Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02272025 DH Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S HEARING MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 27, 2025 - 1:30 PM CALL TO ORDER: Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Director of Community Development on items that are not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Director of Community Development on an item not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the staff liaison. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward. For all items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the staff liaison. On those items, each speaker is limited to five minutes. Item No. 1 1:30 PM Project Number: PA23-0341 Project Type: Development Plan Project Title: Texas Roadhouse Restaurant Applicant: Texas Roadhouse Project Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant Location: 40710 Winchester Road Environmental Action: No further environmental review required Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Project Planner: Scott Cooper, Case Planner ADJOURNMENT NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding an item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. ITEb1 NO. 1 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING TO: Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development FROM: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner DATE OF MEETING: February 27, 2025 PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA23-0341, a Development Plan for an SUMMARY: approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Texas Roadhouse General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing Parking Lot / Community Commercial (CC) North: Existing Commercial Buildings / Community Commercial (CC) South: Promenade Temecula / Community Commercial (CC) East: Existing Parking Lot / Community Commercial (CC) West: Existing Parking Lot / Community Commercial (CC) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Landscape Area/Coverage: 18.2% 15% Minimum Parking Provided/Required: 40 Parking Spaces 40 Parking Spaces AFFORDABLEIWORKFORCE HOUSING Located in Housing Element Vacant Sites Inventory? ❑ Yes ® No Located in Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ)? ❑ Yes ® No AHOZ Gain/Loss: Not Applicable BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 24, 2023, Texas Roadhouse submitted a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project is located within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan which allows for the development of a restaurant. The applicant seeks to construct a new approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant. The proposed restaurant includes a bar/lounge area and an outdoor patio dining area The vehicular access to the project is from existing traffic circulation within the Promenade Temecula including direct access from Ring Road. Pedestrian access is also provided as there is an existing cross walk located to the north of the project crossing Ring Road at an existing traffic signal leading to an accessible route to the front door/waiting area of the restaurant. The project is required to provide 40 parking spaces for a restaurant use per the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The project proposes 40 parking spaces along with motorcycle and bicycle parking. Architecture The architectural design of the project features four-sided architecture that incorporates stone, brick, lap siding, standing seam metal roof, and varying paint colors. The building is architecturally designed to bring visual interest and articulation to the highly visible portion of the Promenade Temecula adjacent to Ring Road. Landscaping The project would provide 18.2% landscaping which exceeds the minimum 15% landscape requirement of the Specific Plan. Plant types include: Chinese Pistache trees, Spartan Juniper, Boston Ivy, and Coyote Bush. Alcohol Service As this project is located within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan a Conditional Use Permit allowing for the sale of distilled spirits is not required for this project. The applicant will still need to obtain the proper California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control license in order to serve wine, beer, and distilled spirits. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press -Enterprise on February 14, 2025, and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved on January 28, 2003 by the adoption of No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-XX. An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on September 26, 2006. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Temecula Regional Center EIR and Addendum. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and Addendum; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum. K7 FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.17) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because a restaurant is an allowable use within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. 3. 4. Aerial Map DH Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Plan Reductions Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing 910-420-029 CITY OF TEMECULA PA23-0341 1:2,400 Date Created. 8/29/2023 rf.; H,_:• .r ��._.. _ Wme Country The map PA23.0341 mzd Is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https 1/temeculaca gov/gis DH RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE INTERIM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA23-0341, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 8,000 SQUARE FOOT TEXAS ROADHOUSE RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 40710 WINCHESTER ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 910-420- 029) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Interim Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 4, 2023, Texas Roadhouse filed Planning Application No. PA23-0341, a Development Plan Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Interim Director of Community Development, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on February 27, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Interim Director of Community Development approved Planning Application No. PA23-0341 subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. P23-0341, conformed to the City of Temecula's General Plan Development Code. Section 2. Further Findings. The Interim Director of Community Development, in approving Planning Application No. PA23-0341, hereby makes the following findings as required by Development Code Section 17.05.010.F (Development Plan). A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.; The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because a restaurant is an allowable use within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Interim Director of Community Development hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved on January 28, 2003 by the adoption of No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2025- XX An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on September 26, 2006 The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Temecula Regional Center EIR and Addendum. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and Addendum; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for an approximately 8, 000 square foot restaurant is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum. Section 4. Conditions. The Interim Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA23-0341, a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, and Plan Reductions set forth on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Interim Director of Community Development this 27th day of February, 2025. Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development I, Denise Jacobo, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that the forgoing DH Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Interim Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27tn day of February, 2025 Denise Jacobo, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA23-0341 Project Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-420-029 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Service Commercial TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Quimby Category: N/A (non-residential project) New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) Approval Date: February 27, 2025 Expiration Date: February 27, 2028 PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 17 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANTACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. General Requirements 2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Page 2 of 17 3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 5. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. Page 3 of 17 11. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Fiber Cement Siding Trim, Fiashing, Gutters Brick Veneer Stone Veneer Metal Roof Color Summer Wheat __ JShermanShermanVVlllldl-_l_l (VI-CCII) Commercial Brick Corporation (Homestead) Provia Dry Stack (Ottawa) Metal Sales, 5V-Crimp, Galvalume 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover in accordance with T.M.C. 17.10.020.S 16. Roof Mounted Mechanical Equipment Screening. The applicant shall be required to screen all roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right of ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right of way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening that shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 20. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. Page 4 of 17 21. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Page 5 of 17 22. Inadvertent Finds.. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to Project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with tho Native American Tribe(s). Tribal cultural resources are excluded from the definition of unique cultural resources as those resources are defined by the tribal values ascribed to them by their affiliated communities. Treatment of tribal cultural resources inadvertently discovered during the project's ground -disturbing activities shall be subject to the consultation process required by state law; i. Ali ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, the Tribal Representative(s), and the Planning Director to discuss the significance of the find. ii. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the Tribal Representative(s) and the Project Archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources. iii. Further ground disturbance, including but not limited to grading, trenching, etc., shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal Monitors if needed. iv. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils, and/or re -burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non -Disclosure of Reburial Condition/Mitigation Measures. v. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval before implementation of the said plan. vi. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the Project Applicant and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation of the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, and recommendations of the project archeologist and shall consider the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. vii. Evidence of compliance with this mitigation measure, if a significant archaeological resource is found, shall be provided to the City of Temecula upon the completion of a treatment plan and final report detailing the significance and treatment finding. Page 6 of 17 23. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 24. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 25. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. Developers may request an audit of impact fees and/or may request notice for meetings related to the fee account or fund information. 26. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 27. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. Page 7 of 17 28. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 29. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 30. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper roL'r h and landsca^e. proper p p--- p p p g r. development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 31. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 32. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 33. Precise Gradinq Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 34. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 35. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Page 8of17 36. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 37. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 38. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 39. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 40. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. Outside Agencies 41. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated September 14, 2023, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 42. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated August 7, 2024, a copy of which is attached. 43. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated May 17, 2024, a copy of which is attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 44. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 45. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. Page 9 of 17 46. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 47. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 48. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 49. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 50. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 51. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 52. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 53. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The namc, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml Page 10 of 17 54. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 55. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 56. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 57. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 58. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 59. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 60. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 61. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non -compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. Page 11 of 17 Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 62. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 63. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 6T Improvement Plans All imnrnvamant plane (in�l�dinn but not limited to street; storm drain. �p.� .... .. .1.0--..._.. �.-.._ ., traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 65. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 66. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 67. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 68. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 69. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall he reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 70. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 71. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 72. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. Page 12 of 17 73. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 74. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 75. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 76. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 77. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 78. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 79. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 80. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 81. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 82. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 83. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. W1:7=11111=44vi=1III III [97.1 Page 13 of 17 General Requirements 84. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 '/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 85. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans ara rPviPwpd by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 86. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 87. Fire Requirement (CO2 beverage System). CO2 Beverage System plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 88. Fire Requirement (Hood Extinguishing System). Hood Fire Suppression plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Hood Fire Suppression plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted by a contractor who is licensed and certified to work on said system. Certificates will be required at time of submittal. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 89. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 90. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 91. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Page 14 of 17 92. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall submit electronic copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be electronically signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 93. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 94. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 95. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 96. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 97. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 98. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 99. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 100. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 101. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. Page 15 of 17 102. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 103. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 104. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 105. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. Page 16 of 17 106. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 107. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 108. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. Page 17 of 17 sow xplfN Kra 10 M Ua[CIwW [NdKfuxC MFOR PKPAYEO A xOgE rnwA •ssOCNIU. YK NO pIFO YP] ]9. 1011 !p KOlgw• KOUM.IKN KaKNK 1K IXDILxO SW COxdIWs wp SLBNAp[ wfvwalOx KDIw[axrs Aw PRays[D wHIWw KMr[xalOfi IxOox[ M1YaIC •AOCNI6 YRpr[CI ,q [rA]01) Y[ [66[aVCIW p[IAYJ SK[1S ral wNaw YCIYM' alw5. _ x �— —� A-— As bd C •rwaD _ � ACRiAONGtO _ "" _ V � ',I U KusSKa xuwt I f9 I IfI A I I I s're•u'•sw I I 4! 1 I :1 -.•..•..-.•.-.- Lwrs a mwnaLKlcx AcussN[ aan[ - OrAova,[D wapaq • C4SKp YA10 s' mK9[ir SIXYa•. !' WI[GYL alAOx DaDR[D COMCxCI[ 9pFYNY n. �wvri 1vaN. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Iwo NKr ORUQO Vi9all � a lW a Aa l[YYKU r 1. 4AI[r xO,K[ a LOT IrA NAAAIKNI K:aaD •s D¢ [w xD. mDe-anala. owsux vo. aL...K ,a mpe. araa INpoos a er[aa mwn. curpxw wo a.c Ina[ nunELxwa. aYrwDw fUL[QD. YC SIMJCIUW PW5 ral 41•LS. aaewc u M xauYEsl CaKR a srlD La A. sm nm aLw . vD.n a 4AxAluR[ a 1K sanlNKr YnH4uL tlK[ mlaao wunn SaNwl• x YNR 4MPSRR FN4R xt NM YC SIaKIIIUi PVM ral auu Iwwx. a xw xlxn. IYw )na IIK woos ews vrw.a (aLwxcs Y+[ KUIK 1p PAam IYY Won-1 KaWaY x Wt IYL Vr4i X-q arlW KCDaDJ a AixN4 CPNIn, WIfMNNI AS NDNx Dx SW IUIKI EW IAv[ ADMllaw: MI[[ papRAO. AtSAO 'LIIINFAIY IKuwlar AK, CIXM iD aY011, INWIC A A wow a •sem Iu1, xY1011C•I • CLYIRN NrAta vnv, w +K L[I•:Ix a —I W. Kxcf wNxc 1 NGW Wn WIEGYI aIKK T—tll V•r l fW YYIIKKi YDIMLAxY' AW 'YMt. Kat IK raipK StYEx (1) ml'xYS SIY'i1SSY. • 1 Y1JOrOSY, A mura a mic Oc 0 XGW 011ir ESgYIr —.1,]1.•L J S,e'J>'XY. A 06l.AlIU p 1 1 [UT. A SMITwY, A ODux4 a r[(t Ip • iavl p Ix[ x1111 LW a SID l01 a Ilx S YY4 yq KSI IK LalpU4 IWNE (D CRMYS 1 S1f.3*. YA• O—CE aO J,[I.LW.ro fW. J. x,r.c,•Y. • aaux[ a YAoa rm. ro n[ AmA a aCu.IK LOxvNmr: Sale 1LL •I, a1 lal ACKS LLaa n Lfis. BASIS OF BEARINGS: BENCHMARK: arARIIGS •K REYO a CAlrplM tOK a, sure nAK aK ft MIx Noss —a s1wPE0 RS 61M; CadaNNrcl xAW. (roa a"O10»OIOLOe) ca... lorola' (E MI �. umAc rinp INFORMATION: Av.�i cl AAK. Ixnun KAWss. uKxAL vl•x 4NYwlDx. fbK 06f IW IXmri lop Irs[ nNN (D 4Yp Vlt P2ILRHD wG WPoSED euEaw AEU LOT IbhANY. PwxYG A4f.E Axu LwOSLIK AafA wNPiN\ •Y[A x(Ki[ Pw[x0 KOaaa xuKu vAwAc vxpu[P Itl1XnII1 — K4EP IDIMCKLE PAggK YKy{AA txxEt PNaWo KYLwtD. YKPAwNO IWa K—CYKD Rlanxt Y1WN1• >a loll l 510[ 4 YWIK, CWwK•Ip IK sxxrALLP ALLgWI{L NatOKi Kull vwPos[D NwdNC noaEs PxaoxD NNn+D Kt 0 GRAPHIC SC1� wY�) I -PoR Iw - IrXCIAA u alo-rw-on JYP rwr•IEsrza xaD wD wxDYxu nDrD IKL1M G 91591 cwYuan CDYWAcw - « C4r[RaAL Y-) SRCEK PI.Ax - 1[KCu• KLaK unu (Ylurm[C .KA 1) rtYEcuu IaLDK 4xRR - rMx.K K�AWwI .r: aA ❑. UYe» Ards, e.om m rt II YaRh 1,000 A. n, 0—) 121) W. n (Jl 1.) aau W. n, (lea) N— W. rl (x]ri) q SYAUS [A00 Y / IWp Y • S SRK[S . K SPKU (MOW J vw-•LC[SLN[ AM YNL . s9•Us / JJ - 1 JAAD[S c S Kii W SPAC[S / A - 1 YYC[S 1 srK[S o'•D' 9 KXSpxS I. WE— WLpx61 u axsaD al urtNM NKDYL) IL xOx-caIBIIs.1 CA0TO TO U (SVIMIIta o 10 YNYn 10 b11E0e1Y O[YI, ral W-01 (af[RIRD AWnW IP-0' I ILM m-lo-1 INDEX MAP: �.-'� O �wM � wW Sub^,, �•,.w PARCEL i r• .. �. 1«Vx[w:K SP-11! U�u'r'wo«L pmrNnm Y.0 «u«n aay-«1 •R:1]e oo' l•lel 1. e4Dla'J1'• � , µwv«�. IrrA mri.i �. -AM 00'1L:•DOM'.-JPIrJJ' ICDYWxCI,I sv-11 �� .. T, a w�--A,.:•_ti " � '• «cYxrcx . ,. � ., u.Lww•.w. vAKn I •• � •,«s �� r •;'rAecK s �'`;� :� ylwa � .-Lolw Y. I yY\ W7i . A J. X•. \ GRAPHIC SCALC I wY . Ir O R•ISAO A•iSX' •-IPM'OY SITE KEY NOTES: -- (� IwavYu xIULN4 (Yt •vu•rtcIIWAI a slxlclua Puxsl O MINVAY IxAsn IKlUSIF (Y[ «KwILCIUxu a SIM«IUWI V,MJ) rNOEENMONNI EENr O VWMhIU CaKKIt CUMtl • a111U I[' KUxI, m) ® PxaVXU vJxa)IrK COxCKII CWa Y fMILMAu le' nlCnl, nvl 59 Pxaw[0 [aKx[t[ L4ANa PWIuxO [[u[xl COxCxl1l .' w.vt4l( tlAY nIxIV wl(Cr•L NA[n COrKlai[ 50[NKx lwD C[Kxl [OxOltl[ 0 Mlaw[D 4YKR[1[ 51(gP (Y[ AMNIFCNrK ! YDK1aW vuxil ll] HwNMU wl[GLK eucx CaKKIE sIUpY IY[ AW:NIfCILWK a SIWKIUNI VWsI w ONNNO[ all NN4AU AW K[tSLxl[ W-0YK (YW[S x01 10 (Att[0 11 w Aw aKtlKx) M�WaEN rl TO U[Y AW KUS4&[ [uW MYP ICEOSS YOKS x0110 ht([0 1a. LUKnudrw }a[ MI 0u•urt cONrr,Ol lJ ID a[D aucl O vp 0 xGW-OM 19UC11 lOLO[D WYA•K M[CxAI eu0x [aa20 COx[Af1[ SUR lY( an •KNl(CiLxu A S1x4NWAL nAxsl O YRa0Y016 WxIWp C[ L—DD IL—UICL— 1 Mph Ki[ IYr 4Oltal•iii PgWw[11 0 A`AW1 wHl[w (Yf UOKa KiONI). 3--1 SIH•U CaerA, r'rrgwl TEXAS r l:l N� «,,,[• 1}-,W1G1 „,� ROADHOUSE O PN LU --Wn ASWWI -L... IYL 4011[xxW S .). 1' •SYIYLI h1WKl [aWY. Ai —1 Oaf[ COIanL W —I." UAS[ O WTEMECUTA w-w W •YNAyi n-1pWi CAUFURNIA O iwLWwlY lwPJun AAu lY[ lA,a15W4 PW1) O AYIagyY wrtY[xl PwxxK SIuO SIxYNvc SWO WINCHESTER ROAD 0 iraviu AW wxxwc YW, KLIErac vw •M/ax rYa r . AS KP/AU Y/ IWa E04 Im u AND MARGARITA ROAD S'a —u •W V•AxaL, —v --1 SIMNK ANO fEWM aR IOUE CW! `':'[♦� aJY YxaVAY KILCIABLE AAalmU RAIL ® vIIOrC,AO wf RKR U xxOn80 KKMs I. Ow.) ® V•YHYAY kw,/,—t KINNW NKI Oi NYMO[N ® w AY W I KKI. CUNIRKIN SNW WDIKL LKn1 Mi D L UWI ML. IICNI ral rulwt tJ1Ae1J0 AVO CO el r°a[a s , v SO[ La— —.. vt, W." Cawn Y — 101. aKIT ilR[ aANMYA W W YL YKLI UVI wD I—LIYK Vlw ral MM FrOxlAxl01[ Q nvANDLY NLIKIL rwt 0W*1WTl CaWLC)w SITE PLAN UDIa4 EUAKIL CIaD] 10 Kww fY uw. IWIDJLV[ ARCH To K— Sri UDIM: IKL/ $IMN ID KYAx O Uw. fox IY KY•N antAx YYr[eN PA23-0341 C3.1 DTERIORrWIRW MULE flLi xr 4IrWMUP YDYY WA[K CFWIIn' M. r 1 W Cr!�lIOC L Iiwllnu YIIwl10.1 mrwwnurMx[ rw000x 1uV.�f a�n lwo ur4uliio 1iY r 1 siieAnxwxu4lsrwnarxm oowxPrau �� PAlr r: Rnv[xtu t[MRPWDi�! YM U,lMP�I[RM�Mx O4M1,RlxIAw1, I4MRR. YropM LWD�101roMrtx iFlli CEYp�CF�RWC W0.UAYDIAWrt 4W:L lu[Y - -_— cpM[R[YI MKxiDIlrcMrbY 'IOK61Gp' WRMl SY4I fJW R[IAIiK [DAp tID Y[lAl RWf 4n4 sRul wxu4luwK v[RrK4 uAu PrAprojr yvr4Vii[ �r MxNAGIWto cIDlV nxtd WNY DM:IAIA bIlAM1' IWx41 MR lIMa110�RA pYc4N IAIIFsblLOM Arro c1YW uLInrLKlrtxr i �R[ tFDG[ 11R111 w ux4R rort wiDaw: urKILO o°Yx"ixru tLLVAroxs Aw raR cMrre x%WurxwY4rost�aw Y:RctR rolw[RYIIWRD Ynrair rornroRr REAR ELEVATION (SOUTHEAST) TEXAS ROADHOUSE I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS exm w.xml Llowl Ar1u .. N. 8.000 SF SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' c1'.D nm«,n IM, TEIAECULA, CA �^L.� I:tl01YYAM 1..173N.536 PA23-0341 u FRONT ELEVATION (NORTHWEST) REAR ELEVATION (SOUTHEAST) V-W. 6ry1 Mere A—. WiletlWN cl'. q .IM.s 6tl631 tltll.ltl 92W 1 841.1tltl.%36 TEXAS ROADHOUSE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8,D00 SF SCALE: 1/4'=V-0- TElAPA2 0341 A2. 1 r 1 r r r LEFT ELEVATION (NORTHEAST RIGHT ELEVATION (SOUTHWEST) TEXAS ROADHOUSE I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS e600 w.um�w.,e.en�.swmxoou 8A SF SCALE. 1/4"=1'-D" 'i�.�Jllih :4 31 TEMECUTA, CA iX A2.2 .17 MAIN l W 7. 1516 PAZ3-D341 L CODE ANALYSIS oxurAae lwo !rg aY CA111011YA WIIBIIC CWfl o.r. 1' attiawrNYiNrIWIIBIIgt Numsgwulu YIYYIYLOY an • uwr WYW aauY o — numssuuWauwrYucooY �reuwpowWuaWn rlllaa awr ANA MYYYYI WYL CIWIq � IMLLYi w�N urn le����r I�R FLOOR PLAN TEXAS ROADHOUSE FLOOR PLAN EXHIBIT W1"B" BBW W.Bryn A4wi Avenue. SuileBWN tl0005F -SALE 3/10 I.O. fFx.ge.IlYmu60W1 :tlIF„UTA LA A1.0 L BR.TBB.91W I gT.1q.95M .i�3i /� ' INDEX MAP: GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1 uL CruOxc 1x O[ eMt[CAIdS uo xMM[xamxs � � [6SCe[tlT1BI15 AvmmAWww w IK Gfa[CIK E / -1011a CanxKTa Yml CAI[Fui) rrATLYM uI YI( YlCwuwLS Ax0 r[f[D(a:C E CG61IS 0•CM 'A• �T. AlL c smarcxL D >W, M LDu1nx wo/a nl. a ,.� a•exs � Y�.x a TEE, � A W. a a� a D[ rA� � i3 �D ,+AxaL • UTAM CO lK NF of 9A[LCNI. T N M Rlc u0 EWC` w,LAUE Ix[ WOawicx R ql 10 a 9[LYO a K arG T L 1 CWLG[ m m )x! [MMKia xAK WL M LOW Nutt LOGIex I FE AT TTAT Fan 14 v mivan,Avw n1u mIv a' Aa11IAnrnl VA x ft E$AT .NI GGvua 1 AIDESIT [YKl rcLD ITO .1e d Iw �� Z mAOI L-ADO aFA-aru, 1 eJ1 •ma=OC aR. , K11 SC ix! rlI ATTO In a T[ tWE MITI ro l6lOU.i[ A•Qeer L•Ie1N'.yrA]T" W. 1,A VINIL •KN CDxEL[i [IIM IM VMTw)YD 511[ NMA1M[MR Slcxx a m a PMCEL) 'Ase.DO' I�JW[A' ..]D]I•)5• A GWIIUCia slru EATut OA01AxH Ire Px01[Cia Ix/al[G •wee ID OF COm[,elxal YR arnw xALiexi --� -- — > wao to wow. WCY[ , eras tares A u, TIC wTa nsw m DALLE DDACCS FLIAL n...... e A,fg; CIW LI.UI [WE "DAND tONA[ aw11L0[ 10 W IT, I OW SaI,CTRAD Artie a SIMKt I4DIG tWL M CaDEtI(D R iM [allucla AI x0 .lD1DALY GREY t01K aNCI „ �` �ami.rw.r.L. ALL ETTIM AND PIaOYO TOP a FruK CLLVANDIIS TO aSIIC SIMMES DIALL r Y W.I. x WE DADA TINT ix[ IMOICR. A y .' _ 4I1yG R ID AIATINTO USING IIIAItt WIC NOT fKD 10 KAr IETSIw MALL 10 etWx, ANC O OAxWE 10 CAPEA NN[1 A01 NAND IO Do IK DATE: RAAI SC rlrAA[D Al CD INEA M$ *L N W IO ixf (MFILIa a IXF DxwG AxD/a IND•IHR. AD jl •nw II COACTIM YNII RmR AT M TAAIAO Axl DA[K[ 10 GATT AfRWI. CpclDo CK'Al T W. , I [1,A f 11 1. Wo COItiIROF 1 1Wrc Aw/a • '/Ix• •Ar'aN.OA^)I.i. O raA I i iw.r+u. aDNED, gVA[0 YVII H wUR ID Ix[ 511[FKIIa a IN ax!• ALD/a + „.+ ` \ / Imo' I•D. "iCe r.-..I _ Mkn , J wC u. I.— IRIALL NOH--EIIIED YS wISK( a WIMICIAN.111. r,._ .^ T�,r-" -- \ a)r,r1111 a•OD• _I was r•u• 11 A CM IYat AM Axl Aa 9C111 WE — ACT EXCEED ri � r - � - - — - - _ � \ �I 1A D[ IGXAIIIbNI YOK AIM Ax, ADe ALCE55 WE xnWN %K COAYaMEO A • - � x01 ` [SDI .. ... I - _m'rICaIIC6wL SM» `• w rALW, LVIl GCG. eA EARS IS IN[ 9a AI — Wv x01 1.111...I 16 .DI I.Vew 4•AD[S SWll 9 A D Ai AAI SIOaS, OAAAK Pows Aa •KAK 1 ice @ \ y1 VAL. Aw ICC65 ASIfS Aa LwOwe ewuL .1 EIRED DR ID W YD•(w ANY j w Q � � i' ZI M xL'Je'OD• [-, a e•Ri/.vn p[ lvannw.. DAEA— WOKS 1O SE fM Isl FEET WWa w wix Axp I'Klx ` _ •� TIS /\J` 1> ILAWAN wa YR—I O—Ex v.HLc1. YAFK¢ Na ADKEx1 [bCMR RIa05FD u � .` �tl - ... \:? S1r«]f"[ aLM' SOnWAS !a IM Krim! -11 TO ME ISRDW Yxll AOT GCEID 1/� ��.'�. - Att(59Yt N011l _ `\\ x )r6N• A, a. vGlr%l a It" LDex SC LE 1 � � `� � `. •-. •_+ \ '\ zl IT, II —Ell e1dwC —L . Ww AS KC2Wtt Fa 1. wx11ERd a M Tax ` -,��-..-••�..-IfISM"! SODr Ir ` .•1?« —Olt II[ — a —L —swat a w Kta 1 mx wL � A � M1 N � x m1rAr L 1 , x. Ax0 Lall Ixcw.lAw I w,6 — -~`. Gy i` \ irJ� sss" 1 �ri� 4A-�irplex _ xEl/Jaw xrL - 1lUS ` GNAYNR: SL'ALE S.SLJ BASIS OF BEARINGS: a wws ARE EASED a raW ia[ , SIAIC PUx CWrOxAIM WDe, [Potn x rTIN [ i' ]l IW L4a rlrDYro' BENCHMARK: '1 1 ,;— - `��� GRADING LENGEND: ww 7wlx xwss xwAr, su1Ax0 'vts use: ruv.lex: ID)D.ir IWw ml 1 ' PR laEwl.ia• IDmle i ID)GDrcID awls m WIa GGIw Eumlxw i )a ( ' LtDe•; i----naovxO ICAxa-vDa WIo[TE em r wnW w mWI. Iw.7 FLOOD NOTE: —A,, c L-11. w JOIC Y Awl WI lWT[0 ADNx T. ROW 11/.xt VG IT.. x.lax Wxlaw uR IF m D" Ex[wLxLY wV WfL(NI K[utt WfOwO. CaWMf oA1x] wAla1 apy» ]DL 00 c ,.E- DATE I sleroan W W talwr a, m------ TIE S A a rsr,E eDw wwr ROADHOUSE s mWWVa.mClax SQ AAW[CIWa RA.6 ' ..i EOW W lle.axa Or0lx0 na IYW .ui. m[eFW®n _W.ua swL lInA1G¢ IEF 1 »JD' '•' iii'....vt I' 4W05! C IWa[aGRR a GaIK rA.n c K Woes n 'D ILWx uLW1a S KCLssxu wwn A➢G L ,Ic rw,x rAAa j • f wKn G6TK DwM mACKm a A 1 ILM GA � � �� 1I • aP a SIA.cxwE rWL( Ia a rrx o cue I�rIDmK GEWTnI wa AT I— EADEE AI -A. a —1 CJ MAI m L� A xr A L L GRAPHIC SCALE r 1 Ex reel > 7-77-71 -- .6F wL TEXAS ROADHOUSE TEMECULA CAUFOR[IA SNO WINCRESTER ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD GONGEPTDAL GRADING PLAN wumxA. C4.0 PA23-034.1 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: I xxmlw xoxx x rccalDra ua x1 xrotlwF ImExr, cn`wlic a`v0f1xL xoel°w"ai nE asses Rxxns .ro cWwIIxN RL rw. rIN ,w FVSPC'UTrniF 1a1�—^,WM.11EYD1`•d,NEw,�4ExxME wonnw .ro ruwE«Nu a J tw a tra cei•ra a to w•n M D/[P4L scaE a Rw n a unur[aw.11[n-r tN0oo1s0 TO War K2mR1 1PCx1 —1 M rww[ aT_ TOO. to x!wDxR nM xow n rccaxD,NCE Ile coxslxletxw maneuts .wD a Lxw[ r. IxE sum a �AD I 1xF Plxxc .vw CDxlPalce's txnon[s Wmw Iw caps a 1vE PxLWCI ow au s:lw r% PnxuE LDatxc sxxE _ ys Io LLoun .uuawwuu man tNts xl unsl ! -Don1 Pe) wuxs Parox ' ' to COT rrn' aNDlnlox /EVCAvergx, Zw.LL a ,NC MTroxLDim a ` IN COINKTO 10 nlanlE g41wC Ula CT xxxR CaxLCI x Ix[ [Llwii0t4D' Dom! [Ixi6.5 U l0, ,Wd[ IUM [rn lanlW. .w/d _ r Pwl a Hutto ID aae uwles u sxWx W Iw vRnv uo/d rocvxo _ � e : s� .�, ,. ...,,.. Z drvaT N4NaD M M [xLxCd !d aSrll DCx[ xJv w OMP ZnE lfx,uPCS. ^ t w u 41P4. TlxwlwRS rrU xbC[l1AnDU5 I xT xDlx wxwD u0 ,BDh CxaM n ^ " - n .._`\/ " Ixi rP[ wMl M Uw5 a PDPx ilxi wry nalR[ x[vJv4 TO M MTO . NC xrPD.'TO Mx x0..1 rx[ rol wwd a [aDgrt,d 4 ! MSIroTO 1. rd ru wrdN .wo/d P[Plxanw a sled nrxb u ro .➢aroxr _ _co- _ .. i con to M e oww.erd SWI worn ,v[ w1. C IMm S PxlOx TITear[x[NC _ •, — .D'+• AYN� e.} Nn sn[ D[I+Dulwl a•tPnlab D —IX �OT—TaxxFVIW Nw xyw.•w a a "'rees�•mxYs°"M ys. _ -� '�`� ," ,. '�:� :, [M xIC u d CS wNw IK ggPDYO xrCld wi rlSD % • I R.O.I, i - cowrcl unW orxYw rol Inns nao-als IsoD-ess-Jau d I • Iti „ W ,Dr•ELS I E(uZxYaUw[V.[[Du) ID CD IE —WCIUx OF M [xblx4 > CpDVK,d r EVCw.ei['wD nav N !RD rLL Gblux; walr —.—. TrZES. •_^ "'� j'De' �1S — _ �� RQ\ •`,� roxadxs IEwlala PwPIbrD F-IS a cdwnal PxxR TO coxnwx Ac NN• i , _ IxttxcwwlD wxstxuctw coxaxctd stvxJ xom rn awP un [wxtw dCAs��-_ -1- — — I-- — a rxr aawPx,Icps d caxlxa ur.�n Io PxaatWa xnx w4lxunox —� AFEDoI- �--[ _ - • - at 'u . e wrwnce swrL canexa4Lt L abt•c ndr sstEvs M;1➢RE'� J +nr � JrDD. :• COMP aea,lola AS NFaZTwY ID PIIRfRI Sll d aMla xCCulxxnlax � - _ i W \ � �•lCoer\ x Pxaos0 cD•uErt dwxx to M enxlx,uas ««cPn[ calMs raw Cuixolns wr a PFnucro io r, artDUL cad eucx 1\\ � = �� '°'I' . N wxfx CaCMi[ d PrHNEw L: 11 �A,_—.. . o ~. � / it •NS J C C to, " — � N �•� [v4TMC ImD ` A r I /�1VV /•///LJ I PDJPosEo i e uwlwc wlcx TEXAS 6 ROADHOUSE f� Sa .xaM[CIwUt RIxrS J ' IDII wRnxD ldlPAn E w scars � 'NJJ GRAPHIC SCALE Ices mr I UliliJYiMIBiYiYi%i\ p �o �1. ' • `441xC r41Ex UTILITY KEY NOTES: I�IwPnDYD wwu IRc awxlwxl rannbx ha) w Lara x•ILr ® I•xaysEo r. In rlw sunla INnx, nEm • wLn ID w Rr• al rJlalwc ww lDrLn. rRn eD., owl xd wuL ruEx wun/ ® vxaPasEo rR[ x.ceun Q PxlwoxD a•. DaLUJ aund caa (+aL/ rolwL nx EuaL wtx ualn) O e's DIP CIAZs L aC Pwi[Cwrl w[v YquC[ Lx[ O "—D xarroxo a:twwsllc x+ra xxwa w� ro w xult or LJa1Rl. ur Un0.ln) � • [WB nd Iwttt, van Bw WICt Pw LD[i •Lt[v Q PggOYD D', a,CnC wra xe,[R t..T/Iwwa PEP LDC¢ Rw[x w0.1r1) 0 PDDx•Dwtax enna Pwttxwx wwtt (w..t rota. wx 0 PADroJ[D )'v MF x Cdxx DWnK ••,d LK PxowsLo r• rarwl.R xxlEx xxwn ur ro a wn ar twlwD INw umiam) 1°" • aRe nce Ivrtt. wan eDx, wat na Loco .•ra O PPgPiD 11 xP 1. at[P Kra Ivxxl/roxm rG LauL rlw O rani a.Dlttx wLilrl,� —La w[nna DMtt [wut/ ,nrew xx O � ���i� x CaP(9 IxR4.lgx q.Rx ui Yf atl.•ip qub ©S Ratu4 ulFx L•L/ nrunar ,D w PwR[RD Q PParosEo I4 1. Of -1.c R«Ixc La OPPOPoS[D xcawn [«Cl.. a[. T« RECwxx FURS rce xedowr IL[Cw4.l -1. wDD -01 m x4uUG CDIIxP1 nrP xH 0—, R0 TIZ[ TO M —0 ua ,61ano P [nnxctL O Mdlxxcld NDI'OT[D - I'IIIE CdINKId T, ptRC Lxxn Mesa w.x... PDL-, fall Pa[ fxlW[ w0 CCwCCi IONM SDWIr 10 LIL La11K n rce xxExstt cuuvn xuoax Laxwe oxaxxn ro m xL scan IESrI wD Ixunrnxc Ivx Id xdE .rDxW11d Q nmlw Rccrxc txs/ YxIx:,WE ro w Pwacrco PvagscD NURgK test Iwlawld LwL CDdWwlt MVIr. re•J NSIR°iax wan[wws Mx iIFPIG( rJxwRrt Y[ •xCaRCCeN rro [If[1Nax N/M TO raxiQW xCdWiW +wD RlN2) ©i nmlw c¢ sexla Les/=1xW1W[ to a wmFcno T—D DV•[ ry Ur/ SIPILIIM ©, RaDw rttx DPa L,[/ sT•lnw[ TO BE wu,«YD ® Pwvo [D e' sawn xnx Lxb 0 c PPaxbEo xnx u.Nd1 tSOC Px-0 J.WD I/l Gx1AY rIENUI'IW I4J 1xax1TED 'rxP1Nn Y.vRxC xuxgt who PPa D naa Dbxl LN[ — — — — PxaS,ln Ixx xT r«E wDrRl mLrs,c xud mibrxwFx — INN — Ixxt laaxfa xrxttL — R[C,PC � Zrrnxr CIaxDDI R[PxWF W. dE Wlmw — C — wxxuxalax — ss — swlwr xwx Ixu — slrra — Yaa dr1 Lw rr r..ln.., ... wu sxx,mDx [a..u• uw,�l s+. rm xw wµcLre�xy: TEXAS r ROADHOUSE TEMEcuu CAUFORNIA :WO MWCNESTER ROAD MO MAX CARITA ROAD #. r UTILM PLAN Ax••! •Tarr_ _ C6w0 Ud. John We np hVill Ceamth,, E—o' , IF-N,W K,p—a'Shl—lp'l Ug— pp Spartan Jumper Sh V Sceptre R,d Z I., T,—J,pa—P—1 um U11,01fieVOW, Pla-t GIO—C-Ell NOW- j NORTH CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WOOD ARCHITECTURE TEXAS ROADHOUSE - C'L'P-1 TEMECULA, CA ` MM,A {, 1 .1II v TEXAS '•;% ROAOHOU Scale: 1 inch= 30 Ft. LIGHTING PARAMETERS: _alculatlon Summary .abel Units Avg Max Min Av Mln Max Min Grid Z PtSpcLr PtSpcTb :ntrancc Fc 6.40 7.0 58 1.10 1.21 _ 0 5 5 BARKING Fc 3.54 8.R 1.0 3.54 8.80 0 30 10 RENDER VIEWS: Design Notes: Reflectance: Walls -0.5 Target Requirements_ PARKING AREA : 1FC MIN or better - Achieved ENTRANCE : 2FC MIN or better - Achieved General Notes - The preparer of this study does not assume responsibility for the suitability of this design In accordance with ILSNA rcc.m prior to placing Jn order, it is the customer's responsibility to carefully review and approve this study. please note that this analysis is based on a mathematical model and its accuracy is constrained by the limitations of the third -party software and the ILS standards employed. While the digital CAD data may appear to be precise, it is important to recognize that this apparent accuracy is a result of the techniques used to generate it and should not be interpr, ted as real -world accuracy. Numerous factors will affect the actual performance of lighting in the constructed space. These factors include the accuracy of the original source files provided by the manufacturer (.ies files), variations in Input voltage and ballast performance, the actual finishing values within the constructed environment, manufacturing discrepancies in both the light source Ilampl and the I —mire, the final placement of the luminaires, the presence of obstructions, and the quality of installation. Furthermore, n is essential to acknowledge that lield measurements themselves are susceptible to errors stemming from selected measurement methods or technology, as well as the expertise and capabilities of the measuring party, While the creator of this lighting study strives for accuracy, they cannot be held accountable for any errors that may occur. The renpient of this lighting study acknowledges and accepts that the likelihood of scaling errors increases in absence of a DWG file or other properly dimensioned drawing provided to the designer. Given that reflective values have a significant impact on light levels, it is imperative for the end -user of this document to verily and confirm these values before accepting the results nt any photometric report. ..M.; � A MH-. 25 oq% MH: is MWN VH; 25 C, A C MH: 25 TEXAS ROADHOUS Entr; m 8 - ---------- UH: C PC 'MH:25 K49: ZSI It Scale: 1 inch= 16 Ft. Aj Gl ao 0) E 0 0 cc 4A m x o'— By a( Olte:1013JI024 C . MH: 25 _ . 9 Scale: 1 inch= 16 Ft. of 0 �-. `swreeTFx, 1�11, . � ®® M■ � � 11 �. �f�reLTry .. > . ,/A aA I A.0 'r o I FIGURE ttPE 'OWB-V' - TYPICAL 71 30W WALL WASHER F75 only SOW WALL WASHER �� —_— - o I _ FIGURE TYPE 'OWB _ FIXTURE 9 TYPICAL OUTDOOR BRACKET FOR TYPE "F9" FIXTURE i = LED GOOSENECK MJYP1805 (ES716) 5 YEAR WARRANTY ey F17 LED GOOSENECK ABOVE FRONT ENTRANCE RVLT SKU# MJYP1806 LED 2700k BULB:10PU02E26LED27 5 YEAR WARRANTY TEXAS ROADHOUSE I SPECIFICATIONS 16WW Aryn Wwr Ar Suile8M B.000 SF SCALE NiS Cl,.111 w 6W21 TEMECULA.CA eP(•'� 92001A47 M.M6 v v BIKE RACK DETAIL SECTION AT SCREEN WALL 7 FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) 8600 W. Bryn M— Avenue. Suite BOON ANa CNcno, Ilk- 60631 847.788,9200 1 847.788 9536 4 3 EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ALLURA LAP SIDING, RUSTIC CEDAR 8.25" FIBER CEMENT (7" EXPOSURE) COLOR: SUMMER WHEAT SIDING ALLURA VERTIAL PANEL, RUSTIC 8" OC GROOVE, COLOR: SUMMER WHEAT TRIM, METAL PAINT #1: 2 FLASHING & GUTTERS SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, GREEN PAINT #2: 3 DOWNSPOUTS & SPLIT -FACE CMU TO MATCH BRICK VENEER DOWNSPOUTS @ PAINT #2.1 "SMOKEY 4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, #6117 TOPAZ' CEDAR POSTS FINISH COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT COLOR METAL DOORS & 5 FRAMES, DUMPSTER PAINT #3: GATES, BOLLARDS & SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, GLOSS BLACK METAL RAILS. COMMERCIAL BRICK CORPORATION 6 BRICK VENEER "HOMESTEAD" PROVIA: DRY STACK "OTTAWA" THIN STONE VENEER (OVER 4" OR 8" CMU) 7 STONE VENEER 3819 OLD WHEELING RD. ZANESVILLE, OH 43701 740-450-4236 8 METAL ROOF METAL SALES 5V-CRIMP, GALVALUME �-8 6 //-3 RIGHT ELEVATION (EAST) TEXAS ROADHOUSE MATERIAL BOARD TEMECULA,CA PMB1.0 A23-0341 WZ UU24 Citv of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • Fax (951 ) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessinlzkasrclkrec. com February 28, 2025 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA23-0341, a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooperkTemeculaCA. og_v . Sincerely, Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: Not Available Project Title: Texas Roadhouse (PA23-0341) Project Location: APN: 910-420-029 Project Description: Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Interim Community Development Director for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on February 27, 2025 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the EIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the EIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the EIR. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report and Addendum that were prepared for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: GreenbergFarrow Project Title: Texas Roadhouse (PA23-0341) Location: APN: 910-420-029 Project Description: Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): The Project consists of a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant 2. On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved on January 28, 2003 by the adoption of No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-XX. An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on September 26, 2006. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Temecula Regional Center EIR and Addendum. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and Addendum; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Matt Peters Date Interim Director of Community Development CASE NO: PROPOSAL: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to consider the matter described below: PA23-0341 APPLICANT: Texas Roadhouse A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) and Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Sections exist. The Director of Community Development will consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: February 27, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 1:30 PM ego g\NGRD Project D O 0 200 400 Feet H i l l The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Director of Community Development Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to the Director regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Director of Community Development shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Director of Community Development shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.