PC (OFE) Laptop @ Wall Plate Video Distribution End -Point (EOC) Blu-ray 1 1 Bamo Tes+-aFOA TE AVE VT Frved Lfo DSP 6A, 12 a111Pog•nou9 a enalp-3 ou)puN, 9 _ rinnals =nfgurable USH 5 2.548 00 S 2.548 00 audio, 128 x 128 channels of AVB, AEC technology (all 12 inputs), 2 channel VoIP, and standard FXO telephone interface 2 1 Crestron AMP-X300 X-Senes Amplifier, 300 W $ 46401) $ 46400 3 4 Crestron SARDS ICI6T-W-T-EACH+ Saros® Integrator 65' 2-Way In -Ceiling Speaker, White Textured, Single (must be S 8800 $ 35200 ordered in multiples of 2) 4 f Shure SLXD4D-G58 Dual -Channel Digital Wireless Receiver $ 59500 5 59500 S 1 Shure SLXD2/858-G58 Handheld Transmitter with BETA 58 Capsule $ 22900 S 22900 9 t Shure SLXD1-G58 Bodypack Transmitter $ 15900 5 15900 7 1 Shure DH5T/O-MTOG DURAPLEX HEADSET, TAN, OMNI, MI $ 28000 S 28000 6 1 Shure SBC203-US Dual Docking Station for SLX-D transmitters and SS903 battery S 101 00 $ 101 00 9 2 Shure SB903 Lithium -Ion Battery for SLX-D S 3800 i 7600 1 1 Crestron RM14 4•S9,I Cphuol 5pdedl 5• 57900 $ IIU0 2 1 Crestron TSW-770-W-S 7 in Wall Mount Touch Screen, White Smooth S 1.04300 S 1.04300 3 1 Crestron CEN-I0-COM-102 Wired Ethernet Module with 2 COM Ports $ 215 00 $ 215 00 A 1 Netgear GS108PP-10ONAS Netgear&port Gigabit Ethernet PoE+Unmanaged Switch(GS108PP)-8 Ports-2 $ 13100 $ 13100 1 1 Noddle Atlantic TED E71187I1`,1G In -Cabinet Rack _ 1 Middle Atlantic PD-915R Rackmount Power, 9 Outlet, 15A, Basic Surge Protection - 9 It Cord S 11600 $ 11600 Cable & Connectors S 25400 Insfallaa , wwpre'K Arce—es 3 12700 _quipmr n Rack Hand—, LaJng Barg. ' -ranks, Vets, etc / S 6400 Engineering & Drafting S 1,26700 Control Programming S 3,200 00 Project Management S 1.13400 Staging& Assembly S 50000 Installation & Testing$ 7,50900 Closing, & Commissioning $ 1.984 00 Travel $ - Sub -Contract S - G&A IS Integration Labor Sub -Total S 20200 15,79600 Extended Service Plan $ 39900 A City of Temecula ��� RFP #IT 25-01 Representative Steve Hallingsworlh Mobile B58 442 9623' AodinYspal Office 760 438 1200 Children's Area Breakout Room Email steveh@mvl con, Tyatcal of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 Revision A Total Equipment $ 12,080 00 Total Labor 5 15,796 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal 8 27.876 00 Total Shipping S 34700 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items S -. Subtotal 3 28.22300 Sales Tax B 75% $ 1.0873 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) QTY 1 $ 400 Electronic Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5 00) QTY 0 $ Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater ($6 00) QTY 1 $ 600 Electronic Waste Fee Total S 1000 Total Service Agreement S 39900 Bond t if �equu'cu) 'J � stern Audio Visual EomsunQ OM65C Peerless STS650 Peerless ACC-UCM2 City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Ht:rltlrae Ldr4e Gonteren_c_e_Rovm Typical of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 65 n-:orrmrrri 4K UHD Display, 500 NIT Universal Scissor Mount for 39-65"+ Displays - Black Universal Component Mount Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile 858 442 9623' Office 760 438 1200 Email steveli(Q-1 com Revision A 94300 5 9czno 21900 i 21900 4500 6 4500 - NEAT NEATBARSE All-ni Conferendg Bar mGwdas Camera Lllcmp}anoa and Speaker, No 5 t 301 00 5 1.301 00 Appliance i 1 Cri=.Srrvn HD-THr:-EkE.101 DMS rn&&nsals 4KED 1 1 4 Tranariac.-''or I•ID4117V IRS 232, and IR Signal Ertep6lan a :77 00 5 22700 over CATx Cable (LAPTOP @ Table) 1 I Crestron HD-RXC-4KZ-101 DM&Essenuals 41<60 4 4 4 Receiver for HDMIi RS-232, and IR Signal Extension over S 22700 S 22700 CATx Cable r Creston DM-NVX-360 DM NVX®4K60444 HDR Network AV Encoder/Decoder(EOC Endpoint) $ 1, 19900 S 1,19900 Room Sources: Dedicated PC (OFE) Laptop @ Table Video Distribution End -Point (EOC) T :resrypn MPC 3.902-g 3-Se,IrGa Medu AresantaVonTmrcllc13C2 Black S 72700 2 t Netgear GS106PP-100NAS 6-Port Unmanaged Ethernet Switch = 13100 S 13100 Cable & Connectors $ 12000 Installation Hardware & Accessories $ 6000 Equpms l Rack Hard— ILoc q Bars, Blanks,':=ms. In1 = 3000 Engineering & Drafting S 1.26700 Control Programming S 1.600 00 Project Management $ 1,13400 Staging& Assembly $ 50000 Installation & Testing $ 5.10000 ri—n,&Commssioning S 1,13400 Travel $ - Sub -Contract $ - 0$A 3 8900 Extended Service Plan t $ 16000 5,22900 ,Heritage Large Conference Room Totals Total Equipment S Total Labor S 10,624 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal S 16,053 00 Total Shipping S 16300 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items $ - Subtotal S 16,21600 Sales Tax 675% S 47160 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 OD) OTY 0 $ Electronic Waste Fee 15' - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 S Electronic Waste Fee 35' and Greater (S6 00) OTY 1 S 600 Electronic Waste Fee Total S 600 Total Service Agreement S 16000 Bond �,r re,4.= S - Ap,do"i western 'kiVAudieAsoal Samsung QM59C Peerless ST650 City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 PUYIIc BreaRrea �1s�7lays �I of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 55-inch Commercial 4K UHD DISO:" - ,, N: SmartMounl Universal Tilt Wall Mount for 39" to 75" Displays- Black Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile 8554429627 Office 7604381200 Email sleveh@vvav1 com Revision A A300 5 4.17200 8400 S 33600 1 4 ;,"ron [YM,NVX-35U DM NVX841<60444 aDR 46,01 AV Encoder/Decoder(EOC Endpoint) 119900 $ 4,79600 Cable & Connectors $ 3200 bn Ja4snon Hardw�l0 & ACCa 90lea 5 6300 Epul"nl Rack Hardware (Lacing Bars, Blan':9, VEMs. eic 1 5 Engineering & Drafting 5 63400 Control Programming S Project Management $ 56700 Staging & Assembly S 25000 Installation & Testing $ 4,53400 Closing, & Commissioning $ 1, 13400 Travel $ Sub -Contract $ - G&A S 15700 Extended Service Plan 1 5 29900 Total Equipment 3 9.39900 Total Labor 3 7,276 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal 3 1 6,67500 Total Shipping i 29400 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items $ - Subtotal 3 16,96900 Sales Tax 8 75% 3 B48 14 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) OTY 0 3 Electronic Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 3 Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (SS 00) QTY 4 i 2400 Electronic Waste Fee Total 3 2400 Total Service Agreement 3 29900 Bond V I 3 - astern Audio Ysmsl 2 Liberty RG8-CMP-BLK City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Radio Area cal of 1 - Pr000sal Includes 1 -late 6-Gang, 9 BNC's, black 1000' Black Microwave and Wireless RF400 RG8 Sotid Dual Shield Plenum Cable Reel $ Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile 858 442 9623' Office 76043E 1200 Email steveh@wavl com Revision 4/30/2025 203.Oq 5 20300 4,00600 $ 8,01200 Cable & Connectors $ 15700 Installation Hardware & Accessones S Equiamchl Rack Hardware; Lacing Bars, Blanks, Vents, etc) 5 Engineering & Drafting 5 634 00 Control Programming S. - Pro)ectManagement S 56700 Staging & Assembly 5 Installation & Testing 5 6.23400 Closing, & Comn inning 5 56700 Travel 5 Sub -Contract 5 G&A 5 T4"R. Extended Service Plan 1 5 Lig 299 00 Total Equipment 3 5.37200 Total Labor 5 8,14200 Equipment and Labor Subtotal 3 16,514 00 Total Shipping 3 26200 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items 5 Subtotal $ 16.776 00 Sales Tax B 75% 5 75548 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) OTY 0 5. Electronic Waste Fee 15' - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 $: - Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (S6 00) OTY 0 5 Electronic Waste Fee Total 5 - Total Service Agreement 5 29900 eonA tR i2grlPed) 5 City of Temecula Western RFP #IT 25-01 Representative Steve Hollingsworth 858 42 Padia Visual Mobile 7604361200' Office 760 430 1200 Library Community Rogml3Sj Email steveh@wavl cam Tvuical of 1 - Proposal Includes t Revision A Christie DWU555-C:S E)aSTWG: WUXGA, 5,400 ANSI Lumen Lase- Phospnvr PrpleGlLr and Lens Christie 140-102104-01 EXISTING: Lens (1 52-2 89 1) 2 DaLite 21816L Da -Lice Tensioned Advantage Series, 87' x 139" with HD Progressive 10 - 21016L S 5.16000 S 10.320 00 1 4 Creslron OM-NV]c360 DMNVX®4K60444HDRNn,wDFHAVEnrodedCaccJ" 3 110900 $ 4,79600 2 P Crestron HD-MD4XlAKZ-E 4x14K6044:4 HDR AV Swttcher 5 46400 $ 92600 3 Z Crestron HO-DA2AKZ-E 12 HDMI® Distribution Amplifier w14K60 4 4 4 & HDR Support (Dedicated PC) 5 23300 $ 46600 SOURCES leer Room) Laptop Connection (HDMI only) Dedicated Instructor I Web Conferencing PC & Monitor (Owner Furnished) Blu-Ray Player (Existing) Apple TV (Existing) 1 2 3 4 4 1 2 Lumens Lumens Blackmagic Design AJA VC-TR40W VC-AC03W VHUBSMAS12G1010 U-TAP-SDI 20x Optical Zoom USE 3 0, Dual lens- AI Aul¢ i*ec<mp RTZ Cornea N+41r 'Wall %wnl 8r=el. w.nw Videohub 1000 12G Zero -Latency Video Router USB 3 0 (3 2 Gen 1) Powered SDI Capture Device 3 5 5 5 1,34700 5- 61 00 S 1,30700 $ 46300 5 5, 38B DQ 244 00 1.30700 92600 1 1 Biamp r—r.FORTE AV3 CI Faed I/O DSP wtth t2analog inputs 8nalcg a'_ aImda, 8 channels configurable USB $ 2.374.00 5 2.37400 audio, 126 x 128 channels ofrk'V5 and AEC technology (all 12 inputs) 2 1 Biamp TesiraCONNECT TC-5D 5-port expansion device with AVB to Dante Bridging 'S 1,04400 8 1,04400 3 2 Biamp Tesira EX-UBT PoE AVB/USB expander with Bluetooth® wireless technology '.i 52700 S 105400 4 2 Shure MX418/C Cardioid-18" Gooseneck Condenser Microphone, Attached Preamp with XLR, Shock S 21600 $ 43600 Mount, Flange Mount, Snap -Fit Foam Windscreen 5 2 Shure MXWAPT4=-Z10 4-CH ACCESS POINT TRANSCEIVER S 2.38800 S 4,77600 6 2 Shure MXWNCS4 4-CH NETWORKED CHARGING STATION 3 1.25000 $ 2,50000 7 2 Shure MXW2/SM58=-Z10 Handheld Transmitter with SM58®Microphone (includes one SB902 Battery) 3 49500 S 99000 8 2 Shure MXW1/O=-Z10 Bodypack Transmitter%nth Integrated Omnidirectional Microphone and 4-Pin Mini 50700 3 1,01400 Connector (TA4M) (Includes one SB901 Battery) 9 2 Shure WL185MB/C-TOG LAVALIER MICROPHONE, CARDIOID, BLACK $ 11300 S 22600 10 2 Shure DHST/O-MTOG DURAPLEX HEADSET, TAN, OMNI, MTOG $ 290 00 S 56000 11 2 Crestron AMP-X300 X-Series Amplifier, 300 W $ 464 00 a 9280 12 16 Crestron SAROS ICI6T-W-T-EACH, Saros@ Integrator 65' 2-Way In -Ceiling Speaker, White Textured, Single (must be $ as 00 3r 1,40800 ordered in multiples of 2) 2 Listen Technologies LS-54-072 Listen iDSP Prime Level II Stationary RF System (72 MHz) } 1 636 00 S 3,27200 1 2 Gfa9rlon TSW-T070413 1D 1 n INXII Mount Taursl Screen, Mae* $mbath 1 6IA3 DD 5 3212 DO 1 Crestron GLS-PART-CN Cresnel® Partition Sensor i 467 00 6 46700 res 3 1 Clron CP4N 4-SeriesTM Control System - 1,622 00 Fs 1,62200 4 1 Netgear GSM4230PX-t00NAS AV Line Managed SwRch - 24 Ports - Manageable - 3 Layer Supported - Modular 5 1.44400 i 1.44400 46 130 W Power Consumption - 4a0 W PoE Budget- Optical Fiber 1 = TBD TED E30STW Lewsrn 2 F Middle Atlantic TBD EXISTING: Rack in Lectern 3 1 Middle Atlantic TBD EXISTING: Wall Mounted Rack in Storage Room 4 7 RCI CUSTOM 110 Panel Custom Aux Audio Wall Panel 343 00 'n 68600 Cable & Connectors $ 1,24400 1fttnllaWn Hardware & Acce5sW169 5 93300 Equipment Rack H ardir&z;Lacing 3aa Blanks, Vents, etc) S 62200 Engineering & Drafting S 3.80000 Control Programming S 8.00000 Project Management $ 2.26700 Staging & Assembly $ 50000 Installation & Testing S 24,084 00 Closing, & Commissioning $ 5,66700 Travel S Sub -Contract S - G 3 •1 5 92000 Extended Service Plan 1 5 1,39900 Western A11�101�S��1 City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Ll6rary cgmtnunl[Y Roornl_s} oical of 1 -Proposal Includes 1 Representative Sieve Hollingsworth Mobile 858 442 9623 Office 760 438 1200 Email sleveh@wavl com Revision A Total Equipment S 55.18700 Total Labor S 45,236 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal S 100,42500 Total Shipping S 1,716 00 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large items S - Subtotal 5 102,141 00 Sales Tax 6 75 % S 4,97901 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) OTY 2 S 800 Electronic Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 S Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (S6 00) OTY 0 S Electronic Waste Fee Total S 600 Total Service Agreement S 1,39900 Bond lir required) 3 Western Audio usual City of Temecula RFP #IT 25-01 Conference Center Camera Add 'tvieaE of 1 • Propesai Includes 1 Representative Steve Holling-th Mobile 858 442 9623 Office 760 438 1200 Email stsveh@wav1 com Revision A 1 12 PTZ Optics PY7tW--014-WH-01 FfZOpecs.Move 4K-White 5 1,77900 $ 21.]gg JU 2 1 PTZ Optics PT-SUPERJOY-G1 IP and Serial PTZ Camera Joystick Controller S 73700 S 73700 3 12 PTZ Optics PT-WM-3-WH PTZ Camera Wall Mount Large $ 9400 S 1, 12800 J 1 Blackmagic Design VHUBSMAS12G2020 Vkleohub 20x20 12G Zero -Latency Video Router S 2,24300 S 224300 5 I RCI NA-250320PB-08 Custom 3-Gang Output Panel, 6-BNC's, black 5 10400 $ 20800 g 1 Netgear GSM4230UP-10ONAS AV Line Managed Svvdch - 24 Ports - Manageable - 3 Layer Supported - Modular - 4 $ 1.991 00 $ 1 991 00 SFP Slots - 48 80 W Power Consumption - 1440 W PoE Budget r 2 Audinate ADP-USB-AU-2X2 Dante AVID 2x2 USB Type -A IIO Adapter 5 16800 S 33600 3 2 AJA UTAP-SDI USB 3 0 SDI Capture Device 'a 463 00 S 92600 Notes: Proposal includes SDI Cross Connection from Conference Center to Master Control Room Cable & Connectors S 86700 Ixlallatnn Hah" die 8 Accessories 5 594 00 Equipment Rack Hardtvam ;Loring Sara 31an�s. As. etc 'a 28200 Engineering & Drafting $ 2,53400 Control Programming $ 3.20000 Project Management $ 1.70000 Staging & Assembly S 50000 Installation & Testing S 14,45000 Closing, & Commissioning $ 3,40000 Travel S Sub -Contract $ G&A $ 512m Extended Service Plan 1 S 49900 Total Equipment 5 30,66000 Total Labor 3 26.296 00 Equipment and Labor Subtotal 5 56,956 00 Total Shipping S 32100 Additional Shipping for Overnightor Large Items $ < Subtotal 5 57.277 00 Sales Tax 875% 3 2,71084 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" (S4 00) OTY 0 $ - Electronic Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 $ - Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (S6 00) OTY 0 S - Electronic Waste Fee Total S Total Service Agreement S 49900 Bond ld requltedl 5 Western Audio Vlslil OM98T-B 1 Chief XTM1U ' Samsunq OM65C Peerless STS650 2 Peerless ACC-UCM2 RFP #IT 25-01 Fire Station B4 F2enwation ical of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 931N GOMMrRCIAL 4K UHD LED LCD DIS-LAI WU Extra -Large Fusion® Micro -Adjustable Till Wall Mount 65-inch Commercial 4K UHD Display, 500 NIT Universal Scissor Mount for 39-55'+ Displays - Black Universal Component Mount Representative Steve Hollingsworth Mobile 858 442 9623 Office 76043a 1200 Email steveh@wavl com Revision A 8.36000 5 aiw�ou 27300 5 27300 94300 S 943 00 21900 $ 21900 4500 S 9000 t Crestron I-h'�-P.5L-22 8Q 4K6� ' 4 4 4 HDR Presentation System - '-5 ^ 3 ? 7S � x 1 Crestron HD-TXC-0KZ-101-lG-W DM® Essentials 4K60 4 4 4 Transmitter for HDMIS, RS 232, and IR Signal Extension 5 25600 S 25a 00 over CATX Cable, Wall Plate, While (LAPTOP) 2 Crestron HO-RXC-4KZ-101 DM® Essentials 4K60 4:4 4 Receiver for HDMI®, RS-232, and IR Signal Extension over 5 22700 S 45400 CATu Cable Room Sources Dedicated PC (OFE) Laptop @ Wall Laptop @ Lectern AirMedia (Rack) Crestron AM-3000-WF AirMedia® Receiver 3000 with Wi Fi® Network Connectivity Crestron AM-TX3-100 AirMedia® Series 3 Connect Adaptor Crestron PW-2412WU Wall Mount Pourer Pack, 24 VDC, 1 25 A. 21 mm. Universal 57900 S. 57900 42200 S 844 00 4200 E 4200 t 2 Lime- VC-': R401N 26R❑0rtal Zoom USB 30 Dual to lra AI Au[o Tracking, FTZDa Vil a il- S 1 347 00 S =.694 00 _ Lumens VC-AC03W Wall Mount Bracket, white S 6100 S 12200 3 1 Blackmagic design SWATEMSCN2/2ME1/4K ATEM 1 WE Constellation UHD 4K Live Production SwA her S 1,68200 $ 1 6a2 00 * 1 Bump Rivno MRB-L-X4004-12IGe CertiTied large room bundle, includes: 5 5,50000 $ 5 500 67 • Tesiral'ORTE X 400 • Parla TCM-XA White • Parle TCM-XEX White • (4) Desono C-IC6 White BPAK • 25, (7 5 M) Plenum Cat 5e Cable • (7) 10' (3 M) Plenum Cat 5e Cable 1 + =restron RMCA +-Serie4"' Control System S 5470 S 57900 2 • Crestron TSW-770-W-S 7 in Wall Mount Touch Screen, White Smooth 3 1,04300 $ 1,043 00 3 1 Netgear GS116PP-10ONAS 16-port Gigabit Ethernet PoE+ Unmanaged Switch 3 23300 $ 23300 1 1 Middle .3VarNc EiRS42-12 E�J&7J" Lectern Rau 2 1 Middle Allanhc PD-915R Rackmount Power, 9 Outlet, 15A, Basic Surge Protection - 9 1t Cord 3 11600 S 11600 Cable & Connectors S 6370 Installation Hardware & Accessories S 31900 &lbwinent Rack Hardware .L.LL.li1g Bars, Blanks, Vents, etc) S 16000 Engineering & Drafting S 2,53400 Control Programming S 4,80000 Project Management S 2,26700 Staging& Assembly S 50000 Installation & Testing S 10.767 00 Closing,& Commissioning $ 2,83400 Travel S - Sub -Contract $ - G 3 A 5 Integration Labor Sub -Total 46700 24,169 GO Extended Service Plan S 69900 W Western RFP #IT 25-01 Representative Steve Hollingsworth 9623 �AudioVisual Mobile 7604381200 Office 760 Fke 51aI in M Ren*Vobon Email steveh@vvav1 com ,.,.a, of 1 - Proposal Includes 1 Revision A Total Equipment - 2792600 Total Labor 5 24, 16900 Equipment and Labor Subtotal S 52,095 00 Total Shipping 5 87000 Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items - Subtotal 5 52,96500 Sales Tax 875% 5 2.51965 Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4 00) OTY 1 $ 400 Electronic Waste Fee 15' - 34" (S5 00) OTY 0 3 Electronic Waste Fee 35' and Greater ($6 00) OTY 2 5 1200 Electronic Waste Fee Total 5 16 00 Total Service Agreement - 69900 B�nu I T it qu,'evt - - City of Temecula �� RFP #IT 25-01 Representative Steve Hollingsworth Audio te �J Mobile 8564429623 Visual Office 7604381200 Tariff Surchar0e Email sleveh@vvavl com Typical of 1 - Pfopgwli Includes 1 Revision A 1 WAVS 10%Ta.IO Sir,01arge An ECu4Pmxn: arrd MMOfmis Pricing Listed Below Under Labor Section Cable & Connectors 5 - Installation Hardware & Accessories S - EGuipmenr Rack Hamnala'L =IHg Baia, 31gnlr V9nls TIC I 5 - Engineering & Drafting $ - Control Programming S Pro)ect Management S Staging& Assembly S Installation & Testing S Closing,& Commissioning $ - Travel S Sub -Contract $ InI, - n15e:icherge ll C-et $ ration Labor Sub -Total S 5 511 10 26,511 10 Extended Service Plan Total Equipment $ - Total Labor 5 25,511 10 Equipment and Labor Subtotal $ 26,511 10 Total Shipping $ Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items S Subtotal S 26,51110 Sales Tax 6 75% S - Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" IN 00) OTY 0 S - Electromc Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5 00) OTY 0 5 - Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater (S6 OD) OTY 0 $ - Electronic Waste Fee Total S - Total Service Agreement $ - 3ond PROPOSAL 05/27/2025 �,4(A�111-11111[11111 kiIF,I E:9.11; f -_ OUR COMPANY kf , PROFILE Years in the Industry 34 ■ vo- 018 Top Ranked Service Million $+ Projects Certifications #1 25+ 100+ Western Audio Visual & Security is a design -build audio visual and security firm specializing in the design, engineering, installation, and service of corporate, civic and education audio visual and security systems. While we are primarily a Southern California based company, our coverage extends north to the central California region and east to Nevada and Arizona. Our team is made up of highly recognized industry veterans with over 30 years of experience integrating solutions within executive boardrooms, conference rooms, auditoriums, training rooms, video conferencing suites, command/control centers and corporate headquarters throughout Southern California and beyond. Starting with AV budgeting exercises and following through to post installation support, the Western Audio Visual & Security team is well equipped to take any project from it's design stage to final installation. ORANGE/LA COUNTY Q1592 Batavia Street, Suite 2 Orange, CA, 92867 SAN DIEGO COUNTY Q12707 High Bluff Dr., Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92130 0 (714) 637-7272 O (760) 438-1200 e(714) 637-7330 (3 (760) 438-0066 ARIZONA 9 4636 E. Elwood, Suite 12, Phoenix, AZ, 85040 ® (602) 675-5575 AUDIO VISUAL l l SERVICES Western Audio Visual & Security is a full service systems integration company providing the design, engineering, installation and service of sophisticated audio visual and security systems. Providing turnkey AV and security solutions for: BOARDROOMS AND CONFERENCE ROOMS TRAINING ROOMS AND CLASSROOMS COMMAND AND CONTROL CENTERS AUDITORIUMS AND LECTURE HALLS VIDEO CONFERENCING SUITES COUNCIL CHAMBERS DIGITAL SIGNAGE HUDDLE SPACES BROADCAST SOLUTIONS Our staff of highly trained technicians ensures our clients receive the utmost quality & professionalism during the installation phase. With a focus on constantly improving, Western AV & Security technicians hold certifications with all major manufacturers. Leveraging years of experience with an unmatched attention to detail, our staff of dedicated technicians are well equipped to perform at a high level. Upon completion of each installation, a certified Western AV & Security trainer will host end user training sessions. These training sessions give clients the ability to use the AV systems in a comfortable, stress free environment. Once complete, our clients will have all the tools necessary to present, collaborate, and communicate using the most up to date audiovisual technology. The first step in any new project is identifying the functionality required while creating a realistic AV budget to work from. Western AV & Security's team of design specialists works with each client to define the needs of individual users and ultimately, configure what technology is needed to create collaborative, easy -to -use, future proof meeting spaces. Western AV & Security understands that up front planning and coordination throughout a project will ensure its ultimate success. A PMP certified project manager will be assigned to every new project. Our project managers oversee all aspects of the installation from communicating infrastructure with various trades (architects, general contractors, etc.) to scheduling the installation team and ensuring all systems are installed on time and within budget. SERVICE & CUSTOMER SUPPORT Western AV & Security understands the importance of limiting downtime related to any installation and our team of service professionals are available 24/7 to support our clients when the need arises. In addition to technical support, parts replacement and equipment repair, Western AV & Security's service team offers a variety of customized Preventative Maintenance Plans to safeguard your investment. CUSTOMER SUPPORT SERVICE HIGHLIGHTS: Direct phone numbers with all phones forwarded to individual cell phones for a better access to Western personnel. Complete Training Sessions tailored to specific end - users requirements. Organized and complete system documentation with every system. 24-Hour Technical Support with all Maintenance and Service Plans Standard and Customized Maintenance and Warranty Service Programs SOLUTIONS • Intrusion Protection Video Surveillance • Access Control • Monitoring Solutions • Alarm Verification • Integration Western AV & Security designs, installs, services and monitors seamlessly integrated electronic physical security solutions for a wide range of clients in southern California. Physical security equipment must provide the highest level of protection without fail for your assets. Western AV & Security partners with only the best equipment and software manufacturers to ensure what you want secured stays secure. Serving clients of all sizes, Western AV & Security will design a solution to meet both your current needs as well as provide the flexibility to support your future growth. Most importantly, Western AV & Security provides a wide array of professional services to ensure your investment is protected and continues to operate as originally designed. QUALIFICATIONS & CERTIFICHIONS Audio Visual Manufacturer Certifications Western Audio Visual & Security prides itself in the elite group of manufacturers we use in our projects. Our team of engineers and project managers are also certified in various divisions of these industry leading brands. Here are just some of those industry leaders we work directly with and are certified with... BARCo& biamp,:� CHIEF CHkIST/E CRESTWW- • . S HAR A`N �1 legrand SUASUNQ LISTEN( /X;%V— MIAdle Adanric Products NtMITSUBISHI ELECTRIC PLANAR 0,AOPREUMIER Panasonic vaddi0 ViewSonic OYAMAHA Security Certifications Western Security adheres to the highest standards set by industry leaders throughout the Security community. Our team of dedicated, expertly trained engineers, systems sales consultants, project managers, CAD designers, installers, and service technicians take part in industry leading and manufacturer training and certification programs, some of which are listed below... aviGiLon PELCO W � Rredet Ylalon OAIPNONE° K4NTECH DSC exacq n i q i e SAFRAN AXIS' COMMUNICATIONS /&!v NORTEK SECURITY& CONTROL Linear Suildniq Go Innvifphon. (Dbrivo " EAGLE EYE NLIS%ORKS INC Easy F LCdbby � VIKING �OnSSI secudgl i Communlafion SWUM" ,00* -.0mr- Western Audio Visual &Security PROJECT TEAM 9 KEY PERSONNEL 'Joe PROTECT TEAM: KEY PERSONNEL JAY SCHELLIN, General Manager Jay has over 38 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. In 1986, Jay started J.O.S. Projection Systems, Inc. which provided integrated system solutions to a diverse clientele. Some of these clients included: NASA, JPL, Intel, Hughes, Motorola, Northrop, Charles Schwab, as well as all branches of the military. With offices in Los Angeles, San Diego and Phoenix, J.O.S. primarily served the Southwestern U.S. In 1998, J.O.S. was acquired by the largest audiovisual company in the U.S. to transition them into the System Integration business. As part of the sale, Jay remained on board until 2001 as Vice -President of Systems Integration Group. In 2005, Jay started Western Audio Visual where several employees followed, due to Jay's loyalty and leadership skills. Upon building a reputable name in the AV industry with Western Audio Visual, Jay expanded the company by acquiring a security business as well, where Western Audio Visual & Security is now well-known among both industries. Jay is an alumni of Pepperdine University, where in his senior year, he was drafted by the Oakland Athletics. His career with the A's lasted three years at which time he began his career outside of baseball in the mainframe division of National Semiconductor. ERIK WILSON, Design Engineer, CTs-D,DMC-E,DMC-D,BEZBiampTesire Erik has over 30 years of experience in the audiovisual industry and is considered by many in the AV industry as one of the top engineers in the country. Erik started his career in the audiovisual industry with Ampro in Florida before moving to California and working with J.O.S. Projection Systems. He has also traveled all over the world for British Petroleum designing and fine-tuning Control Room Displays utilizing edge blending. He has performed many differentjobs in the audiovisual world including, Final Setup Technician for CRT projectors, Service Technician, Project Manager, System Designer, System Sales, Engineer and is now currently a Design Engineer at Western Audio Visual & Security. He has an AA degree in Electronics and many certifications including those from Biamp, Crestron, Christie, AMX, Panasonic and more. Erik also holds a CTS-D certification from AVIXA and DMC-E from Crestron Electronics. He has designed many high -profile projects including: Eastern Municipal Water District, City of Glendora, City of Anaheim, Fandango, City of Temecula, Viasat, Intuit, Too Faced, Children's Hospital of Orange County, City of San Marcos and City of Brea. He specializes in projects ranging from $750,000 to $2,000,000+. 0* �_Wwww_ 10JECT TEAM: LES STEVE HOLLINGSWORTH, Account Manager, amn Steve has over 30 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Steve started out with J.O.S. Projection Systems in 1994 and was part of the group that was acquired by MCSi in 1998. While there, he ran the most successful region in the company. He has worked as a System Designer, Salesperson, Project Manager and Regional Manager in the AV industry. His experience working on large, high -profile projects has impressed industry peers as well as clients. Due to his broad technical knowledge, Steve has the ability to solve complex integration challenges. The key phrase "Experience is Golden" certainly applies to him, and gives his clients the greatest benefit of all. Steve graduated with a Business Administration degree from San Diego State University and began his career with the San Diego Padres as a Project Manager in the Stadium Operations Department. Steve's client list includes, but is not limited to: Northrop Grumman, Viasat, Intuit, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, University of California Riverside and County of San Diego. 'ROJECT TEAM: L ENGINEERING PHIL ALDERSON, Direetar of Engineering, Md, CCNA, 13MC-0 DMC-T, 8£2, DtA-M, CTI- CSD, CTS, Biamp Tesira Phil has over 20 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Over his 20+ years of experience in the audiovisual industry, Phil has had many different job functions including Installation Supervisor, Project Manager, Field Engineer and Sales Engineer. Because of his significant experience, Phil continued to work his way up in the industry, where he is now the acting Director of Engineering at Western Audio Visual & Security. Phil is known around the office for his "can -do" attitude and his willingness to offer his expertise on especially challenging projects. Phil has multiple certifications including; Clearone, Lutron, AMX, Biamp, SVSi, QSC, Scala and Polycom. He has been a part of projects ranging from corporate, government, higher education, as well as performing arts. Some high -profile projects Phil has headed include: Taco Bell, Herbalife, New York Life, Too Faced Cosmetics and various colleges throughout southern California. KEVIN LAYMON, Engineer, DMC-D,Biamp Tesira Kevin has over 10 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Kevin started in the industry in 2014 working as an Installation Technician and was quickly promoted to Lead Technician. His attention to detail and communication skills led to yet another promotion as Project Closer. He now works as a Sales Engineer for Western Audio Visual & Security, a position he continues to excel at. Kevin is responsible for trouble shooting, testing and configuring the audio visual system for final sign -off by the customer and/or the consultant. Kevin is best known for his attention to the client, and has been known to drop what he is doing in order to help clients when they are in a pinch or in need of immediate troubleshooting or assistance. He is both Biamp and DMC-D certified. Kevin has worked on many high -profile projects including: Taco Bell corporate headquarters, Claremont McKenna College, City of Goleta, City of Ventura, City of Brea, City of Santa Barbara, New York Life, Intuit and Children's Hospital Los Angeles. RANDI ELLIS, EAD Engineer, CTS Randi has over 30 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Randi is well-known amongst the industry for her expertise, but is also known because she was the first female in the audiovisual industry to earn the CTS certification. She started in the industry in 1995 as a sales support specialist at Extron Electronics where she managed all GSA sales to the U.S. as well as sales and training to the Northeast region. Since 2002, she has worked for large integration companies as a CAD Engineer developing system design package standards. Before becoming CAD Engineer, she performed functions in systems integration such as Systems Integration Coordinator and Service Dept. Coordinator. Because Randi had knowledge in audiovisual systems before learning AutoCad, it gives her a unique advantage in being able to understand projects thoroughly. Because of this advantage, Randi can create drawing packages from as little as a list of equipment. 0000 PROTECT TEAM: ENGINEERING JAY P. SCHELLIN, Sales Engineer, DMC-0-4K, CTI-CTF, CTI-P30I, CTI-FUSION-P, CCI-CCT Jay has over 10 years in the audiovisual industry. Jay started his career in the AV industry as an installer, working his way up to become a field engineer and programmer. Jay has an AA degree in biological and physical sciences and mathematics and has experience programming for Crestron, AMX, Biamp, Q-SYS, Shure and more. Jay approaches every project with an upbeat attitude and has experience working on projects ranging from corporate, to military to city council chambers. While working at Western Audio Visual & Security, several customers have reached out to Jay's managers to compliment Jay's responsive and professional nature. Jay was also responsible for upgrading the NATO Response capabilities of Northrop Grumman, the Emergency Operation Center for the City of Orange Police Department, John Wayne Airport, and the City of Murrieta. Jay has also worked heavily on council chamber programming and commissioning including 35+ city and county chambers some of which are: County of San Bernardino, City of Ventura, City of Chula Vista, City of Temecula, City of Orange and more. EDGAR CARRILLO, Design Engineer, DMC-4K-E, BiampTesira,DSC,NVX-N,Extran Edgar has over eight years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Edgar started his career in the audiovisual industry as a technician at Western Audio Visual & Security and has performed multiple roles since his start. Edgar has experience in the roles of Project Superintendent, Service Technician, Closer, Field Engineer and, to his current position, as a Design Engineer. Edgar has a BS degree in Mechatronic Engineering and holds certifications with Crestron, Biamp, QSC-SYS, NVX and Extron. Edgar brings a hardworking persistence and attention to detail to every project he works on due to his experience working in multiple facets of the AV industry. Edgar has worked on many high -profile projects throughout his career with Western Audio Visual & Security, including several council chamber projects. Some projects to note include: Fandango, New York Life, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, City of Goleta, City of Temecula, Claremont McKenna College, and more. GEO CORONA, Programmer, CTS, CTI-P 20I, DMC-T, DMC-D, DMC-E Geo has 18 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Geo began is career in the audivisual industry while working 13 years in residential AV where he then transitioned into commercial AV. Prior to coming to Western Audio Visual & Security, Geo worked for two years as the lead installer and foreman for U.S. embassy projects. After working in installation for many years, Geo worked his way up into programming and technician work. Geo has multiple certifications including: a CTS, CTI-P 201 and smart graphics certifications, DMC-T, DMC-D, and DMC-E for digital media, and is an Extron Control Specialist. 00,01ROTECT TEAMw L PROTECT MANAGEMENT SHELBY TGAL, Senior Project Manager, PMP, oMc-o Shelby has over 25 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. He started his career at MCSi and has worked for a couple other large integration companies before arriving at Western Audio Visual & Security in 2010. He is Western's Senior Project Manager designated as the training coordinator for all new hires. Before joining the audiovisual industry, Shelby was a Sergeant in the Marine Corps for six years. His experience covers a full range of projects starting with simple systems and then, in the past 10 years, spent fully on large-scale projects. Some of these projects include: Herbalife - LA Live ($1.5 million), Taco Bell ($1 million), UCLA Medical Center, USC Medical Center, Mayo Hospital, City of Hope, UC Irvine, Claremont McKenna College and Intuit. GARRETT SMITH, Project Manager Garrett has over three years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Garrett started his career at Western Audio Visual & Security as an installation technician, while attending college at Concordia University, Irvine. After graduating from Concordia University with a Bachelor's degree in Communication, Garrett returned to Western Audio Visual & Security to work full time, and has worked his way up into a Project Manager position. Prior to Garrett arriving at Western Audio Visual & Security, he was a Corporal in the Marine Corps for four years. During his service, he provided logistics and operational planning for electrical systems. He has worked on many high - profile projects ranging from corporate to education including: Cal State Fullerton, AZTEC Engineering, EA Sports, Arizona Sports Foundation and more. PROTECT TEAM: SERVICE KEYIN MAHKORN,Service Manager, DMC-D Kevin has over 17 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Kevin started in the industry in 2007 working as a Project Coordinator. He worked directly with the project management and engineering teams on all new and existing projects. His attention to detail, knowledge of installation requirements in the field and coordination with end users made Kevin an integral part of the technical services department. In 2009, Kevin was promoted to Service Manager where he was tasked with building and maintaining a fully functioning service department - something he has done nothing but excel and exceed expectations with. Kevin has received great praise from clients and colleges due to his constant and outstanding customer service and support. He has a loyal following of customers and is recognized by many of our industry suppliers as the top in his field. Suppliers continue to steer their service business Kevin's way since it has had such a positive effect on their business. Kevin has worked on many high -profile projects such as: Taco Bell corporate headquarters, Herbalife LA Live, Metlife, WATG, Intuit, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Citrus College, Cerritos College and Bank of America. KEITH HOWARD, Senior Service Technician Programmer, CTS, DMC-D, DMC-E, DMC-T. BE2, DSC, Q-SYS Certified Keith has over 24 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Keith started in the audiovisual industry in 1999 as an Applications Engineer for Samsung Electronics. In 2008, he moved to Crestron Electronics where he worked as an Instructor for Certified Programming and DigitalMedia Certifications. He joined Western Audio Visual & Security in 2015 as a Senior Service Technician. Keith holds multiple certifications including certifications for Crestron Programming, Crestron DigitalMedia, QSC, Q-SYS and DSP Product Line. Keith's vast audiovisual knowledge and experience make him a valuable asset in the field for, not only our service department, but for our integration department as well. Having Keith on our team gives us an advantage because we have the flexibility to make programming changes immediately rather than having our client wait for a programmer to be available. RAY STEVENS, ?vice Technician, DMC-D, BE2 Ray has over 25 years of experience in the audiovisual industry. Ray started in the audiovisual industry in 1998 as an engineering assistant. He has performed many job functions over the past 18 years including Installation Technician, Service Coordinator, Inside Sales and Project Management. Ray holds certifications for Crestron Programming, Crestron DMC-D, Hilti and OSHA. Some of his clients include: Intuit, American Career College, Citrus College, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles and Irvine Ranch Water District. lD O Takk!Iwrr 1 � ON W Temgculp • =ouncl Appi vvat _ Temecula / Western AV- Onsite Kickoff Meeting 3 ® Equipment Procurment 4 Engineering Drawings 5 Control System GUI Creation 6 Control System GUI Review Control System GUI - ReviSlons R P47 Control System GUI Revision Review R 51 Ll brpry sffcofrdary EOC UT Homework Curter Room AN Cabling 12 ® Rack Fabrication 13 �® LED Video Wall Installation 14 ® A/VTerminations&Wiring Devices 15 —® WAV Equipment Set -Up & Updates jTi Onsde Programming If WAV Testing& Troubleshooting IA Substantial Completion 19 Training w/ City of Temecula Salf m '� Conference Breakout Rooms (Oty- 4( 21 ® Breakout Room#1 a Breakout Room #2 23 ® Breakout Room *3 34 z7 Breakout Room#4 .H Substandal Completion - Breakout Rooms 38 Training wl City or Temecula Staff - Breakout Rooms at Children, Area Breakout Room m Substantial Completion- Children, Area Breakout S9 � Training w/ City of Temecula Staff- Childrens Area breakout w 2-5 Heritage Large Conference Room 31 -7r] Substantial Completion- Heritage Large Conf Room Weslem AN - City of Temecula EOC - Preliminary Audio Visual Schedule - 3 21 24 Fe iTadgn 3t0n : iniai Am1 1 oWGen 412f4 Na. ;•aa yd Tn,lnw4 A1:p9rdp_s1i r1 f 5.19 0 wy. l day Wed 412424 Wed 4241241 Temecula l Weslem AV-onsite Kickoff Meeting ■ au i� 6�1 JuneLnll 1e:9 n36 71r 'trA _721 ]20 _ Y4 4 30 days Wed 511/24 Wed 611224, Ezu 1 -It 6/12 10 days Thu 42524 Wed 5/624• Engineering Drawings S/a 10 days Thu 519124 Wed 52224 Control system GUI Creation 519 — 522 1 day Thu 512324 Thu 5/231241 Contml System GUI Review � 5123 5 days Thu 5/2324 Thu 5130/24, conupl5yslem Sul -0.0.ion. W23 5/30 1 day Fri 5131124 Fri 5/31/241 Control System GUI Revision Review 5131 T Wkt rkm %44 Mori 61402. -u—r SesptaF..l U= _ SI6 a 3 Wks Mon Sd64d FHSM424 Homework Center R.,m 5 6 524 3 days Mon 51624 Wed 518241 AJV Cabling Ws = SA 7 days Mon 51624 Tue 5114/24, Rack Fabrication Sla 5114 5 days Wed 5I8/24 Tue 5114124 LED Video Wall Installation 5110 W14 5 days Wed 511524 Tue 52124 AN Terminmions & wlring Devloee, 5115 SRt 2 days Wed 5/2224 Thu 5/2324'i WAV Equ ipmMl SetLp B Updates SRZM mill 5 days Fri 5/24/24 Fri 5/31/241 Onn� ty P=r� 2 days Tue 514124 Wed 6/524 WAV Testing & Troubleshooting W{ 7 515 1 day Wed 6/524 Wed 31524; Subdts, I—pletlon 2 days? Thu 61624 Fri 617241 Trainingiw/ City of Temecula Staff 6/a = aR 6 days Wed 5122124 Mon 6131241 Confe—ifaa..9amds (oty: 4) WU R3 2 days Wed 5122124 Thu 523241 Breakout Room #1 5122 5 23 2 days Fri 5124124 Tue MUNI Breakout Room n 5124 � 2 days Wed 5129/24 Thu 5/30/241 Breakout Room US M9 = 5130 2 days Fri 5131/24 Mon 6/312411 Breakout Room#4 W31 sG l day Mon 6/324 Mon 6/3/241 sph,ier Compleldn- Braakeut Rowse ♦ 6/3 l day Tue 5/424 Tue 614241 Training wl City of Temecula St." -Breakout Room. art f♦ 614 2 days Wed 515124 Thu 6161241 children Ner Breakout Room "a R "Il day Thu 61624 Thu 6/61241 Substantial Complelon-Children, Area Breakout � 61a l day Fri 6/7124 Fri 61724• Training wl City &Temecula slain -Children -Area breakout all IA all 2 days Thu 616124 Fri 61724'1 Heritage Largeeonference Room alb = a/7 l day Fri 61724 Fri 67724 Substantial Completion- Heritage Large Conl, Room 1D � Tack umre 32 l T ammo 1W CJj� of temea)s 5 tO- H4nlagr .•a ": enl. � � Room PW+Io qrm a Ramp Alva 34 Library Community ROOms(A1B) �+ ® AN Cabling 36 r Rack Fabrication 3] Projecfion Screen Installation 3E AN Terminations & Wiring Devices 79 WAV Equipment Set -Up & Updates 'aA Onsite Programming 45 WAV Testing& Troubleshoofing 4 Substantial Completion 43 Training w/ City of Temecula Staff 44 CIVIC Center Conference Center 45 AN Cabling 46 ® Install Cameras 4] ® Broadcast Setup m WAV Testing & Troubleshooting -dq Substantial Completion 811 Training wl City of Temecula Staff 51 Fire Station 84 ]_ AN Cabling P Rack Fabrication Projection Screen Display Installation 55 qTj AN Terminate- & Wiring Devices 5 WAV Equpment Set -Up & Updates Onsite Programming % F7 WAV Testing& Troubleshoohng 54 Substantial Completion Training wl City of Temecula Staff si I ALL AREAS- Substantially Complete 62 I Audio Visual Closeouts & Documentation In Process Western AN - CM of Temecula EDC - Preliminary Audio casual Schedule -3 21 24 ]v>•.be atnl A.Irrkla April Yar tAV ei~-14 3131 4/7 4121 42B55 3114 319 5'3d 5: s!9 &4 6'30 ]I] 7'14 _ 721 _ 728 }4 1 day Fn 617/24 Fri 617124 TiaMlntl M City of TenieeulA shin-efar,4ge Ug-C Rdbm fill 1 62 3 days Mon 6110124 Wed 6112/241 Public Area & Radio Area silo il W12 10 days Mon 6110124 Fri 6121124' Library Community Rooms (AS) silo 621 2 days Mon 6/10/24 Tue BM 1124 AN cabling silo 1 Gill 5 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 611424 Rack Fabrication silo lWill 1114 2 days Wed GM2124 Thu 611 W24 Prolectifill Zcr N1] illation 4 days Thu 611324 Tue 6/18124, Ary Terminations & Wiring Devices 1113 1111 1 day Tue 611 B24 Tue 6/1 a/24 WAV Equipment SeWp & Updates 6118 � fi11B 3 days Wed 6119124 Fri 6/21/241 Dnsi. Programming W19 i 6121 1 day Mon 612424 Mon 6/24/241 WAV Testing a Troubleshooting 624 1 924 1 day Man 6124124 Man 6124/24 Subsramlal Completion fi24 l day Tue 6125124 Tue 6125/24 Trainingwl Cityof Temecula Staff Gas 1121 S days Mon 6124124 Fill61261241 Civic Cener Conference Center 1124 i 612a 2 days Mon 6/2424 Tue 625124 AN Cabling 5124 M 6125 l day Wed 6/26124 Wed 626124 Install Cameras W26 ■ 6R6 1 day Thu 512724 Thu 5/271241 Broad cast Setup 6127 61 1 day Thu 512724 Thu 6/27/241 WAV Testing & ou leshooting Tr W27 6137 1 day Thu $12724 Thu 5/27124 Substantial Completion -7 1 day Fri 0128124 Fri 612a/24' Training cal City of Temecula staff 'M S sra 7 days Mon 6124124 Tue T12124 Fire Station N W24 — 72 2 days Mon 612424 Tue 612524! A, Cabling 6124 M Gas 2 days Mon 6124/24 Tue 62524 Rack Fabrication W24 Is S2s 1 day Wed B26/24 Wed 6126124 Projection Screen f Display Installation W26 ! 6R6 2 days Wed 62624 Thu 527124 AN Terminations & Wlnng Devices W26 = 612T 1 day Fn 6/2B/24 Fn 6128/24' WAV Equipment Set41p & Updates = 6138 2 days Man 71124 Tue 712124, onsirel1. ...in. 1 day Wed 7/324 Wed 713241 WAV Testing & Troubleshooting ]I3 aT" 1 day Wed 7/324 Wed 7/3241 substantial T13Pletion l day Mon 7/824 Mon 718/24 Training cal City of Temecula Staff 72 y 718 l day Mon 718124 Mon 7181241 ALL AREAS- Subrontially Complete 7M 10 days Mon 71824 Fri 7119/24 Apd*Y Ud M keeula a Decums� -In pre—, 7A 7119 Weclem NV -City of Temecula ECC - Preliminary Audio Visual Sr —le - 3 21 24 1Pa>ic►Name puraraw �eR PI1nM {nN pyy ]uflr 7y�' 3(1 J/]_ _ 1-4121 _ 4I2B _ $IS __Y12__ 5119 Y26 N2 _ _6'9_ _ _ 6�16 623 6130 _ ]I] 7114 _ 221 _ 729 fl�4 4 AudU o sual Closeouts & Documenta9on Delivery 1 day Fri 7/19124 Fn 7119124 Audio Visual Closeoulc & Oocumemauon Delivery 7119 64 .f City of Temecula- Project Complete 100% Iday Fri 7/19124 Fri 7119124 City of Temecula- Project Complete ta9Y. * 7119 "Ustern AUMisual & Security Western Audio Visual & Security Technical Approach 1. Needs Assessment: - Conduct a thorough assessment of the client's requirements and preferences for the audio-visual system. - Identify the specific spaces that require audio-visual solutions and gather information on the desired functionalities and technical specifications. 2. System Design: - Develop a detailed system design based on the gathered requirements, considering factors such as room size, acoustics, and intended usage. - Select appropriate audio and visual components, ensuring compatibility and scalability for future upgrades. - Create a comprehensive wiring and connectivity plan to facilitate seamless integration. 3. Equipment Procurement: - Source and procure the necessary audio-visual equipment from reputable suppliers. - Verify compatibility and functionality of each component to meet the system design specifications. - Consider factors like warranties, support services, and future expansion options during procurement. 4. Installation Planning: - Develop a detailed installation plan, considering factors like cable routing, power requirements, and equipment placement. - Coordinate with other trades involved in the construction or renovation process to ensure a smooth installation. - Plan for contingencies and troubleshoot potential challenges that may arise during installation. rkestern Audio Visual & Security 5. Installation and Integration: - Execute the installation plan, ensuring precise placement and connection of audio- visual components. - Calibrate audio and video settings for optimal performance. - Test the entire system thoroughly to identify and resolve any issues. 6. User Training: - Provide comprehensive training sessions for end -users on how to operate and maintain the audio-visual system. - Create user-friendly documentation and tutorials to serve as a reference for ongoing system use. 7. Quality Assurance: - Conduct rigorous quality assurance tests to verify that the audio-visual system meets all specified requirements. - Address any issues or discrepancies identified during testing and ensure that the system operates reliably. 8. Documentation and Handover: - Compile detailed documentation, including system configurations, wiring diagrams, and user manuals. - Conduct a formal handover of the audio-visual system to the client, ensuring they are satisfied with the installation and have the necessary resources for ongoing support. 9. Post -Installation Support: - Offer post -installation support to address any issues that may arise after the handover. - Establish a maintenance schedule and provide contact information for technical support. 10. Feedback and Optimization: - Gather feedback from the client regarding their satisfaction with the installed audio- visual system. - Use feedback to identify areas for improvement and optimization, implementing any necessary adjustments to enhance system performance. Western Audio Visual & Security Proiect References Company Name: ViaSat Contact: Steve Hughes (760) 893-1548 Ste�c.�lu�hc5�cr �iasat.cam Dollar Value of Contract: $200,000.00 Contract Requirements: ViaSat has been using Western Audio Visual & Security to provide Audiovisual Systems for their Carlsbad Headquarters as well as various offices across the country for the past several years. The most recent project being their newly constructed Building 8, in Carlsbad, Ca. consisting of Biamp Audio Systems, Shure Microphone System with Cisco Telepresence and Epson Interactive Projectors. Company Name: Grifols Shared Services North America Contact: Noe Montoya (323) 227-7409 Noe.monto a rifols.com Dollar Value of Contract: $400,000.00 to Date Contract Requirements: Western Audio Visual & Security provides the Audio -Visual Systems for Grifols LA Headquarters as well as various Donor Centers throughout the US. Each location included multiple conference and training rooms, consisting of Display Systems (Flat Panel and Projection). Crestron DigitalMedia Signal Distribution and Control and PC Based Videoconferencing. Company Name: Northrop Grumman Contact: Aaron Brunette (858) 618-4028 Aaroii.bruflca : irngc.com Dollar Value of Contract: $1,000,000.00 + to Date Contract Requirements: Northrop Grumman Rancho Bernardo has been using Western Audio Visual and Security to provide Design Build Services for their Audio -Visual needs for their Rancho Bernardo Campus. Projects range from Conference Rooms, Video Conferencing Suites, and Conference Center. Northrop also utilizes Western AVS Service Department to maintain all AV Systems. Company Name: Skyworks, Inc. Contact: Dave Shah (949) 231-4316 Day c.sliAt (tskY k%orktiinc.cnm Dollar Value of Contract: $900,000.00 Contract Requirements: Skyworks contracted with Western Audio Visual & Security to design and provide their Audio Visual and Security Systems for their newly constructed building in Irvine. The project included various conference and training rooms, executive boardroom, and conference center. Company Name: Claremont Mckenna College Contact: Mitch Brown (909) 607-3055 Mitch. brown a,claremontmckenna.edu Dollar Value of Contract: $1,500,000.00 Contract Requirements: Since 2015 Claremont McKenna College has contracted with Western Audio Visual & Security to provide Audio Visual Systems for their various Audiovisual Projects, including their new Roberts Pavilion, various Classroom Buildings, Auditoriums, and their Athenaeum. The AV Systems have all included Crestron's DigitalMedia Signal Distribution and Control, Biamp DSP's, QSC Amplifiers and Speakers and Shure Microphone Systems. Western AV has continued to maintain and service all systems since 2015. Consultant for this project was WaveGuide for the Roberts Pavilion, all other projects have been Design Build by Western AV. Company Name: City of Temecula Contact: Damion Patrick (951) 694-6420 Dam ion. patricUcTtemeculaca.gov Dollar Value of Contract: $2,000,000.00 To Date Contract Requirements: Since 2009 Western Audio Visual & Security has been providing AV Systems for the City of Temecula, including, but not limited to the Council Chambers and Broadcast Studio, Traffic Management Video Wall System, Conference Center, Conference Rooms and Various AV Projects both at the Civic Center and Old Town. Along with providing the AV Systems, Western AVS also has maintained a Service & Maintenance Contract since 2009. -Raj rwum AV MIN W City of Buena Park Police Department Briefing Room Project Highlights: • 130" 1.5mm Samsung DirectView LED Display • Digital Signal Processor • Beam -Tracking Ceiling Microphones • Logitech Rally Web-Conferencing Cameras • Four 65" Displays ■ Cable TV Tuners Aueset rn dio Visual & Security • Crestron AirMedia Receivers for Wireless Presenting • Wall -Mounted Laptop Connection for Video Conferencing • 7" Touchscreen Control System Project Summary: The City of Buena Park Police Department awarded Western Audio Visual & Security (WAVS) the design -build project contract to upgrade their audio visual system. WAVS installed a 130" 1.5mm Samsung DirectView LED display and four 65" displays on the front wall of the training room/EOC. All presentation sources are encoded and decoded using video over IP technology. The following inputs can be shown on any and all of the displays in the training room/EOC: a wall -mounted laptop connection with video conferencing capabilities, two cable TV tuners, four Crestron AirMedia receivers for wireless presenting. A new digital signal processor to handle all audio routing, echo cancellation, and audio processing. WAVS installed two beam -tracking ceiling microphones. WAVS installed two Logitech rally web- conferencing cameras. WAVS installed and custom programmed a 7" touchscreen to provide ease of control over the entire AV system. City of Corona EOC Emergency Operations Center Project Highlights: • Three 2x2 55" Planar LCD Video Walls • Digital Signal Processor • Twelve Ceiling Speakers • Ceiling Mounted Beam -Forming Microphones !Westero Audio Visual & Security • Two PTZ Cameras rk�k'_ • 22" Touch Screen Control Desk Stand • Wall Mounted 10" Touch Panel • Ceiling Mounted Document Camera • Assisted Listening System Project Summary: Western Audio Visual & Security installed three 2x2 55" commercial -grade Planar LCD video walls with remote power supplies and an integrated mounting system. WAVS installed two PTZ cameras to facilitate all web-conferencing needs in the EOC. WAVS also installed twelve new ceiling speakers, two ceiling mounted beam -forming microphones, and one ceiling mounted document camera. WAVS also installed an Assisted Listening System to provide ADA compliance. The system is controlled by one 22" touch panel with a desk stand and one wall -mounted 10" touch panel. These touchscreens provide ease of control over the entire AV system. Control includes but is not limited to; powering displays on and off, adjusting volume levels, control of microphone mute/levels, and routing of AV sources. WAVS also provided a new DSP and amplifier to handle all audio routing, echo cancellation, and audio processing. The City of Corona purchased two years of the WAVS Service/Preventative Maintenance contract upfront. Eastern Municipal Water District IOC Integrated Operation Center Western Project Highlights: Audio Visual &Security • DirectView LED Video Wall • Samsung DirectView LED Display • 240 Watt Commercial Amplifier • Crestron Tabletop Control System • Two JBL Line Array Column Speakers • iPad Control System Project Summary: Western Audio Visual & Security was selected by Eastern Municipal Water District to handle the upgrade of their audio visual system in their new Integrated Operation Center. WAYS installed a DirectView LED video wall and a 1.5mm Samsung DirectView LED display. The following input sources (HDMI only) will be available to display on the DirectView LED video wall in the IOC: the Main SCADA PC, the Emergency Operations Center, two PC's in the IOC. WAVS installed one 2 x 240 watt commercial amplifier along with two JBL Line Array Column speakers on each side of the Direct View LED video wall. WAVS custom programmed an iPad to provide ease of control over the entire AV system. WAVS also provided a secondary point of control over the entire AV system via a Crestron 10.1" tabletop touchscreen. EMWD purchased one year of the WAVS Service/Preventative Maintenance contract upfront. City of La Mesa Emergency Operations Center & Conference Rooms t esrn e Project Highlights: AudioVisual &Security • 3x3 Video Wall with 45" Samsung LCD Panels • 75" to 85" Displays • Control System with 15.6" Touch Panel • USB HD PTZ Cameras • Digital Signal Processor for Audio Control • Phone Interface Project Summary: Western Audio Visual & Security was awarded the design -build project for the City of La Mesa Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and conference room project. Western AVS installed a 3 x 3 video wall comprised of nine (9) 45" Samsung LCD panels. Additionally, three (3) 75" displays and two (2) 85" displays were installed within the EOC. The video wall and additional five (5) displays in the room can display any of the twenty-five (25) different input sources specified for this room. A USB HD PTZ camera is connected to the desktop PC at the lectern to use during web-conferencing. This camera works with any web-conferencing platform (Zoom, Teams, Skype, WebEx, etc.). The entire system is controlled by a 15.6" Crestron touch panel. A new digital signal processor (DSP) was installed to control all volume functions and equalize the audio for best overall sound. A phone interface in the DSP will allow users to dial phone calls from the touch panel in the EOC and use the wireless microphones and room audio for EOC activation or for larger groups of users. Western AVS installed a 75" display in the conference room that can show up to five (5) different input sources, including an overflow feed from the EOC. The conference room is controlled by a 10" Crestron touch panel. The City of La Mesa purchased a five (5) year service and preventative maintenance contract with Western Audio Visual & Security. Eastern Municipal Water District Chamber Boardroom rkWestern Project Highlights: Audio Visual & Security itt— • Signal Distribution System • 27" Gooseneck Microphones • Upgraded DSP & Audio System • Custom Programmed Control System • HD PTZ Cameras • Streaming/Recording System Project Summary: Western Audio Visual & Security was awarded the design -build project for the Eastern Municipal Water District boardroom upgrade. As part of this upgrade, Western AVS upgraded the Signal Distribution System, Audio System, Control System, and Streaming/Recording System. Western AVS installed new 27" gooseneck microphones at the dais to drastically improve the audio quality for those speaking at the dais. An upgraded DSP system was installed to control these microphones while custom programming allows mix -minus in the system, increasing overall system performance. A 10.1" Crestron touch panel located at the Board Secretary's position, controls all room functions. Western AVS installed two HD Pan/Tilt/Zoom cameras that are used for recording and streaming. City of Manhattan Beach Council Chamber, Lobby and Broadcast Control Room Western Project Highlights: CAudia Visual&Security • Samsung 130" Direct View LED Video Wall • Digital Name Plates • Dais Touchscreen Monitors • HD PTZ Panasonic Cameras • Ross Carbonite Ultra 2 ME Broadcast • Ross Touch Drive TD2 Switcher Control Panel Switcher • Ross Xpression HD Character Generator Project Summary: The City of Manhattan Beach awarded Western Audio Visual & Security the design -build project to upgrade the audio visual system in the council chamber, lobby, and broadcast control room. WAVS installed a Samsung 130" Direct View LED wall, as well as two Samsung 98" displays to aid in presentation viewing. One Samsung 55" display was installed in the lobby for overflow purposes. WAYS also installed eight 22" touchscreen monitors at the dais integrated for council to view the presentation. WAVS installed fourteen 15" goose -neck microphones with touch capable mute switches at the dais and staff positions. At the dais, WAYS provided & installed eight decora style speakers to provide additional sound coverage for those sitting at the council positions. WAYS provided and installed six new HD PTZ Panasonic cameras as well as a new Ross Carbonite Ultra 2ME broadcast Switcher with Touch Drive TD2 control panel and Xpression HD character generator. The City of Manhattan Beach also purchased one year of the WAVS Service/Preventative Maintenance contract upfront. f , $677,000 Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with T.Y. Lin International for Highway Planting and Landscaping Design Consultant Services for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II Highway Planting, PW 16-01 PREPARED BY: Nino Abad, Senior Civil Engineer Shawna Bennetts, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the agreement for highway planting and landscaping design consultant services with T.Y. Lin International in an amount not to exceed $168,113 to provide continued construction support for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II Highway Planting, PW16-01; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $16,811, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: The I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project (Project) included the construction of a two-lane northbound collector/distributor system along Interstate 15 (I-15) from the Winchester Road/I-15 interchange northerly on -ramps to just north of the I-15/Interstate 215 (I-215) junction with connectors to I-15 and I-215. The original project included highway planting. However, according to Caltrans policy, highway planting with an estimated cost of $300,000 or more, in conjunction with or resulting from a roadway construction project, must be accomplished by separate contract and must include three years of plant establishment. Planting plans, separate from the original design plans, will be produced by the original designers from T.Y. Lin International, the Engineer of Record for the Project. FISCAL IMPACT: The I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget FY 2025-29. Project costs are supported by numerous sources of funds as shown in the attached CIP Project Budget sheet. There are sufficient funds available within the project budget to cover the total cost of this agreement, including contingency, in the amount of $184,924. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement 2. Project Description AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Y. Lin International FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/I-15 IMPROVEMENTS — PHASE II THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 27, 2025, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "City"), and T.Y. Lin International, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" ). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on May 27, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each fiscal year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Core Based Statistical Area using the most recently published month annual percentage change. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http:l/www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any 01/01/2025 subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 5. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html 6. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty -Eight Thousand One Hundred Thirteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($168,113) for the total term of this agreement . b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. 01/01/2025 b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. B. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant. 01 /01 /2025 10. INDEMNIFICATION a. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively "Indemnitees"), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub -consultants, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8. b. Other Indemnities. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than Two Million ($2,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Concessionaire has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to 01 /01 /2025 it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. By executing this Agreement, Vendor is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in aggregate. Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager. c. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant's products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 01 /01 /2025 5) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) If the Consultant's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Vendor, and all subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES 01 /01 /2025 The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 15. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: T.Y. Lin International Attn: Rodrigo Gonzalez 3633 East Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 700 Ontario, CA 91764 Phone: 909-912-6900 Email: Rodrigo.Gonzalez@TYLin.com 01/01/2025 16. ASSIGNMEN The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 17. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 18. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 19. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 21. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following 01/01/2025 non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 01 /01 /2025 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: By: RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: V "� James Bar , Vice President Kevin Cornish, Senior Vice President By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Consultant T.Y. Lin International Attn: Rodrigo Gonzalez 3633 East Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 700 Phone: 909-912-6900 E-Mail: Rodrigo.Gonzalez@TYLin.com 1n 01 /01 /2025 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: All tasks to be performed are per the proposal provided by the Contractor attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 01/01/2025 Scope of Work The TYLin team will provide Environmental Re -Validation and PS&E design services for the I-15/French Valley Parkway Phase II (I-15/FVP PH II)- Landscape Project (EA 43274-01). The design team will take the previously developed landscape plans from the early Phase II effort and update them as a standalone PS&E package. Per the I-15/FVP PH II - Landscape Project Scoping Meeting (2/6/25), the TYLin team was directed by Caltrans District 8 to re -initiate this PS&E package at 60% level design instead of the previous 90% design; this scope of work reflects this direction. All the deliverables will be prepared in accordance with the latest Caltrans and FHWA guidelines, policies, and procedures. Additionally, the tasks are consistent with the Caltrans Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) from the Caltrans Workplan Standards Guide (WSG). The TYLin team has prepared the following Scope of Services for this landscape project: Task 1 Project Management (WBS 100) Subtask 1.1 Project Administration and Meetings (WBS 100.15) TYLin will provide overall execution and financial management of the project, including City of Temecula and Caltrans coordination, coordination with other agencies, tracking progress of the work, preparing monthly invoices, project schedule development and maintenance, project status reports, and conducting project meetings. The Project Manager will provide management, coordination, and supervision of project staff to facilitate the performance of the work in accordance with the scope and requirements of the City of Temecula. The TYLin team will conduct meetings with the City of Temecula and/or Caltrans as requested to discuss progress, general project issues, obtain direction, and to exchange information. TYLin will also chair and conduct monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings (assume 14) and focused meetings as necessary (assume 14). TYLin will prepare monthly status reports to update the City on progress to date, work to be accomplished in the next period, and potential issues related to technical items or forecasted budget/schedule requirements. In addition, budgets, schedules, and project progress will be closely monitored and controlled through TYLin s internal project controls system. Deliverables: ■ Project schedule ■ Monthly project status reports ■ Monthly invoices ■ Meeting agendas and minutes 11Page Subtask 1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan (QA/QC) (WBS 100.15) TYLin will develop the project in accordance with its established QA/QC procedures and guidelines contained in the firms Surface Transportation Quality Management Plan. The project schedule will include separate QA/QC milestones, and each project submittal will include a compliance statement signed by the QA/QC Manager. The statement will also include confirmation that QA/QC has been performed on work submitted by the subconsultants. Note: Each task will include a separate QA/QC subtask. Deliverables: ■ QC/QA Plan and Statements with each deliverable Task 2 Landscape PS&E (WBS 230) The TYLin team will revise the previously developed landscape plans from the early Phase II effort and update them as a standalone PS&E package. The landscape PS&E package and will submit it to the City of Temecula and Caltrans for review and approval at 60%/ 95% 100%, and Ready -to -List (RTL) Ready levels of completion. The early Phase II effort was designed under 2018 Caltrans standard plans and the new package will be prepared in accordance with the latest Caltrans guidelines, including District 8's design oversight checklists and the 2024 Caltrans standard plans and specifications. Subtask 2.1 60% Landscape PS&E package (WBS 230.40) The 60% landscape PS&E package includes the following: • Title sheet (1 Sheet) • Landscape Plan (18 Sheets) o Planting Plan o Planting List o Planting Details o Planting Quantities • Irrigation Plan (18 Sheets) o Irrigation Plan o Irrigation Quantities • Specifications • Cost estimate Deliverable: ■ 60% landscape PS&E package (electronic submittal only) 2 1 P a g e Assumptions: • No more than 18 landscape plan sheets to be prepared • No more than 18 irrigation plan sheets to be prepared • One round of comments from Caltrans to be addressed during the 60% Phase Subtask 2.2 95% Landscape PS&E package (WBS 230.40) Based on the comments on the 60% landscape PS&E package, the TYLin team will prepare the 95% landscape PS&E package and submit it to the City of Temecula and Caltrans for review. Deliverables: ■ 95% landscape PS&E package (electronic submittal only) ■ Responses to 60% comments (electronic submittal only) Assumptions: • No more than two rounds of comments from Caltrans to be addressed during the 95% Phase Subtask 2.3 100% Landscape PS&E package (WBS 230.40) Based on the comments on the 95% landscape PS&E package, the TYLin team will prepare the 100% landscape PS&E package and submit it to the City of Temecula and Caltrans for review. Deliverables: ■ 100% landscape PS&E package (electronic submittal only) ■ Responses to 95% comments (electronic submittal only) Assumptions: • No more than one round of comments from Caltrans to be addressed during the 100% Phase Subtask 2.4 RTL Ready Landscape PS&E package (WBS 230.40) Based on the comments on the 100% landscape PS&E package, the TYLin team will prepare the RTL Ready landscape PS&E package and submit it to the City of Temecula and Caltrans for review and approval. Deliverables: ■ RTL Ready landscape PS&E package (electronic submittal only) ■ Responses to 100% comments (electronic submittal only) 3 1 P a g e Assumptions: Caltrans will approve the RTL Ready Landscape PS&E package after review Only one round of comments will be addressed at this phase. Additional rounds of comments requiring additional submittals of any PS&E packages will require an amendment. Task 3 Environmental Re -Validation (WBS 255.15) TYLin will prepare a brief National Environmental Policy Act/ California Environmental Quality Act (NEPA/CEQA) Re -Validation form based on the NEPA/CEQA Re - Validation form that is available on the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER) at the time that the analyses are performed. Existing available information from the I-15/FVP PH II Revalidation and information provided by the design team will be used to the following items. It will identify and document whether there are: • Changes in project design (e.g., substantial scope change; a new alternative; change in project alignment) • Changes in environmental setting (e.g., new development affecting traffic or air quality) • Changes in environmental circumstances (e.g., a new law or regulation; change in the status of a listed species) • Changes to environmental impacts of the project (e.g., a new type of impact, or a change in the magnitude of an existing impact) • Changes to avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures since the environmental document was approved. A brief discussion related to the validity of the information provided in the adopted environmental document for the project related to potentially impacted resources will be included. It is assumed that the resource areas covered will be biological, cultural, and hazardous materials/waste. It is further assumed that the only items that will need to be discussed is the installation of the landscape and irrigation within the existing disturbed areas of the I-15/FVP PH II Improvement Project, as addressed at the start of this scope of work. Based on the results of the above analyses, a determination will be provided on the NEPA/CEQA Re -Validation Form regarding the validity of the existing CEQA/NEPA documentation and findings. It is assumed that the finding will be that the CEQA/NEPA approvals are still valid in conjunction with the above listed analyses and that no further action is required related to environmental documentation. All discussions will be summarized in the NEPA/CEQA Re -Validation form and no additional technical analysis or documentation will be required. TYLin will also prepare an Environmental Study Request (ESR) form based on the ESR form that is available on the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference. 4 1 P a g e Deliverables: ■ NEPA/CEQA Re -Validation Form (electronic submittal only) ■ ESR Form (electronic submittal only) ■ ECR (electronic submittal only) Assumptions: • No additional technical analysis or technical memorandums will be required. • The landscape and irrigation work will remain within the existing disturbed areas of the I-15/FVP PH II Improvement Project footprint. • Based on the results of the above analyses, a determination will be provided on the NEPA/ CEQA Re -Validation Form regarding the validity of the existing CEQA/NEPA documentation and findings. It is assumed that the finding will be that the CEQA/NEPA approvals are still valid in conjunction with the above listed analyses and that no further action is required related to environmental documentation. • It is assumed that the existing Section 106/ Cultural Resource Documentation is valid and additional cultural resource documentation and analysis is not necessary for the Environmental Revalidation. • No assessments/evaluations for other resource areas are assumed to be included for discussion in the Re -Validation. It is assumed that no new environmental document will be required and that no changes related to environmental setting or environmental circumstances will be present or require discussion. • No Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment or Preliminary Site Investigations would be required for hazardous materials/wastes. • Two rounds of Caltrans comments will be addressed on the NEPA/ CEQA Re -Validation Form. • Two rounds of Caltrans comments will be addressed on the ESR Form. • Two rounds of Caltrans comments will be addressed on the ECR. General Project Assumptions: • The contract duration will be 14 months. • TYLin team will host/attend 14 PDT Meetings and up to 14 focus meetings. • Design files will be in Bentley's MicroStation V8i (SS10)/InRoads format. • All submittals will be Electronic, no hard copies will be provided. • No new utility potholing will be required; it is assumed the previous I-15/FVP PH II Improvement Project utility information is still valid. • No right of way acquisitions, including temporary construction easements (TCEs), will be required. • It is assumed that the Landscape Maintenance Agreement (LMA) or Cooperative Agreement will be coordinated, drafted, and executed between the City and Caltrans directly, therefore not included in this scope of work. 5 1 P a g e It is assumed that all previously approved I-15/FVP PHII Improvement Project reports, such as Supplemental Project Report (SPR) and Geometric Approved Drawings (GAD), are still valid and therefore not included in this scope of work. The agency that will Advertise, Award and Administer (AAA) the project is not known at this point. No Bidding or Construction Support is included. 6 1 P a g e EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Cost for services shall be as per Consultant's proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $168,113 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 01/01/2025 Date: Prime Consultant: Project Title: Client Reference: 05/01 /2025 TYLin 1-15/French Valley Parkway Interchange Phase II - Landscape City of Temecula T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL PROJECT TITLE BUDGET WORKSHEET Page 1 of 4 Contract No. XXXXXXX Yto Description Estimated Labor Hours Hours Raw Labor Amount U .^ ^ LL o a) L a U- a o a' C N c Uo c� a m c� co% LOof Y cn w O EO_> � w U) a) c 1E O L O o_ -0 C — cn w a- aOU � U> a)i o w cn 1.0 Project Management 1.1 Project Administration and Meetings (assume 14 months / 28 meetings) 28 14 42 $3,944 1.2 QA/QC Plan 4 8 12 $938 0 $0 TASK SUBTOTAL: 0 32 22 0 0 0 0 0 54 $4,883 2.0 Landscape PS&E 2.1 60% Landscape PS&E package 0 $0 Title sheet (1 Sheet) 0 $0 Landscape Plan (18 Sheets) 0 $0 Planting Plan 0 $0 Planting List 0 $0 Planting Details 0 $0 Planting Quantities 0 $0 Irrigation Plan (18 Sheets) 0 $0 Irrigation Plan 0 $0 Irrigation Quantities 0 $0 Specifications 0 $0 Cost Estimate 0 $0 QA/QC 2 20 22 $1,469 Respond to 60% PS&E Comments 0 $0 2.2 95% Landscape PS&E package 0 $0 QA/QC 2 16 18 $1, 219 Respond to 95% PS&E Comments 0 $0 2.3 100% Landscape PS&E package 0 $0 QA/QC 2 12 14 $969 Respond to 100% PS&E Comments 0 $0 2.4 RTL Ready Landscape PS&E package 0 $0 QA/QC 2 10 12 $844 0 $0 TASK SUBTOTAL: 0 8 58 0 0 0 0 0 66 $4,502 3.0 Environmental Revalidation Task Management/Meeting attendance 40 8 8 56 $4,337 Environmental Study Request (ESR) 6 10 15 31 $1,851 Environmental Re-evaluation 25 31 40 96 $6,020 Environmental Commitment Record (ECR) 6 10 15 31 $1,851 QA/QC 24 24 $2,631 TASK SUBTOTAL: 0 24 0 77 59 78 07�777 01 238 $16,690 1-15 FVP Phase 11 Landscape PSE—overall fee—SB.xls Printed: 05/09/2025 Date: Prime Consultant: Project Title: Client Reference: 05/01 /2025 TYLin I-15/French Valley Parkway Interchange Phase II - Landscape City of Temecula T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL PROJECT TITLE BUDGET WORKSHEET Page 2 of 4 Contract No. XXXXXXX Estimated Labor Hours o o ca c c cc N cc c� U a N O Q S= cn O E Q S= cn Yto 0 oL ma o 00 N o L O o_ OU � Raw Labor Description Li a c� a Y cn w EO_> w U) -0 C — cn w a- U i Ni o w cn Hours Amount Total Hours: 0 64 80 77 59 78 0 0 358 $26,076 Raw Labor Rate: $109.62 $62.50 $85.82 $71.63 $41.35 358 $26,075 Raw Labor Subtotal: $0.00 $7,015.68 $5,000.00 $6,608.14 $4,226.17 $3,225.30 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Escalation Rate: Price Amount Contract Duration (Years): 1.17 $0.67 $0 RAW LABOR: $26,076 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Quantity Unit Mileage EA $0 $0 152.49% OVERHEAD: $39,762 COSTS: $0 RAW LABOR + OVERHEAD: $65,838 OTHER DIRECT SUBCONSULTANT/VENDOR SERVICES Amount % DBE? Parsons Landscape Architects Subtotal - SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES: $95,691 56.9% $95,691 56.9% DBE Participation: $0 $0.0 10.0% FIXED FEE SUBCONSULTANT/VENDOR SERVICES $6, 584 $95,691 OTHER DIRECT COSTS: $0 BASE BUDGET: $168,113 1-15 FVP Phase 11 Landscape PSE—overall fee—SB.xls Printed: 05/09/2025 Date: Subconsultant: Project Title: Client Reference 05/01 /2025 Parsons 1-15/French Valley Parkway Interchange Phase II - Landscape City of Temecula T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL PROJECT TITLE BUDGET WORKSHEET Page 3 of 4 Contract No. XXXXXXX Y f fA N Description p Estimated Labor Hours Hours Raw Labor Amount L CU CJ (a c6 V .�? (6 Q O Q N� � ` a- N L M O V C °�' .a) .2) a) a °' ina_0 � L O CL a) co U Q L C °' M m �0 O Q cn p E Q OU $0 1.0 Project Management 1.1 Project Administration and Meetings (assume 14 months / 28 meetings) 0 1.2 QA/QC Plan 0 $0 0 $0 TASK SUBTOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 2.0 Landscape PS&E 2.1 60% Landscape PS&E package 0 $0 Title sheet (1 Sheet) 0 0 1 0 4 5 $205 Landscape Plan (18 Sheets) 0 2 4 8 2 16 $768 Planting Plan 0 2 8 15 4 29 $1,305 Planting List 0 2 0 4 1 7 $378 Planting Details 0 2 0 4 1 7 $378 Planting Quantities 0 2 4 4 1 11 $584 Irrigation Plan (18 Sheets) 0 2 8 4 2 16 $828 Irrigation Plan 0 2 20 4 4 30 $1,524 Irrigation Quantities 0 2 8 0 1 11 $645 Specifications 0 4 2 0 0 6 $491 Cost Estimate 0 4 2 0 0 6 $491 QA/QC 4 6 10 10 2 32 $1,934 Respond to 60% PS&E Comments 8 16 4 4 0 32 $2,697 2.2 95% Landscape PS&E package 0 18 20 75 18 131 $6,192 QA/QC 4 4 8 8 0 24 $1,487 Respond to 95% PS&E Comments 10 16 4 4 0 34 $2,895 2.3 100% Landscape PS&E package 0 18 28 18 18 82 $4,535 QA/QC 4 4 8 8 0 24 $1,487 Respond to 100% PS&E Comments 8 16 4 4 0 32 $2,697 2.4 RTL Ready Landscape PS&E package 0 18 28 18 18 82 $4,535 QA/QC 4 4 8 10 0 26 $1,560 Respond to Final PS&E Comments 8 16 4 4 0 32 $2,697 TASK SUBTOTAL: 50 160 183 206 76 0 0 675 $40,312 3.0 Environmental Revalidation Task Management/Meeting attendance 0 $0 Environmental Study Request 0 $0 Environmental Re-evaluation 0 $0 Environmental Commitment Record 0 $0 QA/QC 0 $0 0 $0 1-15 FVP Phase 11 Landscape PSE_overall fee_SBAs Printed: 05/09/2025 Date: Subconsultant: Project Title: Client Reference 05/01 /2025 Parsons 1-15/French Valley Parkway Interchange Phase II - Landscape City of Temecula T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL PROJECT TITLE BUDGET WORKSHEET Page 4 of 4 Contract No. XXXXXXX Estimated Labor Hours L � L O Q _ Y f0 f C CL '' ^3 a) co O co EO Q C C fA Y c6 V m a) p CJ °�' .�? °' °' ( p Raw Labor Description O a .L C i °' a N O N in a 0 E N p S= Q O U I I I Hours I Amount TASK SUBTOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 Total Hours: 50 160 183 206 76 0 0 675 $40,312 Raw Labor Rate: $99.14 $97.00 $51.54 $36.31 $38.46 675 $40,312 Raw Labor Subtotal: $4,957.00 $15,520.00 $9,431.82 $7,479.86 $2,922.96 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Escalation Rate: Unit Price Amount Contract Duration (Years): 1.17 EA $0.67 $0 RAW LABOR: $40,312 OTHER DIRECT COSTS Quantity Mileage $0 $0 115.80% OVERHEAD: $46,681 OTHER DIRECT COSTS: $01 RAW LABOR + OVERHEAD: $86,992 SUBCONSULTANT/VENDOR SERVICES I Amount % DBE? Subtotal - SUBCONSULTANT SERVICES: $0 0.0% DBE Participation: 1 $0 $0.0 10.0% FIXED FEE: SUBCONSULTANTIVENDOR SERVICES $8,699 $0 OTHER DIRECT COSTS: $0 BASE BUDGET: $95,691 1-15 FVP Phase 11 Landscape PSE_overall fee_SB.xls Printed: 05/09/2025 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction May 2023 through February 2025. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW16-01 / 726 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Adopted 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 3,303,969 426,365 170,000 3,900,334 5804-Construction 4,941,062 85,013,938 89,955,000 5805-Construction Engineering 1,032,749 9,868,251 10,901,000 5802-Design & Environmental 19,440,322 29,446 19,469,768 5700-Land Acquisition 13,782,603 740,648 14,523,251 5240-Utilities 1,993 1,993 Total Expenditures 1 42,502,699 96,078,647 170,000 138,751,346 Source of Funds: 4271-CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 4001-General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 4668-1NFRA Grant 11537,255 48,462,745 50,000,000 4170-Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 4002-Measure S 5,561,573 300,012 170,000 6,031,585 4438-Reimbursements 6,023,000 6,023,000 4465-SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 4426-STIP-Surface Transportation 47,600,000 47,600,000 Improvement Program 4473-TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 11472,509 4474-TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 21343,000 4472-TUMF (WRCOG) 113,406,3901 3,327,214 16,733,604 Total Funding 36,289,346 102,292,000 170,000 138,751,346 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 78 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Adopted 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) funds. 2. State Transportation Improvement Program-2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013 ($10,000,000). 3. TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875-PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase II. 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase II. 6. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. 7. TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No. 17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). 79 Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Pickleball Courts, PW21-03 PREPARED BY: Nino Abad, Senior Civil Engineer Samantha Preciado, Assistant Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Pickleball Courts, PW21-03, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the performance bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 100% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On May 14, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to ACT 1 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $2,408,434.95 and authorized the City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $240,843.50. The Pickleball Courts project provided the design and construction of seventeen (17) dedicated concrete pickleball courts surrounded by a 10-ft-high chain link fence with windscreen. The facility also included a 3.5-ft-high interior chain link fence, outdoor amenities, a designated area for portable restrooms with a hand -washing station and two (2) asphalt concrete parking lots with solar -powered security lights. ACT 1 Construction, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from February 11, 2025, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The amount of the contract was $2,408,434.95. There were six (6) construction change orders totaling $182,762.31. The final contract amount totaled $2,591,197.26. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the project and filing and recording the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release 3. Maintenance Bond 4. Project Description 5. Project Location RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Act 1 Construction, Inc., 444 Sixth St. Norco, CA 92860 to perform the following work of improvement: PICKLEBALL COURTS Project No. PW21-03 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on May 27, 2025. That upon said contract the Developers Surety and Indemnity Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PICKLEBALL COURTS Project No. PW21-03 6. The location of said property is: 30875 Rancho Vista Rd, Temecula, California. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27' day of May, 2025. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of May, 2025. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for PICKLEBALL COURTS PROJECT NO. PW21-03 This is to certify that Act 1 Construction, Inc. (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PICKLEBALL COURTS, PROJECT NO. PW21-03, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Pickleball Courts, 30875 Rancho Vista Rd., Temecula, CA 92592 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description I Dollar Amount to Dispute none Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR: Dated: April 21, 2025 i3y:zl,�VkX— Signature Don Trenholm, President Print Name and Title RELEASE R-1 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 0102677 MAINTENANCE BOND for PICKLEBALL COURTS PROJECT NO. PW21-03 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT Act 1 Construction, Inc at 444 6th St, Norco, CA 92860 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a corporation (hereinafter called "Principal"), and (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) Developers Surety and Indemnity Company at 800 SUPERIOR AVENUE E., 21ST FLOOR, CLEVELAND, OH 44114 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly b? ondllun fioetiund ed0 9hTEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of thousand one hundred ninety seven DOLLARS AND twenty six CENTS ($ 2,581,197.26) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 14th day of May , 2024 a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PICKLEBALL COURTS, PROJECT NO. PW21-03. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 11 th day of February 20 25 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred MAINTENANCE BOND MB-1 by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 22nd day of April 12025 (Seal) Developers Surety and Indemnity Company Act 1 Construction, Inc SURETY- PR CIPAL: 01 `1 Allison cam o (Name) ( me) Attorney -In -Fact ce�;6(4 yyf _ ^ (Title) (T(� � ... By: r-- APPROVED AS TO FORM: r )ho In'1 (Name 5e&l Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. MAINTENANCE BOND MB-2 POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR COREPOINTE INSURANCE COMPANY DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY 59 Maiden Lane, 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10038 (212)220-7120 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that, except as expressly limited herein, COREPOINTE INSURANCE. COMPANY and DEVELOPERS SURE fY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, do hereby make, constitute and appoint: Michael R. Strahan, E.B. Strahan and Allison Ocampo of San Diego, CA as its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, deliver and acknowledge, for and on behalfof said companies, as sureties, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship giving and granting unto said Attorney- in -Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary, requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said company could do, but reserving to each of said company full power of substitution and revocation, and all of the acts of said Attomey-in-Fact, pursuant to these presents, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is effective February 2, 2023 and shall expire on December 31, 2025. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed trader and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors ofCOREPOIN"rE INSURANCE COMPANY and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY (collectively, "Company') on February 10, 2023. RESOLVED, that Sam 7.aza President Surety Underwriting, James Bell, Vice President, Surety UnderNritin;, and Craig Dawson. Executive Underwriter, Surety. each an employee of AmTrust North America, Inc., an affiliate of the Company (the "Authorized Signors'), are hereby authorized to execute a Power of Attorney_ qualifying attomey(s)-in-fact named in the Power of Attorney to execute, on behalf of the Company, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, or other suretyship obligations, and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Company be, and each of them hereby is. authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney. RESOLVED, that the signature of any one of the Authorized Signors and the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Company, and the seal of the Company must he affixed to any such Power of Attorney, and any such signature or seal may he affixed by facsimile, and such Power of Attorney shall be valid and binding upon the Company when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COREPOINTE INSURANCE COMPANY and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY have caused these presents to he signed by the Authorized Signor and attested by their Secretary or Assistant Secretary this March 27, 2023 ,��•`� NNSURA •, �•`` AND / '•,, By: • Printed Na Sam Zaza O : •GO ��`'• t� , cq : �1G <c; �2 Title: President, Surety Underwriting ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: SEAL: D '•FCAWP� Y� A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF California COUNTY OF Orange 19Pq 36 'a On this 27 day of March , 2023 , before me, Hoang-Queen Phu Pham , personally appeared Sam Laza who proved to me on the basis ofsatisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to within the instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and that by the signature of the instrument the entities upon behalf which the person acted, executed this instrument. I certify, under penalty of perjup•, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. i0m HOAN&QUYEN P. ►HAJA Notary Public - California Signature Orange County Commission # 2432970 y Comm. ExQires Dec 31, 202i CORPORATE CERTIFICATION "Ihe undersigned, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of CORE-POINTE-LtiSURANCE COMPANY and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, does hereby certify that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boardfi ofjDirectors of said corporations set forth in this Power of Attorney are in force as of the date of this Certification. This Certification is executed in the City of Cleveland, Ohio, this March 19, 2023. noeuSignod by- By: b 4 W M Q5t S Barry W. Moses. Assistant Secrctarg POA No. N/A 68UISIVADESOC_. DocuSignEnvelopeiD:3352BFD6-5E9D-479&837E-C1 E455E653OF Ed. 0323 Signed and sealed this 22nd day of April, 2025 U-I9:/►`71R4 : Z�3 j Z iii A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of San Diego On 4/22/2025 before me, E.B. Strahan, Notary Public personally appeared Allison Ocampo who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/thay< executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(iws), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. %yf E. B. STRAHAN W Notary Public • California San Diego County Commission 4 2406282 Signature (Seal) r `'` °0""w`My Comm, Expires Jun 25, 2026 r ALL-PURPOSECALIFORNIA •. A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On April 23, 2025 Date personally appeared before me, Cheri L. Bower, Notary Public Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Don Trenholm & Tiffany Trenholm Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) glare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that)bethey executed the same in /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by*AWU6 Vtheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. CHERI L, BOWER o COMM, #2458069 z z Notary Public • California Riverside County M4 Comm. Expires Au . 8, 2027 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SignatureC _&� Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this foram to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): _ ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator rl Other: Signer Is Representing: 02015 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 aft _l The I fear[ OF Sru[hern C Iifr..rnia W ir,e Country PICKLEBALL COURTS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: Design and construct new dedicated pickleball courts at Ronald Reagan Sports Park. Benefit: This project will provide City residents with an additional popular amenity for enhanced recreational opportunities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project development, design, and environmental through Fiscal Year 2023-24. Construction in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-03 / 787 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Adopted 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 118,013 248,418 366,431 5804-Construction 2,663,460 2,663,460 5805-Construction Engineering 50,000 50,000 5802-Design & Environmental 138,705 143,282 281,987 5809-Information Technology 200,000 175,000 375,000 Total Expenditures 1 256,7181 3,305,160 175,000 3,736,878 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 256,718 1,193,282 1,450,000 4240-DIF-Quimby 261,000 261,000 4002-Measure S 1,850,878 175,000 2,025,878 Total Funding 256,718 3,305,160 175,000 3,736,878 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 184 Item No. 10 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 13, 2025 CALL TO ORDER at 6:17 PM: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Kalfus. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 13. Approve Action Minutes of April 22, 2025 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of April 22, 2025. CSD BUSINESS 14. Receive Presentation Regarding Options for Limited Reserved Parking at Fourth of July Extravaganza and Provide General Direction Regarding _ the Same (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Schwank and Stewart) Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive a presentation regarding options for limited reserved parking at Fourth of July Extravaganza and provide general direction regarding the same. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion Stewart, Second by Kalfus. The vote reflected unanimous approval. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:57 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 27, 2025 at 5:00 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 11 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing to Approve Temecula Community Service District Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2025-26 PREPARED BY: Paula Majors, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City and the City Council serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution to accept the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the following services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. The four current service levels of the TCSD include: 1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting. 2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Collection. 4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance. 1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting The TCSD Rates and Charges for Service Level B are not proposed to increase from last year's rates. The rate is capped at $25.68 per single family residential. 2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance As a result of various property owner elections, there are two zones subject to an annual rate increase. The rate increase is the lesser of: (1) the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, for the previous calendar year (2) 5% The Annual CPI change for 2025 was 2.61 %. As a result, the following zones will see a 2.61 % increase in the rates for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Zone No. and Name 24-25 Rate 25-26 Rate Increase 6 - Woodcrest County $137.36 $140.94 $3.58 29 - Gallery Portraits $490.26 $503.08 $12.82 3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Service Per the Franchise Agreement with CR&R, the change in CPI and land -fill tipping fees determine the increase/decrease in the annual Service Level D rate and charge. An increase of $5.84 is proposed to the annual rate and charge for Service Level D from $357.84 to $363.68 per residential unit beginning Fiscal Year 2025-26. The increase is due to a CPI increase of 2.01 %, and an overall reduction to the annual rate adjustment to maintain the fund balance in Fund 194. In addition, the County of Riverside's Waste Management Department has indicated that they will be increasing their disposal fees by 2.88% for fiscal year 2025-2026. 4. Service Level R — Unpaved Street and Road Maintenance The TCSD rates and charges for Service Level R are not proposed to increase from their approved per parcel rate. The rate is capped at $115.26 per single-family residential and $57.62 per vacant residential property. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues for July 22, 2025. Staff will proceed with noticing each affected property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges within a minimum of forty-five (45) days prior to the public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated for the TCSD Fiscal Year 2025-26 rates and charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. FY 2025-26 Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the TCSD in the same manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. The TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, servicing and administration of street lights, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and unpaved street maintenance for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates and charges, except for the California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD. This Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD and is available for public inspection. Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and appoints the 22"d day of July 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, as the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time. Section 5. The District Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the Report and of the time and place of the hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 61115. The District Secretary is further directed to give notice, pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution, regarding any increases proposed in the Report with respect to any of the rates and charges. Section 6. The District Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 271h day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Zak Schwank, President N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May 2025, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: FA:0.yll/_\I0�:T97_11 to] 07L1aL10.1a ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary Webb MUNIC-IIIAL t-Ii Preliminary Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Temecula Community Services District Service Levels B, C, R and Refuse & Recycling Collection Prepared For is a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country May 2025 Table of Contents Sections Tables Section i. Engineer's Statement Section 1. Description of Services 1 Section 2. Budgets and Levy Summary 2 Section 3. District Services and Charges 10 Section 4. Changes to the District 16 Section 5. Method of Apportionment 18 Section 6. Tax Roll 21 Table 2-1. Operating Budget Summary for Service Levels B, D and R 3 Table 2-2. Operating Budget for Service Level C 4 Table 2-3. Year over Year Budget Comparison 9 Table 3-1. Service Level B 10 Table 3-2. Service Level C 11 Table 5-1. Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B 18 Table 5-2. Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C 19 Table 5-3. Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level R 20 Table 5-4. Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection 20 Appendices Appendix A. Tax Roll A-1 i. Engineer's Statement AGENCY: CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 61115 Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, this Report is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C, Service Level R and Refuse/Recycling Collection rates and charges for the parcels and territories within the District. A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 202S-2026. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 2025-2026. SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES of the areas covered and the services provided for the Fiscal Year. The description of services shows and describes the existing improvements and is sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements. SECTION 2 A BUDGETS AND LEVY SUMMARY by Service Level of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year. SECTION 3 A description of the DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES by Service Level, describing the method used to apportion the District charges. SECTION 4 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT contains details of changes that have occurred within the District since its inception that could affect the levy. SECTION 5 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT used to calculate the levy for each of the Service Levels. SECTION 6 The TAx ROLL information. Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 i. Engineer's Statement WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (the "City"), effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "District") to provide specified services previously provided by the County of Riverside (the "County") to properties within its jurisdiction. The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors (the "Board") for the District. The District collects property -related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and Charges were set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law"). WHEREAS, each fiscal year, an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report") is prepared, filed, and approved by the Board. This Report describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Parcel Number or Property Identification Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Property Identification Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. The Charges contained in the Report are based on the historical and estimated costs to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as unpaved road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115 the District has prescribed, revised, and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting ("Service Level B"), perimeter landscaping ("Service Level C"), unpaved road maintenance ("Service Level R"), and Refuse/Recycling Collection services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) II Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 i. Engineer's Statement Now, THEREFORE, I Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the Temecula Community Services District, pursuant to the "CSD Law", do hereby submit the following: The District requested Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file an Engineer's Levy Report for Temecula Community Services District (Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) pursuant to the Government Code Section 61115, presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements for Service Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection, for the referenced Fiscal Year, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within each Service Level and Refuse/Recycling Collection in proportion to the special benefit received; This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District. Please note that Albert A. Webb Associates provides engineering advice and related consulting services. Albert A. Webb Associates is not a registered municipal advisor and does not participate in municipal advisory activities, and nothing in this Engineer's Report is, or should be interpreted to be, municipal advisory services or advice. Executed this day of 2025. ALBERTA. WEBB ASSOCIATES Q�n�EssroN L z w N0. 37385 M MATTHEW E. WEBB a PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385 kl� CIyI1. ENGINEER OF WORK Z qrF Or CALII o ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 i. Engineer's Statement Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessments and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2025, by adoption of Resolution No. by the Board of Directors. CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of the Tax Roll and Engineer's Annual Levy Report were filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of 2025. CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) iv Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 1. Description of Services The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City. The District provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to as "Service Levels". Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided in accordance with the Method of Apportionment of the specific service level. Services and improvements provided throughout the District include residential street lighting, perimeter landscape maintenance and slope protection, unpaved road improvement construction and maintenance, and a refuse and recycling collection program. The Service Levels are identified as follows: Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of residential streetlights. Service Level C- Perimeter Landscaping Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the District. Service Level R - Unpaved Road Maintenance Services include the operation and administration of certain unpaved streets and roads maintained by the District. Refuse/Recycling Collection Services include the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program for single-family dwellings. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary The budgets for each Service Level are shown below. Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are levied for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge per Levy Unit" (shown in Table 2-2), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly spreads the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and Refuse/Recycling Collection is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit ("PDU"), which is similar to a per parcel count but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to Section 5, Method of Apportionment. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 2 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Table 2-1 Service Levels B, R and Refuse/Recycling Operating Budget Summary for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025 PERSONNEL Services $0 $0 $74,789 $74,789 Subtotal Personnel Services $0 $0 $74,789 $74,789 OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 5200-S Repair & Maintenance Facilities 5212 $0 $0 $0 $0 Office Supplies 5220 $0 $0 $0 $0 Printing 5222 $0 $0 $0 $0 Election Costs (Offset by Developer Deposits) 5225 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dues and Memberships 5226 $0 $0 $6,500 $6,500 Postage and Packaging 5230 $0 $0 $0 $0 Property Tax Administrative Fees 5231 $17,000 $200 $14,000 $31,200 Utilities 5240 $0 $0 $0 $0 Small Tools and Equipment 5242 $0 $0 $0 $0 Uniforms 5243 $0 $0 $350 $350 Consulting Services 5248 $11,688 $234 $0 $11,922 Other Outside Services 5250 $0 $0 $25,501 $25,501 Public Notices 5256 $0 $0 $23,000 $23,000 Staff Training/Education 5261 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mileage 5262 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Recognition Program 5265 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal5200's $28,688 $434 $69,351 $98,473 Waste Hauling 5315 $0 $0 $10,973,877 $10,973,877 Street Lighting 5319 $455,000 $0 $0 $455,000 Subtotal5300's $455,000 $0 $10,973,877 $11,428,877 Emergency Road Maintenance 5402 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 Landscape Maintenance 5415 $0 $0 $0 $0 Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal5400's $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 Recycling Programs $0 $0 $31,516 $0 Subtotal $0 $0 $31,516 $0 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL DIRECT DISTRICT COSTS $483,688 $10,434 $11,149,533 $11,612,139 EXPENDITURES/REVENUES Contingency Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES / REVENUES $483,688 $10,434 $11,149,533 $11,612,139 CONTRIBUTIONS Contributions from Grants 4025 $0 $0 $250,789 $250,789 Operation Income $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contributions ($174,465) $0 $8,710 ($165,755) Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $0 $4,902 $0 $4,902 TOTAL COLLECTION/CONTRIBUTIONS ($174,465) $4,902 $259,499 $89,936 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 3 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Table 2-2 Service Levels C Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025 Budget FY 2025-2026 DIRECT COSTS Saddlewood 7$9,000 Ranchos Highland The V, neyards • 1' Signet [ Series . • Woodcrest Country . �. Repair & Maintenance / Facility ,500 $1,500 $2,000 $1,000 $2,500 $1,200 Utilities $10,200 $13,200 $1,800 $12,000 $11,400 Landscape Contract $27,511 $19,542 $22,248 $3,816 $20,215 $10,114 Rehabilitation $5,000 $30,000 $15,000 $1,000 $4,300 $9,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $43,011 $61,242 $52,448 $7,616 $39,015 $31,714 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 County Fees $206 $258 $234 $140 $169 $171 Special Tax Consultant $250 $300 $250 $175 $175 $200 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $461 $563 $489 $320 $349 $376 TOTAL• :0 ($5,609) ••- ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution TOTAL•. EDUs ($19,263) ($5,540) 327 ($1,542) ($339) $185 229 478 408 139 $39,025 223 FY 2025-2026 Proposed Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $46.00 $175.00 $140.94 FY 2024-2025 Maximum Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $46.00 $175.00 $137.36 FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $46.00 $175.00 $140.94 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Budget FY 2025-2026 DIRECT COSTS Ridgeview Zone 07 Grove Zone 08 RanchoVillage Solana.. Zone 0• Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,100 $4,500 $500 $1,000 $350 $3,300 Utilities $6,200 $36,000 $1,500 $4,050 $1,200 $27,000 Landscape Contract $6,700 $74,000 $1,017 $3,272 $815 $47,000 Rehabilitation $1,200 $22,000 $2,000 $1,500 $0 $20,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $15,200 $136,500 $5,017 $9,822 $2,365 $97,300 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 County Fees $151 $365 $130 $121 $96 $382 Special Tax Consultant $175 $400 $150 $150 $125 $450 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $331 $770 $285 $276 • 0• $226 $837 TOTAL• ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution ($223) ($245) ($196) ($354) ($141) TOTALASSESSMENT EDUs $15,308 172 $137,025 783 $5,106 111 84 14 831 FY 2025-2026 Proposed Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 FY 2024-2025 Maximum Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary BudgetPresley DIRECT COSTS Develop. I [Zone 13 Morrison 1 Zone 14 1 Barclay Zone J15 Zone 16 Monte I Zone 17 Temeku Zone 18 Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,200 $1,000 $800 $2,000 $105 $3,000 Utilities $12,200 $6,000 $2,300 $4,500 $2,600 $18,000 Landscape Contract $15,500 $6,060 $5,387 $12,807 $953 $49,775 Rehabilitation $5,000 $1,000 $1,500 $25,000 $500 $21,500 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $33,900 $14,060 $9,987 $44,307 $4,158 $92,275 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 County Fees $352 $149 $111 $167 $107 $561 Special Tax Consultant $425 $175 $130 $200 $125 $625 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $782 $329 $246 $372 $237 $1,191 ,. ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution ($458) $385 ($433) ($6,879) ($2,279) $544 EDUs 744 166 :00 56 $37,800 216 46 1,343 FY 2025-2026 Proposed Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 FY 2024-2025 Maximum Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary BudgetCrowne DIRECT COSTS • Vail Sutton Pheasant . Repair & Maintenance / Facility $2,500 $5,500 $15,000 $425 $400 $8,000 Utilities $13,300 $40,000 $45,000 $1,600 $1,900 $42,000 Landscape Contract $33,696 $74,140 $127,430 $2,150 $3,036 $73,000 Rehabilitation $10,000 $60,000 $47,000 $3,000 $3,000 $38,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $59,496 $179,640 $234,430 $7,175 $8,336 $161,000 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 County Fees $176 $447 $710 $104 $238 $659 Special Tax Consultant $200 $500 $850 $125 $250 $750 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $381 $952 $1,565 $234 $493 $1,414 TOTAL•STS $59,877 $180,592 $235,995 $7,409 $8,829 $162,414 ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution ($5,427) ($2,617) ($7,794) ($3,001) ($429) ($314) EDUs 242 1,017 1,769 38 420 1,621 FY 2025-2026 Proposed Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 FY 2024-2025 Maximum Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary BudgetSerena DIRECT COSTS Gallery .. Wolf Gallery Portraits Repair & Maintenance / Facility $2,000 $250 $500 $9,000 $500 Utilities $10,000 $1,000 $5,285 $82,000 $1,050 Landscape Contract $23,595 $815 $3,272 $114,500 $1,340 Rehabilitation $20,000 $0 $1,000 $33,000 $1,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $55,595 $2,065 $10,057 $238,500 $3,890 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 County Fees $168 $94 $137 $723 $95 Special Tax Consultant $200 $100 $150 $800 $110 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $373 $199 $292 $1,528 $210 TOTAL• 00 ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution ($11,968) ($104) ($1,249) ($7,054) $931 E DUs 220 8 130 1,806 10 FY 2025-2026 Proposed Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $503.08 FY 2024-2025 Maximum Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $490.26 FY 2025-2026 Maximum Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $503.08 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 2. Budgets and Levy Summary The following Table provides levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 to the previous fiscal year. Table 2-3 Year -over -Year Budget Comparison FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 ENROLLMENTS To tal FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 % Change PROJECTIONS Total �01 Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting Levy per Levy Unit Levy Single -Family Residential 25,289 25,289 $25.68 $649,421.52 25,289 25,289 0.00% $25.68 $649,421.52 Condominium 680 340 $25.68 $8,731.20 680 340 0.00% $25.68 $8,731.20 68-2914 25,969 25,629 $658,152.72 25,969 25,629 $658,152.72 Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping 111Ri Zone 1 68-2930 327 327 $116.00 $37,932.00 327 327 0.00% $116.00 $37,932.00 Zone 2 68-2931 478 478 $89.00 $42,542.00 478 478 0.00% $89.00 $42,542.00 Zone 3 68-2932 408 408 $116.00 $47,328.00 408 408 0.00% $116.00 $47,328.00 Zone 4 68-2933 139 139 $46.00 $6,394.00 139 139 0.00% $46.00 $6,394.00 Zone 5 68-2934 223 223 $175.00 $39,025.00 223 223 0.00% $175.00 $39,025.00 Zone 6 68-2935 229 229 $137.36 $31,455.44 229 229 2.61% $140.94 $32,275.26 Zone 7 68-2936 172 172 $89.00 $15,308.00 172 172 0.00% $89.00 $15,308.00 Zone 8 68-2937 783 783 $175.00 $137,025.00 783 783 0.00% $175.00 $137,025.00 Zone 9 68-2938 111 111 $46.00 $5,106.00 111 111 0.00% $46.00 $5,106.00 Zone 10 68-2939 84 84 $116.00 $9,744.00 84 84 0.00% $116.00 $9,744.00 Zone 11 68-2940 14 14 $175.00 $2,450.00 14 14 0.00% $175.00 $2,450.00 Zone 12 68-2941 831 831 $116.00 $96,396.00 831 831 0.00% $116.00 $96,396.00 Zone 13 68-2942 744 744 $46.00 $34,224.00 744 744 0.00% $46.00 $34,224.00 Zone 14 68-2943 166 166 $89.00 $14,774.00 166 166 0.00% $89.00 $14,774.00 Zone 15 68-2944 56 56 $175.00 $9,800.00 56 56 0.00% $175.00 $9,800.00 Zone 16 68-2945 216 216 $175.00 $37,800.00 216 216 0.00% $175.00 $37,800.00 Zone 17 68-2946 46 46 $46.00 $2,116.00 46 46 0.00% $46.00 $2,116.00 Zone 18 68-2947 1,343 1,343 $70.00 $94,010.00 1,343 1,343 0.00% $70.00 $94,010.00 Zone 19 68-2948 242 242 $225.00 $54,450.00 242 242 0.00% $225.00 $54,450.00 Zone 20 68-2949 1,017 1,017 $175.00 $177,975.00 1,017 1,017 0.00% $175.00 $177,975.00 Zone 21 68-2950 1,769 1,769 $129.00 $228,201.00 1,769 1,769 0.00% $129.00 $228,201.00 Zone 22 68-2951 38 38 $116.00 $4,408.00 38 38 0.00% $116.00 $4,408.00 Zone 23 68-2952 420 420 $20.00 $8,400.00 420 420 0.00% $20.00 $8,400.00 Zone 24 68-2953 1,621 1,621 $100.00 $162,100.00 1,621 1,621 0.00% $100.00 $162,100.00 Zone 25 68-2954 220 220 $200.00 $44,000.00 220 220 0.00% $200.00 $44,000.00 Zone 26 68-2955 8 8 $270.00 $2,160.00 8 8 0.00% $270.00 $2,160.00 Zone 27 68-2956 130 130 $70.00 $9,100.00 130 130 0.00% $70.00 $9,100.00 Zone 28 68-2957 1,806 1,806 $129.00 $232,974.00 1,806 1,806 0.00% $129.00 $232,974.00 Zone 29 68-2958 10 10 $490.26 $4,902.60 10 10 2.61% $503.08 $5,030.80 Zone 30 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 31 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 32 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 13,651 13,651 $1,592,100.04 13,651 13,651 $1,593,048.06 Service Level R - Road Maintenance Rate Level 1 68-2917 1 55 48 $115.26 $5,532.48 55 48 $115.26 $5,532.48 Citywide Refuse/Recycling Collection 68-2916 1 29,585 29,585 $357.84 $10,586,696.40 29,944 29,944 $363.68 $10,890,033.92 Ill The maximum rate per Levy Unit, for Zones 6, 29, 31 and 32 will escalate by the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), which is 2.61%. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the increase will be 2.61%, the percentage increase in the Annual CPI. Ill Zones 30, 31, & 32 will not be levied for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as the project areas will be maintained by an HOA. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 9 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting Service Level B includes all developed single-family residential parcels, condominiums, and residential vacant lots for which the District provides ongoing servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential lot ($12.84 per condominium unit within Specific Plans) and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Table 3-1 Service Level B E. 04153-00 19872-05 20882-01 21675-04 23063-03 23101-05 23267-02 24135-03 27827-01 29928-00 31053-03 04188-00 19939-00 20882-02 21675-05 23063-04 23101-06 23267-03 24136-00 27827-02 29928-01 31276-00 04457-00 19939-01 20882-03 21675-06 23063-05 23125-00 23267-04 24136-01 27827-03 29928-02 31344-00 06559-00 19939-02 20987-00 21760-00 23063-06 23125-01 23371-00 24136-02 28309-00 29928-03 31898-00 07401-00 20079-00 21067-00 21765-00 23063-07 23125-02 23371-01 24136-03 28480-00 29929-00 32104-00 07402-00 20079-01 21082-00 22148-00 23063-08 23125-03 23371-02 24182-01 28482-00 29929-01 32169-00 08369-00 20079-02 21082-01 22203-00 23064-00 23126-00 23371-03 24182-02 28482-01 30088-00 32170-00 08369-01 20079-03 21082-02 22204-00 23064-01 23128-00 23371-04 24182-03 28482-02 30264-00 32319-00 08369-02 20130-00 21082-03 22208-00 23064-02 23142-00 23371-05 24182-04 28482-03 30264-01 32436-00 11087-01 20130-01 21082-04 22593-00 23064-03 23143-00 23371-06 24183-00 28503-00 30264-02 32436-01 11087-02 20130-02 21340-00 22593-01 23065-00 23143-01 23371-07 24183-01 28510-00 30264-03 32437-00 12189-01 20130-03 21340-01 22593-02 23065-01 23143-02 23371-08 24184-00 28510-01 30264-04 32437-01 12189-02 20130-04 21340-02 22627-00 23065-03 23143-03 23371-09 24184-01 28510-02 30264-05 32437-02 12189-03 20130-05 21340-03 22627-01 23065-04 23143-04 23371-10 24185-00 28510-03 30264-06 32437-03 12189-04 20130-06 21340-04 22715-00 23065-05 23143-06 23371-11 24185-01 28526-00 30264-07 33124-00 12189-05 20153-00 21340-05 22715-01 23066-01 23143-07 23371-14 24185-02 28553-00 30264-08 33125-00 12189-06 20154-00 21340-06 22715-02 23066-02 23143-08 23483-00 24186-00 28553-01 30264-09 34698-00 12189-07 20319-00 21340-07 22716-00 23066-03 23143-09 24131-00 24186-01 28810-00 30264-10 Old Town 13060-01 20643-00 21430-01 22716-01 23066-04 23143-10 24131-01 24186-02 28980-00 30264-11 PM 24387 13060-02 20644-00 21561-00 22716-02 23066-05 23143-11 24131-02 24186-03 29033-00 30264-12 PM 26488 13060-03 20703-01 21672-01 22716-03 23067-02 23173-00 24131-03 24187-00 29036-00 30264-13 PM 27493 13060-04 20703-02 21672-02 22716-04 23067-03 23173-01 24132-00 24187-01 29133-00 30264-14 PM 28122 13060-05 20703-03 21672-03 22761-00 23067-04 23173-02 24132-01 24187-02 29203-00 30264-15 37341-01 13060-06 20735-01 21672-04 22762-00 23067-05 23173-03 24133-00 24188-00 29286-00 30667-00 37341-03 13060-07 20735-02 21673-00 22786-00 23100-01 23173-04 24133-01 24188-01 29734-00 30667-01 37341-04 13060-08 20735-03 21673-01 22915-00 23100-02 23174-01 24133-02 24188-02 29798-00 30667-02 37341-05 18518-00 20735-04 21673-02 22915-01 23100-03 23174-02 24133-03 24188-03 29798-01 30667-03 37341-06 18518-01 20735-05 21673-03 22915-02 23100-04 23174-03 24133-04 24232-00 29798-02 30668-00 37341-07 18518-02 20735-06 21674-00 22915-03 23100-05 23174-04 24133-05 25004-00 29798-03 30668-01 37341-08 18518-03 20735-07 21674-01 22916-00 23100-06 23174-05 24134-00 25004-01 29798-04 30668-02 37341-09 18583-00 20735-08 21674-02 22916-01 23100-07 23174-06 24134-01 25892-00 29798-05 30669-00 37341-10 19872-00 20735-09 21674-03 22916-02 23100-08 23177-00 24134-02 26488-00 29798-06 30669-01 19872-01 20848-00 21675-00 22916-03 23101-01 23209-00 24134-03 26828-00 29798-07 30669-02 19872-02 20879-00 21675-01 22962-00 23101-02 23220-00 24135-00 26828-01 29798-08 31053-00 19872-03 20879-01 21675-02 23063-01 23101-03 23267-00 24135-01 26828-02 29798-09 31053-01 19872-04 20882-00 21675-03 23063-02 23101-04 23267-01 24135-02 27827-00 29798-10 31053-02 Temecula Services District (Service Level $ C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 10 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping Service level C includes all developed single-family and condominium residential parcels and residential vacant lots for which the District provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public rights -of -way and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required in these tracts and subdivisions varies depending on operating costs. Thirty-two (32) Zones with corresponding rates have been established within Service Level C. In recent fiscal years, the cost of maintaining the perimeter landscaping for most zones in Service Level C, far accede the maximum assessment that can be levied against the parcels in these zones. As a result, it has been necessary for City staff to reduce services and activities and/or reduce or eliminate the collection of funding for long term repairs, replacements and rehabilitation. The current rates and charges for Service Level C is per residential lot and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Table 3-2 Service Level C Zone No. 1 Maximum Rate: $116.00 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Tract Name: 7 maximum 11 Proposed 11 Tract Numbers: Winchester Creek 20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06 21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06 Zone No. 3 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $116.00 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Numbers: Rancho Highlands 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00 Zone No. 4 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $46.00 I Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Numbers: The Vineyards 0800 08 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Signet Series 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03 Zone No. 6 (3) Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $137.37 I Proposed Rate: $140.94 Tract Numbers: (3) Beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the base rate for Zone 6 was $95.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the adjustment is 2.61%, the annual increase in the CPI. Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Ridgeview 1 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 8 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Village Grove 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21637-01 21637-02 21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01 21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06 Tract Name: laximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Numbers: Rancho Solana 22593-00 22593-01 22593-02 Zone No. 10 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $116.00 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Numbers: V Own . - : 11 Zone No. 11 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $175.00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Numbers: -... -BTURITIM Zone No. 12 Maximum Rate: ii 1 Proposed00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Vintage Hills 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03 22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01 22916-02 22916-03 Zone No. 13 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Numbers: Presley Development 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01 26861-02 26861-03 Zone No. 14 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $89.00 I Proposed Rate: $89.00 Tract Numbers: Morrison Homes W,: reI Zone No. 15 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $175.00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Numbers: Barclay Estates �I Zone No. 16 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Numbers: Tradewinds 1 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03 Zone No. 17 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Numbers: Monte Vista 1• Brim No. 18 Maximum Rate: $70.00 ProposedZone Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Temeku Hills 23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23771-04 23771-05 23371-06 23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 12 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 19 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $225.00 Tract Numbers: Chantemar 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03 Zone No. 20 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Crowne Hill 23143-00 23143-02 23413-03 23413-04 23413-01 23413-03 23413-04 23413-06 23413-07 23413-08 23413-09 23413-10 23413-11 Zone No. 21 Tract Name: maximum Rate: 00 ... 00 Tract Numbers: Vail Ranch Gated Community 28832-00 Vail Ranch Residential 23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02 23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 Zone No. 22 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $116.00 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Numbers: Sutton Place II No. 23 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $20.00 ProposedZone Tract Numbers: Pheasant Run 19872 19872-01 19872-02 19872-03 19872-04 19872-05 Zone No. 24 Maximum Rate: $100.00 Proposed Rate: $100.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Harveston 29928 29928-01 29928-02 29928-03 29929 29929-01 30088 30667 30667-01 30667-02 30667-03 30668 30668-01 30668-02 30669 30669-01 30669-02 31053 31053-01 31053-02 31053-03 32436 32436-01 32437 32437-01 32437-02 32437-03 34698 Harveston Ashville 1 31276 Harveston Ashville II 32104 Harveston Condos 32169 32170 Zone No. 25 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $200.00 Proposed Rate: $200.00 Tract Numbers: ROOM�• Zone No. 26 Tract Name: Zone No. 26 Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $270.00 Proposed Rate: $270.00 Tract Numbers: Traditions/Gallery Homes 1 29133 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Avondale 26828 26828-01 26828-02 Zone No. 28 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $129.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Wolf Creek 29798 29798-01 29798-02 29798-03 29798-04 29798-05 29798-06 29798-07 29798-08 29798-09 30264 30264-01 30264-02 30264-03 30264-04 30264-05 30264-06 30264-07 30264-08 30264-09 30264-10 30264-11 30264-12 30264-13 30264-14 30264-15 31898 33125 32319 33124 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 13 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 29 (4) Name: Maximum Rate: $490.27 I Proposed Rate: $503.08 Tract Numbers: GalleryTract •• �� @� (4) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 29 was $315.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 29 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the adjustment is 2.61%, the annual increase in the CPI. Zone No. 30 (5)(6) Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $129.00 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Numbers: .. • (6) The maximum rate for Zone 30 is $129.00. (6) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Zone No. 31(7)(8) Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $41.52 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Numbers: Roripaugh Ranch TBD (71 Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 31 was $26.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 31, the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the adjustment is 2.61%, the annual increase in the CPI. (8) Zone 31 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Zone No. 32 (9)(10) Tract Name: Maximum Rate: $949.61 Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Numbers: Vineyard View (91 Beginning Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the base rate for Zone 32 was $640.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for Zone 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026 the adjustment is 2.61%, the annual increase in the CPI. (10) Zone 32 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Service Level R, Road Maintenance Service Level R provides funding for construction, improvement, service, and maintenance of unpaved public streets and roads within specific areas of the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to, renovation or restoration due to damage, flood and drainage control, repairs and re -grading, and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are spread among all parcels within various areas ("rate levels") of Service Level R in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the service level. Service Level R currently has one (1) active rate level, Rate Level R-1. The area for Rate Level R-2 has been fully paved and therefore an assessment is currently not required. Only the parcels within Rate Level R-1 boundary area will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. • RATE LEVEL R-1—This rate level consists of fifty-five (55) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for the servicing and maintenance of Kimberly Lane, Greenwood Lane, Liefer Road, Gatlin Road, and Pala Vista. A total of 1.546 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. The current maximum rates and charges in R-1 are $115.26 per single-family residential lot and $57.62 per vacant residential lot. • RATE LEVEL R-2 — This rate level consists of forty (40) assessable parcels that have direct access to Santiago Road. This area has been fully paved and no longer requires service under this District. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 14 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 3. District Services and Charges Refuse/Recycling Collection The Refuse/Recycling Collection Service Level provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program, including recycling services for all developed residential homes (or "Households") within the District. The rate and charge for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Refuse/Recycling Collection is $363.68 per Household and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 15 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 4. Changes to the District Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include but are not limited to, changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided, addition of new services or Service Levels, restructuring of the current Service Levels, inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels, or revisions to the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following. Notable Previous Modifications to the District Two Service Levels Replaced with a Special Tax On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997-1998 the below two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District. • COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION — This service level provided for the maintenance, service, and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. • SERVICE LEVEL A, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING AND MEDIANS — This service level provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting, and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Service Level R As of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the streets have been fully paved and there is no longer a need to assess for unpaved road maintenance (Rate level R-2). Proposed Modifications to the District for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 is related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District may accept additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts would be included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development would be included in these two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in the Refuse/Recycling Collection when a new single-family residential unit is identified, and service is ordered. Service Level B In Fiscal Year 2022-2023 the District conducted a successful Proposition 218 ballot proceeding and annexed 545 parcels into Service Level B. Another successful Proposition 218 ballot proceeding was conducted in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and an additional 138 parcels were annexed into Service Level B. Service Level C The annual revenue collected for the majority of the Zones in Service Level C is not sufficient to cover the costs to maintain these zones. Due to the rising costs, the District has had to reduce services to the maintenance of the perimeter landscaping for these zones. In Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the District conducted a Proposition 218 ballot proceeding to increase the assessment rates for Zones 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22 and 27. The majority of the ballots received were in opposition to the increased assessments in all zones, and the increase was therefore not applied. The assessment rates, for 27 of the 29 zones currently assessed in Service Level C, have not increased since the zones were established. Because the costs continue to increase and the assessments have stayed the same, the service will remain limited and may have to be reduced further due to limited annual funds. In Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the District terminated the flood channel easements in Zone 7 therefore eliminating the need for maintenance of said areas. This action resulted in the termination of the assessment for only the sixteen (16) parcels affected, effective Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Temecula Services District (Service Level $ C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 16 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 4. Changes to the District In December of 2020, the District initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the maintenance services of the landscape areas in Service Level C. The new maintenance contract that was awarded and approved by the Board resulted in a reduction in the budgeted maintenance cost for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The new contract was effective July 1, 2021. There are no new inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping) proposed for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Service Level R There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance) proposed for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Refuse/Recycling Collection A total of 359 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and added to Refuse/Recycling Collection for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. New residential parcels are identified each year and included in Refuse/Recycling Collection based upon the waste hauler's updated service records. The rate for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 for Refuse/Recycling Collection is $363.68 per residential parcel. For Fiscal Year 2024-2025, the rate for this service was $357.84. For more information, please refer to Section 2, Budgets and Levy Summary. The costs for the District represent actual service costs, as provided in the City's Franchise Agreement with CR&R Waste Services. Temecula Services District (Service Level $ C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 17 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 5. Method of Apportionment Method of Apportionment The cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each eligible property. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting): The following formula is used to calculate each property's Service Level B charges by the per parcel/unit (residential "lot/unit") method. Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) _ (Total Residential Lots + Assigned Condominium Units) = Parcel Charge Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Refuse/Recycling Collection: The following formula is used to calculate each property's charges by the per parcel (residential "lot") method. Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) / Total Residential Lots (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge Service Level R (Roads): The charge per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Parcel Development Units =1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in Rate Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. Table 5-1 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B (11) Defined as Assigned Condominium Units in Service Level B for which the interior streetlights are privately maintained however, the Assigned Condominium Units benefit from perimeter or collector street lighting funded by Service Level B. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 18 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 5. Method of Apportionment Table 5-2 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C p. Property Residential Lot Zone No. 1 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 2 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 3 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 4 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 5 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 6 (12) 1.00 $140.94 $140.94 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 7 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 8 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 9 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 10 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 11 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 12 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 13 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 14 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 15 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 16 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 17 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 18 1.00 $70.00 $70.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 19 1.00 $225.00 $225.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 20 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 21 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 22 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 23 1.00 $20.00 $20.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 24 1.00 $100.00 $100.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 25 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 26 1.00 $270.00 $270.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 27 1.00 $70.00 $70.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 28 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 29 (12) 1.00 $503.08 $503.08 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 30 (13) 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 31 (12)(14) 1.00 $41.52 $0.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 32 (12)(14) 1.00 $949.61 $0.00 Per Parcel (12) Beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zones 29 and 31 and beginning Fiscal Year 2009-10 for Zones 6 and 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5.00%. (13) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 has elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. (14) Zones 31 and 32 Zone 31 elected to have the perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zones will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 19 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 5. Method of Apportionment Table 5-3 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level K Property Type and Zone x Parcel Parcel Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential Lot R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel Vacant Residential Lot R-1 0.50 $115.26 $57.62 Per Parcel Table 5-4 Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection (15) Developed residential parcels identified by CRU for which refuse collections are available. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 20 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 6. Tax Roll Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 21 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 APPENDIX A Tax Roll (On file with the City Clerk) Webb MVNICIPAL FINANCE Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA/TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT/SARDA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/Board of Directors FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager/General Manager/Executive Director DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Adopt Fiscal Year 2025-26 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director/Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-30 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025- 26 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2026-30, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 DISCUSSION: At its May 22, 2025 Budget Workshop, the City Council was presented the Proposed Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program and 2025-26 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City, Temecula Community Services District (TCSD), and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (SARDA). The attached Transmittal Letter summarizes the highlights of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Proposed Annual Operating Budget and Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program documents. The list of adjustments noted below were discussed at the Council Workshop, and will be incorporated into the Final Annual Budget and CIP: - Care Solace Contract: $45,000 added to the TCSD Operations budget for a 6-month contract, with an option to extend the contract if desired. - Fire Mitigation Management: $250,000 added to the Fire Department budget, via a transfer from Measure S, for vegetation mitigation. - Acceleration of Pension Liability Paydown: $10,000,000 in additional discretionary payments to Ca1PERS from the following sources: o $5,000,000 via a transfer of funds from Fund 006-Fire Facility Acquisition Fund, to be paid back to Fund 006 with the savings generated from the acceleration of the debt paydown within 5-years o $2,000,000 in available General Fund Balance o $2,000,000 from the City's PARS Pension Trust o $1,000,000 via a tranfer of uncommitted funds from Fund 110-Community Reinvestment Program Fund - La Paz Road Roundabout Reconstruction CIP (New Project): $3,000,000 added to the Capital Improvement Program, from Measure S Funding o Including the reallocation of $1,000,000 from the Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide project Additionally, the following list of administrative corrections will also be reflected in the Final Budget: - Emergency Management: $6,000 appropriation for Narcan training for staff and the community Information Technology/Support Services: Reallocate $100,055 in Project Salaries from Fund 320 — Information Technology to Fund 330 — Support Services due to a reassignment of duties. Various Revenue reductions across several Funds - ($193,109) due to a programming error in the City's budget software system that mistakenly duplicated several line items, plus any resulting impacts to the Internal Service Fund Allocations. - Various Expenditure reductions across several Fund/Departments - ($96,596) due to a programming error in the City's budget software system that mistakenly duplicated several line items, plus any resulting impacts to the Internal Service Fund Allocations. FISCAL IMPACT: The specific fiscal impacts are noted in the Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program and Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget documents. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Transmittal Letter 2. Resolution - Approving the CIP for Fiscal Years 2026-30 and Adopting the CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 3. Resolution - Adopting the Fiscal Year 2025-26 TCSD Preliminary Annual Operating Budget 4. Resolution — Approving the SARDA CIP Fiscal Years 2026-30 and Adopting the CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and Adopting the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget 5. Resolution - Adopting the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget 6. Resolution - Schedule of Authorized Positions with attachments 7. Resolution - Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2025-26 with attachment City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget May 27, 2025 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: I am pleased to submit the Annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-26. This budget document was developed to serve as the financial plan for the City's programs and policies. It reflects the resources necessary to meet the goals, programs, and service priorities that the City Council is committed to providing its citizens. The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget has been developed after a considerable review process. Departmental budget submittals were prepared and reviewed by line item in connection with projected revenues. Detailed performance objectives and accountability measures were developed consistent with the City's Quality of Life Master Plan. Five-year revenue and expenditure projections were developed to identify the future impacts of proposed staffing and program changes, as well as the impact of proposed capital improvement projects. The resulting budget is realistic and balanced and continues to provide quality services to the community while effectively utilizing available resources. As you will read below, the City's General Fund is not only balanced for the ensuing fiscal year, but also projected to be balanced for the next five fiscal years. Additionally, the City's reserve funds are fully funded across all five years of the long-range financial forecast. CITY OF TEMECULA PROFILE The City of Temecula is a dynamic community comprised of approximately 112,220 citizens. The City maintains 42 parks on 337 developed acres throughout the community, which provide recreation opportunities for both the citizens of Temecula, as well as surrounding communities. Law Enforcement and Fire Protection services are provided through contracts with the County of Riverside. Known as Southern California's Wine Country, the City of Temecula is a nationally and internationally known tourist destination welcoming over 3 million visitors a year. Temecula is also an innovative, dynamic economic powerhouse and job center for the region, all the while retaining its small-town charm and character that residents cherish. Offering the finest quality of life, Temecula is listed among the safest cities in the State and Nation per FBI statistics. With a diverse population, citizens enjoy picturesque neighborhoods, a vast array of beautifully manicured parks and trails, multi -cultural dining options, retail stores that include the region's premier shopping destination Promenade Temecula, the highest rated School District in Riverside County for its outstanding academic scores, higher education opportunities including Mount San Jacinto College's Temecula Campus and Cal State San Marcos at Temecula. As a visitor destination, Temecula also offers a vibrant Old Town with boutique shops, outdoor markets, and a distinct foodie district, Pechanga Resort Casino, Southern California's Wine Country speckled each 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 IV The i",L-Ar�o€sa� .c 1 morning with hot air balloons hovering over grapevines and equestrian trails, championship golf courses, Vail Ranch Historic Headquarters comprised of turn -of -the -century old west structures restored into specialty restaurants and retail, and City of Temecula signature events, parades, museums and a theater. Temecula's scenic landscape of rolling hills, vineyards and wineries are swept clean each afternoon with fresh ocean breezes that funnel through the Santa Margarita gap of the coastal mountains providing an ambience that magnifies the beauty of the City and Temecula Valley. ECONOMIC INDICATORS City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget The City of Temecula monitors several economic and demographic indicators, which play a role in the development of revenue projections. 0 t 0 0 ift *� Population Median Age Households Average Median # of Jobs Unemployment 112,220 37.5 years 36,914 Income Home Price Rate 4.6% $771 $145,129 54400 a,000 (Mar'25) (Mar'25) (Apr'25) • Estimated Population: up 1.2%from 2024 (Source: State Department of Finance) • Median Age: down from 37.7 in 2024 (source: Pop -Facts Report, 2-13-25) • Number of Households: down 0.7% from 2024 (source: Pop -Facts Report, 2-13-25) • Average Household Income: up 2.3% from 2024 (Source: Pop -Facts Report, 2-13-25) • April Median Home Price: up 6.2%from 2024 (source: Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors) • Number of Jobs: up 0.2% from April 2024 (source: EDD) • March Unemployment Rate: up from 4.1% in April 2024 (Riverside County: 5.1%, CA: 5.3%, Nation: 4.2% (Source: EDD & BLS) Temecula has experienced slight increases in the majority of the above economic indicators. Population has increased 1.2% after two consecutive years of declines. Housing prices continue to climb due to the low inventory, with a 6.2% increase in the median home price. Temecula's average household income has increased by 2.3%, while the number of jobs has remained relatively flat over the prior year. Unemployment has increased slightly, but remains lower than both Riverside County and the State. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget LOCAL ECONOMY AND LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS Local Economy As the economic indicators noted above have improved over 2024, the impact to the local economy is evident in the retail activity and sales tax trends. Despite a flattening of Sales Tax revenue in the current year, it is projected to grow at a modest 2.5% next fiscal year, as both national retailers and local entrepreneurs continue to invest in Temecula by opening businesses, undergoing expansion projects and starting new construction. Currently, there are seventeen new businesses slated to open soon, including a hotel, multiple retailers, restaurants and breweries. In addition, several auto dealers are undergoing expansions within the Temecula Auto Mall. R�inNrn�€ l � :r �� 88 QQ`p L 1,P1 Este �rYv� 201 rw��t With Temecula's regional shopping mall, Old Town district, and auto mall, shoppers from the entire Temecula Valley region contribute to the City's sales tax base. Temecula residents generated $37,209 in sales tax per capita in 2024, which far outpaced neighboring cities and statewide averages. Per Capita Sales Temecula Riverside County Southern California California 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 21 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 24 24 24 Source: HdL Companies Legislative Impacts $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 The City of Temecula actively follows state and federal legislative proposals each year and works closely with the League of California Cities and the National League of Cities to stay informed and engaged to ensure the City supports legislation that aligns with the City's local legislative platform guiding principles: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget I. Preservation of Local Control - Support measures that preserve and protect the City's general law powers and duties to enact legislation and policy direction concerning local affairs. Oppose measures that preempt local authority. II. Promotion of Fiscal Stability - Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, and financial independence. Support measures that preserve and promote the City's revenue base. Oppose measures that mandate costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefit. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the county, state, or federal government, without offsetting benefit. III. Support Funding Opportunities -Support measures that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding including competitive grants and other funding programs. Support measures that promote dedicated funding streams at the regional, state and federal levels allowing the City to maximize local revenues, offset and leverage capital expenditures, and maintain City goals and standards. Recent legislation that potentially impacts the City's operations include the following: Senate Bill 937 Impact Fee Deferral - SB 937 was signed into law on September 19, 2024 and became effective January 1, 2025. This new law prohibits the local agencies from collecting the fees or charges from a Designated Residential Development Project for the construction of public improvements or facilities until the first occupancy certificate or first temporary certificate of occupancy is issued. The local agency may collect utility service fees at the time of application for service. It may charge the fees prior to the certificate of occupancy if construction does not begin within five years of the date the building permit is issued. The local agency may require the payment of these fees or charges at an earlier time if the conditions specified in the code are met. Assembly Bill 1868 Property Taxation on Affordable Housing — AB 1868 was enacted in 2024 and became effective on January 1, 2025. The bill primarily deals with property taxation and affordable housing, specifically focusing on how county assessors value property for tax purposes when its subject to restrictions for affordable housing. It establishes a rebuttable presumption that the value of property subject to certain affordable housing contracts is no more than the sum of the first mortgage and down payment GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The City Council recently adopted the Temecula 2040 Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) in November 2022. The Temecula 2040 Plan is a living document that reflects the vision and long-term goals of the City. As Temecula continues S C UL to grow and mature, the Temecula 2040 Plan will be a crucial part of not only4 maintaining the City's quality of life, but to take a proactive approach and identify specificL MPfic community needs, goals, and possible improvements. The 0 City of Temecula utilizes the QLMP to formulate and budget Citywide projects. In addition, the QLMP is used to guide planning, investment decisions, to provide vision and continuity for the next phase of the City's journey, and for -- continuous process improvement in partnership with Temecula's residents. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget To incorporate the QLMP into the City's budget process, the QLMP includes specific goals based on the Core Values of the QLMP. These goals are used by each department to develop short-term objectives and performance measures for completion in the upcoming fiscal year and are reflected in the Department Information and Performance Measures sections of the budget document. The QLMP outlines 7 Core Values: Sustainable &Resilient City © Healthy & Livable City Transportation Mobility &Connectivity Economic Prosperity Accountable & Responsive City rill Government Safe & Prepared Community Equity BUDGET OVERVIEW The Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Budget reflects a structurally balanced, healthy fiscal outlook across all major funds for the City of Temecula. General Fund, Special Revenue Funds and TCSD Fund revenues are growing, albeit at a modest pace, and expenditures include all contractually obligated increases offset by various budget reductions necessary to partially absorb rising costs in Public Safety departments. Major changes from the prior Operating Budget are summarized below. Revenue & Expenditures & Change in Fund Category Transfers In Transfers Out Fund Balance Variance Analysis Change from Change from from Prior Prior Year Prior Year Year Revenue growth attributable to Sales Tax, Measure S Tax and Interest GENERAL FUNDS 9,119,015 (22,028,106) (4,082,295) Earnings. Expenditure reduction due to reduced Capital Project funding, offset by 5.2% increase in Operating Expenditures. Revenue growth attributable to Development Impact Fees. Expenditure SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 3,437,195 (13,157,830) 1,745,437 reduction due to reduced Capital Project funding from Development Impact Fees, Measure A, Affordable Housing and Road Maintenance Funds. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Revenue growth attributable to the TCSD Operations and Library Funds. (TCSD) 636,008 573,888 (627,045) Expenditure growth due to higher salaries, benefits and internal service fund allocations. Revenue decline due to reduced Redevelopment Property Tax Trust SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT (595660) 429Fund distributions due to the wind down of the former Redevelopment AGENCY ,,997 55,382 Agency. Expenditure increase due partly to Depreciation which had not been budgeted in the prior year. Revenue decline due to one-time transfers in the prior year from the Information Technology Fund to the Technology Replacement Fund, and INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (4,210,438) (3,351,405) 212,877 a reduced Transfer in from the Measure S Fund to the Facilities Replacement Fund. Expenditure decline due to reduced Capital Project funding and one-time transfers. BUDGETEDr 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Assumptions, combined with known contractual obligations are used in forecasting revenue sources, expenditure trends, as well as the long-term financial forecasts. Current year revenue assumptions are based on multiple factors, including input from the City's Sales Tax and Property Tax consultants, input from the State of California, local economic trends and development activity. Assumptions beyond the current year include general inflationary growth projections plus any known development projects, new hotels, expanding businesses and any other specific data that may impact revenue growth. The table below summarizes the growth assumptions for the General Fund Five - Year Revenue Forecast: Summary of Revenue Assumptions FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY29-30 Property Tax 4.4% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Sales and Use Tax 2.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.5% 3.5% Less: Sales Tax Sharing Agreement 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Franchise Fees -7.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Transient Occupancy Tax 1.6% 3.0% 3.0% 5.0% -1.9% Special Tax (Measure Q 9.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Licenses, Permits and Service Charges 13.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Fines and Forfeitures 13.7% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Use of Money and Property 29.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Intergovernmental Revenues 4.2% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Reimbursements 5.1% 4.6% 4.9% 4.4% 3.9% Miscellaneous -17.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Assumptions used in forecasting Operating expenditures include the following: ■ Contractual obligations: o Negotiated cost of living adjustment of 2.3% for City employees o Public Safety labor contracts (9.5% for Sheriff positions, 17.5% for Fire positions) o Reclassification of 23 full-time authorized positions o CalPERS Pension cost sharing of 3% for eligible employees ■ Council policies: o Continuation of the Debt/Liability Paydown Strategy ($8,267,833 in FY25-26 for additional discretionary payments towards the City's CalPERS unfunded pension liability) o Annual Replacement allocations for Fleet, Technology, Facilities, Support Services, Street Maintenance and Street Light assets. ■ Expected savings achieved from the Debt/Liability Paydown Strategy ($18.5 million over the ensuing five fiscal years) ■ Actuarially determined contributions to the City's pension and retiree health programs ■ Estimated inflation for non -personnel related expenditures 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget The HL-Ar�o€sau�.c 1 GENERAL FUND ANALYSIS The General Fund forecast over the coming five years is balanced, with its Reserve for Economic Uncertainty and its FY25-26 General Fund Balance $35,523,239 Secondary Reserve fully funded in all five years. 40,0DQ0W 35.00Q000 Available {unau�gnedj Ending fund balance for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is projected to �� Nod galanee Assignedl be $35,523,239, of which $26,680,709 is committed to "ow, "' '0 Committed fulfilling the Fund's policy -level reserves of 25% of Operating go" seUry Reserve (5%) Expenditures. A total of $465,524 of fund balance is 1,.,M Reserve for Economic committed to cover the costs of a Sheriffs Deputy ;Z.;" position funded by the Pechanga Tribe. A total of $8,377,005 in fund balance is unassigned and available for one-time appropriations. General Fund Revenue Highlights General Fund revenue is projected to increase by 7.6% over the prior year with a total of $113,978,529. Tax revenues, excluding the transfer from Measure S Fund, are projected to increase by 3%. The transfer of Measure S increases significantly to fund contractual increases in Public Safety expenditures. The General Fund major revenue sources are summarized below: • Sales Tax ($47,340,358) is projected to increase by 2.5% over the prior fiscal year as taxable retail sales are projected to increase slightly, although there are still concerns about the overall trajectory of the economy. • Property Tax ($12,164,898) is projected to increase by 4.4%, due to a stable housing market. Pro art Tax revenue for Fiscal Fiscal Year 2025-26 General Fund Revenue - $113,978,529 Franchise Fees TOT Prop. Tax in Lieu of 4% Measure 0 VLF 2% 10% Licenses/Permits 6% Property Tax 11% —Measure 5 12% Transfers In 5% Sales Tax Reimbursements 40% Other 4% 2% P Y Year 2025-26 is based on assessed valuation from the year prior, which have shown steady growth, as inventory is still low and home prices continue to rise slightly. • Franchise Fees ($4,229,094) are projected to decrease by 7.4% due to lower natural gas rates and continuing declines in cable subscribers. • Transient Occupancy Tax ($4,500,000) is projected to increase by 1.6% over the prior year. Both occupancy rates and the average daily hotel rates have leveled off recently due to concerns over the economy. With the opening of a new hotel in Fiscal Year 2025-26, Transient Occupancy Tax is expected to grow. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget • Licenses, Permits & Service Charges ($6,623,241) are projected to increase by 13% due to the continuation of development activity within the City. • Intergovernmental Revenues ($11,713,171) are projected to increase by 4.2% due to the increases expected in Property Tax In Lieu of Vehicle License Fees which is driven by property value assessments within the City. • Operating Transfers In ($5,428,738) are projected to decrease by 35.5% due to a $3 million reduction in the transfer from the City's Pension Trust, in accordance with the City's Debt/Liability Paydown Strategy to fully fund the accrued pension liability by Fiscal Year 2028-29. • Operating Transfers In - Measure S ($13,548,319) will continue to fund 11 Sheriff Deputies, staffing for Fire Station No. 95, funding for the future replacement of the newly acquired fire ladder truck and inspection vehicles, and enhanced park maintenance services. General Fund Expenditure Hiahlights The largest expenditure of the General Fund is Public Safety, making up 55% of total General Fund expenditures. In accordance with the Measure S ballot language and City Council appropriation guidelines, the City has invested heavily in Public Safety over the past several years and continues to hold Public Safety as its highest priority. In addition to the ongoing Measure S-funded Public Safety expenditures, the Sheriff Department will continue to exceed the staffing goal of one officer per 1,000 residents and the Fire Department will continue to provide four firefighter personnel per engine at all five fire stations. General Fund expenditures total $106,722,837, which represents an 8% increase over the prior fiscal year. • Sheriff Department ($48,474,402) is increasing by 11.1% over the prior year due to inflationary adjustments in the contract with Riverside County, including a new multi -year labor agreement which includes successive pay adjustments. The budget reflects 117 Sworn Deputies, which includes continued patrol coverage of 210 hours per day, and full staffing for the Metro and CORE Teams. The budget also includes the replacement of four motorcycles. • Fire Department ($13,923,013) is increasing by 25.6% due to inflationary adjustments in the contract with Riverside County combined with the reversal of a one-time CalPERS Retirement offset administered by the State in FY2024-25. The total Fire budget of $26.4 million is offset by the Structural Fire Tax Credit of $12.4 million. The department employs 79 positions and provides four firefighters per engine/truck staffing model. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Non -Safety Departments ($47,128,746) represents a 3.1% increase over the prior year, due primarily to the reclassification of several positions and the calculated 2.3% cost of living adjustment in accordance with the City's labor agreements. Non -Departmental (-$2,803,324) includes the projected savings in the CaIPERS unfunded liability offset by the Retiree Medical Contribution and Property Tax Administrative fees. Operating Transfers Out & One -Time Payments This category of expenditures reflects funds that are transferred to meet the Debt/Liability Paydown Strategy, to the Capital Improvement Program and the Fire Facility Acquisition Fund. • CAPERS Unfunded Pension Liability ($8,267,833) to further reduce the City's annual pension costs by an estimated $3.5 million per year. • Capital Improvement Fund ($500,000) to support the General Plan Update project. Overall, the General Fund remains structurally balanced, with revenues exceeding expenditures, and reserves are fully -funded each year of the ensuing five-year financial forecast. The City continues to budget in a conservative, yet realistic, manner while keeping close watch on several economic indicators. As conditions change throughout the fiscal year, adjustments to revenue or expenditure budgets will be recommended to the City Council for their approval. MEASURE S FUND With the approval of a one -cent transactions and use tax measure in November 2016, the Measure S Fund was established to account for this new revenue source. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Measure S revenue is projected to be $40,028,469. Measure S appropriations of $42,771,911 reflect the priorities established in Budget Policy IV — Transactions and Use Tax Funding. Public Safety (32°0) The budget includes $13,754,539 of Measure S funding to support the contracts for the Sheriff and Fire Departments. Measure S provides for 11 Sheriff's Deputies, staffing for Fire Station No. 95, and funding for the future replacement of the newly acquired fire ladder truck and inspection vehicles. Asset Management/Investment (5%) As noted in Council's appropriation guidelines for Measure S, ensuring adequate reserves are set aside for the future replacement of City -owned assets is critical to the long-term viability of the City's operations. For Fiscal Year 2025-26, Measure S is contributing $1,250,000 to the Facilities Replacement Fund, and $1,000,000 to the Streets Maintenance Fund. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Capital Improvement Program (21%) The budget includes an additional $8,809,109 appropriation in Fiscal Year 2025-26 to complement the current year budget of $34,283,385 to fund multiple CIP projects. The influx on Measure S funding has allowed the City to leverage other funding sources, such as Development Impact Fees and various grant funds, to complete projects in a timelier manner. Major Projects funded by Measure S include: • Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage - to construct a gym, storage room and a second garage at the station to house the squad and additional vehicles. • Fire Station 84 Renovation — to completely renovate the existing station including the addition of a gym, upgraded electrical, windows, paint and renovated living quarters. • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink - to renovate the existing outdoor hockey rink by installing new flooring, dasher boards, scoreboard and a roof structure. • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park — to remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art street skate plaza elements. General/Community Services (42%) The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has historically been funded with voter -approved Measure C funding and program -related revenue. Measure S funding is used to augment Measure C, in order to maintain the award -winning programs, activities and events TCSD provides to the citizenry. • TCSD Operations contribution - $16,480,467 • Library contribution - $1,384,016 • Enhanced Custodial Services - $93,780 The ending fund balance within the Measure S Fund is projected to be $24,605,093, which will carry - forward to the ensuing fiscal year. Over the forecasted five-year period, Measure S is projected to have adequate resources to fund public safety, asset management, capital projects and general services. OTHER GENERAL FUNDS Fund 006 — Fire Facility Acquisition Fund: This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2021-22 to accumulate resources to acquire and/or construct property for a future Fire Station. The ending fund balance is projected to be $5,031,293 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Fund 110 — COVID-19 Pandemic Community Reinvestment Program Fund: This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2021-22 to provide grant funding to support the local economy to rebound from the global pandemic. A total of $14,080,000 was transferred into this fund from available General Fund balance. The Council approved six funding categories, including: (1) Business Support ($3,080,000); (2) Non -Profit Support ($1,000,000); (3) Homeless Services ($1,000,000); (4) Housing Assistance ($5,500,000); (5) Behavioral Health Services ($1,500,000) and (6) Higher Education/Workforce Development ($1,000,000), leaving $1,000,000 subject to further Council appropriation. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget MAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for activities paid for by taxes or other designated revenue sources that have specific limitations on use according to law. The City has several Special Revenue Funds. The major Special Revenue funds are highlighted below. Fund 100 - Gas Tax: Gas Tax revenue is projected to be $3,143,671, which reflects an increase of 0.4% as volume of gasoline sales is projected to remain steady. These funds are transferred to the General Fund to support street and road maintenance. Fund 102 — Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA): Per the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1-Beall), increased gas tax and vehicle registration fees were imposed to fund street and road projects and other transportation uses Statewide. RMRA revenue is projected to be $3,037,266, which is an increase of 4.4%. These funds are allocated to the Pavement Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project. Fund 103—Street Maintenance: This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2018-19 to accumulate resources for the future replacement of streets and roads throughout the City. Measure S contributes annually to this fund, which has a projected Fiscal Year 2025-26 ending balance of $4,763,355. FY2025-26 appropriations of $1,927,477 is to partially fund the Overland Drive Widening capital project. Fund 105 — NPDES In Lieu Fees: This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2019-20 to account for the collection of In Lieu fees associated with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Revenue is received as private development subject to NPDES requirements occur. Fiscal Year 2025-26 expenditures of $114,150 is programmed to install storm drain inlet filters throughout the City. Fund 106 — Uptown Temecula New Streets In -Lieu Fees: This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2019- 20 in conjunction with the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee. Developers within the Specific Plan who cannot build new streets will be charged the In Lieu Fee. No activity is anticipated in this fund for 2025-26, and the ending fund balance totals $983,842. Fund 120— Development Impact Fees (DIF): DIF revenue is projected to be $8,073,996, which reflects an increase of 194.6% due to the higher level of activity in the prior year occurring in the Altair, Elderberry Park and Sommer's Bend developments. DIF revenue varies from year-to-year as it is based on anticipated development projects. DIF Revenues are transferred to the CIP to fund capital projects. Fiscal Year 2025- 26 ending fund balance is projected to be $20,237,550. Fund 125 — Public, Education & Government (PEG): PEG Fund revenues are received from local cable operators for the sole purpose of supporting the access facilities within the City. PEG Revenues are projected to be $215,436, which will be spent on various technology equipment used to support the broadcast of City Council meetings and events. Fiscal Year 2025-26 ending fund balance is projected to be $1,261,637. Fund 140 — Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): CDBG grant revenues are received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Fiscal Year 2025-26 revenue is projected to be $612,781 and will support operations, community grants and capital projects. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Fund 145 —Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset (TEAM) Fund: This fund was established to capture energy efficiency rebates to be used to fund future energy efficiency projects. In Fiscal Year 2020-21, the City received a rebate of $640,754 for the acquisition of street lights and conversion to LED bulbs. There is no activity programmed for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and the ending fund balance is projected to be $126,157. Fund 150—AB2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention Fund: This fund was established to account for subvention funds used to implement programs/projects to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. Fiscal Year 2025- 26 revenue is projected to be $166,694. The majority of these funds are programmed for capital projects, including the Citywide Bike Lane and Trail Program, and to support the Clean Cities Coalition. Fund 160—Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund: This fund was established to account for state grant funds to assist cities in delivering front-line law enforcement services. Fiscal Year 2025-26 revenue is projected to be $283,502 and will be transferred to the General Fund to support law enforcement. Fund 165—Affordable Housing Fund: The Affordable Housing Fund reflects the housing -related activities of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency. Total Revenue for Fiscal Year 2025-26 of $488,091 includes the State Department of Finance allocation of $250,000 designated for the administration of the wind down of redevelopment obligations, plus $238,091 in investment interest. Expenditures reflect the ongoing administration of the City's Affordable Housing program. Fund 170 — Measure A: Measure A revenue is projected to be $4,242,301which reflects a 7.1% decrease over the prior year, due to a slower economy. This revenue is restricted for use on local streets and roads and is programmed to support street and road maintenance. Fiscal Year 2025-26 ending fund balance is projected to be $976,020. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Internal Service Funds are used to account for the funding of goods and services provided by one department to other benefitting departments on a cost -reimbursement basis. Additionally, the City maintains several Replacement Funds designed to accumulate resources for the future replacement of City equipment, technology, and facilities. Fund 300 — Insurance: Projected expenses total $3,800,317, which covers the cost of administering the City's liability and property insurance programs. The projected fund balance is $2,077,725 exceeds the desired reserve level of $1.5 million, which is three times the City's self -insured retention of $500,000 per incident. Fund 305 — Workers' Compensation: Projected expenses total $657,169, which covers the cost of administering the City's self -insured Workers' Compensation program. The projected fund balance is $1,478,521 and nearly meets the desired balance of $1.5 million, which represents three times the City's self -insured retention of $500,000 per incident. Fund 310 — Vehicles and Equipment: Projected expenses total $799,527 to replace several fleet vehicles and heavy equipment that have reached the end of their useful lives. The projected fund balance is $5,575,061. Replacements planned for 2025-26 include a Boom Truck, Construction Dump Truck and a 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Ford F-150 Lightning. Additionally, depreciation expense has been budgeted this year, adding $429,527 in expenditures for this Fund. Fund 320 — Information Technology: Projected expenses total $7,227,781, which provides for the management of the City's computers, audio-visual equipment, cyber security, and telephone systems. The projected fund balance is $850,797. Fund 325 — Technology Replacement: Projected expenses total $516,158 to replace the City's phone system, network switch, audio equipment at the Community Recreation Center Amphitheater and to fund the annual computer replacement program. The projected fund balance is $4,030,642. Fund 330 — Support Services: Projected expenses total $387,827, which provides for the management of the City's central reception, printing and mail activities. The projected fund balance is $22,976. Fund 335 — Support Services Replacement: Projected expenses total $72,200 to replace the Central Services copy machines and includes $42,200 in depreciation expenses. The projected fund balance is $383,895. Fund 340 — Facilities: Projected expenses total $1,645,947, which provide for the operations and maintenance of the City's buildings and parking structure. The projected fund balance is $92,364. Fund 350 — Facility Replacement: Projected expenses total $1,087,338 for Capital Outlay to support the City Facilities Rehabilitation capital project and includes $87,338 in depreciation expenses. The projected fund balance is $3,548,715. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SARDA) Fund 380 — SARDA: Projected expenses total $7,090,641 primarily to pay debt service expenditures on the outstanding 2017A and 2017B Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Bonds, plus the addition of $1,179,997 budgeted for expected depreciation expense, not included in the prior year. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) The Temecula Community Services District was established as an assessment district to provide a comprehensive neighborhood and community park system, as well as a complement of recreational and cultural programs and events. TCSD also provides street lighting, median and slope maintenance, refuse hauling and a recycling program, and library services (known as Service Level Funds). Combined revenue for TCSD totals $36,143,057, which reflects an increase of 1.8% over the prior year. The majority of the increase is from TCSD Operations and the Temecula Public Library. Combined expenditures for TCSD total $36,770,101 and reflect an increase of 1.6% due primarily to the addition of one new Signal Technician I position to support Service Level B (Street Lights), and higher waste hauling costs reflected in the Service Level D (Refuse/Recycling) Fund. Ending fund balance for TCSD is projected to be $4,849,853 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget TCSD Operations, excluding the Service Levels and Library Funds, is projected over a five-year period, as summarized below. 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actuals Revised Proposed Projection Projection Projection Projection Measure C Revenue 1,908,085 1,926,088 1,935,718 1,955,076 1,974,626 1,994,373 2,014,316 Measure S Revenue 13,254,402 15,864,726 16,480,467 17,388,215 18,151,038 18,945,152 19,771,855 Program Revenue 2,779,695 2,836,576 2,860,431 2,889,036 2,917,926 2,947,105 2,976,576 Total Revenue 17,942,182 20,627,390 21,276,617 22,232,326 23,043,590 23,886,630 24,762,748 Operations Expenditures 16,459,137 19,166,127 19,303,385 20,164,533 20,914,238 21,693,679 22,504,086 Maintenance Expenditures 1,775,748 1,950,588 2,008,203 2,067,793 2,129,353 2,192,951 2,258,662 Total Expenditures 18,234,885 21,116,715 21,311,588 22,232,326 23,043,591 23,886,630 24,762,748 Beginning Balance 916,999 624,296 134,971 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ending Balance 624,296 134,971 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100?001 Revenue from Measure S 74% 77% 77% 78% 79% 79% 80% The Five -Year Forecast shows the various revenue sources and projected operating expenditures, which are increasing between 2.0 — 4.3% per year. The contribution from Measure S increases from 74% in 2023-24 to 80% by 2029-30. A long-term fiscal strategic plan is recommended to address the increased reliance on Measure S to balance this Fund into the future. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is presented to the City Council under separate cover. This program provides a five-year plan for capital improvements that is updated annually to ensure compliance with the program. The impact of capital projects on maintenance and operating costs were taken into consideration in the development of the operating budget. The CIP includes a total of $894,070,582 in identified capital projects, with a total of $624,379,144 in project funding, representing 70% of all Project Costs. There is $269,691,438 in "Unspecified" project funding, indicating that a revenue source has not yet been secured for these projects, which have been identified as necessary infrastructure for the City, and will require that funding be secured before the project construction can commence. Capital projects are categorized into five Project Types, as noted in the adjacent table. Project Type Number of Projects Total Project Cost Circulation 24 632,429,570 Housing 4 20,401,000 1 nfrastru ctu re 49 117,740,242 Parks/ Re c 18 59,908,080 CFD-Funded Total" 2 63,591,689 1 1 ,582 Various sources contribute to the funding of the Capital Improvement Program, including many City Funds, State and Federal Grants, Community Facility District Funds, Successor Agency Funds, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Funds. The City seeks all available funding sources for 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 IV The HL-Art o€ 4autlw l= ,Gat1 projects, including federal, state, and local grants, outside contributions and City funds. Total funding for the Fiscal Years 2026-30 CIP program reflects 61% from outside funding sources, with the remaining 39% provided by various City funds, including Measure S, Measure A, Development Impact Fee Funds, General Fund, Capital Financing, and several other sources. Only one new project has been added to the CIP, the Local Roadway Safety Plan Update ($155,000) which is designed to bring the Plan in line with federal safety requirements. City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Capital Prolect Funding Sources TUMF, 54,161,598, 9% City Funds, State/Local Grants, 244,469,320, 79,448,743, 13% 39% Successor Agency, 750,000,0% _. Reimbursements, - 40,952,252,6% Federal Grants, 96,030,114, IS% Development Community Impact Fees, Facility Districts, ` 53,591,561,9% 54,975,557,9% As part of the development of the Capital Improvement Program budget, each project is evaluated to identify any ongoing impacts to the Operating Budget. The amounts identified in the table below are incorporated into the Annual Operating Budget and the Five -Year Financial Projections. Summary of Operating & Maintenance Impacts Maintenance and Operations of PW17-01/711 - CITY SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM Security Camera System 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 FN19-01/724 - CITYWIDE FINANCIAL SYSTEM UPGRADE Annual Software Maintenance 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 ACQUISITION & LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RETROFIT Electricity Savings (695,286) (709,475) (723,665) (738,138) (752,901) PW21-09/683 - ELECTRIC VEHICLES CHARGING STATION Electric Charging Vehicles Fees (3,100) (3,100) (3,100) (3,100) (3,100) PW 17-19/690 - 1-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING Required by Caltrans 60.805 62.046 63,289 65.188 67.144 PW17-21/692 - MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER Staffing for MRC (4 positions) 526,609 548,551 570,493 591,600 614,370 Project Staffing for MRC (45 positions - 13.07 FTEs) 705,946 735,361 764,775 795,366 825,978 Additional Utility Costs 71,371 72,828 74,285 77,034 79,999 Janitorial/Security 129,251 131,888 134,526 139,504 144,873 1,433,177 1,488,628 1,544,079 1,603,504 1,665,220 IT20-01/780 - OLD TOWN SECURITY CAMERA & Maintenance fee for Old Town SOUND SYSTEM Sound System 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 PWPE07-03/PW23-18 - LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOMS Janitorial Services 29,866 30,475 31,085 31,706 32,340 PWPE-07/155 - PARK RESTROOMS RENOVATIONS, EXPANSION AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS Janitorial Services 27,591 28,154 28,717 29,292 29,878 r rRESTROOMS r, 0 r. 32,31A Total Incremental Operating & Maintenance Impacts 1,343,919 1,388,203 1,432,490 1,481,158 1,531,921 2025-26 AUTHORIZED STAFFIN Total authorized Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions total 202.2 authorized positions, including five Council Members. The increase reflects 1 new position (Signal Technician 1) compared to the prior year. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget Public Safety personnel is provided through contracts with Riverside County and CalFire. A total of 117 sworn Sheriff's Deputies and 18 Community Service Officers are included in the Sheriff's budget, and a total of 79 personnel are reflected in the Fire Department budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. City of Temecula History of Authorized Positions 25000 210.75 aoz.za 200.oa 150.00 100.00 50.00 m o ti N m y Ln cg R co rn o rl r.l rn Ln %D m o eel N m d 'n 'D 6} O G O O O O G O O 1'i 1i 1- 1i e-I •i -V rl N N N N CV Nl 1V 1= N M V 1= In Q� a N N M C N ri 00 61 O N N n9 C uS 04 a, O O O O O O O O O O eel rl rl o eel c[ �„� i..� rl rl N N N N N N a, c+ rynry ynyyy o c rynry bo(yy fin�..(( n rya ic�yy yny.�� c ryory rya ryory n o n rycry any ryory ryn n n rynry Y 7 Y Y Y � Y Y Y Y } `r `r Y LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL In addition to the Authorized Positions, the City employs three Limited -Term -Assignment positions related to the implementation of anew Human Resources/Payroll software system. A significant number of part- time, non-benefitted Project employees are also employed to assist with the multitude of programs offered by the Temecula Community Services District. For Fiscal Year 2025-26, an estimated 90 full-time equivalents will be hired as seasonal and part-time support. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the City of Temecula is in a solid fiscal position with the General Fund balanced and all reserves fully funded not only in Fiscal Year 2025-26 but throughout the ensuing five-year period. The Capital Improvement Program is robust, with 70% of all Project Costs funded, and will deliver a wide array of improvements to infrastructure, facilities, affordable housing, enhanced parks, new trails and many other amenities the citizens of Temecula enjoy. I would like to express my appreciation to the City Council for providing the direction and support crucial to achieving the City's goals. I would also like to recognize the contributions of City staff for not only creating a responsive operating budget, but also for their commitment to providing top quality services to all who live, work, and play in Temecula. I would like to give special thanks to the City's Budget Team: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance; Ward Komers, Assistant Director of Finance; Paula Majors, Finance Manager; and Catlin Dorset, Budget Manager for their long hours and dedication to the City and this budget process. Sincerely, a, 01CL_ Aaron Adams City Manager 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (951) 694-6444 ♦ Facsimile (951) 694-6479 RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2026-30 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted, or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. This City Council, as the lead agency for environmental review, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines promulgated there under (collectively "CEQA), has reviewed the scope and nature of this Capital Improvement Program and has concluded that the planning and prioritization process comprising this activity is not a project pursuant to CEQA because it does not order or authorize the commencement of any physical or other activity that would directly or indirectly have a significant effect upon the environment. The Capital Improvement Program merely establishes a listing of priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary planning studies, including review pursuant to CEQA, at a future unspecified date. The future planning studies will be conducted at the earliest possible time so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to CEQA. Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City of Temecula and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as regards to CEQA, this City Council has also considered this Capital Improvement Program as if it were a Project pursuant to CEQA. Reviewing this Program as a Project, this City Council concludes the Project would be exempt from review under CEQA, both pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and to the categorical exemption set forth in Section 15262 of CEQA. Section 15061(b)(3) would apply because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Program are undertaken. Section 15262 provides a categorical exemption to actions that are feasibility or planning studies related to possible future actions. This Council is aware of and has considered the current and relevant environmental factors as an integral component of the review of this Program. This Council, as lead agency, hereby determines and decides that the exemption provided in both Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15262 apply in the event this is deemed a Project pursuant to CEQA. Section 2. On May 21, 2025, the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65401 of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 3. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the requirements of Government Code Section 65402(a) shall not apply to: (1) the disposition of the remainder of a larger parcel which was acquired and used in part for street purposes; (2) acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening; or (3) alignment projects, provided such dispositions for street purposes, acquisition, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening, or alignment projects are of a minor nature. Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that the acquisition of land necessary for the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-30 is consistent with the General Plan. Section 5. That a certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula, entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026- 30" includes herein appropriations for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and are hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 which have not been completed, encumbered, nor included in the Fiscal Years 2026-30 CIP, are hereby carried over for each applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2025-26. Certain Development Impact Fees from future revenue may be used to replace the expenditure of current capital reserve funds in the CIP. Section 6. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires City Council action. C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), if sufficient appropriated funds are available. D. The City Manager may authorize transfers up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) between approved Capital Improvement Program projects. E. Notwithstanding Section 6.13. above, pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to one -hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of one -hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 7. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Preliminary Operating Budget is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager. C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. In accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.6.030, the General Manager shall administer the City personnel system. This General Manager is authorized to fix and alter the titles, compensation, and number of positions in the Schedule of Authorized Positions as needed, subject to the total personnel expenditure budget limitations approved by the Board of Directors. E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires Board of Directors action. F. The General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to one - hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $100,000 require Board of Directors action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in amounts up to the project contingency established by the Board. G. Pursuant to Section 3.28.130 of the Municipal Code, the General Manager may authorize purchases of supplies and equipment in amounts up to one -hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any purchases of supplies and equipment in excess of $100,000 shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder pursuant to formal bid procedures and require City Council action, except that the General Manager may approve change orders on purchases of supplies and equipment approved by the Board in amounts up to the contingency established by Board. H. Pursuant to Section 3.28.250 of the Municipal Code, purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value of one -hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or less, may be made by the purchasing agent in the open market pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.260 through 3.28.280 and without observing the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.130 through 3.28.240; provided, however, that all bidding may be dispensed with for purchases of supplies and equipment having a total estimated value of $5,000 or less. I. Appropriations and Revenue Estimates for grant funded programs for Fiscal Year 2024-25 which have not been expended or encumbered, are hereby carried over for the applicable grant program to the Fiscal Year 2025-26. Section 3. The Finance Director is authorized to make temporary short term interfund loans between appropriate funds in order to cover short term cash needs caused by cash flow timing differences. These interfund loans must have an identified repayment source. Section 4. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 2025, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Section 5. There are numerous occasions when small dollar valued purchases must be made for or on behalf of the District; and it is appropriate that a petty cash fund be used to provide for the purchase of these smaller dollar valued items; now, therefore, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: A. There is hereby established a renewable petty cash fund to be maintained in the Finance Department. B. The imprest balance amount of the petty cash fund shall be three thousand dollars ($3,000). C. Vouchers, receipts, or other evidence of payment shall be required before reimbursement shall be made from said petty cash fund, in such form as shall be required by Finance Director. Section 6. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary 4 RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2026-30, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted, or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered relevant environmental factors. This City Council, as the lead agency for environmental review, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines promulgated there under (collectively "CEQA), has reviewed the scope and nature of this Capital Improvement Program and has concluded that the planning and prioritization process comprising this activity is not a project pursuant to CEQA because it does not order or authorize the commencement of any physical or other activity that would directly or indirectly have a significant effect upon the environment. The Capital Improvement Program merely establishes a listing of priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary planning studies, including review pursuant to CEQA, at a future unspecified date. The future planning studies will be conducted at the earliest possible time so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to CEQA. Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City of Temecula and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as regards to CEQA, this City Council has also considered this Capital Improvement Program as if it were a Project pursuant to CEQA. Reviewing this Program as an Project, this City Council concludes the Project would be exempt from review under CEQA, both pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and to the categorical exemption set forth in Section 15262 of CEQA. Section 15061(b)(3) would apply because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Program are undertaken. Section 15262 provides a categorical exemption to actions that are feasibility or planning studies related to possible future actions. This Council is aware of and has considered the current and relevant environmental factors as an integral component of the review of this Program. This Council, as lead agency, hereby determines and decides that the exemption provided in both Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15262 apply in the event this is deemed a Project pursuant to CEQA. Section 2. On May 21, 2025, the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65401 of State Planning and Zoning Law. Section 3. The Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency hereby finds and declares that the requirements of Government Code Section 65402(a) shall not apply to: (1) the disposition of the remainder of a larger parcel which was acquired and used in part for street purposes; (2) acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening; or (3) alignment projects, provided such dispositions for street purposes, acquisition, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening, or alignment projects are of a minor nature. Section 4. The Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency hereby finds that the acquisition of land necessary for the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2026-30 is consistent with the General Plan. Section 5. That a certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula, entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026- 30" include herein appropriations for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 which have not been completed, encumbered, nor included in the Fiscal Years 2026-30 CIP, are hereby carried over for each applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2025-26. Section 6. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditures of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $100,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires Board of Directors action. C. The Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts up to $100,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available. D. The Executive Director may authorize transfers up to $100,000 between approved Capital Improvement Program projects. E. Notwithstanding Section 7.13. above, pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the Executive Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $100,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $100,000 require City Council action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council. Section 7. That the Fiscal Year 2025-26 SARDA Operating Budget is hereby adopted. Section 8. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency has adopted a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2025-26 SARDA Operating Budget and the State Department of Finance has approved the expenditure on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director. C. In accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.6.030, the Executive Director shall administer the City personnel system. The Executive Director is authorized to fix and alter the titles, compensation, and number of positions in the Schedule of Authorized Positions as needed, subject to the total personnel expenditure budget limitations approved by the Agency Board. D. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $100,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires Agency Board action. E. The Executive Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $100,000. Any expenditure of Public Works funds in excess of $100,000 require Agency Member action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Agency Board in amounts up to the project contingency established by the Agency Board. F. Pursuant to Section 3.28.130 of the Municipal Code, the Executive Director may authorize purchases of supplies and equipment in amounts up to $100,000. Any purchases of supplies and equipment in excess of $100,000 shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder pursuant to formal bid procedures and require Agency Board action, except that the Executive Director may approve change orders on purchases of supplies and equipment approved by the Agency Board in amounts up to the contingency established by Agency Board. G. Pursuant to Section 3.28.250 of the Municipal Code, purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value of $100,000 or less, may be made by the purchasing agent in the open market pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.260 through 3.28.280 and without observing the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.130 through 3.28.240; provided, however, that all bidding may be dispensed with for purchases of supplies and equipment having a total estimated value of $5,000 or less. Section 9. The Director of Finance is authorized to make temporary short term interfund loans between appropriate funds in order to cover short term cash needs caused by cash flow timing differences. These interfund loans must have an identified repayment source. 3 Section 10. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 2025, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Section 11. There are numerous occasions when small dollar valued purchases must be made for or on behalf of the Agency; and it is appropriate that a petty cash fund be used to provide for the purchase of these smaller dollar valued items; now, therefore, the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: A. There is hereby established a renewable petty cash fund to be maintained in the Accounting and Purchasing Department. B. The imprest balance amount of the petty cash fund shall be $3,000. C. Vouchers, receipts, or other evidence of payment shall be required before reimbursement shall be made from said petty cash fund, in such form as shall be required by Finance Director. Section 12. The Agency Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. SARDA 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025 by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: \• :17.1►0 U U: ►_ ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Annual Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2025-26" is hereby adopted. Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget appropriations: A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered appropriation available to cover the expenditure. B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager. C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts. D. In accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.6.030, the City Manager shall administer the City personnel system. The City Manager is authorized to fix and alter the titles, compensation, and number of positions in the Schedule of Authorized Positions as needed, subject to the total personnel expenditure budget limitations approved by the City Council. E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to one - hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires City Council action. F. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into the following types of agreements on behalf of the City, Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency where the amount of the agreement is one - hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or less, there exists an unencumbered appropriation in the fund account against which the cost of the agreement is to be charged, and all applicable procedures for approval of the agreement have been fulfilled: public works construction agreements; agreements for purchase of supplies or equipment; personal, professional, consultant and maintenance services agreements; theater, entertainment and talent agreements; reimbursement agreements related to public improvements; and real property leases, licenses and facility use agreements in which the term is three (3) year or less. Sponsorship agreements and fee waiver agreements shall be approved by the City Council. The City Manager is also authorized to enter into agreements for cultural resources treatment and tribal monitoring with a federally recognized Indian tribe. G. The City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized to settle personal injury and property damage lawsuits and enter into settlement agreements on behalf of the City, Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency where the amount of the settlement does not exceed one - hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). H. Pursuant to Section 3.28.250 of the Municipal Code, purchases of supplies and equipment of an estimated value of one -hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or less, may be made by the purchasing agent in the open market pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.260 through 3.28.280 and without observing the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.28.130 through 3.28.240; provided, however, that all bidding may be dispensed with for purchases of supplies and equipment having a total estimated value of five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less. I. Appropriations and Revenue estimates for grant funded programs for Fiscal Year 2024-25 which have not been expended, encumbered or received, are hereby carried over for the applicable grant program to the subsequent fiscal year. J. Appropriations for the transfer of funds to the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2024-25 which have not been expended are hereby carried over to the subsequent fiscal year. Section 3. The Director of Finance, in consultation with the City Manager, is delegated the authority to determine and define the amounts of those components of fund balance that are classified as "Assigned Fund Balance". Section 4. The Director of Finance is authorized to make temporary short term interfund loans between appropriate funds in order to cover short term cash needs caused by cash flow timing differences. These interfund loans must have an identified repayment source. Section 5. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 2025, are hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Section 6. There are numerous occasions when small dollar valued purchases must be made for or on behalf of the City; and it is appropriate that a petty cash fund be used to provide for the purchase of these smaller dollar valued items; now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: N A. There is hereby established a renewable petty cash fund to be maintained in the Finance Department. B. The imprest balance amount of the petty cash fund shall be three thousand dollars ($3,000). C. Vouchers, receipts, or other evidence of payment shall be required before reimbursement shall be made from said petty cash fund, in such form as shall be required by Director of Finance. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27t" day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Brenden Kalfus, Mayor 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Schedule of Authorized Positions and Salary Schedule, attached hereto, is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 2025 and the Salary Schedule shall become effective June 28, 2025, and may be, thereafter, amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and Salary Schedule and has the authority to select and appoint employees and approve Executive Staff employment agreements in accordance with the City of Temecula's Municipal Code and personnel policies. Section 4. In accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.6.030, the City Manager shall administer the City personnel system. This resolution specifically authorizes the City Manager to fix and alter the titles, compensation, and number of positions in the Schedule of Authorized Positions as needed, subject to the total personnel expenditure budget limitations approved by the City Council. Section 5. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of July 1, 2025 CITY COUNCIL Councilmember FY2025-26 Number of Positions 5.0 Salary Schedule Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 1,900 2,100 Bargaining Unit*** N/A Exempt/Non- Exempt E City Council Subtotal: 5.0 CITY MANAGER Assistant City Manager 1.0 19,138 27,043 Exec E Assistant to the City Manager 1.0 11,762 16,621 MCP E City Manager Deputy City Manager Executive Assistant Senior Office Specialist City Manager Subtotal: 1.0 N/A 29,747 Contract E 1.0 17,401 24,586 Exec E 1.0 6,190 8,745 MCP E 1.0 4,956 6,344 Rep NE OFFICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Administrative Assistant Economic Development Manager Multimedia Coordinator Senior Management Analyst 1.0 5,337 6,833 Rep NE 1.0 10,655 15,056 MCP E 1.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE 2.0 8,121 11,475 MCP E Office of Public Information & Economic Development Subtotal: CITY CLERK Deputy City Clerk Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk Management Assistant Records Manager 1.0 7,923 11,194 MCP E 1.0 15,432 21,805 Exec E 1.0 5,748 7,356 Rep NE 1.0 7,178 10,143 MCP E Records Technician City Clerk Subtotal: 1.0 4,169 5,337 Rep NE HUMAN RESOURCES Assistant Director of HR/Risk Management Director of HR/Risk Management Human Resources Supervisor (Confidential) 1.0 12,055 17,033 MCP E 1.0 15,432 21,805 Exec E 1.0 7,003 9,894 MCP NE Management Assistant(Confidential) 2.0 5,748 8,121 MCP NE Senior Management Analyst 1.0 8,121 11,475 MCP E Senior Management Analyst (underfill as Management Analyst) 1.0 8,121 11,475 MCP E Human Resources Subtotal: FINANCE Accountant 1/11 2.0 7,178 9,653 Rep NE Accounting Assistant (Cashier & AP) 3.0 5,079 6,502 Rep NE Accounting Technician 1/11 1.0 5,607 7,542 Rep NE Assistant Director of Finance 1.0 12,983 18,344 MCP E Director of Finance 1.0 15,818 22,351 Exec E Finance Manager 1.0 9,188 12,983 MCP E Fiscal Services Manager 2.0 10,655 15,056 MCP E Management Analyst 2.0 7,003 9,894 MCP E Senior Accountant (Confidential) 1.0 8,325 11,762 MCP NE Senior Accounting Technician 1.0 6,502 8,325 Rep NE Senior Accounting Technician - Payroll (Confidential) 1 1.0 6,502 9,188 Finance Subtotal: iik� SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of July 1, 2025 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Assistant Director Information Technology/Support Svcs FY2025-26 Number of Positions 1.0 Salary Schedule Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 12,665 17,897 Bargaining Unit*** MCP Exempt/Non- Exempt E Director of Information Technology/Support Svcs 1.0 15,432 21,805 Exec E Information Technology Manager 1.0 11,475 16,212 MCP E Information Technology Specialist 1/11 (Confidential) 2.0 6,190 9,188 MCP NE Information Technology Supervisor (Confidential) 4.0 7,923 11,194 MCP NE Information Technology Supervisor (Multimedia Services) (Confidential) 1.0 7,923 11,194 MCP NE Information Technology Technician 1/11 0.5 5,337 7,923 MCP NE Management Analyst 1.0 7,003 9,894 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,892 7,542 Rep NE Senior Information Technology Specialist (Confidential) 2.0 7,178 10,143 MCP NE Support Services Information Technology Technician 1/11 0.5 5,337 7,923 MCP NE Office Specialist 1/11 - AM 0.6 4,273 5,748 Rep NE Office Specialist 1/11 - PM 0.6 4,273 5,748 Rep NE Support Services Supervisor Information Technology Subtotal: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Assistant Director of Community Development 1.0 1.0 4,956 6,344 12,983 18,344 Rep MCP NE E Director of Community Development 1.0 15,818 22,351 Exec E Principal Management Analyst 1.0 8,965 12,665 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,892 7,542 Rep NE Planning Assistant Planner 1.0 6,502 8,325 Rep NE Associate Planner I (underfill as Planning Technician) 1.0 7,542 9,653 Rep NE Associate Planner 1/11 2.0 7,542 10,655 Rep NE Community Development Technician 1 1.0 5,748 7,356 Rep NE Community Development Technician 11 (underfill as Comm Dev Tech 1) 2.0 6,344 8,121 Rep NE Planning Manager 1.0 11,194 15,818 MCP E Principal Management Analyst 1.0 8,965 12,665 MCP E Principal Planner 1.0 10,143 14,329 MCP E Senior Community Development Technician 2.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst 0.1 8,121 11,475 MCP E Senior Office Specialist 1.0 4,956 6,344 Rep NE Senior Planner 1.0 9,188 12,983 MCP E Building and Safety/Code Enforcement Building Inspector 1 1.0 6,665 8,533 Rep NE Building Inspector 11 2.0 7,356 9,417 Rep NE Building Official 1.0 11,762 16,621 MCP E Code Enforcement Manager 1.0 8,325 11,762 MCP E Code Enforcement Officer 1 1.0 5,607 7,178 Rep NE Code Enforcement Officer 11 1.0 6,190 7,923 Rep NE Field Supervisor- Code Enforcement 1.0 7,542 9,653 Rep NE Plan Checker 1.0 8,965 11,475 Rep NE Senior Administrative Assistant 2.0 5,892 7,542 Rep NE Senior Building Inspector 2.0 8,121 10,397 Rep NE Senior Code Enforcement Officer (underfill as Code Enforcement Officer 11) 1.0 6,833 8,745 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst ffCommunity Development Subtotal: 0.9 8,121 11,475 MCP E SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of July 1, 2025 PUBLIC WORKS Assistant Director of Public Works FY2025-26 Number of Positions 1.0 Salary Schedule Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 13,981 19,755 Bargaining Unit*** MCP Exempt/Non- Exempt E Director of Public Works 1.0 15,818 22,351 Exec E Program Manager 1.0 8,965 12,665 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,892 7,542 Rep NE CIP Administration Assistant Engineer 1/11 1.0 7,178 9,653 Rep NE Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,653 12,357 Rep E Associate Civil Engineer (underfill as Assistant Engineer 11) 1.0 9,653 12,357 Rep E Associate Engineer 1 1.0 8,325 10,655 Rep E Associate Engineer 11 2.0 9,188 11,762 Rep E Principal Civil Engineer 2.0 12,055 17,033 MCP E Senior Civil Engineer 1.0 10,923 15,432 MCP E Senior Public Works Inspector 2.0 7,923 10,143 Rep NE Senior Public Works Inspector (underfill as Public Works Inspector 11) 1.0 7,923 10,143 Rep NE Supervising Public Works Inspector 1.0 8,745 11,194 Rep NE Land Development/NPDES Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,653 12,357 Rep E Associate Civil Engineer (underfill as Associate Engineer 1) 1.0 9,653 12,357 Rep E Associate Engineer 11 2.0 9,188 11,762 Rep E Engineering Tech 1/11 1.0 6,190 8,325 Rep NE Management Assistant (underfill as Senior Office Specialist) 1.0 5,748 7,356 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst (underfill as Management Analyst) 1.0 8,121 11,475 MCP E Senior Public Works Inspector 1.0 7,923 10,143 Rep NE Traffic Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,653 12,357 Rep E Principal Civil Engineer 1.0 12,055 17,033 MCP E Senior Signal Technician 2.0 7,923 10,143 Rep NE Signal Technician 1 1.0 6,833 8,745 Rep NE Maintenance (Streets, Facilities, Parks) Custodian 11 - Facilities 2.0 3,871 4,956 Rep NE Field Supervisor -Trades 1.0 7,729 9,894 Rep NE Landscape Inspector II 1.0 6,502 8,325 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Electrician 1.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - HVAC 1.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets (underfill as Maintenance Worker 11) 3.0 5,607 7,178 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Parks 2.0 5,607 7,178 Rep NE Maintenance Manager 1.0 11,762 16,621 MCP E Maintenance Superintendent 3.0 10,655 15,056 MCP E Maintenance Worker I - Facilities 1.0 5,472 7,003 Rep NE Maintenance Worker I - Parks 1.0 4,602 5,892 Rep NE Maintenance Worker I - Streets 5.0 4,602 5,892 Rep NE Maintenance Worker 11- Facilities 3.0 6,039 7,729 Rep NE Maintenance Worker II - Parks 1.0 5,079 6,502 Rep NE Maintenance Worker II - Streets 2.0 5,079 6,502 Rep NE Management Analyst 1.0 7,003 9,894 MCP E Park Attendant 11 3.0 6,190 7,923 Rep NE Senior Landscape Inspector 1.0 7,178 9,188 Rep NE Senior Office Specialist (underfill as Office Specialist 11) Public Works Subtotal: 1.0 4,956 6,344 Rep NE 1i SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of July 1, 2025 FIRE FY2025-26 Number of Positions Salary Schedule Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum Bargaining Unit*** Exempt/Non- Exempt Community Development Technician II 1.0 6,344 8,121 Rep NE Fire Inspector II 1.0 8,533 10,923 Rep NE Management Analyst 1.0 7,003 9,894 MCP E Office Specialist 1/11 1.0 4,273 5,748 Rep NE Senior Community Development Technician (underfill as ComDevTech I) 1.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE Emergency Management Emergency Manager Fire Subtotal: COMMUNITY SERVICES Assistant Director of Community Services 1.0 1.0 8,533 12,055 12,665 17,897 MCP MCP E E Community Services Coordinator 1/11 6.0 5,748 7,729 Rep NE Community Services Manager 8.0 10,397 14,688 MCP E Community Services Specialist 1/11 1.0 4,956 6,665 Rep NE Community Services Superintendent 1.0 11,475 16,212 MCP E Community Services Supervisor 1/11 13.0 6,665 8,965 Rep NE Director of Community Services 1.0 15,432 21,805 Exec E Management Assistant 1.0 5,748 7,356 Rep NE Multimedia Coordinator 2.0 7,003 8,965 Rep NE Principal Management Analyst 1.0 8,965 12,665 MCP E Theater Technical Coordinator 1/11 1.0 5,748 7,729 Rep NE Theater Technical Coordinator I/11 (underfill as Theater Technical Specialist 11) Community Services Subtotal: 1 1.0 1 37.0 5,748 7,729 Rep NE 75 ** Bargaining Units: Rep = Represented MCP = Management/Confidential Exec = Executive Authorized/Unfunded positions: Community Development - Plannins Principal Planner I 1.0 10,143 14,329 MCP E SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of July 1, 2025 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Technician 1 1.0 1 5,892 7,542 1 Rep NE COMMUNITY SERVICES Management Assistant FINANCE Senior Accounting Technician (Confidential) HUMAN RESOURCES Administrative Assistant (Confidential) Human Resources Technician 1/11 Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1 5,748 7,356 1 Rep I NE 1.0 1 6,502 9,188 1 MCP I NE 1.0 5,337 7,542 MCP NE 1.0 5,472 8,121 MCP NE 1.0 8,121 11,475 MCP E Office Specialist 1/II - PM 1 1.0 1 4,273 5,748 1 Rep NE CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base ADMINISTRATIVE Executive Assistant 4 951-004 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 4 952-004 Hourly 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Administrative Assistant 3 953-003 Hourly 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 Monthly 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 Annually 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 Senior Office Specialist 2 954-002 Hourly 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 Monthly 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 Annually 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 Office Specialist II 1 955-001 Hourly 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 Monthly 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 Annually 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 Office Specialist 1 1 956-001 Hourly 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 Monthly 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 Annually 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 Office Aide 1 959-001 Hourly 19.26 19.74 20.23 20.75 21.26 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 Monthly 3,338.40 3,421.60 3,506.53 3,596.67 3,685.07 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 Annually 40,060.80 41,059.20 42,078.40 43,160.00 44,220.80 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 ANALYST Principal Management Analyst 7 901-007 Hourly 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 Monthly 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 Annually 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 Senior Management Analyst 6 902-006 Hourly 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 Monthly 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 Annually 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 Management Analyst 5 903-005 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 Management Assistant 4 904-004 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 Management Aide III 3 905-003 Hourly 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 Management Aide 11 2 906-002 Hourly 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 Monthly 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 Annually 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 Management Aide 1 1 907-001 Hourly 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 Monthly 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 Annually 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 Intern 1 908-001 Hourly 18.33 18.79 19.26 19.74 20.23 20.75 21.26 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 Monthly 3,177.20 3,256.93 3,338.40 3,421.60 3,506.53 3,596.67 3,685.07 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 Annually 38,126.40 39,083.20 40,060.80 41,059.20 42,078.40 43,160.00 44,220.80 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 PAGE 1 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 I Salary Steps _ MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development 8 300-008 Hourly 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 128.95 Monthly 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 22,351.33 Annually 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 268,216.00 Asst Dir. of Community Development 7 330-007 Hourly 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 Monthly 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 Annually 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- BUILDING & SAFETY Building Official 7 331-007 Hourly 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 Monthly 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 Annually 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 Field Supervisor - Building 4 330-004 Hourly 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 Monthly 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 Annually 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 Plan Checker 4 308-004 Hourly 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 Monthly 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 Annually 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 Senior Building Inspector 3 332-003 Hourly 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 Monthly 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 Annually 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 Building Inspector II 2 333-002 Hourly 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 Monthly 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 Annually 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 Building Inspector 1 1 334-001 Hourly 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 Monthly 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 Annually 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CODE ENFORCEMENT Code Enforcement Manager 5 339-005 Hourly 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 Monthly 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 Annually 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 Field Supervisor - Code Enforcement 4 343-004 Hourly 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 Monthly 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 Annually 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 3 340-003 Hourly 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 Code Enforcement Officer II 2 341-002 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 Code Enforcement Officer 1 1 342-001 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 PAGE 2 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- PLANNING Planning Manager 7 301-007 Hourly 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 Monthly 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 Annually 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 Principal Planner 6 302-006 Hourly 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 Monthly 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 Annually 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 Senior Planner 5 303-005 Hourly 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 Monthly 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 Annually 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 Associate Planner II 4 304-004 Hourly 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 Monthly 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 Annually 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 Associate Planner 1 3 305-003 Hourly 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 Monthly 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 Annually 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 Assistant Planner 2 306-002 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Planning Technician 1 307-001 Hourly 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 Monthly 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 Annually 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -SERVICES CommDev Processing Supervisor 4 320-004 Hourly 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 Monthly 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 Annually 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 Senior CommDev Technician 3 321-003 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 CommDev Technician 11 2 322-002 Hourly 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 CommDev Technician 1 1 323-001 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 CITY CLERK Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk 8 500-009 Hourly 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 Monthly 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 Annually 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 Deputy City Clerk 7 501-007 Hourly 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 Records Manager 6 510-006 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 Records Supervisor 4 511-004 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 Senior Records Coordinator 3 512-003 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 PAGE 3 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 Records Coordinator 2 513-002 Hourly Monthly 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 Annually 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 Records Technician 1 514-001 Hourly 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 Monthly 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 Annually 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 CITY MANAGER City Manager (per Employment Contract) 9 100-009 Hourly 171.62 Monthly N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29,747.47 Annually 356,969.60 Assistant City Manager 8 101-008 Hourly 110.41 113.17 116.01 118.91 121.89 124.93 128.05 131.25 134.54 137.89 141.35 144.89 148.51 152.22 156.02 Monthly 19,137.73 19,616.13 20,108.40 20,611.07 21,127.60 21,654.53 22,195.33 22,750.00 23,320.27 23,900.93 24,500.67 25,114.27 25,741.73 26,384.80 27,043.47 Annually 229,652.80 235,393.60 241,300.80 247,332.80 253,531.20 259,854.40 266,344.00 273,000.00 279,843.20 286,811.20 294,008.00 301,371.20 308,900.80 316,617.60 324,521.60 Deputy City Manager 8 102-008 Hourly 100.39 102.89 105.46 108.11 110.80 113.57 116.42 119.32 122.30 125.37 128.50 131.71 135.01 138.38 141.84 Monthly 17,400.93 17,834.27 18,279.73 18,739.07 19,205.33 19,685.47 20,179.47 20,682.13 21,198.67 21,730.80 22,273.33 22,829.73 23,401.73 23,985.87 24,585.60 Annually 208,811.20 214,011.20 219,356.80 224,868.80 230,464.00 236,225.60 242,153.60 248,185.60 254,384.00 260,769.60 267,280.00 273,956.80 280,820.80 287,830.40 295,027.20 Assistant to the City Manager 8 103-008 Hourly 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 Monthly 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 Annually 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 Economic Development Manager 6 120-006 Hourly 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 Monthly 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 Annually 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 COMMUNITY SERVICES Director of Community Services 8 600-008 Hourly 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 Monthly 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 Annually 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 Asst Director of Community Services 7 601-007 Hourly 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 Monthly 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 Annually 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 Community Services Superintendent 6 602-006 Hourly 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 Monthly 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 Annually 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 Community Services Manager 5 603-005 Hourly 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 Monthly 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 Annually 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 Community Services Supervisor II 4 610-004 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 Community Services Supervisor 1 4 611-004 Hourly 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 Monthly 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 Annually 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 Community Services Coordinator II 3 612-003 Hourly 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 Community Services Coordinator 1 3 613-003 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 PAGE 4 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 Community Services Specialist II 2 614-002 Hourly Monthly 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 Annually 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 Community Services Specialist 1 2 615-002 Hourly 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 Monthly 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 Annually 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 Community Services Assistant 1 616-001 Hourly 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 Monthly 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 Annually 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 Senior Recreation Leader 1 617-001 Hourly 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 Monthly 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 Annually 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 Recreation Leader 1 618-001 Hourly 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 Monthly 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 Annually 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 Recreation Assistant 1 619-001 Hourly 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 Monthly 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 Annually 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES - AQUATICS Aquatics Supervisor II 4 620-004 Hourly 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 Monthly 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 Annually 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 Aquatics Supervisor 1 4 621-004 Hourly 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 Aquatics Coordinator 3 622-003 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 Lead Lifeguard 2 623-002 Hourly 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 Monthly 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 Annually 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 Senior Lifeguard 1 624-001 Hourly 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 Monthly 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 Annually 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 Lifeguard 1 625-001 Hourly 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 Monthly 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 Annually 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 Water Safety Instructor 1 626-001 Hourly 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 Monthly 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 Annually 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES - DAY CAMP Day Camp Director 1 654-001 Hourly 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 Monthly 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 Annually 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 Assistant Day Camp Director 1 655-001 Hourly 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 Monthly 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 Annually 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 Day Camp Counselor 1 656-001 Hourly 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 Monthly 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 Annually 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 PAGE 5 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base COMMUNITY SERVICES - THEATER Theater Technical Coordinator II 3 640-003 Hourly 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 Theater Technical Coordinator 1 3 641-003 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 Theater Technical Specialist II 2 642-002 Hourly 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 Monthly 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 Annually 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 Theater Technical Specialist 1 2 643-002 Hourly 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 Monthly 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 Annually 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 Theater Technical Assistant 1 644-001 Hourly 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 Monthly 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 Annually 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 FINANCE Director of Finance 8 200-008 Hourly 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 128.95 Monthly 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 22,351.33 Annually 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 268,216.00 Assistant Director of Finance 7 201-007 Hourly 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 Monthly 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 Annually 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 Fiscal Services Manager 6 202-006 Hourly 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 Monthly 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 Annually 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 Finance Manager 5 204-005 Hourly 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 Monthly 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 Annually 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 FINANCE - ACCOUNTING Senior Accountant 4 240-004 Hourly 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 Monthly 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 Annually 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 Accountant II 3 241-003 Hourly 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 Monthly 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 Annually 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 Accountant I 3 242-003 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 PAGE 6 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Salary Step, MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base FINANCE - ACCOUNTING SUPPORT Accounting Support Supervisor 4 250-004 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 Senior Accounting Technician 3 251-003 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 Accounting Technician II 2 252-002 Hourly 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Accounting Technician 1 2 253-002 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 Accounting Assistant 1 254-001 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 Cashier 1 230-001 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 FINANCE - BUSINESS LICENSE Business License Supervisor 4 260-004 Hourly 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 Senior Business License Technician 3 261-003 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 Business License Technician 2 262-002 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 Business License Assistant 1 263-001 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 FINANCE - PAYROLL Payroll Manager 5 220-005 Hourly 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 Monthly 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 Annually 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 Payroll Administrator 4 222-004 Hourly 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 Monthly 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 Annually 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 Payroll Supervisor 4 221-004 Hourly 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 Monthly 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 Annually 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 Senior Payroll Coordinator 3 223-003 Hourly 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 Monthly 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 Annually 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 Payroll Coordinator 2 224-002 Hourly 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 Monthly 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 Annually 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 Payroll Technician 1 225-001 Hourly 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 PAGE 7 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base FINANCE - PURCHASING Purchasing Manager 5 203-005 Hourly 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 Purchasing Supervisor 4 204-004 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 Senior Buyer 3 205-003 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Buyer II 2 206-002 Hourly 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 Monthly 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 Annually 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 Buyer 1 2 207-002 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 Purchasing Assistant 1 208-001 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 FIRE - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Emergency Manager 7 360-007 Hourly 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 Monthly 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 Annually 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 FIRE - PREVENTION Field Supervisor - Fire 4 353-004 Hourly 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 Monthly 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 Annually 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 Senior Fire Inspector 4 350-003 Hourly 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 Monthly 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 Annually 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 Fire Inspector II 2 351-002 Hourly 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 Monthly 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 Annually 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 Fire Inspector 1 1 352-001 Hourly 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 Monthly 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 Annually 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 PAGE 8 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base HUMAN RESOURCES Director of HR/Risk Management 8 800-008 Hourly 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 Monthly 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 Annually 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 Asst Director of HR/Risk Management 7 801-007 Hourly 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 Monthly 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 Annually 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 HR Supervisor 4 804-004 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 Senior HR Technician 3 805-003 Hourly 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 Monthly 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 Annually 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 HR Technician 11 2 806-002 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 HR Technician 1 2 807-002 Hourly 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 HR Assistant 1 808-001 Hourly 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 Monthly 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 Annually 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Director of IT/Support Services 8 700-008 Hourly 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 Monthly 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 Annually 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 Asst Director of IT/Support Services 7 701-007 Hourly 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 Monthly 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 Annually 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 IT Manager 6 702-006 Hourly 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 Monthly 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 Annually 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 IT Administrator 5 703-005 Hourly 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 Monthly 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 Annually 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 PAGE 9 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 IT Supervisor 4 704-004 Hourly Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 Senior IT Specialist 3 705-003 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 IT Specialist II 2 706-002 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 IT Specialist 1 2 707-002 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 ITTechnician II 1 708-001 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 IT Technician 1 1 709-001 Hourly 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 Monthly 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 Annually 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 MEDIA/MARKETING Multimedia Coordinator 3 921-004 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 Multimedia Specialist 11 2 922-003 Hourly 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 Multimedia Specialist 1 2 923-002 Hourly 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 Multimedia Assistant 1 924-001 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 PUBLIC WORKS Director of PW/City Engineer 8 400-008 Hourly 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 116.82 119.74 122.73 125.80 128.95 Monthly 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 20,248.80 20,754.93 21,273.20 21,805.33 22,351.33 Annually 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 242,985.60 249,059.20 255,278.40 261,664.00 268,216.00 Assistant Director of Public Works 7 400-007 Hourly 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 100.73 103.25 105.83 108.48 111.18 113.97 Monthly 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 17,459.87 17,896.67 18,343.87 18,803.20 19,271.20 19,754.80 Annually 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 209,518.40 214,760.00 220,126.40 225,638.40 231,254.40 237,057.60 Program Manager 7 402-007 Hourly 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 Monthly 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 Annually 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 PUBLIC WORKS - CUSTODIAL Custodian II 2 460-002 Hourly 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 Monthly 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 Annually 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 Custodian 1 1 461-001 Hourly 20.23 20.75 21.26 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 Monthly 3,506.53 3,596.67 3,685.07 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 Annually 42,078.40 43,160.00 44,220.80 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 PAGE 10 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS- ENGINEERING Principal Civil Engineer 6 402-006 Hourly 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 98.27 Monthly 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 17,033.47 Annually 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 204,401.60 Senior Civil Engineer 5 403-005 Hourly 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 Monthly 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 Annually 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 Associate Civil Engineer 4 404-004 Hourly 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 Monthly 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 Annually 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 Associate Engineer II 4 405-004 Hourly 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 Monthly 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 Annually 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 Associate Engineer 1 3 406-003 Hourly 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 Monthly 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 Annually 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 Assistant Engineer II 2 407-002 Hourly 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 Monthly 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 Annually 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 Assistant Engineer 1 2 408-002 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 Engineering Technician 11 1 409-001 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Engineering Technician 1 1 410-001 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 PUBLIC WORKS - INSPECTIONS Supervising PW Inspector 4 420-004 Hourly 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 Monthly 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 Annually 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 Senior PW Inspector 3 421-003 Hourly 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 PW Inspector II 2 422-002 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 PW Inspector 1 1 423-001 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 PUBLIC WORKS - MAINTENANCE Maintenance Manager 7 430-007 Hourly 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 89.03 91.26 93.53 95.89 Monthly 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 15,431.87 15,818.40 16,211.87 16,620.93 Annually 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 185,182.40 189,820.80 194,542.40 199,451.20 Maintenance Superintendent 6 431-006 Hourly 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 80.66 82.67 84.74 86.86 Monthly 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 13,981.07 14,329.47 14,688.27 15,055.73 Annually 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 167,772.80 171,953.60 176,259.20 180,668.80 PAGE 11 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 - M Salary Steps -1�� MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS - LANDSCAPE Maintenance Supervisor - Landscape 5 443-005 Hourly 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 Monthly 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 Annually 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 Field Supervisor - Landscape 4 444-004 Hourly 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 Senior Landscape Inspector 3 440-003 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 Landscape Inspector II 2 441-002 Hourly 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 Monthly 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 Annually 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 Landscape Inspector 1 1 442-001 Hourly 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 Monthly 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 Annually 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 PUBLIC WORKS - PARK ATTENDANT Supervising Park Attendant 4 490-004 Hourly 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 Monthly 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 Annually 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 Park Attendant 111 3 491-003 Hourly 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 Park Attendant II 2 492-002 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 Park Attendant 1 1 493-001 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/PARKS Maintenance Supervisor - Streets/Parks 5 432-005 Hourly 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 Monthly 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 Annually 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 Field Supervisor - Streets/Parks 4 433-004 Hourly 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 Monthly 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 Annually 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets/Parks 3 434-003 Hourly 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 Monthly 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 Annually 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 Maintenance Worker II - Streets/Parks 2 435-002 Hourly 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 Monthly 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 Annually 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 Maintenance Worker I - Streets/Parks 1 436-001 Hourly 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 Monthly 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 Annually 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 PAGE 12 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 �� Salary Steps Mhow- MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES Maintenance Supervisor- Facilities 5 432-005 Hourly 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 Monthly 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 Annually 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 Field Supervisor - Facilities 4 472-004 Hourly 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 Monthly 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 Annually 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 Lead Maintenance Worker- Facilities 3 473-003 Hourly 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 Monthly 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 Annually 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 Maintenance Worker II - Facilities 2 474-002 Hourly 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 Monthly 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 Annually 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 Maintenance Worker I - Facilities 1 475-001 Hourly 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 Monthly 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 Annually 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 PUBLIC WORKS - TRADES Maintenance Supervisor -Trades 5 482-005 Hourly 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 Monthly 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 Annually 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 Field Supervisor -Trades 4 483-004 Hourly 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 Monthly 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 Annually 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 Lead Maintenance Worker - Trades 3 484-003 Hourly 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 Monthly 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 Annually 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 Maintenance Worker 11 - Trades 2 485-002 Hourly 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 Monthly 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 Annually 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 Maintenance Worker I - Trades 1 486-001 Hourly 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 37.51 38.45 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 Monthly 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 6,501.73 6,664.67 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 Annually 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 78,020.80 79,976.00 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SIGNALS Maintenance Supervisor - Signals 5 453-005 Hourly 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 66.20 67.86 69.55 71.29 73.07 74.90 76.78 78.69 Monthly 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 11,474.67 11,762.40 12,055.33 12,356.93 12,665.47 12,982.67 13,308.53 13,639.60 Annually 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 137,696.00 141,148.80 144,664.00 148,283.20 151,985.60 155,792.00 159,702.40 163,675.20 Field Supervisor - Signals 4 454-004 Hourly 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 59.98 61.47 63.02 64.58 Monthly 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 10,396.53 10,654.80 10,923.47 11,193.87 Annually 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 124,758.40 127,857.60 131,081.60 134,326.40 Senior Signal Technician 3 450-003 Hourly 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 54.33 55.69 57.08 58.52 Monthly 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 9,417.20 9,652.93 9,893.87 10,143.47 Annually 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 113,006.40 115,835.20 118,726.40 121,721.60 Signal Technician II 2 451-002 Hourly 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 51.72 53.01 Monthly 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 8,964.80 9,188.40 Annually 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 107,577.60 110,260.80 Signal Technician 1 2 452-002 Hourly 39.42 40.40 41.41 42.44 43.51 44.59 45.71 46.85 48.03 49.23 50.45 Monthly 6,832.80 7,002.67 7,177.73 7,356.27 7,541.73 7,728.93 7,923.07 8,120.67 8,325.20 8,533.20 8,744.67 Annually 81,993.60 84,032.00 86,132.80 88,275.20 90,500.80 92,747.20 95,076.80 97,448.00 99,902.40 102,398.40 104,936.00 PAGE 13 OF 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE June 28, 2025 Adopted by City Council on May 27, 2025 I I Salary Steps Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base SUPPORT SERVICES Support Services Supervisor 4 720-004 Hourly 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 33.99 34.84 35.71 36.60 Monthly 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 5,891.60 6,038.93 6,189.73 6,344.00 Annually 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 70,699.20 72,467.20 74,276.80 76,128.00 Senior Support Services Technician 3 721-003 Hourly 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 30.79 31.57 32.35 33.16 Monthly 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 5,336.93 5,472.13 5,607.33 5,747.73 Annually 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 64,043.20 65,665.60 67,288.00 68,972.80 Support Services Technician 2 722-002 Hourly 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 27.90 28.59 29.30 30.05 Monthly 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 4,836.00 4,955.60 5,078.67 5,208.67 Annually 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 58,032.00 59,467.20 60,944.00 62,504.00 Support Services Assistant 1 723-001 Hourly 21.26 21.79 22.33 22.89 23.46 24.05 24.65 25.28 25.90 26.55 27.21 Monthly 3,685.07 3,776.93 3,870.53 3,967.60 4,066.40 4,168.67 4,272.67 4,381.87 4,489.33 4,602.00 4,716.40 Annually 44,220.80 45,323.20 46,446.40 47,611.20 48,796.80 50,024.00 51,272.00 52,582.40 53,872.00 55,224.00 56,596.80 PAGE 14 OF 14 RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Appropriations Limit will be calculated based on the changes in City population and California per capita personal income. Section 2. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for Fiscal Year 2025- 26, attached hereto, is hereby adopted. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of May 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johi, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johi, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Article XIIIB of the California State Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Gann Initiative or Gann Limit, was approved by California voters in November 1979, and placed limits on the amount of proceeds of taxes that state and local government agencies can receive and spend each year. For cities that incorporated after 1978- 79 (such as the City of Temecula), the voters set the initial appropriations limit at the time of incorporation. Proposition 111 was approved by California voters in June 1990, which provided new adjustment formulas which make the appropriations limit more responsive to local growth issues. Each year the City Council must adopt by resolution the appropriations limit for the following year. Following is the calculation of the City's Gann Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2025-26: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Appropriations Limits................................................................... $362,489,557 CityPopulation Growth............................................................................................................1.19% Per Capita Personal Income Change.........................................................................................6.44% Fiscal Year 2025-26 Appropriations Limit.......................................................................$390,425,308 Appropriations subject to the limit in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget total $107,737,717 which is $282,687,591 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non -tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the appropriations limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources would be subject to the appropriations limit and could not exceed the $282,687,591 variance indicated. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $282,687,591 from budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's appropriations limit, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years or voter approval of an increase in the City's appropriations limit. Voter approval for an increase in the City's appropriations limit is not anticipated in the future due to the margin between the limit and tax revenue. GANN Appropriations Limit 500,000,000 400,000,000 300,000,000 200,000,000 100,000,000 ■ ■ � � � — 0 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 ■ Appropriations Subject to Limit Legal Limit Annual Operating Budget Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Adopt Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps for the City Prepared by the State Fire Marshal RECOMMENDATION: That prior to consideration of the proposed Ordinance, the City Clerk randomly select Mayor Kalfus, Council Member Stewart or Council Member Rahn pursuant to Section 18705 of the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission to achieve a quorum for this Agenda Item since these three Council Members own residential property in the proposed Fire Hazard Severity Zones and three affirmative votes of the Council are required by State law to adopt the Ordinance. 2. That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND ADDING CHAPTER 15.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA BACKGROUND Government Code Section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. On March 24, 2025, pursuant to Government Code section 51178, the State Fire Marshal published a map indicating the Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones for the City of Temecula that designates various areas in the City of Temecula as moderate, high and very high Fire Hazard Severity Zones ("FHSZ"). Within 30 days after receiving the Fire Hazard Severity Zones map, the City made the maps and information available for public review and comment and placed the information and maps on its website in an understandable and accessible form. Information is available on the City's Fire Hazard Severity Zone website at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/Firemap. The recent updates to Fire Hazard Severity Zones in California provide a more precise assessment of wildfire risks using modern climate data and advanced fire modeling. These updates impact Local Responsibility Areas (LRA), influencing fire prevention measures. Including defensible space, building codes, and real estate disclosure requirements. ANALYSIS Factors Used in the Designation of the Fire Hazard Severity Zones Properties are designated as Moderate, High, or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones based on: • Terrain and topography • Vegetation and fuel conditions • Fire history and frequency • Climate and weather patterns The FHSZ maps identify the hazard potential, not the immediate risk. They do not factor in mitigation efforts such as defensible space, fire-resistant construction, or local firefighting capabilities. According to Cal Fire, the fire hazard severity model for wildland fire has two key elements: probability of an area burning and expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather conditions. The zones reflect areas that have similar burn probabilities and fire behavior characteristics. The factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas are fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and potential fuel over a 50-year period. Outside of wildlands, the model considers factors that might lead to buildings being threatened, including terrain, weather, urban vegetation cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, fire history, and fire hazard in nearby wildlands. FHSZs are not a structure loss model, as key information regarding structure ignition (such as roof type, etc.) is not included. Impact of Zone Designation on Homeowners within a Zone Generally, homeowners in Very High FHSZ must: • Maintain 100 feet of defensible space around structures. • Comply with home hardening requirements to reduce ignition risks. • Ensure new construction and renovations adhere to Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) building codes which are found in the California Building Code Chapter 7A. • Disclose FHSZ designation when selling property. Generally, homeowners in High FHSZ must: Comply with home hardening requirements to reduce ignition risks. Ensure new construction and renovations adhere to Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) building codes. Disclose FHSZ designation when selling property. Specifically, Government Code Section 51182 requires homeowners in the Very High FHSZ to: • Maintain defensible space of 100 feet from each side and from the front and rear of the structure. The amount of fuel modification necessary shall consider the flammability of the structure as affected by building material, building standards, location, and type of vegetation. Fuels shall be maintained and spaced in a condition so that a wildfire would be unlikely to ignite the structure. This does not apply to single specimens of trees or other vegetation that are well -pruned and maintained so as to effectively manage fuels and not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from other nearby vegetation to a structure or from a structure to other nearby vegetation or to interrupt the advance of embers toward a structure. The intensity of fuels management may vary within the 100-foot perimeter of the structure, with more intense fuel reductions being used between 5 and 30 feet around the structure, and an ember -resistant zone being required within 5 feet of the structure, to consider the elimination of materials in the ember -resistant zone that would likely be ignited by embers. • Remove that portion of a tree that extends within 10 feet of the outlet of a chimney or stovepipe. • Maintain a tree, shrub, or other plant adjacent to or overhanging a building free of dead or dying wood. • Maintain the roof of a structure free of leaves, needles, or other vegetative materials. These provisions would be enforced through Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Hazardous Vegetation, both on an annual basis and any time violations are or reported. Additionally, the City may not decrease the FHSZ level recommended by State Fire Marshall. The City may add to or increase the recommended FHSZ level, but Riverside County Fire Department (Cal Fire) is not proposing any additions or increases during this adoption process. Fire Insurance Related Questions According to Cal Fire, insurance companies use risk models, which differ from hazard models, because they consider the susceptibility of a structure to damage from fire and other short-term factors that are not included in hazard modeling. It is unlikely that insurance risk models specifically call out Cal Fire's Fire Hazard Severity Zones as a factor, but much of the same data that is used in the fire hazard severity zone model are likely included in the insurance companies' risk models. However, insurance risk models incorporate many additional factors and factors that change more frequently than those that Cal Fire includes in its hazard mapping, which is built to remain steady for the next 10+ years. Procedure for Random Selection Pursuant to Section 18705 of the Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations Government Code Section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Government Code Section 51179 requires that "A local agency shall designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178." Government Code Section 36936 provides that "ordinances require a recorded majority vote of the total membership of the city council." Since the Temecula City Council has five members, three affirmative votes are required to adopt an ordinance and fulfill the requirement of Government Code Section 51779. The personal residences of Mayor Kalfus, Council Member Stewart and Council Member Rahn are located on parcels within the Fire Hazard Severity Zones for the City of Temecula identified by the State Fire Marshal. In the opinion of the City Attorney, these three members may not participate in the Council's decision to approve the Fire Hazard Severity Zones pursuant to Section 18702.2(a)(1) of the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission because the Council action to adopt the Fire Hazard Severity Zones "involves the adoption or amendment of a development plan or criteria applying the parcel." In the event potential conflict of interest will prevent a legislative body from achieving a quorum for the transaction of business, Section 18705 of the Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations specifically authorizes the random selection of one or more members of a legislative body that would have a financial interest in a decision to participate in that decision if necessary to achieve a quorum of the legislative body. Therefore, in order to achieve a quorum of three Members of the City Council pursuant to and to enact an ordinance approving the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps as required by Government Code Sections 36936 and 51779, it is necessary to randomly select either Mayor Kalfus, Council Member Stewart or Council Member Rahn to achieve the required quorum. The following procedures have been found by decisions of the Fair Political Practices to meet the requirements of Section 18705 of the Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations for the random selection of a City Council Member to achieve the required quorum for approval of the Fire Hazard Severity Zones pursuant to Government Code Sections 36936 and 51779: 1. The random selection process will occur just prior to consideration of the Fire Hazard Severity Zone by the Council at the public session at the May 27, 2025 regular meeting of the City Council. 2. This Agenda Report includes a description of the nature of the economic interest of the members involved, the real property interests of the members involved, and a description of the circumstances in which the conflict might arise, and the legal necessity of achieving a quorum to act on this matter, as required by Section 18705. 3. The City Clerk will stand in front of the public audience, with the Deputy City Clerk as a witness, and place the names of Mayor Kalfus, Council Member Stewart and Council Member Rahn on individual pieces of paper into a clear bowl and folded so that their names are not visible or otherwise identifiable. 4. The City Clerk will announce that she will draw the name of one of these Council Members from the bowl and that the Council Member whose name is drawn will be deemed randomly selected to participate in all matters of the City Council to act on the Fire Hazard Severity Zones as required by Government Code Sections 36936 and 51779. 5. The City Clerk will draw a piece of paper from the bowl and announce the name of the member selected to participate in all actions related to the Fire Hazard Severity Zones. 6. The City Clerk will specifically record in the official minutes of City Council a description of the process employed and the name of the Council Member randomly selected to participate. 7. The Council Member randomly selected will then be entitled to participate in all actions of the City Council related to the Fire Hazard Severity Zones as required by Government Code Sections 36936 and 51779. FINANCIAL IMPACTS There are no financial impacts to the City from the recommended action. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A - Ordinance No. 2025-XX 2. Exhibit B - Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map for the City of Temecula 3. Notice of Public Hearing 4. Notice of Exemption 5. Cal Fire's Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Fire Hazard Severity Zones ORDINANCE NO. 2025- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND ADDING CHAPTER 15.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAP AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: (a) Government Code Section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. (b) On March 24, 2025, pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, the State Fire Marshal published a map indicating the Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones designating various areas in the City of Temecula as moderate, high and very high Fire Hazard Severity Zones ("FHSZ's"). (c) Within 30 days after receiving a transmittal from the State Fire Marshall that identifies fire hazard severity zones, the City made the maps and information available for public review and comment and placed the information and maps on its website in an understandable and accessible form. (d) The City has fulfilled all requirements for the adoption of the FHSZ maps. Section 2. Addition of Chapter 15.14, Fire Hazzard Severity Zone Maps. Chapter 15.14, Fire Hazzard Severity Zone Maps, is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 15.14 FIRE HAZZARD SEVERITY ZONE MAPS 15.14.010 Adoption of Fire Severity Zone Map. Pursuant to Government Code section 51179(a), the City Council hereby adopts the fire hazard severity zones for the City of Temecula as recommended by the State Fire Marshal on March 24, 2025 and the map entitled "City of Temecula Fire Hazard Severity Zones" depicting fire hazard severity zones within the City. The City of Temecula Fire Hazard Severity Zones map shall be on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall be available upon request. The official map is also located electronically on the following City website: https://temeculaca.gov/1651/Fire-Hazard-Severity-Map or such other website as designated on the City's official website. 15.14.020 Designation may not be decreased. Pursuant to Government Code section 51179(b)(3) no fire hazard severity zone identified by the State Fire Marshal for an area within the city may be decreased to a lesser fire hazard severity zone. Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). City staff have evaluated the proposed Ordinance and determined that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15303, and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the extent this is a project under CEQA, it is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases or portions might be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of May, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA - RIVERSIDE COUNTY Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones UfVINCORP'KATED RIVERSIDE O. Temecula As Identified by the State Fire Marshal March 24, 2025 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE CO. The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Data Sources: CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1) City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: Long Range Project No. LR25-0097 (Local Fire Hazard Map) Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula to adopt Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps for the City prepared by the State Fire Marshall Environmental Action: City staff have evaluated the proposed Ordinance and determined that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15303, and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the extent this is a project under CEQA, it is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: May 27, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed draft ordinance may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Services Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Mark Collins, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 506-5172. City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProces sina(& asrclkrec. com May 28, 2025 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Long Range Project Number LR25-0097, an Ordinance designating fire hazard severity zones Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the City will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Collins at email: Mark. Co1hns(c-r�,TemeculaCA. gov. Sincerely, Matt Peters Director of Community Development Enclosures: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Long Range Project No. LR25-0097 - Ordinance designating Ere hazard severity zones Description of Project: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula adopting the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map and adding Chapter 15.14 (Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map) to the Temecula Municipal Code Project Location: Citywide Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula The City Council approved the above -described project on May 27', 2025, and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ❑ Categorical Exemption: ®Other: Section 15061 (b)(3), 15303, 15304, 15305, 15307 and 15308. Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: The proposed Ordinance and determined that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15303, and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the extent this is a project under CEQA, it is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). The proposed ordinance designates local fire hazard severity zones as mandated by state law and does not propose or authorize any construction nor physical changes to the environment. Contact Person/Title: Mark Collins, Associate Planner Telephone Number (951) 506-5172 Signature: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT: 2024 Fire Hazard Severity Zones _ Fire Hazard Severity Zones Explained • What is a "Fire Hazard Severity Zone," or FHSZ? o Answer: Public Resource Code 4202; The State Fire Marshal shall classify lands within state responsibility areas into fire hazard severity zones. Each zone shall embrace relatively homogeneous lands and shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors present, including areas where winds have been identified by the department as a major cause of wildfire spread. Government Code 51178; The State Fire Marshal shall identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. • Why are fire hazard severity maps being updated? o Answer: The hazard maps are being updated to more accurately reflect the zones in California that are susceptible to wildfire. The hazard mapping process will incorporate new science in local climate data and improved fire assessment modeling in determining hazard ratings. • What do Fire Hazard Severity Zones measure? o Answer: The Fire Hazard Severity Zone map evaluates "hazard," not "risk". The map is like flood zone maps, where lands are described in terms of the probability level of a particular area being inundated by floodwaters, and not specifically prescriptive of impacts. "Hazard" is based on the physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire, or fuel reduction efforts. "Risk" is the potential damage a fire can do to the area under existing conditions, accounting for any modifications such as fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition resistant building construction. • Where do Fire Hazard Severity Zones apply? o Answer: Fire Hazard Severity Zones are found in areas where the state has financial responsibility for wildfire protection and prevention, called the State Responsibility Area. More than 31 million acres are in this area. Under Senate Bill 63 (Stern, 2021) Government Code 51178 was amended to add the Moderate and High Fire Hazard Severity Zones with the Very High in local jurisdictions. • What are the uses of Fire Hazard Severity Zones? o Answer: The zones are used for several purposes including to designate areas where California's defensible space standards and wildland urban interface building codes are CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 1 required. They can be a factor in real estate disclosure, and local governments may consider them in their general plan. • Is there an easy way to determine the Fire Hazard Severity Zone of my property? o Answer: You can search by address to find your current designation on the web at: osfm.fire.ca.ov/FHSZ • What are the key elements of the Fire Hazard Severity Zone model? o Answer: The fire hazard severity model for wildland fire has two key elements: probability of an area burning and expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather conditions. The zones reflect areas that have similar burn probabilities and fire behavior characteristics. The factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas are fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and potential fuel over a 50-year period. Outside of wildlands, the model considers factors that might lead to buildings being threatened, including terrain, weather, urban vegetation cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, fire history, and fire hazard in nearby wildlands. FHSZs are not a structure loss model, as key information regarding structure ignition (such as roof type, etc.) is not included. • How do the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps differ from California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) High Fire Threat District Maps? o Answer: The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) sponsored map, known as "CPUC High Fire Threat District Map" (HFTD), includes similar factors as those in the FHSZ maps, however the CPUC HFTD Map is designed specifically for identifying areas where there is an increased risk for utility associated wildfires. As such, the CPUC map includes fire hazards associated with historical powerline-caused wildfires, current fuel conditions, and scores areas based on where fires start, as opposed to where potential fires may cause impacts. • Why is my property in a different zone than the adjacent area, which looks similar? o Answer: In non-wildland areas, zone edges occur based on distance to the wildland edge. Because hazard in these areas is largely determined by incoming embers from adjacent wildland, urban areas that are similar in vegetation type and housing density may have a change in FHSZ class as the distance to the wildland edge increases. Areas immediately adjacent to wildland receive the same FHSZ score as that wildland where fire originates, and the model then produces lower scores as the distance to wildland edge increases. In wildland areas, zone edges are a result of the way zones are delineated. Specifically, zones represent areas of similar slope and fuel potential. Zone boundaries divide zones based on geographic and vegetation features that align with fire hazard potential; although, at a local scale, it may appear that the immediate area is similar on both sides of the edge. The class value within a zone is based on the average hazard score across the whole zone, so areas that are in the same zone but not immediately adjacent to a local area can have an influence on the final zone classification. Data Related Questions • How are Fire Hazard Severity Zones determined? o Answer: CAL FIRE used the best available science and data to develop, and field test a model that served as the basis of zone assignments. The model evaluated the probability of CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 2 the area burning and potential fire behavior in the area. Many factors were included such as fire history, vegetation, flame length, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, terrain, and weather. • What new data will be included in the new model, and how does this differ from the previous model? o Answer: A 2 km grid of climate data covering the years 2003-2018 is being used in the update. The previous model used stock weather inputs across the state to calculate wildland fire intensity scores. The updated model will adjust fire intensity scores based on the most extreme fire weather at a given location, considering temperature, humidity, and wind speed. In addition, ember transport is being modeled based on local distributions of observed wind speed and direction values instead of using a generic buffer distance for urban areas adjacent to wildlands. What is the difference between the various Fire Hazard Severity Zones? o Answer: Classification of a wildland zone as Moderate, High or Very High fire hazard is based on the average hazard across the area included in the zone, which have a minimum size of 200 acres. In wildlands, hazard is a function of modeled flame length under the worst conditions and annual burn probability. Both these factors generally increase with increasing hazard level, but there may be instances where one value is Very High and the other is low, pushing the overall hazard into a more intermediate ranking. On average, both modeled flame length and burn probability increase by roughly 40-60% between hazard classes. Classification outside of wildland areas is based on the fire hazard of the adjacent wildland and the probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. • Why does the model place an emphasis on the spread of embers? o Answer: Embers spread wildfire because they can travel long distances in the wind and ignite vegetation, roofs, attics (by getting into vents), and decks. State Regulated Area Questions When were the maps last updated? o Answer: The Office of the State Fire Marshal began the regulatory process for the State Responsibility Area (SRA) in December 2022, the final maps were adopted on January 31, 2024, and became effective April 1, 2024. What is "State Responsibility Area," or SRA? o Answer: SRA is a legal term defining the area where the state has financial responsibility for wildland fire protection and prevention. Incorporated cities and federal ownership are not included. Within the SRA, CAL FIRE is responsible for fire prevention and suppression. There are more than 31 million acres in SRA, with an estimated 1.7 million people and 800,000 existing homes. How is state responsibility area determined? o Answer: The Board of Forestry and Fire Protection (Board) classifies land as State Responsibility Area. The legal definition of SRA is found in the Public Resources Code Section 4125. The Board has developed detailed procedures to classify lands as State Responsibility Area. Lands are removed from SRA when they become incorporated by a city, change in ownership to the federal government, become more densely populated, or are converted to intensive agriculture that minimizes the risk of wildfire. While some lands are removed from SRA automatically, the Board typically reviews changes every five years. CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 3 • What Fire Hazard Severity Zones are in State Responsibility Area? o Answer: All of the State Responsibility Area is in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Lands are either ranked as Moderate, High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. What are the wildland urban interface (WUI) building codes in State Responsibility Area? o Answer: The WUI building codes (California Building Code (CBC) Chapter 7A) reduce the risk of embers fanned by wind-blown wildfires from igniting buildings. The codes for roofing, siding, decking, windows, and vents apply throughout all state responsibility area regardless of the fire hazard severity ranking. Ember -resistant building materials can be found at: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/fire-engineering-and investigations/buildingmaterials-listing/ Is the GIS data for Fire Hazard Severity Zones available for download? o Answer: The data inputs used to develop the Fire Hazard Severity Zones are identified in the Initial Statement of Reasons (ISOR) Title 19 Development (ca.gov). CAL FIRE has developed an additional data package which consists of sequential modeling steps, including any data inputs that were not already publicly available and referenced in the ISOR. The data package encompasses 34 spatial datasets and 8 tables, provided in raster, polygon, and table format. These datasets are formatted for Esri ArcGIS software, except for four tables provided in Excel. Ten of the datasets are updated versions used to produce an edited SRA FHSZ map following the public comment period that ended April 4, 2023. Upon formal adoption of the FHSZ map, the final SRA FHSZ geospatial data file will become available. The data package is available on the FHSZ website Fire Hazard Severity Zones ca. ov under the science and methods banner. Why do waterbodies have a Fire Hazard Severity Zone Classification? o Answer: All areas in State Responsibility Area, including water bodies, require a fire hazard severity zone designation. The 2007 FHSZ maps zoned all water as moderate by default. In the 2023 FHSZ model we added a buffer of FHSZ from the surrounding wildland into water bodies to account for potential threat of embers to buildings on docks and house boats, as well as variation in reservoir height that occurs with drought. Local Regulated Area Questions • What is "Local Responsibility Area", or LRA? o Answer: Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) are incorporated cities, urban regions, agriculture lands, and portions of the desert where the local government is responsible for wildfire protection. This is typically provided by city fire departments, fire protection districts, counties, and by CAL FIRE under contract. When did Fire Hazard Severity Zones start in Local Responsibility Area? o Answer: The "Bates Bill" (AB 337), Government Code Section 51175, was prompted by the devastating Oakland Hills Fire of 1991. This mid-1990s legislation calls for CAL FIRE to evaluate fire hazard severity in local responsibility area and to make a recommendation to the local jurisdiction where very high FHSZs exist. The Government Code then provides direction for the local jurisdiction to take appropriate action. How are Fire Hazard Severity Zones determined in local responsibility areas? o Answer: CAL FIRE uses an extension of the state responsibility area Fire Hazard Severity CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 4 Zone model as the basis for evaluating fire hazard in Local Responsibility Area. The Local Responsibility Area hazard rating reflects flame and ember intrusion from adjacent wildlands and from flammable vegetation in the urban area. What are the requirements for landowners in FHSZs in local responsibility areas? o Answer: California's WUI building codes (CBC Chapter 7A) apply to the design and construction of new buildings located in High and Very High FHSZs in Local Responsibility Areas. Local ordinances may require ignition resistant construction for remodel projects. Check with your local building department to determine which ignition resistant building codes apply to your project. In addition, Government Code Section 51182 calls for defensible space clearance and other wildland fire safety practices for buildings. Owners are also required to make a natural hazard disclosure as part of a real estate transfer. For information regarding "home hardening" and defensible space clearance, visit www. ReadyForWi ldfi re. org. Does the designation of Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area trigger the 100-foot clearance requirement? o Answer: Yes, per Government Code 51182 unless a local government has passed a more stringent requirement, the 100-foot defensible space clearance applies. For information regarding "home hardening" and defensible space clearance, visit www. ReadyForWi ldfi re. org. • How does CAL FIRE assist Local Governments in Fire Hazard Severity Zones? o Answer: CAL FIRE's Land Use Planning Program is a specialized unit that provides support to local governments by providing fire safety expertise on the State's wildland urban interface building codes, wildfire safety codes, as well as helping in the development of the safety elements in general plans. What is the process for developing Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area? o Answer: CAL FIRE uses the same modeling data that is used to map the State Responsibility Area. The map, along with a model ordinance, are then sent to the governing body for adoption. How are the new Fire Hazard Severity Zones impacting development? o Answer: Many of the changes expanding fire hazard severity zones in local responsibility areas (LRA) have been supported by the building industry. CAL FIRE works closely with the building industry when setting various building codes and defensible space requirements, so we are working together to not affect development itself but to make sure development matches the hazards of that area. When will the Local Responsibility Area Map be released? o Answer: The Local Responsibility Area Map Process will happen after the State Responsibility Area process has been completed, which is estimated to occur in the winter of 2025. Why haven't Moderate and High Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes been classified before in the Local Responsibility Area? o Answer: New legislation, Senate Bill 63 (Stern, 2021), now requires the adoption of all three Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes in the Local Responsibility Area. Previously only Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones were required for adoption in Local Responsibility Areas. CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 5 Insurance Related Questions Will the new Fire Hazard Severity Zones affect my ability to get or maintain insurance? o Answer: Insurance companies use risk models, which differ from hazard models, because they consider the susceptibility of a structure to damage from fire and other short-term factors that are not included in hazard modeling. It is unlikely that insurance risk models specifically call out CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones as a factor, but much of the same data that is used in the fire hazard severity zone model are likely included in the insurance companies' risk models. However, insurance risk models incorporate many additional factors and factors that change more frequently than those that CAL FIRE includes in its hazard mapping, which is built to remain steady for the next 10+ years. Resources, Additional Information, and Contact Information • To find the current FHSZ designation for a property, visit FHSZ Map Viewer (ca.gov). • Helpful links: o FHSZ Website: 0 osfm.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ o FHSZ Map Viewer: 0 FHSZ Map Viewer (ca.gov) Contacts for FHSZ for Public Questions: o (916)633-7655 o FHSZinformation@fire.ca.pov CAL FIRE —December 18, 2024 2024 FAQ Page 6 Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Award Consultant Contract to De Novo Planning Group for Comprehensive General Plan Update PREPARED BY: Laurel Reimer, AICP, Planning Consultant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve an agreement for consultant services with De Novo Planning Group in the amount of $1,756,847, for the preparation of a Comprehensive General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and Program Environmental Impact Report; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $175,684.70, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: California State Law requires every jurisdiction to adopt a comprehensive General Plan as the fundamental policy document for future development. A general plan includes community -wide priorities, goals, and specific implementation measures to guide the City's physical, economic, social, and environmental changes. The City's General Plan was last comprehensively updated in 2005. The City planned a four -phase process to set the stage for a comprehensive General Plan Update, including adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element, updating the Quality of Life Master Plan, and preparing a land use economic opportunity study. The comprehensive General Plan Update is the fourth phase of the process (see Attachment 2). On, March 14, 2025, the City of Temecula released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for consultant services to prepare a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan, including a Climate Action Plan (in compliance with AB32) and Program Environmental Impact Report. The RFP was placed on the City's online bidding system (PlanetBids), proposals were received on April 14, 2025, and interviews were conducted on April 30 and May 1, 2025. Based on their submitted proposal and subsequent interview, staff determined that De Novo Planning Group was the most qualified consultant. De Novo Planning Group has successfully performed similar projects for jurisdictions throughout California and has the necessary experience and expertise to provide the City with a high -quality and user-friendly general plan. Additionally, the firm previously completed the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element and demonstrated a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing the City in the decades to come. The term of the agreement would run through June 30, 2027, with the option for a one-year extension. FISCAL IMPACT: The Comprehensive General Plan Update project is included in the Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (Attachment 3). Funds are available and budgeted for in Account No. 210.265.999.5800 PW21-02 / 777. Additional funding will be allocated in future years, as needed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement 2. General Plan Update Process & Timeline 3. CIP Budget Sheet AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP Comprehensive General Plan Update THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 27, 2025, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and De Novo Planning Group a California S-Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on May 27, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for one (1) additional one (1) year term. In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2028. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed one million seven hundred fifty-six thousand eight hundred forty-seven dollars and zero cents ($1,756,847.00), plus 10% Contingency of one hundred seventy-five thousand eight hundred forty-seven dollars and seventy cents ($175,684.70), for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by the City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. 01 /01 /2025 The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be 01 /01 /2025 maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 01 /01 /2025 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every Consultant will be required to secure the payment of compensation to it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. By executing this Agreement, Consultant is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in aggregate. Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager. c. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant's products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 01 /01 /2025 5) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) If the Consultant's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the consultant. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Consultant, and all subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 01 /01 /2025 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: De Novo Planning Group Attn: Amanda Tropiano 180 E. Main Street, Suite 108 Tustin, CA 92780 01 /01 /2025 14. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following 01 /01 /2025 non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non - monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 01 /01 /2025 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP By: Ben Ritchie, President By: Steven McMurty, Chief Financial Officer CONSULTANT De Novo Planning Group Amanda Tro iano 180 E. Main Street, Suite 108 Tustin, CA 92780 714-453-7711 atropiano@denovoplanning.com _ s 01 /01 /2025 EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed All tasks to be performed are per the proposal provided by the Consultant attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 10 01/01/2025 I 1 CITY OF TEMECULA Professional Services To Prepare a Comprehensive General Plan Update .�f � •TEMECULA• r a. PREPARED FOR: City of Temecula 41000 Main St Temecula, CA 92590 Submitted April 14, 2025 De Novo Planning Group A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm PREPARED BY: De Novo Planning Group 180 E Main Street, Suite 108 Tustin, CA 92780 In Association With: Economic and Planning Systems Fehr & Peers I Fuscoe I JZMK Partners Kearns & West I Michael Baker I South Environmental De Novo Planning Group A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm April 14, 2025 Laurel Reimer City of Temecula Project Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Proposal to Prepare a Comprehensive General Plan Update A City seeped in rich history and tradition, the process to update Temecula's General Plan serves as an op- portunity to celebrate the community's past, embrace its present, and plan for its future. As one of the fast- est growing communities in the state, Temecula has experienced first-hand how changes in transportation, technology, market factors, and environmental conditions require cities to think carefully about how best to address long-term opportunities and challenges, all while maintaining an outstanding quality of life. Building off of recent City plans, programs, engagement, and research this General Plan Update will set the stage for continued prosperity over the next 20 years. OUR TEAM De Novo Planning Group would serve as the prime consultant for this contract with the City. Our team is led by De Novo Principal Amanda Tropiano (who will serve as Project Manager and Principal -in -Charge and who managed the City's recent successful Housing Element Update), Starla Barker, AICP (who will serve as the CEQA lead and who currently manages multiple CEQA projects for the City through our on - call contract), and Erik Anderson, who will serve as Assistant Project Manager. We are excited to carry our local experience forward to the General Plan. We will remain personally involved in every aspect of the project from start to finish. General Plan updates and preparation of associated documents, including climate action plans and environ- mental documents, are De Novo's bread and butter. Our practice was built on our team's ability to successfully complete this type of work. We are deliberate about the projects we pursue to ensure that our team is able to deliver the highest quality of work to all of our clients; this process includes an analysis of our internal capac- ity and our ability to exceed expectations on all aspects of the project. Our southern California team recently completed two General Plan assignments in early 2025 (La Verne and Indian Wells) and we are on -track to complete another before the end of 2025 (Laguna Niguel). This leaves us with only two active focused GPUs in southern California (Brea and Glendale, both in the EIR stages) and we have true capacity and enthusiasm to take on a new assignment. We would be honored have Temecula as that opportunity. This is a big project and it deserves a big team. De Novo is joined by the following subject area experts: Economic & Planning Systems (economic/fiscal), Fehr & Peers (circulation/mobility), Fuscoe (infrastructure), Kearns & West (outreach), JZMK Partners (urban design), Michael Baker (climate planning), and South En- vironmental (cultural resources). This project team has worked together on numerous recent General Plan Updates and EIRs; we truly enjoy working together and we bring that shared respect and collaboration to all of our clients. All of our team members are ready to start work immediately upon the City's notice to proceed and are committed to delivering the products on time and on budget. DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP 180 E MAIN STREET, SUITE 108 1 TUSTIN CA 92780 2 ATROPIANO@DENOVOPLANNING.COM 1 (714) 453-7711 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update WHY DE NOVO De Novo is a relatively small planning firm in terms of staff size. We know this, and we embrace it. We consider our size to be a tremendous asset to our clients since it allows us to provide superior levels of customer service at very competitive billing rates. Larger firms tend to carry cumbersome overhead costs, which results in the need for higher hourly billing rates, frequent contract modifications, and higher staff turnover. As an owner of the company, your Project Manager Amanda Tropiano is able to make quick decisions to keep the project moving forward. Having worked with us on prior projects, we hope we've demonstrated to you our outstanding commitment to the City of Temecula. We take tremendous pride in our ability to not only craft exceptional general plans, but to also prepare a use- ful and legally defensible EIR, which will serve the City well for years to come. We propose to craft the General Plan to be a self -mitigating document, wherein the policies and actions contained in the General Plan will also serve as implementing mitigation measures to be applied at the project level during the processing of subsequent applications and City programs. This proven approach has been very successful in reducing the burdens placed on staff and the development community following general plan adoption. All of De Novo's principal -level planners prefer to roll up our sleeves and work on our projects ourselves. As managers of the company, we take great pride in our work products, and we strive to build a strong connection with each of our clients. The greatest compliment that our clients pay us is to invite us back to provide additional services. OUR STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT We have structured this scope of work to best meet the City's needs, as we understand them. However, I would like to emphasize that we are more than happy to work collaboratively with the City to refine this scope of work and approach to best meet the City's needs and expectations for this very important project. We are confident that De Novo's expertise in preparing General Plan Updates across California coupled with our subconsultant team's proven collaborative approach presents the City with a unique opportunity to hire a team of consultants with the best possible combination of skills needed for this project. We look forward to the opportunity to further discuss our proposal and our approach to the preparation of your General Plan. The offer contained in this proposal is valid for a minimum of 120 days. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 453-7711 or at atropiano@ denovoplanning.com. Sincerely, 1 Amanda Tropiano Principal, General Plan Project Manager De Novo Planning Group 3 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Table of Contents Qualifications and Experience...................5 Technical Approach and Timeline ............. 39 Price......................................... 62 Appendix A: Resumes ........................ 66 De Novo Planning Group 4 QUALIFI AND EX DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP De Novo Planning Group is a land use and environmental planning firm specializing in community planning, environmental studies, design, and de- velopment services. Founded in 2008 in the greater Sacramento area, De Novo opened an office in Orange County in 2017—led by Principal Aman- da Tropiano—to serve southern California clients. The firm's principal -level staff have successfully completed over 400 projects consisting of compre- hensive general plans, visioning plans, specific plans, housing elements, en- vironmental impact reports, negative declarations, initial studies, NEPA anal- yses, climate action plans, biological assessments, wetland delineations, and development projects throughout California. As part of essentially all of our long-range planning projects, De Novo designs and implements communi- ty engagement programs. OUR MISSION Our mission is to provide municipal and private sector clients with world -class professional services, through principal -level attention to every project. We pride ourselves on our ability to work with clients to balance their economic, social, environmental, legal, and political goals. Our services result in an inte- grated planning and environmental solution for every project that is technical- ly sound, cost effective and delivered within the client's schedule. OUR PHILOSOPHY Our philosophy is to proactively plan and design projects in such a way that public and environmental concerns are addressed and accommodated early in the process. We strongly believe in the use of local knowledge for devel- oping sensible and cost-effective solutions to local concerns. Our solutions integrate local knowledge with the best available resources to achieve recog- nized national and international standards for planning and environmental management, to achieve a balance in local economic, social, and environ- mental goals. De Novo Planning Group is dedicated to fostering a partner- ship with each agency we serve, through listening to the community and stakeholders and reflecting the ideas and concerns we hear in the approach developed for each project. OUR TEAM The work program will be led out of our southern California office located in the City of Tustin. De Novo is a California S-Corporation and has 25 full-time staff, including five Principals, three Principal Planners, five Senior Planners, and a team of technical associates. We provide personal service to all of our clients and are committed to exceeding your expectations on all components of the work plan. DIR#: PW-LR-1000363920 Years in Business: 17 Date of Incorporation: 2008 Type: S-Corp Website: https://www.denovoplanningcom/ DE NOVO SERVICE AREAS Community Planning • General Plans • Visioning Plans • Housing Elements • Specific Plans • Zoning Codes • Public Facilitation • Grant Writing • Project Management • Application Processing • Project Review/Peer Review Environmental Studies • CEQA Compliance • NEPA Compliance • Noise Studies • Biological Studies • Agricultural Studies • Air Quality Studies • Climate Action Plans • Sustainability Planning • Mitigation Monitoring • Permitting Design • Land Use Plans • Subdivision Layouts • Site Planning • Design Guidelines Development • Feasibility Studies • Due Diligence Packages • Competition Analyses • Cost Estimate De Novo Planning Group 6 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SUB -CONSULTANTS (00 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) is a land eco- nomics consulting firm experienced in the full spectrum of services related to real estate development, the financ- ing of public infrastructure and government services, land use planning, and government organization. EPS was founded on the principle that real estate develop- ment and land use -related public policy should be built on realistic assessment of market forces and economic trends, feasible implementation measures, and recogni- tion of public policy objectives, including provisions for required public facilities and services. Since 1983 EPS has provided consulting services to hun- dreds of public- and private -sector clients in California and throughout the United States. Clients include cities, counties, special districts, multi -jurisdictional authorities, property owners, developers, financial institutions, and land use attorneys. The firm excels in preparing concise analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support deci- sion making, and provide solutions to real estate devel- opment and land use -related problems. EPS, in association with allied planning, civil engineering, transportation, and environmental firms, has been in- volved with the development of numerous General Plans. The firm's integrated approach to land use, transporta- tion, market, fiscal, and financial issues results in plans that effectively and efficiently guide future development. EPS evaluates market support for various land uses to de- termine key product characteristics, the prices/rents that can be obtained, and market absorption rates. This infor- mation is used for programming the mix of land uses in the plan and for providing the inputs required for financial feasibility analyses and development of a financing plan for the public facilities needed to serve the plan. EPS's fiscal impact models estimate the costs of government services required by new development and the offsetting revenues that the development will generate. DIP#: 1000046979 Principal/Manager: Julie Cooper, Principal Years in Business: 42 Date of Incorporation: 1983 Type: Corporation Website: https://www.epsys.com/ FEHR� PEERS Fehr & Peers is passionate about transforming transpor- tation consulting through innovation and creativity. The firm derives inspiration by partnering with communities to understand and shape local transportation futures objectively tailored to diverse needs. Clients trust Fehr & Peers to help them overcome barriers and uncertainty by combining advanced expertise with curiosity, humil- ity, and initiative to deliver implementable, data -driven solutions that reinforce community values. From the most straightforward to the most complex, team mem- bers actively listen to client and community needs and handle every project with diligence and focus. Fehr & Peers is a specialized consulting firm focused on developing transportation planning and engineering solutions. Their transportation planners are known for their expertise in helping clients understand the land use, transportation, economic, and environmental out- comes of their decisions. This skill set is particularly im- portant in the development of a general plan that will serve as the constitution for a local agency. In addition, the specific Fehr & Peers staffing for this project includes seasoned professionals with local experience: Jason Pack, who has led hundreds of planning projects in the local area over his 20+ year career, and Katy Cole and An- drew Scher who have extensive experience serving the City of Temecula and preparing planning projects in the surrounding area. Fehr & Peers has worked with the City of Temecula for over a decade on several projects such as: Old Town Park- ing Management, Cherry Street Extension EIR, French Valley 1-15 Transportation Analysis, VMT guidelines devel- opment, Complete Streets Ordinance, and grant writing for Safe Streets and Roads for All. DIP#: 1000011330 Principal/Manager: Jason Pack, Principal -in -Charge Years in Business: 40 Date of Incorporation: 1985 Type: Corporation Website: https://www.fehrandpeers.com/ De Novo Planning Group 7 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update F U S C 0 E i ■ 6 11 E N N 1 N 6 Fuscoe Engineering Inc. provides civil engineering for land development and public infrastructure using an eco-adaptive® approach. Specialty practices include survey & mapping services; water quality assurance; sus- tainable engineering; and geospatial technology. Fuscoe has delivered a broad range of services for numerous cit- ies and agencies for General Plan & Specific Plan EIRs. Project assignments have included these services: • Identifying opportunities and feasibility of proposed land uses and revitalization projects in urban, suburban and rural settings » Evaluating zoning and land use changes » Identifying measures to reduce potential impacts of proposed developments for construction and post -construction conditions • Providing infrastructure analysis, identifying infrastructure system deficiencies and offering recommendations • Preparing hydrology, flood control, sewer and water quality technical studies related to proposed land use changes • Prepare Water Supply Assessments and coordinate findings with local and regional wholesale water providers. » Evaluate implications of mandatory RHNA housing units on local and regional water supply providers and assess impacts on local and regional wastewater treatment providers • Drainage, sewer and water master planning » Crafting innovative designs for preserving and stabilizing water courses while enabling mixed- use,TOD and infrastructure uses » Developing storm water runoff management, grading and infrastructure plans » Devising low impact development (LID) strategies for land and water quality protection » > Providing impact assessments for CEQA compliance DIP#: 1000015538 Principal/Manager: Ian Adam, Vice President Years in Business: 33 Date of Incorporation: 1992 Type: Limited Liability Company Website: https://www.fuscoe.com J Z M K P A R T N E R$ JZMK Partners is a dynamic and award -winning interna- tional architectural and urban planning firm that has built a reputation based on the premise that design solutions should be creative, inspirational, and provide long term value. The firm has distinguished itself as an innovative problem solver in the design of single and multi -family housing, including affordable and senior communities, as well as in luxury and resort projects. The JZMK Team is passionate about design excellence and innovation. This enthusiasm for our work creates positive creative energy within the office and filters through to create a collaborative spirit among our team members. Our group of highly skilled and multi -disci- plinary specialists embrace this collaborative spirit and work together to balance environmental ethos with de- velopment objectives when developing solutions for cli- ents. With their fingers on the pulse of emerging indus- try trends, our highly skilled professionals are sought -out speakers across the country. EXPERTISE • Architects • Urban Designers » Landscape Architects » Construction Experts • Graphic Artists • Entitlement Experts MISSION With a fusion of inspired people and dynamic processes, JZMK Partners addresses client and community needs with planning and design solutions that are contextual, innovative and sustainable for the long term. DIP#:In Process Principal/Manager: Andrew Watkins, Partner Years in Business: 65 Date of Incorporation: 1960 Type: Corporation Website: https://jzmkpartners.com De Novo Planning Group 8 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Kearns & West, in business since 1984, specializes in community engagement, stakeholder facilitation, and communications services. We partner with municipal leaders and stakeholders to formulate strategies for both citywide community engagement and specific projects. Cities rely on us to help them establish more effective communication channels, create proactive processes for identifying and resolving issues and concerns, and en- sure public involvement has a place in shaping the fu- ture. In fact, we focus exclusively on this type of work, al- most entirely for government agencies from the federal to local level. Our team's diverse lived and learned expe- riences inform a variety of in -person, hybrid, and virtual opportunities for public involvement. Kearns & West's approach to community engagement begins with an assessment of local community charac- teristics, communication opportunities and challenges, and potential for community growth and change. The development of the Community Engagement and Out- reach Strategy creates a roadmap for working with the community throughout the duration of the process. Ke- arns & West staff have the technical depth to understand and bring non -technical people into conversations on general plans and planning. With years of subject matter expertise, the Kearns & West team identifies opportuni- ties to make technical planning processes more accessi- ble and engaging. No strangers to the region, Kearns & West team members have worked on a variety of proj- ects in the Central Valley. Staff brings their experience engaging residents, employees, and organizations serv- ing rural areas, farm communities, and small but vibrant cities. Importantly for community engagement for the City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update, the Ke- arns & West team has specialized expertise conducting community engagement for general plan updates and other types of citywide planning projects. DIP#: 1001108063 Principal/Manager: Jenna Tourje-Maldonado Years in Business: 41 Date of Incorporation: 1984 Type: Website: https://kearnswest.com/ I N T E R N A T I a N A L Michael Baker is a leading global provider of engineer- ing and consulting services with over 80 years of firm experience, which includes planning, architectural, en- vironmental, construction, program management, and full life -cycle support services, as well as information technology and communications services and solu- tions. A privately held company with more than $1 billion in annual revenue, Michael Baker has more than 6,000 employees in over 90 offices located across the U.S. and internationally. The Michael Baker Team in California is comprised primarily of experts from the legacy compa- nies of RBF Consulting and PMC. With roots in southern California since 1944, the firm has gained recognition in the profession of consulting planning, environmental, and engineering services throughout the State of Cali- fornia. More than 75 professionals are dedicated to Environmen- tal, Planning, Urban Design, and Landscape Architecture services company -wide. As a leader in the environmen- tal consulting field, Michael Baker offers an extensive ar- ray of services associated with environmental planning and documentation. The Michael Baker Environmental staff have prepared climate action plans, sustainability plans, hazard mitigation plans, and adaptation and re- siliency plans for a diverse range of municipalities and agencies. Michael Baker produces environmental docu- ments that are sensitive to both the public's concern for resource protection and community impacts, as well as real -world issues associated with cost and feasibility of implementing sustainability measures. Michael Baker's environmental managers have a broad resume of proj- ect experience in coastal, urban, and rural communities and have worked on numerous complex projects requir- ing technical expertise, creative solutions, and develop- ment of effective and workable mitigation. Our team has a thorough understanding of local, State, and Federal regulations on climate change. DIP#: 1000631983 Principal/Manager: Eddie Torres Years in Business: 85 go Date of Incorporation: 1940 Type: Website: https://mbakerintl.com/ De Novo Planning Group 9 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL South Environmental is a certified Woman -Owned Busi- ness Enterprise (WBE), Disadvantaged Business Enter- prise (DBE), and Small Business Enterprise (SBE). We use the latest technologies and best science available to further the conservation and preservation of natural and cultural resources in Southern California while helping our clients obtain their project goals and objectives. Our firm builds close relationships with agencies and orga- nizations whose missions align with ours, and we assist with the planning and implementation of projects dedi- cated to the preservation and conservation of California's natural areas, rare species, and historic resources. Our team of technical experts includes a Certified Wild- life Biologist, Urban Forester, Certified Arborists, Regis- tered Professional Archaeologists, Architectural Histo- rians, GIS Analysts, and Data Scientists that ensure the quality and strength of our science. We understand how to efficiently move projects through complicated per- mitting processes, saving our clients time and money by producing polished and professional work products that balance project goals with federal, state, and local agen- cy requirements. Specific services we offer fall into four general categories: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Urban Forestry, and GIS & Data Science. South Environmental specializes in completion of environmental compliance documen- tation to support the required permitting processes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Na- tional Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and all applicable local regulations. Our primary work products include biologi- cal and cultural resources assessments, historic resource evaluation reports, biological resource management planning (habitat conservation plans, avian and nesting bird protection plans, mitigation and monitoring plans, urban forest management plans, and other supporting environmental work. DIP#: 1000837116 Principal/Manager: Samantha Murray Years in Business: 7 Date of Incorporation: 2018 Type: Partnership Website: https://southenvironmental.com/ De Novo Planning Group 10 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AN EXPERIENCED PROJECT TEAM The De Novo Planning Group team represents a full -service team of city planning and subject -matter experts capable of providing all services requested by the City. We recognize and appreciate the tremendous commitment you are mak- ing to this program; the impacts to your time and financial resources are real and significant and it is our goal to work with you on an innovative program that results in an implementation -oriented plan. We will closely coordinate with City Staff and will provide principal -level attention to every step of the process while adhering to the project schedule and budget. De Novo recently worked with Temecula to successfully update your Housing and Safety Elements and we have prepared several CEQA documents as part of our on -call CEQA contract. Our subconsultant team, including Fehr & Peers and Kearns and West, also bring to the table recent local experience to allow us to hit the ground running. Temecula is a unique community with special opportunities and challenges best addressed by a team with experience working in communities facing similar issues. Below is a list of De Novo Planning Group's General Plan Update experi- ence over just the past five years (2020-2025) with identification of our relevant team members. As planning practitioners, we truly see ourselves as your community's "scribes". Every General Plan Update that we un- dertake is specifically tailored to the community we are working in, from developing an appropriate project approach, assembling the best team of subconsultants, listening to and learning from the community, implementing the work plan, and delivering the products. It is our job to guide you and the community through this complicated process while being mindful of local issues, opportunities, and preferences. Sample Relevant Project Experience Brea General Plan and EIR Size (sq mi) 12.1 PopulationJurisdiction 47,325 .. 23,900 ..Members 0.47 DN Campbell General Plan, CAP, and EIR 5.9 40,000 25,000 0.63 DN, F&P Clovis General Plan Update and EIR 25.9 125,000 56,000 0.45 DN, EPS, K&W, JZMK County of Orange General Plan and EIR 792.8 136,000 27,900 0.21 DN, EPS Glendale General Plan and EIR 30.5 203,000 84,000 0.41 DN, EPS Indian Wells General Plan and EIR 14.5 5.400 3,390 0.62 DN, EPS, K&W La Verne General Plan and EIR 8.5 33,000 10,000 0.30 DN, EPS Laguna Niguel General Plan and EIR 14.7 64,000 11,400 0.18 DN, EPS. F&P, K&W, JZMK Lake Forest General Plan and EIR 16.7 77,000 35,000 0.45 DN, EPS, JZMK Lathrop General Plan and EIR 23.0 18,000 6,800 0.37 DN Lawndale General Plan, Hawthorne Specific Plan, and EIR 2.0 33,000 4,300 0.13 DN, EPS Lomita General Plan, EIR, and Rezoning Program 20 20,000 2,750 0.13 DN, EPS, JZMK Manteca General Plan and EIR 20.6 75,000 15,000 0.20 DN, F&P Milpitas General Plan and EIR 13.6 67,000 44,000 0.66 DN Pittsburg General Plan and EIR 19.5 70,000 13,000 0.19 DN Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan, LHMP, EIR and Housing and Safety 12.94 48,000 14,250 0.29 DN* Elements San Jacinto General Plan, Zoning Update, and EIR 26.0 48,000 6,300 0.13 DN, EPS, K&W San Marcos General Plan, Zoning Update, and EIR 24.4 96,000 28,600 0.30 DN, EPS, K&W * General Plan Updated prepared while De Novo Principal Planner Starla Barker was employed at another planning firm. De Novo Planning Group 11 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update OUR COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION When preparing General Plans, our entire team carefully considers how the Vision, Goals, and Policies therein can be implemented by the local agency post -adoption. Our team brings to the table experience working as City staff which gives us special insight into how General Plans are implemented on a day-to-day basis. Additionally, our team has prepared specific plans, financing strategies, and environmental documents for private projects allowing us to see first-hand how the development industry interprets and responds to General Plan direction. To highlight the success of our approach, three General Plans projects and an example of their implementation are provided below. General Plan Considerations Stakeholder engagement Community support Identification of infill opportunities Analysis of market trends Role of technology in planning Target areas for focused City attention and funding Future project streamlining General Plan Considerations Mobile home owner concerns New mixed -use designations Density and intensity PIacemaking/identity Trilingual outreach Unincorporated county islands Traffic mitigation measures Implementation plan General Plan Considerations Open space preservation Agricultural uses Regional transportation General Plan implementation Transit planning Job creation Jobs/housing balance Economic development Implementation The 2040 Lake Forest General Plan has launched several im- plementation actions, including a Neighborhood Improvement Study with funding allocated to implementing local neigh- borhood improvement actions in southwest Lake Forest, new mixed -use zoning, and updated capital improvement plans. Implementation Approved in June 2018, the Bolsa Row project will bring a dynamic, mixed use complex to Little Saigon, implementing the City's new MU -Little Saigon General Plan land use designa- tion. The project includes: 200 apartments, a hotel, a banquet facility, and about 45,000 square feet of retail. Implementation De Novo prepared the City's Pri- ority Area 1 Specific Plan, crafted to facilitate the development of a high -quality jobs center complimented by high density residential development and a transit village, centered around an emerging multi -modal transit station. The foundation for the SP was established in the GPU. --_ Lake ou,Visi n.�OurPl-. Forest 2040 Community Vision January 2019 c www.lakeforesLgen Apia -M c- De Novo Planning Group 12 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update PROJECT TEAM De Novo will be the prime and manage a team with deep experience planning and implementing General Plan Up- dates. Below is a chart outlining key management personnel. For ease of reference, the following pages include brief biographies for key staff, and resumes for all team members are included in Appendix A. AmandaTropiano Starla Barker,AICP Principal I Project Manager Principal Planner I CEQA Project Manager Erik Anderson Megan Thorne Abdul Jama Associate Planner I Assistant PM Senior Urban Designer + Planner Assistant Planner Jason Moody Katy Cole, PE Ian Adam, MESM, CPSWQ, QSD Andrew Watkins Managing Principal Principal, Project Manager Vice President Partner Julie Cooper Jason Pack, TE Sue Williams, PE, MS, QSD/P Katja Martinez Principal Principal -in -Charge Technical Manager Principal/Senior Designer Andrew Williams Jason Scher, EST Cameron Castillo, MURP Tim Haagen Associate Lead Planner, Modeler Stormwater Specialist II Senior Planner Jana Sobhi Planner JennaTourje-Maldonado Jas King Eddie Torres Samantha Murray, MA, RPA Principal & Senior Facilitator Senior Associate Department Manager Cultural Resources Director Danielle Berger Eunice Lee Zhe Chen, MBA Sarah Corder, MFA Director Senior Associate Project Manager Principal Architectural Historian Taylor Funderburk Senior Associate De Novo Planning Group 13 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update PROJECT LEADERSHIP Amanda Tropiano Starla Barker, AICP Principal -in -Charge, De Novo Principal Planner, De Novo With deep professional planning ex- perience in the region, Amanda has successfully managed a wide variety of land use planning projects, all of which have included a robust com- munity engagement program. These projects include General Plan Up- dates for Lake Forest, San Jacinto, San Marcos, Indian Wells, Lawndale, and La Verne and community projects in Irvine, Yorba Linda, Westminster, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Tustin. Amanda is certified by the Interna- tional Association of Public Participa- tion (IAP2). Jason Moody Managing Principal, EPS Jason has extensive experience in the areas of real estate market and finan- cial analysis, socio-economic forecast- ing, regional economics, and corridor revitalization. He regularly works for both public and private sector cli- ents, focusing on the feasibility and economic implications of individual projects as well as larger areas, in- cluding mixed -use districts, corridors, and entire cities. Jason has applied this expertise in numerous land use planning and policy efforts, includ- ing General Plans, Specific Plans, and Master Plans.. Starla Barker, AICP, is a principal plan- ner with De Novo Planning Group whose primary responsibilities are the management and preparation of environmental documents (Initial Studies, Negative Declaration, Envi- ronmental Impact Reports, and En- vironmental Assessments), as well as other planning documents includ- ing General Plans and Specific Plans. With over 17 years of professional planning experience Starla has suc- cessfully managed a wide range of Erik Anderson Assistant PM, Associate Planner Erik has worked on a diverse range of projects for public and private sec- tor clients, with a focus on land -use planning, policy development, and environmental and sustainability planning. Erik provides project sup- port in the preparation of CEQA doc- umentation and long-range planning documents, including General Plans, Housing Elements, Zoning updates, and Local Hazard Mitigation Plans. Erik is passionate about serving com- munities and creating innovative projects with particular emphasis in work through place -based develop - General Plans. ment strategies. Julie Cooper Andrew Williams Principal, EPS Associate, EPS Julie Cooper joined EPS's Los Angeles office in 2018, bringing professional experience in land use, economic, and community development consulting. She has provided strategic planning services for a variety of public, pri- vate, and institutional clients, includ- ing analysis of market and economic conditions, development feasibility and fiscal impact modeling, and pol- icy recommendations. She also has extensive experience in stakeholder and community engagement. Andrew brings academic and pro- fessional experience in economic development, battery supply chain research, and environmental policy. He has provided strategic planning services for a variety of public and private clients as a project manager and technical analyst, including anal- ysis of markets and economic condi- tions and economic and fiscal impact modeling. Beforejoining EPS, Andrew worked in public health, focusing on the social determinants of health in communities across the US. De Novo Planning Group 14 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Jason Pack, PE Katy Cole, PE Ian Adam, MESM, CPSWQ, QSD Principal -in -Charge, Fehr & Peers Principal + PM, Fehr & Peers Vice President, Fuscoe Jason is actively involved in a wide variety of project work but also finds time to lead the firm's research and development efforts in Emergency Evacuation assessment. Jason has an extensive background in travel de- mand forecasting, traffic operations assessment (including micro -simu- lation assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, transit ridership fore- casting, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and CEQA. His focus is to utilize his experience and the technical resources of the compa- ny to help clients answer their tough- est questions related to mobility. Sue Williams, PE, MS, QSD/P Vice President, Fuscoe Susan has 25+ years of experience in the civil engineering field o f water resources for land development and public works. She is a very conscien- tious and responsible Technical Man- ager who acts as a central design team leader. Susan is highly proficient in designing the layout of project drainage facilities using applicable design standards, agency process- ing requirements and client expec- tations. Her specialties include drain- age design (hydrology, hydraulics, stormwater) and preparation of H&H reports (including Drainage Reports, SWDR, WQMP, SWPPR SUSMP) for entitlement and final design and con- struction plans (PS&E). De Novo Planning Group Katy is a principal and registered en- gineer with over 22 years of project management experience, based lo- cally in the Fehr & Peers San Diego office. Katy's professional experience includes managing hundreds of proj- ects across disciplines. Her expertise spans travel demand management plans/quantification, multimodal corridor studies, traffic micro -simu- lation analysis, transportation master planning, parking studies, access and circulation studies, traffic operations analyses, and transportation impact studies. Andrew Watkins Partner, JZMK Andrew Watkins is an architect, urban designer, and planner with over 20 years of professional experience. An- drew is licensed in California and Mas- sachusetts. As a principal at JZMK, his work focuses on large-scale ur- ban design projects that explore the confluence of ecology and urbanism. Andrew has led the design of com- munity plans, urban design and new city planning projects in diverse lo- cales, the United States, China, Indo- nesia, India,South Africa, Botswana, Ethiopia, Germany, Italy, Armenia and Mexico. Ian is Vice President, Specialty Prac- tices and Fuscoe's Stormwater Man- agement team leader. His specialty is water resources, with an emphasis in water quality regulations, sea -level rise policy, Clean Water Act Citizen Suits and resource agency negoti- ation. Since joining Fuscoe in 2001, Ian has served as an effective leader and technical resource for numerous projects and clients. Ian has worked on over 80 General Plan Updates and Specific Plans throughout California. Katja Martinez Principal/Senior Designer, JZMK Katja joined JZMK Partners in 2000 after graduating from the University of Applied Science, Stuttgart, Germa- ny with a Bachelor Degree in Archi- tecture. As a Principal at JZMK, she has lead the Design Team on a variety of major residential projects in Califor- nia, Texas, China and the Middle East. Her innovative designs range from Custom Residences, Recreational Fa- cilities, Resort Clubhouses, Mixed -use Facilities and High-rise Residential Buildings. Katja's diligent, thorough and decisive approach consistently results in meeting or exceeding cli- ent's expectations. 15 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Jenna Tourje-Maldonado Danielle Berger Eddie Torres Principal, Kearns & West Director, Kearns & West Department Manager, MBI Jenna Tourje-Maldonado is a Princi- pal at Kearns & West with 18 years of experience in stakeholder facilitation, public engagement, and planning. She is dedicated to creating healthy, inclusive, and vibrant communities where residents feel a strong connec- tion and have an active role in shaping their future. With a background as an outreach professional, urban planner, and educator, Jenna brings a distinct, informed perspective to each project she leads. Jenna designs outreach processes that foster connections among neighbors and strengthen ties between cities and their commu- nities. Zhe Chen, MBA Project Manager, MBI Ms. Chen is a project manager and senior climate change specialist. She has rich experience in climate action planning, using her technical and analytical skills to provide climate change and environmental due dili- gence services to local governments and regional jurisdictions. She is pro- ficient in utilizing climate change tools to develop GHG inventories and Climate Action Plans (CAP), recom- mending sustainability strategies and programs to local governments, and performing climate risk, vulnerability, and adaptation assessment. Danielle Berger is a senior project manager with 10 years' professional experience as a land use planner spe- cializing in creative public outreach and meeting facilitation. Danielle's approach to outreach focuses on equity and inclusivity and increasing opportunities for engagement and consensus building to meaningfully engage community members in the planning and design process. Dan- ielle has experience working with various Southern California agencies, community -based organizations, and stakeholders to successfully plan and implement a variety of sustainability, planning, and equity -focused pro- grams. Samantha Murray, MA, RPA Director, South Environmental Samantha Murray is the cultural re- sources director and archaeological principal investigator at South En- vironmental with over 18 years' ex- perience in all elements of cultural resources management, including project management, archaeology and architectural history studies, and significance evaluations in consider- ation of the National Register of His- toric Places (NRHP), California Reg- ister of Historical Resources (CRHR), and local -level designation criteria. Mr. Torres leads Michael Baker's ef- forts to be at the forefront of Global Climate Change studies. Mr. Torres has prepared numerous analyses that are consistent with climate change legislation such as Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 97 Executive Order 5-3- 05, and Senate Bill 375. In addition to analyzing climate change impacts, Mr. Torres has led the development of numerous greenhouse gas inventory models which calculate greenhouse gas emissions from such sources as vehicular traffic, stationary sources, electricity consumption, water con- sumption, wastewater treatment, and construction processes. Sarah Corder, MFA Architectural, South Environmental Sarah Corder is the Principal Archi- tectural Historian at South Environ- mental with 20 years' experience in all elements of cultural resources man- agement, including project manage- ment, historic preservation planning, rehabilitation of historic buildings, community engagement, inten- sive -level field investigations, citywide surveys, architectural history studies, and historical significance evalua- tions in consideration of the NRHP, CRHR, and local -level evaluation crite- ria. of Historic Properties (Standards) and local design guidelines. De Novo Planning Group 16 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update PROJECT EXAMPLES AND REFERENCES SELECTED DE NOVO PROJECT EXAMPLES AND REFERENCES Please contact our references to hear first-hand our commitment to our clients and their budgets and schedules. For each project we pursue, we carefully evaluate our staffing resources and availability to ensure that our team can be fully dedicated to the work effort. We completed this level of review and analysis for these projects and are confident that our existing staff have sufficient time to dedicate to the City of Temecula. Project profiles for the references listed below, and other relevant projects, are provided on the following pages. Ii fir,:IL ...... ..... r� 21 morm IL ��. —■1 City of San Jacinto General Plan Update, Housing Element, Zoning, EIR Travis Randal, Assistant City Manager 951-654-7337 x 400 1 trandel@sanjacintoca.gov 595 S. San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583 City of La Verne General Plan Update, Housing Element, and EIR Candice Bowcock, Principal Planner 909-596-8706 1 cbowcock@cityoflaverne.org 3660 D St, La Verne, CA 91750 City of Indian Wells General Plan Update and EIR Chris Freeland, City Manager 760-346-2489 1 cfreeland@indianwells.com 44-950 Eldorado Dr., Indian Wells, CA 92210-7497 City of Lake Forest General Plan Update, EIR, Housing Element, Safety Element Gayle Ackerman, Director of Development Services 949-461-3463 1 GAckerman@lakeforestca.gov 100 Civic Center Dr., Lake Forest, CA 92630 City of San Marcos General Plan Update and EIR Beth Herzog, Administrative Services Manager 760-744-1050 x3280 I bherzog@san-marcos.net 1 Civic Center Drive, San Marcos CA 92069 De Novo Planning Group 17 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, FOCUSED ZONING CODE UPDATE, AND EIR City of San Jacinto De Novo Planning Group led a group of consultants to work with the City of San Jacinto to prepare a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan and the corresponding EIR, as well as a focused update to its Zoning Ordinance, and Cultural Landscape Study. Integrating innovative engagement techniques and creative communication methods are key to this important project in San Jacinto. Like the rest of the Inland Empire, the City of San Jacinto is experiencing changes to who lives, works, and visits the community. Its residents are more diverse than ever; its population is get- ting older, but relatively affordable home prices and new development in the Downtown (spurred by the forthcoming Downtown Specific Plan) will attract new residents to this charming community. People who call San Jacinto home celebrate the City's history and culture and are proud of its special place in the Inland Empire. Building off the excitement of Envision San Jacinto's Go Human event, the City's General Plan Update continued to engage a wide range of community members and key stakeholders through traditional in -person and online outreach strategies. As part of our elevated work program, De Novo prepared a brief 3-minute video celebrating the history of San Jacinto and describing how the City is preparing for its future by updating its General Plan. The team is also meeting with key stakeholders in a series of focus groups to discuss important issues in San Jacinto, including housing opportunities, economic development, cultural and historic resources, and farmworker issues. Kearns & West prepared and released a bilingual direct mailer to every address in San Jacinto; this represented the first time the method was used in San Jacinto, and resulted in the highest levels of engagement the City had ever experienced. Based on information gathered from the community, the team was able to assemble a new land use plan that expands the range of housing and business development opportunities throughout the City. This involved a process of direct property owner engagement, as well as review by the Planning Commission and City Council. De Novo implemented the General Plan through an update to the Zoning Code, including Housing Element Implementation. Date Range: 2018-Ongoing Key Considerations Economic development Climate planning Downtown revitalization Multilingual engagement Use of technology Implementation actions Financing strategy WHAT WE HEARD bee oovooemxmn bee ;� seo xomixc How We Spread the Word • Passbook a W;tn • Nrt 9 0{a • Ne#Doer 4C • Emoib • Direst Mailer C 15,000+ households a.— — Aeq Wen so � n :Fa Wlwt wFrd& "a dcscri(w �% ju ate 1* ZONO? bustling opportunity grural thrivingproduc ive trafficoptionsoutdoor modern home CAA loving walkable laceartmcerC a smallera m centerdow tOWW r r, live cECo m mil n Y o~ �Amainstr etjob � aoshoppingsafe Viewwork arbor -city emetgrowthless tear le°cula E prosperou development De Novo Planning Group 18 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update LA VERNE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, HOUSING ELEMENT, ZONING CODE AND EIR City of La Verne De Novo Planning Group worked with the City of La Verne to update its General Plan Update and prepare the EIR, which was unamimously adopted in early 2025. The La Verne General Plan Update is based on a robust and meaningful engagement process consisting of General Plan Advisory Committee meetings, Visioning Workshops, Community -wide Workshops, a dedicated project website, newsletters, social media advertisements, and surveys. Since the City of La Verne last updated their General Plan in 1998, there have been significant changes to the com- munity that warrant a special look as part of this General Plan Update, including extension of the Gold Line to the community, completion of the 1-210 extension, changes to demographics, and land use questions for the City's Sphere of Influence areas. The La Verne General Plan Website can be viewed at: laverne.generalplan.org. De Novo Planning Group worked with a 15-member General Plan Advisory Committee to develop draft goals and policies for the General Plan Update. The team hosted a series of 10 meetings to cover topics important to the community, including economic development, community health and wellness, land use and urban design, and mobility. The City is also home to a future Gold Line Station (set to open in 2026) and has recently adopted a Spe- cific Plan to guide the growth and development of land uses around the Gold Line Station, which is to be located just outside of Old Town La Verne and the University of La Verne. Working together, these institutions and agencies envision a vibrant shopping, dining, and living experience in Old Town. The General Plan continues to seek ways to support this vision while maintaining the character and quality of the City's established neighborhoods in North La Verne. Date Range: 2017-Ongoing Key Considerations °°°"" """'°`°'°'° Historic preservation ........ Transit -oriented development Corridor planning Economic development Community health Active transportation Land use alternatives Outreach Environmental impacts a wme a m nb°r° 17 De Novo Planning Group 19 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, EIR, HOUSING ELEMENT, AND SAFETY ELEMENT City of Lake Forest De Novo Planning Group prepared the City of Lake Forest General Plan Update. Three years after the City incorpo- rated in 1991, Lake Forest adopted its first General Plan to help guide the City's physical development. Since then, the City has undergone a number of significant changes including the annexations of Portola Hills and Foothill Ranch, the closure of the EI Toro Marine Corps Base, and the launch of the Opportunities Study Area. De Novo served as the Prime Consultant and directly managed a robust community engagement program including one - one -one interviews, community open houses, visioning workshops, General Plan Advisory Committee meetings, online surveys and feedback tools, and social media campaign. The new General Plan is based on the community's vision and values and will guide the long-term growth and development in Lake Forest for the next 20 years. A key component of the work program is establishing a range of contemporary technical studies with updated data on which to base future decisions. The project includes a branding program and outreach materials. Three Visioning Workshops were hosted for the community throughout the summer of 2018 to understand community priorities and values related to a long-term vision statement, land use and community character, and mobility. In particular, the City is looking at how new technologies will impact best planning practices over the life of the General Plan and how to develop a plan, policies, and programs which will respond to new technologies as they emerge. The City also formed a General Plan Advisory Committee which met ten times. De Novo Planning Group served as the Chair of the GPAC and facilitated the conversation with key community members and representatives to ensure that the new General Plan accurately reflects community values. Date Range: 2018-2020 Key Considerations Cohesive community identify Traffic and parking New technologies Regional access and amenities Housing Air quality Outreach to stakeholders Coordination with employers Branding _ Lake Forest 2040 if 1` WORKSHOP #1 Wednesday, May 16th 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Lake Forest Cny Hall 25550 Commementie Dr. Topic: Vision and Values -• I ' 1 t WORKSHOP#2 Wednesday, June 13ft lake 1­1 Cily Hall 6:30 PM to 800 PM 25550 E `I ED Topic:: TranPo,ou nreannd l Mobiy G 1 WORKSHOP#3 Wednesday, July 11th 1 1 1 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Lake Forest City Hall 25550 Commercentm Dr. Topic: Land Use and wWW.[aKeFore9LGoneralPlan.org Community Design 771W., amxe roiest General Plan Ilpda De Novo Planning Group 20 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, FOCUSED ZONING CODE UPDATE, AND EIR City of San Marcos De Novo Planning Group and Kearns & West worked with the City of San Marcos to prepare a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan and the corresponding EIR, as well as a focused update to its Zoning Ordinance. Originally launched in 2019, the project was placed on a brief hold as the City addressed issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Upon the project's relaunch in mid-2021, De Novo and Kearns & West reengaged the public using a mix of traditional in -person events as well as new online tools. This included facilitating General Plan Advisory Committee meetings in -person some months and virtually other months, preparing and distributing bilingual advertisements, sending direct mailers (twice), hosting in -person visioning workshops, and manging multiple online surveys and community briefings. The project team assembled a series of land use alternatives and, in mid-2022, led a transparent public engagement process to solicit feedback on these ideas and develop a proposed land use map for the General Plan. Although this can be a challenging and controversial process, by listening closely to community concerns and property owner requests early -on, the City has the support of the community for these land use alternatives and has confirmed that they repre- sent the vision for the community. Date Range: 2019-Ongoing Key Considerations Economic development Educational institutions Congestion Affordable housing Fire safety Environmental justice Rural history SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE OPEN HOUSE INVITATION pleasejoin us at one of our upcoming open houses on the Land Use Alternatives Report Ito be released In May 20221. Please feel free to o.m. and go anytime during the open house hours. OPEN HOUSE #1 wednesday]une8,2022l5 p.m. San Marcos Senior Center III Richmar Avenue, San Marcos, CA 92069 OPENHOUSE#2 Thursday ]une 9, 202215-7 p.m. San Marcos Community Center 3 Civic Center Drive, San Marcos CA 92069 Op — se tlays.times, and loca[ionsaresubJec[[o change based on public health and safety protocols. Check G eral Plawrg poor to each The City of San Marcos is updating its General Plan, including the General Plan Land Use Map. Based on community input, property requests, and market trends, the City will prepare a series of "lend use alternatives" for public review in May 2022. Upon release of the Land Use Alternatives Report, w rite the unity to provide feedback by attending an in -person open house or completing an online survey. As you evaluate the land use alternatives, consider the following questions: . How should our City plan to accommodate future growth and development? . Doesthe City providea sufficient range fland—opportunities to accommodate residential choices for persons of different Incomes, ages, and needs? . Do our major employmentcentersand businesses have adequate room to grow and expand? . How will changes to the City's Land Use Map impact transportation, utilities, financial stability, and other factors? Porinforma11-1—tthe project,tosign Afore -notifications, and to review work products, please visit Sal n Ma rcos.G enera l Pla n.org SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE What's New Land Use Alternatives Report Paential changes to the City's Land Use Map is a key component of thi s Ge ne dA Plan Update. The Land Use Alternatives RePld, available now, pmWes the City with a tool to examine dill—nt possible approaches to ac mmoda[e luturedevdopment,economic grotWn, mandamfscal surtainability, and ensure adegua. protMion of resources and ope`spLce-Weencou VWutosM1areyour_ Home FAQ Meetings & Events Background Work Product Welcome The Cityof San Marcos is excitedto announce Ihatwe have reported our Comprehensive General Plan Update! The General Plan servesasthe guidingdocumentfor a<hievingthecommunitysvisiorforthef.ture rdthl General Plan UpdMe Drocesswill provide residents and businesses the opportunity to provide inDu[[o M1elp shape the direRion of the City going forward. Incarparared in 1%3, San Marcos isa vibntand omoressiw rommunirv. Sin Marcos nfersa ranceof recmatinn and nnen snare exnedenres s De Novo Planning Group 21 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SELECTED EPS PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES `rFA: Reference: Matthew Taylor, Principal Planner, City of Riverside 951-826-5944 MTaylor(a)riversideca.gov 3900 Main St, Riverside, CA 92522 RIVERSIDE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EPS is engaged as part of a multidisciplinary team to support the General Plan Update for the City of Riverside. As the largest city in the Inland Empire, Riverside is seeing significant investment in housing, employment, and green technology. The City aims to ensure it remains a thriving, sustainable, and inclusive community in the face of continued growth and transformation. Phase I of the General Plan Update began in 2020 and included updates to the Housing and Public Safety Elements, the development of environmen- tal justice policies, and revisions to Title 19 - Zoning of the Riverside Munic- ipal Code. Phase 11, currently underway, presents an opportunity to estab- lish a new set of strategic priorities to guide Riverside's future. As part of the team completing the Phase 11 work, EPS is preparing a baseline analysis of socio-economic, real estate, and fiscal trends; evaluating the fiscal impacts of proposed land use alternatives; and drafting a new Economic and Innovation Development Element that focuses on sustaining a high quality of life for res- idents while advancing employment and revenue -generating opportunities to meet the evolving needs of the City. NAPA DOWNTOWN SP AND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE After decades of gradual decline and lack of investment, the City of Napa sought strategies to help its historic downtown better capitalize on the cache of its location in the heart of the Napa Valley and "wine country." As part of the Downtown Specific Plan, EPS conducted market and feasibility analysis to identify and opportunity sites and develop realistic options to encourage redevelopment of underutilized properties with the goal of creating a more vibrant, mixed -use district. EPS also evaluated financing and implementa- tion options to deliver public infrastructure and amenities. Guided by Specific Plan policies and implementation measures, Napa's Downtown has evolved into a successful visitor destination with new hotels, restaurants, mixed -use residential, and enlivened entertainment venues. Reference: Building on this success, EPS was subsequently retained by the City as part of multidisciplinary team to provide economic analysis in support of the Gen - Michael Walker, ACID,a eral Plan Update. With a growing tourist economy, the City's priorities for the Senior Planner, General Plan had evolved to include opportunities for economic diversifica- City of Napa Planning Department tion, sustaining desirable employment prospects for residents, and strategic 707-257-9345 mwalkerCc)cityofnapa.org redevelopment withing a largely built -out city. EPS completed an economic, City Hall, 955 School Street, demographic, and real estate profile that identified Napa's competitive attri- butes and positioning as well as challenges to sustainable long-term growth Napa, CA 94559 that might be addressed by the General Plan Update. While EPS gave special consideration to retail and visitor serving uses and their continued role in eco- nomic development, the analysis was expanded to include other emerging sectors such as health care and tech. The work culminated in an Econom- ic Development Element with a focus on sustainable and equitable growth strategies to avoid an over reliance on tourism sectors. De Novo Planning Group 22 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SELECTED FEHR & PEERS PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES TEMECULA TRANSPORTATION DISCOVERY Fehr & Peers prepared a detailed transportation existing conditions assess - travel patterns Z� ment and review of the current Circulation Element for the City of Temecula 2s°i a. .. called the Transportation Discovery Project. The purpose of the Transportation �s%,k Discovery Project is to help the City of Temecula develop a General Plan Cir- 34%; z3i° acre a°aatl[3s°i culation Element update strategy to encourage an integrated, multimodal °r °� g transportation system that meets the needs of Temecula. The Transportation d,o12% Discovery project reviews several aspects of transportation mobility along with , ���*��+��.t;,,,,,,,,,; key takeaways and potential updates to consider in the Circulation Element, 23% °(xrorkinS iii;nrrgir,'ii;i;iiii+��+ reaide°Is Gve&work w �"wiii:irii•�i:iiii;iii; ...iii:irir,.......... ,itiiati,city. including regulatory setting, travel characteristics, streets and roadways along ii" •iiinnnmi; . with their functional classifications, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, similar VMT ta°°ighb°nngcifin.1a 89% roadway safety, transit services and facilities, goods movement, parking, and 'II'''' maae.yvaM<la, „^t1VP the future trends of transportation. Additionally, Fehr and Peers performed „o. trail&bik lao°°oetwarkA'dP.id,� travel demand modeling using the RivCOM regional travel demand model to test the congestion benefits of several major roadway projects currently Reference: identified in the Circulation Element such as the Eastern Bypass, Rancho Way Matt Peters, Director of Community Overcrossing, De Portola Road Widening, Diaz Road connection to Murrieta, Development, and several others. City of Temecula, (951) 694-6408, Successes/ Innovations: The Temecula Transportation Discovery project al- matt.peters@temecuIaca.gov lowed testing of several major roadway projects in advance of the Circulation Element allowing for a great base understanding before embarking on the update. The results were also presented in a user friendly graphics heavy ex- ecutive summary PowerPoint presentation. De Novo Planning Group 23 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Fehr & Peers updated the Community Mobility Element of the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The update was based on a comprehen- sive analysis of the existing transportation system serving Rancho Cucamon- ga, including the roadway system, commuter rail service, bus service, pedes- trian facilities, bicycle facilities and collision statistics. The Mobility Element was developed consistent with the identified goals and values derived from the City's public outreach process. Key elements includ- ed capitalizing on the high -capacity transit investments occurring in Rancho Cucamonga (Brightline project to the Rancho Cucamonga Transit Station, tunnel to the Ontario Airport, and future transit connections to the Civic Cen- ter and beyond). In addition to updating the Mobility Element, Fehr & Peers also completed the Reference: Citys Emergency Evacuation study that addressed SIB99 requirements relat- ed to mapping parcels in high -fire severity zones with only one point of access Matt Buris, Deputy City Manager, and addressing AB 747 requirements related to addressing the capacity and (951) 801-5350 viability of the transportation system under a range of evacuation scenarios. Matt.burris@cityofrc.us Successes/ Innovations: Fehr & Peers assisted the City with goals and policies that complement and leverage regional/statewide transit investments such as Brightline and connections to the Ontario Airport. Fehr & Peers provided detailed evacuation analysis to comply with SIB 99 and AB 747. The analysis considered numerous hazards and scenarios. Reference: Jason Geldert, PE, Engineering Manager & Land Development, (760) 814-0229, Jason.Geldert@carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD ON CALL SERVICES AND HOUSING ELEMENT Fehr & Peers has been a partner with the City of Carlsbad on VMT Implemen- tation since 2019. We developed the City's VMT Analysis Guidelines and has worked with the City to further refine the guidelines and offer support related to the SAN DAG travel demand model. Fehr & Peers assisted the City with de- velopment of VMT related screening criteria, thresholds, calculation method- ology, and mitigation options. We utilized the SANDAG travel demand model to produce VMT/capita and VMT/employee maps at a traffic analysis zone geography. We are one of only a few consultants that has access to and can run SANDAG's travel demand model. We also worked with the City to refine the VMT/Capita and VMT/Employee calculations (through a post processing script that utilizes the SANDAG model output) to address external trips and to isolate work related travel. In addition, we review VMT analysis for CEQA documents within the City as an extension of City Staff. We have reviewed over a dozen VMT studies, provided detailed comments, coordinated with project applicants, and attended public hearings to provide testimony on be- half of City staff. In addition, Fehr & Peers prepared the transportation modeling and VMT impact assessment for the City's Housing Element. As part of the project, residential growth citywide was analyzed for VMT impacts and a mitigation measure checklist was created. Successes/ Innovations: Fehr & Peers analyzed VMT for residential growth city- wide to provide the City the option of using CEQA streamlining for future residential projects consistent with the General Plan/Housing Element. . City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SELECTED FUSCOE PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES REFERENCES CITY OF YUCAIPA Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development 34272 Yucaipa Blvd., Yucaipa, CA 92399 909.797.2489 Ext. 261 / bmatlock@yucaipa.org CITY OF LONG BEACH > Christopher Koontz, Deputy Director, Development Services 333 W. Ocean Blvd., 4th Flr, Long Beach, CA 90802 562.570.6288/christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO Matisse Reischl, Assistant City Manager 30448 Rancho Viejo Rd., San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 > 949.443.6315/mreischl@sanjuancapistrano.org fe CITY OF LOMITA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Lomita, CA I De Novo Planning Group for the City of Lomita Through a competitive bidding process, the City of Lomita selected De Novo Planning Group to support its first comprehensive General Plan Update (GPU) since 1998. The GPU will address elements of the City's General Plan, zoning and ordinance maps, objective design and development standards, and related environmental review in conformance with CEQA. As a subconsultant to De Novo Planning Group, Fuscoe Engineering's stormwater management team is providing services to assist with the GPU, including preparing technical studies in supportof the Environmental Impact Report. Our scope includes developing an existing conditions memorandum, 238TH ST & NARBONNE % 240TH ST&PENNSYLVANIA (EMERGENCY.ONLY) - reviewingd land alternatives the In impacts On (EMERGENCYONLY) proposed anuse aernaves ane varying g P l infrastructure, conducting a water supply evaluation, and preparing a CEQA "' r EIR Technical Report. Through our experience providing infrastructure I 2a2ry P support for over 80 EIR, Specific and General Plan projects, our team has \\\ WB.� Hof developed efficiencies and knowledge that make us an ideal project partner. i CONTACT & STATUS Starla Baker, 949.396.8793 I Hari' Completed 2024 � � 151stSE ��� 1h2ntl gl MtldY Plea 2u,tl, til fLLf Legend WELL NO.5 O City Limits7RESER - I 252m St ® ReservoirRESS W8-8 &. j VOIR APPIAN WAY,PS a SupplyWell--'""". E _ ® Interconnection I - PALO$ VERDE Pump Station r: r I I (EMERGENCY PRV Pipeline Diameter H°I r- 11 us 2&4mci— -.,• a 8 inches - P` — 8 inches - �,55 10inches F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G 12 inches 14& 16 inches °'" '� HARBOR HILLS — RESERVOIR son 1, no RESERVOIR Fed tih I.k ii: SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE & SPECIFIC PLAN INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT San Bernardino, CA I PlaceWorks The City of San Bernardino enlisted PlaceWorks to assist in developing a new Specific Plan for its50-acre downtown districtfor inclusion into a new General Plan Update, as well as help with related development code modifications and proper CEQA documentation. As a subconsultant to PlaceWorks, Fuscoe Engineering's stormwater management team provided General Plan Update services consisting of Existing Conditions & Infrastructure Assessment, Existing Infrastructure Documentation, GIS Infrastructure Base Map, Proposed Infrastructure Assessment and Technical Infrastructure Report. Also included in the scope of work was a Specific Plan Infrastructure Report encompassing an Existing Conditions & Infrastructure Assessment, Existing Infrastructure Documentation, Infrastructure & Property Line Map, Opportunities & Con- straints, Proposed Infrastructure Assessment & Stormwater Strategy and Infrastructure Technical Memorandum. CONTACT & STATUS Mark Hoffman, 909.989.4449 Ongoing F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G r CITY OF YUCAIPA WINE COUNTRY SPECIFIC PLAN Yucaipa, CA I PlaceWorks The Fuscoe Engineering team is providing infrastructure support for the Wine Country Specific Plan within the City of Yucaipa. The level of analysis is consistent with a programmatic Specific Plan. SERVICES PROVIDED � Existing Conditions Data Collection � Existing Conditions Infrastructure Exhibit � Hydrology Evaluation a � Water and Sewer Evaluation & Utility Layout � Technical Report CONTACT & STATUS Nicole Vermillion, 774.966.9220 QI (2HCFS) Completed March 2023 Q,A, (7a CFS) rnW sUS1 (2° —^----—S--I ---- p .,Q.M0111) A_ I,•• i Q (65 CFS) * } � QuolAesces} . Q..(1,022 CF5) +�~' ; .. 4 ,00 (1,022 CFS) oo (163 CFS) { Q, 1p71 CFS) QAw 19l9 cps) -� A I . Q'- (1se CFs) ° 40 4 ! Qu9 (23 CFS] ,m (5,071CF5} ! '! I Q—(n CPS) 1 U Q—(95 CFS) 40 Q'``O-Q� 32CF5) tj wl I 43.]I 123.19 1 +,ee I 1 ]99] U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G rew, ns2 2 14AI r"-•- Bxu xceae ,r Burin Ai.e. 15a..]8 95.A Rwii,q C3�]]% AbVLhpl City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SELECTED JZMK PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES CITY REFERENCES KEVIN JACKSON Planning & Building Director City of Piedmont 120 Vista Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 510-420-3039 https://www.piedmont.ca.gov/ GAYLE ACKERMAN Director of Community Development City of Lake Forest 100 Civic Center Drive Lake Forest, CA 92630 949-461-3460 https://www.lakeforestca.gov/ JENNIFER HAGEN Senior Planner, Community Development City of Brentwood 150 City Park Way Brentwood, CA 94513 925-516-5405 https://www.brentwood.ca.gov/ jhagen@brentwood.gov ELAINE LISTER City Manager City of Mission Viejo 200 Civic Center Mission Viejo, CA 92691 949-470-3051 https://www.cityofmissionviejo.org/ government De Novo Planning Group 29 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update LOCATION LOMITA, CALIFORNIA CLIENT CITY OF LOMITA LOMITA GENERAL PLAN AND OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS Multifamily Residential Single Family Residential Privacy Fenced , ti--o-r Single Family Residential Side yard Setback 1 I--0 F Multifamily Residential Side yard Setback 1 f s•-(a Stepback 0 Ground level Screensing Property Boundary PROJECT TYPE GENERAL PLAN AND OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS DATE IN PROGRESS De Novo Planning Group Pri, JZMK provided urban design and planning services in support of the Lomita General Plan. This included planning analysis, land use studies, zoning code modifications and the development of Objective Design Standards (ODS).The ODS establishes an agreed upon level of quality from the City that gives developers clear direction for their development projects. The code include chapters covering site design, building design, architectural styles and landscape. 30 LOCATION LAKE FOREST, CA City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update CLIENT CITY OF LAKE FOREST LAKE FOREST GENERAL PLAN *COMPLETED BY ANDREW WATKINS WHILE A PRINCIPAL AT SWA GROUP PROJECTTYPE GENERAL PLAN PROJECT LEAD DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP AWARDS 2021 APA ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE YEAR REFERENCE GAYLE ACKERMAN DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 949-461-3460 GACKERMAN@LAKEFORESTCA.GOV Urban design and planning services were provided for the City of Lake Forest General Plan Update. Lake Forest was pursuing a modern General Plan that would reflect contemporary community values and priorities — and provide the framework to balance quality of life with improved economic and fiscal conditions. As part of the larger General Plan Land Use Map, five focus areas were identified as potential locations for future growth, to support economic development, maintain fiscal sustainability, and help create activity nodes. De Novo Planning Group 31 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update LOCATION SAN MARCOS, CA CLIENT CITY OF SAN MARCOS SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN r.. J 9 ! N9� & UNIVERSITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE i '\ FOR HEALTH SCIENCES �•� j`g PALOMAR COLLEGE T a// �\ /! • EDWIN AND FRANCES HUNTER ARBORETUM f to AT PALOMAR COLLEGE �! ! SAN MARCOS MIDDLE SCHOOL SUNSET PARK ® I I � �1 I •��` -.WFST!kfsg/p Ro a": •� I i ! �1 1 i l r` �I •NEstsn��--------' ---------- ■ ■ A�: F. e` ► �'�i" . ® yd� Vista o: c T 1 ♦ �r� t 40' 1 ®_ ter— f ■ Rancho Santa Fe *COMPLETED BY ANDREW WATKINS WHILE A PRINCIPAL AT SWA GROUP PROJECT TYPE GENERAL PLAN PROJECT LEAD DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP CA-78 1 .. Rf1Ndlp PgCKPAp PKWY I y g }� CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY StAN MARCOS ,{,F i �� T� Ve. ;sue , a-_,; ' >r ``: y,,.,,-„ x.■R9 The San Marcos General Plan provides contemporary updates on the key topics of land use, equity, housing, economic development, transportation, and parks and recreation. The process is a community -driven effort to ensure the community's needs and objectives are reflected in an update intended to guide development over the next 10 to 20 years. De Novo Planning Group 32 SELECTED KEARNS & WEST PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES Project Examples City of Irvine - General Plan Update Christian Mendez facilitating an interactive land use activity at a workshop for the City of Irvine General Plan Update Marika Poynter, Manager of Planning Services City of Irvine, 1 Civic Center I Irvine, CA 92606 949-724-6000 mpoynter@cityofirvine.org Project: City of Irvine - General Plan Update March 2022 - October 2024 The City of Irvine is preparing a focused update to its General Plan. Irvine 2045 General Plan Update will contain goals and policies to help the City reach its vision ensuring Irvine's high quality of life is preserved and enhanced as the City matures. The City of Irvine is utilizing a community engagement process that will foster community members' and stakeholders' participation in planning for a General Plan reflective of community values and aspirations. Kearns & West is leading engagement for the general plan update, facilitating two series of focus groups, in -person and virtual workshops, developing workshops- in -a -box for staff to lead, and developing outreach and engagement trainings for City staff to build capacity. City of Newport Beach - General Plan Update Jenna Tourje-Maldonado facilitating a community workshop for the City of Newport Beach General Plan Update James Campbell, Deputy Director of Community Development City of Newport Beach, 100 Civic Center Dr, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-644-3210 iampbell@newportbeachca.gov Project: City of Newport Beach - General Plan Update 5eptember2019 - Present In 2019, Newport Beach launched a "Listen & Learn" process to hear from the community to develop a vision for a future General Plan Update. Kearns & West, working closely with city staff and the planning and design consultants, is utilizing a multi -pronged approach of popup outreach, a series of community workshops, digital communication, and web -based engagement opportunities. As the State released RHNA numbers that were significantly higher than previous cycles, the City pivoted its strategy to focus on the Housing and Circulation Element. Residents in Newport Beach were highly engaged, educated, and vocal about the future shape and form of their City. Kearns & West had led a robust community engagement effort with the City for the Housing Element. The team has implemented a series of virtual meetings, stakeholder conversations, surveys and online input tools, and provides insight to the Housing Element Update Advisory Committee. The Housing Element was coordinated closely with the Circulation Element, and Kearns & West manages outreach for both projects to align community engagement objectives and outcomes. In 2023, Newport Beach launched the official General Plan update process, which is influenced by the previous work done during the "Listen & Learn" phase. Kearns & West is continuing to work closely with the city staff, planning and design consultants, and the General Plan Advisory Committee to develop a comprehensive engagement and outreach strategy to inform the community about the general plan update and solicit the community input, vision, and feedback for the General Plan elements. Similar to the "Listen & Learn" phase, engagement will follow a multi -pronged approach, to include pop-up events, go -to meetings, workshops, surveys, open houses, and community partnerships to gather input from a diverse representation of stakeholders. KEARNS t WEST City of San Marcos - General Plan Update Jenna Tourje-Maldonado facilitating a visioning workshop for the City of San Marcos General Plan Update Dahvia Lynch, Development Services Director City of San Marcos, 1 Civic Center Drive, San Marcos, CA 92069 (760) 744-1050 x3281; (760) 560-7730 dlynch@san-marcos.net Project: San Marcos General Plan Update November 2019 to March 2020 When the City launched its General Plan Update in 2019, the Kearns & West team supported and facilitated community outreach as part of the consultant team that included EPS. Kearns & West prepared an effective comprehensive community and stakeholder engagement strategy with special focus on involving Spanish-speaking residents and other communities underrepresented in civic dialogue. The outreach program included launching and facilitating the general plan advisory committee (GPAC) process, facilitating a series of visioning workshops and open houses, and a digital survey. The team conducted weekly internal meetings to review project deliverables and budgets. All deliverables were managed through the Kearns & West QA/QC process before being sent to the client. Kearns & West prepared an effective comprehensive community and stakeholder engagement strategy, provided support on for online content and activities, helped to launch the community advisory committee process, facilitated the first meeting, and conducted a well -received public workshop on goals, needs, and opportunities with nearly 80 participants. KEARNS WEST City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SELECTED MICHAEL BAKER PROJECT PROFILES AND REFERENCES County of Riverside 2025 Climate Action Plan Update I February 2023-Present AmmM John Hildebrand, Planning Director 1:1 Lemon Street 12th Floor,Riverside, CA 92502 • ::: hLildebr@rivco.org Michael Baker in helping the County of Riverside update its CAP in compliance with the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan adopted by the California Air Resources Board in December 2022. This project is a continuous work of the County's 2019 CAP Update, which Zhe Chen served as the Deputy Project Manager and Technical Lead for. The 2025 CAP Update includes updates to the County's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory, the GHG forecasts and reduction targets, and the GHG reduction measures and local actions to help the County achieve the reduction targets. The GHG reduction measures and local actions incorporate the latest local regulations and policies, and take into account feedback from various County departments. The project scope also includes development of CAP Update Consistency Checklists to enable developers to easily understand how to use the plan as a CEQA tiering document and CEQA review to allow the plan to be a qualified GHG reduction plan under CEQA Section 15183.5. Jeffrey King, Director, Climate, Energy, and Air Programs 777 North Capitol St., NE #300, Washington, DC 20002 (202) 962-3238 Michael Baker is providing support to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation, climate adaption, and similar projects from related programs. Specific tasks include GHG inventory development, climate mitigation and energy/sustainability program planning and implementation support, climate vulnerability and risk assessments, and resilience planning, strategy development, and implementation support. Task orders under this contract include Charles County Climate Action Planning, which Michael Baker is leading a multi -firm team developing a CAP for the County that covers both community -wide and internal government operations, with a robust outreach and engagement plan that encompasses survey and website development as well as the planning, facilitation, summarization, and incorporation of feedback received from over 30 meetings (in -person, virtual, and hybrid) throughout project. Michael Baker is also providing support to the City of Laurel to develop a CAP under this contract, which consists of both sustainable organization implementation and sustainable community implementation, and involves identifying, analyzing, prioritizing, developing KPIs, and implementing tracking mechanisms for multi -sector sustainability strategies within city internal operations. Belinda Deines, AICP, Principal Planner 33282 Golden Lantern, Dana Point, CA 92629 (949)248-3570 bdeines c-Oannoint.orq Michael Baker assisted the City of Dana Point with the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Doheny Village Zoning District Update. The purpose and intent of the proposed project is to preserve and enhance the eclectic combination of commercial, light industrial, and residential mixed uses in Doheny Village. The zoning district update provides the following three new zoning districts specific to the project area: Village Commercial/Industrial; Village Commercial/Residential; and Village Main Street. In addition to a Zoning Code Amendment, implementation of the proposed project required a General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to reflect the new land use and zoning district classifications. De Novo Planning Group 36 i TEMECULA • f al r� Yilr; t s TECHNI APPROA TIMELIP PROJECT APPROACH The City of Temecula is seeking a highly qualified con- sultant team to partner with to update its General Plan, prepare a Climate Action Plan, and prepare associated environmental documents. The goal of the General Plan Update is to modernize the document, build off of recent city plans, programs, and research to support a strong quality of life, and proactively address the current chal- lenges and opportunities facing Temecula, including the upcoming 7th Cycle Housing Element. The successful consultant team must be familiar with the unique needs of communities in western Riverside County and communities with similar contexts, and have proven success implementing a mix of innovative and inclusive community outreach methods to maximize meaningful public participation, gain broad community support, and ensure that the General Plan carries forward the vision and values of Temecula residents, businesses, and leadership. As shown throughout this proposal, the De Novo team is exceptionally qualified to undertake this project. The City desires a team to lead and manage all aspects of the General Plan Update, while coordinating with staff (including the City's deesignated Project Manager), the public, Planning Commission, and City Council. The team should be able to complete this comprehensive work ef- fort in an efficient manner (within a 24-month schedule as proposed) and will maintain strict adherence to the project budget. The General Plan will be prepared in ac- cordance with State of California General Plan Guidelines and California Government Code Section 65350 et seq. The project also involves completing related environmen- tal review consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), recommended as a Program Envi- ronmental Impact Report (EIR). A comprehensive General Plan Update —whereby the City updates the entire General Plan at once (minus the Housing Element) and prepares a Program EIR—provides the City with an opportunity to engage residents, busi- nesses, and stakeholders in a robust discussion regarding the community's vision and values. This is a chance for the City to create a Vision Plan and clearly articulate the community's contemporary goals, policies, and desired De Novo Planning Group 39 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update implementation actions. By tackling all topics at once, the City can address critical issues from a broad perspec- tive, realize better public involvement due to increased scope and momentum, achieve full CEQA coverage at once, and benefit from a shorter schedule and reduced costs. Like the rest of western Riverside County, Temecula is experiencing changes to who lives, works, and visits the community. The City plays an important role in the region and is connected (literally and figuratively) to the region through shared history, environment, and infrastructure. The City of Temecula must clearly understand its own is- sues and opportunities, make sure the General Plan artic- ulates the community's vision for the future, and imple- ment the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan to make that vision a reality. At the same time, Temecula must continue to think strategically about its role in the region and how its decisions influence or are impacted by its neighbors, particularly in terms of regional issues like transportation, economic development, sustainabil- ity, and resiliency. A solid General Plan is the bedrock for future growth and development in Temecula and it supports other critical City plans and programs, including specific plans, park planning, fees, and infrastructure master plans. While we believe that the program we have included fully address- es the needs of your community, we welcome the oppor- tunity to refine our approach as needed to ensure that the City's expectations are realized. Temecula is a dynamic and growing community with a strong sense of identity, shaped by its history, family -ori- ented neighborhoods, and economic opportunities. As the city looks ahead through its General Plan update, our team is excited to guide the City through a diligent, effective, and efficient process that results in an imple- mentable set of policy documents rooted in the priorities of residents, businesses, and stakeholders. De Novo Planning Group 40 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update SCOPE OF WORK We have prepared the following work plan in response to the City's Request for Proposals, our experience pre- paring an update to the City's Housing and Safety Ele- ment as well as preparing environmental documents for projects in the City, experience working on other General Plan Update projects throughout California for communities facing similar issues and opportunities as Temecula. We have also placed a special emphasis on creating easy to understand documents and other best planning practices to create time and financial efficien- cies that result in easy -to -understand documents and implementable actions. All work products will be delivered in an electronic for- mat to reduce waste; where hardcopies of products are to be provided, they are specifically identified in the as- sociated task deliverable. TASK 1 PROJECT INITIATION The project will begin with the consultant team provid- ing a high-level project overview and refined timeline at an in -person meeting with City staff, collecting data, analyzing existing conditions, and evaluating opportu- nities and issues. In order to achieve our objectives for Task 2, our experienced team will kick-off and execute a detailed existing conditions study, including preparation of background reports and other documents which will later streamline policy development and environmental review. TASK 13 KICK-OFF MEETING AND TOUR Within two weeks of project commencement, the De Novo team will meet with City staff to kick-off the project and provide a project overview, including a schedule for completion of the project, with clear deadlines and spe- cific action items identified for each task. In addition to refining/confirming the timeline, we anticipate discuss- ing the following: • Confirm/finalize project scope of work and schedule; • City preferences for point of contact, method of communication, meeting and workshop responsibilities; • Discuss community outreach approach, including Visioning Workshops, identification of stakeholders, General Plan Update website, General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), and format for community workshops; and • Data request for relevant background documents (adopted documents, reports, and studies) For this effort to be as successful as possible, we recom- mend representatives from all City departments partici- pate in the kick-off meeting. Following the meeting, the team will take a tour of the City to discuss key issues and opportunities. Task 1.1 Deliverables: • Meeting agenda, data needs list, summary notes, tour photos, project schedule/work plan with major work components and milestones De Novo Planning Group 41 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 1.2 AUDIT OF EXISTING CITY PLANS De Novo will review and evaluate the City's existing plans and use the information gathered through this analysis to inform the General Plan Update project. This will in- clude: 1. Reviewing Temecula's current General Plan in- cluding all its associated elements, organization, goals, policies, and implementation actions. 2. Auditing the City's Specific Plans and Planned Development Overlays. 3. Reviewing other policy documents, including those listed in the RFP. Fehr &Peers will play an important role in this task. F&P has a great start on this task since many of the City's transportation related documents were reviewed and summarized as part of the Transportation Discovery Ex- isting Conditions report, which they authored. F&P will review and refresh the audit of the City's existing city plans. F&P will also do a thorough review of the current General Plan Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Im- plementation Actions and will identify those that may need to be updated or removed based on the transpor- tation system, alignment with current city policies, and transportation best practices. In addition, F&P will pro- vide guidance on incorporating several new transporta- tion related requirements into the General Plan Update including the following: • AB 1358 • SB 932 • SIB 99 • AB 747 • AB 98 F&P will also review the specific plans and planned de- velopment overlays and identify transportation related items that should be included or referenced in the Cir- culation Element. Finally, F&P will review regional transportation planning efforts and documents from WRCOG, Caltrans District 8, and Riverside Transit Agency. F&P will prepare a matrix summarizing the City's trans- portation planning policy and guidance on how to utilize it for the Circulation Element. 1.2 Deliverables: • Memorandum and matrix highlighting existing policy relationships and conflicts and strategies to resolve issues and improve useability of the General Plan and other policy plans. TASK 1.3 SOCIOECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND REAL ESTATE MARKET STUDY EPS will prepare a socioeconomic, demographic, and real estate market conditions study to serve as a baseline profile for the Temecula General Plan Update. Utilizing Costar, ESRI, and other data sources, the study will an- alyze key economic and real estate factors affecting the City and its role in the broader region. The report will analyze supply and demand conditions and trends for a variety of land uses —including retail, hospitality, office, industrial, and residential —in the City. For each land use category and associated market sector, EPS will consider historical trends, recent market activity and performance (including rents and absorption rates), and future growth pressures and opportunities to identify core strengths, emerging niches, and under -served markets. EPS will also conduct a high-level review of the City's tax revenue sources to understand the City's existing tax base and fiscal resilience. Using this analysis, EPS will summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) affect- ing the City's long-term land use and economic devel- opment potential in both the medium and long-term, consistent with the City's goals. 1.3 Deliverables: • Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Real Estate Market Profile (Administrative Draft and Final) De Novo Planning Group 42 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS To prepare a meaningful General Plan, existing condi- tions must be well understood and clearly documented. The Existing Conditions Report (ECR) will be a valuable resource for the General Plan Advisory Committee, City Council, Planning Commission, City staff, and the De Novo team to refer to as goals and policies are developed and the EIR is prepared. While there will be a significant amount of narrative discussion included in the ECR, we will also make extensive use of maps, graphics, and us- er-friendly non -technical terms to help make it accessi- ble to the public. The De Novo team has found that preparing a compre- hensive Existing Conditions Report early in the process provides the entire team clarity on issues facing the City, and fosters a deeper level of understanding of key topics that must be addressed from multiple angles through- out the project. The Existing Conditions Report will ad- dress, at a minimum, the following topics: • Land Use • Mobility • Demographic Trends • Community Character/Urban Design • Market Trends • Historical and Cultural Resources • Community Services and TASK 2 OUTREACH Temecula's population includes long-standing residents who have seen the city evolve, young families investing in the future, and a growing business community that fuels the local economy. There are also those who work in Temecula but live elsewhere, contributing to the city's vibrancy but not always having a clear voice in long-term planning. Effective outreach must acknowledge these distinct perspectives, meeting people where they are — both physically and in terms of their level of engagement with city processes. Our approach will focus on inclusive, activity -based en- gagement that goes beyond traditional public meetings to create interactive and accessible opportunities for in- put. Rather than expecting the community to come to City Hall, we will embed engagement within the places and spaces where people already gather —local events, schools, businesses, and digital platforms. Engagement will prioritize dialogue over one-way communication, allowing residents to share their lived experiences and shape planning decisions in ways that feel tangible and relevant. Facilities This approach also recognizes the importance of cultur- e Environmental ally responsive engagement, ensuring that outreach is Justice accessible to Temecula's diverse population. Strategies • Conservation will include multilingual materials, if desired by the City, • Greenhouse Gas partnerships with trusted local organizations, and a mix and Climate Change of in -person and digital outreach to ensure broad partic- • Hazards, Safety, and ipation. Noise Data collection and analysis for the CAP will occur concurrently with preparation of the ECR to promote consistency. Note that several technical studies will be prepared as part of the project, including reports on transportation, noise, infrastructure, and cultural resourc- es. These reports will inform the ECR and General Plan and are delineated as part of the Environmental Impact Report task. As a separate document, we will prepare a concise Com- munity Profile Summary to highlight the most important issues. This stand-alone summary (which we've prepared for other communities including La Verne, Lake Forest, and Campbell) will be prepared in a magazine format and shared via viewing platform like Blurb or Issue to en- hance the user experience. 1.4 Deliverables: • Administrative Draft Existing Conditions Report, Final Existing Conditions Report (25 copies), Ad- ministrative Draft Executive Summary, Final Ex- ecutive Summary (25 copies) Finally, our engagement will be iterative and transparent, creating a feedback loop so that community members see how their input is reflected in the process. By making engagement engaging, equitable, and impactful, we will build trust and foster a shared vision that reflects Teme- cula's identity and aspirations for the future. De Novo Planning Group 43 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 23 COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM Following the project kick off meeting, the team will pre- pare a Community Outreach Program, which will serve as a guide to the community and stakeholder engagement process modeled after IAP2 values and principles. The Community Outreach Program will include elements necessary for the consultant team and City staff to cre- ate pathways for active public engagement in the Gener- al Plan Update. It will incorporate goals for participation from all segments of the community, stakeholder anal- ysis, a communications plan, programs & activities, roles and responsibilities, and a calendar. For each outreach activity, a schedule, date, target group, purpose, and public participation goal. In addition to outlining meth- ods for how residents will be engaged in the process through workshops, pop -ups, focus groups and digital engagement, the plan will provide recommendations on how the City should structure the Visioning process and how to engage the public on the current General Plan themes. The Community Outreach Program will also in- clude tools and methodology to meaningfully engage underrepresented and non-English speaking commu- nity members. Specifically, that will include the identifi- cation of organizations representing these communities and proposed means for engaging them meaningfully throughout the process. 2.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final Community Outreach Plan TASK 2.2 GRAPHIC IDENTITY TEMPLATE To provide a consistent look and feel for all materials, and to ensure that the GPU process activities are instantly recognizable as such, our team will work with the City to develop a project identity and branding. This includes a set of project logo, phrase, colors, fonts, and layout tem- plates that can be used for slides, presentation boards, handouts and collateral materials, the project website, survey forms, workshop and open house signage, sign in sheets, and other uses where appropriate. During this task, the project team and the City will create a flexible design that can be applied to appropriate materials and products identified in the Community Engagement Plan. 2.2 Deliverables: Project logo/branding design sheet TASK 2.3 DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT Our team is on the cutting edge of designing and im- plementing intuitive, empowering, and engaging collab- orative technologies that help our clients achieve their communications goals by connecting with audiences in innovative ways. Additionally, our approach to digital engagement and the selection and timing of applying specific tools are geared toward reaching all audiences, especially those that have historically not engaged in public planning processes. In other words, our approach reduces barriers to entry in the planning process and al- lows the public to engage at a time and manner that is convenient and accessible. We propose using a suite of strategies to keep the com- munity interested and engaged. While potential options are included below, specific activities and methods will be confirmed through the development of the Commu- nity Outreach Program and may be adapted/altered as the project progresses. Website De Novo will create and manage a dynamic and interac- tive dedicated project website to share information and gather public input (De Novo owns the domain "Gener- alPlan.org" so the project website will be easily identi- fiable, such as "Temecula.GeneralPlan.org"). The website will identify the schedule of upcoming meetings, serve as a library of General Plan documents (including staff reports, meeting agendas and minutes, technical re- ports, and public review drafts), and allow the public an opportunity to participate in polls and comment on the General Plan Update process. Online Surveys Our team has found SurveyMonkey to be a cost-effi- cient yet engaging tool to gather meaningful feedback. Surveys will be conducted in both English and Spanish and will based on the programs and activities defined in the Community Outreach Program. The project team will design two surveys, one during the visioning stage and the other during the alternatives stage. QR codes will be generated for these surveys for utilization in pop- up events and educational materials. Our team has ex- perience with GIS-based mapping survey platforms like Maptionairre and can involve them if the City is looking for placed -based survey feedback for an additional fee. De Novo Planning Group 44 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Virtual Interactive Tools There are a multitude of digital engagement tools we have the capacity to utilize across the various outreach activities outlined above. This includes digital white - boarding tools, such as Miro and Mural, which can be utilized to allow all participants to simultaneously share written feedback in a group discussion. Mobile polling, through platforms like PollEverywhere, can provide an opportunity to engage the full audience at once, re- viewing and presenting results in real-time. Where ap- propriate, results can be tabulated to allow for detailed quantifiable analysis, informing ongoing discussions and decision -making Educational and Engagement Material We will also work with City staff to share all educational and engagement materials, along with project updates, via the City's website, the project website, existing com- munication and stakeholder networks, and social media outlets. The team will develop a flyer for each workshop, email blasts, website content, and a social media plan with sample social media blurbs for the project. Our team will work with City staff to develop shorthand proj- ect updates and educational content in the form of Nex- tdoor posts, Facebook posts, and website updates. Notifications Plan Our team will develop a suite of notification collateral for specific outreach events and the project overall. This can include flyers (digital and print), e-mail blasts, and a social media plan with sample postings. Our team will work with City staff to develop shorthand project updates and educational content in the form of Nextdoor posts, Face - book posts, Instagram posts, and website updates. General Plan Video The way people learn about General Plans has evolved over time and new multimedia engagement programs are more relevant than ever. A picture, or a video, is often worth a thousand words. To help engage the public and educate the community on why the City is updating its General Plan and how it will impact them, we will pre- pare a brief (2-3 minute) General Plan Update overview video. Animated text graphics will help to call -out key ideas and facts. Videos will be formatted for web and internal distribution. 2.3 Deliverables: • Project website development and management • Two online surveys and summary results • Coordination of interactive tools via the project website • One 2-3 minute General Plan Update overview video TASK 2.4 EVERY DOOR DIRECT MAILER To ensure maximum inclusivity in the General Plan Up- date process, we propose preparing and delivering a postcard -sized advertisement to every residential and business address in the City. To maximize the effective- ness of the direct mailer, we recommend that the mailer be prepared and delivered at the very beginning of the project. A bilingual mailer is envisioned to include the following information: • A brief message regarding the project compo- nents and objectives • The specific days, times, locations, and topics for the Visioning Workshops • A link to the project website/contact information The De Novo team will design the mailer and work with a local printer to prepare and deliver the mailers using the USPS Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM) delivery system. Based on USPS records, there are approximately 50,000 residential and business addresses in the City. This task includes preparation, printing, coordination with the USPS EDDM program, and delivery (postage). 2.4 Deliverables: • One postcard -sized direct mailer, two-sided, in black and white; English and Spanish language; approximately 50,000 mailers printed and deliv- ered to every residential and business address in the City We, yWp All At arc of �* famP,❑ The City of San Jacinto is excited to announce that we are What do you low about San Jacinto? updating our General Plan! The General Plan is a roadmap that includes long-term policies to guide San Jacinto for the What Is your vision next 20 years. It addresses a range of significant community for the future of our Cll topics like land use, housing, economic development, transportation, parts and recreation, public safety, and more. What opportunities and cholleagas do you think face San Jacinto as It _- grows over the next 20 years? W.—tto Marhorn sowearn - - chart a path forward for son Jacinto's continued prosperity. — pe•� to diiiiiiiiiis yew Wwa hr �rar.rr�.wtir�r�.e.wwJr..rw.si g g �+il!1si�iL:uluj Thundasn February 21, 2019 Tuesday March 12, =9 Thursday March 28, 2019 6re0-9 pm areas — a pm 6430—gpm Conn, C— carsresagy Cmter conrau s,c «•••••• ECRWSS•• •"'•• fan f PIa,A- ells Fho Aw _s F1ioaw i ?.oral Postal Customer lesiMgGnser fan lodneo,Gp2ew son lmhda, CA 921ee "parlsbr-the, fod•reaa use b.prere 'at ag 9411sNng WaMbp De Novo Planning Group 45 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 2.6 POP-UP EVENTS Popup events are an effective engagement tool for bringing information to community members and ask- ing for their input in an informal setting. They provide the community with the ability to engage and provide feedback on their own terms rather than participating within the confines of a formal workshop. Our team will support City staff develop a strategy for implementing popup events (at least one in each Council District) that align key junctures of the project and highly attended community events. Specifically, this will include develop- ing: • Event -specific materials. • Interactive processes for collecting and docu- menting the public's feedback. • A list of proposed events, such as the Rod Run and Temecula Farmers' Market. • A logistics guide for the events. • Attendance at up to five pop-up events. Prior to the first popup event, Kearns & West will host a training session to brief City staff on the intent of these events, input sought, and roles and responsibilities for staffing the events, among other considerations. This training will allow City staff to navigate popup events confidently, in an informed manner, and collect needed feedback from the community. 2.6 Deliverables: • Preparation of process design and logistics memo, in -person training; Attendance and facil- itation by a facilitator and a support staff mem- ber at training with City staff; Attendance and facilitation by a facilitator and a support staff member at five in -person events TASK 2.5 VISIONING WORKSHOPS AND OPEN HOUSES (8) Our team will host a series of workshops and open hous- es during the General Plan Update process, with the first five workshops occurring as part of an intensive visioning process and subsequent open houses designed to gath- er feedback on draft work products such as the Land Use Alternatives Report and Draft General Plan. All materials will be translated into Spanish and Spanish interpreta- tion services will be provided during the workshops and open houses. Visioning Workshops (5) At the outset of the General Plan Update process, five Visioning Workshops will be held (one in each Coun- cil District). The Visioning Workshops will introduce the community to the project and will focus on: 1) commu- nicating the intent of the project to the public and in- viting public input; 2) identifying the overall vision and core values that will guide the project; and 3) identifying the community priorities, land use, design, and mobility preferences of City residents and stakeholders. Community Open House (3) Our team will host three community open houses to present and solicit feedback on key work products, in- cluding the Land Use Alternatives Report and the Draft General Plan Update. The intent of the Community Open Houses is to highlight the "big ideas" of the Land Use Al- ternatives Report and Draft General Plan, answer any questions the public may have, and take notes on the public's feedback in order to share it with the Planning Commission and City Council as they consider 1) a draft proposed land use map and 2) the project's approval. 2.5 Deliverables: • Facilitation of five (5) Visioning Workshops and three (3) Community Open House, including all handouts, PowerPoint presentations, large -for- mat exhibits, and workshop advertisements, Spanish translation of materials and in -person interpretation De Novo Planning Group 46 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 2.7 GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (6 MEETINGS) We understand that the City intends to assemble a General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) to serve as a sounding board for the General Plan Update. Forming a GPAC is an effective, efficient way to engage a variety of stakeholders. De Novo has experience managing var- ious GPAC compositions and we can work with the City during project kick-off to evaluate how the committee could be appointed and who should be represented. For the GPAC to be an effective advisory body, the City must clearly articulate the committee's charge (their roles and responsibilities). In addition to advising on the committee's formation, our recommendations to the City will also include example charges, and the opportu- nities and challenges that come with different degrees of empowerment and responsibility. It is our recommen- dation that the City will be responsible for managing the committee's appointment and membership, while the consultant team will be responsible for presentations and materials. As specified in the RFP, the De Novo team expects to prepare five special topic white paper which will be pro- vided to the GPAC in advance of each meeting. We ex- pect to prepare a paper to support each of the first five meetings described below. Our initial work plan antic- ipates that the meetings could generally be organized as follows: 1. Vision/Priorities (September 2025) 2. Land Use and Economic Development (October 2025) 3. Mobility (November 2025) 4. Land Use Alternatives (January 2026) 5. Infrastructure and Sustainability (February 2026) 6. Feedback on Draft General Plan (May 2026) As an optional task, De Novo is prepared to facilitate up to two additional GPAC meetings (for a total of eight meetings) without delay to the proposed project sched- ule. 2.7 Deliverables: • Preparation and facilitation of six (6) General Plan Advisory Committee meetings including PowerPoint presentations, large-scale maps, and all meeting materials including topic area white papers for meetings one through five • Optional two (2) additional General Plan Adviso- ry Committee meetings TASK 2.8 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS The team will plan and facilitate up to ten (10) individual/ group stakeholder interviews. It is expected that a repre- sentative from De Novo Planning Group will participate in all interviews, and additional participation from sub - consultants may be appropriate depending on the inter- viewee. These interviews may be conducted virtually (via Zoom/Teams), in -person, or a combination of formats. To the extent possible, in -person interviews should be scheduled on the same day as other in -person activities (i.e., visioning workshops, pop-up events, study sessions). 2.8 Deliverables: • Preparation for and facilitation of up to ten (10) individual/group stakeholder interviews (virtual, in -person, or a combination of formats) TASK 2.9 VISION REPORT The public engagement and visioning process will result in a comprehensive Vision Report that will serve as the foundation for the goals, policies, and actions identified in the General Plan. In the Vision Report, the team will summarize the community engagement program, input received, and outreach outcomes. It will also identify the community's goals and vision for the future as well as specific issue areas that must be carefully addressed in the General Plan and/or Environmental Impact Report. The document will be stylized using the project identity and will be a visually appealing document designed for ease of reading and understanding by the community. It will be in full color and will include pictures of activities conducted. 2.9 Deliverables: • Administrative Draft Vision Plan Document, Fi- nal Vision Plan Document (English and Spanish, 25 copies each) TASK 230 STUDY SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS Throughout the process it will be necessary to provide in- formation and receive feedback from City boards, com- missions, and the City Council, including the Vision Plan and Preferred Land Use Plan. At the conclusion of the project, it will also be necessary to present the updated General Plan, CAP, and EIR to the Planning Commission and City Council for their respective review and approval during a public hearing. 2.10 Deliverables: • Facilitation of up to eight study sessions and/or public hearings with City boards, commissions and/or City Council and up to four public hear- ings with Planning Commission and City Council De Novo Planning Group 47 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 3 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES As described in the Project Understanding, if the City desires to complete the project within two years from kick-off, it is important that we arrive at a preferred land use plan by the end of Q1 2026. This is a relatively ag- gressive timeline and will require a highly efficient and effective process led by a team of subject -area experts. De Novo's extensive experience in preparing and eval- uating land use alternatives best positions the City for success. Once a preferred land use plan is confirmed, the team will move forward expeditiously with the environ- mental review. To facilitate this process, De Novo has pro- posed a strategic alternatives evaluation work program that heavily relies on existing City plans, input from the community through the Visioning Workshops and GPAC meetings, and a collaborative effort working with City staff to quickly and efficiently establish the alternatives. TASK 3.1 ALTERNATIVE PREPARATION AND EVALUATION De Novo will host a collaborative working session with City staff to develop two land use alternatives, plus the baseline condition, based on feedback received from the public and other pertinent market information. This effort will result in three maps and a set of land use defi- nitions to support the maps. The team will prepare a Land Use Alternatives Report to study the alternatives. As part of the Land Use Alternatives Report, the De Novo team will develop population and employment projections based on the reasonable build - out of each alternative. The De Novo team will evaluate the land use alternatives in terms of impacts on an identified set of topics, such as existing/programmed public facili- ties or networks, the natural environment, the economy, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, and City finances. Additionally. F&P will support the Project Team in review- ing land use assumptions, developing land use model in- puts/changes by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ), and running the RIVCOM Model for up to three (3) land use scenarios. It is assumed that land use/socio-economic data (SED) assumptions will be provided at TAZ level by the Project team/City staff for Fehr & Peers to review and incorporate into the model. F&P will utilize the version of the 2045 RIVCOM Model that was developed for the mobility testing in the Trans- portation Discover project. This model version has more roadway network detail than the "off the shelf' version, providing more detailed results. The following metrics will be obtained from the model runs for each land use scenario: • Daily roadway volumes on arterials and collec- tors. • AM and PM peak hour volumes at the 12 study intersections identified in the existing condi- tions analysis. • VMT per service population, VMT/capita, and VMT/employee. • Total VMT, calculated using both boundary method (VMT contained with the City limits) and CAP method (all internal to internal VMT, one-half of external to internal and internal to external VMT, and no external to external VMT). • Average trip length for residential and employ- ment land uses and to the extent possible, av- erage trip length by trip type (home based work and home based other). • Mode share information. The model analysis will be used to determine roadway network needs to support each land use alternative. The roadway needs will be identified based on vehicular con- gestion, complete streets, and other community values identified through outreach and engagement tasks. As part of the Land Use Alternatives Report, the De Novo team and City staff will develop policy options to address identified key assets, issues, and opportunities., which will be more fully developed during preparation of the General Plan Policy Document. The team will present the Land Use Alternatives Report to the public, Planning Commission, and City Council for consideration and feedback. 3.1 Deliverables: • Preparation for and facilitation of working ses- sion with City staff; three land use alternative maps and associated land use designations • Land Use Alternatives Report (Administrative Draft and Final) De Novo Planning Group 48 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 3.2 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS To assist in evaluating the Land Use Alternatives and re- fining a Preferred Alternative, EPS will analyze the fiscal impacts of proposed land use programs (up to four sce- narios provided by De Novo) on General Fund revenues and costs. EPS will employ a planning -level approach, based on an evaluation of the City's budget and esti- mates related to primary revenue generators (for exam- ple, property and sales tax). EPS expects that the City will provide budget documents and any other supporting information regarding the General Fund. For quantify- ing fiscal revenue impacts, EPS will employ a per -cap- ita methodology, supplemented where necessary with a limited case -study approach, to estimate increases in General Fund revenues attributable to new develop- ment. For quantifying public service cost impacts re- sulting from the Proposed Plan, EPS will use an average cost methodology for forecasting increases in service demand and associated expenditures by land use cate- gory. (Note: this analysis will be conducted after program alternatives have been developed). 3.2 Deliverables: • Fiscal Impact Analysis Report (Administrative Draft and Final) TASK 3.3 PREFERRED LAND USE PLAN DE- VELOPMENT The team will present the Land Use Alternatives Report to the public, Planning Commission, and City Council for consideration and feedback. Based on the information and direction received, the team will prepare a Preferred Land Use Plan and conduct the necessary analysis to de- velop a detailed project description for use in the EIR. The De Novo team expects the Preferred Plan to reflect com- ponents of more than one alternative; in other words, it is not likely that an alternative will be "perfect" and select- ed as the Preferred Plan. Once a Preferred Land Use Plan has been defined, final demographic information will be generated and EPS will update the fiscal model to proj- ect the Preferred Plan's net fiscal impacts. 3.3 Deliverables: • Preferred Land Use Plan and associated build - out summary information, fiscal analysis on the Preferred Plan TASK 4 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Our team is committed to providing the City a Gener- al Plan of the highest quality and will actively engage the community to develop a vision for the General Plan, prepare a policy document that reflects the desires of the City, and create measurable implementation actions that are consistent with the City's vision for the future. TASK 4J GENERAL PLAN FRAMEWORK (GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS) This task involves both organizing the structure of the General Plan and developing the goals, policies, and implementation programs (actions), which will become the backbone of the policy document. De Novo's Project Manager —Amanda Tropiano—lead's the firm's policy writing practice and regularly instructs on the mechan- ics of adequate policy writing, ensuring that every word included in the General Plan is meaningful. This includes writing specific, actionable, and measurable implemen- tation programs integrated into the body of each Gener- al Plan element. In preparing the General Plan Update, the De Novo team will prepare each element to ensure that all goals, policies, and actions: • Support the community's vision and values; • Address requirements of State law; • Avoid or mitigate potential environmental im- pacts, or are balanced by social, economic, legal, or other relevant considerations; • Are grounded in recent and sound community planning and conservation trends; and • Are internally consistent. De Novo will integrate the environmental analysis with the development of the goals, policies, and programs. This highly successful approach, tested and proven by the De Novo Principals and numerous satisfied General Plan clients, involves identifying potential environmental im- pacts at the outset of General Plan policy development to ensure that the General Plan is "self -mitigating" and that the EIR does not result in policies and implementation programs that would change the intent of the General Plan. This approach maximizes the use of previously de- veloped information, reducing the overall project budget, and provides consistency between the two documents. 4.1 Deliverables: • Administrative, Screencheck, and Public Review Draft Goals, Policies and Programs for all eight required General Plan Elements and an unlimit- ed number of City -identified optional elements such as, but not limited to, Economic Develop- ment, Community Design, and Public Services and Facilities. De Novo Planning Group 49 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 4.2 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Using the City -approved goals, policies, and programs developed in the prior task, the De Novo team will as- semble the General Plan Policy Document. The docu- ment will conform with all aspects of the California Gen- eral Plan Guidelines and meet all applicable legislative requirements. To streamline the process and create a clear, concise General Plan, we propose to maintain the Existing Con- ditions Report as a separate document that identifies background conditions, allowing the General Plan doc- ument to have a minimum amount of background text. Instead, the document will have a streamlined goal, policy, and program structure that is easy for the reader (whether it be Staff, elected and appointed officials, or the public) to understand. The General Plan will include a liberal use of graphics and visual depictions of informa- tion, including photographs, tables, matrices, drawings, maps, and other graphics to ensure that the document is easy to understand. The General Plan will reflect the City's aspirations for the coming decades and achieve maximum utility. Specifically, JZMK will prepare one ren- dering for up to four opportunity sites to convey possible development outcome and character. These images are a powerful tool to communicate the vision of the Gen- eral Plan. The De Novo team will provide City staff with an Admin- istrative Draft General Plan for review; comments on the Administrative Draft General Plan will be used to create a Screencheck Draft General Plan; comments on the Screencheck Draft General Plan will be used to create a Public Review Draft General Plan. We anticipate meeting with City staff to review comments and reach agreement on how to address potentially conflicting comments. 4.2 Deliverables: • Administrative, Screencheck, and Public Review Draft General Plan Policy Document • Final General Plan (25 hardcopies) All General Plan maps, tables, and images (elec- tronic format including GIS shapefiles of all maps) 4.3 SUMMARY OF ZONING AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATIONS We anticipate that the General Plan will include specif- ic actions directing the City to amend the Zoning Code and Map and/or Specific Plans or Planned Development areas in order to implement the General Plan and create consistency with the Plan goals, policies, and programs. De Novo has recently completed the required zoning code and zoning map amendments to create consis- tency with the recently updated General Plans for oth- er clients in Orange County, including Lake Forest and Westminster, and recently completed the Envision San Jacinto project, which included an update to the Gener- al Plan and concurrent implementation of the General Plan through an update to the Development Code and Zoning Map. Our team will prepare recommendations for these amendments and deliver these recommendations to the City in a summary matrix listing issues that require attention, a list of next steps, and potential map amend- ments. 4.3 Deliverables: Administrative Draft and Final Summary Report of Zon- ing, Specific Plan, and Planned Development Amend- ment Recommendations De Novo Planning Group SO City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 5 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN TASK 5.1 LITERATURE REVIEW OF PLANNING DOCUMENTS AND REGULATIONS As the first step of developing the CAP Update and ob- taining a thorough understanding of the City's climate change efforts, Michael Baker will collect and review the City's existing planning documents, including those completed in the recent past and those still being de- veloped. Michael Baker will review the City's 2022 green- house gas (GHG) emissions inventory prepared in 2024 and the 2022 Western Riverside Council of Governments Subregional Climate Action Plan - City of Temecula. Fehr & Peers will review the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) data used in the inventory. Michael Baker will also summa- rize the applicable Statewide and regional programs and regulations related to GHG emission reduction. These programs and regulations will serve as the basis for GHG emissions assessment. In addition, Michael Baker will collaborate with the City to determine the appropriate role for the City in the CAP development process. TASK 5.2 GHG EMISSIONS FORECAST AND REDUCTION TARGET -SETTING Assembly Bill (AB) 32 established the State's goal of re- ducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. With Senate Bill (SB) 32, the State has committed to reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The latest 2022 Scoping Plan sets a target of reducing anthropogenic emissions to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045 and achieving carbon neutrality by reducing GHGs to meet the anthropogenic emissions target and by expanding actions to capture and store carbon through the State's natural and working lands. In accordance with these reg- ulations and based off of the City's 2022 GHG emissions inventory, Michael Baker will forecast short-term 2030 and long-term 2045 and 2050 GHG emissions under business -as -usual (BAU) conditions and identify all key socioeconomic and other assumptions for the emissions forecasts. The BAU forecasts will be based on historical trends and growth projections, including the City's pro- jected population, number of households, employment, and projected vehicle miles traveled (VMT), consistent with the City's General Plan Update. The VMT data will be prepared by Fehr & Peers using the origin -destination based methodology that accounts for all VMT starting and ending within the City, one-half of VMT starting or ending within the City, and no VMT starting and ending outside of the City. Following the BAU forecasts, Michael Baker will identi- fy the latest applicable Statewide programs and regu- lations and associated potential emission reductions. Michael Baker will then develop Adjusted BAU (ABAU) forecasts by incorporating emission reductions from Statewide programs and regulations. The BAU and ABAU forecasts will be prepared using the ICLEI ClearPath tool, consistent with the City's 2022 GHG emissions inventory, for efficient and effective data management. Michael Baker will identify options for preliminary emis- sions reduction targets that will serve as the basis for evaluating objectives in the CAP to reach these targets. Initial targets will be identified, and a gap analysis will be conducted by comparing the initial targets with the ABAU forecasts. Michael Baker will initiate an iterative process with the City to refine the targets, ensuring that the targets are both ambitious and achievable. Michael Baker will summarize options for different targets and show the resultant reduction amounts required for the City to reach the identified targets. TASK 5.3 GHG EMISSION REDUCTION MEASURES DEVELOPMENT Michael Baker will deliver a comprehensive strategy for reducing GHG emissions through 2050. Our approach will draw on our project team's innovative and diverse ex- perience related to GHG reduction measures, extensive research conducted throughout previous tasks, stake- holder engagement and a collaborative process across the entire project team to identify a diverse range of emission reduction measures. Throughout this process, Michael Baker will actively engage with City staff to dis- cuss our findings and seek alignment with the City's sus- tainability objectives. Furthermore, we will present our findings and actively solicit feedback during outreach activities. Utilizing our in-house expertise in energy engineering, transportation planning, and land use planning, we will proactively identify a range of reduction measures relat- ed to municipal and community operations with an em- phasis on energy and transportation sectors - the two largest contributors of GHG emissions. The energy sector reduction measures will compromise projects to reduce emissions through facility improvements and retrofits, while considering the projected reduction in GHG emis- sions as a result of electricity and natural gas consump- tion. We will outline strategic measures to reduce emis- sions in various land use types across the City. Through our understanding of emissions profiles for different types of community developments, combined with ex- isting land use data for community developments, we De Novo Planning Group 51 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update can establish GHG reduction strategies that could be im- plemented across a range of land use types. Michael Baker will also provide recommendations on and quantify the VMT and GHG emissions reduction po- tential of transportation -related measures with technical guidance from Fehr & Peers, based on the latest Califor- nia Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Re- ductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advanc- ing Health and Equity (December 2021). Reduction measures from other emission sources, in- cluding water, wastewater, and solid waste will also be identified, and the GHG emissions reductions from these measures will be quantified using the methodologies prescribed in the CAPCOA Handbook. The co -benefits of these measures will also be identified. The reduction measures will be summarized in a memorandum and discussed with the City via a virtual meeting. The reduc- tion measures will be integrated into corresponding ele- ments of the City's General Plan Update. TASK 5.4 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND ADAPTATION MEASURES Michael Baker team will analyze climate change related risk and vulnerabilities and identify adaptation measures for each identified risk based on levels of security. Michael Baker will utilize the Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) as a basis for the analysis and build upon an existing risk/vulnerability assessment. It is anticipated that climate risks to be evaluated will include drought, extreme heat, air quality, precipitation, high wind, and wildfire. The primary source is anticipated to include Cal - Adapt tool but will integrate other publicly accessible data sources as applicable. The climate risks will be pre- sented in maps generated using ArcGIS. The vulnerability assessment will also identify and address any projected disproportionate impacts that climate change may have on socially vulnerable populations across the City. Based on the findings of the vulnerability assessment and findings associated with the GHG inventory and fore- casts, Michael Baker will prepare adaptation measures accordingly. Adaptation measures will include commu- nity adaptation measures, as well as those for municipal government operations. Michael Baker will summarize the vulnerability assess- ment and adaptation measures in a memorandum and discuss with the City via a virtual meeting. The adapta- tion measures will be integrated into corresponding ele- ments of the City's General Plan Update. TASK 5.5 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN PREPARATION Once the GHG emission forecasts, targets, reduction measures, and adaptation measures have been identi- fied, Michael Baker will prepare a draft CAP. The CAP will be prepared in a simple, user-friendly style in order to serve as the basis for future policy decisions of the City. The CAP will suggest the type of performance criteria that should be established to help measure progress towards the target reductions. The Draft CAP will make substantial use of graphics, charts, diagrams, and tables to convey key information. Prior to preparing the Draft CAP, Michael Baker will provide a detailed annotated outline of the proposed contents of the CAP for review and approval. The Draft CAP chapters will be provided to the City staff for review prior to publication of the public review draft. Michael Baker assumes a single set of con- solidated staff comments on each chapter of the Draft CAP will be provided. Michael Baker will work with City staff to develop an appropriate distribution list and circu- late the Draft CAP to the public and applicable agencies and interest groups. The Final CAP will consist of an introductory chapter and appropriate revisions to the text based upon comments received on the Draft CAP. Michael Baker will provide a summary characterization of the nature of comments for staff consideration prior to preparing the Final CAP. Michael Baker assumes that no new information will be raised in the comments that require substantive revi- sions to the Draft CAP. If the volume or complexity of the comments requires additional effort, an adjustment to the work plan and budget may be needed. Michael Baker will discuss the findings of the CAP and comments with the City via a virtual meeting. De Novo Planning Group 52 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 5.6 ONGOING MONITORING AND REPORTING The City will monitor the progress of the implementa- tion of the CAP and report the emissions and reduction measures implementation status annually. Michael Bak- er will develop a reporting template in Word for quick and easy generation of the annual report and set up the ICLEI ClearPath tool for the City staff to input the data and generate the emissions summary. Michael Baker will hold a workshop to provide instructions to City staff on how to properly use the reporting template and the ClearPath tool. To educate the public on the CAP implementation prog- ress, Michael Baker will prepare web content for a public facing website, branded, and formatted consistent with the City's guidelines. Content is anticipated to include deliverables produced from this scope of work, including community outreach summaries, GHG inventories, fore- casts, and targets, GHG reduction measures, vulnerabil- ity assessment and adaptation measures, and the Final CAP. Keyweb content will also include messaging on the CAP's purpose, process, and outcomes. The webpage will include a section of the City's annual GHG emissions and measures implementation summary that will be up- dated annually by the City staff. Michael Baker assumes the City webmaster will be responsible for publishing and maintaining the CAP website. This scope excludes Michael Baker producing and hosting a standalone CAP website for the purposes of this work effort. In addition, upon adoption of the CAP and its associat- ed CEQA document, the CAP will become a qualified GHG reduction plan to provide a streamlined review process for proposed new development projects in the City that are subject to discretionary review and trigger environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Michael Baker will develop a CAP Consistency Checklist that contains measures that are required to be implemented on a project -by -project basis to ensure that the specified GHG reduction targets identified in the CAP are achieved. Im- plementation of these measures will ensure that new developments are consistent with the CAP assumptions for relevant reduction measures. The CAP Consistency Checklist will be tailored for each type of development and provide adequate flexibility to the developers, re- ducing administrative burden to City staff. Projects that are consistent with the CAP as determined using this Checklist could rely on the CAP for the impact analysis of GHG emissions, making the CEQA document more le- gally defensible. Michael Baker will hold a workshop to provide instructions to City staff on how to properly use the Checklist. Phase 5 Deliverables: • PowerPoint presentation summarizing the GHG emission inventories, forecasts, and target set- ting. • Memorandum summarizing GHG emissions in- ventories, forecasts, target setting, and reduc- tion measures, including the emissions reduc- tions and co -benefits of each measure. • Memorandum summarizing climate vulnerabili- ty assessment and adaptation measures. • Draft and Final CAP. • ICLEI ClearPath tool set up for annual reporting. • Annual report template in Word. • CAP Consistency Checklist for CEQA in Word. • One (1) workshop to provide instructions to City staff on how to properly use the reporting tem- plate, the ICLEI ClearPath tool, and the CAP Con- sistency Checklist. • Branded website content, including CAP's pur- pose, process, and key findings, and template for future annual reporting. De Novo Planning Group 53 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT De Novo will prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that addresses all potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Up- date work program, inclusive of the Climate Action Plan (CAP), Specific Plan Updates, and Zoning Code Updates. A Program -level EIR is the expected environmental docu- ment for a project of this scale and impact potential and will serve as a "tiering document" to facilitate streamlined environmental review of subsequent development, plan- ning, and infrastructure projects undertaken in the city, which are consistent with the General Plan. 63 EIR NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPINC 6.1.1 Notice of Preparation De Novo will prepare the Notice of Preparation (NOP) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082. The NOP will indicate the City's decision to prepare an EIR; a detailed Initial Study will not be prepared, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060 (d), which states if a lead agency can determine an EIR will be clearly required for a project, the agency may skip further initial review and begin work directly on the EIR. The Draft NOP will be provided to the City for review. De Novo will revise the NOR providing the City with a Sec- ond Draft NOP with revisions in tracked changes for ease of review. Upon acceptance by the City, De Novo will fi- nalize the NOP for public distribution. This task includes filing the NOP with the County Clerk, State Clearinghouse through the CEQA Submit portal, and mailing the NOP to a City -approved distribution list. It is assumed City staff will prepare and publish the newspaper notice. Com- ments received in response to the NOP will be evaluated during the preparation of the EIR. 6.1.2 Scoping Meeting A public scoping meeting is anticipated to be scheduled during the NOP public review period. De Novo will pre- pare presentation materials and facilitate the meeting. The scoping meeting will include an overview of the Gen- eral Plan Update project and the environmental review process, as well as identification of environmental issues that will be addressed in the EIR. After completion of the scoping meeting, De Novo will provide a summary of environmental issues raised. Additional follow-up with agencies, if necessary, will be completed as part of the Administrative Draft EIR preparation. 6.1.3 Native American Consultation De Novo will assist the City with Native American consul- tation as required under both AB 52 and SB 18. De Novo will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request an SB 18 contact list and draft consul- tation letters notifying the Tribes of the project and invite comments and consultation with the City. The letters will be provided to the City for review. De Novo will send the letters via certified mail. De Novo will assist the City in meeting AB 52 require- ments by drafting consultation letters to those Tribes that have previously requested notification from the City regarding projects within the City's jurisdiction and with- in the Tribe's traditional use area. The letters will be pro- vided to the City for review. De Novo will send the letters via certified mail. It is important to note that the consultation required un- der both AB 52 and SB 18 is between Tribes and the City and the City will be responsible for responding to any requests for consultation received from the Tribes. How- ever, De Novo will assist the City with consultation if such consultation is requested. 6.1 Deliverables: • One (1) electronic (Word and PDF) Administrative Draft, Revised Draft, and Final Notice of Preparation • Up to fifty (50) copies of the NOP to agencies/ interested parties on the City's distribution list • Electronic submittal of the NOP to the State Clearinghouse CEQA Submit portal • Filing of the NOP with the County Clerk • Facilitation of one (1) Scoping Meeting and summary notes • One (1) electronic (Word and PDF) Draft and Final AB 52 and SB 18 consultation letters • Final AB 52 and SB 18 consultation letters sent via certified mail 6.2 PREPARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR The Draft EIR will be a Program EIR prepared consistent with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and relevant case law. The Draft EIR will be a readable, useful document that can be used to streamline review of future planning, infrastructure, and development proj- ects that are consistent with the General Plan. We will rely on the content developed for the Existing Conditions Report (ECR) when preparing the Draft EIR. In particular, the Existing Setting and Regulatory Frame- work for each topic area will be discussed in the ECR and then integrated in the Draft EIR as appropriate in Sec - De Novo Planning Group 54 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update tion 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures (described below). This streamlined approach ensures consistency across documents, maintains an ex- peditious project schedule, and reduces costs associated with development of the EIR. The Draft EIR will consist of the sections described be- low. Executive Summary This section will summarize the characteristics of the General Plan Update, describe areas of controversy, and provide a concise summary matrix of the project's en- vironmental impacts and associated mitigation mea- sures as required under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15123. The matrix will also identify proposed General Plan Update policies and actions that provide mitigation of identified environmental impacts. Alternatives to the proposed project will be summarized and the environ- mentally superior alternative will be identified. Section 1: Introduction This section of the Draft EIR will provide an introduction and overview describing the intended use of the EIR and the review and certification process. This section will de- scribe the purpose of the EIR, identify CEQA Guidelines and Public Resources Code requirements for a Program EIR, and describe how the Program EIR can be used to streamline environmental review of subsequent projects. Section 2: Project Description The Project Description will be consistent with the re- quirements of State CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 and will provide a detailed description of the General Plan Update appropriate for the programmatic analysis of en- vironmental impacts. This section will describe project components (e.g., land use map, policies/actions, phas- ing of the project, etc.), development potential associat- ed with implementation of the General Plan Update, and provide clear identification of what would be defined as a "subsequent project" under the General Plan Update. The City's objectives for the project will be described. In addition, graphics illustrating the proposed project, and a description of anticipated actions associated with the project will be provided. The Project Description will support the anticipated development intensity and land uses envisioned for the General Plan Update and will provide flexibility regarding the evaluation of subsequent projects. Section 3: Environmental Setting, Analysis and Impacts, and Mitigation Measures The baseline setting, general assumptions, and environ- mental analysis used in determining the environmental effects of the project will be provided. This chapter will include an introductory section providing details on the "baseline conditions" assumptions for the analysis, land use forecasts for residential and non-residential uses, level of detail of programmatic analysis, consideration of key components of the project (e.g., location of future growth, continued highest and best use of resources, conservation of natural resources, circulation system modifications, risks associated with seismic and soil con- tamination hazards), and definition of the cumulative setting (e.g., geographic extent) and impact analysis. This chapter will also describe how direct and indirect envi- ronmental impacts are addressed associated with imple- mentation of the General Plan Update and the multiple actions that may occur associated with its implementa- tion (e.g., adoption of infrastructure master plans, update of CIPs, public service improvements, zoning ordinance updates). Population, housing units, and non-residential uses, in- cluding employment, will be projected under buildout conditions. The Draft EIR will analyze impacts associated with buildout conditions. This chapter will describe the basis of and approach to the impact analysis in the Draft EIR. The EIR will evaluate each of the following environmen- tal issues in detail, consistent with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines: • Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Energy • Geology/Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation • Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities/Service Systems • Wildfire De Novo Planning Group 55 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update For each issue area, we will discuss in detail the exist- ing setting (based on the information provided in the Existing Conditions Report), regulatory framework, and impacts and proposed General Plan Update policies and actions that will reduce potential impacts. De Novo's ap- proach to General Plan's is to provide a self -mitigating document to the extent possible. If it is determined that mitigation measures beyond the proposed General Plan Update goals and policies may be necessary to reduce impacts, De Novo will work closely with City staff on crafting mitigation measure language and timing that is appropriate for inclusion in the General Plan Update and is suitable for use in the typical development review process. A series of technical studies and analyses will be pre- pared as part of this effort to assess the potential en- vironmental impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update. Our proposal includes the following necessary studies/analyses, which will also sup- port the Existing Conditions Report. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions De Novo will prepare an air quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) analysis as sections within the EIR to support significance determinations. The City is located within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Imple- mentation of the General Plan Update will result in short- term construction -related emissions and long-term op- erational emissions. De Novo will conduct an analysis of potential air quality and GHG emissions based on assess- ment methodologies developed by the SCAQMD and accepted industry standards. The Air Quality and GHG analyses will include the following: • Regional air quality and local air quality will be described. Meteorological conditions that could affect air pollutant dispersal or transport will be described. Applicable air quality regulatory framework, standards, and significance thresh- olds will be discussed. • Short-term (i.e., construction) increases in region- al criteria air pollutants and GHGs will be quan- titatively assessed. The APB -approved California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) emis- sions inventory computer model will be used to estimate regional mobile source and particulate matter emissions associated with the potential construction activities with implementation of the proposed General Plan Update. • Localized construction emissions at sensitive uses for projects envisioned within the Gener- al Plan update will be addressed qualitatively based on the Localized Significance Thresh- olds (LST) developed by the SCAQMD. The LST are used for the assessment of project -level im- pacts where specifics of an individual project are known. • Long-term (operational) increases in regional criteria air pollutants and GHGs will be quanti- tatively assessed for area, mobile, and station- ary sources for the General Plan. The CalEEMod computer model will be used to estimate emis- sions associated with the proposed General Plan Update. • Localized operations phase emissions at sen- sitive uses proximate to the Project site will be qualitative addressed based on the Local- ized Significance Thresholds developed by the SCAQMD and the primary land uses described as part of the General Plan update. • Local mobile -source carbon monoxide (CO) con- centrations will be assessed through a qualita- tive CO screening method detailed in Caltrans' Transportation Project -Level Carbon Monox- ide Protocol. This document found that mobile sources of CO are conducive to the formation of CO hotspots when signalized intersections are expected to operate at unacceptable levels of service (i.e., LOS E or worse). No quantitative anal- ysis of CO hotspots is included in this Proposal due to substantial reductions in CO emissions from vehicle catalytic converters and improved average vehicle fuel economy. • Exposure to odorous or toxic air contaminants will be assessed through a screening method as recommended by the SCAQMD and compli- ance with SCAQMD Rule 402 which prohibits public nuisances. This impact analysis will provide discussions related to assessment methodology, SCAQMD thresholds of signif- icance, a consistency analysis with air quality attainment plans and GHG Climate Action Plans or sustainability measures, cumulative impact analysis, and a discussion of any needed mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts on air quality. De Novo Planning Group 56 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Cultural Resources South Environmental will prepare a Cultural Resources Technical Report to support the ECR and environmental analysis. As part of this work effort, South Environmental will: CHRIS Records Search. Request a California Historical Resources Information Systems (CHRIS) records search of the Planning Area and a 200-foot radius from the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) at San Diego State Uni- versity (SDSU). The purpose of a records search is to iden- tify any previously recorded cultural resources; review historical maps of the city; review the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility and Built Environment Re- source Directory lists; and gather information on ethnog- raphies. In addition, South Environmental will review the lists for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and the lists of California State Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest. Native American Coordination. Contact the California Na- tive American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a review of their Sacred Lands File. The NAHC will determine if any NAHC-listed Native American sacred lands are located within or adjacent to the Planning Area. In addition, the NAHC will provide a list of Native American contacts for the project who should be contacted for additional in- formation. South Environmental will prepare and email a letter to each of the NAHC-listed contacts, requesting that they contact us if they know of any Native American cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the Planning Area. South Environmental will also conduct and document follow-up outreach to non -responsive contacts. This task does not include tribal consultation pursuant to SIB 18 and AB 52 (provided as a separate task). Cultural Resources Technical Report. Prepare a report that includes environmental, cultural, and regulatory settings, and describes the results of the CHRIS records search, NAHC Sacred Land File results, and Native Amer- ican coordination. The report will also provide a brief his- toric context statement and will summarize any areas of known significance for archaeological and historical resources. Finally, the report will provide programmatic mitigation measures/potential policies to conduct cul- tural resources analysis at the project -specific level when discretionary projects are proposed within the Planning Area. Infrastructure Fuscoe Engineering (Fuscoe) will prepare an Infrastruc- ture Report to support the technical analysis included in the environmental document and for inclusion in the ECR. As part of this work effort, Fuscoe will: Existing Conditions Infrastructure Evaluation & Technical Report. Request, obtain and review the most current wet infrastructure CIS data including drainage, water and sewer as well as any associated master plans. Perform outreach to agencies to assist with obtaining data in- cluding City of Temecula Public Works, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Eastern Municipal Water District and Rancho California Water District. Evaluate the existing wet infrastructure systems within the City (storm drain, water and sewer) and master plans to determine overall adequacy to meet the current General Plan build out conditions. Based on information provided by each agency, evaluate the most current Cap- ital Improvement Project (CIP) priorities within the City/ County/EMWD/RCWD for storm drain, water and sewer improvements and summarize recent improvements. Review and evaluate Master Plans of Sewer and Water to determine overall capacity and integrity of the sewer and water systems including any regional studies covering the City. Provide a brief summary of the City's local MS4 program consistent with City-wide General Plan environ- mental goals including hydromodification requirements. Identify infrastructure opportunities and constraints based on the existing conditions analysis and objectives of the GPU land use considerations. Prepare summaries, conclusions and exhibits (GIS-based) for incorporation into the existing conditions component of the EIR. General Plan Update Infrastructure Goals. Policies and Implementation. Assist the Project team with the de- velopment of infrastructure related goals, policies and implementation associated with the General Plan doc- ument. Considerations will include sustainability, water conservation, regional stormwater project, green streets/ complete streets and water supply. All goals and policies identified will be linked to an implementation action. - Proposed Condition Infrastructure Evaluation. Assist with evaluation of land use alternatives (up to 3) by determin- ing water and sewer demands per land use. Upon re- ceipt of the preferred proposed land use and maximum build out conditions, qualitatively evaluate the impact of the full build out conditions associated with the land uses changes on the drainage, water quality, water and sewer system. Evaluate the changes in water and sew- er demands utilizing locally accepted generation factors to identify peak sewer and water demands over existing conditions and current General Plan maximum build out De Novo Planning Group 57 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update conditions. Coordinate with the Public Works/Utilities Department staff within the City to determine if infra- structure improvements are anticipated to support the future land uses including drainage, water, sewer and water quality. Summarize the findings into a technical report including CEQA thresholds analysis for incorpora- tion into the EIR. Project Meetings and Coordination. Participate in team meetings, city meetings and any external agencies if needed. Coordinate with the team, City staff and agency staff to complete the existing condition memorandum and CEQA infrastructure documentation for the project. Budget assumes up to 27 hours of meetings and coor- dination. Noise and Vibration De Novo will prepare an assessment of noise and vibra- tion based on the CEQA Appendix G Checklist questions for noise and vibration as well as the regulations adopted by Temecula within the Municipal Code and policies and goals identified within the existing General Plan Noise Element. To characterize the existing ambient noise environment, we will identify existing noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors. This will include an ambient noise measure- ment program that includes up to ten (10) short-term noise measurements of at least 20 minutes each at var- ious locations within the City to characterize the noise environment within the City. Temporary noise and vibration from the General Plan Update's potential construction activities will be quanti- fied based on noise levels provided in the Federal Tran- sit Administration's Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Noise and vibration exposure levels will be evaluated against significance thresholds adopt- ed either by the lead agency or criterion published by the FTA. Long-term Operations phase noise impacts to local noise sensitive receptors will be assessed for mobile and stationary sources attributable to the proposed General Plan Update. The operations phase of subsequent de- velopment will generate noise by both mobile sources related to vehicle travel onsite and local roadways. Sta- tionary on -site sources and their potential exposure to nearby land uses will also be analyzed. The analysis will compare these impacts against the standards outlined in the General Plan Noise Element and the relevant noise ordinances. Traffic noise contours representing existing and buildout traffic noise modeling results for the plan- ning area will be depicted in graphic form as well as in a numeric table. Vibration exposure related to the operations phase will be evaluated qualitatively due to the absence of vibra- tion intensive sources associated with the General Plan Update. The noise assessment will include summaries of noise terminology, applicable regulations, an overview of the ambient noise environment, and details on any increases in noise levels. Transportation Fehr and Peers (F&P) will support the Program EIR. As part of this work effort, F&P will: • Evaluate VMT impacts using the City's CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines (2020) using the VMT analysis performed as part of the Land Use Alternatives analysis. The impact anal- ysis will study buildout of the updated general plan's land use and roadway network. • Provide guidance to the Project Team on the transportation section of the EIR and respond- ing to comments on the Draft EIR. Note that the City desires a "self -mitigating" document to the extent feasible and identifies their desire to struc- ture the EIR to facilitate streamlining. This is consistent with De Novo's preferred approach to preparing General Plans. Since mitigating VMT impacts is challenging both to implement and to monitor effectiveness of, a signifi- cant VMT impact may be an outcome of the transporta- tion impact analysis for the EIR. F&P will work with the Project Team and City to understand the implications of having a significant and unavoidable VMT impact and how that would affect development in the City and po- tentially help with General Plan streamlining through CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Section 4: Cumulative Impacts De Novo will assess the impacts of General Plan imple- mentation in combination with other known, approved, or reasonably foreseeable development activities in the region. This analysis will be performed consistent with State CEQA Guidelines and be based on local and region- al development forecasts. A table summarizing projected regional growth will be provided. A clear cumulative set- ting for each environmental topic will be described in the Draft EIR. The cumulative analysis will address each topic covered in the environmental analysis (e.g., water supply, traffic, bi- ological resources, etc.) and will identify appropriate miti- gation measures for any significant impacts identified. De Novo Planning Group 58 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update Section 5: Other CEQA Requirements Other topics required by CEQA including significant irre- versible environmental effects, a summary of significant and unavoidable impacts of the project, identification of environmental areas that would have no or less than significant impact, and an evaluation of the project re- lated to each of the mandatory findings of significance identified in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines will be provided. Section 6: Alternatives Analysis De Novo will coordinate with City staff in the develop- ment of up to three alternatives to the proposed project, including the CEQA-required No Project Alternative. The alternatives analysis in the Draft EIR will focus on alter- natives that avoid or minimize environmental effects as compared to the proposed General Plan Update and may result from development of the land use alterna- tives. These alternatives will be described qualitatively and quantitatively and contrasted with the proposed project in terms of the extent that the alternatives can achieve project objectives or reduce adverse impacts. This analysis will be presented in a separate section of the EIR and will include a comparative matrix of the al- ternatives to the proposed project based on the signif- icant environmental effects identified in the Draft EIR. Based on this analysis, the environmentally superior al- ternative will be identified as required by CEQA. Section 7: Report Preparers and References This section will identify all people assisting in the prepa- ration of the EIR and referenced agencies/materials. 6.2 Deliverables: • One (1) electronic copy of the Administrative Draft EIR prepared in Microsoft Word and PDF • One (1) electronic copy of the complete Administrative Draft EIR Appendices 6.3 PREPARATION OF REVISED DRAFT AND DRAFT EIR A Revised (Second) Draft EIR will be provided to City staff with all revisions made in track changes to assist in review of the document. De Novo will respond to a second review of the Draft EIR. Upon approval, De Novo will prepare the Draft EIR for the required 45-day pub- lic review period. In addition, the Notice of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Availability (NOA) will be prepared. This task includes filing the NOA with the County Clerk and submitting the NOC, Draft EIR, and Appendices to the State Clearinghouse through the CEQA Submit por- tal. De Novo will mail the NOA/NOC to the City -approved Distribution List. It is assumed City staff will prepare and publish the newspaper notice. Our budget includes the County Clerk filing fee. 6.3 Deliverables: • One (1) electronic copy of the Revised (Second) Administrative Draft with incorporation of City comments in track changes • One (1) electronic copy of the complete Revised (Second) Administrative Draft EIR Appendices • One (1) electronic copy of the Public Review Draft EIR prepared in Microsoft Word and Exhibits (jpeg or pdf file format, as requested by City staff) • Three (3) bound hardcopies of the Public Review Draft EIR (with Draft document and Technical Appendices on USBs provided with each hardcopy) • One (1) electronic copy of the Notice of Availability (NOA) • Up to fifty (50) copies of the NOA sent to the City's distribution list • Electronic submittal of the Public Review Draft EIR and Technical Appendices, NOC, and NOA to the State Clearinghouse CEQA Submit portal • Filing of NOA with the County Clerk De Novo Planning Group 59 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update 6.4 FINAL EIR AND MMRP At the conclusion of the Draft EIR public review period, the De Novo team will respond to written comments re- ceived by the City. Upon completion, copies of the Ad- ministrative Final EIR will be forwarded to the City for review. The Final EIR document, which will be separately bound, will include the comment letters, responses, re- visions, or Errata to the Draft (text to be revised will be shown as an excerpt demarcated with underline for new text and strikethrough for deleted text), and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), if required. At this time, the extent of public and agency comments that will result from the review process is unknown. This task assumes a maximum budget of staff time for the preparation of responses by the De Novo team. Should the level of comments and responses exceed our bud- geted estimate, De Novo will submit additional funding requests to the City. The scope of work does not assume supplemental technical studies or extensive additional analysis will be required to provide responses to com- ments. If it is determined that supplemental technical studies or additional analysis are needed, De Novo will work with the City to determine the associated scope of work and additional funding necessary. We assume one round of City review of the Administra- tive Final EIR and one round of City review of the Revised (Screencheck) Final EIR prior to public release. A MMRP will also be prepared to identify appropriate monitoring steps/procedures and provide a basis for monitoring mitigation measures during and upon proj- ect implementation, if required. The Mitigation Monitor- ing and Reporting Checklist will serve as the foundation of the MMRP. The Checklist will identify the mitigation measure outlined in the EIR, the Monitoring Milestone (what agency/department is responsible for verifying implementation of the measure), Method of Verification (documentation, field checks, etc.), and a verification sec- tion for the initials of the verifying individual, date of ver- ification, and pertinent remarks. A Draft MMRP will be prepared for review by City staff. CEQA Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Consid- erations (Findings) will be prepared that identify each potentially significant and significant impact, describe mitigation for the impact, and the resultant level of sig- nificance after mitigation. The Findings will identify each alternative and, if the alternative was not selected as the proposed project, identify why the alternative was not feasible, and considerations for not selecting the alter- native. For each significant and unavoidable impact, the Findings will identify economic, legal, social, technical, or other defensible reasons why the project should be ap- proved despite the significant effects of the project. 6.4 Deliverables: • One (1) electronic copy of the Administrative Draft, Revised (Second) Administrative Draft, and Final Responses to Comments • One (1) electronic copy of the Administrative Draft, Revised (Second) Administrative Draft, and Final MMRP • One (1) electronic copy and three (3) hardcopies of the Final EIR (Final Responses to Comments, Errata, and MMRP, if necessary) • One (1) electronic copy of the Draft and Final Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations (if necessary) TASK 6.5 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION De Novo will prepare and file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse within five days of EIR certification and project approval. Our budget includes the filing fees for the County Clerk; however, any applicable California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) fees are excluded. 6.5 Deliverables: • One (1) electronic copy of the Notice of Determination • Filing of the NOD with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse De Novo Planning Group 60 City of Temecula Comprehensive General Plan Update TASK 7 PROJECT MANAGEMENT De Novo will serve as the Prime Consultant and manage all regular communications with the City of Temecula, presentations to community, boards, and commissions including the Planning Commission and City Council, and overall project management and adherence to the project schedule and budget. De Novo Principal Aman- da Tropiano will serve as the Project Manager for this as- signment. As the Project Manager for the City's recent Housing Element and Safety Element Updates, Amanda is deeply experienced working collaboratively with City Staff to successfully resolve complex planning challeng- es on -time and on -budget and will carry that experience into the General Plan. TASK 7.1 MEETINGS WITH CITY STAFF De Novo will facilitate twice monthly virtual meetings with City staff (via Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, or other app) to ensure that the project is on time, on budget, and that any issues are quickly resolved. These meetings are in addition to other outreach programs identified in Task 2. 7.1 Deliverables: • Twice monthly virtual meetings with City staff TASK 7.2 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION As described previously in this proposal, our strategy includes a dedicated project manager and assistant project manager who will be hands-on throughout the project. Our internal administration procedures include: regular check -ins with subconsultant teams; internal weekly conference calls with the management team from De Novo and each subconsultant (as relevant to the timing of the task of each subconsultant); weekly up- dates to the task list, including internal deliverables nec- essary to meet our deliverables to the City; and establish- ment of a secure online file sharing site to ensure that all background documents, technical reports, updated schedules, and approach memos are readily available to each team member. 7.2 Deliverables: OPTIONAL TASK: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OP.1 GROWTH AND SERVICES ASSUMPTIONS EPS will work with City staff to review the services to be provided to the annexation areas ("Services Plan"), ser- vice standards, additional staff and expenditure require- ments (or a methodology to estimate future needs) for the annexation area, and costs per staff or other met- rics. The assumptions for expenditure assumptions will leverage EPS's evaluation of the City budget completed in the Fiscal Impact Analysis of Land Use Alternatives. Cost inflators applicable to future costs will also be dis- cussed and documented. The Services Plan and the cost assumptions and methods will provide the basis for es- timating future cost. Additionally, EPS will consult with City staff and the Consultant Team to develop a forecast of future growth in the SOI areas. This effort may include discussions with staff from specific departments repre- senting major service providers to the SOI areas. OP.2 FISCAL ANALYSIS EPS will utilize the Services Plan, service standards, and growth projections developed in Subtask 4.1 to both es- timate the costs and potential revenues to the City asso- ciated with existing and future development in the SOI areas. This analysis will build on the model developed in EPS's Fiscal Impact Analysis of Land Use Alternatives, as well as incorporate any need to increase various ad- ministrative and overhead expenditures and set -asides for reserves and contingencies identified by City staff. A comparison of annual revenues to annual operating ex- penditures will indicate the potential magnitude of fiscal impacts of annexation. If any fiscal shortfalls are detect- ed, mitigation measures will be recommended. For the purposes of this analysis, EPS will not evaluate the magnitude of revenues that would shift from the County to the City under an annexation negotiation. This evaluation would be required by the Local Agency For- mation Commission (LAFCO) in the course of the annex- ation approval process, and can be added via a scope and budget amendment if desired by the City. • Ongoing project administration led by the Proj OP Deliverables: ect Manager and Assistant -Project Manager • Technical memorandum summarizing the fiscal impact results and documenting methodology, assumptions, and calculations. De Novo Planning Group 61 SCHEDULE Our team recognizes that the City desires to complete the project within 24 months and we have a provided a schedule con- sistent with that timeline, as shown below. This schedule is relatively aggressive; in practice, General Plan Updates typically take between 30-36 months from kickoff to adoption. To meet the requested 24 month schedule, we must arrive at a preferred land use map by the end of the first year of the work program, leaving the second year for preparation of the policy and environmen- tal documents, facilitation of public review, and the required series of public hearings. This schedule will require close coordina- tion with Staff to ensure timely preparation and review of material. De Novo recently lead a multidisciplinary project team in the City of Lomita to complete a comprehensive General Plan Update and RNHA rezoning program in 18 months. Working together with Staff, we are confident we can accomplish this schedule for the City. De Novo Planning Group 2025 2026 Temecula General Plan Update Schedule May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 2027 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION 1.1: Kick-off Meeting and Tour 1.2: Audit of Existing City Plans ---------------------------------------------- 13: Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Market Study 1.4: Existing Conditions Report ----------------------------------------------- TASK 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLIC OUTREACH Community Outreach Program 2.2: Graphic Identity Template 2.3: Digital Engagement 2.4: Direct Mailer 2.5: Visioning Workshops and Open Houses 2.6: Pop-up Events Committee2.1: 2.7: General Plan Advisory ----------------------------------------------- 2.8: Stakeholder Interviews ----------------------------------------------- 2.9: Vision Document 2.10: Study Sessions and Public Hearings TASK 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 3.1: Alternative Preparation and Evaluation cal Impact Analysis 3.3 Preferred Land Use Plan Development TASK 4: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 4.1: Framework (Goals, Policies, and Programs) 4.2: General Plan Update ---------------------------------------------- 4.3. Summary ofZoning and Specific Plan Recommendations TASK 5: CLIMATE • Literature Review of Planning Documents and Regulations Forecast5.1: -duction Target-Setting5.3: ----------------------------------------------- GHG Emission Reduction Measures Development Vulnerability-ssment and Adaptation Measures5.5: ----------------------------------------------- Climate Action Plan Preparation 5.6: Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting TASK 6: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & CEQA DOCUMENTS 6.1: EIR Notice of Preparation and Scoping 6.1.1: Notice of Prepa ration -- ----------------------------------------------- 6.13: Native American Consultation 6.2: Preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR 6.3: Preparation of the Revised Draft and Draft EIR 5.4: Final Environmental Impact Report ----------------------------------------------- 6.5: Notice of Determination 7.1: Meetings with City Staff 7.2: Project Administration •• • PF OPA: 501 Economic Analysis OP.2: Two Additional GPAC Meetings (Scheduled as Needed) Consultant Team Work Milestone Staff Review -Critical Path Study Session/Public Hearing De Novo Planning Group 62 PRIC TASK/ACTIVITY Principal/ Project Manager Principal Planner Senior Planner+ Urban Designer Associate Planner/ Assistant PM Assistant Planner/ GIS De Novo Subtotals Traffic Design CAP Economics Outreach Cultural I Infrastructure Direct Costs ACTIVITY TOTALS Fehr & Peers JZMK Partners Michael Baker International EPS Kearns & West Environmental South Fuscoe Printin g/ Mailing/ Translation TOTALS Hours $185 Hours $160 Hours $125 Hours $115 Hours $100 Hours Fee Fee TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION 1.1: Kick-off Meeting and Tour 8 $1,480 8 $1,280 8 $1,000 8 $920 0 $0 32 $4,680 $2,840 $7,520 1.2: Audit of Existing City Plans 16 $2,960 24 $3,840 0 $0 40 $4,600 60 $6,000 140 $17,400 $10,030 $10,000 $37,430 1.3: Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Market Study 12 $2,220 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,220 $35,000 $37,220 1.4: Existing Conditions Report 60 $11,100 24 $3,840 100 $12,500 160 $18,400 280 $28,000 624 $73,840 $39,510 $20,000 $18,317 $151,667 TASK 1 SUBTOTAL 96 $17,760 56 $8,960 108 $13,500 208 $23,920 340 $34,000 808 $98,140 $52,380 $30,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $18,317 $0 $233,837 TASK 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLIC OUTREACH 2.1: Community Outreach Program 8 $1,480 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 $1,480 $7,130 $8,610 2.2: Graphic Identity Template 20 $3,700 0 $0 40 $5,000 0 $0 0 $0 60 $8,700 $5,715 $14,415 2.3: Digital Engagement 40 $7,400 0 $0 100 $12,500 24 $2,760 0 $0 164 $22,660 $5,198 $30,120 $1,500 $59,478 2.4: Direct Mailer 6 $1,110 0 $0 24 $3,000 0 $0 0 $0 30 $4,110 $17,000 $21,110 2.5: Visioning Workshops and Open Houses 40 $7,400 0 $0 0 $0 64 $7,360 64 $6,400 168 $21,160 $2,950 $20,000 $8,338 $72,273 $8,000 $132,721 2.6: Pop-up Events 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 20 $2,300 0 $0 20 $2,300 $5,040 $1,000 $8,340 2.7: General Plan Advisory Committee 48 $8,880 16 $2,560 16 $2,000 80 $9,200 60 $6,000 220 $28,640 $13,110 $8,370 $1,200 $51,320 2.8: Stakeholder Interviews 22 $4,070 4 $640 0 $0 22 $2,530 0 $0 48 $7,240 $7,240 2.9: Vision Document 24 $4,440 0 $0 60 $7,500 0 $0 0 $0 84 $11,940 $1,950 $1,100 $14,990 2.10: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 100 $18,500 40 $6,400 0 $0 100 $11,500 0 $0 240 $36,400 $11,760 $20,000 $14,088 $11,700 $93,948 TASK 2 SUBTOTAL 308 $56,980 60 $9,600 240 $30,000 310 $35,650 124 $12,400 1042 $144,630 $29,770 $40,000 $27,624 $11,700 $128,648 $0 $0 $29,800 $412,172 TASK 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 3.1: Alternative Preparation and Evaluation 40 $7,400 16 $2,560 60 $7,500 100 $11,500 80 $8,000 296 $36,960 $36,200 $40,000 1 1 1 $113,160 3.2: Fiscal Impact Analysis 16 $2,960 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 16 $2,960 $17,460 $20,420 3.3 Preferred Land Use Plan Development 24 $4,440 8 $1,280 16 $2,000 24 $2,760 40 $4,000 112 $14,480 $14,480 TASK 3 SUBTOTAL 80 $14,800 24 $3,840 76 $9,500 124 $14,260 120 $12,000 424 $54,400 $36,200 $40,000 $0 $17,460 $0 $0 $0 $0 $148,060 TASK 4: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 4.1: Framework (Goals, Policies, and Programs) 100 $18,500 60 $9,600 80 $10,000 260 $29,900 100 $10,000 600 $78,000 $6,000 $15,960 $3,720 $103,680 4.2: General Plan Update 60 $11,100 40 $6,400 120 $15,000 80 $9,200 120 $12,000 420 $53,700 $49,720 $60,000 $5,000 $168,420 4.3: Summary of Zoning and Specific Plan Recommendations 24 $4,440 36 $5,760 60 $7,500 80 $9,200 0 $0 200 $26,900 $2,180 $30,000 $59,080 TASK 4 SUBTOTAL 184 $34,040 136 $21,760 260 $32,500 420 $48,300 220 $22,000 1220 $158,600 $57,900 $90,000 $0 $15,960 $0 $0 $3,720 $5,000 $331,180 TASK 5: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 5.1: Literature Review of Planning Documents and Regulations 2 $370 4 $640 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,010 $5,952 $6,962 5.2: GHG Emissions Forecast and Reduction Target -Setting 6 $1,110 12 $1,920 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $3,030 $5,4201 $8,794 $17,244 5.3: GHG Emission Reduction Measures Development 6 $1,110 12 $1,920 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 18 $3,030 $4,070 $18,250 7 $25,350 5.4: Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Measures 4 $740 8 $1,280 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,020 $17,152 $19,172 5.5: Climate Action Plan Preparation 4 $740 8 $1,280 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,020 $19,928 $21,948 5.6: Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting 0 $0 2 $320 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 $320 $15,6401 $15,960 TASK 5 SUBTOTALI 22 $4,070 46 $7,360 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 s0 $11,430 $9,490 $0 $85,716 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,636 TASK 6: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & CECW DOCUMENTS or 6.1: EIR Notice of Preparation and Scoping 6.1.1: Notice of Preparation 4 $740 12 $1,920 20 $2,500 16 $1,840 16 $1,600 68 $8,600 $500 $9,100 6.1.2: Scoping Meeting $0 12 $1,920 12 $1,500 8 $920 2 $200 34 $4,540 $250 $4,790 6.1.3: Native American Consultation $0 8 $1,280 8 $1,000 $0 8 $800 24 $3,080 $150 $3,230 6.2: Preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR 80 $14,800 300 $48,000 360 $45,000 280 $32,200 260 $26,000 1280 $166,000 $10,310 $15,575 $20,414 $212,299 6.3: Preparation of the Revised Draft and Draft EIR 60 $11,100 150 $24,000 180 $22,500 140 $16,100 140 $14,000 670 $87,700 $1,500 $89,200 6.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 40 $7,400 40 $6,400 401 5,000 32 $3,680 32 $3,200 184 $25,680 $5001 $26,180 6.5: Notice of Determination 1 $0 2 $320 1 $0 $0 2 $200 4 $520 1 1 $50 $570 TASK 6 SUBTOTAL 184 $34,040 524 $83,840 620 $77,500 476 $54,740 460 $46,000 2264 $296,120 $10,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,575 $20,414 $2,9501 $345,369 TASK 7: PROJECT MANAGEMENT 7.1: Meetings with City Staff 100 $18,500 40 $6,400 40 $5,000 100 $11,500 0 $0 280 $41,400 $41,400 7.2: Project Administration 48 $8,880 48 $7,680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 96 $16,560 $27,712 $16,4161 $47,965 $7,060 $115,713 TASK 7 SUBTOTAL 148 $27,380 88 $14,0801 40 $5,000 100 $11,500 0 $0 376 $57,960 $27,712 $0 $16,4161 $0 $47,965 $0 $7,060 $0 $157,113 Subtotals 1,022 $ 189,070 934 $ 149,440 1,344 $ 168,000 1,638 $ 188,370 1,264 $ 126,400 6,184 FEE (NOT TO 1' • TOTAL• • EXCEED, WITH CONTINGENCY)1 $ 821,280 $ 223,762 $ 200,000 $ 129,756 $ 80,120 $ 176,613 $ 15,575 $ 49,511 $ 37,750 $ 1,734,367 :14 TASK/ACTIVITY Principal/ Project Manager Principal Planner Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner/ GIS De Novo Subtotals Traffic Design CAP Economics Outreach Cultural Infrastructure Direct Costs ACTIVITY TOTALS Fehr & Peers JZMK Partners Michael Baker International EPS Kearns & West South Environmental Fuscoe Printin g/ Mailing/ Translation TOTALS Hours $185 Hours $160 Hours $125 Hours $115 Hours $100 Hours Fee Fee OPA: Sol Economic Analysis 1 12 $2,220 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 0 $2,2201 1 1 1 $11,7001 1 1 $13,920 OP.2: Two Additional GPAC Meetings 116 $2,9601 01 Sol 8 $1,000 40 $4,600 0 $01 0 $8,5601 1 1 1 1 1 1 1$8,560 De Novo hourly rates represent fully burdened rates. Subconsultants and Direct Costs are billed at no markup. De Novo Planning Group reserves the right to reallocate budget between various consulting team members and between tasks, provided the overall project budget does not change. De Novo Planning Group 64 Ink RESU EDUCATION MA, Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine BA, Urban Studies and Planning, University of California, San Diego BA, Political Science: Comparative Politics, University of California, San Diego Study Abroad Program, University of Sussex ORGANIZATIONS Urban Land Institute International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) American Planning Association Amanda Tropiano PRINCIPAL Amanda Tropiano is responsible for leading the firm's Southern California practice. Amanda has successfully managed a wide variety of land use and environmental planning projects for public and private sector clients, including numerous General Plans, specific plans, corridor plans, strategic plans, sustainability programs, visioning projects, transit -oriented development plans, zoning documents, outreach programs, and CEQA projects. Amanda is also an IAP2 trained public outreach practitioner and has completed project management training with PSMJ. Amanda consistently brings to the table her passion, creativity, and strategic thinking to make sure every project exceeds her client's expectations. Amanda brings a unique project management style to her clients, where she relies on collaboration, communication, and creativity to identify and proactively address potential opportunities and challenges. She is a skilled public speaker and enjoys working with members of the public, stakeholders, and elected and appointed officials throughout the planning process. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Focus General Plan Update, Brea Core Specific Plan, and EIR, City of Brea General Plan Update and EIR, City of Lake Forest General Plan Update and EIR, City of Laguna Niguel General Plan Update, Rezoning, ODS, and EIR, City of Lomita General Plan Update, Hawthorne Blvd Specific Plan Update, and EIR, City of Lawndale General Plan Update and EIR, County of Orange General Plan Update and EIR, City of La Verne General Plan Update and EIR, City of San Jacinto General Plan Update and EIR, City of Indian Wells Housing Element Updates, Cities of Avalon, Hawthorne, Indian Wells, Glendale, La Verne, Lake Forest, Lawndale, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, San Jacinto, San Marcos, Stanton, Temecula Housing Element, Rezoning Program, ODS, and CEQA Compliance, City of Laguna Hills Housing Element Update, Comprehensive Zoning Code, Mixed - Use Implementation Program, City of Westminster Comprehensive Development Code Update, City of Laguna Beach Environmental Justice Element, City of Goleta Objective Design Standards, City of Palos Verdes Estates Springs Specific Plan and EIR, Sonoma County General Plan Update, Zoning Update, Irvine Neighborhood Plan, and EIR, City of Irvine City of San Marcos 1300 Bristol Mixed -Income Project, Focus General Plan Update and EIR, City of Newport Beach City of Glendale De Novo Planning Group ■ ■ ■ ■ A Land Ilse Planning, Design, and F.nvirannental Firm EDUCATION Masters, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona BA, Business Economics, University of California, Riverside ORGANIZATIONS American Planning Association LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS American institute of Certified Planners, 2009, No. 024079 Starla Barker, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER Starla Barker, AICP, is a principal planner with De Novo Planning Group whose primary responsibilities are the management and preparation of environmental documents (Initial Studies, Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Reports, and Environmental Assessments), as well as other planning documents including General Plans and Specific Plans. With over 20 years of professional planning experience Starla has successfully managed a wide range of projects with particular emphasis in General Plans, urban infill, downtown, and redevelopment projects. Utilizing her experience in community planning, Starla is regularly involved in land use and policy planning, including the development and implementation of community outreach programs, and frequently manages and prepares environmental clearance documents for citywide policy planning and redevelopment projects. Through her extensive experience in both policy and environmental planning, Starla is keenly aware of the interaction between the two and consistently takes a proactive and comprehensive approach to understanding planning and environmental issues and developing solutions. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE General Plan Update and Rezoning EIR, Marlin Drive IS/ND City of Lomita City of Laguna Beach Housing Element, Rezoning Program, and ODS CEQA Compliance, City of Laguna Hills Housing and Safety Element Update CEQA Compliance City of Rancho Santa Margarita Land Use Element, Zoning Code, and Zoning Map Amendment CEQA Compliance City of Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan and Zoning Update EIR City of San Jacinto Downtown Core EIR City of Fontana General Plan Land Use and Zoning Amendments EIR City of Gardena General Plan Update EIR City of La Verne General Plan Update EIR City of Lawndale The Commons at Aliso Viejo IS/MND City of Aliso Viejo 2500 North Hollywood Way Hotel EIR City of Burbank The Harper Mixed Use Project EIR City of West Hollywood 385 Nyes Place IS/MND City of Laguna Beach 2354 San Clemente IS/MND City of Laguna Beach 820 Gainsborough IS/MND City of Laguna Beach Hotel Development Standards GPA & Zone Change IS/MND City of Gardena 1500 Raymond Ave Industrial IS/MND City of Fullerton 1901 Via Burton Industrial CEQA City of Fullerton General Plan Transportation & Mobility Element Update ND City of Bell Gardens Applied Medical Expansion IS/MND City of Lake Forest Lock & Leave Self Storage IS/MND City of Lake Forest Melia Evergreen Residential IS/MND City of Gardena Olson Townhomes IS/MND City of Gardena 2550 Orange Industrial IS/MND City of Signal Hill Paradise Chevrolet IS/MND City of Temecula Bedford Court IS/MND City of Temecula De Novo Planning Group A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm EDUCATION Master of City and Regional Planning, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo BA, Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles ORGANIZATIONS American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals Congress for the New Urbanism LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners, 2023, No. 343661 Erik Anderson, AICP ASSOCIATE PLANNER Erik has worked on a diverse range of projects for public and private sector clients, with a focus on land -use planning, policy development, and environmental and sustainability planning. Erik provides project support in the preparation of CEQA documentation and long-range planning documents, including General Plans, Housing Elements, Zoning updates, and Local Hazard Mitigation Plans. His background experience includes grassroots lobbying with a non-profit environmental organization and work in the legal field. Erik is passionate about serving communities and creating innovative work through place -based development strategies. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE General Plan Update, Zoning Update, and EIR, City of Lomita Housing Element, Rezoning Program, and ODS CEQA Compliance, City of Laguna Hills General Plan Update, Zoning Update, and EIR City of San Jacinto General Plan Update, Hawthorne Blvd Specific Plan Update, and EIR City of Lawndale Zoning Update and Addendum to General Plan EIR City of Westminster General Plan Land Use and Zoning Amendments EIR City of Gardena General Plan Update and EIR City of Red Bluff Downtown Core EIR City of Fontana Mountain House Incorporation IS/ND San Joaquin County SR-120 Interchange IS/MND City of Lathrop/Caltrans Circulation Element Update IS/ND City of Bell Gardens U-Haul Expansion IS/MND City of Gardena 2354 San Clemente IS/MND City of Laguna Beach 16800 Magnolia Addendum City of Fountain Valley 1500 Raymond Ave Industrial IS/MND City of Fullerton 1901 Via Burton Industrial CEQA City of Fullerton 1941 White Avenue Mixed -Use CEQA Exemption City of La Verne 2500 North Hollywood Way Hotel EIR City of Burbank The Harper Mixed Use Project EIR City of West Hollywood The Commons at Aliso Viejo IS/MND City of Aliso Viejo Paradise Chevrolet IS/MND City of Temecula Focused General Plan Update City of Glendale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Laguna Hills, CA Housing and Safety Element Update City of Rancho Santa Margarita Housing Element Update (6th Cycle) Cities of Lawndale, Glendale, Hawthorne, La Verne, Avalon, Lake Forest, Rancho Santa Margarita, Westminster, Martinez, Temecula, and San Jacinto De Novo Planning Group A Land Ilse Planning, Design, and F.nvirannental Firm NONE EDUCATION MCP, City Planning, Urban Design Concentration University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia BS, Urban, Rural, and Environmental Planning, Brigham Young University, Provo Research, Cambridge University (UK), Pembroke College ORGANIZATIONS Urban Land Institute AICP Certified, American Planning Association AICP Certification # 35377 U.S. Green Building Council LEED AP BD+C, Credential Id # 10433552-AP-BD+C Megan Thorne, AICP, LEED AP SD+C SENIOR PLANNER + DESIGNER Megan Thorne is a senior planner and project manager with De Novo Planning Group. With over 15 years of professional planning experience, Megan has worked on a wide variety of planning projects for public and private sector clients, including numerous specific plans, general plans, corridor plans, site plans, design guidelines, strategic plans, sustainability programs, visioning projects, transit - oriented development plans, zoning documents, outreach programs, and 3D visualizations. Megan possesses the ability to think creatively and envision change while keeping projects grounded with achievable benchmarks and implementable policy goals. She excels at communicating complex information and policy ideas in a compelling and simple manner. As a designer, Megan has differentiated herself with her hand -drawing abilities as well as her technical skills. Her technical expertise includes 3D modeling, graphic design, and web design. She continues to pioneer ways new technology can improve old processes from community outreach approaches to the web -publication of planning documents. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Burbank Media District Specific Plan City of Burbank* Rialto Specific Plan Update City of Rialto* River Walk Specific Plan Stanislaus County Downtown Bellflower Transit - Oriented Development Specific Plan City of Bellflower* West Carson Transit -Oriented Development Specific Plan City of West Carson* Morena Corridor Specific Plan City of San Diego* Long Beach Southeast Area (SEASP) Specific Plan City of Long Beach* Stanton Plaza Specific Plan Amendment and EIR Addendum City of Stanton* Airport Gateway Specific Plan Inland Valley Development Agency* Harmony Specific Plan Lewis Companies, City of Highland* De Anza Revitalization Plan City of San Diego* Fontana Downtown Design Guidelines City of Fontana Irvine Neighborhood Plan City of Irvine General Plan Update and EIR City of San Jacinto General Plan Update and EIR City of La Verne General Plan Update and EIR City of Lake Forest General Plan Update and EIR City of Westminster* General Plan Update and EIR City of San Marcos South El Monte Zoning Code Update City of South El Monte* Hemet Zoning Code Update City of Hemet* ADU Ordinance and Guidebook City of lone City of Bellflower Sign Code Update City of Bellflower Temecula CAP Baseline Study City of Temecula* OCCOG Geospatial Solutions Orange County Council of Governments* Housing Policy Leadership Academy Southern California Association of Governments* Livermore Downtown Visioning & Site Planning City of Livermore* * Project was completed by Ms. Thorne while she was employed at another planning firm De Novo Planning Group A Land Ilse Planning, Design, and F.nvirann—tal Firm NONE EDUCATION BA, Political Science, University of California, San Diego Master of City and Regional Planning, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo ORGANIZATIONS American Planning Association Association of Environmental Professionals AWARDS 2023 City and Regional Planning Outstanding Student Award 2023 Academic Award of Excellence, APA Central Coast Division Abdul jama ASSISTANT PLANNER Abdul holds a Master's Degree in City and Regional Planning from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo. He brings a strong interest and comprehensive experience in environmental and long-range planning. Abdul has contributed to a wide range of public and private sector projects, focusing on environmental review, land use planning, and policy development. His work includes CEQA document preparation such as initial studies, environmental impact reports, and mitigated negative declaration documents. His long-range planning efforts includes General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update, and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan preparation. Abdul is excited to provide top quality environmental, land use and policy development to all communities and individuals. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE General Plan Update and EIR City of Lomita General Plan Update and EIR City of Laguna Niguel General Plan Update City of Brea General Plan Update County of Orange General Plan Update Town of San Anselmo General Plan Update EIR City of Glendale Dixon 257 EIR City of Dixon Housing Rezones EIR City of Tracy UC Villages EIR City of Merced Vineyard One EIR City of Saratoga Sustainability Implementation Program City of Lake Forest Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Glendora Grevillea-Imperial Hotel CE City of Hawthorne Riddle Field Park CE City of Laguna Beach The Commons IS/MND City of Aliso Viejo 385 Nyes Place IS/MND City of Laguna Beach 820 Gainsborough Drive IS/MND City of Laguna Beach Paradise Chevrolet IS/MND City of Temecula De Novo Planning Group A Land Ilse Planning, Design, and F.nvirannental Firm Education Master of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Arts in Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz Employment History Budget Analyst for City of San Francisco (1995) Research Analyst, Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics (1994-5) Business Analyst, Port Authority of New York/New Jersey (1994) Print Media Journalist, States News Service, Washington, DC (1989-1992) Affiliations International Downtown Association International Economic Development Council Publications/Presentations "Retail versus Housing: Rethinking the Fiscal Paradigm" Meta -hosted webinar, June 10, 2022 "Bay Area Downtowns: Place Types and Post Pandemic Prospects." San Mateo Council of Cities, May 22, 2022 "Repositioning Languishing Assets: Building for the Missing Middle." ULI Urban Revitalization Council, Fall 2020 "COVID-19: Cross -Cutting Trends toward a New Reality." Lambda Alpha International Spring /Summer, 2020 "Town Centers: Typologies and Policy Directions," Bay Area Planning Directors Association (BAPDA), Spring 2017 Meeting "Urban -Suburbia;" Urban Land Magazine, October 2008 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. The Economics of Land Use www.epsys.com Jason Moody Managing Principal Jason Moody has worked at the firm for over 30 years and has been instrumental in building the firms presence in Southern California. He has extensive experience in the areas of real estate market and financial analysis, socio-economic forecasting, regional economics, and corridor revitalization. He regularly works for both public and private sector clients, focusing on the feasibility and economic implications of individual projects as well as larger areas, including mixed -use districts, corridors, and entire cities. Jason has applied this expertise in numerous land use planning and policy efforts, including General Plans, Specific Plans, and Master Plans, as part of multidisciplinary teams. • CITY OF LAKEWOOD INTERACTIVE FISCAL MODEL EPS developed an interactive and comprehensive fiscal modeling tool for the City of Lakewood that measured the differential impacts of various land uses (e.g., single-family, multi -family, office, retail, warehouse -industrial) and potential policy changes (e.g., zoning, tax or fee rates, etc.). • WESTMINSTER MALL SPECIFIC PLAN EPS provided analysis of development feasibility and public financing options for the Implementation Chapter of the Westminster Mall Specific Plan designed to reposition and revitalize an under- performing shopping center with mixed -use development. The Specific Plan was approved in 2022 and won the 2023 APA Orange Section "Economic Planning & Development Award of Excellence". • SIGNAL HILL CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN EPS evaluated financing options to support a master plan to include a new Community Center, a performing arts amphitheater, and related infrastructure to be integrated within the City of Signal Hill's existing civic center and community park. • LAKE FOREST GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND MIXED -USE ZONING CODES EPS was part of a team that developed the City of Lake Forest's General Plan Update, which was APA Orange County's 2021 Comprehensive Plan of the Year, and that project was followed by a mixed -use zoning codes effort to advance the vision and transform largely industrial areas into high -quality mixed -use developments. • SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Evaluated long-term economic and market conditions, analyzed development opportunities and feasibility, and formulated economic development goals and policies for General Plan Update in this Riverside County bedroom community. • LA VERNE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Evaluated long-term economic and market conditions and fiscal considerations relevant to the General Plan Update for this mature and successful community. o 1330 Broadway, Suite 450, Oakland, CA 94612 510 841 9190 jmoody@epsys.com Education Master of Public Policy, Harris Public Policy at the University of Chicago Certificate in Municipal Finanace Bachelor of Arts, International Studies, University of Chicago Previous Employment Associate, Development Strategies, Saint Louis, MO (2014-2018) Policy Intern, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, IL (2013) Research Assistant, Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL (2012- 2013) Affiliations American Planning Association Urban Land Institute NABE Los Angeles Chapter Westside Urban Forum Lambda Alpha International Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. The Economics of Land Use www.epsys.com Julie Cooper Principal Julie Cooper joined EPS's Los Angeles office in 2018, bringing professional experience in land use, economic, and community development consulting. She has provided strategic planning services for public, private, and institutional clients, including analysis of market and economic conditions, development feasibility and fiscal impact modeling, and policy recommendations. She also has extensive experience in stakeholder and community engagement. • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN UPDATES Julie is serving or has recently served as principal-in-chaarge and project manager for EPS's engagement on teams updating the General Plans in the cities of Riverside, Lomita, Laguna Niguel, San Jacinto, Lawndale, San Marcos, and Lake Forest. Firm tasks include evaluating demographic, economic, market, and fiscal conditions in the cities; identifying real estate and economic development opportunities; testing the fiscal impacts of proposed land use alternatives; and preparing Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Elements as part of the General Plan document. The work includes engagement with city staff and stakeholders. For these projects, Julie has been responsible for coordinating EPS's work with the lead consultant, attending meetings with staff and stakeholders, and producing deliverables. She has also served as lead technical analyst, researching existing conditions, conducting fiscal impact analysis, and contributing to policy recommendations. • RIVERSIDE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM EPS was engaged by the City of Riverside to study an inclusionary housing requirement for new residential development. EPS's tasks included developing market -rate housing prototypes likely to be built in the City, identifying a range of potential inclusionary requirements, and testing the feasibility impacts of these requirements on new market -rate development. EPS additionally completed a nexus analysis and assisted the City with drafting an inclusionary housing ordinance. As Project Manager, Julie was responsible for coordinating and communicating with the City staff, conducting research and technical analysis, and overseeing stakeholder and community outreach efforts. 0 LOST HILLS COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY EPS was engaged by a major regional employer to support the creation of a Community Service District (CSD) in the unincorporated community of Lost Hills in Kern County. EPS's work assessing costs associated with providing services through a CSD; identifying potential revenue sources to support the CSD; and developing a fiscal feasibility analysis for the proposed district as required by LAFCo as part of the CSD formation process. Julie served as project manager and primary researcher/analyst for EPS's work. o 800WilshireBoulevard, Suite 410,Los Angeles, CA90017 2134893838 jcooper@epsys.com Education Gonzaga University - Bachelor of Arts Political Science University of California, Los Angeles- Master of Urban and Regional Planning Previous Employment Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest, Homeless Services Coordinator at Corpus Christi House, Boise, ID Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Project Coordinator in Triple Aim Portfolio, Boston, MA Brigham and Women's Hospital, Project Coordinator, Boston, MA AECOM, Economics Intern, Los Angeles, CA Affiliations American Planning Association Urban Land Institute Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. The Economics of Land Use www.epsys.com Andrew Williams Senior Associate Andrew Williams joined Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) in 2022, bringing academic and professional experience in economic development, battery supply chain research, and environmental policy. He has provided strategic planning services for a variety of public and private clients as a project manager and technical analyst, including analysis of markets and economic conditions and economic and fiscal impact modeling. Before joining EPS, Andrew worked in public health, focusing on the social determinants of health in communities across the US. • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN UPDATES EPS is currently or has recently been engaged as part of multidisciplinary teams to update the General Plans for several cities in Southern California, including the cities of Lawndale, Indian Wells, San Marcos, and Laguna Niguel. Firm tasks include researching and evaluating long-term demographic, economic, market, and fiscal conditions in the cities; identifying real estate and economic development opportunities; testing the fiscal impact on the municipal budget of proposed land use alternatives; and preparing Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Elements as part of the General Plan document. The projects include engagement with city staff and stakeholders. Andrew is providing a key role in the analysis, creating fiscal impact models, conducting stakeholder interviews, and contributing to economic and fiscal policy recommendations. • UC RIVERSIDE ECONOMIC, FISCAL, AND COMMUNITY IMPACTS STUDY (2023) EPS is working with the City of Riverside to perform a fiscal and financial analysis of the impacts of the University on City infrastructure and service provision as well as the University's larger economic impact. Andrew led technical efforts to understand the economic impact on the City and County of Riverside based on current economic activity and projected growth patterns • TULARE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN (2023-ONGOING) EPS is part of a multidisciplinary team preparing an updated Master Plan for Tulare's historic Downtown. The goals of the Plan are to drive redevelopment of Downtown properties, improve the public and private realm, and leverage City initiatives to revitalize Downtown into an activity center for residents, workers, and visitors. EPS's role has included a review of real estate market trends impacting the City and the Downtown, an evaluation of the financial feasibility of several catalyst projects on opportunity sites, and recommendations for economic development initiatives, financial incentives, and financing tools that the City might utilize to achieve the Plan's goals. Andrew is serving as the lead technical analyst in conducting market research and financial feasibility models. 800 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 410, Los Angeles, CA 90017 213 489 3838 awilliams@epsys.com EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis REG ISTRATION S Professional Engineer (Nevada #19078) Professional Engineer (Hawaii #17490) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Total: 22 With Fehr & Peers: 22 AFFILIATIONS • Member, American Planning Association (APA) • Modeling Sub Committee Chair, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), San Diego Chapter • Member, Women in Transportation Seminars (WTS) EXPERTISE • Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning • Climate Planning • Highway Operations Analysis • Parking, Site Access & Circulation Studies • Transportation/Master Planning • Traffic Impact Analysis • Travel Demand Management FEHR t PEERS Katy Cole, PE Principal I Project Manager ABOUT Katy is a principal and registered engineer with over 22 years of project management experience, based locally in the Fehr & Peers San Diego office. Katy's professional experience includes managing hundreds of projects across disciplines. Her expertise spans travel demand management plans/quantification, multimodal corridor studies, traffic micro -simulation analysis, transportation master planning, parking studies, access and circulation studies, traffic operations analyses, and transportation impact studies. Katy is dedicated to providing excellent client service and one of her favorite aspects of her career is working with clients, stakeholders, decision makers, and the public to reach consensus. She loves teaching people about transportation engineering and planning and can explain complex transportation concepts to a wide variety of audiences. PRESENTATIONS & PUBLICATIONS Author, ITE Transportation Capacity & Mobility Task Force Guidelines for Transportation Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, 2020 WTS Woman of the Year, San Diego Section, 2021 PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Temecula SB 743 Implementation(Temecula, CA) Project Manager. Katy managed the Temecula SB 743 implementation. She navigated the City through decisions on VMT metrics, thresholds, and screening criteria. Additionally, she met several times with the City's General Plan Sub -Committee and City Council to provide education on SB 743 and VMT. The City's guidelines also include a dashboard -based Excel calculator tool to assist City staff and applicants with the screening criteria process and to determine travel demand effectiveness. City of Temecula Complete Streets Ordinance (Temecula, CA) Principal -in-Charge. Katy oversaw development of a complete streets ordinance and checklist for the City of Temecula. Fehr & Peers worked collaboratively across several city departments to develop a process for reviewing roadway projects to insure that complete streets characteristics were being considered consistently. In addition, Fehr & Peers drafted an ordinance solidifying the City's goals for considering complete streets where practical. City of Temecula Discovery & Existing Conditions (Temecula, CA) Project Manager. Fehr & Peers prepared a detailed transportation existing conditions assessment of the City of Temecula. The analysis included discovery, benchmarking, and documentation to support the City of Temecula's General Plan update process. City of Temecula Old Town Parking Management (Temecula, CA) Principal -in -Charge. Fehr & Peers has provided parking management strategies and guidance to the City of Temecula for many years. Most recently, Fher & Peers assisted the City with exploring automated parking data collection options and vendors. The City is currently running a pilot program investigating one of the vendors identified during Fehr & Peers work. NCTD Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (North San Diego County, CA) Principal In Charge. As a sub -consultant, Katy oversaw the development of transportation and vehicle miles traveled analysis for the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan. The metrics analyzed include the amount of VMT "offset" by transit users, VMT generated by NCTD employees, and the VMT benefit achieved through development of transit -oriented development at NCTD's transit stations. We prepared a tool that allows for updating the analysis as needed. City of San Diego Citywide SB 743 and Updated Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and VMT Reduction Ordinance (San Diego, CA) Project Manager. Katy led the preparation of the SB 743- related VMT guidelines for the City of San Diego, including the CEQA-level thresholds for project impacts. She also assisted the City with updating the City TIA guidelines to account for SB 743 and a change in the analysis of roadway operations. She assisted with the development of a VMT Reduction Ordinance framework which will allow the City of San Diego to require TDM measures throughout the city as VMT impact mitigation. City of Escondido SB 743 Implementation (Escondido, CA) Project Manager. Katy managed the SB 743-related VMT guidelines for the City of Escondido. She also lead the City's VMT Exchange Program. The Exchange Program allows development projects that require VMT mitigation to construct unfunded active transportation projects and received credit for the reduction in citywide VMT. The Exchange Program is one of the first of its kind in California and is an innovative programmatic approach to VMT mitigation. County of San Diego Countywide SB 743 (San Diego County, CA) Project Manager. Katy has been working with the County of San Diego to implement SB 743 since 2018. She led the development of the County Transportation Study Guidelines and has most recently been working with the County to develop programmatic mitigation options. Katy has led and attended dozens of public and stakeholder meetings and represented the County in multiple meetings with SANDAG. She has assisted County staff with Board Hearings, Management Briefings, and Community Planning Group outreach. County of San Diego TDM and Shared & Reduced Parking Ordinance Phase 1 (San Diego County, CA) Principal In Charge. Katy managed the preparation of a framework for a TDM and Shared and Reduced Parking Ordinance for the County of San Diego. Development of the TDM Ordinance is required by the County's Climate Action Plan. This work presented multiple options for ordinance implementation and monitoring and a point -based system to quantify the effectiveness of a variety of TDM measures and parking reduction minimums. City of Carlsbad SB 743 Implementation (Carlsbad, CA) Project Manager. Katy managed the SB 743 related VMT guidelines for the City of Carlsbad. In addition, Fehr & Peers serves as an on -call consultant to assist the City with implementing SB 743 on land use projects and City projects. City of Carlsbad Tamarack Avenue/Carlsbad Boulevard Operations Analysis (Carlsbad, CA) Project Manager. Katy assisted with a transportation study to evaluate intersection improvement options at the Carlsbad Boulevard/Tamarack Avenue intersection. The improvement options considered included changes to the lane configurations, addition of bicycle/pedestrian enhancements, a roundabout, and pedestrian scramble signal phasing. Fehr & Peers evaluated multimodal level of service for each improvement option to help identify how each option would affect each mode of travel. FEHR,�PEERS Jason Pack, TE Principal I Principal in Charge EDUCATION ABOUT Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Jason D. Pack, P.E., is a Principal with Fehr & Peers located in Southern California. He University of California, Davis,1999 is actively involved in a wide variety of project work but also finds time to lead the firm's research and development efforts in Emergency Evacuation assessment. Jason REGISTRATIONS has an extensive background in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations assessment (including micro -simulation assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, Licensed Traffic Engineer, State of California transit ridership forecasting, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and (TR2402) CEQA. His focus is to utilize his experience and the technical resources of the RECOGNITIONS company to help clients answer their toughest questions related to mobility. WTS Honorable Ray LaHood Award Winner His recent work has included forecasting and operations assessment for large (Man of the Year) — Inland Empire Chapter infrastructure improvements, developing recommendations for SB 743 (2023) implementation (California's new requirements to consider VMT as an impact metric under CEQA), assisting agencies with establishing VMT banks/exchanges, emergency PRESENTATIONS evacuation assessment to respond to new legislative requirements (SB 99 and AB 747) and development of innovative transportation policies to assist City's advancing VMT Related Presentations: transportation into the future. • 2023 UCLA Land Use Law and Policy Conference PROJECT EXPERIENCE • 2022 National APA • 2022 Western ITE General Plans • 2022 CEAC Public Works Officers Jason has worked on a wide variety of General Plans throughout the state of Institute California, including: • 2022 SBCOG City/County 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Conference • City of Palm Springs • 2019 California APA 0 City of Indio • 2019 CSU Facilities Conference • City of Moreno Valley Future of Transportation Presentations: • City of Carlsbad • 2018 SBCTA City/County 0 City of Redlands Conference 0 City of Corona • 2017 WRCOG Planning Conference • City of Montclair Parking Presentations: 0 City of Westminster • 2018 OC Planning Directors 0 County of San Bernardino Conference • City of Fountain Valley Emergency Evacuation Assessment — 2022 0 City of San Marcos National APA Conference 0 City of Chico Most of these projects included Complete Street elements, extensive travel demand forecasting, and some level of multi - modal transportation assessment. Riverside Countywide Model (RIVCOM) Model Development (Riverside County, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers assisted with the update to the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) which, now completed, is referred to as RIVCOM. The model was updated to be consistent with the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) model at the model boundaries while adding local sensitivity to better forecast on local facilities. The model was statically validated to average weekday and peak hour traffic volumes and regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The model was put through a dynamic validation exercise to ensure that the model is appropriately sensitive to both land use and network changes. An extensive coordination and outreach effort was undertaken with Riverside County jurisdictions to engage these communities and review trip generation, distribution, existing and future networks, and existing and future land use. Fehr & Peers' approach included model specification, documentation and user training WRCOG SB743 Implementation Pathway (Riverside County, CA) Principal in Charge. Fehr & Peers created a strategy and tools for WRCOG and local jurisdictions to implement SB 743 in Western Riverside County. Fehr & Peers evaluated existing travel demand models, developed baseline VMT data, developed a series of VMT estimation methodologies and thresholds, and identified priority mitigation measures. Fehr & Peers developed a tool to determine the options for VMT analysis and requirements depending on the project characteristics. Fehr & Peers developed a series of case studies that applied the developed tool, methodologies, and thresholds. Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans Jason has completed assessment for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below: • Wine Country Community Plan — Assisted Riverside County in developing a travel demand forecasting model and evaluation of the plan for the Temecula Wine Country Area • Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan - Evaluated a land use plan along Beach Blvd in Anaheim including vehicle and multi -modal capacity assessment • MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability Study — Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors in the greater Phoenix area • RTC of Southern Nevada High Capacity Transit Study — Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors in the Las Vegas area • Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan — Completing the transportation recommendations and assessment for this corridor in the City of Long Beach including extensive multi -modal assessment • Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan — Completed the transportation recommendations and assessment of the proposed University Master Plan • Holt Boulevard Corridor Plan — Assessing the corridor in the City of Ontario to consider multi -modal opportunities along the corridor (including a Bus Rapid Transit application) • CollegeTown Specific Plan —Assessing redevelopment of the block south of the Cal State Fullerton Campus including the closure of Nutwood Avenue, application of a street car through the project, and mixed -use development on the site (including Hope International University, retail, housing, and other development opportunities) • San Bernardino Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study — Assisting in developing transportation strategies in support of TOD along the SBx BRT system Climate Action Plans Jason has assisted with the development of Climate Action Plans (CAPS) by preparing VMT inventories using agency travel demand models, and recommending and quantifying countermeasures to support the plan. Example studies are identified below: • Riverside/San Bernardino MSA Climate Protection Reduction Program (CPRG) PCAP and CCAP • Western Riverside Council of Government CAP • San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Regional CAP • City of Palm Springs CAP • City of Rancho Cucamonga CAP • City of Redlands CAP Interchange and Corridor Studies Jason has completed the Traffic Report for numerous transportation infrastructure studies throughout California. The most notable of these studies are described below: • Cherry Street Extension, Temecula, CA • Rancho California Roundabout Corridor, Temecula Wine Country, CA • San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), 1-15 Express Lanes PS&E, San Bernardino County, CA. • Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I- 15 Express Lanes Southern Extension (ELPSE) PA&ED, Riverside County, CA. EDUCATION Master of Science, Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Purdue University REGISTRATIONS Engineer -in -Training (EIT #160490) YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Total: 8 With Fehr & Peers: 8 AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association (APA), San Diego Chapter EXPERTISE • Land Use and Transportation • Long -Range Transportation Planning • SB 743 Guidelines & Implementation • School Circulation & Access • Traffic Operations Analysis • Traffic Simulation • Transportation Demand Management • Travel Pattern Studies • Travel Demand Modeling FEHR,�PEERS Andrew Scher, F,rr Deputy Project Manager/ Lead Planner/ Modeler /\:lil9ll Andrew is a transportation planner/engineer with over eight years of project management experience. Andrew's expertise includes microsimulation analysis, corridor level operations analysis, SB 743 implementation, climate resiliency and evacuation, SANDAG Activity Based Model application, Big Data collection/analysis, and community master plans. aYi31:1ir111111111�7a4 41Q0111410 City of Temecula CEQA Traffic Analysis Update (Temecula, CA) Task Lead. Fehr & Peers developed transportation VMT guidelines for the City of Temecula as part of their SB 743 implementation. This included developing VMT analysis methodology, choosing data sources, developing thresholds and screening criteria for analysis, and determining potential mitigation measures to support compliance with SB 743. City of Temecula Discovery & Existing Conditions (Temecula, CA) Task Lead. Fehr & Peers prepared a detailed transportation existing conditions assessment of the City of Temecula. The analysis included discovery, benchmarking, and documentation to support the City of Temecula's General Plan update process. Cherry Street Extension (Temecula, CA) Fehr & Peers provided a detailed transportation analysis for the Cherry Street extension in the City of Temecula. Fehr & Peers prepared a transportation study which analyzed the project's effect on Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) based on the latest developments in the City's ongoing SB 743 implementation guidelines pertaining to CEQA. The transportation included an assessment of planned and needed roadway capacity for the proposed extension utilizing the roadway classifications in the City's Circulation Element. The analyses utilized the most recent Riverside County Transportation Model (RIVCOM). City of Carlsbad Sustainable Mobility Implementation Plan (Carlsbad, CA) Fehr & Peers is assisting Carlsbad in developing an Implementation Plan for the City's Sustainable Mobility Plan (SMP), which includes developing an impact fee study to assist in delivering the City's vision for sustainable mobility. Andrew supported the development of refined criteria to re -prioritize the SMP projects by summarizing the projects, documenting their overlap with previous planning efforts, and identifying the extent of transportation needs that each project would address. City of San Diego Barrio Logan Community Plan Update Modeling (San Diego, CA) Modeler. Fehr & Peers provided travel demand modeling services for the City of San Diego Barrio Logan Community Plan Update. Andrew updated the SANDAG Series 13 Activity Based Model socioeconomic data inputs and transportation network inputs for multiple analysis scenarios, helped run the model, and calculated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) data based on the model outputs. County of San Diego Climate Action Plan (San Diego County, CA) Technical Lead. Fehr & Peers prepared VMT estimates using the SANDAG Series 13 and 14 models to support the GHG inventory for the County of San Diego Climate Action Plan Update and analyze the Climate Action Plan EIR alternatives. Andrew led the technical effort to prepare land use inputs to the transportation model for all EIR alternatives, run the activity -based model, calculate total VMT, and compare the results for each alternative. The Trails at Carmel Mountain Ranch (San Diego, CA) Technical Lead. Fehr & Peers provided transportation analysis for The Trails at Carmel Mountain Ranch Project located at 14050 Carmel Ridge Road in the Carmel Mountain Ranch community of San Diego. This analysis conformed to the new transportation analysis requirements that the City of San Diego developed in response to SB 743 guidelines for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. Fehr & Peers performed a VMT analysis and Local Mobility Assessment (LMA) for the project consistent with the new Transportation Study Manual (TSM) being prepared by the City of San Diego. Andrew led the technical analysis for the project and prepared evacuation time estimates for the proposed project and community. City of Vista Local Roadway Safety Plan (Vista, CA) Task Lead. Fehr and Peers worked with the City of Vista to develop their Local Roadway Safety Plan, informed by a data - driven approach. The plan identifies key citywide trends by pairing collision factors such as collision type, primary mode, or proceeding movement with contextual variables such as number of lanes, proximity to schools, or intersection traffic control. The result is a list of descriptive collision trends that can easily be paired with actionable design solutions. High -risk roadways that are responsible for a disproportionate share of collisions were also identified. The final menu of countermeasures included a list of tailored strategies, including low-cost and quick -build options. SDSU Fenton Parkway Bridge EIR (San Diego, CA) Andrew led the technical studies for the transportation section of the EIR for the proposed Fenton Parkway Bridge over the San Diego River. The mobility analysis focused on changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), multimodal operations, and safety benefits resulting from the project. Fehr & Peers also provided input on the design of the bridge, including high -quality active transportation connections as a part of the project description. SANDAG Gateway Study (San Diego Region, CA) This study updated the 2016 SANDAG San Diego and Imperial Counties Freight Gateway Study by providing an up-to-date, holistic analysis of freight traffic in the Gateway Region, freight/cross-border flows analysis of existing conditions and future trends, and freight traffic management from a total supply chain perspective. Andrew worked with Streetlight Data to analyze freight and truck travel patterns to and from key facilities in the San Diego region. City of Westminter Garden Grove Boulevard Cycle Track (Westminster, CA) Fehr & Peers lead the design for traffic signal modifications and street lighting associated with a new two-way, class IV bicycle facility for the City of Westminster bikeway. The new class IV bikeway repurposes the cross section on Hoover to remove one travel lane, shifts traffic and includes new bicycle traffic signals, bicycle detection, new ATC controllers, video detection, push buttons and other traffic signal upgrades intended to improve traffic flow and safety for all users throughout the corridor. Andrew led the technical study assessing multimodal operations at the western termini of the cycle track at SR-22 and 1-405 using Simtraffic. He worked with Caltrans and the City of Westminster to inform intersection design and balance the needs of drivers and cycle -track users. City Center Utility Relocation Transportation Management Plan (Honolulu, HI) Fehr & Peers prepared a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) and completed signal and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) design plans for a portion of the Center City Utility Relocation project for the planned Honolulu rail transit system. For the City Center section of the rail project, utilities are being relocated along sections of Kamehameha Highway, Dillingham Street, and Kaaahi Street. Andrew assisted in assessing impacts to freeway travel times and queueing using the Vissim software for the TMP. WRCOG SB 743 Implementation Pathway (Riverside, CA) Lead Analyst. Fehr & Peers created a strategy and tools for WRCOG and local jurisdictions to implement SB 743 in Western Riverside County. We evaluated existing travel demand models, developed baseline VMT data, developed a series of VMT estimation methodologies and thresholds, and identified priority mitigation measures. We developed a tool to determine the options for VMT analysis and requirements depending on the project characteristics. We developed a series of case studies that applied the developed tool, methodologies, and thresholds. EDUCATION: > Master of Environmental Science and Management Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California, Santa Barbara > BS, Science -Ecology and Systematic Biology California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS: > Certified Professional in Stormwater Quality > QSD/QSP Certified AFFILIATIONS: > BIA/Southern California > National Association of Environmental Professionals > Urban Land Institute > U.S. Green Building Council IAN ADAM MESM, CPSWQ, QSD VP, Specialty Practices Irvine, CA Ian is Vice President, Specialty Practices and Fuscoe's Stormwater Management team leader. His specialty is water resources, with an emphasis in water quality regulations, sea -level rise policy, Clean Water Act Citizen Suits and resource agency negotiation. Sincejoining Fuscoe in 2001, Ian has served as an effective leader and technical resource for numerous projects and clients. Ian has worked on over 80 General Plan Updates and Specific Plans throughout California to assist municipalities and developers with infrastructure assessments, zoning approvals, EIR technical support and long term capital improvement planning. Ian has also worked extensively in the California Coastal Zone, processing Coastal Development Permits, addressing Sea -Level Rise technically and politically, and working in partnership with Coastal Staff on individual projects, Specific Plans and Local Coastal Programs. Through this experience, Ian is uniquely trained to address complex drainage and water quality projects for both public and private clients, especially those needing site -specific solutions, multi -phased schedules and high-level regional board involvement. For the past two years, Ian has been assisting local municipalities and counties on regional stormwater improvement projects, including both feasibility and final design. Ian enjoys the continuing pursuit of leadership development and is highly motivated by helping team members evolve into independent thinkers and leaders themselves. Ian's notable long-term clients include: City of Anaheim, Del Mar Fairgrounds, Orange County Fairgrounds, Los Angeles Turf Club and Del Mar Thoroughbred Club. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: > City of Inglewood General Plan Update Phase1, Inglewood > City of Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan, Long Beach > City of Glendora Arrow Highway Specific Plan & EIR, Glendora > City of Santa Ana General Plan Update, Santa Ana > City of Fountain Valley General Plan Update, Fountain Valley > City of Westminster General Plan Update, Westminster Fuscoe Team Member Since 2001 Fuscoe Principal Since 2011 F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G AIM �, yy 1 !J ;• i9f% d EDUCATION: > MS, Civil Engineering, California State Long Beach > BS, Civil Engineering, California State University Long Beach REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS: > PE CA#52976 > QSP/D CA #20169 > Coastal Engineering Certificate, Old Dominion University, VA AFFILIATIONS: > American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) SUSAN WILLIAMS PE, MS, QSD/P Technical Manager Irvine, CA Susan has 25+ years of experience in the civil engineering field of water resources for land development and public works. She is a very conscientious and responsible Technical Manager who acts as a central design team leader. Susan is highly proficient in designing the layout of project drainage facilities using applicable design standards, agency processing requirements and client expectations. Her specialties include drainage design (hydrology, hydraulics, stormwater) and preparation of H&H reports (including Drainage Reports, SWDR, WQMP, SWPPP, SUSMP) for entitlement and final design and construction plans (PS&E). She also has expertise in sewer and water design as well as preparation of hydraulic calculations, report and construction plans. Susan ensures quality of design and implements new ideas through communication, teamwork, supervision, participation, and plan reviews. Susan has provided services for a wide range of projects including mixed use developments, affordable housing, retail/commercial, master planned communities and various parks. More recently, Sue has been overseeing a team of engineers perform infrastructure assessments and CEQA technical reports for various specific plans and general plan updates including Santa Anita South Bristol SP &EIR, Long Beach Shoreline Village SP & EIR, Yucaipa Freeway Corridor SP & EIR, and City of Irvine GPU & EIR. She has worked with Cities of Irvine, Anaheim, Brea, and Newport Beach. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: > Inglewood General Plan Phase > Redondo Beach General Plan & EIR > City of Barstow General Plan Update & EIR > Artesia Downtown Specific Plan & EIR > Costa Mesa Fairview Specific Plan & EIR > South Bristol Specific Plan & EIR > The Groves Master Plan Community, Whittier, CA > 710 Broadway Mixed Use, Santa Monica, CA Fuscoe Team Member Since 2013 F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G ri EDUCATION > MURP, Master of Urban & Regional Planning University of California, Irvine > BA, Environmental Science & Policy University of California, Irvine AFFILIATIONS > Urban Land Institute > California Association of Environmental Professionals > American Planning Association AWARDS > 2023 Don Owen Water Policy & Science Fellowship Recipient > 2022-2023 California Planning Foundation, 1st Place Statewide Scholarship Recipient > 2022 Orange County Association of Environmental Professionals; Scholarship Recipient > 2022 Orange CountyAmerican Planning Association, Scholarship Recipient CAMERON CASTILLO, MURP Stormwater Specialist II Irvine, CA Cameron has extensive experience assisting municipalities with their NPDES MS4 Permit compliance, including reporting, data management, audit preparation, grant applications, and Best Management Practice (BMP) strategic planning. Cameron has assisted with the preparation of Municipal NPDES Stormwater Program Annual Reports for Cities in Los Angeles and Orange County. In Orange County, he has assisted the Cities of Fullerton, Tustin, Brea, and Los Alamitos with their Program Effectiveness Assessments (PEA). Cameron has also assisted permittees in evaluating Trash Amendment TM DL Track 1 impacts through GIS to assist with BMP planning. In Cameron's previous roles, he has assisted the Cities of Lakewood, Whittier, Downey, South Gate, Paramount, and Cerritos with successful grant applications to the Los Angeles County Safe Clean Water Program (Measure W) for 100% engineering design funding for multi -benefit regional stormwater capture projects. These stormwater capture projects work towards the goals of the Watershed Management Plans (WMPs) of the Lower Los Angeles River, Lower San Gabriel River, and Los Cerritos Channel Watershed Management Groups within Los Angeles County. These groups regularly report to the Los Angeles Country Water Resources Control Board on progress of their WMPs. In addition to working towards the goals identified in the WMPs, Cameron has also assisted individual Cities on their municipal reporting for the Safe Clean Water Program. Cameron has worked with the Cities of Pico Rivera, Monterey Park, Diamond Bar, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lomita, Lynwood, Whittier, La Mirada, Temple City and South El Monte with their Annual Expenditure Plans as well as their Annual Expenditure Reports. Lastly, Cameron co-authors Environmental Impact Report technical documents that analyze existing infrastructure for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance. This analysis includes reviewing storm drain, water and sewer infrastructure and determining if it is capable of supporting a City/County's anticipated growth as described within its General or Specific Plan. Cameron has worked with the City of Yucaipa on its Wine Country Specific Plan as well as the City's Freeway Corridor Specific Plan. He is also working extensively in the City of Burbankon several Specific Plans including Burbank Downtown TOD SP, Golden State SP and Media District SP. Cameron has developed comprehensive water and sewer demand modeling to assist with City with water and sewer system evaluations. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS: > City of Bartstow General Plan Update & EIR > County of Orange General Plan Update > City of Redondo Beach General Plan Update & EIR > Yucaipa Valley Wine Country Specific Plan > City of Burbank, Various Specific Plans Fuscoe Team Member Since 2022 F U L L C I R C L E T H I N K I N G Andrew Watkins is an architect, urban designer, and planner with over 20 years of professional experience. Andrew is licensed in California and Massachusetts. As a principal at JZMK, his work focuses on large-scale urban design projects that explore the confluence of ecology and urbanism. Andrew has led the design of community plans, urban design and new city planning projects in diverse locales, the United States, UAE, KSA, Egypt, China, Indonesia, India, South Africa, Botswana, Ethiopia, Germany, Italy, Armenia and Mexico. Andrew's work focuses on place making and creating high -quality public realms. His project experience includes urban and suburban revitalization as well as green -field development, with new community work totaling over 20,000 acres of development featuring more than 50,000 homes, retail, commercial and light industrial districts. Andrew has particular interests in projects that engage wellness and the ecological systems of food, mobility, waste, shelter and water. A Full Member of ULI, he is part of the national Residential Neighborhood Development Council, Health Leaders Network and serves locally as part of the Building Healthy Places Council and For Sale Housing Council. Andrew holds a Bachelors of Architecture from Syracuse University and a Masters of Architecture in Urban Design from the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. ANDREW WATKINS, AIA AICP PARTNER / DIRECTOR OF URBAN DESIGN & PLANNING YEARS EXPERIENCE 21 EDUCATION MASTERS IN ARCHITECTURE IN URBAN DESIGN, HARVARD UNIVERSITY BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AFFILIATIONS AIA, AICP, LEED AP, WELL AP, ULI, BIA CONTACT awatkins@jzmkpartners.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE LAKE FOREST GENERAL PLAN CLIENT: CITY OF LAKE FOREST LOCATION: LAKE FOREST CALIFORNIA Urban design and planning services were provided for the City of Lake Forest General Plan Update. Lake Forest was pursuing a modern General Plan that would reflect contemporary community values and priorities — and provide the framework to balance quality of life with improved economic and fiscal conditions. As part of the larger General Plan Land Use Map, five focus areas were identified as potential locations for future growth, to support economic development, maintain fiscal sustainability, and help create activity nodes. LOMITA GENERAL PLAN AND OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CLIENT: CITY OF LOMITA LOCATION: LOMITA, CALIFORNIA JZMK provided urban design and planning services in support of the Lomita General Plan. This included planning analysis, land use studies, zoning code modifications and the development of Objective Design Standards (ODS).The ODS establishes an agreed upon level of quality from the City that gives developers clear direction for their development projects. The code include chapters covering site design, building design, architectural styles and landscape. SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN CLIENT: CITY OF SAN MARCOS LOCATION: SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA The San Marcos General Plan provides contemporary updates on the key topics of land use, equity, housing, economic development, transportation, and parks and recreation. The process is a community -driven effort to ensure the community's needs and objectives are reflected in an update intended to guide development over the next 10 to 20 years. Katja joined JZMK Partners in 2000 after graduating from the University of Applied Science, Stuttgart, Germany with a Bachelor Degree in Architecture. As a Principal at JZMK, she has lead the Design Team on a variety of major residential projects in California, Texas, China and the Middle East. Her innovative designs range from Custom Residences, Recreational Facilities, Resort Clubhouses, Mixed -use Facilities and High-rise Residential Buildings. A recent achievement is the high density, urban in -fill project along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China that includes High-rise Residential towers, high -end Retail and a 5-star Hotel. Additional projects include the Marassi Beach Clubhouse in Egypt and the high density, award winning Hillside Project in Austin, Texas. Katja's diligent, thorough and decisive approach consistently results in meeting or exceeding client's expectations. In her position she also manages Business Development efforts and facilitates client communication. Mrs. Martinez is a past member of Toast Master International where she held the office of Secretary and Vice President of Membership. She completed her course with an award in public speaking. Katja currently holds the past position of President and Board of Directors for the 55+ Housing Council in Southern California. KATJA MARTI N EZ PRINCIPAL/SENIOR DESIGNER YEARS EXPERIENCE 24 EDUCATION BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE, STUTTGART GERMANY AFFILIATIONS AIA CONTACT kmartinez@jzmkpartners.com LANGUAGES ENGLISH, GERMAN, FRENCH PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE SL70 CLIENT: TRUMARK HOMES LOCATION: SILVERLAKE, CALIFORNIA Designed under the small lot ordinance of L.A., this urban infill project is part of a recent re -development in Silver Lake.This 2.34 acre development hosts 70 Luxury homes designedwith a contemporary look that reflects the young and dynamicurban lifestyle. The five plans includes side -by -side garagesand a modern home office located on the first level. The expansive Great Room with its 10' ceiling is located on thesecond floor level,boosting large kitchen islands and anopen staircase.An exterior staircase leads up to the open roof decks that are ideal for barbecuing and entertaining. WESTREEF CLIENT: PINNACLE RESIDENTIAL LOCATION: COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA Situated on 1.42 acres of previously commercially zoned land, these (17) Single Family Dwelling Units are centrally located in the heart of Costa Mesa and fall under the newly adopted Small Lot Ordinance. The development consists of (4) phases that are either 2 or 3 stories in nature. Each home plan offers 2-car side -by -side garages and open floor plans, featuring large kitchen islands and 9 Foot ceilings throughout. Large glass openings enhance the indoor -outdoor experience and private rear yards and upper decks offer spectacular views of the nearby Pacific Ocean. EUCLID + HEIL CLIENT: SHOPOFF REALTY INVESTMENTS LOCATION: FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Euclid + Heil, an 18-acre multi -family residential project in Fountain Valley, is situated next to Mile Square Park.This development will offer a central recreational hub, complete with a sparkling swimmin7g pool and relaxing hot tub. Surrounding the area, you'll find a variety of inviting seating options, including luxurious chaise lounges and private cabanas, perfect for unwinding and socializing. The project will include 36 two-story triplexes and 183 three-story townhomes designed by JZMK Partners, providing modern living spaces and a wealth of amenities. Both residential products showcase a modern architectural style. TIM HAAGEN ASSOCIATE / SENIOR PLANNER YEARS EXPERIENCE 20 EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO BACHELOR OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AFFILIATIONS CONTACT thaagen@jzmkpartners.com LANGUAGES ENGLISH Tim Haagen brings 20 years of experience in urban design, planning and landscape architecture to JZMK. Following completion of his Bachelors of Landscape Architecture from the University of Idaho in 2002, Tim spent several years working for a landscape architecture office specializing in built residential landscapes and community design. There he practiced the art of landscape architecture taking a project from a blank canvas through design development to final build -out through construction documents and construction administration. Tim furthered his career as Project Planner and Landscape Designer at globally recognized hospitality -based design firm WATG in the planning studio for nearly a decade where he constantly collaborated with architects, landscape architects and interior designers to craft the stories and visions for hospitality -based master planning projects (luxury resorts, hotels, high -end residential), urban design,thematic parks and design, site planning for hotels and commercial spaces and golf course -centric projects. Tim's wide -reaching body of work includes projects in China, Korea, the Middle East, South, Central and North America and in exotic locales like the Caribbean, Mediterranean, Azerbaijan, Panama, Hawaii and the Philippines. At JZMK Tim has expanded his portfolio to include domestic urban design and local residential -based infill development. With his training and experience in landscape architecture working at a smaller scale, Tim is able to contribute a detail oriented perspective while thinking critically at a master planning scale. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE LOMITA GENERAL PLAN AND OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS CLIENT: CITY OF LOMITA LOCATION: LOMITA, CALIFORNIA JZMK provided urban design and planning services in support of the Lomita General Plan. This included planning analysis, land use studies, zoning code modifications and the development of Objective Design Standards (ODS).The ODS establishes an agreed upon level of quality from the City that gives developers clear direction for their development projects. The code include chapters covering site design, building design, architectural styles and landscape. MISSION VIEJO OBJECTIVE DESIGN CLIENT: CITY OF MISSION VIEJO LOCATION: CITY OF MISSION VIEJO JZMK created Objective Design Standards for the City of Mission Viejo that are used to evaluate multifamily and mixed -use residential/commercial development applications and provide direction to developers and property owners on the key design components of site planning, site design, architectural theme and open space/landscape to streamline the project approval process. These non -subjective standards will ensure development maintains the City of Mission Viejo's vision for design quality and appearance. INDIGO CLIENT: MERISTEM COMMUNITIES LOCATION: RICHMOND<TX A new agrihood community in Richmond, Indigo is envisioned as a walkable, mixed -use community focused on wellness and local food production. By incorporating a six -acre, human -scaled farm within the village core, the project seeks to connect residents with the food they eat in new and engaging ways. At the heart of the village core is an event barn that serves as both the primary community monumentation and the hub of activity. A system of mews and pocket parks establish linkages throughout the community. JANA SOBHI PLANNER YEARS EXPERIENCE EDUCATION CONTACT LANGUAGES Jana Sobhi graduated from German University of Technology in Oman with a Bachelor's degree in Design in Urban Planning and Architecture. Before moving to the United States she worked for several years in Oman as a junior architect and planner with a strong background in master planning. There she gained expertise in Middle East projects including multi- family homes, residential properties, converting residential units into commercial and mixed -use projects. At JZMK Jana works on urban design and planning projects. She has experience working in the United States, Egypt and Abu Dhabi with projects ranging in size from a few acres to thousands. She has worked on project types that include city expansions, master planned communities and urban infill Jana enjoys problem solving, graphic representation and creating great urban environments. She is skilled at project GERMAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY BACHELOR OF SCIENCE jsobhi@jzmkpartners.com ENGLISH, ARABIC PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE RANCHO MISSION VIEJO PA8 PLANNING CLIENT: RANCHO MISSION VIEJO LOCATION: ORANGE COUNTY, CA JZMK is currently working on a feasibility study for Planning Area 8 within Rancho Mission Viejo. This site, adjacent to Camp Pendleton, presents numerous challenges including noise mitigation, grading and habitat preservation. MORAGA CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN CLIENT: PIEDMONT LOCATION: PIEDMONT, CALIFORNIA Encompassing approximately 18 acres and spanning both sides of Moraga Avenue within the canyon, the Moraga Canyon Specific Plan includes the development of 132 housing units catering to diverse income levels while meeting the City's housing element requirement. Existing recreational amenities, such as the soccer pitch/baseball/softball field, batting cages and skate park will be enhanced for both participants and spectators. The plan also includes the modernization of the Public Works Department visioning, 3D representation and GIS. Outside of urban design corporation yard. and planning Jana is an amateur photographer. SAN MARCOS GENERAL PLAN CLIENT: CITY OF SAN MARCOS LOCATION: SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA The San Marcos General Plan provides contemporary updates on the key topics of land use, equity, housing, economic development, transportation, and parks and recreation. The process is a community -driven effort to ensure the community's needs and objectives are reflected in an update intended to guide development over the next 10 to 20 years. JENNA TOURJE-MALDONADO PRINCIPAL & SENIOR FACILITATOR r G Orange County, CA JTourje@kearnswest.com 760.296.9355 SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS K E A R N S 1M E S T Jenna Tourje-Maldonado is a Principal at Kearns & West with 18 years of experience in stakeholder facilitation, public engagement, and planning. She is dedicated to creating healthy, inclusive, and vibrant communities where residents feel a strong connection and have an active role in shaping their future. With a background as an outreach professional, urban planner, and educator, Jenna brings a distinct, informed perspective to each project she leads. Jenna designs outreach processes that foster connections among neighbors and strengthen ties between cities and their communities. Her work focuses on general and specific plans, zoning, climate action plans, and resiliency throughout Southern California. Currently, Jenna leads public engagement efforts for General Plans, Housing Elements, and Zoning Code Updates in cities including Newport Beach, Irvine, Laguna Niguel, and Santa Ana. Certified by the International Association of Public Participation (IAP2), she co -instructed the Graduate Planning Practicum for UC Irvine's Master of Urban Planning and Public Policy program. EXPERIENCE City of Newport Beach — Comprehensive General Plan Update EXPERTISE Project Manager & Lead Facilitator 12023 to Present Jenna leads the community engagement for the Newport Beach General Plan ■ Public Involvement Update, including a Listen & Learn process and special focus on the Housing and ■ Stakeholder Facilitation Circulation Elements. The project included a launch event, seven Council District ■ Urban and Environmental workshops, pop-up events, stakeholder interviews, focus groups, and digital Planning engagement for the Listen & Learn and Housing and Circulation Elements. EDUCATION &CERTIFICATIONS Outreach is recommencing to address other elements of the General Plan. MURP, Urban and Regional Planning City of Santa Ana — Zoning Code Update Project Manager & Lead Facilitator 12024 to Present University of California, Irvine The City of Santa Ana is updating its Zoning Code following a General Plan International Development Update. The Kearns & West team has been brought on to conduct community - University of California, Irvine ni University based organization engagement and stakeholder interviews, develop a Public Involvement Plan, and host a series of community workshops throughout the American Institute of Certified various zones in Santa Ana. Planners (AICP) American Planning Association City of Irvine — General Plan Update Lead Facilitator 12022 to Present Certificate, Public Participation The City of Irvine is currently updating its General Plan. As part of the process, International Association of Public the Kearns & West team is working to identify creative ways to integrate Participation (IAP2) community members in the update process. Kearns & West is employing a multi -pronged approach to purposefully engage each group through MEMBERSHIPS community -wide workshops, focus groups, and pop-up events. Jenna serves as the lead facilitator during community engagement events and as a strategic American Planning Association, advisor while planning outreach and engagement. Orange County Chapter (OC-APA) City of Anaheim — Brookhurst Corridor Vision International Association of Public Project Manager 12023 The City of Anaheim conducted a six-month study of the Brookhurst Corridor, Participation (IAP2) 3.5 miles of a major arterial highway that runs through West Anaheim. The Corridor is home to a variety of communities including the newly designated Little Arabia district. Jenna led formation of a working group comprised of residents, businesses, and nonprofit organizations and facilitated three working group meetings. She assisted with organizing three community events; a "walking tour" where 60+ residents walked a portion of Brookhurst and provided insights from their experience, and two open house events to gather feedback from residents on proposed recommendations for the Corridor. County of Orange — FIT Cities Initiative Lead Facilitator & Project Manager 12014 to 2016 Jenna led the FIT Cities Initiative for the Orange County Heath Care Agency under a grant from Kaiser Permanente. She was responsible for engaging with 34 cities in Orange County and regional staff in local agencies to encourage healthy communities activities in cities throughout Orange County. Her role included providing planning services, technical assistance, training, and outreach to local city staff, elected/appointed officials, and residents to integrate obesity prevention strategies into local planning efforts. City of Santa Clarita — Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Update Community Engagement Director 12021 to 2022 Kearns & West worked alongside Dudek to support the City of Santa Clarita by providing community outreach and engagement to gather input for an update of the successful Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. Jenna provided strategy and direction for engaging stakeholders and the community to update the Specific Plan, including facilitating focus groups and a socially distanced walking tour of Old Town Newhall. Engagement included pop-up events in Old Town Newhall. City of San Jacinto, General Plan Update Outreach Project Manager 12017 to 2019 Jenna leads the Kearns & West team in the outreach process for the Envision San Jacinto I General Plan 2040 update. Outreach for the project includes a digital engagement strategy, online surveys, visioning workshops, focus groups, stakeholder interviews, and pop-up events. City of San Marcos — San Marcos General Plan Update Project Manager & Lead Facilitator 12019 to Present The City of San Marcos began a General Plan Update with an emphasis on economic development and infill strategies alongside a Housing Element Update. Jenna leads community and stakeholder outreach for the General Plan Update, including facilitating the General Plan Advisory Community, in -person workshops and open house events, surveys, and digital engagement. City of Rancho Santa Margarita — Comprehensive General Plan Update & EIR* Public Outreach Specialist 12017 to 2018 Jenna's team led the outreach team for the Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan Update that engaged over 1000 residents. Residents were engaged through focus groups, roadshows, pop-up workshops, digital communication, and website design. The focus of the update is to "refresh" the Land Use, Economic Development, Conservation/Open Space, Safety, and Noise elements to address the continued vision for the city. Additionally, updates ensured that all elements are consistent with new state requirements for general plans. County of San Bernardino, Community Plans Continuum Project Lead Facilitator & Project Manager 12016 to 2018 As Group Project Manager, Jenna was responsible for managing six community plans in San Bernardino County as part of the larger community planning effort. As part of the countywide planning process, Jenna helped lead the development of community plans for 26 unincorporated communities. Communities range from the San Bernardino Mountains to the Mojave Desert. The project included intensive immersion weeks where multiple facilitations teams were immersed in each community conducting collaborative public workshops to engage communities to help develop goals, objectives, and action plans to address the issues and needs of each community. City of Oxnard - Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Facilitator 12019 to Present Jenna has been a facilitator for the Oxnard CAAP , leading engagement and facilitation of stakeholder groups to provide input into the strategies the City can implement. Engagement has included two series of focus groups, bi-lingual virtual workshops, and digital surveys to gather input and provide community insight. DANIELLE BERGER DIRECTOR SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS K E A R N S 4 W E S T Danielle Berger is a senior project manager with 10 years' professional experience as a land use planner specializing in creative public outreach and meeting facilitation. Danielle's approach to outreach focuses on equity and inclusivity and increasing opportunities for engagement and consensus building to meaningfully engage community members in the planning and design process. Danielle has experience working with various Southern California agencies, community -based organizations, and stakeholders to successfully plan and implement a variety of sustainability, planning, and equity -focused programs. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE V San Diego Region, CA City of Temecula — Ronald Reagan Sport Park and Bike Trail Program Project Manager 12025 to Present ► 4 DBerger@kearnswest.com Kearns & West is supporting prime, RHA, on outreach and engagement to design new mountain bike trails at Reagan Sports Park. Engagement includes a 4 858.326.3362 series of in -person community workshops and pop-up events where community members can provide feedback on trail alignment, uses, features, EXPERTISE and other design elements. Community input will inform the final design of the trail network. ■ Community Engagement ■ Tactical Urbanism ■ Environmental and Land Planning ■ Visual Storytelling EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS BA, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Geography University of Toronto I Toronto, ON, Canada MS, Urban Planning Columbia University I New York, NY American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) No. 029083 MEMBERSHIPS American Planning Association, San Diego County Chapter County of San Diego — Airports Sustainability Management Plan Project Manager 12023 to Present Danielle is coordinating and facilitating in -person and virtual meetings in support of the Sustainability Management Plan for the County's eight regional airports. Meeting content and facilitation has been tailored to meeting audiences, including aeronautical tenants, non -aeronautical tenants, community -based organizations, and the public. City of Alhambra — Comprehensive Environmental Sustainability Plan Outreach Manager 12023 to Present The City of Alhambra is developing a Comprehensive Environmental Sustainability Plan to provide a long-term, transformational pathway to improve sustainability across communities and critical sectors and provide mutual benefits for Alhambra's social, physical, and natural environment. Kearns & West leads engagement for this process with a focus on developing equitable, inclusive, and accessible public engagement that captures that vision and feedback from diverse local communities. Key engagement elements include stakeholder discussion groups, community workshops, a community advisory body, and arts -based programming to launch the process. California Coastal Conservancy, City of Oxnard, and The Nature Association of Environmental Conservancy — Ormond Beach Coastal Restoration and Public Access Plan Professionals, San Diego Chapter Public Engagement Project Manager 12024 to Present Danielle is leading the consultant's team's efforts to engage the local community, which have involved interactive community workshops, partnering with community -based organizations, and enlisting multilingual student volunteers as well as Spanish -language media outreach and in - person canvassing. County of Riverside — Western Riverside Council of Governments Active Transportation Plan Planner 12018 Prior to Kearns & West, Danielle served as a transportation planner for the Western Riverside County Active Transportation Plan. The Plan evaluated existing conditions of walking and biking infrastructure, set goals and objectives for increasing safety and effectiveness of the non -motorized system, and incorporated local safe -routes -to -schools planning efforts. City of San Diego — Inclusive Public Engagement Guide Project Manager 12023 Danielle is managing several tasks for the City Planning Department in preparation for the forthcoming Inclusive Public Engagement Guide. Tasks include documenting and consolidating the meeting summaries from the Kearns & West supported Focus Discussion Group process in 2023. Other tasks include developing engagement guidance for advisory groups, working groups, and committees, and best practices for facilitating public meetings and general engagement guidelines. County of San Diego — 3177 Ocean View Boulevard Affordable Housing Outreach Services Project Manager 12023 Danielle and the Kearns & West team provided outreach services to the County of San Diego for the affordable housing project at 3177 Ocean View Boulevard. Outreach strategies included bi-lingual in -person and virtual informational meetings that were facilitated by Kearns & West. These meetings provided an opportunity for community members to learn about the future development including future medical clinic facilities and ask questions directly to County staff. Public input gathered from these meetings will be included in the forthcoming develop Request for Proposals (RFP). Kearns & West also facilitated an industry day virtual meeting for local affordable housing developers and medical clinic providers to connect prior to the County releasing the RFP. County of San Diego — San Diego Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Project Manager 12020 to 2021 Prior to joining Kearns & West, Danielle worked for Circulate San Diego and served as the project manager for the San Diego Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health multi -year project. This project was part of a national program administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities. The focus area of this project was Imperial Avenue in the Chollas View/Encanto neighborhood of San Diego. The project was a collaborative effort between the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, and community groups to improve roadway safety and active transportation in southeastern neighborhoods of San Diego. The multi -year project identified built environment improvements to calm traffic, enhance walking and bicycling, and increase opportunities for residents to incorporate physical activity into their daily routines. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) — Mobility Solutions for Environmental Justice Communities Assessment and Toolkit Planner 12016 Danielle served as lead planner for the Mobility Solutions for Environmental Justice Communities Assessment and Toolkit. The study developed mobility solutions for City Heights — an environmental justice neighborhood of San Diego with a young population of many non-English speaking residents. Existing mobility infrastructure and services were visualized and analyzed to identify gaps such as limited bus service, incomplete bike networks, and/or dangerous walking paths. City of National City, City of El Cajon, and City of Vista — Healthy Communities, Healthy Residents Policy Reports Project Manager 12019 to 2020 Danielle served as project manager for the County of San Diego's Healthy Cities, Healthy Residents project in National City, City of El Cajon, and City of Vista, respectively. In partnership with the community -based organizations, Environmental Health Coalition, International Rescue Committee, and Vista Community Clinic, the project team worked with the Healthy Cities, Healthy Residents Coalition, City staff, and community partners to identify and champion policy solutions to improve pedestrian safety that support the active transportation needs of the community as well as climate action goals relating to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. TAYLOR FUNDERBURK SENIOR ASSOCIATE 0 San Diego, California OR tfunderburk@kearnswest.com �. 619.468.5208 EXPERTISE ■ Project Coordination ■ Research Data Collection & Analysis ■ Meeting Management ■ Event Planning ■ Survey Development ■ Materials Development EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS BA, Philosophy The College of Wooster I Wooster, OH MA, Nonprofit Management & Leadership University of San Diego I San Diego, CA Certified Nonprofit Professional (CNP) Nonprofit Leadership Alliance I San Diego, CA SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS K E A R N S W E S T Taylor Funderburk is a Senior Associate at Kearns & West in San Diego and supports public involvement and stakeholder facilitation processes for projects focused on water resources, renewable energy, climate change and resiliency, environmental conservation and policy, and community planning. Taylor's expertise includes managing projects, planning and coordinating logistics for in - person and virtual engagement events, developing project materials, and notetaking and summary writing. Taylor holds a bachelor's in Philosophy from The College of Wooster in Ohio and a master's in Nonprofit Management and Leadership from the University of San Diego. While in graduate school, she consulted for local San Diego nonprofits, providing recommendations and execution plans on topics such as community engagement, sector -issue needs assessment, and program design and evaluation. Her professional expertise includes project management for local government, foundations, and community organizations; implementing evaluations and conducting data analysis for sector trends and community needs; and event and logistics planning for trainings, workshops, or conferences (virtual and in -person) for up to 300+ participants to provide capacity building and stakeholder engagement. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE City of Newport Beach — General Plan Update Project Manager I Summer 2023 to Present Newport Beach is embarking on phase 2 of its General Plan Update. Kearns & West is working closely with City staff and the technical team to host a thorough, flexible community engagement process. Taylor is serving as the project manager. She has supported the development of the Community Engagement and Outreach plan, presenting it to the General Plan Advisory Committee for feedback and approval. Additionally, she is led the research and development of an interactive General Plan Update website. Engagement activities prioritize flexibility and adaptability to what works best for the local community. Each phase of the process will provide various opportunities for the community to get involved. Taylor and the project team stay informed on the community needs and priorities throughout the General Plan Update. Phase II of outreach was recently completed, including community workshops and digital engagement. City of Temecula — Bike Lane and Trail Program Outreach Specialist 12025 to Present Kearns & West is supporting prime, RHA, on outreach and engagement to design new mountain bike trails at Reagan Sports Park. Engagement includes a series of in -person community workshops and pop-up events where community members can provide feedback on trail alignment, uses, features, and other design elements. Community input will inform the final design of the trail network. City of Redlands — Arts and Culture Master Plan Project Manager 12024 to Present The City of Redlands is embarking on developing an Arts and Culture Master Plan. The Arts and Culture Master Plan is a hybrid public art and community cultural plan, prioritizing the City's public art program. Kearns & West is supporting the planning process by soliciting input from residents and community members of Redlands. A community engagement strategy memo was drafted and guided the development of two community workshops. Kearns & West hosted the first workshop in Fall 2024 during a local Art Fair - inviting participants to share their input and vision for the arts in their city. The second workshop is scheduled for May 2025. City of Laguna Niguel — General Plan Update Outreach Support 12023 - Present Kearns & West is conducting outreach supporting the City of Laguna Niguel General Plan Update process. Taylor has served as outreach support, working closely with the project team to identify pop-up activities, plan logistics for an Open House, and summarize findings for round 1 outreach. Taylor and the project team provided review and feedback on a mailed survey sent to Laguna Niguel's residents. City of Irvine — General Plan Update Task Lead 12022 to 2024 The City of Irvine is working to update their General Plan Update. Taylor supports the project team's coordination of meetings, outreach strategies, facilitation plans, and staffing the in -person and virtual engagement. Taylor was task lead on logistics planning for the round two engagement, where the team hosted four (4) meetings on General Plan Elements to solicit community feedback. Taylor supported drafting the summary memo of community feedback to identify key themes and ideas. County of Riverside — OHV Feasibility Study Outreach Specialist 12024 to Present The County of Riverside has re-engaged in an OHV feasibility study. The project's first phase began in 2020, pausing during the pandemic and restarting in 2024. Kearns & West coordinates and facilitates in -person and virtual meetings and web -based outreach strategies supporting the study. All outreach materials and activities are bilingual (English and Spanish) to ensure equitable opportunities for participation. San Diego County Airport Systems — Sustainability Management Plan Community Engagement Deputy Project Manager 12022 to Present Kearns & West is working with the San Diego County Airports in the creation of their Sustainability Management Plan to collectively reduce environmental impacts. Taylor served as co -project manager for the community engagement planning process for each airport. The goal was to understand surrounding communities and landscapes to inform the community outreach plan. She attended meetings with the project team in addition to creating an outreach plan and stakeholder logistic plans for each community meeting. City of Rancho Palos Verdes — Mixed -Use Overlay District (MUOD) Community Engagement Deputy Project Manager I Summer 2022 to Spring 2024 The City of Rancho Palos Verdes is proposing to establish a MUOD for select parcels primarily in the City's commercial zones. The City is in the process of collecting community input on what type of mixed -use areas the community would like to see around town. Kearns & West coordinated and facilitated community outreach opportunities with Taylor serving as the project manager and working closely with a Kearns & West Vice President to create an outreach plan, logistics plan, and to staff the in -person outreach event. San Diego County San Diego County Department of Parks and Recreation — Regional Butterflies Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Project Manager 12022 to 2023 Kearns & West is working with San Diego County on the creation of a protection and management plan to facilitate the conservation of endangered butterfly species. The final HCP will focus on four identified species and coordinate with the County's other species conservation programs. Taylor served as the project manager for the community engagement process by attending bi-weekly project team meetings, coordinating with a graphic designer to create branding for the project, and drafting a 'meeting -in -a -box' for County staff to present at the community workshop. In addition, Taylor worked closely with the project team to develop questions for a community polling activity. JAS KING SENIOR ASSOCIATE KIARNS I WEST SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Jas King (they/them), Master of Public Policy, is a Senior Associate on the Kearns & West Southern California team in the San Diego office and a core member of the Equitable and Inclusive Engagement team. Jas brings over four years of experience in participatory processes and project management, equitable community engagement, facilitation, notetaking, and project coordination for projects across California focused on land and natural resources, renewable energy, climate adaptation, local planning, and environmental review processes. Jas supports Kearns & West with public outreach and engagement, virtual meeting management, facilitation, event planning, notetaking and documentation, and .) materials development. They have extensive knowledge of and experience supporting local planning processes in California on topics related to water, land use, cultural resources, recreation, energy, and air quality. 0 San Diego, CA RELEVANT EXPERIENCE County of San Diego — Climate Action Plan Update Equity Engagement 04 JKing@kearnswest.com Community Engagement Specialist 12021 to 2022 The County of San Diego conducted intentional engagement within Environmental 4 760.690.7664 Justice Communities (EJCs) to gather input and recommendations for the Climate Action Plan. Jas assisted with coordinating and facilitating a training on equity with EXPERTISE County staff and a meeting in the Sweetwater community designed to promote dialogue, create an engaging environment, and explore opportunities and ■ Public Outreach and challenges related to greenhouse gas reduction measures in the community. They Equitable Engagement were involved in the planning of engagement with EJCs in San Diego County. ■ Project Management ■ Event Planning San Diego Community Power (SDCP) — Community Power Plan ■ Meeting Management Community -Based Organization Outreach Manager 12022 ■ Materials Development Kearns & West staff worked with SDCP to engage and gather input from communities of concern regarding their priorities, needs, and experiences of energy EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS burden. Jas led the engagement partnership with community -based organizations serving San Diego, Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, National City, Encinitas, La Mesa, BA, Sociology and Environmental and all of the County unincorporated communities. Science University of California, Irvine City of Newport Beach — General Plan Update Irvine, CA Community Engagement Specialist 12024 Newport Beach is embarking on phase 2 of its General Plan Update. Kearns & MPP, Public Policy West is working closely with City staff and the technical team to host a thorough, Oregon State University flexible community engagement process. Engagement activities prioritize flexibility Corvallis, OR and adaptability to what works best for the local community. Each phase of the process will provide various opportunities for the community to get involved. Jas supported Phase II of outreach, including community workshops and digital engagement. City of San Diego — City -Wide Inclusive Engagement Guide Focused Discussion Group Process Facilitator 12023 Led by the Planning Department in partnership with the Public Works Department and the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office, an Inclusive Engagement Guide is under development for the intended use by all City of San Diego departments. Kearns & West's role was facilitation of a "focused discussion group" process, which included support for the community application process, protocols and charge development, meeting agenda and discussion activities development, and facilitation. Jas served as facilitator for the meetings. Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) — Solid Waste and Recycling Programs Community Engagement Specialist 12021 Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Solid Waste and Recycling Programs were formed after the adoption of Assembly Bill (AB) 939, "The Integrated Waste Management Act," to regionally address the waste diversion goals in Western Riverside County. WRCOG's Solid Waste Committee (SWC) is comprised of 18 WRCOG member agencies, local waste haulers, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), and other stakeholders of interest. The SWC works with its member jurisdictions, its partners meeting quarterly to discuss solid waste and recycling issues and ways to meet requirements. To meet California requirements, jurisdictions needed to implement education, marketing, and outreach strategies to increase recycling and meet diversion rates. Kearns & West was included to design, implement and facilitate the public outreach and stakeholder engagement process. Three rounds of engagement were offered during the process. Engagement included public workshops and stakeholders' meetings designed to inform community members and stakeholders about the project and assess their vision for the project and for one or many parks that they may use. Jas supported engagement with waste and recycling processors. City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power — 100% Renewable Energy Equity Strategies Notetaker and Meeting Summary Specialist 12021 to Present Following the City of Los Angeles 100% Renewable Energy Study in 2021, the City of Los Angeles is undertaking the equitable implementation and distribution of 100% renewable energy across the City of Los Angeles. Jas led notetaking for the Steering Committee and Advisory Committee meetings. They were involved in the planning and implementation of community engagement focused on environmental justice communities. California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) — Advancing 30x30 and Climate Smart Lands Community Engagement Specialist, Facilitator 12021 to 2022 As part of the Executive Order N-82-20 to conserve 30% of lands and coastal waters by 2030, CNRA conducted collaborative and inclusive engagement processes to gather expertise on the opportunities and strategies for achieving 30X30. Jas coordinated and facilitated stakeholder and priority community engagement for regional, topical, and Advisory Committee workshops. They were involved in the planning and implementation of all engagement and materials for CNRA's Pathways to 30x30 and Climate Smart Lands strategy documents. Bay Area Air District — Community Sensing Center Strategic Advisor and Community Engagement Specialist 12021 to Present The Bay Air Center is a community resource sponsored by the Bay Area Air District that provides technical guidance, materials, and trainings to Bay Area community members and organizations, free of charge, to support their efforts to understand and improve air quality. Jas serves as a strategic advisor and community engagement specialist and is coordinating materials development for the Bay Area Air District's resource documents for the community -led sensing program. Jas has also supported a series of Spanish in -language community workshops and trainings for a community - based organization in the Bay Area and has aided in development of multilingual resources and materials. They are currently involved in all planning, management, and implementation of public engagement and website development for Bay Area community members and organizations. Santa Clarita Valley Water Inclusive Engagement Assessment and Recommendations Community Engagement Specialist 12021 Kearns & West provided support to the recently unified water agency in building community trust and relationships and reinforcing the agency's role in watershed stewardship; formulating stakeholder and public involvement plans and facilitating virtual engagement and meetings. To date, Kearns & West has developed a consolidated dashboard and communication program for six -plus plans and studies currently underway to help the public navigate involvement opportunities and understand the agency's objectives. Kearns & West has also prepared and implemented multiple logistics plans for community workshops and provided support on noticing, social media, and traditional media. They also worked closely with SCV Water staff on a series of Water Resources and Watershed Committee Meeting briefings on the need and potential methodology for integrated water planning. Kearns & West conducted research and strategy for expanding inclusive engagement techniques. Jas assisted with conducting research on inclusive engagement processes across water districts in California. EUNICE LEE SENIOR ASSOCIATE SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS K E A R N S I W E S T Eunice Lee is a Senior Associate with the Kearns & West Los Angeles team. She earned a bachelor's degree in Environmental Studies from the University of Washington. At Kearns & West, she is a co -leader of the Tribal Relations Practice Group and a member of the Equitable and Inclusive Engagement Practice Team. Eunice supports community outreach, public involvement, and stakeholder facilitation processes across energy, water, and community planning projects. She has extensive experience conducting equitable and inclusive engagement with a wide variety of stakeholders. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE City of San Marcos — General Plan Update 0 Los Angeles, California Project Coordinator 12021 to 2022 The City of San Marcos is in the process of updating its General Plan. Kearns & 0 ELee@kearnswest.com West is supporting the community engagement phase of the project, which includes several visioning workshops and pop -ups throughout the city to provide 4 213.863.0772 ample opportunities for involving San Marcos residents. Eunice created online surveys in multiple languages and compiled results. She was involved in drafting EXPERTISE summaries of the engagement events and the input received from participants. ■ Project Coordination City of Concord — Housing Element Update ■ Research & Data Analysis Project Coordinator 12021 to 2023 ■ Community Engagement The City of Concord is engaging community members to update the Housing ■ Materials Development Element of the City's General Plan. The Housing Element is a plan for meeting the ■ Notetaking and Report Writing current and future housing needs of all income levels in a community. Eunice ■ Event Planning supported the planning and execution of an equitable engagement process. She ■ Video Editing was involved in planning and coordinating virtual and in -person town halls, drafting a community input survey, and drafting summaries of engagement activities to EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS highlight community input. Additionally, Eunice managed stakeholder databases and co -led the development of outreach campaigns on MailChimp. BA, Environmental Studies University of Washington � Seattle, City of Oxnard — Climate Action and Adaptation Plan WA Project Coordinator 12021 The City of Oxnard is working on a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. Kearns & West supports engagement with community stakeholder groups. Eunice supported the coordination of stakeholder engagement meetings, provided technical facilitation, and produced meeting notes. City of Long Beach — Multipurpose Recreational and Roller Rink Land Use Plan and Engagement Associate 12022 The City of Long Beach is looking to design and develop a multi -purpose recreation area on the beach at the end of Junipero Avenue. Constituents have expressed interest in having a roller-skating rink; a multi -purpose recreation area may best serve the community with basketball courts, a roller-skating rink, and pickleball courts, allowing for diverse outdoor beach play. Eunice supported planning and implementing a community outreach pop up event and a community survey to gather feedback on possible designs for the Junipero Avenue beach courts. Additionally, she analyzed and compiled the feedback received and produced a summary. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) — State Action Wildlife Plan 2025 Update Senior Associate 12024 to Present In alignment with CDFW's mission, Kearns & West is supporting the comprehensive review of the 2015 California State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP). The SWAP describes the health of fish, wildlife, and plant resources, and recommends strategies and actions to conserve California's species and ecosystems and focuses on benefits for Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN), which allows for continued access to federal funds for conservation -oriented projects in California, through the State Wildlife Grant (SWG) Program. Eunice supported the development of the outreach materials such as flyers, factsheets, and public -facing agendas and process design of workshops with conservation partners; historically marginalized or otherwise underrepresented communities; the public; and California Native American Tribes. Southern California Edison (SCE) — Catalina Water Pipeline Project Associate - Senior Associate 12023 to 2024 Kearns & West is working with SCE to develop public engagement strategies for the Catalina Water Pipeline Project which intends to address aging water infrastructure on the Island. Eunice led the planning for online stakeholder meetings, including developing an activities and communications schedule, identifying interpreters, hosting practice meetings, and led the technology facilitation. She also supported the planning and coordination of in -person meetings, including creating logistics and meeting facilitation plans. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) — Pure Water Southern California CEQA Public Involvement Project Coordinator 12022 to 2023 MWD, in collaboration with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) has been developing the proposed Pure Water Southern California Program, which would allow up to 150 million gallons of wastewater daily to be purified and used again for potable use. Eunice supported developing a public involvement plan that guided activities and communications throughout the CEQA process. She also supported planning and coordination of a series of stakeholder meetings, led coordination and preparation with multiple interpreters, and led the technology facilitation at the stakeholder meetings. City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) — Strategic Long -Term Resource Plan (SLTRP) Project Coordinator 12022 The City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) continues engaging and involving stakeholders in shaping and forming the next steps in the transition to a clean energy future, building on the process integrated into the Los Angeles 100% Renewable Energy Study (LA100). Kearns & West supported a series of community meetings for LADWP's SLTRP. Eunice provided technical facilitation and managed the Zoom meeting platform for the community meetings. Santa Clarity Valley (SCV) Water — Engagement Gap Analysis Project Coordinator 12021 SCV Water is undertaking multiple planning efforts to effectively manage the water supply for its customers, ensuring they have access to reliable water today and tomorrow. These efforts, part of a multi -year process, will advance several regional water plans and programs that enhance water reliability, quality, environmental sustainability, and delivery. Kearns & West is supporting SCV Water with stakeholder engagement and exploration of CEQA public involvement for several projects including an Urban Water Management Plan Update, Water Shortage Contingency Plan, and Recycled Water Planning. Eunice was involved in conducting community characteristics research and gathering census track data that she used to create maps to visualize the data. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) — Technical Assistance Grant Project Coordinator 12022 Eunice collaborated closely with DTSC to coordinate a stakeholder engagement meeting using a polling platform to gather community input. She produced files of graphs and tables summarizing the data gathered from the stakeholder meeting. CITY OF TEMECULA ■ CLIMATE ACTION PLAN DEPARTMENT MANAGER - PLANNING Eddie G. Torres ElMr. Torres leads Michael Baker's efforts to be at the forefront of Global Climate Change studies. Mr. Torres has prepared numerous analyses that are consistent with climate change legislation such as Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 97, Executive Order S-3-05, and Senate Bill 375. In addition to analyzing climate change impacts, Mr. Torres has led the development of numerous greenhouse gas inventory models which calculate greenhouse gas emissions from such sources as vehicular traffic, stationary sources, electricity consumption, water consumption, wastewater treatment, and construction processes. Mr. Torres also has rich experience in climate action planning, using her technical and analytical skills to provide climate change and environmental due diligence services to local governments and regional jurisdictions. She is proficient in utilizing climate change tools to develop GHG inventories and climate action plans (CAP) and recommending sustainability strategies and programs to local governments. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE County of Riverside 2025 Climate Action Plan Update. County of Riverside, California. Project Director. Mr. Torres is the project director and technical lead on County of Riverside 2025 CAP Update. Michael Baker in helping the County of Riverside updating its CAP in compliance with the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan adopted by the California Air Resources Board in December 2022. This project is a continuous work of the County's 2019 CAP Update. The project scope also includes development of consistency checklists to enable developers to easily understand how to use the plan as a CEQA tiering document and CEQA review to allow the plan to be a qualified GHG reduction plan under CEQA Section 15183.5. D I N T E R N AT 10 N AL Years with Michael Baker 25 Years of Experience 25 Education M.S., 2005, Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California B.S., 2000, Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Irvine B.A., 2000, Environmental Analysis and Design, University of California, Irvine Certificate, 2000, Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Irvine Licenses/Certifications Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2002 2.1.1 Traffic Noise Analysis, California 2.2.1 Air Quality Analysis, California Professional Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) Institute of Noise Control Engineering Fullerton Climate Action Plan (CAP), Fullerton, California. City of Fullerton. Environmental Specialist. CAP Project Manager. Michael Baker prepared a climate action plan (CAP) for the City of Fullerton in conjunction with the city's general plan update and accompanying environmental impact report. Michael Baker established the target greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal, guide the development of CAP measures. Michael Baker then reviewed the city's land -use data associated with the general plan update and used this data to prepare a citywide inventory of the emissions from both direct and indirect sources. Michael Baker developed measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and provided quantified estimates of the reduction measure's effectiveness. Michael Baker also developed criteria for addressing subsequent developments' consistency with the CAP and a methodology for determining significance of future project climate change impacts. General Plan Update, EIR, and Climate Action Plan, Murrieta, California. City of Murrieta. Environmental Specialist. Responsible for technical studies. Michael Baker provided a comprehensive update to the city's 1994 General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The City Council's major priority with the update was to focus on economic development and adding more jobs, specifically high - paying skilled jobs, along with retail establishments to support the community. Michael Baker also prepared a climate action plan (CAP). South Gate General Plan Update EIR and Citywide GHG Inventory/Reduction Plan, South Gate, California. Air Quality/Noise Manager. As part of the air quality and climate change analysis, Michael Baker performed an extensive greenhouse gas, GHG) inventory for the City of South Gate. Michael Baker quantified GHG emissions for existing and projected 2035 General Plan Buildout conditions. Quantified GHGs included carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane, produced from mobile and stationary sources within the City. Michael Baker quantified GHG emissions for direct and indirect emissions utilizing City land use, traffic, energy consumption, water supply, and solid waste data. Michael Baker utilized proprietary models and emission quantification software in conjunction with these data to perform GHG inventories. Michael Baker also prepared a quantified reduction plan to ensure that forecast Year 2035 GHGs fell below the targeted reductions promulgated by Assembly Bill 32. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 1 OF 1 CITY OF TEMECULA ■ CLIMATE ACTION PLAN PROJECT MANAGER Zhe Chen. MBA PkMs. Chen is a project manager and senior climate change specialist. She has rich experience in climate action planning, using her technical and analytical skills to provide climate change and environmental due diligence services to local governments and regional jurisdictions. She is proficient in utilizing climate change tools to develop GHG inventories and Climate Action Plans (CAP), recommending sustainability strategies and programs to local governments, and performing climate risk, vulnerability, and adaptation assessment. Ms. Chen is also qualified to prepare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents for public and private clients, especially Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas (GHG), Energy, and Noise technical reports and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) sections. She is an expert in air quality, GHG, and noise modeling, including California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), the AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling System, the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model (TNM), etc. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE County of Riverside 2025 Climate Action Plan Update. County of Riverside, INTERNATIONAL Years with Michael Baker 5 Years of Experience 10 Education M.B.A, 2023, Business Administration, University of California, Irvine M.S., 2015, Environmental Engineering and Science, Stanford University B.S., 2013, Chemistry, Peking University Licenses/Certifications LEED Green Associate, U.S. Green Building Council Certified Associate in Project Management, Project Management Institute California. Project Manager. Ms. Chen is the project manager and technical lead on County of Riverside 2025 CAP Update. Michael Baker in helping the County of Riverside updating its CAP in compliance with the 2022 Climate Change Scoping Plan adopted by the California Air Resources Board in December 2022. This project is a continuous work of the County's 2019 CAP Update. The project scope also includes development of consistency checklists to enable developers to easily understand how to use the plan as a CEQA tiering document and CEQA review to allow the plan to be a qualified GHG reduction plan under CEQA Section 15183.5. City of Corona Climate Action Plan Update and Vulnerability Analysis. City of Corona, California. Assistant Project Manager and Senior Climate Change Specialist. Ms. Chen was the assistant project manager and technical lead on City of Corona CAP Update and Vulnerability Analysis. This project included screening tables in implementing the reduction strategies, which provide a legally defensible document that future projects can tier from in the analysis of climate change during the CEQA process. For the implementation and monitoring of the CAP, Ms. Chen directly worked with the City's IT Department and developed their CAP Monitoring Program that works within the Permit Application (eTRAKiT) software and provided a webpage CAP Monitoring dashboard that automatically updates whenever new entries are made for permit applications. In addition, Ms. Chen led the mapping and modeling of climate risk and vulnerability analysis, which served as the basis for the City's General Plan Update Safety Element. San Bernardino County Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Update. San Bernardino County, California. Assistant Project Manager and Senior Climate Change Specialist. Ms. Chen served as assistant project manager and technical lead on San Bernardino County GHG Reduction Plan Update. The project team developed an interactive tool kit for the 25 jurisdictions in the County to adapt the reduction measures to their unique needs. Ms. Chen led technical works on GHG inventories, forecasts, reduction measures, and tool kit development. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Sustainability Engineering Services. Los Angeles, California. Climate Change Specialist. Responsible for the GHG emissions inventory and climate vulnerability and adaptation analysis. Ms. Chen served as technical analyst helping LA Metro with their sustainability strategies, working closely and collaboratively with LA Metro Environmental Compliance and Sustainability Department staff to realize sustainability program objectives, such as to identify climate change vulnerability and to incorporate design resiliency into the transit line and transit stops that serve transit -dependent populations within the County. She was responsible for analyzing Metro's GHG inventories and reduction strategies, updating the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and analyzing climate risks on Metro's rail lines and critical facilities using Cal -Adapt dataset under the environment of ArcGIS. Energy Climate Action Plan. Oceanside, California. Climate Change Specialist. Ms. Chen served as technical analyst helping the City of Oceanside develop an Energy Climate Action Plan. She reviewed technical works on inventories, forecasts, and reduction measures provided by the Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC) and drafted chapters of the energy CAP. The energy portion of the CAP was funded by the San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) Emerging Cities Program. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL ■ PAGE 1 OF 1 SOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION M.F.A., Historic Preservation, Savannah College of Art and Design, Savannah, Georgia, 2004 B.A., History, Bridgewater College, Bridgewater, Virginia, 2002 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS California Preservation Foundation Los Angeles Conservancy Society of Architectural Historians National Trust for Historic Preservation Santa Barbara Historical Museum Email: scorder@southenvironmental.com Mobile: 760-334-3355 Sarah Corder, MFA PRINCIPAL ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN Sarah Corder is the Principal Architectural Historian at South Environmental with 20 years' experience in all elements of cultural resources management, including project management, historic preservation planning, rehabilitation of historic buildings, community engagement, intensive -level field investigations, citywide surveys, architectural history studies, and historical significance evaluations in consideration of the NRHP, CRHR, and local -level evaluation criteria. Sarah has conducted thousands of historical resource evaluations and developed detailed historic context statements for a multitude of property types and architectural styles, including private residential, commercial, military, industrial, educational, recreational, civic, and agricultural properties. Sarah has also worked closely with design teams, property owners, and agencies on numerous projects that required conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards) and local design guidelines. Sarah exceeds the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for both Architectural History and History. She has extensive experience preparing environmental compliance documentation in support of projects that fall under the CEQA/NEPA, and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Sarah also has extensive experience consulting with lead agencies and managing large scale projects for municipalities like the City of Coronado, the City of San Diego, and the County of Los Angeles. EXPERTISE • CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 of the NHPA compliance documentation in consideration of impacts to historical resources, and historic properties. • Large scale historic resources survey management and execution. • Large scale historic context statement development. • Community engagement. • Resource significance evaluations in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and local designation criteria. • Project design review for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. 0 Sarah Corder, MFA Resume, Page 2 PROJECT EXPERIENCE Cultural Resources Assessment for the Riverside Alive Project, City of Riverside, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources assessment for the Riverside Alive Project located in the downtown area of the City of Riverside, California. This study included a CHRIS records search; a California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File search; an intensive -level pedestrian survey of the project site and surrounding areas by a qualified cultural resources specialist; and analysis of potential project -related indirect impacts to historical resources. Ms. Corder served as the principal architectural historian for the project and prepared the historic built environment impacts assessment Cultural Resources Assessment for 42175 Stetson Avenue Project, Riverside County, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to contribute to a cultural resources assessment for the 42175 Stetson Avenue Project in Riverside County, California. The historic built environment components of the report included the results of an intensive -level pedestrian survey of the project site; building development and archival research; and recordation and evaluation of the property for historical significance in consideration of federal, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements. Ms. Corder served as the principal architectural historian, co-authored the report, and provided QA/QC of all project deliverables Historic Resources Technical Report for the 5261 Arlington Avenue Project, City of Riverside, California (2022). While working at a previous firm, Ms. Corder prepared a historic resources technical report for a Sears department store designed by Charles Luckman and Associates in 1964. The project included an intensive -level, pedestrian survey of the project site; building development and archival research; and recordation and evaluation of one commercial property for historical significance in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and local criteria and integrity requirements. As a result of the property significance evaluation, the property was recommended eligible for NRHP, CRHR, and local designation. Ms. Corder served as the principal architectural historian for the project, co-authored the technical report, and provided QA/QC on all project deliverables. Historic Resources Technical Report for the Riverside City College Life Science/Physical Science Reconstruction Project, City of Riverside, California (2020). While working at a previous firm, Ms. Corder prepared a historic resources technical report for multiple campus buildings and a historic age mural located on the Riverside City College campus. The project included an intensive -level, pedestrian survey of the project site; building development and archival research; and recordation and evaluation of one property for historical significance in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and local criteria and integrity requirements. As a result of the property significance evaluation, the mural was recommended eligible for NRHP, CRHR, and local designation. Ms. Corder served as the principal architectural historian for the project, co-authored the technical report, developed a protection plan for the mural, and provided QA/QC on all project deliverables. City of Coronado As -Needed Historic Research Consultant, City of Coronado, California (2024- ongoing). South Environmental is currently working with the City of Coronado Community Development Department to provide historic built environment consultation services on an as -needed basis. The current contract includes the following services: historic resources surveys; archival research; preparation of determination of significance reports in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and City of Coronado designation criteria; and attendance at public meetings. Ms. Corder serves as the principal architectural historian and contract manager and she provides QA/QC of all project deliverables. SOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION M.A., Anthropology, California State University, Los Angeles, 2013 B.A., Anthropology, California State University, Northridge, 2003 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS California Preservation Foundation National Trust for Historic Preservation PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Registered Professional Archaeologist (2013) Email: smurray@southenvironmental.com Mobile: 818-458-1162 Samantha Murray, MA, RPA CULTURAL RESOURCES DIRECTOR Samantha Murray is the cultural resources director and archaeological principal investigator at South Environmental with over 18 years' experience in all elements of cultural resources management, including project management, archaeology and architectural history studies, and significance evaluations in consideration of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and local -level designation criteria. Ms. Murray has conducted thousands of Phase I archaeological studies, historical resource evaluations, and has developed detailed historic context statements for a multitude of property types and architectural styles. She has also provided expertise on numerous projects requiring conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Ms. Murray meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for both Archaeology and History. She is experienced managing multidisciplinary projects in the lines of private development, transportation, transmission and generation, federal land management, land development, and state and local government. She is an expert in preparation of cultural resources compliance documentation for projects that fall under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Ms. Murray has also served as an expert witness in legal proceedings concerning historical resources under CEQA and local ordinance protection. EXPERTISE • CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 of the NHPA compliance documentation in consideration of impacts to historical, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources, and historic properties. • Resource significance evaluations in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and local designation criteria. • Project design review for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. • Assistance with complex mitigation including HABS/HAER/HALS, salvage, and interpretive displays. • Peer review. 0 Samantha Murray, MA, RPA Resume, Page 2 RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Market Street Triangle Project, Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources study for this project that would develop a 3.08-acre vacant site into a convenience store, drive-thru restaurant, gas station, and self -serve drive-thru carwash. The project was subject to CEQA. Ms. Murray served as Principal Investigator and Project Manager, overseeing all cultural resources work for this project. Spruce Grove Project, Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources study for this project that would develop a 20.13-acre vacant site into commercial and multifamily residential buildings. The project was subject to CEQA. Ms. Murray served as Principal Investigator and Project Manager, overseeing all cultural resources work for this project. Riverside Alive Project, City of Riverside, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources study for this project at the existing Riverside Convention Center that would include a combination of residential, office, retail, hotel, Convention Center expansion, and new parking facilities. The project was subject to CEQA. Ms. Murray served as Principal Investigator and Project Manager, overseeing all cultural resources work for this project. Southwest Trailers Project, Mead Valley, Riverside County, California (2024). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources study for this project that would develop a 16-acre vacant site into a storage and maintenance facility specifically designed for truckload freight trailers. Ms. Murray served as Principal Investigator and Project Manager, overseeing all cultural resources work for this project subject to CEQA. EMWD Mead Valley Sewer Project, Mead Valley, Riverside County, California (2023). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources assessment of Alignment 1 for the proposed project. The study included the results of a California Historical Resources Information Center (CHRIS) records search of the project site and a one -mile radius from the Eastern Information Center (EIC); a NAHC Sacred Lands File search and informational scoping letters to local tribes; a paleontological resources records search; and an intensive pedestrian survey of the project site by a qualified archaeologist. Ms. Murray served as the Archaeological Principal Investigator and co-author of the technical report. San Jacinto Avenue Connectivity Project, City of Perris, Riverside County, California (2023). South Environmental was retained to complete a cultural resources technical report in compliance with CEQA for the proposed project located in the City of Perris, Riverside County, California. The study included the results of a CHRIS records search of the project site and a one -mile radius; a California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File search and informational letters to local tribes; a paleontological resources records search; and an intensive pedestrian survey of the Project site by a qualified archaeologist. Ms. Murray served as the Archaeological Principal Investigator and lead author of the technical report. Chacon Farms Project, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California (2023). South Environmental was retained to prepare an historic built environment assessment report in support of the Chacon Farms Project in the City of San Jacinto, California. One built environment resource over 45 years old was identified within the project site: a residential farm located at 710 Cawston Avenue North comprising several buildings and structures. The property was recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of DPR Forms in consideration of CRHR and City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Ms. Murray provided review of all final deliverables. EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Cost for services shall be as per Consultant's proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $1,932,531.70 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 11 01/01/2025 TASK/ACTIVITY Principal/ Project Manager Principal Planner Senior Planner+ Urban Designer Associate Planner/ Assistant PM Assistant Planner/ GIS De Novo Subtotals Traffic Design CAP Economics Outreach Cultural I Infrastructure Direct Costs ACTIVITY TOTALS Fehr & Peers JZMK Partners Michael Baker International EPS Kearns & West Environmental South Fuscoe Printin g/ Mailing/ Translation TOTALS Hours $185 Hours $160 Hours $125 Hours $115 Hours $100 Hours Fee Fee TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION 1.1: Kick-off Meeting and Tour 8 $1,480 8 $1,280 8 $1,000 8 $920 0 $0 32 $4,680 $2,840 $7,520 1.2: Audit of Existing City Plans 16 $2,960 24 $3,840 0 $0 40 $4,600 60 $6,000 140 $17,400 $10,030 $10,000 $37,430 1.3: Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Market Study 12 $2,220 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,220 $35,000 $37,220 1.4: Existing Conditions Report 60 $11,100 24 $3,840 100 $12,500 160 $18,400 280 $28,000 624 $73,840 $39,510 $20,000 $18,317 $151,667 TASK 1 SUBTOTAL 96 $17,760 56 $8,960 108 $13,500 208 $23,920 340 $34,000 808 $98,140 $52,380 $30,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $18,317 $0 $233,837 TASK 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLIC OUTREACH 2.1: Community Outreach Program 8 $1,480 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 $1,480 $7,130 $8,610 2.2: Graphic Identity Template 20 $3,700 0 $0 40 $5,000 0 $0 0 $0 60 $8,700 $5,715 $14,415 2.3: Digital Engagement 40 $7,400 0 $0 100 $12,500 24 $2,760 0 $0 164 $22,660 $5,198 $30,120 $1,500 $59,478 2.4: Direct Mailer 6 $1,110 0 $0 24 $3,000 0 $0 0 $0 30 $4,110 $17,000 $21,110 2.5: Visioning Workshops and Open Houses 40 $7,400 0 $0 0 $0 64 $7,360 64 $6,400 168 $21,160 $2,950 $20,000 $8,338 $72,273 $8,000 $132,721 2.6: Pop-up Events 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 20 $2,300 0 $0 20 $2,300 $5,040 $1,000 $8,340 2.7: General Plan Advisory Committee 48 $8,880 16 $2,560 16 $2,000 80 $9,200 60 $6,000 220 $28,640 $13,110 $8,370 $1,200 $51,320 2.8: Stakeholder Interviews 22 $4,070 4 $640 0 $0 22 $2,530 0 $0 48 $7,240 $7,240 2.9: Vision Document 24 $4,440 0 $0 60 $7,500 0 $0 0 $0 84 $11,940 $1,950 $1,100 $14,990 2.10: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 100 $18,500 40 $6,400 0 $0 100 $11,500 0 $0 240 $36,400 $11,760 $20,000 $14,088 $11,700 $93,948 TASK 2 SUBTOTAL 308 $56,980 60 $9,600 240 $30,000 310 $35,650 124 $12,400 1042 $144,630 $29,770 $40,000 $27,624 $11,700 $128,648 $0 $0 $29,800 $412,172 TASK 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 3.1: Alternative Preparation and Evaluation 40 $7,400 16 $2,560 60 $7,500 100 $11,500 80 $8,000 296 $36,960 $36,200 $40,000 1 1 1 $113,160 3.2: Fiscal Impact Analysis 16 $2,960 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 16 $2,960 $17,460 $20,420 3.3 Preferred Land Use Plan Development 24 $4,440 8 $1,280 16 $2,000 24 $2,760 40 $4,000 112 $14,480 $14,480 TASK 3 SUBTOTAL 80 $14,800 24 $3,840 76 $9,500 124 $14,260 120 $12,000 424 $54,400 $36,200 $40,000 $0 $17,460 $0 $0 $0 $0 $148,060 TASK 4: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 4.1: Framework (Goals, Policies, and Programs) 100 $18,500 60 $9,600 80 $10,000 260 $29,900 100 $10,000 600 $78,000 $6,000 $15,960 $3,720 $103,680 4.2: General Plan Update 60 $11,100 40 $6,400 120 $15,000 80 $9,200 120 $12,000 420 $53,700 $49,720 $60,000 $5,000 $168,420 4.3: Summary of Zoning and Specific Plan Recommendations 24 $4,440 36 $5,760 60 $7,500 80 $9,200 0 $0 200 $26,900 $2,180 $30,000 $59,080 TASK 4 SUBTOTAL 184 $34,040 136 $21,760 260 $32,500 420 $48,300 220 $22,000 1220 $158,600 $57,900 $90,000 $0 $15,960 $0 $0 $3,720 $5,000 $331,180 TASK 5: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 5.1: Literature Review of Planning Documents and Regulations 2 $370 4 $640 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $1,010 $5,952 $6,962 5.2: GHG Emissions Forecast and Reduction Target -Setting 6 $1,110 12 $1,920 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $3,030 $5,4201 $8,794 $17,244 5.3: GHG Emission Reduction Measures Development 6 $1,110 12 $1,920 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 18 $3,030 $4,070 $18,250 7 $25,350 5.4: Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Measures 4 $740 8 $1,280 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,020 $17,152 $19,172 5.5: Climate Action Plan Preparation 4 $740 8 $1,280 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12 $2,020 $19,928 $21,948 5.6: Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting 0 $0 2 $320 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 $320 $15,6401 $15,960 TASK 5 SUBTOTALI 22 $4,070 46 $7,360 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 s0 $11,430 $9,490 $0 $85,716 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,636 TASK 6: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & CECW DOCUMENTS or 6.1: EIR Notice of Preparation and Scoping 6.1.1: Notice of Preparation 4 $740 12 $1,920 20 $2,500 16 $1,840 16 $1,600 68 $8,600 $500 $9,100 6.1.2: Scoping Meeting $0 12 $1,920 12 $1,500 8 $920 2 $200 34 $4,540 $250 $4,790 6.1.3: Native American Consultation $0 8 $1,280 8 $1,000 $0 8 $800 24 $3,080 $150 $3,230 6.2: Preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR 80 $14,800 300 $48,000 360 $45,000 280 $32,200 260 $26,000 1280 $166,000 $10,310 $15,575 $20,414 $212,299 6.3: Preparation of the Revised Draft and Draft EIR 60 $11,100 150 $24,000 180 $22,500 140 $16,100 140 $14,000 670 $87,700 $1,500 $89,200 6.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 40 $7,400 40 $6,400 401 5,000 32 $3,680 32 $3,200 184 $25,680 $5001 $26,180 6.5: Notice of Determination 1 $0 2 $320 1 $0 $0 2 $200 4 $520 1 1 $50 $570 TASK 6 SUBTOTAL 184 $34,040 524 $83,840 620 $77,500 476 $54,740 460 $46,000 2264 $296,120 $10,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,575 $20,414 $2,9501 $345,369 TASK 7: PROJECT MANAGEMENT 7.1: Meetings with City Staff 100 $18,500 40 $6,400 40 $5,000 100 $11,500 0 $0 280 $41,400 $41,400 7.2: Project Administration 48 $8,880 48 $7,680 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 96 $16,560 $27,712 $16,4161 $47,965 $7,060 $115,713 TASK 7 SUBTOTAL 148 $27,380 88 $14,0801 40 $5,000 100 $11,500 0 $0 376 $57,960 $27,712 $0 $16,4161 $0 $47,965 $0 $7,060 $0 $157,113 Subtotals 1,022 $ 189,070 934 $ 149,440 1,344 $ 168,000 1,638 $ 188,370 1,264 $ 126,400 6,184 FEE (NOT TO 1' • TOTAL• • EXCEED, WITH CONTINGENCY)1 $ 821,280 $ 223,762 $ 200,000 $ 129,756 $ 80,120 $ 176,613 $ 15,575 $ 49,511 $ 37,750 $ 1,734,367 :14 TASK/ACTIVITY Principal/ Project Manager Principal Planner Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner/ GIS De Novo Subtotals Traffic Design CAP Economics Outreach Cultural Infrastructure Direct Costs ACTIVITY TOTALS Fehr & Peers JZMK Partners Michael Baker International EPS Kearns & West South Environmental Fuscoe Printin g/ Mailing/ Translation TOTALS Hours $185 Hours $160 Hours $125 Hours $115 Hours $100 Hours Fee Fee OPA: Sol Economic Analysis 1 12 $2,220 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 0 $01 0 $2,2201 1 1 1 $11,7001 1 1 $13,920 OP.2: Two Additional GPAC Meetings 116 $2,9601 01 Sol 8 $1,000 40 $4,600 0 $01 0 $8,5601 1 1 1 1 1 1 1$8,560 De Novo hourly rates represent fully burdened rates. Subconsultants and Direct Costs are billed at no markup. De Novo Planning Group reserves the right to reallocate budget between various consulting team members and between tasks, provided the overall project budget does not change. De Novo Planning Group 64 General Plan Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 (COMPLETE) (COMPLETE) (JAN. 2023 - DEC. 2024) (JAN. 2025 — DEC. 2027) QLMP 2030 UPDATE - DEVELOP A REQUEST FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE HOUSING ELEMENT PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR GENERAL PLAN f � BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE . I GOVT. CODE SECTION 65580-65589 FOUNDATION FOR THE GENERAL PLAN CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP) - AB32 a ORGANIZING VISION FOR THE GENERAL PLAN GENERAL PLAN UPDATE STAFF ASSIG NM ENTS o r����� GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE(GPAC) VEHICLE MILES TRAVELLED 1 CORE VALUES EIR QLMP 1 SCOPE OF WORK - i o 1 #1 HEALTHY & LIVABLE CITY 1 CONSULTANT SELECTION - CLI MATE ACTION PLAN -AB32 o i (SB743) 1 #2 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY 1 o o #3 SAFE & PREPARED COMMUNITY 1 #4 SUSTAINABLE CITY 1 #5TRANSPORTATION, MOBILITY& CONNECTIVITY LAND USE ECONOMIC PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT 1 #6ACCOUNTABLE & RESPONSIBLE CITY GOVT. 1 /� 1 #7 FUTURE EQUITY ELEMENT 1 ! OPPORTUNITY STUDY LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN (LHMP) -SB379 6-9 MONTHS (OVERLAPS W/ PHASE 2) DISASTER PLANNING -AB747 EVAC. ROUTES-5699 DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS CLIMATE ACTION N4 PLAN (CAP) BASELINE ANALYSIS 0 �= COMPLETE STREETS POLICY DOCUMENT �j QLIVIP CORE VALUES ARE THE FOUNDATION FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE QLMP CORE VALUE 1 HEALTHY & LIVABLE CI #2 ECON. PROSPERITY #3 SAFE & PREPARED #4 SUSTAINABLE CITY #5 TRANSP. MOBILITY & #6 ACCOUNTABLE & #7 FUTURE EQUITY COMMUNITY CONNECTIVITY ELEMENT RESPONSIBLE CITY GOV. GP ELEMENTS GP ELEMENTS GP ELEMENTS GP ELEMENTS GP ELEMENTS GP ELEMENTS ENV. JUSTICE LAND USE ECON. DEV. PUBLIC SAFETY CONSERVATION CIRCULATION GROWTH MGT. + PUBLIC HOUSING NOISE OPEN SPACE COMPLETE STREETS (ATP) FACILITIES COMMUNITY DESIGN AIR QUALITY (CLIMATE ENV. JUSTICE ACTION PLAN) U:\wak Ing\waaa cbe\wa c\ VICE\ Upd.-1/21/2U26 AU d23f0�Y_ c-6125-0319 a5f9- 6�29�26926\ Alk The ]-year[ aF Soui here Cali Fornia Wine Country COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Infrastructure Project Project Description: California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive General Plan as the fundamental policy document for future development. It provides the framework for management and utilization of the City's physical, economic, and human resources. This document guides civic decisions regarding land use, conservation of existing housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provisions of supporting infrastructure and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human - caused hazards. The City's General Plan was last updated in 2005. The General Plan will serve as the blueprint for the community for approximately the next fifteen years. This project will update all of the elements of the General Plan and will also include the implementation of new legislation to ensure compliance with State Law. Benefit: The General Plan update satisfies all six of the City's core values: Healthy and Livable City; Economic Prosperity; Safe and Prepared Community; Sustainable City; Transportation, Mobility, and Connectivity; and Accountable and Responsive Local Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: The project is underway. A General Plan consultant was hired to manage the project starting in January of 2025. A request for proposal (RFP) and contract award are expected in 2025. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-02 / 777 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program 2025-26 Prior Years 2024-25 Proposed 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 560,441 1,119,559 1,680,000 5802-Design & Environmental 49,517 1,320,483 500,000 1,870,000 Total Expenditures 609,958 2,440,042 500,000 3,550,000 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 4025-Grants 1,057,141 310,000 1,182,859 500,000 500,000 2,740,000 810,000 Total Funding 1,367,141 1,682,859 500,000 3,550,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 122 Alk The ]-year[ aF Soui here Cali Fornia Wine Country COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2026-30 Capital Improvement Program 2025-26 Prior Years 2024-25 Proposed 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project Project Cost: I Actuals I Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. Grants funding includes: $500,000 in Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP) funding provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and $310,000 in Senate Bill 2 Planning Grant. 2. In addition to these grants, $175,000 in funding has been granted through the Sustainable Communities Program, which supplemented Planning Department operating funds to start the General Plan update process and was reflected in account001.161.999.5248. This grant was used for CEQA VMT analysis for Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, as required by SB743. 123 Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Receive Presentation Regarding Alternatives to Evening City Council Meetings (At the Request of Mayor Kalfus) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive a presentation regarding alternatives to evening City Council meetings and provide general direction regarding the same. BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2025, the City Council unanimously placed an item related to alternatives to evening Council meetings on a future agenda at the request of Mayor Kalfus. Council asked staff to conduct preliminary research on the matter. Tonight, staff will present the results of that research. Staff will receive general direction from City Council at tonight's meeting, implement administrative changes as needed, evaluate any changes to existing resolutions and/or ordinances, and return to Council for formal approval, if needed, at a future Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report PREPARED BY: Luisa Tovar, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Councial receive and file report. On April 23, 24, 25, 2025, Mayor Brenden Kalfus, Mayor Pro Tern Jessica Alexander, and Council Member James Stewart traveled to Sacramento, CA to attend the Cal Cities City Leaders Summit Conference. Included in this conference was advocacy/lobbying briefing with State officials on City priorities as well as meetings with State officials in Housing and Transportation. ATTACHMENTS: Itineraries _ T' as � � .- ...�....r.. SrGcar0, FLOOR PLAN Entrance Hyatt Regency Take advantage of Visit Sacramento's Badge Pass program to receive discounts at local restaurants and attractions • .MM M\ • ■oo 1 .■ .M.. ... .\•\ ■ .... • ..... . ......................... ... .... • . •• . •• ..... ...... . . • . ........ u. 09960606 ■sncn •wE w.c •• •• • • H : •: \:. BADGE ••a :•• • ■: •. M • •. H.■ •• • • •M■■ SASS ■ ■■ ■ ■ ...;....* . •:••: ::■ . ■. • • • M • ■ .■ . ■■ • ■o. ■ • ■1f ■■■ • • ■■ ■■ ■ ■f:• f: so :: • : ■ :•\ • • • f ■f ■• • ■ •■ • IB see so 400 `340 ah 0: a 1: pdr�r�� y League of California Cities 2025 City Leaders Summit CONFERENCE INFORMATION �1 NETWORK I PASSWORD City Leaders Calcities25 DOWNLOAD THE APP! The Cal Cities mobile app provides a personalized conference experience with access a_ to the full program, key updates, a customized schedule, and more. Download through _ your device's app store by searching "League of California Cities" or "Cal Cities." Once downloaded, select "Find Guides" and search for 2025 City Leaders Summit. Don't forget s -7- to allow push notifications to receive up-to-date conference information. CPRESENTATIONS AND MATERIALS EC4 _ Looking for presentation slides and session materials? All materials submitted are posted PRESENTATIONS as they are received and can be found online at www.calcities.org/CLS or within the app under the "session materials" tab. VISIT OUR SPONSORS! on Sponsors will be set up in Prefunction A on Thursday only. Make sure to schedule time to say hello and learn what all of our sponsors have to offer. WEAR YOUR BADGE! Please remember to wear your attendee badge at all times as this is your admission ticket to all sessions, meals, and receptions. If you lose or damage yours, please visit the registration desk for a new one. SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS! Send us your feedback on the summit by May 9 by scanning this QR code. SAVE THE DATES: 202S ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND EXPO OCTOBER 8-10 LONG BEACH CONVENTION CENTER 2026 MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ACADEMY JANUARY 21-23 SACRAMENTO League of California Cities 2 2025 City Leaders Summit WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23 9:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Registration Open Ballroom A Pre -Function 10:00-11:15 a.m. Opening General Session Ballroom Al 11:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. 12:15 - 2:00 p.m. Opening Remarks: Lynne B. Kennedy, President, League of California Cities and Mayor Pro Tem, Rancho Cucamonga Carolyn Coleman, Executive Director and CEO, League of California Cities Day one of the conference focuses on legislative advocacy. Join Cal Cities leadership and lobbyists for an update on high priority legislation that you will want to advocate on when you meet with legislative officers later in the day. Moderator. Jason Rhine, Senior Director of Legislative Affairs, League of California Cities Speakers: League of California Cities Advocacy Team Member Rally and Press Conference Capitol Park near L Street, between 13th and 14th Streets Join Cal Cities leadership and other city officials for a rally and press conference urging the Governor and Legislature to support Cal Cities' three budget priorities: ongoing funding to prevent and reduce homelessness, implementation of the voter -approved Prop 36, and protecting voter -approved funding obligations in Prop. 4, the Climate Bond. Together, we will make a unified call for the state to listen to voters, fund what matters, and protect our cities! Lunch on Your Own For your convenience, lunch will be available for purchase at a food truck in the SAFE Credit Union Convention Center Plaza. League of California Cities 2 2025 City Leaders Summit 12:15 - 5:00 p.m. 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23 Lobbying at the Capitol Legislative Sessions Ballroom Al Proposition 36 Implementation: Where Are We Now? (200-245p.m.) Last November, California's voters overwhelming passed Proposition 36 with a 70% approval rating — making it clear they want action to address growing rates of retail theft and substance use disorder. However, in January, the state's proposed budget notably did not make any major investments toward funding the implementation of Proposition 36, leaving many wondering how implementation can be achieved. This panel will focus on what is needed to implement Proposition 36, how the measure has impacted various aspects of our criminal justice system so far, and how our cities can get involved. Homeless Encampments: State and Local Strategies (245 - 330 p.m.) Cities across California are grappling with the growing challenge of homeless encampments, working to balance the needs of unhoused residents, public safety concerns, and legal requirements. As policies continue to evolve, local governments are developing innovative approaches to address this complex issue while facing resource constraints, community expectations, and shifting legal frameworks. This panel will explore how cities are responding, highlight best practices, and examine the path forward as state and local policies continue to shape the landscape of homelessness response efforts. California State Budget: Potential Outcomes of Federal Budget Cuts (5.45 - 4.75 p.m.) Under normal circumstances, this year's budget should be significantly easier for the Governor and Legislature to tackle. However, the new federal administration has signaled that federal funding directed at California may be paused or withheld all together unless policy changes are made to reflect the views of the federal administration. California currently receives around $150 billion in federal funding, mainly to support health and human services programs. Additionally, California needs FEMA funding to support communities and individuals in the aftermath of the devastating fires in the Los Angeles area. This panel will take a deep dive into how dependent the state's budget is on federal funding and explore possible outcomes if federal dollars are withheld. Wildfires and Disasters: The Path to Preparedness and the Road to Recovery (495-500p.m) Three-quarters of California cities are now in fire hazard severity zones. Many city officials and leaders are asking: How can our city prepare for the next catastrophic wildfire? From cities tucked in mountainous terrain to the urban interface, communities are concerned about the increased pace and scale of wildfires. But fires are not the only disasters plaguing cities — floods, drought, sea level rise, earthquakes, and extreme heat are all too familiar in California. This panel will equip cities with practical tips on how to plan ahead, prepare for disasters, and navigate the road to recovery. Legislative Reception sponsored by <CAL CITIES PARTNER Cafeteria 15L, 1116 15th Street In partnership with the California State Association of Counties, please join us for an evening reception. Enjoy some light hors d'oeuvres and refreshments while networking with your city and county colleagues. League of California Cities 2025 City Leaders Summit THURSDAY, APRIL 24 7:30 a.m. - a:00 p.m. Registration Open Ballroom A Pre -Function 7:30a.m.-5:00p.m. Elite Sponsor Tables Open Ballroom A Pre -Function 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Networking Breakfast Ballroom Al 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Aligning Goal Setting and the Performance Evaluation Process: Best Practices to Concurrent Session Retain Top Executive Talent Ballroom Al This session will dive into innovative, practical strategies for setting clear goals and conducting effective performance evaluations for appointed officials like city managers, city attorneys, and city clerks. Elected city leaders will discover streamlined techniques for facilitating alignment between council priorities and managerial execution, leading to a more cohesive leadership team and improved retention. Learn best practices to simplify and enhance the performance review process including the contract negotiation component, resulting in a supportive environment where roles are clear, goals are aligned, and every appointed executive in your organization is positioned for success. Moderator: Jacob Green, President and CEO, Jacob Green & Associates Speakers: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney, Cities of Pomona and Santa Ana Greg Devereaux, Managing Partner, Worthington 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Bridging Prosperity: Leveraging the Synergy Between Housing, Commerce, and Concurrent Session Public Spaces to Create Thriving Communities Ballroom A2 By strategically investing in affordable housing and integrating it with other essential community elements, jurisdictions can spark significant economic and community reinvestment, leading to sustainable and inclusive growth for all residents. Using an integrated development approach, explore the nexus of affordable housing, economic development, equity and community revitalization through strategic investments to drive economic growth and community betterment. Moderator: Tara Matthews, Vice President / Principal, RSG, Inc. Speakers: Dena Fuentes, Director, RSG, Inc. Rebecca Louie, President and CEO, Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation Rochelle Mills, President and CEO, Innovative Housing Opportunities League of California Cities Executive Committee President, Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem, Rancho Cucamonga First Vice President, Gabe Quinto, Mayor Pro Tem, El Cerrito Second Vice President, Teresa Acosta, Council Member, Carlsbad Immediate Past President, Daniel Parra, Council Member, Fowler Executive Director and CEO, Carolyn Coleman, League of California Cities League of California Cities 4 2025 City Leaders Summit THURSDAY, APRIL 24 10:00-11:15a.m. Partners in Local Governance: Strength, Continuity, and Leadership in Modern Local Concurrent Session Government Ballroom Al Successful local governance relies on a strong partnership between elected officials and professional staff. This session brings together seasoned leaders from both sides of the dais to share their experiences, challenges, and lessons learned in fostering effective collaboration. Through real -world stories and candid discussions, this session will explore the dynamics of governance, communication, and decision -making, offering strategies to strengthen relationships, build effective council -city manager partnerships and improve outcomes for communities. Moderator: The Honorable Joe Simitian, Former State Senator, State Assemblymember, County Supervisor, Mayor and Council Member, School Board President and Trustee Speakers: Mary Bier, Council Member, Pacifica Dr. Peter Pirnejad, ICMA-CM, City Manager, Los Altos Hills, Cal-ICMA President 2025/26 Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager, Pacifica 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Speed Sessions Concurrent Session Ballroom A2 Moderator: Jorge/ Chavez, Second Vice President, Mayors and Council Members Department and Mayor, Bell Gardens When Public Comment Crosses the Line (10.00 - 70.20 a.m.) Cities of all sizes have recently experienced a surge in public comment that is excessively vulgar and fiery, and at times even beyond what may be protected by the Brown Act and First Amendment. Elected officials surely anticipate criticism and sharp commentary, but what about when the remarks serve to make meeting attendees and those on the dais fear for their personal safety? Cities often find their hands tied when mitigating public comment that would be prohibited in most other public forums, such as state and federal legislatures and courts. Generally, applicable rules of decorum are often not enough to regulate or discourage the conduct in more extreme instances. When public comment moves from critical to frightening, what can cities do? This panel presentation will discuss the possibility of a workplace violence restraining order against meeting attendees whose conduct injects fear into public meetings. Speaker. John Funk, City Attorney, Downey Unofficial Guide to Surviving and Thriving in Elected Office (70.25 - 70.45a.m.) Discover the tips, tricks, and truths no one tells you before you're sworn in. This session will share hard-earned wisdom, from building coalitions to managing crises, to growing thick layers of skin in order to do the right thing. Learn to lead effectively while keeping your ego in check, your sanity intact, and your relationships intentional. Speaker: Scott Alvord, CEO, Advanced Development Concepts, LLC Today's Roadmap to Economic Development: Climate Action, Zoning, and Housing (70.50 - 77:70 a.m.) Economic development has transitioned from redevelopment to sustainability; from retail to residential; from shopping trips to retail apps, all with a focus on green infrastructure, resiliency, and density. In a post-COVID digital world consumers want a 15-minute community with restaurants, jobs, and great schools. The private sector is investing in green energy projects, with federal and state funding available to support these efforts. Meanwhile, the state is encouraging cities to increase density, as housing represents the highest land value. This session will show city leaders how to implement effective economic development by taking advantage of zoning and financing tools to attract and induce private investment the community wants. Speaker. Larry Kosmont, Chair & CEO, Kosmont Companies League of California Cities 5 2025 City Leaders Summit THURSDAY, APRIL 24 11:15a.m.-12:15p.m. Networking Lunch Ballroom A Pre -Function 12:15 - 1:45 p.m. General Session Ballroom Al Opening Remarks: Debbie Baker, President, Mayors and Council Members Department and Council Member, La Palma Building Communities of Trust: How Cities Can Bridge the Trust Divide Nothing is more essential to human happiness —or the success of our societies —than trust in one another. Yet, trust has been eroding. Too many people feel disconnected from their neighbors, suspicious of strangers, and excluded from the social fabric of their communities. The good news? Our cities have the power to help bridge the trust divide. In this visual journey, Tristan Cleveland shares fascinating and often funny social experiments to demonstrate that we can redesign our communities to draw people together in ways that nurture the bonds that keep us all healthy, happy, and strong. By understanding the effect that design has on our emotions and decisions, we can all help shape this empowering new vision of city life. Keynote Speaker: Tristan Cleveland, Urban Planner & Research Specialist, Happy Cities 2:00-3:15 p.m. What Happens When Reporters Leave Your Town - And What To Do About It Concurrent Session Ballroom Al WESTERNS -. l• California has lost one-third of its newspapers since 2005, turning many cities into news "mirages." This panel will explore the impact of the shifting media environment on public safety and city governments, including the decline in reliable media coverage and reduced reporting on city council meetings. Drawing from the experience of city officials and reporters, along with the support of the California Association of Public Information Officers and an in-depth feature article in Western City magazine, this panel will explore how some cities are finding new ways to communicate essential information to residents and other efforts to build more local reporting capacity. Moderator. Brian Hendershot, Managing Editor, Western City Magazine, League of California Cities Speakers: Soheila Bana, Council Member, Richmond Patricia Lock Dawson, Mayor, Riverside Christa Scharfenberg, Project Director, UC Berkeley Journalism - CA Local News Fellowship Amy Williams, Assistant to the City Manager/Chief of Staff, Sacramento 2:00 - 3:15 p.m. Addressing Climate and Environmental Inequities in Black Communities Concurrent Session Ballroom A2 Planned with the Cal Cities African American Caucus Black communities face disproportionate climate risks, from health disparities like asthma to economic instability due to environmental hazards. Despite state mandates such as SB 272 requiring climate adaptation planning, funding gaps and equity considerations remain unaddressed, leaving these neighborhoods vulnerable. This panel will explore how local governments can drive meaningful change by prioritizing climate resilience funding, green job creation, housing equity, and community -led solutions. Join us for a critical discussion on advancing environmental justice and ensuring Black communities have a voice in climate policy and adaptation efforts. Moderator. Princess Washington, Council Member, Suisun City Speakers: Troy Finley, President, National Action Network Bay Area Kerby Lynch, Director of Research, Ceres Policy Research Zoe Siegel, Senior Director of Climate Resilience, Greenbelt Alliance 3:15-3:45 p.m. Dessert Break Ballroom A Pre -Function League of California Cities 6 2025 City Leaders Summit THURSDAY, APRIL 24 3:45 - 5:00 p.m. Gangs Out of Downey: A Crime Prevention Model Concurrent Session Ballroom Al Opening Remarks: Blanca Pacheco, Assemblymember, 64th District, California State Legislature This session will highlight the impactful gang prevention efforts led by Gangs Out of Downey (GOOD), in collaboration with community partners, including the City of Downey. It will showcase how these partnerships create efficient, community -driven strategies to support the safety and well-being of Downey's youth and their families. GOOD and its partners leverage their expertise and resources to provide intervention, prevention, and diversion services, aligning with National Gang Center best practices that emphasize engaging community groups, after -school activities, and family support programs. Key initiatives like Kids & Cops Day and the School Resource Officer (SRO) program will be explored, demonstrating how these programs foster trust and positive relationships between youth and law enforcement. The City of Downey's financial support, including Community Development Block Grant funds and contributions to GOOD's programs and events, highlights a shared commitment to providing pathways for opportunity and well-being for young residents. Through these collaborative efforts, GOOD has been instrumental in maintaining Downey as a gang -free city, raising awareness about gang -related dangers, and empowering local youth to pursue positive futures. Moderator: Roger Bradley, City Manager, Downey Speakers: Darrell Jackson, Founder, 10-20 Club Inc. Scott Loughner, Chief of Police, Downey Hector Soso, Mayor, Downey 3:45 - 5:00 p.m. California's Economic Outlook: Navigating the Future with Data -Driven Insights Concurrent Session Ballroom A2 Join UCLA Anderson Forecast and Avenu Insights & Analytics for an in-depth analysis of California's economic landscape and emerging trends that impact cities and their leaders. For over six decades, UCLA Anderson Forecast has delivered highly respected economic forecasts, while Avenu has guided California's local governments with insights on regional and local trends for over 40 years. This session provides a comprehensive view of both the state and local economic forecasts, equipping leaders with actionable insights to support resilient, prosperous communities. Moderator: Reva Feldman, Retired City Manager, Malibu Speakers: Thomas Adams, Director of Sales and Use Tax Audit, Avenu Insights & Analytics Jerry Nickelsburg, Professor, UCLA 2024 - 2025 Mayors and Council Members Department Officers President, Debbie Baker, Council Member, La Palma First Vice President, Kuldip Thusu, Council Member, Dinuba Second Vice President, Jorgel Chavez, Mayor, Bell Gardens Department Director, Jan Arbuckle, Council Member, Grass Valley Immediate Past President, Susannah Meyer, Mayor, Brentwood League of California Cities 7 2025 City Leaders Summit FRIDAY, APRIL 25 8:00 - 11:00 a.m. I Registration Open Ballroom A Pre -Function 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. Networking Breakfast Ballroom Al 9:00 - 10:15 a.m. Navigating PFAS Litigation: Securing Municipal Remediation Funds Concurrent Session Ballroom Al This session will provide an in-depth look at the legal strategies and current overview of PFAS litigation, focusing on how municipal lawyers can protect clients and secure funds for PFAS remediation. As environmental concerns and regulations intensify, city leaders must understand statute of limitations issues, emerging regulations, and the current status of nationwide PFAS litigation, including the importance of timely action. Discover critical insights into the current settlements, future settlements, multi -district litigation (MDL) status, significant deadlines, and the role of municipal attorneys in protecting public health by securing financial resources for their communities. Moderator. Jan Arbuckle, Department Director, Mayors and Council Members Department and Council Member, Grass Valley Speaker: Michael Stag, Managing Partner, Stag Liuzza 9:00 - 10:15 a.m. Earning Public Trust: Practical Strategies for Transparent and Effective Leadership Concurrent Session Ballroom A2 Trust is the cornerstone of good governance and effective collaboration with our communities, and elected leaders play a pivotal role in fostering trust with our cities. Clear, transparent messaging, publicly addressing resident concerns and openly acknowledging mistakes are keen aspects of trust building exercises. In this session, the panel will explore proven strategies for building trust with residents. From transparency in decision -making to council processes and decorum standards, attendees will learn practical approaches that forge collaboration and not division in the city -resident relationship. This session will highlight experiences of elected leaders and public servants who have successfully navigated challenges that either threatened or rebuilt trust in their cities. Moderator. Ryder Smith, President, Tripepi Smith Speakers: Michael La Vorne Antwine II, City Manager, Bell Dante Hall, City Manager, Hercules Brenda Olmos, Council Member, Paramount 10:30 a.m. -12:00 p.m. Closing General Session Ballroom Al Closing Remarks: Debbie Baker, President, Mayors and Council Members Department and Council Member, La Palma What Makes Each Generation Want to Vote Age matters ... but maybe not in the way you are thinking. What motivates Gen-X to go to the ballot box or keeps them on the sidelines is different than what moves Gen-Z one way or the other. This session will look at what makes each generation unique, what motivates them to vote, and how to create personalized messages to better connect with each age group. In addition to exploring the differences between Boomers and Millennials or Generation-X and Generation-Z, we'll look at some of the things all age groups have in common. This high-energy, interactive, and inspiring session will make you think, laugh, and learn. Keynote Speaker. Lee Silber, Lead Trainer, Creative -Lee Speaking League of California Cities 8 2025 City Leaders Summit NOTES League of California Cities g 2025 City Leaders Summit LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 www.calcities.org LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — CITY LEADERS SUMMIT SACRAMENTO, CA (HYATT) APRIL 23-25, 2025 MAYOR BRENDEN KALFUS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23, 2025 Hotel: Hyatt, 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Phone: 916-443-1234, Confirmation #85955067, $458.00 + fees and taxes. 9:OOam-5:30PM Registration Open 10:00am-11:15pm Opening General Session 11:30-12:15pm Member Rally and Press Conference 12:15-2:OOpm Lunch on Your Own 2:00 — 5:OOpm Legislative Sessions 5:00-7:OOpm Legislative Reception sponsored by Cal Cities Partners THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 2025 7:30-8:30am 8:30-5:OOpm 11:15-12:15am Networking Breakfast Concurrent Sessions Networking Lunch 2:OOam-5:OOpm Concurrent Sessions LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — CITY LEADERS SUMMIT SACRAMENTO, CA (HYATT) APRIL 23-25, 2025 MPT JESSICA ALEXANDER WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23, 2025 Hotel: Hyatt, 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Phone: 916-443-1234, Confirmation #14600540, $458.00 + fees and taxes. 9:00am-5:30PM Registration Open 10:00am-11:15pm Opening General Session 11:30-12:15pm Member Rally and Press Conference 12:15-2:00pm Lunch on Your Own 2:00 — 5:00pm Legislative Sessions 5:00-7:00pm Legislative Reception sponsored by Cal Cities Partners THURSDAY. APRIL 24. 2025 7:30-8:30am Networking Breakfast 8:30-5:00pm Concurrent Sessions 11:15-12:15am Networking Lunch 12:15am-1:45pm General Session FRIDAY, APRIL 25, 2025 8:00-9:00am Networking Breakfast 9:00-10:15am Concurrent Sessions 10:30am-noon Closing General Session Noon Adjourn LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — CITY LEADERS SUMMIT SACRAMENTO, CA (HYATT) APRIL 23-25, 2025 CM JAMES STEWART WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23, 2025 Hotel: Hyatt, 1209 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Phone: 916-443-1234, Confirmation #8482282, $458.00 + fees and taxes. 9:00am-5:30PM Registration Open 10:00am-11:15pm Opening General Session 11:30-12:15pm Member Rally and Press Conference 12:15-2:00pm Lunch on Your Own 2:00 — 5:00pm Legislative Sessions 5:00-7:00pm Legislative Reception sponsored by Cal Cities Partners THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 2025 7:30-8:30am 8:30-5:00pm 11:15-12:15am Networking Breakfast Concurrent Sessions Networking Lunch 12:15am-1:45pm General Session Item No. 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of April 2025. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES In April 2025, Planning has processed forty-three (43) new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted five (5) Public Hearings. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Fhwing 3Ww6c Long Range 13 Ganditional Use Permit Development Plant 1 E'llensian of Time Maps 1 Massage Permits -Modifications 9 Pre-Aplication Residential Tract Product ReView 1 Sign Program Temporary Use Permit 7 -Vendor License Zoning Letter 4 Total am I Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update and Planned Development Overlay Amendment (PA21-1525, PA22-0105, PA250181): The City is processing a Modification (PA21-1525) to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit (PA07-0200 and PA07-0202) that at buildout will include the existing 206,341 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with a proposed approximately 20,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot, four story medical office building, and a 14,000 square foot utility plant in Phase 2, an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square, three story medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated from its interim location to the roof of the parking structure in Phase 3; a Planned Development Overlay Amendment (PA22-0105) to the Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-9) including establishing an administrative approval process and design guidelines for buildings and structures, revising development standards, and clarifying the allowable mix of structures and uses in the PDO, including specifically not allowing a behavioral health hospital; and a Modification (PA25-0181) to remove Condition of Approval No. 27 from a previously approved Planning Application (PA18-1529) which provided a deadline on the commencement of foundation construction for future hospital bed tower 2.. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. A public scoping meeting for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was held on March 23, 2022, at the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library. The public review period for the SEIR has ended. The Final SEIR has been completed by the consultant and meetings have taken place with the City Council and Planning Commission Subcommittee's. A Community Meeting organized by TVH took place on November 13, 2023, in the City of Temecula Conference Center. A Second Community Meeting organized by TVH took place on March 26, 2025, in the City of Temecula Conference Center. The project has been scheduled for Planning Commission on June 4, 2025. (COOPER) Parker Medical Center II (PA22-0987): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 35,601 square -foot, three story, medical office building located on the west side of Avenida De Missiones, approximately 425 feet south of Temecula Parkway. (COOPER) Rancho-12 Tentative Tract Map (PA22-0047): The City is processing a 12-lot single-family development located at 31670 Rancho California Road. (JONES) Be Good Hotel (PA22-0995): The City is processing a Development Plan Application to review a four-story hotel featuring nine rooms, restaurant, and subterranean parking. The project is generally located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Mercedes Street. (CARDENAS) Bedford Court Development Plan (PA23-0197): The City is processing a Development Plan application to allow for the construction of two structures totaling approximately 4,546 square feet. Anticipated uses consist of a car wash and coffee shop. The project is generally located approximately 160 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on April 16, 2025 and is scheduled to be presented at the May 13, 2025 City Council Hearing. (JONES) Bedford Court Planned Development Overlay (PA23-0280): The City is processing a Planned Development Overlay to provide development standards for a proposed coffee shop and car wash. The project is located approximately 160 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection at APN 922-210-042. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on April 16, 2025, and is scheduled to be presented at the May 13, 2025, City Council Hearing. (JONES) Redhawk Specific Plan Amendment (PA23-0327): The City is processing an amendment to the Redhawk Specific Plan to provide a revision to uses associated with the golf course and add related standards for those uses. The project is located at 45100 Temecula Parkway within the Redhawk Specific Plan (related planning application number PA23-0251 CUP). (JONES) Front and Main (PA23-0492): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 13,600 square foot structure totaling three -stories. The project is generally located approximately 130 feet east of the Old Town Front Street and Main Street intersection at APN 922-034-037. (CARDENAS) Habitat II (PA24-0230 & 0231): A Development Plan and related map for an approximately 10,550 square foot residential project comprised of six units within two 2 story structures. The project is located at 28725 and 28731 Pujol Street. (CARDENAS) Amissa Townhomes (PA22-0941): The City is processing a Development Plan application for the construction of 14 multi -family residential units on the vacant .68-acre parcel located at 42146 Sixth Street. (CARDENAS) Mercedes Benz Sprinter (PA23-0329): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 81,295 square foot Mercedes Benz Sprinter Dealership that includes maintenance and repair services, detail center, and employee wellness center. The project is located on an undeveloped site at 40910 Temecula Center Drive. (COOPER) Cubesmart AT&T Wireless Antenna Facility (PA22-0470): The City is processing a Wireless Antenna Facility application for a proposed 40' tall mono -eucalyptus tree located behind the existing CubeSmart Self Storage facility located at 44618 Pechanga Parkway. (CARDENAS) Tony's Car Wash (PA23-0321): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a proposed 6,828 square -foot car wash facility consisting of a car wash tunnel, detailing tunnel, an office, and vacuums on the vacant 1.99-acre property located approximately 200 feet southwest of Temecula Parkway and Jedediah Smith Road. (CARDENAS) Vertical Bridge WAF (PA23-0351): The City of processing a Wireless Antenna Facility Application (Conditional Use Permit) for a new 77-foot wireless tower facility and associated ground equipment at the Redhawk Golf Course open space area between Camino Rubi and Corte Mislanca. (CARDENAS) Small Steps Industrial (PA24-0180): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a proposed 8,000 square foot industrial building on the vacant .59-acre parcel located on the northwest corner of Felix Valdez Avenue and Baldaray Circle. (CARDENAS) MS Mountain View Buildings 17 and 21 (PA24-0246): The City is processing a Development Plan application for Building 17, a 69,095 square foot building; and Building 21, a 17,136 square foot building located on the west of the corner of Via Industria and Avenida Alvarado. (CARDENAS) Sommers Bend PA12 HPR (PA24-0509): The City is processing a Home Product Review for Planning Area 12 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for five (5) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 104 lots. (CARDENAS) Altair Private Recreation Center & C1 Park (PA24-0363): The City is processing a Development Plan for the Altair Private Recreation Center and Village C 1 Park containing an approximately 1,992 square foot recreation building, 1,437 square foot multi -purpose building, and 1,018 square foot pool building. The recreation center also contains a pool, spa, cabanas, fire pit area, and BBQ area. The park contains two (2) pickleball courts, half -basketball court, picnic areas, and an open turf area. The project is located within the Altair Specific Plan area. The project has been scheduled for Planning Commission on May 21, 2025. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA25-0016): The City is processing a Third Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The project has been scheduled for Planning Commission on May 21, 2025 (COOPER) Sommers Bend PA10 HPR (PA24-0508): The City is processing a Home Product Review for Planning Area 10 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for two (2) unique detached single-family plans with two (2) architectural styles consisting of 13 lots. (COOPER) Sommers Bend PA33A HPR (PA24-0510): The City is processing a Home Product Review for Planning Area 33A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for two (2) unique detached single-family plans with two (2) architectural styles consisting of 15 lots. (COOPER) Elderberry Park Recreation Center and HPR (PA25-0163 &-0168): The City is processing architectural plans for a private recreation center with ancillary amenities and six (6) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 164 lots for a new residential tract development at Specific Plan Paloma Del Sol. (MARQUEZ & COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING General Plan Update: The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi- year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The RFP for the General Plan managing consultant was awarded to Sagecrest Environmental (Contract approved January 28, 2025). The RFP for the General Plan consultant was released and interviews held with the top applicants the week of April 28th. The selection committee chose De Novo Planning Group to lead the General Plan effort. The contract is scheduled for consideration by the City Council on May 27, 2025. (PETERS) Local Hazard Mitigation Plan AB 2140 Compliance (LR25-0056): A proposed City Council Resolution to include reference to the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in compliance with A132140. The proposed resolution would reduce the City's costs in circumstances where FEMA declares an emergency. Staff is working with the City Attorneys office to ensure documents comply with both state and federal requirements. (COLLINS) ADU Ordinance (LR25-0058): A proposed Ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) to comply with changes to state law. The proposed Ordinance has been presented to the PC Municipal Code Maintenance Subcommittee on March 19, 2025 (BH/MW) and the CC General Plan Update Subcommittee on March 27, 2025. The Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance at its regular meeting on April 16, 2025. This item is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on May 13th. (COLLINS) City of Temecula Fire Hazard Severity Zone Ordinance (LR25-0097): A proposed Ordinance to designate fire hazard severity zones within the City in compliance with §51178. This item was presented to the City Council Public Safety Subcommittee (JA/MR) n April 8th and is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on May 27, 2025. (COLLINS) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment (LR19-1458): An amendment to the Uptown Specific Plan to implement the following changes: modify graphics to reflect consistency with text regarding allowable frontage types, amend street cross sections (graphics), amend plant pallet and Silva cell requirements for street trees, implement a street naming convention, amend streetlight spacing and other typographical errors. Staff has reached out to Spurlock Consulting for assistance in updating the Sidewalk and Streetscape Standards and is awaiting a scope of work and timeline. Public Works is drafting new street sections for the Specific Plan. Spurlock Consulting has provided a scope of work for the proposed changes to the streetscape and sidewalk standards and staff has executed the agreement for services and will begin updating the graphics as requested. Planning and Traffic Engineering have been working on updated street cross sections and a map to identify cross section placements. (JONES) Old Town Parklets (LR22-1112): The previous Old Town Outdoor Dining Program was a project intended to make the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program (TED) permanent that was sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. However, due to the potential barriers that came to light such as loss of parking, ADA requirements, outside agency fees and more, the decision was made by City Council and staff to end the outdoor dining program when the license agreements expired on July 1, 2022. With that, other outdoor dining amenities were explored for Old Town which led to the Old Town Parklet Project. Parklets are the conversion of parking spaces on urban streets into a small public `park' or enclosed seating area. The intent of the Parklet Project is to provide an additional amenity to the community and promote an increase in pedestrian activity and convenience. Staff is working with a consultant, Placeworks, to design and implement the Old Town Parklets. Locations and design themes will be determined throughout the process with direction from the Old Town Steering Subcommittee. An open -house style community workshop was held on October 11, 2023, to retrieve feedback from community members. The input received from the 12 attendees was presented to the Old Town Steering Subcommittee on November 14, 2023, and direction was given to staff to move forward with a pilot program. A recommendation document with example designs and amenities was presented to the Old Town Local Advisory Committee (OTLAC) on January 23, 2025, for feedback. Staff is working with the consultant on finalizing two pilot parklets to implement. (GARCIA) Wayfinding Guide (LR23-0167/LR24-0344): The City is working with a consultant, Alta Planning + Design, Inc., to implement a bicycle wayfinding system for the bike lanes and trails throughout the city. Alta will draft a wayfinding strategy memo that outlines best practices for destination selection, sign placement, and sign programming. The Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan that was adopted in 2016 will act as an implementation and style guide to create an interconnected network designed to encourage more residents to use active transportation. Staff contracted with Alta Planning to design and produce the signs, however decided to use Brand Assassins for production for cost purposes. A kickoff meeting was held in February 2025, and the consultant is working on a draft/mockup to be presented to the City Council Trails/Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee in May. (GARCIA) Objective Design Standards Amendment (LR23-0490): The Objective Design Standards were adopted on January 25, 2022, and only included multi -family and mixed -use development standards. Staff has observed the need for additional Objective Design Standards for single family development. Placeworks, Inc., who helped the City adopt the original Objective Design Standards document, will be assisting us in amending the document to include single-family development. The final version of the proposed document was brought to the Planning Commission General Plan Update Subcommittee on October 2, 2024, and City Council General Plan Update Subcommittee on December 10, 2024. Due to multiple pieces of legislation passed this past year, there was a delay while consulting with the City Attorney's office. The document is currently being updated by the consultant to reflect recent changes to state law and is slated to go to Planning Commission in May. (JONES) SB 1186 (LR24-0090): Staff has prepared a draft ordinance and is being reviewed by the City Attorney's Office for compliance with state law. (COLLINS) Old Town Parking Sensors (LR22-0857): The project is a continuation of the Old Town Parking White Paper that discussed various technology solutions designed to track and report on parking in Old Town in real time. The white paper recommended that the City utilize parking sensors to monitor parking in Old Town. Staff has circulated a Request for Proposal from companies offering parking sensors. Responses were received and reviewed by staff. The companies that submitted the top two highest rated proposals were invited to provide a demonstration to staff. Demonstrations were held in April and a vendor was selected (Frogparking, Inc.). The agreement for the Frogparking Sensors was taken to City Council on November 12th. Sensor installation is scheduled for February 11, 2025, at 7:00 a.m. This installation will be for the pilot program for the parallel parking spaces along Old Town Front Street between Main Street and the northern entry arch. The street will remain open during the installation process. (JONES) Annual Title 17 Cleanup (LR25-0004): An annual effort of Community Development to identify areas of the code that need clarification, correction, or an update. This is also performed to implement various components of state law. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance and presented it to the Planning Commission Municipal Code Maintenance Subcommittee on April 2, 2025, and to the City Council General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee on April 22, 2025. The draft ordinance will be going to a Planning Commission Hearing on May 21, 2025. (GARCIA) Annual CIP/General Plan Consistency Review (LR25-0112): Sections 65402 and 65403 of the State Planning and Zoning Law that require that the Planning Commission review and provide comments to the City Council regarding the conformity of the CIP with the General Plan. This is an annual review and will include draft fiscal years 2026-2030. This is slated to go to Planning Commission on May 21, 2025. (GARCIA) Massage Ordinance Update (LR25-0100): An update to the massage ordinance to address potential policy changes regarding duration of denial of a revoked massage business license, penalty timeframes for shutdown establishments, city abatement cost recovery, and establishment inspections. Staff is currently working with the City Attorney's Office on addressing legal concerns and possible code amendments. (GARCIA) HOUSING Uptown Temecula Request for Proposal (RFP): The City has been working closely with the Supportive Housing and Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee to create a draft RFP for the City owned vacant land parcel located in Uptown Temecula. City Staff presented the draft RFP to Council on March 25t' and approved for it to be released once HCD approved our Surplus Land Exemption. The parcel is right next to the French Valley off ramp headed south on the I-15 Freeway and it is planned to be used for an affordable housing project. (URIAS) AMISSA VILLAGE: The City is reviewing a Development Plan application for the construction of 14 multi -family residential units on the vacant .68-acre parcel located at 42146 Sixth Street. (CARDENAS) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for April 2025 are highlighted in the following table. Building & Safety Statistics April Permits 296 Nunn Single Family Units MMMMA 27 Accessory- Dra elling Units (ADU) 3 New Commercial Building � 8 Photovoltaic - Solar_APP+(inatmtpumh) 38 Photovoltaic (Standard Vodit4,,.. 23 Tenant Improvement 5 Non Constrwtion C of 0 E0 26 Dumber of Active Pfau Checks 147 Number of-1e%v Plan Checks 52 Dumber of Finaled Permits 248 Inspections 3240 Inspections Per Day 162 Inspections Per Person Per A=ill Stops Per Month 910 visitors to Counter Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Rockin Jay's Italian Subs - (2, 000 sq ft) ❑ Love Era - (2,600 sfi ❑ Happy Endings Tattoo - (1,350 sq ft) Tenant Improvement ❑ Ultima Metals - (4,500 sq ft) ❑ Vita Plus - (21,793 sq ft) ❑ Symbio - (1,150 sq ft) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the months of April, Code Enforcement responded to 90 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 102 code cases, conducted 312 regular inspections, and forwarded 10 referrals. Code Enforcement Stali5dcs Apr Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 0 Vacant Home 1 Prop- Maintenance llnfestat onl Mold 14 Busiuess or Home Occupation w b license CUP 13 Trash and Debris l Dumping b O�-ergroiv-n egeta#ion �1 eels , Fire Hazard 4 Green Pool l Nrector Control / stagnant Water 4 Graffiti I 15 iuisance'An mal Control RV Stored Boat. Parking 3 action w o PemutBuilding Code ch Public ROW: Trash Cans S cSafe-h- S- Health Number of Cases 7 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Statistics APm Residential - Default 44 Residential - Foreclosure 20 Residential - REO lg Total - residential 79 Commercial - Defkk 2 Commercial - Foreclosure 1 Commercial - REO 6 Total - Commercial g ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0129 28522 Old Town Front St 922-024-009 Marcella Mills 04/01/2025 04/23/2025 Sherrie Munroe Palomar Rental PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Pamec Patio MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for the addition of tables, seating, and patio covers to the outdoor area adjacent to the Palomar Inn Hotel to accommodate the Pamec wine tasting bar. Project located at 28522 Old Town Front Street, Suite 3 (outdoor area). PA25-0130 28522 Old Town Front St 922-024-009 Marcella Mills 04/01/2025 04/24/2025 Sherrie Munroe Palomar Rental PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Pamec Old Town Outdoor Live Entertainment TUP: a Temporary Use Permit for Pamec wine -tasting bar located in the outdoor space next to 28522 Old Town Front Street to offer live entertainment under the Old Town Outdoor Live Entertainment Pilot Program. The hours of operation for the outdoor live entertainment are Thursday through Saturday 12:OOPM to 8:OOPM and Sunday to Monday 11:00 AM to 7:00 PM, until the expiration of the pilot program on August 8, 2025. PA25-0131 28522 Old Town Front St 922-024-009 Marcella Mills 04/02/2025 04/09/2025 Sherrie Munroe Palomar Rental PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Pamec Two -Day Operations TUP: a Temporary Use Permit for Pamec Winery to operate a wine -tasting bar under a Type 2 ABC license in the outdoor space adjacent to the Palomar Inn Hotel on April 12 and 13, 2025 from 12:00 PM to 8:00 PM. The event is located at 28522 Old Town Front Street, Suite 3 and there is no live entertainment proposed. PA25-0132 922-140-010 Yannin Marquez 04/02/2025 04/17/2025 Shirley Ruiz CITY OF PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA TEMECULA Use Permit Case Title / Description: Reliance Church Easter Sunday TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for the temporary parking of vehicles on the city vacant lot located at the corner of Ynez Road and Santiago Road for Easter services at Reliance Church from 7:00 AM to 1:30 PM on April 20, 2025. PA25-0133 31709 Temecula Pky 961-080-004 Yannin Marquez 04/02/2025 Gustavo Ortega Kimberly PL Sign Program Out Temecula, CA 92592 Haechten Case Title / Description: CAVA SP: A Sign Program Amendment application to amend the Vail Ranch Center Sign Program No. 22 for building 31709 Temecula Parkway (Pad 7) of the Vail Ranch Center shopping center. PA25-0137 27648 Ynez Rd 921-320-012 Jaime Cardenas 04/04/2025 Jennifer Lovelace HENKIN GROUP PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 II Case Title / Description: Temecula Town Center Gray Paint MOD: a Modification Application for the review and consideration by the Planning Commission of the as -built gray color scheme of the Temecula Town Center's buildings. Page 1 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0138 28377 Felix Valdez Ave 921-281-004 Yannin Marquez 04/07/2025 Jennifer Wyman Dan Samarin PL Modifications Out Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: United Rentals ADA MOD: A Modification Application for Accessible Disability Act (ADA) improvements that include correcting slopes, restriping, new accessible van stall signage, landing, new accessible pedestrian gate and guardrails at the front of the building located at 28377 Felix Valdez Avenue. PA25-0139 45010 Corte Alegra 961-124-017 Marcella Mills 04/07/2025 Steven Hill Brenda Eskridge PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Eskridge Residence MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for the 343 SF kitchen and living room addition to an existing single-family home located at 45010 Corte Alegra PA25-0140 29885 Camino Del Sol 944-100-043 Jaime Cardenas 04/08/2025 Mengu Sukan PL Maps Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Tract 38833 TPM: a Tentative Parcel Map Application for assessor's parcel number 944-100-043, located on tract 38833, to be subdivided into two (2) legal lots. PA25-0141 41740 Enterprise Cir North 909-282-007 Marcella Mills 04/08/2025 04/09/2025 Cheryl King CBRE Nelson Prop One PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 41740 Enterprise Circle North ZL: a Zoning Letter request for 41740 Enterprise Circle North (APN: 909-282-007). PA25-0142 940-310-013 Scott Cooper 04/09/2025 Colin Koch Brookfield SoCal PL Modifications Out Temecula, CA Land Constructors MOD? LLC Case Title / Description: Altair Phase I Backbone Private Landscape Plans PA25-0143 26201 Ynez Rd 910-281-009 Marcella Mills 04/09/2025 04/10/2025 Julie Morrow Lightbox/PZR BRE 26201 PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92591 YNEZ OWNER Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 26201 Ynez Road ZL: a Zoning Letter Request for 26201 Ynez Road (APN: 910-281-009). PA25-0144 42259 Rio Nedo 909-253-017 Marcella Mills 04/09/2025 04/10/2025 Julie Morrow Lightbox/PZR PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 42259 Rio Nedo ZL: a Zoning Letter Request for 42259 Rio Nedo (APN: 909-253-017). Page 2 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0146 41877 Enterprise Cir North 909-281-020 Marcella Mills 04/11/2025 04/14/2025 NaKia Nickerson Parting Destiny WINCHESTER PL Zoning or Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Funeral Home FINANCIAL Planning Letter CENTER Case Title / Description: 41877 Enterprise Circle North ZL: a Zoning Letter Request for 41877 Enterprise Circle North (APN: 909-281-020). PA25-0150 41278 Margarita Rd , B4 921-831-014 Marcella Mills 04/15/2025 John McDonald Eukon Group Adrian PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 (Agent for Mussgnug AT&T) Case Title / Description: 41278 Margarita Cell Tower MOD: a Major Modification to modify an existing building and Conditional Use Permit for a wireless telecommunication facility to accommodate new wireless equipment and increase the height of the existing building located at 41278 Margarita Road. PA25-0154 28676 Old Town Front St 922-044-009 Marcella Mills 04/16/2025 04/28/2025 Bridget Norris FRONT STREET PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 HOLDINGS Use Permit Case Title / Description: Swing Inn TUP: a Temporary Use Permit for selling food and alcohol outside of Swing Inn located at 28676 Old Town Front Street during the Rod Run event on May 2, 2025 and May 3, 2025, from 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM. PA25-0155 41950 4Th St 922-034-020 Marcella Mills 04/17/2025 Kirk Medeiros TV Old Town LP PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Use Permit Case Title / Description: 4th St. Hotel TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for a construction yard for building material storage for a period of six months located approximately 50 feet southwest of Mercedes Street on the south side of 4th Street PA25-0156 28636 Old Town Front St 922-034-036 Marcella Mills 04/17/2025 Cortney Perez Front & Main PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: 1909 Dog Adoption Event TUP: a Temporary Use Permit for 1909 Restaurant to host Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary for a dog adoption event on May 20, 2025 from 12:OOPM to 4:OOPM located at 28636 Old Town Front Street. There is no food, alcohol, or live entertainment for this event. PA25-0157 41948 4Th St 922-034-022 Marcella Mills 04/17/2025 Kirk Medeiros TV Old Town LP PL Extension of Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Time Case Title / Description: 4th St. Hotel 4th EOT (DP): The fifth Extension of Time application for a previously approved Development Plan (PA17-0854) for a four-story hotel with underground parking located approximately 50 feet southwest of Mercedes Street on the south side of 4th Street. PA25-0158 28751 Rancho California Rd 921-280-003 Marcella Mills 04/18/2025 Riley Drew Riley Drew PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Thee Riley Drew Studios MEP (Exempt): a Massage Establishment Permit Application for a massage establishment located at 28751 Rancho California Road, Suite 201. Page 3 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0159 32499 Rosa Ct 955-442-074 Marcella Mills 04/21/2025 Jennifer Cole Paseo Del Sol PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Master Assn Case Title / Description: Paseo del Sol HOA Canopy MOD: a Modification Application for the Paseo del Sol Master Association to construct a canopy structure over a park located at 32505 Campo Road (APN: 955-442-074) PA25-0160 31915 Calle Elenita 957-571-004 Marcella Mills 04/22/2025 Fernando Solis Ana Evora PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Evora Residence MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) to replace a garage door with two windows at 31915 Calle Elenita PA25-0161 32101 Sommers Bend 964-640-031 Marcella Mills 04/22/2025 Kimberly Hull CITY OF PL Vendor Plan Review Temecula, CA TEMECULA License Case Title / Description: The Local Candy Cart VL: an Outdoor Vendor License for The Local Candy Cart to operate a roaming vendor cart Monday through Sunday 7:OOAM to 9:OOPM in public parks. PA25-0162 40335 Winchester Rd , F 920-080-004 Yannin Marquez 04/22/2025 VERONICA TEMECULA PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 LANDEROS MARKETPLACE Use Permit Case Title / Description: El Ranchito Taco Shop CUP: A Conditional Use Permit application to upgrade their liquor license from a Type 41 ABC License (On -Sale Beer and Wine) to a Type 47 ABC License (On Sale General — Eating Place) at an existing restaurant located at 40335 Winchester Road, Suite F. PA25-0163 959-400-001 Yannin Marquez 04/23/2025 Dena Upp escrow acct WOODSIDE 05S PL Development Plan Review Temecula, CA 5074 authorized Plan user Case Title / Description: Elderberry Park Recreation Center DP: A Development Plan Application for an approximately 3,000 square foot private recreation center and ancillary amenities for the new residential tract development at Specific Plan Paloma Del Sol (PA14-0087). PA25-0164 30697 Temecula Pky 961-410-009 Katie Garcia 04/23/2025 Kasey Clark Greg Gilbert PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: In N Out Awning MOD: A Modification Application (Planning Review Only) to remove three existing canvas awnings and replace with three illuminated non -turnbuckle aluminum canopies located at 30697 Temecula Parkway. PA25-0168 959-400-001 Scott Cooper 04/25/2025 Dena Upp escrow acct WOODSIDE 05S PL Residential Plan Review Temecula, CA 5074 authorized Tract Product user Review Case Title / Description: Elderberry Park HPR: Home Product Review for Elderberry Park to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 164 lots. Page 4 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA25-0169 26463 Ynez Rd 910-300-014 Katie Garcia 04/25/2025 Chansler KIMCO PALM PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Skousen PLAZA Use Permit Case Title / Description: Girls Day Out Market TUP: A Temporary Use Permit (Major) for a vendor market that will include local vendors and food at the parking lot of 26463 Ynez Road from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM on May 3, 2025. PA25-0172 28699 Old Town Front St 922-046-028 Yannin Marquez 04/30/2025 PL Modifications Applied Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Baily's Patio MOD: A Modification Application for a new outdoor patio enclosure that consists of a total of 139 lineal feet of fence, 122 lineal feet of addition to the shade structure. On the east side of the building, five windows will be replaced with four single doors and one double door and on the north end of the building three existing double doors will be replaced with new double doors. The project is located at 28699 Old Town Front Street. PA25-0173 40665 Winchester Rd , 4-6 910-290-006 Yannin Marquez 04/30/2025 Ian Quinn Winchester PL Modifications Applied Temecula, CA 92591 Marketplace Case Title / Description: Trader Joe's Enclosure MOD: A Modification Application for a 20' by 20' enclosure on the rear of Trader Joe's unit located at 40665 Winchester Road. PREAPP25-0 26493 Ynez Rd 910-300-018 Marcella Mills 04/15/2025 Andrew Hinman KIMCO PALM PL Completed 151 Temecula, CA 92591 PLAZA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Goldfish Swim School CUP: a Pre -Application for Goldfish Swim School to operate a children's swim school under a Conditional Use Permit at 26493 Ynez Road, Suite B. PREAPP25-0 27520 Ynez Rd 921-320-056 Yannin Marquez 04/23/2025 Andrew Hinman HENKIN GROUP PL Plan Review 165 Temecula, CA 92591 II Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Launch Family Entertainment CUP: A Pre -Application for a Conditional Use Permit with no site changes for an indoor entertainment center with attractions that include trampoline courts, ninja courses, laser tag, arcade games, climbing walls and dedicated toddler zones with a cafe with full -service bar at 27520 Ynez Road. Page 5 of 5 Item No. 18 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Report for April 2025. Tyren Hundley, Management Analyst That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly CITY OF TEMECULA kc1VE,p&f'A FIRE DEPARTMENT Operations Prevention Trainin Emer enc Mana ement p � � g� g Y g Ines APRIL CALL BREAKDOWN TYPE COMMERCIAL FIRE O MULTI -FAMILY FIRE O RESIDENTIAL FIRE 3 WILDLAND FIRE 1 VEHICLE FIRE O OTHER FIRE G RESCUE RINGING ALARM 3 FALSE ALARM G1 HAZMAT 1 TOTAL: 76 MONTHLY REPORT I APRIL 2025 EAR 1 2 Truck I I Squad TYPE: # TRAFFIC COLLISION 57 MEDICAL EMERGENCY GG4 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 8 PUBLIC ASSIST 23 STANDBY 12 TOTAL: 764 Population - 112J94 APRIL 2025 Other False Alarm Fires TC Medical Emergencies ISO Rating 2025 Year to Date Calls 3,540 CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPAMWENT Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management FIREHOUSE FAMILY I RETREAT2025 RECAP Lai '1 � CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management PLAN CHECKS/REVIEWS 484 YTD: 2,004 CONSTRUCTIO INSPECTIONS 454 YTD:1,7B1 MONTHLY REPORT APRIL 2025 APRIL INSPECTION BREAKDOWN SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS 0 YTD: 4 ANNUAL 9 STATE MANDATED INSPECTIONS 506 YTD:1,5D2 PUBLIC INO.UIRIES 46 YTD:180 CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT -i %I Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management(7e/,4,a MONTHLY REPORT I APRIL 2025 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS: • The City of Temecula and Southern California Edison have entered into an agreement to provide a Community Resilience Center (CRC) in the city during PSPS events to support the community • OEM has begun the planning process to develop the City -Wide Mass Evacuation Plan • Attended a PIRS for Wildfire Meeting with Community Development where Emergency Management planning wi be incorporated into the process and within the scorecard • OEM O TEE attended the Wolf Creek Safety Fair on Saturday the loth of April • Completed 2,d CERT Course of the year graduating 17 students TEE VOLUNTEER PROGRAM # of hours contributed: 803 # of TEE Volunteers: 59 # of volunteer meetings: 2 # of Activations: 0 # of hours YTD: 2,413 # of public contacts YTD: 227 # of training events: I # of Activation Hours Worked YTD: 0 # of Public Events YTD: 3 PLANNED COMMUNITY EVENTS SUPPORTED:1 CITY RESPONSE: 0 PREPAREDNESS TRAINING / EVENTS • Community Presentations: 0 • Community Training: 2 • Community Preparedness Backpacks: 1 • YTD:23 Total:381 GRANTS 0 CLAIMS: • SHSP Grant — Pending Award • EMPG Grant — Pending Award EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER Activations: 0 Current Status: Normal Operations Item No. 19 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mark Rigali, Captain DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (March 2025) PREPARED BY: Jeret McClellan, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the Temecula Sheriff's Station activity for March 2025. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service.................................................................................................5,459 "Priority One" calls for service......................................................................................................58 Average response time for "Priority One" calls...........................................................6.55 minutes VOLUNTEERS Chaplain.........................................................................................................................................95 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours..................................................................................496.55 Reserve officer hours (patrol)..........................................................................................................0 Explorer..........................................................................................................................................52 Station/Administration..............................................................................................................49.50 TotalVolunteer hours.............................................................................................................683.55 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served.....................................................................................306 Fingerprints/Live Scan.....................................................................................105 Policereports filed.............................................................................................13 Citationssigned off............................................................................................4 Totalreceipts...........................................................................................................................$7,147 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings...........................................................................4 Safety presentations/Training................................................................................1 Specialevents...................................................................................................................................4 Residential/Business security surveys conducted............................................................................0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up.................................................................0 StationTours....................................................................................................................................0 PlanningReview Projects.......................................................................................2 TempOutdoor Use Permits....................................................................................4 SPECIAL TEAMS (CORE) ReportsWritten................................................................................................22 Onsight felony arrests.....................................................................................................................1 On sight misdemeanor arrests................................................................................9 Felony arrest warrants served.................................................................................0 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served ...............................................................................................7 AreaChecks...................................................................................................107 CampChecks..................................................................................................7 PedestrianChecks.....................................................................................................74 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks..................................................................................................... 4/2 Outreach attempts / Success...................................................................................................... 13/1 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team) On sight, felony arrests...................................................................................... I I Onsight, misdemeanor arrests.......................................................................................................29 Felony arrest warrants served........................................................................................................ I I Misdemeanor arrest warrants served.............................................................................................32 Bar/Business checks......................................................................................................................90 D.U.I. Arrests................................................................................................................................14 Traffic/Parking citations.............................................................................................................125 FirearmsSeized................................................................................................0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team) Onsight felony arrests.....................................................................................................................9 Onsight misdemeanor arrests.........................................................................................................11 Felony arrest warrants served...........................................................................................................2 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served................................................................................................4 Follow-up investigations/search warrants...................................................................53 Parole/Probation Searches.............................................................................................................20 PedestrianChecks...................................................................................................6 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks......................................................................................................101 MarijuanaDispensary Checks.........................................................................................................0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Robbery/ Burglary Suppression Team) BeginningCaseload.......................................................................................................................78 TotalCases Assigned....................................................................................................................13 TotalCases Closed..........................................................................................................................4 Search Warrants prepared/served.................................................................................................14 Arrests..............................................................................................................................................6 Outof Custody Filings............................................................................................0 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations....................................................................................820 Non -hazardous citations...............................................................................................................151 Parkingcitations...........................................................................................................................276 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations.........................................................82 Seatbelts........................................................................................................................................... I CellPhone Cites...........................................................................................................................173 Injurycollisions.............................................................................................................................19 D.U.I. Arrests.................................................................................................................................36 Grant -funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints/saturation enforcement........................................0 Grant -funded traffic click it or ticket/traffic enforcement..............................................................4 INVESTIGATIONS BeginningCaseload..................................................................................................................... III TotalCases Assigned....................................................................................................................29 TotalCases Closed........................................................................................................................18 Search Warrants prepared/served.................................................................................................29 Arrests..............................................................................................................................................7 Outof Custody Filings............................................................................................5 Sex Offenders Processed/ Compliance Checks...........................................................16 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Callsfor service...........................................................................................................................116 Felonyarrest/filings.........................................................................................................................2 Misdemeanorarrest/filings............................................................................................................13 TrafficCitations................................................................................................I Totalcustomers served................................................................................................................700 Fingerprints/Live Scans...............................................................................................................168 Totalreceipts........................................................................................ $8,320.00 SCHOOL RESOURCE DEPUTIES Felonyarrest..................................................................................................................................... I Misdemeanorarrests........................................................................................................................2 Reports...........................................................................................................................................13 Citations.........................................................................................................................................27 Meetings/Presentations................................................................................................................130 Ir. I I ; YY:Iw-w: CAPTAIN MARK RIGALI LA:16 APRIL 2025 PART 1 CRIMES �NERI/�� E Part 1 Crime Homicide March 0 April 0 Rape 1 2 Robbery 3 3 Aggravated Assault 39 26 Burglary 13 13 Vehicle Theft 7 4 Larceny Theft 142 104 Arson 1 1 Total Property Crime Comparison by Year 4 104 2025 OM 13 1 ■ Vehicle Theft ■ LarcenyTheft ■ 20 ■ Burglary 152 ■ Arson 2024 IF30 0 50 100 150 200 Total Violent Crime Comparison by Year 3 2025 2 26 ■ Robbery ■ Rape ■ 6 ■ Aggravated 2024 62 Assault 32 0 20 40 Total Two Year Data Comparison for April 200 152 150 104 100 ■ 2024 50 32 26 30 13 20 ■ 2025 0 ■■ 1 ■ 2 2 6 3 - 4 Aggravated Arson Burglary LarcenyTheft Rape Robbery Vehicle Theft Assault RESPONSE TIME Average Response Times by Month 25 20.51 20 16.01 16.61 17.88 15 10.21 11.28 15 on 16 11Priority - - 0 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Sum of March ■ Sum of April Priority 1: Involved circumstances that pose, or did pose in the immediate past, a clearly defined threat to human life or property and which involve a high level of violence or the potentialfor serious injury. Priority 2: Involve circumstances of an urgent, but not life -threatening nature. They are generally disturbances with a potentialfor violence, minor assaults and batteries, etc. Priority 3: Involve circumstances which are neither urgent, nor life threatening. Priority4: With the exception of several felonies, most past incidents are considered Priority4. Priority 9: Those calls meeting the criteria for processing by the Telephone Report Unit (TRU). Priority9 69 1% Priority4,1183, 21% Priority 3, 2304, 41% Total Calls For Service by Priority Priority 1,62,1% Priority 1 62 Priority 2 2071 I Priority 3 2304 Priority 4 1183 Priority2,2071, Priority 69 36% ■ Priority 1 ■ Priority 2 ■ Priority 3 ■ Priority 4 ■ Priority 9 INVESTIGATIONS*M ( 0* Beginning Caseload Number of Assigned Cases AprilActivity 122 30 Number of Closed Cases 13 Number of Arrests 3 Number of Search Warrants Written 53 Out of Custody Filings 2 Phone Downloads 25 Supplemental Reports 22 Patrol Assist Call Outs Forensic Interviews ( Sex & Physical Abuse) 0 3 5 Investigators received information regarding a report of a past 288P.C. - Lewd or Lascivious act with a minor. They located the suspect's current residence using phone records, Flock, and surveillance. On 4/24 Investigations served a search warrant at Marco Romanenko's current location and arrested him for 288P.C. and 311 P.C. - Possession of Child Pornography. Marco Romanenko Male adult INVESTIGATIONS On 4/11/25, Patrol deputies responded to the 42000 block of Moraga Road, for a stab victim. The suspect, Zachary Belagasem, was also apprehended near the scene. The scene was stabilized, and investigators were called to the scene. Investigators processed the crime scene with the Sheriff Forensic Services Bureau and numerous pieces of evidence were collected. Investigators collected nearby surveillance video and interviewed witnesses. The suspect was booked into custody for attempt murder charges. The investigation revealed the suspect stabbed his mother multiple times and she escaped the attack. The victim was treated at a local hospital and expected to survive. TE-251010044 Zachary Belagasem Male adult Investigator Gasparini completed a complex fraud investigation involving a local car dealership victimized by two suspects. The suspects created a shell company and embezzled over $500,000 from the dealership over the course of a year through false subcontract work. Through a series of search warrants, Investigator Gasparini was able to trace the funds back to the suspects. Over 659 counts of theft by false pretense were charged on the suspects. One suspect was apprehended returning from vacation from Mexico at the San Ysidro port of entry. The second suspect was apprehended in Escondido. TE243120173 INVESTIGATIONS . ob Total # of Sex Registrants 136* Total # of Arson Registrants 9 Total # of Sex Offenders processed 16 Total # of Transient Sex I Arson Registrants 7 Total of Registration Events In Violation 0 Arrests 1 Criminal Filings 1 Patrol Assist *This total reflects all the registrants within the Southwest Station area of responsibility. Riverside County has over 4,200 sex registrants. Sex Registrants Statistics RIVERSIDE COUNTY #o 5k Tota I: 4,237 In Violation: 267 2.5k Transient: 319 0 � � sVP: 1 Total In Violation Transient SVP Sex Registrant Tier Level Count Percentage Totil 4,237 100% Ter 1 -Adult 747 18 % Ter 2-Adult 1,057 25 % Tier 3-Lifetime 1,982 479k Tier 3- Risk Assessment Level 79 2% Tier 1-Juvenile 1 0% Tier 2-Juvenile 45 1% Ter T9D 324 S% No Ter Status 1 0% NIA 0 0% Tier 1 - Adult 0 Tier 2 - Adult Tier 3 - Lifetime 0 Tier 3 - Risk Assessment Level •Tier 1 -juvenile •Tier 2 -Juvenile Tier T9 ❑ • No Tier Status NIA SET Team Activity On -Sight Felony Arrests March 25 On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests 12 Felony Arrest Warrants Served 3 Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served 8 Follow — up Investigations / Search Warrants 29 Parole / Probation Searches 25 Pedestrian Checks 4 Traffic Stops / Vehicle Checks Narcotics Marijuana Dispensary Checks 14 0 Justin Hopkinson Male adult In March, Hopkinson was arrested for vehicle burglary, methamphetamine sales, and parole/probation violation. SET Deputies placed a GPS tracker on Hopkinson's vehicle which showed he was frequenting Home Depot and Lowe's stores in the areas of Riverside & San Bernardino counties. On 4/28, SET Deputies contacted Home Depot and Lowes and learned Hopkinson was identified as a suspect who stole multiple items from different locations. SET authored a search warrant at his residence. They located a stolen vehicle, stolen merchandise from Home Depot, methamphetamine, and fentanyl. He was arrested for 3455P.C. Violation of Community Supervision, 459P.C. - Burglary, 487P.C. - Larceny Theft, 496P.C. - Possession of stolen property, and HS11395 - Possession of methamphetamines. SET On 4/10 SET Deputies received intel from a School Resource Deputy that a subject is selling marijuana to minors through a Snapchat account. SET identified the account operator as Luis Gomez Arcos. Surveillance and additional intel was gathered. SET Deputies served search warrants at his residence in Murrieta, and his girlfriend's residence in Temecula. They located Xanax pills, alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco vapes. He was arrested for HS11360(A) — Sale and Transportation of Marijuana, and HS11375(B) — Possession of Sedatives. Below are posts from his Snapchat account and the recovered items. cad w-- sir Luis Gomez Arcos Male adult SET SET Deputies have been gathering intel of a subject suspected of narcotic sales and supplying drugs to dealers in the Temecula area. On 4/24 SET Deputies served a search warrant at the suspect's residence. They arrested 4 subjects connected to the suspect for multiple drug charges, parole violations, and outstanding warrants. Deputies located items consistent with drug sales, and $8K in cash. 4 � 03�- y ' .+ ��'1111 ���1 Victor Torres Male adult Jamie Laheist Female adult Angela Holt Female adult Oscar Gomez Male adult L01 Alex Cogox-Ponce Male adult r St1SR1FA I � 2 ��S►DE C�J nning Caseload 94 otal Cases Assigned 10 Total Cases Closed 23 Search Warrants prepared / served 14 Total Arrests 7 Out of Custody Filings 7 Notable Cases On 4/02 a residential burglary occurred in the 28000 block of Savannah Dr., Temecula. Investigation revealed several juveniles were involved in the incident and had taken an E- bike, jewelry, money, alcohol, and a PlayStation 5. One juvenile came forward and named the other juveniles. Further investigation revealed one the juvenile's residence came back to a subject ( parent ) who is on mandatory •� supervision. On 4/16 RBST Deputies served a search warrant at the residence of one of the suspects. Several items of Andrew Fistonich evidence were seized. The parent of the suspect, Andrew Male adult Fistonich, is on mandatory supervision with RASP. They Located 9.4 grams of methamphetamine in the parent's bedroom. Fistonich was arrested for HS11395 - Possession of Marijuana for Sale, HS11377 - Possession of narcotics, HS11364 - Possession of unlawful paraphernalia, 1203.2P.C. - Violation of Probation, and 273aP.C. - Child Endangerment. The juvenile was arrested for 459P.C. - Residential burglary. 10 yt1ER1FA I � 2 ��S�DE COJ In January, RBST was investigating a series of residential burglaries that took place in the city and surrounding. They identified the vehicle used during the burglary was a rental car. A search warrant was conducted and identified three phone numbers connected to the vehicle's infotainment system, during the time frame of the burglaries. The phones belonged to Solomon Johnson, Ricky Sykes, and Aaron Anderson. On 4/8 RBST Deputies conducted search warrants at their residences. All 3 suspects were arrested for 459P.C. — Burglary, and 182P.C. — Conspiracy to commit crime. Rickey Sykes Male adult 1 �1 Solomon Johnson Jr. Aaron Anderson Male adult Male adult Prop 36 arrest: On 04/29 RBST Deputies arrested Eric Cohn (Male adult) after identifying him as the suspect in multiple cases of theft dating back from December 2024. It was discovered he was selling stolen merchandise through OfferUp. The items included Home Depot merchandise pictured below. He was arrested for 487(e)P.C. - Grand Theft, 496(a)P.C. — Receiving known stolen property, and 666.1 P.C. — Petty Theft with priors. Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 05/07/2025 Ad CORE TEAM Reports Written On -Sight Felony Arrests On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests Felony Arrest Warrants Served Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served Area Checks Camp Checks Pedestrian Checks Traffic / Vehicle Checks Outreach Attempts / Success Licensed Massage Parlors 13 1 4 2 5 72 6 14 9 25/0 3 Notabie cases ■ On 4/2 CORE Deputies coordinated a buy/walk operation in which a UC officer brokered a deal for sex at Young Spa. After the operation, Deputy Barbula authored a search warrant. During the search, items related to prostitution and $13,369.25 in cash were seized and 1 female was arrested for 266(h)(a)P.C. - Pimping, and 315P.C. - managing a brothel. On 4/2 CORE Deputies coordinated a buy/walk operation in which a UC officer brokered a deal for sex at Garden Spa. On 4/9 CORE Deputies coordinated a second buy/walk operation in which a UC officer brokered a deal for sex at Garden Spa. On 4/18 CORE Deputies coordinated a buy/walk operation in which a UC officer brokered a deal for sex at Garden Spa. After the operation, Deputy D. Hernandez authored a search warrant. During the search, items related to prostitution and $6,596.00 in cash were seized and 3 females were arrested. SUS #1 was determined to be in violation of 315 PC - Managing a Brothel, Sus #2 and Sus #3 were arrested for 647(b) P.C. Prostitution. 0y1ERIF� CORE TEAM 2 ���S�CE COJ Notable Cases On 4/29 CORE Deputies coordinated a buy/walk operation in which a UC officer brokered a deal for sex at Happy Spa. After the operation, Deputy Punzalan authored a search warrant. During the search, items related to prostitution and $1,998.00 in cash were seized and 1 female was arrested for 647(b) P.C. Prostitution. In collaboration with the City H.O.T and Social Workers Action Group (S.W.A.G.) the following / accepted or denied resources: 4/2 - R. Byrd ( Female adult), A. Avalos ( Female adult), A. Reynoso ( Female adult), F. Avena ( Male adult) J. Dinwiddle ( Male adult) -declined 4/9 - D. Shull ( Male adult) B. Groom ( Female adult) - declined 4/10 - R. Toscano ( Male adult ), P. Watz ( Male adult ), G. Wilson ( Male adult ), M. Farner ( Male adult) - declined 4/16 - J. Velasquez ( Male adult), Y. Espinoza ( Female adult) - declined 4/17 - J. Phillips ( Male adult ), R. Byrd ( Female adult ), A. Stiles ( Male adult ), M. Priesing ( Male adult), M. Villafane ( Male adult), A. Arroza ( Female adult) - declined 4/30 - J. Parton ( Male adult), C. Coelo ( Male adult), B. Hall ( Male adult)- declined SOUTHWEST NITRO DISTRICT TEAM On -Sight Felony Arrests On -Sight Misdemeanor Arrests 6 25 Felony Arrest Warrants Served 7 Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants Served 45 Bar / Business Check D.U.I. Arrests 80 14 Traffic / Parking Citations 147 Firearms Seized 1 TRAFFIC TEAM Traffic Citations issued for Hazardous Violations April 1394 Non -Hazardous Citations 256 Parking Citations 196 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program ( S.L.A.P.) Citations 81 Seatbelt Citations 22 Hit & Run Investigations 16 Cell Phone Citations 435 Injury Collisions D.U.I. Arrests OTS / City Funded Special Operations Commercial Enforcement Citations Written Warnings Issued 16 32 3 0 480 On 4/12 Traffic Deputies attempted to pull over a subject for speeding on Temecula Parkway. The subject failed to yield, and a pursuit ensued. The subject drove into a residential area of Meadows Parkway, where he foot bailed from the vehicle. Deputies located the suspect hiding in the bushes. Andrew Romero is a career criminal and had an active warrant. He was arrested for VC2800.2 - Evading Peace Officers / Reckless Driving, 148(A)(1)P.C. - Resisting Arrest, obstructing an Officer, and 3455P.C. - Violation of Community Supervision. Andrew Romero Male adult PROMENADE MALL Total Calls For Service Felony / Arrest Filings Misdemeanor Arrest / Filings Traffic Citations Total Customers Served Fingerprints / Live Scans VICR Releases Total Receipts Aaron Navies Male adult 191 5 6 5 624 123 13 5,866.00 On 4/22 Mall Deputies arrested a sex registrant after he exposed himself to a customer at JC Penney and later exposed himself while masturbating to an employee at Macy's. He was arrested for 314(1)P.C. - Indecent Exposure. r SNERIp� OLD TOWN STOREFRONT SIDE C� Total Customers Served 595 Fingerprints / Live Scan Police Reports Filed VICR Releases Citations signed off Total receipts 111 0 10 16 $5,314.00 Special Events, Rallies, Protests, Meetings 1 • 4/2 - Sheriff' Family Festival Meeting @ BCTC (CSO Hicks & SSO Carrera) • 4/2 - Explorer Meeting (Dep. Hernandez & Dep. Punzalan) • 4/5 - Expressive Activity @ Duck Pond (CORE Deputies) • 4/9 - Explorer Meeting (Dep. Hernandez & Dep. Punzalan) • 4/9 - E-Bike Presentation (Dep. Punzalan & Dep. Barbula) • 4/11 - Special Olympics @ Dorothy McElhinney Middle School (CORE Team) • 4/16 - 4t" of July Traffic Plan Meeting (CORE Team & Traffic) • 4/16 - Explorer Meeting (Dep. Hernandez & Dep. Punzalan) • 4/17 - Deputy Sheriff Trainee Orientation @ SWS (Dep. Hernandez, CSO Hicks, Sgt. Hernandez & SSO Carrera) • 4/18 - Student Venture Ministry Cross Walk (CORE Team) • 4/20 - Reliance Church Easter Egg Hunt (Dep. Rincon) • 4/23 - Explorer Meeting (Dep. Hernandez & Dep. Punzalan) • 4/25 -Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Meeting (CORE Team) • 4/26 - Community Services Expo (Dep. Rincon & Dep. Punzalan) • 4/26 - National Take Back Prescription (CSO Nunez, Dep. Shehata Dep. Barbula & Dep. Au) • 4/26 - Old Navy Safety Event (Dep. Kenitzer & CSO Hicks) • 4/27 - Vail Headquarters Earth Day Event I Team Activity Felony Arrest April 2 Misdemeanor Arrests 3 Reports 14 School Violence Threat Investigations 5 Citations 15 Meetings / Presentations 187 On 4/1 SRD's received intel from FBI/LA regarding an SVT targeting Chaparral High School. FBI received a threat from Snapchat that a user posted a photo of a Google Map showing the high school with a text overlay "5 ss I'll shoot up this school next week". The user lives in Oklahoma. FBI/OK worked with Broken Arrow PD, contacted the user, interviewed her, and determined the threat to be unfounded ( April Fool's prank). On 4/14 SRD's responded to an SVT at Rancho Christian School. A student made a threat about a student to a classmate during school hours. The VP located a pocketknife in his backpack. Deputies contacted the subject and searched the residence. There was no credible threat to any student during the investigation. On 4/21 SRD's investigated an SVT at the Shine Charter Schol. The principle stated a student made statements to another student that she hated all teachers and was gong to shoot up the school. Deputies contacted the subject and the parent. She denied making any statements. No threat to the school, employees, or students was found. SRD ) S~ On 4/22, Deputies investigated a possible threat made via Instagram account "TVHSConfessions2025". A student posted they had always wanted to shoot up the school, but did not have the means to do it. SRD's & Investigators located the student, contacted the parents, and confirmed there were no weapons at the residence. There was no credible threat to the school. On 4/23 Deputies investigated a suspicious cires / SVT reference a student at James Day Middle School. The student drew a picture of an assault rifle in class. He also made a joke he was going to use it to shoot up the school. Deputies contacted the parent of the student and confirmed firearms were secured at the residence, and no credible threat to the school. • Youth Court • Caught with Your Helmet On • School Assemblies • Traffic education and enforcement during pick up/drop off times • Tobacco minor decoy operations CRIME PREVENTION SµERIp� L1WFV,0E Team Activity _= Crime Prevention / Neighborhood watch meetings Safety Presentations / Trainings 3 2 Special Events 4 Residential / Business security surveys conducted 0 Residences / Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours 0 Planning Review Projects 1 Temp Outdoor Use Permits 9 SµERIp� I a � ti 2 SIDENmEi 19 cOJ Team Activity Chaplain Hours April 106.50 Community Action Patrol ( CAP) hours 708.30 Reserve Officer hours ( patrol) 0 Explorer 117.00 Station / Administration 8.50 Total Volunteer hours 967.30 Riverside Sheriff's Volunteer Mounted Posse Prepared by CA M. Chiodo 05/07/2025 SµERIp� I a � ti 2 L��SIDE01111101 cOJ Events / Pictures Temecula Mounted Posse looking for dedicated volunteers! The Mounted Posse is a non-profit group of volunteers who dedicate their time to their communities and the Riverside County Sheriff's Office. The Troops are comprised of both ground support and mounted volunteers who use their personal horses for duties such as the following: • Patrol . • Parades • Search and Rescue • Public Relationsr • Charity Events L �11 li The Temecula Troop is now accepting applications for both mounted and ground support volunteers. We are active throughout the Temecula Valley. Volunteers (and their horses) must pass an annual qualification test, undergo regular training, and attend monthly meetings. TO APPLY YOU MUST: • Be at least 18 years of age • Be physically able to perform required activities • Submit a complete application (including basic background check, fingerprinting, and interview) In addition, mounted volunteers must: • Have access to a healthy, well -trained horse • Have access to a trailer and tow vehicle VOLUNTEER HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION{+ ; Contact: enunezPriversidesheriff.oraiL f. -. SPECIAL EVENTS f April26 Temecula Sheriff Deputies keeping the National Prescription Drug citizens of Temecula safe during the Take Back Day was a success! Sunset Market in Old Town Temecula! Item No. 20 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 27, 2025 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $17,050,991 Status: The environmental Initial Study has been approved, Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted, and Notice of Determination filed in May 2022. Design is 60% complete. Regulatory permit applications must be re- submitted for USACE 404 Nationwide Permit and CDFW Streambed Alteration 1602 due to the change in scope of the Murrietta Creek Phase 213 Project, headed by ACOE and RCFC. Current activities include design coordination with utility purveyors (SCE, RCWD, and EMWD) and City project PW16-05 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, and preparation of regulatory permit applications for SWRCB 401 Water Quality Certification and USACE Section 408. Construction previously anticipated to start in Spring of 2024 is now delayed to Spring of 2027 due to coordination with ACOE and RCFC on their Murrietta Creek Phase 2B Project and the federal Funding of $2M added to project for Federal 26/27 fiscal year. Federal Funding requires completion of NEPA, prior to construction of the project, which is anticipated to take approximately 1 year to complete once funding is authorized. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $138,751,346 Status: Project is under construction May 2023 — July 2025. The project was opened for public use on April 28, 2025. For detailed information, please visit the project website at TemeculaCA.gov/FVP2. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase III, PW19-03 Description: Design and construction of the full width French Valley Parkway from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, including the bridge overcrossing of Interstate 15 and the northbound on -ramps. Cost: $51,696,794 Status: Request For Proposals No. 300 for professional engineering and management services has closed. Three (3) proposals were received by the due date of November 5. Staff has completed the selection process and the professional services agreement was awarded on April 8, 2025. 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description: Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $9,258,710 Status: Construction is substantially complete. The project was opened for public use on October 27, 2024. The contractor will continue working on minor items to address corrective punch list. This work is being coordinated in conjunction with other freeway projects under construction. For detailed information, please visit the project website at TemeculaCA.clov/CongestionRelief. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $28,603,770 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019, meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 90% complete. RCA JPR Conformance is approved. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. Project has received MSHCP conformance. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. 2023 HBP Bridge Update was submitted in August 2023. Caltrans NEPA review took much longer than anticipated but approval was received in October of 2023. CEQA ISMND is complete and the 30-day public review has ended. CEQA was approved at the February 27, 2024, City Council meeting. Construction start is anticipated in FY 2026 / early 2027 depending on availability of HBP funds. Also, additional coordination is required with ACOE and RCFC as Murrietta Creek Phase 2B will likely be in construction concurrently with this project. As of May 2024, Caltrans has authorized full funding of PE and ROW Phases, so all preconstruction activities are authorized for HBP funds at this time. ROW phase has started and is anticipated to be completed by end of 2025/ early 2026. Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $4,930,327 Status: On July 3, 2024, the IS /MND started the 30-day public notice for comments. It was completed on August 2, 2024. 95% plan check comments were completed December 4, 2024. Consultant and staff are working on project right of way requirements and temporary construction easements in conjunction with revisions of 95% plans and constructability. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Rancho California Road Median Improvements, PW23-04 Description: Design and construction of missing raised concrete medians with landscaping between Humber Drive and Butterfield Stage Road. In addition, there will also be construction of missing improvements on the north side of Rancho California Road, between Riesling Court and Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The improvements will include median curbs, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and landscape and irrigation. Cost: $3,895,000 Status: Design in progress. Ynez Road Improvements — Phase I, PW23-02 Description: This project includes widening the easterly side of Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road north roughly 1600 feet, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and striped medians, in coordination with adjacent development. Cost: $3,996,172 Status: This project is currently in design, environmental, and right of way clearance. Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, PW24-08 Description: Roadway rehabilitation of Santiago Road from Ynez Road to the Santiago Road 1-15 overcrossing, Felix Valdez Avenue from Sixth Street to Vincent Moraga Drive, and Rancho Way from Diaz Road and Business Park Drive. Work will generally consist of full -width cold milling of existing asphalt, preparation of grade, placement of Asphalt Concrete Pavement, and crack seal. Work also includes removal and replacement of ADA access ramps, spandrel, and cross gutter, adjustment of existing utilities to grade, installation and removal of temporary video detection, restoration of existing striping, and detector loop removal and replacement. Also included is, pavement rehabilitation of the north parking lot at Birdsall Park. Work will generally consist of localized asphalt repair, preparation of subgrade, placement of asphalt concrete pavement, crack seal, rubberized slurry application, and restoration of existing striping. Cost: $2,100,000 Status: Posted on PlanetBids on 4/2/2025. Bids Opened 4/30/2025. Anticipate Construction start June/July 2025. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting, PW21-16 Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road. Cost: $852,808 Status: Project needs an encroachment permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Construction is estimated to begin by Summer 2025. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $10,708,232 Status: Design for Phase 2 is continuing. Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide (System Master Plan), PW 22-03 Description: This project will develop a communications masterplan that will provide a strategic plan outlining the approach and buildout design of fiber optic cable and conduit throughout the City. The masterplan document will provide a roadmap to connect all existing and future traffic signals, traffic monitoring devices, surveillance cameras, and City facilities to City -owned fiber communication lines. The primary objective of the project is to upgrade the City's current fiber optic communication system to accommodate its future requirements. Cost: $120,150 Status: The project design has just commenced, and the consultant is working on an existing systems assessment. Documents are being developed. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage, PW19-13 Description: Project consists of adding a second garage in the rear of the property to park the squad and Urban Search and Rescue (USR) vehicle, along with a gym and storage rooms. The construction is anticipated to be completed in the Fiscal Year 2025/26. Cost: $4,235,257 Status: Project is going through the JPR with the RCA. Bidding is scheduled for July 2025. Fire Station 84 Renovation, PW19-14 Description: This project includes the design, construction, and renovation of Fire Station 84. The renovations include adding a Wellness Room, expanding the Storage Room, and upgrading the Training Room. Also, the upgrades include electrical, windows, flooring, paint, tile, HVAC, cabinets, plumbing fixtures, garage bay doors and any necessary improvements needed to conform to ADA accessibility access. Cost: $2,725,074 Status: Preparing a phasing plan that will allow the Fire personnel to maintain their occupancy of the building during construction. Revisiting some of the planned improvements. Anticipate re -bidding the construction contract in Summer 2025. Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $3,630,295 Status: Project is in construction. Estimated completion date in August 2025. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II, Margarita Road Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Construction of the under -crossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect the pedestrian/bicycle trail. Cost: $5,600,123 Status: Construction contract was awarded by City Council on May 14, 2024. Construction work started on July 29, 2024, and is expected to be completed mid -May 2025. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland Drive to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland Drive to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $197,000 Status: Construction started in October 2024. Final contract items are pending completion. Expected completion end of May 2025. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $957,124. Status: Project plans are 90% complete and under City review. Project will go out to bid in Summer 2025. Sixth Street Improvements, PW22-16 [Formerly, "Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements - South Side of Sixth Street (Old Town Front Street to Mercedes Street)"] Description: This project involves adding and improving sidewalks on the south side of Sixth Street in Old Town from Old Town Front Street to Mercedes Street. The improvements include adding sidewalks, concrete ramp bulb outs, rolled curb and gutter, streetlights, and trees in accordance with the Old Town Specific Plan. Cost: $972,326 Status: The construction contract was awarded at the August 13, 2024, City Council Meeting. Construction started on September 3, 2024. Construction is complete. Notice of Completion was recorded on April 22, 2025. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Southside Parking Lot Reconfiguration, PW15-07 Description: This project includes rehabilitation and reconstruction of the existing parking lot. Work includes removal, rehabilitation, and/or replacement of pavement, restriping the parking to the temporary and final conditions, modification of the existing lighting system, construction curbs and islands, installation of bollards, installation of wheel stops, construction of water quality treatment features, and planting of trees and shrubs. Cost: $1,250,750 Status: The project is complete.. Estimated close out June 2025. Sidewalks - Citywide, PW 24-06 Description: Sidewalk and other concrete repairs citywide. Cost: $605,000. Status: Project opened bids on May 8, 2025. Construction is expected to begin in July 2025. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Murrieta Creek Improvements — Trail Lights, PW21-13 Description: This portion of the project involves installing 27 solar lights along the Murrieta Creek trail on the east side of the creek from Rancho California Road to First Street. Cost: $200,000 Status: Riverside County Flood Control 4098 encroachment permit has been acquired with a September 26, 2025, end date. A US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 408 permit has been acquired with a September 16, 2026 end date. The specifications are being prepared. Anticipate construction bids mid -May 2025 with construction to begin in July of 2025. Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms, PW23-18 Description: This project provides for the design and construction of a new restroom facility at Long Canyon Creek Park that meets current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Cost: $1,307,930 Status: This project is currently in design. The consultant submitted the 90% plan check in April 2025. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field Restroom Building (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements). Cost: $1,127,800 Status: The construction contract was awarded to Leslie Gunner Campbell Construction by City Council on March 11, 2025. Construction is anticipated to start in April 2025. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink, PW22-06 Description: This project will include the renovation of the existing hockey rink to install new flooring material, arena style roof structure, bleachers, and various ADA compliance improvements. Cost: $3,620,406 Status: Construction started in April 2025. Anticipated completion by January of 2026. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT May 27, 2025 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park, PW22-07 Description: Remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art skate plaza elements. Cost: $4,160,000 Status: Project is in the design stage. Final design began in February 2024 and construction is anticipated to begin in FalUWinter 2025-26. Vail Ranch Park Restrooms, PW23-06 Description: This project provides for the design and construction of a new restroom facility at Vail Ranch Park that meets current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Cost: $1,322,930 Status: This project is currently in design. REQUEST TO SPEAK FORMS, ELECTRONIC COMMENTS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD REQUEST TO SPEAK ;,. CITY OF TEMECULA P Date: /. Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: 7 Agenda Item: fl Item Description or Item No. A/rA r ` Pa racG Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.�' ) k Address: `�(/ ,-1-r�� Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: /�f1 / -60 S 4 ' ; t— om A ./e6-1`!C c�-J /� tJd l v' Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "11 fr,4� REQUEST TO SPEAK - K CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: 5/z 7 Zc Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: <, Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. I/� Name: ��"(IQ[S �3A'W Phone Number: Address: � Email address: ( If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ft REQUEST TO SPEAK .� CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Cry �i� Lam/Date: Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: IN Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record Name: ‘rt4 Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. t,_,v REQUEST TO SPEAK ,ft .,: CITY OF TEMECULA it 1989 Date: -S' a 7 - a 5- -Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: (I Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ll Name: CD A Gz-ei2 MIS Av Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: AA, 2 2 1 Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item741 Agenda Item: 1 Item Description or Item No. pc..c 4,L c T Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the recd. {� Address: , Email address: - If you are representin organization,p r group,��please give the�njame:I `y-- Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: /// i� O), Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: j] Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. • Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ��®® / // � Name lG�ll. � Phone Number: % Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "F"""? REQUEST TO SPEAK ,,. 40' .,� CITY OF TEMECULA ,9S9 Date: 8 - a7- a5 Public Comment: Non Agenda Item: I v l Agenda Item Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. 1 n Address: L Email address: -k-\ is 0 4.-elA tAkrolaY1� k-Lim 1 I - CbNM If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: "T . rn pn QQ.rWtU' 1- C l tQr Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. „,.„ yio REQUEST TO SPEAK i ik* ., CITY OF TEMECULA 1 1989 - Date: ,r, i ” Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.Name: P,JOVti( ticiu Qt\(9 Phone Number: ° Address: `` �`,� - Email address: {�; QUUI a. el `{�/�Q�QJ4 Vv r\AAD 1t ETCJ I n±I I. coil If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: kkt. pQ ularinA0it- Caiii-JP r: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Brenden Kalfus s1�-71�5 D F May 27, 2025 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California Re: Proposed Amendments to the City's ADU Ordinance By email: zak.schwank@temeculaca.gov;jessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov; james.stewart@temeculaca.gov; brenden.kalfus®temeculaca.gov; matt.rahn@temeculaca.gov; CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Cc: aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov; Randi.Johl@temeculaca.gov; matt.peters[atemeculaca.gov; pthorson@rwglaw.com Dear Temecula City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund("CalHDF")submits this letter as a public comment for agenda item 4 for the Council meeting of May 27,2025,a proposed amendment to the City's regulations for ADUs and JADUs.CalHDF appreciates that the City is updating its ordinance to keep pace with changes in state law.However,the proposed ordinance fails to comply with state law in one specific way,and the City should address this issue before approving the ordinance. Background The law gives local governments authority to enact zoning ordinances that implement a variety of development standards on ADUs.(Gov.Code, § 66314.)The standards in these local ordinances are limited by state law so as not to overly restrict ADU development.(See id.) Separately from local ADU ordinances,Government Code section 66323 establishes a narrower set of ADU types that local governments have a ministerial duty to approve. "Notwithstanding Sections 66314 to 66322...a local agency shall ministerially approve"these types of ADUs.(Id.at subd.(a).)This means that ADUs that satisfy the minimal requirements of section 66323 must be approved regardless of any contrary provisions of the local ADU ordinance.(Ibid.)Local governments may not impose their own standards on such ADUs. (Gov.Code, § 66323,subd.(b) ["A local agency shall not impose any objective development or design standard that is not authorized by this section upon any accessory dwelling unit that meets the requirements of any of paragraphs(1)to(4),inclusive,of subdivision(a)."].) 2221 Broadway, PH1, Oakland,CA 94612 hi@calhdf.org In addition,ADUs that qualify for the protections of Government Code section 66323,like other ADUs,must be processed by local governments within 60 days of a complete permit application submittal.(Gov.Code, § 66317,subd.(a).) State law also prohibits creating regulations on ADU development not explicitly allowed by state law.Government Code Section 66315 states,"No additional standards,other than those provided in Section 66314,shall be used or imposed,including an owner-occupant requirement,except that a local agency may require that the property may be used for rentals of terms 30 days or longer." Impermissible Deed Restriction Requirement Code sections 17.23.030(C)and 17.23.050(D)require a deed restriction to be placed on a property as a condition of developing an ADU.This is a clear violation of Government Code section 66323,which prohibits any standards not explicitly authorized in that section.Deed restrictions are also not permitted by Government Code section 66315,which forbids standards not listed in section 66314. The California Department of Housing and Community Development("HCD")has communicated that such deed restrictions are unlawful.The January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook specifically forbids deed restrictions as a condition of ADU development(see page 22):"A local agency cannot impose a deed restriction on an ADU." Additionally,such deed restrictions imposed on ADUs(or on other accessory structures)are unenforceable.This is due to the absence of horizontal privity between the City and the applicant.In other words,since the City does not own the applicant's property at the time of the application,and does not own a neighboring property to whose benefit the proposed restriction(s)redound,black letter property law bars the restrictions from binding future property owners.(See,e.g.,Scaringe v.J. C. C.Enters(1988)205 Cal.App.3d 1536 [describing the types of privity relationship between covenanting parties that allow enforcement of a deed restriction];see also Civ.Code, §§1460 et seq.) The City should therefore amend the proposed ordinance to remove the deed restriction requirement. ♦ ♦ ♦ CalHDF appreciates the City's effort to implement state law governing ADU construction. However,the City should amend its ordinance to ensure that it complies with state law by removing the illegal deed restriction requirement. 2of3 CalHDF is a 501(c)(3)non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels,including low-income households.You may learn more about CalHDF at www.calhdf.org. Sincerely, C = ---- Dylan Casey CalHDF Executive Director PN,N), l_ -51/4ec James M.Lloyd Ca1HDF Director of Planning and Investigations 3of3